alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Grange Mutual Casualty and Trustguard Insurance 

Company, Respondents, 

v. 

20/20 Auto Glass, LLC, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2020-000462 

Appeal from Anderson County 

R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2021-MO-006 

Heard May 6, 2021 – Filed May 12, 2021 

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY 

GRANTED 

Joshua Matthew Henderson, of Henderson Brandt & 

Vieth, PA, of Spartanburg, and Charles J. Lloyd, of 

Livgard & Lloyd, PLLP, of Minneapolis, MN, for 

Petitioner. 

Ronald Barton Diegel and Wesley Brian Sawyer, both of 

Murphy & Grantland, PA, of Columbia, for Respondents. 
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' 

decision in Grange Mutual Casualty v. 20/20 Auto Glass, LLC, Op. No. 2019-UP419 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Dec. 31, 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently 

granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
#### Thomas D. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TULSA TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 189.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1938.

Enos S. Booth, of New York City (Harris Jay Griston, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Peaslee & Brigham, of New York City (Gerald J. McMahon and Dexter Brigham, both of New York City, of counsel), for üefendant-appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





C.W.
Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the “Company”) certifies
in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Report of
the Company on Form 10-QSB for quarter ended March 31, 2007 and that to the best
of his knowledge:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.





July
      23, 2008
            /s/ C.W.
      Gilluly,
      Ed.D.C.W.
      Gilluly, Ed.D.(Chief
      Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

BILLY TYLER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

4:23CV3099

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Response, Filing No. 29, to this Court’s December 

14, 2023, Memorandum and Order granting Plaintiff through and until January 16, 2024, 

to file an amended complaint that clearly states a claim or claims upon which relief may 

be granted (the “December 14 Order”), Filing No. 28. The December 14 Order was issued 

after the Eighth Circuit denied Plaintiff’s appeal, Filing No. 26, appealing the decision of 

this Court’s initial review of Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Initial Review Order”), Filing No. 20. 

In the Initial Review Order, this Court found that summary dismissal was appropriate 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) but allowed Plaintiff 30 days in which to file an amended 

complaint that clearly stated a claim or claims upon which relief may be granted.

1

 Id. 

1

In its Initial Review Order, Plaintiff was also warned that failure to file an amended complaint consistent 

with the Initial Review would result in dismissal of his case without prejudice and without further notice. 

Filing No. 20 at 7.

4:23-cv-03099-JFB-PRSE Doc # 30 Filed: 01/31/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 75
2

The totality of Plaintiff’s Response is as follows: “we stand on Complaint as 

written.” Filing No. 29. The Court construes Plaintiff’s Response as declining to accept 

this Court’s prior offers to amend and instead seeking to proceed under the original 

Complaint.

As this Court previously found that the entire Complaint was subject to dismissal 

without amendment due to Plaintiff’s failure to sufficiently plead both factual and 

jurisdictional allegations, Filing No. 20 at 4–6, and as Plaintiff specifically declines filing 

an amended complaint in his Response, for the reasons set forth in the Initial Review

Order and the December 14 Order, see Filing Nos. 20 and 28, this matter must be 

dismissed in its entirety. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice as 

Plaintiff’s Complaint failed to state a claim against any defendant upon which relief may 

be granted and as Plaintiff failed to comply with this Court’s Initial Review and December

14 Orders. Filing Nos. 20 and 28. The Court will enter judgment by a separate document. 

Dated this 31st day of January, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Court

4:23-cv-03099-JFB-PRSE Doc # 30 Filed: 01/31/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 76
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 30th meeting of the American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.). 

# DATES:

October 7, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern]. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC                               ( print page 54598)                            20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​consumer/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how to encourage the widespread adoption of a personal health record that is easy-to-use, portable, longitudinal, affordable, and consumer-centered. 

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​consumer/​ce_​instruct.html*.                 

Dated: September 12, 2008. 

Judith Sparrow, 

Director, American Health Information Community,  Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. E8-22021 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00374

- CV

J OSEPH L AMBERT AND S USAN L

AMBERT
, Appellants

V

.

S TATE F ARM L LOYDS AND T EVIN S ENNE
, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 415th District Court

of Parker County (CV16

- 0048)

November 7, 2019

Opinion by J ustice Kerr

J U DGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We affirm th e portion of the trial

court’s summary judgment for Appellees State Farm Lloyds and Tevin Senne on all of

the Appella nts Josep h Lambert ’ s and Su san Lambert ’ s claims except their Texas

Prompt Payment of Claims Act ( TPPCA ) claim

. We reverse th e portion of the trial

court ’s summary judgment for State Fa r m on the Lamberts ’ TPPCA claim andremand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion

.

It is further ordered that ea ch party shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

_______________ ___ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1307

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to increase the

Government contribution for Federal employee health insurance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. HOYER (for himself and Mr. WYNN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to

increase the Government contribution for Federal employee health insurance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION

4 FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSUR5 ANCE.

6 (a) INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION

7 PAYABLE BY THE GOVERNMENT (EXPRESSED AS A PER8 CENTAGE OF GOVERNMENTWIDE WEIGHTED AVER9 AGES).—Section 8906(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code,

10 is amended by striking ‘‘72’’ and inserting ‘‘80’’.
2

•HR 1307 IH

1 (b) INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF AN

2 ENROLLEE’S ACTUAL SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES PAYABLE

3 BY THE GOVERNMENT.—Section 8906(b)(2) of title 5,

4 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘75’’ and in5 serting ‘‘83’’.

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on

7 the first day of the first contract year beginning after the

8 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: August 13, 2007

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                                   President


























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




     Date: August 13, 2007

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-236-01-PB

Shawn Hill

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the January 4, 2006

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time for

further plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from January 4, 2006 to March 7,

2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00236-PB Document 16 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 27, 2006

cc: Terry Ollila, Esq.

Michael Iacopino, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00236-PB Document 16 Filed 12/27/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, MICHAEL ROSENFELD,  Primary Financial Officer of EduLink,  Inc. (the
"Company") do hereby  certify,  in accordance  with 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         (1)      The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q/A of the  Company for the
                  period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully
                  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Periodic  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


Dated December 19, 2003                   /s/ Michael Rosenfeld
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Michael Rosenfeld
                                          Primary Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.22


 





 


December 16, 2011 Dear Tom: This letter amends
your employment agreement as set forth in your offer letter dated November 1, 2006, as amended by the letter agreement dated November
16, 2009 (“Offer Letter Agreement”). Except as stated below, the terms of the Offer Letter Agreement shall remain
in effective. The following is added as the last sentence to the section titled “Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code”:
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, payment of your severance, earned yet unpaid bonus for the previous fiscal year,
prorated target bonus for the current fiscal year, and car allowance shall be made within 60 days after your termination of employment
provided that you have executed a Release Agreement and it has become irrevocable by the date payment is to be made. To the extent
required to comply with Section 409A of the Code, if the period during which you have discretion to execute or revoke a Release
Agreement straddles two calendar years, then the Company will make the foregoing severance payments in the second year, regardless
of which year you actually deliver the executed Release Agreement to the Company. If you agree with the above revision to the
Offer Letter Agreement, please sign and date where indicated below and return the signed letter to me. Please let me know should
you have any questions. Sincerely, Agreed: Thomas G. Datter December 16, 2011 EAST\44863321.1 5/25/11 025159-000020
Exhibit 35.5  LOGO ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT CERTIFICATION Aventura
Mall Trust 2018-AVM, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-AVM (the Trust) I, James P. Shevlin, on behalf of CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer (the Certifying Servicer), certify to
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that: I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicers activities during the preceding
calendar year and the Certifying Servicers performance under the Trust and Servicing Agreement; and To the best of
my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year. Date: March 1, 2019 CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer  By:

/s/ James P. ShevlinName:

James P. ShevlinTitle:

President/Chief Operating Officer  7501 Wisconsin Avenue |
Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR'THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

C

Michael DeAngelis

V.

Hillsborough Countv

Department of Corrections, et al .

Case No. 04-cv-456-SM

,CORDER

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated July 11, 2007, no objection having been filed, for the reasons set

forth therein. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary

Restraining Order (document no . 139) is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

Augustg , 2007

cc : Michael DeAngelis, pro se

John Curran, Esq.

Elizabeth Hurley, Esq.

Carolyn Kirby, Esq.

Chief Judge

'°Z..--'- -

Steven,Y McAuliffe

Case 1:04-cv-00456-SM Document 147 Filed 08/08/07 Page 1 of 1
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6501

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SHAWN THOMAS, a/k/a Bucky , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , Chief District Judge. ( 1:17

- cr - 00163

- JKB

- 2; 1:20

- cv - 00409

- JKB )

Submitted : October 21, 2022 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE , Circuit Judge , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Shawn Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-6501 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Shawn Thomas seeks to appeal the d istrict court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s

ass essment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 5 65 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-6501 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert O'Brien, President, Director and Principal Financial Officer of Quad Metals Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  July 25, 2003

/s/Robert O'Brien

Robert O'Brien

President, Director and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 59

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   provide that no person born in the United States will be a United 
States citizen unless a parent is a United States citizen, is lawfully 
in the United States, or has a lawful immigration status at the time of 
                               the birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2001

Mr. Foley introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   provide that no person born in the United States will be a United 
States citizen unless a parent is a United States citizen, is lawfully 
in the United States, or has a lawful immigration status at the time of 
                               the birth.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No person born in the United States after the date of 
the ratification of this article shall be a citizen of the United 
States, or of any State, on account of birth in the United States 
unless the mother or father of the person is a citizen of the United 
States, is lawfully in the United States, or has a lawful status under 
the immigration laws of the United States, at the time of the birth.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```