alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
To add missing Financial Data Schedule as Exhibit 27 to the filing.

                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


                        Washington, D.C. 20549

                      ___________________________

                               FORM 10-Q

              Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)

                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                   ________________________________

For the Quarter ended  September 30,1996 Commission File Number  1-5447 


                  PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD

    Pennsylvania                             25-6002536                
(State of Organization)            (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

                       Telephone -(304)926-1124*

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Yes   X        No      

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of the close of the period covered by this
report.

          1,510,000 shares of beneficial interest, without par value.


                      ___________________________

* Notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission
for the registrant may be sent to Robert A. Hamstead, Secretary and
Treasurer, #2 Port Amherst Drive, Charleston, WV 25306.






                              SIGNATURES
 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD



                                                                 
          01/10/97            Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
                              (Signature)
                              Chairman of the Board


                                                                 
         01/10/97             Robert A. Hamstead
                              (Signature) 
                              Secretary and Treasurer


Date: January 10, 1997
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                                     OF 1934


         The undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of EduLink,
Inc. ("EduLink"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of EduLink on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of EduLink. This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to EduLink and will be retained by EduLink and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


   Date: June 4, 2008             By: /s/ Ian Rescigno
                                      --------------------------
                                      IAN RESCIGNO
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6408
In Re: TONY OSIAS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-111-35-M, CA-98-50-V) Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Osias, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tony Osias has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court to compel the district court to expedite its consideration of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has a clear rightto the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is no other adequate remedy available. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).Osias has failed to make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief. Our review of the district court docket sheet discloses that there has been significant action in the case in the past six months, and therefore there has been no undue delay in the consideration of Osias’s § 2255 motion. Although we grant Osias’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BEDFORD
HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             216,669
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                      0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                      0
<PP&E>                                              23,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     301,320
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<PAYABLES>                                           8,402
<REPOS-SOLD>                                             0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                      0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            21,263
<OTHER-SE>                                        (926,395)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       301,320
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                   (75)
<COMMISSIONS>                                            0
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                            0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26,282
<COMPENSATION>                                      16,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (54,141)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         (54,141)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (54,141)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.00)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OUR JUNE 30,
2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      34,007,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,934,731
<PP&E>                                      22,712,776
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,414,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,085,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,277,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      131,633,499
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,653
<OTHER-SE>                                  90,908,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,085,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,446,913
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,946,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,289,587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,289,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,049,458)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.91)


</TABLE>
2009 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-13-2009

Rodriguez v. Our Lady Lourdes Med

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-5207

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Rodriguez v. Our Lady Lourdes Med" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1962.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1962
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-5207

 

RENEE RODRIGUEZ; BARBARA KING, In the Name of the United 

States Government Pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31

U.S.C. Section 3730, and Individually Pursuant to the New

Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act

Appellants

v.

OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEDICAL CENTER 

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil Action No. 06-cv-00129)

District Judge: Honorable Robert B. Kugler

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

December 1, 2008

 

Before: AMBRO, WEIS, and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed December 30, 2008)

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed December

30, 2008, be amended as follows:
2

On pages 11–12, starting at the fourth line from the bottom, replace

As such, we will uphold the District Court’s dismissal only if,

accepting “all well pleaded factual allegations as true and

draw[ing] all reasonable inferences from such allegations in

favor of the complainant,” it is clear that Rodriguez and King

cannot prove a set of facts that would entitle them to relief.

Worldcom, Inc. v. Graphnet, Inc., 343 F.3d 651, 653 (3d Cir.

2003).

with

As such, we “accept all factual allegations as true, construe the

complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and

determine whether, under any reasonable reading of the

complaint, the plaintiff may be entitled to relief.” Id. at 233

(quoting Pinker v. Roche Holdings Ltd., 292 F.3d 361, 374 n.7

(3d Cir. 2002)).

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: January 13, 2009

tmm/cc: Ross Begelman, Esq.

 Brian P. Flaherty, Esq.

 Gregory A. Lomax, Esq.

 Stuart A. Minkowitz, Esq.

 Marc M. Orlow, Esq.

 Drew A. Wixted, Esq.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 


August 19, 2019


 


James H. England


Chairman of the Board


FuelCell Energy, Inc.


3 Great Pasture Road


Danbury, CT 06810


 


Dear Mr. England:


 


This Amendment describes changes to the Engagement Letter dated
June 2, 2019 between Huron Consulting Services LLC (“Huron”) and FuelCell Energy, Inc. (“Client”). The
section of the Engagement Letter set forth below is hereby amended, effective as of August 26th, 2019, as follows:


 


Our Services


 


Paragraph B will be edited as follows: The remainder of Paragraph
B remains unchanged


 


		B.	Directing
the Company’s management team. The Executive will have authority to:



		1.	Manage and control the Company’s cash activities,
including disbursements



		2.	Execute contracts, agreements or other documents in the
ordinary course, with appropriate guidance from the board and CEO. The Executives will report directly to the CEO and board.



 


* * *


 


This Amendment constitutes the entire understanding between
Client and Huron with respect to the foregoing changes, supersedes all prior oral and written communications with respect to such
changes, and may be amended, modified or changed only in writing when signed by both parties. Except as expressly modified herein,
all other terms and conditions of the Engagement Letter and attached General Business Terms remain unchanged.


 






     


     


    

 


 


 





Please indicate your agreement to this Amendment by signing
and returning to Huron the enclosed copy of this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you.


 


 


	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 
	HURON CONSULTING SERVICES LLC	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Laura Marcero	 
	 	Managing Director	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Acknowledged and Accepted:	 
	 	 
	FUELCELL ENERGY, INC.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ James H. England	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	Chairman	 
	 	 	 
	Date:	8/19/19	 




 






    	 	Page 2
#### Charles S. MILLS and Goldie M. Mills, his Wife, and Louis Banfa and Alice Banta, his Wife, Appellants, v. Hazel M. KELLY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

Jan. 14, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Filed 5/10/16 In re Isaiah G. CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re ISAIAH G., a Person Coming Under 

the Juvenile Court Law.

2d Juv. No. B269655

(Super. Ct. No. J070312)

(Ventura County)

VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN 

SERVICES AGENCY,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MARCELLA G.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

Marcella G., the biological mother of Isaiah G., born 2014, appeals from 

the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights and selecting adoption as the 

permanent plan for Isaiah. (Welf & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)1 We appointed counsel to 

represent mother on appeal. 

On March 25, 2016, mother's counsel filed a brief in which no arguable 

issues were raised. On March 28, 2016, we notified mother that she had 30 days within 

which to submit any contentions that she wished us to consider, and that the appeal would 

be dismissed in the absence of any arguable issues. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 

 

1

 All statutory references are to the Welfare & Institutions Code unless otherwise stated.
2

835, 844-846; In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, 994.) Mother timely responded with 

a letter describing her love for Isaiah and her desire that he have a relationship with his 

siblings. Mother has four older biological children who are the subjects of a permanent 

guardianship with their paternal grandmother in Los Angeles County. Her parental rights 

to those children were terminated in December 2013. 

Although we do not doubt mother's sincerity, her letter offers no basis for 

us to reverse the juvenile court's order. Mother forfeited application of either the 

beneficial parental relationship exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) or the sibling 

relationship exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v)) because she did not appear at the 

section 366.26 hearing and her counsel did not raise these issues on her behalf. (In re 

S.B. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1287, 1293; In re John M. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 410, 419-420.) 

Our review of the record discloses no substantial evidence that either exception would 

apply in any event. (In re Bailey J. (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1308, 1315-1318.)

The judgment (order terminating parental rights) is affirmed. 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, Acting P.J.

We concur:

PERREN, J.

TANGEMAN, J.
Tari L. Cody, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Marissa Coffey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant 

and Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
Exhibit 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.



|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/Larry Bruce
Larry Bruce
Vice President Finance,
Secretary and Treasurer
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, A.F. Petrocelli, Chief Executive Officer of Prime Hospitality Corp. (the
"registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect

<PAGE>

the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 6, 2004

                                                     -----------------------
                                                     A.F. Petrocelli
                                                     Chief Executive Officer