alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1
             SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                 RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
          HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-HI2 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the "Servicer")  pursuant to the Servicing  Agreement,  dated as of
May 25, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the "Agreement"),  among Residential
Funding  Company,  LLC (formerly  Residential  Funding  Corporation),  as master
servicer,  JPMorgan Chase Bank,  N.A., as indenture  trustee,  and the Home Loan
Trust 2006-HI2, as the issuing entity, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such  period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      -------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, February 7-11, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rateVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 713,728 24,977 129,504 320,116 187,061 16,867 14Number of loans 15,337 397 2,125 7,630 3,658 708 2Weighted average maturity (months)1 19.54 13.45 16.89 18.90 21.86 12.84 3.8

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.45 4.27 4.56 3.70 5.28 .92 1.6

Weighted average risk rating3 3.06 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate 4 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

 Standard error5 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 25th percentile .01 .01 .00 .01 .01 .01 .0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other livestock .01 .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 n.a Other current operating expenses7 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

 Farm machinery and equipment .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Farm real estate .01 n.a. .01 .01 .01 n.a. n.a Other8 .01 .00 .00 .01 .01 .01 n.a

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 83.57 55.71 70.29 85.77 92.25 94.16 83.4 Under commitment 83.06 92.31 86.85 77.85 88.15 92.68 83.4 Callable 25.23 42.92 43.61 26.26 7.19 3.30 4.4 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.31 22.52 14.77 7.73 8.91 1.91 6.8 Other livestock 7.13 8.90 11.46 7.12 5.09 5.96 n.a Other current operating expenses7 55.58 52.16 43.43 60.38 57.48 70.51 6.6

 Farm machinery and equipment 3.54 1.89 2.87 3.76 1.60 5.18 86.4 Farm real estate 7.33 n.a. 5.85 4.57 9.33 n.a. n.a Other8 17.09 14.54 21.62 16.45 17.58 16.44 n.a

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 11.09 9.81 7.12 11.45 9.30 3.34 n.a Other 83.01 77.78 84.52 84.56 83.03 96.66 95.5 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 11

                 TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                (Unaudited)
                 (in thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                       ---------------------------------------
                                                       MARCH 31, 2000          MARCH 31, 1999
                                                       ---------------         ---------------
<S>                                                    <C>                     <C>
Net income (loss)                                            $(3,251)               $(3,957)
                                                       ===============         ===============

                                                        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC

Weighted average common shares  - Basic                   12,956,871             12,946,624
                                                       ===============         ===============
Net income (loss) per share - Basic                           $(0.25)                $(0.31)
                                                       ===============         ===============

                                                        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
Shares used in this computation:
  Weighted average common shares  - Basic                 12,956,871             12,946,624
  Dilutive effect of shares under employee
   stock plans                                                     -                      -
                                                       ---------------         ---------------
  Weighted average common shares - Diluted                12,956,871             12,946,624
                                                       ===============         ===============
Net income (loss) per share - Diluted                         $(0.25)                $(0.31)
                                                       ===============         ===============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Probation Form No . 3 5

(1/92)

Report and Order Terminating Probation /

Supervised Release

Prior to Original Expiration Date

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

V .

Edward C. Frazier DOB 4/25/1942

Crim. No. 05-16-O1-M

On June 27, 2005, the above-named individual was placed on supervised release for a period

of three years. He has complied with the rules and regulations of supervised release and is no longer

in need of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that Edward C. Frazier be discharged from

supervised release at this time .

Respectfully submitted ,

hy J. Brown

U.S. Probation Officer

ORDER OF THE COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the defendant is discharged from Probation

and that the proceedings in the case be terminated .

Date this _Z~ day of ,20 000 .

Gi~5

even J. McXuliffe

Chief U.S . District Court Judge

Case 1:05-cr-00016-SM Document 22 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 140

To eliminate a limitation with respect to the collection of tolls for use

of the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To eliminate a limitation with respect to the collection of

tolls for use of the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds that—

5 (1) the neighborhoods of Soho, Tribeca, Green6 wich Village, Chinatown, the Lower East Side, and

7 Lower Manhattan in New York County and Bay

8 Ridge, Sunset Park, Boerum Hill, Red Hook, Car9 roll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Brooklyn Heights, and

10 downtown Brooklyn in Kings County, New York,
2

•HR 140 IH

1 have suffered adversely from the significant increase

2 in oversize truck and other commercial vehicular

3 traffic;

4 (2) trucks and commercial vehicles—

5 (A) in order to avoid tolls at other New

6 York and New Jersey crossings, use the

7 Verrazano Narrows Bridge route to enter New

8 York City; and

9 (B) in order to avoid tolls to enter New

10 York City and avoid the high cost of the one

11 way toll on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, use

12 Canal Street and the Holland Tunnel when

13 heading eastbound out of New York City;

14 (3) the increase in truck traffic has resulted in

15 extremely dangerous conditions for pedestrians in

16 the communities referred to in paragraph (1), in17 cluding a high number of fatalities;

18 (4) the resultant increase in oversized commer19 cial vehicles’ diesel particulate matter frequently ex20 ceed Federal clean air standards, diminishing the air

21 quality for residents in such communities;

22 (5) since the use of intelligent transportation

23 systems such as EZ-Pass at the Verrazano Narrows

24 Bridge and all facilities owned by the Triborough

25 Bridge and Tunnel Authority and the Metropolitan
3

•HR 140 IH

1 Transit Authority has been a great success in reduc2 ing congestion, pollution, and waiting time at toll fa3 cilities, it would not adversely impact air pollution

4 by reinstituting the collection of tolls in both direc5 tions on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge; and

6 (6) the Metropolitan Transit Authority bridges

7 and tunnels suffer a loss in revenue of $10,000,000

8 annually and over $100,000,000 over the last 10

9 years since the toll has been one way on the

10 Verrazano Narrows Bridge.

11 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION.

12 Section 325 of the Department of Transportation and

13 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (109 Stat.

14 456) is repealed.

15 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

16 It is the sense of Congress that the Triborough

17 Bridge and Tunnel Authority and the Metropolitan Tran18 sit Authority should implement hi-speed EZ-Pass in the

19 collection of tolls on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge to en20 sure air quality standards are met and to reduce conges21 tion at the Bridge.

Æ
H. R. 1749

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 685 Turnberry

Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ‘‘Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Herbert

H. Bateman Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1079353
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         5906002
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   30245851
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        24658677
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          24677081
<LOANS>                                       43808072
<ALLOWANCE>                                     200000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               107938173
<DEPOSITS>                                    67040922
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1118785
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25921
<OTHER-SE>                                    39752545
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               107938173
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 920453
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               690619
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                262061
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1873133
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              740119
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              803289
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1069844
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    18878
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 666556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 609642
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      609642
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    379369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                200000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    18878
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               200000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            200000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 3 , 2021

NO. 03

- 20

- 00161

- CR

Curtis A. Fenderson , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIA NA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ argum ents, the Court hol ds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction. The refore, the Court aff irm s the trial court ’ s judgment of

conviction

. Becaus e appellant is indi gent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is

mad e.
y 

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 9,451 9,099 9,045 8,971 8,971 8,971 8,971 8,971 8,971 8,971 8,971 

Note. The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S. 2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury 

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s web securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value. 

site at: www. federalreserve.gov/releases. 3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not 

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional included in the gold stock of the United States. organizations.
Exhibit 32(b)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

The undersigned, Paul M. Keglevic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (the
Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 2nd day of August, 2010.



/s/ PAUL M. KEGLEVICName:

Paul M. KeglevicTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Energy Future Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 2021


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: March 23, 2022
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7077

ROLANDO GUERRA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-98-1150-4-19BE) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rolando Guerra, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rolondo Guerra seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Guerra v. South Carolina , No. CA-98-1150-4-19BE (D.S.C. July 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1709

For the relief of Adela T. and Darryl Bailor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Ms. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Adela T. and Darryl Bailor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

4 In consideration of—

5 (1) the inability of Adela T. and Darryl Bailor

6 to receive compensation under the Tort Claims Pro7 cedure described in chapter 171 of title 28, United

8 States Code;

9 (2) the moral responsibility of the United

10 States to protect the right of its law-abiding citizens

11 to be free from attacks by violent felons in the cus12 tody of the United States; and
2

•HR 1709 IH

1 (3) the recommendation of the United States

2 Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in the case enti3 tled Adela T. Bailor and Darryl Bailor v. the Salva4 tion Army and the United States of America, No.

5 94–2660, that Adela T. and Darryl Bailor seek pri6 vate legislative relief,

7 the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, not later than

8 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act,

9 out of funds not otherwise appropriated, to Adela T. and

10 Darryl Bailor of Colorado Springs, Colorado, the amount

11 determined by the Attorney General under section 2(b),

12 as full compensation for the injuries Adela T. Bailor suf13 fered as a result of a brutal rape and beating on May 9,

14 1991, by an inmate of the Federal correctional system in

15 the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

16 SEC. 2. AMOUNT.

17 (a) TRANSMITTAL OF CLAIMS.—Not later than 6

18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, Adela

19 T. and Darryl Bailor, or their representatives, shall trans20 mit to the Attorney General all claims for compensation

21 for the injuries referred to in section 1.

22 (b) DETERMINATION OF THE ATTORNEY GEN23 ERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act, with appropriate consideration given to

25 the claims transmitted under subsection (a), the Attorney
3

•HR 1709 IH

1 General shall determine the amount that the United

2 States owes, using Indiana tort law, to Adela T. and

3 Darryl Bailor for the injuries referred to in section 1.

Æ
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2009


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: October 1, 2009
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:07-cv-00053-PB   Document 9   Filed 08/15/07   Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00053-PB   Document 9   Filed 08/15/07   Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00053-PB   Document 9   Filed 08/15/07   Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00053-PB   Document 9   Filed 08/15/07   Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-00053-PB   Document 9   Filed 08/15/07   Page 5 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-77-01-SM

Johnell Bennett

O R D E R

Defendant Bennett’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 12). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2007

trial period. Defendant Bennett shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than December 11, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: February 27, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. 

Jury Selection: March 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00077-SM Document 13 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 1, 2006

cc: Charles A. Bookman, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00077-SM Document 13 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 2