alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1015

To provide for an increase in the amount of Servicemember’s Group Life

Insurance paid to survivors of members of the Armed Forces who died

in the performance of duty between November 1, 2000, and April 1,

2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2001

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. SCHROCK,

Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. CANTOR, and Mr. GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for an increase in the amount of Servicemember’s

Group Life Insurance paid to survivors of members of

the Armed Forces who died in the performance of duty

between November 1, 2000, and April 1, 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1015 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN SERVICEMEMBER’S GROUP LIFE

2 INSURANCE BENEFIT FOR SERVICEMEMBERS

3 DYING IN PERFORMANCE OF DUTY BETWEEN

4 DATE OF ENACTMENT AND EFFECTIVE DATE

5 OF RECENT BENEFIT INCREASE.

6 (a) INCREASE IN SGLI BENEFIT.—In the case of a

7 member of the Armed Forces who (as determined by the

8 Secretary concerned) died in the performance of duty dur9 ing the period beginning on November 1, 2000, and end10 ing at the close of March 31, 2001, and who on the date

11 of death was insured under the Servicemember’s Group

12 Life Insurance program for the maximum amount of in13 surance available under the program, the Secretary of Vet14 erans Affairs shall increase the amount of insurance pay15 able under that program by reason of that member’s death

16 by $50,000 (such amount being the amount by which the

17 automatic maximum amount of insurance under that pro18 gram is increased effective April 1, 2001, pursuant to sec19 tion 312(a) of Public Law 106–419, enacted November

20 1, 2000).

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section:

22 (1) The term ‘‘Servicemember’s Group Life In23 surance program’’ means the program of life insur24 ance administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af25 fairs under subchapter III of chapter 19 of title 38,

26 United States Code.
3

•HR 1015 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ has the

2 meaning given that term in section 101(25) of title

3 38, United States Code.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kathleen E. Brush, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

| Dated:  May 12, 2003 | /s/ KATHLEEN E. BRUSH                                       |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                             |
|                      | **Kathleen E. Brush President and Chief Executive Officer** |
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2014


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: November 5, 2014
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | 1. | to                the best of our knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | to                the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  November                  14, 2007 | /s/                  Burton Katz               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      | Burton                  Katz                   |   |
|                                                      | Chief                  Executive Officer  |   |
|                                                      |                                           |   |
| Date:                  November                  14, 2007 | /s/                  Allan Legator             |   |
|                                                      | Allan                  Legator                 |   |
|                                                      | Chief                  Financial Officer       |   |

----
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-Q
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2010,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2010
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Charley Changmin Yoon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2018-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 13, 2020



| | By: | /s/ Charley Changmin Yoon                                    
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Charley Changmin Yoon                                  
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacob A. BOLDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-6865.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 24, 2003.

Decided Aug. 12, 2003.

Jacob A. Bolden, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jacob A. Bolden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 15, 2002. The notice *250of appeal was filed on May 21, 2003.* Because Bolden failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hypertherm, Inc.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-373-JD

American Torch Tip Company

O R D E R

A conference was held with counsel on this date to review

scheduling matters. 

The trial of this case is rescheduled to April 27, 2009. A

jury will be selected on that date and evidence will begin

immediately following jury selection. It is anticipated that the

case may take five to seven days to try. While the date of the

trial has been changed, all other deadlines remain in effect.

There are a number of motions in limine that are currently

pending. The court intends to address these motions and issue

orders within the next ten days to two weeks.

With respect to Hypertherm's Motion for Leave to Serve

Updated Damages Calculations (document no. 403), counsel agreed

that they will review this matter in an effort to resolve it and

report back to the court by February 11, 2009.

Hypertherm's Motion to Exclude ATTC's Expert (document no.

401) is scheduled for hearing on February 24, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. 

The hearing is expected to take approximately three hours.

Counsel and the court discussed the court's proposed

procedural order. Counsel informed the court how they intended

Case 1:05-cv-00373-JD Document 483 Filed 02/03/09 Page 1 of 2
2

to proceed to comply with that order once it has been issued. 

The court has on this date issued that order.

The final pretrial conference is scheduled for 10:30 a.m. on

Friday, April 17, 2009.

A teleconference with the court is tentatively scheduled for

Friday, April 3, 2009, at 10 a.m. to review, if necessary, the

documents prepared pursuant to the procedural order issued on

this date.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

February 3, 2009

cc: Jill C. Anderson, Esquire

Jacob K. Baron, Esquire

Steven M. Bauer, Esquire

Lucas M. Blower, Esquire

Colin G. Cabral, Esquire

Seth M. Cannon, Esquire

Joseph A. Capraro, Jr., Esquire

Christopher J. Carney, Esquire

Jeffery M. Cross, Esquire

Joseph T. Dattilo, Esquire

Maia H. Harris, Esquire

Marc H. Kallish, Esquire

Rhett R. Krulla, Esquire

Jonathan A. Lax, Esquire

Edward F. McCormack, Esquire

Richard C. Nelson, Esquire

W. Scott O'Connell, Esquire

Jeremy P. Oczek, Esquire

Richard D. Rochford, Jr., Esquire

David W. Ruoff, Esquire

John T. Shapiro, Esquire

John M. Skeriotis, Esquire

Benjamin M. Stern, Esquire

Wayne Tang, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00373-JD Document 483 Filed 02/03/09 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 124

        To provide for the full funding of Federal Pell Grants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Keller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To provide for the full funding of Federal Pell Grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pell Grant Full Funding Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FULLY FUNDING FEDERAL PELL GRANTS.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1070a) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(k) Availability of Funds.--Each fiscal year there shall be 
available to the Secretary, from funds not otherwise appropriated, such 
amounts as may be necessary to pay to each student the amount for which 
such student is eligible under this section.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 401(b)(3)(A) of such Act is 
amended by striking ``for which an appropriation Act provides a maximum 
basic grant in an amount in excess of $2,700''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-11-01/02/03-SM

Tai Tuan Nguyen,

Nu T. Tran, and

Quoc My Tran

O R D E R

Defendant Nguyen’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 22). Trial has been rescheduled for the September

2007 trial period. Defendant Nguyen has filed a waiver of speedy trial rights. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant s in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00011-SM Document 24 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

April 25, 2007 

cc: James D. Gleason, Esq.

Michael Smith, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq. 

Jennifer C. Davis, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00011-SM Document 24 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EPS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 DID NOT CHANGE AS A RESULT OF THE 
ADOPTION OF SFAS 128, SO NO AMENDED DATA SCHEDULE HAS BEEN FILED.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      22,535,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              298,788,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,305,128
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,366,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                 245,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             329,078,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       99,232,640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,422
<OTHER-SE>                                 229,712,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               329,078,095
<SALES>                                     12,304,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,126,258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,613,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               651,014
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,800,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,061,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,440,771
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,620,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,620,562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	 

	 




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of August 29, 2019, by and between Mount Tam Biotechnologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Maker”), and Fromar Investments, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Holder”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.Maker and Holder entered into that certain Line of Credit Agreement on May 10, 2019 (the “Loan Agreement”). 

 

B.In connection with the Loan Agreement, Maker and Holder entered into that certain Promissory Note effective as of May 1, 2019 (the “Note”).  

 

C.Maker and Holder have agreed to amend the Loan Agreement pursuant to Sections 5 and 8.5 thereof, pursuant to the terms set forth herein.  

 

D.Maker and Holder have agreed to amend the Note pursuant to the terms thereof, pursuant to the terms set forth herein. 

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.The Loan Agreement is hereby amended by extending the Maturity Date thereof this one and final time only to October 31, 2019. 

 

2.The Note is hereby amended by extending the Maturity Date thereof this one and final time only to October 31, 2019. 

 

3.This Amendment supersedes any and all other provisions of the Loan Agreement and Note which are in conflict with this instrument. 

 

4.This Amendment constitutes the full and complete agreement between the parties hereto.  All other provisions of the Loan Agreement and Note not modified herein shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

[Signature page follows]


 




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Line of Credit Agreement and Promissory Note effective as of the date set forth above.

 

 

 

	 

	MAKER:

 

Mount Tam Biotechnologies, Inc.

 

 

By:       /s/ Richard Marshak

Name:Richard Marshak 

Title:Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 


	 

	HOLDER:

 

Fromar Investments, LP

 

 

By:       /s/ Doug Froese

Name:Doug Froese 

Title: Partner 





Signature Page to First Amendment to Line of Credit Agreement and Promissory Note

4838-6313-7442
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3731

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Aaron Byrd

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: May 17, 2017

Filed: June 2, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Byrd directly appeals the within-Sentencing Guidelines sentence

imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to a drug conspiracy offense,

1

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.
pursuant to a written plea agreement that contained a waiver of the right to appeal his

conviction and sentence except on enumerated grounds. Byrd’s counsel has moved

to withdraw, and in a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

counsel challenges the sentence as substantively unreasonable and contests the

application of certain Guidelines enhancements.

We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case, because our review of the

record demonstrates that Byrd entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver

knowingly and voluntarily; the arguments presented fall within the scope of the

appeal waiver; and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. 

See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Having

independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this

appeal.

______________________________

-2-