alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens  Communications Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Leonard Tow, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Leonard Tow
-----------------------
Leonard Tow
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Citizens  Communications  Company
and will be retained by Citizens  Communications  Company and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 10, 2018 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust
2018-4 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution
and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp.
in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated:  March 6, 2020
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In Re: Stockeryale, Inc.

Securities Litigation Civil No. 05-cv-177-SM

O R D E R

Re: Motion to Reconsider (Document No. 55)

Ruling: Granted. Putative class member, Nickalus T. Holt,

seeks reconsideration of the denial of his motion to extend the

time in which he had to opt out of the approved class settlement. 

His pro se motion, while not in proper form, represents, but not

under oath, that " . . . I did not get any notice of the date by

which I had to exercise my right to [opt] out of the

[s]ettlement." (Emphasis added.) Defendants oppose the motion,

contending that even if Holt did not actually receive the mailed

notice of his right to opt out until after the date for

exercising it had passed, as he claims, still, Holt had actual

notice through a variety of sources, as well as constructive

notice, and, indeed, they point out that Holt was a named

plaintiff in this case, that legal counsel appeared on his behalf

and has represented him throughout, and that he has received

actual notice of all orders, including those establishing

deadlines, particularly the deadline for opting out of the class

settlement., through His legal counsel in this very case. A

quick review of the docket sheet establishes that Holt's counsel

received copies of all pertinent orders and pleadings through the

end of this litigation. Having reconsidered the matter, the

court denies Holt's motion to extend the time in which he may opt

out of the class settlement, for the reasons set out in

defendants' opposition, and because the motion provides an

insufficient factual basis for such relief, given that he plainly

received actual notice through his authorized representative of

all critical dates and yet did not act until well after the final

order and judgment were entered.

Case 1:05-cv-00177-SM Document 57 Filed 03/21/08 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

______________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: March 21, 2008

cc: William L. Chapman, Esq.

R. Todd Cronan, Esq.

Douglas C. Doskocil, Esq.

Jennifer a. Eber, Esq.

Christine Friedman, Esq.

Inez H. Friedman-Boyce, Esq.

Francis G. Kelleher, Esq.

Phillip Kim, Esq.

Mark L. Mallory, Esq.

Laurence Rosen, Esq.

Alexander J. Walker, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00177-SM Document 57 Filed 03/21/08 Page 2 of 2
exv10wqw5



 




Exhibit 10-Q-5



[FORD LOGO]



World Headquarters





One American Road





Dearborn, MI 48126-2798





March      , 2005



 


			
	
    TO:
    		
    LL2 and Above Employees
    
	 
	
    SUBJECT:
    		
    Final Award for the 2002-2004 Performance Stock
    Right Grant
    



     
The 2002-2004 performance period for the 2002
Performance Stock Right grants (sometimes referred to as LTI
grants) ended on December 31, 2004. Performance metrics for
the 2002 grant provide a final award based on Ford Motor
Company’s total shareholder return (stock appreciation plus
dividends) relative to other companies in the S&P 500. For
the 2002-2004 performance period, Ford Motor Company ranked in
the                     percentile.
Based on this result, the performance metrics would provide a
final award
of           %
of the initial grant. The Compensation Committee has approved
final awards at this level to be made on March 11, 2005.



     
In recognition of the Company’s
accomplishments, as well as your personal contributions to our
collective efforts, you will receive a final award in Ford
common stock (net after taxes) related to your 2002 Performance
Stock Right grant. If you are a U.S. based employee and elected
to defer the final award, a credit will be made to your deferral
account under the Deferred Compensation Plan, as described in
the enclosures. Your award is made under the 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and is subject to its provisions.



     
Further information on your final award,
including the basis for this award, is provided in the
enclosures.



     
Thank you for your contribution to the
achievement of our objectives during the 2002-2004 performance
period.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 3 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 3

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct popular 
   election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct popular 
   election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be elected by 
the people of the several States and the district constituting the seat 
of government of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The electors in each State shall have the 
qualifications requisite for electors of Senators and Representatives 
in Congress from that State, except that the legislature of any State 
may prescribe less restrictive qualifications with respect to residence 
and Congress may establish uniform residence and age qualifications.
    ``Section 3. The persons having the greatest number of votes for 
President and Vice President shall be elected.
    ``Section 4. Each elector shall cast a single vote jointly 
applicable to President and Vice President. Names of candidates may not 
be joined unless they shall have consented thereto and no candidate may 
consent to the candidate's name being joined with that of more than one 
other person.
    ``Section 5. The Congress may by law provide for the case of the 
death of any candidate for President or Vice President before the day 
on which the President-elect or Vice President-elect has been chosen, 
and for the case of a tie in any election.
    ``Section 6. This article shall apply with respect to any election 
for President and Vice President held after the expiration of the 1-
year period which begins on the date of the ratification of this 
article.''.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 34483.

Department Two.

January 30, 1958.]

#### *In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of*Ralph R. King, *Petitioner,*v. B. J. Rhay, *as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.*
      *1*

*Ralph R. King, pro se.*

*The Attorney General*and *Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant, for respondent.*

Reported in 320 P. (2d) 1102.

Per Curiam.

On June 15, 1956, the petitioner entered a plea of guilty to the “crime of violating Section 9.54.020 of the revised code of Washington (commonly known as ‘joy riding’).” Judgment and sentence was thereupon entered by the superior court, providing that petitioner be punished by imprisonment for a period of not more than twenty years.

For the reasons indicated in the *per curiam*opinion in *In re Richey v. Squier, ante*p. 38, 315 P. (2d) 638, filed September 17, 1957, the petitioner is to be returned to the court where his plea was entered, and that court is directed to impose a corrected sentence of not more than ten years, as provided by the properly applicable statute, *i.e.*RCW 9.92.010, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2265.

Writ of *habeas corpus*denied; imposition of corrected sentence directed.
1

 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1087

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Jose D. Rosario, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 19, 2010

 Filed: February 15, 2011

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose D. Rosario appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his motion to suppress

evidence seized from his commercial truck. Because Rosario pled guilty without

reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress, we affirm.

A state trooper in the Missouri State Highway Patrol’s Commercial Vehicle

Enforcement Division stopped Rosario’s truck for inspection, and Rosario consented

to a search that uncovered over 24 kilograms of cocaine. The district court denied
-2-

Rosario’s motion to suppress, and Rosario pled guilty to possession with intent to

distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Rosario

to 87 months imprisonment. 

On appeal, Rosario contends that the district court erred in denying his motion

to suppress because the trooper expanded the scope of the regulatory stop without

reasonable suspicion. Additionally, in his pro se filings, Rosario argues that Arizona

v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (2009), which limits searches incident to arrest in the vehicle

context, mandates reversal.

We do not reach the merits of Rosario’s suppression arguments because he

waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress by not reserving it

when he pled guilty. United States v. Harner, No. 10-1624, 2011 WL 43606, at *1

(8th Cir. Jan. 7, 2011) (citing United States v. Freeman, 625 F.3d 1049, 1052 (8th Cir.

2010)). With the consent of the court and the government, a defendant may enter a

conditional guilty plea “reserving in writing the right to have an appellate court review

an adverse determination of a specified pretrial motion.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2).

Rosario alleges he had an informal understanding with the government that his guilty

plea was conditional. This agreement, however, was never formalized in writing or

presented to the district court, and Rosario is bound by the unconditional guilty plea

that the district court entered.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________
Case 1:05-cv-00340-PB   Document 24   Filed 03/09/06   Page 1 of 1
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 69

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2001

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following joint resolution

OCTOBER 17, 2001

Committee on Appropriations discharged; which was considered and passed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2002, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 107–44 is further amended by striking

4 the date specified in section 107(c) and inserting in lieu

5 thereof ‘‘October 31, 2001’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board; Notice 
of Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the next meeting of the National Small Business 
Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 1 p.m. 
EST.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held via conference call.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the meeting 
of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and 
counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small 
Business Development Centers.
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:
--Follow-up on ASBDC Conference.
--SBA Update from AA/OSBDC.
--Board Planning.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
attend and/or make a presentation to the Board must contact Alanna 
Falcone by Friday, October 17, 2008, by fax or e-mail in order to be 
placed on the agenda. Alanna Falcone, Program Analyst, 409 Third 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 202-619-1612, Fax, 202-481-
0134, e-mail, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6d7dad7d8d8d798d0d7dad5d9d8d3f6c5d4d798d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="53323f323d3d327d35323f303c3d36132031327d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the 
information above.

Cherylyn H. Lebon,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-21552 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard J. Tanenbaum III, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. for the period January 17, 2006 (date of inception) to December 31, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2007          
|                              
|/s/ Bernard J. Tanenbaum III  
|Name: Bernard J. Tanenbaum III
|Title: Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:04-cr-00155-PB Document 47 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cr-00155-PB Document 47 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.





This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of July 2, 2018 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection
with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the
Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:





| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from August 15, 2018 through December 31, 2018,
and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                                                            
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                                            
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                                                          
|                                     | Connie Coffey                                                              
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate
Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer