alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54178-54179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21904]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, at 12:30 p.m.; and 
Wednesday, September 24, 2008, at 8:30 a.m. and 11 a.m.

Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

Status: September 23--12:30 p.m.--Closed; September 24--8:30 a.m.--
Open; September 24--11 a.m.--Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 

Tuesday, September 23 at 12:30 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Financial Update.
    2. Fiscal Year 2009 Integrated Financial Plan Briefing.
    3. Fiscal Year 2009 Goals and Performance Assessment.
    4. Product Pricing.
    5. Strategic Issues.
    6. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    7. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Wednesday, September 24 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meetings, May 6-7, and July 28-29, 2008.
    2. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board.
    3. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    4. Committee Reports.
    5. Financial Update.
    6. Preliminary Fiscal Year 2010 Appropriation Request.
    7. Capital Investments.
    a. Distribution Quality Improvement (DQI) Program.
    b. San Francisco, California, Townsend Carrier Annex.
    8. Vision 2013--Five-Year Strategic Plan.
    9. Board of Governors Bylaw Amendments.
    10. National Identity Crimes Law Enforcement Network.
    11. Tentative Agenda for the November 12-13, 2008, meeting in 
Washington, DC.

[[Page 54179]]

Wednesday, September 24 at 11:00 a.m. (Closed)--If Needed

    1. Continuation of Tuesday's closed session agenda.

Contact Person for More Information: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21904 Filed 9-16-08; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 2018


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: May 22, 2019
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. 06-cr-208-04-JD

Tyler James

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

51) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: March 1, 2007

cc: James Gleason, Esq.

Scott Kalisch, Esq.

Kenneth P. Glidden, Esq.

Ash S. Joshi, Esq.

John Pendleton, Esq.

Sven Wiberg, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00208-JD Document 53 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00208-JD Document 53 Filed 03/01/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO



18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Wealthbridge Acquisition Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                        
| |    | Date: April 1, 2019                                                                                                                                    



| | /s/Yongsheng
    Liu             
| | ---------------------------------
| | Yongsheng Liu                    
| | Chief Executive
    Officer      
| | (Principal executive
    officer)



Date:
April 1, 2019



| | /s/Xiaoyan
    Tang                             
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | Xiaoyan Tang                                    
| | Chief Financial
    Officer                     
| | (Principal financial
    and accounting officer)





3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-181-01-SM

John Teves

O R D E R

Defendant Teves’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 38). Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2007 trial

period. Defendant Teves shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

May 22, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: September 28, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: October 10, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 39 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 11, 2007

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Joseph Laplante, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 39 Filed 05/11/07 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 170

To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used computer

equipment to public elementary and secondary schools designated by

the members.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used computer equipment to public elementary and

secondary schools designated by the members.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

H.L.C.

.....................................................................

(Original Signature of Member)

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. ll

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on lllllllllllllll

A BILL

To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used computer equipment to public elementary and

secondary schools designated by the members.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

H.L.C.

1 SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEMBERS OF HOUSE OF REP2 RESENTATIVES TO DONATE USED COMPUTER

3 EQUIPMENT TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(a)(3) of the Legisla5 tive Branch Appropriations Act, 1987 (as incorporated by

6 reference in section 101(j) of Public Law 99–500 and

7 Public Law 99–591) (2 U.S.C. 117e(3)) is amended to

8 read as follows:

9 ‘‘(3)(A) At the request of a member of the House

10 of Representatives, in the case of equipment consisting of

11 computers and related peripheral tools previously used by

12 the member, the Clerk may donate the equipment to a

13 public elementary or secondary school (as defined in sec14 tion 14101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education

15 Act of 1965) without regard to whether the donation

16 meets the requirements of the second sentence of para17 graph (2).

18 ‘‘(B) At the request of the member who previously

19 used the equipment, if the Clerk donates equipment under

20 this paragraph, the Clerk shall donate the equipment to

21 a school designated by the member.’’.

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

23 subsection (a) shall take effect October 1, 2001.

Æ
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2020


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: July 17, 2020
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 22, 2022


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2018-B
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1992...... 2.69 .35 .25 1.67 .18 .24 1.67 .54 .37 .11 1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2000: Q2... 2.27 .12 .19 1.56 .18 .22 1.28 .54 .33 .11  Q3... 1.86 .09 .15 1.29 .12 .20 1.10 .43 .26 .08  Q4... 1.59 .14 .19 .96 .11 .19 .90 .35 .26 .08 

2001: Q1... 1.63 .12 .17 .97 .14 .23 .84 .37 .30 .11 

 Q2... 2.16 .13 .19 1.34 .16 .34 1.23 .49 .32 .12  Q3... 1.66 .09 .13 1.09 .12 .23 1.00 .36 .23 .08  Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 

2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 

 Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1741 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1741

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial 
operation of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply 
                       with stage 3 noise levels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2001

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial 
operation of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply 
                       with stage 3 noise levels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT CATEGORY 
              AIRCRAFT.

    Beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation shall prohibit the commercial operation of 
a civil supersonic transport category aircraft to or from an airport in 
the United States unless the Secretary finds that the aircraft complies 
with stage 3 noise levels.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

d1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139269 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139269 

 COA: 290139 

Wayne CC: 05-000168 

ERIC GIVAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 18

May 14, 2002

Board of Directors DeCODE genetics, Inc.

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2002. The notes to the financial statements describe
a change in accounting principle from recognizing certain revenues under the
retrospective method to the milestone payment method. It should be understood
that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for
revenue recognition for these types of revenues has not been addressed in any
authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we
have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting
principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our
discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business
planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such
change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable
accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
20.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 2001. Accordingly, our comments are
subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements
covering the period of the accounting change.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers ehf.

PricewaterhouseCoopers ehf.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christina Margaret Porter, 

Deceased, by Brent M. Porter

and Mary M. Salstrom, as 

Administrators of her Estate

and Individually

v. Case No. 07-cv-28-PB

Darmouth College and 

John/Jane Doe Defendants 1-10

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this matter and direct

the clerk to assign the case to another judge. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 13, 2009

cc: Bradford Atwood, Esq.

K. William Clauson, Esq.

Angela Collinson, Esq.

Matthew Johnson, Esq.

Kevin Murphy, Esq.

Thomas B.S. Quarles, Jr., Esq.

Charles Raubicheck, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 88 Filed 10/13/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randal Fritz

v. Case No. 06-cv-191-PB

Katharine Daly, et al

O R D E R

The plaintiff has failed to comply with the Order dated November 8, 2006, accordingly

the case is dismissed as to John Doe and Jane Doe.

SO ORDERED.

January 10, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Pierre Rumpf, Esq.

Paula Werme, Esq.

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Debra Weiss Ford, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00191-PB Document 32 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chukwuma E. Azubuko

v.

All Defendants

Case No. 06-mc-062-SM

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s latest complaint fails to establish subject

matter jurisdiction and there clearly is no personal

jurisdiction. The Clerk is ordered to reject the filing in

accordance with Chief Judge McAuliffe’s order of November 28,

2006.

SO ORDERED.

R. Muirhead

ited States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 8, 2006

cc: Chukwuma E. Azubuko, pro se

Case 1:06-mc-00062-SM Document 6 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Eugene Williams

Criminal No . 06-cr-161-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

27) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3131 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : October 9, 200 7

cc : Richard Foley, Esq .

Jennifer Davis, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00161-JD Document 28 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Roland Chretien

v. Civil No. 07-cv-044-JM

Bruce W. Cattell, Warden,

New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Roland Chretien filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

in this Court on February 20, 2007 (document no. 1) raising four

claims. That petition demonstrated exhaustion for only one of

the four claims raised. On February 22, 2007, I directed

Chretien to amend his petition to demonstrate that the remaining

three claims had been properly exhausted (document no. 2). 

Chretien filed “Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief in Support of

application for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (document no. 3) on March

15, 2007, demonstrating that two additional claims had been

exhausted. On April 3, 2007, I again directed Chretien to amend

his petition to demonstrate exhaustion of the fourth claim, or to

choose to either forego that claim or return to the State courts

to complete exhaustion (document no. 4).

Case 1:07-cv-00044-JL Document 6 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 3
2

On April 12, 2007, Chretien filed “Petitioner’s Second

Supplemental Brief in Support of Application for Writ of Habeas

Corpus” (document no. 5). This additional filing aptly

demonstrates exhaustion of the fourth claim, including the

federal nature of the claim, in the State courts. Accordingly, I

find that for purposes of preliminary review, Chretien has

sufficiently demonstrated exhaustion of the four claims raised in

his habeas petition to allow the matter to proceed at this time.

I direct that Chretien’s petition be served on the

Respondent. See § 2254 Rule 4. The Respondent shall file an

answer or other pleading in response to the allegations made

therein. See id. (requiring reviewing judge to order a response

to the petition). The Clerk’s office is directed to serve the

New Hampshire Office of the Attorney General, as provided in the

Agreement on Acceptance of Service, copies of this Order and the

habeas petition (document no. 1). Respondent shall answer or

otherwise plead within thirty (30) days of the date of this

Order. The answer shall comply with the requirements of § 2254

Rule 5 (setting forth contents of the answer). Upon receipt of

the response, the Court will determine whether a hearing is 

Case 1:07-cv-00044-JL Document 6 Filed 05/16/07 Page 2 of 3
3

warranted. See § 2254 Rule 8 (providing circumstances under

which a hearing is appropriate). 

Petitioner is referred to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, which requires

that every pleading, written motion, notice, and similar paper,

after the petition, shall be served on all parties. Such service

is to be made by mailing the material to the parties’ attorneys.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 16, 2007

cc: Thomas L. Gleason, Esq.

Scott Gleason, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00044-JL Document 6 Filed 05/16/07 Page 3 of 3
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2007


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------