alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jonathan Lee Riches

#40498-018f

WILLIAMSBURG FCI

Inmate Mail/Parcels

P.O. Box 340

SALTERS, SC 29590

ORDER - FILING FEE OMITTED

In re : File No. 1 :07-fp-344, Jonathan Lee Riches v. I. Lewis Libby. Jr ., et at

The above-captioned action was received by the court on 10/18/07, but items necessary to

docket the case were not included. Either the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

must be submitted to the court by 12/20/07 .

Filing Fee. Filing fee in the amount of $350, may be in cash, certified bank check or money

order (made payable to Clerk, U .S. District Court), or by credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover,

Diners Club, or American Express). The court does not accept personal checks .

-ORIn Forma Pauperis. If in forma pauperis status is sought :

• Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (USDCNH- 13 or substantially similar filing)

• Financial Declaration (USDCNIH-15 or substantially similar filing)

• CertificateofCustodialInstitution(USDCNIH-14orsubstantiallysimilarfiling)completed

by an official at the institution

This action will not be considered a civil case or any action taken until the appropriate fee

has been received or in forma pauperis status has been granted .

By the Court,

/s/ Janice E. Boucher

October 23, 2007 Janice E. Boucher

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:07-fp-00344 Document 2 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2007 Q4 survey,

region share of national

total 2.8 8.9 26.0 22.1 7.6 5.3 5.0 8.7 5.5 8.2

Sample coverage, 2007 Q4

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 5.5 4.4 17.7 32.5 20.3 11.3 9.1 6.4 8.4 29.7

Avg. loan size, 2007 Q4 survey

(thousands of dollars) 80.7 30.9 62.7 94.9 102.0 91.2 58.5 42.3 31.9 93.0

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

2002: Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5

2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.1 4.5

Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2

2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8

Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1

Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9

Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2

2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0

Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7

Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8

Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5

2006: Q1 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.5 7.8

(0.29) (0.15) (0.21) (0.37) (0.13) (0.37) (0.29) (0.12) (0.26) (0.25)

Q2 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.9 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 7.8

(0.47) (0.18) (0.40) (0.54) (0.15) (0.53) (0.13) (0.26) (0.26) (0.17)

Q3 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.5 9.0

(0.58) (0.16) (0.12) (0.38) (0.30) (0.28) (0.29) (0.17) (0.21) (0.21)

Q4 9.2 8.6 7.4 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 8.9

(0.26) (0.24) (0.53) (0.38) (0.32) (0.63) (0.17) (0.18) (0.31) (0.14)

2007: Q1 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.9

(0.38) (0.27) (0.17) (0.41) (0.28) (0.41) (0.16) (0.28) (0.18) (0.07)

Q2 8.1 8.6 8.1 8.4 7.7 8.6 8.6 9.1 9.4 8.6

(0.16) (0.19) (0.41) (0.41) (0.31) (0.50) (0.11) (0.13) (0.12) (0.32)

Q3 10.4 8.6 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.9 8.9 9.5 8.6

(0.01) (0.42) (0.15) (0.35) (0.33) (0.44) (0.26) (0.17) (0.07) (0.30)

Q4 7.4 8.6 7.5 7.3 6.8 8.1 8.6 8.6 8.9 7.6

(0.01) (0.16) (0.25) (0.55) (0.47) (0.41) (0.17) (0.23) (0.15) (0.22)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is

Delta States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

They are calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.

19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-112-01-SM

Joseph Allen

O R D E R

Defendant Allen’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 12). Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2009 trial

period. Defendant Allen shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

March 16, 2009. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 8, 2009 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: May 19, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00112-SM Document 13 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 5, 2009

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, Esq.

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00112-SM Document 13 Filed 03/05/09 Page 2 of 2
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 462,529 53,013 94,052 205,595 26,302 113 42,349 Number of loans 12,642 2,001 3,139 3,841 884 14 1,143 Weighted average maturity (months)1 33.20 15.57 42.00 33.53 31.39 48.36 25.73 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 15.20 11.77 15.46 18.42 5.06 48.33 17.16 

Weighted average risk rating3 2.54 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 8.47 8.04 8.62 8.40 9.49 10.47 8.33 

 Standard error5 .16 .62 .26 .17 1.06 n.a. .27 

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.00 8.87 9.00 8.81 9.78 10.47 9.25  25th percentile 7.98 7.78 8.03 8.04 8.31 10.47 7.76  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.91 7.38 8.90 7.82 8.87 n.a. 7.99  Other livestock 8.98 8.65 n.a. 9.20 9.03 n.a. 8.78  Other current operating expenses7 8.55 8.28 8.69 8.54 8.59 n.a. 8.49 

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.80 8.68 8.74 8.41 9.53 n.a. 8.98  Farm real estate 8.01 7.04 8.03 8.00 17.49 n.a. 7.09  Other8 8.49 6.10 n.a. 8.11 9.97 10.47 7.97 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 36.32 35.32 51.54 24.31 70.44 n.a. 17.12  Under commitment 58.06 61.71 59.10 63.34 54.79 n.a. 38.89  Callable 32.19 10.43 7.69 54.30 26.60 n.a. 2.91  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.65 .40 4.46 8.27 10.20 n.a. 1.48  Other livestock 6.18 7.82 8.59 4.07 2.59 n.a. 3.88  Other current operating expenses7 57.66 69.70 61.60 60.67 51.71 n.a. 49.50 

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.81 1.86 4.51 6.83 13.18 n.a. 18.25  Farm real estate 13.51 17.46 20.83 12.85 5.65 n.a. 13.15  Other8 7.19 2.76 n.a. 7.31 16.67 100.00 13.74 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 26.74 9.99 15.00 36.60 21.59 n.a. 34.61  Other 72.27 90.01 84.08 62.39 77.41 100.00 63.93  Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1985...... 12 21 17 18 68

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-234-PB

Nicholas Gomez

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 6, 2008 trial in the above case, citing a scheduling conflict

and the need for additional time to finalize plea negotiations or

prepare for trial. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 6, 2008 to July 8, 2008. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00234-PB Document 12 Filed 05/02/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 29, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

June 24, 2008 at 3:15 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 2, 2008

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00234-PB Document 12 Filed 05/02/08 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 196 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 196

To prohibit federally sponsored research pertaining to the legalization 
                               of drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit federally sponsored research pertaining to the legalization 
                               of drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Drug Legalization Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) The sale, possession, and use of drugs pose a pervasive 
        and substantial threat to the social, educational, and economic 
        health of the United States.
            (2) The impact of drug abuse is reflected in the violence 
        that it causes and in the disintegration of families, schools, 
        and neighborhoods.
            (3) The effects of rampant drug use are amply illustrated 
        by national violent crime statistics.
            (4) The overwhelming majority of health care and law 
        enforcement experts agree that drug legalization would have 
        disastrous consequences for the people of the United States.
            (5) Recent studies demonstrate that drug use by young 
        people is on the rise in the United States.

SEC. 3. RESTRICTION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no department or agency 
of the United States Government shall conduct or finance, in whole or 
in part, any study or research involving the legalization of any 
controlled substance (as that term is defined in section 102 of the 
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          81,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   373,400
<INVENTORY>                                    401,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               717,600
<PP&E>                                         589,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 266,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,536,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          556,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,000
<COMMON>                                       362,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,536,700
<SALES>                                      1,624,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,624,700
<CGS>                                        1,201,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,201,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.89


</TABLE>
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**December 2005**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: January 25, 2006**
H. R. 1814

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

An Act

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Metacomet-MonadnockMattabesett Trail extending through western Massachusetts and central Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National Trails System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Metacomet-MonadnockMattabesett Trail Study Act of 2002’’.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF METACOMET-MONADNOCK-MATTABESETT

TRAIL FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE

NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM.

Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C.

1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(ll) METACOMET-MONADNOCK-MATTABESETT TRAIL.—The

Metacomet-Monadnock-Mattabesett Trail, a system of trails and

potential trails extending southward approximately 180 miles

through western Massachusetts on the Metacomet-Monadnock

Trail, across central Connecticut on the Metacomet Trail and the

Mattabesett Trail, and ending at Long Island Sound.’’.

SEC. 3. EXPEDITED REPORT TO CONGRESS.

Notwithstanding the fourth sentence of section 5(b) of the

National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(b)), the Secretary of

the Interior shall submit the study required by the amendment
H. R. 1814—2

made by section 2 to Congress not later than 2 years after the

date of the enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 359,873 28,394 51,754 45,289 68,585 62,79Number of loans 11,901 5,330 3,517 1,389 1,054 42Weighted average maturity (months)1 22.18 11.19 12.77 21.72 29.15 36.6

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 10.57 6.47 7.25 9.23 10.96 13.1

Weighted average risk rating3 2.59 2.27 2.43 2.41 2.49 2.7

Weighted average interest rate4 9.04 9.22 9.24 8.98 9.28 9.0

 Standard error5 .07 .09 .10 .16 .11 .1

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.50 9.73 9.78 9.38 9.87 9.5 25th percentile 8.42 8.61 8.80 8.30 8.75 8.3 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.26 9.53 9.54 8.63 9.55 9.0 Other livestock 9.29 9.74 8.94 9.06 9.35 9.5 Other current operating expenses7 9.03 9.09 9.31 9.20 9.33 9.1

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.68 9.53 8.90 8.40 n.a. 8.5 Farm real estate 8.63 n.a. 8.86 9.41 8.59 n. Other8 9.13 8.86 9.74 9.04 9.57 8.9

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 35.25 40.40 46.14 47.28 54.89 36.9 Under commitment 59.92 59.90 49.94 45.30 51.98 56.6 Callable 23.19 21.01 14.94 17.73 20.60 12.8 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.51 3.65 5.42 5.82 5.36 20.8 Other livestock 9.07 11.74 12.21 7.99 24.70 3.8 Other current operating expenses7 68.08 69.81 67.26 57.10 53.99 51.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.16 9.88 7.51 22.78 n.a. 8.2 Farm real estate 4.62 n.a. 4.89 4.85 11.31 n. Other8 4.56 4.93 2.72 1.46 4.64 15.5

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 12.21 7.78 6.57 13.75 18.07 24.7 Other 84.24 83.72 90.44 82.78 81.93 75.2 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven J. Huard

v. Civil No. 08-cv-120

Essex County Correctional

Center, et al.

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 3, 2008

cc: Steven J. Huard, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00120-WES Document 13 Filed 06/03/08 Page 1 of 1
GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary F. Kimmons, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: April 28, 2003                   /S/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        By: Gary F. Kimmons
                                        Its: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with theQuarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the“Report”), the undersigned, Michael W. Levin, as Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that: 

(1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of           operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael W. Levin             Michael W. LevinChief Executive OfficerDate:  November 11, 2004

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
A CERTIFIED TRUE COP Y

ATTEST

By Tanisha Spinner on Dec 31, 200 8

FOR THE UNITED STATES

JUDICIAL PANEL ON

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: TYCO INTERNATIONAL, LTD., SECURITIES,

DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE )

CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER

UNITED STATES

JUDICIAL PANEL ON

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIO N

Dec 15, 2008

FILED

CLERK'S OFFIC E

MDLNo . 133 5

The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial

proceedings in the actions on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand to the

transferor courts, as provided in 28 U .S .C. § 1407(a), is appropriate .

IT 1S THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions on this conditional rem and order be remanded to their

respective transferor courts.

IT 1S ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 7.6 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on

Multidistrict Litigation , 199 F.R.D. 425, 436-38 (2001) (Rules), the transmittal of this order to the transferee

clerk for filing shall be stayed 15 days from the date of this order . If any party files a notice of opposition

with the Clerk of the Panel within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the

Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United States

District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 7 .6(g), the parties shall fumish the Clerk for the District

of New Hampshire with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded and all

necessary copies of any pleadings or other matter filed so as to enable said Clerk to comply with the order

of remand.

Inasmuch as no objection is

pending at this time, the

stay is lifted .

Dec 31, 200 8

CLERK'S OFFICE

UNITED STATES

JUDICIAL PANEL ON

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

FOR THE PANEL:

Clefk of the Panel

Case 1:05-cv-01336-PB Document 7 Filed 12/31/08 Page 1 of 1