alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-214-01-JD

Beverly Starr Dove

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

10) filed by defendant is granted. This is the second continuance.

Trial is rescheduled for August. No further continuances. 

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within

10 days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: June 12, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00214-JD Document 11 Filed 06/12/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1366

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 3101 West

Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Ms. SANCHEZ (for herself, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr.

CONDIT, Mr. FARR of California, Mr. BACA, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. COX, Mr.

WAXMAN, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. FILNER, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MATSUI, and Mr. HONDA) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government

Reform

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HECTOR G. GODINEZ POST

4 OFFICE BUILDING.

5 The United States Post Office building located at

6 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California,
2

•HR 1366 IH

1 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

2 Post Office Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

6 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

7 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

8 Post Office Building’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James Sloman,

v. Civil No. 06-377-JL

Presstek, Inc. et al,

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

February 21, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:06-cv-00377-JL Document 52 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

February 15, 2008

cc: Mark L. Mallory, Esq.

Matthew L. Tuccillo, Esq.

Theodore M. Hess-Mahan, Esq.

Thomas G. Shapiro, Esq.

Douglas P. Baumstein, Esq.

Glenn M. Kurtz, Esq.

Gregory M. Starner, Esq.

Peter C. Callaghan, Esq.

Peter D. Anderson, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00377-JL Document 52 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 15

                           Accountants' Acknowledgment


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:      Registration Statements Numbers 333-26819 and 333-26827 on Form S-8

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness  of the use therein of our report  dated July 15, 1997  related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.






/S/  KPMG Peat Marwick


New York, New York
August 8, 1997
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1992...... 83.7 23.6 6.7 24.6 2.9 26.0 6.2 8.0 16.8 52.8 1993...... 92.6 28.7 6.2 24.7 2.5 30.6 6.1 8.3 17.1 61.0 1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2001: Q1... 54.3 3.6 4.3 23.7 4.7 18.0 3.3 5.7 13.9 31.4  Q2... 58.0 4.1 5.5 25.9 6.7 15.9 4.8 7.1 14.1 32.1  Q3... 38.6 4.1 3.5 17.7 2.8 10.5 3.7 5.3 10.2 19.5  Q4... 55.6 8.4 5.6 19.4 2.4 19.8 3.2 5.6 12.5 34.3 2002: Q1... 58.5 6.5 5.4 28.5 3.4 14.7 3.3 5.8 16.1 33.2  Q2... 57.9 4.7 5.0 33.1 2.5 12.6 5.3 7.9 15.3 29.4  Q3... 56.4 3.3 4.1 29.4 4.3 15.3 4.3 6.0 12.7 33.4  Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9  Q2... 44.4 4.9 3.8 22.9 4.3 8.4 4.0 5.4 13.1 21.9  Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Q4... 55.2 11.1 6.0 24.1 2.9 11.1 3.3 5.4 14.6 31.9 2004: Q1... 72.2 5.2 5.4 39.7 6.7 15.1 3.1 5.0 14.9 49.1  Q2... 60.2 3.8 4.7 30.2 3.9 17.6 4.0 6.5 13.0 36.7  Q3... 54.2 2.3 7.3 21.1 5.9 17.6 3.5 5.3 10.3 35.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

October 30, 2020

Order 

Clerk

October 30, 2020

158852(110)

DETROIT ALLIANCE AGAINST THE RAIN

TAX, DETROIT IRON & METAL COMPANY,

AMERICAN IRON & METAL COMPANY,

McNICHOLS SCRAP IRON & METAL

COMPANY, MONIER KHALIL LIVING TRUST,

and BAGLEY PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 158852

v COA: 339176

CITY OF DETROIT, DETROIT WATER AND

SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT and DETROIT 

BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees to file a response 

to the brief amicus curiae filed by Kickham Hanley is GRANTED. The response submitted 

on October 29, 2020, is accepted for filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-46-01-SM

Steven Hall

O R D E R

Defendant Hall’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 13). Trial has been rescheduled for the November 2006

trial period. Defendant Hall shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than October 10, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: November 2, 2006 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: November 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00046-SM Document 14 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 2, 2006

cc: Thomas McCue, Esq.

Clyde R.W. Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00046-SM Document 14 Filed 10/02/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of Manchester  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Elan Yaish,  Vice  President-Finance,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  to the best of my  knowledge,  pursuant  to Rule  13a-14(b)  under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:   June 10, 2005           /S/  Elan Yaish
                               -----------------
                               Elan Yaish
                               Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer
                               and Principal Accounting Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1725

To authorize an annual Federal contribution to the District of Columbia

to reimburse the District for the costs incurred in providing public

safety services for demonstrations and other activities which occur in

the District of Columbia because the District is the seat of the Federal

Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. FATTAH, and Mrs. MORELLA) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To authorize an annual Federal contribution to the District

of Columbia to reimburse the District for the costs incurred in providing public safety services for demonstrations and other activities which occur in the District

of Columbia because the District is the seat of the Federal Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 Public Safety Reimbursement Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1725 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF ANNUAL FEDERAL CONTRIBU2 TION TO REIMBURSE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

3 FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC SAFETY COSTS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro5 priated to the District of Columbia for fiscal year 2002

6 and each succeeding fiscal year a contribution towards the

7 costs incurred by the District of Columbia in the previous

8 fiscal year in providing public safety and related services

9 during demonstrations and other events which occur in the

10 District of Columbia because the District is the seat of

11 the Federal Government.

12 (b) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT OF CONTRIBU13 TION.—The amount of a contribution made under sub14 section (a) shall be based on receipts and other materials

15 and information presented by the Chief Financial Officer

16 of the District of Columbia to the Subcommittees on the

17 District of Columbia of the Committees on Appropriations

18 of the House of Representatives and Senate.

Æ
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 30, 2003
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending February 29, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
R. Royall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 1, 2004


/S/Richard R. Royall
Richard R. Royall,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934



I, Mark Thoenes, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kaival Brands Innovations Group,
Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: February 25, 2022 | By: | /s/ Mark Thoenes               
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------
|                        |     | Mark Thoenes                   
|                        |     | Interim Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 07-cv-60

ExxonMobil Corporation, et al.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

By statute, a financial interest in a party, however slight

(i.e., even one share), results in disqualification. As I have a

financial interest in defendants ExxonMobil Corporation and

General Electric Company, Inc., recusal is mandatory. See,

28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4). 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

April 20, 2007

cc: Jeffrey K. Sands, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00060-WES Document 9 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.0

WRITTEN CERTIFICATION of

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned,
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of EFJ, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to the best of each of their knowledge that:

(1) the Companys Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ Michael E. JalbertMichael E. JalbertChief Executive OfficerMay 2, 2006/S/ Jana Ahlfinger BellJana Ahlfinger BellChief Financial OfficerMay 2, 2006


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In re: D & D Cabinets, Inc. Chapter 7

Case #: 13-12449-BAH

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF

CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING

SKINNER, RIVARD & SIEKMANN, PLLC TO TURNOVER RECORDS

NOW COMES, Mark P. Cornell, Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of the above captioned 

debtor, and Withdraws the Chapter 7 Trustee’s Motion for Order Compelling Skinner, Rivard & 

Siekmann, PLLC, to Turnover Records.

Respectfully Submitted

Dated: July 15, 2014 /S/ Mark P. Cornell 

Mark P. Cornell, Esq.

Chapter 7 Trustee

2 Greenwood Ave.

Concord, NH 03301

(603) 225-9900

Certificate of Service

I, Mark P. Cornell, hereby certify that on July 15, 2014, I served copies of this pleading 

upon all parties appearing electronically in accordance with LBR 5005-4 and upon: 

Skinner, Rivard & Siekmann, PLLC 

587 Union Street

Manchester, NH 03104

/S/ Mark P. Cornell 

Mark P. Cornell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-226-02-PB

Robert McFadden, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

April 1, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time as counsel will be engaged in a several week

trial which conflicts with the trial scheduled in this case. 

The government and all co-defendants do not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 1, 2008 to June 3, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00226-PB Document 98 Filed 03/10/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The March 27, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

May 21, 2008 at 4:15 p.m. 

No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 10, 2008

cc: David Bownes, Esq.

Mark Irish, Esq.

Robert Rabuck, Esq.

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Richard Johnston, Esq.

Dana Cole, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00226-PB Document 98 Filed 03/10/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-22-PB

Linda D. Bevins

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for December 2, 2008, citing the need for

additional time to allow defendant to undergo necessary medical

procedures and to engage in plea negotiations or prepare for

trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 2, 2008 to February 3, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00022-PB Document 16 Filed 11/17/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The November 17, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 21, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 17, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00022-PB Document 16 Filed 11/17/08 Page 2 of 2