UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Commodity Futures Trading

Commission, et al.

v. Civil No. 05-cv-210-JD

Cromwell Financial Services,

Inc., et al.

EX PARTE STATUTORY RESTRAINING ORDER CONCERNING

DOCUMENTS AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

The plaintiffs, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

(“Commission”) and the New Hampshire Secretary of State, Bureau

of Securities Regulation, have filed a complaint for permanent

injunction and other relief, and moved ex parte pursuant to

Section 6c of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “Act”),

7 U.S.C. § 13a-1 (2002), for a statutory restraining order

prohibiting the defendants from, among other things, destroying,

altering or disposing of, or refusing to permit authorized

representatives of the Commission to inspect and copy, when and

as requested, any books, records, electronically stored data,

including computers and computer data, or other documents

wherever they may be. Additionally, the Commission seeks leave

to conduct expedited discovery.

The court has considered the pleadings, declarations,

exhibits and memorandum filed in support of the plaintiff’s

motion. Based on the record provided by the plaintiffs, it

Case 1:05-cv-00210-JD Document 5 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 1 of 6

US Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Cromwell Financial Services, Inc. et al Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
2

appears that:

(1) this court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of

this case, and Section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1 authorizes

ex parte relief;

(2) there is good cause to believe that the defendants have

engaged in, are engaging in, or are about to engage in violations

of the Act;

(3) this is a proper case for granting an ex parte statutory

restraining order to preserve the status quo, protect public

customers from loss and damage, and enable the Commission to

fulfill its statutory duties, therefore the court orders as

follows:

DEFINITIONS

For the purpose of this order, the following definitions

apply:

(1) The term “document” is synonymous in meaning and equal

in scope to the usage of the term in Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 34(a), and includes, but is not limited to, writings,

drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, audio and video

recordings, computer records (including, but not limited to

floppy diskettes, hard disks, ZIP disks, CD-ROMs, optical discs,

backup tapes, printer buffers, smart cards, memory calculators,

pagers, personal digital assistants such as Palm Pilot computers,

Case 1:05-cv-00210-JD Document 5 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 2 of 6
3

as well as printouts or readouts from any magnetic storage

device), and other data compilations from which information can

be obtained and translated, if necessary, through detection

devices into reasonably usable form. A draft or non-identical

copy is a separate document within the meaning of the term.

(2) “Defendants” means Cromwell Financial Services, Inc.,

Philip Tuccelli, Michael Staryk, Dennis Gee, Richard Peluchette,

and Richard Astern, and any person insofar as he or she is acting

in the capacity of their officer, agent, servant, employee or

attorney, and any person who receives actual notice of this order

by personal service or otherwise insofar as he or she is acting

in concert or participating with them. 

RELIEF GRANTED

I. MAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTS

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants and all persons or

entities who receive notice of this order by personal service or

otherwise, are restrained and enjoined from directly or

indirectly destroying, mutilating, erasing, altering, concealing,

or disposing of, in any manner, directly or indirectly, any

books, records, or documents in the possession or control of the

defendants, their agents, attorneys, partners, servants,

representatives, employees, attorneys, any person(s) acting or

Case 1:05-cv-00210-JD Document 5 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 3 of 6
4

purporting to act for or on their behalf, and/or acting for or on

behalf of any corporation, partnership or any other type of

entity in which defendants have an interest.

II. INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that representatives of the plaintiffs

be immediately allowed to inspect the books, records, and other

documents of the defendants, their agents, attorneys, partners,

servants, representatives, employees, any person(s) acting or

purporting to act for or on their behalf, and/or any corporate,

partnership or any other entity in which the defendants have an

interest, wherever situated, including, but not limited to, paper

documents, electronically stored data, tape recordings, and

computer discs, wherever they may be situated, whether they are

in the possession or control of the defendants, or the possession

or control of others, and to copy said documents, data and

records, either on or off the premises.

III. EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are granted leave, at

any time after service of this order, to take the deposition of

and demand the production of documents from any person or entity

for the purpose of discovering the nature and/or location of

documents reflecting the business transactions of the defendants;

Case 1:05-cv-00210-JD Document 5 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 4 of 6
5

forty-eight(48) hours notice shall be deemed sufficient for any

such deposition and five (5) days notice shall be deemed

sufficient for the production of any such documents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the limitations and conditions

set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B)

regarding subsequent depositions of an individual shall not apply

to depositions taken pursuant to this order. No depositions

taken pursuant to this order shall count towards the ten

deposition imit set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

30(a)(2)(A).

IV. SERVICE OF ORDER

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this order may be

served by any means, including facsimile transmission, upon any

entity or person that may have possession, custody, or control of

any documents of the defendants or that may be subject to any

provision of this order, and additionally, that representatives

of the plaintiffs are specially appointed by the court to effect

service. Service of the summons, complaint, or other process may

be effected in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

V. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the defendants shall

appear before this court on the 23d day of June, 2005, at 9:00

Case 1:05-cv-00210-JD Document 5 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 5 of 6
6

a.m. before Magistrate Judge James Muirhead at the United States

Courthouse for the District of New Hampshire in Concord, New

Hampshire, to show cause why this court should not enter a

preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from further

violations of the Act, and ordering any additional relief this

court deems appropriate. Should any party wish to file a

memorandum of law or other papers concerning the issuance of a

preliminary injunction against the defendants, such materials

shall be filed, served, and received by the parties on or before

4:00 p.m. on June 20, 2005.

VI. FORCE AND EFFECT

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall remain in full

force and effect until further order of this court, and that this

court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for all purposes.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

June 13, 2005

cc: Joseph A. Konizeski, Esquire

Melanie M. Bell-Harrington, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00210-JD Document 5 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 6 of 6