alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LARSCOM INCORPORATED FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,699
<SECURITIES>                                    20,203
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                       649
<INVENTORY>                                      5,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,419
<PP&E>                                          19,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,565
<SALES>                                         38,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,709
<CGS>                                           19,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (978)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,749)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,749)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-106-PB

Haibaran Resaul

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 6, 2008 trial in the above case, citing a scheduling conflict

and the need for additional time to prepare for trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 6, 2008 to June 3, 2008. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 28, 2008

cc: Camille Russell, Esq.

Sandra Bloomenthal, Esq.

Case 1:07-cr-00106-PB Document 26 Filed 04/28/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00106-PB Document 26 Filed 04/28/08 Page 2 of 2
#### EVANS PRODUCTS COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 7318.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 11, 1938.

Prewitt Semmes, of Detroit, Mich., and Nichols, Morrill, Wood, Marx & Ginter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.

John J. Burns, of New York City, and Thomas J. Lynch, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be, and the same is, dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-047-01-JD

Stephen M. Butler 

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

34) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: September 13, 2007

cc: Harry C. Batchelder, Jr., Esq.

Mark S. Zuckerman, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00047-JD Document 35 Filed 09/13/07 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22130]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time:  Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 10 a.m.-1 p.m.

Place:  U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

Agenda:  Commissioners will consider and vote on Draft EAC Guidance to 
States Regarding Material Changes to State Plans. Commissioners will 
consider and vote on the accreditation of CIBER, Inc. Commissioners 
will consider a Draft Working Group Policy [formally known as Draft 
Policy for Joint Partnership Task Force of EAC and State Election 
Officials Regarding Spending of HAVA Funds]. Commissioners will discuss 
revisions to the advisory opinion process. The Commission will consider 
other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

Person to Contact for Information:  Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Election Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-22130 Filed 9-17-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
#### F. E. LACAZE, Defendant In Injunction, Appellant, v. Rufus ATKINS, Plaintiff In Injunction, Appellee. Rufus ATKINS et al., Plalntiffs-Appellees, v. F. E. LACAZE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4908.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1935.

Hunter & Hunter, of Shreveport, for appellants.

Herold, Counsin & Herold, Wilkinson, Lewis & Wilkinson, Edward S. Klein, and Ed*877ward Barnett, all of Shreveport, for appel-lees.

DREW, Judge.

These two cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial below with the case of M. S. and Lula Davis et al. v. E. E. Lacaze, which case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the state and bears No. 329111 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana. 158 So. 626.

The three cases involve a similar state of facts, and it is agreed by counsel for both appellant and appellee that the decis'on of the Supreme Court in the above-numbered and styled ease, in which the judgment of the lower court was affirmed, is conclusive of the issues in the cases at bar.

Therefore, for the reasons given in the case of M. S. and Lula Davis et al. v. E. E. Lacaze, No. 32911 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana, decided January 7, 1935, the decisions of the lower court in these two cases are affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         362,368
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  55,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               417,543
<PP&E>                                         866,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (96,082)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,188,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          282,939
<BONDS>                                        30,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,180,083
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,312,410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,188,300
<SALES>                                        7,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,999
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (359,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (359,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (359,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital et al.

v. Case No. 07-cv-194-PB

NH Department of Health and Human Services

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated June 27, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

August 2, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Christopher Carter, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00194-PB Document 13 Filed 08/02/07 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-20109.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 18, 2003.

*302Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Jose Ruiz appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. Ruiz’s notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence was untimely. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(b); *United States v. Alvarez,*210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir.2000). His motion for reconsideration did not toll the running of the ten-day time for filing an effective notice of appeal, because it also was untimely filed. *See United States v. Brewer,*60 F.3d 1142, 1145 (5th Cir.1995).

Ruiz’s notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for reconsideration was timely. The district court was without jurisdiction, however, to entertain an untimely motion for reconsideration. *See United States v. Miramontez,*995 F.2d 56, 58 n. 2 (5th Cir.1993); *United States v. Cook,*670 F.2d 46, 48 (5th Cir.1982). Ruiz thus has appealed the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion. *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 182 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 182

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 
 Eight Mile River in the State of Connecticut for study for potential 
 addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Simmons (for himself, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Shays, Mr. 
  Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, and Ms. DeLauro) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 
 Eight Mile River in the State of Connecticut for study for potential 
 addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eight Mile River Wild and Scenic 
River Study Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the Eight Mile River in the State of Connecticut 
        possesses important resource values, including wildlife, 
        ecological, and scenic values, and historic sites and a 
        cultural past important to America's heritage;
            (2) there is strong support among State and local 
        officials, area residents, and river users for a cooperative 
        wild and scenic river study of the area; and
            (3) there is a longstanding interest among State and local 
        officials, area residents, and river users in undertaking a 
        concerted cooperative effort to manage the river in a 
        productive and meaningful way.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

    Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(138) Eight Mile River, Connecticut.--The segment from its 
headwaters downstream to its confluence with the Connecticut River.''.
    ``(18) The study of the Eight Mile River, Connecticut, named in 
paragraph (138) of subsection (a) shall be completed by the Secretary 
of the Interior and the report thereon submitted to Congress not later 
than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this paragraph.''.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary F. Kimmons, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: May 5, 2003                      /S/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        By: Gary F. Kimmons
                                        Its: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kelley Nault

v. Civil No. 07-cv-387-PB

Concord Housing Authority

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: December 4, 2007

cc: Stephanie Anne Bray, Esq.

 Michael G. Perez, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00387-JL Document 7 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark A. White, Also Known as Mark Benin, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 430]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Weinberg, J.), rendered March 3, 2004, convicting him of attempted criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court *(see People v Granton,*236 AD2d 624 [1997]; *People v McGriff,*216 AD2d 330 [1995]). In this case, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of SPO Medical Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jeffrey Feuer, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


April 11, 2006                                  /s/ Jeffery Feuer
                                                -----------------
                                                Jeffery Feuer
                                                Principal Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SPO MEDICAL INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SPO MEDICAL INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Milacron Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company) for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge
and belief, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                           
|
| | 2. the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company as of
    December 31, 2003.



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ RONALD D. BROWN

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Ronald D. Brown        
| | Chairman, President and
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 15, 2004



| |     |                       
| | --- | ----------------------
| | By: | /s/ ROBERT P. LIENESCH

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | Robert P. Lienesch         
| | Vice President  Finance   
| | and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certificate accompanies this Annual Report
on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certificate will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.

97
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward G. Caminos, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| */s/  Edward G. Caminos* |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Edward G. Caminos        |
| Chief Financial Officer  |
| May 11, 2009        |

 

----
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 446,787 152,724 88,110 102,022 25,347 5,390 10,045 Number of loans 12,479 2,743 3,092 3,487 520 116 737 Weighted average maturity (months)1 24.52 13.82 38.28 38.78 7.44 1.77 16.58 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 9.90 5.47 10.80 18.58 6.08 .76 14.56 

Weighted average risk rating3 2.04 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.73 7.00 6.86 6.65 7.43 6.31 6.45 

 Standard error5 .23 .42 .23 .16 .31 .26 .59  Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.50 7.50 7.17 7.12 7.82 6.17 7.34  25th percentile 6.15 6.62 6.09 6.16 7.36 6.17 6.09  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.49 5.82 6.36 6.60 7.86 n.a. 7.05  Other livestock 7.04 7.49 n.a. 7.23 n.a. n.a. n.a Other current operating expenses7 7.16 7.34 6.76 6.73 7.46 6.31 6.01 

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.90 6.79 7.94 6.66 n.a. n.a. 6.75  Farm real estate 6.34 2.01 6.31 6.38 5.38 n.a. 7.00  Other8 7.88 7.48 8.36 6.73 6.96 n.a. 6.95 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 49.77 55.67 55.42 39.14 23.33 88.25 15.97  Under commitment 64.78 82.76 40.35 59.99 47.57 100.00 25.14  Callable 16.15 9.89 11.47 4.90 8.10 n.a. 44.03  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 19.36 21.29 9.44 11.32 9.39 n.a. 4.68  Other livestock 10.27 .84 16.57 14.58 n.a. n.a. n.a Other current operating expenses7 49.30 74.52 37.58 30.22 87.41 100.00 53.18 

 Farm machinery and equipment 3.75 2.12 4.75 4.52 n.a. n.a. 3.89  Farm real estate 13.25 .14 18.72 38.61 2.78 n.a. 10.66  Other8 4.06 1.10 12.95 .75 .42 n.a. 27.60 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 18.50 3.74 27.43 39.47 40.87 5.79 10.24  Other 78.73 94.42 68.26 56.71 59.06 94.21 88.87  Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.