alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mrs. Lydia DARES, Divorced Wife of Paul D. O’Donnell, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Paul D. O’DONNELL, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14550.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 24, 1933.

For former opinion, see 14'7 So. 99.

Legier, McEnemy & Waguespack, of New Orleans, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moved the dismissal of this appeal, asserting that no suspensive appeal bond was filed and calling attention to certain clerical omissions in the bond, which was filed.

In our original opinion (147 So. 99) we discussed the various contentions presented by appellee and we held that none of the objections urged was sufficient to dismiss the appeal. We further said that, even had any of the technical objections been well founded, we could not have sustained those objections because of the fact that they had not been presented in the court below.

In the application for rehearing appellee now suggests that we were in error in stat*711ing that the objections referred to had not been presented in the court below and her counsel advises us in a brief that the reasons presented to us for the dismissal of the appeal had also been urged upon the court below in support of a motion to rescind the order granting the appeal.

Manifestly we could have had no knowledge of the fact that there had been filed in the court below a motion to rescind the order of appeal because that motion was not filed in the district court until the very day on which the transcript of appeal was lodged in this court. But counsel for appellee is in error in supposing that when we overruled the motion to dismiss the appeal we did so primarily because of our belief that objection to the bond had not been made in the court below. An examination of. our opinion will show that we considered each of the objections urged and found no merit in any of them, or, at least, no sufficient merit to warrant the dismissal of the appeal.

Had there been raised the Question of the sufficiency of the surety that Question, being one of fact, would necessarily have been sent back to the district court for consideration. But each of the objections presented only a question of law, for consideration of which there was no necessity that the matter be remanded.

The rehearing requested is denied.

Rehearing denied.
#### Colleen Ruston Miccio, Respondent, v Fits Systems, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[810 NYS2d 13]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J.), entered February 14, 2005, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the first and second causes of action as time-barred insofar as based on acts that occurred before June 18, 2001, the third and fifth causes of action in their entirety, and the claim for punitive damages under the first cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

There is no merit to defendants’ argument that the first cause of action for sexual harassment is barred because plaintiff did not file a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights within one year after the alleged acts of harassment (Executive Law § 297 [1], [5], [9]). However, the cause of action is time-barred insofar as based on acts that occurred more than three years before commencement of the action (CPLR 214 [2]), i.e., before June 18, 2001, and we modify accordingly. The second cause of action alleging disparate compensation due to plaintiffs sex and marital status is, insofar as based on the federal Equal Pay Act (29 USC § 206 [d]; *see Pollis v New School for Social Research,*132 F3d 115, 118 [2d Cir 1997]), time-barred with respect to compensation allegedly earned before June 18, 2001. Although a violation of the Equal Pay Act is generally subject to a two-year limitations period, a three-year period applies if the violation was willful (29 USC § 255 [a]), i.e., the lower compensation was motivated by an intention to discriminate; whether a violation was willful is an issue of fact for the jury *(see Pollis,*132 F3d at 119-120). We note that a compensatory damage award for a willful violation is to be doubled *(id.*at 120). The allegations relating to the Equal Pay Act also suffice to state a cause of action under the Human Rights Law. Whether, as defendants claim, plaintiff was no longer their employee as of May 1, 2000, but became an independent contractor to whom neither the Human Rights Law nor the Equal Pay Act applied, is a jury question. The allegations in the third cause of action are virtually identical to those in the second, and we accord*440ingly dismiss the third cause of action as redundant. The fifth cause of action, alleging “harassment, annoyance, inconvenience,” fails to state a cause of action. Punitive damages are not recoverable under the first cause of action alleging violations of the Human Rights Law unrelated to housing discrimination (Executive Law § 297 [9]), but are recoverable under the fourth cause of action alleging a tortious wrongful discharge *(cf. Swersky v Dreyer & Traub,*219 AD2d 321, 328-329 [1996], *appeal withdrawn*89 NY2d 983 [1997]). We have considered and rejected defendants’ other contentions. Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1993...... 100.0 80.7 15.8 2.8 .6 .1 ...

1994...... 100.0 85.5 12.3 1.9 .2 .1 .0

1995...... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

1994: Q4... 100.0 85.5 12.3 1.9 .2 .1 .0

1995: Q1... 100.0 81.6 15.3 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 82.0 15.0 2.6 .2 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.8 14.3 2.4 .3 .0 .1

 Q4... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996: Q1... 100.0 78.1 17.4 3.6 .6 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 78.0 17.2 4.0 .6 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .5 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997: Q1... 100.0 79.1 16.7 3.7 .4 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.5 15.8 3.2 .3 ... .1

 Q3... 100.0 81.8 15.2 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998: Q1... 100.0 80.6 16.3 2.8 .1 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Deborah Wolf

v. Case No. 05-cv-66-PB

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

ORDER

The Court having ordered on 8/12/05, that the funds to be deposited by Met Life be

accepted by the Clerk and deposited into the Registry of the Court until further notice,

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk:

1. Cause the funds to be invested in the Court Registry Investment

System;

2. Deduct a registry fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the interest earned

on said funds pursuant to the directive of the Judicial Conference of the

United States; and

3. Deduct the registry fee prior to the disbursement of funds without

further order of the Court.

August 16, 2005 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Paul C. English, Esq.

William D. Pandolph, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00066-PB Document 16 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00004-CV

City of Austin, Appellant

v.

National Media Corporation and ACME Partnership, L.P., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-10-003997, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant City of Austin has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss, explaining

that the trial court’s orders that are the subject of this interlocutory appeal are now merged into the

trial court’s final judgment, which has been appealed by both parties in a different cause number.

We grant the motion and dismiss the interlocutory appeal, and, as requested by appellant, we note

in our Court records that the City of Austin will remain as the cross-appellant in cause number

03-16-00839-CV. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 7, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cv-276-PB

J. Eugene Felch, et al.

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated April 7, 2008.

SO ORDERED.

May 7, 2008 _________________________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: James Brown, Esq.

J. Eugene Felch

Case 1:06-cv-00276-PB Document 21 Filed 05/07/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Bonnie Usher

v. Case No. 07-cv-42-SM

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41.1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with 

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

November 14, 2008 ________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Jennifer Jones, Esq. 

Mary Notaris, Esq. 

Lee Stephen MacPhee, Esq. 

Case 1:07-cv-00042-SM Document 15 Filed 11/14/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EAGLE
WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                  26,658
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                              5,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        34,602
<PP&E>                                   2,016
<DEPRECIATION>                             710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          47,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,853
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                    24
<OTHER-SE>                              44,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            47,802
<SALES>                                  3,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,076
<CGS>                                    1,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            658
<INCOME-TAX>                               214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        444
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.02


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Resource Management Company

v.

Frank Gregory

Civil No. 06-cv-366-JD

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated May 14, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

June 11, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Benjamin Riggs, Jr.

Douglas Gould, Esq.

Joshua Menard, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 77 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 1
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-14-01020-CR OFFENSE: 31.07

Jose Ramiro Delarosa v. The State

STYLE: 0fTexas COUNTY: Dallas

mok-m

COA DISPOSITION: DISMISSED TRIAL COURT: 283rd Judicial District Court

DATE: 10/2/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1452888-T

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Jose Ramiro Delarosa v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

S-tef^.s Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: ^fAtJiMfy

JUDGE: fii^ fMsU*^- ^^

H

CCA #: _

CCA Disposition: p/fA

DATE: Yt?*?-^

JUDGE: /tfC/*#AJ>S»^

SIGNED: PC: _

PUBLISH: DNP:

on: frM'ff ^a,/Ao^

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
IB

Union Calendar No. 215

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1712

[Report No. 107–372]

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make minor adjustments to

the boundary of the National Park of American Samoa to include certain

portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosega within the park, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

MARCH 12, 2002

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 3, 2001]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make minor

adjustments to the boundary of the National Park of

American Samoa to include certain portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosega within the park, and for other

purposes.
2

•HR 1712 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT OF THE NATIONAL

4 PARK OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

5 Section 2(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish

6 the National Park of American Samoa’’ (16 U.S.C. 410qq–

7 1(b)), approved October 31, 1988, is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’, ‘‘(2)’’, and ‘‘(3)’’ and in9 serting ‘‘(A)’’, ‘‘(B)’’, and ‘‘(C)’’, respectively;

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘INCLUDED.—’’; and

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new para12 graph:

13 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may make adjustments to the

14 boundary of the park to include within the park certain

15 portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosega, as depicted on

16 the map entitled ‘National Park of American Samoa, Pro17 posed Boundary Adjustment’, numbered 82,035 and dated

18 February 2002, pursuant to an agreement with the Gov19 ernor of American Samoa and contingent upon the lease

20 to the Secretary of the newly added lands. As soon as prac21 ticable after a boundary adjustment under this paragraph,

22 the Secretary shall modify the maps referred to in para23 graph (1) accordingly.’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to authorize

the Secretary of the Interior to make adjustments to the

boundary of the National Park of American Samoa to in-
3

•HR 1712 RH

clude certain portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosega

within the park, and for other purposes.’’.
Union Calendar No. 215

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1712

[Report No. 107–372]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make

minor adjustments to the boundary of the National Park of American Samoa to include certain portions of the islands of Ofu and Olosegawithin the park, and for other purposes.

MARCH 12, 2002

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee

of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 132 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 132

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, as the ``Goro Hokama 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, as the ``Goro Hokama 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GORO HOKAMA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Goro Hokama Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Goro Hokama 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ending  November  30,  2003 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Weisman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 3, 2004

/S/David A. Weisman
David A. Weisman,
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Verle Cameron

v.

U.S. Social Security Administration,

Commissioner

No. 07-fp-075

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-075-PB.

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 23, 2007

cc: Raymond J. Kelly, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00075-PB Document 3 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,878,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,878,086
<PP&E>                                          54,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,932,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,789,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,932,981
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,053
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,468)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (16.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (16.91)
        

</TABLE>
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2015


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: August 11, 2015
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------