alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1995...... 73.8 83.9 75.9 73.0 53.1 72.2 61.7 63.9 73.6 76.7 1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2006...... 75.3 56.9 68.0 70.4 84.1 91.8 68.7 66.1 65.5 79.8 2003: Q2... 69.2 53.9 63.8 67.1 74.0 84.0 66.7 62.8 54.8 79.9  Q3... 78.2 74.9 41.0 81.0 78.2 88.8 69.7 64.4 73.6 84.1  Q4... 74.9 75.5 53.0 75.3 67.4 87.1 66.0 65.6 61.6 83.4 2004: Q1... 69.4 65.2 62.7 66.8 55.1 86.3 64.5 66.2 61.9 72.3  Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Q4... 74.1 64.4 34.6 79.7 86.9 91.5 70.1 61.7 61.7 79.2 2005: Q1... 72.7 61.2 73.9 73.5 51.6 83.2 66.7 59.1 64.2 78.1  Q2... 82.7 64.7 78.6 74.9 89.7 95.4 65.8 64.4 69.5 88.9  Q3... 75.3 70.0 70.5 63.3 89.1 88.4 68.5 66.5 61.5 81.4  Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1 2006: Q1... 70.5 59.1 71.1 65.7 76.4 90.9 63.9 64.5 62.7 74.0  Q2... 75.9 68.7 69.8 66.0 85.6 90.8 68.8 64.4 70.3 79.4  Q3... 78.3 43.0 64.3 81.2 78.5 96.6 76.9 72.9 62.9 83.5  Q4... 76.6 62.7 67.4 74.9 91.4 87.1 65.4 62.3 65.3 82.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### KAOUGH v. HADLEY et al.

No. 1547.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1936.

See, also, 165 So. 748.

Clement M. Moss and Pujo, Bell & Hardin, all of Lake Charles, arid Gordon Boswell, of New Orleans, for appellants.

Vance Plauche, of Lake Charles, for appellee.

DORE, Judge.

In deciding the case of Thomas Augustus Kaough v. Everett L. Hadley et al., 165 So. 748, we have adjudicated upon every issue presented in this case, except the question of the quantum of damages. Under our jurisprudence as referred to in the opinion in the Thomas Augustus Kaough Case, it is clear that the wife, under article 2315, Rev.Civ.Code, is also entitled to damages. We conclude in that case that, since the husband and plaintiff therein had been awarded the permanent control, custody, and care of the deceased, and that the wife apparently had no association or maternal affection for or control respecting him, a greater amount was properly allowable to the husband.

We have therefore decided to reduce the amount of the judgment of the district court and award to the plaintiff in this *754case, Bessie Brooks Kaough, .the total sum of -$2,500,, and hence it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court in this case is amended, and accordingly judgment is now rendered in favor of Bessie Brooks Kaough in the sum of $2,000 against Everett L. Hadley and Commercial Standard Insurance Company, jointly and severally, with 5 per cent, .per annum interest from March 1, 1934, until paid; and, further, that there be judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Bessie Brooks Kaough, and against Everett L. Hadley in the sum of $500, with 5 per cent, per annum interest from March 1, 1934.

And it is further ordered that the defendants pay all costs to be taxed in this and the district court.

OTT, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         158,500
<SECURITIES>                                    40,130
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (236)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217,041
<PP&E>                                         472,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                 211,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 488,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,899
<BONDS>                                         90,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,987<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,309<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   488,032
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<FN>
<F1>  REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $12,500 ALLOCABLE TO 125,000 SHARES OF TREASURY
      STOCK.
<F2>  REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $2,746,000 ALLOCABLE TO 125,000 SHARES OF
      TREASURY STOCK.
                                     -16-
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41994
          69
          10
          11
          15
          33
          .187
          .026
          .032
          .037
          .0821995
          51
          -2
          14
          13
          25
          .131
          -.004
          .039
          .032
          .0611996
          95
          16
          27
          24
          30
          .240
          .039
          .070
          .058
          .0711997
          93
          6
          19
          19
          50
          .230
          .014
          .049
          .045
          .1121998
          87
          4
          15
          24
          45
          .198
          .008
          .036
          .051
          .0951999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          175
          34
          35
          48
          58
          .382
          .074
          .080
          .108
          .1282004
          129
          28
          17
          46
          38
          .284
          .062
          .039
          .099
          .0812005
          n.a.
          8
          16
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .035
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 27, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

HARVEY L. MATTHEWS, JR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 916 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,300
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     21,228
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,387
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,324
<LOANS>                                        133,641
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,596
<DEPOSITS>                                     173,097
<SHORT-TERM>                                       707
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,677
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,924
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 192,596
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,859
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,897
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   241
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,997
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,253
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,673
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (30)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (22)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,825
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,825
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.43
<LOANS-NON>                                        581
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,702
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                       205
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,877
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                67
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2001

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the application

of the excise tax imposed on bows and arrows.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mr. BARCIA (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. CAMP, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. RYAN

of Wisconsin, Mr. TANNER, Mr. SHAW, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr.

FOLEY, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. WATKINS, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr.

ISAKSON, Mr. DICKS, Mr. CANNON, Mr. JOHN, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr.

MORAN of Kansas, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. ROGERS of

Michigan, Mr. REHBERG, and Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify

the application of the excise tax imposed on bows and arrows.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arrow Excise Tax Sim5 plification Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 2001 IH

1 SEC. 2. SIMPLIFICATION OF EXCISE TAX IMPOSED ON

2 BOWS AND ARROWS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section

4 4161(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

5 to bows and arrows, etc.) are amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(1) BOWS.—There is hereby imposed on the

7 sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of

8 any compound bow or crossbow which has a draw

9 weight of 30 pounds or more, and any recurve or

10 long bow which has a draw weight of 30 pounds or

11 more measured at a draw length of 28 inches, a tax

12 equal to 11 percent of the price for which so sold.

13 ‘‘(2) ARROWS.—

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby im15 posed on the sale by the manufacturer, pro16 ducer, or importer—

17 ‘‘(i) of any arrow shaft, a tax equal to

18 11 percent of the price for which so sold,

19 and

20 ‘‘(ii) of any arrow, a tax equal to 10

21 percent of the price for which so sold.

22 The tax imposed by clause (ii) on an arrow

23 shall not apply if the arrow contains an arrow

24 shaft subject to the tax imposed by clause (i).
3

•HR 2001 IH

1 ‘‘(B) ARROW SHAFT.—For purposes of this

2 paragraph, the term ‘arrow shaft’ means any

3 arrow shaft—

4 ‘‘(i) which measures 16 inches overall

5 or more in length, or

6 ‘‘(ii) which measures less than 16

7 inches overall in length but is suitable for

8 use with a bow described in paragraph (1).

9 ‘‘(C) ARROW.—For purposes of this para10 graph, the term ‘arrow’ means any arrow shaft

11 to which additional components are attached.’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 this section shall apply to articles sold by the manufac14 turer, producer, or importer after December 31, 2001.

Æ
#### Ali Reza DADI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Christine G. DAVIS; Joseph Haro, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 03-20260.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 19, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Ali Reza Dadi (“Dadi”), federal prisoner number 59270-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus as a successive or time-barred 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Dadi argues for the first time on appeal that his petition was erroneously-construed and erroneously transferred because he was challenging an INS detainer, not his convictions or sentence. Dadi also argues for the first time on appeal that the district court judge should have recused himself. This court will consider an issue that is raised for the first time on appeal only if the issue “presents a purely legal question and failure to address it would result in grave injustice.” *Kelly v. Foti,*77 F.3d 819, 822 (5th Cir.1996). Because no grave injustice would result from declining to consider Dadi’s arguments and the recusal issue is not purely a legal question, the court will not consider the issues raised by Dadi. *See id.*

As there is no argument properly before this court, the appeal is frivolous and is dismissed as such. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. Civil No. 06-cv-479-PB

William Wrenn, et al.

ORDER

Re: Document No. 25, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Ruling: Motion granted. The records of this court demonstrate

that plaintiff, while incarcerated, brought at least three actions

in a court of the United States that were dismissed on the grounds

that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. This case shall be dismissed without prejudice unless

plaintiff pays the filing fees within 30 days.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

District Judge

Date: October 9, 2007

cc: William Carey, pro se 

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00479-PB Document 43 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996<F1>         DEC-31-1995<F1>
<CASH>                                           2,403                  30,105
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,437                  12,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,736                  39,990
<PP&E>                                          25,442                  30,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,535                 109,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,564                  59,546
<BONDS>                                         58,264                 100,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            74                      37
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,093)                (35,221)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,535                 109,262
<SALES>                                          2,179                   1,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,422                  43,194
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,293                  45,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,215                  36,559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,078                   9,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,129                 (2,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       312                   (157)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,817                 (2,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,817                 (2,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26                  (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25                  (0.61)
<FN>
<F1>THE DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995 FINANCIAL DATA HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT A
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING METHOD RETROACTIVELY APPLIED BY THE COMPANY IN FISCAL 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001023727
<NAME>                        ENDLESS YOUTH PRODUCTS, INC.

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      165
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            165
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   108,125
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  3,306
<OTHER-SE>                             (116,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                165
<SALES>                                  36,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         36,720
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            27,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           9,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       9,263
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              9,263
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>