alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0129]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Food Canning Establishment Registration, Process Filing, and Recordkeeping for Acidified Foods and Thermally Processed Low-Acid Foods in Hermetically Sealed Containers” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 3, 2008 (73 FR 31694), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0037. The approval expires on August 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: September 8, 2008.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E8-21353 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofJuly 1, 2018, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., asDepositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor and as Asset Representations Reviewer with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C45 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.             Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from July1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and 

 

2.             Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 05-cr-250-01-SM

Amy Halle

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 9) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2006 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver of

Speedy Trial Rights not later than January 6, 2006. On the filing of such waiver, her

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the

exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:05-cr-00250-SM Document 10 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: March 20, 2006 at 4:00 PM 

Jury Selection: April 4, 2006 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

December 28, 2005 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: William Morse, Esq.

 Sandra Bloomenthal, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00250-SM Document 10 Filed 12/28/05 Page 2 of 2
exv10w16



 





Exhibit 10.16




BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT




As of March 9, 2005, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the named
executive officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulations S-K) of CVB Financial Corporation:



	 	 	 	 	 
	D. Linn Wiley

President, Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	500,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Frank Basirico, Jr.

Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer
	 	$	235,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Edward J. Biebrich, Jr.

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	235,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Jay W. Coleman

Executive Vice President, Sales and Service Division
	 	$	 235,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Edwin J. Pomplun

Executive Vice President, Wealth Management Group
	 	$	162,000	 






Each of the named executive officers will be eligible to receive a discretionary bonus for 2005
pursuant to the Citizens Business Bank (“CBB”) Discretionary Performance Compensation Plan upon
adoption of such plan by CBB.



In addition, each of the named executive officers receives the right to use a bank owned
automobile. CBB also pays the country club dues for Messrs. Wiley and Coleman.



Like all employees of CBB, each of the named executive officers is also eligible to receive an
allocation pursuant to CBB’s 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 04-210-01-PB

 

Nancy Teresa Nunez-Morel

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

September 7, 2005 trial in the above case citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery issues and engage in plea

negotiations. Additionally, defendant’s baby is also due to be

born in December, 2005. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date. 

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from September 7, 2005 to February 7, 2006. 

In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:04-cr-00210-PB Document 23 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The August 22, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 19, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 22, 2005

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Mark Zuckerman, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:04-cr-00210-PB Document 23 Filed 08/22/05 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-51320.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 11, 2003.

Before WIENER, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*350PER CURIAM.*

Defendant-Appellant Kevin Williams was convicted on a charge of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was subsequently sentenced to serve 151 months imprisonment to be followed by five years supervised release; and he was also ordered to pay a special assessment. On appeal, Williams contests the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conspiracy conviction, and contends that the district court wrongfully enhanced his sentence for obstruction of justice under § 3C1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines and wrongfully denied a reduction under the “safety valve” provision of Guideline § 5C1.2.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal as well as the facts and applicable law advanced by the parties in their respective appellate briefs and their arguments before this panel. As a result, we are convinced that the evidence presented to the jury was more than sufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on the conspiracy charge; and we are equally convinced that the sentencing court committed no reversible error in enhancing Williams’s sentence for obstruction of justice and in denying him a 2-level reduction under the safety valve provision of the Guidelines. Williams’s conviction and sentence are, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James Libert, On Behalf Of Himself

And All Others Similarly Situated

v. Civil No. 05-cv-177-JM

Mark W. Blodgett, Lawrence W. Blodgett

and StockerYale, Inc.

Graziella Peano, Individually And On

Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated

v. Civil No. 05-cv-195-JD

Mark W. Blodgett, Lawrence W. Blodgett

and StockerYale, Inc.

Nickalus T. Holt, Individually And On

Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated

v. Civil No. 05-cv-202-SM

Mark W. Blodgett, Lawrence W. Blodgett

and StockerYale, Inc.

O R D E R

 I. In each of these cases a motion for consolidation, for

appointment of lead plaintiff and approval of plaintiffs’ co-lead

counsel and liaison counsel was filed by the Hilderhoff Group. 

Each of these motions was subsequently withdrawn as to the

request for appointment as lead plaintiff and lead counsel. The

Case 1:05-cv-00202-SM Document 14 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 3
2

dockets will be marked as follows: 

Document Docket # Entry

No. 6 05-cv-177-JM withdrawn request as to

lead plaintiff and lead

counsel

No. 5 05-cv-195-JD withdrawn request as to

lead plaintiff and lead

counsel

No. 6 05-cv-202-SM withdrawn request as to

lead plaintiff and lead

counsel

II. Both the Siregar Group and the Hilderhoff Group have

moved to consolidate the three cases. Defendants do not object

to consolidation. By separate order I have consolidated the

cases. Under the court’s assignment policy consolidated cases

are assigned to that judge presiding over the lowest numbered

case. In this instance they are assigned to me, that is, the

cases are consolidated into No. 05-cv-177-JM. Since I cannot

preside over the case without the consent of the parties, a

consent form is attached and counsel are ordered to notify the

clerk within twenty (20) days whether the parties consent or do 

Case 1:05-cv-00202-SM Document 14 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 3
3

not consent to my jurisdiction. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 21, 2005

cc: Douglas C. Doskocil, Esq.

 Jennifer A. Eber, Esq.

 Christine Friedman, Esq.

 Mark L. Mallory, Esq.

 William L. Chapman, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00202-SM Document 14 Filed 09/21/05 Page 3 of 3
#### The First National Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio, Trustee, et al. *v.*The Stacey Manufacturing Co. et al.

(No. 24459

Decided December 13, 1933.)

*Mr. William B. Collins*and *Messrs. Peck, Shaffer & Williams,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Paxton & Seasongood, Mr. August A. Ben-digs, Jr.,*and *Messrs. Peck, Shaffer S Williams,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and ádjudged that said petition in error he, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Starr

v. Case No. 05-cv-264-PB

Dube, et al. 

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from presiding over this case and direct the Clerk to reassign the

case to another judge. 

SO ORDERED.

April 24, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:05-cv-00264-SM Document 21 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6096

DANIELE DEPAOLIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

C. B. KING, Lieutenant; HUGHES, Lieutenant; T. B. SMITH, Sergeant; B. K. 

MCCRAY, Sergeant; D. J. DAVIS, Officer; M. S. BYINGTON, Officer; T. W. 

HALL, Officer; J. R. LEDFORD, Officer; JOHN SHORT, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00409-EKD-RSB)

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniele Depaolis, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniele Depaolis seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion for 

preliminary injunctive relief; denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial 

of preliminary injunctive relief; and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We 

affirm in part and dismiss in part.

Although the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction is an appealable 

interlocutory order, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(A)(1) (2012), we conclude that the district court did 

not abuse its discretion in determining that Depaolis’ transfer to another prison rendered 

his claim for injunctive relief moot. See Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Co., 649 F.3d 

287, 290 (4th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review). We therefore affirm the district 

court’s orders denying Depaolis’ motion for preliminary injunctive relief and denying his 

motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated by the district court. Depaolis v. King,

No. 7:16-cv-00409-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2016 & Jan. 31, 2017).

With respect to the order denying Depaolis’ motion for appointment of counsel, this 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S. Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). 

Because this order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, 

we dismiss this portion of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART

DISMISSED IN PART
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


August 13, 2019


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 1959


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1959 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-231484 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
Exhibit
21
 Subsidiaries of ORBCOMM Inc.
 Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of Organization
    
    % OwnedORBCOMM LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM License Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Canada Inc.
    
    New Brunswick,Canada
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Curacao Gateway N.V.
    
    Curacao
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM International Holdings LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM New Zealand Limited
    
    New Zealand
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM de Honduras, S.A.
    
    Honduras
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Guatemala S.A.
    
    Guatemala
    
    
    100
    %Bonimix S.A.
    
    Uruguay
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM de Nicaragua S.A.
    
    Nicaragua
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM de El Salvador S.A.
    
    El Salvador
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Peru S.A.
    
    Peru
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM AFRICA (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)
    
    South Africa
    
    
    100
    %Leosatellite Services de Ecuador S.A.
    
    Ecuador
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Panama Incorporated Inc.
    
    Panama
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Central America Holdings LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Australia Gateway Company Pty. Limited
    
    Australia
    
    
    100
    %Stellar Satellite Communications Ltd.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM LIS LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM China LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM South AFRICA Gateway Company LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM Terrestrial LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM International Holdings 1 LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM International Holdings 2 LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM International Holdings 3 LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Satcom International Group PLC
    
    England and Wales
    
    
    52.13
    %ORBCOMM Europe LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    50
    %ORBCOMM
Adriatic
    
    Croatia
    
    
    100
    %OE License
Company Ltd
    
    Ireland
    
    
    100
    %SAI ORBCOMM
Latvia
    
    Latvia
    
    
    100
    %MITE Global Communications S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    35
    %ORBCOMM Maghreb
    
    Morocco
    
    
    22.96
    %European Datacomm Holding NV
    
    Belgium
    
    
    1.82
    %ORBCOMM Japan
Ltd
    
    Japan
    
    
    51
    %ORBCOMM Africa LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM India LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %ORBCOMM AIS LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %
[Cite as State ex rel. N. Ohio Chapter of Associated Builders & Contrs., Inc. v. Barberton City 

School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 128 Ohio St.3d 539, 2011-Ohio-2252.] 

THE STATE EX REL. NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER OF ASSOCIATED BUILDERS &

CONTRACTORS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BARBERTON CITY SCHOOL 

DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL., APPELLEES. 

[Cite as State ex rel. N. Ohio Chapter of Associated Builders & Contrs., Inc. v. 

Barberton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 128 Ohio St.3d 539, 2011-Ohio-2252.] 

Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted.

(No. 2010-0943 — Submitted April 19, 2011 — Decided May 17, 2011.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 24898, 

188 Ohio App.3d 395, 2010-Ohio-1826. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently 

accepted. 

 O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Ross, Brittain & Schonberg Co., L.P.A., Alan G. Ross, and Nick A. 

Nykulak, for appellants. 

 McGown & Markling Co., L.P.A., Tamzin Kelley O’Neil, and Patrick 

Vrobel, for appellee Barberton City School District Board of Education. 

Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Solicitor 

General, Laura Eddleman Heim, Deputy Solicitor, and William C. Becker, Jon C. 

Walden, and James E. Rook, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Ohio 

School Facilities Commission. 

Pepple & Waggoner, Ltd., Christian M. Williams, Glenn D. Waggoner, 

and Mark J. Jackson, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio School Boards 

Association. 

______________________
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Eapen Chacko, Chief Financial
Officer of Possis Medical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Possis
     Medical, Inc.




December 12, 2003                                      /s/
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Eapen Chacko
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       Vice President of Finance


                                       25