alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Shawn Cheever

v. Civil No. 06-cv-351-JM

Michael Edmark et al.

J U D G M E N T

In accordance with court’s orders dated September 4, 2009, and September 24, 2009,

signed by Magistrate Judge James Muirhead; and the plaintiff’s verdict returned on September

18, 2009, as follows:

In the case of Shawn Cheever v. Michael Edmark: Judgment for the plaintiff in the

amount of $40,000.00;

In the case of Shawn Cheever v. Kevin Valenti: Judgment for the plaintiff in the

amount of $40,000.00; 

with interest thereon at the rate of .40 percent as provided by law and costs of the

action, if appropriate, judgment is hereby entered.

By the Court,

 /s/ James R. Starr

James R. Starr, Clerk

September 24, 2009

cc: Michael Sheehan, Esq.

James Kennedy, Esq.

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00351-JM Document 49 Filed 09/24/2009 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     APPENDIX A TO ITEM 601(C) OF REGULATION S-K 
     COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
     ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                         15,847
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   294,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              346,404
<PP&E>                                        226,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 62,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                536,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         203,548
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          390
<OTHER-SE>                                    298,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  536,863
<SALES>                                       718,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              718,773
<CGS>                                         435,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 258,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                24,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                    9,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.38
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

   To amend the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 to make leaf 
      tobacco an eligible commodity for the Market Access Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

Mr. Etheridge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 to make leaf 
      tobacco an eligible commodity for the Market Access Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1302(b)(3) 
of the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 (7 U.S.C. 5623 note) is 
amended by inserting ``, other than leaf tobacco'' after ``tobacco''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. No. 06-fp-479

New Hampshire Department of Corrections, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $20.00 is due no later than

February 15, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-479-PB.

SO ORDERED.

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 10, 2007

cc: William J. Carey, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:06-cv-00479-PB Document 11 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wlnfteb $tateg**~ourt** 

# of 

# §ppeaIg fortbejfeberaI**~frcuft** BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG, Plaintiff-Appellant, 

### v. DOWAGROSCIENCES LLC, Defendant-Appellee. 2013-1002 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofDelaware in case no. 10-CV-1045, Judge Renee Marie Bumb. 

### ON MOTION ORDER Bayer CropScience AG moves to reform the caption to indicate that Dow Agrosciences LLC is an appellee. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 13-1002 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 10/25/2012BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC 2 The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s25 Case: 13-1002 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 10/25/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

MARVEL JONES,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MADISON COUNTY, a political 

subdivision, et al.

Defendants.

8:23-CV-182

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1. On the Court's own motion, the deadline for completing 

service of process is extended to January 8, 2024.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall set a case management deadline 

for January 8, 2024. 

3. Filings 21 through 27 are stricken. 

Dated this 7th day of December, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

John M. Gerrard

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 28 Filed: 12/07/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 330
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joshua M . Colbath

V .

Lakes Region FacilitV, Warden

No . 06-fp-35 0

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-350-SM .

SO ORDERED .

Date : September 19, 2006

ambvs R . Muirhead

ed States Magistrate Judge

cc : Joshua M . Colbath, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00350-SM Document 3 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 79

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2001

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,   That Public Law 107-44 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``January 10, 2002''; and by striking the 
date specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu thereof ``January 
1, 2002''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,376,246
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      64,089
<MORTGAGE>                                     236,644
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    4,495
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,864,129
<CASH>                                           1,437
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,808
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         164,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,412,047
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,021,234
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   6,009
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           60,078
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 79,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           86,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,156
<OTHER-SE>                                     480,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,412,047
<PREMIUMS>                                      18,205
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             48,548
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,259
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,613
<BENEFITS>                                      44,374
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      5,057
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            14,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,739
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,580
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel W. Miles, George Hamacher,

Nancy Tavernier

v. Civil No. 05-cv-56-JM

W. John Funk, Michael Ramsdell,

Gallagher, Callahan & Gartrell, P.A.

O R D E R

Having considered the additional memorandums submitted on

the Defendants’ motion to compel, the Court has reconsidered its

March 10, 2006 Order as it pertains to the Defendants’ motion to

compel discovery in response to their Interrogatory No. 3 and

Request for Production No. C. The Court finds that the

Defendants have demonstrated sufficiently that the discovery

requested is relevant to the issue of the Plaintiffs’ ability to

fund litigation and/or to the possible bias of Ms. Clarice

Neumann as a witness in this case. The Court further finds that

the Plaintiffs have not shown that the discovery requested is

protected by the attorney-client privilege. See Chaudry v.

Gallerizzo, 174 F.3d 394, 402 (4th Cir. 1999) (“Typically, the

attorney-client privilege does not extend to billing records and

expense reports.”); Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States,

Case 1:05-cv-00056-JM Document 45 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

125 F.3d 79, 86 (2d Cir. 1997) (absent special circumstances, a

client’s identity and fee information are not privileged); Clarke

v. Am. Commerce Nat. Bank, 974 F.2d 127, 129 (9th Cir. 1992) (the

identity of the client, the amount of the fee, the identification

of payment by case file name, and the general purpose of the work

performed are usually not protected from disclosure by the

attorney-client privilege). Therefore, the Court grants

Defendants’ motion to compel (document no. 18) as to Defendants’

Interrogatory No. 3 and Request for Production No. C. Compliance

is due in ten (10) business days. LR 37.1(b).

Although the Court has reconsidered its ruling on the second

half of the Defendants’ motion to compel, the Court finds that an

award of fees or costs is not justified under the circumstances. 

Therefore, the Court will not make an award of reasonable

expenses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(4).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 31, 2006

cc: Evan M. Fray-Witzer, Esq.

Russell F. Hilliard, Esq.

Michael C. McLaughlin, Esq. 

Case 1:05-cv-00056-JM Document 45 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21858]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY (NCD)


Sunshine Act Meetings

Type: Quarterly Meeting.

Dates And Times: 
October 6, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
October 7, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
October 8, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m.

Location: Hyatt Regency Crown Center, 2345 McGee Street, Kansas City, 
Missouri.

Status: 
October 6, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.--Open.
October 7, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.--Open.
October 7, 2008, 4:00 p.m.-5 p.m.--Closed Executive Session.
October 8, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m.--Open.

Agenda: Public Comment Sessions; Discussions on Emergency Preparedness, 
Vocational Rehabilitation, Veterans, Healthcare; NCD's Progress Report, 
Reports from the Chairperson, Council Members, and the Executive 
Director; Unfinished Business; New Business; Announcements; 
Adjournment.

Sunshine Act Meeting Contact: Mark S. Quigley, Director of External 
Affairs, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-
272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax).

Accommodations: Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify 
NCD immediately.

    Dated: September 10, 2008.
Michael C. Collins,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E8-21858 Filed 9-15-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens ‘n ThingsCenter, Inc. for the quarterly period endedJuly 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Robert J. DiNicola, as Chief Executive Officer of Linens‘n Things Center, Inc., and Francis M.Rowan, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Linens‘n Things Center, Inc.

 
| /s/ Robert J. DiNicola |       |                      |
|------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
| **Name:**              | ** ** | Robert J. DiNicola        |   |   |
| **Title:**             | ** ** | Chairman and Chief        |   |   |
|                   |       | Executive Officer         |   |   |
| **Date:**              | ** ** | August 15, 2006           |   |   |
| ** **             | ** ** |                      |   |   |
| ** **             | ** ** |                      |   |   |
| /s/ Francis M.  Rowan  |       |                      |
| **Name:**              | ** ** | Francis M. Rowan          |   |   |
| **Title:**             | ** ** | Senior Vice President and |   |   |
|                   |       | Chief Financial Officer   |   |   |
| **Date:**              | ** ** | August 15, 2006           |   |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 07-cv-60-JD

ExxonMobil Corporation, et al.

O R D E R

The undersigned recuses himself from presiding over this

case. The case shall be assigned to another judge.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

April 19, 2007

cc: Jeffrey K. Sands, Esquire

Case 1:07-cv-00060-WES Document 8 Filed 04/19/07 Page 1 of 1
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f o ll owi n g o r

der :

A1 8 A1 07 9 . LULE v

. THE STATE.
Up o n co n s id erat i o n o f A p p el l an t ’ s Req u es t fo r Ch an g e o f V e n u e, wh i ch we

c o n s t ru e as a m ot i o n to t ran s fer to t h e Su prem e Co u rt , th e m o t i o n i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## February 15, 2018

02/15/2018
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.02




395 Page Mill Road, Building 3 | Palo Alto, CA 94304


Amendment
to
Employment Offer Letter


July 31, 2019


Arun C. Murthy
517A Porpoise Bay Terrace
Sunnyvale CA 94089
                
Dear Arun:


You previously entered into an employment offer letter with Cloudera (the “Company”), dated on or about December 31, 2018 (the “Offer Letter”).  This letter amends the Offer Letter (the “Amendment”), effective as of the date that this Amendment is signed by both you and the Company.  
You and the Company agree that the final sentence of the second paragraph Section 3(c) of the Offer Letter is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


“The remaining 20% of the Retention RSUs will vest 50% on December 15, 2019 and 50% on December 15, 2020 subject to your continued employment through such dates.”
Any capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Offer Letter.  Except as specifically set forth above, all terms and conditions of the Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect.  In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions of the Offer Letter and this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern.  




AGREED AND ACCEPTED        CLOUDERA, INC.


/s/ Arun C. Murthy                    /s/ David Middler        
Arun C. Murthy        David Middler 
General Counsel
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Graham

v. Civil No. 06-cv-453-JD

New Hampshire State Prison, Warden, et al.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff moved for injunctive relief (document no. 15). 

The motion was referred to me for a report and recommendation. 

Discussion

Plaintiff claims that defendants Sweeney and Conner

assaulted him. He has provided no factual allegations and no

affidavit to support this conclusory statement. He is ordered to

supplement paragraph 1 with a detailed factual affidavit within

ten (10) business days or I will recommend denial of this part of

the motion. 

The second allegation is that defendant Valente threatened

to punch him. I recommend that the request be denied as to

Valente. Even if proved the allegation is insufficient to permit

the requested relief. Mere threats, without any physical injury

does not invoke Constitutional Protection. See Doe v. Magnusson,

2005 WL 758454, at *15 (D. Me. 2005)(collecting cases); Ellis v.

Case 1:06-cv-00453-JD Document 17 Filed 04/04/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Meade, 887 F. Supp. 324, 329 (D. Me. 1995); and Shabazz v. Cole,

69 F. Supp. 2d 177, 198-201 (D. Mass. 1999). 

I recommend denial of the motion against Valente and defer

recommendation as to Sweeney and Conner. 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 4, 2007

cc: Laura E.B. Lombardi, Esq.

 William Graham, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00453-JD Document 17 Filed 04/04/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael F. Schmidt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ James E. RiesenbachJames E. RiesenbachChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006




/s/ Michael F. SchmidtMichael F. SchmidtExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Richard Darnell Amos, * From the 32nd District Court

of Nolan County,

Trial Court No. 12366.

Vs. No. 11-19-00054-CR * February 4, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.