IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

MARVEL JONES,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MADISON COUNTY, A Political Subdivision; 

STATE OF NEBRASKA, NEBRASKA 

STATE PATROL, A State Agency; 

MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT, The Chief Law Inforcement 

Officer of Madison County; SIX UNKNOWN 

SHERIFF OFFICERS OF MADISON 

COUNTY, NEBRASKA, Sued In Their 

Individually And In Their Official Capacity; 

MICHAEL GETTMANN, LICSW/LIMHP, 

Sued In His Individually And In His Official 

Capacity; and SEN. ROBERT ROSE, of Law 

Enforcement and Public Safety for the 

Nebraska State Patrol Sued In His 

Individually And In His Official Capacity;

Defendants.

8:23CV182

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion in Paying Filing Fee” docketed 

as a letter. Filing No. 11. As he indicates in his letter, on August 3, 2023, Plaintiff, a nonprisoner,1 paid the filing fee in this case. At the direction of the Court, this case is removed 

from the pro se docket. See General Order No. 2022-04, ¶ 4. The Clerk’s office shall 

assign new judges to this case and request a reassignment order from the Chief Judge. 

1 Plaintiff is a “civilly committed patient” at the Norfolk Regional Center. Filing No. 1 at 1. Thus, Plaintiff is 

not a “prisoner” within the meaning of the PLRA. See Reed v. Clarke, No. 4:04CV3168, 2005 WL 1075092, 

at *1 n.1 (D. Neb. May 5, 2005) (“The plaintiff is presently in the Lincoln Regional Center pursuant to a 

mental health commitment. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (‘PLRA’) does not apply to persons in custody 

pursuant to the Mental Health Commitment Act, as the definition of ‘prisoner’ in the PLRA does not include 

a person involuntarily committed for reasons of mental health.”) (citing Kolocotronis v. Morgan, 247 F.3d 

726, 728 (8th Cir.2001)).

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 12 Filed: 09/01/23 Page 1 of 4 - Page ID # 90
2

As this case is being reassigned, the undersigned will make no ruling on Plaintiff’s 

pending motion for the appointment of counsel, Filing No. 2, at this time. 

Because Plaintiff is a pro se non-prisoner who has paid the filing fee in full, the 

Court will direct the Clerk’s office to provide Plaintiff with summons forms so that Plaintiff 

may effect service of process. Plaintiff may request the Court to “order that service be 

made by a United States marshal” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), but 

Plaintiff should be aware that the U.S. Marshals Service is required by statute to charge 

him for making or attempting service. See 28 U.S.C. § 1921(a) (“The United States 

marshals or deputy marshals shall routinely collect, and a court may tax as costs, fees 

for” serving summonses, complaints, or any other process.). The Court also advises 

Plaintiff that under 28 U.S.C. § 1921(d), the U.S. Marshals Service “may require a deposit 

to cover the fees and expenses prescribed” under § 1921; the remainder of the fees and 

expenses will either be collected by the Marshals Service or taxed as costs by the Court, 

28 U.S.C. § 1921(a)(1).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. The filing fee has been paid in this case. At the direction of the Court, this 

case is removed from the pro se docket. The Clerk’s office shall assign new judges to 

this case and request a reassignment order from Chief Judge Rossiter.

2. The Clerk of Court shall send ten signed summons forms and ten USM-285 

forms to Plaintiff together with a copy of this Memorandum and Order for service on each 

of the named defendants, including those defendants sued in both their individual and 

official capacities. 

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 12 Filed: 09/01/23 Page 2 of 4 - Page ID # 91
3

3. Plaintiff may request the Court to order that service be made by the United 

States Marshals Service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3). However, as to 

the defendant stylized as “Six Unknown Sheriff Officers of Madison County, Nebraska,” 

Plaintiff is advised that the United States Marshals cannot initiate service upon unknown

defendants. Thus, Plaintiff must take reasonable steps to identify the “Six Unknown 

Sheriff Officers of Madison County, Nebraska” and notify the Court of the defendants’ 

names or inform the Court if he is unable to provide any identifying information if he 

wishes the Marshals Service to effect service on these defendants.

4. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the complaint on a 

defendant within 90 days of filing the complaint. However, Plaintiff is granted, on the 

Court’s own motion, an extension of time until 90 days from the date of this order to 

complete service of process. The Clerk of Court shall set a case management deadline 

accordingly.

5. Plaintiff is hereby notified that failure to obtain service of process on the 

Defendants within 90 days of the date of this order may result in dismissal of this matter 

without further notice. A defendant has 21 days after receipt of the summons to answer 

or otherwise respond to a complaint.

6. The parties are bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by the 

Local Rules of this Court. Plaintiff shall keep the Court informed of his current address at 

all times while this case is pending. Failure to do so may result in dismissal without further 

notice.

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 12 Filed: 09/01/23 Page 3 of 4 - Page ID # 92
4

Dated this 1st day of September, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 12 Filed: 09/01/23 Page 4 of 4 - Page ID # 93