alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.15




OMNIBUS
AGREEMENT EXTENSION




This
Omnibus Agreement Extension (“Agreement”) is entered into on December 17, 2008,
and is by and between EnerVest, Ltd., (f/k/a EnerVest Management Partners, Ltd.)
a Texas limited partnership (“EnerVest”) and EV Energy GP, LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the “General Partner”).





WHEREAS,
the Omnibus Agreement (the “First Omnibus Agreement”), was entered into on
September 29, 2006, by and among EnerVest, EV Management LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“EV Management”), the General Partner, EV Energy
Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), and EV
Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“OLP”). Any capitalized term
not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth therein;





WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 3.3 of the First Omnibus Agreement, EnerVest and the General
Partner determine the amount of general and administrative expenses that will be
properly allocated to the Partnership after December 31, 2008;





WHEREAS,
the First Omnibus Agreement automatically renews each year if it is not
terminated by either EnerVest or the General Partner; and





WHEREAS,
neither party has terminated the First Omnibus Agreement.





In
consideration of the premises and the covenants, conditions, and agreements
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, EnerVest and the General Partner
hereby agree as follows:





1.               The
First Omnibus Agreement shall continue in effect until December 31, 2009,
subject to termination or automatic renewal on such date as provided in the
First Omnibus Agreement.




2.               The
Partnership shall pay EnerVest a fee of $625,000 per month, $7.5 million
annually, for the services described in the First Omnibus Agreement, subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 3.3 therein.








Exhibit
10.15




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement on, and effective
as of, the date first set forth above.






ENERVEST,
      LTD.By:
                                              EnerVest
      Management GP, L.C.,

                                                its
      general partnerBy:
                                              /s/ Mark A. HouserMark
      A. HouserExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Operating OfficerEV ENERGY GP,
    L.P.By:
                                              EV
      Management, L.L.C.,a
      Delaware limited liability companyits
      General PartnerBy:
                                              /s/ Mark A. HouserMark
      A. Houser

                                                President
      and Chief Operating Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

BRENDAN WELCH,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DON A. STAGGS; CINDY BASSETT, and 

ZACHERY KELLER,

Defendants.

8:23CV239

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On July 8, 2024, the Clerk of 

the Court sent a Notice and General Order to Plaintiff at his last known address at the 

Valley County Jail and it was returned to this Court as undeliverable. See Filing No. 5. 

Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the Court informed of his current address at all times. 

See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform 

the Court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this 

Court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will 

result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management 

deadline in this case using the following text: September 4, 2024: check for address.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and 

Order to Plaintiff at his previous address: 404 Galway St., Greeley, Nebraska 68842.

8:23-cv-00239-JFB-PRSE Doc # 8 Filed: 08/05/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 30
2

Dated this 5th day of August, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00239-JFB-PRSE Doc # 8 Filed: 08/05/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 31
Case 1:06-cv-00404-JAW Document 10 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-00404-JAW Document 10 Filed 01/10/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MATTHEW TIMOTHY,

Defendant.

4:23CR3059

ORDER

Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 

27), because Defendant has new counsel who needs additional time to review 

this case and confer with the defendant. The motion to continue is unopposed. 

Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should 

be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s motion to continue, (Filing No. 27), is granted.

2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before February 13, 

2024.

3) The conference call previously scheduled to be held on December 

12, 2023, is continued. A telephonic conference with counsel will be 

held before the assigned magistrate judge at 9:00 a.m. on February 

20, 2024 to discuss setting any pretrial motion hearing needed, a 

change of plea hearing, or the date of the jury trial and deadlines for 

disclosing experts as required under Rule 16. Counsel for all parties 

shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to 

participate in the call.

4) The ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue 

outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy 

trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the 

motion, the time between today’s date and February 20, 2024 shall 

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-CRZ Doc # 28 Filed: 12/05/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 46
be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the 

requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel 

have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately 

prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might 

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7). 

Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court’s 

local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 5th day of December, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-CRZ Doc # 28 Filed: 12/05/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 47
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         1,436
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    16,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,942
<PP&E>                                         32,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (22,812)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 77,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          84,820
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,755)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   77,481
<SALES>                                        14,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,744
<CGS>                                          11,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (93)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   53
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.44)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hypertherm, Inc.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-373-JD

American Torch Tip Company

O R D E R

Hypertherm, Inc. moves for summary judgment on the

affirmative defenses of patent enforceability, patent validity,

and part of its infringement claim. In response, American Torch

Tip Company ("ATTC") asks that the time for its response to the

motion be stayed until after claim construction is complete. 

Hypertherm objects to a stay, arguing that claim construction

will not affect the issues raised in its motion.

In the court's experience, resolving claim construction 

tends to change the landscape of a patent case. Although

Hypertherm may be correct that claim construction would not

specifically affect the analysis of the issues raised in its

motion for summary judgment, the court cannot rule out other

changes, such as a reduction in ATTC's affirmative defenses,

which could make a decision on the motion unnecessary. Further,

the claim construction briefs have been submitted, and the

Markman hearing is scheduled for January 16 and 17, 2008.

Case 1:05-cv-00373-JD Document 151 Filed 12/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the defendant's motion to stay

its response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment

(document no. 144) is granted to the extent that the defendant's

response to the motion (document no. 133) will be due thirty days

after the claim construction order is issued unless a party files

a timely motion for reconsideration, in which case the time will

not begin to run until the court's order is issued resolving the

motion for reconsideration.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

December 20, 2007

cc: Jacob K. Baron, Esquire

Steven M. Bauer, Esquire

Seth M. Cannon, Esquire

Joseph A. Capraro, Jr., Esquire

Jeffery M. Cross, Esquire

Joseph T. Dattilo, Esquire

Myriah M. Gambrell-Glenn, Esquire

John P. Guenther, Esquire

Jamie N. Hage, Esquire

Nicholas K. Holmes, Esquire

Rhett R. Krulla, Esquire

Jonathan A. Lax, Esquire

Barbara L. Mandell, Esquire

Richard C. Nelson, Esquire

W. Scott O'Connell, Esquire

Jeremy P. Oczek, Esquire

Allan J. Sternstein, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00373-JD Document 151 Filed 12/20/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kathleen Scsannell

v.

Sears, Roebuck & Company

Civil No. 06-cv-227-JD

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 5.2

DOCUMENT/FILER: #27, Notice of Voluntary Dismissal , filed by Plaintiff

DATE FILED: March 28, 2007

The document above fails to comply with:

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 Stipulation is not signed by all parties to the action

It is herewith ordered that the document is stricken and must be refiled.

SO ORDERED.

March 30, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

District Judge

cc: Kenneth Barnes, Esq.

David Jaffe, Esq.

Michael Mankes, Esq.

Timothy Harrington, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00227-JD Document 29 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023298
<NAME> AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         390,064
<SECURITIES>                                   251,890
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,049,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         251,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,047,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,424,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,088
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,582,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,047,728
<SALES>                                        177,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,669
<CGS>                                           66,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  537,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               471,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (305,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,001
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (307,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (307,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55085-55086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22132]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces meetings of scientific peer 
review groups. The subcommittees listed below are part of the Agency's 
Health Services Research Initial Review Group Committee.
    The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. These discussions are 
likely to involve information concerning individuals associated with 
the applications, including assessments of their personal 
qualifications to conduct their proposed projects. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    1. Name of Subcommittee: Health System Research.
    Date: October 23, 2008 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on October 
23 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott RIO, Conference Room TBD, 9751 Washingtonian 
Blvd., Rockville, Maryland 20878.

    2. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Research Training.
    Date: October 23-24, 2008 (Open from 9 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. on 
October 23 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott RIO, Conference Room TBD, 9751 Washingtonian 
Blvd., Rockville, Maryland 20878.

    3. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Technology and Decision 
Sciences.
    Date: October 29, 2008 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on October 
29 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott RIO, Conference Room TBD, 9751 Washingtonian 
Blvd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878.

    4. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Quality and Effectiveness 
Research.
    Date: October 30, 2008 (Open from 8:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on 
October 30 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Marriott RIO, Conference Room TBD, 9751 Washingtonian 
Blvd, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of the meetings 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Conmiittee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 2000, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.

[[Page 55086]]

    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: September 15, 2008.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. E8-22132 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
EXHIBIT
32





AMASYS
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)








Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Amasys Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








October
      20, 2008/s/
      C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-121- 01-PB

Christopher Aldrich

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

November 7, 2006 trial in the above case. Defendant is currently

being held in a medical facility in South Carolina and moves for

additional time to allow his attorney to travel there to meet

with him, review voluminous discovery, and prepare a defense or

consider plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and in order to allow the

parties additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from November 7, 2006 to February 6,

2007. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds 

Case 1:06-cr-00121-PB Document 23 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 2
2

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

The October 23, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

until January 18, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 23, 2006

cc: Sven Wiberg, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00121-PB Document 23 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1161 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1161

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
    To authorize the Government of the Czech Republic to establish a 
     memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Government of the Czech Republic is authorized 
to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk on the Federal land 
in the District of Columbia.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with the 
Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), except that sections 
2(c), 6(b), 8(b), and 10(c) of that Act shall not apply with respect to 
the memorial.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

    The United States Government shall not pay any expense for the 
establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
3.12 U.S. RESERVE ASSETS

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2002 2003 2004

2005 2006

Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr.p

1 Total ................................. 79,006 85,938 86,824 71,273 70,218 68,773 65,125 65,594 65,365 65,355 66,848

2 Gold stock1 ............................ 11,043 11,043 11,045 11,041 11,041 11,041 11,043 11,044 11,044 11,044 11,043

3 Special drawing rights2,3 ................. 12,166 12,638 13,582 8,245 8,224 8,180 8,210 8,302 8,310 8,344 8,518

4 Reserve position in International Monetary Fund2 ............................ 21,979 22,535 19,479 13,245 12,720 12,097 8,036 7,639 7,638 7,376 7,219

5 Foreign currencies4 ..................... 33,818 39,722 42,718 38,742 38,234 37,445 37,839 38,609 38,372 38,592 40,068

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF have also been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2002 2003 2004

2005 2006

Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr.p

1 Deposits .............................. 136 162 80 96 88 82 83 83 82 84 86

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 678,106 845,080 1,041,215 1,056,594 1,060,857 1,073,710 1,069,014 1,080,198 1,105,178 1,103,810 1,097,103

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 9,045 8,971 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967

Note: The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.