alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7096 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to enhance the authority of U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to share information with respect to merchandise 

suspected of violating intellectual property rights with rights holders 

and other interested parties. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2022 

Mr. BUCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to enhance the authority 

of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to share information with respect to merchandise suspected of violating 

intellectual property rights with rights holders and other 

interested parties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7096 IH

1 SECTION 1. ENHANCED AUTHORITY TO SHARE INFORMA2 TION WITH RESPECT TO MERCHANDISE SUS3 PECTED OF VIOLATING INTELLECTUAL 

4 PROPERTY RIGHTS. 

5 Section 628A of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

6 1628a) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (1) 

8 and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(1) shall provide to the person information 

10 that appears on the merchandise, including— 

11 ‘‘(A) its packaging, materials, and con12 tainers, including labels; and 

13 ‘‘(B) its packing materials and containers, 

14 including labels; and’’; and 

15 (2) in subsection (b)— 

16 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

17 and inserting a semicolon; 

18 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the pe19 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

20 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(5) any other party with an interest in the 

22 merchandise, as determined appropriate by the Com23 missioner.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [TD 9417] 
          - RIN 1545-BE39 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to final and temporary regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects final and temporary regulations (TD 9417) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 (73 FR 42522) relating to the averaging of farm and fishing income in computing income tax liability.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Amy Pfalzgraf, (202) 622-4960 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final and temporary regulations (TD 9417) that are the subject of this correction are under section 1301 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, TD 9417 contains an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the final and temporary regulations (TD 9417), which were the subject of FR Doc. E8-16665, is corrected as follows: 

On page 42522, column 2, in the preamble, under the caption “For Further Information Contact”, line 2, the language “Amy Pfalzgraf, (202) 622-4950 (not a“ is corrected to read “Amy Pfalzgraf (202) 622-4960 (not a “. 

LaNita Van Dyke, 

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,  Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel,  (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. E8-20555 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.13.3  


Amendment No. 10 (the "Amendment") To

Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") between

Andrew Hobson ("Employee") and Univision Management Co. ("Company")  


Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 


        1.    Term.    The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31,
2007, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement. 


        2.    Salary.    The annual Base Salary rate will be Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($750,000) for the annual period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. 


        3.    Effective Date of Amendment.    Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment
will become effective as of December 31, 2004. 


        4.    Other.    Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed. 



	 	 	UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  JEFFREY T. HINSON      
 Jeffrey T. Hinson

Chief Financial Officer
	/s/  ANDREW HOBSON      
 Andrew Hobson
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens  Communications Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Tow,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Leonard Tow
-----------------------
Leonard Tow
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Citizens  Communications  Company
and will be retained by Citizens  Communications  Company and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc J. Eisenberg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of ORBCOMM Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2013



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Marc J. Eisenberg                
|Marc J. Eisenberg,                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
203 La. 556

#### STATE v. MANOUVRIER.

No. 36745.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 17, 1943.

Rehearing Denied June 21,1943.

See, also, 14 So.2d 439.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., Seth Lewis,. Dist. Atty., of Opelousas, and R. H. Lee,. Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellant.

Lessley P. Gardiner, of Opelousas, for defendant and appellee.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

This is a prosecution for embezzlement of public money, in violation of sections-903 and 904 of the Revised Statutes, articles 912 and 913 of Dart’s Criminal Statutes. The State is appealing from a judgment maintaining a motion to quas'h the indictment and dismissing the prosecution.

The allegations of the indictment are substantially the same as in the other case against this defendant, No. 36,746, of the docket of this court, decided today. 14 So. 2d 439. In this case the date of the alleged embezzlement was April 18, 1938; the amount alleged to have been embezzled is $185; the amount of the check drawn by the defendant and the president of the Police Jury was said to be for $900;. and the purpose for which the check was-drawn was said to be to pay the expenses-of the members and the secretary of the Police Jury in attending a convention in Shreveport on April 18, 19, and 20, according to the bill of particulars. Another difference between this case and the-case No. 36,746 is that in this case the check for $900 was made payable to the order of “A. J. Manouvrier, Secy.” And in the case No. 36,746 the check for $960 was-made payable to A. J. Manouvrier. The fact that the check was made payable to-“A. J. Manouvrier, Secy.,” and that the purpose of the appropriation of the $900* was to pay the expenses of the secretary, as. well as the members, of the Police Jury was not made a ground for the motion to-quash the indictment; and we consider that difference between this case and the 'other case as a matter of no importance, because the defendant is not charged with embezzlement of the check, but is charged with embezzlement of $185 of the proceeds, amounting to $900, which he received when he cashed the check.

For the reasons given in the case entitled State of Louisiana v. Antoine J. Manou*445vrier, supra, the judgment appealed from in this case is reversed, the motion to quash the indictment is overruled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

HIGGINS, J., concurs in the decree.

FOURNET and PONDER, JJ., dissent.

FOURNET, Justice

(dissenting).

The issues involved in this case are, for all intents and purposes, identical with those in the case of State of Louisiana v. Antoine J. Manouvrier, La. Sup., 14 So.2d 439, this day handed down, and I therefore respectfully dissent from the decision in this case for my reasons there assigned.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James J. Shutter, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see,*CPL 290.10 [1]; *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621; *People v Vasquez,*142 AD2d 698, 700, *lv denied*72 NY2d 1050), we find that it was legally sufficient to sustain defendant’s convictions for attempted burglary in the second degree *(see, People v Middleton,*140 AD2d 550, *lv denied*72 NY2d 959; *People v Terry,*43 AD2d 875; *see also, People v Castillo,*47 NY2d 270, 277-278; *People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296, 300-302, *rearg denied*41 NY2d 1010). Defendant’s contention that the court’s charge on intent improperly shifted the burden of proof to him *(see, Sandstrom v Montana,*442 US 510) is not preserved for our review and lacks merit in any event because the court’s language merely described a permissive inference *(see, People v Getch,*50 NY2d 456, 463-464). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—attempted burglary, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Second Department,

July, 1990

(July 2, 1990)

#### Marjorie Bienz, Individually and as Executrix of Ha*270rold T. Bienz, Deceased, Respondent, v Central Suffolk Hospital et al., Defendants, and Victor N. Ambruoso, Appellant.

In a medical malpractice action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Victor Ambruoso appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), dated March 16, 1989, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him with respect to allegations of malpractice occurring before October 9, 1982, at 12:00 a.m.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The question presented on appeal, as it is phrased by the appellant in his brief, is "[w]hether a telephone call to a physician’s office for the purpose of initiating treatment is sufficiently *[sic]*to create a physician-client relationship”. The appellant’s argument is based on his assertion that, as a matter of law, such a communication is insufficient to create the sort of physician-patient relationship which is necessary in order to support a medical malpractice cause of action. We agree with the Supreme Court that this assertion is incorrect.

As noted by the Supreme Court in its decision, it was not entirely clear "what was actually said to decedent and his wife, [and] what reliance they could have reasonably placed in [appellant] as the result of their conversations with him”. A medical malpractice cause of action may be based on allegations that a physician negligently gave advice to his patient as to what course of treatment to pursue. Whether the physician’s giving of advice furnishes a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that an implied physician-patient relationship had arisen is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury *(see, Hickey v Travelers Ins. Co.,*158 AD2d 112; *Tolisano v Texon,*144 AD2d 267, 278, *revd on other grounds*75 NY2d 731; *Twitchell v MacKay,*78 AD2d 125; *O’Neill v Montefiore Hosp.,*11 AD2d 132).

Since the appellant failed to prove, as a matter of law, that no physician-patient relationship had arisen at the time of the alleged malpractice, this and the remaining issues of fact present in the case should be resolved by a jury. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999                   SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998                   OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         6,032                         2,120
<SECURITIES>                                   0                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,046                         2,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                             0
<INVENTORY>                                    40,653                        41,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               59,693                        51,438
<PP&E>                                         13,513                        11,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,581)                       (4,595)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 76,226                        70,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,880                        11,571
<BONDS>                                        0                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                             0  
<PREFERRED>                                    0                             0
<COMMON>                                       258                           258
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,989                        23,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   76,226                        70,821
<SALES>                                        22,756                        23,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,926                         7,677
<CGS>                                          0                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,705                         10,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (741)                         (734)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,353)                       (3,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                             (1,290)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                             0
<CHANGES>                                      0                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,353)                       (2,105)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.11)                        (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.11)                        (0.21)

        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



    Polymer Research Corp. of America Certification under Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes/Oxley Act- Filed as an exhibit to 10QSB for the Quarter Ended
                                 June 30, 2002



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Polymer  Research  Corp. of America
(the"Company")  On Form 10QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  ("Report"),  I Carl
Horowitz,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.



August 14, 2002                                  by: /s/ Carl Horowitz
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Chief Executive and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer
#### Richard L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5008.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2001.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Suzanne M. Bausch, Appellant, v Robert J. Slone et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*for the imposition of a constructive trust, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), dated April 20, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The requisites for a valid inter vivos gift are: intent on the part of a donor to make a gift of property, a delivery of the property pursuant to such intent, and acceptance on the part of the donee *(see, Gruen v Gruen,*68 NY2d 48). We agree with the Supreme Court that there is no evidence of delivery, actual or constructive, of the alleged gift to the plaintiff. We have examined the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thus, summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted. Mangano, P. J., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: May 14, 2004                              /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth
Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Mental 
Health Services in MH Specialty Settings, October 7, 2008, 8:30 am to 
October 7, 2008, 5 p.m., Hilton Crystal City, 2399 Jefferson Davis Hwy, 
Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the Federal Register on 
August 15, 2008, 73 FR 47958.
    The meeting location has been changed to the Fairmont Hotel, 2401 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037. The meeting date and times remain 
the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 2, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20902 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P