alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1600 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1600

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
   the use of foreign tax credits under the alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

 Mr. Houghton (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
  Crane, Mr. Armey, Ms. Dunn, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Lewis of 
   Georgia, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Foley, Mr. 
Ramstad, Mr. Herger, Ms. Hart, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Hayworth, 
Mr. Pomeroy, and Mr. English) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
   the use of foreign tax credits under the alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON FOREIGN TAX CREDIT UNDER ALTERNATIVE 
              MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 59(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to alternative minimum tax foreign tax credit) is amended by 
striking paragraph (2) and by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 
paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 53(d)(1)(B)(i)(II) of such Code 
is amended by striking ``and if section 59(a)(2) did not apply''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 3 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 4 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 5 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 6 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 7 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 8 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 9 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 10 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 11 of 12Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 8 Filed 06/24/05 Page 12 of 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-134-02-SM

Raymond Jackson

O R D E R

Defendant Jackson’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 40). Trial has been rescheduled for the September 

2007 trial period. Defendant Jackson shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than May 21, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. No further continuances absent extraordinaray circumstances. The

parties shall be prepared to go forward as scheduled.

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00134-SM Document 41 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 11, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00134-SM Document 41 Filed 05/11/07 Page 2 of 2
y , , y

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.
#### Bob B. MIDYETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. A. SCAIFE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 5738.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 28, 1939.

Craig, Bolin, Magee & Baucum, of Mansfield, fov appellant.

J. S. Pickett, of Many, for appellees.

HAMITER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in this court, styled Jules Middleton et al. v. E. A. Scaife et al., 190 So. 829, this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.
5 Foreign currencies..................... 30,809 36,001 32,182 30,941 30,406 31,535 30,014 30,429 31,037 30,130 30,118

1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF also have been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1997 1998 1999

2000

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug.p

1 Deposits .............................. 457 167 71 82 87 125 142 110 104 76 78

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 620,885 607,574 632,482 627,326 631,421 641,830 632,216 623,553 627,081 624,177 628,001

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 10,763 10,343 9,933 9,866 9,771 9,711 9,711 9,711 9,688 9,688 9,674

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 13, 2013

d1112

Order 

Clerk

November 13, 2013

147804(19)(20)

MICHIGAN FINANCE AUTHORITY,

Plaintiff/

Counter-Defendant-Appellant,

v SC: 147804

COA: 318451 

Ingham CC: 13-000528-CZ

HANS KIEBLER and DONOVAN VISSER,

Defendants/

Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 16, 2013 order is considered, and 

it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1432 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1432

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ``Major Lyn 
                    McIntosh Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3698 
Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major Lyn McIntosh Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ABDUL RAZAK ALI, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

BARACK H. OBAMA,i et af., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 10-1020 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

h.... 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

(March~, 2011) 

For the reasons set forth in this Court's public Memorandum Order of January 11, 

2011 and for the reasons set forth in this Court's Classified Memorandum Opinion of 

February 28, 2011, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Petitioner Ali's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED. 

1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25( d), if a public officer named 

as a party to an action in his official capacity ceases to hold office, the court will 

automatically substitute that officer's successor. Accordingly, the Court substitutes 

Barack H. Obama for George W. Bush.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6865

ROBERT DEAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANTHONY MALLOREY; HUSSEN OZINAL, Doctor;

SANDRA EARLY, Medical Staff of Staunton

Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-492-R)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Dean, Appellant Pro Se. Colin James Steuart Thomas, III,

TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dean

v. Mallorey, No. CA-95-492-R (W.D. Va. May 10, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1487 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1487

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 
minimum tax treatment of incentive stock options, thereby changing the 
  taxable event from the exercise of the stock option to the sale of 
                                 stock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

   Ms. Lofgren (for herself, Mrs. Tauscher, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Farr of 
  California, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Matsui, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. 
Honda, Ms. Harman, Mr. Baird, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Sherman, and Mr. Moran of 
  Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 
minimum tax treatment of incentive stock options, thereby changing the 
  taxable event from the exercise of the stock option to the sale of 
                                 stock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX TREATMENT OF INCENTIVE 
              STOCK OPTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 56 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to adjustments applicable to 
individuals) is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to incentive stock options exercised in 2000 or 
thereafter regardless of when such options were granted.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-50-PB

Gene Stram

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to engage in plea negotiations or prepare for

trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to August 21, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00050-PB Document 11 Filed 05/23/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 24, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

July 23, 2007 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 23, 2007

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00050-PB Document 11 Filed 05/23/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report), we, Richard A. Post, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD A. POST                              
|Richard A. Post Chief Executive Officer May 31, 2005



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL SCHMIDT                                                            
|Michael Schmidt Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) May 31, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM EAGLE WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       1,886,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,501,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,094,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,549,712
<PP&E>                                         909,855
<DEPRECIATION>                               (158,144)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,370,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          560,051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,605
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,370,946
<SALES>                                      1,063,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,158,307
<CGS>                                          420,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               556,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,257)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                175,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (79,442)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .008
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cv-354-PB

General Electric Company

J U D G M E N T

In accordance with the following, judgment is hereby entered:

 Bench Ruling rendered on November 10, 2008 by Judge Paul Barbadoro finding that

GE did otherwise arrange for the disposal of the scrap Pyranol when it entered into its

relationship with Mr, Fletcher; the Stipulation and Order as to the Removal Action Costs

dated July 9, 2010, and the Order dated December 3, 2010 by Judge Paul Barbadoro granting

plaintiff’s cross motion to summary judgment.

By the Court,

/s/ James R. Starr

James R. Starr, Clerk

December 6, 2010

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00354-PB Document 161 Filed 12/06/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.01





RULE
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




I, John
Hummel, certify that:









1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AIS Futures Fund IV
L.P.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.









Date:
May 15, 2008




By:  /s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President
(principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS
Futures Management LLC


General
Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1366

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 11, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Government Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1366 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HECTOR G. GODINEZ POST

2 OFFICE BUILDING.

3 The United States Post Office building located at

4 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California,

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

6 Post Office Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

10 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

12 Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kurt Carpentino

V .

NH State Prison Warden

Civil No. 05-cv-36-JD

ORDE R

On February 17, 2005, the Court granted plaintiff's Motion to Stay this case . One of the

conditions of the stay was that the plaintiff was to "contact this Court every 90 days, beginning from

the date of entry of this order, and inform the court of the status and pendency of his state court

proceedings . . . "

Subsequently, Mr. Carpentino filed a status report on May 17, 2005, August 15, 2005 and

another on November 10, 2005. Since November, however, Mr. Carpentino has not notified the

court of any status.

It is herewith ordered that Mr. Carpentino file a status report on or before Wednesday, May

10, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

April 24, 2006 /s/ James R. Muirhead

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Kurt Carpentino, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00036-JD Document 8 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 1