alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-0994V 

Filed: June 27, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

REGINA STENBERG,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner. 

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On July 24, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) caused in fact by the influenza vaccination she received on 

September 15, 2016. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 5. Petitioner further alleges she received the 

vaccination in the United States, suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than 

six months and that neither she nor any other party has received compensation for her 

 

1

 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
injury alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 1, 5-6. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On June 25, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent “believes that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined on the Vaccine 

Injury Table.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner has satisfied all legal 

prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 4-5. 

 

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's unaudited June 30, 1999 financial statements and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001022809
<NAME> BRIDGE VIEW BANCORP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      12,853,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             8,800,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,808,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      38,845,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        38,719,000
<LOANS>                                    107,276,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,210,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             189,674,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 171,163,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            330,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,035,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (854,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             189,674,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,201,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,508,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,709,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,386,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,386,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,323,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,117,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,116,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,116,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,347,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     25,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    25,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,127,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,210,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,210,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         22,000


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31,1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,762
<PP&E>                                           2,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,229
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,351
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,152
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (214)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    511
<INCOME-TAX>                                       169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the Companies) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Bertrand A. Valdman, the
Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:
August 5, 2004                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|                                                         
|/s/ Bertrand A. Valdman                                  
|                                                         
|Bertrand A. Valdman                                      
|Senior Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Travelers Investment Management Company
Address:   One Tower Square
           Hartford, Connecticut 06183

Form 13F File Number:              28-2551

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Sandip A. Bhagat
Title:     President and Chief Investment Officer
Phone:     (860) 277-9276

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Sandip A. Bhagat            Hartford, Connecticut      November 12, 1999
--------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand
Capital Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

            The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

      Dated: May 11, 2005

                                                /s/ Allen F. Grum
                                                ----------------------
                                             Allen F. Grum, President
                                            (Chief Executive Officer)

      Dated: May 11, 2005

                                               /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy
                                               ---------------------------
                                            Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer
                                              (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of StoneCo Ltd., or the “Company” for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,
or the “Report”, I, Marcelo Baldin, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2019



|/s/ Marcelo Baldin                           | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|Vice President, Finance                      | 
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7020** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. PETER ROBERT JORDAN, a/k/a Pete, a/k/a Richard Mercer , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00058

- HEH

- 1; 3:09

- cv - 00308

- HEH )

Submitted : November 2 , 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Peter Robert Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Childs Ackley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Peter Robert Jordan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the d enial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the const itutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the disposit ive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jordan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 3.1

                 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED CHARTER

                                       OF

                                 PROGROUP, INC.

                 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-20-106 of the
Tennessee Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the
following articles of amendment to its restated charter:

         1.      The name of the corporation is:

                                 ProGroup, Inc.

         2.      The text of the amendment adopted is:

                 Part I, Paragraph 1. of the Restated Charter is deleted, and
                 the following is inserted in lieu thereof:

                 The name of the corporation is

                         THE ARNOLD PALMER GOLF COMPANY

         3.      The corporation is a for-profit corporation.

         4.      The amendment was duly adopted by resolution of the
shareholders on July 15, 1996.

         5.      The amendment is to be effective when filed by the Secretary 
of State.

                 Dated: July 15, 1996.

                                        PROGROUP, INC.


                                        By: /s/ George H. Nichols
                                           -----------------------------
                                           George H. Nichols 
                                           President and
                                           Chief Operating Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 03, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 03, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0045. PREMIUM FUNDING SOLUTIONS, LLC v. METRO ATLANTA TASK FORCE FOR THE HOMELESS, INC..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2014CV250014
|   | 1. | to                the best of our knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements                of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | to                the best of our knowledge, the information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:              May 19, 2008   | /s/                  Burton Katz       |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                              | Burton                Katz             |
|                              | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                              |                                   |
| Date:                May 19, 2008 | /s/                  Daniel Harvey     |
|                              | Daniel                Harvey           |
|                              | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
217 La. 732

#### CITY OF NATCHITOCHES v. RACHAL

No. 39839.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 29, 1950.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1950.

"Gahagan & Pierson, Natchitoches, for defendant-appellant.

Watson & Williams, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellee.

MOISE, Justice.

The defendant, Wilson Radial, reserved several bills of exception during the course of his trial. The record shows, however, that these bills were not formally prepared and presented to the district judge for his signature and per curiam before the appeal was taken, nor does it show that time was granted for the presentation of these bills.

Our jurisprudence . is- well-settled that the mere reservation of bills of exception at the time of the court’s ruling .complained of, is not sufficient, but that formal bills should be presented and signed before appeal. Arts. 542 and 543, La.Code of Crim.Law and Proc.; State v. Carlson, 192 La. 501, 188 So. 155.

Since there are no valid bills before the Court, and since we find no errors patent on the face of this record, there is nothing for us to review. State v. Butler, 137 La. 526, 68 So. 859; State v. Snowden, 174 La. 156, 140 So. 9; State v. Owens, 210 La. 808; 28 So.2d 337.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

PER CURIAM.

In our original decree, it. was not our intention to sustain a motion to dismiss the appeal, but it was intended that the judgment of conviction and sentence appealed from be affirmed. The decree will be recast so as to read:

> “Judgment of conviction and sentence appealed from is affirmed.”
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1161

AN ACT

To authorize the Government of the Czech Republic

to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the District of Columbia.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1161

AN ACT

To authorize the Government of the Czech Republic to establish a memorial to honor Tomas G. Masaryk in the

District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1161 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Government of the Czech Re3 public is authorized to establish a memorial to honor

4 Tomas G. Masaryk on the Federal land in the District

5 of Columbia.

6 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO7 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall

8 be in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40

9 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), except that sections 2(c), 6(b), 8(b),

10 and 10(c) of that Act shall not apply with respect to the

11 memorial.

12 (c) LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—The

13 United States Government shall not pay any expense for

14 the establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

Passed the House of Representatives October 2,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.