alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-85-PB

Leon Peoples

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

September 5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to schedule a hearing on the negotiated plea

agreement. The government does not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from September 5, 2007 to October 10, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 28, 2007

cc: Andrew Schulman, Esq.

Jennifer C. Davis, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00085-PB Document 17 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mark Mandeville

v. Civil No. 05-cv-092-JD

Carole Anderson, et al.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Mark Mandeville filed a multi-claim suit against a number of

employees of the Merrimack County Department of Corrections. The

matter came before me for preliminary review to determine whether

Mandeville had stated any claims upon which relief might be

granted, and if so, which defendants should be served with the

claims. I issued both a Report and Recommendation and an Order

on July 21, 2005 (document nos. 5 & 6) directing that some of the

claims be served against some of the named defendants, and

recommending that some of the claims and defendants be dismissed

from the action. The District Judge approved the Report and

Recommendation on August 29, 2005 (document no. 11). 

As a result of the Court’s approval of the Report and

Recommendation, Mandeville’s claim alleging verbal harassment was

dismissed from this action. The Report and Recommendation

Case 1:05-cv-00092-JD Document 35 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

inadvertently neglected to specifically recommend dismissal of

one of the named defendants to that claim, Sgt. Joel Robinson. 

Robinson was not alleged to be a defendant to any of the other

claims in Mandeville’s complaint. Robinson has not yet been

dismissed from or served with this action as a defendant. I now

recommend that Robinson be dismissed from this action, as the

complaint failed to allege any claim against him upon which

relief might be granted.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United

States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 24, 2006

cc: W. Kirk Abbott, Jr., Esq.

 John A. Curran, Esq.

 Lisa Lee, Esq.

 Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

 Ralph Suozzo, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00092-JD Document 35 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2005


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Pure Barnyard, Inc.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-501-JL

Organic Labroatories, Inc.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself from this case. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

Landya B. McCafferty

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 8, 2011

cc: Gary W. Callahan, Esq.

Christopher Cole, Esq.

William S. Gannon, Esq.

Courtney H.G. Herz, Esq.

Karyl Roberts Martin, Esq.

Robert H. Miller, Esq.

Byeongsook Seo, Esq.

Mark F. Weaver, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00501-JL Document 105 Filed 09/08/11 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

USA

v. 1:07-mc-06-PB

Calvin F. Dunn

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated 4/16/07.

SO ORDERED.

5/02/07 _/s/ Paul Barbadoro____ __

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Calvin F. Dunn. pro se

T. David Plourde, Esq.

Case 1:07-mc-00006-PB Document 10 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 1
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1983
          1
          1
          2
          3
          71984
          3
          7
          10
          12
          321985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 30, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Nicholaus Samora

v. Civil No. 07-cv-079-PB

Angela Poulin, et al.

O R D E R

 The Clerk is ordered to serve the Motion for Preliminary

Injunction with the preliminary review Order and Complaint. An

evidentiary hearing on the motion will be held on June 6, 2007 at

10:30 a.m. The New Hampshire Correctional Facility is ordered to

transport the plaintiff and Harvey Pratt to the hearing. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 8, 2007

cc: Nicholaus Samora, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00079-JM Document 9 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-24-01-SM

Thomas Anderson

O R D E R

Defendant Anderson’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 12). Trial has been rescheduled for the September 

2007 trial period. Defendant Anderson shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than July 9, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00024-SM Document 13 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 26, 2007

cc: Philip Utter, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00024-SM Document 13 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XK36


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting; 
Cancellation

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council has cancelled the 
public meeting of its Groundfish Committee that was scheduled for 
Monday, September 29, 2008 beginning at 9 a.m., in Peabody, MA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The initial notice was published on 
September 11, 2008, (73 FR 52831), and the meeting will be rescheduled 
at a later date and announced in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-21900 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1984
          3
          7
          10
          12
          321985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          0 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: January 25, 2006
**
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Zhichen (Frank) Sun, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Q&KInternational Group Limited; 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 4.
The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 
 (b)
[intentionally omitted] 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 
 5.
The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe company’s internal control over financial reporting. 
**

Date: February 18, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Zhichen (Frank) Sun

Name:
 
Zhichen (Frank) Sun

Title:
 
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
Exhibit 21
**MAJOR SUBSIDIARIES OF LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC.**
     The following indicates the corporate names (and all other significantnames, if any, under which business is conducted) and jurisdictions ofincorporation of the subsidiaries of Lafarge North America, all of which arewholly-owned or majority-owned. Indirect subsidiaries of Lafarge North Americaare indented and listed following their direct parent corporations.   Name(s) Jurisdiction of Incorporation    American Transport Leasing, Inc. DelawareCement Transport, Ltd. North DakotaFriday Harbor Sand & Gravel Co. WashingtonInternational Atlantins Insurance Company VermontLafarge Dakota Inc. North DakotaLafarge Florida Inc. FloridaLafarge Midwest, Inc. DelawareMineral Solutions Inc. DelawarePresque Isle Corporation DelawareRedland Inc. DelawareRedland Genstar, Inc. DelawareLafarge West Inc. DelawareSierra Bay Receivables Inc. NevadaSystech Environmental Corporation DelawareLafarge Canada Inc. CanadaGestion Carim Inc. QuebecInternational Atlantins Agencies Inc. British ColumbiaJohnson Concrete & Material Ltd. SaskatchewanLCI-Warren Merger Inc. CanadaLafarge Canada Finance Inc. CanadaThe Warren Paving & Materials Group Limited OntarioLes sablières Forestville Inc. QuebecLulu Transport Inc. British ColumbiaN C Rubber Products Inc. OntarioQuality Ready-Mix Limited OntarioRe-Wa Holdings Ltd. AlbertaRichvale York Block Inc. OntarioValley Rite-Mix Ltd. British Columbia
     Lafarge North America also does business under the following names:Florida Portland Cement Company, Lafarge Construction Materials, LafargeGypsum, Trinity Portland Cement Company.
     Lafarge Canada Inc. also does business under the following names: AlbertaConcrete Products, Apex Gravel, Bestpipe, Canada Concrete, Capital Concrete,Challenge Concrete, Champion Concrete, Cinq Concrete, Coldstream Concrete,Columbia Concrete, Conmac Western Industries, Country Building Supplies, CrownEquipment, Crown Paving and Engineering, Duracon, Francon-Lafarge, Great LakesFlyash, High River Concrete, Johnston Ready Mix, Lafarge Concrete, LafargeConstruction Materials, Lafarge Gypsum, Lethbridge Concrete Products, MaritimeCement, Nelson Aggregate Co., O.K. Construction Materials, Permanent-Lafarge,Red-D-Mix Block, Richvale — McCord, Richvale — York, Rocky Mountain Precast,Spartan Explosives, Standard Aggregates, Standard Asphalt, Supercrete,Trans-Alta Flyash.
 

 

     Information regarding 86 additional subsidiaries of the Registrant hasbeen omitted because such subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a singlesubsidiary, do not constitute a “significant subsidiary” as defined in Rule1-02(v) of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210.1-02(v)].
Order for Extension of Time - p age 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Case No. DA - 23 - 0108 ANTHONY REED , Petitioner/Appellant , and CATHERINE MARTIN , Respondent/Appellee. ORDER UPON MOTION of the Appellant, with no objection from the Appellee, and with good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of Appellant’s Opening Brief is extended, with the new deadline for filing being May 21, 2023.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 19 2023

04/19/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0108
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.1(a)

                     Revised Schedule to Severance Agreement

Horace Mann Educators Corporation ("HMEC") entered into severance agreements
with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are
substantially identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 except that (1) the
multiple of the highest annual compensation received by the employee in the five
preceding years used to determine a one-time cash payment is equal to the
duration listed below and (2) the specified period during which such employee's
insurance benefits would continue is equal to the duration below, and except as
indicated in footnote (a).

Employee                Duration    Agreement Date
---------------------   ---------   --------------
Louis G. Lower II (a)   3 years       02-01-2000

Ann M. Caparros         2.9 years     03-07-1994
Peter H. Heckman        2.9 years     04-10-2000
H. Albert Inkel         2.9 years     12-27-1991
Douglas W. Reynolds     2.9 years     11-12-2001

Paul D. Andrews         2 years       07-02-2001
Ronnie H. Byers         2 years       03-16-2000
Valerie A. Chrisman     2 years       12-27-1991
Bret A. Conklin         2 years       01-14-2002
Dwayne D. Hallman       2 years       01-21-2003
William S. Hinkle       2 years       07-19-1999
Deborah F. Kretchmar    2 years       06-17-2002
Ricky A. Renner         2 years       07-09-2001
Robert E. Rich          2 years       02-19-2001
Peter M. Titone         2 years       01-08-2001

----------
(a)  HMEC entered into a severance agreement with Louis G. Lower II as set forth
     in the Lower Employment Agreement contained in Exhibit 10.12 to HMEC's
     Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K intothe following Registration Statements of Lafarge North America (formerlyLafarge Corporation) previously filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission: (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 2-92414, (ii)Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-9813, (iii) RegistrationStatement on Form S-8, File No. 33-32645, (iv) Registration Statement on FormS-3, File No. 33-32644 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 6to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (v) RegistrationStatement on Form S-8, File No. 33-20865, (vi) Registration Statement on FormS-3, File No. 33-46093 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 7of Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (vii) RegistrationStatement on Form S-8, File No. 33-51873, (viii) Registration Statement on FormS-8, File No. 333-65897, (ix) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No.333-65899, and (x) Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-57333.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 9, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00805

- CR

Edward J ames DWYER Jr.

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B14568

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The

appellant’s brief is due July 11, 2016.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court