alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 327,516 37,818 62,770 43,786 49,447 67,32Number of loans 16,722 9,685 4,239 1,304 792 54Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.64 10.07 15.55 17.50 28.54 26.0

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 11.09 5.81 10.25 6.88 15.04 11.9

Weighted average risk rating3 2.48 2.22 2.35 2.65 2.24 2.4

Weighted average interest rate4 6.51 6.92 6.90 6.74 6.71 6.4

 Standard error5 .17 .13 .06 .15 .26 .3 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.38 7.73 7.69 7.52 7.45 7.0 25th percentile 5.90 6.11 6.00 5.90 6.18 6.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.34 6.78 6.44 6.20 6.10 n. Other livestock 6.99 7.12 7.04 7.23 7.48 6.5 Other current operating expenses7 6.71 6.90 6.90 6.66 6.75 6.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.70 6.71 7.23 6.74 6.11 5.4 Farm real estate 5.24 6.52 6.40 6.91 6.50 6.3 Other8 5.28 7.41 6.36 6.77 n.a. n.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 42.45 39.86 41.45 37.87 36.09 46.9 Under commitment 55.49 49.46 49.28 55.73 61.52 56.5 Callable 21.26 17.13 12.83 17.68 9.83 41.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 3.26 2.96 6.86 6.27 5.08 n. Other livestock 14.35 7.94 12.05 15.27 14.89 14.2 Other current operating expenses7 53.59 77.74 61.99 58.00 58.36 65.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 13.36 6.40 14.20 14.67 15.72 5.9 Farm real estate 10.16 .43 .27 3.32 5.95 13.9 Other8 5.29 4.53 4.64 2.47 n.a. n.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 17.05 6.24 11.82 16.49 18.31 15.8 Other 77.28 87.51 84.24 80.66 79.96 84.1 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
#### Ferial Karen ARDALAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Thomas WHITE, Secretary, Department of the Army; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-15335.

D.C. No. CV-01-20935-JW/PVT.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 13, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Ardalan’s request for oral argument.

MEMORANDUM **

Ferial Karen Ardalan appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her action with prejudice. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Gregory v. Widnall,*153 F.3d 1071, 1074 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam), we affirm.

The gravamen of Ardalan’s action is that she has learned that the defendants engaged in a pattern of fraudulent conduct designed to defeat her earlier employment discrimination action, *Ardalan v. Caldera,*No. CV-99-20465-JW (N.D.Cal.), *aff'd,*24 Fed.Appx. 827 (9th Cir.2001) *(“Ardalan*/”). The district court properly dismissed Ardalan’s action on res judicata grounds because all of the claims alleged therein had either been fully and fairly litigated in her prior district court action, or could have been litigated in that action. *See In re Imperial Corp. of Am.,*92 F.3d 1503, 1506 (9th Cir.1996). In addition, Ardalan failed to demonstrate that the defendants fraudulently concealed any of the allegedly newly discovered evidence from her. *See Costantini v. Trans World Airlines,*681 F.2d 1199, 1202-03 *&*n. 12 (9th Cir.1982). Finally, contrary to Ardalan’s contention, in dismissing *Ardalan I,*the district court considered the merits of that action, including her allegations of obstruction of justice by the defendants. *See In re Imperial Corp.,*92 F.3d at 1506.

*351The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ardalan leave to amend because amendment would be futile. *See Ashelman v. Pope,*793 F.2d 1072, 1078 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc). Ardalan’s contention that the district court did not review her pleadings prior to dismissing her action is not supported by the record.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2001: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
Case 1:06-cv-00361-SM Document 18 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00361-SM Document 18 Filed 04/06/07 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00361-SM Document 18 Filed 04/06/07 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00361-SM Document 18 Filed 04/06/07 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00361-SM Document 18 Filed 04/06/07 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-00361-SM Document 18 Filed 04/06/07 Page 6 of 6
H. R. 1766

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4270 John

Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ‘‘Stan Parris Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Stan Parris Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stan Parris

Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated: April 15, 2003                       /s/ Kari Stefansson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kari Stefansson
                                            Chairman, President, Chief Executive
                                            Officer

Dated: April 15, 2003                       /s/ Lance Thibault
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Lance Thibault
                                            Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
furnished to deCODE genetics, Inc. and will be retained by deCODE genetics, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1814

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 24, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the

Metacomet-Monadnock-Mattabesett Trail extending

through western Massachusetts and central Connecticut

for study for potential addition to the National Trails

System.
2

HR 1814 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Metacomet-Monad5 nock-Mattabesett Trail Study Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF METACOMET-MONADNOCK7 MATTABESETT TRAIL FOR STUDY FOR PO8 TENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL

9 TRAILS SYSTEM.

10 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16

11 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new paragraph:

13 ‘‘(ll) METACOMET-MONADNOCK-MATTABESETT

14 TRAIL.—The Metacomet-Monadnock-Mattabesett Trail, a

15 system of trails and potential trails extending southward

16 approximately 180 miles through western Massachusetts

17 on the Metacomet-Monadnock Trail, across central Con18 necticut on the Metacomet Trail and the Mattabesett

19 Trail, and ending at Long Island Sound.’’.

20 SEC. 3. EXPEDITED REPORT TO CONGRESS.

21 Notwithstanding the fourth sentence of section 5(b)

22 of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(b)),

23 the Secretary of the Interior shall submit the study re24 quired by the amendment made by section 2 to Congress
3

HR 1814 RFS

1 not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of

2 this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives October 23,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.6



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the annual report of
Emerald Health Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2018 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Avtar Dhillon, MD, Executive Chairman
and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|April 30, 2019 | /s/ Avtar Dhillon, MD         | 
|-------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|               |                               | 
|               | Avtar Dhillon, MD             | 
|               | Executive Chairman, President | 
|               | (Principal Executive Officer) | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Emerald Health Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Emerald Health Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kristyn Graham

v. Case No. 07-cv-295-PB

NH State Prison, et al.

O R D E R

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead, is

designated to review the request for injunctive relief submitted by Plaintiff Kristyn Graham and, if

necessary, conduct any hearing that may be set.

In accordance with subparagraph (C), the Magistrate Judge shall file his proposed findings

and recommendations under subparagraph (B) with the Court, and a copy shall forthwith be mailed

to all parties.

SO ORDERED.

February 19, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Kristyn Graham, Pro Se

James W. Kennedy, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00295-PB Document 36 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. PH08-24-001; PH08-25-001]


Horizon Asset Management, Inc.; Order Tolling 60-Day Period for 
Action To Allow for Further Consideration

September 19, 2008.
    To afford additional time for further consideration of the matters 
at issue in the above-captioned proceeding, the 60-day period for 
action is hereby tolled. 18 CFR 366.4(b)(1), 366.4(c)(1). The temporary 
exemption or waiver provided by the regulations will remain in effect 
until such time as the Commission has determined whether to grant or 
deny the requested exemption or waiver. Id.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22614 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 72-1214.

#### Silverman *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 06-cr-8-01-SM

John Carney

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 22) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than June 5, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:06-cr-00008-SM Document 23 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: September 17, 2007 at 4:30 PM 

Jury Selection: October 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 30, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Mark Irish, Esq.

 Robert Rabuck, Esq.

 John Gillen, Esq.

 John Goggin, Esq.

 Keith Higgins, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00008-SM Document 23 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS WR-67,454-09 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/24/2015 5:35:47 PM Accepted 6/25/2015 8:16:37 AM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK RECEIVED 

### AUSTIN, TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 6/25/2015 ABELACOSTA,CLERK 

### EX PARTE 

### § § § 

### § CANDELARIO HOLGUIN, JR. 

### § NOS. WR-67,454-07 WR-67,454-08 WR-67,454-09
AGREED MOTION TO RETURN APPLICATIONS FORWRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS TO DISTRICT COURT
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: NOW COMES CANDELARIOHOLGUIN,JR., Applicant, andrespectfully asks this Court to return the above styled and numbered applications for writs of habeas corpus to the District Court for an evidentiary hearing and would show the Courtthe following: I. The writ applications filed by Candelario Holguin, Jr. in the Criminal District Court ofDallas County were received by this Court on June 22, 2015. They were assigned numbers WR-67,454-07, WR-67,454-08, and WR-67,454-09. II. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled in the trial court on Applicant's writ

Agreed Motion to Return Applications for Writs ofHabeas Corpus to District coJELBCmomc"
........ applicationsfor September 18, 2015. Thisis theearliestdateavailableforthehearing based on the availability of the witnesses necessary to resolve the issues in Applicant's writ applications. III. Anevidentiaryhearing is necessaryto properlyresolvethe issuesraised

### in the writ applications: These writ applications should therefore be returned to the trial court for further factual development at the evidentiary hearing on September 18, 2015. FOR THE ABOVE REASONS, Applicant respectfully asks that this agreed motion be granted.

