alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1281 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1281

 To declare the policy of the United States with respect to deployment 
                 of a National Missile Defense System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2001

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To declare the policy of the United States with respect to deployment 
                 of a National Missile Defense System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Security Against Nuclear Enemies Act 
of 2001''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY.

    The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Director of the Ballistic 
Missile Defense Organization to design and deploy a land-based and sea-
based National Missile Defense system capable of defending the national 
territory of the United States against ballistic missile attack as soon 
as technologically possible.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROBERT VINCENT HARRIS, 

Defendant.

4:23CR3057

ORDER

Defendant Robert Vincent Harris has moved to continue the trial (Filing No. 

33). The Court held a conference with the parties on February 15, 2024 regarding 

this Motion. During this conference, counsel indicated Defendant has been unable 

to adequately discuss with his counsel alternatives to trial and trial strategy due to 

Defendant’s treatment regimen and status. Such barriers have been recently 

resolved. The motion to continue is unopposed. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s motion to continue (Filing No. 33) is granted. No further 

continuances will be granted absent a substantial showing of good 

cause.

2) The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. 

Gerrard, Senior United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United 

States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on April 8, 2024, or 

as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of four (4)

trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial. 

3) The time between today’s date and April 8, 2024, shall be deemed 

excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the 

Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel have been duly diligent, 

additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and 

failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1), (h)(6) & (h)(7). Failing to timely object to this order 

as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any 

4:23-cr-03057-JMG-JMD Doc # 35 Filed: 02/16/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 60
2

right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the 

Speedy Trial Act. 

Dated this 16th day of February, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03057-JMG-JMD Doc # 35 Filed: 02/16/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 61
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kathleen E. Brush, Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

| August 13, 2003 |   | /s/  KATHLEEN E. BRUSH                                                |
|-----------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |        |
|            |   | **Kathleen E. Brush**                                                      |
|            |   | **President, Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer** |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2266
In Re: LESTER STOVALL, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-303-PJM) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before W IDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lester Stover, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lester Stovall filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to allow him to amend his complaint and to certify himself and others as a class. We deny the petition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Stovall has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of August 28, 2018 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2018-3 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of May, 2019.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
#### Herbert TAYLOR and Gerald Thomas, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Jan. 21, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 19, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01330-CV

JOHN C. GOLFIS, JULIE NGUYEN, SEIKILOS HOLDINGS, LLC, AND SEIKILOS FX 

STUDIOS LLC, Appellants

V.

EDWARD “LANNY” HOUILLION AND HOUILLION FAMILY LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-13053

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Lewis

On July 24, 2013, the trial court granted its Amended Temporary Injunction at the request 

of appellee Houillion Family Limited Partnership. Appellants John C. Golfis, Julie Nguyen,

Seiklos Holdings, LLC, and Seikilos FX Studios LLC filed this interlocutory appeal challenging 

the temporary injunction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4). While the 

interlocutory appeal was pending, the trial court proceeded to trial and entered a final judgment. 

If, while on the appeal of the granting or denying of the temporary injunction, the trial 

court renders final judgment, the case on appeal becomes moot. Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield 

Radiology Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991). When a case becomes moot on 

appeal, the appeal is dismissed. Id.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

131330F.P05

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOHN C. GOLFIS, JULIE NGUYEN, 

SEIKILOS HOLDINGS, LLC, AND 

SEIKILOS FX STUDIOS LLC, Appellants

No. 05-13-01330-CV V.

EDWARD “LANNY” HOUILLION AND 

HOUILLION FAMILY LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-13053.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, 

Justices Bridges and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED AS 

MOOT.

It is ORDERED that appellees EDWARD “LANNY” HOUILLION AND HOUILLION 

FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP recover their costs of this appeal from appellants JOHN C. 

GOLFIS, JULIE NGUYEN, SEIKILOS HOLDINGS, LLC, AND SEIKILOS FX STUDIOS 

LLC.

Judgment entered this 19th day of August, 2014.
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.



|Dated: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/Edward Munden
Edward Munden
President & Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13A‐14(a) CERTIFICATION

OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Christopher J. Annas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Meridian Corporation, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10‐K of Meridian Corporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

|   |                |                                                      |
|--------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | April 10, 2020 | /s/ Christopher J. Annas                   |
|   |                | Christopher J. Annas                            |
|   |                | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Christopher Kafelelis

Criminal No . 06-cr-68-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

39) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : March 12, 200 8

cc : Patrick J . Richard, Esq .

Terry L . Ollila, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00068-JD Document 40 Filed 03/12/08 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation. 

# ACTION:

Announcement of Membership of the National Science Foundation's Senior  Executive Service Performance Review Board. 

# SUMMARY:

This announcement of the membership of the National Science Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is made in compliance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). 

# ADDRESSES:

Comments should be addressed to Director, Division of Human Resources  Management, National Science Foundation, Room 315, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Joseph F. Burt at the above address or  (703) 292-8180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The membership of the National Science Foundation's  Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is as follows: 

Kathie L. Olsen, Deputy Director, Chairperson. 

Anthony A. Arnolie, Director, Office of Information and Resource Management and Chief Human Capital Officer. 

Richard A. Behnke, Head, Upper Atmosphere Research Section. 

Deborah L. Crawford, Deputy Assistant Director for Computer and Information Science and Engineering. 

Penelope L. Firth, Deputy Director, Division of Environmental Biology. 

Deborah F. Lockhart, Deputy Director, Division of Mathematical Sciences. 

Martha A. Rubenstein, Director, Budget Division. 

Dated:  September 16, 2008. 

Joseph F. Burt, 

Director,   Division of Human Resources Management.

[FR Doc. E8-22005 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Earl COLE, d/b/a Cole & Sons, Appellant, v. SUNBEAM CORPORATION, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.

Sept. 26, 1956.

Eugene C. Heiman (of Myers, Heiman & Kaplan), Miami, for appellant.

Douglas D. Batchelor, Earl D. Waldin, Jr., Miami, Herman T. Van Mell (of Finn & Van Mell), Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee.to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule, 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to .the court from an examination of the,record that said motion is appropriate and, seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are *650without substantial merit and need no -further 'argument;

It is accordingly, Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed thát the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the sanie is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, G. J„ and HOBSON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,278] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration on August 11, 2008. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 19, 2008 (73 FR 48395).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of cold rolled sheet coils. 

New information shows that leased workers from Pro Unlimited were employed on-site at the Allenport, Pennsylvania location of Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation to be considered leased workers. 

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this revised determination to include workers leased from Pro Unlimited working on-site at the Allenport, Pennsylvania location of the subject firm. 

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all adversely affected secondary workers employed at Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, Allenport, Pennsylvania. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,278 is hereby issued as follows: 

“All workers of Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, including on-site leased workers from Pro Unlimited, Allenport, Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 21, 2007, through August 11, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.”

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of September 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-22126 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 4a

                            OHIO CASUALTY CORPORATION

                        CERTIFICATE OF ADJUSTMENT TO THE
                          RIGHTS ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE
                      AMENDED AND RESTATED RIGHTS AGREEMENT

This Certificate is issued pursuant to Section 12 of the Amended and Restated
Rights Agreement dated as of February 19, 1998, between Ohio Casualty
Corporation (the "Company") and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as
Rights Agent (the "Rights Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein without
definition shall have the definitions given to them in the Rights Agreement.

Each whole Right issued pursuant to the Rights Agreement currently evidences the
right to purchase one common share, par value $.125 per share, of the Company
("Common Stock") at a purchase price of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) per
share subject to the terms and conditions of the Rights Agreement. One-half of a
whole Right is currently attached to each outstanding share of Common Stock. As
a result of a two-for-one share split of the Common Stock (the "Stock Split") to
be effected by the Company on or about July 22, 1999, and by operation of
Section 11 of the Rights Agreement, each whole Right will evidence the right to
purchase one share of Common Stock at the adjusted purchase price of One Hundred
Twenty-Five Dollars ($125.00) per share of Common Stock. Following the Stock
Split, one-half of a whole Right will be attached to each outstanding share of
Common Stock, including the shares issued pursuant to the Stock Split. These
adjustments are necessary to maintain the economic equivalency of the Rights
after the Stock Split. The adjustments to the Rights described in this
Certificate will be effective upon the date of distribution of the Stock Split.

                                            OHIO CASUALTY CORPORATION

                                            By /s/ Lauren N. Patch
                                               -------------------
                                               Lauren N. Patch, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                            Dated: July 1, 1999