alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Steve Bond, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of NeoVolta, Inc. (the “registrant”);                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           



Date: October 28, 2022



/s/ Steve Bond

Steve Bond

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1763-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1763-DR), dated May 27, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 26, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 27, 2008. 

Howard, Humboldt, Jackson, and Poweshiek Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance). 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-20830 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARSEL PETERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1836

[June 27, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-12651CF10B.

Marsel Peterson, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

|   |   |  | 1725                Eye Street, NWSuite                600Washington,                DC 20006TEL                (202) 336-7700TOLL                (800) 955-9622FAX                (202) 336-7622 |
|--------|--------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| a.   | A                review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the                preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling                and                Servicing Agreement has been made under my                supervision. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | To                the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master                Sevicer                has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material                respects throughout the year. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| c.   | We                have received no notice regarding the qualification, or challenging                the                status, of the Upper-Tier REMIC, the Lower-Tier REMIC as a REMIC                or the                Grantor Trust as a grantor trust from the IRS or any other governmental                agency or body. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |  www.ncb.coop | Banking                & Financial ServicesCooperative                ExpansionEconomic                Development |
|--------|--------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Case 1:05-cv-00177-SM   Document 59   Filed 07/01/08   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00177-SM   Document 59   Filed 07/01/08   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00177-SM   Document 59   Filed 07/01/08   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:05-cv-00177-SM   Document 59   Filed 07/01/08   Page 4 of 4
**OFFICE OF**  

### -I-NE **AlTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  **AUSTIN**



### Your httttr-or t l okr the eplalon u 1tu x? at- tllo to 

### Gahool~ua . .. . -- theBoar:0 -orc

2. x. Fairohild Aaoitrtont
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael De Angelis

v. 04-cv-456-SM

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, et 

ORDER

Re: Document No. 120, Motion for Hearing

Ruling: Although plaintiff has designated his Motion for

Hearing as a pleading to be filed in this case, it is apparent from

the text of the motion [letter] that he seeks relief completely

unrelated to the subject matter of this litigation. 

The clerk shall strike the reference to this case’s docket

number, remove the motion from this docket, and process the motion

[letter] as in the usual course as if plaintiff were seeking to

file a new action for relief based upon alleged incidents occurring

on September 25, 2006. 

Plaintiff is also reminded that he must first exhaust

available administrative remedies, consistently with deadlines

prescribed by prison policies and regulations, before he can

pursue litigation in this court. Those deadlines are short.

Generally, inmates must file appropriate administrative claims

within 30 days of the incident giving rise to the claim for relief.

Therefore, plaintiff should not delay in filing his administrative

claim. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief District Judge

Date: October 5, 2006

cc: Michael De Angelis, pro se

John Curran, Esq.

Elizabeth Hurley, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00456-SM Document 123 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 1
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit

the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 2001

Mr. VITTER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to limit the number of terms that a Member

of Congress may serve.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States:
2

•HJ 57 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served six terms as

3 a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House

4 of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the elec5 tion of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Rep6 resentatives shall be included as one term in determining

7 the number of terms that such person has served as a Rep8 resentative if the person fills the vacancy for more than

9 one year.

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served two terms

11 as a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment

12 to the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election

13 or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate

14 shall be included as one term in determining the number

15 of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the

16 person fills the vacancy for more than three years.

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of

18 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account

19 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under

20 this article.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of Americ a

V .

Kimberly Baez

Case No . 05-cr-171-01-SM

ORDER

Defendant Baez's motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 9) . Trial has been rescheduled for the February 2006

trial period. Defendant Baez shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than December 2, 2005 . On the filing of such waiver, her continuance shall be

effective .

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U .S .C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: January 24, 2006 at 3 :30 p.m.

Jury Selection : February 7, 2006 at 9 :30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00171-SM Document 10 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED .

November 28, 2005

cc : William Christie, Esq .

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Stevero . McAuliffe

Chief Judge

2

Case 1:05-cr-00171-SM Document 10 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxco, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence O. Fields, as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: 
                August 14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Lawrence
              O. FieldsLawrence
                O. Fields
              Chief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-709
In Re: JOHN CORDERO, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-358-3) Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Cordero, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Cordero, a federal prisoner, brought this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to take action on a pending motion, to hold an evidentiary hearing onan additional motion, and to forbid the district court from imposing sentence pending appeal. Because the district court subsequently denied Cordero's pending motion, this issue is moot. Regarding Cordero's desire to have this court order the district court to hold an evidentiary hearing and to stay sentencing pendingappeal, we note that this court has no authority to order the district court to take such action. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988) (holding that mandamus relief may only be invoked when respondent is under clear duty to do act requested by petitioner). Accordingly, although we grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-95-01-PB

Cushaw Barnett

ORDER

Re: Document No. 39, Motion to Disqualify Judge Barbadoro

from hearing the motion to void the judgment

Ruling: The motion to recuse is conclusory, frivolous and

entirely without merit. Moreover, the case is long since closed,

no appeal having been taken. The motion - presumedly to recuse

Judge Barbadoro- is denied. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: September 9, 2009

cc: Cushaw Barnett, Pro Se

Debra Walsh, Esq.

Case 1:05-cr-00095-SM Document 47 Filed 09/09/09 Page 1 of 1
#### FARNET v. DE CUERS et al.

No. 17397.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 4, 1940.

Writ of Certiorari Denied July 18, 1940.

For prior opinion, see 195 So. *797.*

John B. O’Connor and Spearing, Mc-Clendon & McCabe, all of New Orleans, for appellants.

Alex E. Rainold, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Donald DeCuers and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company have jointly filed application for rehearing and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company has filed an additional separate application. In this separate application the insurance company complains that we found that' De-Cuers had been instructed that each night he should store the car assigned to him in a public garage selected by the Board of Health, whereas there is in the record no evidence to this effect.

This complaint is well founded. The evidence does not show that any such instruction had been given, or that such a garage had been selected by the Board of Health. The record does show, however, that it was the custom of DeCuers to store the car in a public ■ garage and that when he took the car from in front of his residence, though his immediate purpose was to take Farnet home, he intended after-wards to place it in the public garage, as usual.

It seems certain that, when the car was assigned to him, it was contemplated that it would be stored at night in some garage and not left in the public street. It is proper to say, then, that in taking the car from the curb with the purpose of ultimately placing it in the garage, DeCuers did so with the permission of the named assured as the applicable policy provision has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in Parks v. Hall, 189 La. 849, 181 So. 191, and by the majority of the members of this court in Haeuser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, et al., 187 So. 684.

Counsel further complains that we ignore certain testimony of DeCuers in which he stated that he had left the car on the street and in effect said that he would have left it there all night had he not decided to take Farnet to his home.

We did not ignore this evidence, but we think that it, together with the other statements of DeCuers, shows that when he took the car from the curb, he had in mind the ultimate accomplishment of a purpose contemplated when the car was assigned to him — that is, the placing of it in a garage for storage at night.

All applications for rehearing are refused.

All applications for rehearing refused.
Wolff v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-173-01-SM

Daniel Riendeau

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. Defendant faces substantial jail time if

convicted. On the eve of trial and facing the potential of a

jail sentence defendant violated his home detention for a weekend

of partying. While he did show up for trial he has demonstrated

that he is unlikely to abide by the home detention condition or

any similar combination of conditions. The conditions of release

are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

Case 1:05-cr-00173-SM Document 60 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 2
2

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 18, 2007 

cc: Helen W. Fitzgibbon, Esq.

 Bruce E. Kenna, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00173-SM Document 60 Filed 06/18/07 Page 2 of 2