alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 6

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Commodore John Barry as the first flag officer 

of the United States Navy.

Whereas John Barry, American merchant marine captain and 

native of County Wexford, Ireland, volunteered his services to the Continental Navy during the American War 

for Independence and was assigned by the Continental 

Congress as captain of the Lexington, taking command
2

HJ 6 RFS 

of that vessel on March 14, 1776, and later participating in 

the victorious Trenton campaign; 

Whereas the quality and effectiveness of Captain John Barry’s service to the American war effort was recognized 

not only by George Washington but also by the enemies 

of the new Nation; 

Whereas Captain John Barry rejected British General Lord 

Howe’s flattering offer to desert Washington and the patriot cause, stating: ‘‘Not the value and command of the 

whole British fleet can lure me from the cause of my 

country.’’; 

Whereas Captain John Barry, while in command of the frigate Alliance, successfully transported French gold to 

America to help finance the American War for Independence and also won numerous victories at sea; 

Whereas when the First Congress, acting under the new Constitution of the United States, authorized the raising and 

construction of the United States Navy, it was to Captain 

John Barry that President George Washington turned to 

build and lead the new Nation’s infant Navy, the successor to the Continental Navy of the War for Independence; 

Whereas Captain John Barry supervised the building of his 

flagship, the U.S.S. United States; 

Whereas on February 22, 1797, President Washington personally conferred upon Captain John Barry, by and with 

the advice and consent of the Senate, the rank of Captain, with ‘‘Commission No. 1’’, United States Navy, 

dated June 7, 1794; 

Whereas John Barry served as the senior officer of the 

United States Navy, with the title of ‘‘Commodore’’ (in 
3

HJ 6 RFS 

official correspondence), under Presidents Washington, 

John Adams, and Jefferson; 

Whereas as commander of the first United States naval 

squadron under the Constitution of the United States, 

which included the U.S.S. Constitution (‘‘Old Ironsides’’), 

John Barry was a Commodore, with the right to fly a 

broad pendant, which made him a flag officer; and 

Whereas in this sense it can be said that Commodore John 

Barry was the first flag officer of the United States 

Navy: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Commodore John Barry is recognized, and is hereby 

4 honored, as the first flag officer of the United States 

5 Navy.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-211]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Copayment for Medication

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is hereby giving 
notice that there is no change in the medication copayment rate for 
calendar year 2008 and the rate will remain at $8.00. The total amount 
of copayments in a calendar year for a veteran enrolled in one of the 
Priority Groups 2 through 6 shall not exceed the cap of $960.00. These 
rates are based on the Prescription Drug component of the Medical 
Consumer Price Index as cited in title 38, Code of Federal Regulations, 
part 17, Sec.  17.110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business 
Policy (163), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 254-0406. (This is not a toll-free number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA is required by law to charge certain 
veterans a copayment for each 30-day or less supply of medication 
provided on an outpatient basis (other than medication administered 
during treatment) for treatment of a non-service connected condition. 
Public Law 106-117, the Veterans' Millennium Health Care and Benefits 
Act, gives the Secretary of Veterans Affairs authority to increase the 
medication copayment amount and to establish a calendar year cap on the 
amount of medication copayments charged to veterans enrolled in 
Priority Groups 2 through 6. When veterans reach the calendar year cap, 
they will continue to receive medications without additional copayments 
for that calendar year.

Formula for Calculating the Medication Copayment Amount

    Each calendar year beginning after December 31, 2002, the 
Prescription Drug component of the Medical Consumer Price Index of the 
previous September 30 is divided by the Index as of September 30, 2001. 
The ratio is then multiplied by the original copayment amount of $7.00. 
The copayment amount of the new calendar year is then rounded down to 
the whole dollar amount.

Computation of Calendar Year 2008 Medication Copayment Amount

    a. Prescription Drug Medical Consumer Price Index as of September 
30, 2007 = 370.9.
    b. Prescription Drug Medical Consumer Price Index as of September 
30, 2001 = 304.8.
    c. Index = 370.9 divided by 304.8 = 1.2168.
    d. (INDEX) x $7= $8.52.
    e. Copayment amount = $8.00.

    Dated: January 3, 2008.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
 [FR Doc. E8-211 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
exv10w37



 




Exhibit 10.37


VITRIA TECHNOLOGY, INC.

1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD GRANT NOTICE




VITRIA TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the “Company”), pursuant to its 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), hereby awards to Participant the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock set forth
below (“Award”). This Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth herein and
in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement, the Plan, the form of Assignment Separate from Certificate
and the form of Joint Escrow Instructions, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein
in their entirety.



	 	 	 
	Participant:
	 	 
	

	 	

	Date of Grant:
	 	 
	

	 	

	Vesting Commencement Date:
	 	 
	

	 	

	Number of Shares Subject to Award:
	 	 
	

	 	

	Consideration:

	 	[in consideration for services]
	

	 	







	 	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:

	 	[1/4th  of the shares vest one year after the Vesting Commencement Date.
	

	 	1/48th of the shares vest monthly thereafter over the next three
years.]






Additional Terms/Acknowledgements: The undersigned Participant acknowledges receipt of, and
understands and agrees to, this Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Award
Agreement and the Plan. Participant further acknowledges that as of the Date of Grant, this
Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Award Agreement and the Plan set forth
the entire understanding between Participant and the Company regarding the acquisition of stock in
the Company and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the exception
of (i) Awards previously granted and delivered to Participant under the Plan, and (ii) the
following agreements only:



	 	 	 
	OTHER AGREEMENTS:
	 	 
	

	 	

	

	 	







	 	 	 
	VITRIA TECHNOLOGY, INC.

	 	PARTICIPANT:
	 
	By: _______________________________________

	 	____________________________________________
	 

	 	 
	Signature

	 	Signature
	Name: _____________________________________

	 	Name: ______________________________________
	Title: ______________________________________

	 	Date: _______________________________________
	Date: ______________________________________
	 	 







	 	 	 
	ATTACHMENTS:

	 	Restricted Stock Award Agreement, 1999 Equity Incentive
Plan, form of Assignment Separate from Certificate and
form of Joint Escrow Instructions.






1









 





ATTACHMENT I

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT




2









 





ATTACHMENT II

1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




3









 





ATTACHMENT III

FORM OF ASSIGNMENT SEPARATE FROM CERTIFICATE




4









 





ATTACHMENT IV




5









 





FORM OF JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS





6
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7139 

To codify Executive Order 13949. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mr. PFLUGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To codify Executive Order 13949. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Arms from 

5 Terrorists Through Sanctions Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENACTMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 13949. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The provisions of Executive Order 

8 13949 (85 Fed. Reg. 60043; relating to blocking property 

9 of certain persons with respect to the conventional arms 

10 activities of Iran), as in effect on September 21, 2020, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7139 IH

1 shall remain in effect, continue to apply, and are enacted 

2 into law. 

3 (b) PUBLICATION.—In publishing this Act in slip 

4 form and in the United States Statutes at Large pursuant 

5 to section 112 of title 1, United States Code, the Archivist 

6 of the United States shall include after the date of ap7 proval at the end an appendix setting forth the text of 

8 the Executive order referred to in subsection (a), as in 

9 effect on September 21, 2020. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Donald E. Gaines, Vice President Finance, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.


Date:  May 10, 2011/s/Donald E. GainesDonald E. GainesVice President Finance, Treasurer

and Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2019

izm

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2019

159817 (21)

In re GOLDMAN

_____________________________________

LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 159817

CoA: 348483

KALAMAZOO CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is 

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable 

for filing fees.

Initially, MCL 600.2963(8) does not bar the present application based on 

outstanding fees appellant owes this Court in Goldman v Dept of Corrections, MSC 155758 

under In re Jackson, __ Mich App __ (Docket No. 339724, issued December 27, 2018) 

because this application relates to an underlying criminal case and it is manifest that 

appellant cannot currently pay the outstanding fees.

Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for an appeal to be 

filed, within 21 days of the date of this order, appellant shall submit a copy of this 

order and refile the copy of the pleadings returned with this order. By doing this, 

appellant becomes responsible to pay the $375.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this 

order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court.

If appellant timely refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the 

Department of Corrections in the amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s 

account until the payments equal the balance due of $375.00. This amount shall then be 

remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8), appellant shall not file a new civil action or appeal 

in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant and return 

a copy of appellant’s pleadings with this order.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hews Company, LLC

v. Civil No. 04-cv-292-JM

Bruce Barnaby and

Barnaby’s Truck & Equipment, Inc.

O R D E R

 Pursuant to N.H. RSA 304-C:47, Bruce Barnaby’s interest in

L&B Barnaby, LLC is charged with payment of the unsatisfied

amount of the judgment in this matter with interest. All

payments that would be made to or for the benefit of Bruce

Barnaby (including to any entity in which Bruce Barnaby has an

interest) shall instead be paid to the Hews Company, LLC in care

of its attorney, Peter G. Callaghan, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau,

Pachois & Haley, PLLP, 57 North Main Street, P.O. Box 1318,

Concord, New Hampshire 03302-1318, (603)410-1500. 

Bruce Barnaby shall provide on a monthly basis to counsel

for Hews a statement of the L&B Barnaby, LLC’s income and

expenditures. To the extent it provides a complete statement, a

monthly bank statement together with copies of checks, deposits

and withdrawals shall be sufficient to comply with this

disclosure requirement. Bruce Barnaby shall also provide a copy

Case 1:04-cv-00292-JM Document 66 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 2
2

of all L&B Barnaby, LLC state and federal tax filings to counsel

for Hews at the time filed. Bruce Barnaby shall immediately

advise counsel for Hews of any threatened, contemplated or actual

change to his interest in the LLC or to the management of the

LLC. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 22, 2005

cc: Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.

 Timothy J. Bryant, Esq.

 William S. Gannon, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00292-JM Document 66 Filed 11/22/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

ChannelBind International Corp.

v. Case No. 05-cv-251-PB

Primaknit, Inc., et al.

ORDER

Re: Document No. 4, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of

Subject Matter and Personal Jurisdiction

Ruling: Defendants argue that the court lacks diversity

jurisdiction because the plaintiff and both defendants are citizens

of South Carolina. Plaintiff alleges in its complaint that it is

a New Hampshire corporation with a New Hampshire address and a

place of business in South Carolina. Defendants charge in their

motion to dismiss that plaintiff’s principal place of business is

in South Carolina. Plaintiff responds with a general denial and

claims that: (1) its patents are not located in South Carolina; (2)

more than 50% of its net income is derived from international

business; and (3) its supplier for international sales is located

in Taiwan. It has failed, however, to identify a place other than

its South Carolina facility as its principal place of business.

Such allegations are insufficient to rebut defendants’ contention

that plaintiff’s principal place of business is in South Carolina.

Motion granted.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

District Judge

Date: October 3, 2005

cc: Timothy Sheedy, Esq.

James F. Laboe, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00251-PB Document 8 Filed 10/03/05 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11411]


Florida Disaster Number FL-00036

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida 
(FEMA-1785-DR), dated 08/24/2008.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Fay.
    Incident Period: 08/18/2008 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 08/26/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/23/2008.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/25/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Florida, dated 08/24/2008, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.
Primary Counties: Baker, Bradford, Collier, Gadsden, Glades, Hardee, 
Hendry, Union.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Florida: Alachua, Broward, Calhoun, Charlotte, Clay, Columbia, De 
Soto, Duval, Hillsborough, Jackson, Lee, Leon, Liberty, Manatee, 
Nassau, Putnam.
    Georgia: Charleton, Clinch, Decatur, Grady, Seminole, Ware.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002 and 59008)


Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-20845 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 179 (Monday, September 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 53249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21395]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on 
Tuesday, September 16, 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant 
to section 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (9)(A)(ii), and (9)(B) 
of Title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to the 
Corporation's supervisory and corporate activities.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

    Dated: September 9, 2008.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21395 Filed 9-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.6

Certification Pursuant to Rules13a-14 and 15d-14
of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act

I, E. James Ferland, certify
that:

1.

I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PSEG Energy Holdings
L.L.C.;

2.

Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report
any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:   October 30, 2003 | /s/ E. James
  Ferland       
|------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                         |                              
|                         | E. James Ferland             
|                         | PSEG Energy
  Holdings L.L.C.
|                         | Chief
  Executive Officer