alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 698 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the alternative 

fuel refueling property credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. CHU, Mr. 

DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. NORTON, Mr. POCAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the alternative fuel refueling property credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electric Vehicle Charg5 ing Helps Access to Renewable Green Energy Act of 

6 2021’’ or the ‘‘EV CHARGE Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 698 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVE FUEL REFUELING PROPERTY CRED2 IT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30C(g) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘December 

5 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2026’’. 

6 (b) ADDITIONAL CREDIT FOR CERTAIN ELECTRIC

7 CHARGING PROPERTY.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 30C(a) of such Code 

9 is amended— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘equal to 30 percent’’ and 

11 inserting the following: ‘‘equal to the sum of— 

12 ‘‘(1) 30 percent’’, 

13 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

14 inserting ‘‘, plus’’, and 

15 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(2) 20 percent of so much of such cost as ex18 ceeds the limitation under subsection (b)(1) that 

19 does not exceed the amount of cost attributable to 

20 qualified alternative vehicle refueling property (de21 termined without regard to paragraphs (1), (2)(A), 

22 and (2)(B) of subsection (c)) which— 

23 ‘‘(A) is intended for general public use and 

24 recharges motor vehicle batteries with no asso25 ciated fee or payment arrangement, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 698 IH

1 ‘‘(B) is intended for general public use and 

2 accepts payment via a credit card reader, or 

3 ‘‘(C) is intended for use exclusively by 

4 fleets of commercial or governmental vehicles.’’. 

5 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

6 30C(b) of such Code is amended— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘The credit allowed under 

8 subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘The amount of 

9 cost taken into account under subsection 

10 (a)(1)’’, 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘$30,000’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘$100,000’’, and 

13 (C) by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘$3,333.33’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

17 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       81,670
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               505,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                 11,184
<INVENTORY>                                 478,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,061,632
<PP&E>                                    2,528,961
<DEPRECIATION>                            2,279,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,344,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       670,010
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     91,003
<OTHER-SE>                                  550,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,344,934
<SALES>                                     873,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            873,665
<CGS>                                       826,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               938,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (69,092)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (69,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Fedearl Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Rejuvenating the Aged Immune 
System.
    Date: October 2-3, 2008.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Crown Plaza--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Barney Duane Price, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DEA Room 3139, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-
2550, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98e8eaf1fbfdfafcd8f6f1f9f1fcb6f6f1f0b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f383819a90969197b39d9a929a97dd9d9a9bdd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Disease Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 2, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20836 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### William Ganisin, Respondent-Appellant, v Gerald J. Noeth et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this appeal from a judgment that awarded plaintiff damages in the nature of employee compensation, defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff compensation in excess of that provided in his contract of employment and in considering extrinsic evidence that varied the terms of the parties’ written agreement. We agree.

General Obligations Law § 15-301 (1) provides that "[a] written agreement or other written instrument which contains a provision *to the effect*that it cannot be changed orally, cannot be changed by an executory agreement unless such executory agreement is in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of the change is sought or by his agent” (emphasis added). Contrary to the holding of Supreme Court, it is not necessary that the agreement affirmatively proscribe oral amendment in order for section 15-301 (1) to be *829applicable. It is necessary only that the writing have such an effect. The writing herein meets this burden by stating that the contract may be amended by a writing signed by the parties. By setting forth the method by which the contract may be amended, to wit, by a writing, it implies the preclusion of other less formal methods of amendment.

Even if General Obligations Law § 15-301 (1) did not apply, Supreme Court nevertheless erred in considering this parol evidence. The integration clause contained in the employment contract precludes plaintiff’s attempts to incorporate the alleged prior oral agreement into the employment contract. Since the alleged oral agreement contradicted the nonambiguous language of the employment contract, it should not have been received *(see, Namad v Salomon Inc.,*147 AD2d 385, *affd*74 NY2d 751). This view is further supported by the fact that the oral amendment contradicts the expressed amendment clause in the contract and involves a provision, to wit, compensation, that would normally be embodied in the writing *(see, Mitchill v Lath,*247 NY 377, 381; *Ñamad v Salomon Inc., supra).*

Consequently, we reverse so much of the judgment appealed from that awards damages to the plaintiff and affirm in all other respects. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—breach of contract.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 14, 2009

1006 

# Order

October 14, 2009

138908

THOMAS JOHN SHAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138908 COA: 282550 Wayne CC: 06-608275-NZ JOHN ALDRICH, WILLIAM PLEMONS, and J. MILLER, Defendants-Appellees, and

OFFICER ALLBRIGHT and OFFICER LOCKLEAR,
Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is
considered. We direct the Clerk to sche dule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of th is order addressing whether Romska v Opper , 234 Mich App 512 (1999), was correctly decided. The parties should not submit
mere restatements of th eir application papers.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens  Communications Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
R. Shassian , Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Donald R. Shassian
------------------------------
Donald R. Shassian
Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2006


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Citizens  Communications  Company
and will be retained by Citizens  Communications  Company and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 704 

To amend section 708 of title 17, United States Code, to permit the Register 

of Copyrights to waive fees for filing an application for registration 

of a copyright claim in certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself and Ms. MACE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 708 of title 17, United States Code, to 

permit the Register of Copyrights to waive fees for filing 

an application for registration of a copyright claim in 

certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Artistic Recognition 

5 for Talented Students Act’’ or the ‘‘ARTS Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 704 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF FEES FOR WINNERS OF CERTAIN COM2 PETITIONS. 

3 Section 708 of title 17, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(e)(1) In this subsection, the term ‘covered competi7 tion’ means— 

8 ‘‘(A) an art competition sponsored by the Con9 gressional Institute that is open only to high school 

10 students; and 

11 ‘‘(B) the competition described in section 3 of 

12 H. Res. 77, as adopted by the 113th Congress. 

13 ‘‘(2) With respect to a work that wins a covered com14 petition, the Register of Copyrights— 

15 ‘‘(A) shall waive the requirement under sub16 section (a)(1) with respect to an application for reg17 istration of a copyright claim for that work if that 

18 application is filed not later than the last day of the 

19 calendar year following the year in which the work 

20 claimed by the application wins the covered competi21 tion (referred to in this paragraph as the ‘covered 

22 year’); and 

23 ‘‘(B) may waive the fee described in subpara24 graph (A) for an application filed after the end of 

25 the covered year if the fee would have been waived 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 704 IH

1 under that subparagraph had the application been 

2 submitted before the last day of the covered year.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket Nos. RP08-426-000; RP08-426-001] 

      ( print page 50958)    
                    On June 30, 2008, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) filed revised tariff sheets pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 154 of the Commission's regulations. In its filing, El Paso proposes a number of new services, a rate increase for existing services, and changes in certain terms and conditions of service. On August 5, 2008, the Commission issued an order [1]                                          accepting and suspending the tariff sheets, subject to refund and conditions, establishing hearing procedures, and establishing a technical conference. In that order, the Commission directed the Staff to convene a technical conference to address the proposed services and terms and conditions reflected in El Paso's filing.                 

Take notice that a technical conference to discuss issues raised by El Paso's filing will be held on Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST) and Friday, September 12, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. If necessary, the conference will continue on Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST) and Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST). 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All parties and staff are permitted to attend. For further information please contact April Ballou at (202) 502-6537 or                     *April.Ballou@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             124 FERC ¶ 61,124 (2008).                     
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-20046 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Ruth Roberson, Plaintiff, v City of New York, Defendant, and New York City Housing Authority, Appellant. District Attorney of Kings County, Nonparty Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Housing Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated March 16, 1989, as denied that branch of its motion, which was to compel the disclosure of Grand Jury minutes pertaining to the indictment of the plaintiff’s alleged assailant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In this action, the plaintiff Ruth Roberson seeks damages for personal injuries arising out of an alleged assault on premises owned by the defendant New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter the Authority). In connection with its defense of this action, the Authority moved, *inter alia,*to compel disclosure of the Grand Jury minutes pertaining to the indictment of the plaintiff’s alleged assailant. In support of its application, the Authority asserted that the disclosure sought was "important for the proper defense of this action”. Leave to inspect the Grand Jury minutes was also sought "to determine and evaluate what the plaintiff * * * said regarding the happening of [the] occurrence and additionally in order that the grand jury minutes could be used for purpose of impeachment and to refresh the recollection of the plaintiff * * * or for the limited purpose of leading hostile witnesses”.

A "strong presumption of confidentiality” applies to Grand Jury proceedings *(Ruggiero v Fahey,*103 AD2d 65, 70; *see also,*CPL 190.25 [4]). Nevertheless, the rule of secrecy is not *292absolute and, in the discretion of the trial court, disclosure may be directed when, after a balancing of a public interest in disclosure against the rule of secrecy, the former outweighs the latter *(People v Di Napoli,*27 NY2d 229, 235). But since disclosure is "the exception rather than the rule”, one seeking disclosure first must demonstrate a compelling and particularized need for access (Pitler, New York Criminal Practice Under the CPL § 5.7, at 236). "However, just any demonstration will not suffice. For it and the countervailing policy ground it reflects must be strong enough to overcome the presumption of confidentiality. In short, without the initial showing of a compelling and particularized need, the question of discretion need not be reached, for then there simply would be no policies to balance” *(Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County,*58 NY2d 436, 444).

The general and conclusory allegations put forward by the Authority in support of its application do not satisfy the "threshold requirement of showing a compelling and particularized need for the Grand Jury testimony requested” *(Ruggiero v Fahey,*103 AD2d 65, *supra,*at 72; *see also, Melendez v City of New York, 109*AD2d 13). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the Authority’s application for disclosure of the Grand Jury minutes. Eiber, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Citicorp
Address:   399 Park Avenue
           New York, New York 10043

Form 13F File Number:              28-45

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Glenn S. Gray
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 559-6528

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Glenn S. Gray         New York, New York              November 12, 1999
-----------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
**
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019(the “Report”) of SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/s/ Richard L. Peteka
**Name**: Richard L. Peteka**Date**: February 20, 2020**