alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth **Court of Appeals** 

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 29, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00716

- CV

Samuel R. BUILTA a/k/a Sam Builta, Individually and d/b/a Technical Services System

, Appellant s

v.

PARAGON, INC., Appelle e

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 393227 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant was initially represented by retained counsel. On April 5, 2018, this court received notice from the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas that Appellant’s counsel has been suspended from the practice of law effective March 21, 2018. Appellant advised this court he had obt ained replacement counsel, but n o notice of appearance of

new counsel to represent Appellant has been filed.

Appellant’s brief was due on June 22, 2018. To date, no motion for extension of time to file the brief or appellant’s brief has been filed.

We ORDER Appellant Samuel R. Builta , pro se, to show cause in writing within TEN

DAYS of the date of this order why this cause should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio , 975 S .W.2d 61, 63 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, no pet.) . Appellant’s written response must include a reasonable explanation for Appellant’s failure to timely file the brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a).

If Appellant fail s to show cause as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed without

further notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Elizondo , 975 S.W.2d at 63

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 14

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

regulations on the amounts of expenditures of personal funds made

by candidates for election for public office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 2001

Mr. LEACH introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding regulations on the amounts of expenditures of personal funds made by candidates for election

for public office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 14 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress and the several States may

5 enact laws regulating the amounts of expenditures a can6 didate for elective public office may make from personal

7 funds of the candidate or members of the candidate’s im8 mediate family, including personal loans.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

Antonio King,

Plaintiff,

v . Civil No. 04-CV-356-JD

Cesar Rivas et al.,

Defendants .

Order to Transport Angel Correa

It is hereby ordered that the NH Department of Corrections shall transport witness Angel

Correa (NHSP #33990) from the New Hampshire State Prison in Concord to the United States

Courthouse on January 23, 2006, to arrive no later than 9 :30 a.m., until the end of proceedings

that day.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00356-SM Document 42 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PROVIDENCE JOURNAL COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,350
<SECURITIES>                                     3,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,468
<PP&E>                                         178,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 733,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        47,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     314,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   733,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,226)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,371)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

NORREL SUTHERLAND and NADINA SUTHERLAND

, Appellant s ,

v.

BRIAN ALLISON, DEPUTY PEREZ and RIC L. BRADSHAW, in his official capacity as SHERIFF OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 13

- 1573

[ September 17, 2014 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502009CA017039XX

.

G. William Allen, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Harr iet R. Lewis and Gary Oldehoff of Lewis, Stroud & Deutsch, P.L.

, Boca Raton, for appellee Ric L. Bradshaw.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Am a dor v. F la. Bd. of Regents ex rel. Fla. Int’l Univ.

, 830 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

W ARNER , C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard Ponto n

v . No. 06-fp-025

U .S . Social Security Administration, Commissione r

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI S

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-025-SM .

SO ORDERED .

Date : January 24, 2006

d States Magistrate Judg e

cc : Raymond J. Kelly, Esq .

Case 1:06-cv-00025-SM Document 3 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:04-cr-00208-SM Document 20 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cr-00208-SM Document 20 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 53883)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council, September 18, 2008, 8:30 a.m. to September 19, 2008, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Conference Rooms E1 & E2, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 21, 2008, 73 FR 49468-49469.                

The meeting will be open to the public on September 19, 2008 from 8:30 a.m. to adjournment. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: September 9, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-21524 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40969 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SERGIO RAMIREZ

- GANDARILLA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 214

- 1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sergio Ramirez

- Gandar i l la pleaded guilty to being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation , having been previously convicted of a felony. Relevant to the appeal, the district court assessed a 12

- level “drug trafficking offense” enhancement, pursuant to § 2L 1.2(b)(1)(B), based on
Ramirez

- Gandarilla’s 1989 federal conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 15, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40969 Document: 00513116143 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2015No. 14

- 40969

2 For the first time on appeal, Ramirez

- Gandarilla argues that the district court plainly erred by applying the 12

- level drug trafficki ng enhancement under § 2L1.2 because his 1989 federal conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana could have been committed without evidence of remuneration or commercial activity. This court recently held that an enhancement under § 2L1 .2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior drug trafficking offense , as that term is defined by the Sentencing Commission in § 2L1.2, comment. (n.1(B)(iv)), is warranted regardless of whether the conviction for the prior offense required proof of remuneration or commercia l activity. United States v. Martinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d 198, 204

- 05 (5th Cir. 2015). Additionally, in United States v. Rodriguez

- Escareno , 700 F.3d 751, 754 (5th Cir. 2012), this court specifically stated that “21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) is a federal drug traffi cking offense as defined in Application Note 1” of § 2L1.2. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-40969 Document: 00513116143 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Federal Trade Commission

v. Civil No. 04-cv-377-JD

Seismic Entertainment

Productions, Inc., et al.

O R D E R

Re: Document No. 58, Motion to Extend Time Allowed for

Filing Summary Judgment Motions

Ruling:

Granted. 

The court takes a very dim view of conduct that

necessitates the extension of deadlines set by the court

because a party has failed to comply with court orders

relating to discovery. This issue will be addressed by

the court when it considers the FTC’s motion for

sanctions. In the interim, SmartBot and Wallace would be

well advised to produce the requested discovery before

the court acts on the pending sanctions motion.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

U.S. District Judge

Date: June 27, 2005

cc: Ralph A. Jacobs, Esquire

W. Scott O’Connell, Esquire

Charulata B. Pager, Esquire

Laura M. Sullivan, Esquire

Martha Van Oot, Esquire

Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 65 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6709
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALDO TYNELL LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Tynell, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-98-150) Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lightfoot , No. CR-98-150 (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota, sitting by designation. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1851

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff–Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Damion M. Wilson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant–Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 10, 2008

Filed: March 19, 2009

___________

Before MELLOY and BENTON, Circuit Judges, and DOTY1

, District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Damion M. Wilson pleaded guilty to a single count of distribution of five grams

or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). In the conditional plea agreement, Wilson
2

The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Lewis M. Blanton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

reserved his right to appeal the district court’s2

 adverse disposition of his pre-trial

motions to dismiss the indictment and suppress evidence. 

Wilson’s primary argument was that there was a material defect in his federal

prosecution because federal authorities had violated the Attorney General’s Guidelines

Regarding the Use of Confidential Informants (“CI Guidelines”), which were

promulgated pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§§ 509, 510, 533. He argued that such a defect

warranted dismissal of the indictment because it resulted in an arbitrary and capricious

prosecution in violation of his due-process rights. Similarly, Wilson argued that the

use of certain evidence in the case violated his Fourth Amendment and due-process

rights because it was obtained as a direct result of the CI Guidelines violation.

After review of the overall record, the district court’s opinion, and the briefs

filed on appeal in this court, we affirm the judgment based upon the well-reasoned

opinion of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
### Slip Op. 04- 110

UNITED ST ATES COURT OF INTE RNATIONAL T RADE

____________________________________ : DAIML ERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, : :

Plaintiff, :

: v. : Court No. 99-03-00178 : UNI TED STATE S, : : Defend ant. : ____________________________________: [Judgment for plaintiff following appeal.] Dated: August 26, 2004 Barnes, Richardson & Colburn ( Lawrence

M. Friedman

and Harvey

Karlovac ) , for plaintiff. Peter D. Keisler , Assistant Attorney Gene ral, David M. Cohen , Director, Jeanne E. Davidson , Deputy Direc

tor, Barba ra S. Willia

ms , Attorne

y- in-Charge, I

nternat ional Tra de Field Office, Commercial Litig ation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice ( Saul Davis and Aimee Lee ), Karen P. Binder , Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Bureau of Customs a

nd Borde r Protection, of c ounsel, f or defe ndant. JUDGMENT RESTANI, Chief Judge: In accorda

nce with the mandate of the Court of Appeals for the F ederal Circuit issued on August 2, 2004 and as requested by the parties, judgment following appeal shall now ente r for plaintiff as follow s: IT I S HEREBY ORDERED that 1. The Unite d States B ureau of Customs and

Border Protection shallCourt No. 99-03-00178 Page 2 reliquidate the entries of DaimlerChrysler Model Year 1993 and 1994 trucks at issue here to afford duty -free treatment under HTSUS subheading 9802.00.8 0 to the Un

ited State s product

sheet metal components of the trucks sent to Mexico for assembly into the truc ks as entered. 2. Interest and costs are awarded as provided by

law.

/s/ Jane A. Re stani Jane A. Restani Chief Judge Dated: New York, New York. This 26 day of Aug

ust, 2004.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al

v. Civil No. 05-cv-289-SM

Charles Winning

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated March 9, 2006, no objection having been filed. Judgment shall

be entered in the amount of $10,778.60. In addition, the permanent injunction

recommended by the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted in the form proposed and

is issued as an order of this court.

SO ORDERED.

April 7, 2006 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Christopher Cole, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00289-SM Document 11 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00289-SM Document 11 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00122

- CV

IN RE CAROLYN BARNES

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Carolyn Barnes’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed April 19, 2017

[OT 06 ]
#### In re Hannah.

(No. 24422

Decided December 20, 1933.)

*Mr. William J. Meyer*and *Mr. Edgar G. Millar,*for petitioners.

*Mr. O. E. Irish*and *Mr. Charles Hannah,*for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition, supplemental petition, response, reply and the evidence, and was argued by counsel for the petitioners, the respondent not appearing in person or by counsel. On consideration whereof the court finds upon the issues joined in favor of the petitioners and it is therefore ordered and adjudged by' the court that the certificate of admission to the bar of Ohio, heretofore issued by this court to said Charles W. Gr. Hannah, be, and the same hereby is, revoked and cancelled, his *591name be stricken from the roll of attorneys, the record of his admission be expunged and respondent be., barred from admission to the bar of Ohio; it- is further ordered that said Charles W. G. Hannah forthwith return to this court his certificate of admission to practice law in the state of Ohio, and that upon failure to return said certificate the said Charles. W. G. Hannah stand committed in contempt therefor.

*Judgment for petitioners.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Cr. No. 05- 01-

DONALD MCMULLIN

INDICTMENT

Count One

(18 U.S.C. ' 922 (g)(3): Unlawful User in Possession of a Firearm)

On or about the 19th day of November, 2004, in the District

of New Hampshire, the defendant, 

DONALD MCMULLIN

having been an unlawful user of marihuana, a controlled substance, did knowingly and

intentionally possess the following firearms: 1)an Erma, .22 caliber pistol, importer Excam,

Hialeah, Fl., country Germany, serial number J21056; 2) a Winchester, model 1200, 12 gauge

shotgun, serial number L1903550; 3) SWD, model M11/9, 9 mm pistol, serial number 86-

0002180; 4) Llama (Gabilondo & CIA), .45 caliber pistol, importer Stoeger Industries Inc., serial

number A12770; 5) a Llama (Gabilondo & CIA), model especial, .380 caliber pistol, importer

Stoeger Industries Inc., serial number 537432; 6) a Jennings, model J22, .22 caliber pistol, serial

number 247607, and 7) a Benelli Arm, model B76, 9 mm pistol, serial number 001755, all of

which had been shipped or transported in interstate commerce or foreign commerce, in violation

of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(3).
Dated A TRUE BILL

/s/ Foreperson 

Foreperson of the Grand Jury

THOMAS COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

District of New Hampshire

/s/ Debra M. Walsh__________________

By: Debra M. Walsh

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney