alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7029 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7029

 To prohibit certain Federal funds to be provided to any State, local, 
 Tribal, or private entity that operates an unlawful injection center, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

 Ms. Herrera Beutler introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit certain Federal funds to be provided to any State, local, 
 Tribal, or private entity that operates an unlawful injection center, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Injection Sites for Illegal 
Drugs Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS WITH RESPECT TO OPERATING 
              UNLAWFUL INJECTION CENTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the exception described in subsection 
(b), no Federal funds may be made available to any State, unit of local 
government, Indian tribal government, or other public and private 
entity that operates or controls an injection center in violation of 
section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856; commonly 
referred to as the ``Crack House Statute'').
    (b) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), Federal funds 
awarded pursuant to the COPS grant program or the Byrne grant program 
shall remain available to a State, unit of local government, Indian 
tribal government, or other public and private entity that operates or 
controls an injection center in violation of section 416 of the 
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856; commonly referred to as the 
``Crack House Statute'').
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) COPS grant program.--The term ``COPS grant program'' 
        means the grant program authorized under section 1701 of title 
        I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 
        U.S.C. 10381).
            (2) Byrne grant program.--The term ``Byrne grant program'' 
        means any grant program under subpart 1 of part E of title I of 
        the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 
        U.S.C. 10151 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
I 

★

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7118 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act relating to the sharing of 

death information with the Do Not Pay working system, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Ms. CRAIG (for herself and Mr. MEIJER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act relating to 

the sharing of death information with the Do Not Pay 

working system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Pay5 ment Integrity and Information Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHARING OF DEATH INFORMATION WITH DO NOT 

7 PAY WORKING SYSTEM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(r) of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 405(r)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 7118 IH1S 

1 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (A), by moving the 

3 margins for each of clauses (i) and (ii) 4 ems 

4 to the left; and 

5 (B) by moving the margins for each of 

6 subparagraphs (B) and (C) 4 ems to the left; 

7 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by moving the margins 

8 for each of clauses (i) and (ii) 2 ems to the left; 

9 (3) by moving the margins for paragraph (7) 2 

10 ems to the left; and 

11 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(11) The Commissioner of Social Security may, im13 mediately upon the date of enactment of this paragraph, 

14 and shall, beginning not later than December 27, 2022, 

15 provide information furnished to the Commissioner under 

16 paragraph (1) to the agency operating the Do Not Pay 

17 working system described in section 3354(c) of title 31, 

18 United States Code, to prevent improper payments to de19 ceased individuals through a cooperative agreement with 

20 such agency, provided that the requirements of subpara21 graphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (3) are met with respect 

22 to such agreement with such agency.’’. 

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 801 of divi24 sion FF of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 

25 (Public Law 116–260) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 7118 IH1S 

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’; 

3 (B) at the end of paragraph (6), by strik4 ing ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a period; and 

5 (C) by striking paragraph (7); and 

6 (2) by striking subsection (b). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Ex parte Alfred McDONALD, Jr.

No. 45888.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 26, 1972.

Stanley Rentz, Waco, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., by an inmate of the Texas Department of Corrections, attacking as void the conviction under which he is now confined.

A hearing was held before Honorable Carl C. Anderson, Judge of the 54th District Court of McLennan County, at the conclusion of which findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed by the court establishing that petitioner was convicted of murder in Cause No. 11,486, on July 21, 1941, with punishment assessed at life; that petitioner was represented by court-appointed attorney who gave notice of appeal after motion for new trial was overruled on August 28, 1941; that after sentence was pronounced, the petitioner signed a pauper’s oath, requested appointment of attorney for purpose of appeal and preparation of a statement of facts as reflected by exhibit introduced into evidence at this hearing; that at the bottom of said exhibit, there apeared a notation, “Motion Granted,” signed D. W. Bartlett, Judge; that no brief, statement of facts or transcript were ever filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals; that petitioner’s court-appointed counsel withdrew from the case, but no request to withdraw or order permitting withdrawal is reflected by the record; that there is no statement of facts available upon which petitioner may be granted an out-of-time appeal.

The findings of fact are supported by stipulated evidence and exhibits introduced at the hearing.

We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the relief prayed for should be granted. The petioner was denied effec*259tive representation of counsel on appeal and the conviction cannot stand. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811; Swenson v. Bosler, 386 U.S. 258, 87 S.Ct. 996, 18 L.Ed.2d 33; Ex parte Tullos, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 689; Ex parte Gaines, Tex.Cr.App., 455 S.W.2d 210; Ex parte Marshall, Tex.Cr.App., 445 S.W.2d 212.

The petitioner is ordered released from the Department of Corrections and delivered to the custody of the Sheriff of McLen-nan County to answer the indictment in Cause No. 11,486 pending against him.

It is so ordered.

Opinion approved by the Court.

ROBERTS, J., not participating.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DoD-2008-OS-0102]

# AGENCY:

Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a system of records.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Logistics Agency is deleting a system of records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This action will be effective without further notice on October 14, 2008 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DP, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Defense Logistics Agency notices for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: September 3, 2008.

Patricia Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## S400-50-CA

### System name:

Family Support Program Volunteer Files (November 16, 2004, 69 FR 67112).

### Reason:

Records were incorporated into S400.20, Day Care Facility Registrant and Applicant Records, published August 29, 2008 (73 FR 50949).

[FR Doc. E8-21099 Filed 9-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXHIBIT
32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I,
Ralph Izzo, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company,
to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public
Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ralph Izzo                         
| |                                        
| | Ralph Izzo                             
| | Public Service Electric and Gas Company
| | Chief Executive Officer                
| | August 1, 2007                         

---
Exhibit 10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 
  
 Long-term Incentive Program 
  
 The Committee of Independent Directors (as to the Chief Executive Officer) and the Executive Compensation Committee (as to the other executive officers)
of the Board of Directors have also approved long-term incentive awards for the executive officers for the 2005-2007 cycle of the Corporation’s 1997 Incentive Program, awarding performance-based restricted shares to the executive officers on
January 5, 2005 as follows: 
  

					
	 Officer

	  	 Title

	  	 Long-term Incentive Award


	 Thomas H. Johnson
	  	Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and Director	  	45,000 shares
			
	 Andrew J. Kohut
	  	President	  	20,000 shares
			
	 Neil Rylance (3)
	  	Executive Vice President - European Packaging	  	16,000 shares
			
	 J.P. Causey Jr.
	  	 Executive Vice President, Secretary & General
Counsel
	  	10,500 shares
			
	 Joel K. Mostrom (3)
	  	Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer	  	10,000 shares

  
 The restricted shares
for the 2005-2007 cycle, or portions thereof, will vest at the end of the cycle if specific cash generation and earnings per share growth targets are achieved. 
  

In lieu of participation in the 2005-2007 cycle of the 1997 Incentive Program, the Executive Compensation Committee approved for Mr. Gilchrist a
special 2005 cash incentive with a target award of 94,000 pounds Sterling based on growth of earnings per share, achievement of a target performance based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less capital expense margin
and his achievement of individual goals. 
  
 Fiscal 2005 Compensation

  
 Effective as of January 1, 2005, the Committee of
Independent Directors (as to the Chief Executive Officer) and the Executive Compensation Committee (as to the other executive officers) of the Board of Directors have also approved annual base salaries for the Corporation’s executive officers
as follows: 
  

					
	 Officer

	  	 Title

	  	 Compensation


	 Thomas H. Johnson
	  	Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and Director	  	$700,000
			
	 Andrew J. Kohut
	  	President	  	 $366,500
 $420,000 (2)

			
	 Keith Gilchrist
	  	 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer and Director
	  	$527,094 (1)
			
	 Neil Rylance (3)
	  	Executive Vice President - European Packaging	  	 $354,540 (1)
 $399,000 (1)(2)

			
	 J.P. Causey Jr.
	  	 Executive Vice President, Secretary & General
Counsel
	  	$270,000
			
	 Joel K. Mostrom (3)
	  	Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer	  	 $255,200
 $275,000 (2)


  

	(1)	- To be paid in pounds Sterling 

  

	(2)	- Effective July 1, 2005 

  

	(3)	- Messrs. Rylance and Mostrom were elected executive officers of the Corporation effective January 5, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 51 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 154
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 51

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2001

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to 
           the products of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress approves the 
extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to the products 
of the

Socialist Republic of Vietnam transmitted by the President to the 
Congress on June 8, 2001.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 154

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 51

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to 
           the products of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 10, 2001

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-21930296   3-017-CV

IN RE 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.InN rReEInN rReE AlLlLsStTaAtTeE InNsSuUrRaAnNcCeE CoOmMpPaAnNyY JaAmMeEsS EaArRlL CaArRrRoOlLlL	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied as moot.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL ABA:  LIVINGSTON, GARDNERR, and MCCOYY, 	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, LIVINGSTON ANDand HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 7, 2005 January 21, 2003September 67, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-20891

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EARL DWAYNE RUFFIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-94-298-3

- - - - - - - - - -

November 6, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Earl Dwayne Ruffin appeals his conviction and sentence for

use of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence on

the basis that there was insufficient evidence under Bailey v.

United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), which redefined the term

“use” in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) subsequent to his plea of guilty. 

The record contains sufficient evidence to support appellant’s
No. 95-20891

- 2 -

conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), even in light of the

narrower definition of “use” enunciated in Bailey. 

As part of his plea agreement, appellant waived his right to

appeal his sentence. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d

566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). His challenge to the sentencing

guideline application is not properly before this court. 

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Yearly
Report on Form 10-K of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2011, I, William Solko, Chief Executive
Officer of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|1. | Such Yearly Report of Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Northeast Automotive Holdings, Inc.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 16, 2012                  |                  
|------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                                      |                  
|Northeast Automotive Holdings,  Inc.  |                  
|                                      |                  
|By:                                   | /s/ William Solko
|William Solko Chief Executive Officer |
Filed 5/16/13 P. v. Wong CA6 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

THE PEOPLE, 

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

KAR WONG, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

 H039186 

 (Santa Clara County 

 Super. Ct. No. C1238968) 

After a confrontation with police in front of Eastridge Mall, defendant Kar Wong 

was charged with one count of assault on a peace officer (Pen. Code. § 245, subd. (c)), 

and six counts of exhibiting a weapon (chisel) to a peace officer with the intent to resist 

arrest. (Pen. Code, § 417.8.) During the proceedings, the court declared a doubt as to 

defendant’s competence to stand trial. Defense counsel waived jury trial and submitted 

the issue on the two doctors reports which found defendant not competent. The trial 

court ordered defendant committed to an unnamed state hospital, noting that he had 

consented to the administration of antipsychotic drugs. The court set a review date for 

June 11, 2014. This timely notice of appeal ensued. 

 On appeal, we appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court. Appointed 

counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no 

specific issues. (Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 543-544 (Ben C.); 

People v. Taylor (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 304.) In the opening brief, counsel requests 
2 

that we allow defendant the opportunity to submit a brief in propria persona on his own 

behalf pursuant to Ben C. On February 7, 2013, we notified defendant of his right to 

submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. Thirty days have elapsed and 

we have received nothing from defendant. 

The defendant having failed to raise any issue on appeal, we dismiss the appeal as 

abandoned. (Ben C., supra, 40 Cal.4th 529.) 

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed as abandoned. 

 _____________________________________ 

 RUSHING, P.J. 

WE CONCUR: 

_________________________________ 

PREMO, J. 

_________________________________ 

ELIA, J.