alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCPR-22-0000720 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
IN RE MONICA TERESA LEHUA MORRIS, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the practice law in the State of Hawai # i , filed by attorney Monica Teresa Lehua Morris, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i(RSCH), but to retain the paper license as a memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule 1.10(b), and the affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude that Petitioner Morris has fully complied with the requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is granted. Petitioner Morris may retain the paper license as a
memento. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g). Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-22-0000720 22-DEC-2022 09:50 AM Dkt. 6 OGPIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Morris, attorney number 4935, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai # i, effective with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 22, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of The Dress Barn, Inc. (“the Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 25, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Armand Correia,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 The
foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended
to be used for any other purpose.
 
  /s/ Armand Correia
 Armand
Correia
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 September
21, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Eduardo K . Fernandez-Avalos

Criminal No . 07-cr-252-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

40) filed by defendant is granted . Trial as to co-defendant Maria

C . Rosario is also continued .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : July 24, 200 8

cc : Martin Leppo, Esq .

Paul Twomey, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Steven Gordon, Esq .

William Christie, Esq .

Mark Irish, Esq .

Case 1:07-cr-00252-JD Document 41 Filed 07/24/08 Page 1 of 1
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1870

AN ACT

To provide for the sale of certain real property

within the Newlands Project in Nevada, to thecity of Fallon, Nevada.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1870

AN ACT

To provide for the sale of certain real property within the

Newlands Project in Nevada, to the city of Fallon, Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1870 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

3 Loading Facility Transfer Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF FALLON, NEVADA.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (b)

7 and (c), the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to

8 the city of Fallon, Nevada, all right, title, and inter9 est of the United States in and to approximately 6.3

10 acres of real property in the Newlands Reclamation

11 Project, Nevada, generally known as ‘‘380 North

12 Taylor Street, Fallon, Nevada’’, and identified for

13 disposition on the map entitled ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

14 Loading Facility’’.

15 (2) MAP.—The map referred to in paragraph

16 (1) shall be on file and available for public inspec17 tion in—

18 (A) the offices of the Commissioner of the

19 Bureau of Reclamation; and

20 (B) the offices of the Area Manager of the

21 Bureau of Reclamation, Carson City, Nevada.

22 (b) CONSIDERATION.—

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall require

24 that, as consideration for the conveyance under sub25 section (a), the city of Fallon, Nevada, shall pay to
3

•HR 1870 EH

1 the United States an amount equal to the fair mar2 ket value of the real property, as determined—

3 (A) by an appraisal of the real property,

4 conducted not later than 60 days after the date

5 of enactment of this Act by an independent ap6 praiser approved by the Commissioner of Rec7 lamation and paid for by the city of Fallon, Ne8 vada; and

9 (B) without taking into consideration the

10 value of any structures or improvements on the

11 property.

12 (2) CREDIT OF PROCEEDS.—The amount paid

13 to the United States under paragraph (1) shall be

14 credited, in accordance with section 204(c) of the

15 Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of

16 1949 (40 U.S.C. 485(c)), to the appropriate fund in

17 the Treasury relating to the Newlands Reclamation

18 Project, Nevada.

19 (c) LIABILITY.—The conveyance under subsection (a)

20 shall not occur until such data as the Commissioner of

21 Reclamation certifies that all liability issues relating to the
4

•HR 1870 EH

1 property (including issues of environmental liability) have

2 been resolved.

Passed the House of Representatives March 6,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### J. S. NOLEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUCCESSION OF L. M. DAVIDSON, C. O. Davidson, Administrator, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 5935.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 28, 1939.

Goff & Goff, of Arcadia, for appellant.

Meadors & Gensler, of Homer, for ap-pellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in this court, 190 So. 826, this day decided, the order of executory process issued herein is approved and affirmed. Appellant shall pay the costs of this appeal.
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1992...... 2.69 .35 .25 1.67 .18 .24 1.67 .54 .37 .11 1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2000: Q4... 1.59 .14 .19 .96 .11 .19 .90 .35 .26 .08 2001: Q1... 1.63 .12 .17 .97 .14 .23 .84 .37 .30 .11  Q2... 2.16 .13 .19 1.34 .16 .34 1.23 .49 .32 .12  Q3... 1.66 .09 .13 1.09 .12 .23 1.00 .36 .23 .08  Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2004   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2005   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2006   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | .     |
| 2007   | 0  | 0  | .  | .  | .     |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1278 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H.R. 1278

To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue 
Northwest in the District of Columbia as the ``Frank F. Church Federal 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2001

 Ms. McKinney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue 
Northwest in the District of Columbia as the ``Frank F. Church Federal 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest 
in the District of Columbia, commonly known as the J. Edgar Hoover 
Federal Building, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank F. 
Church Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank F. Church 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
II

Calendar No. 427

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1866

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JUNE 20, 2002

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis

for granting requests for reexamination of patents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1866 RS

1 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW QUES2 TION OF PATENTABILITY IN REEXAMINATION

3 PROCEEDINGS.

4 Sections 303(a) and 312(a) of title 35, United States

5 Code, are each amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: ‘‘The existence of a substantial new question of

7 patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent

8 or printed publication was previously cited by or to the

9 Office or considered by the Office.’’.

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

12 respect to any determination of the Director of the United

13 States Patent and Trademark Office that is made under

14 section 303(a) or 312(a) of title 35, United States Code,

15 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 5,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 427

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1866

AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify

the basis for granting requests for reexaminationof patents.

JUNE 20, 2002

Reported without amendment
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2013


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 20, 2013
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of OneSpaWorld Holdings Limitedcertifies that (1) this Annual Report of OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
/s/ Stephen B. LazarusStephen B. LazarusChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2019 
**
Exhibit 99.2



   Written Statement of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Avenue Entertainment Group
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




                                                   Sheri Halfon

August 15, 2002
Opinion issued January 9, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 2 3 - 007 62 - CV

——————————— JESSICA LYNN PARSONS , Appellant

V. SHANE WILSON , Appell e e On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2021 - 01949
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Jessica Lynn Parsons , filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s August 23 , 202 3 “Order Dismissing [ A ppellant’s] Motions for Enforcement of Agreed Final Decree of Divorce
. ” Appellant ha s neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1;2

see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § § 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b) , 51.941(a) ; Order , Fees Charged in the Supreme Court , in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals , and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- D istrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015)
. On November 9, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if app ellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by December 11, 2023. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), (c) . Appellant did not adequately respond. Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3( b), (c), 43.2(f)
. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris
.
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1995...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003...... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005...... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

1999: Q2... 1.3 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .5 2.2 .8 1.4 .4 1.0

 Q4... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000: Q1... 1.3 .6 .6 .2 .5 3.0 1.5 1.5 .4 1.1

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.2 .9 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 1.9 .7 1.2 .2 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001: Q1... 1.7 1.0 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.2 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q2... 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .4 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Q3... 1.2 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004: Q1... 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5 3.0 1.3 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .7 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.3 1.2 1.1 .3 .9

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .3 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 1.1 .8 .2 .5

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .2 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q3... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .5

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Controller of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from March 13, 2019 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2019 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through November 3, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 13, 2019 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2019 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 
| Date: January 10,   2020 | * * | Deere Credit   Services, Inc.     |
|-------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |     |                                   |
| * *                      | * * | * *                               |
|                          | By:      | */s/   Steven N. Owenson*              |
|                          |     | Steven N. Owenson                      |
|                          |     | Senior Vice President   and Controller |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1078

___________________________

Brian J. Dorsey

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

David Vandergriff

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: June 30, 2023

Filed: July 6, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri prisoner Brian Dorsey, who has been sentenced to death for two

murders, appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his motion to order the Missouri

1The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
Department of Corrections to transfer him to a facility for magnetic resonance

imaging, which he sought in support of state clemency proceedings.

With respect to Dorsey’s reliance on 18 U.S.C. § 3599, this court has already

determined that “[s]ection 3599’s authorization for funding neither confers nor

implies an additional grant of jurisdiction to order state officials to act to facilitate an

inmate’s clemency application,” Tisius v. Vandergriff, 55 F.4th 1153, 1155 (8th Cir.

2022), cert. denied, No. 22-7398, 2023 WL 3804604 (U.S. June 5, 2023), and this

panel is bound by that decision, see Mays v. Bd. of Educ. of Hamburg Sch. Dist., 834

F.3d 910, 918 n.4 (8th Cir. 2016). As to Dorsey’s reliance on the All Writs Act, 28

U.S.C. § 1651, that statute does not provide the district court the authority to grant

the relief requested.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-