alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 15 - 00346 - CV
MATTHEW S. BOVEE , Appellant v. HOUSTON PRESS LLP, M ARGARET DOWNING, DIANNA WRAY , PETER RYAN, DALLAS OBSERVE R, LLP, KXAN, DAWN DENNY, PATRICK WILLIAMS, MEDIA GENERAL INC., VOICE MEDIA GROUP, DOES 1 THROUG H 5, AND MICHELLE HEINZ , Appellee s

From the 249th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. DC
- C201500272

O R D E R
Appellant’s affidavit of indigence was filed on November 9, 2015. The requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies CodeBovee v. Houston Press LLP Page 2

apply when indigent inmates file a civil appeal. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 14.002 (West 2002); Anderson v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Justice , ___ S.W.3d ___, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2674 (Tex. App.

— Waco Mar. 19, 2015, no pet.). Chapter 14 requires ap pellant, as an inmate, to file an affidavit or declaration "relating to previous filings" in which appellant must detail all previous civil actions filed pro se, other than a suit under the Family Code

. T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN . § 14.004(a) (West 2002); Anderson v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Justice , 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2674 at *5. Appellant has not filed an affidavit or declaration relating to his previous filings in this appeal. Accordingly, appellant is ordered to file an affidavit or declaratio n relating to his previous filings required by Chapter 14 within 14 days from the date of this Order. Failure to timely file this additional document will result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice and a finding that the appeal is frivolous. Anderson , 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2674 at *5.
PER CURIAM
Bef ore Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Documents ordered filed Order issued and filed November 19, 2015
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1202

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

of annual screening pap smears and screening pelvic exams under the

Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mrs. THURMAN, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mrs. MYRICK,

Mr. BENTSEN, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr.

MCGOVERN, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage of annual screening pap smears and screening pelvic exams under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Annual Pap

5 Tests to Save Women’s Lives Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1202 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF ANNUAL SCREENING PAP SMEAR

2 AND SCREENING PELVIC EXAM.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—

4 (1) ANNUAL SCREENING PAP SMEAR.—Section

5 1861(nn)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

6 1395x(nn)(1)), as amended by section 101(a)(1) of

7 the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Im8 provement and Protection Act of 2000, as enacted

9 into law by section 1(a)(6) of Public Law 106–554,

10 is amended by striking ‘‘if the individual involved

11 has not had such a test during the preceding 2

12 years, or during the preceding year in the case of a

13 woman described in paragraph (3).’’ and inserting

14 ‘‘if the woman involved has not had such a test dur15 ing the preceding year.’’.

16 (2) ANNUAL SCREENING PELVIC EXAM.—Sec17 tion 1861(nn)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

18 1395x(nn)(2)), as amended by section 101(a)(2) of

19 the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Im20 provement and Protection Act of 2000, as enacted

21 into law by section 1(a)(6) of Public Law 106–554,

22 is amended by striking ‘‘during the preceding 2

23 years, or during the preceding year in the case of a

24 woman described in paragraph (3),’’ and inserting

25 ‘‘during the preceding year,’’.
3

•HR 1202 IH

1 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

2 1861(nn) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(nn)) is

3 amended by striking paragraph (3).

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished

6 on or after January 1, 2002.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         7,401
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               58,724
<PP&E>                                         864,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 762,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          318,500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,251,108
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,806,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   762,677
<SALES>                                        40,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40,852
<CGS>                                          16,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  642,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               235,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (853,601)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (853,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (853,601)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
#### MORGENTHAU, Secretary of Treasury, et al. v. MIFFLIN CHEMICAL CORPORATION.

Nos. 6362, 6363.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Jan. 25, 1938.

For prior opinion, see 93 F.2d 82.

J. Cullen Ganey, Acting U. S. Atty., of Bethlehem, Pa., and Julian R. Eagle and Blair M. Ilderton, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Harry Shapiro, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, THOMPSON, and BIGGS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these causes an application was made by a petition filed by the appellee to the end that this court should reconsider and vacate its order denying the appellee’s petition for a rehearing. After further extended argument by the parties, we have again considered these cases upon the whole record, and have also taken into consideration the testimony of certain witnesses, submitted by the appellee, given in the criminal proceeding entitled United States v. Mifflin Chemical Co. et al., 7523, March Term, 1937, in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Though the testimony last referred to cannot be incorporated in the record of these cases,. Qualtop Beverages, Inc., v. McCampbell, 2 Cir., 31 F.2d 260; Yudelson v. Andrews, 3 Cir., 25 F.2d 80; Quitt v. Stone, 4 Cir., 46 F.2d 405, 408; Herbert v. Anstine, 4 Cir., 37 F.2d 522, 555, none the less we have examined it as fully as if it had been incorporated therein.

After such consideration, our decisions heretofore made in these cases remain unchanged.

The petition filed by the appellee for reconsideration and vacation of our order denying the appellee’s petition for rehearing accordingly will be dismissed.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                         |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      April 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Deli Du             |   |
|                      |   | Deli      Du                 |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-229-01-SM

Tony Rosas

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 7) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than February 1, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 8 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 21, 2008 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: April 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

January 28, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Michael Zaino, Esq.

 Jessica Brown, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 8 Filed 01/28/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ELMWOOD
FUNDNG LIMITED'S UNAUDITED F/S AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1925 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1925

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, as 
       a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING WACO MAMMOTH SITE AREA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 
State of Texas, the city of Waco, and other appropriate organizations, 
shall carry out a special resource study regarding the national 
significance, suitability, and feasibility of designating the Waco 
Mammoth Site Area located in the city of Waco, Texas, as a unit of the 
National Park System.
    (b) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study required by this section.

SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF STUDY RESULTS.

    Not later than 3 years after funds are first made available for 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Resources of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report describing the results of the study.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2004: Q2... 6.4 6.3 6.0

 Q3... 6.6 6.5 6.2

 Q4... 6.8 6.8 6.4

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.1 6.7

 Q2... 7.4 7.3 6.9

 Q3... 7.7 7.7 7.2

 Q4... 8.1 8.0 7.6

2006: Q1... 8.3 8.3 7.8

 Q2... 8.7 8.7 8.2

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2004: Q2... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 Q3... 7.3 6.8 6.4

 Q4... 7.3 7.1 6.6

2005: Q1... 7.5 7.3 6.8

 Q2... 7.7 7.5 7.0

 Q3... 8.1 7.9 7.3

 Q4... 8.4 8.2 7.6

2006: Q1... 8.6 8.4 7.9

 Q2... 9.0 8.8 8.2

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2004: Q2... 6.0 6.2 6.6

 Q3... 6.2 6.6 6.8

 Q4... 6.7 7.0 6.9

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.3 7.3

 Q2... 7.4 7.7 7.5

 Q3... 7.9 8.0 7.8

 Q4... 8.8 8.8 8.5

2006: Q1... 8.9 9.0 8.6

 Q2... 9.1 9.1 8.7

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 16, 2010 | /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge              |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Paul Van Ostenbridge                  |   |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |                                  |   |
|                   |                                  |   |
| Dated: August 16, 2010 | /s/ Claire M. Chadwick                |   |
|                   | Claire M. Chadwick                    |   |
|                   | Senior Vice President and             |   |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer               |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

ex rel. RICHARD BOUDREAU and )

JANINE BOUDREAU and TIM )

HENDRICKS and PAT HENDRICKS, )

)

Plaintiffs, ) No. 08-CV-0416-JD 

) 

v. ) 

)

CYRUS SORAT, et al. ) FILED UNDER SEAL - LEVEL I

 )

Defendants, )

)

and )

)

GLOBAL HEALTHCARE RECOVERY )

SERVICES, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CYRUS SORAT, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

 ORDER 

Upon consideration of the United States' unopposed ex parte motion, pursuant to the

False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(3), for an extension of time, to and including December

7, 2009, in which to determine whether or not to intervene in the above-captioned action and

during which the complaint and other filings shall remain under seal, it is hereby

ORDERED that the United States shall have until and including December 7, 2009, to

intervene in the above-captioned action or to notify the Court that it declines to do so; and

Case 1:08-cv-00416-JD Document 11 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and all other filings shall remain under seal

until and including December 7, 2009, upon order of this Court, unless the United States requests

that the seal be lifted prior to that date.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: 

June 4, 2009 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Case 1:08-cv-00416-JD Document 11 Filed 06/04/09 Page 2 of 2
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 27, 2005