alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,801
<SECURITIES>                                     1,975
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,296
<INVENTORY>                                    160,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,648
<PP&E>                                       3,037,429
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,209,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,273,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          270,323
<BONDS>                                        672,045
<COMMON>                                        32,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     915,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,273,849
<SALES>                                        399,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,445
<CGS>                                          356,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  356,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,793
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

RICHARD MAYER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.,

Defendant.

8:23CV225

FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER

(AMENDED)

The Court grants the parties’ Joint Motion to Modify the Progression Order. Filing 

No. 35. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the unexpired deadlines in the final progression order are 

amended as follows:

1) The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. The status 

conference to discuss case progression, the parties’ interest in settlement, 

and the trial and pretrial conference settings currently set for July 23, 2024 

is continued and will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on 

September 6, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the 

conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the 

conference.

2) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36 and 

45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is August 12, 2024. Motions to 

compel written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 must be filed by 

August 26, 2024. 

Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall 

not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned 

magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute. 

8:23-cv-00225-JFB-JMD Doc # 36 Filed: 07/01/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 129
3) The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral 

testimony only under Rule 45, is August 12, 2024.

4) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary 

judgment is September 26, 2024. 

5) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related 

grounds is August 29, 2024.

6) All deadlines not amended herein remain unchanged. 

Dated this 1st day of July, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cv-00225-JFB-JMD Doc # 36 Filed: 07/01/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 130
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO JOHN TURNER,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00234

- CR

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 2

of Collin County, Texas

(TC # 002

- 87100

- 2014)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mario John Turner h as filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. Rule 42.2(a) permits an

appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant ’ s motion at any time before the

court ’ s decision. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2(a). Finding that Appellant has complied with the

requiremen ts of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

September 23, 2015

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1293

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to ensure the continued stability

of the Federal deposit insurance system with respect to banks and

savings associations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. LATOURETTE,

and Mr. JONES of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to ensure the

continued stability of the Federal deposit insurance system with respect to banks and savings associations, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deposit Insurance Sta5 bilization Act’’.
2

•HR 1293 IH

1 SEC. 2. MERGER OF THE DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUNDS.

2 Subsection (c) of section 2704 of the Deposit Insur3 ance Funds Act of 1996 (12 U.S.C. 1821 nt.) is amended

4 to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the

6 amendments made by this section shall take effect at the

7 end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the en8 actment of the Deposit Insurance Stabilization Act.’’.

9 SEC. 3. ASSESSMENTS TO MAINTAIN DESIGNATED RESERVE

10 RATIO.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5(d) of the Federal De12 posit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1815(d)(1)) (as amended

13 by section 2704(d)(14)(D) of the Deposit Insurance

14 Funds Act of 1996 effective in accordance with the

15 amendment made by section 2 of this Act) is amended

16 by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

17 ‘‘(4) NET INCREASE IN NEW DEPOSITS.—In the

18 case of any insured depository institution that expe19 riences a net increase in new insured deposits in ex20 cess of such percentage as the Corporation may de21 termine to be appropriate during the most recent

22 semiannual assessment period, the Board of Direc23 tors may impose a fee on the depository institution

24 in the manner provided under paragraph (1) with

25 respect to the amount of such net increase in new

26 insured deposits.’’.
3

•HR 1293 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall take effect at the end of the 60-day

3 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

4 SEC. 4. REPEAL OF MINIMUM ASSESSMENTS TO RECAPI5 TALIZE THE DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUND.

6 Section 7(b)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act

7 (12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(2)) is amended by striking subpara8 graph (E).

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Decembe r 7, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00329

- CR

Brian FAZIO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5284 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due October 5, 2017. After we sent a late brief notice, appellant filed his first motion for extension of time, which we granted in part. Thereafter, appellant’s brief was due November 13, 2017. Appellant t hen filed a second motion for extension of time, asking that we extend time to file the brief to December 2, 2017, which is a Saturday. We noted that in his motion appellant states this was a request for an additional fifteen days; however, it was actual ly a request for an additional nineteen days. Moreover, because December 2, 2017, was a Saturday, the brief was due Monday December 4, 2017, which was a total of twenty

- one days from the actual due date. After review, we granted appellant’s motion

and or dered him to file his brief in this court on or before December 4, 2017. Appellant has now filed a third motion for extension of time, asking for an additional four days, but requesting the date of December 9, 2017, a Saturday, which is actually five days from the current December 4,

2017 due date. After review, we interpret appellant’s motion as a request for an additional five days in which to file the brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file his

brief in this court on or before D ecember 11, 2017

– given that the fifth day, December 9, 2017, is a Saturday. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a).

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of December, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Covington & Burling on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation (WB468-9—1/3/08), for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2006 Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9. 

*Contact:*                     Mac Frampton, (202) 245-0317.                 

Anne K. Quinlan, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-218 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Ex. 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United  States  Code,  as adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
EduLink,  Inc.  ("EduLink"),  that, to his  knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report of
EduLink on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in such report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operation of EduLink.  This
written  statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed  original of this  statement  has been
provided  to EduLink  and will be  retained  by  EduLink  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


   Date: November 1, 2006                  By: /s/ Aleksandr Shvarts
                                           -------------------------

                                           ALEKSANDR SHVARTS
                                           Chief Executive Officer

   Date: November 1, 2006                  By: /s/ Gennady Pomeranets
                                           -------------------------

                                           GENNADY POMERANETS, CPA

                                           Chief Financial Officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 18, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1691

Lower Tribunal No. 19-31161

________________

David Lelievre, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gina 

Beovides, Judge.

Cornish Hernandez Gonzalez, PLLC, and Albert Campbell "Cam" 

Cornish, IV, for appellants.

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, Scot E. Samis and C. 

Ryan Jones (St. Petersburg), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Farinato, 315 So. 3d 724 (Fla. 

4th DCA 2021).
Exhibit 31.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, C.W. Gilluly, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMASYS Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
any other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



November 14, 2003                             /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                             Chief Financial Officer
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATION


TOP HAT SAVINGS PLAN


[AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2018]





Pursuant to the authority granted under Section 7.2(a) of the Cincinnati Financial Corporation Top Hat Savings Plan (the “Plan”), Cincinnati Financial Corporation hereby amends the Plan effective January 1, 2023 as set forth below.


1. Section 1.12 is amended to read as follows.


1.12    “Employer” means Cincinnati Financial Corporation and its U.S. subsidiaries, or their successors.


2. Section 1.14 is amended to read as follows.


1.14    “Executive” means as provided in (a) and (b) below as determined for each Plan Year.


(a) General .  Except as otherwise provided in (b) below, Executive means an Employee who satisfies (1), (2) or (3) below.


(1)    The Employer recognizes the Employee as an officer, and his Compensation is projected to be at least 120% of the indexed amount under Code §414(q)(1)(B)(i) either for the Plan Year for which eligibility is being determined, or for the immediately preceding Plan Year, as determined by the Committee.


(2)    The Employee’s Compensation, and/or Bonus for the Plan Year, when considered together, exceeds the Code §401(a)(17) compensation limit.


(3)    The Employee is designated by the Committee as eligible to participate in the Plan for purposes of some or all of its provisions.


(b) Post-2022 Grandfathered Participants .  Notwithstanding (a) above, a Grandfathered Participant is an Executive for a post-2022 Plan Year.


3. Article I is amended to add new Section 1.14A that reads as follows.


1.14A    “Grandfathered Participant” means an Employee who, for the 2022 Plan Year, was an Executive who made a Deferral Election that was effective the entire year.  If a Grandfathered Participant does not make a Deferral Election for a post-2022 Plan Year, or cancels his election during the year, he is no longer a Grandfathered Participant effective on the earlier of:  (a) the date he canceled his election; or (b) December 31 of the last post-2022 Plan Year for which he made a Deferral Election that was effective the entire year.


4. Section 7.2(a) is amended to read as follows.


(a) Amendment .  Cincinnati Financial Corporation or the Committee may amend the Plan at any time prospectively or retroactively. . The Plan can only be amended by a written instrument





---




(including Committee minutes and board resolutions) that Cincinnati Financial Corporation or the Committee considers an amendment.


Executed on 1st of December, 2022.











By: /S/ Michael J. Sewell


Michael J. Sewell,


Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Cincinnati Financial Corporation








12128337.1


2
Case 1:05-cv-00165-SM Document 12 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 2Case 1:05-cv-00165-SM Document 12 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 2
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 84

Disapproving the action taken by the President under section 203 of the

Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 2002

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the action taken by the President under section

203 of the Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the action taken by,

4 or the determination of, the President under section 203

5 of the Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on

6 March 5, 2002.

Æ
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

August 20, 2019 
 LETTER
AGREEMENT 
 BC Partners Lending Corporation (the “Company”) 

650 Madison Avenue 
 New York, New York 10022 

Re: Agreement Regarding Fees 
 This Letter Agreement documents an
undertaking by BC Partners Advisors L.P. (the “Adviser”) regarding the Incentive Fees (as defined in Section 3 of the Advisory Agreement) to be paid by the Company pursuant to the Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement
between the Company and the Adviser dated November 7, 2018, as further amended (the “Advisory Agreement”). 
 For the period ending
December 31, 2019 (the “Applicable Period”), the Adviser hereby undertakes to permanently forego payment of the 50% of the amount of any Management Fee (as defined in Section 3 of the Advisory Agreement) to be paid by the Company
pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this Letter Agreement does not require the Adviser to forego payment of an Incentive Fee (as defined in Section 3 of the Advisory Agreement) during the Applicable Period. 

To the extent the Applicable Period includes any partial fiscal quarters for the Company, the amount of fees required to be foregone under this Letter
agreement for each such quarter shall be appropriately prorated. 
 For the avoidance of doubt, certain calculations under this Letter Agreement may not be
finalized until after this Letter Agreement terminates. This Letter Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier of (i) the final calculation and determination is made regarding the amount of fees to be foregone under this Letter Agreement after
the expiration of the Applicable Period or (ii) termination of the Advisory Agreement. This Letter Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York; provided that nothing herein shall be
construed to preempt, or to be inconsistent with, any federal law, regulation or rule, including the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and any rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. 












 
			
	Sincerely,
	
	BC Partners Advisors L.P.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Henry Wang



 
			
	Name:	 	Henry Wang
	Title:	 	Managing Director



  
 2 













 ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED 

BC Partners Lending Corporation 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Edward Goldthorpe



			
	Name:	 	Edward Goldthorpe
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer


  
 3