alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

FELICIA GOSSETT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JASON'S DELI,

Defendant.

8:23CV189

FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER 

(AMENDED)

Plaintiff filed a Motion to Continue the Progression Order (Filing No. 30) in follow-up 

to an oral request to amend the progression order, namely, the deposition deadlines, in 

an April 2, 2024 telephone conference with the Court. During the telephone conference, 

Defendant indicated such request was opposed. 

As a threshold matter, the Court notes the deposition deadline set forth in the 

current Progression Order in this matter (Filing No. 13) is April 1, 2024. This deadline has 

not been extended at any party’s request since the inception of this case and only expired 

one day before the status conference with the Court and, thus, Plaintiff’s oral request to 

extend deadlines. After consideration of the standard set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 

including good cause, Plaintiff’s diligence, and potential prejudice to Defendant, the Court 

grants Plaintiff’s motion and modifies the Progression Order as follows. See Yang v. 

Robert Half Int’l, Inc., 79 F.4th 949, 960 (8th Cir. 2023), reh’g denied, No. 22-2592, 2023 

WL 6313679 (8th Cir. Sept. 28, 2023); Marmo v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., 457 F.3d 748, 

759 (8th Cir. 2006).

1) The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A status 

conference to discuss case progression, the parties’ interest in settlement, 

and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the 

undersigned magistrate judge on May 28, 2024 at 11:30 a.m. by telephone. 

Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to 

participate in the conference.

8:23-cv-00189-JFB-JMD Doc # 31 Filed: 04/05/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 87
2) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36 and 

45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is May 30, 2024. Motions to 

compel written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 must be filed by 

June 13, 2024. 

Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall 

not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned 

magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute. 

3) The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral 

testimony only under Rule 45, is May 16, 2024.

a. The maximum number of depositions that may be taken by the 

plaintiffs as a group and the defendants as a group is 10.

b. Depositions will be limited by Rule 30(d)(1). 

4) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary 

judgment is June 14, 2024. 

5) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related 

grounds is June 14, 2024.

6) All deadlines not amended herein remain unchanged. 

Dated this 5th day of April, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cv-00189-JFB-JMD Doc # 31 Filed: 04/05/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 88
S. MISTRICT COURT
» DISTRICT OF HH.
FILED

7005 JUL 2b P 221

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Patrick E. Dullen

v. Civil No. 05-cv-139-PB

Cheshire County, et al

ORDER

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Muirhead dated June 23, 2005, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

July 2C¢ 2005 z  —
Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge

ce: Patrick E. Dullen, pro se
John Curran, Esq.
H. J. Res. 76

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–44 is further amended by striking the date specified in section

107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 15, 2001’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 15

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that our  reported  dated  April 12,  1999 on our review of interim
financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation for the period ended March 31,
1999 and  included in the  Corporation's  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter then ended is incorporated  by reference in the Prospectus  constituting
part of its Registration  Statement and Post-Effective  Amendment No. 1 and Form
S-3 (Nos. 33-44380 and 333-36415) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos.  33-26442,  33-6141,  33-26443,  33-29144,  33-19012,  2-67317,  33-34363,
33-34362, 33-62648, 333-42231 and 333-52175).

Yours very truly,

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

May 11, 1999
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand
Capital SBIC, L.P. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  Dated: November 10, 2004



                                                   /s/ Allen F. Grum
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Allen F. Grum, President of Rand Capital
                                                      Corporation
                                       (equivalent of chief executive officer of
                                               Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)

  Dated: November 10, 2004



                                               /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer of Rand
                                                 Capital Corporation
                                      (equivalent of chief financial officer of
                                              Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)
Exhibit 32.b  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Report on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.  Dated: August 14, 2006/s/Larry Bruce
Larry Bruce
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer   The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

USA

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-95-01-SM

Cushaw Barnett

O R D E R

The pending motions, documents numbered #126, #127, #128 and #129, do not present 

non-frivolous issues properly raised in this closed criminal case. Accordingly, those motions are 

necessarily denied.

SO ORDERED.

March 20, 2012 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe______________

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge

cc: Cushaw Barnett

Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Debra M. Walsh, AUSA

Case 1:05-cr-00095-SM Document 131 Filed 03/20/12 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            55,254
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           37,165
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             37,939
<EQUITIES>                                      22,064
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 118,932
<CASH>                                          11,412
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               4,016
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           9,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,947
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 56,841
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             40,600
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 13,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,856
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,947
<PREMIUMS>                                      25,382
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,444
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 908
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,165
<BENEFITS>                                      15,830
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            12,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    268
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                172
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  52,708
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 56,841
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JAMES HOWARD COBB, II AND

MARLA SCHAFFER COBB, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF

OF THEIR DECEASED MINOR SON, 

JAMES BURKE COBB, AND ON

BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR

CHILDREN, SCHAFFER LEE COBB

AND DALLAS CASON COBB

NO. 2023 CW 0128

VERSUS

ASCENSION PARISH SCHOOL

BOARD, PATRICE PUJOL, 

DUTCHTOWN HIGH SCHOOL, EDITH

WALKER, RONNIE HARPER, COACH

BENNY SAIA, COACH PATRICK

HILL AND ABC INSURANCE

COMPANY

APRIL 19, 2023

In Re: Ascension Parish School Board, applying for

supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial

Parish of Ascension, No. 106435. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WOLFE, AND GREENE, J J. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

PMC

EW

HG

District Court,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ADAM THOMAS,

Defendant.

8:23CR116

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing 

No. 22). Counsel needs additional time to confer with his client regarding the decision to 

proceed to trial or, alternatively, to attempt to resolve the matter through a negotiated 

settlement. For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Filing No. 22) is 

granted as follows:

1. The jury trial now set for June 17, 2024, is continued to August 19, 2024.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of 

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a 

result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and 

August 19, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time 

under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance 

would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, 

taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & 

(B)(iv).

Dated the 12th day of June 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.

Chief United States District Judge

8:23-cr-00116-RFR-MDN Doc # 23 Filed: 06/12/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 46
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2018-B6 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  KeyBank National Association; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association;  CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association. 

Date:March 30, 2022

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Benchmark 2018-B6 Certifications
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

 Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2018, by and among MORGAN STANLEY CAPITALI INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General MasterServicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONALCOOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer and NCB Special Servicer, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, asOperating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series, 2018-BNK14 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer duringthe period from September 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”) , and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision, and 

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General MasterServicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee--Open Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
(COMSTAC). The meeting will take place on Thursday, October 30, 2008, 
starting at 8 a.m. at the Federal Aviation Administration Headquarters 
Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, in the Bessie 
Coleman Conference Center, located on the 2nd Floor. This will be the 
forty-eighth meeting of the COMSTAC.
    The proposed agenda for the meeting will include discussions of the 
latest international commercial launch developments and their impact on 
the U.S. industry and ways that the FAA can help the industry 
internationally; a report on program activities of the FAA Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation; and COMSTAC working group reports.
    An agenda will be posted on the FAA Web site at http://ast.faa.gov. 
Meetings of the COMSTAC Working Groups (Technology and Innovation, 
Reusable Launch Vehicle, Risk Management, and Space Transportation 
Operations) will be held on Wednesday, October 29, 2008. For specific 
information concerning the times and locations of the working group 
meetings, contact the Contact Person listed below.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Brenda Parker (AST-100), Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 
331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-3674; E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9dffeff8f3f9fcb3edfceff6f8efddfbfcfcb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a08180f040e0b441a0b18010f182a0c0b0b440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, September 5, 2008.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. E8-21521 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Robert Alvin THOMAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 56663.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

Sept. 11, 1972.

Motion for Rehearing or Transfer to • Court En Bane Denied Oet. 9. 1972.

Robert J. Wynne and Harvey G. Schneider, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

HENLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R.

Robert Alvin Thomas (hereinafter mov-ant) was convicted by a jury of burglary, second degree, and sentenced to imprisonment for seven years. His appeal from that conviction was affirmed on April 13, 1970. State v. Thomas, Mo., 452 S.W.2d 160.

Movant alleged in his motion to vacate, and contends on this appeal, that he was denied federal and state constitutional rights to due process of law in the trial of the burglary case in that (1) the court erred in admitting in evidence testimony of a police officer and one of the victims of the burglary (a) that movant stated, in response to questioning, that he “ * * * knew nothing of the burglary, was not there, and could prove where he was, * * * ” and (b) that movant “ * * * refused to make any statement * * * ” ; (2) the court erred in refusing to give an instruction requested by movant “ * * * that no inference of guilt should be drawn from the fact that movant did not testify.” Movant further alleged, and contends, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial and on appeal, because counsel failed to object to the evidence mentioned in (1) (a) and (b), failed to move to strike the same, failed to ask for a mistrial, and failed to preserve those errors for review by assigning them as such in the motion for new trial; and, that counsel failed to preserve for review the failure to give the instruction mentioned at (2) above.

Movant’s evidence on the motion to vacate consisted of the transcript of the proceedings in the burglary case.

The trial court found and concluded that the admission of testimony and the failure to give an instruction were, at most, trial errors not rising to the dignity of denial of due process, and that movant had effective assistance of counsel.

*414The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.-26(b) (3); State v. Worley, Mo., 371 S.W.2d 221, 222[1]; Sallee v. State, Mo., 460 S.W.2d 554; State v. Caffey, Mo., 457 S.W.2d 657; State v. Smith, Mo., 411 S.W.2d 208; State v. Wiggins, Mo., 360 S.W.2d 716.

The judgment is affirmed.

DONNELLY, J., and SMITH, Special Judge, concur.

MORGAN, P. J., not sitting.