alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, November 1-5, 2004Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,513,777 161,786 346,169 557,250 282,612 64,403 11,09Number of loans 29,402 3,043 5,103 12,288 4,481 1,127 80Weighted average maturity (months)1 20.45 13.30 19.63 22.35 25.24 8.79 15.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 5.94 5.29 9.62 5.21 4.11 .36 13.Weighted average risk rating3 2.82 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 nWeighted average interest rate4 5.62 6.92 5.41 5.43 5.45 5.80 6.4 Standard error5 .22 .48 .43 .21 .27 .59 .4 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.76 7.50 6.17 6.45 6.37 6.17 7.2 25th percentile 4.31 6.61 4.08 4.27 4.54 4.85 5. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.46 5.86 5.88 5.39 5.32 5.54 6. Other livestock 5.22 5.91 4.59 6.21 4.61 6.12 6. Other current operating expenses7 6.02 7.28 5.54 5.59 5.62 6.21 6.0

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.51 6.60 7.25 5.15 5.77 5.39 6.7 Farm real estate 6.19 2.01 5.75 6.37 6.21 5.78 7.0 Other8 4.90 5.95 5.67 4.54 4.52 5.19 6.7

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 72.49 54.91 46.12 84.09 91.14 96.84 23.5 Under commitment 79.82 83.63 75.98 77.25 85.61 97.68 32.2 Callable 25.61 11.28 56.49 18.70 8.44 2.22 40.4 Subject to prepayment penalty 4.56 .25 .45 7.78 8.38 .01 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 16.07 20.77 21.61 14.61 7.33 1.15 6.0 Other livestock 11.61 1.39 27.93 6.93 7.40 3.26 1. Other current operating expenses7 38.52 73.35 25.27 34.19 47.05 50.21 49.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.39 2.10 1.60 13.09 14.56 20.63 3.5 Farm real estate 8.28 .13 7.61 11.71 9.74 4.14 9. Other8 16.13 2.25 15.99 19.48 13.92 20.61 29.9

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 10.08 4.01 9.32 11.59 11.93 1.95 9.7 Other 84.86 94.16 85.79 80.05 86.64 95.11 89.0 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




September 2017


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: February 7, 2018
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to his/her knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.













/s/  Walter S. Woltosz


Walter S. Woltosz


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


January 13, 2011








/s/  Momoko A. Beran


Momoko A. Beran


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


January 13, 2011





(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1886

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for appeals by third parties in certain patent reexamination

proceedings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1886 RFS

1 SECTION 1. APPEALS IN INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION

2 PROCEEDINGS.

3 (a) APPEALS BY THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER IN PRO4 CEEDINGS.—Section 315(b) of title 35, United States

5 Code, is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(b) THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER.—A third-party

7 requester—

8 ‘‘(1) may appeal under the provisions of section

9 134, and may appeal under the provisions of sec10 tions 141 through 144, with respect to any final de11 cision favorable to the patentability of any original

12 or proposed amended or new claim of the patent;

13 and

14 ‘‘(2) may, subject to subsection (c), be a party

15 to any appeal taken by the patent owner under the

16 provisions of section 134 or sections 141 through

17 144.’’.

18 (b) APPEAL TO BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND

19 INTERFERENCES.—Section 134(c) of title 35, United

20 States Code, is amended by striking the last sentence.

21 (c) APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FED22 ERAL CIRCUIT.—Section 141 of title 35, United States

23 Code, is amended in the third sentence by inserting ‘‘, or

24 a third-party requester in an inter partes reexamination

25 proceeding, who is’’ after ‘‘patent owner’’.
3

•HR 1886 RFS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act apply with respect

3 to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 5,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

** **

****

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

** **

** **

I, Joseph A. Venezia,do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certifyon behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,dated as of January 30, 2019 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A, as Issuing Entity,World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)                 A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement,has been made under my supervision.

 

(ii)               To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 6, 2020.

 

 

WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.

 

 

By: /s/ Joseph Venezia                            

Name: Joseph Venezia

Title: Chief Financial Officer
---

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41993
          24
          2
          4
          7
          11
          .121
          .010
          .018
          .035
          .0541994
          10
          1
          1
          3
          6
          .048
          .003
          .003
          .013
          .0261995
          12
          0
          3
          6
          4
          .055
          -.001
          .011
          .027
          .0161996
          7
          0
          1
          2
          4
          .031
          .000
          .003
          .009
          .0171997
          16
          -1
          0
          3
          14
          .064
          -.003
          -.001
          .010
          .0541998
          6
          -1
          3
          0
          5
          .022
          -.004
          .009
          .000
          .0161999
          15
          0
          3
          5
          7
          .051
          -.001
          .011
          .015
          .0222000
          12
          -12
          3
          8
          14
          .037
          -.037
          .009
          .022
          .0402001
          42
          10
          9
          5
          17
          .123
          .030
          .027
          .014
          .0492002
          35
          8
          6
          5
          16
          .097
          .022
          .017
          .014
          .0412003
          32
          4
          6
          8
          14
          .082
          .010
          .015
          .021
          .0342004
          n.a.
          1
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .003
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 30, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-31-01-SM

Nicole Gennell,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Gennell’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no. 

20). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of August 2008. Defendant

Gennell shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than June 13, 2008. 

On the filing of such waiver, her continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00031-SM Document 21 Filed 06/02/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for July 23, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. 

Jury selection will take place on August 5, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 2, 2008

cc: Kevin Sharkey, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00031-SM Document 21 Filed 06/02/08 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1749

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herbert H.

Bateman Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. SCOTT, Mr.

GOODE, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr.

BOUCHER, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government

Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HERBERT H. BATEMAN POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING.

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

6 Postal Service located at 685 Turnberry Road in Newport
2

•HR 1749 IH

1 News, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the

2 ‘‘Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Herbert H. Bateman

7 Post Office Building.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1762 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1762

        To restore the second amendment rights of all Americans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To restore the second amendment rights of all Americans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Amendment Protection Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FEDERAL HARASSMENT PERIOD.

    Public Law 103-159 is hereby replaced, and any provisions of law 
amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act 
had not been enacted.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUN BAN.

    Title XI of Public Law 103-322 is hereby repealed, and any 
provisions of law amended or repealed by such title are restored or 
revived as if such title had not been enacted.

SEC. 4. REPEAL OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTION.

    (a) Section 201 of title 11 of Public Law 90-618 is amended by 
striking ``which the Secretary finds is generally recognized as 
particularly suitable for sporting purposes,'' and ``which the owner 
intends to use solely for sporting purposes.''
    (b) Public Law 90-351, as amended, is amended as follows:
            (1) In section 902, strike ``which the Secretary finds is 
        generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting 
        purposes,'' ``which the owner intends to use solely for 
        sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes,'' ``a projectile 
        which the Secretary finds is primarily intended to be used for 
        sporting purposes,'' ``devoted to the collection, competitive 
        use, or other sporting use of firearms in the community,'' 
        ``determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be 
        particularly suitable for sporting purposes and,'' ``(A) 
        determined by the Secretary to be generally recognized as 
        particularly suitable for sporting purposes, or determined by 
        the Department of Defense to be a type of firearm normally 
        classified as a war souvenir, and (B),'' ``and is generally 
        recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to 
        sporting purposes,'' and ``provided that such handguns are 
        generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily 
        adaptable to sporting purposes,''.
            (2) Strike ``lawful sporting purposes'' and insert in lieu 
        thereof ``lawful purposes''.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of this Act shall take effect immediately upon 
enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion filed December 1, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-11-00194-CV

__________

MARVIN RAY HAILE, Appellant

V.

VERGIE LEE FELTON ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 47,781-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Marvin Ray Haile, filed a notice of appeal on July 25, 2011. However, a 

clerk‟s record has not been filed, and no filing fee has been paid. We dismiss the appeal for want 

of prosecution.

Upon receipt of appellant‟s notice of appeal, the clerk of this court notified him in a letter 

dated July 25, 2011, that a filing fee of $175 was due. This letter further advised appellant that 

the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within fifteen days. Appellant 

responded to the clerk‟s initial letter by filing a “Motion to File as „In Formia Pauperis‟” [sic] on
2

August 4, 2011. The court overruled this motion and notified appellant in a letter dated 

August 18, 2011. This letter further advised appellant to immediately forward the $175 filing 

fee. Appellant did not do so.

On September 16, 2011, the clerk notified appellant by letter that the clerk of the trial 

court had notified this court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the clerk‟s 

record. The clerk of this court requested that appellant forward proof by October 6, 2011, that he

made arrangements to pay for the clerk‟s record. The clerk‟s letter of September 16, 2011, also

informed appellant that the failure to provide the requested proof by the date indicated could 

result in the dismissal of this appeal. Additionally, the clerk wrote an additional letter to 

appellant on September 16, 2011, informing him that the failure to pay the required filing fee by 

October 6, 2011, could result in the dismissal of this appeal. There has been no response to the 

clerk‟s letters of September 16, 2011, other than various motions forwarded by appellant that 

have not been filed because appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee for this appeal or the $10 

filing fee for each motion. 

