alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003                       /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                              ---------------------------
                                              David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                              and Controller (serving as
                                              Chief Financial Officer)
#### Ernest KOVACS, Appellant, v. Bette KOVACS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

June 6, 1956.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered November 7, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence, identification testimony, and statements which he made to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to suppress the physical evidence, identification testimony, and the inculpatory statements which he made to the police *(see, People v Sobotker,*43 NY2d 559; *see also, People v Belton,*55 NY2d 49; *People v Gonzalez,*39 NY2d 122).

The defendant contends that the prosecution failed to adduce sufficient proof to establish that he forcibly stole the complainant’s pocketbook. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. On July 24, 1984, the defendant sat on the complainant in the front seat of her parked car with his hand around her throat, which he pressed until she let go of her pocketbook. She sustained bruises to her neck, upper body, hip and thigh, and a scratch on her right cheek. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant further contends that the trial court erred by failing to charge the jury with respect to the lesser included offense of grand larceny in the third degree. In view of the injuries sustained by the complainant, there is no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant committed a larceny but not a robbery *(see, People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61). Thus, the court’s ruling was proper.

*420We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention that the sentence imposed was excessive and find it to be without merit *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.1


 


Named Executive
Officer Salary Actions


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  2004 Salary*

  	
   

  	
  Increase

  	
   

  	
  Percentage Increase

  	
   

  	
  2005 Salary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  John D. Finnegan

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,200,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  75,000

  	
   

  	
  6.3

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  1,275,000

  	
   

  
	
  John J. Degnan

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  585,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  25,000

  	
   

  	
  4.3

  	
  %

  	
   

  	
  610,000

  	
   

  
	
  Thomas F.
  Motamed

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  655,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  30,000

  	
   

  	
  4.6

  	
  %

  	
   

  	
  685,000

  	
   

  
	
  Michael O’Reilly

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  600,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  	
  5.8

  	
  %

  	
   

  	
  635,000

  	
   

  
	
  Paul J. Krump

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  395,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  22,500

  	
   

  	
  5.7

  	
  %

  	
   

  	
  417,500

  	
   

  



 










*         Salary increases take effect April 1 of
each year.
#### Leonard McComb, Appellant, v Town of Greenville, Respondent.

In an action for a judgment declaring a municipal contract void, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), dated March 17, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as time barred.

*370Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff challenges the defendant town’s award of a contract to a third party to remove tires and other debris from the plaintiff’s property. In a prior proceeding brought by the plaintiff to invalidate a local ordinance regulating unsafe properties within the town, this court upheld the ordinance and the town’s actions declaring his property a fire and health hazard and preparing contingency plans for its cleanup *(McComb v Town of Greenville,*160 AD2d 779). To clean up the plaintiff’s property, the town solicited bids, and, on August 24, 1988, awarded the contract in question. The town contends that the instant action challenging that contract, was commenced on January 30, 1989, and is barred by the applicable four-month Statute of Limitations.

In a declaratory judgment action such as this, the applicable Statute of Limitations is determined by the substantive nature of the claim *(see, Solnick v Whalen,*49 NY2d 224; *see also, Press v County of Monroe,*50 NY2d 695). If a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 would have been appropriate to settle a dispute with a governmental entity, the period of limitations governing proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 is applicable *(see, Solnick v Whalen, supra; see also, Lenihan v City of New York,*58 NY2d 679; *Press v County of Monroe, supra).*The plaintiff’s challenge to the town’s award of the contract was in the nature of a CPLR article 78 proceeding to review an administrative and quasi-judicial discretionary function exercised by town officials. Thus, the applicable Statute of Limitations is four months *(see,*CPLR 217; *Solnick v Whalen, supra; see also, Matter of Conduit & Found. Corp. v Metropolitan Tr. Auth.,*66 NY2d 144; *Lenihan v City of New York, supra; Press v County of Monroe, supra; Matter of Marvec-All State v Purcell,*110 Misc 2d 67, *affd*87 AD2d 593).

The plaintiff contends that his action commenced on January 30, 1989, is not time barred since the four-month Statute of Limitations should be measured from October 18, 1988, the date the town actually executed the contract, rather than from August 24, 1988, the date the town awarded the contract. We disagree. The four-month period must be measured from August 24, 1988, since on that date the plaintiff knew or should have known he was aggrieved, and the town’s awarding of the contract was, for purposes of CPLR 217, a final and binding determination *(see, Matter of Metropolitan Package Store Assn. v Duffy,*143 AD2d 832, 833). Since the town approved the bid on August 24, 1988, and since the action was not commenced until January 30, 1989, the action is time *371barred. Mangano, P. J., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit (4)(xvii)



April 2, 1998



Mr. Joseph J. Berns
Vice President - Finance 
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. 
104 Revere Street
Canton, MA 02021

Dear Joe:

This letter will serve to amend the Master Security Agreements dated as of 
December 29, 1995 and January 27, 1997, respectively, by and between General 
Electric Capital Corporation ("Secured Party") and Plymouth Rubber Company, 
Inc. ("Debtor") as follows:

1.      Section 10(a) is hereby amended to read as follows:

	    (a) At all times during the term of the Security Agreement, Debtor 
	shall maintain: (i) Minimum Working Capital, per the attached schedule, 
	(ii) Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage ratio, per the attached schedule.

All other terms and conditions will remain in full force and effect.  This 
Amendment is effective beginning February 27, 1998.

This amendment is subject to the receipt of a $33,750 amendment fee.

Sincerely,



Robert R. Blee
Senior Risk Analyst

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:

PLYMOUTH RUBBER COMPANY, INC.



By:______________________________

Name:____________________________  

Title:___________________________

Date:____________________________











				SCHEDULE A




			  1st qtr 98   2nd qtr 98   3rd qtr 98   4th qtr 98



Working Capital            1,000,000    1,105,000      245,000      630,000

Fixed Charge Coverage        1.24X        1.0X           1.0X         1.0X



			  1st qtr 99  2nd qtr 99    3rd qtr 99   4th qtr 99

Working Capital            1,000,000    1,375,000     1,750,000   2,500,000

Fixed Charge Coverage        1.25X       1.50X thereafter



			  1st qtr 20   2nd qtr 20   3rd qtr 20     

Working Capital           3,000,000   3,500,000      3,750,000 thereafter
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00727-CV

SONIA BARBOZA, Appellant 

V.

MORRELL MASONRY SUPPLY, INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 129th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-20565 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 9, 2018. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the 

court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On September 19, 2018, notification was transmitted to all parties of the 

court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen 
2

days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this 

court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). 

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 48

Authorizing the President to issue to the late Colonel William Mitchell,

United States Army, a posthumous commission in the grade of brigadier

general.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2001

Mr. HUNTER (for himself and Mr. BASS) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

JOINT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the President to issue to the late Colonel William

Mitchell, United States Army, a posthumous commission

in the grade of brigadier general.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. POSTHUMOUS PROMOTION FOR COLONEL WIL4 LIAM MITCHELL TO GRADE OF BRIGADIER

5 GENERAL.

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized to

7 issue to the late Colonel William Mitchell, United States

8 Army, a posthumous commission in the grade of brigadier
2

•HJ 48 IH

1 general, effective as of the date of his death on February

2 19, 1936.

3 (b) PROHIBITION OF BENEFITS.—No person shall be

4 entitled to receive any bonus, gratuity, pay, allowances,

5 or other financial benefit by reason of the enactment of

6 this joint resolution.

Æ
Presidential Documents

51897 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 173 

Friday, September 5, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8285 of September 3, 2008 

National Historically Black Colleges And Universities Week, 

2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) are helping to extend 

lifelines of learning throughout our country. During Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week, we pay tribute to these distinguished institutions. 

Our Nation’s HBCUs help unlock the great potential within students by 

providing quality higher education to traditionally underserved communities. 

By offering all students an opportunity to develop their skills and talents, 

HBCUs are helping more Americans realize the promise of our Nation. 

