alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gregory Alan Gaylor

v. No. 05-fp-414

US Department of Justice

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $10.80 is due no later than

January 10, 2006. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $250.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

This case has been assigned civil number 05-cv-414-PB. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 6, 2005

cc: Gregory Alan Gaylor, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:05-cv-00414-PB Document 6 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-229-01-SM

Tony Rosas

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 23) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the September 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than June 2, 2008. On the filing of such waiver,

his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 24 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: August 25, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Jury Selection: September 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 27, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Michael Zaino, Esq.

 Mark Sisti, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 24 Filed 05/27/08 Page 2 of 2
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
___________________________________________________________________________

                    Other operating  Intermediate non-real-  Long-term real
Quarter                 loans 1           estate loans        estate loans
___________________________________________________________________________

  Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)
___________________________________________________________________________
2001: Q1...    |                9.7                     9.6             9.1
      Q2...    |                9.3                     9.1             8.5
      Q3...    |                8.8                     8.7             8.1
      Q4...    |                7.9                     7.7             7.2

2002: Q1...    |                7.4                     7.5             7.0
      Q2...    |                7.2                     7.2             6.8
      Q3...    |                6.8                     6.7             6.4
      Q4...    |                6.7                     6.6             6.3

2003: Q1...    |                6.5                     6.4             6.1
___________________________________________________________________________

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)
___________________________________________________________________________
2001: Q1...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q2...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q3...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q4...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.

2002: Q1...    |               n.a.                    n.a.            n.a.
      Q2...    |                7.7                     7.6             7.1
      Q3...    |                7.5                     7.4             6.9
      Q4...    |                7.2                     7.0             6.6

2003: Q1...    |                9.7                     6.9             6.4
___________________________________________________________________________
   1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production
expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry).
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit
conditions at commercial banks.

39
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, August 7-11, Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,028,600 33,058 71,916 68,522 110,478 177,5Number of loans 16,683 6,165 4,797 2,002 1,664 1,2Weighted average maturity (months)1 20.70 8.02 9.86 14.01 14.46 24.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 5.24 2.10 2.34 4.98 4.82 7.4

Weighted average risk rating3 3.23 3.14 3.07 3.06 3.04 3.

Weighted average interest rate4 8.44 9.24 9.05 8.85 8.64 8.4 Standard error5 .17 .09 .14 .04 .04 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.26 9.93 9.70 9.50 9.14 9. 25th percentile 7.60 8.51 8.42 8.42 8.09 7.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.42 9.31 9.42 8.59 8.41 8. Other livestock 8.10 8.73 8.65 8.72 8.71 8.4 Other current operating expenses7 8.70 9.28 9.04 8.93 8.83 8.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.06 9.31 9.68 9.19 8.66 9.4 Farm real estate 7.81 8.90 8.90 8.20 8.55 8. Other8 8.24 9.12 8.60 8.60 8.29 8.4

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 84.16 81.19 79.75 73.49 72.94 80. Under commitment 82.17 91.49 87.19 85.44 90.21 88. Callable 25.23 23.34 25.68 23.62 31.61 29. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 10.30 4.09 7.67 9.19 15.83 12. Other livestock 7.65 3.74 4.75 7.65 6.94 7.0 Other current operating expenses7 32.72 79.49 68.68 59.72 51.00 41. Farm machinery and equipment 7.78 4.69 6.92 10.16 5.12 7. Farm real estate 4.18 2.08 1.36 3.47 4.48 7. Other8 37.37 5.92 10.61 9.81 16.63 24.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 9.16 5.30 6.07 9.68 12.89 17.4 Other 80.40 85.82 88.07 86.69 85.57 75. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 152 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 152

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 payments made under Federal Government programs for the repayment of 
   student loans of members of the Armed Forces of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Bartlett of 
  Maryland, and Mr. Hansen) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 payments made under Federal Government programs for the repayment of 
   student loans of members of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Armed Services Educational Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PAYMENTS 
              ON STUDENT LOANS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by redesignating section 139 as section 
139A and by inserting after section 138 the following new section:

``SEC. 139. CERTAIN PAYMENTS ON STUDENT LOANS OF MEMBERS OF ARMED 
              FORCES.

    ``Gross income shall not include any education loan repayment made 
by the Federal Government on behalf of a member of the Armed Forces of 
the United States.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part III is 
amended by striking the last item and inserting the following new 
items:

                              ``Sec. 139. Certain payments on student 
                                        loans of members of Armed 
                                        Forces.
                              ``Sec. 139A. Cross references to other 
                                        Acts.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments in taxable years ending after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1997 1998 1999

2000

May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.p

1 Deposits .............................. 457 167 71 110 104 76 78 139 115 104 215

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 620,885 607,574 632,482 623,553 627,081 624,177 628,001 611,641 595,591 591,071 594,094

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 10,763 10,343 9,933 9,711 9,688 9,688 9,674 9,620 9,565 9,505 9,451

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
Exhibit 10.3


 


 Horn,


 


ADDENDUM
2 TO FOUNDERS’ AGREEMENT


 


THIS
ADDENDUM 2 TO FOUNDERS’ AGREEMENT (this “Addendum”), effective as of December 31, 2017 (the “Effective
Date”), is made and entered into by and between Triple-V (1999) Ltd. and A-Labs Finance and Advisory Ltd. (each a “Founder”,
and collectively the “Founders”). Each of the Founders shall sometimes be referred to as a “party”
and collectively, as the “Parties”.


 


WHEREAS,
the Founders hereto entered into a Founders’ Agreement, dated as of the September 1, 2017 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend the Agreement, as further set forth herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall bear the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.



 




		2.	The
parties agree that the Articles attached to this Addendum as Exhibit A shall be adopted by INX Ltd. and shall replace and
supersede any previous forms agreed upon between the parties.





 


		3.	Section
4.1 of the Founders Agreement, relating to the nomination of Board members, shall be deleted, effective as of the date hereof.



 




		4.	Unless
amended hereby, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





 


[THE
REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 


Confidential


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


Execution
Copy


 


[Signature
Page to Addendum to Founders’ Agreement]


  


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Addendum as of the date first written above.


  


 


	 	 	 
	Triple-V (1999) Ltd.	 	A-Labs Finance and Advisory Ltd.






 


Confidential


 



    	 	2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,996,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,931,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   205,000
<INVENTORY>                                    472,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,533,000
<PP&E>                                       4,465,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,068,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,631,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,535,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    30,976,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,384,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,531,000
<SALES>                                     12,706,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,706,000
<CGS>                                        7,457,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,457,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,110,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,644,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,644,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

VA MINCT GOURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

A!!S 09 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, ) FILED

)

v. ) CivilNo. 05-85-JM

Thirty Eight Thousand Dollars ($38,000.00) in )

United States Currency, More or Less, seized )

from Alvin Drake, )

Defendant in rem. )

ORDER COMPELLING TESTIMONY

On motion of the United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire for an Order

requiring and compelling Garrett Pratt to give testimony and provide other information and

evidence pursuant to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003, and

it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that :

1 . Garrett Pratt has been subpoenaed to testify before the United States District

Court in connection with the above-captioned case;

2. Based upon representations from the witness, after the witness consulted with

counsel, the witness has refused to testify on the basis of the witness's privilege against selfincrimination;

3 . In the judgment of the United States Attorney, the testimony or other information

from this witness may be necessary to the public interest; and

4. The aforesaid motion filed herein has been made with the approval of the Deputy

Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division of the United States Department

Case 1:05-cv-00085-JM Document 73 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
of Justice, pursuant to the authority vested in such person by 18 U .S .C. § 6003(b) and 28 C.F.R.

§ 0.175(a).

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6002-6003, that Garrett

Pratt give testimony or provide other information which this witness has refused or is likely to

refuse to provide on the basis of this witness's privilege against self-incrimination as to all

matters about which this witness may be interrogated during trial or in any proceeding ancillary

thereto. However, no testimony or other information compelled under this Order, nor any

information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information, may be used

against the witness in any criminal case, except for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise

failing to comply with this Order.

This Order shall become effective only if, after the issuance of this Order, Garrett Pratt

refuses to testify or provide other information on the basis of this witness's privilege against selfincrimination.

Dated: ?j(q I., U)Ked,States D LLiebdudge

2

Case 1:05-cv-00085-JM Document 73 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          32,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         31,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           306
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,840
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   520
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,468)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,494)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,494)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:  Registration Statements Numbers 333-116719, 333-116720, 333-71903,
     333-42874, 333-55803, 333-62982 and 333-62984 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 4, 2004 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm or a report prepared or certified
by an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm within the meaning of
sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.





/S/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
November 12, 2004



                                       21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

NORTHWEST BYPASS GROUP, et al.

Plaintiffs,

V.

U.S . ARMY CORPS

OF ENGINEERS, et al .

Defendants.

Civil No. 06-CV-00258-JAW

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY

On September 15, 2006, this Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for temporary restraining

order. See Order (Docket # 46) . Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration on September 24,

2006 (Docket # 50), and an addendum to that motion on September 26, 2006 (Docket # 54) . The

several defendants filed an opposition to the motion for reconsideration . See Def City of

Concord's Objection to Pis.' Mot. to Reconsider (Docket # 55); Objection of Concord Hospital

and St. Paul's School to Pls.' Mot. to Reconsider (Docket # 58); Federal Defs.' Memo. in

Opposition to Mot. to Reconsider (Docket # 65). In response, Plaintiffs moved for leave to file a

reply brief pursuant to Local Rule 7 .1(e)(2), attaching to the motion a copy of the reply it desires

to file with the Court See Pls.' Mot. for Leave to File Reply to Def City's Objection to Mot. to

Reconsider Order on Temporary Restraining Order with Request for Expedited Action (Docket #

57). This motion, in kind, was met with Defendants' opposition . See Objection of Concord

Hospital and St. Paul's School to PIs. 'Mot. for Leave to File Reply to City's Objection to PIs. '

Mot. to Reconsider (Docket # 59) ; Federal Defs.' Objection to Pls.' Mot. for Leave to File Reply

Case 1:06-cv-00258-JAW Document 67 Filed 10/31/06 Page 1 of 2
(Docket # 60); Def City of Concord's Joinder to Federal Defs.' Objection to PIs.' Mot. for

Leave to File Reply (Docket # 61).

The gist of the opposition is that Plaintiffs are using the reply memorandum to raise

arguments not previously briefed, and that the Court already has ample information to make its

decision . Notwithstanding these objections, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for leave to

file a reply (Docket # 57). To the extent Plaintiffs raise new issues, the Court sustains the

objections of the Defendants and will not consider those portions of the reply.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SITTING BY DESIGNATION

Dated this 31st day of October, 2006

2

Case 1:06-cv-00258-JAW Document 67 Filed 10/31/06 Page 2 of 2