alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1450 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1450

    To direct the Department of Veterans Affairs to establish a new 
    veterans benefits office in the State of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

 Mr. Foley (for himself, Mr. Mica, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Davis of Florida, 
Mr. Stearns, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Diaz-Balart, and Ms. 
Ros-Lehtinen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Department of Veterans Affairs to establish a new 
    veterans benefits office in the State of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Florida's Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS VETERANS 
              BENEFITS OFFICE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a second veterans 
benefits office in the State of Florida.

SEC. 3. REPORTS ON REDUCTION IN CLAIMS BACKLOG AT BAY PINES, FLORIDA, 
              VETERANS BENEFITS OFFICE.

    (a) Near-Term Reduction.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
submit to Congress a report setting forth a detailed plan for reducing 
during the succeeding six months the backlog of claims for benefits 
pending at the Bay Pines, Florida, veterans benefits office of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs.
    (b) Long-Term Reduction.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
submit to Congress a report setting forth a detailed plan for a 
permanent reduction in the backlog of claims for benefits pending at 
the Bay Pines, Florida, veterans benefits office of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mohammed N. Khan

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00064-JL

United Airlines, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers and

by telephone conference on July 31, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 17) is approved as

submitted.

Based on representations of counsel at the conference, the

following affirmative defense is stricken without prejudice to

being re-asserted if warranted by the evidence: laches.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 31, 2008

cc: Paul McEachern, Esq.

Brigitte Duffy, Esq.

Sarah N. Turner, Esq.

Dana L. Fleming, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00064-JL Document 24 Filed 07/31/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES P. IRVIN, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 231 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 1:06-cv-00011-SM Document 11 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.2



Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.



I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of
Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:



A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for
the period from November 2, 2020 through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s
performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 13, 2019 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc.
and John Deere Owner Trust 2019 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit
Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.





|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | Deere Credit Services, Inc.               
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                           
|                       |     |                                           
|                       | By: | /s/ Steven N. Owenson                     
|                       |     | Steven N. Owenson                         
|                       |     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Industrial Communications

and Electronics, Inc. et al.

v. Civil No. 07-cv-082-JL

Town of Alton,

David Slade, and Marilyn Slade

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

The Town of Alton and its elected officials, officers, and

agents shall forthwith take all necessary steps to effectuate the

issuance of all variances, permits, and other approvals necessary

for the construction and operation of the 100-foot wireless tower

at 486 East Side Drive, Alton, New Hampshire, shown in the plans

approved by the Alton Planning Board on February 15, 2011.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 24, 2012

cc: Steven E. Grill, Esq.

Katherine Blackall Miller, Esq.

Robert D. Ciandella, Esq.

Robert M. Derosier, Esq.

Christopher Cole, Esq.

Karyl Roberts Martin, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00082-JL Document 130 Filed 09/24/12 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert Lowe

v. Civil No. 08-013-JL

Sears Holdings Corporation

O R D E R

The preliminary pretrial conference was held in chambers on

March 5, 2008.

The Discovery Plan is approved as submitted, with one

change: the parties have agreed to initiate Alternative Dispute

Resolution no later than sixty (60) days after the plaintiff’s

deposition. 

By agreement of the parties, the following are stricken:

• the plaintiff’s claims for attorney fees, compensatory

damages and punitive damages;

• defendant’s 5th (unclean hands), 7th (waiver), and 13th

(doctrine of privilege) affirmative defenses.

The defendant will amend ¶8 of its Answer to clearly

indicate its position with respect to the plaintiff’s request for

a transfer and Mr. Ward’s response.

Case 1:08-cv-00013-JL Document 11 Filed 03/05/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

March 5, 2008

cc: Elizabeth B. Olcott, Esq.

Peter Bennett, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00013-JL Document 11 Filed 03/05/08 Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131243 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131243 COA: 258438 Macomb CC: 2002-002884-FC KENYON CLINTON, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
#### S. FRIEDLANDER v. H. H. SIMS.

No. 31790.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 10, 1935.

Stone & Stone, of Coffeeville, for appellant.

S. C. Mims, Jr., of Grenada, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
FIRST AMENDMENT
                              
                             TO
                              
                     PURCHASE AGREEMENT


      THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into this 27th day  of
April, 1999, (effective April 26, 1999), by and between  AEI
FUND MANAGEMENT, INC., a Minnesota corporation, ("AEI")  and
NOM  Muscle  Shoals,  Ltd., an Alabama limited  partnership,
("Seller");

     WITNESSETH, that:

      WHEREAS,  on  the 19th day of April 1999  the  parties
hereto executed a Purchase Agreement ("Agreement"), and

      WHEREAS,  AEI and Seller have agreed to amend  certain
terms  and  conditions  of  said  Agreement  as  hereinafter
provided;

      NOW, THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other  good
and  valuable  consideration, receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  it is hereby agreed between  the  parties  as
follows:

     1.Article 4 of the Agreement is amended to provide  for
       a   purchase  price  of  one  million  three  hundred
       fifteen    thousand   three   hundred   ten   dollars
       ($1,315,310.00).
     
     2.The  following  sentence  is  added  to  the  end  of
       Article  9:   "Seller shall pay to Buyer  at  closing
       the  amount  of  thirty-eight thousand three  hundred
       ten  dollars  as  reimbursement of  Buyer's  overhead
       expenses."
     
     3.Article  17  is  amended by deleting Seller's  former
       address  and telephone number and by adding  Seller's
       current  address  and  telephone  number,  which   is
       Newton  Oldacre  McDonald; 3841 Green  Hills  Village
       Drive,   Suite  400;  Nashville,  Tennessee    37215;
       Attention: Mark McDonald; Phone: 615-269-5444

      EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH ABOVE all other terms
and  conditions of said Agreement shall remain unchanged and
in full force and effect.



      (The rest of this page intentionally left blank.)
                              
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer have executed this
amendment to the Agreement effective as of the day and  year
above first written.


SELLER:                                   WITNESS:

     NOM Muscle Shoals, Ltd.              By: /s/ EH Camp III
     By: Corporate General, Inc.,
         its sole general partner         Print: EH Camp III

     By: /s/ William A Oldacre
             William A. Oldacre
     Its: Vice President




BUYER:                                     WITNESS:

     AEI FUND MANAGEMENT, INC.             By: /s/ Thomas E Lehmann

     By: /s/ Robert P Johnson              Print: Thomas E Lehmann
             Robert P. Johnson
     Its:  President
#### I. C. LITTLE v. Bennie DALOVISIO.

No. 2682.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 26, 1945.

Plauche & Plauche, of Lake Orarles, for appellant.

Chas. C. Jaubert, of Lake Charles, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Little v. Campbell et al., La.App., 20 So. 2d 627.

It is ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed and set aside, and it is now ordered that the case be remanded to *635the district court for trial in accordance with law and the views herein expressed; the cost of the appeal to be paid by the defendant, and all other costs to await the final termination of the case.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1753 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1753

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 419 Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ``M. 
                Caldwell Butler Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 419 
Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``M. Caldwell Butler Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``M. Caldwell Butler Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 20, 2001.

            Attest:

                                   Jeff Trandahl,

                                                                 Clerk.

                       By

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1753

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 419 Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ``M. 
                Caldwell Butler Post Office Building''.
```
#### Charles Daniel PINEDA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-16001.

D.C. No. CV-01-00119-JFM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 14, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Pineda’s request for oral argument.

MEMORANDUM ***

Charles Daniel Pineda, Jr., appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“AL J”) determination that Pineda was entitled to social security benefits beginning September 1994 rather than March 1981. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *362§ 1291. We review de novo the summary judgment, and we review for substantial evidence and legal error the ALJ’s decision. *Thomas v. Barnhart,*278 F.3d 947, 954 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s determination that Pineda was entitled to benefits beginning in September 1994, which was twelve months prior to Pineda’s filing of his application for social security benefits. *See*20 C.F.R. § 404.621(a)(1); *Rolen v. Barnhart,*273 F.3d 1189, 1191 (9th Cir.2001).

Pineda’s contentions that he was entitled to benefits beginning March 1981, pursuant to C.F.R. §§ 404.632 and 404.633, lack merit because Pineda failed to show an intent to file for benefits prior to September 1995. *See*C.F.R. §§ 404.632 and 404.633.

Pineda’s contention that his children are entitled to retroactive benefits lacks merit because there is no evidence his children applied for benefits. *See*42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1)(C); *Driver v. Heckler,*779 F.2d 509, 511 (9th Cir.1985).

Pineda’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      13, 2009 | /s/ Steven M. Payne                                                        |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Steven      M. PaynePresident                                              |   |
|                   |                                                                       |   |
| November      13, 2009 | /s/ Jerome I. Feldman                                                      |   |
|                   | Jerome      I. FeldmanChairman,      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2020

a0624 

# Order

Clerk July 1, 2020

161008

RYAN MENARD, by his conservator,

SHELLY MENARD,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161008

COA: 336220

Macomb CC: 2014

- 003145

- NI

TERRY R. IMIG and SHARRYL ANN

EVERSON,

Defendants,

and

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

ROADS and COUNTY OF MACOMB,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the q uestions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gerard Joseph Bean

v. Civil No. 07-cv-328-JL

Northern NH Correctional FAcility, Warden

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated February 3, 2010. 

Further, as the petitioner has elected to forego claim #11, it is also dismissed,

along with claims #1 and #9. 

SO ORDERED.

March 30, 2010 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante.

United States District Judge

cc: Gerard Joseph Bean, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00328-JL Document 55 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1991...... 82.8 21.4 5.8 25.5 2.5 27.6 6.1 7.6 15.1 54.0 

1992...... 83.7 23.6 6.7 24.6 2.9 26.0 6.2 8.0 16.8 52.8 

1993...... 92.6 28.7 6.2 24.7 2.5 30.6 6.1 8.3 17.1 61.0 

1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 

1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 

1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 

1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 

1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 

1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 

2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 

2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 

2000: Q1... 59.4 3.6 4.8 37.6 6.3 7.1 4.1 6.6 12.7 36.0  Q2... 57.4 4.8 4.4 31.5 4.1 12.7 5.1 7.9 15.1 29.3 

 Q3... 42.6 5.1 3.7 23.4 3.0 7.4 3.8 6.3 11.3 21.2  Q4... 41.2 5.8 5.1 17.8 2.3 10.2 3.7 5.3 11.4 20.8 

2001: Q1... 54.3 3.6 4.3 23.7 4.7 18.0 3.3 5.7 13.9 31.4 

 Q2... 58.0 4.1 5.5 25.9 6.7 15.9 4.8 7.1 14.1 32.1 

 Q3... 38.6 4.1 3.5 17.7 2.8 10.5 3.7 5.3 10.2 19.5 

 Q4... 55.6 8.4 5.6 19.4 2.4 19.8 3.2 5.6 12.5 34.3 

2002: Q1... 58.5 6.5 5.4 28.5 3.4 14.7 3.3 5.8 16.1 33.2 

 Q2... 57.9 4.7 5.0 33.1 2.5 12.6 5.3 7.9 15.3 29.4 

 Q3... 56.4 3.3 4.1 29.4 4.3 15.3 4.3 6.0 12.7 33.4 

 Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 

2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9 

 Q2... 44.4 4.9 3.8 22.9 4.3 8.4 4.0 5.4 13.1 21.9  Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1992...... 82 14 20 29 18 .237 .039 .062 .083 .050

1993...... 54 7 16 5 26 .155 .020 .049 .014 .069

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Carlos Lopez

v. 06-cv-305-PB

Somersworth Police Department, et al.

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated April 3, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

April 20 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00305-PB Document 25 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 1
* The Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation. 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0352n.06 Filed: May 4, 2005 No. 04-5597 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

__________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ON APPEALFROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT –vs.– ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SAMMIE L. ALLEN, ) ) O P I N I O N Defendant-Appellant. ) __________________________________________)
BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH and GILMAN, Ci rcuit Judges; and ACKERMAN, District Judge. * HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge. On December 18, 2003, Defendant Sammie L. Allen entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of willfully failing to file a federal income tax return for the year 2000, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. The plea was conditioned upon this Court affirming the District Court’s adjudication of five pre-plea motions. These motions are as follows: (1) Pre-Plea Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Abuse of the Grand Jury and Prosecutorial Misconduct; (2) Motion to Dismiss and Notice of Misprision of Felony by Sammie Allen; (3) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdictional Statement and Challenges [sic]2 Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Sammie Allen; (4) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over the Alleged Accused; and (5) Motion to Quash Indictment and Motion to Dismiss for Want of Personal Jurisdiction. After carefully considering the record on appeal, we find no merit in the Defendant’s legal arguments. Indeed, the frivolous nature of the Defendant’s motions, we think, betrays the conduct to which he ultimately pled guilty. The legality of the federal income tax is beyond all doubt, a proposition that can be made no plainer by repetitions or explanations. See Brushaber v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. , 240 U.S. 1 (1916). Accordingly, th e District Court’s adjudication of each of the Defendant’s motions is hereby AFFIRMED

.