alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1763-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1763-DR), dated May 27, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 3, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the President's June 30, 2008, amended declaration authorizing Federal funds for emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance, at 90 percent Federal funding of total eligible costs under the Public Assistance Program, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service River Forecast Center has established that the rivers in the State of Iowa, which have experienced historical flooding, fell below flood stage on August 8, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs, 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-21668 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-76-01-PB

Daniel A. Espaillat

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the October 4, 2005

trial in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional

time to negotiate the terms of a potential diversion program

contract or otherwise prepare for trial. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from October 4, 2005 to January 6, 2006. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00076-PB Document 13 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The September 27, 2005 final pretrial conference is

continued until December 21, 2005 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 23, 2005

cc: Ray Raimo, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00076-PB Document 13 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 50 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) and Amendment No. 682 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
    consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
    individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  August 22, 2019
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Rudolph M. McBRIDE v. L. B. BAYNARD, Auditor of the State of Louisiana, et al.

No. 2582.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 15, 1943.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., and W. D. Goff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

L. H. Perez and Rudolph M. McBride, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

LE BLANC, Judge.

For the reasons this day handed down in the case of State of Louisiana ex rel. Nunez v. Baynard et al., La.App., 15 So.2d 649, it is ordered that the judgment 'appealed from in this case be and the same is hereby affirmed at the costs of the defendants, appellants herein.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

NH Department of Health and Human

Services Division of Children

Youth and Familie s

v . No. 06-fp-14 8

Elena Katz and Arnold Grodma n

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis (document

no . 3) is hereby granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the

filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-148-SM .

SO ORDERED .

James R . Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judg e

Date : April 26, 200 6

cc : Brian J .X . Murphy, Esq .

Elena Katz, pro se

Arnold Grodman, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00148-SM Document 6 Filed 04/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 175

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United

States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SHADEGG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under

the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enumerated Powers

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

7 FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW.

8 (a) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR THIS ACT.—

9 This Act is enacted pursuant to the power granted Con10 gress under article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United
2

•HR 175 IH

1 States Constitution and the power granted to each House

2 of Congress under article I, section 5, clause 2, of the

3 United States Constitution.

4 (b) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT RE5 QUIRED.—Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting after section 102 the following new

7 section:

8 ‘‘§ 102a. Constitutional authority clause

9 ‘‘Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and

10 definite statement of the constitutional authority relied

11 upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act. The

12 failure to comply with this section shall give rise to a point

13 of order in either House of Congress. The availability of

14 this point of order does not affect any other available re15 lief.’’

16 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

17 at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United States

18 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

19 section 102 the following new item:

‘‘102a. Constitutional authority clause.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

Dennis A . Smit h

v . Civil No. 05-cv-374-JD

NH State Prison, Warden, et al .

ORDER

Re : Document No . 35, Motion for Subpoena for Jane Coplan to

testify at a deposition and any hearing on injunctive relie f

Ruling : Granted . Plaintiff may be issued a subpoena for a

deposition but plaintiff must pay for the cost of service and for

the cost of a court reporter . Pro se plaintiffs, other than in

habeas cases, do not get either service free nor at defendant's

cost . Defendant has agreed to produce Warden Coplan at the

preliminary injunction hearing and will do so . Defendant is

advised that if they can not get Texas to permit plaintiff to

appear at that hearing by videoconferencing defendant will be

required to transport him here for the hearing . We may not have

jurisdiction over Texas prison authorities but we do have

jurisdiction over defendant and we are not going to have matters in

this court thwarted by Texas regulations .

/s/ James R . Muirhead

James R . Muirhead

U .S . Magistrate Judge

Date : September 8, 200 6

cc : Dennis Smith, pro se

Andrew Livernois, Esq .

Case 1:05-cv-00374-JD Document 42 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              738
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 18,852
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   18,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             8,852
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                         10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     18,852
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED, a Delaware ) 

corporation and VERISPAN, LLC, a Delaware ) 

limited liability company, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) Case No. 06-CV-280-PB 

vs. ) 

 ) 

KELLY A. AYOTTE, as Attorney General of ) 

the State of New Hampshire, ) 

 ) 

Defendant ) 

DEPOSITION DESIGNATION

 NOW COMES the State of New Hampshire (the “State”), by and through the Office of 

the Attorney General, and respectfully submits the following designation of depositions for trial 

in the above referenced matter in accordance with the Discovery Plan (Court document No. 34), 

and the Order approving the Discovery Plan. Each deposition designated in this Deposition 

Designation has been identified in the State’s Exhibit List, filed concurrently with this document. 

 The State designates the depositions (including both transcript and video) of the 

following witnesses: 

 1. Dr. Jerry Avorn 

 Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School 

 Chief, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics 

 Brigham and Women's Hospital 

 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030 

 Boston, MA 02120 

 (617) 278-0930 

 2. Dr. Aaron S. Kesselheim 

 Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics 

 Brigham and Women’s Hospital 

 1620 Tremont St., Suite 3030 

 Boston MA 02115 

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 74 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 3
 (617) 278-0930 

3. Dr. Gary A. Sobelson 

Concord Family Medicine 

141 East Side Drive 

Concord, NH. 03301 

(603) 225-3427 

 4. Dr. Marc Sadowsky 

 New England Neurological Associates 

 Medical Arts Building 

 168 Kinsley Street, Suite #1 

 Nashua, NH 03061 

 (603) 882-2114 

 

 5. Shahram Ahari 

 1524 Berkeley Way, Apt A 

 Berkeley, CA 94703 

 cell: (510) 684-8509 

 6. The Defendant reserves the right to designate testimony, by reference to deposition 

transcripts or portions of deposition video, of any witness listed by the Plaintiffs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

 Kelly A. Ayotte 

 Attorney General 

 

Date: 12/22/2006 /s/Richard W. Head 

 By: Richard W. Head (N.H. Bar No. 7900) 

 Senior Assistant Attorney General 

David A. Rienzo (N.H. Bar No. 13860) 

Assistant Attorney General 

Laura E. B. Lombardi (N.H. Bar No. 12821) 

Assistant Attorney General 

 33 Capitol Street 

 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 

 (603) 271-3643 

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 74 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 3
Certification of Service

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically and served 

electronically by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system or by mail on anyone unable to 

accept electronic filing. Jeffrey C. Spear, Esquire, James Bassett, Esquire, Patricia Acosta, 

Esquire and Thomas R. Julin, Esquire have appeared as counsel of record for plaintiffs IMS 

Health Incorporated and Verispan, LLC. 

 

 /s/Richard W. Head 

 By: Richard W. Head (N.H. Bar No. 7900) 

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 74 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 3 of 3
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1448

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by the

Government of American Samoa.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on

the Judiciary and Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

The Committee on Ways and Means discharged

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Rereferred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations

issued by the Government of American Samoa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1448 RCH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS

2 AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOV3 ERNMENT OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

4 (a) AUTHORITY TO ISSUE CERTAIN PRIVATE ACTIV5 ITY BONDS.—The Government of American Samoa may

6 cause to be issued qualified bonds (within the meaning of

7 section 141(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

8 (b) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME TAX9 ATION BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—The interest on any bond or

11 other obligation issued by or on behalf of the Gov12 ernment of American Samoa shall be exempt from

13 taxation by the Government of American Samoa and

14 the governments of any of the several States, the

15 District of Columbia, any territory or possession of

16 the United States, and any subdivision thereof.

17 (2) EXEMPTION APPLICABLE ONLY TO INCOME

18 TAXES.—The exemption provided by paragraph (1)

19 shall not apply to gift, estate, inheritance, legacy,

20 succession, or other wealth transfer taxes.

21 (c) CONFORMING REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVI22 SION.—Section 202 of Public Law 98–454 (48 U.S.C.

23 1670) is repealed.

24 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply to obli25 gations issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6536

ALAN C. DEBNAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-02-3424-20BH)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan C. Debnam, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alan C. Debnam seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal

was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

November 25, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on January 2,

2004.* Because Debnam failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
- 3 -

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-22-01-JD

David Couture

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

21) filed by defendant is granted. Trial is also continued as to

co-defendant Brandon Prewara unless an objection is filed on or

before June 27, 2007. 

Defendants shall file waivers of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for

the reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: June 25, 2007

cc: Jaye Rancourt, Esq.

Patrick Richard, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Robert Veiga, Esq.

Case 1:07-cr-00022-JD Document 22 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer
Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



This
Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January
16, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer
Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions
and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS
SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The
undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further
certify as follows:



| | 1. | I
have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1,
2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To
the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period,
and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit
Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/
    Connie Coffey                   |  | Dated:  March 4, 2022
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-42-01-SM

Thomas Lavery

O R D E R

Defendant Lavery’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 23). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2007

trial period. Defendant Lavery shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than December 29, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference/Change of Plea: February 27, 2007 at 

11:30 a.m.

Jury Selection: March 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 24 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 21, 2006

cc: Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 24 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 2