alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin T. Michaels, Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                       
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 5, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Kevin T. Michaels Chief Financial Officer Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

George Wassouf,

v. Civil No. 07-cv-334-SM

United States of America

O R D E R

Petitioner seeks relief from his conviction and sentence

under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. His asserted grounds

are, in general, that mental health difficulties rendered his

guilty plea to bank fraud improvident; that a term of five years

of supervised release violated his binding plea agreement; and

that he should have been warned that immigration consequences

might flow from his guilty plea.

The issues petitioner seeks to raise are without merit, but

his petition must be dismissed for a different, more preliminary

reason. Petitioner filed a direct appeal of his conviction and

sentence (after earlier § 2255 relief was granted to him). That

appeal was resolved by mandate issued by the United States Court

of Appeals for the First Circuit on October 5, 2005. The time in

which to file a petition for certiorari expired on January 5,

2005.

Case 1:07-cv-00334-SM Document 4 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Petitioner had one year from “the date on which judgment of

conviction [became] final in which to file his petition for

relief under § 2255. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Para. 6. That date was

January 5, 2006, but this petition was not filed until October 4,

2007, far beyond the deadline. Petitioner does not suggest any

bases upon which his petition might be timely under other

provisions of § 2255, and the court does not recognize any.

The petition is necessarily dismissed as untimely.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

January 28, 2008

cc: George Wassouf, pro se

Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00334-SM Document 4 Filed 01/28/08 Page 2 of 2
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2001: Q4... 49 39 12 29 64 7 57 3

2002: Q1... 8 32 60 16 63 21 10 3 Q2... 58 41 2 19 68 12 49 4 Q3... 58 33 9 34 60 6 55 4 Q4... 48 22 30 27 56 17 46 32003: Q1... 52 27 20 30 52 18 53 3 Q2... 28 50 22 19 65 16 34 5 Q3... 28 47 25 17 70 13 31 6 Q4... 8 33 59 6 61 33 16 5

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2001: Q4... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

2002: Q1... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  Q2... 65 33 2 35 54 11 63 3 Q3... 70 27 3 33 56 11 65 3 Q4... 63 30 8 40 50 9 65 32003: Q1... 72 24 5 44 48 8 68 3 Q2... 36 47 17 27 59 13 46 4 Q3... 22 46 32 18 68 15 36 4 Q4... 17 35 48 10 64 25 20 5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2001: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n. Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n. Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n. Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.2003: Q1... 57 22 22 52 30 17 52 3 Q2... 50 35 15 46 46 8 58 2 Q3... 46 38 17 33 63 4 46 4 Q4... 29 25 46 17 71 13 25 4 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his/her knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
-------------------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
April 10, 2007


/S/ MOMOKO A. BERAN
-------------------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
April 10, 2007

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22550]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-552-801]


Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam: Extension of Time Limits for the Preliminary Results of the 
New Shipper Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Ray, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5403.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 7, 2008, the Department published a notice of initiation 
of new shipper reviews of certain frozen fish fillets from the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam covering the period August 1, 2007, 
through January 31, 2008. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 
Shipper Reviews, 73 FR 18753, (April 7, 2008). The preliminary results 
are currently due no later than September 22, 2008.

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
``Act''), provides that the Department will issue the preliminary 
results of a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order within 180 
days after the day on which the review was initiated. See also 19 CFR 
351.214 (i)(1). The Act further provides that the Department may extend 
that 180-day period to 300 days if it determines that the case is 
extraordinarily complicated. See 19 CFR 351.214 (i)(2).

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results

    The Department determines that these new shipper reviews involve 
extraordinarily complicated methodological issues such as the use of 
intermediate input methodology, the examination of importer 
information, and the evaluation of the bona fide nature of each 
company's sales. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the Department is extending the 
time limit for these preliminary results by 120 days, until no later 
than January 20, 2009. The final results continue to be due 90 days 
after the publication of the preliminary results.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22550 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Walter D. Wick

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00180-JL

Mark Schols

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

August 4, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00180-JL Document 21 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 29, 2008

cc: Steven E. Grill, Esq.

Gordon J. MacDonald, Esq.

Henry E. Kinser, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00180-JL Document 21 Filed 07/29/08 Page 2 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

BETH TAYLOR, * 

N/F of K.S., a Minor, * No. 16-1382V 

 * Special Master Christian J. Moran

 Petitioner, * 

v. * 

 * Filed: May 30, 2017 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 

In a status report filed on March 24, 2017, the petitioner requested that her case be 

dismissed pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(A). As the petitioner pointed out, the Secretary has 

not filed a report in this case. 

Accordingly, the following is ORDERED:

1. The case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed that a 

judgment shall not enter pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(c). 

2. If the petitioner files a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, the petitioner must 

establish subject matter jurisdiction. At that time, the issues raised in the Secretary’s 

April 24, 2017 motion to dismiss will be considered. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Christian J. Moran 

 Christian J. Moran 

 Special Master 

 1

 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1570


Approval of Manufacturing Authority, Within Foreign-Trade Zone 
38, Spartanburg County, SC, Kittel Supplier USA, Inc. (Automotive Roof/
Luggage Racks)

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the South Carolina State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 
38, has requested authority under Section 400.28 (a)(2) of the Board's 
regulations on behalf of Kittel Supplier USA, Inc., to assemble 
automotive roof/luggage racks under FTZ procedures within FTZ 38 Site 
3, Duncan, South Carolina (FTZ Docket 4-2008, filed 1-28-2008);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (73 FR 7250, 2-7-2008);
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for the assembly 
of automotive roof/luggage racks within FTZ 38 for Kittel Supplier USA, 
Inc., as described in the application and Federal Register notice, 
subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of September 2008.

David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce,for Import Administration,Alternate 
Chairman,Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22461 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS MARIO SERRANO-PEREZ,

AKA Ariel Saldovar-Perez, AKA James

Serrano, AKA Jesus Serrano, AKA Jesus

M. Serrano,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50058

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00883-SJO-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Mario Serrano-Perez appeals from his 60-month sentence, imposed

after his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States after having

FILED

JUL 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We decline to review Serrano-Perez’s ineffective assistance of counsel

1

claim because the record is not sufficiently developed to permit review on direct

appeal. See United States v. Leasure, 319 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2003).

2 11-50058

been previously removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Serrano-Perez’s counsel has filed a brief stating

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.1

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Charles Glenn

v. Civil No. 05-cv-074-JD

United States of America

PROCEDURAL ORDER

In this Section 2255 petition, the petitioner claims that he

was not informed by his attorney that he had the right to testify

and that it was his intention to testify in his own behalf at

trial but was prevented from doing so by his attorney. 

An evidentiary hearing shall be scheduled on these issues. 

Attorney Paul Haley, who represented the petitioner at

sentencing, is appointed to represent him at this hearing.

Petitioner’s former trial attorney Richard Foley shall be

present at the hearing. A copy of this order and of the

defendant’s petition, together with the memorandum and affidavit

attached thereto shall be forwarded to Attorneys Haley and Foley.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

June 29, 2005

cc: Charles Glenn, pro se

Peter E. Papps, Esquire

Richard N. Foley, Esquire

Paul J. Haley, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00074-JD Document 7 Filed 06/29/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rosemary A. Gilroy

v. Civil No. 07-74-JD

Ameriquest Mortgage Company

PROCEDURAL ORDER

The final pretrial conference was held on this date. During

the conference the plaintiff requested that the trial of this

matter be postponed due to the fact that her mother was admitted

to a nursing home today and she wanted to spend time with her to

help her adjust to her new situation.

The plaintiff shall file with the court, under seal, a

letter from the Administrator of the facility to which the

plaintiff's mother was admitted stating the date on which she was

admitted. Said letter shall be filed by March 20, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

March 9, 2009

cc: Rosemary A. Gilroy, pro se

Thomas C. Tretter, Esquire

Case 1:07-cv-00074-JD Document 100 Filed 03/09/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Appendix A to item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Article 5 of Regulation S-X
(in thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           3,148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    208,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,364
<PP&E>                                         188,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           385
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,479
<SALES>                                        365,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,634
<CGS>                                          224,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,314
<INCOME-TAX>                                       972
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                      57,412,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,069,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                   877,344
<INVENTORY>                                  9,548,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            83,221,816
<PP&E>                                      12,617,168
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,262,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,266,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,145,229
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    65,863,649
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,145,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,266,842
<SALES>                                     22,650,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,650,113
<CGS>                                       13,795,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,019,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,475,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,268,615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,207,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,207,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James Covington

v. 06-cv-416-PB

Blaine Hawkes, et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 26, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

February 23, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: James Covington, Pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00416-PB Document 7 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

CHARLES SWIFT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TAYLOR MCHUGH,

Defendant.

8:23CV240

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Charles Swift, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in 

Forma Pauperis. Filing No. 2. Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court finds that 

Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is 

granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised 

that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his 

claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 9th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00240-JFB-PRSE Doc # 5 Filed: 06/09/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 9