alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Data Format

Each series begins with a description line followed by a number of data lines.

- Description line:  series description in double quotes
- Data line:
  Column 1-8   : series code in double quotesColumn 9      : blankColumn 10-13 : year, in YYYY formatColumn 14-121: data, 9 positions per month including decimal and 3 decimal places.
- Column 1-8   : series code in double quotes
- Column 9      : blank
- Column 10-13 : year, in YYYY format
- Column 14-121: data, 9 positions per month including decimal and 3 decimal places.

---
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1134

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the exemption

from the self-employment tax for certain termination payments received

by former life insurance salesmen.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. WELLER (for himself, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, and Mr.

POMEROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the exemption from the self-employment tax for certain

termination payments received by former life insurance

salesmen.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Former Insurance

5 Agents Tax Equity Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1134 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF EXEMPTION FROM SELF-EM2 PLOYMENT TAX FOR CERTAIN TERMINATION

3 PAYMENTS RECEIVED BY FORMER INSUR4 ANCE SALESMEN.

5 (a) INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.—Paragraph (4) of

6 section 1402(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re7 lating to codification of treatment of certain termination

8 payments received by former insurance salesmen) is

9 amended to read as follows:

10 ‘‘(4) the amount of such payment depends pri11 marily on policies sold by or credited to the account

12 of such individual or the extent to which such poli13 cies remain in force for some period after such ter14 mination, or both.’’.

15 (b) SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—Paragraph (4) of sec16 tion 211(j) of the Social Security Act is amended to read

17 as follows:

18 ‘‘(4) the amount of such payment depends pri19 marily on policies sold by or credited to the account

20 of such individual or the extent to which such poli21 cies remain in force for some period after such ter22 mination, or both.’’.

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

24 this section shall apply to payments after December 31,

25 2001.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                     Exhibit 32.1

            Certification of Chief Executive Officer
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Executive Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the
"Company") certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company
that he has reviewed the Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended December 31, 2003 and that to the best of his
or her knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
          13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or it staff upon request.



February 20, 2004                  /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D
                                   C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                   Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-97-01/02-SM

Edward Cervantes Arias

and Jose Luis Alsina-Ortiz

O R D E R

Defendant Arias’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 19). Trial has been rescheduled for the November 2006

trial period. Defendant Arias shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than September 7, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: October 30, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: November 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 20 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

August 29, 2006

cc: Richard N. Foley, Esq.

Jose A. Espinosa, Esq.

Michael Sheehan, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00097-SM Document 20 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 36 84

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. Reg in al d L. Fo rd

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Marc h 2 9, 2 01 6 Fi le d: Apri l 1 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Reg in al d Fo rd di rect ly ap pe al s th e se nt en ce im po se d by th e di st ric t co ur t aft er 1 he pl ed gu il ty t o a dr

ug of fen se , p ur su an t to a pl ea ag reem en t co n t a i n i n g an ap pe al

Th e Hon or ab le Bet h Ph il li ps , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te r n 1 Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.waiv er. His co un se l ha s m ov ed t o w i t h d raw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And er s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 ( 1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at Fo rd ’s se nt en ce is un reas on ab le an d th at Fo rd rece iv ed in effe ct iv e as si st an ce of co un se l. F o r d h a s fil ed a su pp le m en ta l br ie f, arg ui ng th at th e di st ric t co ur t m is ap pl ie d th e care er-o ffen de r pr ov is io ns of th e Gui de li ne s, in li gh t of Jo hn so n v. Uni te d St at es , 13 5 S. Ct

. 2 5 5 1 ( 2 0 1 5 )

. Fi rs t, we de cl in e to reac h th e in effe ct iv e-as si st an ce cl ai m on di rect ap pe al

. Se e Uni te d St at es

v. Rami re z- Her na nd ez , 44 9 F.3 d 82 4, 82 6- 27 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (in effe ct iv e-as si st an ce cl ai m s are us ua ll y be st li t i g a t e d i n co ll at eral pr oc eed in gs , whe re reco rd can be pr op erl y de ve lo pe d)

. Seco nd , as to th e rem ai ni ng arg um en ts , we en fo rce th e ap pe al waiv e r. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Sc ot t , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) ( de no vo
rev ie w); Uni te d St a t e s v

. An d is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 88 9- 90 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en ba nc ) (ap pe al waiv er wil l be en fo rced if ap pe al fal ls wit hi n sc op e of waiv er, de fen da nt kn owi ng ly an d vo lu nt ari ly en te red in to waiv er an d pl ea ag reem en t, an d en fo rci ng waiv er w o u l d n ot res ul t in m is carr ia ge of jus ti ce). Fi na ll y , ha vi ng in de pe nd en tl y
rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v

. O h i o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we fin d no
no nf riv ol ou s i ss ue s fo r ap pe al

.

Acco rd in gl y , we di sm is s t he ap pe al an d g ran t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: May 14, 2003

                                               J. BEN HATHAWAY
                                               ---------------
                                               J. Ben Hathaway
                                                  President


























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




     Date: May 14, 2003

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JAKE LEON MILLS NO. 

### 2023 KW 1332


### FEBRUARY 16, 

### 2024

In Re: State of Louisiana, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Tammany, No. 589075.
BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s ruling 

### granting the 

### defendant's " Motion 

### for Verdicts Other 

## Than Conviction to be by Concurrence of Ten Jurors" 

### is reversed. In Ramos v. Louisiana, 

### 590 U. S. ----- 140 

### S.Ct. 1390, 206 

### L.Ed.2d 583 ( 2020) , the Supreme Court did not 

### distinguish between acquittals and convictions when 

## declaring nonunanimous verdicts unconstitutional. State v. Rodgers, 

### 2021-190 ( La. 

### App. 3d Cir. 

### 4/ 14/21), 318 So. 3d 

### 315, 

### 316, writ 

### denied, 

### 2021-00675 ( La. 

### 9/27/21), 324 

### So.3d 87. Therefore, we 

### find that the defendant's argument that he 

### is entitled to a nonunanimous 

## juryverdict for an acquittal is without merit. 

## Accordingly, this matter 

### is remanded to the trial court for 

### further proceedings consistent 

### withthis ruling. JEW EW 

## Stromberg, J., 

### dissents.



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# tPUTY CLERKOF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Appendix A to item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Article 5 of Regulation S-X
(in thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          13,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    377,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               434,647
<PP&E>                                         329,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 691,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           396
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   691,799
<SALES>                                        326,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326,976
<CGS>                                          198,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (106)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,055
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53025-53026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


The National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Interagency Committee on 
Smoking and Health

    Notice of Cancellation: This notice was published in the Federal 
Register on August 15, 2008, Volume 73, Number 159, page 47952. The 
meeting previously scheduled to convene on September 16, 2008 has been 
cancelled.
    For Further Information Contact: Ms. Monica L. Swann, Management 
and Program Analyst, Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, M/S K50, Atlanta, GA 
30341; telephone (770) 488-5278, fax (770) 488-5767; E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6cbd5d1c7c8c8e6c5c2c588c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65081612040b0b250601064b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and

[[Page 53026]]

Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 8, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Service Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-21280 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Accountants' Acknowledgment


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

             Re:     Registration Statements Numbers 333-26819, 333-26827,
                     333-55803 and 333-71903 on Form S-8

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness  of the use therein of our report  dated April 19, 1999 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




KPMG LLP



New York, New York
August 13, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1373 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1373

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 310 South State Street in St. Ignace, Michigan, as the ``Robert W. 
                     Davis Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 310 South State Street in St. Ignace, Michigan, as the ``Robert W. 
                     Davis Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT W. DAVIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 310 South State Street in St. Ignace, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert W. Davis Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Robert W. 
Davis Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 No. 04-08-00809-CR

Martin MARROQUIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-3428

Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 15, 2009

AFFIRMED

Defendant, Martin Marroquin, originally pled guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child

pursuant to a plea bargain. However, the trial court informed defendant it would not follow the plea

agreement and allowed defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea. Defendant indicated he did

not wish to withdraw his plea, and he pled guilty to aggravated sexual assault. The trial court

assessed punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement.
04-08-00809-CR

1... No substitute counsel will be appointed. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408 n.22 (Tex. Crim. App.

2008). Should defendant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, defendant

must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review.

Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely

motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must

be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of

the filings in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the

requirements of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.4. 

-2-

Defendant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional

evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.

Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel

provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief.

Defendant did not file a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, and we GRANT appellate

counsel’s motion to withdraw.1 Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997,

no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). 

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hews Company, LLC

v. Civil No. 04-cv-292-JM

Bruce Barnaby and

Barnaby’s Truck & Equipment, Inc.

O R D E R

 Bruce Barnaby is ordered to appear before me on December 19,

2006 at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why he should not be held in

contempt for failure to comply with my order of November 22,

2005. See Motion, Document no. 67. He is ordered to produce at

that time all monthly statements of L & B Barnaby, LLC’s income

and expenditures since December of 2005, the state and federal

tax filings of L & B Barnaby, LLC since November of 2005 and of

all payments made to or for his benefit from L & B Barnaby since

November of 2005. Plaintiff is ordered to serve a copy of this

order, personally, on Mr. Barnaby. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 6, 2006

cc: Timothy J. Bryant, Esq.

 Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.

 William S. Gannon, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00292-JM Document 68 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 1