alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <PAGE>

     <ARTICLE> 5
     <LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMTION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
     OF J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JULY 31, 1999, AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
     </LEGEND>
     <MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

     <S>                             <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
     <PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
     <CASH>                                             377
     <SECURITIES>                                       325
     <RECEIVABLES>                                    4,135
     <ALLOWANCES>                                        96
     <INVENTORY>                                      6,308
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,188
     <PP&E>                                           8,472
     <DEPRECIATION>                                   3,013
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,930
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,323
     <BONDS>                                          6,817
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
     <PREFERRED>                                        457
     <COMMON>                                         3,232
     <OTHER-SE>                                       3,652
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,930
     <SALES>                                         14,292
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,842
     <CGS>                                           10,570
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,943
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   230
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                    35
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 307
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                    327
     <INCOME-TAX>                                       121
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                206
     <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
     <CHANGES>                                            0
     <NET-INCOME>                                       206
     <EPS-BASIC>                                     0.73
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PrecisionCastparts Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Mark Donegan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2005          |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| /s/  Mark Donegan               |   |
| Mark Donegan                         |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Filed 5/16/13 P. v. Wong CA6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. KAR WONG, Defendant and Appellant. H039186 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. C1238968)

After a confrontation with police in front of Eastridge Mall, defendant Kar Wong was charged with one count of assault on a peace officer (Pen. Code. § 245, subd. (c)), and six counts of exhibiting a weapon (chisel) to a peace officer with the intent to resist arrest. (Pen. Code, § 417.8.) During the proceedings, the co urt declared a doubt as to defendant’s competence to stand trial. Defe nse counsel waived ju ry trial and submitted the issue on the two doctors reports which found defendant not co mpetent. The trial

court ordered defendant committed to an un named state hospital, noting that he had consented to the administration of antipsychot ic drugs. The court set a review date for June 11, 2014. This timely notice of appeal ensued. On appeal, we appointed counsel to repres ent defendant in this court. Appointed counsel has filed an opening brief which st ates the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. ( Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 543-544 ( Ben C. ); People v. Taylor (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 304.) In the opening brief, counsel requests2 that we allow defendant the opportunity to submit a brief in propria persona on his own behalf pursuant to Ben C. On February 7, 2013, we no tified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. Th irty days have elapsed and we have received nothing from defendant. The defendant having failed to raise any issue on appeal, we dismiss the appeal as abandoned. ( Ben C. , supra , 40 Cal.4th 529.)

D ISPOSITION The appeal is dismissed as abandoned.

__________ _______________ ____________ RUSHING, P.J.

WE CONCUR:

________________ _________________ PREMO, J.

________________ _________________ ELIA, J.
<PAGE>




                        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                  OF
                     CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                  OF 
                      VESTRO NATURAL FOODS INC.


     It is hereby certified that:

     1.   The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "corporation") is

                         WESTBRAE NATURAL FOODS, INC.

     2.   The certificate of incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended
by striking out Article FIRST thereof and by substituting in lieu of said
Article the following new Article:


                "FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is
                       WESTBRAE NATURAL, INC."


     3.   The amendment of the certificate of incorporation herein certified has
been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Vestro Natural Foods Inc. has caused this certificate
to be signed by B. Allen Lay, its President, and attested by Stephen Schorr, its
Secretary, this 17th day of June, 1997.


                                            /s/ B. Allen Lay           
                                          ---------------------
                                              B. Allen Lay

Attest:

  /s/ Stephen Schorr
-------------------------
Stephen Schorr, Secretary


                                       13
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 93

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2002

  Mr. Shows (for himself, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mrs. Myrick, 
Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, and Mr. Cannon) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of 
the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution or the 
constitution of any State, nor state or federal law, shall be construed 
to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be 
conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1785436
<SECURITIES>                                    169059
<RECEIVABLES>                                   285979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     116885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2600796
<PP&E>                                         3763113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1047916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5327548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1539714
<BONDS>                                        1462945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18257
<OTHER-SE>                                     3344577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5327548
<SALES>                                         185216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1476981
<CGS>                                           157608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   411851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                807572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               37118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 235204
<INCOME-TAX>                                    100000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             135204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    135204
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
#### Mrs. Adele Reggie ZWAN v. Salim KARRE.

No. 909.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1932.

Milner & Porteous, of New Orleans, and Emile A. Carmouche, of Crowley, for appellant.

Percy T. Ogden, of Crowley, for appellee.

MOUTON, J.

For the reasons stated in the case of Mrs. Victoria Aboud Reggie v. Karre (La. App.) 139 So. 532, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with cost.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 04-cr-171-01-PB

Christopher Brown

O R D E R

The defendant has moved to continue the July 6, 2005 trial

in the above case. Defendant cites the need for additional time

to engage in further plea negotiations. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time

to negotiate a plea agreement or properly prepare for trial, the

court will continue the trial from July 6, 2005 to September 7,

2005. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds

pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated

reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a

speedy trial.

Case 1:04-cr-00171-PB Document 18 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 27, 2005 final pretrial conference is continued

until August 25, 2005 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 24, 2005

cc: Laurence Cote, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

Lawrence F.P. Fallon, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:04-cr-00171-PB Document 18 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Buckeye Stages, Inc., *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 24329

Decided December 6, 1933.)

*Mr. Ralph W. Sanborn*and *Mr. James Huffman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. Briclcer,*attorney general, and *Mr. D. II. Armstrong,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the orders of the said Public Utilities Commission of Ohio be, and the same are hereby, reversed for the reason that the same are unlawful and unreasonable. The Public Utilities Commission is required by Section 614-87, General Code, to give at least fifteen days’ notice and an opportunity for a hearing before revoking a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The Public Utilities Commission erred in not admitting evidence offered by Buckeye Stages, Inc., with reference to matters then pending before the commission, in proceedings Nos. 5266, 5679 and 4559, assigned for hearing on April 11, 1933.

It is further ordered that this proceeding be remanded to the Public Utilities Commission for further proceedings according to law.

*Orders reversed cmd cause remanded.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Matthias, Bevts and Zmmekman, JJ., concur.
#### Secor et al. *v.*Fulton, Supt. of Banks.

(No. 24600

Decided February 21, 1934.)

*Messrs. Tyler, Wilson & Bhinefort,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Jolm W. Bricker,*attorney general, *Messrs. Brown é Sanger*and *Mr. Sholto M. Douglas,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
219 La. 488

#### CHATELAIN v. BESNARD.

No. 39978.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 1951.

Carroll Montet, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Guy L. Deano, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The appellant having failed to make an appearance in this court or to file a brief in support of his appeal, the appeal will be dismissed. See Grand Lodge of Louisiana v. Natchitoches Lodge, 215 La. 300, 40 So.2d 472, and cases therein cited; Birdwell v. Birdwell, 217 La. 671, 47 So.2d 41; Myra Hayes v. Petry, 218 La. 730, 50 So.2d 821; Frey v. Ingram, 219 La. 159, 52 So.2d 531.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification

I, Joseph D. Hamilburg, Chairman and Co- Chief Executive Officer of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plymouth
Rubber Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

(b) [Omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 12, 2004             /s/Joseph D. Hamilburg
                             --------------------------------
                                   Joseph D. Hamilburg
                             Chairman and Co-Chief Executive
                                         Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 700 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 700

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ``LARRY'' WALSH SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lawrence M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 700

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.
```
#### RICHARDSON v. CHARLES KIRSCH & CO. et al.

No. 16900.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 12, 1939.

For former opinion, see 189 So. 146.

Wm. Donnaud, of New Orleans, for appellants.

Anna Judge Veters, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The original decree is amended so as to require plaintiff-appellee to pay costs of this appeal and cost of transferring the matter to the Supreme Court and of transferring it back to this court.

The rehearing is refused, but there is reserved to plaintiff-appellee the right to apply for a rehearing on the question of costs of appeal, transfer and re-transfer.
<PAGE> 1

                                  EXHIBIT 3.1

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                      OF

                              PYRAMID OIL COMPANY


     FIRST:  That the name of said Corporation is, and shall be PYRAMID OIL
COMPANY.


     SECOND:  The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act
or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General
Corporation Law of California other than the banking business, the trust
company business or the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated
by the California Corporations Code.


     THIRD:  The principal office for the transaction of the business of the
corporation shall be located at such place or places within the State of
California, as the Board of Directors shall from time to time, determine.


     FOURTH:  This corporation shall have perpetual existence.


     FIFTH:  That the number of directors or trustees shall be five.


     SIXTH:  This corporation is authorized to issue only one class of no par
shares of stock; and the total number of shares which this corporation is
authorized to issue is 10,000,000.


     SEVENTH:  That the amount of said capital stock which has actually been
subscribed is Five (5) Dollars, and the following are the names of the persons
by whom the sum has been subscribed to-wit:

      NAME OF SUBSCRIBER           NUMBER OF SHARES           AMOUNT
      ------------------           ----------------           ------

      G. S. JOHNSON                    ONE SHARE               $1.00
      FRED G. COX                      ONE SHARE               $1.00
      R. K. HOWK                       ONE SHARE               $1.00
      C. J. BOWER                      ONE SHARE               $1.00
      J. B. COTTLE                     ONE SHARE               $1.00





<PAGE> 2

     EIGHTH:

     LIMITATION ON LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND AUTHORITY TO INDEMNIFY AGENTS

     The liability of directors of the corporation for monetary damages shall
be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.

     The corporation is authorized to provide Indemnification of agents (as
defined in Section 317 of the California Corporations Code) through bylaw
provisions, agreements with agents, vote of shareholders or disinterested
directors, or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted
by Section 317 of the California Corporations Code, subject only to the
Applicable limits set forth in Section 204 of the California Corporations Code
with respect to Actions for breach of duty to the corporation and Its
shareholders.