alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.a  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Report on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.  Dated: August 13, 2007/s/Edward Munden
Edward Munden
Chairman of the Board   The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 23
                                                                ----------


                    Independent Auditors' Consent
                    -----------------------------



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Citizens Communications Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (No.
33-52873) on Form S-3, in the Registration Statement (No. 33-63615) on Form S-3,
in the Registration  Statement (No.  333-58044) on Form S-3, in the Registration
Statement  (No.  333-91054)  on Form S-8,  in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-61432) on Form S-8, in the  Registration  Statement (No.  333-71821) on Form
S-8,  in  the  Registration  Statement  (No.  333-71597)  on  Form  S-8,  in the
Registration  Statement  (No.  333-71029)  on  Form  S-8,  in  the  Registration
Statement  (No.  33-42972)  on Form  S-8,  in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
33-48683) on Form S-8, in the Registration Statement (No. 333-69740) on Form S-4
of Citizens  Communications  Company and subsidiaries of our reports dated March
4,  2003,  with  respect  to  the   consolidated   balance  sheets  of  Citizens
Communications  Company and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the  related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,   shareholders'  equity,
comprehensive  income  (loss)  and  cash  flows  for  each of the  years  in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related  financial  statement
schedule,  which reports appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form
10-K of Citizens  Communications Company and subsidiaries.  Our report refers to
the adoption of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standard No. 142,  "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets" as of January 1, 2002.



                                                        KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 21, 2003
# Average Nearest Neighbor Summary

| Nearest Neighbor Ratio: | 0.725286 |  |
|-------------------------|----------|--|
| -6.218365               |          |
| 0.000000                |          |

Given the z-score of -6.22, there is a less than 1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance.

| Observed Mean Distance: | 872.525664 US_Feet |
|-------------------------|--------------------|
| 1203.009676 US_Feet     |
| 0.725286                |
| -6.218365               |
| 0.000000                |

| Input Feature Class: | DayTime459R_07 |
|----------------------|----------------|
| EUCLIDEAN            |
| 810450077.659163     |
| False                |
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50127 C onfer enc e C al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. O C TA V I O R O JA S- R O D R I G U E Z , al so know n as Juan M ar t i nez, al so know n as O ct avio R oj as, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 5 : 0 8
- CR- 6 5 3
- ALL B e fo r e K IN G , J O L L Y , a n d S O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * O c t avi o Roj as - R odr i guez pl eade d g uil t ywi t ho utap l e aa g r e e m e ntt o il l egal r ee nt r y af

t erdepo r t at i on i n vi ol at i on of 8 U . S. C . § 1326 and w as s ent enc ed t o 4 1 m on t h s of

i m pri sonm en tan d t h ree yea rs of su pervi sed rel ease. R oj as- R odri gu ez ar gues t hatt he w i t hi n- gui del i nes s ent enc e i m pos ed byt he di st r i c tc our tw as unreas onabl e bec ause i t w as gr eat er t han nec es sa r y t o m ee t t he goal s of 18 U . S. C . § 3553( a) . H e ar gues t hat t he i l l egal r ee nt r y G ui del i ne, U . S. S. G . § 2L1. 2, United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 50127

2 bydo ubl e c ou n t i n g h i s pri or c on vi ct i on , si gn i f i can t l y overst ated his dan ger t o t he c om m u ni t y and hi s r i sk of r ec i di vi sm and fai l ed t o a c c ountf ort he r el at i ve seri ou sness of

t h e of fen se. R oj as- R odri gu ez di d n o t m ak e t h i s obj ect i on or a r g u m e n t in th e d is tr ic t c o u r t, a n d s o w e re v ie w fo rp la in e r r o r . SeePu c ke t tv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 1 2 9 S . C t. 1 4 2 3 , 1 4 2 8 -2 9 (2 0 0 9 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. Pel t i er , 505 F . 3d 3 8 9 , 3 9 1 -9 2 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 7 ). R oj as - R odr i guez ’ s ar gum entt hathi s advi so r y gui deli n es r ange w as gr eat ert han nece ss ar y t o m ee t§ 3553( a) ’ s goa l s as a r es ul tof “ doubl e c ount i ng” h a s b e e n reje c te d b yth is co u r t. S ee Un itedS ta tes v. D u a rte , 569 F. 3d 528, 529- 31 (5t h C i r. ) (rej ect i n g argu m en tt h at t h e factt h at § 2L 1 .2 fact ors i n pri or c o n v ic tio n s fo ro ffe n s e le v e l a n d cr im in a l h is to r yre s u lts in u nju s t d o u b le c o u n tin gth a t re n d ers se n ten ce u n re a s o n a b le ), cer t . den i ed , 1 3 0 S . C t. 3 7 8 (20 0 9 ). R oj as- R odri gu ez’ s w i t h i n - gu i del i n es s en t en ce i s af f orded a p resu m pti on of r e a s o n a b le n e s s . S ee R i t a v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 551 U . S . 338 , 347 ( 2 0 0 7 ). R oj asRodr i gue z has no tr e but t e d t hatpr e s um pt i o n. See D u a rte , 569 F. 3d at529- 31. H e ha s not show n pl ai n err or. AF F I RMED.
Case 1:05-cv-00170-JD   Document 31   Filed 12/08/06   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the report of Asia Time Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kwong Kai ShunKwong
                Kai ShunChief
                Executive OfficerApril
                29, 2008/s/
                King Wai LinKing
                Wai LinChief
                Financial OfficerApril
                29, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Asia Time Corporation and will be retained by Asia Time Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2 ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS (Dollar amounts in thousands) (Unaudited) Six Months EndedJune 30,
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31,2004 (1)
    
    2003 (1)
    
    2003 (1)
    
    2002 (1)
    
    2001 (1)
    
    2000 (1)
    
    1999 (1)Earnings from operations
    
    $
    72,953
    
    
    $
    60,032
    
    
    $
    106,395
    
    
    $
    107,857
    
    
    $
    101,561
    
    
    $
    118,307
    
    
    $
    139,662Add:Interest expense
    
    
    87,717
    
    
    
    76,774
    
    
    
    174,397
    
    
    
    189,432
    
    
    
    80,359
    
    
    
    83,286
    
    
    
    93,974Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    160,670
    
    
    $
    136,806
    
    
    $
    280,792
    
    
    $
    297,289
    
    
    $
    181,920
    
    
    $
    201,593
    
    
    $
    233,636Combined fixed charges and Preferred Unit distributions:Interest expense
    
    $
    87,717
    
    
    $
    76,774
    
    
    $
    174,397
    
    

    $
    189,432
    
    
    $
    80,359
    
    
    $
    83,286
    
    
    $
    93,974Capitalized interest
    
    
    11,347
    
    
    
    11,528
    
    
    
    26,854
    
    
    
    32,377
    
    
    
    29,186
    
    
    
    37,079
    
    
    
    41,099Total fixed charges
    
    
    99,064
    
    
    
    88,302
    
    
    
    201,251
    
    
    
    221,809
    
    
    
    109,545
    
    
    
    120,365
    
    
    
    135,073Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    8,906
    
    
    
    15,609
    
    
    
    26,153
    
    
    
    34,309
    
    
    
    25,877
    
    
    
    25,340
    
    
    
    23,733Combined fixed charges and Preferred Unit distributions
    
    $
    107,970
    
    
    $
    103,911
    
    
    $
    227,404
    
    
    $
    256,118
    
    
    $
    135,422
    
    
    $
    145,705
    
    
    $
    158,806Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.5
  (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified for all periods presented.
#### Industrial Commission of Ohio *v.*Gotshall.

(No. 24102

Decided October 25, 1933.)

*Mr. John W. Bricher,*attorney general, and *Mr. B. B. Zurmehly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Stanley S. Stewart*and *Mr. John F. Gholley,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the record contains some evidence that the injury to claimant’s decedent aggravated or accelerated the cancerous condition from which decedent died; there being such evidence in the record it was error for the trial court to refuse to give to the jury before argument the special requests to charge dealing with an aggravation of a preexisting condition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

     I, Thomas M. O’Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public Service Electric andGas Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company. 

/s/ Thomas M. O’Flynn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition for Princeton Mining Company at June 30, 
1998 (unaudited) and the Statement of Income for the three month period 
ended June 30, 1998 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              57
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    57
<PP&E>                                          25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       956,334
<OTHER-SE>                                    (946,876)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,057
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,784)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,784)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.00)
        









</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cv-122-PB

William Vickers

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the January 4, 2006

trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to

finalize plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from January 4, 2006 to March 7,

2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00122-PB Document 13 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The December 21, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until February 27, 2006 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 16, 2005

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Alfred T. Rubega, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00122-PB Document 13 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 2
Tantaros v Krechmer

2024 NY Slip Op 31059(U)

March 28, 2024

Supreme Court, New York County

Docket Number: Index No. 650476/2018

Judge: Dakota D. Ramseur

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York

State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official

publication.

This decision has been published at

2024 NY Slip Op 50351(U).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

No.

SEALED DOCUMENTS - Level II

MOTION TO SEAL

NOW COMES Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney for

the District of New Hampshire, and hereby moves that the attached

documents be sealed under Level II. The documents relate to an

administrative inspection warrant. Unsealing the documents prior

to and following the execution of the inspection warrant would

jeopardize the underlying investigation or cause evidence to be

destroyed. 

No brief or memorandum is deemed necessary under the

circumstances.

WHEREFORE, the government respectfully moves that the

aforementioned documents be sealed for one year. 

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

By: /s/ John J. Farley 

John J. Farley

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Pa. Bar # 71242

United States Attorney’s Office

53 Pleasant Street

Concord, New Hampshire 03301

(603) 225-1552

John.Farley@usdoj.gov

DATED: June 3, 2005

Case 1:05-mc-00021-JD Document 3 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Archstone-SmithOperating Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the ”Issuer”),hereby certifies, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the ”PeriodicReport”) of the Issuer for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 whichaccompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.§78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.

 

Date: November 9, 2007

 
|        | /s/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR.                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Charles E. Mueller, Jr., Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 81

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      restoring religious freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2001

Mr. Istook (for himself, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Akin, Mr. Armey, Mr. Baker, 
   Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. 
Barton of Texas, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, 
Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Combest, Mr. Crane, Mrs. Jo Ann 
Davis of Virginia, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. 
 Duncan, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Everett, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Gekas, Mr. Goode, 
Mr. Graham, Mr. Graves, Mr. Grucci, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Hansen, Ms. 
 Hart, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Hulshof, 
Mr. Hunter, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. 
 Kerns, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Largent, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Linder, 
   Mr. Lipinski, Mr. McHugh, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Pence, Mr. 
  Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Pombo, Mr. 
  Rahall, Mr. Riley, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. Shows, Mr. 
    Shuster, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Souder, Mr. Stearns, Mr. 
Tancredo, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr. 
Terry, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Watkins of 
Oklahoma, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Weldon of Florida, and Mr. Wicker) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      restoring religious freedom.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the 
dictates of conscience:
    ``Neither the United States nor any State shall establish any 
official religion, but the people's right to pray and to recognize 
their religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions on public property, 
including schools, shall not be infringed.
    ``The United States and the States shall not compose school 
prayers, nor require any person to join in prayer or other religious 
activity.''.
                                 <all>
```
| 001-11001                                | 06-0619596                        |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (Commission File Number)                 | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|                                     |                              |
| 3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut | 06905                             |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)                        |

|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits |
|-----------|-----------------------------------|

|   | 99.1 | Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on February 16, 2012. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|                               | FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION  |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                               |                                 |
| Date:  February 16, 2012 | By:/s/ Susana D’Emic           |
|                               | Susana D’Emic                  |
|                               | Senior Vice President and Controller |
|                               |                                 |
|                               |                                 |
#### Bryant *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24578

Decided February 14, 1934.)

*Mr. Frank K. Bowman*and *Mr. Ghauncey D. Pichel,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Louis J. Schneider,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Edward Sirasser*and *Mr. Simon Leis,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, O. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.