alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Salomon Brothers Holding Company Inc
Address:   388 Greenwich Street
           New York, New York 10013

Form 13F File Number:              28-1114

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Howard M. Darmstadter
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7392

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Howard M. Darmstadter            New York, New York     November 12, 1999
-------------------------
Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the
period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter G. Schoonmaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ PETER G. SCHOONMAKER Peter G. Schoonmaker President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
April 15, 2009

---



QuickLinks
#### AUGRAIN et al. v. GARRITSON et al.

No. 16243.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 23, 1936.

Sol Weiss, of New Orleans, for appellants.

A. Miles Coe and John D. Lambert, both of New Orleans, for appellees.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

.The plaintiffs in this case, Mr. and Mrs. Rene H. Augrain, have prosecuted this devolutive appeal from a judgment setting aside the verdict of a jury wherein they were awarded $100 and $300, respectively, against the defendants, Louis Gar-ritson and the Owners’ Automobile Insurance Company of New Orleans. On the trial of the case in this court the defendants and appellees were unrepresented by counsel. No formal motion was filed to dismiss the appeal, but this court, observing the character of the judgment appealed from, is of opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.

Article 565 of the Code of Practice provides :

> “One may appeal from all final judgments rendered in causes in which an appeal is given by law, whether such judgments have been rendered after hearing the parties, or by default.”

Article 566 of the Code of Practice provides :

> “One may likewise appeal from all interlocutory judgments, when such judgment may cause him an irreparable injury.”

It is well settled that a judgment ■granting a new trial is interlocutory and not final and does not cause irreparable injury. Shreveport Grocery Co. v. Johnson et al., 10 La.App. 437, 121 So. 351, and authorities therein cited.

The case of Lemon et al. v. Marrero, Sheriff, 12 Orleans App. 74, relied upon by appellants, is not in point. It was there held that the delay fixed by Code Prac. art. 558, during which a party cast may ask for a new trial, begins to run from the day on which the judgment was rendered, and not on the day on which it was signed, and that the trial court was powerless to order a new trial upon an application filed after the delay had expired.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal in this case is ordered dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, JR., a/k/a Fat Sammy, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:93-

cr-00369-AMD-1) 

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne 

Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals 

the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 11



NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC.





|                                                                  |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------ | ----------------- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------ | 
|(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)                              |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|                                                                  |  | Third Quarter |        | First Nine Months |  
|                                                                  |  | 2008          |        | 2007              |   | 2008  |  | 2007 |       
|Net Earnings (1)                                                  |  | $             | 10,201 |                   | $ | 8,712 |  | $    | 26,033 |  | $ | 20,682 | 
|                                                                  |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|Weighted average common shares outstanding  (2)                   |  |               | 6,846  |                   |   | 6,837 |  |      | 6,844  |  |   | 6,835  | 
|                                                                  |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive  |  |               |       |                   |   |      |  |      |       |  |   |       | 
|                                                                  |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation  (3) |  |               | 6,846  |                   |   | 6,837 |  |      | 6,844  |  |   | 6,835  | 
|                                                                  |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|Net earnings per share:                                           |  |               |        |                   |   |       |  |      |        |  |   |        | 
|Basic  (1 divided by 2)                                           |  | $             | 1.49   |                   | $ | 1.27  |  | $    | 3.80   |  | $ | 3.03   | 
|Diluted  (1 divided by 3)                                         |  | $             | 1.49   |                   | $ | 1.27  |  | $    | 3.80   |  | $ | 3.03   |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00272

- CR

Raymond Paul SCHMIDT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6225

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial

court.

SIGNED March 4, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles L. Harris, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order which denied his CPL article 440 motion to vacate his 1981 conviction for first degree assault and third degree criminal possession of a weapon. Defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion without a hearing.

Defendant’s first contention in support of his motion was that prosecution witness Jerry May testified falsely under duress in denying that his testimony was given in exchange for a promise of favorable treatment. That argument is with*854out merit. There is no evidence to support that contention and it is contradicted by the trial record. Defendant also argues that the statement of Deborah Fuller shows that prosecution witnesses testified falsely in stating that Officer Russi, rather than Officer Ransford, shot defendant. He argues further that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to present Fuller’s testimony. Fuller’s statement does not indicate that Ransford shot defendant and thus is not inconsistent with the trial testimony. Moreover, even if Fuller’s statement contradicted the testimony, the contradiction would bear on an immaterial issue. Because the evidence indisputedly established that defendant shot Russi before defendant was shot, the question of who shot defendant is irrelevant. Similarly, because Fuller’s testimony would have been neither material nor exculpatory, trial counsel was not deficient in failing to present it.

Applying the statutory criteria in CPL 440.30 (4), we conclude that the court did not err in denying defendant’s motion without a hearing. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—CPL art 440.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
<Page>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                           of the United States Code

     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report
of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

                                /s/ E. James Ferland
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                E. James Ferland
                                Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                August 1, 2005
<Page>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.24


The compensation information reported on the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by
the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2005 is
incorporated herein by reference.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1785-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated August 24, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 26, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 24, 2008. 

Volusia County for Individual Assistance. 

Okeechobee and St. Lucie Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance). 

Hendry County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance. 

Baker, Bradford, Collier, Gadsden, Glades, Hardee, and Union Counties for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-20831 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                           THE LUPTON COMPANY, LLC
                              702 TALLAN BUILDING
                               TWO UNION SQUARE
                         CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37402
                                      

                                January 19, 1999




PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
Ms. Cindy L. Davis
The Arnold Palmer Golf Company
6201 Mountain View Road
Ooltowah, TN 37363


     Re:  Arnold Palmer Golf Company - Term Loans and
          Revolving Credit Loan of Northern Trust Company


Dear Cindy:

          The John T. Lupton Trust U/W Thomas Cartter Lupton ("Trust") acquired
the following loans of Northern Trust Company to the Arnold Palmer Golf Company
("APGC") on October 30, 1998.

          1.  The term loan to APGC (the "Borrower") evidenced by that certain
Term Note dated as of December 30, 1996 of the Borrower payable to the order of
the Bank in the original amount of $12,000,000.

          2.  The term loan to APGC evidenced by that certain Term Note dated
as of December 29, 1997 of the Borrower payable to the order of the Bank in the
original amount of $10,000,000.

          3.  The revolving credit loan to APGC evidenced by that certain
$12,000,000 face amount Master Note dated as of December 29, 1997.

          The purpose of this letter is to confirm to you that the Trust has
agreed to place the notes representing such loans on a non-accrual basis for
the period from the date of such acquisition through December 31, 1998. As a
result, there will be no obligation on the part of APGC 
<PAGE>   2
January 19, 1999
Page 2

    to pay interest on such Notes for such period.

          Yours very truly,


          JOHN T. LUPTON TRUST
          U/W THOMAS CARTER


          /s/ David S. Gonzenbach
          --------------------------------
          David S. Gonzenbach Trustee


          /s/ John T. Lupton
          --------------------------------
          John T. Lupton Trustee


          /s/ Joel W. Richardson, Jr.
          --------------------------------
          Joel W. Richardson, Jr., Trustee
#### Barry Esannason, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Valerie Bowers, et al., Respondents, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered September 27, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant New York City Housing Authority’s motion for counsel fees and sanctions pursuant to CPLR 8303-a and section 130-1.1 of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR 130-1.1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs counsel has advanced a reasonable theory upon which suit was commenced against the defendant Housing Authority, despite being presented with the deed evidencing the fact that the playground where the infant plaintiff was injured had been conveyed by the New York City Housing Authority to the City of New York in 1952. The city denied the claim and stated that it was the Housing Authority that should be served. Thus, there is no basis upon which to impose counsel fees and/or sanctions upon the plaintiffs or their attorneys pursuant to CPLR 8303-a or section 130-1.1 of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts. *(See,*CPLR 8303-a [c]; 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; *see also, Narins v DeBrovner,*141 AD2d 381; *compare, Hoeflich v Chemical Bank,*149 AD2d 341, in which sanctions were imposed.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Blake, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 4, 2010



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/    RONALD L.
BLAKE                               
|Ronald L. Blake President and Chief Executive Officer



33
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7109 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7109

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to require public lodging 
  establishments to waive minimum age requirements for members of the 
                             Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2022

 Mrs. Hartzler (for herself and Mr. Norcross) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in 
    addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to require public lodging 
  establishments to waive minimum age requirements for members of the 
                             Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hotels for Heroes Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MINIMUM AGE REQUIREMENTS IN PUBLIC LODGING 
              ESTABLISHMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Waiver.--Title VII of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 
U.S.C. 4021 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:

``SEC. 708. WAIVER OF MINIMUM AGE REQUIREMENTS IN PUBLIC LODGING 
              ESTABLISHMENTS.

    ``(a) Waiver.--A public lodging establishment shall waive any 
minimum age requirement to obtain accommodation at such establishment 
for a member of the Armed Forces who presents a valid identification 
card issued by the Armed Force of such member and seeks to obtain 
accommodation at such establishment while--
            ``(1) under military orders (as defined in section 305); or
            ``(2) on authorized military leave.
    ``(b) Penalty.--Whoever knowingly violates subsection (a) shall be 
fined under title 18, United States Code.
    ``(c) Public Lodging Establishment Defined.--In this section, the 
term `public lodging establishment' includes any inn, hotel, motel, or 
other establishment that provides lodging to transient guests, other 
than an establishment located within a building that contains not more 
than five rooms for rent or hire and that is actually occupied by the 
proprietor of such establishment as the residence of such 
proprietor.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for that Act is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 707 the 
following new item:

``Sec. 708. Waiver of minimum age requirements in public lodging 
                            establishments.''.
                                 <all>
```