alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ECHELON INTERNATIONAL FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,100
<SECURITIES>                                    23,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,700
<PP&E>                                         182,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 464,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,300
<BONDS>                                         72,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   464,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,600)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

# FILED
April 21, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ Summary Calendar No. 04-51070

_______________________ MICHAEL W. STEEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. L. BROWNLEE, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

W-04-CV-6

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### After carefully reviewing the record and briefs, we

AFFIRM the district court for the reasons stated in that court’s
opinion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Albert Kuperman

v. 06-cv-420-JD

NH Department of Corrections, et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated February 13, 2007, for the reasons stated therein, no objection

having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

March 14, 2007 /s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Nancy Tierney, Esq.

Andrew Livernois, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00420-JL Document 8 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 1
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0780

_____________________________
I NTERNATIONAL B ONDED C OURIERS , I NC

. , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF R EVENUE , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings

. John G. Van Laningham
, Administrative Law Judge

. June 6, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jeanette Moffa, Joseph C. Moffa , Jonathan W. Taylor, and James F. McAuley of Moffa, Sutton, & Donnini, P.A., Fort Lauderdale
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Timothy E. Dennis, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Jacek P. Stramski, Special Counsel, Tallahassee
, for App ellee.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,810]


B.G. Sulzle, Inc., Currently Known as Angiotech America, Inc., 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Contemporary Personnel Services 
(CPS) and Staffworks, North Syracuse, NY; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative 
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on August 7, 2007, applicable to workers of B.G. 
Sulzle, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Contemporary 
Personnel Services and Staffworks, North Syracuse, New York. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on August 27, 2007 (72 FR 49024).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in employment related to the production of stainless steel surgical 
needles.
    New information shows that on March 22, 2006, Angiotech America, 
Inc. purchased B.G. Sulzle, Inc. and is currently known as Angiotech 
America, Inc. Workers wages at the subject firm are being reported 
under a separate Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Angiotech 
America, Inc.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,810 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of B.G. Sulzle, Inc., currently known as Angiotech 
America, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Contemporary 
Personnel Services (CPS) and Staffworks, North Syracuse, New York, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after July 9, 2006, through August 7, 2009, are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974, and are also eligible for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of September 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-22121 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         803,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,203,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (31,573)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,128,480
<PP&E>                                       4,987,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                (573,509)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,334,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,443,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,877,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,334,236
<SALES>                                        820,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               820,066
<CGS>                                          982,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  982,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,077,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,033,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                   353,952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,679,341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,679,341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CRISTIAN DAVID CARMONA QUINONEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-752

[August 19, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-

008209CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.          Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2019-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.          Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.          Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.          Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in thisreport on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 

 

 

 

March 30,2023
#### Ronald E. BOSCAINO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-56235.

D.C. No. CV-00-00028-DOC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

*727Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Ronald E. Boscaino appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U. S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his convictions for first-degree murder, attempted murder, kidnapping for robbery, first and second degree robbery, first degree burglary, and grand theft auto. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, *see Miles v. Prunty,*187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), and we vacate and remand.

Boscaino contends that the district court erroneously concluded that he was not entitled to statutory tolling for the thirteen-month period between the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s denial of his habeas petition and the filing of another habeas petition in the California Court of Appeal. This argument may have merit. First, the California Court of Appeal’s citation to a section of *In re Clark*(1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 769, 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 509, 855 P.2d 729, addressing successive petitions, did not signify that Boscaino failed to justify substantial defy in presenting his claims. Moreover, at the time of its order, the district court did not have the benefit of our decision in *Saffold v. Carey,*312 F.3d 1031, 1035-36 (9th Cir.2002), where we concluded that under certain circumstances, petitioner is entitled to statutory tolling. Accordingly, we vacate and remand so that the district court may reconsider its determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Carey v. Saffold,*536 U.S. 214, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (2002), and this court’s decision on remand in *Saffold v. Carey,*312 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2002).

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Resource Mana2ement Company

v. Civil No. 06-cv-366-JD

Frank Gregory

ORDE R

On September 18, 2007, Defendant Gregoryfiled a Motion to Stay Case Pending Substitution

of Deceased Party Defendant. The Motion was granted by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead,

allowing a stay of the case for 90 days to permit substitution of a representative of the estate for the

decedent.

Therefore, trial and related trial deadlines are herewith continued and will be rescheduled if

necessary after ruling on the current and future dispositive motions .

SO ORDERED.

October 9, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Resource Management Company

Douglas N. Gould, Esq.

Joshua Menard, Esq .

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 110 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of alpha-En Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Steven M. Payne, President, and Jerome
I. Feldman, Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




May
      24, 2010
            /s/ Steven M.
      Payne
              Steven
      M. Payne
              PresidentMay
      24, 2010
            /s/ Jerome I.
      Feldman
              Jerome
      I. Feldman
              Chairman,
      Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JOR DAN GER

ALD LEE JAC KSON, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-30032

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-00067-SEH M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Sam E. Ha ddon, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 17, 2013 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, WALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. Jorda n Ge ra ld Le e Ja c kson a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 30-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for a ssa ult re sulting in se

rious bodily

injury , in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 1153 a nd 113(a )(6). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED

D EC 30 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Ja c kson c o nte nds tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d by fa iling to me aningfully c onside r the 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte nc ing fa c tors, ba sing its sente nc e on infe re n c e s not supporte d by the re c ord, a

nd fa iling to me aningfully c onside r and a ddre s s Ja c kson’ s individual c irc um sta nc e s or his a

rgum e nt tha

t his c rim ina l history is ove rre pre se nte d. The c ourt did not proc e dura lly e rr, Unite d State

s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba nc ), and Ja c kson’ s withinGuide line s se nte nc e is substa nt ive ly re a sona ble in light of the

se c tion 3553(a

) se nte nc ing fa c t ors a

nd tota lity

of the c irc um sta

nc e s, inc l uding Ja c kson’ s c rim ina l and substa

nc e a buse history

and the se riousne ss of the insta nt offe nse . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 3 0 0 3 2 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Charles Wolff

v. 06-cv-321-PB

NH Department of Corrections

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated October 17, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

October 30, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Charles Wolff, Pro Se

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 73 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1145

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to

assure that the full amount deposited in the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund is spent for the purposes for which that Fund was established.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 2001

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself, Mr. SHERWOOD, Ms. HART, and Mr. KUCINICH)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act

of 1977 to assure that the full amount deposited in

the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund is spent for the

purposes for which that Fund was established.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FROM ABANDONED

4 MINE RECLAMATION FUND.

5 Section 401(d) of the Surface Mining Control and

6 Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231(d)) is amended

7 to read as follows:
2

•HR 1145 IH

1 ‘‘(d) Moneys in the fund shall be available for the

2 purposes of this title without further appropriation and

3 without fiscal year limitation.’’.

Æ
NUMBER 13-21-00267-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

SONIA BEARD WHITAKER, Appellant,

v.

HAZEL GUILLEN, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court of

of Matagorda County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Before the court is appellant’s motion for free appellate record. We now ABATE 

this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon 

remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, 

thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. Whether appellant is indigent;
2

2. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to indigency; and

3. Whether appellant has been provided a complete copy of the appellate record.

If the trial court determines that appellant is indigent and entitled to a free appellate 

record, the trial court shall make any orders necessary to ensure appellant has the 

opportunity to fully examine the appellate record.

The trial court shall cause its finding and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of 

proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's 

record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty 

days from the date of this order.

 PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

9th day of September, 2021.