alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative,  Federal Trade Commission,  Premerger Notification Office,  Bureau of Competition,  Room H-303,  Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100. 

By Direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E8-22567 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
Presidential Documents

54487 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 184 

Monday, September 22, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of September 18, 2008 

Designation of Officers of the Council on Environmental 

Quality to Act as Chairman of the Council on Environmental 

Quality 

Memorandum for the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform 

Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that: 

Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of 

this memorandum, the following officials of the Council on Environmental 

Quality in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and 

duties of the office of the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality 

(Chairman), during any period in which the Chairman has died, resigned, 

or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the 

office of Chairman until such time as the Chairman is able to perform 

the functions and duties of that office: 

(a) Chief of Staff; 

(b) General Counsel; and 

(c) Associate Directors in the order that they shall have been appointed 

as such. 

Sec. 2. Exceptions. 

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an 

acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as the Chairman pursuant 

to this memorandum. 

(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Chairman unless that 

individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies 

Reform Act of 1998. 

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains 

discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in 

designating an acting Chairman. 

Sec. 3. Judicial Review. This memorandum is intended to improve the internal 

management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does 

not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at 

law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, 

agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with MISCELLANEOUS
54488 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 184 / Monday, September 22, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

Sec. 4. You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in 

the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 18, 2008 

[FR Doc. E8–22245 

Filed 9–19–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3125–W7–M 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JERRY W. LACKEY,

Defendant.

4:23CR3064

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s motion for temporary modification of pretrial release, 

(Filing No. 20), is granted.

2) Defendant is permitted to attend the birthday parties described in his 

motion on September 30, 2023 (the date provided during the 

hearing) and October 1, 2023.

Dated this 7th day of September, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03064-JMG-CRZ Doc # 30 Filed: 09/07/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 60
#### GOFF v. ZEIGLER.

No. 5437.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 1, 1937.

Joel L. Fletcher, of Colfax, for appellant.

C. H. McCain, of Colfax, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit for compensation under Act No. 20 of 1914, and amend■ments thereto. Defendant denied that plaintiff was in his employ at the time of the alleged injury. The lower court rejected plaintiff’s demands and he has appealed to this court.

The record does not contain a transcript of the testimony. We have before us only the petition, answer, and judgment. Plaintiff has filed a motion in this court to remand the case for trial de novo, basing his contention on the ground that he did not know the trial judge, who had been defeated for reelection, would be succeeded in office as soon as he was.

The case was tried without a stenographer to take the testimony, it being agreed between counsel at the time of trial that if an appeal was taken by either, upon request the trial judge would prepare a statement of facts to be filed in the record, in accordance with the law regarding statements of fact. Judgment was rendered on November 16, 1936, and plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis, immediately asked for an appeal, which was granted without bond and the return day fixed as of December 31, 1936.

The trial judge’s term of office expired on -December 7, 1936, without appellant requesting a statement of facts from him. The appeal was lodged here on December 30, 1936, and at that time appellant had made no offer to secure a statement of facts. As we gather from the meager record before us, it was not until April 21, 1937, that appellant made any offer to secure the statement of facts and that was done by' a motion in the lower court to- correct the minutes to show the agreement between counsel for plaintiff and defendant, as heretofore set out, and a request made on the trial judge, who no longer was a judge of the district, to furnish a statement of facts. The former judge, as shown by his statement filed here by appellant with his motion to remand, stated he was .without authority or right to take any further action in the casé.

If we assume as true all the allegations of appellant regarding the agreement between counsel as to the statement of facts, we are still without right in law to grant him any relief. The only -appeal prayed for by him was a devolutive one. Fie had twelve months from the date of judgment *703in which to ask for such an appeal. He saw fit to ask for it on the day the judgment was signed and it was granted without bond. After he had so perfected his appeal, it was too late for a statement of facts, even though he had requested it within a reasonable time, which he did not. Articles 602, 603, Dart’s Code of Practice, and the many decisions cited thereunder.

The motion to remand is overruled.

Since there is no testimony or statement of facts in the record, we presume the lower court proceeded upon proper evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1 estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2001: Q2... 8.6 8.6 n.a. 7.9

 Q3... 8.1 8.0 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.5 7.4 n.a. 7.2

2002: Q1... 7.5 7.3 n.a. 7.2

 Q2... 7.3 7.3 n.a. 7.1

 Q3... 7.2 7.2 n.a. 6.8

 Q4... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.5

2003: Q1... 6.7 6.6 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.0

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2001: Q2... 9.0 9.1 9.0 8.5

 Q3... 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.0

 Q4... 7.8 8.1 8.2 7.6

2002: Q1... 7.7 7.9 7.9 7.5

 Q2... n.a. 8.1 8.0 7.7

 Q3... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.5

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2003: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.3 6.9

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2001: Q2... n.a. 9.3 9.3 8.6

 Q3... n.a. 8.9 8.9 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 8.2 8.1 7.6

2002: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.7 7.3

 Q2... n.a. 7.6 7.7 7.4

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.2

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.2 6.9

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2001: Q2... 9.7 9.7 9.5 9.0

 Q3... 9.2 9.2 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.0

2002: Q1... 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.0

 Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.2 7.8

 Q3... 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.8

 Q4... 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.5

2003: Q1... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.5

 Q2... 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.2
38

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1 -estate loans estate loans

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2001: Q2... 8.6 11.0 8.5 8.3

 Q3... 8.2 7.9 8.0 7.6

 Q4... 9.9 7.2 7.2 7.0

2002: Q1... 7.0 7.1 9.4 7.3

 Q2... 7.5 7.3 7.5 7.2

 Q3... 7.3 6.9 7.3 7.2

 Q4... 6.8 6.7 7.0 6.7

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6

 Q2... 6.8 6.4 6.4 6.4

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1666 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1666

 To establish a uniform closing time for the operation of polls on the 
       date of the election of the President and Vice President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2001

  Mr. Quinn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a uniform closing time for the operation of polls on the 
       date of the election of the President and Vice President.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Uniform Poll Closing Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF UNIFORM POLL CLOSING TIME ON PRESIDENTIAL 
              ELECTION DAY.

    For each election of a President and Vice President held on the 
Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November (beginning with the 
election in 2004), the polls in each State (other than Alaska and 
Hawaii) and the District of Columbia shall close at 11 p.m. eastern 
standard time.
                                 <all>
```
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, FPercent except as noted

Loan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rate

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 681,410 113,790 171,471 143,801 45,384 31,402 24,78

Number of loans 20,626 3,425 5,689 4,872 1,427 929 74

Weighted average maturity (months)1 34.10 35.96 32.94 34.30 51.47 18.14 23.2

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 12.71 21.63 7.97 14.89 7.89 .46 10.9

Weighted average risk rating3 2.42 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.54 6.49 6.65 6.76 6.35 6.58 6.8 Standard error5 .14 .52 .20 .23 .53 .52 .5

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 7.38 7.50 7.25 7.50 7.75 6.45 8.0

 25th percentile 5.75 5.30 6.00 6.00 4.84 6.45 6.5

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.51 5.85 6.67 6.99 n.a. 6.64 7.9

 Other livestock 6.86 6.49 n.a. 7.06 7.63 n.a. 7.9

 Other current operating expenses7 6.54 6.12 6.77 7.03 6.43 6.57 7.0

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.80 6.38 6.60 6.86 7.46 n.a. 7.2

 Farm real estate 6.33 7.65 5.88 5.12 7.75 n.a. 4.8

 Other8 6.41 7.26 6.50 6.77 4.81 n.a. n.a

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 58.60 38.41 65.29 62.62 77.13 95.37 34.7

 Under commitment 45.63 21.37 59.60 53.12 58.01 16.89 38.6

 Callable 28.70 43.43 21.39 17.15 1.21 91.25 7.2

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.01 7.51 13.90 4.99 9.25 10.95 57.2

 Other livestock 4.61 4.07 4.21 2.61 3.27 9.12 46.3

 Other current operating expenses7 50.54 58.87 50.94 41.61 42.52 86.63 39.1

 Farm machinery and equipment 12.80 5.57 18.28 11.26 10.49 11.92 100.2

 Farm real estate 13.00 21.32 10.31 9.11 16.38 16.04 84.9

 Other8 10.04 2.66 2.35 30.43 27.34 16.56 n.a

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 24.15 41.86 14.84 33.42 16.38 7.42 12.1

 Other 72.63 56.99 77.40 63.28 82.53 91.86 84.2

 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

**********************************

*

Pamela Taber-McCarthy *

*

 Petitioner *

*

 v. * Case Number 1:08-cv-96-PB

*

Ricky C. McCarthy *

*

 Respondent *

*

**********************************

PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO MOVE FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

REPLY TO RESPONDENT’S OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR REMAND

The petitioner, Pamela Taber-McCarthy, hereby submits this notice of her 

intention to move for leave to file a reply to Respondent’s Objection to 

Petitioner’s Motion for Remand. 

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 8 Filed 04/05/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

Pamela Taber-McCarthy,

By her Attorney

MOSCA LAW OFFICE

/s/ Edward C. Mosca 

27 Webster Street

Manchester, NH 03104

(603) 628-3695

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 5, 2008 I served the foregoing by ECF on 

Kevin Bucholz, Esquire. Counsel of record for Respondent, and by handdelivering a copy to Law Office of Kathleen Sternenberg, 27 Webster Street, 

Manchester, NH 03104, counsel for Petitioner.

/s/ Edward C. Mosca 

Edward C. Mosca

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 8 Filed 04/05/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Gary F. Kimmons, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of M Power Entertainment Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

/s/  Gary F. Kimmons

Gary F. Kimmons
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer


DATED this 15th day of May, 2006.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Johnson, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 830]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered July 3, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant did not move to withdraw his plea, his challenge to the plea’s voluntariness is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Moreover, on appeal, defendant does not seek vacatur of the plea on the ground of involuntariness, and the only relief he requests is a more lenient sentence. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. The plea agreement called for a sentence of 4 to 8 years in the event that a drug treatment program did not accept defendant. The court *332warned defendant about the possibility that he might be rejected by the program, and the record fails to support defendant’s claim to the effect that he was “lured into pleading guilty by the offer of a drug program for which he had no chance of being accepted” *(People v Hardy,*290 AD2d 221 [2002], *lv denied*97 NY2d 755 [2002]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1994: Q1... 100 8.00 4.00 30.00 18.00 22.00 15.00 2.00 1.00 * * * * * * 1995: Q1... 100 * 2.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 7.00 27.00 27.00 15.00 11.00 * * .01 * 1996: Q1... 100 * 4.00 23.00 5.00 19.00 26.00 18.00 4.00 1.00 .01 * * .01 * 1997: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 10.00 31.00 33.00 17.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1998: Q1... 100 * .01 13.00 4.00 23.00 32.00 22.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q1... 100 .01 4.00 17.00 17.00 29.00 23.00 9.00 2.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 2000: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 4.00 30.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00 2002: Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * *  Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * *  Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * *  Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * *  Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * *  Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * *  Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest rfrom the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Darrell J. LaRue

v.

New Hampshire State Prison,

Lakes Region Facility, Warden

No. 07-fp-096

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv- 096-SM .

SO ORDERED.

__________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 9, 2007

cc: Darrell J. LaRue, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00096-SM Document 4 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 1

LaRue v. NH State Prison, Lakes Region Facility, Warden Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com