alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINA L APP EALS OF TEX AS NO. WR-79,118-05
IN RE KENN ETH WAYNE JEROME, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1233728 IN THE 263 DISTRICT COURT r d F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has f

iled a mot ion for leave to file an a pplication for a

writ of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 263 District Court of Har ris County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and rd that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court enter ed an or der de signating issues on Apr il 3, 2013. Respondent, the J udg e of the 263 District Court of Har ris County , shall file a response with rd this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the alterna tive, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order desig nating issues and then have2

the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this o rd er . T h i s appli cation for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abe y ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed his response
.

Filed: Jul y

29, 2015 Do not publish
Exhibit 35.6  LOGO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF LNR PARTNERS, LLC The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:  1.
A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,
2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule Ihereto) (the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made
under my supervision; and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122
of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.   LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob Warshaw President
 Dated: February 19, 2019   1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700
 Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164 Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601




---

Schedule I Benchmark 2018-B7 Benchmark 2018-B2 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2018-B2 (Dumbo Heights Portfolio- CGCMT 2018-C6) Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Group Email Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10020 James Y. Lee Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 1585 Broadway New York NY 10036 Jane Lam Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Att: {Pool Name} New York NY 10016 Group Refer to Vickie Taylor BX Trust 2018-MCSF Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road ATTN: {pool name} Columbia MD 21045 1951 Corporate Trust (CMBS) Bond Group Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia MD 21045 Group Notices Wilmington Trust, National Association 1100 North Market Street Wilimington DE 19890 Dorri Costello
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1384 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1384

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route in 
  Arizona and New Mexico which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian 
 tribes were forced to walk in 1863 and 1864, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1384

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route in 
  Arizona and New Mexico which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian 
 tribes were forced to walk in 1863 and 1864, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Walk National Historic Trail 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Beginning in the fall of 1863 and ending in the winter 
        of 1864, the United States Government forced thousands of 
        Navajos and Mescalero Apaches to relocate from their ancestral 
        lands to Fort Sumner, New Mexico, where the tribal members were 
        held captive, virtually as prisoners of war, for over 4 years.
            (2) Thousands of Native Americans died at Fort Sumner from 
        starvation, malnutrition, disease, exposure, or conflicts 
        between the tribes and United States military personnel.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(____) The Long Walk Trail, a series of routes which the Navajo 
and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes were forced to walk beginning in the 
fall of 1863 as a result of their removal by the United States 
Government from their ancestral lands, generally located within a 
corridor extending through portions of Canyon de Chelley, Arizona, and 
Albuquerque, Canyon Blanco, Anton Chico, Canyon Piedra Pintado, and 
Fort Sumner, New Mexico.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Terry L. SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, California State Prison Solano; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-16360.

D.C. No. CV-02-00051-FCD/DAD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 13, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Terry L. Slaughter, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U. S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Slaughter’s action without prejudice because Slaughter failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. *See McKinney v. Carey,*311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1200 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).

Slaughter’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WILLIAM D. SLONE,

(ALSO KNOWN AS WILLIAM D. SLOAN),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-5128

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 13-CV-0424, Judge Charles F. Lettow.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 The United States moves for leave to file an amended 

certificate of service and for an extension of time for the 

appellant to file a reply brief. 

Mr. Slone moves for relief of judgment. The United 

States moves for an extension of time to file a response to 

the motion for relief of judgment. Arguments concerning 

the merits of the case should be in the briefs. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

Case: 13-5128 Document: 25 Page: 1 Filed: 10/22/2013
2 SLONE v. US

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The United States’ motions for leave to file an 

amended certificate of service is granted. The motion for 

an extension of time for Mr. Slone to file a reply brief is 

moot. 

 (2) Mr. Slone’s motion for relief of judgment is denied

without prejudice. The United States’ motion for an 

extension of time to file a response is granted. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk 

s21

Case: 13-5128 Document: 25 Page: 2 Filed: 10/22/2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

STEVEN A. SWAN, )

)

)

v. ) Civil No. 1:06-cv-404-JAW

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant )

ORDER TO ANSWER

Steven A. Swan, a prisoner at the Federal Medical Center - Devens, in Ayer, Massachusetts,

filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. Insofar as it does

not plainly appear from the face of the Motion that Petitioner is not entitled to relief, Rule 4, Rules

Governing Section 2255 Cases, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Government shall respond to the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct, pursuant to

Rules 4 and 5, Rules Governing Motions to Vacate; and

2. The response shall be filed with the Court no later than April 16, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

Dated February 12, 2007.

/s/ Margaret J. Kravchuk

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00404-JAW Document 20 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 1
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 3, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1845

Lower Tribunal No. F15-12525

________________

Ivan Clark,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Ivan Clark, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
            Certification of Chief Financial Officer
    Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, C.W. Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
AMASYS Corporation;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior to the filing of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
(c)  Presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small
business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
(a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the small business
issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal controls.
6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in any other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


February 20, 2004                  /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                   C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-162-PB

Andre Warren

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

January 8, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to reschedule a change of plea hearing from

January 4, 2008, as he is being detained on other charges in

Mississippi and cannot be transported to New Hampshire until

approximately January 18, 2008. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 8, 2008 to February 5, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the 

Case 1:06-cr-00162-PB Document 21 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 2
2

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 3, 2008

cc: Jessica Brown, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00162-PB Document 21 Filed 01/03/08 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1169 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1169

 To amend title 39, United States Code, with respect to ``cooperative 
                              mailings''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2001

   Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Ehrlich, and Mr. Filner) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, with respect to ``cooperative 
                              mailings''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to clarify section 3626(j)(1)(D)(ii) of 
title 39, United States Code.

SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE MAILINGS.

    Section 3626(j) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(4)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 
rule or regulation of the Postal Service, but subject to subparagraph 
(C), in the case of mail matter sent (or proposed to be sent) by or on 
behalf of an authorized organization having a contractual or any other 
business relationship with an entity described in subparagraph (B)(ii), 
rates of postage under former section 4452(b) or 4452(c) of this title 
shall apply if those rates would apply in the case of identical mail 
matter sent by such organization absent such relationship.
    ``(B) For purposes of this paragraph--
            ``(i) the term `authorized organization' means an 
        organization authorized to mail at the rates for mail under 
        former section 4452(b) or 4452(c) of this title; and
            ``(ii) an entity described in this clause is any 
        organization or other person that is not an authorized 
        organization.
    ``(C) This paragraph does not authorize an entity described in 
subparagraph (B)(ii) to advertise, promote, offer, or, for a fee or 
consideration, recommend, describe, or announce the availability of, 
any of its products or services at the rates of postage under former 
section 4452(b) or 4452(c) of this title.''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that nothing in this Act should be 
considered to alter the authority of the United States Postal Service--
            (1) to apply regular rates of postage, rather than 
        nonprofit rates, to mail matter described in subparagraph (A), 
        (B), (C), or (D)(i) of section 3626(j)(1) of title 39, United 
        States Code; or
            (2) to enforce any criminal law within its jurisdiction.
                                 <all>
```
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0583

KAHANE THOMAS BEAVERS,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including June 24, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 16 2020

04/16/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0583
Exhibit
4.6


 


LZG
INTERNATIONAL, INC.


DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES


 


Authorized
Capital Stock


 


The
Company has 120,000,000 shares of authorized capital stock described as follows: The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares
of common stock with $.001 par value. The Company has authorized 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with $.001 par value to
be issued in five (5) series.


 


Common
Stock: The common stock has equal rights and privileges with respect to voting, liquidation and dividend rights. Each share of
common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. The holders are not permitted to
vote their shares cumulatively. Upon issuance of preferred stock, the common stock may have junior rights as compared to the preferred
stock. Stockholders of the Company have no preemptive rights to acquire additional shares of common stock or any other securities.
All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable.


 


Preferred
Stock: Our board of directors is authorized to establish the number of shares to be included in each series and the preferences,
rights of conversion, limitations and other relative rights of each series. As of the date of this filing, our board of directors
has not authorized a series, nor issued any preferred stock.


 


Other
Securities


 


As
of the date of this filing, we do not have any debt securities, warrants or options outstanding.


 


Voting
Rights


 


A
majority of the shares entitled to vote on the matter by each voting group, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute
a quorum at any meeting of shareholders, but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one third of the shares of each voting
group entitled to vote. The vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to
vote thereon is sufficient to authorize, affirm, ratify or consent to such act or action, except as otherwise provided by law.


 


Dividend
Policy


 


If
our Board of Directors declares dividends, all holders of our common stock are entitled to participate proportionally out of the
funds legally available therefrom. These dividends may be paid in cash, property or additional shares of common stock. We have
not paid any dividends since our inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development
of our business.


 


Transfer
Agent


 


Our
transfer agent is Standard Registrar & Stock Transfer Co., Inc. located in Salt Lake City, Utah.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1349 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1349

    To repeal the 50 percent limitation on courses offered through 
     telecommunications for student financial assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

 Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To repeal the 50 percent limitation on courses offered through 
     telecommunications for student financial assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Subsection (l) of section 484 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1091) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```