alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1113

To amend the Small Business Act to direct the Administrator of the Small

Business Administration to establish an office within the Administration

to conduct oversight of certain loan programs, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to establish

an office within the Administration to conduct oversight

of certain loan programs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Loan

5 Oversight Improvement Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN OVERSIGHT OFFICE.

7 The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637 et seq.) is

8 amended—
2

•HR 1113 IH

1 (1) by redesignating section 36 as section 37;

2 and

3 (2) by inserting after section 35 the following

4 new section:

5 ‘‘SEC. 36. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN OVERSIGHT OFFICE.

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with this section,

7 the Administrator of the Small Business Administration

8 shall establish an office within the Administration to con9 duct oversight of the loan programs authorized by section

10 7(a) (in this section referred to as the ‘loan programs’).

11 ‘‘(b) DUTIES.—The duties of the office established

12 under subsection (a) shall include—

13 ‘‘(1) collection and analysis of data related to

14 loans made under the loan programs;

15 ‘‘(2) identification of any abuse with respect to

16 the loan programs;

17 ‘‘(3) identification of any unnecessary financial

18 risk to the United States arising from the loan pro19 grams; and

20 ‘‘(4) collection and analysis of data with respect

21 to the compliance of lenders participating in the loan

22 programs with the Small Business Administration’s

23 program policies.

24 ‘‘(c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after

25 the date of enactment of the Small Business Loan Over-
3

•HR 1113 IH

1 sight Improvement Act, and annually thereafter, the Ad2 ministrator of the Small Business Administration shall

3 transmit to the Committees on Small Business and Gov4 ernment Reform of the House of Representatives, and the

5 Committees on Small Business and Governmental Affairs

6 of the Senate, a report containing—

7 ‘‘(1) data and analysis with respect to loans

8 made under the loan programs during the reporting

9 period;

10 ‘‘(2) any recommendations for improving the

11 loan programs, reducing abuse of the loan programs,

12 or reducing the financial risk to the United States

13 under the loan programs;

14 ‘‘(3) data and analysis with respect to lenders

15 participating in the loan programs; and

16 ‘‘(4) any other information relevant to congres17 sional oversight of the loan programs.’’

Æ
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00255-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E. AND A.E.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 360th District Court

of Tarrant County (360-714065-22)

November 16, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17



                               KAYDON CORPORATION
                     2004 CASH BONUSES TO EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

         On February 15, 2005, the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of
the Board of Directors of Kaydon Corporation (the "Company") exercised its
discretion to approve the payment of fiscal year 2004 annual cash bonuses for
the Company's named executive officers in the following amounts: Brian P.
Campbell, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer -- $420,000; John R.
Emling, Senior Vice President-Operations -- $183,000; Peter C. DeChants, Vice
President-Corporate Development and Treasurer -- $162,000; John F. Brocci, Vice
President-Administration and Secretary -- $112,440; and Kenneth W. Crawford,
Vice President and Corporate Controller -- $111,000.

         Annual bonuses for 2004 for the executive officers were determined
based on the Committee's evaluation of (1) the Company's results for the 2004
fiscal year, including revenue, earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT),
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA),
earnings per share, asset management, net income, productivity improvements,
return on capital employed and cash flow returns, (2) the individual executive
officer's contribution to those results, and (3) competitive pay practices. On
the final point, the Committee considered the fact that, with the exception of
Mr. Emling who received cash bonuses for 2000 and 2001 related to his prior
position as President of the Company's Specialty Bearings Products Group, the
named executive officers had not received cash bonuses since 1999.
Case 1:05-cr-00270-JD   Document 21   Filed 03/27/08   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,679,634
<SECURITIES>                                 5,899,896
<RECEIVABLES>                                  925,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,959,236
<PP&E>                                      86,742,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                 628,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             110,276,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,043,050
<BONDS>                                     50,064,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       23,652,272
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,250
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,426,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               110,276,477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,769,850
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,233,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (351,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (351,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (351,860)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
exv10w28



 






EXHIBIT 10.28




Officer Compensation

2004




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Salary	 	 	Bonus	 
	Name	 	Amount	 	 	Amount	 
	Sheldon Bernstein,
	 	$	172,000	 	 	$	25,000	 
	Executive Vice President

of Midwest Bank and Trust Company	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Edward H.
Sibbald,
	 	$	184,000	 	 	$	15,000	 
	Executive Vice President

of Midwest Bank and Trust Company	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Daniel R. Kadolph,
	 	$	143,000	 	 	$	15,000	 
	Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mary M. Henthorn,
	 	$	170,000	 	 	$	25,000	 
	Executive Vice President

of Midwest Bank and Trust Company	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






Each of the officers listed above have been granted a transitional employment agreement and
participate in the supplemental executive retirement plan.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Archstone Communities Trust

Gentlemen:

Re: Registration Statements Nos. 333-31031, 333-31033, 333-31405, 333-42283,
333-43723, 333-24035, 333-44639, 333-51139, 333-60815, 333-60817 and 333-60847.

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 30, 1998, except as to
Note 9 which is as of November 10, 1998 related to our review of interim
financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared by an accountant within the meaning of sections
7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
November 16, 1998

                                      39
Case 1:05-cv-00378-JD Document 32-3 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:05-cv-00378-JD Document 32-3 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:05-cv-00378-JD Document 32-3 Filed 12/04/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:05-cv-00378-JD Document 32-3 Filed 12/04/06 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Charles Glenn

v. Civil No. 06-cv-99-JD

James O’Mara, et al.

O R D E R

Charles Glenn brought a civil rights case against the

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections and individual

officers at the jail. On May 29, 2008, the court informed Glenn

that his claims against Captain Dempsey would be dismissed

without prejudice unless he showed good cause for his failure to

make service on Dempsey on or before June 4, 2008. Glenn has

failed to comply with the court’s order, and therefore, Glenn’s

claims against Dempsey are dismissed without prejudice. 

 At the pretrial conference held on June 4, 2008, Glenn’s

counsel and defense counsel agreed that they would discuss the

case in order to determine if any claims and/or defendants would

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 68 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 2
2

be dismissed from the case. Therefore, Glenn shall notify the

court by Monday June 9, 2008, which, if any, claims and/or

defendants are to be dismissed from the case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

June 5, 2008

cc: Heidi A. Bean, Esquire

John A. Curran, Esquire

Harold J. Friedman, Esquire

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esquire

Michael J. Sheehan, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00099-JD Document 68 Filed 06/05/08 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                      SUMMARY OF PVC CONTAINER CORPORATION
               LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

      On December 10, 2004, the board of directors of PVC Container Corporation
(the "Company") approved a long-term management incentive compensation program
(the "Long-Term Program") that entitles the Company's key management personnel
to a one-time cash payment equal to a percentage of the incremental equity value
of the Company in the event there is change in control of the Company. The
following management personnel are eligible to participate in the Long-Term
Program: the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, vice
president - operations, vice president - quality, vice president - sales and
vice president - marketing.

      There is no formally adopted plan document for the Long-Term Program.

      The range of payouts per participant for the fiscal year 2005 under the
Long-Term Program is 0.6% to 3.5% of the incremental equity value of the
Company, which is based on the Company's earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Stephen P. Reynolds, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.











Date:  May 4, 2010/s/Stephen P. ReynoldsStephen P. ReynoldsPresident and

Chief Executive Officer
#### PACIFIC FIRE INS. CO. v. EUNICE MOTOR CAR CO., Inc.

No. 3242.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 29, 1950.

Bass & Brame, Lake Charles, for appellant.

C. F. Boagni, Jr., Opelousas, L. B. San-doz, Jr., Opelousas, for appeUce.

PER CURIAM.

In its application for rehearing, the defendant assigns two errors which it contends we mad'e in our opinion, viz.:

> (1) “in placing the defendant in the position of an insurer by holding it responsible, under' the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur where no negligent acts were proven, solely because the employees were unable to explain the cause of the fire” ;

> (2) the decision “is in conflict with the principle of law announced by the Supreme *Court*of Louisiana in the case of Davis v. Teche Lines, 1942, 200 La. 1, 7 So.2d 365.”

With reference to the first assigned error, we definitely state that we are not placing or attempting to hold defendant as an insurer. We are firm in our conviction that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in this case. As stated in the opinion, one of the employees, Gurvis Sonnier, testified that the fire, when first perceived, was underneath the truck on the floor and the flames were about two feet high and occupied an area of about two feet in diameter and that the substance burning, in his opinion, was gasoline. ' He was of the opinion that the gasoline burning on the floor had come from the fuel line which he had disconnected from the gasoline tank. Thus, we have a case where the employee confesses that he carelessly allowed a quantity of gasoline to be wasted on the floor of the garage, thus bringing about a similar situation as existed in the case of Jones v. Shell Petroleum Corporation, 185 La. 1067, 171 So. 447.

With reference to the second assigned error, a mere reading of that decision clearly demonstrates that it is not applicable to the case at bar. States the Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. Teche Lines, [200 La. 1, 7 So.2d 367] supra: “No hard and fast rule can be set, for the reason that the explanation must be governed by the peculiar facts and circumstances of *404each case. In many cases where' the doctrine is applied, specific acts of negligence are also proven, as in the case of- Jones- v. Shell Petroleum Corporation,'supra, where the employee carelessly wasted a quantity of gasoline. In cases of that nature, *the defendant would he required to not only re-hut the inference of negligence (Prising from the rule but to show that he was not guilty of the specific acts of negligence.”*(Emphasis ours.)

In the present case, defendant,, to our conviction, has not only failed to .rebut the inference of negligence, but has failed to show that it was not guilty of .negligence of having spilled a quantity .of gasoline on the floor and allowed it to remain thereon.

Rehearing refused.
Exhibit 32.b  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.  Dated: May 15, 2007/s/Larry Bruce
Larry Bruce
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer   The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### Alexander McLAREN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 8771.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1938.

Thomas N. Fowler, of Seattle, Wash., for petitioner.

James W. Morris, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of counsel for respondent, consented to by counsel for petitioner, ordered petition to review herein dismissed for failure of petitioner to file record ánd docket cause; that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens  Communications Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jerry
Elliott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Jerry Elliott
-----------------------
Jerry Elliott
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Citizens  Communications  Company
and will be retained by Citizens  Communications  Company and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SCPR-23-0000634

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

IN RE CHRISTOPHER J. BRIGGS, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna and Eddins, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judges

Leonard and Hiraoka, assigned by reason of vacancies)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the 

practice of law in the State of Hawaiʻi, filed by attorney 

Christopher J. Briggs, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the 

Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH), but to retain the 

paper license as a memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule 1.10(b), 

and the declarations submitted in support thereof, we conclude 

that Petitioner Briggs has fully complied with the requirements 

of RSCH Rule 1.10. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is 

granted. Petitioner Briggs may retain the paper license as a 

memento.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-23-0000634

20-NOV-2023

08:47 AM

Dkt. 7 OGP
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), 

that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, declaration, and 

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d) and (g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the 

name of Petitioner Briggs, attorney number 8757, from the roll 

of attorneys of the State of Hawaiʻi, effective with the filing 

of this order. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, November 20, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd A. Pittman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/TODD A. PITTMAN

---

Todd
A. Pittman
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Judith and Terry Robinson,

Gary and Brenda Fest,

Virgi nia Gray, and Butch



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 20, 2013

N o. 04

- 12

- 00754

- CV

John A. LANCE and Debra L. Lance

,

Appellant s

v.

Judith and Terry ROBINSON, Gary and Brenda Fest, Virginia Gray, and Butch To wnsend

, Appellee s

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 12

- 209

The Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Catherine Stone, C h ief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant's motion for rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of June, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court