alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fergust C. LEDET et al. v. LOUISIANA HIGHWAY COMMISSION.

No. 2296.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 19, 1941.

Arthur B. Hammond and Tom M. Hayes, Jr., both of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Ellis, Ellis & Barranger, of Covington, Talley & Talley, of Bogalusa, and Pugh, Lanier & Pugh, of Thibodaux, for appel-lees.

DORE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Charles M. Warnick and others v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 4 So.2d 607, this day handed down, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023298
<NAME> AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         316,565
<SECURITIES>                                    61,530
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,092,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,605,505
<PP&E>                                          76,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,750,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,582,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,088
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,126,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,750,204
<SALES>                                        376,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               376,405
<CGS>                                          121,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,097,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (15,003)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (769,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,717)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (772,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (772,558)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1515 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1515

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment for 
    foreign tax credit limitation purposes of certain transfers of 
                          intangible property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

   Mr. Shaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment for 
    foreign tax credit limitation purposes of certain transfers of 
                          intangible property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF 
              INTANGIBLE PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C) of section 367(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new sentence: ``For purposes of applying the foreign tax 
credit limitation categories of section 904(d), any such amount shall 
be treated in the same manner as if such amount were a royalty.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts treated as received pursuant to section 367(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on or after August 5, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 1748

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 805 Glen

Burnie Road in Richmond, Virginia, as the ‘‘Tom Bliley Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

805 Glen Burnie Road in Richmond, Virginia, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Tom Bliley Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tom Bliley

Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 132

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Goro Hokama

Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii,

as the ‘‘Goro Hokama Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GORO HOKAMA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

5 Postal Service located at 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai

6 City, Hawaii, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Goro

7 Hokama Post Office Building’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
2

•HR 132 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Goro Hokama Post

3 Office Building.

Æ
Case 1:06-cv-00323-SM   Document 11   Filed 11/28/06   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         7,494
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,494
<PP&E>                                         386,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          576,583
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,238,223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,420,642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   394,165
<SALES>                                        410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               410
<CGS>                                          10,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (127,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (127,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (127,592)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be postmarked on or before October 14, 2008. Address written 
comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 2104, U.S. Department 
of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in 
Room 2104.
Docket Number: 08-047. Applicant: Stanford University, Department of 
Structural Biology, D100 Fairchild Building, 299 Campus Drive West, 
Stanford, CA 94305-5126. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai 
G2 F20 TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: 
The instrument is intended to be used to study purified proteins from 
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also known as baker's yeast, which are 
involved in transcription. Researchers plan to employ single particle 
analysis to study the protein complexes involved in transcription, the 
synthesis on RNA from a DNA template. Application accepted by 
Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection: August 25, 2008.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. E8-22107 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 07-cr-91-01-SM

Juan Evaristo Sanchez-Noboa,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Sanchez-Noboa’s motion to continue the trial and reschedule the

change of plea hearing is granted (document no. 30). Trial has been

rescheduled for the month of May 2008. Defendant Sanchez-Noboa shall file a

waiver of speedy trial rights not later than April 7, 2008. On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:07-cr-00091-SM Document 31 Filed 03/28/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference/Change of Plea Hearing is rescheduled for 

April 29, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. 

Jury selection will take place on May 6, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 28, 2008

cc: Mark Howard, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00091-SM Document 31 Filed 03/28/08 Page 2 of 2
#### Edward R. MAIER v. SWINEHART et al.

No. 8729.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 14, 1938.

L. M. Cahill and R. L. McNitt, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Hiram E. Casey and Stanley M. Arndt, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of appellees, and by direction of the court, it is ordfered that the appeal herein be dismissed for failure of appellant to file record and docket cause; that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly; and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1218, -1439 ULTIMAX CEMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, HASSAN KUNBARGI and KA GROUP,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim DefendantsAppellants, and HEARTLAND CEMENT SALES COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim DefendantAppellee, and RC CEMENT HOLDING COMPANY, SIGNAL MOUNTAIN CEMENT COMPANY, RIVER CEMENT COMPANY, HERCULES CEMENT COMPANY,

and RC CEMENT COMPANY,

Counterclaim Defendants,

v. CTS CEMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION (doing business as CTS Cement Manufacturing Company), EDWARD K. RICE, RAPID-SET PRODUCTS CO. (doing business as RSC, Inc.), CTS BULK TERMINALS CO., CHEM-COMP SYSTEMS, INC., JACK V. GOODMAN, PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., LAWRENCE B. COLLINS, BLUE DAISY CEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., KURT CAILLIER, A & A READY MIXED CONCRETE, INC., RYAN VANDERHOOK, SR., SHORT LOAD CONCRETE, INC., SIR-MIX CONCRETE PRODUCTS, WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES, INC., THE QUIKRETE COMPANIES, and GRUPO CEMENTOS DE CHIHUAHUA,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Cross Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 02-CV-578, Chief Judge Alicemarie Stotler.ON MOTION

Before MAYER Circuit Judge.
ORDER CTS Cement Manufacturing Corporation et al. move for judicial notice of a notice of allowance within the prosecution file history of U.S. Patent No. 6,406,534 and for judicial notice of a state court decision. The documents are attached to the motion for judicial notice. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT JUL 17 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date

cc: Saied Kashani, Esq. James W. Geriak, Esq. Michael Ross Annis, Esq. William J. Robinson, Esq.
s8 Jan Horbaly Clerk FILEP U.S. COUFtT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL

## 1 7 2009 JAN NORM'S CLERK

2008-1218, -1439 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-92-01/02-PB

Derrick Jennings and

Samuel Ogot

O R D E R

Defendant Derrick Jennings, through counsel, has moved to

continue the July 6, 2006 trial in the above case, citing the

need for additional time to complete discovery and prepare a

defense. The government and co-defendant do not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from July 6, 2006 to October 3, 2006. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00092-PB Document 17 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 27, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued 

until September 19, 2006 at 3:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 26, 2006

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00092-PB Document 17 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-171-PB

Lucien Arsenault

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

April 3, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to schedule a plea hearing on the negotiated plea

agreement. The government does not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 3, 2007 to May 1, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00171-PB Document 15 Filed 03/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The March 21, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

April 17, 2007 at 3:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 21, 2007

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Jennifer Cole Davis, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00171-PB Document 15 Filed 03/21/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-58-01-SM

Cornelius E. Owens

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 13) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the November 2005 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than September 30, 2005. On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00058-SM Document 14 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: October 21, 2005 at 4:15 PM

Jury Selection: November 1, 2005 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

September 22, 2005 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

 Scott P. Lopez, Esq. 

 Steven M. Gordon, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00058-SM Document 14 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-46-01-SM

Rayner Herrera

O R D E R

Defendant Herrera’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 18). Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2007

trial period. Defendant Herrera shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than January 24, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. No further continuances absent extraordinary circumstances.

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 24, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00046-SM Document 19 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

January 17 , 2007

cc: R. Brian Snow, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00046-SM Document 19 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55164-55165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (08-066)]


National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) 
Advisory Board; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the National Space-Based 
Positioning, Navigation

[[Page 55165]]

and Timing (PNT) Advisory Board. The agenda for the meeting includes 
updates from each of the three PNT Panels (Leadership, Strategic 
Engagement and Communication, Future Challenges), including discussion 
and deliberation of potential recommendations. The PNT Advisory Board 
will address U.S. Government interests in the following areas:
    <bullet> Update on Implementation of the President's 2004 U.S. 
Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Policy.
    <bullet> Overview of National Space-Based PNT Executive Committee, 
and National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
    <bullet> Status Update on Global Positioning System (GPS) 
Constellation and Modernization Plans.
    <bullet> Maintaining U.S. GPS Technological Leadership and 
Competitiveness.
    <bullet> Promoting and Branding Current and Future PNT Capabilities 
to the U.S. and International Communities.
    <bullet> Global Technical and Market Trends for PNT Services.
    <bullet> Future Areas of Study and Administration Transition.

DATES: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.; Friday October 17, 
2008, 9 a.m.-1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Arlington, 901 North Stafford Street, Arlington, VA 
22203. Phone: 703-528-6000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James J. Miller, Space Operations 
Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Washington, DC 20546. Phone 202-358-4417.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be 
held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key 
participants.

    Dated: September 18, 2008.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22491 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-172-01-SM

Douglas Heath

O R D E R

Defendant Bennett’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2007

trial period. Defendant Heath shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than May 1, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: June 27, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: July 10, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00172-SM Document 21 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

April 23, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00172-SM Document 21 Filed 04/23/07 Page 2 of 2