alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 7

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 6, 2001

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 90th birthday of Ronald Reagan.

Whereas February 6, 2001, is the 90th birthday of Ronald

Wilson Reagan;

Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan

have distinguished records of public service to the United
2

HJ 7 RDS

States, the American people, and the international community;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming

margins as President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore

‘‘the great, confident roar of American progress, growth,

and optimism’’ and ensure renewed economic prosperity;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s leadership was instrumental in extending freedom and democracy around the globe and

uniting a world divided by the Cold War;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of

Americans, and by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s eloquence united Americans in

times of triumph and tragedy;

Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First

Lady but also led a national crusade against illegal drug

use;

Whereas together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their

lives to promoting national pride and to bettering the

quality of life in the United States and throughout the

world; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the

country are with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle

with Alzheimer’s disease: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress, on behalf of the American people, ex-
3

HJ 7 RDS

1 tends its birthday greetings and best wishes to Ronald

2 Reagan on his 90th birthday.

Passed the House of Representatives February 6,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Case 1:04-cv-00471-SM Document 1 Filed 12/13/04 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:04-cv-00471-SM Document 1 Filed 12/13/04 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:04-cv-00471-SM Document 1 Filed 12/13/04 Page 3 of 3
Order entered December 23, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01456 - CV SLOAN CREEK II, L.L. C., Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Co llin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006 - 3356 - 2008 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s December 20, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its brief. Appellant shall file it brief by January 19, 2015. We caution appellant that no further ext ension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 4961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
RANDALL G. SCOTT , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. ( 3:19

- cr - 00426

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : March 11, 2022 Decided: April 21, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded with instructions by un published per curiam opinion

.
Randall G. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STAT ES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Randall G. Scott pleaded guilty to a superseding information charging him with possession of firearms and ammunition as a pe rson who is an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(3), 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced Scott to 30 months’ imprisonment and two years of supervised release

. The court also ordered Scott to p ay a special assessment of $100. Scott appealed, and while the appeal was pending before this court , Scott died. For the reasons explained below, we dismiss Scott’s appeal as moot and remand to the district
court with instructions to vacate Scott’s conviction and sentence, including the special

assessment ; to refund any portion of the special assessment that has already been paid ; and

to dismiss the indictment and the superseding information

. We have recognized that an appellant’s “[d]eath pending ap peal of a criminal conviction abates not only the appeal but all proceedings in the prosecution from its inception. In such a case, the appeal is dismissed and the cause remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismis s the indictment.” United States v. Dudley , 739 F.2d 175, 176 (4th Cir. 1984) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Nelson v. Colorado , 137 S. Ct. 1249 (2017). An appellant’s death during the pendency of a crimin al appeal also requires an abatement of a special assessment and a refund of any already paid portion of a special assessment. See
United States v. Robertson , 980 F.3d 672, 674 (9th Cir. 2020); United States v. Brooks , 872 F.3d 78, 82 (2d Cir. 2017); Unit ed States v. Libous , 858 F.3d 64, 69 (2d Cir. 2017).3 Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot and remand to the district court with
instructions to vacate Scott’s conviction and sentence, including the special assessment ; to refund any portion of the special assessment that has already been paid ; and to dismiss the
indictment and the superseding information

. We also deny as moot Scott’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.
and John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended January 3, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Annual Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operation of John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P. and
                  John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III.



                                     /s/ John Q. Hammons
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer,
                                    John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation
                                    III and John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc.,
                                    general partner of John Q. Hammons Hotels,
                                    L.P.


April 1, 2003


                                       52
Case 1:04-cv-00298-PB Document 1-2 Filed 08/10/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00298-PB Document 1-2 Filed 08/10/04 Page 2 of 2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1209

_____________________________

JEMIRAL MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

May 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 12.2

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANYCOMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                               |  | For the Three Months      |      | For the Years Ended
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ---- | -------------------
|                                               |  | Ended March 31,           |      | December 31,       
|                                               |  | 2008                      |      | 2007               
|                                               |  | (Millions, except ratios)
|Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):     |  |                           |      |                    
|                                              
|Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations      |  | $                         | 202  |                    
|Fixed Charges                                  |  |                           | 81   |                    
|Earnings                                       |  | $                         | 283  |                    
|                                               |  |                           |      |                    
|Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B) |  |                           |      |                    
|                                               |  |                           |      |                    
|Interest Expense                               |  | $                         | 81   |                    
|Interest Factor in Rentals                     |  |                           | -    |                    
|Total Fixed Charges                            |  | $                         | 81   |                    
|                                               |  |                           |      |                    
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             |  |                           | 3.49 |                    

|(A) | The term "earnings" shall be defined as pretax income from continuing operations. Add to pretax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(B) | Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b) amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of interest implicit in rentals.                              
|   

---
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6926 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to purchase at-home tests for SARS– 

CoV–2 that are imported from, or manufactured in, the People’s Republic 

of China. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Mrs. HARSHBARGER (for herself, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. GIMENEZ, Mr. 

RESCHENTHALER, Mr. GAETZ, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. BABIN, Mr. 

BROOKS, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. WEBER of Texas, 

Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. TIFFANY, and Mr. DESJARLAIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to purchase at-home 

tests for SARS–CoV–2 that are imported from, or manufactured in, the People’s Republic of China. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Dollars 

5 for Communist China COVID Tests Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6926 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USING FEDERAL FUNDS TO PUR2 CHASE CERTAIN TESTS. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed4 eral funds may be used to purchase any at-home test for 

5 SARS–CoV–2 that is imported from the People’s Republic 

6 of China, or that was manufactured, in whole or in part, 

7 in the People’s Republic of China. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 11.1


                             PITT-DES MOINES, INC.

                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three months ended
                                                                  September 30,
                                                              ---------------------
                                                                 1997        1996
                                                              ----------  ---------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>
Primary
    Average shares outstanding                                 3,506,972   3,485,449
    Dilutive stock options based on treasury stock
       method using average market price                          66,447      42,429
                                                              ----------  ----------
                                                               3,573,419   3,527,878
                                                              ==========  ==========

    Net income                                                $3,197,513  $3,103,422
                                                              ==========  ==========
    Per common share:
       Net income per common share                            $      .90  $      .88
                                                              ==========  ==========
Fully Diluted
    Average shares outstanding                                 3,506,972   3,485,449
    Dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method
       using greater of period-end or average market price        80,579      42,429
                                                              ----------  ----------
                                                               3,587,551   3,527,878
                                                              ==========  ==========
 
    Net income                                                $3,197,513  $3,103,422
                                                              ==========  ==========
    Per common share:
       Net income per common share                            $      .90  $      .88
                                                              ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. Case No. 04-cr-163-01-SM

Bruce LaBarge

ORDER

Re: Document No. 19, Motion for Defendant to be Granted a

Furlough to Attend Funeral

Ruling: Granted. The defendant is hereby temporarily released

from custody on the following terms and conditions. Defendant is

released to the custody of his father, Bruce Labarge, Sr., from

9:30 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 27, 2008, for the sole

purpose of attending the funeral of his aunt and related reception.

Defendant shall report back to the Strafford County House of

Corrections in Dover, New Hampshire no later than 7:00 p.m. on

March 27, 2008. Defendant shall remain in the physical presence of

Bruce Labarge, Sr., during the entire period of release, from 9:30

a.m. until he returns to custody status, and shall be subject to

drug testing at the discretion and direction of the United States

Probation Office. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: March 25, 2008

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

Don Feith, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:04-cr-00163-SM Document 21 Filed 03/25/08 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE ex rel. PERRON v. FUSELIER, Justice of Peace.

No. 1701.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 10, 1937.

Atlee P. Steckler, of Ville Platte, for applicant.

E. H. Guillory, of Ville Platte, for respondent.

OTT, Judge.

This is a companion application to the one made by the same relator against the Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, 173 So. 575, in which the relief asked for by relator was this day denied.-

The relator in this application is asking this court to issue a writ of mandamus to the said justice of the peace ordering and commanding said justice to sustain the plea filed by relator to the jurisdiction of the justice court in the ejectment proceeding filed therein as stated in our opinion in the other case this day decided, and, in the alternative, compelling said justice to sustain relator’s exception to plaintiff’s lack of interest in said ejectment suit; and further prohibiting said justice from executing the judgment of eviction rendered by said justice against relator.

Alternative writs were issued by one of the judges of this court, and in compliance with the order the justice of the peace has filed a return setting up the lack of authority in this court to issue the writs asked for except in aid of its appellate jurisdiction.

As stated in the opinion handed down in the other application, the return of the dis*578trict judge in that case shows that relator took an appeal from the judgment rendered against him in the justice court and that appeal is now pending in the district court. This being true, the justice court no longer has jurisdiction of the case, unless the case should be remanded to the justice court by the district court.

In any event, this court has no authority to issue the writs prayed for by relator as they would not, tinder any conceivable theory, be in aid of the appellate jurisdiction of this court.

For these reasons and for the reasons' given in the case of State ex rel. Duclide Perron v. Fruge, Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court (La.App.) 173 So. 575, this day decided, it is ordered that the alternative writs issued herein, be and the same are hereby recalled, and it is now ordered that relator’s application be dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20969]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Federal Register Notice

DATES: Weeks of September 8, 15, 22, 29, October 6, 13, 2008.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

Week of September 8, 2008

9:30 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting). (Tentative)
    a. U.S. Department of Energy (High Level Waste Repository) DOE's 
Partially Unopposed Motion for Protective Order Governing Classified 
Information (filed May 30, 2008). (Tentative)
    b. U.S. Department of Energy (High Level Waste Repository: Pre-
Application Matters), Docket No. PAPO-00--The DOE's Notice of Appeal 
from the PAPO Board's April 23, 2008 Order and Nye County's Motion to 
File an Amicus Curiae Brief--SRM--SECY-08-0082. (Tentative)

Week of September 15, 2008--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 15, 2008.

Week of September 22, 2008--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 22, 2008.

Week of September 29, 2008--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 29, 2008.

Week of October 6, 2008--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of October 6, 2008.

Week of October 13, 2008--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of October 13, 2008.
* * * * *
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Michelle Schroll, (301) 
415-1662.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at:
    http: //www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g., braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Rohn Brown, at 301-492-2279, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by e-mail at [email protected]. Determinations on requests for reasonable 
accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to [email protected].

    Dated: September 4, 2008.
R. Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20969 Filed 9-5-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00038

- CV

CITY OF FLORESVILLE, TEXAS , City of Floresville City Council, City of Floresville City Planning and Zoning Committee, and the Wilson County Appraisal District

, Appellants

v.

STARNES INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC

,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Cou rt, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 06

- 0367

- CVW Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. Appellee has filed a motion f or extension of time to file its brief, requesting an extension to April 26, 2016. Appellee’s motion is granted. Appellee’s brief is due April 26, 2016. If appellee’s brief is not filed by April 26, 2016, this appeal will be set “at issue” and will be set for submission without an appellee’s brief.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 22-10152 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Bouaphanh Phanyavong, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:21-CR-186-1 

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bouaphanh 

Phanyavong has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Phanyavong has not filed a response. 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

September 9, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-10152 Document: 00516465819 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2022
No. 22-10152 

2 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 22-10152 Document: 00516465819 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/09/2022