alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,926] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 25, 2008 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Veyance Technologies, Inc., Fairlawn, Ohio. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC. this 29th day of August 2008. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-20692 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Sage, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited *591by his motion, from three amended sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), all imposed July 29,1987.

Ordered that the appeal from the amended sentence imposed July 29, 1987 under indictment No. 7081/83 is dismissed, as that amended sentence was superseded by a second amended sentence of the same court imposed September 21, 1989; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended sentences imposed under indictments Nos. 5204/83 and 3707/84 are affirmed. No opinion. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### The Village of Bay *v.*Borchers.

(No. 24484

Decided December 27, 1933.)

*Mr. B. C. Boer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Morgan, Landfear & Baskin,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

THE HILLS AT LEHIGH VALLEY, LP,

 Petitioner

 v.

COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON

REVENUE APPEALS BOARD AND

BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

AND COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 84 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                     |     |                                            
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                            
|Date: August 8, 2008 | By: | /s/ M.J. Cohen                             
|                     |     | M. J. Cohen
Interim Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20958]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 3, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Heritage Bancorp, Inc., Mason, Tennessee; to directly acquire 
2.12 percent, for total direct and indirect ownership of 51.77 percent, 
of Mason Bancorp, Inc., Mason, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly 
acquire The Bank of Mason, Mason Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 5, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-20958 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,839
<SECURITIES>                                 2,246,390
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,602,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,881
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                     514,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,602,657
<SALES>                                          7,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,794
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7002 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to 

be illuminated by blue and yellow lights in support of 

Ukraine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7002 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gateway Solidarity 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ILLUMINATION OF THE GATEWAY ARCH IN SUP5 PORT OF UKRAINE. 

6 To show support and solidarity with the 

7 Ukrainian people, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

8 illuminate the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, 

9 by blue and yellow lights— 

10 (A) in 2022, within 15 days following en11 actment of this act, for no fewer than 5 con12 secutive days; and 

13 (B) annually on August 24, in recognition 

14 of Ukrainian Independence Day, until the 

15 President reports to Congress that the govern16 ment of the Russian Federation has ceased its 

17 destabilizing activities with respect to the sov18 ereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
exv10w22



 




EXHIBIT 10.22




Rent-A-Center, Inc.

Summary of Director Compensation



Non-employee directors each receive an annual retainer of $30,000, payable in four equal
installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter. Additionally, non-employee directors each
receive $2,000 for each Board of Directors meeting and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended
in person and are reimbursed for their expenses in attending such meetings. Non-employee directors
also each receive $500 for each telephonic Board of Directors or committee meeting attended.



Non-employee directors receive options to purchase 9,000 shares of Rent-A-Center, Inc. common stock
on the first business day of the first full fiscal year of service as a director and options to
purchase 5,000 shares of Rent-A-Center common stock on the first business day of each year
thereafter. The exercise price of the options is the fair market value of shares of Rent-A-Center
common stock on the grant date. These options vest and are exercisable immediately.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report on Form 10-K/A of Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald T. Barnes,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:  November 30,2009

 
|   | /s/Ronald T. Barnes                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Ronald T. Barnes                        |
|   | Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial |
|   | Officer and Secretary                   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-18-1999
<CASH>                                             744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,866
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,744
<PP&E>                                         101,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,314
<BONDS>                                         39,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,502
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,133
<SALES>                                         84,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,643
<CGS>                                           68,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,797
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97


</TABLE>
Order entered October 26, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00778-CV

D. REGINALD STOVER, JACE HARKEY, ROBERT H. HOLMES 

AND THE HOLMES LAW FIRM, INC., Appellants

V.

ADM MILLING CO., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13400

ORDER

Before the Court is the October 24, 2017 motion of appellants Robert H. Holmes and The 

Holmes Law Firm, Inc. seeking a second extension of time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT

the motion. Appellants Robert H. Holmes and The Holmes Law Firm, Inc’s brief shall be filed 

by November 30, 2017. We caution appellants that further requests for extension will be 

disfavored. 

.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20724]



[[Page 52029]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Concerning Ratchet 
Hook Tourniquet

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is 
made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in 
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/090,042 entitled 
``Ratchet Hook Tourniquet,'' filed August 19, 2008. The United States 
Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in 
this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both 
at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention is an improvement of the 
traditional ratchet tourniquet used to stop uncontrollable bleeding 
from gunshot wounds and blast injuries to the arms and legs.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-20724 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6937 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6937

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the information 
                 reporting threshold for slot winnings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2022

 Ms. Titus (for herself, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Mr. 
  Amodei, and Mr. Horsford) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the information 
                 reporting threshold for slot winnings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTING THRESHOLD FOR SLOT MACHINES.

    (a) In General.--Section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) Slot Machines.--
            ``(1) In general.--No return shall be required under 
        subsection (a) in the case of a payment in the course of a 
        trade or business of winnings from one slot machine play unless 
        the winnings from one such play are at least $5,000 (without 
        reduction for the amount wagered).
            ``(2) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of payments in any 
        calendar year beginning after 2023, the $5,000 amount in 
        paragraph (1) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `2022' for `2016' in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
        If any increase determined under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $100, such increase shall be rounded to the 
        nearest multiple of $100.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to payments after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State, ex rel. Erman, *v.*Gilman, Dir., et al.

(No. 24211

Decided December 6, 1933.)

*420*Messrs. Paxton & Seasongood,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, for defendants in error Gilman, Director, et al.

*Messrs. Freiberg & Simmonds, Messrs. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister*and *Mr. Jerome Goldberg,*for defendants in error Taxicabs of Cincinnati et al.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed on authority of *Miner*v. *Witt,*82 Ohio St., 237.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
IIA 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 117

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2002

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of the commemorative work in the 

District of Columbia honoring former President John Adams.

Whereas section 8908 of title 40, United States Code, provides that the location of a commemorative work in the 

area described as Area I shall be deemed disapproved unless approved by law not later than 150 days after
2

HJ 117 RDS 

notification to Congress that the commemorative work 

should be located in Area I;

Whereas Public Law 107–62 (115 Stat. 411) authorized the 

Adams Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 

honor former President John Adams and his legacy; and 

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress 

of her determination that a memorial to former President 

John Adams should be located in Area I: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK. 

4 (a) APPROVAL.—Congress approves the location for 

5 the commemorative work to honor former President John 

6 Adams and his legacy, as authorized by Public Law 107–

7 62 (115 Stat. 411), within Area I as described in section 

8 8908 of title 40, United States Code, subject to the limita9 tion in subsection (b). 

10 (b) LIMITATION.—The commemorative work ap11 proved in subsection (a) shall not be located within the 

12 Reserve. 

13 (c) DEFINITION OF RESERVE.—In this section the 

14 term ‘‘Reserve’’ means the area of The National Mall ex15 tending from the United States Capitol to the Lincoln Me16 morial, and from the White House to the Jefferson Memo-
3

HJ 117 RDS 

1 rial, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Commemorative 

2 Areas Washington, DC and Environs,’’ numbered 869/

3 86501A and dated May 1, 2002.

Passed the House of Representatives November 15 

(legislative day, November 14), 2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
#### CITIZENS’ BANK & TRUST CO. v. MAGNOLIA SUGAR COOPERATIVE, Inc., et al.

No. 2399.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 1, 1942.

Elton A. Darsey and Robt.-B. Butler, Jr., both of Houma, for appellant.

Harold Moses, D. R. Stump, and H. F. Steiner, all of New Orleans, and Ellender & Wright, of Houma, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Madison L. Funderburk v. Magnolia Sugar Cooperative, Inc., et al., La.App., 8 So. 2d 374, this day decided:

It is ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed and set aside insofar as it sustained the exception of no right of action; that insofar as said judgment dismissed the suit of plaintiff at its cost, it is hereby affirmed.