alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 12/31/95
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          71,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,019,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,300
<INVENTORY>                                    747,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,965,000
<PP&E>                                       2,658,100
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,286,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,805,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,864,900
<BONDS>                                      1,586,800
<COMMON>                                        11,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          336,900
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     602,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,805,600
<SALES>                                      1,654,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,654,900
<CGS>                                          944,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  944,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               456,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                204,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            128,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   128,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<FN>
<F1>LOSS-PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSE ABOVE.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RESTATED
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED 12/31/97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         113,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  922,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                    558,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,690,800
<PP&E>                                       2,224,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,064,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,075,500<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,374,000<F2>
<BONDS>                                      1,825,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          277,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,745,900<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,075,500<F2>
<SALES>                                      1,317,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,317,100
<CGS>                                          648,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  648,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               419,300<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203,300<F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,600<F2>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            139,700<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                  15,700
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   860,500<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.37<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.83<F2>
<FN>
<F1>LOSS-PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSES ABOVE
<F2>AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED DUE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOP 98-1
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
     Commercial and Industrial Companies
     Article 5 of Regulation S-X
    (In thousands except per share data)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          15,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    225,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,346
<PP&E>                                         197,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 444,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           386
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   444,644
<SALES>                                        590,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               590,873
<CGS>                                          360,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        


</TABLE>
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1374

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake

Linden, Michigan, as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe PostOffice Building’’.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1374

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,

as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1374 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 600 Calumet Street in Lake Linden, Michigan,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Philip E. Ruppe Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |   |                                  |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   |   |   | /s/ Jeffrey H. Coats                  |   |
|   |   |   |   | Jeffrey H. Coats                      |   |
|   |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   |   | August 13, 2010                       |   |

|   |   |   |   |                                              |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   | /s/ Curtis E. DeWalt                              |   |
|   |   |   |   | Curtis E. DeWalt                                  |   |
|   |   |   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |   |   | August 13, 2010                                   |   |
Case: 12-01120-JMD  Doc #: 1-1  Filed: 11/29/12  Desc:  Exhibit A  Page 1 of 3

Case: 12-01120-JMD  Doc #: 1-1  Filed: 11/29/12  Desc:  Exhibit A  Page 2 of 3

Case: 12-01120-JMD  Doc #: 1-1  Filed: 11/29/12  Desc:  Exhibit A  Page 3 of 3
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2010


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: July 7, 2010
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### TAMBURELLO v. HEREFORD et ux.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 26, 1954.

Rosin .& Paderewski, Sarasota, for appellant.

Edwin ■ J. Kennedy, Sarasota, for ap-pellees.

MATHEWS, Justice.

Appellant became a lessee under agreement with the appellees as lessors. Although the lease was to run only a few months during the year, its terms were reduced to writing. In an action for breach of the lease the lessee filed an answer and a counterclaim alleging that the lessors never tendered the described premises and attached to her answer a copy of the original lease agreement wherein the property was described as: “the dwelling at 378 Floyd Avenue — furnished completely as is — and the east half of the garage. The lessor is to install two gas heaters.” A trial resulted in a verdict of $1,500 for the ap-pellees. A motion for new trial was made and denied. Final judgment was entered thereon and it is from this final judgment that this appeal is prosecuted.

The real question which was submitted to the jury is, was the phrase, “two gas heaters to be installed”, ambiguous where it appears in the description of the premises to be leased and was it error to submit the meaning thereof to the jury? The trial Court held, that parol testimony was admissible to show when the heaters were to be installed. Such an instruction was given to the jury by the Court "without objection from anyone.

The only ambiguity involved was the fact that thé written agreement did not contain any date when the heaters were to be installed. No complaint was made by the appellant concerning said heaters or the time when they were to be installed until after this litigation was -in progress. On her testimony .the appellant testified, “Well, the reason I didn’t move in because I was displeased with the utility room not being there.” This is the first time her displeasure about the utility room appears.in the record. With reference to the two gas heaters, appellant .testified as follows:

> “Q. Did she say anything to you that the heaters would be put in when you took possession? A. No, she said they would put them in as soon as possible.

> * * * . * * *

> “Q. And you understood that the ■heaters could not be installed until' November; is that correct? A. Some time in November.”

It may be that the written instrument was susceptible of the interpretation by the Court that the gas heaters would be installed as soon as practical or at least before *546the winter season began. Having submitted this question to the jury under the above-quoted testimony of the lessee, she suffered no harm because the question was submitted to the jury, or by reason of the interpretation and finding of the jury. The record fails to show any reversible error.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

DALONTE D FOARD,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TODD BAHENSKY, Director; D. WINKLER, 

Correction Officer; HOBBS, Correction 

Officer; and BEAVERNESS, Correction 

Officer;

Defendants.

8:23CV217

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On June 9, 2023, the Clerk of 

the Court sent an order, Filing No. 9, to Plaintiff’s last known address as set forth in his 

Complaint, Filing No. 1, which was returned to this Court as undeliverable on June 16, 

2023, Filing No. 10. Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current 

address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to 

local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be 

prosecuted in this Court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE 

ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result 

in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 

8:23-cv-00217-JFB-PRSE Doc # 11 Filed: 06/29/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 65
2

2 The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and 

Order to both Plaintiff’s last known address listed in the Complaint, Filing No. 1, and to 

Plaintiff at USP-LEAVENWORTH, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 1000 Leavenworth, KS 

66048, where Plaintiff is believed to be currently housed.

1

3. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to set a pro se case management 

deadline in this case using the following text: July 31, 2023: check for address.

Dated this 29th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Court

1 See Case Number 8:20-CR-333, Filing No. 245, listing Foard’s address as of June 20, 2023.

8:23-cv-00217-JFB-PRSE Doc # 11 Filed: 06/29/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 66
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1458

To limit the exceptions to certain ‘‘Buy American’’ requirements, and to

expand such requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. HAYES (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. DEMINT, and Mr. MCINTYRE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Armed Services

A BILL

To limit the exceptions to certain ‘‘Buy American’’

requirements, and to expand such requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXCEPTIONS TO BUY AMER4 ICAN REQUIREMENTS; EXPANSION OF RE5 QUIREMENTS.

6 Section 9005 of the Department of Defense Appro7 priations Act, 1993 (10 U.S.C. 2241 note) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘shall determine’’ and all that

9 follows through ‘‘emergency procurements or’’ and

10 inserting ‘‘submits a certification to the Committees
2

•HR 1458 IH

1 on Armed Services and Subcommittees on Defense

2 of the Committees on Appropriations of the House

3 of Representatives and the Senate that (1) satisfac4 tory quality and sufficient quantity of a covered arti5 cle or item cannot be procured as and when needed

6 from suppliers which grow, reprocess, reuse, or

7 produce such articles or items in the United States

8 or its possessions, (2) an emergency exists and the

9 procurement is vital to national security, and the ar10 ticle or item to be procured is grown, reprocessed,

11 reused, or produced in a country that adheres to fair

12 labor practices (i.e., no labor practices involving

13 forced, slave, or child labor, or any other adverse

14 labor practice) as determined by the Department of

15 State and except’’; and

16 (2) by inserting after ‘‘Provided,’’ the following:

17 ‘‘That in determining whether a purchase is for an

18 amount greater than the simplified acquisition

19 threshold for purposes of this section, multiple pur20 chases of a similar item in any fiscal year shall be

21 deemed to be a single purchase: Provided further,

22 That no procurement may be made by the Defense

23 Commissary Agency of any article or item described

24 in this section for purchases for amounts greater

25 than the simplified acquisition threshold covered by
3

•HR 1458 IH

1 section 2304(g) of title 10, United States Code, ex2 cept under the conditions described in this section:

3 Provided further,’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. Civil No. 06-cv-293-SM

Charles Ward, et al.

O R D E R

Pro se plaintiff William J. Carey has filed a complaint,

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants have

abridged his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to

the United States Constitution by denying him adequate medical

and dental care (document no. 2). Named as defendants are the

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections (“HCDOC”) and three

HCDOC employees: Dr. Charles Ward; LPN Denise Hartley; and an

unnamed dentist.

The complaint is before me for preliminary review to

determine whether, among other things, it states a claim upon

which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; U.S.

District Court for the District of New Hampshire Local Rule

(“LR”) 4.3(d)(2). For the reasons stated in the report and

recommendation issued simultaneously herewith, I conclude that

Case 1:06-cv-00293-SM Document 8 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 3
2

Carey has alleged cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against

Hartley and Ward based on the denial of adequate medical care. I 

recommend dismissal of all remaining claims. I further recommend

that Carey’s motion for alternative service (document no. 6) be

granted.

Accordingly, I order that the complaint be served on the

defendants. As plaintiff has filed the necessary summons forms

with regard to defendants Ward and Hartley, I order that the

complaint be served on those defendants. The Clerk’s office is

directed to issue the necessary summons forms and forward to the

United States Marshal for the District of New Hampshire (the

“U.S. Marshal’s office”) the summonses, copies of the complaint

(document no. 2), the report and recommendation and this order. 

Upon receipt of the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s

office shall effect service upon defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

4(c)(2). 

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

Case 1:06-cv-00293-SM Document 8 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 3
3

their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 2, 2006

cc: William J. Carey, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00293-SM Document 8 Filed 11/02/06 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-42-01-SM

Thomas Lavery

O R D E R

Defendant Lavery’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 34). It is perhaps past the time in which the parties

ought to consider seeking a transfer of this case to the district in which the

defendant lives for disposition, rather than seek additional continuances due to

defendant's apparent inability to procure his own transportation from the west

coast. Since the defendant is in financially difficult circumstances, and there

appears to be no reason to burden the government with transportation costs when

another district can easily handle the matter, disposition in another district seems

like an attractive alternative for all concerned. 

 Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2007 trial period. Defendant 

Lavery shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than July 18, 2007. 

On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 35 Filed 07/03/07 Page 1 of 2
2

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Change of Plea: September 4, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Jury Selection: October 10, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

July 3, 2007

cc: Lawrence Vogelman, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 35 Filed 07/03/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 35.15  LOGO 2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123) Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) dated as of December 1, 2018 by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization, Corp. as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator and as Trustee, relating to the UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
2018-C14, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2018-C14 (UBS 2018-C14) The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the Special Servicer) herein certifies to the
following:  1.
All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.
A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
December 12, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.  3.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:

/s/ Adam Singer



Date: March 1 , 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director