alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  as of  April  30,  2000  and  is
qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such   consolidated   financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               Jul-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                  Feb-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                    Apr-30-2000
<CASH>                                                               20,000
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     6,607,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      1,039,000
<INVENTORY>                                                       7,340,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 13,847,000
<PP&E>                                                              247,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   22,238,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             8,518,000
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                             35,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     22,238,000
<SALES>                                                           4,984,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  4,984,000
<CGS>                                                             2,446,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     2,446,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  2,184,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  129,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     225,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 212,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        212,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0.07


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1954

In Re: JANSE ELIOT COOKE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:10-cv-00156-LPA)

Submitted: March 13, 2012 Decided: April 4, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janse Eliot Cooke, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Janse Eliot Cooke petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the 

district court’s docket reveals that the district court has 

recently ruled on Cooke’s petition. Accordingly, although we 

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus 

petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136808 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

## Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices



## v SC: 136808 COA: 284557 Wayne CC: 07-012810-FC RAYMOND PNIEWSKI, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the May 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-143-01-JD

Donald Wonders

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

40) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: March 15, 2007

cc: Mark Sisti, Esq.

Debra Walsh, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00143-JD Document 41 Filed 03/15/07 Page 1 of 1
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00017-CR

Johnny Mack Durham Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-07-30890-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 29, 2020
#### FOUNTAIN MOTEL, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. DISTINCTIVE HOMES, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee. FOUNTAIN MOTEL, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. DISTINCTIVE HOMES, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee, and George Charles, Intervenor-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Jan. 7, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-167-01-PB

Dario Manon

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the December 5, 2006 

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date. 

In order to allow the parties additional time to negotiate a

plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from December 5, 2006 to February 6, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00167-PB Document 33 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The November 28, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

until January 18, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.

No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 22, 2006

cc: Paul Garrity, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00167-PB Document 33 Filed 11/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Filed 3/1/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 40

Sean Michael Kovalevich, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160194

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Sean Michael Kovalevich, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160325

Appeals from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jon J. Jensen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 First Street N.W., Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for petitioner and appellant in No. 20160194.

Meredith H. Larson, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5607 for respondent, plaintiff and appellee.

Sean Michael Kovalevich, self-represented, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506 in No. 20160325; on brief.

Kovalevich v. State

Nos. 20160194 & 20160325

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Sean Kovalevich appeals from district court orders denying his motions for a new trial and his application for post-conviction relief.  After a jury verdict, Kovalevich’s convictions for two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of corruption of a minor were affirmed in State v. Kovalevich, 2015 ND 11, 858 N.W.2d 625.  Kovalevich thereafter applied for post-conviction relief, alleging prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel.  The district court granted summary dismissal of Kovalevich’s claim for prosecutorial misconduct and dismissed his ineffective assistance of counsel claim after an evidentiary hearing.  Kovalevich, with counsel, filed a motion for new trial in the post-conviction proceeding, claiming newly discovered evidence.  Kovalevich also filed a self- represented motion for new trial in the criminal prosecution, claiming the Bureau of Criminal Investigation lacked jurisdiction to investigate the charges against him.  The district court denied both motions.  

[¶2]On appeal, Kovalevich argues he was entitled to a new trial because the State failed to disclose evidence to him during discovery, he was deprived the opportunity to effectively cross-examine a witness about prior inconsistent statements, and he received ineffective assistance of counsel.  In a self-represented supplemental statement under N.D.R.App.P. 24, Kovalevich argues the Bureau of Criminal Investigation did not have jurisdiction to investigate him.

[¶3]We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Kovalevich’s motions for new trial and did not clearly err in denying his post- conviction claim for ineffective assistance of counsel.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Carol Ronning Kapsner
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0132]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “State Petitions for Exemption from Preemption” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 16, 2008 (73 FR 34024), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0277. The approval expires on August 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: September 4, 2008.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E8-21020 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. CR. 05-111-01-SM

Gabriel Kanakis-Hines,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Kanakis-Hines’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference

and trial is granted (document no. 18). Defendant Kanakis-Hines has filed a

Waiver of Speedy Trial. Trial has been rescheduled for the month of April 

2006. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:05-cr-00111-SM Document 20 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for March 22, 2005 at 

3:00 p.m. in Room 421. 

Jury selection will take place on April 4, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

February 27, 2006

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Don Feith, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00111-SM Document 20 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3284-EM]


Texas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Texas (FEMA-3284-EM), dated March 14, 2008, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 1, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 1, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-20816 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
217 La. 735

#### STATE v. ASHER.

No. 39850.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 29, 1950.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1950.

*478C. C. Luzenberg, Jr., New Orleans, for ■defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Attorney General, M. E. Culligan, Ass’t Attorney General, Herve Racivitch, District Attorney, Girard J. Fernandez, Ass’t District Attorney, New Orleans, for appellee.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

There are no errors patent on the face of the record in this case and the only complaint of the accused is contained in a Bill of Exceptions reserved to the ruling of the trial judge denying his motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. Since this court is without appellate jurisdiction to review the facts in criminal cases and there is no declaration in this lone hill of the nature of any error of law committed during the trial, this appeal presents nothing for our review.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      18,151,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,895,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (144,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,046,000
<PP&E>                                     245,052,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,188,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             301,897,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,466,000
<BONDS>                                    139,243,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,737,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,270,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               301,897,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,133,000
<CGS>                                       23,196,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,510,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,480,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,053,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,053,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.2

                    COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE




                                           Three Months       Three months
                                              Ended              Ended
                                             March 31,          March 31,
                                               1997               1998
                                           ------------       ------------
Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding                          3,948,703          3,971,047
Additional shares assuming conversion
 of stock options and warrants (1)             167,833            307,421

Weighted average shares outstanding          4,116,536          4,278,468
                                            ==========         ==========

Net income                                  $1,054,000         $1,439,000
                                            ==========         ==========

Diluted earnings per share                  $     0.26         $     0.34
                                            ==========         ==========


(1) Calculated using the Treasury Stock method.
Amendment No. 1 to Custom Sales Agreement dated January 13, 2005



 Exhibit 10.40 
  
 AMENDMENT 1 TO CUSTOM SALES AGREEMENT NO. 000569 
  
 This Amendment to Custom Sales Agreement No. 000569 (“Amendment 1”) is made and entered into between Microtune, Inc.
(“Customer”), and International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”). This Amendment 1 shall be effective as of November 1, 2004 (the “Effective Date”). 
  
 WHEREAS IBM and Customer are parties to Custom Sales Agreement No. 000569 having an effective date of June 13, 2000 (the
“Agreement”); 
  
 WHEREAS IBM and Customer desire to amend the Agreement
as set forth herein; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE the parties hereby agree as follows:

  

	1.	 	Extension of the term of the Agreement. The expiration of the term of the Agreement is extended from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2006. 

  

	2.	 	Sections 2.5 and 2.6 are deleted effective November 1, 2004. 

  
 3.       No Other Amendment or Modification. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment 1, the Agreement remains in full force
and effect without further modification. The terms and conditions of the Agreement and such Amendments shall not be further modified or amended except by a writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties, it being understood that this
requirement of written form may only be waived in writing by both parties. 
  

									
	 Acceptedand Agreed To:
 Microtune, Inc.
	 	 	 	International Business Machines Corporation
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Albert H. Tadikken

	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ John G. Beiswenger


	 	 	Authorized Signature	 	 	 	 	 	Authorized Signature
					
	Name:	 	 Albert H. Tadikken

	 	 	 	Name:	 	John G. Beiswenger
	 	 	Please print or type name	 	 	 	 	 	 
					
	Title:	 	 COO

	 	 	 	Title:	 	 Exec. Mgr., MD WW Contracts &
 Business Practices, IBM Technology Group

	 	 	Please print or type title	 	 	 	 	 
					
	Date:	 	 January 13, 2005

	 	 	 	Date:	 	 January 14, 2005


	 	 	Write Month out in full	 	 	 	 	 	Write Month out in full

  


					
	 Custom Sales Agreement No. 000569
 Amendment No. 1
12/15/04
 Rev. 10/22/04
	 	Page 1 of 1	 	Microtune, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Yuma Energy,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September
30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sam L. Banks, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
 The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2.
 The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











/s/ Sam L. Banks


Sam L.
Banks


President and Chief
Executive Officer


November 14,
2016










The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.





A
signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to, and will be retained by, the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.