alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1785-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated August 24, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 12, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective September 12, 2008.

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially                               ( print page 54417)                            Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)                    

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-21970 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-10990 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CHRISTOPHER PETERSON, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-23-3
Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christop h e r Peterson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Peterson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
c o u n s e l’ s a s s e s s m e nt that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary9, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-10990 Document: 00512107047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2013No. 11-10990

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-10990 Document: 00512107047 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2013
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40731

Conference Calendar

 

WILLIE A. MILTON ET AL.,

 Plaintiffs,

WILLIE A. MILTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-96-CV-361

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Willie A. Milton, Texas state prisoner #561014, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as

frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief
No. 98-40731

- 2 -

could be granted. Milton argues that he was retaliated against

for acting as a jailhouse lawyer for a fellow inmate. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Milton v.

Scott, G-96-361 (S.D. Tex. May 15, 1998). To the extent that

Milton also raised a claim under the Americans with Disabilities

Act, he has abandoned such claim on appeal. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.

42.2. With the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the

dismissal by the district court, along with the dismissal of

Milton’s appeal in Sharp v. Scott, No. 98-40720, Milton now has

eight “strikes” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Milton is reminded that he is barred from filing any civil action

or appeal in forma pauperis unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. § 1915(g). See Davis v. Scott, Nos.

98-40689 & 98-40695 (5th Cir. Feb. 10, 1999) (unpublished).

APPEAL DISMISSED; APPELLANT BARRED. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g).
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1231

To amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994

to allow for increased use of school resource officers by local educational

agencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 2001

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Mr. WAMP) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and

the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities

Act of 1994 to allow for increased use of school resource

officers by local educational agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE SAFE AND DRUG–FREE

4 SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES ACT OF 1994.

5 Section 4116(c) of the Safe and Drug–Free Schools

6 and Communities Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 7116(c)) is

7 amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(c) AUTHORITY TO USE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFI9 CERS.—
2

•HR 1231 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In meeting the program re2 quirements under subsection (a), a local educational

3 agency may use up to 100 percent of the amount of

4 funds that it receives under this subpart for a fiscal

5 year to establish and operate school-based partner6 ships between local law enforcement agencies and

7 local school systems by using school resource officers

8 who operate in and around elementary and sec9 ondary schools to combat school-related crime and

10 disorder problems, gangs, and drug activities.

11 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term

12 ‘school resource officer’ has the meaning given the

13 term in section 1709(4) of the Omnibus Crime Con14 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968.’’.

Æ
1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1998 1999 2000

2001

Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.p

1 Deposits .............................. 167 71 215 101 86 102 84 80 608 75 528

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 607,574 632,482 594,094 585,710 583,655 586,607 578,573 590,820 587,566 599,043 600,129

3 Earmarked gold3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,343 9,933 9,451 9,215 9,154 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,099 9,099

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-709

In Re: JOHN CORDERO,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-358-3)

Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Cordero, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Cordero, a federal prisoner, brought this petition for a

writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to

take action on a pending motion, to hold an evidentiary hearing on

an additional motion, and to forbid the district court from imposing sentence pending appeal. Because the district court subsequently denied Cordero's pending motion, this issue is moot.

Regarding Cordero's desire to have this court order the district

court to hold an evidentiary hearing and to stay sentencing pending

appeal, we note that this court has no authority to order the district court to take such action. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988) (holding that mandamus

relief may only be invoked when respondent is under clear duty to

do act requested by petitioner). Accordingly, although we grant

leave to appeal in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54796-54797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-205-028]


Xcel Energy Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

September 16, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 27, 2008, Xcel Energy Services, Inc., 
filed revised market-based rate tariff sheets pursuant to Section 205 
of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.13 of the Commission's 
regulations, 18 CFR 35.13.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.

[[Page 54797]]

 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 
copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aceae9feefe3c2c0c5c2c9ffd9dcdcc3ded8eccac9decf82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="74323126373b1a181d1a11270104041b060034121106175a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 26, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22161 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Thomas Christopher and 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2014

No. 04-14-00735-CV

Brian C. SIMCOE,

Appellant

v.

Thomas CHRISTOPHER and Catrina Christopher,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-15519

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court signed a final judgment on July 9, 2014. Appellant filed a timely motion 

for new trial on August 7, 2014. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 7, 

2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was 

due on October 22, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal 

within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, he did not file a motion for extension 

of time. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for 

extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the 

predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing 

to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C). 

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, within fifteen days from the date of this order, a 

response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EX-10.25





 Exhibit 10.25 

THE SYMBOL “[***]” DENOTES PLACES WHERE CERTAIN IDENTIFIED 

INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (i) 

NOT MATERIAL, AND (ii) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE 

COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED 
 This
document is an English translation of a document prepared in German. In preparing this document, an attempt has been made to translate as literally as possible without jeopardizing the overall continuity of the text. Inevitably, however, differences
may occur in translation and if they do, the German text will govern by law. 
 In this translation, German legal concepts are expressed in English
terms and not in their original German terms. The concepts concerned may not be identical to concepts described by the English terms as such terms may be understood under the laws of other jurisdictions. 

Addendum no. 1 
 of lease agreement for commercial
premises from 17.08.2011 
 between 
 As
landlord: 
 Wolfram Richter 
 Kupferbergterrasse 15, 17-19 
 55116 Mainz 
 Tel.:
[***]; fax: [***] 
 Tax number of the landlord: [***] 
 As
tenant: 
 BioNTech AG 
 Represented by the director [***]
(with German business degree) 
 Hölderlinstraße 8 
 D-55131 Mainz 
 registered in the commercial register of County Court Mainz, register number: HRB 41865 

concerning the office areas on 3rd floor (attic floor) of front building, approx. 244 m2. 
 The late completion of the expansion means that the above-mentioned office facilities could not be
taken over on 01.10.2011 according to the agreement in section 5 of the lease agreement from 17.08.2011 for commercial premises. This area was not ready for the tenant to move in until 01.11.2011. 

The parties therefore complete the following agreement to apply retrospectively from 01.10.2011: 

The lease agreement concerning the office areas on the 3rd floor (attic floor), approx. 244 m2 starts on 01.11.2011. The end of the lease agreement for this office area remains unchanged as 31.08.2013. 

All other provisions of the lease agreement from 17.08.2011 continue to apply unchanged. 

The rent paid by the tenant in excess for the month of October 2011 for the office area on the 3rd floor
of € [***] gross will be offset against the rent for the month of November 2011. 
 Signature and stamp of the landlord 

Mainz, on [pp.
signature]                                     

Signature and stamp of the tenant, 
 Michael Kring, director of
BioNTech AG 
 Mainz, on 17.02.12
[signature]
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

             I, John Floisand, Chief Executive Officer of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|                   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|                   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                        |
|                   |
| Dated: August 14, 2002 |

|   | /s/ John FloisandJohn Floisand Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMY JACOBY,

Defendant.

8:23CR126

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 86). 

Counsel needs additional time to conduct plea negotiations. For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 86) is granted 

as follows:

1. The jury trial now set for May 28, 2024, is continued to July 29, 2024.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and July 29, 

2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the 

requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny 

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account 

the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

3. No further continuances will be granted barring exceptional circumstances.

Dated this 10th day of May 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.

Chief United States District Judge

8:23-cr-00126-RFR-MDN Doc # 87 Filed: 05/10/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 141
Presidential Documents

54289 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 183 

Friday, September 19, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8289 

Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, Constitution Week, 

2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Americans are united by the ideals of equal justice, limited government, 

and the rule of law. On Constitution Day and Citizenship Day and during 

Constitution Week, we remember the vision and determination of the Framers 

to build a free society, and we celebrate the historical document they created 

to achieve that goal. 

More than two centuries ago, our Founding Fathers gathered in Philadelphia 

and produced a charter that would promote justice and preserve the liberty 

of all our citizens. The Founders established three separate branches of 

Government with a system of checks and balances among them. Ours is 

the oldest written constitution in the world, and the American experiment 

remains the world’s best hope for freedom. 

The Constitution forged the American creed of liberty and equality and 

has lifted the lives of countless individuals. Whether they are citizens by 

birth or by oath, Americans share a great tradition of enjoying liberty protected by a constitutional government of their choosing. 

On Constitution Day and Citizenship Day, and during Constitution Week, 

Americans come together and recognize the blessings bestowed upon our 

great Nation. On this occasion we celebrate the courage of the Constitution’s 

drafters and recommit ourselves to making the United States a more perfect 

union. 

In recognition of the signing of the Constitution and of Americans who 

strive to fulfill the duties and responsibilities of citizenship, the Congress, 

by joint resolution of February 29, 1952 (36 U.S.C. 106, as amended), designated September 17 as ‘‘Constitution Day and Citizenship Day,’’ and by 

joint resolution of August 2, 1956 (36 U.S.C. 108, as amended), requested 

that the President proclaim the week beginning September 17 and ending 

September 23 of each year as ‘‘Constitution Week.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim September 17, 2008, as Constitution Day 

and Citizenship Day, and September 17 through September 23, 2008, as 

Constitution Week. I encourage Federal, State, and local officials, as well 

as leaders of civic, social, and educational organizations, to conduct ceremonies and programs that celebrate our Constitution and reaffirm our rights 

and responsibilities as citizens of this great Nation. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
54290 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E8–22116 

Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>