alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, November 3-7, 2003Percent except as noted

Loan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rat

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,157,387 57,795 155,039 377,298 294,749 59,900 43,77

Number of loans 32,144 2,878 4,906 11,227 6,539 1,369 1,39

Weighted average maturity (months)1 19.38 12.97 30.78 20.95 13.05 23.59 18.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.59 8.13 5.12 5.05 1.89 .85 9.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.15 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 5.04 6.16 5.91 4.94 4.32 5.17 4.

 Standard error5 .15 .30 .16 .23 .14 .14 .7

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 6.18 7.14 6.52 6.43 5.06 6.17 6.

 25th percentile 3.82 5.11 5.51 3.55 3.30 3.82 2.4

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.69 6.39 6.22 4.13 3.45 5.01 6.2

 Other livestock 5.44 5.78 5.68 5.67 3.93 4.20 6.0

 Other current operating expenses7 5.19 5.91 5.79 5.33 4.84 5.01 5.2

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.85 7.16 6.55 5.54 4.63 7.13 6.

 Farm real estate 6.00 5.96 6.15 5.89 5.61 6.43 6.2

 Other8 4.31 3.96 4.84 4.09 4.16 5.75 3.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 75.30 37.30 61.64 83.65 96.24 98.22 57.

 Under commitment 77.52 49.29 71.01 80.40 95.13 95.14 81.

 Callable 20.46 16.46 24.73 17.85 11.43 8.40 7.

 Subject to prepayment penalty 2.79 .60 10.18 2.24 2.26 .68 .5

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 18.31 34.78 20.15 18.71 20.89 3.01 2.

 Other livestock 10.05 8.06 19.54 7.38 10.18 8.26 3.2

 Other current operating expenses7 41.35 39.27 35.90 46.22 38.05 65.43 23.

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.88 8.60 6.91 6.36 5.66 .18 8.0

 Farm real estate 5.31 8.39 13.17 3.73 3.46 8.56 6.

 Other8 19.09 .91 4.34 17.61 21.76 14.56 55.9

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 8.65 9.77 16.54 7.70 3.62 14.61 11.2

 Other 86.28 87.20 80.04 83.96 95.07 83.89 58.

 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
Exhibit 32(a)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, John F. Young,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 28th day
of April, 2011.



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNGName:

John F. YoungTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Energy Future Holdings Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biophysics of Neural Systems Study Section, October 2, 2008, 8 am to October 3, 2008, 5 pm, One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington Circle, Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 9, 2008, 73 FR 52395-52397.                 

The meeting will be held one day only October 2, 2008, from 8 am to 8 pm. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: September 15, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-22055 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1588 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1588

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for 
 the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2001

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii (for herself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for 
 the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS ON DISTRIBUTIONS BY 
              COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 216(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to distributions by cooperative housing corporations) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Distributions by Cooperative Housing Corporations.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in regulations--
                    ``(A) no gain or loss shall be recognized to a 
                cooperative housing corporation on the distribution by 
                such corporation of a dwelling unit to a stockholder in 
                such corporation if such distribution is in exchange 
                for the stockholder's stock in such corporation, and
                    ``(B) no gain or loss shall be recognized to a 
                stockholder of such corporation on the transfer of such 
                stockholder's stock in an exchange described in 
                subparagraph (A).
            ``(2) Basis.--The basis of a dwelling unit acquired in a 
        distribution to which paragraph (1) applies shall be the same 
        as the basis of the stock in the cooperative housing 
        corporation for which it is exchanged, decreased in the amount 
        of any money received by the taxpayer in such exchange.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to distributions after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7557

ANTHONY BERNARD PAGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPTAIN HOLLOWAY, Shift Commander; JACK LEE,

Assistant Warden; D. TAYLOR, Chairman, ICC;

D. SWISHER, Hearings Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE

PERSONNEL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-529-R)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: July 31, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Anthony Bernard Page, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Page

v. Holloway, No. CA-95-529-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S . Campney, Sr.

v . Civil No. 06-cv-297-JD

Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Superintendent

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated October 21, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

November 10, 200 8

cc: Stephen Fuller, Esq.

Randy S . Campney, Sr., pro se

Susan McGinnis, Esq .

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico. Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00297-JD Document 71 Filed 11/10/08 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 12, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 12, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0091. ARK TEMPORARY STAFFING, INC. v. MADISON INSURANCE GROUP, INC. et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 16A07246
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Alfredo Castellanos Bayouth, et al.

v. NH Civil No. 05-ds-21-JD

PR Civil No. 02-2357

Gabriela Alejandra Guzman Pinal

and Luis Olmos Dueas

PROCEDURAL ORDER

Alfredo Castellanos has filed a response as directed by the

court’s order issued on August 17, 2005. Castellanos confirms

that Alfredo Castellanos Bayouth and Alfredo Castellanos are the

same person. He also confirms that he is the debtor in the

bankruptcy case, In re Alfredo Antonio Castellanos Bayouth, 04-

22496-SEK7, filed Nov. 8, 2004. The bankruptcy court has been

notified of that clarification through a motion to file an

amended certificate, filed by the bankruptcy trustee, John Zerbe,

on September 6, 2005.

Castellanos titled his filing in this court: “Response in

Compliance with Court Order and Seeking Other Remedies.” Because

Castellanos is the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, he lacks

standing to proceed in this action. Because Castellanos no

longer has standing in this case, the other remaining plaintiff,

the Conjugal Partnership Castellano-Hambleton, also lacks

standing to proceed.

Case 1:05-ds-00021-JD Document 22 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 2
2

John Zerbe, as the trustee in Casetellanos’s bankruptcy

proceeding, not Castellanos, is the proper party here unless and

until Zerbe files a notice that he is abandoning this suit as

property of the bankruptcy estate. To date, the trustee has not

filed notice of abandonment or a motion to substitute himself for

Castellanos in this case. The deadline for such a filing is

September 9, 2005. To the extent Castellanos or Zerbe intended

to request any relief in the context of the Response, that

request was not properly presented in a motion by a party in this

action and will not be considered by the court. 

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

 (Sitting by designation.)

September 7, 2005

cc: Alfredo Castellanos-Bayouth, Esquire

Angel E. Rotger-Sabat, Esquire

USDC-PR, Clerk

Case 1:05-ds-00021-JD Document 22 Filed 09/07/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1495 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1495

  To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a 
report about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by 
    public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay 
                               inequity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a 
report about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by 
    public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay 
                               inequity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Pay Improvement Report Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. REPORT BY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

    Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, using information supplied 
by the Department of Labor, the Office of Management and Budget, and 
the General Accounting Office, shall submit a report to the Congress 
making findings and recommendations relating to how the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) has been used by public 
and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay inequities, 
especially such inequities based on an employee's gender, race, color, 
religion, or national origin, or such other factor as the Commission 
finds relevant.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT





I,
Bruce C. Edwards, President and Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:

October 31, 2002



By:

/s/    BRUCE C. EDWARDSBruce C. Edwards President and
Chief Executive Officer Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christina Margaret Porter, et al.

v. Case No. 07-cv-28-PB

 

Dartmouth College, et al.

O R D E R

Defendants have not presented a persuasive argument to bar 

plaintiffs’ expert from testifying. Defendants’ objections to

the expert’s qualifications may affect the weight that the jury

will give to the expert’s testimony but they do not warrant a

ruling excluding the witness from testifying. Although many of

the expert’s opinions will likely be inadmissible at trial, I

will be in a better position to address the admissibility of

specific opinions during the trial rather than in a pretrial

setting. Defendants’ motion in limine (Doc. No. 45) is denied

without prejudice. 

Defendants shall file a motion to strike any opinions that

were not timely disclosed within 10 days. Any remaining motions

in limine addressing the expert’s testimony may be refiled with

the final pretrial statements pursuant to Local Rule 16.2. 

Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 77 Filed 08/19/09 Page 1 of 2
-2-

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 19, 2009

cc: Charles Raubicheck, Esq.

K. William Clauson, Esq.

Kevin Murphy, Esq.

Bradford T. Atwood, Esq.

Matthew R. Johnson, Esq.

Thomas B. Quarles, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00028-JL Document 77 Filed 08/19/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

AMY PHILBRICK, LLC . ,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No: 06-cv-254

v.

SN NIOBE, Official No. ME5800S,

her engines, machinery, equipment,

masts, etc., in rem ; and

The Estate of Stephen Woods,

State of New Hampshire, and Deborah

Woods in personam,

Defendants.

ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WARRANT OF MARITIME ARREST

Upon reading the Verified Complaint and Motion for court review of verifie d

complaint and supporting papers, the Court finding that the conditions for an action in rem

pursuant to Rules C and E, Fed . R. Civ. P., Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and

Maritime Claims, appear to exist, it is hereb y

ORDERED, that the Clerk shall issue a warrant of maritime arrest of the SN

NIOBE, Official No. ME5800S, as prayed for in the Complaint; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any person claiming an interest in the property

arrested pursuant to said Order shall, upon application to the Court, be entitled to a prompt

hearing at which the Plaintiff shall be required to show why the arrest should not be

vacated or other relief granted ; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order be attached to and served

with said warrant of maritime arrest.

Case 1:06-cv-00254-JD Document 9 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
Dated at Concord, New Hampshire this 17th day of July , 2006.

1s! Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

2

Case 1:06-cv-00254-JD Document 9 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NEW HAMPSHIRE

IN RE : Request from Spain

Pursuant to the Treaty

Between the United States o f

America and the Kingdom of ) No . ; , o L

Spain on Mutual

Assistance in Criminal Matters }

Regarding Artoun Ramian

L

ORDER

Upon application of the United States, and upon review o f

the request from Spain seeking evidence under the Treaty on

Mutual Assistance with the Kingdom of Spain, and the Court having

fully considered this matter ,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the authority conferred by

the Treatv between the United States of America and the Kingdom

of Spain on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ,1730 UNTS 113 ;

U .S .T . , as well as 28 U .S .C . § 1782 and this Court's

inherent authority, that persons within the jurisdiction of this

Court shall be required to provide testimony and produce

documents and other things in accordance with the Treaty Request

of January 31, 2002, without notice to the target or defendant in

the foreign criminal proceedings, and Assistant United States

Attorney Peter E . Papps is appointed as a Commissioner of this

Court ; to take such steps as are necessary, including the

Case 1:06-mc-00028-SM Document 3 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 2
issuance of Commissioner's subpoenas, to obtain the evidence

requested by thePreliminary investigating Court No . 2 of

Marbella, Spain in conformity with the request of January 31,

2002 ; to adopt such procedures for the receipt of the evidence as

are consistent with the use of the evidence within Spain ; to seek

such further orders of the Court as are necessary to execute this

request ; to certify the testimony and documents obtained and to

submit the evidence to the Office of International Affairs,

United States Department of Justice, for transmission to Spain ;

and to do all else that may be necessary for the accomplishment

of the purposes of this Order .

94

TED TATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated :

2

Case 1:06-mc-00028-SM Document 3 Filed 06/05/06 Page 2 of 2
#### MARTIN v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

Sept. 21, 1936.

Ray M. Watson, of Miami, for petitioner.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on exceptions to the return of the sheriff to a writ of habeas corpus issued pursuant to our opinion and judgment rendered herein on March 3, 1936, reported in 166 So. 467.

We treat the exceptions to the return as a motion to quash and, on authority of the opinion and judgment heretofore rendered above referred to, the exceptions considered as a motion to quash the return will be sustained and the petitioner ordered discharged.

So ordered.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-50-01-PB

Sheri Guerriero

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 6, 2006 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and engage in plea

negotiations. The government does not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and negotiate a plea agreement or properly

prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from June 6,

2006 to July 6, 2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the

court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the

above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00050-PB Document 12 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 22, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued 

until June 21, 2006 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 19, 2006

cc: Michael Ramsdell, Esq.

Robert Kinsella, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00050-PB Document 12 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 81 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36316) and Amendment No. 705 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
    of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual
    flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  September 6, 2019