alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Andrew Benson, certify that:

 

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DataMEG Corp., for theyear ended December 31, 2004;

 

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

 

4.     I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and I have:

 

a)        designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)        evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

c)        disclosed in this annual report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to material affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting;

 

5.     I havedisclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

 

a)        all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)        any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  April 15, 2005.               |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                      |
| /s/  Andrew Benson                   |   |
| By:  Andrew Benson                        |
| Chairman  and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 146 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.146

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
    feasibility of designating the Great Falls Historic District in 
  Paterson, New Jersey, as a unit of the National Park System, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Falls Historic District Study 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING GREAT FALLS HISTORIC 
              DISTRICT, PATERSON, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
        (1) Great falls historic district.--The term ``Great Falls 
    Historic District'' means the Great Falls Historic District in the 
    city of Paterson, New Jersey, established as an historic district 
    by section 510 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act 
    of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4158; 16 U.S.C. 461 note).
        (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park 
    Service.
    (b) Study.--As soon as practicable after funds are made available 
to carry out this section, the Secretary shall commence a study 
regarding the suitability and feasibility of further recognizing the 
historic and cultural significance of the lands and structures of the 
Great Falls Historic District through the designation of the Great 
Falls Historic District as a unit of the National Park System.
    (c) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the study required by this 
section.
    (d) Submission.--The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy 
and Natural Resources of the Senate a report describing the results of 
the study.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), we, Jeffrey H. Coats, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Curtis E. DeWalt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Jeffrey H. CoatsJeffrey H. CoatsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJuly 24, 2009
   /s/ Curtis E. DeWaltCurtis E. DeWaltSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerJuly 24, 2009
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Noe ALONZO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-10462.

D.C. No. CR-02-00005-KJD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 18, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Noe AIonzo-Hernandez appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry of deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. AIonzo-Hernandez contends that under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court deprived him of due process by imposing a sentence greater than 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)’s two-year maximum based on his prior aggravated felony, where he did not admit to having committed a prior criminal offense which would qualify as a felony.

AIonzo-Hernandez states that he presents the issue merely to preserve it in the event of ensuing favorable Supreme Court precedent, and acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his/her knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/S/      WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
--------------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
January 14, 2005

/S/      MOMOKO A. BERAN
--------------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
January 14, 2005

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-016-01-JD

Matthew Uhry a/k/a Fatty Matty

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. 

Defendant has pled guilty to a crack cocaine distribution

and faces a 97 month sentence. Despite being given a chance to

remain on bail for exceptional medical circumstances, he has

tested “dirty” on July 11th and July 19th for cocaine use. Given

the failed opportunity to comply with conditions I find that the

defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of

conditions. The conditions of release are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

Case 1:07-cr-00016-JD Document 14 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
2

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 23, 2007 

cc: Robert J. Veiga, Esq.

 Mark E. Howard, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00016-JD Document 14 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed June 18 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00 570

- CV

____________
IN THE MATTER OF R. A.

On Appeal f

rom the County Court at Law No. 3 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07

- CJV

- 013620



### A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

On June 15 , 20 12 , the parties notified this court that the trial court is scheduled to reconsider the order that forms the basis of this appeal. The parties requested abatement of the appeal for the trial court’s reconsideration of the order . The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a clos ed case, and removed from this c ourt’s active

docket until September 1 , 2012 . The appeal will be rei nstated on this c ourt’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The c ourt will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the c ourt may rei nstate the appeal on its own motion.PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and McCally.
DATAMEG CORP. AND QUANTUM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES ENTER NEGOTIATIONS TO SETTLE
LITIGATION


WASHINGTON DC, Nov. 22  -- DataMEG Corp. (OTC BB: DTMG) announced
today that they have entered into negotiations with Quantum Advanced
Technologies to settle the litigation styled Quantum Advanced Technologies,
Inc. v. Phillips et al, Civil Action No. 00ca0001066.

Mr. Andrew Benson, President DataMEG Corp. stated, "We are in serious
negotiations with Quantum Advanced Technologies, Inc. aimed at settling the
intellectual property dispute relating to our CAS technology development. We
have agreed to several key issues surrounding the dispute, and though there
are significant issues remaining, we feel that the parties are working
diligently to get all of the issues resolved and put this matter to rest. We
hope to come to an amicable solution to this litigation in the near future."

Mr. Benson continued, "DataMEG Corp. anticipates that Quantum Advanced
Technologies, Inc. will make a statement regarding these negotiations, which
may be viewed on their Web site: http://www.QuantumAdvancedTechnologies.com .
We all look forward to the termination of this time consuming and inefficient
exercise."

DataMEG Corp., currently headquartered in Washington DC, is an
engineering/technology firm focused on Internet and telecommunications
technology solutions. DataMEG Corp. is developing proprietary technology, its
Communications Acceleration System, (CAS), which allows for the transfer of
information over POTS, DSL and other information transmission networks.

Except for the historical information contained herein, this press release
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that involve a number of risks
and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements may be identified by
reference to a future period by use of forward-looking terminology such as
"expect", "anticipate", "could", "may" and other words of similar nature.
There are certain important factors and risks that could cause results to
differ materially from those anticipated by the statements herein. Such
factors and risks include the successful completion of the CAS technology
development, and the business conditions and growth in related areas of
telecommunications, wireless and digital transmission arenas and in the
economy in general. Competitive factors include the rapid pace of alternative
technology advancements and the Company's ability to gain market acceptance of
its evolving product. Other risks, including the outcome of pending adverse
claims to the Company and it's subsidiary's technology that have been and may
be detailed from time to time in the filings of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Neither DataMEG Corp. or its subsidiary undertake any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 6, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D20-933; 3D20-934

Lower Tribunal Nos. 17-2427; 17-1085

________________

J.G., a Juvenile,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Yery Marrero, 

Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public 

Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-60-PB

Howard Fosher

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the November 1, 2005 

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete plea negotiations and due to a medical condition for

which he continues to be treated. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from November 1, 2005 to December 6, 2005. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00060-PB Document 30 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 27, 2005 final pretrial conference is continue

to November 28, 2005 at 4:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 25, 2005

cc: Adam Bernstein, Esq.

Joseph Caufield, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00060-PB Document 30 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-56-01/02/03/04-SM

Raymond Cole, Roy Warren,

Joshua Benoit and Garret Morin

O R D E R

Defendant Raymond Cole has filed a motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial (document no. 29). Trial has been rescheduled for the

October 2008 trial period. Defendant Cole shall file a waiver of speedy trial

rights not later than July 7, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, the continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: September 26, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: October 7, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00056-SM Document 32 Filed 06/23/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 23, 2008 

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq. 

Charles Keefe, Esq.

Paul Twomey, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00056-SM Document 32 Filed 06/23/08 Page 2 of 2
August
22, 2019


 


Michael
Shevack


2310
Byrecroft Road


New
Hope, PA 18938


 


Removal
from Advisory Board


 


Mr.
Shevack:


 


Due
to lack of mutually beneficial business interests, 2050 Motors, Inc. hereby removes you from its Advisory Board effective immediately.
Ten (10) million common stock purchase warrants issued April 12, 2019 to you are hereby canceled.


 


Thank
you,


 


 


 


Vikram
Grover


CEO


2050
Motors, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,899
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,504
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          38,911
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,222
<LOANS>                                        861,127
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,020,876
<DEPOSITS>                                     726,197
<SHORT-TERM>                                    64,695
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,269
<LONG-TERM>                                     86,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,020,876
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,319
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,530
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   154
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,003
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,575
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,601
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,402
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,955
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,955
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.04
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,554
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,462
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,788
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       53
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,746
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,746
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,095
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1868 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1868

 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 
            certain counties flexibility in spending funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2001

Mr. Engel (for himself, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Crowley, Mrs. Maloney of New 
York, Mr. Rangel, and Mr. Serrano) introduced the following bill; which 
      was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 
            certain counties flexibility in spending funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPENDING FLEXIBILITY.

    Section 1124(c)(2) is amended by striking the third and fourth 
sentences.
                                 <all>
```