alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2005: Q2... 14 62 24 21 70 9 12 82 7 18 68 15 9 58 

 Q3... 10 57 33 16 73 11 7 89 5 14 63 23 9 42  Q4... 10 51 39 17 65 17 12 83 5 17 67 16 7 39 2006: Q1... 8 55 37 21 72 7 12 81 7 17 63 19 7 39  Q2... 16 55 29 15 78 7 13 80 7 15 60 25 10 49  Q3... 12 58 30 17 71 11 15 77 9 11 60 28 8 45  Q4... 18 47 35 27 66 7 15 78 7 9 53 38 17 40 2007: Q1... 10 51 38 23 68 8 13 79 8 5 51 45 9 42  Q2... 10 59 30 23 71 6 12 79 8 8 48 44 11 55 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2005: Q2... 15 69 15 15 74 12 13 80 2 8 82 5 10 72 

 Q3... 12 67 21 17 68 15 12 81 1 7 83 5 8 70  Q4... 12 73 15 17 64 19 12 79 4 13 76 6 12 69 2006: Q1... 23 58 19 25 67 8 12 83 5 14 83 3 21 62  Q2... 25 61 14 35 61 4 11 82 2 13 77 5 20 58  Q3... 23 63 14 21 67 12 11 80 4 11 85 5 13 59  Q4... 14 66 20 26 63 11 10 80 5 10 85 6 11 66 2007: Q1... 13 64 24 18 72 10 12 77 5 12 81 7 7 65  Q2... 8 66 26 15 75 11 17 76 2 13 81 7 8 69 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2005: Q2... 11 67 22 7 87 7 27 73 0 19 81 0 11 67 

 Q3... 24 71 5 6 89 6 13 88 0 11 11 0 5 19  Q4... 28 61 11 14 71 14 20 80 0 13 75 13 26 58 2006: Q1... 21 63 16 19 69 13 19 81 0 22 72 6 23 68  Q2... 16 74 11 0 87 13 21 79 0 13 81 6 21 68  Q3... 47 53 0 29 64 7 31 69 0 31 69 0 42 58  Q4... 25 70 5 18 76 6 24 76 0 16 68 16 25 70 2007: Q1... 26 58 16 20 67 13 21 64 14 44 50 6 21 58  Q2... 12 88 0 6 94 0 13 88 0 11 78 11 11 84  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         458,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  357,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,653,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,542,012
<PP&E>                                       7,908,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,240,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,289,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          883,756
<BONDS>                                      3,110,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,584,708
<COMMON>                                    10,585,784
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,875,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,289,676
<SALES>                                      4,168,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,168,988
<CGS>                                        3,585,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,585,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             338,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,063,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,063,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,063,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.50)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-07-PB

Jeffrey Munroe

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize plea negotiations or prepare a

defense. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to July 10, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00007-PB Document 12 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 22, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to

June 28, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 21, 2007

cc: James Gleason, Esq.

Karin Eckel, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00007-PB Document 12 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1995...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003...... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005...... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

1998: Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.1 .8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999: Q1... 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .4 3.7 2.1 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.3 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .5 2.2 .8 1.4 .4 1.0

 Q4... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000: Q1... 1.3 .6 .6 .2 .5 3.0 1.5 1.5 .4 1.1

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.2 .9 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 1.9 .7 1.2 .2 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001: Q1... 1.7 1.0 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.2 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q2... 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .4 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Q3... 1.2 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004: Q1... 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5 3.0 1.3 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .7 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.3 1.2 1.1 .3 .9

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .3 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02006
          0
          n.a.
          n.a.
          0
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 11, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1696 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1696

   To expedite the construction of the World War II memorial in the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2001

   Mr. Stump (for himself, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
 Evans, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Hyde, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Spence, Mr. 
 Dingell, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Houghton, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Regula, Mr. 
Gilman, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Callahan, 
Mr. Everett, and Ms. Lofgren) introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To expedite the construction of the World War II memorial in the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPEDITED COMMENCEMENT BY AMERICAN BATTLE MONUMENTS 
              COMMISSION OF CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

    Section 2113 of title 36, United States Code, as added by section 
601(a) of the Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act (Public 
Law 106-117; 113 Stat. 1576), is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(i) Congressional Direction to Commence Construction.--(1) The 
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et 
seq.), and all other laws pertaining to the siting and design for the 
World War II memorial having been met, the Commission shall 
expeditiously proceed with the construction of the World War II 
memorial at the dedicated Rainbow Pool site in the District of 
Columbia.
    ``(2) The construction of the World War II memorial authorized by 
paragraph (1) shall be consistent with--
            ``(A) the final architectural submission made to the 
        Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning 
        Commission on June 30, 2000, as supplemented on November 2, 
        2000; and
            ``(B) such reasonable construction permit requirements as 
        may be required by the Secretary of the Interior, acting 
        through the National Park Service.
    ``(3) The decision to construct the World War II memorial at the 
dedicated Rainbow Pool site, decisions implementing this subsection, 
and decisions regarding the design for the World War II memorial are 
final and conclusive and shall not be subject to administrative or 
judicial review.''.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7188

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TYLER SCHER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cr - 00725

- RMG

- 1 ; 2:20

- cv 01589

- RMG )

Submitted : December 21, 2020 Decided: January 25, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Elizabeth Anne Franklin

- Best , ELIZABETH FRANKLIN

- BEST, P.C. , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyler Scher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a co nstitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scher has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certi ficate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
No. 07-14-00390-CR

April Hope Gallardo

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 64th District Court

 of Castro County

March 27, 2015

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 27, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02006
          0
          0
          0
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: January 08, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         63,389
<SECURITIES>                                   27,955
<RECEIVABLES>                                  45,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,236
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,664,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          78,383
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32,616
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,552,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,664,626
<SALES>                                        45,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               45,500
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               99,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (58,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (58,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SYLVESTER GOULD

, §

§ No. 457

, 201 8

Defendant Below, §

Appellant

, § Court Below : Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No

. 1607021540 ( N )

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below

, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: December 21, 2018

Decided: January 3 , 201 9

O R D E R

On December 3

, 2018, the Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing

the appellant to show cause why th is appeal should not be dismissed for the

appellant’s failure to file the opening brief . Th e appellant received the notice to

show cause on December 10 , 2018 but did not respond to it, and he has not filed the

opening brief

. Accordingly, d ismissal of th e appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that th e appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11434]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Maine ( FEMA-1788-DR), dated 09/09/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         07/18/2008 through 08/16/2008.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         09/09/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/10/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/10/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/09/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                    Androscoggin, Cumberland, York. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Maine: Franklin, Kennebec, Oxford, Sagadahoc. New Hampshire: Carroll, Strafford. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and for economic injury is 11434. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-22520 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mark R. Mandeville

v. Civil No. 05-cv-92-JD

Merrimack County Department

of Corrections, et al.

Procedural Order

Now that the motions for summary judgment are resolved, the

issues that remain in the case are established. Trial is

scheduled to begin on July 22, 2008. Before the final pretrial

conference, which is scheduled for July 10, 2008, the court

expects the parties, through counsel, to use their best good

faith efforts to resolve the remaining claims. To that end, the

parties may use the court’s mediation resources or schedule

private mediation to assist in settlement.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 22, 2008

cc: W. Kirk Abbott, Jr., Esquire

Charles P. Bauer, Esquire

John A. Curran, Esquire

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esquire

Lisa Lee, Esquire

Daniel J. Mullen, Esquire

Michael J. Sheehan, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00092-JD Document 112 Filed 05/22/08 Page 1 of 1