alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

COLTON BRAYTON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 

LLC, and EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendants.

4:23CV3077

ORDER

The court has been advised that Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information 

Solutions, Inc. have settled their claims. (Filing No. 24).

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that: 

1) Within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this order, the relevant 

parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive 

stipulation) with the clerk of the court.

2) Absent compliance with this order, all claims against Defendant Experian 

(including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further 

notice.

3) All pending motions are denied as moot.

4:23-cv-03077-JMG-CRZ Doc # 25 Filed: 08/03/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 107
4) The clerk shall terminate the pretrial and trial settings and any hearings or 

deadlines involving Defendant Experian.

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cv-03077-JMG-CRZ Doc # 25 Filed: 08/03/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 108
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Mark O’Dell and

Patricia O’Dell,

Plaintiffs

v. Civil No. 05-cv-366-SM

P.M. MacKay & Sons, Inc.;

Lou Ann Fornataro, individually,

and d/b/a Lou Ann Fornataro,

Registered Architect, P.A.,

Defendants

O R D E R

A status conference was held on September 16, 2008. The

case is settled as between plaintiffs and defendants. A

potential issue remains with respect to apportionment of

settlement proceeds, but counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for

the worker’s compensation insurance carrier and lienholder (The

Hartford) are confident that the matter can be successfully

negotiated in short order.

Accordingly, the case is dismissed as to all defendants by

reason of settlement, and shall be administratively closed, but

subject to reopening on motion of either plaintiff or the

Hartford, should an agreement with respect to apportionment prove

unattainable. If, as anticipated, an agreement is forthcoming, a

joint motion for approval of settlement shall be filed for the

court’s prompt consideration.

Case 1:05-cv-00366-SM Document 23 Filed 09/17/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

September 17, 2008

cc: Jeffrey L. Alitz, Esq.

Christopher A. Bandazian, Esq.

Denise Lauretti, Esq.

Thomas K. McCraw, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00366-SM Document 23 Filed 09/17/08 Page 2 of 2
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 33 0 . QUI NTAVEUS W I LLI AMS v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 3 ,Qu in t av eu s W i l l i am s en t ered a g ui l t y p l ea t o arm ed ro b b ery

, h i jack i n g

a m o t or v eh i cl e, an d p os s es s i o n o f a fi rearm du r i n g t h e co m m i s s i o n of a fel o n y

. In

M ay 2 0 1 7

, h e fi l ed a m o t i o n t o s et as i d e t h e j u d gm en t o f co n v ict i o n p u rs u an t to

OCGA § 9 -1 1-6 0

, as s ert i ng t h at t h e i n d ict m en t was v o i d

. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e

m o ti o n

, an d W i l l i am s fi l ed th i s d i rect ap p eal

. T h e St at e has fi l ed a m o t i o n t o d i s m i ss

t h e ap peal o n t h e g ro u n d t h at W i l l i a m s i s n o t au t h o ri zed t o s eek rel i ef fro m h i s

co n vi ct i o n s b y

fi li n g a m o t i o n t o s et as i d e. W e ag ree.

“ It h as b een hel d m an y t i m es t h at a m ot i on to s et as i d e a ju d g m en t i s

i n ap p ro p ri at e i n a cri m i n al cas e.” La cey v. S t at e

, 2 53 Ga. 7 1 1

, 7 11 (3 2 4 SE2 d 4 7 1 )

(1 9 8 5). Reg ard l es s o f h ow i t i s s t y l ed

, a m o t i o n s eek i n g t o ch al len g e an al l eg e d l y

i n v al i d o r v o i d ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct i o n “ i s no t o n e o f t h e es t ab l i s h ed p ro ced u res fo r

ch al l en g i n g th e v al id i t y o f a ju d g m en t i n a cri m i nal cas e.” Ro b er t s v. S t at e

, 2 8 6 Ga.

5 3 2

, 5 32 (6 9 0 SE2 d 15 0 ) (2 0 1 0 ). Becau s e W i l l i am s i s n o t au t h o ri zed t o co l l at eral l y

at t ack hi s co n v i ct io n i n t h i s m an n er, t h e St at e’ s m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s i s h ereb y

GRANTED an d t h i s ap p eal i s DISM ISSED. See i d .; s ee al so Ha rp er v. S t a te

, 2 8 6 Ga.

2 1 6 , 2 1 8 (1 ) & (2 ) (6 8 6 SE2 d 7 8 6 ) (2 0 0 9 ). October 09, 2019C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/09/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALEXZANDRA BLANCO, 

Defendant. 

8:23CR117 

ORDER 

 

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for 

Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 37). For good cause shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1) Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 

37), is granted. 

2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 6, 2023. 

3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice 

will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of 

this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and September 6, 2023, shall be 

deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the 

Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny counsel the reasonable time 

necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, 

and the novelty and complexity of the case. The failure to grant this motion might result 

in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object 

to this order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any 

right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. 

 Dated this 7th day of August, 2023. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Susan M. Bazis 

United States Magistrate Judge 

8:23-cr-00117-BCB-SMB Doc # 39 Filed: 08/07/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 77
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                               June 30      December 31
                                                 1998           1997   

ASSETS
     <S>                                          <C>            <C>
     Rentals receivable under capital lease       $9,150         $9,150
     Cash                                             38             39

                                                  $9,188         $9,189
     

LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

     Liabilities:
          Accounts payable and
            accrued liabilities                   $   16         $   22

     Shareholder's equity:

          Shares of beneficial interest, at
            no par value, 1,510,000 shares
            issued and outstanding                 9,145          9,145
          Income retained in business                 27             22

               Total Shareholders' Equity          9,172          9,167

               Total Liabilities and
                 Shareholders' Equity             $9,188         $9,189


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Plaintiff,

Case No. 05-cv-431-

COLLEEN BADGER

FCI USA, INC. GROUP DISABILITY

INCOME INSURANCE PLAN

FCI USA, INC.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT

INSURANCE CO.

Defendant.

STIPULA TION OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(I), the parties stipulate to dismiss the above-captioned

matter with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted

COLLEEN BADGER

By her attorneys

GA WRYL 

Dated: August 24 2006 By: Isl Jared O' Connor (#15868)

Jared O' Connor, NH Bar No. 

41 East Pearl Street

Nashua, NH 03060

(603) 882-3252

ioconnor~gmac-Iaw. com

Case 1:05-cv-00431-SM Document 21 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
and

FCI USA, INC. GROUP DISABILITY

INCOME INURANCE PLAN

FCI USA, INC.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT

INSURANCE CO.

By their attorneys

SHEEHAN PHINNEY BASS + GREEN

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIA 

Dated: August 24 2006 By: Isl John-Mark Turner (#15610)

John-Mark Turner, NH Bar No. 

1000 Elm Street I P. O. Box 3701

Manchester, NH 03105-3701

(603) 627-8150

jturner~sheehan. com

CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 24th day of August, 2006, a copy of the within was sent via

the Court's ECF system to:

Jared 0' Connor

Gawryl & MacAllister

41 East Pearl Street

Nashua, NH 03060

(603) 882-3252

ioconnor~gmac-Iaw. com

Isl John-Mark Turner 

John-Mark Turner

Case 1:05-cv-00431-SM Document 21 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No. 06-cv-37-

Dynamic Network Systems, Inc.

Timothy Wilde

Defendant

AFFIDA VIT OF SERVICE

Judith A. Van Kalken, under oath affirm as follows:

1. I 

Green, P.

2. On March 29, 2006, I executed an Affidavit of Service. In furtherance of my

Affidavit, I would like to add the following information.

3. On , 2006, I received from the United States Postal Service, the original

unclaimed registered mail envelope addressed to the Defendant, Timothy Wilde at his

last known address, 1175 Lake Boulevard, No. 105, Davis, CA, This registered mail

envelope contained the service of process including copies of the Summons in a Civil

Action, Complaint, ECF Notice, Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge

Corporate Disclosure pursuant to Local Rule 7. , the Civil Cover sheet, and an attested to

copy of the Merrimack County Sheriff s Return of Service on the New Hampshire

Secretary of State in the above-captioned case, pursuant to NHRSA 510: 

Exhibit A is a true copy of the United State Postal Service envelope which indicates that

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 10 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
Mr. Wilde was notified of the package on March 4 2006, and March 9 2006 and the

United States Postal Service returned the unclaimed package on March 24 2006.

4. I , counsel for the Plaintiff in this case, that

the Attorney Cole forwarded a copy of the Complaint to Mr. Wilde s counsel, John

Marlow on February 1 2006. Attached as Exhibit B is a true copy of Attorney Cole

email to Attorney Marlow.

5. On February 2 2006 Attorney Marlow sent an email to Attorney Cole

acknowledging that he received the letter and attachments and would discuss them with

Mr. Wilde. Attached as Exhibit s email to

Christopher Cole.

This ends my affidavit testimony.

Dated: April 3 2006

Isl Judith A. 

Judith A. Van Kalken

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

Before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Judith A. Van Kalken

and under oath stated that the above Affidavit subscribed by her is true, to the best of her

knowledge, information and belief.

Isl Carol A. 

Justice of the Peace/Notary Public

My commission expires: 9/21/1 0

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 10 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Puget
      Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc .
      (the
      "Companies") on Form 10-Q for
      the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
      10-Q"), I, Stephen
      P. Reynolds, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Form
      10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.











Date:
                November 2, 2006/s/Stephen
                P. ReynoldsStephen
                P. ReynoldsChairman,
                President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand
Capital SBIC, L.P. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





    Dated: November 12, 2003


                                                 /s/ ALLEN F. GRUM
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Allen F. Grum, President of Rand Capital
                                                   Corporation
                                      (equivalent of chief executive officer of
                                             Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)

    Dated: November 12, 2003


                                              /s/ DANIEL P. PENBERTHY
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer of Rand
                                               Capital Corporation
                                      (equivalent of chief financial officer of
                                              Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1222 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1222

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to conduct a 
study of developing residential mortgage programs that provide low-cost 
        health insurance in connection with low-cost mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2001

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to conduct a 
study of developing residential mortgage programs that provide low-cost 
        health insurance in connection with low-cost mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY OF MORTGAGES THAT PROVIDE LOW-COST HEALTH INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 
shall conduct a study to determine feasibility, practicality, 
effectiveness, and costs of developing new programs, or making changes 
to existing programs administered by the Secretary (including the 
mortgage insurance programs under the National Housing Act), to provide 
low-cost health insurance in connection with low-cost residential 
mortgages.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall complete the study and submit to the 
Congress a report describing the results of the study. The report shall 
include recommendations for any new programs or changes to existing 
programs that the Secretary considers effective and efficient to make 
low-cost health insurance available in connection with low-cost-
residential mortgages.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6919
FRANK WEATHERS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, Director of the SCDC; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-3720-18BC) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 10, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Weathers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Frank Weathers seeks to appeal a district court order adopting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on his petitionfiled under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and a subsequent order denying relief on Weather's "Motion to Reconsider," broadly construed as a motion to alter or amend judgment pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Weathers v. Moore , No. CA-96- 3720-18BC (D.S.C. May 9 and June 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          7,941 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,487 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0       
<PP&E>                                      2,233,866      
<DEPRECIATION>                                100,041    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,441,977      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0    
<BONDS>                                       860,578  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   257,000 
<COMMON>                                       76,076 
<OTHER-SE>                                    973,883       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,441,977         
<SALES>                                        79,950          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               83,494          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,624          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,133       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,500      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,961       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                40,576       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            40,576      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   40,576 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.53 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.51 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the Companies) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Stephen P. Reynolds, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
               the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:
August 5, 2004                 
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/ Stephen P. Reynolds              
|                                     
|Stephen P. Reynolds                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DAISY FRANCO,

Defendant.

8:23MJ279

ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE

DUE PROCESS PROTECTION ACT

This matter came before the Court for Initial Appearance on a Complaint. The government 

was represented by Mikala Purdy-Steenholdt. The defendant was present and represented by

Justin D. Eichmann. 

IT IS ORDERED:

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' 

obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence as required by Brady v. Maryland, 

373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders the United States to do so. Failure to disclose 

exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited 

to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, 

or sanctions by the Court.

DATED: May 12, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00113-RFR-MDN Doc # 18 Filed: 05/12/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 19