alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-283-01-B

Kevin Thompson

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the February 7, 2006

trial in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional

time to review recently received discovery materials. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial

from February 7, 2006 to May 2, 2006. In agreeing to continue

the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00283-PB Document 11 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The January 30, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

until April 20, 2006 at 2:30 pm.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

Chief Judge

January 30, 2006

cc: Michael Shklar, Esq.

Mark Irish, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00283-PB Document 11 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.46





AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO THE NONEXCLUSIVE VALUE ADDED DISTRIBUTOR AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 13 ("the Amendment") to the Nonexclusive Value Added Distributor Agreement by and between ScanSource, Inc. ("Distributor"), a South Carolina corporation with a place of business at 6 Logue Court, Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, and Cisco Systems, Inc., a California corporation having its principal place of business at 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 ("Cisco"), is effective as of the date of last signature below (the "Amendment Effective Date"). All capitalized terms contained herein shall have the same meaning as the terms defined in the Agreement unless specifically modified in this Amendment.


WHEREAS, Cisco and Distributor previously entered into a Nonexclusive Value Added Distributor Agreement dated January 22, 2007, as amended (the "Agreement"); and


WHEREAS, Cisco and Distributor desire to delete Exhibit D ("ScanSource Freight Policy") and update Exhibit E ("Affiliate List") of the Agreement;


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged by all of the parties to this Amendment, Cisco and Distributor hereby represent, covenant and agree as follows:


1. Exhibit D ("ScanSource Freight Policy") is hereby deleted in its entirety and any reference to it in the Agreement shall no longer apply as of the Amendment Effective Date.


2. Exhibit E ("Affiliate List") is hereby replaced in its entirety by Appendix 1 attached hereto.


3. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered will be an original and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile signatures and electronic signatures will be deemed to be equivalent to original signatures for purposes of this Amendment.


4. All other terms of the Agreement remain the same. Capitalized terms in the Amendment shall have the same meaning as those terms have in the Agreement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-99-01-SM

Marcelo Moraes

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 10) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the February 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than November 27, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00099-SM Document 11 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: January 29, 2006 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: February 6, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

November 21, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Robert Kinsella, Esq.

 Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00099-SM Document 11 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 41 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-145531) and Amendment No. 500 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763),
      and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and
      (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N For Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

     

    

     

    

                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP        

      

              

      

     

    

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    August 22, 2019
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2018, by and among WELLS FARGOCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C47 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.             Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.             To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7324** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ALOYSIUS JAMEGO BER MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cr - 00259

- RBH

- 9 )

Submitted : November 1 9 , 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
M cLaughlin , No. 4:14

- cr - 00259

- RBH

- 9 (D.S.C., Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM ED
#### Munson HICKMAN v. NEEB KEARNEY & CO., Inc. and The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York.

No. 20327.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 28, 1955.

Claude F. Kammer, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

JANVIER, Judge.

In this suit the plaintiff, Munson Hickman, prays for judgment for compensation at $30 per week for 400 weeks alleging that he is permanently totally disabled. In the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans the suit was dismissed and plaintiff has appealed.

The matter now comes before us on motion of' plaintiff-appellant that it be remanded to the Civil District Court in order that there may be introduced evidence which plaintiff says was not available at the time of the trial in the District Court and which indicates that the condition of plaintiff-appellant has grown worse since the trial. It is suggested that, if the matter b.e remanded, there will be introduced certain hospital records and the testimony of Dr. Arthur Houston and certain photographs which will indicate that, on one of the hands of plaintiff, there has recurred a ganglion which was not present when the case was tried in the District Court.

Dr. Houston testified at great length on the first trial and was plainly of the opinion that plaintiff, prior to the occurrence of the accident on which this suit is based, had had a ganglion which had been surgically removed.

In the letter of Dr. Houston, which was written to counsel for plaintiff after the trial below and which is attached to the motion to remand, Dr. Houston expresses the opinion that there has been a recurrence or re-appearance of the ganglion which had previously been surgically removed. A review of the testimony of Dr. Houston leaves the very distinct impression that he was of the opinion that the ganglion had not been caused by the accident on which this suit is based.

It is also made rather clear from the letter of Dr. Houston that he very carefully refrained from stating that, as a result of the re-appearance of the ganglion, plaintiff has been disabled.

Even if Dr. Houston were given the opportunity to again testify and even if *235the photographs and the hospital records were introduced, in our opinion they would show no more than that the ganglion, which had not been caused by the accident, had re-appeared and that the accident had no causal connection with its re-appearance. We do not see that the additional evidence would add to or detract from that which was previously offered.

We well realize that, especially in compensation cases, every opportunity should be afforded for the introduction of any evidence which may be of assistance to the Court in arriving at a proper conclusion. However, this does not mean that every time an attorney believes that he should have asked additional questions of witnesses, who have already testified at length, the case should be re-opened or remanded in order that he may be given the opportunity to ask such additional questions of the same witness.

No useful purpose would be served by remanding the matter. The motion to remand is overruled.

Motion overruled.
Exhibit 32.a  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Report on Form 10-QSB for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.  Dated: November 14, 2006/s/Edward Munden
Edward Munden
President & Chief Executive Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Diego Lorenzo

v. Case No. 06-cv-474-PB

Kiwi Brands

O R D E R

Re: Document No. 54, Joint Assented to Motion to 

Certify Class and Preliminarily Approve Settlement

Ruling: Granted. The parties shall consult with the clerk

and identify an acceptable date for a hearing. They shall then

file a proposed order indicating the court’s preliminary approval

of the settlement, specifying the means by which notice shall be

given, disclosing the date for the hearing on final approval, and

identifying a date by which opt-outs and objections should be made.

The date by which objections must be filed shall be no earlier than

30 days after the date by which the parties expect that notice will

be completed. 

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

District Judge

Date: June 10, 2006

cc: Courtney Quinn Brooks, Esq.

Paul B. Kleinman, Esq.

Joseph J. Leighorn, Esq.

Patrick F. Morris, Esq.

W. Scott O’Connell, Esq.

Case 1:02-cv-00474-PB Document 57 Filed 06/10/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 06-cr-79-PB

Dorothy Collins, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the October 3, 2006

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

conduct discovery on the superseding indictment and prepare a

defense. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from October 3, 2006 to January 9, 2007. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:06-cr-00079-PB Document 47 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on December

18, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 29, 2006

cc: Debra Walsh, AUSA

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Michael Ramsdell, Esq.

Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Richard Monteith, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:06-cr-00079-PB Document 47 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (10)(a)

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

  

  

  

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171096) and Amendment No. 507 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity
    Company of New York and (b) April 16, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N For Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

  

  

               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  

  

  

  

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  August 22, 2019
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cash Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended November 30, 2008 and 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being,
Bruce Korman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edmund King, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:
      January 20, 2009/s/
      Bruce Korman
                  
                  /s/
      Edmund KingChief
      Executive Officer
                  
                  Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Cash Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Cash Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Knowles

v. Case No. 05-cv-363-PB

NH Department of Corrections

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated April 12, 2006, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

May 15, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: William Knowles, pro se

NH Attorney General

Case 1:05-cv-00363-JL Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.26


 


 


May 26, 2017


 


 


 


Adam Pliska


CEO/President


WPT Enterprises, Inc.


1920 Main Street, Suite 1150


Irvine, California 92614


 


		Re:	World Poker Tour Season Fifteen etc. – Exception to Exclusive Rights



 


Dear Adam:


 


We refer to the agreements, dated as of
May 10, 2013 (as amended) and May 24, 2016 (collectively the “Agreements”), and the Exception to Exclusive Rights letter
agreement dated as of August 29, 2016 (the “Letter”) between WPT Enterprises, Inc. (“WPTE”) and National
Sports Programming (“Fox”), pursuant to which Fox will distribute episodes of the World Poker Tour television series.
Any defined terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the applicable Agreement.


 


WPTE and Fox hereby agree that the Letter
shall be restated and replaced with this letter agreement and that Section 8 of Exhibit A of each Agreement shall be amended by
inserting the following paragraph (i) after the fourth full paragraph of Section 8 of Exhibit A of the May 10, 2013 Agreement,
and (ii) after subparagraph 8(b) as a new subparagraph (8(b1) in Section 8 of Exhibit A of the May 24, 2016 Agreement:


 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing
exclusive Telecast rights, WPTE shall have the right to offer for Telecast all Episodes of each season of the (Tour) Series on
a subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) and an advertising video-on-demand (AVOD) basis on World Poker Tour-branded applications
powered by Zype delivered to OTT enabled devices (e.g., Roku, Apple TV) beginning one week after Fox premieres the final Episode
of such season. Once initially available pursuant to the preceding sentence, WPTE shall not be required to restrict the availability
of Episodes on such applications on dates that Fox premieres the then current season of the (Tour) Series (i.e., currently Sunday
nights). WPTE agrees and acknowledges that Fox shall have the right to revoke such AVOD rights with written notice to WPTE.”


 


Except as set forth herein, the Agreement
will not otherwise be changed, altered or amended and remains in full force and effect. This letter agreement, together with the
Agreements, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the Agreements.
If the above confirms your understanding, please signify your acceptance by signing below.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


NATIONAL SPORTS PROGRAMMING


 


 


By: _________________________


Name: _______________________


Title: ________________________


 


Agreed and Accepted by:


 


WPT ENTERPRISES, INC.


 


By: _________________________


Name: _______________________


Title: ________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

On September 11, 2008, the Commission issued a Notice pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b, announcing the agenda for the Commission's open meeting to be held on September 18, 2008.

Take notice that the docket numbers for the item listed as “E-25” are revised to read as follows:

E-25; RM06-16-004 and RR08-1-001.

A corrected version of the Sunshine Notice for the September 18, 2008 open meeting will be posted in the Commission's eLibrary system and the Commission's Web site.

This Notice is issued pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. Chairman Kelliher, Commissioners Kelly, Spitzer, Moeller and Wellinghoff, voted to issue this notice on September 12, 2008.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-21869 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P