alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, September 26, 2008.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Staff Assistant.

[FR Doc. E8-21109 Filed 9-8-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3

                                 PSEG POWER LLC
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  For the Nine
                                                  Months Ended           For the Years Ended
                                                 September 30,               December 31,
                                                 -----------------------------------------------------
                                                  2004    2003    2003    2002    2001    2000    1999
                                                 -----------------------------------------------------
                                                               (Millions,except ratios)
<S>                                              <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations        $ 490   $ 670   $ 800   $ 781   $ 644   $ 521   $ 807
Fixed Charges                                      194     172     225     219     213     209     126
Capitalized Interest                               (86)    (89)   (109)    (95)    (63)    (11)     (2)
Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements               --      --      --      --      --      --     (12)
                                                 -----------------------------------------------------
Total Earnings                                   $ 598   $ 753   $ 916   $ 905   $ 794   $ 719   $ 919
                                                 =====================================================

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B)

Interest Expense                                 $ 194   $ 171   $ 223   $ 217   $ 206   $ 209   $ 114
Interest Factor in Rentals                          --       1       2       2       7      --      --
Preferred Securities Dividends Requirements of
   Subsidiaries                                     --      --      --      --      --      --      12
                                                 -----------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges                              $ 194   $ 172   $ 225   $ 219   $ 213   $ 209   $ 126
                                                 =====================================================
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                3.08    4.38    4.07    4.13    3.73    3.44    7.29
                                                 =====================================================
</TABLE>

(A)  The term "earnings" shall be defined as pre-tax income from continuing
     operations. Add to pre-tax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to
     exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
     amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals.
exv10w7xay



 







EXHIBIT 10.7a




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO



CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, William A. Houlihan (“Executive”) and Metris Companies Inc. (“Company”)
(collectively, the “Parties”) entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement dated October
21, 2004 (“Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, Section 10.6 of the Agreement provides that such Agreement may be amended by written
instrument executed by the Company and the Executive; and



WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects;




     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that Sections 9.3(a), (b) and (c) of the Agreement are
amended effective March 10, 2005, to substitute the words “one year” for the words “two years”
where the latter appear therein.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed this Agreement this
10th day of March, 2005.



	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 	METRIS COMPANIES INC.
	 
	 	 
	/s/William A. Houlihan

	 	/s/David D. Wesselink
	WILLIAM A. HOULIHAN

	 	DAVID D. WESSELINK
	

	 	Chairman and CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 116 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 116

To recognize the rights of consumers to use copyright protected works, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2002

 Mr. Cox introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To recognize the rights of consumers to use copyright protected works, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Joint Resolution may be referred to as the ``Consumer 
Technology Bill of Rights''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF RIGHTS.

    It is the sense of Congress that, with respect to all electronic 
media in United States commerce, consumers who legally acquire 
copyrighted and non-copyrighted works should be free to use these works 
in non-commercial ways. The enumeration of rights in section 3, which 
shall be known as the Consumer Technology Bill of Rights, sets forth 
the rights of all Americans to personal control of information and 
entertainment content they have lawfully acquired and from which they 
do not intend to profit.

SEC. 3. ENUMERATION OF RIGHTS.

    The following are the rights of consumers in legally acquired 
copyrighted and non-copyrighted works:
            (1) Users have the right to record legally acquired video 
        or audio for later viewing or listening (popularly referred to 
        as ``time-shifting'').
             (2) Users have the right to use legally acquired content 
        in different places (popularly referred to as ``space-
        shifting'').
            (3) Users have the right to archive or make backup copies 
        of their content for use in the event that the original copies 
        are destroyed.
            (4) Users have the right to use legally acquired content on 
        the electronic platform or device of their choice.
            (5) Users have the right to translate legally acquired 
        content into comparable formats.
            (6) Users have the right to use technology in order to 
        achieve the rights enumerated in paragraphs (1) through (5).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens  Communications Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Tow,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ Leonard Tow
-------------------------
Leonard Tow
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2003




This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Citizens  Communications  Company and will be retained by Citizens
Communications  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  January 9, 2012





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





o    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))





Item 8.01
Other Events




The information set forth in the press release issued by Frontier Communications Corporation on January 9, 2012, announcing plans to release the Company’s fourth quarter 2011 results, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, is incorporated herein by reference.




Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)           Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on January 9, 2012 announcing plans to release the Company’s fourth quarter 2011 results.

















SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  January 10, 2012
By:/s/ Susana D’EmicSusana D’EmicSenior Vice President andController
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0628; Airspace Docket No. 07-ASW-15]
RIN 2120-AA66


Revision of Restricted Area 5107A; White Sands Missile Range, NM

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action delays the effective date for the revision of 
Restricted Area R-5107A, and the establishment of R-5107K, White Sands 
Missile Range, NM, until November 20, 2008. The FAA is taking this 
action to meet the required charting cutoff date necessary to insure 
the appropriate en route aeronautical charts display these restricted 
areas coincidental with the effective date.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, November 20, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Neubecker, Airspace and Rules 
Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    On August 20, 2008, the FAA published in the Federal Register a 
final rule revising restricted area R-5107A, and establishing R-5107K, 
White Sands Missile Range, NM (73 FR 49090). This rule was originally 
scheduled to become effective September 25, 2008; however, the charting 
cutoff date required to be met to ensure charting coincidental with 
that effective date was missed. To meet the required charting cutoff 
date, and ensure restricted areas R-5107A and R-5107K are displayed on 
the appropriate en route charts coincidental with their effective date, 
the effective date is being slipped to November 20, 2008.

Delay of Effective Date

    The effective date of the final rule, Docket FAA-2008-0627; 
Airspace Docket 07-ASW-15, as published in the Federal Register on 
August 20, 2008 (73 FR 49090), is hereby delayed until November 20, 
2008.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2, 2008.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8-21182 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### In the Matter of Steven W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order of disposition of the Family Court, Bronx County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on April 13, 1989, which adjudged Steven W. a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for 18 months, based upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 2, 1989 finding that Steven W. committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of second degree robbery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon reviewing the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing, which took place over the course of several months, we conclude sufficient evidence exists to support a finding of second degree robbery. The complaint unhesitatingly identified Steven W., a fellow student at the same public school he was attending and with whom he had spoken on several occasions prior to the incident, as being one of the perpetrators. According to complainant, defendant punched him in the eye before at least two cohorts joined in to steal his coat. The complainant then saw the threesome flee with his coat.

The robbery took place during daylight time while complainant was walking home from school. Although Steven W. claimed to be a mere spectator to the incident, the trier of fact, who is in the best position to observe the demeanor of the witnesses and assess their ability to tell the truth, chose to credit the complainant’s testimony, and no basis exists to disturb the court’s findings of fact. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 



### Eononbl* sehn D* mod, Uorrlrdoaer **Eureaa ot**  **Labor** 

### Sathtlor **AwU8,** 

### TOPD

de to our orrio. r8ain aoatnot ro0r **tbelt Dy**  **br**



### “84ohMnaraatur~, **-tile,** **airI*,** q a u r y ifi &

nil r md l

troot lnll W~Y,

o ff a a l,

o il , &aubeat,, t e l e(me & , t e 1 o~o n a

t q d orpr e~o

OO R p a n y, rrp l o y a

o n e orm a r e

p em o n~,

a n d 

### oaoh **an6 every**  

### ratir **wmpeay** 

### n6t **o&wated br**  **a SW&&O&-**  **pal Oorgoratfon,**  **aad aaah**  **-4** 

## w&-y **wb8a-t Oommfw,** a ad l ror y o t he r

aorporatian en g aged in an y

b ud aeda 

### dthln WA3 State, or any person, tia 

### or **ooorpontlon eagagod**  

### In or upon any mbllo work

_ Sor 

### tha Ststo or for uiy oouuty or 8nj muniolpil a orpo ntl o n t he r e o f,e it he r l 6 a 

### aontxaotor or a 

### l tkokltn o o r ,

t he r ew it h,

l 

### 8ll jmy uoh or it8 

### uployeo~ the wegeo oarnodby bin or her aa 

### ottm l

### * l m b a i o n8 h l y, o n 6 my t o l d a y 

### not W O 8 hu l 

### rlr8oon (1.6)

days prior to 

### the dey oi 

### ~1un6o4 Aot81933,

43rdLag.,

D*

You havegiwuf

me t&ofurther 

### lfUorfm8ion tint 

### Gray Oleuter8

SD a oleudag a& promlng e8tdMahuaatand 

### la not a 0eiporatlon. 

### It 

### is oar opiaion t&at 

### Art1010U55, won, door ngt~.p~to4ttny 

### ClunenaabtPII youhar*no jurl8dlaUon 3iaoo you bra M jurldiotioo ia 

### the mttor 

### we do 

### not expieu any opinleft dth retoronao te 

### tlm ooatraeta 

### lnvolwd. Vary tnly 

### yoara ATTolutKY

o- OF l%xAs
Exhibit 15







The Board of Directors
Polaroid Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:  Registration statements No. 33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on Form S-3,
     No.33-51173 on Form S-8, No. 333-0791 on Form S-3, No. 333-32279 on Form
     S-8, No. 333-32281 on Form S-8, No. 333-32283 on Form S-8, and No.
     333-32285 on Form S-8 of Polaroid Corporation.

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated April 8, 1998, related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                         Very truly yours,


                                                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
May 7, 1998
# United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Argued December 12, 2006 Decided May 29, 2007 No. 05-1382 C ANADIAN A SSOCIATION OF P ETROLEUM P RODUCERS , P ETITIONER

v. F EDERAL E NERGY REGULATORY C OMMISSION , RESPONDENT

On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

James H. Holt argued the cause for petitioner Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. With him on the briefs was Jill M. Barker

. Lona T. Perry , Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were R. Hewitt Pate , Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, John J. Powers, III, and Robert J. Wiggers , Attorneys, John S. Moot , General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Robert H. Solomon , Solicitor. Robert B. Nicholson , Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, entered an appearance. Before: S ENTELLE , G RIFFITHand KAVANAUGH , Circuit Judges

.2 Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM
. P ER CURIAM : The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (“CAPP”) has petitioned for review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Policy Statement on Income Tax Allowances. Policy Statement on Income Tax Allowances , 111 FERC ¶ 61,139 (2005). Petitioners assert that the Policy Statement is arbitrary and capricious and contrary to our decision in BP West Coast Products, LLC v. FERC , 374 F.3d 1263 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Petitioners have brought a faci al challenge to the Policy Statement. They do not seek review of FERC’s income tax allowance policy as applied to any individual pipeline’s rates. The Commission argues that the petition should be dismissed on either standing or ripeness grounds. Since the Policy Statement does not grant an income tax allo wance to any specific pipeline, the Commission argues that petitioners have not suffered Article III injury-in-fact as a result of the promulgation of the statement. Along similar lines, the Commission contends that the Policy Statement is not ripe for review because the statement, standing alone, will not have an “immediate and significant” impact on any party to this case. We acknowledge that CAPP’s faci al challenge to the Policy Statement raises substantial issu es of both standing and ripeness. We need not address these threshold issues, however, because we have resolved the merits arguments raised by CAPP in our decision in the related case of ExxonMobil v. FERC , No. 04- 1102, et al. (May 29, 2007). We thus dismiss CAPP’s petition for review as moot in light of our subsequent holding. So ordered.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Becht, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of driving while intoxicated as a felony, defendant contends that the proof was legally insufficient. We disagree. Contrary to defendant’s argument, the proof was not wholly circumstantial and thus the moral certainty standard does not apply *(see, People v Barnes,*50 NY2d 375, 380). Defendant himself testified that he was drunk, the results of the breathalyzer test were in evidence, and the arresting officer testified that defendant told him that he had been cruising and had stopped to relieve himself when his motorcycle tipped over. The proof was legally sufficient *(see generally, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Orleans County Court, Miles, J.—felony driving while intoxicated.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.