alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chart 1

Number, Size, and Volume of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1979-2002

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

1

2

3

4

5

Number of non-real-estate farm loans Millions, annual rate

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

10

20

30

40

50

Average size of non-real-estate farm loans Thousands of dollars

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

25

50

75

100

125

Volume of non-real-estate farm loans

3

Billions of dollars, annual rate
Chart 2

Maturity and Interest Rate of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1979-2002

 Note. Effective (compounded) annual interest rates are calculated from the stated rate and other

 terms of the loans and weighted by loan size.

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

4

8

12

16

Average maturity of non-real-estate farm loans 20

Months

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

4

8

12

16

Average effective interest rate on non-real-estate farm loans 20

Percent

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

0

25

50

75

100 Share of farm loans with a floating interest rate

4

Percent
| 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1995 (the “Basic Servicing Agreement”), between Financial Services Vehicle Trust (the “Trust”) and BMW                  Financial Services NA, LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), as supplemented by the 2018-1 Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 17, 2018 (together with the Basic Servicing Agreement, the “Servicing Agreement”), among                  the Trust, BMW Manufacturing L.P., as grantor and initial beneficiary of the Trust, and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as sponsor and as Servicer, and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the                  activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects during                  the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | March 18, 2020 |
|--------|----------------|

|   | BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                           |   |   |
|   |                           |   |   |
|   | By:                  | /s/ Stefan Kramer                                             |
|   |                           | Name:   | Stefan Kramer |
|   |                           | Title: | Vice President – Finance & CFO |
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: RICHARD W. NEILL, STEPHANIE 

MITCHKO, PETER CARAMANICA, 

CSC HOLDINGS, LLC,

Appellants

______________________ 

2015-1431

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 12/055,795.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROBERT KELSEY KRY, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JEFFREY A.

LAMKEN; GERALD MEYER, Chicago, IL; PAULINE 

PELLETIER, ROBERT EVAN SOKOHL, JON WRIGHT, Sterne 

Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC.

BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W.

KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM, LORE A. UNT. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, MAYER, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,024
<INVENTORY>                                      4,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,608
<PP&E>                                          69,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,755
<BONDS>                                        206,038
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393,469
<SALES>                                         24,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,195
<CGS>                                           15,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

I, Gene Feldman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Avenue Entertainment
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 16, 2006

                                            Gene Feldman
                                            President and Chief Executive and
                                            Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RAMEL WALTERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-989 

[June 17, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kirk C. Volker, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 50-1999-CF-001235-AXXXX-MB.

Ramel Walters, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1106

To exclude certain veterans’ compensation and pension amounts from consideration as adjusted income for purposes of determining the amount

of rent paid by a family for a dwelling unit assisted under the United

States Housing Act of 1937.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To exclude certain veterans’ compensation and pension

amounts from consideration as adjusted income for purposes of determining the amount of rent paid by a family

for a dwelling unit assisted under the United States

Housing Act of 1937.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Equity Act

5 of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1106 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME.

2 Notwithstanding section 3 of the United States

3 Housing Act of 1937, for purposes of determining the

4 amount of rent paid by a family for occupancy of a public

5 housing dwelling unit or a dwelling unit assisted under

6 section 8 of such Act, the adjusted income of a family shall

7 not be considered to include any amounts received by any

8 member of the family from the Secretary of Veterans Af9 fairs as—

10 (1) compensation, as defined in section 101(13)

11 of title 38, United States Code;

12 (2) dependency and indemnity compensation, as

13 defined in section 101(14) of such title; or

14 (3) pension, as defined in section 101(15) of

15 such title.

Æ
Exhibit 10.31

    

    

    THIS 2nd LOAN EXTENSION (the "Agreement") is made and entered into on November 8, 2018, to be considered effective as of July 31, 2018, between Stealth Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
      'Company"), and BHP Capital NY, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Holder").

    

    

    WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder agree to enter into this Agreement in order to extend the maturity of the Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note of $193,3000 face value note dated
      August 13, 2018 (the Note).

    

    

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to the following:

    

    

    Note Maturity Extension: The Holder and the Company agree to extend
      the Maturity of the Note until November 30, 2018. All other provisions of the Note will remain unchanged.

    

    

    The above Maturity Extension will be contingent on the following:

    

    

    
      	
              1.

            	
              Compensation: The Company will compensate BHP Capital NY, Inc. via wire transfer in the total amount of $8,000.

            


    

    

    

    
      	
              2.

            	
              Payment Date: Payment is received by the Holder the
                earlier of (i) 5pm EDT November 15h, 2018, or (ii) 5 calendar days from the filing of the Company's 2018 Q2 10-Q.

            


    

    

    

    Failure to Make Payment on Payment Date: Should the Company fail to
      make the Compensation payment identified above within the prescribed Payment Date, the Company will be given a 10 calendar day curing period to make such payment, provided the Company pays the Holder $3,000 by wire on or before the Payment Date
      above, as a payment extension fee.

    

    

    Further Assurances. Each party shall do and perform, or cause to be
      done and performed, the Note Maturity Extension.

    

    

    Effectiveness. This Agreement shall become effective immediately
      upon the full execution of this Agreement by the Company and the Holder and shall remain in effect provided full payment is received by the Payment Date above.

    

    

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

    

    

    	
            Stealth Technologies, Inc

          	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
            By:

          	 	 	
            By:

          	 
	
            Title:

          	 	 	
            Title:

          	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
            Date: October 30, 2018

          	 	 	
            Date: November 8, 2018
#### 9394, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Dean Kehler et al., Respondents.

[809 NYS2d 155]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for trespass, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered August 17, 2004, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the causes of action alleging trespass and nuisance.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties to this action are owners of adjacent waterfront properties on Long Island Sound. This action arises out of the defendants’ reconstruction of a dock and the plaintiffs’ allegation that the structure blocks the tidal flow on their waterfront, causing changes to the ecology.

The trial court correctly dismissed the plaintiffs’ cause of action alleging trespass. The trial court’s findings of fact, which the plaintiffs do not dispute, support its conclusion that the plaintiffs failed to establish their trespass claim *(see Phillips v Sun Oil Co.,*307 NY 328, 331 [1954]).

The trial court also correctly determined that the plaintiffs failed to establish their cause of action alleging nuisance based on negligence *(see Domen Holding Co. v Aranovich, 1*NY3d 117, 123-124 [2003]; *Copart Indus. v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.,*41 NY2d 564, 569 [1977]). The evidence at trial supports *772the determination that the defendants acted reasonably in light of the foreseeable consequences of their actions *(see Gordon v City of New York, 70*NY2d 839, 841 [1987]; *Danielenko v Kinney Rent A Car,*57 NY2d 198, 204 [1982]; *Novikova v Greenbriar Owners Corp.,*258 AD2d 149 [1999]).

The parties’ remaining contentions either need not be reached in light of our determination or are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11


                     LINENS 'N THINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    For the Thirteen Weeks Ended        For the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
                                     June 28,            June 29,       June 28,             June 29,
                                       1997                1996           1997                 1996
                                    ----------------------------        ------------------------------
                                             (Unaudited)                          (Unaudited)


<S>                               <C>                  <C>            <C>                 <C>             

FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

Weighted - average number of
   shares outstanding                     19,795             19,268          19,756               19,268
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============
Net income (loss) applicable
   to common shares                         $990              $(410)         $1,342              $(2,197)
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============

Per-share amounts
  Net income (loss) per share              $0.05             $(0.02)          $0.07               $(0.11)
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============

PRIMARY

Weighted - average number of
    shares outstanding                    19,795             19,268          19,756               19,268
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============
Net income (loss) applicable
    to common shares                        $990              $(410)         $1,342              $(2,197)
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============

Per-share amounts
  Net income (loss) per share              $0.05             $(0.02)          $0.07               $(0.11)
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============

FULLY DILUTED

Weighted - average number of
    shares outstanding and   
    fully diluted common share
    equivalents                           19,887             19,268          19,887               19,268
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============
Net income (loss) applicable
    to common shares                        $990              $(410)         $1,342              $(2,197)
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============

Per-share amounts
  Net income (loss) per share              $0.05             $(0.02)          $0.07               $(0.11)
                                  ===============      =============  ==============      ===============

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Bryan Bernard

a.k.a. Joseph Vaillancourt

v. Civil No. 06-cv-438-JD

New Hampshire Department of

Corrections, et al.

O R D E R

Before the Court is plaintiff’s Petition for Injunction

(document no. 250) filed in the above-captioned case. The

petition seeks an injunction against defendants raising issues

related to the practice of his faith as a Nazarite. Plaintiff

bases his request for injunctive relief on allegations that he

has been harassed, disciplined, and prevented from practicing his

religion in violation of his First Amendment rights. Plaintiff’s

claims concern First Amendment issues not related to the claims

in his underlying lawsuit. These claims cannot be introduced in

this manner. Instead, if plaintiff wishes to seek relief for a

violation of his constitutional rights that he has not previously

raised, he must file a new action in this court by separate

complaint. Accordingly, the petition for injunction is denied.

Case 1:06-cv-00438-JD Document 252 Filed 10/05/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Bernard has filed, along with his petition, a $100 bond, as

he has been previously directed to do in this matter when filing

a petition. The Clerk’s office is directed to refund the bond to

Bernard, as the petition filed is not facially frivolous, it is

simply not appropriately filed in the instant case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 5, 2007

cc: Bryan Bernard, a.k.a. Joseph Vaillancourt, pro se

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00438-JD Document 252 Filed 10/05/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-97-1-3-4-6-SM

Edward Cervantes Arias,

Leslie B. Smith, Allen R. Hall,

and Terri Hodgkin

O R D E R

Defendants Terri Hodgkin and Leslie Smith have filed motions to continue

the final pretrial conference and trial (documents no. 87 and 88). Both motion

are granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2008 trial period. 

Defendants Hodgkin and Smith shall file a waivers of speedy trial rights not

later than December 24, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, their continuances

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: February 22, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 89 Filed 12/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: March 4, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 17, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Jose A. Espinosa, Esq.

Michael Sheehan, Esq.

Clyde R.W.Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 89 Filed 12/17/07 Page 2 of 2