alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1850

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and

Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century

and to make technical corrections to the law governing

the Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1850 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Housing Com3 mission Extension Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SENIORS HOUSING AND HEALTH FA5 CILITY NEEDS COMMISSION AND TECHNICAL

6 CORRECTIONS.

7 Section 525 of the Departments of Veterans Affairs

8 and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent

9 Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 (42 U.S.C. 12701

10 note) is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘reimburs12 able’’ and inserting ‘‘non-reimbursable’’;

13 (2) in the first sentence of subsection (f)—

14 (A) by striking ‘‘Banking and’’; and

15 (B) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2001’’ and

16 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2002’’; and

17 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘June 30,

18 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2003’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-384-JD

B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.

O R D E R

This case was filed at the same time and by the same

plaintiff as the following cases: Bogdanov v. Concentra

Integrated Services, Inc., 06-cv-382-JD; Bogdanov v. Nsight

Technologies, LLC, 06-cv-383-SM; Bogdanov v. Physicians Specialty

Hospital of ElPaso East, L.P., 06-cv-385-PB; and Bogdanov v.

Christus Health Corporation, 06-cv-386-SM. Motions to withdraw

the reference from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the

District of New Hampshire, along with the bankruptcy court’s

report and recommendation on each motion, are pending in all five

cases. The motions to withdraw the reference raise the same

legal principles and share similar factual bases. 

As such, with respect to the motions to withdraw the

reference from the bankruptcy court, these may be related cases

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Local Rule 42.1. 

Unless the parties or counsel advise the court otherwise, these

cases will be consolidated solely for the purpose of addressing

Case 1:06-cv-00385-PB Document 3 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

the motions to withdraw the reference. Any objection or other

response to the order of consolidation shall be filed on or

before November 6, 2006.

In addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(2) the parties

each shall file a notice as to whether each consents to referral

of the adversary proceedings to the bankruptcy court, if the

motions for withdrawal of the reference were denied, “to hear and

determine and to enter appropriate orders and judgments, subject

to review under section 158.” Consents or notice that a party

does not consent to referral under § 157(c)(2) shall be filed on

or before November 6, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

October 24, 2006

cc: Geraldine L. Karonis, Esquire

B&H Foto & Elecctronics Corp.

Olga L. Bogdanov, pro se

US Bankruptcy Court-NH, Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00385-PB Document 3 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-227-01-SM

Marcos Nieves

O R D E R

Defendant Nieves’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 8). Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2007 trial

period. Defendant Nieves shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

March 8, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: April 16, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: May 1, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00227-SM Document 9 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 28, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Jennifer Cole Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00227-SM Document 9 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 194 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 194

To require States that receive funds under the Elementary and Secondary 
  Education Act of 1965 to enact a law that requires the expulsion of 
           students who are convicted of a crime of violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require States that receive funds under the Elementary and Secondary 
  Education Act of 1965 to enact a law that requires the expulsion of 
           students who are convicted of a crime of violence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPULSION FOR STUDENT CONVICTED OF VIOLENT CRIME.

    (a) In General.--A State shall not be eligible to receive Federal 
funds under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 unless 
such State has in effect a law which, on the first day of each fiscal 
year succeeding the fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2001, 
requires a local educational agency to expel from school for a period 
of not less than 1 month a student who is convicted of a crime of 
violence.
    (b) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
prevent a State from allowing a local educational agency that has 
expelled a student from such a student's regular school setting from 
providing educational services to such student in an alternative 
setting.
    (c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
            (1) the term ``local educational agency'' has the same 
        meaning given such term in section 14101 of the Elementary and 
        Secondary Education Act of 1965; and
            (2) the term ``crime of violence'' has the same meaning 
        given such term in section 16 of title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel J. Rynne

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00283-JL

New Hampshire State

Prison, Warden, et al.

 O R D E R

At yesterday’s telephone conference, the petitioner's

counsel informed the court that the petitioner will proceed on

each of the issues (numbered 1-4) identified in Judge Muirhead's

October 21, 2008 order, that he will file a memorandum in

response to the Warden's motion for summary judgment, and that he

is aware of his obligations under Rule 11. The petitioner's

brief is due on or before June 28, 2010.

The court requests that petitioner's counsel pay particular

attention to the Warden's procedural default arguments as to

claims 1 and 3. While the court has not prejudged the issue,

those procedural default arguments appear to be colorable. 

Case 1:08-cv-00283-JL Document 30 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: May 28, 2010 

cc: Erland C.L. McLetchie, Esq.

Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00283-JL Document 30 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2019 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2019-1, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on January 23, 2019 and ending onFebruary 28, 2019and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 23rd day of May, 2019 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1921

To eliminate the requirement for students to register with the selective service

system in order to receive Federal student financial assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 21, 2001

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Ms. LEE, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. SANDERS, and Ms.

MCKINNEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To eliminate the requirement for students to register with

the selective service system in order to receive Federal

student financial assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Financial Aid

5 Regulatory Relief Act’’

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT.

7 Subsection (f) of section 12 of the Military Selective

8 Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 462(f)) is repealed.
2

•HR 1921 IH

1 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

2 Subsection (n) of section 484 of the Higher Edu3 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(n)) is repealed.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-229-01-SM

Tony Rosas

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 10) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than April 1, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: April 24, 2008 at 4:30 PM

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 12 Filed 03/28/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: May 6, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 28, 2008 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Michael Zaino, Esq.

 Jessica Brown, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 12 Filed 03/28/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan B. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Alan B. LevinAlan B. LevinChief Financial OfficerMay 16, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Rojas, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 831]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Benitez, J.), rendered September 9, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict rejecting defendant’s agency defense was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant did not act solely to accommodate the buyer *(see People v Roche,*45 NY2d 78, 85 [1978], *cert denied*439 US 958 [1978]; *People v Lam Lek Chong,*45 NY2d 64, 74-75 [1978], *cert denied*439 US 935 [1978]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

*326Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Lauren S., Appellant, v Ira S., Respondent.

[811 NYS2d 1]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2003, which upheld the dismissal of the petition and directed that any disputes between the parties must be brought to arbitration, and order (same court and Judge), entered on or about November 8, 2004, which upheld the dismissal of both parties’ petitions and directed them to arbitrate all disputes regarding support, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The parties’ separation agreement contains a broad arbitra*527tion provision covering “any claims or disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or any breach thereof.” This provision is not vitiated by the standard form language contained in the judgment of divorce, that “the Court retains jurisdiction of the matter concurrently with the Family Court for the purpose of specifically enforcing such of the provisions of that Separation Agreement as are capable of specific enforcement, to the extent permitted by law, and of making such further judgment with respect to maintenance, support, custody or visitation as it finds appropriate.” The Family Court therefore properly directed the parties to arbitrate their disputes. We reject petitioner’s suggestion that arbitration was waived. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of BPZEnergy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Randall D. Keys, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/ Randall D. Keys*   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Randall D. Keys         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| January 17, 2006   |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>