alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-920-1310-08; TXNM 118213]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
TXNM 118213

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, 
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease TXNM 118213 from the lessee, 
Woodward Development LLC, for lands in Houston County, Texas. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico 
State Office, at (505) 438-7586.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued that affects 
the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16\2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 
administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost 
for publishing this Notice in the Federal Register. The lessee met all 
the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 
31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We 
are proposing to reinstate lease TXNM 118213, effective the date of 
termination, June 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: September 9, 2008.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.
[FR Doc. E8-21425 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
#### Jose Casanova TIJERINA, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45359.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 1972.

*245Gowdy & Hall by Billy Hall, Littlefield, for appellant.

Andy Shuval, Dist. Atty., Hereford, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from an order revoking probation.

On April 6, 1970, appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of driving while intoxicated, subsequent offense, and punishment was assessed at three years. The imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation. One of the terms and conditions of probation was that he commit no offense against the laws of this or any other state or of the United States.

On August 8, 1971, a motion to revoke probation was filed. On August 19, 1971, an amended motion was filed alleging that appellant violated the terms of his probation “by violating the laws of the State of Texas in that the defendant was driving while intoxicated on a public highway in Randall County, Texas, on or about August 1, 1971.”

A hearing was held on August 19, 1971, and upon completion of said hearing, the court found that appellant “did violate such terms of your probation in that you were in an intoxicated condition on or about August 1, 1971, in Randall County, Texas, and that you were driving an automobile upon a public highway in Randall County, Texas, on or about August 1, 1971, while intoxicated or under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and therefore, the Court finds that your probation should be revoked and it is so ordered.”

First, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking the probation, alleging that the evidence is insufficient.

Highway Patrolman Ronald E. Boyter testified that he observed the manner in which appellant was driving his automobile; after the car was stopped, he observed appellant’s walk, smelled his breath, heard him talk, and was in his presence approximately three minutes. He testified that in his opinion the appellant was intoxicated. Patrolman Boyter was shown to be qualified to testify and give his opinion as to the intoxication of a person. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient. See, e. g., Day v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 246.

Finally, appellant contends that the trial judge committed reversible error when he stated: “Suppose we just don’t hear it. I don’t believe it is needed. I sustain the objection.” The comments referred to were made by the court when appellant objected to testimony relating to a breathalyzer test. We overrule appellant’s contention that such was reversible error. There is no showing that the appellant was prevented from presenting any evi*246dence on his behalf. Further, no objection was made to the court’s remarks and the error, if any, was waived. See Lipscomb v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 417, and cases cited therein.

There being no abuse of discretion, the judgment is affirmed.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofOctober 1, 2018, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.,as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES,A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, asOperating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C47 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.             Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2018 throughDecember 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreementduring such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.             Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a briefing meeting and a planning meeting of the Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 11 a.m. on Monday, September, 22, 2008, in Room 1 C located in the Legislative Building, 210 Capitol Ave., in Hartford, Connecticut. The purpose of the briefing is to hear from local advocates on topical civil rights issues. After the briefing the Committee will plan future activities. 

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the comments must be received in the regional office by October 22, 2008. The address is Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th St., NW., Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or who desire additional information should contact Alfreda Greene, Secretary, at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to:                     *agreene@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meetings and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meetings. 

                    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                 

The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, September 3, 2008. 

Christopher Byrnes, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. E8-20744 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-95-PB

Cushaw Barnett

O R D E R

Cushaw Barnett has filed a motion seeking to void his

criminal conviction. He argues that the conviction is void

because the court that accepted his guilty plea lacked subject

matter jurisdiction.

Barnett cites 18 U.S.C. § 3238, which specifies the place

where offenses committed outside of the jurisdiction of the

United States may be tried. His argument appears to be that

because federal law provides for a federal district court trial

of offenses committed outside of the jurisdiction of any state, 

the court necessarily lacks jurisdiction over offenses committed

within the jurisdiction of any state. He then reasons that his

federal conviction is void because he committed his offense in

New Hampshire. 

Barnett’s argument fails for several reasons. First, the

statute Barnett cites is a venue provision. It does not purport

Case 1:05-cr-00095-SM Document 91 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 2
to deprive the federal court of jurisdiction over crimes

committed within a state’s jurisdictional boundaries. More

importantly, Barnett overlooks 28 U.S.C. § 3231, which gives

federal district courts exclusive jurisdiction over “all offenses

against the laws of the United States.” Finally, to the extent

that Barnett is challenging venue rather than subject matter

jurisdiction, he overlooks Fed. R. Crim. P. 18, which specifies

that “unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the

government must prosecute the offense in a district where the

offense was committed.” Taken together, these provisions clearly

give both subject matter jurisdiction and venue to the federal

district court where the offense was committed. Because Barnett

committed his offense in this district, the court had both

subject matter jurisdiction and venue to accept his guilty plea. 

Barnett’s motion to void judgment (Doc. No. 88) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 2, 2010

cc: Cushaw Barnett, pro se

Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Debra M. Walsh, Esq.

United States Marshal

United States Probation

2

Case 1:05-cr-00095-SM Document 91 Filed 04/02/10 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  July 15, 2010





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o     Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))





Item 8.01
Other Events




The information set forth in the press release issued by Frontier Communications Corporation on July 15, 2010, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, is incorporated herein by reference.




Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)           Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on July 15, 2010.












SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  July 16, 2010
By:/s/ Robert J. LarsonRobert J. LarsonSenior Vice President andChief Accounting Officer
Order entered July 17 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01640
- CR STEVE ACOSTA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. F13
- 55987
- M



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On April 22, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel; (3) counsel timely requested preparation of the record; (4) Belinda Baraka is the court reporter who recorded the proceedings; (5) Ms. Baraka’s explanation for the delay in filing the record is her workload; and (6) Ms. Baraka requested until August 1, 2014 to file the reporter’s record.
We ORDER Belinda Baraka, official court reporter of the 194th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record in this appeal by AUGUST 1, 2014 . Becau se the record is now four months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If the record is not filed by the datespecified, the Court will order that Belinda Baraka not sit as a court reporter until the record is

filed in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Belinda Baraka, official court reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LAN A MYERS JUSTICE
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1082

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to expand the number of acres

authorized for inclusion in the conservation reserve.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 2001

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. ALLEN,

Mr. BALDACCI, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr.

BOEHLERT, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr.

COSTELLO, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. DELAHUNT,

Mr. DINGELL, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. EVANS, Mr. FROST,

Mr. GANSKE, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HOLDEN,

Mr. ISAKSON, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. KOLBE,

Mr. LUTHER, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of

California, Mr. NEY, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PHELPS, Mr.

PICKERING, Mr. POMBO, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. STUPAK, Mr.

THOMPSON of California, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mrs.

THURMAN, Mr. CONDIT, and Mr. JOHN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to expand the

number of acres authorized for inclusion in the conservation reserve.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1082 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED MAXIMUM ENROLL2 MENT IN CONSERVATION RESERVE.

3 Section 1231(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985

4 (16 U.S.C. 3831(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘36,400,000

5 acres’’ and inserting ‘‘45,000,000 acres’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998         
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998           
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998          
<CASH>                                               2,699       
<SECURITIES>                                             0       
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18,623       
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0       
<INVENTORY>                                          8,154       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    31,364       
<PP&E>                                               4,344       
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      51,305       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,661       
<BONDS>                                                  0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0       
<PREFERRED>                                              0       
<COMMON>                                                93       
<OTHER-SE>                                          12,303       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        51,305       
<SALES>                                             45,160       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    45,160       
<CGS>                                               26,047       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       14,896       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,663       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,595       
<INCOME-TAX>                                           209       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,253       
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         76       
<CHANGES>                                                0       
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,329       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.14    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.13    
                                                                            
                                                          

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Knowles

v. Civil No. 05-cv-363-PB

NH Department of Corrections, et al.

O R D E R

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead, is

designated to review the request for injunctive relief submitted by Plaintiff William Knowles

and, if necessary, conduct any hearing that may be set.

In accordance with subparagraph (C), the Magistrate Judge shall file his proposed

findings and recommendations under subparagraph (B) with the Court, and a copy shall

forthwith be mailed to all parties.

SO ORDERED.

March 28 , 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: William J. Knowles, Pro se

Case 1:05-cv-00363-JL Document 9 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0001022916
<NAME> KEYSPAN ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,398,263
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    572,669
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         484,142
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       180,438
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,635,512
<COMMON>                                        17,081
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      571,093
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            495,367
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,083,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           782,131
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       31,979
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 737,861
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,635,512
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      988,004
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            70,218
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     767,587
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     837,805
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        150,199
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               9,187
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 159,386
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        22,493
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,893
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  136,893
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        38,395
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       18,266
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         115,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.68
        

</TABLE>