alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21054]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending August 22, 2008

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2007-0066.
    Date Filed: August 19, 2008.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 9, 2008.
    Description: Application of Hainan Airlines Co. Limited (``Hainan 
Airlines'') requesting an exemption and amended foreign air carrier 
permit authorizing it to engage in charter foreign air transportation 
of persons, property and mail between a point or points in the People's 
Republic of China, on the one hand, and a point or points in the United 
States, on the other hand, and to engage in other charters. Hainan 
Airlines also requests a statement of authorization under Part 212 to 
perform a single charter flight between October 19-21, 2008.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E8-21054 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

the right to vote.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 6, 2001

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding the right to vote.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States:
2

•HJ 72 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. All citizens of the United States, who

3 are eighteen years of age or older, shall have the right

4 to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in

5 which the citizen resides. The right to vote shall not be

6 denied or abridged by the United States, any State, or

7 any other public or private person or entity, except that

8 the United States or any State may establish regulations

9 narrowly tailored to produce efficient and honest elections.

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. Each State shall administer public elec11 tions in the State in accordance with election performance

12 standards established by the Congress. The Congress shall

13 reconsider such election performance standards at least

14 once every four years to determine if higher standards

15 should be established to reflect improvements in methods

16 and practices regarding the administration of elections.

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. Each State shall provide any eligible

18 voter the opportunity to register and vote on the day of

19 any public election.

20 ‘‘SECTION 4. Each State and the District constituting

21 the seat of Government of the United States shall estab22 lish and abide by rules for appointing its respective num23 ber of Electors. Such rules shall provide for the appoint24 ment of Electors on the day designated by the Congress

25 for holding an election for President and Vice President
3

•HJ 72 IH

1 and shall ensure that each Elector votes for the candidate

2 for President and Vice President who received a majority

3 of the popular vote in the State or District.

4 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress shall have power to en5 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6793 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6793

 To amend title 28, United States Code, to include a Federal Public or 
     Community Defender as a nonvoting member of the United States 
             Sentencing Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2022

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to include a Federal Public or 
     Community Defender as a nonvoting member of the United States 
             Sentencing Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL DEFENDER AS A NONVOTING MEMBER OF THE UNITED STATES 
              SENTENCING COMMISSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 991(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``one nonvoting 
        member.'' and inserting ``2 nonvoting members.''; and
            (2) in the fifth sentence, by striking ``shall be an ex 
        officio, nonvoting member'' and inserting ``and a Federal 
        Public or Community Defender designated by the Defender 
        Services Advisory Group, shall be ex officio, nonvoting members 
        of the Commission.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 235(b)(5) of the Sentencing 
Reform Act of 1984 (18 U.S.C. 3551 note) is amended, in the last 
sentence, by striking ``nine members, including two ex officio, 
nonvoting members'' and inserting ``10 members, including 3 ex officio, 
nonvoting members.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Klein *v.*Mumford.

(No. 24111

Decided October 11, 1933.)

*Mr. William E. Minshall*and *Messrs. Klein S Diehm,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Samuel Goldstein*and *Messrs. Rocker & Schwarts,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby affirmed, for the reason that the record presents only a question of fact.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Beyes and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52725-52726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Issue Committee.

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned

[[Page 52726]]

Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted via telephone 
conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Issue Committee will be held Wednesday, October 8, 2008, from 1 
to 2 p.m. Eastern Time via a telephone conference call. The public is 
invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 
minutes. For information or to confirm attendance, notification of 
intent to attend the meeting must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. 
Jenkins may be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-2085. Send 
written comments to Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 
625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call 
meeting must be made in advance.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-20941 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 113

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of Patsy Takemoto Mink.

Whereas Patsy Takemoto Mink was one of the country’s

leading voices for women’s rights, civil rights, and working families and was devoted to raising living standards

and providing economic and educational opportunity to

all Americans;
2

•HJ 113 EH

Whereas Patsy Takemoto Mink was a passionate and persistent fighter against economic and social injustices in

Hawaii and across America;

Whereas Patsy Takemoto Mink was one of the first women

of color to win national office in 1964 and opened doors

of opportunity to millions of women and people of color

across America;

Whereas Patsy Takemoto Mink won unprecedented legislative

accomplishments on issues affecting women’s health, children, students, and working families; and

Whereas Patsy Takemoto Mink’s heroic, visionary, and tireless leadership to win the landmark passage of title IX

of the Education Amendments of 1972 opened doors to

women’s academic and athletic achievements and redefined what is possible for a generation of women and for

future generations our Nation’s daughters: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20

4 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.; Public Law 92–318) may be cited

5 as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Equal Opportunity in Edu6 cation Act’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 9,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 113

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contributions of Patsy Takemoto

Mink.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the

United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of theUnited States.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical

desecration of the flag of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein),
2

•HJ 36 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

2 The following article is proposed as an amendment

3 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be

4 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu5 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of

6 the several States within seven years after the date of its

7 submission for ratification:

8 ‘‘ARTICLE—

9 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys10 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               2,959
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          8,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    25,408
<PP&E>                                               5,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      43,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,629
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                98
<OTHER-SE>                                          (4,023)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        43,734
<SALES>                                             29,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    29,756
<CGS>                                               20,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       10,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,676)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            61
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.27)


</TABLE>
176 La. 306

#### AUGUSTIN v. AUGUSTIN.

No. 31208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 3, 1933.

*548Paul L. Fourchy, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Delvaille H. Theard, of New Orleans, for appellee.

ST. PAUL, J.

This is a suit to. annul and set aside on the ground of fraud, a sale of real estate by plaintiff to defendant. The sale attacked was by public act before a notary and two witnesses, and was duly signed by both parties.

The parties are a mother and her son, her only child. The mother complains, and testifies, that she was induced by her son, upoh some pretext or other, to go to the notary’s office;, that she did so, in company with a woman friend; that when she came there she was handed a paper already prepared, the contents of which she did not know and was not informed of; that she and her friend were told to sign the paper, and did so; that thereafter she discovered that she had signed an act purporting to be a sale of her property to her son, which her friend had signed as a witness. Her friend testifies to the same effect.

The notary is dead; but the other witness to the act, who knew plaintiff well and had never seen her son before the day of the sale, testifies that plaintiff came to the notary’s office accompanied only by her friend, and told the notary what she wished to do; that the notary then drew up the act; that the son, who was then at work elsewhere, was sent for; that the notary then read the act to the parties and witnesses, who then signed it. The defendant and his wife testify to the same effect.

The recited consideration for the sale was $1,000 cash, *plus*the assumption of a homestead mortgage for a like amount, *plus*the right reserved to vendor to occupy the premises rent free during her natural life, *plus*the undertaking by defendant to provide for his mother during the rest of her natural life.

The evidence shows that, immediately after the act was signed, plaintiff notified the tenants who occupied the other half of the house (a double one, and she herself lived on one side) that she had turned over the house to her son and that they should thereafter pay their rent to him; that they did so up to the filing of this suit three years afterwards, and ever since; that from the time of the sale plaintiff ceased paying the homestead installments and the taxes and othér charges, leaving them all for her son to take care of.

Which facts, undisputed, fully corroborate the defendant’s witnesses and prove conclusively that plaintiff knew quite well the nature and contents of the deed she signed. And since she attacks the act only on the ground that she knew nothing of its contents, we see no reason to pursue the matter further. The trial judge correctly dismissed her suit.

Decree.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omar Mollinedo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), all rendered February 16, 1989, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 3447/88, attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 3494/88, burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 3495/88, and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 3496/88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues *425which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIA.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute on Aging, including consideration of personnel qualifications 
and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIA.
    Date: October 28-29, 2008.
    Time: October 28, 2008, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Biomedical Research Center, 
251 Bayview Blvd., 3rd Floor Conference Room, Baltimore, MD 21224.
    Time: October 29, 2008, 8 a.m. to 6:35 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Biomedical Research Center, 
251 Bayview Blvd., 3rd Floor Conference Room, Baltimore, MD 21224.
    Contact Person: Dan L. Longo, MD, Scientific Director, National 
Institute of Aging, Gerontology Research Center, National Institutes 
of Health, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, 410-
558-8110, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62060e535613220c0b034c0c0b0a4c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43272f727732032d2a226d2d2a2b6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20638 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### BELL v FIRST NAT. LIFE INS. CO.

No. 13979.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 2, 1932.

See, also, 19 La. App. 151, 138 So. 904; 140 So. 11; 141 So. 379.

Normann, McMahon & Breckwoldt, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Henry J. Wyman and A. H. Reed, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERHIELD, J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Annie Hallow Bell, was injured under circumstances which it is now admitted involved the responsibility of defendant. Mrs. Bell suffered “a fracture of the neck of the femur, a fracture of the upper end of the thigh bone, high up, the inside of the joint, a very serious injury.” She was confined to the hospital for 8 weeks, and. her physician testified that considering her age, she was 68, he would expect her to be crippled for life because that was his experience in 90 per cent, of similar cases.

The trial court allowed $5,000 predicating its action on the case of Gallman v. Young, 6 La. App. 137, decided March 14, 1927.

 It seems to be generally conceded that Mrs. Bell’s injuries are similar to those under consideration in the Gallman Case, but counsel for defendant directs our attention to the fact that since that case was decided the purchasing power of the dollar has enhanced considerably, according to his calculations, 46 per cent. He has presented several trade journals containing articles, which, it is claimed, sustain his contention, and it is insisted that it is our right and duty to consider these articles, and to accept their estimates of the present value of the dollar. Cross v. Lee Lumber Co., 130 La. 66, 57 So. 631; Schneller v. Louisiana State Rice Milling Co., 148 La. 88, 86 So. 663; R. C. L. volume 15, Judicial Notice, verbo; “Statistics and Money,” § 56; Stevens v. Kansas City Light & Power Co., 200 Mo. App. 651, 208 S. W. 630.

We are convinced that we should take judicial cognizance of the fact that there has been an advance in the purchasing power of money, but cannot accept the figures which may have been arrived at hy writers in trade journals, particularly when the reputation and standing of these writers have not been proven nor the journals offered in evidence.

Assuming the similarity of Mrs. Bell’s injuries to those suffered by the plaintiff in the Gallman Case and giving some consideration to the notorious fact that the dpllar has enhanced in value, we have concluded that an award of $4,000 in this case will be sufficient.

Hor the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is amended so as to reduce the *485amount awarded plaintiff from $5,000 to $4,000, and, as thus amended, it is affirmed, plaintiff to pay the costs of this appeal, all others costs to be borne by defendant.

Amended and affirmed.