alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 34078.

Department One.

October 17, 1957.]

#### *In the Matter of the Application of*James Louis Bastian *for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.*James Louis Bastian, *Petitioner,*v. Merle R. Schneckloth, *as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.*
      *2*

*W. J. Murphy*and *Orville E. Peebles,*for petitioner.

*The Attorney General*and *Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant,*for respondent.

Reported in 316 P. (2d) 1105.

Per Curiam.

The petitioner was found guilty of the crime of taking a motor vehicle without the permission of the owner in violation of RCW 9.54.020, Rem. Rev. Stat. § 2601-1. The trial court entered judgment and sentence that the petitioner be imprisoned for a period of not more than twenty years.

For the reasons indicated in *In re Klapproth v. Squier*(1957), 50 Wn. (2d) 675, 314 P. (2d) 430, and in *In re Richey v. Squier*(1957), *ante*p. 38, 315 P. (2d) 638, it is necessary to correct the sentence pronounced by changing the maximum from twenty to ten years, as provided by RCW 9.92.010, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2265.

The respondent is directed to produce the petitioner in the court where he was convicted, and where judgment and sentence was pronounced; and that court is directed to impose a corrected sentence, as indicated in this opinion and in the cases cited.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53051-53052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


President's Committee on the National Medal of Science; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: President's Committee on the National Medal of Science 
(1182).
    Date and Time: Monday, October 27, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 375, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ms. Mayra Montrose, Program Manager, Room 1282, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: 703-292-4757.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
President in the selection of the 2008 National Medal of Science 
recipients.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The nominations being reviewed include 
information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute 
unwarranted invasions of personal privacy.

[[Page 53052]]

These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) of the Government 
in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 9, 2008.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-21244 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

MARVEL JONES,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MADISON COUNTY, a political 

subdivision, et al.

Defendants.

8:23-CV-182

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1. On the Court's own motion, the deadline for completing 

service of process is extended to February 14, 2024. 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall set a case management deadline 

for February 14, 2024. 

Dated this 29th day of December, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

John M. Gerrard

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00182-JMG-SMB Doc # 29 Filed: 12/29/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 331
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         993,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,618,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,335,951
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,545,013
<PP&E>                                         591,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,037,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,320,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           317
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,650,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,037,429
<SALES>                                      2,418,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,484,366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,276,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               305,782
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (742,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (769,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (769,348)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The State, ex rel. Schunk, a Minor, v. Hamilton et al., Judges.

(No. 24446

Decided December 20, 1933.)

*Messrs. Benner & Benner,*for relator.

*Mr. Louis J. Schneider,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Walter M. Loche,*and *Mr. 1. Jach Martin,*for respondents.

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the relator for a writ of mandamus and the demurrer of the respondents thereto, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the demurrer be, and the same hereby is, sustained for the reason that a court of record speaks through its journal and its journal in this cause discloses that the cause is still pending on a rehearing; and for the further reason that a writ of mandamus does not lie where there is an adequate remedy at law to correct an erroneous judgment by proceedings in error.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.1

The Trustee and Unitholders
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust:

Re: Registration Statements Nos. 333-89164 (Form S-3) and 333-103952 (Form S-3).

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated April 18, 2003, related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report
is not considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by
an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
May 8, 2003
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10Q of PVC Container Corporation ("PVCC") for the
period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip L. Friedman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of PVC Container Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PVCC.

/s/ Phillip L. Friedman
---------------------------------------------
Name:   Phillip L. Friedman
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   February 14, 2003



                                                                              19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,197,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  877,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (706,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,991,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         212,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (197,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,149,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     21,838,000
<COMMON>                                       532,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (29,265,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,149,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               287,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             669,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (868,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (868,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.19)
<FN>
<F1> CURRENT ASSETS AND CURRENT LIABILITIES VALUES
     ARE ZERO BECAUSE OF AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
        

</TABLE>
CHARLES E. ROOD JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4146

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

Charles E. Rood Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *342Thurman Scott, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curd, J.), rendered April 23, 1985, as amended November 19, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The defendant was excluded from his *Sandoval*hearing, which was conducted in chambers. This constituted a violation of his statutory and constitutional right to be present at all "material stages” of his trial *(see,*US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 6; *Snyder v Massachusetts,*291 US 97, 105-106; *People v Cain,*76 NY2d 119; *People v Mehmedi,*69 NY2d 759, 760-761; *People v Ciaccio,*47 NY2d 431, 436-437). A *Sandoval*hearing is certainly one phase of trial during which the defendant’s presence "has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend against the charge.” *(Snyder v Massachusetts, supra,*at 105-106.) Accordingly, in *People v Jenkins*(157 AD2d 854), and *People v Peterson*(151 AD2d 512) we held that a *Sandoval*hearing constitutes a material stage of trial, at which the defendant has a right to be present. There is no proof of an express waiver of this right in this case *(cf., People v Peterson, supra)*and the error in excluding the defendant cannot be considered harmless *(see, e.g., People v Cain, supra; People v Mehmedi, supra).*The judgment under review, as amended, must therefore be reversed, and we need not pass on any other issue including those raised in the defendant’s supplemental *pro se*brief. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Security Education Board Group of Advisors Meeting

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board Group of 
Advisors. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make 
recommendations to the Board concerning requirements established by the 
David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VIII of Public 
Law 102-183, as amended.

DATES: September 23, 2008 (0800-1200).

ADDRESSES: Liaison Capital Hill,415 New Jersey Ave, NW., Washington, DC 
20001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Kevin Gormley, Program Officer, 
National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, 
Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. 
Electronic mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b0c243926272e32200b252f3e652e2f3e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cd8aa2bfa0a1a8b4a68da3a9b8e3a8a9b8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Security Education Board Group 
of Advisors meeting is open to the public. The public is afforded the 
opportunity to submit written statements associated with NSEP.

    Dated: September 9, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E8-21702 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(July 12, 1990)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert S. Anthony, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered June 26, 1987, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the third degree.

Appeal dismissed, as moot. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
                    BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND UNAUDITED
                    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
                    THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                    SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000081699
<NAME>                        RTI INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                           1,270,579
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      581,482
<ALLOWANCES>                         1,100
<INVENTORY>                      1,118,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,234,513
<PP&E>                           2,544,482
<DEPRECIATION>                   1,698,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,672,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              747,667
<BONDS>                            270,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                           118,495
<OTHER-SE>                      17,104,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,672,153
<SALES>                            217,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   238,465
<CGS>                              324,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      578,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (267,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (266,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                        (427)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                      (267,322)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.22)
        


</TABLE>
1Walsh attempts to allege additional claims against

additional defendants in his complaint. In the Report and

Recommendation issued simultaneously with this Order, I recommend

that all of the claims alleged, except the false arrest claims

against the arresting officers, be dismissed.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Patrick Walsh

v. Civil No. 05-cv-188-JD

Concord Police Department, et al.

ORDER

Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Patrick Walsh filed

a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that he was subjected

to false arrest on May 31, 2002. Walsh alleges that he was

arrested by two Concord Police officers without probable cause.1

The complaint is before me for preliminary review to determine

whether, among other things, it states any claim upon which

relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; United States

District Court for the District of New Hampshire Local Rule

(“LR”) 4.3(d)(2).

As explained fully in the Report and Recommendation issued

simultaneously with this Order, I authorize the false arrest

Case 1:05-cv-00188-JD Document 8 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 3
2

claim to proceed against the two police officers who arrested

Walsh. Walsh has not yet named the officers, however, referring

to them only as John Doe #1 and John Doe #2. In order to proceed

with this action, Walsh must obtain the names of the John Doe

officers and file an amendment to his complaint naming the

officers, and complete and submit to the Clerk’s Office summons

forms with the John Doe defendants’ names so that the complaint

may be served within 120 days of the date of this Order. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

Once Walsh has submitted the required summons forms, I order

the complaint to be served on those defendants. The Clerk’s

office is directed to issue the necessary summons forms and

forward to the United States Marshal for the District of New

Hampshire (the “U.S. Marshal’s office”) the summonses and copies

of the complaint, the Report and Recommendation issued

simultaneously with this Order, and this Order. Upon receipt of

the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s office shall

effect service upon defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). 

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Case 1:05-cv-00188-JD Document 8 Filed 12/06/05 Page 2 of 3
3

Walsh is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 6, 2005

cc: Patrick Walsh, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00188-JD Document 8 Filed 12/06/05 Page 3 of 3
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1995, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,183,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,797,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (976,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  9,099,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         405,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (316,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,957,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     21,413,000
<COMMON>                                       332,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (21,087,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,957,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               250,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             575,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (683,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (683,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)
<FN>
<F1>Current assets and current liabilities values are zero because of an unclassified balance sheet.
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.1

                    COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE




                                                Three Months    Six Months
                                                   Ended          Ended
                                                  June 30,       June 30,
                                                    1997           1997
                                                ------------    ----------
Shares

Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                             3,948,703      3,948,703
Additional shares assuming conversion of:
   Stock options and warrants                       168,325        166,823
                                                 ----------     ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding               4,117,028      4,115,526
                                                 ==========     ==========

Net income                                       $1,031,000     $2,085,000
                                                 ==========     ==========

Primary earnings per share                       $     0.25     $     0.51
                                                 ==========     ==========