alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carol Glick, Respondent, v Russell Glick, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 436]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated March 10, 2000, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ross, J.), dated July 8, 2004, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to remove him as the custodian of the children’s custodial accounts and appoint the plaintiff as the custodian of those accounts, and granted the plaintiffs separate motion for an award of an attorney’s fee and awarded the sum of $85,895.34.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The award of a reasonable attorney’s fee is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court *(see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete,*70 NY2d 879 [1987]). Factors to consider in determining whether an award is appropriate, and, if appropriate, the amount to be awarded, are the equities and circumstances of each case, and the relative merits of the parties’ positions and their respective financial circumstances *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; *Tayar v Tayar,*250 AD2d 757 [1998]; *Linda R. v Richard E.,*176 AD2d 312, 313 [1991]). Considering all of the circumstances, including that this litigation resulted from the defendant’s abuse of the parties’ children and that court-ordered therapeutic supervised visitation with the defendant and the children failed three times due to the defendant’s behavior, the court providently exercised its discretion in its award of an attorney’s fee *(see Walker v Walker,*255 AD2d 375, 376 [1998]; *Rados v Rados,*133 AD2d 536 [1987]; *cf. Havell v Islam,*301 AD2d 339, 347 [2002]).

Furthermore, the court properly appointed the plaintiff as the *534custodian of the children’s custodial accounts as she presented evidence that the defendant had misused the accounts.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Santucci and Covello, JJ., concur.
*Release Date: December 31, 2002*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

----

```
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 105  | 12                                     | 25                                                   | 36 | 32 | .319 | .037 | .078 | .103 | .091 |
| 82   | 14                                     | 20                                                   | 29 | 18 | .237 | .039 | .062 | .083 | .050 |
| 54   | 7                                      | 16                                                   | 5 | 26 | .155 | .020 | .049 | .014 | .069 |
| 69   | 10                                     | 11                                                   | 15 | 33 | .187 | .026 | .032 | .037 | .082 |
| 51   | -2                                     | 14                                                   | 13 | 25 | .131 | -.004 | .039 | .032 | .061 |
| 95   | 16                                     | 27                                                   | 24 | 30 | .240 | .039 | .070 | .058 | .071 |
| 93   | 6                                      | 19                                                   | 19 | 50 | .230 | .014 | .049 | .045 | .112 |
| 87   | 4                                      | 15                                                   | 24 | 45 | .198 | .008 | .036 | .051 | .095 |
| 126  | 18                                     | 37                                                   | 35 | 36 | .280 | .040 | .086 | .078 | .080 |
| 108  | 11                                     | 17                                                   | 34 | 45 | .259 | .027 | .041 | .075 | .098 |
| 308  | 67                                     | 53                                                   | 140 | 48 | .656 | .142 | .118 | .294 | .101 |
| n.a. | 40                                     | 50                                                   | 58 | n.a. | n.a. | .085 | .114 | .124 | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

J. Krist Schell

v. Civil No. 06-cv-425-JM

Thomas W. Kent

O R D E R

Defendant moves to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim

(Count III) in the complaint. While the motion was filed

eighteen months after the deadline for motions to dismiss, it was

considered and discussed at the final pretrial on December 9,

2008.

The unjust enrichment claim initially was composed of (1) an

alternative cause of action to two contract claims, and (2) for

appropriation of plaintiff’s interests in Bradley Reed Lumber,

LLC. At the final pretrial, plaintiff’s counsel acknowledged

that a recovery for unjust enrichment is not permitted under New

Hampshire law for matters which are the subject of a contract

between the parties. Plaintiff’s counsel agreed that since the

court had found contracts on the indemnity and on the oral

agreement for return of his capital and expense loans asserted in

Case 1:06-cv-00425-JM Document 79 Filed 12/10/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Counts I & II, then the unjust enrichment claim is limited to any

damages related to plaintiff’s losses for his interest in Bradley

Reed Lumber LLC asserted in Count III.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim

(document no. 72) is granted as to that portion covered by the

Count I contracts and is otherwise denied.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 10, 2008

cc: David A. Strock, Esq.

 Melinda J. Caterine, Esq.

 K. William Clauson, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00425-JM Document 79 Filed 12/10/08 Page 2 of 2
19

A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters 

Percent except as noted 

USDA Farm Production Region 

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA 

Proportion of farm loans 

outstanding, 2004 Q1 survey, 

region share of national 

total 2.9 9.1 27.7 22.2 8.6 4.7 4.6 8.5 5. 3 6.2 

Sample coverage, 2004 Q1 

survey, sample share of total 

regional loans 13.2 2.9 20.7 32.8 18.1 16.5 10. 4 5.0 7.1 26.4 

Avg. loan size, 2004 Q3 survey 

(thousands of dollars) 29.6 12.1 49.1 41.0 148.1 4 2.4 69.3 40.3 28.5 99.9 

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week 

1999: Q4 9.1 9.2 8.8 9.4 8.3 8.8 9.8 9.0 9.5 8.8 

2000: Q1 9.4 9.2 9.2 9.6 8.4 9.8 9.3 10.0 9.8 8.4 

Q2 10.7 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.1 9.1 10.5 10.0 10.1 9.5

Q3 10.5 10.30 10.0 10.3 9.7 9.2 10.5 10.0 10.6 9.7 

Q4 10.7 9.3 9.9 10.1 9.2 9.4 9.2 10.3 10.3 9.8

2001: Q1 9.3 9.1 9.4 9.7 8.4 7.8 9.5 9.0 9.8 8.8 

Q2 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.8 7.4 8.1 8.3 9.2 8.6 7.9 

Q3 8.3 9.8 7.9 8.2 6.3 7.6 8.7 8.8 7.8 7.2 

Q4 6.9 7.9 6.3 7.0 5.2 6.3 8.7 7.6 6.1 5.2 

(.23) (.78) (.38) (.29) (.36) (1.71) (.42) (.79 ) (.33) (.35) 

2002: Q1 6.9 7.8 6.7 7.2 5.2 5.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 4.9 

(.12) (.37) (.26) (.22) (.63) (1.14) (.39) (.45 ) (.26) (.25) 

Q2 6.8 7.4 6.4 7.2 5.0 5.9 7.6 7.5 6.5 5.1 

(.14) (.29) (.27) (.21) (.48) (1.03) (.23) (.34 ) (.36) (.26) 

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.8 5.6 4.4 4.9 6.6 5.3 5.6 4.3 

(.14) (.03) (.51) (.40) (.69) (.68) (.22) (.96) (.36) (.33) 

Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5 

(.35) (.45) (.47) (1.01) (.56) (.62) (.68) (.35 ) (.47) (.62) 

2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6 .1 4.5 

(.15) (.26) (.31) (.73) (.65) (.63) (.54) (.66) (.35) (.40) 

Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5 .7 6.4 5.2 

(.29) (.17) (.37) (.34) (.71) (.63) (.45) (.71) (.36) (.50) 

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5 .5 5.6 4.3 

(.15) (.04) (.49) (.39) (.73) (.69) (.27) (.99) (.35) (.26) 

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2 

(.59) (.22) (.30) (.71) (.54) (.83) (.54) (.58) (.39) (.42) 

2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8 

(.21) (.15) (.44) (.25) (.48) (.64) (.37) (.23) (.37) (.41) 

Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1 

(.19) (.05) (.66) (.32) (.45) (.31) (.57) (.19) (.40) (.24) 

Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9 

(.79) (.14) (.58) (1.15) (.38) (.75) (.41) (.45 ) (.29) (.08) 

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalach ia, SE is Southeast, DL is Delta 

States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain State s, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses ar e standard errors. They are 

calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap pro cedure (resampling of banks) in each region.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces the 22nd meeting of the American Health Information Community Confidentiality, Privacy, & Security Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory                               ( print page 54599)                            Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).                     

# DATES:

October 8, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern Time]. 

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​confidentiality/​*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup Members will continue discussing and evaluating the confidentiality, privacy, and security protections and requirements for participants in electronic health information exchange environments. 

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​cps_​instruct.html*.                 

Dated: September 12, 2008. 

Judith Sparrow, 

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. E8-22031 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | August 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
H. R. 1727

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for consistent treatment

of survivor benefits for public safety officers killed in the line of duty.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Hero Survivor Benefit

Fairness Act of 2001’’.

SEC. 2. CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF SURVIVOR BENEFITS FOR PUBLIC

SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

Subsection (b) of section 1528 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of

1997 (Public Law 105–34) is amended by striking the period and

inserting ‘‘, and to amounts received in taxable years beginning

after December 31, 2001, with respect to individuals dying on

or before December 31, 1996.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
August
22, 2019


 


James
Donnellan


Owner


LVG1


d/b/a
UNDERground Villas & Hotels


94A
Range Road, Windham, NH 03087


 


Termination
of Letter of Intent


 








Mr.
Donnellan:


 








As
we have not been able to reach a definitive agreement for a transaction in a reasonable timeframe, this correspondence serves
to terminate our June 7, 2019 executed Letter of Intent (“LOI”) to purchase 10% of LVG1 equity using 100,000 Series
B Preferred Shares of 2050 Motors, Inc. convertible into 100,000,000 common shares. We continue to desire a reseller relationship
to offer your myriad cannabis products and travel services on our upcoming social network @ www.kanab.club to be launched
later this year. My offer to appoint you to our Advisory Board and to integrate your network of media properties into Kanab’s
forthcoming video streaming launch stands (i.e., dongle unit). If it makes sense for all parties, we can revisit an equity swap
or other capital markets transaction in the future.








 


Respectfully,


 








 


Vikram
Grover


CEO


2050
Motors, Inc.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11436]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of  Vermont (FEMA-1790-DR), dated 09/12/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/21/2008 through 08/12/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         09/12/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/12/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/12/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/12/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*( print page 54881) Addison, Caledonia, Essex, Lamoille,  Orange, Washington, Windsor. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Vermont:  Bennington, Chittenden, Franklin,  Orleans,  Rutland, Windham. New Hampshire:  Coos,  Grafton,  Sullivan. New York:  Essex, Washington. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere:
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and for economic injury is 11436. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-22177 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1696

To expedite the construction of the World War II memorial in the District

of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. STUMP (for himself, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr.

EVANS, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. HYDE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr.

SPENCE, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr.

SKEEN, Mr. REGULA, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. EVERETT, and Ms. LOFGREN)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To expedite the construction of the World War II memorial

in the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1696 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXPEDITED COMMENCEMENT BY AMERICAN

2 BATTLE MONUMENTS COMMISSION OF CON3 STRUCTION OF WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

4 Section 2113 of title 36, United States Code, as

5 added by section 601(a) of the Veterans Millennium

6 Health Care and Benefits Act (Public Law 106–117; 113

7 Stat. 1576), is amended by adding at the end the following

8 new subsection:

9 ‘‘(i) CONGRESSIONAL DIRECTION TO COMMENCE

10 CONSTRUCTION.—(1) The requirements of the National

11 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et

12 seq.), the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et

13 seq.), and all other laws pertaining to the siting and design

14 for the World War II memorial having been met, the Com15 mission shall expeditiously proceed with the construction

16 of the World War II memorial at the dedicated Rainbow

17 Pool site in the District of Columbia.

18 ‘‘(2) The construction of the World War II memorial

19 authorized by paragraph (1) shall be consistent with—

20 ‘‘(A) the final architectural submission made to

21 the Commission of Fine Arts and the National Cap22 ital Planning Commission on June 30, 2000, as sup23 plemented on November 2, 2000; and

24 ‘‘(B) such reasonable construction permit re25 quirements as may be required by the Secretary of
3

•HR 1696 IH

1 the Interior, acting through the National Park Serv2 ice.

3 ‘‘(3) The decision to construct the World War II me4 morial at the dedicated Rainbow Pool site, decisions imple5 menting this subsection, and decisions regarding the de6 sign for the World War II memorial are final and conclu7 sive and shall not be subject to administrative or judicial

8 review.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gregorio Guardarramos-Cepeda

v. Civil No. 05-cv-062-PB

NH State Prison, Warden

ORDER and

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner was ordered to exhaust state remedies and to

advise the court of the status of his state case every ninety

(90) days. He has failed to provide any status report since

September 26, 2006. The stay is lifted and I recommend dismissal

of the petition for inclusion of unexhausted claims.

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within fourteen (14) days of receipt of this notice. 

Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the

right to appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized

Practice of Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir.

1992); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.

1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 2, 2009

cc: Gregorio Guardarramos-Cepeda, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00062-PB Document 15 Filed 12/02/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven Swan

v.

Paul Barbadoro, et al.

Civil No. 06-fp-458

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself from this case.

SO ORDERED.

Date: December 19, 2006

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00458-GZS Document 7 Filed 12/19/06 Page 1 of 1
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2008- CR
- 6258, s t y l ed S t a t e v . A ve ri n A
. W o o d a rd , pe nd i ng i n t he 2 2 6 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Si d L. H arl e p res i d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 15 9- CR IN RE Aver in A. WOODARD Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: March 25, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Marc h 1 6, 20 09 , r e lator Av e ri n A . Wo od ard fi led a p e tit ion fo r wri t of

mand a mus . Re lator c omp la ins of the tr ia l c ourt ’s fa ilure to r ule on va ri ou s pro se motions and a pro se pretria l pe tit ion fo r wri t of

ha be a s c or pu s, a ll r e latin g to t

he c ri min a l pr oc e e din g fo r whic h h e is c ur re ntl y confine d. Howeve r, re lator has be en appointed c ounsel to repr esent him in the criminal procee ding pending in the trial court. A c rimi n al d efendant is not entitled to hy brid repr esentation. See Ro bin so n v . S

tate , 2 40 S.W. 3d

91 9, 92 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 07 ); Pa tri c k v . S tate , 906 S.W .2d 481, 49 8 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 95 ); Gray v. Shipley , 877 S.W .2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1s t Dist.] 1994, orig
. proce eding ). A trial court has no leg al duty to r ule on pro se motions or petit ions filed04
- 09
- 00 15 9- CR

- 2- with reg ard to a

criminal proce eding that the def endant is re prese nted by

counsel in. See Robinson , 240 S.W .3d at 922. Consequently , the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on
re lator ’s va

ri ou s pro se motions and pro se pe tit ion fo r wr it of ha

be a s c or pu s th a t a ll r e late dir e c tly to his criminal proce edi n g p ending in the trial court. The ref ore, w e conc lude that re lator has not shown himsel f entitled to mandamus re lief. Ac cording ly , the petition is denied. T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 2
. 8 ( a )
. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH