alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the
year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             298
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   298
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              441
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (80)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       486 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (481)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1991...... 2.60 .35 .23 1.64 .17 .21 1.66 .51 .32 .10 1992...... 2.69 .35 .25 1.67 .18 .24 1.67 .54 .37 .11 1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 1999: Q3... 2.05 .07 .13 1.47 .19 .19 1.25 .44 .29 .08  Q4... 1.49 .15 .15 .88 .13 .17 .74 .36 .29 .10 

2000: Q1... 1.91 .09 .16 1.36 .13 .16 1.07 .43 .27 .14  Q2... 2.27 .12 .19 1.56 .18 .22 1.28 .54 .33 .11  Q3... 1.86 .09 .15 1.29 .12 .20 1.10 .43 .26 .08  Q4... 1.59 .14 .19 .96 .11 .19 .90 .35 .26 .08 

2001: Q1... 1.63 .12 .17 .97 .14 .23 .84 .37 .30 .11 

 Q2... 2.16 .13 .19 1.34 .16 .34 1.23 .49 .32 .12  Q3... 1.66 .09 .13 1.09 .12 .23 1.00 .36 .23 .08  Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 

2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### Hoa Hong VAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,* Defendant—Appellee.

No. 02-55833.

D.C. No. CV-01-00402-NAJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.**

Decided March 20, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Jo Anne B. Barnhart is substituted for her predecessor, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Hoa Hong Van appeals the district court’s order remanding her claim for social security benefits to the Administrative Law Judge to consider new evidence of her carpal tunnel syndrome. The district court’s order is not final because it remanded Van’s case under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 409(g). *See Melkonyan v. Sullivan,*501 U.S. 89, 97, 102, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991) (indicating that the district court’s intent determines the nature of the remand). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider Van’s appeal.

DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

Summary Calendar

No. 04-51070

_______________________

MICHAEL W. STEEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. L. BROWNLEE, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

W-04-CV-6

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After carefully reviewing the record and briefs, we

AFFIRM the district court for the reasons stated in that court’s

opinion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Huntington Barclay, et al

v. Civil No. 06-cv-368-SM

US Army Corps of Engineers, et al

ORDER ON NONCONFORMING DOCUMENT

IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5.2

DOCUMENT/FILER: #32, Combined Objection and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by

Federal Defendants

DATE: May 18, 2007

The document above fails to comply with: 

LR 7.1(a)(1) Motions, other than those submitted during trial, shall be considered only

if submitted separately from other filings and only if the word ‘’motion’‘

appears in the title. The pleading will be accepted as an Objection to the

Motion for Summary Judgment. A Cross Motion for Summary Judgment

must be filed separately. 

The document will remain on file. Unless a document curing the defect is filed by May 29, 2007,

the original document will be treated as withdrawn and will not be ruled upon by a judicial officer. The

document curing the defect shall be filed in ECF.

No action on the nonconforming motion will be taken until the defect is cured.

Any time periods with regard to this document will run from the date the defect is cured by the

submission of a conforming pleading without further order of the court.

SO ORDERED.

May 21, 2007 ______________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Andrew W. Serell, Esq.

Laural A. Bedig, Esq. 

Matthew R. Johnson, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00368-SM Document 34 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7486

ANTHONY EUGENE BAILEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR FREUND, Medical Agent of the Richmond

City Jail; LIEUTENANT WOMACK, Assistant Supervisor, Medical Agent of the Richmond City

Jail; DOCTOR THOMPKINS, Medical Agent of the

Richmond City Jail; CAPTAIN MINION, Supervisor, Medical Agent of the Richmond City

Jail,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NURSE SMITH; NURSE PARRISH,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-924-2)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Eugene Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Chandra Dore Lantz,

HIRSCHLER, FLEISCHER, WEINBERG, COX & ALLEN, Richmond, Virginia;

Elizabeth Stanulis Skilling, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN,

Richmond, Virginia; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON,

MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Eugene Bailey appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Bailey v. Freund, No. CA97-924-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1999). We deny Bailey’s motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 8:00CR63

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

) MEMORANDUM

CHARLES MARION, ) AND ORDER

)

Defendant. )

On the oral motion of defense counsel, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Marion’s revocation hearing is scheduled to

Friday, May 27, 2005, at 2:30 p.m., before the undersigned United States district

judge, in the Special Proceedings Courtroom, Roman L. Hruska United States

Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska. Since this is a criminal case, the defendant shall be

present unless excused by the court.

DATED this 9th day of May, 2005.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

United States District Judge

8:00-cr-00063-RGK-FG3 Doc # 37 Filed: 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 43
#### Joseph HOLLOWAY v. HUNT TOOL COMPANY et al.

No. 3213.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 28, 1950.

Bass & Brame, Lake Charles, for appellant.

St. 'Clair Adams & Son, New Orleans (P. A. Bienvenu, New Orleans, of counsel), for defendant.

Patin & Patin, Lake Charles, for war-rantor.

DORE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Benoit, Holloway and Anchor Casualty Company v. Hunt Tool Company, La.App., 45 So.2d 512 the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

ELLIS, J. (Reasons given in Benoit case, 45 So.2d 512), dissenting.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-107-01-SM

Travis Blodgett

O R D E R

Defendant Blodgett’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 9). Trial has been rescheduled for the December 

2006 trial period. Defendant Blodgett shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than September 7, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: November 30, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: December 5, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00107-PB Document 10 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

_____________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

August 29, 2006

cc: Richard Foley, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00107-PB Document 10 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2
1:07-cv••00080. M.4ML Docurrer.t 3-2 Filed 04111/2007 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

f

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

V.

Exx0NMOBIL CORPORATION, ETAL.,

Defendants.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE,

Plaintiff,

V.

EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, ETAL,

Defendants.

Civ. No. 1:07-cv- 00060-PB

Civ. No. 1:07-cv-00080-PB

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION

The matter having come before the Court on the State ' s Motion to Consolidate Related

Actions, and the Court having considered the supporting papers,

IT IS this _ day of , 2007,

ORDERED that:

1. The State's Motion to Consolidate Related Actions is Granted;

2. Pursuant to Fed . R. Civ. P. 42(a), the above cases are consolidated for all purposes.

Case 1:07-cv-00080-WES Document 10-2 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv- 00080-MML Document 3-2 Filed 041111/2007 Pc=age 2 o 2

3. Civil case number 1 :07-ev-00060-PB shall be designated as the main case.

Henceforth , these consolidated cases shall be considered as one case and all pleadings

will be filed in the main case and captioned with that case number. The certificate of

service shall indicate copies to all counsel in the main case which shall now include all

counsel in the former related case.

4. The former related case shall be statistically closed.

5. Parties in the former related case will be added to the main case as

consolidated plaintiff/defendants, if applicable.

6. The State shall serve copies of this order on all counsel of record in the main

and former cases.

GuseAYWUnited States District Judge

s/7 /

0 7

Case 1:07-cv-00080-WES Document 10-2 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-45-4-PB

Ricardy Roseaux

O R D E R

On April 10, 2008, defendant appeared for a “probable cause”

hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on six alleged violations of

conditions of supervision. Probation officer Paul Daniel

testified. He established that defendant was found with

convicted felons on two instances. He admitted possession of

cocaine. He was not truthful with probation about his job

contacts, the identities of persons he was with and he has not

been employed since release. I therefore find probable cause to

hold him for a revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee and that

he poses no danger to any other person or to the community. He

has not borne the burden as to danger. He was unemployed, in

possession of $2,000, in a rented car, admitted to handling

Case 1:07-cr-00045-PB Document 127 Filed 04/11/08 Page 1 of 3
2

cocaine, has rented a room in a Concord motel, was stopped by

police in Massachusetts and had a felon in his room. That is

indication of drug dealings, not job hunting in Berlin. He is a

risk of flight and a danger to the community. There are no

conditions which are likely to assure his presence and the safety

of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection 

Case 1:07-cr-00045-PB Document 127 Filed 04/11/08 Page 2 of 3
3

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 11, 2008

cc: David W. Ruoff, Esq.

 Peter E. Papps, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00045-PB Document 127 Filed 04/11/08 Page 3 of 3
#### Vernon THOMAS v. Mart STEWART.

No. 2885.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 10, 1947.

Benj. W. Miller, of Bogalusa, for appellant.

Richardson & Richardson, of Bogalusa, for appellee.

DORE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Ephraim Thomas and Vernon Thomas v. Stewart, La.App., 29 So.2d 604, it is ordered that the judgment be reversed, annulled and set aside, and it is now ordered that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Vernon Thomas, and against defendant, Mart Stewart, in the full and just sum of Five Hundred and Twenty-seven Dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of five per centum per annum from judicial demand until paid, together with all costs. ..
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
DiseasesSpecial Emphasis Panel; The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study 
(MACS).
    Date: October 29, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Eugene R. Baizman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1464, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a6a1f1f0f4a683adaaabeda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c494e1e1f1b496c424544024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy,Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and InfectiousDiseases Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 10, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-21630 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.1


         Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned
President and Chief Executive Officer of Avenue Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                              Cary Brokaw
August 15, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1557 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1557

 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to permit 
   local educational agencies to use funds made available under the 
   innovative education program to support certain community service 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2001

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to permit 
   local educational agencies to use funds made available under the 
   innovative education program to support certain community service 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS.

    Section 6301(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7351(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) community service programs under which qualified 
        school personnel train and mobilize young people to measurably 
        strengthen their communities through nonviolence, 
        responsibility, compassion, respect, and moral courage.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Speed Henry FRY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7403.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1938.

Charles C. Moore, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for petitioner.

Robert H. Jackson, Sewall Key, and Herman Oliphant, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion.

The late Judge MOORMAN joined in conférence decision but died before it could be prepared and announced.