alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000081100
<NAME> PUGET SOUND ENERGY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,311,315
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    279,305
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         268,253
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 610,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,468,965
<COMMON>                                       845,606
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      466,498
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             47,746
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,359,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           73,162
<PREFERRED>                                     95,488
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,571,728
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             215,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   1,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   46,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,106,237
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,468,965
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      887,594
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            51,786
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     686,537
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     738,323
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        149,271
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               4,671
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 153,942
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        68,396
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,546
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      6,558
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   78,988
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        77,796
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       58,398
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         230,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                               CITICORP CAPITAL X

      This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of January 28, 1997 for the
purpose of organizing a business trust pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust
Act, 12 Del. C. ss. ss. 3801 et. seq. (the "Act").

      The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

      1. Name. The name of the business trust is "Citicorp Capital X" (the
"Trust").

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Delaware
resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the
Act are as follows:

                      Wilmington Trust Company
                      Rodney Square North
                      1100 North Market Street
                      Wilmington, Delaware 19890

      3. Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately
upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the
Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year first
above written.

                                               WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
                                               as Delaware Trustee


                                               /s/ Norma P. Closs
                                               ------------------------
                                               Name: Norma P. Closs
                                               Title:   Vice President


                                               /s/ Peter Gallant
                                               ------------------------
                                               Name: Peter Gallant
                                               Trustee


                                               /s/ Ann Goodbody
                                               ------------------------
                                               Name:  Ann Goodbody
                                               Trustee
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jeffrey Winston Forrest, * From the 350th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 11750-D.

Vs. No. 11-21-00062-CR * March 2, 2023

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgments below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgments of the trial court are in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 20 (legislative day, December 18), 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-44 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu

thereof ``January 10, 2002''; and by striking the date specified in 
section 123 and inserting in lieu thereof ``January 1, 2002''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT (4)(xix)

      TRANSLATION OF THE EXTRACT FROM THE PUBLIC DEED
                   PROVIDED BY THE BANK
                   PERSONAL GUARANTEE


PLYMOUTH RUBBER COMPANY, INC. a U.S.
Corporation incorporated under the Laws of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts, domiciled in Canton, Massachusetts, 104
Revere Street MA 02021, and duly registered at the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (USA) under number 482350
shall answer jointly with PLYMOUTH RUBBER EUROPA
 (the "Borrower") of the obligations contained in the Loan Agreement  
signed by the Borrower and CAJA MUNICIPAL DE AHORROS DE VIGO, 
BANCO DE BILBAO VIZCAYA, S.A. y BANCO DEL COMERCIO, S.A., 
expressly renouncing to the privileges of order, "excusion"  and division.

The present guarantee is also subject to the following
rules:

1.  The guarantee is extended to any and all the
 obligations of the borrower contemplated in the present
 agreement.

2.  The guarantee shall remain in force for as long as the
 obligations it guarantees have not been totally cancelled.

3.  The guarantors hereby expressly accept, in all their
 effects, all the extensions of the payment periods or all
 other payment facilities which the lending institutions may
 grant to the borrower"


_______________________________
1 This "privilege" refers to the creditor's obligation to
demand payment first from the borrower and then, once this
has been done, from the guarantors. Renouncing this implies
that the creditor may demand payment from any of the
guarantors of the borrower without any pre-established
order of preference. This renouncing is standard in most
personal guarantees.
2 This refers to the obligation of the creditor to
demonstrate that the borrower has no resources with which
to pay the debt, before he proceeds against the guarantors.
This necessity is hereby renounced. This is standard
practice in guarantees such as this one.
3 The "privilege" of division granted to the guarantors
means that, if there were to be more than one guarantor,
the guaranteed debt shall be divided in as many parts as
guarantors are, and each of them shall only respond up to
his corresponding amount. This privilege is hereby
renounced being the creditor thus allowed to claim the
total amount of the debt from any of the guarantors.
4 This clause is included because, in accordance to Spanish
Law, if the lender and borrower extend the payment period
for longer than originally convened, the guarantors are not
obliged by this additional period, but their guarantee is
expires on the date initially convened. In order to avoid
the cancellation of the guarantees if additional time for
payment is granted by the banks, this clause normally is
inserted.
Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 7 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 3Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 7 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 3Case 1:05-cv-00219-SM Document 7 Filed 06/24/05 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-171-01-SM

Kimberly Baez

O R D E R

On March 29, 2012, the defendant appeared for an initial

appearance on a supervised release violation dated March 22,

2012. The defendant stipulated to “probable cause” and requested

a detention hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6), the defendant bears the burden of

establishing by clear and convincing evidence that she will not

flee and that she poses no danger to any other person or to the

community. Based on the content of the supervised release

violation as well as the proffers presented at the hearing, and

for the reasons thoroughly stated on the record, the court finds

the defendant has failed to meet this burden and that there are

no conditions that are likely to assure (1) the defendant will

not flee, or (2) the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending a final revocation hearing. The final revocation hearing

is scheduled before Judge McAuliffe on May 8, 2012 at 1:30pm.

Case 1:05-cr-00171-SM Document 59 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 2
The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Daniel J. Lynch

Daniel J. Lynch

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 29, 2012

cc: Counsel of Record

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

2

Case 1:05-cr-00171-SM Document 59 Filed 03/29/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HERDER SPRING HUNTING CLUB,

 Respondent

 v.

HARRY KELLER AND ANNA KELLER,

HIS WIFE; J. ORVIS KELLER; ELLIS O.

KELLER; HENRY HARRY KELLER;

WILLIAM H. KELLER; MARY EGOLF;

JOHN KELLER; HARRY KELLER; ANNA

BULLOCK; ALLEN EGOLF; MARTIN

EGOLF; MARY LYNN COX; ROBERT

EGOLF; NATHAN EGOLF; ROBERT S.

KELLER; BETTY BUNNELL; ANN K.

BUTLER; MARGUERITE TOSE; HENRY

PARKER KELLER; PENNY ARCHIBALD;

HEIDI SUE HUTCHISON; REBECCA

SMITH; ALEXANDRA NILES

CALABRESE; CORRINE GRAHAM

FISHERMAN; JENNIFER LAYTON

MANRIQUE; DAVID KELLER; STEPHEN

RICHARD KELLER; MICHAEL EGOLF,

THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS,

EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND

ASSIGNS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER

PERSON, PARTY OR ENTITY,

 Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 556 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issues are:

M.D. Appeal Dkt.

5 2015

FILED

1/27/2015

Supreme Court

Middle District
[556 MAL 2014] - 2

(1) By failing to strictly construe [72 P.S. § 5020-409] and by ignoring and/or

misconstruing this Court’s prior holdings, did the Superior Court err in

ruling that a tax sale that occurred thirty-six years after the duly recorded

severance of the subsurface oil and gas estate extinguished [p]etitioners’

interests where the tax deed and related documents described the

assessed property as being that held by the then[-]unseated surface

estate owner and when it is undisputed that there was no prior production

or other basis upon which a valid assessment could be made of the

reserved oil and natural gas interests?

(2) Did the Superior Court deny the [p]etitioners’ due process rights under the

United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions when it held that the 1935

tax sale divested [p]etitioners of their properly reserved oil and natural gas

interests?

(3) Did the Superior Court overlook controlling authority which provides that a

grantee is bound by prior exceptions and reservations cited in its deed?

(4) Did the Superior Court exceed the scope of its appellate authority by

making a factual finding that the Kellers never notified the Centre County

Commissioners of their severed oil and gas estate when the trial court

found that there was no evidence one way or another as to whether such

notice was provided?
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mel Carlisle , the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    Mel CarlisleName:    Mel CarlisleDate: December 19, 2018
USDCNH-95 (6-04)

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

NOTICE OF REMOVED DOCUMENT

This document was ordered to be removed from the docket.

 JAMES R. STARR

Clerk

Case 1:05-cv-00170-JD Document 10 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated.


                                   /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                   Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   April 30, 2004
Case 1:05-cv-00233-JD   Document 14   Filed 10/14/05   Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

George Nnaji

Criminal No . 04-220-01-JD

ORDER REMITTING ASSESSMENT

Upon petition of the United States of America under the

provisions of 18 U .S .C . § 3573 for remission of the balance of

the unpaid assessment imposed upon the defendant named above and

the Court being sufficiently advised herein, it is hereb y

ORDERED, that the unpaid portion of the assessment imposed

against the defendant in the amount of $200 .00 is remitted .

DATED : April 18, 2008

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

U .S . District Court Judge

Case 1:04-cr-00220-JD Document 27 Filed 04/18/08 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Leonard E. Price, Petitioner, v Frederick M. Marshall, as Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously dismissed *(see, People v Price,*163 AD2d 915 [decided herewith]). (Original art 78 proceeding.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7682
PAUL K. MCINTURFF, Petitioner - Appellant, versusTHOMAS R. CORCORAN, Mr. Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1556-H) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul K. McInturff, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul McInturff appeals the filing of the Respondents' response to his habeas corpus petition, the district court order granting McInturff in forma pauperis status and ordering the Respondents to show cause why the writ should not be granted, and the districtcourt's order granting McInturff thirty days to respond to the Respondents' response. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U .S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders and filings here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. We deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceedin forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION

          - [A-428-602]

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 10, 2008.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joy Zhang or James Terpstra, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1168 and (202) 482-3965, respectively.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 20, 2008, the Department of Commerce published                     *Brass Sheet and Strip from Germany: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review*, 71 FR 49170 (August 20, 2008), in the                     **Federal Register**                    . We are amending this notice to correct a typographical error in identifying the period of review. The correct period of review is March 1, 2007 through February 29, 2008.                

This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

Dated: September 4, 2008.

Stephen J. Claeys,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. E8-21027 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Training and 
Education Grant Applications.
    Date: October 29-30, 2008.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Loews Annapolis Hotel, 126 West Street, Annapolis, MD 
21401.
    Contact Person: Laurie Friedman Donze, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for 
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43272c2d39262f032e222a2f6d2d2a2b6d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b6f6465716e674b666a626725656263256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 9, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-21502 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mrs. Enid PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOYE BROS. YELLOW CAB CO. et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17732.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 31, 1942.

For former opinion, see 8 So.2d 562.

Clay & Kohlman, of New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

A. D. Danziger, of New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

SIMON, Judge.

A careful reconsideration of this matter convinces us that our former opinion and decree are correct and that they should be reinstated.

For the reasons assigned, our original opinion and decree herein are reinstated as the final judgment of this court. '

Original decree reinstated.