alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 22

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of 
America to prohibit the granting of Presidential reprieves and pardons 
between October 1 of a year in which a Presidential election occurs and 
       January 21 of the year following, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2001

Mr. Frank introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of 
America to prohibit the granting of Presidential reprieves and pardons 
between October 1 of a year in which a Presidential election occurs and 
       January 21 of the year following, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid for all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses 
against the United States shall not be exercised between October 1 of a 
year in which a Presidential election occurs and January 21 of the year 
following; except that after October 1 in said year a President may 
delay the execution of a sentence of death until January 25 of the year 
following.
    ``Section 2. All pardons and reprieves must be announced publicly 
at the time they are granted.''.
                                 <all>
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joseph Paul Jones, * From the 106th District Court

of Dawson County,

Trial Court No. 12-7178.

Vs. No. 11-15-00091-CR * September 17, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michael De Angelis

v. Case No. 04-cv-456-SM

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections

O R D E R

The parties are each ordered to file either their own proposed discovery plan or an

agreed to plan on or before August 8, 2005.

SO ORDERED.

July 12, 2005 _/s/James R. Muirhead_________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Michael De Angelis, pro se

Carolyn Kirby, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00456-SM Document 44 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 15
 
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SHAREHOLDERS
SECURITY CAPITAL PACIFIC TRUST
 
Gentlemen:
 
Re: Registration Statements Nos. 33-25317, 333-4455, and 333-12885
 
  With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 30, 1996 related to
our review of interim financial information.
 
  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
November 11, 1996
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                                PANAVISION INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        THIRD QUARTER ENDED    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                           SEPTEMBER 30,         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                        --------------------  --------------------
                                                                          1997       1996       1997       1996
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                                                     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding...................................     18,155     13,706     18,155     13,706
 
Shares and options considered outstanding for all periods under SAB
  55, using the treasury stock method.................................      1,219      1,571      1,193      1,571
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
  Total...............................................................     19,374     15,277     19,348     15,277
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income............................................................  $   7,577  $   5,671  $  13,961  $   8,098
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income per common share...........................................  $     .39  $     .37  $     .72  $     .53
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
Note: Primary and fully diluted net income per share are the same.
Case 1:05-cr-00148-PB Document 6 Filed 06/20/05 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:05-cr-00148-PB Document 6 Filed 06/20/05 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:05-cr-00148-PB Document 6 Filed 06/20/05 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:05-cr-00148-PB Document 6 Filed 06/20/05 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 35.1


[LOGO] WELLS FARGO                                     Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
       HOME MORTGAGE                                   One Home Campus
                                                       Des Moines, IA 50328-0001


                             Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                          Servicer Compliance Statement

1. I, John B. Brown, Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo") hereby state that a review of the activities of Wells Fargo during the
calendar year 2006 and of Wells Fargo's performance under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on the attached Exhibit A (the "Servicing Agreements") has
been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout 2006, with the exception of the following failure(s) to fulfill any
such obligation in any material respect:

For certain loans sub-serviced by Wells Fargo or for which servicing rights were
acquired on a bulk-acquisition basis, Wells Fargo determined that it provided
incomplete data to some third parties who use such data to calculate delinquency
ratios and the status of loans with respect to bankruptcy, foreclosure or real
estate owned. The incomplete reporting only affected securitizations that
included delinquent loans. Instead of the actual due date being provided for use
in calculating delinquencies, the date of the first payment due to the security
was provided. Wells Fargo subsequently included additional data in monthly
remittance reports, providing the actual borrower due date and unpaid principal
balance, together with instructions to use these new fields if such monthly
remittance reports are used to calculate delinquency ratios.


/s/ John B. Brown
-------------------------
John B. Brown
Senior Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 1, 2007



                                         Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
                                         is a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT A

                                                MASTER SERVICER/
 CLIENT    INV#             INV                      TRUSTEE        DEAL NAME
 ------    ----             ---                      -------        ---------
  106      P47    MORGAN PMSR MSAC 2006-HE3         DEUTSCHE      MSAC 2006-HE3
  106      P48    MORGAN PMSR MSAC 2006-HE4         DEUTSCHE      MSAC 2006-HE4
  106      P51    MORGAN PMSR MSAC 2006-NC4         DEUTSCHE      MSAC 2006-NC4
  106      P54    MORGAN PMSR MSAC 2006-HE5         DEUTSCHE      MSAC 2006-HE5
  106      P61    MORGAN PMSR MSAC 2006-HE6         DEUTSCHE      MSAC 2006-HE6
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44054

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

DAVID PROVENCIO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 719

Filed: October 5, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Steve J. Hippler , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for involuntary manslaughter with a deadly

weapon, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C.

Swinford , Depu ty Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

David Provencio pled guilty to involuntary manslaughter with a deadly weapon . Idaho

Code §§ 18

- 4006(2), 19

- 2520 . The district court sentenced Provencio to a unified term of fifteen

years with fiv e years determinate

. Provencio appeals asserting that the district court abused its

discretion by declining to retain jurisdiction.

The primary purpose of the retained jurisdiction program is to enable the trial court to

obtain additional information regarding the defendant’s rehabilitative potential and suitability for

probation, and probation is the ultimate objective of a defendant who is on retained jurisdiction.2

State v. Chapel , 107 Idaho 193, 687 P.2d 583 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565,

567, 650 P.2d 707, 709 (Ct. App. 1982). There can be no abuse of discretion in a trial court’s

refusal to retain jurisdiction if the court already has sufficient information upon which to

conclude that the defendant is not a suitable cand idate for probation. State v. Beebe , 113 Idaho

977, 979, 751 P.2d 673, 675 (Ct. App. 1988); Toohill , 103 Idaho at 567, 650 P.2d at 709. Based

upon the information that was before the district court at the time of sentencing, we hold that the

district cou rt did not abuse its discretion when it declined to retain jurisdiction.

Therefore, Provencio ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. CR. 05-156-01-SM

George Curran,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Curran’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document no. 8). Defendant Curran has filed a Waiver of

Speedy Trial. Trial has been rescheduled for the month of January 2006. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:05-cr-00156-SM Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for December 16, 2005 at 

4:00 p.m. in Room 421. 

Jury selection will take place on January 4, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 18, 2005

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Debra M. Walsh, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00156-SM Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:04-cr-00197-SM Document 40 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cr-00197-SM Document 40 Filed 06/13/05 Page 2 of 2
Order entered December 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01456-CV

SLOAN CREEK II, L.L.C., Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-3356-2008

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s December 20, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time 

to file its brief. Appellant shall file it brief by January 19, 2015. We caution appellant that no 

further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-64-01-SM

Timothy Tremblay

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document

no. 17) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2006

trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights

not later than April 27, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective. No further continuances except on

showing of unavoidable necessity.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that

failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation

taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Case 1:05-cr-00064-SM Document 18 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: July 21, 2006 at 4:30 PM 

Jury Selection: August 1, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

April 18, 2006 

_________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Mark Irish, Esq.

 Jonathan Saxe, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00064-SM Document 18 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-95-01-PB 

Cushaw Baracek Barnett

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I recuse myself from this case and direct the clerk to assign 

it to another judge. 

SO ORDERED. 

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro 

United States District Judge 

March 13, 2012 

cc: Cushaw Barnett, Pro Se 

 United States Attorney 

 United States Probation 

 United States Marshal 

 

Case 1:05-cr-00095-SM Document 130 Filed 03/13/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION



I, David Morris, Principal Executive Officer of Blink Logic Inc. (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 18, 2009 |  | /s/David Morris
David Morris
President & Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 1, 2013



/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President(Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: November 1, 2013



/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer(Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
Section 302 Certification

I, Joseph D. Hamilburg, Chairman and Co- Chief Executive Officer of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plymouth
Rubber Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date: October 14, 2003                  /s/ Joseph D. Hamilburg
                                            Joseph D. Hamilburg
                                    Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of Publix Super Markets, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 28, 2009 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, David P. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that on the date hereof:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David P. Phillips                
|David P. Phillips                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|May 7, 2009