alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1518

To require the Secretary of the Interior to include on the National Register

of Historic Places the Avery Point Lighthouse in Groton, Connecticut,

and provide $200,000 for the restoration of that lighthouse.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. SIMMONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior to include on the

National Register of Historic Places the Avery Point

Lighthouse in Groton, Connecticut, and provide

$200,000 for the restoration of that lighthouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Avery Point Light5 house Restoration Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 1518 IH

1 (1) The Coast Guard built the Avery Point

2 Lighthouse in Groton, Connecticut, as a memorial to

3 lighthouse keepers.

4 (2) The Avery Point Lighthouse is the only

5 such memorial in the Nation.

6 (3) Because of years of neglect, the Avery Point

7 Lighthouse has suffered substantial deterioration.

8 (4) Restoration of the Avery Point Lighthouse

9 to its original state will cost $300,000.

10 SEC. 3. INCLUSION ON NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC

11 PLACES AND RESTORATION FUNDING FOR

12 AVERY POINT LIGHTHOUSE.

13 (a) INCLUSION ON NATIONAL REGISTER OF HIS14 TORIC PLACES.—The Secretary of the Interior shall in15 clude on the National Register of Historic Places the

16 Avery Point Lighthouse, located in Groton, Connecticut,

17 on the Avery Point campus of the University of Con18 necticut.

19 (b) RESTORATION FUNDING.—From amounts appro20 priated to carry out the National Historic Preservation

21 Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.) for fiscal year 2002, the Sec22 retary of the Interior shall provide $200,000 for the res23 toration of the Avery Point Lighthouse to the University

24 of Connecticut Fund, Incorporated (a nonprofit corpora-
3

•HR 1518 IH

1 tion incorporated under the laws of the State of Con2 necticut).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         362,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  231,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,927,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,608,016
<PP&E>                                       7,907,595
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,133,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,502,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,721,191
<BONDS>                                      3,024,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,584,708
<COMMON>                                    10,604,534
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,432,171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,502,825
<SALES>                                      2,255,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,257,288
<CGS>                                        1,948,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,948,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (719,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (719,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (719,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER08-777-002] 

Take notice that on September 12, 2008, Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar), and Kansas Gas and Electric Company hereby submit for filing revised tariff sheets to Attachment H-1 of Westar's Open Access Transmission Tariff. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 pm Eastern Time on October 3, 2008.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22283 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Second Department,

January, 2006

(January 10, 2006)

#### ATIFA, Doing Business as Masjid Hazrat Abubakr, Respondent, v Mohammed Akbar Shairzad, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Masjid Hazrat Abubakr, Appellant, v ATIFA, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

[806 NYS2d 435]

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the defendants in Action No. 1 from entering upon real property located at 141-47 33rd Avenue, Flushing, New York, and for an accounting, and a related action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that legal and equitable title to the real property located at 141-47 33rd Avenue and 141-49 33rd Avenue, Flushing, New York, belongs to the plaintiff in Action No. 2, which were joined for trial, (1) the defendant Mohammed Akbar Shairzad in Action No. 1 appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), entered August 25, 2004, which, in effect, upon granting the motion of the plaintiff in Action No. 1 pursuant to CELR 4401, made at the close of all the evidence, for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in Action No. 1, and (2) the plaintiff in Action No. 2 appeals from a judgment of the same court, also entered August 25, 2004, which, in effect, upon granting the motion of the defendant in Action No. 2 pursuant to CELR 4401, made at the close of all the evidence, for judgment as a matter of law on its counterclaims and to dismiss the complaint, is in favor of the defendant and against it in Action No. 2, and declared that the defendant in Action No. 2 is the lawful owner and is vested with absolute title to the property located at 141-49 33rd Avenue, Flushing, New York.

Ordered that the judgments are reversed, on the law and the *528facts, the motions are denied, the pleadings are reinstated, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Based upon this record, we find that questions of fact existed at the conclusion of the parties’ evidence that required determination by the jury *(see generally*CPLR 4401; *Singer v Long Is. Light. Co.,*211 AD2d 779, 780 [1995]). H. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DILLON M. SALVO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 8:23CR119

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue 

Trial [62]. For the reasons set forth in motion, the undersigned magistrate judge finds 

good cause for the requested continuance. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [62] is granted, as 

follows:

1. The jury trial, now set for May 7, 2024, is continued to August 6, 2024.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as 

a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date 

and August 6, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of 

time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a 

continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel, and 

would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & 

(B)(iv).

DATED: April 22, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00119-BCB-MDN Doc # 63 Filed: 04/22/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 105
#### SPLANE et al. v. TUBRE et al.

No. 2315.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 17, 1942.

For former opinion, see 6 So.2d 361.

Haas & Haas, of Opelousas, and O. E. Guillory and Roland B. Reed, both of Ville Platte, for appellants.

L. B. Sandoz, of Opelousas, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In the application for a rehearing filed herein, the defendants complain of the opinion and decree handed down in only one respect; viz., that the judgment of the lower court should have been amended so as to require plaintiffs to pay the defendant Haas Land Co., Ltd., $19.35 for the taxes paid in November, 1932, instead of *699$16.10 as awarded in the judgment of the lower court; that the judgment should be further amended by requiring plaintiffs to repay the said land company all taxes paid by it after March, 1938, and that the plaintiffs should be cast for the costs of the appeal.

A re-examination of the record shows that the judgment of the lower court followed the supplemental and amended answer filed by the defendant Haas Land Co., Ltd., as shown on page 25 of the transcript, in fixing the amount of taxes paid by this defendant on the property and which were to be refunded to it by the plaintiffs. Furthermore, on the trial of the case, which took place in 1941, it was admitted by counsel on both sides that the Haas Land Co., Ltd., had paid taxes on the property as set forth in 'the supplemental and amended answer filed on June 10, 1938. In no part of the record do we find any evidence showing that the defendant paid any other taxes on the property other than those shown in the supplemental and amended answer aforesaid.

For these reasons, the application for rehearing is refused.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER08-100-002, ER07-265-002]


Sempra Energy Trading LLC, Sempra Energy Solutions LLC; Notice of 
Filing

September 17, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 11, 2008, Sempra Energy Trading LLC, 
and Sempra Energy Solutions LLC (together Sellers) filed a response to 
Commission staff regarding its June 30, 2008 filing, affirming that 
none of the Sellers or any of their affiliates has erected or will 
erect barriers to entry into the relevant market.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="20666572636f4e4c494e45735550504f525460464552430e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 2, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22267 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 12, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 12, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0091. ARK TEMPORARY STAFFING, INC. v. MADISON INSURANCE GROUP, 

INC. et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

16A07246
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-130-01/04-SM

Corey Donovan, Micah Donovan,

Ian Burns and Jay Lawrence

O R D E R

Defendants Ian Burns and Micah Donovan's assented-to motions to continue the trial

(document no. 37 and 38) are granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2007

trial period. Defendants Burns and Micah Donovan shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights

not later than June 29, 2007. On the filing of the waivers, their continuances shall be

effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:07-cr-00130-SM Document 39 Filed 06/22/07 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: September 28, 2007 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: October 10, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

June 22, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Terry Ollila, Esq.

 Liam D. Scully, Esq.

 Mark Sisti, Esq.

 Paul Garrity, Esq.

 Sven Wiberg, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00130-SM Document 39 Filed 06/22/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-200-01-SM

Kanhnha Sao

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 19) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2009 trial period. Defendant shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than February 2, 2009. On the filing of

such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:07-cr-00200-SM Document 20 Filed 02/03/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: April 14, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Jury Selection: April 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

February 3, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00200-SM Document 20 Filed 02/03/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Rosemary A. Gilroy

v.

Ameriquest Mortgage Company and

AMC Mortgage Services, Inc.

No. 07-fp-074

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-074-JD.

SO ORDERED.

__________________

. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 23, 2007

cc: Rosemary A. Gilroy, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00074-JD Document 3 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

TXU Corp 

1601 Bryan Street 

Dallas, TX 75201 

 

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unauditedcondensed consolidated interim financial information of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries (TXU Corp.) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2005; because we didnot perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

 

We areaware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-37652, 333-64504,333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01, 333-71004-02, 333-84418, 333-84418-01, 333-84418-02, 333-110125 and Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-103922, and 333-115159 on Form S-3; Registration Statement No. 333-125815 on Form S-4;and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32833, 333-32837, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-62014, 333-92260, 333-105133 and Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-125169 on Form S-8. 

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of theRegistration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

 

/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

November 7, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel E. Ayer, Sr. 

v. Case No. 07-cv-304-SM

Warden, New Hampshire

State Prison

ORDER

Petitioner has not filed a 90-day status report as ordered. 

Accordingly, within 30 days, Petitioner must either file a status 

report or show cause why the stay should not be terminated and the 

petition dismissed for failure to demonstrate exhaustion of all

claims.

Date: November 7, 2012 ____________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

U.S. District Judge

cc: Daniel E. Ayer, Sr., pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00304-SM Document 43 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), we, Jeffrey H. Coats, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Curtis E. DeWalt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange




Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jeffrey H. CoatsJeffrey H. CoatsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2010





/s/ Curtis E. DeWaltCurtis E. DeWaltSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2010




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.