alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007                       /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          2,650
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0 
<PP&E>                                      2,785,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                156,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,920,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                     1,015,282
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   232,230
<COMMON>                                       95,090
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,231,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,920,071
<SALES>                                       180,105 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              193,787
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  95,548 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             31,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                63,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            63,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   63,362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.68
        

</TABLE>
#### The State, ex rel. Nicholl, a Taxpayer, *v.*Miller, Village Clerk.

(No. 24094

Decided June 15, 1933.)

*Mr. William A. Miller, Mr. G. A. Resek*and *Mr. H. jH. Hoppe,*for relator.

*Mr. J. J. Smythe,*village solicitor, and *Messrs. Andrews, Hadden <fb Burton,*for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer to the reply, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that such demurrer be sustained for the reason that while the ordinance in question provides for an addition to an existing public utility and not for the acquisition or construction of a public utility, and hence is subject to referendum, not under the Constitution of Ohio, Article XVIII, Section 5, but under Section 4227-1 *et seq.,*General Code, the petition does not contain a sufficient number of signatures to require the respondent to certify the same to the board of elections. *State, ex rel. Kahle,*v. *Rupert, Aud.,*99 Ohio St., 17.

Relator not desiring to plead further, the writ of mandamus is denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Allen, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur

Bevis, J., not participating.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40019

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Juventino Castro, Jr.

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:17-CR-673-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Juventino Castro, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of his motion 

for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). On appeal, 

he argues that the district court abused its discretion because it found that 

Castro’s fear of COVID-19 reinfection, in light of his prior recovery from 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 16, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40019 Document: 00516094994 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/16/2021
No. 21-40019

2

COVID-19, was not an extraordinary and compelling ground for 

compassionate release under § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). 

We review a district court’s decision to deny a prisoner’s 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. 

See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). A district 

court may modify a defendant’s term of imprisonment, after considering the 

applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, if the court finds that “extraordinary 

and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction.” § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

Here, the district court denied Castro’s motion based on an 

independent assessment of the § 3553(a) factors, and we affirm on that basis. 

See United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir. 2021); Chambliss, 

948 F.3d at 693–94. Accordingly, we need not consider the district court’s 

separate reasoning that Castro’s prior recovery from COVID-19 weighed 

against his release.

The district court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 21-40019 Document: 00516094994 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/16/2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAHSAAN JAMAR WATKINS, a/k/a Robert Leon Alexander,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief

District Judge. (2:99-cr-00189-2)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rahsaan Jamar Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Kasey Warner, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rahsaan Jamar Watkins appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to

suppress. He also challenges the denial of his second motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Watkins, No. 2:99-cr-00189-2

(S.D.W. Va. July 5 & Oct. 25, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1032

To prohibit oil and gas drilling in the Great Lakes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2001

Mr. STUPAK (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. BARRETT, Ms. KILPATRICK, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. KIND, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. CONYERS, Mr.

KUCINICH, Mr. OBEY, Mr. LUTHER, Mr. QUINN, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. BARCIA, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. MARKEY, and Mrs.

THURMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To prohibit oil and gas drilling in the Great Lakes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 After the enactment of this Act no person may com5 mence any drilling activity (including any slant or direc6 tional drilling) to extract oil or gas from lands beneath

7 waters under the jurisdiction of the United States in any

8 of the Great Lakes. The Attorney General of the United

9 States may bring an action in the appropriate United

10 States district court to enforce the prohibition contained
2

•HR 1032 IH

1 in this section. As used in this Act, the term ‘‘Great

2 Lakes’’ has the same meaning as provided by section 2

3 of the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 931;

4 70 Stat. 242).

Æ
Case 1:04-cv-00298-PB Document 3 Filed 08/31/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00298-PB Document 3 Filed 08/31/04 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10Q of PVC Container Corporation ("PVCC") for the
period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip L. Friedman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of PVC Container Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PVCC.

/s/ Phillip L. Friedman

Name:    Phillip L. Friedman
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:    May 15, 2003

                                                                              20
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                 --------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report:              April 17, 1998
(Date of earliest event reported)


                       CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                             (Packager and Servicer)
    (Issuer in Respect of the REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1998-2)
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 Delaware                     333-43167                 13-3408713
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other juris-       (Commission                 (I.R.S. Employer
diction of organization)      File Nos.)                 Identification No.)


909 Third Avenue, New York, New York            10043
------------------------------------            -----
(Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip Code)


Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code (212) 559-3435

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)


<PAGE>

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits

                   (c) Exhibits



Item 601 (a)
of Regulation S-K
Exhibit No.                        Description
----------                         -----------

(EX-23)             Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent
                    Certified Public Accountants of MBIA Insurance
                    Corporation in connection with Citicorp Mortgage
                    Securities, Inc., REMIC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
                    Series 1998-2


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                              (Registrant)


                               By:/s/John H. Outland
                                  ------------------
                                  John H. Outland
                                  Senior Vice President


Dated: April 17, 1998


<PAGE>

                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS


                                                           Paper (P) or
Exhibit No.               Description                      Electronic (E)
-----------               -----------                      --------------

(EX-23)            Consent of Coopers & Lybrand                 E
                   L.L.P., independent Certified Public
                   Accountants of MBIA Insurance Corp-
                   oration in connection with Citicorp
                   Mortgage Securities, Inc., REMIC Mortgage
                   Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1998-2
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1022

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 12, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend title 4, United States Code, to make sure the

rules of etiquette for flying the flag of the United States

do not preclude the flying of flags at half mast when

ordered by city and local officials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1022 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Recogni3 tion Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. FLAG CODE AMENDMENT.

5 Section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amend6 ed by inserting after the sentence beginning ‘‘In the event

7 of the death of a present or former official of the govern8 ment of any State’’ the following: ‘‘In the event of the

9 death of a present or former official of any city or other

10 locality, the chief elected official of that locality may pro11 claim that the National flag shall be flown at half staff.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 12,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Eric M. Markell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.











Date:  November 2, 2010/s/Eric M. MarkellEric M. MarkellExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549





FORM 25





NOTIFICATION OF REMOVAL FROM LISTING AND/OR


REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.





Commission File Number  001-11001


Issuer:  Frontier Communications Corporation
 Exchange:  New York Stock Exchange
  (Exact name of Issuer as specified in its charter, and name of Exchange where security is listed and/or registered)





3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut  06905


(203) 614-5600
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Issuer’s principal executive offices)





Common Stock, par value $0.25 per share
 --------------------------------------------


(Description of class of securities)







Please place an X in the box to designate the rule provision relied upon to strike the class of securities from listing and registration:





o           17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(1)




o           17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(2)




o           17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(3)




o           17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(4)




o
Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(b), the Exchange has complied with its rules to strike the class of securities from listing and/or withdraw registration on the Exchange.1




x
Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(c), the Issuer has complied with the rules of the Exchange and the requirements of 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(c) governing the voluntary withdrawal of the class of securities from listing and registration on the Exchange.





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,Frontier Communications Corporation (Name of Issuer or Exchange) certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing the Form 25 and has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.








December 15,
2011By:/s/ David R.
WhitehouseSenior Vice President and Treasurer


DateNameTitle





1Form 25 and attached Notice will be considered compliance with the provisions of 17 CFR 240.19d-1 as applicable. See General Instructions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Duane Taylor, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting *903him of attempted murder in the first degree and attempted assault in the first degree with respect to a police officer, and kidnapping in the first degree and reckless endangerment in the second degree with respect to an insurance saleswoman, stemming from an incident at the Greater Buffalo International Airport. He took the woman hostage and demanded an airplane to take him to Japan. After the woman escaped from him, defendant, while holding a pointed steak knife with a five-inch serrated blade, ran at the police officer. When defendant, with the knife raised, was within three or four feet of the officer, the officer shot him twice in the leg, stopping his advance. Defendant contends on appeal that the proof of intent of attempted murder and attempted assault was legally insufficient. Intent may be inferred from defendant’s conduct and the surrounding circumstances *(see, People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296, 302, *rearg denied*41 NY2d 1010) and actual injury is not required *(see, People v Austin,*106 AD2d 859). We find the proof of intent legally sufficient *(see, People v Ciola,*136 AD2d 557, *lv denied*71 NY2d 893; *People v Austin, supra).*

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.—attempted murder, first degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.