alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo)  **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal  Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

BANK 2018-BNK15, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2018-BNK15 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Karyn Mann, on behalf ofNational Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. andits officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent thatthey will rely upon this certification, that:

 

1.       I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during thepreceding calendar year between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement; and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date:February 4, 2019

 

 

NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,

asNCB Special Servicer

By:/s/ Karyn Mann

Name:Karyn Mann

Title:Senior Vice President
ex_154891.htm


Exhibit 10.9


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of August 8, 2019 by and between Two River Community Bank (“TRCB” or “Employer”), a banking corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, with its principal office at 766 Shrewsbury Avenue, Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07724; and William D. Moss (“Executive”), whose business address is 766 Shrewsbury Avenue, Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07724.


 


WHEREAS, TRCB and Executive executed a Deferred Compensation Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated September 1, 2016; and


 


WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Agreement TRCB has reserved to itself the right to amend the Agreement from time to time; and


 


WHEREAS, TRCB and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement to clarify that after a change in control, the Executive should not be at risk of forfeiture of the Executive’s benefit through the date of the change in control, and thus no forfeiture of benefits should occur after a change in control as a result of a termination of employment for cause.


 


NOW THEREFORE, Section 4.8 of the Agreement is amended by adding a new sentence to the end of such section which reads “On and after the date a Change in Control occurs, this Section 4.8 shall be null and void.”


 



 




 




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank and the Executive hereby execute this Amendment.


 


 


	
			EXECUTIVE:


			 


			 


			/s/ William D. Moss              


			William D. Moss       

				
			TWO RIVER COMMUNITY BANK


			 


			 


			By: /s/ A. Richard Abrahamian              


			        A. Richard Abrahamian
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00170

- CR

M UHAMMAD F AIZAN A NSARI

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 1629392R )

August 31 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the tri al court’s judgmen t s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the

trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Ga briel
#### CASUALTY RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE, Appellant, v. Luther C. PENUEL, Utica Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 5, 1954.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion Coun- ; F. R. Hocker, Judge.

Affirmed.
#### ALEXANDER ANDERSON, Inc., v. EASTMAN OIL WELL SURVEY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA et al.

No. 8763.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1938.

Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Hill, Morgan & Bledsoé and Joseph F. Westall, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
#### JOHNSON v. NOBLES.

No. 5686.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 28, 1938.

D. W. Gibson, of Harrisonburg, for petitioner.

John E. Johnson and H. Arthur Talia-ferro, both of Harrisonburg, for respondents.

DREW, Judge.

Writ refused for the reason that this court has no supervisory jurisdiction over the district courts, other than in aid of our appellate 'jurisdiction'. State ex rel. Griffin v. Morgan, 19 La.App. 709, 130 So. 868; Putnam & Norman v. Levee, 179 La. 180, 153 So. 685; Constitution of 1921, art. 7, §§ 2-29.

TALIAFERRO, J., takes no part.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6913 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6913

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
 made to reporting of third party network transactions by the American 
                        Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2022

Mrs. Steel (for herself, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Budd, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Buck, 
Ms. Herrell, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Dunn, Mr. McKinley, Mr. McClintock, Mr. 
Johnson of Ohio, and Mr. Gimenez) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the amendments 
 made to reporting of third party network transactions by the American 
                        Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Nosy Obsession with Online 
Payments Act of 2022'' or the ``SNOOP Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTIONS FOR REPORTING OF THIRD 
              PARTY NETWORK TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6050W(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Exception for De Minimis Payments by Third Party Settlement 
Organizations.--A third party settlement organization shall be required 
to report any information under subsection (a) with respect to third 
party network transactions of any participating payee only if--
            ``(1) the amount which would otherwise be reported under 
        subsection (a)(2) with respect to such transactions exceeds 
        $20,000, and
            ``(2) the aggregate number of such transactions exceeds 
        200.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6050W(c)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``described in subsection 
(d)(3)(A)(iii)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to returns for calendar years beginning after December 
        31, 2021.
            (2) Clarification.--The amendment made by subsection (b) 
        shall apply to transactions after the date of the enactment of 
        the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF OWL ROCK TECHNOLOGY FINANCE CORP.

 

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | Jurisdiction                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |                                                                                                                                                                             |
| OR TECH LENDING LLC

 

OR TECH FINANCING I LLC

 

OWL ROCK TECHNOLOGY FINANCING 2020-1

 

OWL ROCK TECHNOLOGY FINANCING 2020-1 LLC

 

ORTF FUNDING I LLC

 

ORT KB LLC

 

ORTF BC 1 LLC

 

ORTF BC 2 LLC

 

ORTF BC 3 LLC

 

ORTF BC 4 LLC | DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

CAYMAN ISLANDS

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE

 

DELAWARE |

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FERNANDO AGUIRRE-QUINTERO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 8:23CR106

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [29]. 

