alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-73,178-12

IN RE ALBERT RANDOLPH, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 114-2075-07-N IN THE 114th DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 114th District Court of Smith County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Smith

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Smith County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: September 30, 3015

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-D-0372]


Global Harmonization Task Force, Study Groups 1 and 5; Proposed 
and Final Documents; Availability; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register of July 11, 2008 (73 FR 39968). 
The notice announced the availability of Global Harmonization Task 
Force documents entitled ``Role of Standards'' and ``Clinical 
Investigations.'' The notice was published with an incorrect document 
number. This document corrects that number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gadiock, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-215), Food and Drug Administration, 1350 
Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-2343.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. E8-15797, appearing on page 39968 
in the Federal Register of Friday, July 11, 2008, the following 
correction is made:
    1. On page 39968, in the third column, in the third paragraph, in 
the 8th and 9th lines, ``SG5(PD)/N37:2007'' is corrected to read 
``SG5(PD)/N3R7:2007.''

    Dated: September 11, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-22094 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Eugene Williams

Criminal No. 06-cr-161-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

15) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: February 20, 2007

cc: Richard Foley, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00161-JD Document 16 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1356

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that foods

containing spices, flavoring, or coloring derived from meat, poultry, other

animal products (including insects), or known allergens bear labeling

stating that fact and their names.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to

require that foods containing spices, flavoring, or coloring

derived from meat, poultry, other animal products (including insects), or known allergens bear labeling stating

that fact and their names.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Ingredient Right

5 to Know Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds as follows:
2

•HR 1356 IH

1 (1) Millions of Americans follow certain dietary

2 guidelines for health, religious, and cultural reasons.

3 These individuals depend on ingredient labels for the

4 information they need to abide by these guidelines.

5 (2) Under current regulations, food manufac6 turers are not required to identify the products used

7 in natural or artificial flavorings, colorings, or

8 spices, or some food additives.

9 (3) These additives often contain derivatives of

10 meat, poultry, other animal products such as insects,

11 and allergens (such as peanuts, tree nuts, fish, shell12 fish, eggs, milk, soy, and wheat).

13 SEC. 3. FOOD LABELING; REQUIREMENT OF STATEMENT

14 REGARDING SPICES, FLAVORING, AND

15 COLORING DERIVED FROM MEAT, POULTRY,

16 OR KNOWN ALLERGENS.

17 Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

18 Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is amended—

19 (1) in paragraph (g), by inserting ‘‘, subject to

20 paragraph (t)’’ before the period at the end;

21 (2) in paragraph (i), by inserting ‘‘, subject to

22 paragraph (t)’’ before the first period; and

23 (3) by adding at the end the following para24 graph:
3

•HR 1356 IH

1 ‘‘(t) If it contains any spice, flavoring, or coloring de2 rived from meat, poultry, any other animal product (in3 cluding insects), or a known food allergen unless its label4 ing bears a statement with appropriate prominence on the

5 information panel providing that fact and the name of the

6 meat, poultry, other animal product, or known food aller7 gen, respectively.’’.

Æ
sC-PTQ M$En r j

r

~4 a& G ~

C'NA N ~ c.1 a A~ \rV at.FF

SouT H D I vislr, 9--1 A

a9i AlottTH fTATe S TACET

C'oNCo A D, .ntN 0 33o f

2',';i~E?21 AI1~0 0

G a o D MOWNG. %TAIVj N Lt Hatt o11 ,rN\A t( ST1iRre

~V AGG DAhAW h,M v A N CA D `pCTV o 9A C. .

CCcNk.

AFT'C h TH G AGVlQ- W ulz E-► (J" 14 ontoA

AAAG- (ST>tA-M J u DCG DAMF.T TI, MV[1lM'"A D(1' Ai\ A`11U Et- o u1'sT`I~ 0 T- nAlNy \,Aj 0 A W otz T'NUu~Hz

XT IS CLEpt n THAT VX ItE() .STATCI P L1fA rr.T

'

C GUnT FIAJ T H ~ SAM r~:~ r G C-ItNGJ' o Iz 4 GAc-,F-ro

AN b NAMO A.f T D o

E C~A!' IE- n/bTFMY A (Tto hP \NA.3 NoTA4 EA 47

T o 41 PJE ' T AND S AAA A+F>oc. bo-ETt ( F O A A N\p AMP

A L.t. T) UC-o 1%k ~IT T b T H t

- V At c T E p S 7-ATG1 0 tJTXt c7`

CduAT A q p TT't J'TAP-F~ .

nr:J 1?E CTt~ u (~~ ~

~k 11~j"

Case 1:06-cv-00321-PB Document 57 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 1
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 29, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A2029. JAMES EDWARD BOYD v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On July 25, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than August 01, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 29, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3292-EM]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of 
Alabama (FEMA-3292-EM), dated August 30, 2008, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective September 3, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21772 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### Cecil GOODERHAM, Appellant, v. PONTE VEDRA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee. Katherine W. HEDSTROM, Appellant, v. PONTE VEDRA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Nov. 30, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
###### **Exhibit 32.1**

###### ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Covance Inc. (“Covance”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph L. Herring, Chairman ofthe Board and Chief Executive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Covance.

 

 
| Date:  | October 31, 2008 |   |                                |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                  |   |                                |
|   |                  |   |                                |
|   |                  |   | /s/ Joseph L. Herring               |   |
|   |                  |   |  Joseph L. Herring             |
|   |                  |   |  Chairman of the Board and     |
|   |                  |   |  Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |                  |   |  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Joseph A. Venezia,
do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify
on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2018 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D, as Issuing
Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)        A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision.



(ii)       To
the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 8, 2019.



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.
| | --------------------------



| | By: | /s/Joseph A. Venezia          
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name: Joseph A. Venezia       
| |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2006


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1427

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the issuance of

tax-exempt bonds for certain air and water pollution control facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. BENTSEN (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Texas) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for certain air and

water pollution control facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Air Investment

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR AIR AND WATER POLLU7 TION CONTROL FACILITIES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 142 of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining exempt facil10 ity bond) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of para-
2

•HR 1427 IH

1 graph (11), by striking the period at the end of paragraph

2 (12) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the

3 following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(13) air or water pollution control facilities

5 (within the meaning of section 103 as in effect be6 fore the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of

7 1986).’’

8 (b) BONDS IN NONATTAINMENT AREAS NOT SUB9 JECT TO VOLUME CAP.—Subsection (g) of section 146 of

10 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of

11 paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end of para12 graph (4) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by inserting after

13 paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:

14 ‘‘(5) any exempt facility bond issued during

15 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, or 2007 as part of an issue

16 described in paragraph (13) of section 142(a) (relat17 ing to air or water pollution control facilities), but

18 only if any facility which the proceeds of such bond

19 are to be used to provide is located within a non20 attainment area (as defined by section 171(2) of the

21 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7501(2).’’.

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

23 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date

24 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

p0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148377

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148377

COA: 316726

Mecosta CC: 08

- 006239

- FC

LEWIS CARL HURT, JR.

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Robert E. LOWREY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50307.

D.C. No. CR-00-01084-NM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Robert Lowrey appeals the judgment of conviction and 130-month sentence following his guilty plea to possession and transfer of unregistered firearms in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 and felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders *v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issue for appeal.

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant and the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Isaac Kier, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MPLC, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

March 10, 2006


/s/ Isaac Kier
----------------------
Isaac Kier
President, Secretary
Treasurer and Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

KEVIN L. BALLARD,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SHANE THURMAN, and DR. DANIEL 

DANAHER,

Defendants.

8:23CV178

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this matter on May 9, 2023, while he was 

incarcerated. The Court granted him leave to proceed in forma pauperis on May 15, 

2023, also while he was incarcerated. See Filing No. 7. Plaintiff filed a change of address 

on November 7, 2024, indicating that he is no longer incarcerated. See Filing No. 24. 

Since Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated, he must now file a new application for 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis if he wishes to continue pursuing this case in forma 

pauperis. Plaintiff may, in the alternative, pay the Court’s $405.00 filing and 

administrative fees. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff must either file a new request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

or pay the Court’s $405.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days. Failure to take 

either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice to Plaintiff.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO 240, 

“Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit.” 

8:23-cv-00178-JFB-PRSE Doc # 25 Filed: 11/22/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 121
2

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline 

with the following text: December 23, 2024: deadline for Plaintiff to file new IFP 

application or pay filing fee.

Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00178-JFB-PRSE Doc # 25 Filed: 11/22/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 122