alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Senior Executive Service; Public Debt Performance Review Board 
(PRB)

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Members of Public Debt Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Public Debt Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Bureau of the Public 
Debt (BPD). The PRB reviews the performance appraisals of career senior 
executives who are below the level of Assistant Commissioner/Executive 
Director and who are not assigned to the Office of the Commissioner in 
BPD. The PRB makes recommendations regarding proposed performance 
appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments, and other appropriate 
personnel actions.

DATES: The membership on the Public Debt PRB as described in the Notice 
is effective on September 18, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Jones, Director, Human 
Resources Division, Office of Management Services, BPD, (304) 480-8302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this Notice 
announces the appointment of the following primary and alternate 
members to the Public Debt PRB:
    Primary Members: Nancy Fleetwood, Deputy Commissioner, Office of 
the Commissioner, BPD.Anita Shandor, Assistant Commissioner, Office of 
Financing, BPD. Cynthia Z. Springer, Executive Director, Administrative 
Resource Center, BPD. John R. Swales, III, Assistant Commissioner, 
Office of Retail Securities, BPD.
    Alternate Members: Fredrick A. Pyatt, Assistant Commissioner, 
Office of Management Services, BPD.

Van Zeck,
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E8-21747 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 04-cr-202-01-PB

Stephen Mainero

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the December 6, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

resolve a pending state action in Hillsborough County and engage

in plea negotiations or otherwise prepare for trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 6, 2005 to February 7, 2006. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:04-cr-00202-PB Document 23 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 5, 2005

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:04-cr-00202-PB Document 23 Filed 12/05/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIE STOKES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 20 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                          ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                         (Dollar amounts in thousands)

                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Three Months Ended
                                            March 31,                   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                       ------------------    -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
                                         2000       1999       1999        1998      1997(1)      1996        1995
                                       -------    -------    --------    --------    -------    --------    --------
Earnings from operations.............  $43,197    $39,668    $169,339    $134,571    $24,686    $ 94,089    $ 81,696
Add:
  Interest expense...................   34,202     27,018     121,494      83,350     61,153      35,288      19,584
                                       -------    -------    --------    --------    -------    --------    --------
Earnings as adjusted.................  $77,399    $66,686    $290,833    $217,921    $85,839    $129,377    $101,280
                                       =======    =======    ========    ========    =======    ========    ========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense...................  $34,202    $27,018     121,494    $ 83,350    $61,153    $ 35,288    $ 19,584
  Capitalized interest...............    6,570      8,838      31,912      29,942     17,606      16,941      11,741
                                       -------    -------    --------    --------    -------    --------    --------
    Total fixed charges...... .......  $40,772    $35,856    $153,406    $113,292    $78,759    $ 52,229    $ 31,325
                                       =======    =======    ========    ========    =======    ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges...      1.9        1.9         1.9         1.9        1.1         2.5         3.2
                                       =======    =======    ========    ========    =======    ========    ========
</TABLE>


(1)  Earnings from operations for 1997 includes a one-time, non-cash charge of
     $71.7 million associated with costs incurred in acquiring the management
     companies from an affiliate. Excluding this charge, the ratio of earnings
     to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 1997 would be 2.0.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  August 8, 2013





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





o    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Item 8.01
Other Events




The information set forth in the press release issued by Frontier Communications Corporation on August 8, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, is incorporated herein by reference.




Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)           Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on August 8, 2013.












SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  August 8, 2013
By:/s/ Susana D’EmicSusana D’EmicSenior Vice President and Controller
NO. 12-11-00083-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DONNIE RAY THOMAS, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance. We have received the 

trial court's certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his trial 

counsel. Additionally, Appellant’s appellate counsel has notified us that based on the controlling 

law, he is of the opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction of the appeal and therefore the 

appeal must be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered March 16, 2011.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Order entered January 29, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01418

- CV
TOMMIE TUTT, Appellant

V.
THE POINT, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law N o. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 19

- 05188

- C



### O RDER
The reporter’s record is overdue and the court reporter has informed the Court that appellant has not requested preparation of the record. By letter dated January 17, 2020, we
instructe d appellant to provide written notice that he has requested preparation of the reporter’s record and written verification that he has paid the reporter’s fee or documentation that he has been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We ca utioned appellant that failure to comply may result in an order that the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s
record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). As of today’s date, appellant has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted withou t the reporter’s record. See id

. Appellant shall file his brief on the merits WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1375 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1375

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the labor 
  costs relating to items and services furnished in a geographically 
   reclassified hospital for which reimbursement under the Medicare 
              Program is provided on a prospective basis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

    Mr. Stupak (for himself, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Frost, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
   Costello, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Farr of California, and Mr. Osborne) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the labor 
  costs relating to items and services furnished in a geographically 
   reclassified hospital for which reimbursement under the Medicare 
              Program is provided on a prospective basis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Geographic Adjustment 
Fairness Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. HOSPITAL GEOGRAPHIC RECLASSIFICATION FOR LABOR COSTS FOR ALL 
              ITEMS AND SERVICES REIMBURSED UNDER PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT 
              SYSTEMS.

    Section 1886(d)(10)(D) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(10)(D)), as amended by section 304(a) of the Medicare, 
Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (as 
enacted into law by section 1(a)(6) of Public Law 106-554), is amended 
by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``(vii)(I) Any decision of the Board to reclassify a subsection (d) 
hospital for purposes of the adjustment factor described in 
subparagraph (C)(i)(II) for fiscal year 2001 or any fiscal year 
thereafter shall apply for purposes of adjusting payments for 
variations in costs that are attributable to wages and wage-related 
costs for PPS-reimbursed items and services.
    ``(II) For purposes of subclause (I), the term `PPS-reimbursed 
items and services' means each item and service for which payment is 
made under this title on a prospective basis and adjusted for 
variations in costs that are attributable to wages or wage-related 
costs that is furnished by the hospital to which such decision applies, 
or by a provider-based entity or department of that hospital (as 
determined by the Secretary).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### J. E. JOHNSTON, Jr., et al. v. W. H. HART.

No. 3998.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit, Second Division.

June 11, 1932.

J. B. Crow, of Shreveport, for appellant.

W. M. Pollock, of Mansfield, for appellees.

STEPHENS, J.

The defendant in this suit is the defendant in the case of Sam Yearling et al. v. W. H. Hart (La. App.) 142 So. 712. The legal situations presented in the two cases are identical, and the same ruling should be applied to both.

It is therefore ordered that the case be returned to the docket of this court to await further proceedings according to law.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Jacauie P . Vieira

Case No . 05-cr-214-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

34) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : January 18, 200 8

cc : Michael Sheehan, Esq .

Mark Zuckerman, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00214-JD Document 35 Filed 01/18/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

CARLTON R. CARTER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HUSKER AUTO GROUP & 

MANUFACTURER,

Defendant.

8:23CV218

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. Plaintiff filed a Complaint, Filing 

No. 1, on May 24, 2023. However, Plaintiff failed to include the $402.00 filing and 

administrative fees. Plaintiff has the choice of either submitting the $402.00 filing and 

administrative fees to the Clerk’s office or submitting a request to proceed in forma 

pauperis. Failure to take either action within 30 days will result in the Court dismissing 

this case without further notice to Plaintiff. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the Clerk’s office or submit 

a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will 

result in dismissal of this matter without further notice.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 

(“Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit”).

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline 

in this matter with the following text: October 6, 2023: Check for MIFP or payment.

8:23-cv-00218-JFB-PRSE Doc # 4 Filed: 09/05/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 51
2

Dated this 5th day of September, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00218-JFB-PRSE Doc # 4 Filed: 09/05/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 52
Exhibit








Exhibit 10(i)(iv)
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO THE
HARRIS CORPORATION 
2005 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


WHEREAS, Harris Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), heretofore has adopted and maintains the Harris Corporation 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective November 28, 2011 (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan, the Employee Benefits Committee of the Corporation (the “Employee Benefits Committee”) has the authority to adopt non-material amendments to the Plan;
WHEREAS, the Employee Benefits Committee desires to amend the Plan to clarify its provisions regarding maintenance of a grantor trust following a Change of Control of the Corporation; and
WHEREAS, the Employee Benefits Committee has determined that the above-described amendment is non-material.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan hereby is amended to insert the following new sentences immediately prior to the final sentence of Section 6.7:
For the avoidance of doubt, neither this Section 6.7 nor any other provision of this SERP shall obligate the continued maintenance of a grantor trust with respect to the SERP, and the Corporation may revoke any grantor trust it may establish for any reason and at any time (including following a Change of Control) in accordance with the provisions of such trust.  In the event of any such revocation, the Corporation shall satisfy from its general assets any SERP benefit that becomes due.
APPROVED by the HARRIS CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE on this 28th day of February, 2019.
/s/ James Girard         
James Girard, Chairperson
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 87 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 253
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 87

                          [Report No. 107-425]

Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a 
 repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent 
    nuclear fuel, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2002

 Mr. Barton of Texas (for himself, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Upton, Mr. Towns, 
 Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Burr of North Carolina, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Whitfield, Mr. 
   Rush, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Shimkus, and Mr. Pickering) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

                              May 1, 2002

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a 
 repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent 
    nuclear fuel, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That there hereby is approved 
the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for a repository, with respect to 
which a notice of disapproval was submitted by the Governor of the 
State of Nevada on April 8, 2002.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 253

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 87

                          [Report No. 107-425]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a 
 repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent 
    nuclear fuel, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 1, 2002

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Vincent Schonarth, et al.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-00151-JL 

Carroll County Department

of Corrections, Director

 O R D E R

The court is sua sponte reconsidering the Magistrate Judge’s

order on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and is

considering granting the motion, on the issue of the plaintiffs’

exhaustion of administrative remedies under the PLRA, 42 U.S.C. §

1997e(a).

On or before September 24, 2008, the plaintiffs shall file a

memorandum showing cause why the case should not be dismissed for

failure-to-exhaust. The defendants’ response will be due October

3, 2008. Neither memorandum shall exceed ten pages.

The parties shall pay particular attention to the Magistrate

Judge’s finding that the appeal procedures under the Carroll

County House of Correction Inmate Grievance Policy were “not

mandatory,” whether that finding is correct, and whether that

fact continues to be relevant after Woodman v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81

(2006).

The clerk shall remove the case from its current position on

the trial calendar.

Case 1:06-cv-00151-JL Document 22 Filed 09/10/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 10, 2008

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

Charles P. Bauer, Esq.

Lisa Lee, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00151-JL Document 22 Filed 09/10/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-098-01-PB

James J. Dorris

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the August 2, 2005 trial

in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional time

to complete discovery and engage in plea negotiations. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 2, 2005 to November 1, 2005. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00098-PB Document 8 Filed 07/18/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 19, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until October 20, 2005 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 18, 2005

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00098-PB Document 8 Filed 07/18/05 Page 2 of 2
l~al ;wU 2y P t2' ~'t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICh OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Darren Starr

v. Case No. 05-cv-264-SM

Corporal Dube. et al .

ORDF. R

As this case was recently reassigned to me and there are motions pending, trial in this matter

will be continued to February, 2008, while the court considers the dispositive motions .

SO ORDERED.

Augusv~, 2007

cc : Darren Starr, pro se

Glenn Perlow, Esq.

cAuGffe

Case 1:05-cv-00264-SM Document 46 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 1