alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-162-PB

Andre Warren

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

November 6, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize a plea agreement. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from November 6, 2007 to January 8, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:06-cr-00162-PB Document 15 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 24, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to December 18, 2007 at 4:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 24, 2007

cc: Jessica Brown, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00162-PB Document 15 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 2
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41992
          82
          14
          20
          29
          18
          .237
          .039
          .062
          .083
          .0501993
          54
          7
          16
          5
          26
          .155
          .020
          .049
          .014
          .0691994
          69
          10
          11
          15
          33
          .187
          .026
          .032
          .037
          .0821995
          51
          -2
          14
          13
          25
          .131
          -.004
          .039
          .032
          .0611996
          95
          16
          27
          24
          30
          .240
          .039
          .070
          .058
          .0711997
          93
          6
          19
          19
          50
          .230
          .014
          .049
          .045
          .1121998
          87
          4
          15
          24
          45
          .198
          .008
          .036
          .051
          .0951999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          n.a.
          34
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .074
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 30, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-8-01/02-SM

Melissa Allen

Michael Guinier

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 39) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the December 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than September 4, 2007. On the filing of such

waiver, her continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:07-cr-00008-SM Document 40 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: November 20, 2007 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: December 4, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

August 28, 2007 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Jennifer C. Davis, Esq.

 Patrick Richard, Esq.

 Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00008-SM Document 40 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

677 

KA 10-01857 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEAN PIERRE VILLAFANE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County

(Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered July 6, 2010. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30

[2]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not

valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although the

record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and

intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v

Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), we conclude that the valid waiver of the

right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of

the sentence because Supreme Court failed to advise defendant of the

potential periods of incarceration or the potential maximum term of

incarceration (see People v Newman, 21 AD3d 1343; People v McLean, 302

AD2d 934; cf. People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo, 91

NY2d 733, 737), and there was no specific sentence promise at the time

of the waiver (cf. People v Semple, 23 AD3d 1058, 1059, lv denied 6

NY3d 852). Nevertheless, on the merits, we conclude that the sentence

is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 15, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certify that, to their knowledge:

1.

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Broadband, Inc. for the three-month period ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eagle Broadband, Inc.

|                     |                                            
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|Date: April 23, 2007 | /s/ DAVID MICEK                            
|                     | David Micek                                
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |                                            
|Date: April 23, 2007 | /s/ MARK MANN                              
|                     | Mark Mann                                  
|                     | Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22036]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / 
Notices

[[Page 55811]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance; 
Office of Food for Peace; Announcement of Draft Food for Peace Pub. L. 
480 Title II; Program Policies and Proposal Guidelines (FY09); Notice

    Pursuant to the Food for Peace Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 480, as 
amended), notice is hereby given that the Draft Food for Peace Pub. L. 
480 Title II Program Policies and Proposal Guidelines (FY 09) are being 
made available to interested parties for the required thirty (30) day 
comment period.
    The draft guidelines may be found at http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/. Individuals who wish to receive a 
hard copy of these draft guidelines should contact: Office of Food for 
Peace, U.S. Agency for International Development, RRB 7.06-136, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523-7600. Individuals who 
have questions or comments on the draft guidelines should contact both 
Juli Majernik (at the above address, by phone at (202) 712-4088, or by 
e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#08626569626d7a666163487d7b69616c266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc96919d96998e929597bc898f9d9598d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>) and copy AMEX International, Inc., at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef89899f8b808c9caf8e828a978b8cc18c8082"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="771111071318140437161a120f13145914181a">[email protected]</span></a>. The thirty day comment period will begin on the 
date that this announcement is published in the Federal Register.

Dale Skoric,
Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and 
Humanitarian Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-22036 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
September 18, 2008, at 5:30 p.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matter will attend the Closed Meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions as set 
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(8) and (9), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes as duty officer, voted to consider the item 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
September 18, 2008, will be:
    Matters related to the financial markets.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 18, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22246 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-157-1-JD

 06-cr-148-01-JD

Terri Thurlow

O R D E R

On December 10, 2007, defendant appeared for a “probable

cause” hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on one alleged

violation of conditions of supervision. Defendant stipulated to

probable cause on the violations. I therefore find probable

cause to hold her for a revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that she will not flee and that

she poses no danger to any other person or to the community.

Defendant has a history of not “showing up.” When she first met

with the Portsmouth police and confessed to embezzlement from her

94 year old employer and his Alzheimer-inflicted wife, she asked

to be permitted to go home to tell her parents. She was to then

self-surrender within one hour. She fled and was arrested in

North Carolina one year later. She pled, was sentenced and was

permitted to self-surrender to the Bureau of Prisons. She failed

Case 1:06-cr-00148-JD Document 36 Filed 12/17/07 Page 1 of 3
2

to do so. She was sentenced on that charge to be served

consecutively.

Judge DiClerico advised her that she must report to

probation within 72 hours of release. The “sentence” mailed to

her before release stated the same thing. BOP released her in

error. She did not report to probation, but went to live with

Tom Annis who was also wanted on fugitive warrants. She is a

risk of flight. There are no conditions which are likely to

assure her presence. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or her designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

Case 1:06-cr-00148-JD Document 36 Filed 12/17/07 Page 2 of 3
3

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 17, 2007

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

 William E. Morse, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00148-JD Document 36 Filed 12/17/07 Page 3 of 3
#### PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PATENTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, and Corn Products Refining Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees.

No. 6314.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Feb. 10, 1938.

*1019Charles H. Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa., Percival H. Truman and Sherman R. Barnett, both of Chicago, 111., and Hastings, Stockly & Duffy, of Wilmington, Del., for appellant.

Stephen H. Philbin, of New York City, Owen N. Elliott, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After full argument, study of exhaustive briefs, and careful consideration had, we find no error in the court’s reasoning and the conclusion reached. As a restatement of the case would simply be a lengthy opinion by this court and in substance an effort to put in different language what has already been fully and satisfactorily said by the court below in its expansive opinion, 15 F.Supp. 1038, we limit ourselves to affirming the decree below on the court’s opinion.
8:23-cv-00226

8:23-cv-00226-JFB-MDN Doc # 6 Filed: 06/16/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 11
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus MAXINE ANGELA CHONG, a/k/a Tamika Lambert, a/k/a Maxine Chung, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-181-BR; CA-03-485-5-BR) Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: August 18, 2004 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maxine Angela Chong, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Because Chong’s notice of appeal did not comply with Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (2000), we find she is not entitled to the benefit of the mailbox rule. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Maxine Angela Chong seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is mandatory and jurisdictional. See Browder v. Director, Dep’t. of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 267 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). A prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed when submitted to prison officials for mailing in accordance with Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). However, the prisoner must comply with Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (2000) to benefit from this mailbox rule. The district court’s final judgment in this case was entered on November 26, 2003. Chong’s notice of appeal was filed by the district court on February 2, 2004, beyond the sixty-day appeal period. *Because Chong failed to file a timely notice of appeal or move to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal- 3 - period, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

MELISSA HAMMOND, Administrator of the )

Estate of BONNIE L. SUMNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil No. 06-338-JD

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties stipulate

that the pending action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs

and fees.

Defendant United States of America Plaintiff Melissa Hammond,

Administrator of the Estate of 

Bonnie Sumner, 

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO 

United States Attorney

By: /s/ T. David Plourde /s/ Joseph F. McDowell 

T. David Plourde Joseph F. McDowell, Esquire

Assistant U.S. Attorney McDowell & Osburn, PA

NH Bar No. 2044 NH Bar No. 1675

53 Pleasant Street, Fourth Floor 282 River Road

Concord, NH 03301-3904 Manchester, NH 03105-3360

603-225-1552 603-623-9300

david.plourde@usdoj.gov jmcdowell@mcdowell-osborn.com

Dated: 2/11/08 Dated: 12/10/07 

Case 1:06-cv-00338-JD Document 13 Filed 02/11/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2622712
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          252486
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   31573229
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         5658431
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           5833447
<LOANS>                                       70507042
<ALLOWANCE>                                     256165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               116536270
<DEPOSITS>                                    73959517
<SHORT-TERM>                                   5955000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             936478
<LONG-TERM>                                    5245857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25921
<OTHER-SE>                                    30413497
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               116536270
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2701990
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1387413
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 71105
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4160508
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1578166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1890851
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2269657
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    30000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              150171
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1839347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1046282
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1046282
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    405605
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                      9000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                226215
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               256165
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            256165
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ARLA JOHNSON, POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR JANE S. JOHNSON,

SOLE SURVIVING TRUSTEE FOR THE JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST,

Respondent

v.

MIDNIGHT REALTY, LLC,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 814 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.