alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7028 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7028

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that the 3-
   month State residency requirement for applicants for naturalized 
  citizenship do not apply with respect to spouses of members of the 
Armed Forces serving on active duty at a location in the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

   Ms. Herrera Beutler (for herself and Mr. Thompson of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that the 3-
   month State residency requirement for applicants for naturalized 
  citizenship do not apply with respect to spouses of members of the 
Armed Forces serving on active duty at a location in the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Security for Military 
Spouses Act''.

SEC. 2. NO STATE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT FOR SPOUSES OF MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY AT A LOCATION IN THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    Section 319 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1430) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) In the case of a person lawfully admitted for permanent 
residence in the United States who is the spouse of a member of the 
Armed Forces serving on active duty at a location in the United States, 
the requirement under subsection (a) of this section and under section 
316(a) that a person have resided within the State or the Service 
district in the United States in which the applicant filed his 
application for at least three months shall not apply.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas CARTER v. LE BLANC LUMBER CO. et al.

No. 3049.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1948.

Sanders Miller Downing & Rubin, of Baton Rouge, for appellants.

Watson Blanche Fridge & Wilson, of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

DORE, Judge.

For the reasons this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Carter and Crimp v. LeBlanc Lumber Co. et al., La.App., 37 So.2d 471, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from' is hereby annulled, reversed and set aside and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Thomas Carter, and against the defendants LeBlanc Lumber Co., J. Burton Le-Blanc, Jessie LeBlanc and the Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan, in solido, in the full sum of One Hundred and Fifty ($150) Dollars, for himself and the further sum of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250) Dollars for the use and benefit of the General Insurance Company of America, together with legal interest thereon from date of judicial demand until paid and all costs of these proceedings.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 704 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 704

  To amend section 708 of title 17, United States Code, to permit the 
  Register of Copyrights to waive fees for filing an application for 
  registration of a copyright claim in certain circumstances, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2021

Mr. Jeffries (for himself and Ms. Mace) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 708 of title 17, United States Code, to permit the 
  Register of Copyrights to waive fees for filing an application for 
  registration of a copyright claim in certain circumstances, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Artistic Recognition for Talented 
Students Act'' or the ``ARTS Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FEES FOR WINNERS OF CERTAIN COMPETITIONS.

    Section 708 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e)(1) In this subsection, the term `covered competition' means--
            ``(A) an art competition sponsored by the Congressional 
        Institute that is open only to high school students; and
            ``(B) the competition described in section 3 of H. Res. 77, 
        as adopted by the 113th Congress.
    ``(2) With respect to a work that wins a covered competition, the 
Register of Copyrights--
            ``(A) shall waive the requirement under subsection (a)(1) 
        with respect to an application for registration of a copyright 
        claim for that work if that application is filed not later than 
        the last day of the calendar year following the year in which 
        the work claimed by the application wins the covered 
        competition (referred to in this paragraph as the `covered 
        year'); and
            ``(B) may waive the fee described in subparagraph (A) for 
        an application filed after the end of the covered year if the 
        fee would have been waived under that subparagraph had the 
        application been submitted before the last day of the covered 
        year.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1997
<CASH>                                              46
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10717
<ALLOWANCES>                                       330
<INVENTORY>                                      11448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 24669
<PP&E>                                           33879
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   41640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            18718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2030
<OTHER-SE>                                        5851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     41640
<SALES>                                          49386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 49386
<CGS>                                            37767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    47383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (391)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1283
<INCOME-TAX>                                       535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
#### KIRSCHMAN v. POWELL.

No. 14397.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 30, 1933.

W. C. Orchard, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Deutsch, Kerrigan & Burke and Rolf I. Seeberg, all of New Orleans; for appellee.

HIGGINS, J.

This is a suit by a landlord against a tenant to recover, the sum of $225 representing rent alleged to be due for the months of May, June, and July, 1932, at the rate of $75 per month, under an oral month to month lease, and for recognition and maintenance of the lessor's lien and privilege on the furniture and effects in the premises.

Defendant answered admitting that she occupied the building as a tenant, but denying that she was indebted to the plaintiff.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff-as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff testified that defendant had occupied the house covering the period in question at a rental of $75 per month, payable in advance, and that she failed to pay the rent therefor.

Defendant stated that she had occupied the property for the months in controversy and was obligated to pay a rental therefor of $75 per month, but that she had paid the rent and thought she had some receipts at home to show payment. These receipts, however, were not produced.

On cross-examination, the plaintiff was asked if he did not know that the building was being used for the purpose of conducting an assignation house. Counsel for plaintiff objected on the ground that the sole defense was in the nature of a plea of - payment, and that there was no averment in the answer in the way of a special plea which would justify the introduction of evidence along the lines sought to be elicited. The court ruled that the objection was well founded, and sustained it. We believe that the ruling of the trial court was correct; but in passing will say that the record shows that the plaintiff stated that the building was used as a rooming house, whereas the defendant said that she had used the premises for immoral purposes. Even if the answer had specially pleaded the defense sought to be injected by the evidence, the defendant certainly failed to sustain her position; particularly as she had the burden of proving this special defense. • •

We conclude that the judgment of the trial court is correct, and it is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

WESTEUEIELD, J., being absent, takes no part.
EXHIBIT
32.7

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I,
Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C., to
the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Energy
Holdings L.L.C. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.

| | /s/ Thomas
  M. OFlynn      
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | Thomas M.
  OFlynn          
| | PSEG Energy
  Holdings L.L.C.
| | Chief
  Financial Officer    
| | October 30,
  2003
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ST EVEN RAY BAKER , A ppellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2428 LT Case No. 2011

- 2345

- CF

STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed March 7, 2023 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County , Howard O. McGillin, Jr., J udge.

Steven Ra y Baker, Blountstown, p ro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, J r., A ssistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J. , EDWARDS and JAY , JJ. , concur.
#### BREITHAUPT v. BREITHAUPT et al.

No. 5682.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 1, 1938.

K. Hundley, of Alexandria, and P. S. Gaharan, of Jena, for appellants.

Flowers & Russell, of Jena, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

 Defendant and his daughter, Mrs. Mattie Breithaupt Walker, appealed sus-pensively from an order of executory proc*524ess signed by the Clerk of Court of LaSalle Parish, on application of plaintiff, who sought to foreclose a mortgage held by him against property of defendant. The order of executory process improperly and improvidently issued, it is contended by appellants, because the note which is secured by said mortgage was not attached to the petition, was not presented to, nor was it before the clerk when he signed said order. This contention is well founded. It it not controverted here; in fact, concurred in by appellee through written motion of his counsel in which he prays that the suit be dismissed as of nonsuit and the order appealed from be vacated and set aside.

For said reasons, the order of executory process appealed from is now annulled, reversed and set aside, and plaintiff’s suit dismissed as of nonsuit, and at his cost in both courts.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 53793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

RIN 1545-BB67
[REG-157711-02]


Unified Rule for Loss on Subsidiary Stock

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Partial withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document withdraws proposed regulations relating to the 
application of section 362(e)(2) to intercompany transactions and to 
certain modifications to the investment adjustment rules.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcie P. Barese, (202) 622-7790 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background and Explanation of Provisions

    On January 23, 2007, the IRS and Treasury Department published a 
notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (72 FR 2964) 
under Sec.  1.1502-36 (Unified Loss Rule). The proposed regulations 
provided rules under Sec.  1.1502-13(e)(4) that would suspend the 
application of section 362(e)(2) in the case of intercompany 
transactions. The proposed regulations also provided rules under Sec.  
1.1502-32(c)(1)(ii) relating to the treatment of items attributable to 
property transferred in an intercompany section 362(e)(2) transaction.
    After consideration of the comments received responding to the 
notice of proposed rulemaking, the IRS and Treasury Department have 
concluded that the proposed rules would not be promulgated and, 
instead, that final regulations would make section 362(e)(2) generally 
inapplicable to intercompany transactions. Accordingly, Sec. Sec.  
1.1502-13(e)(4) and 1.1502-32(c)(1)(ii) of the proposed regulations are 
hereby withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Partial Withdrawal of Proposed Regulations

    Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, proposed 
Sec. Sec.  1.1502-13(e)(4) and 1.1502-32(c)(1)(ii) published in the 
Federal Register on January 23, 2007 are withdrawn.

Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
 [FR Doc. E8-21005 Filed 9-9-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14

- 14

- 00993

- CV

Samuel Joseph Jackson

v.

Paul Houston LaValle

(No. 2014

- 17352 IN 113TH DISTR ICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

FILING

ST ATEWIDE EFILING $175.00
$20.00 05/04/2015

05/04/2015 PAID

PAID ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Housto n, Texas

are $195.00

.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHR ISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fo urteenth District of Texas, September 24, 2015

.
Exhibit 11

National Presto Industries, Inc.

|                                                                  |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        |  |  |   |        | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------ |  | ---------------- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ------ |  |  | - | ------ | 
|(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)                              |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        | 
|                                                                  |  | Second Quarter |        |  | First Six Months |  
|                                                                  |  | 2009           |        |  | 2008             |   |       | 2009 |  |   | 2008   | 
|Net Earnings  (1)                                                 |  | $              | 13,346 |  |                  | $ | 9,582 |      |  | $ | 24,200 |  |  | $ | 15,832 | 
|                                                                  |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Weighted average common shares outstanding  (2)                   |  |                | 6,855  |  |                  |   | 6,845 |      |  |   | 6,852  |  |  |   | 6,842  | 
|                                                                  |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive  |  |                |      |  |                  |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |   |      | 
|                                                                  |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Adjusted common and common equivalent
shares for computation  (3) |  |                | 6,855  |  |                  |   | 6,845 |      |  |   | 6,852  |  |  |   | 6,842  | 
|                                                                  |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Net earnings per share:                                           |  |                |        |  |                  |   |       |      |  |   |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Basic  (1 divided by 2)                                           |  | $              | 1.95   |  |                  | $ | 1.40  |      |  | $ | 3.53   |  |  | $ | 2.31   | 
|Diluted  (1 divided by 3)                                         |  | $              | 1.95   |  |                  | $ | 1.40  |      |  | $ | 3.53   |  |  | $ | 2.31   |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                            OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


      I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public
Service Enterprise Group Incorporated.


                                    /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                    THOMAS M. O'FLYNN
                                    Public Service Enterprise Group
                                    Incorporated
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    October 28, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11409 and <greek-i>11410]


Florida Disaster Number FL-00035

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA--1785--DR), dated 08/26/
2008.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Fay.
    Incident Period: 08/18/2008 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 09/01/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/27/2008.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/26/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated 08/26/2008 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:
Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Duval, 
Lee, Leon, Seminole, Wakulla.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Florida: Baker, Clay, Franklin, Gadsden, Jefferson, Liberty, 
Nassau, Saint Johns.
    Georgia: Grady, Thomas.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)


James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-20843 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**EXHIBIT  32.3**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18****of the United States Code**

I, Robert E. Busch, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ Robert E. Busch                                                                                 |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                     |
|   |   |   | Robert E. BuschPublic Service Electric and Gas CompanyChief Financial Officer        August 1, 2003 |

 

----