alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting on Thursday, October 2, 2008. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.2. 

The meeting agenda includes the following:

(1) Welcome/Introductions; 

(2) Members visit areas in Land Between The Lakes; 

(3) Board discussion on morning visits relating to dispersed recreation/education; 

(4) Update on Nature Watch; 

(5) LBL Updates; 

(6) Board Discussion of Comments Received. 

The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and may be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written comments must be received at Land Between The Lakes by September 25, 2008, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. Board members will review written comments received, and at their request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 2, 2008, 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., CDT. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Land Between The Lakes Administrative Building, Golden Pond, Kentucky, and will be open to the public. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211, 270-924-2002. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In the morning of October 2, 2008, Advisory Board members will visit various locations throughout Land Between The Lakes to research dispersed recreation/education opportunities. These visits will be done in small groups to different locations; the full board will not be visiting the same location. No official business of the board will take place during these morning visits. 

Dated: September 5, 2008. 

William P. Lisowsky, 

Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.

[FR Doc. E8-20883 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
EXHIBIT 32.5

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

| | /s/
    Thomas M. OFlynn                                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Thomas M. OFlynnPublic Service Electric and Gas CompanyChief Financial OfficerMay 6, 2008



---
#### In the Matter of Robin L., an Infant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Matter of Sommerville v Erie County Dept. of Social*
      *840
      *Servs.,*([appeal No. 1] 163 AD2d 838 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Manz, J.—adoption.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
Description of the Weyerhaeuser Company Option Exercise/Share Purchase Program



 Exhibit 10.G 
  
 Weyerhaeuser Company and Subsidiaries 
  
 EXHIBIT 10 (g) — Description of the Weyerhaeuser Company Option Exercise/Share Purchase Program 
  
 Option Exercise/Share Purchase Program 
  
 In April 2004, the Weyerhaeuser Company Board of Directors approved a program for a limited number of company employees who had been prohibited for extended periods from
exercising options previously granted to them under company option plans as a result of prohibitions on trading put in place by the company in connection with material transactions. The company’s executive officers are all participants in the
program. Under the program, participants are allowed to exercise options granted to them under the company’s 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan and prior company option plans and simultaneously sell to the company the shares acquired upon exercise.
Participants who exercise options under this program receive the difference between the exercise price of the options and the fair market value of the shares. The fair market value of such shares is the average of the high and low price for the
company’s common stock (as reported in the New York Stock Exchange Consolidation Tape) on the day of exercise. The remaining terms of the options are governed by the plans under which the options were granted.
#### Donald R. Winters, Sr., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Court of Claims, McMahon, J. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims, McMahon, J.—medical malpractice.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7002 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7002

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
            by blue and yellow lights in support of Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2022

Mrs. Wagner (for herself, Ms. Bush, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
 Cleaver, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Long, and Mr. Smith of Missouri) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
            by blue and yellow lights in support of Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gateway Solidarity Act''.

SEC. 2. ILLUMINATION OF THE GATEWAY ARCH IN SUPPORT OF UKRAINE.

    To show support and solidarity with the Ukrainian people, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch in St. 
Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated by blue and yellow lights for a 
certain period of time, to be designated by the Secretary of the 
Interior.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0001078 24-JUN-2014 09:34 AM
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  May 12, 2010





Frontier Communications Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





001-11001
06-0619596(Commission File Number)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)3 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut
06905(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)





(203) 614-5600


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





_________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):





o      Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))





Item 8.01.
Other Events




On May 12, 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share, payable on June 30, 2010 to holders of record of its common stock at the close of business on June 9, 2010.  A copy of the Company’s press release issued on May 12, 2010 announcing the declaration of the dividend is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.




Item 9.01.
Financial Statements and Exhibits




(d)
Exhibits




99.1
Press Release of Frontier Communications Corporation issued May 12, 2010.

















SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.










FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDate:  May 12, 2010
By:/s/ Robert J. LarsonRobert J. LarsonSenior Vice President andChief Accounting Officer
Except to the extent specifically provided to the contrary in this letter, allterms and conditions of the Potlatch Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, without modification or limitation. This consent and modification shall not operate as a consent to any other action or inaction by the Borrower or any ofthe Guarantors, or as a waiver of any right, power, or remedy of any Lender or the Agent under, or any provision contained in, the Potlatch Credit Agreement except as specifically provided herein. This consent and may be executed in two or morecounterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. This letter shall constitute a Credit Document.      Very truly yours,**LENDERS:**   **BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,**in its capacity as Administrative Agent      By:               Name:               Title:               **BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,**individually in its capacity as a Lender      By:               Name:               Title:               **THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA**      By:               Name:               Title:               **COBANK, ACB**      By:               Name:               Title:               **WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.**      By:               Name:               Title:          [Lender Signatures Continue] 
       **WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (f/k/a WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.)**      By:               Name:               Title:               **NORTHWEST FARM CREDIT SERVICES, PCA**      By:               Name:               Title:               **TRANSAMERICA BUSINESS CAPITAL CORPORATION**      By:               Name:               Title:               **CAPITAL FARM CREDIT**      By:               Name:               Title:               **U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION**      By:               Name:               Title:
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Maxco, Inc. (the
        “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence O.
        Fields, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        This
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


MAXCO,
              INC.Date: April
              3, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Lawrence
              O. FieldsLawrence
              O. FieldsChief
                Financial Officer




A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   29
#### Earnest Lee THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45083.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 1972.

Melvyn Carson Bruder, Dallas (On appeal only), for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Robert T. Baskett, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Hut-tash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of robbery; the punishment was assessed by a jury at 99 years.

Appellant initially contends that his request for discovery of the “criminal records in possession of the prosecutor regarding the State’s witnesses,” should have been granted.

*219There is no showing that the prosecuting attorney had any “criminal records” regarding the State’s witnesses in his possession. No error is shown by the refusal of such request. Elliott v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 239; Hardin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 156.

Next, appellant asserts that “The trial court erred in sustaining the prosecutor’s objection to appellant’s attempted impeachment of the complaining witness.”

The complaining witness was asked on cross-examination whether he had been convicted of carrying weapons and using those weapons. Appellant argues that the objection to such questions should not have been sustained because “the use of the prohibited weapon constitutes a felony, and a conviction therefor may be used for impeachment.” He argues that Article 38.29, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., allows impeachment of any witness by proof of final felony convictions,1 and that since carrying a prohibited weapon may be a felony under certain circumstances, he was entitled to obtain the details from the witness as to whether or not this was a misdemeanor or a felony. The record was not developed to show that such examination would have revealed facts that would have been admissible, therefore, it would be only speculative conjecture to say what may be. No error is shown.

White v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 362 S.W.2d 650.

Lastly, appellant contends he “was denied due process and equal protection of the law when the prosecution introduced before the jury a prior conviction wherein appellant was given a suspended sentence, which suspended sentence had not been set aside.”

Such conviction was introduced into evidence before the jury at the punishment phase of the trial and no objection was addressed to the introduction thereof. No error is shown. Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 470 S.W.2d 663; Macias v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 451 S.W.2d 489. See also, Article 37.07, Sec. 3(a), V.A.C.C.P.

There being no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. Convictions for misdemeanors involving moral turpitude are also admissible for such purpose. Cf. Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 828. However, the misdemeanor offense of unlawfully carrying arms is not an offense involving moral turpitude.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               BD
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES INC. AS OF
AND FOR THE PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                          28,374
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  615,692
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                             27,441
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                            184,233
<PP&E>                                                          30,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 988,535
<SHORT-TERM>                                                   218,841
<PAYABLES>                                                     328,855
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                    21,137
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                              48,643
<LONG-TERM>                                                     44,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                        18,661
<OTHER-SE>                                                     156,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   988,535
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                               43,994
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                            12,290
<COMMISSIONS>                                                   46,415
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                                   20,937
<FEE-REVENUE>                                                    8,905
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               6,155
<COMPENSATION>                                                  86,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  2,983
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                                       2,983
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     1,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
#### PARKER v. WILLIAMS.

4 Div. 820.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 18, 1935.

Rehearing Denied June 4,1935.

Mulkey & Mulkey, of Geneva, for appellant.

B. W. Smith, of Samson, and O. S. Lewis, of Dothan, for appellee.

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Bill by the appellant mortgagor to cancel certain real estate mortgages held by the ap-pellee as receiver of the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank of Samson, claiming payment of the mortgage debt, praying an accounting, and in the alternative for a redemption if it be ascertained that any of the debt remains unpaid. Appellee answered the bill and made the same a cross-bill seeking a foreclosure and the appointment of a receiver pending this litigation to collect the rents and preserve the property. The trial court, under the pleading, and evidence by affidavits, appointed a receiver, and it is from this order the appeal is prosecuted.

It is well settled by the decisions of this court that the appointment of a receiver is a most delicate power which should be exercised with great caution. It is also as well settled that if the mortgaged property is of sufficient value to pay the debt, a receiver should not be appointed regardless of the insolvency of the mortgagor. Taylor v. Hoffman, 229 Ala. *420,11⁄87*So. 851; McDermott v. Halliburton, 219 Ala. 659, 123 So. 207. From aught appearing, either by averment or proof, the property is amply sufficient to pay the mortgage indebtedness regardless of the mortgagor’s failure to have paid the tax and insurance. Therefore, pretermitting the question as to the sufficiency of the affidavit of Martin, supporting the cross-bill, the order appointing the receiver was improper and the decree is reversed and one is here rendered vacating said order.

Reversed and rendered.

GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur. (

On Rehearing.

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The following statement in the former opinion, “From aught appearing, either by averment or proof, the property is amply sufficient to pay the mortgage indebtedness,” is challenged by the insistence that the cross-bill, paragraph O, page 23 of the record, contains the following statement: “Respondent further shows that the said R. E. Parker, is insolvent, and unable to respond in damages; that the property conveyed by said mortgage is wholly insufficient to pay the indebtedness of the said R. E. Parker to the Farmers & Merchants Bank of Samson.”

*513This is no certain or specific averment that the mortgaged property was insufficient to pay the mortgage debt, as Parker may have owed the bank debts not covered by the mortgage. But, conceding that the averment meant that the property was worth less than the mortgage debt, there was no proof of this fact and averment without proof of this fact did not justify the appointment of the receiver.

Rehearing denied.

GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., eoncur.
EXHIBIT 10.6         

           
A Severance Agreement has been executed by the Company and the indicated employee,  substantially identical in all material respects to the form of Severance Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's
2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K except as noted below.

   

   




	
EMPLOYEE 

          
	

POSITION

          
	
DATE OF AGREEMENT

          

	


          	







          	


          
	
   Gordon S. Borteck 
          
	
Vice President, Organization 

   and Human Resources 

 
	
    March 15, 2002

	
  Alain Bouruet-Aubertot
	
Senior Vice President,

      Managing Director, Minteq 

 
	
November 25, 2002

	
  Michael A. Cipolla
	



Vice President - Controller 

     and Chief
Accounting Officer

 
	
March 1, 2001

	
  Kirk G. Forrest



 
	

Vice President, General Counsel

and Secretary

 
	
   December 1, 2004





	
    D. Randy Harrison

  	

Vice President and Managing 

       Director, Performance Minerals

 
	
 March 15, 2002

	
   William Kromberg 
	
Vice President - Taxes



 
	
March 1, 2001

	

   Kenneth Massimine



 
	
 
 Senior Vice President, 

 and Managing
 Director Paper PCC 

 
	

March 1, 2001

	

   Paul R. Saueracker



 
	

      Chairman, President and 

        Chief Executive Officer

 
	
January 1, 1997

	

   John A. Sorel



 
	

      Senior Vice President - 

       Chief Financial Officer

 
	

March 1, 2001