alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJWINDER SINGH, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70064 

Agency No. A099-857-409 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Rajwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the 

denial of a motion to reconsider or reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-70064 

791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reconsider 

where Singh failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior order. See 

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (a motion to reconsider must specify errors of fact or law 

in a prior decision); Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir. 2004) (discussing 

the standard for a motion to reconsider).

In construing Singh’s motion as a motion to reopen, the BIA did not abuse 

its discretion in denying it where Singh failed to demonstrate that the new evidence 

he submitted would likely have changed the outcome of his case. See Shin v. 

Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Aliens who seek to remand or 

reopen proceedings to pursue relief bear a ‘heavy burden’ of proving that, if 

proceedings were reopened, the new evidence would likely change the result in the 

case.” (citation omitted)).

We reject Singh’s contention that the BIA failed to construe his motion to 

reconsider as a motion to reopen. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-170897) and Amendment No. 710 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial
    statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
    individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  September 6, 2019
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1994...... 100.0 85.5 12.3 1.9 .2 .1 .0

1995...... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .5 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997: Q1... 100.0 79.1 16.7 3.7 .4 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.5 15.8 3.2 .3 ... .1

 Q3... 100.0 81.8 15.2 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998: Q1... 100.0 80.6 16.3 2.8 .1 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


<PAGE>   2


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

First Charter Corporation

                              Affiliated Companies
                              As of March 23, 2001


Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Company, all of which are wholly owned
and are owned directly by the Company, unless otherwise indicated.




                  First Charter National Bank
                  First Charter Brokerage Services (1)
                  First Charter Insurance Services (1)
                  First Charter Realty Investment, Inc. (1)
                  FCNB Real Estate, Inc. (2)
                  CFBI Mortgage, Inc. (3)
                  CFBI Corp, Inc. (1)
                  -------------------

(1)      Owned by First Charter National Bank
(2)      Owned by First Charter Realty Investment, Inc.
(3)      Owned by CFBI Corp, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Robert H. Daskal,  Acting Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




                                           /s/ Robert H. Daskal
                                           --------------------
                                           Robert H. Daskal
                                           Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                           August 13, 2004
*Release Date: September 30, 2008*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 8.7     | 8.7                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.9     | 8.8                    | 8.3                                |
| 9.0     | 8.8                    | 8.3                                |
| 8.9     | 8.8                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.8     | 8.7                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.7     | 8.6                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.2     | 8.1                    | 7.6                                |
| 6.9     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 6.6     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
||
| 9.0     | 8.8                    | 8.2                                |
| 9.1     | 8.9                    | 8.4                                |
| 9.2     | 8.9                    | 8.3                                |
| 9.1     | 8.8                    | 8.3                                |
| 9.1     | 8.8                    | 8.2                                |
| 9.0     | 8.7                    | 8.1                                |
| 8.5     | 8.2                    | 7.7                                |
| 7.4     | 7.2                    | 6.7                                |
| 7.1     | 6.9                    | 6.6                                |
||
| 9.1     | 9.1                    | 8.7                                |
| 9.3     | 9.3                    | 8.8                                |
| 9.4     | 9.4                    | 8.8                                |
| 9.2     | 9.3                    | 8.6                                |
| 9.4     | 9.5                    | 9.3                                |
| 9.1     | 8.9                    | 8.8                                |
| 8.3     | 8.4                    | 8.4                                |
| 7.5     | 7.6                    | 7.7                                |
| 6.6     | 6.8                    | 6.8                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
#### Alice E. DOBSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS OF THE ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellee.*

No. 12084.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

*Oct.*17, 1932.

St. John Perret, John R. Perez, Henry G. McMahon, and John H. Holmes, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

James Wilkinson, N. H. Polmer, and George Piazza, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

•PER CURIAM,

For the reasons assigned in the case of John Williams et al. v. Board of Levee Commissioners of Orleans Levee District (La. App.) 141 So. 871, decided May 30th, 1932, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment herein appealed from be, and it is, affirmed. Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Andrew Frost

v. Case No. 08-cv-193-PB

United States of America 

ORDER

Re: Document No. 1, 2255 Motion

Ruling: 

This petition rehashes arguments that the court considered and

rejected when it denied petitioner's section 2255 petition. As

the government correctly notes, neither audita querela nor any

provision of the All Writs Act entitles petitioner to review by

this court of what is in effect a second section 2255 petition.

For these reasons, the petition is dismissed.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

U.S. District Judge

Date: June 30, 2008

cc: Andrew Frost, Pro Se

Aixa Maldonado, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00193-PB Document 4 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1546 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1546

 To allow States to spend certain funds to establish and maintain peer 
                          mediation programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2001

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow States to spend certain funds to establish and maintain peer 
                          mediation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOVERNOR'S PROGRAMS.

    Section 4114(c) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7114) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (11);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (12) as (13); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (11) the following:
            ``(12) establishing and maintaining peer mediation programs 
        that include educating and training peer mediators and a 
        designated faculty supervisor and purchasing necessary 
        materials to facilitate training and the mediation process; 
        and''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gilbert Maurice Goudreau

v. Case No. 06-cv-373-SM

Elizabeth Ann Cyr

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 16, 2007, no objection having been filed, for the reasons set

forth therein. 

Plaintiff's "Motion to Continue Complaint With New Evidence" has been

considered by the court, but it adds nothing that would respond adequately to the

jurisdictional defects identified by the Magistrate Judge. It would seem that what

relief plaintiff may be entitled to should be pursued in state, not federal, court.

Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby dismissed. 

SO ORDERED.

June 7, 2007 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Gilbert Maurice Goudreau, pro se 

Case 1:06-cv-00373-SM Document 8 Filed 06/07/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00373-SM Document 8 Filed 06/07/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-108-01-SM

William R. Slack

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 9) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than June 27, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:07-cr-00108-SM Document 10 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: September 28, 2007 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: October 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

June 26, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

 Bjorn Lange, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00108-SM Document 10 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2007...... 1.34 .09 .11 .90 .12 .13 .51 .38 .32 .14 2004: Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Q2... 1.56 .08 .12 1.09 .13 .14 .63 .45 .35 .13  Q3... 1.25 .08 .08 .84 .12 .13 .49 .36 .28 .11  Q4... 1.37 .11 .15 .86 .10 .14 .50 .38 .34 .15  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LARSCOM INCORPORATED FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,376
<SECURITIES>                                    14,844
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                       260
<INVENTORY>                                     15,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,181
<PP&E>                                          19,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,373
<SALES>                                         22,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,330
<CGS>                                           10,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11

Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Unit

For the Periods



|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | --------- | - | ------------------------------------ | - | --------- | -
|                                             |  | January 1, 2010throughMarch 31, 2010 |           |   | January 1, 2009throughMarch 31, 2009 |  
|                                             |  | (unaudited)                          |           |   | (unaudited)                          |  
|Net income (Loss)                            |  | $                                    | (4,389    | ) |                                      | $ | (18,763   | )
|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |  
|Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |  |                                      | 4,222,870 |   |                                      |   | 4,222,870 |  
|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                     |  | $                                    | (0.00     | ) |                                      | $ | (0.00     | )
|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |