alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF also have been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1996 1997 1998

1999 2000

Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar.p

1 Deposits .............................. 167 457 167 166 243 189 501 71 82 87 125

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 638,049 620,885 607,574 626,669 634,086 621,351 629,430 632,482 627,326 631,421 641,830

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 11,197 10,763 10,343 10,271 10,155 10,114 10,015 9,933 9,866 9,771 9,711

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 
  





 
 August 26, 2019 
 Sanjay
Dhawan 
 Dear Sanjay, 
 This is to confirm that the Offer
Letter to you from Nuance Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) dated as of February 14, 2019 (the “Offer Letter”) is amended to change your start date to today, August 26, 2019. 

Sincerely, 
 /s/ Mark Benjamin 

Mark Benjamin 
 Chief Executive Officer 

I ACCEPT THE AMENDED OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT AS STATED ABOVE 

	
	
	/s/ Sanjay Dhawan
	NAME – Sanjay Dhawan
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 1999


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/19/2015 9:10:42 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Vaillancourt

a/k/a Bryan Bernard

v. Civil No. 06-cv-438-JD

Bernie Campbell, et al

O R D E R

The Court hereby vacates the endorsed order of May 3, 2007, denying document no. 98,

Motion for Default.

SO ORDERED.

May 4, 2007 /s/James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Joseph Vaillancourt, pro se

Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00438-JD Document 163 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3567WM

_____________ Henry L. Ivy, Jr., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: August 7, 1997

Filed: August 18, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Henry L. Ivy, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Ivy 's motion to vacate and co rrect his sentence, brought under former Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35( a). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude th e district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. We thus af firm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Mrs. Adele Hebert CHAUVIN v. J. G. DUPLANTIS.

No. 1485.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 29, 1935.

Harris Gagne, of Houma, for appellant.

Ellender & Ellender, of Houma, for ap-pellee.

LE BLANC, Judge.

For the reasons contained in the opinion this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Mrs. Vanolia Hebert Domangue et al. v. J. G. Duplantis, and Mrs. Adele Hebert Chauvin v. J. G. Duplantis (La. App.) 162 So. 596.

It is ordered that the judgment appealed from in this case be, and the same is hereby, affirmed at the costs of the appellant.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens Holding Co. for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert J. DiNicola, as ChiefExecutive Officer of Linens Holding Co., and Francis M. Rowan, as ChiefFinancial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of his knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Linens HoldingCo.

 
| /s/ Robert J. DiNicola |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
| **Name:**              | Robert J. DiNicola        |
| **Title:**             | Chairman and Chief        |
|                   | Executive Officer         |
| **Date:**              | August 14, 2007           |
| ** **             |                      |
| ** **             |                      |
| /s/ Francis M.  Rowan  |                      |
| **Name:**              | Francis M. Rowan          |
| **Title:**             | Senior Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer   |
| **Date:**              | August 14, 2007           |
|                        |                           |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

*Notice of Cancellation:*                     This notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 15, 2008, Volume 73, Number 159, page 47952. The meeting previously scheduled to convene on September 16, 2008 has been cancelled.                 

*For Further Information Contact:*                     Ms. Monica L. Swann, Management and Program Analyst, Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, M/S K50, Atlanta, GA 30341; telephone (770) 488-5278, fax (770) 488-5767; E-mail                     *mswann@cdc.gov.*

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and                           ( print page 53026)                        Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Dated: September 8, 2008. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Director, Management Analysis and Service Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E8-21280 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-5008

_____________________________

JOHN FRANK SABOR III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

March 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; John Frank Sabor 

III, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6962** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
BARBARA M. BUSH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Benson Everett Legg , District Judge. ( 8:06

- cr - 00202

- BEL

- 1 )

Submitted : November 29, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Barba ra M
. Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Barbara M. Bush appeals following th e dismissal of an indictment charging her with two counts of threatening a federal judge, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876(c) (2006). “[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, a defendant has no standing to appeal the dismissal of an indictment.” United Stat es v.
Moller

- Butcher , 732 F.2d 189, 190 (1st Cir. 1983); see also
United States v. Lanham , 631 F.2d 356 (4th Cir. 1980). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Bush’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
#### Patricio B. BAUTISTA, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-7095.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 1, 2003.

Before RADER, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

RADER, Circuit Judge.

On April 30, 2003, this court directed Patricio B. Bautista to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. No response has been received.

Judgment was entered by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on September 3, 2002. Any appeal of that judgment was due within 60 days, or by November 4, 2002. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1). Bautista’s appeal was filed on March 6, 2003. Because that notice was untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. *See Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v.*
      *846
      *United States,*716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir.1983).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### STATE ex rel. VOGEL v. CHAPMAN, Superintendent of State Prison Farm.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

Sept. 11, 1936.

Van C. Swearingen and I. J. A. Renno, both of Miami, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Bonnie Vogel, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

On July 20, 1936, she filed in this court a motion praying an order of this court directing the “Warden of the State Penitentiary at Raiford, Florida” to deliver her, the said Bonnie Vogel, to the sheriff of Dade county, Fla., to be held in custody of the sheriff during the pen-dence of a writ of error, or until released as provided by law.

We denied that petition without prejudice to the plaintiff in error to apply to the circuit court for a proper order.

It appears from the petition for habeas corpus now before us that it is the contention of the petitioner that she should be discharged from custody upon the theory that there is not now pending against her any charge of a violation of the laws of the state of Florida.

The opinion and judgment of this court filed on the 27th day of May, 1936 (Vogel v. State, 168 So. 539), did not determine that there was no valid charge of violating the criminal statutes of Florida pending against the petitioner. Nor was it held that the charge presented by the information before us was insufficient. The judgment was reversed because of the infirmity of the verdict, and upon such reversal-the charge embraced in the information stood against the petitioner in the .criminal court of record of Dade county, Fla., subject to disposition by new trial, or otherwise, as may be determined according to law.

It therefore follows that petition for habeas corpus is denied without prejudice for the petitioner to apply to the circuit court of Dade county for an order for her transfer from the State Prison Farm at Raiford, Fla., and custody of L. F. Chapman, the superintendent thereof, to the custody of the sheriff of Dade county, Fla.

So ordered.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Leaping Group Co., Ltd.
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tao Jiang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: October 31, 2019
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Tao Jiang                 
|                       |  | Name: Tao Jiang               
|                       |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Zachary Clay Norwood , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00169

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 354th District Court of
Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 33663CR ). Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and
Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

van Cleef

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case

. We further order that the appell ee, t he State of Texas

, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 12 , 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
()
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IMPLICIT, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

SANDVINE CORPORATION,

Defendant

______________________ 

2020-1976, 2020-2045

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:18-cv-00053-JRG, Chief 

Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JASON LEE ROMRELL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, 

Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ROBERT SHAFFER; J.

DEREK MCCORQUINDALE, Reston, VA. 

 ERIC ALLAN BURESH, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, 

argued for defendant-cross-appellant. 

Case: 20-1976 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 05/06/2022
 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and PROST,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

May 6, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1976 Document: 61 Page: 2 Filed: 05/06/2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-171-PB

Lucien Arsenault

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the November 7, 2006

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete discovery and prepare a defense. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from November 7, 2006 to January 9, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00171-PB Document 9 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 30, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued 

until December 18, 2006 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 25, 2006

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00171-PB Document 9 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8717-1]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a meeting to discuss the NPDES Program Management Information Rule. This meeting will be a session at which EPA will present possible options for the proposed rule. The purpose of this meeting is to give interested parties an opportunity to discuss the proposed rule options and to provide EPA comments on the presented options.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is EPA East Room 1153, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Participants may call into the meeting at 1-866-212-1875, access code: 835325#.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lauren Spath at 202-565-0016 or                         *spath.lauren@epa.gov.*                         Please reply by September 30, 2008 if you plan on calling in or attending this meeting.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting will be open to all stakeholders interested in the rule EPA is developing to gather NPDES program management information. After considerable dialogue with NPDES authorized states, the Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution Control Administrators, and the Environmental Council of States, EPA decided to develop a proposed rulemaking in order to ensure that the site specific information essential to manage the national NPDES program, thereby ensuring protection of public health and the environment, is available on a nationally consistent, timely, accurate, and complete basis.

      ( print page 53866)    
Dated: September 10, 2008.

Lisa Lund,

Director, Office of Compliance.

[FR Doc. E8-21725 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P