alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JULMAL LEWIS

PETITION OF: DANIEL SILVERMAN, ESQ.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 29 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8

th day of September, 2022, in consideration of the Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of 

Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Attorney Daniel Silverman should 

be permitted to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B)(1), Comment (precluding an attorney 

from ceasing representation of a criminal-defendant client absent leave of court). 

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is ORDERED to enter its order 

regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its determination.
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00393-CR

Asel ABDYGAPPAROVA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001CR4918A

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed in this appeal on July 2, 2014. Ms. 

Amy Hinds was previously granted an additional thirty days in which to file the record, 

extending the deadline to August 1, 2014. Because the record was not filed by the extended 

deadline, on August 6, 2014, this court ordered Ms. Hinds to file the record in this court no later 

than August 25, 2014. On August 7, 2014, Ms. Hinds filed a notification of late record 

requesting an extension to September 4, 2014. The extension is GRANTED. THIS IS THE 

FINAL EXENSION OF TIME THAT WILL BE GRANTED. If the record is not filed by 

September 4, 2014, an order may be issued directing Ms. Hinds to appear and show cause why 

she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall 

cause a copy of this order to be served on Ms. Hinds by certified mail, return receipt requested, 

or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report), we, Richard A. Post, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael F. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|/s/ RICHARD A. POST                                                                       
|Richard A. Post, Chief Executive Officer November 7, 2005                                 
|                                                                                          
|/s/ MICHAEL F. SCHMIDT                                                                    
|Michael F. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) November 7,
2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIB 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1448

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations 

issued by the Government of American Samoa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1448 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS 

2 AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOV3 ERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA. 

4 (a) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME TAX5 ATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—Sub6 section (b) of section 202 of Public Law 98-454 (48 

7 U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(b) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME

9 TAXATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The interest on any bond 

11 or other obligation issued by or on behalf of the 

12 Government of American Samoa shall be exempt 

13 from taxation by the Government of American 

14 Samoa and the governments of any of the several 

15 States, the District of Columbia, any territory or 

16 possession of the United States, and any subdivision 

17 thereof. 

18 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION APPLICABLE ONLY TO INCOME

19 TAXES.—The exemption provided by paragraph (1) 

20 shall not apply to gift, estate, inheritance, legacy, 

21 succession, or other wealth transfer taxes.’’. 
3

HR 1448 RFS 

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
42

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

1999: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2001: Q1... 38 43 20 21 67 13 45 4

 Q2... 35 47 18 22 69 9 50 4

 Q3... 28 59 13 16 75 9 38 5

 Q4... 49 39 12 29 64 7 57 3

2002: Q1... 8 32 60 16 63 21 10 3

 Q2... 58 41 2 19 68 12 49 4

 Q3... 58 33 9 34 60 6 55 4

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

1999: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

 Q2... 65 33 2 35 54 11 63 3

 Q3... 70 27 3 33 56 11 65 3

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         13,653
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,324,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,096,085
<INVENTORY>                                    3,371,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,929,813
<PP&E>                                         1,755,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                 408,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,005,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,349,698
<BONDS>                                        613,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    15
<COMMON>                                       1,160
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,153,846)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,005,106
<SALES>                                        4,999,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,420,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,894,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,894,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,894,502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.20)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO

CommercialMortgageServicing D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2018,
by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER
SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate Adminstrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C6 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from December 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGO Leslie Hayton Managing
Director Wells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


LOGO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Debbie I. Glaude

v. Civil No. 07-cv-138-SM

US Army, Department of Public Affairs

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 14, 2007

cc: Debbie I. Glaude, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00138-SM Document 3 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 1
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 31, 2004
#### Ralph M. SHEAF, Appellant, v. Lawrence Carl KLOSE, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of the Estate of Louisa Sheaf, deceased, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Nov. 2, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1954.

Patterson, Freeman, Richardson & Watson, Giles J. Patterson, Jacksonville, and *596Williamson, Gunster & Baugher, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Hal H. McCaghren, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

TERRELL, Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County affirming an order of the Probate Court holding that the home of Louisa Sheaf was her homestead and descended to her son, Carl Klose, by a former marriage, as her sole heir at law.

