alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
230 La. 720

#### Semp RUSS et al. v. Mrs. Marie Scheen STEPHENS et al.

No. 41157.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1956.

Gahagan & Gahagan, by Russell E. Gaha-gan, Natchitoches, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Harry S. Stephens, Shreveport, for defendants-appellees.

HAMITER, Justice.

From a judgment dismissing this jactitation action on an exception of want of possession (a tract of land in Red River Parish containing 74.48 acres is involved) plaintiffs appealed to this court. Subsequently, all parties litigant filed here a joint motion praying for the transfer of the appeal to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, they alleging that “the record in this case fails to show that this Honorable Court has jurisdiction.”

The motion is well taken. On the important question of value there is in the record only a stipulation of counsel reading: “It is admitted by counsel for both plaintiffs and defendants that the value of the property in dispute is in excess of two thousand dollars.” But this court has repeatedly held that such a stipulation is of no effect in determining appellate jurisdiction, the conferring of it by consent of the parties being impossible. Tucker v. Woodside, 218 La. 708, 50 So.2d 814; Beene v. Pardue, 223 La. 417, 65 So.2d 897; Cas-tleberry v. Ethridge, 223 La. 466, 63 So.2d 138; Wainer v. Kirn, 223 La. 669, 66 So.2d 587; and H. G. Hill Stores Realty Company, Inc., v. Latter, 227 La. 791, 80 So.2d 410.

*214For the reasons assigned it is ordered that this cause be transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, pursuant to the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:4441 and 13:-4442, the record to be filed in such court by appellants within thirty days from the date on which this decree shall become final; otherwise the appeal shall stand dismissed. Appellants shall pay the costs of the appeal to this court, and all other costs shall await final disposition of the case.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THECHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PrecisionCastparts Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal period ended January 1,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, William D. Larsson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Date: February 17, 2006

 
| /s/ William D. Larsson    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| William D. Larsson        |
| Senior Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer   |

 

1

----
#### Ian GILEADI, Appellant, v. J. Calvin MILLS and Vera S. Mills, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

July 27, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10Q for
the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jules L. Fisher, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.





Date: June 8, 2007      By:  /s/ Jules L. Fisher
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           JULES L. FISHER
                           Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

                                       27
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3289-EM]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3289-EM), dated August 29, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 2, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas for which the President declared an emergency on 
August 29, 2008:

    Acadia, Allen, Ascension, Assumption, Avoyelles, Beauregard, 
Cameron, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Iberia, 
Iberville, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Lafayette, Lafourche, 
Livingston, Orleans, Plaquemines, Pointe Coupee, Rapides, Sabine, 
St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist, St. 
Landry, St. Martin, St. Mary, Terrebonne, Vermilion, Vernon, West 
Baton Rouge, and West Feliciana Parishes for debris removal 
(Category A) under the Public Assistance program (already designated 
for emergency protective measures (Category B), including direct 
Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-20815 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this report on Form 10-Q for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





Steven J. Johnston, the chief executive officer, and Michael J. Sewell, the chief financial officer, of Cincinnati Financial Corporation each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                   
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cincinnati Financial Corporation.




Date: July 30, 2019


/S/ Steven J. JohnstonSteven J. Johnston, FCAS, MAAA, CFA, CERAPresident and Chief Executive Officer/S/ Michael J. SewellMichael J. Sewell, CPAChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Accounting Officer)
#### COOK et al. v. CROW et al. (MARION STATE BANK, Intervener).

No. 6240.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 29, 1940.

Barksdale, Warren & Barksdale, of Rus-ton, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. B. Crow, of Shreveport, for defendant-appellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

The judgment rendered in this cause by the district court on April 20, 1939, and read, signed and filed on June 19, 1939, condemned defendant J. B. Crow to pay to plaintiffs a certain stated sum, with interest and attorney’s fees; but plaintiffs’ demands against defendant Mrs. Lecy J. Crow were therein rejected.

On an appeal to this court prosecuted by the said J. B. Crow, we amended the judgment by reducing the sum awarded. 194 So. 455. The demands respecting Mrs. Crow were not then before us. Our decree has since become final.

On June 18, 1940, plaintiffs petitioned the district court for an order of devolutive appeal, returnable to this court, from the judgment in so far as it rejected their damands against defendant Mrs. Lecy J. Crow. The appeal was granted, conditioned on bond in the sum of $100 being furnished. A bond for this amount was filed on June 26, 1940.'

In this court, the said Mrs. Lecy J. Crow has moved in writing that the appeal be dismissed for the reason, among others, that: “The appeal bond herein was not filed with the Clerk of the District Court at Farmerville until June 26, 1940, seven days after the one year period of limitation had run within which to take and perfect an appeal, and said delay in filing said appeal bond is attributable to the plaintiffs and appellants in this cause, and appearers specially plead the prescription of one year in bar of this appeal.”

The motion to dismiss the appeal is, we think, well founded, and it must be sustained.

To perfect an appeal the required bond must be filed within the time pre*414scribed by law. The order granting it is inoperative and without effect until the filing occurs. Lafayette et al. v. Farr et al., 162 La. 385, 110 So. 624. The bond in the instant case was not timely furnished, as more than a year had elapsed when its presentation took place.

The appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 680 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.680

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
    For the relief of Arpita Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, and Vandana 
                                Kurdekar.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ARPITA KURDEKAR, GIRISH 
KURDEKAR, AND VANDANA KURDEKAR.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Arpita Kurdekar, Girish 
Kurdekar, and Vandana Kurdekar shall each be eligible for issuance of 
an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 
lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application 
for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Arpita Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, or 
Vandana Kurdekar enters the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 
entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Arpita Kurdekar, Girish 
Kurdekar, and Vandana Kurdekar, the Secretary of State shall instruct 
the proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Arpita 
Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, and Vandana Kurdekar shall not, by virtue of 
such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under 
the Immigration and Nationality Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (618)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,829
<PP&E>                                           5,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,951)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,502
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,392)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,997
<SALES>                                         24,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,019
<CGS>                                           18,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,966)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,966)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.00)
        

</TABLE>
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00566- CR
Joe Ed Davis, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 391 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 2-0 989- SB , TH E H ONO RAB LE TH OM AS J. GO SSETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant J oe Ed Davis seeks to appea l from a judgme nt of conviction for indece ncy with a child by sexual contac t. See Tex. Penal Code § 21.11(a) (1). Appellant’ s s en t en ce was i m p o s ed on April 14, 2014. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on May 13, 2014
. There fore , the deadline for perf ecting appea l was J uly 14, 2014. See Tex. R. Ap p . P
. 2 6
. 2(a) (1). Notice of appea l was filed in the trial court on September 4, 2014. On September 8, 2014, appellant filed a motion reque sting a n extension of tim e for

filing the notice of a

ppeal in this Court. The Rules of Appellate Procedur e allow an appellate court to extend the time to file the notice of appea l if, within 15 day s afte r the deadline for filing the notice of appea l, the appellant: (1) files the not ice of

appea l in the t rial court, and (2) files a motion for ex tension in the appellate court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Her e, both the notice of appea l and the m o tion for extension of t i m e wer e filed more than 15 day s afte r the deadline for filing the notice of appea l: t h e n o t i ce o fappea l was filed in the trial court 52 day s afte r t he deadline, t he mot ion for ex tension was filed in

this Court 56 day s afte r the deadline. Thus, both are untimely and we are without authority to extend the time to file the notice o f ap peal. See Strange v. State , 258 S.W .3d 184, 186–87 (Tex. App.—Houston [1stDist.] 2007, pet. re f’d) (“The limit ed, 15-day extended time pe riod applies to both the notice [of appea l] and the motion for extension; both must be filed within the 15-day time period.” ). The motion for e x tension is denied.

The t i m el y fi l i n g of a written notice of appea l is essential to vest this Court with jurisdiction. Castil lo v. St a t e , 3 6 9 S .W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Be cause appellant failed t o t imely file a notice of ap p eal in compliance with Rule 26 of the Rules of Appellate Procedur e, we lack jurisdiction t o dispose of this attempted appea l in any manner other than by dismiss ing it for want of jurisdiction. See Castillo , 369 S.W .3d at 198. Acc ording ly , the appe al is dismis sed.

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: September

19, 2014 Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, IndyMac Bank has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all material
      respects throughout the reporting period.


                                By: /s/ Bart Vincent
                                    ----------------------
                                    Bart Vincent
                                    SVP, CFO Home Loan Servicing


Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           November 29 , 2007

Ref:            679 - INDS 2006-A CES (UBS)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Blake, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|May 9, 2006                                          
|                                                     
|/s/    RONALD L. BLAKE                               
|Ronald L. Blake President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: February 11, 2011                         /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]