alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Calendar No. 92

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the

United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of theUnited States.

JULY 18, 2001

Read the first time

JULY 19, 2001

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

IIB

Calendar No. 92

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 18, 2001

Received and read the first time

JULY 19, 2001

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical

desecration of the flag of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein),
2

HJ 36 PCS

1 SECTION 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

2 The following article is proposed as an amendment

3 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be

4 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu5 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of

6 the several States within seven years after the date of its

7 submission for ratification:

8 ‘‘ARTICLE—

9 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys10 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
H. R. 6899 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from engaging in transactions involving 

the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued by the International Monetary 

Fund that are held by the Russian Federation or Belarus. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Russia and Belarus SDR 

Exchange Prohibition Act of 2022’’. 

SEC. 2. SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS EXCHANGE PROHIBITION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury may not engage 

in any transaction involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights 

issued by the International Monetary Fund that are held by the 

Russian Federation or Belarus. 

(b) ADVOCACY.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall— 

(1) vigorously advocate that the governments of the member 

countries of the International Monetary Fund, to the extent 

that the member countries issue freely usable currencies, prohibit transactions involving the exchange of Special Drawing 

Rights held by the Russian Federation or Belarus and 

(2) direct the United States Executive Director at each 

international financial institution (as defined in section 

1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) to 

use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose the 

provision of financial assistance to the Russian Federation and 

Belarus, except to address basic human needs of the civilian 

population. 

(c) TERMINATION.—The preceding provisions of this section shall 

have no force or effect on the earlier of— 

(1) the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment 

of this Act; or 

(2) 30 days after the date that the President reports to 

the Congress that the governments of the Russian Federation 

and Belarus have ceased destabilizing activities with respect 

to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. 

(d) WAIVER.—The President may waive the application of this 

section if the President reports to the Congress that the waiver 
H. R. 6899—2 

is in the national interest of the United States and includes an 

explanation of the reasons therefor. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-135-01-PB

Arjusz Roszkowski

O R D E R

The government has moved to continue the October 4, 2005

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

allow the court to conduct a hearing and rule on two motions to

suppress filed by defendant and to allow the government to

provide further discovery requested by the defendant. The

defendant objects to a continuance of the trial date. 

In order to allow the court sufficient time to rule on

pending motions and for the parties to complete discovery and

properly prepare for trial, the trial shall be continued from

October 4, 2005 to November 1, 2005. In agreeing to continue the

trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A)

that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in 

Case 1:05-cr-00135-SM Document 25 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2
2

granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 29, 2005

cc: Mark Howard, AUSA

Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00135-SM Document 25 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Brigido OLGUIN-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 01-71206, 02-72341. Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 2003.*

Decided Aug. 12, 2003.

Before NOONAN, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The Board of Immigration Appeals may summarily dismiss an appeal if “[t]he party ... indicates on Form EOIR-26 ... that he or she will file a brief or statement *758in support of the appeal and, thereafter, does not file such brief or statement, or reasonably explain his or her failure to do so...8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(E).

Olguin-Hernandez promised, yet failed, to file a timely written brief. The BIA nevertheless examined Hernandez’ notice of appeal to ascertain whether the form adequately specified the factual and legal basis for the appeal. It did not. Thus, “the Board was left guessing at how and why petitioner thought the court had erred,” *Toquero v. INS,*956 F.2d 193, 195 (9th Cir.1992) (citation omitted), and summary dismissal of Hernandez’ appeal was appropriate. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*No. 02-35788, 2003 WL 21739501, *4 (9th Cir. July 29, 2003).

Hernandez also filed a motion to reopen his removal proceedings, arguing that the subsequent birth of his two United States citizen children made him newly eligible for cancellation of removal. Relying upon *Matter of Andazola,*23 I & N Dec. 319 (BIA 2002) and *Matter of Monreal,*23 I & N Dec. 56 (BIA 2001), the BIA denied Hernandez’ motion to reopen.

We review the BIA’s denial of Hernandez’ motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion. *Guzman v. INS,*318 F.3d 911, 912 n. 1 (9th Cir.2003). Given that both *Andazola*and *Monreal*are factually indistinguishable from this case, the BIA’s reliance on the two cases was not an abuse of discretion.

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *758courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW FAUST, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00244-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 3

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1151500)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until April 23, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Charles M. Mallin, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 23, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 173 (Friday, September 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20753]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


September 15, 2008 Public Hearing

    Time and Date: 2 p.m., Monday, September 15, 2008.
    Place: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 
New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Status: Hearing open to the Public at 2 p.m.
    Purpose: Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's 
Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present 
views regarding the activities of the Corporation.
    Procedures: Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must 
provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 
p.m. Thursday, September 11, 2008. The notice must include the 
individual's name, title, organization, address, and telephone number, 
and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented.
    Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for 
individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, 
to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request to 
participate an opportunity to be heard.
    Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record 
must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no 
later than 5 p.m. Thursday, September 11, 2008. Such statements must be 
typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.
    Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda 
for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on 
which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for each 
presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.
    A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary 
will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate 
Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.
    Contact Person for Information: Information on the hearing may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 
218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#682b070606010d462c071f061b280718010b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="094a666767606c274d667e677a496679606a276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 3, 2008.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20753 Filed 9-3-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Matysek, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary of Quincy Energy Corp. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

1.      The Annual Report on Form
10-KSB, of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2.      The information contained in
this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 25, 2006



/s/ Paul Matysek Paul Matysek Chief Executive
Officer

---
Case 1:05-cv-00242-SM Document 48 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2Case 1:05-cv-00242-SM Document 48 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1095 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1095

 To clarify the tax treatment of payments made under the Cerro Grande 
                          Fire Assistance Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2001

   Mr. Udall of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the tax treatment of payments made under the Cerro Grande 
                          Fire Assistance Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR PAYMENTS UNDER CERRO GRANDE 
              FIRE ASSISTANCE ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 104(d) of the Cerro Grande Fire Assistance 
Act (Public Law 106-246; 114 Stat. 585) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Payments excluded from gross income.--
                    ``(A) In general.--For purposes of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986, gross income shall not include 
                any amount of any payment under this title not 
                otherwise excludable from gross income under such Code.
                    ``(B) Denial of double benefit.--Subparagraph (A) 
                shall not apply to any amount if under such Code--
                            ``(i) a deduction or credit is allowed with 
                        respect to such amount, or
                            ``(ii) an increase in the adjusted basis of 
                        any property results from such amount.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Cerro Grande Fire 
Assistance Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Real Estate Referral Center Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Lisa McIntosh, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 29th day of May, 2007.



| | LISA McINTOSH                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Lisa McIntosh                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 78 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.78

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-44 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``December 21, 2001''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     June 19, 2000
                                                ------------------------


                                 Citigroup Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Delaware                       1-9924             52-1568099
         ---------------             ------------          -------------------
         (State or other             (Commission           (IRS Employer
         jurisdiction of             File Number)          Identification No.)
         incorporation)

                 153 East 53rd Street, New York, New York     10043
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

                                 (212) 559-1000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


<PAGE>

                                 CITIGROUP INC.
                           Current Report on Form 8-K

Item 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.
         -------------------------------------------------------------------

         Exhibits:

         Exhibit No.       Description
         -----------       -----------

         1.01              Distribution Agreement, dated June 19, 2000, between
                           the Company and Salomon Smith Barney Inc., relating
                           to the offer and sale of the Company's Medium-Term
                           Senior Notes, Series C, Due Nine Months or More from
                           Date of Issue and Medium-Term Subordinated Notes,
                           Series C, Due Nine Months or More from Date of Issue.


                                       2


<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE


                  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.




Dated:  June 19, 2000               CITIGROUP INC.



                                    By /s/ Firoz B. Tarapore
                                      ----------------------
                                      Firoz B. Tarapore
                                      Deputy Treasurer


                                       3
#### Lois R. HALL, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 02-2090.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Aug. 10, 2003.

Lois R. Hall on brief pro se.

Gina Y. Walcott-Torres, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.

*79Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, LYNCH and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we allow the appellees’ motion for summary disposition. We affirm the lower court’s dismissal on the ground that plaintiffs/appellants failed to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement that they first submit their claim to the appropriate agency in writing. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); *Gonzalez v. United States,*284 F.3d 281, 288 (1st Cir.2002)

(“Pursuant to the FTCA, a tort claim against the United States is ‘forever barred’ unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate federal agency within two years after the claim accrues.”) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b)).

*Affirmed. See*1st Cir. Loe. R. 27(c).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy Duquette

v. Civil No. 04-cv-281-SM

Les Dolecal, Commissioner, et al.

O R D E R

 Plaintiff moves to compel discovery as to specifically

identified requests for production and interrogatories. They are

considered in order. 

Request nos. 1 & 2 - certified copy of each version of the

Sex Offender Program curriculum over the last ten years,

including any “alternative” SOP. 

Defendants have produced the current curriculum and the

prior version was introduced into evidence at the preliminary

injunction hearing. In the defendants’ objection to the motion

defendants state that they do not have copies of any other

version of the curriculum used during the last ten years. A

party is not required to create a document in response to a

request nor can a party be ordered to produce that which it does

not have. Defendants have otherwise complied. Denied. 

Request nos. 5 & 6 - Department of Corrections budgets for

the SOP for the last ten years, specifying state and federal

money. 

Defendants have admitted that the SOP is a state-sponsored,

Case 1:04-cv-00281-SM Document 63 Filed 06/23/05 Page 1 of 3
2

state-funded program and that admission satisfies that element of

plaintiff’s cause of action. The requests are unnecessary and

over broad. Denied. 

Request no. 7 - form notices where SOP participants were

notified or given the option for an alternative SOP prior to

March 28, 2005. 

Defendants are ordered to provide all such copies for the

period prior to March 28, 2005 with names redacted. Defense

counsel shall collect copies of the unredacted ones for in camera

review if necessary. If there are no such documents prior to

March 28, 2005, defense counsel is to provide plaintiff with a

written admission to that effect. Granted in part. 

Request no. 8 - current SOP curriculum. 

This is covered by request no. 1. 

Interrogatory no. 4 - Is SOP funded by state or federal

money.

Defendants are ordered to answer. Granted. 

Interrogatory no. 5 - how long have defendants been aware

that state sponsored religious, 12-step and/or higher power

programs are unconstitutional? 

Defendants are ordered to answer as it bears on the question

of willfulness of any violation. Granted. 

Case 1:04-cv-00281-SM Document 63 Filed 06/23/05 Page 2 of 3
3

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 23, 2005

cc: Randy J. Duquette

 Mary E. Maloney, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00281-SM Document 63 Filed 06/23/05 Page 3 of 3