The property involved was purchased jointly by Mr. and Mrs. Sheaf in 1945. It was their home till Mr. Sheaf died in 1950. Mrs. Sheaf continued to live on the property as her home till her death in August 1951. No children were born to the Sheafs. Appellee never lived on the property as a member of the Sheaf family. March 2, 1951, he moved into his mother’s home and lived there about thirty days, during which time he was separated from his fourth wife. April 1st he went to Michigan with friends who took him at his mother’s request and at her expense. . Fpr all the record shows these contributions were gratuities and in no sense were they intended as support for a dependent. There is no showing whatever that when appellant moved in with his mother he did so with the intention of making it his home, that he indicated such an intent to his mother and that she accepted him as a dependent. When he returned to Florida after his mother’s death and applied for letters of administration, he did not give his mother’s home as his place of residence.

To be a homestead under the Constitution it must be shown that there was a fixed purpose on the part of the mother to so convert it and that appellee moved in with the intent of making it his home. Herrin v. Brown, 44 Fla. 782, 33 So. 522. There must be showing as to these material facts to create a homestead under the constitution. There was a complete failure of such showing in this case. We do not discuss In re Estate of Sheaf, Fla., 63 So.2d 255, except to say that if it does not rule this case the evidence before us fails completely to show that a homestead was created in favor of Mrs. Sheaf. Pasco v. Harley, 73 Fla. 819, 75 So. 30; Lanier v. Lanier, 95 Fla. 522, 116 So. 867; Drucker v. Rosenstein, 19 Fla. 191.

The judgment appealed from is accordingly reversed.

Reversed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-241-PB

Adan Raudales-Marcia

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

January 8, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and prepare a defense. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 8, 2008 to April 1, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00241-PB Document 9 Filed 12/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The December 21, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to March 28, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 20, 2007

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00241-PB Document 9 Filed 12/20/07 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1437-001]


Polytop Corporation; Notice of Filing

September 17, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 11, 2008, Polytop Corporation filed 
an amendment to its August 22, 2008 notice of cancellation filing.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c78182958488a9abaea9a294b2b7b7a8b5b387a1a2b5a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5838097868aaba9acaba096b0b5b5aab7b185a3a0b7a6eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 2, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22273 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1991...... 7.3 6.7 8.5 7.2 24.6 5.3 7.7 8.3 10.6 5.8 

1992...... 8.9 6.1 9.5 8.6 20.1 9.4 8.3 9.7 11.1 7.2 

1993...... 9.2 7.3 9.6 8.3 30.4 9.4 8.5 10.0 11.1 7.4 1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 

2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 

2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 1999: Q2... 14.4 8.8 12.0 14.2 13.9 18.8 9.9 11.3 14.7 15.7  Q3... 12.0 6.9 7.3 9.3 22.3 17.1 9.4 10.4 11.1 13.8 

 Q4... 11.5 7.7 10.9 8.7 24.1 16.9 9.7 11.1 12.9 11.1 

2000: Q1... 11.2 9.0 10.4 10.0 17.4 14.1 9.8 12.0 10.9 11.4  Q2... 11.6 9.7 9.3 10.1 22.3 13.4 10.8 11.9 11.7 11.6 

 Q3... 11.1 6.7 14.8 9.1 30.7 10.2 9.0 11.2 10.2 11.9 

 Q4... 10.6 7.2 9.7 7.9 25.8 14.5 8.9 10.5 11.5 10.5 

2001: Q1... 18.7 8.7 18.6 12.4 30.6 25.9 9.9 13.3 13.5 23.0 

 Q2... 11.8 8.1 16.9 10.2 14.0 12.8 11.1 11.9 12.5 11.6  Q3... 11.0 6.8 10.7 8.6 32.3 11.3 9.1 11.2 11.8 10.9  Q4... 10.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 31.4 9.9 7.6 11.1 12.1 10.3 2002: Q1... 11.7 9.3 9.7 10.9 29.8 10.8 10.0 12.4 14.6 10.3  Q2... 13.4 11.3 19.6 10.6 27.7 16.8 10.2 12.6 14.2 13.8  Q3... 9.9 6.3 8.0 9.8 12.7 10.6 9.4 9.4 10.6 9.7  Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(b)

                                    TXU CORP.

                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                         OF SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of TXU
Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
          Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of August, 2002.


                               /s/   Erle Nye
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Name:   Erle Nye
                             Title:  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive