alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
syna-ex1033_524.htm



 

Exhibit 10.33

 

Written Description of the Synaptics Incorporated Retention Program Adopted May 6, 2019

 

On May 6, 2019, the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of Synaptics Incorporated (“Synaptics”) instituted a retention program applicable to certain of Synaptics’ executive officers.

 

The retention program provides that the participating executive officers will receive lump-sum cash award payments (determined in each case by the Executive Committee) in November 2020 should they remain as full-time active employees of Synaptics in good standing for 18 consecutive calendar months starting May 1, 2019. Certain voluntary and unpaid leaves will result in a termination of the applicable retention award. No retention award will be paid to any executive who resigns without Good Reason or who is terminated for Good Cause prior to the end of the retention period (both capitalized terms as defined in the Synaptics Incorporated Severance Policy for Principal Executive Officers, which has previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission). Should Synaptics terminate a participating executive’s employment without Good Cause, or if such executive resigns for Good Reason, Synaptics will pay (i) two-thirds of such executive’s eligible award if the termination occurs during the first twelve months of the retention period, and (ii) a portion of such executive’s eligible award prorated for the actual number of consecutive full calendar months completed as a full-time employee of Synaptics if the termination occurs between the twelfth and eighteenth month of the retention period, provided that such executive resigns from all Synaptics and Synaptics’ affiliate director and officer positions and executes a separation agreement and release in a form acceptable to Synaptics.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UMG Recordings, Inc., et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00090-JL

Mavis Roy

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

August 26, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 18) is approved as

submitted, with the following changes:

TRIAL DATE: October, 2009

Based on the discussions between the court and

counsel/parties at the conference, the following affirmative

defenses are stricken without prejudice to being re-instated on

request if warranted by the evidence: statute of limitations

(¶23), laches (¶24), waiver (¶26), and estoppel (¶27).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Case 1:08-cv-00090-JL Document 20 Filed 08/27/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Dated: August 27, 2008

cc: Christopher Cole, Esq.

Laurie J. Rust, Esq.

Peter S. Wright, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00090-JL Document 20 Filed 08/27/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEETS OF POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000        JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000        JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000        OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                         124,654             71,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,733             44,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,511              2,683
<INVENTORY>                                     43,183             22,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,677            151,317
<PP&E>                                          86,881             36,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,475             10,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,207            198,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,110             45,842
<BONDS>                                              0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  0
<COMMON>                                       211,272            111,408
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,846             40,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,207            198,411
<SALES>                                        326,190            201,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326,190            201,417
<CGS>                                          221,238            146,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,639            184,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27                635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,623             18,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,326              6,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,297             11,873
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                  0
<CHANGES>                                            0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,297             11,873
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .55                .20<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52                .20<F1>
<FN>
<F1> EPS for the period ending Oct-03-1999 has been restated to reflect a
3-for-1 stock split on May 15, 2000.
</FN>


</TABLE>
*Release Date: September 30, 2008*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| 20   | 2                                      | 6                                                     | 1 | 12 | .042 | .003 | .012 | .002 | .023 |
| 8    | -3                                     | 0                                                     | 5 | 6 | .015 | -.006 | .000 | .009 | .011 |
| n.a. | 5                                      | 8                                                     | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | .008 | .013 | n.a. | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
##### 



Exhibit  11
  Milacron
    Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Computation of Per-Share Earnings
  2005


2004


2003(In thousands, except per-share
    amounts)Loss from continuing operations

$
(16,516
)

$
(51,304
)

$
(183,677
)Income (loss) from discontinued
    operations


2,549



(479
)


(7,174
)Net loss


(13,967
)


(51,783
)


(190,851
)Less preferred dividends


(6,180
)


(3,150
)


(240
)Less beneficial conversion feature
    related to Series B Preferred Stock






(15,931
)


Net loss applicable to common
    shareholders

$
(20,147
)

$
(70,864
)

$
(191,091
)Basic loss per share:Weighted-average common shares
    outstanding


47,665



40,955



36,660Per share amount:Continuing operations

$
(.47
)

$
(1.72
)

$
(5.02
)Discontinued operations


.05



(.01
)


(.19
)Net loss

$
(.42
)

$
(1.73
)

$
(5.21
)Diluted loss per share:Weighted-average common shares
    outstanding(a)


47,665



40,955



36,660Per share amount:Continuing operations

$
(.47
)

$
(1.72
)

$
(5.02
)Discontinued operations


.05



(.01
)


(.19
)Net loss

$
(.42
)

$
(1.73
)

$
(5.21
)     (a)
    
    In 2005 and 2004, the common shares into which
    the Series B Preferred Stock is convertible are excluded
    because their inclusion would result in a smaller loss per
    common share. In all years, potentially dilutive restricted
    shares are also excluded for similar reasons.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 5.0 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 

1991: Q4... 100 * * 2.00 16.00 10.00 17.00 18.00 22.00 10.00 4.00 * * * * 

1992: Q4... 100 12.00 7.00 20.00 16.00 22.00 16.00 7.00 1.00 * * * * * * 

1993: Q4... 100 8.00 8.00 26.00 16.00 20.00 18.00 3.00 2.00 * * * * * * 

1994: Q4... 100 * 3.00 15.00 27.00 23.00 20.00 6.00 6.00 * * * * * * 

1995: Q4... 100 * .01 10.00 12.00 11.00 30.00 25.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 .01 * .01 * 

1996: Q4... 100 * .01 19.00 8.00 27.00 25.00 16.00 4.00 1.00 .01 * .01 .01 * 

1997: Q4... 100 * .01 5.00 6.00 34.00 31.00 16.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

1998: Q4... 100 .01 .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 * * * 

1999: Q4... 100 .01 .01 3.00 9.00 30.00 36.00 17.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 

2000: Q4... 100 * .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

2001: Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 

2002: Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 

1999: Q2... 100 .01 4.00 4.00 12.00 37.00 30.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 * * 

 Q3... 100 * 2.00 4.00 10.00 35.00 32.00 12.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

 Q4... 100 .01 .01 3.00 9.00 30.00 36.00 17.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 

2000: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 4.00 30.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 

 Q2... 100 .01 .01 .01 4.00 19.00 36.00 27.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

 Q3... 100 .01 .01 1.00 1.00 16.00 30.00 28.00 19.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 

 Q4... 100 * .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 

2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 

 Q2... 100 .01 3.00 8.00 29.00 31.00 22.00 5.00 2.00 .39 .07 .03 .01 * * 

 Q3... 100 1.10 9.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 12.00 3.00 1.00 .26 .01 * * * * 

 Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 

2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 

 Q2... 100 23.24 22.45 17.77 22.77 10.15 2.75 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 

 Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * * 

 Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 

 Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest rfrom the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1934

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify

the depreciable life of printed wiring board and printed wiring assembly

equipment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2001

Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. DEAL

of Georgia, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. OBERSTAR,

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. GORDON, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms.

DELAURO, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. COX, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. DOYLE,

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. EHRLICH, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. HERGER, and

Mr. GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify the depreciable life of printed wiring board

and printed wiring assembly equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Printed Circuit Invest5 ment Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1934 IH

1 SEC. 2. 3-YEAR DEPRECIABLE LIFE FOR PRINTED WIRING

2 BOARD AND PRINTED WIRING ASSEMBLY

3 EQUIPMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

5 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

6 to classification of property) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’

7 at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at the end

8 of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the

9 end thereof the following new clause:

10 ‘‘(iv) any printed wiring board or

11 printed wiring assembly equipment.’’

12 (b) 3-YEAR CLASS LIFE.—Subparagraph (B) of sec13 tion 168(g)(3) of such Code is amended by inserting after

14 the item relating to subparagraph (A)(iii) the following

15 new item:

‘‘(A)(iv) ................................................................................. 3’’.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to equipment placed in service

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
|   | 1. | the      Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for      the quarterly period ended June 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |   |                       |                                                                                              |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   |                       |
| Date:      March 8, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/      RONALD J. BUSCHUR |
|                     |   |   |                       | Ronald      J. BuschurPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerPowerwave      Technologies, Inc. |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

John Baldi

v. Case No. 04-cv-466-01-PB

Opinion No. 2006 DNH 143C

John Broderick, Jr.

O R D E R

Ronald and Gail Brown have moved for a default judgment with

respect to their counterclaims against John Baldi. The Browns

allege in the motion that a default judgment is warranted because

Baldi failed to file answers to interrogatories and failed to

file a final pretrial statement. Further, after the Browns filed

their motion for default judgment, they appeared at the final

pretrial conference and orally complained that a default judgment

should also be entered because Baldi failed to attend the

conference. Baldi has responded with an objection challenging

the validity of the counterclaims and arguing that I must be

barred from presiding over the case. However, he does not

challenge the Browns’ contentions that he failed to respond to

the interrogatories and failed without justification to file a 

Case 1:04-cv-00466-PB Document 105 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 3
-2-

pretrial statement. Nor has he offered an explanation for his

failure to attend the pretrial conference. 

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permit the entry of a

default judgment for the failure to respond to interrogatories,

see Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d), the failure to file a pretrial

statement, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c), and the failure to attend a

pretrial conference, Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); see also Guex v.

Allmerica Financial Life Ins. and Annuity Co., 146 F.3d 40, 41

(1st Cir. 1998); Hathrock v. Navistar Int’l Transp. Corp., 53

F.3d 36, 40 (4th Cir. 1995). While a default judgment obviously

is a severe sanction that should not be imposed lightly, it is

warranted in cases like this where the resulting harm is severe,

lesser sanctions are insufficient, and the offending party’s

behavior is inexcusable. 

I have no doubt that the Browns have been severely

prejudiced by Baldi’s failure to respond to interrogatories and

his failure to file a pretrial statement. Indeed, I do not see

how they could possibly be ready for trial without the

information they seek. I also have no reason to believe that

lesser sanctions will bring Baldi into compliance with the

court’s rules and orders because he has made no attempt to

Case 1:04-cv-00466-PB Document 105 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 3
-3-

justify or excuse his noncompliance. Moreover, his failure to

attend the final pretrial conference even after he had been

served with the Motion for Default Judgment suggests that he has

no intention to fulfill his duties as a litigant. Accordingly, I

grant the Browns’ Motion for Default Judgment (Document No. 99)

and refer the case to the Magistrate Judge for a hearing on

damages. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 18, 2006

cc: John A. Baldi, pro se

Charles Russell, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00466-PB Document 105 Filed 12/18/06 Page 3 of 3
#### J. W. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. Willadeane STEPHENS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Oct. 26, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DataMEG,Corp., a New York corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the yearending  December 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew Benson,Chairman and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to myknowledge:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Andrew Benson                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:  Andrew Benson                        |
| Chairman  and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.9 12.5 1.5 .0 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007: Q1... 100.0 84.9 12.9 2.0 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.2 12.2 2.5 .1 ... ...

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mohammed Reza Enayat

v. Civil No. 06-cv-190-JD

United States of America

O R D E R

A petition has been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

claiming ineffective assistance of counsel during the underlying

criminal case (United States v. Enayat, 03-cr-082-01-JD). 

The petitioner currently has a direct appeal pending in the

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Absent extraordinary

circumstances, which do not appear to exist in this case, it is

the rule in this circuit that the district court should decline

to hear a section 2255 petition based on claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel until the direct appeal has been decided.

Therefore, the petition is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

June 12, 2006

cc: Mohammed Reza Enayat, pro se

Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00190-JD Document 4 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 1