alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand Capital
SBIC, L.P. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

      Dated: August 11, 2004

                                                  /s/ Allen F. Grum
                                                  -----------------
                                        Allen F. Grum, President of Rand Capital
                                                     Corporation
                                        (equivalent of chief executive officer
                                               of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)

      Dated: August 13, 2004

                                                  /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy
                                                  -----------------------
                                        Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer of Rand
                                                   Capital Corporation
                                        (equivalent of chief financial officer
                                               of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52947-52948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21307]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete products previously 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing people who are blind or 
severely disabled.
    Comments Must be Received On or Before: October 12, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.
    For Further Information or to Submit Comments Contact: Kimberly M. 
Zeich, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84c7c9d0c1c2e1e0d6e1e3c4c5e6ede8edf0fdcbeae1aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ac9c7decfccefeed8efedcacbe8e3e6e3fef3c5e4efa4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C 47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

Deletions

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. If approved, the action will not result in additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities.
    2. If approved, the action may result in allowing other small 
entities to furnish the products to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the products proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    The following products are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

[[Page 52948]]

Products

    NSN: 7045-01-391-0947--Tape, Electronic Data Processing.
    NSN: 7045-01-364-2466--Tape, Electronic Data Processing.
    NSN: 7045-01-354-3517--Tape, Electronic Data Processing.
    NSN: 7045-01-247-6020--CRT and Keyboard Cleaner.
    NSN: 7045-01-438-6297--Data Cartridge, Travan.
    NPA: North Central Sight Services, Inc., Williamsport, PA.
    Contracting Activity: Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, 
Philadelphia, PA.

Kimberly M. Zeich,
Director, Program Operations.
[FR Doc. E8-21307 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Paul Blackmer

v. Civil No. 05-cv-340-PB

Warden, Northern New Hampshire

Correctional Facility

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated June 7, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

June 21, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Paul Blackmer, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00340-PB Document 30 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 1
Acknowledgment of Assignment



 Exhibit 10.8.1 
  
 [Letterhead of State Street Bank and Trust Company] 
  
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSIGNMENT 
  

November 2, 2004 
  
 Phil Swan 
 Capital Guardian Trust Company 
 333 South Hope Street, 51st Floor 
 Los Angeles, CA 90071 
  

	 	Re:	Investment Advisor Agreement, dated as follows: Growth Fund, November 1, 1992, Aggressive Fund, November 1, 1992 and Balanced Fund, June 30, 1997 between State Street Bank and Trust
Company and [Investment Advisor] relating to the American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective Trust (“Trust”) 

  
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 This is to notify you that effective December 1, 2004, State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”) will be replaced as trustee of the
Trust by State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire, a New Hampshire Trust Company and wholly-owned subsidiary of State Street (“State Street Trust Company”). 
  
 In connection with the appointment of State Street Trust Company as trustee of the Trust, State Street hereby assigns its
rights under the Investment Advisor Agreement to State Street Trust Company, and State Street Trust Company agrees to assume all of such rights and all obligations under the Investment Advisor Agreement as of a effective date. 
  
 By countersigning this letter below and returning it to us, you acknowledge
and agree to such assignment and that State Street Trust Company will be deemed your counterparty for all purposes under the Investment Advisory Agreement effective as of December 1, 2004. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

							
	State Street Bank and Trust Company	 	State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire
				
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Beth Halberstadt

	 	 By:
	  	 /s/ Gary Jenkins


	 Name:
	  	 Beth Halberstadt
	 	 Name:
	  	 Gary Jenkins

	 Title:
	  	 Vice President
	 	 Title:
	  	 Director

			
	Capital Guardian Trust Company	 	 	  	 
				
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Michelle D. Casados

	 	 	  	 
	 Name:
	  	 Michelle D. Casados
	 	 	  	 
	 Title:
	  	 Assistant Vice President
#### CHENNAULT v. MORGAN.

No. 6358.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1942.

Rehearing Denied March 3, *1942.*

Warren Hunt, of Rayville, for plaintiff-appellant.

W. D. Cotton, of Rayville, and Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh, of Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

This suit is companion to No. 6357 on the docket of this court, entitled Richard Hatch v. Fred Morgan, 12 So.2d 476, in which judgment was today rendered. The two cases were consolidated for trial below and here. ■ Save as to the description of the land to which mineral rights were transferred to plaintiff by defendant, the price paid therefor and the amount of royalty received under the sale, the pleadings and issues in this case are identical with those in No. 6357.

The plaintiff died prior to trial and submission of the case below. His surviving widow and sole heir, Mrs. Elevena Chen-nault, was substituted party plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in her favor as *482prayed for, excepting the attorney’s fee. Each side appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in said case No. 6357, the judgment appealed from is now affirmed with costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

M.R. and C.B.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-292-SM

Brookline School District

ORDER

Re: Document No. 24, Motion For Additional Evidence

Ruling: Denied as to Dr. Afshar. Plaintiffs had him in

attendance at the hearing and did not call him that day nor did

they ask for another day. Denied as to Dr. Yardley. Plaintiffs

objected to that evidence at the hearing. Denied as to Lambert. 

Plaintiffs could have introduced it at the reopened hearing. 

Denied as to Drs. Blom, Willis, and Goodall - no justification

for it has been shown.

James R. Muirhead

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Date: 11/16/06

cc: Dean B. Eggert, Esq.

 Theresa Kraft, Esq.

 

 

Case 1:05-cv-00292-JL Document 51 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                     PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               For the Six
                                               Months Ended            For the Years Ended
                                                 June 30,                 December 31,
                                              ------------------------------------------------------
                                              2005    2004    2004    2003    2002    2001      2000
                                              ------------------------------------------------------
                                                           (Millions, except ratios)
<S>                                           <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations     $284    $313    $592    $376    $320    $324      $994
Fixed Charges                                  173     187     362     390     408     461       447
                                              ------------------------------------------------------
Total Earnings                                $454    $500    $954    $766    $728    $785    $1,441
                                              ======================================================

Fixed Charges as Defined in
   Regulation S-K(B)

Interest Expense                              $170    $187    $362    $390    $406    $458      $444
Interest Factor in Rentals                       -       -       -       -       2       3         3
                                              ------------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges                           $170    $187    $362    $390    $408    $461      $447
                                              ======================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            2.67    2.67    2.64    1.96    1.78    1.70      3.22
                                              ======================================================
</TABLE>


(A)  The term "earnings" shall be defined as pretax income from continuing
     operations. Add to pretax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to
     exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
     amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals.
ex_154888.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE TWO RIVER COMMUNITY BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of August 8, 2019 by and between Two River Community Bank (“TRCB” or “Employer”), a banking corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, with its principal office at 766 Shrewsbury Avenue, Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07724; and A. Richard Abrahamian (“Executive”), whose business address is 766 Shrewsbury Avenue, Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07724.


 


WHEREAS, TRCB and Executive executed a Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated January 1, 2012; and


 


WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Agreement TRCB has reserved to itself the right to amend the Agreement from time to time; and


 


WHEREAS, TRCB and the Executive executed the First Amendment to the Agreement on June 1, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS, TRCB and the Executive executed the Second Amendment to the Agreement on September 30, 2016; and


 


WHEREAS, TRCB wishes to amend the Agreement to revise certain forfeiture provisions.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Bank determines as follows:


 


Section 1.6 of the Agreement is amended and replaced as follows:


 


	
			1.6

				
			"Cause" means any of the following acts or circumstances: gross negligence or gross neglect of duties to Employer; conviction of a felony or of a gross misdemeanor involving moral turpitude in connection with the executive’s employment with Employer; or fraud, disloyalty, dishonesty or willful violation of any law or significant Employer policy committed in connection with the executive's employment and resulting in a material adverse effect on Employer.

			



 


 


Section 2.8 of the Agreement, Termination for Cause, is amended by adding a new sentence to the end of such section which reads:


 


“On and after the date a Change in Control occurs this Section 2.8 shall be null and void.”


 



 




 




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank and the Executive hereby execute this Amendment.


 


 


	
			EXECUTIVE: 


			 


			 


			/s/ A. Richard Abrahamian                              


			A. Richard Abrahamian                         

				
			TWO RIVER COMMUNITY BANK:


			 


			 


			By: /s/ William D. Moss              


			  William D. Moss, CEO
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.D., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D12-4656

[December 10, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12000441DL.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J.

A.D., a juvenile, appeals from a restitution order following the court’s 

acceptance of his plea of no contest to one count of burglary of a dwelling 

and one count of grand theft. Appellant first argues that there was not 

sufficient valuation evidence to support the trial court’s restitution order. 

We disagree, concluding that the record evidence supports the trial 

court’s valuations. Next, Appellant argues that the trial court erred in 

awarding restitution for a camera because it was not specifically listed as 

an item stolen in the grand theft count contained in Appellant’s petition 

for delinquency. Appellant is correct.

As we explained in S.S. v. State, 122 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), 

“[w]hen a defendant agrees to pay restitution as part of a plea agreement, 

the defendant’s agreement is limited to restitution arising out of the 

offense charged by the [s]tate as reflected in the information and/or by 

the factual basis for the plea.” Id. at 502 (quoting Malarkey v. State, 975 

So. 2d 538, 540−41 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). In other words, “in order for 

the court to require restitution, either the arrest affidavit or the facts 
- 2 -

admitted by the juvenile at the time of the plea must include the items 

for which the court orders restitution.” Id.

Here, there was no mention of a camera in the arrest affidavit, the 

petition for delinquency, or at the plea hearing. Accordingly, we reverse 

the restitution order as it pertains to the camera and remand for the trial 

court to recalculate the amount of restitution consistent with this 

opinion.

Affirmed in Part; Reversed in Part and Remanded.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1996    
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997   
<CASH>                                          2,001   
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,198 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,757 
<INVENTORY>                                    21,942 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              112,129       
<PP&E>                                         37,951      
<DEPRECIATION>                                 27,208    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                160,859      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          92,518    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          216 
<OTHER-SE>                                     59,730       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  160,859         
<SALES>                                       219,250          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              219,250          
<CGS>                                         180,915          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 206,889          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                386       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,736       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,364      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6,372      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,372 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .31 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .31 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11311 and #11312] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 4. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1773-DR), dated 06/28/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2008 through 07/18/2008.                     

*Effective Date:*                         08/27/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/10/2008.                     

*Eidl Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/30/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 06/28/2008 is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 09/10/2008. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-20846 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
exv10w23



 






Exhibit 10.23




Second Amendment to the Trizec Properties, Inc.

Deferred Compensation Plan




     WHEREAS, Trizec Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Trizec Properties, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended by the first amendment thereto dated May 4, 2004 (the
“Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended by the Board of
Directors of the Company (the “Board”), and the Board has approved and adopted this amendment.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company amends the Plan, effective August 3, 2004, in the following
respects:


1. Section 4.6(d) shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:





“Interest. Each Account shall be increased or decreased by the Interest credited
to such Account since the prior Determination Date as though the balance of that Account
had been invested in the applicable Valuation Funds chosen by the Participant.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the
Company, this 3rd day of August, 2004.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TRIZEC PROPERTIES, INC.

 	 
	 	/s/ Ted R. Jadwin
 	 
	 	Name:  	Ted R. Jadwin 	 
	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary