alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1  


FIRST AMENDMENT TO OMNIBUS AGREEMENT  


        This First Amendment to Omnibus Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into this 3rd day of March 2005 and shall be effective as of the Closing Date
(defined below), by and among The Anschutz Corporation, a Kansas corporation ("TAC"), Pacific Energy GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Pacific GP"), Pacific Energy Group LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company ("PEG"), and Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Pacific LP" and, collectively with TAC, Pacific GP and PEG, the "Parties"). 


Recitals  



	A.
	The
Parties entered into that certain Omnibus Agreement, dated July 2002 (the "Agreement").



	B.
	Pacific
GP is a wholly owned subsidiary of PPS Holding Company, a Delaware corporation ("PPS"), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of TAC.



	C.
	TAC,
PPS, and LB Pacific, LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Purchaser"), entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 29, 2004 (the "Purchase
Agreement") pursuant to which PPS has agreed to (i) convert Pacific GP from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited liability company and (ii) sell all of the membership interests
in the resulting limited liability company (the "Pacific GP Interest") to Purchaser.



	D.
	TAC,
PPS, Pacific GP, Pacific LP and Purchaser entered into that certain Ancillary Agreement, dated October 29, 2004 (the "Ancillary Agreement").



	E.
	Pursuant
to the terms of section 2.2 of the Ancillary Agreement, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein effective as of the closing of the sale by PPS of
the Pacific GP Interests to Purchaser pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement (the "Closing Date"). 




In
consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 


Agreement  


        1.     As
of the Closing Date, the provisions of Article II of the Agreement shall be of no further force and effect. 


        2.     Except
for the provisions of the Agreement that are expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force without change. This Amendment may be
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 


[Signature page follows ] 







 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date first above written. 



	 	 	THE ANSCHUTZ CORPORATION
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

    
 Name:

Title:
	

 	
 	

PACIFIC ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

Pacific Energy Partners GP, Inc.

its general partner
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

    
 Name:

Title:
	

 	
 	

PACIFIC ENERGY PARTNERS GP, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

    
 Name:

Title:
	

 	
 	

PACIFIC ENERGY GROUP LLC
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

    
 Name:

Title:




2
Exhibit 99.1


Frontier Communications


3 High Ridge Park


Stamford, CT 06905


203.614.5600


www.frontier.com







Frontier Communications Corporation to Participate in Investor Conference




STAMFORD, Conn. – November 23, 2011 –Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE:FTR) is scheduled to participate in theBank of America Merrill Lynch Leveraged Finance Conference in Orlando, FL.  David Whitehouse, Senior Vice President and Treasurer, is scheduled to present on Thursday, December 1, 2011 at 4:10pm Eastern Time.





A live webcast of the presentation will be available at www.frontier.com on the Investor Relations page under “Webcasts & Presentations.”








About Frontier Communications


Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE: FTR) offers voice, High-Speed Internet, satellite video, wireless Internet data access, data security solutions, bundled offerings, specialized bundles for small businesses and home offices, and advanced business communications for medium and large businesses in 27 states and with approximately 15,250 employees based entirely in the USA.  More information is available at www.frontier.com and www.frontier.com/ir.











INVESTOR CONTACTS:


MEDIA CONTACT:David Whitehouse
Gregory Lundberg

Brigid SmithSVP & Treasurer
Assistant Treasurer, Investor Relations

AVP Corp. Comm.(203) 614-5708
(203) 614-5044

(203) 614-5042david.whitehouse@ftr.com
greg.lundberg@ftr.com

brigid.smith@ftr.com










###
exv10w18



 






Exhibit 10.18




Annex A




SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

AMGEN RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2003)




     Section 2.12 of the Amgen Retirement and Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective as of
January 1, 2003) (the “Plan”) is hereby amended and restated effective June 1, 2004, as follows:




	 	2.12  	“Company” means Amgen Inc., a Delaware corporation and excludes any
disregarded entity pursuant Treasury Regulations section 301.7701-3, unless such
disregarded entity is designated as a Participating Company.




To record this Second Amendment to the Plan as set forth herein, the Company has caused its
Authorized officer to execute this document this 9th day of June, 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AMGEN INC.

 	 
	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Brian McNamee	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 13-4274

________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOHN DOE,

Appellant

________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal Action No. 2-02-cr-00191-001)

District Judge: Honorable Donetta W. Ambrose

________________

Argued January 12, 2015

Before: AMBRO, FUENTES, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

__________________________________

The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellee in the above entitled case 

having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is 

hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. The Opinion 

issued September 2, 2015 is hereby vacated. A new Opinion will be filed. Amendments 

to the Opinion do not alter this Court’s Judgment as initially filed.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: December 9, 2015

cc: Rebecca R. Haywood, Esq.

 Laura S. Irwin, Esq.

 William C. Kaczynski, Esq.
[Cite as State v. Theirauf , 2023

- Ohio

- 3109.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO

,

Appellee,

- vs

-

CASSIE MARIE THIERAUF

,

Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2023

- 04

- 036

D E C I S I O N

9/5/2023

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. 22CR39711

Jesse D. Bowman, for appellant.

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee

.

Per Curiam

.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Cassie Marie Thierauf , the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the

tran script of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common

Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967)

, which (1) indicates that a careful review ofWarren C A 2023

- 04

- 036

- 2

- the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists two potential e rrors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently t o determine

whether the proceed ings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's cons titutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appella nt sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withd raw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER , P.J., M. POWELL and BYRNE

, JJ., concur.Warren C A 2023

- 04

- 036

- 3

-[Cite as State v. Theirauf , 2023

- Ohio

- 3109.]
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 692 

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to provide a 

rule to determine venue for a proceeding for judicial review of certain 

agency actions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Ms. CHENEY (for herself, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. 

PERRY, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. ESTES, Mr. STAUBER, and Mr. JOHNSON of 

Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

to provide a rule to determine venue for a proceeding 

for judicial review of certain agency actions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recognition of Local 

5 Interests in NEPA Decision Making’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 692 IH

1 SEC. 2. VENUE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW. 

2 Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 

3 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 106. VENUE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A proceeding for judicial review 

7 of an agency action when there is an alleged failure to 

8 fulfill the requirements of section 102(2)(C) shall be 

9 brought exclusively in any of the following: 

10 ‘‘(1) A United States district court for a dis11 trict in which the authorized activity is proposed to 

12 be carried out. 

13 ‘‘(2) The United States district court for the 

14 District of Columbia. 

15 ‘‘(b) AGENCY ACTION DEFINED.—The term ‘agency 

16 action’ has the meaning given such term in section 551 

17 of title 5, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1785-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated August 24, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 29, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 24, 2008.

    Calhoun, Duval, Jefferson, Liberty, Putnam, and St. Johns 
Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-20813 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7109 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to require public lodging 

establishments to waive minimum age requirements for members of the 

Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself and Mr. NORCROSS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to require 

public lodging establishments to waive minimum age requirements for members of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hotels for Heroes Act 

5 of 2022’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7109 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MINIMUM AGE REQUIREMENTS IN PUB2 LIC LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS FOR MEM3 BERS OF ARMED FORCES. 

4 (a) WAIVER.—Title VII of the Servicemembers Civil 

5 Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 4021 et seq.) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 708. WAIVER OF MINIMUM AGE REQUIREMENTS IN 

8 PUBLIC LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS. 

9 ‘‘(a) WAIVER.—A public lodging establishment shall 

10 waive any minimum age requirement to obtain accommo11 dation at such establishment for a member of the Armed 

12 Forces who presents a valid identification card issued by 

13 the Armed Force of such member and seeks to obtain ac14 commodation at such establishment while— 

15 ‘‘(1) under military orders (as defined in sec16 tion 305); or 

17 ‘‘(2) on authorized military leave. 

18 ‘‘(b) PENALTY.—Whoever knowingly violates sub19 section (a) shall be fined under title 18, United States 

20 Code. 

21 ‘‘(c) PUBLIC LODGING ESTABLISHMENT DEFINED.— 

22 In this section, the term ‘public lodging establishment’ in23 cludes any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment that 

24 provides lodging to transient guests, other than an estab25 lishment located within a building that contains not more 

26 than five rooms for rent or hire and that is actually occuVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:04 Mar 21, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7109.IH H7109

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7109 IH

1 pied by the proprietor of such establishment as the resi2 dence of such proprietor.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

4 for that Act is amended by inserting after the item relat5 ing to section 707 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 708. Waiver of minimum age requirements in public lodging establishments.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7360

JOSEPH LEE ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LAWRENCEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER; WARDEN CROSS, Warden, Lawrenceville Correctional Center, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-99-1387-AM) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lee Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Lee Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Robinson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Lawrenceville Corr. Ctr. , No. CA-99-1387-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 21, 2000; entered Aug. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  May 6, 2010





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





x      Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))





Item 2.02
Results of Operations and Financial Condition.




On May 6, 2010, the Company issued a press release.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.




The information in this Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.




Item 9.01
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)           Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation released May 6, 2010.

















SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  May 6, 2010
By:/s/ Robert J. LarsonRobert J. LarsonSenior Vice President andChief Accounting Officer
National Presto Industries, Inc.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings

The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be
exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Second Quarter            First Six Months
                                                   --------------            ----------------
                                                 1997          1996          1997        1996
                                                -------       -------      -------      -------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>    
Net Earnings (1)                                $ 2,640       $ 2,236      $ 5,218      $ 4,166
                                                =======       =======      =======      =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding        7,354         7,352        7,354        7,352

Common equivalent shares from the assumed
   exercise of stock options                          5             3            5            3
                                                -------       -------      -------      -------

Adjusted common and common equivalent
   shares for computation (2)                     7,359         7,355        7,359        7,355
                                                =======       =======      =======      =======

Net earnings per common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding (1/2)          $  0.36       $  0.31      $  0.71      $  0.57
                                                =======       =======      =======      =======

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary 

In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). 

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). 

Kuwait 

Lebanon 

Libya 

Qatar 

Saudi Arabia 

Syria 

United Arab Emirates 

Yemen, Republic of 

Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury. 

Dated: August 25, 2008. 

John L. Harrington, 

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. E8-20055 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M