alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of abolishment of U.S. Department of Agriculture System of Records USDA/FS-05 Certified Cost Collectors record system. 

# SUMMARY:

The records formerly maintained in this Privacy Act System of Records, USDA/FS-05 Certified Cost Collectors are no longer maintained, and the System of Records is obsolete. Therefore, this system is being abolished and removed from the inventory of USDA System of Records in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

This notice is effective on September 11, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

For additional information contact the Director of Forest Management, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mailstop 1103, Washington, DC 20250-1103. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Director of Forest Management, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, telephone: (202) 205-0893; or e-mail to                         *wo_foia@fs.fed.us*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, requires that each agency publish a notice of the existence and character of each new or altered “system of records.” 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(5). This notice identifies and abolishes a U.S. Department of Agriculture discontinued and obsolete system of records, USDA/FS-05 Certified Cost Collectors. The records formerly maintained in this System of Records have been destroyed according to the Federal Records Disposal Act of 1943 (44 U.S.C. 366-380) and the Federal Records Act of 1950, and as designated in the Forest Service Records Management Handbook (FSH) 6209.11. 

Dated: August 29, 2008. 

Edward T. Schafer, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-21214 Filed 9-10-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro TREJO-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-41687.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 19, 2003.

. Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Pedro Trejo-Jimenez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for modification. Although Trejo-Jimenez cites to various Sentencing Guidelines provisions, he fails to identify any statute or rule that authorizes his motion for modification. Trejo-Jimenez has filed a meaningless, unauthorized motion, which the district court should have dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140,142 (5th Cir.1994). This court affirms the judgment on this alternative basis. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 2, 2018 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2018-2 (the
“Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery
of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection
therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 6, 2020
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                     
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                     
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) (4).

The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance scores to the Director, MDA.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 1, 2008                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandy Rawdon, MDA SES Program Manager, Missile Defense Agency, Arlington, VA, (703) 693-1575.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following executives are appointed to the MDA PRB:

Major General Patrick J. O'Reilly, USA, 

Mr. David Altwegg, 

Mr. Keith Englander, 

Ms. Patty Gargulinski, 

RADM Alan Hicks, USN.

Executives listed will serve a one-year term, effective September 1, 2008.

Dated: September 3, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E8-21098 Filed 9-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Beckwith Builders, Inc.,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 04-cv-282-SM

William Depietri; Beth Depietri;

Wood & Clay, Inc.;

Battle Associates, Inc.;

Margulies & Associates, Inc.;

and Lakeshore Realty Trust,

Defendants

O R D E R

The court’s recently issued order addressing a number of

issues raised in a comprehensive joint motion to dismiss has the

effect of largely mooting issues raised in a joint motion for

summary judgment (document no. 92). The only issue likely

surviving is that related to copyright ownership, and that is not

subject to disposition on summary judgment due to the likely

existence of a genuine dispute as to a material fact (whether, in

fact, the original copyright owner, Stokes, orally assigned his

rights in the Cedar Cove house plans to Beckwith Builders in

1999).

Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied.

Case 1:04-cv-00282-SM Document 164 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

September 19, 2006

cc: Paul M. Monzione, Esq.

V. Richards Ward, Jr., Esq.

William M. Pezzoni, Esq.

Ann M. Dirsa, Esq.

Michael J. Persson, Esq.

Douglas Marrano, Esq.

Jay S. Gregory, Esq.

Jeffrey L. Alitz, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00282-SM Document 164 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2
PAGE <1>

                                 Exhibit 99.1



                 Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: August 14, 2002                    J. BEN HATHAWAY
                                               ---------------
                                               J. Ben Hathaway

































PAGE <1>

                                 Exhibit 99.2


                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




     Date: August 14, 2002                      LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Alexander Parks

v. Case No. 04-cv-445-PB

Carol A. Tatarinowicz and

Lucille C. Fitzsimmons, et al.

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 49, Defendant Fitzsimmons’ Motion

for Summary Judgment

Ruling: Accepting as true, the undersigned facts proffered by

the defendant in support of her motion, I determine that she is

entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Motion granted. 

Entered by: Paul Barbadoro, District Judge

Date: June 24, 2005

cc: William Alexander Parks, pro se

Karla J. Black, Esq.

Donald Gardner, Esq.

Lawrence Gormley, Esq.

Daniel J. Mullen, Esq.

Kenneth D. Murphy, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00445-PB Document 70 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-126-01-SM

Douglas Abernathy

O R D E R

Before the court is defendant’s Motion for Bail Hearing. As

recently as April 8, 2010, the defendant appeared before this

court (Muirhead, J.) for a bail hearing. After hearing proffers

from both the government and the defendant, Judge Muirhead

ordered the defendant be detained until his revocation hearing. 

This judge listened to the recording of the April 8, 2010,

hearing, and reviewed the instant motion and the government’s

objection thereto. I find no basis on which to grant the

defendant a further bail hearing. Document No. 45 is denied.

____________________________________

Landya B. McCafferty

United States Magistrate Judge

June 14, 2010

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Alfred J.T. Rubega, Esq.

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00126-SM Document 47 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the Companies) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Stephen A.
McKeon, the Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 14, 2003

| |                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Stephen A. McKeon                                    
| |                                                          
| | Stephen A. McKeon                                        
| | Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,418,299
<SECURITIES>                                   314,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                  611,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    109,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,592,758
<PP&E>                                         3,753,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,000,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,357,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,877,878
<BONDS>                                        1,426,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18,257
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,461,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,357,331
<SALES>                                        841,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,943,988
<CGS>                                          529,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,332,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,316,430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   131,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            99,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   99,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.06



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.37

                      NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
                           EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 2005

ANNUAL RETAINER AND MEETING FEES

Each non-management director will be paid an annual retainer fee of $40,000, a
$1,500 meeting fee for each regularly scheduled Board and committee meeting, and
a $2,500 meeting fee for attendance in person at each committee meeting not held
in conjunction with regularly scheduled Board meetings. Committee chairpersons
will receive an additional $1,000 above the committee meeting fee for each
meeting. All such fees will be paid in cash quarterly unless deferred under the
Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors and in accordance with the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

RESTRICTED STOCK

The Company adopted, with stockholder approval, the Amendment and Restatement of
the Equity Incentive Plan under which, among other provisions, each
non-management director is entitled to receive a grant of stock options,
restricted stock and/or stock appreciation rights, as determined by the Board of
Directors. In February 2005, the Board approved an award of restricted stock to
each non-management director with a value of approximately $100,000 upon
election to the Board and, after completing one year of service, an additional
award of restricted stock with a value of approximately $100,000 on the business
day immediately following each annual stockholders' meeting. The value of each
share of restricted stock is the fair market value of a share of common stock on
the date the award is granted. The restricted stock will vest and all
restrictions terminate upon termination of directorship for any reason other
than cause.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1999
[CASH]                                         206,682
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  109,662
[ALLOWANCES]                                     4,000
[INVENTORY]                                     38,371
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               481,954
[PP&E]                                      15,513,835
[DEPRECIATION]                              13,702,871
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               2,292,918
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          232,616
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                     1,071,610
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 2,292,918
[SALES]                                        213,349
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               223,490
[CGS]                                          238,239
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  312,926
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                   786
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               1,534
[INCOME-PRETAX]                               (91,756)
[INCOME-TAX]                                       325
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                           (92,081)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                  (92,081)
[EPS-BASIC]                                    (.04)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.04)
</TABLE>
#### BATON ROUGE SASH & DOOR WORKS, Inc., v. SPEDALE et al.

No. 2157.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1940.

J. Oliver Bouanchaud, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Johnson & Kantrow, of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

LE BLANC, Judge.

This is the companion suit referred to in the opinion this day handed down in the case of *Levingston*Supply Company, Inc., v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, 198 So. 416. In this case, however, plaintiff is suing the principal contractor, Louis A. Spedale, as well as the surety on his bond, American Employers’ Insurance Company. Besides, plaintiff has coupled with its demand against the defendants on the Thomas O. Woods contract, certain amounts claimed for supplies furnished by it on two other jobs Spedale had contracted for with different owners and both of which contracts were bonded by the same surety company, defendant herein. We are not concerned on this appeal with these additional demands as the appeal was taken only by the defendant surety company from the judgment condemning the defendant to pay the amount claimed on the Thomas O. Woods contract. The demand for 10 per cent, attorney’s fees in addition to the amount of the claim is only made against the defendant surety company.

For the same reasons assigned in the opinion in the case of Levingston Supply Company, Inc. v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, supra, to the effect that under Section 14 of Act 298 of 1926 any claimant holding a lien under that act has a separate and independent right of action, notwithstanding any of the other provisions of the act, aga’inst the surety or the principal contractor, and will not be forced into a concursus, and for the further reason therein pointed out why such claimant has a further right to bring a separate and independent suit against the surety on the principal contractor’s bond, we hold that in this case also the plea of prematurity was properly overruled and judgment rendered on the merits of the case in favor of the plaintiff.

For the reasons stated, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from to the extent that it condemned the defendant, Louis A. Spedale, to pay unto plaintiff the amount *421of its claim in the sum of $686.95 for supplies furnished on the Thomas O. Woods contract, plus the sum of $1 for recording fee, be affirmed, and that to the extent also that it condemned the defendant surety company, in solido, for the same amount and the additional sum of 10 per cent, as attorney’s fees it be, and is hereby, also affirmed. Appellant to pay all costs.