alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7550

DARRICK LAMONTE KING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-617-5-BO)

Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 30, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrick Lamonte King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*By order filed February 3, 2004, this appeal was placed in

abeyance for Jones v. Braxton, No. 03-6891. In view of our recent

decision in Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 2004), we no

longer find it necessary to hold this case in abeyance for Jones.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Darrick Lamonte King, a North Carolina prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) as successive.* An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that King has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. To the extent King’s notice of appeal and informal brief

could be construed as a motion for authorization to file a

successive § 2254 petition, we deny such authorization. See United
- 3 -

States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,

124 S. Ct. 496 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1183

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 113 South Main Street in Sylvania, Georgia,

as the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1183 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 113 South Main Street in Sylvania, Georgia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan Post

5 Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-53-01-SM

Timothy McComas-Lowe

O R D E R

Defendant McComas-Lowe’s motion to continue the final pretrial

conference and trial is granted (document 16). Trial has been rescheduled for

the September 2007 trial period. Defendant McComas-Lowe shall file a

waiver of speedy trial rights not later than May 30, 2007. On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00053-SM Document 17 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 21, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00053-SM Document 17 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-105-01-JD

Vincent Chaney

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

17) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Joseph A. DiClerico,Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: December 7, 2007

cc: Jessica C. Brown, Esq.

William E. Morse, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00105-PB Document 19 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Advance  Financial  Bancorp  (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Stephen M.  Gagliardi,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Stephen M.
Magnone,  Treasurer (Chief Financial  Officer),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,   as  adopted   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stephen M. Gagliardi                     /s/ Stephen M. Magnone
-------------------------------------        -----------------------------------
Stephen M. Gagliardi                         Stephen M. Magnone
President and Chief Executive Officer        Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)



November 12, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-226-PB

Robert Hatch, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the June 5, 2007 trial

in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete extensive discovery and prepare for trial or other

disposition. The government and co-defendants do not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to October 10, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00226-PB Document 49 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 22, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to

September 24, 2007 at 4:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 4, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Mark Irish, Esq.

Dana Cole, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq.

David Bownes, Esq.

Richard Johnston, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00226-PB Document 49 Filed 05/04/07 Page 2 of 2
2 U.S. Treasury securities

................. 594,094 592,630 678,106 727,142 747,089 743,308 754,469 772,222 788,734 810,572845,080 

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 9,451 9,099 9,045 9,031 9,004 9,004 8,977 8,971 8,971 8,971 8,971 

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional 3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not organizations. included in the gold stock of the United States. 

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PIYUSH G. PATEL, DAVID J. KIRKPATRICK, 

ERIC JAEGER, BRUCE D. KAY, ROBERT J. 

GAGALIS, ROBERT G. BARBER, JR., 

LAWRENCE COLLINS, MICHAEL A. 

SKUBITZ, JERRY A. SHANAHAN, HOR 

CHONG (DAVID) BOEY, 

 Defendants 

 No. 01:07-00039-SM 

SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES LUX

I, James Lux, being duly sworn, hereby state that the following is true: 

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr 

LLP, located at 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109. The Firm’s telephone number is 

(617) 526-6000. 

2. I have been admitted to practice before the following courts in the years 

indicated: 

Court Year of Admission 

Commonwealth of Massachusetts 2007 

 U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts 2008 

 U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit 2008 

U.S. District Court, District of Colorado 2008 

Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 269 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

3. I am an attorney in good standing and eligible to practice in the abovereferenced courts. I have not been suspended or disbarred in any jurisdiction, and no 

disciplinary actions are pending against me. 

4. I have not been denied pro hac vice status or had pro hac vice status 

revoked in any court. I have never been criminally convicted of any felony or 

misdemeanor. 

Signed under the penalties of perjury this 5th day of December, 2011 

/s/ James Lux 

James Lux 

Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 269 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, Jonathan A. Shapiro, hereby certify that the Supplemental Affidavit of James 

Lux in support of Defendant Eric Jaeger’s Unopposed Motion to Admit James Lux pro 

hac vice filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered 

participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing and paper copies will be sent 

to those indicated as non-registered participants on December 5, 2011. 

/s/ Jonathan A. Shapiro 

 Jonathan A. Shapiro 

Dated: December 5, 2011 

Case 1:07-cv-00039-SM Document 269 Filed 12/05/11 Page 3 of 3
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1355

To merge the deposit insurance funds at the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mr. LAFALCE (for himself and Ms. WATERS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To merge the deposit insurance funds at the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deposit Insurance

5 Funds Merger Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FRIST AMENDMENT.

7 Subsection (c) of section 2704 of the Deposit Insur8 ance Funds Act of 1996 (12 U.S.C. 1821 nt.) is amended

9 by striking ‘‘, if no insured depository institution is a sav10 ings association on that date’’.
2

•HR 1355 IH

1 SEC. 3. MERGING THE BIF AND SAIF.

2 Subsection (c) of section 2704 of the Deposit Insur3 ance Funds Act of 1996 (12 U.S.C. 1821 nt.) (as amend4 ed by section 2) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1,

5 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2002.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


         Acknowledgment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
         ---------------------------------------------------------------


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:     Registration Statements Numbers 333-116719, 333-116720, 333-71903,
        333-42874, 333-55803, 333-62982 and 333-62984 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 29, 2004 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm or a report prepared or certified
by an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm within the meaning of
sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.





/S/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
August 6, 2004



                                       21
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1583 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, as the ``Lee H. 
       Hamilton Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, as the ``Lee H. 
       Hamilton Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 121 
West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

TROY R. FINLEY,

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MICHEAL MYERS,

Respondent.

8:23CV224

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Filing No. 1, and a Motion 

for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Filing No. 2. Habeas corpus cases attacking 

the legality of a person’s confinement require the payment of a $5.00 filing fee. 28 

U.S.C. § 1914(a). However, after considering Petitioner’s financial status as shown in 

the records of this Court (see inmate trust account statement at Filing No. 5), leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis will be granted and Petitioner is relieved from paying the 

filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in 

Forma Pauperis, Filing No. 2, is granted. The next step in this case is for the Court to 

conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of 

the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Court will conduct this review in its 

normal course of business. 

8:23-cv-00224-JFB-PRSE Doc # 6 Filed: 06/09/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 19
2

Dated this 9th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00224-JFB-PRSE Doc # 6 Filed: 06/09/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 20
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0344

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.R.

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant K.R.’s motion for extension of 

time, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant K.R. is granted an 

extension of time to and including December 30, 2022, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

No further extensions of time will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 21 2022

11/21/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0344
****
 **Exhibit
32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being,
Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
April 19, 2005
 
 
 
 /s/ Bruce
Korman     /s/
Edmund King_____
 Chief
Executive Officer   Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Cash Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Cash Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Josephine Amatucci

v. Civil No. 05-cv-259-SM

Charles Hamilton, et al.

O R D E R

 Defendants move to quash plaintiff’s subpoena duces tecum

and plaintiff moves to compel production of documents sought by

the subpoena. 

Discussion

The subpoena is defective on its face. It is not directed

“TO” anyone. It does not call for production at any time or

place. It is not signed by the “issuing party.” No proof of

service appears. Just as fatally, other than some conclusory

statements, plaintiff has not demonstrated how any or all of

defendants’ personnel files are relevant. It is clear that the

individual defendants do not have the logs, personnel records or

internal affairs files. 

The court recognizes that plaintiff is pro se but it cannot

act as her advisor or lawyer. 

The motion to quash (document no. 36) is granted. The

Case 1:05-cv-00259-SM Document 41 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
2

motion to compel (document no. 37) is denied. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 13, 2006

cc: R. Matthew Cairns, Esq.

 Lisa Lee, Esq.

 Josephine Amatucci, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00259-SM Document 41 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2
United States District Court 

for the District of New Hampshire 

Dynamic Network Services, Inc., 

 Plaintiff 

vs. No. 06-cv-37-JM

Timothy J. Wilde, 

 Defendant 

Assented Motion to Establish Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Plead

Now comes Timothy J. Wilde, Defendant in the above-entitled matter, and by and 

through his attorneys, Pierce Atwood LLP, states as follows: 

1. Counsel for the Defendant has appeared and, in consultation with the Plaintiff’s 

counsel, requests that the Court, subject to the exercise of its discretion, establish April 24, 2006 

as the date, on or before which the Defendant may answer or otherwise plead. 

2. Counsel for the Plaintiff concurs in the relief requested. 

3. In light of the subject matter of this motion, no memorandum of law is deemed 

necessary. 

{P0111477.1}

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
{P0111477.1}

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 Timothy J. Wilde 

 By his attorneys, 

Pierce Atwood LLP 

Date: April 3, 2006 By: /s/ Lawrence M. Edelman

 Lawrence M. Edelman 

 N.H. Bar No. 738 

 Pease International Tradeport 

 One New Hampshire Avenue 

 Suite 350 

 Portsmouth, NH 03801 

 (603) 433-6300 

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Assented Motion to Establish Deadline to 

Answer or Otherwise Plead was served on the following on this 3rd day of April, 2006 and in the 

manner specified herein: 

Electronically Served Through ECF: 

 Christopher Cole, Esquire 

 Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green 

 1000 Elm Street 

 P.O. Box 3701 

 Manchester, NH 03105 

 E-mail: ccole@sheehan.com 

 /s/ Lawrence M. Edelman

 Lawrence M. Edelman 

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 9 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,676,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,676,023
<PP&E>                                          16,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,692,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,642,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,692,293
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,218
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,432)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,432)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (19.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (19.24)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-00308-SM Document 68 Filed 05/13/08 Page 1 of 1