alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Velcro Industries B.V. and 

Velcro USA Inc. 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BRM ENTERPRISES d/b/a 

POLITESOCIETY.COM 

 Defendant 

Case No.: 1:05-cv-301 

RULE 41(a)(1)(i) NOTICE OF DISMISSALWITHOUT PREJUDICE

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), plaintiffs hereby give notice that 

they dismiss this action without prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted, 

VELCRO INDUSTRIES B.V. AND 

VELCRO USA INC. 

By Their Attorneys, 

RANSMEIER & SPELLMAN 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

Dated: 10/25/05 By: /s/ R. Matthew Cairns 

 R. Matthew Cairns (NHBA #411) 

 One Capitol Street, 

 P.O. Box 600 

 Concord, NH 03302-0600 

 Tel. (603) 228-0477 

 matt@ranspell.com 

Case 1:05-cv-00301-PB Document 5 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-18-PB

Travis Blodgett and

Avery Blodgett

O R D E R

The defendants have moved to continue the December 5, 2006

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

complete pretrial matters and prepare a defense. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 5, 2006 to January 9, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00018-PB Document 71 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on December 

19, 2007 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 4, 2006

cc: Richard Foley, Esq.

Glenn Geiger, Esq.

Donald Feith, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00018-PB Document 71 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of deCODE genetics, Inc. (the “Registrant”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned , KariStefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,and Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | Dated: August 11,  2008 | /s/ Kari Stefansson            |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |                         | Kari Stefansson                |
|   |                         | Chairman, President and  Chief |
|   |                         | Executive Officer              |
|   |                         |                           |
|   |                         |                           |
|   | Dated: August 11,  2008 | /s/ Lance Thibault             |   |
|   |                         | Lance Thibault                 |
|   |                         | Chief Financial Officer  and   |
|   |                         | Treasurer                      |
|        |                              |                                |        |  |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











The Board of Directors


TCR 2 Therapeutics Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-229691) on Form S-8 of TCR 2 Therapeutics Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2019, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TCR 2 Therapeutics Inc. as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes, which report appears in the December 31, 2018 annual report on Form 10‐K of TCR 2 Therapeutics Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Cambridge, Massachusetts


March 29, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 126 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 126

      To limit further production of the Trident II (D-5) missile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Luther  (for himself and Mr. Ramstad) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To limit further production of the Trident II (D-5) missile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trident II (D-5) Missile Production 
Limitation Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCONTINUATION OF PRODUCTION OF NEW TRIDENT II (D-5) MISSILES.

    (a) Production Limitation.--Funds appropriated for the Department 
of Defense for fiscal years after fiscal year 2002 may not be obligated 
or expended to commence production of additional Trident II (D-5) 
missiles.
    (b) Authorized Scope of Trident II (D-5) Program.--Amounts 
appropriated for the Department of Defense may be expended for the 
Trident II (D-5) missile program only for the completion of production 
of those Trident II (D-5) missiles which were commenced with funds 
appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2003.
                                 <all>
```
181 La. 973

#### Joseph MITCHELL v. CONSERVATIVE HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION.

No. 33075.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 1935.

Rehearing Denied April 1, 1935.

Weiss, Yarrut & Stich, Delvaille H. Theard, Legier, McEnerny & Waguespack, Carroll, McCall & Plough, A. D. Danziger and P. H. Stern, J. 0. Dempsey, Jr., D. J. Murphy, Hyman Mithoff, J. Zach Spearing, and Scott E. Beer, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Arthur B. Leopold, of New Orleans, for . appellee.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

This is one of the cases mentioned in the opinion rendered today in the case of Camille V. Treigle v. Acme Homestead Association (La. Sup.) 160 So. 637.

For the reasons given in that case the judgment appealed from is annulled and reversed, and the demand of the plaintiff is rejected, and his suit dismissed at his cost.

ODOM, J., dissents.
#### The State, ex rel. Wetherald, *v.*Baker, Probate Judge.

(No. 24630

Decided March 7, 1934.)

*Messrs. Graham S Graham,*for relator.

*Mr. John C. Bassett,*for respondent.

*600This cause came on to he heard upon the pleadings, the evidence and the argument of counsel. Upon consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that a writ of prohibition be denied, and that the action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed at the costs of the relator upon authority of *Silliman*v. *Court of Common Pleas of Williams County,*126 Ohio St., 338.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Antonio King,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 04-cv-356-SM

Cesar Rivas, Theresa Pendleton,

and James O’Mara, Jr.,

Superintendent of the

Hillsborough County

Department of Corrections

O R D E R

A status conference was held on October 24, 2006. Michael

J. Sheehan, Esq., appeared on behalf of the plaintiff; John A.

Curran, Esq., and Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq., appeared on behalf

of defendants.

A retrial on damages will begin with jury draw on March 6,

2007.

The parties shall mediate this dispute in good faith, before

a mediator of their choosing, before the end of the calendar year

and shall report the success or failure of those efforts to the

deputy clerk before January 15, 2007.

On or before January 15, 2007, the parties shall file

memoranda addressing the proper scope of the retrial on damages,

that is, whether the punitive damages award is sufficiently

independent of the compensatory award, to remain intact or

Case 1:04-cv-00356-SM Document 93 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

whether punitive damages must also be retried along with the

compensatory damages issue.

The parties anticipate the retrial will require a maximum of

three trial days, including jury draw.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

October 24, 2006

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq.

John A. Curran, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00356-SM Document 93 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 21, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, October 21, 2008, at 9 a.m., Eastern Time via a telephone 
conference call. For more information or to confirm attendance, 
notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Audrey 
Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085. If you would like to have 
the TAP consider a written statement, please write Audrey Y. Jenkins, 
TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, 
or you can post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-20948 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
3:

|Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of
Potomac Electric Power Company
(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|I,  John M. Derrick, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Andrew W. Williams, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Potomac Electric Power Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Potomac Electric Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (i) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Potomac Electric Power Company.
|
Case 1:04-cv-00439-JD Document 38 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00439-JD Document 38 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00256-SM Document 15 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 3Case 1:05-cv-00256-SM Document 15 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 3Case 1:05-cv-00256-SM Document 15 Filed 05/11/06 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. CR. 05-156-01-SM

George Curran,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Curran’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document no. 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the month

of July 6, 2006. Defendant Curran shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than March 2, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:05-cr-00156-SM Document 15 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for June 28, 2006 at 

11:00 a.m. in Room 421. 

Jury selection will take place on July 6, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 22, 2006

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Debra M. Walsh, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00156-SM Document 15 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-63-01-PB

Nester Rivera

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the December 6, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

engage in plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from December 6, 2005 to March 7,

2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00063-PB Document 12 Filed 12/01/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on February

27, 2006 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 1, 2005

cc: Michael Sklar, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00063-PB Document 12 Filed 12/01/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WILLIAM T. RADER and DILLON M. 

SALVO,

Defendants.

8:23CR119

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

This matter is before the Court on the United States’ Motion for a Final Order of 

Forfeiture. Filing 112. Having reviewed the record in this case, the Court finds as follows:

1. On June 20, 2024, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture forfeiting 

Defendant, William T. Rader’s, interest in the property described in Attachment A. Filing 74.

2. On September 9, 2024, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 

forfeiting Defendant, Dillon M. Salvo’s, interest in the property described in Attachment A. 

Filing 110.

3. Five items listed in the two Preliminary Orders of Forfeiture have been 

administratively forfeited, to-wit: 4 suspected silencers and threaded caps, cup baffling, tube 

extensions, jig/template. 

4. Notice of Criminal Forfeiture was posted on an official internet government 

forfeiture site, www.forfeiture.gov, for at least thirty consecutive days, beginning on June 25, 

2024, as required by 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1) and Rule 32.2(b)(6)(C) of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. A Declaration of Publication was filed herein on September 10, 2024. 

Filing No. 111.

8:23-cr-00119-BCB-MDN Doc # 113 Filed: 09/26/24 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 353
5. The United States advises the Court that no party has filed a petition regarding the 

subject Property. From a review of the Court file, the Court finds that no person or entity has 

filed a petition.

6. The Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture should be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture, Filing 112, is granted; 

2. All right, title and interest in and to the property listed in Attachment A of the 

Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture which was seized from the Defendants on or about March 

19, 2023, held by any person or entity are forever barred and foreclosed; 

3. The property in Attachment A is forfeited to the Government; and 

4. The Government is directed to dispose of that currency in accordance with the 

law.

Dated this 26th day of September, 2024.

BY THE COURT:  

_________________________

Brian C. Buescher 

United States District Judge

8:23-cr-00119-BCB-MDN Doc # 113 Filed: 09/26/24 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 354
NUMBER 13-22-00198-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

MAGGIE K. SCALF, WILLIAM S. SCALF, II, 

STEPHANIE KRAUS, ROBERT J. KRAUS, 

DENNIS W. HERD, SAMUEL SCHILLER, 

DENICE YVONNE CULLUM, ALVIN ROGERS, 

AND JEFFREY ELDER, Appellants,

 v.

AZIA NOORANI, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 16th District Court

of Denton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
2

This matter is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss 

appeal.

1 Appellants’ request dismissal, and appellee will not be prevented from seeking 

relief to which they would otherwise be entitled. 

The Court, having considered appellants’ motion, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellants’ unopposed 

motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed 

against the appellants, as there is no clear agreement between the parties regarding 

costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax 

costs against the appellant.”). Because the appeal is dismissed at appellants’ request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained.

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

30th day of June, 2022. 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket 

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
Exhibit 31.1
Section 302 Certification

I, Maurice J. Hamilburg, President and Co- Chief Executive Officer of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plymouth
Rubber Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date: October 14, 2003                         /s/ Maurice J. Hamilburg
                                                   Maurice J. Hamilburg
                                        President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

John R. Crooker

Case NO. 1 :05-cv-00008-

Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)

NOW COME the parties, John R. Crooker, and Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and hereby

stipulate to the dismissal of the above-captioned action with preiudice, pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(a).

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Honorable Court:

Dismiss this action with preiudice ; and

Grant such further relief as is just and equitable.

Respectfully submitted

JOHN R. CROOKER

By his attorneys

Bouchard, Kleinman & Wright, P.

Dated: October 12 2007 :/s/ Shenanne R. Tucker

Shenanne R. Tucker (#15381)

and

Case 1:05-cv-00008-JD Document 67 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 2
ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.

By Its Attorneys

Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, P.

Dated: October 12 2007 By: Isl John-Mark Turner (#15610)

David W. McGrath, #9347

John-Mark Turner, #15610

1000 Elm Street, P. O. Box 3701

Manchester, NH 03105-3701

(603) 668-0300

dmcgrath~sheehan. com

jturner~sheehan. com

Case 1:05-cv-00008-JD Document 67 Filed 10/12/07 Page 2 of 2