alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Paul Berry

v. Civil No. 07-cv-178-PB

Larry Blaisdell, Warden, 

Northern NH Correctional Facility

O R D E R

Petitioner’s objection is based on a misreading of section 2244(d)(1)(A). His conviction

became final when the time for seeking certiorari review of the state supreme court’s ruling

expired. More than a year passed after the conviction became final before the next state court

proceeding was commenced. Thus, the AEDPA statute of limitations expired before the first

post conviction filing was made. No other exception applied. Report and Recommendation

approved.

SO ORDERED.

December 19, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Paul Berry, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00178-JL Document 14 Filed 12/19/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:07-cv-00178-JL Document 14 Filed 12/19/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,352,410
<SECURITIES>                                 4,504,565
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,982,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                   826,687
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,076,420
<PP&E>                                       4,155,487
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,014,972)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,353,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,559,768
<BONDS>                                         50,169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,561
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,299,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,353,204
<SALES>                                      6,340,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,001,001
<CGS>                                        2,533,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,621,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,014,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (18,634,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (18,139,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (18,139,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.44)
        


</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 12-1085 DAVID HANNINGTON, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on March 29, 2013, is amended as follows: On the coversheet below "Gisele M. Nadeau for Appellee." insert "John S. Koppel, with whom Michael Jay Singer, Stuart F. Delery, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Will A. Gunn, Gen e ral Counsel, Richard J. Hipolit, Assistant General Counsel, and Joshua P. Mayer, Attorney, Department of Veterans Affairs, were on brief, for Amicus Cur i a e United States of America.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Francis Ndemi Mwangi

Case No . 07-cr-133-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Mwangi's motion to continue the final pretrial conference an d

trial is granted (document 19) . Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2008

trial period. Defendant Mwangi shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than February 4, 2008 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : April 25, 2008 at 3 :30 p .m.

Jury Selection : May 6, 2008 at 9 :30 a .m.

Case 1:07-cr-00133-SM Document 20 Filed 01/22/08 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

January 22, 2008

cc : Paul Garrity, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:07-cr-00133-SM Document 20 Filed 01/22/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) Civil No. 07-CV-185-JM

 )

Seven Thousand Five Hundred Six Dollars ) 

($7,506.00) in U.S. Currency, more or less, )

seized from Richard Bradley, )

)

 Defendant-in-rem. )

________________________________________________)

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

On June 18, 2007, the United States filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem,

seeking the forfeiture of the defendant in rem Seven Thousand Five Hundred Six Dollars

($7,506.00) in U.S. Currency, more or less, seized from Richard Bradley, based upon alleged

violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 881(a)(6). This Verified Complaint and the Notice of Complaint were

served on all known potential claimants, including Richard Bradley, who was served on

June 28, 2007, through his attorney Theodore Barnes, Esq. There are no other known claimants.

The United States and Claimant Richard Bradley have reached a stipulated settlement

agreement which provides for the forfeiture of a portion of the defendant in rem, and a return of a

portion of the defendant in rem to Richard Bradley.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

A. That all rights, title and interests to the forfeiture of $4,206.00 of the defendant in

rem $7,506.00 in U.S. Currency, more or less, seized from Richard Bradley, from which amount

the United States Marshal’s Service (USMS) shall deduct its costs related to this proceeding, are

Case 1:07-cv-00185-JM Document 17 Filed 09/05/07 Page 1 of 2
2

hereby condemned, forfeited and vested in the United States of America pursuant to

21 U.S.C.§ 881(a)(6), free from the claims of any other party. These funds shall be disposed of

by the USMS in accordance with the applicable law and regulations. These funds, less costs to

the USMS associated with the defendant in rem, shall be deposited into the Department of

Justice Asset Forfeiture Fund in accordance with Title 28, United States Code, Section 524( c)

and Title 21, United States Code, Section 881(e);

B. That the remaining $3,300.00 in U.S. Currency of the defendant in rem $7,506.00 in

U.S. Currency, more or less, seized from Richard Bradley, is hereby dismissed from the case;

C. That Richard Bradley shall bear his own costs of this proceeding, including

attorney's fees, if any.

The Clerk is hereby directed to send two certified copies of this Order to the USMS and

two certified copies to United States Attorney's Office, Attention: Assistant U.S. Attorney Seth

R. Aframe.

 

Dated: ___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 September 5, 2007 

 /s/ James R. Muirhead

Case 1:07-cv-00185-JM Document 17 Filed 09/05/07 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,973] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 3, 2008, in response to a petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of Steelcase, Inc., Global Headquarters, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of September 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E8-22405 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-66-PB

Joseph Amegah

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the June 6, 2006 trial

in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete discovery and prepare a defense. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, to allow the parties time to complete discovery

and properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial

from June 6, 2006 to September 6, 2006. In agreeing to continue

the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00066-PB Document 8 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 25, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

until August 28, 2006 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 26, 2006

cc: Sven Wiberg, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00066-PB Document 8 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert V. Towle

v.

NH Department of Human Services,

Director, et al.

No. 07-fp-065

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $22.00 is due no later than April

11, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-065-SM.

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 9, 2007

United States Magistrate Judge

ame"RMuirhead

cc: Robert V. Towle, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00065-SM Document 4 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-199-01-SM

Edwin Adames

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 11) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than January 3, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00199-SM Document 12 Filed 12/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: February 21, 2007 at 4:00 PM 

Jury Selection: March 4, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

December 17, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

 Jessica Brown, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00199-SM Document 12 Filed 12/17/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.6


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT
TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of September 10, 2019, by
and between Network Medical Management, Inc., a California corporation (“Manager”), and AP-AMH Medical Corporation,
a California professional medical corporation ("AP-AMH").


 


A.           Manager
and AP-AMH have previously entered into that certain Administrative Services Agreement dated as of May 10, 2019 (the “Agreement”).


 


B.           Manager
and AP-AMH desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements, representations, warranties, provisions and covenants herein contained,
the parties hereto, each intending to be bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.     
     Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the
meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.


 


2.      
    Section 2.1. The following is hereby added at the end of Section 2.1 of the Agreement:


 


“To the extent
that AP-AMH is unable to pay any Administrative Fee when due hereunder because it has received Series A Dividends in an
amount insufficient (or because it has not received any Series A Dividends) to pay in full such Administrative Fee, such
unpaid Administrative Fee(s) shall accrue and be paid upon receipt by AP-AMH of sufficient funds.”


 


3.     
     Schedule 1. Schedule 1 to the Agreement (Administrative Fee Percentage) is hereby
amended and restated in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit A to this Amendment.


 


4.    
      Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the
terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


[Signatures appear on the following page.]


 




    - 1 -


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been executed as of the date first above written.


 


	“Manager”	 	“AP-AMH”
	 	 	 
	NETWORK MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC.	 	AP-AMH MEDICAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Eric Chin	 	By: 	/s/ Thomas Lam
	 	Eric Chin	 	 	Thomas S. Lam, M.D.,
	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 	Chief Executive Officer


 


Signature Page to


FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
AGREEMENT
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1560 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1560

  To increase the numerical limitation on the number of asylees whose 
   status may be adjusted to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
                          permanent residence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2001

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To increase the numerical limitation on the number of asylees whose 
   status may be adjusted to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
                          permanent residence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increase in Numerical Limitation for 
Asylees Adjustment Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN NUMERICAL LIMITATION ON ASYLEE ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 209(b) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1159(b)) is amended by striking ``10,000'' and inserting 
``25,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2001.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-49-01-SM

Lena Bagaya

O R D E R

Defendant’s assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 7) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the October trial period. Defendant Bagaya shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than July 5, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00049-SM Document 8 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: September 26, 2005 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection: October 4, 2005 at 9:30 AM 

SO ORDERED.

June 27, 2005 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Alfred Rubega, Esq.

Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

U. S. Probaton

U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00049-SM Document 8 Filed 06/27/05 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Al Sevester CONERLY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-20036.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2003.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Court-appointed counsel for A1 Sevester Conerly has moved for leave to withdraw *378from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Conerly has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Elaine L. Chao, Secretary

of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor

v. Civil No. 06-cv-146-PB

Fine Line Drywall, Inc., et al.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 21, 2006, plaintiff appeared for a damages

hearing. The defaulted defendants did not appear. Brendon

Reardon, a senior investigator for plaintiff, testified that he

had examined the defendants payroll records and found that the

January 2004 payroll withholdings from employees of defendant for

“pension” benefits were remitted late and that those withholdings

for the months of February through December 2004 were never paid

into the plan. The plan is owed $29,834.95 as well as $2,664.22

in pre-judgment interest to November 21, 2006.

I recommend that the judgment be entered for plaintiff in

the sum of $29,834.95 plus pre-judgment interest of $2,664.22.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Case 1:06-cv-00146-PB Document 11 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United

States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

November 26, 2006

cc: Gail E. Glick, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00146-PB Document 11 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-201-PB

Ruben Ortiz-Perez

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

February 5, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize discovery and engage in plea

negotiations prior to trial. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from February 5, 2008 to May 6, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:07-cr-00201-PB Document 13 Filed 01/18/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The January 30, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 22, 2008 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 18, 2008

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00201-PB Document 13 Filed 01/18/08 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00090-JD Document 19 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00090-JD Document 19 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 2