alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1866

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis for granting

requests for reexamination of patents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2001

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis

for granting requests for reexamination of patents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW QUES4 TION OF PATENTABILITY IN REEXAMINATION

5 PROCEEDINGS.

6 Sections 303(a) and 313(a) title 35, United States

7 Code, are each amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: ‘‘The existence of a substantial new question of

9 patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent
2

•HR 1866 IH

1 or printed publication was previously cited by or to the

2 Office.’’.

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with

5 respect to determinations of the Director of the United

6 States Patent and Trademark Office that are made under

7 section 303(a) or 313(a) of title 35, United States Code,

8 on and after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven J. Roy

v. Civil No. 02-cv-555-JD

Phil Stanley, et al.

O R D E R

 Defendant is ordered to provide plaintiff with copies of

Exhibits 13, 14 and 15 to the Motion for Summary Judgment in a

form he is permitted to have and can use in prison within five

(5) days of this order or they will be struck from the record. 

Counsel’s certification is due on or before July 22, 2005. 

Counsel is to show cause why Exhibit 2 and the ex parte offender

record should not be struck as an improper effort to influence

the court since they are not even mentioned in the defendant’s

memorandum and thus have no relevance. 

Plaintiff’s motion to seal (document no. 99) these exhibits 

is granted to the extent of the above rulings and otherwise is

denied. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 15, 2005

Case 1:02-cv-00555-JD Document 104 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 2
2

cc: Steven J. Roy, pro se

 Mary E. Maloney, Esq.

Case 1:02-cv-00555-JD Document 104 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of M Power Entertainment, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (FKA GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary F. Kimmons,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
     Company.

/s/ Gary F. Kimmons
_____________________________________
Gary F. Kimmons
Chief Financial Officer
December 9, 2005
H. R. 1761

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8588 Richmond

Highway in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herb Harris Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

8588 Richmond Highway in Alexandria, Virginia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Herb Harris Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Herb Harris

Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 1998


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Raymond H . Douville

Criminal No . 08-cr-97-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

9) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : October 15, 200 8

cc : Jeffrey Levin, Esq .

Mark Zuckerman, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00097-JD Document 10 Filed 10/15/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-31-01-SM

Nicole Gennell

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 17) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file

a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than April 30, 2008. On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:08-cr-00031-SM Document 18 Filed 04/23/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: May 30, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

April 23, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Terry Ollila, Esq.

 Kevin Sharkey, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00031-SM Document 18 Filed 04/23/08 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1886 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1886

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for appeals by third 
          parties in certain patent reexamination proceedings.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1886

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for appeals by third 
          parties in certain patent reexamination proceedings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPEALS IN INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS.

    (a) Appeals by Third-Party Requester in Proceedings.--Section 
315(b) of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Third-Party Requester.--A third-party requester--
            ``(1) may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and 
        may appeal under the provisions of sections 141 through 144, 
        with respect to any final decision favorable to the 
        patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim 
        of the patent; and
            ``(2) may, subject to subsection (c), be a party to any 
        appeal taken by the patent owner under the provisions of 
        section 134 or sections 141 through 144.''.
    (b) Appeal to Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.--Section 
134(c) of title 35, United States Code, is amended by striking the last 
sentence.
    (c) Appeal to Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.--Section 
141 of title 35, United States Code, is amended in the third sentence 
by inserting ``, or a third-party requester in an inter partes 
reexamination proceeding, who is'' after ``patent owner''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act apply with respect to any 
reexamination proceeding commenced on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, November 1-5, 2Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,066,990 9,062 258,059 455,228 257,265 59,013 1,05Number of loans 16,922 300 2,011 8,802 3,961 1,011 Weighted average maturity (months)1 18.72 4.51 13.05 18.65 26.86 9.44 8.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.28 2.30 9.22 2.20 3.91 .32 .Weighted average risk rating3 3.10 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 nWeighted average interest rate 4 5.16 5.59 4.92 5.16 5.25 5.76 5.

 Standard error5 .26 .53 .40 .25 .32 .76 1.0

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 5.96 6.64 5.92 6.18 6.16 5.64 6.4 25th percentile 4.08 4.07 3.99 3.82 4.33 4.85 4. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.45 7.13 5.82 5.19 4.99 5.54 3.9 Other livestock 4.58 3.82 4.26 5.57 4.61 6.12 6. Other current operating expenses7 5.34 6.07 4.79 5.37 5.25 6.19 8.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.33 2.94 5.08 5.05 5.77 5.39 n Farm real estate 6.06 n.a. 4.81 6.35 6.23 5.78 n Other8 4.66 4.64 4.97 4.53 4.51 5.19 5.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 82.01 42.17 42.94 94.16 97.82 97.63 95.4 Under commitment 86.11 98.19 88.15 81.12 89.36 97.47 100.0 Callable 29.58 34.78 71.86 21.79 8.47 2.43 6.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 14.69 12.11 25.76 15.34 7.13 1.25 19. Other livestock 12.18 10.65 31.81 5.21 8.13 3.56 14. Other current operating expenses7 34.00 53.71 21.07 35.08 43.08 45.67 14.

 Farm machinery and equipment 11.75 1.81 .52 15.01 15.99 22.51 n Farm real estate 6.20 n.a. 3.81 5.68 10.43 4.51 n Other8 21.18 21.71 17.02 23.67 15.25 22.50 52.0

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 6.55 8.59 3.13 5.34 9.07 1.59 4.5 Other 87.43 89.68 91.77 85.28 89.36 95.19 90.7 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 150

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain

disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic device.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. PETRI (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, and Ms. SLAUGHTER) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

require certain disclosure and reports relating to polling

by telephone or electronic device.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO

4 POLLING BY TELEPHONE OR ELECTRONIC

5 DEVICE.

6 Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

7 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new section:
2

HR 150 IH

1 ‘‘DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO POLLING BY

2 TELEPHONE OR ELECTRONIC DEVICE

3 ‘‘SEC. 323. (a) Any person who conducts a Federal

4 election poll by telephone or electronic device shall disclose

5 to each respondent the identity of the person paying the

6 expenses of the poll. The disclosure shall be made at the

7 end of the interview involved.

8 ‘‘(b) In the case of any Federal election poll by tele9 phone or electronic device—

10 ‘‘(1) if the results are not to be made public,

11 the person who conducts the poll shall report to the

12 Commission the total cost of the poll and all sources

13 of funds for the poll; and

14 ‘‘(2) the person who conducts the poll shall re15 port to the Commission the total number of house16 holds contacted and include with such report a copy

17 of the poll questions.

18 ‘‘(c) As used in this section, the term ‘Federal elec19 tion poll’ means a survey—

20 ‘‘(1) in which the respondent is asked to state

21 a preference in a future election for Federal office;

22 and

23 ‘‘(2) in which more than 1,200 households are

24 surveyed.’’.

Æ
International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1997 1998 1999

2000 2001

Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar.p

1 Deposits .............................. 457 167 71 78 139 115 104 215 199 196 70

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 620,885 607,574 632,482 628,001 611,641 595,591 591,071 594,094 594,694 603,906 609,440

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 10,763 10,343 9,933 9,674 9,620 9,565 9,505 9,451 9,397 9,343 9,289

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1993: Q2... 100 * 4.00 14.00 22.00 18.00 16.00 20.00 5.00 1.00 * * * * * 1994: Q2... 100 4.00 4.00 23.00 21.00 22.00 20.00 4.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * * 1995: Q2... 100 * * 3.00 14.00 11.00 35.00 24.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 * * .01 * 1996: Q2... 100 * 14.00 14.00 19.00 15.00 18.00 15.00 3.00 1.00 .01 .01 * .01 * 1997: Q2... 100 * .01 6.00 11.00 20.00 30.00 21.00 9.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1998: Q2... 100 * .01 3.00 14.00 31.00 30.00 14.00 7.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q2... 100 .01 4.00 4.00 12.00 37.00 30.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 * * 2000: Q2... 100 .01 .01 .01 4.00 19.00 36.00 27.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2001: Q2... 100 .01 3.00 8.00 29.00 31.00 22.00 5.00 2.00 .39 .07 .03 .01 * * 2002: Q2... 100 23.24 22.45 17.77 22.77 10.15 2.75 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2003: Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * * 2004: Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * * 2001: Q3... 100 1.10 9.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 12.00 3.00 1.00 .26 .01 * * * *  Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00  Q2... 100 23.24 22.45 17.77 22.77 10.15 2.75 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00  Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * *  Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * *  Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * *  Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * *  Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * *  Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * *  Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 446,787 22,628 40,908 61,357 72,780 84,18Number of loans 12,479 5,776 3,004 1,760 1,076 59Weighted average maturity (months)1 24.52 7.83 14.67 16.52 35.44 14.0

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 9.90 3.96 7.14 8.93 18.22 7.2

Weighted average risk rating3 2.04 2.21 2.08 2.45 2.37 2.1

Weighted average interest rate4 6.73 7.17 6.86 7.00 6.88 6.3

 Standard error5 .23 .07 .24 .30 .21 .4 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.50 7.73 7.80 7.81 7.25 6.9 25th percentile 6.15 6.35 6.15 6.11 6.14 5.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.49 7.65 7.43 6.11 7.15 5.9 Other livestock 7.04 7.10 7.14 7.57 6.51 7.5 Other current operating expenses7 7.16 7.14 6.75 6.94 7.16 6.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.90 7.43 7.31 7.54 5.88 6.2 Farm real estate 6.34 6.42 6.43 6.27 6.72 5.7 Other8 7.88 6.96 6.96 7.13 6.83 6.9

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 49.77 48.77 35.52 44.82 28.62 44.6 Under commitment 64.78 63.09 57.17 45.66 38.24 58.4 Callable 16.15 15.63 19.15 11.90 19.48 14.8 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 19.36 6.46 8.09 9.80 9.30 50.1 Other livestock 10.27 11.95 8.46 14.93 19.89 6.7 Other current operating expenses7 49.30 71.20 66.53 53.19 46.89 30.1

 Farm machinery and equipment 3.75 5.44 5.93 10.63 5.85 2.7 Farm real estate 13.25 .47 5.92 4.85 12.97 7.5 Other8 4.06 4.48 5.07 6.60 5.10 2.6

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 18.50 4.61 5.40 10.78 23.22 21.3 Other 78.73 81.94 85.54 83.82 73.64 78.6 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

AMY PHILBRICK, LLC . ,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No: 06-cv-256

v.

SN NIOBE, Official No. ME5800S,

her engines, machinery, equipment,

masts, etc., in rem ; and

The Estate of Stephen Woods,

State of New Hampshire, and Deborah

Woods in personam,

Defendants.

ORDER OF NOTICE

This action being an admiralty claim within the provisions of Rule 9(h) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule C of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, in the event that the SN

NIOBE, Official No. ME5800S, is not released within ten (10) days after execution of

process:

1 . It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff cause to be published within twenty

(20) days after execution of process in the Manchester Union Leader the Notice or Notices

(as applicable) attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein .

2. It is further ORDERED, pursuant to 46 U .S.C. Section 31325, that Notice of this

suit be provided (1) to the master or individual in charge of the SN NIOBE, Official No .

ME5800S, or to the owner; and (2) to any person, firm, or corporation that has recorded a

mortgage pursuant to 46 U .S.C. Section 31321 or who has filed a Notice of Lien as of the

Case 1:06-cv-00254-JD Document 10 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
date of this Order of any undischarged lien, by mailing by certified mail, return receipt

requested, a copy of the within Notice or Notices (as applicable), such mailing to be made

within (10) days after execution of process .

DATED at Concord, New Hampshire, this day of 12006 .

Judge, United States District Court

2

17th July /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Case 1:06-cv-00254-JD Document 10 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alfredo ROMERO-CASTRO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50143.

D.C. No. CR-00-03202-TJW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*337Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.*

Decided March 12, 2003.

Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Alfredo Romero-Castro appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960.

Romero-Castro’s contention that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is facially unconstitutional following *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and that *United States v. Harris,*536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), overrules *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.) (en banc), *cert. denied,*535 U.S. 1105, 122 S.Ct. 2314, 152 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2002), and *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 573, 154 L.Ed.2d 459 (2002), is foreclosed by *United States v. Hernandez,*322 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2003). Romero-Castro’s conviction is

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Fannie M. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WABASH MAGNETICS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1916.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 6, 2003.

Decided March 13, 2003.

Fannie M. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. William David Paxton, M. Beth Colling, Gentry Locke Rakes *&*Moore, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Fannie M. Harris appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Harris v. Wabash Magnetics, Inc.,*No. CA-01-22-4 (WJD.Va. July 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Thomas P. Cossette

v. Civil No. 08-cv-21-JL

NH, State of

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated February 17, 2009, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

March 13, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Jeanne Vanim-Botting, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00021-JL Document 9 Filed 03/13/09 Page 1 of 1