alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, November 4-8, 2002Percent except as noted

Loan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rat

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,107,492 114,457 226,275 277,455 249,121 59,903 91,2

Number of loans 33,345 3,405 5,603 11,157 6,866 1,094 97

Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.11 14.27 49.38 10.99 13.13 5.43 21.5

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 5.13 2.85 10.39 2.21 1.93 .77 1.0

Weighted average risk rating3 2.91 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 5.56 6.77 5.39 5.35 5.14 5.42 5.0

 Standard error5 .33 .29 .48 .42 .21 .46 .

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 7.19 7.50 7.38 7.00 5.64 5.90 5.

 25th percentile 4.21 6.75 3.30 3.56 4.33 4.59 4.2

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.68 6.74 4.97 6.69 5.22 4.51 5.7

 Other livestock 5.45 5.11 7.12 4.71 4.54 4.22 6.7

 Other current operating expenses7 6.15 6.98 6.54 5.76 5.50 6.06 5.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.11 9.10 6.60 6.85 6.27 n.a. 8.

 Farm real estate 5.87 5.93 6.07 5.26 5.42 7.50 4.

 Other8 4.29 6.23 3.57 4.13 4.85 4.48 4.0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 80.33 76.13 77.74 81.68 94.66 92.42 93.

 Under commitment 79.76 80.61 76.91 82.93 90.54 99.74 81.

 Callable 12.16 15.65 11.07 12.50 12.10 .95 1.

 Subject to prepayment penalty 2.67 .34 .49 7.14 1.40 4.47 2.

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 12.20 5.36 18.10 9.34 11.56 3.12 18.

 Other livestock 10.37 4.98 10.54 12.07 12.98 6.65 2.2

 Other current operating expenses7 42.73 76.54 26.12 48.79 38.51 60.47 27.

 Farm machinery and equipment 2.58 .64 2.44 3.65 .99 7.77 5.

 Farm real estate 6.79 8.29 13.70 1.64 4.37 .01 2.9

 Other8 25.33 4.19 29.10 24.52 31.59 29.76 44.0

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 10.24 6.98 15.04 5.36 8.56 1.92 18.

 Other 82.61 92.11 82.59 83.83 79.58 92.01 74.9

 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  as of  January  31,  2000 and is
qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such   consolidated   financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                                             28,000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   7,468,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      865,000
<INVENTORY>                                                     7,243,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               14,889,000
<PP&E>                                                            230,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 22,992,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           9,384,000
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                           35,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   22,992,000
<SALES>                                                         5,284,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                5,284,000
<CGS>                                                           2,977,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   2,977,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                1,915,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                125,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   267,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      116,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               151,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      151,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0.05


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00189

- CV

Maryann CASTRO and Manuel Castro,

Appellants

v.

MLB SUB I, LLC

, Appellee

From the County Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4343

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is MOOT. Appellants are indigent;

no costs are ta xed in this appeal.

SIGNED August 17, 2016.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-552-802]


Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 
Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of the New Shipper 
Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 4, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emeka Chukwudebe, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0219.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 4, 2008 the Department published a notice of initiation of 
the new shipper review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam covering the period February 1, 2007 
through January 1, 2008. See Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 
73 FR 18510 (April 4, 2008). The preliminary results of this new 
shipper review are currently due no later than September 22, 2008.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
``Act''), provides that the Department will issue the preliminary 
results of a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order within 180 
days after the day on which the review was initiated. See also 19 CFR 
351.214 (i)(1). The Act further provides that the Department may extend 
that 180-day period to 300 days if it determines that the case is 
extraordinarily complicated. See 19 CFR 351.214 (i)(2).

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results

    The Department determines that this new shipper review involves 
extraordinarily complicated methodological issues regarding the use of 
an intermediate input methodology, potential affiliation issues, the 
examination of importer information and the evaluation of the bona fide 
nature of company sales. Therefore, in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the Department is 
extending the time limit for these preliminary results by 120 days, 
until no later than January 20, 2009. The final result continues to be 
due 90 days after the publication of the preliminary result.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22289 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,786
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   330
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    537,500
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,235
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,276
<LOANS>                                        814,295<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,509,722
<DEPOSITS>                                     650,090
<SHORT-TERM>                                   518,803
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             27,910
<LONG-TERM>                                    211,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,509,722
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,915
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,016
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,451
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                68,382
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,761
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,748
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,634
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,448
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,448
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,825
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.36
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,063
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   312
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,016
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      822
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,111
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,111
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,535
<FN>
<F1>LOANS HELD TO MATURITY
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James Sloman,

v. Civil No. 06-cv-00377-JL

Presstek, Inc., et al.

 O R D E R

The joint motion to continue the class certification hearing 

(document no. 82) is GRANTED. 

Due to administrative anomalies caused by the parties’

requests to stay the proceeding and for this continuance, the

motion for class certification (document no. 49) is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE to being reinstated upon the plaintiff’s

request.

If the September 24, 2008 mediation does not result in a

resolution of this case, and the plaintiff wishes to reinstate

the motion for class certification, the plaintiff need only file

a Notice of Reinstatement. At that time, a hearing on the

reinstated motion to certify will be scheduled.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 18, 2008

Case 1:06-cv-00377-JL Document 83 Filed 09/18/08 Page 1 of 2
2

cc: Theodore M. Hess-Mahan, Esq.

Mark L. Mallory, Esq.

Thomas G. Shapiro, Esq.

Matthew L. Tuccillo, Esq.

Christine Friedman, Esq.

Douglas P. Baumstein, Esq.

Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.

Glenn M. Kurtz, Esq.

Gregory M. Starner, Esq.

John Richard Baraniak, Esq.

R. J. Cinquegrana, Esq.

Alessandro Martuscelli, Esq.

Nikki J. Fisher, Esq.

Jason D. Frank, Esq.

Jordan D. Hershman, Esq.

Darrell John Chichester, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00377-JL Document 83 Filed 09/18/08 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Woolridge, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 872]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about March 23, 2004, which denied defendant’s CEL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment of the same court (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered February 18, 1998, *442convicting him, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion without a hearing. Defendant offered no evidence that a witness at his trial received any promise or understanding regarding lenient treatment in his unrelated Bronx case. Both the witness and the prosecutor denied the existence of any such understanding or promise, and defendant’s speculative and unsupported assertions did not warrant a hearing *(see People v Matthews,*306 AD2d 134, 135 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 622 [2003]; *People v Ross,*288 AD2d 138, 139 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 655 [2002]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Tai Tuan NgUen and

Quoc My Tra

Case No . 07-cr-01/03-SM

ORDER

Defendant Nguyen's motion to continue the final pretrial conference an d

trial is granted (document 29) . Trial has been rescheduled for the December

2007 trial period. Defendant Nguyen shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than August 23, 2007 . On the filing of such waivers, this continuance

shall be effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant s in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : November 20, 2007 at 3 :30 p .m.

Jury Selection : December 4, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00011-SM Document 31 Filed 08/21/07 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

August 21, 2007

cc : James D. Gleason, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq.

Jennifer C . Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:07-cr-00011-SM Document 31 Filed 08/21/07 Page 2 of 2
*Release Date: September 30, 2003*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 9.3     | 9.1                    | 8.5                                |
| 8.8     | 8.7                    | 8.1                                |
| 7.9     | 7.7                    | 7.2                                |
| 7.4     | 7.5                    | 7.0                                |
| 7.2     | 7.2                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.3                                |
| 6.5     | 6.4                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.3     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 7.7     | 7.6                    | 7.1                                |
| 7.5     | 7.4                    | 6.9                                |
| 7.2     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.0     | 6.9                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.9     | 6.8                    | 6.3                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22554]



[[Page 55511]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8720-6]


Lead and Copper Rule Remaining Long-Term Issues Stakeholder 
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is giving notice of a 
public meeting to discuss remaining ``long-term'' issues with the Lead 
and Copper Rule. This meeting is open to the public and will provide a 
forum for public discussion of potential issues that may be appropriate 
for additional action.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 14 and 
Wednesday, October 15, 2008. Attendees should register for the meeting 
by contacting Junie Percy of IntelliTech Systems, Inc. at (937) 427-
4148 (x210) or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8798838488c39d889f8e94ad84999e949e99888084838ec38e8280"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="69031c07000c47190c1b0a1029001d1a101a1d0c0400070a470a0604">[email protected]</span></a> no later than 
October 6, 2008.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Carnegie Institution for 
Science, 1530 P Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For administrative meeting 
information, contact Junie Percy of IntelliTech Systems, Inc. at (937) 
427-4148 (x210) or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90fae5fef9f5bee0f5e2f3e9d0f9e4e3e9e3e4f5fdf9fef3bef3fffd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6ccd3c8cfc388d6c3d4c5dfe6cfd2d5dfd5d2c3cbcfc8c588c5c9cb">[email protected]</span></a>. For 
Technical information, contact Rebecca Allen, Office of Water, Office 
of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management 
Division, Targeting and Analysis Branch, U.S. EPA, 1201 Constitution 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 at (202) 564-4689 or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b1bcbcb5befea2b5b2b5b3b3b1bb90b5a0b1feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5c51515853134f585f585e5e5c567d584d5c135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

Special Accommodations

    For information on access or accommodations for individuals with 
disabilities, please contact Rebecca Allen at (202) 564-4689 or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d6b7babab3b8f8a4b3b4b3b5b5b7bd96b3a6b7f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e7868b8b8289c9958285828484868ca7829786c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>. Please allow at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting to give EPA time to process your request.

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Nanci E. Gelb,
Acting Office Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. E8-22554 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES ) 

AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civ. No. 07-39-SM 

 ) 

ERIC JAEGER and ) 

JERRY A. SHANAHAN, ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

DEFENDANT JERRY SHANAHAN’S ASSENTED-TO MOTION 

 FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 

 OF HIS CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 Jerry Shanahan moves this Court pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) for leave to file 

his reply memorandum in support of his cross motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 280). 

 In support of said motion, Mr. Shanahan states the following: 

1. Mr. Shanahan seeks leave to file a reply memorandum to the SEC’s Response 

to his summary judgment motion. (Dkt. Nos. 288-290). Pursuant to Local 

Rule 7(e)(1), Mr. Shanahan provided timely notice to the Court and the SEC 

of his intent to file this motion. (Dkt. 293). 

2. The proposed reply memorandum (attached hereto as Exhibit 1) is twenty-four 

pages long. The reply memorandum is necessary to respond to the factual and 

legal arguments raised in the SEC’s voluminous submissions opposing Mr. 

Shanahan’s summary judgment motion. 

3. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the SEC has concurred in this motion. 

Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 295 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 2
4. Due to the nature of this motion, no memorandum of law is submitted 

herewith. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant Jerry Shanahan moves for leave to file his Reply 

Memorandum in Support of His Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 JERRY SHANAHAN, 

 By his attorneys, 

 /s/ Andrew Good________________

 Andrew Good 

 /s/ Philip G. Cormier_____________

 Philip G. Cormier 

 

Good & Cormier 

 83 Atlantic Avenue 

 Boston, MA 02110 

 (617) 523-5933 

DATED: February 1, 2012 

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion was hereby served, via the 

ECF system, upon the following: 

Nancy Gegenheimer gegenheimern@sec.gov

Leslie J. Hughes hugheslj@sec.gov 

Jeffrey S. Lyons lyonsj@sec.gov

Jeffrey B. Rudman jeffrey.rudman@wilmerhale.com

James A. Scoggins, II scogginsj@sec.gov 

Jonathan A. Shapiro jonathan.shapiro@wilmerhale.com

DATED: February 1, 2012 

 /s/ Andrew Good________________

Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 295 Filed 02/01/12 Page 2 of 2
exv10w4w2



 





Exhibit 10.4.2




SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION

INCENTIVE PLAN




     Pursuant to the approval by the Board of Directors of MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation (the “Company”) and the Company’s shareholders at the Company’s
2002 Annual Meeting, the MeriStar Hospitality Corporation Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) is amended, effective June 9, 2003, by deleting the language contained
in Section 7.1 in its entirety and by replacing such language with the
following text:




     Award. In accordance with the provisions of Article IV, the
Committee will designate each individual to whom a Stock Award is
to be made and will specify the number of shares of Common Stock
covered by such awards; provided, however, that no individual may
receive Stock Awards with respect to more than 250,000 shares of
Common Stock in any calendar year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MeriStar Hospitality Corporation has caused this
amendment to the Plan to be duly executed in its corporate name this 9th day of
June, 2003.



MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION




 





/s/ Jerome J. Kraisinger








Jerome J. Kraisinger

Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary