alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,987,915              10,987,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              150,535,072             150,535,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,738,992               1,738,992
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         439,751                 439,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                 143,549                 143,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,160,613             165,160,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       82,820,990              82,820,990
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        96,650                  96,650
<OTHER-SE>                                  82,242,973              82,242,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,160,613             165,160,613
<SALES>                                      5,536,637              10,067,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,841,265              10,758,997
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,422,901               3,289,384
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               250,000                 400,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,968,569               3,101,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,199,795               3,967,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                   749,956               1,397,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,449,839               2,570,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,449,839               2,570,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21                     .40
<EPS-DILUTED><F1>                                  .21                     .39
<FN>
<F1>DILUTED EPS CHANGED DUE TO NEW CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES 
OUTSTANDING UNDER FASB 128
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      25,687,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,295,140
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,107,847
<PP&E>                                         909,555
<DEPRECIATION>                               (411,052)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,633,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,404,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,544
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,633,056
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,538,990
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,214,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               297,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                324,630
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,719
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            324,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   282,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
Picture 4  EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS  We hereby consent to the use of the name Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., the references to our report of CoJax Oil and Gas Corporation's proved oil and natural gas reserves estimates and future net revenue as of December 31, 2022, and the inclusion of our corresponding report letter, dated May 22, 2023, in the 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report") of CoJax Oil and Gas Corporation.   NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.  /s/ Richard B. Talley, Jr. By: Richard B. Talley, Jr., P.E. Chief Executive Officer   Houston, Texas November 17, 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-223-PB

Benjamin Guernsey

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 1, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time for defendant to complete a psychological

evaluation and treatment program which he is currently enrolled

in and prepare a defense. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date for 30 days.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 1, 2007 to June 5, 2007. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00223-PB Document 13 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 19, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

May 24, 2007 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED. 

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 20, 2007

cc: Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00223-PB Document 13 Filed 04/20/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1217408
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1458797
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   41048499
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        16422664
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          16610015
<LOANS>                                       46436493
<ALLOWANCE>                                     200000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               110590113
<DEPOSITS>                                    67208111
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2042942
<LONG-TERM>                                     685801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25921
<OTHER-SE>                                    40627338
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               110590113
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 926067
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               886450
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 82131
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1935648
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              738166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              753831
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1181817
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 734787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 665265
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      665265
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    403305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.50
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     13000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                200000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               200000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            200000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Trinity Lynn Roberts, * From the 35th District

 Court of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CR19796.

Vs. No. 11-11-00268-CR * August 15, 2013

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1993...... 9.2 7.3 9.6 8.3 30.4 9.4 8.5 10.0 11.1 7.4 1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2001: Q2... 11.8 8.1 16.9 10.2 14.0 12.8 11.1 11.9 12.5 11.6  Q3... 11.0 6.8 10.7 8.6 32.3 11.3 9.1 11.2 11.8 10.9  Q4... 10.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 31.4 9.9 7.6 11.1 12.1 10.3 2002: Q1... 11.7 9.3 9.7 10.9 29.8 10.8 10.0 12.4 14.6 10.3  Q2... 13.4 11.3 19.6 10.6 27.7 16.8 10.2 12.6 14.2 13.8  Q3... 9.9 6.3 8.0 9.8 12.7 10.6 9.4 9.4 10.6 9.7  Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3  Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2002: Q3... 58 33 9 34 60 6 55 4

 Q4... 48 22 30 27 56 17 46 32003: Q1... 52 27 20 30 52 18 53 3 Q2... 28 50 22 19 65 16 34 5 Q3... 28 47 25 17 70 13 31 6 Q4... 8 33 59 6 61 33 16 52004: Q1... 7 25 68 5 52 43 8 4 Q2... 2 37 61 2 55 42 5 4 Q3... 15 47 38 5 63 33 10 5

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2002: Q3... 70 27 3 33 56 11 65 3

 Q4... 63 30 8 40 50 9 65 32003: Q1... 72 24 5 44 48 8 68 3 Q2... 36 47 17 27 60 13 46 4 Q3... 22 46 32 18 68 15 36 4 Q4... 17 35 48 10 64 25 20 52004: Q1... 11 42 47 8 68 25 16 5 Q2... 11 49 40 9 65 26 15 6 Q3... 11 51 38 6 71 23 12 6

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2002: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.2003: Q1... 57 22 22 52 30 17 52 3 Q2... 50 35 15 46 46 8 58 2 Q3... 46 38 17 33 63 4 46 4 Q4... 30 22 48 17 70 13 26 32004: Q1... 18 55 27 14 73 14 27 5 Q2... 13 43 43 0 70 30 22 4 Q3... 5 36 59 0 73 27 9 4 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Duncan J. McNeil, III

v. Case No. 05-fp-433

United States, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff has been enjoined from further filings with this

court without leave of court. The filing of December 19, 2005 is

a continuation of his vexatious litigant filings. The filing is

rejected and is not to be accepted by the Clerk. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 18, 2006

cc: Duncan J. McNeil, III, pro se

Case 1:05-fp-00433 Document 6 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
                 (in thousands, except share and per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended                  Six Months Ended
                                                             -------------------------------    ------------------------------
                                                             June 30, 1998     June 30, 1997    June 30, 1998    June 30, 1997
                                                             -------------     -------------    -------------    -------------
                                                                                (restated)                        (restated)
<S>                                                          <C>               <C>              <C>              <C>           
Net Loss                                                     $      (5,043)    $        (790)   $      (3,727)   $        (648)
                                                             =============     =============    =============    =============


                                                            NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC

Weighted average common shares  - Basic                         12,946,624         9,283,078       12,946,624        8,991,412
                                                             =============     =============    =============    =============


Net loss per share - Basic                                   $       (0.39)    $       (0.09)   $       (0.29)   $       (0.07)
                                                             =============     =============    =============    =============


                                                           NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED

Shares used in this computation:
  Weighted average common shares  - Basic                       12,946,624         9,283,078       12,946,624        8,991,412
  Dilutive effect of shares under employee stock plans (*)              --                --               --               -- 
                                                             -------------     -------------    -------------    -------------

  Weighted average common shares - Diluted                      12,946,624         9,283,078       12,946,624        8,991,412
                                                             =============     =============    =============    =============


Net loss per share - Diluted                                 $       (0.39)    $       (0.09)   $       (0.29)   $       (0.07)
                                                             =============     =============    =============    =============
</TABLE>



(*) Common stock equivalents were not included as their effect would be
anti-dilutive
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2018-B (the "Exchange
Act periodic reports");
2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided
under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4.
I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the
compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities,
required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18, have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
report on Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee.
Date:  March 25, 2019
/s/ Brian T. Stevens
Name: Brian T. Stevens
Title: Vice President and Controller
(senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Omar Hervis

Criminal No. 06-cr-208-01-04-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

45) filed by defendant Omar Hervis is granted. Trial is continued

as to all defendants unless an objection is filed by January 17,

2007.

Defendants shall file waivers of speedy trial rights within

10 days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: January 12, 2007

cc: Ash Joshi, Esq.

John Pendleton, Esq.

Scott Kalisch, Esq.

Sven Wiberg, Esq.

James Gleason, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00208-JD Document 46 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 154 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 154

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase to 100 percent 
  the amount of the deduction for the health insurance costs of self-
                         employed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

Mr. Pomeroy (for himself and Mr. McHugh) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase to 100 percent 
  the amount of the deduction for the health insurance costs of self-
                         employed individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Self-Employed Health Affordability 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR 100 PERCENT OF HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-
              EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Allowance of deduction.--In the case of an individual 
        who is an employee within the meaning of section 401(c)(1), 
        there shall be allowed as a deduction under this section an 
        amount equal to 100 percent of the amount paid during the 
        taxable year for insurance which constitutes medical care for 
        the taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael Leon Hammell

V .

Lakes Region FacilitV, Warden

No . 06-fp-17 6

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-176-SM .

SO ORDERED .

R . Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judg e

Date : May 15, 200 6

cc : Michael Leon Hammell, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00176-SM Document 3 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 1