alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Protagenic Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Garo H. Armen, Executive Chairman, and Alexander K. Arrow, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                       
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations     of the Company.



A
signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|May
    15, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Garo H. Armen            
|---------------- | --- | ---------------------------------
|                 |     | Garo
    H. Armen, PhD           
|                 |     | Executive
    Chairman           
|                 |     | (Principal
    Executive Officer)



|May
    15, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Alexander K. Arrow       
|---------------- | --- | ---------------------------------
|                 |     | Alexander
    K. Arrow, MD, CFA  
|                 |     | Chief
    Financial Officer      
|                 |     | (Principal
    Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

************************************ 

 * 

Donna Cooley * 

Plaintiff * 

 * 

 v. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-cv-282-JD 

 * 

N.H. Department of Corrections * 

and N.H. Adult Parole Board * 

Defendants * 

 * 

************************************ 

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ACCEPTED RULE 68 OFFER OF JUDGMENT 

 Defendants have made a Rule 68 offer of judgment which has been accepted by Plaintiff. 

 WHEREFORE, judgment is entered for Plaintiff Donna Cooley against the New 

Hampshire Adult Parole Board in the amount of $5,000, inclusive of all claims for attorney’s 

fees and costs. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the New Hampshire Department 

of Corrections. 

For NH Adult Parole Board For Plaintiff Donna Cooley 

__/s/ Nancy J. Smith_____ __/s/ Donna Cooley________

Nancy J. Smith Donna Cooley, Plaintiff 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

 

__/s/ Michael Sheehan__________ 

 Michael Sheehan, Esq. 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

So Ordered: 

Dated:___________________ __________________________ 

 Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

 Judge 

August 8, 2006 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Case 1:05-cv-00282-JD Document 8 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-106-01-PB

Craig Marcotte

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

August 15, 2006, trial in the above case citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and prepare a defense. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason, and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 15, 2006, to October 3, 2006. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds, pursuant to

18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A), that for the above-stated reasons

the ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00106-PB Document 10 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 8, 2006, final pretrial conference is continued

to September 26, 2006, at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

__________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

July 31, 2006

cc: Tony F. Soltani, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00106-PB Document 10 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.1


 


		CAPELOGIC INCORPORATED

Providing Technology Solutions for Financial Services


1 Windhaven Court, Monroe
Twp, NJ 08831 


Telephone: (609) 448-7930 Fax:
(973) 206-9430 


Web: www.capelogic.com


 


August 16, 2019


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.


8100 E. 22nd St. North, Building 800


Suite 102


Wichita, KS 67226


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1953 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-230876 for the above captioned Fund and acknowledge that Capelogic, Inc. is currently acting
as the independent pricing agent for the Fund. Subsequently, we hereby consent to the reference of Capelogic, Inc. as independent
pricing agent.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	Capelogic, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ SALMAN AHMAD
	 	 	Salman Ahmad
	 	 	Treasurer
Case 1:04-cv-00298-PB Document 2 Filed 08/10/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00298-PB Document 2 Filed 08/10/04 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MATTHEW TIMOTHY,

Defendant.

4:23CR3059

ORDER

Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 

17), because Defendant needs to consider and decide whether to enter a guilty 

plea. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the 

motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s motion to continue, (Filing No. 17), is granted.

2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before September 5, 

2023.

3) The conference call previously scheduled to be held on August 8, 

2023, is continued. A telephonic conference with counsel will be held 

before the undersigned magistrate judge at 9:30 a.m. on September 

12, 2023 to discuss setting any pretrial motion hearing needed, a 

change of plea hearing, or the date of the jury trial and deadlines for 

disclosing experts as required under Rule 16. Counsel for all parties 

shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to 

participate in the call.

4) The ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue 

outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy 

trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the 

motion, the time between today’s date and September 12, 2023

shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under 

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-CRZ Doc # 18 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 31
the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel 

have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately 

prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might 

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7). 

Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court’s 

local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 1st day of August, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-CRZ Doc # 18 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 32
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- BAV, a Division ofVSE Corp. Under Contract No. N00140-95-D-F021 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59772
Craig S. King, Esq. Kevin R. Pinkney, Esq. Christopher A. Bowen, Esq.

Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Russell A. Shultis, Esq. Rawn M. James, Jr., Esq.

Trial Attorneys ORDER OF DISMISSAL Appellanthas moved to dismiss its appeal with prejudice. The government has no objection. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. Dated: 8 June 2015
MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 59772, Appeal ofBAV, a Division ofVSE Corp., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Jesus Carrilo-Perez

Criminal No . 06-152-01-JD

ORDER REMITTING ASSESSMENT

Upon petition of the United States of America under the

provisions of 18 U .S .C . § 3573 for remission of the balance of

the unpaid assessment imposed upon the defendant named above and

the Court being sufficiently advised herein, it is hereb y

ORDERED, that the unpaid portion of the assessment imposed

against the defendant in the amount of $100 .00 is remitted .

DATED : April 16, 2008 / s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

U .S . District Court Judge

Case 1:06-cr-00152-JD Document 12 Filed 04/16/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1488 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1488

 To restore the jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission 
  over amusement park rides which are at a fixed site, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

Mr. Markey (for himself, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Tierney, Mrs. Maloney of New 
 York, Mr. Frank, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. 
    McKinney, Mr. Lantos, and Ms. Carson of Indiana) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To restore the jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission 
  over amusement park rides which are at a fixed site, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Amusement Park Ride Safety 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OVER FIXED SITE AMUSEMENT RIDES.

    Section 3(a)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2052(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``, and which is not permanently 
fixed to a site. Such term does not include such a device which is 
permanently fixed to a site.'' and inserting a period.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Consumer Product 
Safety Commission $500,000 for each fiscal year to enable the 
Commission to carry out the Consumer Product Safety Act as amended by 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Covance
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 1997 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001023131
<NAME>                        Covance Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                         20,960,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 130,755,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                    16,742,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              208,172,000
<PP&E>                                        314,144,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                143,314,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                443,236,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         148,502,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          571,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    113,885,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  443,236,000
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              135,723,000
<CGS>                                          90,825,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 118,584,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  474,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,015,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,650,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,153,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             8,627,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    8,627,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-85-01-PB

Richard Villar, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 1, 2007 trial in the above case, citing newly appointed

counsel and the need for additional time to complete discovery

and prepare a defense. The government and does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 1, 2007 to August 21, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00085-PB Document 60 Filed 04/19/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 19, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued to 

July 24, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 19, 2007

cc: Michael Iacopino, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

Sven Wiberg, Esq.

Douglas Miller, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00085-PB Document 60 Filed 04/19/07 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1532

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in

gross income of Social Security benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the inclusion in gross income of Social Security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Citizens Tax

5 Elimination Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME OF SO7 CIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 86 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to social security benefits)
2

•HR 1532 IH

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section:

3 ‘‘(g) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to

4 any taxable year beginning after the date of the enactment

5 of this subsection.’’

6 (b) SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS HELD HARM7 LESS.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appro9 priated (out of any money in the Treasury not other10 wise appropriated) for each fiscal year to each fund

11 under the Social Security Act or the Railroad Re12 tirement Act of 1974 an amount equal to the reduc13 tion in the transfers to such fund for such fiscal

14 year by reason of section 86(g) of the Internal Rev15 enue Code of 1986.

16 (2) NO TAX INCREASES.—It is the sense of the

17 Congress that tax increases will not be used to pro18 vide the revenue necessary to carry out paragraph

19 (1).

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certifications
--------------

I, David Weisman, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Broadband, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  January 14, 2004


/S/ David Weisman
-------------------
David Weisman,
Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2329

___________

Robert Lee Artic, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

F.C.I., Waseca; Bureau of Prisons; * District of Minnesota

J. W. Tippy, Warden, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 3, 1998

 Filed: March 20, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Lee Artic moves to reinstate his appeal from a final order of the United

States District Court for the District of Minnesota denying Artic&s 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We grant Artic&s motion to reinstate his appeal.

In light of our recent decision in Martin v. Gerlinski, 133 F.3d 1076 (8th Cir. 1998),

and for the reasons discussed therein, we reverse the judgment of the district court and

remand the case to the district court with instructions to refer the case to the Bureau of

Prisons to properly consider Artic&s eligibility for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3621(e)(2)(B). See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     LINENS 'N THINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                                     Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                               April 1, 2000      April 3, 1999
                                                               --------------     --------------
                                                                         (Unaudited)
<S>                                                                   <C>                <C>
Basic
-----

    Weighted-average number of shares
     outstanding                                                      39,482             39,156
                                                               ==============     ==============

    Net income applicable to common shares                            $5,055             $3,595
                                                               ==============     ==============

    Per share amounts
        Net income per share                                           $0.13              $0.09
                                                               ==============     ==============

Diluted
-------

    Basic weighted-average number of shares
      outstanding                                                     39,482             39,156

    Effect of outstanding stock options and
      deferred stock grants                                              936              1,706
                                                               --------------     --------------

    Diluted weighted-average number of shares
     outstanding                                                      40,418             40,862
                                                               ==============     ==============

    Net income applicable to common shares                            $5,055             $3,595
                                                               ==============     ==============

    Per share amounts
        Net income per share                                           $0.13              $0.09
                                                               ==============     ==============

</TABLE>