alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2008 Q2 survey,

region share of national

total 2.8 9.0 26.0 22.1 7.9 5.4 4.5 8.5 5.5 8.2

Sample coverage, 2008 Q2

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 7.5 4.6 17.7 33.2 22.4 11.3 9.6 6.3 8.0 31.2

Avg. loan size, 2008 Q2 survey

(thousands of dollars) 53.4 62.6 54.5 74.3 58.8 129.7 106.7 42.7 55.8 104.0

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

2003: Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2

2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8

Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1

Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9

Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2

2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0

Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7

Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8

Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5

2006: Q1 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.5 7.8

Q2 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.9 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 7.8

Q3 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.5 9.0

(0.58) (0.16) (0.12) (0.38) (0.30) (0.28) (0.29) (0.17) (0.21) (0.21)

Q4 9.2 8.6 7.4 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 8.9

(0.26) (0.24) (0.53) (0.38) (0.32) (0.63) (0.17) (0.18) (0.31) (0.14)

2007: Q1 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.9

(0.38) (0.27) (0.17) (0.41) (0.28) (0.41) (0.16) (0.28) (0.18) (0.07)

Q2 8.1 8.6 8.1 8.4 7.7 8.6 8.6 9.1 9.4 8.6

(0.16) (0.19) (0.41) (0.41) (0.31) (0.50) (0.11) (0.13) (0.12) (0.32)

Q3 10.4 8.6 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.9 8.9 9.5 8.6

(0.01) (0.42) (0.15) (0.35) (0.33) (0.44) (0.26) (0.17) (0.07) (0.30)

Q4 7.4 8.6 7.5 7.3 6.8 8.1 8.6 8.6 8.9 7.6

(0.01) (0.16) (0.25) (0.55) (0.47) (0.41) (0.17) (0.23) (0.15) (0.22)

2008: Q1 7.3 7.8 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.4 7.8 7.2 7.8 6.3

(0.14) (0.28) (0.14) (0.63) (0.66) (0.67) (0.72) (0.21) (0.23) (0.10)

Q2 7.4 6.6 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.7 6.9 6.4 6.3 5.1

(0.30) (0.09) (0.26) (0.89) (0.49) (0.29) (0.40) (0.30) (0.34) (0.25)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is

Delta States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

They are calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.

19
Order entered January 25, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01467 - CV DWAN MILLIGAN, Appellant

V. HP TEXAS I LLC C/O P ATHLIGHT PROPERTY MG T, Appellee

On App eal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 005 - 03165 - 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is Deputy District Clerk Sharon Howard’s January 22, 2019 re quest for extension of time to file the clerk’s record

. As the clerk’s re cord has been filed, we DENY the request as moot.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Concepcion GARZA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-40018.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Concepcion Garza-Gonzalez appeals his conviction following his guilty plea to importing 45.125 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1) and (b)(4), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Garza-Gonzalez argues that §§ 952 and 960 are facially unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000), *cert. denied,*532 U.S. 1045, 121 S.Ct. 2015, 149 L.Ed.2d 1015 (2001), but raises the issue only to preserve it for review in the Supreme Court.

*Slaughter*applies by analogy to the instant case because the statutes at issue are similar in structure and content. One panel of this court may not overrule another. *See United States v. Fowler,*216 F.3d 459, 461 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*531 U.S. 960, 121 S.Ct. 387, 148 L.Ed.2d 298 (2000).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: November 12, 2010 | /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge              |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Paul Van Ostenbridge                  |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |                                  |   |
|                     |                                  |   |
| Dated: November 12, 2010 | /s/ Claire M. Chadwick                |   |
|                     | Claire M. Chadwick                    |
|                     | Senior Vice President and             |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer               |

----
EXHIBIT B

Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 262-3 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 262-3 Filed 11/18/11 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 262-3 Filed 11/18/11 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph S. Haas,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 08-cv-169-SM

Stephen R. Monier, U.S. Marshal, and

Gary DiMartino, his Chief Deputy,

Defendants

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself from presiding over this case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

May 12, 2008

cc: Joseph S. Haas, pro se

Seth R. Aframe, Esq., AUSA

Case 1:08-cv-00169-MML Document 4 Filed 05/12/08 Page 1 of 1
Chart 1

Number, Size, and Volume of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2003

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

1

2

3

4

5

Number of non-real-estate farm loans Millions, annual rate

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

10

20

30

40

50

Average size of non-real-estate farm loans Thousands of dollars

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

25

50

75

100

125

Volume of non-real-estate farm loans

3

Billions of dollars, annual rate
Chart 2

Maturity and Interest Rate of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2003

 Note. Effective (compounded) annual interest rates are calculated from the stated rate and other

 terms of the loans and weighted by loan size.

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

4

8

12

16

Average maturity of non-real-estate farm loans 20

Months

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

4

8

12

16

Average effective interest rate on non-real-estate farm loans 20

Percent

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

0

25

50

75

100 Share of farm loans with a floating interest rate

4

Percent
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1886 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1886

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for appeals by third 
          parties in certain patent reexamination proceedings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPEALS IN INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS.

    (a) Appeals by Third-Party Requester in Proceedings.--Section 
315(b) of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Third-Party Requester.--A third-party requester--
            ``(1) may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and 
        may appeal under the provisions of sections 141 through 144, 
        with respect to any final decision favorable to the 
        patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim 
        of the patent; and
            ``(2) may, subject to subsection (c), be a party to any 
        appeal taken by the patent owner under the provisions of 
        section 134 or sections 141 through 144.''.
    (b) Appeal to Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.--Section 
134(c) of title 35, United States Code, is amended by striking the last 
sentence.
    (c) Appeal to Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.--Section 
141 of title 35, United States Code, is amended in the third sentence 
by inserting ``, or a third-party requester in an inter partes 
reexamination proceeding, who is'' after ``patent owner''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act apply with respect to any 
reexamination proceeding commenced on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
(logo)Wells Fargo

 

**CorporateTrust Services**

MACR1204-010

9062Old Annapolis Road

Columbia,MD 21045

 

Telephone:410 884 2000

Fax:410 715 2380

 

 

**AnnualStatement of Compliance**

 

 

Perthe applicable Servicing Agreement for the transaction listed on Schedule Ihereto, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,in its applicable capacity as listed on Schedule I ("Wells Fargo"),hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2019(the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)     Areview of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the applicable Servicing Agreement has been made under suchofficer’s supervision; and

 

(b)    To thebest of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as noted inSchedule I.

 

February12, 2020

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BrianSmith

VicePresident

 

/s/Patti Spencer

PattiSpencer

AssistantSecretary 

 

 

©2019 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. All rights reserved.

 

 

**ScheduleI**:

|  

Transaction                                                                      |  

Servicing  Agreement             |  

Servicing Agreement  Date |  

Wells Fargo  Capacity(ies) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|  

Benchmark  2019-B10 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates |  

Pooling and  Servicing Agreement |  

04/01/2019                |  

Certificate  Administrator |

 

 

**MaterialInstance(s) of Non-Compliance**

 

Listof exemptions for Benchmark 2019-B10 Mortgage Trust Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates:

 

Aportion of the November 18, 2019 distribution (the "NovemberDistribution"), due to holders of certificates of the Benchmark 2019-B10Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, was made onebusiness days late on November 19, 2019 by Wells Fargo. The CertificateAdministrator was required to make a distribution of $5,328,046.00 on theNovember Distribution but instead only paid $266,402.30. The delay in theremaining distribution, consisting of $5,061,643.70, was attributable to atechnical issue that caused a wire processing delay. The impact of this errorwas limited to the November Distribution. To prevent further similar paymenterrors, Wells Fargo has incorporated additional payment control procedures.
*Release Date: December 31, 2002*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 9.7     | 9.6                    | 9.1                                |
| 9.3     | 9.1                    | 8.5                                |
| 8.8     | 8.7                    | 8.1                                |
| 7.9     | 7.7                    | 7.2                                |
| 7.4     | 7.5                    | 7.0                                |
| 7.2     | 7.2                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 0.0     | 0.0                    | 0.0                                |
| 7.7     | 7.6                    | 7.1                                |
| 7.5     | 7.4                    | 6.9                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE PARTY TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WITH EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS* 
  

							
	 Name

	 	 Date of Agreement

	 	 Title

	 	 Initial Annual
 Base Salary


				
	 Robert V. Ahlgren
	 	January 1, 2004	 	Chief Operating Officer	 	$450,000
				
	 Michael K. Bresson
	 	December 7, 2001	 	Executive Vice President—Administration, General Counsel, and Secretary	 	$310,000
				
	 Dennis Brown
	 	April 1, 2003	 	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	 	$322,500
				
	 Gary J. Marmontello
	 	December 7, 2001	 	Vice President, Human Resources	 	$221,000
				
	 Peter Scheu
	 	December 7, 2001	 	Group President, Clinical Diagnostics	 	$275,000
				
	 Michael S. Smith
	 	June 18, 2003	 	Vice President of Strategic Initiatives	 	$250,000
				
	 Mark F. Stuppy
	 	December 7, 2001	 	Group President, Clinical Consumables	 	$246,000
				
	 Yuh-geng Tsay
	 	December 15, 2003	 	Group President, Immunodiagnostics	 	$320,000

  

	*	Mr. Jellinek, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is a party to a separate form of Employment Agreement that was filed as Exhibit 10.1(a) to the Company’s
Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 and is a party to a separate form of Employment Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Anthony LaFauci

v. Civil No. 08-cv-77-PB

Executive Assistant, New Hampshire

Adult Parole Board, et al.

O R D E R

Pro se petitioner Anthony LaFauci has filed a submission

entitled “Motion to the Courts Issued Order Dated April 17, 2008

to Clarified Filed Petition” and supporting documents (document

no. 9), which I liberally construe as a motion to amend his

petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 and a request to further stay the proceedings. Also filed

is a second submission and supporting documents (document no.

10), which I construe as a status report in connection with the

stay of LaFauci’s federal proceedings pending his exhaustion of

state remedies. 

LaFauci’s motion (document no. 9) is hereby granted. The

federal proceedings will remain stayed and the petition held in

abeyance pending his complete exhaustion of state remedies. Once

he has exhausted state remedies, he may request this Court to

Case 1:08-cv-00077-PB Document 11 Filed 10/29/08 Page 1 of 2
2

lift the stay and review his federal petition.

SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 29, 2008

cc: Anthony LaFauci, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00077-PB Document 11 Filed 10/29/08 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 105




---



##### 



First Charter Corporation
 
  Subsidiary
    
    State of IncorporationFirst Charter Bank
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Insurance Services, Inc. (1)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc. (2)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc. (3)
    
    VirginiaFirst Charter Realty Investments, Inc. (4)
    
    DelawareFirst Charter Real Estate Holdings, LLC (5)
    
    North CarolinaFCB Real Estate, Inc. (5)
    
    North CarolinaLincoln Center at Mallard Creek, LLC (6)
    
    North Carolina
 
 (1)
    
    Owned by First Charter Bank(2)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter Bank(3)
    
    Owned by First Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc.(4)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc.(5)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter Realty Investments, Inc.(6)
    
    51 percent owned by First Charter Bank 106
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1953

To revise the boundaries of Golden Gate National Recreation Area in the

State of California, to extend the term of the advisory commission for

the recreation area, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2001

Mr. LANTOS (for himself, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of

California, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. STARK, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. THOMPSON

of California, Ms. LEE, Mr. HONDA, and Ms. LOFGREN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To revise the boundaries of Golden Gate National Recreation

Area in the State of California, to extend the term of

the advisory commission for the recreation area, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rancho Corral de Tier5 ra Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Ad6 justment Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1953 IH

1 SEC. 2. GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, CALI2 FORNIA.

3 (a) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—Section 2(a) of Pub4 lic Law 92–589 (16 U.S.C. 460bb–1(a)) is amended—

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before the first sentence;

6 (2) by striking the fifth, sixth, and seventh sen7 tences and inserting the following:

8 ‘‘(2) The recreation area shall also consist of the fol9 lowing:

10 ‘‘(A) Lands within Marin County Assessor’s

11 parcel numbered 119–040–04, 119–040–05, 119–

12 040–18, 166–202–03, 166–010–06, 166–010–07,

13 166–010–24, 166–010–25, 119–240–19, 166–010–

14 10, 166–010–22, 119–240–03, 119–240–51, 119–

15 240–52, 119–240–54, 166–010–12, 166–010–13,

16 and 119–235–10.

17 ‘‘(B) Lands and waters in San Mateo County

18 generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Sweeney

19 Ridge Addition, Golden Gate National Recreation

20 Area’, numbered NRA GG–80,000–A, and dated

21 May 1980.

22 ‘‘(C) Lands acquired pursuant to the Golden

23 Gate National Recreation Area Addition Act of 1992

24 (Public Law 102–299; 106 Stat. 236).

25 ‘‘(D) Lands generally depicted on the map enti26 tled ‘Additions to Golden Gate National Recreation
3

•HR 1953 IH

1 Area’, numbered NPS–80–076, and dated July

2 2000/PWR–PLRPC.

3 ‘‘(E) Lands generally depicted on the map enti4 tled ‘Rancho Corral de Tierra Additions to the Gold5 en Gate National Recreation Area’, numbered NPS–

6 80,079, and dated May 2001.’’.

7 (b) EXTENSION OF TERM OF ADVISORY COMMIS8 SION.—Section 5(g) of Public Law 92–589 (16 U.S.C.

9 460bb–4(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘thirty years after the

10 enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on December 31,

11 2022’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-132-PB

Scott M. Annis

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 3, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete a residential treatment program and

negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 3, 2008 to October 7, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 17 Filed 05/19/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 21, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

September 24, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 19, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 17 Filed 05/19/08 Page 2 of 2