alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1445

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require candidates

for election to the House of Representatives or Senate to raise not

less than 50 percent of their contributions from residents of the States

the candidates seek to represent and not less than 50 percent of their

contributions from individuals, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself and Mr. GALLEGLY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

require candidates for election to the House of Representatives or Senate to raise not less than 50 percent

of their contributions from residents of the States the

candidates seek to represent and not less than 50 percent

of their contributions from individuals, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1445 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIRING NOT LESS THAN 50 PERCENT OF

2 CANDIDATE FUNDS TO COME FROM RESI3 DENTS OF STATE INVOLVED AND INDIVID4 UALS.

5 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(i)(1) With respect to each reporting period for an

9 election—

10 ‘‘(A) not less than 50 percent of the total of

11 contributions accepted by a candidate for the office

12 of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resi13 dent Commissioner to, the Congress shall be from

14 individuals; and

15 ‘‘(B) not less than 50 percent of the total of

16 contributions accepted by a candidate for the office

17 of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resi18 dent Commissioner to, the Congress shall be from

19 residents of the State in which the Senate seat or

20 congressional district involved (as the case may be)

21 is located.

22 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1)(B), a political

23 committee shall be considered to be a resident of the State

24 included in the committee’s address provided on its state25 ment of organization under section 303(b).’’.
3

•HR 1445 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING BUNDLING OF CONTRIBUTIONS.

2 Section 315(a)(8) of the Federal Election Campaign

3 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(8)) is amended to read

4 as follows:

5 ‘‘(8) No person may make a contribution through an

6 intermediary or conduit, except that a person may facili7 tate a contribution by providing—

8 ‘‘(A) advice to another person as to how the

9 other person may make a contribution; and

10 ‘‘(B) addressed mailing material or similar

11 items to another person for use by the other person

12 in making a contribution.’’.

13 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

14 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

15 respect to elections occurring after December 31, 2002.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.01  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  I, John Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
  Date: November 15, 2010
  By:  /s/ John Hummel
 John Hummel
 President (principal executive and principal financial officer)
 AIS Futures Management LLC
 General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
              S-2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-156-02-PB

Troy Cote

O R D E R

On October 29, 2012, the defendant appeared for an initial

appearance on a supervised release violation issued on October

24, 2012. The defendant stipulated to “probable cause” and

requested a detention hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6), the defendant bears the burden of

establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he will not

flee and that he poses no danger to any other person or to the

community. Based on the content of the supervised release

violation as well as the proffers presented at the hearing, and

for the reasons more fully stated on the record (including the

court’s colloquy with defense counsel), the court finds the

defendant has failed to meet this burden and that there are no

conditions that are likely to assure the safety of the community. 

Most pertinent to this decision is the lack of efficacy of his

repeated prior treatment opportunities and his inability to abide

by conditions of release, which together present a danger to the

Case 1:06-cr-00156-PB Document 66 Filed 10/29/12 Page 1 of 2
community as poignantly evidenced by the recent drug overdose

death of a female associate while in his presence. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending a final revocation hearing. The final revocation hearing

will be scheduled before Judge Barbadoro on November 20, 2012, at

11:00 am. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Daniel J. Lynch

Daniel J. Lynch

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 29, 2012

cc: Counsel of Record

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

2

Case 1:06-cr-00156-PB Document 66 Filed 10/29/12 Page 2 of 2
Presidential Determination No. 2008-25 of August 28, 2008

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

# Emergency Fund Drawdown to Assist Georgian Victims of Conflict

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including sections 2 and 4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the “Act”), as amended, (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 2603) and section 301 of title 3, United States Code:

(1) I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, in an amount not to exceed $5.75 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to the humanitarian needs of conflict victims and those displaced by recent violence in Georgia.

(2) I hereby assign to you the functions of the President in relation to this memorandum under section 2(d) of the Act, and of establishing terms and conditions under section 2(c)(1) of the Act, and you may further assign such functions to your subordinates, consistent with applicable law.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the 
                    *Federal Register*.



[FR Doc. E8-21975 Billing code 4710-10-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1583 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1583

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 121 West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, as the ``Lee H. 
        Hamilton Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 121 
West Spring Street in New Albany, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AMY JACOBY,

Defendants.

8:23CR126

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion 

Deadline. (Filing No. 50). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause shown, 

the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline (Filing No. 50), is 

granted.

2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by November 6, 2023.

3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and 

November 6, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time 

under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would 

deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. 

The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under 

this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 5th day of October, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00126-RFR-MDN Doc # 51 Filed: 10/05/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 98
Case 1:05-cv-00109-PB Document 71 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32(a)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of
2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, John F. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this
28thday of October, 2010.



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNGName:

John F. YoungTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Energy Future Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-178-01-SM

Francisco David Avalos-Morfin

ORDER

Re: Document No. 20, Defendant’s Motion to Reduce Sentence

Ruling: Denied. Defendant’s motion is difficult to

understand. He does not specifically invoke relief under the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, but, on the other hand, he

does seem to be challenging his sentence based upon the “plain

error doctrine” or upon United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), or both. Booker removed the mandatory character of the

Sentencing Guidelines, but that decision was handed down well

before Defendant was sentenced, and defendant received the full

benefit of that decision at his sentencing hearing. The motion is

without merit with respect to the only substantive issue the court

can identify, and the records and pleadings conclusively show that

defendant is entitled to no relief. Accordingly, the motion,

construed as a general motion for appropriate relief, is denied.

(It would appear that the time in which defendant might file a

motion under Section 2255 has expired, and this motion may have

been untimely under the one-year limitations period, absent “mail

rule” relief. But even if construed as a Section 2255 motion, the

outcome would be identical).

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: June 26, 2008

cc: Francisco Avalos-Morfin, pro se

Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cr-00178-SM Document 21 Filed 06/26/08 Page 1 of 1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

A ppellate case name: Jacqueline Alexander v. Reserve at Autumn Creek

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00212

- CV

Trial court case number: 1027479

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1 of Harris County

On March 27, 2013 , appellant Jacqueline Alexander filed an affidavit of indigence in the

trial court in the above

- referenced appeal , and on March 28, 2013, the county clerk timely filed a

contest to the affidavit

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(e). On April 2, 2013, the trial court timely signed an order sustaining the contest to the affidavit. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(i)(4). If appellant wished to challenge the order sustaining the contest, a ppellant was required to file a

mo tion challenging the order no later than April 12, 2013. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(i)(2). No timely motion challenging the order sustaining the contest was filed. Accordingly, appellant is not entitled to proceed on appeal without payment of costs.

Appe llant is ORDERED to pay the filing fee of $175.00 to this Court no later than 10 days from the date of this order, or the appeal will be dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirement s for establishing indigence)

, 42.3 (allowing involuntary dismissal); see also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 51.207 ( West Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) ( West 2005), § 101.041 ( West Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil C ases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX

. R. A PP

. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals).

Appellant is fur ther ORDERED to file within 30 days of the date of this order proof that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record or this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3 (b); 42.3(b).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 14, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christopher I . Blanchard

V .

U .S . Social SecuritV Administration,

Commissioner

No . 06-fp-13 8

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-138-JD .

SO ORDERED .

ams.s' R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judg e

Date : April 14, 200 6

cc : Bennett B . Mortell, Esq .

Case 1:06-cv-00138-JD Document 3 Filed 04/14/06 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1579

For the relief of Juan Gonzalez and Mayra Valenzuela.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 24, 2001

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Juan Gonzalez and Mayra Valenzuela.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JUAN

4 GONZALEZ AND MAYRA VALENZUELA

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Juan Gonzalez and Mayra Valenzuela shall each be

8 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust9 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

10 permanent residence upon filing an application for
2

•HR 1579 IH

1 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such

2 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi3 dent.

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Juan Gonzalez or

5 Mayra Valenzuela enters the United States before the fil6 ing deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall

7 be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and

8 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of

9 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation10 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

11 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

12 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap13 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica14 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

15 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Juan Gonzalez and Mayra Valenzuela, the Sec19 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

20 by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

22 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

23 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli24 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made
3

•HR 1579 IH

1 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

2 under section 202(e) of such Act.

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Juan Gonzalez and Mayra

6 Valenzuela shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac7 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra8 tion and Nationality Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-144-01-PB

Holland Smith

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the October 4, 2005

trial in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional

time to negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from October 4, 2005 to December 6,

2005. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00144-PB Document 20 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The September 19, 2005 final pretrial conference is

continued until November 28, 2005 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 19, 2005

cc: Paul Haley, Esq.

Donald Feith, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00144-PB Document 20 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**March 2004**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: March 31, 2004**
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-13-00257-CR 

________________________

MAXINE JULIE BALDERAZ, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 181st District Court 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 22,499-B; Honorable John Board, Presiding 

 

August 21, 2013 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Maxine Julie Balderaz, has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Appeal. As 

required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is 

signed by Appellant and her attorney. No decision of this Court having been delivered, 

the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be 

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.