1Glenn has named the following defendants to this action:

the Hillsborough County Department of Corrections (“HCDC”), HCDC

Superintendent James O’Mara, HCDC Capt. David Dionne, HCDC Capt.

Dempsey, first name unknown (“FNU”), HCDC Capt. FNU Cusson, HCDC

Sgt. Todd Gordon, HCDC Lt. FNU Cunningham, HCDC Director of

Security Bonnie Ives, HCDC Classification Officer William

Raymond, HCDC Nurse Denise Hartley, HCDC Dr. FNU Harris, HCDC Dr.

FNU Ward, HCDC Lt. FNU Gidarokas, HCDC Lt. FNU Scurry, HCDC Lt.

FNU Martano, HCDC Health Services Administrator Barbara Condant,

HCDC Lt. FNU Robinson, HCDC Lt. FNU Hico, HCDC Officer FNU

Archambault, HCDC Officer Roger Copp, New Hampshire State Prison

(“NHSP”) Warden Bruce Cattell, NHSP employee Joel Dinsmore, NHSP

Sgt. FNU Smith, NHSP Sgt. FNU Morrin, NHSP Lt. FNU Moquin, New

Hampshire Attorney General Kelly Ayotte, Assistant New Hampshire

Attorney General Karen Huntress, Assistant New Hampshire Attorney

General Charles O’Keefe, and Assistant New Hampshire Attorney

General Mark Brown. Glenn has named all of the individual

defendants to this action in both their individual and official

capacities.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Charles Glenn

v. Civil No. 06-cv-99-PB

Hillsborough County Department

of Corrections, et al.1

O R D E R

Before the Court is Charles Glenn’s pro se and in forma

pauperis complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Glenn

alleges that while he was incarcerated at the Hillsborough County

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 9 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 4
2These claims are numbered 12-15 in the Report and

Recommendation issued this date.

2

Department of Corrections (“HCDC”) and the New Hampshire State

Prison (“NHSP”), he was subjected to conditions of confinement

that violated his federal constitutional rights. The matter is

before this Court for preliminary review to determine, among

other things, whether the complaint states any claim upon which

relief might be granted. See United States District Court for

the District of New Hampshire Local Rule (“LR”) 4.3(d)(2). 

As explained fully in a Report and Recommendation issued

simultaneously with this Order, and without commenting on the

merits of the complaint, I find that Glenn has alleged four

claims upon which relief might be granted: (1) that Glenn was

subjected to unconstitutionally punitive conditions of

confinement as a pretrial detainee, (2) that he was denied

adequate food, (3) that he was denied adequate care for his

serious mental health needs, and (4) that he was denied his right

to speak and to petition the government for a redress of

grievances.2 I direct that these claims be served against

defendants Cusson, Archambault, Dempsey, Ives, Dionne, Gordon,

Copp, Scurry, Ward, Harris, Condont, Hartley and O’Mara.

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 9 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 4
3The complaint, motion to amend complaint and amended

complaint will be considered, in the aggregate, to be the

complaint in this matter for all purposes.

3

My review of the file indicates that Glenn has filed two

summons forms, each listing multiple defendants to this action. 

However, plaintiff must prepare a separate summons form for each

defendant to be served, and no such individual forms have been

prepared and submitted by Glenn. Therefore, Glenn shall prepare

summonses for each defendant named herein and submit them to the

Clerk’s office within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 

Upon receipt of the completed summonses, the Clerk’s office shall

issue the summonses against defendants and forward to the United

States Marshal for the District of New Hampshire (the “U.S.

Marshal’s office”) the summonses and copies of the complaint, as

well as Glenn’s other substantive pleadings (document nos. 1, 5 &

6)3, the Report and Recommendation issued simultaneously with

this Order, and this Order. Upon receipt of the necessary

documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s office shall effect service

upon Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). 

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 9 Filed 10/03/06 Page 3 of 4
4

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

the Defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 3, 2006

cc: Charles Glenn, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 9 Filed 10/03/06 Page 4 of 4