alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10wqw9



 




Exhibit 10-Q-9



[FORD LOGO]




                    ,
2005




Dear                     ,



     
[In recognition of your outstanding performance
on your 2004 objectives, in
particular                     ,
the Compensation Committee has awarded you [a 2004 performance
bonus to be paid in restricted stock equivalents (RSEs) and] an
award of restricted stock for your 2004 performance.]



     
[The performance bonus RSE award represents a
$          value,
which will be converted to RSEs based on the FMV of Ford Motor
Company Common Stock as
of                     ,
2005. These RSEs are subject to a one-year restriction period
during which time dividend equivalents will be paid. As soon as
practicable
after                     ,
2006, shares of Ford Motor Company Common Stock will be issued
to you for this grant, less shares withheld to cover any tax
liability on the value of the grant.]



     
[The performance-based restricted stock grant
represents a $ value. This restricted stock grant is
subject to a one-year restriction period, during which time
dividends will be paid.]



     
[[In addition,] the Compensation Committee has
elected to grant
you                     shares
of Ford Motor Company Common Stock. This award is for your role
in the Company’s 2004 success and aligns senior
management’s interests with our shareholders.]



     
The actual number of shares for
[the                     ]
grant[s] will be communicated to you in a separate letter the
week
of                     ,
2005. All grants will be subject to the terms and conditions of
the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40222 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RIVELINO DE JESUS YEPEZ

- ROSAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 734

- 1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rivelino de Jesus Yepez

- Rosas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Unite d States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). At the request of this court, the attorney has filed a letter advising of the efforts to inform Yepez

- Rosas of his rights under Anders in a language he can understand. United States v. Moreno

- Torres , 768 F.3d 439, 441 (5th

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 26, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40222 Document: 00512914004 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/26/2015No. 14

- 40222
Cir. 2014). In the letter , Yepez

- Rosas’s attorney states that he has communicated all relevant information to the defendant in Spanish. Yepez

Rosas h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-40222 Document: 00512914004 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/26/2015
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
July 24, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement) during
the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


First Meeting, Special Committee 213/EUROCAE: Enhanced Flight 
VisionSystems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS), EUROCAE Working 
Group 79(WG-79)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 213/EUROCAE, Enhanced Flight 
VisionSystems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS), EUROCAE Working 
Group 79 (WG 79).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a first 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 213, Standards for Air Traffic Data 
Communication Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 30-October 2, 2008 from 9 
a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Thales Avionics, Rue Toussaint 
Catros 33187 Le Haillian France (next to Bordeaux Airport).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 213 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
September 30:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Agenda Review) Review and approve SC-213/WG-79 Terms of Reference
    <bullet> General objectives of this meeting: Approve MASPS; Develop 
Advanced Vision System CONOPS, follow-on dates
    <bullet> Review and approve SC-213 Plenary Session 6 meeting 
minutes.
    <bullet> Review agenda for document approval
    <bullet> Presentations: European Airworthiness and Operating 
Criteria
    <bullet> Afternoon work session as required, with end goal of 
having a completed document to present to the committee for approval to 
proceed
    <bullet> Thales Demonstration
October 1:
    <bullet> Continuation of meeting to discuss MASPS and Advanced 
Vision System CONOPS
October 2:
    <bullet> Conclude discussion of Advanced Vision System CONOPS
    <bullet> Next meeting dates and locations
    <bullet> Feedback
    <bullet> Review of Action Items
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Other Business, Date and Place of 
Next Meeting, Meeting Evaluation, Adjourn)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 9, 2008.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee (Acting).
[FR Doc. E8-21511 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-92-01-SM

Lee Wendell

O R D E R

Defendant Wendell’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document

21). Trial has been rescheduled for the February 2006 trial period. Defendant

Wendell shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than December 28,

2005. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Change of Plea or Final Pretrial Conference: January 18, 2006 

at 2:00 p.m. 

Jury Selection: February 7, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00092-SM Document 22 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 19, 2005

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00092-SM Document 22 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
February 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned Maurice J. Hamilburg, President and Co-Chief Operating
Officer, Joseph D. Hamilburg, Chairman and Co-Chief Operating
Officer and Joseph J. Berns, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the Signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/  Maurice J. Hamilburg
President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: 07/12/04



/s/  Joseph J. Hamilburg
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: 07/12/04



/s/  Joseph J. Berns
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date: 07/12/04
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Office of the General Counsel; Appointment of Members of the 
Legal Division to the Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue 
Service

    Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal 
Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the 
Treasury by General Counsel Order No. 21 (Rev. 4), pursuant to the 
Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the 
Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service 
Panel:

1. Chairperson, Karen Gilbreath-Sowell, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Tax Policy (Department of Treasury)
2. Steve T. Miller, Commissioner (Tax Exempt and Government Entities)
3. Stephen Albrecht, Acting Deputy General Counsel (Department of 
Treasury)

    This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: August 15, 2008.
Donald L. Korb,
Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. E8-21577 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Leonard L . Kenney

V .

NH Department of Corrections,

Commissioner, et al

No . 06-fp-00 1

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-001-PB .

SO ORDERED .

Date : January 17, 2006

me R. Muirhead

ed States Magistrate Judg e

cc : Leonard L . Kenney, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00001-PB Document 5 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:04-cv-00351-PB   Document 19   Filed 03/26/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00351-PB   Document 19   Filed 03/26/06   Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2242

BARRETT L. CRAWFORD,

Trustee - Appellant,

versus

JOHN ROBERT MULLINS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CA-03-12-5-V; BK-98-50517; AP-00-5013)

Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard M. Mitchell, MITCHELL, RALLINGS, SINGER, MCGIRT & TISSUE,

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Roberts Mullins,

Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Barrett L. Crawford, the bankruptcy trustee in John

Robert Mullins’ Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, appeals from the

district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order

granting in part motions to quash subpoenas issued by Crawford to

three law firms seeking the production of documents from the law

firms related to the firms’ representation of Mullins or any

communications between Mullins and the law firms. We have reviewed

the record and lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Crawford v. Mullins, Nos. CA-03-12-5-V, BK-98-50517, AP-00-5013

(W.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:05-cr-00170-SM Document 14 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 2, 2014



/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President
(Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: May 2, 2014



/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer
(Chief Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-057-JD

Gordon Reid

O R D E R

Gordon Reid has moved on the second day of trial to exclude

the government’s footprint evidence on the ground that the

government did not disclose the examination and tests done on

footprints found near the scene of the robbery in a timely

manner. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(F) requires

the government to disclose, at the defendant’s request, “the

results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of

any scientific test or experiment” if the information is in the

government’s control, the prosecutor knows or should know the

information exists, and the information is material to the

defense or will be used by the government in its case at trial.

The local rules in this district require the government to

disclose the information and materials discoverable under Federal

Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1), without waiting for the

defendant’s demand, within fourteen days of the defendant’s

arraignment absent agreement to the contrary. LCrR 16.1(a)(1). 

Reid represents that Timothy Jackson analyzed footprint

evidence from the area of the robbery for the government on April

Case 1:05-cr-00057-SM Document 155 Filed 02/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1Although Reid refers to “Case Notes” that were to be

appended to his motion, no appendix was filed. The government

identifies Timothy A. Jackson, on its witness list, as a

criminalist with the New Hampshire State police Forensic

Laboratory.

2

20, 2005.1 Reid also represents that he did not receive

information about the footprint evidence and its analysis until

November 21, 2005, long after the fourteen-day deadline. The

government has not had the opportunity to respond to Reid’s

motion.

Reid’s motion is itself untimely. See LCrR 12.1(b). In

addition, Reid acknowledges that the footprint evidence was

disclosed to him months ago, which gave him ample opportunity to

prepare a defense to that evidence. Therefore, despite the time

limit in the local rule, the testimony of the government’s

witness pertaining to the footprint evidence will not be

excluded.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s motion in limine

pertaining to footprint testimony (document no. 151) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

February 13, 2006

cc: Gordon Reid, pro se

Helen W. Fitzgibbon, Esquire

Clyde R.W. Garrigan, Esquire

Michael J. Iacopino, Esquire

Case 1:05-cr-00057-SM Document 155 Filed 02/13/06 Page 2 of 2
*Local rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-30636

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DON TRUEBLOOD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;

THOMAS GRACE, Individually and in his

official capacity as an employee/agent of

the USA/IRS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(CV-94-2315)

_______________________________________________________

December 15, 1995

Before REAVLEY, DUHÉ AND WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Don Trueblood appeals from the district court’s dismissal of

his complaint pursuant to the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C.

§ 7421(a). He argues that the district court should have

construed his claim under the Administrative Procedure Act,

5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706; applied a judicially-created exception to
2

the Anti-Injunction Act; determined that the complaint was

subject to a statutory exemption under 26 U.S.C. § 6213; and

construed portions of his complaint as alleging civil rights

claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

essentially the reasons given by the district court. Trueblood

v. United States, No. CV-94-2315 (W.D. La. May 26, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 45

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and prohibiting

the United States Government from engaging in business in competition

with its citizens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 2001

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and

gift taxes and prohibiting the United States Government

from engaging in business in competition with its citizens.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

HJ 45 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Government of the United States

5 shall not engage in any business, professional, commercial,

6 financial, or industrial enterprise except as specified in the

7 Constitution.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. The constitution or laws of any State,

9 or the laws of the United States, shall not be subject to

10 the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement which

11 would abrogate this amendment.

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. The activities of the United States Gov13 ernment which violate the intent and purposes of this

14 amendment shall, within a period of three years from the

15 date of the ratification of this amendment, be liquidated

16 and the properties and facilities affected shall be sold.

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. Three years after the ratification of this

18 amendment the sixteenth article of amendments to the

19 Constitution of the United States shall stand repealed and

20 thereafter Congress shall not levy taxes on personal in21 comes, estates, and/or gifts.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                          26,679,000                                      
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,003,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,839,000
<PP&E>                                          72,470,000  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,717,000)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,274,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,087,000
<BONDS>                                         36,420,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       108,568,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                     (51,801,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,274,000
<SALES>                                         37,817,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,139,000
<CGS>                                            5,111,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,948,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    71,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,180,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,940,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,940,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         3.03
        

</TABLE>