alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC.a Delaware Corporation

Transcrypt
International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies as follows:

1.    Article 1
of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is amended to read in full as follows:

"The
name of the Corporation is EFJ, Inc."

2.    That
said amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with Sections 242 and 222 of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL") by:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, said TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Michael E. Jalbert and R. Andrew Massey, its President and
Corporate Secretary, respectively.

| |  | /s/MICHAEL E. JALBERTMichael E. Jalbert, President      
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/R. ANDREW MASSEYR. Andrew Massey, Corporate Secretary

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 11, 2004



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 11, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Wachovia Securities, LLC

v. Civil No. 08-cv-251

Richard T. Iannacone, et al

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case.

 SO ORDERED.

June 30, 2008 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Anthony Paduano, Esq.

Jeanne P. Herrick, Esq.

Eric D. Brandfonbrener, Esq.

Jeffrey C. Spear, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00251-MML Document 21 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 1
31

C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Demand for loans Funds availability Loan repayment rate Renewals or extensions Coll

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower 

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2001: Q2... 23 48 29 13 65 22 31 65 4 4 60 36 0  Q3... 28 54 18 8 57 35 21 72 7 8 70 22 1  Q4... 23 52 24 6 60 34 33 59 8 7 59 34 0 2002: Q1... 19 55 27 10 62 28 38 57 4 6 55 39 0  Q2... 21 52 26 7 66 27 32 65 3 4 65 31 0  Q3... 25 51 24 8 61 31 30 64 6 6 64 30 1  Q4... 23 52 25 6 58 36 29 55 16 14 60 25 0 2003: Q1... 22 46 31 6 57 36 31 60 9 7 61 31 1  Q2... 24 53 23 4 54 42 22 71 6 6 70 24 1 

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2001: Q2... 14 62 25 17 65 17 26 72 2 2 76 22 1  Q3... 19 63 18 11 61 28 21 76 3 4 78 19 0  Q4... 21 61 19 9 63 27 24 70 6 6 73 21 1 2002: Q1... 19 63 18 8 69 24 30 67 4 4 71 25 0  Q2... 15 60 25 11 73 16 34 64 2 3 63 34 0  Q3... 18 58 24 10 72 18 40 57 4 2 59 39 0  Q4... 20 56 24 8 69 23 38 54 8 1 58 41 0 2003: Q1... 21 52 26 5 71 24 49 48 4 1 50 48 0  Q2... 19 58 23 5 67 28 27 64 10 6 67 27 0 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2001: Q2... 22 55 23 10 69 21 27 66 7 7 62 31 0  Q3... 27 55 18 10 68 22 18 77 5 8 75 17 0  Q4... 24 58 18 8 69 23 28 61 11 7 68 25 1 2002: Q1... 25 60 16 9 72 20 24 70 6 8 68 25 0  Q2... 35 54 11 6 72 22 25 70 5 8 69 23 0  Q3... 24 61 15 10 71 19 22 72 7 8 73 18 0  Q4... 22 61 16 6 74 20 21 69 10 7 73 20 0 2003: Q1... 25 63 12 6 68 26 19 73 8 8 73 19 0  Q2... 19 66 15 3 70 27 15 75 10 8 77 15 0 
32

C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year Earlier (continued)Percent

Demand for loans Funds availability Loan repayment rate Renewals or extensions Coll

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2001: Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. 14 62 24 15 72 12 6 71 23 2  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. 13 58 30 15 77 8 13 76 11 0  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 49 49 17 74 9 3 79 18 0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. 27 73 0 6 55 39 35 59 6 25  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. 10 72 19 33 64 4 2 60 38 0  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. 8 77 15 33 62 6 3 66 31 0  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. 6 64 31 28 56 16 13 57 30 0 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. 5 69 26 34 52 14 10 60 30 1  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 76 21 20 73 7 7 69 24 1 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2001: Q2... 24 70 6 3 76 21 15 85 0 6 82 12 0  Q3... 40 56 4 0 56 44 4 92 4 8 84 8 4  Q4... 29 61 11 4 64 32 11 86 4 7 79 14 0 2002: Q1... 23 73 3 7 63 30 7 93 0 0 97 3 0  Q2... 30 60 10 10 67 23 10 90 0 3 93 3 3  Q3... 41 52 7 19 59 22 30 70 0 11 70 19 11  Q4... 24 62 14 5 67 29 38 62 0 0 67 33 0 2003: Q1... 36 55 9 5 68 27 27 73 0 5 77 18 0  Q2... 27 73 0 5 62 33 23 77 0 9 68 23 9  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>     0001023519                        
<NAME>    Miami Computer Supply Corporation          
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                        282,016
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,218,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                    6,000
<INVENTORY>                                 5,520,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           13,696,882
<PP&E>                                      1,524,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                920,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             15,117,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      11,435,732
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,544,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               15,117,868
<SALES>                                    44,070,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           44,070,003
<CGS>                                      35,943,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              42,284,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              225,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            243,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,560,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                  647,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           912,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  912,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.38
        


</TABLE>
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1983
          1
          1
          2
          3
          71984
          3
          7
          10
          12
          321985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 30, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION ,

Plaintiff,

V .

ZIPHER LTD.

and

VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC .,

Defendants.

Civil Action No . 1 :07-CV-00006-PB

(Consolidated Action)

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AND RELIEF RELATED TO

ISSUES OF WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT AND OWNERSHI P

After considering the parties' Motion for Order Dismissing Claims and Relief Related to

Issues of Willful Infringement and Ownership, the Court is of the opinion that said motion

should be GRANTED .

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that :

1 . Plaintiff Markem-Imaje Corporation's ("Markem's") claims and allegations that

Markem owns or otherwise has rights in the '572 patent, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice,

including COUNTS I, II, and V of Markem's First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury

Trial, filed August 17, 2007, the relief requested in paragraphs A, B, C, D, E, and H of the Prayer

for Relief of the First Amended Complaint, and as alleged in paragraphs 12, 16, and 17 of the

First Amended Complaint, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees ;

I
2 . Defendants Zipher Ltd.'s and Videojet Technologies, Inc .'s claims and allegations

that Markem willfully infringed and willfully infringes the '572 patent are hereby DISMISSED

with prejudice, including as alleged in paragraph 15 of Defendants' Answer to First Amended

Complaint and Affirmative Defenses, Amended Counterclaim, and Jury Demand, filed

September 10, 2007 where Defendants Counterclaim for Infringement of the '572 patent, and

including the relief requested in paragraph I of their Prayer for Relief in Defendants' Answer to

First Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses, Amended Counterclaim, and Jury Demand,

filed September 10, 2007, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees.

Dated: June 9, 2009

cc ; Cmunsel of Record

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbador o

United States District Judge

2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anil Kumar GUPTA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-10348, 02-10370.

D.C. Nos. CR-01-00220-PMP, CR-02-00085-PMP/PAL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 18, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Anil Kumar Gupta appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to two counts of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) in District Court Case No. CR-02-085PMP(PAL) and one count of conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371) in District Court Case No. CR-01-220-PMP(RJJ). . Gupta contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure due to the harshness of conditions under which Gupta was forced to live while a federal detainee at the North Las Vegas Detention Center. We lack jurisdiction because Gupta knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. *United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000).

These appeals are DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
SEQUA CORPORATION



	
Exhibit 10.47

	 
	 
	 
	 
	
Sequa Corporation

	 
	
Amendment No. 1 to 

	 
	
Management Incentive Bonus Program

	 
	
for

	 
	
Corporate Executive Officers

	 
	 
	
(Amendment Effective March 25, 2004)




	
SEQUA CORPORATION

	
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE BONUS PROGRAM

	
FOR CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

	
AMENDMENT NO. 1

	 
	 	
This Amendment No. 1 is made by Sequa Corporation (the "Company") to

	 
	
the Sequa Corporation Management Incentive Bonus Program for Corporate Executive 

	 
	
Officers (the "Plan").

	 
	
WITNESSETH:

	 	
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan; and

	 	 
	 	
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to reflect a change in the 

	 
	
titles of two of the participants in the Plan; and

	 	 
	 	
WHEREAS, this amendment to the Plan does not and will not change the 

	 
	
number or pool of eligible participants in the Plan or otherwise substantively change any of 

	 
	
the terms of the Plan.

	 	 
	 	
NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of March 25, 2004, the Company hereby

	 
	
amends the Plan as follows:

	 
	 	
1.
	
The title "President/Chief Operating Officer" shall be replaced with "Vice 

	
Chairman and Executive Officer" in every instance in which it appears in the Plan.

	 
	 	
2.
	
The title "Senior Vice President/Gas Turbine Operations" shall be replaced

	
with "Vice Chairman and Executive Officer" in every instance in which it appears in the Plan.

	 	 
	 	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan is hereby 

	 
	
executed on this 25th day of March, 2004.

	 
	 	 	
SEQUA CORPORATION

	 	 
	 	 	
By: /s/ Jesse Battino

	 	 	
Jesse Battino

	 	 	
Vice President, Human Resources
avt_Ex4_1



		

			EXHIBIT 4.1

		


		

			 

		





		
			Description of Capital Stock
		

		
			The following is a brief description of the common stock, par value $1.00 per share (“common stock”), of Avnet, Inc. (the “Company”), which is the only security of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This description is not complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) and Bylaws, as amended through May 9, 2014 (“Bylaws”).  
		

		
			General
		

		
			The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company is authorized to issue up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share. As of June 29, 2019, 104,037,769 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid. The common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “AVT”.
		

		
			          The Certificate of Incorporation further provides that the Company is authorized to issue up to 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock, to be issued in series. For each series of preferred stock, the Board of Directors may fix the relative rights, preferences and limitations as between the shares of such series, the shares of other series of preferred stock, and the shares of common stock. As of June 29, 2019, no shares of preferred stock were outstanding.
		

