alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
____________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2           Q3            Q4           Total
____________________________________________________________________________________

1985......    |            12          21            17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14            21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19            12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6            12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7             5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5             6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2             3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1             1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2             2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0             0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0             0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2             0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0             0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0             1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0             0             1              2
2003......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2004......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2005......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2006......    |             0           0          n.a.          n.a.           n.a.
____________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 125 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 125 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




September 2022


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: January 19, 2023
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-122-PB

Larry N. Laing

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 6, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize plea negotiations or prepare for

trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 6, 2008 to July 8, 2008. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00122-PB Document 19 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 28, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

June 24, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 25, 2008

cc: Cathy Green, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00122-PB Document 19 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8517
DAVID MAURICE BEATTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR LINCOLN, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge; Wallace Wade Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-983) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Maurice Beatty, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and a magistrate judge's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and magistrate judge. Beatty v. Lincoln , No. CA-95-983 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 4 & 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,832,763
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     101,537
<MORTGAGE>                                     485,243
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    7,556
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               7,775,702
<CASH>                                          21,927
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               6,242
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         141,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,354,969
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,083,600
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   5,570
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           98,648
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                266,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           86,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,735
<OTHER-SE>                                     909,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,354,969
<PREMIUMS>                                      33,674
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            133,173
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,219
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     107,356
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      8,191
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            27,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### James Jonke, Appellant, v F.W. Woolworth Co. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[810 NYS2d 7]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 20, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the cross motion by defendants *418Venator Group Specialty Co., F.W. Woolworth Co. and Village Wheels Bike Shop for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was based on evidentiary proof submitted in admissible form, including plaintiff’s own sworn deposition testimony and verified bill of particulars. Plaintiff testified that he saw and heard the bicycle suspension fork break when the accident occurred. Defendants’ evidence regarding the manufacturer’s installation of the bicycle fork, plaintiffs own installation of an upgrade modification, and the description of the accident are based in large measure on plaintiff’s personal knowledge.

No party has submitted any evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the bicycle was in a defective condition when it left the possession of the moving defendants *(see Zuckerman v City of New*York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]; *cf. Robinson v Reed-Prentice Div. of Package Mach. Co.,*49 NY2d 471 [1980]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1654

To provide for the conveyance of certain National Forest System lands to

the towns of Laona and Wabeno, Wisconsin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2001

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance of certain National Forest

System lands to the towns of Laona and Wabeno, Wisconsin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCES, NICOLET NATIONAL FOR4 EST, WISCONSIN.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE TO TOWN OF LAONA.—

6 (1) CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary of Agri7 culture (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Sec8 retary’’) shall convey, without consideration, to the

9 town of Laona, Wisconsin, all right, title, and inter10 est of the United States in and to the parcel of Na-
2

•HR 1654 IH

1 tional Forest System land in Forest County, Wis2 consin, described in paragraph (2), for the purpose

3 of permitting the town to use the parcel as a site for

4 an industrial park and for other purposes.

5 (2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—The parcel of land

referred to in paragraph (1) consists of the SW. 1 6 ⁄4

of the NW. 1⁄4, SE. 1⁄4 of the NW. 1⁄4, NE. 1 7 ⁄4 of

the SW. 1⁄4, NW 1⁄4 of the SW. 1 8 ⁄4, and that part

of the SW. 1⁄4 of the NE. 1 9 ⁄4 not previously conveyed

10 by the United States in section 6, townships 35 and

11 36 north, range 15 east, Forest County, Wisconsin.

12 (b) CONVEYANCE TO TOWN OF WABENO.—

13 (1) CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary shall convey,

14 without consideration, to the town of Wabeno, Wis15 consin, all right, title, and interest of the United

16 States in and to the parcel of National Forest Sys17 tem land in Forest County, Wisconsin, described in

18 paragraph (2), for the purpose of permitting the

19 town to use the parcel as a site for an industrial

20 park and for other purposes.

21 (2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—The parcel of land

referred to in paragraph (1) consists of the SE. 1 22 ⁄4

of the SW. 1⁄4, part of the NW. 1⁄4 of the SW. 1 23 ⁄4,

NE. 1⁄4 of the SW. 1⁄4, SW 1⁄4 of the NW. 1 24 ⁄4, and
3

•HR 1654 IH

SE. 1⁄4 of the NW. 1 1 ⁄4 in section 7, township 34

2 north, range 15 east, Forest County, Wisconsin.

3 (c) SURVEY.—If necessary, the exact acreage and

4 legal description of the lands to be conveyed under sub5 sections (a) and (b) shall be determined by surveys satis6 factory to the Secretary. The cost of a survey shall be

7 borne by the recipient of the land.

8 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

9 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi10 tions in connection with the conveyances under this section

11 as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter12 ests of the United States.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFOPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens ‘nThings, Inc. for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Robert J. DiNicola, as Chief Executive Officer of Linens‘n Things, Inc., and Francis M. Rowan, asChief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Linens‘n Things, Inc.
| /s/ Robert J.  DiNicola |                                               |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| **Name:**               | Robert J. DiNicola                                 |
| **Title:**              | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer              |
| **Date:**               | November 14, 2006                                  |
| ** **              |                                               |
| ** **              |                                               |
| /s/ Francis M.  Rowan   |                                               |
| **Name:**               | Francis M. Rowan                                   |
| **Title:**              | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| **Date:**               | November 14, 2006                                  |
|                         |                                                    |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         31,058
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,108
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,208
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,378,223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,588,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,108
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Timothy M. Francis and

Tammy A. Francis

v. Civil No. 06-cv-480-PB

Lindon L. Pulley

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Defendant has moved to vacate preliminary orders for

attachments and injunctive relief. Document no. 23. This motion

was referred to me. 

Discussion

This suit was instituted in late December. Pursuant to LR

73.1(b)(2)(B) it was randomly assigned to me. The only party who

had then appeared consented to my jurisdiction and requested a

temporary restraining order and some attachments. I granted them

and ordered a hearing on the requested preliminary injunction and

ordered that (pursuant to New Hampshire law) defendant be

informed of his right to a hearing to object to the attachments. 

Defendant was served with the notice of the preliminary

injunction prior to the hearing. 

However, it does not appear that plaintiff complied with

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 38 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 3
2

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 511-A:8 and 511-A:10, and the

implementing rules of the Superior Court which require notice of

a right to a hearing on the attachments within 14 days of service

of the petition and order. Further and importantly, defendant

was not served with the notice of assignment of the case to me

and of his right to object to that assignment until January 24,

2007. Well within the time to object to the assignment, defense

counsel filed an objection to assignment to me and the case was

reassigned to Judge Barbadoro. 

My orders of January 5th and 10th, therefore, can be deemed

a Report and Recommendation only. 

I recommend that the defendant’s motion be granted as

follows: 

1. That a hearing on the attachments be granted

either before me or Judge Barbadoro; and 

2. That my orders on the preliminary injunction be

deemed a Report and Recommendation or, alternatively, that a

de novo hearing be granted. 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 38 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 3
3

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 21, 2007 

cc: Michael G. Furlong, Esq.

 Irvin D. Gordon, Esq.

 John J. LaRivee, Esq.

 Kevin M. O’Shea, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 38 Filed 06/21/07 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20921

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL DOMINGUEZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-98-CR-126-2)

September 26, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rafael Dominguez, Jr., appeals his conviction by guilty plea

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled

substance. He argues that the government failed to establish the

factual basis for his plea and that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel. After reviewing the briefs and the record,

we find no grounds for reversal.2

D ominguez pleaded guilty to violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and

846. He argues that since the government conceded that he did not

know that there was cocaine included in the shipment of marijuana

he made, there is no factual basis for his guilty plea to the

charge that he conspired to possess with intent to distribute both

marijuana and cocaine. Section 841, which defines the offense

underlying the conspiracy, requires only knowing possession with

intent to distribute a controlled substance

. Dominguez’s knowledge

that the shipment contained marijuana provided a factual basis for

his guilty plea. Whether or not he was aware of the cocaine in the

shipment does not bear on his guilt under Sections 841 and 846; the

references to cocaine in Section 841 appear only in its sentencing

provisions.

This court generally declines to review claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel on direct appeal. United States v. Gibson

, 55

F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995). We have “undertaken to resolve

claims of inadequate representation on direct appeal only in rare

cases where the record allowed us to evaluate fairly the merits of

th e claim.” U

nited States v. Higdon

, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir.

1987). This is not such a case.

For these reasons, Dominguez’s conviction and sente nce are

AFFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury United States Mint
 SUMMARY: The United States Mint is adjusting prices for its 2007 American Eagle Gold Proof and Uncirculated Coins. Pursuant to the authority that 31 U.S.C. 5111(a) and 5112(a)(7-10) grant the Secretary of the Treasury to mint and issue gold coins, and to prepare and distribute numismatic items, the United States Mint mints and issues 2007 American Eagle Gold Proof and Uncirculated Coins with the following weights: One-ounce, one-half ounce, one-quarter ounce, one-tenth ounce. The United States Mint also produces an American Eagle four-coin set that contains one coin of each denomination. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(B), the United States Mint is changing the price of these coins to reflect the increase in value of the underlying precious metal content of the coins—the result of increases in the market price of gold. 
                        ( print page 7366) Accordingly, effective February 1, 2008, the United States Mint will commence selling the following 2007 American Eagle Gold Uncirculated Coins and the 2007 American Eagle 
                        1/10
                        -Ounce Proof Coin according to the following price schedule: Description
Price2007 American Eagle 
                            1/10
                            -Ounce Gold Proof Coin:
$146.95American Eagle Gold Uncirculated Coins:One-ounce gold uncirculated coin
1,045.95One-half ounce gold uncirculated coin
529.95One-quarter ounce gold uncirculated coin
279.95One-tenth ounce gold uncirculated coin
119.95Four-coin gold uncirculated set
1,939.95
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria C. Eskridge, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500. Authority:
                        31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701. Dated: January 31, 2008. Daniel P. Shaver, Acting Deputy Director, United States Mint.


[FR Doc. E8-2207 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810-02-P