alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2002: Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9  Q2... 44.4 4.9 3.8 22.9 4.3 8.4 4.0 5.4 13.1 21.9  Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Q4... 55.2 11.1 6.0 24.1 2.9 11.1 3.3 5.4 14.6 31.9 2004: Q1... 72.2 5.2 5.4 39.7 6.7 15.1 3.1 5.0 14.9 49.1  Q2... 60.2 3.8 4.7 30.2 3.9 17.6 4.0 6.5 13.0 36.7  Q3... 54.2 2.3 7.3 21.1 5.9 17.6 3.5 5.3 10.3 35.1  Q4... 71.0 12.6 9.2 28.6 7.4 13.2 2.6 4.8 14.7 48.9 2005: Q1... 55.2 5.3 5.3 34.4 2.5 7.7 2.4 4.2 13.7 34.8  Q2... 76.6 7.7 3.7 29.9 11.0 24.3 3.8 5.9 12.7 54.1  Q3... 59.1 3.4 6.1 24.4 10.1 15.2 3.2 4.7 12.6 38.7  Q4... 46.4 10.2 5.5 18.8 3.2 8.7 2.2 4.1 11.0 29.1 2006: Q1... 67.0 5.3 6.2 40.2 4.5 10.9 2.9 4.7 14.3 45.1  Q2... 80.2 5.0 6.2 34.8 16.6 17.7 3.3 6.7 15.4 54.7  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
                                 Estimated volume                  Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                               (percent)
                      _______________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
1994......    |          69      10      11       15       33      .187      .026      .032     .037      .082
1995......    |          51      -2      14       13       25      .131     -.004      .039     .032      .061
1996......    |          95      16      27       24       30      .240      .039      .070     .058      .071
1997......    |          93       6      19       19       50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4      15       24       45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18      37       35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11      17       34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67      53      140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40      50       58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34      35       48       58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28      17       46       38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |        n.a.       8      16     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      n.a.      .035     n.a.      n.a.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
LETTER
AGREEMENT


 


September
5, 2019


 


Carlos
J Nissensohn


 


Re:
Consulting Agreement Extension


 


Dear
Mr. Nissensohn,


 


Reference
is made to the Consulting Agreement entered into by and between Quest Solution, Inc. (the “Company”) and Carlos J
Nissensohn or an entity under his control, dated August 2, 2017 (the “Consulting Agreement”).


 


The
Company and Mr. Nissensohn hereby
agree pursuant to this Letter Agreement, that the term of the Consulting Agreement shall be extended for two (2) years until September
5, 2021, on the same terms as the Consulting Agreement. At that time, the term of the Consulting
Agreement shall automatically extend for an additional two (2) year term unless the Consulting Agreement is terminated at the
option of either party. As consideration for entering into this Letter Agreement and in light of Mr. Nissensohn’s significant
contributions to the Company, the Company shall, pursuant to the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, grant Mr. Nissensohn
a signing bonus in the form of 550,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.


 


Additionally,
the Company agrees, for the duration of the Consulting Agreement, to assume and pay the compensation owed by HTS Image Processing,
Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiary, to Mr. Nissensohn in the amount of $10,000 per month.


 


This
Letter Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of New York, without giving effect to any conflict of laws provision,
and may not be amended other than through a written agreement executed by Quest Solution, Inc and Carlos
J Nissensohn.


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	QUEST
    SOLUTION, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Shai Lustgarten
	 	Name:	Shai
    Lustgarten
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


AGREED
AND ACCEPTED:


 


	/s/ Carlos
    Nissensohn	 
	Carlos
    J Nissensohn
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1983...... 1 1 2 3 7

1984...... 3 7 10 12 32

1985...... 12 21 17 18 68

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chad Evans

v. Civil No. 08-cv-105-JD

Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Chad Evans seeks relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The

Warden initially filed a motion for summary judgment in lieu of

an answer. After being directed to file an answer or otherwise

plead, the Warden filed an answer that does not comply with Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 5(c) and (d). The Warden

shall refile his answer, on or before June 1, 2010, in compliance

with all parts of Rule 5.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 19, 2010

cc: David M. Rothstein, Esquire

Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Esquire

Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 24 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 1
Order entered October , 2012

In The 

## Court of Rppealss jriftb IBiotritt of Texas; at Matta(

No. 05-12-01383-CR VARINA G. HARDIN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004-80250-2012



### ORDER The Court GRANTS 

### court reporter Claudia Webb's October 23, 2012 request for an extension of time to file the reporter's record. We ORDER 

### Ms. Webb to file the reporter's record within THIRTY DAYS 

### of the date of this order. The clerk's record is overdue. We also note that none of the boxes is checked on the copy of the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal that was forwarded to this Court. Accordingly, we ORDER 

### the Collin County Clerk to file the clerk's record within FIFTEEN DAYS 

### of the date of this order. The clerk's record shall contain a completed copy of the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal.We 

### DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Honorable David Rippel, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 4; Claudia Webb, official court reporter, County Court at Law No. 4; the Collin County Clerk; and counsel for all parties.

DAVID' L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Javier RODRIGUEZ-ORTEGA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-10097.

D.C. No. CR-01-00948-MHM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Javier Rodriguez-Ortega appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U. S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez-Ortega’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Rodriguez-Ortega knowingly and voluntarily waived his statutory right to appeal, and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. *United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir .2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker, as Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1 )   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2 )   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ Manuel  Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker* |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker        |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer              |   |
| May 10, 2010                                  |   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**WRITTEN CERTIFICATIONofCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of EFJ, Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certifies that, to the best of each of their knowledge:

 

a)                   theCompany’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30,2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)                  informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Michael E. Jalbert |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael E.  Jalbert          |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer     |
|   | November 06,  2003           |
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | /s/  Massoud Safavi     |   |
|   | Massoud  Safavi              |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer     |
|   | November 06,  2003           |

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  A signed original of this written statementor other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to EFJ, Inc. andsuch statement will be retained by EFJ, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD16


Marine Mammals; File No. 782-1702

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that NMFS National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070 has been 
issued an amendment to scientific research Permit No. 782-1702.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521;
    Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, BIN C15700, Bldg. 
1, Seattle, WA 98115-0700; phone (206)526-6150; fax (206)526-6426; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tammy Adams or Kate Swails, (301)713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An amendment to Permit No. 782-1702-04 has 
been granted under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 
1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the regulations 
governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The amended permit extends the duration of the permit through 
September 30, 2009 to allow continuation of research on harbor seals 
(Phoca vitulina), California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), and 
northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) in California, 
Washington, and Oregon. This minor amendment also revokes authority to 
take Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). This is the fifth 
amendment of the subject permit, which was issued originally issued on 
September 16, 2003 (68 FR 58663).
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-21988 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-170529) and Amendment No. 707 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial
    statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible
    payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  September 6, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David T. Veale

v. Civil No. 06-cv-419-PB

Robert T. Furness, DMV, et al

O R D E R

The case shall be removed from the trial list. 

SO ORDERED.

August 20, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: David T. Veale, pro se

James D. Gleason, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00419-PB Document 26 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-132-PB

Scott M. Annis

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for October 7, 2008, citing the need for

additional time to finalize plea negotiations. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from October 7, 2008 to December 2, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 20 Filed 10/01/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on November

19, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 30, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 20 Filed 10/01/08 Page 2 of 2
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
__________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2          Q3           Q4           Total
__________________________________________________________________________________

1983......    |             1           1           2             3              7
1984......    |             3           7          10            12             32
1985......    |            12          21          17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14          21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19          12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6          12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7           5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5           6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2           3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1           1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2           2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2           0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0           0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0           1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0           0             1              2
2003......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2004......    |             0           1           0          n.a.           n.a.
__________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1914 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1914

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
  To extend for 4 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277, as 
amended by Public Law 106-5, Public Law 106-70, and Public Law 107-8, 
is amended--
        (1) by striking ``June 1, 2001'' each place it appears and 
    inserting ``October 1, 2001'', and
        (2) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by striking ``June 30, 2000'' and inserting ``May 31, 
        2001'', and
            (B) by striking ``July 1, 2000'' and inserting ``June 1, 
        2001''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on June 1, 2001.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```