alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                       762
<INVENTORY>                                     11,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,135
<PP&E>                                           4,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,463
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,972
<SALES>                                          4,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,928
<CGS>                                            3,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.28)
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 365 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6734 

[Report No. 117–469] 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize the volunteer 

services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the 

National Wildlife Refuge System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GRAVES of 

Louisiana, Mr. THOMPSON of California, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2022 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 

printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6734 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize 

the volunteer services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the National Wildlife Refuge 

System, and for other purposes. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6734 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep America’s Ref5 uges Operational Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF7 UGE SYSTEM VOLUNTEER SERVICES, COMMU8 NITY PARTNERSHIP, AND REFUGE EDU9 CATION PROGRAMS. 

10 Section 7(g) of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 

11 (16 U.S.C. 742f) is amended by striking ‘‘2018 through 

12 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘2022 through 2026’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 365 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6734 

[Report No. 117–469] 

A BILL 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to repurposes. National Wildlife Refuge System, and for other nership, and refuge education programs of the authorize the volunteer services, community partSEPTEMBER 19, 2022 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
February 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned Maurice J. Hamilburg, President and Co-Chief Operating
Officer, Joseph D. Hamilburg, Chairman and Co-Chief Operating
Officer and Joseph J. Berns, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the Signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/  Maurice J. Hamilburg
President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: 04/12/04



/s/  Joseph J. Hamilburg
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: 04/12/04



/s/  Joseph J. Berns
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date: 04/12/04
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6499 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6499

 To enhance rail safety and provide for the safe and covered transport 
         of materials in railroad cars, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2022

 Ms. Meng (for herself and Mr. Suozzi) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To enhance rail safety and provide for the safe and covered transport 
         of materials in railroad cars, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Train Coverings for Community Safety 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RULEMAKING REQUIRED.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations requiring 
materials transported by rail to be completely covered while in 
transit, including while being held, delayed, or transferred.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Jonathan B. Altschuler.

Motion granted only insofar as to permit respondent to reapply for reinstatement in accordance with section 603.14 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 603.14). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Giles, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—attempted criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification

I, Joseph D. Hamilburg, Chairman and Co- Chief Executive Officer of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plymouth
Rubber Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

(b) [Omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 12, 2004            /s/Joseph D. Hamilburg
                             --------------------------------
                                   Joseph D. Hamilburg
                             Chairman and Co-Chief Executive
                                         Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Prime Hospitality Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
T. Szymanski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard T. Szymanski
------------------------
Richard T. Szymanski
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2003
EX-33 (h)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB
SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Perod"), with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the "CFR"), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c),
(d)(4)(ii), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
respect to the transactions covered by this report (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(4)(vii) and
(d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the
Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of
these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions
covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed
after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after
January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as
of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that
the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the
Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole except for as
discussed below:

Standard                Description
1122(d)(1)(i)   The Asserting Party has not instituted policies and procedures
                to specifically monitor performance or other triggers or
                events of default stated in the transaction agreements
1122(d)(1)(iv)  During the months of July, August, and September, the Company's
                minimum coverage requirement exceeded its $160 million fidelity
                bond by amounts ranging up to approximately $1.3 million.
1122(d)(3)(i)(A)The Asserting Party did not maintain or provide one of the
                required monthly reports stated in the transaction agreements
                during the year
1122(d)(3)(i)(D)The Asserting Party did not perform procedures to agree the
                unpaid principal balance and number of loans serviced by the
                Asserting Party with that of the investors or trustees

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/ Terence W. Edwards
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Mark Danahy
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Martin L. Foster
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President - Loan Servicing
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2019

s0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2019

157994(30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157994

COA: 340950

Genesee CC: 11

- 029033

- FC

JONNIE TYRELL JOHNSON, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 4,

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
#### Timothy J. Prunty, Respondent, v Keltie’s Bum Steer, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101), the defendant Keltie’s Bum Steer appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.), dated February 24, 1989, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, the complaint is dismissed as against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

On October 16, 1987, the plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident while a passenger in his own car, which was being driven by his brother. On the evening of the accident, the plaintiff and his brother had consumed a number of alcoholic beverages at various bars and restaurants. The plaintiff’s verified bill of particulars and the depositions of the plaintiff and his brother indicated that the plaintiff had bought at least one drink for his brother while on the premises of the defendant Keltie’s Bum Steer (hereinafter the appellant).

The appellant moved for summary judgment on the ground *596that the plaintiff was barred from recovering under the Dram Shop Act *(see,*General Obligations Law § 11-101) because he had contributed to his brother’s alleged intoxication by purchasing alcoholic beverages for him. In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff and his brother submitted affidavits of correction which purported to amend certain portions of their deposition transcripts to reflect that they did not recall if the plaintiff had bought his brother any drinks. The plaintiff also cross-moved to so amend his bill of particulars. The appellant’s motion for summary judgment was denied and the plaintiff’s cross motion to amend his bill of particulars was granted.

Absent prejudice to the other side, the court has the inherent power to permit changes to a deposition transcript after it has been signed *(see, Roberts v Ausable Chasm Co.,*47 AD2d 979). However, on a motion for summary judgment, the court must determine whether the factual issues presented are genuine or unsubstantiated. If the issue claimed to exist is not genuine, but is feigned and there is nothing to be tried, then summary judgment should be granted *(see, Glick & Dolleck v Tri-Pac Export Corp.,*22 NY2d 439; *Columbus Trust Co. v Campolo,*110 AD2d 616, *ajfd*66 NY2d 701).

If the plaintiff were found to have caused or procured his brother’s intoxication, he would be barred from recovery against the appellant under the Dram Shop Act *(see,*General Obligations Law §11-101; *Mitchell v The Shoals, Inc.,*19 NY2d 338; *Powers v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,*129 AD2d 37; *Vandenburg v Brosnan,*129 AD2d 793, *affd*70 NY2d 940). We find that the plaintiff has attempted to avoid the consequences of the earlier admissions by raising a feigned factual issue which is insufficient to defeat the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50676 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUBEN VALDEZ-CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-639-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ruben Valdez-Cardenas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Valdez-Cardenas argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. He argues that his sentence exceeds the term of imprisonment which may be imposed under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).No. 03-50676 -2-
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Valdez-Cardenas acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, including Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Preformed Line Products Company for
the period ended September 30, 2009 which this certification accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Preformed Line
Products Company.
 November 3, 2009
    /s/ Robert G. RuhlmanRobert G. RuhlmanChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) of Powell Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Don R. Madison, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |                                                                                
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    June 11, 2004 | /s/    DON R. MADISON
Don R. Madison
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer