alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 81

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States restoring

religious freedom.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 20, 2001

Mr. ISTOOK (for himself, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. AKIN, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BAKER,

Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.

BARTON of Texas, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BROWN of South

Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. COMBEST, Mr.

CRANE, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr.

DEMINT, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. EVERETT,

Mr. FORBES, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. GOODE, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAVES, Mr.

GRUCCI, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. HANSEN, Ms. HART, Mr. HAYES, Mr.

HAYWORTH, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. HUNTER,

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. KERNS,

Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. LINDER, Mr.

LIPINSKI, Mr. MCHUGH, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. PITTS, Mr. POMBO, Mr.

RAHALL, Mr. RILEY, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. SHOWS,

Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. STEARNS,

Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. TERRY, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. VITTER, Mr.

WAMP, Mr. WATKINS of Oklahoma, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr.

WELDON of Florida, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States restoring religious freedom.
2

•HJ 81 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:

10 ‘‘ARTICLE—

11 ‘‘To secure the people’s right to acknowledge God ac12 cording to the dictates of conscience:

13 ‘‘Neither the United States nor any State shall estab14 lish any official religion, but the people’s right to pray and

15 to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions

16 on public property, including schools, shall not be in17 fringed.

18 ‘‘The United States and the States shall not compose

19 school prayers, nor require any person to join in prayer

20 or other religious activity.’’.

Æ
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 196TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th

day of August, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Devon Ray Davis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-15-00032-CR

Trial Court No. 22886

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the assessment of 

$2,337.00 in attorney fees. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Devon Ray Davis, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 29th day of September, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6970-6971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2126]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 21, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Douglas A. Banks, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. David E. Snyder; to acquire voting shares of Merchants Bancorp 
of Pennsylvania, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Merchants National Bank of Kittanning, all of Kittanning, Pennsylvania.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 PeachtreeStreet, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. William Blanton Sr., Alpharetta, Georgia; to acquire additional 
voting shares of United Americas Bankshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire additional voting shares of United

[[Page 6971]]

Americas Bank, N.A., both of Atlanta, Georgia.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Kelly J. Schoen; to acquire voting shares of Freedom Bancshares, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Freedom Bank, all 
of Overland Park, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 1, 
2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-2126 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Archstone-Smith
Operating Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the Issuer), hereby
certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Periodic Report) of the
Issuer for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m(a)) and that the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

|                  |  |                                         
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2003 |  |                                         
|                  |  |                                         
|                  |  |                                         
|                  |  | /s/ R. SCOT SELLERS                     
|                  |  |                                         
|                  |  | R. Scot Sellers, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 7 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
            Recognizing the 90th birthday of Ronald Reagan.

Whereas February 6, 2001, is the 90th birthday of Ronald Wilson Reagan;
Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan have distinguished records 
        of public service to the United States, the American people, and the 
        international community;
Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming margins as President of 
        the United States;
Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore ``the great, 
        confident roar of American progress, growth, and optimism'' and ensure 
        renewed economic prosperity;
Whereas Ronald Reagan's leadership was instrumental in extending freedom and 
        democracy around the globe and uniting a world divided by the Cold War;
Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of Americans, and by 
        countless others around the world;
Whereas Ronald Reagan's eloquence united Americans in times of triumph and 
        tragedy;
Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First Lady but also led a 
        national crusade against illegal drug use;
Whereas together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their lives to promoting 
        national pride and to bettering the quality of life in the United States 
        and throughout the world; and
Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the country are with Ronald 
        Reagan in his courageous battle with Alzheimer's disease: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress, on behalf 
of the American people, extends its birthday greetings and best wishes 
to Ronald Reagan on his 90th birthday.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. J. RES. 7

