alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006                       /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
1

Real-time Crime Forecasting Challenge: Example Calculation of Prediction Accuracy

Index (PAI) and Prediction Efficiency Index (PEI)

In this example submission, seven cells are forecasted as hot spots.

The forecast submission then is overlaid with the actual call-for-service-counts: 

0 3 2 0 0 1 2 3

1 2 5 1 2 3 0 1 0

0 0 2 3 0 5 4 0 0 1

0 1 2 0 4 4 3 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 0

0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

2 2 2 0 0

1 1 0 0
2

The variables needed for the PAI and PEI calculations are:

• n = is the number of calls-for-service forecasted

• N = the total number of calls-for-service

• a = the forecasted area

• A = the total area

• n* - the maximum obtainable number of calls-for-service for the amount of area forecasted (a).

In this scenario, the variables for the calculations are:

• a = 7

• A = 66

• n = 22 (3+2+5+4+6+0+2)

• N = 81

• n* = 32 (5+5+4+4+4+6+4) [cells outline in bold/green]

Using these variables, the Prediction Accuracy Index (PAI) and Prediction Efficiency Index (PEI) 

calculations and scores are: 

PPAAAA =

nn

NN

aa

AA

=

22

81

7

66

= 2.5608

PPPP ∗ = PP

PP ∗ =

nn

NN

aa

AA

nn ∗

NN

aa

AA

= 2.5608

32

81

7

66

= 2.5608

3.7249 = 0.6875
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 02-14-00386-CR OFFENSE: 49.04

Miguel Ramirez v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Denton

7J/-/5"

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: County Criminal Court No. 2

DATE: 04/30/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR-2013-01449-B

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Miguel Ramirez v. The Stat

STYLE: Texas

e of

Petition

CCA#: l+/m/5^

AP/>£LLAVT\<=> CCA Disposition:.

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

R&Fc/lirV JUDGE:

DATE: /D/MlX'Oir

JUDGE: f?M UmAjL4^~

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 172 (Thursday, September 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1264-001]


Arizona Public Service Company; Notice of Filing

August 27, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 26, 2008, Arizona Public Service Company 
filed an amendment to its proposed revisions to sections 29.2.9 and 
30.2 of its Open Access Transmission Tariff pursuant to section 205 of 
the Federal Power Act, U.S.C. 824d and Part 35 of the Commission's 
regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#45030017060a2b292c2b20163035352a373105232037266b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 4, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-20504 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2006-QS7 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
        Title: Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONAL
PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                          52,977
<SECURITIES>                                   145,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               255,061
<PP&E>                                          26,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,441
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,298
<SALES>                                         69,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,574
<CGS>                                           49,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,466
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99

    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pittsburgh & West Virginia
        Railroad (the "Company") on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ending
        June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned herby certify,
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Dated:  August 11, 2008                 /s/ Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
                                       Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
                                       Chairman of the Board



Dated:  August 11, 2008                 /s/ Herbert E. Jones, III
                                       Herbert E. Jones, III
                                       President



Dated:  August 11, 2008                 /s/ Robert R. McCoy
                                       Robert R. McCoy
                                       Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
Exhibit 11

                          PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES INC.

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                           December 31,
                                                       --------------------
                                                         1997       1996
                                                       ---------  ---------
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income available to common shareholders             $10,204    $ 1,820
                                                       =========  =========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     18,985     18,279

Basic earnings per share                                $   .54    $   .10
                                                       =========  =========


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income available to common shareholders             $10,204    $ 1,820
                                                       =========  =========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     18,985     18,279
  Dilutive impact of options:
    Book value plan options                                 149        157
    Executive incentive stock options                       843        247
                                                       ---------  ---------
                                                         19,977     18,683

Earnings per share, assuming dilution                   $   .51    $   .10
                                                       =========  =========
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of M.R.A.

, H.A.C.A., * From the 220 th District Court

and J.M.J.A., children, of Comanche County,

Trial Court No. FM00722

.

No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 1 61

- C V * November 16 , 20 2 3

* Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we

affirm the order of the trial court.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1443-000]


Noble Great Plains Windpark, LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

August 29, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Noble Great Plains Windpark, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 19, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85c3c0d7c6caebe9ecebe0d6f0f5f5eaf7f1c5e3e0f7e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c3a392e3f3312101512192f090c0c130e083c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20715 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-051
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000080293
<NAME>                        PRIME HOSPITALITY CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              27,045
<SECURITIES>                                         4,831
<RECEIVABLES>                                       28,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    81,061
<PP&E>                                           1,211,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                     137,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,199,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               83,014
<BONDS>                                            405,839
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               558
<OTHER-SE>                                         638,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,199,881
<SALES>                                            140,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   140,641
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      103,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     39,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15,598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 24,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        24,397
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .53


</TABLE>
(July 26, 1990)

#### In the Matter of Synovia G. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Annette S., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Final order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Bruce Kaplan, J.), entered on or about January 10, 1989, which placed appellant’s grandchildren in the custody of petitioner, Commissioner of Social Services, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Commissioner of Social Services charged that respondent smoked marihuana, left her grandchildren with their natural mother, a crack addict, and threatened her daughter with a meat cleaver while the children were present. Roberta Nelson, while working as a homemaker between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., testified at the fact-finding hearing that she witnessed the above events. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.

In view of the above facts the court did not err in finding that the respondent neglected her grandchildren. (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B].) Proof that a caretaker repeatedly misuses a drug is prima facie evidence of neglect. (Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]; *see, Matter of Theresa J.,*158 AD2d 364.) Here, the evidence of respondent’s use of marihuana, leaving the children alone with their mother, a crack user, and chasing the mother with a meat cleaver, was sufficient to support a finding of neglect under the statute. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SUSAN M. PRECIOSE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-2807 RICHARD V. PRECIOSE, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 6, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas Minkoff, Judge. Susan M. Preciose, pro se. No appearance for Richard V. Preciose.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and LUCAS, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.