alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1963 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1963

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route taken by 
   American soldier and frontiersman George Rogers Clark and his men 
during the Revolutionary War to capture the British forts at Kaskaskia 
and Cahokia, Illinois, and Vincennes, Indiana, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1963

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route taken by 
   American soldier and frontiersman George Rogers Clark and his men 
during the Revolutionary War to capture the British forts at Kaskaskia 
and Cahokia, Illinois, and Vincennes, Indiana, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GEORGE ROGERS CLARK NORTHWEST CAMPAIGN TRAIL 
              FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS 
              SYSTEM.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(41) George Rogers Clark Northwest Campaign Trail.--The George 
Rogers Clark Northwest Campaign Trail, tracing the water route and 
overland route of the 1778 and 1779 expedition of Lieutenant Colonel 
George Rogers Clark and his Virginia militia against the British in 
which he captured the British forts at Kaskaskia and Cahokia, in what 
is now Illinois, and twice captured Vincennes, in what is now 
Indiana.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 16 (legislative day, MAY 15), 2001

Received

AN ACT

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for

consistent treatment of survivor benefits for public safety

officers killed in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1727 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Hero Survivor

3 Benefit Fairness Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF SURVIVOR BENEFITS

5 FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED IN

6 THE LINE OF DUTY.

7 Subsection (b) of section 1528 of the Taxpayer Relief

8 Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–34) is amended by striking

9 the period and inserting ‘‘, and to amounts received in

10 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001, with re11 spect to individuals dying on or before December 31,

12 1996.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Solar
      & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
      31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date: April 8,
      2008




/s/ Deli
                DuBy:
                Deli Du,
              Chief
                Executive Officer and President
              (principal
                executive officer)





/s/ Yihai
                YangBy:
                Yihai Yang
              Chief
                Financial Officer (principal financial
              officer
                and accounting officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by China
      Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Estate of Mercer K. Ellington, Deceased, Appellant, v American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Defendant. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Interpleader Plaintiff, v Mercedes Ellington et al., Interpleaded Defendants-Respondents.

[809 NYS2d 10]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered May 13, 2004, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the interpleaded defendants-respondents, Mercedes Ellington, Gaye Ellington and Edward Ellington for summary judgment, declaring that they are entitled, retroactive to January 2002, to receive 60% (in the amount of 20% each) of the “songwriter’s share” of royalties that the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) or any nonparty music publishing companies have collected, or will collect, on any works of Duke Ellington and Mercer Ellington falling within the scope of the 1989 assignment contract, and declaring that the Estate of Mercer Ellington is not entitled to any of the aforementioned royalties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no proof that the agreement at issue was an illegal contract designed to evade, as opposed to avoid, taxes, nor is there proof that any taxes owed were actually evaded. In any event, if the contract were illegal, it would constitute no more than an act malum prohibitum, for which forfeiture is disfavored *(see Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc.,*80 NY2d 124, 127 [1992]).

The agreement is clear on its face, so that resort to extrinsic evidence was unnecessary to ascertain its meaning, and inasmuch as it provided for the irrevocable transfer of the future royalties and was signed by the donees, the conditions precedent for an inter vivos gift were met, and the agreement does not constitute an illegal testamentary substitute *(see Gruen v*
      *427
      *Gruen,*68 NY2d 48, 53 [1986]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB   Document 13   Filed 10/07/09   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB   Document 13   Filed 10/07/09   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB   Document 13   Filed 10/07/09   Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Cadema Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2002.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Caredata.com, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2000.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of Cadema Corp. and Caredata.com, Inc. is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 16, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 29, 2008.

By the Commission.

Florence E. Harmon,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-21938 Filed 9-16-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Broderick Hart, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 681]

*816Kane, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered May 7, 2003, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, robbery in the third degree and criminal mischief in the second degree.

Defendant severely assaulted his ex-girlfriend’s daughter, including hitting her with a hammer, and destroyed the contents of their home. After defendant’s arrest and arraignment, a grand jury considered the evidence against defendant and handed up an indictment. Following trial, the jury acquitted defendant of attempted murder and convicted him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, robbery in the third degree and criminal mischief in the second degree. Defendant appeals.

The indictment by the grand jury superceded the criminal court information and the proceedings before the local criminal court; the grand jury had the authority to indict regardless of any alleged defects in the earlier accusatory instrument or proceedings *(see People v Winch,*50 AD2d 948, 948 [1975]; *People v Meachem,*50 AD2d 953, 953 [1975]; *People v Wright,*28 AD2d 602, 602 [1967]). The indictment was properly obtained and vested County Court with jurisdiction over defendant *(see*CPL 210.05).

Contrary to defendant’s argument, the indictment properly charged him with attempted murder. Although the transcript of the grand jury proceedings does not include the results of the vote as to the attempted murder count, there is no statutory requirement that vote results be recorded in the minutes *(compare*CPL 190.25 [6] [instructions on the law must be included in grand jury minutes]). The grand jury’s vote sheet, reviewed by this Court as a confidential exhibit, lists unanimous votes to indict on each count, including the attempted murder count, and the indictment containing the attempted murder count was certified as a true bill by the foreperson *(see*CPL 200.50 [8]). Hence, the documentary proof establishes that the grand jury duly indicted defendant on one count of attempted murder, in addition to other counts *(see*CPL 190.25 [1]; 200.50; *cf. People v Duchowney,*166 AD2d 769, 770 [1990]). Since attempted murder was duly included in the indictment, County Court properly permitted the People to present evidence regarding that crime.

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1925

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility

of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, as a

unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 21, 2001

Mr. EDWARDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability

and feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site

Area in Waco, Texas, as a unit of the National Park

System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING WACO MAM4 MOTH SITE AREA.

5 (a) STUDY.—Not later than 6 months after funds are

6 first made available for this section, the Secretary of the

7 Interior shall complete a study regarding the suitability

8 and feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site
2

•HR 1925 IH

1 Area located in the city of Waco, Texas, as a unit of the

2 National Park System.

3 (b) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section

4 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall

5 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required

6 by this section.

7 (c) SUBMISSION OF STUDY RESULTS.—Not later

8 than 30 days after completion of the study required under

9 subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Com10 mittee on Resources of the House of Representatives and

11 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the

12 Senate a report describing the results of the study.

Æ
Exhibit 32

ISONICS CORPORATION        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350  Principal Executive Officer

To
my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2004, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

March 16,
2004

|/s/ James E. AlexanderJames E. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350  Principal Financial Officer

To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2004, containing financial statements for the
period then ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

March 16,
2004

|/s/ John SakysJohn Sakys, Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                             NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.
                                 2003 STOCK PLAN

         WHEREAS, Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (the "Corporation") previously adopted
the 2003 Stock Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation is authorized to
amend the Plan and has authorized an amendment to the Plan, as described below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVED, that Section 19 of the Plan is hereby
amended, effective as of May 12, 2004, to read as follows:

         SECTION 19. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM OF PLAN.

                  19.1     Effective Date.

                  The Plan has been adopted and authorized by the Board for
         submission to the stockholders of the Company. The Plan shall become
         effective as of the date the Plan is approved by the stockholders of
         the Company.

                  19.2     Term of Plan.

                  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no
         Awards shall be granted on or after the 10th anniversary of the Plan's
         effective date as determined in Section 19.1 above.

         This First Amendment has been executed by the Corporation, by its duly
authorized officer, as of this 11th day of February, 2004.

                                     NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.

                                     By: /s/ Dale L. Matschullat

                                     Title: Vice President - General Counsel and
                                                Corporate Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         188,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,248,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (251,393)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,406,757
<PP&E>                                         442,629
<DEPRECIATION>                               (108,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,796,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,238,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,432,257
<COMMON>                                     4,155,592
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,029,449)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,796,437
<SALES>                                      2,401,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,401,981
<CGS>                                        2,565,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,565,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,648,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              92,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,904,772)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,907,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,870,002)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-66-PB

Jonathan Welch

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

August 21, 2007 trial in the above case to allow additional time

for the parties to conduct further plea negotiations. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 21, 2007 to October 10, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00066-PB Document 16 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 26, 2007

cc: Ray Raimo, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00066-PB Document 16 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2
#### Cleveland THOMAS, a Minor, by and Through his Next Friend, his Grandmother, Mamie Bush, Appellant, v. William KIRSCH, d/b/a Bill’s Auto Parts, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Jan. 21, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1747 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1747

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking a child 
                   hostage in order to evade arrest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

  Mrs. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking a child 
                   hostage in order to evade arrest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHILD HOSTAGE-TAKING TO EVADE ARREST OR OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1205. Child hostage-taking to evade arrest or obstruct justice
    ``(a) In General.--Whoever uses force or threatens to use force 
against any officer or agency of the Federal Government, and seizes or 
detains, or continues to detain, a child in order to--
            ``(1) obstruct, resist, or oppose any officer of the United 
        States, or other person duly authorized, in serving, or 
        attempting to serve or execute, any legal or judicial writ, 
        process, or warrant of any court of the United States; or
            ``(2) compel any department or agency of the Federal 
        Government to do or to abstain from doing any act;
or attempts to do so, shall be punished in accordance with subsection 
(b).
    ``(b) Sentencing.--Any person who violates subsection (a)--
            ``(1) shall be imprisoned not less than 10 years and not 
        more than 25 years;
            ``(2) if injury results to the child as a result of the 
        violation, shall be imprisoned not less than 20 years and not 
        more than 35 years; and
            ``(3) if death results to the child as a result of the 
        violation, shall be subject to the penalty of death or be 
        imprisoned for life.
    ``(c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term `child' 
means an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 55 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``1205. Child hostage-taking to evade arrest or obstruct justice.''.
                                 <all>
```