alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS
 (Dollar amounts in thousands)
 (Unaudited)
 Six Months EndedJune 30,
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31,2006(1)
    
    
    2005(1)
    
    
    2005(1)
    
    
    2004(1)
    
    
    2003(1)
    
    
    2002(1)
    
    
    2001(1)Earnings from operations
    
    $
    100,425
    
    
    $
    34,316
    
    
    $
    137,354
    
    
    $
    112,949
    
    
    $
    114,906
    
    
    $
    119,860
    
    
    $
    99,887Add:Interest expense
    
    
    118,831
    
    
    
    79,904
    
    
    
    178,551
    
    
    
    139,836
    
    
    
    116,569
    
    
    
    117,228
    
    
    
    55,261Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    219,256
    
    
    $
    114,220
    
    
    $
    315,905
    
    
    $
    252,785
    
    
    $
    231,475
    
    
    $
    237,088
    
    
    $
    155,148Combined fixed charges and Preferred Unit distributions:Interest expense
    
    $
    118,831
    
    
    $
    79,904
    
    
    $
    178,551
    
    
    $
    139,836
    
    
    $
    116,569
    
    
    $
    117,228
    
    
    $
    55,261Capitalized interest
    
    
    26,308
    
    
    
    17,482
    
    
    
    39,111
    
    
    
    23,572
    
    
    
    26,854
    
    
    
    32,377
    
    
    
    29,186Total fixed charges
    
    
    145,139
    
    
    
    97,386
    
    
    
    217,662
    
    
    
    163,408
    
    
    $
    143,423
    
    
    $
    149,605
    
    
    $
    84,447Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    1,915
    
    
    
    2,656
    
    
    
    4,572
    
    
    
    16,254
    
    
    
    26,153
    
    
    
    34,309
    
    
    
    25,877Combined fixed charges and Preferred Unit distributions
    
    $
    147,054
    
    
    $
    100,042
    
    
    $
    222,234
    
    
    $
    179,662
    
    
    $
    169,576
    
    
    $
    183,914
    
    
    $
    110,324Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.4
 
 (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified for all periods
presented.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

JP Morgan Chase Bank

v. Civil No. 06-cv-168-JD

Transunion Title & Escrow

Services, et al.

RECUSAL ORDER

A conflict has recently developed in this case requiring my

disqualification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4). Therefore,

the clerk shall assign this case to another judge.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

October 25, 2006

cc: John R. Grieme, squire

Gregory A. Moffett, Esquire

Veronica Caballero Viveiros, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00168-SM Document 13 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 1
Fritz v. Daly et al Doc. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

IMS Health Incorporated, et al. 

v. Case No. 06-cv-280-PB 

N.H. Attorney General 

O R D E R 

 The plaintiffs in this case join in requesting the entry of 

a final judgment reflecting their agreement that the Supreme 

Court’s recent decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 131 S. 

Ct. 2653 (2011) requires “invalidation of N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 

§§ 318:47-f and 318-B:12 to the extent that they prohibit the 

transfer, use, sale, or licensing of prescriber-identifiable 

data.” Doc. No. 173, ¶ 3. Plaintiffs have also agreed to waive 

any claim to attorney’s fees, expenses, or costs. Id. ¶ 2. 

 The parties’ proposal is consistent with my reading of 

Sorrell and is a reasonable way to resolve the matter. I cannot 

grant their joint request, however, because the First Circuit 

Court of Appeals has retained jurisdiction over the case. 

Accordingly, I deny the motion for entry of default judgment 

(Doc. No. 173) without prejudice. The parties may renew their 

request if the court of appeals should decide to remand the 

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 174 Filed 09/21/11 Page 1 of 2
2 

matter to the district court for further proceedings in light of 

the Supreme Court’s decision in Sorrell. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 /s/Paul Barbadoro 

 Paul Barbadoro 

 United States District Judge 

September 21, 2011 

cc: Counsel of Record 

Case 1:06-cv-00280-PB Document 174 Filed 09/21/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W. Gilluly, Chief Executive Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the "Company")
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

         1.       the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.



May 17, 2004                                 /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D. Chief
                                             Executive Officer
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60699 Conference Calendar

JOHN M. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WINSTON COUNTY JAIL; MIKE ESTES, Sheriff, Winston County, Mississippi; JOHNNY HOLDINESS, Deputy Sheriff, Winston County, Mississippi, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96-CV-359-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** John M. Jackson, Mississippi prisoner # 78478, appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit, alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. Jackson has failed to set forth any specific facts that would show how the lack of orthopedic treatment during theNo. 97-60699 -2- relatively brief period of time he was in the appellees’ custody over the course of one night was characterized by deliberate indifference. See Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss. , 74 F.3d 633, 639 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc); Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 840-41 (1994) The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED. Jackson’s motions for the appointment of counsel and for oral argument are DENIED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with PVC Container Corporation (the "Company") Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: May 16, 2005

                                    /s/ William J. Bergen
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Name: William J. Bergen
                                    Title: President & Chief Executive Officer

                                    /s/ Jeffrey Shapiro
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Jeffrey Shapiro
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

                                    Page 26
Exhibit 98
                                   ----------



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          The undersigned, Albert F. Buzzetti and Michael Lesler hereby jointly
          certify as follows:

          (a)  They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
               Officer, respectively, of Bridge View Bancorp (the "Company");

          (b)  To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on
               Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report")
               complies in all material respects with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

          (c)  To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the
               Report, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company



                                          /s/  Albert F. Buzzetti
                                          ______________________________
                                          Albert F. Buzzetti
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

                                          Date:  November 14, 2002



                                          /s/  Michael Lesler
                                          ______________________________
                                          Michael Lesler
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          Date:   November 14, 2002
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated August 23, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 442 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-231496) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


August 23, 2019
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cash technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the
period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, respectfully, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: October
15, 2003



|/s/ Bruce Korman        |  | /s/ Edmund
King        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. ANDERSON POST HARDWOOD LUMBER CO., Inc., v. BULLOCK, Clerk of Court, et al.

No. 1822.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1938.

Woosley & Cavanaugh, of Leesville, for applicant.

*639PER CURIAM.

The application seeks to have this court compel the clerk of the district court of Vernon parish, and the judge thereof, to furnish a court stenographer to take the testimony in this case or provide some other method of taking the testimony when the case is called for trial.

This application for the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction is not in aid of the appellate jurisdiction of this court. The matter over which we are asked to exercise supervisory jurisdiction pertains to the trial of the case, and not an appeal to this court. In fact, no appeal has as yet been asked for by the applicant, nor is it at all certain that it will ask for such appeal, as the applicant may not need nor require any appeal after the case is tried and decided.

Courts of Appeal are vested with supervisory jurisdiction over district courts, and may control them only to the extent of compelling them to perform such' functions as are necessary to enable litigants to take and perfect their appeals. Putnam & Norman, Inc. v. Levee, 179 La. 180, 153 So. 685; State ex rel. Perron v. Fruge et al., La.App., 173 So. 575.

For these reasons, the application ' for alternative writs of mandamus is hereby refused.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7324

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ALOYSIUS JAMEGO BER MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred 

William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, 

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

McLaughlin, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9 (D.S.C., Aug. 6, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,885                   8,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,567                  20,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,551                   2,294
<INVENTORY>                                      8,241                   5,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,870                  34,387
<PP&E>                                         402,677                 231,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                 202,353                 108,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,325                 164,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,469                  28,784
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           181                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,794                  24,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,233                  24,158
<SALES>                                         21,215                  14,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,684                  85,050
<CGS>                                           11,602                   8,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,731                  40,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   368                     283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,566                   6,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,531                  10,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,570                   2,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,961                   8,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,961                   8,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72                     .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72                    0.53  
        

</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1290

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make such title

fully applicable to the judicial branch of the Federal Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois (for himself, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. HASTINGS

of Florida, and Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to

make such title fully applicable to the judicial branch

of the Federal Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judicial Branch Em5 ployment Nondiscrimination Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 717(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

8 U.S.C. 2000e–16(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘those units
2

•HR 1290 IH

1 of the judicial branch having positions in the competitive

2 service’’ and inserting ‘‘the judicial branch’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         376,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               376,518
<PP&E>                                      13,362,010
<DEPRECIATION>                               (113,251)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,625,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          393,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,231,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,625,277
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               679,092
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  239,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                439,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            439,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   439,572
<EPS-BASIC>                                      25.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    25.43



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.2

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE



                                             Three Months    Nine Months
                                                Ended          Ended
                                            September 30,   September 30,
                                                1997            1997
                                            -------------   -------------
Shares

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                         3,948,703        3,948,703
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
  Stock options and warrants                   260,215          231,634

Weighted average shares outstanding          4,208,918        4,180,337
                                            ==========       ==========

Net income                                  $  828,000       $2,913,000
                                            ==========       ==========

Primary earnings per share                  $     0.20       $     0.70
                                            ==========       ==========
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6934

OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REBECCA A. NITKIN; THE LAW OFFICES OF FUTROVSKY, FORSTER & 

SCHERR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03199-TDC)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Osbaldo Lemus Berrios, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6934 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Osbaldo Lemus Berrios appeals the district court’s order dismissing Berrios’ civil 

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Berrios v. Nitkin, 

No. 8:20-cv-03199-TDC (D. Md. May 12, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6934 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2