alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





C.W.
Gilluly, Chief Executive Officer of AMASYS Corporation (the “Company”) certifies
in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Report of
the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 and that to
the best of his or her knowledge:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.











February
      29, 2008
            /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.DC.W.
      Gilluly, Ed.D.Chief
      Executive Officer
II

Calendar No. 204

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1552

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 17, 2001

Received

OCTOBER 25, 2001

Read the first time

OCTOBER 30, 2001

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act through November 1, 2003, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1552 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Tax Non3 discrimination Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT MOR5 ATORIUM.

6 Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47

7 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by striking ‘‘3 years after

8 the date of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on

9 November 1, 2003’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 16,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 204

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1552

AN ACT

To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet

Tax Freedom Act through November 1, 2003,and for other purposes.

OCTOBER 30, 2001

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Darren Starr

v. Case No. 05-fp-368

Major Dennis Cox, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $4.60 is due no later than

November 30, 2005. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $250.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

This case has been assigned number 05-cv-368- JD . 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 27, 2005

cc: Darren Starr, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:05-cv-00368-JD Document 3 Filed 10/27/2005 Page 1 of 1

Starr v. Cox et al Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket Nos. RP08-484-000; RP08-484-001] 

Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference in the above-referenced proceeding on Tuesday, October 7, 2008, at 10 a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

                    The Commission's August 28, 2008 Order [1]                                          directed that a technical conference be held to address the issues raised by Colorado Interstate Gas Company's (CIG) August 1, 2008 and August 8, 2008 tariff filings to modify its penalty crediting mechanism. Commission Staff and parties will have the opportunity to discuss all of the issues raised by CIG's filing including, but not limited to, technical, engineering and operational issues, and issues related to the interpretation of tariff provisions governing CIG's penalty crediting mechanism.                 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility                           ( print page 55071)                        accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Timothy Duggan at (202) 502-8326 or e-mail                     *Timothy.Duggan@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Colorado Interstate Gas Co.,*                         124 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2008).                     
        Back to Citation      

 [FR Doc. E8-22262 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54795-54796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF08-2011-000]


Bonneville Power Administration; Notice of Filing

September 16, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 12, 2008, Bonneville Power 
Administration filed an errata correcting its July 14, 2008, 2008 
Average System Cost Methodology.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.

[[Page 54796]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e080b1c0d01202227202b1d3b3e3e213c3a0e282b3c2d60292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84c2c1d6c7cbeae8edeae1d7f1f4f4ebf6f0c4e2e1f6e7aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 22, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22162 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 11-1034

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellant.

 

JUDGMENT

Entered: February 29, 2012

This cause came on to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the

District of New Hampshire and was argued by counsel.

Upon consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: The

judgment of the district court is affirmed.

By the Court:

/s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk

cc: Mr. Aframe, Mr. Biagetti, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Fiske, Mr. Flynn, Mr. Frankel, Ms. Jones, Mr.

McLane, Mr. Nathanson, Mr. Oakley, Mr. Porter, Ms. Rowley, Ms. Sherman & Mr. Van Dyke.

Case: 11-1034 Document: 36 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/29/2012 Entry ID: 5622354 Case 1:06-cv-00354-PB Document 171 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 1
#### GRAND LODGE, KNIGHTS AND LADIES OF HONOR OF AMERICA, Inc., v. James RANDALL and Isaiah Sumner.

No. 1184.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 17, 1933.

Chas. J. Mundy, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Bene H. Himel, of Franklin, for appellees.

LE BLANC, Judge.

This is one of the two suits referred to in the opinion in the case of Isaiah Sumner v. Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias of the State of Louisiana (La. App.) 147 So. 747, this day handed down, in which the issue as between Isaiah Sumner and James Bandall, intervener in that proceeding, is the same. As stated in the opinion in that case, the suits were consolidated for the purpose of trial and also for argument before this court. In this suit, judgment was rendered in favor of James Bandall recognizing him as beneficiary under the policy issued by the plaintiff in this case in favor of Allen Sumner, deceased, and, as such, entitled to the proceeds thereof which had been deposited by plaintiff in the registry of the court.

For the same reasons as are assigned in the case of Isaiah Sumner v. Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from herein be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.6

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Prime Hospitality Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
T. Szymanski, VP-Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard T. Szymanski
    --------------------

Richard T. Szymanki
VP-Finance
May 14, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Clifford E. Avery

v. Civil No. 06-cv-448-SM

Director, Rhode Island 

Department of Corrections, et al

O R D E R

The petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is necessarily denied 

as the petition is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, and because it is a second or successive petition,

over which this court has no jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) & (2). "Before a second or

successive application permitted by [§2244] is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in

the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the

application." 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Although transfer of a second or successive petition to the

court of appeals is sometimes the preferable disposition, transfer is not mandated. Pratt v. United

States, 129 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 1997). Nothing in this petition warrants transfer rather than dismissal.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner remains free, of course, to

seek authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to file a second or

successive petition. 

Case 1:06-cv-00448-SM Document 5 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

December 21, 2006 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Clifford E. Avery, pro se

Aaron L. Wiesman, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00448-SM Document 5 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANNY MILAGROS ALCANTARA,

Appellant,

v.

DAVID ANTONIO DISLA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1769

[November 16, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mariya Weekes, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE21007918.

Carrie A. Turner-Krzyzaniak of Turner Family Law, Hollywood, for 

appellant.

David Antonio Disla, Tamarac, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




December 1999


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, William C. Adair, Jr., hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Direct General
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Direct General Corporation.



      May 14, 2004                     By: /s/ William C. Adair, Jr.
------------------------                   -------------------------------------
         Date                                        (Signature)

                                       Name: William C. Adair, Jr.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                       Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and President
                                              ----------------------------------
#### Gwyneth January WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45690.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 28, 1972.

Foreman & DeGuerm by Dick De-Guerin, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Victor Driscoll, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises out of a conviction for the felony offense of shoplifting. The punishment was assessed at 2 years.

On September 3, 1971, the appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court.

Appellant contends the court erred in admitting into evidence an oral stipulation of the facts. She acknowledges that the plea of guilty was taken after the 1971 amendment to Article 1.15, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. (Acts 1971, 62nd Leg., ch. 996, p. 3028, effective June 15, 1971), which permits oral stipulations in pleas before the court, but contends that the written consent to stipulate covered only “affidavits, written state*461ments and any other documentary evidence.”

It is obvious that the printed form for the consent to stipulate was drafted prior to the amendment of Article 1.15, supra, and made no reference to oral stipulations.

Further, we note that the written stipulations entered into evidence were never offered or introduced into evidence. The only stipulations offered by the State were oral and were dictated into the record. At the conclusion of the stipulations, which were clearly sufficient to support a judgment of conviction, the record reflects :

> “THE COURT: So agreed and stipu lated by the defendant ?

> “THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

> “THE COURT: And by her attoi ney ?

> “MR. HARTMAN: Yes, Your Hon. or.

> “THE COURT: All right. . . .”

The written consent to stipulate, as required by Article 1.15, supra, is required whether the stipulations are oral or written, but we conclude that the court did not err in admitting the oral stipulations in the instant case as there was no objection and appellant and her counsel expressly agreed to the same. The ground of error relates to the admissibility of such evidence without objection, not as to whether there had been a full compliance with the requirements of Article 1.15, supra.

Next, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain her plea of guilty. It is observed that the appellant voluntarily took the witness stand and, on cross examination, made a judicial confession. In Beaty v. State, 466 S.W.2d 284, 286 (Tex.Cr.App.1971), this court wrote:

> “. . .A judicial confession standing alone is sufficient to support appellant’s guilty plea under provisions of Article 1.15, supra, despite any defects in stipulated evidence or the insufficiency of the other evidence offered. Alvarez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 374 S.W.2d 890. See also Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 455 S.W.2d 230.”

See, also, Moss v. State, 468 S.W.2d 807, 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).

The judgment is affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., not participating.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11411] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated 08/24/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Tropical Storm Fay.                     

*Incident Period:*                         08/18/2008 through 09/12/2008.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/11/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/23/2008.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Florida, dated 08/24/2008, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Sarasota, Manatee.                 

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Hillsborough. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-22176 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P