alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-054
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 19

Providing for the appointment of Walter E. Massey as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 2001

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. REGULA, and Mr. MATSUI) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Walter E. Massey as a

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Frank A. Shrontz

8 of Washington on May 4, 2000, is filled by the appoint9 ment of Walter E. Massey of Georgia. The appointment
2

•HJ 19 IH

1 is for a term of 6 years and shall take effect on the date

2 of the enactment of this joint resolution.

Æ
#### Katherine Harris, Respondent, v S & P Management Corporation et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed *871on the law without costs, motions granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured when she fell on a floor in a law office and she brought this action against the owner of the building, the company that installed the floor, and the company that cleaned the building. Those defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and Supreme Court denied the motions. We reverse. In support of the motions, defendants submitted the testimony of plaintiff at an examination before trial in which she stated that she did not notice any problem with the floor at the place she fell; she did not see any water on the floor or any other substance, and, although the floor was "wavy”, it was not "wavy” where she fell. Defendants also submitted the testimony of an installer of the floor who inspected it after it was installed and an employee of the cleaning company, both of whom testified that the floor was not defective. In opposition, plaintiff failed to submit evidence that the floor was in a defective or dangerous condition, and thus she did not raise a question of fact for a jury. The fact that a floor may be slippery by reason of its smoothness or polish, in the absence of a negligent application of wax or polish, does not give rise to a cause of action in negligence *(Silver v Brodsky,*112 AD2d 213; *Swartz v Rose,*40 AD2d 1028). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens  Communications Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jerry
Elliott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry Elliott
----------------------
Jerry Elliott
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2003




This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Citizens  Communications  Company and will be retained by Citizens
Communications  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).  

*Date and Time:*                         The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on September 11, 2008, from 10 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                      

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.  

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.  

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:                            ( print page 51479)    

## Open Session  

### A. Approval of Minutes  

    - June 12, 2008

### B. Business Reports  

    - June 30, 2008 Financial Report
    - Report on Insured and Other Obligations
    - Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan

### C. New Business  

    - Annual Performance Plan FY 2009-2010
    - Proposed 2009 and 2010 Budgets
    - Insurance Fund Progress Review and Setting of Premium Range Guidance for 2009

## Closed Session  

    - Report on System Performance

Dated: August 27, 2008.  

Roland E. Smith,  

Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.

[FR Doc. E8-20380 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]  

BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00188-CR

______________________________

MARKEASE DONTRELL MCCARTY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Delta County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6889

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Markease Dontrell McCarty appeals from his adjudication of guilt on three separate counts 

of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and resulting sentence of life imprisonment. McCarty has 

filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.1 He argues that the 

trial court committed reversible error by failing to remove a potential witness from the 

courtroom,and that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to present any evidence in 

his favor.

We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on McCarty’s appeal in cause 

number 06-09-00187-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not 

been shown in this case.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 28, 2010

Date Decided: September 29, 2010

Do Not Publish

 

1McCarty appeals from three convictions for aggravated sexual assault of a child, cause numbers 06-09-00187-CR 

through 06-09-00189-CR.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2651

_____________________________

DUANE PHINEAS ROSHELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

June 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          38,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,751
<PP&E>                                              34
<DEPRECIATION>                                      11
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,005
<BONDS>                                         54,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,226
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,858
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,309
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,179
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,795
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
         

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7771

WINSTON V. AUTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANN EMERY,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-6214

WINSTON V. AUTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICKIE ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-900-5-CT-BO, CA-96-57)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996
2

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston V. Auton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed

the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Auton v. Emery, No. CA-95-900-5-CT-BO, and Auton v.

Robinson, No. CA-96-57 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 1995 and Jan. 26, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Hoffman, Also Known as Edward Hoffmann, Also Known as Edward Roshkowski, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), all rendered June 5, 1989.

*613Ordered that the judgments are affirmed *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONAL
PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                               60,833
<SECURITIES>                                        148,193
<RECEIVABLES>                                        10,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          27,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    247,974
<PP&E>                                               26,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                       13,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      272,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                32,522
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              7,441
<OTHER-SE>                                          232,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        272,367
<SALES>                                              20,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     20,399
<CGS>                                                14,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        14,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       3,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                            461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   2,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          2,848
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.40



</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10702

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONARDO IVAN HERNANDEZ-ESPINOSA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-12-ALL

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonardo Ivan

Hernandez-Espinosa (Hernandez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez

has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s

brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARNOLD PALMER GOLF COMPANY FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JULY 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                           1,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                       705
<INVENTORY>                                      4,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,671
<PP&E>                                           4,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,964
<OTHER-SE>                                     (27,401)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,176
<SALES>                                         13,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,126
<CGS>                                           10,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   154
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.08)


</TABLE>
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                                     Unaudited
                                                  Nine months ended
                                                    September 30   

                                                  1998      1997
<S>                                               <C>       <C>
Source of Cash:
     Net income                                   $621      $622

     Decrease in accounts payable                   (2)       (3) 

          Cash provided from operations           $619      $619


Use of Cash:

     Dividends paid                                619       604

     Increase (decrease) in cash                  $  -      $ 15

</TABLE>


Notes:

     (1)  The foregoing interim financial statements are unaudited but, 
          in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments
          necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations
          for the interim periods.

     (2)  Registrant has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a
          real estate investment trust. As such, the Trust is exempt
          from paying federal corporate income tax on any income that is
          distributed to shareholders. It has been Registrant's policy
          to distribute annually all of its ordinary taxable income.
          Consequently, no provision has been made for federal income
          tax.