alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1456 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1456

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To expand the boundary of the Booker T. Washington National Monument, 
                        and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1456

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To expand the boundary of the Booker T. Washington National Monument, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Booker T. Washington National 
Monument Boundary Adjustment Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF BOOKER T. WASHINGTON NATIONAL MONUMENT EXPANDED.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of the 
Booker T. Washington National Monument'', approved April 2, 1956 (16 
U.S.C. 450ll et seq.), is amended by adding at the end the following 
new section:

``SEC. 5. ADDITIONAL LANDS.

    ``(a) Lands Added to Monument.--The boundary of the Booker T. 
Washington National Monument is modified to include the approximately 
15 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ``Boundary Map, 
Booker T. Washington National Monument, Franklin County, Virginia'', 
numbered BOWA 404/80,024, and dated February 2001. The map shall be on 
file and available for inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
    ``(b) Acquisition of Additional Lands.--The Secretary of the 
Interior is authorized to acquire from willing owners the land or 
interests in land described in subsection (a) by donation, purchase 
with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange.
    ``(c) Administration of Additional Lands.--Lands added to the 
Booker T. Washington National Monument by subsection (a) shall be 
administered by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the monument 
in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Lester Caron

Criminal No. 06-cr-194-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

11) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: April 16, 2007

cc: Peter Papps, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00194-JD Document 12 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covance Inc. ("Covance") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher A. Kuebler, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date:
May 4, 2004

/s/CHRISTOPHER A. KUEBLERChristopher A. Kuebler
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
3.12 U.S. RESERVE ASSETS

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2002 2003 2004

2005

Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.p

1 Total ................................. 79,006 85,938 86,824 79,526 77,742 76,594 74,620 72,243 71,273 70,218 68,773

2 Gold stock1 ............................ 11,043 11,043 11,045 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,041

3 Special drawing rights2,3 ................. 12,166 12,638 13,582 11,610 11,385 11,243 11,206 8,304 8,245 8,224 8,180

4 Reserve position in International Monetary Fund2 ............................ 21,979 22,535 19,479 15,422 15,406 15,274 13,438 13,336 13,245 12,720 12,097

5 Foreign currencies4 ..................... 33,818 39,722 42,718 41,452 39,910 39,036 38,935 39,563 38,742 38,234 37,445

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF have also been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2002 2003 2004

2005

Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.p

1 Deposits .............................. 136 162 80 126 105 103 83 81 96 88 82

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 678,106 845,080 1,041,215 1,057,109 1,065,032 1,058,972 1,070,625 1,075,098 1,056,594 1,060,857 1,073,710

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 9,045 8,971 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

_____________ No. 23-50686
consolidated with No. 23-50689 Summary Calendar

_____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus Felipe Matias-Miguel, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC Nos. 4:23-CR-178-1, 4:22-CR-229-1

______________________________ Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Felipe Matias-Miguel appeals following his conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) as well as the revocation of a previously imposed term of supervised release, arguing for the first time on

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 12, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50686 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/202423-50686 c/w No. 23-50689

2 appeal that the statutory sentencing enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. He concedes this argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition. Because the argument is foreclosed, see United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019), summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp. Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED , and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED

. Case: 23-50686 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, September 
17, 2008, at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matter will attend the Closed Meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(8) and (9), permit 
consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes as duty officer, voted to consider the item 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
September 17, 2008, will be: Matters related to the financial markets.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22133 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




September 2003


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TREMAIN MONROE, 

Defendant.

8:23CR117

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Deadline 

for Filing Pretrial Motions [34]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. 

Defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by 

August 7, 2023. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Deadline for Filing Pretrial Motions 

[34] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before August 7, 2023.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the 

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of 

the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between June 7, 2023, and August 7, 2023, shall be deemed 

excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the 

reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into 

consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to 

grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Dated this 8th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Susan M. Bazis

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00117-BCB-SMB Doc # 35 Filed: 06/08/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 71
Exhibit 10.3


 


2nd AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT is dated May 30th, 2019.


 


Between:


 


IDEANOMICS, INC., formerly Seven Stars Cloud Group, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (“Ideanomics” or “SSC”)


 


And:


 


FOMALHAUT LIMITED, a company organized under the laws
of the British Virgin Islands (“SSS”)


 


Background


 


		1.	Ideanomics and SSS (the “Parties”) entered into a Stock Purchase Option Agreement (the “Contract”)
dated August 31st, 2018, for the following purpose:



		·	To grant SSS the option to sell Grapevine Logic, Inc. (“GLI”) shares, or the right to purchase the GLI shares,
to Ideanomics.



 


		2.	The Parties desire to amend the Contract on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amending Agreement (the “Agreement”).



 


		3.	This Agreement is the second amendment to the Contract.



 


 


IN CONSIDERATION OF the Parties agreeing to amend their obligations
in the existing Contract, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties
agree to keep, perform, and fulfill the promises, conditions, and agreements below:


 


Amendments


 


The Contract is amended as follows:


 


		1.	The following is hereby deleted from the Contract:



 


Section 2(a) The aggregate exercise price for the Option
is the fair market value of the Company Shares as of the close of business on the date preceding the date upon which the Option
is exercised (the “Exercise Price”).


 


		2.	The following from the original Contract is hereby changed and shall hereafter be and read as follows:



 


Section 2(a) The aggregate exercise price for the Option
is the greater of (i) fair market value of the Company Shares as of the close of business on the date preceding the date upon which
the Option is exercised; and (ii) $1.84 per share (the “Exercise Price”).


 






     


     


    

 


In the instance of conflict between the terms of the Agreement
and the Contract, the terms of the Agreement shall prevail.


 


No Other Change


 


Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, all
of the terms and conditions of the Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


Miscellaneous Terms


 


Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement will
have the meanings ascribed to them in the Contract. Headings are inserted for the convenience of the parties only and are not to
be considered when interpreting this Agreement. Words in the singular mean and include the plural and vice versa. Words in the
masculine include the feminine and vice versa. No regard for gender is intended by the language of this Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have duly affixed their signatures
under hand on this May 30th, 2019.


 


 


	For Ideanomics, Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Alfred
    P. Poor	 
	By: Alfred P. Poor	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	For Fomalhaut Limited.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Bruno
    Wu	 
	By:	 
	Title:
#### Gail W. GODWIN; Skye Godwin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF VIRGINIA CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION; Stephen Cannella, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-2112.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 24, 2003.

Decided March 13, 2003.

Gail W. Godwin, Skye Godwin, Appellants Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; William DeLaney Bayliss, James Scott Kulp, Williams, Mullen, Clark *&*Dobbins, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Gail Godwin and Skye Godwin appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.**See Godwin v. Virginia Child Support Enforcement Division,*No. CA-0-421 (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 To the extent that Gail Godwin has standing based on her claims of humiliation, embarrassment, and mental and emotional stress, her claims fail for the same reasons as Skye's, as set forth in the district court's opinion. Further, as to Plaintiffs' claim on appeal that Defendant Canella should be considered a state actor because he conspired with state actors, their claim is unsupported and thus must fail. *See Phillips v. Mashburn,*746 F.2d 782, 785 (11th Cir. 1984).
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1537

For the relief of Perla Franccesca Segovia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Perla Franccesca Segovia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR PERLA

4 FRANCCESCA SEGOVIA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Perla Franccesca Segovia shall be eligible for

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment

12 of status to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 1537 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Perla Franccesca

2 Segovia enters the United States before the filing deadline

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of

7 the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Perla Franccesca Segovia, the Secretary of State

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

23 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 19 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Providing for the appointment of Walter E. Massey as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Walter E. Massey as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Frank A. Shrontz of Washington 
on May 4, 2000, is filled by the appointment of Walter E. Massey of 
Georgia. The appointment is for a term of 6 years and shall take effect 
on the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WOBBER BROS., a Corporation.

No. 8785.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 7, 1938.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Justice, and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Leon deFremery; of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of petitioner, consented to by counsel for petitioner, ordered petition to review herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gregorio Guardarramos-Cepeda

v. 05-cv-62-PB

NH State Prison, Warden

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 2, 2009, no objection having been filed. Additionally,

finding that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2); Rule 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under

Section 2254; First Cir. LR 22.0.

SO ORDERED.

December 24 , 2009 _/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Gregorio Guardarramos-Cepeda, Pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00062-PB Document 16 Filed 12/24/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

National Fire & 

Marine Insurance Co.

v. Civil No. 07-cv-9-JM

ECH Builders, LLC and

Sparkling River, LLC

O R D E R

Based upon the telephonic arguments of counsel this date

concerning the settlement of this case, the court orders:

1. The mortgage, note and guaranty are to be 

executed immediately and provided to defense counsel,

who shall place the executed documents in escrow until

the matter is settled and the action is dismissed;

2. Mr. Elliott, as the principal member of defendants

ECH Builders, LLC, Sparkling River, LLC and Wellsley,

LLC, shall provide plaintiff’s counsel copies of the

companies’ 2007 tax returns and all 2007 annual filings

with the Secretary of State. Mr. Elliott shall also

provide plaintiff’s counsel with a list of any and all 

business records that have been maintained for each of

the three companies during 2008. All these documents must 

be provided to plaintiff’s counsel by December 30, 2008.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 9, 2008

Case 1:07-cv-00009-JM Document 56 Filed 12/09/08 Page 1 of 2
2

cc: Lucy J. Karl, Esq.

Joann Sternheimer, Esq.

William Aivalikles, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00009-JM Document 56 Filed 12/09/08 Page 2 of 2