alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(July 10, 1990)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Moten, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph A. Mazur, J.), rendered October 5, 1987, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) and two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16) and sentencing him to four concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Undercover narcotics officers were instructed to attempt to purchase drugs at 455 East 140th Street, apartment 1 in Bronx County, and also to execute a search warrant at those premises. After the two undercover officers were unable to gain entry to the apartment as buyers, they both separately purchased cocaine ("crack”) from defendant outside the build*73ing. Thereafter, they transmitted a description of defendant to their backup officers. Although appellant was no longer outside the building when the backup officers arrived, he was arrested in the apartment when the officers executed the search warrant.

While the prosecutor’s remarks on summation approached the limits of what is considered to be legitimate advocacy *(compare, People v Ortiz,*116 AD2d 531), they were responsive to arguments and strong comments made during defense counsel’s summation and cross-examination. Because of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, he was fairly convicted and retrial is not warranted in this instance *(People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969; *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396).

The prosecutor’s reference to the execution of the search warrant during his opening statement was not improper because, at that point, the People still sought to prove the fifth count of the indictment charging defendant with possession of drugs found in the apartment *(People v Kurtz,*51 NY2d 380, 384, *cert denied*451 US 911). The court’s summary denial of defendant’s application to controvert the predicate felony statement was proper because the abridgment of the right to appeal does not render a conviction invalid for the purpose of enhancing sentence *(People v Luciano,*46 NY2d 767).

Defendant’s other contentions have been examined and found to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00209-CR

Victor Alonso Godina, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 01-302-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Victor Alonso Godina seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for indecency with a 

child by contact. The trial court has certified, and the record confirms, that Godina waived the right of 

appeal as part of a plea bargain agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 

218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); see also Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2003). The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

 

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Patterson

Dismissed

Filed: June 19, 2003

Do Not Publish
2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R5-FHC-2008-N0234; 53330-1335-0000-J3]


Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control Alternatives Workgroup

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 
meeting of the Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control Alternatives 
Workgroup (Workgroup). The Workgroup's purpose is to provide, in an 
advisory capacity, recommendations and advice on research and 
implementation of sea lamprey control techniques alternative to 
lampricide that are technically feasible, cost effective, and 
environmentally safe. The primary objective of the meeting will be to 
discuss potential research initiatives that may enhance alternative sea 
lamprey control techniques. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Workgroup will meet on Friday, October 10, 2008, from 1 to 4 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the City of Burlington Main 
Wastewater Plant, Large Conference Room, 53 Lavalley Lane, Burlington, 
VT 05401; telephone 802-863-4501.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Tilton, Designated Federal 
Officer, Lake Champlain Sea Lamprey Control Alternatives Workgroup, 
Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife Resources Office, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 11 Lincoln Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 (U.S. 
mail); 802-872-0629 (telephone); or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3b7928596aca79a9f879c9db3958480dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85c1e4f3e0dad1ece9f1eaebc5e3f2f6abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a> (electronic 
mail).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We publish this notice under section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.). The 
Workgroup's specific responsibilities are to provide advice regarding 
the implementation of sea lamprey control methods alternative to 
lampricides, to recommend priorities for research to be conducted by 
cooperating organizations and demonstration projects to be developed 
and funded by State and Federal agencies, and to assist Federal and 
State agencies with the coordination of alternative sea lamprey control 
research to advance the state of the science in Lake Champlain and the 
Great Lakes.

    Dated: August 26, 2008.
Wendi Weber,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, 
Massachusetts 01305.
[FR Doc. E8-21440 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. J. Res. 79

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

107–44 is further amended by striking the date specified in section

107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘January 10, 2002’’; and by

striking the date specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu

thereof ‘‘January 1, 2002’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DANIELLE CLEARY,

Defendant.

8:23-CR-115

ADOPTION OF MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA OF 

GUILTY

This matter is before the Court on the magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation,

Filing 66, recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. There are no objections 

to the findings and recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and NECrimR 11.2(d), 

the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record and adopts the Findings and 

Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, Filing 66, is adopted; 

2. The defendant is found guilty. The plea is accepted. The Court finds that the plea of guilty 

is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that a factual basis exists for the plea; 

3. The Court defers acceptance of any plea agreement until it has reviewed the presentence 

report, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3); and

4. This case shall proceed to sentencing. 

Dated this 6th day of September, 2024.

BY THE COURT:  

_________________________

Brian C. Buescher 

United States District Judge

8:23-cr-00115-BCB-MDN Doc # 71 Filed: 09/06/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 179
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 15, 2019

No. 04-17-00688-CV

Jose CORRO and Concepcion Corro,

Appellants

v.

Andres PEREZ, Perez & Malik, PLLC and Adriana Medrano of Perez & Malik,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-06-23689-CV

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 8, 2019, appellant filed a “Motion to Request Appellate Record to Appeal to 

Supreme Court of Texas.” Our opinion issued in this appeal on December 19, 2018. We denied 

appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration on January 15, 2019. This court’s plenary power 

to consider any relief sought by appellant expired thirty days after we denied his motion for en 

banc reconsideration.1See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 

1

 Additionally, we note that this request is moot as appellant was provided with a printed copy of the appellate 

record pursuant to our February 26, 2018 order which granted appellant’s request for the record.
###### **Exhibit 32.1**

###### ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Covance Inc. (“Covance”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph L. Herring, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer of Covance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Covance.

 

 
| Date:  | August 1, 2008           |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                          |
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ Joseph L. Herring         |   |
|   | Joseph L. Herring             |
|   | Chairman of the Board and     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices 

# Order

October 3, 2017

151028

- 9

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151028

COA: 311356

Macomb CC: 2011

- 002189

- FC

ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151029

COA: 314604

Macomb CC: 2011

- 003549

- FH

ALBERT REGINALD ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the December 16,

2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

People v Comer (Docket No. 152713). On order of the Court, the case having been

decided on June 23, 2017, 500 Mich ___ (2017), the application is again considered.

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part

of the Court of A ppeals judgment addressing the Macomb Circuit Court’s sua sponte

order for resentencing, we VACATE the January 22, 2013 order of correction of the

judgment of sentence, issued in Macomb Circuit Court No. 2011

- 002189

- FC, and we

REMAND this case to the trial court to reinstate the June 27, 2012 judgment of sentence.

In Comer , we held that correcting an invalid sentence by adding a statutorily mandated

term is a substantive correction that a trial court may make on its own initiative only

before judgment is e ntered. In this case, the trial court did not have authority to amend

the judgment of sentence after entry to add a provision for lifetime electronic monitoringI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 3, 2017

s0925 2

Clerk under MCL 750.520b(2)(d) and MCL 750.520n. In all other respects, leave to appeal is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be

reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.2



TWIN RIVER WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of
Twin River Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stephen H. Capp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | April 1, 2019 | By: | /s/ STEPHEN H. CAPP                                 
|----- | ------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------
|      |               |     | Stephen H. Capp                                     
|      |               |     | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and will not be
deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         264,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,022,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (184,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,740,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,834,621
<PP&E>                                       4,877,858
<DEPRECIATION>                               (330,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,568,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,465,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       180,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,568,584
<SALES>                                        281,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               643,666
<CGS>                                           85,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             279,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (543,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   200,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (343,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (343,196)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53467-53468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, 
September 10, 2008, at 5 p.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matter will attend the Closed Meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and 
(9) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(8) and (9), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar as duty officer, voted to consider the item 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
September 10, 2008, will be: A matter related to a financial 
institution.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.


[[Page 53468]]


    Dated: September 10, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21607 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  Re:   GSAMP Trust 2006-HE3 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through
  Certificates, Series 2006-HE3, issued pursuant to the Pooling and
  Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing
  Agreement"), among GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Litton
  Loan Servicing LP, as a Servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., as a
  Servicer, Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as a Servicer, J.P. Morgan Trust
  Company, National Association, as a Custodian, U.S. Bank National
  Association, as a Custodian, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as a
  Custodian, LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Wells
  Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator and Master Servicer, GSAMP
  Trust 2006-HE3.

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A ("Annual Report"),
     and all reports on Form 10-D (collectively with this Annual Report,
     the "Reports") required to be filed in respect of period covered by
     this Annual Report, of the Trust;

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
     any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
     fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
     with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this Annual Report is included in the Reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the compliance statements required in this
     Annual Report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its obligations
     under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria required
     to be included in this Annual Report in accordance with Item 1122 of
     Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
     included as an exhibit to this Annual Report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this Annual Report.  Any material instances of
     non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
     Annual Report.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     LaSalle Bank National Association as Trustee, Select Portfolio Servicing,
     Inc. as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer and Wells
     Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator.


     Dated:  June 30, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Michelle Gill, Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-266-01-SM

Irene Nutter

O R D E R

Defendant, by her counsel, has moved for a determination of

mental competency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. Based upon

defense counsel’s representations as to defendant’s interactions

with him, the observations and concerns of U.S. Probation Officer

Linehan and the court’s own observations, I find reasonable cause

to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a

mental disease or defect that could affect his competency to

stand trial. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b) and 4247(b), the

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General for

a period not to exceed thirty days for placement in a suitable

facility where an examination of the defendant’s mental condition

can be conducted. The director of the facility may apply for a

reasonable extension as provided by 18 U.S.C. § 4247(b). The

examining officials shall prepare a report of their findings

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(b), which report shall be filed with

Case 1:05-cr-00266-SM Document 23 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
2

this court. The Court requests prior notification of the date of

the defendant’s return to this jurisdiction after the examination

so that a prompt competency hearing and detention hearing may be

held. 

The motion (document no. 21) is granted. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 21, 2006

cc: Mark S. Zuckerman, AUSA

 Michael J. Iacopino, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00266-SM Document 23 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2