alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21152]



[[Page 52979]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PH08-34-000]


IIF US Holding 1GP, LLC; Notice of Filing

September 5, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 14, 2008, IIF US Holding 1GP, LLC 
tendered for filing its FERC-65A notification of exemption on behalf of 
itself and its subsidiary holding companies.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#367073647579585a5f585365434646594442765053445518515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b7d7e697874555752555e684e4b4b54494f7b5d5e4958155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 12, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21152 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of deCODE genetics, Inc.(the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with thesecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned , Kari Stefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Registrant, and Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: August 5, 2005 | /s/ Kari Stefansson         |   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                       | Kari Stefansson             |
|                       | Chairman, President, Chief  |
|                       | Executive Officer           |
|                       |                        |
|                       |                        |
| Dated: August 5, 2005 | /s/ Lance  Thibault         |   |
|                       | Lance Thibault              |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer and |
|                       | Treasurer                   |

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Adams, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The testimony of accomplice Robert Ladd was corroborated by sufficient independent evidence tending to connect defendant with the arson at his former marital residence (CPL 60.22 [1]). Upon our independent review of the record and the circumstances surrounding the incident, we find the sentence neither harsh nor excessive and decline to modify it in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J.—arson, third degree.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

SABRINA WARD,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 

Defendants.

8:23CV212

ORDER

Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement (Filing No. 40) filed by the plaintiff as to defendant 

Equifax Information Solutions, Inc., only,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. On or before October 27, 2023, the plaintiff and defendant Equifax Information

Solutions, Inc., shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other 

dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the trial judge a draft order which will fully 

dispose of the plaintiffs’ claims against Equifax Information Solutions, Inc.: and

2. Absent compliance with this order, the plaintiff’s claims against Equifax Information

Solutions, Inc. may be dismissed without further notice.

Dated this 27

th day of September, 2023. 

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cv-00212-JFB-MDN Doc # 41 Filed: 09/27/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 133
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: October 16-17, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact: Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, National 
Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., Ste. 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5966, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#681f0401280509010446060100460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f7863664f626e66632161666721686079">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20643 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NIKHIL SEN SHARMA

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 3731

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 15, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit

Court for Citrus County

, Richard A. Howard , Judge.

Martin P. Mc D onnell, of Law Offices of

Martin P. McDonnell, Tallahassee, for

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Ortiz v. State , 227 So. 3d 682, 684 (Fla. 3 d DCA 2017);

Callaway v. State , 202 So. 3d 901, 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

PALMER

, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE , JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 5, 2009                                                                                                                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/      Eric      M.      Markell                   |
| Eric      M. Markell                                                                                                                                 |
| Executive      Vice President and                                                                                                                    |
| Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                         |
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. LUIS M IGUEL SAGRE R O -ALB A, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 11-10544

D.C . No. 2:09-c r-00466-PM P M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Philip M . Pro, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 17, 2013 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, WALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. Luis M igue l Sa gre ro-Alba a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 151-m onth se nt e nc e for c onspira c y to distributem e tha

m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), a

nd 846. Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738



# FIL ED D EC 30 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(1967), Sa g re ro-Alba ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e have provide d Sa gre ro-Alba

the opportunity to file a

pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or an s we ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

1 1 - 1 0 5 4 4 2
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 50

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 402(c)

of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 2001

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained

in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect

to the People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 1, 2001, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Keith Russell Judd

v. Civil No. 05-cv-173-JD

USA

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated July 13, 2005.

SO ORDERED.

July 26, 2005 _________________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Keith Russell Judd, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00173-JD Document 12 Filed 07/26/2005 Page 1 of 1

Judd v. USA Doc. 12

Dockets.Justia.com
### The Honorable Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 96-1315

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Joseph Anthony Petty, * * (PUBLISHED) Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 29, 1996 Filed: May 6, 1996

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Joseph Anthony Petty appeals from the district court 's order denying 1 his 18 U.S.C. § 3582( c)(2) motion to reduce the term of his imprisonment. We conclud e we lack jurisdiction, and remand the case to the distric t court. In 1991, Petty pleaded guilty to man ufacturing sixty-seven marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) an d (b)(1)(C). The district court determined that under the applicable Sente ncing Guidelines Petty was
a care er offender subject to a sentencing range of 210 to 240 month s imprisonment, and sen tenced him to 210 months imprisonment to be followed by three years of

### -2-

sup ervisedrelease. In November 1995, Petty filed a section 3582(c)(2 ) motionbased on the November 1, 1995, retroactive amendments to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c), which changed the method of measurin g marijuana for sentencing purp oses. On January 11, 1996, the district court entered its orde r denying the motion, concluding that due to his career offender status , Pettywas subject to the same sentencing range both before and after the retroactiv e amendments. On January 29, 1996, Petty filed a notice o f appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) provides in pertinent part: In a criminal case, a defendant shall file the noti ce of appeal in the district court wi thin 10 days after the entry either of the judgment or order appealed from . . . . Upon a showing of excusable neglect, the d istrict court may--before or after the time has expired, with or without motion and notice --extend the time for filing a notice of appeal for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise p rescribed by this subdivision.

We con clude that this rule applies to an appeal from the denial o f
a section 3582(c)(2) motion. See United States v. Ono , 72 F.3d 101, 102-0 3 (9th Cir. 1995); cf. United States v. Barney , 691 F.2d 855, 856 (8th Cir. 1982). As the filing of a timely notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional, see United States v. Anna , 843 F.2d 1146, 1147 (8th Cir. 1988), and as Petty's appeal was filed more than ten days but fewer that forty days after the entry of the district court's order, the question is whether t he time for filing the notice of appeal should be extende d pursuant to Rule 4(b). Accordingly, we remand the case to the distric t court for the purpose of determining whether this is a case of excusable neglect, and if so, whether Petty's time for filing a notice of appea l should be extended. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b); Ana , 843 F.2d 1147-48. In light of our remand, we dismiss Petty's pending motions as moot.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LUIS MIGUEL SAGRERO-ALBA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10544

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00466-PMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2013** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Luis Miguel Sagrero-Alba appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 151-month sentence for conspiracy to

distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(A)(viii), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

FILED

DEC 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(1967), Sagrero-Alba’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds

for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Sagrero-Alba the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro

se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 11-10544
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,093,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,778,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               417,000
<PP&E>                                     112,731,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,659,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,360,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,010,000
<BONDS>                                     36,844,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   107,842,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (37,336,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,360,000
<SALES>                                      5,352,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,449,000
<CGS>                                        2,117,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,238,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             764,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,412,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,412,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 18, 2022
No. 04-22-00359-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF J.E.J.A. , a Child From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-00362 Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal on June 16, 2022. Accordingly, the record was due June 27, 2022. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1(b), 35.1(b). The record was not filed. On July 1, 2022, we ordered the court reporter, Sachiko Nagao, to file the reporter’s record by July 7, 2022. As of this date, the court reporter has not filed the reporter’s record or a notification of late record. We order the court reporter, Sachiko Nagao, to file the reporter’s record by July 25, 2022 . If the record is not received by such date, an order may be issued directing Ms. Nagao to appear before this court in person and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Ms. Nagao by certified mail, return receipt requested. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.3(c), the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge of the 438th Judicial District Court.

It is so ORDERED on July 18, 2022. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT