alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of EA Industries, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 27, 1998.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Ebiz Enterprises, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2002.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Einstein Noah Bagel Corp. (n/k/a ENBC Corp.) because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended April 24, 2001.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 17, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2008.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22071 Filed 9-17-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2000 and the consolidated
Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          28,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                       388
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,728
<PP&E>                                          13,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,387
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (861)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,174)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,616)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (173)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,731)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
Case 1:05-cv-00289-SM Document 10 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 2Case 1:05-cv-00289-SM Document 10 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129725 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129725 

 COA: 263516 

Jackson CC: 04-000462-FH 

DAVID JEFFREY DENSLOW,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-91-01-PB

Louis Difazio, Jr.

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the October 4, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

review discovery and prepare a defense. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from October 4, 2005 to December 6, 2005. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00091-PB Document 23 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The September 27, 2005 final pretrial conference is

continued until November 17, 2005 at 3:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 27, 2005

cc: Sandra Bloomenthal, Esq.

Donald Feith, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00091-PB Document 23 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2
Accountants' Acknowledgment


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:      Registration Statements Numbers 333-26819, 333-26827, 333-55803 
         and 333-71903 on Form S-8

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness  of the use therein of our report  dated April 19, 1999 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




KPMG LLP



New York, New York
May 17, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999             FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       3,302,406                 831,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,366                   6,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,748                  75,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,523,175               1,000,259
<PP&E>                                       3,071,324               2,778,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 196,020                 191,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,639,751               4,070,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,734,607               7,763,357
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        34,887                  17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,639,751               4,070,665
<SALES>                                        696,088                 638,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,231,138              43,998,747
<CGS>                                          505,559                 411,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,040,609              43,771,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,317,226               1,724,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             421,672                 324,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,744,389               2,013,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,400                   2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,746,789               2,015,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,746,789               2,015,649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

C.W.  Gilluly,  Chief Financial  Officer of AMASYS  Corporation  (the "Company")
certifies  in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 and
that to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.



November 14, 2005                                  /s/ C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                                   Principal Finance Officer
                                                   (Chief Financial Officer)
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1326

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

203 West Paige Street in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Tim Lee

Carter Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. WHITFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 203 West Paige Street in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Tim Lee Carter Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 203 West Paige Street in Tompkinsville, Ken6 tucky, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tim Lee

7 Carter Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1326 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the Tim Lee Carter Post Office Building.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11418 and #11419] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 3. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1786-DR), dated 09/02/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Gustav.                     

*Incident Period:*                         09/01/2008 and continuing.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/11/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/03/2008.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/02/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/02/2008 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Parishes: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Calcasieu.                 

All other parishes contiguous to the above named primary parish have previously been declared. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-22023 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Ronald William SINGSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. ROE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-56887. D.C. No. CV-02-06835-CBM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 24, 2003.

*650Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Ronald W. Singson appeals pro se the district court’s order denying him leave to file his civil rights complaint in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion a denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, *Calhoun v. Stahl,*254 F.3d 845, 845 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Singson leave to file in forma pauperis because Singson failed to authorize disbursements from his trust account to pay the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). *See*42 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(a); *Page v. Torrey,*201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

 Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2018, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITALI INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General MasterServicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, asOperating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series, 2018-BNK14 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer duringthe period from September 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) , and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision, and 

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General MasterServicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### REICHERT et al. v. NELSON.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

Sept. 23, 1936.

G. C. Durrance, of Okeechobee, for appellants.

Errol S. Willes, of Ft. Pierce, and T. D. Ellis, Jr., of Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from final decree of foreclosure of a real estate mortgage and a conditional sales contract embracing personal property to enforce the payment of $1,-300, with interest, costs, and attorneys’ (fees. •

Suit was filed after default in payment of the first installment due. During the taking of the testimony the following stipulation was dictated into the record:

> “It is hereby stipulated By and Between counsel for the Complainant and Defendants that the retain title note and contract marked Complainant’s Exhibit ‘B’ and mortgage deed marked Complainant’s Exhibit ‘C’ and attached to and made a part of the Bill of Complaint in this cause, were giVen to secure a like sum in the amount of Thirteen Hundred Dollars, and that the total amount due the Complainant by the Defendants at the time of the execution of the foregoing exhibits was in the sum of Thirteen Hundred--Dollars; the point of fact admitted being that both instruments secured the singular debt of Thirteen Hundred Dollars.”

The final decree is based on this stipulation as to the amount of the indebtedness and the application of the security.

The decree required the real estate to be sold first and the personal property to be sold only in case of necessity to make up the total amount of the decree.

We find no reversible error disclosed in the record, and therefore the decree appealed from should be and is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1395

To increase discretionary funding for certain grant programs established

under the ‘‘Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement

Assistance Programs’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To increase discretionary funding for certain grant programs

established under the ‘‘Edward Byrne Memorial State

and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Programs’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1395 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE DISCRETIONARY FUNDING FOR CER2 TAIN GRANT PROGRAMS ESTABLISHED

3 UNDER THE ‘‘EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL

4 STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AS5 SISTANCE PROGRAMS’’.

6 Section 1001(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and

7 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)) is amended

8 by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(25) There is authorized to be appropriated

10 $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 to carry out subpart

11 2 of part E of this title.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-64-01-SM

Dennis B. Hammons

O R D E R

Defendant Hammons’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 26). Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2007

trial period. Defendant Hammons shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than July 13, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 27, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00064-SM Document 27 Filed 06/29/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 29, 2007

cc: David W. Ruoff, Esq.

David Vicinanzo, Esq. 

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00064-SM Document 27 Filed 06/29/07 Page 2 of 2