alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 74 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) and Amendment No. 683 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
      individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-63-PB

Scott Ledoux

 SEALED ORDER

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for May 5, 2009, citing the continued cooperation

of the defendant and the need for additional time to engage in

plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 5, 2009 to June 2, 2009. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00063-PB Document 28 Filed 04/29/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 23, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

May 26, 2009 at 3:15 p.m. 

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 28, 2009

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Michael Zaino, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00063-PB Document 28 Filed 04/29/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-216-PB

Shirley Bruce, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

December 4, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and prepare a defense. The

government and co-defendant Linda Lopez do not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 4, 2007 to February 5, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00216-PB Document 16 Filed 11/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The November 26, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 30, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 26, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Peter Papps, Esq.

Kenneth Glidden, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00216-PB Document 16 Filed 11/26/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CITY OF PITTSBURGH,

Petitioner

v.

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FORT 

PITT LODGE NO.1,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 34 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2023, the Application for Stay is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Carlo Alberto Sisto, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2019-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

March 23, 2020

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Carlo Alberto Sisto                                          |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Carlo Alberto Sisto                                              |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1866

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis

for granting requests for reexamination of patents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1866 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW QUES2 TION OF PATENTABILITY IN REEXAMINATION

3 PROCEEDINGS.

4 Sections 303(a) and 312(a) of title 35, United States

5 Code, are each amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: ‘‘The existence of a substantial new question of

7 patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent

8 or printed publication was previously cited by or to the

9 Office or considered by the Office.’’.

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

12 respect to any determination of the Director of the United

13 States Patent and Trademark Office that is made under

14 section 303(a) or 312(a) of title 35, United States Code,

15 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 5,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-54-PB

Walter Nichols

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and engage in plea

negotiations or prepare a defense. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to September 5, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00054-PB Document 11 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 24, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

August 27, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 21, 2007

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Peter Papps, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00054-PB Document 11 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William David CLAPP, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-4206.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 5, 2003.

Decided Aug. 21, 2003.

*280Brian M. Ely, Jessee, Read & Ely, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Rick A. Mountcastle, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

William David Clapp appeals his 180 month sentence imposed pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2000), for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). Clapp’s sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred in sentencing him as an armed career criminal because his 1976 Tennessee conviction for attempted second degree burglary is not a “violent felony” under § 924(e). We affirm.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), it is unlawful for a convicted felon to possess a firearm. An individual who violates § 922(g) faces a minimum fifteen-year sentence if he has three prior convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). To constitute a violent felony for purposes of armed career criminal offender status, the potential for injury is determinative. The court must focus on the fact of conviction and the statutory definition of the crime, rather than on the underlying facts of a particular conviction. *Taylor v. United States,*495 U.S. 575, 600-01, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). This court reviews legal issues concerning sentences de novo. *United States v. Daughtrey,*874 F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir. 1989). Similarly, the legal determinations attendant to the application of the Armed Career Criminal Act are analyzed de novo. *See*18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (2000); *United States v. Brandon,*247 F.3d 186, 188 (4th Cir.2001).

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions and find this appeal foreclosed by our decisions in *United States v. Custis,*988 F.2d 1355 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that attempted breaking and entering under Maryland law is a “violent felony” for purposes of 924(e) because of its potential for physical confrontation), and *United States v. Thomas,*2 F.3d 79 (4th Cir.1993) (same for attempted burglary under New Jersey law). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2004   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2005   | 0  | 0  | .  | .  | .     |
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1802

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the depreciation

of property used in the generation of electricity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 2001

Mr. HERGER (for himself, Mr. JEFFERSON, and Mr. ENGLISH) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the depreciation of property used in the generation of

electricity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY USED IN THE

4 GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY.

5 (a) DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY USED IN THE

6 GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (C) of section

8 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re9 lating to 7-year property) is amended by striking

10 ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (i), by redesignating
2

•HR 1802 IH

1 clause (ii) as clause (iii), and by inserting after

2 clause (i) the following new clause:

3 ‘‘(ii) any property used in the genera4 tion of electricity, and’’.

5 (2) 10-YEAR CLASS LIFE.—The table contained

6 in section 168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by

7 inserting below the item relating to subparagraph

8 (C)(i) the following new item:

‘‘(C)(ii) ....................................................................................... 10’’.

9 (b) DEFINITION OF PROPERTY USED IN THE GEN10 ERATION OF ELECTRICITY.—Subsection (i) of section 168

11 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new paragraph:

13 ‘‘(15) PROPERTY USED IN THE GENERATION OF

14 ELECTRICITY.—The term ‘property used in the gen15 eration of electricity’ means property used in nuclear

16 power production of electricity for sale, property

17 used in hydraulic power production of electricity for

18 sale, property used in steam power production of

19 electricity for sale, and property used in combustion

20 turbine production of electricity for sale. Such term

21 shall not include any property which, without regard

22 to this paragraph, has a class life of less than 10

23 years.’’
3

•HR 1802 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
II

Calendar No. 589

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1906

[Report No. 107–272]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 18, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

SEPTEMBER 11, 2002

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend the Act that established the Pu’uhonua O

Honaunau National Historical Park to expand the

boundaries of that park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pu‘uhonua o

5 Ho ̄naunau National Historical Park Addition Act of

6 2002’’.
2

HR 1906 RS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO PU‘UHONUA O HO ̄ NAUNAU NA2 TIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

3 The first section of the Act of July 26, 1955 (69 Stat.

4 376, ch. 385; 16 U.S.C. 397), is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘That, when’’ and inserting the

6 following:

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. (a) When’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following

9 new subsections:

10 ‘‘(b) The boundaries of Pu‘uhonua o Ho ̄naunau Na11 tional Historical Park are hereby modified to include ap12 proximately 238 acres of lands and interests therein with13 in the area identified as ‘Parcel A’ on the map entitled

14 ‘Pu‘uhonua o Ho ̄naunau National Historical Park Pro15 posed Boundary Additions, Ki‘ilae Village’, numbered

16 PUHO–P 415/82,013 and dated May, 2001.

17 ‘‘(c) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to

18 acquire approximately 159 acres of lands and interests

19 therein within the area identified as ‘Parcel B’ on the map

20 referenced in subsection (b). Upon the acquisition of such

21 lands or interests therein, the Secretary shall modify the

22 boundaries of Pu‘uhonua o Ho ̄naunau National Historical

23 Park to include such lands or interests therein.’’.
3

HR 1906 RS

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

3 as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 589

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1906

[Report No. 107–272]

AN ACT

To amend the Act that established the Pu’uhonua

O Honaunau National Historical Park to expandthe boundaries of that park.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2002

Reported without amendment
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40315 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN ANTONIO MARTINEZ

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 1026

- 1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Antonio
Martinez

- Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez

- Her nandez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40315 Document: 00514280485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017No. 17

- 40315

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’ s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40315 Document: 00514280485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 466,937 39,886 67,461 53,562 67,055 128,81Number of loans 19,255 11,172 4,336 1,631 1,008 87Weighted average maturity (months)1 42.40 12.05 13.25 15.95 25.68 43.1

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 11.47 6.54 8.03 8.40 12.40 18.3

Weighted average risk rating3 2.44 2.42 2.31 2.58 2.37 2.1

Weighted average interest rate4 6.28 7.05 6.76 6.26 6.24 5.9

 Standard error5 .14 .11 .07 .20 .09 .3 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.96 7.81 7.50 7.12 6.75 6.7 25th percentile 5.27 6.14 6.00 5.39 5.12 4.8 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.76 7.58 5.86 6.25 6.61 5.1 Other livestock 7.19 7.49 7.86 7.01 7.98 6.3 Other current operating expenses7 6.40 6.95 6.72 6.11 6.24 6.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.52 7.35 7.07 6.46 5.55 n. Farm real estate 5.86 7.46 6.49 6.08 6.24 5.6 Other8 6.28 6.63 5.69 6.34 5.72 5.9

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 56.43 51.12 46.68 51.99 38.52 51.9 Under commitment 54.73 62.78 54.51 58.25 50.55 43.4 Callable 28.28 20.01 16.43 21.23 25.34 19.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.15 2.50 4.50 6.40 6.26 9.6 Other livestock 5.15 8.36 9.12 7.27 4.50 5.9 Other current operating expenses7 51.12 74.27 71.91 62.07 65.35 24.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.99 10.31 7.78 15.10 8.75 n. Farm real estate 22.56 1.54 1.96 1.06 6.84 45.4 Other8 11.02 3.02 4.73 8.09 8.31 14.5

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 35.58 7.93 10.76 15.35 26.68 59.6 Other 61.39 84.22 82.05 83.53 65.04 40.3 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
---

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41995
          12
          0
          3
          6
          4
          .055
          -.001
          .011
          .027
          .0161996
          7
          0
          1
          2
          4
          .031
          .000
          .003
          .009
          .0171997
          16
          -1
          0
          3
          14
          .064
          -.003
          -.001
          .010
          .0541998
          6
          -1
          3
          0
          5
          .022
          -.004
          .009
          .000
          .0161999
          15
          0
          3
          5
          7
          .051
          -.001
          .011
          .015
          .0222000
          12
          -12
          3
          8
          14
          .037
          -.037
          .009
          .022
          .0402001
          42
          10
          9
          5
          17
          .123
          .030
          .027
          .014
          .0492002
          35
          8
          6
          5
          16
          .097
          .022
          .017
          .014
          .0412003
          32
          4
          6
          8
          14
          .082
          .010
          .015
          .021
          .0342004
          18
          1
          5
          2
          10
          .044
          .003
          .012
          .005
          .0212005
          17
          2
          11
          4
          0
          .039
          .005
          .024
          .009
          .0002006
          20
          2
          6
          1
          12
          .042
          .003
          .012
          .002
          .023 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: