alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Edward
B. Kornfeld, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porta Systems Corp.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
 
 **COMPANY NAME
      CORPORATION**Dated: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Edward B.
    KornfeldEdward B. KornfeldPresident Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6919 

To prohibit the importation of petroleum products from Russia, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Mr. COLE (for himself, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. MOOLENAAR, 

Mr. BOST, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. KELLY of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. 

VAN DREW, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. MANN, and Mr. CARTER of Georgia) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of petroleum products from 

Russia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibition on Imports 

5 of Russian Oil Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6919 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF RUSSIAN PE2 TROLEUM PRODUCTS. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—The President shall prohibit the 

4 importation of all petroleum products (as such term is de5 fined in section 3 of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

6 Act (42 U.S.C. 6202)) originating from Russia into the 

7 customs territory of the United States (as such term is 

8 defined in General Note 2 of the Harmonized Tariff 

9 Schedule). 

10 (b) RELAXATION OF PROHIBITION.—The President 

11 may modify or remove the prohibition under subsection 

12 (a) with respect to some or all petroleum products de13 scribed in such subsection if the President notifies the ap14 propriate congressional committees that, in the determina15 tion of the President, such modification or removal is ap16 propriate given the situation in Ukraine, and includes with 

17 such notification— 

18 (1) an explanation of the rationale for such 

19 modification or removal; and 

20 (2) if the modification does not result in the full 

21 removal of the prohibition, a description of the cri22 teria to be met by Russia for further modification or 

23 removal of remaining elements of the prohibition. 

24 (c) PENALTIES.—The President is authorized to use 

25 appropriate authorities to impose such civil or criminal 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6919 IH

1 penalties as may be necessary to enforce the prohibition 

2 under subsection (a). 

3 (d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.— 

4 For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘appropriate con5 gressional committees’’ means— 

6 (1) the Speaker of the House of Representa7 tives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate; 

8 (2) the Committee on Appropriations, the Com9 mittee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed 

10 Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

11 and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

12 of the House of Representatives; and 

13 (3) the Committee on Appropriations, the Com14 mittee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on 

15 Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Nat16 ural Resources, and the Select Committee on Intel17 ligence of the Senate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.17



 







EXHIBIT 10.17




MASTERCARD INCORPORATED




SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ ANNUAL COMPENSATION




Effective January 1, 2004




	 	 	 	 	 
	RETAINER(1)	 	AMOUNT	 
	Service as a Director
	 	$	45,000	 
	Service as a Committee Chair
	 	$	5,000	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	MEETING FEES	 	AMOUNT	 
	Fee for Board Meetings
	 	$	1,500	 
	Fee for Committee Meetings
	 	$	1,000	 
	Fee for Telephonic Meetings
	 	$	500	 







	(1)  	Retainer shall be paid on a quarterly schedule.
#### SMITH v. ATKINS.

No. 7225.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 27, 1948.

Hussey & Smith, of Shreveport, for appellant.

R. J. Newson, of Shreveport, for appel-lee.

HARDY, Judge.

This marks the seventh time this particular matter of litigation has been before this Court or the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana on one ground or another. Citations marking the appearance of the litigation before the appellate courts of the State are as follows: Atkins v. Smith et al., La.App., 21 So.2d 85; Atkins v. Smith (Smith, Intervenor), 204 La. 468, 15 So.2d 855; Atkins v. Smith et al., La.App., 21 So.2d 89; Atkins v. Smith (Smith, Third Opponent) 207 La. 560, 21 So.2d 728; Smith v. Atkins, La.App., 23 So.2d 649; and Smith v. Atkins, 211 La. 369, 30 So.2d 121.

On the occasion of the last appeal to this Court we declined jurisdiction and transferred the appeal to the Supreme Court. Smith v. Atkins, La.App., 23 So. 2d 649. The Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction and rendered judgment. Smith v. Atkins, 211 La. 369, 30 So.2d 121.

Examination of the record, with which we have become exceedingly familiar, discloses the obvious fact that the basis of the claims made by plaintiff, the nature of the relief sought, and the amount of her demands, are identically the same as appeared on our last consideration. In view of this fact, and since we have once before declined jurisdiction, and since the Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction on our transfer of the appeal, we are at a loss to consider on what ground this Court could be considered as having acquired jurisdiction of this appeal.

Plaintiff-appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same was intentionally taken to the wrong court for the purpose of delay. Under the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912 with respect to the transfer of cases, Dart’s Statutes, Section 1427, after finding that a case is within the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, a Court of Appeal is not vested with discretion as to dismissing the appeal. Soniat v. Clesi, 165 La. 426, 115 So. 644.

*385For the reasons assigned the motion to dismiss is refused and it is ordered that this appeal he transferred to the Honorable the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Defendant-appellant is hereby granted a period of sixty days from and after the date upon which this decree becomes final within which to effect the transfer and to perfect her appeal in said Court, failing which action within the time fixed, this appeal is to stand dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1


Frontier Communications
3 High Ridge Park
Stamford, CT 06905



             Frontier Communications Announces Convertible Notes of
            Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises to Become Convertible

Stamford,  Conn.,  September  23,  2008 -- Frontier  Communications  Corporation
(NYSE:FTR) today announced that the 3 1/4%  Convertible  Notes due 2023 and 2005
Series  A 3 1/4%  Convertible  Notes  due 2023 of its  wholly-owned  subsidiary,
Commonwealth  Telephone   Enterprises,   LLC  (formerly  known  as  Commonwealth
Telephone Enterprises,  Inc.), will become convertible during the fiscal quarter
beginning  on October 1, 2008 and ending on December  31,  2008.  As of June 30,
2008 there were $8,537,000 of notes outstanding.


About Frontier Communications Corporation

Frontier  Communications  Corporation  (NYSE:  FTR) is one of the largest  rural
local exchange companies in the country.  More information about the company may
be found at http://www.frontieronline.com/investorrelations.
            ------------------------------------------------



Investor Relations Contact:
---------------------------
David Whitehouse
SVP, Treasurer
203.614.5708
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10369 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v. ERIC DANIEL CORREA

- CAMBRON , Defendant

– Appellant

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 17

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eric Daniel Correa

- Cambron appeals the 46

- month within

- guidelines sentence and three

- year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) . He argues that his sentence violates due process becau se it exceeds t he statutory maximum sentence allowed by § 1326(a). He concedes that the issue of whether his eligibility for a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b) must

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 14, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10369 Document: 00514385698 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2018No. 17

- 10369

2 be alleged in the indictment and proved to a jury is foreclosed by Almendarez

Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). However, he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review because, he argues, subs equent Supreme Court decisions indicate that the Court may reconsider this issue. The Government has moved for summar y affirmance or, alternatively, an extension of time to file a brief. Summary affirmance is appropriate when, among other instances, “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162

- 63 (5th Cir. 1969). In Almendarez

- Torres , the Supreme Court held that , for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alle ged in an indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. 523 U.S. at 239

- 47. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions did not overrule Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007 ). Thus, Correa

- Cambron’s argument is foreclosed. In light of the foregoing, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s

a lternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. Case: 17-10369 Document: 00514385698 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          67,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,644
<PP&E>                                              34
<DEPRECIATION>                                      22
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,226
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,842
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     92
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Citicorp Venture Capital Ltd.
Address:   399 Park Avenue
           New York, New York 10043

Form 13F File Number:              28-1090

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Helene Shavin
Title:     Vice President
Phone:     (212) 559-1132

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Helene Shavin          New York, New York         November 12, 1999
-----------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Annual Revision (458 KB PDF) (ASCII)  Table 4 [1]
 Item
Revised Growth Rates
Difference betweenrevised and earlier rates(percentage points)2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014Total IP
5.6
3.0
2.8
1.9
3.7
-.1
-.3
-.9
-.9
-.4MARKET GROUPConsumer goods
1.2
1.2
-1.4
1.5
2.2
.1
-.3
-3.1
-.9
-.7Durable
8.8
4.4
2.0
5.5
7.0
1.5
-.5
-6.0
-2.1
1.0Nondurable
-.7
.4
-2.2
.6
.9
-.1
-.2
-2.2
-.4
-1.0Business equipment
7.9
5.3
9.9
-.4
4.7
-.3
-.2
2.4
-4.0
-.3Defense and space equipment
7.5
-2.8
1.8
-3.1
-3.2
-.4
.6
-2.9
-5.4
-5.0Construction supplies
3.6
2.3
4.3
2.9
3.9
-.1
-.7
-.3
-1.4
-.3Business supplies
3.5
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.2
.4
-.3
-.5
-.8Materials
8.4
4.2
4.1
3.1
5.1
-.4
-.5
-.4
-.1
.0Non-energy
11.1
4.7
2.8
1.4
2.5
-.5
-.5
-1.9
-1.5
-1.1Energy
4.2
3.4
6.3
5.7
8.7
.0
-.3
1.9
1.8
1.4INDUSTRY GROUPManufacturing[2]
5.9
3.0
2.7
.9
2.5
-.1
-.3
-1.5
-1.7
-1.0Manufacturing (NAICS)
6.5
3.3
2.9
1.1
2.8
-.1
-.4
-1.5
-1.9
-.9Durable manufacturing
10.7
6.2
5.5
1.4
4.1
-.3
-.6
-1.8
-3.1
-1.1Nondurable manufacturing
2.2
.2
.1
.7
1.4
.0
-.1
-1.2
-.5
-.7Other manufacturing (non-NAICS)
-5.3
-2.7
-2.7
-3.3
-5.6
.0
.1
-.7
2.1
-1.1Mining
5.2
5.6
7.5
6.5
10.8
.0
-.5
1.2
1.8
1.8Utilities
3.6
-.2
-2.2
2.5
1.1
.0
.0
.0
.4
-.3     Return to table   Return to table                 Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7071 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the educator 

expense deduction and allow early childhood educators to take the deduction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2022 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Ms. 

NORTON, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. CARBAJAL, 

Mr. SOTO, and Mr. VARGAS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the educator expense deduction and allow early childhood 

educators to take the deduction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expand Education De5 duction for Teachers Act.’’ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7071 IH

1 SEC. 2. EDUCATOR EXPENSE DEDUCTION INCREASED, IN2 CLUDES EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 62 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(2)(D)— 

6 (A) by striking the heading and inserting 

7 ‘‘CERTAIN EXPENSES OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, 

8 ELEMENTARY, AND SECONDARY SCHOOL

9 TEACHERS.’’, and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘not in excess of $250’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘not in excess of $2,000’’, 

12 (2) in subsection (d)(1)(A)— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘kindergarten through 

14 grade 12 teacher’’ and inserting, ‘‘early child15 hood educator, kindergarten through grade 12 

16 teacher’’, and 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘in a school’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘in a school or early childhood education pro19 gram’’, and 

20 (3) by adding at the end of subsection (d)(1) 

21 the following new subparagraph: 

22 ‘‘(C) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION PRO23 GRAM.—For purposes of this paragraph, the term 

24 ‘early childhood education program’ has the meaning 

25 given such term in section 103(8) of the Higher 

26 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1003(8)).’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7071 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to expenses incurred in taxable 

3 years beginning after December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Mrs. Dovie LITTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cyrus J. RICHARDSON et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 5779.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1939.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1939.

Writ of Certiorari Denied May 1, 1939.

Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Gist & Thornton, of Alexandria, for appellees.

HAMITER, Judge.

This is a companion case to cause styled Mrs. Dovie Litton, Individually and as Natural Tutrix, v. Cyrus J. Richardson et al., 188 So. 439, this day decided by us. For the reasons assigned in our opinion therein the judgment appealed from in this cause is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         (1,534)
<SECURITIES>                                 2,204,829
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             964
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (385)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,531,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,390
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                     486,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,531,902
<SALES>                                         16,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               185,048
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               120,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,938
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,938
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>