alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2002: Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3  Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christopher M. Palermo

v. Civil No. 08-cv-139-PB

Merrimack County Department of Corrections, 

Superintendent, et al 

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

James R. Muirhead dated September 17, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

October 12, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Christopher M. Palermo , Pro Se

Case 1:08-cv-00139-PB Document 6 Filed 10/12/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1906 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1906

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2002

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Act that established the Pu'uhonua O Honaunau National 
         Historical Park to expand the boundaries of that park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National 
Historical Park Addition Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO PU`UHONUA O HONAUNAU NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    The first section of the Act of July 26, 1955 (69 Stat. 376, ch. 
385; 16 U.S.C. 397), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``That, when'' and inserting the following:
    ``Section 1. (a) When''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(b) The boundaries of Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National Historical 
Park are hereby modified to include approximately 238 acres of lands 
and interests therein within the area identified as `Parcel A' on the 
map entitled `Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park Proposed 
Boundary Additions, Ki`ilae Village', numbered PUHO-P 415/82,013 and 
dated May, 2001.
    ``(c) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire 
approximately 159 acres of lands and interests therein within the area 
identified as `Parcel B' on the map referenced in subsection (b). Upon 
the acquisition of such lands or interests therein, the Secretary shall 
modify the boundaries of Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park 
to include such lands or interests therein.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1991...... 105 12 25 36 32 .319 .037 .078 .103 .091

1992...... 82 14 20 29 18 .237 .039 .062 .083 .050

1993...... 54 7 16 5 26 .155 .020 .049 .014 .069

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... n.a. 40 50 58 n.a. n.a. .085 .114 .124 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
Case 1:06-cv-1Pof^T.11 DI

DREW WEBER,

V.

Plaintiff,

KURT SANBORN; PLAY BALL

MANCHESTER, L.L.C.,

SANBORN ASSOCIATES; THE SANBORN

GROUP, INC.; GERALD R. PRUNIER;

ANDREW A. PROLMAN; THOMAS J.

LEONARD III; PRUNIER, LEONARD &

PROLMAN, P.A.

Defendants.

RSASSSEAPFs006 Page 1 of 2

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

CIVIL ACTION NO.

06-10125-JLA

. . ', .py Cie

ket in the captioned case ;

filed original filed on _7 /

my office on

Thornton

District Cour

assaeh

Joyce London Alexander, M.J.

Defendants Kurt Sanborn, Play Ball Manchester, L.L.C.,

Sanborn Associates and The Sanborn Group, Inc. ("the Sanborn

Defendants") having failed to plead or otherwise defend in this

action and their defaults having been entered,

Now, upon the application of the plaintiff and the

associated affidavits demonstrating that the Sanborn Defendants,

jointly and severally owe plaintiff the sum of $7,749,000.00,

that none of the Sanborn Defendants is an infant or incompetent

person or in the military service of the United States, that the

plaintiff has incurred costs in the sum of $268.20, and that

there is no just reason for delay to enter a final judgment

n 0 thatthe

'ent is true, and correct copy of the

Page -1-

Case 1:07-cv-00017-JM Document 1-1 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 2
against the Sanf^ Defendants on Count TIT , o

b6

of the

Case 1:06-cv-1L-,25-JLA Document 53 Fiied 10/ 04;_ i6 Page 2 of 2

complaint

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff

recover from the Sanborn Defendants, jointly and severally, with

regard to Count III only of the complaint, the princ'ipal amount

of $7,749,000.00, with costs in the amount of $268.20 and

prejudgment interest at the rate of 12% from January 20, 2006 to

October 4, 2006 in the amount of $654,754.90 for a total judgment

of $8,404,023.10, with post judgment interest as provided by law.

Dated: October 4, 2006

Note: The post judgment interest rate effective this date is

5.07%.

Case 1:07-cv-00017-JM Document 1-1 Filed 11/17/06 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Daniel DeMOSS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7379.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 2002.

Decided March 21, 2003.

David Daniel DeMoss, Appellant Pro Se. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, Michael O. Callaghan, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David Daniel DeMoss appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as untimely under the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that DeMoss has not made the requisite showing. *See DeMoss v. United States,*Nos. CR-99-187; CA-02-294-2 (S.D.W.Va. July 19, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
LINENS 'N THINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                      (in thousands, except share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     For the First Quarter Ended
                                                                 -------------------------------------
                                                                    April 3,            March 28,
                                                                      1999                 1998
                                                                 ---------------     -----------------
                                                                             (Unaudited)
<S>                                                              <C>                <C>
Basic

    Weighted-average number of shares outstanding                        39,156                38,763
                                                                 ===============    ==================

    Net income applicable to common shares                               $3,595                $1,475
                                                                 ===============    ==================

    Per share amounts
        Net income per share                                             $ 0.09                $ 0.04
                                                                 ===============    ==================

Diluted

    Weighted-average number of shares outstanding                        40,862                40,206
                                                                 ===============    ==================

    Net income applicable to common shares                               $3,595                $1,475
                                                                 ===============    ==================

    Per share amounts
        Net income per share                                             $ 0.09                $ 0.04
                                                                 ===============    ==================


</TABLE>
II

Calendar No. 73

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1885

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 2001

Received

JUNE 7, 2001

Read the first time

JUNE 8, 2001

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for

adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline

for classification petition and labor certification filings,

and for other purposes.
2

•HR 1885 PCS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Section 245(i) Exten5 sion Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

7 Section 245(i)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)) is amended—

9 (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘2001;’’

10 and inserting ‘‘2001, or during the 120-day period

11 beginning on the date of the enactment of the Sec12 tion 245(i) Extension Act of 2001;’’; and

13 (2) by amending subparagraph (C) to read as

14 follows:

15 ‘‘(C) who, in the case of a beneficiary of a peti16 tion for classification, or an application for labor

17 certification, described in subparagraph (B) that was

18 filed after January 14, 1998—

19 ‘‘(i) was physically present in the United

20 States on December 21, 2000; and

21 ‘‘(ii) demonstrates that the familial or em22 ployment relationship that is the basis of such

23 petition for classification or application for
3

•HR 1885 PCS

1 labor certification existed on or before April 30,

2 2001;’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 73

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1885

AN ACT

To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply

for adjustment of status under section 245(i) ofthe Immigration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline for classification petition andlabor certification filings, and for other purposes.

JUNE 8, 2001

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 159 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 159

  To prohibit a State from determining that a ballot submitted by an 
  absent uniformed services voter was improperly or fraudulently cast 
unless the State finds clear and convincing evidence of fraud, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Riley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit a State from determining that a ballot submitted by an 
  absent uniformed services voter was improperly or fraudulently cast 
unless the State finds clear and convincing evidence of fraud, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Armed Services Voting Act''.

SEC. 2. STANDARD FOR INVALIDATION OF BALLOTS CAST BY ABSENT UNIFORMED 
              SERVICES VOTERS IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS.

    (a) In General.--A State may not refuse to count a ballot submitted 
in an election for Federal office by an absent uniformed services voter 
on the grounds that the ballot was improperly or fraudulently cast 
unless the State finds clear and convincing evidence of fraud in the 
preparation or casting of the ballot by the voter. For purposes of the 
previous sentence, the lack of a witness signature, address, postmark, 
or other identifying information may not be considered clear and 
convincing evidence of fraud (absent any other information or 
evidence).
    (b) No Effect on Filing Deadlines Under State Law.--Nothing in this 
section may be construed to affect the application to ballots submitted 
by absent uniformed services voters of any ballot submission deadline 
applicable under State law.
    (c) Absent Uniformed Services Voter Defined.--In this Act, the term 
``absent uniformed services voter'' has the meaning given such term in 
section 107(1) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-6(1)).

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall apply with respect to ballots submitted for 
elections for Federal office occurring after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2023

NO. 03-22-00802-CV

M. C., Sr. and D. G., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order terminating parental rights signed by the trial court on 

December 6, 2022. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds 

that there was no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s

termination order. Because appellants are indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 27, 2005
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1994...... 100.0 85.5 12.3 1.9 .2 .1 .0

1995...... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

1995: Q4... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996: Q1... 100.0 78.1 17.4 3.6 .6 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 78.0 17.2 4.0 .6 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .5 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997: Q1... 100.0 79.1 16.7 3.7 .4 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.5 15.8 3.2 .3 ... .1

 Q3... 100.0 81.8 15.2 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998: Q1... 100.0 80.6 16.3 2.8 .1 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26