Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Notices 6931 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–807] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film Sheet 

and Strip from the Republic of Korea: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 6, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Heaney or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 2, 2007, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the preliminary results of the changed 

circumstances review in the 

antidumping duty order of polyethylene 

terephthalate film sheet and strip from 

the Republic of Korea. See Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film Sheet and Strip 

from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 

Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review and Intent to Reinstate Kolon 

Industries, Inc. in the Antidumping 

Duty Order, (Preliminary Results) 72 FR 

56048 (October 2, 2007). The current 

deadline for the final results of this 

review is January 30, 2008. 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

In our Preliminary Results, we 

indicated we would issue the final 

results of this changed circumstances 

review within 120 days after the date on 

which the preliminary results were 

published. However, it is not practicable 

to complete the review within this time 

period. Accordingly, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.302(b), we are extending the time 

limit by 60 days. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete this review 

within the original time frame. In order 

to evaluate fairly the issues raised by 

Petitioners (DuPont Teijin Films, 

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC 

Inc., and Toray Plastics (America) Inc.) 

and Kolon Industries, Inc., in their 

respective case and rebuttal briefs, we 

are extending the time frame for 

completion of this review. These issues 

include the appropriate model matching 

procedures to employ in this changed 

circumstances review, and whether the 

Department should employ 

investigation or administrative review 

methodologies in calculating dumping 

margins. Consequently, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.302(b), the Department 

is extending the time period for issuing 

the final results of review by 60 days. 

Therefore, the final results will be due 

no later than March 30, 2008. As March 

30, 2008 falls on a Sunday, our final 

results will be issued no later than 

Monday March 31, 2008. This notice is 

published in accordance with section 

771(i) of the Tariff Act, as amended. 

Dated: January 30, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–2179 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–832] 

Pure Magnesium from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

for the Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 6, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hua 

Lu, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6478. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 1, 2007, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice for an opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from the People’s Republic 

of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 72 

FR 23796 (May 1, 2007). As a result of 

a request for a review and a one year 

deferral filed by Tianjin Magnesium 

International Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) on May 

30, 2007, and a request for a review filed 

by Shanxi Datuhe Coke & Chemicals 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Datuhe’’) on May 31, 2007, 

the Department published in the 

Federal Register a notice of initiation of 

an administrative review (i.e., Datuhe) 

and deferral of initiation of 

administration review with respect to 

TMI for the period May 1, 2006, through 

April 30, 2007. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Request for 

Revocation in Part and Deferral of 

Administrative Review, 72 FR 35690 

(June 29, 2007). Upon learning that the 

domestic interested party did not 

receive notice of TMI’s request for a 

deferral, we extended the time period 

for the domestic interested party to 

object. The domestic interested party 

did object. Consequently, pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.213 (c), we determined not to 

defer the review for TMI. See 

memorandum to the file from Hua Lu, 

Case Analyst, through Robert Bolling, 

Granting Petitioner An Extension of 

Time to File An Objection to 

Respondent’s Deferral Request, dated 

September 26, 2007. The preliminary 

results of review are currently due no 

later than January 31, 2008. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

the Department to issue preliminary 

results within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested and the 

final results within 120 days after the 

date on which the preliminary results 

are published. However, if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the 245-day time 

period to a maximum of 365 days. We 

determine that completion of the 

preliminary results of this review within 

the 245-day period is not practicable 

because the Department requires 

additional time to analyze information 

pertaining to the respondents’ sales 

practices, factors of production, and to 

issue and review responses to 

supplemental questionnaires. 

Because it is not practicable to 

complete this review within the time 

specified under the Act, we are 

extending the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of review by 90 

days until April 30, 2008, in accordance 

with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The 

final results continue to be due 120 days 

after the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2). 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
6932 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Notices 

1We note that, on October 16, 2007, we rejected 

the petitioners’ case and rebuttal briefs because of 

the improper bracketing (i.e., claims for treatment 

as business proprietary information) of public 

information. See the September 26, 2007, 

memorandum from Elizabeth Eastwood to the file 

entitled, ‘‘Conversation with Counsel for Chia Far 

industrial Factory Co., Ltd., Regarding the 

Bracketing of Information Contained in the 

Petitioners’ September 10, 2007, and September 17, 

2007, Submissions in the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review on Stainless Steel Sheet and 

Strip in Coils from Taiwan.’’ The petitioners 

resubmitted properly-bracketed versions of both 

their case and rebuttal briefs on October 18, 2007. 

Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–2178 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–831] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

From Taiwan: Final Results and 

Rescission in Part of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 3, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel sheet and strip in coils (SSSSC) 

from Taiwan (72 FR 43236). This review 

covers three producers/exporters of the 

subject merchandise to the United 

States. The period of review (POR) is 

July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. We 

are rescinding the review with respect 

to nine companies because these 

companies had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

certain changes in the margin 

calculations. Therefore, the final results 

differ from the preliminary results. The 

final weighted-average dumping 

margins for the reviewed firms are listed 

below in the section entitled ‘‘Final 

Results of Review.’’

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 6, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers three producers/ 

exporters. These companies are Chia Far 

Industrial Factory Co., Ltd. (Chia Far), 

PFP Taiwan Co., Ltd. (PFP Taiwan) and 

Yieh Trading Corp. (also known as Yieh 

Corp.). 

On August 3, 2007, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on SSSSC from Taiwan. See Stainless 

Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from 

Taiwan: Preliminary Results and 

Rescission in Part of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 72 FR 43236 

(Aug. 3, 2007) (Preliminary Results). 

We invited parties to comment on our 

preliminary results of review. In 

September 2007, we received case and 

rebuttal briefs from the petitioners 1 (i.e., 

Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, United 

Auto Workers Local 3303 (formerly 

Butler Armco Independent Union), 

United Steelworkers of America, AFL–

CIO/CLC, and Zanesville Armco 

Independent Organization) and Chia 

Far, the sole respondent participating in 

this review. 

The Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

certain stainless steel sheet and strip in 

coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. The subject sheet and strip is 

a flat-rolled product in coils that is 

greater than 9.5 mm in width and less 

than 4.75 mm in thickness, and that is 

annealed or otherwise heat treated and 

pickled or otherwise descaled. The 

subject sheet and strip may also be 

further processed (e.g., cold-rolled, 

polished, aluminized, coated, etc.) 

provided that it maintains the specific 

dimensions of sheet and strip following 

such processing. 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

at subheadings: 7219.13.00.31, 

7219.13.00.51, 7219.13.00.71, 

7219.13.00.81, 7219.14.00.30, 

7219.14.00.65, 7219.14.00.90, 

7219.32.00.05, 7219.32.00.20, 

7219.32.00.25, 7219.32.00.35, 

7219.32.00.36, 7219.32.00.38, 

7219.32.00.42, 7219.32.00.44, 

7219.33.00.05, 7219.33.00.20, 

7219.33.00.25, 7219.33.00.35, 

7219.33.00.36, 7219.33.00.38, 

7219.33.00.42, 7219.33.00.44, 

7219.34.00.05, 7219.34.00.20, 

7219.34.00.25, 7219.34.00.30, 

7219.34.00.35, 7219.35.00.05, 

7219.35.00.15, 7219.35.00.30, 

7219.35.00.35, 7219.90.00.10, 

7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 

7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 

7220.12.10.00, 7220.12.50.00, 

7220.20.10.10, 7220.20.10.15, 

7220.20.10.60, 7220.20.10.80, 

7220.20.60.05, 7220.20.60.10, 

7220.20.60.15, 7220.20.60.60, 

7220.20.60.80, 7220.20.70.05, 

7220.20.70.10, 7220.20.70.15, 

7220.20.70.60, 7220.20.70.80, 

7220.20.80.00, 7220.20.90.30, 

7220.20.90.60, 7220.90.00.10, 

7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and 

7220.90.00.80. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

Department’s written description of the 

merchandise under the order is 

dispositive. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are the following: (1) Sheet and strip 

that is not annealed or otherwise heat 

treated and pickled or otherwise 

descaled, (2) sheet and strip that is cut 

to length, (3) plate (i.e., flat-rolled 

stainless steel products of a thickness of 

4.75 mm or more), (4) flat wire (i.e., 

cold-rolled sections, with a prepared 

edge, rectangular in shape, of a width of 

not more than 9.5 mm), and (5) razor 

blade steel. Razor blade steel is a flatrolled product of stainless steel, not 

further worked than cold-rolled (coldreduced), in coils, of a width of not 

more than 23 mm and a thickness of 

0.266 mm or less, containing, by weight, 

12.5 to 14.5 percent chromium, and 

certified at the time of entry to be used 

in the manufacture of razor blades. See 

Chapter 72 of the HTSUS, ‘‘Additional 

U.S. Note’’ 1(d). 

Also excluded from the scope of the 

order are certain specialty stainless steel 

products described below. Flapper valve 

steel is defined as stainless steel strip in 

coils containing, by weight, between 

0.37 and 0.43 percent carbon, between 

1.15 and 1.35 percent molybdenum, and 

between 0.20 and 0.80 percent 

manganese. This steel also contains, by 

weight, phosphorus of 0.025 percent or 

less, silicon of between 0.20 and 0.50 

percent, and sulfur of 0.020 percent or 

less. The product is manufactured by 

means of vacuum arc remelting, with 

inclusion controls for sulphide of no 

more than 0.04 percent and for oxide of 

no more than 0.05 percent. Flapper 

valve steel has a tensile strength of 

between 210 and 300 ksi, yield strength 

of between 170 and 270 ksi, plus or 

minus 8 ksi, and a hardness (Hv) of 

between 460 and 590. Flapper valve 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES