alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |  |                                                          |                                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 4, 2016 |  |  |  |  |                                                          | /s/ Allen F.
Grum                                 
|                   |  |  |  |  |                                                          | Allen F. Grum, President
(Chief Executive Officer)
|                   |  |  | 
|Dated: May 4, 2016 |  |  |  |  |                                                          | /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy                           
|                   |  |  |  |  | Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer
(Chief Financial Officer)
|                   |  |
Exhibit 34.2









Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

U.S. Bank National Association



We have examined management’s assertion, included
in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”)
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the
U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended October 31, 2021, except for servicing criteria Items
1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company
has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management
is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less
than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing
activities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors
may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence
we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that
the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended October 31, 2021, for the U.S. Bank Corporate
Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/Ernst & Young LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 21, 2021
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      The  undersigned  chief  financial  officer of the Registrant  does hereby
certify  that  this  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Act of 1934,  as
amended, and that the information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.

      Dated November 14, 2003                     By /s/Edward B. Kornfeld
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Edward B. Kornfeld
                                                     Senior Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Driver Passport, Inc. a North Dakota
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Randy Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Driver Passport, Inc., and will be retained by Driver Passport, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 /s/ Randy
      BrownRandy
      Brown
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                  Chief Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2008
#### AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Miss Essie TALLEY et al., Defendants, Appellants.

No. 3862.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 18, 1931.

Argued before DREW, McGREGOR, and TALIAFERRO, JJ.

Judge J. W. Jones, of Natchitoches, for appellants.

W. Peyton Cunningham, of Natchitoches, for appellee.

McGREGOR, J.

This is a suit for $593.85 for the balance due on the purchase price of an automobile and certain necessary repairs. There was judgment in the lower court in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for, and the defendants have perfected a devolutive appeal.

Neither side has made any appearance in this court. A careful examination of the record discloses no error in the judgment appealed from, and, in accordance with the custom of the court, it is hereby affirmed; defendants to pay all costs of both courts.
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QA4 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  National City Mortgage
Co., Provident Funding Associates, LP and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
#### Maureen Rogers et al., Appellants, v Daniel K. Ettinger et al., Respondents.

Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (John C. Marbach, J.), entered on December 22, 1988, granting defendant Rivera’s motion and defendant Ettinger’s cross motion, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c), for *258summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs; judgment of said court entered on January 20, 1989, awarding defendant Ettinger judgment on said order, unanimously affirmed, without costs; and judgment of said court, entered on January 24, 1989, awarding defendant Rivera judgment on said order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs alleged that defendants had improperly settled plaintiff Rogers’ Family Court matter for child support, against the wishes of plaintiff D’Agostino, who had represented Rogers in the paternity matter against the child’s father. Contrary to the claim raised by plaintiffs on appeal, the court below did not rely entirely upon the stipulated settlement in the action handled by defendants as a basis for concluding that plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate a prima facie case of legal malpractice.

Recognizing that, in such an action, a client cannot recover against an errant attorney without demonstrating that it would otherwise have succeeded on the merits *(Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. Co.,*64 NY2d 419, 425), we conclude that the court below properly found that plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate a prima facie case. The court’s ruling was not solely dependent upon the fact that plaintiff Rogers had voluntarily entered into the stipulated settlement. Plaintiffs are correct that this would have been a breach of the holding in *Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy*(59 AD2d 551, *affd*45 NY2d 730*on concurring opn at*59 AD2d, *supra,*at 552-553). It was based upon the fact that plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion and cross motion for summary judgment completely failed to demonstrate a triable issue as to whether the settlement entered into was improvident or that Rogers would have been entitled to a more beneficial settlement, but for defendants’ misconduct. *(Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. Co., supra; Becker v Julien, Blitz & Schlesinger,*95 Misc 2d 64, 67.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10Q of PVC Container Corporation ("PVCC") for the
period ended December 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.  Shapiro, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PVC Container Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

3)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

4)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PVCC.

/s/ Jeffrey A. Shapiro
---------------------------------------------------------
Name:   Jeffrey A. Shapiro
Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   February 14, 2003



                                                                            20
IA 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 113

Recognizing the contributions of Patsy T. Mink. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2002

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. 

ROEMER, Mr. SCOTT, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mrs. 

MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. KIND, Mr. FORD, Mr. 

KUCINICH, Mr. WU, Mr. HOLT, Ms. SOLIS, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. HONDA, Ms. LEE, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. MCINTYRE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MORAN of 

Virginia, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, 

Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. SANCHEZ, Mr. GREENWOOD, 

Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. PETERSON

of Minnesota, and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of Patsy T. Mink.

Whereas Patsy Takemoto Mink was one of the country’s 

leading voices for women’s rights, civil rights, and working families and was devoted to raising living standards 

and providing economic and educational opportunity to 

all Americans; 

Whereas Patsy T. Mink was a passionate and persistent 

fighter against economic and social injustices in Hawaii 

and across America; 
2

•HJ 113 IH 

Whereas Patsy T. Mink was one of the first women of color 

to win national office in 1964 and opened doors of opportunity to millions of women and people of color across 

America; 

Whereas Pasty Mink won unprecedented legislative accomplishments on issues affecting women’s health, children, 

students, and working families; and 

Whereas Patsy T. Mink’s heroic, visionary, and tireless leadership to win the landmark passage of title IX of the 

Education Amendments of 1972 opened doors to women’s academic and athletic achievements and redefined 

what is possible for a generation of women and for future 

generations our Nation’s daughters: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 

4 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.; P.L. 92–318) may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Patsy T. Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51357-51358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0457; Airspace Docket No. 08-AAL-16]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Red Dog, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects two errors in the airspace description 
contained in a Final Rule that was published in the Federal Register on 
Friday, July 25, 2008 (73 FR 43351), Airspace Docket No. 08-AAL-16.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, September 25, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, AAL-538G, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587; 
telephone number (907) 271-5898; fax: (907) 271-2850; e-mail. Internet 
address: http://www.alaska.faa.gov/at.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    Federal Register Document E8-16962, Airspace Docket No. 08-AAL-16, 
published on Friday, July 25, 2008 (73 FR 43351), revised Class E 
airspace at Red Dog, AK. An error was discovered in the airspace 
description that misidentified the airfield location. A

[[Page 51358]]

typographical error in the description was also identified. This action 
corrects these two errors.

Correction to Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the airspace 
description of the Class E airspace published in the Federal Register, 
Friday, July 25, 2008 (73 FR 43351), (FR Doc E8-16962, page 43351, 
column 3) is corrected as follows:


Sec.  71.1  [Corrected]

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Red Dog, AK [Corrected]

Red Dog, AK
    (Lat. 68[deg]01'56'' N., Long. 162[deg]53'57'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within an 11-mile radius of the Red Dog Airport, AK, and within 4 
miles either side of the 219[deg] bearing from the Red Dog Airport, 
AK, extending from the 11-mile radius to 14.5 miles southwest of the 
Red Dog Airport, AK; and that airspace extending upward from 1,200 
feet above the surface within a 72.5-mile radius of the Red Dog 
Airport, AK.
* * * * *

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on August 22, 2008.
James Miller,
Acting Manager, Alaska Flight Service Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. E8-20313 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                               EXHIBIT 10 (b)

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                            QUAKER STATE CORPORATION
                                  PENSION PLAN
                        SALARIED EMPLOYEES PLAN DOCUMENT

     This Amendment made effective as of April 14, 1998 by Quaker State
Corporation (the "Corporation").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Corporation has established the Quaker State Corporation
Pension Plan, Salaried Employees Plan document (as heretofore amended, the
"Plan");

     WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended in accordance with Article X thereof; and

     WHEREAS, the Corporation wishes to amend the Plan as herein provided;

     NOW, THEREFORE, under the powers retained by the Corporation's Board of
Directors under Article X of the Plan and pursuant to the authorization of the
Board of Directors granted on April 14, 1998, the Corporation hereby amends the
Plan as follows:

1.      Section 10.1 shall be amended by deleting the last sentence thereof.

2.      Paragraph (f) of Section 11.2 shall be amended by deleting the text
        "Except as otherwise provided by Section 11.3, in" and replacing it with
        the word "In".

3.      Section 11.3 shall be deleted in its entirety.

4.      Section 11.4 shall be renumbered Section 11.3 and the text "except as
        may otherwise be provided by Section 11.3," shall be deleted from the
        first sentence thereof.

5.      Section 11.5 shall be renumbered Section 11.4.

6.      Section 11.6 shall be renumbered Section 11.5.

7.      In all other respects, the provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified
        and confirmed, and shall continue in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has evidenced the adoption of this
Amendment to the Plan by the signature of its duly authorized officer.


                                      QUAKER STATE CORPORATION

                                      By: /s/ Paul E. Konney
                                          -------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Paul E. Konney
                                        Title:   Senior Vice President, General
                                                    Counsel and Secretary

Attest:

By: /s/ Carrie L. Sherwood
   -------------------------------------
Name:  Carrie L. Sherwood
Title:   Assistant Secretary




                                       15
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Noel Alston, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), rendered May 8, 1987, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.