alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DAVID J. ELLIS,

Defendant.

4:23CR3060

ORDER

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed 

by the above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. 

After a review of the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is 

eligible for appointment of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 

U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of 

Nebraska.

IT IS ORDERED:

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the 

Federal Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender 

shall forthwith file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public 

Defender should decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of 

the Criminal Justice Act Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide 

the court with a draft appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and 

other identifying information of the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance 

with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for this district.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this 

order to the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska.

DATED this 30th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03060-JMG-CRZ Doc # 12 Filed: 06/30/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 36
**EXHIBIT 32.1**



**CERTIFICATION**



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Carnegie Development INC. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Timothy Barton, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert W. Bueker as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











|Date: July 25, 2022 |  | */s/ Timothy Barton*        | 
|------------------- |  | --------------------------- | 
|                    |  | Timothy Barton              | 
|                    |  | President                   | 
|                    |  | Principal Executive Officer | 
|                    |  |                             | 
|                    |  | */s/ Robert W. Bueker*      | 
|                    |  | Robert W. Bueker            | 
|                    |  | Principal Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,917
<PP&E>                                         172,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,447
<BONDS>                                         79,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           72,805
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,598
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,658
<SALES>                                         16,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,399
<CGS>                                            7,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (16,274)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (556)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (29.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (29.37)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-51-01-SM

Toan K. Nguyen

O R D E R

Defendant Nguyen’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 10). Trial has been rescheduled for the September 

2007 trial period. Defendant Nguyen shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than July 9, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 27, 2007 at 11:00 a.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00051-SM Document 11 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

 ____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 26, 2007

cc: Richard Monteith, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00051-SM Document 11 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2
FILED

June 9, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

JENKINS DENTAL ARTS, INC. ) C/A NO. 03A01-9606-CV-00184 

 ) BRADLEY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ACE CODENT, ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, )

INC., and HENRY SCHEIN, INC., )

)

Defendants, )

)

)

and )

)

)

ACECODENT INCORPORATED )

) HONORABLE EARLE G. MURPHY,

Defendant-Appellee. ) JUDGE

OPINION AND ORDER

On September 23, 1996, we filed our opinion in this

case. The Supreme Court granted the appellant’s application for

permission to appeal and remanded this matter to us by order

entered May 5, 1997. We were directed by that court to

reconsider this case in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in

Cobb v. Beier, S/C No. 03S01-9610-CV-00106 (Supreme Court at

Knoxville, April 28, 1997).

In view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cobb, we

find and hold that the motion of Acecodent Incorporated to

dismiss this appeal because of the failure of the appellant to

serve a copy of the notice of appeal on the clerk of this court

is not well taken and it is accordingly DENIED. To the extent

our earlier opinion, and the judgment filed pursuant to it, find

and hold otherwise, they are, to that extent, vacated and held

for naught.

We adhere to the remainder of our earlier opinion,

which held that the trial court erred in dismissing the
appellant’s complaint. Therefore, we now hold, pursuant to Rule

36, T.R.A.P., that the judgment of the trial court in this case

is erroneous, and hereby vacate same and remand this case to the

trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this

order.

Our earlier opinion and judgment as to the costs on

appeal are also vacated and held for naught. We re-tax the costs

on appeal to the appellee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

__________________________

Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.

__________________________

Houston M. Goddard, J.

__________________________

Don T. McMurray, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-017-01-PB

Yvonne Thrasher

O R D E R

On September 14, 2009, defendant appeared for a “probable

cause” hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on three alleged

violations of conditions of supervision. Defendant stipulated to

probable cause on the violations. I therefore find probable

cause to hold her for a revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that she will not flee and that

she poses no danger to any other person or to the community. She

has been given a prior chance and her drug use is now out of

control. Without an inpatient placement, she is a risk of flight

and a danger to the community. There are no conditions which are

likely to assure her presence and the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

Case 1:07-cr-00017-PB Document 35 Filed 09/15/09 Page 1 of 2
2

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 15, 2009

cc: Ken Churbuck, Esq.

 Robert J. Veiga, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00017-PB Document 35 Filed 09/15/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-87-01-SM

James Clark

O R D E R

Defendant Clark’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 8). Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2007

trial period. Defendant Clark shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than June 11, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: September 28, 2007 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: October 10, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00087-SM Document 9 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 29, 2007

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Robert Kinsella, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00087-SM Document 9 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1606

AN ACT

To amend section 507 of the Omnibus Parks and

Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to authorize additional appropriations for historicallyblack colleges and universities, to decrease thematching requirement related to such appropriations, and for other purposes.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1606

AN ACT

To amend section 507 of the Omnibus Parks and Public

Lands Management Act of 1996 to authorize additional

appropriations for historically black colleges and universities, to decrease the matching requirement related to

such appropriations, and for other purposes.
2

•HR 1606 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DECREASED MATCHING REQUIREMENT FOR

4 HISTORIC BUILDING RESTORATION AND

5 PRESERVATION AT HISTORICALLY BLACK

6 COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES; AUTHORIZA7 TION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

8 (a) DECREASED MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—Sec9 tion 507(c) of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Man10 agement Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 16 U.S.C.

11 470a note) is amended—

12 (1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the

13 following new paragraph:

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para15 graph (2), the Secretary may obligate funds made

16 available under subsection (d) for a grant with re17 spect to a building or structure listed on, or eligible

18 for listing on, the National Register of Historic

19 Places only if the grantee agrees to provide, from

20 funds derived from non-Federal sources, an amount

21 that is equal to 30 percent of the total cost of the

22 project for which the grant is provided.’’; and

23 (2) by striking ‘‘(2) The Secretary’’ and insert24 ing the following:

25 ‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary’’.
3

•HR 1606 EH

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

2 507(d) of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Manage3 ment Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 470a note) is amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘Pursuant to’’ and inserting the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(1) 1996 AUTHORIZATION.—Pursuant to’’;

7 and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new

9 paragraph:

10 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION.—In addi11 tion to amounts made available under paragraph

12 (1), pursuant to section 108 of the National Historic

13 Preservation Act, there is authorized to be appro14 priated such sums as may be necessary to carry out

15 the purposes of this section.’’.

16 (c) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—Subsection

17 (c)(1) of section 507 of the Omnibus Parks and Public

18 Lands Management Act of 1996, as amended by sub19 section (a), shall apply with respect to—

20 (1) funds made available under subsection

21 (d)(2) of such section, as added by subsection (b);

22 and

23 (2) funds made available under subsection

24 (d)(1) of such section, as amended by subsection (b),
4

•HR 1606 EH

1 that remain unobligated as of the date of the enact2 ment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1766 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 231
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1766

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                           November 16, 2001

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ``Stan Parris 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4270 
John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Stan Parris Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan Parris Post Office 
Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 231

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1766

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ``Stan Parris 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 16, 2001

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Navidec, Inc.
(the "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R.
McKowen, as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/  John R. McKowen
---------------------------
John R. McKowen
Chief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer


August 12, 2004
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1994...... 75.1 82.9 74.3 72.3 51.6 75.7 58.6 59.8 70.4 80.2 1995...... 73.8 83.9 75.9 73.0 53.1 72.2 61.7 63.9 73.6 76.7 1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2002: Q2... 75.1 56.2 72.9 74.5 52.8 89.1 69.6 67.6 72.9 79.3  Q3... 72.2 53.6 57.8 78.2 75.1 67.9 68.5 68.7 68.5 74.8  Q4... 81.4 78.1 65.4 81.8 37.9 93.5 67.6 62.8 68.0 92.2 2003: Q1... 74.7 64.0 79.5 75.4 61.7 86.0 68.2 67.5 63.7 80.8  Q2... 69.2 53.9 63.8 67.1 74.0 84.0 66.7 62.8 54.8 79.9  Q3... 78.2 74.9 41.0 81.0 78.2 88.8 69.7 64.4 73.6 84.1  Q4... 74.9 75.5 53.0 75.3 67.4 87.1 66.0 65.6 61.6 83.4 2004: Q1... 69.4 65.2 62.7 66.8 55.1 86.3 64.5 66.2 61.9 72.3  Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Q4... 74.1 64.4 34.6 79.7 86.9 91.5 70.1 61.7 61.7 79.2 2005: Q1... 72.7 61.2 73.9 73.5 51.6 83.2 66.7 59.1 64.2 78.1  Q2... 82.7 64.7 78.6 74.9 89.7 95.4 65.8 64.4 69.5 88.9  Q3... 75.3 70.0 70.5 63.3 89.1 88.4 68.5 66.5 61.5 81.4  Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1996: Q1... 100 * 4.00 23.00 5.00 19.00 26.00 18.00 4.00 1.00 .01 * * .01 * 1997: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 10.00 31.00 33.00 17.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1998: Q1... 100 * .01 13.00 4.00 23.00 32.00 22.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q1... 100 .01 4.00 17.00 17.00 29.00 23.00 9.00 2.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 2000: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 4.00 30.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * * 2004: Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the squarter.