alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

Theresa Grimm

v . Civil No. 07-cv-400-JL

Ralph W . Shirley Post #46, Incorporated

ORDER

Re : Document No . 7, Assented to Motion to Extend Time to

Object/Respond to Motion to Dismis s

Ruling : Granted . Plaintiff's counsel is reminded to comply

with the requirements of Local Rule 7 .2(a) when filing motions to

extend time, even when the assent of adverse counsel has been

obtained . While obviously not a major infraction of the rules,

compliance will assist the Court in handling motions expeditiously .

To the extent that the motion requests leave to treat the

defendant's motion for summary judgment, the motion is denied .

While the Court appreciates both parties' willingness to advance

the procedural posture of the case to the summary judgment stage,

counsel are instructed to restrict themselves to the procedural and

substantive standards applicable to the defendant's motion as

originally styled : a motion to dismiss . If plaintiff's position is

that the defendant has introduced information outside the proper

scope of a motion to dismiss, plaintiff's counsel should note as

much in plaintiff's objection .

/s/ Joseph Laplante

Joseph Laplante

U .S . District Judge

Date : January 21, 200 8

cc : Leslie H . Johnson, Esq .

Linda S . Johnson, Esq .

Michael T . Pearson, Esq .

Case 1:07-cv-00400-JL Document 8 Filed 01/21/08 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:05-cv-00254-PB Document 9 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 1
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFOPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens HoldingCo. for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert J.DiNicola, as Chief Executive Officer of Linens Holding Co., and Francis M.Rowan, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LinensHolding Co.

 

 
| /s/ Robert J. DiNicola |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
| **Name:**              | Robert J. DiNicola        |
| **Title:**             | Chairman and Chief        |
|                   | Executive Officer         |
| **Date:**              | November 13, 2007         |
| ** **             |                      |
| ** **             |                      |
| /s/ Francis M. Rowan   |                      |
| **Name:**              | Francis M. Rowan          |
| **Title:**             | Senior Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer   |
| **Date:**              | November 13, 2007         |
|                        |                           |  |  |

 

----
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2004: Q3... 6.6 6.6 n.a. 6.3

 Q4... 6.8 6.8 n.a. 6.4

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.1 n.a. 6.6

 Q2... 7.3 7.3 n.a. 6.7

 Q3... 7.6 7.7 n.a. 7.0

 Q4... 8.0 8.0 n.a. 7.3

2006: Q1... 8.3 8.3 n.a. 7.5

 Q2... 8.7 8.8 n.a. 7.9

 Q3... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.8

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2004: Q3... 7.4 7.4 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.0

2005: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.9 7.4

 Q2... 8.1 8.3 8.2 7.6

 Q3... 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.0

 Q4... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.1

2006: Q1... 9.0 9.2 8.8 8.2

 Q2... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.1

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2004: Q3... 7.2 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q4... 7.4 7.0 7.1 6.9

2005: Q1... 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.2

 Q2... 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.7

 Q3... 8.1 8.0 8.0 7.9

 Q4... 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.0

2006: Q1... 8.9 9.1 8.7 8.4

 Q2... 9.0 9.2 8.8 8.8

 Q3... 9.3 9.2 8.8 8.6
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2004: Q3... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.7 7.7 7.3

 Q2... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.2 8.1 7.6

 Q4... n.a. 8.5 8.4 7.9

2006: Q1... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.1

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.2 9.1 8.5

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2004: Q3... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.7

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.9

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.4 7.1

 Q2... n.a. 7.7 7.7 7.3

 Q3... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.3 7.8

2006: Q1... n.a. 8.4 8.5 7.9

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.9 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.1 8.5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2004: Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 7.4 7.8 7.7

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.7 7.9 7.8

 Q2... n.a. 7.5 7.9 7.9

 Q3... n.a. 8.3 8.2 8.1

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

2006: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.7 8.2

 Q2... n.a. 9.2 8.9 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-21065

Conference Calendar

 

IROW FONTENOT,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARK BOYLE,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-92-CV-148

- - - - - - - - - -

June 25, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

If necessary, this Court must examine the basis of its

jurisdiction on its own motion. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659,

660 (5th Cir. 1987). Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R. App. P., requires

that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30

days of entry of the judgment or order from which an appeal is

taken. In this prisoner civil rights action, the final judgment

was entered on July 27, 1995. Fontenot’s (#619588) notice of
No. 95-21065

- 2 -

appeal was filed no earlier than on December 7, 1995. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(c). Because Fontenot’s notice of appeal was filed

more than thirty days after entry of the judgement, this court is

without jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed. Robbins

v. Maggio, 750 F.2d 405, 408 (5th Cir. 1985). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Amendment No. 1 to License No. 23072 (registration series A 022575)



 Exhibit 4.16.1 
  
 Ministry of the Russian Federation for Telecommunications and Information Technologies 
  
 Amendment No. 1 
 to License No. 23072 (registration series A 022575) 
 dated August 1, 2002

  
 To amend clause 8 of the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under
License No. 23072 to read as follows: 
  
 “8. Telematic services shall be
provided to the users of the cellular mobile communications network and of the telematic services of OJSC “Vimpelcom-Region”. 
  

