alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: April 09, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Resource Management Company

v. Civil No. 06-cv-366-JD

Frank Gregory

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated February 27, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

March 23, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Benjamin Riggs, pro se

Frank Gregory, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 48 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00748-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.V., et al., Children

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-PA-02364

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

In this accelerated appeal of the termination of appellant’s parental rights, no docketing 

statement has been filed. The clerk’s record shows that attorney Kristy L. Arellano filed a 

motion for new trial with the trial court, and she verbally represented to this court that she is 

appellant’s counsel in this appeal. However, Arellano has not filed a notice of appearance or a 

docketing statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1 (requiring docketing statement); 4TH TEX. APP.

(SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 5.1, 5.2 (same).

On December 6, 2011, we ordered attorney Kristy L. Arellano to file a docketing 

statement with this court not later than December 16, 2011. We warned Arellano that failure to 

comply with this order could result in this appeal being dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) 
04-11-00748-CV

- 2 -

(allowing involuntary dismissal for failure to comply with a court order). After not receiving any 

response from Arellano, we ordered her to show cause in writing not later than January 6, 2012, 

why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. We again warned Arellano that 

if she failed to show cause in writing within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c); Kahanek v. Gross, No. 04-05-00106-CV, 2005 WL 1277745, at 

*1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 1, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing an appeal for failure 

to comply with a court order). 

To date, this court has not received a docketing statement, a notice of appearance, or any 

other filing from Arellano. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). 

PER CURIAM
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
__________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2          Q3           Q4           Total
__________________________________________________________________________________

1981......    |             1           0           0             0              1
1982......    |             2           3           3             3             11
1983......    |             1           1           2             3              7
1984......    |             3           7          10            12             32
1985......    |            12          21          17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14          21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19          12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6          12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7           5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5           6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2           3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1           1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2           2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2           0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0           0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0           1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0           0          n.a.           n.a.
__________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
                                  Estimated volume                 Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                                (percent)
                      ________________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1       Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
1996......    |           7       0        1        2        4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1        0        3       14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1        3        0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0        3        5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12        3        8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10        9        5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8        6        5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4        6        8       14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |          18       1        5        2       10      .044      .003      .012     .005     .021
2005......    |          17       2       11        4        0      .039      .005      .024     .009     .000
2006......    |          20       2        6        1       12      .042      .003      .012     .002     .023
2007......    |        n.a.      -3     n.a.     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.     -.006      n.a.     n.a.     n.a.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

)

THE FREEDOM FROM RELIGION

FOUNDATION, et al.,

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 07-356 (SM)

)

THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

)

)

)

Defendants. )

)

NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM

 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(1), Defendants the United States of America and the United

States Congress (collectively “Federal Defendants”) hereby give notice to the Court and opposing

counsel of their intention to file a reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss. The

Federal Defendants’ reply memorandum will be filed no later than March 11, 2008, pursuant to the

Court’s order approving the parties’ agreed-upon briefing schedule. See Order of Dec. 26, 2007.

Dated: February 21, 2008 Respectfully submitted,

JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ

Acting Assistant Attorney General

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

CARL J. NICHOLS

Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 37 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 3
2

THEODORE C. HIRT

Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch

 /s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer 

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, Cal. Bar No. 237526

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3338

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov

Counsel for the United States of America and the

United States Congress

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 37 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on February 21, 2008, the foregoing document was filed with the Clerk

of Court via the CM/ECF system, causing it to be served on Michael A. Newdow and Rosanna T.

Fox, counsel for the Plaintiffs; David H. Bradley, counsel for the School District Defendants; Nancy

Smith, counsel for intervenor-defendant the State of New Hampshire; and Eric C. Rassbach, Kevin

J. Hasson, and Bradford T. Atwood, counsel for intervenor-defendants Muriel Cyrus, et al.

 /s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer 

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 37 Filed 02/21/08 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
 
[LOGO OF HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL APPEARS HERE]


September 26, 1997


Mr. Howard Widra
3003 Van Ness Street, N.W.
Apt. 1019W
Washington, DC 20008



Dear Howard:


In connection with the granting of 25,000 options with an exercise price of 
$28.25 on September 24, 1997 (the "Options"), Healthcare Financial Partners 
("HCFP") hereby agrees with you as follows:


     If on the date that you exercise all or any portion of the Options the
     closing price of HCFP Common Stock is greater than $24.00 per share. HCFP
     will pay you, in cash, an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the difference
     between the closing price of HCFP Common Stock on the date of exercise and
     $24.00, or (b) $4.25, which amount shall be multiplied by the number of
     Options exercised on that date.


The provision described above applies to all or any part of the Options without 
regard to any prior exercise of the foregoing provision.

Notwithstanding anything in this agreement to the contrary, this agreement 
should be interpreted so that the economic effect of the Options, when combined
with the foregoing provision, is that the Options were granted at an exercise 
price of $24.00 per share as opposed to $28.25 per share.


This letter agreement shall be binding on HCFP, its successors and assigns.


Very truly yours,

HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.


By:  /s/ Edward P. Nordberg, Jr.
   -------------------------------
   Edward P. Nordberg, Jr.
   Executive Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130972 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

YUKO PHILIPPS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130972 

 COA: 266740 

WCAC: 04-000138 

CASCADE ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1782 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1782

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to provide for the position of Assistant 
         United States Trade Representative for Small Business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2001

 Mr. Manzullo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to provide for the position of Assistant 
         United States Trade Representative for Small Business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Export Enhancement 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANT USTR FOR SMALL BUSINESS.

    (a) Establishment of Position.--Section 141(c) of the Trade Act of 
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
    ``(6)(A) There is established in the Office the position of 
Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small Business. The 
Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small Business shall 
be appointed by the United States Trade Representative.
    ``(B) The primary function of the Assistant United States Trade 
Representative for Small Business shall be to promote the trade 
interests of small businesses, to remove foreign trade barriers that 
impede small business exporters, and to enforce existing trade 
agreements beneficial to small businesses. The Assistant United States 
Trade Representative for Small Business shall be a vigorous advocate on 
behalf of small businesses. In carrying out that advocacy function, the 
Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small Business shall 
conduct meetings throughout the United States on a regular basis in 
order to solicit views and recommendations from small business 
exporters in the formulation of trade policy. The Assistant United 
States Trade Representative for Small Business shall perform such other 
functions as the United States Trade Representative may direct.
    ``(C) The Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small 
Business shall be paid at the level of a member of the Senior Executive 
Service with equivalent time and service.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22619]



[[Page 55833]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13101-000]


Barrington Hydro LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

September 19, 2008.
    On January 23, 2008, Barrington Hydro LLC filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Barrington Hydroelectric Project to be located 
in Berkshire County, Massachusetts.
    The proposed project consists of: (1) An existing 22-foot high 130-
foot-long concrete and timber crib dam; (2) a proposed reservoir having 
a normal maximum water surface elevation of 716 feet (ngvd) and a 
surface area of 40 acres, with negligible storage capacity; (3) an 
existing 190-foot-long, 14-foot diameter concrete penstock; (4) a 
proposed powerhouse with two generating units having a total capacity 
of 1,100 KW; (5) a proposed 450-foot-long, 24-KV transmission line; and 
(6) appurtenant facilities. The project would have an annual generation 
of 4,300 MWh, and would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Robert Munch, Barrington Hydro LLC, P.O. Box 
1854 Lenox, MA 01240, Phone: 323-481-4460. FERC Contact: Henry Woo, 
202-502-8872.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``eFiling'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13101) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22619 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 08-cr-12-01-PB

Jayda Ramirez

The defendant has moved to continue the July 8, 2008 trial in the above case. Defendant

cites the need for additional time for the parties to complete their efforts to negotiate a non-trial

disposition or otherwise prepare for the trial or other disposition of the case. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time to complete their efforts to

negotiate a non-trial disposition or otherwise prepare for trial or other disposition of the case, the

court will continue the trial from July 8, 2008 to August 19, 2008. In agreeing to continue the trial,

the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends

of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00012-PB Document 13 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The final pretrial conference is continued until July 31, 2008 at 3:45 PM.

SO ORDERED.

June 30, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Clyde Garrigan, Esq.

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

U. S. Probation

U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00012-PB Document 13 Filed 06/30/08 Page 2 of 2
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




March 16, 2004




Mr. Christopher S. Alexander

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

HYPERCOM CORPORATION

2851 W. Kathleen Road

Phoenix, Arizona 85053



Re:        Deferred Compensation Agreement Dated June 3, 2002




Dear Chris:




     This letter confirms that effective January 1, 2004 (the “Effective
Date”), the Deferred Compensation Agreement between you and Hypercom dated June
3, 2002 (the “Agreement”) is amended to provide that the total deferred
compensation and accrued interest thereon under the terms of the Agreement as
of the Effective Date, and all compensation which you may defer thereafter
pursuant to the Agreement, shall accrue interest at 4% per annum, compounded
bi-weekly. Such interest rate shall be adjusted to the interest rate under
Hypercom’s Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Facility effective
December 31, 2003 (the “Credit Facility”), as amended or superceded from time
to time, and such new interest rate under the Agreement shall be effective on
the same date as a new interest rate shall be effective under the Credit
Facility or a superceding agreement. All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement are unchanged and remain in full force and effect.



     Please signify your confirmation of the foregoing by signing below.



	 	 	 
	

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	

	 	/s/
John W. Smolak

	

	 	John W. Smolak, Executive Vice President
	

	 	and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer







Acknowledged and Agreed:




/s/ C.S. Alexander





Christopher S. Alexander