alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-046-01-SM

Rayner Herrera

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. 

I find that the government has sustained its burden of

establishing that defendant violated bail by committing a state

crime. While the complainant is now disavowing her statement the

disavowal is not credible. In her own handwriting with an

interpreter and police officer as witness, she wrote that

defendant grabbed her by the neck, hit her with his fist, threw

her to the ground and with his knee on her chest hit her in the

face. She is 5' 1⁄2", 110 pounds. He is at least 60 pounds

heavier. I find that the defendant violated his bail conditions. 

The conditions of release are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

Case 1:06-cr-00046-SM Document 24 Filed 03/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 26, 2007 

cc: Alfred J.T. Rubega, Esq.

 R. Brian Snow, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00046-SM Document 24 Filed 03/26/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of Americ a

V .

Carlos M . Nunez

Case No . 05-cr-136-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Nunez's motion to continue the final pretrial conference an d

trial is granted (document 14) . Trial has been rescheduled for the February

2006 trial period. Defendant Nunez shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than December 5, 2005 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U .S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : January 24, 2005 at 4 :00 p .m.

Jury Selection : February 7, 2006 at 9 :30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00136-SM Document 15 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

November 28, 2005

cc : Joseph Caulfied, Esq .

Robert Kinsella, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Steven Y. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

2

Case 1:05-cr-00136-SM Document 15 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States 

v. Case No. 06-cr-71-01-SM

Elaine Brown and

Edward Brown

ORDER

Re: Document No. 90, Motion for Steven J. McAuliffe to Issue

a Sworn Statement that he is not the Plaintiff or Compensated By the

Plaintiff in this Case

Ruling: Denied. There is no "plaintiff." This is a federal

criminal prosecution, not a civil suit. The Executive Branch of

the government is charged, inter alia, with executing the laws

enacted by the people, acting through their elected representatives

in the Legislative Branch. That function includes prosecuting

alleged violations of the criminal laws of the United States.

United States judges are constitutional officers who serve in the

independent, co-equal Judicial Branch of the United States

Government and, although "paid" by the government, they are

guaranteed independence from the other Branches of the government

by the constitutional provisions providing for life tenure, removal

only by impeachment for cause, and protection from reduction of

compensation while in office. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: January 8, 2007

cc: William Morse, AUSA

Elaine Brown, pro se

Edward Brown, pro se

Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 115 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201194.                

*Title:*                     Marine Terminal Services Agreement between Port of Houston Authority and CMA CGM.                

*Parties:*                     Port of Houston Authority and CMA CGM S.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Erik A. Eriksson, Esq.; General Counsel; Port of Houston Authority; PO Box 2562; Houston, TX 77252-2562.                

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement authorizes Port of Houston Authority to establish discounted rates and preferential berthing rights for CMA CGM vessels calling at the port.                

*Agreement No.:*                     201195.                

*Title:*                     Marine Terminal Services Agreement between Port of Houston Authority and CIA. SudAmericana de Vapores S.A.                

*Parties:*                     Port of Houston Authority and CIA. SudAmericana de Vapores S.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Erik A. Eriksson, Esq.; General Counsel; Port of Houston Authority; PO Box 2562; Houston, TX 77252-2562.                

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement authorizes Port of Houston Authority to establish discounted rates and preferential berthing rights for CIA. SudAmericana de Vapores S.A. vessels calling at the port.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: September 12, 2008.

Karen V. Gregory,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-21757 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 99.1

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covance Inc.
(Covance) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Christopher A. Kuebler, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Covance.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2003

| |                                                                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ CHRISTOPHER A. KUEBLER                                                               
| | Christopher A. Kuebler                                                                   
| | Chairman of the Board
     and Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)

23
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT No. 1


TO


STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


(Under the HyreCar Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive
Plan)


 


This Amendment No. 1
to Stock Option Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made with reference to that certain Stock Option Agreement (the
“Agreement”), by and between HyreCar Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and the
Participant of the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) listed below. Capitalized terms used
herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the potential acceleration of vesting requirements for awards made under the
Plan in the event of a Change in Control; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 5.10 of the Agreement, the Agreement may only be amended by a written instrument signed by the parties.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in exchange for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally
bound hereby, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The
following is inserted at the end of the Section 3.2 of the Agreement titled “Vesting Schedule:”


 


In the event
that a Change in Control occurs, then:


 


(a) any
unvested or unexercisable portion of any Option carrying a right to exercise shall become fully vested and exercisable; and


 


(b) the
restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions and forfeiture conditions applicable to an Option granted under the Plan
shall lapse and such Options shall be deemed fully vested and any performance conditions imposed with respect to such Options shall
be deemed to be fully achieved at target performance levels.


 


2. Acknowledgement.
The parties acknowledge that except for the amendment expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall be unaffected hereby and remain in full force and effect. The parties reaffirm, ratify and confirm
their respective obligations, covenants and agreements under the Agreement.


 


	 	HYRECAR INC.
	 	 
	Date:  ____, 2019	 
	 	

	 	Name: 	
	 	Title:	
	 	 
	 	PARTICIPANT:
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Name:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-14-00510- CV Appellan ts, Noah S. Bu nker, P aul Carrell, Ever ettBrew Hou ston, Jr., W. Andrew B uchhol z, ScottJ. Leighty, Jad L . Davis, and Holly Clau se//Cross-Appellant, Tracy D. Str andh agen

v. Appellee, Tracy D . Strandh agen//Cross-Appellees, Noah S. Bu nker, P aul Carrell, Evere tt Bre w H ouston, Jr., W. Andrew B uchhol z, ScottJ. Leighty, Jad L . Davis, and Holly Clau se F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 353 RD JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 3-0 0281 1, H ONO RAB LE O RLINDA NARANJO , JUDGE P RESIDING O R D E R P ER CURIAM

Cross-appe llant Trac y D. Strandhag en has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss her cross-a ppeal. We g rant the motion and dismiss the cr o s s -a p p ea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) . The appea l filed by appellants Noah S. Bunke r, Paul Carre ll, Evere tt Br ew Houston, J r., W. Andre w Buc hholz, Scott J . L eighty , J ad L . Davis, and Holly Clause will continue. We have amende d the style of the case to ref lect: Noah S. Bunke r, Paul Carrell, Eve rett Brew Houston, Jr., W . Andrew Bucc holz, Scott J. Leighty, Jad L. Davis, and Holly Clause, Appellants v. Tracy D. Strandhagen, Appellee .

I t is so ordered N ovember 18, 2014. Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Elena Katz

v . Civil No. 05-cv-463-JD

Kris A. Menzie, et al.

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated April 6, 2006, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

May 9, 2006 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Elena Katz, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00463-JD Document 6 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Abdulla Moideen KUNJI, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-60821.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Abdulla Moideen Kunji, a native and citizen of India, petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for political asylum and withholding of deportation. Kunji argues that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of past persecution and a well-founded fear of persecution based on his association with the Muslim League.

When, as in this case, the BIA adopts without opinion the IJ’s decision, this court reviews the IJ’s decision. *Mikhael v. I.N.S.,*115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir.1997). Here, the IJ’s determination that Kunji had not shown past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to India was supported by substantial evidence. *See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft,*303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir.2002); *Gomez-Mejia v. I.N.S.,*56 F.3d 700, 702 (5th Cir.1995).

Kunji’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Gary Sydavong

07-cr-09-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

33) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : January 17, 200 8

cc : Mark E . Howard, Esq .

Jennifer C . Davis, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00009-JD Document 34 Filed 01/17/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-mj-074-01

Russell M. Kanning

O R D E R

Defendant has been found guilty of four (4) Class C

misdemeanors. Sentencing has been set for September 6, 2006. 

Detention under these circumstances is not usual. However, at

least twice during open court the defendant stated that he had no

intention of appearing as ordered - even after being advised that

the failure to appear would constitute a federal crime. The

government moved for detention based upon a risk of nonappearance

- according to the defendant a certainty of nonappearance. 

Defendant is ordered detained until sentencing as he is a

risk of nonappearance. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

Case 1:06-mj-00074-JM Document 2 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
2

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 1, 2006

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

 Russell M. Kanning

 U.S. Probation

 U.S. Marshal

Case 1:06-mj-00074-JM Document 2 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0048

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SKY M. LITTLECOYOTE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 20, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 13 2022

05/13/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0048
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S . Campney, Sr .

v . No. 06-fp-353

Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Superintenden t

O R D E R

Petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (document

no . 2) is granted .

This file has been assigned civil number 06-cv-353-SM .

SO ORDERED .

Date : September 21, 200 6

cc : Randy S . Campney, Sr ., pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00353-SM Document 3 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-42-01-SM

Thomas Lavery

O R D E R

Defendant Lavery’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 25). Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2007

trial period. Defendant Lavery shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than February 21, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference/Change of Plea: April 17, 2007 at 

1:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: May 1, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 26 Filed 02/09/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 9, 2007

cc: Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 26 Filed 02/09/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                          68,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  505,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,320,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,087,915
<PP&E>                                       5,753,205
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,728,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,844,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,302,649
<BONDS>                                      3,718,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,364,303
<OTHER-SE>                                  (7,540,733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,844,376
<SALES>                                      3,548,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,548,863
<CGS>                                        2,723,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,723,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             250,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (135,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (135,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (135,609)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 173 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 173

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 
       to allow for the financing of agricultural sales to Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on 
     International Relations, and Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 
       to allow for the financing of agricultural sales to Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TRADE SANCTIONS REFORM AND EXPORT ENHANCEMENT 
              ACT OF 2000.

    Section 908 of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement 
Act of 2000 (section 908 of H.R. 5426, as enacted into law by section 
1(a) of Public Law 106-387, and as contained in the appendix of such 
Public Law) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b);
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Prohibition'' and all that 
                follows through ``(1) In general.--'' and inserting 
                ``In General.--'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as subsection 
                (b) (and conforming the margin accordingly); and
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as subsection 
                (c) (and conforming the margin accordingly);
            (3) in subsection (b) (as redesignated), by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)''; and
            (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated), by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)''.
                                 <all>
```