alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB

Union Calendar No. 64

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1866

[Report No. 107–120]

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis for granting

requests for reexamination of patents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2001

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JUNE 28, 2001

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis

for granting requests for reexamination of patents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1866 RH

1 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW QUES2 TION OF PATENTABILITY IN REEXAMINATION

3 PROCEEDINGS.

4 Sections 303(a) and 313(a) title 35, United States

5 Code, are each amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: ‘‘The existence of a substantial new question of

7 patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent

8 or printed publication was previously cited by or to the

9 Office.’’.

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with

12 respect to determinations of the Director of the United

13 States Patent and Trademark Office that are made under

14 section 303(a) or 313(a) of title 35, United States Code,

15 on and after the date of the enactment of this Act.

16 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW QUES17 TION OF PATENTABILITY IN REEXAMINATION

18 PROCEEDINGS.

19 Sections 303(a) and 312(a) of title 35, United States

20 Code, are each amended by adding at the end the following:

21 ‘‘The existence of a substantial new question of patent22 ability is not precluded by the fact that a patent or printed

23 publication was previously cited by or to the Office or con24 sidered by the Office.’’.
3

•HR 1866 RH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

3 respect to any determination of the Director of the United

4 States Patent and Trademark Office that is made under

5 section 303(a) or 312(a) of title 35, United States Code,

6 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Union Calendar No. 64

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1866

[Report No. 107–120]

A BILL

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify

the basis for granting requests for reexaminationof patents.

JUNE 28, 2001

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,

and ordered to be printed
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Energy, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ManuelPablo Zuniga-Pflucker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/ Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker* | * * |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------|--------|--------|
| Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker       |     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |     |   |
| August 9, 2007                                    |     |   |

 

3

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1885 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1885

 To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of 
 status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by 
     extending the deadline for classification petition and labor 
             certification filings, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2001

   Mr. Gekas (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. King, and Ms. Ros-
  Lehtinen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of 
 status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by 
     extending the deadline for classification petition and labor 
             certification filings, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Section 245(i) Extension Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    Section 245(i)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255(i)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``2001;'' and 
        inserting ``2001, or during the 120-day period beginning on the 
        date of the enactment of the Section 245(i) Extension Act of 
        2001;''; and
            (2) by amending subparagraph (C) to read as follows:
            ``(C) who, in the case of a beneficiary of a petition for 
        classification, or an application for labor certification, 
        described in subparagraph (B) that was filed after January 14, 
        1998--
                    ``(i) was physically present in the United States 
                on December 21, 2000; and
                    ``(ii) demonstrates that the familial or employment 
                relationship that is the basis of such petition for 
                classification or application for labor certification 
                existed on or before April 30, 2001;''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Natural Blue Resources, Inc.
(the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge,
that:





1.      The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  April
      2, 2010/s/  Walter
      CruikshankWalter
      CruikshankChief
      Financial Officer





The
certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Natural Blue Solutions, Inc. and will be
retained by Natural Blue Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







103380018.1
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2003: Q3... 17 61 22 22 65 13 17 78 5 21 71 8 11 60 

 Q4... 15 58 27 31 59 10 13 80 7 17 76 8 11 54 2004: Q1... 13 56 31 20 71 10 15 73 12 11 71 18 16 50  Q2... 17 60 22 26 64 10 18 73 9 12 74 14 15 63  Q3... 13 60 27 27 64 9 15 79 6 12 66 22 11 58  Q4... 9 58 33 14 75 10 12 81 7 10 77 13 10 50 2005: Q1... 9 61 30 16 72 12 11 80 9 12 78 9 9 52  Q2... 14 62 24 21 70 9 12 82 7 18 68 15 9 58  Q3... 10 57 33 16 73 11 7 89 5 14 63 23 9 42 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2003: Q3... 17 72 12 16 65 19 14 81 6 12 85 3 11 76 

 Q4... 18 68 13 22 62 16 17 80 3 14 84 2 10 76 2004: Q1... 11 70 19 13 75 12 11 83 6 11 86 3 11 72  Q2... 16 68 16 27 60 13 15 81 4 11 85 4 15 70  Q3... 16 61 23 23 61 16 11 84 4 7 83 10 9 64  Q4... 12 71 17 13 72 15 11 89 0 9 84 7 7 74 2005: Q1... 12 69 19 19 66 15 16 80 4 11 84 5 11 68  Q2... 15 69 15 15 74 12 13 80 2 8 82 5 10 72  Q3... 12 67 21 17 68 15 12 81 1 7 83 5 8 70 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2003: Q3... 14 71 14 7 80 13 33 60 7 11 74 16 10 81 

 Q4... 21 74 5 12 82 6 17 78 6 15 75 10 14 82 2004: Q1... 10 81 10 17 61 22 24 71 6 23 68 9 12 76  Q2... 4 92 4 0 89 11 0 94 6 9 86 5 8 84  Q3... 30 61 9 22 67 11 32 63 5 39 57 4 23 69  Q4... 22 65 13 18 71 12 17 72 11 13 78 9 20 60 2005: Q1... 18 73 9 19 71 10 14 81 5 4 96 0 16 68  Q2... 11 67 22 7 87 7 27 73 0 19 81 0 11 67  Q3... 24 71 5 6 89 6 13 88 0 11 11 0 5 19  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
54074 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 182 / Thursday, September 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 

the proposed Tilden allotment, the 

counterproposal requests the 

substitution of Channel 296A for vacant 

Channel 250A at George West, Texas, 

which in turn requires the substitution 

of Channel 246A for Channel 296A at 

Beeville, Texas, and modification of the 

Station KRXB(FM) license. We hereby 

change the effective date of this final 

rule in compliance with 47 CFR 1.427 

because the final rule was never 

published in the Federal Register. 

Accordingly, the Report and Order is 

made effective 30 days from the time the 

final rule for the above caption 

proceeding is published in the Federal 

Register. 

DATES: Effective October 20, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2180. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Report 

and Order, MB Docket No. 07–78, 

adopted January 9, 2008, and January 

11, 2008. The full text of this 

Commission decision is available for 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the Commission’s 

Reference Information Center, 445 

Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. The complete text of this 

decision may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 

1–800–378–3160 or http:// 

www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission 

will send a copy of this Report and 

Order in a report to be sent to Congress 

and the Government Accountability 

Office pursuant to the Congressional 

Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

■ As stated in the preamble, the Federal 

Communications Commission amends 

47 CFR part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Texas, is amended by 

adding Christine, Channel 245C3. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. E8–21739 Filed 9–17–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 97 

Amateur Radio Service 

CFR Correction 

In title 47 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, part 80 to end, revised as 

of October 1, 2007, on page 594, in 

§ 97.109, remove paragraph (e). 

[FR Doc. E8–21929 Filed 9–17–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his/her knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
------------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
January 15, 2006


/S/ MOMOKO A. BERAN
-----------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
January 15, 2006

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
#### Glen S. Udell, Appellant, v Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[807 NYS2d 575]

In an action, inter alia, to reinstate two disability income insurance policies and to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), entered June 21, 2004, as granted the motion of the defendants Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and Disability Management Services, Inc., for *794summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and granted that branch of the separate motion of the defendant Ronald Roth which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and (2) an order of the same court dated September 9, 2004.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 9, 2004, is dismissed as abandoned (see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e] [1]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered June 21, 2004, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and Disability Management Services, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Equitable defendants), and Ronald Roth established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. The burden then shifted to the plaintiff to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). However, the plaintiff presented conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations, which were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., supra*at 325; *Zuckerman v City of New York, supra*at 562). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the Equitable defendants and that branch of Ronald Roth’s separate motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to them.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
*Release Date: December 21, 2007*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 7    | 0                                      | 1                                                     | 2 | 4 | .031 | .000 | .003 | .009 | .017 |
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| 20   | 2                                      | 6                                                     | 1 | 12 | .042 | .003 | .012 | .002 | .023 |
| n.a. | -3                                     | 0                                                     | 5 | n.a. | n.a. | -.006 | .000 | .009 | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION




In
      connection with the Annual Report of SPO Medical Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jeff Feuer, Principal Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






MARCH
      20,
      2007


/s/
      Jeff
      Feuer


Jeff
      Feuer


Chief
      Financial Officer






A
      SIGNED
      ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED
      TO
      SPO MEDICAL INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SPO MEDICAL INC. AND FURNISHED TO
      THE
      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Ex parte James MELVIN.

No. 45810.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 12, 1972.

William B. Portis, Jr., Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus hearing, remanding appellant to custody for extradition to the State of Alabama.

The State introduced into evidence the Executive Warrant of the Governor of this State. The Warrant recites that the appellant stands charged by information and supporting affidavit before the proper authorities, with the crime of burglary and grand larceny.

The Executive Warrant of the Governor of Texas, which appears regular on its face, made out a prima facie case authorizing remand of appellant to custody for extradition. Ex parte Jackson, Tex.Cr.App., 470 S.W.2d 679; Ex parte Rhodes, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 425; Ex parte Slavin, Tex.Cr.App., 461 S.W.2d 421.

Appellant contends that he entered a plea of guilty to burglary and grand larceny in Alabama, and that the conviction was void “of the necessary procedures in accepting a plea of guilty.” 1

*647The validity of a conviction in the State of Alabama is a question for the courts sitting in Alabama. Ex parte McCarthy, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 759; Ex parte Venable, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 86; Ex parte Knoll, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 174, 339 S.W.2d 678.

No error has been shown. The order remanding appellant to custody for extradition is affirmed.

No motion for rehearing will be filed by the clerk, except by leave of the court.

Opinion approved by the Court.

1

. The document attached to appellant’s brief was not introduced into evidence and is not before us for review.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted
pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director

May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western
Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.