alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
  **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Puget
        Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc .
        (the
        "Companies") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
        30, 2005
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Form 10-Q"), I, Stephen
        P. Reynolds, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
        Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  The
        Form
        10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Companies.
 
 
 
 Date:
                  November 1, 2005/s/Stephen
                  P. ReynoldsStephen
                  P. ReynoldsChairman,
                  President and
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 11.2

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE




                                                Three Months    Six Months
                                                   Ended          Ended
                                                  June 30,       June 30,
                                                    1997           1997
                                                ------------     ----------
Shares

Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                             3,948,703      3,948,703
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
   Stock options and warrants                       180,199        175,776
                                                 ----------     ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding               4,128,902      4,124,479
                                                 ==========     ==========

Net income                                       $1,031,000     $2,085,000
                                                 ==========     ==========

Fully diluted earnings per share                 $     0.25     $     0.51
                                                 ==========     ==========
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         860,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,857,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,530,543
<INVENTORY>                                    634,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,197,576
<PP&E>                                         884,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,801,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,519,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,847,020
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,564,929)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,801,577
<SALES>                                     20,847,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,847,009
<CGS>                                       18,713,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,205,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,332,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,332,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,332,880)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.31)
        

</TABLE>
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 0 9

- 1 8

- 00 178

- C R



### ____________________

CHRISTOPHER MANUEL PEREZ

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ _______________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 18

- 329214

________________________________________ ________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 16 , 20 18 , the trial co urt sentenced Christopher Manuel Perez on

a conviction for possession of marijuana

. Perez filed a notice of appeal on May 1,

2018 . The trial court signed a certification in which the court certified that this is a

plea

- bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(a)(2). The district clerk has provided the trial court’s certification to the Court

of Appeals. On May 3 , 20 18 , we notified the parties that we would dismiss the appeal

unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has2

been filed. Because the trial court’s certification shows the defendant does not have

the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice

Submitted on June 12, 2018

Opinion Delivered June 13, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of Citizens  Communications  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Mary
Agnes Wilderotter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Mary Agnes Wilderotter
------------------------------
Mary Agnes Wilderotter
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 1, 2006



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Citizens  Communications  Company
and will be retained by Citizens  Communications  Company and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered October , 2012 

In The 

Court of Rppealss 

jriftb IBiotritt of Texas; at Matta( 

No. 05-12-01383-CR 

VARINA G. HARDIN, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 004-80250-2012 

ORDER 

The Court GRANTS court reporter Claudia Webb's October 23, 2012 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter's record. We ORDER Ms. Webb to file the reporter's 

record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. 

The clerk's record is overdue. We also note that none of the boxes is checked on the 

copy of the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal that was forwarded to this 

Court. Accordingly, we ORDER the Collin County Clerk to file the clerk's record within 

FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. The clerk's record shall contain a completed copy of 

the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal. 
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable David Rippel, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 4; Claudia Webb, official 

court reporter, County Court at Law No. 4; the Collin County Clerk; and counsel for all parties. 

DAVID' L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MARCUS GREEN,

Defendant.

CASE NO: 4:23CR3055

DETENTION ORDER

The defendant is charged with a drug crime under the Controlled 

Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), for which the defendant could be 

required to serve ten or more years in prison. On the government's motion, the 

court held a detention hearing under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). 

The court concludes the defendant must be detained.

There is a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of 

conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at court 

proceedings and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to 

believe the defendant committed a firearms crime and a drug crime as defined

under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), for which the 

defendant could be required to serve ten or more years in prison. The defendant 

has not rebutted this presumption.

Based on the evidence presented and information of record, the court finds 

by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant's release would pose a 

risk of nonappearance at court proceedings, and by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant's release would pose a risk of harm to the public.

Specifically, the court finds that the defendant has a criminal history of 

violating the law and court orders; violated conditions of release previously 

4:23-cr-03055-JMG-CRZ Doc # 26 Filed: 06/08/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 36
imposed by a court; has a history of harming or threatening harm to others; has a 

prior federal felony conviction; was involved in shooting a firearm in Lincoln, 

Nebraska on June 30, 2022; was found in possession of firearms and drugs; 

uses illegal drugs; and has limited employment contacts.

Conditions which restrict Defendant’s travel, personal contacts, and 

possession of drugs, alcohol, and/or firearms; require reporting, education, 

employment, or treatment; or monitor Defendant’s movements or conduct; or any 

combination of these conditions or others currently proposed or available (see 18 

U.S.C. § 3142(c)), will not sufficiently ameliorate the risks posed if the defendant 

is released.

Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or a 

designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to 

the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or held in 

custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable 

opportunity to consult privately with defense counsel. On order of the United 

States Court or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in 

charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to the United States 

marshal for a court appearance.

Dated June 8, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03055-JMG-CRZ Doc # 26 Filed: 06/08/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 37
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 16, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 16, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0190. JOHN F. CARY, II v. SHEILAH CARY.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17107008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          49,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,767
<PP&E>                                       2,295,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,386,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,768
<BONDS>                                        736,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,313,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,386,146
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,473)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,635)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1001 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1001

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to make optional the 
     requirement that a State seek adjustment or recovery from an 
individual's estate of any medical assistance correctly paid on behalf 
            of the individual under the State Medicaid plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2001

  Mr. Rahall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to make optional the 
     requirement that a State seek adjustment or recovery from an 
individual's estate of any medical assistance correctly paid on behalf 
            of the individual under the State Medicaid plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAKING MEDICAID ESTATE RECOVERY OPTIONAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 1917(b)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396p(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``shall seek'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``may seek''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. A State (as 
defined for purposes of title XIX of the Social Security Act) may apply 
such amendments to estates and sales occurring at such earlier date as 
the State may specify.
                                 <all>
```
Accountants Acknowledgment

Linens n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

|Re: | Registration Statements Numbers 333-55803, 333-71903, 333-62982,
 333-62984 and 333-42874 on Form S-8
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With respect to the subject
registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our
report dated October 17, 2001, related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not considered a part of a
registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of sections 7 and 11
of the Act.

KPMG LLP
New York, New York
November 13, 2001
#### Edward J. PLISCHKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 7265.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1949.

Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellant.

White, Holloman & White, of Alexandria, and C. E. Laborde, Jr., of Marksville, for appellees.

KENNON, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in, La.App., 38 So.2d 266, the judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demand is affirmed, with costs.
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60699

Conference Calendar

 

JOHN M. JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WINSTON COUNTY JAIL; 

MIKE ESTES, Sheriff, Winston County, 

Mississippi; JOHNNY HOLDINESS, 

Deputy Sheriff, Winston County, Mississippi,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96-CV-359-S-D

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

John M. Jackson, Mississippi prisoner # 78478, appeals the

summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit, alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.

Jackson has failed to set forth any specific facts that

would show how the lack of orthopedic treatment during the 
No. 97-60699

-2-

relatively brief period of time he was in the appellees’ custody

over the course of one night was characterized by deliberate

indifference. See Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss., 74 F.3d 633,

639 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825,

840-41 (1994) The district court’s judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED. Jackson’s motions for the appointment of counsel and

for oral argument are DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
*184*La. *847*

#### DEMERELL v. GERLINGER.

No. 33545.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1936.

See, also, 183 La. 704, *164*So. 633.

John B. Jouandot, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Maurice B. Gatlin, of New Orleans, for appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

William J. Demerell sued his wife for a separation from bed and board on the ground of alleged cruel treatment. His wife filed a rule against him to show cause why he should not be condemned to pay her alimony pendente lite and an additional sum of $15 to defray costs of court.

He filed an exception of no right or cause of action and a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that his wife had instituted alimony proceedings against him in the juvenile court for the parish of Orleans.

The rule was tried on its merits and judgment was rendered in favor of the wife, granting her the sum of $40 per month alimony, subject to a credit of $5 per week, as long as that amount was paid by him as alimony in the juvenile court. He was further directed to deposit with the clerk of the civil district court the sum of $15 covering costs of court, and required to furnish a bond in the sum of $150, to guarantee the payment of any attorney’s fees that he might be condemned to pay.

Plaintiff appealed.

It appears that the case was regularly set for hearing in this court and plaintiff failed to file a brief or to have his counsel present oral argument.

The exception of no right or cause of action is clearly without merit and it is therefore overruled.

The exception to the jurisdiction of ffie court is not well founded, the Constitution (art. 7, § 35) clearly providing that the civil district court has jurisdiction of separation from bed and board cases and rules for alimony pendente' lite, which are incidental demands.

The record shows that the plaintiff is regularly employed, earning $42.50 per week, or approximately $170 per month; he pays $8 per week for his meals and $1.50 a week for laundry. It was also shown that the wife had no income. There was no issue born of the marriage, and it does not appear that the plaintiff has any other dependents.' The sum of $40 per month for *751alimony pendente lite for the wife is therefore reasonable.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

O’NIELL, C. J., absent.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 74 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 74

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2001

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
                       was considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-44 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``December 7, 2001''; and by striking the 
date specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu thereof ``December 
1, 2001''.
                                 <all>
```