alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 05-cv-010-SM

Opinion No. 2006 DNH 051

Kristi L. Eglody,

Defendant

O R D E R

A single claim of malicious prosecution, arising from a

criminal charge against plaintiff for attempted violation of a

stalking order, prosecuted in the New Hampshire Superior Court

(Crim. No. 03-S-1078), is all that remains in this case. Before

the court is defendant’s second supplemental motion for summary

judgment. Plaintiff objects. 

“To succeed in an action for malicious prosecution, the

plaintiff must prove that he was subjected to a criminal

prosecution instituted by the defendant without probable cause

and with malice, and that the criminal proceeding terminated in

his favor.” Hogan v. Robert H. Irwin Motors, Inc., 121 N.H. 737,

739 (1981) (quoting Stock v. Byers, 120 N.H. 844, 845 (1980))

(internal quotation marks omitted).

Case 1:05-cv-00010-SM Document 76 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The undisputed factual record in this case now establishes

that defendant did not initiate the prosecution in Crim. No. 03-

S-1078. Rather, the criminal investigation that eventually led

to plaintiff’s prosecution on that charge was based upon a report

by plaintiff’s own mother, Judith MacDonald. Because defendant

did not institute the prosecution in Crim. No. 03-S-1078, she

cannot, as a matter of law, be liable for malicious prosecution

relative to the specified charge.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment

(document no. 72) is granted, thus rendering moot her motion to

stay discovery (document no. 73) and her motion to strike

(document no. 75). The clerk of the court shall enter judgment

in accordance with this order and close the case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

April 28, 2006

cc: William J. Carey, pro se

Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00010-SM Document 76 Filed 04/28/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                 320
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               29,444
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        19,764
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                         10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               29,764
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         0
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                                   0     
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1427 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1427

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the issuance of 
     tax-exempt bonds for certain air and water pollution control 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

    Mr. Bentsen (for himself and Mr. Brady of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the issuance of 
     tax-exempt bonds for certain air and water pollution control 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Air Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR AIR AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 
              FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 142 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining exempt facility bond) is amended by 
striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (11), by striking the period at 
the end of paragraph (12) and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(13) air or water pollution control facilities (within 
        the meaning of section 103 as in effect before the enactment of 
        the Tax Reform Act of 1986).''
    (b) Bonds in Nonattainment Areas Not Subject to Volume Cap.--
Subsection (g) of section 146 of such Code is amended by striking 
``and'' at the end of paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 
of paragraph (4) and inserting ``, and'', and by inserting after 
paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) any exempt facility bond issued during 2003, 2004, 
        2005, 2006, or 2007 as part of an issue described in paragraph 
        (13) of section 142(a) (relating to air or water pollution 
        control facilities), but only if any facility which the 
        proceeds of such bond are to be used to provide is located 
        within a nonattainment area (as defined by section 171(2) of 
        the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7501(2).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to obligations issued after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 2 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 3 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 4 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 5 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 6 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 7 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 8 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 9 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 10 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 11 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 12 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 13 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 14 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 15 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 16 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 17 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 18 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 19 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 20 of 21
Case: 13-10872-BAH Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/12/13 Desc: Main Document Page 21 of 21
Case 1:06-cv-00477-JD Document 27-1 Filed 09/14/07 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00477-JD Document 27-1 Filed 09/14/07 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00477-JD Document 27-1 Filed 09/14/07 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; KeyBank National Association;  LNR Partners, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC; Berkeley Point Capital LLC, dba Newmark Knight Frank;  Argentic Services Company LP; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:March 30, 2022

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CGCMT 2018-C6 Certifications
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

JOHN JOSEPH HOFFMEISTER and 

HOFFMEISTER HOMES, INC., a 

Nebraska Corporation,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

THE CITY OF SCRIBNER, 

NEBRASKA, a political subdivision of 

the State of Nebraska, and 

KENNETH W. THOMAS, in his 

official capacity as Mayor of Scribner, 

Nebraska,

Defendants.

4:23-CV-3094

JUDGMENT

On the parties' stipulation and joint motion to dismiss (filing 31), this 

case is dismissed with prejudice, costs taxed to the parties incurring them.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

John M. Gerrard

Senior United States District Judge

4:23-cv-03094-JMG-SMB Doc # 32 Filed: 03/26/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 66
H. R. 1552

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act through November 1, 2003, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Tax Nondiscrimination

Act’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT MORATORIUM.

Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C.

151 note) is amended by striking ‘‘3 years after the date of the

enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on November 1, 2003’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1079. LULE v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Request for Change of Venue, which we

construe as a motion to transfer to the Supreme Court, the motion is hereby

GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 15, 2018

02/15/2018
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly
report of StemGen, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Simon Dawson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: August 3, 2022
    BY: /s/ Simon DawsonSimon DawsonCEO and Chairman of the Board  A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within
the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### David E. ACEVEDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45802.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 19, 1972.

No Attorney on Appeal.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $100.00.

The complaint alleged that the offense was committed on or about the 22nd day *460of November, 1970. The information based on the complaint alleged that the offense was committed on or about the 20th day of November, 1970.

It has been consistently held that a variance between the complaint and the information as to the date when the offense was committed is fatal to the validity of the information. Harrison v. State, 297 S.W.2d 823 (Tex.Cr.App.1957) and cases cited; Wheat v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 259, 356 S.W.2d 323 (1962) and cases cited; Beasley v. State, 397 S.W.2d 454 (Tex.Cr.App.1966) and cases cited; and Thomas v. State, 474 S.W.2d 236 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN M. DUTTON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MUELLER & DRURY PC; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16202 

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00069-JJT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017**

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

John M. Dutton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-16202 

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Cervantes v. 

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Dutton’s action because Dutton failed 

to allege facts sufficient to show a qualifying “debt” and that Dutton is a 

“consumer” under the FDCPA. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(3), (5) (defining 

“consumer” and “debt” under the FDCPA).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint 

without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. See Cervantes, 656 

F.3d at 1041 (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without 

leave to amend is proper when amendment would be futile); see also Walls v. 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 276 F.3d 502, 510-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding that an 

FDCPA claim based on an alleged violation of the Bankruptcy Code is precluded 

because the sole remedy “lies in the Bankruptcy Code”).

We reject as unsupported by the record Dutton’s contention that the district 

judge was biased.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1792-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1792-DR), dated September 13, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 13, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 13, 2008.

Jefferson, Lafourche, Plaquemines, and Terrebonne Parishes for Individual Assistance and debris removal (Category A), including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-21954 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Misc. No. 06-001-JD

)

JAMES M. RAMALHO, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

MOTION TO VACATE

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Local Rules of the United States

District Court for the District of New Hampshire, the United

States of America moves this Court to vacate the Order to Show

Cause issued in this case on January 9, 2006. In support of this

motion, the United States makes the following statements:

1. The United States of America filed a Petition to

Enforce IRS Summons against James M. Ramalho on January 3, 2006.

2. On January 9, 2006, an Order to Show Cause was issued,

ordering Mr. Ramalho’s appearance before the Magistrate Judge on

February 16, 2006, at 9:30 a.m.

3. On February 3, 2006, the United States withdrew its

request for enforcement of the summons.

4. Based on the United States’ withdrawal, this Court has

administratively closed this case. However, the January 9, 2006

Order to Show Cause still exists.

5. In order to avoid any confusion, the United States

requests that the Order to Show Cause be formally vacated by the

Court.

Case 1:06-mc-00001-JD Document 8 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 2
2

6. A good faith attempt has been made to contact

Respondent Ramalho, but there was no answer at his telephone

number.

7. Due to the nature of this motion, no supporting

memorandum of law is necessary.

For these reasons, the United States requests that the Court

vacate the Order to Show Cause which it issued in this case on

January 9, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

 /s/ Gretchen Leah Witt

By:

Gretchen Leah Witt

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

NH Bar No. 2775

53 Pleasant Street

Concord, NH 03301

603-225-1552

gretchen.witt@usdoj.gov

February 8, 2006

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 8th day of February, 2006, a copy of

the above Motion was mailed, via certified, return receipt

requested, to James M. Ramalho at 24 Bullard Drive, Hooksett, New

Hampshire 03106 and at 33 Bullard Drive, Hooksett, New Hampshire

03106.

 /s/ Gretchen Leah Witt

 

Gretchen Leah Witt, AUSA

Case 1:06-mc-00001-JD Document 8 Filed 02/08/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of
AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV LP (the
“Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




Date:
August 14, 2009




AIS
FUTURES FUND IV L.P.
 
 By:  AIS
FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC
 General
Partner
 
 By: /s/ John
Hummel
 John
Hummel
 President
(principal executive and principal financial
officer)