alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Subsidiaries
    of ORBCOMM Inc.
   Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of Organization

% OwnedORBCOMM LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM License Corp.

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM Canada Inc.

New Brunswick,
    Canada

100%ORBCOMM Curacao Gateway N.V.

Curacao

100%ORBCOMM International Holdings LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM New Zealand Limited

New Zealand

100%ORBCOMM de Honduras, S.A.

Honduras

100%ORBCOMM Guatemala S.A.

Guatemala

100%Bonimix S.A.

Uruguay

100%ORBCOMM de Nicaragua S.A.

Nicaragua

100%ORBCOMM de El Salvador S.A.

El Salvador

100%ORBCOMM Peru S.A.

Peru

100%ORBCOMM AFRICA (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)

South Africa

100%Leosatellite Services de Ecuador S.A.

Ecuador

100%ORBCOMM Panama Incorporated Inc.

Panama

100%ORBCOMM Central America Holdings LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM Australia Gateway Company Pty. Limited

Australia

100%Stellar Satellite Communications Ltd.

British Virgin Islands

100%ORBCOMM LIS LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM China LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM South AFRICA Gateway Company LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM Terrestrial LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM International Holdings 1 LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM International Holdings 2 LLC

Delaware

100%ORBCOMM International Holdings 3 LLC

Delaware

100%Satcom International Group PLC

England and Wales

52.13%ORBCOMM Europe LLC

Delaware

50%MITE Global Communications S.A. de C.V.

Mexico

35%ORBCOMM Maghreb

Morocco

22.96%European Datacomm Holding NV

Belgium

1.82%
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 26

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that certain trust funds are outside the budget of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that certain trust funds are outside

the budget of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 26 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The receipts (including attributable in3 terest) and outlays of the following trust funds shall not

4 be counted as receipts or outlays of the United States:

5 the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund,

6 the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal

7 Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Supple8 mentary Medical Insurance Trust Fund, the Civil Service

9 Retirement and Disability Fund, and the Department of

10 Defense Military Retirement Fund.

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall enforce and implement

12 this Article by appropriate legislation.

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. This Article shall take effect beginning

14 with the first fiscal year beginning at least 180 days after

15 its ratification.’’.

Æ
NUMBER 13-22-00236-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE KIRBY OFFSHORE MARINE OPERATING, LLC

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On May 24, 2022, relator Kirby Offshore Marine Operating, LLC filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering a new 

trial without stating specific reasons for the new trial, and relator lacks an adequate 

remedy by appeal to address this abuse of discretion. 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Southern Recycling, LLC, or any 

others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to 
2

the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of 

this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

24th day of May, 2022.
#### James Monteleon, Respondent, v Joann Monteleon, Respondent, and Anthony J. Pirrotti, Nonparty Appellant.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, Anthony J. Pirrotti, the former attorney for the defendant wife appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered January 13, 1989, as, after a hearing, denied his motion, *inter alia,*to set aside a stipulation of settlement of the action and for an award of attorney’s fees and for a hearing and determination as to attorney’s fees owed to him in quantum meruit.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant-respondent.

The Supreme Court properly denied the nonparty appellant’s motion to set aside the stipulation of settlement entered into between the parties. Prior to entering into the stipulation, the nonparty appellant informed the defendant wife by letter dated May 2, 1988, that he was going to request the court to relieve him as counsel. Then, on May 13, 1988, several days before entering into the stipulation, the defendant wife unequivocally stated to the Family Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), in a related proceeding, that she no longer wanted Mr. Pirrotti to represent her. Thus, the non-party appellant lacks standing to question the actions taken by the parties in settling their dispute, and there is no reason to set aside the settlement, which the parties entered into freely *(see, Pemberton v Dolphin Dev. Corp.,*134 AD2d 23, 25-26; *cf., Moustakas v Bouloukos,*112 AD2d 981, 982-984).

We also find that the court properly denied that branch of the nonparty appellant’s motion which was for an immediate hearing and determination as to the fees owed to him in quantum meruit for his representation of the defendant wife *(see, Theroux v Theroux,*145 AD2d 625, 626-627; *Shatzkin v Shahmoon,*19 AD2d 658, 659). Ordinarily, an attorney who is discharged without cause is entitled to a hearing to determine the amount of attorney’s fees when the client needs the files in the attorney’s possession to continue with an action *(see, Teichner v W & J Holsteins,*64 NY2d 977, 979; *Ventola v Ventola,*112 AD2d 291, 292; *Rosen v Rosen,*97 AD2d 837, 838). However, here the client does not need any of the files *373held by the discharged attorney, because the parties here settled their dispute. Thus, “the discharged attorney is relegated to commencing a plenary action to recover the reasonable value of his services” *(Theroux v Theroux, supra,*at 626-627; *see, Shatzkin v Shahmoon, supra).*Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.  |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | TETRAGENEX      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                               | /s/ Neil      Martucci                     |
|   |                                              | Neil      Martucci |
|   |                                              | Chief      Financial Officer |
|   |                                              |   |
|   | April      15, 2010                               |

----
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget
Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Stephen P. Reynolds,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.











Date:  November
      5, 2008/s/Stephen P. ReynoldsStephen
      P. ReynoldsChairman,
      President and
              Chief
      Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MATTHEW TIMOTHY,

Defendant.

4:23CR3059

ORDER

Defense counsel has moved to withdraw because Defendant is not 

satisfied with counsel's representation. (Filing No. 22). Defendant is eligible for 

appointed counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, and 

the Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Nebraska.

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defense counsel's motion to appoint new counsel, (Filing No. 22), is

granted. Korey Reiman is hereby withdrawn as counsel and shall

promptly notify Defendant of the entry of this order.

2) The clerk shall delete Korey Reiman from any future ECF

notifications herein.

3) The clerk shall forward this memorandum and order to the Federal 

Public Defender.

4) The Federal Public Defender shall forthwith provide the court with a 

draft appointment order (CJA Form 20) bearing the name and other 

identifying information of the CJA Panel attorney identified in 

accordance with the Criminal Justice Act Plan for this district. .

5) The newly appointed counsel shall promptly file an entry of 

appearance on behalf of Defendant.

6) A telephonic conference with counsel will be held before the 

undersigned magistrate judge at 10:00 a.m. on December 12, 2023

to discuss setting any change of plea hearing, or the date of the jury 

trial and deadlines for disclosing experts as required under Rule 16. 

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-CRZ Doc # 25 Filed: 11/29/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 42
Counsel for all parties shall use the conferencing instructions 

provided by the court to participate in the call.

7) The court finds that the time between November 27, 2023 and 

December 12, 2023 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act because 

Defendant’s counsel was unable to prepare for trial while counsel 

representation was in dispute, and failing to grant additional time 

might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & 

(B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court’s 

local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

Dated this 29th day of November, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cr-03059-JMG-CRZ Doc # 25 Filed: 11/29/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 43
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000142 12-SEP-2014 08:12 AM
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21540]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER08-637-000; ER08-637-001; ER08-637-004; ER08-637-005]

Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice of 
Technical Conference

September 9, 2008.
    Take notice that on November 12, 2008, a technical conference will 
be convened to consider issues related to the Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc.'s proposal to offer Market 
Coordination Service (Market Service), as discussed in the order issued 
June 13, 2008 in Docket Nos. ER08-637-000 and ER08-637-001.\1\ The 
technical conference will be held in the Commission Meeting Room at the 
headquarters of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC, 20426 from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (ET).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Midwest Indep. Transmission Sys. Operator, Inc., 123 FERC ] 
61,265, at P 155 (2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The technical conference will be divided into two sessions. The 
morning session will be led by the Commissioners and will address broad 
policy issues associated with Market Service. The afternoon session 
will be led by Commission staff and will address certain technical 
aspects of Market Service. Subsequent notices will be issued regarding 
the details of this technical conference.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to [email protected] or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21540 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 10.2


 


2005 Annual Incentive Compensation Award Formula
Components


 


The performance metrics
for calculating 2005 annual incentive compensation are:


 


•                  Combined Ratio of Chubb’s property
and casualty insurance subsidiaries; and


•                  Chubb’s 2005 operating income.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

Expressing Congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the Department 
               of Energy with respect to clothes washers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

 Mr. Knollenberg introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing Congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the Department 
               of Energy with respect to clothes washers.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Secretary of Energy relating to clothes washers 
(66 Fed. Reg. 3314; January 12, 2001), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

JFL Enterprises & Holdings, LLC, et al

v. Case No. 04-cv-314-JD

Town of New Boston, et al

O R D E R

The court entered an order dismissing the above case on June 23, 2005 and

judgment on June 27, 2005 for failure to comply with the June 1, 2005 order to either enter

an appearance pro se, or have counsel file an appearance. An appearance was filed by

counsel on June 20, 2005 and not docketed before the above orders were entered. Due to

clerical error the above case was closed. 

It is hereby ordered that the Order dated June 23, 2005 and the Judgment dated

June 27, 2005 are vacated, and the case is reopened.

Case 1:04-cv-00314-JD Document 56 Filed 06/29/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

June 29, 2005 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Gordon R. Blakeney, Jr., Esq.

Stephen A. Duggan, Esq.

Charles Bauer, Esq.

R. Peter Taylor, Esq.

John Paul Kacavas, Esq.

David L. Nixon, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00314-JD Document 56 Filed 06/29/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit








May 9, 2019


Mr. Mark Pearson 
AXA Equitable Holdings, Inc. 
1290 Avenue of the Americas, 16th floor 
New York, New York 10104 


Dear Mr. Pearson: 


This letter confirms our understanding regarding your waiver in connection with your employment agreement dated March 9, 2011 (the “Agreement”).  Please confirm this understanding by signing below. 


The Agreement provides that you will serve as the Chair of the Board of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (“AEL Chair”) during your employment term.  The Agreement further provides that you may terminate your employment for “Good Reason” and receive certain severance benefits if you are removed as AEL Chair.


Mr. Ramon de Oliveira was appointed as AEL Chair on March 26, 2019.  As discussed, you have agreed that you will waive your right under the Agreement to terminate your employment for Good Reason due to your removal as AEL Chair so long as Mr. de Oliveira serves as AEL Chair.  By signing below, you confirm that you have irrevocably waived this right.






Sincerely,






/s/ Jeff Hurd        
Jeff Hurd
Chief Operating Officer


            








ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:




/s/ Mark Pearson        
Mark Pearson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-64-01-SM

Timothy Tremblay

O R D E R

Defendant Tremblay’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 8). Defendant Tremblay has filed a Waiver of

Speedy Trial. Trial has been rescheduled for the January 2006 trial period. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: December 16, 2005 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 4, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00064-SM Document 13 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 19, 2005

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00064-SM Document 13 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7066 

To require United States financial institutions to ensure entities and persons 

owned or controlled by the institution comply with financial sanctions 

on the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus to the same 

extent as the institution itself, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2022 

Mr. SHERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require United States financial institutions to ensure 

entities and persons owned or controlled by the institution comply with financial sanctions on the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus to the same extent 

as the institution itself, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Russia and Belarus 

5 Financial Sanctions Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7066 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—A United States financial institu3 tion shall take all actions necessary and available to cause 

4 any entity or person owned or controlled by the institution 

5 to comply with any provision of law described in sub6 section (b) to the same extent as required of a United 

7 States financial institution. 

8 (b) PROVISION OF LAW DESCRIBED.—A provision of 

9 law described in this subsection is any prohibition or limi10 tation described in statute, regulation or order applicable 

11 to a United States financial institution concerning the 

12 Russian Federation or the Republic of Belarus, involv13 ing— 

14 (1) the conduct of transactions; 

15 (2) the acceptance of deposits; 

16 (3) the making, granting, transferring, holding, 

17 or brokering of loans or credits; 

18 (4) the purchasing or selling of foreign ex19 change, securities, commodity futures, or options; 

20 (5) the procuring of purchasers and sellers de21 scribed under paragraph (4) as principal or agent; 

22 or 

23 (6) any other good or service provided by a 

24 United States financial institution. 

25 (c) PENALTY.—A United States financial institution 

26 that violates subsection (a) shall be subject to the penalties 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7066 IH

1 described in the applicable statute, regulation or order ap2 plicable to a United States financial Institution. 

3 (d) UNITED STATES FINANCIAL INSTITUTION DE4 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘United States financial 

5 institution’’ has the meaning given the term ‘‘U.S. finan6 cial institution’’ under section 561.309 of title 31, Code 

7 of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.5


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the
best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.




                                         /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                         PSEG Power LLC
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         May 5, 2005
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 *


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence A.
Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
---------------------------------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)       May 14, 2008


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.