alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trustand Servicing Agreement dated as of August 9, 2018, by and among BARCLAYSCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Servicer and Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-CHRS (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section3.19 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.             A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from August 9,2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

3.             A statement that a registered public accounting firm that is a member of theAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants has issued an attestationreport on such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of and for such period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 04-cr-181-01-PB

Kenneth Knight

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the April 18, 2006 trial

in the above case. Defendant’s wife recently passed away and

accordingly, additional time is requested so that he may deal

with getting her estate in order. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 18, 2006 to July 6, 2006. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:04-cr-00181-PB Document 45 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on June 27,

2006 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 7, 2006

cc: Stephen Jeffco, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:04-cr-00181-PB Document 45 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-45-01-PB

Kristyn Graham

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

September 6, 2006 trial in the above case, citing newly appointed

counsel and the need for additional time to complete discovery

and prepare a defense. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from September 6, 2006 to November 7, 2006. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00045-PB Document 18 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on October

30, 2006 at 3:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 31, 2006

cc: Bruce Kenna, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00045-PB Document 18 Filed 08/31/06 Page 2 of 2
#### MAHIN v. MAHIN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 22, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1936.

Fielding & Duncan and Adkins & Ar-now, all of Gainesville, for appellant.

Scruggs & Sobol and Fred D. Bryant, all of Gainesville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore considered, ordered, and de.creed by the court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on the authority of Braswell v. Downs, 11 Fla. 62; McCamy v. Payne, 94 Fla. 209, 113 So. 712.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

On Petition for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

The holding of the court is that the controversy attempted to be presented by the amended bill of complaint is one of equitable cognizance and that the allegations of the bill of complaint involved are sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. Such is the import of the opinion in McCamy v. Payne, 94 Fla. 209, 113 So. 712 (receded from on rehearing on other points in 94 Fla. 210, 116 So. 267). This disposes also of the motion of appellant to transfer the cause to the law side of the court, which motion the circuit court properly denied. If there are defenses to the bill such as laches, ratification, waiver, estoppel, and the like, they may be advanced in due course by answer. See Link v. Friou, 116 Fla. 337, 156 So. 719. The amended bill specifically alleges that the guardian breached the trust reposed in him for the benefit of his minor son and shows that the third party (appellant) to whom was conveyed the land acquired by him as guardian stands in such guardian’s shoes with reference to it, if the allegations and intendments of the bill are true as alleged. Such a bill is a good bill, and a motion to dismiss it should have been denied.

Rehearing denied.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-134-01/02-SM

Ellsworth Gottlieb and

Raymond Jackson

O R D E R

Defendant Gottlieb’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 32). Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2007

trial period. Defendant Gottlieb shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than March 1, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: April 23, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: May 1, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:06-cr-00134-SM Document 33 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 22, 2007

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Patrick E. Donovan, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00134-SM Document 33 Filed 02/22/07 Page 2 of 2
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07

- 20

- 001 87

- CV

KEVIN LAWSON BLAYDES , A PPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 100th District Court

Hall County, Texas Trial Court No s
. 3914 , Honorable Stuart Messer , Presiding



### January 5 , 202 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER, and DOSS, JJ.

Kevin Lawson Blaydes appeals the trial court’s judgment adjudicating his guilt and
convicting him of assault ing a peace officer

. Upon accepting a guilty plea and following

a plea agreement , the trial court placed appellant on 5 year ’ s deferred adjudication

probatio n

. Subsequently, the State moved the trial court to adjudicate appellant’s guilt in

the cause . After a hearing on the motio n, the trial court found appellant violated various

conditions of his probation, adjudicated him guilty

, and sentenced him to fifteen years in

prison

. Appellant now appeals.Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw together with an Anders 1 brief.

Through those documents, s he certifies to the Court that, after diligently searching the

record, the appeal is without merit. Accompanying the brief and motion is a copy of a

letter sent by counsel to appellant informing the latter of counsel's be lief that there were

no arguable issues warranting an appeal and of appellant's right to file a pro se response

to counsel's Anders brief. So too did counsel provide appellant with a copy of the clerk's

and reporter's records, according to the letter. By letter dated December 3 , 2020, this
Court notified appellant of h is right to file h is own brief or response by December 30 , 2020,

if he wished to do so. To date, no response has been received.

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders

, appellate counsel

discussed potential areas for appeal. Those areas included 1) sufficiency of the evidence

to support appellant’s probation violations and 2) disproportionate sentencing

. However,

s he then explained why the issues lacked merit.

We cond ucted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel's

conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman

, 252 S.W.3d 403
(Tex. Crim. App. 2008), and Stafford v. State

, 813 S.W.2d 503, 508 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991) (en banc). No issues of arguable merit were uncovered, however.

Acc ordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgmen t is affirmed. 2

Brian Quinn Chief Justice

Do not publish.

1 See Anders v. Californi a, 386 U.S. 738, 744

– 45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).

2 Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals.
MMjUnt Zlp&t-oi

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

U(4i WlV\ c£ tori do Afe\ %€ {tlUd&i* C0Sta'CI<

. k\ (WkLnl (IPPlicaLl Ul oiiu4 Of

>W&s ^JLtofc Vnqb V,Wl dltA %s ^d (W4

34 7\W 9*^ ^ifki (W ftt. fed' (W/,4ms

e*\ \W mvV ^A $ Hoick, 3dHMlta'uvl tito (tell -io VW Ui^udr CJeet/

stoA VW\ tons (WftsA (k -b 4r-fci9abV- U^iti li\ti^^(L \»U ck Urns?

Life iTM-TbAc^ W» iWM Aiife ^tinuMJ-/,

li ^Dl4.
fc'/fis lilt's 6f (W l/(iL^ dT -STok

SoN- wk No} tii/ziiUfe (& 4-"WiL}

?Aktee. VAol WiS bltiiAXkl (Jtuf of /lflfeL(

a Wtaos (Was.

\Hl fObi

&l

t^Wt V\k,» t&iexas

#k*)td .lifikvJ ZeAff '-bo
S.UBjjIECT: Statebriefly theproblem on which youdesire assistance.

:JT—= lOferrt ^^___^ \j^M"M V" "if"' M"1' ^"-• Ik ""W fcfc oir C/hjJ- i/oIu*ie %- t^Aie

SdOi-cA crn> 1

<ff ^\\\m Vc<> a fatigued fJ&/z- h^^ /L,j/K m S?tf /%•&>£

Name: %®X tx&ki

Living Quarters: j^^brk.

DISPOSITION: (Inmate will not write in this space)

&I-60 (Rev. 11-90) L-C~0 U«" K^*

No: gssfL Unit: E&

Work Assignment Sdl

S4tvT^2- (a?CVS C^C^l/iJl <J\)
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE —INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION *'.'" -

INMATE REQUESTTO OFFICIAL

REASON FOR REQUEST: (Please check one)

PLEASE ABIDE BY THE FOLLOWING CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION. THIS WILL SAVE TIME, GET YOUR REQUEST TO THE

PROPER PERSON, AND GET AN ANSWER TO YOU MORE QUICKLY.

1. • Unit Assignment, Transfer (Chairman of Classification,

Administration Building)

2. • Restoration ofLost overtime (Unit Warden-if approved, it

will'be- forwarded to the State Disciplinary Committee)

3. HJ Request for Promotion in Class or to Trusty Class

(UnitWarden- ifapproved, will be forwarded to the Director.

of Classification)

4. •. Clemency-Pardon, parole, earlyout-mandatorysupervision

(Board of Pardons and Paroles, 8610 Shoal Creek Blvd.

Austin, Texas 78757)

TO: uw Uhud

(Name and title of official)

ADDRESS,:,

5. Q Visiting List (Asst. Director ofclassification, Administration

Building) • ••'•••

6. Q Parole requirements and related information (Unit Parole

Counselor)

7. • 'Inmate Prison Record (Request for copy of record,-infor

mation on parole eligibility, discharge date, detainers-Unit

Administration)

8. • Personal Interview with a representative of an outside

agency (Treatment Division, Administration Building)

DATE: zj/daefr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      18,060,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,192,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,252,000
<PP&E>                                     163,008,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (554,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             197,812,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,334,000
<BONDS>                                     61,724,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       61,339,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,270,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               197,812,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,415,000
<CGS>                                       48,922,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,986,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                469,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   469,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
H. J. Res. 78

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–44 is further amended by striking the date specified in section

107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 21, 2001’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AA-9261; AK-962-1410-HY-P]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to Calista Corporation for lands located on Nunivak Island, Alaska. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Anchorage Daily News.

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are:

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until October 20, 2008 to file an appeal.

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of  receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Bureau of Land Management by phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at                         *ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov*. Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.                    

Dina L. Torres,

Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.

[FR Doc. E8-21914 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-101-01-PB

Kevin Corson

O R D E R

On July 22, 2009, defendant appeared for a probable cause

hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on three alleged violations

of conditions of supervision. He waived his right to a

preliminary hearing. I therefore find probable cause to hold him

for a revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee and that

he poses no danger to any other person or to the community. He

has been arrested for DUI, tested positive for marijuana, drank

even though he has a drinking problem, and violated his curfew. 

He has a record of firearm charges. The combination of guns,

cars, alcohol and drugs make him a danger to the community. 

There are no conditions which are likely to assure his presence

and the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

Case 1:05-cr-00101-PB Document 35 Filed 07/22/09 Page 1 of 2
2

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 22, 2009

cc: Sven D. Wiberg, Esq.

 William E. Morse, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00101-PB Document 35 Filed 07/22/09 Page 2 of 2
IB

Union Calendar No. 133

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1161

[Report No. 107–221]

To authorize the American Friends of the Czech Republic to establish a

memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

SEPTEMBER 28, 2001

Additional sponsors: Mr. HYDE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COSTELLO, Mrs.

THURMAN, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. LEACH, and Mr. LANTOS

SEPTEMBER 28, 2001

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 22, 2001]

A BILL

To authorize the American Friends of the Czech Republic

to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk

in the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1161 RH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Government of the Czech Re3 public is authorized to establish a memorial to honor Tomas

4 G. Masaryk on the Federal land in the District of Colum5 bia.

6 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMORA7 TIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall be

8 in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40

9 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), except that sections 2(c), 6(b), and

10 10(c) of that Act shall not apply with respect to the memo11 rial.

12 (c) LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—The

13 United States Government shall not pay any expense for

14 the establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to authorize

the Government of the Czech Republic to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.’’.

Union Calendar No. 133

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1161

[Report No. 107–221]

A BILL

To authorize the American Friends of the Czech

Republic to establish a memorial to honor TomasG. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.

SEPTEMBER 28, 2001

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee

of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed