alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

T.R. World Gym-IP, LLC 

T.R. World Gym, LLC

v. Civil No. 07-cv-358-JM

Fitness Management Orlando, Inc.

d/b/a World Gym West Orlando, et al.

O R D E R

Having considered plaintiffs T.R. World Gym-IP, LLC’s and

T.R. World Gym, LLC’s(“World Gym”) Motion for Default Judgment

(Doc. no. 14), the Memorandum in support thereof, the Declaration

of Christopher J. Rondeau in support thereof, the Declaration of

Teresa C. Tucker in support thereof, the default judgments

entered by the Clerk of this Court on January 29, 2008, the

Summons documents, Complaint and proof of service on file herein,

and all of the relevant papers and pleadings on file with the

Court in this matter, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

World Gym’s Motion for Default Judgment against all

Defendants is GRANTED.

1. The Defendants breached the License Agreement and the

License Agreement was terminated at least as early as June 25,

2007.

Case 1:07-cv-00358-JM Document 18 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 3
2

2. Defendants are jointly and severally liable to World Gym

for willful trademark infringement under federal law, 15 U.S.C.

§1114, et seq., for infringing the following federally registered

trademarks and service marks:

Trademark Registration No. Registration Date

WORLD U.S. Reg. No.

1,911,887

August 15, 1995

WORLD GYM U.S. Reg. No.

1,791,584

September 7, 1993

WORLD GYM FITNESS

CENTER, plus design

U.S. Reg. No.

1,856,427

September 27, 1994

WORLD GYM, plus

design

U.S. Reg. No.

2,499,267

October 23, 2001

WORLD GYM, plus

design

U.S. Reg. No.

2,268,311

August 10, 1999

WORLD GYM, plus

design

U.S. Reg. No.

1,354,193

August 13, 1985

WORLD GYM, plus

design

U.S. Reg. No.

1,783,000

July 20, 1993

3. Defendants are jointly and severally liable to World

Gym for false designation of origin, and false description and

representation, under federal law, 15 U.S.C. §1125, et seq.

4. World Gym is hereby awarded $3947.40 in unpaid royalties

and interest.

Case 1:07-cv-00358-JM Document 18 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 3
3

5. World Gym is hereby awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in

an amount of $4619.77.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 4, 2008

cc: Teresa C. Tucker, Esq.

 Donald J. Perreault, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00358-JM Document 18 Filed 04/04/08 Page 3 of 3
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, August 4-8, 2003Percent except as noted

Loan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rat

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,013,946 49,215 160,403 319,585 270,586 80,640 38,84

Number of loans 32,794 2,645 5,194 11,557 6,571 1,443 1,1

Weighted average maturity (months)1 32.04 9.58 55.67 25.52 24.25 12.55 22.0

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 6.56 2.28 5.20 6.28 2.74 .45 3.0

Weighted average risk rating3 3.20 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 5.34 5.44 5.57 5.47 4.46 6.07 5.

 Standard error5 .11 .44 .20 .16 .22 .31 .5

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 6.50 6.55 6.61 6.82 5.12 7.76 6.

 25th percentile 4.07 3.87 4.60 4.07 3.55 4.85 4.0

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.87 4.86 4.54 6.80 3.63 4.63 4.

 Other livestock 5.57 5.69 5.31 6.45 4.26 4.66 7.

 Other current operating expenses7 5.42 5.53 6.16 5.53 4.59 5.50 5.

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.12 6.81 6.68 6.48 4.60 7.69 6.0

 Farm real estate 6.12 n.a. 5.84 6.16 5.21 n.a. 6.5

 Other8 4.65 6.52 4.66 4.19 4.50 6.76 4.0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 76.68 69.21 57.89 74.70 96.85 97.89 76.4

 Under commitment 70.41 84.80 64.55 69.49 84.79 85.19 48.

 Callable 15.07 16.42 24.75 19.86 5.27 13.37 .

 Subject to prepayment penalty 4.48 .94 1.14 3.54 11.00 2.51 n

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 12.62 37.36 21.75 8.04 14.00 5.32 1.4

 Other livestock 6.76 14.40 16.04 5.89 4.16 3.14 1.

 Other current operating expenses7 42.83 36.40 39.51 43.51 44.00 51.48 46.

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.14 8.03 .84 8.44 8.99 15.32 14.

 Farm real estate 10.45 n.a. 19.01 8.03 6.12 n.a. 7.

 Other8 19.21 3.81 2.84 26.09 22.74 24.74 28.5

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 17.06 4.10 24.91 13.95 12.47 17.41 7.9

 Other 77.09 94.68 70.74 76.75 86.03 80.98 86.7

 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-133-01-SM

Francis Ndemi Mwangi

O R D E R

Defendant Mwangi’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 22). Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008

trial period. Defendant Mwangi shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than May 1, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 19, 2008 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00133-SM Document 23 Filed 04/18/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

April 18, 2008

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00133-SM Document 23 Filed 04/18/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5



<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION,  INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001023294
<NAME>                        Prime Succession, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 838
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       35,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6,761
<INVENTORY>                                         50,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    21,380
<PP&E>                                              77,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     384,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17,049
<BONDS>                                            209,558
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         116,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       384,243
<SALES>                                             48,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    48,095
<CGS>                                               30,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       30,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       525
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,272)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: May 17, 2010




By:  /s/ John Hummel


John Hummel


President (principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS Futures Management LLC


General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.




S-2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. Criminal No. 07-189-GZS 

DANIEL RILEY, JASON GERHARD, 

CIRINO GONZALEZ, and ROBERT 

WOLFFE 

 Defendant 

ORDER ON DEFENDANT RILEY’S 

MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS 

Now before the Court is Defendant Riley’s Motion for Bill of Particulars (Docket 

No. 86). The Government has objected to the Motion (Docket No. 116). Defendant 

Riley’s Motion shall be granted only if “in the absence of a more detailed specification, 

will be disabled from preparing a defense, caught by unfair surprise at trial, or hampered 

in seeking the shelter of the Double Jeopardy Clause.” United States v. Sepulveda, 15 

F.3d 1161, 1192-93 (1st Cir. 1993) (citing United States v. Abreu, 952 F.2d 1458, 1469 

(1st Cir. 1992) (collecting cases)). After a careful review, the Court does not find that the 

Superseding Indictment reveals a material inability to prepare a defense, untenable 

surprise, or other potential prejudice such that it is necessary to mandate further 

particulars. The Court, therefore, ORDERS that Defendant Riley’s Motion for a Bill of 

Particulars be, and it is hereby, DENIED. 

 /s/ George Z. Singal__________________ 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Dated this 8th day of January, 2008. 

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 117 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with this  Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly  Report of Manchester
Technologies,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended
April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Elan Yaish, Vice President-Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: July 5, 2005      /S/ Elan Yaish
                            -----------------------------------------
                            Elan Yaish
                            Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Louis Hebert

v. Civil No. 06-cv-429-JD

US Social Security Administration, Commissioner

O R D E R

On March 29, 2007, and again on April 10, 2007, the Court ordered that either a pro se

appearance or an attorney appearance be filed on behalf of the plaintiff. As the latest deadline of

April 25, 2007 has now passed with no appearance being filed, the case is dismissed without

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

April 27, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Louis Hebert, pro

David Broderick, AUSA

Case 1:06-cv-00429-JD Document 12 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Antonio Joe VALADEZ, Appellant.

No. 03-1291.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 28, 2003.

Decided April 7, 2003.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Joe Valadez pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession of a firearm during a drug-trafficking offense. On appeal, Valadez’s counsel has filed a brief and requested permission to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although we granted Valadez permission to file a supplemental brief, he has not done so.

After reviewing counsel’s *Anders*brief, along with our independent review of the record in accordance with *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75,109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court,* and we also grant counsel’s request to withdraw.

A true copy.

*

 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted September 19, 2012

Decided September 20, 2012

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge                                 

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

   

No. 12‐2204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY WASHINGTON,

Defendant‐Appellant.                 

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 11‐CR‐119‐BBC‐01

Barbara B. Crabb,

Judge.

O R D E R

While serving a 360‐month sentence on crack distribution charges, federal inmate

Timothy Washington stabbed a fellow inmate 16 times with a metal shank. Washington

pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to assault with a dangerous weapon and intent

to do bodily harm, 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). The district court sentenced him to 33 months’

imprisonment—the bottom of his guidelines range. Washington filed a notice of appeal, but

his counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw. See Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Washington has not accepted our invitation to respond to

counsel’s motion. See CIR. R. 51(b). We confine our review to those issues identified in

counsel’s facially adequate brief. See United States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d 968, 973–74 (7th Cir.

2002).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 12‐2204 Page 2

Counsel first notes that Washington does not want to challenge his guilty plea and

thus properly refrains from discussing whether the plea was knowing and voluntary. See

United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670–72 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel next considers whether it would be frivolous for Washington to challenge

his 33‐month sentence. Counsel correctly notes that the term is neither based on an incorrect

calculation of the sentencing guidelines nor in excess of the ten‐year statutory maximum, see

18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). As counsel recognizes, we would presume that Washington’s

within‐guidelines sentence is reasonable, see Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 350–51 (2007);

United States v. Pape, 601 F.3d 743, 746 (7th Cir. 2010), and counsel cannot identify any

reason to disturb that presumption. The district court adequately discussed the relevant

sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), noting the severity of the injuries of

Washington’s victim and the threat that the assault posed to the safety of the prison

generally, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1). In fact, the district court considered Washington’s

criminal history “clearly undercredited” by his criminal history score but nevertheless

declined to increase his sentence in light of the lengthy prison term remaining for his

original offense.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-43-01-SM

Michael R. Croteau

O R D E R

Defendant Croteau’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 22). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 

2006 trial period. Defendant Croteau shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than October 28, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: December 19, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.

Jury Selection: January 4, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00043-SM Document 23 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 20, 2005

cc: Stephen Jeffco, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00043-SM Document 23 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2
IB

Union Calendar No. 36

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727

[Report No. 107–65]

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for consistent treatment

of survivor benefits for public safety officers killed in the line of duty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

MAY 15, 2001

Additional sponsors: Mr. WELLER, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. FOLEY,

Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. HAYWORTH,

Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. SUNUNU,

Mr. STARK, Mr. SHAW, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. ENGLISH, and Mr. CRANE

MAY 15, 2001

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for

consistent treatment of survivor benefits for public safety

officers killed in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1727 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Hero Survivor

3 Benefit Fairness Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF SURVIVOR BENEFITS

5 FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED IN

6 THE LINE OF DUTY.

7 Subsection (b) of section 1528 of the Taxpayer Relief

8 Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–34) is amended by striking

9 the period and inserting ‘‘, and to amounts received after

10 the date of the enactment of the Fallen Hero Survivor

11 Benefit Fairness Act of 2001 with respect to individuals

12 dying on or before December 31, 1996.’’.

13 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

14 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Hero Survivor

15 Benefit Fairness Act of 2001’’.

16 SEC. 2. CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF SURVIVOR BENEFITS

17 FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED IN

18 THE LINE OF DUTY.

19 Subsection (b) of section 1528 of the Taxpayer Relief

20 Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–34) is amended by striking

21 the period and inserting ‘‘, and to amounts received in tax22 able years beginning after December 31, 2001, with respect

23 to individuals dying on or before December 31, 1996.’’.

Union Calendar No. 36

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727

[Report No. 107–65]

A BILL

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for consistent treatment of survivor benefits

for public safety officers killed in the line of duty.

MAY 15, 2001

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,

and ordered to be printed
UNITED DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

AMY PHILBRICK, LLC . ,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No: 06-cv-256

v.

SN NIOBE, Official No. ME5800S,

her engines, machinery, equipment,

masts, etc., in rem ; and

The Estate of Stephen Woods,

State of New Hampshire, and Deborah

Woods in personam,

Defendants.

ORDER OF NOTICE

This action being an admiralty claim within the provisions of Rule 9(h) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule C of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, in the event that the SN

NIOBE, Official No. ME5800S, is not released within ten (10) days after execution of

process:

1 . It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff cause to be published within twenty

(20) days after execution of process in the Manchester Union Leader the Notice or Notices

(as applicable) attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein .

2. It is further ORDERED, pursuant to 46 U .S.C. Section 31325, that Notice of this

suit be provided (1) to the master or individual in charge of the SN NIOBE, Official No .

ME5800S, or to the owner; and (2) to any person, firm, or corporation that has recorded a

mortgage pursuant to 46 U .S.C. Section 31321 or who has filed a Notice of Lien as of the

Case 1:06-cv-00254-JD Document 10 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
date of this Order of any undischarged lien, by mailing by certified mail, return receipt

requested, a copy of the within Notice or Notices (as applicable), such mailing to be made

within (10) days after execution of process .

DATED at Concord, New Hampshire, this day of 12006 .

Judge, United States District Court

2

17th July /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Case 1:06-cv-00254-JD Document 10 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Monty A. Houdeshell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James E. RiesenbachJames E. RiesenbachChief Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2008/s/ Monty A. HoudeshellMonty A. HoudeshellExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.