alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Printing Office

The Depository Library Council to the Public Printer (DLC) will meet on Monday, October 20, 2008, through Wednesday, October 22, 2008, at Doubletree Hotel Crystal City, located at Arlington, Virginia. The sessions will take place from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Monday through Wednesday. The meeting will be held at the Doubletree Hotel Crystal City, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Federal Depository Library Program. All sessions are open to the public. The sleeping rooms available at the Doubletree Hotel Crystal City will be at the Government rate of $233.00 (plus applicable state and local taxes, currently 10.25%) a night for a single or double. The Doubletree Hotel Crystal City is in compliance with the requirements of Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act and meets all Fire Safety Act regulations.

Robert C. Tapella,

Public Printer of the United States.

[FR Doc. E8-21608 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1520-01-P
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an

order denying a motion to disqualify judge, we lack jurisdiction. 

### Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.



### SA; Hardesty
J. Douglas

cc: Chief Judge, Fifth Judicial District Court Hon. Joseph T. Bonaventure, Senior Judge Cedric Alan Dial Nye County District Attorney Attorney General/Carson City Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 4/(41D1119
Exhibit 3.1


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY


     THE UNDERSIGNED,  being the Secretary of Citizens  Communications  Company,
hereby certifies that:

     FIRST: The name of the Corporation is CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY.

     SECOND:  The  original  Certificate  of  Incorporation  was filed  with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 12, 1935.

     THIRD:   Articles   FIRST  and  THIRD  of  the  Restated   Certificate   of
Incorporation are hereby amended as follows:

          (a)  Article  FIRST  is  hereby  amended  to read in its  entirety  as
     follows:

          FIRST:  The  name  of  the  corporation  is  FRONTIER   COMMUNICATIONS
     CORPORATION.

          (b)  Article  THIRD  is  hereby  amended  to read in its  entirety  as
     follows:

          THIRD:  The purpose of the  corporation is to engage in any lawful act
     or  activity  for which  corporations  may be  organized  under the General
     Corporation Law of Delaware, as from time to time amended.

     FOURTH:   The   foregoing   amendment  of  the  Restated   Certificate   of
Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted by the stockholders and the
Board  of  Directors,  respectively,  of the  Company  in  accordance  with  the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

     FIFTH:  The  capital of the  Corporation  will not be  reduced  under or by
reason of any amendment in this Certificate of Amendment hereinafter set forth.

     SIXTH:  The foregoing  amendment in this  Certificate of Amendment shall be
effective as of 12:01 a.m. on July 31, 2008.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Secretary  of the  Corporation  has caused  this
Certificate of Amendment to be issued this 23rd day of July 2008.


                                /s/ Hilary E. Glassman
                                -------------------------------------------
                                Hilary E. Glassman
                                Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
                                Secretary
#### Virginia REDDICK, Appellant, v. C. P. CLEVELAND et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division *A.*

June 11, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7360

JOSEPH LEE ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LAWRENCEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER; WARDEN

CROSS, Warden, Lawrenceville Correctional

Center,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-99-1387-AM)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Lee Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Lee Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Robinson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v.

Lawrenceville Corr. Ctr., No. CA-99-1387-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug.

21, 2000; entered Aug. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: November 13, 2006

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                                   President


























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




     Date: November 13, 2006

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert O'Brien, President, Director and Principal Financial Officer of Quad Metals Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: October 9, 2003





/s/Robert OBrien



Robert O'Brien

President and Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-66-PB

Shelly Maynard

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the July 6, 2005 trial

in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional time

to complete a residential substance abuse program and pursue a

possible non-trial disposition. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 6, 2005 to November 4, 2005. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00066-PB Document 11 Filed 06/06/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 27, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until October 17, 2005 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 6, 2005

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00066-PB Document 11 Filed 06/06/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

RICARDO N. MURO, 

Defendant.

8:23CR118

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the motion of retained counsel, William F. Eustice, to 

withdraw as counsel for the defendant, Ricardo N. Muro. (Filing No. 29). A hearing was held on 

December 12, 2023, and upon consideration, William F. Eustice’s motion to withdraw (Filing No. 29) 

was granted.

Julie B. Hansen, Federal Public Defender’s Office, 222 South 15th Street, Suite 300N, One 

Central Park Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska 68102, (402) 221-7896, is appointed to represent Ricardo N. 

Muro for the balance of these proceedings pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, 

and Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska. 

William F. Eustice shall forthwith provide Julie B. Hansen any discovery materials provided

to the defendant by the government and any such other materials obtained by William F. Eustice which 

are material to Ricardo N. Muro’s defense.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this 15th day of December, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00118-BCB-MDN Doc # 35 Filed: 12/15/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 74
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            56,175
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           37,490
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             37,927
<EQUITIES>                                      19,186
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 118,617
<CASH>                                           7,791
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,752
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           8,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,296
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 47,586
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             38,546
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  3,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,595
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,296
<PREMIUMS>                                      17,729
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,504
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 807
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     599
<BENEFITS>                                       9,540
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             8,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                       875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  48,719
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 47,586
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
exv10w29



 






EXHIBIT 10.29




Director Compensation




      During the fourth quarter of 2004 and January of 2005, the Board of Directors of Midwest Banc
Holdings, Inc. or its subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, established directors fees for
2005 for non-officer directors as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.	 	Midwest Bank and Trust Company
	Board Meetings:

	 	$1,000 per meeting attended
	 	$1,000 per meeting attended
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Committee Meetings:

	 	$750 per meeting attended for Audit

Committee members
	 	$500 per meeting attended

for Loan Committee members
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	$500 per meeting attended for

Corporate Governance Committee

members
	 	$300 per quarter for Risk

Management members
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	$500 per meeting attended for

Compensation Committee members	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	$500 per meeting attended for

Nominating Committee members	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer:

	 	$15,000 for Board
	 	$4,000 for Board
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	$18,000 for Audit Committee Chairman
<PAGE>   1



                                                                EXHIBIT 10 (a)

                             THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
                            QUAKER STATE CORPORATION
                            1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     This Third Amendment made effective as of April 14, 1998 by Quaker State
Corporation (the "Corporation").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Corporation established the Quaker State Corporation 1994
Stock Incentive Plan on May 12, 1994 (as heretofore amended, the "Plan");

     WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended in accordance with Section 11 thereof; and

     WHEREAS, the Corporation wishes to amend the Plan as herein provided;

     NOW, THEREFORE, under the powers retained by the Corporation's Board of
Directors under Section 11 of the Plan and pursuant to the authorization of the
Board of Directors granted on April 14, 1998, the Corporation hereby amends the
Plan as follows:

1.      Clause (d) of the definition of "Section 8 Event" found in Section 8(A)
        is hereby amended to insert at the end thereof the following:

     ", provided that the transaction so approved by the stockholders is 
     actually consummated."

2.      In all other respects, the provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified
        and confirmed, and shall continue in full force and effect.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has evidenced the adoption of this
Third Amendment to the Plan by the signature of its duly authorized officer.

                                     QUAKER STATE CORPORATION

                                     By: /s/ Paul E. Konney
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Paul E. Konney
                                       Title:   Senior Vice President, General
                                                Counsel and Secretary

Attest:

By: /s/ Carrie L. Sherwood
   ---------------------------------
Name: Carrie L. Sherwood
Title:  Assistant Secretary


                                       14
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Fortress Energy LLC (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Wesley R. Edens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge: 
|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | March 26, 2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Wesley R. Edens           |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |           |   |   | Wesley R. Edens               |
|   |           |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |           |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-113-01-SM

Joanne S. Rousseau

O R D E R

Defendant Rousseau’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 25). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2006

trial period. Defendant Rousseau shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than December 28, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, her continuance

shall be effective. No further continuances absent exceptional circumstances.

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: February 23, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: March 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00113-SM Document 27 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 19, 2005

cc: Joseph Caulfield, Esq.

Robert J. Veiga, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00113-SM Document 27 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,729,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,832,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (238,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,323,000
<PP&E>                                     276,640,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,716,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             338,559,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,278,000
<BONDS>                                    179,001,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,689,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,270,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               338,559,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           104,689,000
<CGS>                                       24,283,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,696,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,513,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   197,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>