alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



                              /s/ Robert P. Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 8, 2003




                              /s/ Patrick W. Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 8, 2003
Chart 1

Number, Size, and Volume of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2007

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

1

2

3

4

5

Number of non-real-estate farm loans Millions, annual rate

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

10

20

30

40

50

60

Average size of non-real-estate farm loans Thousands of dollars

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

25

50

75

100

125

Volume of non-real-estate farm loans

3

Billions of dollars, annual rate
Chart 2

Maturity and Interest Rate of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2007

 Note. Effective (compounded) annual interest rates are calculated from the stated rate and other

 terms of the loans and weighted by loan size.

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4

8

12

16

Average maturity of non-real-estate farm loans 20

Months

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4

8

12

16

Average effective interest rate on non-real-estate farm loans 20

Percent

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

0

25

50

75

100 Share of farm loans with a floating interest rate

4

Percent
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
                                 Estimated volume                  Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                               (percent)
                      _______________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
1997......    |          93       6      19       19       50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4      15       24       45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18      37       35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11      17       34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67      53      140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40      50       58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34      35       48       58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28      17       46       38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8      16       12       24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
2006......    |          73       9       7       23       34      .146      .018      .015     .045      .064
2007......    |          90       8      13       23       47      .170      .014      .025     .042      .085
2008......    |        n.a.      12      20     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .022      .037     n.a.      n.a.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
EXHIBIT 4.2

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST  AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING  SERVICES  AGREEMENT,  dated May 6,
2004  (the  "First  Amendment"),  is by  and  between  Nicole  Van  Coller  (the
"Consultant"), and NANNACO, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Client").

                                    RECITALS

         A. The  Consultant  and the Client  entered into a Consulting  Services
Agreement  dated March 15, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A
(the  "Agreement"),  pursuant to which the Consultant  agreed to provide certain
consulting services to the Client.

         B. Client and  Consultant  wish to amend  Section 2 of the Agreement to
provide for  additional  consideration  in exchange  for  additional  consulting
services.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  foregoing,  and the mutual
agreements, representations,  warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other  good  and  valuable   consideration   the  receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.  Section 2 of the  Agreement  shall be deleted in its  entirety and is hereby
amended to read as follows:

"2.      Consideration.

         Client agrees to pay Consultant,  as her fee and as  consideration  for
services provided, 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Client. By amendment
dated May 6, 2004 Client agrees to pay Consultant an additional 7,500,000 shares
of common stock of the Client, which shares shall be registered on Form S-8."

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                            CLIENT:

                                            NANNACO, INC.


                                            By:
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Steve Careaga - CEO


                                            CONSULTANT:


                                            By:
                                                ------------------------------
                                            Name: Nicole Van Coller
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      18,812,000
<SECURITIES>                                14,145,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,301,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   307,000
<INVENTORY>                                    790,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,371,000
<PP&E>                                      12,205,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,093,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,548,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,191,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    55,545,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,952,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,548,000
<SALES>                                      6,557,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,557,000
<CGS>                                        3,385,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,553,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             328,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,138,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,138,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 27, 2019 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2019-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2022, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2022.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Anthony LaFauci

v. Case No. 08-cv-77-PB

NH State Prison, Warden

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated March 13, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

April 6, 2009 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Anthony LaFauci, Pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00077-PB Document 20 Filed 04/06/09 Page 1 of 1
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, November 1-5Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,066,990 29,951 54,138 78,107 103,885 171,2Number of loans 16,922 7,536 3,580 2,287 1,587 1,1Weighted average maturity (months)1 18.72 8.02 8.73 10.77 12.34 24.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.28 1.53 2.20 3.02 2.24 5.7Weighted average risk rating3 3.10 3.25 3.22 3.12 3.11 3.

Weighted average interest rate4 5.16 6.62 6.25 6.25 5.75 5.

 Standard error5 .26 .29 .25 .19 .28 . Interquartile range6 75th percentile 5.96 7.64 7.23 7.17 6.77 5. 25th percentile 4.08 5.64 5.13 5.12 4.85 4. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.45 6.36 6.21 6.44 6.11 5.4 Other livestock 4.58 6.43 6.39 6.44 5.43 4. Other current operating expenses7 5.34 6.73 6.34 6.40 5.91 4.

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.33 6.50 6.01 5.91 5.81 5. Farm real estate 6.06 6.87 6.02 6.62 6.23 5. Other8 4.66 5.83 5.88 5.58 5.14 5.0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 82.01 85.03 81.78 77.61 81.85 89. Under commitment 86.11 92.21 84.13 82.75 83.00 85.0 Callable 29.58 30.39 30.32 34.51 32.11 20. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 14.69 4.69 5.82 10.97 16.51 9. Other livestock 12.18 4.37 5.79 6.06 11.24 11.7 Other current operating expenses7 34.00 75.71 67.05 58.53 42.81 37.

 Farm machinery and equipment 11.75 5.47 9.33 4.67 7.62 14. Farm real estate 6.20 1.81 2.70 2.89 3.14 8. Other8 21.18 7.95 9.32 16.87 18.68 18.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 6.55 3.63 2.75 6.13 5.74 11. Other 87.43 89.53 91.09 85.80 87.13 84. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen Gilmore McCabe

v. Civil No. 08-00055-JL

Kendal at Hanover et al. 

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

May 5, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. will include a substantive, meaningful

discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. Counsel are

expected to be prepared to engage in an open, cooperative

discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of the

obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:08-cv-00055-JL Document 9 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

April 25, 2008

cc: Heather M. Burns, Esq.

Lauren S. Irwin, Esq.

Daniel Miville Deschenes, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00055-JL Document 9 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:03-cr-00101-SM   Document 13   Filed 11/07/06   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of StemGen, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Simon Dawson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: February 27, 2020BY: /s/ Simon DawsonSimon DawsonCEO and Chairman of the Board  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3293-EM]


Florida; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Florida (FEMA-3293-EM), dated September 7, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective September 12, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21976 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen Gilmore McCabe

v. Civil No. 08-00055-JL

Kendal of Hanover et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

May 5, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document #8) is approved as submitted,

with the following changes:

• ADR: The deadline for notifying the court if the

parties will undertake ADR is July 1, 2008.

By agreement of the parties, the 6th Affirmative Defense

(both Statute of Limitations and failure-to-exhaust

administrative remedies) is stricken.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: May 5, 2008

cc: Heather M. Burns, Esq.

Lauren W. Irwin, Esq.

Daniel Miville Deschenes, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00055-JL Document 10 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 1
#### Zuri S. YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.A. TERHUNE, Director; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 99-55287.

D.C. No. CV-98-06530-AHM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*266Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 17, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Zuri S. Young, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. Reviewing de novo, *Miles v. Prunty,*187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), we vacate and remand.

Young delayed 13 months after the California Court of Appeals denied his habeas petition before filing a new habeas petition in the California Supreme Court. However, that court addressed his petition on the merits and made no finding that he had unreasonably delayed. Young therefore may be entitled to statutory tolling from April 24, 1996 to February 27, 1998, which may render his federal petition timely. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244; *Saffold v. Carey,*312 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2003); *Bunney v. Mitchell,*262 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam). Accordingly, we vacate and remand so that the district court may reconsider in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Carey v. Saffold,*536 U.S. 214, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (2002), and this Court’s decision on remand in *Saffold v. Carey.**1*

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. All outstanding motions are denied as moot.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kelley Nault

v. Civil No. 07-cv-00387-JL

Concord Housing Authority

 O R D E R

The motion for preliminary and permanent injunction (doc.

#3) and the emergency motion to consolidate hearing on injunction

with hearing on merits (doc. #4) are DENIED without prejudice to

being reinstated upon the filing of a Notice of Reinstatement. 

(A new motion need not be filed; filing of the Notice of

Reinstatement will suffice.) This order was necessitated by the

court’s order continuing and expanding deadlines at the parties’

request which, in effect, has stayed the proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: August 6, 2008

cc: Stephanie Anne Bray, Esq.

Michael G. Perez, Esq.

Brian C. Shaughnessy, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00387-JL Document 12 Filed 08/06/08 Page 1 of 1