alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1992...... 71.7 78.5 63.5 66.3 47.8 75.3 57.3 59.1 61.2 78.6 1993...... 76.7 84.6 70.0 70.3 48.2 78.1 60.1 61.0 64.5 83.9 1994...... 75.1 82.9 74.3 72.3 51.6 75.7 58.6 59.8 70.4 80.2 1995...... 73.8 83.9 75.9 73.0 53.1 72.2 61.7 63.9 73.6 76.7 1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2001: Q1... 67.7 64.7 73.7 73.4 50.8 63.9 60.0 60.4 66.4 70.4  Q2... 76.1 77.5 56.8 73.8 79.0 85.1 57.3 57.4 69.0 86.2  Q3... 76.5 72.5 72.6 75.5 54.9 86.9 58.0 63.5 70.7 86.6  Q4... 78.1 74.2 63.6 78.3 38.0 88.5 60.5 63.3 72.2 84.4 2002: Q1... 72.3 62.1 64.1 69.7 57.9 88.1 64.2 57.5 64.4 79.5  Q2... 75.1 56.2 72.9 74.5 52.8 89.1 69.6 67.6 72.9 79.3  Q3... 72.2 53.6 57.8 78.2 75.1 67.9 68.5 68.7 68.5 74.8  Q4... 81.4 78.1 65.4 81.8 37.9 93.5 67.6 62.8 68.0 92.2 2003: Q1... 74.7 64.0 79.5 75.4 61.7 86.0 68.2 67.5 63.7 80.8  Q2... 69.2 53.9 63.8 67.1 74.0 84.0 66.7 62.8 54.8 79.9  Q3... 78.2 74.9 41.0 81.0 78.2 88.8 69.7 64.4 73.6 84.1  Q4... 74.9 75.5 53.0 75.3 67.4 87.1 66.0 65.6 61.6 83.4 2004: Q1... 69.4 65.2 62.7 66.8 55.1 86.3 64.5 66.2 61.9 72.3  Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
. 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Hon. 8. P. Lockhart, Chairman 

Board or xnsuranoa Comalssloners 

Austin, Taxas 

Dear Sir: 

you submit the ab 

1s a.oopy of the 

Corporfltlon, For 

an amendment 

quired to loo 

fnaemuoh aa t 

August 3, 19I.4; wherein 

pinion of thla department, 

he General Imurenoe 

ved April 27, ,19C3, end 

submitted, we are rel&al Artlolea of Inoorporatlon, 

medtioned relates strlotly to 

1969, Revised Clvll Statutes. 

the adoption or mmle. 

It is, therefore, the opinion of thla department 

that the oherter of the General lneurance Corporfltion, Fort 
!ic,n ::. I.. I.oc!ihort, 1’8~~ 2 

;;orth, Texas, IS lnsufflclent to mthorl;st? thn wr1tinf-f or 

.‘orkr;len’o Co.qmnaation IImurRnCe. 

Yours very truly.
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Cindy Wang, certify that:





(a) A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities
      and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2018 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity,
      the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-D Owner Trust, as issuer, during the period from November 7, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.





March 21, 2019





By:  /s/ Cindy Wang


Cindy Wang


Group Vice President - Treasury


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-D Owner Trust
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicant have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission,  Washington, DC 20573. 

## Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder Transportation Intermediary Applicant: 

Nautica Cargo Services Inc. dba Navinsa Line, 7911 N.W. 72 Ave. 219B, Miami, FL 33166,  Officer:  Christian A. Hernandez, President  (Qualifying Individual). 

Dated: September 19, 2008. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Assistant Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-22422 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jonathan Perfetto

v. Case No. 06-cv-307-SM

NH State Prison, et al.

ORDER

Re: Document No. 7, Motion for Immediate Attention

Ruling: It appears that the plaintiff’s "motion for immediate

relief" (document no. 7) has not been specifically ruled on, but

the subject matter has been addressed, albeit indirectly, in

previous reports and orders. In any event, the motion does not

describe facts which would warrant the relief requested (i.e.

court-ordered alteration of his secure housing unit custody

status) and is otherwise moot at this point. The motion is denied,

but without prejudice to refiling if different conditions

warranting relief currently obtain.

__________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge 

Date: September 11, 2007

cc: Andrew Perfetto, pro se

Anthony Blenkinsop, Esq. 

Case 1:06-cv-00307-JL Document 72 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v . Case No. 06-cr-181-01-SM

John Teves

ORDER

Defendant Teves's motion to continue the final pretrial conference and tria l

is granted (document 54) . Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2008 trial

period. Defendant Teves shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

February 8, 2008 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : February 22, 2008 at 1030 a .m

Jury Selection : March 4, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 55 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

January 28, 2008

cc : Don Kennedy, Esq .

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 55 Filed 01/28/08 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT to18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES —OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael E. Jalbert, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| ** ** | **/S/  Michael E. Jalbert**    |
|------------|--------------------------------|
|       | Michael  E. Jalbert            |
|       | Chief  Executive Officer       |
|       | (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

**August 6, 2010**

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.*

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-384-JD

B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.

O R D E R

This case was filed at the same time and by the same

plaintiff as the following cases: Bogdanov v. Concentra

Integrated Services, Inc., 06-cv-382-JD; Bogdanov v. Nsight

Technologies, LLC, 06-cv-383-SM; Bogdanov v. Physicians Specialty

Hospital of ElPaso East, L.P., 06-cv-385-PB; and Bogdanov v.

Christus Health Corporation, 06-cv-386-SM. Motions to withdraw

the reference from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the

District of New Hampshire, along with the bankruptcy court’s

report and recommendation on each motion, are pending in all five

cases. The motions to withdraw the reference raise the same

legal principles and share similar factual bases. 

As such, with respect to the motions to withdraw the

reference from the bankruptcy court, these may be related cases

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Local Rule 42.1. 

Unless the parties or counsel advise the court otherwise, these

cases will be consolidated solely for the purpose of addressing

Case 1:06-cv-00384-JD Document 3 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

the motions to withdraw the reference. Any objection or other

response to the order of consolidation shall be filed on or

before November 6, 2006.

In addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(2) the parties

each shall file a notice as to whether each consents to referral

of the adversary proceedings to the bankruptcy court, if the

motions for withdrawal of the reference were denied, “to hear and

determine and to enter appropriate orders and judgments, subject

to review under section 158.” Consents or notice that a party

does not consent to referral under § 157(c)(2) shall be filed on

or before November 6, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

October 24, 2006

cc: Geraldine L. Karonis, Esquire

B&H Foto & Elecctronics Corp.

Olga L. Bogdanov, pro se

US Bankruptcy Court-NH, Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00384-JD Document 3 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging, Special Emphasis 
Panel, Aging Bone.
    Date: October 15, 2008.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging Gateway, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20814, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, PhD, DSC, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9c4c8dbc2c6dedac8e9c7c0c887c7c0c187cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80ede1f2ebeff7f3e1c0eee9e1aeeee9e8aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging, Special Emphasis 
Panel, Training Grants.
    Date: October 16-17, 2008.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott, 5701 Marinelli Road, Rockville, 
MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Ramesh Vemuri, PhD, Chief, Scientific Review 
Office, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2c-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-
7700 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#215357131253614f48490f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a484c0809487a545352145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-22298 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1717 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1717

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to require Department of 
  Veterans Affairs pharmacies to dispense medications to veterans for 
prescriptions written by private practitioners, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2001

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to require Department of 
  Veterans Affairs pharmacies to dispense medications to veterans for 
prescriptions written by private practitioners, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PHARMACIES TO 
              DISPENSE MEDICATIONS TO VETERANS ON PRESCRIPTIONS WRITTEN 
              BY PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS.

    (a) Authority.--Subsection (d) of section 1712 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Subject to section 1722A of this title, the Secretary shall 
furnish to a veteran such drugs and medicines as may be ordered on 
prescription of a duly licensed physician in the treatment of any 
illness or injury of the veteran.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--(1) The heading of that section is 
amended by striking the sixth through ninth words.
    (2) The item relating to that section in the table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 17 of that title is amended by striking the 
sixth through ninth words.
                                 <all>
```
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1737

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that witnesses at Federal

grand jury proceedings have the right to the assistance of counsel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that

witnesses at Federal grand jury proceedings have the

right to the assistance of counsel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That chapter 215 of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘§ 3323. Right to assistance of counsel

7 ‘‘A witness before a grand jury shall have the right

8 to have an attorney present in the room where the grand

9 jury is sitting to assist that witness while the witness is

10 being questioned.’’; and
2

•HR 1737 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end of the table of sections

2 at the beginning of such chapter the following new

3 item:

‘‘3323. Right to assistance of counsel.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robyn Andrade

v. Civil No. 06-cv-210-PB

Target Corporation

ORDER

Re: Document No. 5, Motion to Remand to State Court

Ruling: Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the amount in

controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold. In making this

determination, I have relied on the plaintiff’s stipulation as well

as all other evidence in the record. The case shall be remanded to

superior court. Each party shall initially bear their own fees and

expenses incurred in litigating the remand question subject to the

power of the presiding court to reallocate fees and expenses in a

final judgment.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

U.S. District Judge

Date: September 1, 2006

cc: Nancy Richards-Stower, Esq.

Jeffrey Scott Brody, Esq.

Joan Ackerstein, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00210-PB Document 12 Filed 09/01/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

MICHELLE L. PAGE, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) Civil No. 05-027-B

 )

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner, )

 Social Security Administration, )

 )

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

 ORDER RE:STIPULATION

Whereas the parties desire to resolve the matter of

entitlement to attorney's fees and costs without further time and

expense, the plaintiff, Michelle L. Page, and the defendant, the

Commissioner of Social Security Administration, by their

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as

follows:

That the payment of Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars

($3,500.00) by the United States Social Security Administration

provides for full settlement in satisfaction of all costs and any

and all claims for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to

Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

Case 1:05-cv-00027-PB Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: FOR THE DEFENDANT:

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Francis Jackson By: /s/ David L. Broderick

Francis Jackson, Esquire David L. Broderick, AUSA 

Maine Bar No. 0045 NH Bar No. 0123

85 India Street 53 Pleasant Street

P.O. Box 17713 Concord, NH 03301

Portland, ME 04112-8713 (603) 225-1552

(207) 772-9000

Dated: June 23, 2005 Dated: June 23, 2005

DONE and ORDERED at Concord, New Hampshire, this 28th day of June

, 2005.

 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

 U.S. District Court Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00027-PB Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-157-01-SM

Chad Ramish

O R D E R

Defendant Ramish’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the September

2007 trial period. Defendant Ramish shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than May 24, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 11:30 a.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00157-SM Document 15 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 16, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00157-SM Document 15 Filed 05/16/07 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Moises ALVAREZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50599.

D.C. No. CR-00-00032-RT-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Moisés Alvarez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and 120-month sentence for *736conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Alvarez’s counsel has submitted a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.

Our independent review of the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.