alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-62,404] 

                    On January 8, 2008, the Department of Labor (Department) received a request for administrative reconsideration of the Department's Notice of Negative Determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on November 30, 2007. The Department's Notice of Determination Regarding ATAA was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 11, 2007 (72 FR 70346).                 

The negative determination was based on the Department's findings that the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are easily transferable. 

In the request for reconsideration, a worker alleged that “salaries at other factories in similar jobs are much lower” than wages paid by the subject firm. 

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of January 2008. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E8-2240 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of MCSi, Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three months
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Registrant.

|                       |  | /s/MICHAEL E. PEPPELName: Michael E. Peppel
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date November 13, 2002 |  |                                                                                         

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with  Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly  report of Manchester
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Elan Yaish, Vice  President-Finance,  Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:   July 5, 2005           /S/  Elan Yaish
                               -----------------
                               Elan Yaish
                               Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer
                               and Principal Accounting Officer



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Tony L. Ellison

v.

NH Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 07-fp-131

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $12.40 is due no later than June

20, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-131-SM.

SO ORDERED.

__________

es R. Muirhead

ted States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 10, 2007

cc: Tony L. Ellison, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00131-JL Document 6 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32(a)



                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO




         The  undersigned, C. John Wilder, President and Chief Executive of
TXU Corp.  (the  "Company"),  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
         September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

   2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 9th day of November, 2004.




                                 /s/ C. John Wilder
                         ------------------------------------------------
                         Name:    C. John Wilder
                         Title:   President and Chief Executive









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**March 2005**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: August 25, 2005**
#### GRAHAM v. MANUFACTURERS CAS. INS. CO. et al.

No. 8174.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 25, 1954.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1954.

Jackson, Mayer & Kennedy, Shreveport, for appellants.

Hobbs & Yeates, Mindem for appellee.

Gravel & Downs, Alexandria, for inter-venor.

GLADNEY, Judge.

Francis A. Graham, plaintiff and appel-lee herein, suffered personal injuries in the accident of December 11, 1951, on U. S. Highway 80 involving a truck in which he was a passenger. Our findings on the issues of fact and law given in Vowell v. Manufacturer’s Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., 73 So.2d 583, are equally applicable to the instant case and our decision therein is controlling here.

In addition to our conclusions in the Vowell decision we find defendant’s plea of contributory negligence meritorious as we think Graham’s negligence was the proximate cause of the accident.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment from which appealed be and the same is hereby annulled, set aside and reversed and plaintiff’s action dismissed. It is further ordered that the judgment in favor of the intervenor is annulled, set aside and reversed and intervenor’s claim is denied. Costs to be prorated equally between plaintiffs.

AYRES, J., concurs in the decree.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANIBAL SILVA; RAMON SILVAREYES,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

CYNTHIA GONZALES; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-55898

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-01587-CABKSC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Anibal Silva and Ramon Silva-Reyes appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their action alleging violations of federal, state, and

international law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

FILED

AUG 04 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
novo, Myers v. Bennett Law Offices, 238 F.3d 1068, 1071 (9th Cir. 2001), and we

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action for improper venue because

no defendant is alleged to reside in the Southern District of California, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391(b)(1), and no “part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim[s]

occurred” there, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

The district court properly determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction

over the Nicaraguan defendants because plaintiffs failed to allege facts sufficient to

establish that the Nicaraguan defendants have “continuous and systematic”

contacts with California that “approximate physical presence,” Schwarzenegger v.

Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 801 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted) (general jurisdiction), or that their claims arose out of or

relate to the Nicaraguan defendants’ forum-related activities, id. at 802 (specific

jurisdiction). Contrary to plaintiffs’ contentions, Rules 4(k)(1) & (2) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure do not confer personal jurisdiction over defendants.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion

for leave to file a second amended complaint because the proposed complaint did

not remedy the jurisdictional deficiencies and further amendment would be futile. 

2 14-55898
See AE ex rel. Hernandez v. Cty. of Tulare, 666 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 2012)

(setting forth standard of review).

We do not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Appellant’s August 7, 2014, October 20, 2014, and December 3, 2015

requests for judicial notice, and December 26, 2015 request that the court refer

appellees to the United States Department of Justice, are denied.

Appellant’s December 4, 2015 motion for miscellaneous relief is granted. 

The Clerk shall remove Docket Entry No. 34-2 from the docket and shall replace it

with Docket Entry No. 35-2.

AFFIRMED.

3 14-55898
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2003,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 11, 2003



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 11, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-43-01-SM

Michael Croteau

O R D E R

Defendant Croteau’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document no. 17). Trial has been rescheduled for the

September 2005 trial period. Defendant Croteau shall file a waiver of speedy

trial rights not later than June 13, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 31, 2005 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 7, 2005 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00043-SM Document 18 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 2, 2005

cc: Stephen T. Jeffco, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00043-SM Document 18 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSCRYPT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,111
<INVENTORY>                                     12,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,563
<PP&E>                                          11,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,806
<SALES>                                          9,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,709
<CGS>                                            7,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (143)<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,957)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
<FN>
<F1>Interest expense is net of $311 of interest and other income less $168 of
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Walter Norton

v. Civil No. 06-cv-282-JD

United States

O R D E R

The court of appeals has remanded this case for

consideration of Walter Norton's pro se motion to vacate his

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Norton contends that his

counsel was constitutionally ineffective in failing to appeal an

issue related to his sentence. Norton filed a memorandum in

support of his motion the day after judgment was entered

dismissing the motion. With the memorandum, Norton filed a

letter from counsel that indicated Norton had requested but

counsel declined to file an appeal.

Defense "counsel has a constitutionally imposed duty to

consult with the defendant about an appeal when there is reason

to think either (1) that a rational defendant would want to

appeal (for example, because there are nonfrivolous grounds for

appeal), or (2) that this particular defendant reasonably

demonstrated to counsel that he was interested in appealing." 

Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 480 (2000). Counsel's

representation is constitutionally deficient if he or she fails

Case 1:06-cv-00282-JD Document 21 Filed 05/23/07 Page 1 of 2
2

to follow a defendant's express instruction with respect to an

appeal. Id. at 478. In deciding whether counsel's failure to

file an appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel, the

court considers the totality of the circumstances, including what

counsel knew or should have known and, in the case of a guilty

plea, "whether the defendant received the sentence bargained for

as part of the plea and whether the plea expressly reserved or

waived some or all appeal rights." Id. at 480.

To address the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in

the circumstances of this case, a hearing will be held with

Norton, his former counsel, James Gleason, Assistant United

States Attorney Donald Feith, and United States Probation Officer

Cathy Battistelli. The date of the hearing will be set by the

deputy clerk.

 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 23, 2007

cc: Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, Esquire

Walter Norton, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00282-JD Document 21 Filed 05/23/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32(a)


                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO




         The undersigned,  Erle Nye,  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
of TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
         September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

   2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 12th day of November, 2003.




                                                    /s/ Erle Nye
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Name:    Erle Nye
                                       Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                                Executive





  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William C. Adair, Jr., hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Direct General
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Direct General Corporation.


November 13, 2003        By: /s/ William C. Adair, Jr.
-----------------            --------------------------------------------------
      Date                                     (Signature)
                         Name: William C. Adair, Jr.
                               ------------------------------------------------
                         Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
                                -----------------------------------------------