alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Honorary Consultant Cooperation Agreement


 




EXHIBIT 10.7

Honorary Consultant Cooperation Agreement




Party A: Bao Feng Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

Party B: Lin feng

ID number:350402198001040057

Party A invites Party B to be Party A's honorary consultant for its development needs. After consultation between the two parties, the following agreements are concluded:

I. Scope of Agreement

Party A and Party B jointly carry out project application, project cooperation, product development and technology landing and other cooperation projects. The ownership of the results shall be discussed according to the specific study of the project.

Party A provides technical guidance for project design and data analysis.

Party B provides suggestions and opinions on brain neuromedicine.

Other things depend on specific project negotiation.

II. Term of contract

This Agreement shall enter into force on the date of signature (seal) by both parties and shall be valid for 2 years.

III. Dispute Settlement

Any disputes arising from or relating to this contract shall be settled through consultation between the two parties.

IV. Unfinished Matters






 




For matters not covered in this Agreement, a supplementary agreement shall be made after consultation between the two parties. The Supplementary Agreement shall be an annex to this Agreement and shall have the same effect as this Agreement.




Supplementary articles

1. This Agreement is in duplicate and each party holds one copy. Each text of the agreement has the same legal effect.

2. This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by all parties.




Signature date: Year, month and day




Party A (seal):

Legal representative or authorized representative (signature):




Party B (seal):

Legal representative or authorized representative (signature):







林枫 Lin Feng 主治医师Associate chief physician

The First Hospital of Sanming city, Fujian province




Good at: epilepsy and seizure diseases, sleep disorders diagnosis and treatment, and eeg, brain function monitoring, electromyography, evoked potential and cranial magnetic stimulation diagnosis and treatment technology.






 




Academic position: member of Fujian epilepsy and electroencephalography group

Individual honors: won the second prize of Fujian provincial physician skill competition and outstanding young physician of Sanming first hospital


































荣誉顾问合作协议




甲方:宝枫生物科技(北京)有限公司

乙方:  

身份证号:

甲方因发展需要,邀请乙方为甲方荣誉顾问,经双方协商,订立如下协议:

一、协议范围

甲方与乙方联合进行课题申请,项目合作,产品研发和技术落地等合作项目。成果所属权,根据项目具体研究讨论。

甲方提供项目设计以及数据分析的技术指导;

乙方提供脑神经医学问题的建议及意见;






 




其他事物以具体项目协商而定。

二、期限

本协议自双方签字(盖章)之日起生效,有效期为 2  年。

三、争端解决

因本合同引起的或与本合同有关的任何争议,双方协商解决。

四、未尽事宜

本协议未尽事宜,由双方协商后另立补充协议约定。补充协议应作为本协议的附件,与本协议具有相同效力。

 

附则

1、本协议一式二份,协议各方各执一份。各份协议文本具有同等法律效力。

2、本协议经各方签署后生效。

 

签署时间:         年         月        日

 

甲方(盖章):

法定代表人或授权代表(签字):



乙方(盖章):

法定代表人或授权代表(签字):
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1329

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for

increasing research activities permanent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 2001

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

the credit for increasing research activities permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESEARCH CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for increasing re6 search activities) is amended by striking subsection (h).

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of

8 section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub9 paragraph (D).
2

•HR 1329 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

3 June 30, 2004.

Æ
ACCEPTED06-14-00190-CRSIXTH COURT OF APPEALSTEXARKANA, TEXAS4/30/2015 11:14:58 AMDEBBIE AUTREYCLERK
|Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Linens n Things, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended April 5, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Giles, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:


     (1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 /s/ William T. Giles
Name:   William T. Giles
Title:      Executive Vice President,
               Chief Financial Officer
Date:     May 20, 2003



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF L.L.B., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.H., NATURAL FATHER :

:

:

: No. 19 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of March , 2020, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-100-JD

HemCon, Inc.

Procedural Order

At this stage of the trial, the prior art references are

established, based on the evidence that has been submitted. The

parties shall compile a joint list of the prior art references

that will be used in the jury instructions. The joint list shall

be filed on or before Wednesday, April 21, 2010, at 5:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

April 21, 2010

cc: Julie M. Baher, Esquire

Garet K. Galster, Esquire

Daniel R. Johnson, Esquire

Heather E. Krans, Esquire

Joseph A. Kromholz, Esquire

Lynda Q. Nguyen, Esquire

Brian M. Poissant, Esquire

Daniel D. Ryan, Esquire

Ognian V. Shentov, Esquire

Jonathan M. Shirley, Esquire

Daniel E. Will, Esquire

Leigh S. Willey, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00100-JD Document 322 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-42-01-SM

Thomas Lavery

O R D E R

Defendant Lavery’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 11). Trial has been rescheduled for the September 

2006 trial period. Defendant Lavery shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than June 1, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 28, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 6, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 12 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 24, 2006

cc: Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 12 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Carl ROUSSEL and Lyn Roussel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MUNICIPALITY OF BOSSIER CITY; David Jones; Don Williams; Jeffrey Darby; P.O. DePrang; Faye Rawls; James W. Rogers, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. M 02-30965.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 7, 2003.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiffs bring various constitutional and state law claims regarding the denial of their applications to operate a sexually oriented business. After a bench trial, the district court concluded that the ordinance at issue was a valid time, place, and manner regulation, and entered judgment for defendants.

We have read the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. On the basis of well settled law in this circuit and in the Supreme Court, the judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven A. Swan

v. Civil No. 06-cv-404-PB

United States of America

ORDER

Re: Document No. 3, Motion to Appoint Counsel

Ruling: Denied without prejudice to refile if an evidentiary

hearing is warranted. See Rule 8(c) 2255 Proceedings. Since the

basis for the petition is straight forward and based upon factual

allegations not legal propositions, counsel is not necessary at

this point. I exercise my discretion, therefore, to deny

appointment of counsel at this time. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.

James R. Muirhead

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Date: November 17, 2006

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

 William E. Morse, Esq.

 

 

Case 1:06-cv-00404-JAW Document 5 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1602

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an employee’s ‘‘regular rate’’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation

will not be affected by certain additional payments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. BALLENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide

that an employee’s ‘‘regular rate’’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Perform5 ance in Compensation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REGULAR RATE FOR OVERTIME PURPOSES.

7 Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

8 is amended—
2

•HR 1602 IH

1 (1) by inserting before the semicolon at the end

2 of paragraph (3) the following: ‘‘; or (d) the pay3 ments are made to reward an employee or group of

4 employees for meeting or exceeding the productivity,

5 quality, efficiency, or sales goals as specified in a

6 gainsharing plan, incentive bonus plan, commission

7 plan, or performance contingent bonus plan’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘A plan described in clause (d) of paragraph (3) shall be

10 in writing and made available to employees, provide that

11 the amount of the payments to be made under the plan

12 be based upon a formula that is stated in the plan, and

13 be established and maintained in good faith for the pur14 pose of distributing to employees additional remuneration

15 over and above the wages and salaries that are not de16 pendent upon the existence of such plan or payments made

17 pursuant to such plan.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2006,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-190-PB

Carlos Perez

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

April 3, 2007 trial in the above case, citing newly appointed

counsel and the need for additional time to review discovery and

engage in further plea negotiations. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, to allow the parties additional time to

finalize a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from April 3, 2007 to July 10,

2007. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00190-PB Document 24 Filed 03/27/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on June 19,

2007 at 3:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 27, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Robert Veiga, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00190-PB Document 24 Filed 03/27/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated August 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1953 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-230876) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


August 16, 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALEXZANDRA BLANCO, 

Defendant. 

8:23CR117 

ORDER 

 

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Extend Deadline for Pretrial 

Motions, (Filing No. 52). The motion is unopposed by the government and the co-defendant. For 

good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1) Defendant’s Motion to Extend Deadline for Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 52), is 

granted. 

2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by December 6, 2023. 

3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between November 6, 2023 and

December 6, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time 

under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would 

deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. 

The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this 

court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. 

 Dated this 7th day of November, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00117-BCB-SMB Doc # 53 Filed: 11/07/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 98
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00213

- CV

Maria Eugenia FREEZE

, Appellant

v.

Erwin Florentino RAMIREZ,

Appelle e

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 15361 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s brief wa s due on July 5, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On the due date, Appellant filed a first motion for a forty

- five day extension of time to file her brief until August 20, 2018

. Appellant ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief is due on August 20, 2018

. Further motions for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief are discouraged.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1786-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1786-DR), dated September 2, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 10, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 2, 2008.

Catahoula, Franklin, Grant, LaSalle, St. Helena, and Washington Parishes for Individual Assistance (already designated for emergency protective measures (Category B), including direct Federal assistance under the Public Assistance.)

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-21771 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P