alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, October 20, 2008.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday October 20, 2008, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340,                           ( print page 53074)                        Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

*The agenda will include:*                     Various IRS issues.                

Dated: August 29, 2008.

Roy L. Block,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-20947 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 provide that certain trust funds are outside the budget of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2001

 Mr. Taylor of Mississippi introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 provide that certain trust funds are outside the budget of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The receipts (including attributable interest) and 
outlays of the following trust funds shall not be counted as receipts 
or outlays of the United States: the Federal Old-Age and Survivors 
Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, the 
Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Supplementary 
Medical Insurance Trust Fund, the Civil Service Retirement and 
Disability Fund, and the Department of Defense Military Retirement 
Fund.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall enforce and implement this Article by 
appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 3. This Article shall take effect beginning with the 
first fiscal year beginning at least 180 days after its 
ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7090 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7090

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary of 
the Treasury to permit an election relating to property transferred in 
        connection with services to be made in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2022

  Mr. McHenry (for himself and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary of 
the Treasury to permit an election relating to property transferred in 
        connection with services to be made in electronic form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating Paperwork for Startups 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC FILING OF ELECTION RELATING TO PROPERTY TRANSFERRED 
              IN CONNECTION WITH SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 83(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``(except that such election may be made 
in electronic form)'' after ``in such manner as the Secretary 
prescribes''.
    (b) Confirmation.--In the case of any election under section 83(b) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which is made in electronic form, 
the Secretary of the Treasury shall ensure that a confirmation of such 
election is sent in electronic form to the person making such election.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this Act shall apply to 
elections made after the date that is 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IIA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 79

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 18), 2001

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2002, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 107–44 is further amended by striking

4 the date specified in section 107(c) and inserting in lieu
2

HJ 79 RDS

1 thereof ‘‘January 10, 2002’’; and by striking the date

2 specified in section 123 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘Jan3 uary 1, 2002’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 20,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
.$. DISTRICT COURT
pisvaicr OF NEWHAMPSHIRE

AUG O 9 2005
FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Parks
v. Case No. 04-cv-445-PB

Carol Tatarinowicz, et al

ORDER

The plaintiff having failed to comply with the court’s Order dated July 5, 2005,
the above case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Q4e >
August 2. , 2005

Paul Barbadoro
United States District Judge

ce: William Parks, pro se
Karla Black, Esq.
Donald Gardner, Esq.
Kenneth D. Murphy, Esq.
William G. Scott, Esq.
Charles P. Bauer, Esq.
Lawrence B. Gormley, Esq.
Exhibit 21**Subsidiaries of ORBCOMM Inc.**       Subsidiary Jurisdiction of Organization % Owned       ORBCOMM LLC Delaware  100%       ORBCOMM License Corp. Delaware  100%       ORBCOMM Canada Inc. New Brunswick, Canada  100%       ORBCOMM Curacao Gateway N.V. Curacao  100%       ORBCOMM International Holdings LLC Delaware  100%       ORBCOMM New Zealand Limited New Zealand  100%       Leosatellite Services de Ecuador S.A. Ecuador  100%       ORBCOMM Panama Incorporated Inc. Panama  100%       ORBCOMM Central America Holdings LLC Delaware  100%       ORBCOMM Australia Gateway Company Pty. Limited Australia  100%       Stellar Satellite Communications Ltd. British Virgin Islands  100%       Satcom International Group PLC England and Wales  52.13%       ORBCOMM Europe LLC Delaware  50%       MITE Global Communications S.A. de C.V. Mexico  35%       ORBCOMM Maghreb Morocco  22.96%       European Datacomm Holding NV Belgium  1.82% Listed above are certain consolidated subsidiaries included in the consolidated financialstatements of ORBCOMM Inc. Unlisted subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate, do not constitute asignificant subsidiary.
#### Opal FREDERICK, as Executor of the Estate of John C. Frederick, Deceased, Appellee, v. TPG HOSPITALITY, INC., Appellant, Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Appellee.

No. 00-7255.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 13, 2002.

Before SENTELLE, RANDOLPH, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that the Aetna policy excludes coverage of TPG’s claim. Therefore it also correctly decided not to reach the question whether Aetna was TPG’s primary insurance provider.

We need not decide whether the endorsement provision applies only to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and not to TPG, because TPG failed to raise this issue before the district court. *See Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. Dep’t of Labor,*159 F.3d 597, 605-06 (D.C.Cir.1998).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.




                                    /s/ E. James Ferland
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    E. James Ferland
                                    Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    May 5, 2005
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 12, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 12, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0256. RANDALL LANDERS v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CR846
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Annual Revision (400 KB PDF) (ASCII)  Table 5 [1]
 Item
Revised change(percent)
Difference betweenrevised and earlier changes(percentage points)2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013Total industry
-.4
-2.1
1.3
2.2
1.9
.3
-.2
.6
.6
-.2Manufacturing[2]
-2.3
-2.0
.6
1.6
1.8
.4
.4
.5
.2
-.3Manufacturing (NAICS)
-2.3
-2.1
.7
1.7
1.9
.5
.4
.5
.1
-.3Durable manufacturing
-1.1
-.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
.5
.9
1.3
-.3
-.3Nondurable manufacturing
-3.5
-3.7
-1.2
1.0
1.6
.5
-.1
-.5
.5
-.2Other manufacturing (non-NAICS)
-3.2
.3
.2
-.8
-1.2
-.4
1.4
2.0
1.8
-.2Mining
4.9
-1.0
4.6
4.7
3.9
-.1
-.7
1.9
2.5
.8Utilities
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.9
.7
-.1
-3.5
-1.2
-.4
-.4Selected high-technology industries
6.7
11.1
26.4
4.1
4.9
3.7
10.8
16.1
.9
.4Manufacturing[2] ex. selectedhigh-technology industries
-2.9
-2.7
-.5
1.5
1.6
.2
-.1
-.1
.2
-.3Stage-of-process groupsCrude
3.3
-1.5
3.4
3.2
3.1
.3
-1.1
1.4
1.5
.8Primary and semifinished
-.7
-1.1
1.4
.7
.8
.3
.0
1.1
.6
-.4Finished
-3.2
-2.1
.4
3.3
2.9
.4
.1
-.5
-.2
-.2    Return to table   Return to table    Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6952-6953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator or Foreign 
Utility Company Status

January 29, 2008.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reliant Energy Mandalay, Inc.............  EG08-1-000
Arlington Wind Power Project LLC.........  EG08-2-000
Forked River Power LLC...................  EG08-3-000

[[Page 6953]]

 
FPL Energy Oliver Wind II, LCC...........  EG08-4-000
Marble River, LLC........................  EG08-5-000
Santa Rosa Energy Center, LLC............  EG08-6-000
Long Beach Peakers LLC...................  EG08-7-000
Plum Point Energy Associates, L.L.C......  EG08-8-000
Wharton County Generation, LLC...........  EG08-9-000
Macquarie Bank Limited...................  FC08-1-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of December 2007, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-2109 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
FRB NAICS Industry Price Indexes,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,1987,1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,log price index: industry output: NAICS 3342,4.605,4.541,4.497,4.438,4.369,4.325,4.276,4.244,4.181,4.123,4.035,3.928,3.845,3.78,3.711,3.625,3.525,3.418,3.364,3.299,3.234,3.162,3.104,3.029,2.97,2.907,2.855,2.795,2.732,2.668log price index: industry output: NAICS 334210,4.605,4.537,4.467,4.416,4.363,4.311,4.247,4.171,4.086,4.004,3.902,3.759,3.641,3.544,3.402,3.3,3.157,2.985,2.838,2.714,2.579,2.495,2.418,2.296,2.174,2.073,1.977,1.877,1.773,1.674log price index: industry output: NAICS 334220,4.605,4.474,4.384,4.249,4.106,4.02,3.928,3.891,3.774,3.668,3.504,3.322,3.203,3.112,3.036,2.872,2.716,2.568,2.552,2.469,2.405,2.259,2.152,2.045,1.979,1.879,1.807,1.721,1.626,1.531log price index: industry output: NAICS 334290,4.605,4.612,4.64,4.65,4.637,4.643,4.653,4.67,4.684,4.696,4.7,4.703,4.691,4.683,4.693,4.703,4.702,4.701,4.7,4.713,4.718,4.73,4.741,4.747,4.757,4.768,4.779,4.785,4.794,4.8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Estate of Margaret Lunt

v. Case No. 04-cv-398-PB

Gregory Alan Gaylor

O R D E R

Gregory Alan Gaylor has filed a motion to reopen this case 

for the limited purpose of ordering the Estate of Margaret Lunt

(“Estate”) to provide a partnership accounting. For the reasons

set forth in this order, I deny his motion. 

Gaylor bases his request for an accounting on New Hampshire

Rev. Stat. Ann. § 304-A:22, which provides that: 

Any partner shall have the right to a formal account as

to partnership affairs:

I. If he is wrongfully excluded from the

partnership business or possession of its

property by his co-partners.

II. If the right exists under the terms of

any agreement.

III. As provided by RSA 304-A:21 [when a

partner retains a benefit or profits obtained

without the consent of other partners].

IV. Whenever other circumstances render it

just and reasonable. 

Gaylor presumably contends that the Estate can be compelled

to provide an accounting because the circumstances of the case 

Case 1:04-cv-00398-PB Document 96 Filed 06/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1 Gaylor may be arguing that the Estate should be required

to obtain an accounting from him before it can be permitted to

proceed with its damage claims. See, e.g., Smith v. Manchester

Management Corp., 117 N.H. 361, 363 (1977). The Estate is

seeking an accounting from Gaylor, see Writ of Summons § V(A),

and the stay does not prevent Gaylor from voluntarily providing

an accounting. Moreover, Gaylor remains free to argue when the

stay is lifted that the Estate must obtain an accounting from him

before it can proceed with its damage claims. 

2 Either party may move to lift the stay at any time for

the purpose of obtaining a trial on the pending claims and

counterclaims.

-2-

make an accounting “just and reasonable.” I find no support in

the record for this argument. Gaylor was the general partner in

the partnership in question and Margaret Lunt was merely a

limited partner. Gaylor does not allege that the Estate has

possession of partnership records or partnership assets. Under

these circumstances, Gaylor has no right to an accounting from

the Estate simply because the Estate has sued him.1 

Gaylor’s Motion to Reopen the Proceedings and Lift the Stay

(Doc. No. 92) is denied.2

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 30, 2006

cc: Gregory Alan Gaylor, pro se

David H. Bownes, Esq.

Case 1:04-cv-00398-PB Document 96 Filed 06/30/06 Page 2 of 2
| 9601      AMBERGLEN BLVD., SUITE 117 | 306      WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 302 | 1000      LOUISIANA STREET, SUITE 625 |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| AUSTIN,      TEXAS 78729-1106        | FORT      WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987       | HOUSTON,      TEXAS 77002-5008        |
| 512-249-7000                         | 817-336-2461                            | 713-651-9944                          |
| FAX      512-233-2618                | FAX      817-877-3728                   | FAX      713-651-9980                 |
|                                 |                                    |                                  |
|                                 | MARCH      12, 2009                     |                                  |

|   |                                                             |                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   | Yours      very truly,                                           |
|   |                                                             |                     |
|   |                                                             | /s/      W. TODD BROOKER |
|   | W.      Todd Brooker, P.E.                                       |
|   | Vice      PresidentCAWLEY,      GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|   |                                                             |
|   |                                                             |
|   |                                                             |
|   |                                                             |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

HARRY A. BOATNER JR., 

 Petitioner 

No. 59 WM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Extraordinary

Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (stating 

that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to 

forward the filing to counsel of record.
---

### Capacity and Capacity Utilization

- Data from January 1986 to presentCapacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and UtilitiesIndustrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and
      Utilities
- Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and Utilities
- Industrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and
      Utilities
- Data through 1986Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and UtilitiesIndustrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and
Utilities
- Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and Utilities
- Industrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and
Utilities
- Documentation: This file includes the descriptions of all the series in Tables 3 and 4 along with the series codes that represent them in the data files.

---
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended April 4, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|Date:   May 11, 2004 |  | /s/   R. F. Lieble                   | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | 
|                     |  |                                     
|                     |  | R. F. Lieble,Chief Financial Officer | 

---