alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.16

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION

STOCK GRANT PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

 

1.                                      Purpose of Plan

 

This plan shall be known as the “Alerus Financial Corporation Stock Grant Plan For Non-Employee Directors” (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to promote the interests of Alerus Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), by enhancing its ability to attract and retain the services of non-employee directors without cash outlay and by encouraging the accumulation of shares of the common stock, (the “Common Stock”) of the Company by such non-employee directors.

 

2.                                      Stock Subject to Plan

 

The stock to be subject to the Plan shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4 hereof, the maximum number of shares under this Plan shall be 60,000 shares.

 

3.                                      Stock Grants.

 

Effective at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held in 2009, each director who is not otherwise an employee of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company (an “Eligible Director”) shall automatically receive, on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company at which such Eligible Director is elected to serve on the Board of Directors and each annual meeting of stockholders of the Company thereafter a grant of 600 shares of Common Stock provided, however, that no Eligible Director shall be entitled to such shares until, or unless, the issuance thereof complies with applicable securities laws. Such shares shall be fully vested in the director as of the date of the annual meeting and a certificate representing such shares shall be issued and delivered to such director as soon as practicable thereafter.

 

4.                                      Dilution or Other Adjustments

 

If there shall be any change in the Common Stock through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend (of whatever amount), stock split or other change in the corporate structure, appropriate proportionate adjustments in the shares of Common Stock to be issued under the Plan shall be made. In the event of any such changes, adjustments shall include, where appropriate, changes in the aggregate number of shares subject to the Plan, and the number of shares issued annually under the Plan.

 

5.                                      Amendment or Discontinuance of Plan

 

The Plan may be terminated by the Board of Directors at any time.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,132
<INVENTORY>                                     10,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,290
<PP&E>                                         474,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                 266,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                    (248,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,688
<SALES>                                          8,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,185
<CGS>                                            5,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (12,632)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,425)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.44)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AMY JACOBY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 8:23CR126

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [82]. 

Counsel needs additional time to conduct plea negotiations. For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [82] is granted, as 

follows:

1. The jury trial now set for April 22, 2024, is continued to May 28, 2024.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising 

as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s 

date and May 28, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation 

of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a 

continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective 

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

DATED: April 2, 2024.

 BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00126-RFR-MDN Doc # 83 Filed: 04/02/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 136
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DAISY FRANCO,

Defendant.

8:23CR113

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE

PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINE [38]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should 

be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 14-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be 

filed by June 27, 2023. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTION 

DEADLINE [38] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 27, 2023.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the 

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between June 13, 2023, and June 27, 2023, shall be 

deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial 

Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, 

taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. 

The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Dated this 14th day of June, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00113-RFR-MDN Doc # 40 Filed: 06/14/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 61
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
     2006-ASL1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC as Servicer.

     Dated: May 27, 2008


     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 46

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to incarceration for minor traffic offenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 2001

Ms. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to incarceration for minor traffic offenses.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 46 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The eighth article of amendment to the

3 Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor

5 excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punish6 ments (including incarceration, before or after trial, for

7 minor traffic offenses) inflicted.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.2


 


Summary of Long-Term Incentive Plan


 


In fiscal 2003, the Board of Directors of Angeion Corporation adopted
the Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
The Plan provides for the payment of cash compensation to eligible
employees, including the Company’s executive officers, upon achievement of
predetermined targets.  Bonuses will be
paid if the Company achieves specified levels of earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization for the three-year period ending October
31, 2005.  The Plan is incremental to any
bonuses that may be earned under the 2005 Management Incentive Bonus Plan.


 


Under the Plan, Mr. Rodney A. Young, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, is eligible to participate in the third year of the Plan.  Therefore, Mr. Young is eligible for a bonus
ranging from 35.0% to 130.0% of base salary, on a one-third prorated
basis.  Mr. Richard E Jahnke, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer until he retired on October 31, 2004, is eligible to
participate in the first two years of the Plan. 
Mr. Jahnke is eligible for a bonus ranging from 35.0% to 130.0% of base
salary, on a two-thirds prorated basis. 
The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Dale H. Johnson, is eligible for
a bonus ranging from 15.0% to 55.7% of base salary.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.11  


 
 

PROMISSORY NOTE    
    



	$200,000.00	 	March 2, 2005
	 	 	Denver, Colorado





        For
value received, VITACUBE SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., a Nevada corporation ("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of TIMOTHY J. BRASEL ("Holder"), at 5770 S. Beech Court,
Greenwood Village, CO 80121, or at such other address as may be designated in writing from time to time by the Holder of this Note, the principal sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00), or
if less, the principal amount of the Advances made by Holder together with interest at the rate of 10% per annum payable on May 30, 2005, or closing of the Public Offering which ever occurs
first. "Public Offering" means the public offering of the Maker's securities which is described in the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration
No. 333-121063) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2004, as amended. 


        Holder
agrees to advance funds (the "Advances") to the Maker on an as needed basis as requested by the Maker up to the maximum principal amount of this Note. 


        At
the option of the Holder of this Note, the repayment of all principal and interest due in accordance with the terms of this Note will be accelerated, and such principal
immediately shall be due and payable, without notice or demand, upon the occurrence of any of the following events of default: 



	(a)
	Dissolution,
termination of existence, insolvency, or business failure of the Maker;



	(b)
	Attachment,
garnishment or appointment of a receiver of any material part of the property of the Maker; and



	(c)
	Assignment
for the benefit of creditors by, or the commencement of any proceedings under, any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against the Maker. 




        Upon
default, the indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The Holder shall be entitled to collect all costs and expenses of
collection and/or suit, including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees. 


        This
Note may be prepaid at any time and from time to time in any amount or amounts, without penalty or additional interest charges. 


        Presentment
for payment, notice of dishonor, and protest are hereby waived by the Maker. 


        This
Note is executed in the City and County of Denver, Colorado, and is to be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of Colorado. The courts located in the City and County
of Denver, State of Colorado, shall have subject matter and personal jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Note, and venue for any proceeding to enforce the terms of this Note shall be
proper in the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado. 



	

 	
 	
VITACUBE SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
	
 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  EARNEST MATHIS, JR.      
 Earnest Mathis, Jr. Chief Executive Officer













QuickLinks


PROMISSORY NOTE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GERARDO SOTO-SIGALA,

Defendant.

8:23MJ279

ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE

DUE PROCESS PROTECTION ACT

This matter came before the Court for Initial Appearance on a Complaint. The government 

was represented by Mikala Purdy-Steenholdt. The defendant was present and represented by

Richard H. McWilliams. 

IT IS ORDERED:

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' 

obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence as required by Brady v. Maryland, 

373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders the United States to do so. Failure to disclose

exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited 

to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, 

or sanctions by the Court.

DATED: May 12, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-mj-00279-MDN Doc # 19 Filed: 05/12/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-CR-18-02-PB

Avery Blodgett 

O R D E R

The court finds reasonable cause to believe that the

defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease that

could affect his sentence, and with the consent of the parties,

the court commits the defendant to the custody of the Bureau of

Prisons for a period not to exceed 45 days to be placed at the

correctional facility at Ft. Devens, Massachusetts and examined

by a qualified psychiatrist. Following such examination, the

psychiatrist shall prepare a report to be filed under seal

addressing the defendant’s competency. This report shall also

take into account any medications the defendant is currently

taking.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 22, 2006

cc: Glenn Geiger, Jr., Esq.

Donald Feith, AUSA

Richard Foley, Esq.

United States Probation

United Sates Marshal 

Case 1:06-cr-00018-PB Document 77 Filed 12/22/06 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
DA 23

- 0215

_________________ PATRICIA TALFELSKI, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v. MARK JOHNSON, TAMMI FISHER,

Plaintiffs, Objectors , and Appellants,

v. LOGAN HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant s, through counsel, have filed a motion to file a “consolidated” reply brief and to extend the filing deadline to November 1, 2023. Counsel states that in the interest of judicial economy Appellants should be permitted to file one “consolidated” reply brief rather than separate briefs ad dressing each of Appellees’ briefs. Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 12(3), “Only one reply brief may be filed, regardless of the number of appellees’ briefs filed . . . .” IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant s motion for extension is GRANTED and Appellants sh all ha ve until November 1 , 2023, to file their reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2023

09/08/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0215
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6130

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , k Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOSEPH MCKINSEY BROWN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00458

- ELH

- 1 )

Submitted : June 29, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON , and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Joseph McKinsey Brown , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph McKinsey Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order di smissing without prejudice his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3852(c)(1)(A). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). “[D]ismissals without prejudice generally are not appealable ‘unless the grounds for dismissal clearly indicate
that no amendment .

. . could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Bing v . Brivo Sys.,
LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610 (4th Cir. 2020) (quoting Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Loc. Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993)), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).
B y denying Brown’s motion without prejudice for lack of evidence r egarding the severity
of Brown’s asthma, the district court indicated that additional facts could be added to Brown’s motion, and the language the district court used in denying the motion did not
indicate that it “was finished with the case.” Id. at 612. Furthermore, Brown’s appeal does
not indicate his intent to stand on his initial motion. See id . We therefore conclude that the district court’s order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory o rder. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMIS SED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

AVA SOLOMON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE IDEMNITY 

POLICY 000000886169059, ALLSTATE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and ETHAN 

CHAVEZ,

Defendants.

8:23CV207

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on what appears to be two identical motions titled 

“ex parte motion for Quo Status of Case” filed by Plaintiff on forms for the District Court 

of Clark County, Nevada (the “Motions”), Filing No. 41 and Filing No. 42, docketed as 

“amended motion to restrict” and “unopposed motion for summary judgment” respectively. 

The Court construes the Motions as motions for status, grants the Motions, and provides 

the following information regarding Plaintiff’s case.

Defendant Allstate Insurance Company filed a motion to dismiss and a brief in 

support on October 19, 2023. Filing No. 43, Filing No. 44. Pursuant to Local Rule 

7.1(b)(1)(B), Plaintiff has 21 days to file a brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss. If 

Plaintiff requires additional time to respond she must file a motion requesting additional 

time before the time to file her brief in opposition has expired.

8:23-cv-00207-JFB-PRSE Doc # 45 Filed: 10/20/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 214
2

Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motions for status, Filing No. 41 and Filing No. 42 are granted 

consistent with this Memorandum and Order.

2. Plaintiff has through and until November 9, 2023, to file a brief in opposition 

to the motion to dismiss or file a motion to extend time to respond.

3. The Clerk's Office is directed to set the following pro se case management 

deadline: November 9, 2023: check for opposition to motion to dismiss from Plaintiff Ava 

Solomon.

Dated this 20th day of October, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Court

8:23-cv-00207-JFB-PRSE Doc # 45 Filed: 10/20/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 215