alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 125

Posthumously proclaiming soldiers of Asian descent who fought in the Civil 

War to be honorary citizens of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2002

Mr. HONDA (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

TOWNS, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. FROST, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. 

ABERCROMBIE, Mr. BACA, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. NORTON, Ms. 

WOOLSEY, Mr. WU, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of 

California, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. FILNER, 

Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. LEE, Mr. RADANOVICH, and Mr. PITTS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION

Posthumously proclaiming soldiers of Asian descent who 

fought in the Civil War to be honorary citizens of the 

United States.

Whereas the United States on rare occasions confers honorary citizenship on individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to this country or to humankind 

throughout the world; 

Whereas honorary citizenship is and should remain an extraordinary honor not lightly conferred nor frequently 

granted; 
2

•HJ 125 IH 

Whereas posthumous citizenship is an honorary status commemorating the bravery and sacrifices of these persons; 

it does not convey any benefits under the Immigration 

and Nationality Act to any relative of the decedent; 

Whereas current law provides for the granting of United 

States citizenship to aliens or noncitizen nationals of the 

United States who die because of injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by honorable, active duty service 

in the United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas it has been determined that numerous soldiers of 

Asian descent fought bravely and honorably in the Union 

and Confederate armed forces during the United States 

Civil War; 

Whereas many of these soldiers were denied citizenship following their service as a result of the Chinese Exclusion 

Act of 1882 and general anti-Asian sentiment prevalent 

at that time; and 

Whereas the Congress overturned the Chinese Exclusion Act 

of 1882 in 1943 to end this injustice to Asian immigrants but did not extend citizenship to those who had 

rightfully earned this honor but were denied the chance 

to seek it by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That soldiers of Asian descent who fought in the Civil War 

4 are posthumously proclaimed to be honorary citizens of 

5 the United States.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 5, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Allen F. Grum
Allen F. Grum, President (Chief
Executive Officer)            
|                   |  |  | 
|Dated: May 5, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy
Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer
(Chief Financial Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI, Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer

    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 14, 2003


                                     22
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11146

Conference Calendar

 

FLYNOIND FLOYD DEMERY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TAYLOR COUNTY ADULT DETENTION

FACILITY, Medical Staff; 

CAROLYN HAVINS; IRBY FOX, Doctor,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-171-BA

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Flynoind Floyd Demery, Texas prisoner #807670, appeals the

magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Demery argues that the

magistrate judge abused its discretion by dismissing his claim

and by denying his motion for appointment of counsel. Demery

does not argue the merits of his complaint nor does he address

the magistrate judge’s reasons for dismissing his claim and

denying his motion. Therefore, he has abandoned these issues on 
No. 97-11146

-2-

appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Brenda Lynn Cohen, for Admission to the Bar.

Movnt is permitted to renew her application for admission to the Bar. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 78

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2002, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Public Law 107–44 is further amended by striking
2

•HJ 78 EH

1 the date specified in section 107(c) and inserting in lieu

2 thereof ‘‘December 21, 2001’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 13,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 78

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes.
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: May 14, 2008

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                                   President


























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Company Pyramid Oil (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




     Date: May 14, 2008

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to request approval on a new and/or currently approved information collection. 

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before April 7, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send all comments regarding whether this information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the collection, to Rachel Newman-Karton, Program Analyst, Office of Small Business Development Centers, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 6th Floor, Wash., DC 20416. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rachel Newman-Karton, Program Analyst, Office of Small Business Development Centers, 202-619-1816                         *rachel.newman-karton@sba.gov*                         or Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030                         *curtis.rich@sba.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     “Quarterly Reports filed by Grantees of the Drug Free Workplace Program”.                 

*Description of Respondents:*                     Eligible Intermediaries who have received a Drug Free Workplace Program grant.                 

*Form No:*                     N/A.                 

*Annual Responses:*                     52.                 

*Annual Burden:*                     1,344.                 

Jacqueline White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

 [FR Doc. E8-2102 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1997
<CASH>                                              93
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10269
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      11298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 24063
<PP&E>                                           32715
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   40426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2030
<OTHER-SE>                                        5441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     40426
<SALES>                                          32990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 32990
<CGS>                                            25290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    31744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    514
<INCOME-TAX>                                       203
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                311
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       311
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Filed pursuant to
                                                                 Rule 424(b) (2)
                                                      Registration No. 333-68949


                                 $3,900,000,000
                                 CITIGROUP INC.
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series A
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series A
                 Due Nine Months or More From the Date of Issue

                 Pricing Supplement No. 00002, dated May 5, 2000
                  (To Prospectus Supplement, dated May 6, 1999,
                      to Prospectus, dated March 8, 1999).

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

         The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement
and modify, to the extent applicable, the description of general terms and
provisions of Citigroup Inc.'s Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series A set forth in
the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. Capitalized terms not
defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:                    Citigroup Inc. Medium-Term Senior Notes,
                                   Series A

CUSIP No.                          17306E AB 0

Aggregate Principal Amount:        $1,500,000,000.00

Issue Price:                       100%

Commission or Discount:            $300,000.00

Proceeds to Citigroup on initial
 issuance:                         $1,499,700,000.00

Issue Date:                        5/10/00

Stated Maturity Date:              6/6/01

Type of Interest on Note:          Floating Rate

Base Rate:                         LIBOR Telerate

Computation of Interest:           Actual over 360

Index Maturity:                    1 month

Interest Reset Date:               Interest payment date

Rate Determination Date:           2 London banking days prior to the Interest
                                   Reset Date

Spread (+/-)                       -3 bps

Initial Interest Rate:             Base Rate -3 bps

Interest Payment Dates:            Monthly, on the 10th of each month

First Interest Payment Date:       June 10, 2000

Record Dates:                      15 calendar days immediately preceding an
                                   Interest Payment Date

Optional Redemption:               No

Salomon Smith Barney Inc.'s
 capacity on original issuance:    Principal


Salomon Smith Barney Inc. has purchased the Notes as principal in this
transaction for resale to one or more investors or other purchasers at varying
prices related to prevailing market conditions at the time or times of resale as
determined by Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.,


c/o
      Global Commercial Real Estate


4
      World
      Financial Center, 16 th Floor


250
      Vesey
      Street, New York, New York 10080





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of May 1, 2006 among
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services,
      Inc., as Master Servicer No. 1, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Master
      Servicer No. 2, Midland Loan Services, Inc., as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank
      National Association, as Trustee and LaSalle Bank National Association, as
      Certificate Administrator and Custodian, relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage
      Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
      2006-C1.








I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Certificate Administrator and Custodian hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator and Custodian during
      the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Certificate
      Administrator and Custodian under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator
      and Custodian has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all
      material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and
      Custodian








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
#### Ferguson *v.*Collins et al.

(No. 24382

Decided November 29, 1933.)

*Mrs. Eva Eppstein Shaw*and *Mr. Wesley S. Thurs-tin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. I. O’Connor, Mr. Gerald P. Openlander*and *Mr. S. Z. Kaplm,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian D. Beckwith, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the People failed to establish reasonable cause for the stop of his automobile prior to his arrest on charges of driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle. We disagree. The police suspected that defendant’s driver’s license had been revoked and, as they followed defendant’s vehicle, that information was confirmed by radio transmission. Defendant’s vehicle was also observed weaving in its lane. The stop was thus properly based upon specific and articulable facts which reasonably warranted the intrusion *(see, People v Sobotker,*43 NY2d 559; *People v Ingle,*36 NY2d 413). Defendant’s claim that the People were required to present the testimony of the officer who transmitted the radio broadcast is unpreserved *(see, People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408, 416; *People v Weston,*56 NY2d 844; *People v Jenkins,*47 NY2d 722) and without merit *(see, People v Landy,*59 NY2d 369, 376-377; *People v Mack,*26 NY2d 311, 315-317, *cert denied*400 US 960; *People v Knight,*162 AD2d 970; *People v Buckley,*147 AD2d 898, *affd*75 NY2d 843). (Appeal from judgment of Ontario *864County Court, Henry, J.—felony driving while intoxicated.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.