alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8717-7]


Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency is 
announcing the 2008 Fall Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission 
(OTC). This OTC meeting will explore options available for reducing 
ground-level ozone precursors in a multi-pollutant context.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 19, 2008 starting at 9 a.m. 
and ending at 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Tremont Grand Historic Venue, 225 North Charles Street, 
Baltimore, Maryland 21201; (443) 573-8444.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For documents and press inquiries 
contact: Ozone Transport Commission, 444 North Capitol Street, NW., 
Suite 638, Washington, DC 20001; (202) 508-3840; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e514451505b7e514a5d5f574c10514c59"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4cbdecbcac1e4cbd0c7c5cdd68acbd6c3">[email protected]</span></a>; Web site: http://www.otcair.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain 
at section 184 provisions for the ``Control of Interstate Ozone Air 
Pollution.'' Section 184(a) establishes an ``Ozone Transport Region'' 
(OTR) comprised of the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, 
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, 
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, parts of Virginia and the District 
of Columbia. The purpose of the Ozone Transport commission is to deal 
with ground-level ozone formation, transport, and control within the 
OTR.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Agenda: Copies of the final agenda will be available from the OTC 
office (202) 508-3840; by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741b0e1b1a11341b0017151d065a1b0613"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c23362322290c23382f2d253e62233e2b">[email protected]</span></a> or via the OTC Web 
site at http://www.otcair.org.

    Dated: September 11, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E8-21963 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JESUS MANUEL SILVA-HUIZAR, 

Defendant. 

8:23CR122 

ORDER 

 

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the Federal 

Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith 

file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public Defender should 

decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of the Criminal Justice Act 

Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a draft 

appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other identifying information of 

the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for 

this district. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska. 

 DATED this 14th day of June, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00122-BCB-SMB Doc # 31 Filed: 06/14/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 94
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1426

To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to provide that low-speed electric

personal assistive mobility devices are consumer products subject to that

Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. BASS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to provide that

low-speed electric personal assistive mobility devices are

consumer products subject to that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY ACT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Consumer Product Safety

5 Act (15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.) is amended by adding at

6 the end the following:
2

•HR 1426 IH

1 ‘‘LOW-SPEED ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY

2 DEVICES

3 ‘‘SEC. 39. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision

4 of law, low-speed electric personal assistive mobility de5 vices are consumer products within the meaning of section

6 3(a)(1) and shall be subject to the Commission regulations

7 published at section 1500.18(a)(12) and part 1512 of title

8 16, Code of Federal Regulations.

9 ‘‘(b) For the purpose of this section, the term ‘low10 speed electric personal assistive mobility device’ means a

11 2- or 3-wheeled device with an electric propulsion system

12 of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed

13 on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a

14 propulsion system while ridden by an operator who weighs

15 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph.

16 ‘‘(c) To further protect the safety of consumers who

17 ride low-speed electric personal assistive mobility devices,

18 the Commission may promulgate new or amended require19 ments applicable to such vehicles as necessary and appro20 priate.

21 ‘‘(d) This section shall supersede any State law or

22 requirement with respect to low-speed electric personal as23 sistive mobility devices to the extent that such State law

24 or requirement is more stringent than the Federal law or

25 requirements referred to in subsection (a).’’.
3

•HR 1426 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents

2 preceding section 2 of such Act is amended by adding at

3 the end the following:

‘‘Sec. 39. Low-speed electric personal assistive mobility devices.’’.

4 SEC. 2. MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS.

5 For purposes of motor vehicle safety standards pre6 scribed and enforced pursuant to chapter 301 of title 49,

7 United States Code, a low-speed electric personal assistive

8 mobility device (as defined in section 39(b) of the Con9 sumer Product Safety Act, as amended by this Act) shall

10 not be considered a motor vehicle as defined by section

11 30102(6) of title 49, United States Code.

Æ
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 75 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) and Amendment No. 704 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
    of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment
    deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young

  

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  September 6, 2019
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1992...... 1.0 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.8 1.0 1.8 .3 1.5

1993...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.2 .8 1.4 .2 1.2

1994...... .8 .3 .4 .1 .3 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1995...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

1996: Q2... 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .3 .6 .2 .4 2.3 .8 1.5 .4 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997: Q1... 1.3 .7 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.7 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.0 .7 1.3 .3 .9

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998: Q1... 1.3 .8 .6 .2 .4 3.2 1.8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q2... 1.1 .5 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.1 1.3 .5 .8

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.1 .8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999: Q1... 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .4 3.7 2.1 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.3 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .5 2.2 .8 1.4 .4 1.0

 Q4... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000: Q1... 1.3 .6 .6 .2 .5 3.0 1.5 1.5 .4 1.1

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.2 .9 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 1.9 .7 1.2 .2 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001: Q1... 1.7 1.0 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.2 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q2... 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .4 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Q3... 1.2 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
Although all federal Defendants have now been dismissed from

1

this action, see Order and Memorandum Granting Federal Defendant’s

Motion to Dismiss, (Document #6) (dismissing last federal Defendant),

the Court identifies the case as it was originally filed, see

Complaint.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

GERARD BOULANGER, :

 Plaintiff, :

 :

v. : NH 06-cv-00308-ECT

 : RI MC 07-23 T

U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, :

NEW HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT, et al., : 1

 Defendants. :

ORDER

 GRANTING MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings,

Extend Discovery Deadlines and Continue Trial Window (“Motion to

Stay” or “Motion”). Plaintiff Gerard Boulanger (“Plaintiff”) has

filed an objection to the Motion, arguing that discovery has been

completed and that the case should be set for trial. See

Objection to Defendants ’ Motion to Stay. The Court presently [ ]

has under advisement the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the

remaining Defendants, and the Court must decide the summary

judgment motion before this case can be set down for trial. 

Accordingly, the Motion to Stay is GRANTED.

So ordered.

ENTER:

/s/ David L. Martin 

DAVID L. MARTIN

United States Magistrate Judge

August 27, 2008

Case 1:06-cv-00308-SM Document 73 Filed 08/28/08 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**Officer Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PSCo on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of the undersigned officers of PSCocertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)          The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of PSCo as of the dates and forthe periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.

 

Date: Aug. 3, 2009

 
|   | /s/  TIM E. TAYLOR                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Tim E. Taylor                               |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE  III                |
|   | Benjamin G.S. Fowke III                     |
|   | Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PSCo andwill be retained by PSCo and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      32,506,291              32,506,291
<SECURITIES>                                21,724,962              21,724,962
<RECEIVABLES>                              386,178,715             386,178,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,254,424               5,254,424
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,826,540               1,826,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                 358,278                 358,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             449,684,605             449,684,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      208,066,437             208,066,437
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       134,052                 134,052
<OTHER-SE>                                 241,484,116             241,484,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               449,684,605             449,684,605
<SALES>                                     14,770,244              42,572,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,423,020              45,606,536
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,929,477               9,709,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               393,737               2,600,309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,173,511               9,843,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,926,295              23,452,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,582,812               9,395,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,343,483              14,057,514
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,343,483              14,057,514 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40                    1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39                    1.10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1347 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1347

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 811 South Main Street in Yerington, Nevada, as the ``Joseph E. Dini, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

  Mr. Gibbons (for himself and Ms. Berkley) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 811 South Main Street in Yerington, Nevada, as the ``Joseph E. Dini, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH E. DINI, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 811 South Main Street in Yerington, Nevada, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Joseph E. Dini, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Joseph E. 
Dini, Jr. Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of
Linens 'n Things, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended October 2,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Norman Axelrod, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
William T. Giles, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



    /s/ Norman Axelrod
-----------------------------------
NAME:    Norman Axelrod
TITLE:   Chairman and Chief
         Executive Officer
DATE:    July 1, 2005



    /s/ William T. Giles
-----------------------------------
NAME:    William T. Giles
TITLE:   Executive Vice President
         and Chief Financial Officer
DATE:    July 1, 2005


                                       38
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven A. Swan

V.

Paul J. Barbadoro, et al.

Civil No. 07-fp-1

RECUSAL ORDER

The undersigned hereby recuse themselves from presiding over

this case.

SO ORDERED.

January 10, 2007

January 10, 2007

January 10, 2007

cc: Steven A. Swan, Dro se

C& 2) 4( 040-06. Le - -^ -

seph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:07-cv-00001-GZS Document 4 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Edmund D. LaChance, Jr.

v.

Jessica C. Millette, et al.

No. 07-fp-121

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $30.00 is due no later than May

15, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the Souza

Baranowski Correctional Center when the amount in the account

exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure

to pay the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action

without prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for

in forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-121-PB.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 27, 2007

cc: Edmund D. LaChance, Jr., pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00121-PB Document 3 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1

LaChance v. Millette et al Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit 11


          Computation of Historical Net Income (loss) Per Common Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                                           January 31,               January 31,
                                                       1996          1997         1996         1997
                                                    ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------
<S> <C>
          Net income                                $  293,315    $  583,932   $  201,429   $1,002,103
                                                    ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========

          Weighted average number of shares
          outstanding                                4,000,000     6,224,850    4,000,000    5,400,002
          Add:
              Shares issuable upon conversion of
                Series A Redeemable Convertible
                Preferred Stock                        992,061                    992,061

              Shares issuable from the assumed
                exercise of options as determined
                by the application of the
                treasury stock method                  611,144       627,094      611,144      627,094
                                                    ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                     5,603,205     6,851,944    5,603,205    6,027,096
                                                    ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========
          Net income per common share               $     0.05    $     0.09   $     0.04   $     0.17
                                                    ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>

The above computations include all common equivalent shares issued within the 12
months  preceding  the filing date as if they were  outstanding  for all periods
presented  (using the treasury stock method) and the as if converted method with
regards to the Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock.