53046 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices 

TA–W–63,412; Pfizer, Inc, 

Conshohocken, PA. 

TA–W–63,803; MIG Wire and Tube, LLC, 

Chattanooga, TN. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–63,699; England, Inc., 

Morristown, TN. 

TA–W–63,707; Alcoa, Inc., Rockdale, 

TX. 

TA–W–63,716; Woodbridge Corporation, 

Brodhead, WI. 

TA–W–63,785; American Woodmark, 

Ham Lake, MN. 

TA–W–63,800; Columbia Falls 

Aluminum Company, LLC, 

Columbia Falls, MT. 

TA–W–63,853; Red Sheld 

Environmental, LLC, Old Town, ME. 

TA–W–63,909; Auxora, Inc., Baldwin 

Park, CA. 

TA–W–63,708; ABB Reliability Services, 

Full Service, Working at 

International Paper, Mansfield, LA. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–63,845; Monster Cable Products, 

Distribution Center, Inventory & 

Quality Control, Brisbane, CA. 

TA–W–63,886; Geo Specialty Chemicals, 

Rubber and Plastics Division, 

Gibbstown, NJ. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of August 25 through August 29, 2008. 

Copies of these determinations are available 

for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during 

normal business hours or will be mailed to 

persons who write to the above address. 

Dated: September 4, 2008. 

Erin FitzGerald, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8–21320 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than September 22, 2008. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, at the address 

shown below, not later than September 

22, 2008. 

The petitions filed in this case are 

available for inspection at the Office of 

the Director, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, U.S. 

Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

September 2008. 

Erin Fitzgerald, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

APPENDIX

[TAA petitions instituted between 8/25/08 and 8/29/08] 

TA–W Subject firm 

(petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of 

petition 

63924 ............ Boise Cascade, LLC (AFL–CIO) .................................................... La Grande, OR .................... 08/25/08 08/20/08 

63925 ............ Hutchinson FTS (Comp) ................................................................. Byrdstown, TN ..................... 08/25/08 08/22/08 

63926 ............ Veyance Technologies, Inc. (Comp) .............................................. Fairlawn, OH ....................... 08/25/08 08/22/08 

63927 ............ Delfingen US, Inc. (Comp) ............................................................. El Paso, TX ......................... 08/25/08 06/24/08 

63928 ............ Norandal USA, Inc. (Comp) ............................................................ Salisbury, NC ...................... 08/25/08 08/22/08 

63929 ............ Superior Industries International Incorporated (Comp) .................. Pittsburg, KS ....................... 08/25/08 08/22/08 

63930 ............ Liberty Molds, Inc. (State) .............................................................. Portage, MI .......................... 08/25/08 08/22/08 

63931 ............ Melco Engraving (State) ................................................................. Rochester Hills, MI .............. 08/25/08 08/21/08 

63932 ............ Irving Forest Products/Pinkham Saw Mill (Union) .......................... Fort Kent, ME ...................... 08/25/08 08/21/08 

63933 ............ Upoc Networks, Inc./Administaff Companies (State) ..................... New York, NY ..................... 08/25/08 08/19/08 

63934 ............ SMI Global Corporation (State) ...................................................... Bellevue, WA ....................... 08/26/08 08/25/08 

63935 ............ Kellwood Company (State) ............................................................. Chesterfield, MO ................. 08/27/08 08/18/08 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices 53047 

APPENDIX—Continued 

[TAA petitions instituted between 8/25/08 and 8/29/08] 

TA–W Subject firm 

(petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of 

petition 

63936 ............ EPT (Comp) .................................................................................... Maysville, KY ....................... 08/27/08 08/26/08 

63937 ............ Escalade Sports, Inc. (IUECWA) .................................................... Evansville, IN ...................... 08/27/08 08/25/08 

63938 ............ Parker Hosiery Company, Inc. (Comp) .......................................... Old Fort, NC ........................ 08/27/08 08/25/08 

63939 ............ Hewlett Packard/Technology Development Organization (Wkrs) .. Corvallis, OR ....................... 08/27/08 08/26/08 

63940 ............ Diebold, Inc. (Wkrs) ........................................................................ Lexington, NC ..................... 08/27/08 08/25/08 

63941 ............ General Motors (State) ................................................................... Doraville, GA ....................... 08/27/08 08/26/08 

63942 ............ Mega Building Systems (Wkrs) ...................................................... Springfield, MO ................... 08/27/08 08/25/08 

63943 ............ Dana Holding Corporation, Sealing Products Grp (Comp) ............ Paris, TN ............................. 08/27/08 08/13/08 

63944 ............ Norma Products (US), Inc. (Wkrs) ................................................. Wixom, MI ........................... 08/27/08 08/19/08 

63945 ............ Beiersdorf (Comp) .......................................................................... Mariemont, OH .................... 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63946 ............ Rayloc—Morganfield (Wkrs) ........................................................... Morganfield, KY ................... 08/28/08 08/14/08 

63947 ............ Rayloc—Payson (Wkrs) .................................................................. Payson, UT ......................... 08/28/08 08/14/08 

63948 ............ Kulp Foundry (Comp) ..................................................................... East Stroudsburg, PA ......... 08/28/08 08/19/08 

63949 ............ Casco Group, Inc. (State) ............................................................... Cerritos, CA ......................... 08/28/08 08/25/08 

63950 ............ Howmet Corporation (Union) .......................................................... Whitehall, MI ....................... 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63951 ............ CFM U.S. Corporation (Comp) ....................................................... Huntington, IN ..................... 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63952 ............ Intel Corporation (Comp) ................................................................ Rio Rancho, NM .................. 08/28/08 08/20/08 

63953 ............ Katahdin Paper Company, LLC (Comp) ........................................ Millinocket, ME .................... 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63954 ............ Flextronics (Wkrs) ........................................................................... Charlotte, NC ...................... 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63955 ............ South Company, Inc. (Wkrs) .......................................................... Concordville, PA .................. 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63956 ............ Cooper Standard Automotive (UAW) ............................................. Gaylord, MI .......................... 08/28/08 08/22/08 

63957 ............ Phillips Plastics Corporation (Wkrs) ............................................... Medford, WI ......................... 08/28/08 08/27/08 

63958 ............ American Parts and Services, Inc. (Comp) .................................... Schaumburg, IL ................... 08/29/08 08/28/08 

63959 ............ KOH Defense Systems, Inc. (Wkrs) ............................................... Johnstown, Pa ..................... 08/29/08 08/28/08 

63960 ............ Peoploungers (Comp) ..................................................................... Mantachie, MS .................... 08/29/08 08/28/08 

[FR Doc. E8–21319 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–63,516] 

Morlite/Vista Lighting, Genlyte Group, 

Erie, PA; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated August 19, 2008, 

a worker requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

negative determination regarding 

eligibility for workers and former 

workers of Morlite/Vista Lighting, 

Genlyte Group, Erie, Pennsylvania to 

apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 

(TAA) and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). 

The negative determination was 

issued on July 15, 2008. The 

Department’s Notice of negative 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on July 30, 2008 (73 FR 

44284). The workers at Morlite/Vista 

Lighting, Genlyte Group, Erie, 

Pennsylvania (subject facility) produce 

commercial light fixtures for the 

security and healthcare industries, and 

are not separately identifiable by 

product line. 

The petition was denied because sales 

and production at the subject facility 

increased in 2007 when compared with 

2006 and increased from January 

through May 2008 when compared with 

the corresponding period in 2007. The 

initial investigation also revealed that 

Morlite/Vista Lighting (subject firm) did 

not shift production of commercial light 

fixtures from the subject facility to a 

foreign country during the relevant 

period. 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

administrative reconsideration may be 

granted under the following 

circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

worker asserts that the shift of 

production from Tupelo, Mississippi to 

China enabled the subject firm to shift 

production from Erie, Pennsylvania to 

Tupelo, Mississippi, and thereby caused 

the workers’ separations. 

To certify a worker group for TAA on 

a shift of production basis, the 

Department must find that there has 

been a shift in production by the 

workers’ firm or appropriate subdivision 

to a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

are produced by the workers’ firm or 

subdivision. 

A shift of production of flange kits 

from the subject firm’s Tupelo, 

Mississippi facility to a foreign country 

is not the same as a shift of production 

of commercial light fixtures from the 

subject firm’s Erie, Pennsylvania facility 

to a foreign country. Flange kits are 

neither like nor directly competitive 

with the commercial light fixtures 

produced at the subject facility. 

After careful review of the request for 

reconsideration, the Department 

determines that there is no new 

information that supports a finding that 

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 

was satisfied and that no mistake or 

misinterpretation of the facts or of the 

law with regards to the number or 

proportion of workers separated from 

the subject firm during the relevant 

period. 

Conclusion 

After review of the application and 

investigative findings, I conclude that 

there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES