Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 16, 2008 / Notices 53443 

1Commissioner Lane dissenting with respect to 

China and Japan. Commissioner Pinkert dissenting 

with respect to Japan. 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain intermediate bulk 

containers by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of United States Patent 

Nos. 4,909,387; 5,253,777; and 

5,673,630. 73 FR 13919 (March 14, 

2008). The complaint named Shanghai 

Kingtainer Packaging Container Co., Ltd. 

of China (‘‘Kingtainer’’) and Novus 

International, Inc. of St. Louis, Missouri 

(‘‘Novus’’) as respondents. 

Novus was terminated from the 

investigation on the basis of a 

settlement. 

Schu ̈tz moved, pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.16(b), for an order 

to show cause why Kingtainer should 

not be found in default, and for a 

finding of default upon the failure to 

show cause. The ALJ ordered Kingtainer 

to show cause, no later than the close of 

business on May 16, 2008, why it 

should not be found in default for 

failure to respond to the Complaint and 

Notice of Investigation (Order No. 4). No 

response to Order No. 4 was filed, and 

Kingtainer was found in default. On 

June 21, 2007, Kingtainer filed with the 

Commission (but did not serve) a letter 

that failed to comply with the order to 

show cause or the requirements of 19 

CFR 210.13(b) (response to complaint 

and notice of investigation), and that 

did not demonstrate any intention by 

Kingtainer to participate as a respondent 

in this investigation. Having adjudged 

Kingtainer in default, the Commission 

requested briefing from interested 

parties and the public on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. 73 FR 

36356 (June 26, 2008). 

Schu ̈tz and the Commission 

investigative attorney submitted briefing 

responsive to the Commission’s request 

on July 11, 2008. Each proposed a 

limited exclusion order directed to 

Kingtainer’s accused products, and 

recommended allowing entry under 

bond of 100 percent of entered value 

during the period of Presidential review. 

The Commission found that the 

statutory requirements of section 

337(g)(1)(A)–(E) (19 U.S.C. 

1337(g)(1)(A)–(E)) were met with respect 

to the defaulting respondent. 

Accordingly, pursuant to section 

337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and 

Commission rule 210.16(c) (19 CFR 

210.16(c)), the Commission presumed 

the facts alleged in the complaint to be 

true. 

The Commission determined that the 

appropriate form of relief in this 

investigation is a limited exclusion 

order prohibiting the unlicensed entry 

of certain intermediate bulk containers 

by reason of infringement of claims 13, 

14, 16, 17, and 31 of U.S. Patent No. 

4,909,387; claims 1, 6, 12, and 15 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,253,777; and claim 1 of 

U.S. Patent No. 5,673,630; and that are 

manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, 

or imported by or on behalf of, 

respondent Kingtainer. The Commission 

further determined that the public 

interest factors enumerated in section 

337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) do not 

preclude issuance of the limited 

exclusion order. Finally, the 

Commission determined that the bond 

under the limited exclusion order 

during the Presidential review period 

shall be in the amount of 100 percent of 

the entered value of the imported 

articles. The Commission’s order was 

delivered to the President and the 

United States Trade Representative on 

the day of its issuance. 

The Commission has terminated this 

investigation. The authority for the 

Commission’s determination is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

§ 1337), and sections 210.16(c) and 

210.41 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.16(c) and 210.41). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 11, 2008. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–21579 Filed 9–15–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1014, 1016, and 

1017 (Review)] 

Polyvinyl Alcohol From China, Japan, 

and Korea 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determinations to conduct full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

duty orders on polyvinyl alcohol from 

China, Japan, and Korea. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on polyvinyl alcohol from China, 

Japan, and Korea would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the reviews will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: September 5, 

2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 5, 2008, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to 

full reviews in the subject five-year 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (72 

FR 31507, June 2, 2008) was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response with respect to Korea 

was adequate and decided to conduct a 

full review with respect to the 

antidumping duty order concerning 

polyvinyl alcohol from Korea. The 

Commission found that the respondent 

interested party group responses with 

respect to China and Japan were 

inadequate.1 However, the Commission 

determined to conduct full reviews 

concerning the antidumping duty orders 

on polyvinyl alcohol from China and 

Japan to promote administrative 

efficiency in light of its decision to 

conduct a full review with respect to the 

order concerning polyvinyl alcohol from 

Korea. A record of the Commissioners’ 

votes, the Commission’s statement on 

adequacy, and any individual 

Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the 

Secretary and at the Commission’s Web 

site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
53444 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 16, 2008 / Notices 

1 Vice Chairman Pearson dissenting with respect 

to the respondent interested party group response. 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 10, 2008. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–21537 Filed 9–15–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1013 (Review)] 

Saccharin From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct a full five-year 

review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on saccharin from China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with a full 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on saccharin from China would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule 

for the review will be established and 

announced at a later date. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

this review and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: September 5, 

2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 5, 2008, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to a 

full review in the subject five-year 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (72 

FR 31504, June 2, 2008) was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate.1 The 

Commission also found that other 

circumstances warranted conducting a 

full review. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Dated: September 10, 2008. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–21536 Filed 9–15–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs, Office for 

Victims of Crime 

[OMB Number 1121–0142] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Extension of 

a currently approved collection; Victim 

of Crime Act, Crime Victim Assistance 

Grant Program, Subgrant Award Report. 

Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of 

Justice Programs (OJP), Office for 

Victims of Crime (OVC) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until November 17, 2008. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact DeLano Foster (202) 616– 

3612, Office for Victims of Crime, Office 

of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of 

Justice, 810 7th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20531. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Victims of Crime Act, Victim Assistance 

Grant Program, Subgrant Award Report. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form number: 1121–0142. 

Office for Victims of Crime, Office of 

Justice Programs, U.S. Department of 

Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: State government. 

Other: None. The VOCA, Crime Victim 

Assistance Grant Program, Subgrant 

Award Report is a required submission 

by state grantees, within 90 days of their 

awarding a subgrant for the provision of 

crime victim services. VOCA and the 

Program Guidelines require each state 

victim assistance office to report to OVC 

on the impact of the Federal funds, to 

certify compliance with the eligibility 

requirements of VOCA, and to provide 

a summary of proposed activities. This 

information will be aggregated and serve 

as supporting documentation for the 

Director’s biennial report to the 

President and to the Congress on the 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES