alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

(In thousands except per share data)



|                                                                 |  |               |        |                   |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------ | ----------------- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------ | 
|                                                                 |  | Third Quarter |        | First Nine Months |  
|                                                                 |  | 2009          |        | 2008              |   | 2009   |  | 2008 |       
|Net Earnings (1)                                                 |  | $             | 16,705 |                   | $ | 10,201 |  | $    | 40,905 |  | $ | 26,033 | 
|Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)                   |  |               | 6,856  |                   |   | 6,846  |  |      | 6,853  |  |   | 6,844  | 
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive |  |               |       |                   |   |       |  |      |       |  |   |       | 
|Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation (3) |  |               | 6,856  |                   |   | 6,846  |  |      | 6,853  |  |   | 6,844  | 
|Net earnings per share:                                          |  |               |        |                   |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|Basic (1 divided by 2)                                           |  | $             | 2.44   |                   | $ | 1.49   |  | $    | 5.97   |  | $ | 3.80   | 
|Diluted (1 divided by 3)                                         |  | $             | 2.44   |                   | $ | 1.49   |  | $    | 5.97   |  | $ | 3.80   |
EXHIBIT 11


                        National Presto Industries, Inc.
                                   Exhibit 11


The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be
exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                                        First Quarter
                                                      ------------------
                                                        2002       2001
                                                      -------     ------
Net Earnings (loss)(1)                                $(2,360)    $1,250
                                                      =======     ======

Weighted average common shares outstanding(2)           6,837      6,878

Common share equivalents relating to stock options         --          1

Adjusted common and common equivalent
                                                      -------     ------
   shares for computation(3)                            6,837      6,879
                                                      =======     ======

Net earnings (loss) per share:
     Basic  (1 divided by 2)                          $ (0.35)    $ 0.18
                                                      =======     ======
     Diluted  (1 divided by 3)                        $ (0.35)    $ 0.18
                                                      =======     ======
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-72,137-29

EX P ARTE F REDERICK DEWAYNE MALONE, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. C-396-W011740- 1128979-G IN THE 396T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM TARRA NT COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Second Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. Malone v. State , No. 02-08-00360- CR (Tex. App. — For t Worth March 1, 2010) ( not desig nated f or publication). Applica

nt filed this application for a wr it of habe as cor

pus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it t o this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. We have previously dismiss ed five subsequent applications in this caus e. S ee T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 4. I t is obvious from the rec ord that Applicant continues to raise g rounds that wer e previously reje cted on the merits or that should have been raised in previous applications.2

We hold that Applicant has abused the writ and filed a friv o l o u s lawsuit. See Ex parte Jones , 97 S.W .3d 586 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E § 498.0045(a- 1). Should Applicant file future habea s applications i n this cause , we wi l l n o t consider the merits of hi s applications unl ess he shows that the fac tual or leg al basis of his g rounds was unavailable in a previou s l y filed application. This applica tion is di smissed. Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Filed: Fe bruar

y 24, 2021 Do not publish
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6679 

To establish a scholarship program for certain individuals who have completed 

at least 2 years of service in the military, emergency medical service, 

police force, or as a teacher’s assistant or firefighter, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To establish a scholarship program for certain individuals 

who have completed at least 2 years of service in the 

military, emergency medical service, police force, or as 

a teacher’s assistant or firefighter, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Scholarship for Serv5 ice: The Building Better Americans Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6679 IH

1 SEC. 2. SCHOLARSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MILITARY, PO2 LICE FORCE, OR AS A FIREFIGHTER. 

3 Part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 

4 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following: 

6 ‘‘Subpart 11—Scholarship for Service Program 

7 ‘‘SEC. 420S. SCHOLARSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MILITARY, 

8 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE, POLICE 

9 FORCE, OR AS A TEACHER’S ASSISTANT OR 

10 FIREFIGHTER. 

11 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE STUDENT.—In this 

12 subpart, the term ‘eligible student’ means a student who 

13 prior to enrolling as an undergraduate in an institution 

14 of higher education— 

15 ‘‘(1) served at least 2 years in the military, 

16 emergency medical service, police force, or as a 

17 teacher’s assistant or firefighter; and 

18 ‘‘(2) submits to the Secretary a certification of 

19 the service described in paragraph (1). 

20 ‘‘(b) GRANTS.— 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—At the election of the eligi22 ble student under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall 

23 award a grant to such eligible student in the amount 

24 equal to the cost of attendance at the institution of 

25 higher education in which such eligible student en26 rolls. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6679 IH

1 ‘‘(2) OPTION OF ELIGIBLE STUDENT.—An eligi2 ble student may elect to receive a grant under para3 graph (1) for any 2 academic years in which such 

4 student is an undergraduate.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The Hartford Fire Ins. Co. *v.*Landsman, Trustee, et al.

(No. 23599

Decided June 15, 1932.)

*Messrs. Schwcm, Schwcm, Thobaben é Read,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Boer, Arnold S Tobias*and *Messrs. Herrick, Hopkins, Stockwell <& Benesch,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Jones, Day, Allen, Kjnkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

      I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the
best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.

                                             /s/ E. James Ferland
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             E. James Ferland
                                             PSEG Power LLC
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             August 1, 2006
#### Charles William LAWRENCE and Richard Lewis Killen, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Dec. 7, 1954.

*272Louis M. Jepeway, Miami, for appellant Charles William Lawrence.

William L. Peters and R. K. Bell, Miami, for appellant Richard Lewis.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and John S. Lloyd, ASst. Atty. Gen., for appfellee.

DREW, Justice.

This is a certiorari proceeding to review an order of the trial court denying each petitioner’s application to be adjudicated insolvent. The record shows each petitioner is aged nineteen and personally wholly unable to pay the costs of appeal although in each instance the family might he able to bear such costs. Disposition of review of this order is governed by Rastralli v. State, Fla. 1954, 76 So.2d 270, holding that the test on inquiry of insolvency is not whether the prisoner’s friends or relatives have the ability or willingness to pay costs but whether the defendant himself has that ability.

The order denying the petitions for adjudication'of insolvency is quashed with directions that an order be entered finding each petitioner to be insolvent within the meaning of Section 924.17, F.S.1951, F.S.A.

Each 'petitioner also made application to the lower court for supersedeas which was denied. Pursuant to Rule 35(e), 30 F.S.A. Supreme Court Rules, we are asked to review this order. The record fails to show any abuse of .discretion in the denial of such application.

ROBERTS, C. J., and SEBRING, and MATHEWS, JJ., concur. .
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20394 Conference Calendar

MOHAMMAD MUNIR ASIF, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice; MELINDA BOZARTH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-1063

-------------------- December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mohammad Munir Asif, Texas prisoner # 678395, challenges the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994). He first contends that because he is challenging the defendants’ failure to release him to mandatory supervision, rather than his actual conviction, Heck does not apply. Heck is implicated by an action attacking the viability of probation or parole proceedings. See McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles , 47 F.3d 158, 160 (5th Cir. 1995).No. 00-20394 -2- Asif also asserts that because Texas courts have routinely overturned similar actions by the Board of Pardons and Paroles, he has met the Heck standard. He has failed to show, however, that his denial of mandatory supervision has been reversed, expunged, declared invalid, or called into question. Consequently, the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED.
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

                          MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS


          All of Registrant's railroad properties are on long-term lease
to Norfolk and Western Railway Company for the fixed, unvarying amount
of $915,000 cash rental per year. The lease also requires that
additional, large amounts be recorded as non-cash rent income.

          With fixed revenue and expenses relatively constant, there is
very little fluctuation in operating results between periods. In
comparing the third quarter of 1999 with the preceding second quarter
1999 and the third quarter of 1998, revenues totaled $229,000, $229,000
and $229,000, respectively. Net income and income available for
distribution was $205,000, $206,000 and $209,000, respectively.


PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

          None



                              SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD




    11/04/99                  Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
      Date                    (Signature)
                              Chairman of the Board



    11/04/99                  Robert A. Hamstead
      Date                    (Signature)
                              Secretary and Treasurer

November 04, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7276 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTWAN ASKIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(1:98-cr-00258-BEL-4; 1:04-cv-02914-BEL)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antwan Askia, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Antwan Askia seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Askia has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant Askia’s

motion to supplement his informal brief, we deny his motion for a

certificate of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 333-32065

                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $2,000,000,000
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series F
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series F
                Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

         Pricing Supplement, dated November 5, 1997 (the "Pricing Supplement")
to Prospectus Supplement, dated October 27, 1997 (the "Prospectus Supplement");
to Prospectus, dated October 27, 1997 (the "Base Prospectus" and collectively
with the Pricing Supplement and the Prospectus Supplement, the "Prospectus")

                              Description of Notes

         The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement
and modify, to the extent applicable, the description of general terms and
provisions of Citicorp's Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series F set forth in the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. Capitalized terms not defined
herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the accompanying
Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:                           6.37% Senior Notes Due November 12,
                                          2002 (the "Notes").

Aggregate
  Principal Amount:                       $5,300,000.00.

Issue Date:                               November 10, 1997.

Stated Maturity Date:                     November 12, 2002.

Interest Rate:                            6.37%.

Interest Commencement Date:               November 10, 1997.

Interest Payment Dates:                   Semi-annually, on the 12th of each May
                                          and November, commencing May 12, 1998,
                                          and at Stated Maturity.

Redemption:                               The Notes are not subject to
                                          redemption prior to the Maturity Date.

Sinking Fund:                             The Notes are not subject to any
                                          sinking fund.


                                        1
<PAGE>

Regular Record Dates:                     The date that is 15 calendar days
                                          prior to the related Interest Payment
                                          Date.

Purchaser:                                Salomon Brothers Inc

Discount:                                 .043%.

Price to Public:                          100.00%.

CUSIP Number:                             17303 LSK 8.


                                        2
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Travelers Insurance Company
Address:   One Tower Square
           Hartford, Connecticut 06183

Form 13F File Number:              28-1299

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Millie Kim
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 816-4952

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Millie Kim              New York, New York      November 12, 1999
--------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MONIQUE ROBINSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 792 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herman Goss, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered April 30, 1985.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metals USA Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert C. McPherson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert C. McPherson, III                     
|                         |  | Robert C. McPherson, III                         
|                         |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.