alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-382-JD

Concertra Integrated

Services, Inc.

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-383-SM

Nsight Technologies, LLC

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-384-JD

B&H Foto & Electronics,

Corp., et al.

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-385-PB

Physicians Specialty Hospital

of El Paso East, L.P.

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-386-SM

Christus Health Corp.

O R D E R

On October 24, 2006, the court issued an order in which it

proposed consolidating four other related cases into Civil No.

06-cv-384-JD: Bogdanov v. Concentra Integrated Services, Inc.,

Case 1:06-cv-00382-JD Document 5 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
2

06-cv-382-JD; Bogdanov v. Nsight Technologies, LLC, 06-cv-383-SM;

Bogdanov v. Physicians Specialty Hospital of El Paso East, L.P.,

06-cv-385-PB; and Bogdanov v. Christus Health Corporation, 06-cv386-SM. Olga L. Bogdanov, the Chapter 7 Trustee, filed a notice

in each case consenting to consolidation. None of the defendants

responded.

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the court’s order of

October 24, the four cases cited above are consolidated into

Bogdanov v. B&H Foto & Electronics, Corp., 06-cv-284-JD, solely

for the purpose of addressing the motions to withdraw the

reference from the bankruptcy court.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

November 14, 2006

cc: Geraldine L. Karonis, Esquire

Olga L. Bogdanov, pro se

Concentra Integrated Services, Inc.

Nsight Technologies, LLC

B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.

Physicians Specialty Hospital of El Paso East, L.P.

Christus Health Corp.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00382-JD Document 5 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for consistent treatment

of survivor benefits for public safety officers killed in the line of duty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for

consistent treatment of survivor benefits for public safety

officers killed in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Hero Survivor

5 Benefit Fairness Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF SURVIVOR BENEFITS

7 FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS KILLED IN

8 THE LINE OF DUTY.

9 Subsection (b) of section 1528 of the Taxpayer Relief

10 Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–34) is amended by striking
2

•HR 1727 IH

1 the period and inserting ‘‘, and to amounts received after

2 the date of the enactment of the Fallen Hero Survivor

3 Benefit Fairness Act of 2001 with respect to individuals

4 dying on or before December 31, 1996.’’.

Æ
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba

1991...... 100.0 4.3 7.6 32.2 39.2 13.3 2.5 .9 10.9 8.8 1.0 .7 

1992...... 100.0 2.0 5.3 25.3 41.1 19.6 5.1 1.6 12.5 11.3 1.2 1.0 

1993...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 27.8 40.4 18.4 4.6 1.3 12.3 12.3 1.2 1.1 

1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 

1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 

1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 

1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 

1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 

1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 

2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 

2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 

2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 

1998: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 9.1 1.0 .9 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 

1999: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 3.0 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 6.1 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.1 8.9 .9 .9 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 

2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.2 3.1 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.5 6.1 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 

2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 

2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6 

 Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.

27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Resource Management Company

v. Civil No. 06-cv-366-JD

Frank Gregory

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Resource Management Company’s Motion to Enjoin Defendant

from Making Objection to Immediate Payment to Plaintiff of Funds

Held by Non-Party Petroff & Associates has been referred to me

for ruling. 

 I recommend that the parties be ordered to provide Petroff a

directive and agreement to place the funds in escrow with the

Clerk of this Court to be paid out in accordance with the

judgment of this Court.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United

States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 14, 2007

cc: Benjamin C. Riggs, Jr., pro se

 Frank Gregory, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 62 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1583

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, as the ‘‘Lee H.

Hamilton Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 2001

Mr. HILL (for himself, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. PENCE, Mr. ROEMER, Mr.

SOUDER, Mr. BUYER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. KERNS, Mr.

HOSTETTLER, and Ms. CARSON of Indiana) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany,

Indiana, as the ‘‘Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany, Indi6 ana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lee H. Ham7 ilton Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 1583 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lee H.

6 Hamilton Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Æ
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being,
      Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Dated:
      October 20, 2006





/s/
              Bruce
              Korman
            
            
            /s/
              Edmund
              KingChief
              Executive Officer
            
            
            Chief
              Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
      or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to Cash Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Cash Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V.

Lena Bagaya

Case No. 05-cr-49-01-SM

ORDE R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no . 13) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2006 trial period . Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than December 23, 2005 . On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective .

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C. §

3161(h) (8) (B) (iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances .

Case 1:05-cr-00049-SM Document 14 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
Final Pretrial Conference : April 19, 2006 at 2:30 PM

Jury Selection: May 2, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

December 13, 200 5

cc: Albert Rubega, Esq.

Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

U. S . Probation

U. S . Marshal

Steven J.,McAu

2

Case 1:05-cr-00049-SM Document 14 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-92-PB

Fnu Lnu

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

September 5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to prepare a defense. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from September 5, 1007 to November 6, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00092-PB Document 15 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 27, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to October 24, 2007 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 23, 2007

cc: Richard Monteith, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00092-PB Document 15 Filed 08/24/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-64-PB

Jason Thomas

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

January 8, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize a plea agreement or otherwise prepare

for trial. The government does not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 8, 2008 to April 1, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00064-PB Document 33 Filed 12/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The December 20, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to March 27, 2008 at 3:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 20, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00064-PB Document 33 Filed 12/20/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KEVIN JEROME MOORE,

Defendant.

8:23MJ315

ORDER

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska.

IT IS ORDERED:

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the Federal 

Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith 

file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public Defender should 

decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of the Criminal Justice Act 

Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a draft 

appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other identifying information of 

the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for 

this district.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska.

DATED this 25th day of May, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-mj-00315-MDN Doc # 7 Filed: 05/25/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rex Fornaro

v. Case No. 06-cv-468-PB

Daniel Neelon, et al.

O R D E R

The clerk shall set a hearing on document no. 103. Three

days prior to the hearing, the defendant shall file as a chart

identifying each document request or interrogatory at issue, the

order or orders directing the plaintiff to respond, and a summary

of the plaintiff’s response. The chart shall be supported by

excerpted copies of requests, orders, and responses that are

indexed to the chart. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 12, 2008

cc: Gordon R. Blakeney, Jr., Esq.

Ralph Suozzo, Esq. 

Robert J. Consavich, Esq.

Christopher P. Flanagan, Esq.

Michele Carlucci, Esq.

William T. Bogaert, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00468-PB Document 130 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Everlast Roofing, Inc.

v. Civil No. 07-cv-020-JD

Guy Fauteux d/b/a

Everlast Metal Roofs

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

A hearing on damages was held on May 29, 2007. Upon motion

granted plaintiff proceeded on proffer. Defendant defaulted on a

complaint that he violated the trademarks “Everlast”, “Everlast

II”, and “Everlast Roofing, Inc.” Plaintiff cannot quantify

damages because it has not been able to get discovery. However,

the default under N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 358-A does provide a

monetary remedy, “actual damages or $1,000 . . . .” 

Here, shortly after first knowledge of the violation in

2005, defendant was sent, and receipted for, a “cease and desist”

demand. Counsel’s follow-up call to defendant resulted in his

wife acknowledging receipt of the demand and her assurance that

defendant would change the name of his business. In the fall of

2006, however, one of defendant’s unhappy customers called

plaintiff to complain of “Everlast’s” bad job. It became clear

that defendant had again used the name and caused confusion. I

Case 1:07-cv-00020-JD Document 12 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 3
2

find the defendant’s violation of N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 358-A

willful. I triple the $1,000.00. I also award legal fees and

expenses as set forth and detailed in Exhibit 1, a total of

$9,795.46. 

In addition, I recommend an injunction as requested. 

In summary, I recommend judgment as follows: 

1. Liquidated damages tripled - $ 3,000.00

2. Legal

Fees $9,287.98

Expenses 507.48

 9,795.46

$12,795.46

together with interest from

the judgment. 

3. Injunction: Defendant is permanently enjoined,

pursuant to N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 358-A from using the

trade name and trademarks “Everlast”, “Everlast II”,

and/or “Everlast Roofing, Inc.” and any other name that

would cause confusion as to his affiliation with

plaintiff. 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

Case 1:07-cv-00020-JD Document 12 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 3
3

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 30, 2007

cc: Dawnangela A. Minton, Esq.

 John G. Osborn, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00020-JD Document 12 Filed 05/30/07 Page 3 of 3
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2016


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: September 30, 2016
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen MCALLISTER, in her official capacity as Deputy Regtional Forester for region One of the Forest Service; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-35789.

D.C. No. CV-02-00106-DWM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 21, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

This preliminary injunction appeal comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We subject a district court’s order regarding preliminary injunctive relief only to limited review. *Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.,*198 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Cir.1999). Our review of an order regarding a preliminary injunction “is much more limited than review of an order involving a permanent injunction, where all conclusions of law are freely reviewable.” *Id.*A decision regarding a preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, which occurs only if the district court based its decision on either an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings. *Id.*

We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion here. We therefore affirm the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part the preliminary injunction. Our disposition will affect the rights of the parties only until the district court renders final judgment. *Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press International,*686 F.2d 750, 752 (9th Cir.1982).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 12, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 12, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Isaac Kier, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of MPLC,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Isaac Kier
----------------------
Isaac Kier
President, Secretary
Treasurer and Director


                                       16