alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GREMILLION et al. v. DAIGREPONT et al.

*No.*7407.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1950.

. Coco & Bennett, Marksyille, for appellants. ■

■’ Earl Edwards, Marksville, for appellees.

*627TALIAFERRO, Judge. ■

The record in this case is incomplete. The note of evidence is not therein, and without same judgment by this Court cannot be pronounced. Also, the record is not certified to by the Clerk of Court.

For said reasons the record will be returned to the Lower Court for completion in the respects mentioned, and promptly thereafter be returned to this Court. And, it is so ordered.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-8-01/02-SM

Melissa Allen

Michael Guinier

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 32) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the September 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 29, 2007. On the filing of such waiver,

her continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:07-cr-00008-SM Document 33 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 21, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Jennifer C. Davis, Esq.

 Glenn Geiger, Esq.

 Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00008-SM Document 33 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2
|   | 1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July      16, 2010 | By:    | s/ Mitchell E. Appel               |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Mitchell      E. Appel             |
|                                |   | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|                                |   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
|   | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |   |                  |                                                                               |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   |                  |
| Date: July 31, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR |
|                |   |   |                  | Ronald J. BuschurPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPowerwave Technologies, Inc. |
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 14 - 00400 - CR

CHRISTOPHER LOVERNE HALL APPELLANTS
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 372ND DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1352 298D

---------- 

### MEMORA NDUM OPINION 1

---------- On September 15, 2014 , the trial court revoked appellant Christopher Loverne Hall’s community supervision, adjudicated his guilt for forgery by possession of a check with intent to pass, and sentenced him to eight months in state j ail. Also on September 15, 2014 , the trial court entered its certification of

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 defendant’s right to appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The certification states that “the defendant has waived the right to appeal. ” On September 19, 2014, appellant fi led a pro se notice of appeal. On September 24, 2014, we notified appellant and his trial counsel that the certification indicating that he had waived the right to appeal had been filed in this court and that this appeal could be dismissed unless he or an y party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. No response has been filed. Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows that appellant has waived the right to appeal, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Hill v. State , 929 S.W.2d 607, 609 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1996, no pet.)

.

PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERE D: November 13, 2014
| date    | Corporate Equity | Real Estate | Debt Securities | Other |
|---------|------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------|
| 2015:Q1 | 0.47             | 0.44        | 0.13            | 0.65  |
| 2015:Q2 | 0.07             | 0.52        | -0.17           | 0.36  |
| 2015:Q3 | -1.99            | 0.45        | 0.31            | 0.24  |
| 2015:Q4 | 1.01             | 0.32        | -0.28           | 0.44  |
| 2016:Q1 | 0.23             | 0.25        | 0.24            | 0.44  |
| 2016:Q2 | 0.55             | 0.65        | 0.23            | 0.3   |
| 2016:Q3 | 0.75             | 0.61        | -0.05           | 0.37  |
| 2016:Q4 | 0.4              | 0.43        | -0.42           | 0.15  |
| 2017:Q1 | 1.43             | 0.38        | 0.1             | 0.46  |
| 2017:Q2 | 0.79             | 0.74        | 0.22            | 0.41  |
| 2017:Q3 | 0.96             | 0.47        | 0.04            | 0.23  |
| 2017:Q4 | 1.58             | 0.46        | 0.1             | 0.37  |
| 2018:Q1 | -0.24            | 0.67        | 0.09            | 0.52  |
| 2018:Q2 | 0.49             | 0.43        | 0.17            | 0.22  |
| 2018:Q3 | 1.37             | 0.38        | 0.29            | 0.01  |
| 2018:Q4 | -4.5             | 0.25        | 0.07            | 0.35  |
| 2019:Q1 | 4.23             | 0.64        | 0.34            | 1.01  |
| 2019:Q2 | 0.91             | 0.54        | 0.48            | 0.32  |
| 2019:Q3 | -0.18            | 0.28        | 0.19            | 0.42  |
| 2019:Q4 | 2.43             | 0.34        | 0               | 0.64  |
| 2020:Q1 | -7.86            | 0.71        | -0.4            | 1.42  |
| 2020:Q2 | 5.79             | 0.68        | -0.03           | 1.41  |
| 2020:Q3 | 2.88             | 0.86        | 0.11            | 0.66  |
| 2020:Q4 | 5.72             | 1.08        | 0.28            | 1.2   |
| 2021:Q1 | 2.79             | 1.36        | -0.54           | 1.46  |
| 2021:Q2 | 3.34             | 2.34        | 0.16            | 0.73  |
| 2021:Q3 | 0.08             | 2           | 0.18            | 1.12  |
| 2021:Q4 | 1.95             | 0.9         | -0.24           | 1.19  |
| 2022:Q1 | -2.06            | 3.61        | -0.24           | 0.8   |
| 2022:Q2 | -7.75            | 2.32        | -0.32           | 0.2   |
| 2022:Q3 | -1.77            | -1.25       | 0.25            | -0.5  |
| 2022:Q4 | 2.24             | -0.97       | 0.73            | -0.9  |
| 2023:Q1 | 2.31             | -0.11       | 0.82            | -0.12 |
| 2023:Q2 | 2.55             | 2.25        | 0.2             | 0.27  |
| 2023:Q3 | -1.7             | 0.43        | -0.03           | -0.11 |
| 2023:Q4 | 4.7              | -0.59       | 0.69            | 0.04  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,987,915              10,987,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              152,379,847             152,379,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,583,767               3,583,767
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           159,783,995             159,783,995
<PP&E>                                         439,751                 439,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                 143,549                 143,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,160,613             165,160,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       82,820,990              82,820,990
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        96,650                  96,650
<OTHER-SE>                                  82,242,973              82,242,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,160,613             165,160,613
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,841,265              10,758,997
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,422,901               3,289,384
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               250,000                 400,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,968,569               3,101,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,199,795               3,967,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                   749,956               1,397,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,449,839               2,570,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,449,839               2,570,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21                     .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21                     .38
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David Jerome Clough, Jr.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-114-JL

NH State Prison, Warden

O R D E R

The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The petitioner has not shown

that reasonable jurists could debate whether the petition should have been resolved in a different

manner, that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, or

otherwise made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).

SO ORDERED.

June 14, 2010 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: David J. Clough, Jr., Pro se

Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00114-JL Document 23 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 1
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2000: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 1 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 2 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 3 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 4 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 5 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 6 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 7 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 8 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM   Document 41   Filed 03/18/08   Page 9 of 9
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 24, 2009

s0217

Order 

February 24, 2009

136376

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellant,

v SC: 136376

COA: 272930

Genesee CC: 05-081070-CK

HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Cross- Plaintiff,

and

SHANNON PITCHER, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of PERCY FRANK, Deceased,

and EDGAR FRANK, d/b/a GBS CEMENT & 

BLOCK,

Defendants/Cross-Defendants- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
111 South 18th Plaza, Suite 1152, Omaha, NE 68102-1322

Omaha: (402) 661-7350 Fax: (402) 661-7387 Toll Free: (866) 220-4381

Lincoln: (402) 437-1900 Fax: (402) 437-1911 Toll Free: (866) 220-4379

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Denise M. Lucks OFFICE OF THE CLERK Gabriela Acosta

Clerk of Court www.ned.uscourts.gov Chief Deputy Clerk

TO: The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon

FROM: Clerk, United States District Court

DATE: November 27, 2023

SUBJECT: 4:23CV3099 Tyler v. Social Security Administration

You are receiving this memorandum because a non-prisoner filed a notice of appeal in 

this civil case and the clerk’s office cannot process the appeal to the Eighth Circuit until 

either the appellate filing fee is paid or the question of the non-prisoner’s authorization 

to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is resolved.1

In order to assist the clerk’s office in its processing of this appeal, please mark the 

appropriate box:

☒ No separate order will be entered because the appealing party is entitled to proceed 

on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of 

the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

☐ A separate order or further proceedings will be required to address the appealing 

party’s authorization to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk’s office ☐ is ☐ is not 

directed to set a 30-day case management deadline checking on the status of the 

processing of this appeal.

1 The purpose of this memorandum is to assist in the timely processing of this appeal by notifying 

you that one or more issues may require your attention before the clerk’s office can process the appeal. 

Please feel free to disregard this memorandum if the issue or issues raised will be addressed by a 

separate order.

4:23-cv-03099-JFB-PRSE Doc # 23 Filed: 11/27/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 61
Case 1:05-cv-00310-SM Document 5 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 1
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1993...... 92.6 28.7 6.2 24.7 2.5 30.6 6.1 8.3 17.1 61.0 1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2001: Q2... 58.0 4.1 5.5 25.9 6.7 15.9 4.8 7.1 14.1 32.1  Q3... 38.6 4.1 3.5 17.7 2.8 10.5 3.7 5.3 10.2 19.5  Q4... 55.6 8.4 5.6 19.4 2.4 19.8 3.2 5.6 12.5 34.3 2002: Q1... 58.5 6.5 5.4 28.5 3.4 14.7 3.3 5.8 16.1 33.2  Q2... 57.9 4.7 5.0 33.1 2.5 12.6 5.3 7.9 15.3 29.4  Q3... 56.4 3.3 4.1 29.4 4.3 15.3 4.3 6.0 12.7 33.4  Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9  Q2... 44.4 4.9 3.8 22.9 4.3 8.4 4.0 5.4 13.1 21.9  Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Q4... 55.2 11.1 6.0 24.1 2.9 11.1 3.3 5.4 14.6 31.9 2004: Q1... 72.2 5.2 5.4 39.7 6.7 15.1 3.1 5.0 14.9 49.1  Q2... 60.2 3.8 4.7 30.2 3.9 17.6 4.0 6.5 13.0 36.7  Q3... 54.2 2.3 7.3 21.1 5.9 17.6 3.5 5.3 10.3 35.1  Q4... 71.0 12.6 9.2 28.6 7.4 13.2 2.6 4.8 14.7 48.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-135-01-SM

David Burns

O R D E R

Defendant Burns’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 17). Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2008 trial

period. No further continuances absent extraordinary circumstances.

Defendant Burns shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than June 9,

2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: September 26, 2008 at 11:00 a.m.

Jury Selection: October 7, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00135-SM Document 19 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 27, 2008

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00135-SM Document 19 Filed 05/27/08 Page 2 of 2