		
			Non-Assessable
		

		
			The holders of common stock are not subject to further calls or assessments. 
		

		
			Voting Rights
		

		
			The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share at all meetings of shareholders. There are no cumulative voting rights. 
		

		
			Dividend Rights
		

		
			The holders of common stock have equal rights to dividends from funds legally available for the payment of dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors.  
		

		
			Liquidation Rights
		

		
			The holders of common stock are entitled, upon liquidation, to share ratably in any distribution in which holders of common stock participate.
		

		
			


		 





		

		
			No Redemptive, Conversion or Preemptive Rights
		

		
			The common stock is not redeemable or convertible. The holders of common stock do not have any preemptive rights to subscribe for, purchase or receive any shares of the Company’s stock. 
		

		
			Approval of Certain Business Combinations and Reorganizations
		

		
			          Any plan of merger or consolidation, any sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets not made in the usual or regular course of the Company’s business, or any plan for a binding share exchange requires approval by the Company’s shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo CONTRERAS-MONTOYA, also known as Gerardo Montoya-Contreras, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo Contreras-Montoya, also known as Arturo Lopez-Mansanero, also known as Juan Ibarra-Olvera, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-41341.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, Julia Bowen Stern, Assistant US Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Rudy Xavier Rodriguez, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

*439PER CURIAM.*

Gerardo Contreras-Montoya (Contreras) appeals his 2002 guilty-plea conviction for being found present in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and the revocation of supervised release *from his*2001 guilty-plea conviction for illegally entering the United States. Contreras’ guilty-plea to the 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) charge was taken by the magistrate judge and approved by the district court after Contreras gave his written consent. Contreras argues that his guilty plea and conviction are void because a Fed. R.Crim. P. 11 colloquy may never be delegated to a non-Article III magistrate judge. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent but raises it to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review.

We held in *United States v. Dees,*125 F.3d 261, 266-69 (5th Cir.1997), that 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) provides a magistrate judge with the statutory authority to conduct a Fed. R.Crim. P. 11 guilty plea proceeding and that this delegation of authority does not violate the Constitution. Therefore, Contreras’ argument is foreclosed, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.

The Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance and to waive the briefing requirement is GRANTED. The Government’s request to extend the briefing period is DENIED as unnecessary.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2002: Q2... 57.9 4.7 5.0 33.1 2.5 12.6 5.3 7.9 15.3 29.4  Q3... 56.4 3.3 4.1 29.4 4.3 15.3 4.3 6.0 12.7 33.4  Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9  Q2... 44.4 4.9 3.8 22.9 4.3 8.4 4.0 5.4 13.1 21.9  Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Q4... 55.2 11.1 6.0 24.1 2.9 11.1 3.3 5.4 14.6 31.9 2004: Q1... 72.2 5.2 5.4 39.7 6.7 15.1 3.1 5.0 14.9 49.1  Q2... 60.2 3.8 4.7 30.2 3.9 17.6 4.0 6.5 13.0 36.7  Q3... 54.2 2.3 7.3 21.1 5.9 17.6 3.5 5.3 10.3 35.1  Q4... 71.0 12.6 9.2 28.6 7.4 13.2 2.6 4.8 14.7 48.9 2005: Q1... 55.2 5.3 5.3 34.4 2.5 7.7 2.4 4.2 13.7 34.8  Q2... 76.6 7.7 3.7 29.9 11.0 24.3 3.8 5.9 12.7 54.1  Q3... 59.1 3.4 6.1 24.4 10.1 15.2 3.2 4.7 12.6 38.7  Q4... 46.4 10.2 5.5 18.8 3.2 8.7 2.2 4.1 11.0 29.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
LAW OFFICES 

WALKER & BUCHHOLZ 

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 

50 BRIDGE STREET, SUITE 205 

MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03101-1699 

JAMES G. WALKER PHONE (603) 634-5090 

KEVIN E. BUCHHOLZ FAX (603) 644-8811 

INTERNETkbuchholz@walkerbuchholz.com 

March 13, 2008 

John M. Safford, Clerk 

Hillsborough County Superior Court 

Northern District 

300 Chestnut Street 

Manchester, NH 03101-2490 

 Re: In the Matter of Pamela McCarthy and Ricky McCarthy

 Docket#: 06-M-0096 

 File#: 7916 

Dear Clerk Safford: 

Enclosed please find an Notice of Removal to Federal Court with the attached 

Plaintiff’s Petition For Removal and Civil Cover Sheet to be filed in the above captioned 

matter. 

 

 I hereby certify that a copy of this correspondence and the foregoing were this day mailed 

to Kathleen Sternenberg, Esq., Alan Cantor, GAL and Melissa Clickner.

 

 

Very truly yours, 

WALKER & BUCHHOLZ, P.A. 

By /s/ Kevin. E. Buchholz, Esq. 

Kevin E Buchholz, Esquire 

KEB/kan 

enclosure 

Cc: Ricky McCarthy 

 Kathleen Sternenberg, Esq. 

 Alan Cantor, GAL 

Melissa Clickner

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-3 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 1