|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Historical Data
  About
  Announcements
 Annual Revision (400 KB PDF) (ASCII)  Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization: The 2011 Annual Revision   The Federal Reserve has revised its index of industrial production (IP) and the related measures of
 capacity and capacity utilization.  Although the revisions affect these data for January 1972 through
 February 2011, the most significant effects are for the period from 2008 through 2010.  Measured from
 fourth quarter to fourth quarter, total IP is now reported to have declined 1.4 percentage points and 1.7
 percentage points more sharply in 2008 and in 2009, respectively, and to have risen 0.5 percentage point
 more rapidly in 2010.  That said, the broad contour of total IP in recent years is similar to previous
 estimates, and the dates of the recent peak (September 2007) and the recent trough (June 2009) are
 unchanged from the earlier estimates.  However, the peak-to-trough decline in total IP, at 17.1 percent, is
 2.0 percentage points larger than previously estimated.  As of February 2011, total IP is now shown to have
 reversed about 55 percent  of its peak-to-trough decline, somewhat less than previously reported.  The revised IP indexes incorporate detailed data from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2009 Annual Survey of
 Manufactures (ASM), which showed a lower level of annual output than had been previously estimated.  In
 addition to the 2009 ASM, data from selected editions of the Census Bureau's 2009 Current Industrial
 Reports and annual data from the U.S. Geological Survey regarding metallic and nonmetallic minerals (except
 fuels) for 2009 were used in the revised estimates.  The monthly estimates of production were updated to
 incorporate late-arriving or revised monthly indicator data (either product data or input data), and they
 also reflect recalculations of seasonal factors.  The revisions show that the rate of capacity utilization for total industry was about 3/4 percentage
 point lower than previously estimated in the fourth quarters of 2008 and 2009, as downward revisions to IP
 were only partly mirrored by downward revisions to estimates of industrial capacity.  In contrast, overall
 capacity utilization in the fourth quarter of 2010, at 76.2 percent, was 0.6 percentage point higher than
 previously reported.  The revised estimates of capacity and capacity utilization incorporate data from the Census Bureau's
 Quarterly Survey of Plant Capacity for the fourth quarter of 2010, which covered the manufacturing sector,
 along with new data on capacity in the energy and mining sectors from the U.S. Geological Survey, the
 Department of Energy, and other organizations.  Results of the Revision  The tables show the summary statistics for the annual revision.  Tables 1A and 1B present the
 monthly, quarterly, and annual average index levels for total IP and for total capacity and utilization for
 January 1981 through February 2011, along with the percentage changes in total IP.  Tables 2 through 4 show
 the revised rates of change in IP from 2006 through 2010 for market groups, industry groups, special
 aggregates, and selected detail.  Table 5 presents the revised rates of change in capacity by industry
 groups for the 2006-10 period.  Tables 2 through 5 also show the differences between the revised and
 previous estimates of the rates of change.  Table 6 contains the revised capacity utilization rates for the
 final quarters of 2007 through 2010 and the differences between the revised and previous estimates.  Table
 7 reports revised semiannual rates of change for industrial production for 2006 through 2010.  Table 8
 contains revised capacity utilization rates for the second and fourth quarters of 2006 through 2010.
 Tables 9A, 9B, 10A, 10B, 11A, and 11B report the revised production, capacity, and utilization series for
 total manufacturing, total industry excluding selected high-technology industries, and manufacturing
 excluding selected high-technology industries.  Table 12 displays the annual proportions in IP by market
 and industry groups for 2003 through 2010.  Table 13 reports revised IP indexes and capacity utilization
 rates for the major market and industry groups for the most recent six months.  Table 14 shows price
 indexes for data networking equipment.  Industrial Production  The changes in total IP were revised down for 2008 and 2009 (table 2), but the overall contour for IP
 during recent years was little changed--moderate gains in 2006 and 2007 are still followed by a steep drop
 in the index in 2008 and in the first half of 2009; the index still shows a solid gain in the second half
 of 2009 and in 2010.[1]  Production by Industry Group  Manufacturing production expanded in 2006 and 2007 before contracting sharply in 2008 and  in the first
 half of 2009; the gain in factory output in the second half of 2009 and in 2010 was nearly equivalent to
 its decline in the first half of 2009.[2]  The drop in 2008 was widespread, as output fell for all major
 manufacturing industries; for most of these industries, the current estimates show steeper declines than
 were  previously reported.  The net decline in manufacturing for 2009 as a whole was also broadly based,
 and the current estimates show larger drops than those reported earlier.  For durable goods industries as a
 whole, output posted a modest gain in 2006 and rose solidly in 2007; the increase over this period was
 revised up on balance.  Durable goods output fell sharply in 2008 and 2009, and those declines are now
 reported to have been even steeper than previously estimated.  For 2010, the production of durable goods
 moved up strongly, and the gain is now reported to have been a little stronger than the previous estimate.
 All major categories of durables posted increases in 2010, and, with only two exceptions (machinery, and
 computer and electronic products), these gains are now reported to have been faster than stated earlier.  Production in nondurable manufacturing industries advanced in 2006 and was little changed in 2007 before
 falling markedly in 2008 and then moving down modestly in the first half of 2009.  Beginning in the second
 half of 2009, the output of nondurables advanced moderately; by the end of 2010, output was about 6 percent
 above the level at its 2009 trough but 9 percent below its 2007 level.  The rates of change in nondurable
 production in 2006 and 2007 are nearly identical to previous reports, while the declines for 2008 and for
 2009 as a whole are now reported to have been more steep.  For the 2008-09 period, the downward revision
 was concentrated in the indexes for chemicals, for apparel and leather, and for textile and product mills.
 The bounceback in the output of nondurables in 2010 is a bit stronger than reported earlier.  The output index for industries not in the scope of manufacturing under the North American Industry
 Classification System (NAICS) (that is, logging and publishing) fell each year from 2006 through 2010.  The
 declines are now reported to have been somewhat smaller in 2006, 2009, and 2010 but notably larger in 2007
 and 2008.   The index for mining moved up strongly in 2006, posted a much smaller gain in 2007, edged down
 in 2008, fell substantially in 2009, and then jumped in 2010.  On net, the revisions to mining output show
 rates of change in 2006 and 2009 that are lower than previously reported and a gain in 2010 that is higher.
 The index for utilities is nearly unchanged from previous estimates, with the exception of 2010, which now
 shows a stronger gain than reported earlier.  The estimates for selected high-technology industries--computers and peripheral equipment, communications
 equipment, and semiconductors and related electronic components--were revised modestly, on net, over the
 2006-10 period (table 3).  Output in the high-technology sector is still reported to have posted robust
 gains in 2006 and 2007, followed by a decline in 2008.  The output of high-technology industries turned up
 in 2009 and advanced further in 2010.  The index for computers and peripheral equipment moved up in each
 year from 2006 through 2010, except in 2008, when it fell slightly.  Relative to earlier estimates,
 production of computers in 2009 is now considerably stronger; revisions in other recent years are, on net,
 positive but much smaller.  The index for communications equipment recorded a strong gain in 2006, but it
 fell substantially in 2007 and slipped more in 2008; the index was little changed in 2009 and advanced in
 2010.  The rates of change for communications equipment are now reported to have been weaker in each year
 from 2006 through 2010.  The output of semiconductors and related electronic components moved up in 2006,
 2007, 2009, and 2010 but moved down in 2008; the gain in 2007 was especially strong.  These revisions over
 the 2006-10 period were fairly small, and the gains in 2009 and 2010 are now tempered relative to earlier
 estimates.  Production by Market Group  The production index for final products and nonindustrial supplies (table 2) posted modest gains in
 2006 and 2007 and then fell markedly in 2008 and 2009 before reversing course in 2010.  The declines in
 2008 and 2009 are steeper than previously reported, and the gain in 2010 is now slightly larger than before.  The production of consumer goods edged higher in 2006 and fell a bit in 2007; it then moved down
 significantly in 2008 and declined further in 2009.  The index moved up in 2010.  Compared with previous
 estimates, output was revised down noticeably in 2008 and 2009; the revisions in other recent years were
 much smaller.  The output of durable consumer goods was little changed, on net, from 2006 through 2007,
 then dropped steeply in 2008 and declined moderately in 2009; it posted a sizable gain in 2010.  Overall
 revisions were small for the 2006-10 period.  Among durable consumer goods, the revised index for
 automotive products declined sharply in 2008, although by less than reported earlier, and the rebound in
 2009 is now larger than before.  The index posted a solid gain in 2010.  The index for appliances,
 furniture, and carpeting registered moderate declines in 2006 and 2007 but then tumbled in 2008 and 2009
 before moving up somewhat last year.  The declines in 2008 and 2009 are now even bigger than reported
 earlier.  The index for consumer nondurables rose modestly in 2006 and then declined in each of the next three years
 before moving up in 2010.  Relative to earlier reports, the declines are now steeper.  The rates of change
 in the index for consumer nondurable non-energy goods display a similar pattern; the index was little
 revised in 2006 and 2007, was revised down in 2008 and 2009, and was revised up in 2010.  The largest
 revision occurred in the production of clothing, which is now shown to have fallen substantially more
 steeply, on net, for 2006 through 2009.  The index for consumer energy products posted gains from 2006
 through 2008 and did so again in 2010, but it was little changed in 2009.  The production of business equipment increased strongly in 2006, rose modestly in 2007, fell sharply in
 2008 and again in 2009, and then moved up significantly in 2010.  Relative to previous estimates, the
 declines in the index were steeper in 2008 and 2009; on net, the revisions to other recent years were
 small.  Among its components, the output index for transit equipment rose solidly in 2006 and 2007 before
 plummeting in 2008; the drop in 2008 was due partly to weakness in the motor vehicle industry and partly to
 a strike at a major aircraft producer in the second half of that year.  Production advanced markedly in
 2009 and 2010, and both estimates--especially the one for 2010--are stronger than reported earlier.  The
 production of information processing equipment expanded in each year from 2006 through 2010, except in
 2008, when it posted a modest decline; on net, the rates of change for this market group were revised down.
 The production of defense and space equipment is now estimated to have risen every year in the 2006-10
 period.  The rates of change are now noticeably stronger in 2007, 2008, and 2010, and they are moderately
 weaker in 2006 and 2009.  The output of construction supplies fell modestly in 2006 and 2007 and declined very steeply in 2008 and
 2009; in 2010, the index recovered some of the heavy losses from earlier years.  Relative to previous
 estimates, the decreases in 2008 and 2009 are now even greater than reported earlier, and the gain in 2010
 is stronger.  The production of business supplies rose modestly in 2006 and 2007, tumbled in 2008 and 2009,
 and then moved up somewhat in 2010.  The revisions in this category were relatively small in most years.  The index for materials posted gains in 2006 and 2007 before falling over the next two years and then
 turning back up again last year.  The revisions to the change in output of materials show larger drops in
 2008 and 2009, and larger gains in 2007 and 2010, than were reported earlier.  Up through 2008, the indexes
 for durable and nondurable materials show similar patterns:  Moderate gains in 2006 and 2007 were followed
 by steep declines in 2008.  In 2009, the output of durable materials continued to contract sharply, but
 then it rebounded strongly in 2010.  The production of nondurable materials was unchanged in 2009 and rose
 moderately in 2010.  Revisions to the indexes for durable and nondurable materials show similar patterns in
 recent years; most notably, the rates of change for both indexes are lower in 2008, and especially in 2009,
 than reported earlier.  The index for energy materials moved up in 2006 and 2007, declined modestly in 2008
 and 2009, and increased sharply in 2010.  On net, revisions over the 2006-10 period were negative.  Capacity  Total industrial capacity edged up in 2008 and then declined noticeably in 2009 and 2010 (table 5);
 capacity was previously estimated to have increased moderately through 2009 and to have edged down in 2010.
 For 2011, capacity is still expected to increase 1.1 percent.  Manufacturing capacity contracted in 2008,
 2009, and 2010, and the rates of change for all three years were revised down between 1 and 2 percentage
 points.  From the fourth quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter of 2010, manufacturing capacity shrank 5.4
 percent; previously, capacity was reported to have decreased 0.8 percent, on net, over this period.  In
 2011, capacity in the manufacturing sector is expected to expand 0.9 percent, slightly stronger than the
 earlier estimate.  Capacity for the selected high-technology industries expanded somewhat more slowly than previously
 reported, on net, through 2010, but an upward revision to the rate of change of this measure for 2011
 leaves the level of capacity in the fourth quarter of this year little different from the earlier estimate.
 In the motor vehicle and parts sector, revisions generally left the level of capacity a little higher in
 recent years than previously reported, though the revised contour of capacity is broadly similar; in
 particular, after declining nearly 12 percent from 2006 through 2010, capacity is expected to turn up and
 increase 2.4 percent in 2011.  Excluding the selected high-technology industries and motor vehicles and
 parts, durable manufacturing capacity fell in each year from 2008 through 2011; the revised contour is
 noticeably weaker than the earlier estimates, in which capacity expanded slightly in 2008, fell less
 rapidly in 2009 and 2010, and was roughly flat in 2011.  Nondurable manufacturing capacity is now estimated
 to have edged down, rather than to have increased, in 2008 and to have contracted more rapidly in 2009 and
 2010; in 2011, capacity is now expected to edge up 0.3 percent rather than advance 1.1 percent.  Capacity at mines expanded from 2007 through 2009 and decreased in 2010; in 2011, the expected increase in
 capacity more than reverses the decline from the previous year.  The gains in 2008 and 2009 are stronger
 than previously published, while the estimates for 2010 now show a decline rather than no change.  Oil and
 gas extraction capacity steadily increased from 2008 through 2011, while mining capacity elsewhere
 decreased in every year except 2011, when a small gain is expected.  Capacity at electric and natural gas
 utilities is still estimated to have increased steadily over the 2008-10 period; a downward revision to the
 rate of change in 2009 is offset by an upward revision in 2010 that leaves the level of capacity in the
 fourth quarter of 2010 essentially unrevised.  In 2011, capacity rises less rapidly than previously
 projected.  By stage of processing, capacity in the crude stage rose in 2008 and 2009 despite a sharp downward
 revision in 2009; the decline in 2010 and subsequent reversal in 2011 are both only slightly weaker than in
 the earlier estimates.  In contrast, capacity at the primary and semifinished stages shrunk more
 substantially in 2009 and 2010 than previously reported, and the small gains in 2008 and 2011 have been
 reduced somewhat.  At the finished stage, capacity is now estimated to have declined in each year from 2008
 through 2010; capacity at this stage was previously estimated to have increased in 2008 and 2010.  In 2011,
 capacity at the finished stage is projected to post a solid increase.  Capacity Utilization  In 2007, the rate of capacity utilization for total industry, at 81.1 percent, was 0.7 percentage
 point above its long-run (1972 through 2010) average of 80.4 percent (table 6).[3]  Utilization rates plunged
 in 2008 and in the first half of 2009, reaching a trough of 67.3 percent in June of that year, before
 increasing steadily through the end of 2010.  Despite these gains, the level in the fourth quarter of 2010,
 at 76.2 percent, was still 4.2 percentage points below its long-run average.  The rate of capacity
 utilization for total industry was revised down about 3/4 percentage point in 2008 and 2009 but was revised
 up 0.6 percentage point in 2010.  In manufacturing, the rate of utilization in 2007 was revised down 0.1 percentage point to 79.0 percent, a
 rate equal to its long-run average.  The factory operating rate was revised down 0.8 percentage point in
 2008 and 1.1 percentage points in 2009.  In particular, the level of the factory operating rate at the June
 2009 trough of the recent recession was revised down 1.0 percentage point to 64.4 percent, the lowest level
 in the history of the series, which begins in 1948.  For 2010, the factory operating rate was revised up
 0.4 percentage point to 73.4 percent.  The rates of capacity utilization for durable manufacturing were
 revised down in each year from 2008 through 2010, while the rates for nondurable manufacturing were revised
 down in 2007 and 2008 but were revised up in 2009 and 2010.  As of the fourth quarter of 2010, most major manufacturing industry groups were operating at rates
 below--and in some cases, far below--their industry-specific long-run averages.  In particular, the
 utilization rates for several industries--textile and product mills, wood products, printing and related
 support activities, and nonmetallic mineral products--were more than 15 percentage points below their
 long-run averages.  The handful of industries that were operating at rates above their long-run averages
 included computers and peripheral equipment, communications equipment, and miscellaneous manufacturing.  Capacity utilization in mining was above its long-run average in 2006 through 2008, fell below its
 long-run average in 2009, and then moved up noticeably in 2010.  Relative to the earlier estimates, the
 utilization rate for overall mining was revised up somewhat in 2007, down a little in 2008, and down more
 noticeably in 2009.  In 2010, the utilization rate for mining stood at 89.1 percent, a rate 0.2 percentage
 point higher than previously reported and 1.7 percentage points above its long-run average.  At electric
 and natural gas utilities, the rate of capacity utilization was revised up in 2009 and 2010 but down a
 little in 2008.  The rate of utilization at electric and natural gas utilities stood at 81.3 percent in
 2010, a rate 5.3 percent below its long-run average of 86.6 percent.  Technical Aspects of the Revision  This revision incorporated new comprehensive data from the 2009 ASM and revised data from the 2008
 ASM for manufacturing production.  Revised price indexes from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) and
 updated price indexes constructed by the Federal Reserve for a few selected industries were also
 incorporated.[4]  In addition, the updated production indexes include revisions to the measures of employment
 and production-worker hours from the Current Employment Statistics monthly survey by the Bureau of Labor
 Statistics.  The benchmark indexes for logging and publishing (included in the IP index for manufacturing
 but no longer included in manufacturing under NAICS) were updated through 2009 based on data from the U.S.
 Forest Service and the Census Bureau.  The revised IP indexes incorporated information from selected Current Industrial Reports for 2010,
 the Quarterly Survey of Plant Capacity for 2010, and other annual industry reports.  The indexes also
 incorporated revised monthly and quarterly source data on production, shipments, and inventories.  Annual Benchmark Output Indexes  The annual benchmark indexes--defined for each six-digit NAICS industry as nominal gross output
 divided by a price index--were updated to include new as well as revised information from the 2008 and 2009
 ASMs.  Industrial production and capacity utilization are structured to follow a single industry
 classification system, currently 2002 NAICS, from 1972 forward.  For the purposes of maintaining a
 consistent benchmark time series, data from the 2007 Economic Census and the 2008 and 2009 ASMs, originally
 classified based on the 2007 NAICS, were transformed to the 2002 NAICS system using data from tables on
 product shipments by industry from the 2002 Economic Census.[5]  The Census Bureau plans to issue bridge
 tables providing a more precise allocation of the data from the 2007 Economic Census into the 2002 NAICS.  Since 2003, the ASM has not included separate data for every six-digit manufacturing industry; data for
 some industries were included only as part of a larger group of industries.  For 2003 through 2006, the IP
 benchmark indexes were calculated by allocating the data from these combined industries to their six-digit
 components based on each component's share of the total in both the 2002 and 2007 Economic Censuses.   Data
 from the 2008 and 2009 ASMs were allocated to the component six-digit industries based on shares solely
 from the 2007 Economic Census.  The deflators for the IP benchmarks primarily reflect industry shipments deflators issued by the BEA in
 December 2010.  Changes to Individual Production and Capacity Series  Very few production indicators were affected by methodological changes in this revision.  Computers  This revision updates the methods used to calculate four IP series for computers (business desktop
 computers, consumer desktop computers, business mobile computers, and consumer mobile computers).  These
 four IP series are all components of NAICS 334111.  The source data for computers come from IDC and measure
 quarterly domestic absorption of computers.  Up through the third quarter of 2009, the Federal Reserve
 received detailed information on the absorption of desktop and mobile computers by businesses and by
 consumers.  Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2009, the Federal Reserve acquired information on
 absorption of only total desktops and total mobiles but did not acquire detailed information on the
 business and consumer components for these platforms.  This revision adopted a new method of calculating the share of total desktops (or mobiles) that
 should be attributed to business absorption and the share that should be attributed to consumer absorption.
