alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1981...... 1 0 0 0 1

1982...... 2 3 3 3 11

1983...... 1 1 2 3 7

1984...... 3 7 10 12 32

1985...... 12 21 17 18 68

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Amanda Cossaboon

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00260-JL 

Maine Medical Center

 O R D E R

The defendant has filed two Motions to Dismiss: one for

insufficient service and lack of jurisdiction (document no. 12)

and one for non-compliance with the Maine Health Security Act

(document no. 13). In light of these filings, the preliminary

pretrial conference currently scheduled for Thursday, September

4th, is hereby continued until after the court resolves the

pending motions to dismiss filed in this case.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 3, 2008

cc: Heather M. Burns, Esq.

Gary B. Richardson, Esq.

Gerald F. Petruccelli, Esq.

Michael P. Lehman, Esq.

Sarah S. Murdough, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00260-JL Document 14 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Elfonca MITCHELL, aka, Pumpkin, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-35225.

D.C. No. CV-01-05140-JET, CR-92-01317-JET.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*730Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Keith Elfonca Mitchell appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his “Motion for Reinforcement of the Plea Agreement.” The district court construed Mitchell’s motion as a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to reach the merits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm.

Because Mitchell filed the instant motion after the statutory period for a § 2255 motion expired, the district court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2255 (imposing a one-year statute of limitations); *United States v. Monreal,*301 F.3d 1127, 1130-31, 1133 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 1008, 154 L.Ed.2d 925 (2003).

Nor may Mitchell “circumvent the requirements of AEDPA by simply styling the petition as a motion to enforce the plea agreement.” *Monreal,*301 F.3d at 1133; *see Garcia v. Bunnell,*33 F.3d 1193, 1195 (9th Cir.1994) (recognizing that this court “may affirm on any ground supported by the record, even if it differs from the reasoning of the district court.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Order entered January 29, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01418-CV

TOMMIE TUTT, Appellant

V.

THE POINT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-05188-C

ORDER

The reporter’s record is overdue and the court reporter has informed the Court that 

appellant has not requested preparation of the record. By letter dated January 17, 2020, we 

instructed appellant to provide written notice that he has requested preparation of the reporter’s 

record and written verification that he has paid the reporter’s fee or documentation that he has 

been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that 

failure to comply may result in an order that the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). As of today’s date, appellant has not complied. 

Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. 

Appellant shall file his brief on the merits WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gary Dewayne Johnson

v.

Angela Poulin, et al.

Civil No. 07-cv-161-PB

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $14.60 is due no later than July

6, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

SO ORDERED.

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 4, 2007

cc: Gary Dewayne Johnson, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00161-PB Document 4 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 1

Johnson v. Poulin et al Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1665

To prohibit the destruction during fiscal year 2002 of intercontinental ballistic

missile silos in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2001

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

A BILL

To prohibit the destruction during fiscal year 2002 of

intercontinental ballistic missile silos in the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE OF FUNDS DURING

4 FISCAL YEAR 2002 FOR DESTRUCTION OF

5 INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE

6 SILOS IN THE UNITED STATES.

7 During fiscal year 2002, no funds appropriated or

8 otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be
2

HR 1665 IH

1 used to carry out the destruction of any intercontinental

2 ballistic missile silo in the United States.

Æ
Order entered June 18, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00101-CV

STACEY DORFMAN KIVOWITZ, ET AL., Appellants

V.

LOUIS DORFMAN, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-13563

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant SCI Texas Funeral Services, LLC d/b/a 

Sparkman/Hillcrest Funeral Home and d/b/a Hillcrest Mausoleum and Memorial 

Park’s June 17, 2021 unopposed motion for extension of time to file its brief. As 

the briefing deadlines have been suspended pending disposition of appellee’s 

motion to dismiss, we DENY the motion as moot.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1688 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1688

 To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to instruct the United States 
Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund to oppose any new 
 loan by the International Monetary Fund to any country that is acting 
   to restrict oil production to the detriment of the United States 
              economy, except in emergency circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2001

    Mr. Saxton (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Duncan, Mr. McHugh, Mr. 
  Schaffer, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Pitts, and Mr. Paul) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to instruct the United States 
Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund to oppose any new 
 loan by the International Monetary Fund to any country that is acting 
   to restrict oil production to the detriment of the United States 
              economy, except in emergency circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPPOSITION BY THE UNITED STATES TO ANY NEW LOAN BY THE IMF 
              TO ANY COUNTRY ACTING TO RESTRICT OIL PRODUCTION TO THE 
              DETRIMENT OF THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY; EXCEPTION.

    Title XV of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 
(XV 262o--262o-2) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 1504. OPPOSITION BY THE UNITED STATES TO ANY NEW LOAN BY THE IMF 
              TO ANY COUNTRY ACTING TO RESTRICT OIL PRODUCTION TO THE 
              DETRIMENT OF THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY; EXCEPTION.

    ``The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States 
Executive Director at the Fund to use the voice, vote, and influence of 
the United States to oppose any new loan by the Fund to any country 
which the Secretary of Energy determines is a member of the 
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and is acting to restrict 
oil production to the detriment of the United States economy, or is 
acting in concert with that organization to do so, unless the provision 
of the loan is necessary to address a systemic risk to the 
international financial system.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1661 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 47
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1661

                          [Report No. 107-91]

   To extend indefinitely the authority of the States of Washington, 
  Oregon, and California to manage a Dungeness crab fishery until the 
 effective date of a fishery management plan for the fishery under the 
       Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2001

Mr. George Miller of California (for himself and Mr. Walden of Oregon) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

                              June 6, 2001

             Additional sponsors: Mr. Inslee and Mr. Baird

                              June 6, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend indefinitely the authority of the States of Washington, 
  Oregon, and California to manage a Dungeness crab fishery until the 
 effective date of a fishery management plan for the fishery under the 
       Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF STATES OF WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND 
              CALIFORNIA TO MANAGE DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY.

    Section 203 of the Act entitled ``An Act to approve a governing 
international fishery agreement between the United States and the 
Republic of Poland, and for other purposes'', approved November 13, 
1998 (Public Law 105-384; 16 U.S.C. 1856 note), is amended by striking 
subsection (i).

                                                  Union Calendar No. 47

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1661

                          [Report No. 107-91]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To extend indefinitely the authority of the States of Washington, 
  Oregon, and California to manage a Dungeness crab fishery until the 
 effective date of a fishery management plan for the fishery under the 
       Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 6, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
II

Calendar No. 305

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1432

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 18), 2001

Received and read the first time

JANUARY 23, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1432 PCS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Major Lyn

5 McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 20,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 305

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1432

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3698 Inner Perimeter Road

in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Major LynMcIntosh Post Office Building’’.

JANUARY 23, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1767 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1767

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 205 South Main Street in Culpepper, Virginia, as the ``D. French 
                   Slaughter Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

Mr. Wolf (for himself, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Schrock, Mr. 
Scott, Mr. Goode, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. 
Boucher, and Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 205 South Main Street in Culpepper, Virginia, as the ``D. French 
                   Slaughter Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. D. FRENCH SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 205 South Main Street in Culpepper, Virginia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``D. French Slaughter Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the D. French 
Slaughter Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 06-cr-49-01-SM

Wanderlei Martins-Campos

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 13) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2006 trial period. Defendant has filed a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:06-cr-00049-SM Document 14 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: July 21, 2006 at 4:45 PM

Jury Selection: August 1, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

April 20, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Mark Zuckerman, Esq.

 Michael Shklar, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00049-SM Document 14 Filed 04/20/06 Page 2 of 2
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 30, 2003
Opinion filed December 1 , 2011



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 11

- 11

- 00194

- C V

__________ MARVIN RAY HAILE , Appellant

V.

VERGIE LEE FELTON ET AL

. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 4 2nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 47 , 781

- A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant, Marvin Ray Haile, filed a notice of appeal on July 25, 2011. However, a
clerk‟s record has not been filed
, and no filing fee has been paid. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Upon receipt of appellant‟s notice of appeal, the clerk of this court notified him in a letter dated July 25, 2011, that a filing fee of $175 was due. This letter further a dvised appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within fifteen days. Appellant responded to the clerk‟s initial letter by filing a “Motion to File as „In Formia Pauperis ‟ ” [sic] on2

August 4, 2011. The court overru led this motion and notified appellant in a letter dated August 18 , 2011. This letter further advised appellant to immediately forward the $175 filing fee. Appellant did not do so. On September 16, 2011, the clerk notified appellant by letter that the c lerk of the trial

court ha d notified this court that appellant ha d not made arrangements to pay for the clerk‟s
record

. T he clerk of this court requested that appellant forward proof by October 6, 2011, that he made arrangements to pay for the clerk‟s rec ord

. The clerk‟s letter of September 16, 2011
, also informed appellant that the failure to provide the requested proof by the date indicated could result in the dismissal of this appeal . Additionally, the clerk wrote an additional letter to appellant on S eptember 16, 2011, informing him that the failure to pay the required filing fee by October 6, 2011, c ould result in the dismissal of this appeal. There has been no r esponse to the
clerk‟ s l etter s of September 16, 2011, other than various motions forwarde d by appellant that have not been filed because appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee for this appeal or the $10 filing fee for each motion.
The failure to file the clerk‟ s record and pay the required filing fee appears to be due to appellant‟ s acts and omissions. Therefore, pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b) and 42.3(b), the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

December 1 , 2011 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Kalenak , J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 07-cr-92-PB

FNU LNU

O R D E R

Defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the June

5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing newly retained counsel

and the need for additional time to complete discovery and

prepare a defense. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to September 5, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00092-PB Document 12 Filed 05/15/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 25, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to

August 27, 2007 at 3:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 15, 2007

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Richard Monteith, Jr., Esq.

Alfred J.T. Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00092-PB Document 12 Filed 05/15/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES POULSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1 MM 2024

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of May, 2024, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is 

DENIED.