alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3.12 U.S. RESERVE ASSETS

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2002 2003 2004

2005 2006

Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar.p

1 Total ................................. 79,006 85,938 86,824 72,243 71,273 70,218 68,773 65,125 65,594 65,365 65,355

2 Gold stock1 ............................ 11,043 11,043 11,045 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,043 11,044 11,044 11,044

3 Special drawing rights2,3 ................. 12,166 12,638 13,582 8,304 8,245 8,224 8,180 8,210 8,302 8,310 8,344

4 Reserve position in International Monetary Fund2 ............................ 21,979 22,535 19,479 13,336 13,245 12,720 12,097 8,036 7,639 7,638 7,376

5 Foreign currencies4 ..................... 33,818 39,722 42,718 39,563 38,742 38,234 37,445 37,839 38,609 38,372 38,592

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF have also been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2002 2003 2004

2005 2006

Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar.p

1 Deposits .............................. 136 162 80 81 96 88 82 83 83 82 84

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 678,106 845,080 1,041,215 1,075,098 1,056,594 1,060,857 1,073,710 1,069,014 1,080,198 1,105,178 1,103,810

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 9,045 8,971 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
**Certification        Pursuant to**

**18        U.S.C. Section 1350**

|   | 1. | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Broadband, Inc. for the                  three-month                  period ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and                  Exchange                  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Eagle                  Broadband, Inc. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7124

JOSEPH P. STICH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-837-R) Submitted: November 30, 1998 Decided: December 23, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John M. DiJoseph, KAVRUKOV, MEHROTRA & DIJOSEPH, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Kathleen B. Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Stich v. Angelone , No. CA-96-837-R (W.D. Va., filed June 30, 1998; entered July 1, 1998). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, 79(a). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel BELTRAN-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-10517. D.C. No. CR-02-05215-OWW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 24, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Samuel Beltran-Romero appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being an alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Beltran-Romero has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. BeltranRomero has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 4, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 4, 2006
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 32(b)



                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CFO


     The undersigned,  Kirk R. Oliver,  Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial  Officer of TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

  1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
     2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 6th day of August, 2004.




                                                /s/ Kirk R. Oliver
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Name:   Kirk R. Oliver
                                           Title:  Executive Vice President
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1992...... 8.9 6.1 9.5 8.6 20.1 9.4 8.3 9.7 11.1 7.2 

1993...... 9.2 7.3 9.6 8.3 30.4 9.4 8.5 10.0 11.1 7.4 

1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 

2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 

2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2000: Q2... 11.6 9.7 9.3 10.1 22.3 13.4 10.8 11.9 11.7 11.6 

 Q3... 11.1 6.7 14.8 9.1 30.7 10.2 9.0 11.2 10.2 11.9 

 Q4... 10.6 7.2 9.7 7.9 25.8 14.5 8.9 10.5 11.5 10.5 

2001: Q1... 18.7 8.7 18.6 12.4 30.6 25.9 9.9 13.3 13.5 23.0 

 Q2... 11.8 8.1 16.9 10.2 14.0 12.8 11.1 11.9 12.5 11.6  Q3... 11.0 6.8 10.7 8.6 32.3 11.3 9.1 11.2 11.8 10.9  Q4... 10.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 31.4 9.9 7.6 11.1 12.1 10.3 2002: Q1... 11.7 9.3 9.7 10.9 29.8 10.8 10.0 12.4 14.6 10.3  Q2... 13.4 11.3 19.6 10.6 27.7 16.8 10.2 12.6 14.2 13.8  Q3... 9.9 6.3 8.0 9.8 12.7 10.6 9.4 9.4 10.6 9.7  Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3 

 Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 

 Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin D. Hall

v . Civil No. 05-cv-381-JD

Cheshire County Department of Corrections ,

Superintendent, et al.

ORDE R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated February 10, 2006 .

SO ORDERED.

February 28, 2006

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Kevin D. Hall, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00381-JD Document 14 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:05-cv-00050-PB   Document 12   Filed 03/14/06   Page 1 of 1
217 La. 818

#### STATE v. THOMAS et al.

No. 39899.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1950.

Fuller & Harrison, of Winnfield, for appellants.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sam L. Wells, Dist. Atty., of Colfax, for appellee.

LE BLANC, Justice.

On information filed by the District Attorney, the defendants, Herman Davis and George Thomas, were jointly charged with the offense of' unlawfully possessing, handling and transporting for sale for beverage purposes -intoxicating liquors, in violation of the Parish-wide Local Option Ordinance of the Parish of Winn and upon conviction they were each sentenced to pay a fine of $325 and costs and in default of payment to imprisonment in the Parish jail for a period of four months. This appeal was taken from the judgment which so sentenced them.

During the trial of the case and after conviction, the defendants reserved bills of exception to the ruling of the Court on various motions filed on their behalf but none of these bills were perfected and they have made no appearance here either by brief or otherwise.

We have examined the record and find no error patent on its face. In the absence of any such error and of any bills of exception, there is no alternative other than to affirm the conviction and sentence and, accordingly, it is so ordered.
ic"( cOURT

MAINE

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT`' .

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Northwest Bypass Group ;

Morton C . Tuttle ;

Carolyn H . Tuttle ; and

Leslie J . Ludtke ,

Plaintiff s

V .

US Army Corps of Engineers ;

Lt . General Carl A . Strock ,

Chief Engineer of the

US Army Corps of Engineers ;

Colonel Curtis Phalken ,

New England District

Commander of the US Army

Corps of Engineers ; and

City of Concord, New Hampshir e

V .

Concord Hospital, and

St . Paul's School ,

Intervenor Defendants

O R D E R

Civil No . 06-cv-258-J D

All of the judges in this district were recused from

presiding over this case . Accordingly, the case shall be

referred to the District of Maine ; sitting by designation .

The recusal of all of the judges on this court gives rise to

an "emergency" with respect to the referred case as that term is

used in 28 U .S .C . § 636(f) . I therefore concur in the assignment

Case 1:06-cv-00258-JAW Document 43 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 3
of a magistrate judge from the designated district to perform th e

duties specified in 28 U .S .C . § 636(a)-(c) .

SO ORDERED .

September 6, 200 6

cc : Clerk, USDC, Main e

Gordon R . Blakeney, Jr ., Esq .

Daniel R . Dertke, Esq .

Samantha Klein, Esq .

John P . Almeida, Esq .

E . Tupper Kinder, Esq .

Bruce W . Felmly, Esq .

Gregory H . Smith, Esq .

2

Case 1:06-cv-00258-JAW Document 43 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 3
Concurring Orde r

I concur that an emergency exists as specified above and

that for the duration of this case Magistrate Judge Jf f Vc N ZAK

is assigned to perform such duties under 28 U .S .C . § 636(a)-(c)

as may be assigned to-1A by the district judge to whom this cas e

is assigned .

Date :

cc : Gordon R . Blakeney, Jr ., Esq .

Daniel R . Dertke, Esq .

Samantha Klein, Esq .

John P . Almeida, Esq .

E . Tupper Kinder, Esq .

Bruce W . Felmly, Esq .

Gregory H . Smith, Esq .

3

Case 1:06-cv-00258-JAW Document 43 Filed 09/15/06 Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2014

s0121

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2014

146872

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146872

COA: 308275

Wayne CC: 03-011966-FH

THOMAS CLIFFORD WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On January 15, 2014, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the January 24, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the 

Wayne Circuit Court’s January 11, 2012 orders. Under the unique circumstances of this 

case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion, see People v Bylsma, 493 Mich 17, 26 

(2012), and People v Brown, 492 Mich 684, 688 (2012), when it set aside the defendant’s 

guilty plea, dismissed the case with prejudice, and vacated the defendant’s sentence.
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1 estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2001: Q3... 8.1 8.0 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.5 7.4 n.a. 7.2

2002: Q1... 7.5 7.3 n.a. 7.2

 Q2... 7.3 7.3 n.a. 7.1

 Q3... 7.2 7.2 n.a. 6.8

 Q4... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.5

2003: Q1... 6.7 6.6 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.0

 Q3... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.1

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2001: Q3... 9.2 9.2 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.0

2002: Q1... 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.0

 Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.2 7.8

 Q3... 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.8

 Q4... 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.5

2003: Q1... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.5

 Q2... 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.6

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2001: Q3... 8.2 7.9 8.0 7.6

 Q4... 9.9 7.2 7.2 7.0

2002: Q1... 7.0 7.1 9.4 7.3

 Q2... 7.5 7.3 7.5 7.2

 Q3... 7.3 6.9 7.3 7.2

 Q4... 6.8 6.7 7.0 6.7

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6

 Q2... 6.8 6.4 6.4 6.4

 Q3... 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.5
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1 -estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2001: Q3... n.a. 8.6 8.5 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.1 8.2 7.6

2002: Q1... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.5

 Q2... n.a. 8.1 8.0 7.7

 Q3... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.5

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2003: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.3 6.9

 Q3... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.8

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2001: Q3... n.a. 8.9 9.0 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 8.2 8.0 7.6

2002: Q1... n.a. 7.6 7.8 7.3

 Q2... n.a. 7.6 7.7 7.4

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.2

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.2 6.9

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2001: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

2003: Q1... n.a. 7.0 7.8 7.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.1 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 6.5 7.0 7.2

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1643 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1643

 To provide for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Israeli Capital Recognition Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES POLICY REGARDING JERUSALEM AS THE CAPITAL OF 
              ISRAEL.

    (a) Consulate in Jerusalem.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the United States shall not operate a United States consulate or 
diplomatic facility in Jerusalem unless such consulate or diplomatic 
facility is under the supervision of the United States Ambassador to 
Israel.
    (b) Identification of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel in 
Official Government Publications.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, any official government document which lists countries and 
their capital cities shall identify Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
    (c) Record of Place of Birth as Israel for Passport Purposes.--For 
purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or 
issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of 
Jerusalem, the Secretary of State shall, upon the request of the 
citizen, record the place of birth as Israel.
                                 <all>
```
#### R. C. ERDLE et al., Appellants, v. John F. KEEFE et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Dec. 15, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1954.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade .County; George E. Holt, Judge.

Affirmed.