alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, CHARLES H. GUY III, Chief  Executive  Officer of EduLink,  Inc. (the
"Company") do hereby  certify,  in accordance  with 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

              (1)     The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                      period ending  September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic  Report")
                      fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
                      15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                      and

              (2)     The  information  contained in the Periodic  Report fairly
                      presents,   in  all  material   respects,   the  financial
                      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated November 14, 2003                 /s/ CHARLES H. GUY III
                                        -------------------------
                                        CHARLES H. GUY III
                                        Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-10-PB

Phuong H. Luong

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

December 4, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to continue to explore an alternative pretrial

disposition or prepare for trial. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 4, 2007 to February 5, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00010-PB Document 32 Filed 11/07/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The November 21, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 29, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 7, 2007

cc: Adam H. Bernstein, Esq.

Jennifer C. Davis, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00010-PB Document 32 Filed 11/07/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32





AMASYS
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)








Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Amasys Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








May
      7, 2010/s/
      C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.President,
      Chief Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1640

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to facilitate the use of

private contracts under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. PAUL, and Mr. SCHAFFER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means,

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to facilitate

the use of private contracts under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seniors’ Health Care

5 Freedom Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1640 IH

1 SEC. 2. FACILITATING THE USE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS

2 UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

3 Section 1802(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

4 1395a(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (3) and by

5 redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3)

6 and (4), respectively.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-280-01-PB

Diane Smith

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the April 4, 2006 trial

in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not object to

a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from April 4, 2006 to May 2, 2006. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00280-PB Document 9 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The March 22, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

until April 18, 2006 at 11:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 22, 2006

cc: Paul Haley, Esq.

William Morse, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00280-PB Document 9 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Randall Lee TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-7778.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

*984Randall Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Randall Lee Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). Taylor also appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Parties in a civil action are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).

The district court’s order denying relief on Taylor’s § 2254 petition was entered on the docket on September 10, 2002. Taylor’s notice of appeal was filed on November 13, 2002.1 Because Taylor failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.2

With regard to the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion, Taylor has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Taylor v. Condon,*No. CA-01-2727-3-20-BC (D.S.C. filed Oct. 11, 2002, entered Oct. 17, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *985the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

1

. For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

2

. Although Taylor filed a Rule 59(e) motion, his motion did not toll the appeal period because it was filed more than ten days after entry of the district court's final judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4).
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1384

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route in Arizona and New Mexico

which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indiantribes were forced to walk in 1863 and 1864, forstudy for potential addition to the NationalTrails System.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1384

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the

route in Arizona and New Mexico which the Navajo

and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes were forced to walk

in 1863 and 1864, for study for potential addition to

the National Trails System.
2

•HR 1384 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Walk National

5 Historic Trail Study Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds the following:

8 (1) Beginning in the fall of 1863 and ending in

9 the winter of 1864, the United States Government

10 forced thousands of Navajos and Mescalero Apaches

11 to relocate from their ancestral lands to Fort Sum12 ner, New Mexico, where the tribal members were

13 held captive, virtually as prisoners of war, for over

14 4 years.

15 (2) Thousands of Native Americans died at

16 Fort Sumner from starvation, malnutrition, disease,

17 exposure, or conflicts between the tribes and United

18 States military personnel.

19 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

20 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16

21 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol22 lowing new paragraph:

23 ‘‘(ll) The Long Walk Trail, a series of routes

24 which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes

25 were forced to walk beginning in the fall of 1863 as a
3

•HR 1384 EH

1 result of their removal by the United States Government

2 from their ancestral lands, generally located within a cor3 ridor extending through portions of Canyon de Chelley,

4 Arizona, and Albuquerque, Canyon Blanco, Anton Chico,

5 Canyon Piedra Pintado, and Fort Sumner, New Mexico.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 2,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 30, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 87 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 368
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2002

 Received; read twice and placed on the calendar pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 
                             10135(d)(5)(A)

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a 
 repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent 
    nuclear fuel, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

That there hereby is approved the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for a 
repository, with respect to which a notice of disapproval was submitted 
by the Governor of the State of Nevada on April 8, 2002.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 368

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a 
 repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent 
    nuclear fuel, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 9, 2002

 Received; read twice and placed on the calendar pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 
                             10135(d)(5)(A)
```
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            679 - INDS 2006-A CES (UBS)



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-97-3-4-6-SM

Leslie B. Smith, Allen R. Hall,

and Terri Hodgkins

O R D E R

Defendants Leslie Smith and Terri Hodgkins have filed motions to

continue the final pretrial conference and trial (document nos. 99 and 100). 

Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008 trial period. Defendants Hodgkins 

and Smith shall file a waivers of speedy trial rights not later than March 31,

2008. On the filing of such waivers, the continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: May 20, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 103 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 20, 2008 

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Clyde R.W.Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 103 Filed 03/20/08 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

BILLY TYLER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

4:23CV3099

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. 

Filing No. 4. Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff is financially 

eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, 

and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next 

step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine 

whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will 

conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

4:23-cv-03099-JFB-PRSE Doc # 5 Filed: 06/01/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 21
2

Dated this 1st day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

4:23-cv-03099-JFB-PRSE Doc # 5 Filed: 06/01/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 22
EXHIBIT
32





AMASYS
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)








Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Amasys Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








February
      11, 2010/s/
      C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.President,
      Chief Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
No. 72-1016.

#### Chip Steak Co., Inc., et al. *v.*Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1640 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1640

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to facilitate the use 
            of private contracts under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2001

  Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. Paul, and Mr. Schaffer) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to facilitate the use 
            of private contracts under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seniors' Health Care Freedom Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. FACILITATING THE USE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1802(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395a(b)) is 
amended by striking paragraph (3) and by redesignating paragraphs (4) 
and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.
                                 <all>
```