alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILING. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          41,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,956
<PP&E>                                           5,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,931)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,503
<SALES>                                          7,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,778
<CGS>                                            1,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,165
<INCOME-TAX>                                       812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1877 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1877

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that certain sexual 
 crimes against children are predicate crimes for the interception of 
                communications, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1877

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that certain sexual 
 crimes against children are predicate crimes for the interception of 
                communications, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Sex Crimes Wiretapping Act of 
2002''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS IN THE 
              INVESTIGATION OF SEXUAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Section 2516(1)(c) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2251 and 2252'' and inserting ``2251, 
        2251A, 2252, and 2252A''; and
            (2) by inserting ``section 2423(b) (relating to travel with 
        intent to engage in a sexual act with a juvenile),'' after 
        ``motor vehicle parts),''.
    (b) Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity.--Section 2516(1) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (q);
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (q) the following:
            ``(r) a violation of section 2422 (relating to coercion and 
        enticement) and section 2423(a) (relating to transportation of 
        minors) of this title, if, in connection with that violation, 
        the intended sexual activity would constitute a felony 
        violation of chapter 109A or 110, including a felony violation 
        of chapter 109A or 110 if the sexual activity occurred, or was 
        intended to occur, within the special maritime and territorial 
        jurisdiction of the United States, regardless of where it 
        actually occurred or was intended to occur; or''; and
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (r) as paragraph (s).

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
CONSENT OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-89499) pertaining to
the 1984 Long-term Incentive Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-20503) pertaining to the 1987
Longterm Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-33623) pertaining to the Retirement Savings Plan,
in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44423)
pertaining to the 1991 Long-term Incentive Plan, in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-56403) pertaining to
the 1994 Longterm Incentive Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36743) pertaining to the 1997
Long-term Incentive Plan of Milacron Inc., and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70733) pertaining
to the Milacron Inc. Plan for the Deferral of Director's
Compensation, of our report dated February 8, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Milacron Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.





                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                              
                              
                              
                              
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 24, 1999
#### Luis ESCOBAR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Anthony NEWLAND, Warden, et al., Respondents—Appellees.

No. 00-56686.

D.C. No. CV-99-09415-FMC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 17, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Escobar, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and affirm.

Escobar contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling because his retained counsel did not notify him that his state petition had been denied, did not file a timely habeas petition, or in the alternative, failed to forward case materials or a pro se habeas petition. Escobar’s contention lacks merit because his counsel’s failures do not qualify as extraordinary circumstances warranting equitable tolling. *See Frye v. Hickman,*273 F.3d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.2001) (denying equitable tolling based *268on counsel’s negligence), *cert. denied,*535 U.S. 1055, 122 S.Ct. 1913, 152 L.Ed.2d 823 (2002); *Miranda v. Castro,*292 F.3d 1063, 1067-68 (9th Cir.) (rejecting equitable tolling claim despite counsel’s miscalculation of the AJEDPA deadline), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 496, 154 L.Ed.2d 399 (2002).

Escobar also contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling because he was denied access to legal materials in the law library while in administrative segregation. This contention fails because Escobar was placed in administrative segregation after his AEDPA deadline had passed. *Cf Miles v. Prunty,*187 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.1999) (requiring a petitioner to show extraordinary circumstances making it impossible to file a habeas petition).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eva BORBON-BORBON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50198.

D.C. No. CR-01-03199-JTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.*

Decided March 12, 2003.

Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Eva Borbon-Borbon appeals her conviction, following a guilty plea, and sentence for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Borbon-Borbon’s contention that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional following *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and that *Harris v. United States,*536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d *338524 (2002), overrules *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.) (en banc), *cert. denied,*535 U.S. 1105, 122 S.Ct. 2314, 152 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2002), is foreclosed by *United States v. Hernandez,*322 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2003). Borbon-Borbon’s conviction is

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Deborah C. Aumand et al.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-434-JL

Dartmouth Hitchcock

Medical Center

 O R D E R

The plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (document no. 31) is

GRANTED. The court apologizes for the delayed ruling, in that it

reviewed the parties’ filings weeks ago but inadvertently did not

notify the Deputy Clerk of its ruling. The plaintiff has

established "good cause" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and the

O'Connell case, 357 F. 3d 152 (2004). The motion's timing and

nature establish that it is not dilatory or made in bad faith, is

not unduly delayed, does not involve repeated failures to cure

deficiencies, creates no undue or substantial prejudice, and is

not substantively or procedurally futile or frivolous.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 5, 2008

cc: Heather M. Burns, Esq.

Gary B. Richardson, Esq.

Thomas V. Laprade, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00434-JL Document 38 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Robert H. Daskal    |
|----------------------------------------|
| Robert                H. Daskal        |
| Chief                Financial Officer |
| May                15, 2008            |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-49-PB

Michael L. Cecchetti

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

July 8, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to prepare a defense. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 8, 2008 to October 7, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:08-cr-00049-PB Document 9 Filed 06/23/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 26, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

September 25, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 23, 2008

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Clyde Garrigan, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00049-PB Document 9 Filed 06/23/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers

v. Civil No. 07-cv-326-PB

NH State Prison, Warden, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $2.80 is due no later than

November 15, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the NH

State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until

the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay the fee as

ordered will result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. 

In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis

has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 19, 2007

cc: Randolph L. Chambers, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 NH State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00326-JL Document 6 Filed 10/19/07 Page 1 of 1
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, FPercent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rateVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 533,401 121,870 115,683 107,880 64,707 457 19,03Number of loans 9,346 1,681 2,057 2,916 709 30 44Weighted average maturity (months)1 26.58 23.22 14.66 19.67 86.19 48.88 15.3

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 12.86 12.86 4.91 11.89 33.07 .19 13.7

Weighted average risk rating3 2.28 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 7.51 7.30 7.08 7.62 7.42 9.58 8.3

 Standard error5 .17 .29 .25 .18 .29 n.a. .3

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 8.24 7.38 7.52 8.25 8.06 9.58 8.7 25th percentile 6.93 6.64 6.00 6.70 6.93 9.58 8.1 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.93 7.83 6.71 6.52 9.41 n.a. 6.7 Other livestock 8.08 8.11 n.a. 8.75 8.57 n.a. 8.4 Other current operating expenses7 7.61 7.24 7.01 7.77 7.92 9.58 8.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.94 8.43 8.51 7.43 7.64 n.a. 7.2 Farm real estate 7.35 6.96 n.a. 7.88 7.76 n.a. 7.2 Other8 6.56 6.78 7.48 6.35 6.18 n.a. 7.8

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 42.74 23.48 73.43 25.17 60.51 100.00 8.8 Under commitment 44.71 35.84 72.88 48.10 46.21 100.00 29.0 Callable 29.68 19.80 56.73 8.65 3.09 n.a. 12.1 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.20 3.08 24.23 7.99 .67 n.a. 3.2 Other livestock 7.71 4.25 5.19 6.60 .39 n.a. 27.6 Other current operating expenses7 64.72 77.38 62.96 62.75 56.23 100.00 60.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.92 4.19 3.63 6.98 5.27 n.a. 1.0 Farm real estate 5.76 2.71 n.a. 8.98 9.57 n.a. 4.5 Other8 7.69 8.40 3.99 6.69 27.87 n.a. 2.7

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 21.50 19.47 3.99 41.03 39.62 n.a. 4.5 Other 74.43 73.10 94.67 55.35 n.a. n.a. n.a Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Navidec, Inc. (the
"Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R.
McKowen, as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ John R. McKowen
-------------------
John R. McKowen
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
May 14, 2004
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: January 25, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Russell Scrocca 

v. Civil No. 08-cv-42-JL

Alton Police Department et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated 2/12/08, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

April 14, 2008 /s/ Joseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Richard C. Mooney , Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00042-JL Document 5 Filed 04/14/08 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:08-cv-00406-JL   Document 11   Filed 10/30/08   Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin T. Michaels, Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS       
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Kevin T. Michaels           
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rosemary A . Gilroy

V .

James Kasper, et al .

Civil No . 07-cv-300-JL

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated February 4, 2008, no objection having been filed .

SO ORDERED.

March 3, 2008 /s/ Joseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc : Rosemary A . Gilroy, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00300-JL Document 11 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 1
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 16 82

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ru th Ric ht er ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Co m m is si on er, So ci al Secu rit y Adm in is tra ti on ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof Ne br as ka- Om ah a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 30 , 20 18 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 5, 2 01 8 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Ru th Ri ch te r ap pe al s fro m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t gr an ti ng th e So ci al 1 Secu rit y Adm in is tra ti on Co m m is si on er’s m ot io n to di sm is s he r ci vi l act io n ari si ng
The Hon or ab le Ri ch ard G. Kop f, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Nebr as ka

.fro m th e 19 99 te rm in at io n of he r supp le m en ta l se cu rit y in co m e. W e ha ve th or ou gh ly

rev ie wed th e reco rd an d fin d no erro r warra nt in g rev ers al

. See Je nk in s v. Kan sa s Ci ty Mo . S ch . Di st ., 5 16 F.3 d 10 74 , 1 0 8 0 ( 8 t h C i r . 2 00 8) (“ W e rev ie w i ss ue s of subjec t m at te r juri sd ic ti on de no vo .”). Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t. See 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B. W e d en y

as m oo t t he Co m

m is si on er’s p en di ng m ot io n t o d is m is s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-