AGREED: /s/ Laura Coats Laura Coats Assistant District Attorney Respectfully submitted, /s/ Robert N. Udashen ROBERT N. UDASHEN, P.C. Bar CardNo. 20369600 SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON ' 2311 Cedar Springs Road Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214-468-8100 214-468-8104 (fax) Attorney for Applicant

Agreed Motion to Return Applications for Writs ofHabeas Corpus to District Court- Page 2 

# j
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10.23
<PAGE>   2
[LAFARGE LOGO]
                                                        Paris, 9th December 1996


Olivier LUNEAU                                     To       Kevin GRANT

                                                   Copy     Larry WAISANEN
                                                            Mary Ann WILLOW
                                                            Stephane GODIN
                                                            Stephane SOLERE


SUBJECT :  LAFARGE CORP. BORROWINGS FROM PARENT COMPANY


This is to confirm the agreement that Transbanque and Lafarge S.A. will put at
the disposal of Lafarge Corporation an uncommitted line of credit for $100
million for one year on the following basis:

-  $ 15 million from Transbanque and $ 35 million from Lafarge S.A. to be drawn
   down in early December, 1996.
 
-  $ 50 million from Lafarge S.A. to be drawn down, if needed and if available,
   in the first quarter of 1997.

-  Pricing on a best efforts basis, with the understanding that the target
   price will be LIBOR plus 1/15 % (6.25 basis points) for periods of up to 90
   days. In all cases, at each drawdown or roll over, the pricing must be equal
   to or better than arms length pricing available to Lafarge Corporation from
   third party lenders, for tax purposes.

-  In the event that Lafarge S.A. and/or Transbanque need to use available
   credit for some other purpose, the unused portion of this line will be
   withdrawn and outstanding drawdowns will be repaid at maturity and not
   rolled over. Lafarge S.A. Treasury Department commits to inform Lafarge
   Corp. at the earliest possible date if such an occurrence is likely.

I look forward to working with you over the coming year.



                                             /s/ OLIVIER LUNEAU

                                             Olivier LUNEAU
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 62 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61592) and Amendment No. 513 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
      Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

     

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    September 6, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Lakeview Management, Inc.;

Lakeview Neurorehabilitation

Center, Inc.; and Lakeview

Neurorehab Center Midwest, Inc.,

v. Civil No. 07-cv-303-SM

Care Realty, LLC; and

THCI Company, LLC,

O R D E R

A further conference was held with counsel on April 6, 2010. 

Counsel advised the court that while they can agree on the

judgment amounts with respect to mathematical calculation, they

believe at least two additional issues must be resolved first —

one related to interest on rent owed after a substantial payment

was made, the other related to whether group home revenues are

properly recognized as “integral” under the lease terms.

To the extent factual disputes exist, the court may vacate

judgment and schedule additional trial proceedings, or, it may be

that contested factual premises are irrelevant at this stage,

having been waived by failure to litigate them at trial.

The parties have deemed it wise to discuss the issues

further in hopes of reaching agreement. A further conference

shall be held on Friday, April 16, at 10:00 a.m.

Case 1:07-cv-00303-SM Document 194 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

April 12, 2010

cc: Christopher H. M. Carter, Esq.

Daniel M. Deschenes, Esq.

Ovide M. Lamontagne, Esq.

Jonathan M. Shirley, Esq.

Leigh S. Willey, Esq.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00303-SM Document 194 Filed 04/12/10 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Felipe Preciado HERNANDEZ, aka Felipe, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50620.

D.C. No. CR-00-01097-SVW-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Felipe Preciado Hernandez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Hernandez’s counsel has filed a motion pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.