alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	 

	 




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of August 29, 2019, by and between Mount Tam Biotechnologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Maker”), and Climate Change Investigation, Innovation and Investment Company, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Holder”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.Maker and Holder entered into that certain Line of Credit Agreement on May 10, 2019 (the “Loan Agreement”). 

 

B.In connection with the Loan Agreement, Maker and Holder entered into that certain Promissory Note effective as of May 1, 2019 (the “Note”).  

 

C.Maker and Holder have agreed to amend the Loan Agreement pursuant to Sections 5 and 8.5 thereof, pursuant to the terms set forth herein.  

 

D.Maker and Holder have agreed to amend the Note pursuant to the terms thereof, pursuant to the terms set forth herein. 

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.The Loan Agreement is hereby amended by extending the Maturity Date thereof this one and final time only to October 31, 2019. 

 

2.The Note is hereby amended by extending the Maturity Date thereof this one and final time only to October 31, 2019. 

 

3.This Amendment supersedes any and all other provisions of the Loan Agreement and Note which are in conflict with this instrument. 

 

4.This Amendment constitutes the full and complete agreement between the parties hereto.  All other provisions of the Loan Agreement and Note not modified herein shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

[Signature page follows]


 




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Line of Credit Agreement and Promissory Note effective as of the date set forth above.

 

 

 

	 

	MAKER:

 

Mount Tam Biotechnologies, Inc.

 

 

By:/s/ Richard Marshak 

Name:Richard Marshak 

Title:Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 


	 

	HOLDER:

 

Climate Change Investigation, Innovation and Investment Company, LLC

 

 

By:/s/ James J. Farrell 

Name:James J. Farrell 

Title: Manager 





Signature Page to First Amendment to Line of Credit Agreement and Promissory Note

4832-9389-1746
19

A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2003 Q3 survey,

region share of national

total 2.7 9.4 27.9 17.7 8.4 4.9 5.2 8.7 5.8 9.2

Sample coverage, 2003 Q3

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 17.7 5.9 20.8 13.9 24.0 13.2 9.4 9.1 13.6 55.5

Avg. loan size, 2003 Q4 survey

(thousands of dollars) 27.8 17.6 84.7 33.3 84.9 51.7 56.5 57.5 25.8 87.1

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

1997: Q4 9.2 9.5 9.3 9.8 7.5 9.8 9.4 9.4 10.1 8.8

1998: Q1 9.3 9.0 9.4 9.8 7.3 10.0 10.3 9.8 9.6 8.5

Q2 9.2 9.4 9.2 9.7 7.6 10.2 10.3 9.6 9.8 8.4

Q3 10.2 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.8 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.6 8.5

Q4 9.4 9.2 8.7 9.0 8.3 9.4 9.7 9.2 9.1 8.0

1999: Q1 8.4 8.9 8.9 9.1 8.2 9.0 9.6 9.1 9.0 7.5

Q2 9.6 9.1 8.8 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.8 9.0 8.7 8.0

Q3 10.2 8.9 8.7 9.3 8.2 8.9 10.0 8.8 9.0 8.5

Q4 9.1 9.2 8.8 9.4 8.3 8.8 9.8 9.0 9.5 8.8

2000: Q1 9.4 9.2 9.2 9.6 8.4 9.8 9.3 10.0 9.8 8.4

Q2 10.7 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.1 9.1 10.5 10.0 10.1 9.5

Q3 10.5 10.30 10.0 10.3 9.7 9.2 10.5 10.0 10.6 9.7

Q4 10.7 9.3 9.9 10.1 9.2 9.4 9.2 10.3 10.3 9.8

2001: Q1 9.3 9.1 9.4 9.7 8.4 7.8 9.5 9.0 9.8 8.8

Q2 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.8 7.4 8.1 8.3 9.2 8.6 7.9

Q3 8.3 9.8 7.9 8.2 6.3 7.6 8.7 8.8 7.8 7.2

Q4 6.9 7.9 6.3 7.0 5.2 6.3 8.7 7.6 6.1 5.2

(.23) (.78) (.38) (.29) (.36) (1.71) (.42) (.79) (.33) (.35)

2002: Q1 6.9 7.8 6.7 7.2 5.2 5.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 4.9

(.12) (.37) (.26) (.22) (.63) (1.14) (.39) (.45) (.26) (.25)

Q2 6.8 7.4 6.4 7.2 5.0 5.9 7.6 7.5 6.5 5.1

(.14) (.29) (.27) (.21) (.48) (1.03) (.23) (.34) (.36) (.26)

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.8 5.6 4.4 4.9 6.6 5.3 5.6 4.3

(.14) (.03) (.51) (.40) (.69) (.68) (.22) (.96) (.36) (.33)

Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5

(.35) (.45) (.47) (1.01) (.56) (.62) (.68) (.35) (.47) (.62)

2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.1 4.5

(.15) (.26) (.31) (.73) (.65) (.63) (.54) (.66) (.35) (.40)

Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2

(.29) (.17) (.37) (.34) (.71) (.63) (.45) (.71) (.36) (.50)

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

(.15) (.04) (.49) (.39) (.73) (.69) (.27) (.99) (.35) (.26)

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2

(.59) (.22) (.30) (.71) (.54) (.83) (.54) (.58) (.39) (.42)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is Delta

States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. They are

calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,735,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,735,926
<PP&E>                                       2,860,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,680)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,587,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          576,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,010,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,587,341
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,801
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            104,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.66
        


</TABLE>
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2019-B9 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.



Date:	March 30, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Benchmark 2019-B9 Certifications

---
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba

1991...... 100.0 4.3 7.6 32.2 39.2 13.3 2.5 .9 10.9 8.8 1.0 .7 

1992...... 100.0 2.0 5.3 25.3 41.1 19.6 5.1 1.6 12.5 11.3 1.2 1.0 

1993...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 27.8 40.4 18.4 4.6 1.3 12.3 12.3 1.2 1.1 

1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 

1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 

1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 

1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 

1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 

1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 

2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 

2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 

2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 

1998: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 3.3 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 6.4 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 9.1 1.0 .9 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 

1999: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 3.0 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 6.1 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.1 8.9 .9 .9 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 

2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.2 3.1 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.5 6.1 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 

2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3 

 Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6 

 Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8 

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 

 Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.

27
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                               Susan Glatthorn Johnson
                                               Senior Vice President
                                               Echelon International Corporation
                                               Phone:  727-803-8250
                                               E-mail: sjohnson@echelonintl.com

                                               Cynthia L. Sanders
                                               Manager of Financial Reporting
                                               Echelon International Corporation
                                               Phone:  727-803-8231

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                          E-mail:  csanders@echelonintl.com



                  ECHELON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION TO EXPLORE
              STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES TO MAXIMIZE SHAREHOLDER VALUE

                  St. Petersburg, FL, September 9, 1999 -- Echelon International
Corporation (NYSE:EIN) announced today that its Board of Directors has been
involved in a process to explore and review strategic alternatives to maximize
shareholder value for which it has retained Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Securities Corporation as its financial advisor. The Company has investigated
and continues to investigate a range of options, including the possible sale or
break-up of the Company or continuing to operate the business in accordance with
its strategic plan. There is no assurance that any transaction will result from
this exploration process.

                  Echelon International Corporation is a real estate company
which develops, owns and manages multi-family residential and commercial real
estate. The Company also owns and manages a portfolio of financial assets
consisting primarily of leased aircraft and other assets and collateralized
financings of commercial real estate and aircraft. The Company is continuing to
withdraw from the aircraft and real estate lending business and focus on its
core real estate operations.


                                      # # #
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DANIEL POLYANSKY,

Defendant.

4:23CR3065

ORDER

Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 

29), because Defendant and defense counsel need additional time to fully review 

the discovery. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set 

forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s motion to continue, (Filing No. 29), is granted.

2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before September 29, 

2023.

3) The conference call previously scheduled to be held on August 23, 

2023, is continued. A telephonic conference with counsel will be held 

before the undersigned magistrate judge at 10:30 a.m. on October 3, 

2023 to discuss setting any pretrial motion hearing needed, a 

change of plea hearing, or the date of the jury trial and deadlines for 

disclosing experts as required under Rule 16. Counsel for all parties 

shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to 

participate in the call.

4) The ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue 

outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy 

trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the 

motion, the time between today’s date and October 3, 2023 shall be 

deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the 

4:23-cr-03065-JMG-CRZ Doc # 30 Filed: 08/14/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 53
requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel 

have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately 

prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might 

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7). 

Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court’s 

local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03065-JMG-CRZ Doc # 30 Filed: 08/14/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 54
8:23-cv-00237-MDN   Doc # 1-1   Filed: 06/01/23   Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 9

8:23-cv-00237-MDN   Doc # 1-1   Filed: 06/01/23   Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 10
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0646

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MARK KAPPS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 6, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 30 2024

01/30/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0646
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v . Case No. 06-cr-97-1-3-4-6-S M

Edward Cervantes Arias

Leslie B. Smith Allen R . Hal

land Terri Hodgkins

ORDER

Defendant Terri Hodgkins's motion to continue the final pretria l

conference and trial is granted (document no . 83) . Trial has been rescheduled

for the January 2008 trial period . Defendant Hodgkins shall file a waiver of

speedy trial rights not later than December 3, 2007 . On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : December 17, 2007 at 3 :30 p .m.

Jury Selection : January 8, 2008 at 9 :30 a .m.

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 84 Filed 11/26/07 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

/s/ Steven J . McAuliffe

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

November 26, 2007

cc : Paul Garrity, Esq.

Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Jose A . Espinosa, Esq .

Michael Sheehan, Esq.

Clyde R.W.Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 84 Filed 11/26/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-45-04-PB

Ricardy Roseaux, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

July 10, 2007 trial in the above case, citing newly appointed

counsel’s need for additional time to prepare for trial. The

government and co-defendants do not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 10, 2007 to August 21, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00045-PB Document 68 Filed 05/24/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 19, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to

July 24, 2007 at 3:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 24, 2007

cc: David W. Ruoff, Esq.

Glenn Geiger, Esq.

Harry Batchelder, Esq.

R. Brian Snow, Esq.

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Peter Papps, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00045-PB Document 68 Filed 05/24/07 Page 2 of 2
#### PETERS v. TWOGOOD et al.

No. 15046.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 4, 1936.

For former opinion, see 167 So. 206.

Fred G. Veith, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Edw. M. Robbert, City Atty., and Wm. Boizelle, Asst. City Atty., both of New Orleans, for-appellee City of New Orleans.

PER CURIAM.

Our attention is directed to the fact that in our decree amending the judgment of the district court we failed to order the state tax collector to erase from the records of his office the inscription of the taxes for the years which we held were not collectible, and it is suggested that our decree be amended so as to read as follows: “For the reasons assigned it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is amended so as to order the State Tax Collector for 'the City of New Orleans and the City of New Orleans to erase all taxes assessed against the property described in plaintiff’s petition for the' year 1891 and all subsequent years up -to and including the year 1932 and declaring the sale by the City of New Orleans to the City of New Orleans for taxes for the.,years 1910, 1915 and 1921 to be null and void and ordering the cancellation of the recordation thereon in the Conveyance Office for the Parish of Orleans, and, as thus amended, the judgment is affirmed.”

It is ordered that the decree be amended as requested, and the application for rehearing refused.

Our original decree amended; rehearing refused.