alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure
Capital Fund, LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
|July 22, 2010                                  

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will be retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-119-01/02-SM

Carlos Marsach

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial for sixty days (document

no. 25) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the July trial period. Defendant

shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 26, 2009. On the filing

of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: July 15, 2009 at 3:30 PM 

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 26 Filed 05/12/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: July 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 12, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 26 Filed 05/12/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Yorgo Foods, Inc.

v. Case No. 08-cv-438-SM

Orics Industries, Inc.

ORDER

Re: Document No. 32, Amended Motion to Compel Discovery

Ruling: Granted. The record as it currently stands suggests 

that the requested information is relevant to plaintiff’s contract

breach claim (e.g. in relation to the determination of a

commercially reasonable time under the circumstances) and to its

still extant claims based on misrepresentation and fraudulent

inducement. However, the detailed information related to client

identity, price, and other proprietary information may be redacted. 

Should the parties be unable to agree on appropriate redaction or

coverage under the protective order, the information may be filed

for in camera review and the court will redact and disseminate the

information after considering the defendant’s protective claims.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: July 20, 2010

cc: Paul R. Kfoury, Sr., Esq.

Ronald E.Cook, Esq.

Andrew B. Livernois, Esq.

Lisa Lee, Esq. 

Case 1:08-cv-00438-SM Document 35 Filed 07/20/10 Page 1 of 1
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2004: Q4... 6.8 6.8 6.4

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.1 6.7

 Q2... 7.4 7.3 6.9

 Q3... 7.7 7.7 7.2

 Q4... 8.1 8.0 7.6

2006: Q1... 8.3 8.3 7.8

 Q2... 8.7 8.7 8.2

 Q3... 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q4... 9.0 8.8 8.3

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2004: Q4... 7.3 7.1 6.6

2005: Q1... 7.5 7.3 6.8

 Q2... 7.7 7.5 7.0

 Q3... 8.1 7.9 7.3

 Q4... 8.4 8.2 7.6

2006: Q1... 8.6 8.4 7.9

 Q2... 9.0 8.8 8.2

 Q3... 9.1 8.9 8.4

 Q4... 9.6 9.1 8.3

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2004: Q4... 6.7 7.0 6.9

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.3 7.3

 Q2... 7.4 7.7 7.5

 Q3... 7.9 8.0 7.8

 Q4... 8.8 8.8 8.5

2006: Q1... 8.9 9.0 8.6

 Q2... 9.1 9.1 8.7

 Q3... 9.3 9.3 8.8

 Q4... 9.4 9.4 8.8

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 06-cr-159-01-SM

Charmine Preston

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 17) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than February 27, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:06-cr-00159-SM Document 18 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 20, 2007 at 1:30 PM

Jury Selection: April 3, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

February 22, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq. 

 Mark Sisti, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00159-SM Document 18 Filed 02/22/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1925 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1925

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, 
     as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2001

 Mr. Edwards introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, 
     as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING WACO MAMMOTH SITE AREA.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 6 months after funds are first made 
available for this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
complete a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of 
designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area located in the city of Waco, 
Texas, as a unit of the National Park System.
    (b) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study required by this section.
    (c) Submission of Study Results.--Not later than 30 days after 
completion of the study required under subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall submit to the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 
the Senate a report describing the results of the study.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-121698-08]
          - RIN 1545-B100

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations that provide rules relating to the disclosure and use of tax return information by tax return preparers.

# DATES:

The public hearing, originally scheduled for October 6, 2008 at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Funmi Taylor of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) at (202) 622-3628 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     A notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations and a notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 (73 FR 37910) announced that a public hearing was scheduled for October 6, 2008, at 10 a.m. in the NYU Room (room 2615), Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under the section 7216 of the Internal Revenue Code.                

Outlines of topics to be discussed at the hearing were due on September 15, 2008. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Monday, September 22, 2008, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for October 6, 2008 is cancelled.

LaNita Van Dyke,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. E8-22824 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1I liberally construe O’Mara’s request for reconsideration

as an objection to my report and recommendation of July 17, 2008.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Timothy M. O’Mara

v. 08-cv-51-SM

Superintendent, Hillsborough County

Department of Corrections, et al.

O R D E R

Pro se plaintiff Timothy M. O’Mara seeks reconsideration

(document no. 13)1 of my report and recommendation (document no.

10), recommending dismissal of certain claims raised in his civil

rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Named as

defendants are William Wrenn, Commissioner of the New Hampshire

Department of Corrections (“NHDOC”), Toni Pappas, Commissioner of

Hillsborough County, the Hillsborough County Department of

Corrections (“HCDOC”), and the following HCDOC employees: James

M. O’Mara, Jr., Superintendent; Linda Norman, bookkeeper; C.

Beaudon, mail agent; and corrections officers D. Dionne, Robbins,

Pinciaro, Riley, Brown, Granville, W. Raymond, W. Scurry, William

McDougall, Tony Sawer and Menic.

