alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

* 

Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc., * 

Plaintiff, * 

* 

* 

* 

* 

v. * Civil Action No. 06-CV-100-JD 

* 

HemCon, Inc., * 

Defendant * 

* 

 * 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE WITNESS DECLARATION FILED IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Defendant, HemCon, Inc. (“HemCon”) respectfully moves for leave to file a 

reply to Plaintiff Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc.’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion 

to Strike Witness Declaration Filed in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment. 

1. Defendant’s proposed reply, attached hereto, is narrowly drafted to 

address an issue raised in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Witness 

Declaration Filed in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

(“Plaintiff’s Opposition”), relating to whether and how Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

56(e) may be read in light of, and reconciled with, Federal Rule of Evidence 703. A 

reply is necessary to present the Court with additional authority on this issue, not 

included in Plaintiff’s Opposition. 

Case 1:06-cv-00100-JD Document 105 Filed 10/27/08 Page 1 of 3
2

2. As stated above, and in accordance with L.R. 7.1(e)(2), the proposed reply 

is filed simultaneously with this motion. 

3. A good faith attempt has been made to obtain concurrence in the relief 

sought in this motion. Plaintiff has not yet advised of its position on the relief requested 

in this motion. 

WHEREFORE, the defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court grant the 

following relief: 

A. Permit Defendant to file the reply memorandum attached hereto; and 

B. Grant such other relief as may be just. 

Date: October 27, 2008 RYAN KROMHOLZ & MANION, S.C. 

By: /s/ Joseph A. Kromholz 

Joseph A. Kromholz (WI Bar No. 

 1002464) 

 Daniel D. Ryan (WI Bar No. 1014606) 

 RYAN KROMHOLZ & MANION, S.C. 

 P.O. Box 26618 

 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226-0618 

 Telephone: (262) 783-1300 

 

 LOCAL COUNSEL 

By: /s/ Richard B. McNamara 

 Richard B. McNamara (NH Bar No. 1719) 

Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. 

 670 North Commercial Street, Suite 305 

 P.O. Box 808 

 Manchester, NH 03105-0808 

 Telephone: (603) 669-2211 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HEMCON, INC. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 1:06-cv-00100-JD Document 105 Filed 10/27/08 Page 2 of 3
3

I hereby certify that the within Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Reply to 

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Strike Witness Declaration Filed in Support of 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment has been forwarded to all counsel of 

record pursuant to the Court’s rules and procedures concerning electronic filing. 

Electronically Served Through ECF: Daniel E. Will, Esq. 

Date: October 27, 2008 /s/ Richard B. McNamara 

Case 1:06-cv-00100-JD Document 105 Filed 10/27/08 Page 3 of 3
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135017 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135017 COA: 278722 Wayne CC: 04-006500-01 AARON DENEAL McDONALD Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

t1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-30-2000             JUL-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-2000             JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,353                   5,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,215                  45,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,073)                 (2,073)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,738                   1,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,432                  54,432
<PP&E>                                         269,834                 269,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,361)                (82,361)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,144                 347,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,133                  37,133
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           196                     196
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,539                 129,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,144                 347,144
<SALES>                                         56,204                 117,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,204                 117,624
<CGS>                                           30,845                  63,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,845                  63,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,425                  39,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,841                   7,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,093                   7,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                       423                   3,220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                670                   4,334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       670                   4,334
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03                    0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03                    0.21


</TABLE>
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 74 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61554) and Amendment No. 685 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
      individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
200 La. 59

#### STATE of Louisiana v. MEMPHIS NATURAL GAS CO.

No. 36288.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1942.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., Cicero C. Sessions, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., John B. Smullin, of Baton Rouge, and Travis Oliver, Jr., of Monroe, for plaintiff and appellant.

Shotwell & Brown, of Monroe, for defendant and appellee.

FOURNET, Justice.

This case presents the identical issues disposed of in the case of State of Louisiana v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., Inc., La.Sup., 7 So.2d 612, handed down this day, and for the reasons therein assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      20,021,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,620,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,641,000
<PP&E>                                     229,551,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,966,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             283,009,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,634,000
<BONDS>                                     95,552,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,773,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,270,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               283,009,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           167,726,000
<CGS>                                      134,730,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,840,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,118,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   866,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,252,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, C.W.
Gilluly, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMASYS
Corporation;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)         Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)         Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this report (the
“Evaluation Date”); and




(c)         Presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;




5.           The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a)         All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and




(b)         Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal
controls.




6.           The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in any
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.










February
      29, 2008
            /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.C.W.
      Gilluly, Ed.D.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1339

To provide market loss assistance during fiscal year 2001 to owners and

producers on farms who are eligible for a final payment for fiscal year

2001 under production flexibility contracts entered into under the Agricultural Market Transition Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mr. BERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Agriculture

A BILL

To provide market loss assistance during fiscal year 2001

to owners and producers on farms who are eligible for

a final payment for fiscal year 2001 under production

flexibility contracts entered into under the Agricultural

Market Transition Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKET LOSS ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR

4 2001.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall

6 use funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation to provide

7 assistance in the form of a market loss assistance payment
2

•HR 1339 IH

1 to owners and producers on a farm that are eligible for

2 a final payment for fiscal year 2001 under a production

3 flexibility contract for the farm under the Agricultural

4 Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.).

5 (b) AMOUNT AND MANNER.—In providing payments

6 under this section, the Secretary shall—

7 (1) use the same contract payment rates as are

8 used under section 802(b) of the Agriculture, Rural

9 Development, Food and Drug Administration, and

10 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 (7

11 U.S.C. 1421 note; Public Law 106–78); and

12 (2) provide the payments in a manner that is

13 consistent with section 802(c) of that Act.

14 (c) TIMING.—The Secretary shall make the payments

15 required by this section not later than June 30, 2001.

16 (d) TREATMENT OF DIRECT SPENDING.—For pur17 poses of section 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emer18 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985, all direct spending re19 sulting from subsection (a) is designated by the Congress

20 as an emergency requirement, subject to the additional re21 quirement that the President also designate such direct

22 spending as an emergency requirement under such section.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. 06-cr-72-01-SM

David Ward

ORDER

Re: Document No. 16, Assented-to Motion to Continue

Sentencing

Ruling: Granted. The motion as filed is entirely unpersuasive

and ordinarily would be summarily denied, notwithstanding the

government’s assent (a criminal sentencing is not generally

continued simply because the defendant "is scheduled to be out of

state on a family vacation during that week"). However, assuming

that there must be more to it, the court asked Deputy Clerk Barrett

to contact defense counsel’s office to obtain some elaboration. 

Based on additional detail provided by counsel’s office, the motion

is granted, but sentencing will be promptly rescheduled to

December 8, 2006.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: November 14, 2006

cc: Mark Sisti, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, AUSA 

US Probation Office

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00072-SM Document 17 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 1
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**

**Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersignedofficers of Rand Capital Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

Dated: August 6, 2019 

 
/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President(Chief Executive Officer)
Dated: August 6, 2019 

 
/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

###### Information Security Oversight Office

      ( print page 53905)    
Pursuant to Section 1102 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 which extended and modified the Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB) as established by the Public Interest Declassification Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-567, title VII, December 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2856), announcement is made for the following committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB).                    

*Date of Meeting:*                         Saturday, September 27, 2008.                    

*Time of Meeting:*                         9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Place of Meeting:*                         National Archives and Records Administration, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 105, Washington, DC 20408.                    

*Purpose:*                         To discuss declassification program issues.                    

This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Wednesday, September 24, 2008. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining access to the location of the meeting.

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Julie A. Agurkis, PIDB Staff, Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408, telephone number (202) 357-5308.                    

Dated: September 10, 2008.

William J. Bosanko,

Director, Information Security Oversight Office.

[FR Doc. E8-21713 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of deCODE genetics, Inc. (the “Registrant”)for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned , KariStefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,and Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and (2) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.
| Dated: November 8, 2006 | /s/ Kari Stefansson         |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                    | Kari Stefansson             |
|                    | Chairman, President, Chief  |
|                    | Executive Officer           |
|                    |                        |
|                    |                        |
| Dated: November 8, 2006 | /s/ Lance Thibault          |   |
|                    | Lance Thibault              |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer and |
|                    | Treasurer                   |

 

1

----