alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1712 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1712

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make adjustments to the 
  boundary of the National Park of American Samoa to include certain 
  portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosega within the park, and for 
                            other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1712

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make adjustments to the 
  boundary of the National Park of American Samoa to include certain 
  portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosega within the park, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT OF THE NATIONAL PARK OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

    Section 2(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the National 
Park of American Samoa'' (16 U.S.C. 410qq-1(b)), approved October 31, 
1988, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1)'', ``(2)'', and ``(3)'' and inserting 
        ``(A)'', ``(B)'', and ``(C)'', respectively;
            (2) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``Included.--''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The Secretary may make adjustments to the boundary of the 
park to include within the park certain portions of the islands of Ofu 
and Olosega, as depicted on the map entitled `National Park of American 
Samoa, Proposed Boundary Adjustment', numbered 82,035 and dated 
February 2002, pursuant to an agreement with the Governor of American 
Samoa and contingent upon the lease to the Secretary of the newly added 
lands. As soon as practicable after a boundary adjustment under this 
paragraph, the Secretary shall modify the maps referred to in paragraph 
(1) accordingly.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

CERTIFICATION 

pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended 

I, Dr. Michael Perry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 20-F of Avita Medical Limited; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: October 31, 2019  
/s/ Dr. Michael Perry
  
Dr. Michael Perry
  
Chief Executive Officer
**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Tom Cossette, et al.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-00347-JL

Angela Poulin, et al.

 INTERIM ORDER

A hearing on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment

will be held August 26, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

On or before August 12, 2008, the parties shall brief

(limit, 15 pages) the following issues:

(1) Whether the allegedly retaliatory action taken by

the defendants (terminating his library position,

ultimately resulting in NJA status) constitutes an

adverse action which is sufficient to state a

claim (see, e.g., Morris v. Powell, 449 F.3d 682

(5th Cir. 2006)); and

(2) Whether the plaintiff’s conduct (providing inmate

Belton a written statement to utilize in an effort

to recover alleged photocopying overcharges, or

any related “misappropriation”) is

constitutionally protected speech under the First

Amendment in the context of this § 1983 action

(see, e.g., McElroy v. Lopac, 403 F.3d 855 (7th

Cir. 2005)).

In briefing these issues, the parties are not bound by any

of the findings and rulings set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

December 18, 2006 order authorizing service on the defendants.

Case 1:06-cv-00347-JL Document 19 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 29, 2008

cc: Tom Cossette, pro se

Deborah B. Weissbard, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00347-JL Document 19 Filed 07/29/08 Page 2 of 2
II

Calendar No. 136

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1753

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AUGUST 2, 2001

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 419 Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke,

Virginia, as the ‘‘M. Caldwell Butler Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 419 Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Vir6 ginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘M. Caldwell

7 Butler Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1753 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘M. Caldwell Butler Post Office Building’’.

Calendar No. 136

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1753

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 419 Rutherford Avenue,

N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ‘‘M. CaldwellButler Post Office Building’’.

AUGUST 2, 2001

Reported without amendment
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41080

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SANDRO MEDINA-TENIENTE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-03-CR-357-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sandro Medina-Teniente pleaded guilty to being found

unlawfully present in the United States after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that the special

condition of supervised release that prohibits him from

possessing a “dangerous weapon,” which is contained in the

written judgment, conflicts with the district court’s oral

pronouncement of sentence and must be deleted. His argument is

foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v.
No. 03-41080

-2-

Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 394, 937-38 (5th Cir. 2003). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cerence Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2019  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: December 19, 2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Mark Gallenberger                             |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Mark Gallenberger                                      |
|                    |   |   | Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
1If so, plaintiffs’ counsel is reminded that an adequate

privilege log is required.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel W. Miles, et al.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-056-JM

W. John Funk, et al.

O R D E R

 Interrogatories and production requests are to parties. Ms.

Neumann is not a party. Documents controlled by her, and over

which Miles, Hamacher and/or Tavernier have no control, cannot be

reached under Rules 33 and 34. If defendants want her documents

they must use Rule 45.1 Defendants’ responsive documents must be

produced.

The motion (document no. 48) is granted as set forth above. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 18, 2006

cc: Evan M. Fray-Witzer, Esq.

 Russell F. Hilliard, Esq. 

 Michael C. McLaughlin, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00056-JM Document 55 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1139

To terminate the participation of the Forest Service in the Recreational

Fee Demonstration Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 2001

Mrs. BONO (for herself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mr. HERGER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concered

A BILL

To terminate the participation of the Forest Service in the

Recreational Fee Demonstration Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forest Tax Relief

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 1139 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF RECREATIONAL FEE DEM2 ONSTRATION PROGRAM FOR THE FOREST

3 SERVICE.

4 (a) TERMINATION.—On and after the effective date

5 of this section, the Secretary of Agriculture may not im6 pose or collect any fee under the authority of the Rec7 reational Fee Demonstration Program authorized by sec8 tion 315 of the Department of the Interior and Related

9 Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (section 101(c) of Pub10 lic Law 104–134; 16 U.S.C. 460l–6a note). Amounts col11 lected before that date shall continue to be used by the

12 Secretary in the manner provided in that section.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section 315 of

14 the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Ap15 propriations Act, 1996 (section 101(c) of Public Law 104–

16 134; 16 U.S.C. 460l–6a note), is amended—

17 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and the Sec18 retary of Agriculture (acting through the Forest

19 Service) shall each’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’;

20 (B) in subsection (b)—

21 (i) by striking ‘‘appropriate Secretary’’ and

22 inserting ‘‘Secretary’’; and

23 (ii) by striking ‘‘four agencies’’ and insert24 ing ‘‘three agencies’’; and

25 (C) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘and the Sec26 retary of Agriculture’’.
3

•HR 1139 IH

1 (2) Section 334 of the Department of the Interior

2 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public

3 Law 106–291; 114 Stat. 997; 16 U.S.C. 460l–6a note),

4 is amended by striking the last sentence.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend6 ments made by this section shall take effect 10 days after

7 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T FEB 17, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 8- 12 75 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 6- 00 34 9- CR-T-3 0- MAP UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,
Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us MARQUIS DARGON, a.k .a. Pig , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Febru ar y 1 7, 2 00 9) Befo re TJ OFLAT, BIRCH an d HULL, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Tho m as H. Ostr an de r, ap po in te d c ouns el forMarqui s Dar go n i n t hi s d ire ctcri m in al an d s en te nc in g app eal , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er rep res en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o An de rs v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of th e en ti re re co rdrev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rdrev eal s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , and Darg on ’s con vi ct io n a ndsen te nc e are AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard A. Post, President and Chief Executive Officer of Autobytel Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Autobytel Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 31, 2005



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD A. POST                                
|Richard A. Post, President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Guardian Angel Credit Union

v. Case No. 08-cv-261-PB

 et al

ORDER ON NONCONFORMING DOCUMENT

IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5.2

DOCUMENT/FILER: #35, Motion to Amend Class Action Complaint, filed by Attorney Cooper

DATE: September 2, 2009

The document above fails to comply with: 

LR 15.1(b) An amended pleading shall reproduce the entire complaint as amended

The document will remain on file. Unless a document curing the defect is filed by September 16,

2009 , the original document will be treated as withdrawn and will not be ruled upon by a judicial officer.

The motion with the complete proposed amended complaint curing the defect shall be refiled in ECF.

No action on the nonconforming motion will be taken until the defect is cured.

Any time periods with regard to this document will run from the date the defect is cured by the

submission of a conforming pleading without further order of the court.

SO ORDERED.

September 3, 2009 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00261-PB Document 36 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSCRYPT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,117
<PP&E>                                          13,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,421
<BONDS>                                          4,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,009
<SALES>                                         19,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,855
<CGS>                                           13,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,346<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (8)<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (931)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.26)
<FN>
<F1>ITEM INCLUDES A ONE TIME CHARGE OF IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
OF $9.8 MILLION.
<F2>INTEREST EXPENSE IS NET OF $436 OF INTEREST INCOME LESS $428 OF INTEREST
EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rex Fornaro

v. Case No. 06-cv-468-PB

Daniel Neelon, et al.

O R D E R

Re: Document No. 113, Objection to Neelon Defendants’

Motion for Dismissal, Default and Other Sanctions 

Ruling: Plaintiff’s objection fails to respond to the charges

made in the motion. Within 10 days, the plaintiff shall file a

memorandum specifically responding to the arguments on which

defendants’ motion is based. The memorandum shall incorporate any

other document by reference. A failure to comply with this Order

shall result in the motion being granted. 

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

District Judge

Date: July 23, 2008

cc: Gordon Blakeney, Jr., Esq.

William Bogaert, Esq.

Michele Carlucci, Esq.

Robert Consavage, Esq.

Christopher Flanagan, Esq.

Ralph Suozzo, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00468-PB Document 125 Filed 07/23/08 Page 1 of 1
No. 72-1032.

#### Lachmann *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.