alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-233-01-JD

Brendan Bottino

O R D E R

On August 3, 2006, defendant appeared for a “probable cause”

hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on four alleged violations of

conditions of supervision. Defendant waived his right to a 

probable cause hearing on the violations. I therefore find

probable cause to hold him for a revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee and that

he poses no danger to any other person or to the community. Here

defendant has demonstrated a substantial drug problem which he

has not controlled despite opportunities to do so. He is a

danger to the community. There are no conditions which are

likely to assure his presence and the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

Case 1:05-cr-00233-JD Document 7 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 3, 2006

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

 Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00233-JD Document 7 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven A. Swan

v. Case No. 06-cv-088-SM

Thomas P. Colantuono,

William E. Morse,

James W. Chapman, Jr.,

Roberta Keenan,

Donald Feith,

Paul J. Barbadoro,

and Unspecified Defendants

TRANSFER ORDER

All of the judges in this District are recused from

presiding over this case. Accordingly, the case shall be

transferred to the District of Rhode Island.

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

March 13, 2006

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

Clerk, USDC, Rhode Island

Case 1:06-cv-00088-ECT Document 4 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 1 of 1

Swan v. Colantuono et al Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1289 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1289

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit forced 
       overtime hours for certain licensed health care employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2001

   Mr. Lantos (for himself, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Solis, Mr. Bonior, Mr. 
 Frank, Mr. Hilliard, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. 
 Kildee, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Kucinich, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Lee, Mrs. 
    Napolitano, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Filner, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Baca, Mr. 
  Delahunt, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Borski) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit forced 
       overtime hours for certain licensed health care employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Registered Nurses and Patients 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. NURSES AND OVERTIME HOURS.

    Section 7(j) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
207(j)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``No employer'' and inserting ``(1) Subject 
        to paragraph (2), no employer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) An employer described in paragraph (1) may not require an 
employee covered by an agreement or understanding described in 
paragraph (1) who is a licensed health care employee (including a 
registered nurse but not including a physician) to work more than 8 
hours in any workday or 80 hours in any 14-day work period, except in 
the case of a natural disaster or while a Federal, State, or local 
declaration of a state of emergency is in effect in the locality in 
which such employee is employed. No such employer may discriminate or 
take any other adverse action against such an employee for declining to 
work more than 8 hours in a workday or 80 hours in a 14-day work 
period. Such an employee may voluntarily work more than 8 hours in any 
workday or more than 80 hours in a 14-day work period. Notwithstanding 
any provision of title 5 or title 38, United States Code, to the 
contrary, this paragraph applies to an employee appointed under either 
such title who is a licensed health care employee (including a 
registered nurse but not including a physician).''.
                                 <all>
```
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1100

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to improve the ability of

individuals and local, State, and Federal agencies to prevent natural

flood disaster.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. POMBO (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr.

RADANOVICH, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr.

SCHAFFER, Mr. LARGENT, Mrs. BONO, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. SKEEN, Mrs.

EMERSON, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. HERGER, and Mr. REHBERG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to improve

the ability of individuals and local, State, and Federal

agencies to prevent natural flood disaster.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

4 The purpose of this Act is to assist individuals and

5 local, State, and Federal agencies in complying with the

6 Endangered Species Act of 1973 in reconstructing or re7 pairing of flood control levee structures to address immi-
2

•HR 1100 IH

1 nent threats to public health or safety or catastrophic nat2 ural events and in maintaining the structural integrity of

3 those structures.

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF

5 1973.

6 (a) ACTIONS EXEMPT FROM CONSULTATION AND

7 CONFERENCING.—Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species

8 Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)) is amended by adding

9 at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(5) Consultation and conferencing under paragraphs

11 (2) and (4) is not required for any agency action that—

12 ‘‘(A) consists of reconstruction or repair of a

13 Federal or non-Federal levee structure—

14 ‘‘(i) to address a critical, imminent threat

15 to public health or safety; or

16 ‘‘(ii) to address a catastrophic natural

17 event; or

18 ‘‘(B) consists of maintaining the structural in19 tegrity of a Federal or non-Federal levee structure.’’.

20 (b) EXCLUSION FROM TAKINGS PROHIBITION.—Sec21 tion 9(a) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1538(a)) is amended by

22 adding at the end the following:

23 ‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, an activity of

24 a Federal or non-Federal person is not a taking of a spe25 cies if the activity—
3

•HR 1100 IH

1 ‘‘(A) consists of reconstruction or repair of a

2 Federal or non-Federal levee structure—

3 ‘‘(i) to address a critical, imminent threat

4 to public health or safety; or

5 ‘‘(ii) to address a catastrophic natural

6 event; or

7 ‘‘(B) consists of maintaining the structural in8 tegrity of a Federal or non-Federal levee structure.’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0371

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

WILLIAM JAMES PILLANS,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 17, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 9 2024

04/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0371
#### STATE v. CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE et al.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 11, 1936.

Murray Sams, of De Land, for the State.

E. N. Cahoun, of St. Augustine, and Thos. B. Adams, of Jacksonville, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a decree validating $113,000 of water revenue certificates to be issued by the city of St. Augustine, Fla., without an approving vot-e of the freeholder electors of the city, as is required by section 6, article 9 of the Constitution of Florida, as amended in 1930, when bonds of the city are issued.

The proceeds to be derived from a sale of the water revenue certificates are to be used for the necessary preservation and improvement and for necessary additions to the existing waterworks system of the city.

The water revenue certificates are to be paid solely from the revenue derived from the operation of the said waterworks system, and not otherwise.

The dqcree validating the issue of $113,-000 water revenue certificates to be issued by the city of St. Augustine for necessary improvements and additions to the existing waterworks system of the city without an approving vote of the freeholder electors of the city is supported by the pleadings and evidence adduced in the court below,-and the issue of such certificates not being in violation of section 6, article 9 of the Constitution, and being otherwise authorized by law, such decree should be affirmed on the authority of State et al. v. City of Miami, 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6; State v. City of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, 158 So. 300; Wilson v. City of Bartow (Fla.) 168 So. 545; Boykin v. Town of River Junction (Fla.) 169 So. 492; Kathleen Citrus Land Company v. City of Lakeland (Fla.) 169 So. 356; State ex rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell, No. 1 (Fla.) 169 So. 628; Williams v. Town of Dunnellon (Fla.) 169 So. 631, Bradley v. City of Homestead (Fla.) 169 So. 639, decided at this term; and other like cases recently decided.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and TERRELL,* BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

ELLIS, P. J.,

concurs upon the principle announced in his specially concurring opinion in the case of State ex rel. City of Vero Beach v. MacConnell (Fla.) 169 So. 628, filed August 3, 1936.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Arthur D’Amario, III,

Petitioner

v. Case No. 06-ds-145-SM

United States of America,

Respondent

O R D E R

All of the judges in this district were recused from

presiding over this case. Accordingly, the case was transferred

to the District of Maine.

The recusal of all of the judges on this court gives rise to

an “emergency” with respect to the transferred case as that term

is used in 28 U.S.C. § 636(f). I therefore concur in the

assignment of a Magistrate Judge from the transferee district to

perform the duties specified in 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)-(c).

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

May 1, 2006

cc: Arthur D’Amario, III, pro se

Clerk, U.S. District Court, RI

Clerk, U.S. District Court, ME

Case 1:06-ds-00145-SM Document 6 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Concurring Order

I concur that an emergency exists as specified above and

that for the duration of this case Magistrate Judge _____________

is assigned to perform such duties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)-(c)

as may be assigned to him by the District Judge to whom this case

is assigned.

______________________________

Chief Judge, Assignee District

Date:_________________________

cc: Arthur D’Amario, III, pro se

Clerk, U.S. District Court, RI

Clerk, U.S. District Court, ME

Case 1:06-ds-00145-SM Document 6 Filed 05/01/06 Page 2 of 2
Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ROBERT L. WITHEROW, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

c, .;L.pf

errie Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

On August 30, 2022, this Court entered an order remanding this matter to the District 

Court to make appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Defendant's 

Robert L. Witherow's constitutional speedy-trial claim, which had been denied without a 

written order. We stated that, upon entry of the District Court's order, Witherow would 

have 30 days to file a supplemental appellant's brief, and appellate briefing would continue 

thereafter in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

However, upon remand and consideration, the District Court "reluctantly concluded 

that dismissal of the misdemeanor charge against Mr. Witherow is justified" and granted 

his motion to dismiss. The District Court's order was entered January 11, 2023, and was 

provided to this Court on February 1. Later that day, the Clerk of this Court entered a 

notice that, in accordance with our order, Witherow had 30 days to file his supplemental 

appellate briefing. 

However, Witherow has now prevailed in the District Court. Further, the only issue 

he raised in this appeal was the speedy-trial issue. Thus, there is no need for the appeal to 

continue. We thus deem it appropriate to dismiss the appeal without prejudice to either 

party filing another appeal if they deem it necessary. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 
2 

Chief Justice 

Justices
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                   CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-HYB4
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HYB4


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In  connection  with the quarterly Report of Frontier  Communications  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Mary Agnes Wilderotter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mary Agnes Wilderotter


Mary Agnes Wilderotter


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


November 8, 2012











This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.





A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been  provided to Frontier  Communications  Corporation and will be retained by Frontier  Communications  Corporation and  furnished  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Albert BACRAC, Appellant, v. Clarence E. PREVATT, as Constable, District I, Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

June 25, 1954.

Charles C. Corees, Tampa, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and J. Ernest Webb, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed,' with leave to petitioner-appellant to amend his pleadings before the Honorable Henry C. Tillman, Circuit Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, in such manner as to create the issue of whether or not petitioner-appellant is a fugitive from justice in accordance with' the case of Kuney v. State, 88 Fla. 534, 102 So. 547.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 05-cv-381-JD

Cheshire County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, et al.

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation (Document #55) of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated February

6, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

March 7, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

John Curran, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00381-JD Document 66 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8717-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency is announcing the 2008 Fall Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC). This OTC meeting will explore options available for reducing ground-level ozone precursors in a multi-pollutant context. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 19, 2008 starting at 9 a.m. and ending at 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Tremont Grand Historic Venue, 225 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201; (443) 573-8444. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For documents and press inquiries contact: Ozone Transport Commission, 444 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 638, Washington, DC 20001; (202) 508-3840;                         *e-mail: ozone@otcair.org*;                         *Web site: http://www.otcair.org*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain at section 184 provisions for the “Control of Interstate Ozone Air Pollution.” Section 184(a) establishes an “Ozone Transport Region” (OTR) comprised of the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, parts of Virginia and the District of Columbia. The purpose of the Ozone Transport commission is to deal with ground-level ozone formation, transport, and control within the OTR. 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                 

*Agenda:*                     Copies of the final agenda will be available from the OTC office (202) 508-3840; by                     *e-mail: ozone@otcair.org*                     or via the OTC Web site at                     *http://www.otcair.org*.                 

Dated: September 11, 2008. 

Donald S. Welsh, 

Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. E8-21963 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21696]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5186-N-38]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: September 19, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: September 11, 2008.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E8-21696 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P