alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2004,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                            /s/ Robert P Johnson
                                Robert P. Johnson, President
                                AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                                Managing General Partner
                                November 10, 2004



                            /s/ Patrick W Keene
                                Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                                AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                                Managing General Partner
                                November 10, 2004
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2003: Q4... 15 58 27 31 59 10 13 80 7 17 76 8 11 54 

2004: Q1... 13 56 31 20 71 10 15 73 12 11 71 18 16 50  Q2... 17 60 22 26 64 10 18 73 9 12 74 14 15 63  Q3... 13 60 27 27 64 9 15 79 6 12 66 22 11 58  Q4... 9 58 33 14 75 10 12 81 7 10 77 13 10 50 2005: Q1... 9 61 30 16 72 12 11 80 9 12 78 9 9 52  Q2... 14 62 24 21 70 9 12 82 7 18 68 15 9 58  Q3... 10 57 33 16 73 11 7 89 5 14 63 23 9 42  Q4... 10 51 39 17 65 17 12 83 5 17 67 16 7 39 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2003: Q4... 18 68 13 22 62 16 17 80 3 14 84 2 10 76 

2004: Q1... 11 70 19 13 75 12 11 83 6 11 86 3 11 72  Q2... 16 68 16 27 60 13 15 81 4 11 85 4 15 70  Q3... 16 61 23 23 61 16 11 84 4 7 83 10 9 64  Q4... 12 71 17 13 72 15 11 89 0 9 84 7 7 74 2005: Q1... 12 69 19 19 66 15 16 80 4 11 84 5 11 68  Q2... 15 69 15 15 74 12 13 80 2 8 82 5 10 72  Q3... 12 67 21 17 68 15 12 81 1 7 83 5 8 70  Q4... 12 73 15 17 64 19 12 79 4 13 76 6 12 69 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2003: Q4... 21 74 5 12 82 6 17 78 6 15 75 10 14 82 

2004: Q1... 10 81 10 17 61 22 24 71 6 23 68 9 12 76  Q2... 4 92 4 0 89 11 0 94 6 9 86 5 8 84  Q3... 30 61 9 22 67 11 32 63 5 39 57 4 23 69  Q4... 22 65 13 18 71 12 17 72 11 13 78 9 20 60 2005: Q1... 18 73 9 19 71 10 14 81 5 4 96 0 16 68  Q2... 11 67 22 7 87 7 27 73 0 19 81 0 11 67  Q3... 24 71 5 6 89 6 13 88 0 11 11 0 5 19  Q4... 28 61 11 14 71 14 20 80 0 13 75 13 26 58  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55064-55065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER99-2311-010; ER97-2846-013]


Carolina Power & Light Company; Florida Power Corporation; Notice 
of Filing

September 17, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 11, 2008, Progress Energy Inc. 
(Progress Energy), on behalf of its public utility affiliates, Carolina 
Power & Light Company (PEC) and Florida Power Corporation (PEF) filed a 
supplemental filing to its September 2, 2008 filing to revise three 
additional market-based rate (MBR) tariffs on file with the Commission 
but no longer used by PEC and PEF. Progress Energy is also submitting 
clean and redlined versions of PEF's and PEC's MBR tariffs that were 
not submitted in its September 2, 2008 filing.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for

[[Page 55065]]

review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. 
There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to 
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afe9eafdece0c1c3c6c1cafcdadfdfc0dddbefc9caddcc81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e7a1a2b5a4a8898b8e8982b4929797889593a781829584c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 2, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22285 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      10.9**




**AMENDMENT
      TO MASTER FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT**




This
      Amendment to Master Framework Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into
      effective as of the 15th day of August, 2006 (the “Effective Date”), by and
      between TXU Electric Delivery Company, a Texas Corporation (“TXU ED”), and
      InfrastruX Energy Services Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“IES”). TXU
      ED and IES are also referred to herein individually as a “Party” and
      collectively as the “Parties.”




**RECITALS**




WHEREAS,
      the Parties entered into that certain Master Framework Agreement, dated June
      24,
      2006 (as amended to date, the “Agreement”); and




WHEREAS,
      the Parties desire to amend a certain defined term set forth in the
      Agreement.




NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and subject to the terms
      and
      conditions herein set forth, the Parties agree as follows.




**AGREEMENT**




1.  Amendment .  The
      term “Oncor” shall be amended to read “TXUED” wherever it occurs in the
      Agreement. The parties shall amend and restate the Agreement to reflect only
      the
      provisions of this Amendment.




2.  Full
      Force and Effect .
      Except as specifically amended and modified hereby, the Agreement shall remain
      in full force and effect.




3.  Counterparts .
      This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which is an
      original and all of which constitute one and the same instrument.












IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the
      Effective Date. This Amendment shall not become effective as to either Party
      unless and until executed by both Parties.









**TXU
                ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY**By:
            /s/
                James A. GreerName:
            James
                A. GreerTitle:
            Vice
                President, Asset Management & Engineering












**INFRASTRUX
                ENERGY SERVICES**
              **GROUP
                LP**By:
            **InfrastruX
                Energy GP, LLC, its general partner**By:
            **InfrastruX
                Group, Inc., its member**By:
            /s/
                Michael T. LennonName:
            Michael
              T. Lennon








By:
            **TXU
                Asset Services Group Management LLC, its general
                partner**By:
            /s/
                James A. GreerName:
            James
                A. GreerTitle:
            Senior
                Vice President
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI# I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NOS. CAAP-17-0000451 AND CAAP-19-0000664

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
CAAP-17-0000451 NICOLETA JACOBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BENNETT JACOBY, Defendant-Appellant, AND CAAP-19-0000664 NICOLETA JACOBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BENNETT JACOBY, Defendant-Appellant,

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (FC-D No. 08-1-281K)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Nakasone, J., for the court 1 ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Summary Disposition Order entered on April 20, 2021 (docket no. 89) in CAAP-17-0000451 and (docket no. 75) in CAAP-19-0000664 is hereby corrected as follows: 1. On pages 1 - 14, a header should be inserted at the top of each page so that as corrected, the text reads: "NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI # I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ".

1 Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Nakasone, JJ . Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000451 21-APR-2021 07:58 AM Dkt. 91 OCORNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI# I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER The clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 21, 2021.
FOR THE COURT: /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Somero Enterprises, Inc.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-030-JM

James Griffin, d/b/a 

Griffin Concrete Contractors

O R D E R

 Defendant defaulted. A damage hearing was held upon

plaintiff’s motion to assess damages. Defendant did not appear.

Plaintiff’s proffer established its entitlement to damages as

follows:

2007 Somero Copperhead XD

with Accessories $52,219.97

2007 Somero Power Rake

with Tires 46,580.00

Sales Tax 6,916.00

TOTAL $105,715.97

Less Check -10,000.00

Net $ 95,715.97

Plaintiff is awarded judgment in the amount of $95,715.97,

together with taxable interest and costs.

Case 1:08-cv-00030-JM Document 20 Filed 09/11/08 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 11, 2008 

cc: Margaret M. Pinkham, Esq.

 Steven M. Veenema, Esq.

 James Griffin, pro se 

 

 

Case 1:08-cv-00030-JM Document 20 Filed 09/11/08 Page 2 of 2
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: October 04, 2006
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0001023877
<NAME>                                   Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
#### Desiree Gagliardotto et al., Appellants, v Huntington Hospital et al., Defendants, and Donna M. Schneider, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 430]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), entered May 27, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant Donna M. Schneider and against them, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs contend that the trial court should have precluded the testimony of the respondent’s expert because it varied from the expert witness statement served before trial. We disagree. CELR 3101 (d) (1) (i) requires a party, upon request, to “identify each person whom the party expects to call as an expert witness at trial and . . . disclose in reasonable detail the subject matter on which each expert is expected to testify, the substance of the facts and opinions on which each expert is expected to testify . . . and a summary of the grounds for each expert’s opinion.” The expert witness statement served by the respondent did not specifically indicate that the expert would testify that an infant’s rapid descent during the second stage of delivery could cause Erb’s Daisy. However, the statement did disclose that the expert would testify that “maternal expulsive forces” could cause Erb’s Daisy. The statement also indicated that the expert could be “expected to comment upon any and all testimony adduced at trial by [the] plaintiff,” and two of the plaintiffs’ witnesses offered opinions as to whether or not rapid descent could cause Erb’s Daisy. Under these circum*759stances, the expert witness statement was not so inadequate or inconsistent with the expert’s testimony as to have been misleading, or to have resulted in prejudice or surprise *(see Andaloro v Town of Ramapo,*242 AD2d 354 [1997]; *Beard v Brunswick Hosp. Ctr.,*220 AD2d 550 [1995]; *Hageman v Jacobson,*202 AD2d 160 [1994]). Thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to preclude the testimony of the respondent’s expert *(see McGlauflin v Wadhwa,*265 AD2d 534 [1999]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                  5 



         

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION,  INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES,  FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               1,892
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,526
<INVENTORY>                                          5,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,215
<PP&E>                                              72,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     393,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               24,726
<BONDS>                                            205,801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         129,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       393,346
<SALES>                                             71,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    71,368
<CGS>                                               46,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       46,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       544
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
                                 

<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        







                                  



</TABLE>
t

r

RUG-22-2006 13 :54 WDL SYSTEMS

W1JL WDL Systems

Sy,

S Y S T E fS I: c) x 990030

Charlotte, NC 2.E3289-003 (919) 545-..2500

SOLD TO

DA9PT9

A:I.r,4orithin COnSLllt :Lnfg

AT• rN: ACCOUNTS PAYA1il_E

67 Old Rockinqham Fir1

Salern, NN

03Ci79

INVOICE UATE SHIPPEIYOATE

02/05/04 08/05/04

PACKING>< I TERMS

r'20406- . O : TErIPORARY

710022655E3C6AE 71002277DE84586 8825016D336D722 I 882501799D52 7

SHIPPING . FIANDLINO & INSURANCE 50.00

NN600042700666 NN600042701965 75001683E34C480 7500167A0571F'F

5

-4ESaousleurtv :OR eoem kseee a cus~CM4 F uvon!)ewmvev wa. avami -ox C4RRI&a

nr1E Does HOr/a1691NRL QOOPSFRE R4S IN RM2

DESCRIPTION

us

INVOIC E

F80093

LINDS

PRICE I TOTAL

01400 IIX--400 w/12 rio Anti Virus 13 ;,330 .00 26p660 .00

9195452559 P .02

SHIP TO

DA9PT9

Alqor•i.thm Cansult1nt,7

A'T'TNa Ch ris Spen c:t:

67 Old Fiocki.rxi7ham Rd

Salem, NI. 4

0.:,079

WDL Systems is an Equal Opportunity Employer

TOTAL P .02
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1749

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 685 Turnberry Road in

Newport News, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herbert H.Bateman Post Office Building’’.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1749

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1749 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Herbert H. Bate5 man Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 9,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.