alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barbara Jean Henderson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the People failed to present sufficient independent evidence to corroborate the testimony of her accomplice. The corroborative evidence need not demonstrate that defendant committed the crime; it need only tend to connect defendant with the crime sufficiently to establish that the accomplice is telling the truth *(see,*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Smith,*55 NY2d 945; *People v Glasper,*52 NY2d 970). Proof that silverware and a fraudulent sales receipt were found in the trunk of a car within defendant’s control was sufficient to corroborate the accomplice’s testimony concerning defendant’s involvement in a scheme to steal merchandise from a store *(see, People v Pasciuta,*104 AD2d 1010).

*889The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the grand larceny count of the indictment upon the ground of duplicity. Such a motion must be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the People prior to the commencement of trial (CPL 200.30, 210.20 [1] [a]; [2]; 210.25 [1]; 210.45 [1]; 255.20; *see also, People v James,*98 AD2d 863, 865). The instant motion, made orally and during the course of trial, was untimely. In any event, the motion lacked merit. Multiple petit larcenies committed over a period of time against the same victim pursuant to a single intent and in furtherance of a common fraudulent scheme may be alleged in a single count of grand larceny *(see, People v Cox,*286 NY 137, 141, *rearg denied*286 NY 706; *People v Gutterson,*244 NY 243; *People v Amereno,*31 Misc 2d 806, 807; *see also, People v Perlstein,*97 AD2d 482, 484). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—petit larceny.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

     I, Thomas M. O’Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public ServiceEnterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated. 

/s/ Thomas M. O’Flynn
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as special servicerunder the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactionslisted on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to anylimitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 19, 2019

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSC 2018-H3

Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust2018-H3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-H3

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10029

Group Email

 

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

Att: MSC 2018-H3

New York NY 10016

Group

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices

 

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation

1100 North Market Street

Wilimington DE 19890

Dorri Costello

 

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington DE 19890

Group
[No. 33871.

*En Banc.*

November 21, 1957.]

#### Al Hayes, *Appellant,*v. Weldon Gwinn *et al.,*Respondents.2

*Alvin J. Ziontz*and *Joseph B. Smith,*for appellant.

*Taylor & Taylor,*for respondents.

2

Reported in 317 P. (2d) 1071.

Per Curiam.

Upon a hearing *En Banc,*a majority of the court adheres to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, and reported in 49 Wn. (2d) 908, 307 P. (2d) 1063.
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2006-QS5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered
by the Issuing  Entity's  report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's  performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
        Title: Executive Vice President
Exhibit 10.34



SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE DIXIE GROUP, INC

2004 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


 

Directors who are employees of The Dixie Group, Inc. do not receive any additional compensation for their services as members of the Board of Directors.  For fiscal 2004, non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $12,000 cash and $12,000 in value of Performance Units under the Company's Directors Stock Plan.  In addition to the annual retainer, directors who are not employees of the Company receive $1,000 for each Board meeting attended and $500 for each committee meeting attended.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of January 1, 2018, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVINGCORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as MasterServicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor andAsset Representations Reviewer with respect to Benchmark 2018-B1 Mortgage TrustCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-B1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.             Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.             Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         644,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                    117,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,051,784
<PP&E>                                      15,304,747
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,984,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,371,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,071,610
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,371,846
<SALES>                                      1,242,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,384,966
<CGS>                                        1,017,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,370,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,148
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1
 
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
William V. Carney, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porta Systems Corp.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors:
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  ****Dated: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ William V.
    CarneyWilliam V. CarneyChief Executive
  Officer
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 92

Disapproving the rule issued by the Department of Health and Human

Services relating to modification of the Medicaid upper payment limit

for non-State government-owned or operated hospitals published on January 18, 2002.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 2002

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mrs. THURMAN, Mrs.

MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. HINCHEY, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr.

DEUTSCH, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ,

Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr.

WAXMAN, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, and

Mr. SNYDER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the rule issued by the Department of Health

and Human Services relating to modification of the Medicaid upper payment limit for non-State governmentowned or operated hospitals published on January 18,

2002.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Sec-
2

•HJ 92 IH

1 retary of Health and Human Services on March 15, 2002

2 (67 Fed. Reg. 2602, published on January 18, 2002) re3 lating to modification of the Medicaid upper payment limit

4 for non-State government-owned or operated hospitals,

5 and such rule shall have no force or effect.

Æ
107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 117 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of the commemorative work in the 

District of Columbia honoring former President John Adams. 

Whereas section 8908 of title 40, United States Code, provides that the location of a commemorative work in the 

area described as Area I shall be deemed disapproved unless approved by law not later than 150 days after notifiVerDate Aug 31 2005 10:23 Apr 26, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\RENEE\HJ117.EH HJ117

cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 117 EH 

cation to Congress that the commemorative work should 

be located in Area I; 

Whereas Public Law 107–62 (115 Stat. 411) authorized the 

Adams Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 

honor former President John Adams and his legacy; and 

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress 

of her determination that a memorial to former President 

John Adams should be located in Area I: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK. 

4 (a) APPROVAL.—Congress approves the location for 

5 the commemorative work to honor former President John 

6 Adams and his legacy, as authorized by Public Law 107– 

7 62 (115 Stat. 411), within Area I as described in section 

8 8908 of title 40, United States Code, subject to the limita9 tion in subsection (b). 

10 (b) LIMITATION.—The commemorative work ap11 proved in subsection (a) shall not be located within the 

12 Reserve. 

13 (c) DEFINITION OF RESERVE.—In this section the 

14 term ‘‘Reserve’’ means the area of The National Mall ex15 tending from the United States Capitol to the Lincoln Me16 morial, and from the White House to the Jefferson Memo17 rial, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Commemorative 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

•HJ 117 EH 

1 Areas Washington, DC and Environs,’’ numbered 869/ 

2 86501A and dated May 1, 2002. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15 

(legislative day, November 14), 2002. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 117 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of the commemorative work 

President John Adams. in the District of Columbia honoring former 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10702 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. LE ONARDO I VAN HERNAN DEZ - ES PI NOSA D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 4 : 0 8 - CR- 1 2 - ALL B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderappoi nt ed to r epr es ent Leonardo I van H erna n dez-E spi n osa ( H erna n dez) ha s m oved f or l eave t o w i t h draw an d h as f i l ed a br i e f i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U . S . 7 38 (1967). H erna n dez h a s n o tfi le d a r e s p o n s e . O u rin d e p e n d e n tr e v ie w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l’s bri ef di s c l o s e s no n on f

rivol ou s i ssue f

or app eal . A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave t o w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
[No. 34305.

Department One.

March 13, 1958.]

#### Elizabeth C. Akins, *Appellant,*v. Edward S. Akins, *Respondent.**1*

*Frederick B. Cohen, John E. Bowen,*and *John Sterbick,*for appellant.

*Greenwood, Shiers & Presser,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 322 P. (2d) 872.

Per Curiam.

November 28,1951, Elizabeth C. Akins and Edward S. Akins (each approximately forty-four years of age) were married. No issue resulted from this marriage. Elizabeth Akins’ minor child by a previous marriage lived with them.

*888July 16, 1956, Elizabeth Akins commenced this action for divorce, alleging personal indignities. Edward Akins answered, denying the allegations of the complaint, and cross-complained for a divorce upon the same grounds. Plaintiff’s reply denied the allegations of the cross-complaint. Upon the issues thus joined, the cause proceeded to trial.

From the decree granting a divorce to both parties and making a property division, Mrs. Akins has appealed.

Appellant contends that the court erred in finding that both parties were guilty of personal indignities and in granting the respondent a divorce. Respondent has not cross-appealed. The parties will, therefore, remain divorced regardless of whether or not the respondent should have been granted a divorce. If the court erred in this regard, it is not prejudicial. *Smith v. Smith,*45 Wn. (2d) 672, 277 P. (2d) 339 (1954); *Merkel v. Merkel,*39 Wn. (2d) 102, 234 P. (2d) 857 (1951).

It is next contended by appellant that there was an unjust and inequitable community property division. A wide latitude of discretion is allowed a trial court in the division of property as part of a divorce decree. *Murphy v. Murphy,*44 Wn. (2d) 737, 270 P. (2d) 808 (1954); *Toivonen v. Toivonen,*44 Wn. (2d) 473, 268 P. (2d) 456 (1954). The evidence in the instant case as to the contributions of the parties to the community property was conflicting. Our review of the record convinces us that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.

Finally, appellant’s request that this court grant an allowance of attorneys’ fees for this appeal is denied, for the reason that appellant did not show a financial need. *Blakey v. Blakey, ante*p. 404, 318 P. (2d) 958 (1957); *Koon v. Koon,*50 Wn. (2d) 577, 313 P. (2d) 369 (1957).

The decree is affirmed. Neither party will recover costs.
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: May 13, 2004

                                               J. BEN HATHAWAY
                                               ---------------
                                               J. Ben Hathaway
                                                  President


























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




     Date: May 13, 2004

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer