alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0001022916
<NAME> KEYSPAN ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,394,160
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    545,454
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         523,686
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       154,261
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,617,561
<COMMON>                                        17,005
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      563,553
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            433,545
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,014,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           760,111
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        6,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  34,300
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 803,047
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,617,561
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      451,947
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            27,348
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     363,712
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     391,060
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         60,887
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               7,306
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  68,193
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,646
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,547
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   56,547
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,176
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,282
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           1,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers

v. Civil No. 05-cv-222-JD

New Hampshire State Prison,

Medical Department

O R D E R

 Plaintiff has instituted fifteen (15) cases in this court

over the last four years. One was settled, one was voluntarily

non-suited, two are pending and eleven were dismissed, including

some for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. He has had

numerous preliminary injunction hearings. On July 20, 2005,

plaintiff filed the instant suit alleging that his prescribed

pain medication was wrongfully not renewed on June 4th and 10th. 

It is not clear that plaintiff has exhausted his administrative

remedies. If he has not exhausted his claim must be and will be

dismissed. 

The Clerk, pursuant to Judge DiClerico’s referral, should

schedule the preliminary injunction hearing for the week of

August 8th. Plaintiff will be required to demonstrate exhaustion

at the outset of the hearing. If administrative remedies have 

Case 1:05-cv-00222-JD Document 8 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 2
2

not been exhausted the hearing will be terminated and I will

recommend dismissal. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 2, 2005

cc: Randolph L. Chambers, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00222-JD Document 8 Filed 08/02/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


DESCRIPTION OF COMMON
SHARES


 


The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common
Shares, without par value, of which 111,962,845 are issued and outstanding as at the date of this Annual Report.


 


Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to
attend any meetings of shareholders of the Company and at any meetings of shareholders to cast one vote for each Common Share held.
Holders of Common Shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and accordingly, holders
of a majority of the Common Shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors standing for election.
Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the board of directors of the Company at its
discretion from fund legally available therefor and to receive a pro rata share of the assets of the Company available for distribution
to the shareholders in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company after payment of debts and other
liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to any other series or class
of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro-rata basis with the holders of Common Shares with respect to dividends or liquidation.
There are no pre-emptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights attached to the Common Shares nor do they contain any sinking
or purchase fund provisions.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

MARVEL JONES,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MADISON COUNTY, A Political Subdivision; 

STATE OF NEBRASKA, NEBRASKA 

STATE PATROL, A State Agency; MADISON 

COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, The 

Chief Law Inforcement Officer of Madison 

County; SIX UNKNOWN SHERIFF 

OFFICERS OF MADISON COUNTY, 

NEBRASKA, Sued In Their Individually And In 

Their Official Capacity; MICHAEL 

GETTMANN, LICSW/LIMHP, Sued In His 

Individually And In His Official Capacity; and 

SEN. ROBERT ROSE, of Law Enforcement and 

Public Safety for the Nebraska State Patrol Sued 

In His Individually And In His Official 

Capacity;

Defendants.

8:23CV182

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. 

(Filing No. 2.) The motion will be denied. 

“There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases.” Phillips 

v. Jasper Cty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006). Trial courts have “broad discretion to 

decide whether both the [litigant] and the court will benefit from the appointment of counsel.”

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 15 Filed: 09/12/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 115
2

Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996). The Court finds appointment of counsel is not 

warranted at this point. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Filing No. 2) is 

denied. 

Dated this 12th day of September, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Susan M. Bazis

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 15 Filed: 09/12/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 116
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

ELECTRONIC SOUND, INC., a Nebraska 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ZATA ELECTRIC, LLC,

Defendant.

8:23CV199

ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT THE 

RECORD

This case is before the Court on plaintiff Electronic Sound’s September 29, 2023, Motion 

for Default Judgment against defendant Zata Electric, LLC. Filing 20. The Court has reviewed the 

submissions by Electronic Sound in support of its Motion as well as the Complaint in this case and 

finds no legal basis for the 12% per annum pre- and post-judgment interest claimed as purportedly 

provided by law on the sums due under a contract that is not part of the record. See Filing 20 at 2; 

Filing 20-1 at 1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) provides in pertinent part that “[t]he 

court may conduct hearings or make referrals—preserving any federal statutory right to a jury 

trial—when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to . . . determine the amount of damages [or] 

establish the truth of any allegation by evidence . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Because the Court 

“may” conduct such a hearing, the Court believes that it may also obtain the necessary evidence 

by filing of appropriate affidavits and exhibits. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Electronic Sound shall have seven (7) days from the date 

of this Order within which to file evidence and a supporting affidavit demonstrating that it is 

entitled to 12% pre- and post-judgment interest as a matter of law. 

8:23-cv-00199-BCB-CRZ Doc # 22 Filed: 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 44
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff Electronic Sound fails to make the required 

submission within the time provided, the Motion for Default Judgment will be denied without 

further notice.

Dated this 13th day of October, 2023.

BY THE COURT:  

_________________________

Brian C. Buescher 

United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00199-BCB-CRZ Doc # 22 Filed: 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 45
Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Donovan C. Augustin, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Positive Physicians Holdings, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: May 19, 2020

 

|        |                                                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/ Donovan C. Augustin        |
|   |      Donovan C. Augustin                 |
|   |      Chief Financial Officer             |
|   |                                                              |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Isaac Kier, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of MPLC,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Isaac Kier
----------------------
Isaac Kier
President, Secretary
Treasurer and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 84 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 259
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 84

                          [Report No. 107-437]

Disapproving the action taken by the President under section 203 of the 
    Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2002

  Mr. Jefferson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

                              May 7, 2002

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to 
the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered 
                             to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the action taken by the President under section 203 of the 
    Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
approve the action taken by, or the determination of, the President 
under section 203 of the Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress 
on March 5, 2002.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 259

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 84

                          [Report No. 107-437]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the action taken by the President under section 203 of the 
    Trade Act of 1974 transmitted to the Congress on March 5, 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 7, 2002

 Reported adversely, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
           the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
Second Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.78 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT OF 
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT 
  
 This Second
Amendment of Restricted Stock Award Agreement is between Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. (“Path 1”) and John Zavoli (“Zavoli”) as of March 8, 2005. It amends the Restricted Stock Award Agreement between the parties dated October
23, 2003, as previously amended (the “Stock Agreement”). 
  
 1. The first two sentences of Section 3(b) of the Stock Agreement are amended to read in full as follows: 
  
 51,458 of the shares of Restricted Stock will vest based on the Participant’s continuous employment with the Company through July 31, 2005. 5,417 of
the shares of Restricted Stock will vest based on the Participant’s continuous employment with the Company through September 30, 2005, and 8,125 of the shares of Restricted Stock will vest based on the Participant’s continuous employment
with the Company through January 1, 2006. 
  
 2. Except as
expressly amended by this Amendment, the Stock Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect. 
  
 3. The parties acknowledge that they have the right to have been represented by legal counsel of their own choosing, and that Heller Ehrman White &
McAuliffe LLP and Hayden Trubitt are representing Path 1 and are not representing Zavoli. 
  

			
	 /s/ John Zavoli


	 JOHN ZAVOLI

	
	 PATH 1 NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ John Zavoli


	 	 	 John Zavoli, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1  TERMINATION OF INDEPENDENT CONSULTING AGREEMENT   BETWEEN  DataJungle Software Inc., a Nevada corporation having an office at 1 Hines Road, Suite 202, Ottawa, Ontario, K2K 3C7 (Hereinafter, the Company) AND  The Del Mar Consulting Group, Inc., a California corporation having an office at 12220 El Camino Real, Suite 400, San Diego, CA, 92130 (Hereinafter, Del Mar)  WHEREAS:  i. The Company and Del Mar entered into an Independent Consulting Agreement dated the 14th day of August, 2006 (the Agreement); ii. Del Mar is obligated to provide certain services to the Company for the period to July 31, 2007 as specified in paragraph 2 of the Agreement; iii. Company and Del Mar desire to terminate the Agreement prior to July 31, 2007.  THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, Company and Del Mar agree as follows:  1. The Agreement will terminate effective May 31, 2007.  2. Del Mar will be entitled to a cash fee in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement until May 31, 2007.  Company acknowledges owing Del Mar cash fees of $48,000 for the eight month period from October 1, 2006 to May 31, 2007.  The cash fee will be paid to Del Mar by the Company when the Company has sufficient cash resources to do so but in no event will payment in full be made later than December 31, 2007.  3. Del Mar will not be required to provide the Company any further consulting services as specified in paragraph 2 of the Agreement after termination of   the Agreement on May 31, 2007.  4. Del Mar agrees that agreement by the Company to pay the cash fee in paragraph 2 above and receipt by Del Mar of 1,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company in accordance with paragraph 4.1 of the Agreement is full and complete compensation to Del Mar for services rendered to May 31, 2007.    5. Del Mar agrees to waive effective immediately any rights it may have pursuant to paragraphs 4.2, 4.5 and 5 of the Agreement.  6. The Company agrees to use its best efforts to assist Del Mar with removal of the restrictive legend after August 14, 2008 from the 1,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company held by Del Mar.  The obligation of the Company pursuant to this paragraph will include providing any legal opinion required by the Companys transfer agent in order to the remove the restrictive legend.   In Witness Whereof, Company and Del Mar have executed this Termination of Independent Consulting Agreement this 24th day of May, 2007  The Del Mar Consulting Group, Inc. DataJungle Software Inc.   ____________________ ____________________ Per: Per:    ____________________ Per:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GERARDO SOTO-SIGALA and 

DAISY FRANCO,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 8:23CR113

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the defendant, Gerardo Soto-Sigala’s unopposed 

Motion to Continue Trial [48]. Counsel needs additional time to negotiate a resolution

short of trial. Counsel for the co-defendant, Daisy Franco, does not object to the 

requested continuance. For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [48] is granted, as follows:

1. The jury trial, for both defendants, now set for September 5, 2023, is 

continued to October 16, 2023.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests 

of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising 

as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date 

and October 16, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation 

of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a 

continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective 

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv).

DATED: August 21, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00113-RFR-MDN Doc # 49 Filed: 08/21/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 74
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Tanja Gavrilovic

v. Civil No. 05-cv-428-PB

Worldwide Language Resources, Inc., et al

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection and response filed, I herewith approve

the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated April 18, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

May 16, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Thomas J. Donovan, Esq.

Robert E. McDaniel, Esq.

Jeffrey A. Meyers, Esq.

Alexander J. Walker, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00428-PB Document 25 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                        43
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,997
<PP&E>                                           2,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,938
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,733
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (457)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                       537
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,861,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,172,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,730,151
<INVENTORY>                                    685,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,576,710
<PP&E>                                         687,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                 111,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,153,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,439,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,813,614
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           612
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,100,098)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,153,328
<SALES>                                     15,474,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,474,034
<CGS>                                        1,081,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,497,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,005,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,006,556)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>