alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mrs. Nell Thibodeaux BERGERON v. Louis SAIA et al.

No. 3069.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1949.

Writ of Certiorari Denied March 21, 1949.

Deutsch Kerrigan & Stiles, of New Orleans, Ellender & Wright, of Houma,' and H. R. Ainsworth, of New Orleans, for appellants.

A. Deutsche O’Neal, of Houma, for ap-pellees.

St. Clair Adams, Jr., of New Orleans, and Harold J. Bodin, of Houma, for inter- " venor.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff and defendants have filed applications for rehearing.

Plaintiff, Mrs. Nell Thibodaux Bergeron, individually and as natural tutrix of her minors, in her application for rehearing, contends that we erred in reducing the awards made by the trial court to her and to her minor children rather than grant them an increase. After a reconsideration of the case, we are firm in our opinion that the awards made by us do substantial justice among the parties in this case. However, we find that through inadvertence, we lowered the award due to plaintiff for burial expenses by the sum of $5.50. This error will be corrected.

The chief complaint of the defendants, in their application for rehearing, is the brevity of our reasons for the affirmance of the judgment holding the defendants liable. After reviewing the record, we could see no useful purpose in setting out the substance of the testimony of each witness and discussing the same. We were reviewing a case involving purely a question of fact. We could find no manifest error in the finding of fact of the trial judge relative to finding liability against the driver of the Saia truck. The defendants complain of our laying too much stress on the testimony of Harold Dean and the overlooking of the testimony of Harold Verret, the driver of the Saia truck. The 'trial court, in his reason for judgment, favorably commented on the testimony of Harold Dean. We see no reason to disagree with the trial court. The trial court did not accept the version of Harold Verret as to how the accident happened and neither can we.

Our decree is amended by increasing the award of Mrs. Nell Thibodaux Bergeron by the sum of $5.50, making a total award to her of the sum of $10,555.50. The applications for rehearing are refused.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. German ORTIZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50277.

D.C. No. CR-00-00150-AHS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2002.*

Decided Jan. 28, 2003.

Before CHOY, FERGUSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

German Ortiz pleaded guilty to one count of being an illegal alien in possession *689of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5). In his plea agreement, Ortiz reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ortiz’s counsel admitted at the suppression hearing that Ortiz had consented to the search on June 28, 2000, but argued that the consent was limited to searching for Edgar Basurto. We review for clear error the trial court’s findings about the scope of a suspect’s consent to search, asking what the typical reasonable person would have understood from the exchange between the officers and the suspect. *United States v. Cannon,*29 F.3d 472, 477 (9th Cir.1994).

The officers asked if they could come in and look for Basurto, and Ortiz and his wife Patricia Berrelleza consented. Berrelleza also got the keys and opened the bedroom closet for the officers. The district court did not clearly err in concluding that the closet was within the scope of the search, as a reasonable person would have understood that the search of a closet large enough to hold a fugitive was within the scope of a search for Basurto.

Because the June 28 search was not illegal, it did not taint the consent search on July 3, 2002.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1991...... 82.8 21.4 5.8 25.5 2.5 27.6 6.1 7.6 15.1 54.0 

1992...... 83.7 23.6 6.7 24.6 2.9 26.0 6.2 8.0 16.8 52.8 

1993...... 92.6 28.7 6.2 24.7 2.5 30.6 6.1 8.3 17.1 61.0 

1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 

1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 

1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 

1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 

1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 

1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 

2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 

2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 

1999: Q3... 43.9 2.2 3.2 25.0 5.1 8.4 4.6 6.4 13.2 19.7  Q4... 47.0 7.1 5.0 22.0 3.4 9.4 3.0 5.3 13.7 24.9 2000: Q1... 59.4 3.6 4.8 37.6 6.3 7.1 4.1 6.6 12.7 36.0  Q2... 57.4 4.8 4.4 31.5 4.1 12.7 5.1 7.9 15.1 29.3 

 Q3... 42.6 5.1 3.7 23.4 3.0 7.4 3.8 6.3 11.3 21.2  Q4... 41.2 5.8 5.1 17.8 2.3 10.2 3.7 5.3 11.4 20.8 

2001: Q1... 54.3 3.6 4.3 23.7 4.7 18.0 3.3 5.7 13.9 31.4 

 Q2... 58.0 4.1 5.5 25.9 6.7 15.9 4.8 7.1 14.1 32.1 

 Q3... 38.6 4.1 3.5 17.7 2.8 10.5 3.7 5.3 10.2 19.5 

 Q4... 55.6 8.4 5.6 19.4 2.4 19.8 3.2 5.6 12.5 34.3 

2002: Q1... 58.5 6.5 5.4 28.5 3.4 14.7 3.3 5.8 16.1 33.2 

 Q2... 57.9 4.7 5.0 33.1 2.5 12.6 5.3 7.9 15.3 29.4 

 Q3... 56.4 3.3 4.1 29.4 4.3 15.3 4.3 6.0 12.7 33.4 

 Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 

2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9 

 Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
___________________________________________________________________________

                    Other operating  Intermediate non-real-  Long-term real
Quarter                 loans 1           estate loans        estate loans
___________________________________________________________________________

  Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)
___________________________________________________________________________
2001: Q2...    |                9.3                     9.1             8.5
      Q3...    |                8.8                     8.7             8.1
      Q4...    |                7.9                     7.7             7.2

2002: Q1...    |                7.4                     7.5             7.0
      Q2...    |                7.2                     7.2             6.8
      Q3...    |                6.8                     6.7             6.4
      Q4...    |                6.7                     6.6             6.3

2003: Q1...    |                6.5                     6.4             6.1
      Q2...    |                6.3                     6.2             5.9
___________________________________________________________________________

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)
___________________________________________________________________________
2001: Q2...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q3...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q4...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.

2002: Q1...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q2...    |                7.7                     7.6             7.1
      Q3...    |                7.5                     7.4             6.9
      Q4...    |                7.2                     7.0             6.6

2003: Q1...    |                7.0                     6.9             6.4
      Q2...    |                6.9                     6.8             6.3
___________________________________________________________________________
   1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production
expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry).
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit
conditions at commercial banks.

39
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Amy Wilson, International Education Programs Service, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room 6000, Washington, DC 20006-8521.                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 502-7700 or by                         *e-mail: amy.wilson@ed.gov.*

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339. 

## VIII. Other Information 

*Alternative Format:*                         Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an alternative format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         in section VII in this notice.                     

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister.*

To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC  area at (202) 512-1530. 

# Note:

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register**                            . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.*

Dated: September 19, 2008. 

Cheryl A. Oldham, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.

 [FR Doc. E8-22421 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, October 17, 2008, 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 11, 2008, 73 FR 0177.                 

This meeting will be held October 22, 2008 instead of October 17, 2008. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: September 18, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-22604 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Monnerville Rene, Jr.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-72-SM

Portsmouth Police Department

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 7, Motion of Appeal

Ruling: Denied as prematurely filed. Judgment was entered

on June 6, 2005. Accordingly, plaintiff must, if he wishes to

appeal, file a notice of appeal within the time allowed,

following June 6, 2005 (i.e., 30 days).

Entered by: Steven J. McAuliffe, Chief Judge

Date: June 6, 2005

cc: Monnerville Rene, Jr.

Case 1:05-cv-00072-SM Document 11 Filed 06/06/05 Page 1 of 1
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 5.0 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 

1992: Q4... 100 12.00 7.00 20.00 16.00 22.00 16.00 7.00 1.00 * * * * * * 

1993: Q4... 100 8.00 8.00 26.00 16.00 20.00 18.00 3.00 2.00 * * * * * * 

1994: Q4... 100 * 3.00 15.00 27.00 23.00 20.00 6.00 6.00 * * * * * * 

1995: Q4... 100 * .01 10.00 12.00 11.00 30.00 25.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 .01 * .01 * 

1996: Q4... 100 * .01 19.00 8.00 27.00 25.00 16.00 4.00 1.00 .01 * .01 .01 * 

1997: Q4... 100 * .01 5.00 6.00 34.00 31.00 16.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

1998: Q4... 100 .01 .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 * * * 

1999: Q4... 100 .01 .01 3.00 9.00 30.00 36.00 17.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 

2000: Q4... 100 * .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

2001: Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 

2002: Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 

2003: Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 

2000: Q2... 100 .01 .01 .01 4.00 19.00 36.00 27.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

 Q3... 100 .01 .01 1.00 1.00 16.00 30.00 28.00 19.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 

 Q4... 100 * .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 

 Q2... 100 .01 3.00 8.00 29.00 31.00 22.00 5.00 2.00 .39 .07 .03 .01 * * 

 Q3... 100 1.10 9.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 12.00 3.00 1.00 .26 .01 * * * * 

 Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 

2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 

 Q2... 100 23.24 22.45 17.77 22.77 10.15 2.75 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 

 Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * * 

 Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 

2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * * 

 Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * * 

 Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * * 

 Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 

 Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1992...... 71.7 78.5 63.5 66.3 47.8 75.3 57.3 59.1 61.2 78.6 1993...... 76.7 84.6 70.0 70.3 48.2 78.1 60.1 61.0 64.5 83.9 1994...... 75.1 82.9 74.3 72.3 51.6 75.7 58.6 59.8 70.4 80.2 1995...... 73.8 83.9 75.9 73.0 53.1 72.2 61.7 63.9 73.6 76.7 1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2000: Q4... 66.5 66.8 56.2 62.8 51.0 81.6 51.6 53.2 65.7 73.1 2001: Q1... 67.7 64.7 73.7 73.4 50.8 63.9 60.0 60.4 66.4 70.4  Q2... 76.1 77.5 56.8 73.8 79.0 85.1 57.3 57.4 69.0 86.2  Q3... 76.5 72.5 72.6 75.5 54.9 86.9 58.0 63.5 70.7 86.6  Q4... 78.1 74.2 63.6 78.3 38.0 88.5 60.5 63.3 72.2 84.4 2002: Q1... 72.3 62.1 64.1 69.7 57.9 88.1 64.2 57.5 64.4 79.5  Q2... 75.1 56.2 72.9 74.5 52.8 89.1 69.6 67.6 72.9 79.3  Q3... 72.2 53.6 57.8 78.2 75.1 67.9 68.5 68.7 68.5 74.8  Q4... 81.4 78.1 65.4 81.8 37.9 93.5 67.6 62.8 68.0 92.2 2003: Q1... 74.7 64.0 79.5 75.4 61.7 86.0 68.2 67.5 63.7 80.8  Q2... 69.2 53.9 63.8 67.1 74.0 84.0 66.7 62.8 54.8 79.9  Q3... 78.2 74.9 41.0 81.0 78.2 88.8 69.7 64.4 73.6 84.1  Q4... 74.9 75.5 53.0 75.3 67.4 87.1 66.0 65.6 61.6 83.4 2004: Q1... 69.4 65.2 62.7 66.8 55.1 86.3 64.5 66.2 61.9 72.3  Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jammadriteal Dunn

v. Civil No. 08-cv-178-PB

Warden, Northern New Hampshire

 Correctional Facility

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated June 24, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

July 18, 2008 _________________________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Jammadriteal Dunn, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00178-PB Document 7 Filed 07/18/08 Page 1 of 1
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1991: Q1... 49.5 17.5 32.0 -1.3 1.5 -2.8 7.4 4.3 9.1

 Q2... 52.6 18.1 34.5 6.2 3.4 7.7 7.2 5.5 8.1

 Q3... 53.9 18.3 35.6 2.5 1.4 3.1 6.6 5.8 7.1

 Q4... 53.0 18.4 34.6 -1.6 .6 -2.7 5.7 7.0 5.1

1992: Q1... 51.9 18.9 33.0 -2.1 2.7 -4.6 4.9 8.2 3.1

 Q2... 55.1 19.5 35.6 6.2 3.3 7.8 4.9 8.1 3.2

 Q3... 56.2 19.9 36.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 4.2 8.6 1.9

 Q4... 54.5 19.9 34.7 -2.9 -.2 -4.4 2.9 7.8 .2

1993: Q1... 52.8 20.0 32.8 -3.2 .5 -5.3 1.7 5.6 -.5

 Q2... 56.0 20.6 35.4 6.0 3.1 7.8 1.6 5.4 -.6

 Q3... 58.0 20.8 37.1 3.5 1.2 4.9 3.2 4.7 2.4

 Q4... 57.7 20.9 36.8 -.5 .1 -.8 5.8 5.0 6.2

1994: Q1... 56.8 21.2 35.5 -1.5 1.8 -3.4 7.6 6.4 8.3

 Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21