alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1261 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1261

 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
 1992 to impose a limit on the Federal share of the costs of the Long 
 Beach Desalinization Research and Development Project in Los Angeles 
                          County, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2001

   Mr. Horn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
 1992 to impose a limit on the Federal share of the costs of the Long 
 Beach Desalinization Research and Development Project in Los Angeles 
                          County, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMIT ON FEDERAL COST OF THE LONG BEACH DESALINIZATION 
              RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.

    Section 1605(b)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h-3(b)(2)) is amended by striking 
``50 percent of the total'' and inserting ``the lesser of 50 percent of 
the total or $13,500,000''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-278-01-SM

Kenneth Beard

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 8) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than March 7, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:05-cr-00278-SM Document 9 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: April 21, 2006 at 4:30 PM 

Jury Selection: May 2, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 2, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Debra Walsh, Esq.

 Tony Soltani, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00278-SM Document 9 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Lisa Babel

v. Case No. 05-cv-206-SM

Curran Management Services, Inc.

Tammy Koehler

v. Case No. 05-cv-208-SM

Curran Management Services, Inc.

Re: Document No. 11, Response to Order to Show Cause

Ruling: 

While it is decidedly questionable whether this case was

properly or timely removed, it does not appear necessary to

resolve those issues in light of the Plaintiff's notice (document

no. 12) indicating her intent to file a Title VII claim

(presumably exhausted), over which this court will have federal

question jurisdiction, and indicating her lack of opposition to

the Defendant's objection to remand. The court will not order

remand, deeming all objections to removal to have been waived by

the Plaintiff.

Date: September 8, 2005

cc: H. Jonathan Meyer, Esq.

 Douglas A. Troyer, Esq.

 Thomas O. Moriarty, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00206-SM Document 13 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Puget
      Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the
      "Companies") on Form 10-Q for
      the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
      10-Q"), I, Bertrand
      A. Valdman, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
      Officer of the
      Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Form
      10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.











Date:
                November 2, 2006/s/Bertrand
                A. ValdmanBertrand
                A. ValdmanSenior
                Vice President Finance andChief
                Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

CARMEN C. LEE COCKLIN,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

STATE OF NEBRASKA, HUD, Housing 

Urban Development; SIENA FRANCIS 

HOUSE, Homeless Shelter; LYDIA 

HOUSE, Homeless Shelter; and 

SALVATION ARMY,

Defendants.

8:23CV203

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Carmen C. Lee Cocklin, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to 

Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Filing No. 2. Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court 

finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is 

granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised 

that the next step in her case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of her 

claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 19th day of May, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00203-JFB-PRSE Doc # 5 Filed: 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 55
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,133,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                 257,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,220,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,994,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    258,308
<COMMON>                                       139,429
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,181,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,220,913
<SALES>                                        309,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,704
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  172,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,113
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,304
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>
8:00-cr-00065-JFB   Doc # 73   Filed: 04/15/09   Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 68
#### THOMPSON v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1936.

George S. Okell, of Miami, for plaintiff in error.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error took writ of error to a judgment of conviction and sentence to imprisonment in the state penitentiary, upon an information charging that the accused did “unlawfully and feloniously break and enter” a “store building * * * with intent to commit a felony therein, to-wit Grand Larceny.”

“Where it is shown that a building has been entered and property stolen therefrom, and soon thereafter the property is found in the possession of the person charged with entering the building with intent to steal, such possession, unexplained, may warrant the jury to infer guilt of the crime of entering the building with intent to steal. The guilt of the accused does not follow as a presumption or conclusion of law from the unexplained possession of property recently stolen; but an inference of guilt as a matter of fact may be drawn therefrom ‘by the jury, to be considered by them in connection with the other evidence. * * *

“Where there is testimony from which the jury might legally have inferred all the essential elements of the crime charged, and it does not appear .that the jury were influenced by considerations other than the evidence, a verdict of guilty will not be disturbed.” Thompson v. State, 58 Fla. 106, 50 So. 507, 19 Ann.Cas. 116.

There is evidence legally sufficient to sustain the verdict, and there is nothing to indicate that the jury were not governed by the evidence adduced.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

BROWN, Justice

(concurring).

Plaintiff in error contends that this case should be reversed on authority of Kilkrease v. State, 96 Fla. 264, 117 So. 862, but the evidence here does not quite measure up to that in the Kilkrease Case, and would not authorize us in reversing the verdict and judgment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-203-01-PB

Daniel Childs

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the November 1, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

properly prepare for trial or other disposition. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, to allow the parties time to properly prepare

for trial, the court will continue the trial from November 1,

2005 to February 7, 2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the

court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the

above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00203-PB Document 9 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The October 27, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until January 17, 2006 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 24, 2005

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Robert Veiga, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00203-PB Document 9 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Lucien H. Groleau

v. Civil No. 04-cv-332-JD

American Express Financial

Advisors, Inc., et al.

PROCEDURAL ORDER

This case was removed to this court on September 1, 2004. 

On December 1, 2004, the court granted the parties’ joint motion

to stay proceedings here pending arbitration. A year later, the

court ordered the parties to file reports as to the status of

their arbitration. On January 4, 2006, the parties filed status

reports, and both sides represented that arbitration had not yet

been scheduled. Counsel for the plaintiff represented that he

was then seeking to schedule arbitration and represented “that

the matter might be scheduled and heard within the next three

months.” 

Four months have now passed without any indication from the

parties as to the status of arbitration in this case. Therefore,

the plaintiff shall show cause on or before May 25, 2006, why

this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 2, 2006

cc: Michael R. Callahan, Esquire

Lisa Snow Wade, Esquire

Case 1:04-cv-00332-JD Document 18 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin F. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Agilysys, Inc.
(the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies (1) with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 8, 2011



By:

/s/ Martin F. EllisMartin F. EllisPresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | As explained more fully in this Report, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 does not include, as required by the
Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, the separate financial statements of Magirus AG, a privately owned German Company in which the Company formerly held a 20% equity interest until the Company disposed of such interest on November 18, 2008.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dennis A. Smith

v. No. 05-fp-374

New Hampshire State Prison, Warden, et al.

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

This case has been assigned civil number 05-cv-374-JD. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: December 2, 2005

cc: Dennis A. Smith, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00374-JD Document 7 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

RULE 13A‐14(a) CERTIFICATION

OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Denise Lindsay, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Meridian Corporation, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10‐K of Meridian Corporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

|   |           |                                                                               |
|--------|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | April 10, 2020 | /s/ Denise Lindsay                                                       |
|   |           | Denise Lindsay                                                                |
|   |           | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |           | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 06/30/1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE 6-MONTHS ENDED 06/30/1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRITY BY REFERANCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,354
<SECURITIES>                                    16,852
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                       764
<INVENTORY>                                     13,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,389
<PP&E>                                          18,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,124
<BONDS>                                          1,459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,429
<SALES>                                         36,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,089
<CGS>                                           24,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,131
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of November 28, 2018 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2018-4 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of May, 2019.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
(logo)Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") datedas of October 1, 2018 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset ReceivingCorporation as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as MasterServicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association asCertificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge LenderServices, LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer relatingto the Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, DBGS 2018-C1Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C1 **(DBGS2018-Cl)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.     A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of October30, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.     To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all materialrespects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfillany such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature andstatus thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019