alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1351

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for Government furnished

headstones or markers for the marked graves of veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. QUINN, Mr. FILNER, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. HILL, Mr. PETRI, Mr. LUTHER,

Mr. FOLEY, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. BARCIA, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. OLVER,

Mr. HORN, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr.

FOSSELLA, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. BOEHLERT, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.

LAFALCE, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr.

LAMPSON, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. CAMP, Mr. BALDACCI, Mr.

SHIMKUS, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. WYNN, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. FRANK, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. DAVIS of

Illinois, Mr. COYNE, Ms. MCKINNEY, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr.

LARSON of Connecticut, Mrs. THURMAN, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr.

MCNULTY, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. DEAL of

Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for Government furnished headstones or markers for the marked

graves of veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1351 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF GOVERNMENT HEADSTONES

2 FOR MARKED GRAVES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2306(a) of title 38,

4 United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding

5 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘appropriate Government

6 headstones or markers at the expense of the United States

7 for the unmarked graves of the following:’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘one appropriate Government headstone or marker at the

9 expense of the United States, other than for replacement,

10 to mark the grave of the following:’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) applies with respect to applications for Gov13 ernment headstones or markers received by the Secretary

14 of Veterans Affairs for individuals dying on or after No15 vember 1, 1990.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Juan Acosta

v. Case No. 06-cv-471-PB

NH State Prison

O R D E R

The petitioner has failed to amend his petition in compliance with Magistrate Judge

James Muirhead’s Order dated January 4, 2007, accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

February 9, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Juan Acosta, Pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00471-PB Document 7 Filed 02/09/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1183 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1183

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 113 South Main Street in Sylvania, Georgia, as the ``G. Elliot Hagan 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 113 
South Main Street in Sylvania, Georgia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``G. Elliot Hagan Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``G. Elliot Hagan Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-143-PB

Juan Soto-Mejia

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the January 9, 2007 

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

finalize a negotiated plea agreement. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, to allow the parties additional time to

finalize the plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from March 6, 2007 to May 1, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00143-PB Document 14 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The February 22, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 18, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 21, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Robert Veiga, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00143-PB Document 14 Filed 02/21/07 Page 2 of 2
#### William Wesley GRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 16, 1954.

Harry P. Johnson, Tavares, for appellant.

*514Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Mark R. Hawes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and we are convinced that the questions raised were answered in Mercer v. State, 83 Fla. 555, 92 So. 535 and Driggers v. State, 90 Fla. 324, 105 So. 841. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed on authority of these two casesi

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7038

JOE LEE FULGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (DOC) MENTAL AND MEDICAL DOCTORS; OBIC HOSPITAL SUFFOLK, VA; TIDEWATER MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00089-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C § 1983 (2006) action for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fulgham v. The Commonwealth of Virginia Mental and Med. Doctors , No. 2:09-cv-00089-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2009). We deny Fulgham’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August August 8, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 5 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Wireless Industrial Technology Konsortium Inc.  (“WITK”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Airsprite Technologies, Inc., Marlborough, MA; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX; Pepperl + Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim, GERMANY; Emerson Process Management LLLP, Eden Prairie, MN; Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG, Reinach, SWITZERLAND; Software Technologies Group, Westchester, IL; Siemens AG, Karisruhe, GERMANY; and ABE Automation Products GmbH, Alzenau, GERMANY.

The general areas of WITK's planned activity are to develop, implement, promote and distribute on a nonprofit basis one or more software communication stacks and supporting products, the first of which will be the WirelessHART Specification (HART 7) published by the HART Communication Foundation, and to encourage the use of such communications stacks and products on a standardized basis within, for example, the process control and factory automation communities worldwide, provided, however, WITK shall not carry on any activity not permitted to be carried on by a corporation that is exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of the Code as an organization described in Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E8-21742 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI, Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer

    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer
    August 14, 2003


                                     21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

GORDON C. REID

v. MISC. No. 06-44S

WARREN F . DOWALIBY,

Superintendent, Strafford County

Department of Corrections, et als.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Gordon C. Reid, is a federal pretrial detainee placed at the Strafford County

Department of Corrections (the "SCDOC") in Dover, New Hampshire . On May 12, 2006, Plaintiff

filed a Complaint against several employees of the SCDOC and the U.S. Marshal for the District of

New Hampshire pursuant to 42 U.S .C. § 1983 challenging his conditions of confinement and

claiming denial of access to law materials . He also filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

("IFP") and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). His IFP Motion was granted by

the District of New Hampshire and then this matter was transferred to the District of Rhode Island

because of the recusal of all of the New Hampshire Judges.

On June 2, 2006, this Court ordered that the U.S . Marshal Service serve Defendants with a

copy of Plaintiffs Complaint and Temporary Restraining Order . See Document No. 12. The

Marshal Service subsequently served the Defendants on or about June 5, 2006 and filed copies of

the returns of service with the Court. See Document No. 15. Currently before the Court is

Plaintiff s Motion for Service of Process filed August 23, 2006 . (Document No. 30). The Motion

has been referred for determination. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); LR Cv 72(a). In the Motion,

Plaintiff states, "To date, to Plaintiffs knowledge, nearly 90 days after the commencement of this

action service of process has not been initiated ." See Document No. 30, ¶ 3. As noted, the Returns

Case 1:06-cv-00182-SM Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
of Service were filed with this Court in June, and each of the returns indicate that it was served on

June 5, 2006 . Therefore, service of process has been completed, and Plaintiff s Motion is DENIED

as moot.

ENTER: PER ORDER:

/s/ Lincoln D. Almond

LINCOLN D . ALMOND

United States Magistrate Judge

September 13, 2006

Is/ Jeannine Theall

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:06-cv-00182-SM Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-118-01-PB

Evane Eustaquio Alves Duarte

The defendant has moved to continue the August 15, 2006 trial in the above case. 

Defendant cites the need for additional time to negotiate the details of a possible plea agreement or,

alternatively, to investigate facts and prepare for trial. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time to negotiate a plea agreement, or

properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from August 15, 2006 to November 7,

2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that

for the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00118-PB Document 11 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 8, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued until October 23, 2006 at 4:45

PM.

SO ORDERED.

August 9, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Mark Zuckerman, Esq.

Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

U. S. Probation

U. S. Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00118-PB Document 11 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Electronic Health 
Records Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 26th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.).

DATES: October 30, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest 
to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing 
gaps in adoption among providers.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/ehr_instruct.html.

    Dated: September 12, 2008.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. E8-22028 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
Exhibit 3



                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                      OF
                           PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1996-4


               THIS Certificate of Trust of Premier Auto Trust 1996-4 (the
"Trust"), dated August 16, 1996, is being duly executed and filed by Chase
Manhattan Bank Delaware, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a
business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del.C. ss. 3801 et
seq.).


               1.     Name: The name of the business trust formed hereby is
Premier Auto Trust 1996-4.


               2.     Delaware Trustee: The name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank
Delaware, 1201 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate
Trustee Administration Department.


               3.     Effective Date: This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.


               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of
the Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above
written.



                                            CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE, not
                                            in its individual capacity but
                                            solely as Owner Trustee under the
                                            Trust Agreement dated as of August
                                            16, 1996


                                            By: /s/ J. J. Cashin
                                              ----------------------
                                            Name:  JOHN J. CASHIN
                                            Title: SENIOR TRUST OFFICER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-181-01-SM

John Teves

O R D E R

Defendant Teves’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 23). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2007 trial

period. Defendant Teves shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

November 6, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: February 26, 2007 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: March 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 24 Filed 10/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 27, 2006

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq.

Joseph Laplante, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00181-SM Document 24 Filed 10/27/06 Page 2 of 2
U.S. DISIR ;C T 'CU nT

DISTRICT OF N .H . FILE D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUF&T

R

qi 5 25 PM '06

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE L

IN THE MATTER OF

HONG TANG

O R D E R

By letter dated April 12, 2006, the petitioner seeks special

admission to the bar of this court, pursuant to LR 83 .1(c) . A motion

should have been filed, but the court will treat the letter as a

motion . The materials filed by petitioner in support of his motion

suggest no special circumstances warranting excusal of the usual

admissions requirements set out in LR 83 .1, nor is any pressing need

for a special admission disclosed . It is not even apparent that

petitioner has been admitted to the practice of law by the highest

court of any state or the District of Columbia . And, petitioner does

not seem to be involved in pending litigation in this court, a

circumstance that might warrant pro hac vice admission .

The motion for special admission to the bar of this court is

necessarily denied as there are no special circumstances justifying an

exception to the usual admissions process, which petitioner is, of

course, free to pursue .

SO ORDERED .

teven J .'McAuliff e

Chief Judg e

April 25, 200 6

cc : Hong Tang, 820 Talisman Dr ., Palo Alto, CA 94303

Case 1:06-cv-00202-SM Document 2 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 1
Case: 13-12337-BAH Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/24/13 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54853-54854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Extension of Concession Contracts

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2009.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that 
the National Park Service proposes to extend the following expiring 
concession contract for a period of 1 year or until such time as a new 
contract is executed, whichever occurs sooner.

[[Page 54854]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listed concession authorization will 
expire by its terms on or before December 31, 2008. The National Park 
Service has determined that the proposed extension is necessary in 
order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all 
reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such 
interruption.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Conc ID number            Concessioner name         Park
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC-NACCOO4-89...................  Landmark Services   National Capital
                                   Tourmobile, Inc.    Parks--Central
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program 
Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 202/
513-7156.

    Dated: September 21, 2008.
Katherine H. Stevenson,
Assistant Director, Business Services.
[FR Doc. E8-22079 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-M