alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-215-05-PB

Christopher Stallings

and Larry Stallings

O R D E R

Christopher Stallings has moved to continue the June 5, 2007

trial in the above case in order to allow additional time to

arrange for out-of-state witnesses to testify at trial. The

Government and co-defendant, Larry Stallings, do not object to a

continuance of the trial period to June 19, 2007. 

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 5, 2007 to June 19, 2007. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00215-PB Document 109 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 21, 2007

cc: Donald Feith, AUSA

R.P. Cornelius, Esq.

William T. Cornelius, Esq.

William Christie, Esq.

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Paul Pappas, Esq.

Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Michael Smith, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00215-PB Document 109 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 35.1**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National Association,as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee,  the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-5 Trust for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”):

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                                                     /s/ H. John Berens

| ___________________________________________Name:  H. John BerensTitle:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00182

- CV

Crystal SMITH

, Appellant

v.

Joseph HICKMAN

, Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI19228

Honorable Solomon Casseb III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the final divorce decree is REVERSED

with the exception of the provision granting the divorce and dissolving the marri age, and the cause

is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. It is ORDERED that appellant Crystal

Smith recover her costs of the appeal from appellee Joseph Hickman.

SIGNED March 25, 2020.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report: August 4, 2020(Date of earliest event reported)CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Ohio0-460431-0746871(State or other jurisdiction  of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)6200 S. Gilmore RoadFairfield,Ohio45014‐5141(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (513) 870-2000N/A(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon stockCINFNasdaq Global Select MarketCheck the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-4(c))Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§203.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).☐ Emerging growth company☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.Item 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureOn August 4, 2020, Cincinnati Financial Corporation posted presentation slides in PDF format on cinfin.com/investors that will be used in investor presentations beginning August 5, 2020. Exhibit 99.1 is a copy of the slides. The slides are being furnished pursuant to Item 7.01, and the information contained therein shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. This report should not be deemed an admission as to the materiality of any information contained in the investor presentation slides.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.(c)  ExhibitsExhibit 99.1 –  Investor presentation slidesExhibit 104 – The cover page from this Current Report on Form 8-K, formatted as Inline XBRLSignaturePursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDate: August 4, 2020/S/ Michael J. SewellMichael J. Sewell, CPAChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.2 



 

 


Performance Criteria
for the 2005-2007 Cycle 






under the
Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan 







        For
the 2005-2007 cycle, the performance criteria under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive
Plan, which criteria were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
Board of Directors, relate to improvements in earnings per share and return on invested
capital.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Winston C. Yen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

| Dated: February 1, 2010 | By:           | /s/ Winston C. Yen                                                                     |
|-------------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |     | Winston C. Yen

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer ) |

 

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 10007 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16

- cr - 00028

- JRH

- BKE

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus MICHAEL BERNARD JOHNSON, Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________ _________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ ( October 20, 2017 ) Before MARCUS , JORDAN and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 17-10007 Date Filed: 10/20/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Brandon N. Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Bernard Johnson i n this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr. Johnson and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although the brief does not satisfy the requirements of an Anders brief, see , e.g. , Uni ted States v. Edwards , 822 F.2d 1012, 1013 (11 th Cir. 1987), our independent and plenary review of the entire record reveals that Mr. Fleming’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Mr. Fleming’s motion to withdraw is G RANTED , and Mr. Johnson’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED
. Case: 17-10007 Date Filed: 10/20/2017 Page: 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-11200

Conference Calendar

 

RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAM PRATT, Warden; P. CHILDS, Jail Administrator, Federal

Detention Center, Seagoville; NFN ANDERSON, Unit Manager, FCI,

Seagoville; D. CROWE, Unit Five Case Manager, FCI,

Seagoville; NFN PRICE, Unit Five Counselor, FCI, Seagoville;

NFN FARLEY, Special Investigation Services Agent, FCI,

Seagoville; WILLIAM MOBLEY, Disciplinary Hearing

Administrator, BOP, South Central Regional Office, Dallas,

TX,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CV-210-L

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodolfo Rodriguez, former federal prisoner # 47735-079,

appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his

civil rights complaint as frivolous and for seeking monetary

relief from defendants who are immune from such relief pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii).
No. 01-11200

-2-

Rodriguez has failed to brief the relevant issue, as he has

provided neither argument nor authorities to show that the

district court erred in dismissing his suit. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, this

appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

“prohibits a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 

if he has had three actions or appeals dismissed for

frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim.” 

Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1997)(citing

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996)). The

district court’s dismissal of Rodriguez’ complaint as frivolous

and this court’s dismissal of his appeal as frivolous both count

as “strikes” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba,

103 F.3d at 388. Rodriguez is warned that if he accumulates a

third “strike,” he will no longer be allowed to proceed IFP in

any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Rodriguez has also moved this court for appointment of

counsel to represent him on appeal. That motion is DENIED.

 APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED;

SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

PVP-Salem Associates, L.P.

v. Civil No. 04-cv-386-JD

Parlex Corporation

PROCEDURAL ORDER

The court met with counsel on this date to discuss the

scheduled trial, the possibility of settlement, and the

defendant’s motion to file a counterclaim. The court indicated

that in its opinion this is a case that should settle and urged

counsel to recommend strongly to their clients that they take a

realistic view of the case and arrive at a negotiated resolution. 

In the event the case cannot settle, then counsel shall file a

stipulation setting forth deadlines to complete the discovery and

motion practice on the issues raised by the counterclaim.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

April 10, 2006

cc: Anthony S. Augeri, Esquire

R. David DePuy, Esquire

Edward A. Haffer, Esquire

Edward D. Kutchin, Esquire

Kerry R. Northrup, Esquire

Case 1:04-cv-00386-JD Document 52 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 1
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Richard L. Peteka, Chief Financial Officer of SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SCP Private CreditIncome BDC LLC; 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 
 5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 a.
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated this 21st day of February, 2019 
/s/ Richard L. Peteka**Richard L. Peteka****
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6735-6736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-921-03-1320-EL; COC-072168]


Notice of Invitation for Coal Exploration License Application, 
Bowie Resources, LLC. COC-072168; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Invitation for Coal Exploration License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 2(b) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, 
as amended, by section 4 of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 
1976, Stat. 1083, 30 U.S.C. 201(b), and to the regulations adopted as 
43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 3410, all interested parties 
are hereby invited to participate with Bowie Resources, LLC, on a pro 
rata cost sharing basis in a program for the exploration of unleased 
coal deposits owned by the United States of America in Delta County, 
Colorado:

T 12 S, R 91, 6th P.M. in Delta County, Colorado.
    Sec. 27, S2, NW1/4, S2NE;

    Containing 560 acres.


DATES: Any party electing to participate in this exploration program 
must send written notice to both the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
and Bowie Resources, LLC, as provided in the ADDRESSES section below, 
no later than 30 days after publication of this invitation in the 
Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the exploration plan and license application 
(serialized

[[Page 6736]]

under the number of COC-072069) are available for review during normal 
business hours in the public room of the BLM State Office, 2850 
Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215, and at the Uncompahgre 
Field Office, 2505 South Townsend Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401. The 
written notice to participate in the exploration plan should be sent to 
both Kurt M. Barton, CO-921, Solid Minerals Staff, Division of Energy, 
Lands and Minerals, Colorado State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 
2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215; and, Collin Stewart, 
Bowie Resources, LLC, P.O. Box 483, Paonia, CO 81428.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This coal exploration license will be issued 
by the BLM. The exploration program is fully described and is being 
conducted pursuant to an exploration plan approved by the BLM. The plan 
may be modified to accommodate the legitimate exploration needs of 
persons seeking to participate. This notice of invitation to 
participate was published in The Delta County Independent, once a week 
for two consecutive weeks during the month of February 2008, and in the 
Federal Register. The foregoing is published in the Federal Register 
pursuant to 43 CFR 3410.2-1 (c)(1).

Kurt M. Barton,
Solid Minerals Staff, Division of Energy, Lands and Minerals.
 [FR Doc. E8-2032 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30472 Summary Calendar

LARRY J. THIBODEAUX, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF EUNICE; VARDEN GUILLORY, SR.; TRACY CHADDICK; ANDREA DARBY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1206

- - - - - - - - - - February 4, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry J. Thibodeaux appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his civil rights complaint. Thibodeaux argues that he was wrongfully arrested, that he was subjected to unlawful fingerprinting and incarceration, that he was not advised of his Sixth Amendment rights, and that his bond was excessive. Thibodeaux also asserts that two Eunice city court clerks’ refusal to file certainNo. 97-30472 -2- pretrial motions in the resulting proceeding amounted to a denial-of-access-to-the-courts claim. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we conclude that Thibodeaux’s argument is frivolous for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. See Thibodeaux v. City of Eunice et al. , No. 96-1206 (W.D. La. Apr. 29, 1997). Additionally, Thibodeaux has failed to show that the district court’s decision denying his request to amend his complaint was an abuse of discretion. See Rolf v. City of San Antonio , 77 F.3d 823, 828 (5th Cir. 1996). Thibodeaux’s assertion that the district court erred by denying his request that the defendants be informed of a purported conflict of interest with their attorney is without merit. Nor has Thibodeaux shown that the district court abused its discretion by granting the defendants’ motion to compel discovery and by assessing attorneys’ fees of $250 against Thibodeaux for his initial refusal to respond to the discovery requests. See Richardson v. Henry , 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir. 1990). Thibodeaux’s appeal is without arguable merit, and it is therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). It is therefore DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. His request for permission to file an amended notice of appeal is
DENIED. The appellees’ motion for the imposition of damages is GRANTED and we remand to the district court for an assessment ofNo. 97-30472 -3- double costs and attorney’s fees for this frivolous appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 38.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL DENIED; MOTION FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO FED. R. APP. P. 38 GRANTED; REMAND TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ASSESSMENT OF DOUBLE COSTS AND DAMAGES.