alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HOWARD v. GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO. et al.

No. 3025.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1948.

For former opinion see 36 So.2d 881.

Leslie A. Fitch and Durrett & Hardin, all of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Fuller and Roland C. Kizer, City Atty., all of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

On Application for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM,

Defendants, the City of Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge Water Works Company and the latter defendant’s insurer, apply for a rehearing in this case.

In its application, the defendant City of Baton Rouge contends that we erred in not finding plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence and in holding plaintiff free of contributory negligence. After a thorough reexamination of the record, we are of the firm opinion that our holding is correct. Its application for rehearing is denied.

In its application, the defendants, the Water Works Company and its insurer contend that we erred (1) in holding the Baton Rouge Water Works Company guilty of negligence, (2) in holding that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence, (3) in awarding an excessive amount in damages, and (4) in not recognizing the liability of the defendants inter se.

We find no merits in the first three contentions of defendants. As to the fourth contention, the defendants set forth that the City of Baton Rouge may contend that it is liable only for a third of the judgment wherein the defendant insurer is liable only for the liability of the Water Works Company, thus making the City of Baton Rouge liable for one-half of the judgment. In order to clarify our former decree, we amend our decree so as to set the liability amongst the defendants themselves, without in any manner relieving the said defendants from liability in solido to the plaintiff, in the proportion of one-half to each, that is, the City of Baton Rouge and Baton Rouge Water Works Company. As thus amended our decree stands final and the application of these defendants is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 53 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 53

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
requiring a two-thirds vote to pass legislation that would result in a 
   deficit in the budget of the United States for any fiscal period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2001

  Mr. Tanner (for himself, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Moore, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. 
  Carson of Oklahoma, Mr. Lucas of Kentucky, Mr. Baca, Mr. Hill, Mr. 
 Matheson, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. John, Mr. Turner, Mr. Shows, 
Mr. Schiff, and Mr. Sandlin) introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
requiring a two-thirds vote to pass legislation that would result in a 
   deficit in the budget of the United States for any fiscal period.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Any bill, resolution, or other legislative measure the 
enactment of which would result in a deficit in the budget of the 
United States for any fiscal period shall require for final adoption in 
each House the concurrence of two-thirds of the Members of that House 
voting and present. On any vote for which the concurrence of two-thirds 
is required under this article, the yeas and nays of the Members of 
either House shall be entered on the Journal of that House.
    ``Section 2. The Congress may waive the requirements of this 
article when a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also 
waive this article when the United States is engaged in military 
conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat to national 
security and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a 
majority of the whole number of each House, which becomes law. Any such 
waiver shall be effective for not longer than two years.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# Date & Time:

Thursday, September 18, 2008, 9 a.m.-4 p.m.

# Place:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

# Agenda:

Commissioners will hold a workshop discussion on Preparing for Election Day 2008 and Empowering Voters. Commissioners will consider and vote on whether to modify Advisory Opinion 07-003-A regarding Maintenance of Effort (MOE) funding, pursuant to HAVA, section 254(a)(7). Commissioners will consider and vote on a Proposed Replacement Advisory Opinion 07-003-B Regarding Maintenance of Effort. Commissioners will consider a Draft Policy for Notice and Public Comment; Commissioners will consider a Draft Policy for Joint Partnership Task Force of EAC and State Election Officials Regarding Spending of HAVA Funds; Commissioners will consider Proposed Administrative Regulations and receive an Update on Final Administrative Regulations. Commissioners will consider and vote on the Adoption of the Alternative Voting Methods Study. Commissioners will receive a briefing regarding the Best Practices to Ensure Voting Systems Perform Accurately and Securely on Election Day. Commissioners will receive an Update on the 2008 Requirements payments to States. Commissioners will consider comments received on the Draft EAC Guidance to States Regarding Updates to State Plans. The Commission will consider other administrative matters.

This meeting will be open to the public.

      ( print page 51634)    

# Person to Contact for Information:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Election Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. E8-20606 Filed 9-2-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-1942V

Filed: October 19, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

DERHYL MIDDLETON,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On December 14, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) caused by the influenza vaccine she received on September 

27, 2016. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 5. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual 

effects of her injury for more than six months and that neither she nor any other party 

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
has received compensation for her injury, alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 5-6. The 

case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 15, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent “concluded that petitioner suffered a Table injury of 

SIRVA.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as it now 

stands, compensation is appropriate, as petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites 

for compensation under the Act.” Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                         426,164
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  223,142
[ALLOWANCES]                                     4,000
[INVENTORY]                                     35,153
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               805,727
[PP&E]                                      15,500,825
[DEPRECIATION]                              13,843,240
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               2,463,312
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          267,030
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                     1,071,610
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 2,463,312
[SALES]                                        455,058
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               481,630
[CGS]                                          276,458
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  394,419
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                   874
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               1,309
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 85,028
[INCOME-TAX]                                       225
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             84,803
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    84,803
[EPS-BASIC]                                       0.03
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     0.03
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52407-52408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3291-EM]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Mississippi (FEMA-3291-EM), dated August 30, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 2, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas for which the President declared an emergency 
on August 30, 2008:

    Jackson, Hancock, and Harrison Counties for debris removal 
(Category A) under the

[[Page 52408]]

Public Assistance program (already designated for emergency 
protective measures (Category B), including direct Federal 
assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-20814 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,325
<SECURITIES>                                       255
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                       608
<INVENTORY>                                      4,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,568
<PP&E>                                          36,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,627
<BONDS>                                         28,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,878
<COMMON>                                         3,262
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,498
<SALES>                                         71,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,249
<CGS>                                           56,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                       913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 123 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 123

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2002

 Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-229 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 22, 2002''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement  of Financial Condition  for Princeton Mining Company at September 30,
1999  (unaudited)  and the Statement of Income  for the nine month period  ended
September 30,  1999 (unaudited) and is qualified  in  its entirety by  reference
to  such financial  statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              85
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    85
<PP&E>                                          25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       956,334
<OTHER-SE>                                    (961,002)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    (4,668)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,671)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)








</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the best
of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of PSEG Power LLC.


                                   /s/ E. James Ferland
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   E. James Ferland
                                   PSEG Power LLC
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   July 30, 2004
#### The State, ex rel. Wolfe, *v.*Richards et al., Judges.

(No. 24192

Decided June 21, 1933.)

*Mr. Benjamin F. James*and *Mr. Silas E. Burin,*for relator.

*Messrs. Tracy, Chapman é Welles*and *Mr. Fred E. Fuller,*for respondents.

The court find that the demurrer is well taken and is therefore sustained and the petition in mandamus.is dismissed for the following reasons: Under Section 6, Article IV of the state Constitution, the authority to find and determine whether a judgment upon which the judges of a Court of Appeals had agreed is in conflict with a judgment pronounced upon the same question by another Court of Appeals is vested exclusively in the judges of the Court of Appeals who have agreed upon such conflicting judgment. The question whether or not such conflict exists is not open to review by this court. If the judges of the Court of Appeals find such *64conflict of judgment to exist and certify the cause to this court as authorized by the Constitution, the case is then in this court for review and final determination. If the Court of Appeals does not find such conflict to exist and hence refuses to certify the case to this court its finding and action is in that respect final. *The State, ex rel. The Sylvania Home Telephone Co.,*v. *Richards et al., Judges,*94 Ohio St., 287; *Flury*v. *Central Publishing House of Reformed Church in the United States,*118 Ohio St., 154. It is further ordered that the petition in mandamus be dismissed.

*Petition dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Allen, Stephenson, Bevts, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.