alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Bruce C. Edwards, President and Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 4, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRUCE C. EDWARDS                 
|                     |  |     |  | Bruce C. Edwards                     
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(b)

                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned, Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of TXU
Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
        September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended; and

     2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
        Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of November, 2002.


                                    /s/ Erle Nye
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Name:  Erle Nye
                                Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
202 La. 232

#### CUSACHS v. CUSACHS et al.

No. 36899.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 30, 1942.

Fred A. Middleton and John J. Finnorn, both of New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant.

Dart & Dart, of New Orleans, for defendants and appellees.

FOURNET, Justice.

The appellees are seeking to have this appeal dismissed on the ground that only a moot question is involved.

It is their contention that the plaintiff-appellant, Barnett Cusachs, in asking for injunctive relief in this case, only sought thereby to restrain the Civil Sheriff for the Parish of Orleans from completing the sale of a certificate of 339 shares of capital stock in G. Cusachs Sons, Inc., and not to recover the proceeds of such sale, thus rendering it unnecessary for us to pass on the matter since the sale became a *fail accompli*when the plaintiff failed to apply for a sus-pensive appeal or for a mandamus to have the injunction issue pending this devolutive appeal when his case was dismissed in the district court.

■ The appellees are in error in their contention, for a mere reading of the pleadings in this case will show that the plaintiff-appellant is seeking to have the sale of this certificate of stock annulled and set aside on the ground that it was accomplished through a conspiracy on the part of the defendants Maurice and Gaspar Cusachs, his brothers, to defraud him of his stock in the closed corporation of G. Cusachs Sons, Inc., owned by all three of them, and that the injunctive relief sought by him to prevent the completion of such sale was merely incidental thereto.

Whether or not this sale should be annulled because of the alleged fraud and conspiracy on the part of Maurice and Gaspai Cusachs is a question that can only be decided after a consideration of the merits of the case. Consequently, the motion must be denied.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss this appeal is denied.
---

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41993
          24
          2
          4
          7
          11
          .121
          .010
          .018
          .035
          .0541994
          10
          1
          1
          3
          6
          .048
          .003
          .003
          .013
          .0261995
          12
          0
          3
          6
          4
          .055
          -.001
          .011
          .027
          .0161996
          7
          0
          1
          2
          4
          .031
          .000
          .003
          .009
          .0171997
          16
          -1
          0
          3
          14
          .064
          -.003
          -.001
          .010
          .0541998
          6
          -1
          3
          0
          5
          .022
          -.004
          .009
          .000
          .0161999
          15
          0
          3
          5
          7
          .051
          -.001
          .011
          .015
          .0222000
          12
          -12
          3
          8
          14
          .037
          -.037
          .009
          .022
          .0402001
          42
          10
          9
          5
          17
          .123
          .030
          .027
          .014
          .0492002
          35
          8
          6
          5
          16
          .097
          .022
          .017
          .014
          .0412003
          32
          4
          6
          8
          14
          .082
          .010
          .015
          .021
          .0342004
          18
          1
          5
          2
          10
          .044
          .003
          .012
          .005
          .021 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: August 25, 2005
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2002: Q2... 18 63 19 32 64 3 20 73 7 28 65 6 12 60 

 Q3... 23 54 23 32 64 3 26 67 7 25 69 6 16 49  Q4... 19 58 23 21 70 9 20 74 6 23 73 4 14 50 2003: Q1... 23 53 24 19 73 8 24 71 5 26 72 2 14 46  Q2... 18 65 18 17 78 6 19 75 6 23 71 5 9 63  Q3... 17 61 22 22 65 13 17 78 5 21 71 8 11 60  Q4... 15 58 27 31 59 10 13 80 7 17 76 8 11 54 2004: Q1... 13 56 31 20 71 10 15 73 12 11 71 18 16 50  Q2... 17 60 22 26 64 10 18 73 9 12 74 14 15 63 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2002: Q2... 29 60 11 37 58 5 20 74 6 20 74 6 23 58 

 Q3... 24 63 13 30 60 10 20 73 7 16 76 9 21 58  Q4... 22 66 12 26 58 15 19 75 6 18 76 6 20 64 2003: Q1... 20 67 13 22 69 10 14 84 3 11 85 4 16 67  Q2... 16 66 18 17 70 13 16 79 6 19 75 6 15 69  Q3... 17 72 12 16 65 19 14 81 6 12 85 3 11 76  Q4... 18 68 13 22 62 16 17 80 3 14 84 2 10 76 2004: Q1... 11 70 19 13 75 12 11 83 6 11 86 3 11 72  Q2... 16 68 16 27 60 13 15 81 4 11 85 4 15 70 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2002: Q2... 31 62 8 27 73 0 23 77 0 29 67 4 33 63 

 Q3... 30 57 13 22 78 0 22 78 0 21 63 16 33 59  Q4... 27 53 20 15 69 15 21 71 7 40 53 7 30 50 2003: Q1... 29 53 18 13 75 13 19 75 6 17 67 17 23 55  Q2... 25 60 15 24 71 6 31 63 6 6 78 17 19 71  Q3... 14 71 14 7 80 13 33 60 7 11 74 16 10 81  Q4... 21 74 5 12 82 6 17 78 6 15 75 10 14 82 2004: Q1... 10 81 10 17 61 22 24 71 6 23 68 9 12 76  Q2... 4 92 4 0 89 11 0 94 6 9 86 5 8 84  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1834 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1834

   To require the Department of Energy to study potential regulatory 
         improvements that may help alleviate high fuel prices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2001

Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Petri, Mr. Bartlett 
of Maryland, and Mr. English) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Department of Energy to study potential regulatory 
         improvements that may help alleviate high fuel prices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
Energy shall undertake a study of areas where Federal regulations may 
be modified to help alleviate ongoing gasoline price pressures, 
including--
            (1) the potential for improvements related to increased 
        costs resulting from the high number of ``boutique'' fuel 
        formulations produced in the United States;
            (2) the potential for decreasing refining costs through 
        changes in fuel Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) requirements;
            (3) the potential for cost savings through regulatory 
        changes related to the transition from winter to summer fuel 
        mixes; and
            (4) any other areas that the Secretary believes that 
        regulations could be streamlined or improved to alleviate high 
        fuel prices.
The Secretary shall submit a report to Congress containing the results 
of such study within 90 days after the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
3.12 U.S. RESERVE ASSETS

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2004 2005 2006

2007

Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.p

1 Total ................................. 86,824 65,127 65,895 66,720 66,008 66,127 67,029 67,508 69,070 69,626 70,966

2 Gold stock1 ............................ 11,045 11,043 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041

3 Special drawing rights2,3 ................. 13,582 8,210 8,870 9,030 9,002 9,018 9,111 9,157 9,301 9,392 9,536

4 Reserve position in International Monetary Fund2 ............................ 19,479 8,036 5,040 4,553 4,481 4,573 4,369 4,388 4,463 4,394 4,416

5 Foreign currencies4 ..................... 42,718 37,838 40,943 42,095 41,483 41,495 42,508 42,922 44,266 44,800 45,973

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF have also been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2004 2005 2006

2007

Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.p

1 Deposits .............................. 80 83 98 95 93 197 94 94 112 601 97

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 1,041,215 1,069,014 1,133,969 1,195,672 1,198,639 1,211,812 1,226,784 1,173,166 1,179,525 1,195,592 1,191,855

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,872 8,832 8,825 8,791 8,764 8,737 8,724 8,724

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
#### J. W. DUNN v. V. A. ANDERSON et al.

No. 31785.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 10, 1935.

J. E. Galloway, of Gulfport, for appellant. White & Morse, of Gulfport, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 31, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 13, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00588

- CR

Thomas Peter CORTEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR9005

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due on April 8, 2022 and was not filed. On April 12, 2022, appellant’s appointed counsel, Richard E. Langlois, filed a motion in this court requesting to withdraw as appellate counsel for medical reasons. After consideration, we GRANT counsel’s motion. Because appellant is indigent, new appellate counsel must be appointed.

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal ABATED and REMANDED to the trial court for appointment of new appellate counsel by April 28, 2022

. See Duncan v. State , 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). We further ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order appointing new appellate counsel in this court by M ay 13, 2022

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of April, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... n.a. 8 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
---

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41992
          44
          7
          11
          16
          10
          .232
          .038
          .058
          .079
          .0491993
          24
          2
          4
          7
          11
          .121
          .010
          .018
          .035
          .0541994
          10
          1
          1
          3
          6
          .048
          .003
          .003
          .013
          .0261995
          12
          0
          3
          6
          4
          .055
          -.001
          .011
          .027
          .0161996
          7
          0
          1
          2
          4
          .031
          .000
          .003
          .009
          .0171997
          16
          -1
          0
          3
          14
          .064
          -.003
          -.001
          .010
          .0541998
          6
          -1
          3
          0
          5
          .022
          -.004
          .009
          .000
          .0161999
          15
          0
          3
          5
          7
          .051
          -.001
          .011
          .015
          .0222000
          12
          -12
          3
          8
          14
          .037
          -.037
          .009
          .022
          .0402001
          42
          10
          9
          5
          17
          .123
          .030
          .027
          .014
          .0492002
          35
          8
          6
          5
          16
          .097
          .022
          .017
          .014
          .0412003
          n.a.
          4
          6
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .010
          .015
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 30, 2003