alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                           
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT C. MCPHERSON,
III                                           
|                      |  |  |  | Robert C. McPherson, III Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Public notice.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2009.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service proposes to extend the following expiring concession contract for a period of 1 year or until such time as a new contract is executed, whichever occurs sooner. 
                        ( print page 54854)


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listed concession authorization will expire by its terms on or before December 31, 2008. The National Park Service has determined that the proposed extension is necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption. Conc ID number
Concessioner name
ParkCC-NACCOO4-89
Landmark Services Tourmobile, Inc
National Capital Parks—Central
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program Manager,  National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 202/513-7156. Dated: September 21, 2008. Katherine H. Stevenson, Assistant Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. E8-22079 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-154-01-SM

Timothy Seeley

O R D E R

Defendant Seeley’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 7). Trial has been rescheduled for the February 

2007 trial period. Defendant Seeley shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than November 2, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: January 23, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: February 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00154-SM Document 8 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 24, 2006

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00154-SM Document 8 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 117

  Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of 
             Columbia honoring former President John Adams.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2002

  Mr. Roemer (for himself and Mr. Delahunt) introduced the following 
   joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Approving the location of the commemorative work in the District of 
             Columbia honoring former President John Adams.

Whereas section 8908 of title 40, United States Code, provides that the location 
        of a commemorative work in the area described as Area I shall be deemed 
        disapproved unless approved by law not later than 150 days after 
        notification to Congress that the commemorative work should be located 
        in Area I;
Whereas Public Law 107-62 (115 Stat. 411) authorized the Adams Memorial 
        Foundation to establish a commemorative work on Federal land in the 
        District of Columbia to honor former President John Adams and his 
        legacy; and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of her determination 
        that a memorial to former President John Adams should be located in Area 
        I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK.

    (a) Approval.--Congress approves the location for the commemorative 
work to honor former President John Adams and his legacy, as authorized 
by Public Law 107-62 (115 Stat. 411), within Area I as described in 
section 8908 of title 40, United States Code, subject to the limitation 
in subsection (b).
    (b) Limitation.--The commemorative work approved in subsection (a) 
shall not be located within the Reserve.
    (c) Definition of Reserve.--In this section the term ``Reserve'' 
means the area of The National Mall extending from the United States 
Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial, and from the White House to the 
Jefferson Memorial, as depicted on the map entitled ``Commemorative 
Areas Washington, DC and Environs,'' numbered 869/86501A and dated May 
1, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-132-01-SM

Charles F. Berner

O R D E R

Defendant Berner’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 20). Trial has been rescheduled for the February

2006 trial period. Defendant Berner shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than December 12, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: January 27, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: February 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00132-SM Document 21 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 5, 2005

cc: Tony Soltani, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00132-SM Document 21 Filed 12/05/05 Page 2 of 2
Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350

        Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of EduLink, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Rosenfeld
---------------------
Michael Rosenfeld
August 19, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1773-DR]


Missouri; Amendment No. 12 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1773-DR), dated June 25, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Missouri is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 25, 2008.

    Callaway County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21952 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
# EXHIBIT 12.1

# ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST
                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

# (Dollar amounts in thousands)

# (Unaudited)

`Six Months Ended                 Twelve Months Ended
                                           June 30,                         December 31,                     
                                    --------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
                                       2001        2000       2000      1999      1998      1997(1)    1996   
Earnings from operations........... $   80,422 $   90,079 $  176,466 $ 169,339 $  134,571 $  24,686 $  94,089
Add:
   Interest expense................     67,076     71,527    145,173   121,494     83,350    61,153    35,288
Earnings as adjusted............... $  147,498 $  161,606 $  321,639 $ 290,833 $  217,921 $  85,839 $ 129,377
                                    ========== ========== ========== ========= ========== ========= =========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense................ $   67,076 $   71,527 $  145,173 $ 121,494 $   83,350 $  61,153 $  35,288
   Capitalized interest............     10,201     13,032     24,317    31,912     29,942    17,606    16,941
     Total fixed charges........... $   77,277 $   84,559 $  169,490 $ 153,406 $  113,292 $  78,759 $  52,229
                                    ========== ========== ========== ========= ========== ========= =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.        1.9        1.9        1.9       1.9       1.9       1.1       2.5
                                    ========== ========== ========== ========= ========== ========= =========`

|(1) | Earnings from  operations for 1997 includes a one-time,  non-cash  charge of $71.7 million  associated with
         costs incurred in acquiring  Archstone's  REIT and property  management  companies  from Security  Capital.
         Excluding  the charge,  the ratio of earnings to fixed  charges for the year ended  December 31, 1997 would
         be 2.0.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-42-01-SM

Thomas Lavery

O R D E R

Defendant Lavery’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 19). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 2007

trial period. Defendant Lavery shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than November 3, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference/Change of Plea: December 20, 2006 at 

1:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 9, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 20 Filed 10/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 27, 2006

cc: Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00042-SM Document 20 Filed 10/27/06 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1467

To withdraw nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment)

from the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. WAMP, Mr.

JONES of North Carolina, Mr. HAYES, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.

GIBBONS, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. STEARNS,

Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs.

CUBIN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.

SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. LIPINSKI,

Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr.

GILMAN, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr.

TAYLOR of Mississippi, and Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To withdraw nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade

relations treatment) from the People’s Republic of China.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—
2

•HR 1467 IH

1 (1) an incident occurred in international air2 space between a United States military aircraft and

3 a Chinese jet fighter on April 1, 2001;

4 (2) the United States military aircraft was an

5 EP–3E, a large propeller-driven aircraft incapable of

6 high speeds, that was struck by a highly-maneuver7 able Chinese F–8 fighter jet capable of traveling at

8 twice the speed of sound;

9 (3) due to damage, the United States military

10 aircraft was forced to make an emergency landing

11 on Hainan Island, People’s Republic of China;

12 (4) the United States military personnel were

13 removed from the aircraft by Chinese military per14 sonnel and taken to undisclosed locations; and

15 (5) the Chinese Government has failed to

16 promptly release the 24 United States military per17 sonnel.

18 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS

19 TREATMENT FROM THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC

20 OF CHINA.

21 Notwithstanding the provisions of title I of Public

22 Law 106–286, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974, or any

23 other provision of law, effective on the date of the enact24 ment of this Act, normal trade relations treatment shall

25 not apply to the products of the People’s Republic of
3

•HR 1467 IH

1 China, and normal trade relations treatment may not

2 thereafter be extended to the products of that country.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Sawtell

v. Civil No. 06-cv-229-SM

Warden, NH State Prison

O R D E R

This case is further stayed to allow the petitioner to exhaust state remedies. This case shall

be administratively closed while the stay is in effect. It is therefore ordered that counsel for the

petitioner file a status report every 90 days until the issues are resolved. The Court should, of course,

immediately be notified upon ultimate resolution of the issues.

SO ORDERED.

July 16, 2008 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Thomas J. Gleason, Esq.

Charles J. Keefe, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00229-SM Document 25 Filed 07/16/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.27


 


September 6, 2017


 


 


 


Adam Pliska


CEO/President


WPT Enterprises, Inc.


1920 Main Street, Suite 1150


Irvine, California 92614


 


		Re:	World Poker Tour Season Fifteen etc. – Exception to Exclusive Rights



 


Dear Adam:


 


We refer to the agreements, dated as of
May 10, 2013 (as amended) and May 24, 2016 (collectively the “Agreements”), between WPT Enterprises, Inc. (“WPTE”)
and National Sports Programming (“Fox”), pursuant to which Fox will distribute episodes of the World Poker Tour television
series. Any defined terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the applicable Agreement.


 


WPTE and Fox hereby agree that Section
8 of Exhibit A of each Agreement shall be amended by inserting the following paragraph (i) after the fourth full paragraph of Section
8 of Exhibit A of the May 10, 2013 Agreement, and (ii) after subparagraph 8(g) as a new subparagraph (8(h)) in Section 8 of Exhibit
A of the May 24, 2016 Agreement:


 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing
exclusive Telecast rights, WPTE shall have the right to offer for Telecast all Episodes of each season of the (Tour) Series on
an advertising video-on-demand (AVOD) basis powered by Tubi TV delivered to OTT enabled devices (e.g., Roku, Apple TV) beginning
one week after Fox premieres the final Episode of such season. Once initially available pursuant to the preceding sentence, WPTE
shall not be required to restrict the availability of Episodes on such applications on dates that Fox premieres the then current
season of the (Tour) Series (i.e., currently Sunday nights). WPTE agrees and acknowledges that Fox shall have the right to revoke
such AVOD rights with written notice to WPTE.”


 


Except as set forth herein, the Agreement
will not otherwise be changed, altered or amended and remains in full force and effect. This letter agreement, together with the
Agreements, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the Agreements.
If the above confirms your understanding, please signify your acceptance by signing below.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


NATIONAL SPORTS PROGRAMMING


 


 


By: _________________________


Name: _______________________


Title: ________________________


 


Agreed and Accepted by:


 


WPT ENTERPRISES, INC.


 


By: _________________________


Name: _______________________


Title: ________________________
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00451-CR

EX PARTE JOSEPH MADISON

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph Madison requests an out-of-time appeal in this original proceeding. By 

letter dated December 12, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Madison that the 

proceeding was subject to dismissal because it appeared this Court did not have 

jurisdiction to grant an out of time appeal. See Wallace v. State, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 

3203 (Tex. App.—Waco Apr. 25, 2007, no pet.) (“The appropriate vehicle for seeking an 

out-of-time appeal is by writ of habeas corpus from the Court of Criminal Appeals 

pursuant to article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005); Portley v. State, 89 S.W.3d 188, 189 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 

2002, no pet.); Reyes v. State, 883 S.W.2d 291, 293 n.2 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, no 

pet.).”). 
Ex parte Madison Page 2

Madison was further warned that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, 

within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal. More than 21 days have passed and Madison has not filed a 

response. 

This appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 17, 2013

Do not publish

[OT06]