alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S. Campney, Sr.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-297-JD

Bare Hill Correctional Facility,

Superintendent

Report and Recommendation

The order of 2007 directed New Hampshire authorities to

assure that petitioner’s legal work was transported to the New

Hampshire State Prison from the Bare Hill Correction Facility. 

It was not an ongoing “TRO”. Campney has not served his motion on

defense counsel and clearly has not exhausted administrative

remedies. I recommend that the motion be denied for failure to

comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.

If this Report and Recommendation is approved, the claims as

identified herein will be considered for all purposes to be the

claims raised in the complaint. If the plaintiff disagrees with

the identification of the claims herein, he must do so by

objection filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this Report

and Recommendation, or he must properly move to amend the

complaint. 

Case 1:06-cv-00297-JD Document 68 Filed 10/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United

States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 21, 2008

cc: Randy S. Campney, Sr.

 Stephen D. Fuller, Esq.

 Susan P. McGinnis, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00297-JD Document 68 Filed 10/21/08 Page 2 of 2
IB

Union Calendar No. 209

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1883

[Report No. 107–363]

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study

on water optimization in the Burnt River basin, Malheur River basin,

Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin, Oregon.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2001

Mr. WALDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

MARCH 4, 2002

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a

feasibility study on water optimization in the Burnt River

basin, Malheur River basin, Owyhee River basin, and

Powder River basin, Oregon.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1883 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burnt, Malheur,

3 Owyhee, and Powder River Basin Water Optimization

4 Feasibility Study Act of 2001’’.

5 SEC. 2. STUDY.

6 The Secretary of the Interior may conduct a feasi7 bility study on water optimization in the Burnt River

8 basin, Malheur River basin, Owyhee River basin, and Pow9 der River basin, Oregon.

10 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

11 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

12 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Union Calendar No. 209

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1883

[Report No. 107–363]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study on water optimization in

the Burnt River basin, Malheur River basin,Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin,Oregon.

MARCH 4, 2002

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50327 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
BENITO SUSTAITA

- CARDOZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CR

- 685

- 1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benito Sustaita

Cardoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sustaita

- Cardoza h a s not fil ed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 1 5 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50327 Document: 00513309048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015No. 15

- 50327

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50327 Document: 00513309048 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      12,699,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,923,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                   737,584
<INVENTORY>                                  2,718,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,837,534
<PP&E>                                       8,320,682
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,099,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,851,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,560,352
<BONDS>                                      2,850,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,831
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,348,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,851,220
<SALES>                                     10,277,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,277,993
<CGS>                                        3,864,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,864,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,642,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               675,501
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (235,870)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,330,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                   672,249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,658,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,658,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2261

ELPIDIA MANALANSAN CRUZ; SHERYLENE MANALANSAN CRUZ, Petitioners,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: April 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugo R. Valverde, VALVERDE & ROWELL, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Petitioners. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, Robbin Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Elpidia Manalansan Cruz and her daughter, Sherylene Manalansan Cruz, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their untimely motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. This court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008); INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Barry v. Gonzales , 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006). A denial of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with extreme deference, since immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor such motions. M.A. v. INS , 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc). We will reverse the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen only if the denial is “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.” Barry , 445 F.3d at 745. “[A]dministrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2006). The Board’s decision need only be reasoned, not convincing. M.A. , 899 F.2d

at 310. We find no abuse of discretion. Furthermore, we are without jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not to exercise its authority to sua sponte reopen the proceedings.

23 See Mosere v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). We further note there is no Fifth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel during the course of removal proceedings.

See Massis v. Mukasey , 549 F.3d 631, 637 (4th Cir. 2008); Afanwi v. Mukasey , 526 F.3d 788, 799 (4th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin T. Michaels, Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                       
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Kevin T. Michaels Chief Financial
Officer Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1937 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1937

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in certain 
    feasibility studies of water resource projects in the State of 
                              Washington.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1937

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in certain 
    feasibility studies of water resource projects in the State of 
                              Washington.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pacific Northwest Feasibility 
Studies Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may engage in the 
following feasibility studies:
            (1) The Tulalip Tribes Water Quality Feasibility Study, to 
        identify ways to meet future domestic and commercial water 
        distribution needs of the Tulalip Indian Reservation on the 
        Eastern Shore of Puget Sound, Washington.
            (2) The Lower Elwha Klallam Rural Water Supply Feasibility 
        Study, to identify additional rural water supply sources for 
        the Lower Elwha Indian Reservation on the Olympic Peninsula, 
        Washington.
            (3) The Makah Community Water Source Project Feasibility 
        Study, to identify ways to meet the current and future domestic 
        and commercial water supply and distribution needs of the Makah 
        Indian Tribe on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
    (b) Public Availability of Results.--The Secretary of the Interior 
shall make available to the public, upon request, the results of each 
feasibility study authorized under subsection (a), and shall promptly 
publish in the Federal Register a notice of the availability of those 
results.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 182

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the Eightmile River in the

State of Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 182

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate

a segment of the Eightmile River in the State of Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National

Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 182 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eightmile River Wild

3 and Scenic River Study Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

5 The Congress finds that—

6 (1) the Eightmile River in the State of Con7 necticut possesses important resource values, includ8 ing wildlife, ecological, and scenic values, and his9 toric sites and a cultural past important to Amer10 ica’s heritage;

11 (2) there is strong support among State and

12 local officials, area residents, and river users for a

13 cooperative wild and scenic river study of the area;

14 and

15 (3) there is a longstanding interest among

16 State and local officials, area residents, and river

17 users in undertaking a concerted cooperative effort

18 to manage the river in a productive and meaningful

19 way.

20 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

21 Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

22 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol23 lowing new paragraph:

24 ‘‘(138) EIGHTMILE RIVER, CONNECTICUT.—The seg25 ment from its headwaters downstream to its confluence

26 with the Connecticut River.’’.
3

•HR 182 EH

1 SEC. 4. STUDY AND REPORT.

2 Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

3 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(18) The study of the Eightmile River, Connecticut,

6 named in paragraph (138) of subsection (a) shall be com7 pleted by the Secretary of the Interior and the report

8 thereon submitted to Congress not later than 3 years after

9 the date of the enactment of this paragraph.’’.

10 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

11 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

12 as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN

NO.03-01-00550-CV

Consol idated Conce

pts, Inc., Appel

lant
v. Large & Sons Foundation Dril ling, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE COUN TY COUR T AT LAW N O. 1 OF

TRAVI S COUNTY NO. 255,352, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

Appe llant Con

sol i da ted Con ce pts , In c. , f i l ed an un opp ose d m

oti on to di sm i ss i ts appeal , expl ai

ni ng that the parties settled the c ase. The Co ur t gr an t s a pp ella nt ’s mo t io n a nd dis miss es it s a pp ea l. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 42.1(a )(2).

Jan P. Patterson, Justice Bef ore Justices K

idd, Patterson and Puryear Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: Apri l 18, 20022

Do No t Publis

h
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-60-PB

Peter Thomas

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

July 10, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to engage in plea negotiations. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 10, 2007 to August 21 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00060-PB Document 14 Filed 06/29/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on August

13, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED. 

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 29, 2007

cc: Philip Desfosses, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, Esq.

Peter Papps, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00060-PB Document 14 Filed 06/29/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

GORDON C. REID

v. C.A. No . 06-44S

WARREN F . DOWALIBY,

Superintendent, Strafford County

Department of Corrections, et als.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is a civil action pursuant to 42 U .S .C. § 1983, initiated by Plaintiff, Gordon C. Reid, a

federal pretrial detainee . Three motions are currently before the Court : Plaintiffs Motion to Amend

Complaint (Document No. 22), Plaintiffs Motion for Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant Steven

R. Monier, United States Marshal (Document No . 27) and Plaintiffs Motion for Copy of All

Notice(s) and Order(s) (Document No . 28). The Motions were referred to this Court for

determination. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); LR Cv 72(a). After review of the Motions and

independent research,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :

1 . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2), Plaintiffs Motion for Voluntary Dismissal as

to Defendant Steven R. Monier, United States Marshal (Document No . 27) is GRANTED absent

opposition, LR (D.N.H.) 7.1(b).

2. Pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint (Document

No. 22) is GRANTED absent opposition, LR (D .N.H.) 7 .1(b). Plaintiff shall file his Amended

Complaint, in the form attached as an exhibit to his Motion, within thirty (30) days of the date of

this Order.

Case 1:06-cv-00182-SM Document 32 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
3. Plaintiff s Motion for Copy of All Notice(s) and Order(s) is GRANTED . The Clerk

shall forward to Plaintiff a copy of every Notice or Order issued by this Court in this case .

ENTER: PER ORDER:

/s/ Lincoln D. Almond

LINCOLN D . ALMOND

United States Magistrate Judge

September 15, 2006

/s/ Jeannine Theall

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00182-SM Document 32 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2
*Release Date: March 31, 2005*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.5     | 6.4                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.3     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.2     | 6.1                    | 5.7                                |
| 6.1     | 6.1                    | 5.7                                |
| 6.3     | 6.3                    | 5.8                                |
| 6.4     | 6.3                    | 6.0                                |
| 6.6     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.8     | 6.8                    | 6.4                                |
||
| 7.2     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.0     | 6.9                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.9     | 6.8                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 7.3     | 6.8                    | 6.4                                |
| 7.3     | 7.1                    | 6.6                                |
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 5.8     | 6.0                    | 6.2                                |
| 5.2     | 5.3                    | 5.2                                |
| 5.1     | 5.3                    | 5.6                                |
| 4.6     | 4.9                    | 5.7                                |
| 5.8     | 6.2                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.0     | 6.2                    | 6.6                                |
| 6.2     | 6.6                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.7     | 7.0                    | 6.9                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
AO 442 ( Rev. 5/9 3) Warrant for Arrest

~YItfE~l ~t?ZfEB

DISTRICT OF NEW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

V.

Jay Miller

To: The United States Marshal

and any Authorized United States Office r

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to

arrest

Jay Miller

and bring him or her forthwith to the nearest magistrate judge to answer a(n)

Nam9

M Indictment [:] Information Q Complaint [:] Order of court ❑ Violation No

charging him or her with (bnef descdpuon of ortense)

Interstate transportation of stolen property

in violation of

Title(s) 18 United States Code, Section(s) 231 4

~_ s

Name Issinng Otficer~ a t a ( n Tltle pf Issuing Ofrioe r

dtl5suing ONker

DOCUMENT

WARRANT FOR ARREST

CASENUMBER: ")I My 7/ -Q /

Difd'and

Bail fixed at $ _ by

. ... .NameofJudicialOffice r

RETURN

This warrant was received and executed with the arrest of the above-named defendant at NO

RICHMOND, CA

Z7 ~J :

'

j

DATE RECEIVED NAME AND TITLE OF ARRESTING OFFICER SIONATURE OF ARRESTING OFFICtF~

06/2 9/07 WARRANT EXECUTED

__

DATE OF ARREST

Case 1:07-mj-00041-JM Document 4 Filed 07/29/09 Page 1 of 1