alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52949-52950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XJ54


Marine Mammals; File No. 13428

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given that Niladri Basu, Ph.D., Department 
of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, 109 South 
Observatory Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, has been issued a 
scientific research permit to import marine mammal specimens for 
scientific research.

ADDRESSES:  The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521; and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298; phone (978)281-9300; fax (978)281-9394.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jennifer Skidmore or Kate Swails, 
(301) 713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 12, 2008, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (73 FR 33399) that a request for a scientific 
research permit had been submitted by the above-named individual. The 
requested permit has been issued under the authority of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and 
the regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals 
(50 CFR part 216).
    The permit authorizes the importation of brain tissues from 40 
baikal seals (Phoca sibirica). These samples were collected in 2005 
under a joint agreement between the East-Siberian Research and 
Production Fisheries Center (Russia) and the Center for Marine 
Environmental Studies (Japan). The purpose of this study is to 
determine: (1) the types and amounts of heavy metals that baikal seals 
accumulate in specific brain regions; and (2) whether these exposures 
are a neurotoxicological concern by using novel biomarker technologies. 
This permit will expire one year from date of issuance.
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.


[[Page 52950]]


    Dated: September 8, 2008.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-21349 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-220-01-SM

Jean Oriol

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 15) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than March 30, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

Case 1:05-cr-00220-SM Document 16 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
2

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: June 28, 2006 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: July 6, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 22, 2006 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Terry Ollila, Esq.

 Paul Garrity, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00220-SM Document 16 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
#### MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM CO. v. STUBBLEFIELD.

No. 4684.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 29, 1934.

For former opinion, see 152 So. 335.

Parsons & Colvin, of Mansfield, for appellant.

Craig, Bolin & Magee, of Mansfield, for ap-pellee.

*472MILLS, Judge.

After carefully re-reading the record in this case and considering the briefs filed on rehearing, we, by a somewhat different route, again are impelled to the conclusion that the judgment of the lower court rejecting plaintiff’s demand is correct.

Plaintiff sold gasoline to defendant under a sound system calling for a signed receipt for every gallon delivered. They chose to flagrantly deviate from this method, sometimes having their own deliverymen sign the receipts and at others affixing defendant’s name in .their office after purported delivery.

The account is questioned by defendant, in apparent good faith, based upon a physical' gauge of his tank showing a large shortage in the sales claimed. Under these circumstances plaintiff is called upon to prove its account with exactness and precision. If, because of the justness of the defense or its own slipshod methods, it cannot do this, recovery must be denied. Counsel for plaintiff insists that his client should be given judgment because of defendant’s promise to pay. We do not find that defendant ever abandoned his protest. The promise was conditional upon the size of the payments required and was apparently made in an effort to avoid litigation, defendant never before having been sued or involved in any dispute with other oil concerns. We think this is true despite the terms of a letter of July 16, 1931.

Eor the above reasons our former judgment is reinstated and made the final judgment of this court.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of deCODE genetics, Inc. (the “Registrant”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, KariStefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,and Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: August 10,  2009 | /s/ Kari Stefansson            |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                         | Kari Stefansson                |
|                         | Chairman, President and  Chief |
|                         | Executive Officer              |
|                         |                           |
|                         |                           |
| Dated: August 10,  2009 | /s/ Lance Thibault             |
|                         | Lance Thibault                 |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer  and   |
|                         | Treasurer                      |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1131 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1131

     To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure 
 Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under the Radiation Exposure 
                Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2001

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. Udall of Colorado, and Mr. 
  Matheson) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide permanent appropriations to the Radiation Exposure 
 Compensation Trust Fund to make payments under the Radiation Exposure 
                Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION TRUST FUND APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Paul Hicks 
Memorial Act''.
    (b) Appropriations.--There are appropriated, out of any money in 
the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2002, and each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may 
be necessary to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Trust Fund for the 
purpose of making payments to eligible beneficiaries under the 
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DILLON M. SALVO,

Defendant.

8:23CR119

ORDER

This matter came before the Court for a status conference by telephone with counsel for the 

parties and the undersigned magistrate judge. At the request of the defendant, unopposed by the 

government, and for good cause shown this matter will be reset for a status conference. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's oral motion for a status conference is granted.

2) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice 

will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of 

this motion, that is, the time between today's date and on April 8, 2024, shall be deemed 

excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial 

Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary 

for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and the 

novelty and complexity of the case. The failure to grant this motion might result in a 

miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to 

this order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any 

right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

3) A telephonic status conference with counsel will be held before the undersigned 

magistrate judge at 11:30 a.m. on April 8, 2024. Counsel for the parties shall use the 

conferencing instructions provided by the Court under filing [47] to participate in the 

call.

Dated this 4th day of March, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00119-BCB-MDN Doc # 57 Filed: 03/04/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 94
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Samuel J. Bourne, Individually

and as Trustee of Bedrock Realty Trust

and Cheryl L. Bourne, Individually

and as Trustee of Bedrock Realty Trust

v. Civil No. 05-365-JD

Town of Madison, New Hampshire,

Madison Board of Selectmen,

John R. Arruda, Jr., Clifford A. Graves,

Eileen T. Crafts, and Robert D. King

PROCEDURAL ORDER

Due to the number of criminal trials currently scheduled for

the two weeks beginning January 23, 2007, it does not appear that

this case will be reached. Therefore, the final pretrial

conference and trial will be continued and will be rescheduled.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

January 8, 2007

cc: Catherine M. Costanzo, Esquire

Brian J.S. Cullen, Esquire

Rachel A. Hampe, Esquire

Richard D. Sager, Esquire

Gerald F. Williamson, Esquire

Case 1:05-cv-00365-JD Document 56 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Partnerships for Point of Care 
(POC) Diagnostic Technologies for Nontraditional Health Care 
Settings.
    Date: October 6, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Lynn Rust, PhD., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-3938, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#117d6323232967517f78793f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b27397979733d0b252223652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 4, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-21039 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00061

- CV

Santos Valentin Ramos v. Taylor Leann Shafer
On Appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- 01

- 85376

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having cons idered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 26, 2022
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 50061 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Jeremias Santiago Hernandez,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:09

- CR

- 216

- 4

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Jeremias Santiago Hernandez , federal prisoner # 39692

- 177 , appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). On appeal, he contends that the district court failed to weigh all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) senten cing factors and did not take

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determi ned that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 5, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50061 Document: 00516154560 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2022No. 21

- 50061

2 into consideration all his extraordinary and compelling reasons for a sentence reduction

. We review a district court’s decision denying compassionate release
for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). A district court may modify a defendant’s sentence, after considering the applicable § 3553(a) factors, if “extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction” and “such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing
Commission.” § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

. The record reflects that the district court
did no t abuse its discretion in determining that a sentence reduction was not warranted based on its review of the § 3553(a) sentencing factors.
Accordingly, the district court’s order is AFFIRMED

. Case: 21-50061 Document: 00516154560 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/05/2022
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)        May 13, 2005


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
 Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the
 Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Kenneth Botehlo

Case No . 05-cr-247-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Botehlo's motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 9) . Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2006

trial period. Defendant Botehlo shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than February 1, 2006 . On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U .S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference : March 24, 2006 at 11 :30 a.m.

Jury Selection : April 4, 2006 at 9 :30 a .m.

Case 1:05-cr-00247-SM Document 10 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

January 24, 2006

cc : Kenneth Glidden, Esq .

Mark Irish, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Steven,4 . McAuli

Chief Judge

2

Case 1:05-cr-00247-SM Document 10 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Case: 13-12330-BAH Doc #: 114 Filed: 08/17/15 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 5
Case: 13-12330-BAH Doc #: 114 Filed: 08/17/15 Desc: Main Document Page 2 of 5
Case: 13-12330-BAH Doc #: 114 Filed: 08/17/15 Desc: Main Document Page 3 of 5
Case: 13-12330-BAH Doc #: 114 Filed: 08/17/15 Desc: Main Document Page 4 of 5
Case: 13-12330-BAH Doc #: 114 Filed: 08/17/15 Desc: Main Document Page 5 of 5
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofSeptember 19, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-4 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”)during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: 
/s/ Marc Womack
Name: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: 
/s/ Erik Laney
Name: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
Exhibit 10.9


 


Horn
& Co. Draft – June 27, 2018


 


confidential


Dan
Woodard


McDermott
Will & Emery LLP


Feb
28, 2019 16:09


 


Amendment
to Amended and Restated Software Services Agreement


 


THIS
AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated June 27, 2018 and
effective as of October 1, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), is made and entered into by and between INX Ltd., a
company organized under the laws of Gibraltar (the “Company”) and Committed Ltd., a company organized under
the laws of the State of Israel (the “Service Provider”). Each of the Service Provider and the Company shall
sometimes be referred to as a “Party” and collectively, as the “Parties”.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties entered into a Software Services Agreement, dated as of the Effective Date, as amended by the Amended and Restated
Software Services Agreement on May 9, 2018 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend the Agreement, as further set forth herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall bear the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.



 


		2.	The
date “June 30, 2018” set forth in Sections 3.3 and 14.5 of the Agreement is hereby replaced by the following
date: “September 30, 2018”.



 


		3.	Unless
amended hereby, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



 


INWITNESS
WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	 	 	 
	INX
    Ltd.	 	Committed
    Ltd.


 


confidential


Dan
Woodard


McDermott
Will & Emery LLP


Feb
28, 2019 16:09


 


Confidential
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-3567WM

_____________

Henry L. Ivy, Jr., *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: August 7, 1997

Filed: August 18, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Henry L. Ivy, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Ivy's motion to vacate

and correct his sentence, brought under former Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

35(a). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.