alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Item | Revised Growth Rates | Difference betweenrevised and earlier rates(percentage points)
|---- | -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|     |                      |                                                               
|3.2  | 2.2                  | 2.7                                                           
|     |                      |                                                               
|     |                     
|2.7  | .6                   | .8                                                            
|.7   | .4                   | 1.8                                                           
|3.4  | .6                   | .4                                                            
|     |                      |                                                               
|7.2  | 9.2                  | 4.5                                                           
|10.4 | -1.5                 | 18.3                                                          
|     |                      |                                                               
|4.7  | 2.4                  | -1.2                                                          
|3.1  | 1.1                  | 1.7                                                           
|     |                      |                                                               
|2.3  | 2.2                  | 3.7                                                           
|4.0  | 2.4                  | 4.6                                                           
|-1.3 | 1.7                  | 1.9                                                           
|     |                      |                                                               
|     |                      |                                                               
|     |                     
|4.0  | 2.5                  | 2.9                                                           
|4.2  | 2.7                  | 3.2                                                           
|5.7  | 4.6                  | 5.0                                                           
|2.5  | .6                   | 1.1                                                           
|-.4  | -1.2                 | -1.3                                                          
|     |                      |                                                               
|-1.5 | 3.0                  | .5                                                            
|2.1  | -.6                  | 3.4                                                           

`[1] The rates of change are calculated as the percent change in the annual averages of not seasonally adjusted industrial production indexes, rather than as the percent change between the fourth quarter of one year and the fourth quarter of the next.
Return to table
[2] See footnote 2 of table 3.`

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 25, 2010
#### LYNN v. STATE. LYNN et al. v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Jan. 22, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1954.

Edward A. Brown, Jr., Malcolm S. H. Kneale and Malcolm Lewis Kneale, Miami, for appellants.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Mark K. Hawes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

These cases were consolidated and tried together. Separate judgments were entered and two appeals were taken by defendants. They urge numerous questions here but few if any of them comply with the rules and some of them have no place in this. Court. The record in each case was about. forty pages, twelve pages of which exemplified the evidence. If the rules had been complied with the entire record would have been less than half .this much. Appellant has also filed.abojit 75 pages of brief in both cases. .We. are convinced that ten pages properly prepared would, have served the purpose better. Much of the brief is devoted, to. assaults on the trial judge and prosecuting attorney for which we find no place 'in the record. Appellants justify this departure from approved professional standards on the -ground that their rights were' -trespassed on at'the' trial. Not a-syllable "of law or logic supports this contention. Dealing in personalities corrects nothing. In fact, it requires diligent searching to find anything that was done in -compliance with correct standards. Appellants appear to he unable to distinguish- between a ground of appeal and a basis to vent the spleen.

Since no error is pointed out the judgment appealed from in both cases must have been correct and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS,'- C. J., TERRELL and DREW, JJ., and SPOTO, Associate Justice, concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

          - [Docket ID: USA-2008-0060] 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice to delete two systems of records. 

      ( print page 52843)    

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army is deleting two systems of records in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

These proposed actions will be effective without further notice on October 14, 2008 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Department of the Army, Records Management and Declassification Agency, Privacy Division, 7701 Telegraph Road, Alexandria, VA 22315. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Vicki Short at (703) 428-6508. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Army systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                 

The Department of the Army proposes to delete two systems of records from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletions are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports. 

Dated: September 3, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## A0027-3 SAFM 

### System name:

Pecuniary Charge Appeal Files (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10002). 

### Reason:

These records are covered under notice A0027-20a DAJA, U.S. Army Claims Service Management Information System (August 1, 2008, 73 FR 44974). 

## A0037-103c SAFM 

### System name:

Validation Files (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10002) 

### Reason:

These records are covered under notice T7340, Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active Component (March 21, 2006, 71 FR 14179). 

[FR Doc. E8-21085 Filed 9-10-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |  |  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Greenlane Holdings, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                          |                                 |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| Date: April 29, 2022 | /s/ NICHOLAS KOVACEVICH |
|                          | Nicholas Kovacevich             |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer         |
|                          | (Principal Executive Officer)   |
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7129 

To prohibit the importation of crude oil from Iran. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mr. ISSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of crude oil from Iran. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF CRUDE OIL 

4 FROM IRAN. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all crude 

6 oil from Iran shall be banned from importation into the 

7 United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6939 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6939

  To prohibit the importation of oil and natural gas from the Russian 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2022

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the importation of oil and natural gas from the Russian 
                              Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS FROM THE 
              RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
President shall take such actions as may be necessary to prohibit the 
importation of oil and natural gas from the Russian Federation.
    (b) Regulations.--The President shall promulgate such regulations 
that may be necessary and appropriate to carry out this section.
    (c) Effective Date; Termination.--This section--
            (1) shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) shall terminate on the date that is 2 years after such 
        date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          88,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,903,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                   856,953
<INVENTORY>                                 15,056,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,003,322
<PP&E>                                      69,794,506
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,228,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,662,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,807,927
<BONDS>                                     40,095,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,424
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,688,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,662,207
<SALES>                                     41,995,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,930,162
<CGS>                                       33,587,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,814,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,335,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,220,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   488,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (732,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (732,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7154 

To require the President to report to Congress on authorities relating to 

the stabilization and reduction of gas prices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2022 

Mr. CAWTHORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the President to report to Congress on authorities 

relating to the stabilization and reduction of gas prices, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘He Did That Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPORT ON AUTHORITIES RELATING TO GAS 

6 PRICES. 

7 Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a reVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:03 Mar 22, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7154.IH H7154

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7154 IH

1 port that identifies existing authorities that the President 

2 may use to help stabilize and reduce gas prices. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.4

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Ralph Izzo, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.





|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph Izzo                         
|Ralph Izzo                             
|Public Service Electric and Gas Company
|Chief Executive Officer                
|August 1, 2008                         











---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 51 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.51

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to 
           the products of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress approves the 
extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to the products 
of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam transmitted by the President to 
the Congress on June 8, 2001.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 23(a)

The Board of Directors
Citicorp:

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  of our report dated  January 16,
1996 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Citicorp and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1995 and 1994,  the related  consolidated  statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1995, and the related  consolidated balance
sheets of Citibank,  N.A. and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, in
the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-14917),  and to the reference to
our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Registration  Statement.  Our report
with respect to these consolidated financial statements, which contains an added
explanatory  paragraph,  is included in the 1995 Citicorp Annual Report and Form
10-K.


                              /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                              ------------------------
                              KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


November 18, 1996
#### ELLIS v. GRIGSBY et al.

No. 5348.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 1, 1937.

H. W. Ayres, of Jonesboro, for appellant.

C. A. Barnétt and Allen Barksdale, both of Ruston, -for appellees. ■

DREW, Judge.

This is a suit for the cancellation of an oil and gas lease.

The lower court rendered judgment in favor of defendants, rejecting plaintiff’s demands. An appeal was taken to this court and the case regularly fixed for trial. On the day of trial a written stipulation, signed by attorneys for both appellant and appellees, was filed in this court in which there is set out that the rentals due under said lease were not paid or deposited on September 19, 1936, in accordance with the terms of said lease, and therefore the question involved on appeal had become moot. It is therefore agreed that the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed. It is so ordered. Costs of appeal to be paid by appellant.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Dorino, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered January 12, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ. concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     UT
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            4,745
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            534
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,506
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             5,978
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                         208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      14,971
<COMMON>                                             2,907
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                1
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                  (429)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       2,479
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   93
<PREFERRED>                                            138
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 6,084
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                      68
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                          68
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          939
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                             70
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        69
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       5,031
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                       14,971
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            1,256
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                    98
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             885
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             983
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                273
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                    (42)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         231
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                82
<NET-INCOME>                                           149
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                              3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          146
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                56
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                               74
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .65
        

</TABLE>