alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), we, Jeffrey H. Coats, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Curtis E. DeWalt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jeffrey H. CoatsJeffrey H. CoatsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerApril 24, 2009/s/ Curtis E. DeWaltCurtis E. DeWaltSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerApril 24, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-66-01-PB

Jonathan Welch

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 1, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and address pending state

charges against him. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 1, 2007 to August 21, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00066-PB Document 14 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 20, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to

July 24, 2007 at 3:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 20, 2007

cc: Ray Raimo, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00066-PB Document 14 Filed 04/20/07 Page 2 of 2
AMENDMENT
#1 TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED ON MAY 18, 2018


 


T
HIS AMENDMENT # 1 TOTHE CONVERTIBLE
PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED ON MAY 18, 2018 (the


--Amendment"
) is made effective as of July
30, 2019, by and between Regen Biopharma , Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the


··Company")
, and Auctus Fund, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the " Holder'') (collectively the " Parties' ").


 


BACKGROUND


 


A.    
The Company
and Holder are the parties to that certain convertible promissory note originally issued
by the Company to the Holder on May 18.
20 I 8, in the original principal amount of $114,000.00 (as amended form time
to time, the "Note" ): and


 


B.    
The Company
and the Holder desire to consummate a second tranche of $9,971 .00 under the
Note to be added to the Note on or around July 30.2019.


 


C.   
The Company and Holder acknowledge and agree
that the Note is currently outstanding
in the amount of the Default Sum (as defined in the Note) .


 


 D. The Parties desire to amend the Note as set forth expressly below.




 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration. the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


I
..       The principal balance of the Note shall be increased by $9,97 1.00 to reflect the addition
of a second tranche of $9,97 l.00 under the Note, which
the Holder will fund in cash to the Company on or around the date
hereof.


 


2.       This
Amendment shall
be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and
supersede any provisions to the
contrary contained in the Note. Except as specifically
modified hereby all of the provisions of the Note which are not in conflict
with the terms of this Amendment,
shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 





	REGEN BIOPHARMA, INC.	 	Auctus Fund, LLC
	 	 	 
	By: /s/ David Koos	 	By: /s/ Lou Posner
	Name: David Koos	 	Name: Lou Posner
	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 	Title: Managing Director
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1366

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

located at 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in SantaAna, California, as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez PostOffice Building’’.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1366

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1366 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HECTOR G. GODINEZ POST

2 OFFICE BUILDING.

3 The United States Post Office building located at

4 3101 West Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California,

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

6 Post Office Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

10 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hector G. Godinez

12 Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2001: Q3... 7.7 7.8 7.5 8.1 8.2 6.9 8.9 8.5 8.0 7.1  Q4... 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.8 7.4 5.3 7.9 7.4 6.8 5.5 2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7  Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6  Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9  Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2  Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6  Q4... 5.0 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.6 4.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 4.2 2004: Q1... 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.0  Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Q3... 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.0 6.6 6.5 5.9 5.1  Q4... 5.5 5.5 5.2 6.0 5.5 4.9 6.9 6.5 6.3 5.1 2005: Q1... 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.9 6.9 5.7 7.3 6.9 6.9 6.4  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Toan K . Nguyen

Case No . 07-cr-51-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Nguyen's motion to continue the final pretrial conference an d

trial is granted (document 17) . Trial has been rescheduled for the January

2008 trial period. Defendant Nguyen shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than November 13, 2007 . On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : December 19, 2007 at 4 :00 p .m.

Jury Selection : January 8, 2008 at 9 :30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00051-SM Document 19 Filed 11/01/07 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

November 1, 2007

cc : Richard Monteith, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

2

Case 1:07-cr-00051-SM Document 19 Filed 11/01/07 Page 2 of 2
212 La. 139

#### BROWNING v. WEBSTER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 38592.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1947.

James E. Bolin, of Springhill, for plaintiff-appellant.

A. M. Wallace, Dist. Atty., of Benton, and R. H. Drew, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Minden, for defendant-appellee.

McCALEB, Justice.

At a special election held in Springhill School District No. 8 on February 11, 1947 pursuant to a call of Webster Parish School Board, the qualified taxpaying electors of the District approved a proposal for the issuance of fifteen year bonds amounting to $268,000, for the purpose of purchasing sites and erecting, furnishing and equipping the buildings of the School District. The School Board met on the following day and proceeded to promulgate the election returns, passed an ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of the bonds authorized thereunder and levied a special tax on the property within the limits of the School District to pay the principal and interest of the bonds as they matured. All of these proceedings were published in the Minden Herald newspaper, the official journal of Webster Parish School Board, on February 21, 1947.

Claiming that the special election was. illegal for the reason that notice thereof was not given in a newspaper published within the confines of Springhill School District No. 8 as provided by Section 5 of Act No. 46 of the Extra Session of 1921, plaintiff filed the instant suit on April 25, 1947 to have the election and all proceedings had in connection therewith declared a nullity.

The Webster Parish School Board interposed, among other defenses, exceptions of no right or cause of action and prescription. These exceptions were maintained by the District Judge and the suit dismissed. Plaintiff has appealed.

The plea of prescription, which is founded on the provisions of Section 14(n) of Article XIV of the Constitution and Section 43 of Act No. 46 of the Extra Session of 1921, was properly sustained as plaintiffs suit was filed more than 60 days from the date of promulgation of the result of the election. The substance of the above-*622cited constitutional and statutory provisions is that suits contesting an election of this sort must he brought within 60 days from the date of promulgation of the result; otherwise the validity of the election, the authority to issue the bonds and the legality of all other proceedings incidental thereto shall be conclusively presumed and “no court shall have authority to inquire into such matters”.

It would be inutile to cite the long list of cases upholding similar pleas of prescription. Suffice it to direct attention to our recent opinions in Gough v. La Salle Parish School Board, 210 La. 554, 27 So.2d 330 and Sansing v. Rapides Parish School Board, La.Sup., 31 So.2d 169, wherein reference is made to a host of prior adjudications.

The judgment is affirmed.
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1991...... 9.8 10.2 11.0 10.4 11.3 8.6 11.5 11.2 10.7 9.2 1992...... 7.8 8.2 8.6 8.8 9.3 6.3 9.7 9.3 8.8 7.1 1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 1999: Q4... 9.2 9.3 9.2 9.4 9.4 8.6 9.9 9.7 9.4 8.8 2000: Q1... 9.2 9.2 9.3 9.5 8.0 9.2 9.8 9.7 9.5 9.0  Q2... 9.7 9.6 9.9 9.9 10.1 9.2 10.3 10.1 10.0 9.4  Q3... 10.2 10.4 10.2 10.3 10.1 9.6 10.7 10.7 10.4 9.8  Q4... 10.0 10.0 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.4 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.7 2001: Q1... 9.1 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.2 8.3 10.1 9.8 9.6 8.7  Q2... 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.1 7.8 9.2 8.9 8.6 7.9  Q3... 7.7 7.8 7.5 8.1 8.2 6.9 8.9 8.5 8.0 7.1  Q4... 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.8 7.4 5.3 7.9 7.4 6.8 5.5 2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7  Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6  Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9  Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2  Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1169

To amend title 39, United States Code, with respect to ‘‘cooperative

mailings’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. EHRLICH, and Mr. FILNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, with respect to

‘‘cooperative mailings’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

4 The purpose of this Act is to clarify section

5 3626(j)(1)(D)(ii) of title 39, United States Code.

6 SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE MAILINGS.

7 Section 3626(j) of title 39, United States Code, is

8 amended by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(4)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

10 section or any rule or regulation of the Postal Service, but
2

•HR 1169 IH

1 subject to subparagraph (C), in the case of mail matter

2 sent (or proposed to be sent) by or on behalf of an author3 ized organization having a contractual or any other busi4 ness relationship with an entity described in subparagraph

5 (B)(ii), rates of postage under former section 4452(b) or

6 4452(c) of this title shall apply if those rates would apply

7 in the case of identical mail matter sent by such organiza8 tion absent such relationship.

9 ‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph—

10 ‘‘(i) the term ‘authorized organization’ means

11 an organization authorized to mail at the rates for

12 mail under former section 4452(b) or 4452(c) of this

13 title; and

14 ‘‘(ii) an entity described in this clause is any or15 ganization or other person that is not an authorized

16 organization.

17 ‘‘(C) This paragraph does not authorize an entity de18 scribed in subparagraph (B)(ii) to advertise, promote,

19 offer, or, for a fee or consideration, recommend, describe,

20 or announce the availability of, any of its products or serv21 ices at the rates of postage under former section 4452(b)

22 or 4452(c) of this title.’’.
3

•HR 1169 IH

1 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

2 It is the sense of the Congress that nothing in this

3 Act should be considered to alter the authority of the

4 United States Postal Service—

5 (1) to apply regular rates of postage, rather

6 than nonprofit rates, to mail matter described in

7 subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D)(i) of section

8 3626(j)(1) of title 39, United States Code; or

9 (2) to enforce any criminal law within its juris10 diction.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decisions (ROD) for Texas 
Gas Transmission, LLC (Texas Gas) Fayetteville/Greenville Expansion 
Project

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the 
Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (Texas Gas) Fayetteville/Greenville 
Expansion Project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice presents the Record of Decision (ROD) regarding 
the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) decided to 
subordinate its rights, acquired under the Wetland Reserve Program 
(WRP), to allow the Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (Texas Gas) to cross 
NRCS held conservation easements associated with the Arkansas 
Fayetteville Lateral to Mississippi Greenville Lateral Expansion 
Project in Humphreys County, Mississippi. The project will affect 
approximately one NRCS held WRP easement in Mississippi creating a 50-
foot permanent right-of-way, being 5 feet on each side of the center of 
the pipeline, and the temporary right-of-way shall be no greater than 
25 feet wide. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) prepared 
a final environmental impact statement (EIS) to fulfill requirements of 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). FERC issued the order of 
issuing certificate on May 2, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD and EIS are available upon request from 
the Natural Resource Conservation Service, Suite 1321, Federal 
Building, 100 West Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Decunda Duke-Bozeman, State WRP 
Coordinator, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Suite 1321, 
Federal Building, 100 West Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269, or by 
telephone at (601) 965-4139, extension 120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The alternatives analysis is the final EIS 
found no reasonable routes alternatives that would be environmentally 
preferable to the proposed routes. The final EIS determined that the 
proposed Fayetteville/Greenville Expansion Project as modified by the 
recommended mitigation measures is the preferred alternative. Potential 
impacts to wetlands will be avoided, minimized and mitigated through 
Texas Gas Transmission of numerous route variations, implementation of 
agency recommendations and requirements, and development of site-
specific crossing plans.

Homer L. Wilkes,
State Conservationist.
 [FR Doc. E8-22332 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
1It is the Court’s understanding, based on the

representations made by plaintiffs’ counsel at the evidentiary

hearing, that defendant received in-hand notice of the hearing on

January 3, 2007, and that defendant has neither objected to this

motion nor requested a continuance of this hearing.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Timothy M. Francis &

Tammy A. Francis

v. Civil No. 06-cv-480-JM

Lindon L. Pulley

O R D E R

Plaintiffs Timothy and Tammy Francis seek a preliminary

injunction enjoining the defendant from transferring any real

estate or real property in the defendant’s possession, or in

which the defendant has an interest. An evidentiary hearing was

held on plaintiffs’ motion on January 5, 2007. Defendant did not

appear at the hearing or file any objection to plaintiffs’

motion.1

After considering the testimonial and documentary evidence

presented at the hearing, I grant the plaintiffs’ motion for a

preliminary injunction and enjoin the defendant from selling, or

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 6 Filed 01/05/07 Page 1 of 2
2The Court previously prohibited such transfer by issuing a

Temporary Restraining Order (document no. 4) on December 28,

2006.

2

transferring any interest he may have, directly or indirectly, in

real property or real estate, including defendant’s real estate

holdings in White River Junction, Vermont.2 The Court will

supplement this ruling by further Order in the next seven days.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 5, 2007

cc: Michael G. Furlong, Esq.

John J. LaRivee, Esq.

Lindon L. Pulley, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 6 Filed 01/05/07 Page 2 of 2