alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited balance sheets and unaudited statements of operations found on pages
3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              94
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   200
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,849)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       294 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1736

To require that a commemorative postage stamp be issued recognizing the

courage of the American Indian at the Battle of the Little Big Horn.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To require that a commemorative postage stamp be issued

recognizing the courage of the American Indian at the

Battle of the Little Big Horn.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds that—

5 (1) the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty guaranteed

6 to the Sioux Indians exclusive possession of the area

7 in South Dakota west of the Missouri River;

8 (2) gold was discovered in the Black Hills of

9 South Dakota in the mid-1870s, and thousands of

10 miners, choosing to disregard the 1868 Fort Lar-
2

•HR 1736 IH

1 amie Treaty, began to settle the Sioux’s territory,

2 provoking them to defend their land;

3 (3) unwilling to remove the settlers and being

4 unable to purchase the land, the United States Gov5 ernment issued an order to the Indian agencies that

6 all Indians return to their designated reservations by

7 January 31, 1876, or be deemed hostile;

8 (4) on June 25, 1876, the Sioux Indians, led by

9 Chief Sitting Bull, were camped in the valley of the

10 Little Bighorn River and were joined by 3,000 more

11 Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho warriors; they were

12 attacked by the 7th Calvary, led by General George

13 Armstrong Custer; the Indians surrounded the 7th

14 Calvary and killed all 210 soldiers, including General

15 Custer; and

16 (5) the Battle of the Little Big Horn has been

17 recognized as one of the single greatest victories won

18 by the American Indian, and the attack led by Gen19 eral Custer was one of the greatest fiascoes the

20 United States Army has ever been forced to endure.

21 SEC. 2. COMMEMORATIVE STAMP.

22 The Postmaster General shall take such measures as

23 may be necessary to provide for the issuance of a com-
3

•HR 1736 IH

1 memorative postage stamp recognizing the courage of the

2 American Indian at the Battle of the Little Big Horn.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         491,733
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,111,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                   686,594
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,651,087
<PP&E>                                         707,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                 464,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,595,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,347,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        12,631
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,926,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,314,583
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,947,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             313,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                367,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                   126,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   240,589
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.019
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.019


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Darryl E. Bickham

v.

New Hampshire State Prison, Warden

No. 07-fp-064

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-064-PB.

SO ORDERED.

ames R. Muirhead

Date: March 9, 2007

ed States Magistrate Judge

cc: Darryl E. Bickham, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00064-JL Document 3 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 1
42

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2001: Q1... 38 43 20 21 67 13 45 4

 Q2... 35 47 18 22 69 9 50 4

 Q3... 28 59 13 16 75 9 38 5

 Q4... 49 39 12 29 64 7 57 3

2002: Q1... 8 32 60 16 63 21 10 3

 Q2... 58 41 2 19 68 12 49 4

 Q3... 58 33 9 34 60 6 55 4

 Q4... 48 22 30 27 56 17 46 3

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... 65 33 2 35 54 11 63 3

 Q3... 70 27 3 33 56 11 65 3

 Q4... 63 29 8 41 50 9 66 3

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                
|                      |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1746 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1746

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that the Secretary of 
  Veterans Affairs establish a single ``1-800'' telephone number for 
access by the public to veterans benefits counselors of the Department 
 of Veterans Affairs and to ensure that such counselors have available 
  to them information about veterans benefits provided by all Federal 
           departments and agencies and by State governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2001

   Mr. Baker (for himself, Mr. Simmons, and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to require that the Secretary of 
  Veterans Affairs establish a single ``1-800'' telephone number for 
access by the public to veterans benefits counselors of the Department 
 of Veterans Affairs and to ensure that such counselors have available 
  to them information about veterans benefits provided by all Federal 
           departments and agencies and by State governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 7723 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c)(1) The Secretary shall provide for a single toll-free (so-
called `1-800') telephone number to be available for access by the 
public to veterans benefits counselors of the Department.
    ``(2) The Secretary shall ensure that (in addition to information 
about benefits provided under laws administered by the Secretary) 
veterans benefits counselors of the Department have available to them 
information about veterans benefits provided by--
            ``(A) all other departments and agencies of the United 
        States and
            ``(B) State governments.
    ``(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term `veterans benefits' 
means benefits provided to persons based upon their own service or the 
service of someone else in the Armed Forces.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William P. Trainor

v.

Civil No. 07-cv-352-JD

United States of America

PROCEDURAL ORDER

The movant has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to

vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence ordered by the court

following the movant's conviction in United States v. William P.

Trainor, Criminal 04-118-JD-1. The court has reviewed the

motion.

The court orders the United States Attorney to file an

answer within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, which

answer shall provide a detailed response, with appropriate

references to the record when necessary, to each claim asserted

by the movant.

In the event that the United States Attorney contends that

the motion is not timely filed under the limitations provided for

in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or that it is a second or successive motion, 

a motion to dismiss in lieu of a response shall be filed within

thirty (30) days of the date of this order.

 SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

District Judge

cc: William P. Trainor, pro se

United States Attorney

Case 1:07-cv-00352-JD Document 3 Filed 10/31/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. Criminal No. 07-189-GZS 

 JASON GERHARD, 

 Defendant 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GERHARD’S MOTION 

TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FROM CONSIDERATION AT SENTENCING 

The Court now has before it Defendant Jason Gerhard’s Motion to Suppress 

Evidence From Consideration at Sentencing (Docket # 485), which seeks to prohibit the 

introduction of any evidence relating to a pipe bomb found in Defendant’s bedroom at his 

mother’s home in New York. Before trial, Defendant filed a Motion to Suppress the 

evidence resulting from the search of his mother’s home, but no suppression hearing was 

ever held. Rather, at that time, the government mooted the issue as to trial use by 

advising the Court that it would not use any such evidence at trial. See United States’ 

Consolidated Objection to Three of Defendant Gerhard’s Motions: docket #148, docket 

#151 and docket #154 (Docket # 172). In response, the government further stated that if 

it later determined “that it will seek to introduce said evidence (in its case in chief or 

otherwise) it will notify the Court and counsel in advance.” Id. 

Even if the evidence was seized in violation of Defendant’s Fourth Amendment 

rights, such evidence is admissible at sentencing. The First Circuit has addressed this 

issue and has held that even illegally seized evidence is admissible at sentencing, except, 

perhaps, in very limited circumstances. 

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 492 Filed 07/31/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Given the great weight of the precedent and following the unanimous, 

reasoned approach of our sister circuits, we hold that the exclusionary rule 

does not bar the use of evidence seized in violation of a defendant's Fourth 

Amendment rights in sentencing. We leave open the question of whether 

the exclusionary rule would bar the use of evidence when police 

intentionally act in violation of the Fourth Amendment in order to increase 

a defendant's sentence. 

United States v. Acosta, 303 F.3d 78, 86 (1st Cir. 2002); see also U.S. v. Stark, 499 F.3d 

72, 80 (1st Cir. 2007) (quoting with approval United States v. Acosta, 303 F.3d at 86). 

 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence 

From Consideration at Sentencing be, and it is hereby, DENIED. 

 

 /s/ George Z. Singal__________________ 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Dated this 31st day of July, 2008. 

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 492 Filed 07/31/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as of June 30, 1998,
and for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            3,510,803
<SECURITIES>                                     31,454,676
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7,392,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42,615,223
<PP&E>                                              463,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   54,111,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             52,544
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     54,111,995
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10,363,820
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9,700,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  154,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     450,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                         91,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 450,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        359,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .08
        


</TABLE>
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2002: Q4... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.5

2003: Q1... 6.7 6.6 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.0

 Q3... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.1

 Q4... 6.3 6.3 n.a. 6.1

2004: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 5.9

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.2

 Q3... 6.6 6.6 n.a. 6.3

 Q4... 6.8 6.8 n.a. 6.4

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2002: Q4... 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.5

2003: Q1... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.5

 Q2... 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.6

 Q4... 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2

2004: Q1... 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q2... 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.1

 Q3... 7.4 7.4 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.0

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2002: Q4... 6.8 6.7 7.0 6.7

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6

 Q2... 6.8 6.4 6.4 6.4

 Q3... 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.5

 Q4... 6.5 6.5 6.9 6.7

2004: Q1... 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.3

 Q2... 6.9 6.4 6.5 6.5

 Q3... 7.2 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q4... 7.4 7.0 7.1 6.9
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2002: Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2003: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.3 6.9

 Q3... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 7.1 7.2 6.8

2004: Q1... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.7

 Q2... n.a. 7.1 7.1 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2002: Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.2 6.9

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.6 6.7 6.4

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.7

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.9

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2002: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.6 7.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.1 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 6.5 7.0 7.2

 Q4... n.a. 6.5 6.9 7.3

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.4 7.1 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 6.8 7.2 7.1

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 7.4 7.8 7.7

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
II

Calendar No. 176

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 146

[Report No. 107–74]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

OCTOBER 1, 2001

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating the Great Falls Historic District in Paterson, New Jersey, as a unit of

the National Park System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Falls Historic

5 District Study Act of 2001’’.
2

HR 146 RS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING

2 GREAT FALLS HISTORIC DISTRICT,

3 PATERSON, NEW JERSEY.

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

5 (1) GREAT FALLS HISTORIC DISTRICT.—The

6 term ‘‘Great Falls Historic District’’ means the

7 Great Falls Historic District in the city of Paterson,

8 New Jersey, established as an historic district by

9 section 510 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands

10 Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333;

11 110 Stat. 4158; 16 U.S.C. 461 note).

12 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

13 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di14 rector of the National Park Service.

15 (b) STUDY.—As soon as practicable after funds are

16 made available to carry out this section, the Secretary

17 shall commence a study regarding the suitability and feasi18 bility of further recognizing the historic and cultural sig19 nificance of the lands and structures of the Great Falls

20 Historic District through the designation of the Great

21 Falls Historic District as a unit of the National Park Sys22 tem.

23 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section

24 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall

25 apply to the study required by this section.
3

HR 146 RS

1 (d) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit to the

2 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives

3 and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of

4 the Senate a report describing the results of the study.

5 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

6 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec7 essary to carry out this section.

Passed the House of Representatives May 9, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 176

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 146

[Report No. 107–74]

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study

the suitability and feasibility of designating theGreat Falls Historic District in Paterson, NewJersey, as a unit of the National Park System,and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 1, 2001

Reported without amendment