alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,305,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  636,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,942,023
<PP&E>                                      22,734,660
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,748,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,322,798
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,513,857
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,714,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,748,425
<SALES>                                      1,148,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,157,985
<CGS>                                          485,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,085,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1954

AN ACT

To extend the authorities of the Iran and Libya Sanctions

Act of 1996 until 2006, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1954 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ILSA Extension Act

3 of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO

5 LIBYA.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5(b)(2) of the Iran and

7 Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; 110

8 Stat. 1543) is amended by striking ‘‘$40,000,000’’ each

9 place it appears and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to investments made on or after

12 June 13, 2001.

13 SEC. 3. REPORTS REQUIRED.

14 Section 10 of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of

15 1996 (Public Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is

16 amended—

17 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub18 section (c); and

19 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol20 lowing:

21 ‘‘(b) REPORT ON EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIONS

22 UNDER THIS ACT.—Not earlier than 24 months, and not

23 later than 30 months, after the date of the enactment of

24 the ILSA Extension Act of 2001, the President shall

25 transmit to Congress a report that describes—
3

•HR 1954 EH

1 ‘‘(1) the extent to which actions relating to

2 trade taken pursuant to this Act—

3 ‘‘(A) have been effective in achieving the

4 objectives of section 3 and any other foreign

5 policy or national security objectives of the

6 United States with respect to Iran and Libya;

7 and

8 ‘‘(B) have affected humanitarian interests

9 in Iran and Libya, the country in which the

10 sanctioned person is located, or in other coun11 tries; and

12 ‘‘(2) the impact of actions relating to trade

13 taken pursuant to this Act on other national secu14 rity, economic, and foreign policy interests of the

15 United States, including relations with countries

16 friendly to the United States, and on the United

17 States economy.

18 The President may include in the report the President’s

19 recommendation on whether or not this Act should be ter20 minated or modified.’’.

21 SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF IRAN AND LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT OF

22 1996.

23 Section 13(b) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act

24 of 1996 (Public Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is

25 amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years’’.
4

•HR 1954 EH

1 SEC. 5. REVISED DEFINITION OF INVESTMENT.

2 Section 14(9) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act

3 of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; 110 Stat. 1549) is amend4 ed by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For

5 purposes of this paragraph, an amendment or other modi6 fication that is made, on or after June 13, 2001, to an

7 agreement or contract shall be treated as the entry of an

8 agreement or contract.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1954

AN ACT

To extend the authorities of the Iran and Libya

Sanctions Act of 1996 until 2006, and for otherpurposes.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 15





TXU Corp.:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries (TXU
Corp.) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, as indicated
in our report dated May 15, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Corp.'s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-37652, 333-64504,
333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01, 333-71004-02, 333-84418,
333-84418-01 and 333-84418-02 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No.
333-32833, 333-32837, 333-32843, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by
Post Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-93183, 333-62016, 333-62014,
333-86640, 333-92260 and 333-105133 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 15, 2003
Case 1:08-cv-00492-JL   Document 6   Filed 12/30/08   Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Charles Hughes

v. Civil No. 08-cv-75-JL

AT&T Inc.

O R D E R

Complaint Filed: 2/27/08

Summons Issued: 2/28/08

To date, the Court has received no return of service.

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), and the Order of Magistrate

James R. Muirhead dated 7/21/08, the case is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

August 27, 2008 ________________________________

 Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Court Judge

cc: William Charles Hughes

Case 1:08-cv-00075-JL Document 5 Filed 08/27/08 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.26





 Exhibit 10.26 

THE SYMBOL “[***]” DENOTES PLACES WHERE CERTAIN IDENTIFIED 

INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (i) 

NOT MATERIAL, AND (ii) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE 

COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED 
 This
document is an English translation of a document prepared in German. In preparing this document, an attempt has been made to translate as literally as possible without jeopardizing the overall continuity of the text. Inevitably, however, differences
may occur in translation and if they do, the German text will govern by law. 
 In this translation, German legal concepts are expressed in English
terms and not in their original German terms. The concepts concerned may not be identical to concepts described by the English terms as such terms may be understood under the laws of other jurisdictions. 

Addendum no. 1 
 of lease agreement for commercial
premises from 17.08.2011 
 between 
 As
landlord: 
 Wolfram Richter 
 Kupferbergterrasse 15, 17-19 
 55116 Mainz 
 Tel.:
[***]; fax: [***] 
 Tax number of the landlord: [***] 
 As
tenant: 
 BioNTech AG 
 Represented by the director [***]
(with German business degree) 
 Hölderlinstraße 8 
 D-55131 Mainz 
 registered in the commercial register of County Court Mainz, register number: HRB 41865 

concerning the office areas on 3rd floor (attic floor) of front building, approx. 244 m2. 
 The late completion of the expansion means that the above-mentioned office facilities could not be
taken over on 01.10.2011 according to the agreement in section 5 of the lease agreement from 17.08.2011 for commercial premises. This area was not ready for the tenant to move in until 01.11.2011. 

The parties therefore complete the following agreement to apply retrospectively from 01.10.2011: 

The lease agreement concerning the office areas on the 3rd floor (attic floor), approx. 244 m2 starts on 01.11.2011. The end of the lease agreement for this office area remains unchanged as 31.08.2013. 

All other provisions of the lease agreement from 17.08.2011 continue to apply unchanged. 

The rent paid by the tenant in excess for the month of October 2011 for the office area on the 3rd floor
of € [***] gross will be offset against the rent for the month of November 2011. 
 Signature and stamp of the landlord 

Mainz, on [pp.
signature]                                     

Signature and stamp of the tenant, 
 Michael Kring, director of
BioNTech AG 
 Mainz, on 17.02.12
[signature]
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated 

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 369,523 43,397 99,064 92,338 5,749 3,549 10,340 

Number of loans 15,699 2,480 3,653 4,341 761 187 932 

Weighted average maturity (months)1 29.95 14.37 38.03 47.79 3.93 6.62 10.61 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 8.83 9.61 4.30 13.52 2.88 .87 3.20 Weighted average risk rating3 2.29 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.21 6.63 6.31 6.58 7.89 5.98 6.72 

 Standard error5 .19 .34 .11 .13 .31 .88 .27 

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 7.00 7.23 6.62 7.25 9.38 6.68 7.18 

 25th percentile 5.51 6.00 6.08 6.00 6.94 5.50 6.37 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.29 6.79 6.28 6.37 n.a. n.a. 6.27 

 Other livestock 6.95 6.81 n.a. 7.33 9.22 5.57 6.11 

 Other current operating expenses7 5.88 6.44 6.38 6.48 7.81 6.03 6.69 

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.03 7.21 6.67 6.86 7.62 n.a. 7.04 

 Farm real estate 6.11 6.16 6.11 6.02 6.45 n.a. 7.36 

 Other8 5.63 5.11 6.35 7.23 7.75 n.a. 7.39 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 42.63 28.68 59.49 60.51 34.74 85.90 46.61 

 Under commitment 44.64 43.29 66.22 42.18 54.18 70.38 41.75 

 Callable 27.66 9.72 12.56 13.67 6.47 44.82 22.36 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 17.54 32.45 25.45 4.07 n.a. n.a. 11.13 

 Other livestock 14.30 7.34 18.81 13.33 8.62 11.75 10.31 

 Other current operating expenses7 47.51 38.41 29.25 61.42 80.21 88.25 52.74 

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.94 11.31 8.77 8.18 6.82 n.a. 12.99 

 Farm real estate 9.23 10.20 16.05 11.44 1.86 n.a. 6.31 

 Other8 3.48 .29 1.68 1.57 2.49 n.a. 6.53 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 14.57 10.44 19.96 17.08 5.34 45.77 n.a

 Other 80.34 85.82 79.34 70.76 75.52 34.97 82.64 

 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         126,606
<SECURITIES>                                    55,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (276)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,462
<PP&E>                                         504,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,412
<BONDS>                                         79,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,005<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,973<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,926
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,276
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,953
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
<FN>
<F1>REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $19,500 ALLOCABLE TO 195,000 SHARES OF TREASURY STOCK.
<F2>REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $4,196,000 ALLOCABLE TO 195,000 SHARES OF TREASURY
STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. 06-cv-293-SM

Charles Ward, et al. 

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated November 2, 2006, for the

reasons set forth therein. The plaintiff has alleged Eighth Amendment claims against

defendants Hartley and Ward based on the denial of adequate medical care. All

remaining claims are hereby dismissed. Plaintiff's motion for alternative service

(doc. no. 6) is granted. 

SO ORDERED.

December 1, 2006 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: William J. Carey, pro se 

Case 1:06-cv-00293-SM Document 14 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 1
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-73,178-12
IN RE ALBERT RANDOLPH, Re lator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 114-2075-07-N IN THE 114th DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM SMITH COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 114th District Court of Smit h County , that more than 35 day s have elapsed , an d that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Smit h County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

R el at o r has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Smit h County
. Sho u l d t h e response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.
Filed: September

30, 3015 Do not publish
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen L. Bartlett, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00358-JL

Mutual Pharmaceutical

Company, Inc., et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

October 16, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 19 Filed 10/07/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 7, 2008

cc: Keith M. Jensen, Esq.

Patrick J. O’Neal, Esq.

Christine M. Craig, Esq.

Leslie C. Nixon, Esq.

D. Michael Noonan, Esq.

Paul J. Cosgrove, Esq.

Mark W. Shaughnessy, Esq.

John E. Friberg, Esq.

Joseph P. Thomas, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 19 Filed 10/07/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  OCTOBER  31,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                MAY-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                            308
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                      164
<INVENTORY>                                     1,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,273
<PP&E>                                          1,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                    226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,505
<BONDS>                                           994
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,200
<OTHER-SE>                                      (348)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,215
<SALES>                                         7,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,639
<CGS>                                           6,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.30)
                                              


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-80- 01-SM

Michael Monahan

ORDER

Re: Document No. 72, Assented to MOTION to Withdraw Plea of Guilty to Count One of the

Information, and to Dismiss the Charge with Prejudice

Ruling: Granted. The motion to permit the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea, and to dismiss

Count One of the Information, is filed by the government, not the defendant. But, because it is said to be

filed with the assent of the defendant, I will accept it as the defendant's choice - i.e., that the defendant moves

to withdraw his plea to Count One of the Information. The best that can be said about the motion to

withdraw guilty plea is that it presents a close question. The "fair and just reason" test for withdrawing a

plea before sentencing is probably not ordinarily met when the reason given is, as it seems to be here, an

alleged mistake as to the ability of the government to marshal sufficient "admissible" evidence to obtain a

conviction at trial. The defendant, after all, admitted each and every essential element, based upon the

government's factual proffer - so there was no need for "admissible" evidence. That the defendant thought

he would be convicted anyway when he pled guilty, and now isn't so sure, is a fairly weak basis upon which

to allow a plea withdrawal. It is hardly unusual for a defendant's admissions to eliminate what might

otherwise be testy issues of proof for the government at trial, and, ordinarily, a different assessment of the

strength of the government's evidence, after factual admissions have been made in court and under oath, will

not suffice to undo a guilty plea. Nevertheless, as the government has filed the motion, and, importantly, also

seeks to dismiss that count as well, I will defer to the prosecutor's judgment and, in the interests of justice,

grant the motion to withdraw defendant's guilty plea to Count One, and dismiss Count One of the

Information, primarily because, absent unusual circumstances, I would normally grant a government motion

to dismiss a count prior to sentencing. So ordered. 

___

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: February 5, 2009

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 76 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 1