Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 030-04794] 

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        William Snell, Senior Health Physicist, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532; telephone: (630) 829-9871;                         *fax*                         number: (630) 515-1259; or by                         *e-mail:*                         at                         *william.snell@nrc.gov.*

#                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                          ( print page 53053)    

## I. Introduction 

                    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proposing to terminate Byproduct Materials License No. 21-01443-06. This license is held by Warner-Lambert, LLC (the Licensee), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc., for its facilities located at 2800 Plymouth Road and 1600 Huron Parkway in Ann Arbor, Michigan (the Facilities). Termination of the license would authorize release of the Facilities for unrestricted use. The Licensee requested this action in a letter dated June 3, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML081610504). The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of this proposed action in accordance with the requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The license will be terminated following the publication of this FONSI and EA in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

## II. Environmental Assessment 

### Identification of Proposed Action 

The proposed action would approve the Licensee's June 3, 2008, license termination request, resulting in release of the Facilities for unrestricted use. License No. 21-01443-06 was issued on April 20, 1959, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 30, and has been amended periodically since that time. The license authorizes the use of byproduct materials for conducting research and development. 

The Facilities comprise a campus of research laboratories and offices of more than two million square feet of floor area on approximately 50 acres of property located in a commercial and residential area. The Licensee ceased using licensed materials in the Facilities in May 2007, and has conducted final status surveys of the Facilities. The results of these surveys along with other supporting information were provided to the NRC to demonstrate that the criteria in Subpart E of 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted release have been met. 

### Need for the Proposed Action 

The licensee has ceased conducting licensed activities at the Facilities, and seeks the unrestricted use of its Facilities. 

### Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action 

The historical review of licensed activities conducted at the Facilities shows that such activities involved use of the following radionuclides with half-lives greater than 120 days: hydrogen-3, carbon-14, sodium-22, chlorine-36, calcium-45, calcium-47, iron-55, cobalt-60, nickel-63, zinc-65, strontium-90, antimony-125, barium-133, and cesium-137. Prior to performing the final status survey, the Licensee conducted decontamination activities, as necessary, in the areas of the Facilities affected by these radionuclides. 

The Licensee conducted onsite final status surveys on the Facilities from February 24 to April 23, 2008. The final status survey report was attached to the Licensee's amendment request dated June 3, 2008. The Licensee elected to demonstrate compliance with the radiological criteria for unrestricted release as specified in 10 CFR 20.1402 by using the screening approach described in NUREG-1757, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,” Volume 2. The Licensee used the radionuclide-specific derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs), developed there by the NRC, which comply with the dose criterion in 10 CFR 20.1402. These DCGLs define the maximum amount of residual radioactivity on building surfaces, equipment, and materials, and in soils, that will satisfy the NRC requirements in Subpart E of 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted release. The Licensee's final status survey results were below these DCGLs and are in compliance with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) requirement of 10 CFR 20.1402. The NRC thus finds that the Licensee's final status survey results are acceptable. 

Based on its review, the staff determined that the affected environment and any environmental impacts associated with the proposed action are bounded by the impacts evaluated by the “Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities” (NUREG-1496) Volumes 1-3 (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385). The staff finds there were no significant environmental impacts from the use of radioactive material at the Facility. The NRC staff reviewed the docket file records and the final status survey report to identify any non-radiological hazards that may have impacted the environment surrounding the Facility. No such hazards or impacts to the environment were identified. The NRC has identified no other radiological or non-radiological activities in the area that could result in cumulative environmental impacts. 

The NRC staff finds that the proposed termination of the license and release of the Facilities for unrestricted use is in compliance with 10 CFR 20. Based on its review, the staff considered the impact of the residual radioactivity at the Facilities and concluded that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. 

### Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

Due to the largely administrative nature of the proposed action, its environmental impacts are small. Therefore, the only alternative the staff considered is the no-action alternative, under which the staff would leave things as they are by simply denying the amendment request. This no-action alternative is not feasible because it conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d) requiring that decommissioning of byproduct material facilities be completed and approved by the NRC after licensed activities cease. The NRC's analysis of the Licensee's final status survey data confirmed that the Facilities meet the requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release. Additionally, denying the amendment request would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the no-action alternative are therefore similar, and the no-action alternative is accordingly not further considered. 

### Conclusion 

The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action is consistent with the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action is the preferred alternative. 

### Agencies and Persons Consulted 

NRC provided a draft of this Environmental Assessment to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for review on July 23, 2008. By response dated July 24, 2008, the State agreed with the conclusions of the EA, and otherwise provided no comments. 

                    The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is of a procedural nature, and will not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The NRC staff has also determined that the proposed action is not the type of activity that has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. Therefore, no further consultation is required                           ( print page 53054)                        under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.                 

## III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed action. On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted. Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. 

## IV. Further Information 

                    Documents related to this action, including the application for license amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at                     *http://www.nrc.gov/​reading-rm/​adams.html*. From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. The documents related to this action are listed below, along with their ADAMS accession numbers.                 

1. Carol Lentz, Pfizer, Inc., letter to Patricia Pelke, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 3, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML081610504); 

2. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E, “Radiological Criteria for License Termination”; 

3. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions”; 

4. NUREG-1496, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities”; 

5. NUREG-1757, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance.” 

6. By response dated July 24, 2008, the State had no comments. 

                    If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to                     *pdr@nrc.gov.*                     These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee.                 

Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 29th day of August 2008.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Christine Lipa, 

Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III.

[FR Doc. E8-21274 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P