alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7039 

To provide an exemption from certain criminal provisions for participating 

as a combatant in the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine on 

behalf of Ukraine, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2022 

Mr. MULLIN (for himself and Mrs. SPARTZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide an exemption from certain criminal provisions 

for participating as a combatant in the armed conflict 

between Russia and Ukraine on behalf of Ukraine, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Volunteer Fighters Ex5 emption Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7039 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR PARTICIPATING AS A COMBATANT 

2 IN THE ARMED CONFLICT BETWEEN RUSSIA 

3 AND UKRAINE ON BEHALF OF UKRAINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any violation of a covered provi5 sion committed by a person that involves participating as 

6 a combatant in the armed conflict between Russia and 

7 Ukraine on behalf of Ukraine during the period beginning 

8 February 24, 2022, and ending on the date that is 10 

9 years after the date of enactment of this Act, is deemed 

10 not to be such a violation. 

11 (b) COVERED PROVISION DEFINED.—In this Act, the 

12 term ‘‘covered provision’’ means section 958, 959, or 960 

13 of title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: November 14, 2003                         /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 29, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 0 0666

- CV

Rebecca JO STEVENS,

Appellant

v.

Joseph “ Harry ” SHAFFIELD, III, and Jane Holinka, as Attorney

- in

- Fact for Joseph “ Harry ”

Shaffield, III,

Appellee s

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 553

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This court’s mandate in this appeal issued on February 5, 2019. On March 27, 2019, a

motion for leave to withdraw as attorney of record was filed. The motion is DISMISSED FOR

LACK OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18, 19.

I t is so ORDERED on this 29th day of March, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

A TTESTED TO:

________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |   |                                                                                  |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      April 15, 2009 |   |   | /s/      Daniel D. Correa                                                             |   |
|                      |   |   | Daniel      D. CorreaPrincipal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |
Executive Order 13471

# Further Amendments To Executive Order 13285, President's Council On Service And Civic Participation 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and in order to increase the membership and extend the duration of the President's Council on Service and Civic Participation, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 13285 of January 29, 2003, as amended, is further amended as follows: 

**Section 1.**                     Section 1 is amended by adding at the end of section 1 the following new subsection:  “(c)  To conduct and vote on official business during meetings, the Council must convene a quorum of at least 10 Council members.”                 

**Sec. 2.**                     Section 4(b) is amended to read:  “(b) Unless further extended by the President, this order shall expire on June 30, 2009.”                 

**Sec. 3.**                     Section 4 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:                 

“(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.” 

[FR Doc. E8-20436

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### WASHINGTON v. ROSEN.

No. 16206.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 10, 1936.

Sidney G. Roos, of New Orleans, for appellant.

*474Johnston Armstrong, of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

Wilhelmina Washington, one of a num-her of tenants occupying the second floor of the property No. 2322 Calliope street in the city of New Orleans, brought this suit against M. R. Rosen, her landlord, claiming $267.50 as damages for physical injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the falling of an iron basin which is said to have broken loose from the wall near the rear door of the apartment .she occupied and to have fallen on her left foot, disabling her for a period of eighteen weeks, and thus depriving her of her wages of $3.75 per week which she earned as a washerwoman.

There was judgment below in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $167.50, and defendant has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. The contention of the defendant is that repairs to the sink should have been made by the tenant under the provisions of article 2716 of the Revised Civil Code, which reads in part as follows:

> “The repairs, which must be made at the expense of the tenant, are those which, during the lease, it becomes necessary to make: * * *

> “To windows, shutters, partitions, shop windows, locks and hinges, and everything of that kind, according to the custom of the place.”

The argument is that an iron basin is comprehended within the phrase and “everything of that kind, according to the custom of the place.” We believe this contention to be untenable particularly since there is no showing in the record to the effect that it was customary for tenants to make such repairs. The fact that the plaintiff and the other ' tenants in the building cleaned the sink, as the evidence indicates, does not constitute proof of the custom of the place concerning the repairs as counsel seems to believe.

 The lessee is under no obligation to make repairs other than those required by article 2716, but has the right to do so. Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 139 La. 945, 72 So. 513. He can recover damages resulting from the lessor’s failure to make the repairs. Ciaccio v. Carbajal, 145 La. 869, 83 So. 73. The lessor guarantees the lessee against vices and defects in the thing leased. Article 2695, R.C.C.

The amount allowed by the lower court does not appear excessive, consequently, and, for the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of James M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from (1) an order of disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), dated June 3, 1988 which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 11, *3891988, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the second degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Division of Youth, Title III, for a period of 18 months, and (2) a resettled order of disposition of the same court dated June 6, 1988. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 11, 1988.

Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the resettled order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the resettled order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s argument, the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing established beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant had the necessary intent to cause physical injury to the complainant *(see,*Penal Law § 120.05 [2]; § 110.00; *People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296, 301). Mangano, P. J., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of 
the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 28, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, October 28, 2008, from 9 
a.m. Pacific Time to 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference 
call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, 
please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, 
TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the 
telephone conference call meeting must be made with Dave Coffman. Mr. 
Coffman can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or you can 
contact us at http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-20940 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JACARR J. GREEN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4962 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 31, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Vivian T. Corvo, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
| Subsidiary |                                | Jurisdiction of Formation |
|------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| 1.         | EV Properties GP, LLC               |                      | Delaware |
| 2.         | EV Properties, L.P.                 |                      | Delaware |
| 3.         | EVCG GP, LLC                        |                      | Delaware |
| 4.         | CGAS Properties, L.P.               |                      | Delaware |
| 5.         | EVPP GP, LLC                        |                      | Delaware |
| 6.         | EnerVest Production Partners, Ltd.  |                      | Texas |
| 7.         | EnerVest Cargas, Ltd.               |                      | Texas |
| 8.         | Lower Cargas Operating Company, LLC |                      | Louisiana |

----
#### In the Matter of Morton Miller, Petitioner, against Stockholders and Directors of Renfrew of the Mounted, Inc., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 20, 1956.

*Meyer Schwarts*for petitioner.

*Lawrence E. Bobker*and *David M. Engelson*for respondents.

James B. M. McNally, J.

Motion to nullify the acts and transactions had at the stockholders’ meetings held on December 6, 1955, December 27, 1955 and January 6, 1956 and the directors’ meeting held on January 6, 1956, is denied.

The subject corporation was organized under the Stock Corporation Law on June 19, 1950. The authorized and issued capital stock is 100 shares common stock, no par value. Petitioner owns 5 shares. Prior to the meetings sought to be nullified petitioner was a director and secretary of the corporation. Some time during 1955 the petitioner ceased to be the attorney for the vice-president of the corporation. Petitioner was thereafter requested to resign as an officer and director of the corporation. Upon his refusal to comply with said request, the meetings which are the subject of this application were held. At said meetings 95 of the issued and outstanding shares of stock were represented and approved the actions taken at said meetings.

The by-laws prior to December, 1955 provided for annual meetings on the 15th day of June of each year. Special meetings of the stockholders were callable at any time by a majority of *556the directors or by the president, or at the written request of the owners of not less than one half of the capital stock. The term of office of each of the directors was one year and *“*thereafter until his successor shall be elected. ’ ’

It appears that the first annual meeting of the stockholders was held on June 20, 1950. Directors- were elected at said meeting, of which the petitioner was one. The directors subsequently elected the officials of the company, and petitioner consequently, on June 20, 1950, was elected secretary of the corporation. No meeting of stockholders having intervened between June 20, 1950 and the special meeting of stockholders called for December 6, 1955 for the purpose of electing and replacing the board of directors, the call for the said special meeting was proper and valid and consistent with the provisions of the by-laws pertaining to the election of directors, as well as section 22 of the General Corporation Law relating to the election of directors. (See *People ex rel. Miller*v. *Cummings,*72 N. Y. 433; *Beardsley*v. *Johnson,*121 N. Y. 224, 228; General Corporation Law, § 22.)

The objection to the notice of the meetings held for the purpose of amending the by-laws, predicated upon the inadequacy of the notice in respect of the matters to be considered at said meetings, is without merit. The notices adequately apprised the petitioner of the purpose to amend the by-laws under the facts and circumstances of this case.

Settle order.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of TETRAGENEX  PHARMACEUTICALS,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Neil Martucci, Chief Financial Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        TETRAGENEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


                                        By:    /s/ Neil Martucci
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Neil Martucci
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                        May 14, 2008
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)        December 24, 1996
                                                     -----------------------

                     The CIT Group Holdings, Inc.
                     ----------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


   Delaware               I-1861                    13-2994534
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(state or other          (Commission           (IRS Employer
  jurisdiction of          File Number              Identification No.)
  incorporation


1211 Avenue of the Americas                     copy to:   650 CIT Drive
New York, New York  10036                     Livingston, New Jersey 07039
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code            (212) 536-1211
                                                         -------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


<PAGE>




Item 5.      Other Events.

      On December  24,  1996,  with the consent of the  shareholders  of The CIT
Group Holdings,  Inc. (the  "Corporation"),  The Dai-Ichi  Kangyo Bank,  Limited
("DKB") and CBC Holding  (Delaware) Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Chase
Manhattan  Corporation ("CBC" Holding),  the Corporation paid a special dividend
in the aggregate  amount of $165 million to its  shareholders.  Each shareholder
then  immediately  contributed an aggregate amount equal to the special dividend
to the Corporation as additional paid in capital.  Notwithstanding  this special
dividend  and  subsequent  capital  contribution,  the  Corporation  intends  to
continue to follow a dividend  policy  requiring the payment of dividends by the
Corporation  equal to and not  exceeding  30% of net  operating  earnings of the
Corporation on a quarterly basis.


<PAGE>




                                   SIGNATURES


      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  Report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




                             THE CIT GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
                             -------------------------------------
                                    (Registrant)


                          By /s/ Joseph M. Leone
                             -------------------------------------
                               Joseph M. Leone
                               Executive Vice President and
                               Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  December 24, 1996
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 687 

To amend title 18, United States Code, by increasing the maximum term 

of imprisonment for the offense of rioting, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Mr. BUCK (for himself, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, 

Mrs. HINSON, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

BUDD, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. STEUBE, and Mrs. LESKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, by increasing the 

maximum term of imprisonment for the offense of rioting, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blocking Rioters and 

5 Insurrectionists from our Cities to Keep us Safe Act of 

6 2021’’ or as the ‘‘BRICKS Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 687 IH

1 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR RIOTING INCREASED. 

2 Section 2101(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘five years’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘10 years’’; 

7 (B) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘If 

8 serious bodily injury (as such term is defined in 

9 section 2246) results from the acts committed 

10 in violation of this section or if such acts in11 clude the use, attempted use, or threatened use 

12 of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall 

13 be fined under this title or imprisoned not more 

14 than 25 years, or both; and if death results 

15 from the acts committed in violation of this sec16 tion or if such acts include kidnapping or an at17 tempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an 

18 attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or 

19 an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this 

20 title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for 

21 life, or both.’’; and 

22 (C) by striking ‘‘subparagraph (A), (B), 

23 (C), or (D) of this paragraph’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of this sub25 section’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 687 IH

1 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘subparagraph 

2 (A), (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (1) of subsection 

3 (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) 

4 of subsection (a)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS