alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 26th meeting of the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.). 

# DATES:

October 30, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. [Eastern]. 

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing gaps in adoption among providers. 

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​ehr_​instruct.html*.                 

Dated: September 12, 2008. 

Judith Sparrow, 

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. E8-22028 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,583,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  801,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                   345,433
<INVENTORY>                                    163,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,322,138
<PP&E>                                         758,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 433,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,764,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,380
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,510,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,764,240
<SALES>                                        950,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               950,561
<CGS>                                          611,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  611,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,772,184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (147,789)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,235,236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,235,236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,235,236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,383-02

EX P ARTE JUAN ORTIZ, JR ., Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 18-08-137-C RW-A IN THE 81ST DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM WILSON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of burg lary of a habit at i o n and sentenc ed to thirty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. The Four

th Court of Appea ls dismiss ed his appea l. Ortiz v. State , No. 14-19-00481- CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 27, 2019) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. I n a single g round, Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to an appea l beca use trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. On J anuar y 29, 2020, we rema

nded this application and directed the trial court to order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s c laim. On remand, the trial court made finding s of fac t and conclusion s o f law, but nothing in the supplemental rec ord2

indicates that trial counsel was order ed to respond. Acc ording ly , the trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). Applicant appea rs to be repr esente d by counsel. I f he is not and the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f cou n s el is appointed or reta ined on

rema nd, the trial cour

t shall imm ediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. After revie wing trial counsel’s response , the trial court shall make further finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to w hether Applicant wa s denied his r ight to a n appea l be cause trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. The trial court may make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appropr iate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laim. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions o f law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motio n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: April 15, 2020 Do not publish
<PAGE>


                                                     EXHIBIT (15)




INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


Enserch Exploration, Inc.:

We  have  made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of
Enserch Exploration, Inc., and subsidiaries for the periods ended
June  30, 1997 and 1996, as indicated in our report dated  August
8,  1997;  because we did not perform an audit, we  expressed  no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included
in  your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1997, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements
No. 33-57715 and No. 33-60587 on Form S-8.

We  also  are  aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant  to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, is not considered a part of
the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant
or  a  report prepared or certified by an accountant  within  the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
August 8, 1997

















                               15
#### FONG SHEE, etc., Appellant, v. Edward W. CAHILL, as Commissioner of Immigration, etc., Appellee.

No. 8672.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1938.

*1014Stephen M. White, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and Robert L. McWilliams, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue as provided in rule 32.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup 
Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 21st meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: October 17, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest 
to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on how health information technology can provide the data needed for 
the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and 
others in the health care industry, automate the measurement and 
reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality 
measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can 
improve performance on those quality measures.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: September 12, 2008.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. E8-22029 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6137

In Re: KITTRELL BERNARD DECATOR; In Re: CRAIG LAMONT SCOTT, Petitioners.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-2289-S) Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: June 10, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kittrell Bernard Decator, Craig Lamont Scott, Petitioners Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kittrell Decator and Craig Scott have filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to overturn the district court’s dismissal of their civil tort complaint. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking prohibition or mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Decator and Scott have not made such a showing. Appellate review of the district court’s dismissal of their civil tort complaint could have been obtained by direct appeal. Accordingly, we deny their petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Archstone-Smith
Operating Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the Issuer), hereby
certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Periodic Report) of the
Issuer for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m(a)) and that the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Date: November 12, 2003

/S/ R. SCOT SELLERSR. Scot Sellers, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1499 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1499

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2001

                                Received

                             August 2, 2001

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to permit 
  individuals who graduated from a secondary school prior to 1998 and 
individuals who enroll in an institution of higher education more than 
3 years after graduating from a secondary school to participate in the 
  tuition assistance programs under such Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia College Access 
Act Technical Corrections Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. REVISIONS TO ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TUITION ASSISTANCE 
              UNDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS ACT.

    (a) Permitting Certain Individuals to Participate in Tuition 
Assistance Program.--
            (1) Individuals graduating from secondary school prior to 
        1998.--Section 3(c)(2)(B) of the District of Columbia College 
        Access Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-98; 113 Stat. 1325) is 
        amended by striking ``on or after January 1, 1998''.
            (2) Individuals enrolling more than 3 years after 
        graduating from secondary school.--Section 3(c)(2) of such Act 
        (Public Law 106-98; 113 Stat. 1325) is amended by striking 
        subparagraph (C).
    (b) Prohibiting Participation of Foreign Nationals.--Section 
3(c)(2) of such Act (Public Law 106-98; 113 Stat. 1325), as amended by 
subsection (a)(2), is amended by inserting after subparagraph (B) the 
following:
                    ``(C) meets the citizenship and immigration status 
                requirements described in section 484(a)(5) of the 
                Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(a)(5));''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Ex. 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United  States  Code,  as adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
EduLink,  Inc.  ("EduLink"),  that, to his  knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report of
EduLink on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in such report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operation of EduLink.  This
written  statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed  original of this  statement  has been
provided  to EduLink  and will be  retained  by  EduLink  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


   Date: November 1, 2006                     By:  /s/ Aleksandr Shvarts
                                              --------------------------

                                              ALEKSANDR SHVARTS
                                              Chief Executive Officer

   Date: November 1, 2006                     By:  /s/ Gennady Pomeranets
                                              ---------------------------

                                              GENNADY POMERANETS, CPA

                                              Chief Financial Officer
June 7, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MERCEDEZ LESHION JONES, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00630-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph P. Galibois

v. Civil No. 04-cv-444-JD

John Fisher

O R D E R

Joseph P. Galibois, proceeding pro se, moved for an

extension of time to file an amended complaint several months

after the deadline had passed. Galibois asserted that his motion

was delayed because discovery had extended beyond the deadline

due to delays caused by John Fisher. Fisher acknowledged the

discovery delays but objected to an extension of time on the

ground that no basis existed, based on the late discovery, to

amend the complaint. The magistrate judge denied the motion on

the grounds that it was late and Galibois had not shown any basis

for amendment. Galibois moves for reconsideration, arguing again

that Fisher’s discovery delays were the reason he did not move to

amend within the time allowed.

The more appropriate time to challenge the grounds for a

proposed amendment would be in an objection to a motion to amend. 

Because Fisher acknowledges that discovery was delayed, through

no fault of Galibois’s and without a motion to extend time for

discovery to be completed, the better course would be to allow

Case 1:04-cv-00444-JD Document 34 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Galibois to move to amend the complaint. The merits of such a

motion will be addressed when it is filed.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff’s motion for

reconsideration (document no. 32) is granted. The plaintiff is

given until January 5, 2007, to file a motion to amend the

complaint. No further extensions of time will be allowed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

December 21, 2006

cc: Brian J.S. Cullen, Esquire

John F. Galibois, pro se

Case 1:04-cv-00444-JD Document 34 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


August 9, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1958


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1958 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-231485 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


      Very truly yours,


 


      Advisors Asset Management, Inc.


 


 


      By                 /s/
ALEX R. MEITZNER                


Alex R. Meitzner


Senior Vice
President
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MPLC, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jay
      Wolf ,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Jay
      Wolf





Jay
      Wolf


Secretary
      and Chief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 132 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 132

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, as the ``Goro Hokama 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 620 
Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Goro Hokama Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Goro Hokama Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```