alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William J. HoranWilliam J. Horan, Chairman, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: March 5, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,914]


Less Labor, Inc., Hopkinsville, KY, Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on August 21, 2008 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Less 
Labor, Inc., Hopkinsville, Kentucky.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of August 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-20691 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3284-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Texas (FEMA-3284-EM), dated March 14, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 1, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective September 1, 2008. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-20816 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1998
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                       390
<INVENTORY>                                     11,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,397
<PP&E>                                          38,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,432
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,073
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,719
<SALES>                                         32,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,974
<CGS>                                           24,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    34
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,103
<INCOME-TAX>                                       446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.9.4


 


TENTH AMENDMENT OF TRUST AGREEMENT


 


 


THIS TENTH AMENDMENT executed this 16th day of December, 2004, by DST
Systems, Inc., as Settlor.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, DST
Systems, Inc., as Settlor, and Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company, N.A., as
Trustee, executed a Trust Agreement, TUA DST - Incentive Compensation,
#25-368-03, on December 31, 1987, which has been amended from time to time, the
most recent amendment being the Ninth Amendment of Trust Agreement dated
December 11, 2001 (the Trust Agreement, as amended by such amendments, is
herein referred to as the “Amended Trust Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, under
Section 12(a) of said Amended Trust Agreement, Settlor reserved the right at
any time prior to a Control Change Date, as defined in Section 1(f) of said
Amended Trust Agreement, to amend or revoke the same, in whole or in part,
which right Settlor now desires to exercise;


 


WHEREAS, as of
this date, no Control Change Date has occurred;


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
pursuant to the right reserved to Settlor under Section 12(a) thereof, Settlor
does hereby further amend said Amended Trust Agreement as follows, such
amendment to be effective on the date hereof:


 


Section 12(b)(4)
shall be deleted in its entirety and a new Section 12(b)(4) added to read as
follows:


 


(4)           December 31, 2007,
if there has been neither a Control Change Date nor a Solicitation Date;


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Settlor, DST Systems, Inc.,
has hereunto caused this Tenth Amendment of Trust Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  DST SYSTEMS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Kenneth V. Hager

  	
   

  



 





















 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF
AMENDMENT


 


Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company, N.A., does hereby
acknowledge that it is the duly qualified and acting Trustee under the
aforesaid Amended Trust Agreement, that it has received the foregoing executed
by DST Systems, Inc., as Settlor, and that it does hereby acknowledge amendment
of said Amended Trust Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Trustee, Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company, N.A., has caused
these presents to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  MARSHALL & ILSLEY TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Stephanie Napier

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ William Magee
#### Israel Freidus, Appellant, *v.*“John” Mendez, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 11, 1956.

*Ralph E. Freidus*for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It was error to exclude oral testimony as to the rent paid for the housing accommodations in question on the date when residential rents were “ frozen ” by law. Evidence of this nature is admissible when the maximum rent is in dispute. (See *Matter of Haynes*v. *Abrams,*1 A D 2d 583; *Kalwar*v. *McKinnon,*152 F. 2d 263; *Acevedo*v. *Syrian Prot. Church,*1 *1049Misc 2d 66; *Burton*v. *Muolo,*149 N. Y. S. 2d 594.) The paper captioned “ Bequest for Information to Compute Equalization Adjustment ” was properly excluded.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and a new trial ordered in the summary proceeding and counterclaim with $30 costs to landlord to abide the event.

Hart, Arkwright and Browh, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 690 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the maximum penalty 

for mail theft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum penalty for mail theft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring the Safety 

5 of Our Mail Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 690 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR MAIL 

2 THEFT. 

3 Section 1708 of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘not more than five years’’ and in5 serting ‘‘not more than 10 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification

Certifications

I, Herbert E. Jones, III, President, certify that;

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Pittsburgh & West Virginia
   Railroad;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report on Form 10-Q does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report ;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
   and  have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
   to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
   its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
   annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
   to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
   board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
   over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
   registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
   information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
   over financial reporting.




   May 10, 2007

   /s/ Herbert E. Jones, III
   Herbert E. Jones, III
   President
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 70 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 70

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-44 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 107(c) and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``November 16, 2001''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 25, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 70

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     1,595,837
<SECURITIES>                                 343,246
<RECEIVABLES>                                414,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  103,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2,602,298
<PP&E>                                     3,752,139
<DEPRECIATION>                               975,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             5,390,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,861,144
<BONDS>                                    1,434,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      18,257
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,511,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5,390,819
<SALES>                                      688,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,715,255
<CGS>                                        307,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                830,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,535,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            75,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              309,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                 161,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          148,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 148,732
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.09



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [NM-920-08-1310FI; TXNM 106959] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a Petition for Reinstatement of Oil and Gas Lease  TXNM 106959 from the lessee, Sun-West Oil and Gas Inc., for lands in Trinity County,  Texas. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico State Office, at (505) 438-7586. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued that affect the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost for publishing this Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The lessee met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate lease TXNM 106959, effective the date of termination, September 1, 2007, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                 

Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. 

Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Lourdes B. Ortiz, 

Land Law Examiner.

 [FR Doc. E8-2130 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
213 La. 651

#### WHITTEN v. MONKHOUSE.

No. 38539.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1948.

Dickson & Denny, of Shreveport, for applicant.

'Robert J. Newson, of Shreveport, for respondent. ' ‘ .

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The only question at issue in' this case concerns the date from which the interest *419at the rate‘of *5%*shall be allowed on the amount of the judgment rendered by the court of appeal.

The plaintiff sued for $794.00 for an alleged breach of contract of warranty in a deed by which the defendant sold him certain property. The district court rejected the plaintiff’s demand, but on appeal to the court of appeal the judgment was reversed and a judgment was rendered in favor ■ of the plaintiff for $294.00 with legal interest from May 27, 1929. 29 So.2d 800. That is the date on which the warranty deed was delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant applied to this court for a writ of certiorari and review, complaining not only of being condemned to pay the principal sum of $294.00 but also of being condemned to pay interest for so long a period as that for which the interest was allowed by the court of appeal. This court granted the writ of certiorari and review, but expressly limited it to a consideration of the date from which the interest should be allowed. In granting the writ we stated that limitation and stated that in other respects the judgment of the court of appeal was correct.

In his petition to the district court the plaintiff averred that he was entitled to legal interest “from the date of judicial demand”; which date was December 4, 1945. In the prayer of his petition he prayed for interest at *'5%*but did not repeat the date' from which the interest should be computed. The defendant invokes now article 553 of the Code of Practice, which declares that interest shall not be allowed on a judgment for a sum of money unless the interest is expressly claimed. The defendant’s argument is that the claiming of the interest in the prayer of the plaintiff’s petition in this case was not sufficient because he did not state the date from which he claimed the interest. Our opinion is that that part of the prayer of the petition in which the plaintiff claimed interest at' 5% per annum should be read in connection with his allegation that he was entitled to legal interest from the date of judicial demand. Hence we hold that the claim or prayer was for legal interest from the date of judicial demand, and was a sufficient claim to entitle' the plaintiff to the interest from that date; which date was December 4, 1945. The prayer, however, could not justify the allowance of interest from May 27, 1929, or from any other date earlier than the date of judicial demand.

The judgment of the court of appeal is amended by allowing the plaintiff interest on the amount of his judgment, $294.00, at 5% per annum from the date of judicial demand, that is, from December 4, 1945; in other respects the judgment of the court of appeal stands affirmed. The costs incurred in this proceeding in the Supreme Court are to be borne by the plaintiff; all other costs are to be borne by the defendant.