alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1384 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1384

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 2001

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route in 
  Arizona and New Mexico which the Navajo and Mescalero Apache Indian 
 tribes were forced to walk in 1863 and 1864, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Walk National Historic Trail 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Beginning in the fall of 1863 and ending in the winter 
        of 1864, the United States Government forced thousands of 
        Navajos and Mescalero Apaches to relocate from their ancestral 
        lands to Fort Sumner, New Mexico, where the tribal members were 
        held captive, virtually as prisoners of war, for over 4 years.
            (2) Thousands of Native Americans died at Fort Sumner from 
        starvation, malnutrition, disease, exposure, or conflicts 
        between the tribes and United States military personnel.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(____) The Long Walk Trail, a series of routes which the Navajo 
and Mescalero Apache Indian tribes were forced to walk beginning in the 
fall of 1863 as a result of their removal by the United States 
Government from their ancestral lands, generally located within a 
corridor extending through portions of Canyon de Chelley, Arizona, and 
Albuquerque, Canyon Blanco, Anton Chico, Canyon Piedra Pintado, and 
Fort Sumner, New Mexico.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Adam H. DAVIDSON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 8309.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1938.

Geo. S. Atkinson, of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Charles H. Curl, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the joint stipulation of counsel filed herein on February 4, 1938, to enter the same judgment in the above numbered and entitled case as was entered by this court on July 16, 1937, in the case of Clifford Drake Davidson, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 5 Cir., 91 F.2d 516.

*1012It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decision of the said United States Board of Tax Appeals in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




June 2006


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presidential Documents

54281 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 182 

Thursday, September 18, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–23 of July 25, 2008 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Emergency Fund Drawdown to Assist Zimbabwean Refugees in South Africa, Botswana, Mozambique, and Zambia 

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 

United States, including sections 2 and 4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 

Assistance Act of 1962 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 2603) 

and section 301 of title 3, United States Code: 

(1) I hereby determine, pursuant to 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important 

to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, in an amount 

not to exceed $2.5 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and 

Migration Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting unexpected and 

urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment 

of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs of Zimbabwean 

refugees and asylum seekers; and 

(2) the functions of the President in relation to this memorandum under 

section 2(d) of the Act, and of establishing terms and conditions under 

section 2(c)(1) of the Act, are assigned to you, and you may further assign 

such functions to any of your subordinates, consistent with applicable law. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, July 25, 2008 

[FR Doc. E8–21964 

Filed 9–17–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                    <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998           JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      6,740                 6,740
<SECURITIES>                                    0                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              34,939                34,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                3,729                 3,729
<INVENTORY>                                 9,770                 9,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           54,937                54,937
<PP&E>                                    434,854               434,854
<DEPRECIATION>                            221,003               221,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            291,915               291,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      34,017                34,017
<BONDS>                                   159,332               159,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                     0                     0
<COMMON>                                       81                    81 
<OTHER-SE>                               (213,314)             (213,314)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              291,915               291,915 
<SALES>                                    26,424                 9,286 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          139,790                50,681
<CGS>                                      16,244                 5,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              76,742                26,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              804                   354
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         21,335                10,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (55,328)                  558
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (512)                1,289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (54,816)                 (731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                     0
<CHANGES>                                       0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              (54,816)                 (731)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (3.85)                (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (3.85)                (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                                     OF 1934


         The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Learning
Priority, Inc. ("Learning Priority"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report of Learning Priority on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained i n such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
Learning Priority. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to Learning Priority and will be retained by
Learning Priority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


   Date: June 5, 2008             By: /s/ Ian Rescigno
                                      --------------------------
                                      IAN RESCIGNO
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Covance Inc. (“Covance”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William E. Klitgaard,Corporate Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Covance,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Covance.

 

 
| Date:  | October 31, 2008 |   |                                  |
|-------------|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|        |                  |   |                                  |
|        |                  |   |                                  |
|        |                  |   | /s/ William E.  Klitgaard             |   |
|        |                  |   |  William E. Klitgaard            |
|        |                  |   |  Corporate Senior Vice President |
|        |                  |   |  and Chief Financial Officer     |
|        |                  |   |  (Principal Financial Officer)   |

 

----
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31,2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofOctober 24, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject ofthe Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: 
/s/ Marc Womack
Name: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: 
/s/ Erik Laney
Name: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
#### Erlinda Ongkingco BALUYOT, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-71162. Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*622Submitted July 17, 2008.*

Decided July 21, 2003.

Before REINHARDT, SILER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Petitioner Erlinda Baluyot appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s order denying her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and voluntary departure.1

First, Baluyot argues that the BIA abused its discretion in finding that she did not establish a “well-founded fear” of persecution. Neither Baluyot’s fear of a perceived general climate of political violence in the Philippines, nor her experience as a bank employee during the two robbery incidents, qualifies her for asylum. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001); *Sanchez-Trujillo v. INS,*801 *623F.2d 1571, 1581 (9th Cir.1986). Because Baluyot has failed to prove a well-founded fear of persecution on account of one of the enumerated grounds, *see*INA § 101(a)(42)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A), we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying her petition for asylum. We also conclude that Baluyot does not meet the requirements for mandatory withholding of removal, INA § 241(b)(3), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3), because an alien who fails to establish a “well-founded fear” of persecution will, by definition, fail to show a “clear probability” of persecution. *Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir. 1995).

Second, Baluyot contends that the BIA abused its discretion in denying her request for voluntary departure, INA § 240B(b), 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(b), on the basis of her having an expired passport. We have no jurisdiction to review this determination. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); *Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir.2002).2

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. The Immigration Judge also found that Baluyot was not eligible for cancellation of removal under INA § 240(A)(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Baluyot concedes that *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510 (9th Cir.2001) is dispositive here, and she does not challenge this finding in the instant appeal.

With respect to other factual and procedural details about the case, this history is abbreviated because the parties are acquainted with these aspects of the case.

2

. We do not reach the question of whether habeas corpus would allow this Court’s review of the voluntary departure issue. *See Flores-Miramontes v. INS,*212 F.3d 1133, 1137-38 (9th Cir.2000).
INMATE REQUEST SLIP

Submit this request to the Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant, or CC/CM . Your Unit Supervisor, Security

Lieutenant, or CC/CM will help you resolve the issue or it will be forwarded to the appropriate person .

Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant, or CC/CM will be forwarded to you . /VLpJ~/bAy

TO: Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant, CC/CM

FROM : NCk WbtFF CMARIFf

Last Name First Name

C VISIDAi( /AFacility Housing Unit O

I MATE RE EST: G© G DM O nN/ti

S

Work/Shift

Pl.@ASE ME A DVi.iFD PJlA-t 7'1tvN(H Tb hLV V eun 7,V)G)

CAVE tl

t! d

R

Ct~i -A,H51 TAc . . AT 0 A _ 14A v A J . !/ 0C M . T AFIM P

,

CALL MA - _ 11AT 3 T~a? C-)bG.C 7I►M6 .r h. Mv)n E,

fltl A Pe G tY'G - WAY TC-tG Na v A/o E€4t4k.t' FS A 1V1r. T Tl-JA/VK Ve-t. C37

C ( F+{ C

(If yqu need more space, use plain paper.)

o ~ r p~~

TO~ ~K R a,:g rTA C /a KITC ©

FROM : Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant or CC/CM

nKae e S g na

DATE: 1& ~ o~--

REMARK5: ,~~,~~(

, ~~

~~, S

VSot~

taff Signature

&~CClU E i C-0hy-<P1 h2~

LI'-'z- nT F- 1~ 4-9 N 1 VP a. 0 o ),

FJ k U,T t plip9uU'

DATE • ` ' 3'a007

ID #: aMae ,

Middle Initial p/11¢' .r- 1„6F a

White - Offender Records Office Yellow - Inmate Pink - Staff SP-014 (a) Rev. 11/06

Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 55-1 Filed 09/17/07 Page 1 of 3
INMATE REQUEST SLIP

Submit this request to the Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant, or CC/CM. Your Unit Supervisor, Security

Lieutenant, or CC/CM will help you resolve the issue or it will be forwarded to the appropriate person .

Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant, or CC/CM will be forwarded to you .

TO: Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant, CC/CM

F RO M : AO% Il. W a l F P CPA.A lst

Last Name First Name

❑

AT

or

o-r

#A 0.0

Facilit

REQUEST

❑

Housing U

D AA

9

Middle Initial

aD Cell

- t~ t F

V l

a C f

4 r-l

~ Cc -

Shift

~l /Y6. VS

zc[6_S U o.rsG LL C a tJA T QA D 99

F

A ,

' . ~rcr ~t~° .ai~~~~,V ° ~ ~~ Ter~67

(If you need more space, use plain paper.)

0

C

~TO L~

FROM : Unit Supervisor, Security Lieutenant or CC/CM

C~ ~ bucrA/~

DATE:

eS na t

REMARKS:

Staff Signature

FROMZ~1-K~LC-C9 DATE : -4?=l© -© 7

REMA

Trh J9z R,t1Th~ 0. o 3

VT, 0 t~'l~c.T C au4~r

rvti a ,4V ©A)c

DATE•q"3 ^ ;L0a?

ID #•ay3a z

)V,qCE aoFO'k

White - Offender Records Office Yellow - Inmate Pink - Staff SP-014 (a) Rev. 11/06

Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 55-1 Filed 09/17/07 Page 2 of 3
DATE : J G p T~ t'~ ~i~~ L 3 7"N a o o~

NAME ; w 4 (- Fr- u. D E D 4 n7A4 aKr o lz

C,1,1rJ~ ~tutivDc~ - 1 : o6- cv-31-1

~oCuM~uT uuA~ I F-A - l8

C oA07c7laV

Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 55-1 Filed 09/17/07 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Comcast of Maine/New Hampshire, Inc.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-142-JM

Joseph F. Slater, Jr.

O R D E R

 A settlement conference was scheduled on September 18, 2006

at 10:30 a.m. Mr. Slater appeared on time. Mr. McLaughlin never

showed up. Mr. Shapiro showed up 40 minutes late and only after

he was called at home. He had no file and no knowledge of the

underlying facts. 

Mr. Shapiro is sanctioned and fined $500.00 for his late

appearance and being unprepared. 

Mr. McLaughlin is fined $1,000.00 for failing to appear as

ordered. 

Additionally, the court has scrutinized the complaint and

inquired of defendant on the record as to (1) whether he

contracted for the five boxes; (2) when they were turned in; and

(3) what generally happened. He indicated that he had not lived

in the house for fifteen (15) years before his wife (who occupied

the house) died in May of 2002. The house was cleaned out and

Case 1:06-cv-00142-JM Document 11 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 3
2

some items put in storage. Among the items in storage were the

five (5) boxes. When he got around to terminating utilities

plaintiff demanded the return of the five boxes provided to the

house by its predecessor. Some time after Mr. Slater turned the

boxes in, he believes that to have occurred in the winter of

2002-2003, plaintiff claimed that three of the boxes were

altered. 

Comcast was told all of the above by Mr. Slater after it

demanded $3,000.00. He heard nothing further until after three

years when he was sued. The phraseology of paragraphs 13 and 15

suggest that counsel and Comcast (1) have no evidence as to who

modified the devices and (2) they knew that the three year

statute of limitations had expired before the date of suit. 

Counsel and Comcast are ordered to show cause why they should not

be sanctioned under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure: 

(a) on or before September 29, 2006 they shall

file all written evidence in support of the

complaint, including but not limited to contracts

for the devices, records of rental payments for

service for the two years prior to termination,

all records showing surrender of the devices and

all records of examination; 

(b) on or before September 29, 2006 Comcast,

Attorney McLaughlin and Attorney Shapiro

Case 1:06-cv-00142-JM Document 11 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 3
3

shall each file a written explanation of why

they should not be sanctioned or a statement

of what a fair sanction should consist; 

(c) a Rule 11 Sanction hearing will be held

on October 11, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. 

The outstanding fines are to be paid by September 29, 2006. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 18, 2006

cc: John M. McLaughlin, Esq.

 R. Peter Shapiro, Esq.

 Joseph F. Slater, Jr., pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00142-JM Document 11 Filed 09/18/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2002,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Mark E. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund
Management  XXI,  Inc.,  the  Managing  General  Partner  of  the
Partnership,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Mark E Larson
                               Mark E. Larson, Chief Financial Officer
                               AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               November 1, 2002