alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                        SANCHEZ COMPUTER ASSOCIATES, INC
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11
 
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                    (In thousands, except per share data)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   QUARTER ENDED       SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                     JUNE 30,              JUNE 30,
                                                                               --------------------  --------------------
<S>                                                                            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                                                 1997       1996       1997       1996
                                                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net Earnings.................................................................  $     573  $     358  $     915  $     377
                                                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Average common shares outstanding............................................     11,190      8,406     11,176      8,406
Average common share equivalents.............................................        516        772        495        814
                                                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding.....     11,706      9,178     11,671      9,220
                                                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

Earnings per common share (1)................................................  $    0.05  $    0.04  $    0.08  $    0.04
                                                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(1) Primary and fully diluted income per share are the same for both periods
    presented.
 
(2) Earnings per common share calculations for each of the Company's quarters
    are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each
    quarter. Accordingly, the sum of the earnings per share for each of the
    quarters in a fiscal year (or period) may not equal the actual year-to-date
    earnings per share.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 125 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 125

 Posthumously proclaiming soldiers of Asian descent who fought in the 
        Civil War to be honorary citizens of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2002

  Mr. Honda (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
  Towns, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Frost, Mr. Underwood, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. 
  Baca, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. Norton, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Wu, Ms. 
Lofgren, Mr. Capuano, Ms. Carson of Indiana, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson 
 of Texas, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
   Meeks of New York, Mr. Filner, Ms. Brown of Florida, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
 Radanovich, and Mr. Pitts) introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Posthumously proclaiming soldiers of Asian descent who fought in the 
        Civil War to be honorary citizens of the United States.

Whereas the United States on rare occasions confers honorary citizenship on 
        individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to this country or 
        to humankind throughout the world;
Whereas honorary citizenship is and should remain an extraordinary honor not 
        lightly conferred nor frequently granted;
Whereas posthumous citizenship is an honorary status commemorating the bravery 
        and sacrifices of these persons; it does not convey any benefits under 
        the Immigration and Nationality Act to any relative of the decedent;
Whereas current law provides for the granting of United States citizenship to 
        aliens or noncitizen nationals of the United States who die because of 
        injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by honorable, active duty 
        service in the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas it has been determined that numerous soldiers of Asian descent fought 
        bravely and honorably in the Union and Confederate armed forces during 
        the United States Civil War;
Whereas many of these soldiers were denied citizenship following their service 
        as a result of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and general anti-Asian 
        sentiment prevalent at that time; and
Whereas the Congress overturned the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 in 1943 to end 
        this injustice to Asian immigrants but did not extend citizenship to 
        those who had rightfully earned this honor but were denied the chance to 
        seek it by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That soldiers of Asian descent 
who fought in the Civil War are posthumously proclaimed to be honorary 
citizens of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No. 8:00CR55

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

WILLIAM L. MATTAN, )

)

Defendant. )

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Continue, Filing No. 47, is granted. The

status hearing is rescheduled before the undersigned in Courtroom No. 3, Third Floor,

Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, on May 26,

2005, at 8:30 a.m. Since this is a criminal case, the defendant shall be present, unless

excused by the Court. If an interpreter is required, one must be requested by the plaintiff

in writing five (5) days in advance of the scheduled hearing.

DATED this 17th day of May, 2005.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon 

JOSEPH F. BATAILLON

United States District Judge

8:00-cr-00055-JFB Doc # 48 Filed: 05/17/05 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 35
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-160-PB

FNU LNU aka “Jose Soler”

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 3, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to finalize a plea agreement prior to trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 3, 2008 to September 3, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:05-cr-00160-JD Document 23 Filed 05/14/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 20, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

August 25, 2008 at 3:45 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 14, 2008

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Alfred J.T. Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00160-JD Document 23 Filed 05/14/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-284-01-SM

Robert Cennami

O R D E R

Defendant Cennami’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2007

trial period. Defendant Cennami shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than December 19, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: March 20, 2007 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: April 3, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00284-PB Document 15 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 12, 2006

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Clyde R.W. Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00284-PB Document 15 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2
#### AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIDWEST DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 7264.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1949.

*271Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellants.

White, Holloman & White, of Alexandria, for appellee.

KENNON, Judge.

The District Court gave judgment in favor of the American Automobile Insurance Company for the exact amounts paid by it as compensation to Mr. Kurzweg and to Henry Demby; for the amounts expended by it for surgical and hospital expenses to the same parties; and for the proven damage to the Oldsmobile sedan. These amounts were proven and are not here contested.

For the reasons assigned in, La.App., 38 So.2d 266, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Grange Mutual Casualty and Trustguard Insurance Company, Respondents,

v. 20/20 Auto Glass, LLC, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2020-000462
Appeal from Anderson County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

Mem orandum Opinion No. 2021-MO-006 Heard May 6, 2021 – Filed May 12, 2021

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Joshua Matthew Henderson, of Henderson Brandt & Vieth, PA, of Spartanburg, and Charles J. Lloyd, of Livgard & Lloyd, PLLP, of Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner. Ronald Barton Diegel and We sley Brian Sawyer, both of Murphy & Grantland, PA, of Columbia, for Respondents.PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Grange Mutual Casualty v. 20/20 Auto Glass, LLC , Op. No. 2019-UP

419 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Dec. 31, 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEAR N, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.