alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Covance Inc. (“Covance”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph L. Herring, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Covance.
| Date:  | August 2, 2006 |   |                          |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                |   |                          |
|   |                |   | /s/ Joseph L. Herring         |
|   |                |   | Joseph L. Herring             |
|   |                |   | Chairman of the Board and     |
|   |                |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |                |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         13,392
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,545
<PP&E>                                      1,696,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                110,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,769,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,234
<BONDS>                                       604,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    899,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,769,597
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               78,144
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            20,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (586)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.37
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended  (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2008-0276.                 

*Date Filed:*                     September 4, 2008.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     PTC COMP Mail Vote 575 Amending Composite Resolutions (Memo 1477).  Intended effective date: 1 April 2009.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E8-21818 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### KOND v. ROYAL INDEMNITY CO.

No. 2759.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1946.

For prior opinion, see 23 So.2d 798.

Samuel M. Robertson, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Loret, Percy & Bailey, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An application for a rehearing was filed in this case on December 1, 1945. Counsel for the appellee have filed an opposition to the application on the ground that it comes too late. The envelope containing the application and addressed to the clerk of this court shows that it was post marked at 9 P.M. on November 30th, which clearly indicates that the letter containing the application could not have reached the office of the clerk of this court before the following day, December 1st, the day on which the application was filed. Notice of the opinion and decree of this court was received by counsel for the plaintiff on November 16th.

Act 16 of 1910 provides that judgments of the courts of appeal shall become final and executory on the fifteenth calendar day after rendition (after service of notice under the Constitution), unless the last day shall fall on a legal holiday.

December 1st was the fifteenth calendar day after November 16th,. the day on which notice was received. The judgment of this court had become final when the application was filed on December 1st. The last day for filing the application was November 30th, which was not a legal holiday. The situation is the same as it was in the case of Murray v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., 184 So. 413. Following our ruling in that case, we are .compelled to refuse consideration of the present application as having been filed too late.
#### STATE ex rel. BOONE v. GRAY, Secretary of State.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 1, 1936.

Boone & Boone, of Miami, for relator.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell and John L. Graham, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The relator’s “petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus requiring the Respond*612ent to recall from the Board of County-Commissioners from the several Counties, the statement that Relator's campaign expense statement was not received and filed within the period required by statute and that said Secretary of State, the Respondent herein, should be required to immediately notify all County Commissioners of the several counties that your Relator was properly qualified and his name should be printed upon the official ballot of the primary election for August 11, 1936,” is denied. There is no showing of a legal duty of the respondent secretary of state to perform the acts stated in the prayer of the petition for an alternative writ of mandamus.

Petition denied.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and TERRELL, BROWN, and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
Presidential Documents

54055 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 181 

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–27 of September 12, 2008 

Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the 

Trading With the Enemy Act 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury 

Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95–223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. App. 

5(b) note), and a previous determination on September 13, 2007 (72 FR 

53409), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading With the Enemy 

Act is scheduled to terminate on September 14, 2008. 

I hereby determine that the continuation for 1 year of the exercise of those 

authorities with respect to Cuba is in the national interest of the United 

States. 

Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me by section 101(b) 

of Public Law 95–223, I continue for 1 year, until September 14, 2009, 

the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba as implemented by 

the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515. 

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this 

determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 12, 2008 

[FR Doc. E8–21861 

Filed 9–16–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4811–33–M 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K andall reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust2018-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliancereview conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance describedin such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date:    June 27, 2019 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. Cullum
President and Chief Executive Officer of

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

(senior officer in charge ofthe

servicing function)
**
October 25, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ENRIQUE TORRES, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00649-CV V.

FIESTA MART, LLC F/K/A FIESTA MART, INC., Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on July 19, 2016. Having considered the motion and found 

it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Enrique Torres.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
{C0135297.2 }

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

In re: Koji Goto * 

 Debtor * BK Case No.: 04-13739 JMD 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chapter: 11 

Steven M. Notinger, as Chapter 11 Trustee, * 

Steven M. Notinger as Managing Member of * 

Epic Investment Capital, LLC; and Steven M. * 

Notinger, as Managing Member of * 

J.H. Business Services, LLC, * Adv. Proc. No.: 05-1051-JMD 

 Plaintiffs * 

v. * 

 * 

Nirma Hill and Enjesa Corporation, * 

 Defendants * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE AND FOR 

ASSIGNMENT TO FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT 

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Withdrawal of Reference and for 

Assignment to Federal District Court and accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ordered 

that the reference of this matter to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New 

Hampshire be withdrawn, and that this matter be assigned for all further proceedings, 

including trial, to a judge of this court. 

Date: December 2, 2005 ______/s/ Steven J. McAuliffe_____________________ 

 United States Federal District Court Judge 

Case 1:05-cv-00407-SM Document 3 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,647,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    283,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,095,328
<PP&E>                                         575,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,578,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,813
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,225,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,578,738
<SALES>                                        282,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               282,038
<CGS>                                          103,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,361,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (120,663)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,062,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,062,923)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,062,923)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,289
<INVENTORY>                                    122,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,051
<PP&E>                                         506,498
<DEPRECIATION>                               (257,004)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,096,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,809
<OTHER-SE>                                     277,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,096,125
<SALES>                                        660,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               663,528
<CGS>                                          303,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  428,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               194,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,021
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,709
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        

</TABLE>
Rodriquez v. US Drug Enforcement Administration Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-64-01-SM

Dennis B. Hammons

O R D E R

Defendant Hammons’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 9). Trial has been rescheduled for the November 

2006 trial period. Defendant Bennett shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than September 7, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: October 30, 2006 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: November 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00064-SM Document 10 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

August 29, 2006

cc: David W. Ruoff, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00064-SM Document 10 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

TROY R. FINLEY,

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MICHEAL MYERS,

Respondent.

8:23CV224

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On June 16, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to update his address with the 

Court within 30 days or face dismissal of this action. Filing No. 8. To date, Plaintiff has 

not updated his address or taken any other action in this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice 

because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this Court’s 

orders. The Court will enter judgment by a separate document.

Dated this 24th day of July, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00224-JFB-PRSE Doc # 11 Filed: 07/24/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 28
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138

To amend section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide

that no permit shall be required for animal feeding operations within

the boundaries of a State if the State has established and is implementing a nutrient management program for those animal feeding operations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 2001

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself and Mrs. EMERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide that no permit shall be required

for animal feeding operations within the boundaries of

a State if the State has established and is implementing

a nutrient management program for those animal feeding

operations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by adding at the end

5 the following:
2

•HR 1138 IH

1 ‘‘(q) EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN ANIMAL FEEDING OP2 ERATIONS.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a State has established

4 and is implementing a nutrient management pro5 gram for animal feeding operations that meets the

6 requirements of paragraph (2), no permit shall be

7 required under this section with respect to such op8 erations within the boundaries of the State.

9 ‘‘(2) SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS.—A nutrient

10 management program for animal feeding operations

11 referred to in paragraph (1) must meet the following

12 requirements:

13 ‘‘(A) The program must be designed so

14 that application of the program to such oper15 ations will assist the State in achieving its

16 water quality goals.

17 ‘‘(B) The program must include guidelines

18 to restrict the discharge of pollutants so as not

19 to compromise water quality.

20 ‘‘(C) The program must include nutrient

21 management planning guidelines for such oper22 ations.

23 ‘‘(3) ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION.—In this

24 subsection, the term ‘animal feeding operation’

25 means a lot or facility where animals have been, are,
3

•HR 1138 IH

1 or will be stabled or confined and fed or maintained

2 for a total of 45 days or more in any 12-month pe3 riod and crops, forage, or post-harvest residues are

4 not sustained in the normal growing season over any

5 portion of the lot or facility.’’.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135403 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135403 

 COA: 279114

 Oakland CC: 92-121606-FC 

 92-121607-FC; 92-121608-FC 

 92-121934-FC; 92-121935-FC 

 92-121936-FC; 92-121937-FC 

 92-121938-FC; 92-121941-FC 

HOWARD JAY KAPLAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk