alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TEXAS CONSOL. THEATRES, Inc., v. PITTMAN.

No. 8343.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1938.

*204For former opinion, see 93 F.2d. 21.

W. B. Handley and C. J. Shaeffer, both of Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

Thos. E. Hayden, Jr., of Abilene, Tex., for appellee.

Before SIBLEY and HOLMES, Circuit Judges, and STRUM, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

 The motion for rehearing sets forth a compromise between the parties for a sum of money less than the judgment appealed from, which included an agreement that this court reverse the case before it and that the District Court should enter judgment denying any recovery except for costs; the compromise agreement being dated December 1, 1937. The case was argued November 3, 1937, and had been decided in conference and the opinion prepared and concurred in before December 1, but the judgment was not notified to or entered by the clerk until December 3. The parties before making the compromise had inquired of the clerk, we are informed, whether there had been any decision of the case, and he had said none had been filed. Appellate courts, before the case is taken under advisement, have respected settlements made by the parties, though they included a reversal of the judgment. Bond v. Davenport, 123 U.S. 619, 8 S.Ct. 306, 31 L.Ed. 279; Union Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Waters, 124 U.S. 369, 8 S.Ct. 510, 31 L.Ed. 474 ; 3 Am.Jur. § 1154. But, when the case is under advisement, the court has power to decide it according to its judgment and is not bound to render a judgment dictated by the parties. The judgment of the court has been rendered, and we see no sufficient reason to withdraw and change it. If, as is alleged, there has been a good faith compromise of the cause of action, it appears to us that a simple and effectual remedy to get rid of the judgment which we have affirmed is open by presenting the compromise in the District Court and having the judgment satisfied there .except as to costs.

The motion for a rehearing is denied.
EXHIBIT 99(a)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

(millions of dollars)



|                                                       |  |                                       |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- | ------ | -
|                                                       |  | Twelve Months EndedSeptember 30, 2009 |       
|Operating revenues                                     |  | $                                     | 9,729  |  
|Fuel, purchased power and delivery fees                |  |                                       | (2,899 | )
|Net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities |  |                                       | 3,435  |  
|Operating costs                                        |  |                                       | (1,554 | )
|Depreciation and amortization                          |  |                                       | (1,679 | )
|Selling, general and administrative expenses           |  |                                       | (1,037 | )
|Franchise and revenue-based taxes                      |  |                                       | (363   | )
|Impairment of goodwill                                 |  |                                       | (8,950 | )
|Other income                                           |  |                                       | 108    |  
|Other deductions                                       |  |                                       | (768   | )
|Interest income                                        |  |                                       | 35     |  
|Interest expense and related charges                   |  |                                       | (4,566 | )
|                                                       |  |                                       |        |  
|                                                       | 
|Loss before income taxes                               |  |                                       | (8,509 | )
|                                                       | 
|Income tax expense                                     |  |                                       | (245   | )
|                                                       |  |                                       |        |  
|                                                       | 
|Net loss                                               |  |                                       | (8,754 | )
|                                                       | 
|Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests      |  |                                       | 106    |  
|                                                       |  |                                       |        |  
|                                                       | 
|Net loss attributable to EFH Corp.                     |  | $                                     | (8,648 | )
|                                                       |  |                                       |        |
CERTIFICATE



As required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, (as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002), I certify that:



(1)           The Quarterly Report of Bedford Holdings, Inc. for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert Samilla

Robert Samilla

Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2003
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jay H. Cohen, Individually and as Trustee of the JHC Trust I and II v.

NewBiss Property, L.P.

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00233

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 20973A

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

A ppellant Jay H. Cohen, Individually and as Trustee of the JHC Trust I and II, has filed a

“Motion for Injunction to Preserve this Court’s Jurisdiction, or Alternatively, for Stay of

Expungem ent Orders,” regarding the trial court’ s orders dated June 29, 2011 and November 9,

2012 . The motion is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: A p ril 19, 2013
Exhibit 32(a)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, John F. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of Energy Future Holdings Corp.
(the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 5th day of November, 2008.



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNGName:

John F. YoungTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future
Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Energy Future Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NO. 07-05-0316-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 9, 2006

______________________________

STEVEN LEIJA RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 50,335-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Steven Leija Rodriguez was convicted of

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, punishment enhanced by two prior convictions,

and sentenced to 15 years confinement. We affirm.

Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion

to withdraw, counsel certifies he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the

record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id. at 744-45.
2

Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the

Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised him of his right to file a pro

se response in this matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).

The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appellant has

filed a response contending that the indictment for aggravated kidnapping violated his

constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy and that the aggravated assault with a

deadly weapon case had been previously dismissed and remained dismissed. 

We have reviewed the grounds raised by appellant’s response. We have also made

an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any other

arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.75, 80,

109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App.

2005). As a result of our review, we agree that the appeal is frivolous. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Stacy

v. 07-cv-51-PB

Johnson

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from presiding over this case as the firm of Rath, Young &

Pignatelli, PC has appeared on behalf of the defendant.

SO ORDERED.

May 1, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:07-cv-00051-SM Document 8 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-80-01/02-SM

Michael Monahan

Jeffrey Mealey

O R D E R

Defendant Monahan's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 17) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the December 2007 trial period. Defendants shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 25, 2007. On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 18 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: November 26, 2007 at 9:30 AM

Jury Selection: December 4, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 14, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

 Mark Sisti, Esq.

 William Christie, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00080-SM Document 18 Filed 05/14/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1602 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1602

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an 
   employee's ``regular rate'' for purposes of calculating overtime 
   compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

Mr. Ballenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an 
   employee's ``regular rate'' for purposes of calculating overtime 
   compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rewarding Performance in 
Compensation Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULAR RATE FOR OVERTIME PURPOSES.

    Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is amended--
            (1) by inserting before the semicolon at the end of 
        paragraph (3) the following: ``; or (d) the payments are made 
        to reward an employee or group of employees for meeting or 
        exceeding the productivity, quality, efficiency, or sales goals 
        as specified in a gainsharing plan, incentive bonus plan, 
        commission plan, or performance contingent bonus plan''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
``A plan described in clause (d) of paragraph (3) shall be in writing 
and made available to employees, provide that the amount of the 
payments to be made under the plan be based upon a formula that is 
stated in the plan, and be established and maintained in good faith for 
the purpose of distributing to employees additional remuneration over 
and above the wages and salaries that are not dependent upon the 
existence of such plan or payments made pursuant to such plan.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-5 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Leaping Group Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ziwei Xu, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: October 31, 2019
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Ziwei Xu                  
|                       |  | Name: Ziwei Xu                
|                       |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 72-6253.

#### Jackson *v.*Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  408,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,438,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,943,057
<PP&E>                                      11,717,044
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,029,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,991,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,845,760
<BONDS>                                      5,079,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,377,546
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,311,660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,991,277
<SALES>                                      1,350,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,350,240
<CGS>                                        1,082,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             205,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (265,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (265,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (265,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Covance Inc. (“Covance”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William E. Klitgaard,Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Covance,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Covance.

 

Date: May 9, 2006
|        | /s/    | William E. Klitgaard            |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |   | William E. Klitgaard            |
|   |   | Corporate Senior Vice President |
|   |   | and Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            7709
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        187
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,598
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,634
<LOANS>                                         95,245
<ALLOWANCE>                                        338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,668
<DEPOSITS>                                      82,611
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                742
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 110,668
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,752
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  325
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   196
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,272
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,809
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 376
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,088
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,119
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,119
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.99
<LOANS-NON>                                        221
<LOANS-PAST>                                       438
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      104
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  338
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               338
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>