alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GREGORY LOFTIS, 

Defendant.

8:23CR126

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial 

Motion Deadline. (Filing No. 44). The motion is unopposed by the government and the codefendant. For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline, (Filing No. 

44), is granted.

2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 6, 2023.

3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between August 7, 2023, and

September 6, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time 

under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would 

deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case.

The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this 

8:23-cr-00126-RFR-MDN Doc # 46 Filed: 08/08/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 90
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 8th day of August, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00126-RFR-MDN Doc # 46 Filed: 08/08/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 91
#### Barbara Dale HERRINGTON, Appellant, v. Damon L. HERRINGTON, Appellee.

No. 5146.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco.

June 1, 1972.

*408J. Frank Thompson, Ft. Worth, for appellant.

Dick Harbin, Dublin, for appellee.

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Final judgment was rendered in this cause on October 29, 1971. Motion for new trial was overruled on November 30, 1971, and notice of appeal was given on December 17, 1971. No Transcript or Statement of Facts has been filed in this court, nor has appellant filed motion for enlargement of time within which to do so. More than *150*days have elapsed since motion for new trial was overruled, and more than 75 days since the last date upon which appellant could, for good cause, seek enlargement of time.

Appellee has filed his motion for Affirmance on Certificate pursuant to Rule 387, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Motion granted at cost of appellee.

Affirmed on certificate.
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2018 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2018-4, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2021 and ending on February 28, 2022 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 27th day of May, 2022.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
#### ALLISON v. ÆTNA LIFE INS. CO.

No. 4876.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 4, 1935.

Thompson & Thompson, of Monroe, for appellant.

Shotwell & Brown, of Monroe, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

This case, originally decided by us on January 9, 1935, is before us on a rehearing granted the appellant.

Our attention is called to the provision in the original policy, of date June 1, 1929, in *646ease of disability.:- “The' Company will pay to the employee, in lieu of all other benefits, the amount of insurance in force upon such employee’s life at the time the disability commenced.”

We correctly found as a fact that plaintiff’s disability became known on November 10, 1931. At that time, under the terms of this policy, she was entitled to $1,000.

The rider increasing the insurance to $2,-000 is dated January 6, 1932, and provides: “Nothing contained herein shall be held to alter or affect any of the terms and conditions of this policy other than as herein stated.”

There is nothing stated changing in any way the quoted clause of the original contract. To the contrary, almost the identical language is used in the certificate issued to the individual insured under the increasing rider. In regard to disability, it provides: “The Insurance Company will pay in accordance with the method designated under the terms of the policy, the amount of insurance in force, upon such employee’s life at the time the disability commenced.”

It is plain that under neither the original nor the increased policy can the "insured recover more than the amount of insurance in force at the time the disability commenced, which, in this case, was $1,000.

Our .original opinion, which allowed the increased amount of $2,000, is accordingly reealledj and the judgment appealed from is now amended by. reducing its amount to $1,000, and, as amended, is affirmed; plaintiff to pay the cost of appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11160 and <greek-i> 11161]


Indiana Disaster <greek-i> IN-00017

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of INDIANA (FEMA-1740-DR), dated 01/30/2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 01/07/2008 and continuing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/30/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/31/2008.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/30/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/30/2008, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
    Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):
    Carroll, Cass, Elkhart, Fulton, Jasper, Marshall, Pulaski, 
Tippecanoe, White.
    Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
Indiana
    Benton, Clinton, Fountain, Howard, Kosciusko, Lagrange, Lake, 
Laporte, Miami, Montgomery, Newton, Noble, Porter, St. Joseph, Starke,
    Wabash, Warren.
Michigan
Cass, St. Joseph.
    The Interest Rates are:

For Physical Damage

    Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere: 5.875.
    Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 2.937.
    Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere: 8.000.
    Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 5.250.
    Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 4.000.

For Economic Injury

    Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit 
Available Elsewhere: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11160B 
and for economic injury is 111610.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-2152 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Mrs. Pinkie Hodges MADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WEST MONROE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 5843.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 6, 1939.

Writ of Certiorari and Review Denied April 3, 1939.

McBride & Goff, of Ruston, for appellant.

Hudson, Potts, Bernstein & Snellings, of Monroe, and W. Decker Moore, of West Monroe, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

This case grew out of the same accident involved in the suit on the docket of this court, decided today, styled Harry P. Clinton, Tutor v. City of West Monroe, 187 So. 561, and for the reasons therein assigned, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff’s cost.
#### SELFE v. TRAVIS.

No. 6949.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1946.

James G. Palmer, of Shreveport, for appellant.

O. W. & B. D. Bullock, both of Shreveport, for appellee.

HARDY, Judge.

This is a suit for the judicial determination of a boundary line between certain adjoining tracts of' land owned by plaintiff and defendant. An exception of lis pen-dens was filed by defendant and overruled. *650The surveyor appointed under order of the Court filed a map of his survey which was opposed by the defendant. There was judgment overruling the opposition, and fixing the boundary in accordance with the map of the surveyor, from which judgment defendant has appealed.

There has been filed on behalf of defendant-appellant, in this Court, a motion for a stay of proceedings, or, in the alternative, an order remanding this case pending a judgment of the District Court on the issues presented -in another suit in which the parties are identical with those in the case before us. This motion sets forth that a suit styled James E. Selfe v. Ruth H. Travis, bearing No. *92,257*on- the docket of the First District Court, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, filed long prior to the matter before us on .appeal, has been fully tried, evidence adduced and closed.

Attached to the motion we find Certified copies of the pleadings in the case to which reference is made, which pleadings indicate that the issue of boundary between the tracts of land of the respective parties was squarely raised. ’

It is pointed out on behalf of the defendant-appellant that the final adjudication of the matter now before us on appeal might have the effect of determining a boundary line as between the respective properties of the parties involved, thereby, in effect, depriving plaintiff of any relief by appeal from any judgment which may hereafter be rendered by the District Court in the suit first filed.

We are constrained to agree with the argument advanced in support of this motion. While we concede that the plaintiff in the suit before us is unquestionably entitled to the determination of a boundary line which has not been judicially established nor agreed to by the parties, we, nevertheless, must consider that- the matter of an agreement as to the boundary line was raised in the first suit. Accordingly, we think it would ill accord with the ends of justice as between the parties to máke a pronouncement fixing a boundary line under the issues advanced in the present case without the opportunity to consider the issues and proof in the other cause which is now still pending in the District Court.

Rather than risk the possibility of depriving either party of any rights by a too hasty consideration of a restricted issue of boundary and the consequent judicial determination thereof, we feel it would be in accord with principles of equity and justice to stay proceedings in this ease pending judgment in Suit No. 92,257 on the docket of the First District Court, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, and it is so ordered.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of L.M., a Child

No. 06-22-00018-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Panola County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2018-

006). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating Mother’s

parental rights to L.M. However, we reverse the trial court’s order terminating Father’s parental 

rights to L.M. and remand this case to the trial court for a new trial.

We note that the appellants have adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of 

appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 22, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 4.7


 


FORM
51-102F3


MATERIAL
CHANGE REPORT


 


		Item 1	Name and Address of Company



 


BELLUS Health Inc. (the “Company”
or “BELLUS Health”)


275 Armand-Frappier Blvd.


Laval, Québec


H7V 4A7


 


		Item 2	Date of Material Change



 


August 15, 2019


 


		Item 3	News Release



 


A press release was issued on August 15, 2019, from
Laval, Québec, and disseminated by Globe Newswire.


 


		Item 4	Summary of Material Change



 


The
Company announced a 3.6:1 consolidation of its common shares.


 


		Item 5	Full Description of Material Change



 


		5.1	Full Description of Material Change



 


On August 15, 2019, the Company
announced a 3.6:1 consolidation of its common shares (the “Consolidation”). Notice was provided to the Toronto
Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) and BELLUS Health’s common shares began trading on the TSX, on a consolidated
basis, on August 19, 2019.


 


Following the Consolidation, the
number of outstanding common shares of the Company was reduced from approximately 159.1 million outstanding common shares to approximately
44.2 million outstanding common shares, assuming no other changes to the issued capital of the Company. BELLUS Health’s common
shares continue to trade on the TSX under the existing ticker symbol BLU and was assigned the new CUSIP number 07987C204.


 


No fractional common shares were
issued in connection with the Consolidation and, in the event that a shareholder would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional
share upon such Consolidation, the number of common shares to be received by such shareholder was rounded up or down to the nearest
whole common share.


 




    	 	 	 



     


    

 


BELLUS Health’s transfer
agent, Computershare Investor Services (“Computershare”), acts as the exchange agent for the Consolidation.
Computershare has sent instructions (i.e. a Letter of Transmittal) to shareholders who hold the Company’s stock certificates
regarding the exchange of old certificates for new certificates, should they wish to do so. Until surrendered, each stock certificate
representing pre-Consolidation common shares will be deemed for all purposes to represent the number of whole post-Consolidation
common shares to which the shareholder is entitled as a result of the Consolidation. Shareholders who hold their common shares
in brokerage accounts or “street name” are not required to take any action to effect the exchange of their common shares.


 


		5.2	Disclosure for Restructuring Transactions



 


N/A


 


		Item 6	Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102



 


This report is not being filed on a confidential basis.


 


		Item 7	Omitted Information



 


N/A


 


		Item 8	Executive Officer



 


François Desjardins


Vice-President, Finance


(450) 680-4525


 


		Item 9	Date of Report



 


August 20, 2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11435] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1789-DR), dated 09/10/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Gustav.                     

*Incident Period:*                         08/29/2008 through 09/03/2008.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/15/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/10/2008.                     

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/10/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.                               ( print page 54879)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Alabama, dated 09/10/2008, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 08/29/2008 and continuing through 09/03/2008. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-22178 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 20, 2010

s1013 

# Order

October 20, 2010

141389

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141389 COA: 297267 Wayne CC: 08-019075-FC MERVIN BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 14, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 3, 2018 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of deCODE genetics, Inc. (the“Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, Kari Stefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Registrant, and Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

 
| Dated:  August 6, 2004 | /s/ Kari  Stefansson         |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Kari  Stefansson             |
|                        | Chairman,  President, Chief  |
|                        | Executive  Officer           |
|                        |                         |
|                        |                         |
| Dated:  August 6, 2004 | /s/ Lance  Thibault          |   |
|                        | Lance  Thibault              |
|                        | Chief  Financial Officer and |
|                        | Treasurer                    |

 

1

----