alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2218]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants
    Phuong Cong La dba United Harbour Logistics, 2023 Johnston Street, 
Los Angeles, CA 90031, Officer: Phuong Cong La, Owner, (Qualifying 
Individual).
    Profes NWFS, Inc. dba New World Freight, System; Cargo Alliance 
Service, 1071 Sneath Lane, San Bruno, CA 94066, Officers: Young S. Sue, 
CFO, (Qualifying Individual), Yeau M. Yoon, President.
    Cargo World LLC, 111-115 Frank E. Rodgers Blvd. C., Ste. 303, 
Harrison, NJ 07029, Officers: Nelson Liu, Member/Manager, (Qualifying 
Individual).
    FedEx Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, 223 Hing Fong Road, 
Kwai Fong Tower 1, Metroplaza, Units 801-10 & 23-25 Level 8, New 
Territories, China, Officer: George E. Clark, President, (Qualifying 
Individual).
    Taurus International Logistics, Inc., dba Taurus International 
Consolidators, 1560 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Ste. 420, Sunrise, FL 
33323, Officers: Carlos Gutierrez, Vice President, (Qualifying 
Individual), Victoria P. Buitano, Director.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants
    Titan International Logistics, LLC, 16905 Keegan Ave., Carson, CA 
90746, Officers: Howard Smith, Member/Manager, (Qualifying Individual), 
Christopher Lemire, Member/Manager.
    JAEMAR International Inc., 5810 Star Lane, Houston, TX 77057, 
Officer: Janette M. Marlowe, President, (Qualifying Individual).
    LQ Logistic Inc., 820 S. Garfield Ave., Ste. 202, Alhambra, CA 
91801, Officers: Eric G. Qian, CEO, (Qualifying Individual), Christin 
Y. Liu, President.
    Unitor Ships Service, Inc., 9400 New Century Drive, Pasadena, TX 
77507, Officers: Craig Toomey, Vice President, (Qualifying Individual), 
Colin P. Hatton, President.

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant
    Bosmak, Inc. dba Ocean Breeze Shipping, 2501 Harford Road, Ste. 
201, Baltimore, MD 21213, Officers: Steve O. Onyilokwu, President, 
(Qualifying Individual), Beatrice O. Onyilokwu, Secretary.

    Dated: February 1, 2008.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-2218 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### Joe Barron “Jo Jo” JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45855.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1972.

R. V. Hebisen, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Bert Graham, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty. and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the sale of heroin; the punishment assessed, twelve years imprisonment.

The indigent appellant, who was represented in the trial court and on this appeal by appointed counsel, was found guilty by the trial court upon his plea of guilty.

The appellant’s counsel has filed a brief concluding that: “The record reflects no reversible error and there are no points of error upon which an appeal can be predicated.”

The record reflects that the appellant and his counsel appeared before the trial court, at which time the appellant was presented with a copy of the appellate brief and he was informed of his right to file a supplemental brief in his own behalf and of his right to the use of a copy of the trial record. The appellant has not filed a brief in his own behalf.

We find a compliance with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969).

The record before us has been examined and we find that the appeal is frivolous.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved 'by the Court.
#### ERDO REALTY, Inc., v. TERRY et al.*

No. 16002.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 4, 1935.

Fred G. Veith, of New Orleans, for appellants.

F. C. Querens, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

*

Rehearing denied Nov. 18, 1935.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by a landlord against a tenant for five months’ rent at the rate of $32.50 per month, or $162.50. A writ of provisional seizure was sued out and the furniture and effects on the leased premises were seized.

Defendants admitted owing the rent, but averred that an agreement had been entered into with plaintiff whereby the arrears would be gradually paid, provided certain noxious odors emanating from a gas pipe located on the leased premises were eliminated, which plaintiff had failed to do, and they, therefore, declined to pay the rent. They also denied the ownership of the furniture seized by plaintiff which they averred belonged to Frederick G. Veith, their attorney.

There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor, as prayed for, and the defendants have appealed.

The evidence fails to establish the agreement relied on by defendants. There is some testimony to the effect that there was an odor of gas or oil on the premises due to the presence of a defective pipe which supplied fuel oil to a heater, but this pipe was repaired after complaint about it was made to the manager of the building. Moreover, defendants continued to occupy their offices during all of the time for which rent is claimed. It is difficult to understand how intolerable odors could emanate from a pipe which was only used to receive fuel for a furnace and did not constantly contain oil. The pipe, when repaired, ought to be odorless. In any event, the alleged agreement upon which this defense is based has not been proved.

As to the right of a landlord to seize the property of third persons found on the leased premises, the landlord’s lien applies to all property found on the premises; not merely that of the lessee. Referring to the lessor’s privilege, Civ. Code, art. 2707, provides that: “This right of pledge affects, not only the movables of the lessee and underlessee, but also those belonging to third persons, when their goods are contained in the house or store, by their own consent, express or implied.”

The property seized was on the premises with the consent of the alleged owner, for he testified that he had loaned the furniture to the defendants; conse.-*737quently, the case of Bettcher Bros. v. Original Swells Aid and Pleasure Club, 18 La. App. 343, 137 So. 756, in which this court construed article 3260, Civ. Code, which exempts the property of a depositor from the landlord’s lien when his property is deposited on the leased premises with the landlord’s consent, has no application. Mr. Veith, the alleged owner of the furniture in the case at bar, has not intervened, and is not a party to this suit.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S. Campney, Sr.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-353-SM

Superintendent, Bare Hill

Correctional Facility

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pro se petitioner Randy S. Campney, Sr. objects (document

no. 12) to my report and recommendation of March 1, 2007

(document no. 10), recommending dismissal of various grounds in

his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings. He

objects to the dismissal of Grounds 1 and 2. Having considered

Campney’s objection and supporting documents, I conclude that the

additional information does not change my recommendation that

Grounds 1 and 2 be dismissed. 

In addition, Campney has filed a response to my order of

March 1, 2007 (document no. 11), ordering him to amend his

petition to demonstrate exhaustion of Ground 10 or to withdraw

that claim and proceed solely on his exhausted claims. By

separate order issued simultaneously herewith, I grant Campney’s

Case 1:06-cv-00353-SM Document 15 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 2
2

request to stay the proceedings and hold his petition in abeyance

pending his exhaustion of state remedies as to Ground 10. 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Committee v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 28, 2007

cc: Randy S. Campney, Sr., pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00353-SM Document 15 Filed 03/28/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALEXZANDRA BLANCO,

Defendant.

8:23MJ251

ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE

DUE PROCESS PROTECTION ACT

This matter came before the Court for Initial Appearance on a Complaint. The government 

was represented by Kim C. Bunjer. The defendant was present and represented by James R. Kozel. 

IT IS ORDERED:

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' 

obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence as required by Brady v. Maryland, 

373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders the United States to do so. Failure to disclose 

exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited 

to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, 

or sanctions by the Court.

DATED: May 4, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ F.A. Gossett

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00117-BCB-RCC Doc # 19 Filed: 05/04/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 45
EX-10.29





 Exhibit 10.29 

THE SYMBOL “[***]” DENOTES PLACES WHERE CERTAIN IDENTIFIED 

INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (i) 

NOT MATERIAL, AND (ii) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE 

COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED 
 This
document is an English translation of a document prepared in German. In preparing this document, an attempt has been made to translate as literally as possible without jeopardizing the overall continuity of the text. Inevitably, however, differences
may occur in translation and if they do, the German text will govern by law. 
 In this translation, German legal concepts are expressed in English
terms and not in their original German terms. The concepts concerned may not be identical to concepts described by the English terms as such terms may be understood under the laws of other jurisdictions. 

Amendment 4 BionTech – Agreement regarding an extension to the lease agreement 

to the lease agreement of 17.08.2011 for commercial premises and the Amendment of 17.02.2012, as well as Amendment no. 2 of 01.02.2013 and Amendment no. 3
of 06.03.2013 
 Agreement no.: ____________________________ of: 19.11.2013 

The lease is entered into by and between the following contractual parties: 

As the Lessor: 
 Wolfram Richter 

Kupferbergterrasse 15, 17-19 

55116 Mainz 
 Tel.: [***]; Fax: [***] 

Lessor tax registration number: [***] 
 If the Lessor exercises
the value added tax option, the Lessor’s tax registration number is: [***] 
 As the Lessee: 

BioNTech AG 
 Represented by the Chair of the Board of Directors
[***] (with German business degree) 
 Hölderlinstraße 8 

D-55131 Mainz 
 registered
in the Commercial Register held at Mainz District Court, registration number: HRB 41865 
 for the office space on the property Kupferbergterrasse 15, 17-19; 55116 Mainz, on the second floor of the front building, the third floor of the front building (loft), the second floor of the original building and the ancillary areas. 

The Parties agree to extend the contractual term by a further two years until 31.03.2016, after expiry of the leasehold as agreed in Amendment no. 3 of
06.03.2013. 
 All other provisions laid down in the lease of 17.08.2011 and Amendments nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall remain in place and continue to apply without
changes. 
  

			
	Mainz, on 10.12.2013	  	
	Signature and stamp of the Lessor:	  	 [Stamp: WOLFRAM RICHTER
 PROPERTY MANAGER

KUPFERBERGTERRASSE 15-19 – 55116 MAINZ

E-MAIL: [***]

	Mainz, on 03.12.13	  	[signature]
		
	Signature and stamp of the Lessee:	  	[signature]


  
 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2725
MAMIE DAUGHETY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusDAVID WAMSLEY; MARYLAND HOMES FOR THE HANDICAPPED; EMERGE INCORPORATED; EMERGE INCORPORATED, Board of Directors, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 2660-AMD) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mamie Daughety, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Edward Tiller, WHITEFORD,TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, Barbara Lee Ayres, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her action alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-17 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Daughety v. Wamsley , No. CA-96-2660-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3358WA

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Bedah Donald Frey, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: September 8, 1998

Filed: September 17, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Bedah Donald Frey appeals the se ntence imposed on him after the district court revoked Frey's supervised release. Because Frey's appeal lacks meri t, we conclude that an e xtended discussion is not warranted. First, the district court lacked authority t o grantFrey the credit he sought for time spent in detention. See United States v
. Wilson , 5 03 U.S. 329, 333-34 (1992) (sentence credit is not awarded by sentencin g court, but by Bureau of Prisons). Second, the district court correctly sentenced Frey. See18 U.S.C. § 3583 (h) (1994); United S tates v. St. John , 92 F.3d 761, 766 (8th Cir. 1996). We affirm the district court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### REINHARDT et al. v. CARNAHAN CREAMERY et al.*

No. 14978.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 26, 1934.

Porteous, Johnson *&*Humphrey, of New Orleans, for appellants Frank E. Carnahan and Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York.

Spearing & McClendon, of New Orleans, for appellants Mr. and Mrs. J. E. Salathe and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

H. W. & H. M. Robinson, of New Orleans, for appellees.

*

Rehearing denied January 7, 1935.

JANVIER, Judge.

Mrs. Louise J. Reinhardt was a guest passenger in the automobile owned by John E. Salathe and operated by Mrs. Salathe when that car came into collision with a truck owned by Frank G. Carnahan and operated by Alex Ellzey within the scope of his employment. The facts of the case have already been discussed by us in the opinion and decree handed down by us this day in the Matter of Mrs. Charles G. Battalora, Jr., et al. v. Carnahan Creamery et al., 157 So. 612, and we find it unnecessary to add anything to what we said in that opinion and decree.

Mrs. Reinhardt in the lower court was awarded $500 and Mr. Reinhardt $88.75 for the expenses to which the community was put.

The evidence justifies the judgment in favor of Mr. Reinhardt, and a careful examination of the testimony concerning the injuries sustained by Mrs. Reinhardt convinces us that the amount awarded her is neither excessive nor inadequate. She received a rather severe wound in the right arm and was also injured about the chest, but her injuries did not prove permanent, except that the wound in the arm left a more or less permanent scar. She remained in bed for more than a week and was to some extent disabled for several weeks more, but we do not believe that her injuries proved serious or extraordinarily painful.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment in favor of Louis J. Reinhardt be and it is affirmed, at the cost of defendants; and it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment in favor of Mrs. Louis J. Reinhardt be and it is affirmed, at the cost of defendants.

Affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

**************************************

Wayne Carter, Toni Cellucci, and *

Stacey Durgin, individually and *

on behalf of all similarly situated *

persons, *

Plaintiffs * Dkt. # 1:07-cv-00023-SM

*

vs. *

*

New Hampshire Department of Health and *

Human Services, Commissioner, *

Defendant. *

**************************************

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE REPLY TO

DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

COME NOW Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, and notify this

Honorable Court pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) that they intend to file a Motion For

Leave To File Reply Memorandum in Response to Defendant’s Objection To Motion For

Attorney Fees.

Respectfully Submitted,

WAYNE CARTER, TONI CELLUCCI,

AND STACEY DURGIN,

PLAINTIFFS

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM Document 48 Filed 05/08/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Through their Attorneys,

NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE

Dated: May 8, 2008 /s/ Bennett B. Mortell

Bennett B. Mortell, Esquire

NH Bar No. 12131

24 Opera House Square, Suite 206

Claremont, NH 03743

(603) 542-8795

bmortell@nhla.org

Christine D. Lavallee, Esquire

NH Bar No. 13057

1361 Elm Street, Suite 307

Manchester, NH 03101-1323

(603) 663-2900

clavallee@nhla.org

DISABILITIES RIGHTS CENTER, INC

Amy B. Messer, Esquire

NH Bar No. 8815

AmyM@drcnh.org

Adrienne C. Mallinson, Esquire

NH Bar No. 17126

AdrienneM@drcnh.org

18 Low Avenue, PO Box 3660

Concord, NH 03302-3660

(603) 228-0432

CERTIFICATION

May 8, 2008

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served this day by ECF

filing, on Defendant’s counsel, Nancy J. Smith and Glenn A. Perlow.

/s/ Bennett B. Mortell

Bennett B. Mortell

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM Document 48 Filed 05/08/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael F. Schmidt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James E. RiesenbachJames E. RiesenbachChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2006/s/ Michael F. SchmidtMichael F. SchmidtExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50449 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN MANUEL CASTOR-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-2153-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Manuel Castor-Lozano concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard Wansker

V.

Target Corporation

Civil No. 06-cv-171-JD

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5 . 2

DOCUMENT/FILER: #Document # 7, Joint List of Mediators, filed by Target Corporation

DATE FILED: June 30, 2006

The document above fails to comply with Local Rule 53 .1(c)(2):

The parties shall within 48 hours conventionally file a list of 5 possible mediators.

It is herewith ordered that the document is stricken, returned herewith to the submitting party, and

must be conventionally refiled .

SO ORDERED.

July 5, 2006 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00171-JD Document 8 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

v. Civil No. 06-cv-7-JM

Gerard Hamanne

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41.1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with 

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

April 5, 2007 /s/ James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Gordon Rehnborg, Jr., Esq.

Christopher Matheson, Esq.

John Barker, Esq.

Paul Michienzie, Esq.

Richard Demerle, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00007-JM Document 16 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 1