alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE

 322 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA

 BAR ADMISSION RULES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 825

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2020, upon the recommendation of the Board 

of Law Examiners, the proposal having been published for public comment in the 

Pennsylvania Bulletin at 49 Pa.B. 5700 (October 5, 2019):

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that Rule 322 of the Bar Admission Rules is amended in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and the 

amendments shall be effective in thirty (30) days.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, a
Maryland real estate investment trust (the Issuer), hereby certifies, that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q (the Periodic Report) of the Issuer for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 which
accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m(a)) and that the information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer. Date: May 3, 2005 /s/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR.Charles E. Mueller, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
**
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Pivotal Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company. 

 
Date: April 1, 2019    
/s/ Jonathan J. Ledecky
    Jonathan J. Ledecky    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)    
/s/ James Brady
    James Brady    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
 
**
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of Publix Super Markets, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2008 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, David P. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that on the date hereof:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David P. Phillips                
|David P. Phillips                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|August 7, 2008
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 ON MOTION F OR REHEARING

444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 NO. 03-05-00229- CV

Av r aha m Ra phae l, A ppe lla nt

v. Texas Depart m ent of Agriculture and Sysco Food Servic es of Hou ston, Appellees

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN402013 , HO NORAB LE PETER M. LOW RY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG
S U P P L E M E N T A L M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Avr aham Rapha el filed a motion for rehe aring complaining of this Court’s dis mis sa l of

his a pp e a l for wa

nt of jur isd ic tio n. Te x. R. Ap p. P. 42. 3( a ). Hi s mo tio n a sk s u s to a pp ly criminal law to his civil suit that seeks $43 milli on in damag es, g rant a new tria l, and appoint counse l to a ssist with his ne g lige nce and contra ct claims, which ar e base d on events that a lleg edly occur red in 1989, ag ainst the Texas Depa rtment of Ag riculture a

nd Sy sco F ood Service s of Houston. We do not gr ant appe llant’s reque sts because (i) the district c ourt’s order is no longe r subject to cha lleng e by

a motion for new

trial or appe al, seeTe x. R. A pp . P. 26 .1 , T e x. R. C iv. P. 32 9b (f ); and (i i) he ha s not sho wn that his is an “e xce pti on a l c a se [] in w hic h th e pu bli c and pr ivate i n t er es t s at s t ak e a re s u ch t h at t h e a dm i n i s tra t i o no f j u s t i ce m ay b e b es ts erv ed b y ap p o i n t i n g aI n any event, we note that the statute of limit ations may aff ect appellant’ s claims. SeeT e x. 1 Civ. P rac . & Re m. Code Ann. §§ 16.003(a) , .004(a) (West 2002). 2 lawy er t o repr esent a

n indige nt civil lit iga

nt.” SeeTex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 24.016 (West 2004); Sp ige ne r v . W

all is , 80 S.W .3d 174, 183 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.) ( citing Travelers Inde m. Co. v . M ay fie ld , 9 23 S.W. 2d 59 0, 59 4 ( Te x. 19 96 )) ; Coleman v. Lynaugh , 934 S.W .2d 837, 839 (Tex. App.—Houston [1s t Dist.] 1996, no writ). More over, he does not cite any part of the rec ord showing that he re quested the district court to appoint counsel a nd the cour

t denied his reque st. See Tex. R. App. P . 33.1.

Ap pe lla nt atte mpt e d to cha lle ng e a dis tr ic t c ou

rt or de r s ig ne d a

nd e nte re d o n Augus t 25, 2004, that dismiss ed his lawsuit as fr ivolous. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 14.003 (West 2002). As noted in our prior opinion, a ppellant’s deadline for pe rfe cting appea l has expired. SeeT e x . R
. Ap p . P
. 2 6
. 1
. B e c a u s e t h e d i s tr i c tc o urt ’ s o r d e r i s n o l o n g e r s u b j e c tt o c h a l l e n g e b y a mot ion fo r n e w tri a l or a

pp e a l, a pp e lla nt’ s r e me dy , if

any , li e s w itha

bil l of re vie w. Te x. R. C iv. P. 32 9b (f ); Caldwell v. Barnes , 154 S.W .3d 93, 96 (Tex. 2004)
. Acc ording ly , we ove rrule a ppellant’s 1
m o t i o nfo r r eh ea ri n g.

J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pury ear Filed: Nove mber 18, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of Publix Super Markets, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2008 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, David P. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that on the date hereof:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David P. Phillips                
|David P. Phillips                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|May 8, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

      ( print page 52944)    
Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA). 

*Date:*                     Thursday, October 2, 2008 (9 a.m. to 3 p.m., times may be adjusted).                 

*Location:*                     National Press Club Ballroom, 529 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20045.                 

Please note that this is the anticipated agenda and is subject to change. 

*Keynote:*                     Henrietta H. Fore, USAID Administrator and Director of United States Foreign Assistance, will speak on key issues before USAID and the foreign assistance community including the High Level Forum in Accra on Aid Effectiveness and the United Nations General Assemby. She will also address the draft recommendations of the ACVFA Subcommittee on Public Outreach.                 

*American Awareness of U.S. Foreign Assistance:*                     The ACVFA's Subcommittee on Public Outreach will provide its draft recommendations to the full Committee and the general public. A respondent will provide feedback to the draft.                 

                    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to attend the meeting can register online at                     *http://www.usaid.gov/​about_​usaid/​acvfa*                     or with Jocelyn Rowe at                     *jrowe@usaid.gov*                     or 202-712-4002.                 

Dated: September 8, 2008. 

Jocelyn M. Rowe, 

Executive Director, Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA), U.S. Agency for International Development.

[FR Doc. E8-21273 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
Exhibit 10.0


 





THE
SYMBOL “[****]” DENOTES PLACES WHERE CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT
IS BOTH (i) NOT MATERIAL, AND (ii) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED


 


FORM OF 


Loan
Extension Amendment


 


This
Loan Extension Amendment is effective as of this 31st day of July, 2019, by and between Ondas Networks Inc. (the “Company”)
and the undersigned lender (the “Lender”).


 


Whereas,
the Company is currently indebted to the Lender in the amount of $______________ including unpaid accrued interest thereon (the
“Indebtedness”), pursuant to promissory note(s) and / or any applicable loan agreement(s), as may have been amended
from time to time, by and between the Company and the Lender (the “Loan”); and


 


Whereas,
the parties wish to extend the current scheduled maturity date for the Loan and agree to certain other terms as set forth below.


 


It
is hereby agreed:


 


		1.	The
maturity date for the Loan is hereby extended to October 31, 2019 (the “New Maturity Date”), when the Indebtedness shall
be due and payable in full; provided that the Indebtedness may be paid, in whole or in part, at any time or times prior to the
New Maturity Date, in the Company’s sole discretion, and without notice, penalty or bonus; provided further, however that
if Ondas Holdings Inc. (the “Parent”) completes an equity offering of not less than $8,000,000 on or before the New
Maturity Date (the “Offering”) at an offering price per security of $[****] or less, the Lender shall extinguish the
Indebtedness in exchange for securities of Parent upon the same terms and conditions as investors in the Offering (the “Extinguishment
for Equity”) so long as Energy Capital LLC also participates in an extinguishment of all its principal debt and all unpaid
accrued interest owing under the Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Parent and Energy Capital, LLC, dated October
1, 2018 or otherwise, on the same terms as the Lender. Furthermore, the Lender may at its option extinguish the Indebtedness pursuant
to the terms set forth above if the offering price per security exceeds $[****]. The securities to be received in connection with
the Extinguishment for Equity is referred to herein as the Securities.



 


		2.	The
Lender shall enter into a lock-up agreement with the Parent to restrict the public sale of the Securities through September 30,
2020.



 


		3.	Any
defaults or penalties existing under the Loan as of this date are hereby waived.



 


		4.	Interest
on the Indebtedness will accrue and not be payable until the New Maturity Date.



 


		5.	All
other terms applicable to the Loan shall continue in full force and effect.



 


	COMPANY	 	LENDER
	Ondas
    Networks Inc.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	Name: 	Eric Brock,
    CEO	 	Name/As:
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF
 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
 
 I, Kee Chan Sin, certify that:
 
 (a) A review of Cellco Partnership’s activities and of its performance under the Transfer and
        Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2018 (the “Transfer and Servicing Agreement”), among Verizon ABS LLC, as depositor, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), marketing agent and
        custodian, and Verizon Owner Trust 2018-A, as issuer, during the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
        obligations under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019.
 
 March 30, 2020
 
 By:   /s/ Kee Chan Sin
 Kee Chan Sin
 Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
 Cellco Partnership, as Servicer of Verizon Owner Trust 2018-A
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6607 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6607

 To identify certain roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force Base and 
Travis Air Force Base, California, as defense access roads for purposes 
                  of the Defense Access Road Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2022

 Mr. Garamendi (for himself and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To identify certain roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force Base and 
Travis Air Force Base, California, as defense access roads for purposes 
                  of the Defense Access Road Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION OF DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS, BEALE AIR FORCE BASE 
              AND TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Certification.--For purposes of the Defense Access Road 
Program, the roads specified in subsection (b) in the vicinity of Beale 
Air Force Base, California, or in the vicinity of Travis Air Force 
Base, California, are hereby certified to the Secretary of Defense, and 
by extension to the Secretary of Transportation, as important to the 
national defense pursuant to section 210 of title 23, United States 
Code.
    (b) Roads Identified.--The certification made by subsection (a) 
applies to the following roads:
            (1) For Beale Air Force Base, California:
                    (A) Chuck Yeager Road.
                    (B) North Beale Road.
                    (C) Spenceville Road, also known as Camp Beale 
                Highway.
                    (D) South Beale Road.
            (2) For Travis Air Force Base, California:
                    (A) Air Base Parkway.
                    (B) Canon Road.
                    (C) Gate Road, including North Gate Road.
                    (D) Petersen Road.
                    (E) Vanden Road.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2



I, John Fowle, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended June 30, 2020 of Akerna Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



| | Date: October 28, 2020                      
| | --------------------------------------------
| |                                             
| | /s/ John Fowle                              
| | John Fowle                                  
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jack Vaughan

v. Civil No. 05-cv-223-JD

Bernice A. Ray

Elementary School et al.

O R D E R

Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, plaintiff Jack

Vaughan has filed a complaint, alleging that he has been

subjected to gender-based disparate treatment in violation of 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §

2000e et seq. By order of September 16, 2005, I concluded that

he sufficiently alleged a cause of action under Title VII and

ordered the complaint served on the defendants. See LR

4.3(d)(1)(B)(iii).

As plaintiff has completed a summons form for each

defendant, the Clerk’s Office shall forward to the United States

Marshal for the District of New Hampshire (“U.S. Marshal’s

Office”) the summonses and copies of the complaint (document no.

1), my previous order (document no. 4) and this order. Upon

receipt of the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s Office

shall effect service upon the defendants. See id.; Fed. R. Civ.

Case 1:05-cv-00223-JD Document 6 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 2
2

P. 4(c)(2).

 Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 4, 2005

cc: Jack Vaughan, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00223-JD Document 6 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 2
Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00337-CV

———————————

LORETTER BROCK, Appellant

V.

YANWEI CEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1106584

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this forcible-detainer action, appellant, Loretter Brock, appeals from the 

trial court’s judgment granting possession of certain real property to appellee, 

Yanwei Cen. We dismiss the appeal as moot.
2

The only issue in a forcible-detainer action is the right to actual possession of 

the subject property; “the merits of the title shall not be adjudicated.” TEX. R. CIV.

P. 746; see Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass’n, 349 S.W.3d 766, 768–69 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.). Therefore, although the failure to 

supersede a forcible-detainer judgment does not divest an appellant of the right to 

appeal, an appeal from a forcible-detainer action becomes moot if the appellant is 

no longer in possession of the property, unless the appellant holds and asserts “a 

potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession” of the property. 

Marshall v. Housing Auth. of the City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 786–87 (Tex. 

2006); see Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768; Gallien v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 

No. 01-07-00075-CV, 2008 WL 4670465, at *2–4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

Oct. 23, 2008, pet. dism’d w.o.j.) (mem. op.).

The record reflects that appellant did not supersede the judgment, a writ of 

possession was executed on April 2, 2018, and that appellant no longer has 

possession of the property at issue in the underlying forcible detainer action. On 

July 12, 2018, this Court issued a letter informing appellant that the record indicates 

that the appeal is moot because appellee now has possession of the subject property. 

We requested that appellant file a response to whether the appeal was moot. 

Appellant did not timely respond, and, therefore, has failed to assert a potentially 

meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property. See 
3

Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768; Soza v. Fed. Home Loan 

Mortg. Corp., No. 01-11-00568-CV, 2013 WL 3148616, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] June 18, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that appellant who failed to 

respond to appellee’s motion to dismiss had failed to assert potentially meritorious 

claim of right to current, actual possession).

Accordingly, we dismiss the case as moot. See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 785, 

787, 790; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 769; Bey v. ASD Fin., Inc., No. 05-14-00534-CV, 

2014 WL 4180933, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 11, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) 

(dismissing appeal of forcible detainer action as moot because appellant no longer 

possessed property at issue); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). We dismiss all other 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.