alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52404-52405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1785-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated August 24, 2008, and 
related determinations.

[[Page 52405]]


DATES: Effective Date: August 27, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 24, 2008.

    Nassau and Palm Beach Counties for Public Assistance.
    Volusia County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-20832 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
exv10w12



 






Exhibit 10.12




2005 BASE SALARIES




On January 25, 2005, the Compensation Committee authorized the following increases to the base
salaries of the Company’s executive officers, effective January 1, 2005:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	2005 Base Salary	 
	Michael McNeil
	 	$	300,000	 
	Jon J. Eberle
	 	$	105,000	 
	Dwain C. Jorgensen
	 	$	102,740	 
	Susan K. Kolling
	 	$	107,110	 
	Bradley C. Krehbiel
	 	$	135,200
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 12 (a)
                           J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                          and Consolidated Subsidiaries

       Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Combined Fixed Charges
                    and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         52 weeks       53 weeks
                                                           ended          ended
                                                          May 1,         May 2,
($ Millions)                                               1999           1998
                                                        ----------     ---------
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>
Income from continuing operations                        $   900        $   938
      (before income taxes, before
      capitalized interest, but after
      preferred stock dividend)

Fixed charges

Interest (including capitalized interest) on:

      Operating leases                                       225            180
      Short term debt                                        115             96
      Long term debt                                         558            564
      Capital leases                                           4              6
      Credit facility                                       --             --
      Other, net                                              (5)           (11)

                                                         -------        -------
Total fixed charges                                          897            835

Preferred stock dividend, before taxes                        34             40

Combined fixed charges and preferred
                                                         -------        -------
      stock dividend requirement                             931            875

Total available income                                   $ 1,831        $ 1,813
                                                         =======        =======

Ratio of available income to combined
      fixed charges and preferred stock
      dividend requirement                                   2.0            2.1
                                                         =======        =======
</TABLE>


The interest  cost of the LESOP notes  guaranteed by the Company is not included
in fixed charges above.

The Company  believes that, due to the seasonal  nature of its business,  ratios
for a period of time other than a 53 week or a 52 week period are inappropriate.
EX-35 (b)
(logo) AVELO
       MORTGAGE

Avelo Mortgage,

Annual Compliance Statement

Re: GSAMP Trust 2006-HE3 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2006-HE3, issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of May 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage
Securities Corp., as Depositor, Litton Loan Servicing LP, as a Servicer, Select
Portfolio Servicing, Inc., as a Servicer, Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as a Servicer,
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as a Custodian, U.S. Bank
National Association, as a Custodian, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as a
Custodian, LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Securities Administrator and Master Servicer, GSAMP Trust 2006-HE3

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from February 24, 2006 through December 31, 2006. This review was completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

For a period of time in 2006, bank accounts were not reconciled in strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

*  Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed
   securities, related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related
   bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are (A) mathematically
   accurate; (B) prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement
   cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
   agreements; (C) reviewed and approved by someone other than the person who
   prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain explanations for reconciling
   items. These reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar days of their
   original identification, or such other number of days specified in the
   transaction agreements.


The bank account reconciliations were current as of December 31, 2006, and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ James Weston Moffett
Name:  James Weston Moffett
Title: President and CEO
Date:  February 28, 2007


600 E. Las Colinas Blvd.  Suite 620  Irving, TX 75039  972.910.7000
F. 972.910.7099
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Precision Castparts Corp. (the “Company”) forthe fiscal quarter ended September 26, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William D. Larsson,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 5, 2004     |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
| /s/  William.D. Larsson    |   |
| William  D. Larsson        |
| Senior  Vice President and |
| Chief Financial  Officer   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          2,150
<SECURITIES>                                      441         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  43,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                    6,353
<INVENTORY>                                    28,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              141,318 
<PP&E>                                         38,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                204,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         117,694
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          221
<OTHER-SE>                                     78,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  204,546
<SALES>                                       225,237 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              225,237
<CGS>                                         191,786         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 222,444 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (550)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (550)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Diane Kellar, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree, misuse of food stamps as a felony, and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not submitting to the jury, as lesser included offenses of the offenses charged, grand larceny in the fourth degree, petit larceny, offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree, and misuse of food stamps as a misdemeanor. Defendant contends that, from the evidence, the jury could have found that she stole less than $1,500 required to sustain the conviction for grand larceny in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 155.35, as it existed before Nov. 1986) and that she misused food stamps of a value less than $250 *(see,*Social Services Law § 147, as it existed before Nov. 1986). Further, defendant contends that, from the evidence, the jury could have found that she lacked "intent to defraud”, which is an element of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (Penal *881Law § 175.35), but not an element of offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 175.30). We conclude, however, that there was no reasonable view of the evidence from which the jury could find that defendant stole money from the Department of Social Services, but that the amount was less than $1,500, or that defendant misused food stamps, but that the value of those stamps was less than $250. We also conclude that there was no reasonable view of the evidence from which the jury could find that, in offering the false instrument for filing, defendant lacked the intent to defraud. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J.—grand larceny, second degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of Citizens  Communications  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 11-K for the year ended  December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
B. Armour, Senior Vice-President,  Finance and Treasury of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the net assets available for benefits of the Plan and the changes
     in net assets available for benefits of the Plan.




/s/ Donald B. Armour
--------------------
Donald B. Armour
Senior Vice-President
June 30, 2003




This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Citizens  Communications  Company and will be retained by Citizens
Communications  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6733 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Internal 

Revenue Service from requiring taxpayers to provide biometric information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Mr. HUIZENGA (for himself, Mr. POSEY, Mrs. HINSON, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. 

BILIRAKIS, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. GOHMERT, Ms. LETLOW, Mr. RODNEY

DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Ms. MACE, 

Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BUCHANAN, 

Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. MANN, and Mr. GARCIA of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the Internal Revenue Service from requiring taxpayers 

to provide biometric information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban IRS Biometrics 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6733 IH

1 SEC. 2. TAXPAYER BIOMETRIC INFORMATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 77 of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following new section: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 7531. TAXPAYER BIOMETRIC INFORMATION. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall not, as a 

7 condition of filing any return, paying any tax, or receiving 

8 any service provided by the Internal Revenue Service, in9 cluding accessing the taxpayer’s own information, require 

10 any taxpayer to provide biometric information. 

11 ‘‘(b) BIOMETRIC INFORMATION.—For purposes of 

12 this section, the term ‘biometric information’ means infor13 mation regarding any measurable physical characteristic 

14 or personal behavioral trait used to recognize the identity, 

15 or verify the claimed identity or location, of an individual, 

16 including facial images, fingerprints, and iris scans.’’. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

18 for chapter 77 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

19 amended by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 7531. Taxpayer biometric information.’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to filings and transactions in tax22 able years ending on or after December 31, 2021. 

23 (d) SAFE DISPOSAL OF COLLECTED INFORMA24 TION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the en25 actment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury (or 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6733 IH

1 such Secretary’s delegate), in consultation with the Direc2 tor of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agen3 cy, shall develop a plan for the safe and secure destruction 

4 and disposal of any biometric information (as defined in 

5 section 7531(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 

6 as added by this section) collected or used by the Internal 

7 Revenue Service or any third-party vendor on behalf of 

8 such Service before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Mrs. Thomas E. MEREY v. Joseph ABRAHAM et al.

No. 1498.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 9, 1935.

For former opinion, see 159 So. 146.

Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr., and Sam Monk Zelden, both of New Orleans, for appellant. ■

Taylor, Porter & Brooks, of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

DORE, Judge.

In this case, for the reasons stated in the opinion rendered by this court in the consolidated cases of Peter Mansur and Mrs. *421Thomas E. Merey v. Joseph Abraham et al., 164 So. 418, it is ordered that our former decree dismissing plaintiff’s case at her costs in both courts be reinstated and made .final judgment of this court.

LE BLANC, J., concurs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Fleishman, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered December 22, 1987, convicting defendant, after trial by jury, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, fraud in the sale of securities (eight counts), issuing a false certificate of authenticity, and under separate indictment of a violation of probation on the underlying conviction of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of *IVi*to 3 years on the counts of scheme to defraud and fraud in the sale of securities and resentencing him upon the violation of probation to a consecutive term of 1 to 3 years, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts, to reverse the convictions of fraud in the sale of securities (eight counts), dismiss those counts and vacate the sentences imposed thereunder, and otherwise affirmed.

The proof herein showed the sale of unique, individually numbered (albeit counterfeit) lithographs to different buyers, at different times and at different prices. There was no pooling of funds, nor was there any substantial reliance by the purchasers upon the efforts of the promoters to produce profits but, rather, a reliance on the product itself to appreciate by itself over time. Despite defendant’s exaggeration of the poten*149tial value, and his offer to exchange for set periods of time, the intrinsic value of the prints would rise or fall of their own accord and not solely on the basis of defendant’s promotion *(see, Securities & Exch. Commn. v Howey Co.,*328 US 293, 299). The defendant’s promotion extended only to the immediate purchaser; the evidence did not show that he was promoting an investment scheme among a pool of investors so as to create any common enterprise *(see, Securities & Exch. Commn. v Howey Co., supra).*

Parenthetically, we note that while it may be argued these prints were commodities, as distinct from securities, such was not the theory of the indictment, the charge or the conviction. Accordingly, there is no reviewable issue of whether these prints would constitute commodities under the Martin Act. Further, since the sentences imposed on the conviction of the eight counts of fraud in the sale of securities were concurrent with the sentence imposed for the conviction for scheme to defraud, our reversal and vacatur as to the former does not mandate a remand for resentencing.

We have examined the remaining contentions by defendant and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.4


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the best
of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.




                                      /s/ E. James Ferland
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      E. James Ferland
                                      PSEG Power LLC
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      May 5, 2005
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 05, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 05, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0269. IN THE INTEREST OF B. L. W., A CHILD (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18JV00695