alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward B. Kornfeld, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porta Systems Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


                                             /s/Edward B. Kornfeld
                                             ---------------------
Dated: August 12, 2004                       Edward B. Kornfeld
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                 Page 17 of 18
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

                  MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS


          All of Registrant's railroad properties are on long-term lease
 to Norfolk and Western Railway Company for the fixed, unvarying amount
 of $915,000 cash rental per year. The lease also requires that
 additional, large amounts be recorded as non-cash rent income.


          With fixed revenue and expenses relatively constant, there is
 very little fluctuation in operating results between periods. In
 comparing the first quarter of 1998 with the preceding fourth quarter
 1997 and the first quarter of 1997, revenues totaled $229,000, $228,000
 and $229,000, respectively. Net income and income available for
 distribution was $209,000, $213,000 and $212,000, respectively.


 PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
          
           None



                              SIGNATURES
 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
 behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD



                                                                 
        05/12/98              Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Chairman of the Board


                                                                 
        05/12/98              Robert A. Hamstead
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Secretary and Treasurer


May 12, 1998
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 28, 2018

No. 04-18-00344-CV

John B. URBAHNS,

Appellant

v.

LSREF2 COBALT (TX), LLC,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI22479

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s reply brief was due on December 27, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). 

Before the due date, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for an extension of time to file the 

reply brief. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief is due on January 10, 2019. 

See id. R. 38.6(d). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee was established by Pub. L. 98-181, November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.

*Time and Place:*                         Wednesday, September 17, 2008 from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                    

*Agenda:*                         Agenda items include a discussion of the Bank's recent activities, as well as the effects of the “credit crunch” upon U.S. business and exporting.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to September 10, 2008, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3232 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                    

*Further Information:*                         For further information, contact Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3232.                    

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E8-20607 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sherman Howard, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Broomer, J.), rendered June 22, 1988, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the conviction of burglary in the third degree to criminal trespass in the third degree, and vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the evidence was insufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of burglary in the third degree as there was no evidence, or inferences which could reasonably be drawn therefrom, from which the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intended to commit a crime within the building *(see, People v Minor,*150 AD2d 182). There was also no evidence to indicate that the defendant had the tools or equipment necessary to force open the front door or to bend upward the protective gates of the shop. Upon his arrest, neither burglar’s tools nor stolen property were found in the defendant’s possession, and no evidence was presented to negate the defendant’s contention that he crawled under the gates and entered the premises to get out of the cold.

Because the evidence is legally insufficient to establish the critical element of the intent to commit a crime, the defendant’s conviction for burglary in the third degree cannot stand and must be reduced to criminal trespass in the third degree. Since the defendant has already served the maximum sentence which could be imposed for criminal trespass in the third degree, the matter is not remitted for resentencing. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 173 (Friday, September 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine, Special Emphasis Panel, Exploratory Grants for 
CAM Studies of Humans (R21).
    Date: October 20-21, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Jeanette M. Hosseini, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for 
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-9096, 
jeanettehmail.nih.gov.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine, Special Emphasis Panel, Basic and Preclinical 
Research on CAM.
    Date: October 27-28, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott Gaithersburg, 204 Boardwalk Place, 
Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
    Contact Person: Peter Kozel, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
NCCAM, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-5475, 
301-496-8004, kozelpmail.nih.gov.

    Dated: August 27, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20626 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### BRENNAN v. HARDY.

No. 16564.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 23, 1937.

Siegfried B. Christensen, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Morris P. Le Compte, of New Orleans, for appellee.

JANVIER, Judge.

Plaintiff, a white woman 58 years of age, alleges that she was attacked and abused by defendant, a colored woman much younger and stronger, and that the younger woman charged her with having stolen a small bantam rooster which, at the time, she, (plaintiff) was carrying in her arms. She avers that she was in very poor health at the time, and that, as a result of the encounter, her illness was aggravated and her nerves were shattered to such an extent that she' has now become practically a nervous as well as a physical “wreck.” She also alleges that neither the verbal assault nor the physical attack was justified by anything that she had done or said; that the rooster-*542belonged to her, and that therefore the charge that she had stolen it was not true. She seeks from defendant monetary redress in the sum of $300, which, she says, will compensate her for her physical pain and suffering, for the nervous shock, fright, and mental anguish which she sustained.

Defendant avers that the rooster belonged to her and not to plaintiff and she admits that, when she saw it in plaintiff's possession, she claimed it and that, when plaintiff refused to surrender it, she “retained possession” of it. The remaining pertinent allegations of plaintiff’s petition she denies.

In the court below there was judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

The evidence shows clearly that the rooster in question belonged to plaintiff, it having been given to her by a neighborhood grocer some months before, and that defendant, without any cause whatever, took it from her by force and used abusive language towards her.

There is no evidence showing that plaintiff sustained any substantial injury to her body, nerves, or reputation. One hundred dollars should amply compensate her for such temporary mental shock as she sustained and for such other minor damage as she may have suffered.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is annulled, avoided, and reversed, and that there now be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Louise Brennan, and against Anastasie M. Hardy, widow of John Auguste, in the full sum of $100, with legal interest from judicial demand until paid and for all costs.

Reversed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: YOUSIF H. HALLOUM, 

Debtor.

______________________________ 

YOUSIF H. HALLOUM, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

MICHAEL G. KASOLAS, Trustee, 

Appellee. 

No. 14-60086 

BAP No. 14-1170 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Kirscher, Dunn, and Taylor, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Yousif Halloum appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s 

(“BAP”) order dismissing as moot his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-60086 

approving a settlement agreement between Halloum’s chapter 7 trustee and his 

secured creditor. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for 

clear error factual findings about mootness and de novo legal conclusions. Rev Op 

Grp. v. ML Manager LLC (In re Mortgages Ltd.), 771 F.3d 1211, 1215 (9th Cir. 

2014). We affirm.

The BAP properly dismissed Halloum’s appeal as moot because Halloum 

did not object to, or take an appeal from, the bankruptcy court’s order authorizing 

the sale of estate assets. See Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co.

(In re Thorpe Insulation Co.), 677 F.3d 869, 880-81 (9th Cir. 2012) (discussing 

factors to be examined when determining equitable mootness). Halloum has 

permitted such a comprehensive change of circumstances to occur that it is 

inequitable to consider the merits of the appeal. See id. 

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Halloum’s arguments 

regarding the underlying merits of the settlement agreement.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett 

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134766 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134766 COA: 269569 Wayne CC: 05-012184-01 FELTON LEE BURKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 17, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                             26
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                    9150
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 9176
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   9176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              12
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                         9145
<OTHER-SE>                         19
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     9176
<SALES>                           229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  229
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               212
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .14
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment. Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341 
                    *et seq.*), the Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. EDA has initiated separate investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each firm contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firm's workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance, 8/1/2008 Through 8/31/2008
Firm
Address
Date accepted for filing
ProductsDesign Plastics, Inc
3550 Keystone Drive, Omaha, NE 68134
8/27/2008
Parts for transportation industry.Oak Canyon Manufacturing, Inc
3021 N. 29th Dr., Phoenix, AZ 85017-5504
8/28/2008
Wood bookcases, entertainment centers, home office furniture, and some wood non-home office furniture.Rehab Plus Therapeutic Products dba: RPS
726 Donald Preston Dr., Wolfforth, TX 79382
8/27/2008
Fire and chemical protective apparel and safety head gear.DRW Machines, Inc
835 Monty, Shreveport, LA 71107
8/28/2008
Safety and relief valves and casing heads.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Office of Performance Evaluation, Room 7009, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the procedures set forth in Section 315.9 of EDA's final rule (71 FR 56704) for procedures for requesting a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official program number and title of the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance. Dated: September 4, 2008. William P. Kittredge, Program Officer for TAA.


[FR Doc. E8-20976 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-24-P