alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-23-01-SM

Denis Frigon

O R D E R

Defendant Frigon’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 8). Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008 trial

period. Defendant Frigon shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than 

May 9, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 30, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00023-SM Document 9 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

April 25, 2008

cc: Jessica Brown, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00023-SM Document 9 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robin Rodriguez

v.

U.S. Department of Justice

No. 07-fp-55

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $16.60 is due no later than April

23, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-55-SM.

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 23, 2007

cc: Robin Rodriguez, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00055-SM Document 5 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of StemGen, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John David Walls, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: December 7, 2018BY: /s/ John David WallsJohn David WallsCEO and Chairman of the Board  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 307,038 32,471 49,420 36,045 47,625 92,96Number of loans 13,716 7,740 3,392 1,088 775 59Weighted average maturity (months)1 18.88 13.11 15.34 24.94 25.87 21.6

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 8.03 7.45 8.76 8.50 6.94 9.3

Weighted average risk rating3 2.33 2.45 2.42 2.32 2.34 2.1

Weighted average interest rate4 7.38 7.65 7.62 7.32 7.12 7.3

 Standard error5 .18 .10 .13 .27 .32 .1

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.90 8.33 8.06 7.82 8.00 7.7 25th percentile 6.86 6.88 7.04 6.96 6.25 6.8 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.38 8.28 7.55 7.54 7.25 7.2 Other livestock 7.47 8.35 7.60 7.43 7.95 6.8 Other current operating expenses7 7.40 7.54 7.48 7.33 6.94 7.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.57 7.35 8.04 7.14 8.25 7.0 Farm real estate 7.00 5.56 8.01 6.96 6.13 7.3 Other8 7.52 8.58 8.95 n.a. 7.13 6.7

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 46.15 41.83 41.01 61.62 53.62 38.7 Under commitment 61.13 52.11 60.12 43.52 58.99 67.9 Callable 20.68 14.47 13.26 22.10 10.56 11.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.84 4.70 5.05 10.08 11.15 11.9 Other livestock 7.84 7.63 9.46 7.70 10.91 9.6 Other current operating expenses7 64.66 72.31 69.16 64.07 53.97 62.3

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.09 9.87 11.45 13.31 4.95 2.8 Farm real estate 9.70 .67 1.13 4.83 6.85 10.3 Other8 3.87 4.82 3.75 n.a. 12.17 2.8

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 20.81 7.04 9.93 14.46 23.97 21.7 Other 76.57 85.10 87.30 81.84 70.15 78.2 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Luis Caraballo

v. Case No. 07-cv-172-SM

United States

ORDER

Re: Document No. 1, Motion to Vacate Sentence under 28

U.S.C. § 2255

Ruling: The motion for relief under the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 2255 is denied as the motion, files, and records of the

case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.

The sentence was lawful, jurisdiction is not in doubt, and the

petition does not describe any denial or infringement of

petitioner’s constitutional rights.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: June 18, 2007

cc: Luis Caraballo, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00172-SM Document 3 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Elena Katz, et al.

v. Civil No. 07-cv-383-PB

NH Department of Health

and Human Services, et al.

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: November 30, 2007

cc: Elena Katz, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00383-PB Document 4 Filed 11/30/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. 05-cr-22-01-SM

Marie Colokathis

ORDER

Re: Document No. 48, Assented to Motion to Reduce

Restitution 

Ruling: Denied, without prejudice to refiling, if appropriate.

The sentence imposed the lawful obligation to pay the restitution

ordered. To the extent that obligation is met in the future, or

has been met previously, defendant will satisfy, or she will have

already satisfied, her obligation to make the required restitution.

The sentence ordinarily is not “reduced” to the extent a defendant

either serves the imposed period of incarceration or to the extent

ordered restitution is paid. Certainly defendant is entitled to

credit toward her restitution obligation when she makes (or to the

extent she has in the past) payments. That seems to be a

different matter, unrelated to a reduction in the amount ordered to

be paid as restitution.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: June 26, 2006

cc: Brian Tucker, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation 

US District Court, Financial Administrator

Case 1:05-cr-00022-SM Document 49 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 1
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, February 3-7, 2Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated 

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 712,368 16,126 73,115 313,630 205,589 53,868 30,744 

Number of loans 15,107 317 1,432 6,364 4,801 992 628 

Weighted average maturity (months)1 14.44 7.74 30.70 12.12 11.96 8.33 15.58 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 3.11 5.06 12.28 2.59 .98 .44 2.93 

Weighted average risk rating3 3.31 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate 4 4.95 5.27 5.72 4.74 4.95 5.11 4.01 

 Standard error5 .30 .31 .26 .44 .35 .45 .37 

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 6.17 6.50 7.20 6.00 5.61 6.18 4.33 

 25th percentile 3.80 3.56 4.34 3.30 4.32 3.24 3.39 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.77 5.36 5.29 4.43 4.56 5.86 3.51 

 Other livestock 4.22 3.66 5.10 3.98 4.41 5.89 4.76 

 Other current operating expenses7 5.42 5.48 5.98 5.45 5.36 4.88 4.09 

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.09 7.25 7.03 4.85 4.89 4.73 7.29 

 Farm real estate 5.57 n.a. 6.08 5.58 6.03 7.12 3.95 

 Other8 4.36 6.67 4.94 4.11 4.50 5.48 3.95 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 84.96 39.88 55.54 86.01 94.15 96.77 91.32 

 Under commitment 84.52 93.24 64.69 84.15 89.86 94.62 93.51 

 Callable 16.01 48.07 42.97 13.04 8.81 2.42 3.61 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 15.91 16.59 33.69 14.85 15.98 6.91 .56 

 Other livestock 7.86 18.43 3.04 11.09 6.25 4.96 .13 

 Other current operating expenses7 43.23 53.01 46.21 37.54 44.86 69.28 22.31 

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.08 .48 3.96 7.24 7.59 .48 .69 

 Farm real estate 3.28 38.20 11.19 1.31 .01 7.05 3.68 

 Other8 23.64 11.48 4.69 26.66 23.33 18.34 63.95 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 8.85 7.53 24.98 5.75 7.46 6.76 13.05 

 Other 85.72 84.58 67.23 87.48 88.98 91.91 83.05 

 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

WARREN B. RUDMAN U.S. COURTHOUSE

55 PLEASANT STREET

CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-3941

Office of the Clerk Telephone 

 James R. Starr 603-225-1423

 Clerk

May 6, 2008

In re: Case No. 08-cv-96-PB, Taber-McCarthy v. McCarthy

To: Clerk, Hillsborough Superior Court

Formerly your case #(s): 06-M-0096

By Court order, the above case was remanded to your court. We enclose a certified copy

of the order and docket entries.

Counsel/pro se parties are herewith notified by copy of this letter that no pleadings (or

copies of pleadings) filed in our court are being sent to the Superior Court. If there are

outstanding issues which counsel/pro se parties wish the Superior Court to consider, copies of

such pleadings shall be refiled with the Superior Court Clerk.

Orders of remand are not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except in certain civil rights

cases. See 28 USC 1447(d), 1443.

JAMES R. STARR

CLERK

Enclosures

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 10 Filed 05/06/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1840 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1840

    To extend eligibility for refugee status of unmarried sons and 
               daughters of certain Vietnamese refugees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2001

  Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Smith of New 
  Jersey, Mr. Rohrabacher, and Ms. Sanchez) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend eligibility for refugee status of unmarried sons and 
               daughters of certain Vietnamese refugees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR REFUGEE STATUS.

    Section 255 of the Admiral James W. Nance and Meg Donovan Foreign 
Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001 (section 255 of 
division A of H.R. 3427, as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(7) of 
Public Law 106-113, appendix G; 113 Stat. 1501A-460) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``and 2001,'' and 
        inserting ``2001, 2002, and 2003,'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)(B), by striking ``except as 
        provided in subsection (d), on or after April 1, 1995,''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (d).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.90  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
  AUTOBYTEL INC. 2006 INDUCEMENT STOCK OPTION PLAN
 
 This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to the Autobytel Inc. 2006 Inducement Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) dated as of May 15, 2009, is adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Autobytel Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan.
 
 Effective as of the date hereof, the Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.4 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
  “6.4  Limitations on Exercise of Options.  Notwithstanding anything contained in this Plan to the contrary, Options shall be exercisable in full or in such equal or unequal installments as the Administrator shall determine; provided that if a Participant
does not purchase all of the Shares which the Participant is entitled to purchase on a certain date or within an established installment period, the Participant’s right to purchase any unpurchased Shares shall continue during the Option Term (taking into account any early termination of such Option Term which may be provided for under this Plan).”
 
 Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as in existence on the date hereof, and any reference to the Plan shall mean the Plan as amended hereby.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
  AUTOBYTEL INC.
 
 
 
 By: /s/ Glenn E. Fuller
 Glenn E. Fuller
 Its: Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and
 Administrative Officer and Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-97-01-03/06-SM

Edward Cervantes Arias,

Leslie B. Smith, Allen R. Hall,

Allen R. Bailey and Terri Hodgkins

O R D E R

Defendant Terri Hodgkins’s motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial is granted (document no. 74). Defendant Hodgkins has

filed a waiver of speedy trial. Trial has been rescheduled for the December 

2007 trial period. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: November 26, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: December 4, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 76 Filed 08/27/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

August 27, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Richard N. Foley, Esq.

Jose A. Espinosa, Esq.

Michael Sheehan, Esq.

Clyde R.W.Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 76 Filed 08/27/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the  three-month  period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David Weisman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  January 18, 2005

/s/ David A. Weisman
-------------------------------------------------------------------
David A. Weisman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; T32 Institutional Training Grant Applications Review.                     

*Date:*                         November 6, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369,                         *lgunzera@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: September 17, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-22295 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Warren E. Peterson

v. Civil No. 06-cv-424-SM

New Hampshire Supreme Court, Clerk, et al.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The plaintiff has failed to pay the necessary filing fee as

ordered in the Court’s order dated November 30, 2006 (document

no. 4). The plaintiff was placed on notice that in the event he

failed to pay the fee, the case would be referred to a judicial

officer for dismissal without prejudice. 

The plaintiff failed to meet the deadline set forth in the

Court’s order. It is recommended that this case be dismissed

without prejudice. LR 4.4. Any objections to this report and

recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days of receipt of

this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified

time waives the right to appeal the district court’s order. See

Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 

Case 1:06-cv-00424-SM Document 9 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 2
13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. Valecia-Copete, 792 F.2d

4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 11, 2007

cc: Warren E. Peterson, pro se

 New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

Case 1:06-cv-00424-SM Document 9 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

l0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137364 & (17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137364 COA: 286303 Isabella CC: 07-000039-FC THOMAS DANIEL BABB, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 8, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is

DENIED.