alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.29





 Exhibit 10.29 

THE SYMBOL “[***]” DENOTES PLACES WHERE CERTAIN IDENTIFIED 

INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (i) 

NOT MATERIAL, AND (ii) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE 

COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED 
 This
document is an English translation of a document prepared in German. In preparing this document, an attempt has been made to translate as literally as possible without jeopardizing the overall continuity of the text. Inevitably, however, differences
may occur in translation and if they do, the German text will govern by law. 
 In this translation, German legal concepts are expressed in English
terms and not in their original German terms. The concepts concerned may not be identical to concepts described by the English terms as such terms may be understood under the laws of other jurisdictions. 

Amendment 5 BionTech – Agreement regarding an extension to the lease agreement 

to the lease agreement of 17.08.2011 for commercial premises and the lease of 01.10.2012 for the main area, in addition to the Amendment of 17.02.2012, as
well as Amendment no. 2 of 01.02.2013, Amendment no. 3 of 06.03.2013, Amendment no. 4 of 19.11.2013 and the lease of 30.03.2012 are joined together in this Amendment and consolidated into a combined lease term. 

Agreement no.: ____________________________ of: 10.03.2016 
 The
lease is entered into by and between the following contractual parties: 
 As the Lessor: 

Wolfram Richter 
 Kupferbergterrasse 15, 17-19; 55116 Mainz 
 Tel.: [***]; Fax: [***] 

Lessor’s tax registration number: [***] 
 If the Lessor
exercises the value added tax option, the Lessor’s tax registration number is: [***] 
 As the Lessee: 

BioNTech AG 
 Represented by [***] 

An der Goldgrube 12; 55131 Mainz 
 registered in the Commercial
Register held at Mainz District Court, registration number: HRB 41865 
 for the office space on the property Kupferbergterrasse 15, 17-19; 55116 Mainz, on the second floor of the front building, the third floor of the front building (loft), the second floor of the original building, - second floor of the main building, main area and ancillary
areas. 
 The Parties agree to extend the contractual term by a further three years until 31.03.2019 after expiry of the lease of 17.08.2011, as agreed in
Amendment no. 4 of 19.11.2013, plus the option to extend by another three years; the lease of 30.03.2012 which would end on 30.06.2016 shall also be extended by a further three years to 31.03.2019, plus option. 

The leasehold term is therefore extended for both leases consolidated in this Amendment, to 31.03.2019. 

The leases shall be extended once by three years until 31.03.2022, if one party does not object to the extension by giving six months’ notice in writing.

 All other provisions laid down in the leases of 17.08.2011, in addition to Amendments nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and the lease of 30.03.2012 shall remain in
place and continue to apply without changes. 
 Mainz, on 29.3.2016 

Signature and stamp of the Lessor:         [signature] 

[signature], on 16.3.2016 
 Signature and stamp of the Lessee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Timothy M. Francis, et al

v. Civil No. 06-cv-480-PB

Lindon L. Pulley

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated June 21, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

July 12, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: John J. LaRivee, Esq.

Michael G. Furlong, Esq.

Irvin D. Gordon, Esq.

Kevin M. O’Shea, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 40 Filed 07/12/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Donald Trainor

v. Civil No. 06-cv-485-JM

Paul Scharmann

O R D E R

In accordance with the Order dated June 5, 2007, and no return of service or motion to extend

time to effect service having been filed , the above captioned case is hereby dismissed without

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

June 26, 2007 /s/ James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Gary Lambert, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00485-JM Document 4 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 1
1Defense counsel’s squabbles about Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures

being served three days late, scheduling of depositions by

notice, and lack of understanding of plaintiff’s staff emergency

do not suggest any sensitivity to New Hampshire practice

standards. Counsel are ordered to attempt to resolve discovery

between them before filing any further discovery motions.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kathleen A. Sousa

v. Civil No. 05-cv-421-PB

TD Banknorth Insurance Agency, Inc.

O R D E R

 The defendant’s motion for leave to reply (document no. 37)

is granted. The emergency motion to compel attendance at the

noticed deposition of May 31st (document no. 35) is denied. This

court requires counsel to practice in accordance with the “New

Hampshire Bar Association Litigation Guidelines” which provide in

part: 

In scheduling depositions, reasonable

consideration should be given to

accommodating schedules of opposing counsel

and of the deponent . . . .

(emphasis added). Defense counsel has not done so and will be

afforded no emergency relief.1 

Case 1:05-cv-00421-PB Document 38 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 31, 2006

cc: Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.

 William E. Hannum, III, Esq.

 G. Michael Palladino, Esq.

 Dyana C. Tull, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00421-PB Document 38 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant of § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his/her knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.







/s/           Walter S.
      WoltoszWalter
      S. Woltosz
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              January
      14, 2009/s/           Momoko A.
      BeranMomoko
      A. Beran
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              January
      14, 2009




(A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
LINENS 'N THINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         For the Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                                      March 29,               March 30,
                                                                         1997                    1996
                                                                   ------------------------------------
                                                                                (Unaudited)
<S>                                                                <C>                     <C>         
FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding                                19,706                  19,268
                                                                   ===================       ===================

Net income (loss) applicable to common shares                                  $352                 $(1,786)
                                                                   ===================       ===================

Per-share amounts
          Net income (loss) per share                                            $0.02                  $(0.09)
                                                                   ===================       ===================


PRIMARY

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding                                19,706                  19,268
                                                                   ===================       ===================

Net income (loss) applicable to common shares                                  $352                 $(1,786)
                                                                   ===================       ===================

Per-share amounts
          Net income (loss) per share                                            $0.02                  $(0.09)
                                                                   ===================       ===================


FULLY DILUTED

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
    and fully diluted common share equivalents                               19,784                  19,268
                                                                   ===================       ===================

Net income (loss) applicable to common shares                                  $352                 $(1,786)
                                                                   ===================       ===================

Per-share amounts
          Net income (loss) per share                                            $0.02                  $(0.09)
                                                                   ===================       ===================
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,082
<SECURITIES>                                    25,458
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                       438
<INVENTORY>                                        181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,611
<PP&E>                                           5,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,230
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,175
<SALES>                                         32,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,306
<CGS>                                            5,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                       463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1993...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.5 .5 1.1

1994...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

1995: Q2... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.6 .7 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.6 .6 .9

 Q4... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.7 1.6 2.1 1.0 1.2

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 3.0 1.1 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-97-01/06-SM

Edward Cervantes Arias,

Jose Luis Alsina-Ortiz,

Leslie B. Smith, Allen R. Hall,

Allen R. Bailey and Terri Hodgkins

O R D E R

Defendant Terri Hodgkins’s motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial is granted (document no. 68). Trial has been rescheduled

for the September 2007 trial period. Defendant Hodgkins shall file a waiver of

speedy trial rights not later than May 21, 2007. On the filing of such waiver,

her continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 69 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 11, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Richard N. Foley, Esq.

Jose A. Espinosa, Esq.

Michael Sheehan, Esq.

Clyde R.W.Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 69 Filed 05/11/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.4


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SPECIAL PURPOSE SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT


 


OF


 


ALLIED PHYSICIANS OF CALIFORNIA,


 


A PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CORPORATION


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT
TO SPECIAL PURPOSE SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of September 11, 2019,
MEDICAL CORPORATION doing business as Allied Pacific of California IPA (the “Corporation”), and AP-AMH
MEDICAL CORPORATION, a California professional medical corporation, the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series
A Preferred Stockholder”).


 


A.           The
Corporation and the Series A Preferred Stockholder have previously entered into that certain Special Purpose Shareholder Agreement
dated as of May 10, 2019 (the “Shareholder Agreement”).


 


B.           The
Corporation and the Series A Preferred Stockholder desire to amend the Shareholder Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements, representations, warranties, provisions and covenants herein contained,
the parties hereto, each intending to be bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.          Definitions.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Shareholder Agreement.


 


2.          Recital
A. Recital A of the Shareholder Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


A.           The
Corporation will issue 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Series A Preferred Stockholder pursuant to the Certificate
of Determination of Preferences of Series A Preferred Stock of Allied Physicians of California, A Professional Medical Corporation,
dated September 11, 2019, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto (the “Certificate of Determination”).


 


3.          Exhibit
A. Exhibit A to the Shareholder Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as set forth on Attachment 1
to this Amendment.


 


4.          Effect
of Amendment. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms of the Shareholder Agreement shall remain unchanged
and in full force and effect. The provisions of Article II of the Shareholder Agreement are incorporated in this Amendment by this
reference, mutatis mutandis.


 


[Signatures appear on the following page.]


 




    1


     


    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been executed as of the date first above written.


 


	“Corporation”:	 	“Series A Preferred Stockholder”:
	 	 	 
	ALLIED PHYSICIANS OF CALIFORNIA,  A PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CORPORATION	 	AP-AMH MEDICAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Terry Lee, M.D.	 	By:	/s/ Thomas Lam
	Name: 	Terry Lee, M.D.	 	Name: 	Thomas Lam, M.D.
	Title:	Independent Committee Member	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 




    S-1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mark R. Mandeville

v. Civil No. 05-cv-92-JD

Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, et al.

O R D E R

On June 13, 2006, Attorney John Curran provided the court, in camera, the last known

addresses of defendants Steven Mayo and Don Andrade. Service was again attempted by the United

States Marshal using these addresses. Service was once again returned marked unexecuted. 

Plaintiff Mandeville is advised that without correct addresses the Marshal cannot make

service upon these named defendants. Unless Plaintiff provides the Court with these addresses

within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, the court will otherwise be required to dismiss

these two defendants without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED.

July 20, 2006 _________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Michael Sheehan, Esq.

John Curran, Esq.

Ralph Suozzo, Esq.

W. Kirk Abbott, Esq.

Charles P. Bauer, Esq.

Lisa Lee, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00092-JD Document 45 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Wilfrido S. MACIAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 02-16169.

D.C. No. CV-01-02207-CW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 18, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Wilfrido S. Macias appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant, City and County of San Francisco, in Macias’ action alleging that defendant’s failure to hire him for a security analyst position was discrimination on the basis of national origin and age in violation of Title VII and the Age Discrimination and Employment Act (“ADEA”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Vasquez v. County of L.A.,*307 F.3d 884, 889 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

Summary judgment was proper because after defendant met its burden of providing a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for not hiring Macias, he failed to demonstrate that defendant’s reason was a mere pretext for discrimination. *See Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co.,*26 F.3d 885, 892 (9th Cir.1994) (rejecting plaintiffs claims of discrimination based on national origin and age because plaintiff did not provide evidence rebutting defendant’s legitimate explanation for its actions).

Macias’ remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
PROB 35 Report and Order Terminating Probation/Supervised Release 

(Rev. 5/01) Prior to Original Expiration Date

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Crim. No. 8:23CR00127

Aaron M Pettes

On August 1, 2022 the above named was placed on probation/supervised release for a period of

36 Months. The probationer/supervised releasee has complied with the rules and regulations of probation/supervised

release and is no longer in need of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that the probationer/supervised releasee be

discharged from supervision.

Respectfully submitted,

U.S. Probation Officer

ORDER OF COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the probationer/supervised releasee be discharged from supervision

and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.

Dated this day of , 20 .

Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.

Chief U.S. District Judge

11th April 24

8:23-cr-00127-RFR-SMB Doc # 2 Filed: 04/11/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 22