alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Robert E. Busch, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report
of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service
Electric and Gas Company.


                                   /s/ Robert E. Busch
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Robert E. Busch
                                   Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   July 30, 2004
#### MARTIN COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. Charles N. BOOS and Clarissa M. Boos, his Wife, and other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Oct. 22, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.3

Section 302 Certification

I, Joseph J. Berns, Vice President- Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plymouth
Rubber Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

(b) [Omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 12, 2004              /s/ Joseph J. Berns
                                  -------------------------
                                      Joseph J. Berns
                            Vice President-Finance and Chief
                                     Financial Officer
NO. 12-15-00042-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ELROY EDWARDS, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 217TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant 

and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion 

to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered March 25, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 25, 2015

NO. 12-15-00042-CR

ELROY EDWARDS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 217th District Court 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-0280)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Acknowledgment of Assignment



 Exhibit 10.27.1 
  
 [Letterhead of State Street Bank and Trust Company] 
  
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSIGNMENT 
  

November 2, 2004 
  
 Amy Morse, CFA 
 Wellington Management Company, LLP 
 75 State Street 
 Boston, MA 02109 
  

	 	Re:	Investment Advisor Agreement, dated October 26, 2004 between State Street Bank and Trust Company and Wellington Management Company, LLP relating to the American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (“Trust”) 

  
 Ladies
and Gentlemen: 
  
 This is to notify you that effective December
1, 2004, State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”) will be replaced as trustee of the Trust by State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire, a New Hampshire Trust Company and wholly-owned subsidiary of State Street
(“State Street Trust Company”). 
  
 In connection with
the appointment of State Street Trust Company as trustee of the Trust, State Street hereby assigns its rights under the Investment Advisor Agreement to State Street Trust Company, and State Street Trust Company agrees to assume all of such rights
and all obligations under the Investment Advisor Agreement as of a effective date. 
  
 By countersigning this letter below and returning it to us, you acknowledge and agree to such assignment and that State Street Trust Company will be deemed your counterparty for all purposes under the Investment
Advisory Agreement effective as of December 1, 2004. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

							
	State Street Bank and Trust Company	 	State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire
				
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Beth Halberstadt

	 	 By:
	  	 /s/ Gary Jenkins


	 Name:
	  	 Beth Halberstadt
	 	 Name:
	  	 Gary Jenkins

	 Title:
	  	 Vice President
	 	 Title:
	  	 Director

			
	Wellington Management Company, LLP	 	 	  	 
				
	 By:
	  	 /s/ Diane C. Nordin

	 	 	  	 
	 Name:
	  	 Diane C. Nordin
	 	 	  	 
	 Title:
	  	 Senior Vice President
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37867

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

JASON CORY TIEDEMAN ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublished Op inion No. 404

Filed: March 23, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, St ate of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John T. Mitchell , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty

- five years, with a minimum period of confinement of fo ur years , for kidnapping in the second degree

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Jordan E. Taylor , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawre nce G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

______________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jason Cory Tiedeman pled guilty to kidnapping in the second degree

, I.C. § § 18

- 4501,

18

- 4503, and aggravated battery, I.C. §§ 18

- 903, 18

- 907. The district court sentenced Tiedeman

to a unified term of twenty

- five years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years for

kidnapping in the second degree

, and a concurrent unified term of fifteen years with a minimum

period of confinement of four years for aggravated battery. Tiedeman appeals only as to the

indeterminate sentence for kidnapping in the second degree.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed t he record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Tiedeman ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elias Solorzano, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered May 27, 1988, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. The complainant’s testimony that defendant grabbed her by the arm, dragged her to the bedroom, threw her down on the bed, and forced her to have intercourse with him while he held her hands, as she repeatedly told him to stop and cried during the attack, is sufficient to establish forcible compulsion (see, *People v Fuller,*50 NY2d 628; *People v Gonzalez,*136 AD2d 735; *People v Urso,*132 AD2d 769).

In addition, resolution of issues of credibility and the weight to be accorded the evidence presented are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them either to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Ingram,*67 NY2d 897, 899; *People v Ortiz,*54 NY2d 288; *People v Medina,*53 NY2d 951; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105; *People v Booker,*145 AD2d 564; *People v Jefferson,*136 AD2d 655, 657; 2 *435CJI[NY] PL 130.35 [1], at 401, 401D, 401E). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
FILED: July 9, 2020

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 2486

(8:17

- cv

- 01596

- PJM)

In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his

official capacity and in his individual capacity,

Petitioner.

------------------------------------------------------------

PROFESSOR CLARK D. CUNNINGHAM; PROFESSOR JESSE EGBERT,

Amici Curiae,

SCHOLAR SETH BARRETT TILLMAN; JUDICIAL EDUCATION PROJECT,

Amici Supporting Petitioner,

FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS; COMMONWEALTH OF

VIRGINIA; THE NISKANEN CENTER; REPUBLICAN WOMEN FOR

PROGRESS; CHERI JACOBUS; TOM COLEMAN; EMIL H. FRANKEL; JOEL

SEARBY; ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AND

FEDERAL COURTS SCHOLARS; CE RTAIN LEGAL HISTORIANS,

Amici Supporting Respondents.

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

Upon consideration of submissions relative to the motion to extend the stay pending

further proceedings at the Supreme Court in any petition arising from No. 18

- 2486 , the

C ourt grants the motion.2 Entered at the direction of Judge Motz with the concurrences of Chief Judge

Gregory, Judges Wilkinson, Niemeyer, King, Agee, Keenan, Diaz, Floyd, Thacker, Harris,

Richardson, Quattlebaum, and Rushing. Judge Wynn voted to deny the motion.

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Co nnor, Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of Agriculture (USDA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of abolishment for USDA/FS-51 Electronic Corpsmember Information System (ELCID). 

# SUMMARY:

A review of this Privacy Act System of Records has concluded that this system is no longer in effect and obsolete. This system is being abolished from the Forest Service System of Records in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

This notice is effective on September 10, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

For additional information contact the Director of Recreation and Heritage Resources, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mailstop 1136, Washington, DC 20250-1136. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bob Gonzales,                         *telephone:*                         (303) 236-9914.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, requires that each agency publish a notice of the existence and character of each new or altered “system of records.” 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(5). This notice identifies and abolishes a Forest Service discontinued and obsolete system of records. The Forest Service is abolishing the following system of records which, upon review, is no longer used and is obsolete: USDA/FS-51 ELCID. The records have been transferred to the Federal Records Center and destroyed according to the Federal Records Disposal Act of 1943 (44 U.S.C. 366-380) and the Federal Records Act of 1950, and as designated in the Forest Service Records Management Handbook (FSH) 6209.11. 

Dated: August 27, 2008. 

Edward T. Schafer, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-21003 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                       547
<INVENTORY>                                     23,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,244
<PP&E>                                         125,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,160
<BONDS>                                         26,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,549
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,105
<SALES>                                        263,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,558
<CGS>                                          223,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13<F1>
<FN>
<F1>A Two-for-one stock split occurred on June 26, 1998. Prior Financial Data
Schedules (excluding the schedules for the quarters ended March 31, 1998 and
1997) have not been restated for the recapitalization.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,018
<INVENTORY>                                     18,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,184
<PP&E>                                         111,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,526
<BONDS>                                          9,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,549
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,932
<SALES>                                        228,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,816
<CGS>                                          197,240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,646
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 04-cr-166-01-SM

Alesandro Castro

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. Defendant admitted the violations but sought

renewal bail. The defendant while on bail has dropped out of

treatment, given one dirty urine, engaged in domestic abuse and

been deceptive with his Pretrial Services Officer. Given the

number of failed opportunities to comply with conditions I find

that the defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition or

combination of conditions. The conditions of release are

revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

Case 1:04-cr-00166-SM Document 24 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
2

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: July 29, 2005 

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

 Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:04-cr-00166-SM Document 24 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2