alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Philip Giroux

v. Civil No. 06-cv-250-PB

Town of Danbury, et al

O R D E R

The case shall be removed from the trial list and the pretrial conference is cancelled. the

court will issue further orders, if necessary, after ruling on the pending motions.

SO ORDERED.

December 19, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Philip Giroux, pro se

Daniel J. Mullen, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00250-PB Document 59 Filed 12/19/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-214144) and Amendment No. 698 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
      individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-223-PB

Benjamin Guernsey

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the February 6, 2007

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

prepare a proper defense. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, to allow the parties additional time to

properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial

from February 6, 2007 to May 1, 2007. In agreeing to continue

the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00223-PB Document 9 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The January 17, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 19, 2007 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 18, 2007

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00223-PB Document 9 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2008


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51078

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONEL JAIMES-MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-01-CR-143-ALL-JN

--------------------

April 3, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonel Jaimes-Maldonado appeals his sentence after pleading

guilty to possession of a firearm by an illegal alien. 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g)(5). Jaimes challenges his base offense level of 20

under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A)(2000). Jaimes contends that he

did not have a prior violent felony conviction that was

punishable by a term of imprisonment in excess of one year as

required by U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) and as defined in U.S.S.G.

§ 4B1.2, comment. (n.1). 
No. 01-51078 

-2-

“‘Prior felony conviction’ means a prior adult federal or

state conviction for an offense punishable by death or

imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether

such offense is specifically designated as a felony and

regardless of the actual sentence imposed.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2,

comment. (n.3) (emphasis added). Although Jaimes was sentenced

pursuant to TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.44 as if he had been

convicted of a Class A misdemeanor, Jaimes’s prior conviction for

attempted assault on a peace officer, punishable by imprisonment

for a maximum term of two years, qualified as a prior felony

conviction of a crime of violence. See U.S.S.G. 

§ 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). The district court thus properly assessed

Jaimes’s base offense level as 20.

Jaimes’s motion to supplement the record on appeal is

DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
#### James G. PACE, Appellant, v. Regina MORRIS and Henry Morris, her husband, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.

Sept. 28, 1956.

Arthur L. Willner, Miami, for appellant.

Schwarz & Zinn, Miami, and Bart L. Cohen, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

. The record and briefs in this cause have been examined and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of Coral Gates Properties, Inc., v. Hodes, Fla., 59 So.2d 630.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting'C. J., HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., and MORROW, Associate Justice, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger 
and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as a 
commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Saybolt LP, 2321 Burnett Blvd., Wilmington, NC 28401, has 
been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum 
products and organic chemicals for customs purposes, in accordance with 
the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to 
employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services 
should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it 
is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2919082dc9e93909a83b2969a81dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e2e3f1afede0e3e9f0c1e5e9f2afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed 
below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited 
laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial 
gauger and laboratory became effective on June 04, 2008. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-
1060.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-22216 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,721C] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on July 21, 2008 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Hutchinson FTS, Inc., Byrdstown, Tennessee. 

                    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification (TA-W-60,013) which expires on September 26, 2008. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve                           ( print page 53049)                        no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of September 2008. 

 Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-21323 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. Mildred Winifred GILKES.

No. 8638.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1938.

■ Frank E. Thompson, of Honolulu, T. H., and John H. Black and James M. Wallace, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

E. J. Botts and Fred Patterson, both of Honolulu, T. H., and Herbert Chamberlin, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court herein issue forthwith,
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1282-001]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Filing

September 16, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 11, 2008, Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company filed an errata to its July 21, 2008, Annual Adjustment to 
Interruptible Transmission Service Rate for Sacramento Municipal 
Utility District.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c2a293e2f2302000502093f191c1c031e182c0a091e0f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87c1c2d5c4c8e9ebeee9e2d4f2f7f7e8f5f3c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 23, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22158 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 12, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 12, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0137. THE KROGER CO. v. TORI AMY MOSS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

82571
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael DeAngelis

v. Civil No. 06-cv-376-PB

New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Michael DeAngelis has filed a one-paragraph complaint,

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the New Hampshire State

Prison (“NHSP”) (document no. 1). Construed liberally, the 

complaint alleges that the NHSP abridged his federally protected

rights by failing to protect him from an attack that resulted in

physical and mental injuries. The complaint is before me for

preliminary review to determine whether, among other things, it

states a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915A; U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire

Local Rule (“LR”) 4.3(d)(2). For the reasons stated below, I

order plaintiff to amend his complaint.

Construing the complaint liberally, see Haines v. Kerner,

404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), I do not understand the precise causes

of action that plaintiff intends to plead. While the complaint

appears to allege Section 1983 claims predicated upon the NHSP’s

failure to protect plaintiff from an attack, the complaint does

Case 1:06-cv-00376-JL Document 6 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 3
2

not allege sufficient facts from which a violation of the

constitution or other federal law can be clearly discerned. 

Accordingly, I will not conduct a preliminary review of this case

until plaintiff has amended his complaint to identify his claims

and relate them to particular defendants.

The amended complaint should, at a minimum: (1) invoke the

jurisdiction of this court (it appears that plaintiff is

proceeding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the amended complaint should

make this clear); (2) clearly list all persons and/or entities

plaintiff wishes to sue (the amended complaint should identify

the individual defendants responsible for the alleged harm); (3)

clearly state the reason each defendant is being sued by setting

forth what each defendant did to plaintiff and when he or she did

it (plaintiff should state who attacked him and what the NHSP

and/or individual NHSP officers did or failed to do; (4) list the

constitutional and/or federal statutory provisions each defendant

is accused of violating (if plaintiff claims that defendants have

violated his Eighth Amendment rights this should be stated in the

amended complaint; and (5) clearly state all relief (including

any injunctive relief) plaintiff is seeking.

The Clerk’s Office is directed to provide the plaintiff with

a copy of the Court’s pro se manual to assist him in preparing an

Case 1:06-cv-00376-JL Document 6 Filed 12/06/06 Page 2 of 3
3

amended complaint.

Plaintiff should file his amended complaint within twenty

(20) days. If he does not do so, I may recommend to the

presiding judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 6, 2006

cc: Michael DeAngelis, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00376-JL Document 6 Filed 12/06/06 Page 3 of 3
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2012


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: September 19, 2012
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
AMERUS LIFE HOLDINGS, INC.
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



Pro Forma Weighted Average Number of Shares* (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                              <C>
  Class A Common Stock owned by AmerUs Group           11,707
  Class A Common Stock owned by the public              6,449
  Class B Common Stock owned by AmerUs Group            5,000
                                                       ------
                                                       23,156
                                                       ======

  *    The issuance of Class A and Class B Common Stock is considered to have occurred as of January 1, 1996 for pro forma purposes;
       therefore, the weighted average number of shares outstanding is 23,156,000.  The Company has no dilution of shares.
</TABLE>
Primary Pro Forma Earnings Per Common Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           Six Months Ended    Three Months Ended
                                June 30,            June 30,
                           ------------------- ------------------
                              1997      1996        1997       1996
                              ----      ----        ----       ----
<S>                           <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>
Primary Pro Forma Earnings 
  Per Common Share            $1.25     $2.44       $0.62      $0.51
                              =====     =====       =====      =====
/TABLE
<PAGE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132291 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132291 

 COA: 262328 

Wayne CC: 04-012023-01

JOHNATHAN LARAWN ROUNDTREE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 29, 2006 

 Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Vaillancourt

v. Case No. 06-cv-472-PB

NH Department of Corrections

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated January 26, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

February 14, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Joseph Vaillancourt

Case 1:06-cv-00472-PB Document 25 Filed 02/14/07 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Cause number and style: 01–13-00489-CR; Diaz v. State

Date motion filed: November 6, 2013

Party filing motion: Salomon Angulo Diaz

It is ordered that the motion for panel rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: November 19, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven Swan

 v. Civil No. 07-fp-01

Paul Barbadoro, et al.

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from this case as I am a named

defendant.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 9, 2007

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

 

Case 1:07-cv-00001-GZS Document 3 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cr-00173-JD Document 11 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00173-JD Document 11 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00173-JD Document 11 Filed 08/22/06 Page 3 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00173-JD Document 11 Filed 08/22/06 Page 4 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00173-JD Document 11 Filed 08/22/06 Page 5 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00173-JD Document 11 Filed 08/22/06 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Linens 'n Things, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Norman
Axelrod, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William T. Giles, as
Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Norman Axelrod
------------------
Name:    Norman Axelrod
Title:   Chairman and Chief
         Executive Officer
Date:    April 19, 2005



/s/ William T. Giles
--------------------
Name:    William T. Giles
Title:   Executive Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer
Date:    April 19, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Weisman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 14, 2004

/S/David Weisman
------------------
David Weisman,
Chief Executive Officer