alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00520

- CR

Juan Manuel Rodriguez

- Olivas

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 235th District Court

o f Cooke County (CR12

- 00257 )

October 15, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is aff irmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
#### In the Matter of William H. Gould, Petitioner, v Woodrow Newton et al., Constituting the Commissioners of the Kenmore Housing Authority, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In confirming the determination of the Kenmore Housing Authority, we note particularly that the record supports the findings of the Hearing Officer that petitioner testified falsely under oath in contriving a story to explain why he sent the BOCES student to paint petitioner’s apartment and that he instructed the young man to falsify records to conceal what he had done. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit 10.36



 Exhibit 10.36 
  
 Schedule 
 Setting Forth Information on 
 Twenty Additional and Substantially Identical Indemnity and Guaranty Agreements 
  
 (Except as set forth below, documents are substantially identical to the

 document included as Exhibit 10.35 of this filing, except for immaterial variations) 
  

						
	 Location

	  	 Principal Sum
 (Recitals)

	  	 Pool Number
 (Heading)


	 Greensboro, North Carolina
	  	$	4,875,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Lubbock, Texas
	  	$	2,500,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Akron/Copley Ohio
	  	$	5,460,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Kalamazoo, Michigan
	  	$	3,938,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Clearwater/St. Petersburg, Florida
	  	$	3,540,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Boston/Danvers, Massachusetts
	  	$	4,620,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Irvine, California
	  	$	12,750,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Arcadia, California
	  	$	14,850,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Chicago-Deerfield, Illinois
	  	$	8,100,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Memphis, Tennessee
	  	$	2,535,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Birmingham, Alabama
	  	$	 5,573,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Placentia, California
	  	$	7,650,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Pensacola, Florida
	  	$	3,540,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Santa Fe, New Mexico
	  	$	8,050,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Boca Raton, Florida
	  	$	3,750,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Columbia/Spartanburg, South Carolina
	  	$	4,380,000.00	  	Pool 2

  










						
	 Philadelphia/Berwyn, Pennsylvania
	  	$	5,979,000.00	  	Pool 2
	 Las Vegas, Nevada
	  	$	20,625,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Shreveport/Bossier City, Louisiana
	  	$	4,050,000.00	  	Pool 1
	 Jackson, Mississippi
	  	$	3,360,000.00	  	Pool 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-60682

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT BURSE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:17-CR-6-1

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Burse was convicted of one count of possession of a firearm by a 

felon and sentenced to serve 100 months in prison and a three-year term of 

supervised release. The district court determined that he committed this 

offense in connection with the offense of possession of controlled substances

with intent to distribute and applied the cross-referencing provision of 

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(c)(1)(A). Now, he argues that the district court erred by 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 14, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-60682 Document: 00514513766 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/14/2018
No. 17-60682

2

applying this Guideline because the record does not show that he possessed 

the gun underlying the charge in connection with the possession of drugs with 

intent to distribute.

This court reviews the district court’s factual findings for clear error and 

its application of the guidelines de novo. United States v. Hicks, 389 F.3d 514, 

529 (5th Cir. 2004). A finding is clearly erroneous if a review of the record 

leaves a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. 

United States v. Griffin, 324 F.3d 330, 365 (5th Cir. 2003). 

Review of the record supports the district court’s application of the 

disputed Guideline, as Burse admitted to facts showing that he possessed 

controlled substances with the intent to distribute them, and the proximity of 

the firearm to the controlled substances supports a conclusion that it was used 

to facilitate the drug offense, as does the sum of cash found on the unemployed 

Burse. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),(n); United States v. Yanez-Sosa, 513 F.3d 

194, 201 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Skipper, 74 F.3d 608, 611 (5th Cir. 

1996). 

AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 17-60682 Document: 00514513766 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/14/2018
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
Address:   388 Greenwich Street
           New York, New York 10013

Form 13F File Number:              28-541

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Howard M. Darmstadter
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7392

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Howard M. Darmstadter            New York, New York       November 12, 1999
-------------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington
Trust, National Association.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)Date:

March 29, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Company's
Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       1,763,000
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                3,251,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   434,000
<INVENTORY>                                                  7,028,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             9,309,000
<PP&E>                                                         269,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              15,675,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        2,117,000
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       17,700,000
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                15,675,000
<SALES>                                                      6,215,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             6,215,000
<CGS>                                                        3,378,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                3,378,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             3,657,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             173,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (992,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (992,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (992,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.64)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION



I, David Morris, Principal Executive Officer of Blink Logic Inc. (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/David Morris
David Morris
President & Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
[No. 34374.

Department Two.

February 20, 1958.]

#### George C. Sapp, *Appellant,*v. Van Belle Lumber Company, *Respondent.**1*

*Wilmot W. Garvin*and *Donald J. Crawford,*for appellant.

*Morrison, Lake, Cael & Huppin, for respondent.*

1

Reported in 321 P. (2d) 904.

Per Curiam.

This is an action for additional compensation by a planer mill foreman, based on an alleged contract to pay him ten per cent of the profit of the business, or, in the alternative, for overtime as a working foreman under the terms and provisions of the Federal fair labor standards act.

The trial court found there had been no meeting of the minds on the terms of the alleged contract, and, hence, no contract; that the plaintiff was an executive within the purview of the Federal fair labor standards act and hence, not covered by its provisions relative to overtime; and that, if he were not such an executive, he had failed to establish there had been any overtime work.

This is not a case where the ultimate conclusions — that no contract existed, that the plaintiff was an executive, and that no overtime was established — are drawn from undisputed facts. Both causes of action were dependent upon the trial court’s accepting as verities the things testified to by the plaintiff. The trial court’s announcement at the close of the case, that it would find, if necessary, “that the plaintiff had failed to sustain the burden of showing that there had been any overtime work whatsoever,” was a clear indication that the court did not believe the plaintiff’s testimony concerning the marking of the hours worked each day on the calendars which were in evidence. No attempt was made to rehabilitate the witness after the testimony of the handwriting expert that the markings on the various calendars had been made at one time.

The trial court did not believe the plaintiff on the essential issues *897in his case, and, under such circumstances, an appeal by him to this court is futile. Certainly the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s findings.

Judgment of dismissal affirmed.

April 3, 1958. Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand Capital
Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 6, 2003

                                                       /s/ ALLEN F. GRUM
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Allen F. Grum, President
                                                    (Chief Executive Officer)

Dated: August 6, 2003


                                                    /s/ DANIEL P. PENBERTHY
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                 Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer
                                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 35.2



Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.



I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere
Credit Services, Inc., state:



A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period
from November 2, 2020 through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 25, 2018 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and
John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services,
Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | Deere Credit Services, Inc.               
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                           
|                       |     |                                           
|                       | By: | /s/ Steven N. Owenson                     
|                       |     | Steven N. Owenson                         
|                       |     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                     PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  For the Nine
                                                  Months Ended               For the Years Ended
                                                 September 30,                   December 31,
                                                 -------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2004    2003    2003    2002    2001    2000     1999
                                                 -------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  (Millions, except ratios)
<S>                                              <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>      <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations        $ 476   $ 278   $ 376   $ 320   $ 324   $  994   $1,163
Fixed Charges                                      273     293     390     408     461      447      442
                                                 -------------------------------------------------------
Total Earnings                                   $ 749   $ 571   $ 766   $ 728   $ 785   $1,441   $1,605
                                                 =======================================================

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B)

Interest Expense                                 $ 273   $ 290   $ 390   $ 406   $ 458   $  444   $  440
Interest Factor in Rentals                          --       3      --       2       3        3        2
                                                 -------------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges                              $ 273   $ 293   $ 390   $ 408   $ 461   $  447   $  442
                                                 =======================================================
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                2.74    1.95    1.96    1.78    1.70     3.22     3.63
                                                 =======================================================
</TABLE>

(A)  The term "earnings" shall be defined as pre-tax income from continuing
     operations. Add to pre-tax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to
     exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
     amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals.
| (logo) WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2018, by and among DEUTSCHEMORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor andAsset Representations Reviewer with respect to Benchmark 2018-B4 Mortgage TrustCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-B4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.             Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from July 1,2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.             To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

USCOC

v. Case No. 05-cv-327-PB

Town of Bow, et al.

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection and the response, I herewith approve

the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated January 10,

2007.

SO ORDERED.

February 26, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:05-cv-00327-PB Document 64 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 1