alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, R. Scot Sellers, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (the“registrant”).2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles.  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalentfunction); a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       BY: /s/ R. SCOT SELLERS               R. Scot Sellers          *Chairman and*
J. 

good cause and actual prejudice. See MRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). 

Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was 

required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. MRS 

34.800(2). 

Relying in part on Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 

1309 (2012), appellant argued that he had good cause because he was not 

appointed counsel in the first post-conviction proceedings. We conclude 

that this argument lacked merit. The appointment of counsel was 

discretionary in the first post-conviction proceedings, see NRS 34.750(1), 

and appellant failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion or provide an 

explanation for why he could not raise this claim earlier. Further, this 

court has recently held that Martinez does not apply to Nevada's statutory 

post-conviction procedures. See Brown v. McDaniel, Nev. , P.3d 

(Adv. Op. No. 60, August 7, 2014). Thus, the failure to appoint postconviction counsel and the decision in Martinez would not provide good 

cause for this late and successive petition. Therefore, the district court did 

not err in denying this petition as procedurally barred, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

/ 1..toewte, J. 

Hardesty 

J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge 

Joe Piceno 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A e
Case 1:06-cv-00442-JD   Document 14   Filed 12/29/06   Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1161 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1161

To authorize the American Friends of the Czech Republic to establish a 
    memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2001

  Mr. Gilman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the American Friends of the Czech Republic to establish a 
    memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The American Friends of the Czech Republic is 
authorized to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk on the 
Federal land in the District of Columbia described in subsection (b).
    (b) Location of Memorial.--The Federal land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the triangle of land in the District of Columbia that 
is bordered by 19th Street, NW., H Street, NW., and Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., and designated as plot number 30 in area II on the map 
numbered 869/86501 and dated May 1, 1986, and which is located across H 
Street, NW., from the International Bank for Reconstruction and 
Development.
    (c) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with the 
Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
    (d) Limitation on Payment of Expenses.--The United States 
Government shall not pay any expense for the establishment of the 
memorial.
                                 <all>
```
Accountants' Acknowledgement

Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

     Re:  Registration Statement Numbers 333-26819 and 333-26827 on Form S-8

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness  of the use therein of our report  dated April 15, 1997 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                             /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New York, New York
May 8, 1997
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1447

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to clarify the right

of nationals of the United States to make contributions in connection

with an election to political office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

clarify the right of nationals of the United States to

make contributions in connection with an election to

political office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF RIGHT OF NATIONALS OF

4 THE UNITED STATES TO MAKE POLITICAL

5 CONTRIBUTIONS.

6 Section 319(b)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign

7 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b)(2)) is amended by inserting

8 after ‘‘United States’’ the following: ‘‘or a national of the
2

•HR 1447 IH

1 United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Im2 migration and Nationality Act)’’.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CEDRIC GIPSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1123

[January 26, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 from the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 17009361CF10A.

Cedric Gipson, South Bay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven A. Swan

v. Case No. 06-cv-088-SM

Thomas P. Colantuono,

William E. Morse,

James W. Chapman, Jr.,

Roberta Keenan,

Donald Feith,

Paul J. Barbadoro,

and Unspecified Defendants

RECUSAL ORDER

I hereby recuse myself from this case.

SO ORDERED.

March 10, 2006 ______________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

March 13, 2006

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

March 10, 2006 /s/Paul Barbadoro _______

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 10, 2006 ______________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

Clerk, USDC, Rhode Island

Case 1:06-cv-00088-ECT Document 5 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 1 of 1

Swan v. Colantuono et al Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROBERT JOHNSON,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 8:23CR108

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [45]. 

For the reasons set forth in the motion, and for good cause shown, the continuance is 

granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [45] is granted, as 

follows:

1. The jury trial now set for September 26, 2023, is continued to November 28, 

2023.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as 

a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date 

and November 28, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation 

of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a 

continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective 

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

DATED: September 12, 2023

 BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Hansen

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00108-BCB-MDN Doc # 46 Filed: 09/12/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 93
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-55-01-SM

Richard Ouellette

O R D E R

Defendant Ouellette’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 25). Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008

trial period. Defendant Ouellette shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than March 6, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 20, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00055-SM Document 26 Filed 02/22/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 22, 2008

cc: Jaye Rancourt, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00055-SM Document 26 Filed 02/22/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.01


CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial
officer of AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund
IV LP (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the
Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.




Date:
August 14, 2008




By:  /s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President
(principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS
Futures Management LLC


General
Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
|  | 1.  | to      the best of our knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.  | to      the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of Registrant. |
|--|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 12, 2009 | /s/ Burton Katz              |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|
|                    | Burton      Katz             |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                    |                         |
| Date:      May 12, 2009 | /s/ Andrew Zaref             |
|                    | Andrew      Zaref            |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 35.12  LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of October 1, 2018 by and among Deutsche
Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services, LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, DBGS 2018-C1 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C1 (DBGS 2018-C1) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the
following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of October 30,
2018 to December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:

/s/    Adam
Singer



Date: March 1 , 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-201-01-PB

Jesus Diaz-Luna

aka Jose Gonzalez-Luna

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the December 6, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

finalize plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to finalize a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from December 6, 2005 to February

7, 2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00201-PB Document 11 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The November 22, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until January 30, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 21, 2005

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00201-PB Document 11 Filed 11/21/05 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1507

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify certain franchise

operation property as 15-year depreciable property.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify

certain franchise operation property as 15-year depreciable property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Fran5 chise Property Recovery Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. CLASS LIFE FOR FRANCHISE OPERATIONS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(e)(3)(E) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1996 (classifying certain property as

9 15-year property) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end

10 of the clause (ii), by striking the period at the end of
2

•HR 1507 IH

1 clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the

2 end the following new clause:

3 ‘‘(iv) any section 1250 property which

4 is a franchise operation subject to section

5 1253.’’.

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (B)

7 of section 168(g)(3) of such Code is amended by inserting

8 after the item relating to subparagraph (E)(iii) in the

9 table contained therein the following new item:

‘‘(E)(iv) .............................................................................................. 15’’.

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to—

12 (1) property placed in service on or after the

13 date of the enactment of this Act, and

14 (2) property placed in service before such date

15 if the taxpayer elects (in such form and manner as

16 the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe) to

17 have such amendments apply to such property.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      186,012
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          46,817
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        12,262
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,091
<COMMON>                                         1,244
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       37,495
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             50,915
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  89,654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            70,276
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              15,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  61,111
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  245,091
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      132,886
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,194
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      30,430
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      45,624
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         17,778
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 304
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  18,082
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,811
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,271
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        278
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   13,993
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,388
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,972
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          21,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.25
        

</TABLE>