alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURVIR SINGH SAMRA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 14-72854 

Agency No. A098-515-911 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Gurvir Singh Samra, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review 

of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72854 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), 

and we deny the petition for review.

The agency found Samra established past persecution, but his presumption 

of a well-founded fear of future persecution was rebutted with evidence that Samra 

could safely and reasonably relocate within India to avoid harm. Substantial 

evidence supports this finding. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(3); Gonzalez-Hernandez 

v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 999 (9th Cir. 2003) (internal relocation finding 

supported even in the face of somewhat contradictory or ambiguous background 

information). We reject Samra’s contentions that the agency’s analysis was 

insufficient. Thus, his asylum claim fails.

In this case, because Samra failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he 

failed to satisfy the standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 

453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Samra’s CAT 

claim because Samra did not demonstrate it is more likely than not he would be 

tortured in India by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government. See 

Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
       ------------------------------------------------------------------
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 ---------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of Photo Control Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                      PHOTO CONTROL CORPORATION

Date: May 11, 2004                    By/s/Curtis R. Jackels
                                      Curtis R. Jackels
                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                      President and Director
                                      (principal executive officer)

                                      By/s/Christopher S. Lausen
                                      Christopher S. Lausen
                                      Treasurer
                                      (principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Photo Control Corporation and will be retained by Photo Control
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.























                                       94
#### Mary R. Saxton, Respondent-Appellant, v Edward Saxton, Appellant-Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered January 29, 1981, which judgment incorporated the terms of an agreement between the parties dated December 12, 1980, (1) the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaFauci, J.H.O.), dated June 2, 1988 as (a) granted that branch of his motion which was for downward modification of maintenance only to the extent of reducing maintenance to $200 per week, and denied that branch of his motion which was for termination of his maintenance obligation upon his retirement, and (b) granted the wife leave to enter a money judgment for maintenance arrears, and (2) the plaintiff wife cross-appeals from so much of the order as granted, in part, that branch of the husband’s motion which was for downward modification of maintenance and denied her cross motion for upward modification of maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*293The parties herein had executed ah agreement in December of 1980 which was subsequently incorporated in, but not merged with, the judgment of divorce. The burden was upon the husband to demonstrate that the continued enforcement of his maintenance obligation would create an "extreme hardship” *(Pintus v Pintus,*104 AD2d 866, 867-868; *see also,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]).

The husband is a printer who had been employed for many years by the same company. When the firm went out of business, he found himself without employment. After futile attempts to gain similar employment, the 64-year-old husband started collecting his pension, and characterized his election to start collecting a pension as his forced retirement.

Under the particular circumstances at bar, we cannot say that the husband did not exhaust all his avenues for obtaining employment for which he was qualified. However, for the most part, the defendant husband found himself without a job through no fault of his own. He made a sufficient showing to justify downward modification of his maintenance obligation from $250 to $200 per week *(see, Battista v Battista,*132 AD2d 639).

We note that the plaintiff wife’s claim that her needs have increased was not substantiated. She submitted no medical evidence and her assertions as to medical expenses were conclusory and speculative.

We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Hooper and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                        Washington, D.C. 20549

                      ___________________________

                               FORM 10-Q

              Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)

                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                   ________________________________

For the Quarter ended  June 30, 1998   Commission File Number  1-5447 


                  PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD

    Pennsylvania                             25-6002536                
(State of Organization)            (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

                       Telephone -(304)926-1124*

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Yes   X        No      

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of the close of the period covered by this
report.

          1,510,000 shares of beneficial interest, without par value.


                      ___________________________

* Notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission
for the registrant may be sent to Robert A. Hamstead, Secretary and
Treasurer, #2 Port Amherst Drive, Charleston, WV 25306.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UTU81172]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease, 
Utah

September 2, 2008.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Title IV of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act (Pub. L. 97-451), Delta Petroleum Corporation timely 
filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease UTU81172 for 
lands in Grand County, Utah, and it was accompanied by all required 
rentals and royalties accruing from April 1, 2008, the date of 
termination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent Hoffman, Deputy State Director, 
Division of Lands and Minerals at (801) 539-4080.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Lessee has agreed to new lease terms for 
rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre and 16\2/3\ percent, 
respectively. The $500 administrative fee for the lease has been paid 
and the lessee has reimbursed the Bureau of Land Management for the 
cost of publishing this notice.
    Having met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as 
set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate 
the lease, effective April 1, 2008, subject to the original terms and 
conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates 
cited above.

Kent Hoffman,
Deputy State Director, Division of Lands and Minerals.
[FR Doc. E8-20696 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2006                       /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                              ---------------------------
                                              David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                              and Controller (serving as
                                              Chief Financial Officer)
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 333-21143

                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $2,000,000,000
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series F
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series F
                Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

         Pricing Supplement, dated October 14, 1998(the "Pricing Supplement") to
Prospectus Supplement, dated October 27, 1997 (the "Prospectus Supplement"); to
Prospectus, dated October 27, 1997 (the "Base Prospectus" and collectively with
the Pricing Supplement and the Prospectus Supplement, the "Prospectus")

                              Description of Notes

         The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement
and modify, to the extent applicable, the description of general terms and
provisions of Citicorp's Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series F set forth in
the Base Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. Capitalized terms not defined
herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Base Prospectus and
Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:         6.25% Subordinated Notes Due October 15, 2013 (the
                        "Notes").
Aggregate
  Principal Amount:     $25,000,000.00.

Price to Public:        100.00%.

Issue Date:             October 28, 1998.

Stated Maturity Date:   October 15, 2013.

Interest Rate:          6.25%.

Interest Payment Dates: Monthly, on the 15th Day of each month, Commencing in
                        November 1998, and at Stated Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:   The first day of the month in which the related Interest
                        Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:            None.

Redemption:             The Notes are subject to redemption, in whole but not in
                        part, at the option of Citicorp, on not more than 60 or
                        less than 30 days' notice, on any Interest Payment Date
                        on or after October 15, 2001, at a redemption price of
                        100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid
                        interest to the redemption date.

Purchaser:              Salomon Smith Barney.

Discount:               2.00%.

Minimum Denomination:   $1,000.

CUSIP Number:           17303 MJA 8.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  May 1, 2013





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





o    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Item 8.01
Other Events




The information set forth in the press release issued by Frontier Communications Corporation on May 1, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, is incorporated herein by reference.




Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)           Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released on May 1, 2013.












SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  May 1, 2013
By:/s/Nancy S. RightsNancy S. RightsSenior Vice President,Deputy General Counseland Secretary
#### Gwenn A. Ramage et al., Respondents, v John Feore, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract to purchase real property, the defendant seller appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered March 24, 1989, which, upon *287an order of the same court entered February 28, 1984, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against him in the principal sum of $33,925. The defendant’s notice of appeal from the order entered February 28, 1989, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Although a motion for summary judgment may be denied upon a showing by the opposing party that evidence needed to oppose the motion is exclusively in possession of the movant *(see,*CPLR 3212 [f]), such a showing must be based upon something more than suspicion or speculation *(see, Denkensohn v Davenport,*130 AD2d 860). The opposition submitted by the defendant, consisting only of his attorney’s affirmation, represents merely that which he suspects he might find if permitted to complete discovery, without any concomitant evidentiary support for that suspicion. The plaintiffs established their entitlement to judgment in their favor, and therefore the court properly granted their motion for summary judgment. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Hooper and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Copeland Companies
Address:   Two Tower Center
           East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816

Form 13F File Number:              28-4682

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Paul S. Feinberg
Title:     Senior Vice President - General Counsel
Phone:     (732) 514-2011

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Paul S. Feinberg        East Brunswick, New Jersey     August 16, 1999
--------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
Exhibit 99

    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pittsburgh & West Virginia
        Railroad (the "Company") on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ending
        June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
        the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned herby certify, pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 10, 2007                /s/ Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
                                       Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
                                       Chairman of the Board



Dated:  August 10, 2007                /s/ Herbert E. Jones, III
                                       Herbert E. Jones, III
                                       President



Dated:  August 10, 2007                /s/ Robert R. McCoy
                                       Robert R. McCoy
                                       Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer