alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1166 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1166

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent appropriation 
  for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2001

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
 for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisidiction 
                       of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent appropriation 
  for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Pay For Performance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PERMANENT APPROPRIATION FOR MEMBERS' PAY.

    Subsection (c) of section 130 of the joint resolution entitled 
``Joint resolution making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 
1982, and for other purposes'' (Public Law 97-51; 2 U.S.C. 31 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(c) Effective'' and inserting ``(c)(1) 
        Except as provided in paragraph (2), effective''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) If Congress has not passed all general appropriation bills 
before the beginning of a fiscal year, then the appropriation contained 
in paragraph (1) shall not be effective with respect to such fiscal 
year.''.

SEC. 3. CONSIDERATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH APPROPRIATION.

    It shall not be in order in either the House of Representatives or 
the Senate to consider the general appropriation bill making 
appropriations for the legislative branch for any fiscal year unless 
and until all other general appropriation bills for such fiscal year 
have been presented to the President for signature under section 7 of 
article I of the Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 82

Recognizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 2002

Mr. COX (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. SHADEGG,

Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. VITTER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland,

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. PENCE, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.

OTTER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. KELLER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

TANCREDO, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. SKEEN, Mr.

TIAHRT, Mr. CRANE, Mr. DELAY, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr.

BUYER, Ms. HART, Mr. AKIN, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. GREEN of

Wisconsin, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. SAXTON, Mr.

BROWN of South Carolina, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. JEFF MILLER

of Florida, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BOOZMAN,

Mr. ISSA, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. KING, Mr. TIBERI, Mr.

CULBERSON, Mr. KERNS, Mr. CAMP, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr.

SWEENEY, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. FARR of California,

Mr. THOMAS, Mrs. BIGGERT, and Mr. ROYCE) introduced the following

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan.

Whereas February 6, 2002, is the 91st birthday of Ronald

Wilson Reagan;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is the first former President ever to

attain the age of 91;
2

HJ 82 IH

Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan

have distinguished records of public service to the United

States, the American people, and the international community;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming

margins as President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore

‘‘the great, confident roar of American progress, growth,

and optimism’’ and ensure renewed economic prosperity;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s leadership was instrumental in extending freedom and democracy around the globe and

uniting a world divided by the Cold War;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of

Americans, and by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s eloquence united Americans in

times of triumph and tragedy;

Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First

Lady but also led a national crusade against illegal drug

use;

Whereas, together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their

lives to promoting national pride and to bettering the

quality of life in the United States and throughout the

world; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the

country are with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle

with Alzheimer’s disease: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress, on behalf of the American people, ex-
3

HJ 82 IH

1 tends its birthday greetings and best wishes to Ronald

2 Reagan on his 91st birthday.

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 106

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an additional place

of holding court in the District of Colorado.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an

additional place of holding court in the District of Colorado.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN

4 THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.

5 Section 85 of title 28, United States Code, is amend6 ed by inserting ‘‘Colorado Springs,’’ after ‘‘Boulder,’’.

Æ
#### ELDER v. LILLY.

No. 2385.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 1, 1942.

John R. Land, Jr., of Shreveport, and Drew L. Smith, of New Orleans for appellant.

Haas & Haas, of Opelousas, for appel-lee.

DORE, Judge.

This is a suit to recover the sum of $1,941.64 due plaintiff for materials, supplies and oil well equipment furnished defendant, and for $10 for recording the ma-terialmen’s lien.

It is shown by the record that a default was duly entered by plaintiff and that this default was confirmed and a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff on May 2, 1941. Thereafter, on' May 30, 1941, the defendant petitioned for and obtained an order of appeal and executed a bond for a dev-olutive appeal to this court. The plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on two principal grounds: (1) that the appeal bond was filed on May 30th, and the order and citation of appeal were issued on that day, a legal holiday, and are therefore null and void; (2) that the defendant acquiesced in the judgment on the day following the issuance of the order of appeal.

It does not appear necessary to discuss or pass upon plaintiff’s motion, for the reason that the case can be readily and correctly decided on the merits. The judgment recites that the plaintiff made proof of his demands and there is nothing in the record to show that this proof was insufficient. Furthermore, this case was twice *336set for hearing- before our court, and the defendant has failed to appear on either occasion and has failed to point out, either orally or by brief, any manifest error in the judgment rendered. Under the circumstances, we must assume that the trial judge had ample proof before him to support the judgment, and it is therefore affirmed.

LE BLANC and OTT, JJ., concur.
Case 1:05-cv-00328-PB   Document 3   Filed 09/27/05   Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-mj-047-JM

Holland Smith

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. On two instances defendant tested positive for

cocaine use and thus he violated condition #1. He failed to

report as directed on seven instances, including one instance

where he was to be tested. See conditions # 6(a), 6(g) and 6(p). 

Given the number of failed opportunities to comply with

conditions I find that the defendant is unlikely to abide by any

condition or combination of conditions. The conditions of

release are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

Case 1:05-mj-00047-JM Document 11 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 2
2

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 9, 2005 

cc: Donald A. Feith, Esq.

 Bjorn Lange, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-mj-00047-JM Document 11 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10(d)

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                            QUAKER STATE CORPORATION
                 1994 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN

         This First Amendment is made effective the 24th day of October, 1996
by Quaker State Corporation (the "Corporation")

                                  WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Corporation established the Quaker State Corporation 1994
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan on May 12, 1994 (the "Plan"); and

      WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended in accordance with SECTION 8 thereof; and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation wishes to amend the Plan as a result of
changes in the requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended;

         NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers retained by the Corporation's
Board of Directors under SECTION 8 of the Plan and pursuant to the
authorization of the Board of Directors granted on October 24, 1996, the
Corporation hereby amends the Plan as follows :

1.       Section 4, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK OPTIONS, is hereby amended by
deleting the last sentence under sub- section D.

2.       In all other respects, the provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified
and confirmed, and shall continue in full force and effect.  In order to
continue to set forth all provisions of the Plan in a single document, the
changes made by this First Amendment may be incorporated into a restatement of
the Plan.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has evidenced the adoption of this
First Amendment to the Plan by the signature of its duly authorized officer.




                                        QUAKER STATE CORPORATION
                                        
Attest:                                 
                                        By:  /s/ Paul E. Konney             
                                             ------------------             
  /s/ Carrie L. Sherwood                     Paul E. Konney
  --------------------------                 Senior Vice President, General
  Assistant Secretary                        Counsel and Secretary
                                        
                                        
         (SEAL)
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 43

Expressing Congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the Department

of Energy with respect to residential central air conditioners and heat pumps.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

JOINT RESOLUTION

Expressing Congressional disapproval of a rule issued by

the Department of Energy with respect to residential

central air conditioners and heat pumps.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Sec4 retary of Energy relating to residential central air condi5 tioners and heat pumps (66 Fed. Reg. 7170; January 22,

6 2001), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 25, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 25, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0115. STUBBS OIL COMPANY v. GLORIA JEAN et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16CV65969
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 

**- 1153** 

CHANTALE TETA MAFFO

,

Petitioner

,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted : September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbel t, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Julia J. Tyler, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Chantale Teta Maffo, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as untimely and

numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record

an d Maffo’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse

its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)

(201 6 ); Mosere v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).

We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons

stated by the Board. See In re Maffo (B.I.A. Jan. 19, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### S. E. CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. Louis Glenn CARSTENSON, a minor by his father and next friend, Louis Carstensen, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

June 15, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
September 19, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the Agreement)
during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 05-cv-178-JD

Land and Buildings Located

at 4 Meetinghouse Terrace,

Bedford, New Hampshire, et al.

SEALED ORDER

Claimant Edward D. Berthiaume moves for appointment of

counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(b) and supports his motion

with a financial declaration. Berthiaume is incarcerated pending

criminal proceedings in state court. His financial affidavit

establishes that he has no income and few, if any, assets. 

Berthiaume also represents that the property that is subject to

forfeiture in this action, 551 Silver Street, Manchester, New

Hampshire, is his primary residence. The government has not

filed a response to Berthiaume’s motion for appointment of

counsel.

Based on his financial declaration and his representation

that the property at 551 Silver Street is his primary residence,

Berthiaume is entitled to be represented by counsel from the

Legal Services Corporation. § 983(b)(2)(A).

Case 1:05-cv-00178-JD Document 113 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the claimant’s motion for

appointment of counsel (document no. 102) is granted. The clerk

of court shall contact the Legal Services Corporation and arrange

for counsel to represent Edward D. Berthiaume in this proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

October 19, 2006

cc: Peter D. Anderson, Esquire

R. Matthew Cairns, Esquire

George T. Campbell, III, Esquire

William E. Christie, Esquire

Michael J. Iacopino, Esquire

Victor Manougian, Esquire

Douglas J. Miller, Esquire

Donald J. Perrault, Esquire

Robert J. Rabuck, Esquire

Edward D. Barthiaume

Case 1:05-cv-00178-JD Document 113 Filed 10/19/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.b  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Larry Bruce, certify that: (1)I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of DataJungle Software Inc.;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods represented in this report;  (4)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.   /s/ Larry Bruce Larry Bruce Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer Date: May 15, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. No. 05-cr-112-01/02-JD

Carlos Soto-Garcia

Luis Ortiz-Lara

PROCEDURAL ORDER

Based on the oral motions of counsel for the defendants at a

hearing on the pending motions, the court granted a continuance

of the trial in the interests of justice. The case is

rescheduled for trial on November 13, 2006.

Defendant Carlos Soto-Garcia’s motions to exclude evidence

(document nos. 47, 48, 49, 53) were denied, and counsel was given

the opportunity to request a continuance in order to review the

information recently made available to him. The government was

directed to adhere to the requirements of Local Rules 16.1(c),

(e), (f), and 16.2. 

The court recognizes that Defendant Soto-Garcia filed a

notice of public-authority defense under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.3(a)

on February 27, 2006 (document no. 24). If Defendant Luis OrtizLara intends to assert a public-authority defense, he shall file

an independent notice pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.3(a) by

October 18, 2006. 

Case 1:05-cr-00112-JL Document 65 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The government shall comply with the provisions of Fed. R.

Crim. P. 12.3(a)(3) by responding to the defendants’ respective

notices by October 19, 2006.

The defendants and the government shall thereafter comply

with the disclosure provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.3(a)(4).

The government shall respond to Defendant Ortiz-Lara’s

motion to dismiss (document no. 60) by October 23, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

October 17, 2006

cc: Robert B. Carmel-Montes, Esquire

Donald A. Feith, Esquire

Timothy M. Harrington, Esquire

Michael J. Sheehan, Esquire

Case 1:05-cr-00112-JL Document 65 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2