alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 175 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 175

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
 States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Shadegg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
 States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enumerated Powers Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW.

    (a) Constitutional Authority for This Act.--This Act is enacted 
pursuant to the power granted Congress under article I, section 8, 
clause 18, of the United States Constitution and the power granted to 
each House of Congress under article I, section 5, clause 2, of the 
United States Constitution.
    (b) Constitutional Authority Statement Required.--Chapter 2 of 
title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 102 
the following new section:
``Sec. 102a. Constitutional authority clause
    ``Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and definite 
statement of the constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment 
of each portion of that Act. The failure to comply with this section 
shall give rise to a point of order in either House of Congress. The 
availability of this point of order does not affect any other available 
relief.''
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 102 the following new item:

``102a. Constitutional authority clause.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

MMC MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., 

a Nebraska corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TURTLE CREEK CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a 

Nebraska limited liability company; and MIDCONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, an 

Oklahoma insurance corporation,

Defendants.

8:23CV236

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, signed 

by counsel for each party. Filing 33. The parties stipulate to the dismissal of the parties’ claim and 

defenses in this case with prejudice and with no award of fees or costs to any party. Filing 33 at 1. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, Filing 33, is 

granted, and this case and each party’s claim and defenses in it are dismissed with prejudice, with 

each party to bear its own fees and costs.

Dated this 13th day of June, 2024.

BY THE COURT:  

_________________________

Brian C. Buescher 

United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00236-BCB-MDN Doc # 34 Filed: 06/13/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 132
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 150 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 150

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain 
 disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                device.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Petri (for himself, Mr. Shays, and Ms. Slaughter) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require certain 
 disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                device.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO POLLING BY TELEPHONE OR 
              ELECTRONIC DEVICE.

    Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                 device

    ``Sec. 323. (a) Any person who conducts a Federal election poll by 
telephone or electronic device shall disclose to each respondent the 
identity of the person paying the expenses of the poll. The disclosure 
shall be made at the end of the interview involved.
    ``(b) In the case of any Federal election poll by telephone or 
electronic device--
            ``(1) if the results are not to be made public, the person 
        who conducts the poll shall report to the Commission the total 
        cost of the poll and all sources of funds for the poll; and
            ``(2) the person who conducts the poll shall report to the 
        Commission the total number of households contacted and include 
        with such report a copy of the poll questions.
    ``(c) As used in this section, the term `Federal election poll' 
means a survey--
            ``(1) in which the respondent is asked to state a 
        preference in a future election for Federal office; and
            ``(2) in which more than 1,200 households are surveyed.''.
                                 <all>
```
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1539

For the relief of Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GHASSAN

4 MOHAMAD RAJEH.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh shall be eligible for

8 issuance of an immigrant visa of for adjustment of status

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment

12 of status to lawful permanent resident.
2

HR 1539 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Ghassan

2 Mohamad Rajeh enters the United States before the filing

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

7 the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa of permanent res15 idence to Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh, the Secretary of State

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

23 202(e) of such Act.

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
3

HR 1539 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act.

Æ
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 2022


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: April 11, 2023
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09

- 19

- 00102

- CV

__________________

DARREN CEASAR, Appellant

V.

904 HOTEL OPERATING LLC D/B/A MCM ELEGANTE HOTEL,

Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 136th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D

- 200,813

- A

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In Febru ary 2021, Darren Ceasar and 904 Hotel Operating LLC d/b/a MCM

Elegante Hotel

, who are the parties to the appeal, filed a joint motion in which the y

ask this Court to dismiss the appeal. The parties filed the joint motion before the

Court issued an opinion. The motion complies with the requirements in Rule 42.1 of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which allows the appellate court t o dismiss2 the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. Because there are no other parties to the appeal,

we grant the joint motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 25, 2021

Opinion Delivered March 18, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1432

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Major Lyn

McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. BISHOP (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. DEAL

of Georgia, Mr. NORWOOD, and Mr. COLLINS) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MAJOR LYN McINTOSH POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING.

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

6 Postal Service located at 3698 Inner Perimeter Road in

7 Valdosta, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the

8 ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1432 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Major Lyn McIntosh

5 Post Office Building.

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1741

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial operation

of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply with stage

3 noise levels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the

commercial operation of supersonic transport category

aircraft that do not comply with stage 3 noise levels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF SUPERSONIC

4 TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT.

5 Beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of this

6 Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall prohibit the

7 commercial operation of a civil supersonic transport cat8 egory aircraft to or from an airport in the United States
2

•HR 1741 IH

1 unless the Secretary finds that the aircraft complies with

2 stage 3 noise levels.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-382-JD

Concertra Integrated

Services, Inc.

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-383-SM

Nsight Technologies, LLC

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-384-JD

B&H Foto & Electronics,

Corp., et al.

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-385-PB

Physicians Specialty Hospital

of El Paso East, L.P.

Olga L. Bogdanov,

Chapter 7 Trustee

v. Civil No. 06-cv-386-SM

Christus Health Corp.

O R D E R

On October 24, 2006, the court issued an order in which it

proposed consolidating four other related cases into Civil No.

06-cv-384-JD: Bogdanov v. Concentra Integrated Services, Inc.,

Case 1:06-cv-00384-JD Document 5 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
2

06-cv-382-JD; Bogdanov v. Nsight Technologies, LLC, 06-cv-383-SM;

Bogdanov v. Physicians Specialty Hospital of El Paso East, L.P.,

06-cv-385-PB; and Bogdanov v. Christus Health Corporation, 06-cv386-SM. Olga L. Bogdanov, the Chapter 7 Trustee, filed a notice

in each case consenting to consolidation. None of the defendants

responded.

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the court’s order of

October 24, the four cases cited above are consolidated into

Bogdanov v. B&H Foto & Electronics, Corp., 06-cv-284-JD, solely

for the purpose of addressing the motions to withdraw the

reference from the bankruptcy court.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

November 14, 2006

cc: Geraldine L. Karonis, Esquire

Olga L. Bogdanov, pro se

Concentra Integrated Services, Inc.

Nsight Technologies, LLC

B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.

Physicians Specialty Hospital of El Paso East, L.P.

Christus Health Corp.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00384-JD Document 5 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United  States  Code,  as adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
Manchester Technologies, Inc. ("Manchester"),  that, to his knowledge, Amendment
No. 1 to the Quarterly  Report of Manchester on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
October 31, 2004,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and that the  information  contained  in such
report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operation of Manchester. This written statement is being furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed
original of this  statement has been provided to Manchester and will be retained
by Manchester  and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:   July 5, 2005       /S/ Barry R. Steinberg
                               ----------------------------
                               Barry R. Steinberg
                               Chief Executive Officer


Date:   July 5, 2005       /S/  Elan Yaish
                                -------------------------------------------
                               Elan Yaish
                               Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer
                               and Principal Accounting Officer
Case 1:07-cv-00131-JL   Document 53   Filed 10/27/08   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32(a)

TXU CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, C. John Wilder, Chairman, President and CEO of TXU Corp. (the Company),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 9th day of November, 2006.



/s/ C. John WilderName:

C. John WilderTitle:

Chairman, President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Corp. and
will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2493
EDWARD G. TINSLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRW, INCORPORATED; EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA96-273-PJM) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward G. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Sandy David Baron, GOLDSTEIN & BARON, CHARTERED, College Park, Maryland; Thomas Moss Wood, IV, Nathan Daniel Adler, NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his action filed under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1681 (West 1982 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. TRW, Inc. , No. CA-96-273-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Aleksander Keylikhes, Respondent, v Elena Kiejliches, Also Known as Helena Kiejliches, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 573]

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (McElrath, J.), dated March 10, 2004, as denied her supplemental petitions, inter alia, for visitation with her children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in making determinations concerning matters such as visitation, and such determinations should not be disturbed unless they lack a sound basis in the record *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 174 [1982]; *Matter of Rho v Rho,*19 AD3d 605 [2005]). Contrary to the mother’s contention, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the Family Court’s determination, inter aha, that visitation was not in the children’s best interests *(see Matter of Taylor v Lumba,*309 AD2d 941, 942 [2003]; *Matter of Wissink v*Wis*sink,*301 AD2d 36, 39 [2002]; *Matter of Castellano v England,*275 AD2d 412, 413 [2000]; *Young v Young,*212 AD2d 114, 118 [1995]). H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
1For example: The states of Florida, New Jersey and Vermont

and numerous Florida and Vermont individuals and entities. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dana Moss

v. Civil No. 05-cv-022-PB

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, et al.

O R D E R

 Plaintiff has moved to amend her complaint to include

twenty-seven new parties. Document no. 8. It is apparent that a

number of these parties neither do business in New Hampshire nor

have they committed any tort here.1 Plaintiff is unlikely to be

able to demonstrate that this court has personal jurisdiction

over them. Plaintiff has not complied with the service

requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, Local Rules 15.1(a)(ii) and

(iii), 15.1(b), 7.1(a)(2) and has not even signed the motion. 

The motion to amend (document no. 8) is denied for failure

to comply with a multitude of federal and local rules. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 23, 2005

Case 1:05-cv-00022-PB Document 18 Filed 06/23/05 Page 1 of 2
2

cc: Dana Moss, pro se

 W. Kirk Abbott, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00022-PB Document 18 Filed 06/23/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-25-1998
<CASH>                                         395,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,647,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                    61,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,073,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,388,572
<PP&E>                                       3,766,892
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,538,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,501,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,359,051
<BONDS>                                      7,215,940
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,880,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,501,267
<SALES>                                     30,270,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,270,094
<CGS>                                       19,327,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,743,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             244,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                282,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   282,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>