alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James ZELLER (Employee), Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, Inc. (Employer), Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. (Carrier), and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Jan. 28, 1955.

*617Frank E. Freeman, Miami, for petitioner.

Rosemond & Gunn, Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford & Williams, Miami, Rodney Durrance and Burnis T. Coleman, Tallahassee, for respondents.

SEBRING, Justice.

The petitioner, an employee, filed a petition for certiorari in this Court to review an order of the full commission in a workmen’s compensation proceeding. The employer moved to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the petition was not filed “within sixty days from the date the order sought to be reviewed was entered.” See Wilson v. McCoy Manufacturing Co., Fla., 69 So.2d 659.

As appears from the record, the sixtieth day after the entry of the order sought to be reviewed was Sunday, January 9, 1955. The petitioner filed his petition on Monday, January 10, 1955. In Carlile v. Spofford, Fla., 65 So.2d 545, this Court held, with Justices Thomas and Sebring dissenting, that where the sixtieth day after the entry of a final decree happened to fall on a Sunday, a notice of appeal which was filed the following Monday was sufficient to vest this Court with jurisdiction to review the final decree appealed from.

If the rule enunciated in Carlile v. Spof-ford, supra, is to remain the rule of this Court respecting the time within which an appeal may be taken from a final judgment or decree, we can think of no sound reason why the rule should not be extended so as to apply to constitutional certiorari proceedings to review compensation orders under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F. S.A. § 440.01 et seq.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the petition for certiorari on the ground that it was filed on the sixty-first day from the date the order sought to be reviewed was entered, instead of on the sixtieth day, which fell on a Sunday, should be denied.

It is so ordered.

MATHEWS, C. J., and TERRELL and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward A. Hjerpe III, Chief Financial Officer, certify to the best of my
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
               the Report.


                                      /s/ Edward A. Hjerpe III
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
                                      Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                                      August 13, 2002




                                       1
September 22, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RUSSELL SINGLETON LEONARD, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00560-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 11

                 TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
         (Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED                    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     ------------------------------------  -----------------------------------
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,      SEPTEMBER 30,      SEPTEMBER 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                           2000               1999              2000               1999
                                                     -----------------  -----------------  ----------------  -----------------

<S>                                                        <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>
Net income (loss)                                             $(1,480)              $149           $(7,325)           $(4,114)
                                                     =================  =================  ================  =================

                                                                       NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC

Weighted average common shares - Basic                     13,731,297         12,946,624        12,997,555         12,946,624
                                                     =================  =================  ================  =================

Net income (loss) per share - Basic                            $(0.11)             $0.01            $(0.56)            $(0.32)
                                                     =================  =================  ================  =================

                                                                      NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
Shares used in this computation:
  Weighted average common shares - Basic                   13,731,297         12,946,624        12,997,555         12,946,624
  Dilutive effect of shares under employee stock
    plans                                                           -            256,506                 -                  -
                                                    -----------------  -----------------  ----------------  -----------------
  Weighted average common shares - Diluted                 13,731,297         13,203,130        12,997,555         12,946,624
                                                     =================  =================  ================  ================

Net income (loss) per share - Diluted                          $(0.11)             $0.01            $(0.56)            $(0.32)
                                                     =================  =================  ================  ================
</TABLE>


                                                                         Page 18
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**WRITTEN CERTIFICATION of**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, Jana Ahlfinger Bell hereby certifies as follows: 

(1) She is the dulyappointed Chief Financial Officer of EFJ, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 

(2) Based on her knowledge, the Company’s Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of this third day of August, 2006.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Maria C . Rosario

Criminal No . 07-cr-252-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

52) filed by defendant is granted . As counsel for co-defendant

Eduardo K . Fernandez-Avalos has assented to this motion, trial is

also continued as to co-defendant Fernandez-Avalos .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : October 16, 200 8

cc : Mark Irish, Esq .

Martin Leppo, Esq .

Paul Twomey, Esq .

Marcie Vaughan, Esq .

Steven Gordon, Esq .

William Christie, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00252-JD Document 54 Filed 10/16/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-23-01-SM

Denis Frigon,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Frigon’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no. 

12). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of July 2008. Defendant Frigon

shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than June 13, 2008. On the

filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00023-SM Document 13 Filed 06/02/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference/Change of Plea Hearing is scheduled for 

July 1, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. 

Jury selection will take place on July 8, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 2, 2008

cc: Jessica Brown, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00023-SM Document 13 Filed 06/02/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,503
<INVENTORY>                                     49,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,205
<PP&E>                                          79,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,468)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 409,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,812
<BONDS>                                        212,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   409,089
<SALES>                                         22,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,980
<CGS>                                           16,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   339
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,258)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Andrew Frost

v. Case No. 08-cv-193-PB

United States of America

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 9, Motion for Certificate of

Appealability

Ruling: Frost’s petition rehashes arguments that I resolved

when I dismissed his first § 2255 petition. Precedent supports the

government's position that Frost cannot circumvent the need to

petition the Court of Appeals before proceeding with what is in

effect a second § 2255 petition. Reasonable jurists would not

disagree with these conclusions. Motion denied. 

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

Date: September 19, 2008

cc: Andrew Frost, Esq.

 Aixa Maldonado Quinones, AUSA

Case 1:08-cv-00193-PB Document 10 Filed 09/19/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             123
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   123
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (708)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       335 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,227)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, 1

JJ.

NO. SCWC-29732

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

FRANK SANES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 29732; CR. NO. 05-1-2537)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., for the court )

1

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Frank Sanes’ application

for writ of certiorari filed on March 16, 2011, is hereby

rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 27, 2011.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

Chief Justice

Walter R. Schoettle for 

petitioner/defendantappellant on the 

application.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29732

27-APR-2011

02:56 PM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                           


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         271,138
<SECURITIES>                                    17,070
<RECEIVABLES>                                  363,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (27,851)
<INVENTORY>                                    247,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               937,891
<PP&E>                                       2,549,672
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,148,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,904,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          414,977
<BONDS>                                        751,151
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       775,739
<OTHER-SE>                                     639,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,904,797
<SALES>                                      2,448,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,448,205
<CGS>                                        1,798,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,798,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                379,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.24
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         513,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,045,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    339,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,064,000
<PP&E>                                       1,009,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 233,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,463,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          684,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,887,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,447,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,463,000
<SALES>                                      4,877,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,877,000
<CGS>                                        3,234,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,193,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,336,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,336,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civ. No. 1:07-cv-00060-PB

EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, ETAL., )

)

Defendants. )

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civ. No. 1:07-cv-00080-PB

EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, ET AL., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION

The matter having come before the Court on the United States' Motion to Consolidate

Related Actions, and the Court having considered the supporting papers,

IT IS this day of , 2007,

ORDERED that:

1. The United States' Motion to Consolidate Related Actions is Granted;

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), the above cases are consolidated for all purposes.

3. Civil case number 1:07-cv-00060-PB shall be designated as the main case.

Henceforth, these consolidated cases shall be considered as one case and all pleadings will be

filed in the main case and captioned with that case number. The certificate of service shall

Case 1:07-cv-00060-WES Document 12-5 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 2
indicate copies to all counsel in the main case which shall now include all counsel in the former

related case.

4. The former related case shall be statistically closed.

5. Parties in the former related case will be added to the main case as consolidated

plaintiff/defendants, if applicable.

6. The United States shall serve copies of this order on all counsel of record in the main

and former cases.

United States District Judge

2

Case 1:07-cv-00060-WES Document 12-5 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K into the following Registration Statements of
Lafarge Corporation previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission: (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 2-92414, (ii)
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-9813, (iii) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-32645, (iv) Registration Statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-32644 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (v) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-20865, (vi) Registration Statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-46093 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 of
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (vii) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-51873, (viii) Registration Statement on Form
S-8, File No. 333-65897, (ix) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No.
333-65899, and (x) Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-57333. 

                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 26, 1999