alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1766 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1766

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ``Stan Parris 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1766

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ``Stan Parris 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4270 
John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Stan Parris Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan Parris Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55083-55084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22473]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements

[[Page 55084]]

under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments 
on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears 
in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the 
Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or contacting the Office of 
Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97e3e5f6f3f2f6f9f6fbeee4fee4d7f1faf4b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aedadccfcacbcfc0cfc2d7ddc7ddeec8c3cd80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 010982-044.
    Title: Florida-Bahamas Shipowners and Operators Association.
    Parties: Atlantic Caribbean Line, Inc.; Bernuth Lines, Ltd.; 
Crowley Liner Services, Inc.; Seaboard Marine, Ltd.; Seafreight Line, 
Ltd.; and Tropical Shipping and Construction Co., Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes Pioneer Shipping Ltd. as a party to 
the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 011953-006.
    Title: Florida Shipowners Group Agreement.
    Parties: The member lines of the Caribbean Shipowners Association 
and the Florida-Bahamas Shipowners and Operators Association.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rhode, Esq., Sher & Blackwell, LLP, 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment reflects the resignation of Pioneer 
Shipping Ltd. from the Florida-Bahamas Shipowners and Operators 
Association.

    Agreement No.: 012049.
    Title: Amazon Service Agreement.
    Parties: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. and Bringer Corporation, dba 
Bringer Lines.
    Filing Party: Howard A. Levy, Esq., 80 Wall Street, Suite 1117, New 
York, NY 10005.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes the parties to share vessel 
space in the trade between United States ports and ports in the 
Caribbean and Brazil.

    Agreement No.: 012050.
    Title: SeaFreight /Zim Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: SeaFreight Line, Ltd. and Zim Integrated Shipping 
Services, Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M 
Street, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The agreement would authorize SeaFreight to charter space 
to Zim in the trade between Port Everglades, FL, and Kingston, Jamaica.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22473 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
____________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2           Q3            Q4           Total
____________________________________________________________________________________

1984......    |             3           7            10            12             32
1985......    |            12          21            17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14            21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19            12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6            12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7             5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5             6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2             3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1             1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2             2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0             0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0             0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2             0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0             0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0             1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0             0             1              2
2003......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2004......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2005......    |             0           0          n.a.          n.a.           n.a.
____________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1750

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize funding

for the State water pollution control revolving fund program for fiscal

years 2002 through 2006.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mr. DINGELL (for himself, Mr. DOYLE, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr.

BONIOR, Mr. FRANK, Mr. COYNE, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. BOUCHER, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr.

BROWN of Ohio, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. CLEMENT,

Mr. JOHN, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. GORDON, Mr.

BALDACCI, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr.

MATSUI, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. JEFFERSON, Ms. SOLIS, and Mr. KILDEE)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize funding for the State water pollution control revolving fund program for fiscal years 2002 through

2006.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Water State Re5 volving Fund Enhancement Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1750 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 607 of the Federal Water

3 Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1387) is amended by

4 striking ‘‘the following sums:’’and all that follows through

5 the period at the end of paragraph (5) and inserting

6 ‘‘$5,400,000,000 per fiscal year for each of fiscal years

7 2002 through 2006.’’.

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

9 602(b)(2)(6) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1382(b)(2)(6)) is

10 amended by striking ‘‘before fiscal year 1995’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Walter Norton

#03327-049

U.S. Penitentiary Canaan

PO Box 300

Waymart, PA 18472

ORDER - FILING FEE OMITTED

In re: File No. 1:06-fp-477, Walter Norton v. Cross Border Initiative Task Force, et al

The above-captioned action was received by the court on December 21, 2006, but items

necessary to docket the case were not included. Either the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis must be submitted to the court by March 1, 2007.

Filing Fee. Filing fee in the amount of $350, may be in cash, certified bank check or money

order (made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court), or by credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover,

Diners Club, or American Express). The court does not accept personal checks.

- O R -

In Forma Pauperis . If in forma pauperis status is sought:

• Certificate of Custodial Institution (USDCNH-14 or substantially similar filing) completed

by an official at the institution

• Financial Declaration (USDCNH-15 or substantially similar filing)

This action will not be considered a civil case or any action taken until the appropriate fee

has been received or in forma pauperis status has been granted.

By the Court,

/s/ Janice E. Boucher

December 29, 2006 Janice E. Boucher

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:06-fp-00477 Document 3 Filed 12/29/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-128-PB

Talbot Curtin

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

October 10, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and prepare a defense. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from October 10, 2007 to February 5, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00128-PB Document 10 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 1, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 28, 2008 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 28, 2007

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00128-PB Document 10 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2
(January 31, 2006)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason Walker, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 223]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered December 18, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Other participants in the crime made inculpatory statements that also inculpated defendant and provided the investigating detectives with probable cause for his arrest. In particular, one of the perpetrators made a videotaped statement that specified defendant’s role in the crime, and the record establishes that this statement was part of the evidence before the suppression court. Although the detectives who arrested defendant did not testify, the only reasonable inference that can be drawn from the evidence is that these detectives, who were working on the same investigation, acted on the basis of a communication from the detective who had interviewed the other perpetrators *(see People v Gonzalez,*91 NY2d 909, 910 [1998]; *People v Mims, 88*NY2d 99, 113-114 [1996]; *People v Johnson,*281 AD2d 183 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 903 [2001]).

The court’s curative actions were sufficient to prevent defendant from being prejudiced by uncharged crimes evidence *(see People v Davis,*58 NY2d 1102, 1104 [1983]; *People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865 [1981]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from making a misleading summation argument that would have taken unfair advantage of a prior ruling that had excluded certain evidence *(see People v Tankleff,*84 NY2d 992 [1994]; *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 399 [1981]; *see also*
      *505
      *People v Scarola,*71 NY2d 769, 777 [1988]). To the extent that defendant is raising a constitutional claim, such claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find it to be without merit.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including his Confrontation Clause argument, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gilbert Maurice Goudreau

v. Case No. 06-cv-403-SM

Col. George Nathaniel Washington 

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 31, 2007, no objection having been filed, for the reasons

set forth therein. Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

February 26, 2007 ______________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe 

 Chief Judge 

cc: Gilbert Maurice Goudreau, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00403-SM Document 7 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 1
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1991...... 31.86 60.97 25.25 15.56 15.08 129.31 3.64 14.90 46.59 539.87 

1992...... 31.18 68.23 26.89 14.73 15.94 108.68 3.70 14.82 45.85 468.20 

1993...... 34.28 79.68 23.07 15.25 13.91 111.99 3.71 14.94 46.12 490.33 

1994...... 33.91 60.27 27.58 16.29 17.54 123.60 3.72 14.57 46.98 480.70 

1995...... 33.77 49.68 26.74 18.46 15.59 93.60 3.73 14.72 44.94 451.25 

1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 

1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 

1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 

1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 

2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 

2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 1999: Q3... 21.40 30.07 25.08 17.02 26.64 43.96 3.71 14.56 45.94 261.26 

 Q4... 31.47 46.45 33.15 24.91 25.91 54.53 4.09 14.90 46.67 242.08 2000: Q1... 31.07 38.53 29.88 27.57 47.97 43.51 3.82 15.15 47.72 256.28 

 Q2... 25.36 40.29 23.29 20.10 23.30 58.50 3.97 14.76 45.62 255.62 

 Q3... 22.88 56.90 23.79 18.06 25.56 36.16 3.50 14.83 43.59 273.03  Q4... 25.90 40.24 27.02 18.56 20.65 54.79 4.16 15.11 44.23 252.17 

2001: Q1... 33.29 30.14 25.26 24.29 34.58 78.43 3.91 15.23 46.59 274.01  Q2... 26.91 31.36 29.51 19.30 41.18 47.15 3.89 14.50 44.07 263.70 

 Q3... 23.23 43.62 27.17 16.20 23.42 46.14 3.70 14.68 43.97 255.59 

 Q4... 35.30 51.03 37.52 21.12 22.89 83.12 4.01 14.69 47.12 280.16 2002: Q1... 33.13 48.19 33.07 25.93 26.71 60.82 3.65 15.01 47.55 237.43 

 Q2... 23.72 41.55 32.41 18.55 19.26 48.30 3.69 15.06 45.28 216.61 

 Q3... 28.88 48.00 28.87 21.00 30.85 75.68 3.69 14.83 44.27 329.62  Q4... 31.46 52.06 38.39 22.16 17.78 67.64 3.85 15.19 46.02 333.67 

2003: Q1... 35.98 68.86 32.35 27.73 38.74 62.19 3.72 14.88 46.71 249.54  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Case 1:07-cv-00304-SM   Document 28   Filed 12/04/09   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-00304-SM   Document 28   Filed 12/04/09   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Covance Inc. ("Covance") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph L. Herring, President and Chief Executive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date:
July 25, 2005

/s/ JOSEPH L. HERRINGJoseph L. Herring
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Troy T. Cornock

v. Civil No. 07-cv-00391-JL

Bank of America, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

July 31, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. will include a substantive, meaningful

discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. Counsel are

expected to be prepared to engage in an open, cooperative

discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of the

obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JL Document 27 Filed 07/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 21, 2008

cc: Leonard A. Bennett, Esq.

Roger B. Phillips, Esq.

Bruce C. Luckman, Esq.

William E. Christie, Esq.

Sacha A. Boegem, Esq.

Kimberly J.H. Memmesheimer, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00391-JL Document 27 Filed 07/21/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.24


 


January 23, 2017


 


Adam Pliska


CEO & President


WPT Enterprises, Inc.


1920 Main Street, Suite 1150


Irvine, California 92614


 


Re: World Poker Tour TBD Programming – Number of Episodes
to be Supplied


 


Dear Adam:


 


We refer to the agreement, dated as of May 24, 2016 (as amended,
the “Agreement”), between WPT Enterprises, Inc. (“WPTE”) and National Sports Programming (“Fox”),
pursuant to which Fox will distribute episodes of the World Poker Tour television series and TBD Programming. Any defined terms
used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.


 


WPTE and Fox hereby agree that the second full paragraph of
Section 1 of Exhibit A of the Agreement is amended and restated as follows:


 


“TBD Programming: In each Season, WPTE will
supply to Fox eight (8) fully produced and broadcast quality sixty (60) minute (between forty-two minutes twenty-one seconds (42:21)
and forty-four minutes twenty-one seconds (44:21) of content as determined by Fox) episodes of original programming (the “TBD
Episodes” and together with the Tour Episodes, “Episodes”). The TBD Episodes will be composed of mutually agreed
upon content connected with WPTE.”


 


Except as set forth herein, the Agreement will not otherwise
be changed, altered or amended and remains in full force and effect. This letter agreement, together with the Agreement, constitutes
the entire understanding and agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the Agreement.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    




 


 


If the above confirms your understanding, please signify your
acceptance by signing below.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


NATIONAL SPORTS PROGRAMMING


 


 


 


By: _______________________________


Name: _____________________________


Title: ______________________________


 


Agreed and Accepted by:


 


WPT ENTERPRISES, INC.


 


 


 


By: ________________________________


Name: _____________________________


Title: ______________________________


 




 


 






    	 	2
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Energy, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EdwardG. Caminos, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to andsolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledgeand belief, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/ Edward G. Caminos* | * * |   |   |
|-------------------------|----------|--------|--------|
| Edward G. Caminos       |     |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |     |   |
| August 9, 2007          |     |   |

 

4

----