alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 36917

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

RANDALL MARK OSTERHOUT

,

Defendant-Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 491

Filed: June 2, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, S tate of Idaho, Twin

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; S arah E. Tompkins, Deputy

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney

General, Boise, for respondent.

________________ ______________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Randall Mark Osterhout entered an Alford 1 plea to possession of a controlled substance,

methamphetamine . I.C. § 37

- 2732(c)(1)

. In e xchange for his guilty plea, an allegation that

Osterhout was a persistent violator was dismissed. The district court sentenced Osterhout to a

unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years , to run concurrent

with an unrelated sentence

. Osterhout filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the district court denied.

Osterhout appeals.

1 See North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970).2

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excess ive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the

record, including the new information submitted with Osterhout ’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude

no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Osterhout ’s

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Ethics Subcommittee, Advisory Committee to the Director, Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention announce the following Subcommittee meeting.

    Name: Ethics Subcommittee, Advisory Committee to the Director.
    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-1:30 p.m., EDT, Thursday, September 25, 
2008.
    Place: This meeting will be held by conference call. The call in 
number is (866) 919-3560 and entering code 4168828.
    Status: Open to the public. The public is welcome to comment 
during the public comment period which is tentatively scheduled from 
1 p.m.-1:15 p.m.
    Purpose: The Ethics Subcommittee will provide counsel to the 
ACD, CDC regarding a broad range of public health ethics questions 
and issues arising from programs, scientists and practitioners.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items will include review of 
ethics guidance for public health emergency preparedness and 
response.
    For Further Information Contact: For more information about this 
meeting contact Drue Barrett, PhD., Designated Federal Official, 
Ethics Subcommittee, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., M/S D-50, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, Telephone (404)639-4690, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c383e3d2e2e3928281c3f383f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c080e0d1e1e0918182c0f080f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 4, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-20967 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                       419
<INVENTORY>                                      8,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,680
<PP&E>                                          52,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,296
<BONDS>                                         44,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,867
<COMMON>                                         3,151
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,701
<SALES>                                        125,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,166
<CGS>                                           95,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,692
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75


</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2022-2813 

LT Case No. 2021-CC-000620 

_____________________________ 

MORNINGSTAR ASSISTED LIVING,

LLC,

Appellant,

v.

SAFEPOINT INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Marion County. 

Lori Cotton, Judge. 

Brandon S. Vesley, of The Florida Appellate Firm, P.A., St. 

Petersburg, for Appellant. 

Patrick M. Chidnese, of B.C.S. Appellate Practice, and Frieda C. 

Lindroth, of Bickford & Chidnese, LLP, Tampa, for Appellee. 

May 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 *








In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the  period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer


Laurence A. Schiffer


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) May 16, 2011








*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE> 1

                                   Exhibit 32.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




     Date: August 13, 2010

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, 
U.S. Department of Commerce 14th and Constitution Ave., NW, Room 2104 
Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 A.M. 
and 5:00 P.M. in Room 2104, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Docket Number: 08-040. Applicant: New Mexico Institute of Mining and 
Technology; Magdalena Ridge Observatory, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New 
Mexico 87801. Instrument: Unit Telescope. Manufacturer: Advanced 
Mechanical and Optical Systems SA (AMOS), Belgium. Intended Use: The 
instrument is intended to be used to study star formation and the 
earliest stages of planet formation, fundamental astrophysical 
phenomena like mass accretion, mass transfer and convection in single 
and binary star systems, and the surroundings of the centers of nearby 
galaxies. These phenomena will be studied at optical and near infrared 
wavelengths from about 0.5 to 2.5 microns. The instrument must be able 
to be relocated and the functions of the instrument must be controlled 
and monitored over a network connection. Another unique feature of this 
instrument is that it must have an aperture greater than one-meter. 
Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: July 25, 2008.
Docket Number: 08-042. Applicant: University of Alabama at Birmingham, 
701 South 20th St., Birmingham, AL 35294. Instrument: FIE Vitrobot. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: The 
instrument is intended to be used to prepare a range of biological 
samples for imaging by cryo-electron microscopy. Samples to be studied 
include viruses and virus-related particles, protein complexes, 
protein-nucleic acid, lipid-containing samples, filamentous structures, 
subcellular organelles, and entire prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. A 
unique feature of this instrument is that it must have a controlled 
environmental chamber and have the capability of fully automated 
operation. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: August 12, 
2008.

    Dated: September 4, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-21000 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# 0. Readme

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#		

# 1. Product Class Descriptions

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#		

# 2. Annual Product Price Indexes

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#		

# 3. Quarterly Product Price Ind.

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#		

# 4. Annual Industry Price Ind.

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#		

# 5. Industry Weights

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#		

# 6. Sources and Methods

&"Calibri"&11&K000000PUBLIC/OFFICIAL RELEASE // EXTERNAL&1#
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 20

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the right to life.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BAKER, Mr. BARCIA,

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Ms.

HART, Mr. HAYES, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. TANCREDO, and

Mr. TERRY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the right to life.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, to be valid only if ratified

6 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

7 within seven years after the date of final passage of this

8 joint resolution:
2

HJ 20 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. With respect to the right to life, the

3 word ‘person’ as used in this article and in the fifth and

4 fourteenth articles of amendment to the Constitution of

5 the United States applies to all human beings irrespective

6 of age, health, function, or condition of dependency, in7 cluding their unborn offspring at every stage of their bio8 logical development.

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. No unborn person shall be deprived of

10 life by any person: Provided, however, That nothing in this

11 article shall prohibit a law permitting only those medical

12 procedures required to prevent the death of the mother.

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress and the several States

14 shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate leg15 islation.’’.

Æ
#### McKee, Commr. of Accounts, et al. *v.*The State, ex rel. Scobell, Commr. of Purchases & Supplies.

(No. 24362

Decided November 29, 1933.)

*Mr. W. George Kerr,*director of law, *Mr. Frederick W. Frey*and *Mr. William C. Dixon,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Baker, Hostetler, Sidlo S Patterson*and *Mr. Lockwood Thompson,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of *State, ex rel. Bryson,*v. *Smith, Secy. of State,*101 Ohio St., 203, and *State, ex rel. Day, State Treas.,*v. *Emmons et al., State Civil Service Comm.,*126 Ohio St., 19.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000077242
<NAME> PG ENERGY INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  246,218,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  4,644,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      62,065,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    36,483,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             349,410,000
<COMMON>                                    33,142,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   32,678,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         38,641,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             104,461,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          739,000
<PREFERRED>                                 18,804,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        65,392,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               58,279,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       80,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             101,655,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              349,410,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   79,939,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         5,831,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  63,244,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  69,075,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     10,864,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             239,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              11,103,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,329,000
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,774,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    353,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                8,421,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                    4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      19,608,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.54
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee (ETRAC) will meet on September 23, 2008, at 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 4830, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on technical questions that affect controls on research and emerging technology activities, including those related to deemed exports.

## Agenda

1. Welcome and introductions.

2. Remarks from Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) management.

3. Current deemed export control policy issues and initiatives, including BIS's notice of inquiry published on May 19, 2008 (73 FR 28795) and extended on August 22, 2008 (73 FR 49645) requesting comments on two Deemed Export Advisory Committee recommendations.

4. Emerging technology and research and development issues.

5. U.S. competitiveness.

6. Public comments.

7. Priorities and workplan.

                    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov,*                     no later than September 16, 2008.                

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. To the extent that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the                           ( print page 52266)                        Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to the Committee members, presenters should forward the public presentation materials one week prior to the meeting date to Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.*

For more information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-2813.

Dated: September 4, 2008.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-20904 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
## I i II

Ipletea that the tax ohou1.d be dw only Ln sare'tlieparohaesr18 a renident or thieBtatti

et tdw tima oi puWhm30 ae well,

am 

### at the tlw he bring8the car into this Stats. As not& from the above,a oontrary 

## oenrrtrwtion

la not required,

eitherto allminate the **taaptatlon or**  **buyeawte** . plaoe thmlr 

### ordera in othor e8atw in order to euaapa*ha ralw tax or to **brlalg** about equality of coail?etitioa **trotmen** 

### real dmler* ln thlr X3tota an4 theother.rtwto. Our **eumwer**

**to yogi**  **qucotlcm, therefore,**  2ithat .ths an tax **is not**  **boa** an4er **th& ‘**  **tact** rltuction ebove outlined; Shei&er~the'eatombila

wee parohee~4’ befose cwaftar t&W 1, 19&l, the **0fre0tiro** date of maa Bill. 8x18~

lwiatiwlr1. I. ;.;:;

Toutia- *err. tki I