alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 369TH DISTRIC T COURT OF ANDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2 0 th
day of September, 2017 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

BRINDA REDWINE D/B/A TEXAS WORKING DOGS , Appellant

NO. 12

- 16

- 00123

- CV; Trial Court No. 369

- 12

- 4849

Opinion by Greg Neeley, Justice.

BRIAN PECKINPAUGH D/ B/A MONSTER MALAKS/N ATURAL BORN GUARDI ANS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the oral arguments, appellate record and the briefs filed herein; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of the Court tha t there was error in the judgment regarding exemplary damages awarded to Brian Peckinpaugh d/b/a Monster Malaks/Natural Born Guardians as entered by the trial court below and that the same

should be reversed and judgment rendered that Brian Peckingpaugh d/ b/a Monster Malaks/Natural Born Guardians takes nothing in exemplary damages, and that a portion of the trial court’s judgment should be modified and, as modified, is affirmed

.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the trial court’s judgmen t
below be reversed insofar as it awards exemplary damages to Brian Peckinpaugh d/b/a Monster

Malaks/Natural Born Guardians and judgment rendered that Brian Peckinpaugh d/b/a Monster

Malaks/Natural Born Guardians takes nothing in exemplary damages ; that Pa ragraph 3 of the trial court’s judgment be modified by deleting the award of prejudgment interest “in the sum of $81,750.00 (Eighty One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars)” and replacing it with an award of prejudgment interest “in the amount of $41,846.00 (FORTY

- ONE

THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY

- SIX AND NO/100 DOLLARS) ; ” the remainder of the trial court’s judgment is affirmed as modified ; and that this decision be certified to the trial

court below for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to o bserve the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 1 st day of Dec ember, 2017.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 15, 2011 | /s/ Stuart Goldfarb                                             |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Stuart Goldfarb                                                 |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer and DirectorPrincipal Executive Officer |
|                  |                                                            |
| Date: August 15, 2011 | /s/ Thomas Plotts                                               |
|                  | Thomas Plotts                                                   |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer                                         |
|                  | Principal Financial Officer                                     |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         165,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,422,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                   244,692
<INVENTORY>                                 10,762,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,462,149
<PP&E>                                      47,929,144
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,998,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,931,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,219,175
<BONDS>                                     18,077,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,047
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,564,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,931,155
<SALES>                                     30,024,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,050,150
<CGS>                                       23,170,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,919,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             456,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,678,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                   678,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            995,604
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   995,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the Companies) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Stephen P.
Reynolds, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |                                      
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2003 |                                      
|                     |                                      
|                     | /s/ Stephen P. Reynolds              
|                     |                                      
|                     | Stephen P. Reynolds                  
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (08-064)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Astrophysics Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific and technical information relevant to program planning. 

# DATES:

Monday, October 6, 2008, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 9 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. 

# ADDRESSES:

Courtyard by Marriott and Conference Center, Saturn Conference Room, 3435 North Atlantic Avenue, Cocoa Beach, FL 32931. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4452, fax (202) 358-4118, or                         *mnorris@nasa.gov*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:
      ( print page 53446)    
—Astrophysics Division Update. 

—Joint Dark Energy Mission Update. 

—Astrophysics Goals Overview. 

—Astrophysics on the Moon Discussion.

                    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Attendees will be requested to sign a register. For further information, contact Marian Norris via e-mail at                     *mnorris@nasa.gov*                     or by telephone at (202) 358-4452.                 

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. E8-21606 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
#### The State, ex rel. The Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y., *v.*Floyd, City Aud.

(No. 24407

Decided November 15, 1933.)

*Mr. Daniel 8. Webber, Jr.,*and *Mr. David T. Keating,*for relator.

*Mr. W. A. Adams,*city solicitor, for respondent.

It appearing to the court that an alternative writ of mandamus has heretofore been issued in this cause and duly served upon the defendant, and it further appearing that said defendant, through the city solicitor of New Boston, Ohio, has advised the court that said city is willing to pay the sum claimed by the plaintiff; and said defendant being now in default for answer or demurrer to the petition, it is ordered and adjudged that the alternative writ heretofore allowed be, and the same hereby is, made permanent, and the said defendant, Jarvis Floyd, City Auditor of the City of New Boston, Ohio, is commanded to issue a voucher payable to the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New Yorb in the total sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Eighty-one Dollars and ninety-nine cents.

*Writ allowed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        Washington, D.C. 20549

                      ___________________________

                               FORM 10-Q

              Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)

                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                   ________________________________

 For the Quarter ended  March 31, 1998 Commission File Number  1-5447 


                  PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD

    Pennsylvania                             25-6002536                
 (State of Organization)            (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

                       Telephone -(304)926-1124*

 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
 required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
 that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
 subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Yes   X        No      

 Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
 classes of common stock, as of the close of the period covered by this
 report.

          1,510,000 shares of beneficial interest, without par value.


                      ___________________________

 * Notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission
 for the registrant may be sent to Robert A. Hamstead, Secretary and
 Treasurer, #2 Port Amherst Drive, Charleston, WV 25306.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

NH Insurance Dept. Commissioner

v. Case No. 05-cv-278-SM

 

Employers Insurance of Wausau

O R D E R

The motion to consolidate (Doc. No. 6) is denied. On or

before November 28, 2005, the plaintiff shall file a motion for

entry of judgment in Case No. 05-cv-239-PB. The motion shall

note that the defendant has agreed to the entry of judgment in

the above-referenced action in exchange for the plaintiff’s

agreement not to seek to execute the judgment until the matters

raised in Case No. 05-CV-278-SM are finally resolved. The motion

shall also note that defendant’s counterclaim in Case No. 05-cv239-PB shall be dismissed without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 16, 2005

cc: Doreen F. Connor, Esq.

Andrew R. Levin, Esq.

Natasha Lisman, Esq. 

Peter C.I. Roth, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00239-PB Document 13 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1123

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

153 East 110th Street in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Tito Puente

Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 153 East 110th Street in New York, New

York, as the ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TITO PUENTE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

5 Postal Service located at 153 East 110th Street in New

6 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Tito Puente Post Office Building’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
2

•HR 1123 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Tito Puente Post Office

3 Building.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1147 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1147

     To prohibit the exportation of Alaskan North Slope crude oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2001

Mr. English (for himself, Ms. Hart, and Mr. Ryun of Kansas) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the exportation of Alaskan North Slope crude oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPORTATION OF ALASKAN NORTH SLOPE CRUDE OIL.

    Effective 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) no domestically produced crude oil transported by 
        pipeline over right-of-way granted pursuant to section 203 of 
        the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1652) 
        may be exported from the United States, or any commonwealth, 
        territory, or possession of the United States; and
            (2) subsections (s) and (u) of section 28 of the Mineral 
        Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 185(s) and (u)), and section 
        7(d) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 
        2406(d)), are repealed.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT.

    The President may, notwithstanding section 202 of the International 
Emergency Economic Powers Act, exercise the authorities he has under 
sections 203 and 205 of that Act to carry out the prohibition under 
section 1 of this Act, and the penalties provided in section 206 of the 
International Emergency Economic Powers Act shall apply to violations 
under this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boxwood Merger Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December
31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
M. Kadenacy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date:
March 25, 2019



| | /s/
    Stephen M. Kadenacy
| | ---------------------------
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| |
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-04-521-CR

MARIA LEONILA PEREZ	 						APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant's Motion To Withdraw Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 17, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 173 (Friday, September 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51859-51860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20563]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive 
Service

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Appointment to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive 
Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the

[[Page 51860]]

following appointments to the NRC Performance Review Boards.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Performance Review Board (PRB) responsible for making recommendations 
to the appointing and awarding authorities on performance appraisal 
ratings and performance awards for Senior Executives and Senior Level 
employees:
    Darren B. Ash, Deputy Executive Director for Corporate Management, 
Office of the Executive Director for Operations.
    R.W. Borchardt, Executive Director for Operations.
    Elmo E. Collins, Jr., Regional Administrator, Region IV.
    Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel.
    Margaret M. Doane, Director, Office of International Programs.
    James E. Dyer, Chief Financial Officer.
    Timothy F. Hagan, Director, Office of Administration.
    Michael R. Johnson, Director, Office of New Reactors.
    Eric J. Leeds, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    Bruce S. Mallet, Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and 
Preparedness Programs, Office of the Executive Director for Operations.
    Charles L. Miller, Director, Office of Federal and State Materials 
and Environmental Management Programs.
    Martin J. Virgilio, Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, 
Research, State,Tribal, and Compliance Programs.
    The following individuals will serve as members of the NRC PRB 
Panel that was established to review appraisals and make 
recommendations to the appointing and awarding authorities for NRC PRB 
members:
    Stephen G. Burns, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General 
Counsel.
    Brian W. Sheron, Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
    Roy P. Zimmerman, Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident 
Response.
    All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of 
Title 5 of the United States Code.

DATES: Effective Date: September 5, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Secretary, Executive Resources Board, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, (301) 492-
2076.

    Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 26th day of August 2008.

For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
James F. McDermott,
Secretary, Executive Resources Board.
[FR Doc. E8-20563 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-203-01-PB

Daniel Childs

ORDER

Re: Document No. , Motion for Clarification

RULING: Granted. I was not informed of the defendant's filing

and instead assumed that he intended to waive his right to

contest all of the elements of the charge arising from the second

robbery except the allegation that he acted with intimidation.

Severance would be warranted under those circumstances because

the first robbery would not be relevant to the intimidation

issue. However, as I explained during the hearing on the motion

to sever, evidence of the first robbery would be admissible in a

trial of the second robbery if the government is required to

prove all of the elements of the charge. Since the defendant

intends to require government to prove all of the elements of the

second robbery charge, evidence of the first robbery will be

admissible in the trial of the second robbery charge. Thus,

severance of the first and second robbery charges will not spare

the defendant from unfair prejudice. My order severing the

charges is vacated and the motion to sever is denied. 

 

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

U.S. District Judge

Date: 2/23/06

cc: Robert Veiga, Esq.

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

US Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00203-PB Document 21 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 1