alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,782,652
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      41,834
<MORTGAGE>                                     599,590
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      431
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               7,744,144
<CASH>                                          35,674
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               9,397
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         426,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,630,099
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,207,705
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   6,155
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          313,183
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                146,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          216,729
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,424
<OTHER-SE>                                     792,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,630,999
<PREMIUMS>                                      80,306
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            260,696
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               4,019
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     210,696
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     36,571
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            44,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,548
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,548
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
** **

**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**Officer Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Public Service Company of Colorado(PSCo) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q),each of the undersigned officers of PSCo certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)          The Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of PSCo as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the Form 10-Q.

 

Date: Dec. 17, 2007

 
| /s/ TIM E. TAYLOR                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Tim E. Taylor                               |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                        |
| /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE  III                |   |
| Benjamin G.S. Fowke III                     |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to PSCo and will be retained by PSCo andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52356-52357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Monday, September 15, 2008.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications

[[Page 52357]]

scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 5, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-20989 Filed 9-5-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 714 

To promote accountability and transparency in future executive orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To promote accountability and transparency in future 

executive orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION RESPECTING CERTAIN EXECU4 TIVE ORDERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days before 

6 issuing a qualifying executive order, the President shall 

7 transmit to the Congress, and make publicly available, a 

8 notification with respect to such executive order. Such no9 tification shall contain— 

10 (1) the text of the executive order; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 714 IH

1 (2) the Federal law or laws affected by the ex2 ecutive order that is the subject of the notification; 

3 (3) how the President is working within the pa4 rameters specified in Federal law and the Constitu5 tion; 

6 (4) the means by which the executive order will 

7 be accomplished, including through any related Fed8 eral agencies or departments; and 

9 (5) a comprehensive list of organizations, busi10 nesses, and other parties or entities the President, 

11 or the President’s designee, engaged with prior to 

12 the issuance of such executive order. 

13 (b) REPORTS.—Not later than 6 months after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, and every 12 months 

15 thereafter, the President shall submit to the Congress a 

16 report on the outcome of each qualifying executive order 

17 issued during the period covered by the report. 

18 (c) QUALIFYING EXECUTIVE ORDER.—The term 

19 ‘‘qualifying executive order’’ means any executive order 

20 (including an executive order that revokes or nullifies a 

21 previous executive order) issued on or after January 20, 

22 2021, relating to abortion, including the prohibition on the 

23 use of Federal funds for abortions, as specified in sections 

24 506 and 507 of division H of the Consolidated Appropria25 tions Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–260) (commonly reVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:25 Feb 22, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H714.IH H714

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 714 IH

1 ferred to as the ‘‘Hyde amendment’’), and the right to 

2 life guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitu3 tion. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1534

___________ In re: Sheila Paskel, * * Debtor, * *

---------------------- * * Appeal from the United States U.S. Trustee, * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Thomas Womack, Jr., * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 15, 1998 Filed: July 20, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________The Honorable Mary D. Scott, Uni ted States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Arkansas. The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Easter n 2 District of Arkansas. -2- PER CURIAM. The ba nkruptcy court entered judgment against Thomas Womack, Jr., in a n 1 adversary proceeding. Womack timely appealed, but failed to perfect the appeal i n accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 8006. The bankruptcy court thus referred the case to the district court for such action as it deemed appropriate, under Bankruptcy Rule 2 8001(a). The district court issued a show-cause order affording Womack th e opportunity to explain his failure to perfect the appeal, and warning him that he faced dismissal. Womack & s filing was unresponsive on this issue, and the district cour t dis missed the appeal. Womack now appeals that dismissal. We conclude that th e district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the bankruptcy appeal for failure to perfect it. See In re Fitzsimmons , 920 F.2d 1468, 1470-71 (9th Cir. 1990) (standard of r eview); see also In re Champion , 895 F.2d 490, 492 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-190-01-SM

Mitchell Krasco

ORDER

Re: Document No. 139, Motion to Appoint New Counsel

Ruling: Granted. Although defendant’s motion for replacement

appointed counsel is not well-founded (given the record, his

release on conditions prior to pleading was unlikely, so, his plea

was probably not actually determinative of his detention status,

though the applicable standard did increase in severity as a result

of the plea), still, this is his first request to new counsel, and

under the circumstances it is plausible that the relationship with

current counsel is strained.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: January 30, 2006

cc: Joseph Laplante, Esq.

Jennifer Jones, Esq.

U. S. Probation

U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00190-SM Document 141 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 1
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 The 2010 Annual Revision (440 KB PDF)  Table 6 Rates of change for annual industrial production indexes, 2005-10  Item
Revised rate of change(percent)
Difference between rates of change:revised minus earlier(percentage points)2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010Total IP
3.2
2.2
2.7
-3.3
-9.3
5.7
-.1
.0
1.2
-1.1
.4
...MARKET GROUPConsumer goods
2.7
.6
.8
-4.2
-5.8
4.6
.0
.2
-.2
-1.5
-.7
...Durable
.7
.4
1.8
-10.3
-17.0
11.8
.2
1.4
1.4
-.4
-.1
...Nondurable
3.4
.6
.4
-2.1
-2.4
2.7
-.1
-.2
-.7
-1.6
-.4
...Business equipment
7.2
9.2
4.5
-1.5
-12.2
8.0
.2
-.1
1.9
-.3
.2
...Defense and space equipment
10.4
-1.5
18.3
2.5
1.1
3.6
-.2
.6
14.6
.0
.6
...Construction supplies
4.7
2.4
-1.2
-9.5
-16.7
3.9
.2
.1
.7
-3.2
1.2
...Business supplies
3.1
1.1
1.7
-3.8
-10.1
1.7
-.2
-.1
.4
-.9
.1
...Materials
2.3
2.2
3.7
-2.7
-9.7
6.9
-.1
-.2
1.7
-.8
1.3
...Non-energy
4.0
2.4
4.6
-4.7
-14.3
8.4
-.1
-.3
2.5
-1.0
1.0
...Energy
-1.3
1.7
1.9
.7
-2.1
4.5
.0
.0
.2
-1.1
.7
...INDUSTRY GROUPManufacturing[1]
4.0
2.5
2.9
-4.5
-11.1
6.0
.0
.0
1.5
-1.3
.2
...Manufacturing (NAICS)
4.2
2.7
3.2
-4.4
-10.9
6.5
.0
.0
1.6
-1.3
.2
...Durable manufacturing
5.7
4.6
5.0
-3.6
-14.9
8.9
.3
.2
2.9
-.3
1.6
...Nondurable manufacturing
2.5
.6
1.1
-5.3
-6.0
4.0
-.3
-.3
.2
-2.4
-.4
...Other manufacturing (non-NAICS)
-.4
-1.2
-1.3
-6.5
-14.5
-4.4
.0
-.2
.0
-.9
1.2
...Mining
-1.5
3.0
.5
.8
-5.0
5.7
-.3
-.3
.0
-1.3
1.6
...Utilities
2.1
-.6
3.4
-.1
-2.6
3.5
.0
.0
.0
-.4
-.1
...       Return to table                 Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket Nos. ER08-637-000; ER08-637-001; ER08-637-004; ER08-637-005] 

                    Take notice that on November 12, 2008, a technical conference will be convened to consider issues related to the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.'s proposal to offer Market Coordination Service (Market Service), as discussed in the order issued June 13, 2008 in Docket Nos. ER08-637-000 and ER08-637-001.[1]                                          The technical conference will be held in the Commission Meeting Room at the headquarters of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC, 20426 from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (ET).                 

The technical conference will be divided into two sessions. The morning session will be led by the Commissioners and will address broad policy issues associated with Market Service. The afternoon session will be led by Commission staff and will address certain technical aspects of Market Service. Subsequent notices will be issued regarding the details of this technical conference. 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Midwest Indep. Transmission Sys. Operator, Inc.*, 123 FERC ¶ 61,265, at P 155 (2008).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-21540 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No. 8:00CR55

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

WILLIAM L. MATTAN, )

)

Defendant. )

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Continue (Filing No. 51) is granted. The final

disposition hearing regarding the Petition and Amended Petition for Offender under Supervision

(Filing Nos. 40 and 41) is rescheduled to August 18, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, Third

Floor, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Defendant

must be present in person.

Dated this 7th day of July, 2005.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon 

JOSEPH F. BATAILLON

United States District Judge

8:00-cr-00055-JFB Doc # 52 Filed: 07/07/05 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 38
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1-5 Filed 03/22/04 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1-5 Filed 03/22/04 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1-5 Filed 03/22/04 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1-5 Filed 03/22/04 Page 4 of 4
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1206

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of garlic.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain

entries of garlic.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ENTRIES OF GARLIC.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

5 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro6 vision of law and subject to the provisions of subsection

7 (b), the United States Customs Service shall—

8 (1) not later than 90 days after the receipt of

9 the request described in subsection (b), liquidate or

10 reliquidate as free from duty the entries listed in

11 subsection (c); and
2

•HR 1206 IH

1 (2) not later than 90 days after such liquida2 tion or reliquidation, refund any duties paid with re3 spect to such entries (including interest from the

4 date of entry), including duties paid in June 1999

5 and duties paid on February 8, 2000 (collection re6 ceipt number 543514640).

7 (b) REQUESTS.—Liquidation or reliquidation may be

8 made under subsection (a) with respect to an entry de9 scribed in subsection (c) only if a request therefor is filed

10 with the Customs Service not later than 90 days after the

11 date of the enactment of this Act.

12 (c) ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in subsection

13 (a) are as follows:

Entry Number Entry Date

D01–0625672–6 .................................................... July 11, 1996

D01–0625917–5 .................................................... July 16, 1996

D01–0627368–9 .................................................... August 28, 1996

D01–0628353–0 ....................................................September 25, 1996

D01–0625585–7 .................................................... October 2, 1996

D01–0625913–1 .................................................... October 9, 1996

D01–0629659–9 .................................................... October 28, 1996

D01–0625730–8 .................................................... October 30, 1996

D01–0625817–3 .................................................... November 1, 1996

D01–0625889–2 .................................................... November 5, 1996

D01–0625971–8 .................................................... November 6, 1996

D01–0630020–1 .................................................... November 8, 1996

D01–0630294–2 ....................................................November 18, 1996

D01–0630977–2 .................................................... December 4, 1996

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135403 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135403 COA: 279114 Oakland CC: 92-121606-FC 92-121607-FC; 92-121608-FC 92-121934-FC; 92-121935-FC 92-121936-FC; 92-121937-FC 92-121938-FC; 92-121941-FC

HOWARD JAY KAPLAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

d0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
#### LOPEZ v. MECHANICS & TRADERS INS. CO. OF NEW ORLEANS, LA. SAME v. STATE ASSUR. CO., LIMITED, OF LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

Aug. 6, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1936.

*671Caraballo, Graham & Cosio, of Tampa, for plaintiff in error.

Mabry, Reaves, Carlton & White, of Tampa, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

The pleadings and the evidence in these two cases are identical. The defendants below, defendants in error here, are different. The plaintiff brought an action at law against the defendants to recover on fire insurance policies issued to the owner who mortgaged the property insured to the plaintiff. The declarations allege that the plaintiff is a mortgagee from the owner of the property and that he is protected by the New York standard mortgage clause. The declaration alleges the destruction of the building by fire, proofs of loss, and the nonpayment of the claim.

The defendants by separate pleas denied that plaintiff held a bona fide mortgage from the owner, alleged that the mortgage was a sham, and that the buildings were intentionally burned with the consent of the plaintiff. A motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the testimony was overruled and the jury returned a verdict for the defendants. A motion for new trial was denied, final judgment was entered, and the plaintiff took writ of error to this court.

Error is assigned on denial of the motion for a directed verdict and for overruling the motion for a new trial. It is admitted that the fire was of incendiary origin. This admission left the issue of whether or not the plaintiff had guilty knowledge of the fire and whether or not the mortgage was a sham or was bona fide.

This was a clear issue of fact for the jury. We have examined the evidence carefully, and it amply supports the verdict and judgment. We have read briefs of counsel and note their contention, but we find nothing in the record that would warrant us in setting the judgment aside.

It is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgments.
Order entered January 31 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00528

- CV

IN RE AMY HAGEN , Relator

O riginal Proceeding from the 469th Judicial District C ourt

Coll in County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469

- 54042

- 2016

O RDER Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator ’ s petition for

writ of mandamus.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE