alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: January 23, 2007

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                                   President


























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




     Date: January 23, 2007

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.5

Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act

|I, Thomas M. OFlynn, certify that:
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|2.                                 
|                                   
|3.                                 
|                                   
|4.                                 
|                                   
|5.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|6.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   

|Date: |  | August 1, 2008 |  | /s/ Thomas M. OFlynn                  
|----- |  | -------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | Thomas M. OFlynn                      
|      |  |                |  | Public Service Electric and Gas Company
|      |  |                |  | Chief Financial Officer                

---
Unassociated Document




Exhibit
10.1




CONSULTING
AGREEMENT




This
Consulting Agreement dated March 11, 2005 (“Agreement”) is by and between, ERHC
ENERGY INC., a Colorado corporation (“Company”) and THOMAS C. PRITCHARD, an
individual (“Consultant”).




W I T N E S S E T H:




WHEREAS,
Consultant desires to provide certain consulting services to the Company;
and




WHEREAS,
the Company and Consultant desire to set forth in writing the terms and
conditions of their agreement;




NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants,
agreements, and considerations herein contained, the parties hereto agree as
follows:




1. Engagement. Subject
to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the Company hereby affirms the
engagement of Consultant, as an independent contractor, to provide general legal
services.




2. Compensation. For
legal services performed by Consultant for the Company, the Company will issue
to Consultant 150,000 shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to a S-8
Registration Statement, which shares are valued at $87,000 based upon the
average of the high and low prices for a
share of Company
common stock on March 10, 2005, or $0.58, as reported on the OTC Bulletin
Board.

 

3. Status
Reports. At the
Company’s written request, Consultant shall prepare and submit to the Company a
written status report describing the status of any sales of the Company Common
Stock sold hereby.




4. Term. The
term of this Agreement shall commence on the date herein and shall continue in
full force and effect for a period of six months.




5. Miscellaneous.




(a) Assignment. All of
the terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and
shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their
respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement shall not be
assigned or transferred by either party, nor shall any interest herein be
assigned, transferred, pledged or hypothecated by either party without the prior
written consent of the other party.




(b) Applicable
Law. This
Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of Texas.





























(c) Entire
Agreement, Amendments and Waivers. This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto and expressly
supersedes all prior and contemporaneous understandings and commitments, whether
written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof. No variations,
modifications, changes or extensions of this Agreement or any other terms hereof
shall be binding upon any party hereto unless set forth in a document duly
executed by such party or an authorized agent or such party. 




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first written above.

 

 


	 	ERHC
      ENERGY INC.
      


      By:
      //s//
      ALI MEMON  

      


      


      CONSULTANT

      


      


      By:
      //s// THOMAS C. PRITCHARD

      Thomas
      C. Pritchard
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 23 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 23

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               allow an item veto of appropriation bills.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2001

Mr. English (for himself, Mr. Luther, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
 Holden, Mr. Goode, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Flake, Mr. Kolbe, 
  Mr. Goss, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Royce, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   Stearns, Mr. Camp, and Mr. Oxley) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               allow an item veto of appropriation bills.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The President may disapprove any item of appropriation in any 
bill. If any bill is approved by the President, any item of 
appropriation contained therein which is not disapproved shall become 
law. The President shall return with his objections any item of 
appropriation disapproved to the House in which the bill containing 
such item originated. The Congress may, in the manner prescribed under 
section 7 of article I for bills disapproved by the President, 
reconsider any item disapproved under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2277-023]


Union Electric Company, dba AmerenUE; Notice of Site Visit

September 3, 2008.
    On September 18, 2008, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 
staff, together with representatives of AmerenUE (the applicant) and 
the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, will conduct a site visit 
of the Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project and a tour of Johnson's Shut-
Ins State Park. The purposes of the one-day site visit and tour are to 
allow FERC staff working on the relicensing to (a) examine the project 
and its setting, including the adjacent Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park, 
and (b) weigh the scope of the applicant's proposed studies and 
additional study requests filed in response to the Commission's public 
notice issued July 2, 2008.
    The site visit for the Taum Sauk Project will begin at 8 a.m. 
(CDT), with participants meeting at the gate to the Taum Sauk Plant. 
The tour of Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park will begin at 2 p.m. 
Participants planning to attend the tour of the park should meet at the 
project office located in Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park at the Goggins 
Mountain trailhead. All interested individuals, organizations, and 
agencies are invited to attend one or both of the site visits. All 
participants are responsible for their own transportation to the 
project and park, as well as throughout the day. Anyone with questions 
about the site visit should contact Allan Creamer of the FERC at (202) 
502-8365. Anyone wishing to attend the site visit for the Taum Sauk 
Project should contact Mr. Michael Lobbig of AmerenUE at (314) 957-3427 
to make the necessary arrangements for access to the project site.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20864 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6991
JERRY LEE WINSLOW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. W. ARMENTROUT, Warden; T. EVANS, CIRC/LL Clerk, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00727-jlk-mf) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Lee Winslow, Appellant Pro Se. Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Winslow appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Winslow v. Armentrout , No. 7:05-cv-00727-jlk-mf (W.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the
"Report") of All American Pet Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the
year ended December 31, 2006, the undersigned Barry Schwartz, the
President; Chief Executive Officer; Director, Principal Accounting
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

   (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated:  July 17, 2007

                              /s/ Barry Schwartz
                              ------------------------------------------
                              Barry Schwartz, President; Chief Executive
                              Officer; Director, Principal Accounting
                              Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
----------------------------------
Laurence A. Schiffer
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)         August 11, 2006


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
 Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the
 Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Travelers Indemnity Company
Address:   One Tower Square
           Hartford, Connecticut 06183

Form 13F File Number:              28-4686

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Marla Berman Lewitus
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7338

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Marla Berman Lewitus        New York, New York        August 16, 1999
------------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 108 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 108

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 guarantee the right to use and recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the 
                      Flag and the national motto.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2002

  Mr. Pickering (for himself, Mr. Pitts, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Hayes, Mr. 
Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, 
Mr. Thune, Mr. Brady of Texas, and Mr. Oxley) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 guarantee the right to use and recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the 
                      Flag and the national motto.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The first article of amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States shall not be construed to prohibit the recitation of 
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, which shall be, `I pledge 
allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the 
Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with 
liberty and justice for all.'.
    ``Section 2. The first article of amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States shall not be construed to prohibit the recitation or 
use of the national motto, which shall be, `In God we trust'.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mrs. Virginia DRAGO, Widow of Joseph Bevinetto, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Oliver DORSEY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17494.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 18, 1940.

Guy J. D’Antonio, of New Orleans, for appellant. '

Appellee unrepresented.

PER CURIAM.

On the 26th day of March, 1929, judgment was rendered in favor of Mrs. Virginia Drago, widow of Joseph Bevinetto, and against Oliver Dorsey in the sum of $3,500, in-the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans which, on appeal to this court, was reduced to $2,500. The defendant condemned by the judgment having failed to respond, a rule was taken against William C. *549J. Harris, surety on the appeal bond on the 24th day of October, 1930, which was made absolute. On June 6th, 1940, suit for revival of this judgment was filed in the Civil District Court, which resulted in a judgment in plaintiff’s favor erroneously running against Oliver Dorsey, the defendant in the original suit. This appeal was prosecuted to this court in order to correct the error in the judgment. There being no dispute or contention about the matter and it appearing that plaintiff is entitled to the correction asked for,

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be reversed insofar as it runs against Oliver Dorsey, and that there now be judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Virginia Drago, widow of Joseph Bevinetto, and now the wife of Joseph M. Lacaze, and against the defendant, William C. J. Harris, reviving the judgment heretofore rendered on November 21st, 1930, and signed on the ISth day of January, 1931, by Honorable E. K. Skinner, Judge of Division “C” of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans; cost of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff and appellant and all other costs to be paid by defendant and appellee.

Judgment corrected.
#### In the Matter of Robert Sommerville, Appellant, v Erie County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of *839Nicole L. and Another, Respondent. (And Two Other Proceedings.)

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly determined that the father’s consent to the adoptions was not required. Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d) provides that consent to adoption shall be required "[o]f the father, whether adult or infant, of a child born out-of-wedlock and placed with the adoptive parents more than six months after birth, but only if such father shall have maintained substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child as manifested by: (i) the payment by the father toward the support of the child of a fair and reasonable sum, according to the father’s means, and either (ii) the father’s visiting the child at least monthly when physically and financially able to do so and not prevented from doing so by the person or authorized agency having lawful custody of the child, or (iii) the father’s regular communication with the child or with the person or agency having the care or custody of the child, when physically and financially unable to visit the child or prevented from doing so by the person or authorized agency having lawful custody of the child.”

The undisputed evidence shows that the father did not maintain substantial and continuous contact with his two children. He made no attempt to visit or communicate with the children or with the agency having care of the children from the time the children were born on August 23, 1983 and November 30, 1985 until September 1987, when he made his first request for visitation.

We reject the father’s contention that the court should have determined the issue under Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) rather than under section 111 (1) (d).

The record supports Family Court’s finding that the adoptions were in the best interests of the children. (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Manz, J.—custody.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.