alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PIERCE et al. v. POLICE JURY OF ST. TAMMANY PARISH.

No. 2891.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 10, 1947.

Rehearing Denied April 23, 1947.

Roland B. Howell, of Baton Rouge, and Chas J. Rivet, of New Orleans, for appellants.

James T. Burns, Dist. Atty., of Coving-ton, for appellee.

Le BLANC, Judge.

The issue presented in this case is the same as was presented in the case of Reeves et al. v. Police Jury of St. Tammany Parish, La.App., 29 So.2d 511. A resolution similar to the one under consideration in that case was adopted on the same day, calling the same kind of election in Ward Five of St. Tammany Parish.

By agreement, the two cases were consolidated for trial in the lower court and also for argument and submission in this court.

For the reasons stated in the opinion this day handed down in the case of Reeves et al. v. Police Jury of St. Tammany Parish, La.App., 29 So.2d 511.

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment herein appealed from be, and the same is hereby reversed, annulled and set aside and it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Oreice Pierce, Rondo Pierce, William Brewton and Louis M. Fitzmorris, and against the defendant, Police Jury of St. Tammany Parish, declaring the resolution adopted by the said Police Jury of St. Tammany Parish on September 19, 1946, calling, ordering and fixing an election for Ward Five of St. Tammany Parish to vote on whether or not alcoholic beverages shall or shall not be sold therein, and any and all other resolu*516tions pertaining to said election to be illegal, null and void, and,

It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said Police Jury of St. Tammany Parish be, and it is hereby enjoined, restrained and prohibited from taking any other steps or proceeding any further under the terms and provisions of the said resolution.

It is further ordered that the defendant pay all costs of this proceeding.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Daniel Carl Hicks

Case No . 07-cr-115-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Hicks' motion to continue the final pretrial conference and tria l

is granted (document 9) . Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2008 trial

period. Defendant Hicks shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

February 4, 2008 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : June 25, 2008 at 10 :00 a .m.

Jury Selection : July 8, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SM Document 10 Filed 01/22/08 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

January 22, 200 8

cc : Jorel Booker, Esq .

Clyde Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:07-cr-00115-SM Document 10 Filed 01/22/08 Page 2 of 2
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1993...... 100.0 80.7 15.8 2.8 .6 .1 ...

1994...... 100.0 85.5 12.3 1.9 .2 .1 .0

1995...... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

1995: Q1... 100.0 81.6 15.3 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 82.0 15.0 2.6 .2 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.8 14.3 2.4 .3 .0 .1

 Q4... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996: Q1... 100.0 78.1 17.4 3.6 .6 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 78.0 17.2 4.0 .6 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .5 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997: Q1... 100.0 79.1 16.7 3.7 .4 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.5 15.8 3.2 .3 ... .1

 Q3... 100.0 81.8 15.2 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998: Q1... 100.0 80.6 16.3 2.8 .1 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
Opinion issued November 25 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00810
- CR

——————————— EX PARTE ROBERT WILLIAM BE RLETH

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 5 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 9519158
- A

MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert William Berleth appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.072 of the T exas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 In his application for writ of habeas corpus, Berleth contends

1 See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A NN
. art. 11.072 (West 2005) (providing for appeal in felony or misdemeanor case in which applicant seeks relief from order or judgment of conviction ordering community supervision).2 that he received ineffective assistanc e of counsel at trial because he did not receive any advice from appointed counsel before his plea, was not properly advised of the consequences of his plea, and was improperly advised by the prosecutor and the visiting judge that his plea for deferred adj udication, “once completed, would be as if it had never happened.” The trial court denied the writ of habeas corpus on March 7, 2014. F indings of fact and conclusions of law were signed on July 22, 2014. In its findings of fact and conclusions of law, t he trial court found that the relief requested by the applicant is barred by laches under Ex parte Perez , 398 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013 ). The notice of appeal from the March 7, 2014
order was not filed until September 22, 2014. Appellant did not f ile a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal. Further, appellant did not respond to a notice of intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction issued by this Court on October 28, 2014. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that i n a criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the trial court entered an appealable order, unless a motion for new trial is filed, in which case a notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2. The notice filed by Berleth was not timely, and he has therefore failed to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction to consider his appeal. See Slayton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 2103 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding a timely filed notice of appeal is essential to vest the co urt of appeals with jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s appeal. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
|   | 1. | the      Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for      the quarterly period ended June 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |   |                       |                                                                                |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   |                       |
| Date:      March 8, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/      KEVIN T. MICHAELS |
|                     |   |   |                       | Kevin      T. MichaelsChief      Financial OfficerPowerwave      Technologies, Inc. |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1351 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1351

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for Government 
   furnished headstones or markers for the marked graves of veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Filner, Mr. 
Simmons, Mr. Shows, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Hill, Mr. Petri, Mr. Luther, Mr. 
 Foley, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Barcia, Mr. Shays, Mr. Olver, Mr. Horn, 
 Mr. Strickland, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Fossella, Mrs. 
 Meek of Florida, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Mascara, Mr. Boehlert, 
Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. LaFalce, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Davis of Florida, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Lampson, Mr. English, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
Camp, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, Mr. Wynn, 
 Ms. Hooley of Oregon, Mr. Frank, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. 
Davis of Illinois, Mr. Coyne, Ms. McKinney, Ms. Carson of Indiana, Mr. 
 Larson of Connecticut, Mrs. Thurman, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. McNulty, 
Mr. Doyle, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Payne, and Mr. Deal of Georgia) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for Government 
   furnished headstones or markers for the marked graves of veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF GOVERNMENT HEADSTONES FOR MARKED GRAVES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2306(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
``appropriate Government headstones or markers at the expense of the 
United States for the unmarked graves of the following:'' and inserting 
``one appropriate Government headstone or marker at the expense of the 
United States, other than for replacement, to mark the grave of the 
following:''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to applications for Government headstones or markers 
received by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for individuals dying on 
or after November 1, 1990.
                                 <all>
```
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2002: Q3... 23 54 23 32 64 3 26 67 7 25 69 6 16 49 

 Q4... 19 58 23 21 70 9 20 74 6 23 73 4 14 50 2003: Q1... 23 53 24 19 73 8 24 71 5 26 72 2 14 46  Q2... 18 65 18 17 78 6 19 75 6 23 71 5 9 63  Q3... 17 61 22 22 65 13 17 78 5 21 71 8 11 60  Q4... 15 58 27 31 59 10 13 80 7 17 76 8 11 54 2004: Q1... 13 56 31 20 71 10 15 73 12 11 71 18 16 50  Q2... 17 60 22 26 64 10 18 73 9 12 74 14 15 63  Q3... 13 60 27 27 64 9 15 79 6 12 66 22 11 58 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2002: Q3... 24 63 13 30 60 10 20 73 7 16 76 9 21 58 

 Q4... 22 66 12 26 58 15 19 75 6 18 76 6 20 64 2003: Q1... 20 67 13 22 69 10 14 84 3 11 85 4 16 67  Q2... 16 66 18 17 70 13 16 79 6 19 75 6 15 69  Q3... 17 72 12 16 65 19 14 81 6 12 85 3 11 76  Q4... 18 68 13 22 62 16 17 80 3 14 84 2 10 76 2004: Q1... 11 70 19 13 75 12 11 83 6 11 86 3 11 72  Q2... 16 68 16 27 60 13 15 81 4 11 85 4 15 70  Q3... 16 61 23 23 61 16 11 84 4 7 83 10 9 64 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2002: Q3... 30 57 13 22 78 0 22 78 0 21 63 16 33 59 

 Q4... 27 53 20 15 69 15 21 71 7 40 53 7 30 50 2003: Q1... 29 53 18 13 75 13 19 75 6 17 67 17 23 55  Q2... 25 60 15 24 71 6 31 63 6 6 78 17 19 71  Q3... 14 71 14 7 80 13 33 60 7 11 74 16 10 81  Q4... 21 74 5 12 82 6 17 78 6 15 75 10 14 82 2004: Q1... 10 81 10 17 61 22 24 71 6 23 68 9 12 76  Q2... 4 92 4 0 89 11 0 94 6 9 86 5 8 84  Q3... 30 61 9 22 67 11 32 63 5 39 57 4 23 69  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                          
                                Estimated volume               Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                             (millions of dollars)                              (percent)
                      ____________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2     Q3      Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                          
1993......    |          24       2      4      7       11      .121      .010      .018     .035     .054
1994......    |          10       1      1      3        6      .048      .003      .003     .013     .026
1995......    |          12       0      3      6        4      .055     -.001      .011     .027     .016
1996......    |           7       0      1      2        4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1      0      3       14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1      3      0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3      5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3      8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9      5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6      5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6      8       14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |        n.a.       1      5      2     n.a.      n.a.      .003      .012     .005     n.a.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2014


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: November 5, 2014
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2001: Q4... 7.9 7.7 7.2

2002: Q1... 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... 7.2 7.2 6.8

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 6.4

 Q4... 6.7 6.6 6.3

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.4 6.1

 Q2... 6.3 6.2 5.9

 Q3... 6.2 6.1 5.7

 Q4... 6.1 6.1 5.7

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2001: Q4... 0.0 0.0 0.0

2002: Q1... 0.0 0.0 0.0

 Q2... 7.7 7.6 7.1

 Q3... 7.5 7.4 6.9

 Q4... 7.2 7.0 6.6

2003: Q1... 7.0 6.9 6.4

 Q2... 6.9 6.8 6.3

 Q3... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 Q4... 6.7 6.6 6.2

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2001: Q4... 0.0 0.0 0.0

2002: Q1... 0.0 0.0 0.0

 Q2... 7.7 7.6 7.1

 Q3... 7.5 7.4 6.9

 Q4... 7.2 7.0 6.6

2003: Q1... 7.0 6.9 6.4

 Q2... 6.9 6.8 6.3

 Q3... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 Q4... 6.7 6.6 6.2

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023060
<NAME> LONE STAR ENERGY PLANT OPERATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,145
<PP&E>                                             127
<DEPRECIATION>                                      61
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,603
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    208
<INCOME-TAX>                                        73
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                135
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2019-1 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  June 17, 2022



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 



---