alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1747

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking a child hostage

in order to evade arrest.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking

a child hostage in order to evade arrest.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHILD HOSTAGE-TAKING TO EVADE ARREST

4 OR OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new section:
2

•HR 1747 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1205. Child hostage-taking to evade arrest or ob2 struct justice

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever uses force or threatens

4 to use force against any officer or agency of the Federal

5 Government, and seizes or detains, or continues to detain,

6 a child in order to—

7 ‘‘(1) obstruct, resist, or oppose any officer of

8 the United States, or other person duly authorized,

9 in serving, or attempting to serve or execute, any

10 legal or judicial writ, process, or warrant of any

11 court of the United States; or

12 ‘‘(2) compel any department or agency of the

13 Federal Government to do or to abstain from doing

14 any act;

15 or attempts to do so, shall be punished in accordance with

16 subsection (b).

17 ‘‘(b) SENTENCING.—Any person who violates sub18 section (a)—

19 ‘‘(1) shall be imprisoned not less than 10 years

20 and not more than 25 years;

21 ‘‘(2) if injury results to the child as a result of

22 the violation, shall be imprisoned not less than 20

23 years and not more than 35 years; and

24 ‘‘(3) if death results to the child as a result of

25 the violation, shall be subject to the penalty of death

26 or be imprisoned for life.
3

•HR 1747 IH

1 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

2 term ‘child’ means an individual who has not attained the

3 age of 18 years.’’.

4 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

5 for chapter 55 of title 18, United States Code, is amended

6 by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘1205. Child hostage-taking to evade arrest or obstruct justice.’’.

Æ
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: August 25, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 08-cr-39-05-PB

Gillian Barrett

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. 

In April and May of 2008, Ms. Barrett violated her bail with

no action requested. On January 22, 2009, she was arrested for

possession of oxycodone and had alcohol on her breath. The

arrest was at a time after her curfew. Given the number of failed

opportunities to comply with conditions I find that the defendant

is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of

conditions. The conditions of release are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

Case 1:08-cr-00039-PB Document 103 Filed 02/03/09 Page 1 of 2
2

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: February 3, 2009 

cc: Stanley W. Norkunas, Esq.

 Debra M. Walsh, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00039-PB Document 103 Filed 02/03/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Darryl E. Bickham

v.

New Hampshire State Prison, Warden

No. 07-fp-064

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-064-PB.

SO ORDERED.

ames R. Muirhead

Date: March 9, 2007

ed States Magistrate Judge

cc: Darryl E. Bickham, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00064-PB Document 3 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 1

Bickham v. NH State Prison, Warden Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Faith Copp

v. Case No. 05-cv-214-PB

Freudenberg-NOK

General Partnership, et al.

O R D E R

It is undisputed that (1) Faith Copp’s employer, FNGP

Manufacturing General Partnership, is a partnership rather than a

corporation; (2) Freudenberg-NOK is a general partner in FNGP

Manufacturing; and (3) Freudenberg and Company is a general

partner in the Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership. Copp’s

claims against both partnerships arise from their status as

partners rather than as corporate parents or as independently

liable defendants. Under these circumstances, both defendants

are immune from suit under New Hampshire’s Worker’s Compensation

Law. See Swiezynski v. Civiello, 126 N.H. 142, 144 (1985). 

Defendants’ request for summary judgment (Doc. No. 7) is granted. 

Case 1:05-cv-00214-PB Document 22 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
-2-

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 7, 2005

cc: Matthew Lahey, Esq.

Andrew Dunn Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00214-PB Document 22 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlton Evans, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 210]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J., at first *Antommarchi*waiver; James A. Yates, J., at second *Antommarchi*waiver, jury trial and sentence), rendered February 3, 2004, convicting defendant of two counts of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 20 years on the rape convictions, concurrent with a term of 20 years on the sodomy conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to be present at sidebar conferences during jury selection *see People v Mitchell,*80 NY2d 519 [1992]). As the result of a scheduling problem that necessitated the recommencement of jury selection, two justices advised defendant of his rights under *People v Antommarchi*(80 NY2d 247 [1992]) on successive days. Each of these colloquies was thorough and complete, and the only difference between them was that the first colloquy contained an implication that the waiver was revocable, while the second contained no such implication. We reject defendant’s argument that the omission from the second colloquy of any mention of revocation rendered the waiver invalid. The two colloquies should be viewed as a whole *(cf. People v Peterson,*273 AD2d 88, 89 [2000] [waiver of right to counsel viewed in light of prior colloquies on risks of self-representation]). In any event, defendant did not have the right to rescind his *Antommarchi*waiver *(People v Williams,*92 NY2d 993 [1998]), and never sought to do so.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Emilio Encarnacion

v. Civil No. 07-cv-142-PB

USA

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $350.00 is due no later than July

15, 2007. Failure to pay the fee as ordered will result in

dismissal of the action without prejudice. In all other respects

plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 21, 2007

cc: Emilio Encarnacion, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Federal Prison Camp, Waymart, PA, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00142-PB Document 5 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 1
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 18, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen L. Bartlett

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00358-JL

Mutual Pharmaceutical

Company, Inc.

PROCEDUARL ORDER

In order to facilitate the orderly resolution of

outstanding issues as trial approaches, the following deadlines

are established:

1. Bartlett’s objection to the pending motion for

reconsideration (document # 263) is due July 30, 2010. No leave

for a reply will be granted. 

2. Mutual’s objection to Bartlett’s motion in limine

regarding causation (document # 261) is due July 26, 2010. No

leave for a reply will be granted. 

3. The parties will file Trial Briefs no later than two

calendar days before the date of the final pretrial conference,

excluding weekend days (if applicable, depending on whether and

to when the final pretrial conference is rescheduled). The Trial

Briefs shall set forth the elements of proof as to all remaining

claims and defenses1, and the party carrying the burden of

proving these elements shall set forth the evidence it will

present to satisfy them. Page limit is 25 pages. The briefs

shall not include exhibits, but may make reference to exhibits

attached to the parties’ summary judgment papers or other

filings. 

SO ORDERED.

1As far as the court is concerned, the affirmative defenses

at issue are the “comment K” defense, the “third party

culpability” defense involving the prescribing physician’s

conduct, and the culpability defense involving Bartlett’s own

conduct. Any other defenses are briefed at the defendant’s own

discretion. 

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 268 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 2
____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 21, 2010

cc: Keith M. Jensen, Esq.

Bryan Ballew, Esq.

Patrick J. O’Neal, Esq.

Christine M. Craig, Esq.

Timothy P. Beaupre, Esq.

Paul J. Cosgrove, Esq.

Joseph P. Thomas, Esq.

Jeffrey D. Geoppinger, Esq.

Linda E. Maichl, Esq.

Stephen J. Judge, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 268 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-218-01-SM

Richard Porter

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 9) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the November 2008 trial period. Defendant

shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than August 4, 2008. On the

filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective 

Case 1:07-cr-00218-SM Document 10 Filed 07/31/08 Page 1 of 2
2

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: October 24, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Jury Selection: November 4, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

July 31, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq. 

 Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00218-SM Document 10 Filed 07/31/08 Page 2 of 2
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0613 JASON DEAN FRANKS,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including February 3 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 28 2021

12/28/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0613
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-069-01-PB

Michelle Olivieri

O R D E R

On March 19, 2012, defendant was brought before the court 

for her initial appearance and preliminary hearing under Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 32.1 on one alleged violation of conditions of 

supervision, as charged in the government's petition dated March 

16, 2012 (doc. no. 41). Defendant is on release from her

conviction in 2006 for distribution of cocaine base (“crack”) in 

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)

Defendant stipulated to probable cause on the violation. I 

therefore find probable cause that defendant has violated the 

condition as charged in the petition. 

Defendant sought release under Rule 32.1(a)(6). The 

government sought detention. Under Rule 32.1(a)(6), defendant 

bears the burden of establishing by clear and convincing 

evidence that she will not flee and that she poses no danger to 
2

any other person or to the community. At the hearing, the court 

summarized its findings orally from the bench. Those oral 

findings are incorporated herein. Based on the evidence 

presented at the hearing, and for the reasons stated on the 

record, defendant failed to meet her burden of persuading the 

court that she poses no danger to any other person or to the 

community. 

In sum, the court finds that defendant did not meet her

burden to show by clear and convincing evidence that her

release, even on strict conditions, would pose no danger to any 

other person or the community. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 

the defendant be detained pending a final revocation hearing. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney 

General or his designated representative for confinement in a 

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from 

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody 

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable 

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On 

order of a court of the United States or on request of an 

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the 

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United 
3

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection 

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

 

Landya B. McCafferty

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 19, 2012

 

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

William Morse, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation
19

A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2003 Q1 survey,

region share of national

total 2.7 9.3 28.2 17.7 8.6 4.9 4.7 9.0 5.6 9.2

Sample coverage, 2003 Q1

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 18.1 5.9 20.9 14.3 19.2 14.9 9.2 9.2 13.9 57.7

Avg. loan size, 2003 Q1 survey

(thousands of dollars) 45.9 13.5 44.4 28.4 37.5 50.5 33.0 55.6 15.9 91.8

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

1997: Q1 8.8 9.5 9.5 9.3 8.0 9.9 9.5 9.5 10.1 8.7

Q2 9.4 10.1 9.2 9.5 8.3 9.9 10.2 9.7 10.0 8.7

Q3 9.3 9.8 9.6 9.9 8.5 10.1 9.9 9.7 10.5 8.7

Q4 9.2 9.5 9.3 9.8 7.5 9.8 9.4 9.4 10.1 8.8

1998: Q1 9.3 9.0 9.4 9.8 7.3 10.0 10.3 9.8 9.6 8.5

Q2 9.2 9.4 9.2 9.7 7.6 10.2 10.3 9.6 9.8 8.4

Q3 10.2 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.8 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.6 8.5

Q4 9.4 9.2 8.7 9.0 8.3 9.4 9.7 9.2 9.1 8.0

1999: Q1 8.4 8.9 8.9 9.1 8.2 9.0 9.6 9.1 9.0 7.5

Q2 9.6 9.1 8.8 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.8 9.0 8.7 8.0

Q3 10.2 8.9 8.7 9.3 8.2 8.9 10.0 8.8 9.0 8.5

Q4 9.1 9.2 8.8 9.4 8.3 8.8 9.8 9.0 9.5 8.8

2000: Q1 9.4 9.2 9.2 9.6 8.4 9.8 9.3 10.0 9.8 8.4

Q2 10.7 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.1 9.1 10.5 10.0 10.1 9.5

Q3 10.5 10.30 10.0 10.3 9.7 9.2 10.5 10.0 10.6 9.7

Q4 10.7 9.3 9.9 10.1 9.2 9.4 9.2 10.3 10.3 9.8

2001: Q1 9.3 9.1 9.4 9.7 8.4 7.8 9.5 9.0 9.8 8.8

Q2 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.8 7.4 8.1 8.3 9.2 8.6 7.9

Q3 8.3 9.8 7.9 8.2 6.3 7.6 8.7 8.8 7.8 7.2

Q4 6.9 7.9 6.3 7.0 5.2 6.3 8.7 7.6 6.1 5.2

(.23) (.78) (.38) (.29) (.36) (1.71) (.42) (.79) (.33) (.35)

2002: Q1 6.9 7.8 6.7 7.2 5.2 5.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 4.9

(.12) (.37) (.26) (.22) (.63) (1.14) (.39) (.45) (.26) (.25)

Q2 6.8 7.4 6.4 7.2 5.0 5.9 7.6 7.5 6.5 5.1

(.14) (.29) (.27) (.21) (.48) (1.03) (.23) (.34) (.36) (.26)

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.8 5.6 4.4 4.9 6.6 5.3 5.6 4.3

(.14) (.03) (.51) (.40) (.69) (.68) (.22) (.96) (.36) (.33)

Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5

(.35) (.45) (.47) (1.01) (.56) (.62) (.68) (.35) (.47) (.62)

2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.1 4.5

(.15) (.26) (.31) (.73) (.65) (.63) (.54) (.66) (.35) (.40)

Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2

(.29) (.17) (.37) (.34) (.71) (.63) (.45) (.71) (.36) (.50)

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

(.15) (.04) (.49) (.39) (.73) (.69) (.27) (.99) (.35) (.26)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is Delta

States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. They are

calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(c)

                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned, Michael J. McNally, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
        September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
        Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of November, 2002.


                                     /s/  Michael J. McNally
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Michael J. McNally
                                   Title: Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1992...... 44 7 11 16 10 .232 .038 .058 .079 .049

1993...... 24 2 4 7 11 .121 .010 .018 .035 .054

1994...... 10 1 1 3 6 .048 .003 .003 .013 .026

1995...... 12 0 3 6 4 .055 -.001 .011 .027 .016

1996...... 7 0 1 2 4 .031 .000 .003 .009 .017

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... n.a. 4 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. .010 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.