alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COSTE v. H. G. HILL STORES, Inc., et al.

No. 16757.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 7, 1938.

'Joseph Merrick Jones, Wm. Behan Dreux, and A. J. Waechter, Jr., all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Stephen C. Hartel and Jonas C. Sporl, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Walter A. Coste, plaintiff, and against H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., in the sum of $337.50, as damages for physical injuries. Liability is admitted, the sole question being one of quantum.

The plaintiff, a customer of the defendant, received injuries to the index finger of his left hand caused by a fragment of glass when an electric light globe fell and struck the counter upon which his hand was resting. Plaintiff's expenses in connection with the accident are conceded to have been $45 paid to an assistant for three weeks’ work at the rate of $15 per week, the employment being necessitated by his injury, $41 for medical services, and $1.50 for drugs, or a total of $87.50. It is evident that the judge a quo allowed $250 for physical suffering. This amount is said to be excessive by defendant-appellant and inadequate by plaintiff-appellee.

A reference to the medical testimony in the record, which consists of that of Dr. *513Loria, plaintiff’s physician, and that of Dr. Irwin, an expert for defendant, shows little ultimate disagreement. Due to scar tissue “on the palmer surface of the left index finger” there is a limitation in the flexion “in both interphalangeal joints” of about 50 per cent. It is doubtful whether this limitation will be permanent, but it existed at the time of the trial about thirteen months after the accident. It also appears that there was considerable pain in connection with the healing of the relatively small wound. Under the circumstances, it does not appear to us that the amount awarded by the trial court is' grossly inadequate or manifestly excessive.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Sharon H., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Society for Seamen’s Children et al., Respondents; Sharon H., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Hassan H., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Society for Seamen’s Children et al., Respondents; Sharon H., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

In proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground that the parents abandoned their children, or in the alternative, on the ground that they have permanently neglected their children, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders (one order as to each child) of the Family Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), both entered May 25, 1988, as, after a hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the petitioner Society for Seamen’s Children.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contentions, the record amply supports the Family Court’s findings that the petitioner fulfilled its statutory obligation *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b [7]) of employing diligent efforts to strengthen the parent-child relationship *(see, e.g., Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136). Moreover, the agency sustained its burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that the mother permanently neglected her children by making no efforts to contact them or to establish a realistic plan for their future *(see, Matter of Gregory B.,*74 NY2d 77). We note that a parent’s incarceration does not excuse the planning requirement, and under the facts and circumstances of this case, the mother did not offer a viable plan *(see, Matter of Gregory B., supra,*at 87-88). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Estate of Barnett Kadin, Deceased, Appellant, v Roger Bennett et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), entered June 1, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the determination of the respondent Board of *310Standards and Appeals of the City of New York denying the petitioner’s application pursuant to New York City Zoning Resolution § 11-331 for a six-month renewal of a building permit, was rationally based and cannot be said to be arbitrary or capricious *(see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 231). Significantly, the petitioner failed to prove that there was substantial progress on the foundation as measured by the physical construction which was done prior to the lapse of the building permit. The petitioner’s proof that some moneys had been expended and irrevocably committed, while relevant to a determination of "substantial progress” within the meaning of the zoning resolution, cannot substitute for a showing that there has been some significant degree of progress measured in terms of physical construction *(see generally, Matter of Putnam Armonk v Town of Southeast,*52 AD2d 10, 14-15). Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Associated Madison Companies, Inc.
Address:   153 East 53rd Street
           New York, New York 10043

Form 13F File Number:              28-1876

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Firoz Tarapore
Title:     Deputy Treasurer
Phone:     (212) 793-8090

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Firoz Tarapore        New York, New York         November 12, 1999
------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-41094

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 4, 2003.

Before GARWOOD, DEMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Following a bench trial, Steven Trevino was convicted of being a felon in posses*331sion of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues on appeal that the evidence admitted at his trial was insufficient to support a finding that the interstate commerce nexus, *as described in his indictment,*was met. His indictment reads, in pertinent part, that Trevino “possess[ed] firearms which had previously been shipped and transported in interstate commerce.” He argues that this language requires a showing that he contemporaneously possessed firearms in interstate or foreign commerce. We disagree.

Section 922 “prohibits certain people ‘from receiving, possessing or transporting firearms in interstate or foreign commerce or firearms which have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.’ ” *United States v. Shelton,*987 F.2d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1991) (quoting *United States v. Perez,*No. 90-8177, 917 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. Sept.27, 1990)). In enacting section 922(g), we have held that Congress intended to describe broadly the nexus between commerce and the prohibited possession of a firearm by a felon. *Id.*at 148; *United States v. Fitzhugh,*984 F.2d 143, 146 (5th Cir.1993) (“[A] convicted felon’s possession of a firearm having a past connection to interstate commerce violates § 922(g)(1).”). Accordingly, we have previously rejected efforts to so parse the language of section 922(g) as to differentiate among the activities that it prohibits in terms of “different levels of involvement in interstate commerce.” *Shelton,*937 F.2d at 145. And we similarly reject Trevino’s attempt to distinguish between possessing a firearm “in commerce,” and possessing a firearm “affecting commerce.” Evidence that a firearm has traveled interstate at some point in the past is thus sufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), even if the defendant possessed the firearm entirely intrastate. *United States v. Cavazos,*288 F.3d 706, 712 (5th Cir.2002), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 910, 123 S.Ct. 253, 154 L.Ed.2d 189 (2002). We therefore conclude, after reviewing the record, that the evidence adduced at Trevino’s trial was sufficient to support his conviction under the terms of his indictment. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this opinion should not be *331published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 21.0

Subsidiaries





|                                  |  |                     |   |  |                                      
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | -------------------------------------
|Registrant                        |  | PercentageOwnership |   |  | Jurisdiction orState of Incorporation
|                                  |  |                    
|Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.           |  |                     |   |  |                                      
|                                  |  |                    
|Subsidiaries                      |  |                     |   |  |                                      
|                                  |  |                    
|Fox Chase Bank                    |  | 100                 | % |  | United States                        
|                                  |  |                    
|Fox Chase Financial, Inc. (1)     |  | 100                 | % |  | Delaware                             
|                                  |  |                    
|Fox Chase Service Corporation (1) |  | 100                 | % |  | Pennsylvania                         



|(1) | Wholly owned subsidiary of Fox Chase Bank.
|--- | ------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997             MAR-20-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1996             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1997             MAR-20-1998
<CASH>                                          24,243                   8,894
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  17,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,668                 149,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,948                   3,056
<INVENTORY>                                      4,190                   4,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,393                 192,368
<PP&E>                                          46,430                  48,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,685                  30,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,196                 328,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,794                 106,054
<BONDS>                                         25,019                  24,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        75,341                  75,689
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,288                  69,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,196                 328,872
<SALES>                                      1,001,889                 231,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,001,889                 231,295
<CGS>                                          877,016                 204,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  877,016                 204,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,551                  23,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   885                     380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,897                     605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,540                   2,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,807                   1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,733                   1,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,733                   1,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17                     .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12                     .11
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS




I, Andrew
Leszczynski, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SACO I
Trust 2006-6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2. Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on
my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and




5. All of
the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
10-K.




In giving
the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC Mortgage Corporation, as servicer;
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as vendor; American Security Insurance
Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Safeco Financial Institution
Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.), each as vendor; GMAC Mortgage,
LLC, as servicer; GMAC Bank, as vendor; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
custodian.




Date:
July 22, 2008




LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Master Servicer




/s/ Andrew
Leszczynski


Andrew
Leszczynski


First
Vice President
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

                  MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS


          All of Registrant's railroad properties are on long-term lease
 to Norfolk and Western Railway Company for the fixed, unvarying amount
 of $915,000 cash rental per year. The lease also requires that
 additional, large amounts be recorded as non-cash rent income.


          With fixed revenue and expenses relatively constant, there is
 very little fluctuation in operating results between periods. In
 comparing the first quarter of 1997 with the preceding fourth quarter
 1996 and the first quarter of 1996, revenues totaled $229,000, $228,000
 and $229,000, respectively. Net income and income available for
 distribution was $212,000, $206,000 and $204,000, respectively.


 PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
          
           None



                              SIGNATURES
 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
 behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD



                                                                 
        05/13/97              Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Chairman of the Board


                                                                 
        05/13/97              Robert A. Hamstead
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Secretary and Treasurer


May 13, 1997
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
February 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned Maurice J. Hamilburg, President and Co-Chief Operating
Officer, Joseph D. Hamilburg, Chairman and Co-Chief Operating
Officer and Joseph J. Berns, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the Signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/  Maurice J. Hamilburg
President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: 10/12/04



/s/  Joseph J. Hamilburg
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: 10/12/04



/s/  Joseph J. Berns
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date: 10/12/04
EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of the
Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Herbert E.
Jones, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Trustees,
Herbert E. Jones, III, President of the Trust,
and Robert R. McCoy, Vice President, Secretary
and Treasurer, certify, to the best of our
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Trust.


/s/ Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Trustee

Date:  May 14, 2009



/s/ Herbert E. Jones, III
Herbert E. Jones, III
President


Date:  May 14, 2009


/s/ Robert R. McCoy
Robert R. McCoy
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

Date:  May 14, 2009
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

                  MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS


          All of Registrant's railroad properties are on long-term lease
 to Norfolk and Western Railway Company for the fixed, unvarying amount
 of $915,000 cash rental per year. The lease also requires that
 additional, large amounts be recorded as non-cash rent income.


          With fixed revenue and expenses relatively constant, there is
 very little fluctuation in operating results between periods. In
 comparing the first quarter of 1999 with the preceding fourth quarter
 1998 and the first quarter of 1998, revenues totaled $229,000, $228,000
 and $229,000, respectively. Net income and income available for
 distribution was $212,000, $211,000 and $209,000, respectively.


 PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
          
           None



                              SIGNATURES
 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
 behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD



                                                                 
        05/10/99              Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Chairman of the Board


                                                                 
        05/10/99              Robert A. Hamstead
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Secretary and Treasurer


May 10, 1999