The failure to file the clerk‟s record and pay the required filing fee appears to be due to 

appellant‟s acts and omissions. Therefore, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) and 42.3(b), the 

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

December 1, 2011

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-92-PB

Fnu Lnu

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

November 6, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to negotiate a plea agreement. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from November 6, 2007 to December 4, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:07-cr-00092-PB Document 17 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 24, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to November 20, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 24, 2007

cc: Richard Monteith, Esq.

Alfred J.T. Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00092-PB Document 17 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: Feb 15, 2020 | By: | /s/ Saskya Bedoya        | 
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------ | 
|                   |     | Saskya Bedoya, President |
exv10w4



 










EXHIBIT 10.4




February 9, 2004




Marty Beard

SVP, Corporate Development & Marketing

Sybase, Inc.

One Sybase Drive

Dublin, CA 94568

(Delivered by hand)


Dear Marty:


The year 2004 marks our
20th anniversary and is a critical year for Sybase
growth. We have enjoyed several years of profitability, are cash flow
positive, and in the last six months, expanded our partner base to include
venerable companies like Intel and SAP. The Unwired Enterprise is our driving
strategy for 2004 — it is a pivotal part of extending growth in the IT
marketplace. We have exciting new products rolling out from every part of the
company, and the new Unwired Enterprise solution will define the mobile
enterprise category for the industry. We will need everyone’s help to ensure
that we make the most of our technology leadership and that we continue to
demonstrate a high level of unique value to customers and partners in all of
our programs.


Thank you for your contributions last year and ask that all of us keep sight of
the challenges ahead. More than ever, we need to remain focused and dedicated
to delivering growth and shareholder value required for Sybase to remain strong
and competitive. The board has approved our incentive bonus payout and your
bonus payout will be included in your February 15, 2004 paycheck.


Let me also inform you of your 2004 Executive Compensation as approved by the
Sybase, Inc. Compensation Committee at the February 4, 2004 meeting.




	 	1.	 	Cash compensation (effective January 1, 2004)





	 	•	 	Annual base salary: $321,000

(Paid semi-monthly at $13,375)
	 
	 	•	 	Incentive bonus target: 60.6% ($194,500)
	 
	 	•	 	Total target earnings (TTE): $515,500





	 	 	 	Your incentive bonus target will be based on Sybase, inc. overall
company performance as follows:





	 	•	 	50% on Sybase revenue of $817M
	 
	 	•	 	50% on Sybase profit before taxes (PBT) of $172




 









 




Marty Beard

February 9, 2004

Page 2



	 	 	 	Payment of annual incentive bonus will be based on
following:





	 	a)	 	Sybase revenue:





	 	•	 	70% at 95% of target performance
	 
	 	•	 	100% at 100%
	 
	 	•	 	3 for 1 after 100% (e.g. 130% at 110%)
	 
	 	•	 	no cap





	 	b)	 	Sybase PBT





	 	•	 	70% at 70% of target performance
	 
	 	•	 	100% at 100%
	 
	 	•	 	3 for 1 after 100% (e.g. 130% at 110%)
	 
	 	•	 	no cap





	 	2.	 	Long-Term Incentives





	 	(a)	 	Sybase Stock Option Grant (4-year vest):





	 	•	 	60,000 shares





	 	(b)	 	Sybase Restricted Stock Grant (3-year cliff vest
with performance acceleration, i.e. from 3-year cliff vest to
2-year cliff vest if Sybase meets its 2004 budgeted revenue):





	 	•	 	8,000 shares at $0.10 per share.



I look forward to your contributions this year as we continue our pursuit of
maintaining integrity and credibility with our investors, customers, partners,
and employees.



Sincerely,

/S/ JOHN S. CHEN

John S. Chen

Chairman, CEO and President



	 	 	 
	cc:

	 	HR File
	edl
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-42-PB

Edwin Ortiz

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the April 3, 2007 trial

in the above case, citing the need for additional time to resolve

outstanding state court charges, complete discovery, and prepare

a defense. The government does not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 3, 2007 to June 5, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00042-PB Document 10 Filed 03/27/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on May 23,

2007 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 26, 2007

cc: Peter Papps, Esq.

Michael Smith, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00042-PB Document 10 Filed 03/27/07 Page 2 of 2