alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker license and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License No.
Port nameLynn L. Wensveen
21714
Great Falls
 Dated: August 18, 2008. Daniel Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. E8-20677 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER>  1
   <NAME> POTOMAC CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,421,068
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         435,014
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       694,352
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               1,248,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,799,164
<COMMON>                                       118,501
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,010,378
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            728,241
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,857,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          141,000
<PREFERRED>                                    125,293
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,727,065
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0<F1>
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 311,600<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  100,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          985
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    161,702      
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,772
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,353,627
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,799,164
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      840,031
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            33,058 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     684,131
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     717,189
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        122,842
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              20,571 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 143,413
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        70,307
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,106 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      8,282
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   64,824 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        98,304 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      126,500<F2>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         142,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.55 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Included on the Balance Sheet in the caption "Short-term debt."
<F2>Total annualized interest costs for all utility long-term debt outstanding
at June 30, 1997.
<F3>No material dilution would occur if all the convertible preferred stock and
debentures were converted into common stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### William E. WATTS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. L. & K. TRANSFER CO., Inc., Defendant and Appellee.

No. 17668.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 31, 1942.

R. A. Dowling, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Wm. A. Green, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

JANVIER, Judge.

The facts of this case are fully stated in .an opinion rendered by us today entitled: Isaac E. Boggs v. L. & K. Transfer Co., Inc., 11 So.2d 262.

,For the reasons given in that case, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it is, affirmed at the cost of plaintiff.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,268,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  733,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,040,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,067,676
<PP&E>                                       5,289,114
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,766,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,036,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,078,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,169,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,036,285
<SALES>                                      2,963,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,963,156
<CGS>                                        2,127,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               571,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                264,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            264,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   264,118
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anselmo Soto, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *People v Soto*(163 AD2d 889 [No. 125] [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—conspiracy, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
#### Rene J. LE BLANC v. Pierre BARRIOS.

No. 4221.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 29, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 24, 1956.

See also 89 So.2d 447.

Simon & Wicker, New Orleans, Guzzetta & LeBlanc, Thibodaux, for appellant.

Deramee & Deramee, Thibodaux, for appellee.

ELLIS, Judge.

This case involves a rule by the plaintiff against the defendant to show cause why .the judgment rendered “in the matter of Rene J. LeBlanc vs. 7775 Pierre Barrios” should not be recognized and executed. The judgment referred to is the one rendered in the boundary suit affirmed this day by this court.

The rule was made absolute and judgment rendered in favor of the Plaintiff, Rene J. LeBlanc, and against the defendant, Pierre Barrios, condemning and ordering the defendant to remove to the boundary line as fixed and shown on the map and survey of J. A. Lovell in red as line B.D.E., which map forms part of the record in the suit of 'Rene J. LeBlanc v. No. 7775 Pierre Barrios and to deliver possession without delay of the land below or South of said line.

From this judgment the defendant appealed devolutively and suspensively.

In view of the fact that the defendant only appealed devolutively in the original suit of this plaintiff against this same defendant, No. 7775 of the Docket of the Seventeenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Lafourche, and there being nothing contained in this record offered by the defendant as to why the rule should not have been made absolute by the District Court, and nothing offered in this Court, the judgment of the District Court was correct and is hereby affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.3

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 
of the United States Code

I, Caroline Dorsa, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.



| | /s/ Caroline Dorsa                                            
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Caroline DorsaPSEG Power LLCChief Financial OfficerMay 5, 2009



---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6561 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6561

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the secure 
  storage of a licensed firearm possessed by a Federal judge, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2022

Mr. Cole (for himself, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Hudson, Mr. 
    McHenry, and Mr. Hern) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
  Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the secure 
  storage of a licensed firearm possessed by a Federal judge, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearm Lockbox Protection Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE FOR FEDERAL JUDGES.

    Section 462 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Upon request of the Director, the Administrator of General 
Services is authorized and directed to provide, at the official duty 
station of each judge or justice, a secure firearms storage facility 
for any firearm lawfully possessed by that judge or justice.''.

SEC. 3. PROVISION OF SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES.

    Each agency that employs an administrative judge (including any 
administrative law judge appointed under section 3105 of title 5, 
United States Code) shall provide, at the principal duty station of 
that judge, a secure firearms facility for any firearm lawfully 
possessed by that judge.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.17


 


SUMMARY
OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


As
of January 3, 2005


 


 


 


                


	
  Function

  	
   

  	
  Amount Paid

  	
   

  	
  Form of Payment

  	
   

  
	
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $27,000 annually

  	
   

  	
  Payable in quarterly
  increments in shares of company common stock at its fair market value

  	
   

  
	
  Board Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $3,000 per meeting

  	
   

  	
  Cash per meeting attended

  	
   

  
	
  Standing Committee Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $1,250 per meeting

  	
   

  	
  Cash per meeting attended

  	
   

  
	
  Committee Chair Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $2,000 total per meeting

  	
   

  	
  Cash per meeting attended

  	
   

  
	
  Lead-Non Management Director Fee

  	
   

  	
  $10,000 annually

  	
   

  	
  Payable in cash in
  quarterly increments

  	
   

  
	
  Meeting Travel Expenses

  	
   

  	
  Reasonable and actual

  	
   

  	
  Cash reimbursement
176 La. 239

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles CHAPMAN.

No. 32151.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 3, 1933.

B. D. Watkins, of Minden, W. Shearer Brown, of Muskogee, Okl., and Samuel E. Montgomery, of North Little Bock, Ark., for appellant.

G. L. Porterie, Atty. Gen. (James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Eobert F. Kennon, Dist. Atty., of Minden, and James O’Niell, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

ODOM, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and appealed. While the appeal was pending in this court, he broke jail and escaped, and, on the day fixed for the hearing of his appeal, he was a fugitive from justice. On that ground the state has moved to dismiss the appeal.

Article 54S of the Code of Criminal Procedure reads as follows: “If the appellant be a fugitive from justice on the return day or on the day for the hearing of his appeal, the appeal will be dismissed.”

The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal must prevail. The appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 692 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 692

  To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to provide a 
rule to determine venue for a proceeding for judicial review of certain 
                            agency actions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2021

  Ms. Cheney (for herself, Mr. Young, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Crawford, Mr. 
    Perry, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Estes, Mr. Stauber, and Mr. Johnson of 
  Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to provide a 
rule to determine venue for a proceeding for judicial review of certain 
                            agency actions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recognition of Local Interests in 
NEPA Decision Making''.

SEC. 2. VENUE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 106. VENUE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    ``(a) In General.--A proceeding for judicial review of an agency 
action when there is an alleged failure to fulfill the requirements of 
section 102(2)(C) shall be brought exclusively in any of the following:
            ``(1) A United States district court for a district in 
        which the authorized activity is proposed to be carried out.
            ``(2) The United States district court for the District of 
        Columbia.
    ``(b) Agency Action Defined.--The term `agency action' has the 
meaning given such term in section 551 of title 5, United States 
Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         507,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,127,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9
<INVENTORY>                                  4,092,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,320,000
<PP&E>                                         694,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 538,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,353,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,607,000
<BONDS>                                      1,524,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,162,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,353,000
<SALES>                                     17,502,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,502,000
<CGS>                                       10,569,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,041,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                703,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            708,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   708,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.11

                      SEABOARD CORPORATION

                EXECUTIVE OFFICERS' BONUS POLICY



PURPOSE:   The purpose of this policy is to establish  guidelines
for  the  payment  of incentive compensation to  named  executive
officers of Seaboard Corporation.

AFFECTS:   The  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  the  other  named
executive  officers  of  Seaboard  Corporation,  as  defined   in
Item 402 of Regulation S-K.

POLICY:

1.   Incentive  Compensation Philosophy:  The  Company  maintains
     the philosophy that determination  of incentive compensation
     for its executive officers is based  upon a recognition that
     these   officers  are   responsible  for   implementing  the
     Company's  long-term  strategic  objectives.  All  executive
     compensation, including the incentive  portion, is  designed
     to attract  and  retain  top  executive employees.

2.   Basis for Determination of Incentive Compensation:

          The Board of Directors  shall  determine  annual  bonus
          amounts for the named executive officers, including the
          Chief Executive  Officer.  This  determination will  be
          based on a subjective review of the Company's financial
          performance, an assessment of each officer's individual
          contribution    to    that   performance   and    other
          discretionary factors.

          The amount assigned to each officer is discretionary.

3.   Method  and  Timing of Payments:  Payments will be  made  in
     cash after year-end  financials  are  available.  This  will
     normally occur about  February 1  following  the  end of the
     previous fiscal year.

EFFECTIVE  DATE:   As  of  the  2004 bonus,  and  supersedes  all
Executive Bonus Policies in effect prior thereto with respect  to
the named executive officers.

DEFERRED COMPENSATION:  Any portion of a bonus which causes total
compensation,  as  defined  in Section  162(m)  of  the  Internal
Revenue  Code of 1986, as amended, to exceed $1,000,000 shall  be
credited  to Seaboard Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan for the account of that Executive Officer.

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            982
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,137
<INVENTORY>                                    25,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              122,759 
<PP&E>                                         38,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                 28,356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                185,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          98,013
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          221
<OTHER-SE>                                     78,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  185,466
<SALES>                                        71,762 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               71,762
<CGS>                                          61,760         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,518 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   644
<INCOME-TAX>                                      584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                60
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                101,850
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         415,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                           928,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1,483,689
<PP&E>                                852,520
<DEPRECIATION>                       (621,003)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,871,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 763,007
<BONDS>                            18,807,248
<COMMON>                                  240
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                             3,167
<OTHER-SE>                        (17,702,447)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1,871,215
<SALES>                               729,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      729,828
<CGS>                                 457,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         457,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      241,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    348,382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (317,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (317,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        45,645
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                         (363,064)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.15)



</TABLE>