alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T FE DERI CO OCAM PO RAM I RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73621 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 365- 168 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P e t i t i one rF e de r i c o O c a m po R a m i r e z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de ni a l of hi s appl i c a t i on f

orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m ova l and m ot i on f

orc ont i nuanc e . A f

t e rthe B oar d r e ve r s e d the I J ’ s i ni t i a l gr ant



# FI LED OC T 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

of c a nc e l l a t i on r e l i e f

a nd r e m ande d f

orf urthe rpr oc e e di ngs , the I Jhe l d ahe ar i ng a nd c ons i de r e d f

urthe re vi de nc e s upport i ng R a m i r e z ’ s appl i c a t i on f orc anc e l l a t i on of re m ov al . O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e di sm i ss i n p art a n dd e n yi n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that R am i re z f

ai l ed t o sho w exce pt i on aland extre m el y unu sualhardshi p t o h i s U ni t ed S ta te s c itiz e n c h ild . 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ; Mendez- Castro v. Mukasey , 552 F . 3d 975, 979 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . L i ke w i s e , w e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the a ge nc y ’ s de ni a l of

R a m i r e z ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n ba s e d on f urthe re vi de nc e of h a r d s h ip in tr o du c e da t th e I Jh e ar in g o n r e m an d . Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 439 F . 3d 59 2, 60 0 (9th C i r. 20 06 ) ( expl ai ni ng that§ 1 25 2(a) (2)( B )( i ) bar s j uri sdi ct i on w hen que s t i on pr e s e nt e d i n m ot i on t o r e ope n i s e s s e nt i a l l ythe s a m e ha r ds hi p gr ound ori gi nal l y dec i ded). T he IJdi d n otabuse hi s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng R am i re z’ s m ot i on for a c o n t i n u a n c e b e c au s e Ra mi r e z d i dn o td e mo n s tr a t e g o o dc au s e . 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 .2 9 ; se e San do val-L un a v. Mukasey , 526 F . 3d 1243, 1247 ( 9th C i r . 2008) (r evi ew i ng for abu se of di sc re t i on ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget
Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Stephen P. Reynolds,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.











Date:  November
      3, 2009/s/Stephen P.
      ReynoldsStephen
      P. ReynoldsPresident
      and
              Chief
      Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-128-01-PB

Michael Nudd

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 2, 2006 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and engage in plea

negotiations or prepare a defense. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to complete discovery and properly prepare for trial, the court

will continue the trial from May 2, 2006 to September 6, 2006. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00128-PB Document 20 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 20, 2006 final pretrial conference is continued

until August 29, 2006 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 18, 2006

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Donald Feith, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00128-PB Document 20 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the Companies) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Stephen P.
Reynolds, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 14, 2003

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Stephen P. Reynolds              
| |                                      
| | Stephen P.Reynolds                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Air Line Pilots Association

International

v. Civil No. 04-cv-331-JD

Guilford Transportation

Industries, Inc., et al.

O R D E R

The plaintiff has moved for leave to file a reply to the

objection to its response to the court’s order to show cause why

this case should not be closed following the First Circuit’s

decision to vacate the injunction issued in this action on

October 13, 2004. The motion is GRANTED. The reply shall

address the issue of the judicial relief, if any, still available

to the plaintiff under the Railway Labor Act. The plaintiff

shall file the reply by June 14, 2005. The defendants shall be

entitled to file a sur-reply on that issue, if they elect to do

so, by June 17, 2005.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

June 7, 2005

cc: R. Matthew Cairns, Esquire

Julie P. Glass, Esquire

Eric L. Hirschhorn, Esquire

Marie M. McPartlin, Esquire

Marcus C. Migliore, Esquire

William G. Miossi, Esquire

Joseph E. Schuler, Esquire

Andrew W. Serell, Esquire

Case 1:04-cv-00331-JD Document 115 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.3

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I, Robert E.
Busch, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, to
the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public
Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2003 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service
Electric and Gas Company.

| | /s/ Robert
  E. Busch                     | 
| | ----------------------------------------- | 
| |                                           | 
| | Robert E.
  Busch                        
| | Public
  Service Electric and Gas Company
| | Chief
  Financial Officer                
| | October 30,
  2003
#### The United States Fidelity *&*Guaranty Co. *v.*City of Toledo et al. The Standard Surety *&*Casualty Co. *v.*City of Toledo et al. The Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. *v.*City of Toledo et al. The Guardian Casualty Co. *v.*City of Toledo et al. The National Surety Co. *v.*City of Toledo et al.

(Nos. 24257, 24258, 24259, 24260 and 24261

Decided October 4, 1933.)

*Messrs. Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar & Martin*and *Mr. Leland L. Lord,*for the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the Standard Surety & Casualty Company and the National Surety Company.

. *Messrs. Denman, Miller $ Beatty,*for the Detroit Fidelity *&*Surety Company.

*Messrs. Fraser, Hiett, Wall & Effler*and *Mr. Howard Jacobson,*for the Guardian Casualty Company.

*Mr. J. I. O’Connor,*director of law, and *Mr. 8am Z. Kaplan,*for the City of Toledo.

*Messrs. Tracy, Chapman & Welles,*for the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland.

*Messrs. Taber, Chittenden & Daniells*and *MrCharles 8. Druggan,*for Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.

*Messrs. Brown & Sanger*and *Mr. Sholto M. Douglas,*for the Security Home Trust Company and Ira J. Fulton, Supt. of Banks,

*404It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Petitions in error dismissed. .*

Weygandt, C. J., Aleen, Stephenson, Bevis, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
June 27, 2018, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement)
during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS
 (Dollar amounts in thousands)
 (Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31,2007(1)
    
    
    2006(1)
    
    
    2006(1)
    
    
    2005(1)
    
    
    2004(1)
    
    
    2003(1)
    
    
    2002(1)Earnings from operations
    
    $
    39,478
    
    
    $
    35,098
    
    
    $
    174,400
    
    
    $
    103,487
    
    
    $
    85,755
    
    
    $
    72,899
    
    
    $
    82,304Add:Interest expense
    
    
    67,293
    
    
    
    45,527
    
    
    
    220,123
    
    
    
    133,578
    
    
    
    101,653
    
    
    
    94,012
    
    
    
    92,964Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    106,771
    
    
    $
    80,625
    
    
    $
    394,523
    
    
    $
    237,065
    
    
    $
    187,408
    
    
    $
    166,911
    
    
    $
    175,268Combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions:Interest expense
    
    $
    67,293
    
    
    $
    45,527
    
    
    $
    220,123
    
    
    $
    133,578
    
    
    $
    101,653
    
    
    $
    94,012
    
    
    $
    92,964Capitalized interest
    
    
    12,887
    
    
    
    12,771
    
    
    
    51,808
    
    
    
    39,111
    
    
    
    23,572
    
    
    
    26,854
    
    
    
    32,377Total fixed charges
    
    
    80,180
    
    
    
    58,298
    
    
    
    271,931
    
    
    
    172,689
    
    
    
    125,225
    
    
    
    120,866
    
    
    
    125,341Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    958
    
    
    
    958
    
    
    
    3,829
    
    
    
    3,831
    
    
    
    10,892
    
    
    
    20,997
    
    
    
    32,185Combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions
    
    $
    81,138
    
    
    $
    59,256
    
    
    $
    275,760
    
    
    $
    176,520
    
    
    $
    136,117
    
    
    $
    141,863
    
    
    $
    157,526Ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and Preferred
Unit distributions
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.1
 
 (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified for all periods
presented.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 1 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 11, 2008 will be:

Formal orders of investigation;

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature;

Amicus consideration; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 4, 2008.

Florence E. Harmon,

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-20957 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34

                        Bonus Plan for Executive Officers

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has engaged a compensation
consultant to advise them in designing a bonus plan for the 2005 fiscal year.
The new plan will replace the bonus plan adopted by the Compensation Committee
in 2004. Under the 2004 plan, the bonus payable to each executive officer was
based on the Company achieving certain annual earnings per share targets that
were set by the Compensation Committee at the time the plan was adopted.

The following table sets forth the range of potential bonuses available for the
executive officers in the event the targets were met and the approximate
distribution of these bonuses within the executive team:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   ANNUAL COMPENSATION
                 --------------------------------------------------------
                          SALARY                      BONUS RANGE
                 as of 1/1/04 as of 1/1/05                2004
                 ------------ ------------    -----------     -----------
<S>              <C>          <C>             <C>             <C>
Greg Daily       $ 300,000    $    300,000    $   250,000  -  $   300,000
Carl Grimstad    $ 225,000    $    300,000    $   250,000  -  $   300,000
Clay Whitson     $ 296,000    $    296,000    $   250,000  -  $   300,000
Bob Torino       $ 205,000    $    205,000    $   150,000  -  $   250,000
Afshin Yazdian   $ 130,000    $    150,000    $   100,000  -  $   150,000
                                              -----------     -----------
 Total                                        $ 1,000,000  -  $ 1,300,000
</TABLE>

The Company's earnings per share under the plan were calculated after giving
effect to potential bonuses, payable in the form of cash, stock options or
restricted stock at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
No. 72-6248.

#### Culp *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6258

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRYAN CORNELIUS WATSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00294-BR-2; 5:11-cv-00640-BR)

Submitted: June 18, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryan Cornelius Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Cornelius Watson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Watson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 32 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 32

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
        relating to equality of rights and reproductive rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

  Mr. Jackson of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
        relating to equality of rights and reproductive rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of gender.
    ``Section 2. Reproductive rights for women under the law shall not 
be denied or abridged by the United States or any State.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall have power to implement and enforce 
this article by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 4. This amendment shall take effect two years after the 
date of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```