alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

p0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138832 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138832 

 COA: 281856 

Livingston CC: 05-015439-FH 

PHILLIP KEITH DUNLAP, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009). 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak, 484 

Mich 549 (2009).
| INVESTOR CONTACTS:                |                           |   | MEDIA CONTACT:                |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| David Whitehouse                  | Gregory Lundberg               |   | Brigid Smith                  |
| SVP & Treasurer               | Director, Investor Relations   |   | AVP Corp. Comm.               |
| (203) 614-5708                    | (203) 614-5044                 |   | (203) 614-5042                |
| david.whitehouse@frontiercorp.com | greg.lundberg@frontiercorp.com |   | brigid.smith@frontiercorp.com |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-184-01-SM

Theoun So

O R D E R

Defendant So’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial is

granted (document 17). Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2006 trial

period. Defendant So shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

March 31, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: June 13, 2006 at 1:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: June 20, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00184-SM Document 18 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 22, 2006

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Debra Walsh, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00184-SM Document 18 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 3 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 4 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 5 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 6 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 7 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 8 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 9 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 10 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 11 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 12 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 13 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 14 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 15 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 16 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 17 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 18 of 19Case 1:05-cv-00330-SM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 19 of 19
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

d0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138013

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138013 COA: 287853 Jackson CC: 03-001724-FH RICHARD JEFFREY KINT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
- ,

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEYGENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  **AUSTIN**

Baacwablo

Gliffapd9. Roe OountyAttorney maala County Cart&age,

Texas

Your writt8ara been ncrelved

and **eamide** as iollwfs,

a bottllag

11s tlmae&i&a **out %srt**  Texas. otthlsmw3.d be llag or lottmy. **buy** l **drink** aad **It ‘** **18 aot**  **fop gala**  **other than**  tb8 **tated** above, **18 sly**  

## W31.

Artiolo 659 of tha ParalCode of **thr** Stateof TUW, 1925, **proride** as r0iollovsr

"Xi say parsan **8hnl1** aatablish a lottely **or di&908e**  **Or 8tk~**  **WeAte, real**  **Or p0rSmai,**  **by lottory,**  **km** sbll be f%iwdnot lese than 06 hundmd nor mom than OLD@ thousand

Uollars~ **QF ii**  **3~17 pOr8C$X** **8hll 8di,**  **OrrW rOF**  **Bale OF**  keep for sale say tioket or part tloketIn any lottery,

b ehall be finednot leas thea teut nor more t&n fif%ydollara.* This depmtamt held in op.SrUm Ro. O-1918that the olereaotr

easeatial

to a iottmy aya (1) a prize; (2) ohwoo; (3) a oamIdwatlQa. City or Ylnk vs. GrIfrIthAmuseawt cacaslry

(auprew Cow), loo 3. Y. moment Cwpwy ~8. m, 98 8. W. ( d")f&! **J** C#rIyIth d)
**It is**  olear the **Pi~8,t; tw**  oletemta **are preseatt**  the prize is a "cma" drini: to tuo su33essfLil **perams** out or tam&y-four ori~;itaal ywohasero; li!cw&m the "abMo0" l lotmnt

**obarly am-8**  vhfttt **the UddS**  **a?0** camidsrad **by** 3fhi0h two 

### out 0r 

### tvmy-ropr **puroha8ers** 0r drwca, aii myiag ttu 8aa4 originai aoarido~ticaa, imp ii they me 8mll.dupaa **by** "LadrLuok"raoelvothe fr0e'drlnk8. **Ye** belleoothu tblrdalesamt,that of ma81dera~lCmlis llk~- **V18e ik**  **” eaGAt**  *mder the if&8 oubmlttorl sy sou. **fn t&8**  **OCII** motion YO sa3.l

your attesltlan

to tie diseumim **aad** authoritie ofted in oar oplnlat Ro. D-2&3, a so?g of uhloh ve **are ea431083ng**  r0r your asslstanue.Ue belisvsthe authoritie8 tboab **dl80288ed** sad oltedwe epually appllcrrble

to POW 8ubnitt.d

~08ittfXL.
**x0U** wo thOZ?OrWtI

lu8J?OOtw rdY%Wd at it i8 **the Opinit%L**  **Or this**  **d8pWttWttt that**  **fib PPOPO~O~**  **8Y8tW Or**  **8ah4w, rubanitted**  **in fo\tr**  **P@qUkWt,** CWtihUt08 * 1OttUy and **18 praUb;tcsd**  by Artisle: 654 of tha Pen81 Cod. of the **Mate** 0r TUW, 1925.

.
ex_154622.htm


Exhibit 10.215


 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED


UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


(Original Principal Amount $7,000,000)


 


This Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Unsecured Promissory Note (the "Amendment") is made as of June 30, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), by and between TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS, INC., a Nevada corporation ("Maker"), and GOLISANO HOLDINGS LLC, a New York limited liability company ("Holder").


 


WHEREAS, the Maker is indebted to the Holder under a certain Amended and Restated Unsecured Promissory Note in the principal amount of Seven Million Dollars ($7,000,000) dated August 30, 2017 (the "Note"); and


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder have agreed to amend the Note in accordance with this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.     In the introduction paragraph, the phrase "June 30, 2019" is hereby restated in its entirety to read as "October 22, 2021" such that the Maturity Date shall be October 22, 2021.


 


2.     Except as expressly amended hereby, all terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.     Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Note to "the Note," "this Note," "hereunder," "hereof," "herein," or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Note, as amended by this Amendment.


 


4.     This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, and agreements between such parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. To the extent of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the Note, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern.


 


5.     This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, including by means of facsimile and/or portable document format, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall together constitute one and the same document.


 


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 


 


Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated


Unsecured Promissory Note ($7,000,000 - Golisano Holdings)


 



 




 




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Holder have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


 


	
			 

				
			TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS, INC.

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By: 

				
			/s/ Anthony Zolezzi

				
			 Date:  7/8/2019

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 Anthony Zolezzi

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 Chief Executive Officer

				
			 

			



 


 


 


	
			 

				
			GOLISANO HOLDINGS LLC

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By: 

				
			/s/ B. Thomas Golisano

				
			 Date:  7/8/2019

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			      B. Thomas Golisano


			      Member

				
			 

			



 


 


Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated


Unsecured Promissory Note ($7,000,000 - Golisano Holdings)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 9/30/96 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE 9-MONTHS ENDED 9/30/96.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,844
<SECURITIES>                                    22,506
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                       314
<INVENTORY>                                      7,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,183
<PP&E>                                          16,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,162
<BONDS>                                             45
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,400
<SALES>                                         39,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,741
<CGS>                                           28,511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                       116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
        

</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADDEDBY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of ARYA Sciences Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Altman, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the report. 

Date: April 17, 2020 

 

/s/ Michael Altman
Name: Michael AltmanTitle: 
Chief Financial Officer and Director

*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*
**
#### CAZALAS v. ANSARDI et al.

No. 17551.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 20, 1942.

A. Giffen Levy, of New Orleans, for appellants.

Milo B. Williams, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for both defendants-appellants and plaintiff-appellee have filed here a joint motion in this matter in which they set forth:

> “1. That the present appeal was taken from a judgment rendered and signed in Chambers at St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, by J. C. Meraux, Judge, on December 30, 1940, and that it is conceded that said judgment is a nullity because it was not read, rendered and signed in open Court as provided by law, a fact which is patent on the face of the record.

> “2. That it is, accordingly, proper and desirable that the judgment appealed from *589be voided and annulled, and this case remanded for submission to -the acting Judge of the Twenty-fifth Judicial District Court.”

The parties being entitled to the relief asked for,

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is annulled, avoided and reversed, and that this cause be and it is remanded to the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Plaquemines, for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed and according to law.

Reversed and remanded.
JOHN W. PALMER

,

Appellant,

v.

SARASOTA COUNTY

GOVERNMENT/OPTA COMP.

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3575

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 19, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Di ane B. Beck , Judge

.

Date of Accident: February 22, 2000 and October 15, 2003

.

Kimberly A . Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale , for Appellant.

Stephen E. Demarsh, County Attorney, and Maria D. Korn, Assistant County

Attorney, Sarasota , for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C. J., MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 05-cv-384-JD

Land and Buildings Located at

295 Cyr Road, Littleton, New

Hampshire, with all Appurtenances

and Improvements Thereon, Owned by

Wanda Yulfo and Luis Yulfo

O R D E R

Upon application of Wanda Yulfo and finding that under 18

U.S.C. § 983(b)(2)(a) the applicant is financially unable to

obtain representation by counsel in this case regarding real

property subject to forfeiture that is being used by the

applicant as a primary residence, and on consent of the Legal

Services Corporation that Attorney Michael Sheehan may provide

representation to the applicant on its behalf, the court orders

that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983 the Legal Services Corporation

shall provide counsel to the applicant and that Attorney Michael

Sheehan shall be such counsel.

Furthermore, it is hereby ordered that any judgment for fees

and costs for LSC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(b)(2)(B) shall be

awarded to Attorney Michael Sheehan or the Legal Services

Corporation subject to the submission of appropriate statements

of such fees and costs and the consent of the Legal Services

Case 1:05-cv-00384-JD Document 16 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Corporation.

Attorney Michael Sheehan shall promptly file an appearance

in this matter on behalf of Wanda Yulfo.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

January 25, 2006

cc: Gregory A. Moffett, Esquire

Robert J. Rabuck, Esquire

Wanda Yulfo, pro se

Luis Yulfo, pro se

Michael Sheehan, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00384-JD Document 16 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Terry T. Thomas

v. Case No. 04-cv-437-PB

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, et 

ORDER

Re: Document No. 32, Motion for an Expedited Hearing

Ruling: Plaintiff raises a number of issues. 1.The court will

independently address the Motion for Protective Order now that

defense counsel has finally filed the Response to Objection. 

2. The court assumes that defendants served the response (two

months late) on plaintiff. 3. An answer to the amended complaint

was filed with the court on February 9,2006. Whether or not it

was served then on plaintiff he didn't get it. Defendants are to

immediately deliver a copy to plaintiff. 4. The Motion to Compel 

Order was entered and sent out on March 16, 2006. 5. The request

to discontinue CM/ECF is denied. Nevertheless it appears that a

further scheduling conference is in order. Therefore the request

for a hearing is granted and the Clerk is requested to schedule

it. If counsel would prefer it be done by video conference cunsel

should set it up with the Deputy. 

 

/s/ James R. Muirhead

James R. Muirhead

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Date: April 6, 2006

cc: Terry Thomas, Pro se 

John Curran, Esq.

Carolyn Kirby, Esq.

Elizabeth Hurley, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00437-PB Document 39 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 74 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.74

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-44 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``December 7, 2001''; and by striking the 
date specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu thereof ``December 
1, 2001''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I,
Ralph Izzo, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public
Service Enterprise Group Incorporated.

| |                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ralph
 Izzo                              
| |                                              
| | Ralph Izzo                                   
| | Public
 Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
| | Chief
 Executive Officer                     
| | October 31,
 2008                            

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-79-01-SM

Jeffrey Edmunds

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 24) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than March 13, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00079-SM Document 25 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 23, 2006 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: April 4, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 7, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

 Bjorn Lange, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00079-SM Document 25 Filed 03/07/06 Page 2 of 2