alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the "Company")
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended March 31, 2004 and that
to the best of his or her knowledge:

         1.       the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.



May 17, 2004                                 /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                             Principal Finance Officer
                                             (Chief Financial Officer)
United States District Court 

for the District of New Hampshire 

Dynamic Network Services, Inc., 

 Plaintiff 

vs. No. 06-cv-37-JM

Timothy J. Wilde, 

 Defendant 

Appearance

Please enter our Appearance on behalf of the Defendant, Timothy J. Wilde, 1175 Lake 

Boulevard, No. 105, Davis, CA 95616. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

Pierce Atwood LLP 

Date: April 3, 2006 By: /s/ Lawrence M. Edelman

 Lawrence M. Edelman 

 N.H. Bar No. 738 

 Pease International Tradeport 

 One New Hampshire Avenue 

 Suite 350 

 Portsmouth, NH 03801 

 (603) 433-6300 

{P0111469.1}

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 8 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
{P0111469.1}2

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Appearance was served on the following on 

this 3rd day of April, 2006 and in the manner specified herein: 

Electronically Served Through ECF: 

 Christopher Cole, Esquire 

 Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green 

 1000 Elm Street 

 P.O. Box 3701 

 Manchester, NH 03105 

 E-mail: ccole@sheehan.com 

 /s/ Lawrence M. Edelman

 Lawrence M. Edelman 

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 8 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-149-01-SM

Thomas Brewster

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 8) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than January 25, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00149-SM Document 9 Filed 01/16/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: April 19, 2006 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection: May 2, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

January 16, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

 Philip Desfosses, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00149-SM Document 9 Filed 01/16/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

EZEKIYAL WELLS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

RALSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant.

8:23CV226

FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff commenced this action against Defendants, Ralston Public Schools and Thomas 

Earhart, on May 26, 2023. (Filing No. 1). Both Defendants filed Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s claims. (Filing No. 8; Filing No. 13). On September 28, 2023, the Court entered a 

Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 18) granting Defendant Earhart’s motion to dismiss, but

denying Defendant Ralston Public Schools’ motion to dismiss “to allow Plaintiff to amend his 

complaint to include damages that are cognizable under Title VI.” The Court clarified “that the 

only issue left remaining in this case is the Title VI claim against the Ralston School District.” 

The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 14-days of the order, i.e., by 

October 12, 2023. 

On October 16, 2023, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause because Plaintiff had not 

filed an amended complaint within 14-days as ordered. (Filing No. 19). The Court noted that the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this district’s local rules contemplate dismissal of a case on 

the grounds that the plaintiff failed to prosecute or failed to comply with orders of the court. Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(b) (providing that an action may be involuntarily dismissed “[i]f the plaintiff fails to 

prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order”); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 

630-31 (1962) (stating the district court possesses the power to dismiss sua sponte under Rule 

41(b)). Because the Court had ordered Plaintiff to amend his complaint to include cognizable 

damages as to his only remaining claim, and he failed to do so, the Court provided Plaintiff until 

November 6, 2023, to show good cause for his failure to comply with the Court’s order and failure 

to prosecute his case. The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to respond to the show cause order

would result in this action being dismissed. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, 

responded to the show cause order, or otherwise taken any further action in this case. Therefore, 

the undersigned magistrate judge will recommend that this case be dismissed. Upon consideration,

8:23-cv-00226-JFB-MDN Doc # 20 Filed: 11/07/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 96
2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED to the Honorable Judge Joseph F. Bataillon, Senior 

United States District Court Judge, that the above-captioned case be dismissed without prejudice

for failure to comply with the Court’s order and failure to prosecute.

Dated this 7

th day of November, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/Michael D. Nelson 

United States Magistrate Judge 

ADMONITION

A party may object to a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation by filing an 

objection within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the findings and 

recommendation. NECivR 72.2. Failure to timely object may constitute a waiver of any objection.

8:23-cv-00226-JFB-MDN Doc # 20 Filed: 11/07/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 97
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens 'n Things, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Norman
Axelrod, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William T. Giles, as
Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



    /s/ Norman Axelrod
-----------------------------
NAME:   Norman Axelrod
TITLE:  Chairman and Chief
        Executive Officer
DATE:   May 12, 2005



    /s/ William T. Giles
-----------------------------
NAME:   William T. Giles
TITLE:  Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer
DATE:   May 12, 2005



                                       24
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board Group of Advisors. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Board concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VIII of Public Law 102-183, as amended.

# DATES:

September 23, 2008 (0800-1200).

# ADDRESSES:

Liaison Capital Hill,415 New Jersey Ave,  NW.,  Washington, DC 20001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Kevin Gormley, Program Officer, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. Electronic mail address:                         *Gormleyk@ndu.edu.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Security Education Board Group of Advisors meeting is open to the public. The public is afforded the opportunity to submit written statements associated with NSEP.

Dated: September 9, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E8-21702 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1786-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1786-DR), dated September 2, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date*: September 11, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 2, 2008.

Calcasieu Parish for Individual Assistance (already designated for emergency protective measures (Category B), including direct Federal assistance under the Public Assistance program).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-21967 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 99.1



                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence A.
Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
------------------------
Laurence A. Schiffer
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002



                                     19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. _06-cr-079-01-PB

Dorothy Collins

O R D E R

Defendant moves to reduce her sentence (document no. 119)

based on a change in the criminal history guideline in the

November 1, 2007 edition of the United States Sentencing

Commission Guidelines Manual. For the reasons stated below, the

motion to reduce sentence is DENIED.

On February 7, 2007, the defendant pled guilty to a three

count Superseding Indictment charging her with Interference with

Commerce Threats or Violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

1951(a); Possession of a Firearm with an Obliterated Serial

Number, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(k); and, Possession of a

Firearm by a Convicted Felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). 

On March 6, 2008, she filed a motion requesting a sentence

reduction based on a change in the criminal history guideline in

the November 1, 2007 edition of the United States Sentencing

Commission Guidelines Manual.

Case 1:06-cr-00079-PB Document 122 Filed 04/23/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The changes to the criminal history guidelines were not made

retroactive and are not listed in USSG §1B1.10(c). USSG

§1B1.10(a)(2) notes a reduction in the defendant’s term of

imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and,

therefore, is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) if none of

the amendments listed in (c) are applicable to the defendant.

Therefore, no reduction is warranted in this case. 

Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s motion to

reduce sentence (document no. 119) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 23, 2008 /s/ Paul J. Barbadoro 

Paul J. Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Dorothy Collins, pro se

Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cr-00079-PB Document 122 Filed 04/23/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-284-01-SM

Robert Cennami

O R D E R

Defendant Cennami’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 24). Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2007

trial period. Defendant Cennami shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than June 4, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. No further continuances absent extraordinary circumstances.

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: July 24, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: August 7, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00284-PB Document 25 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 22, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Clyde R.W. Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00284-PB Document 25 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 2
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 8, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2046 Lower Tribunal No. 07-4899

________________ 

### Arnold Maya , Appellant,
vs. 

### Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc. , Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for MiamiDade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge. Arnold Maya, in proper person. Lapin & Leichtling, LLP and Jan Timothy Williams (Jacksonville) and Adam B. Leichtling, for appellee. Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,130]


Sea Gull Lighting Products LLC, Riverside, NJ; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application submitted via facsimile on August 28, 2008, a 
petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative 
determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade 
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. 
The determination was issued on July 28, 2008. The Notice of 
Determination was published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2008 
(73 FR 46924).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of residential lighting fixtures did 
not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm 
and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information pertaining to the imports of lighting fixtures 
and the impact it has on subject firm production.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of September 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-21842 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,383-02

EX PARTE JUAN ORTIZ, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 18-08-137-CRW-A IN THE 81ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM WILSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to thirty-five years’

imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal. Ortiz v. State, No. 14-19-00481-

CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 27, 2019) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

In a single ground, Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal because trial

counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. On January 29, 2020, we remanded this application

and directed the trial court to order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. On remand, the

trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, but nothing in the supplemental record
2

indicates that trial counsel was ordered to respond. Accordingly, the trial court shall order trial

counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use anymeans

set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained on

remand, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

Afterreviewing trial counsel’s response, the trial court shall make furtherfindings of fact and

conclusions of law as to whether Applicant was denied his right to an appeal because trial counsel

failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions

that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 15, 2020

Do not publish