alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1166

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent appropriation

for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisidiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To modify the provision of law which provides a permanent

appropriation for the compensation of Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Pay For

5 Performance Act’’.
2

•HR 1166 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PERMANENT APPROPRIATION

2 FOR MEMBERS’ PAY.

3 Subsection (c) of section 130 of the joint resolution

4 entitled ‘‘Joint resolution making continuing appropria5 tions for the fiscal year 1982, and for other purposes’’

6 (Public Law 97–51; 2 U.S.C. 31 note) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(c) Effective’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), effec9 tive’’; and

10 (2) by adding at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(2) If Congress has not passed all general appro12 priation bills before the beginning of a fiscal year, then

13 the appropriation contained in paragraph (1) shall not be

14 effective with respect to such fiscal year.’’.

15 SEC. 3. CONSIDERATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH AP16 PROPRIATION.

17 It shall not be in order in either the House of Rep18 resentatives or the Senate to consider the general appro19 priation bill making appropriations for the legislative

20 branch for any fiscal year unless and until all other gen21 eral appropriation bills for such fiscal year have been pre22 sented to the President for signature under section 7 of

23 article I of the Constitution of the United States.

Æ
8:00-cr-00063-RGK-FG3 Doc # 30 Filed: 05/29/03 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 32
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jeffrey Winston Forrest

, * From the 350 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 11750

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 062

- CR * March 2 , 20 2 3

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment s below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment s of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FERNANDO AGUIRRE-QUINTERO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 8:23CR106

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [27]. 

Counsel needs additional time to negotiate a resolution short of trial. For good cause 

shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [27] is granted, as 

follows:

1. The jury trial now set for November 27, 2023, is continued to January 29, 

2024.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests 

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising 

as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s 

date and January 29, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any 

computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to 

grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for 

effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

DATED: November 17, 2023.

 BY THE COURT:

s/ Susan M. Bazis

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00106-RFR-SMB Doc # 28 Filed: 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 44
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joshua Manning

v. Civil No. 05-cv-369-SM

Larry Blaisdell, Warden,

Northern New Hampshire

Correctional Facility

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 31, 2006, no objection having been filed. The case is

hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

March 16, 2006 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Sven D. Wiberg, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00369-SM Document 13 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 1
The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior District Judge for the U.S. *

District Court for Alaska, sitting by designation.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROBERTO BUSTOS-OCHOA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-50471

D.C. No. 

3:10-cr-04188-DMS-1

Southern District of

California, San Diego

ORDER

Filed April 22, 2013

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson and Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain,

Circuit Judges, and James K. Singleton, Senior District

Judge.*

ORDER

The opinion filed in this case on December 18, 2012 is

hereby amended as follows:

On page 5 of the slip opinion, lines 29–32, delete the

following citation: “See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a)(1) (noting that

aliens deportable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(1)(2)(A)(iii)—the

aggravated felony statute—are not eligible for voluntary
2 UNITED STATES V. BUSTOS-OCHOA

departure).” Replace this citation with the following: “See

8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(b)(1) (noting that aliens who have “been

convicted of a crime described in section 101(a)(43) of the

Act”—the section defining aggravated felonies—are not

eligible for voluntary departure);see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(e)

(“The Attorney General may by regulation limit eligibility for

voluntary departure under this section for any class or classes

of aliens.”).”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the

petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The panel has

voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge

O’Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en

banc, and Judges Nelson and Singleton have so

recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition

for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on

whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en

banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or

for rehearing en banc will be entertained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Shunsky, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 18, 2005

                                              /s/ Vincent Shunsky
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Vincent Shunsky
                                              Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 02-07-136-CV

ROBERT T. "BOB" CLIFTON	APPELLANT

	V.

JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY,                                       APPELLEE

CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS	

	------------

	FROM THE 362ND COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On April 25, 2007 and May 22, 2007, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED:  June 21, 2007
**
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.’s 333-238922 and 333-254361 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-257684 on Form S-3 of ourreport dated February 28, 2022 relating to the financial statements of Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. and the effectiveness of Pliant Therapeutics, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2021. 

 
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Francisco, California 

February 28, 2022 
**
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1131

To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr.

MATHESON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under

the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C.

2210 note).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION TRUST

4 FUND APPROPRIATIONS.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

6 ‘‘Paul Hicks Memorial Act’’.

7 (b) APPROPRIATIONS.—There are appropriated, out

8 of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,
2

•HR 1131 IH

1 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and each

2 fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary to

3 the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund for the

4 purpose of making payments to eligible beneficiaries under

5 the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C.

6 2210 note).

Æ
Exhibit 35.4  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Fl
401 South Tryon Street Charlotte,
NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 29, 2018, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase
Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as Trustee, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-AVM (the Agreement).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 13.7 of
this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June 29, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie HaytonManaging DirectorWells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 *

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
--------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     November 14, 2006

<FN>
*    A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
     Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to
     the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. Civil No. 05-cv-293-JD

Manchester Police Department, et al.

O R D E R

Pro se plaintiff William J. Carey has filed a complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging claims for malicious

prosecution under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the

United States Constitution and claims of defamation, tortious

interference with contractual relations and intentional

interference with prospective contractual relations under New

Hampshire law (document no. 1). Seeking monetary relief, he

brings this action against the Manchester Police Department

(“MPD”) and MPD employees Detectives Steven Olson and Peter

Bartlett and Officer Michael Boufford. 

The complaint is before me for preliminary review to

determine whether, among other things, it states a claim upon

which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; U.S.

District Court for the District of New Hampshire Local Rule

Case 1:05-cv-00293-JD Document 8 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 3
2

(“LR”) 4.3(d)(2). For the reasons stated in the report and

recommendation issued simultaneously herewith, I find that he has

alleged Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claims against

Olson and Boufford. I have recommended dismissal of all

remaining claims.

Accordingly, I order that the complaint be served on the

defendants. The Clerk’s Office is instructed to prepare the

summonses for each defendant and deliver to the United States

Marshal for the District of New Hampshire (“U.S. Marshal’s

Office”) the summonses and copies of the complaint (document no.

1), the report and recommendation and this order. Upon receipt

of the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s Office shall

effect service upon defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2).

Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead within twenty

days of acceptance of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

Case 1:05-cv-00293-JD Document 8 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 3
3

their attorneys, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 17, 2006

cc: William J. Carey, pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00293-JD Document 8 Filed 01/17/06 Page 3 of 3
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1197

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian

Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to decrease the requisite blood quantum

required for membership in the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. REYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and

Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to

decrease the requisite blood quantum required for membership in the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIRED FOR TRIBAL

4 MEMBERSHIP DECREASED.

5 Section 108(a)(2)(i) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and

6 Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restora-
2

•HR 1197 IH

tion Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-7) is amended by striking ‘‘1 1 ⁄8’’

and inserting ‘‘1 2 ⁄16’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.1

The Trustee and Unitholders
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust:

Re: Registration Statements Nos. 333-89164 (Form S-3) and 333-103952 (Form S-3).

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 18, 2003, related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report
is not considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by
an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
August 7, 2003
EXHIBIT
        32.1
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Maxco, Inc. (the
        “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Max A. Coon, as Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
        as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        This
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: 
                  April 3, 2006/s/ Max
                  A.
                  CoonMax
                  A. CoonChief
                  Executive Officer
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
          and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 25
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.33

                                  March 3, 2005

Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc.
850 E. Algonquin Road, Suite 100
Schaumburg, IL 60173
Attention: Scott P. Pettit

Dear Scott:

            Reference is hereby made to that certain Second Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement dated as of March 19, 2004 by and among the Insurance Auto
Auctions, Inc. (the "Borrower"), the financial institutions party from time to
time thereto as Lenders (the "Lenders"), the financial institutions party from
time to time thereto as LC Issuers (the "LC Issuers") and LaSalle Bank National
Association, as administrative agent (the "Administrative Agent") (as the same
may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time,
the "Credit Agreement"). Terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings set forth in the Credit Agreement.

            The Borrower has informed the Administrative Agent and the Lenders
that a Default has occurred or is expected to occur as a result of the
Borrower's noncompliance with the Capital Expenditures, Acquisitions and Stock
Repurchases financial covenant set forth in Section 6.19.4 of the Credit
Agreement for Fiscal Year 2004 (the "Specified Default"). In accordance with the
provisions of Section 8.2 of the Credit Agreement, the Borrower has requested
that the Lenders waive the Specified Default.

<PAGE>

            The Lenders hereby agree to such waiver.

                                Very truly yours,

                                LASALLE BANK NATIONAL
                                ASSOCIATION, as Administrative Agent, as an
                                LC Issuer and as a Lender

                                By: /s/ John C. Thurston
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Name: John C. Thurston
                                    Title: Senior Vice President

                                BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as an LC Issuer
                                and as a Lender

                                By: /s/ Craig W. McGuire
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Name: Craig W. McGuire
                                    Title: Senior Vice President

                                NATIONAL CITY BANK OF THE
                                MIDWEST, as an LC Issuer and as a Lender

                                By: /s/ Michael L. Monniger
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Name: Michael L. Monniger
                                    Title: Vice President

WAIVER LETTER DATED AS OF MARCH 2005