alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-777-002]


Westar Energy, Inc.; Notice of Filing

September 17, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 12, 2008, Westar Energy, Inc. 
(Westar), and Kansas Gas and Electric Company hereby submit for filing 
revised tariff sheets to Attachment H-1 of Westar's Open Access 
Transmission Tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6b0b3a4b5b9989a9f9893a5838686998482b690938495d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99dfdccbdad6f7f5f0f7fccaece9e9f6ebedd9fffcebfab7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 pm Eastern Time on October 3, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22283 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Leon J. Riel

v. Civil No. 06-cv-159-JM

Town of Salisbury

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41.1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with 

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

January 3, 2007 /s/James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Robert H. Miller, Esq.

Kenneth J. Barnes, Esq.

Russell F. Hilliard, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00159-JM Document 11 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 1
#### Allen R. TURK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. S.C. KIRSHNER, Sergeant; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-15223.

D.C. No. CV-00-00160-LKK(JFM).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 18, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*749MEMORANDUM**

California state prisoner Allen R. Turk appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for filing a civil rights complaint by twice attempting to crush him with electric prison doors. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Clicks Billiards, Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc.,*251 F.3d 1252, 1257 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district cotut properly granted summary judgment on Turk’s retaliation claim because his evidence did not create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Turk’s exercise of his First Amendment rights was the substantial motivating factor behind Officer Munroe’s decision to close the prison doors. *See Pratt v. Rowland,*65 F.3d 802, 808 (9th Cir.1995).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Turk’s excessive force claim because the evidence Turk submitted was insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact whether the decision to close the prison doors was undertaken with a malicious or sadistic motive. *See Jeffers v. Gomez,*267 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam) (citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard A. Post, President and Chief Executive Officer of Autobytel Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Autobytel Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 31, 2005



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD A. POST                                
|Richard A. Post, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-04-1996             AUG-04-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-04-1996             AUG-05-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-02-1997             FEB-02-1997
<CASH>                                           2,279                   2,279
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,653                  16,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                       879                     879
<INVENTORY>                                        843                     843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,025                  23,025
<PP&E>                                         105,493                 105,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,214                  24,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,967                 109,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,540                  21,540
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        15,010                  15,010
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,693                   6,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,967                 109,967
<SALES>                                         19,078                  38,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,078                  38,025
<CGS>                                           12,436                  24,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,436                  24,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,839                  11,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,198                   2,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (395)                   (271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (395)                   (271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (395)                   (271)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)                   (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)                   (.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1



          Computation of Historical Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                                 October 31,                    October 31,
                                                            1996            1997           1996           1997
                                                        ------------    ------------   ------------   ------------
<S> <C>
          Net income (loss)                             $    215,825    $(2,631,382)   $   418,171   $(2,584,941)
                                                        ============    ===========    ===========   ===========

          Weighted average number of shares
          outstanding                                      4,000,000      7,412,089      4,000,000     7,365,984
          Add:
              Shares issuable upon conversion of
                Series A Redeemable Convertible
                Preferred Stock                              992,061             --        992,061            --
              Shares issuable from the assumed
                exercise of options as determined
                by the application of the treasury
                stock method                                 611,144             --        611,144            --
                                                        ------------    -----------    -----------   -----------
                                                           5,603,205      7,412,089      5,603,205     7,365,984
                                                        ============    ===========    ===========   ===========
          Net income (loss) per common share            $       0.04    $     (0.36)   $      0.07   $     (0.35)
                                                        ============    ===========    ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


The above computations include all common equivalent shares issued within the 12
months preceding the filing date as if they were outstanding for all periods
presented (using the treasury stock method) and the as if converted method with
regards to the Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock.

For the three and six months ended October 31, 1997, there are no shares
issuable from the assumed exercise of options, since they would be
anti-dilutive.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,713] 

                    On September 11, 2008, the Department of Labor (Department) received a request for administrative reconsideration of the Department's Notice of negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The negative determination was issued on July 28, 2008. The Department's Notice of determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 12, 2008 (73 FR 46924). Workers produce printed materials including postcards, calendars, and journals.                 

The negative determination was based on the Department's findings that the subject firm did not import printed materials or shift production of those articles to a foreign country during the relevant period. The Department's survey of the subject firm's major declining customer revealed no increased imports of postcards, calendars and journals during the relevant period. 

In the request for reconsideration, the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union, Local 503-M (Union) stated that the “import of foreign printed products put a severe economic strain on Canterbury Press, which forced the company to close.” 

The Department has carefully reviewed the Union's request for reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of September 2008. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E8-22403 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CITY OF PITTSBURGH,

Petitioner

v.

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FORT

PITT LODGE NO.1,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 34 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27 th day of November , 2023, the Application for Stay is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 99(b)



                              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ABC Family Worldwide,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
O.  Staggs,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Thomas O. Staggs
Thomas O. Staggs
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Farrell GONZALEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50677.

D.C. No. CR-01-02513-IEG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*342Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.*

Decided March 12, 2003.

Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Farrell Gonzalez appeals his conviction by guilty plea to one count of importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960.

Gonzalez’s contention that Sections 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 573, 154 L.Ed.2d 459 (2002) (Section 960), and *United States v. Varela-Rivera,*279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (Section 952). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it did not allege *mens rea*as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634 (9th Cir.2002). His contention that *United States v. Harris,*536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), overrules *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.) (en banc), *cert. denied,*535 U.S. 1105, 122 S.Ct. 2314, 152 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2002), and *Mendoza-Paz*is foreclosed by *United States v. Hernandez,*322 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2003).***

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

***

 The government’s motion to strike appellee's Rule 28(¡) letter of additional citations is denied, and the clerk shall file the letter.
3.12 U.S. RESERVE ASSETS

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2001 2002 2003

2004 2005

Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Mayp

1 Total ................................. 68,654 79,006 85,938 84,232 86,702 86,824 81,366 80,168 78,942 79,526 77,743

2 Gold stock1 ............................ 11,045 11,043 11,043 11,043 11,043 11,045 11,042 11,042 11,041 11,041 11,041

3 Special drawing rights2,3 ................. 10,774 12,166 12,638 13,041 13,478 13,582 13,342 11,727 11,564 11,610 11,385

4 Reserve position in International Monetary Fund2 ............................ 17,854 21,979 22,535 19,530 20,079 19,479 15,247 15,336 15,276 15,422 15,406

5 Foreign currencies4 ..................... 28,981 33,818 39,722 40,618 42,102 42,718 41,735 42,063 41,061 41,452 39,910

Note. The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at: www. federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF have also been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 2001 2002 2003

2004 2005

Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Mayp

1 Deposits .............................. 61 136 162 91 88 80 121 86 139 126 105

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 592,630 678,106 845,080 1,028,945 1,044,531 1,041,215 1,039,348 1,058,929 1,062,861 1,057,109 1,065,032

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 9,099 9,045 8,971 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967 8,967

Note. The data presented in this table are available in the monthly statistical release ‘‘U.S.

Reserve Assets; Foreign Official Assets Held at Federal Reserve Banks,’’ on the Board’s

website at: www. federalreserve.gov/releases.

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.