Case 1:08-cv-00051-SM Document 30 Filed 10/21/08 Page 1 of 3
2

 O’Mara challenges the dismissal of the following claims: (1)

Fourteenth Amendment claim arising from the denial of adequate

out-of-cell and recreation time; (2) Fourteenth Amendment claim

arising from the manner and condition in which he was served

food; (3) First and Fourteenth Amendment claims arising from the

alleged interference with his mail, legal documents and access to

the courts; and (4) Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims

arising from unreasonable searches and seizures and the

deprivation of personal property.

 For the reasons stated in the report and recommendation

issued simultaneously herewith, I find O’Mara’s objection to be

meritorious with regard to one claim: the Fourteenth Amendment

claim premised upon the denial of out-of-cell and recreation

time. Accordingly, I order that claim to be answered by

defendants O‘Mara and Dionne. With regard to the remaining

claims, nothing in O’Mara’s motion for reconsideration has

altered the analysis set forth in my previous report and

recommendation. I therefore recommend that his objection be

denied as to the remaining claims.

As I find that O’Mara has stated a claim upon which relief

may be granted, I order the claim be answered by defendants

O’Mara and Dionne. 

Case 1:08-cv-00051-SM Document 30 Filed 10/21/08 Page 2 of 3
3

 Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead within twenty

days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A).

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorneys, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 21, 2008

cc: Timothy M. O’Mara, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00051-SM Document 30 Filed 10/21/08 Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 136




---



##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the annual period ended December 31,
2007 containing financial statements (periodic report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
    
    the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.
 Date: February 29, 2008
    
    /s/ Sheila A. Stoke

Sheila A. StokeSenior Vice President,Corporate Controller
 137
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6501

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHAWN THOMAS, a/k/a Bucky,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cr-00163-JKB-2; 1:20-cv-00409-JKB)

Submitted: October 21, 2022 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6501 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6501 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 543,113 16,546 32,660 33,407 34,850 130,36Number of loans 8,305 3,015 2,269 1,071 512 91Weighted average maturity (months)1 23.65 11.92 17.48 20.01 23.23 42.8

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 12.45 8.91 11.90 13.20 11.20 23.9

Weighted average risk rating3 2.42 2.33 2.53 2.36 2.33 2.2

Weighted average interest rate4 8.75 9.19 9.06 9.12 8.73 8.6

 Standard error5 .14 .14 .22 .14 .16 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.42 9.73 9.69 9.65 9.50 9.4 25th percentile 8.26 8.30 8.45 8.77 8.25 8.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.06 9.79 8.59 9.65 8.54 9.0 Other livestock 8.93 8.70 9.17 10.17 9.56 9.0 Other current operating expenses7 8.67 9.05 9.08 9.02 8.79 8.6

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.03 9.75 8.93 8.94 8.17 9.1 Farm real estate 8.50 n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.02 8.5 Other8 8.95 9.97 9.42 9.18 7.50 n.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 35.61 30.65 34.75 44.91 43.56 31.9 Under commitment 50.53 49.91 41.64 41.52 47.39 43.9 Callable 32.23 16.75 29.38 14.57 12.94 11.4 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 12.43 4.95 6.38 5.58 11.05 4.5 Other livestock 4.84 8.99 19.67 5.30 8.03 7.5 Other current operating expenses7 70.60 67.88 45.35 63.70 58.35 68.0

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.72 16.20 20.55 16.32 5.35 6.8 Farm real estate 4.66 n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.33 13.0 Other8 2.75 1.97 8.05 9.11 6.90 n.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.57 4.90 9.21 8.03 19.75 19.2 Other 84.25 88.89 86.95 86.68 80.25 80.7 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
|     |                                                                                                                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |
| /s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEE |
| Name:                    | Shiraz Y. Kajee |
| Date:                    | March 27, 2020 |
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of M Power Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation


(the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




·
            The
                Quarterly Report for the quarter ended Sept 30, 2006 (the "Form
                10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





·
            the
                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Dated: May
      15,
      2007





/s/
      Gary
      F. Kimmons


---------------------------------


Gary
      F.
      Kimmons, President,


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2026

To make appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for the establishment and

operation of a plant genetic conservation center.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To make appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for the establishment and operation of a plant genetic conservation

center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Plant Genetic Con5 servation Center Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION FOR PLANT GENETIC CONSERVA7 TION CENTER.

8 The following sums are appropriated, out of any

9 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fis10 cal year 2002:
2

•HR 2026 IH

1 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

2 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE

3 PLANT GENETIC CONSERVATION CENTER

4 For the establishment and operation of a center to

5 carry out a plant genetic conservation program to store

6 genetic material from rare, endangered, and threatened

7 plants, including construction and maintenance of a tem8 perature-controlled facility for such purpose, $5,000,000.

Æ