alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,231
<SECURITIES>                                    41,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,370
<PP&E>                                         134,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,065
<BONDS>                                         92,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,592
<SALES>                                         73,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,286
<CGS>                                           39,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,069
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,762)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linens ‘n ThingsCenter, Inc. for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Robert J. DiNicola, as Chief Executive Officer of Linens‘n Things Center, Inc., and Francis M.Rowan, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Linens‘n Things Center, Inc.
| /s/ Robert J. DiNicola |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
| **Name:**              | Robert J. DiNicola        |
| **Title:**             | Chairman and Chief        |
|                   | Executive Officer         |
| **Date:**              | May 15, 2007              |
| ** **             |                      |
| ** **             |                      |
| /s/ Francis M.  Rowan  |                      |
| **Name:**              | Francis M. Rowan          |
| **Title:**             | Senior Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer   |
| **Date:**              | May 15, 2007              |
|                        |                           |  |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc.. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       |  |                                                    
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Jack P. DeBoer                                 
|                       |  |                                                    
|                       |  | Jack P. DeBoer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.





---



##### 



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       |  |                                                                   
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Warren D. Fix                                                 
|                       |  |                                                                   
|                       |  | Warren D. Fix
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
#### GUARANTY DISCOUNT *&*COLLECTION CO., Inc., v. McCLURE.

No. 16545.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 23, 1937.

J. Rosenberg, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Maurice B. Gatlin, of New Orleans, for appellee.

McCALEB, Judge.

The plaintiff, alleging itself to he a domestic corporation doing business in the city of New Orleans, brought this suit, as assignee of Hurwitz-Mintz Furniture Company, against the defendant, James McClure, on an open account for goods sold and delivered, in the sum of $138.44.

The defendant appeared and excepted to the capacity of the plaintiff to bring the suit and to stand in judgment on the ground that it is not a legal corporation and had no actual existence. Reserving the benefit of the exception, in the event it was overruled, and in compliance with the law respecting procedure in the city court of New Orleans, defendant answered denying any indebtedness to the plaintiff and setting forth certain special defenses.

The exception was overruled by the trial court and it, after hearing the case on its merits, dismissed the plaintiff’s demand as of nonsuit. A new trial was refused, and the plaintiff has appealed from the adverse judgment.

Counsel for defendant-appellee urges here that the exception to the capacity of the plaintiff to sue and stand in judgment should have been sustained by the trial judge, inasmuch as plaintiff did not offer any evidence to prove its corporate existence after the question had been put at issue by the exception.

It is well settled that the defendant had the right to attack the legal existence of the plaintiff corporation, provided that this question was put at issue in limine, under article 333 of the Code of Practice. This point having been properly raised, it was then incumbent upon the plaintiff to make proper proof of its corporate existence. This it has failed to do. The Supreme Court has held, in Granite Insurance Company v. Pralon et al., 10 La.Ann. 22, that “in an action by a corporation, if its existence be put at issue, it must be proved.” To 'the same effect is the case of Mercantile Leaf Tobacco Company v. Garcia-Quartararo Company, Inc., et al., 17 La. App. 203, 134 So. 764, decided by this court. It is otherwise where the exception has not been filed in limine. See Dunlevy Packing Company v. Juderman, 1 La.App. 476, and Gillon v. Miller, IS La.App. 168, 130 So. 672.

The exception to the corporate capacity of the plaintiff should have been sustained by the trial judge, and, in finding that he erred in this respect, it is therefore unnecessary for us to consider the case on its merits. However, -the judgment nonsuiting plaintiff’s claim is correct.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Case 1:04-cv-00368-SM Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 1 of 5Case 1:04-cv-00368-SM Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 2 of 5Case 1:04-cv-00368-SM Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 3 of 5Case 1:04-cv-00368-SM Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 4 of 5Case 1:04-cv-00368-SM Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 5 of 5
#### SWIFT & CO. FERTILIZER WORKS v. HARRIS et al.

No. 16272.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 4, 1935.

Cabral, Lenfant & Villere, of New Orleans, for appellant Florence Harvey Harris.

Charles F. Fletchinger, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal of Florence Harvey Harris. The suit is one by the employer to adjust compensation, and Florence Harvey Harris is one of the claimants. From a judgment below the said claimant and others appealed.

Motion of this appellant for appeal was granted in open court on August 2, 1935. The appeal was made returnable to this court on August 26, 1935. No appeal bond, was required in the order and none has been filed. No transcript was filed here until September 28, 1935. On that day a transcript of appeal was lodged apparently in connection with the appeal of other appellants.

Obviously, the appeal of Florence Harvey Harris must be dismissed, since she filed no appeal bond and since no transcript was lodged until more than a month after the return day.

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal of Florence Harvey Harris be, and it is, dismissed at her cost.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      184,363
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          56,675
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        12,484
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,522
<COMMON>                                         1,244
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       37,546
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             42,415
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  81,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,400
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            70,485
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              32,310
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,654
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  59,468
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  253,522
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       59,200
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,246
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      18,407
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,653
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          6,214
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 157
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   6,371
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,934
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,437
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        139
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,298
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,194
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,490
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            (18)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.46
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Air Force Department

# ACTION:

Notice.

Authority:Title 10, United States Code, Section 2869(d)(1).

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies excess Federal property under the administrative jurisdiction of the United States Air Force that the Air Force intends to exchange for military construction beneficial to the Air Force.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Sam Rupe, Office of the Air Force General Counsel (SAF/GCN-RPO), 143 Billy Mitchell Blvd., Suite 1, San Antonio, TX 78226-1816; telephone (210) 925-0227, (this telephone number is not toll-free).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2869(d)(1), the Air Force is publishing this Notice to identify Federal real property that the Air Force intends to dispose of in exchange for military construction beneficial to the Air Force.

*Description of the Air Force property:*

Former Lynn Haven Defense Fuel Depot, Lynn Haven, FL.

*Property Number:*

*Status:*                     Excess.                

*Comments:*                     Fuel operations at the Fuel Depot ceased in 1992, and the property has undergone considerable environmental remediation. The property proposed for exchange is approximately 144 acres of real property located off West 10th Street, Lynn Haven, FL 32444. About 50 acres is a railway right-of-way extending about 3.7 miles that intersects several major arterial roads.                

*Military construction sought:*

After completion of a competitive bid process, the Air Force will enter into an agreement with the selected offeror/property recipient to construct military construction projects at Tyndall Air Force Base, FL. The specific projects that will be constructed will depend on the amount of construction value offered by the prospective property recipient.

Bao-Anh Trinh,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-21833 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-100-JD

HemCon, Inc.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

For the life of United States Patent No. 6,864,245 (“the

‘245 patent”) HemCon, Inc., its officers, agents, servants,

employees, attorneys, successors in interest, assigns, and all

other persons in active concert or participation with them,

including without limitation, HemCon’s distributors, are enjoined

from infringing asserted claims 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 17, and 20 of

the ‘245 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell,

distributing, or importing into the United States HEMCON® BANDAGE

(4" x 4", 2" x 2", and 2" x 4"), CHITOFLEXTM Dressings, HEMCON®

DENTAL DRESSINGS (10mm x 12mm and 1" x 3"), and any other

Case 1:06-cv-00100-JD Document 439 Filed 09/16/10 Page 1 of 2
products which are no more than colorably different from these

infringing products.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

September 16, 2010

cc: Julie M. Baher, Esquire

Celine Jimenez Crowson, Esquire

Raymond A. Kurz, Esquire

Elizabeth Maher Leonard, Esquire

Lynda Q. Nguyen, Esquire

Keith B. O’Doherty, Esquire

Rebekah L. Osborn, Esquire

Brian M. Poissant, Esquire

Ognian V. Shentov, Esquire

Jonathan M. Shirley, Esquire

Daniel E. Will, Esquire

Leigh S. Willey, Esquire 

2

Case 1:06-cv-00100-JD Document 439 Filed 09/16/10 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with 37 CFR Part 404.6, announcement is made of the availability for U.S. licensing of  Patent No. US 7,419,122 entitled “Combined Skirt-Reefing and Slider                               ( print page 54391)                            Method for Controlling Parachute Opening” issued September 2, 2008. This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Jeffrey DiTullio at U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone; (508) 233-4184 or                         *e-mail: Jeffrey.Ditullio@us.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-21924 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40854

Conference Calendar

 

DAVID PARDUE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

N.L. CONNER, Warden, Federal 

Correctional Institution, Texarkana,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:98-CV-153

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Pardue, federal prisoner #04062-010, appeals the

dismissal without prejudice of his habeas corpus petition for

lack of jurisdiction. Pardue filed his petition under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. However, Pardue is challenging the legality of his

conviction and sentence, rather than the execution of his

sentence. The district court properly construed Pardue’s

petition as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence 
No. 98-40854

-2-

under § 2255. Solsona v. Warden, F.C.I., 821 F.2d 1129, 1131-32

(5th Cir. 1987). 

Pardue filed his § 2255 motion in the district court for the

Eastern District of Texas. He was sentenced, however, in the

district court for the Western District of Arkansas. Thus, the

only court with jurisdiction to entertain Pardue’s motion is the

district court for the Western District of Arkansas. See Ojo v.

I.N.S., 106 F.3d 680, 683 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court

did not err by dismissing without prejudice Pardue’s § 2255

motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Solsona, 821 F.2d at 1132. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          94,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,459,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                   911,099
<INVENTORY>                                 14,453,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,296,736
<PP&E>                                      77,435,742
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,918,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,790,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,556,837
<BONDS>                                     43,926,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,387
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,236,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,790,516
<SALES>                                     20,925,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,939,623
<CGS>                                       16,546,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,596,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             624,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (280,985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   112,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (168,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (168,585)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>