alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1752 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1752

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the at-risk rules 
                 for publicly traded nonrecourse debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

  Mr. Foley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the at-risk rules 
                 for publicly traded nonrecourse debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT UNDER AT-RISK RULES OF PUBLICLY TRADED NONRECOURSE 
              DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 465(b)(6) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified nonrecourse 
financing treated as amount at risk) is amended by striking ``share 
of'' and all that follows and inserting ``share of--
                            ``(i) any qualified nonrecourse financing 
                        which is secured by real property used in such 
                        activity, and
                            ``(ii) any other financing which--
                                    ``(I) would (but for subparagraph 
                                (B)(ii)) be qualified nonrecourse 
                                financing,
                                    ``(II) is qualified publicly traded 
                                debt, and
                                    ``(III) is not borrowed by the 
                                taxpayer from a person described in 
                                subclause (I), (II), or (III) of 
                                section 49(a)(1)(D)(iv).''.
    (b) Qualified Publicly Traded Debt.--Paragraph (6) of section 
465(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Qualified publicly traded debt.--For purposes 
                of subparagraph (A), the term `qualified publicly 
                traded debt' means any debt instrument which is readily 
                tradable on an established securities market. Such term 
                shall not include any debt instrument which has a yield 
                to maturity which equals or exceeds the limitation in 
                section 163(i)(1)(B).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to debt instruments issued after December 31, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1992...... 8.9 6.1 9.5 8.6 20.1 9.4 8.3 9.7 11.1 7.2 1993...... 9.2 7.3 9.6 8.3 30.4 9.4 8.5 10.0 11.1 7.4 1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2000: Q3... 11.1 6.7 14.8 9.1 30.7 10.2 9.0 11.2 10.2 11.9  Q4... 10.6 7.2 9.7 7.9 25.8 14.5 8.9 10.5 11.5 10.5 2001: Q1... 18.7 8.7 18.6 12.4 30.6 25.9 9.9 13.3 13.5 23.0  Q2... 11.8 8.1 16.9 10.2 14.0 12.8 11.1 11.9 12.5 11.6  Q3... 11.0 6.8 10.7 8.6 32.3 11.3 9.1 11.2 11.8 10.9  Q4... 10.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 31.4 9.9 7.6 11.1 12.1 10.3 2002: Q1... 11.7 9.3 9.7 10.9 29.8 10.8 10.0 12.4 14.6 10.3  Q2... 13.4 11.3 19.6 10.6 27.7 16.8 10.2 12.6 14.2 13.8  Q3... 9.9 6.3 8.0 9.8 12.7 10.6 9.4 9.4 10.6 9.7  Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3  Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1884 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1884

                      To honor Paul D. Coverdell.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2001

   Mr. Linder (for himself, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Barr of 
 Georgia, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Collins, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Lewis of 
Georgia, Mr. Isakson, and Ms. McKinney) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To honor Paul D. Coverdell.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAUL D. COVERDELL BUILDING.

    (a) Award.--From the amount appropriated under subsection (b) the 
Secretary of Education shall make an award to the University of Georgia 
to support the construction of the Paul D. Coverdell Building at the 
Institute of the Biomedical and Health Sciences at the University of 
Georgia.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal year 
2002.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                              |                                          |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                         |                                     |
|         |                                                              | /s/              Mark              Goldwasser |
|         | Mark              Goldwasser                                      |
|         | Chief                Executive OfficerMay                10, 2007 |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of M Power Entertainment, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (FKA GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary F. Kimmons,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of the
         operation of the Company.


/s/ Gary F. Kimmons
_____________________________________
Gary F. Kimmons
Chief Financial Officer
June 21, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2



CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Kevin T. Michaels, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 4, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS                                     
|                     |  |     |  | Kevin T. Michaels                                         
|                     |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
#### Mrs. Margaret B. HILL v. COMMERCIAL STANDARD INS. CO. et al.

No. 2524.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

May 27, 1943.

Lewis & Lewis, of Opelousas, for appellant.

Durrett & Hardin, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion in the consolidated cases of Ernest Emil Miller, Mrs. Ethel H. Miller and Mrs. Margaret B. Hill v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. et al. La.App., 13 So.2d 733, this day handed down, it is ordered that the judgment in the case of Mrs. Margaret B. Hill v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. et al. be amended by reducing the amount of the award from the sum of $2,562.31 to the sum of $2,178.31, and as thus amended the judgment is hereby affirmed; plaintiff to pay the cost of the appeal, and the defendants to pay all other costs.
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1761

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 8588 Richmond Highway in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herb Harris Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1761 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 8588 Richmond Highway in Alexandria, Virginia,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Herb Harris Post

5 Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Herb Harris Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 10,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Donald Spinner

v. Civil No. 08-cv-67-JL

Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Donald Spinner filed his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus (document no. 1) on February 25, 2008. On March 24, 2008,

Spinner was ordered to amend his petition to demonstrate that the

five claims raised therein had been exhausted in the state courts

(document no. 6). On March 31, 2008, Spinner filed a response

(document no. 7) which demonstrated that four of Spinner’s five

claims had been exhausted. On October 23, 2008, in response to

further orders of the Court, Spinner opted to forego his

unexhausted claim so that his exhausted claims might proceed

promptly (document no. 13). I now direct that the exhausted

claims, numbered 1, 2, 3 & 5 in my March 24, 2008 Order, be

served upon respondent. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (“§ 2254

Rules”).

Case 1:08-cv-00067-JL Document 15 Filed 11/19/08 Page 1 of 3
2

The petition shall be served upon respondent, which shall

file an answer or other pleading in response to the allegations

made therein. See id. (requiring reviewing judge to order a

response to the petition). The Clerk’s office is directed to

serve the New Hampshire Office of the Attorney General, as

provided in the Agreement On Acceptance Of Service, copies of

this Court’s previous Orders in this matter (document nos. 6, 8,

11 & 13), the habeas petition and amendments thereto (document

nos. 1, 7, 10, 12 & 14), and this Order. 

Respondent shall answer or otherwise plead within thirty

(30) days of the date of this Order. The answer shall comply

with the requirements of § 2254 Rule 5 (setting forth contents of

the answer). 

Upon receipt of the response, the Court will determine

whether a hearing is warranted. See § 2254 Rule 8 (providing

circumstances under which a hearing is appropriate). 

Petitioner is referred to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, which requires

that every pleading, written motion, notice, and similar paper, 

Case 1:08-cv-00067-JL Document 15 Filed 11/19/08 Page 2 of 3
3

after the petition, shall be served on all parties. Such service

is to be made by mailing the material to the parties’ attorneys. 

SO ORDERED. 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 19, 2008

cc: Donald Spinner, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00067-JL Document 15 Filed 11/19/08 Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2014

s0121 

# Order

Clerk January 24, 2014

146872

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146872

COA: 308275

Wayne CC: 03

- 011966

- FH

THOMAS CLIFFORD WHITE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On January 15, 2014, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to

appeal the January 24, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court,

the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to

ap peal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the

Wayne Circuit Court’s January 11, 2012 orders. Under the unique circumstances of this

case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion, see People v Bylsma , 493 Mich 17, 26

(2012), and People v Brown , 492 Mich 684, 688 (2012), when it set aside the defendant’s

guilty plea, dismissed the case with prejudice, and vacated the defendant’s sentence.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1870

To provide for the sale of certain real property within the Newlands Project

in Nevada, to the city of Fallon, Nevada.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2001

Mr. GIBBONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To provide for the sale of certain real property within the

Newlands Project in Nevada, to the city of Fallon, Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

5 Loading Facility Transfer Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF FALLON, NEVADA.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—

8 (1) CONVEYANCE.—Subject only to the provi9 sions of subsection (b), the Secretary of the Interior

10 shall convey to the city of Fallon, Nevada, all right,
2

•HR 1870 IH

1 title, and interest of the United States in and to ap2 proximately 6.3 acres of real property within the

3 Newlands Project, Nevada, generally known as 380

4 North Taylor Street, Fallon, Nevada, and identified

5 for disposition on the map entitled ‘‘Fallon Rail

6 Freight Loading Facility’’.

7 (2) MAP.—The Secretary shall keep the map

8 referred to in paragraph (1) on file and available for

9 public inspection in the offices of the Commissioner

10 of the Bureau of Reclamation and the offices of the

11 Area Manager of the Bureau of Reclamation, Carson

12 City, Nevada.

13 (b) CONSIDERATION.—The Secretary shall require

14 that as consideration for the conveyance under subsection

15 (a), the city of Fallon shall pay the United States an

16 amount equal to the fair market value of the real property

17 as determined by an appraisal of the fair market value

18 of the real property, without taking into consideration the

19 value of any structures or improvements on the property,

20 as of a date that is not later than 60 days after the date

21 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

2007...... 0 0 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.74



                   [PREFERRED EQUITIES CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]



                                January 20, 1998



Mego Mortgage Corporation
1000 Parkwood Circle, 5th Floor
Atlanta, GA 30339

Attention: James L. Belter, Executive Vice President

Re:   Loan Program Sub-Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 1996 between
      Preferred Equities Corporation ("PEC") and Mego Mortgage Corporation
      ("MMC") as amended by Letter Agreement dated September 2, 1997 (and as
      amended, the "Agreement")

Gentlemen:

This letter serves to confirm our agreement that the monthly servicing fee of
one-twelfth (1/12) of four tenths (4/10) of one percent (0.40%) of the
outstanding principal balance of all loans being serviced on the first day of
the prior month as set forth in Article 4 of the Agreement is hereby modified
and amended to be one-twelfth (1/1 2) of thirty-five one hundredths (35/100) of
one percent (0.35%) commencing for the month of January 1998. Except as modified
hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

Please sign a copy of this letter in the space indicated below to indicate your
acceptance and approval of the foregoing.

                             Very truly yours,

                             PREFERRED EQUITIES CORPORATION

                             By: /s/ FREDERICK H. CONTE
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Frederick H. Conte, Executive Vice President

Accepted and approved as of this 20th day of January, 1998.

MEGO MORTGAGE CORPORATION

By: /s/ JAMES L. BELTER
    -------------------------------------------
    Jame L. Belter, Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT
32.1






SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Gary F
Kimmons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
eDOORWAYS Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.






/S/ Gary
F Kimmons






-------------------------------






Gary F
Kimmons


Chief
Executive and Principal Accounting Officer


February
9, 2009






This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 06-cr-49-01-SM

Wanderlei Martins-Campos

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 18) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2006 trial period. Defendant has filed a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:06-cr-00049-SM Document 20 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: September 25, 2006 at 2:30 PM

Jury Selection: October 3, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

July 26, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

 Michael Shklar, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00049-SM Document 20 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2