alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoJax Oil and Gas Corporation, a Virginia corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wm. Barrett Wellman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: June 13, 2022By/s/Wm. Barrett WellmanName:Wm. Barrett WellmanTitle:Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Laurie Prince aka Laurie Scoville

v. Civil No. 06-cv-405-PB

Metropolitan Life Insurance

O R D E R

The plaintiff has not responded to my order dated August 28, 2007, accordingly, this case

is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

November 19, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00405-PB Document 13 Filed 11/19/07 Page 1 of 1
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1992...... 7.8 8.2 8.6 8.8 9.3 6.3 9.7 9.3 8.8 7.1 1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2001: Q1... 9.1 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.2 8.3 10.1 9.8 9.6 8.7  Q2... 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.1 7.8 9.2 8.9 8.6 7.9  Q3... 7.7 7.8 7.5 8.1 8.2 6.9 8.9 8.5 8.0 7.1  Q4... 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.8 7.4 5.3 7.9 7.4 6.8 5.5 2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7  Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6  Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9  Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2  Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6  Q4... 5.0 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.6 4.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 4.2 2004: Q1... 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.0  Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Q3... 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.0 6.6 6.5 5.9 5.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1991...... 1.1 .4 .7 .1 .5 3.2 1.3 1.9 .3 1.6

1992...... 1.0 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.8 1.0 1.8 .3 1.5

1993...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.2 .8 1.4 .2 1.2

1994...... .8 .3 .4 .1 .3 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1995...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

1995: Q2... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.3 .9 1.3 .4 1.0

 Q3... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q4... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996: Q1... 1.3 .7 .6 .2 .4 3.4 1.8 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q2... 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .3 .6 .2 .4 2.3 .8 1.5 .4 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997: Q1... 1.3 .7 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.7 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.0 .7 1.3 .3 .9

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998: Q1... 1.3 .8 .6 .2 .4 3.2 1.8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q2... 1.1 .5 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.1 1.3 .5 .8

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.1 .8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999: Q1... 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .4 3.7 2.1 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.3 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .5 2.2 .8 1.4 .4 1.0

 Q4... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000: Q1... 1.3 .6 .6 .2 .5 3.0 1.5 1.5 .4 1.1

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.2 .9 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 1.9 .7 1.2 .2 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001: Q1... 1.7 1.0 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.2 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q2... 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .4 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-219-PB

Derrick Kerrins

SEALED ORDER

The defendant has moved to continue the January 9, 2007 

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete discovery and prepare a defense. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 9, 2007 to March 6, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00219-PB Document 13 Filed 12/20/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The December 20, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

to February 21, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 20, 2006

cc: Michael Iacopino, Esq.

Robert Veiga, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00219-PB Document 13 Filed 12/20/06 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 192

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase

in income taxes on Social Security benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. STUMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the 1993 increase in income taxes on Social Security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1993 INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL

4 SECURITY BENEFITS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social se7 curity and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended

8 by adding at the end the following new sentence:

9 ‘‘This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year

10 beginning after December 31, 2001.’’
2

•HR 192 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such

3 Code is amended by striking ‘‘85 percent’’ in sub4 paragraph (A) and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.

5 (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1)

6 of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Public

7 Law 98–21) is amended—

8 (i) by striking ‘‘(A) There’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘There’’;

10 (ii) by striking ‘‘(i)’’ immediately following

11 ‘‘amounts equivalent to’’; and

12 (iii) by striking ‘‘, less (ii)’’ and all that

13 follows and inserting a period.

14 (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act

15 is amended by striking subparagraph (B).

16 (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act

17 is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and by re18 designating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).

19 (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such

20 Act is amended in the first sentence by striking

21 ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’.

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

24 December 31, 2001.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barry R.  Steinberg,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of  Manchester
Technologies,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
     (the  "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 16, 2003

/S/      Barry R. Steinberg
Barry R. Steinberg
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2007...... 13.3 9.9 15.1 9.7 21.4 18.5 9.8 11.8 11.6 14.3 2004: Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Q4... 13.1 10.6 11.6 8.6 15.0 21.7 8.3 10.0 12.4 14.0 2008: Q1... 13.9 10.7 15.9 9.7 38.0 20.2 9.1 12.2 13.6 14.3  Q2... 14.8 8.2 8.9 9.7 24.4 25.7 10.7 11.7 11.9 16.3  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-118-PB

Christopher Francoeur

O R D E R

The defendant has moved, through counsel, to continue the

trial scheduled for November 4, 2008, citing the need for

additional time to complete and prepare a defense or engage in

plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from November 4, 2008 to January 6, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:08-cr-00118-PB Document 11 Filed 10/20/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 20, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued

to December 22, 2008 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 20, 2008

cc: Jessica Brown, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00118-PB Document 11 Filed 10/20/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gerard Bean

v. Civil No. 07-cv-328-JL

Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden

ORDER PROHIBITING REMOTE ELECTRONIC ACCESS

Attachments N, H and P to plaintiff's Notice of Appeal in the above-captioned case contain

one or more personal identifiers listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Making this information available 

over the Internet may result in personal or financial harm to the person whose personal information 

is contained in the Attachments N, H and P. Therefore, because good cause exists to prohibit a 

nonparty from obtaining remote electronic access to the Attachments N, H and P to plaintiff's 

Notice of Appeal, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

5.2(e)(2).

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Landya B. McCafferty

Landya B. McCafferty

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: June 7, 2012

cc: Gerard Bean, pro se

Elizabeth Woodcock, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00328-JL Document 133 Filed 06/07/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.01 - Certification of CEO and CF0 Section 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DataMEG Corp.(the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Benson, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
April 15, 2003


By: /s/ Andrew Benson
----------------------------
Andrew Benson
President and Sole Director
(principal executive officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8720-6]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is giving notice of a public meeting to discuss remaining “long-term” issues with the Lead and Copper Rule. This meeting is open to the public and will provide a forum for public discussion of potential issues that may be appropriate for additional action.

# DATES:

                        The public meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 14 and Wednesday, October 15, 2008. Attendees should register for the meeting by contacting Junie Percy of IntelliTech Systems, Inc. at (937) 427-4148 (x210) or by e-mail to                         *junie.percy@itsysteminc.com*                         no later than October 6, 2008.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at The Carnegie Institution for Science, 1530 P Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For administrative meeting information, contact Junie Percy of IntelliTech Systems, Inc. at (937) 427-4148 (x210) or by e-mail to                         *junie.percy@itsysteminc.com*. For Technical information, contact Rebecca Allen, Office of Water, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management Division, Targeting and Analysis Branch, U.S. EPA, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 at (202) 564-4689 or by e-mail at                         *allen.rebeccak@epa.gov*.                    

## Special Accommodations

                        For information on access or accommodations for individuals with disabilities, please contact Rebecca Allen at (202) 564-4689 or by e-mail at                         *allen.rebeccak@epa.gov*. Please allow at least 10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA time to process your request.                    

Dated: September 19, 2008.

Nanci E. Gelb,

Acting Office Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.

[FR Doc. E8-22554 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2002: Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF also have been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1997 1998 1999

2000 2001

Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June Julyp

1 Deposits .............................. 457 167 71 215 199 196 70 101 86 102 84

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 620,885 607,574 632,482 594,094 594,694 603,906 609,440 585,710 583,655 586,607 578,573

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 10,763 10,343 9,933 9,451 9,397 9,343 9,289 9,235 9,154 9,100 9,100

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.