alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-57-JD

Gordon Reid

O R D E R

At the hearing held on May 16, 2006, the court provided

Gordon Reid with transcripts of his first trial. He now moves to

be provided with a copy of the transcript of the jury selection

from that trial. In a separate motion, he asks that his standby

counsel be provided with certified transcripts.

Reid argues that he needs a transcript of the jury selection

“for the full development of his double jeopardy claim.” He is

mistaken. “In a jury case, jeopardy attaches when the jury is

empaneled and sworn.” United States v. Pacheco, 434 F.3d 106,

112 (1st Cir. 2006). In Reid’s case, the docket shows that the

jury was sworn on February 13, 2006, and he has a transcript of

that day of trial. He has not shown any need for a transcript of

the jury selection.

Reid states that standby counsel informed him at the hearing

on May 16, 2006, that he did not have a copy of the trial

transcripts. Reid also states that he “does not have a copy that

is certified true and accurate.” He asks that the court provide

Case 1:05-cr-00057-SM Document 305 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

standby counsel “with a copy of the trial transcript certified

true and accurate.” 

To the extent Reid believes that the certification on the

transcripts that he was provided by the court at the hearing on

May 16, 2006, is insufficient and seeks a new copy with a

different certification, that request is denied. Standby counsel

can come to the clerk’s office and pick up the set of trial

transcripts that was originally provided to Reid.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s motion for a

transcript of jury selection (document no. 294) is denied. The

defendant’s motion to provide standby counsel with transcripts

(documents no. 295) is granted to the extent provided in this

order.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

May 31, 2006

cc: Gordon Reid, pro se

Michael J. Iacopino, Esquire

Helen W. Fitzgibbon, Esquire

Clyde R. W. Garrigan, Esquire

U.S. Probation

U.S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00057-SM Document 305 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 14 of 16
30th October /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 139 Filed 10/30/06 Page 16 of 16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               4,991
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               767
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,371
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                6,229
<OTHER-ASSETS>                            157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         13,515
<COMMON>                                1,380
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   3
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        89
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          1,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      56
<PREFERRED>                               137
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    6,431
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                   0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>            351
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             220
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                            0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          4,848
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          13,515
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               2,716
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                      174
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              2,052
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              2,226
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   490
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                         19
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            509
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  220
<NET-INCOME>                              286
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 5
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>             281
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   88
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                 220
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    339
<EPS-BASIC>                              1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.57


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the best
of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.


                                          /s/ E. James Ferland
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          E. James Ferland
                                          PSEG Power LLC
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 1, 2006
<PAGE> 1

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: September 10, 2010

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                                   President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 04-cr-181-PB

Kenneth Knight

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the July 6, 2005 trial

in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional time

to file and argue a motion to suppress in advance of trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 6, 2005 to October 4, 2005. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:04-cr-00181-PB Document 23 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 1, 2005

cc: Stephen Jeffco, Esq.

Mark Howard, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:04-cr-00181-PB Document 23 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.7**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

     I, Thomas M. O’Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C., to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C. on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C. 

/s/ Thomas M. O’Flynn
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget
Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Eric M. Markell, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.











Date:
      May 6, 2008/s/Eric M. MarkellEric
      M. MarkellExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer
**
**Exhibit 31**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John W. DeCero, certifythat: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K, of California Republic Auto Receivables Trust2018-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association, as indenture trustee, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity. 

Date: March 15, 2022 

By:/s/ John W. DeCero

John W. DeCero, Chief Executive Officer 

California Republic Funding LLC, Depositor 
**
r 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Sean Ahern 

v. Case No. 04-cv-474-SM 

United States 

ORDER 

Re: Document No. 26, MOTION under Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 60(b)(5)(6) to Reopen Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

Ruling: The motion is denied, for the reasons given in the 

government’s objection (document no. 27) . The motion is properly 

construed as a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. 

Section 2255. This court is without jurisdiction to consider the 

motion as petitioner has not first obtained permission to file it 

from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. 

Date: August 25, 2011 

cc: Sean Ahern, pro se 

Donald Feith, AUSA 

Case 1:04-cv-00474-SM Document 28 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 1
#### HUGHES et al. v. MISSOURI PAC. R. CO.*

No. 4650.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 29, 1934.

G. P. Rullis, of Vidalia, and L. A. Whit-tington, of Natchez, Miss., for appellants.

Hudson, Potts & Bernstein, of Monroe, and Dale, Dale & Dale, of Vidalia, for appellee.

*

Rebearing denied May 4, 1934.

DREW,- Judge.

Plaintiffs in this suit allege they were passengers, therefore guests, in the car of plaintiff in suit styled Ben Ross v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (La. App.) 153 So. 570. They sue for personal injuries, doctors’, sanitarium bills, medicine, etc. They allege on the same accident as in the case above referred to and allege the same acts of negligence as alleged therein. However, they allege that, they being guests of Ben Ross, his contributory negligence, if he was guilty of any negligence, cannot be imputed to them.

The lower court found that plaintiffs were not guests, but were in the relation of master and servant to Ben Ross, they being the masters, and rejected their demands.»

The' issues in this case are identical with those in No. 4651, and the cases were consolidated for trial below. It is unnecessary for us to pass on the guest question here, due to our finding in case No. 4651, for, under .no circumstances, can the plaintiffs herein recover against the defendant, unless it first be shown that defendant was guilty of negligence which was the proximate cause of the accident. In ease No. 4651, decided to-day, we find that defendant was free of negligence, and that the accident was caused by the negligence of Ben Ross, the driver of the car in which plaintiffs claim to have been guests. Ben Ross is not sued by plaintiffs.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in the above-mentioned case, the demands of plain-, tiffs were correctly rejected by the lower court, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

TALIAFERRO, J., recused.
---

### Industrial Production:  Market Groups

- Data from January 1986 to present
- Industrial Production:  Market Groups and Industry Groups
  Seasonally AdjustedNot Seasonally AdjustedData through 1985
       Industrial Production: Market Groups
	      Seasonally AdjustedNot Seasonally AdjustedDocumentation: This file includes the descriptions of all the series in Table 1A along with the series codes that represent them in the data files.

G.17: Historical Data Home |
Table 1A |
Table 2A |
Table 3 and 4 |
Table 6 | 
Table 7 |
Table 8 |
Table 9|
All Tables|
Relative Importance Weights



G.17:

Release |
Release dates |
About |
ASCII |
PDF (195 KB) |
Home |

Statistical releases

For comments on this site, please fill out our feedback  form.Last update: December 5, 2000
- Data through 1985
- Industrial Production: Market Groups
	      Seasonally AdjustedNot Seasonally AdjustedDocumentation: This file includes the descriptions of all the series in Table 1A along with the series codes that represent them in the data files.

G.17: Historical Data Home |
Table 1A |
Table 2A |
Table 3 and 4 |
Table 6 | 
Table 7 |
Table 8 |
Table 9|
All Tables|
Relative Importance Weights



G.17:

Release |
Release dates |
About |
ASCII |
PDF (195 KB) |
Home |

Statistical releases

For comments on this site, please fill out our feedback  form.Last update: December 5, 2000
- Documentation: This file includes the descriptions of all the series in Table 1A along with the series codes that represent them in the data files.

G.17: Historical Data Home |
Table 1A |
Table 2A |
Table 3 and 4 |
Table 6 | 
Table 7 |
Table 8 |
Table 9|
All Tables|
Relative Importance Weights



G.17:

Release |
Release dates |
About |
ASCII |
PDF (195 KB) |
Home |

Statistical releases

For comments on this site, please fill out our feedback  form.Last update: December 5, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 1, 2012

/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: November 1, 2012



/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Owl Rock Technology Finance Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|                      |        |        |                         |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date: March 10, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Craig W. Packer     |
|                 |   |   | Craig W. Packer         |
|                 |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report on Form 10-K/A of Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter G. Schoonmaker,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

November 30, 2009

 
|   | /s/Peter G. Schoonmaker                |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Peter G. Schoonmaker                   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*).                 

The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period   DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings. 

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2007-0066.                 

*Date Filed:*                     August 19, 2008.                 

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     September 9, 2008.                 

*Description:*                     Application of Hainan Airlines Co. Limited (“Hainan Airlines”) requesting an exemption and amended foreign air carrier permit authorizing it to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or points in the People's Republic of China, on the one hand, and a point or points in the United States, on the other hand, and to engage in other charters. Hainan Airlines also requests a statement of authorization under Part 212 to perform a single charter flight between October 19-21, 2008.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations,  Federal Register Liaison.

 [FR Doc. E8-21054 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 6, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00108

- CR

IN RE Frediz DE LA CRUZ De La Cruz and Elio Enay Rudamas

, Relators

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On February 21, 2022, R elators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes Relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on April 6, 2022

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of April, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Relators’ efforts t o have the Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Presiding Judge of the Sixth Administrative Judicial Region, Kerr County, Texas, to reinstate three county court at law judges “to alleviate the crowded dockets in Kinney County.”