alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; The Role of Human Milk in Infant 
Nutrition and Health.
    Date: October 7, 2008.
    Time: 2 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd, Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1487, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f7e717e717b6d5f727e76733171767731787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f3e313e313b2d1f323e36337131363771383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

    (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 28, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20646 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RAMP SERIES 2006-RS4 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the "Agreement"),  among
Residential Asset Mortgage  Products,  Inc., as depositor,  Residential  Funding
Company, LLC (formerly Residential Funding Corporation), as master servicer, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        UT
<CIK>            0000079732
<NAME>           POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER>      1
   <NAME>        PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,536,400
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         959,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       853,700<F1>
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 712,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,061,900
<COMMON>                                       118,500
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      883,900<F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            743,300
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,745,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           49,500
<PREFERRED>                                     44,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,671,100
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 541,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   67,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    152,900
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,800
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,768,100<F3>
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                7,061,900
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,182,300
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            41,400
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     964,900<F4>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,006,300
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        176,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 176,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       108,300
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,700
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,800
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   64,900
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        98,300
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      195,700<F5>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          33,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.55
<FN>
<F1>Includes $428,700 for Regulatory Assets and $425,000 for Other
Deferred Charges.
<F2>Includes $129,700 reduction for cost of shares of common stock
held in treasury.
<F3>Includes manditorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary
trust.
<F4>Includes Loss from Equity Investments of $8,000.
<F5>Total annualized interest costs for all long-term debt and
manditorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust
outstanding at June 30, 2000.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7017 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3901 MacArthur Blvd, in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Rudy 

Lombard Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2022 

Mr. CARTER of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd, in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd, in New 

6 Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7017 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Rudy Lombard 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Helen HANBURY and Millard Hanbury, her husband, Appellants, v. Finney P. LYNCH and Rosa M. Davidson, Copartners Doing Business as U-Drive Autos, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

Dec. 1, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of abolishment for USDA/FS-13 Geometronics Skills Inventory record system. 

# SUMMARY:

A review of this Privacy Act System of Records has concluded that this system is no longer in effect and obsolete. This system is being abolished from the Forest Service System of Records in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

This notice is effective on September 8, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

For additional information contact the Director of Engineering, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mailstop 1101, Washington, DC 20250-1101. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard W. Sowa, P.E., Director of Engineering, Telephone: (703) 605-4646. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, requires that each agency publish a notice of the existence and character of each new or altered “system of records.” 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(5). This notice identifies and abolishes a Forest Service discontinued and obsolete system of records. The Forest Service is abolishing the following system of records which, upon review, is no longer used and is obsolete: USDA/FS-13 Geometronics Skills Inventory. The records have been destroyed according to the Federal Records Disposal Act of 1943 (44 U.S.C. 366-380) and the Federal Records Act of 1950, and as designated in the Forest Service Records Management Handbook (FSH) 6209.11. 

Dated: August 22, 2008. 

Edward T. Schafer, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8-20685 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RASC SERIES 2006-KS5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.


2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
     Title: Executive Vice President
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2985

___________________________

John M. Kurz,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

v.

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

 ____________

 Submitted: August 18, 2020 

Filed: August 21, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

John Kurz appeals the district court’s1 dismissal, for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, of his suit seeking to enjoin the collection of his unpaid federal income

1The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, late a United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.
taxes. Having carefully reviewed the record and Kurz’s arguments on appeal, we

conclude the court did not err in dismissing the complaint. Kurz’s challenges to the

denials of his post-dismissal motions are not properly before this court because Kurz

did not file a new or amended notice of appeal as to those orders, and we therefore

decline to address them. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii). Accordingly, we affirm,

see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the pending appellate motions.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000079732
<NAME> POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,542,100
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         878,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       904,700<F1>
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 668,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,993,300
<COMMON>                                       118,500
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      828,100<F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            817,700
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,764,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           49,500
<PREFERRED>                                     40,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,654,800
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 497,100
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   40,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        3,700
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    152,000
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,800
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,770,300<F3>
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,993,300
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,018,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           121,100
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,543,200<F4>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,664,300
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        353,700
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 353,700
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       165,200
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,100
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  184,400
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       144,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      192,400<F5>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         275,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.56
<FN>
<F1>Includes $419,400 for Regulatory Assets and $485,300 for Other Deferred
Charges.
<F2>Includes $185,500 reduction for cost of shares of common stock held in
treasury.
<F3>Includes mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust.
<F4>Includes Loss from Equity Investments of $11,100.
<F5>Total annualized interest costs for all long-term debt and mandatorily
redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust outstanding at September
30, 2000.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Citigroup Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 of Citigroup Inc. of our reports dated January 26, 1998 relating to the
consolidated  statement  of  financial  position  of  Travelers  Group Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1997 and 1996,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1997,  which reports are
incorporated by reference or included in the 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1
of Travelers Group Inc. incorporated herein by reference.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
October 8, 1998
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Max A. Coon, Chief Executive Officer of Maxco, Inc.
(the "Company"), and Vincent Shunsky the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2002 (the "Periodic Report"), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
99.1 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

DATED: February 14, 2003
                                               /s/ Max A. Coon
                                               -----------------------
                                               Max A. Coon
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                               /s/ Vincent Shunsky
                                               -----------------------
                                               Vincent Shunsky
                                               Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Byrd, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kepner, J.), rendered August 12, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the *408first degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Delin, J.), of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of due process and a fair trial by being excluded from the courtroom during a portion of a pretrial suppression hearing. While a criminal defendant has an absolute right to be present during all material stages of the trial *(see, People v Ciaccio,*47 NY2d 431, 436), this right may be forfeited if a defendant’s behavior is so disruptive as to impair the orderly and dignified administration of justice *(see,*CPL 260.20; *People v Palermo,*32 NY2d 222, 225). In the case at bar, the record reveals that during the course of the pretrial hearing, the defendant used obscenities, continually interrupted and denigrated the court, engaged in delaying tactics, and refused to proceed with the hearing. The defendant continued these activities despite being warned by the court that if he continued he would be removed. Thus, it was entirely proper for the court to exclude the defendant.

Nor do we find anything improper with the brief stop, detention and subsequent showup identification of the defendant. Showups occurring in close proximity to the scene of a crime and within a relatively short time after the crime are in accordance with proper police procedures *(see, People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234; *People v Henley,*145 AD2d 570; *People v Molina,*140 AD2d 377). The defendant was detained within approximately 20 minutes of the alleged burglary and a few blocks away. The witness was immediately brought to the scene and identified the defendant. Thus, the items recovered from the defendant’s person after his arrest were properly admitted into evidence *(see, People v Brown,*146 AD2d 793).

Furthermore, we find that the prosecutor did not improperly bolster the witness’s prior identification. Since the witness was unable at trial to make an in-court identification of the defendant based upon present recollection, it was proper for the prosecutor to present two police officers to testify as to the witness’s prior identification *(see,*CPL 60.25; *People v Nival,*33 NY2d 391; *People v Hernandez,*154 AD2d 197).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and his *409claim that the sentence was excessive and find them either to be unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2171
CHARLES CRANNELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and PRESIDENT OF M.C.I. TELECOMMUNICATIONS; KAREN CURIA, M.C.I. Security, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-95-680-WMN) Submitted: October 30, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Charles Crannell, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Susan Dailey, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C.; Robert J. Mathias, John Caleb Dougherty, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; J. Hardin Marion, Mary Fran Ebersole, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland; Hillary B. Burchuk, MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee in his civil action alleging breach of contract and negligence claims. We conclude the district court properly found Appellant failed to produce evidence showing his arrest and murder conviction were proximately caused by alleged erroneous billing records. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crannell v. MCI , No. CA-95-680-WMN (D. Md. July 21, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED