T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. T he pane luna ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L I N L I N , a . k. a . L i W e i H uang, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73177 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 390- 283 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L i n L i n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU L 19 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73177 2 unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo the a ge nc y ’ s l e ga l de t e rm i na t i ons and w e r e v ie w f

o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B I A ’s c o n c lu s io n th a t th e th r e a ts L in recei v edan dth e p ro p erty d am ag e h er fam i l y su fferedd i dn o test ab l i sh p ast p e r s e c u tio n . Se e Li m v . I NS , 2 2 4 F .3 d9 2 9 , 9 3 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( u n f u lf ille dth r e a ts d o n o t co n stitu te p er se cu ti o n ). S ub stan ti al ev id en ce also su p p o rts th e B IA ’s concl usi on thatL i n rea sonabl y c ou l d rel ocat e w i thi n C hi na, part i cul ar l y gi ven that p r io rto h e ra rr iv a l in th e U n ite dS ta te s , s h e liv e dw ith o u t an yp r o b le m s in S h a n g h a i f

o ra n e x te n d e dp e r io do f tim e w ith h e rtw o c h ild r e n . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 20 8. 13 (b)( 2)(i i ); G om es v. G on zales , 4 2 9 F .3 d1 2 6 4 , 1 2 6 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , L in ’s a s y lu m c la im f a ils . B e c au s e L in d idn o t e s tab lis h e lig ib ilityf o ra s y lu m , it f

o llo w s th a t s h e d id n o t s a tis f yth e m o r e s tr in g e n t s tan d ar df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the B I A ’ s c onc l us i on tha tL i n i s not e lig ib le f o rC A T r e lie f

b e c au s e s h e f

a ile dto s h o w th a t it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t07- 73177 3 th a t s h e w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif r e m o v e dto C h in a . See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1067- 68. PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .