alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amend. to the BlackRock, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Retention and Incentive Plan


 Exhibit 10.29 
  
 First Amendment to the 
  
 BlackRock, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Retention and Incentive Plan 
  

1. Section 1(n) of the BlackRock, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Retention and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of the date
hereof, to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “Company
Peer Group” means those companies reported in the Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated Asset Manager Valuation Report (Alliance Capital Management Holding L.P.; Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; AMVESCAP PLC; Franklin
Resources, Inc.; BlackRock, Inc.; Eaton Vance Corp.; Federated Investors, Inc.; Gabelli Asset Management Inc.; Janus Capital Group; John Nuveen Co.; Legg Mason, Inc.; Neuberger Berman Inc.; T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Waddell & Reed Financial,
Inc.; and W.P. Stewart & Co. Ltd. as of November 12, 2003), taking into account any addition or removal of companies as shall be made by Merrill Lynch (or such entity, that shall not be affiliated with the Company, that publishes a report on
such universe if Merrill Lynch ceases to publish the report), provided that the performance of such added or removed companies shall be pro-rated through, or commencing on, respectively, the date that any such companies are removed or added.
In the event that the Merrill Lynch Asset Manager Valuation Report loses three or more members after the Effective Date, then the Committee shall hire a nationally recognized independent compensation consultant to determine an equitable adjustment
to the Company Peer Group, if any. 
  
 2. Section 1(bb)(i) of the
Plan is hereby amended in its entirety, effective as of the date BlackRock, Inc. obtains stockholder approval and any other required approvals for this amendment, to read as follows: 
  
 (i) 100%, if the average closing price of Common Stock is equal to or in excess of $62 per share for (A) any period of one
calendar quarter during the period commencing January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2006, or (B) any period of three months commencing prior to and including December 31, 2006, whichever is earlier; or 
  
 3. In all other respects the Plan is hereby confirmed. 
  
 Dated this 12th day of November, 2003.
#### Binna Han et al., Appellants, v Chungwon Bark, Respondent.

[806 NYS2d 878]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated January 14, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a prior order of the same court (Golar, J.) dated August 27, 2004, granting their motion for leave to enter judgment upon the defendant’s default in appearing or answering the complaint, and to compel them to accept the defendant’s answer.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion is denied, and the order dated August 27, 2004, is reinstated.

To vacate his default in appearing or answering the complaint, the defendant was required to present a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Cohen v Houseconnect Realty Corp.,*16 AD3d 539 [2005]; *Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*10 AD3d 393 [2004]). The defendant failed to make that showing. The speculative and unsubstantiated claims of the defense counsel and the claims adjuster as to whether the defendant received service of process did not amount to a reasonable excuse for the default, given the affidavit of service indicating proper service under CPLR 308 (4) *(see Sardar v Birra,*287 AD2d 446, 447 [2001]; *see generally Platonov v Sciabarra,*305 AD2d 651 [2003]; *Truscello v Olympia Constr.,*294 AD2d 350, 351 [2002]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1,2019 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2019-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2024.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c) (4) and 552b(c) (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate requests 
for preclinical development resources for potential new therapeutics 
for the treatment of cancer. The outcome of the evaluation will be a 
decision whether NCI should support request(s) and make available 
contract resources for development of the potential therapeutic to 
improve the treatment of various forms of cancer. The research 
proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets 
or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposed 
research projects, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Rapid Access to Intervention Development.
    Date: November 5-6, 2008.
    Time: 1 p.m.-5 p.m.
    Agenda: To evaluate the Rapid Access to Intervention Development 
Portfolio.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Executive Plaza North, 
Conference Room H, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Phyllis G. Bryant, Executive Secretary, Program 
Analyst, Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer 
Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 8022, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-8720, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcacbee8e9ad9cb2b5b4f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86f6e4b2b3f7c6e8efeea8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-22316 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit corporation; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant-Appellee, High Desert Multiple-Use Coalition; et al., Defendant-Intervenors, and Robert Arnold; Dave Fisher, Appellants.

Nos. 00-16869, 00-17032.

D.C. No. CV-00-00927-WHA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

In these related appeals, Robert Arnold and Dave Fisher appeal pro se the district court’s orders denying their motions to intervene as of right. Appellants sought to intervene as defendants in an action brought by environmental advocacy groups alleging that the federal Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) failed to comply with the Endangered Species Act, 16 U. S.C. § 1536(a)(2) & (d), in its management of the California Desert Conservation Area (“CDCA”). Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief requiring BLM to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and to deny various uses in the CDCA until such consultation is complete. We dismiss appeal No. 00-16869 and affirm appeal No. 00-17032.

*725In appeal No. 00-16869, Arnold has moved to voluntarily dismiss. We grant the motion and dismiss appeal No. GO-16869.

Fisher did not move to intervene until after the parties had settled the liability phase. The district court properly determined that Fisher’s interests were adequately represented by parties who had timely moved to intervene. *See McDonald v. Means,*300 F.3d 1037, 1044 (9th Cir. 2002) (stating that party seeking to intervene as of right must make a timely motion and show that his interests are inadequately represented by existing parties) (citation omitted).

Appeal No. 00-16869 DISMISSED.

Appeal No. 00-17032 AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Harvey Pratt

v. 06-cv-291-PB

State of New Hampshire

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated September 18, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

October 10, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Harvey Pratt, Pro Se

Case 1:06-cv-00291-PB Document 8 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 157

To provide that December 7 each year shall be treated for all purposes 
    related to Federal employment in the same manner as November 11.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Quinn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that December 7 each year shall be treated for all purposes 
    related to Federal employment in the same manner as November 11.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That December 7 each year shall be treated for all purposes related to 
Federal employment in the same manner as November 11.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Quality Resorts of America, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 1997. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Quentra Networks, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2000. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Quokka Sports, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2000. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 19, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 2, 2008. 

By the Commission. 

J. Lynn Taylor, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22373 Filed 9-19-08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

ELECTRONIC SOUND, INC., a Nebraska 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire 

Insurance Company; and ZATA ELECTRIC, 

LLC, 

Defendants.

8:23CV199

ORDER ON VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

OF DEFENDANT NORTH AMERICAN 

SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff Electronic Sound, Inc., filed a Complaint alleging a claim under the Miller Act, 

40 U.S.C. § 3133 et seq. against defendant North American Specialty Insurance Company and two 

breach of contract claims against defendant Zata Electric, LLC. Filing 1 at 3–5. The record shows 

that both defendants have been served with the summons in this case, see Filing 13; Filing 16, but 

neither defendant has appeared, answered, or otherwise responded to the Complaint in this matter. 

The record also shows that Electronic Sound obtained the Clerk’s Entry of Default of defendant 

Zata Electric, LLC, upon the record. Filing 15. 

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant North American 

Specialty Insurance Company. Filing 17. Specifically, Electronic Sound moves to dismiss its first 

cause of action in the Complaint with prejudice and moves to dismiss defendant North American 

Specialty Insurance Company only as a party because a settlement has been entered regarding that

Defendant. Filing 17 at 1. Thus, it appears that Electronic Sound will pursue a default judgment 

against Zata Electric. Under the circumstances, the Court finds that dismissal of the first cause of 

8:23-cv-00199-BCB-CRZ Doc # 18 Filed: 08/08/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 35
2

action in its Complaint and the dismissal of defendant North American Specialty Insurance 

Company is appropriate. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant North American Specialty Insurance 

Company, Filing 17, is granted; 

2. Plaintiff’s first cause of action in its Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, with 

no award of costs or attorney’s fees to either party to that cause of action; and 

3. Defendant North American Specialty Insurance Company only is dismissed as a 

party to this lawsuit.

This case shall proceed on the second and third causes of action in Plaintiff’s Complaint 

against defendant Zata Electric, LLC.

Dated this 8th day of August, 2023.

BY THE COURT:  

_________________________

Brian C. Buescher 

United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00199-BCB-CRZ Doc # 18 Filed: 08/08/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 36
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1992...... 100.0 2.0 5.3 25.3 41.1 19.6 5.1 1.6 12.5 11.3 1.2 1.0 1993...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 27.8 40.4 18.4 4.6 1.3 12.3 12.3 1.2 1.1 1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 1999: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.1 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.2 3.1 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.5 6.1 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
**Exhibit        32(b)**

**TXU        CORP.**

**Certificate        Pursuant to Section 906**

**of        Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002**

**CERTIFICATION        OF CFO**

| 1.   | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006                (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                                     |
|    |                                                                                                                |                                                                                                           |
|         |                                                                                                                |                              /s/ David A. Campbell |
|         | Name:   David                A. Campbell                                                                       |
|         | Title:                    Executive Vice President and                Acting Chief Financial Officer |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Deborah C. Aumand

 v. Case No. Civil No. 06-cv-434-JL

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

O R D E R

One of the parties has requested the transcription of the jury selection and trial in the

above-captioned case. The jury selection transcript contains both juror names and side bar

conferences with counsel regarding individual jurors selected for potential impanelment in the

case. Having reviewed the transcripts, and consistent with the Judicial Conference Guidance

approved in March 2009, the court finds that in balancing the right to public access with the

jurors’ right to privacy, the transcript will not be sealed. Jurors names, however, shall be

redacted.

SO ORDERED.

Date: May 19, 2010 ______________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00434-JL Document 127 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 1