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

            Recognizing the 90th birthday of Ronald Reagan.
```
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1023

To amend the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs

Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2002 through 2007,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2001

Ms. DUNN (for herself, Mr. DEFAZIO, and Mr. WAMP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the

Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs Act to authorize appropriations for

fiscal years 2002 through 2007, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Schoolyard Safety Act

5 of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

7 (a) GRANTS.—Section 505 of the Incentive Grants

8 for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs Act (42

9 U.S.C. 5784) is amended—
2

•HR 1023 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)—

2 (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

3 the end;

4 (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the pe5 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

6 (C) by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(8) court supervised initiatives that address

8 the illegal possession of firearms by juveniles.’’; and

9 (2) in subsection (c)—

10 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1),

11 by striking ‘‘demonstrate ability in’’;

12 (B) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘have in

13 effect’’ after ‘‘(1)’’;

14 (C) in paragraph (2)—

15 (i) by inserting ‘‘have developed’’ after

16 ‘‘(2)’’; and

17 (ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;

18 (D) in paragraph (3)—

19 (i) by inserting ‘‘are actively’’ after

20 ‘‘(3)’’; and

21 (ii) by striking the period at the end

22 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

23 (E) by adding at the end the following:

24 ‘‘(4) have in effect a policy or practice that re25 quires State and local law enforcement agencies to
3

•HR 1023 IH

1 detain for not less than 24 hours any juvenile who

2 unlawfully possesses a firearm in a school upon a

3 finding by a judicial officer that the juvenile may be

4 a danger to himself or herself, or to the commu5 nity.’’.

6 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

7 506 of the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Preven8 tion Programs Act (42 U.S.C. 5785) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘$30,000,000’’ and all that fol10 lows through ‘‘1993 and’’; and

11 (2) by striking ‘‘1994, 1995, and 1996’’ and in12 serting ‘‘2002 through 2007’’.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TREMAIN MONROE,

Defendant.

8:23MJ251

ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE

DUE PROCESS PROTECTION ACT

This matter came before the Court for Initial Appearance on a Complaint. The government 

was represented by Kim C. Bunjer. The defendant was present and represented by Michael J. 

Hansen. 

IT IS ORDERED:

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' 

obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence as required by Brady v. Maryland, 

373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders the United States to do so. Failure to disclose 

exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited 

to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, 

or sanctions by the Court.

DATED: May 4, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ F.A. Gossett

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-mj-00251-SMB Doc # 18 Filed: 05/04/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 38
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1092

To ensure that amounts in the Victims of Crime Fund are fully obligated.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 19, 2001

Mr. SIMMONS (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr.

ROYCE, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. SHAYS, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York,

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Ms.

HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Mr. HALL of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To ensure that amounts in the Victims of Crime Fund are

fully obligated.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FULL OBLIGATION OF AMOUNTS IN THE VIC4 TIMS OF CRIME FUND.

5 Section 1402 of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984

6 (42 U.S.C. 10601) is amended by adding at the end the

7 following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(h)(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in

9 this Act (including the emergency reserve referred to in
2

•HR 1092 IH

1 subsection (d)(5)), the Director shall ensure that all sums

2 in the Fund in a fiscal year are in fact obligated in the

3 subsequent fiscal year.

4 ‘‘(2) A provision of law may not be construed as

5 modifying or superseding the provisions of paragraph (1)

6 unless that provision of law—

7 ‘‘(A) specifically refers to this section; and

8 ‘‘(B) specifically states that such provision of

9 law modifies or supersedes the provisions of this sec10 tion.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2381

JOSEPH BURCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 05-2382

JOSEPH BURCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INCORPORATED, a

corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,

District Judge. (CA-04-1032-1-WLO; CA-02-1124-1)

Submitted: May 19, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Burch, Appellant Pro Se. Wood Walter Lay, Eric Michael

David Zion, Jacqueline M. Yount, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Charlotte,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The district court subsequently granted Philip Morris’s

motion for sanctions in September 2005. Burch moved to pay the

sanctions in installments, and by order dated November 18, 2005,

the district court directed Burch to provide proof of indigency by

December 5, 2005, and provided that the sanction would be payable

in full on December 15, 2005, if Burch did not comply. Burch never

responded to the district court’s November 18 order to provide an

affidavit in support of his need for an installment payment plan,

and therefore, pursuant to its terms, the order was reduced to a

judgment for the full amount of the sanction on December 15, 2005.

Burch does not challenge the sanctions order in his informal brief

on appeal, so he has waived appellate review of that order. See

4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Burch filed two civil actions against Philip

Morris USA, Inc. In Burch’s first lawsuit, the district court

adopted the magistrate judge’s report and denied relief in January

2004. Burch moved to rescind the district court’s order, but that

motion was denied in June 2005. Burch’s appeal was assigned No.

05-2382. In Burch’s second action, the district court denied

relief in June 2005.*

 Burch’s appeal was assigned No. 05-2381.

Both notices of appeal were filed on December 5, 2005. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 
- 4 -

Because Burch failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period in either

case, we dismiss the appeals. We deny his motions for appointment

of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not assist in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 5, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | /S/ M. J. COHEN        
|                   |  | M. J. Cohen,           
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of Marathon Acquisition Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ Michael S. GrossName: Michael S. GrossDate:   March 17, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

Order 

February 2, 2021

161241-2(23)

PEGASUS WIND, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161241-2

COA: 351532; 351644

Tuscola CC: 19-030703-AA;

19-030723-AA

JUNIATA TOWNSHIP, JUNIATA TOWNSHIP

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, and JUNIATA 

TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

GREG AND CHERYL ACKERMAN, 

LYLE ACKERMAN, ROGER AND DIAN

ADAMS, TIMOTHY AND KRISTI BARBER,

BRADLEY AND GINGER BARNES, CAISTER

FARMS, INC., STELLA CLINESMITH, 

CUMMINGS-MONVILLE FARMS LLC,

ZELEM AND BARBARA ESTERLINE, FARM

MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, STAN AND

RITA FESSLER III, JOSEPH AND DEBRA

FESSLER, STEVEN FINDLAY, GARNER

LAND CO LLC, RONALD AND INGRID

GOEBEL, GOODCHILD FAMILY FARMS,

LLC, JANSON LAND COMPANY, LARACHA

INVESTMENTS, LLC, CORI MILLER, SUE

LYNN NEARING, VIRGIL NEARING,

BRANDON PALM, HEIKI PALM, 

PARAMOUNT ENTERPRISES LAND, PAUL

DOST FARMS, LLC, ROBERT PIKE, DAVID

AND KAREN PRATT, LARRY RUCKLE,

RUSSELL FAMILY LAND COMPANY, LLC,

STARKEY FARMS, INC., ELAINE STOICK,

GORDON AND DONNA TEDFORD, KELLY

WRIGHT, FRED AND ALBERTA HESS, JAN

AND BARB HESS, TOM HESS, HARLEY

MIKKELSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 2, 2021

a0125

2

Clerk

v

JUNIATA TOWNSHIP, JUNIATA TOWNSHIP

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, and JUNIATA 

TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 27, 

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7231

IN RE: GEORGE ANTHONY DEMPSEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-2890-9-20BG) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 24, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Anthony Dempsey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: George Anthony Dempsey petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Dempsey’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED