Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Notices 57591 

Conference Room 540, Washington, DC 

20425. The purpose of the briefing 

meeting is to review education issues 

the District of Columbia. 

Members of the public are invited to 

offer comments—written comments 

must be received in the Eastern Regional 

Office by Monday, November 17, 2008. 

The address is Eastern Regional Office, 

624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, 

Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing 

to e-mail their comments or who desire 

additional information should contact 

Alfreda Greene, Secretary, at 202–376– 

7533, or by e-mail: agreene@usccr.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons who will 

attend the meeting and require the 

services of a sign language interpreter 

should contact the Regional Office at 

least ten (10) working days before the 

scheduled date of the meeting. 

Records generated from this meeting 

may be inspected and reproduced at the 

Eastern Regional Office, as they become 

available, both before and after the 

meeting. Persons interested in the work 

of this advisory committee are advised 

to go to the Commission’s Web site, 

http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the 

Eastern Regional Office at the above email or street address. 

The meeting will be conducted 

pursuant to the provisions of the rules 

and regulations of the Commission and 

FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, September 30, 

2008. 

Christopher Byrnes, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. E8–23435 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Membership of the Office of the 

Secretary Performance Review Board 

AGENCY: Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Membership on the 

Office of the Secretary Performance 

Review Board. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

4314(c)(4), Department of Commerce 

(DOC) announces the appointment of 

persons to serve as members of the 

Office of the Secretary (OS) Performance 

Review Board (PRB). The OS PRB is 

responsible for reviewing performance 

Ratings, pay adjustments and bonuses of 

Senior Executive Service (SES) 

members. The term of the new members 

of the OS PRB will expire December 31, 

2010. 

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date 

of service of appointees to the Office of 

the Secretary Performance Review 

Board is upon publication of this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Denise A. Yaag, Director, Office of 

Executive Resources, Office of Human 

Resources Management, Office of the 

Director, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482– 

3600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

names, position titles, and type of 

appointment of the members of the OS/ 

PRB are set forth below by organization: 

Department of Commerce 

Office of the Secretary 

2008–2010 

Performance Review Board Membership 

Office of the Secretary 

Alicemary O. Leach, Director, 

Executive Secretariat. Earl B. Neal, 

Director, Office of Information 

Technology, Security, Infrastructure, 

and Technology. 

Office of Assistant Secretary for 

Administration 

Fred Fanning, Director for 

Administrative Services. Suzan J. 

Aramaki, Director, Office of Civil Rights. 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

W. Todd Grams, Chief Financial 

Officer for NIST. 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Daniel W. Stockton, Program 

Executive Officer, National PolarOrbiting Operational Environmental 

Satellite System. 

Office of the General Counsel 

Michael A. Levitt, Assistant General 

Counsel for Legislation and Regulation. 

Joan Maginnis, Assistant General 

Counsel for Finance and Litigation 

(Alternate). 

Dated: September 24, 2008. 

Denise A. Yaag, 

Director, Office of Executive Resources. 

[FR Doc. E8–23281 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–BS–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–894] 

Certain Tissue Paper Products From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Affirmative Final Determination of 

Circumvention of the Antidumping 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Final Determination 

We determine that certain tissue 

paper products (‘‘tissue paper’’) 

produced by Vietnam Quijiang Paper 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Quijiang’’) are circumventing 

the antidumping duty order on tissue 

paper from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), as provided in section 

781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Notice of 

Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Tissue Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China, 70 FR 16223 (March 

30, 2005) (‘‘Order’’). 

DATES: Effective Date: October 3, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia 

Hancock, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1394. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 22, 2008, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published in the Federal Register the 

affirmative preliminary determination 

that certain tissue paper products 

(‘‘tissue paper’’) produced by Quijiang 

are circumventing the Order on tissue 

paper from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), as provided in section 

781(b) of the Act. See Certain Tissue 

Paper Products From the People’s 

Republic of China: Affirmative 

Preliminary Determination of 

Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty 

Order and Extension of Final 

Determination, 73 FR 21580 (April 22, 

2008) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

Additionally, the Department published 

in the Federal Register a correction to 

its preliminary determination of 

circumvention on May 23, 2008. See 

Certain Tissue Paper Products From the 

People’s Republic of China: Correction 

to Affirmative Preliminary 

Determination of Circumvention of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR 30053 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

57592 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Notices 

1Seaman Paper Company of Massachusetts, Inc. 

(‘‘Petitioner ’’). 

2On January 30, 2007, at the direction of U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’), the 

Department added the following HTSUS 

classifications to the AD/CVD module for tissue 

paper: 4802.54.3100, 4802.54.6100, and 

4823.90.6700. However, we note that the six-digit 

classifications for these numbers were already listed 

in the scope. 

(May 23, 2008) (‘‘Correction to 

Preliminary Determination’’). 

On June 3, 2008, Petitioner 1 filed its 

case brief. Quijiang did not file a case 

brief, but on June 5, 2008, Quijiang filed 

its rebuttal brief. Additionally, on June 

24, 2008, the Department extended the 

final determination by 60 days to 

September 19, 2008. See Letter to All 

Interested Parties from Catherine 

Bertrand, Program Manager, Re: 

Circumvention Inquiry on Certain 

Tissue Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Final 

Determination, (June 24, 2008). 

On August 19, 2008, Petitioner 

submitted comments regarding 

Quijiang’s participation in the third 

administrative review of this Order, 

which contained new factual 

information. Although Petitioner’s 

comments were untimely, on August 27, 

2008, the Department issued a letter to 

interested parties notifying them that it 

was accepting Petitioner’s August 19, 

2008, submission, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.302(b) and inviting comments from 

Quijiang and other interested parties. 

No comments were submitted. 

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order 

The tissue paper products subject to 

this order are cut-to-length sheets of 

tissue paper having a basis weight not 

exceeding 29 grams per square meter. 

Tissue paper products subject to this 

order may or may not be bleached, dyecolored, surface-colored, glazed, surface 

decorated or printed, sequined, 

crinkled, embossed, and/or die cut. The 

tissue paper subject to this order is in 

the form of cut-to-length sheets of tissue 

paper with a width equal to or greater 

than one-half (0.5) inch. Subject tissue 

paper may be flat or folded, and may be 

packaged by banding or wrapping with 

paper or film, by placing in plastic or 

film bags, and/or by placing in boxes for 

distribution and use by the ultimate 

consumer. Packages of tissue paper 

subject to this order may consist solely 

of tissue paper of one color and/or style, 

or may contain multiple colors and/or 

styles. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

does not have specific classification 

numbers assigned to them under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Subject 

merchandise may be under one or more 

of several different subheadings, 

including: 4802.30; 4802.54; 4802.61; 

4802.62; 4802.69; 4804.31.1000; 

4804.31.2000; 4804.31.4020; 

4804.31.4040; 4804.31.6000; 4804.39; 

4805.91.1090; 4805.91.5000; 

4805.91.7000; 4806.40; 4808.30; 

4808.90; 4811.90; 4823.90; 4820.50.00; 

4802.90.00; 4805.91.90; 9505.90.40. The 

tariff classifications are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive.2

Excluded from the scope of this order 

are the following tissue paper products: 

(1) Tissue paper products that are 

coated in wax, paraffin, or polymers, of 

a kind used in floral and food service 

applications; (2) tissue paper products 

that have been perforated, embossed, or 

die-cut to the shape of a toilet seat, i.e., 

disposable sanitary covers for toilet 

seats; (3) toilet or facial tissue stock, 

towel or napkin stock, paper of a kind 

used for household or sanitary 

purposes, cellulose wadding, and webs 

of cellulose fibers (HTSUS 

4803.00.20.00 and 4803.00.40.00). 

Scope of the Circumvention Inquiry 

The products covered by this inquiry 

are jumbo rolls of tissue paper that are 

exported from the PRC to the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’) where 

they are converted, possibly dyed and/ 

or printed, into tissue paper products, as 

described above in the ‘‘Scope of the 

Antidumping Duty Order’’ section. This 

inquiry only covers such products that 

are exported to the United States by 

Quijiang. 

Statutory Provisions Regarding 

Circumvention 

Section 781(b) of the Act provides 

that the Department may find 

circumvention of an antidumping duty 

order when merchandise of the same 

class or kind subject to the order is 

completed or assembled in a foreign 

country other than the country to which 

the order applies. In conducting 

circumvention inquiries under section 

781(b) of the Act, the Department relies 

upon the following criteria: (A) 

Merchandise imported into the United 

States is of the same class or kind as any 

merchandise produced in a foreign 

country that is subject to an 

antidumping duty order; (B) before 

importation into the United States, such 

imported merchandise is completed or 

assembled in another foreign country 

from merchandise which is subject to 

the order or produced in the foreign 

country that is subject to the order; (C) 

the process of assembly or completion 

in the foreign country referred to in (B) 

is minor or insignificant; and (D) the 

value of the merchandise produced in 

the foreign country to which the 

antidumping duty order applies is a 

significant portion of the total value of 

the merchandise exported to the United 

States. 

Section 781(b)(2) of the Act provides 

the criteria for determining whether the 

process of assembly or completion is 

minor or insignificant. These criteria 

are: 

(a) The level of investment in the 

foreign country; 

(b) The level of research and 

development in the foreign country; 

(c) The nature of the production 

process in the foreign country; 

(d) The extent of the production 

facilities in the foreign country; and 

(e) Whether the value of the 

processing performed in the foreign 

country represents a small proportion of 

the value of the merchandise imported 

into the United States. 

The Statement of Administrative 

Action (‘‘SAA’’) accompanying the 

Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H. 

Doc. No. 103–316, at 893 (1994), 

provides some guidance with respect to 

these criteria. It explains that no single 

factor listed in section 781(b)(2) of the 

Act will be controlling. Accordingly, it 

is the Department’s practice to evaluate 

each of the factors as they exist in the 

United States or foreign country 

depending on the particular 

circumvention scenario. Therefore, the 

importance of any one of the factors 

listed under section 781(b)(2) of the Act 

can vary from case to case depending on 

the particular circumstances unique to 

each circumvention inquiry. 

In this circumvention inquiry, for the 

final determination, we continued to 

base our analysis on both qualitative 

and quantitative factors in determining 

whether the process of converting the 

jumbo rolls in Vietnam was minor or 

insignificant, in accordance with the 

criteria of section 781(b)(2) of the Act. 

This approach is consistent with our 

analysis in prior circumvention 

inquiries. See Anti-Circumvention 

Inquiry of the Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain 

Pasta From Italy: Affirmative 

Preliminary Determinations of 

Circumvention of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 68 FR 

46571 (August 6, 2003) (‘‘Pasta 

Circumvention Prelim’’) (unchanged in 

Pasta Circumvention Final, 68 FR 

54888). 

In making a determination whether to 

include merchandise assembled or 

completed in a foreign country within 

an order, section 781(b)(3) of the Act 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Notices 57593 

instructs us to take into account such 

factors as: (A) The pattern of trade, 

including sourcing patterns; (B) whether 

affiliation exists between the exporter of 

the merchandise and the person who 

uses the merchandise to assemble or 

complete in the foreign country the 

merchandise that is sold in the United 

States; and (C) whether imports into the 

foreign country of the merchandise 

described in section 781(b)(1)(B) have 

increased since the initiation of the 

original investigation. Each of these 

factors is examined below. 

For the final determination, we have 

continued to use the information 

gathered from the questionnaire 

responses submitted by Quijiang and its 

PRC parent company, Guilin Qifeng 

Paper Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guilin Qifeng’’), for 

purposes of conducting both qualitative 

and quantitative analyses in accordance 

with the criteria enumerated in section 

781(b) of the Act as outlined above. 

Summary of Statutory Analysis 

As discussed above, in order to make 

an affirmative final determination of 

circumvention, all the elements under 

sections 781(b)(1) of the Act must be 

satisfied, taking into account the factors 

under section 781(b)(2). In addition, 

section 781(b)(3) of the Act instructs the 

Department to consider, in determining 

whether to include merchandise 

assembled or completed in a foreign 

country within the scope of an order, 

such factors as: pattern of trade, 

affiliation, and whether imports into the 

foreign country of the merchandise 

described in section 781(b)(1)(B) have 

increased after the initiation of the 

investigation. Because no party 

submitted comments regarding our 

circumvention analysis, pursuant to 

section 781(b)(1) of the Act, we continue 

to find that the merchandise sold in the 

United States is within the same class 

or kind of merchandise that is subject to 

the Order and was completed or 

assembled in a third country. See 

Preliminary Determination, 73 FR at 

21582. Additionally, because no party 

submitted comments regarding our 

circumvention analysis, pursuant to 

section 781(b)(2), we continue to find 

that the process of assembly of the PRCorigin jumbo rolls to cut-to-length tissue 

paper by Quijiang is minor and 

insignificant. Id., at 21582–85. 

Furthermore, because no party 

submitted comments regarding our 

circumvention analysis, in accordance 

with sections 781(b)(1)(D) and 

781(b)(1)(E) of the Act, we continue to 

find that the value of the merchandise 

produced in the PRC is a significant 

portion of the total value of the 

merchandise exported to the United 

States, see id. at 21584–85, and that 

action is appropriate to prevent evasion 

of the Order. Thus, we continue to find 

affirmative evidence of circumvention 

in accordance with sections 781(b)(1) 

and (2) of the Act. Moreover, we 

continue to find the factors required by 

section 781(b)(3) of the Act indicate that 

there is circumvention of the Order. 

Consequently, our statutory analysis 

leads us to continue to find that during 

the period from July 2004 to July 2006, 

Quijiang circumvented the Order as a 

result of its exports to the United States 

of PRC-origin jumbo rolls converted to 

cut-to-length tissue paper in Vietnam, as 

discussed above. 

Facts Available 

Petitioner requested in its case brief 

that we apply total adverse facts 

available (‘‘AFA’’) to Quijiang for 

purposes of this final determination. 

Pursuant to section 776 of the Act, we 

find that the application of facts 

otherwise available is not warranted 

under sections 776(a)(1) or (2) of the Act 

because Quijiang submitted the 

requested information by the required 

deadlines, provided information in a 

timely manner and in the form or 

manner requested, and did not 

significantly impede this proceeding 

under the antidumping statute. Further, 

no verification took place of Quijiang’s 

data because the Department chose not 

to conduct verification given the 

particular facts of this case, not because 

of any deficiency in Quijiang’s 

responses. We disagree with Petitioner’s 

contention that there is record evidence 

demonstrating that Quijiang’s data is 

unreliable. In fact, we find that there is 

substantial evidence on the record 

demonstrating that Quijiang’s 

statements and submitted data are 

reliable. Therefore, we find that, 

pursuant to sections 776(a)(1) and (2) of 

the Act, there is no basis for applying 

facts available, much less adverse facts 

available, to Quijiang for the final 

determination. For further discussion 

and greater detail on the Department’s 

analysis on this issue, please see 

Comment 1 of the Memorandum to 

David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration, from 

Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

Subject: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final 

Determination of the Anticircumvention 

Inquiry of Certain Tissue Paper Products 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) (‘‘Issues and Decision Memo’’). 

Other Issues 

All issues raised by the interested 

parties to which we have responded are 

listed in the Appendix to this notice and 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memo, which is hereby adopted by this 

notice. 

In its case brief, Petitioner raised an 

argument regarding the public ranging 

of the average value of the value added 

to the finished merchandise by 

Quijiang’s processing. Because the 

publicly ranged average value is within 

ten percent of the actual figure, 

pursuant to section 351.304(c) of the 

Department’s regulations, we find that 

we correctly ranged the average value of 

the value added to finished 

merchandise by Quijiang’s processing. 

See Comment 2 of the Issues and 

Decision Memo. 

Petitioner also argued in its case brief 

that the record evidence shows that 

Quijiang, contrary to its own 

declarations, has continued to import 

semi-completed tissue paper products 

from the PRC after July 2006. Petitioner 

therefore argued that the Department 

should cease its certification program 

and require suspension of liquidation of 

all Quijiang’s imports of subject 

merchandise. However, we find that the 

only information on the record 

supporting Petitioner’s claim is an 

affidavit from Petitioner’s own market 

researcher. Absent import or other such 

documentation, we do not believe the 

substantial evidence on the record 

supports Petitioner’s allegation that 

Quijiang has continued to import PRCsemi completed tissue paper products 

that were converted into finished 

merchandise and exported to the United 

States beyond July 2006. Accordingly, 

because Quijiang sourced jumbo rolls 

from a PRC supplier to produce tissue 

paper products, which were exported to 

the United States, we continue to find 

that circumvention occured between 

July 2004 and July 2006 in this final 

determination. With respect to 

Quijiang’s current U.S. exports, we have 

determined that the certification 

program remains appropriate for 

Quijiang’s exports to the United States 

of tissue paper products produced from 

Vietnamese-origin paper. For further 

discussion of this issue, please see 

Comments 1 and 3 of the Issues and 

Decision Memo. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of the issues raised in this inquiry and 

corresponding recommendation in this 

public memorandum, which are on file 

in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), 

Room 1117 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/. 

The paper copy and electronic version 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

57594 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Notices 

of the Issues and Decision Memo are 

identical in content. 

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

In accordance with section 733(d) of 

the Act, the Department will continue to 

direct CBP to suspend liquidation and 

to require a cash deposit of estimated 

duties, at the PRC-wide rate of 112.64 

percent, on all unliquidated entries of 

certain tissue paper products produced 

by Quijiang that were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption, from on or after 

September 5, 2006, the date of initiation 

of the circumvention inquiry, with the 

exception described below. 

For all entries of Quijiang’s tissue 

paper products for which the U.S. 

importer submits a certification from 

Quijiang that the merchandise is nonsubject, (i.e., of Vietnamese-origin and 

not produced using PRC-origin jumbo 

rolls), the Department will continue to 

direct CBP to liquidate those entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For further discussion of this issue, 

please see Comment 2 of the Issues and 

Decision Memo. The Department will 

not request that CBP suspend 

liquidation, or require a cash deposit of 

estimated duties at the PRC-wide rate, 

for any entries of tissue paper 

accompanied by the certification in 

Appendix II of this notice. However, the 

Department will direct CBP to suspend 

liquidation and to require a cash deposit 

of estimated duties, at the PRC-wide rate 

of 112.64 percent, for any entries of 

tissue paper not accompanied by this 

certification in Appendix II of this 

notice. 

Concurrent and Future Administrative 

Reviews 

Because we have reached a final 

affirmative determination of 

circumvention, as stipulated in the 

Preliminary Determination, 73 FR at 

21587, with respect to Quijiang, we are 

expanding the period of review for the 

third administrative review, initiated on 

April 25, 2008 date, back to September 

5, 2006, the date of initiation of the 

circumvention inquiry, to include all of 

Quijiang’s entries covered by this 

determination. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 73 FR 22337, (April 

25, 2008). In concordance with this 

finding of circumvention, the review 

period of that segment of the proceeding 

will be expanded as of the date of 

issuance of this final determination with 

respect to Quijiang’s entries. In 

accordance with the certifications 

provided to CBP by Quijiang, all 

certified entries are subject to 

verification by the Department, 

including those that entered into the 

United States during the expanded third 

administrative review. In conducting a 

review of these certified entries, the 

Department will examine all records 

Quijiang maintains in its normal course 

of business supporting its certifications 

that no PRC-origin jumbo rolls were 

used in the production of Vietnameseorigin tissue paper products. Consistent 

with the terms of the certifications 

submitted by Quijiang, if Quijiang elects 

not to participate in the administrative 

review or does not consent to 

verification of these certified entries, we 

will immediately revoke the 

certification program and instruct CBP 

to suspend liquidation and collect cash 

deposits at the PRC-wide rate of 112.64 

percent on all of Quijiang’s entries of 

tissue paper, regardless of country of 

origin. 

Notice to Parties 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to the 

administrative protective orders 

(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with section 351.305 

of the Department’s regulations. Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

This affirmative final circumvention 

determination is published in 

accordance with section 781(b) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.225. 

Dated: September 19, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Total Adverse Facts Available 

(‘‘AFA’’) for Quijiang 

Comment 2: Clerical Error in Value-Added 

Calculation 

Comment 3: Cash Deposits and Suspension 

of Liquidation 

Appendix II 

Certification of Vietnam Quijiang Paper Co., 

Ltd. 

lllllllllllllllllllll

Certification to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection 

1. Vietnam Quijiang Paper Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Vietnam Quijiang’’) hereby certifies that the 

certain tissue paper products being exported 

and subject to this certification were not 

produced from Chinese origin jumbo rolls. 

2. By signing this certificate, Vietnam 

Quijiang also hereby agrees to maintain 

sufficient documentation supporting the 

above statement such as country of origin 

certificates for all jumbo rolls used to process 

the exported certain tissue paper products. 

Further, Vietnam Quijiang agrees to submit to 

verification of the underlying documentation 

supporting the above statement. Vietnam 

Quijiang agrees that failure to submit to 

verification of the documentation supporting 

these statements will result in immediate 

revocation of certification rights and that 

Vietnam Quijiang will be required to post a 

cash deposit equal to the China-wide entity 

rate on all entries of certain tissue paper 

products. In addition, if the Department of 

Commerce identifies any misrepresentation 

or inconsistencies regarding the 

certifications, Vietnam Quijiang recognizes 

that the matter may be reported to the U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection by the 

Department for possible enforcement action. 

Signature: 

Printed Name: 

Title: 

[FR Doc. E8–22715 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–851] 

Dynamic Random Access Memory 

Semiconductors From the Republic of 

Korea: Final Results of Sunset Review 

and Revocation of Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the notice of initiation of the 

five-year sunset review of the 

countervailing duty order on dynamic 

random access memory semiconductors 

(‘‘DRAMS’’) from the Republic of Korea 

(‘‘ROK’’), pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’). Because the domestic interested 

party did not file a substantive response 

by the applicable deadline and has 

withdrawn its notice of intent to 

participate in this sunset review, the 

Department is revoking this 

countervailing duty order. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 11, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shane Subler or David Neubacher, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189 or 

(202) 482–5823, respectively. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES