alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6755 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit to 

Congress a report on big tech and law enforcement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to submit to Congress a report on big tech and law 

enforcement, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cooperation Among 

5 Police, Tech, and Users to Resist Exploitation Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘CAPTURE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6755 IH

1 SEC. 2. GAO STUDY AND REPORT ON BIG TECH AND LAW 

2 ENFORCEMENT. 

3 (a) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year after the date of 

4 enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 

5 United States shall complete a study on the following: 

6 (1) How social media companies currently com7 municate, consult, and coordinate with Federal, 

8 State, and local law enforcement to address illegal 

9 content and activity online. 

10 (2) Document successes and failures by social 

11 media companies in cooperating with Federal, State, 

12 and local law enforcement agencies in events of im13 minent injury or death to individuals. 

14 (3) Ways in which social media companies can 

15 better communicate, consult, and coordinate with 

16 Federal, State, and local law enforcement to address 

17 illegal content and activity online. 

18 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS REQUIRED.—Not later 

19 than 6 months after the completion of the study required 

20 under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 

21 United States shall submit to the Committee on Energy 

22 and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the 

23 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of 

24 the Senate a report that contains— 

25 (1) the results of the study conducted pursuant 

26 to subsection (a); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6755 IH

1 (2) recommendations to— 

2 (A) develop legislation that may assist so3 cial media companies to better communicate, 

4 consult, and coordinate with Federal, State, 

5 and local law enforcement to address illegal 

6 content and activity online; and 

7 (B) require social media companies to es8 tablish a single point of contact in every State 

9 for Federal, State, and local law enforcement 

10 entities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51334-51335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20310]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Air Traffic Procedures Advisory 
Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic control 
procedures and practices for standardization, clarification, and 
upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 4, 2008, from 9 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesday, November 5, 2008, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 
2660 Woodley Road, NW., Washington, DC 20008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Jehlen, Executive 
Director, ATPAC, System Operations and Safety, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 493-4527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Tuesday, November 4, 
2008 from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesday, November 5, 2008, from 9 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The agenda for this meeting will cover: A 
continuation of the Committee's review of present air traffic control 
procedures and practices for standardization, clarification, and 
upgrading of terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern.
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items.
    4. Report from Executive Director.
    5. Items of Interest.
    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.

[[Page 51335]]

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statement should notify the person 
listed above not later than October 24, 2008. The next quarterly 
meeting of the FAA ATPAC is planned to be held from January 13-14, 
2009, in Miami, FL.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time at the address given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 26, 2008.
Richard Jehlen,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures, Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-20310 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Powell, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), rendered May 21, 1987, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that his guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence adduced at trial established that the decedent, 31á-year-old Andrew Lamar, Jr., was killed as a result of internal injuries which were inflicted upon him at a time when he was in the defendant’s exclusive physical custody. Two expert forensic pathologists, examining different aspects of the medical evidence, opined that the child was injured at approximately 10:00 p.m. on January 10, 1986, by a forceful blow to the abdomen. At this time the child’s mother was at work and she had entrusted her son’s care to the defendant, who was her live-in boyfriend. Viewing this circumstantial evidence, including the evidence that the child had apparently been previously abused *(see, People v Stanley,*135 AD2d 910), in the light most favorable to the People, we conclude that the facts from which the jury could infer the defendant’s guilt were inconsistent with his innocence and excluded every other reasonable hypothesis to a moral certainty *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620; *People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*
      *427CPL 470.15 [5]), as the testimony of the two medical experts proffered by the People convincingly established that only the defendant could have inflicted the fatal injuries. Although the defense proffered the testimony of its own expert, who presented a contrary opinion, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94; *People v Ludwig,*155 AD2d 558). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88).

Finally, the defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *see also, People v Lipton,*54 NY2d 340; *People v Rodriguez,*137 AD2d 565) and in any event, is without merit *(see, e.g., People v Morillo,*156 AD2d 479). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Rubin and Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         4,227
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    8,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,353
<PP&E>                                         4,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,309
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       22
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,398
<SALES>                                        28,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28,874
<CGS>                                          18,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                853
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            845
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                11
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.14
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997             JUN-12-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1996             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1997             JUN-12-1998
<CASH>                                          24,243                  14,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  22,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,668                 148,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,948                   2,674
<INVENTORY>                                      4,190                   4,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,393                 199,378
<PP&E>                                          46,430                  44,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,685                  29,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,196                 326,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,794                 112,666
<BONDS>                                         25,019                  24,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        75,341                  76,264
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,288                  59,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,196                 135,358
<SALES>                                      1,001,889                 465,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,001,889                 465,596
<CGS>                                          877,016                 410,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  877,016                 410,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,551                  59,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   885                     479
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,897                   1,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,540                 (6,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,807                   2,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,733                 (8,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,733                 (8,520)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17                   (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12                   (.68)
        

</TABLE>
#### McHENRY v. WALL et al.

No. 5120.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1935.

A. L. Davenport, of Monroe, and Duncan S. Kemp, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh, of Monroe, for appellees.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The record in this case does not contain-the judgment appealed from, although the minutes recite that one was signed dismissing the suit; nor is there in the record any note of evidence taken in the lower court.

In the absence of these essentials from the record, the case cannot be passed on by us. We are left no alternative but to dismiss' the appeal, and it is so ordered.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Middle Kingdom Alliance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K, for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard J. Tanenbaum III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Fred A. Brasch     
|Fred A. Brasch         
|Chief Financial Officer

February 11, 2009
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6950 

To require the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to 

eliminate its Enterprise Content Management Imaging Repository System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2022 

Mr. GOSAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 

Explosives to eliminate its Enterprise Content Management Imaging Repository System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Gun Lists Act of 

5 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6950 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, 

2 TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES 

3 ELIMINATE ITS ENTERPRISE CONTENT MAN4 AGEMENT IMAGING REPOSITORY SYSTEM. 

5 The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Ex6 plosives shall immediately eliminate its Enterprise Content 

7 Management Imaging Repository System, and shall not 

8 establish or maintain any system or database which con9 tains information similar to the information in that sys10 tem. 

11 SEC. 3. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION. 

12 A person aggrieved by a violation of section 2 may 

13 bring an action against the United States in any Federal 

14 district court for damages and injunctive relief. The court 

15 shall award a plaintiff prevailing in the action such relief 

16 as the court deems appropriate, including reasonable at17 torneys’ fees. 

18 SEC. 4. WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. 

19 The United States, all agencies and instrumentalities 

20 thereof, and all individuals, firms, corporations, other per21 sons acting for the United States and with the authoriza22 tion and consent of the United States, shall not be im23 mune from suit in Federal or State court by any person, 

24 including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, 

25 for any violation of section 2. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21


                   NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY
                         OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.



Non-employee directors of Oil States International, Inc. receive the following
compensation:

    o   Annual retainer of $30,000 for board membership, paid quarterly in
        arrears

    o   Annual retainer of $15,000 for service as the Audit Committee
        Chairperson, paid quarterly in arrears

    o   Annual retainer of $10,000 for service as the Compensation or Nominating
        and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson, payable quarterly in
        arrears

    o   Annual retainer of $7,500 for service as a member of the Audit
        Committee, other than Chairperson, payable quarterly in arrears

    o   Annual retainer of $5,000 for service as a member of the Compensation or
        Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, not a Chairperson,
        payable quarterly in arrears

    o   Meeting fees

            o   $1,500 for each Board meeting attended

            o   $1,500 for each Committee meeting attended

    o   Reimbursement for expenses incurred in attending meetings

    o   Participation in the Company's 2001 Equity Participation Plan

    Under current guidelines, newly elected directors receive options to
    purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock upon their initial election.
    Directors receive additional options to purchase 5,000 shares at each annual
    meeting after which they continue to serve. These options are granted under
    the 2001 Equity Participation Plan, vest in four equal annual installments
    and expire ten years from the date of grant. In the event of a change in
    control, the options vest in accordance with the terms of the grant
    agreements. The exercise price of these options is the fair market value at
    the date of grant. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has
    recently recommended, subject to approval at the next Annual Meeting of
    Shareholders, that the Company's 2001 Equity Participation Plan be amended
    to allow equity awards to Directors on the same basis as employees. All of
    our directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred
    in attending meetings of our Board of Directors or committees and for other
    reasonable expenses related to the performance of their duties as directors.
    Directors may also participate in the Company's nonqualified deferred
    compensation plan that permits a participant to defer all or a part of their
    cash compensation from the Company until the termination of their status as
    a director.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Shunsky,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 15, 2004

                                        /s/ Vincent Shunsky
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Vincent Shunsky
                                        Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0555

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEPHANIE LYNN LEDOUX,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 21, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 8 2024

01/08/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0555
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 4, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.


Date: August 12, 2010

/s/ RandyLiebleRandy LiebleChief Financial Officer