alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In Re: Frederick Eichhorn

Case No. 12-13476-BAH

Chapter 13

Debtor 2018 HAY-2 AMI0S28

CLERK OF THE

TRUSTEE'S AFFIDAVIT OF UNCUIMED FINRRRUPTCY C&ffiT

DISTRICT SF NH

I, LAWRENCE P. SUMSKI, Chapter 13 Trustee, being duly

sworn, do solemnly swear on my oath and say:

1. That certain disbursements authorized by the Court

have been unable to be consummated in the above-cited

Chapter 13 case, and the case is otherwise ready to be

closed.

2. That pursuant to § 347(a) and Rule 3011 I have now

cancelled a disbursement check, to wit:

Check #216750

Issued on: 12/20/2017

Issued to: Frederick Eichhorn

108 Oakcrest Lane

Gilmanton, NH 03237

In the amount of $915.73

3. That the original, now cancelled check was sent to

the debtor via his attorney, Kevin Chisholm at 195 Elm

Street, Manchester, NH 03101 with a copy of the

correspondence being sent contemporaneously to the debtor at

the address listed above.

4. That attached is my replacement check number 219593

in the amount of $915.73, payable to the Clerk of Court, and

these should be considered unclaimed funds.

I hereby certify the above-cited information to be true

to the best of my knowledge.

Dated: April 30, 2018

ectfu^y-submi

Lawrence P. Sumski,

Chapter 13 Trustee

1000 Elm Street

Suite 1002

Manchester, NH 03101

(603) 626-8899

ID# BNH01460

Case: 12-13476-BAH Doc #: 101 Filed: 05/02/18 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 2
On this the 30^^ day of April, 2018 before me,

personally appeared Lawrence P. Sumski satisfactorily proven

to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within

instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same

voluntarily and for the purposes therein contained.

Before me,

mOo

'ary Public

I : I

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this, the 30^^ day of April,

2018, a copy of the foregoing Affidavit of Unclaimed Funds

was forwarded, by first class mail to Frederick Eichhorn at

108 Oakcrest Lane, Gilmanton, NH 03237, Debtor's Attorney,

and the Office of the U.S. Trustee.

Dated: April 30, 2018 /s/ Lawrence P. Sumskj

Lawrence P. Sumski

i/

Case: 12-13476-BAH Doc #: 101 Filed: 05/02/18 Desc: Main Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Darren Starr

v. Civil No. 05-cv-368-JD

Major Dennis Cox, et al.

O R D E R

 Plaintiff moves to compel production of a videotape of an

alleged violation of the prison Tai Chi policies on July 3, 2006

by inmate Christopher Kennard and the disciplinary or incident

report and reports or statements related thereto. 

By letter of 6 July 2006, these discovery requests were made

to defense counsel. The letter was received on 10 July 2006 by

counsel. On the 10th or 11th counsel conveyed the request to the

Warden orally. The letter request was not forwarded to the

Warden by mail or by fax. It is clear from counsel’s statements

and the Warden’s testimony that the request was not communicated

as one for a video taken within two days of July 5th, but of an

earlier video in the spring of 2006. A fair and thorough reading

of the letter makes it clear that the request relates to the July

2006 event. The miscommunication was a result of inadvertent

negligence either by counsel, the Warden or both. It was not

Case 1:05-cv-00368-JD Document 43 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 3
2

intentional. 

By the date of receipt of the plaintiff’s second letter of

13 July 2006 to counsel, clarifying the name of the complaining

officer, Kennard had been exonerated of the charge. 

Unfortunately, since no action was taken by the prison to

preserve the tape it was reused and taped over on or after July

18th and the evidence was lost. 

The video may well have provided evidence of appropriate Tai

Chi practice of a prisoner after his “education” by new policy

and an earlier disciplinary for inappropriate prior practice by

the same prisoner. Defendant’s inadvertent negligence has

resulted in spoliation of evidence and an appropriate sanction is

as follows: 

If defendant introduces the video of Kennard used in

the preliminary injunction hearing, plaintiff is entitled to

admission into evidence of the following (and the jury or

judge informed that): 

Prisoner Kennard was videotaped on July 3, 2006

while engaged in Tai Chi exercises. He was charged

with “throwing punches . . . in violation of the Tai

Chi memorandum dated 5/27/05". Prisoner Kennard was

Case 1:05-cv-00368-JD Document 43 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 3
3

exonerated of the charge of “throwing punches” upon a

review of the videotape by the Hearing Officer. 

Plaintiff made a timely request on July 5th that the

tape be preserved for evidence. Defendant failed to

preserve the tape through inadvertence attributable to

a miscommunication between defense counsel and Warden

Blaisdell. 

The records responsive to requests #1 and #3, as redacted by

the court are ordered produced. 

Plaintiff is entitled to his costs of $20.00 which the

Warden is ordered to assure are deposited in his prisoner account

within ten (10) days. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 11, 2006

cc: Mary E. Maloney, Esq.

 Darren Starr, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00368-JD Document 43 Filed 10/11/06 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS).                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eugene R. Baizman, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1464,                         *eb237e@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy,Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 10, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-21630 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Skynet Corporation d/b/a

ZeroBrokerFees.com

v. Civil No. 06-cv-218-JM

New Hampshire Real Estate Commission, et al.

O R D E R

 Defendants move for a protective order:

A. That plaintiff is not permitted to depose the

defendants or a designated representative of the

Commission concerning how the Commission (1) interprets

the REPA; (2) applies the REPA to plaintiff or any

other individual or entity; (3) may rule in the

ISoldmyHouse.com matter currently pending before the

Commission or any other hypothetical fact pattern

concerning how the Commission may interpret or apply

the REPA. 

B. That the plaintiff is not permitted to depose

defendants or a designated representative of the

Commission concerning any decision which the Commission

has made in a judicial capacity.

Plaintiff objects. 

Case 1:06-cv-00218-JM Document 30 Filed 04/02/07 Page 1 of 3
2

Discussion

There is no doubt that the New Hampshire Real Estate

Commissioners do act as quasi-judicial decision-makers. “(T)he

Supreme Court long ago declared it ‘wholly improper’ to submit

the members of a state administrative board to an ‘elaborate

cross-examination with regard to the operation of their minds’. 

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. Babcock, 204 U.S. 585,

593 (1907).” Hoeft v. MVL Group, Inc., 343 F.3d 57, 67 (2nd Cir.

2003). In short inquiry cannot be made “regarding the thought

processes underlying their decisions.” Id. On the other hand,

employees or agent, even commissioners, are subject to discovery

of the existence of decisions, policies and practices. 

At this time, the parties have agreed to forego the

depositions of defendants Slattery, Heath, Stephen, Ikawa and

Leroy and proceed with only the deposition of a designated

representative. How the Commission interprets the Real Estate

Practices Act or its thought processes in applying it to specific

facts to reach a decision is not a subject for deposition but

what it has done, said, ordered or delegated is appropriate. 

The motion is granted in part and denied in part. Neither

party is entitled to the broad ruling each seeks. Plaintiff may

Case 1:06-cv-00218-JM Document 30 Filed 04/02/07 Page 2 of 3
3

take the deposition asking only those questions permitted by law

as I have suggested. Defense counsel may object and instruct the

witness not to answer as permitted by law and as suggested by

this order. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 2, 2007

cc: Valerie J. Bayham, Esq.

 Charles G. Douglas, III, Esq.

 James William Kennedy, Esq.

 Jason R.L. Major, Esq.

 William H. Mellor, Esq.

 Steven M. Simpson, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00218-JM Document 30 Filed 04/02/07 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Donald Koehler

v. No. 06-fp-36

State of New Hampshire, et al.

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-036-SM. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: February 21, 2006

cc: Donald Koehler, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00036-SM Document 6 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 1
exv10w15



 




Exhibit 10.15


OUTSIDE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION


Each outside director of CVB Financial Corporation will receive the following compensation on an
annual basis for their services as a director as of March 9, 2005:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Chairman of the Board

	 	$	124,200	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	All other outside directors

	 	$	43,464	 






These amounts are paid in equal monthly installments. In addition, the directors are eligible to
participate in the health plan of the Company and the Company pays a portion of that benefit
comparable to the other employees of the Company.



There is no additional compensation for the directors should they serve on a committee or chair a
committee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             590,692
<SECURITIES>                                       110,002
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,124,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,544,631
<INVENTORY>                                         46,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,377,376
<PP&E>                                             709,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                     430,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,685,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,626,197
<BONDS>                                            663,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          1,222
<COMMON>                                               726
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,394,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,685,838
<SALES>                                         11,751,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,751,082
<CGS>                                            8,673,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,673,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,598,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,192,337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    240,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                240,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       240,068
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.03



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       610
<INVENTORY>                                         91
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,101
<PP&E>                                           8,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,572
<SALES>                                         21,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,161
<CGS>                                            3,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                       456
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,659,148
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,673,066
<PP&E>                                         9,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,682,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,174,246
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       771,148
<OTHER-SE>                                     736,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,682,232
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               78,548 <F1>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,780,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             69,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,701,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,701,884)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>  Revenue represent interest income recorded in the nine month period.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,528] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on December 15, 2006, applicable to workers of Sherwood, Harsco GasServ, a subsidiary of Harsco Corporation, Niagara Falls, New York. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 27, 2006 (71 FR 77801).                 

At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in employment related to the production of precision valves used for gas and fluid control. 

New information shows that on December 7, 2007, Taylor-Wharton International purchased Sherwood, Harsco GasServ and is currently known as Sherwood Valve LLC. The workers' wages at the subject firm are being reported under a separate Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Sherwood Valve LLC. 

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,528 is hereby issued as follows: 

“All workers of Sherwood, Harsco GasServ, a subsidiary of Harsco Corporation, currently known as Sherwood Valve LLC, Niagara Falls, New York, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 4, 2005, through December 15, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.”

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of September 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-22120 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-156-02-PB

Rose Cote and Troy Cote

O R D E R

Defendants have each moved, through counsel, to continue the

May 1, 2007 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to engage in plea negotiations or prepare a

defense. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, to allow the parties additional time to 

properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial

from May 1, 2007 to June 5, 2007. In agreeing to continue the

trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A)

that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in

granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public

and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00156-PB Document 28 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 17, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to

May 24, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 17, 2007

cc: R. Brian Snow, Esq.

Tony Soltani, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00156-PB Document 28 Filed 04/17/07 Page 2 of 2