alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________
No. 02

- 19

- 00149

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 352

- 290806

- 17

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M ATTHEW 

### M URRAY AND 

### C OCA



### - C OLA 

### R EFRESHMENTS 

### USA, I NC



### . , Appellants

V



### .
S TEPHEN 

### W

ATSON AND 

### L

YNNDORA 

### R

AN SOM 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY 

### , AND ON 

### B EHALF OF 

### D ESMOND 

### J ONES 

### , D ECEASED 

### , Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have consider ed “Appellants ’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal except cost s associated with the

cross

- appeal that this court has alre ady ordered cross

- appellants to pay

. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Del ivered : Augu st 27, 2019
#### AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT v. DESHAZOR.

No. 7423.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1950.

Leo Gold, Alexandria, for appellant.

James R. Eubank, Alexandria, for ap-pellee.

HARDY, Judge.

Plaintiff insurer, as subrogee of its insured, seeks to recover by this action the sum of $147.21 paid its assured for damages to an automobile, sustained in an accident. After trial there was-judgment in favor of defendant rejecting plaintiff’s demands, from which plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The accident which gives rise to this suit occurred at the corner of Tenth and Murray Streets in the City of Alexandria, Rapides Parish, Louisiana, on June 14, 1946. At the intersection, traffic is controlled by a signal light. The assured’s car was proceeding west on Murray Street, while defendant was driving his truck north on Tenth Street. The collision occurred at or about the center of the intersection and the points of damages sustained by the respective vehicles were the right front of defendant’s truck and the left side, both front and rear, of assured’s automobile. After the collision defendant’s truck came to rest by the west curb of Tenth Street immediately past the intersection, while the assured’s automobile continued in a generally forward direction, deflecting a little to the west, jumping a curb at the northwest corner of the intersection and crashing into a vehicle parked on a used car lot at that location.

The testimony tendered by witnesses for plaintiff and defendant respectively is directly contradictory and irreconcilable. Two witnesses for plaintiff testified that the traffic signal displayed a green light for traffic on Murray Street,- while two witnesses on behalf of defendant are equally as positive.that the green light at the time gave rightrof-way to traffic on Tenth Street. Little help in the attempt, to arrive at a conclusion is offered by the physical facts and -circumstances surrounding the collision. However, it is evident that the assured’s car was proceeding at a considerably greater rate of speed than defendant’s truck.

In the light of the conflict of what appears to ibe equally credible testimony and further consideration of the impossibility of drawing any justifiable conclusions from the physical facts, it is clear that plaintiff has failed to make out its case with that certainty and by that preponderance of evidence which is required.

Additionally, it is observed that under these circumstances, that is, where testimony -for the respective parties is apparently of equal weight and value, the determination of the matter by the District Judge must be accorded unusual weight and consideration, Certainly it could not be said that manifest error is evident.

For the reasons set forth, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael F. Schmidt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James E. RiesenbachJames E. RiesenbachChief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2006/s/ Michael F. SchmidtMichael F. SchmidtExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1991...... 7.3 6.7 8.5 7.2 24.6 5.3 7.7 8.3 10.6 5.8 

1992...... 8.9 6.1 9.5 8.6 20.1 9.4 8.3 9.7 11.1 7.2 

1993...... 9.2 7.3 9.6 8.3 30.4 9.4 8.5 10.0 11.1 7.4 1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 

2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 

2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2000: Q1... 11.2 9.0 10.4 10.0 17.4 14.1 9.8 12.0 10.9 11.4  Q2... 11.6 9.7 9.3 10.1 22.3 13.4 10.8 11.9 11.7 11.6 

 Q3... 11.1 6.7 14.8 9.1 30.7 10.2 9.0 11.2 10.2 11.9 

 Q4... 10.6 7.2 9.7 7.9 25.8 14.5 8.9 10.5 11.5 10.5 

2001: Q1... 18.7 8.7 18.6 12.4 30.6 25.9 9.9 13.3 13.5 23.0 

 Q2... 11.8 8.1 16.9 10.2 14.0 12.8 11.1 11.9 12.5 11.6  Q3... 11.0 6.8 10.7 8.6 32.3 11.3 9.1 11.2 11.8 10.9  Q4... 10.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 31.4 9.9 7.6 11.1 12.1 10.3 2002: Q1... 11.7 9.3 9.7 10.9 29.8 10.8 10.0 12.4 14.6 10.3  Q2... 13.4 11.3 19.6 10.6 27.7 16.8 10.2 12.6 14.2 13.8  Q3... 9.9 6.3 8.0 9.8 12.7 10.6 9.4 9.4 10.6 9.7  Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3 

 Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Lakeview Management, Inc.;

Lakeview Neurorehabilitation

Center, Inc.; and Lakeview

Neurorehab Center Midwest, Inc.,

v. Civil No. 07-cv-303-SM

Care Realty, LLC; and

THCI Company, LLC,

O R D E R

A further status conference was held on April 16, 2010. 

Despite extensive efforts, the parties have been unable to reach

agreement with respect to the judgment amount that should be

entered. They disagree about two issues that will determine that

calculation, and they agree that upon resolution of each issue,

the resulting number will not be disputed.

On or before April 30, 2010, the parties shall brief the

following issues;

1. Whether the remaining issues (proper accounting for

group home revenues, and for interest on a substantial payment

made by plaintiffs) should be resolved 1) after an evidentiary

hearing or 2) on the record as it currently stands.

2. The court’s jurisdiction to conduct a further

evidentiary hearing with respect to those issues, given the

pending cross-appeals.

3. If the parties agree (as they seem to) that the

interest issue can be resolved on the current record (or with

stipulations) then they should brief their respective positions

on whether the payment did or did not stop interest from

accumulating on that sum.

Case 1:07-cv-00303-SM Document 195 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

April 12, 2010

cc: Christopher H. M. Carter, Esq.

Daniel M. Deschenes, Esq.

Ovide M. Lamontagne, Esq.

Jonathan M. Shirley, Esq.

Leigh S. Willey, Esq.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00303-SM Document 195 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55199-55200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6257]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Subcommittee Meetings

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC), through its Subcommittee 
on Radiocommunications and Search and Rescue Sub-Committee, will 
conduct open meetings at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, October 15, 2008; 
Wednesday, November 5, 2008; and Wednesday, December 17, 2008. The 
meetings are scheduled to be held in suite 1060 of the Radio Technical 
Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM), 1800 North Kent Street, 
Arlington, VA 22209. The purpose of these SHC subcommittee meetings is 
to prepare for the 13th Session of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) Subcommittee on Radiocommunications and Search and 
Rescue (COMSAR 13) to be held at IMO Headquarters in London, England 
from January 19-23, 2009. The primary matters to be considered at 
COMSAR 13 include:
    <bullet> Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS);
    <bullet> International Telecommunication Union (ITU) maritime 
radiocommunication matters;
    <bullet> Satellite services (Inmarsat and Cospas-Sarsat);
    <bullet> Matters concerning search and rescue, including those 
related to the 1979 SAR Conference and the implementation of the GMDSS;
    <bullet> Developments in maritime radiocommunication systems and 
technology;
    <bullet> Revision of the International Aeronautical and Maritime 
Search and Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual;
    <bullet> Development of procedures for updating shipborne 
navigation and communication equipment;
    <bullet> Measures to protect the safety of persons rescued at sea;
    <bullet> Work program and agenda for COMSAR 14;
    <bullet> Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman for 2010.
    Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating 
capacity of the rooms. Interested persons may seek information, 
including meeting room numbers, by writing: Mr. Russell S. Levin, U.S. 
Coast Guard Headquarters, Commandant (CG-622), Jemal Building Room 
JR10-1216, 1900 Half Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593 or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ddff8fefee8e1e1a3dea3c1e8fbe4e3cdf8feeeeaa3e0e4e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7624030505131a1a5825583a13001f183603051511581b1f1a">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 55200]]


    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Mark Skolnicki,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E8-22432 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Cindy Stanley

v. Case No. 02-cv-601-PB

JoAnn Barnhart, Commissioner 

Social Security Administration

O R D E R

Judgment for the plaintiff shall be entered in accordance with the decision of the

Administrative Law Judge dated January 16, 2004.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

October 19, 2005 Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Raymond Kelly, Esq.

David Broderick, Esq.

Case 1:02-cv-00601-PB Document 5 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Agency

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Part 51

### CFR Correction

In title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, revised as of October 1, 2007, on page 956, in § 51.107, the last sentence is removed.

[FR Doc. E8-22596 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-40-01-SM

Paul Dimick

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 17) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than December 28, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:05-cr-00040-SM Document 18 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: February 22, 2006 at 3:30 PM 

Jury Selection: March 7, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

December 15, 2005 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Mark Irish, Esq.

 Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00040-SM Document 18 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review RFA DE-08-1 17 P01s.                     

*Date:*                         December 3, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 2 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, Bethesda, MD 20817.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Jonathan Horsford, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Natl. Inst. of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Insitutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Room 664, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4859,                         *horsforj@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 18, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E8-22652 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Bea BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

July 16, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

TXU Corp.:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries (TXU
Corp.) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, as
indicated in our report dated August 13, 2002; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Corp.'s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-27989, 333-32831,
333-37652, 333-56055 as amended by Post-Effective Amendments No. 1 and 2
thereto, 333-64504, 333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01,
333-71004-02, 333-84418, 333-84418-01 and 333-84418-02 on Form S-3 and
Registration Statements No. 333-32833, 333-32835, 333-32837, 333-32839,
333-32841, 333-32843, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-93181 as amended by Post Effective
Amendments No. 1 and 2 thereto, 333-93183, 333-62016, 333-62014, 333-86640 and
333-92260 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
August 13, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Wm. Barrett Wellman, Chief Financial Officer of CoJax Oil and Gas Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IMS Health Incorporated, et. al.

v. Civil Action No. 06-CV-280-PB

 

Kelly Ayotte, as Attorney General

 of the State of New Hampshire

J U D G M E N T

This action came on for trial before the Court, Honorable Paul Barbadoro, District Judge,

presiding, and the issues having been duly tried on January 29, 2007 - February 5, 2007, and a

decision having been duly rendered on April 30, 2007. 

It is Ordered, Declared, and Adjudged

1. That 2006 N.H. Laws Chap. 328, Codified at N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 318:47-f,

 318:47-g and 318-B:12, violates the First Amendment to the extent that it prohibits

 the transfer, use, sale, or licensing of prescriber-identifiable data.

2. That the New Hampshire Attorney General is permanently enjoined from enforcing 

 the above-mentioned law to the extent that it prohibits the transfer, use, sale, or

 licensing of prescriber-identifiable data. 

Dated at Concord, New Hampshire, this 7 day of May, 2007.

/s/ James R. Starr 

James R. Starr, Clerk of Court

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 127 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
II

Calendar No. 334

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1748

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 13, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

MARCH 21, 2002

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 805 Glen Burnie Road in Richmond, Virginia,

as the ‘‘Tom Bliley Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 805 Glen Burnie Road in Richmond, Virginia,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tom Bliley Post

7 Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1748 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Tom Bliley Post Office Building’’.

Calendar No. 334

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1748

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 805 Glen Burnie Road in

Richmond, Virginia, as the ‘‘Tom Bliley Post Office Building’’.

MARCH 21, 2002

Reported without amendment