alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53893-53894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21648]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1785-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), datedAugust 24, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 24, 2008.

    Clay, Flagler, Gulf, Highlands, Martin, Suwannee, and Taylor 
Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs, 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

[[Page 53894]]

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21648 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 67

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

the appointment of individuals to serve as Members of the House of

Representatives in the event a significant number of Members are unable

to serve at any time because of a national emergency.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 2001

Mr. BAIRD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding the appointment of individuals to serve

as Members of the House of Representatives in the event

a significant number of Members are unable to serve

at any time because of a national emergency.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 67 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. If at any time 25 percent or more of

5 the members of the House of Representatives are unable

6 to carry out their duties because of death or incapacity,

7 each Governor of a State represented by a member who

8 has died or become incapacitated shall appoint an other9 wise qualified individual to take the place of the member

10 as soon as practicable (but in no event later than 7 days)

11 after the member’s death or incapacity has been certified.

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. An individual appointed to take the

13 place of a member of the House of Representatives under

14 section 1 shall serve until a member is elected to fill the

15 vacancy resulting from the death or incapacity. A member

16 shall be elected to fill the vacancy in a special election to

17 be held at any time during the 90-day period which begins

18 on the date the individual is appointed under section 1,

19 in accordance with the applicable laws regarding special

20 elections in the State involved, except that if a regularly

21 scheduled general election for the office will be held during

22 such period or 30 days thereafter, no special election shall

23 be held and the member elected in such regularly sched24 uled general election shall fill the vacancy upon election.

25 An individual appointed under section 1 may be a can-
3

•HJ 67 IH

1 didate in such a special election or in such a regularly

2 scheduled general election.

3 ‘‘SECTION 3. During the period of an individual’s ap4 pointment under section 1, the individual shall be treated

5 as a Member of the House of Representatives for purposes

6 of all laws, rules, and regulations.

7 ‘‘SECTION 4. Congress shall have the power to en8 force this article through appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

NICHOLAS HEITMAN, 

Defendant. 

4:23CR3058 

ORDER ON PETITION FOR ACTION ON 

CONDITIONS OF PRETRIAL RELEASE 

 

The defendant appeared before the Court on June 11, 2024 regarding Petition for Action on 

Conditions of Pretrial Release [44]. Jonathan Braaten represented the defendant. Daniel Packard 

represented the government. The defendant was advised of the alleged violation(s) of pretrial release, 

the possible sanctions for violation of a release condition, and the right to a hearing in accordance with 

the Bail Reform Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3148. 

The defendant denied violating release condition(s). The Court took judicial notice of the 

petition and violation report. Both parties were given an opportunity to present evidence and make 

argument. After consideration of the parties’ evidence and arguments, the Court does not find there 

is probable cause that a crime was committed or clear and convincing evidence that a condition was 

violated. Therefore, the Court finds the defendant has not violated the Order Setting Conditions of 

Release [24]. The defendant shall be released on the current terms and conditions of supervision. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated this 11th day of June, 2024. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca 

United States Magistrate Judge 

4:23-cr-03058-JMG-JMD Doc # 52 Filed: 06/11/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 94
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00017

- CR
Johnny Mack Durham Jr. v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18

- 07

- 30890

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consi dered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 29 , 2020
Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.22 
  
 Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements 
  
 On February 3, 2005, the compensation committee approved the following base
salaries for the named executive officers effective February 27, 2005: 
  

				
	 Named Executive Officer

	  	Base Salary


	 Michael J. Parsons
	  	$	517,578
	 Burke W. Whitman
	  	$	498,759
	 Daniel J. Moen
	  	$	480,800
	 Donald P. Fay
	  	$	381,138

  
 In addition, on
February 3, 2005, Triad granted nonqualified stock options to the following named executive officers under the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan: 
  

						
	 Named Executive Officer

	  	Number of Shares

	  	Exercise Price


	 Michael J. Parsons
	  	70,000	  	$	42.51
	 Burke W. Whitman
	  	70,000	  	$	42.51
	 Daniel J. Moen
	  	70,000	  	$	42.51
	 Donald P. Fay
	  	70,000	  	$	42.51

  
 One-fourth of the
grant will vest as of February 3, 2006, one-fourth of the grant will vest as of February 3, 2007, one-fourth of the grant will vest as of February 3, 2008 and one-fourth will vest as of February 3, 2009. The stock options granted have a term of 10
years and become immediately exercisable upon a change in control of Triad.  
  
 The compensation committee will make its determination with respect to the salary of, and stock option grants to, James D. Shelton following completion of the Board of Directors’ Chief Executive Officer
evaluation process. 
  
 The named executive officers participate
in Triad’s Annual Incentive Plan, which pays annual cash bonuses if a specified earnings per share target for the fiscal year is met. Bonuses for corporate officers and employees will be comprised of a base bonus calculated using a
predetermined percentage of a participant’s salary and a supplemental bonus calculated using the amount by which Triad’s actual EPS exceeds the targeted EPS, which supplemental bonus will be capped when Triad’s actual EPS equals 120%
of the targeted EPS. 
  
 The named executive officers are eligible
to participate in the Savings and Investment Plan and the Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and they may elect to participate in Triad’s Management Stock Purchase Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan. 
  
 The named executive officers are also covered by Triad’s severance
policy, under which, in certain circumstances, an employee whose employment with Triad is involuntarily terminated may receive as a severance benefit up to 52 weeks of salary.
#### Lois Dean Melvin WILSON, Appellant, v. Fred E. WILSON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

Sept. 5, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53249-53250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21451]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their

[[Page 53250]]

views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to 
the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not 
later than September 29, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Leslie D. Ligon, Jr., Clinton, Louisiana; to acquire additional 
shares of Clinton Bancshares, Inc., and thereby acquire shares of 
Landmark Bank, both of Clinton, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 10, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-21451 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-113-01-SM

Joanne S. Rousseau

O R D E R

Defendant Rousseau’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 11). Trial has been rescheduled for the October 2005

trial period. Defendant Rousseau shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than August 2, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, her continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: September 26, 2005 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: October 4, 2005 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00113-SM Document 12 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

July 25, 2005

cc: Joseph Caulfield, Esq.

Robert Veiga, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00113-SM Document 12 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MR. ROBINSON, AKA Robinson, AKA 

Fnu Robinson, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 14-70673 

Agency No. A095-634-713 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Respondent’s motion to lift the stay of proceedings (Docket Entry No. 41) is 

granted.

Robinson, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-70673 

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 

597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Robinson’s second motion 

to reopen as untimely and number-barred where he filed it over five years after the 

final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where he failed to show 

prima facie eligibility for the relief he sought, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); 

Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) (explaining the BIA can 

deny a motion to reopen based on changed country conditions for failure to 

establish a prima facie case for the relief sought); Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 

1049, 1065 (9th Cir. 2009) (even under disfavored group analysis, petitioner must 

present some evidence of individualized risk).

PETITON FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 10.1

SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Seventh Amendment”) is made and entered into this 12th day of August, 2019 by and between ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION (the “Company”), a New York corporation, and DOUGLAS J. ANDREA (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, as amended (collectively with all amendments, the “Agreement”), which provides that the Agreement would terminate on July 31, 2019, unless extended under its terms; 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue to employ the Executive as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Executive wishes to accept such continued employment under the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, as further modified by this Seventh Amendment; and 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of the Agreement until January 31, 2020, subject to the terms of this Seventh Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, the Company and the Executive (individually a “Party” and together the “Parties”) agree as follows:


1. Amendment.


The term of the Agreement is hereby extended for the period beginning on August 1, 2019 and ending on January 31, 2020.


2. Ratification.


Except as modified and amended by this Seventh Amendment, the Parties hereto hereby agree and confirm that the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


3. Counterparts.


This Seventh Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.


(Signature Page Follows)












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Seventh Amendment as of August 12, 2019




	 	



   ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	By:	          /s/ Gary A. Jones                                
	 		Gary A. Jones
	 		Director
	 	 
	 	By:	          /s/ Louis Libin
	 		Louis Libin
	 		Director
	 	 
	 	By:	          /s/ Joseph J. Migliozzi
	 		Joseph J. Migliozzi
	 		Director
	 	 
	 	By:	          /s/ Jonathan D. Spaet
	 		Jonathan D. Spaet
	 		Director
	 	 	
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	/s/
   Douglas J. Andrea
	 	Douglas J. Andrea
_____________ ____________________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 18, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

137653 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. In re JADEN TAYLOR LEE, Minor. Stephen J. Markman,

_____________ ____________________________ J ustices

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 137653 COA: 283038 Mackinac CC Family Div: 00-005132-NA CHERYL LYNN LEE, Respondent-Appellant, and

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, Intervening Re spondent-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed (1) whether the term “active efforts” in 25 USC 1912(d) requires a showi ng that there have been recent rehabilitative efforts designed to prevent the breakup of that particular Indian family; and (2) whether the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of 25 USC 19 12(f) requires contemporaneous evidence that the continued custody of the Indi an child by the parent or In dian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child before parental rights may be terminated.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the March 2009 session calendar for argument and submission. Appella nt’s brief and appendix must be filed no later than January 27, 2009, and appellees’ brief and appe ndices, if appellees choose to submit appendices, must be filed no later than Febr uary 20, 2009.

The Attorney General and the American Indian Law, Ch ildren’s Law, and Family Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae by_______________________________________ __ 2

February 24, 2009. Other pers ons or groups interested in th e determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae by February 24, 2009.

1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 18, 2008

Clerk
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION

 (Dollars in Thousands)

                                                     Unaudited
                                                  Three months ended
                                                    March 31

                                                  2000           1999
 <S>                                              <C>            <C>
 Source of Cash:
     Net income                                   $213           $212

     Increase(Decrease) in accounts payable         (4)             1

        Cash provided from operations             $209           $213


 Use of Cash:

     Dividends paid                                196            196

     Increase (decrease) in cash                  $ 13            $17
</TABLE>



Notes:

     (1)  The foregoing interim financial statements are unaudited but,
          in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments
          necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations
          for the interim periods.

     (2)  Registrant has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a
          real estate investment trust. As such, the Trust is exempt
          from paying federal corporate income tax on any income that is
          distributed to shareholders. It has been Registrant's policy
          to distribute annually all of its ordinary taxable income.
          Consequently, no provision has been made for federal income
          tax.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

      ( print page 52809)    

## Notice 

Pursuant to the Food for Peace Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 480, as amended), notice is hereby given that the Draft Food for Peace Public Law 480 Title II Program Policies and Proposal Guidelines (FY 09) are being made available to interested parties for the required thirty (30) day comment period. 

                    The draft guidelines may be found at                     *http://www.usaid.gov/​our_​work/​humanitarian_​assistance/​ffp/​*. Individuals who wish to receive a hard copy of these draft guidelines should contact: Office of Food for Peace, U.S. Agency for International Development, RRB 7.06-136, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523-7600. Individuals who have questions or comments on the draft guidelines should contact both Juli Majernik (at the above address, by phone at (202) 712-4088, or by e-mail at                     *jmajernik@usaid.gov*) and copy AMEX International, Inc., at                     *ffpdocs@amexdc.com*. The thirty day comment period will begin on the date that this announcement is published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Juli Majernik, 

Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-21184 Filed 9-10-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6116-01-P