alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13 - 1 9 - 00 544 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JAMES LAWRENCE WOMACK , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the County Court of Matagorda County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justice s Longoria and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam Appellant ’ s brief was originally due on February 2 0 , 2020

. The Court granted one motion to extend the deadline to file a brief, and the due date was March 23 , 2020. On March 25 , 2020 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant ’ s counsel that the brief had not been fi led and requested a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days.2 Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an appellate brief in this
matter. Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following :(1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether app ellant's counsel should be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court

- appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to
court

- appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall b e included in an order appointing counsel. The trial court shall cause its finding s and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial cour t shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the da te of this order.3 It is so ORDERED. PER CURIAM
Do not publish

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)

. Delivered and filed the 24th day of April, 2020.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based onmy knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells FargoBank, N.A. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MATTHEW TIMOTHY, 

Defendant. 

4:23CR3059 

ORDER 

 

 The defendant filed a Motion to Suppress and Request for Hearing (Filing No. 42). 

Subsequently, the government filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

response (Filing No. 47). Upon the showing set forth in the motion and good cause shown, 

the undersigned grants the government’s motion as no prejudice will arise if the 

government’s response deadline is extended. (Filing No. 47). Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED: 

1. On or before June 26, 2024, the government shall file its brief in opposition to 

the defendant’s motion. 

2. On or before July 2, 2024, the parties shall meet and confer to resolve any 

issues not requiring an evidentiary hearing, agree upon any factual stipulations 

to be presented to the court, and discuss proposed exhibits and witnesses. 

3. On or before July 9, 2024, the parties shall deliver to the undersigned’s 

chambers via email to deluca@ned.uscourts.gov or hand delivery their 

proposed witness list(s), exhibit list(s), and copies of all exhibits. 

4. A telephone status conference to discuss prehearing matters and the 

scheduling of an evidentiary hearing will be held before the undersigned 

magistrate judge on July 16, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. Conferencing instructions will 

be provided under a separate order. 

 Dated this 11th day of June, 2024. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca 

United States Magistrate Judge 

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-JMD Doc # 48 Filed: 06/11/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 104
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANADA22-0144STATEOFMONTANA,FED072':3PlaintiffandAppellee,v.ROBERTL.WITHEROW,DefendantandAppellant.lgown.dc,.;L.pf-errieCourtStateofMontanaORDEROnAugust30,2022,thisCourtenteredanorderremandingthismattertotheDistrictCourttomakeappropriatefindingsoffactandconclusionsoflawregardingDefendant'sRobertL.Witherow'sconstitutionalspeedy-trialclaim,whichhadbeendeniedwithoutawrittenorder.Westatedthat,uponentryoftheDistrictCourt'sorder,Witherowwouldhave30daystofileasupplementalappellant'sbrief,andappellatebriefingwouldcontinuethereafterinaccordancewiththeRulesofAppellateProcedure.However,uponremandandconsideration,theDistrictCourt"reluctantlyconcludedthatdismissalofthemisdemeanorchargeagainstMr.Witherowisjustified"andgrantedhismotiontodismiss.TheDistrictCourt'sorderwasenteredJanuary11,2023,andwasprovidedtothisCourtonFebruary1.Laterthatday,theClerkofthisCourtenteredanoticethat,inaccordancewithourorder,Witherowhad30daystofilehissupplementalappellatebriefing.However,WitherowhasnowprevailedintheDistrictCourt.Further,theonlyissueheraisedinthisappealwasthespeedy-trialissue.Thus,thereisnoneedfortheappealtocontinue.Wethusdeemitappropriatetodismisstheappealwithoutprejudicetoeitherpartyfilinganotherappealiftheydeemitnecessary.Therefore,ITISORDEREDthattheappealisDISMISSEDWITHOUTPREJUDICE.02/07/2023Case Number: DA 22-0144TheClerkofthisCourtisdirectedtomailcopieshereoftocounselofrecordfortheparties,andtotheDistrictCourt.DATEDthisdayofFebruary,2023.2ChiefJusticeJustices
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1992...... 2.69 .35 .25 1.67 .18 .24 1.67 .54 .37 .11 1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2000: Q3... 1.86 .09 .15 1.29 .12 .20 1.10 .43 .26 .08  Q4... 1.59 .14 .19 .96 .11 .19 .90 .35 .26 .08 2001: Q1... 1.63 .12 .17 .97 .14 .23 .84 .37 .30 .11  Q2... 2.16 .13 .19 1.34 .16 .34 1.23 .49 .32 .12  Q3... 1.66 .09 .13 1.09 .12 .23 1.00 .36 .23 .08  Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1991...... 47 1 5 29 12 .268 .004 .027 .157 .067

1992...... 44 7 11 16 10 .232 .038 .058 .079 .049

1993...... 24 2 4 7 11 .121 .010 .018 .035 .054

1994...... 10 1 1 3 6 .048 .003 .003 .013 .026

1995...... 12 0 3 6 4 .055 -.001 .011 .027 .016

1996...... 7 0 1 2 4 .031 .000 .003 .009 .017

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... n.a. 8 6 5 n.a. n.a. .022 .017 .014 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
#### SOUTHERN AMUSEMENT CO. v. CITY OF JENNINGS et al.

No. 1332.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1934.

E. R. Kaufman, of Lake Charles, and Jno. B. Fournet and Jno. T. Hood, Jr., both of Jennings, for appellant.

E. D. Miller, of Jennings, for appellees.

LE BLANC, Judge.'

The two questions involved in this ease were certified by this court to the Honorable Supreme Court of Louisiana, with a request for instructions how to decide them.

*725The Supreme Court assigning reasons in an opinion, 157 So. 720, a copy of which is filed in this record,' answered one of the questions certified by us and found it unnecessary to answer the other, and instructed this court to render judgment affirming the judgment of the district court.

Complying with those instructions we now enter the following decree:

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Exhibit 34.10

 

|  |   |  |
|--|--------|--|

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To CWCapital Asset Management LLC

We have examined management of CWCapital Asset Management LLC ("CWCAM")'s assertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")'s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. CWCAM's management is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about CWCAM's compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.

Management has determined that the criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(B), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by CWCAM, as a special servicer, with respect to CWCAM's Platform. The commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are those specified in Appendix B in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether management's assertion about compliance with the specified requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether management's assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of management's assertion, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on CWCAM's compliance with the specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. SEC's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/CohnReznick LLP

Bethesda, Maryland February 25, 2020

(Except for Assertion 3 on the Management’s Assertion on

Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria for which is dated

March 23, 2020)
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
                                  Estimated volume                  Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                                (percent)
                      ________________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1       Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
1992......    |          82      14       20       29       18      .237      .039      .062     .083      .050
1993......    |          54       7       16        5       26      .155      .020      .049     .014      .069
1994......    |          69      10       11       15       33      .187      .026      .032     .037      .082
1995......    |          51      -2       14       13       25      .131     -.004      .039     .032      .061
1996......    |          95      16       27       24       30      .240      .039      .070     .058      .071
1997......    |          93       6       19       19       50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4       15       24       45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18       37       35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11       17       34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67       53      140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40       50       58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |        n.a.      34     n.a.     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .074      n.a.     n.a.      n.a.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-56-01/03/04-SM

Raymond Cole, Joshua Benoit

and Garret Morin

O R D E R

Defendant Raymond Cole has filed a motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial (document no. 38). Trial has been rescheduled for the

January 2009 trial period. Defendant Cole shall file a waiver of speedy trial

rights not later than October 9, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, the

continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: January 9, 2009 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 21, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00056-SM Document 39 Filed 09/29/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

September 29, 2008 

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Charles Keefe, Esq.

Paul Twomey, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00056-SM Document 39 Filed 09/29/08 Page 2 of 2
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 551,969 131,328 83,643 162,190 93,096 n.a. 37,673 Number of loans 13,615 2,220 2,414 4,715 1,178 n.a. 791 Weighted average maturity (months)1 29.64 15.45 10.40 49.99 13.88 n.a. 66.83 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 16.21 7.30 n.a. 34.33 33.46 2.46 1.00 

Weighted average risk rating3 3.00 4.00 n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.80 12.89 

Weighted average interest rate4 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 n.a. .01 

 Standard error5 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01  25th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock .01 .01 n.a. .01 .01 .01 .01  Other livestock .01 .01 n.a. .01 .01 .01 .01  Other current operating expenses7 .01 .01 n.a. .01 .01 .01 .01 

 Farm machinery and equipment .01 .01 n.a. .01 .01 .01 .01  Farm real estate .01 .01 n.a. .01 .01 .01 .01  Other8 .01 .01 n.a. .01 .01 51.60 53.23 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 59.83 47.31 n.a. 42.57 21.63 48.33 41.26  Under commitment 41.54 56.87 n.a. 45.91 47.03 8.38 1.79  Callable 9.66 .87 n.a. 2.41 40.07 .58 2.10  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.96 1.15 n.a. 34.02 6.88 10.00 .16  Other livestock 12.22 1.23 n.a. 8.94 13.47 63.49 85.23  Other current operating expenses7 51.31 92.11 n.a. 28.29 45.04 5.06 4.90 

 Farm machinery and equipment 10.15 1.43 n.a. 1.31 6.53 8.90 5.02  Farm real estate 12.36 .20 n.a. 22.21 15.52 4.18 2.90  Other8 5.00 3.88 n.a. 5.23 12.58 13.84 7.38 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 19.10 19.72 n.a. 61.45 31.59 67.80 46.28  Other 79.65 79.84 n.a. 37.39 64.18 n.a. n.a Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                      70,133,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,511,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,590
<INVENTORY>                                  8,345,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            90,689,494
<PP&E>                                       9,311,384
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,126,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,555,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,673,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    63,466,310
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,161,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,555,629
<SALES>                                     81,950,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,950,958
<CGS>                                       48,949,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,272,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,442,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,553,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,888,868
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,888,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
        

</TABLE>