alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3
FISCAL 2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 


For the 12 month period ending June 30, 2020, each non-employee director of Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. will receive the following compensation:
 
	
				
	 ●
	 
	 
	Retainers of $45,000 for service as a Board member; $22,000 for service as the chair of the Audit committee; $20,000 for service as a chair of a Board committee other than the Audit committee; $10,000 for service as a member of a Board committee; and $1,200 per Board or committee meeting attended in the event that more than 12 of such meetings are held during the period. Directors may irrevocably elect, in advance of the fiscal year, to receive these fees in cash, in common stock of the Company or a combination thereof, or in restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Each director electing to receive fees in RSUs shall at the time of such election also irrevocably select the date of settlement of the RSU. On the settlement date, RSUs may be settled, at the Company’s discretion, in cash or in shares of common stock or a combination thereof.




 
	
				
	 ●
	 
	 
	An RSU award with a value of $145,000 payable, in the Company’s discretion, in cash or in shares of common stock. The Company will provide for the RSU payment, whether paid in cash or shares of common stock, to be made (in a lump sum if paid in cash) within 30 days following the six-month anniversary of the termination of the director’s Board membership.






In addition, the Lead Independent Director of the Board receives an additional annual retainer of $40,000, and may irrevocably elect, in advance of the fiscal year, to receive this retainer in cash, in common stock of the Company or a combination thereof, or in RSUs. The non-employee members of the Board are also reimbursed for travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board or committee meetings.
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1992...... .6 .2 .4 .1 .3 3.2 1.2 2.0 .6 1.4

1993...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.5 .5 1.1

1994...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

1994: Q3... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.1 .7 1.3 .5 .8

 Q4... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995: Q1... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 3.1 1.3 1.8 .7 1.0

 Q2... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.6 .7 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.6 .6 .9

 Q4... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.7 1.6 2.1 1.0 1.2

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 3.0 1.1 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Darryl E. Bickham 

v. Civil No. 07-cv-64-JL 

NH State Prison, Warden 

O R D E R 

The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The petitioner has not shown 

that reasonable jurists could debate whether the petition should have been resolved in a different 

manner, that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, or 

otherwise made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 

2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000). 

SO ORDERED. 

December 21, 2009 

Joseph N. Laplante 

United States District Judge 

(/*€ J^Y/O^^~ 

cc: Darryl E. Bickham, pro se 

Elizabeth Woodcock, Esq. 

Stephen Fuller, Esq. 

Case 1:07-cv-00064-JL Document 28 Filed 12/21/09 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1503

To prohibit the Department of the Interior from expending any funds for

a mid-Atlantic coast offshore oil and gas lease sale.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To prohibit the Department of the Interior from expending

any funds for a mid-Atlantic coast offshore oil and gas

lease sale.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR

4 MID-ATLANTIC OIL AND GAS LEASE SALE.

5 The Secretary of the Interior shall not expend any

6 funds for the preparation of, or conduct of, preleasing and

7 leasing activities (including calls for information, tract se8 lection, notices of sale, receipt of bids, and award of

9 leases) with respect to an oil and gas lease sale on any

10 lands of the outer Continental Shelf between the seaward
2

•HR 1503 IH

1 boundary between the States of Connecticut and Rhode

2 Island and the seaward boundary between the States of

3 North Carolina and South Carolina.

Æ
Exhibit 10.10


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO

LOAN AGREEMENT


 


This SECOND AMENDMENT
TO LOAN AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of September 11, 2019, by and between Apollo
Medical Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Lender”), and AP-AMH Medical Corporation, a California professional
medical corporation (“Borrower”).


 


A.       Lender
and Borrower have previously entered into that certain Loan Agreement dated as of May 10, 2019, as amended by that certain First
Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of August 26, 2019 (together, the “Loan Agreement”). 


 


B.       Lender
and Borrower desire to further amend the Loan Agreement as set forth herein. 


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements, representations, warranties, provisions and covenants herein contained,
the parties hereto, each intending to be bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.       Definitions.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Loan Agreement.


 


2.       Definition
of Excluded Assets. Exhibit B to the Loan Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating the definition of “Excluded
Assets” in Section 1 thereof to read in full as follows:


 


“Excluded
Assets” means (i) assets received from the sale of shares of the Series A Preferred equal to the Series A Purchase Price,
(ii) the assets of the Company that are not Healthcare Services Assets, including the Company’s equity interests in
Universal Care, Inc., Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., and any entity that is primarily engaged in the business of owning, leasing,
developing or otherwise operating real estate, (iii) any assets acquired with the proceeds of the sale, assignment or other
disposition of any of the assets described in clauses (i) or (ii), and (iv) any proceeds of the assets described in clauses
(i), (ii) and (iii).


 


3.       Effect
of Amendment. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms of the Loan Agreement shall remain unchanged
and in full force and effect. The provisions of Sections 6 through 15 of the Loan Agreement are incorporated in this Amendment
by this reference, mutatis mutandis.


 


 


 


[Signatures appear on the following page.]


 




    1


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been executed as of the date first above written.


 


	Borrower:	 	Lender:	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AP-AMH MEDICAL CORPORATION	 	APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Thomas Lam	 	By:	/s/ Eric Chin	 
	 	Thomas S. Lam, M.D., 	 	 	Eric Chin,	 
	 	Chief Executive Officer  	 	 	Chief Financial Officer	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Address:	 	 	 	 
	1668 S. Garfield Ave., 2nd Floor	 	By:	/s/ Mitchell Kitayama	 
	Alhambra, CA 91801	 	 	Mitchell Kitayama,	 
	 	 	 	 	Independent Committee Director	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Address:	 
	 	 	 	1668 S. Garfield Avenue, 2nd Floor	 
	 	 	 	Alhambra, CA 91801	 




 






    S-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
          the Covance consolidated financial statements for the six months ended
          June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
          financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001023131
<NAME>                        Covance Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                   US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                11,231,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                        177,609,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                           21,379,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     251,898,000
<PP&E>                               376,186,000
<DEPRECIATION>                       175,983,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       509,295,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                162,740,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 580,000
<OTHER-SE>                           184,711,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         509,295,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     350,598,000
<CGS>                                232,066,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        305,982,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         187,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     3,503,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       40,926,000
<INCOME-TAX>                          17,248,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   23,320,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                          23,320,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.40
                                            


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1754 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1754

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that ancestors 
 and lineal descendants of past or present members of the Armed Forces 
    shall be taken into account in determining whether a veterans' 
                    organization is exempt from tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

 Mr. Houghton (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Ehrlich, Mr. 
    Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Oxley, and Mr. McHugh) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that ancestors 
 and lineal descendants of past or present members of the Armed Forces 
    shall be taken into account in determining whether a veterans' 
                    organization is exempt from tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENT FOR EXEMPTION FROM 
              TAX FOR VETERANS' ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 501(c)(19) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to list of exempt 
organizations) is amended by striking ``or widowers'' and inserting ``, 
widowers, or ancestors or lineal descendants''.
    (b) Modification Not To Apply in Determining Unrelated Business 
Taxable Income.--Paragraph (4) of section 512(a) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``members of such organization or their 
dependents'' and inserting ``members of such organization who are past 
or present members of the Armed Forces of the United States or who are 
dependents of such past or present members''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES –OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Michael E. Jalbert, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report.

 

 
| ** ** | **/S/ Michael E. Jalbert**     |
|------------|--------------------------------|
|       | Michael E. Jalbert             |
|       | Chief Executive Officer        |
|       | (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

**November 12,2009**

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3013

_____________________________

DAISY RICHARDS, as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of 

James E. Hurd, Jr., Deceased,

Appellant,

v.

JAMES E. RISH,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gulf County.

John L. Fishel, II, Judge.

May 31, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a Final Judgment entered in Appellee’s 

favor on several claims, including unjust enrichment, arising from 

an unenforceable oral contract for the sale of real property. We 

agree with Appellant that the trial court’s determination that 

equity did not compel repayment of funds paid to Appellee is 

unsupported by the evidence. See Golden v. Woodward, 15 So. 3d 

664, 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that an unjust enrichment 

action exists to prevent “‘the wrongful retention of a benefit, or the 

retention of money or property of another, in violation of good 

conscience and fundamental principles of justice or equity’” 

(citation omitted)); see also Cole Taylor Bank v. Shannon, 772 So. 
2

2d 546, 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (applying the competent, 

substantial evidence standard of review in reviewing a trial court’s 

ruling in favor of a defendant in an unjust enrichment action). We, 

therefore, reverse the Final Judgment on the issue of unjust 

enrichment and remand with directions that the trial court enter 

judgment in Appellant’s favor on that claim. 

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

George V. Matlock, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James E. Rish, pro se, Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54945-54946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9422]
RIN 1545-BE95


S Corporation Guidance Under AJCA of 2004 and GOZA of 2005; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 
9422) that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, August 
14, 2008 (73 FR 47526) providing guidance

[[Page 54946]]

regarding certain changes made to the rules governing S corporations 
under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and the Gulf Opportunity 
Zone Act of 2005. The final regulations replace obsolete references in 
the current regulations and allow taxpayers to make proper use of the 
provisions that made changes to prior law. The final regulations 
include guidance on the S corporation family shareholder rules, the 
definitions of ``powers of appointment'' and ``potential current 
beneficiaries'' (PCBs) with regard to electing small business trusts 
(ESBTs), the allowance of suspended losses to the spouse or former 
spouse of an S corporation shareholder, and relief for inadvertently 
terminated or invalid qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) 
elections. The final regulations affect S corporations and their 
shareholders.

DATES: The correction is effective September 24, 2008, and is 
applicable on August 14, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles J. Langley, Jr., (202) 622-
3060, (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9422) that are the subject of this 
correction are under sections 1361, 1362, and 1366 of the Internal 
Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations (TD 9422) contain an error that 
may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9422), 
which was the subject of FR Doc. E8-18782, is corrected as follows:
    On page 47527, column 3, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``Drafting Information'', line 2, the language ``proposed 
regulations is Charles J.'' is corrected to read ``regulations is 
Charles J.''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E8-22381 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited interim consolidated  financial  statements of Prime Succession,  Inc.
and subsidiaries,  for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                    0001023294                         
<NAME>                   Prime Succession, Inc.     
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,932
<INVENTORY>                                     50,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,709
<PP&E>                                          73,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,092
<BONDS>                                        214,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,816
<SALES>                                         51,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,698
<CGS>                                           33,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   917
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>