Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Notices 54449 

(OMB) to approve a new information 

collection. The FAA would amend the 

regulations governing flight data 

recorders to increase the number of 

digital flight data recorder parameters 

for certain Boeing airplanes. 

DATES: Please submit comments by 

November 18, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carla Mauney on (202) 267–9895, or by 

e-mail at: Carla.Mauneyfaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

Title: Revisions to Digital Flight Data 

Recorder Regulations for Boeing 737 

Airplanes and for All Part 125 

Airplanes. 

Type of Request: Reinstatement, 

without change, of a previously 

approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 2120–0616. 

Form(s): There are no FAA forms 

associated with this collection. 

Affected Public: A total of 2,960 

Respondents. 

Frequency: This is a passive 

information collection. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: This is a passive information 

collection activity. Responses are 

recorded automatically in the aircraft’s 

digital flight data recorder. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 1 hour annually. 

Abstract: The FAA would amend the 

regulations governing flight data 

recorders to increase the number of 

digital flight data recorder parameters 

for certain Boeing airplanes. This 

change is based on safety 

recommendations from the National 

Transportation Safety Board following 

its investigations of two accidents and 

several incidents involving 737s. 

Addresses: Send comments to the 

FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla 

Mauney, Room 712, Federal Aviation 

Administration, IT Enterprises Business 

Services Division, AES–200, 800 

Independence Ave., SW., Washington, 

DC 20591. 

Comments are invited on: Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; the accuracy of 

the Department’s estimates of the 

burden of the proposed information 

collection; ways to enhance the quality, 

utility and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on 

September 12, 2008. 

Carla Mauney, 

FAA Information Collection Clearance 

Officer, IT Enterprises Business Services 

Division, AES–200. 

[FR Doc. E8–21812 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Public Notice for Waiver of 

Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance; 

Mansfield Lahm International Airport, 

Mansfield, OH 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with 

respect to land. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) is considering a 

proposal to change a portion of the 

airport from aeronautical use to nonaeronautical use and to authorize the 

sale of the airport property. The 

proposal consists of the sale of two areas 

adjacent to one another of vacant land 

with few trees remaining along old 

property lines and at the edge of the 

approach surface, and owned by the 

City of Mansfield. The Parcels (#47 and 

0–1) is approximately 21.571 acres. 

There are no impacts to the airport by 

allowing the airport to dispose of the 

property. The proposed land for release 

is vacant and not required for future 

airport development. The intended land 

use is for the expansion of the GormanRupp Company along Harrington 

Memorial Road. Approval does not 

constitute a commitment by the FAA to 

financially assist in the disposal of the 

subject airport property nor a 

determination of eligibility for grant-inaid funding from the FAA. The 

disposition of proceeds from the 

disposal of the airport property will be 

in accordance with FAA’s Policy and 

Procedures Concerning the Use of 

Airport Revenue, published in the 

Federal Register on February 16, 1999. 

In accordance with section 47107(h) 

of title 49, United States Code, this 

notice is required to be published in the 

Federal Register 30 days before 

modifying the land-use assurance that 

requires the property to be used for an 

aeronautical purpose. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 20, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Swann, Program Manager, 

Detroit Airports District Office, 11677 

South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, 

Michigan 48174. Telephone Number: 

(734) 229–2945/FAX Number: (734) 

229–2950. Documents reflecting this 

FAA action may be reviewed at this 

same location or at Mansfield Lahm 

International Airport, Mansfield, Ohio. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following 

is a legal description of both properties 

situated in the State of Ohio, County of 

Richland, City of Mansfield, located in 

the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, 

Township 21 North, Range 18 West, and 

described as follows: 

(Legal Description of Property). 

Parcel 0–1 

Beginning at a concrete monument 

found at the Southwest corner of said 

Northeast Quarter of Section 3, said 

being the Northeasterly corner of a 

parcel of land now owned by The 

Gorman-Rupp Company of record in 

Official Record Volume 514, Page 50; 

Thence North 01°28′00′′ West, a 

distance of 1270.74 feet along the 

westerly line of said Northeast Quarter 

of Section 3, to a concrete monument 

found on the Southerly right-of-way line 

of Airport Road South; 

Thence the following two (2) courses 

and distances along and southerly rightof-way line of Airport Road South: 

1. Thence North 89°01′07′′ East, a 

distance of 10.88 feet to an iron pin; 

2. Thence South 66°22′53′′ East, a 

distance of 29.86 feet to a point at the 

northwesterly center of the 4.586 acre 

tract (clear zone); 

Thence South 34°30′27′′ East, a 

distance of 1133.89 feet along the 

southwesterly line of said 4.586 acre 

tract to a point on a curve in the 

westerly right-of-way line of State Route 

13, at the southerly corner of said 4.586 

acre tract; 

Thence along said westerly right-ofway line of State Route 13, with a curve 

to the right, having a radius of 2850.96 

feet, a central angle of 06°29′06′′ an arc 

length of 322.68 feet, the chord to which 

bears South 16°45′09′′ West, a chord 

distance of 322.51 feet to an iron pin; 

Thence South 88°25′00′′ West, a 

distance of 555.32 feet to the Point of 

Beginning, containing 11.870 acres, 

more or less, being subject to all legal 

highways and easements of record. 

Parcel 47 

Being known as a part of the 

Northwest Quarter of Section No. 3, 

Township 21 North, Range 18 West and 

more fully described as follows: 

Commencing at a concrete monument 

found at the Southeast corner of the 

Northwest Quarter of Section No. 3, said 

concrete monument also being at the 

Southeast corner of a parcel of land now 

owned by The Gorman-Rupp Company, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
54450 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Notices 

as recorded in Official Record Volume 

517, Page 79 of the Richland County 

Deed Records; 

Thence North 01°28′00′′ West, along 

the East Line of the Northwest Quarter 

of Section No. 3 and passing thru an 

iron pin found at 323.58 feet, a total 

distance of 423.58 feet to an iron pin 

found at the Northeast corner of the 

right-of-way for Rupp Avenue, said iron 

pin also being the true place of 

beginning of the parcel herein 

described; 

Thence South 88°29′32′′ West, along 

the North right-of-way line of Rupp 

Avenue, a distance of 100.00 feet to an 

iron pin found; 

Thence South 01°28′00′′ East, along 

the right-of-way line of Rupp Avenue, a 

distance of 20.00 feet to an iron pin 

found; 

Thence South 88°29′32′′ West, along 

the North right-of-way line of Rupp 

Avenue, a distance of 848.64 feet to an 

iron pin set, said iron pin also being at 

the Southwest corner of a parcel of land 

now owned by Milark Industries, Inc., 

as recorded in Official Record Volume 

306, Page 179 of the Richard County 

Deed Records; 

Thence North 01°28′00′′ West, along 

the East line of said Milark Industries, 

Inc., lands a distance of 418.98 feet to 

an iron pin set; 

Thence North 88°29′32′′ East, a 

distance of 938.94 feet to an iron pin set, 

said iron pin also being on the East line 

of the Northwest Quarter of Section No. 

3; 

Thence South 01°28′00′′ East, along 

the East line of said Northwest Quarter, 

a distance of 399.10 feet to the true 

place of beginning, containing 9.029 

acres, but subject to all legal highways 

and easements of record. 

Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on August 

13, 2008. 

Matthew J. Thys, 

Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, 

FAA, Great Lakes Region. 

[FR Doc. E8–21806 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Environmental Impact Statement: Kern 

County, CA 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the 

California Department of Transportation 

(Caltrans), is issuing this notice to 

advise the public that an Environmental 

Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared 

for the proposed Centennial Corridor 

highway project in Kern County, 

California. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah Gassner, Senior Environmental 

Planner, Southern Sierra Environmental 

Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015 E. 

Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno, 

California 93726 or call (559) 243–8243. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA 

assigned, and Caltrans assumed, 

environmental responsibilities for this 

project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. 

Caltrans as the delegated National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

agency will prepare an EIS on a route 

adoption study to extend State Route 58 

westerly to connect to Interstate 5, in 

Kern County, California. In addition, 

this EIS would provide environmental 

compliance documentation for 

construction of the project from State 

Route 58 to Heath Road. For purposes 

of the EIS, the project, known as the 

Centennial Corridor, is being evaluated 

in three segments. Two of the segments, 

from Interstate 5 to Heath Road and 

from Heath Road to Mohawk Street 

(Westside Parkway), have been the 

subject of previous NEPA documents. 

This EIS will incorporate by reference 

the previous documents: Final Route 58 

Route Adoption Project, A Tier 1 

Environmental Impact Statement/ 

Environmental Impact Report (Tier 1 

EIS/EIR) (2002) and the Westside 

Parkway Environmental Assessment/ 

Final Environmental Impact Report (EA/ 

FEIR) (2006). This EIS will serve as a 

revalidation of the previous analysis. 

The final segment of the Centennial 

Corridor, from Mohawk Street to State 

Route 58, will be evaluated at a 

construction level of analysis and will 

address multiple alternatives. 

Alternative alignments currently being 

evaluated include options west of State 

Route 99, east of State Route 99, and 

parallel to State Route 99, as well as a 

‘‘No Build’’ alternative, a transit 

alternative, and a transportation systems 

management alternative. All of the build 

alternative alignments would connect 

State Route 58 to the east end of the 

Westside Parkway project. Caltrans will 

continue to screen the alternatives 

identified through the scoping process 

and only carry forward those 

alternatives that are considered viable 

for evaluation in the EIS. The following 

alternatives are currently under 

consideration: Alternative A proposes to 

construct a new freeway west of the 

State Route 58/99 interchange. The 

alignment would travel in a westerly 

direction for approximately one mile on 

the south side of Stockdale Highway, at 

which point it would turn in a 

northwesterly direction and span the 

Carrier Canal, Truxtun Avenue, and the 

Kern River. The proposed route would 

then connect to the Westside Parkway 

alignment between Mohawk Street and 

Coffee Road. The total length of the 

project from the existing State Route 99/ 

State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 

5 utilizing Alternative A would be 

approximately 16.31 miles. 

Alternative B proposes to construct a 

new freeway west of the State Route 58/ 

99 interchange. The alignment would 

travel in a westerly direction for 

approximately one-half mile on the 

south side of Stockdale Highway, at 

which point it would turn to the 

northwest, span the Carrier Canal, 

Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. 

Alternative B would connect to the 

Westside Parkway alignment at the 

Mohawk Street interchange. The total 

length of the project from the existing 

State Route 99/State Route 58 

interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing 

Alternative B is approximately 16.61 

miles. 

Alternative C proposes to connect 

existing State Route 58 to the Westside 

Parkway by means of routing new lanes 

adjacent and parallel to existing State 

Route 99. These additional lanes would 

run parallel to and independent of State 

Route 99. Movements between State 

Route 58, State Route 99 and the 

Westside Parkway would likely be 

facilitated by braided ramps and 

freeway-to-freeway connector ramps. 

The total length of the project from State 

Route 99 to Interstate 5 utilizing 

Alternative C is approximately 18.51 

miles. 

Alternative D proposes to construct a 

new freeway in the vicinity of Union 

Avenue (State Route 204). The roadway 

would extend north from State Route 58 

for approximately one mile, where it 

would turn to the west and run parallel 

to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe 

railroad tracks. Alternative D would 

connect to the Westside Parkway 

alignment at the new interchange at 

Mohawk Street. The total length of the 

project from State Route 58 at Union 

Avenue to Interstate 5 is approximately 

18.98 miles. 

The ‘‘No Build’’ alternative, would 

not construct any improvements. State 

Route 58—East would continue to end 

at State Route 99 where it would jog to 

the north to tie into State Route 58— 

West (Rosedale Highway). The Westside 

Parkway would be constructed as a local 

facility, but would not connect to State 

Route 58, State Route 99, or Interstate 5. 

Alternative M would evaluate Transit 

and Transportation Systems 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES