alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-1713

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                       LUIS MORO-HERNANDEZ,

                      Defendant, Appellant.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

         [Hon. Daniel R. Dom¡nguez, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                      Stahl, Circuit Judge,
                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                


     Edgar R. Vega Pabon on brief for appellant.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jose A. Quiles-
Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Camille Velez-Rive,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.





October 19, 1998



                                
                                


                                          Per Curiam.  Upon careful review of the briefs and
    record, we conclude that the district court properly
    interpreted U.S.S.G. � 4A1.1(d) in calculating defendant's
    criminal history category.  
              Defendant's prior diversionary disposition was
    properly "counted as a sentence" under � 4A1.2(f).  It follows
    that the diversionary disposition was "a sentence countable
    under � 4A1.2."  Therefore the diversionary disposition was a
    "criminal justice sentence" for purposes of � 4A1.1(d),
    application note 4.  We find no merit in defendant's argument
    that the plain words of the application note should be read
    otherwise.  And because the instant offense was committed while
    defendant was under that diversionary disposition, the district
    court properly applied � 4A1.1(d) to add two points to
    defendant's criminal history score.
              Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

M.R. and C.B.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-292-SM

Brookline School District

ORDER

Re: Document No. 18, Motion For Leave To File Amended 

Complaint

Ruling: Plaintiffs are granted permission to amend the

complaint only as it relates to matters addressed in the January

2006 proceeding but are denied permission to introduce other new

issues not raised at either hearing. Plaintiffs must submit a

complaint which complies with this order. The “Candice Lambert”

false testimony claim was the crux of the January reopening and

may be added by amendment.

James R. Muirhead

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Date: May 15, 2006

cc: Dean B. Eggert, Esq.

 Theresa Kraft, Esq.

 

 

Case 1:05-cv-00292-JL Document 20 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 10, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. PrivateBancorp, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of The PrivateWealth Trust Company, a federal 
savings bank (in organization), Chicago, Illinois, and thereby engage 
in operating a savings bank pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 10, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-21452 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service gives notice of the following meeting: 

# DATE AND TIME: 

Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 4 p.m.-5:30 p.m. 

# PLACE: 

Corporation for National and Community Service; 8th Floor; 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. 

# STATUS:

 Open. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

I. Chair's Opening Comments and Swearing in of New Members. 

II. Consideration of Prior Meeting's Minutes. 

III. CEO Report. 

IV. Committee Reports: Management and Governance Committee Report and Consideration of Revisions to the Corporation's Strategic Plan Targets; Program and Evaluation Committee Report; and Strategic Partnerships Committee Report. 

V. Honoring Departing Board Members. 

VI. Public Comment. 

# Accommodations: 

Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5 p.m. Monday, September 15, 2008. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Lisa Guccione, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the CEO, Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10207, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6637. Fax (202) 606-3460. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail:                         *lguccione@cns.gov.*

Dated: September 9, 2008. 

Frank R. Trinity, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. E8-21633 Filed 9-11-08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      210,074
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          41,845
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        34,250
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,169
<COMMON>                                         1,244
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       42,188
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             50,547
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  93,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            86,818
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              19,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,246
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  79,326
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  286,169
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       53,052
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,205
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      44,573
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      46,778
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          6,274
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 125
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   6,399
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,067
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,332
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         70
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,262
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,194
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,764
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           3,301
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.43


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. Case No. 04-cr-216-01-SM

James Tobin

ORDER

Re: Document No. 105, Motion in Limine re: to exclude

evidence of advice of counsel 

Ruling: Granted in part and denied in part. Defendant may

elicit evidence of alleged co-conspirators’ receipt of legal advice

to establish critical times or dates relevant to the charges, and

to support a claim that no agreement or conspiracy, as charged,

came into existence at a time that defendant could have joined it.

 Counsel shall not elicit evidence of the legal advice given,

however, before first notifying the court and opposing counsel and

obtaining the court’s express permission.

 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: December 2, 2005

cc: All counsel of record 

Case 1:04-cr-00216-SM Document 120 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:05-cv-00255-PB Document 9 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Porta Systems Corp. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William V. Carney, the
Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  and I,  Edward B.  Kornfeld,  Chief
Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  do hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated May 12, 2004                                   /s/ William V. Carney
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     William V. Carney
                                                     Whief Executive Officer

Dated May 12, 2004                                   /s/ Edward B. Kornfeld
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Edward B. Kornfeld
                                                     Ehief Financial Officer

This   certification   accompanies   each  Report  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                 Page 16 of 16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-275-01-SM

Laurie Lugocki

O R D E R

Defendant Lugocki’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 9). Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2006

trial period. Defendant Lugocki shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than March 3, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, her continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: July 21, 2006 at 11:00 a.m.

Jury Selection: August 1, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00275-SM Document 10 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 27, 2006

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00275-SM Document 10 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit  31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Todd Pittman, certify that:

 

**1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Sanchez Computer Associates, Inc.**

** **

**2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;**

** **

**3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;**

** **

**4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:**

** **

**(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;**

** **

**(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and**

** **

**(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and**

** **

**5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:**

** **

**(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and**

** **

**(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.**

 

 

Dated: August 14, 2003

 
|   | /s/  TODD A. PITTMAN                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | *Todd A.  Pittman,**Chief Financial Officer* |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

LUKE LEFEVER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, in their 

Official and Individual capacities; SCOTT 

FRAKES, in their Official and Individual 

capacities; DR. DEOL, in their Official and 

Individual capacities; WARDEN 

WASAMER, in their Official and Individual 

capacities; WARDEN GABLE, in their 

Official and Individual capacities; 

CRUNSHANK, A.W., in their Official and 

Individual capacities; KEVIN WILKEN, 

P.L.I.O, in their Official and Individual 

capacities; SARA ALLEN, D.O.N., in their 

Official and Individual capacities; 

OLTROGGE, U.M., in their Official and 

Individual capacities; DOMINO, U.M., in 

their Official and Individual capacities; 

SCHULTS, C.O., in their Official and 

Individual capacities; DE LOS SANTOS, 

C.O., in their Official and Individual 

capacities; and UNKNOWN POLICY 

WRITERS, in their Official and Individual 

capacities;

Defendants.

8:23CV187

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Correction, Filing No. 

21, and Motion for Status, Filing No. 22. Both motions are granted.

8:23-cv-00187-JFB-PRSE Doc # 23 Filed: 04/22/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 131
2

In response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Status the Court provides the following 

information regarding Plaintiff’s case. On August 28, 2023, the Plaintiff filed a motion to 

amend his complaint and a proposed amended complaint (the “Complaint”). Filing No. 

12; Filing No. 13. On September 1, 2023, this Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s 

motion to amend and instructing him to sign and file the signature page for the Complaint. 

Filing No. 20 at 6. The signature page was received by this Court on September 11, 2023. 

See Filing No. 13-1.

That same day Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Relief Correction seeking to correct 

a typographical error in his Complaint. Filing No. 21. The Court now grants the motion

for relief correction and shall consider the correction when reviewing his Complaint. 

As Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. 11, 

and as his initial partial filing fee of $4.00 has been received, see Text Entry dated June

15, 2023, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review 

of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in due course. 

Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Relief 

Correction and for Status, Filing Nos. 21 & 22, are granted, and the case shall progress 

consistent with this Memorandum and Order.

Dated this 22nd day of April, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Court

8:23-cv-00187-JFB-PRSE Doc # 23 Filed: 04/22/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 132
Exhibit








                                            
Exhibit 10.6




SCHEDULE OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO THE FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT 10.5
NAME 
Damon J. Audia
Judith L. Bacchus
Peter A. Dragich
Jan Kees van Gaalen
Michelle Keating
Ronald L. Port
Carlonda R. Reilly
Christopher Rossi
Patrick S. Watson
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

AARON FICHTER, Trustee of 

Contractors Laborers, Teamsters and 

Engineers Health & Welfare Plan and 

Trustee of Contractors Laborers, 

Teamsters and Engineers Pension Plan; 

KIM QUICK, Trustee of Contractors 

Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers 

Health & Welfare Plan and Trustee of 

Contractors Laborers, Teamsters and 

Engineers Pension Plan; RON 

KAMINSKI, Trustee of Contractors 

Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers 

Health & Welfare Plan and Trustee of 

Contractors Laborers, Teamsters and 

Engineers Pension Plan; RON 

FUCINARO, Trustee of Contractors 

Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers 

Health & Welfare Plan and Trustee of 

Contractors Laborers, Teamsters and 

Engineers Pension Plan; JOSH 

RENDER, Trustee of Contractors 

Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers 

Health & Welfare Plan and Trustee of 

Contractors Laborers, Teamsters and 

Engineers Pension Plan; TIMOTHY 

MCCORMICK, Trustee of Contractors 

Laborers, Teamsters and Engineers 

Health & Welfare Plan and Trustee of 

Contractors Laborers, Teamsters and 

Engineers Pension Plan; 

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF 

OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 571, 

and LABORERS INTERNATIONAL 

UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 

1140,

Plaintiffs, 

8:23CV219

ORDER

8:23-cv-00219-JFB-CRZ Doc # 7 Filed: 07/24/23 Page 1 of 3 - Page ID # 94
vs. 

JUSTIN WIGGENS,

Defendant.

This matter comes before the court after a review of the docket and pursuant 

to NECivR 41.2, which states in relevant part: “At any time, after appropriate notice, 

a case not being prosecuted with reasonable diligence may be dismissed for lack 

of prosecution.”

The complaint was filed on May 24, 2023 (Filing No. 1). Plaintiffs filed a 

return of service indicating service on Defendant on May 30, 2023. (Filing No. 5). 

No answer or other responsive pleading has been filed. Plaintiff has a duty to 

prosecute the case and may, for example, seek default judgment in accordance 

with the applicable rules or take other action as appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall have until August 14, 2023 to show 

cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to NECivR 41.2 for want of 

prosecution. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of 

this action without further notice.

8:23-cv-00219-JFB-CRZ Doc # 7 Filed: 07/24/23 Page 2 of 3 - Page ID # 95
Dated this 24th day of July, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cv-00219-JFB-CRZ Doc # 7 Filed: 07/24/23 Page 3 of 3 - Page ID # 96