alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lonnie Gene Kinnett v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 0 1128

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 7

- CR

- 0916

Trial court: 2 12 th District Court of G a lveston County

This Court’s July 23, 2019 Order of Abatement had abated and remanded this case

to the trial court to conduct a late

- brief hearing to determine whether counsel Susan C. Norman and Holly Gail Crampton intended to continue to represent appellant or whether they have abandoned the appeal. On August 8, 2019, the supplemental clerk’s record was

filed in thi s Court. This record attached the trial court’s August 8, 2019 abatement order hearing findings and recommendations finding that, among other things, Susan C. Norman and Holly Gail Crampton have not abandoned this appeal, have begun work on the brief,

and intend to file the brief by August 20, 2019, and recommends that this case be reinstated. On August 13, 2019, the supplemental reporter’s record was filed of the abatement hearing.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte directs the Clerk of this Court to REI NSTATE

this case on the Court’s active docket . Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed by August 20, 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 2, 38.6( a ) (1)

. The State’s brief , if any, is
ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of the filing of appellant’s brief

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED

. Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court
Date: __ August 20, 2019

_
#### Jesus MEJIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Khurshid Z. YUSUFF, RespondentAppellee.

No. 02-60947.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 19, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Jesus Mejia, a federal prisoner (# 66947-079), appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

In 1995, the district court for the Northern District of Florida imposed upon Mejia consecutive prison terms of 210 months and 60 months for his jury-trial convictions of conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of a firearm during a drug-trafficking offense. Mejia has argued that, although the conspiracy count charged him with conspiring to violate 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), which applies to marijuana quantities exceeding 1,000 kilograms, he was in fact convicted under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). He has thus contended that he was “actually innocent” of the conspiracy offense as charged.

The district court did not err in dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Mejia acknowledges that a collateral challenge to a conviction should ordinarily be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Mejia’s substantive contention does not satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255’s “savings clause,” so as to enable him to proceed instead under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He has demonstrated neither that he was convicted of conduct that did not constitute a crime nor that his claims were foreclosed by circuit law at the time of his conviction or appeal. *See Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir.2001); *Jeffers v. Chandler,*253 F.3d 827, 830-31 (5th Cir.2001).

Mejia’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-74-01-PB

Robert Faiella

O R D E R

The judgment dated July 2, 2007 is hereby amended to reflect a Special Assessment of

$300.00. The defendant has already paid $100.00 as originally ordered, leaving a balance of

$200.00 which is due immediately.

SO ORDERED.

July 5, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Terry P. Segal, Esq.

William E. Morse, Esq.

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00074-PB Document 15 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-132-PB

Scott Annis

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for December 2, 2008, citing the need for

additional time to finalize a plea agreement or prepare for

trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 2, 2008 to January 6, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 23 Filed 11/24/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on December

19, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 24, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 23 Filed 11/24/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-134-02-SM

Raymond Jackson

O R D E R

Defendant Jackson’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 36). Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2007

trial period. Defendant Jackson shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than April 25, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: June 1, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00134-SM Document 38 Filed 04/18/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

April 17, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00134-SM Document 38 Filed 04/18/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Ledger

 v. Civil No. 06-cv-411-JL

LeVierge et al

O R D E R

I recuse myself from this case and direct the clerk to

assign the matter to another judge.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Joseph N. LaPlante 

Joseph N. LaPlante

United States District Judge

January 28, 2008

cc: Michael Sheehan, Esq.

 Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq.

 John A. Curran, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00411-SM Document 25 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1

WRITTEN CERTIFICATION of
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of EFJ, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to the best of each
of their knowledge:



| |  | By: | /s/MICHAEL E. JALBERTMichael E. Jalbert
Chief Executive Officer
May 02, 2003
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: | /s/MASSOUD SAFAVIMassoud Safavi
Chief Financial Officer
May 02, 2003        

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been
provided to EFJ, Inc. and such statement will be retained by EFJ, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Safety and Occupational Health Study Section (SOHSS), National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meetings for the 
aforementioned committee:

    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., October 14, 2008 (Closed). 8 
a.m.-5 p.m., October 15, 2008 (Closed).
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, 
Virginia 22314, Telephone (703) 684-5900, Fax (703)684-1403.
    Status: This meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
pursuant to Section 10(d) Public Law 92-463.
    Purpose: The Safety and Occupational Health Study Section will 
review, discuss, and evaluate grant application(s) received in 
response to the Institute's standard grants review and funding 
cycles pertaining to research issues in occupational safety and 
health, and allied areas.
    It is the intent of NIOSH to support broad-based research 
endeavors in keeping with the Institute's program goals. This will 
lead to improved understanding and appreciation for the magnitude of 
the aggregate health burden associated with occupational injuries 
and illnesses, as well as to support more focused research projects, 
which will lead to improvements in the delivery of occupational 
safety and health services, and the prevention of work-related 
injury and illness. It is anticipated that research funded will 
promote these program goals.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will convene to address 
matters related to the conduct of study section business and for the 
study section to consider safety and occupational health-related 
grant applications.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Price Connor, Ph.D., NIOSH 
Health Scientist, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-20, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, Telephone (404)498-2511, Fax (404)498-2571.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-22344 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Graham

v.

NH State Prison, Warden, et al.

Civil No. 06-cv-453-JD

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 16, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

June 11, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: William Graham, pro se

Laura Lombardi, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00453-JD Document 30 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gregg Blackstock

v. Civil No. 04-cv-305-SM

NH State Prison, Warden

ORDER and

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner was ordered to exhaust state remedies and to

advise the court of the status of his state case every ninety

(90) days. He has failed to provide any status report since May

24, 2005. The stay is lifted and I recommend dismissal of the

petition for inclusion of unexhausted claims.

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within fourteen (14) days of receipt of this notice. 

Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the

right to appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized

Practice of Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir.

1992); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.

1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 2, 2009

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

 Laura E.B. Lombardi, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00305-SM Document 20 Filed 12/02/09 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT** 

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,2018 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2019-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2021 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2021.

 

6.            INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2022. 

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of Manchester  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Barry R. Steinberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:   June 10, 2005                                /S/ Barry R. Steinberg
                                                        --------------------
                                                     Barry R. Steinberg
                                                     Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1604 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1604

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the floor for 
  treatment as an extremely low DSH State to 3 percent in fiscal year 
                                 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

  Mr. Barrett (for himself and Mrs. Wilson) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the floor for 
  treatment as an extremely low DSH State to 3 percent in fiscal year 
                                 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid Safety Net Improvement Act 
of 2001''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN FLOOR FOR TREATMENT AS AN EXTREMELY LOW DSH STATE 
              TO 3 PERCENT IN FISCAL YEAR 2002.

    (a) Increase in DSH Floor.--Section 1923(f)(5) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-4(f)(5)), as added by section 701(a)(2) 
of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and 
Protection Act of 2000 (as enacted into law by section 1(a)(6) of 
Public Law 106-554), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``fiscal year 1999'' and inserting ``fiscal 
        year 2000'';
            (2) by striking ``August 31, 2000'' and inserting ``August 
        31, 2001'';
            (3) by striking ``1 percent'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``3 percent''; and
            (4) by striking ``fiscal year 2001'' and inserting ``fiscal 
        year 2002''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on October 1, 2001, and apply to DSH allotments under title XIX 
of the Social Security Act for fiscal year 2002 and each fiscal year 
thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6177

JAMES FOUNTAIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM BELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-836-5-HC-F-3)

Submitted: March 31, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Fountain, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Fountain appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing as

untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 2 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 3 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 4 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 5 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 6 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 7 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 8 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 9 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 10 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 11 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 12 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 13 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 14 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 15 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 16 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 17 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 18 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 19 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 20 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 21 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 22 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 23 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 24 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 25 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 26 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 27 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 28 of 29
Case 1:05-cv-00120-PB Document 1-1 Filed 04/05/05 Page 29 of 29
img191162366_0.jpg











Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”)



Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2018-C6



Pursuant to Section 3.01 (37) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), as an authorized officer of Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC (“Berkadia”), I hereby attest that:



i. A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the (reporting period) period has been made under my supervision.




ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the period and no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.




Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC,

img191162366_1.jpg



Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2024











Inv. 888 Lib. A




---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-80-02-SM

Jeffrey Mealey

O R D E R

Defendant Mealey's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 40)

is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2008 trial period. Defendant shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 16, 2008. On the filing of such

waivers, the continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 41 Filed 05/12/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: July 30, 2008 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection: August 5, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 12, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

 William Christie, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 41 Filed 05/12/08 Page 2 of 2