alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999             AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         258,739               1,073,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,970                 136,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    150,932                 201,555
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               670,323               1,420,284
<PP&E>                                       1,310,129               1,393,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,671                  56,949
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,791,898               4,447,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,558,208               1,812,503
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    269,325                       0
<COMMON>                                     3,488,665               2,620,782
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,791,898               4,447,720
<SALES>                                        295,853                 249,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,818,265              13,878,754
<CGS>                                          326,066                 166,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,848,478              13,795,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,389,709                 935,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,294                 210,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,537,887)             (1,120,256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,614                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,540,501)             (1,120,256)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,540,501)             (1,120,256)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.46)                  (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogue Wave
Software, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Merle A. Waterman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 14, 2003



/s/    Merle A. WatermanMerle A. Waterman Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

The Timberland Company

v. Case No. 06-cv-17-PB

Sportzone, S.A.

ORDER

Re: Document No. 2, Ex Parte Motion for Temporary

Restraining Order and for Preliminary Injunction

Ruling: The clerk shall set a hearing on the motion. The

hearing shall occur within the next seven days. The moving party

shall notify the respondent of the hearing.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

U.S. District Judge

Date: January 19, 2006

cc: Steven Grill, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00017-PB Document 5 Filed 01/19/2006 Page 1 of 1

The Timberland Company v. Sportzone, S.A. Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  in  connection  with  the  filing  of the
Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB  for the  Quarter  Ended  March 31,  2007 (the
"Report") by New Motion,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned  hereby
certifies that:

         1.       to the best of our  knowledge,  the Report fully complies with
                  the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       to the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the
                  Report  fairly  presents,   in  all  material  respects,   the
                  financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date:  May 15, 2007                          /S/ BURTON KATZ
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Burton Katz
                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 15, 2007                          /S/ ALLAN LEGATOR
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Allan Legator
                                    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54585-54586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL03-77-008; Docket No. RP03-311-006]


Enron Power Marketing, Inc., and Enron Energy Services, Inc., 
Bridgeline Gas Marketing L.L.C., Citrus Trading Corporation, ENA 
Upstream Company, LLC, Enron Canada Corp., Enron Compression Services 
Company, Enron Energy Services, Inc., Enron MW, L.L.C., and Enron North 
America Corp.; Notice of Filing

September 15, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 8, 2008, The Enron Parties and the 
City of Seattle filed a revised stipulation and agreement, pursuant to 
paragraph 4 of the Commission's August 29, 2008 Order, Enron Power 
Marketing, Inc., 124 FERC ] 61,206 and Rule 602 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.602.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.

[[Page 54586]]

There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to 
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea8abbcada1808287808bbd9b9e9e819c9aae888b9c8dc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="783e3d2a3b37161411161d2b0d0808170a0c381e1d0a1b561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on September 29, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22006 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT (“Third Amendment”) is made by and between the Regents of the University of New Mexico, a body corporate of the
State of New Mexico, as Landlord, and Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., as Tenant. 
 WHEREAS, in May 2013, Tenant entered into a
Lease with Landlord for space at 800 Bradbury Dr.SE known as Suite 108 (the “Lease”); 
 WHEREAS, in April 2014,
Tenant entered into a First Amendment to lease, exercising its First Option to extend the initial term of the Lease Agreement for six (6) additional months; 

WHEREAS, in November 2014, Tenant entered into a Second Amendment to Lease, to extend the initial term of the Lease Agreement
for six (6) additional months; and 
 WHEREAS, Tenant now desires, and Landlord agrees, to extend the Lease Term by six
(6) months. 
 NOW THEREFORE, Tenant and Landlord mutually agree and covenant as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 Landlord and Tenant agree to extend the Lease Term for six (6) months to commence June 1, 2015 and
expire on November 30, 2015. 


  

	 	2.	 The monthly rent amount shall remain, Four Thousand Two Hundred and Five Dollars and Thirty-four cents
($4,205.34). 


  

	 	3.	 All capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this Third Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them
in the Lease. 










	 	4.	 Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full
force and effect. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Third Amendment to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives. 
  

					
	 LANDLORD: The Regents of the University of New Mexico

			
	             
	 		 	 /s/ David W. Harris

		 	 By:
	 	 David W. Harris

		 	 Its:
	 	 EVP for Administration, COO & CFO

			
		 		 	 /s/ Bruce Cherrin

		 	 By:
	 	 Bruce Cherrin

		 	 Its:
	 	 Chief Procurement Officer

	
	     TENANT:    Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.,

			
		 		 	 /s/ Wendy Swedick

		 	 By:
	 	 Wendy Swedick

		 	 Its:
	 	 Chief Financial Officer




  
 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 06-cv-033-JD

Honda Accord 2000, et al.

PROCEDURAL ORDER

Nay Eth has filed a motion to appoint counsel along with a

financial affidavit stating that she has received notice

concerning the seizure of her house (document no. 30). Nay Eth

is not charged with any criminal offense. The government has

indicated that Nay Eth qualifies for appointment of an attorney

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 983(b)(2) because she has resided at 60

Sawmill Hill Road, Berwick, Maine, for at least the past year. 

She is a record owner of the property. 

Therefore, Nay Eth’s motion for appointment of counsel is

granted. The clerk shall arrange for counsel for Nay Eth with

the Legal Services Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(b)(2).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 19, 2006

cc: Nay Eth, pro se

Edward C. Dial, Jr., Esquire

Paul W. Pappas, Esquire

Brian T. Tucker, Esquire

Jean B. Weld, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00033-JD Document 37 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 1
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6912 

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to require 

that named fiduciaries collect contributions to pooled employer plans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. DESAULNIER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 

of 1974 to require that named fiduciaries collect contributions to pooled employer plans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pooled Employer Plan 

5 Fix Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6912 IH

1 SEC. 2. POOLED EMPLOYER PLAN FIDUCIARY REQUIRE2 MENT. 

3 Section 3(43)(B)(ii) of the Employee Retirement In4 come Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(43)(B)(ii)) 

5 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(ii) designate a named fiduciary 

7 (other than an employer in the plan) to be 

8 responsible for collecting contributions to 

9 the plan and require such fiduciary to im10 plement written contribution collection pro11 cedures that are reasonable, diligent, and 

12 systematic;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted
from the Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements. EPS-Diluted has been 
restated due to Archstone's implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting 
Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share".
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          5,570
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0 
<PP&E>                                      2,391,165
<DEPRECIATION>                                104,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,605,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                       833,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   244,350
<COMMON>                                       79,376
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,073,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,605,816
<SALES>                                       161,362 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              169,674
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  84,799 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             29,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                70,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            70,708
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   70,708
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.89
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-057-JD

Gordon Reid

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 340, Motion to Produce Discovery in re: Expert

Footprint Evidence

Based on the government’s response, the court rules as

follows: 

Paragraphs (i), (iv), (v), and (vi) - Government agrees,

as it has in the past, that it will make these items

available for inspection by defendant’s expert.

Government need not produce 4000 dpi negatives because it

does not have the capability of doing so. Furthermore,

this request is late. 

Paragraphs (ii), (iii) and (vii) - These items have been

or will be provided to defendant.

_____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: July 10, 2006 

cc: Gordon Reid, pro se

Michael J. Iacopino, Esquire

Helen W. Fitzgibbon, Esquire

Clyde R. W. Garrigan, Esquire 

Case 1:05-cr-00057-SM Document 365 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hews Company, LLC

v. Civil No. 04-cv-292-JM

Bruce Barnaby et al.

O R D E R

At the final pretrial conference held on August 5, 2005, the

parties made the following stipulations:

1. In accordance with the judgment that has been entered

on Count IV of the Complaint, the parties stipulate that

Defendants Bruce Barnaby and Barnaby’s Truck & Equipment, Inc.,

breached a contract with the Plaintiff Hews Company, LLC, and

that the Plaintiff’s damages were $446,775.00. The jury may only

include in any verdict that may be awarded after trial those

damages that the jury finds that the Plaintiff is entitled to

recover beyond the $446,775.00 that the Plaintiff incurred as a

result of the Defendants’ breach of contract. The jury shall not

include in any damage award the breach of contract damages

referenced herein.

2. The question of whether the Plaintiff should be awarded

attorneys’ fees, and if attorneys’ fees are awarded the question

Case 1:04-cv-00292-JM Document 41 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
2

of for what period of time, shall be determined by the jury. If

the jury finds that attorneys’ fees should be awarded, a

supplemental hearing will be scheduled and the Court will

determine the amount of attorneys’ fees that shall be awarded.

3. The Plaintiff will not call Attorney William S. Gannon

as a witness at trial if Timothy Keiter’s testimony does not go

beyond that evidenced in his deposition. Attorney Gannon is to

inform the Clerk whether the same stipulation will apply with

regard to Ken Linesman’s testimony by Tuesday, August 9, 2005.

In addition to the stipulations mentioned above, the Court

orders the Defendants to produce to the Plaintiff a privilege log

by Tuesday, August 9, 2005. The Court further orders the

Defendants to produce to the Plaintiff any documents in Attorney

Gannon’s file on this matter as to which no privilege claim is

being asserted by Tuesday, August 9, 2005.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 5, 2005 

cc: Timothy J. Bryant, Esq.

Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.

William S. Gannon, Esq.

 

Case 1:04-cv-00292-JM Document 41 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2
<Page>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.5

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the
best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.

                                               /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                               PSEG Power LLC
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               August 1, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Christopher Knight

Criminal No. 05-cr-241-09-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

195) filed by defendant Christopher Knight is granted. Jury Trial

is also continued as to defendants Virak Tin and Sothear Kim unless

counsel files an objection thereto on or before Tuesday, April 17,

2007.

Defendants Knight, Tin and Kim shall file waivers of speedy

trial rights within 10 days. The court finds that the ends of

justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: April 11, 2007

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

James Gleason, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

James Dennehy, Esq.

Mark Sisti, Esq.

Michael Smith, Esq.

Case 1:05-cr-00241-JD Document 196 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1290 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1290

 To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make such title 
   fully applicable to the judicial branch of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2001

  Mr. Jackson of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Blagojevich, Ms. Brown of 
 Florida, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Cummings, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Hastings of 
  Florida, and Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make such title 
   fully applicable to the judicial branch of the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judicial Branch Employment 
Nondiscrimination Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 717(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-
16(a)) is amended by striking ``those units of the judicial branch 
having positions in the competitive service'' and inserting ``the 
judicial branch''.
                                 <all>
```