alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of M Power Entertainment, Inc. and
Subsidiaries(FKA GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.)(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary F. Kimmons,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
     Company.

/s/ Gary F. Kimmons
____________________________________
Gary F. Kimmons
Chief Executive Officer
December 9, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

SEAN SKIBBER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 748 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2019-B9 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC.

Date:March 27, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Benchmark 2019-B9 Certifications
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 06-cv-322-JM

Seventeen Thousand Dollars ($17,000)

In U.S. Currency, More or Less

O R D E R

The United States moves to strike claimant’s claim and

answer in this in rem action as a sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P.

37(b). 

Background

On December 14, 2006, plaintiff served interrogatories and

requests for documents on defendant by serving them on his

attorney. After several follow-up requests were ignored

plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel (document no. 15). No

objection or response was made. The court ordered responses to

the discovery within ten business days. No responses were made. 

The motion for sanctions followed and claimant has failed to

respond to the motion. 

Discussion

Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) authorizes the court to strike

pleadings or enter a default against a party for failure to

Case 1:06-cv-00322-JM Document 17 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 2
2

comply with a discovery order. The appropriate sanction in an

asset forfeiture case is to strike the claimant’s claim and

answer. See United States v. $61,980.00 in U.S. Currency, 2004

WL 3048843 at *2 (D. Kan. Dec. 30, 2004). After nine months of

refusal of discovery and direct flouting of the court’s order, it

is clear that claimant has no intention of complying with the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or court orders. His claim and

answer are stricken. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 11, 2007

cc: David A. Horan, Esq.

 Robert J. Rabuck, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00322-JM Document 17 Filed 07/11/07 Page 2 of 2
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1991...... 100.0 4.3 7.6 32.2 39.2 13.3 2.5 .9 10.9 8.8 1.0 .7 1992...... 100.0 2.0 5.3 25.3 41.1 19.6 5.1 1.6 12.5 11.3 1.2 1.0 1993...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 27.8 40.4 18.4 4.6 1.3 12.3 12.3 1.2 1.1 1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 1998: Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 6.4 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 9.1 1.0 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 3.0 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 6.1 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.1 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.2 3.1 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.5 6.1 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

M. Regina Fahy, et al.

v. Case No. 05-cv-97-SM

NH Department of Safety, Commissioner

O R D E R

Order granting stay is vacated. The decision was granted in error as the court

mistakenly understood the request to seek only a short stay – i.e. to October 15, 2005,

rather then October 15, 2006. The motion for stay is denied.

SO ORDERED.

October 7, 2005 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Christine C. Wellington, Esq.

Melanie Marie Chaput, Esq.

Stephanie Anne Bray, Esq.

Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00097-SM Document 27 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard M. Nault

v. Case No. 04-cv-479-PB 

United States of America

O R D E R

The briefing is not adequate to permit a reliable resolution

of the issues raised by the pending motions. Both motions (doc.

no. 9 and 10) are denied without prejudice. The clerk shall set

a status conference. The parties shall be prepared at the

conference to describe the legal arguments on which they intend

to base their motions for summary judgment. The court will set a

schedule for the refiling of summary judgment motions at the

conference. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 14, 2006

cc: Robert Lucic, Esq.

Stephen J. Turanchik

Case 1:04-cv-00479-PB Document 20 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

v.

AQUAN SPEARMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 21 EM 2021

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May , 2021

, Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and Petitioner’s Application for Extraordinary Relief Under

the Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction Motion to Lift Detainer and for Release on House

Arrest is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,199
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   752
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    526,198
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,710
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,736
<LOANS>                                        978,483<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,653,285
<DEPOSITS>                                     678,970
<SHORT-TERM>                                   182,681
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             32,240
<LONG-TERM>                                    656,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,653,285
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,045
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,702
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   603
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,571
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,779
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,447
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,447
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,373
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.33
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,046
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,275
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        9
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,568
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,568
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>LOANS HELD TO MATURITY
</FN>



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1814 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1814

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 24, 2001

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Metacomet-
Monadnock-Mattabesett Trail extending through western Massachusetts and 
 central Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National 
                             Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Metacomet-Monadnock-Mattabesett 
Trail Study Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF METACOMET-MONADNOCK-MATTABESETT TRAIL FOR STUDY 
              FOR POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(____) Metacomet-Monadnock-Mattabesett Trail.--The Metacomet-
Monadnock-Mattabesett Trail, a system of trails and potential trails 
extending southward approximately 180 miles through western 
Massachusetts on the Metacomet-Monadnock Trail, across central 
Connecticut on the Metacomet Trail and the Mattabesett Trail, and 
ending at Long Island Sound.''.

SEC. 3. EXPEDITED REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    Notwithstanding the fourth sentence of section 5(b) of the National 
Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(b)), the Secretary of the Interior 
shall submit the study required by the amendment made by section 2 to 
Congress not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1770 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1770

 To prohibit the purchasing, issuing, or wearing of berets as standard 
  Army headgear (other than for certain specialized units) until the 
 Secretary of the Army certifies to Congress that the Army ammunition 
                     shortfall has been eliminated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2001

Mr. Bartlett of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Paul, Mr. Camp, 
Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Ehrlich, Mr. Everett, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
Hayworth, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Traficant, Mr. 
  Weldon of Flordia, and Mr. Jones of North Carolina) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the purchasing, issuing, or wearing of berets as standard 
  Army headgear (other than for certain specialized units) until the 
 Secretary of the Army certifies to Congress that the Army ammunition 
                     shortfall has been eliminated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATIONS ON PURCHASE, ISSUE, AND WEARING OF BERETS.

    (a) Limitations.--Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), 
the Secretary of the Army may not--
            (1) enter into a contract for the purchase of any berets 
        for issue as Army headgear;
            (2) authorize or require the wear of a beret as standard 
        Army headgear; or
            (3) issue a beret for use as standard Army headgear.
    (b) Termination of Limitation Upon Certification That Ammunition 
Shortfall Has Been Eliminated.--The limitations in subsection (a) shall 
cease to apply upon the submission by the Secretary of the Army to 
Congress of a certification that, as of the date of the submission of 
the certification, any shortfall of stores of Army ammunition has been 
eliminated.
    (c) Exception for Specialized Units.--The limitations in subsection 
(a) shall not apply with respect to a beret to be worn by members of 
the Army assigned to, or serving with, specialized units for which, as 
determined by the Secretary, the wear of a beret or other distinctive 
headgear is customary and for which the wear of a distinctive beret is 
specifically authorized by the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Mark Goldwasser     |
|----------------------------------------|
| Mark                Goldwasser         |
| Chief                Executive Officer |
| May                15, 2008            |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-14-PB

Daniel Forlizzi

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 1, 2007 trial in the above case for 120 days, citing the need

for additional time to complete discovery and prepare a defense. 

The government does not object to a continuance of the trial

date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 1, 2007 to September 5, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00014-PB Document 9 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 20, 2007 final pretrial conference is continue to 

August 23, 2007 at 3:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED. 

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 6, 2007

cc: Michael C. Shklar Esq.

Robert Viega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00014-PB Document 9 Filed 04/06/07 Page 2 of 2
----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge              |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Paul Van Ostenbridge                  |   |
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                |                                  |   |
|                |                                  |   |
| Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Claire M. Chadwick                |   |
|                | Claire M. Chadwick                    |   |
|                | Senior Vice President and             |   |
|                | Chief Financial Officer               |   |

----