alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's unaudited September 30, 1999 financial statements and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,361,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            24,800,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 20,630,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      37,368,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        37,286,000
<LOANS>                                    111,759,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,254,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             206,394,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 187,040,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            575,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,035,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (256,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             206,394,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,540,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,847,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               591,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,978,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,200,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,778,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  135,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,187,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,456,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,456,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,199,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     25,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    25,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,127,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,254,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,254,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         36,000



</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-00301-SM Document 15 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-133-01-PB

Andre Laventure

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a “probable cause” hearing under Fed.

R. Crim. P. 32.1 on several alleged violations of conditions of

supervision. I therefore find probable cause to hold him for a

revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee and that

he poses no danger to any other person or to the community.

Defendant wasted no time in resuming his use of illegal drugs and

has ignored his drug testing call-in requirements. He is out of

control and a danger to the community. There are no conditions

which are likely to assure his presence and the safety of the

community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

Case 1:06-cr-00133-PB Document 8 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
2

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 1, 2006

cc: Mark H. Campbell, Esq.

 Debra M. Walsh, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00133-PB Document 8 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJuly 24, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) duringthe period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: /s/ Marc WomackName: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: /s/ Erik LaneyName: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 3, 2018 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from November 21, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from SEC Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      18,638,718              19,004,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,402,685              10,914,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,913,777               7,043,381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,120,085              37,126,897
<PP&E>                                     289,211,129             289,948,439
<DEPRECIATION>                            (26,539,539)             (32,437,443)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             338,161,562             337,390,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,667,144              19,126,353
<BONDS>                                    209,830,918             206,975,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                      10
<OTHER-SE>                               (108,825,155)            (121,506,725)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               338,161,562             337,390,943
<SALES>                                     14,821,905              32,570,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,208,731              33,911,478
<CGS>                                        5,061,346              13,628,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,254,005              17,441,226 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,654,804               6,115,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,369,754              21,587,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,975,915)            (11,233,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,975,915)            (11,233,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,975,915)            (11,233,552)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued August 30 , 201 8

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 8 - 0 0 337 - CV

——————————— LORETTER BROCK , Appellant

V. YANWEI CEN , Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1 106584 MEMORANDUM OPINION In this forcible - detainer action, appellant, Loretter Brock , appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting possession of certain real property to appellee, Yanwei Cen . We dismiss the appeal as moot.2

The only issue in a forcible - detainer action is the right to actual possession of the subject property; “the merits of the title shall not be adjudicated .” T EX . R. C IV . P . 746; see Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass’n , 349 S.W.3d 766, 768

– 69 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.). Therefore, a lthough the failure to supersede a forcible - detainer judgment does not divest an appellant of the right to a ppeal, an appeal from a forcible - detainer action becomes moot if the appellant is no longer in possession of the property, unless the appellant holds and asserts “a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession” of the property. Mar shall v. Housing Auth . of the City of San Antonio , 198 S.W.3d 782, 786

– 87 (Tex. 2006); see Wilhelm , 349 S.W.3d at 768; Gallien v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Cor p. , No. 01 - 07 - 00075 - CV, 2008 WL 4670465, at *2

– 4 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 23, 2008, pet. d ism’d w.o.j.) (mem. op.) . The record reflects that appellant did not supersede the judgment , a writ of possession was executed on April 2, 2018 , and that appellant no longer has possession of the property at issue in the underlying forcible detainer action . On J uly 12, 201 8 , this Court issued a letter informing appellant that the record indicates that the appeal is moot because appellee now has possession of the subject property. We requested that appellant file a response to whether the appeal was moot. Appellant did not timely respond, and, therefore, has failed to assert a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property. See3

Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm , 349 S.W.3d at 768; Soza v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp . , No. 01 - 11 - 00568 - CV, 2013 WL 3148616, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] June 18, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that appellant who failed to respond to appellee’s motion to dismiss had failed to assert potentially meritorious claim of right to cur rent, actual possession). Accordingly, we dismiss the case as moot . See Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 785, 787, 790; Wilhelm , 349 S.W.3d at 769 ; Bey v. ASD Fin., Inc. , No. 05 - 14 - 00534 - CV, 2014 WL 4180933, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Aug. 11, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op .) (dismissing appeal of forcible detainer action as moot because appellant no longer possessed property at issue); see also T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c) . We dismiss all other pending motions as moot . PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey .
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 130

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and

gift taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. MCINNIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the estate and gift taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Termi5 nation Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

7 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subtitle B of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to estate, gift, and genera9 tion-skipping taxes) is hereby repealed.
2

•HR 130 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub2 section (a) shall apply to the estates of decedents dying,

3 and gifts and generation-skipping transfers made, after

4 December 31, 2000.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40855

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

URIEL BLANCO-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-289-1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Uriel Blanco-Perez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Blanco-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40855 Document: 00512210423 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
No. 12-40855

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-40855 Document: 00512210423 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIE GAO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73876

Agency No. A095-448-618

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jie Gao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s

FILED

MAY 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73876

denial of a motion to reopen. Guzman v. INS, 318 F.3d 911, 912 n.1 (9th Cir.

2003) (per curiam). We deny the petition for review.

Gao contends that the BIA erred in denying her motion to reopen because it

failed to recognize that Chinese authorities distinguish between activist and nonactivist members of the China Democracy Party (“CDP”) and that the latter have

been subject to increased mistreatment since her in absentia removal order in 2002. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Gao’s untimely motion to reopen

because the record, including the State Department’s 2006 country report, does not

show a material change in conditions in China for CDP members since Gao was

first ordered removed. See Almaraz v. Holder, 608 F.3d 638, 640-42 (9th Cir.

2010). Accordingly, Gao’s motion to reopen fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel Childs

v . Civil No. 05-cv-436-JD

Hillsborou,gh County Department of Corrections, et al .

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 2, 2006, no objection having been filed .

SO ORDERED.

May 23, 2006 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Daniel Childs, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00436-JD Document 6 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H.R. 1278

To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue

Northwest in the District of Columbia as the ‘‘Frank F. Church Federal

Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 28, 2001

Ms. MCKINNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia as

the ‘‘Frank F. Church Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania

5 Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia, commonly

6 known as the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Building, shall be

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Frank F. Church Federal

8 Building’’.
2

•HR 1278 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Frank F. Church Federal Building’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,500
<SECURITIES>                                    34,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,500
<PP&E>                                         156,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 461,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,100
<BONDS>                                         65,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   461,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 2015


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 3, 2016
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------