					
	 First Deputy Minister
 of the Russian
Federation for
 Telecommunications and
 Information
Technologies
	    	 /Signature/
	    	B.D. Antonyuk
			
	 	    	 /seal/
	    	 December 30, 2003

			
	 Deputy Head of the Department
 of the
Organization
 of Licensing Activity
	    	 /Signature/
	    	B.V. Vorobyev
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53890-53891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3294-EM]


Texas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Texas (FEMA-3294-EM), dated September 10, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 11, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas for which the President declared an emergency on 
September 10, 2008:


[[Page 53891]]


    Bexar, Cherokee, Collin, Comal, Dallas, Denton, El Paso, Ellis, 
Hunt, Kaufman, Lubbock, Navarro, Smith, Van Zandt, Walker, Waller, 
and Wood Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), 
including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21773 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 189 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 189

         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Stump introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT OF 1993.

    The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg et 
seq.) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
ROBERTO L. NORTON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4426

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed January 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James O. Shelfer , Judge

.

Roberto L. Norton, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE 
 TULARIK INC. 1997 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 At a meeting of the Board of Directors of Tularik Inc. on March 28, 2004, the following amendment to the Tularik Inc. 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted, effective as of March 28, 2004:

  
 Section 6(f) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following: 
  
 “Termination of Employment or
Relationship as a Director or Consultant. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Board, in its sole discretion, may provide in an Option Agreement, or amend an Option Agreement to provide, an Optionee with the
right to continue to vest in an Option for a certain period of time following the date the Optionee’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates (“Continued Vesting Period”), as specified in the Option
Agreement, and to exercise such Option during such Continued Vesting Period and for a certain period of time following such Continued Vesting Period, as specified in the Option Agreement; provided, however, that no Option may be exercised
after the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Option Agreement.” 
  
 Except as amended above, the Plan remains in full force and effect. 
  
 The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing is true, correct and complete. 
  

	
	
	 /s/ William J. Rieflin

	

	 William J. Rieflin
 Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00574

- CV

James Allen Brickley, Jr. , Appellant

v. Marie Laurence Gloria Joseph

- Stephen , Appellee

FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 22DFAM331978 , THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DU S KIE , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on September 2 6 , 2022

. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit this Court fro m granting extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, including

those from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, any extensions of time granted for the filing of the r e p orters’ records may not exceed 30 days cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Cheryl Dixon is h ereby ordered to file the reporter’s record in this case on or before Decem ber 1 4 , 2022 . If the record is not filed by that date, Dixon m a y be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt

of court.2 It is order ed on December 12 , 2022

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana , and Kelly
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2017

p0125

Order 

Clerk

February 1, 2017

154029

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154029

COA: 325640

Wayne CC: 14-006694-FH

GREGORY LAMONT GLENN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1913

To require the valuation of nontribal interest ownership of subsurface rights

within the boundaries of the Acoma Indian Reservation, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 2001

Mr. SKEEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To require the valuation of nontribal interest ownership of

subsurface rights within the boundaries of the Acoma

Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PUEBLO OF ACOMA LAND AND MINERAL CON4 SOLIDATION.

5 (a) VALUATION.—Not later than 6 months after the

6 date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of the

7 Interior shall determine the extent and the value of the

8 nontribal interest ownership of the subsurface rights, in-
2

•HR 1913 IH

1 cluding mineral rights, within the boundaries of the

2 Acoma Indian Reservation.

3 (b) LAND EXCHANGES.—Upon completion of the

4 valuation required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall

5 negotiate an exchange with any willing sellers of interests

6 in nontribal land (including interests in mineral or other

7 surface or subsurface rights) within the boundaries of the

8 Acoma Indian Reservation for interests in Federal land

9 that is—

10 (1) located within the boundaries of the State

11 of New Mexico;

12 (2) identified by the Bureau of Land Manage13 ment as available for disposal; and

14 (3) of approximately the same value as the in15 terest in land for which it is being exchanged.

16 (c) TIMELINE; LAND TAKEN INTO TRUST.—The Sec17 retary shall complete such negotiations and exchanges not

18 later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

19 section and shall place interests in land within the bound20 aries of the Acoma Indian Reservation that are acquired

21 under this section into trust for the Pueblo of Acoma.

Æ
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 2014


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: April 29, 2015
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------