alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Q1 2004 Exhibit 10.4





                                           Exhibit 10.4


                                                               **Confidential Treatment Requested




E-LOAN/zipRealty

                  Amendment Four to Marketing, Promotion, Distribution,

                  And Related Services Agreement



This Amendment Four ("Amendment") to the Marketing,
Promotion, Distribution, And Related Services Agreement dated April 15, 2002
(the "Agreement"), by and between E-LOAN, Inc. and zipRealty, Inc., amends,
modifies and supplements the Agreement as set forth below. All terms of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless expressly amended,
modified or supplemented herein.



	Term. The Term of the Agreement shall be extended beyond March 31,
2004, for an additional period from April 1, 2004 until September 30, 2004 (the
"Extension Period").

	Compensation. During the Extension Period, E-LOAN shall pay to
zipRealty the following compensation:

	
Month
	
Amount

	
April 2004
	
[**]

	
May 2004
	
[**]

	
June 2004
	
[**]

	
July 2004
	
[**]

	
August 2004
	
[**]

	
Septebmer 2004
	
[**]

	
Total
	
[**]






	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one
or more counterparts, including facsimiles, each of which will be deemed to be a
duplicate original, but all of which, taken together, will be deemed to
constitute a single instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and
dated below.


	
E- LOAN, INC.
	
zipRealty, Inc.

	
By:
	
/s/ Pete Bonnikson
	 	
By:
	
/s/ Gary M. Beasley

	
Name: 
	
Pete Bonnikson
	 	
Name:
	
Gary M. Beasley

	
Title:
	
S.V.P.
	 	
Title:
	
EVP & CFO

	
Date: 
	
__3/29/04_____________
	 	
Date: 
	
__3/29/04____________






E-LOAN - zipRealty

   Amendment Four to Marketing, Promotion, Distribution, and Related Services Agreement



                                                               **Confidential Treatment Requested
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1802 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1802

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the depreciation 
           of property used in the generation of electricity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2001

Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. English) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the depreciation 
           of property used in the generation of electricity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY USED IN THE GENERATION OF 
              ELECTRICITY.

    (a) Depreciation of Property Used in the Generation of 
Electricity.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraph (C) of section 168(e)(3) of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 7-year property) 
        is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (i), by 
        redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii), and by inserting 
        after clause (i) the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) any property used in the generation 
                        of electricity, and''.
            (2) 10-year class life.--The table contained in section 
        168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by inserting below the 
        item relating to subparagraph (C)(i) the following new item:

                ``(C)(ii)......................................   10''.
    (b) Definition of Property Used in the Generation of Electricity.--
Subsection (i) of section 168 of such Code is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(15) Property used in the generation of electricity.--The 
        term `property used in the generation of electricity' means 
        property used in nuclear power production of electricity for 
        sale, property used in hydraulic power production of 
        electricity for sale, property used in steam power production 
        of electricity for sale, and property used in combustion 
        turbine production of electricity for sale. Such term shall not 
        include any property which, without regard to this paragraph, 
        has a class life of less than 10 years.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN CERTIFICATION of

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of EFJ, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ Jana Ahlfinger BellJana Ahlfinger BellChief Financial Officer


May 1, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PROMISSORY NOTE



$23,000.00                                                        April 27, 2004



     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Trinity Partners Acquisition Company Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby promises to pay to the order of Lawrence
Burstein (the "Holder") the principal sum of Twenty Three Thousand ($23,000.00)
dollars upon the earlier of (i) April 26, 2005 or (ii) the consummation of the
Company's initial public offering of its equity securities. This Note shall not
bear interest on the principal sum thereof.

     The principal of this note shall be paid at 245 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600,
New York, New York 10016, or at such other place (including the office of any
commercial bank) within or without the State of New York as may hereafter be
designated by written notice given by the Holder of this Note to the Company.

     The Company hereby waives presentment, demand for payment, notice of
dishonor, notice of protest, and all other notices and demands in connection
with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default, endorsement or guarantee of
this note.

                                                   TRINITY PARTNERS ACQUISITION
                                                           COMPANY INC.



                                                   By: /s/ James Scibelli
                                                       -------------------------
                                                        Name: James Scibelli
                                                        Title: Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Docket No. AB-355 (Sub-No. 38X)]


Springfield Terminal Railway Company--Discontinuance of Service 
Exemption--Cumberland and Oxford Counties, ME

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board, on its own motion, is 
exempting a discontinuance from the prior approval requirements of 49 
U.S.C. 10903 for Springfield Terminal Railway Company to discontinue 
its operations over an approximately 43.81-mile rail line extending 
from milepost 7.3 to milepost 51.11 in Cumberland and Oxford Counties, 
ME. This exemption is subject to employee protective conditions.

DATES: The exemption is effective retroactively as of December 17, 
1994.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Docket No. AB-355 (Sub-No. 38X), must be filed with the Surface 
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In 
addition, one copy of all pleadings must be served on petitioner's 
representative: Robert B. Culliford, Pan Am Railways, Inc., Pease 
International Airport, Portsmouth, NH 03801.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 245-0395. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web 
site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: September 16, 2008.

    By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Buttrey.
Anne K. Quinlan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22222 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Case 1:08-cv-00428-PB Document 1-10 Filed 10/20/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection  with the Annual Report of SPO Medical Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Braunold, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Dated: June 21, 2005                   By: /s/ Michael Braunold
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael Braunold
                                           Chief Executive Officer (and
                                           Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-239-PB

Janet Smith

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for July 8, 2008, citing the need for additional

time to allow defendant to undergo a psychiatric evaluation prior

to trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 8, 2008 to September 3, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00239-PB Document 20 Filed 06/11/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 23, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

August 26, 2008 at 3:45 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 11, 2008

cc: Michael Iacopino, Esq.

Helen Fitzbiggon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00239-PB Document 20 Filed 06/11/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James McGinn

v. Civil No. 07-cv-88-SM

New Hampshire State Prison, Interim Warden

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith disapprove the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Arenas dated August 9, 2007. Accepting

counsel's representations, it would appear that the petition was not untimely filed. 

SO ORDERED.

August 21, 2007 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Michael Sheehan, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00088-JL Document 8 Filed 08/21/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,561
<INVENTORY>                                     82,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               288,880
<PP&E>                                         229,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                 150,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,015
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,072
<SALES>                                        365,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               455,089
<CGS>                                          192,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  239,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               185,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,839
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,822
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Criminal No. 08-84-01-SM 

Rutilio Chavez Deleon 

 

 

ORDER REMITTING ASSESSMENT

Upon petition of the United States of America under the

provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3573, for remission of the balance of

the unpaid assessment imposed upon the defendant named above and

the Court being sufficiently advised herein, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the unpaid portion of the assessment imposed

against the defendant in the amount of $200.00, is remitted.

DATED: ___________________ _________________________

 Chief Judge, U.S. District Court

Case 1:08-cr-00084-SM Document 75 Filed 03/28/11 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**AMENDMENTTO THE EFJ, INC.**

**2005OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN**

 

The Company’s 2005 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan(the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows (capitalized terms used herein andnot defined herein shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such terms inthe Plan):

 

1.     The first sentence of Section 4(a) ofthe Plan shall be amended to read as follows:

 

“(a)   SharesAvailable.   Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(b): (i) theaggregate number of Shares that may be delivered pursuant to Awards grantedunder the Plan shall be 2,400,000, of which the maximum number of Shares thatmay be delivered pursuant to Incentive Stock Options granted under the Planshall be 2,400,000 and (ii) the maximum number of Shares with respect towhich Awards may be granted to any Participant in any fiscal year of theCompany shall be 350,000.”

 

2.    Except as aforesaid, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Carey Carlberg, Jr.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-230-PB

NH Department of Safety, et al

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5.2

DOCUMENT/FILER: #32, Notice of Attorney Withdrawal, filed by James Donchess, Esq.

DATE FILED: December 5, 2008

The document above fails to comply with: 

LR 83.6(d) Motion to withdraw appearance is required if certain conditions exist

It is herewith ordered that the document is stricken, and Motion to Withdraw must be filed. 

SO ORDERED.

December 10, 2008

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00230-PB Document 33 Filed 12/10/08 Page 1 of 1
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2005...... 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.7 7.5 7.1 6.5 2006...... 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.0 2007...... 8.3 8.6 8.3 8.5 8.5 7.6 9.0 9.0 8.7 8.0 2005: Q1... 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.9 6.9 5.7 7.3 6.9 6.9 6.4  Q2... 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.0 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q3... 6.7 6.9 6.8 7.1 6.9 5.8 7.7 7.6 7.1 6.3  Q4... 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7 6.7 8.3 8.1 7.7 7.1 2006: Q1... 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 7.3 8.5 8.5 8.2 7.8  Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.6 8.8 8.5 7.8  Q3... 8.6 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.3 9.3 9.2 8.7 8.4  Q4... 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 7.5 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.1 2007: Q1... 8.5 8.9 8.3 8.7 8.9 8.1 9.2 9.1 8.8 8.4  Q2... 8.6 9.0 8.5 8.9 8.7 7.9 9.2 9.1 8.9 8.4  Q3... 8.5 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.4 7.7 9.1 9.2 8.8 8.1  Q4... 7.7 8.2 8.1 7.8 8.1 6.9 8.6 8.5 8.3 7.4 2008: Q1... 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.8 7.1 5.8 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q2... 5.7 5.5 5.8 6.1 5.9 4.9 6.7 6.4 6.2 5.4  Q3... 5.3 5.6 5.4 5.5 6.3 4.7 6.6 6.6 6.1 4.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dawn Scovill

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00226-JL

Stephanie Gray

 O R D E R

The parties shall file a single Discovery Plan as

contemplated by Rule 26(f) and Local Rule 26.1, indicating areas

of disagreement where applicable. The court does not wish to

create undue extra work for counsel, but a single plan, even with

areas of disagreement noted, facilitates the efficiency of the

Preliminary Pretrial Conference, as well as the court's drafting

of the follow-up order resolving any areas of disagreement.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: August 6, 2008

cc: David P. Cullenberg, Esq.

Wilfred J. Desmarais, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00226-JL Document 10 Filed 08/06/08 Page 1 of 1
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven L. Bromley

v. Civil No. 08-cv-161-JL

Utah, State of et al

O R D E R

After due consideration of Magistrate Judge Muirhead's recommendation and

the objection thereto, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation dated

February 17, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

March 3, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Steven L. Bromley, Pro se

John P. Soltis , III, Esq.

Joni J. Jones, Esq.

Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00161-JL Document 31 Filed 03/03/09 Page 1 of 1