alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 01 -15-00636- CR

In the 

### Court of Appeals

for the


### First District of Texas

At Houston



No . 1409330

In the 23 2nd District Court Of Harris County, Texas





## IRVIN NOTIAS
Appellant

v. 

## THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee





### STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IN WHICH TO FILE AN APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules

10.5(b)(1) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this

motion for an extension of tim e in which to file the State’s B rief in this cause, and,

in support thereof, presents the following: ACCEPTED
01-15-00636-CR
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
11/12/2015 4:14:52 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK1. On June 30, 2015, appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery

with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 40 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

.

2. Appellant filed a timely written notice of appeal.

3

. The State’s B rief i s due on November 1 2 , 2015

.

4

. An extension of time in which to file the S tate’s B rief is requested until

December 1 4 , 2015

. No previous ex tensions have been granted.

5

. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the requested

extension :

i. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation
of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 01

- 15

- 00226

- CR

, Weylin Wayne Alford

, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee , which

was filed on November 11 , 2015.

ii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation
of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 14

- 15

- 00740

- CR, Russell Levi Pope, Appellant v. The Stat e of Texas, Appellee , which was filed on October 30, 2015.

iii. The undersigned attorney has been engaged in the preparation
of the State’s Brief in Cause No. 14

- 15

- 00 2 51

- CR, Derek

James Strimban , Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

, which is due to be filed on November 16 , 2015

.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an additional

extension of time until December 1 4 , 2015 in which to file the State’s B rief in this

cause.Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Heather A. Hudson

H EATHER A. H UDSON Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826

State Bar No. 24058991 hudson_heather@dao.hctx.net curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been submitted

for service by e

- filing t o the following address:

Joseph W. Varela

2500 East T.C. Jester Blvd.

Suite 247 Houston, Texas 77008 (713) 957

- 0440 jwvarela@gmail.com

/s/ Heather A. Hudson

H EATHER A. H UDSON Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826

State Bar No. 24058991

Date: November 12, 2015
Exhibit 31.1

Section 302 Certification

I, Maurice J. Hamilburg, President and Co- Chief Executive Officer
of Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plymouth
Rubber Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this  report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

(b) [Omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 12, 2004         /s/ Maurice J. Hamilburg
                             --------------------------
                                Maurice J. Hamilburg
                        President and Co-Chief Executive
                                      Officer
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00441-SM Document 1-1 Filed 11/23/04 Page 11 of 11
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018(the “Report”) of SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 /s/ Michael S. Gross**Name:** Michael S. Gross**Date:** February 21, 2019**
| 001-11001                                | 06-0619596                        |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (Commission File Number)                 | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                                     |                              |
| 3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut | 06905                             |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)                        |

|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 8.01 | Other Events |
|-----------|--------------|

| Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits |
|-----------|-----------------------------------|

|   | 99.1 | Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on November 22, 2011. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|                               | FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                               |                                |
| Date:  November 23, 2011 | By:/s/ Susana D’Emic          |
|                               | Susana D’Emic                 |
|                               | Senior Vice President and           |
|                               | Controller                          |
|                               |                                |
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                             September 30   December 31
                                                 1996           1995   

ASSETS
     <S>                                          <C>            <C>
     Rentals receivable under capital lease       $9,150         $9,150
     Cash                                             19             24

                                                  $9,169         $9,174
     

LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

     Liabilities:
          Accounts payable and
            accrued liabilities                   $   18         $   18

     Shareholder's equity:

          Shares of beneficial interest, at
            no par value, 1,510,000 shares
            issued and outstanding                 9,145          9,145
          Income retained in business                  6             11

               Total Shareholders' Equity          9,151          9,156

               Total Liabilities and
                 Shareholders' Equity             $9,169         $9,174
</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000316

31-AUG-2017

09:42 AM
#### Glucksman v Halsey Drug Co. (And Another Action.)

Motion for reargument granted to extent of deleting first full paragraph on second page of memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order (160 AD2d 305, 306) entered on April 10, 1990 and substituting the following therefor: "Defendant Halsey Drug Co., Inc. manufactures generic prednisone tablets for sale to doctors and pharmacies. The active ingredi*164ent in said tablets, the drug prednisone, is manufactured by other parties and supplied to Halsey. Halsey merely puts the prednisone in tablet form. Plaintiff alleges that the prednisone tablets he ingested were manufactured by Halsey and he asserted three causes of action against Halsey sounding in products liability. Halsey then impleaded Zenith Laboratories, as a supplier of the drug prednisone allegedly ingested by plaintiff.” Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 12.1

                     PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 FOR THE THREE MONTHS                       FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                    ENDED MARCH 31,                             DECEMBER 31,
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   2007         2006        2006        2005        2004        2003        2002
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             (MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
<S>                                              <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations        $   231      $   143     $   448     $   583     $   592     $   376     $   320
Fixed Charges                                         81           85         346         342         362         390         408
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings                                         $   312      $   228     $   794     $   925     $   954     $   766     $   728
                                                 ================================================================================

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B)

Interest Expense                                 $    81      $    85     $   346     $   342     $   362     $   390     $   406
Interest Factor in Rentals                             -            -           -           -           -           -           2
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges                              $    81      $    85     $   346     $   342     $   362     $   390     $   408
                                                 ================================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                  3.85         2.68        2.29        2.70        2.64        1.96        1.78
                                                 ================================================================================
</TABLE>

(A)   The term "earnings" shall be defined as pretax income from continuing
      operations. Add to pretax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to
      exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.

(B)   Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
      amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
      interest implicit in rentals.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-110-01-PB

Joshua Meier

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the September 7, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

negotiate a plea agreement or otherwise prepare for trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

additional time to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare

for trial, the court will continue the trial from September 7,

2005 to November 1, 2005. In agreeing to continue the trial, the

court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the

above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00110-SM Document 8 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 31, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until October 18, 2005 at 4:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 31, 2005

cc: Lincoln Soldati, Esq.

Donald Feith, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00110-SM Document 8 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
Encarnacion v. USA Doc. 7

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anders Raaum, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Federal Life Group, Inc. (the “registrant”); and

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |   |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

Date: April 30, 2019

| /s/ Anders Raaum                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Anders Raaum                                      |
| Chief Financial Officer, Federal Life Group, Inc. |
Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc. Severance Program



 Exhibit 10.21 
  
 The following resolution of the Board of Directors constitutes the Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc. Severance Program:

  
 RESOLVED, that the Board hereby approves the
severance program (the “Severance Program”) for the Corporation as follows: In the event of involuntary termination or severance of a full-time employee with the Corporation for any reason by the Corporation, other than good cause based on
such employee’s performance, the Corporation shall pay to such employee or employees, as the case may be: 
  

	 	•	 	Band 1 and Band 2 (Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Vice President)—12- months Pay (“Pay” shall mean base salary, target bonus plus payment in lieu of
medical insurance for the period of severance) 

  

	 	•	 	Band 3 (Director)—6-months Pay 

  

	 	•	 	Band 4 (Manager) and Band 5 (support personnel)—3 months Pay 

  
 However, to the extent an employee has a written agreement from the Corporation relating to severance, such employee shall be entitled to
the greater of (1) the severance provided under the Severance Program or (2) the severance provided under such employee’s written agreement; however, in no event shall such employee be entitled to receive severance under both the Severance
Program and its written agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement that the Severance Program only applies to full-time employees, the Severance Program shall also apply to Janice Peterson.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The Honorable Frederic Block, Senior United States District Judge for **

the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARMINDER SINGH CHAWLA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-77231

Agency No. A095-560-443

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 5, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, District

Judge.** 

Parminder Singh Chawla petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his applications for asylum and withholding

of removal. We assume familiarity with the facts, prior proceedings, and issues

FILED

MAY 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

presented. Because the BIA overruled the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) adverse

credibility finding but otherwise affirmed the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s

decision, as modified by the BIA, as the final agency decision. Gonzalez v. INS, 82

F.3d 903, 907 (9th Cir. 1996).

The IJ’s finding that Chawla was not targeted on account of a protected

ground is not supported by substantial evidence. To the contrary, the testimony of

Chawla and his father before the IJ, deemed credible by the BIA, compels the

conclusion that the harm Chawla suffered was “at least in part” on account of an

imputed political opinion because of the ethnic slurs. Sinha v. Holder, 564 F.3d

1015, 1021-23 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The fact that the attackers were also evidently

motivated by a desire to steal petitioners’ money and valuables does not undercut

the role that racial animus played in their motivation. Persecutors can have

multiple motives.”).

In finding that Chawla had not suffered past persecution, the IJ considered

only the beating Chawla suffered on June 7, 2003. Although the record in this case

does not compel a finding of past persecution, the IJ committed legal error in

failing to consider the cumulative effect of the additional harassment, threats, and

extortion suffered by Chawla and his family. See Krotova v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d

1080, 1084 (9th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, this case must be remanded for
3

reconsideration under the correct standard. Ornelas-Chavez v. Gonzales, 458 F.3d

1052, 1058 (9th Cir. 2006).

This case is remanded for the BIA to determine whether Chawla has

demonstrated eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal.

The petition for review is 

GRANTED and the case is REMANDED to the BIA.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50225

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PABLO ARIAS PUIG,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-94-CR-178

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pablo Arias Puig pleaded guilty to attempted escape and

tampering with a witness. Puig's plea agreement contained a

waiver of the right of appeal. The agreement stated that Puig

was aware that the sentence would be imposed in conformity with

the guidelines. Puig now seeks review of the district court's

sentence. The Government argues that Puig waived the right to

appeal.
No. 95-50225

-2-

Our review of the record shows that Puig knowingly and

voluntarily waived his right to appeal the sentence imposed by

the district court. United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 568

(5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 293 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 244 (1994). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.