alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1422 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1422

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to provide, in the case of an employee welfare benefit plan providing 
benefits in the event of disability, an exemption from preemption under 
 such title for State tort actions to recover damages arising from the 
          failure of the plan to timely provide such benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to provide, in the case of an employee welfare benefit plan providing 
benefits in the event of disability, an exemption from preemption under 
 such title for State tort actions to recover damages arising from the 
          failure of the plan to timely provide such benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. EXEMPTION FROM ERISA PREEMPTION FOR STATE CAUSES OF ACTION 
              IN TORT TO RECOVER DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE FAILURE OF A 
              PLAN PROVIDING BENEFITS IN THE EVENT OF DISABILITY TO 
              TIMELY PROVIDE SUCH BENEFITS.

    Section 514(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (9) as paragraph (10); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(9) Subsection (a) shall not be construed to preclude, in the 
case of an employee welfare benefit plan providing benefits in the 
event of disability, any cause of action in tort under State law to 
recover damages arising from the failure of such plan to timely provide 
such benefits.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
failures occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-165-PB

Anthony Frith

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the June 5, 2007 trial

in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete outstanding discovery and prepare a defense. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to July 10, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00165-PB Document 28 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 22, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

June 25, 2007 at 4:15 p.m.

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 22, 2007

cc: Richard Foley, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00165-PB Document 28 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES –OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report.

 

 
|   | **/S/ Jana Ahlfinger Bell** |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Jana Ahlfinger Bell         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |

 

**August 6,2009**

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-24-PB

Cathy Smedes

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the August 16, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete discovery and prepare a defense. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from August 16, 2005 to November 1, 2005. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00024-PB Document 7 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 2, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued to

October 17, 2005 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 28, 2005

cc: William Christie, Esq.

Robert Veiga, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00024-PB Document 7 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 2
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 

10, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00955-CR

____________

IN RE LEONARDO M. LOZANO, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

228th District Court

Harris, County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1277258

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On November 2, 2011, relator Leonardo M. Lozano filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. 

In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Marc Carter, presiding judge 

of the 228th District Court in Harris County, to let him have his day in court on 12/05/11 or

release him from custody. 
2

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show that he has no adequate 

remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, 

not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial 

Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. 

proceeding). Consideration of a request or motion that is properly filed and before the 

court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. 

App.1987) (orig. proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had a legal duty 

to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to do so. In re 

Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). A relator must 

show that the trial court received, was aware of, and asked to rule on the motion. In re 

Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding). 

In his petition for writ of mandamus, relator alleged he has been incarcerated for 

more than a year without a trial and his right to a speedy trial has been violated. 

According to relator, he has appointed counsel and trial has been set for December 5, 2011.

Relator attached no record to his petition for writ of mandamus evidencing a 

pending motion before the court on which the trial court has failed to rule. Further, to the 

degree relator seeks release from custody, relator is seeking pretrial habeas corpus relief 

over which this court does not have jurisdiction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 

S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding).

Absent a showing the trial court is aware of and been asked to rule on relator’s 

request, relator has not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of 

mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           11,279,129
<SECURITIES>                      6,403,812
<RECEIVABLES>                     7,642,041
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                       6,145,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 32,407,438
<PP&E>                            2,440,666
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,414,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   33,590,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,574,908
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             93,692
<OTHER-SE>                       28,921,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     33,590,117
<SALES>                          21,929,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 21,929,929
<CGS>                             9,104,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    17,321,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   5,277,234
<INCOME-TAX>                      1,443,203
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               3,834,031
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      3,834,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .40

        

</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1745

To provide that all American citizens living abroad shall (for purposes of

the apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several

States and for other purposes) be included in future decennial censuses

of population, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide that all American citizens living abroad shall

(for purposes of the apportionment of Representatives

in Congress among the several States and for other

purposes) be included in future decennial censuses of

population, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Full Equality for

5 Americans Abroad Act’’.
2

•HR 1745 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF AMERICAN CITIZENS LIVING

2 ABROAD IN FUTURE DECENNIAL CENSUSES.

3 The Secretary of Commerce shall ensure that, in each

4 decennial census of population taken after the date of the

5 enactment of this Act under title 13, United States Code,

6 all American citizens living abroad shall be included for

7 purposes of the tabulations required for the apportionment

8 of Representatives in Congress among the several States,

9 and for other purposes.

10 SEC. 3. REPORT ON RELATED ISSUES.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is hereby enacted into law

12 the provision described in subsection (b) (relating to the

13 report to be submitted by the Secretary of Commerce to

14 the Congress by no later than September 30, 2001).

15 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The provision described in this

16 subsection is the paragraph beginning on page 256 and

17 ending on page 257 of the explanatory language on H.R.

18 5548 (as introduced on October 25, 2000), as included

19 in the joint explanatory statement of the committee of con20 ference accompanying the conference report on H.R. 4942

21 (House Report Numbered 106–1005, 106th Congress, 2d

22 Session, October 26, 2000, 256–257), but deeming such

23 paragraph not to include ‘‘and their dependents’’.

Æ
|                                         |   | State of   |                     | Percentage of Voting Securities |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   | Incorporation   |      | Owned By Registrant                  |   |
| Value      Line Publishing, Inc.             |   | New      York   |                     |                                           | 100    | % |
|                                         |   |            |                     |                                           |   |   |
| Compupower      Corporation                  |   | Delaware        |                     |                                           | 100    | % |
|                                         |   |            |                     |                                           |   |   |
| EULAV      Securities, Inc.                  |   | New      York   |                     |                                           | 100    | % |
|                                         |   |            |                     |                                           |   |   |
| The      Vanderbilt Advertising Agency, Inc. |   | New      York   |                     |                                           | 100    | % |
|                                         |   |            |                     |                                           |   |   |
| Value      Line Distribution Center, Inc.    |   | New      Jersey |                     |                                           | 100    | % |
|                                         |   |            |                     |                                           |   |   |
| EULAV      Asset Management, LLC             |   | Delaware        |                     |                                           | 100    | % |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - Order No. 1570

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas*, the South Carolina State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 38, has requested authority under Section 400.28 (a)(2) of the Board's regulations on behalf of Kittel Supplier USA, Inc., to assemble automotive roof/luggage racks under FTZ procedures within FTZ 38 Site 3, Duncan, South Carolina (FTZ Docket 4-2008, filed 1-28-2008);                

*Whereas*, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 7250, 2-7-2008);                

*Whereas*, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore*, the Board hereby grants authority for the assembly of automotive roof/luggage racks within FTZ 38 for Kittel Supplier USA, Inc., as described in the application and                     **Federal Register**                     notice, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of September 2008.

David M. Spooner,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce,for Import Administration,Alternate Chairman,Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22461 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

William L . Twining and

Shirley Bruce

Case No . 07-cr-217-01/02-SM

ORDER

Defendant Twining's motion to continue the final pretrial conference an d

trial is granted (document 16) . Trial has been rescheduled for the February

2008 trial period. Defendant Twining shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than December 3, 2007 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : January 30, 2008 at 4 :00 p .m.

Jury Selection : February 5, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00217-SM Document 17 Filed 11/26/07 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

/s/ Steven J . McAuliffe

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

November 26, 2007

cc : Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:07-cr-00217-SM Document 17 Filed 11/26/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11.1

EFJ, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

(Unaudited and in thousands, except share and per share data)



|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ----------
|                                                     |  | Three Months Ended March 31,
|                                                     |  | 2006                         |            |   | 2005
|Net income (loss)                                    |  | $                            | (3,101     | ) |      | $ | 5,243     
|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Net income (loss) per share  Basic:                 |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Weighted average common shares  Basic               |  |                              | 25,710,713 |   |      |   | 18,313,043
|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Net income (loss) per share  Basic                  |  | $                            | (0.12      | ) |      | $ | 0.29      
|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Net income (loss) per share  Diluted:               |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Shares used in this computation:                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Weighted average common shares  Basic               |  |                              | 25,710,713 |   |      |   | 18,313,043
|Dilutive effect of shares under employee stock plans |  |                              |           |   |      |   | 458,203   
|Weighted average restricted shares granted           |  |                              |           |   |      |   |          
|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Weighted average common shares  Diluted             |  |                              | 25,710,713 |   |      |   | 18,771,246
|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |           
|Net income (loss) per share  Diluted                |  | $                            | (0.12      | ) |      | $ | 0.28      
|                                                     |  |                              |            |   |      |   |
| (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 15, 2009 | /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge                   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                     | Paul      Van Ostenbridge                  |
|                     | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |                                       |
|                     |                                       |
| Dated:      May 15, 2009 | /s/ Claire M. Chadwick                     |
|                     | Claire      M. Chadwick                    |
|                     | Senior      Vice President and             |
|                     | Chief      Financial Officer               |