alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,523
<SECURITIES>                                     4,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,273)
<INVENTORY>                                     45,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               276,802
<PP&E>                                       2,266,770
<DEPRECIATION>                               (953,860)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,736,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,027
<BONDS>                                        588,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,378
<COMMON>                                       447,700
<OTHER-SE>                                     336,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,736,969
<SALES>                                        174,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,691
<CGS>                                          104,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,736
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,736
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>*All common stock is owned by parent, no EPS required.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 22, 2014

t1015 

# Order

Clerk October 22, 2014

149580

MATTHEW COLE, Plaintiff

- Appelle e,

v SC: 149580 COA: 313824 Macomb CC: 2012

- 000263

- NO HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and

we REMAND this case to the Macomb Circuit Court for entry of an order granting summary disposition to the defendant. The Court of Appeals erred by affirming the circuit court’s determination that the hazard that caused the plaintiff’s slip and fall was

not an open and obvious danger that an average user of ordinary intelligence would discover on casual inspection. Hoffner v Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450, 461 (2012). Here, the

so

- called “black ice” was detected by four other witnesses who viewed the premises after the plai ntiff’s accident. There were several patches of ice evident in the area where the plaintiff fell. In addition, there were numerous indicia of a potentially hazardous condition being present, Janson v Sajewski Funeral Home, Inc, 486 Mich 934 (2010),

inclu ding seven inches of snow on the ground, some precipitation the previous day, and a recent thaw followed by consistent temperatures below freezing. A reasonably prudent person would foresee the danger of icy conditions on the mid

- winter night the plaintif f’s accident occurred. In light of the open and obvious nature of the hazard in this case, we do not consider the defendant’s arguments regarding the applicability of MCL 600.2955a.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,252
<INVENTORY>                                    125,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,222
<PP&E>                                         484,191
<DEPRECIATION>                               (251,005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,072,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          346,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,792
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,072,365
<SALES>                                        323,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,853
<CGS>                                          151,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,565
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR Part 404.6, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of US Patent No. US 7,416,158 entitled “Continuous Disreefing Apparatus for Parachute” issued August 26, 2008. This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Jeffrey DiTullio at U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone: (508) 233-4184 or e-mail:                         *Jeffrey.Ditullio@us.army.mil*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-21288 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission

# ACTION:

Notice

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the Federal Trade Commission’s Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Leydon, Director of Human Resources, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326- 2633.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Publication of the Performance Review Board (PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314 (c)(4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive’s performance by the supervisor, and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings, performance awards, and pay-for-performance pay adjustments to the FTC Chairman.

The following individuals have been designated to serve on the FTC’s Performance Review Board:

Charles H. Schneider, Chairman

William Blumenthal

Pauline M. Ippolito

Lydia B. Parnes

David P. Wales

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

[FR Doc. E8-20571 Filed 9-4-08: 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1777-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Michigan (FEMA-1777-DR), dated July 14, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 27, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Michigan is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 14, 2008.

Saginaw County for Public Assistance. 

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,                               ( print page 52406)                            Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)                    

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-20819 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Acknowledgment of Assignment



 Exhibit 10.28.1 
  
 [Letterhead of State Street Bank and Trust Company] 
  
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSIGNMENT 
  

November 2, 2004 
  
 Stephen S. Smith 
 Smith Asset Management Group, LP 
 200 Crescent Court, Suite 850 
 Dallas, TX 75201 
  

	 	Re:	Investment Advisor Agreement, dated October 26, 2004 between State Street Bank and Trust Company and [Investment Advisor] relating to the American Bar Association Members/State
Street Collective Trust (“Trust”) 

  
 Ladies and
Gentlemen: 
  
 This is to notify you that effective December 1,
2004, State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”) will be replaced as trustee of the Trust by State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire, a New Hampshire Trust Company and wholly-owned subsidiary of State Street
(“State Street Trust Company”). 
  
 In connection with
the appointment of State Street Trust Company as trustee of the Trust, State Street hereby assigns its rights under the Investment Advisor Agreement to State Street Trust Company, and State Street Trust Company agrees to assume all of such rights
and all obligations under the Investment Advisor Agreement as of a effective date. 
  
 By countersigning this letter below and returning it to us, you acknowledge and agree to such assignment and that State Street Trust Company will be deemed your counterparty for all purposes under the Investment
Advisory Agreement effective as of December 1, 2004. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

							
	State Street Bank and Trust Company	 	State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire
				
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Beth Halberstadt

	 	 By:
	  	 /s/ Gary Jenkins


	 Name:
	  	 Beth Halberstadt
	 	 Name:
	  	 Gary Jenkins

	 Title:
	  	 Vice President
	 	 Title:
	  	 Director

			
	Smith Asset Management Group, LP	 	 	  	 
				
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Stephen S. Smith

	 	 	  	 
	 Name:
	  	 Stephen S. Smith, CFA
	 	 	  	 
	 Title:
	  	 Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.3




Exhibit
10.3

 

Summary
of the Award Levels and Performance Goals

for
the Named Executive Officers

of
Brown Shoe Company, Inc.

 


	 	
      Incentive
      Award as a Percentage of Base Salary (1)
      (2)

	
      Name
      and Title of Executive Officer
	
      Minimum
	
      Target
	
      Maximum

	
      Ronald
      A. Fromm

          Chairman of the
      Board and Chief Executive Officer
	
      0%
	
      75%
	
      150%

	
      Diane
      M. Sullivan

          President
	
      0
	
      70
	
      140

	
      Joseph
      W. Wood

          President,
      Famous Footwear
	
      0
	
      65
	
      130

	
      David
      H. Schwartz

          Chief
      Administrative Officer and President, Brown Shoe
    International
	
      0
	
      60
	
      120

	
      Gary
      M. Rich

          President,
      Brown Shoe Wholesale
	
      0
	
      60
	
      120















	(1)  	
      Effective
      January 30, 2005, performance goals will be measured primarily on the
      Company’s annual net earnings, earnings from continuing operations and
      divisional gross margins.




 

 


	(2)  	
      Under
      the Brown Shoe Company, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”),
      executive officers of the Company participating in the Plan may defer up
      to 100% of the Annual Incentive Plan award. The amount of compensation to
      be deferred by each participant will be determined in accordance with the
      Plan based on elections made by the participant. The amount of
      compensation deferred under the Plan, together with interest thereon
      computed at the prime rate, will be paid in a single lump sum payment or
      in equal annual installments over a period of 15 years upon the
      participant’s retirement, termination, death, disability or other dates
      determined in accordance with the Plan.
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 87

Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a

repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent

nuclear fuel, pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 11, 2002

Mr. BARTON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. UPTON, Mr. TOWNS,

Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. BURR of North Carolina, Mr. WYNN, Mr. WHITFIELD,

Mr. RUSH, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. SHIMKUS, and Mr. PICKERING) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for the development of a repository for the disposal of high-level

radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, pursuant to

the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That there hereby is approved the site at Yucca Mountain,

4 Nevada, for a repository, with respect to which a notice

5 of disapproval was submitted by the Governor of the State

6 of Nevada on April 8, 2002.

Æ
Exhibit
10.23


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 2


TO THE


DURATEK,
INC.


DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN


 


Duratek, Inc. (the “Company”) wishes to amend the
Duratek, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) to address the
distribution of amounts credited to accounts under the Plan which are
attributable to the surrender of awards under the GTS Duratek, Inc. 1999 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”).


 


Accordingly,
effective May 15, 2003, the Plan is amended as follows:


 


1.                                       A new Sub Section 4.8(e) is added to the
Plan to read as follows:


 


e)  Unless the Company, in its sole discretion,
permits otherwise, any distribution of a Participant’s Incentive Plan
Contribution Credit Sub-Accounts shall be in the form of common stock of the
Company.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective
as specified herein.


 


	
  ATTEST/WITNESS:

  	
  DURATEK, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  DIANE R. BROWN

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  ROBERT F. SHAWVER

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Print
  Name:

  	
  Diane
  R. Brown

  	
   

  	
  Print
  Name:

  	
  Robert
  F. Shawver

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Print
  Title:

  	
  Executive
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  March 10,
  2005

  	
   

  
												



 


1
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors



StoneCo Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-230629)
on Form S-8 of StoneCo. Ltd. (“the Company”) of our report dated March 15, 2019, with respect to the consolidated
statements of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statement of profit
or loss and other comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and the related notes, which report appears in the December 31,
2018 annual report on Form 20-F of the Company.





/s/ ERNST & YOUNG Auditores Independentes S.S.





São Paulo, Brazil

April 29,
2019
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Maxco, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence O. Fields, as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            This
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            Information
                contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




Date: 
      February 3, 2006


/s/
      LAWRENCE O. FIELDS


Lawrence
      O. Fields


Chief
      Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


-25-
October 14 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROBERT DALE HARGER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00959

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.