alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1209

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 7, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to determine

whether an alien is a child, for purposes of classification

as an immediate relative, based on the age of the alien

on the date the classification petition with respect to

the alien is filed, and for other purposes.
2

HR 1209 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Status Protec5 tion Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. USE OF AGE ON PETITION FILING DATE, PARENT’S

7 NATURALIZATION DATE, OR MARRIAGE TER8 MINATION DATE, IN DETERMINING STATUS

9 AS A CHILD OF A CITIZEN.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 201 of the Immigration

11 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) is amended by add12 ing at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(f) RULES FOR DETERMINING WHETHER CERTAIN

14 ALIENS ARE IMMEDIATE RELATIVES.—

15 ‘‘(1) AGE ON PETITION FILING DATE.—Except

16 as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), for purposes

17 of subsection (b)(2)(A)(i), a determination of wheth18 er an alien satisfies the age requirement in the mat19 ter preceding subparagraph (A) of section 101(b)(1)

20 shall be made using the age of the alien on the date

21 on which the petition is filed with the Attorney Gen22 eral under section 204 to classify the alien as an im23 mediate relative under subsection (b)(2)(A)(i).

24 ‘‘(2) AGE ON PARENT’S NATURALIZATION

25 DATE.—In the case of a petition under section 204
3

HR 1209 RFS

1 initially filed for an alien child’s classification as a

2 family-sponsored immigrant under section

3 203(a)(2)(A), based on the child’s parent being law4 fully admitted for permanent residence, if the peti5 tion is later converted, due to the naturalization of

6 the parent, to a petition to classify the alien as an

7 immediate relative under subsection (b)(2)(A)(i), the

8 determination described in paragraph (1) shall be

9 made using the age of the alien on the date of the

10 parent’s naturalization.

11 ‘‘(3) AGE ON MARRIAGE TERMINATION DATE.—

12 In the case of a petition under section 204 initially

13 filed for an alien’s classification as a family-spon14 sored immigrant under section 203(a)(3), based on

15 the alien’s being a married son or daughter of a cit16 izen, if the petition is later converted, due to the

17 legal termination of the alien’s marriage, to a peti18 tion to classify the alien as an immediate relative

19 under subsection (b)(2)(A)(i), the determination de20 scribed in paragraph (1) shall be made using the age

21 of the alien on the date of the termination of the

22 marriage.’’.

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

24 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact25 ment of this Act and shall apply to all petitions and appli-
4

HR 1209 RFS

1 cations pending before the Department of Justice or the

2 Department of State on or after such date.

Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### Packer’s Estate

(No. 4).

Argued April 3, 1914.

Appeals, Nos. 102 and 103, Jan. T., 1914, by the Borough Council of the Borough of Mauch Chunk and the Board of School Directors of the Borough of Mauch Chunk, from decree of O. C., Philadelphia Co., April T., 1881, No. 323, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in estate of Asa Packer, deceased.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Potter, Elkin and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to adjudication. Before Gtjmmey, J.

The facts appear in Packer’s Est. (No. 1), 246 Pa. 97.

The court dismissed. the exceptions. The Borough Council of the Borough of Mauch Chunk and the Board of School Directors of the Borough of Mauch Chunk, legatees under the will of Mary Packer Cummings, appealed.

*132
      *Error assigned*was the decree of the court.

*A. E. Wintersteen,*for appellants.

*W. U. Hensel, for*Ruth M. Linderman, executrix of the estate of Robert P. Linderman, deceased, Ruth Evelyn Linderman, Mary Evelyn Linderman, Evelyn Linderman, Christine Linderman and Robert Packer Linderman, Jr., Warren A. Wilbur, executor of the estate of Sallie Linderman Wilbur, deceased, and Robert E. Wilbur, appellees.

W. *W. Montgomery, Jr.,*and *Joseph Hill Brinton,*filed a paper book for the executors and legatees of John E. Rathbun, appellees.

*J. Davis Brodhead*filed a paper book for the executors of the estates of E. P. Wilbur, W. W. Wilbur, Helena Rathbun and Hattie Pitch, deceased, appellees.

July 1, 1914:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moschzisker,

The interest of the present appellants is fully stated in Packer Est. (No. 1). All the questions here involved are based upon the assumption that the trusts under the will of Asa Packer will continue for twenty-one years after the death of Mary Packer Cummings, which occurred October 29,1912; but since we have construed the will to the contrary and decided that the trusts in question terminated upon the death of Mary Packer Cummings [See, Packer’s Est. (No. 1) ], it is not necessary to consider the various points attempted to be raised by the several assignments of error.

The appeal is dismissed; the costs to be paid by the appellants and others as ordered by the Orphans’ Court when the record is returned to it.
Order entered February 15, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01181 - CV JAMES H. GENTRY, Appellant

V. BENJAMIN N. SMITH, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Ju dicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 03888 - 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 13, 2019 motion for a paper copy of the clerk’s record

. Although appellant has previously been provided a copy of the eighty

- e ight

- page record and has acknowledged receipt, we GRANT the motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a paper copy of the clerk’s record to appellant. Appellant’s reply brief remains due March 15, 2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. 06-cr-208-03-JD

Jose Ambriz

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

75) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: November 9, 2007

cc: Sven Wiberg, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00208-JD Document 77 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James B. Currier

v. Civil No. 06-cv-328-PB

Hillsborough County Department

of Corrections, et al 

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated November 28, 2006, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

February 5, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: James B. Currier, pro se

Carolyn M. Kirby, Esq.

John A. Curran, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00328-PB Document 21 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 1
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-20-00187-CV 

 

KEVIN LAWSON BLAYDES, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 100th District Court 

 Hall County, Texas 

Trial Court Nos. 3914, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding 

January 5, 2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER, and DOSS, JJ. 

Kevin Lawson Blaydes appeals the trial court’s judgment adjudicating his guilt and 

convicting him of assaulting a peace officer. Upon accepting a guilty plea and following

a plea agreement, the trial court placed appellant on 5 year’s deferred adjudication 

probation. Subsequently, the State moved the trial court to adjudicate appellant’s guilt in 

the cause. After a hearing on the motion, the trial court found appellant violated various 

conditions of his probation, adjudicated him guilty, and sentenced him to fifteen years in 

prison. Appellant now appeals.
Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw together with an Anders1 brief.

Through those documents, she certifies to the Court that, after diligently searching the

record, the appeal is without merit. Accompanying the brief and motion is a copy of a

letter sent by counsel to appellant informing the latter of counsel's belief that there were

no arguable issues warranting an appeal and of appellant's right to file a pro se response

to counsel's Anders brief. So too did counsel provide appellant with a copy of the clerk's 

and reporter's records, according to the letter. By letter dated December 3, 2020, this 

Court notified appellant of his right to file his own brief or response by December 30, 2020, 

if he wished to do so. To date, no response has been received.

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel 

discussed potential areas for appeal. Those areas included 1) sufficiency of the evidence 

to support appellant’s probation violations and 2) disproportionate sentencing. However, 

she then explained why the issues lacked merit. 

We conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel's

conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403

(Tex. Crim. App. 2008), and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 508 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991) (en banc). No issues of arguable merit were uncovered, however. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed.2

Brian Quinn

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). 

2 Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1298

To provide for the expansion of human clinical trials qualifying for the

orphan drug credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself and Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To provide for the expansion of human clinical trials

qualifying for the orphan drug credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Orphan Drug Tax

5 Credit Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS QUALI7 FYING FOR ORPHAN DRUG CREDIT.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subclause (I) of section

9 45C(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is

10 amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 1298 IH

1 ‘‘(I) after the date that the appli2 cation is filed for designation under

3 such section 526, and’’.

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Clause (i) of sec5 tion 45C(b)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by inserting

6 ‘‘which is’’ before ‘‘being’’ and by inserting before the

7 comma at the end ‘‘and which is designated under section

8 526 of such Act’’.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this Act shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after the

11 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Case 1:06-cv-00006-SM Document 15 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 3Case 1:06-cv-00006-SM Document 15 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 3Case 1:06-cv-00006-SM Document 15 Filed 02/13/07 Page 3 of 3
EX-10.28



 Exhibit 10.28 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (“Second Amendment”) is made by and between the Regents of the University of New Mexico, a body corporate of
the State of New Mexico, as Landlord, and Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., as Tenant. 
 WHEREAS, in May 2013, Tenant entered into a Lease with
Landlord for space at 800 Bradbury Dr.SE known as Suite 108 (the “Lease”); 
 WHEREAS, in April 2014, Tenant entered into a First
Amendment to lease, exercising its First Option to extend the initial term of the Lease Agreement for six (6) additional months; and 

WHEREAS, Tenant now desires, and Landlord agrees, to extend the Lease Term by an additional six (6) months. 

NOW THEREFORE, Tenant and Landlord mutually agree and covenant as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 Landlord and Tenant agree to extend the Lease Term for six (6) months to commence December 1, 2014 and expire
on May 31, 2015. 


  

	 	2.	 The monthly rent amount shall remain, Four Thousand Two Hundred and Five Dollars and Thirty-four cents
($4,205.34). 


  

	 	3.	 All capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this Second Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them
in the Lease. 










	 	4.	 Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force
and effect. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.

  

			
	LANDLORD: The Regents of the University of New Mexico
		
		 	/s/ David W. Harris
	By:	 	David W. Harris
	Its:	 	EVP for Administration, COO & CFO


  

			
		 	/s/ Bruce Cherrin
	By:	 	Bruce Cherrin
	Its:	 	Chief Procurement Officer


  

			
	TENANT: Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.,
		
		 	/s/ Wendy Swedick
	By:	 	Wendy Swedick
	Its:	 	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer



  
 2
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of WISEMAN GLOBAL LIMITED (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), The undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the
    annual report on Form 10-K of Wiseman Global Limited for the period ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of Wiseman Global Limited                                                           



| | Dated:
    August 4, 2020                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                             
| | /s/
    Lai Jinpeng                                                                         
| | Lai
    Jinpeng                                                                             
| | Director,
    Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer                   
| | (Principal
    Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Wiseman Global Limited and will be retained by Wiseman Global Limited and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States 

v. Case No. 06-cr-166-01-SM

Antron Hughes

ORDER

Re: Document No. 28, Motion to Appoint Counsel (re: Crack

Cocaine Amendment)

Ruling: Denied. Defendant, by letter, seeks to have his

sentence reduced based upon the United States Sentencing

Commission’s retroactive amendment of the “crack” cocaine guideline

(Amendments 706 and 711, effective March 3, 2008). Defendant’s

guideline sentencing range was based upon his career offender

status, and was not based on a sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered (i.e. the retroactive “crack” amendment),

therefore his sentence cannot be reduced on that ground. See

United States v. Ayala-Pizarro, 551 F.3d 84 (1st cir. 2008); United

States v. Caraballo, 552 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2008). The court notes

that defendant was sentenced well below the advisory guideline

range based on his motion for a variant non-guideline sentence, and

a further reduction would not be appropriate even if the

retroactive amendment applied here. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: April 6, 2009

cc: Antron Hughes, pro se

Bjorn Lange, Esq. 

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

Case 1:06-cr-00166-SM Document 30 Filed 04/06/09 Page 1 of 1
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7052 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, as the ‘‘1st 

Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2022 

Mr. VELA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, as the ‘‘1st Lieutenant Andres Zermeno 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT ANDRES ZERMENO POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1535 East Los Ebanos Boule7 vard in Brownsville, Texas, shall be known and designated 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7052 IH

1 as the ‘‘1st Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘1st Lieutenant Andres 

7 Zermeno Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
H. R. 132

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 620 Jacaranda

Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Goro Hokama Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

620 Jacaranda Street in Lanai City, Hawaii, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Goro Hokama Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Goro Hokama

Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the ServicingAgreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2018-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 24, 2018 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and amongNissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust, NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2020. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,155
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,825
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         50
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,495
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,508
<LOANS>                                         94,350
<ALLOWANCE>                                        329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,032
<DEPOSITS>                                      91,589
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                632
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 108,032
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,752
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  256
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   117
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,126
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,881
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,116
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,009
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       46
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    667
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       420
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                        850
<LOANS-PAST>                                       338
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      100
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  329
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               329
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>