Counsel needs additional time to negotiate a resolution short of trial. For good cause 

shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [29] is granted, as 

follows:

1. The jury trial now set for January 29, 2024, is continued to April 1, 2024.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising 

as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s 

date and April 1, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation 

of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a 

continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective 

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

DATED: January 26, 2024.

 BY THE COURT:

s/ Susan M. Bazis

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00106-RFR-SMB Doc # 30 Filed: 01/26/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 47
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2019 (the “Report”) of Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mel Carlisle , the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 /s/    Mel CarlisleName:    Mel CarlisleDate: December 17, 2019
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NOV 15, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-13068

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D. C. Docket No. 05-00264-CV-CAP-1

LORETTA LUKE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALEXANDER BROWN, JR.,

J. CLAY, #1662, et al.,

Defendants,

DEKALB COUNTY, GA,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(November 15, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
2

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of DeKalb County, Georgia, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by

Loretta Luke, the mother of Stanley Bates, who was shot and killed by Officer

Alexander Brown during a confrontation between Bates, Luke, and Officers

Brown and Clay. Officer Brown shot Bates three times. The first two shots fired

by Brown were fired in rapid succession using a technique known as “doubletapping” or shooting in control pairs. Luke contended in the district court that

DeKalb County trains its officers to use the double-tap method and that, as a

matter of policy, the double-tap method is unconstitutional. 

After an investigation, an internal review board determined that Brown was

not justified in firing the third shot. The board, therefore, found that there was a

violation of the DeKalb County Police Department policy and permitted Officer

Brown to resign from the police department in lieu of being terminated. 

The DeKalb County Police Department’s policy under attack in this case is

that deadly force can only be used when an officer or another person is being

threatened with deadly force, and that the threat is imminent. 

Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes summary

judgment when all “pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and
3

admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no

genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving parties are entitled to

judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). 

After reviewing the record, and reading the parties’ briefs, we agree with the

district court’s finding that the policy in question is not unconstitutional regarding

the use of force in dealing with suspects armed with weapons at close range. See

Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1,105 S. Ct. 1694 (1985). Although it is

unfortunate that Officer Brown departed from the county’s policy, that departure

does not mean that the policy itself was unconstitutional or that it was the moving

force behind the alleged constitutional violation. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the county.

AFFIRMED.
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT 10.2

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Termination of Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of July 18, 2019 by and between Geospatial Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Thomas Oxenreiter (“Oxenreiter”), an employee of the Company who is currently serving as the CFO of the Company.  The Company and Oxenreiter shall collectively be referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS

A.  The Parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated October 18, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”).

B.  Due to the financial stress of the Company and the recent change in the Board of Directors and Executive Management of the Company, the Company no longer deems this Employment Agreement to be in the best interest of the Company or its shareholders.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1.  Termination of Employment Agreement.  The Company and Oxenreiter agree to terminate the Employment Agreement.  From and after July 18, 2019, Oxenreiter shall serve as the CFO of the Company as an “at will” employee at his current salary with standard Company benefits just like all of the other employees of the Company.

2.  Board of Directors.  The Parties acknowledge that Oxenreiter is currently serving as a member of the Board of Directors and he shall continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

3.  Shareholder Rights.  The Parties expressly acknowledge that this Agreement does not affect any rights that Oxenreiter has as a shareholder of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereby enter into this Agreement.

THOMAS OXENREITERGEOSPATIAL CORPORATION 

  /s/ Thomas Oxenreiter____________By:   /s/ David Truitt__________________ 

Thomas Oxenreiter, Employee/CFO       David Truitt, CEO and Director 

By:   /s/ Troy Taggart_________________

       Troy Taggart, President and Director  


1
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Covance Inc. (“Covance”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, William E. Klitgaard, Corporate Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Covance.
| Date:  | August 2, 2006 |   |                            |
|--------|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                |   |                            |
|   |                |   | /s/ William E. Klitgaard        |
|   |                |   | William E. Klitgaard            |
|   |                |   | Corporate Senior Vice President |
|   |                |   | and Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                |   | (Principal Financial Officer)   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1999
<CASH>                                          16,471
<SECURITIES>                                    14,227
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,052
<INVENTORY>                                         89
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,163
<PP&E>                                          11,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,410
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,289
<SALES>                                         12,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,616
<CGS>                                            2,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (89)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (507)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1366 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1366

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 3101 West 
 Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, as the ``Hector G. Godinez 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 3101 West 
Sunflower Avenue in Santa Ana, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Hector G. Godinez Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```