alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with PVC Container Corporation (the "Company") Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.

Date:  February 23, 2004
                                          s/Phillip L. Friedman
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Name: Phillip L. Friedman
                                          Title:  Chief Executive Officer


                                          s/Jeffrey Shapiro
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Name: Jeffrey Shapiro
                                          Title:  Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         (3,023)
<SECURITIES>                                 2,347,796
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (823)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,753,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,274
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           304
<OTHER-SE>                                     434,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,753,231
<SALES>                                         16,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,941
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,089
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,248
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,248
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7130

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LARRY ANTONIO SIMMONS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00653

- BHH

- 1 )

Submitted : December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Larry Antonio Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Antonio Simmons appeals the district court’s text order denying Simmons’ second motion for a sentence reduction under § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L.
No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. Upon review of the record, we find no reversible error in the court’s denial of relief. See United States v. Chambers , 956 F.3d 667, 671 (4th Cir. 2020) (explaining that we review de novo “the scope of a district court ’ s sentencing authority under the First Step Act”). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Simmons , No. 2:10

-

cr - 00653

- BHH

- 1 (D.S.C. June 8, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[LETTERHEAD OF SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.]



GMAC-RFC
2255 N. Ontario Street, Ste 400
Burbank, CA  91504
Attention: Compliance Officer


        Re: Annual Compliance Statement for RALI SERIES 2006-QS7 TRUST

        In connection  with the loans serviced by SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc. (the
"Company")  pursuant to the Company's Servicing  Agreement(s)/Purchase  and Sale
Agreement(s)  with  GMAC-RFC  and  any  applicable  Reconstitution  Agreement(s)
(together,  the "Transaction  Agreements"),  I, the undersigned officer,  hereby
certify the following as of December 31, 2006:

(i)  The Company  conducted a review of its  activities  during the  immediately
     preceding  calendar  year  (or  applicable  portion  thereof)  and  of  its
     performance  under the Transaction  Agreements  during such period has been
     made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations  under the  Transaction  Agreements in all
     material  respects  throughout  such calendar year (or  applicable  portion
     thereof),  except  that as of  January 1, 2006,  the  Company  did not have
     procedures for monitoring  compliance with requirements as specified in the
     applicable transaction agreements governing SEC Regulation AB transactions.
     To address the absence of such  procedures,  the Company's  management  has
     undertaken and completed the following  actions:  (a) completed a review of
     each  Transaction  Agreement and identified if there was specific  language
     affecting any of the Servicing  Criteria  outlined in Section 1122;  (b) to
     the degree that the Transaction  Agreements  required  specific  procedures
     related to the servicing  criteria,  the Company's  Reference Point Library
     (where all  policies and  procedures  are  maintained)  was updated to this
     effect;  (c)  for  each  pool,  a  Control  Matrix  was  completed  (and is
     maintained on a current basis)  identifying  which  Transaction  Agreements
     control each pool;  and (d)  established a monthly review process where the
     Company's  managers  review key factors of  performance  under  Transaction
     Agreements and respond to a questionnaire  indicating  compliance with such
     factors.



        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I do hereby  certify the  foregoing as of the date
hereof.

        /s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.

        John R. Purcell, Jr.
        Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

        Date:  February 27, 2007
Case 1:04-cv-00356-SM   Document 117   Filed 06/07/07   Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.




                                /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                May 5, 2005
#### In re James RAMEY, Debtor-Appellant. In re James Ramey Debtor. Lone Star Bank, Movant-Appellee, v. James M. Ramey and Ella Ramey, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 03-1267, 03-1315.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 16, 2003.

*ORDER*

On April 30, 2003, the court issued an order indicating that these appeals would be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit absent objection within 14 days. No objections having been received within the time allowed.

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

These appeals are hereby transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL W. BOND, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1808

)

LAUREN B. BOND, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; John S. Carlin, Judge.

Michael W. Bond, pro se. 

Linda H. Fried of Fried & Fried, P.A., Fort 

Myers, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand Capital
SBIC, L.P. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 4, 2005


                                        /s/ Allen F. Grum
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Allen F. Grum, President of
                                        Rand Capital Corporation
                                        (equivalent of chief executive officer
                                        of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)

Dated: November 4, 2005


                                        /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer of
                                        Rand Capital Corporation
                                        (equivalent of chief financial officer
                                        of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Vianney Robles

,

Appellant,

v.

Amy Nichols, Kubinski & Nichols, P.C.,

Andres E. Almanzan,Mounce, Green,

Myers, Safi, Paxson & Galatzan, P.C. aka

Mounce, Green , Myers, Safi,Paxson &

Galatzan, A Professional Corporation

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 2 25

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2019 DCV 1582 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s second mot ion for extension of time within which to

file the reply brief until February 11, 2020

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO F ILE THE APPELLANT’S REPLY BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS

COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Doris Sipes

, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the

Appellant’s reply brief and forward the same to this Co urt on or before February 11, 2020

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of January , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)


In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Mavenir Systems, Inc. (“Mavenir”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry Hungle, as Chief Financial Officer of Mavenir, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                             
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mavenir.

Dated: April 21, 2015





By/s/ Terry HungleTerry HungleChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by Mavenir for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Mavenir under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1 Filed 03/22/04 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1 Filed 03/22/04 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1 Filed 03/22/04 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00104-PB Document 1 Filed 03/22/04 Page 4 of 4
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1.3    
    


VITACUBE SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.  


February     ,
2005 


The
Shemano Group, Inc.

601 California Street, Suite 1150

San Francisco, CA 94108 


	Re:
	Lock-up
Extension Agreement 



Dear
Sirs: 


        The
undersigned is a holder of shares of common stock, and/or options, warrants, or other rights to acquire common stock, of VitaCube Systems Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") and has entered into a lock-up agreement covering VitaCube securities held by the undersigned, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A (the "Lock-up
Agreement"). Terms used in this agreement and not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Lock-up Agreement. 


        To
induce the Underwriter and any other underwriters that may participate in the Public Offering to continue their efforts in connection with the Public Offering, the undersigned hereby
agrees to amend the Lock-up Agreement to provide that the Lock-up Agreement will remain in full force following March 1, 2005, and will terminate in the event the Public
Offering does not close on or before May 1, 2005. Except as set forth in the foregoing sentence, the Lock-up Agreement remains in full force and effect. 



	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 (Signature)
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 (Print Name)
	

AGREED to and ACCEPTED this            day
of                        2005	
 	

 
	

THE SHEMANO GROUP, INC.	
 	

 
	

By	
 	

 Authorized Signature	
 	

 





        Please
return a copy of this Agreement to the Company by fax at (303)316-4116 and mail the original to the Company in the enclosed, postage paid envelope. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1.3
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00054- CV
Catlin R. Edw ards, Appellan t

v. Jessica C. Sayre , Appellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 04- 0029 76, H ONO RAB LE TEXANNA DAVIS, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant has filed a motion reque sting that this appea l be dismiss ed. We g rant the motion and dismi ss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Mar ch 20, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7002 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7002

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2022

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
            by blue and yellow lights in support of Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gateway Solidarity Act''.

SEC. 2. ILLUMINATION OF THE GATEWAY ARCH IN SUPPORT OF UKRAINE.

            To show support and solidarity with the Ukrainian people, 
        the Secretary of the Interior shall illuminate the Gateway Arch 
        in St. Louis, Missouri, by blue and yellow lights--
                    (A) in 2022, within 15 days following enactment of 
                this act, for no fewer than 5 consecutive days; and
                    (B) annually on August 24, in recognition of 
                Ukrainian Independence Day, until the President reports 
                to Congress that the government of the Russian 
                Federation has ceased its destabilizing activities with 
                respect to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of 
                Ukraine.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Robert C. Hodgkins Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report of DCP Holding Company (the “Company’) on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 12a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007     Signature: /s/ Robert C. Hodgkins, Jr.    Robert C. Hodgkins, Jr.    Principal Financial Officer  
66
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7045
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTONIO BULLOCK, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-250-A, CA-97-681-AM) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. John Thomas Martin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bullock , Nos. CR-88-250-A; CA-97-681-AM (E.D. Va. June 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED