alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

[to be published]. 

# Status:

Closed Meeting. 

# Place:

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC. 

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:

Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 1 p.m. 

# Change in the meeting:

Cancellation of Meeting. 

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 18, 2008 has been cancelled. 

For further information please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: September 18, 2008. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22195 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### George J. A. SEYMOUR, Trading as Seymour and Company, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Richard J. FRANEK, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 17707.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 20, 1942.

Charles J. Mundy, of New Orleans, for .appellant.

George P. Nosacka and Clarence E. Strauch, both of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

In an application for rehearing, plaintiff, appellant, finds fault with our finding of fact that “Franek, through another firm of brokers, Dane and Weil, borrowed from the Prudential Life Insurance Company, $17,500 * * Counsel for plaintiff says in his brief that the phrase '“through another firm of brokers” is erroneous since Dane and Weil, and other various persons, constituted the same firm to which the original application for the loan was made. When we used the phrase '“through another firm of brokers”, we intended to distinguish between the plaintiff, Seymour, with whom Franek had contracted in the first instance, and the other firm through which he finally negotiated the loan.

We write this merely that there may 'be no misunderstanding concerning the facts which we found.

The application for rehearing is denied.

Rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1326 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1326

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 203 West Paige Street in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, as the ``Tim Lee 
                     Carter Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2001

Mr. Whitfield introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 203 West Paige Street in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, as the ``Tim Lee 
                     Carter Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 203 
West Paige Street in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tim Lee Carter Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Tim Lee Carter Post Office 
Building.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 54-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 16 of 16
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32(b)



                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CFO


         The undersigned, Kirk R. Oliver, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial  Officer of TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
         September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

   2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 9th day of November, 2004.




                                         /s/ Kirk R. Oliver
                                        --------------------------------------
                                         Name:    Kirk R. Oliver
                                         Title:   Executive Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
__________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2          Q3           Q4           Total
__________________________________________________________________________________

1982......    |             2           3           3             3             11
1983......    |             1           1           2             3              7
1984......    |             3           7          10            12             32
1985......    |            12          21          17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14          21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19          12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6          12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7           5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5           6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2           3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1           1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2           2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2           0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0           0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0           1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0           0             1              2
2003......    |             0           1           0          n.a.           n.a.
__________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin J. Bean

v. 06-cv-161-SM

State of New Hampshire, et al.

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated June 29, 2006, for the reasons set forth therein as no objection has

been filed. 

Plaintiff has alleged Fourth Amendment claims arising from an unreasonable search and seizure against the SPD, NHSPD, NHDPP, Barton, John Doe I-III

and Drown (Counts I and III); Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims arising

from the retention, mishandling and/or destruction of seized property against the

SPD, NHSPD, NHDPP, Barton, Buskey, John Doe I-III and Drown (Counts II, IV,

VII and IX); and Fourteenth Amendment claims arising from inadequate notice of

seizure and inadequate pre-deprivation and post-deprivation and post-deprivation

remedies against the SPD, NHDPP, Sanborton Township, Barton Buskey and

Case 1:06-cv-00161-SM Document 25 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 2
Drown (Counts V, VI and VIII). The court shall exercise jurisdiction over his

related supplemental state law claims. All remaining claims are hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

September 5, 2006 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Kevin J. Bean, pro se 

Karen A. Schlitzer, Esq.

Corey M. Belobrow, Esq. 

Case 1:06-cv-00161-SM Document 25 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IMS Health Incorporated, et al.

v. Case No. 06-cv-280-PB

N.H. Attorney General

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 136, Motion for Attorneys Fees 

and Expenses 

Document No. 139, Motion to Extend Time to Respond

Ruling: Upon preliminary review, it is apparent that the fee

request is grossly excessive and that a substantial amount of

effort would be required to determine what portion of the fee

request the court would be prepared to grant. That effort would be

wasted unless the judgment is affirmed on appeal. Accordingly, I

do not intend to rule on the issue until the appeal is resolved.

The motion is denied without prejudice (doc. no. 136). All other

motions pertaining to document number 136 are denied as moot. 

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

District Judge

Date: July 16, 2007

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 141 Filed 07/16/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1652

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the amount of

the earned income credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2001

Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce

the amount of the earned income credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Earned Income Tax

5 Credit Reform Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF EARNED INCOME CREDIT.

7 (a) REPEAL OF CREDIT FOR INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT

8 CHILDREN.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

10 32(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (de-
2

•HR 1652 IH

1 fining eligible individual) is amended to read as fol2 lows:

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘eligible in4 dividual’ means any individual who has a quali5 fying child for the taxable year.’’.

6 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table con7 tained in paragraph (2) of section 32(b) of such

8 Code is amended by striking the item relating to no

9 qualifying children.

10 (b) REDUCTION OF CREDIT PERCENTAGES; IN11 CREASE IN PHASEOUT PERCENTAGES.—Paragraph (1) of

12 section 32(b) of such Code (relating to percentages) is

13 amended to read as follows:

14 ‘‘(1) PERCENTAGES.—The credit percentage

15 and the phaseout percentage shall be determined as

16 follows:

In the case of

an eligible individual with:

The credit percentage

is:

The phaseout percentage is:

1 qualifying

child ............. 18.5 ............................ 16.98

2 or more qualifying children 19.5 ............................ 22.06’’.

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

19 December 31, 2001.

Æ
ASSIGNMENT
                             OF
                     PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     THIS ASSIGNMENT made and entered into this 27th day  of
April,  1999,  by and between AEI FUND MANAGEMENT,  INC.,  a
Minnesota corporation, ("Assignor") and AEI INCOME &  GROWTH
FUND   XXII   LIMITED   PARTNERSHIP,  a  Minnesota   limited
partnership ("Assignee");

     WITNESSETH, that:

      WHEREAS,  on  the  10th day of March,  1999,  Assignor
entered  into Purchase Agreement ("the Agreement") for  that
certain  property  located at 1700  South  Broadway,  Minot,
North  Dakota  (the  "Property") Magnum Video  I,  Inc.,  as
Seller; and

      WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign all of its rights,
title  and  interest  in,  to and  under  the  Agreement  to
Assignee as hereinafter provided;

      NOW, THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other  good
and  valuable  consideration, receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  it is hereby agreed between  the  parties  as
follows:

     1.    Assignor  assigns all of its  rights,  title  and
     interest in, to and under the Agreement to Assignee, to
     have  and  to  hold  the same unto  the  Assignee,  its
     successors and assigns;
     
     2.    Assignee  hereby  assumes all  rights,  promises,
     covenants,   conditions  and  obligations   under   the
     Agreement  to be performed by the Assignor  thereunder,
     and  agrees  to be bound for all of the obligations  of
     Assignor under the Agreement.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged and continue in full force and effect.

AEI FUND MANAGEMENT, INC.
("Assignor")



By: /s/ Robert P Johnson
        Robert P. Johnson, its President


AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 ("Assignee")

BY: AEI FUND MANAGEMENT XXI, INC.



By: /s/ Robert P Johnson
        Robert P. Johnson, its President
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1507 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1507

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify certain 
     franchise operation property as 15-year depreciable property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

  Mr. Ramstad (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Kentucky) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify certain 
     franchise operation property as 15-year depreciable property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Franchise Property 
Recovery Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. CLASS LIFE FOR FRANCHISE OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 168(e)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1996 (classifying certain property as 15-year property) is amended 
by striking ``and'' at the end of the clause (ii), by striking the 
period at the end of clause (iii) and inserting ``, and'', and by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iv) any section 1250 property which is a 
                        franchise operation subject to section 1253.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (B) of section 168(g)(3) of 
such Code is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
subparagraph (E)(iii) in the table contained therein the following new 
item:

        ``(E)(iv)..............................................   15''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to--
            (1) property placed in service on or after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, and
            (2) property placed in service before such date if the 
        taxpayer elects (in such form and manner as the Secretary of 
        the Treasury may prescribe) to have such amendments apply to 
        such property.
                                 <all>
```
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




September 2020


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: February 25, 2021
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Martin HERRERA-BENITEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70921.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*330Submitted March 6, 2003.*

Decided March 10, 2003.

Before T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Martin Herrera-Benitez petitions for review of a final order of removal by the Board of Immigration Appeals issued on March 27, 2002. Herrera-Benitez argues that the Board should have granted a hearing on his request for cancellation of removal because he is statutorily eligible for such relief, having established, among other things, ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A).

We decline to consider whether, as Herrera-Benitez contends, the lack of date, time, and place of hearing rendered the Notice to Appear defective and thus did not stop the accrual of the period of physical presence. The record shows that Herrera-Benitez first appeared before the Immigration Judge for the start of remov*331al proceedings well before the date when he could have met the ten-year requirement. The commencement of removal proceedings stopped the accrual of the period of physical presence. *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 518 (9th Cir.2001) (“Congress did not intend for aliens to circumvent the stop-time rule by accruing the requisite years of continuous physical presence in the United States after deportation proceedings commence.”).

Herrera-Benitez also argues that the BIA violated his due process rights by failing to hold a hearing before depriving him of the right to raise his own children. Because Herrera-Benitez did not raise this claim before the Immigration Judge or the Board, we lack jurisdiction to consider it. *Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 867 (9th Cir.2001). Nonetheless, we note that Herrera-Benitez does not offer any evidence of prejudice, that “the outcome of the proceeding may have been affected by the alleged violation.” *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). Herrera-Benitez admitted to the Immigration Judge that he could not establish physical presence in the United States for ten years before the commencement of proceedings.

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 137

To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made by the National

Endowment for the Arts from funds made available for fiscal year 2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made

by the National Endowment for the Arts from funds

made available for fiscal year 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEALER.

4 Section 319(d) of Public Law 106–291 is amended—

5 (1) by striking paragraph (2), and

6 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as

7 paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.
2

•HR 137 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act and the amendments made by section 1

3 shall take effect on October 1, 2000.

Æ
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 32(a)



                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO




         The undersigned, C. John Wilder, President and Chief Executive of
TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

  1.     The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
         September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

  2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 5th day of November, 2004.




                                      /s/ C. John Wilder
                                ----------------------------------------------
                                Name:     C. John Wilder
                                Title:    President and Chief Executive







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.