alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this
Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-Q/A of Powell Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Don R. Madison,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Don R. MadisonDon R. MadisonExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial and Administrative Officer


Date: December 9, 2011
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
        for the period ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being,
        Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
        January 23, 2006
 
 
 
 /s/
        Bruce Korman     /s/
        Edmund King_____
 Chief
        Executive Officer    Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
        or
        otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
        electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
        been
        provided to Cash Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Cash Technologies,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 73

 Providing for the appointment of Patricia Q. Stonesifer as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2001

  Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Matsui, and Mr. Regula) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Patricia Q. Stonesifer as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal of Michigan 
on December 7, 2001, is filled by the appointment of Patricia Q. 
Stonesifer of Washington. The appointment is for a term of 6 years and 
shall take effect on December 8, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 311-1 Filed 01/25/10 Page 9 of 9
#### Sam F. DAVIS, as Director, Beverage Department *of*the State of Florida, Appellant, v. J. J. NOLAN and Alberta Nolan, Husband and Wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 9, 1954.

■■ Appeal from Circuit Court, Escambia County; L..L.;Fabisinski, Judge.

Affirmed.
IIA 

Calendar No. 154 

107TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 51 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with 

respect to the products of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress approves the extension of nondiscrim4 inatory treatment with respect to the products of the 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

HJ 51 PCS 

1 Socialist Republic of Vietnam transmitted by the Presi2 dent to the Congress on June 8, 2001. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 

2001. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Calendar No. 154 

107TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 51 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatRepublic of Vietnam. ment with respect to the products of the Socialist 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53277-53278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21276]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council; Notice 
of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, that a meeting of the Route 66 
Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council will be held November 6 
and 7, 2008, in St. Louis, Missouri. The meeting on November 6 will be 
held from 8:30 to 2:30 p.m. at the Roberts Mayfair Hotel, 806 St. 
Charles Street, St. Louis, Missouri. The meeting on November 7 will be 
held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the Old Courthouse (part of the Jefferson 
National Expansion Memorial) located at 11 North 4 Street in St. Louis.
    The Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council was 
established to consult with the Secretary of the Interior on matters 
relating to the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program, including 
recommendations for ways to best preserve important properties along 
Route 66, recommendations for grant and cost-share awards to eligible 
applicants owning or administering historic properties along the Route 
66 Corridor, and recommendations for technical assistance provided by 
the National Park Service to partners along the route.
    The matters to be discussed include:

--Committee report on accountability and measurement
--Committee report on education and outreach
--Committee report on preservation management
--Strategic media initiative
--Report on preliminary economic impacts of heritage tourism along 
Route 66
--Report on motel preservation initiatives along Route 66

[[Page 53278]]

--Preservation of historic bridges along Route 66

    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited, and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The public 
comment period is scheduled from 9-10 a.m. on Friday, November 7. Any 
member of the public may file a written statement concerning the 
matters to be discussed with Michael Taylor, Route 66 Corridor 
Preservation Program Manager.
    Persons wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements, may contact Michael Taylor, Route 66 
Corridor Preservation Program Manager, National Trails System--Santa 
Fe, National Park Service, P.O. Box 728, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-
0728, telephone 505-988-6742. Minutes of the meeting will be available 
for public inspection at the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program 
Office, located in Room 122, Old Santa Fe Trail Building, 1100 Old 
Santa Fe Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Dated: August 25, 2008.
Michael Romero Taylor,
Designated Federal Officer, Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program.
[FR Doc. E8-21276 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EE-M
```
<PAGE>


         EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


The Board of Directors
Polaroid Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:      Registration Statements No. 33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on Form
         S-3, No. 33-51173 on Form S-8, No. 333-32283 on Form S-8, No. 333-32285
         on Form S-8, No. 333-67647 on Form S-3 and No. 333-96051 on Form S-3 of
         Polaroid Corporation

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 16, 2001, except as to
Notes 2 and 3 which are as of August 8, 2001 related to our review of interim
financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 ("the Act"), such
report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified
by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                      Very truly yours,

                                                      /S/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
August 8, 2001
#### UPSHAW v. HUNTER.

No. 6536.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1943.

*472Gahagan & Pierson, of Natchitoches, for appellant.

C. B. McClung and James A. Horton, both of Natchitoches, for appellee.

HARDY, Judge.

In this case there has been filed in this court on October 1, 1943, a stipulation dated September 4, 1943, signed by the attorneys for both plaintiff and defendant. This stipulation sets forth the fact that the defendant has obtained a discharge in bankruptcy; that the question involved in this suit is now moot; and that neither party will appear either by oral argument or in brief.

In view of the facts set forth in the stipulation referred to, accordingly, it is now ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellant’s cost.
#### LITTON v. WOODS et al.

No. 6579.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 2, 1944.

J. S. Pickett and R. A. Fraser, both of Many, for appellant.

Craig & Magee, of Mansfield, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff in this suit is seeking dissolution of a sale of certain real estate for nonpayment of the purchase price. She alleged in her petition that the notes given for the purchase price in the sales sought to be dissolved matured more than five years before the filing of this suit and have never been paid.

Defendants filed a plea of prescription of five years, based upon the theory that under Article 2561 of the Revised Civil Code, as amended by Act 108 of 1924, the right of dissolution is an accessory of the credit representing the price and prescribes with the prescription of the notes given as the price. The lower Court sustained the plea of prescription and dismissed the plaintiff’s suit. She has perfected an appeal to this Court.

Prior to the time this case was heard here, we passed upon a like question in the case of Louis Werner Sawmill Company v. E. J. White, 16 So.2d *666,*in which we sustained the plea of prescription. A writ of certiorari was granted in that case by the Supreme Court and on February 7, 1944, it rendered an opinion, 17 So.2d 264, reversing our decision and holding that Act 108 of 1924, amending Article 2561 of the Revised Civil Code, did not amend the prescriptive period of ten years applicable to actions to resolve sales of real estate, as provided in Article 3544 of the Revised Civil Code. The Supreme Court docket number of this case is 37,069.

It therefore follows that the judgment of the lower Court sustaining the plea of prescription of five years was erroneous and is now reversed and the case is remanded to the lower Court to be tried on its merits; cost of appeal to be paid by appellees and all other costs to abide the final determination of the case.
#### Chester A. HOAGLAND, Plaintiff-appellee, v. WYATT LUMBER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Incorporated, Defendant-appellant.

No. 6294.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 18, 1941.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1941.

J. S. Pickett, of Many, for appellant.

J. Reucl Boone and Olin D. Moore, both of Many, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion suit to No. 6292, entitled Miller v. Wyatt Lumber Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, 3 So.2d 565, decided by us this day. The cases were consolidated for trial below and here.

For the reasons assigned in No. 6292, the judgment of the lower court is now reversed and the demands of plaintiff are rejected at his costs in both courts.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-956-1910-07-5MMS; ES-055517 Group No. 180 Wisconsin]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin

T. 35 N., R. 12 E.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the west boundary, and a portion of the subdivisional 
lines; a corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of the west 
boundary, and a portion of the subdivisional lines; a corrective 
resurvey of the subdivision of section 20; and the survey of the 
subdivision of sections 15, 16, 17, 21, and 22, Township 35 North, 
Range 12 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, and was 
accepted September 5, 2008.

    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM 
receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to 
the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our 
consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: September 10, 2008.
Ronald J. Eberle,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. E8-21826 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1188

CHANEL E. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ELISA MARIE OMEECHEVARRIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:12-cv-00584-TSE-TRJ)

Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chanel E. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Bret Ramsdell, 

TYLER, BARTL, RAMSDELL & COUNTS, PLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chanel E. Taylor appeals the district court’s order 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting summary 

judgment in favor of the Appellee on Taylor’s complaint 

challenging the dischargeability of the underlying debt. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Taylor v. Omeechevarria, No. 1:12-cv-00584-TSE-TRJ (E.D. 

Va. filed June 10, 2013; entered Jan. 11, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1125 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1125

 To redesignate the Federal building located at 1 Federal Plaza in New 
      York, New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2001

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Federal building located at 1 Federal Plaza in New 
      York, New York, as the ``Ronald H. Brown Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RONALD H. BROWN FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 1 Federal Plaza 
in New York, New York, and known as the United States Court of 
International Trade, shall be known and designated as the ``Ronald H. 
Brown Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Ronald H. Brown Federal Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### McCOLLISTER v. POLICE JURY OF SABINE PARISH.

No. 6060.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 10, 1940.

For former opinion, see 197 So. 303.

*662Edwin M. Fraser, R. A. Fraser, and J. S. Pickett, all of Many, for appellant.

J. Reuel Boone and Olin D. Moore, both of Many, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Opinion was rendered in this case on April 4th and notice thereof was given counsel of record on that date by mailing a copy of the opinion and decree to each of them. 197 So. 303. The application for rehearing was filed by plaintiff-appellee on April 19th. Fourteen (14) days intervened between the date of rendition of the judgment (also of notice thereof) and the filing of the application. The application comes too late. We have no discretion in such a case.

Act No. 16 of 1910 provides that judgments rendered by the cottrts of appeal of the state, except in those cases arising in the city courts of the City of New Orleans, shall become “final and executory on the fifteenth [lSth] calendar day after rendition.” However, the Constitution, Sec. 24, Art. VII, ordains, with respect to the finality of judgments rendered by the courts of appeal, that: “Notice of all judgments shall be given to counsel of record; and the court shall provide by rule for the giving of such notices. No delay shall run until such notice shall have been given.”

This court has complied with the quoted constitutional requirement concerning notice of rendition of judgments by adoption of rule No. 9, which, so far as is now pertinent, reads as follows:

> “As soon as judgments are rendered, the Clerk of this Court shall deliver in person or by mail to counsel of record, a copy of the opinion and decree, and he shall make a record of the date and time of the giving or making qf such delivery, and this shall constitute the notice required by Section 24, Article VII of the Constitution.

> “The delay for filing applications for rehearing shall begin to run from the date of such notice, aqd shall expire with the fourteenth calendar day thereafter.”

Neither the day on which notice is given nor that on which the judgment becomes executory is counted in determining the fourteen (14) day period in which such applications may be timely filed. O. K. Realty Co., Inc. v. John A. Juliani, Inc., 157 La. 277, 278, 102 So. 399.

Therefore, the judgment of this court herein having become final and executory at the end of the fourteenth (14th) day (April 18th) following that on which notice thereof was given to counsel, the status thus acquired may not be affected by tardy filing of the application for rehearing.

For the reasons assigned herein, 'the rehearing is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, September 10, 2008, at 5 p.m. 

Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the matter will attend the Closed Meeting. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(8) and (9), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Aguilar as duty officer, voted to consider the item listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 10, 2008, will be: A matter related to a financial institution. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

      ( print page 53468)    
Dated: September 10, 2008. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-21607 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P