alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of November 28, 2018 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2018-4 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2020, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of May, 2020.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-192-PB

Joan Dibartolo

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the November 7, 2006

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete discovery and prepare a defense. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from November 7, 2006 to March 6, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00192-PB Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 30, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued 

until February 20, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 25, 2006

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00192-PB Document 16 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Alexander MEZHBEIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Diane K. BUTLER; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-56401.

D.C. No. CV-98-8165-DOC/MLG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 20, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Alexander Mezhbein appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendants, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action action, alleging that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs by refusing or delaying replacement of his dentures. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Frost v. Agnos,*152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because the evidence did not show a genuine issue of material fact as to whether any defendant denied or personally delayed Mezhbein’s access to dental care. *See McGuckin v. Smith,*974 F.2d 1050, 1062 (9th Cir.1992) (affirming summary judgment where there was no evidence defendants were directly responsible for hindering plaintiffs diagnostic examinations or surgery), *overruled on other grounds by WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller,*104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir.1997); *Taylor v. List,*880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.1989) (stating that section 1983 defendants must have personal involvement in the alleged violation).

The district court properly dismissed without prejudice the newly asserted claims raised in Mezhbein’s “Motion to Safeguard Prisoner’s Rights” because Mezhbein conceded that he had not exhausted administrative remedies. *See McKinney v. Carey,*311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1200 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).

*770The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Mezhbein’s request for appointment of counsel because he did not show exceptional circumstances. *See Terrell v. Brewer,*935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).

Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Mezhbein’s motions to compel discovery because the denial of discovery did not result in “actual and substantial prejudice.” *See Hallett v. Morgan,*296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir.2002) (citation omitted).

Mezhbein’s remaining contentions are also unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1434

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make permanent

the exclusion from gross income for amounts received under qualified

group legal services plans and to increase the maximum amount of

the exclusion.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. CAMP (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. GORDON,

Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, and Mr. LATOURETTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

and make permanent the exclusion from gross income

for amounts received under qualified group legal services

plans and to increase the maximum amount of the exclusion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1434 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER

2 QUALIFIED GROUP LEGAL SERVICES PLANS

3 RESTORED AND MADE PERMANENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 120 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read

6 as follows:

7 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section and

8 section 501(c)(20) shall apply to taxable years begin9 ning.—

10 ‘‘(1) after December 31, 1976, and before July

11 1, 1992, and

12 ‘‘(2) after December 31, 2001.’’

13 (b) INCREASE IN MAXIMUM EXCLUSION.—The last

14 sentence of section 120(a) of such Code is amended by

15 striking ‘‘$70’’ and inserting ‘‘$150’’.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

18 December 31, 2001.

Æ
# National POW/MIA Recognition Day, 2008

On National POW/MIA Recognition Day, we honor the brave and patriotic Americans who were held as prisoners of war, and we remember those who are still missing in action.  For their valor and selfless devotion to protect the country they love, our Nation owes them a debt we can never fully repay.  On this day we underscore our commitment and pledge to those who are still missing in action and to their families that we will not rest until we have achieved the fullest possible accounting for every member of our Armed Forces missing in the line of duty.

To observe this important day, the National League of Families POW/MIA flag is flown over the Capitol, the White House, the World War II Memorial, the Korean War Veterans Memorial, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, and other locations across our country.  The flag is a solemn reminder of our Nation's enduring obligation and promise to our courageous service members who remain missing and a tribute to those who have been imprisoned while serving their country in conflicts around the world.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 19, 2008, as National POW/MIA Recognition Day.  I call upon the people of the United States to join me in honoring and remembering all former American prisoners of war and those missing in action for their valiant service to our Nation.  I also call upon Federal, State, and local government officials and private organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E8-22181

Billing code 3195-01-P
[LETTERHEAD OF SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.]



GMAC-RFC
2255 N. Ontario Street, Ste 400
Burbank, CA  91504
Attention: Compliance Officer


        Re: Annual Compliance Statement for RAMP SERIES 2006-RS4 TRUST

        In connection  with the loans serviced by SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc. (the
"Company")  pursuant to the Company's Servicing  Agreement(s)/Purchase  and Sale
Agreement(s)  with  GMAC-RFC  and  any  applicable  Reconstitution  Agreement(s)
(together,  the "Transaction  Agreements"),  I, the undersigned officer,  hereby
certify the following as of December 31, 2006:

(i)  The Company  conducted a review of its  activities  during the  immediately
     preceding  calendar  year  (or  applicable  portion  thereof)  and  of  its
     performance  under the Transaction  Agreements  during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations  under the  Transaction  Agreements in all
     material  respects  throughout  such calendar year (or  applicable  portion
     thereof),  except  that as of  January 1, 2006,  the  Company  did not have
     procedures for monitoring  compliance with requirements as specified in the
     applicable transaction agreements governing SEC Regulation AB transactions.
     To address the absence of such  procedures,  the Company's  management  has
     undertaken and completed the following  actions:  (a) completed a review of
     each  Transaction  Agreement and identified if there was specific  language
     affecting any of the Servicing  Criteria  outlined in Section 1122;  (b) to
     the degree that the Transaction  Agreements  required  specific  procedures
     related to the servicing  criteria,  the Company's  Reference Point Library
     (where all  policies and  procedures  are  maintained)  was updated to this
     effect;  (c)  for  each  pool,  a  Control  Matrix  was  completed  (and is
     maintained on a current basis)  identifying  which  Transaction  Agreements
     control each pool;  and (d)  established a monthly review process where the
     Company's  managers  review key factors of  performance  under  Transaction
     Agreements and respond to a questionnaire  indicating  compliance with such
     factors.



        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I do hereby  certify the  foregoing as of the date
hereof.

        /s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.

        John R. Purcell, Jr.
        Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

        Date:  February 27, 2007
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-4018

___________ Leugene Cash Bettis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Teamsters Brewery Workers Pension * Plan, St. Louis, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 14, 1999 Filed: June 21, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Leugene Cash Bettis appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Bettis's action to recover pension benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. After careful review of the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude that no error of law appears in the district court's ruling and that an extended discussion is unnecessary. Contrary to Bettis's view, the record is clear that Bettis was not eligible for pension benefits under the St. Louis Teamsters Brewery Workers Pension Plan because she was not an employee of a participating union employer. We thus affirm the district court's ruling. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### SCHNEIDER v. LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO.

Motion No. -.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 28, 1938.

Arthur Frank, of New York City, for appellant.

Alexander & Green, of New York City, for respondent.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from a decree denying a bill of discovery in aid of the prosecution of an action for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., for the accidental death of appellant’s intestate. The papers on this motion consist of the record which would be before us on consideration of the appeal. They are the complaint in this equity action for a bill of discovery, the complaint in a common-law action, and interrogatories referred to in the appellant’s bill of discovery.

Upon examination of these papers and the affidavits we are of the opinion that the appeal is frivolous, and therefore the relief should be denied and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22040]



[[Page 54600]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis Meeting 
(ACET)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following council meeting.
    Times and Dates:
    8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., October 7, 2008.
    8:30 a.m.-2 p.m., October 8, 2008.
    Place: Corporate Square, Building 8, 1st Floor Conference Room, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone (404) 639-8317.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 100 people.
    Purpose: This council advises and makes recommendations to the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Assistant Secretary for 
Health, and the Director, CDC, regarding the elimination of 
tuberculosis. Specifically, the Council makes recommendations regarding 
policies, strategies, objectives, and priorities; addresses the 
development and application of new technologies; and reviews the extent 
to which progress has been made toward eliminating tuberculosis.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items include issues pertaining to 
update on nucleic acid amplification guidelines; update on interferon 
gamma release assays guidelines; update on the isolation guidelines; 
update on travel restrictions guidelines and other related tuberculosis 
issues.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Margie Scott-Cseh, 
Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Strategic Business Unit, 
1600 Clifton Road, NE., M/S E-07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone 
(404) 639-8317.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register Notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 15, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. E8-22040 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-190-PB

Carlos Perez

O R D E R

Upon motion by the defendant, to which the government does not object, the judgment

dated May 28, 2008 is hereby amended to include the following:

The Court recommends that the defendant participate in the

500-hour intensive drug education and treatment program.

SO ORDERED.

October 17 , 2008 _/s/ Paul Barbadoro__

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Robert J. Veiga, AUSA 

Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

U. S. Marshal

U. S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00190-PB Document 41 Filed 10/17/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dynamic Network Systems, Inc. ,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No .

Timothy Wilde,

Defendant

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7 .5

NOW COMES the Plaintiff Dynamic Network Services, Inc ., by and through its attorneys,

Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, Professional Association, and makes the following corporate

disclosure pursuant to Local Rule 7 .5 :

Dynamic Network Services, Inc . is a privately held corporation organized under the laws

of the State of Delaware, with a principal place of business in Manchester, New Hampshire .

Dynamic Network Services, Inc . has no parents, subsidiaries or affiliates and is not subject to any

merger agreement with any publicly held corporation .

Respectfully submitted ,

DYNAMIC NETWORK SERVICES, INC .

By Its Attorneys,

SHEEHAN PHINNEY BASS & GREEN,

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 2 Filed 02/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
Dated : February 1, 2006 By: Jsl Christopher Cole

Christopher Cole, NH Bar No. 8725

John-Mark Turner, NH Bar No. 15610

1000 Elm Street

P.O. Box 3701

Manchester, New Hampshire 03105-3701

(603) 627-8223

ccole@sheehan .com

jturner@sheehan .com

2

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 2 Filed 02/01/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1456 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1456

 To expand the boundary of the Booker T. Washington National Monument, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

  Mr. Goode (for himself, Mr. Schrock, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. 
Scott, Mr. Moran of Virginia, and Mr. Boucher) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the boundary of the Booker T. Washington National Monument, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Booker T. Washington National 
Monument Boundary Adjustment Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF BOOKER T. WASHINGTON NATIONAL MONUMENT EXPANDED.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of the 
Booker T. Washington National Monument'', approved April 2, 1956 (16 
U.S.C. 450ll et seq.), is amended by adding at the end the following 
new section:

``SEC. 5. ADDITIONAL LANDS.

    ``(a) Lands Added to Monument.--The boundary of the Booker T. 
Washington National Monument is modified to include the approximately 
15 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ``Boundary Map, 
Booker T. Washington National Monument, Franklin County, Virginia'', 
numbered BOWA 404/80,024, and dated February 2001. The map shall be on 
file and available for inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
    ``(b) Acquisition of Additional Lands.--The Secretary of the 
Interior is authorized to acquire from willing owners the land or 
interests in land described in subsection (a) by donation, purchase 
with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange.
    ``(c) Administration of Additional Lands.--Lands added to the 
Booker T. Washington National Monument by subsection (a) shall be 
administered by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the monument 
in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Skynet Corporation d/b/a

ZeroBrokerFees.com

v. Civil No. 06-cv-218-JM

Arthur Slattery, et al.

O R D E R

In the court’s order of March 31, 2008, page 29, line 9, the

reference to Pl.’s M. for Summ. J., Ex. 9 should read Ex. 5 and

is hereby so corrected.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 2, 2008

cc: Valerie J. Bayham, Esq.

 Charles G. Douglas, Esq.

 James W. Kennedy, Esq.

 Steven M. Simpson, Esq.

 William H. Mellor, Esq.

 Jason R.L. Major, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00218-JM Document 105 Filed 04/02/08 Page 1 of 1
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-2985

LT Case Nos. 2012-CF-032555-A

 2012-CF-057952-A

 2012-CF-039441-A

 2012-CF-032556-A

 2012-CF-039508-A

 2012-CF-057954-A

 2012-CF-032560-A

 2012-CF-057955-A

_____________________________

BOBBY NELSON, III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.

Stephen G. Henderson, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. 

Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

June 11, 2024
2

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, LAMBERT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Order filed, May 4, 2022.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-22-00214-CV

MONIQUE O'NEAL, Appellant

V.

EDGAR RODRIGUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2021-08371

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 21, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: AMENDMENT OF RULE 1.17 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT : : : : : NO. 145 DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 23 rd day of September, 201 6 , upon the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; the proposal to amend Pa.R.P.C. 1.17 having been published for comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 45 Pa .B. 6583 (November 14, 2015): **IT IS**  **ORDERED** pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 1.17 of the Rules of Professional Conduct is amended in the attached form. This **ORDER** shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective in 30 days

. Additions to the rules are in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rules are shown in bold and brackets.