alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-168-01-SM

Robert Shatney

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 19) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than February 10, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00168-SM Document 20 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 24, 2006 9:00 AM 

Jury Selection: April 4, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

February 3, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

 Jean-Claude Sakellario, Esq.

 Paul Garrity, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00168-SM Document 20 Filed 02/03/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Robert ZICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Minnesota; Don Winger; Mike Ryan; Dave Thomalla; John Banick, Defendants-Appellees. *806Kevin Berglund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Maplewood, Minnesota; Don Winger; Mike Ryan; Dave Thomalla; John Banick, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 01-3855, 01-3857.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 6, 2002.

Decided Nov. 21, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Robert Zick and Kevin Berglund have separately appealed from the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, City of Maplewood; Don Winger; Mike Ryan; Dave Thomalla; and John Banick, on all issues. The claims of both parties arise from the same set of facts. This court, on its own motion, consolidates the two cases for purposes of deciding the issues on appeal.

We have reviewed the record of the district court and find no error. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1205

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national cemetery

for veterans in the Jacksonville, Florida, metropolitan area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. STEARNS (for himself and Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a

national cemetery for veterans in the Jacksonville, Florida, metropolitan area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

5 shall establish, in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38,

6 United States Code, a national cemetery in the Jackson7 ville, Florida, metropolitan area to serve the needs of vet8 erans and their families.
2

•HR 1205 IH

1 (b) CONSULTATION IN SELECTION OF SITE.—Before

2 selecting the site for the national cemetery established

3 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—

4 (1) appropriate officials of the State of Florida

5 and local officials of the Jacksonville metropolitan

6 area, and

7 (2) appropriate officials of the United States,

8 including the Administrator of General Services,

9 with respect to land belonging to the United States

10 in that area that would be suitable to establish the

11 national cemetery under subsection (a).

12 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date

13 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit

14 to Congress a report on the establishment of the national

15 cemetery under subsection (a). The report shall set forth

16 a schedule for such establishment and an estimate of the

17 costs associated with such establishment.

Æ
TEST DOCUMENT A

Case: 60-2424 Document: 809 Page: 1 Filed: 02/26/2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

City of Laconia, et al .

V .

Atlantic Administrators Insurance Agency, Inc ., et al.

Civil No. 05-cv-306-JD

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41 .1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with

prejudice .

SO ORDERED.

October 15, 2007 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judg e

cc: Russell Hilliard, Esq. William Pandolph, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00306-JD Document 27 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 1
#### Mrs. Elizabeth REGGIE v. Salim KARRE.

No. 908.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Cicruit.

Feb. 8, 1932.

Milner & Porteous, of New Orleans, and Emile A. Carmouche, of Crowley, for appellant.

Percy T. Ogden, of Crowley, for appellee.

MOUTON, J.

In this case, for the reasons stated in the case of Mrs. Victoria Aboud Reggie v. Karre (La. App.) 139 So. 532, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with cost.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

Antonio King,

Plaintiff,

v . Civil No. 04-CV-356-JD

Cesar Rivas et al.,

Defendants .

Order to Make David Coulombe Available for Video Testimon y

It is hereby ordered that the NH Department of Corrections shall make witness David

Coulombe (NHSP #33673) available for video testimony from the Northern Correctional Facility

in Berlin to the United States Courthouse in Concord on January 24, 2006, at 10 :30 a.m.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00356-SM Document 44 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V.

Robert Shamey

Case No. 05-cr- 168-0 1 -SM

ORDE R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 10) is granted. Trial has

been rescheduled for the February 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial

Rights not later than November 1, 2005 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best

interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that

failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary

for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00168-SM Document 11 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
exercise of due diligence under the circumstances .

Final Pretrial Conference : January 27, 2006 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection : February 7, 2006 at 9 :30 AM

SO ORDERED.

O

October 24, 2005 ~=----

S

cc: Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq .

Paul Garrity, Esq.

Jean-Claude Sakellarios, Esq .

U. S . Probation

U. S . Marshal

McAu

2

Case 1:05-cr-00168-SM Document 11 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.20


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, iHeartMedia, Inc. (formerly known as CC Media Holdings, Inc.) (“Company”) and Steven J. Macri (“Employee”) entered into an Employment Agreement effective October 7, 2013 and amended on July 3, 2017, February 27, 2018 and March 4, 2019 (“Collectively, the Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the above-referenced Agreement;


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties enter into this Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Fourth Amendment”).


1.This Fourth Amendment is effective upon complete execution by the parties.


2.    Section 1 (Term of Employment) of the Agreement is amended such that the Employment Period is extended through December 31, 2019.
3.    Section 3(e) (Long Term Incentive) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:
(e)          One-Time Long-Term Incentive Grant.  As additional consideration for entering into this Agreement, Employee has been awarded a one-time Long Term Incentive Grant of 150,000 units, allocated as follows:  (i) 52,500 restricted stock units and (ii) 97,500 options to acquire shares of Class A Common Stock of iHeartMedia, Inc. (“iHM, Inc.”), pursuant to the iHM, Inc. 2019 Incentive Equity Plan (the “Plan”), and applicable award agreement and related vesting provisions. 
4.    Section 9(e)(i) (Compensation Upon Termination) of the Agreement is amended to such that the Severance Payments shall increase from One Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,400,000.00) to Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00), paid out over the same twelve (12) month Severance Pay Period.  All other provisions in Section 9(e)(i) shall remain unchanged.
5.    This Fourth Amendment represents the complete and total understanding of the parties with respect to the content thereof, and cannot be modified or altered except if done so in writing, and executed by all parties.  All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment on the date written below and upon full execution by all parties, this Agreement shall be effective as set forth in Section 1 above.




EMPLOYEE:


	
			
	/s/ Steven J. Macri
	Date:
	8/14/19

	Steven J. Macri
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 








1











COMPANY:


	
			
	/s/ Richard J. Bressler
	Date:
	8/14/19

	Richard J. Bressler
	 
	 

	President, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


	 
	 








PREPARED BY: LW/tn


2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11311 and #11312] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 7. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1773-DR), dated 06/28/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2008 through 08/13/2008.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/08/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/30/2008.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/30/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: 

U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 06/28/2008 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Counties:*                     (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Adair, Callaway, Chariton, Harrison, Macon, Monroe, Putnam.                 

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Missouri:  Boone, Cole, Howard, Mercer, Osage, Randolph, Saline, Schuyler. 

Iowa: Appanoose, Decatur, Ringgold, Wayne. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-21410 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Parks

v. Civil No. 04-cv-445-pp

Carol Tatarinowicz, et al

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 81, Order

Ruling: I vacate my order dismissing the complaint without
prejudice and instead order that the pleadings that were not
accompanied by a certificate of service shall be stricken and
returned to the plaintiff.

Entered by: Paul Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge
Date: August 4, 2005

cc: William Parks, pro se
Karla Black, Esq.
Donald Gardner, Esq.
Kenneth D. Murphy, Esq.
William G. Scott, Esq.
Charles Pp. Bauer, Esq.
Lawrence B. Gormley, Esq.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of RedRoller Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 31, 2008, as amended by Form 10-K/A, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2008 (the “Report”), I, C.
Andrew Brooks, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 By:
              /s/ C. Andrew BrooksC.
      Andrew BrooksExecutive
      Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
                (principal
      financial and accounting officer)
 
 
 April 29,
2008
#### JUSTICE v. COMMERCIAL STANDARD INS. CO. et al.

No. 7142.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 30, 1948.

Thompson, Thompson & Sparks, of Monroe, for appellants.

Fink & Fink, of Monroe, for appellee.

HARDY, Judge.

This is an action for the recovery of damages sustained by an automobile, of which plaintiff is the alleged owner, as the result of a collision with a car operated by the defendant, Youngblood. The liability insurer was made a party defendant. After trial on the merits there was judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants in the full sum of $352.79, together with interest and costs, from which judgment defendants have appealed.

The facts concerned are set forth in detail in our opinion in a connected case entitled Burke v. Commercial Standard Insurance Company et al., 38 So.2d 644, in which we lhave this day rendered a judgment, on appeal from the Twenty-Eighth Judicial District Court in and for Caldwell Parish.

Under the facts stated in the case referred to, we found the negligence of the defendant, Youngblood, to have been the proximate cause of the accident, and, further, exonerated the driver of the automobile, for damages to which this plaintiff seeks recovery, on the charge of contributory negligence.

This finding would dispose" of this case except for the fact that defendants strenuously contend that plaintiff is not in truth and in fact the-owner of the automobile which sustained damages in the accident. We think it unnecessary to indulge in any exhaustive discussion of this point. While we concede the somewhat suspicious nature of the transaction by which plaintiff claims ownership of the vehicle as the result of conveyance from his aunt, Mrs. Burke, and while there are certain discrepancies in th.e testimony of plaintiff and the witness, Burke, in our opinion, these are not of sufficient importance to justify a finding in favor of the contention made by defendants.

The burden was upon defendants to support by a preponderance of the evidence the position which they assumed. Plaintiff made out a prima facie case sustaining his claim of ownership and defendants have failed to overcome this showing by the required weight of evidence.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6661** 

CALVIN LYNDALE GADDY , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v. THE SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COURTS, For recusal/bias, For Bivens Action/Prejudices , Defendant

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 02387

- JFA )

Submitted : August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING , and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Calvin Lyndale Gaddy appeals the district court ’ s order s adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his civil complaint, and denying reconsideration

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gaddy v. S.C. Di st. Courts , No. 8:13

- cv - 02387

- JFA ( D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2014; Apr. 28, 2014 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,126
<INVENTORY>                                     17,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,469
<PP&E>                                         102,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,226
<BONDS>                                         15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,549
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,632
<SALES>                                        358,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               358,410
<CGS>                                          311,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.13
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION



I, David Morris, Principal Executive Officer of Blink Logic Inc. (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 17, 2008 |  | /s/David Morris
David Morris
President & Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------























---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Lucien H. Groleau

v. Civil No. 04-cv-332-JD

American Express Financial

Advisors, Inc., et al.

PROCEDURAL ORDER

This case was removed to this court on September 12, 2004,

and since December of 2004 it has been stayed pending the

parties’ efforts to resolve the claims through arbitration. The

plaintiff was ordered to provide status reports about the

progress of arbitration. In response, the plaintiff asked for

ninety days to conclude his efforts to arbitrate, which the court

granted on May 26, 2006, with the requirement that the plaintiff

file monthly status reports.

On June 23, 2006, the plaintiff reported that he anticipated

“[e]fforts to schedule arbitration for mid to late July will

occur next week.” On June 27, the court ordered the plaintiff to

file a status report following arbitration. The plaintiff has

not filed a status report as of this date.

Given the protracted stay in this case, it is appropriate to

administratively close it. The case will be reopened upon motion

of either party.

Case 1:04-cv-00332-JD Document 21 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the clerk of court shall

administratively close this case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

August 24, 2006

cc: Michael R. Callahan, Esquire

Lisa Snow Wade, Esquire

Case 1:04-cv-00332-JD Document 21 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2