alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7144 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7144

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a feedback tool for use 
by members of the Armed Forces and their spouses to identify, rate, and 
                compare housing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2022

Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Carbajal) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a feedback tool for use 
by members of the Armed Forces and their spouses to identify, rate, and 
                compare housing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MILITARY HOUSING FEEDBACK TOOL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop a feedback 
tool, such as a rating system or similar mechanism, under which members 
of the Armed Forces and their spouses may anonymously identify, rate, 
and compare housing under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense 
(including privatized military housing).
    (b) Components.--The tool required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following components:
            (1) The capability for users to--
                    (A) rate housing using multiple quality measures, 
                including safety, the timeliness and quality of 
                maintenance services, and the responsiveness of 
                management;
                    (B) upload visual media, including images; and
                    (C) include written comments.
            (2) A comparison feature that can be used to compare 
        ratings for different housing communities.
            (3) Accessibility by members of the Armed Forces, their 
        family members, and members of Congress.
    (c) Reporting Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 
Representatives, and make available to the Secretary of each of the 
military departments, an annual report that includes a summary of the 
data collected using the feedback tool required under this section 
during the year covered by the report.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w5xay



 






EXHIBIT 10.5a




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, Matthew S. Melius (“Executive”) and Metris Companies Inc. (“Company”) (collectively,
the “Parties”) entered into a Change of Control Severance Agreement dated April 21, 1998
(“Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, Section 10.6 of the Agreement provides that such Agreement may be amended by written
instrument executed by the Company and the Executive; and



     WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects;



     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that Section 5.1(d) of the Agreement is amended effective
March 10, 2005, to substitute the word “two” for the word “one” where the latter appears therein;
and



     IT IS FURTHER AGREED that Section 2.6(a) of the Agreement is amended effective March 10, 2005,
to substitute “50%” for “25%” where the latter appears therein.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed this Agreement this
10th day of March, 2005.



	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 	METRIS COMPANIES INC.
	 
	 	 
	/s/Matthew S. Melius

	 	/s/David D. Wesselink
	MATTHEW S. MELIUS

	 	DAVID D. WESSELINK
	

	 	Chairman and CEO
IIA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 78

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 2001

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2002, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 107–44 is further amended by striking
2

HJ 78 RDS

1 the date specified in section 107(c) and inserting in lieu

2 thereof ‘‘December 21, 2001’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 13,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
| INVESTOR CONTACTS:       |                                         |   | MEDIA CONTACT:           |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| David Whitehouse         | Gregory Lundberg                             |   | Brigid Smith             |
| SVP & Treasurer      | Assistant Treasurer & Investor Relations |   | AVP Corp. Communications |
| (203) 614-5708           | (203) 614-5044                               |   | (203) 614-5042           |
| david.whitehouse@ftr.com | greg.lundberg@ftr.com                        |   | brigid.smith@ftr.com     |
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7059 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from enacting certain 

alternative to detention programs for aliens, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2022 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mrs. LESKO, and 

Mr. KELLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from enacting certain alternative to detention programs for aliens, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Alternatives to De5 tention for Illegals Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE TO DE7 TENTION PROGRAMS. 

8 Beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 no Federal funds may be used by the Secretary of HomeVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:48 Mar 15, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7059.IH H7059

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7059 IH

1 land Security to enact any program with respect to the 

2 use of a home curfew or other alternatives to detention 

3 for an alien who is in the custody of the Secretary and 

4 housed at an immigration detention center. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
213 La. 78

#### STATE v. JONES.

No. 38798.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1948.

Charlie Jones, in pro. per.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., and M. E.. Culligan, Asst. Atty Gen., and James T. Burns, Dist. Atty., of Covington, for-plaintiff-appellee.

*382McCALEB, Justice.

Appellant was charged, tried and convicted of the crime of perjury. After imposition of a five year sentence by the trial judge, he. appealed to this court.

No appearance has been made here by appellant, either in person or through counsel, and no bills of exception are found in the record.

Under Article 502 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, error not patent on the face of the record cannot be availed of after verdict unless a bill of exceptions has been reserved to the adverse ruling. And Article 558 declares: “Unless the error is patent on’ the face of the record, an appellate court can not consider or determine any question which was not submitted to and passed upon by the trial judge.”

An examination of the transcript does not reveal error in the proceedings-.

The sentence and conviction are affirmed.

O’N I ELL, C. J., absent.
Exhibit 99.1





Frontier Communications


3 High Ridge Park


Stamford, CT 06905


203.614.5600


www.frontier.com







Frontier Communications Corporation to Participate in Investor Conference







STAMFORD, Conn., September 17, 2013 –Frontier Communications Corporation (NASDAQ: FTR) is scheduled to participate in the Goldman Sachs 22nd Annual Communacopia Conference in New York, NY.  Maggie Wilderotter, Chairman and CEO and Dan McCarthy, President and COO are scheduled to present on September 25, 2013 at 2:05 p.m. Eastern Time.





A live webcast will be available at Frontier’s Investor Relations website under “Webcasts and Presentations.”








About Frontier Communications


Frontier Communications Corporation (NASDAQ: FTR) offers broadband, voice, satellite video, wireless Internet data access, data security solutions, bundled offerings, specialized bundles for residential customers, small businesses and home offices and advanced communications for medium and large businesses in 27 states.  Frontier’s approximately 14,100 employees are based entirely in the United States.  More information is available at www.frontier.com.





INVESTOR CONTACT:


MEDIA CONTACT:Luke Szymczak


Brigid SmithVice President, Investor Relations


AVP, Corp. Comm.(203) 614-5044


(203) 614-5042luke.szymczak@ftr.com


brigid.smith@ftr.com










###
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 13, 2016 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00485-CV
ROBERT O. CANON, Appellant V. BIVINS EXPLORATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-09903



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellant’s June 7, 2016 unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. In
the motion, appellant states the parties have set tled their dispute and he requests we dismiss the
appeal. We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1( A )(1).

160485F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

ROBERT O. CANON, Appellant

No. 05-16-00485-CV V.

BIVINS EXPLORATION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-09903. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered June 13, 2016.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                      [Neose Technologies, Inc. Letterhead]

                                        March 3, 2005

C. Boyd Clarke
President and Chief Executive Officer
Neose Technologies, Inc.
102 Witmer Road
Horsham PA 19044

Dear Boyd:

This letter confirms the recent agreement between you and Neose Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") regarding your compensation from the Company.

You and the Company have agreed that your Base Salary, as defined in the
Employment Agreement between you and the Company, dated March 29, 2002 (the
"Employment Agreement"), for the 12-month period that commenced on March 1,
2005, is $405,000. Effective March 1, 2006, your Base Salary will not be less
than $450,000.

You and the Company have also agreed any Annual Bonus (as defined in the
Employment Agreement) payable to you in respect of 2004 and 2005 will be paid in
the form of Restricted Stock Units (as defined in the Company's Equity Incentive
Plan (the "Plan")), subject to the terms of the Plan and an award agreement
that, in the case of RSUs awarded in respect of a 2004 annual bonus, is
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and, in the case of RSUs
awarded in respect of a 2005 annual bonus, is substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit B. In addition, your bonus target for 2005 only will be 93.75%
of the sum of (i) your Base Salary plus (ii) $45,000.

In addition, in recognition of the changes to your cash compensation described
above, the Company will grant to you, effective today, that number of RSUs as is
determined by dividing $45,000 by today's closing price of our stock, subject to
the terms of the Plan and an award agreement substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit B and subject to your execution of this letter.

Your signature below constitutes your written consent to the reduction of your
Base Salary and to the payment of your 2004 Annual Bonus and your 2005 Annual
Bonus in Restricted Stock Units, each as described above. Therefore, neither the
reduction of Base Salary described above nor the payment of your 2004 Annual
Bonus and your 2005 in the form of Restricted Stock Units will constitute Good
Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement) for your termination of
employment with the Company.

Except to the extent modified by this letter, the Employment Agreement continues
in full force and effect.

Please execute this letter in the space provided below to acknowledge the
foregoing agreements.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        /s/ Debra J. Poul
                                        Debra J. Poul
                                        Senior Vice President & General Counsel
Acknowledged and Agreed:

/s/ C. Boyd Clarke
------------------
C. Boyd Clarke
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

** **

** **

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement")dated asof August 1, 2018 by and among Deutsche Mortgage& Asset Receiving Corporation asDepositor, KeyBank; NationalAssociation as Master Servicer and Westside NYC Multifamily Portfolio SpecialServicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationasTrustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian, and ParkBridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer relating to the CD 2018-CD7Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates,Series 2018-CD7 **(CD****2018-CD7)** 

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performance ofsuch servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of August 24, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6933 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6933

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2022

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require reporting relating to 
                    certain cost-share requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cost-Share Accountability Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16352) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Reporting.--Not later than 120 days after the enactment of 
the Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2022, and at least quarterly 
thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Science, 
Space, and Technology and Committee on Appropriations of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and 
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and shall make publicly 
available, a report on the use by the Department during the period 
covered by the report of the authority to reduce or eliminate cost-
sharing requirements provided by subsections (b)(3) or (c)(2).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [UTU81172] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with Title IV of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act (Pub. L. 97-451), Delta Petroleum Corporation timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease UTU81172 for lands in Grand County, Utah, and it was accompanied by all required rentals and royalties accruing from April 1, 2008, the date of termination. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kent Hoffman, Deputy State Director, Division of Lands and Minerals at (801) 539-4080. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The $500 administrative fee for the lease has been paid and the lessee has reimbursed the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of publishing this notice.                 

Having met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the lease, effective April 1, 2008, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. 

Kent Hoffman, 

Deputy State Director, Division of Lands and Minerals.

[FR Doc. E8-20696 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7137 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7137

      To enact House Resolution 895, One Hundred Tenth Congress, 
 (establishing the Office of Congressional Ethics) into permanent law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2022

Mr. O'Halleran introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To enact House Resolution 895, One Hundred Tenth Congress, 
 (establishing the Office of Congressional Ethics) into permanent law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Legislating and Ethical 
Accountability Now Act'' or the ``CLEAN Act''.

SEC. 2. ENACTING HOUSE RESOLUTION 895 INTO PERMANENT LAW.

    House Resolution 895, One Hundred Tenth Congress, is hereby enacted 
into permanent law, except that--
            (1) the Office of Congressional Ethics shall be treated as 
        a standing committee of the House for purposes of section 
        202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 
        4301(i));
            (2) references to the Committee on Standards of Official 
        Conduct shall be construed as references to the Committee on 
        Ethics;
            (3) the second sentence of section 1(b)(6)(A) shall not 
        apply;
            (4) members subject to section 1(b)(6)(B) may be 
        reappointed for a second additional term;
            (5) any individual who is the subject of a preliminary 
        review or second-phase review by the board shall be informed of 
        the right to be represented by counsel and invoking that right 
        should not be held negatively against them; and
            (6) the Office may not take any action that would deny any 
        person any right or protection provided under the Constitution 
        of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
195 La. 376

#### HAAS v. REESE et al.

No. 35725.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 1940.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1940.

Gordon B. Hyde and John T. Charbon-net, both of New Orleans, for appellants.

Couvillon & Couvillon and Joffrion & Bordelon, all of Marksville, and McCoy & King, of Lake Charles, for appellee.

FOURNET, Justice.

This is a companion suit to the case of Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese et al., 196 So. 558, and the opinion in that case disposes of the issues raised here.

The fact that the plaintiff in this case acquired royalty deeds from seven of the co-owners, in addition to mineral leases from three of them, without the consent or concurrence of the other co-owners, does not make any difference in the result, for the reason, as explained in the Amer-ada case, that *where property is held in in-división between several co-ozvners, none can confer rights on the entirety of the common property without the consent of all the others.*

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court is annulled and set aside, and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff’s suit is dismissed at his cost.

O’NIELL, C. J., docs not take part.
Order entered December 3, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00319 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 17 - 00832

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s Rule 9.2(c)(5) motion for leave to late file her corrected brief

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.2(c)(5). We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received December 2, 2020 filed as of the date of this order. Appellees’ brief(s) shall be filed no later than January 4, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE