alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of briefing and meeting.

# Date and Time:

 Friday, September 12, 2008; 9:30 a.m.

# Place:

 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Briefing Agenda

### Topic: Encouraging Minority Students To Pursue Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman

II. Speakers' Presentations

III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director

IV. Adjourn Briefing

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of Minutes
      - July 11, 2008 Meeting
      - August 19, 2008 Meeting
      - September 6, 2008 Meeting

III. Announcements

IV. Staff Director's Report

V. Program Planning
      - FY 2008 Statutory Report: Enforcing Prohibitions of Religious Discrimination in Prison
      - FY 2009 Briefing Topics
      - FY 2009 Statutory Report

VI. Future Agenda Items

VII. Adjourn

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: 

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8582.

Dated: September 3, 2008.

David Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E8-20740 Filed 9-3-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.5**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18**

**of the United States Code**

 

I, Thomas M. O’Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSEG Power LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG Power LLC.

 

 

|   |   |   | /s/ Thomas M. O’Flynn |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |   |   | **Thomas M. O’Flynn** |
|   |   |   | PSEG Power LLC             |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer    |
|   |   |   | November 1, 2006           |

 

 

----
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6983 

To require the President to transmit to Congress a report on existing and 

needed authority to respond to a severe energy supply interruption. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2022 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the President to transmit to Congress a report 

on existing and needed authority to respond to a severe 

energy supply interruption. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responding to Inter5 ruptions in the Supply of Energy to Undermine Putin 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘RISE UP Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REPORT ON RESPONSE AUTHORITY TO SEVERE EN8 ERGY SUPPLY INTERRUPTIONS. 

9 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

10 of enactment of this Act, the President, in consultation 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6983 IH

1 with the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of State, the 

2 Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, 

3 and the head of any other Federal agency the President 

4 determines appropriate, shall transmit to Congress a re5 port that— 

6 (1) summarizes the existing authorities of the 

7 Federal Government to respond to a severe energy 

8 supply interruption; 

9 (2) provides an assessment of whether such ex10 isting authorities provide for an adequate response 

11 to a severe energy supply interruption; and 

12 (3) identifies any additional statutory authority 

13 needed to allow the Federal Government to better 

14 respond to a severe energy supply interruption. 

15 (b) DEFINITION OF SEVERE ENERGY SUPPLY INTER16 RUPTION.—In this section, the term ‘‘severe energy supply 

17 interruption’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

18 3(8) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 

19 U.S.C. 6202(8)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.21  


March 9,
2004 


Irene
A. Chow, Ph.D. 


Dear
Irene: 


        The
purpose of this letter is to set forth the terms of your continued employment with Genelabs Technologies, Inc. 



	

Position Title:	
 	

Chairman of the Board of Directors.
	

Reporting:	
 	

You will report directly to the Board of Directors.
	

Effective Dates:	
 	

This change is effective beginning March 8, 2004.
	

Compensation:	
 	

Your base salary will be $16,667 per month ($200,000 annually), paid semi-monthly. Your employment status will be "exempt, regular part-time." Compensation will be reviewed by the Board of Directors at least annually in the first calendar quarter of
each year.
	

 	
 	

Upon the effective date of this change, you will no longer participate in the company's Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan. All amounts currently granted to you under the Long-Term portion of the plan will immediately become 100% vested. You may
receive payment of those amounts at the next payroll date following the change, or on any other schedule thereafter, and in any increments, at your discretion.
	

Benefits:	
 	

You will continue to be eligible for all employee benefits programs that are applicable to regular part-time employees. In accordance with the company's regular part-time employees' benefit plan, you will no longer participate in the following
programs: group life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and long term disability insurance.
	

 	
 	

All accrued but unused vacation as of March 8, 2004 will be paid to you at the company's next regular payroll date. You will not accrue further vacation or sick time.
	

Stock:	
 	

As long as you continue to be an employee or member of Genelabs' Board of Directors, stock options granted remain exercisable in accordance with their terms. You may receive additional stock options grants at the discretion of the Board of Directors
under the Corporation's stock option plans. As an employee of the Corporation, you are not eligible for the automatic option grants for non-employee directors under the Corporation's 2001 Stock Option Plan.
	

Change In Control:	
 	

The Agreement dated January 3, 2002 with respect to a change in control of the Corporation will remain in effect in accordance with its terms while the Chairman is an employee.
	

Board of Directors:	
 	

You will continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors. While you are also an employee of the company, you will not receive the standard stipend for attendance at Board of Directors meetings.
	

At-Will Employment:	
 	

Your employment continues to be at will, which means you or Genelabs may terminate it at any time.





        Please
indicate your agreement to these terms by signing below. 









	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	

 	

Lynn Hughes

Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Services
	

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:	

 
	

By:	

 	

 
	 	
 Irene A. Chow, Ph.D.	 
	

Date:
May 29 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TAMMY MCGEE QUISENBE RRY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00511

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order ap pellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, George S. Wiedemann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 8, 2004



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ George S. Wiedemann                                  
|George S. Wiedemann President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles F. Anderson, Jr., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in decision at suppression court, Connell, J. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—arson, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3021728-SEP-201207:59 AM
No. 72-1188.

#### Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al. *v.*Reservists Committee to Stop the War et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC); Notice of reestablishment.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in accordance with section 102-3.65, title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the FAA gives notice it is re-establishing the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) for a 2-year period. The Committee's primary purpose is to provide the public with an earlier opportunity to participate in the FAA's rulemaking process. It will continue to operate in accordance with the rules of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Department of Transportation, FAA Committee Management Order (1110.30C). This notice replaces the notice published on April 4, 2008 (73 FR 18602).

For further information about the ARAC, please contact Ms. Gerri Robinson, FAA Office of Rulemaking, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone number: 202-267-9678.

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 3, 2008.

Pamela A. Hamilton-Powell,

Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. E8-20745 Filed 9-3-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

DENISE V. SIEGFELDT MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2270-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 11, 1996 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Walter J. Ford, Judge Denise V. Siegfeldt, pro se . Cheryl A. Wilkerson, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; Lisa J. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Denise V. Siegfeldt petitioned for a judicial review of a decision from the Virginia Employment Commission. Because her petition did not name a party required by the statute and was not served within a reasonable time, the circuit court dismissed the petition. Siegfeldt appeals from this order. We affirm. "When the legislature has prescribed limitations within which the right of appeal may be exercised, such limitations are exclusive, and the court cannot modify or enlarge them without express statutory authority." Blankenship v. Virginia Unemployment Compensation Comm'n , 177 Va. 250, 254, 13 S.E.2d 409, 411 (1941). Upon review of the record, we find no reversible error in the circuit court judge's ruling.- 2 - Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Delroy Roberts, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered April 8, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As part of his plea bargain, the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the ruling by the Supreme Court which denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officials *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1).

We have reviewed the remaining portion of the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see,*
      *337
      *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 15 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 15

 Designating the square dance as the national folk dance of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2001

    Mr. Saxton introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the square dance as the national folk dance of the United 
                                States.

Whereas square dancing has been a popular tradition in America since early 
        colonial days;
Whereas square dancing has attained a revered status as part of the folklore of 
        this Nation;
Whereas square dancing is a joyful expression of the vibrant spirit of the 
        people of the United States;
Whereas square dancing promotes the practice of good manners and proper 
        etiquette;
Whereas square dancing is a traditional form of family recreation that fosters 
        family unity, a basic strength of this Nation;
Whereas square dancing embodies democratic principles by dissolving arbitrary 
        social distinctions among its participants; and
Whereas it is fitting that the square dance be added to the array of symbols of 
        our national character and pride: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the square dance is 
designated the national folk dance of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 34.2**

** **

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended November 3, 2019, except for servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended November 3, 2019, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 20, 2019

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6172

ROBIN VIRGINIA MEADOWS COLLINS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

PAT GREEN; ELLIOTT PANNELL; H. M. EDWARDS, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03111-D) 

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Robin Virginia Meadows Collins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Robin Virginia Meadows Collins seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice her civil rights 

action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state 

a claim on which relief may be granted. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the 

deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by 

the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order 

Collins seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 

(4th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

2
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Max A. Coon, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 19, 2003

                                                     /s/ Max A. Coon
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Max A. Coon
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.