alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gilberto Brown

v. Civil No. 07-cv-174-SM

United States of America

O R D E R

Petitioner seeks relief from his conviction and sentence

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming, among other things, that his

defense counsel provided constitutionally deficient legal

representation.

Petitioner was convicted, after a jury trial, of two counts

of distribution of cocaine base (“crack”) in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 70 months of

imprisonment. The conviction and sentence were affirmed on

appeal. United States v. Brown, 450 F.3d 76 (1st Cir. 2006). 

This petition was timely filed within one year of the mandate.

Essentially three claims are made in the petition. 

Petitioner says defense counsel did not adequately investigate

his claims of actual innocence, or a mistaken identity defense,

and, counsel “refused to [call him] to the witness stand and

allow [him] to testify,” despite petitioner’s having insisted

upon exercising his right to testify. The last claim, at least,

Case 1:07-cv-00174-SM Document 5 Filed 02/08/08 Page 1 of 2
2

requires a hearing. See Owens v. United States, 483 F.3d 48, 60

(1st Cir. 2007).

The clerk will schedule a hearing on the petition.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

February 8, 2008

cc: Gilberto Brown, pro se

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Bjorn R. Lange, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00174-SM Document 5 Filed 02/08/08 Page 2 of 2
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2006...... 67.9 7.4 6.4 30.3 7.9 15.8 2.8 5.4 14.0 45.7 2003: Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Q4... 55.2 11.1 6.0 24.1 2.9 11.1 3.3 5.4 14.6 31.9 2004: Q1... 72.2 5.2 5.4 39.7 6.7 15.1 3.1 5.0 14.9 49.1  Q2... 60.2 3.8 4.7 30.2 3.9 17.6 4.0 6.5 13.0 36.7  Q3... 54.2 2.3 7.3 21.1 5.9 17.6 3.5 5.3 10.3 35.1  Q4... 71.0 12.6 9.2 28.6 7.4 13.2 2.6 4.8 14.7 48.9 2005: Q1... 55.2 5.3 5.3 34.4 2.5 7.7 2.4 4.2 13.7 34.8  Q2... 76.6 7.7 3.7 29.9 11.0 24.3 3.8 5.9 12.7 54.1  Q3... 59.1 3.4 6.1 24.4 10.1 15.2 3.2 4.7 12.6 38.7  Q4... 46.4 10.2 5.5 18.8 3.2 8.7 2.2 4.1 11.0 29.1 2006: Q1... 67.0 5.3 6.2 40.2 4.5 10.9 2.9 4.7 14.3 45.1  Q2... 80.2 5.0 6.2 34.8 16.6 17.7 3.3 6.7 15.4 54.7  Q3... 63.5 9.2 7.3 21.8 5.2 20.0 2.6 5.6 12.2 43.2  Q4... 60.8 10.0 6.1 24.5 5.4 14.8 2.3 4.7 14.1 39.7 2007: Q1... 69.6 5.9 5.3 40.0 3.5 14.9 2.3 4.8 13.4 49.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### Kenneth WAYNE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ricardo S. MARTINEZ, Defendant— Appellee.

No. 02-35707.

D.C. No. CV-02-00642-JCC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2002.*

Decided Jan. 21, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

The district court and this court lack jurisdiction to entertain this action because it is not being prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. *Fed.R.Civ.P.*17(a) (“[e]very action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest”); *C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States,*818 F.2d 696 (9th Cir.1987). The complaint does not name David Struckman as a plaintiff, even though he is identified throughout the pleadings as the real party in interest. Nor did Struckman sign the complaint or the notice of appeal. Kenneth Wayne, who appears pro se as the sole named plaintiff, cannot bring this action on Struckman’s behalf. *Id.*at 697 (“[although a non-attorney may appear *in propria persona*in his own behalf, that privilege is personal to him”). Wayne’s assertion that Rule 17(a) provides otherwise is without merit. *Id.*at 698. Because we lack jurisdiction, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         3,374
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,374
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,783,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,762,992
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,783,753
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6093]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Gilbert & George''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that an object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Gilbert & George'', imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit object at the Fine Arts Museums of San 
Francisco, de Young Museum, San Francisco, CA, from on or about 
February 16, 2008, until on or about May 18, 2008, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Richard Lahne, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
453-8058). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: February 1, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E8-2272 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1993...... 34.28 79.68 23.07 15.25 13.91 111.99 3.71 14.94 46.12 490.33 1994...... 33.91 60.27 27.58 16.29 17.54 123.60 3.72 14.57 46.98 480.70 1995...... 33.77 49.68 26.74 18.46 15.59 93.60 3.73 14.72 44.94 451.25 1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2001: Q4... 35.30 51.03 37.52 21.12 22.89 83.12 4.01 14.69 47.12 280.16 2002: Q1... 33.13 48.19 33.07 25.93 26.71 60.82 3.65 15.01 47.55 237.43  Q2... 23.72 41.55 32.41 18.55 19.26 48.30 3.69 15.06 45.28 216.61  Q3... 28.88 48.00 28.87 21.00 30.85 75.68 3.69 14.83 44.27 329.62  Q4... 31.46 52.06 38.39 22.16 17.78 67.64 3.85 15.19 46.02 333.67 2003: Q1... 35.98 68.86 32.35 27.73 38.74 62.19 3.72 14.88 46.71 249.54  Q2... 24.61 43.91 32.67 18.01 28.73 55.73 3.72 14.67 48.45 241.93  Q3... 27.75 78.05 40.90 17.84 37.37 65.70 3.53 14.83 46.45 319.67  Q4... 35.13 79.92 42.70 23.13 28.16 75.70 4.11 14.85 47.42 313.07 2004: Q1... 45.07 60.59 43.04 35.57 56.02 98.51 3.86 15.02 47.24 341.06  Q2... 32.01 47.74 36.25 21.95 26.77 116.76 3.73 15.17 45.83 358.08  Q3... 33.42 32.56 62.64 18.04 42.06 143.63 3.76 14.56 44.91 359.39  Q4... 49.42 108.90 70.44 30.21 75.92 90.23 3.96 14.46 46.63 385.43 2005: Q1... 40.23 52.36 44.37 36.66 35.31 54.11 3.57 14.72 49.15 290.01  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
*Release Date: September 30, 2007*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 7    | 0                                      | 1                                                     | 2 | 4 | .031 | .000 | .003 | .009 | .017 |
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| 20   | 2                                      | 6                                                     | 1 | 12 | .042 | .003 | .012 | .002 | .023 |
| n.a. | -3                                     | 0                                                     | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | -.006 | .000 | n.a. | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-144-01-SM

Richard Ellison

O R D E R

Defendant Ellison’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 30). Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2008 

trial period. Defendant Ellison shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than January 17, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: March 21, 2008 at 10:30 a.m.

Jury Selection: April 1, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00144-SM Document 31 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

January 3, 2008 

cc: Michael Smith, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00144-SM Document 31 Filed 01/03/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel Riley

v. Case No. 08-cv-00117-WES

United States,

Thomas Colantuono

Robert Kinsella

Arnold Huftalen

Stephen Monier

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: May 20, 2008

cc: Daniel Riley, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00117-WES Document 12 Filed 05/20/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-80-01/02-SM

Michael Monahan

Jeffrey Mealey

O R D E R

Defendant Mealey's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 31)

is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008 trial period. Defendants shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than February 15, 2008. On the filing of

such waivers, the continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 32 Filed 02/08/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances. NO FURTHER

CONTINUANCES ABSENT EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES.

Final Pretrial Conference: May 22, 2008 at 11:30 AM

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

February 8, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

 Mark Sisti, Esq.

 William Christie, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 32 Filed 02/08/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

RoseAnn Masello

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00136-JL

The Stanley Works, Inc, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

September 12, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 18) is approved as

submitted, with the following changes:

• Third-party action deadline: January 3, 2009

Based on the discussions between the court and

counsel/parties at the conference, the following are stricken

without prejudice to being re-instated on request if warranted by

the evidence:

• the following affirmative defenses: Affirmative

defense #5 asserted by both defendants (statute of

limitations)

Case 1:08-cv-00136-JL Document 20 Filed 09/15/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 15, 2008

cc: Daniel W. Buckley, Esq.

Francis X. Quinn, Jr., Esq.

Gerry D’Ambrosio, Esq.

Christopher A. Duggan, Esq.

Gerard A. Butler, Jr., Esq.

Arpier G. Saunders, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00136-JL Document 20 Filed 09/15/08 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 97




---



##### 



Exhibit 21.1 First Charter Corporation Affiliated Companies
As of March 10, 2004 Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Company, all of which are wholly
owned and are owned directly by the Company, unless otherwise indicated. Subsidiary
    
    State of IncorporationFirst Charter Bank
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Brokerage Services, Inc. (1)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Insurance Services, Inc. (1)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc. (2)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc. (3)
    
    VirginiaFirst Charter Realty Investments, Inc. (4)
    
    DelawareFirst Charter Real Estate Holdings, LLC (5)
    
    North CarolinaFCB Real Estate, Inc. (5)
    
    North CarolinaLincoln Center at Mallard Creek, LLC (6)
    
    North Carolina
   (1)
    
    Owned by First Charter Bank(2)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter Bank(3)
    
    Owned by First Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc.(4)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc.(5)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter Realty Investments, Inc.(6)
    
    51% owned by First Charter Bank 98
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55067-55068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1354-003]


Occidental Chemical Corporation; Notice of Filing

September 17, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 12, 2008, Occidental Chemical 
Corporation filed revised tariff sheet with correct category 
designations for each region, pursuant to the Commission's September 
11, 2008 order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 55068]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ebadaeb9a8a4858782858eb89e9b9b84999fab8d8e9988c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93d5d6c1d0dcfdfffafdf6c0e6e3e3fce1e7d3f5f6e1f0bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 3, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22271 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>