alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barry D. Elkins, hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report of Direct General Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Direct General
Corporation.

  August 9, 2005        By: /s/ Barry D. Elkins
------------------          ----------------------------------------------------
       Date                                     (Signature)
                        Name: Barry D. Elkins
                        Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Chart 1

Number, Size, and Volume of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2004

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

1

2

3

4

5

Number of non-real-estate farm loans Millions, annual rate

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

10

20

30

40

50

Average size of non-real-estate farm loans Thousands of dollars

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

25

50

75

100

125

Volume of non-real-estate farm loans

3

Billions of dollars, annual rate
Chart 2

Maturity and Interest Rate of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2004

 Note. Effective (compounded) annual interest rates are calculated from the stated rate and other

 terms of the loans and weighted by loan size.

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

4

8

12

16

Average maturity of non-real-estate farm loans 20

Months

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

4

8

12

16

Average effective interest rate on non-real-estate farm loans 20

Percent

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

0

25

50

75

100 Share of farm loans with a floating interest rate

4

Percent
EXHIBIT 32.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Manchester  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended April 30, 2004, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Barry R. Steinberg,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 18, 2004              /S/  Barry R. Steinebrg
                                     -----------------------------------

                                     Barry R. Steinberg
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1799 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1799

To designate a United States Post Office located in Nathalie, Virginia, 
          as the ``Lewis F. Payne United States Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2001

  Mr. Goode (for himself, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Tom Davis of 
  Virginia, Mr. Schrock, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of 
    Virginia, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Scott, and Mr. Boucher) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate a United States Post Office located in Nathalie, Virginia, 
          as the ``Lewis F. Payne United States Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--The United States Post Office located at 2663 
Rockfish Valley Highway in Nathalie, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lewis F. Payne United States Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the post office referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed a reference to the ``Lewis F. 
Payne United States Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gerard Joseph Bean

v. Civil No. 07-cv-328-JL

Larry Blaisdell, Warden,

Northern New Hampshire

Correctional Facility

O R D E R

Gerard Bean has filed an addendum (document no. 51) to his

February 3, 2010 Motion to Reinstate the Stay (document no. 50)

in this case. Bean’s motion to reinstate the stay was denied on

February 4, 2010. To the extent the addendum filed may be

considered a motion to reconsider, that motion is denied. 

Bean is reminded that he has until March 5, 2010 to file a

notice in this Court indicating whether he would like to proceed

with his mixed petition or whether he would like to voluntarily

dismiss his one unexhausted claim and have the Court consider his

exhausted claims. If Bean fails to file the notice as directed, 

Case 1:07-cv-00328-JL Document 52 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
or declines to voluntarily dismiss his unexhausted claim, this

matter will be dismissed as a mixed petition. See Nowaczyk v.

Warden, 299 F.3d 69, 75 (1st Cir. 2002) (citing Rose v. Lundy,

455 U.S. 509, 513-21 (1982)). 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: February 11, 2010

cc: Gerard Joseph Bean, pro se

JM:jba

2

Case 1:07-cv-00328-JL Document 52 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, a 

Delaware Corporation;

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

J. ROLLINS CONSTRUCTION, INC., a 

Texas corporation;

Defendant.

8:23CV215

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the court’s own motion pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 455(a), which states: “Any . . . judge . . . of the United States shall disqualify 

himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Upon 

review of the parties and the record in the above-designated case, the undersigned judge 

shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the above-designated case pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 455(a).

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 26th day of May, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00215-BCB-SMB Doc # 7 Filed: 05/26/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 17
Probation Form No. 35 

(1192) 

Report and Order Terminating Probation /Supervised Release Prior to Original Expiration Date 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


for the 


DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. Crim. No. 07-CR-109-01-SM 

Gary Powers 

On September 16,2008 the above named was placed on Probation for a period of 2 years. 

He has complied with the rules and regulations of Probation and is no longer in need ofProbation 

supervision. It is accordingly recommended that Gary Powers be discharged from Probation. 

Respectfully submitted, 

(~ig-rk~ K · H I an "ess 

U.S. Probation Officer 

ORDER OF THE COURT 

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the defendant is discharged from Probation 

and that the proceedings in the case be terminated. 

Date this ____ day of___________, 20__. 

Steven J. McAuliffe 

ChiefU.S. District Judge 

Case 1:07-cr-00109-SM Document 30-2 Filed 09/30/2009 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:07-cr-00109-SM Document 31 Filed 10/05/09 Page 1 of 1
#### TREMONT v. BRASWELL.

No. 4934.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1935.

Herndon & Herndon, of Shreveport, for appellant.

*829Barksdale, Bullock, Warren, Clark & Van Hook, of Shreveport, for appellee. »

DREW, Judge.

. Plaintiff instituted this suit against the defendant for damages for taking possession of the property of plaintiff without legal process. Defendant acquired certain chattel mortgage notes on a 2-door Eord sedan belonging to plaintiff. Plaintiff also executed his note in favor of defendant for $75. Plaintiff eventually paid six of the chattel mortgage notes of $12.50 each, but fell behind in payment of the remaining ones, and defendant began to press him for payment.

On or about October 30, 1933, plaintiff went to defendant’s place of business and gave him a draft for $7, as partial payment on a note, and plaintiff claims that at that time defendant forcibly took possession of his car, without his consent and without legal process. Plaintiff thereafter filed this suit against defendant for $1,175, with legal interest from judicial demand until paid, itemizing his damages as follows:

(1) For the illegal and forcible taking of his property (the automobile) and the humiliation and inconvenience caused him thereby, $500.

’ (2) For monetary loss to him in his business as agent of pressing club, dry cleaning & dyeing establishments, and his radio repair work, $600.

(3) Equity in the automobile, $75.00.

Defendant admitted all allegations of fact in plaintiff's petition, except that he denied that he took forcible possession of the ear, and denied all other damages claimed. He averred that plaintiff came to his place of business and complained that the brakes on said car were not operating, and that plaintiff left the car with him, voluntarily, to have certain repair work done; and, further, by way of reconvention, defendant asked judgment for the balance due on the purchase price of the ear, together with the repair bill on same, to wit, $30, with recognition of the chattel mortgage and lien on the car, as repairman.

The court in oral opinion rendered judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands and gave judgment for defendant in reconvention, as prayed for in defendant’s petition, except as to the repair bill of $30. From this judgment plaintiff perfected a devolutive appeal to this court.

This ease involves only questions of fact. The question of fact which is decisive of the case is whether or not defendant took forcible possession of the car or whether plaintiff voluntarily left it with defendant for repairs, or in order to prevent further costs through seizure of it by defendant. The lower court held the car was left by plaintiff with defendant by agreement, and was not detained by defendant through force.

We have carefully read the testimony in the record, and cannot say the finding of fact by .the lower court is erroneous. The written review of the conflicting testimony.in the record would only require time and study, and it is of no material benefit to any one. Such being the case, we do hereby affirm the judgment of the lower court, with costs.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.





This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and Item
1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the “Trust”),
the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms
used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                        
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                                     |                                        
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                      
|                                     | Connie Coffey                          
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate    
|                                     | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Union Acquisition Corp. II (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
    of the Company.





|Date:
    December 30, 2019 | /s/
    Kyle P. Bransfield                                                                              
|--------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            | Kyle
    P. Bransfield                                                                                  
|                            | Chief
    Executive Officer (Principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1126160
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2467691
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   35866364
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        14361174
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          14579140
<LOANS>                                       49328098
<ALLOWANCE>                                     200000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               106939611
<DEPOSITS>                                    66029288
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1501542
<LONG-TERM>                                     673190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25921
<OTHER-SE>                                    38709670
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               106939611
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1965310
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1786429
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                126272
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3878011
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1478620
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1510388
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2367623
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1446575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1334217
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1334217
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    795170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.55
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     13000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                200000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               200000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            200000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00668-CR

Charles Newman Smith, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Michael Newdow, pro hac vice 

PO Box 233345 

Sacramento, CA 95823 

(916) 427-6669 

Rosanna Fox, NH SBN: 17693 

O’Brien Law Firm P.C. 

One Sundial Avenue, Fifth Floor 

Manchester, NH 03103 

(603) 627-3800 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-356-JM 

THE FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION; 

JAN DOE AND PAT DOE, PARENTS; DOECHILD-1, DOECHILD-2 and 

DOECHILD-3, MINOR CHILDREN; 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

THE HANOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT (“HSD”); 

THE DRESDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT (“DSD”); 

SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT 70 (“SAU #70”); 

 Defendants. 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 23 Filed 01/22/08 Page 1 of 3
FFRF v. U.S. Congress Motion for Protective Order January 22, 2008 

Pursuant to case law1 and Rule 26(a)(1)2 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, Plaintiffs move to have the Court enter a protective order that protects 

the true identity of the Plaintiffs (other than the Freedom From Religion 

Foundation (“FFRF”)). Submitted herewith in support of this Motion is a stipulated 

Protective Order agreed to by counsel for each party, and a Memorandum in 

support of this Motion. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ - Michael Newdow /s/ - Rosanna Fox

Michael Newdow, pro hac vice Rosanna Fox, NH SBN: 17693 

Counsel for Plaintiffs O’Brien Law Firm, P.C. 

PO Box 233345 One Sundial Avenue, #510 

Sacramento CA 95823 Manchester, NH 03103 

Phone: (916) 427-6669 Phone: (603) 627-3800 

E-mail: NewdowLaw@gmail.com E-mail: rosief13@comcast.net

January 22, 2008 

 

1 Doe v. Porter, 370 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2004); Doe v. Stegall, 653 F.2d 180 (5th 

Cir. 1981). 

2

 Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(1)(A) states that disclosures must be made “[e]xcept as 

... ordered by the court.” 

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 23 Filed 01/22/08 Page 2 of 3
FFRF v. U.S. Congress Motion for Protective Order January 22, 2008 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-356-JM 

Freedom From Religion Foundation v. U.S. Congress

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copies of 

(1)PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

(2)STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

(3)MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

(4)EXHIBITS (A)-(E) ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

were provided by electronic service to the Clerk of the Court via CM/ECF on this 

22nd day of January, 2008, causing these items to be served on: 

United States Defendants: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov

 theodore.hirt@usdoj.gov

School District Defendants: dbradley@stebbinsbradley.com

State of New Hampshire: Nancy.Smith@doj.nh.gov

 January 22, 2008 /s/ Michael Newdow

 Michael Newdow 

PO Box 233345 

Sacramento CA 92823 

916-427-6669 

NewdowLaw@gmail.com

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 23 Filed 01/22/08 Page 3 of 3