alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr-47-01-JD

Stephen M. Butler

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

21) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: January 22, 2007

cc: Harry Batchelder, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00047-JD Document 22 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, 

a Delaware Corporation;

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

J. ROLLINS CONSTRUCTION, INC., a 

Texas corporation;

Defendant.

8:23CV215

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its own motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 455(a), which 

states: “Any . . . judge . . . of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which 

his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Upon review of the complaint in the 

above-designated case, the undersigned judge shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the 

above-designated case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 455(a).

The clerk shall refer the file to the Chief Judge for reassignment to a different magistrate 

judge.

Dated this 26th day of May, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael D. Nelson 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cv-00215-BCB-SMB Doc # 8 Filed: 05/26/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Waika Arroyo

Criminal No. 06-cr-182-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

19) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: May 11, 2007

cc: Harry Batchelder, Jr., Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00182-JD Document 21 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1776-DR]


Kansas; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1776-DR), dated July 9, 2008, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of July 9, 2008.

    Barton, Ellsworth, Kingman, and Lane Counties for Public 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21953 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 06-cr–197-01-PB

Arthur Labshere

ORDER OF DETENTION

The defendant, Arthur Labshere, appeared for a supervised

release revocation hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 on

November 25, 2008. The defendant has been charged with violating

two conditions of supervised release, namely that he possessed a

controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) and

failed to comply with the conditions of the urinalysis testing

program in that he did not call in for drug testing instructions

on October 18, 2008 and October 19, 2008. 

The defendant having been charged with the aforementioned

violations has waived his right to a preliminary hearing as

provided by Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(1). 

Therefore, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1)(A)

there is probable cause that the defendant has committed the

violations.

Case 1:06-cr-00197-PB Document 16 Filed 11/26/08 Page 1 of 3
2

Previously, on March 19, 2007 the defendant was sentenced to

22 months for violating conditions of supervised release for use

of marijuana and alcohol on three separate occasions. Given the

number of occasions in which the defendant has failed to comply

with his conditions of release, I find that the defendant’s

continued violations of supervised release are at least in part

due to his addiction to controlled substances. Under the current

circumstances, no combination of conditions will be sufficient to

ensure that the defendant does not re-offend other than placement

in a residential treatment facility. Therefore, the defendant

shall be detained pending a hearing on the supervised release

revocation petition or until further order of the court. The

defendant’s counsel shall attempt to identify a residential drug

treatment program for the defendant that is acceptable to the

U.S. Probation department. The court will consider a proposal to

modify this order to allow for the defendant’s placement in a

residential drug treatment facility if an acceptable facility can

be identified. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending a hearing on the merits of the supervised release

revocation petition. 

Case 1:06-cr-00197-PB Document 16 Filed 11/26/08 Page 2 of 3
3

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement. The

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private

consultation with his counsel of record. On order of a court of

the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility

shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for the

purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 26, 2008

cc: Mark Irish, AUSA

Shawn Sweeney, Esq.

United States Marshal

United States Probation

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00197-PB Document 16 Filed 11/26/08 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 6/30/00
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          53,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  221,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,700
<INVENTORY>                                    129,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               429,700
<PP&E>                                       1,210,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 600,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,137,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          738,900
<BONDS>                                      1,251,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     354,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,137,000
<SALES>                                      2,087,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,087,400
<CGS>                                          842,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  842,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               647,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                466,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                   129,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            353,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                  93,900
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   446,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
<FN>
<F1>LOSS - PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSES ABOVE
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AUDRONIS DAPSYS,

Defendant.

4:23CR3062

ORDER

Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 

16), because Defendant and defense counsel need additional time to fully review 

the discovery. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set 

forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s motion to continue, (Filing No. 16), is granted.

2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before July 25, 2023.

3) The conference call previously scheduled to be held on June 28, 

2023, is continued. A telephonic conference with counsel will be held 

before the undersigned magistrate judge at 11:00 a.m. on August 1, 

2023 to discuss setting any pretrial motion hearing needed, a 

change of plea hearing, or the date of the jury trial and deadlines for 

disclosing experts as required under Rule 16. Counsel for all parties 

shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to 

participate in the call.

4) The ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue 

outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy 

trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the 

motion, the time between today’s date and August 1, 2023 shall be 

deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the 

requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel 

4:23-cr-03062-JMG-CRZ Doc # 17 Filed: 06/20/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 29
have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately 

prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might 

result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7). 

Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court’s 

local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 20th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03062-JMG-CRZ Doc # 17 Filed: 06/20/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 30
STYLE:

v.

RE: Case No. 15-0390 DATE

COA #: 12-14-00261-CV TC#: 2013C-11

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, L.L.C.

KEN LANDERS AND CLARLINDA LANDERS

Today the Supreme Court of Texas receive

filed a motion for extension of time to file 

for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the ab

numbered and styled case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF 

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 

TYLER, TX 75702
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 36 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141762) and Amendment No. 506 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763),
      and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and
      (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N For Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

     

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William C. Adair, Jr., hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report of Direct General Corporation on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Direct
General Corporation.

  May 9, 2006                      By:  /s/ William C. Adair, Jr.
----------------                        ---------------------------
      Date                                          (Signature)
                                   Name:  William C. Adair, Jr.
                                   Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 53686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 803

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0310]


Medical Devices; Medical Device Reporting; Baseline Reports; 
Confirmation of Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the 
effective date of October 27, 2008, for the final rule that appeared in 
the Federal Register of June 13, 2008 (73 FR 33692). The direct final 
rule amends the Medical Device Reporting regulation by removing the 
requirement for baseline reports. This document confirms the effective 
date of the direct final rule.

DATES: Effective date confirmed: October 27, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard A. Press, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health (HFZ-531), Food and Drug Administration, 1350 
Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-3457.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 13, 2008 (73 
FR 33692), FDA solicited comments concerning the direct final rule for 
a 75-day period ending August 27, 2008. FDA stated that the effective 
date of the direct final rule would be on October 27, 2008, 60 days 
after the end of the comment period, unless any significant adverse 
comment was submitted to FDA during the comment period. FDA did not 
receive any significant adverse comments.

    Authority: Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act and the Public Health Service Act, and under authority delegated 
to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the amendments issued thereby 
become effective on October 27, 2008.

    Dated: September 11, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-21756 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALLAN ONELIO VELASQUEZVELASQUEZ, 

Defendant. 

8:23CR110 

ORDER 

 

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the Federal 

Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith 

file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public Defender should 

decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of the Criminal Justice Act 

Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a draft 

appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other identifying information of 

the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for 

this district. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska. 

 DATED this 22nd day of May, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00110-BCB-MDN Doc # 14 Filed: 05/22/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 16
#### SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, and C. H. Holliday, Executors of the Estate of Henry E. Huntington, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 8787.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 7, 1938.

Ward Loveless and Robert H. Miller, both of Washington, D. C., and Elmo H. Conley and Joseph D. Peeler, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Justice, and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Befqre DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of petitioners, ordered petition to review herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER>  1
   <NAME> POTOMAC CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,388,435
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         532,415
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       662,395
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               1,431,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,014,537
<COMMON>                                       118,498
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,010,401
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            796,946
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,925,845
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          142,500
<PREFERRED>                                    125,299
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,668,973
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               3,830<F1>
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 250,625<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  150,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          985
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    163,528      
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,772
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,562,180
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                7,014,537
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,596,598
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           127,567 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,163,399
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,290,966
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        305,632
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              25,590 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 331,222
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       105,548
<NET-INCOME>                                   225,674 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     12,448
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  213,226 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       147,458 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      126,200<F2>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         311,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.80 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Included on the Balance Sheet in the caption "Short-term debt."
<F2>Total annualized interest costs for all utility long-term debt outstanding
at September 30, 1996.
<F3>No material dilution would occur if all the convertible preferred stock and
debentures were converted into common stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1244 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1244

  To name the national aviation center operated by the United States 
   Customs Service as the ``Glenn English Customs National Aviation 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2001

Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To name the national aviation center operated by the United States 
   Customs Service as the ``Glenn English Customs National Aviation 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF NATIONAL AVIATION CENTER.

    The national aviation center operated by the United States Customs 
Service and located at 5020 South Meridian Avenue in Oklahoma City, 
Oklahoma, shall be known by each department, agency, and 
instrumentality of the United States as the ``Glenn English Customs 
National Aviation Center''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, paper, map, or other 
record of the United States to the aviation center referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Glenn English 
Customs National Aviation Center''.
                                 <all>
```