alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-50-PB

Gene Stram

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

August 21, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize a plea agreement. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 21, 2007 to October 10, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00050-PB Document 13 Filed 07/16/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 23, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

September 17, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. 

No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 16, 2007

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00050-PB Document 13 Filed 07/16/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 

                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1


                     SUBSIDIARIES OF INLAND RESOURCES INC.

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                                                              STATE OF  
                                           PERCENTAGE       INCORPORATION
                 NAME                      OWNERSHIP       OR ORGANIZATION 
                 ----                      ----------      ---------------
<S>                                        <C>             <C> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inland Production Company                      100%             Texas
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Farmout Inc.                                   100%             Utah
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inland Gas Development Company                 100%             Utah
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
West Monument Butte Pipeline Company         83.86%             Utah
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Castle Peak Pipeline Company                 49.43%             Utah
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: May 16, 2011




By:  /s/ John Hummel


John Hummel


President (principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS Futures Management LLC


General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1992: Q4... 54.5 19.9 34.7 -2.9 -.2 -4.4 2.9 7.8 .2

1993: Q1... 52.8 20.0 32.8 -3.2 .5 -5.3 1.7 5.6 -.5

 Q2... 56.0 20.6 35.4 6.0 3.1 7.8 1.6 5.4 -.6

 Q3... 58.0 20.8 37.1 3.5 1.2 4.9 3.2 4.7 2.4

 Q4... 57.7 20.9 36.8 -.5 .1 -.8 5.8 5.0 6.2

1994: Q1... 56.8 21.2 35.5 -1.5 1.8 -3.4 7.6 6.4 8.3

 Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Q3... 91.5 43.9 47.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 6.9 9.2 4.9

 Q4... 92.3 44.5 47.7 .8 1.5 .2 7.1 9.6 4.9

2005: Q1... 89.3 45.0 44.3 -3.2 1.1 -7.2 5.9 8.7 3.3

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-106-PB

Haibaran Resaul

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

November 6, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to negotiate a plea agreement. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from November 6, 2007 to February 5, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

The October 29, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 22, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00106-PB Document 11 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 29, 2007

cc: Camille Russell, Esq.

Sandra Bloomenthal, Esq.

Albert Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00106-PB Document 11 Filed 10/29/07 Page 2 of 2
II

Calendar No. 428

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1886

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JUNE 20, 2002

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for appeals by third parties in certain patent reexamination

proceedings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1886 RS

1 SECTION 1. APPEALS IN INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION

2 PROCEEDINGS.

3 (a) APPEALS BY THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER IN PRO4 CEEDINGS.—Section 315(b) of title 35, United States

5 Code, is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(b) THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER.—A third-party

7 requester—

8 ‘‘(1) may appeal under the provisions of section

9 134, and may appeal under the provisions of sec10 tions 141 through 144, with respect to any final de11 cision favorable to the patentability of any original

12 or proposed amended or new claim of the patent;

13 and

14 ‘‘(2) may, subject to subsection (c), be a party

15 to any appeal taken by the patent owner under the

16 provisions of section 134 or sections 141 through

17 144.’’.

18 (b) APPEAL TO BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND

19 INTERFERENCES.—Section 134(c) of title 35, United

20 States Code, is amended by striking the last sentence.

21 (c) APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FED22 ERAL CIRCUIT.—Section 141 of title 35, United States

23 Code, is amended in the third sentence by inserting ‘‘, or

24 a third-party requester in an inter partes reexamination

25 proceeding, who is’’ after ‘‘patent owner’’.
3

HR 1886 RS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act apply with respect

3 to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 5,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 428

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1886

AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide

for appeals by third parties in certain patent reexamination proceedings.

JUNE 20, 2002

Reported without amendment
Exhibit








-15-
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This document amends the Employment Agreement entered into between Regis Corporation (“Regis”) and Jim B. Lain (“Lain”) dated November 11, 2013 (the “Agreement”) wherein Lain agreed to have his primary office in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Regis agreed to, and did, reimburse Lain for certain expenses related to his relocation to Minneapolis, Minnesota.  
Whereas, Regis and Lain hereby agree to amend the Agreement, effective January 1, 2019, to designate Lain’s primary office in the Atlanta, Georgia area and to additionally provide Lain with access to an office where Regis’ principal executive offices are, and which are currently located at 7201 Metro Boulevard in Edina, Minnesota.  Regis and Lain agree that there will be no relocation expenses paid to Lain in connection with his relocation to Atlanta.  Regis further agrees to reimburse Lain for his reasonable travel expenses between his primary office in the Atlanta, Georgia area and the Corporation’s principal executive offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota beginning January 1, 2019 and continuing through the remainder of the Employment Period.   
The parties intend this document to constitute an Amendment of the Employment Agreement in accordance with section 11(e) of the Employment Agreement solely with respect to the matters addressed in this document; the Employment Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with its terms in all other respects.


Date: August 23, 2019                    By: /s/ Hugh Sawyer
Its: President and CEO


Date: August 23, 2019                    By: /s/ Jim B. Lain
Name: Jim B. Lain
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,969,440
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,969,440
<PP&E>                                      11,977,273
<DEPRECIATION>                               (264,944)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,681,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          419,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,262,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,681,769
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,440
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                386,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            386,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   386,176
<EPS-BASIC>                                      22.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.29


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

St. Paul’s School

 v. Civil No. 08-cv-202

Fred C. Church, Inc.

O R D E R

I recuse myself from this case as Attorney Glahn is on my

recusal list.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 29, 2008

cc: Wilbur Glahn, III, Esq.

Jessica M. Farrelly, Esq.

William D. Chapman, Esq.

Maureen E. Lane, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00202-MML Document 12 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEPKE JONES a/k/a RODNEY BURCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2532

[April 21, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Gillen, Judge; 

L.T. Case Nos. 50-1989-CF-009936-AXXX-MB and 50-1989-CF-010442-

AXXX-MB.

Rachel E. Reese of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1749 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1749

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 10, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ``Herbert H. 
                    Bateman Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 685 
Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Herbert H. Bateman Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 9, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Charles E. Glenn

v. Civil No. 06-cv-99-PB

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, et al

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from this case.

SO ORDERED.

January 12, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq.

Harold J. Friedman, Esq.

Heidi A. Bean, Esq.

Jonathan A. Lax, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 31 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 1
U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT Of H.H. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT <f~ 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

ZOIZ t~.PR I 0 P 3: 4 I 

) 

GUARDIAN ANGEL CREDIT UNION, ) 

on its own behalf and on behalf of a ) 

class of persons similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MET ABANK, and 

META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 08-cv-261-PB 

FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT 

On the Plaintiff's Assented-To Motion to Approve Class Action Settlement (Document 

No. _!ll) ("Plaintiff's Motion"), and following hearing on the relief requested by such motion, 

the Court hereby FINDS and ORDERS as follows: 

1. Notice was provided to all members of the class pursuant to and in compliance with the 

prior Order of this Court, on the form found to be appropriate by this Court, and in full 

satisfaction with the requirements of Rule 23 and all other requirements of due process 

and law; 

2. All further requirements of statute, rule, and state and federal Constitutions necessary to 

effectuate the Proposed Settlement have been met and satisfied; 

3. Having heard from all parties interested at hearing, including class members, final 

certification of the Class is granted, the Class consisting of Class Members listed on the 

Class List attached to Plaintiff's Motion as Exhibit 1, and excluding all opt-outs listed on 

the Opt-Out List attached as Exhibit 2; 

4. Having heard from all parties interested at hearing, including class members, the 

Case 1:08-cv-00261-PB Document 181 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 2
Final Order Page 2 of3 

Proposed Settlement and its allocation of payments is determined to be fair, reasonable, 

and adequate, and is therefore approved; 

5. The terms of the Proposed Settlement are afforded final and complete effect; 

6. Settlement administration shall be conducted by Class Counsel. MetaBank and Meta 

Financial Group, Inc. will have no involvement with, and no liability for, settlement 

administration, the distribution determinations, nor the amount of any Settlement Check, 

including but not limited to any erroneous, improper or inaccurate calculations in 

connection with the distribution of individual Settlement Checks. 

7. All Class Members, and any person actually or purportedly acting on behalf of Class 

Members, are permanently barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, 

continuing, pursuing, maintaining, prosecuting or enforcing any Released Rights, directly 

or indirectly, in any judicial, administrative, arbitral, or other forum, against any ofthe 

Released Persons; 

8. Final judgment of dismissal on the merits and with prejudice is hereby entered on all 

claims in this matter; and 

9. Class Counsel's request for attorney's fees from the Settlement Fund is determined to be 

fair and reasonable, and is accordingly approved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (h) and 

54(d)(2). 

SOORD~j:_ 

Dated: At""' IDa ~~'")._~-~-U-~--~----- Barbadoro, D.J. 

Case 1:08-cv-00261-PB Document 181 Filed 04/10/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DRE'SHAUN E. BURNS,

Defendant.

8:23CR120

ORDER

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska.

IT IS ORDERED:

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the Federal 

Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith 

file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public Defender should 

decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of the Criminal Justice Act 

Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a draft 

appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other identifying information of 

the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for 

this district.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska.

DATED this 25th day of May, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00120-RFR-MDN Doc # 8 Filed: 05/25/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-35-PB

Adriano Mejia

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

January 8, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize the negotiated plea agreement. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 8, 2008 to April 1, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The December 19, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to March 28 2008 at 3:00 p.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00035-PB Document 15 Filed 12/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 17, 2007

cc: Jonathan R. Saxe, Esq.

Robert Kinsella, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00035-PB Document 15 Filed 12/17/07 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-4 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Robert H. Daskal,  Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.




                                                /s/ Robert H. Daskal
                                                --------------------
                                                Robert H. Daskal
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                                February 23, 2004

                                       22