alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND  IS  QUALIFIED
IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,742,713
<SECURITIES>                                     5,987,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,441,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                       934,501
<INVENTORY>                                         47,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,453,306
<PP&E>                                           2,881,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,767,346)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,994,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,484,079
<BONDS>                                            239,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            73,812
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,533,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,994,752
<SALES>                                          2,044,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,931,396
<CGS>                                              664,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,939,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,893,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,901,730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,653,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,653,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.50)
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry BLUMENTHAL, aka Laurent Blumenthal, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50579. D.C. No. CR-02-00216-SVW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 18, 2003.

Decided Aug. 6, 2003.

Before NOONAN, KLEINFELD, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Larry Blumenthal was charged in a one-count indictment of possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2252A(a)(5)(B). The district court denied *736his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the execution of a search warrant at his residence. Blumenthal then pleaded guilty to the one-count indictment pursuant to a conditional plea agreement in which he preserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress.

The search warrant at issue states that there is probable cause to believe that property in Blumenthal’s home would show that “sexual exploitation of a child in violation of California Penal Code § 311.3 or depiction of sexual conduct of a person under 18 in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11 has occurred or is occurring.” Blumenthal claims that nowhere in the affidavit attached to the warrant is there any statement that suggests that he was sexually attracted to children or would possess child pornography.

This argument underrepresents the relevant attested facts. The affidavit recites the following statements made by a 14 year old guest in Blumenthal’s home: he used the bathroom five times and each time he went to the bathroom, Blumenthal went to his computer in a room adjacent to the upstairs bathroom; defendant told the boy to use the squeegee to clean the interi- or of the glass shower after taking a shower and when he told defendant he had done so, Blumenthal replied, “yes, I know you did;” he saw an image of the upstairs bathroom on Blumenthal’s computer screen; he took photos of a motion detector in defendant’s bathroom; and his 21-year-old cousin had told him not to spend the night at Blumenthal’s house. The affidavit also states that the youth’s cousin claims that eight years earlier he saw a live image of his friend getting out of the shower on a T.V. set in defendant’s bedroom.

These attested facts, taken together, provide fair probability that evidence of a violation of California Penal Code § 311.3 or § 311.11 would be found in Blumenthal’s home. *See Illinois v. Gates,*462 U.S. 213, 238-39, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). As the district court did not clearly err in its findings of fact and conclusions of law, both the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress and the judgment of conviction are AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Linens 'n Things, Inc.
Clifton, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:     Registration Statements Numbers 333-116719, 333-116720, 333-71903,
        333-42874, 333-55803, 333-62982 and 333-62984 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 29, 2004, except as to
Note 2 which is as of June 30, 2005, related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm or a report prepared or certified
by an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm within the meaning of
sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.




/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
July 1, 2005


                                       36
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the 1933 Act
    Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193274) and Amendment No. 697 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the
    consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under
    individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  August 22, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Covance
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0001023131
<NAME>                             Covance Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                                      US$
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                   1
<CASH>                                                   20,073,000
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           194,941,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                              25,264,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        287,250,000
<PP&E>                                                  446,376,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          203,621,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          627,489,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   191,980,000
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                    586,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              238,907,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            627,489,000
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        210,632,000
<CGS>                                                   141,430,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           186,466,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            (80,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        1,986,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          22,260,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                              9,112,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      13,148,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                             13,148,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.22

        

</TABLE>
#### CALLIHAN v. MONSOUR.

No. 7164.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 1, 1948.

Booth, • Lockard & Jack, of. Shreveport, for appellant.

Foster, Hall & Smith, of Shreveport, for appellee.

HARDY, Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant are owners of adjoining lots of land located on the shores of Cross Lake in Caddo Parish. In this action plaintiff seeks to have an order issued against defendant decreeing the removal of certain structures erected in the lake below the 172 foot contour line, consisting of piling, walks, a boat house, etc., which, it is alleged, interfere with plaintiff’s use and enjoyment, of his property and the water rights appertaining thereto.

In this Court counsel for plaintiff and defendant have filed a motion praying that the judgment of the District Court be set aside and this cause remanded to said court for further proceedings consistent with a written stipulation signed by the parties plaintiff and defendant which is attached to and made a part of said motion.

We deem it unnecessary to detail the provisions of the written stipulation in view of the fact that there appears to be no ground for objection to the granting of the motion to remand. .

Accordingly, It Is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby set aside, and It Is Further Ordered that this cause be remanded to the First Judicial District Court in and' for Caddo Parish, Louisiana, for further proceedings consistent with the stipulation of the parties hereto. All costs to await final determination of this cause.
exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December 1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S. 4. Valued at current market exchange rates. 

3.13	 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1 

Millions of dollars, end of period 

2001 2002 

Asset 1998 1999 2000 

July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb.p 

1 Deposits .............................. 167 71 215 84 80 608 75 528 61 162 

Held in custody 

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 607,574 632,482 594,094 578,573 590,820 587,566 599,043 600,129 592,630 592,031 591,057 

3 Earmarked gold3 ....................... 10,343 9,933 9,451 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,099 9,099 9,099 9,098 9,098 

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional 3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not 

organizations included in the gold stock of the United States. 

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury 

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value. 

89
#### Robert Eugene SMOOT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44332.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 1972.

Joe Kegans, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James Brough and Andy Tobias, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from an order revoking probation.

On October 16, 1968, appellant waived a trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary. Punishment *282was assessed at confinement in the Department of Corrections for 5 years. Imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation. One of the terms and conditions of his probation was that he commit no offense against the laws of this or any other state, or of the United States.

