alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Council on Disability (ncd)

# Type:

Quarterly Meeting.

# Dates And Times:

October 6, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

October 7, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

October 8, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m.

# Location: 

Hyatt Regency Crown Center, 2345 McGee Street, Kansas City, Missouri.

# Status:

October 6, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.—Open.

October 7, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.—Open.

October 7, 2008, 4:00 p.m.-5 p.m.—Closed Executive Session.

October 8, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-11 a.m.—Open.

# Agenda:

Public Comment Sessions; Discussions on Emergency Preparedness, Vocational Rehabilitation, Veterans, Healthcare; NCD's Progress Report, Reports from the Chairperson, Council Members, and the Executive Director; Unfinished Business; New Business; Announcements; Adjournment.

# Sunshine Act Meeting Contact:

Mark S. Quigley, Director of External Affairs, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax).

# Accommodations:

Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify NCD immediately.

Dated: September 10, 2008.

Michael C. Collins,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. E8-21858 Filed 9-15-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-29-01-SM

Rebecka Ayers

ORDER OF RECUSAL

As I own stock in Bank of America, a corporation that would

be entitled to restitution from the defendant, I am required to,

and hereby do recuse myself from presiding over this case. See

28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

June 13, 2006

cc: Robert M. Kinsella, Esq.

Michael J. Iacopino, Esq.

Melissa Ellworthy, USPO

Case 1:06-cr-00029-JD Document 11 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 134

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the eligibility criteria

for presumption of service-connection of certain diseases and disabilities

for veterans exposed to ionizing radiation during military service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the eligibility criteria for presumption of service-connection of

certain diseases and disabilities for veterans exposed to

ionizing radiation during military service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR PRESUMPTION OF

4 SERVICE-CONNECTION RESULTING FROM EX5 POSURE TO IONIZING RADIATION DUE TO

6 OPEN-AIR NUCLEAR TESTING.

7 Section 1112(c) of title 38, United States Code, is

8 amended—
2

•HR 134 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (3)(B)(i), by inserting before

2 the period at the end the following: ‘‘or exposure to

3 ionzing radiation due to residual contamination re4 sulting from such a detonation’’; and

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new

6 paragraph:

7 ‘‘(4) For purposes of paragraph (3)(B)(i), onsite par8 ticipation by any individual in a test involving the atmos9 pheric detonation of a nuclear device and any exposure

10 to ionzing radiation due to residual contamination result11 ing from such a detonation shall be determined without

12 regard to whether any particular level of radiation expo13 sure was measured for that individual.’’.

Æ
#### Sarah WOODSON, Appellant, v. James W. WOODSON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 28, 1956.

*666J. Russell Hornsby and C. B. Tartarí, Orlando, for appellant.

Charles M. McCarty, Orlando, for ap-pellee.

TERRELL, Justice.

May 6, 1954, Sarah Woodson sued James W. Woodson to recover damages for the negligent death of her husband, Cecil Wood-son. The complaint charged that while deceased was an invited guest in the truck of defendant, the truck turned over and her husband was killed because of defendant “failing to stay awake while driving the truck.” Motion to dismiss, to strike and depositions were filed and motion for summary judgment on the part of defendant was granted August 10, 1954. No appeal was taken from this judgment.

February 24, 1955, Sarah Woodson filed a second suit against the same defendant based on the same' accident except that she abandoned gross negligence and charged simple negligence in that defendant and her husband had a community of interest in the enterprise they were on, that both operated and controlled the truck and were sharing the expenses. The complaint was later amended to show that the relationship of private carrier for hire and passenger existed between defendant and plaintiff’s husband. Defendant again moved to dismiss, to strike and for summary judgment, the latter being grounded on the charge that the instant action involved the identical parties and subject matter that were described in the first action heretofore recounted consequently the controversy between the parties to said cause was finally determined and the summary judgment in the first action is res adjudicata as to issues raised in the present action. At final hearing the motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant was granted, from which the present appeal was prosecuted.

The only point for determination is whether or not the widow could maintain the second action for the wrongful death of her husband grounded on simple negligence after the first suit based on gross negligence under wrongful death statute resulted in judgment for defendant from which no appeal was taken.

We think the question requires a negative answer. Both causes of action were based on the wrongful death statute, Sec. 768.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., this being the second attempt to recover, the survival of actions statute is not involved. In our view the following cases conclude the point and require affirmance of the judgment. Tidwell v. Witherspoon, 21 Fla. 359, 58 Am.Rep. 665; Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617; Plymouth Citrus Products Co-op. v. Williamson, Fla., 71 So.2d 162; Prall v. Prall, 58 Fla. 496, 50 So. 867, 26 L.R.A.,N.S., 577; McEwen v. Growers’ Loan & Guaranty Co., 116 Fla. 540, 156 So. 527. See Shearn v. Orlando Funeral Home, Inc., Fla., 88 So.2d 591.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Patricia Scaglione

v. Civil No. 06-cv-140-JL

SAU 56

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41.1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with 

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

April 15, 2008 /s/ Joseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Leslie H. Johnshon, Esq.

William Scott, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00140-JL Document 20 Filed 04/15/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

NH Department of Health and Human

Services Division of Children

Youth and Familie s

v . No. 06-fp-14 8

Elena Katz and Arnold Grodma n

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis (document

no . 4) is hereby granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the

filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-148-SM .

SO ORDERED .

James R . Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judg e

Date : April 26, 200 6

cc : Brian J .X . Murphy, Esq .

Elena Katz, pro se

Arnold Grodman, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00148-SM Document 7 Filed 04/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
Entercom Communications Corp.


Non-employee Director Compensation Policy


 


 


Cash Compensation:


 


                Annual Board Retainer: 
$80,000 per year.


 


                Committee Non-chair / Membership
Fee:   


                ●  Audit Committee -
$20,000 per year


                ●  Compensation
Committee - $15,000 per year; and


                ● 
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee - $10,000 per year.


 


                Committee Chair /
Membership Fee: 


                ●  Audit Committee
Chair - $35,000 per year;


                ●  Compensation
Committee Chair - $25,000 per year; and


                ● 
Nominating/Corporate Governance Chair - $15,000 per year.


 


                Independent Lead
Director (if applicable):  $25,000 per year


 


                Payment:  The Board
Retainer, Committee Membership Fees and Committee Chair Fees shall be paid in
equal quarterly installments on May 31, August 31, November 30 and February 28
following election to the board, committee or chair position, as applicable.


 


Equity Compensation:  An annual grant of $120,000 in shares of restricted stock to be granted promptly
following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in the form previously approved by
the Compensation Committee and vest after one year.  The number of shares will
be computed based on the closing price of the Company’s stock at the end of the
last trading day immediately preceding the grant date.


 


Partial Terms.  For any director elected or appointed
to the Board other than by the shareholders at an annual meeting of
shareholders, the amount of cash and equity compensation shall be prorated (assuming
that the next annual meeting of shareholders will occur on the anniversary of
the preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders).  Similarly all compensation
changes resulting from Committee and or Chair reassignments shall be equitably
prorated.


 







 1
Exhibit 10.2


 


Execution Copy


 


ADDENDUM TO FOUNDERS’ AGREEMENT


 


THIS ADDENDUM TO FOUNDERS’ AGREEMENT (this “Addendum”),
effective as of September 1, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), is made and entered into by and between Triple-V
(1999) Ltd. and A-Labs Finance and Advisory Ltd. (each a “Founder”, and collectively the “Founders”).
Each of the Founders shall sometimes be referred to as a “Party” and collectively, as the “Parties”.


 


WHEREAS, the Founders hereto entered into a Founders’
Agreement, dated as of the Effective Date (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement, as further
set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows:


 


	1.	Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall
bear the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.



		 	 



	2.	The Agreement shall be amended such that: (i) the Company
shall be a company incorporated under the laws of Gibraltar and not the laws of England and Wales; (ii) Company’s name shall
be “INX Ltd.” and not “INX Systems Ltd.”; (iii) any reference to the Gib Company Shall be amended to refer,
mutatis mutandis, to the Company; and (iv) the governing law of the Agreement shall be the law of Gibraltar and not England.



		 	 



	3.	Unless amended hereby, all provisions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.



 


[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 


Confidential


 



    1


     


    

 


[Signature Page to Addendum to Founders’ Agreement]


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this
Addendum as of the date first written above.


 


	 	 	 
	Triple-V (1999) Ltd.	 	A-Labs Finance and Advisory Ltd.



 


Confidential


 



     


     


    

 


Execution Copy


 


[Signature Page to Addendum to Founders’ Agreement]


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this
Addendum as of the date first written above.


 


	 	 	 
	Triple-V (1999) Ltd.	 	A-Labs Finance and Advisory Ltd.



 


Confidential
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William C. Adair, Jr., hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Direct General
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Direct General Corporation.

September 23, 2003                        By: /s/ William C. Adair, Jr.
      Date                                    ----------------------------------
                                                        (Signature)

                                          Name: William C. Adair, Jr.
                                          Title: Chairman, Chief Executive
                                                 Officer and President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

NICHOLAS HEITMAN,

Defendant.

CASE NO: 4:23CR3058

DETENTION ORDER

The defendant is charged with a drug crime under the Controlled 

Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), for which the defendant could be 

required to serve ten or more years in prison. On the government's motion, the 

court held a detention hearing under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). 

The court concludes the defendant must be detained pending trial.

There is a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of 

conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at court 

proceedings and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to 

believe the defendant committed a drug crime under the Controlled Substances 

Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), for which the defendant could be required to serve 

ten or more years in prison. The defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

Based on the evidence presented and information of record, the court finds 

by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant's release would pose a 

risk of nonappearance at court proceedings, and by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant's release would pose a risk of harm to the public.

Specifically, the court finds that the defendant has a criminal history of 

violating the law and court orders; violated conditions of release previously 

imposed by a court; has a history of harming or threatening harm to others; is 

4:23-cr-03058-JMG-CRZ Doc # 16 Filed: 05/22/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 34
addicted to illegal drugs; has limited employment contacts; has failed to appear 

for court proceedings in the past; and has mental health issues.

Conditions which restrict Defendant’s travel, personal contacts, and 

possession of drugs, alcohol, and/or firearms; require reporting, education, 

employment, or treatment; or monitor Defendant’s movements or conduct; or any 

combination of these conditions or others currently proposed or available (see 18 

U.S.C. § 3142(c)), will not sufficiently ameliorate the risks posed if the defendant 

is released.

Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or a 

designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to 

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or held in 

custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable 

opportunity to consult privately with defense counsel. On order of the United 

States Court or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in 

charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to the United States 

marshal for a court appearance.

Dated May 22, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03058-JMG-CRZ Doc # 16 Filed: 05/22/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 35
exv10w62



 






Exhibit 10.62



Ms. Hilary S. Ware is an executive officer of Hanover. On January 13, 2004 the Board of Directors
adopted a resolution approving change of control protection for Ms. Ware, among others. The
resolution provides that Ms. Ware is eligible for a change of control payment of 1x her base salary
plus target bonus with no excise tax gross up payments. No formal agreement documenting such
arrangement has been entered into with Ms. Ware as of March 11, 2005. Additionally, at the same
time the Board approved change in control protection to all employees to provide accelerated
vesting of all long-term incentives and a vesting of the Company’s match under the Hanover 401(k)
plan. Ms. Ware would benefit from such resolution in the event of a change in control of Hanover.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 17, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12758

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00349-CR-T-30-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

MARQUIS DARGON, 

a.k.a. Pig, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 17, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Marquis Dargon in this direct
criminal and sentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Dargon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Barry D. Elkins, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Direct General Corporation
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Direct General Corporation.

September 23, 2003                        By: /s/ Barry D. Elkins
      Date                                    ----------------------------------
                                                        (Signature)

                                          Name: Barry D. Elkins
                                          Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK 2018-BNK15, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2018-BNK15 (the “Trust”)

 

I,Karyn Mann, on behalf of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB MasterServicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and withthe knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.       I (or ServicingOfficers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’sactivities during the preceding calendar year between January 1, 2018 andDecember 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’sperformance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.       To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all materialrespects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date:February 4, 2019

 

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Master Servicer

By:          /s/Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Membership of National Science Foundation's Senior Executive 
Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Announcement of Membership of the National Science Foundation's 
Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This announcement of the membership of the National Science 
Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is made 
in compliance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Director, Division of Human 
Resources Management, National Science Foundation, Room 315, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joseph F. Burt at the above 
address or (703) 292-8180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The membership of the National Science 
Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is as 
follows:
    Kathie L. Olsen, Deputy Director, Chairperson.
    Anthony A. Arnolie, Director, Office of Information and Resource 
Management and Chief Human Capital Officer.
    Richard A. Behnke, Head, Upper Atmosphere Research Section.
    Deborah L. Crawford, Deputy Assistant Director for Computer and 
Information Science and Engineering.
    Penelope L. Firth, Deputy Director, Division of Environmental 
Biology.
    Deborah F. Lockhart, Deputy Director, Division of Mathematical 
Sciences.
    Martha A. Rubenstein, Director, Budget Division.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Joseph F. Burt,
Director, Division of Human Resources Management.
[FR Doc. E8-22005 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M