alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael C. Dillon

v. Civil No. 07-cv-0070-JL

Select Portfolio

Servicing, Inc. et al.

O R D E R

The plaintiff, Michael C. Dillon, moves to reconsider this

court’s order granting summary judgment for the defendants on all

claims, invoking Rule 60(b). That rule authorizes relief from a

judgment on six different grounds, but Dillon does not attempt to

demonstrate any of them. Instead, he either recasts the same

arguments already rejected by the court in its prior order or

inappropriately makes new arguments in violation of the

applicable rule of procedure, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(6),

e.g., that the pre-settlement injunction in Curry somehow barred

him from seeking damages but not other relief in state court,

which are untimely and without merit. The motion (document no.

129) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: March 4, 2009

cc: Walter L. Maroney, Esq.

William P. Breen, Esq.

Dorothy A. Davis, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00070-JL Document 132 Filed 03/04/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-196-01-SM

Tamieka Lamos

O R D E R

Defendant Lamos’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 17). Trial has been rescheduled for the February

2006 trial period. Defendant Lamos shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than November 1, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, her continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: January 27, 2006 at 11:30 a.m.

Jury Selection: February 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00196-SM Document 18 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 24, 2005

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00196-SM Document 18 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Comcast of Maine

v. Case No. 06-cv-77-PB

Richard Groves

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41.1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with 

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

August 4 , 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00077-PB Document 6 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, J. Todd Hagely, hereby certify that the QuarterlyReport of Direct General Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Direct General Corporation.             November 7, 2006       By: /s/ J. Todd Hagely         Date   (Signature)    Name: J. Todd Hagely    Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-189-03-PB

Cirino Gonzalez

ORDER

Re: Document No. 433, Motion to Reschedule Date of Jury

Selection

Ruling: Jury selection was previously scheduled for June 18,

2008. On May 13, 2008, the Court held a conference of counsel on

attorney Bownes’s “Notice of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel”.

At the conference, attorney Bownes explained that he had a personal

matter to attend to outside of New Hampshire from June 16 to June

18, and he requested that jury selection be rescheduled. At that

time attorney Bownes stated that he would be available for jury

selection on June 19, 2008. Accommodating attorney Bownes’s

request, the Court rescheduled jury selection in this case to June

19, 2008. Attorney Bownes now indicates that he “mis-communicated

the dates that he was available for jury selection.” The Court

will not reschedule jury selection again. Motion denied.

 /s/ George Z. Singal 

Chief United States District Judge

Date: May 20, 2008

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 434 Filed 05/20/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1395 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1395

     To increase discretionary funding for certain grant programs 
   established under the ``Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law 
                   Enforcement Assistance Programs''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

 Mr. DeFazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To increase discretionary funding for certain grant programs 
   established under the ``Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law 
                   Enforcement Assistance Programs''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE DISCRETIONARY FUNDING FOR CERTAIN GRANT PROGRAMS 
              ESTABLISHED UNDER THE ``EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL STATE AND 
              LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS''.

    Section 1001(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
    ``(25) There is authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2002 to carry out subpart 2 of part E of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
*Release Date: March 31, 2006*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 6.1     | 6.1                    | 5.7                                |
| 6.3     | 6.3                    | 5.8                                |
| 6.4     | 6.3                    | 6.0                                |
| 6.6     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.8     | 6.8                    | 6.4                                |
| 7.1     | 7.1                    | 6.7                                |
| 7.4     | 7.3                    | 6.9                                |
| 7.7     | 7.7                    | 7.2                                |
| 8.1     | 8.0                    | 7.6                                |
||
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 7.3     | 6.8                    | 6.4                                |
| 7.3     | 7.1                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.5     | 7.3                    | 6.8                                |
| 7.7     | 7.5                    | 7.0                                |
| 8.1     | 7.9                    | 7.3                                |
| 8.4     | 8.2                    | 7.6                                |
||
| 4.6     | 4.9                    | 5.7                                |
| 5.7     | 6.1                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.0     | 6.2                    | 6.6                                |
| 6.2     | 6.6                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.7     | 7.0                    | 6.9                                |
| 7.1     | 7.3                    | 7.3                                |
| 7.4     | 7.7                    | 7.5                                |
| 7.9     | 8.0                    | 7.8                                |
| 8.8     | 8.8                    | 8.5                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         419,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,250,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                   561,279
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,859,351
<PP&E>                                         707,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                 459,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,812,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,672,290
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        12,631
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,815,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,812,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,492,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,281,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                211,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                    82,404
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    129,118
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .010
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .010


</TABLE>
accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold 

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce. 

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the 

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of 

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December 

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S. 

1974. 

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year 

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979— 

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs. 

4. Valued at current market exchange rates. 

3.13	 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1 

Millions of dollars, end of period 

2001 

Asset 1997 1998 1999 

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug.p 

1 Deposits .............................. 457 167 71 199 196 70 101 86 102 84 

Held in custody 

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 620,885 607,574 632,482 594,694 603,906 609,440 585,710 583,655 586,607 578,573 590,820 

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 10,763 10,343 9,933 9,397 9,343 9,289 9,235 9,154 9,100 9,100 9,100 

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional 3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not 

organizations. included in the gold stock of the United States. 

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury 

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value. 

80
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jeffrey Jordan

v. Civil No. 06-cv-222-PB

Verizon Services Corp.

ORDER

Re: Document No. 6, Defendant Verizon’s Motion to Extend

Date For Filing Its Response To Petitioner’s Petition

To Appeal Decision Of Finding Of Non Willful NonPayment Of Vacation Pay

Ruling: GRANTED. While defendant’s allegation of excusable

neglect is at best marginal, this court has a strong bias toward

determination of matters on the merits where, as here, there is

clearly no prejudice to the nonmoving party. The Clerk should

also mark the Motion for Default “moot”. 

James R. Muirhead

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Date: July 24, 2006

cc: Penny Sue Dean, Esq.

 Steven E. Hengen, Esq.

 

 

Case 1:06-cv-00222-PB Document 9 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIN LIN, a.k.a. Li Wei Huang,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73177

Agency No. A097-390-283

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010**

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Lin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

JUL 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73177

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the agency’s legal determinations and

we review for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d

1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that the threats Lin

received and the property damage her family suffered did not establish past

persecution. See Lim v. INS, 224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir. 2000) (unfulfilled threats

do not constitute persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s

conclusion that Lin reasonably could relocate within China, particularly given that

prior to her arrival in the United States, she lived without any problems in

Shanghai for an extended period of time with her two children. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.13(b)(2)(ii); Gomes v. Gonzales, 429 F.3d 1264, 1267 (9th Cir. 2005). 

Accordingly, Lin’s asylum claim fails. 

Because Lin did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that she did

not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v.

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that Lin is not

eligible for CAT relief because she failed to show that it is more likely than not 
3 07-73177

that she would be tortured if removed to China. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-

68.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### J. R. HUNTER, Jr., as Director of the Florida State Beverage Department, Appellant, v. Frank E. SOLOMON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 10, 1954.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., John C. 'Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Yonge, Whiteside & Prunty, Miami, for appellee.

MATHEWS, Justice.

An appeal was prosecuted in this cause from a peremptory writ of mandamus and was regularly set for oral argument for Tuesday, September 7, 1954. Prior to the argument on appeal the appellee filed a motion to dismiss the cause for the reason that all matters contained therein had become moot, and there was attached to the motion a copy of a letter to the Florida State Beverage Department advising the Department that the relator had withdrawn and cancelled the application concerning the liquor license involved.

At the time of oral' argument on the appeal on September 7, 1954, all notice with reference to the motion to dismiss the appeal was waived and the parties proceeded to present and argue the motion to dismiss the appeal.

Upon consideration thereof it is ordered that the motion to dismiss the appeal be and the same is hereby granted, and the peremptory writ from which the appeal was prosecuted be and the same is hereby vacated, ' without passing upon the questions of fact of law involved in said appeal.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THtts 01:>-. '. 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 'D;ST({lb~~~ (;N~W\· FILED . 

Connecticut River Bank, NA Z008 HAY 30 P ij: 32 

v. Case No. 07-cv-410-PB 

Daniel J. McDonald, et al 

ORDER 

This case was transferred to the US District Court from the Grafton County Superior 

Court. Funds on deposit in that court totaling $93,692.68 have been transferred to the US 

District Court as of May 27, 2009 (receipt 31703). As the funds were previously in an 

interest-bearing account, the Clerk shall accept and deposit said funds into the Registry 

of the Court until further notice, 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall: 

1. Cause the funds to be invested in the Court Registry Investment 

System; 

2. Deduct a registry fee equal to ten percent (10%) ofthe interest earned 

on said funds pursuant to the directive of the Judicial Conference of the 

United States; and 

3. Deduct the registry fee prior to the disbursement of funds without 

further order of the Court. 

May 2lJ 2008 

~(L.~? Paul Barbadoro 

United States District Judge 

cc:	 Mark C. Russell, Esq. 

Daniel J. McDonald 

Ann M. McDonald 

Julie C. Avetta, Esq. 

Case 1:07-cv-00410-PB Document 16 Filed 05/30/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-133-01-SM

Francis Ndemi Mwangi

O R D E R

Defendant Mwangi’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 13). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 

2008 trial period. Defendant Mwangi shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than December 3, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: December 17, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 8, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00133-SM Document 15 Filed 11/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Steven J. McAuliffe

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

November 26, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00133-SM Document 15 Filed 11/26/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      2343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (2343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (2343)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>