On June 18, 1970, a motion to revoke probation was filed alleging that appellant violated the aforementioned term. A hearing was conducted on November 13, 1970, and the court found that appellant had violated such term of probation, reformed the judgment from five years to three years,1 and sentenced him.

The contention is that there was an abuse of discretion by the trial court in revoking the probation. He argues that there was an illegal arrest and an illegal search and seizure.

Houston Police Officer B. E. Frank testified that at approximately 9:40 P.M. on May 1, 1970, while on duty as a traffic patrolman, he saw the appellant near the intersection of Calhoun and Dowling Streets in Houston. The speed limit at that location was 30 miles per hour and, in his opinion, the appellant was exceeding the speed limit upon his approach to the intersection. Appellant suddenly applied his brakes “spinning his — sliding his tires on the pavement.” Upon being directed to pull over, appellant stopped his car and “made a motion to the floor.” He hurriedly approached the police car and “seemed excited, nervous.” After getting the appellant’s driver’s license, the officer went to the driver’s side of the car and saw on the floor board “an old rusty hunting knife and a Marlboro box of cigarettes.” He retrieved these articles and found 9 hand-rolled marihuana cigarettes in the Marlboro box.

Appellant and his girl friend, who was a passenger in the car, testified and admitted that the marihuana was found in the automobile but denied knowledge of the same. Appellant acknowledged that the hunting knife was his.

We conclude that the arrest and search and seizure were legal. No abuse of discretion by the trial court has been shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The court was authorized to reform the judgment since appellant had completed one-third of the probationary period of five years. See Art. 42.12, Sec. 7, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Casarez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 468 S.W.2d 412, note 1.
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the 1933 Act
      Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-174367) and Amendment No. 700 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 13, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible
      payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    

    

    

    

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Waika Arroyo

Criminal No. 06-cr-182-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

16) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 19, 2007

cc: Harry Batchelder, Jr., Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cr-00182-JD Document 17 Filed 03/19/07 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Pat V. Costa

v. Case No. 06-cv-413-PB

Marotta Gund Budd,

Dzera, LLC, et al.

O R D E R

This bankruptcy appeal presents the same issue that Judge

DiClerico recently resolved in a companion appeal. I have

independently reviewed Judge DiClerico’s carefully reasoned

decision, Costa v. Dreier, 2007 DNH 031, and agree that the

decision is correct. Accordingly, I adopt his reasoning and

affirm the Bankruptcy Court’s September 13, 2006 Memorandum

Opinion denying Pat Costa’s motion to intervene. The clerk shall

close the case. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 3, 2007

cc: Charles A. Dale, III, Esq.

David Himelfarb, Esq.

Thomas Pappas, Esq.

John M. Sullivan, Esq.

Joshua Menard, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00413-PB Document 32 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 2
Michael Sirota, Esq.

Deborah Notinger, Esq.

James Donchess, Esq.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court-NH Clerk

Geraldine Karonis, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00413-PB Document 32 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.1




 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“First Amendment”) is executed and agreed to by and among Nine Energy Service, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), Nine Energy Service, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Edward Bruce Morgan (“Executive”), effective as of August 30, 2019 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have heretofore entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of
November 20, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 9.11 of the Employment Agreement, the Company, Parent and Executive enter into this First Amendment in order to memorialize the amendment to the Employment Agreement set forth herein; and 

WHEREAS, the Company, Parent and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect a change in Executive’s position
with the Company and Parent, as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual
agreements set forth herein, the Company, Parent and Executive hereby agree that the Employment Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date: 

1.    Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor: 

“2.2    Positions. From and after the Effective Date, the Company shall employ
Executive and Executive shall serve in the position of President, Administration and Operations of the Company and Parent or in such other position or positions as the Board or the Company may designate from time to time, which may include providing
services to other members of the Company Group, as the Board or the Company may reasonably assign from time to time.” 
 2.
    Except as expressly modified by this First Amendment, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed and ratified. 

3.    By signing below, Executive acknowledges and agrees that Executive has entered into this First Amendment voluntarily
and nothing in this First Amendment (including the change in Executive’s position with the Company and Parent accomplished herein) shall constitute Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or otherwise give rise to any additional
rights under the Employment Agreement. 
  

  
 [Remainder of Page
Intentionally Blank; 
 Signature Page Follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this First
Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date. 
  

			
	NINE ENERGY SERVICE, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Ann G. Fox
	Ann G. Fox
	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	NINE ENERGY SERVICE, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Ann G. Fox
	Ann G. Fox
	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

	
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
	
	/s/ Edward Bruce Morgan
	Edward Bruce Morgan
	
	August 30, 2019
	Date


  
 SIGNATURE
PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 AMENDED
AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     UT
<CIK>                         0000081100
<NAME>                        PUGET SOUND ENERGY
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>       3,814,383
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>     216,187
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>          511,846
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>        0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                  682,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,224,576
<COMMON>                        856,388
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>       465,430
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>             71,923
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>  1,393,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           58,162
<PREFERRED>                     60,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>            1,920,792
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>              261,176
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>  283,833
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>   19,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>  1,227,872
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>   5,224,576
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>       2,165,004
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>            75,339
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>      1,853,063
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>      1,928,402
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>         236,602
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>              16,541
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>  253,143
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>        128,587
<NET-INCOME>                    124,556
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>     6,761
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>   117,795
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>        117,536
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>       109,530
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>          267,723
<EPS-BASIC>                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.38


</TABLE>