alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Fedearl Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases  Special Emphasis Panel; Rejuvenating the Aged Immune System.                     

*Date:*                         October 2-3, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Crown Plaza—Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Barney Duane Price, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program,  DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DEA Room 3139,  6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616,  Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-2550,                         *pricebd@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Disease Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 2, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-20836 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Alex Steinberg et al., Respondents, v James E. Williams II, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant James Edward Williams II appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated June 30, 1988, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to strike his answer and for summary judgment in their favor.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the appellant’s contention that the court erred in striking his second affirmative defense, which alleged that the provision in the mortgage calling for negative amortization was void. While "[i]t is true that the compounding of interest is not, by itself, usurious” *(Giventer v Arnow,*37 NY2d 305, 308), it is also true that "agreements to pay compound interest have not found favor with the courts” *(Giventer v Arnow, supra,*at 308). However, this general rule is not applicable to this action. This "was not a case where the parties simply agreed in advance to compound interest upon default” *(Giventer v Arnow, supra,*at 309).

As in the case of *Matter of Jackson*(120 AD2d 309), the debtor could forego paying full simple interest, with the proviso that any unpaid interest would be added to the principal. Thus, "the agreement to compound the interest was simply a computation device for increasing the interest due upon maturity” *(Giventer v Arnow, supra,*at 309). Since usury proscriptions generally are not applicable to purchase-money mortgages *(see, Mandelino v Fribourg,*23 NY2d 145), the agreement is fully enforceable.

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 95

Designating an official flag of the Medal of Honor and providing for

presentation of that flag to each recipient of that Medal of Honor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2002

Mr. LATHAM introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Armed Services

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating an official flag of the Medal of Honor and

providing for presentation of that flag to each recipient

of that Medal of Honor.

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest award for valor

in action against an enemy force which can be bestowed

upon an individual serving in the Armed Forces of the

United States;

Whereas the Medal of Honor was established by Congress

during the Civil War to recognize soldiers who had distinguished themselves by gallantry in action;

Whereas the Medal of Honor was conceived by Senator

James Grimes of the State of Iowa in 1861; and

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the Nation’s highest military

honor, awarded for acts of personal bravery or self-sac-
2

•HJ 95 IH

rifice above and beyond the call of duty: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MEDAL OF HONOR FLAG.

4 The flag designed in 2002 by a resident of Jefferson,

5 Iowa, and intended to be used to honor recipients of the

6 Medal of Honor is hereby recognized and designated as

7 the Medal of Honor Flag.

8 SEC. 2. PRESENTATION OF FLAG TO MEDAL OF HONOR RE9 CIPIENTS.

10 (a) PRESENTATION.—The President shall provide for

11 the presentation of the Medal of Honor Flag to each re12 cipient of the Medal of Honor.

13 (b) FUTURE RECIPIENTS.—With respect to any pres14 entation of the Medal of Honor made after the date of

15 the enactment of this resolution, the presentation of the

16 flag pursuant to subsection (a) shall be made at the same

17 time as the presentation of the medal.

18 (c) PRIOR RECIPIENTS.—With respect to any living

19 recipient of the Medal of Honor, presentation of the flag

20 pursuant to subsection (a) shall be made as expeditiously

21 as possible after the date of the enactment of this resolu22 tion in such manner as may be provided by the Secretary

23 of Defense.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

JOSE MELCHOR BENITEZ 

HERNANDEZ, and YESSICA PAULINA 

BENITEZ CABRERA,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

LOREN K. MILLER, Director, Nebraska 

Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and 

Immigration Services, in his official 

capacity as well as his successors and 

assigns,; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, 

Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland 

Security, in his official capacity as well as 

his successors and assigns; UR 

MENDOZA JADDOU, Director, U.S. 

Citizenship and Immigration Services, in 

her official capacity as well as her 

successor and assigns; ANTONY J. 

BLINKEN, Secretary of State, U.S. 

Department of State, in his official 

capacity as well as his successors and 

assigns; PHILLIP SLATTERY, Director, 

National Visa Center, U.S. Department of 

State, in his official capacity as well as his 

successors and assigns; and RICHARD 

C. VISEK, Acting Legal Adviser, U.S. 

Department of State, in his official 

capacity as well as his successors and 

assigns;

Defendants.

4:23CV3084

ORDER

The above-captioned action was randomly assigned to the undersigned 

magistrate judge for final disposition, and a motion to dismiss has now been filed. 

Unless all parties consent to final disposition by a magistrate judge, the 

undersigned cannot enter a ruling on the pending motion. If the parties do not so 

consent, the case will be reassigned to a district judge.

4:23-cv-03084-CRZ Doc # 19 Filed: 07/13/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 126
Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that to avoid any delays in this case, 

1) If the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the 

undersigned magistrate judge, on or before August 10, 2023, they 

shall complete the “CONSENT TO RANDOM ASSIGNMENT TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE” located on the court’s website at 

http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. After all parties have signed this 

form, e-mail it in .pdf format to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not 

electronically file this form or submit it to chambers.

2) In the absence of timely submitting the fully executed consent form in 

accordance with paragraph (1) of this order, the case will be 

reassigned to a district judge.

Dated this 13th day of July, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Cheryl R. Zwart

United States Magistrate Judge

4:23-cv-03084-CRZ Doc # 19 Filed: 07/13/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 127
<PAGE>
 
                                                            Exhibit 11.2


                             PITT-DES MOINES, INC.

                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                    Six months ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                              ----------------------------
                                                                    1997           1996
                                                              ----------------  ----------
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>
Primary
    Average shares outstanding                                       3,489,309   3,484,296
    Dilutive stock options based on treasury stock
       method using average market price                                43,112      43,572
                                                                    ----------  ----------
                                                                     3,532,421   3,527,868
                                                                    ==========  ==========
    Net income                                                      $5,671,228  $6,599,842
                                                                    ==========  ==========
    Per common share:
       Net income per common share                                  $     1.61  $     1.87
                                                                    ==========  ==========
 
Fully Diluted
    Average shares outstanding                                       3,489,309   3,484,296
    Dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method
       using greater of period-end or average market price              56,306      47,692
                                                                    ----------  ----------
                                                                     3,545,615   3,531,988
                                                                    ==========  ==========
 
    Net income                                                      $5,671,228  $6,599,842
                                                                    ==========  ==========
    Per common share:
       Net income per common share                                  $     1.60  $     1.87
                                                                    ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018(the “Report”) of SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 /s/ Richard L. Peteka**Name:** Richard L. Peteka**Date:** February 21, 2019**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 15, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference call. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Janice Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA, 98174. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Janice Spinks. Miss Spinks can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

                    The agenda will include the following:                     *Various IRS issues*.                 

Dated: August 29, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-20956 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
National Presto Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.


Date:  August 11, 2003                         /S/ R. F. Lieble
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               R. F. Lieble,
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.4


 


SECURED
TERM PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$900,000	                       Advance Date:         August 13, 2019
	 	                        Maturity Date:  September 30, 2020


  


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
Ondas Holdings Inc., a Nevada corporation, for itself and each of its Subsidiaries (the “Borrower”) hereby promises
to pay to the order of Energy Capital, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, or the holder of this Note (the “Lender”)
at Lender’s address listed in Loan Agreement, or such other place of payment as the holder of this Secured Term Promissory Note
(this “Promissory Note”) may specify from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America,
the principal amount of Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($900,000) or such lesser principal amount as Lender has advanced to Borrower,
together with interest as set forth in that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated October 1, 2018, by and among Borrower, its
Domestic Subsidiaries party thereto and Lender (as the same may from time to time be amended, modified or supplemented in accordance
with its terms, the “Loan Agreement”).


 


This Promissory Note
is the Term Note referred to in, and is executed and delivered in connection with, the Loan Agreement, and is entitled to the benefit
and security of the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents (as defined in the Loan Agreement), to which reference is made
for a statement of all of the terms and conditions thereof. All payments shall be made in accordance with the Loan Agreement. All
terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same definitions when used herein, unless otherwise defined herein. An Event
of Default under the Loan Agreement shall constitute an Event of Default under this Promissory Note.


 


Borrower waives presentment
and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest under the UCC or any applicable law. Borrower agrees
to make all payments under this Promissory Note without setoff, recoupment or deduction and regardless of any counterclaim or defense.
This Promissory Note has been negotiated and delivered to Lender and is payable in the State of Florida. This Promissory Note shall
be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, excluding any conflicts of law
rules or principles that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.


 


BORROWER FOR ITSELF AND ON BEHALF OF ITS
SUBSIDIARIES:


 


	 	ONDAS HOLDINGS INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Eric A. Brock
	 	 	Eric A. Brock, Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. KENNEDY & DENNY CO., Inc., v. GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO.

No. 5832.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 7, 1938.

Dickson & Denny, of Shreveport, for petitioner.

J. N. Marcantel, of Shreveport, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Writs refused for the reason that this Court is without supervisory jurisdiction except in aid of our appellate jurisdiction. State ex rel. Griffin v. Morgan, 19 La.App. 709, 130 So. 868; Putnam & Norman v. Levee, 179 La. 180, 153 So. 685; Constitution of 1921, Article 7, §§ 2, 29.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-570-827)


Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China: Notice 
of Correction of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Montoro at (202) 482-0238 or 
Shane Subler at (202) 482-0189; AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 25, 2008, the Department published a notice of extension 
of the time limit for the preliminary results of the antidumping duty 
review on certain cased pencils from the People's Republic of China. 
See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China: 
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 49993 (August 25, 2008) (Extension 
Notice). We identified an error in the published version of the notice. 
Specifically, in the Extension Notice, the case number was incorrectly 
listed as C-570-827. The correct case number is A-570-827. This notice 
serves to correct the case number listed in the Extension Notice.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 2, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-20749 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
First Amendment to the
Surgery Partners, Inc.
2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan


This Amendment to the Surgery Partners, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by Surgery Partners, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of May 29, 2019. 


WHEREAS, the Company has established the Plan through which the Company may grant awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to directors, officers and other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as other persons performing consulting or advisory services for the Company; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the total number of shares that may be granted pursuant to the Plan by 3,500,000 shares, resulting in a total of 8,315,700 shares that may be granted under the Plan. 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of Section 4(a) in its entirety and inserting the following in its place and stead: 


“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 7, the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan is 8,315,700 shares.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed by the undersigned officer of the Company, to be effective as of the date first written above. 


Surgery Partners, Inc.
     


By:       /s/ Jennifer Baldock            
Name:      Jennifer Baldock                
		
	Title: 
	 EVP & Chief Legal Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

LORI PERROTTI -JOHNS

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1 :05-cv-243-

W AL-MART STORES, INC. and JOHN

DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE

Defendants.

STIPULA TION OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(I), the parties stipulate to dismiss the above-captioned

matter with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted

LORI PERROTTI -JOHNS W AL-MART STORES, INC.

By Her Attorneys

Burns, Bryant, Cox, Rockefeller

& Durkin, P.

By Its Attorneys

Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, P.

:~s/ John E. Durkin

John E. Durkin

, #

255 Washington Street

O. Box 608

Dover, NH 

(603) 742-2332

By:~s/ David W. McGrath

David W. McGrath, #9347

1000 Elm Street, P. O. Box 3701

Manchester, NH 03105-3701

(603) 627-8255

Dated: February 15 , 2008

Case 1:05-cv-00243-PB Document 53 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 1