alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.4

 

225 Franklin Street 18th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

T 877.526.3562

ngkf.com

Officer’s Certificate

Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Sub-Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a Senior Managing Director of Servicing and Asset Management of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Sub-Servicer during the preceding calendar year (or in the case of the first such certification, during the period from the Closing Date to December 31, 2019) (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |   |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |   |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

Dated: January 31, 2020

Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank

 /s/ Ronald Steffenino

Ronald Steffenino

Senior Managing Director

Servicing and Asset Management

 

 

BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Wells Fargo

 

----

 

Schedule I

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank as Primary Servicer

COMM 2014-CCRE20COMM 2015-CCRE24

COMM 2015-CCRE26GSMS 2015-GC28

GSMS 2015-GC34COMM 2015-LC23

CGCMT 2016-C1CFCRE 2016-C3

CFCRE 2016-C4SGCMS 2016-C5

CFCRE 2016-C6CFCRE 2017-C8

UBS 2017-C4UBS 2017-C6

UBS 2018-C10BBCMS 2018-C2 CGCMT 2018-C6

 

 

----

 

BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Wells Fargo
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2007


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(logo) LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as specialservicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for thetransactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject toany limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 19, 2019

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

**Schedule I**

WFCM 2018-C48

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Trust 2018-C45, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2018-C48

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

c/o Wells Fargo Securities,LLC

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York NY 10152

A.J. Sfarra

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

Wells Fargo Law Department,D1053-300

301 South College St.,

Charlotte NC 28202

Troy B. Stoddard

 

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation

Global Capital Markets

Structured Finance

1100 N. Market Street- 5thFloor

Wilmington DE 19890

Beverly D. Capers

 

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington DE 19890

Group
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 2002


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1350

To restore freedom of choice to women in the uniformed services serving

outside the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Ms. SANCHEZ (for herself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BACA, Mr.

BALDACCI, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. BERMAN, Mr.

BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. CAPUANO,

Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mrs.

DAVIS of California, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DELAHUNT, Ms. DELAURO, Mr.

DOOLEY of California, Mr. EVANS, Mr. FARR of California, Mr. FILNER,

Mr. FRANK, Mr. FROST, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

HOLT, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. LANTOS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs.

MALONEY of New York, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. MATSUI, Ms.

MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr.

MEEHAN, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr.

PALLONE, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SANDERS, Ms.

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SIMMONS, Ms. SOLIS, Mr.

STARK, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mrs. THURMAN, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr.

TIERNEY, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. WATERS, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr.

WEXLER, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. WYNN, and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To restore freedom of choice to women in the uniformed

services serving outside the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1350 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Choice

3 for Women in the Uniformed Services Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF PRIOR POLICY REGARDING RE5 STRICTIONS ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DE6 FENSE MEDICAL FACILITIES.

7 Section 1093 of title 10, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) RESTRICTION ON USE OF

10 FUNDS.—’’; and

11 (2) by striking subsection (b).

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130977 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130977 COA: 267118 Wayne CC: 01-013955-01 ERIC LANCE WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1523 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1523

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the age of persons 
    considered to be minors for the purposes of the prohibition on 
               transporting obscene materials to minors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

 Mr. Tancredo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the age of persons 
    considered to be minors for the purposes of the prohibition on 
               transporting obscene materials to minors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Material Unsuitable for Teens 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AGE INCREASE.

    Section 1470 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``16'' each place it appears and inserting ``18''.
                                 <all>
```
June 7, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MERCEDEZ LESHION JON ES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00630

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be certified below for

observan ce.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

TXU Corp.:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries (TXU
Corp.) for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and
2001, as indicated in our report dated November 13, 2002; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Corp.'s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-27989, 333-32831,
333-37652, 333-56055 as amended by Post-Effective Amendments No. 1 and 2
thereto, 333-64504, 333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01,
333-71004-02, 333-84418, 333-84418-01 and 333-84418-02 on Form S-3 and
Registration Statements No. 333-32833, 333-32835, 333-32837, 333-32839,
333-32841, 333-32843, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-93181 as amended by Post Effective
Amendments No. 1 and 2 thereto, 333-93183, 333-62016, 333-62014, 333-86640 and
333-92260 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                       365
<INVENTORY>                                     53,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,872
<PP&E>                                          26,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,733
<SALES>                                        153,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,869
<CGS>                                          124,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,095
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1291 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1291

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of 
    educational benefits for veterans under the Montgomery GI Bill.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1291

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of 
    educational benefits for veterans under the Montgomery GI Bill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Montgomery GI Bill 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE UNDER 
              MONTGOMERY GI BILL.

    (a) In General.--(1) Section 3015(a)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) for an approved program of education pursued on a 
        full-time basis, at the monthly rate of--
                    ``(A) for months occurring during fiscal year 2002, 
                $800,
                    ``(B) for months occurring during fiscal year 2003, 
                $950,
                    ``(C) for months occurring during fiscal year 2004, 
                $1,100, and
                    ``(D) for months occurring during a subsequent 
                fiscal year, the amount for months occurring during the 
                previous fiscal year increased under subsection (h); 
                or''.
    (2) Section 3015(b)(1) of such title is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) for an approved program of education pursued on a 
        full-time basis, at the monthly rate of--
                    ``(A) for months occurring during fiscal year 2002, 
                $650,
                    ``(B) for months occurring during fiscal year 2003, 
                $772,
                    ``(C) for months occurring during fiscal year 2004, 
                $894, and
                    ``(D) for months occurring during a subsequent 
                fiscal year, the amount for months occurring during the 
                previous fiscal year increased under subsection (h); 
                or''.
    (b) CPI Adjustment.--No adjustment in rates of educational 
assistance shall be made under section 3015(h) of title 38, United 
States Code, for fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 19, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael Ledger

v. Case No. 06-cv-411-SM

Ryan Le Vierge, et al. 

ORDER

Re: Document No. 7, Motion to Dismiss Count III

Ruling: Denied, without prejudice. As plaintiff points out,

there is no respondeat superior claim being advanced under 42

U.S.C. Section 1983, and, as defendant concedes, New Hampshire law

does not clearly bar respondeat superior claims against

governmental supervisors for the intentional torts of their

subordinates in all circumstances. The pertinent facts are

critical, and may or may not be contested, rendering dismissal of

Count III an inappropriate remedy at this stage. Finally,

defendant has not met his burden with respect to showing prejudice

under RSA 507-B:7. See , e.g., Farwell v. Town of Brookline, 

200 DNH 223. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: September 11, 2007

cc: Michael Sheehan, Esq. 

John Curran, Esq. 

Elizabeth Hurley, Esq. 

Case 1:06-cv-00411-SM Document 17 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-194-01-SM

Robert Cashmon

O R D E R

Defendant Cashmon’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 15). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 2008

trial period. Defendant Cashmon shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than November 19, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: December 19, 2007 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 8, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00194-SM Document 16 Filed 11/06/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

November 5, 2007

cc: Mark Howard, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00194-SM Document 16 Filed 11/06/07 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1684

For the relief of the Philippine citizens collectively referred to as the ‘‘Marcos

Entourage’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 2001

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the Philippine citizens collectively referred

to as the ‘‘Marcos Entourage’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR PAROL4 EES FROM THE ‘‘MARCOS ENTOURAGE’’.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, an alien described in subsection (d) shall be eligible

8 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im-
2

•HR 1684 IH

1 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjust2 ment of status to lawful permanent resident.

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If an alien described

4 in subsection (d) enters the United States before the filing

5 deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be con6 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall,

7 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

8 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

9 as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

14 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

15 (d) ALIENS DESCRIBED.—An alien is described in

16 this subsection is a Philippine citizen who—

17 (1) was paroled into the United States on Feb18 ruary 26, 1986, in order to travel to Hawaii with

19 President Ferdinand Marcos; or

20 (2) is a member of the family of an alien de21 scribed in paragraph (1) and was paroled into the

22 United States in order to follow to join that family

23 member.

24 (e) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

25 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res-
3

•HR 1684 IH

1 idence to an alien described in subsection (d), the Sec2 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

3 by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the

4 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

5 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

6 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli7 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

8 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth

9 under section 202(e) of such Act.

10 (f) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION TREAT11 MENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural parents,

12 brothers, and sisters of an alien described in subsection

13 (d) shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded

14 any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and

15 Nationality Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-204-01-SM

Van Hertel

O R D E R

Defendant Hertel’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 11). Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2007 

trial period. Defendant Hertel shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than February 7, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: March 23, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: April 3, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00204-SM Document 12 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

January 29, 2007

cc: Mark Sisti, Esq.

Jennifer Cole Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00204-SM Document 12 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2