alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

PERRY W. BROWNING and NANCY L. )

BROWNING, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) Case no. 1:07-mc-00064-JD

v. ) Honorable Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ ASSENTED-TO 

MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME

The above-captioned proceeding is before the Court on the United States’ Assented-To

Motion for Additional Time to File Petition to Enforce, if Necessary. There is cause for the

relief requested, and the United States’ motion is GRANTED.

If necessary, the United States shall file a petition to enforce on or before June 12, 2008,

failing which the Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________________

JOSEPH A. DICLERICO, JR.

United States District Judge

cc: Peter D. Anderson, Esquire

James E. Brown, Esquire

John M. Colvin, Esquire

Case 1:08-cv-00043-JD Document 11-2 Filed 04/28/2008 Page 1 of 1

1:08-CV-43-JD xxxxxxxxxxxxx May 1, 2008 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Case 1:08-cv-00043-JD Document 12 Filed 05/01/08 Page 1 of 1
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, May 3-7, 200Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 937,627 40,551 69,665 76,163 101,444 145,96Number of loans 20,449 10,436 4,620 2,224 1,543 1,00Weighted average maturity (months)1 11.34 10.19 11.95 13.18 15.30 18.1

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 2.47 2.14 3.84 3.45 5.09 4.0

Weighted average risk rating3 3.33 3.20 3.23 3.25 3.16 3.4

Weighted average interest rate4 4.79 5.93 5.67 5.43 5.00 4.6

 Standard error5 .17 .24 .17 .19 .14 .1 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 5.20 7.07 6.59 6.45 5.75 5.3 25th percentile 4.04 5.02 4.59 4.33 4.07 3.6 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.43 5.79 5.37 5.14 4.95 5.1 Other livestock 4.77 6.23 5.39 5.93 5.23 4.7 Other current operating expenses7 4.95 6.01 5.79 5.39 4.99 4.6

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.98 6.11 5.63 5.61 4.88 4.8 Farm real estate 5.37 5.25 6.51 5.99 5.96 5.0 Other8 4.57 4.99 5.04 5.18 4.65 4.2

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 87.01 82.78 81.67 80.91 79.69 85.6 Under commitment 87.01 88.06 87.78 81.84 81.08 83.6 Callable 15.54 23.30 24.22 27.61 27.67 16.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.37 4.62 4.55 5.98 5.34 7.6 Other livestock 7.65 4.12 5.84 6.74 13.06 12.5 Other current operating expenses7 43.65 78.25 71.79 59.91 46.68 44.3

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.94 4.96 7.22 12.28 12.61 5.9 Farm real estate 2.97 .98 1.17 2.75 5.75 8.3 Other8 34.42 7.08 9.43 12.33 16.56 21.2

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 9.03 3.17 6.81 10.71 14.22 13.5 Other 87.22 88.62 87.31 80.97 79.99 82.4 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
#### Leo P. BOUDREAUX, on Behalf of and for the Use and Benefit of his Minor Son, Walton Boudreaux, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, Inc., Defendant and Appellee.

No. 14048.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 27, 1932.

W. J. & H. W. Waguespack, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Alvin R. Christovich and Ivy G. Kittredge, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

JANVIER, J.

The injury sustained in this case resulted from the accident which formed the basis of the suit we have decided to-day entitled Mr. and Mrs. Clifford J. Tabary v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 142 So. 809.

For the reasons given in that case, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-91-01-SM

Juan Evaristo Sanchez-Noboa

 a/k/a Luis Castro

O R D E R

Defendant Sanchez-Noboa’s motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial is granted (document 26). Trial has been rescheduled for

the April 2008 trial period. Defendant Sanchez-Noboa shall file a waiver of

speedy trial rights not later than March 7, 2008. On the filing of such waiver,

his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: March 18, 2008 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: April 1, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00091-SM Document 27 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 25, 2008

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00091-SM Document 27 Filed 02/25/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-mj-047-JM

Holland Smith

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. On two instances defendant tested positive for

cocaine use and thus he violated condition #1. He failed to

report as directed on seven instances, including one instance

where he was to be tested. See conditions # 6(a), 6(g) and 6(p). 

Given the number of failed opportunities to comply with

conditions I find that the defendant is unlikely to abide by any

condition or combination of conditions. The conditions of

release are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

Case 1:05-cr-00144-PB Document 11 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 2
2

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 9, 2005 

cc: Donald A. Feith, Esq.

 Bjorn Lange, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00144-PB Document 11 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
April 1, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RUFUS ANTONIO ESCOBEDO, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00221-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IB

Union Calendar No. 85

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1850

[Report No. 107–147]

To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility Needs

for Seniors in the 21st Century and to make technical corrections to

the law governing the Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2001

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself and Mr. FRANK) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

JULY 19, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and

Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century

and to make technical corrections to the law governing

the Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1850 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Housing Com3 mission Extension Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SENIORS HOUSING AND HEALTH FA5 CILITY NEEDS COMMISSION AND TECHNICAL

6 CORRECTIONS.

7 Section 525 of the Departments of Veterans Affairs

8 and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent

9 Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 (42 U.S.C. 12701

10 note) is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘reimburs12 able’’ and inserting ‘‘non-reimbursable’’;

13 (2) in the first sentence of subsection (f)—

14 (A) by striking ‘‘Banking and’’; and

15 (B) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2001’’ and

16 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2002’’; and

17 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘June 30,

18 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2003’’.

Union Calendar No. 85

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1850

[Report No. 107–147]

A BILL

To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing

and Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the21st Century and to make technical correctionsto the law governing the Commission.

JULY 19, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                       |                                          |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 26, 2005 | By:                                                              | /s/ Jean                Bernhard Buttner |
|                                 | Jean                Bernhard Buttner                                       |
|                                 | Chairman                & Chief Executive                Officer  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Manchester  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended April 30, 2004, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Elan Yaish, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to my
knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 18, 2004         /S/ Elan Yaish
                                -----------------------------------------

                            Elan Yaish
                            Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Laszlo N. Tauber & Associates I, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Alliance Capital Management L.P., Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 44]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered May 23, 2005, which denied and dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CFLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, and order, same court and Justice, entered July 5, 2005, which, upon the grant of reargument, adhered to the original determination, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

It is evident that the arbitration clause at issue was a narrow one, leaving the threshold determination of whether the condition precedent of timely notice of disagreement with the landlord’s statement was met by the tenant for judicial rather than arbitral resolution *(see Matter of Laszlo N. Tauber & Assoc. I v American Mgt. Assn.,*304 AD2d 413 [2003], citing *Silverstein Props. v Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis,*65 NY2d 785 [1985]).

*354The court properly found that respondent tenant’s request to audit petitioner landlords’ rent escalation statement did not constitute notice of disagreement, as required by the lease *(see id., citing Matter of Jack Kent Cooke, Inc. [Saatchi & Saatchi N. Am.],*222 AD2d 334 [1995]). However, respondent’s subsequent protest was sufficient, since petitioners’ failure to comply with the lease provision specifying the persons to whom notices were to be sent precluded them from invoking the lease provision requiring service of notices of disagreement within 120 days. Given the complex nature of the information contained in the notice, petitioners’ failure to serve respondent’s counsel, as required by the lease, was not merely technical or insubstantial, and thus the additional notice requirement was not waived by respondent’s lack of timely objection.

We have considered petitioners’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli and Malone, JJ. *[See*7 Misc 3d 1025(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50741(U).]
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 9, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Tracy Basinger, Director, 
Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. D.L. Evans Bancorp, Burley, Idaho; to engage de novo in a joint 
venture with New Country Mortgage, LLC, Pocatello, Idaho, in mortgage 
loan origination, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 19, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-22393 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         166,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,725,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,511
<INVENTORY>                                  8,210,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,238,704
<PP&E>                                       3,538,263
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,043,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,232,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,367,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,232,866
<SALES>                                     71,351,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,351,489
<CGS>                                       58,616,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,737,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,566,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,049,315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,517,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,517,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1737 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1737

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that witnesses at 
  Federal grand jury proceedings have the right to the assistance of 
                                counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2001

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that witnesses at 
  Federal grand jury proceedings have the right to the assistance of 
                                counsel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That chapter 215 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 3323. Right to assistance of counsel
    ``A witness before a grand jury shall have the right to have an 
attorney present in the room where the grand jury is sitting to assist 
that witness while the witness is being questioned.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end of the table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter the following new item:

``3323. Right to assistance of counsel.''.
                                 <all>
```