alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Lafarge North America Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Philippe R. Rollier, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 1, 2005
    
    /s/ PHILIPPE R. ROLLIERPhilippe R. RollierPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                   15,503,670
<SECURITIES>                              7,155,261
<RECEIVABLES>                             5,304,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                               7,305,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         37,272,226
<PP&E>                                    2,306,778
<DEPRECIATION>                            1,143,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           40,298,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     7,056,332
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     95,228
<OTHER-SE>                               33,146,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             40,298,040
<SALES>                                   9,399,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          9,399,312
<CGS>                                     3,856,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             7,641,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,149,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                642,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,506,902
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,506,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .15
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00346-CV

MATTHEW S. BOVEE,

Appellant

v.

HOUSTON PRESS LLP, MARGARET 

DOWNING, DIANNA WRAY, PETER 

RYAN, DALLAS OBSERVER, LLP, KXAN, 

DAWN DENNY, PATRICK WILLIAMS, 

MEDIA GENERAL INC., VOICE MEDIA 

GROUP, DOES 1 THROUGH 5, AND 

MICHELLE HEINZ,

Appellees

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-C201500272

O R D E R

Appellant’s affidavit of indigence was filed on November 9, 2015. 

The requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 
Bovee v. Houston Press LLP Page 2

apply when indigent inmates file a civil appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 

14.002 (West 2002); Anderson v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Justice, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2015 Tex. App. 

LEXIS 2674 (Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 19, 2015, no pet.). Chapter 14 requires appellant, as 

an inmate, to file an affidavit or declaration "relating to previous filings" in which 

appellant must detail all previous civil actions filed pro se, other than a suit under the 

Family Code. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004(a) (West 2002); Anderson v. 

Tex. Dep't of Crim. Justice, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 2674 at *5. Appellant has not filed an 

affidavit or declaration relating to his previous filings in this appeal. 

Accordingly, appellant is ordered to file an affidavit or declaration relating to his 

previous filings required by Chapter 14 within 14 days from the date of this Order. 

Failure to timely file this additional document will result in the dismissal of this appeal 

without further notice and a finding that the appeal is frivolous. Anderson, 2015 Tex. 

App. LEXIS 2674 at *5. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Documents ordered filed

Order issued and filed November 19, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1448 Reference Change House (RCH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1448

 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on 
the Judiciary and Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                           September 6, 2001

               The Committee on Ways and Means discharged

                           September 6, 2001

   Rereferred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS AND OTHER 
              OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) Authority To Issue Certain Private Activity Bonds.--The 
Government of American Samoa may cause to be issued qualified bonds 
(within the meaning of section 141(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).
    (b) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and Local 
Governments.--
            (1) In general.--The interest on any bond or other 
        obligation issued by or on behalf of the Government of American 
        Samoa shall be exempt from taxation by the Government of 
        American Samoa and the governments of any of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, any territory or possession 
        of the United States, and any subdivision thereof.
            (2) Exemption applicable only to income taxes.--The 
        exemption provided by paragraph (1) shall not apply to gift, 
        estate, inheritance, legacy, succession, or other wealth 
        transfer taxes.
    (c) Conforming Repeal of Superseded Provision.--Section 202 of 
Public Law 98-454 (48 U.S.C. 1670) is repealed.
    (d) Effective Date.--This Act shall apply to obligations issued 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

LINDA RUMBAUGH,

Petitioner

v.

THOMAS J. KOZESKY, JR.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 204 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1860 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1860

To reauthorize the Small Business Technology Transfer Program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2001

Mr. Ehlers (for himself, and Mr. Barcia) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Small Business, and in addition 
to the Committee on Science, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Small Business Technology Transfer Program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLICITATIONS.

    Section 9(o)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(o)(2)) is 
amended by inserting ``, which may be conjoined with SBIR 
solicitations,'' after ``STTR solicitations''.

SEC. 2. DATABASE.

    (a) Collection.--
            (1) Amendment.--Section 9(o)(9) of the Small Business Act 
        (15 U.S.C. 638(o)(9)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(9) collect, and maintain in a common format in 
        accordance with subsection (v), such information from awardees 
        as is necessary to assess the STTR program, including 
        information necessary to maintain the database described in 
        subsection (k);''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 9(v) of the Small 
        Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(v)) is amended by inserting ``or 
        STTR'' after ``SBIR'' both places it appears.
    (b) Database.--Section 9(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
638(k)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or STTR'' after ``SBIR'' each place it 
        appears in paragraph (1);
            (2) by inserting ``or required to have an STTR program 
        pursuant to subsection (n),'' after ``subsection (f)(1),'' in 
        paragraph (2);
            (3) by inserting ``and STTR'' after ``solely for SBIR'' in 
        paragraph (2); and
            (4) by inserting ``or STTR'' after ``SBIR'' in paragraph 
        (2)(A)(iii) and (D).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 9(n)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(n)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``and 2001'' and inserting ``2001, 2002, 2003, 
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2

AUTO-BY-TEL CORPORATION

1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN



---

2007 Amendment



---

WHEREAS,Autobytel Inc.
(the Corporation maintains the Auto-By-Tel Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan), and the Board of Directors has duly approved a resolution to amend 



| | (i) | Section 13(a) of the Plan to increase by 350,000 the number of shares of the Corporations common stock (Common Stock) that participants in the Plan may
purchase; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | Section 23 to provide that the right of Plan participants to purchase these 350,000 shares shall expire ten years after the date hereof (or, if earlier, the date of the
Plans termination or the date required to conform the Plan with the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code).
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the Plan be and it is hereby amended as follows, effective immediately but subject to approval of this amendment by the Corporations stockholders within 12 months of
the date hereof.



| | 1. | Section 13(a) of the Plan is amended by replacing 700,000 with 1,050,000.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Section 23 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With respect to the 350,000 shares of Common Stock that the Plan reserves for purchase pursuant to the 2007 Amendment of the Plan, the term of the
Plan shall expire ten years after the earlier of Board or shareholder approval of said 2007 Amendment (unless sooner terminated under Section 20 hereof).



| | 3. | Each and every other provision of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect, subject only to the change set forth above.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WHEREFORE, the undersigned, being a duly authorized officer of the Corporation, hereby adopts and approves this 2007 Amendment to the Plan,
effective April 18, 2007.



AUTOBYTEL INC.By

/s/ Ariel AmirA duly authorized Officer
**
**Exhibit 8.1**

**Significant Subsidiaries and VIE of the Registrant**

 

**Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant**
  
**Place of Incorporation**
QK365.com INC.  British Virgin IslandsQINGKE (CHINA) LIMITED  Hong KongShanghai Qingke Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.  China
**VIE**
  
**Place of Incorporation**
Shanghai Qingke E-Commerce Co., Ltd.  China
**Significant Subsidiaries of the VIE**
  
**Place of Incorporation**
Shanghai Qingke Equipment Rental Co., Ltd.  ChinaShanghai Qingke Trade Co., Ltd.  ChinaShanghai Qingke Creative Industry Supporting Property Management Co., Ltd.  ChinaShanghai Min Qing Property Management Co., Ltd.  ChinaShanghai Qing Teng Investment Management Center (Limited Partnership)  ChinaSuzhou Qingke Information Technology Co., Ltd.  ChinaShanghai Qingke Public Rental Housing Leasing Management Co., Ltd.  China**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard Adam

v. Civil No. 07-cv-338-JL

Thomas Arthur Hensley

O R D E R

This matter came before me for preliminary review, pursuant

to United States District Court District of New Hampshire Local

Rule 4.3(d)(1)(A), to determine whether or not the complaint

invokes the subject matter jurisdiction of this Court. After

reviewing the complaint, I find that plaintiff has properly

invoked the diversity jurisdiction of this Court, as the parties

to plaintiff’s state court claim are citizens of different

states, and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28

U.S.C. § 1332. Accordingly, the matter may proceed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 31, 2008

cc: Richard Adam, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00338-JL Document 4 Filed 01/31/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:07-cv-00338-JL Document 4 Filed 01/31/08 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens Holding Co. for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert J. DiNicola, as ChiefExecutive Officer of Linens Holding Co., and Francis M. Rowan, as ChiefFinancial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of his knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Linens HoldingCo.
| /s/ Robert J. DiNicola |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
| **Name:**              | Robert J. DiNicola        |
| **Title:**             | Chairman and Chief        |
|                   | Executive Officer         |
| **Date:**              | May 15, 2007              |
| ** **             |                      |
| ** **             |                      |
| /s/ Francis M.  Rowan  |                      |
| **Name:**              | Francis M. Rowan          |
| **Title:**             | Senior Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer   |
| **Date:**              | May 15, 2007              |
|                        |                           |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001023745
<NAME>                        VOICENET, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,051,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,051,136
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,614,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,620
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,340,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,614,820
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  550,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (482,362)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (482,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (482,362)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10387 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. KALI LORD , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:17

- CR

- 57

- 1

Before BENAVIDES, HIGGINSON, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kali Lord appeals the 57

- month, within

- guidelines sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. She argues that the district court failed to adequately explain the reason for the sentence in light of t he nonfrivolous arguments she presented in favor of a lower sentence.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10387 Document: 00514735529 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/26/2018No. 18

- 10387

2 We review Lord’s arguments for plain error. See United States v. G erezano - Rosales , 692 F.3d 393, 399

- 400 (5th Cir. 2012)

. To establish plain error, Lord must show that the district cou rt committed a clear or obvious error that affected her substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Even if she succeeds, this court will correct the error only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public re putation of the proceedings. See id

. The district court’s justification for imposing the particular terms of imprisonment and supervised release in this case implicitly acknowledged that Lord made 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) arguments , and the court rejected the m. See United States v. M ondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 36 2

– 63 (5th Cir. 2009)

. Thus, there is no clear or obvious error. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135. Further, her speculative arguments that the court likely would have imposed a lower sentence had it given more explanation fails to show an effect on substantial rights. See, e.g., Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d at 364

- 65. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10387 Document: 00514735529 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/26/2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Weston J. Stow

v. Civil No. 06-cv-378-PB

Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated October 31, 2006, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

September 12, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Weston J. Stow, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00378-PB Document 8 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 1
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from October 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2018-B |