alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Amherst Country Club, Inc.

v. Civil No. 07-cv-136-JL

Harleysville Worcester

Insurance Co.

 O R D E R

Due to a court scheduling conflict, the motion hearing

currently scheduled in this case for Friday, May 30, 2008 at

10:00 a.m., shall be re-scheduled.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: May 28, 2008

cc: Timothy G. Kerrigan, Esq.

Andrew J. Piela, Esq.

Lawrence A. Dugan, Esq.

Ralph Suozzo, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00136-JL Document 19 Filed 05/28/08 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1720

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate cost-sharing

under the Medicare Program for bone mass measurements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate

cost-sharing under the Medicare Program for bone mass

measurements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improved Access to

5 Osteoporosis Testing Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF COST-SHARING FOR BONE MASS

7 MEASUREMENTS.

8 (a) ELIMINATION OF COINSURANCE.—
2

•HR 1720 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833(a)(1)(N) of

2 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)(N))

3 is amended—

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘other than bone mass

5 measurement described in section 1861(s)(15)’’

6 after ‘‘(as defined in section 1848(j)(3))’’; and

7 (B) by adding after the comma at the end

8 the following: ‘‘and in the case of such services

9 consisting of such a bone mass measurement,

10 the amounts paid shall be 100 percent of such

11 payment basis,’’.

12 (2) ELIMINATION OF COINSURANCE IN OUT13 PATIENT HOSPITAL SETTINGS.—The third sentence

14 of section 1866(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act

15 (42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(2)(A)) is amended by insert16 ing after ‘‘1861(s)(10)(A)’’ the following: ‘‘, with re17 spect to bone mass measurement (as defined in sec18 tion 1861(rr)),’’.

19 (b) WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE.—The first sentence of

20 section 1833(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

21 1395l(b)) is amended—

22 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘(6)’’; and

23 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the

24 following: ‘‘, and (7) such deductible shall not apply
3

•HR 1720 IH

1 with respect to bone mass measurement (as defined

2 in section 1861(rr))’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to items and services furnished on

5 or after January 1, 2002.

Æ
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1994...... 33.91 60.27 27.58 16.29 17.54 123.60 3.72 14.57 46.98 480.70 1995...... 33.77 49.68 26.74 18.46 15.59 93.60 3.73 14.72 44.94 451.25 1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2002: Q4... 31.46 52.06 38.39 22.16 17.78 67.64 3.85 15.19 46.02 333.67 2003: Q1... 35.98 68.86 32.35 27.73 38.74 62.19 3.72 14.88 46.71 249.54  Q2... 24.61 43.91 32.67 18.01 28.73 55.73 3.72 14.67 48.45 241.93  Q3... 27.75 78.05 40.90 17.84 37.37 65.70 3.53 14.83 46.45 319.67  Q4... 35.13 79.92 42.70 23.13 28.16 75.70 4.11 14.85 47.42 313.07 2004: Q1... 45.07 60.59 43.04 35.57 56.02 98.51 3.86 15.02 47.24 341.06  Q2... 32.01 47.74 36.25 21.95 26.77 116.76 3.73 15.17 45.83 358.08  Q3... 33.42 32.56 62.64 18.04 42.06 143.63 3.76 14.56 44.91 359.39  Q4... 49.42 108.90 70.44 30.21 75.92 90.23 3.96 14.46 46.63 385.43 2005: Q1... 40.23 52.36 44.37 36.66 35.31 54.11 3.57 14.72 49.15 290.01  Q2... 42.75 70.57 38.44 23.68 78.69 132.29 3.95 14.60 46.31 371.83  Q3... 38.87 65.13 67.97 22.19 73.29 105.64 3.84 14.39 46.29 397.07  Q4... 39.08 83.40 41.58 24.45 43.37 97.49 3.92 14.83 46.73 270.45 2006: Q1... 43.76 45.56 49.62 37.78 39.28 96.24 3.81 15.09 47.28 288.50  Q2... 51.32 51.29 50.51 32.34 123.28 132.75 5.39 14.82 45.54 364.91  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 22

### CFR Correction

In title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 22, revised as of Oct. 1, 2007, on page 78, in § 22.709, paragraph (b)(3) is reinstated to read as follows:

§ 22.709

* * * * *

(b)* * * 

* * * * *

(3) The center frequency of each channel requested, the maximum effective radiated power, the effective radiated power in each of the cardinal radial directions, any non-standard emission types to be used, including bandwidth and modulation type, the transmitter classification (e.g. central office), and the locations and call signs, if any, of any fixed points of communication.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. E8-22599 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Ramon Guerrero

v. Civil No. 06-cv-173-SM

New Hampshire Department

of Corrections, et al.

O R D E R

Before the Court is Ramon Guerrero’s complaint, filed

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and State tort law, alleging that

his constitutional rights were violated by New Hampshire

Department of Corrections (“DOC”) employees during his

incarceration at the New Hampshire State Prison (“NHSP”). The

complaint is before me for preliminary review to determine

whether, among other things, it states any claim upon which

relief might be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; United States

District Court for the District of New Hampshire Local Rule

(“LR”) 4.3(d)(2). For the reasons explained fully in my Report

and Recommendation issued this date, I direct that the claims

alleging failure to protect, inadequate medical care and the

claims raised under State law, be served against defendants

Christie, Conner, Freedman, Carroll, and Ash, and I recommend the

Case 1:06-cv-00173-JL Document 8 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 3
2

dismissal of the remainder of the claims and defendants from this

action.

As I find that plaintiff has stated claims for inadequate

medical care and failure to protect upon which relief may be

granted, I order the complaint (document no. 1) be served on

Defendants Freedman, Christie, Conner, Carroll, and Ash. The

Clerk’s office is directed to serve the New Hampshire Office of

the Attorney General (AG), as provided in the Agreement On

Acceptance Of Service, copies of this order, the Report and

Recommendation, and the complaint (document no. 1). See LR

4.3(d)(2)(C). Within thirty days from receipt of these

materials, the AG will submit to the court an Acceptance of

Service notice specifying those defendants who have authorized

the AG’s office to receive service on their behalf. When the

Acceptance of Service is filed, service will be deemed made on

the last day of the thirty-day period. 

As to those defendants who do not authorize the AG’s office

to receive service on their behalf or whom the AG declines to

represent, the AG shall, within thirty days from receipt of the

aforementioned materials, provide a separate list of the last

known addresses of such defendants. The Clerk’s office is

Case 1:06-cv-00173-JL Document 8 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 3
3

instructed to complete service on these individuals by sending to

them, by certified mail, return receipt requested, copies of

these same documents. 

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of acceptance of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(a)(1)(A).

 Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on 

the Defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorneys, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ James R. Muirhead

_______________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 10, 2007

cc: Ramon Guerrero, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00173-JL Document 8 Filed 04/10/07 Page 3 of 3
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2001


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41994
          69
          10
          11
          15
          33
          .187
          .026
          .032
          .037
          .0821995
          51
          -2
          14
          13
          25
          .131
          -.004
          .039
          .032
          .0611996
          95
          16
          27
          24
          30
          .240
          .039
          .070
          .058
          .0711997
          93
          6
          19
          19
          50
          .230
          .014
          .049
          .045
          .1121998
          87
          4
          15
          24
          45
          .198
          .008
          .036
          .051
          .0951999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          175
          34
          35
          48
          58
          .382
          .074
          .080
          .108
          .1282004
          129
          28
          17
          46
          38
          .284
          .062
          .039
          .099
          .0812005
          59
          8
          16
          12
          24
          .124
          .017
          .035
          .026
          .048 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 22, 2006
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1993...... 54 7 16 5 26 .155 .020 .049 .014 .069

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Bridget Hebert

Criminal No . 07-cr-19-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

27) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : September 10, 200 8

cc : James Dennehy, Esq .

Robert Veiga, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00019-JD Document 28 Filed 09/10/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2019-B9 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:March 30, 2022

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Benchmark 2019-B9 Certifications
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1312

To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to permit leave

after the death of a spouse for widows and widowers with minor children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

A BILL

To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to

permit leave after the death of a spouse for widows

and widowers with minor children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 102(a)(1) of the Family and Medical Leave

4 Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1)) is amended by adding

5 at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(E) Because of the death of the spouse,

7 in order to care for a son or daughter.’’.

Æ
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2003: Q4... 6.3 6.3 n.a. 6.1

2004: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 5.9

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.2

 Q3... 6.6 6.6 n.a. 6.3

 Q4... 6.8 6.8 n.a. 6.4

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.1 n.a. 6.6

 Q2... 7.3 7.3 n.a. 6.7

 Q3... 7.6 7.7 n.a. 7.0

 Q4... 8.0 8.0 n.a. 7.3

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2003: Q4... 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2

2004: Q1... 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q2... 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.1

 Q3... 7.4 7.4 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.0

2005: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.9 7.4

 Q2... 8.1 8.3 8.2 7.6

 Q3... 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.0

 Q4... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.1

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2003: Q4... 6.5 6.5 6.9 6.7

2004: Q1... 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.3

 Q2... 6.9 6.4 6.5 6.5

 Q3... 7.2 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q4... 7.4 7.0 7.1 6.9

2005: Q1... 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.2

 Q2... 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.7

 Q3... 8.1 8.0 8.0 7.9

 Q4... 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.0
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2003: Q4... n.a. 7.1 7.2 6.8

2004: Q1... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.7

 Q2... n.a. 7.1 7.1 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.7 7.7 7.3

 Q2... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.2 8.1 7.6

 Q4... n.a. 8.5 8.4 7.9

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2003: Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.6 6.7 6.4

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.7

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.9

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.4 7.1

 Q2... n.a. 7.7 7.7 7.3

 Q3... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.3 7.8

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2003: Q4... n.a. 6.5 6.9 7.3

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.3 7.0 7.1

 Q2... n.a. 6.8 7.2 7.1

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 7.4 7.8 7.7

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.7 7.9 7.8

 Q2... n.a. 7.5 7.9 7.9

 Q3... n.a. 8.3 8.2 8.1

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00249-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.H.T., J.H.T., J.R.T.H., J.I.T.V., B.Z.T.V., Minor Children

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CVL-002007-D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack 

of jurisdiction. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant because she

qualifies as an indigent under Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

It is so ORDERED on June 17, 2015.

_____________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Case 1:08-cv-00117-WES Document 9 Filed 05/07/08 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:08-cv-00117-WES Document 9 Filed 05/07/08 Page 2 of 2