alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, FPercent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rateVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 670,394 106,555 117,365 172,438 104,022 9,839 59,52Number of loans 18,629 2,750 4,000 5,316 1,749 351 66Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.47 16.98 18.61 21.31 32.04 51.89 21.0

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 10.00 7.94 5.86 11.82 15.80 18.94 9.0

Weighted average risk rating3 2.59 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.42 6.21 6.15 6.32 6.68 7.76 6.5

 Standard error5 .10 .36 .17 .22 .25 .42 .3 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.00 7.25 6.65 6.87 7.00 8.75 6.7 25th percentile 5.95 5.11 5.57 5.95 6.00 7.50 6.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.35 5.35 6.31 6.18 6.85 n.a. n.a Other livestock 6.93 4.89 n.a. 7.30 7.41 n.a. 7.6 Other current operating expenses7 6.38 6.51 6.03 6.25 6.60 7.76 6.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.48 5.87 6.25 6.80 7.10 n.a. 6.2 Farm real estate 6.24 4.93 6.30 6.46 6.27 n.a. 6.5 Other8 5.95 3.21 5.42 6.22 n.a. n.a. 4.1

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 43.23 43.21 72.01 27.34 30.07 67.54 37.9 Under commitment 50.88 69.73 60.75 69.00 15.06 36.75 6.5 Callable 28.97 27.07 14.16 38.49 23.80 19.17 4.6 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.33 10.24 2.75 4.50 .07 n.a. n.a Other livestock 8.62 3.53 11.36 5.08 4.51 n.a. .2 Other current operating expenses7 67.50 77.38 67.66 74.19 76.97 100.00 56.2

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.76 4.05 10.88 2.62 12.84 n.a. 38.7 Farm real estate 4.34 3.98 6.14 3.50 5.60 n.a. 2.9 Other8 3.46 .82 1.21 10.11 n.a. n.a. 1.9

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 17.88 2.73 29.62 16.70 30.40 78.62 2.9 Other 74.28 91.32 69.74 81.96 66.86 21.38 49.5 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,973]


Steelcase, Inc., Global Headquarters, Grand Rapids, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on September 3, 2008, in response to a 
petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Steelcase, Inc., Global Headquarters, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of September 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-22405 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# National Employer Support of the Guard And Reserve Week, 2008

Throughout history, America has counted on brave individuals willing to put on the uniform to protect our land and defend our way of life.  This week we honor and recognize the many contributions members of our National Guard and Reserve make to our Nation, and we thank the civilian employers who support these individuals as they answer the call of duty.

The men and women of the National Guard and Reserve have demonstrated the highest form of citizenship, and their service is vital to the security of our country and the peace of the world.  As the early patriots who claimed our Nation's liberty did, today's Guard and Reserve are fighting a new and unprecedented war and pledging their lives and honor to defend our freedom.  As many of those early patriots did, members of today's Guard and Reserve lead civilian lives but stand ready to wear our Nation's uniform when liberty is threatened.  The families of the National Guard and Reserve serve our Nation by proudly standing behind these brave men and women, and America appreciates their sacrifice as well.

In all they do, the National Guard and Reserve and their families represent the best of the American spirit.

Our Nation also depends on the commitment of the civilian employers of the members of the National Guard and Reserve.  In offices and factories across America, organizations do without the talents of many hard-working people who have been called upon to protect our country.  Our Nation's employers provide time off, pay, healthcare benefits, and job security because they care about and love their country.  These businesses have put patriotism above profit, and they deserve the gratitude of all Americans.

During National Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve Week, a grateful country pays tribute to the men and women of the National Guard and Reserve, and we express our gratitude to the employers who support them and help enable them to serve.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 14 through September 20, 2008, as National Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve Week.  I encourage all Americans to join me in expressing our thanks to members of our National Guard and Reserve and their civilian employers for their patriotism and sacrifices on behalf of our Nation.  I also call upon State and local officials, private organizations, businesses, and all military commanders to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E8-21860

Billing code 3195-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gerard Joseph Bean

v. Civil No. 07-cv-328-SM

Northern NH Correctional

Facility, Warden

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: October 30, 2007

cc: Gerard Joseph Bean, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00328-SM Document 4 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 1

Bean v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert V. Towle

v. No. 06-fp-464

N.H. Department of Corrections, Commissioner, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $19.80 is due no later than

January 15, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-464-PB. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 15, 2006

cc: Robert V. Towle, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:06-cv-00464-JL Document 3 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 1
#### MALONE v. PIERSON et al.

No. 5129.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1935.

Rusca & Cunningham; of Natchitoches, for appellant.

Stephens & Gahagan, of Natchitoches, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

Without going into the pleadings, issues, and facts of this case, it is most evident that the minutes of the court are incorrect, in that they do not show that an answer was filed, which in fact was filed.

They also show a motion for rehearing on the exception of no cause of action was filed June 12, 1934, when in fact the motion shows that it was filed on June 11, 1934.

The minutes next show the rehearing on the exception of no cause of action was fixed for June 20, 1934, the rehearing allowed, the exception argued and submitted to the court. The minutes fail to show what, if anything, was done with the exception after same was submitted to the court.

Then, on July 7th, we find a minute entry showing default entered against the Warrantor on the call in warranty, and the case fixed for trial. The answer and call in warranty shows on its face that it was filed on June 23, 1934, which answer begins by reserving all rights under the .exception herein filed and overruled by the court, and reserving all rights thereunder.

If it were not for the patent errors in the minutes, we would, of course, assume that the exception of no cause of action, when argued on rehearing, was never passed upon, and it would necessarily pass out of the case, but since the minutes are, on the face of the record, deficient, we cannot assume this as a fact, since defendant in answer (which the minutes fail to show was filed) recites that the exception was overruled, and the answer bears the filing mark of the clerk showing it was actually filed.

We therefore think, in fairness to all parties, that the case should be remanded, with instructions to the clerk to correct the minutes to show actually what transpired in regard to this case in the lower court.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**WRITTEN CERTIFICATION of**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, Michael E. Jalbert hereby certifies as follows: 

(1) He is the dulyappointed Chief Executive Officer of EFJ, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 

(2) Based on his knowledge, the Company’s Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this third day of August, 2006.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10377

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADRIUM CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CR-177-2-A

--------------------

January 8, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adrium Clark appeals his 438-month sentence from his guiltyplea conviction for one count of bank robbery and two counts of

using or carrying a firearm in connection with a crime of violence.

Clark argues that the district court’s imposition of consecutive

sentence terms is grossly disproportionate to his offenses and

constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth

Amendment. Clark raises this argument for the first time on
No. 02-10377

-2-

appeal. Therefore, it is reviewed for plain error. See United

States v. Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 1995).

When evaluating an Eighth Amendment proportionality challenge,

this court makes a threshold comparison between the gravity of the

charged offense and the severity of the sentence. See McGruder v.

Puckett, 954 F.2d 313, 316 (5th Cir. 1992). Only if the sentence

is grossly disproportionate to the offense does the court go on to

compare the sentence at issue with (1) sentences imposed for other

crimes in the same jurisdiction and (2) sentences imposed for the

same crime in other jurisdictions. Id.

The statutes under which Clark pleaded guilty mandated

consecutive terms of imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(D),

(c)(1)(A)(i). The record contains an extensive history of violent

crimes committed by Clark. See McGruder, 954 F.3d at 317.

Accordingly, his statutorily-mandated sentence was not grossly

disproportionate to his offenses. The judgment and sentence of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-56-01/04-SM

Raymond Cole and Garret Morin

O R D E R

Defendant Raymond Cole has filed a motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial (document no. 59). The motion is granted, but the

continuance is limited to 30 days. Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2009

trial period. Defendant Cole shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than April 20, 2009. On the filing of such waiver, the continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 7, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

Jury Selection: May 19, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00056-SM Document 60 Filed 04/08/09 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

April 8, 2009

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq. 

Paul Twomey, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00056-SM Document 60 Filed 04/08/09 Page 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0




</TABLE>
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2019-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2019 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
 
Kevin J. Cullum

President and ChiefExecutive Officer of

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rex Fornaro

v. Case No. 06-cv-468-PB

Daniel P. Neelon, et al.

O R D E R

 By order dated December 14, 2006, Attorney Thomas L. Ferro was informed that a

motion pro hac vice must be filed on his behalf within thirty (30) days or the matter may be

referred to a judicial office for further action. On that same date, a notice was forwarded to

Attorney Ferro informing him that he must register for ECF within 30 days. On January 19,

2007, and again on January 23, 2007, the clerk’s office made courtesy telephone calls to Attorney

Ferro’s office to inform him that a pro hac vice motion and his ECF registration were past due

and to request he immediately file the required documents. As of this date, no pro hac vice

motion has been filed nor has Attorney Ferro registered for ECF. 

Attorney Ferro shall register for ECF, and a pro hac vice motion shall be filed on his

behalf, on or before February 8, 2007. If Attorney Ferro fails to take this action within this time

frame, the court will immediately remove him as counsel of record in the case without further

order of the court.

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 1, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

 Paul J. Barbadoro

 District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00468-PB Document 14 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2563

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Michael Ybarra, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2000

Filed: February 10, 2000 

___________

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ybarra appeals his sentence for conspiring to distribute

methamphetamine. For reversal, Ybarra raises various challenges to the government's

failure to move for a sentencing departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 5K1.1, p.s. (1999), and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e).

We reject these contentions. Ybarra did not complain at sentencing about the

lack of a departure motion, the plea agreement preserved the government's discretion

whether to move for departure, and Ybarra made no substantial threshold showing the
-2-

government acted irrationally, in bad faith, or based on an unconstitutional motive. See

United States v. Kelly, 18 F.3d 612, 617-18 (8th Cir. 1994); United States v. Romsey,

975 F.2d 556, 558 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Oransky, 908 F.2d 307, 309 (8th

Cir. 1990). Ybarra also has not shown how he was prejudiced by the denial of his

sentencing-continuance motion. See United States v. Ulrich, 953 F.2d 1082, 1085 (8th

Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph Chambers

v. 07-cv-326-PB

NH Prison, et al.

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated November 9, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

December 13, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Randolp Chambers, Pro se

Laura Lombardi, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00326-JL Document 18 Filed 12/13/07 Page 1 of 1