alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Property, Plant And Equipment (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Property, Plant And Equipment [Abstract]**                                                           |            |   |   |
| Depreciation expense                                                                                   | $ 841.5         | $ 844.6 | $ 881.5 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of expense recognized in the current period that reflects the allocation of the cost of tangible assets over the assets' useful lives. Includes production and non-production related depreciation.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 45 -Paragraph 28 -Subparagraph (b) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=31042434&loc=d3e3602-108585
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_Depreciation**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_PropertyPlantAndEquipmentAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00478-CR

NO. 03-15-00479-CR

David Wayne Stokes, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 74268 & 73914, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

These are appeals pursuant to Anders v. California. In two causes consolidated for 1

trial, appellant David Wayne Stokes, Jr., pleaded guilty to the offenses of burglary of a building and

burglary of a vehicle. In each cause, Stokes also pleaded true to the allegations in five enhancement 2

paragraphs alleging five prior state-jail-felonyconvictions. During the plea hearing, the district court

took judicial notice of Stokes’s signed judicial confessions, in which he admitted to the allegations

contained within the indictments. At the conclusion of the hearing, the district court found the

evidence sufficient to support a finding of guilt but withheld that finding and reset the causes for

sentencing.

 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 1

 See Tex. Penal Code §§ 30.02, .04. 2
At the sentencing hearing, the district court admitted into evidence a letter written

by Stokes, in which he accepted “full responsibility for the charges” against him, attempted to

explain why he had committed the burglaries, and asked the district court to place him on probation.

At the conclusion of the hearing, the district court sentenced Stokes to ten years’ imprisonment in

each cause, with the sentences to run concurrently. These appeals followed. 

In each cause, Stokes’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw

supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets

the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstratingwhy there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel has certified to the Court 3

that he has provided a copy of the motion and brief to Stokes, advised Stokes of his right to examine

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Stokes with a form motion for pro se

access to the appellate record. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed. 4

We have independently reviewed the record and agree with counsel that the

appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeals. In each cause, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

See 386 U.S. at 744-45; see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

3

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972).

 See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 4

2
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Affirmed

Filed: November 4, 2015

Do Not Publish

3
#### Domigan *v.*Domigan.

*(No. 24594*

Decided February 14, 1934.)

*Messrs. Wickham $ Wickham,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Wendell E. Lilly,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PVC Container Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: November 14, 2005

                                        /s/ William J. Bergen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: William J. Bergen
                                        Title: President & Chief Executive
                                        Officer

                                        /s/ Jeffrey Shapiro
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Jeffrey Shapiro
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.


                                       26
NUMBER 13

- 1 3

- 00 215

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MIGUEL AGUIRRE

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 24 th District Court

of Goliad County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Gar za and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Miguel Aguirre , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS the appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be2

enterta ined, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

11th day of July, 2013

.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2010
**Exhibit 10.4**

**CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT**

          AGREEMENT by and between Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washingtoncorporation (the "Company"), and **GARY B. SWOFFORD** (the "Executive"), dated as of the 12th day of March, 1999.

         The Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and itsshareholders to ensure that the Company will have the continued dedication of the Executive, notwithstanding the possibility, threator occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in Section 2) of the Company.  The Board believes that it is imperative to diminishthe inevitable distraction of the Executive by virtue of the personal uncertainties and risks created by a pending or threatenedChange of Control and to encourage the Executive's full attention and dedication to the Company currently and in the event of anythreatened or pending Change of Control, and to provide the Executive with compensation and benefits arrangements upon a Change ofControl which ensure that the compensation and benefits expectations of the Executive will be satisfied, which are competitive withthose of other corporations and which align the Executive's interests with those of the Company's shareholders.  Therefore, in orderto accomplish these objectives, the Board has caused the Company to enter into this Agreement.      
     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
**1.****Certain Definitions**
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6912 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6912

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to require 
that named fiduciaries collect contributions to pooled employer plans, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2022

  Mr. Allen (for himself and Mr. DeSaulnier) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to require 
that named fiduciaries collect contributions to pooled employer plans, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pooled Employer Plan Fix Act''.

SEC. 2. POOLED EMPLOYER PLAN FIDUCIARY REQUIREMENT.

    Section 3(43)(B)(ii) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 
of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(43)(B)(ii)) is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(ii) designate a named fiduciary (other 
                        than an employer in the plan) to be responsible 
                        for collecting contributions to the plan and 
                        require such fiduciary to implement written 
                        contribution collection procedures that are 
                        reasonable, diligent, and systematic;''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1046 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1046

To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind the counter 
                            in retail sales.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2001

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind the counter 
                            in retail sales.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETAIL SALES OF CIGARETTE PRODUCTS.

    (a) Product Placement.--Any person engaged in the retail sales of 
cigarette products shall place such products under or behind a counter 
and not out on the floor of the retail sales facility.
    (b) Penalty.--A person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
considered to have engaged in a deceptive act or practice in violation 
of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                            SUMMARY OF BASE SALARIES
                                       FOR
                 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION

     For services rendered during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the
executive officers of Park National Corporation ("Park") received the following
base salaries:

     -    C. Daniel DeLawder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Park and
          The Park National Bank ("Park National Bank") - $318,750

     -    David L. Trautman, Secretary of Park and Executive Vice President of
          Park National Bank - $210,577

     -    John W. Kozak, Chief Financial Officer of Park and Senior Vice
          President and Chief Financial Officer of Park National Bank - $152,500

     On January 18, 2005, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the
Board of Directors approved the following base salaries for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005 (the "2005 fiscal year") for the executive officers of
Park:

     -    C. Daniel DeLawder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
          of Park and Park National Bank - $464,240

     -    David L. Trautman, President and Secretary of Park and President of
          Park National Bank - $307,108

     -    John W. Kozak, Chief Financial Officer of Park and Senior Vice
          President and Chief Financial Officer of Park National Bank - $200,500

The Compensation Committee also recommended to the Board of Directors that the
cash compensation paid to the three executive officers of Park during the 2005
fiscal year be split at 50% base salary and 50% incentive compensation. Messrs.
DeLawder, Trautman and Kozak historically have received the majority of their
total cash compensation in incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee
reviewed independently generated peer group information of similarly sized bank
holding companies developed by SNL Securities which revealed that people holding
their positions typically receive a majority of their cash compensation in base
salary. To be more consistent with peers, and at management's suggestion, the
Compensation Committee considered and then approved a 50/50 split between base
salary and cash incentive compensation. Management also suggested that Messrs.
DeLawder and Trautman receive no increase in the aggregate amount of cash
compensation paid to them during the 2005 fiscal year, but that the proportion
of total cash compensation allocated to base salary for the 2005 fiscal year and
incentive compensation in respect of Park's performance for the 2004 fiscal year
should change. Management suggested, and the Compensation Committee concurred
after reviewing peer data, to increase Mr. Kozak's total cash compensation.
Accordingly, the base salaries for the 2005 fiscal year will be those shown
above.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 123 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 123

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2002

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-229 is 
further amended by striking

the date specified in section 107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof 
``November 22, 2002''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```