alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               UT
<CIK>                                   0000081100
<NAME>                                  PUGET SOUND ENERGY
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      3,528,443
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    253,273
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         409,796
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 602,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,794,035
<COMMON>                                       845,605
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      450,837
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            47,650
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,344,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          65,662
<PREFERRED>                                    60,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,689,770
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             251,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 162,278
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  85,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,135,633
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  4,794,035
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      1,422,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           68,526
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,145,196
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,213,722
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        208,278
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             26,648
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 234,926
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       109,193
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,733
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    8,689
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  117,044
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       116,694
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      100,925
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         284,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.38


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                            46
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                   9150
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9196
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  9196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             20
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                        9145
<OTHER-SE>                        31
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    9196
<SALES>                          686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 686
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  61
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              625
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                     625
<EPS-BASIC>                    .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .41


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 2, and Friday, October 3, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) will be held Thursday, October 2, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and Friday, October 3, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., in Atlanta, GA. If you would like to have the Joint Committee of TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360, or write Patricia Robb, TAP Office, MS-1006-MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or FAX to (414) 231-2363, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. For information to join the Joint Committee meeting, contact Patricia Robb at the above number.                 

The agenda will include the following: Discussion of issues and responses brought to the Joint Committee, office report, and discussion of annual meeting. 

Dated: August 29, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-20942 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### DAVIS v. UNGERMAN.

No. 4604.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 3, 1933.

•J. S. Pickett, of Many, for appellant.

Edwin M. Fraser, of Many, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

This is a suit, coupled with a provisional seizure, to recover wages for work done in drilling an oil well. In the lower court plaintiff obtained judgment for $196, maintaining *402the provisional seizure and recognizing his privilege. The case was tried and judgment rendered January 17, 1933. Judgment was signed and filed the next day, and at the same time defendant was granted a suspensive and devolutive appeal to this court. Appeal bond was filed January 28, 1933.

The testimony taken at the trial was not reduced to writing. The only statement of facts found in the record is one made by the trial judge, dated and filed April 1, 1933, after the taking of the appeal and the filing of the bond.

Appellee files a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the testimony was not taken down in writing at the time of the trial, that the statement of facts by the district judge was not obtained and filed until after the appeal was taken and perfected, and that plaintiff did not consent to the making and filing of the statement of facts after the perfecting of the appeal.

 In an answer to the motion to dismiss, and an answer to that, it appears that some effort was made to obtain an agreed statement of facts by the parties, but it is not established that plaintiff or his counsel ever consented to the taking and filing of the statement found in the record. A statement made by one party and denied by the other does not constitute proof.

The proceedings in this case are governed by articles 602 and 603 of the Code of Practice. The former article applies to statements agreed to by the parties. The latter provides for the making of a statement by the court when the parties cannot agree. There is nothing in either article fixing the time when such statements must be filed, but there is a long unbroken line of decisio.ns holding that the certificate of the judge as to the facts, issued after- appeal had been obtained and perfected, does not meet the requirements of the law and cannot be considered without the consent of the parties. Scott v. Blanchard, 8 Mart. (N. S.) 303; LeBlanc v. Broussard’s Heirs, 16 La. 137; Hill v. Tippett, 10 La. Ann. 554; State ex rel. v. Judge of Second Dist. Court, 13 La. Ann. 485; Theus v. Kemp, 49 La. Ann. 1650, 22 So. 962; Cohn Flour & Feed Co. v. Mitchell, 18 La. App. 534, 136 So. 782.

Counsel for appellant asks that, in the event the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained, he be reserved the right to perfect a devolutive appeal herein. We are without right to change the legal effect of the judgment rendered on this motion.

Under the facts in this case and the settled, jurisprudence, appellee’s motion must be sustained.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed at the cost of appellant.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-15-00116-CR

Style: William Cormac Quinn

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: June 23, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to supplement the record

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: State’s Exhibit 1 and “Defense Proferred [sic] Exhibit”

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 No further extensions of time will be granted

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant moves the Court to order the Harris County District Clerk to transport

two exhibits to this Court for inclusion in the appellate record. The exhibits were

filed with the Clerk of this Court on June 30, 2015. Accordingly, we dismiss the

motion as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack



Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: July 14, 2015
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the report of Asia Time Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kwong Kai ShunKwong
                Kai Shun
              Chief
                Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
              andChairman
                of the Board
              (Principal
                Executive Officer; Principal
              Financialand
                Accounting Officer)


April
      17,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Asia Time Corporation and will be retained by Asia Time Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Ex Parte Luis Carlos Medrano, 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00016-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court, #1

of El Paso County, Texas

(Trial Court No. 20040D03900-34I-01)

O R D E R

On March 22, 2021, the trial court filed a certificate of Applicant Luis Carlos Medrano’s

right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2 indicating that this case “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” While the record shows that Applicant

entered a plea-bargain agreement for the underlying offense of possessing more than four but less 

than 200 grams of cocaine in violation of Texas Health & Safety Code § 481.115, the appeal here 

concerns the trial court’s December 10, 2020, denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus 

under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 11.072(8). As a result, after reviewing the record, this 

Court has determined that the certificate is defective. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 

(Tex.Crim.App. 2005); see also Ex Parte King, No. 03-18-00062-CR, 2018 WL 3849488, at **3-

4 (Tex.App.—Austin Aug. 14, 2018)(not designated for publication). Consequently, under Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.1 and 35.5, we order the trial court to issue a new certificate of 

Applicant’s right to appeal. See Ex Parte Tarango, 116 S.W.3d 201 (Tex.App.—El Paso 2003). 

The clerk’s record in this cause reflects Applicant filed an Application for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus on October 5, 2020. The trial court denied the relief sought on December 10, 2020. On 

January 8, 2021, the Applicant filed a notice of appeal for the denial of the Writ of Habeas Corpus. 
Accordingly, the certificate should reflect the appeal is taken from the denial of the Habeas Corpus. 

The trial court’s certification signed on March 22, 2021, states the case “is a plea-bargain case and 

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The underlying case Applicant was convicted in was a plea 

bargain in which he waived his right to appeal, however, the record shows Applicant is currently 

appealing the denial of a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with he trial court clerk within 15 days from 

the date of this order a corrected certification of the defendant’s right of appeal as required by 

TEX.R.APP.P. 25(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the corrected certification and file it with this Court no later than June 3, 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers

v. Civil No. 04-cv-397-JD

NH State Prison, Warden

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 11, 2005, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

June 8, 2005 _________________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Randolph Chambers, pro se

Laura Lombardi, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00397-JD Document 21 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130964 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130964 COA: 267742 Wayne CC: 79-929795-01 RONALD BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

s1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### Stephen Akin MOLAJOYE, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-1080.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2003.

Decided Aug. 12, 2003.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Immigration Law Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Earle B. Wilson, Senior Litigation, Leslie M. McKay, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Akin Molajoye, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Molajoye’s motion to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. *See In re: Molajoye,*No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Dec. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Case 1:05-cv-00178-JD   Document 66   Filed 04/04/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00178-JD   Document 66   Filed 04/04/06   Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.17.3

                             THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
                     INTEREST RATE SWAP GUARANTEE AGREEMENT

      This Third Amendment to the Interest Rate Swap Guarantee Agreement
("Second Amendment") is made effective as of July 1, 2004, by and among
Westcorp, a California corporation, Western Financial Bank, a federally
chartered bank ("WFB"), and WFS Receivables Corporation 2, a Nevada corporation
("WFSRC2"), and hereby amends the Interest Rate Swap Guarantee Agreement entered
into by the parties on May 10, 2001, as subsequently amended, with reference to
the following:

                                    RECITALS

      WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into the original agreement
on May 10, 2001; and

      WHEREAS, the agreement was subsequently amended on March 3, 2003 and
August 5, 2003 (the original agreement, first amendment and second amendment are
hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Agreement");

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend and restate Schedule A to the
Agreement in order to update the swap agreement list;

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set
forth herein, and in reliance upon the recitals set forth above, the Agreement
is amended as follows:

                                    AGREEMENT

   1.    Schedule A-1 to the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as
         Schedule A-2 and is attached hereto and is hereby incorporated and made
         part of the Agreement.

   2.    Except as specifically amended herein, all terms of the Agreement shall
         remain in full force and effect.

   3.    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth
         in the Agreement.

      WHEREFORE, the undersigned have executed this Third Amendment on the date
set forth below to be effective as of the date first set forth above.

<PAGE>

WESTCORP

___________________________

WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK

__________________________________

WFS RECEIVABLES CORPORATION 2, INC

__________________________________

<PAGE>

                                  SCHEDULE A-2

1.    Prepayment Differential Interest Rate Swap Agreements between Western
      Financial Bank and Citibank, N.A., dated as of May 9, 2001.

2.    Interest Rate Swap Agreements between Western Financial Bank and Merrill
      Lynch dated as of March 3, 2003.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.4.1

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                          MASTER TAX SHARING AGREEMENT

      This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER TAX SHARING AGREEMENT is entered into
as of June 10, 2004 ("Amendment"), by and among Westcorp (FEIN No. 53-0308535)
and each of the subsidiaries subscribed thereto.

                                    RECITALS

      WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Master Tax Sharing Agreement,
effective as of the first day of the consolidated return year beginning January
1, 2004 ("Agreement");

      WHEREAS, WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc., a Member of the Agreement, merged
into its parent company, WFS Financial Inc on March 19, 2004;

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to remove WFS Financial
Auto Loans, Inc. as a Member; and

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained in the Agreement and in this Addendum and for other good and
sufficient consideration, the Agreement is amended as follows:

      1.    WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc. (33-0149603) is removed as a Member
            to the Agreement effective March 19, 2004.

      Except as amended specifically herein, all terms and conditions of the
Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect.

      All capitalized terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning as
set forth in the Agreement.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on the
date set forth below to be retroactive to and effective as of March 19, 2004.

WESTCORP

By: ________________________________________          Date: _________, 2004
      Thomas A. Wolfe, President

WFS FINANCIAL INC

By:                                                   Date: _________, 2004
    ________________________________________
      Shelley Chase, Senior Vice President
      & Director of Tax
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 1, 2013



/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: August 1, 2013



/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)