alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

JARVIS PAYTON, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 544 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, NPercent except as noted

Loan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rate

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 418,402 98,603 105,232 62,494 14,081 5,043 55,22

Number of loans 17,663 3,097 4,091 4,991 1,399 116 44

Weighted average maturity (months)1 37.99 14.71 97.47 13.94 12.48 9.63 21.7

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 10.58 2.56 19.58 4.78 2.77 9.00 1.0Weighted average risk rating3 2.03 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.90 7.14 6.74 7.51 7.76 7.31 5.7 Standard error5 .19 .15 .22 .23 .28 1.04 1.0

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 7.64 7.50 7.64 8.78 8.23 7.54 5.8

 25th percentile 5.89 7.25 5.64 6.75 7.38 7.54 5.7

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.83 6.77 6.67 9.02 7.81 n.a. 5.7

 Other livestock 7.26 6.43 n.a. 7.49 7.29 n.a. 6.8

 Other current operating expenses7 7.10 7.21 6.81 7.26 7.73 7.31 6.1

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.54 10.14 6.98 7.26 8.28 n.a. 8.1

 Farm real estate 6.17 6.91 6.02 5.92 n.a. n.a. n.a

 Other8 5.64 7.06 8.23 7.49 7.70 n.a. 4.3

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 63.17 81.01 66.80 59.12 81.79 12.33 89.8

 Under commitment 57.45 82.97 55.02 44.96 80.56 100.00 72.0

 Callable 11.26 10.06 7.95 14.09 22.00 25.91 28.2

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 16.11 6.04 14.30 15.34 41.93 329.33 25.8

 Other livestock 9.87 3.03 18.30 8.88 2.11 38.87 20.3

 Other current operating expenses7 51.35 80.91 34.47 62.40 45.27 100.00 33.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.52 .30 2.57 9.92 1.88 91.74 8.7

 Farm real estate 12.90 6.65 27.73 2.96 116.37 n.a. n.a

 Other8 5.26 3.06 2.63 .51 8.81 265.77 2.3

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 18.22 7.16 28.80 10.19 27.03 239.86 30.0

 Other 80.13 91.96 69.95 85.51 67.92 100.00 78.1

 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S . Campney, Sr.

v . Civil No. 06-cv-297-JD

Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Superintenden t

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 19, 2007, Document #53, no objection having been

filed .

SO ORDERED.

January 15, 2008 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc : Randy S. Campney, Sr., pro se

Stephen D . Fuller, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00297-JD Document 56 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-09-01-JD

Gary Sydavong

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

22) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: July 11, 2007

cc: Mark Howard, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00009-JD Document 23 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 1
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1578

For the relief of Abecnego Monje Ortiz, Dolores Ortiz, and Eneyda Monje

Ortiz.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 24, 2001

Mr. GONZALEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Abecnego Monje Ortiz, Dolores Ortiz, and

Eneyda Monje Ortiz.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR

4 ABECNEGO MONJE ORTIZ, DOLORES ORTIZ,

5 AND ENEYDA MONJE ORTIZ.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

8 Act, Abecnego Monje Ortiz, Dolores Ortiz, and Eneyda

9 Monje Ortiz shall each be eligible for issuance of an immi-
2

•HR 1578 IH

1 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

2 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an

3 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec4 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

5 permanent resident.

6 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Abecnego Monje

7 Ortiz, Dolores Ortiz, or Eneyda Monje Ortiz enters the

8 United States before the filing deadline specified in sub9 section (c), he or she shall be considered to have entered

10 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be

11 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the

12 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en13 actment of this Act.

14 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

15 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap16 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica17 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

18 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

19 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

20 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res21 idence to Abecnego Monje Ortiz, Dolores Ortiz, and

22 Eneyda Monje Ortiz, the Secretary of State shall instruct

23 the proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or

24 next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant

25 visas that are made available to natives of the country of
3

•HR 1578 IH

1 the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration

2 and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of

3 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

4 country of the aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such

5 Act.

6 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

7 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

8 parents, brothers, and sisters of Abecnego Monje Ortiz,

9 Dolores Ortiz, and Eneyda Monje Ortiz shall not, by virtue

10 of such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or

11 status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Æ
#### Louis MILNER and Jacob Milkove, Individually and as Co-Partners Doing Business as Milner and Milkove Company, v. UNITED WALL PAPER FACTORIES, Inc., Beaudry Wall Paper Corporation, and J. B. Pearce Company.

No. 7822.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 10, 1938.

Mooney, Hahn, Loeser, Keough & Fulton and Brooker, Weltman & Brooker, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

***William Huck, Jr., and Paul P. Mc-Dermott, both of New York City, and J. Hall Kellogg, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

Before HICKS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and FORD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there was no error in the order and judgment appealed from, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order and judgment of the District Court be, and the same is, in all 'things affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              January 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              January 7, 2008
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 147

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain severance

payment amounts from income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

certain severance payment amounts from income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Layoff Tax Relief Act

5 of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME OF SEVERANCE PAY7 MENT AMOUNTS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

10 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended
2

•HR 147 IH

1 by redesignating section 139 as section 140 and by insert2 ing after section 138 the following new section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 139. SEVERANCE PAYMENTS.

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual,

5 gross income shall not include any qualified severance pay6 ment.

7 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The amount to which the exclu8 sion under subsection (a) applies shall not exceed $2,500

9 with respect to each separation from employment de10 scribed in subsection (c)(2).

11 ‘‘(c) QUALIFIED SEVERANCE PAYMENT.—For pur12 poses of this section—

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified sever14 ance payment’ means any payment received by an

15 individual if—

16 ‘‘(A) such payment was paid by such indi17 vidual’s employer on account of such individ18 ual’s separation from employment, and

19 ‘‘(B) such separation was in connection

20 with a reduction in the work force of the em21 ployer.

22 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—Such term shall not include

23 any payment received by an individual if the aggre24 gate payments received with respect to the separa25 tion from employment exceed $150,000.’’.
3

•HR 147 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

2 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

3 is amended by striking the item relating to section 139

4 and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 139. Severance payments.

‘‘Sec. 140. Cross references to other Acts.’’.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

7 December 31, 2000.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 55 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                        Calendar No. 90
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 55

                          [Report No. 107-154]

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2001

 Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Mr. Hunter, and Ms. Sanchez) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

                             July 23, 2001

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
    the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
approve the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of 
the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on 
June 1, 2001, with respect to Vietnam.

                                                        Calendar No. 90

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 55

                          [Report No. 107-154]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2001

 Reported adversely, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
           the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
#### Yanez GONZALO-GARZON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-56907.

D.C. No. CV-01-01129-JNK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 13, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yanez Gonzalo-Garzon, a native and citizen of Colombia, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 28 U.S.C. § 2253. After de novo review, *Murphy v. Hood,*276 F.3d 475, 477 (9th Cir.2001), we affirm.

When Gonzalo-Garzon pled guilty to his firearms offense in 1994, a deportee could seek relief under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act only if the ground for deportation had an analogous ground for exclusion listed in section *349212(a). *See Cabasug v. INS,*847 F.2d 1321, 1323 (9th Cir.1988). Firearms convictions under section 241(a)(2)(C) had no analogue in section 212(a). *Cf Cabasug,*847 F.2d at 1323 (“[a]liens convicted of weapons offenses are not among [the] ex-cludable classes” listed in section 212(a)). Therefore, Gonzalo-Garzon was statutorily ineligible for section 212(c) relief at the time of his firearms conviction and the district court properly denied his habeas petition. *See Cabasug,*847 F.2d at 1322-24; c*f. INS v. St. Cyr,*533 U.S. 289, 326, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001) (“ § 212(c) relief remains available for aliens ... who ... would have been eligible for § 212(c) relief at the time of their plea under the law then in effect”).

We deny Gonzalo-Garzon’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. *See Wood v. Housewright,*900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir.1990).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s order denying Gonzalo-Garzon’s motion for reconsideration because he failed to file an amended notice of appeal. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      25,115,934              25,115,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              475,949,603             475,949,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,097,710               7,097,710
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,609,000               2,609,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 498,103                 498,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             534,676,055             534,676,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      280,766,759             280,766,759
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       134,211                 134,211
<OTHER-SE>                                 253,775,085             253,775,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               534,676,055             534,676,055
<SALES>                                     17,275,634              17,275,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,275,189              19,275,189
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,889,845               3,889,845
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               862,150                 862,150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,370,059               4,370,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,153,135              10,153,135
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,013,081               4,013,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,140,054               6,140,054
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46                     .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45                     .45
        

</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 31**

**Certifications**

I,Richard Simpson, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark2018-B6 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: KeyBank National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank NationalAssociation; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; and National Tax Search, LLC. 

Date:    March 29, 2019 

 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

 

 
Benchmark 2018-B6Certifications (2018) 

**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-054-PB

Walter Nichols

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

September 5, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete a domestic violence group counseling

program in which he has been participating and to engage in plea

negotiations or prepare for trial. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from September 5, 2007 to December 4, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00054-PB Document 14 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 27, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to November 19, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. 

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 14, 2007

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00054-PB Document 14 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GEORGE ANDERSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 659 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Whether a defendant’s burden to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy at a suppression hearing requires that defendant to affirmatively present evidence of permission to use the vehicle where the defendant is not the registered owner of [the] vehicle but the Commonwealth’s evidence does not otherwise negate an expectation of priv acy?
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2003


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------