 Data from the BEA's national income and product accounts for consumer and business spending on computers
 are used to extend the business and consumer shares of computer output beyond the end of the IDC data.  A
 strong historical relationship exists between the business and consumer splits in the IDC data and the
 ratio of personal consumption expenditures on computers to business expenditures on computers.  Series Switched from Using Product Data to Using Production-Worker Hours  Product data used as an indicator for the output of aluminum foundries (NAICS 331521,4) have been
 discontinued.  This revision replaces the discontinued data with production-worker hours from 2007 to the
 present.  Weights for Aggregation  The IP index is a Fisher index.  The weights for manufacturing industries are derived from value-added
 measures from the Census of Manufactures and the ASM.  The Federal Reserve derives estimates of value added
 for the electric and gas utility industries from annual revenue and expense data issued by other
 organizations.  The weights for aggregation, expressed as value added per unit, were estimated with the
 latest data on producer prices for the period after 2009.  Table 12 shows the annual value-added
 proportions in the IP index from 2003 through 2010.  Revised Quarterly and Monthly Data  This revision incorporates product data that became available or were revised after the regular six-month
 reporting window for monthly IP was closed.  These data were released with too great a lag to be included
 with monthly IP estimates but were available for inclusion in the annual revision.  Revised Seasonal Factors  Seasonal factors for all series were reestimated using data that extend into 2011.  Factors for
 production-worker hours--which adjust for timing, holiday, and monthly seasonal patterns--were updated with
 data through January 2011.  The updated factors for the physical product series, which include adjustments
 for holiday and workday patterns, used data through December 2010 where available.  Seasonal factors for
 unit motor vehicle assemblies have been updated, and projections through June 2011 are on the Board's
 website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/mvsf.htm.  Data Availability and Publication Changes  Files containing the revised data and the text and tables from this release are available on the
 Board's website at www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17, as are updated data for the annual revision and for
 all of the regularly issued series on industrial production, capacity, and capacity utilization.  Further
 information on these revisions is available from the Board's Industrial Output Section (telephone
 202-452-3197).  A document with printed tables of the revised estimates of series shown in the G.17 release is available
 upon request to the Industrial Output Section, Mail Stop 82, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of
 Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.  An expanded version of this release will be published in a forthcoming report that will be available on
 the Board's website.   [1] In this section, all the rates of change for a full year are calculated from the fourth quarter of the
 previous year to the fourth quarter of the reference year.  Rates of change on a  half-year basis are shown
 in table 7.
Return to text [2] Manufacturing consists of those industries in the North American Industry Classification System
 definition of manufacturing, plus those industries--logging and newspaper, periodical, book, and directory
 publishing--that were in the manufacturing sector under the Standard Industrial Classification system.
Return to text [3] Unless otherwise noted, rates of capacity utilization are reported for the fourth quarter of the
 reference year.
Return to text [4] Price indexes for pharmaceuticals (NAICS 325412), for semiconductors (NAICS 334413), and for most
 components of communications equipment (NAICS 3342) are constructed by the Federal Reserve from alternative
 sources.  A table that lists annual and quarterly price indexes for the networking equipment component of
 communications equipment follows the text.
Return to text [5] The 2007 NAICS included about a dozen six-digit manufacturing industries that had different coverage than
 they did in the 2002 NAICS.  One industry included in the 2002 NAICS, Laboratory apparatus and furniture
 manufacturing (NAICS 339111), was eliminated; its various componenets were distributed among seven
 different six-digit industries in the 2007 NAICS.
Return to text     G.17 Revision Release Tables: Chart 1: Total industrial production, capacity, and utilizationChart 2: Manufacturing industrial production, capacity, and utilizationChart 3: Industrial production and capacity utilizationChart 4: Consumer goodsChart 5: Equipment, totalChart 6: Nonindustrial suppliesChart 7: Industrial materialsChart 8: Capacity utilization by stage of processTable 1A: Industrial Production:  TotalTable 1B: Capacity and Utilization: TotalTable 2: Rates of Change in Industrial Production, Market and Industry Group Summary:  2006-10Table 3: Rates of Change in Industrial Production, Special Aggregates and Selected Detail: 2006-10Table 4: Annual Rates of Change for Industrial Production: 2006-10Table 5: Rates of Change in Capacity, By Industry Groups: 2007-11Table 6: Revised and Earlier Capacity Utilization Rates, By Industry GroupsTable 7: Rates of Change in Industrial Production, 2006-100Table 8: Capacity Utilization Rates, By Industry Groups, 2006-10Table 9A: Industrial Production:  ManufacturingTable 9B: Capacity and Utilization:  ManufacturingTable 10A: Industrial Production:  Total Industry Excluding Selected High-Technology IndustriesTable 10B: Capacity and Utilization:  Total Industry Excluding Selected High-Technology IndustriesTable 11A: Industrial Production: Manufacturing Excluding Selected High-Technology IndustriesTable 11B: Capacity and Utilization:  Manufacturing Excluding Selected High-Technology IndustriesTable 12: Annual Proportions in Industrial Production, Market and Industry Group SummaryTable 13: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization SummaryTable 14: Networking Equipment, 1999-2009    Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader