alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         543,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,096,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,475
<INVENTORY>                                    611,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,265,257
<PP&E>                                      14,984,221
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,347,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,691,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,823,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       708,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,027
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,691,206
<SALES>                                      6,564,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,635,474
<CGS>                                        5,477,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,477,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,828,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (936,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   302,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (634,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (634,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
#### Carol Vernam, Appellant, v Hyster Company, Respondent.

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Duskas, J.), entered May 12, 1989 in St. Lawrence County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for damages resulting from a forklift accident at her place of employment located in St. Lawrence County. The complaint alleges, *inter alia,*causes of action sounding in negligence and products liability brought against defendant, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State and the alleged manufacturer and distributor of the forklift. Defendant asserted, *inter alia,*lack of personal jurisdiction as an affirmative defense in its answer and then moved for summary judgment on, *inter alia,*the same ground, claiming that it was improperly served with process. This portion of defendant’s motion went unopposed by plaintiff and Supreme Court, without opinion, subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant’s motion, inasmuch as it was based on a lack of personal jurisdiction and supported by affidavits, went unopposed, entitling defendant in this instance to summary judgment *(see, GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales,*108 AD2d 86, 91, *affd*66 NY2d 965; *see also, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). We further note that plaintiff did not address the issue of personal jurisdiction in her brief on appeal.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.25c

    Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Plan for Non-Employee
                     Directors of Playboy Enterprises, Inc.

The Plan is amended by deleting the existing Section 4(c) thereof in its
entirety and replacing such section with a new Section 4(c), as follows:

(c) Each Award of Option Rights shall specify the form of consideration to be
paid in satisfaction of the Option Price and the manner of payment of such
consideration, which may include (i) cash in the form of currency or check or
other cash equivalent acceptable to the Company, (ii) nonforfeitable,
nonrestricted shares of Common Stock, which are already owned by the Optionee
and have a value at the time of exercise that is equal to the Option Price,
(iii) any other legal consideration that the Board may deem appropriate,
including, without limitation, any form of consideration authorized under
Section 4(d) below, on such basis as the Board may determine in accordance with
this Plan, and (iv) any combination of the foregoing. In addition, the Board
may, in its discretion and whether or not specified in an Award of Option
Rights, permit payment of the Option Price by a "net exercise" via the
forfeiture to the Company of a portion of the Option Rights pertaining to shares
of Common Stock with a value (based on the Market Value per Share on the date of
such forfeiture) equal to the exercise price of the portion of the Option Rights
being exercised plus the applicable tax withholding amount.
Exhibit 99.2



Consent of Neoway Business Solutions



We hereby consent to (1) the use of and
all references to the name of Neoway Business Solutions in the annual report on Form 20-F of StoneCo Ltd. (the “Company”)
and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”) and any other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
any correspondence with the SEC by the Company; including, but not limited to, the use of the information supplied by us and set
forth under the section “Item 4.—Information on the Company—B. Business overview”; and (2) the filing
of this consent as an exhibit to any such filings with the SEC by the Company.



Sincerely,



|By:    | /s/ Andrew Thomas Campbell | 
|------ | -------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Andrew Thomas Campbell     | 
|Title: |                            | 





April 26,
2019
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxco, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Max A. Coon, as Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: August
                14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Max
              A.
              CoonMax
                A. Coon
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2112

BUDI WIJAJA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-728-196)

Submitted: March 14, 2005 Decided: March 28, 2005

 

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard T. Mei, LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD T. MEI, ESQUIRE, Bethesda,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jerome W.

MacLaughlin, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Budi Wijaja, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture. By prior order, we dismissed

the portion of Wijaja’s appeal pertaining to his request for

asylum. 

While we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of

Wijaja’s asylum claim, we retain jurisdiction to consider the

denial of his request for withholding of removal and relief under

the Convention Against Torture. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a) (2004).

“To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that

he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race,

religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or

political opinion.” Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir.

2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on

our review of the record, we find that Wijaja failed to meet these

standards.

We also find that Wijaja failed to meet the standard for

relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such

relief, an applicant must “establish that it is more likely than

not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed
- 3 -

country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004). We find

that Wijaja fails to make the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                                
                               PINKERTON'S, INC.
                                        
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)

                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                        


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           FOR THE QUARTER ENDED         FOR THE SIX PERIODS ENDED
                                       -----------------------------   -----------------------------
 
                                       JUNE 13, 1997   JUNE 14, 1996   JUNE 13, 1997   JUNE 14, 1996
                                       -------------   -------------   -------------   -------------
<S>                                    <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income                                    $2,715          $3,047          $4,696          $4,756
                                              ======          ======          ======          ======
 
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding                     8,366           8,347           8,365           8,347
 
Dilutive effect of outstanding
 stock options                                   289             216             273             138
                                              ------          ------          ------          ------
 
Weighted average number of
 common shares, as adjusted,
 for calculation of earnings
 per share                                     8,655           8,563           8,638           8,485
                                              ======          ======          ======          ====== 
Net income per common share                   $  .31          $  .36          $  .54          $  .56
                                              ======          ======          ======          ======
</TABLE>
----

----

EXHIBIT 32.2

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | TETRAGENEX      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | By:                                   | /s/      Neil Martucci |   |
|   |                                  | Neil      Martucci |   |
|   |                                  | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|   |                                  |   |   |
|   | March      31, 2009                   |   |

----
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted September 19, 2012

Decided September 20, 2012

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS

, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 12

‐ 2204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY WASHINGTON,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 11

‐ CR

‐ 119

‐ BBC

‐ 01

Barbara B. Crabb,

Judge

.

O R D E R

While serving a 360

‐ month sentence on crack distribution charges, federal inmate

Timothy Washington stabbed a fellow inmate 16 times with a metal shank. Washington

pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to assault with a dangerous weapon and intent

to do bodily harm, 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). The district court sentenced him to 33 months’

imprisonment—the bottom of his guidelines range. Washington filed a notice of appeal, but

his counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw. See Anders v.

California

, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Washington has not accepted our invitation to respond to

counsel’s motion. See C IR

. R. 51(b). We confine our review to those issues identified in

counsel’s facially adequate brief. See United States v. Schuh

, 289 F.3d 968, 973–74 (7th Cir.

2002). 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 12

‐ 2204 Page 2

Counsel first notes that Washington does not want to challenge his guilty plea and

thus properly refrains from discussing whether the plea was knowing and voluntary. See

United States v. Knox

, 287 F.3d 667, 670–72 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel next considers whether it would be frivolous for Washington to challenge

his 33

‐ month sentence. Counsel correctly notes that the term is neither based on an incorrect

calculation of the sentencing guidelines nor in excess of the ten

‐ year statutory maximum, see

18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). As counsel recognizes, we would presume that Washington’s

within

‐ guidelines sentence is reasonable, see Rita v. United States

, 551 U.S. 338, 350–51 (2007);

United States v. Pape

, 601 F.3d 743, 746 (7th Cir. 2010), and counsel cannot identify any

reason to disturb that presumption. The district court adequately discussed the relevant

sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), noting the severity of the injuries of

Washington’s victim and the threat that the assault posed to the safety of the prison

generally, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1). In fact, the district court considered Washington’s

criminal history “clearly undercredited” by his criminal history score but nevertheless

declined to increase his sentence in light of the lengthy prison term remaining for his

original offense.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with PVC Container Corporation (the "Company") Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.

Date: May 17, 2004

                                             s/Phillip L. Friedman
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Phillip L. Friedman
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                             s/Jeffrey Shapiro
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Jeffrey Shapiro
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

                                                                              22
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION

 (Dollars in Thousands)

                                                     Unaudited
                                                  Nine months ended
                                                    September 30   

                                                  1996      1995
 <S>                                              <C>       <C>
 Source of Cash:
     Net income                                   $616      $625

     Decrease in accounts payable                    -       (10)

          Cash provided from operations           $616      $615


 Use of Cash:

     Dividends paid                                619       619

     Increase (decrease) in cash                  $ (5)     $ (6)

</TABLE>



Notes:

     (1)  The foregoing interim financial statements are unaudited but, 
          in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments
          necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations
          for the interim periods.

     (2)  Registrant has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a
          real estate investment trust. As such, the Trust is exempt
          from paying federal corporate income tax on any income that is
          distributed to shareholders. It has been Registrant's policy
          to distribute annually all of its ordinary taxable income.
          Consequently, no provision has been made for federal income
          tax.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                    DESCRIPTION OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

     Park National Corporation ("Park") adopted the Park National Corporation
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or "SERP" in December 1996. The SERP
currently benefits 31 current and former officers of Park and its subsidiaries,
including: (a) William T. McConnell, who serves as Chairman of the Executive
Committee of the Board of Directors of each of Park and The Park National Bank,
a subsidiary of Park ("PNB"), and had served as Chairman of the Board of each of
Park and PNB from 1994 until December 31, 2004; (b) C. Daniel DeLawder, who
serves as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of each of Park and
PNB, and had served as President of each of Park and PNB from 1994 until
December 31, 2004; and (c) John W. Kozak, who serves as Chief Financial Officer
of Park and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PNB. David
L. Trautman, who serves as President and Secretary of Park and as President of
PNB, and had served as Executive Vice President of PNB from February 2002 until
December 31, 2004, does not participate in the SERP.

     The SERP is a non-qualified benefit plan designed to restore benefits lost
due to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on the
amount of compensation covered by and the benefits payable under a defined
benefit plan such as the Park National Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan.
Park has purchased life insurance contracts to fund the SERP. The SERP is
designed to provide a monthly retirement benefit of approximately $5,000,
$10,500 and $500 for Messrs. McConnell, DeLawder and Kozak, respectively. These
additional benefits are not guaranteed and are dependent upon the earnings from
the related life insurance contracts compared to the average yield on
three-month Treasury bills. The SERP also provides a life insurance benefit to a
current or former officer of Park or one of its subsidiaries participating in
the SERP who dies before age 86. The amount of this life insurance benefit will
be equal to the present value of the stream of future benefits which would have
been paid to the individual until age 86 but had not been paid at the time of
the individual's death.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence A.
Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
-------------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)                       November 14, 2008

<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.