alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0.5 DISTRICT CN T

DISTRICT OF N .H. FILE D

10Q6 JON I S A I I : q 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

USA

V.

Honda Accord 2000, et at .

Civil No. 06-cv-33-JD

ORDE R

Upon application of Nay Eth and finding that under 18 U .S.C . § 983(b)(2)(a) the applicant

is financially unable to obtain representation by counsel in this case regarding real property subject

to forfeiture that is being used by the applicant as a primary residence, and on consent of the Legal

Services Corporation that Kevin Sharkey, Esq . may provide representation to the applicant on its

behalf, the court orders that pursuant to 18 U .S.C . § 983 the Legal Services Corporation shall

provide counsel to the applicant and that Attorney Kevin Sharkey shall be such counsel .

Furthermore, it is hereby ordered that any judgment for fees and costs for LSC pursuant to

18 U.S .C. § 983(b)(2)(B) shall be awarded to Attorney Kevin Sharkey or the Legal Services

Corporation subject to the submission of appropriate statements of such fees and costs and the

consent of the Legal Services Corporation .

Case 1:06-cv-00033-JD Document 46 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 2
Attorney Kevin Sharkey shall promptly file an appearance in this matter on behalf of Na y

Eth.

SO ORDERED.

June /S, 2006

cc : Jean Weld, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Brian Tucker, Esq.

Vanthan R. Un, Esq.

Kevin Sharkey, Esq.

United States District Judge

oseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

2

Case 1:06-cv-00033-JD Document 46 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1574]


Grant of Authority For Subzone Status

Banner Pharmacaps, Inc.

(Prescription Pharmaceuticals and Soft Gelatin Capsules)

High Point, North Carolina

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    WHEREAS, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for `` . . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    WHEREAS, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    WHEREAS, the Piedmont Triad Partnership, grantee of FTZ 230, has 
made application to the Board for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status at the pharmaceutical manufacturing plant of 
Banner Pharmacaps, Inc., located in High Point, North Carolina (FTZ 
Docket 8-2008, filed 2/12/08);
    WHEREAS, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (73 FR 10421, 2/27/08); and,
    WHEREAS, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to certain prescription pharmaceutical 
product and soft gelatin capsule manufacturing at the Banner 
Pharmacaps, Inc., facility located in High Point, North Carolina 
(Subzone 230C), as described in the application and Federal Register 
notice, and subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.28.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2\nd\ day of September 2008.

David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration.
Alternate Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21847 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Graham

v.

NH State Prison, Warden, et al.

06-cv-453-JD

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 31, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

February 23 , 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: William Graham, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00453-JD Document 12 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 1
NO. PD-0287-15

TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

No. 01-13-01028-CR

LESLE MARKLE

Appeal from Cause Number 1865367

From the County Criminal Court No. 12

Harris County

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

APPELLANT’S FINAL MOTION FOR EXTENSION

FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH PDR

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, LESLE MARKLE, and files this Motion to Extend Time to File PDR, and 

in support thereof, would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.

The First Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion styled

Markle v. State, 01-13-01028-CR, 2015 WL 505194 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

Feb. 5, 2015, no. pet. One other motion for extension has been granted.

II.

In compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.2(c), this motion for 

extension is timely filed within 15 days of the original deadline for the PDR, which 

was April 8, 2015. Appellant requests this extension due to the fact that counsel for 

Appellant has recently been ill for a protracted period of time, along with counsel’s 

husband and child as well. This has interrupted counsel’s work schedule as she has 

additionally been engaged in work in the Harris County Public Defender’s Office on 

many cases, including the following:

 Lenin Lopez, 01-13-01079-CR, reversed and set for retrial in cause #1403196

 Vincent William, #1420283

PD-0287-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/22/2015 4:32:24 PM

Accepted 4/23/2015 10:13:52 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
 Darryle Robertson, 14-15-00132-CR

 Rodney Robins, 01-14-00582-CR

 Craig Beal, 01-12-00896-CR

 Abner Washington, 01-14-00885-CR

 Forest Penton, 14-14-00406-CR

 Leonard Storemski, 14-14-00920-CR

 Felix Irizarry, 14-14-00827-CR

 Eddie Aldape, 14-14-00996-CR

 Counsel has been researching and writing for several trial cases assigned to the 

Public Defender’s Office Trial Division.

III.

Appellee’s attorney requests this extension of 14 days, which is necessary so that the 

PDR can be thoroughly written and timely filed. This motion is not made for the 

purpose of delay.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellee prays that this Honorable Court 

grants this requested extension of time to file the PDR in the above cause and extend 

the time for filing to April 22, 2015, the date of e-filing, or whatever date the filing is 

officiated.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

/s/ Sarah V. Wood 

 SARAH V. WOOD

Assistant Public Defender 

Harris County, Texas

Texas Bar Number 24048898
1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

713.368.0016 (phone)

713.368.9278 (fax)

Sarah.Wood@pdo.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

By my signature below, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing Appellant’s Final Motion to Extend Time to File PDR has been served via 

the efile service on the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ Sarah V. Wood 

Sarah V. Wood
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-16-00890-CV

Praise Deliverance Church 

v.

Jelinis, LLC and Hreal Companyy, LLC

NO. 1080764 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 3 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$15.00

$110.70

$251.00

$175.00

$30.00

11/02/2017

11/17/2016

11/16/2016

11/15/2016

11/15/2016

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$581.70.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this 25th day of May, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Philip Giroux

v. Civil No. 06-cv-250-PB

Town of Danbury, et al

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated October 31, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

December 27, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Philip Giroux, pro se

Daniel J. Mullen, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00250-PB Document 14 Filed 12/27/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Pheasant Lane Realty Trust 

v. Civil No. 07-cv-4-JL

Pawsenclaws & Co., LLC et al 

J U D G M E N T

In accordance with the December 5, 2008 Order of District Judge Joseph N. Laplante

dismissing the case with prejudice, judgment is hereby entered.

By the Court,

 /s/ James R. Starr

James R. Starr, Clerk

December 10, 2008

cc: William B. Pribis, Esq.

Jennifer A. O’Brien, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00004-JL Document 27 Filed 12/10/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 033-26032) and Amendment No. 67 to the 1940 Act Registration
    Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-04882), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 24, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity
    Account E for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

   

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  September 6, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1599 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1599

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold as 
                    part of an educational program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold as 
                    part of an educational program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agriculture Education Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED ON SALE OF 
              ANIMALS WHICH ARE RAISED AND SOLD AS PART OF EDUCATIONAL 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by redesignating section 139 as section 
140 and by inserting after section 138 the following new section:

``SEC. 139. PROCEEDS OF SALE OF ANIMALS RAISED AND SOLD AS PART OF 
              EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.

    ``In the case of an individual, gross income shall not include any 
gain from the sale of any animal which is raised and sold by such 
individual as part of such individual's participation in--
            ``(1) the 4-H program under the Cooperative State Research, 
        Education, and Extension Service of the Department of 
        Agriculture,
            ``(2) the Future Farmers of America,
            ``(3) any program of an organization described in section 
        501(c) and exempt from tax under section 501(a) which is 
        similar to such 4-H program or the Future Farmers of America, 
        or
            ``(4) any program of an educational organization described 
        in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part III is 
amended by striking the last item and inserting the following new 
items:

                              ``Sec. 139. Proceeds of sale of animals 
                                        raised and sold as part of 
                                        educational program.
                              ``Sec. 140. Cross references to other 
                                        Acts.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales in taxable years ending after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. C.06-cv-211-JM

Nancy R. Berry

R E C U S A L O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from the above captioned case due to the appearance of Scott

H. Harris, Esq. and Steven J. Dutton, Esq. of McLane, Graf, Raulerson, and Middleton, my

previous firm. 

SO ORDERED.

September 15, 2006 /s/ James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Steven J. Dutton, Esq.

Scott H. Harris, Esq.

Karen A. Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00211-JD Document 6 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 1
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Raymond Musci                                                |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   |   | Raymond Musci                                                    |   |
|               |   |   | Executive Vice President and DirectorPrincipal Executive Officer |   |

| Date: May 16, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Thomas Plotts       |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|               |   |   | Thomas Plotts           |   |
|               |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

      I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.

                                 /s/ E. James Ferland
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                 E. James Ferland
                                 Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 August 1, 2006
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MILOS PUACA,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3173

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-0432-12-0595-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Milos Puaca moves for a 60-day extension of time, 

until December 16, 2014, to file his opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted.

Case: 14-3173 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2014
2 PUACA v. DVA

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

Case: 14-3173 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 10/16/2014
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11048

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KARAPET TER-VARTANYAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:95-CR-118-R)

August 2, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Karapet Ter-Vartanyan appeals his conviction and sentence for unauthorized use of an access

device in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2). He argues that the district court erred in denying him

an offense-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility in adding two points to his criminal history2

score based on his having been on probation at the time he committed th e inst ant offense, and in

providing no basis for its calculation of the monetary loss caused by his offense.

The government argues that, through his plea agreement, Ter-Vartanyan wai ved any challenge

to his sentence. Although a defendant may, as part of his plea agreement, waive his statutory right

to appeal his sentence, see United States v. Melancon

, 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992), the

defendant’s waiver must be d et ermined to be informed and voluntary based on the record of the

defendant’s plea colloquy. U nited States v. Portillo

, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 115

S. Ct. 244 (1994). The government’s failure to submit into the record on appeal a copy of TerVartanyan’s plea colloquy, however, prevents this court from reviewing the government’s claim.

We have reviewed Ter-Vartanyan’s arguments and the record and find that the district court

did not clearly err in denying an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. U nited States v. Watkins

,

911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). The court’s finding that Ter-Vartanyan was on probation at the

time he co mmit t ed his offense was supported by evidence bearing sufficient indicia of reliability.

United States v. Mathei

, 913 F.2d 1130, 1138 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Fike

, 82 F.3d 1315,

1326 (5th Cir. 1996). Ter-Vartanyan did not raise his contention regarding loss-calculation before

the district court and has not shown plain error. U nited States v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th

Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

AFFIRMED.
February 27, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHARLES FREEMAN JR, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00939-CV V.

KENT DICKERSON, ROBERT H. KANE, JR., RONALD H. SHAMBLIN, 

D.D.S., AND JOHNNY MASON, D.D.S., Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on September 9, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Charles Freeman Jr.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




September 2023


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: February 06, 2024
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accountants' Acknowledgment


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:      Registration Statements Numbers 333-26819, 333-26827, 333-55803 and
         333-71903 on Form S-8

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 20, 1999 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




KPMG LLP



New York, New York
November 15, 1999
1

The HONORABLE ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Chief Judge, United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri.

2

The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2514

___________

All Denominational New Church, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Jackson County, Missouri, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: December 6, 2001

 Filed: December 11, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After the All Denominational New Church (the Church) filed a petition for

bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court1

 granted creditor Jackson County’s motion for relief

from the automatic bankruptcy stay. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1). Upon appeal, the

district court2

 affirmed and denied the Church’s motion for reconsideration. We
-2-

dismiss the Church’s appeal to this court as moot because the property the Church

seeks to protect has been sold to third parties, and there is therefore no effective relief

we could grant. See Van Iperen v. Prod. Credit Ass’n, 819 F.2d 189, 191 (8th Cir.

1987) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.