alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement of Financial Condition for Princeton  Mining Company at  September 30,
2000  (unaudited)  and the Statement of Income  for the three month period ended
September 30,  2000 (unaudited)  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference
to  such financial  statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              88
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    88
<PP&E>                                           2,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       956,914
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,005,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,088
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)








</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JEFFREY EDWARDS, 

Defendant. 

8:23CR124 

ORDER 

 

The undersigned magistrate judge held a telephone status conference with the attorneys 

regarding the progression of this case. Defendant made an Oral Motion to Continue the Telephone 

Status Conference because defense counsel needs additional time to review the extensive 

discovery in this case. The Oral Motion to Continue is unopposed. Based on the comments of 

counsel on the telephone conference, the court finds Defendant’s Unopposed Oral Motion to 

Continue the Telephone Status Conference should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1) Defendant’s Unopposed Oral Motion to Continue the Telephone Status Conference 

is granted. 

2) The Telephone Status Conference with counsel to discuss the progression of this 

case is continued to April 17, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned magistrate 

judge. Counsel for the parties shall use Restricted Order [20] for conference 

connection instructions to participate in the call. 

3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and April 17, 

2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the 

requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny 

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account 

the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv). Failing to 

timely object to this order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed 

a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under 

the Speedy Trial Act. 

 Dated this 11th day of January, 2024. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00124-RFR-SMB Doc # 23 Filed: 01/11/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 45
Order entered August 18 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 00406

- CR

LEONEL MORENO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court C ause No. F0912595

- P



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

• The trial court shall first det ermine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

• If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. M oreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determin e whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.• The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the report er’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can

be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact,

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 (Dollar amounts in thousands)
 (Unaudited)
 Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31,2005(1)
    
    
    2004(1)
    
    
    2004(1)
    
    
    2003(1)
    
    
    2002(1)
    
    
    2001(1)
    
    
    2000(1)Earnings from operations
    
    $
    91,646
    
    
    $
    93,309
    
    
    $
    117,310
    
    
    $
    116,959
    
    
    $
    126,163
    
    
    $
    98,385
    
    
    $
    119,983Add:Interest expense
    
    
    137,653
    
    
    
    103,239
    
    
    
    139,916
    
    
    
    119,405
    
    
    
    116,021
    
    
    
    52,606
    
    
    
    84,377Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    229,299
    
    
    $
    196,548
    
    
    $
    257,226
    
    
    $
    236,364
    
    
    $
    242,184
    
    
    $
    150,991
    
    
    $
    204,360Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    137,653
    
    
    $
    103,239
    
    
    $
    139,916
    
    
    $
    119,405
    
    
    $
    116,021
    
    
    $
    52,606
    
    
    $
    84,377Capitalized interest
    
    
    27,344
    
    
    
    17,110
    
    
    
    23,572
    
    
    
    26,854
    
    
    
    32,377
    
    
    
    29,186
    
    
    
    37,079Total fixed charges
    
    $
    164,997
    
    
    $
    120,349
    
    
    $
    163,488
    
    
    $
    146,259
    
    
    $
    148,398
    
    
    $
    81,792
    
    
    $
    121,456Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.7
 
 (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified for all periods
presented.
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 has been made under my supervision. |
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2018-B |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AARON JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 382 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of April, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 1:05-cr-00207-SM Document 56 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 6Case 1:05-cr-00207-SM Document 56 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 6Case 1:05-cr-00207-SM Document 56 Filed 01/29/07 Page 3 of 6Case 1:05-cr-00207-SM Document 56 Filed 01/29/07 Page 4 of 6Case 1:05-cr-00207-SM Document 56 Filed 01/29/07 Page 5 of 6Case 1:05-cr-00207-SM Document 56 Filed 01/29/07 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,267
<INVENTORY>                                     10,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,555
<PP&E>                                         381,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                   (228,633)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,411
<SALES>                                         17,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,222
<CGS>                                            9,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (20,554)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,523)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,793)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.71)




</TABLE>
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 70



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CV-14-72 JENNIFER STEELE APPELLANT V. JOHN LYON APPELLEE Opinion Delivered February 11, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, TWELFTH DIVISION [NO. 60DR-13-2293] HONORABLE ALICE S. GRAY, JUDGE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge Jennifer Steele brings this appeal from the order of protection entered by the Pulaski County Circuit Court on September 10, 2013, in favor of Steele’s former boyfriend, appellee John Lyon. The issues on appeal are (1)whether the trial court erred in allowing appellee to testify or erred in admitting certain evidence during his testimony that appellant argues was not provided in discovery; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling that the case fell within the scope of the Domestic Abuse Act; (3) whether the trial court erred in allowing appellee’s Exhibit 1 into evidence; (4) whether the trial court erred in allowing appellant to read text messages into the record that she could not authenticate; and (5) whether sufficient evidence supported the trial court’s ruling in favor of appellee. We are unable to reach the merits of Steele’s arguments at this time due to deficiencies in her addendum. Because the addendumCite as 2015 Ark. App. 70

is not in compliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8), we order appellant to file a supplemental addendum. Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires the addendum to contain all documents in the record that “are essential for the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to decide the issues on appeal.” Specifically, the Rule requires “any order extending the time to file the record on appeal” to be included in the addendum. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2014). Because appellant has not included the circuit court’s order granting the extension of time to lodge the record, we direct her to correct this deficiency by filing a supplemental addendum within seven calendar days from the date of this opinion. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4- 2(b)(4). See In re 4-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court , 2011 Ark. 141. We strongly encourage appellate counsel, prior to filing the supplemental addendum, to review our rules as well as the addendum to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present. Supplemental addendum ordered. H ARRISON and G LOVER , JJ., agree. Scott A. Strain , for appellant. Robertson Law Firm , by: Bonnie Robertson , for appellee.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,578                  13,056
<SECURITIES>                                       688                   2,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,528                   2,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,490                  40,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,405                  59,971
<PP&E>                                          13,889                  12,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,227)                 (5,227)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,666                  79,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,264                  11,756
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           260                     257
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,196                  33,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,666                  79,971
<SALES>                                         24,205                  24,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,599                   7,664
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (8,906)                 (7,829)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (737)                   (757)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,871)                   (791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   (301)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,871)                   (490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                  (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

FERNANDO AGUIRRE-QUINTERO, 

Defendant. 

8:23CR106 

ORDER 

 

The court has been presented a Financial Affidavit (CJA Form 23) signed by the 

above-named defendant in support of a request for appointed counsel. After a review of 

the Financial Affidavit, I find that the above-named defendant is eligible for appointment 

of counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and Amended 

Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska is appointed to 

represent the above named defendant in this matter. In the event that the Federal 

Public Defender accepts this appointment, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith 

file an appearance in this matter. In the event the Federal Public Defender should 

decline this appointment for reason of conflict or on the basis of the Criminal Justice Act 

Plan, the Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a draft 

appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other identifying information of 

the CJA Panel attorney identified in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for 

this district. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of this order to 

the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nebraska. 

 DATED this 22nd day of May, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00106-RFR-SMB Doc # 12 Filed: 05/22/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 18
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, CDRC Conflicts.
    Date: October 20, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 
DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of 
Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#34585d425d5a5347577459555d581a5a5d5c1a535b42"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86eaeff0efe8e1f5e5c6ebe7efeaa8e8efeea8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 11, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-21879 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
Statement re Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Quaker State Corporation and Subsidiaries
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 1997
(in thousands)



<TABLE>
<S>                                                   <C>
Interest expense                                      $13,075
Interest factor of rental expense (1)                   4,567
                                                      -------

Total fixed charges                                   $17,642
                                                      =======

Income from continuing operations
  before income taxes                                 $26,509
Fixed charges                                          17,642
                                                      -------

Total earnings                                        $44,151
                                                      =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        2.5
                                                      =======
</TABLE>

(1)  Interest factor of rental expense computed based on:  (a) average interest
     factor from a sample of leases for operations representing in excess of
     50% of rentals from continuing operations, and (b) one-third factor of 
     rentals for other operations.