alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Zachary Clay Norwood, Appellant

No. 06-23-00169-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 33663CR). 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and 

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case.

We further order that the appellee, the State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 12, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  January 27, 2012





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





o    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))





Item 8.01
Other Events




The information set forth in the press release issued by Frontier Communications Corporation on January 27, 2012, announcing that the Company has moved up the release date for the Company’s fourth quarter 2011 results to February 16, 2012, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, is incorporated herein by reference.  The Company had previously planned to release results on February 23, 2012.









Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)           Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on January 27, 2012 announcing that the Company has moved up the release date for the Company’s fourth quarter 2011 results.

















SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  January 27, 2012
By:/s/ Susana D’EmicSusana D’EmicSenior Vice President andController
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of Refugee Resettlement


Noncompetitive Successor Award

AGENCY: Division of Community Resettlement, Office of Refugee 
Resettlement, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice of a Noncompetitive Successor Award to Northern Virginia 
Family Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA#: 93.604.
    Legislative Authority: ``Torture Victims Relief Act (TVRA) of 
1998,'' Public Law 105-320 (22 U.S.C. 2152 note), reauthorized by 
Public Law 109-165 in January 2006. Sec. 5(a) of the law provides: 
Assistance for Treatment of Torture Victims--The Secretary of Health 
and Human Services may provide grants to programs in the United States 
to cover the cost of the following services: (1) Services for the 
rehabilitation of victims of torture, including treatment of the 
physical and psychological effects of torture. (2) Social and legal 
services for victims of torture. (3) Research and training for health 
care providers outside of treatment centers, or programs for the 
purpose of enabling such providers to provide the services described in 
paragraph (1).
    Amount of Award: Remainder of current budget period April 1, 2008 
through September 29, 2008. Award $225,896. Final budget period of the 
originally approved three-year project period September 30, 2008 
through September 29, 2009. Annual Amount $415,000.
    Project Period: April 1, 2008-September 29, 2009.
    Summary: In FY 2006, ORR awarded a competitive Services for 
Survivors of Torture grant to the Center for Multicultural Human 
Services (CMHS) in Falls Church, Virginia. The original project period 
was from September 30, 2006 through September 29, 2009. CMHS served as 
fiscal sponsor and legal entity of the approved project. As of March 
31, 2008, CMHS ceased operations. CMHS has requested permission for 
Northern Virginia Family Service to assume the grant. Northern Virginia 
has agreed to this request. The effect of this deviation request is to 
transfer the grant from the initial grantee to a new grantee with the 
scope and operations of the grant remaining unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Munia, Director, Division of 
Community Resettlement, Office of Refugee Resettlement, 370 L'Enfant 
Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447. Telephone: 202-401-4559. E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fcae93929d9098d2b18992959dbc9d9f9ad294948fd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cf9da0a1aea3abe182baa1a6ae8faeaca9e1a7a7bce1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 9, 2008.
Pamela Green-Smith,
Director, Division of Refugee Assistance, Office of Refugee 
Resettlement.
[FR Doc. E8-21614 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biophysics 
of Neural Systems Study Section, October 2, 2008, 8 am to October 3, 
2008, 5 pm, One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington Circle, 
Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the Federal Register on 
September 9, 2008, 73 FR 52395-52397.
    The meeting will be held one day only October 2, 2008, from 8 am to 
8 pm. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: September 15, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-22055 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Wayne L. Geddes, Sr.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-139-JD

City of Nashua, et al.

O R D E R

As the result of an incident with the Nashua police that

resulted in his arrest, Wayne L. Geddes, Sr., brought suit

alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and related state law

claims. The defendants, the City of Nashua, the police chief,

and three officers, moved for summary judgment on Geddes's § 1983

claims that he was arrested without probable cause in violation

of the Fourth Amendment and that the city had improper policies

and procedures which caused the alleged constitutional violations

and a state law claim of false arrest. In response, Geddes has

agreed to the dismissal of those claims.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's claim in Count I,

alleging that he was arrested without probable cause, all of his

claims in Count II, and his false arrest claim in Count III are

dismissed. Therefore, the claims remaining in this case are a

federal claim under § 1983 of excessive force in violation of the

Case 1:06-cv-00139-JD Document 16 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Fourth Amendment alleged in Count I against the individual police

officers and the state law claims alleged in Count III, other

than the claim of false arrest.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 16, 2007

cc: Brian J.S. Cullen, Esquire

Donald E. Gardner, Esquire

Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00139-JD Document 16 Filed 05/16/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PERRION BLUFORD,

Defendant.

4:23-CR-3056

 

ORDER 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The government's Motion to Dismiss Forfeiture Allegation 

(filing 70) is granted.

2. The forfeiture allegation of the Indictment (filing 1) is 

dismissed.

Dated this 15th day of February, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

John M. Gerrard

Senior United States District Judge

4:23-cr-03056-JMG-JMD Doc # 71 Filed: 02/15/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 198
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Commissioner of the

NH Insurance Department,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 05-cv-278-SM

Employers Insurance Company

of Wausau,

Defendant

O R D E R

Denied [13] Motion to Remand. The commissioner's effort to

conform the new complaint in a manner sufficient to warrant

abstention is apparent, but not effective. The dispositive

issues remain essentially as described by the court of appeals in

Sevigny v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 411 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2005). 

The state statute likely either protects defendant's set off

because it is mutual, or it does not because it is not mutual,

or, it may be "mutual" for purposes of these proceedings because

the commissioner is precluded by the prior arbitration from

arguing otherwise. There are a number of complicated issues, but

they are "not so intertwined with issues of agency authority or

state regulatory policy that their federal-court resolution would

imperil a complex regulatory scheme." Id. at 29. A pretrial

conference will be scheduled by the clerk at which the parties

Case 1:05-cv-00278-SM Document 27 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

should be prepared to discuss the possible certification of

dispositive state law issues to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

August 3, 2006

cc: Peter C. L. Roth, Esq.

Andrew R. Levin, Esq.

Doreen F. Connor, Esq.

Natasha C. Lisman, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00278-SM Document 27 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Document

Exhibit 10.40




 Catalent Pharma Solutions
Frankland Road
Blagrove, Swindon
Wiltshire SN5 8YG United Kingdom
T +44 (0) 1793 864000
F +44 (0) 1793 613394




31 January 2019


Private and Confidential


xxxxx




Dear Alessandro 


I am pleased to confirm your promotion to the role of President & Chief Operating Officer (COO) reporting to John Chiminski, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, and the following changes to your Terms & Conditions of Employment


Effective Date:
February 13, 2019


Base Salary:
Your salary in this role will increase to £385,000 per annum.  As a member of the Executive Leadership Team, your total compensation package will be reviewed on an annual basis with the next review anticipated in the first quarter of each fiscal year.


Management Incentive Plan (MIP)
You will continue participation in the Management Incentive Plan (MIP). Annual bonus payments are determined based upon the achievement of specific financial and management agenda objectives. Your annual target incentive will increase to £310,000 from the effective date.  































Exhibit 10.40



Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
Upon the Effective Date of this promotion, the Compensation Committee of the Catalent, Inc. Board of Directors has approved an increase to your long-term incentive plan (LTIP) grant value to $700,000. The Committee made the grant effective as of July 1, 2019.


All other Terms & Conditions of Employment will remain unaltered.


Yours sincerely








/s/ Lance Miyamoto
Lance Miyamoto
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc






I accept the above offer and change to Terms & Conditions of Employment






Signed      /s/ Alessandro Maselli       Date   1-31-19
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193272) and Amendment No. 694 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
      individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

US Department of Labor ,et al.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-146-PB

Fine Line Drywall. et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated November 27, 2006, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

February 1, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:06-cv-00146-PB Document 12 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 1
UNANIMOUS
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 2050 MOTORS, INC.


 


Pursuant
to the provisions of California Corporation law, as amended, and the Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of 2050 Motors,
Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), the undersigned Director(s) approve(s) the repurchase of 300,000,000
common shares of the Company’s stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions over a period of one
year.


 


The
undersigned represents the sole Director of the corporation. The vote of Directors voting in favor of the repurchase program was
unanimous. The vote was conducted at a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors at 5:00am CT on August 11, 2019.


 


WHEREAS,
the majority of the Board of Directors of the Company believes it is in the best interests of the Company to authorize the repurchase
of up to 300,000,000 common shares to protect the interests of shareholders.


 


NOW
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:


 


RESOLVED,
that the Board of Directors of the Company hereby approves the repurchase of up to 300,000,000 common shares.


 


RESOLVED,
that any of the Executive Officers of the Company are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the Company to do and
perform all acts and things and execute and deliver all documents and take all such other steps as may be necessary or desirable
to give full effect to the consent resolutions set forth above.


 


		 
	Vikram
    Grover, Sole Director
#### Ernest DAVIS v. Wilmer LANGLOIS et al.

No. 1406.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 21, 1935.

J. Y. Sanders, Jr., and Ben R. Bliller, both of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Chas. A. Holcombe, of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

ELLIOTT, Judge.

In,this case, for the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases, Waddell v. Langlois et al. (La. App.) 158 So. 665, in acting on the appeal in ease No. 7169 the judgment appealed from is affirmed; plaintiff-appellant to pay the cost in both courts.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1183

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 113 South Main Street in

Sylvania, Georgia, as the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan PostOffice Building’’.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1183

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 113 South Main Street in Sylvania, Georgia,

as the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1183 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 113 South Main Street in Sylvania, Georgia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan Post

5 Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘G. Elliot Hagan Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 20-0423

STATE OF MONTANA

Plaintiff and Appellee,

vs.

RICHARD EDWARD ADSIT, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

:

NOV 2 3 2020

BOV.t.:11 Greenwood

Cleru of Supreme Court

State of Montane

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION

On Appeal from the Montana Tenth Judicial District Court,

Cascade County, Cause No. DC-23-2018-07

Upon consideration of the Appellant's Motion for Extension and good cause

appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the transcripts shall be transmitted on or

before December 31, 2020 and the Appellant's Opening Brief shall be filed with

the court on or before February 2, 2021.

DATED this 23 day of k) , 2020.

Montana Supreme Court

Order Granting Motion for Extension - 1

11/23/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0423
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

cc: Meghan Lulf Sutton, Attorney for Appellant

Heather Perry, Judith Basin C?unty Attomey

Montana Attorney General Titp Fox

Tenth Judicial District Court, Judith Basin County

Order Granting Motion for Extension - 2
EXHIBIT 15


                           Accountants' Acknowledgment


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:      Registration Statements Numbers 333-26819 and 333-26827 on Form S-8

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness  of the use therein of our report  dated April 14, 1998 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



New York, New York
May 12, 1998
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-253-01-SM

Keith Shane MacLeod

O R D E R

Defendant MacLeod’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2006

trial period. Defendant MacLeod shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than December 20, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: February 22, 2006 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: March 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00253-SM Document 15 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 13, 2005

cc: Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Mark Howard, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00253-SM Document 15 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4019

_____________________________
M ARK S. I NCH , Secretary, Florida Department o f Corrections
, Appellant,

v.
Q UINCY W ILLIAMS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Karen Gievers , Judge

. October 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Quincy Williams, pro se, Appellee.
#### Charles E. MCMANAMA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bill KENNEMER, Clackamas County Commissioner, et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-35101. D.C. No. CV-02-00988-REJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 28, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Charles McManama appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against three Clackamas County Commissioners. In his complaint, McManama appears to allege that Clackamas County Commissioners, acting on behalf of Clackamas County, acted improperly in seizing his personal and/or real property. We agree with the district court that the complaint, which McManama failed to amend after having been advised to do so, fails to set forth any cognizable theory and fails to provide defendants with notice regarding the nature of the claims against them. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of the action. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) (requiring that a complaint contain a “short and plain statement” showing that the pleader is entitled to relief); *McKeever v. Block,*932 F.2d 795, 798 (9th Cir.1991) (complaint must give defendants fair notice of the claims against them).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.