alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XK46


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Crab 
Socioeconomic Data Collection Committee will meet in Anchorage, AK.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 30, 2008, at 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Howard Rock A Ballroom, at 
the Sheraton,401 East 6th Avenue, Anchorage, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Fina, North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council; telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The committee will discuss the collection of 
social and economic fisheries data, and potential analytical uses of 
those data. These data include revenue, cost, crew, labor, and 
community information, which may be collected from vessels and 
processing plants participating in the fisheries, as well as data from 
other sources.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 
those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this 
meeting. Actions will be restricted to those issues specifically 
identified in this notice and any issues arising after publication of 
this notice that require emergency action under Section 305 (c) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the 
Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Gail Bendixen, (907) 271-2809, at least 5 working 
days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: September 10, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-21401 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BYRON CALDERON,

Appellant, §

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00361

- CV

Appeal from the

384th District Court

v.

YP ADVERTISING, L.P.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§ of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013 DCV 0539)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order c osts of the appeal are taxed against the party incurring

same , and this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report
of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service
Electric and Gas Company.


                                   /s/ E. James Ferland
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   E. James Ferland
                                   Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   July 30, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IRENE CARBAJAL

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 081

- CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 2

of El Paso County, Texas

( TC# 20170C10979 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25 TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019.

TERRY JENNINGS, Senior Judge

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., an d Jennings, Senior Judge

Jennings, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21850]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 24-2008]


Foreign-Trade Zone 161 - Sedgwick County, Kansas

Amendment to Application for Subzone Status

Hawker Beechcraft Corporation

(Aircraft Manufacturing)

Wichita and Salina, Kansas

    A request has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) by Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (HBC) to amend the company's 
application requesting special-purpose subzone status for the company's 
aircraft manufacturing facilities located in Wichita and Salina, 
Kansas.
    HBC is now requesting to include additional finished products in 
the company's requested scope of authority. The additional finished 
products will be manufactured using the same imported parts and 
components (duty-free to 15 percent) as described in the original 
Federal Register notice (73 FR 21903-21904, 4/23/08). The additional 
finished products (duty-free) are as follows: propellers, rotors and 
parts thereof (8803.10); undercarriages and parts thereof (8803.20); 
and, other parts of airplanes (8803.30).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address listed below. The closing period for their 
receipt is October 20, 2008. Rebuttal comments in response to material 
submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the 
subsequent 15-day period (to November 3, 2008).
    A copy of the application amendment and accompanying exhibits will 
be available at each of the following addresses: U. S. Department of 
Commerce Export Assistance Center, 150 North Main Street, Suite 200, 
Wichita, Kansas; and, Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board, Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20230. For further information contact 
Christopher Kemp at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f4c475d465c5b405f474a5d70444a425f6f465b4e014b404c01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b7bca6bda7a0bba4bcb1a68bbfb1b9a494bda0b5fab0bbb7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0862.

    Dated: September 4, 2008.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21850 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Manuel Raul MONTERO, a/k/a Reyo Pena Garcia, a/k/a Reyes Pena, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Jefferson CLINTON, Former President, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-6774.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.

Decided Aug. 21, 2003.

*284Manuel Raul Montero, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Manuel Raul Montero seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint for failure to comply with a court order and denying reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order denying reconsideration was entered on the docket on March 3, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on May 5, 2003. Because Montero failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

WENDY MARIE PIERSON,

Petitioner, 

vs. 

STATE COURT,

Respondent.

8:23CV186

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On July 11, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to update her address with the Court

within 30 days or face dismissal of this action. Filing No. 11. To date, Plaintiff has not 

updated her address or taken any other action in this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice 

because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this Court’s 

orders. The Court will enter judgment by a separate document.

Dated this 3rd day of January, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00186-JFB-PRSE Doc # 13 Filed: 01/03/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 56
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

TERRANCE ADRIAN LACEY,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MARK OVERMAN, in His Official Capacity 

as Sheriff of Scottsbluff Nebraska;

Defendant.

8:23CV194

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Terrance Adrian Lacey, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to 

Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Filing No. 6. Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court 

finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is 

granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised 

that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his 

claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 19th day of May, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon

Senior United States District Judge

8:23-cv-00194-JFB-PRSE Doc # 7 Filed: 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 25
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
Rand Capital Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 7, 2020 |                               
|--------------------- | ------------------------------
|                      | /s/ Allen F. Grum             
|                      | Allen F. Grum, President      
|                      | (Chief Executive Officer)     
|Dated: August 7, 2020 |                               
|                      | /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy       
|                      | Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer
|                      | (Chief Financial Officer)
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00152

- CR

GAVIN HEATH GILBERT, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 1826694

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a bir th date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record and volumes one through nine of the reporter’s record contain the names of persons who were minors a t the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record and volumes one through nine of the reporter’s record contain sensi tive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and volumes one through nine of the reporter’s record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: February 7 , 2019
1 Rather than setting out individual claims, count by count,

the complaint weaves together various bits and pieces of federal

and state statutory and common law.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

John J. Shaughnessy,

v. Civil No. 05-cv-149-SM

Opinion No. 2005 DNH 147

Donald P. Bliss and

The State of New Hampshire,

O R D E R

John Shaughnessy has sued Donald Bliss and the State of New

Hampshire for alleged violation of his federal rights. 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. Of the causes of action suggested in his complaint,1 all

but one – a due process claim – are facially without merit. 

Plaintiff asserts that his due process rights were violated by

the manner in which he was discharged from his public employment

and, in particular, by defendants’ failure to utilize the full

multi-step disciplinary process described in the State of New

Hampshire’s personnel rules.

Case 1:05-cv-00149-SM Document 6 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 3
2

The facts alleged in the complaint do not support a claim

for violation of plaintiff’s right to due process. Under the

circumstances alleged by plaintiff, he “was entitled to the

constitutional minimum of ‘some kind of hearing’ and ‘some

pretermination opportunity to respond.’” O’Neill v. Baker, 210

F.3d 41, 47 (1st Cir. 2000) (quoting Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v.

Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 (1985)) (footnote omitted). More

specifically, “[t]he pre-termination process ‘need only include

oral or written notice of the charges, an explanation of the

employer’s evidence, and an opportunity for the employee to tell

his side of the story.” O’Neill, 210 F.3d at 48 (quoting Gilbert

v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924, 929 (1997)). 

Defendant Bliss’s April 29, 2002, memorandum to plaintiff

(attached to the complaint) and the April 30, 2002, meeting

between Bliss and plaintiff (as described in paragraphs 27 and 28

of the complaint) meet the requirement described in O’Neill. The

April 29 memorandum informed plaintiff that the charges against

him were based upon an e-mail he sent to Kevin Merli on April 26,

2002. At the meeting, plaintiff was informed that he was being

charged with insubordination, and he presented his side of the

Case 1:05-cv-00149-SM Document 6 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 3
3

story. Because the complaint and the documents annexed thereto

demonstrate that plaintiff was afforded all the pretermination

process to which he was entitled, it does not state a claim for

deprivation of his federal constitutional right to due process.

For the reasons given, and those argued in defendants’

motion to dismiss, the motion (document no. 3) is granted. The

clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance with this

order and close the case. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

October 24, 2005

cc: John J. Shaughnessy, pro se

Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00149-SM Document 6 Filed 10/24/05 Page 3 of 3
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11416 and #11417]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of North Carolina dated 09/04/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/26/2008 through 08/27/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         09/04/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/03/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/04/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road,   Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,  U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Cabarrus, Mecklenburg. Contiguous Counties: North Carolina:  Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Rowan, Stanly, Union. South Carolina:  Lancaster, York. The Interest Rates are: Percent*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere*
5.750*Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
2.875*Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere*
8.000*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere*
5.250*Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11416 B and for economic injury is 114170.
 The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are North Carolina, South Carolina. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 4, 2008. Sandy K. Baruah, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. E8-21270 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

y0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

142294 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142294 

 COA: 294287 

Wayne CC: 95-007158-FC 

JASUBHAI KESHUBHAI DESAI, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Report on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.



|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/Edward Munden
Edward Munden
President & Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

















---