alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hypertherm, Inc.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-373-JD

American Torch Tip Company

O R D E R

On December 4, 2008, the magistrate judge held a hearing and

granted American Torch Tip Company’s motion to compel Hypertherm,

Inc. to produce witnesses for deposition. Hypertherm has filed

an objection to the magistrate judge’s ruling and has also filed

an emergency motion for an expedited hearing on its objection,

representing that the objected-to deposition is now scheduled to

be held on Wednesday, December 17, 2008.

To allow time for the court to consider Hypertherm’s

objection and ATTC’s response, the deposition scheduled for

December 17 shall be cancelled and may be rescheduled, if

allowed, after the court rules on the pending objection. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

December 15, 2008

cc: Jill C. Anderson, Esq.

Jacob K. Karon, Esq.

Steven M. Bauer, Esq.

Lucas M. Blower, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00373-JD Document 381 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Colin G. Cabral, Esq.

Seth M. Cannnon, Esq.

Joseph A. Capraro, Jr., Esq.

Christopher J. Carney, Esq.

Jeffery M. Cross, Esq.

Joseph T. Dattilo, Esq.

Ami D. Gandhi, Esq.

Maia H. Harris, Esq.

Marc H. Kallish, Esq.

Rhett R. Krulla, Esq.

Jonathan A. Lax, Esq.

Richard C. Nelson, Esq.

W. Scott O’Connell, Esq.

Jeremy P. Oczek, Esq.

Richard D. Rochford, Jr., Esq.

David W. Ruoff, Esq.

John T. Shapiro, Esq.

John M. Skeriotis, Esq.

Benjamin M. Stern, Esq.

Wayne Tang, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00373-JD Document 381 Filed 12/15/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Harvey Pratt

v. Civil No. 05-cv-367-SM

New Hampshire Department of Corrections,

Commissioner, et al.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff has once again sought preliminary injunctive

relief. This time he claims entitlement to relief because he was

transferred to the Berlin prison without adequate due process and

because he has been erroneously classified. 

Since he is not entitled to relief on either grounds as a

matter of law, a hearing is unnecessary. First, an inmate may be

transferred for any reason or no reason and is, therefore, not

entitled to a hearing. See Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 225-28

(1976). Second, inmates “have no protectable property or liberty

interest in custodial classification.” Whitley v. Hunt, 158 F.3d

882, 889 (5th Cir. 1998). The motion fails as a matter of law. 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of
2

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 3, 2007

cc: Harvey Pratt, pro se

 Andrew B. Livernois, Esq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from AmerUs Life Holdings, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,338,050
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      52,964
<MORTGAGE>                                     303,263
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    4,331
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,900,991
<CASH>                                               0
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,476
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         128,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,483,699
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,986,065
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   5,391
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           65,510
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 61,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           86,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,156
<OTHER-SE>                                     553,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,483,699
<PREMIUMS>                                      64,263
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            149,774
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              14,510
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,207
<BENEFITS>                                     126,125
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     16,767
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            46,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,017
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,497
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00107-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.G., A CHILD

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. C15-24139-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Lance Duane Gehring attempts to appeal the trial court’s order terminating 

Gehring’s parental rights to his child, K.G., nine months ago. By letter dated April 11, 

2016, the Clerk of this Court notified Gehring that his notice of appeal appeared untimely. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). In the same letter, the Clerk warned Gehring that 

we would dismiss this appeal unless, within 10 days from the date of the letter, a response 

was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Gehring responded but did not 

show grounds for continuing the appeal.
In the Interest of K.G., a Child Page 2

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.1

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the 

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP.

P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; § 

51.941(a) (West 2013). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the 

Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the 

fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees 

owed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion issued and filed May 5, 2016

CV06

 

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by the Texas 

Supreme Court, a petition for review must be filed with the Texas Supreme Court clerk within 45 days after 

either the date the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the date the last ruling on all timely motions 

for rehearing was made by the court of appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 53.7(a).
lJUt;~L ~ut::ry - ~UlCK i:)earcn rage 1 or 

?~S

UNITED STATES :Jc1i0z~p

L::~::j POSTI1L 

. .

::i(:li'"

Track/Confirm - Intranet Item Inquiry - 

Item: Date/Time Mailed: 

Destination ZIP Code: 95616

ZIP Code: 03101-9715

City: 

City: 

State: CA

Origin State: NH

Class: First 

Anticipated Delivery Date: 03/02/2006

Weight: 0 Ib(s) 6 oz(s) Postage: $1.

PO Box?: N

Special Services

RETURN RECEIPT

REGISTERED MAIL

Associated labels

RA56 8038 688U S

Amount

$1.85

$7;90

NOTICE LEFT 03/09/2006 08: DAVIS, CA 95616

Scanner

L569716

Event Date/Time location

NOTICE LEFT

ARRIVAL AT UNIT

ACCEPT OR PICKUP

03/04/2006 12:53

03/04/200605:59

02/27/2006 16:15

DAVIS, CA 95616

DAVIS, CA 95616

MANCHESTER, NH 03101

K973462

L569716

Enter Request Type and Item Number:

Quick Search Extensive Search ()

Version 1.

Inquire on multiple items

Go to the Product Tracking System Home Page

http://pts.usps.gov/pts/labelInquiry. 3/28/201

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 7-4 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robert G. Dutcher, Chief
Executive Officer of Possis Medical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.


Date: December 9, 2005       By: /s/ Robert G. Dutcher
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 ROBERT G. DUTCHER
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

JOSEPH R. SEALS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.,

Defendant.

4:23CV3079

FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER

(AMENDED)

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Joseph Seals’ unopposed motion to modify the final 

progression order, Filing No. 28, is granted. The unexpired deadlines in the final 

progression order, Filing No. 24, are amended as follows:

1) The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. The status 

conference to discuss case progression, the parties’ interest in settlement, 

and the trial and pretrial conference settings currently set for February 27, 

2024, at 9:00 a.m. by telephone is continued and will be held with the 

undersigned magistrate judge on May 14, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. by telephone. 

Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to 

participate in the conference.

2) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36 and 

45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is May 2, 2024. Motions to 

compel written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 must be filed by 

May 16, 2024. 

Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall 

not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned 

magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute. 

3) The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral 

testimony only under Rule 45, is May 2, 2024.

4:23-cv-03079-JMG-JMD Doc # 29 Filed: 01/31/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 114
4) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary 

judgment is May 31, 2024. 

5) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related 

grounds is May 31, 2024.

6) All other deadlines are unchanged. 

Dated this 31st day of January, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cv-03079-JMG-JMD Doc # 29 Filed: 01/31/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 115
Notice to Convert Series A-1 Preferred Stock into Common Stock




 Exhibit 10.114 
  

							
	i-STT Investments Pte. Ltd.	  	 	  	 	  	51 Cuppage Road
	 	  	 	  	 	  	#10-11/17
	 1st
February 2005
	  	 	  	 	  	Singapore 229469
	 	  	 	  	 	  	 (Regn No.: 199600443G)

				
	 Equinix, Inc.
	  	 	  	 	  	 
	 301 Velocity Way, 5th Floor Foster City
	  	 	  	 	  	 
	 California 94404-4803
	  	 	  	 	  	BY COURIER & BY HAND
	 United States of America
	  	 	  	 	  	(650)513 7800

  

	Attention:	Renee F. Lanam 


	    	Chief Financial Officer 

  
 Dear Sirs 
  
 NOTICE TO CONVERT SERIES A-1
PREFERRED STOCK INTO COMMON STOCK 
  
 We hereby give you notice, pursuant
to the Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock of Equinix, Inc. dated 30th December 2002 (the “Certificate of Designation”), that we are electing to convert the 4,144,216 Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock of Equinix, Inc. (the “Company”) standing in
our name on the books of the Company into 4,144,216 shares of Common Stock of the Company. 
  
 As the Preferred Share Certificate representing the said 4,144,216 Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock of Equinix, Inc. is already in the custody of the Company, no surrender of the Preferred Share Certificate is
necessary in connection with the aforementioned conversion. We hereby request and authorize the Company to cancel the Preferred Share Certificate and to issue in its place a new share certificate for 4,144,216 shares of Common Stock of the Company.
We propose that the conversion be effective as of 2nd February 2005. 
  
 We hereby request that the certificate for shares of Common Stock which are to be issued
pursuant to this conversion be issued in the name of i-STT Investments Pte Ltd, and that i-STT Investments Pte Ltd be treated for all purposes as the record holder of such shares of Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of
Designation. 
  
 Kindly issue and deliver up the certificate(s) for the 4,144,216
share of Common Stock by courier to our Counsel, Latham and Watkins LLP, at 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 (Attention: Dominic Yoong/ Ryan Hochgesang) as soon as practicable, and in any event, no later than
12th February 2005. 
  
 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ PEK SIOK LAN


	 Pek Siok Lan

	 Director

	 i-STT Investments Pte Ltd


  

	cc:	General Counsel, STT Communications Ltd 

 Brandi Galvin,
General Counsel, Equinix, Inc. 
 Dominic Yoong/Ryan Hochgesang, Latham & Watkins LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Shaun Hansen

Case No . 06-cr-43-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Hansen's motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 33) . Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2008

trial period. Defendant Hansen shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than September 27, 2007 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : February 22, 2008 at 11 :00 a .m.

Jury Selection : March 4, 2008 at 9:30 a .m.

Case 1:06-cr-00043-SM Document 34 Filed 09/19/07 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

September 19, 2007

cc : Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Andrew Levchuk, AUSA

Nicholas Marsh, AUSA

Albert C. Rees, Jr., AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Steven J/McAuliffe

Chief Judge

2

Case 1:06-cr-00043-SM Document 34 Filed 09/19/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,293,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,984,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                    99,241
<INVENTORY>                                  2,499,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,137,703
<PP&E>                                         263,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,672,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,086,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,905,015
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,672,777
<SALES>                                      5,664,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,664,924
<CGS>                                        4,085,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,917,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                758,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                   313,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   445,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James Libert, On Behalf Of Himself

And All Others Similarly Situated

v. Civil No. 05-cv-177-JM

Mark W. Blodgett, Lawrence W. Blodgett

and StockerYale, Inc.

Graziella Peano, Individually And On

Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated

v. Civil No. 05-cv-195-JD

Mark W. Blodgett, Lawrence W. Blodgett

and StockerYale, Inc.

Nickalus T. Holt, Individually And On

Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated

v. Civil No. 05-cv-202-SM

Mark W. Blodgett, Lawrence W. Blodgett

and StockerYale, Inc.

O R D E R

 I. In each of these cases a motion for consolidation, for

appointment of lead plaintiff and approval of plaintiffs’ co-lead

counsel and liaison counsel was filed by the Hilderhoff Group. 

Each of these motions was subsequently withdrawn as to the

request for appointment as lead plaintiff and lead counsel. The

Case 1:05-cv-00195-JD Document 13 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 3
2

dockets will be marked as follows: 

Document Docket # Entry

No. 6 05-cv-177-JM withdrawn request as to

lead plaintiff and lead

counsel

No. 5 05-cv-195-JD withdrawn request as to

lead plaintiff and lead

counsel

No. 6 05-cv-202-SM withdrawn request as to

lead plaintiff and lead

counsel

II. Both the Siregar Group and the Hilderhoff Group have

moved to consolidate the three cases. Defendants do not object

to consolidation. By separate order I have consolidated the

cases. Under the court’s assignment policy consolidated cases

are assigned to that judge presiding over the lowest numbered

case. In this instance they are assigned to me, that is, the

cases are consolidated into No. 05-cv-177-JM. Since I cannot

preside over the case without the consent of the parties, a

consent form is attached and counsel are ordered to notify the

clerk within twenty (20) days whether the parties consent or do 

Case 1:05-cv-00195-JD Document 13 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 3
3

not consent to my jurisdiction. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 21, 2005

cc: Douglas C. Doskocil, Esq.

 Jennifer A. Eber, Esq.

 Christine Friedman, Esq.

 Mark L. Mallory, Esq.

 William L. Chapman, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00195-JD Document 13 Filed 09/21/05 Page 3 of 3
·Fi!...ED 

U.S. OlSTI _,COL1'1 ~. 

O·c:_1 I ' ,.. ! ~ I~ .. JI 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

ZOI& OCi 11 PH 3! 21 

) 

IN THE MATTER OF REASSIGNMENT ) 

OF CIVIL CASES PURSUANT TO 28 ) 

U.S.C. § 636(c) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 73 ) 

(TRIAL BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) 

UPON CONSENT WHO IS ) 

SUCCEEDED IN OFFICE BY A NEW ) 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE) ) 

(J l ..._ \.1 &II\, .. U-- t. \ 

GENERAL ORDER 

NO. 2016-10 

When parties have consented to the trial of a civil case before a magistrate judge 

pursuant to NECivR 73.1(a) or (b), and the magistrate judge is succeeded in office by a 

new magistrate judge, each party must file either (1) a consent to trial before the new 

magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), or (2) an election for reassignment to a district 

judge. Failure to file such a consent or election within thirty days of notification of the 

assignment of the case to the new magistrate judge will result in case reassignment to a 

district judge. 

A copy of this general order will be filed in each case assigned to a magistrate 

judge pursuant to NECivR 73.1 (a) or (b) when such magistrate judge is succeeded in 

office by a new magistrate judge. 

DATED this 17th day of October, 2016. 

BY THE COURT: 

sl Laurie Smith Camp 

Chief United States District Judge 

4:23-cv-03103-JMD Doc # 27 Filed: 01/16/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 88