My Administration is committed to promoting equal opportunities and access 

to higher education for all students. Since 2001, funding for HBCUs and 

Historically Black Graduate Institutions has increased. Additionally, the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 makes college more affordable 

for low-income students by increasing funding for Federal Pell Grants by 

more than $11 billion. The Act also helps HBCUs increase educational 

opportunities in the critical fields of math, science, technology, and foreign 

languages. By educating all of America’s students, we are investing in our 

next generation of leaders and contributing to a more hopeful people and 

a more prosperous America. 

Throughout this week, we renew the call for this country to never rest 

until equality is real, opportunity is universal, and all citizens can realize 

their dreams. We also recognize our country’s HBCUs and their important 

role in making these goals a reality. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 7 through 

September 13, 2008, as National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 

Week. I call upon public officials, educators, librarians, and all the people 

of the United States to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities in respect and appreciation for the contributions 

these valuable institutions and their graduates have made to our country. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0
51898 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 173 / Friday, September 5, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of 

September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E8–20794 

Filed 9–4–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 498 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6964 

[Report No. 117–681] 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for lands held in trust for the 

Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2022 

Ms. STRICKLAND (for herself, Mr. KILMER, and Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 30, 2022 

Additional sponsors: Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, 

Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mrs. RODGERS of Washington, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. 

DELBENE, and Ms. SCHRIER

DECEMBER 30, 2022 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 

printed 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6964 RH

A BILL 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for lands held in 

trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation. 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6964 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS 

4 RESERVATION LEASING AUTHORITY. 

5 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au6 gust 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended in the second 

7 sentence by inserting ‘‘, land held in trust for the Confed8 erated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation’’ after ‘‘Crow 

9 Tribe of Montana’’. 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 498 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6964 

[Report No. 117–681] 

A BILL 

To authorize leases of up to 99 years for lands held 

halis Reservation. in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the CheDECEMBER 30, 2022 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
OFFiCE OF **T?IE** ATTORNEY **GENERAL** OFTEXAS AUSTIN

nonorable V. A. (;ollioa, kember I 80~~6 of tiegents 

### 0rthe state

‘Peachare Colleges Of G.xam ’ Livingston, Tarrae,

**that** .yotlr 1508 aertaio impr **Texas,** the a in sav naraom, in should be paid wascompleted, warthe amountaped to be **irered** to Mr. lIartin, who themat a diaaouat of took in oelling~hio ware 0piniQn of this Departsther the Board mustor 0011

e .eurrent rumw , **er** is **reaeirable** by law as money, 

### om 0rnotes or aoin. hull V. ~First hational bank, 1.230. 6. 106, 31L. ed, ~97. hr. gartin Is perhaps laboring under the misapprebeuclion that a warrant uponthe Treasury of the State aonetituted 

## l paVmentu of the State’ B obligation. This i8 inaorreat ; a warrant is efn;ply an order upon the state %easurer to pay, out of appropriated funds, as ana whenthe moneys**are** arallable, a specified 6umof money. Th1.sis the mavner prescribed by lau for the paymentof obligations OPthe state,, and all persons **entering** into covtraats with the State are charged with knwledge that paymentwill beUonoroble v. A, Colllna - 

### page a

Mae in~suah mannsr ae aad wheamonkys**are** onhand **in** the Treasury. such rarrants, vhenfunds are available for-their psyment in 

### due order, are psid in sourrent
runcw. It has long been settled in this State that the holdsr of a 

### warrantupon the Treasury of' the State, iasusd **by** 

### the Comptroller, **who** sells the **warrant** at a dimaount, aannot hold the **State** liable 

### forthe loss he thus **suetains;** that an orriasr or **the** State has no pmer to obligate the State to pay **auah** least ana that the **payment** of such loss in prohlbitsd by Ssctlon 44

or Artiole 3 

### or the State Con8tltutl0n. State t. Wllcon, 81 f. 291, 9 2. w. l26.

very truly yours ATl'OjblSXPltYEiULOBTR2AF.t

2. 1. R'alrahlld AssLstant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                       861
<INVENTORY>                                     25,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,003
<PP&E>                                         134,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,567
<BONDS>                                         20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,549
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,887
<SALES>                                        459,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,644
<CGS>                                          391,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  391,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,295
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.17


</TABLE>