alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Paul LOPEZ, Appellant, v. John B. ABALOS, Appellee.

No. 4566.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland.

July 28, 1972.

*614Nunn, Griggs, Beall & Wilks, James L. Wilks, Sweetwater, for appellant.

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by writ of error from a default judgment.

John B. Abalos sued Paul Lopez and Rosalia L. Martinez for property damages resulting from an automobile collision. Both defendants were served with citation but neither answered. The trial court entered a default judgment in favor of Aba-los against Lopez and Martinez. Paul Lopez perfected this appeal by writ of error. John B. Abalos neither filed a brief nor made an appearance of any kind to contest the appeal. We reverse and remand.

Appellant, Lopez, contends that as to him, the allegations contained in plaintiff’s original petition will not support a default judgment. We agree.

The petition for writ of error is directed solely at the pleadings of Abalos and the judgment of the court. The petition alleges that on May 29, 1970, an automobile collision occurred between a vehicle owned and operated by Abalos and a vehicle owned by appellant, Lopez, but operated by Martinez. The petition contains several alleged specific negligent acts by Martinez. There is no allegation, general or specific, of negligent conduct by Lopez. The petition alleges only “that at the time of the accident in question, the Defendant, Rosa-lia L. Martinez, was operating the vehicle owned by the Defendant, Paul Lopez, with his express permission and consent and under such circumstances as to make her the agent of Paul Lopez.”

Rules 45 and 47, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, require that pleadings give fair notice of the claim involved. Rule 90, T.R.C.P., which provides for waiver of defects not specifically pointed out, does not apply to a party against whom a default judgment has been rendered.

It has been frequently held that a petition containing only a general allegation of negligence does not satisfy the requirements of Rules 45 and 47, and will not support a default judgment. White v. Jackson, 358 S.W.2d 174, (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1962, writ ref. n. r. e.); Stinson v. Jones, 434 S.W.2d 212, (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1968, no writ); White Motor Company v. Loden, 373 S.W.2d 863, (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1963, no writ).

The court in White v. Jackson, supra, said:

> “The Rule is that in order to be sufficient to support a default judgment, a plaintiff’s petition must at least set forth sufficient of the facts and circumstances which constitute his cause of action as to *615fairly notify his adversary of the basis of his claim and of the relief which he is seeking.”

Here we have only the bare assertion that Martinez was operating a vehicle “under such circumstances as to make her the agent of Paul Lopez”. We think that fair notice was not given to Lopez of the facts and circumstances relied upon by Abalos to create the agency relationship. See C & H Transportation Company v. Wright, 396 S.W.2d 443, (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1965, writ ref. n. r. e.).

The default judgment rendered against Paul Lopez is reversed and the cause remanded for trial.
*Release Date: September 30, 2004*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 7.2     | 7.2                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.5     | 6.4                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.3     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.2     | 6.1                    | 5.7                                |
| 6.1     | 6.1                    | 5.7                                |
| 6.3     | 6.3                    | 5.8                                |
| 6.4     | 6.3                    | 6.0                                |
||
| 7.7     | 7.6                    | 7.1                                |
| 7.5     | 7.4                    | 6.9                                |
| 7.2     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.0     | 6.9                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.9     | 6.8                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
| 34.6    | 6.6                    | 6.1                                |
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 5.8     | 6.0                    | 6.2                                |
| 5.2     | 5.3                    | 5.2                                |
| 5.1     | 5.3                    | 5.6                                |
| 4.6     | 4.9                    | 5.7                                |
| 5.8     | 6.2                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.0     | 6.2                    | 6.7                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement No. 333-229744 on Form F-10 of Emerald Health Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and to the use of our reportsdated April 30, 2019 relating to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the Company’s going concern), and March29, 2018 relating to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 of the Company appearingin this Annual Report on Form 40-F.

 

 

*/s/ Deloitte LLP*

 

Chartered Professional Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

April 30, 2019
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 10(f)

<PAGE>   2

                                AMENDMENT TO
                        CONNECTION CARRIER AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment"), dated as of August 1, 1994, between
DELTA AIR LINES, INC., having its principal place of business located at
Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001
("Delta"), and ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC., having its principal place of
business located at 100 Hartsfield Center, Suite 800, Atlanta, Georgia
30354-1356 ("ASA").


                               W I T N E S E T H:


         WHEREAS, Delta and ASA are parties to a certain Delta Connection
Agreement, dated and effective July 1, 1986, as amended by amendments dated
February 19, 1987, December 17, 1987, July 1, 1988 and March 4, 1992 (the Delta
Connection Agreement, as so amended, is hereafter referred to as the
"Agreement"); and

   
         WHEREAS, the Agreement will expire by its terms on August 9, 1994; and
    

         WHEREAS, Delta and ASA desire to extend the term of the Agreement as
provided herein;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby
amend the Agreement as follows:

   
         1.      Extension of Term. The fixed term of the Agreement is hereby
extended until December 31, 1994.  Thereafter, the Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect until terminated by either party on thirty (30) days'
advance written notice to the other party or earlier terminated in accordance
with the provisions of Article 7.
    

         2.      No Further Amendment.  Except as amended hereby, the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

         3.      Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia.


<PAGE>   3
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year
first above written.


                                   DELTA AIR LINES, INC.



                                   By: /s/ Robert W. Coggin
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Robert W. Coggin
                                       Senior Vice President-Marketing



                                   ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC.



                                   By: /s/ John Beiser
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       John Beiser
                                       President

                                       2
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.19


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of United
Diagnostic, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, J.
Marvin Feigenbaum, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of United
Diagnostic, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report; and

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.


Dated:  February 4, 2003             By:  /s/ J. Marvin Feigenbaum
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          J. Marvin Feigenbaum
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



         This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





                                       33
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Claudio Nunez, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 870]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Caesar D. Cirigliano, J.), rendered May 11, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. The court’s response during the plea allocution to a question from defendant about deportation consequences was not inconsistent with the pertinent provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 USC § 1226 [c]; § 1227 [a] [2] [A] [iii]). Similarly, counsel was not ineffective for failing to address the *377court’s purported misstatement *(compare People v McDonald,*1 NY3d 109 [2003]).

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of the court’s suppression ruling. Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we would reject his suppression argument. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

HOP KEE PYROTECHNICS, Ltd., ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CV-1:06-cv-0393-JD 

 ) 

PYRAMID FIREWORKS, INC. ) 

And GARRY DEBLASIS, Individually, ) 

 Defendants. ) 

ORDER TO APPEAR

Come now Plaintiff, Hop Kee Pyrotechnics, Ltd., by counsel, and files its Motion for 

Periodic Payment on Judgment. The Court having examined said Motion, now finds that 

Defendants Pyramid Fireworks, Inc. and Garry DeBlasis should be ordered to appear and 

answer as to their assets. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants Pyramid Fireworks, Inc. and Garry 

DeBlasis, appear before this Court in person on the _______ day of ____________________, 2008 

at ________ ._____m. and answer as to their assets. 

DATED this ____ day of _______________________________, 2008. 

 __________________________________________ 

 

26th June 10:15 a. 5th June

Magistrate Judge 

District Court of New Hampshire /s/ James R. Muirhead

Case 1:06-cv-00393-JD Document 38 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 2
Distribution To: 

Dennis Pizzimenti 

Attorney at Law 

6 Chapel Street 

Concord, New Hampshire 03301 

John H. Brooke 

BROOKE MAWHORR, P. C. 

P.O. Box 1071 

112 E. Gilbert St. 

Muncie, IN 47305 

Pyramid Fireworks, Inc. 

124 Route 125 

Kingston, New Hampshire 03848 

Garry DeBlasis 

124 Route 125 

Kingston, New Hampshire 03848 

Case 1:06-cv-00393-JD Document 38 Filed 06/05/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This document contains summary financial information extracted from the attached
quarterly  report  on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  June  30,  1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,927
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  56,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,315
<INVENTORY>                                    75,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,082
<PP&E>                                         39,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          84,632
<BONDS>                                        131,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       143
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,459
<SALES>                                        323,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               323,607
<CGS>                                          247,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                32,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                   13,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            19,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                545
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.30

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2008,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 7, 2008
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1992...... 44 7 11 16 10 .232 .038 .058 .079 .049

1993...... 24 2 4 7 11 .121 .010 .018 .035 .054

1994...... 10 1 1 3 6 .048 .003 .003 .013 .026

1995...... 12 0 3 6 4 .055 -.001 .011 .027 .016

1996...... 7 0 1 2 4 .031 .000 .003 .009 .017

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... n.a. 4 6 8 n.a. n.a. .010 .015 .021 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
|                                                       |   |                        |   | Percentage                   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                       |   |                        |   | of                    Voting |   |
|                                                       |   |                        |   | Securities                   |   |
|                                                       |   | State                    of |   | Owned                    By  |   |
|                                                       |   | Incorporation               |   | Registrant                   |   |
| Compupower                    Corporation                  |   | Delaware                    |   |                         | 100    | % |
|                                                       |   |                        |   |                         |   |   |
| Value                    Line Securities, Inc.             |   | New                  York   |   |                         | 100    | % |
|                                                       |   |                             |   |                         |   |   |
| The                    Vanderbilt Advertising Agency, Inc. |   | New                  York   |   |                         | 100    | % |
|                                                       |   |                        |   |                         |   |   |
| Value                    Line Publishing, Inc.             |   | New                  York   |   |                         | 100    | % |
|                                                       |   |                        |   |                         |   |   |
| Value                    Line Distribution Center, Inc.    |   | New                  Jersey |   |                         | 100    | % |

----
*Release Date: December 31, 2006*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 12   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 6 | 4 | .055 | -.001 | .011 | .027 | .016 |
| 7    | 0                                      | 1                                                     | 2 | 4 | .031 | .000 | .003 | .009 | .017 |
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| n.a. | 2                                      | 6                                                     | 1 | n.a. | n.a. | .003 | .012 | .002 | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us