alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel Childs

V .

Hillsborough County

Case No . 05-fp-43 6

Department of Corrections, et al .

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted .

This case has been assigned number .L -cvSO ORDERED .

it&d States Distric t

Date :at l 1 120D L

cc : Daniel Childs

Case 1:05-cv-00436-JD Document 4 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 1
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as special servicerunder the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactionslisted on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to anylimitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2019 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 20, 2020

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSC 2019-L2

Morgan Stanley Capital I TrustMSC 2019-L2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series MSC 2019-L2

(Fidelis Portfolio – underBBCMS 2018-C2)

  

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, NY 10036

Jane Lam

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1633 Broadway, 29thFloor

New York, NY 10019

Legal Compliance

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

ATTN:  MSC 2019-L2

Columbia MD 21045 1951

Corporate Trust (CMBS) BondGroup

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSC 2019-L2

Morgan Stanley Capital I TrustMSC 2019-L2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series MSC 2019-L2

(Sheraton Grand NashvilleDowntown – under WFCM 2018-C48)

  

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, NY 10036

Jane Lam

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1633 Broadway, 29thFloor

New York, NY 10019

Legal Compliance

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

ATTN:  MSC 2019-L2

Columbia MD 21045 1951

Corporate Trust (CMBS) BondGroup

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1754

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that ancestors

and lineal descendants of past or present members of the Armed Forces

shall be taken into account in determining whether a veterans’ organization is exempt from tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mr. HOUGHTON (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr.

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. OXLEY, and Mr. MCHUGH) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that ancestors and lineal descendants of past or present

members of the Armed Forces shall be taken into account in determining whether a veterans’ organization

is exempt from tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEMBERSHIP REQUIRE4 MENT FOR EXEMPTION FROM TAX FOR VET5 ERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

7 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

•HR 1754 IH

1 to list of exempt organizations) is amended by striking ‘‘or

2 widowers’’ and inserting ‘‘, widowers, or ancestors or lineal

3 descendants’’.

4 (b) MODIFICATION NOT TO APPLY IN DETERMINING

5 UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME.—Paragraph

6 (4) of section 512(a) of such Code is amended by striking

7 ‘‘members of such organization or their dependents’’ and

8 inserting ‘‘members of such organization who are past or

9 present members of the Armed Forces of the United

10 States or who are dependents of such past or present

11 members’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

14 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Carey,

Plaintiff

v. 06-cv-303-SM

Daniel St. Hilaire, et al. ,

Defendants

O R D E R

The plaintiff having failed to comply with the Order of Judge Joseph A. DiClerico dated August

22, 2006, and pay the initial sum of $5.33 towards the filing fee by September 23, 2006, the complaint

is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

October 5, 2006 

________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: William Carey, Pro Se 

Case 1:06-cv-00303-SM Document 8 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Olga L. Bogdanov, Chapter 7 Trustee

of Amherst Technologies , LLC, et al.,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No.

B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.,

Defendant

1:07-mc-12-PB

ORDER

In accordance with the Report Regarding Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

Law issued by Bankruptcy Judge J. Michael Deasy on January 9, 2007, the Plaintiff's Motion for

Default Judgment is granted. Default judgment shall be entered against the Defendant.

SO ORDERED.

Date : 26 February 2007

cc: Olga L. Bogdanov, Esq.

Daniel W. Sklar, Esq.

B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.

US Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk

Geraldine L. Karonis, Esq.

/s/ Paul J. Barbadoro

United States District Judge

Case 1:07-mc-00012-PB Document 3 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00286-JD Document 73-4 Filed 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:06-cv-00286-JD Document 73-4 Filed 09/25/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:06-cv-00286-JD Document 73-4 Filed 09/25/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:06-cv-00286-JD Document 73-4 Filed 09/25/2008 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

------------------------------------------------------------X 

ROSEMARY A. GILROY, 

Plaintiff 

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 

VS. 07-CV300-JL 

JAMES KASPER, TRUSTEE, PONEMAH TUST 

ALAN SEGAL and KURT McHUGH 

Defendants 

------------------------------------------------------------X 

DEFENDANTS JAMES KASPER, TRUSTEE, PONEMAH TRUST, ALAN 

SEGAL AND KURT McHUGH’S MOTION TO CONTINUE 

THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

 Now comes the Defendants in the above-entitled matter and hereby moves this 

Honorable Court to continue the date set for the pre-trial conference. As reason 

therefore, the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Complaint in 

accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted. In the interest of judicial economy, a pre-trial conference should not occur 

until after the hearing and final order of the Court on said motion. 

WHEREFORE, the Defendants respectfully request that the within Motion to 

Continue the Pre-Trial Conference be allowed, and grant further relief as is just. 

Respectfully Submitted Respectfully Submitted 

By Pro Se Defendant, By Pro Se Defendant, 

__/s/ Alan H. Segal________ __/s/ Kurt R. McHugh_________ 

Alan H. Segal, Esq. Kurt R. McHugh, Esq. 

Law Office of Alan H. Segal Law Office of Alan H. Segal 

175 Highland Ave. 175 Highland Ave. 

Needham, MA 02494 Needham, MA 02494 

MA BBO # 450580 MA BBO # 654835 

781-444-9676 781-444-9676 

___________ ___________ 

Date Date 

Case 1:07-cv-00300-JL Document 23 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully Submitted 

James Kasper, Trustee of the Ponemah Trust 

By His Attorneys 

COAKLEY & HYDE, PLLC 

/s/ Steven F. Hyde, Esq. Date: 31-MAR-08 

Steven F. Hyde, Esq. 

154 Maplewood Ave. 

Post Office Box 6590 

Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03802 

Bar #15147 

Ph: 603-319-1731 

Fax: 603-319-1727 

e-Mail: attorneyhyde@comcast.net 

Case 1:07-cv-00300-JL Document 23 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mark R. Mandeville

V .

Merrimack County Department of Corrections,

Superintendent, et al.

Civil No. 05-cv-92-JD

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41 .1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed as to the claims that were settled by the

parties on July 1, 2008, those claims are herewith dismissed with prejudice .

SO ORDERED.

August 5, 2008 /s/JosephA. DiClerico. Jr.

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judg e

cc: Michael Sheehan, Esq.

John Curran, Esq.

Elizabeth Hurley, Esq.

Ralph Suozzo, Esq.

W. Kirk Abbott, Jr.

Charles Bauer, Esq .

Daniel Mullen, Esq.

Lisa Lee, Esq .

Case 1:05-cv-00092-JD Document 118 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22363]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending September 12, 2008

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0285.
    Date Filed: September 12, 2008.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: October 3, 2008.
    Description: Application of Sovereign Air, Inc. requesting 
authority to operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air 
carrier.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E8-22363 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50757

consolidated with

No. 20-50775

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Melquiades Galvez-Martinez, 

Defendant- Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-13-1

USDC No. 4:19-CR-56-1

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 25, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50757 Document: 00515756943 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2021
No. 20-50757

c/w No. 20-50775

2

Per Curiam:*

Melquiades Galvez-Martinez appeals his within-guidelines sentence 

imposed following his guilty plea for illegal reentry after removal from the 

United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also appeals the 

concomitant revocation of his supervised release related to his prior 

conviction for transportation of illegal aliens for private financial gain, in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (B)(i). 

Raising one issue on appeal, Galvez-Martinez argues that his illegal 

reentry sentence, imposed under § 1326(b)(2), violates his due process rights 

by exceeding the two-year statutory maximum set forth in § 1326(a) because 

the indictment did not allege a prior conviction necessary for the § 1326(b)(2) 

enhancement. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226–27 (1998), but seeks to preserve 

the issue for further review. The Government filed an unopposed motion for 

summary affirmance agreeing that the issue is foreclosed and, in the 

alternative, a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

As the Government argues, and Galvez-Martinez concedes, the sole 

issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. See United States 

v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625–26 (5th Cir. 2007). Summary affirmance is 

therefore appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 

1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

Although the appeals of Galvez-Martinez’s illegal reentry conviction 

and supervised release revocation were consolidated, he does not address the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 20-50757 Document: 00515756943 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2021
No. 20-50757

c/w No. 20-50775

3

revocation in his appellate brief. Consequently, he has abandoned any 

challenge to the revocation or revocation sentence. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 

F.2d 222, 224–25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED. 

The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief 

is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case: 20-50757 Document: 00515756943 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/25/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                    320
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       18,450
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         18,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   8,450
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                               10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           18,450
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                 1,129,487
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,590,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,536
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,998,494
<PP&E>                                       1,061,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                 506,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,370,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,129,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                        12,605
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,713,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,370,860
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,197,382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,247,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                950,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                   354,136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   595,994
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.047
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.047


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 15






TXU Corp.:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries (TXU
Corp.) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, as indicated
in our report dated May 7, 2004; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Corp.'s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-37652, 333-64504,
333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01, 333-71004-02, 333-84418,
333-84418-01, 333-84418-02, 333-110125 and Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-103922,
and 333-115159 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-32833,
333-32837, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-62014, 333-86640, 333-92260 and 333-105133 on Form
S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 7, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10654 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Luis Avina-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:01-CR-1-1-C

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Gonzalez-Rodriguez appeals the 57-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gonzalez-Rodriguez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment.No. 01-10654 -2- Gonzalez-Rodriguez notes that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which recited only facts and elements supporting a charge of simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. Gonzalez-Rodriguez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). GonzalezRodriguez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. In lieu of filing an appellee’s brief, the Government has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. However, in light of our decision to affirm the district court’s judgment, the Government need not file an appellee’s brief.
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 112 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 112

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-229 is 
amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and inserting 
in lieu thereof ``October 11, 2002''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 112

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2022


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: January 13, 2023
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------