alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1448 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1448

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1448

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by 
                   the Government of American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS AND OTHER 
              OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and Local 
Governments.--Subsection (b) of section 202 of Public Law 98-454 (48 
U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Exemption of All Bonds From Income Taxation by State and 
Local Governments.--
            ``(1) In general.--The interest on any bond or other 
        obligation issued by or on behalf of the Government of American 
        Samoa shall be exempt from taxation by the Government of 
        American Samoa and the governments of any of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, any territory or possession 
        of the United States, and any subdivision thereof.
            ``(2) Exemption applicable only to income taxes.--The 
        exemption provided by paragraph (1) shall not apply to gift, 
        estate, inheritance, legacy, succession, or other wealth 
        transfer taxes.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

RIEK J. KUANY, 

Defendant. 

8:23MJ224 

ORDER 

 

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska. 

IT IS ORDERED that Jason E. Troia is appointed as attorney of record for the 

above-named defendant in this matter and shall forthwith file an appearance in this 

matter. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender’s Office shall 

forthwith provide counsel with a draft appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the 

name and other identifying information of the CJA Panel attorney identified in 

accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for this district. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska and Jason E. Troia. 

 DATED this 25th day of April, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00107-RFR-MDN Doc # 8 Filed: 04/25/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Christopher Kafelelis

06-cr-68-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

36) filed by defendant is granted .

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : December 7, 200 7

cc : Terry L . Ollila, AUSA

Patrick J . Richard, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00068-JD Document 37 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 1
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**December 2002**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: December 31, 2002**
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1366 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1366

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2002

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Government 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States Post Office building located at 3101 
  West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, as the ``Hector G. 
                    Godinez Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HECTOR G. GODINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office building located at 3101 West 
Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




September 2007


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ECHELON INTERNATIONAL FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,400
<SECURITIES>                                    22,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,000
<PP&E>                                         204,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 478,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,700
<BONDS>                                         85,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     216,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   478,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,600)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    800
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.29





 Exhibit 10.29 

AMENDMENT 
 TO 

INHIBRX, INC. 
 2017
EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR AND CONSULTANT EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 In accordance with those certain resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors and stockholders of Inhibrx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), the 2017 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of the Company is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan as
follows: 
 “(a) The number of Shares which may be issued from time to time pursuant to this Plan shall be 4,355,555
shares of Common Stock or the equivalent of such number of Shares after the Administrator, in its sole discretion, has interpreted the effect of any stock split, stock dividend, combination, recapitalization or similar transaction in accordance with
Paragraph 24 of the Plan.” 
 2. Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this Amendment to the Plan (this “Amendment”), all
capitalized words, phrases, or defined terms used in this Amendment will have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 3. Except as expressly set
forth in this Amendment, there have been no other changes or modifications to the Plan, and the Plan remains otherwise unchanged and in full force and effect. 
  

	4.	 This Amendment shall be effective as of July 30, 2019. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed effective as of the date set forth above. 

 

			
	INHIBRX, INC.,
	a Delaware corporation
		
	By:	 	  /s/ Mark Lappe
	Name:	 	Mark Lappe
	Title:	 	  CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ANTHONY OMAR BROCKMAN, 

Defendant. 

8:23MJ325 

ORDER 

 

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the Federal 

Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith 

file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public Defender should 

decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of the Criminal Justice Act 

Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a draft 

appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other identifying information of 

the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for 

this district. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska. 

 DATED this 2nd day of June, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Michael D. Nelson 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-mj-00325-SMB Doc # 5 Filed: 06/02/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-181-01-SM

John Teves

O R D E R

Defendant Teves’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 56). This case has been continued numerous times. No

further continuances will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2008 trial period. The defendant 

shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than February 29, 2008. On

the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: April 24, 2008 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: May 6, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 57 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 19, 2008

cc: Don Kennedy, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 57 Filed 02/19/08 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1497 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1497

 To revoke the authority to extend permanent normal trade relations to 
                    the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

  Mr. Murtha (for himself, Mr. Holden, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Doyle, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. Capuano, and Mr. 
    Larson of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revoke the authority to extend permanent normal trade relations to 
                    the People's Republic of China.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF AUTHORITY TO EXTEND PERMANENT NORMAL TRADE 
              RELATIONS TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

    (a) Revocation of Authority.--Sections 101 and 102 of Public Law 
106-286 are repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Public Law 106-286 is amended--
            (1) in division A, by striking the division heading and the 
        heading for title I and inserting the following:

              ``DIVISION A--RELIEF FROM MARKET DISRUPTION

              ``TITLE I--RELIEF FROM MARKET DISRUPTION'';

                and
            (2) in the table of contents, by striking the items 
        relating to division A and inserting the following:

              ``DIVISION A--RELIEF FROM MARKET DISRUPTION

                ``Title I--Relief From Market Disruption

``Sec. 101. [Repealed]
``Sec. 102. [Repealed]
``Sec. 103. Relief from market disruption.
``Sec. 104. Amendment to section 123 of the Trade Act of 1974--
                            Compensation authority.''.
                                 <all>
```
U .S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

SEP 12 zaoe

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Lisa Murphv, Individually and

as Mother and Next Friend of D .B .

v . CivilNo . 06-cv-459-JD

United States of America and

Franklin Regional Hospital

O R D E R

The court has reviewed the assented-to motion for approval

of settlement on behalf of a minor (document no . 41) pursuant to

Local Rule 17 .1, along with the proposed order and exhibits

attached thereto . The court has granted the motion and approved

the proposed order . The parties are ordered to comply with all

of the terms and conditions of the motion and the proposed order .

The court retains jurisdiction of this case in order to enforce

the terms and conditions of the motion and the proposed order

should that become necessary .

The parties have requested that the motion for approval be

sealed because there exists a confidentiality agreement between

the parties (document no . 42) . Absent extraordinary

circumstances, which do not exist in this case, the court will

not seal documents . In lieu of sealing the documents and in

order to preserve the confidentiality agreement between the

parties, the motion for approval of settlement and the assentedCase 1:06-cv-00459-JD Document 45 Filed 09/12/08 Page 1 of 2
to motion to seal will be returned to counsel for the plaintiff .

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the parties' motion to sea l

(document no . 42) is denied . The motion for approval (document

no . 41) and the motion to seal (document no . 42) will be returned

to counsel for the plaintiffs .

SO ORDERED .

September /a , 200 8

CC : Jared Green, Esq .

Kevin Dugan, Esq .

Gretchen Leah Witt, Esq .

Ronald Lajoie, Esq .

T . David Plourde, Esq .

Mary Schwarzer, Esq .

ose h A . DiC ric , Jr .

United States District Ju g e

2

Case 1:06-cv-00459-JD Document 45 Filed 09/12/08 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1160

To terminate operation of the Extremely Low Frequency Communication

System of the Navy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. BARRETT, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. FILNER,

Mr. KIND, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. LUTHER, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. OBERSTAR,

Mr. OBEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. STARK, and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To terminate operation of the Extremely Low Frequency

Communication System of the Navy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF OPERATION OF THE EX4 TREMELY LOW FREQUENCY COMMUNICA5 TION SYSTEM.

6 (a) TERMINATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the

7 Navy shall terminate the operation of the Extremely Low

8 Frequency Communication System of the Navy.
2

•HR 1160 IH

1 (b) MAINTENANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE.—The Sec2 retary shall maintain the infrastructure necessary for re3 suming operation of the Extremely Low Frequency Com4 munication System.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-46-01-SM

Rayner Herrera

O R D E R

Defendant Herrera’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial is granted 

(document 12). Trial has been rescheduled for the December 2006 trial period. Defendant

Herrera shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than August 7, 2006. On the filing of

such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in

that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: November 27, 2006 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: December 5, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

July 28, 2006

cc: R. Brian Snow, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00046-SM Document 14 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Eugene Williams

Criminal No. 06-cr-161-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

17) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: April 17, 2007

cc: Richard Foley, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00161-JD Document 18 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended August 31, 2008, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being,
Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
      October 20, 2008/s/
      Bruce Korman
                    
                    /s/
      Edmund KingChief
      Executive Officer
                    
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Cash Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Cash Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.