alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 PETRAS ET AL., APPELLEES, V. OHIO CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL.;

2 TOWER CITY DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS. 

3 [Cite as Petras v. Ohio Concrete Constr. Co. (1995), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 

4 Torts -- Inherently dangerous work -- Establishing liability to injured employee of 

5 independent contractor -- General contractor “actively participated,” 

6 when. 

7 (No. 94-1830 -- Submitted December 6, 1995 -- Decided December 27, 

8 1995.) 

9 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 65600. 

10 ______________ 

11 Dennis Seaman & Associates and David A. Kulwicki, for appellees. 

12 Law Offices of Jan A. Saurman and Alan B. Glassman, for appellants Tower 

13 City Development, Inc. and Forest City Commercial Construction Company, Inc. 

14 McLaughlin, McNally & Carlin and Tom Vasari; Casper & Casper and

15 Michael R. Thomas, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial 

16 Lawyers. 

17 Calfee, Halter & Griswold and Wm. Tousley Smith, urging reversal for 

18 amicus curiae, Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America. 
 2

1 ______________ 

2 

3 The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Bond v. 

4 Howard Corp. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 332, 650 N.E.2d 416. Final judgment for 

5 appellants. 

6 MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and 

7 COOK,JJ., concur. 

8
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 37 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141759) and Amendment No. 503 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln
      Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N For Variable Annuities for the registration of
      interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S. Campney, Sr.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-297-JD

Superintendent, Bare Hill

Correctional Facility

O R D E R

On April 18, 2007, this Court ordered the petition for a

writ of habeas corpus, filed by petitioner Randy S. Campney

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, served upon the respondents as to

Grounds 3, 4(e), 5-9 and 11 (document nos. 1, 7-9). See Habeas

Rule 4. In light of the voluminous supporting documents filed by

Campney, service of document no. 9 shall include only those

documents electronically docketed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 27, 2007

cc: Randy S. Campney, Sr., pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00297-JD Document 13 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 1
900 Circle 75 Parkway










	


900 Circle 75 Parkway

	


Suite 1120

	


  Atlanta, GA 30339

	


770-933-7000

	


770-933-7010 Fax












SunLink Health Systems, Inc.



March 9, 2005







Mr. Harry R. Alvis



SunLink Health Systems, Inc.



900 Circle 75 Parkway



Suite 1120



Atlanta, GA 30339



In Re:  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 









Dear Harry:



We refer to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement among you, SunLink Health Systems, Inc. ("SunLink") and SunLink Healthcare, LLC (successor to SunLink Healthcare Corp.) as of the 1st day of February, 2002 (the "Amended and Restated Employment Agreement"). The purpose of this letter is to amend the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement to extend the term thereof by eighteen months. Accordingly, the date "December 31, 2004" in the first sentence of Section 2 of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the date "June 30, 2006" is hereby inserted in lieu thereof. All other terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged, in full force and effect.



If you agree to the foregoing amendment please sign this letter agreement in the space indicated below.






SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.



 



By: /s/ Robert M. Thornton, Jr.



Title: Chief Executive Officer







SUNLINK HEALTHCARE, LLC






By: /s/ Joseph T. Morris



Title: President






ACCEPTED AND AGREED 



This 9th of March, 2005






/s/ Harry R. AlvisL.S.



Harry R. Alvis
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2015

s1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2015

150695

In re APPLICATION OF MICHIGAN ELECTRIC

TRANSMISSION COMPANY FOR

TRANSMISSION LINE

_________________________________________

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF OSHTEMO,

Appellant,

v SC: 150695

COA: 317893

MPSC No.: 00-017041

MICHIGAN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION

COMPANY LLC,

Petitioner-Appellee,

and

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed whether the Electric Transmission Line 

Certification Act, 1995 PA 30, effective May 17, 1995, is consistent with the first 

sentence of Const 1963, art 7, § 29.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Warren E. Peterson

v. No. 06-fp-424

NH Supreme Court, Clerk, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $12.80 is due no later than

December 21, 2006. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-424-SM. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 30, 2006

cc: Warren E. Peterson, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:06-cv-00424-SM Document 4 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 1
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                        
                               Estimated volume              Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                            (millions of dollars)                             (percent)
                      __________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2     Q3     Q4     Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                        
1992......    |          44       7     11     16     10      .232      .038      .058     .079     .049
1993......    |          24       2      4      7     11      .121      .010      .018     .035     .054
1994......    |          10       1      1      3      6      .048      .003      .003     .013     .026
1995......    |          12       0      3      6      4      .055     -.001      .011     .027     .016
1996......    |           7       0      1      2      4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1      0      3     14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1      3      0      5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3      5      7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3      8     14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9      5     17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6      5     16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6      8     14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Resource Management Company

v. Civil No. 06-cv-366-JD

Frank Gregory

O R D E R

Counsel’s letter (Document no. 101) states that Defendant

Gregory has died. It is considered by the court as a statement

of the fact of death sufficient to be a suggestion of the death

upon the record.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 6, 2007

cc: Resource Management Co., pro se

Douglas N. Gould, Esq.

Michael D. Ramsdell, Esq.

Joshua E. Menard, Esq.

Mark E. Howard, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 102 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                                   Agreement*

Party A: Drug clinical Study base under Harbin University of Medical Sciences

Party B: Harbin Three-Happiness Bioengineering Co., Ltd.

Grade One new Chinese Medicine, namely Cease Enuresis Soft Gel ,developed and
produced by Party B, is granted new medicine certificate and preproduction
approval Documentation Number. However, in terms of new provision of State Drug
Administration, new medicine is required to do IV phase clinical test to find
out if there is bad reaction, after new medicine goes into market. Party B is a
famous clinical base with advanced equipments and professional talents in China.
Both parties agree the following items after friendly discussion.

Item 1. Rights and obligations

1.1  Both parties design clinical test plan together, Party A is responsible to
     do IV phase clinical test for Cease Enuresis Soft Gel, which are provided
     by Party B.

1.2  Party B is responsible to promulgate and investigate bed-wetting towards 3
     to 12 year-old children throughout Harbin City, it is expected to educate
     over thirty thousand children to increase patients receiving retreating.

Item 2. Fees

     500 patients together will be observed in this clinical test program. Party
B will supply scientific research cost to Party A at [Y]500 per patient. The
half of scientific research cost should be paid at the beginning of clinical
test, the rest part should be paid upon finishing clinical test report.

Item 3. Cooperation period: from June 20, 2003 to December 19, 2003

Item 4. Both parties agree to sign this agreement, each party keeps one copy of
executed agreement.

Chop of Drug clinical Study base under Harbin University of Medical Sciences

Chop of Harbin Three-Happiness Bioengineering Co., Ltd.
Date: June 20, 2003

*Translation from Chinese original
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Errol Garvey, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 578]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered July 21, 2003, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove the “remains unlawfully” element of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.00 [5]; § 140.30 [1]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution produced sufficient evidence from which a rational jury could infer that the defendant unlawfully remained in the victims’ house *(see People v Acosta,*273 AD2d 318 [2000]; *People v Burnett,*205 AD2d 792 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2018

No. 04-17-00618-CV

Dina P. CISNEROS-BONNETTE,

Appellant

v.

Emcel P. BONNETTE, Jr.,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-11830

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

By order dated November 29, 2017, Ms. Kayleen Rivera was ordered to file her portion 

of the reporter’s record in this appeal no later than December 29, 2017. On January 3, 2018, Ms. 

Rivera called to inform the court that she was ill and would file a notification of late record by 

January 8, 2018. On January 8, 2018, Ms. Rivera filed a notification of late record stating she 

had been extremely ill with the flu and requested an extension of time to file the record. The 

notification of late record is NOTED, and the requested extension is GRANTED. Ms. Rivera’s 

portion of the reporter’s record must be filed in this appeal no later than January 31, 2018.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 

________________________ No. 07 - 13 - 00257 - CR

________________________ MAXINE JULIE BALDERAZ , APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 181st District Court Randall County, Texas Tri a l Court No. 22 , 499 - B ; Honorable John Board , Presiding 

### August 21 , 2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Maxine Julie Balderaz , has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Appeal . As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is signed by Appellant and h er attorney. No decision of this Court having been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue f orthwith. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice Do not publish.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his/her knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
-----------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
April 12, 2006


/S/ MOMOKO A. BERAN
-----------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
April 12, 2006

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
Order entered March 11 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01574 - CV CALIFCO, LLC, Appellant

V. DONALDSON PROPERTIES LTD . , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 11972 - K



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s March 10, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by MARCH 27, 2015 . We caution appellant that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.40+
INTUIT INC.
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN COMPENSATION TERMS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2019


On October 31, 2018, Intuit’s Board of Directors approved the following compensation, effective January 1, 2019, for Brad Smith for the role of Executive Chairman:
 
Salary and Bonus. Mr. Smith will be paid an annual base salary of $750,000. Mr. Smith will also be eligible to receive a target annual bonus of 100% of his base salary, prorated for Intuit’s 2019 fiscal year as of the date of his change of role.
 
Equity Awards. Mr. Smith will be granted the number of restricted stock units determined by dividing $3,000,000 by the closing price of the Intuit’s common stock on the date of grant. The date of grant for these restricted stock units will be Intuit’s regularly scheduled monthly grant date occurring in February 2019. The restricted stock units will vest and become issuable to Mr. Smith over approximately four years, with one fourth of the restricted stock units vesting on December 31, 2019, and 6.25% of the shares vesting on each April 1, July 1, October 1, and December 31 thereafter, until the shares under this award are fully vested. The restricted stock units will be subject to the terms of the Intuit Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-50-PB

Gene Stram

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

April 3, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and prepare a defense. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 3, 2007 to June 5, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00050-PB Document 9 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The March 23, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

May 24, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 23, 2007

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00050-PB Document 9 Filed 03/23/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Josephine Amatucci

V .

Norman Bolduc and Pauline Maloney

No . 06-fp-22 5

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-225-JD .

SO ORDERED .

Date : June 19, 200 6

cc : Josephine Amatucci, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00225-JD Document 3 Filed 06/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Luis Catala

v. Civil No. 05-cv-106-JD

NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, et al .

ORDE R

On November 22, 2005, the Court issued an Order denying Defendant's Motion for

Judgment on the Pleadings. A copy of this Order was mailed to the defendant at the New

Hampshire State Prison in Concord, NH. His copy was returned to the court with a notation

that Mr. Catala had been released. A representative from the Clerk's Office called the Prison

to confirm that Mr. Catala was not longer there and found out that he was paroled on

November 2, 2005 .

Pursuant to Local Rule 83 .6(e) a pro se party is under a continuing duty to notify the

clerk's office of any change of address. In that Mr. Catala has not advised the court of a new

address, this case is dismissed without prejudice .

SO ORDERED.

December 22, 2005 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judg e

cc: Luis Catala, pro se

Mary Maloney, Esq .

Case 1:05-cv-00106-JD Document 14 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Calvin Frett, Appellant, v Warden of Rikers Island Correctional Facility et al., Respondents.

[807 NYS2d 295]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Caesar Cirigliano, J.), entered January 24, 2005, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the petition, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The appeal claiming procedural errors regarding a preliminary parole revocation hearing was rendered moot by the final hearing determination *(People ex rel. Benton v Farsi,*1 AD3d 126 [2003]). Were we to consider petitioner’s claims, we would *473find them waived *(see Matter of White v New York State Div. of Parole,*60 NY2d 920, 922 [1983]; *cf. People ex rel. Melendez v Warden of Rikers Is. Correctional Facility,*214 AD2d 301, 302 [1995]), in any event, without merit *(see People ex rel. Lee v La Paglia,*249 AD2d 601, 602 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 807 [1998]), and, as regards his claim that he is entitled to parole time credit, not ripe for review *(see e.g. Matter of Cold Spring Harbor Area Civic Assn. v Suffolk County Dept. of Health Servs.,*305 AD2d 499, 500-501 [2003]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.