U.S. Department of Justice OMB No. 1121-0329 

Office of Justice Programs 

National Institute of Justice 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) is pleased to announce that it is seeking applications for funding to operate the 

Criminal Justice Electronic Crime Technology Center of Excellence within the National Law 

Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center System (the "NLECTC System"). This 

program furthers the Department’s mission by sponsoring research to provide objective, 

independent, evidence-based knowledge and tools to meet the challenges of crime and justice, 

particularly at the State and local levels. 

Solicitation: 

Criminal Justice Electronic Crime 

Technology Center of Excellence 

Eligibility 

In general, NIJ is authorized to make grants to, or enter into contracts or cooperative 

agreements with, States (including territories), local governments (including federallyrecognized Indian tribal governments as determined by the Secretary of the Interior and 

published in the Federal Register), nonprofit and profit organizations (including tribal nonprofit 

and profit organizations), institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions of higher 

education), and certain qualified individuals. Foreign governments, foreign organizations, and 

foreign institutions of higher education are not eligible to apply. 

Deadline 

Registration with HUOJP’s Grant Management System (GMS)UH is required prior to application 

submission. (See “How to Apply,” page 9.) 

All applications are due by 11:45 p.m. eastern time on April 19, 2010. 

(See “Deadlines: Registration and Application,” page 3.) 

Contact Information 

For technical assistance with submitting the application, contact the Grants Management 

System Support Hotline at 1–888–549–9901, option 3 or via e-mail to 

HUGMS.HelpDesk@usdoj.govUH. 

Note: The HUGMSUH Support Hotline hours of operation are Monday-Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 

midnight eastern time, except for Federal holidays. 

For assistance with any other requirement of this solicitation, contact Michael Bottner, 

Solicitation Coordinator, at 202–514–0686 or by e-mail to michael.bottner@usdoj.gov. 

SL# 000902 
CONTENTS 

Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3
 

Deadlines: Registration and Application ........................................................................... 3 

Eligibility ............................................................................................................................ 3 

Specific Information .......................................................................................................... 3 

Performance Measures ..................................................................................................... 8 

How to Apply..................................................................................................................... 9 

What an Application Must Include................................................................................... 11 

Standard Form 424 ............................................................................................. 11 

Program Narrative ............................................................................................... 11 

Budget and Budget Narrative.............................................................................. 12 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) ...................................................... 13 

Plan for Collecting the Data Required for Performance Measures ..................... 13 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable)........................................................ 13 

Other Standard Forms ........................................................................................ 14 

Selection Criteria............................................................................................................. 14 

Review Process .............................................................................................................. 16 

Additional Requirements................................................................................................. 16 

Application Checklist....................................................................................................... 19 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013
 2 
Criminal Justice Electronic Crime Technology 

Center of Excellence 

CFDA No. 16.560 

Overview 

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is the research, development, and evaluation agency of 

the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and a component of the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). 

NIJ provides objective, independent, evidence-based knowledge and tools to enhance the 

administration of justice and public safety. 

NIJ seeks qualified applicants to operate the Criminal Justice Electronic Crime Technology 

Center of Excellence (“the Center”) within the NLECTC System. The Center provides scientific 

and technical support to NIJ’s research and development efforts; supports the demonstration, 

transfer, and adoption of appropriate technology into practice by law enforcement and 

corrections agencies, courts, and public crime laboratories; assists in the development and 

dissemination of technology guidelines and standards; and provides technology assistance, 

information, and support to law enforcement and other criminal justice agencies. 

The Center was first established within the NLECTC System in 2009 through a competitive 

award to Electronic Crime Partnership Initiative, LLC. 

Authorizing Legislation: Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (sections 201 

and 202); Homeland Security Act of 2002 (section 232). 

Deadlines: Registration and Application 

Registration is required prior to submission. The deadline to register in GMS is 11:45 p.m. 

eastern time on April 19, 2010 and the deadline for applying for funding under this 

announcement is 11:45 p.m. eastern time on April 19, 2010. Please see the “How to Apply” 

section, page 9, for more details. 

Eligibility 

Please refer to the title page for eligibility information under this program. 

Specific Information—Criminal Justice Electronic Crime 

Technology Center of Excellence 

NIJ, through its Office of Science and Technology (OST), is the national focal point for work on 

criminal justice technology, including technology for law enforcement, corrections, investigative, 

and forensic applications, as well as judicial process-related applications. OST administers 

programs to improve the safety and effectiveness of criminal justice technologies. NIJ’s Science 

and Technology (S&T) program currently consists of 19 technology investment portfolios, 

including an electronic crime technology portfolio, which includes both electronic crime and 

digital evidence related technologies. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 3 
The NLECTC System is an integral part of NIJ's S&T program. It provides scientific and 

technical support to NIJ’s research and development efforts; supports the demonstration, 

transfer, and adoption of technology into practice by law enforcement and corrections agencies, 

courts, and crime laboratories; assists in the development and dissemination of technology 

guidelines and standards; and provides technology assistance, information, and support to law 

enforcement and corrections agencies, courts, and crime laboratories. 

Centers of Excellence work with the NLECTC National and Regional Technology Centers and 

the Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) at the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology as part of an integrated NLECTC System. The National Center serves as the 

clearinghouse for technology information and executes NIJ's compliance testing program. The 

Regional Centers serve as the initial point of entry for law enforcement practitioners to the 

NLECTC System and provide generalized technology assistance to law enforcement and 

corrections agencies, public crime laboratories, and judicial agencies in their regions. They also 

forward requests for specialized assistance to the appropriate Center of Excellence, and, as 

necessary, coordinate technology demonstrations and evaluations sponsored by a Center of 

Excellence with agencies within their regions. 

The Centers of Excellence are the authoritative resource within the NLECTC System for both 

practitioners and developers in their technology area(s) of focus. The primary role of the 

Centers of Excellence is to assist in the transition of law enforcement technology from the 

laboratory into practice by first adopters. To that end, successful applicants must be highly 

knowledgeable of both practitioner requirements and their operational context and potential 

technology solutions. 

Specific tasks that the Center will be expected to perform include: 

Identifying technology and operational requirements. The Center will accomplish this 

principally by hosting and supporting relevant Technology Working Group (TWG) activities. The 

Center will also be expected to conduct relevant, focused studies as described below to support 

program development, and participate in relevant technical conferences and symposia. 

The Center will host and support an electronic crime TWG. TWGs consist of roughly 20 

knowledgeable practitioners in the operational employment of the technology addressed in a 

particular portfolio. They assist NIJ in identifying technology gaps in a portfolio area in terms of 

operational requirements and desired outcomes. They also assist NIJ in reviewing ongoing 

technology projects and potential new projects. TWGs facilitate outreach and assist in 

facilitating technology demonstrations and evaluations. The Center is expected to have the 

knowledge to identify the key agencies and practitioners that should participate in the TWG. 

TWGs normally meet twice a year. A three-day meeting, exclusive of travel time, is 

representative. Venues will vary, but sites in the Washington, DC area are preferred. 

In supporting the TWG, the Center will, in close coordination with the relevant NIJ program 

manager: 

•	 Identify the key agencies, professional organizations, and individual practitioners that 

should participate in the TWG; 

•	 Schedule TWG meetings; 

•	 Develop meeting agendas; 

•	 Secure a venue and required logistic services, including audiovisual support; 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 4 
 

•	 Pay the travel and per diem expenses, but not the salaries, of the non-Federal 

participants;
 

•	 Moderate the meetings; and 

•	 Record and publish the proceedings. 

Supporting NIJ’s research and development programs. The Center’s scientists and 

engineers are expected to assist the NIJ program manager to define program objectives; 

assess ongoing research and development projects; recommend relevant technology efforts for 

NIJ collaboration; and participate in national and regional groups that develop and support the 

adoption of technology. The Center will assist the NIJ program manager in identifying expert 

practitioners and knowledgeable technologists to participate in peer review of work products and 

research grant applications. The Center, working with other relevant centers of excellence and 

regional centers, will also assist the NIJ program manager in implementing operational 

evaluations of NIJ-sponsored and other relevant technologies with criminal justice agencies. 

Two specific activities that the Center will be expected to carry out in supporting NIJ’s research 

and development programs are: 

•	 Conducting and publishing a study based on empirical data to comprehensively identify 

the impact of electronic crime and digital evidence on State and local law enforcement 

and to help identify and prioritize the electronic crime and digital evidence needs of State 

and local law enforcement agencies. 

o	 The last NIJ Research Report on the Electronic Crime Needs Assessment for 

State and Local Law Enforcement was published in March, 1999. Since that 

research report, technology has evolved at an ever increasing rate. An updated 

needs assessment is critical to clearly assess the impact of electronic crime and 

digital evidence on State and local law enforcement and provide NIJ with 

information to help guide future research and development project funding 

decisions. 

•	 Conducting and publishing a study based on empirical data on the total number of cell 

phones in use which may become evidence in an investigation and developing a 

corresponding acquisition and analysis solution set for each cell phone. 

o	 In order to effectively focus research and development in this area, a clear 

understanding of the number of cell phones in use, the number and type of 

service provider communication technologies in use and the capabilities of 

existing cell phone acquisition and analysis tools and technologies in use is 

necessary to ensure that future research and development efforts target the gaps 

in the existing cell phone acquisition, analysis and reporting technologies. 

Testing, evaluating, and demonstrating technologies. The Center will be expected to be 

able to conduct comparative testing in controlled laboratory or field environments, and 

operational evaluation and demonstration of technology with practitioner agencies. Technology 

demonstrations may range from 2 hours to 24 months or longer. Findings will be disseminated 

through reports, conferences, standards, and technology assistance activities. The Center is 

expected to focus its efforts primarily on the evaluation of new technologies in field 

environments. Evaluations must be designed to determine whether a technology meets all of 

the required assessment criteria. To the greatest extent feasible, demonstrations will be 

designed to determine criminal justice outcomes through evaluation research in collaboration 

with the NIJ program manager and with NIJ’s Office of Research and Evaluation. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 5 
 

Technology areas of interest include: 

• Very large scale data warehouse solutions for digital evidence. 

• Counter forensic tools. 

• Random access memory acquisition and analysis tools. 

• GPS, mobile phone, and personal digital assistant forensic tools. 

NIJ also anticipates that it will begin evaluation of technologies resulting from its investments in 

mobile phone and home gaming console digital evidence collection tools. 

Supporting the adoption of new technology. The Center’s efforts will focus on facilitating the 

effective transfer into practice of new tools and technologies, including those funded by NIJ and 

others. Efforts may include introducing new tools and technologies to the practitioner, 

introducing practitioner requirements to developers, and assisting developers in the 

commercialization of their products. Commercialization activities may include providing 

practitioner feedback to technology developers in the criminal justice marketplace; describing 

criminal justice requirements and practices, based upon practitioner input; providing 

opportunities for demonstration of technologies; and presenting strategies for the 

commercialization of developers’ technologies. The Center will play a vital role in providing 

practitioner agencies access to new technologies and improved capabilities. NIJ will not provide 

direct financial assistance to companies to commercialize products. NIJ may, however, support 

operational evaluation or pilot programs for first adopters of new technology, particularly those 

that evaluate a technology or develop best practices for the use of a technology. NIJ also 

encourages support for existing electronic crime or digital evidence technology assessment 

working groups and the establishment of new working groups. The Center would be responsible 

for management and coordination of working groups composed of subject matter experts with 

relevant expertise to evaluate state-of-the-art commercially available electronic crime or digital 

evidence technologies that can be transferred to the criminal justice community. 

Developing technology guidelines. The Center’s efforts include the development of 

comprehensive guides for law enforcement and other appropriate criminal justice practitioners 

that describe how to plan for, select, and implement technology solutions based on actual 

experience with application of the technology in practice. Examples of existing guides include: A 

Guide for Applying Information Technology for Law Enforcement, Guide for the Selection of 

Commercial Explosives Detection Systems for Law Enforcement Applications, and 

Understanding Wireless Communications in Public Safety. 

Providing technology assistance and support to criminal justice agencies on a national 

basis. The Center is expected to provide specialized technology assistance within its particular 

technology areas of responsibility. These efforts will focus on providing science and engineering 

advice and support to assist first adopter law enforcement, corrections, and other criminal 

justice agencies with the use of new technologies or the adaptation of existing technologies to 

enhance their effectiveness, efficiency, and safety. The Center will be expected to provide, in its 

specialty area, national expertise for the criminal justice community’s ongoing efforts to 

continuously improve operations through the adoption of new tools and methods. (Note: The 

Center will not be funded or expected to provide assistance to agencies that are adopting 

technologies that are well established in practice.) Appropriate assistance is to be provided to all 

facets of the criminal justice community, including small and rural law enforcement, corrections, 

school resource officers, or other tribal, State, and local practitioner communities. As part of 

these efforts, NIJ is interested in having the Center implement a web-based resource center. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 6 
 

This would include management and coordination of a Criminal Justice Electronic Crime 

Technology Resource Center, a password-protected Web forum that makes information 

available on current and emerging technologies, and practitioner information. This Web-based 

resource will be maintained on the NLECTC System’s Justice Information Network (JUSTNET) 

or linked to JUSTNET. 

While the Center will, to a certain extent, perform ongoing work related to responding to calls for 

assistance forwarded from the Regional Technology Centers, the Center should expect that the 

majority of its work will be on projects specifically defined by NIJ in support of the specific 

technology investment portfolio areas. For this reason and others (such as the possibility of 

establishment, modification, or elimination of particular technology investment portfolios by NIJ; 

changes in the availability of funds; or the desire to capitalize on technology opportunities), 

applicants should expect that the level and direction of effort may vary significantly during the 

project period (or from year to year, should supplemental funding be made available). 

Successful applicants therefore must demonstrate the ability to readily add or reduce capacity in 

relevant areas under the guidance of the NIJ program manager without adversely affecting the 

ability to provide services or incurring unacceptable additional costs. In this connection, NIJ is 

very interested in considering applications that propose to leverage existing programs, facilities, 

and personnel. 

Please note: All applicants under this solicitation must comply with Department of Justice 

regulations on confidentiality and human subjects protection. See “Other Requirements for OJP 

Applications” at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/other_requirements.htm. 

What will not be funded: 

1. Provision of training or direct service. 

2. Proposals primarily to purchase equipment, materials, or supplies. (Your budget may 

include these items if they are necessary to conduct applied research, development, 

demonstration, evaluation, or analysis.) 

3. Work that will be funded under another specific solicitation. 

4. Applications that do not demonstrate the capability to perform the work proposed. 

5. Applications that propose to develop technology. 

6. Applications to provide general technology assistance on a regional basis or to rural 

law enforcement agencies. This work will be supported within the existing structure 

of the NLECTC System. 

Amount and length of awards: This solicitation is expected to result in one award, and total 

funding for this solicitation in FY 2010 is anticipated to be up to $2 million. Supplements to that 

award, if any, over the balance of the three year period are expected to be between $2 million 

and $4 million per year. All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and 

to any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by law. 

Applicants should be aware that the total period for an award, including one that receives 

additional funding, ordinarily will not exceed 3 years. A grant made by NIJ under this solicitation 

may account for up to 100 percent of the total cost of the project. See "Cofunding" under "What 

an Application Must Include." 

Budget Information 

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver: With respect to 

any award of more than $250,000 made under this solicitation, Federal funds may not be used 

to pay total cash compensation (salary plus bonuses) to any employee of the award recipient at 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 7 
a rate that exceeds 110% of the maximum annual salary payable to a member of the Federal 

Government’s Senior Executive Service (SES) at an agency with a Certified SES Performance 

Appraisal System for that year. (The 2010 salary table for SES employees is available at 

http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/indexSES.asp.) Note: A recipient may compensate an 

employee at a higher rate, provided the amount in excess of this compensation limitation is paid 

with non-Federal funds. (Any such additional compensation will not be considered matching 

funds where match requirements apply.) 

The limitation on compensation rates allowable under an award may be waived on an individual 

basis at the discretion of the Director of the National Institute of Justice. An applicant that 

wishes to request a waiver must include a detailed justification in the budget narrative of its 

application. Unless the applicant submits a waiver request and justification with the application, 

the applicant should anticipate that OJP will request that the applicant adjust and resubmit its 

budget. 

The justification should include: the particular qualifications and expertise of the individual, the 

uniqueness of the service being provided, the individual’s specific knowledge of the program or 

project being undertaken with award funds, and a statement explaining that the individual’s 

salary is commensurate with the regular and customary rate for an individual with his/her 

qualifications and expertise, and for the work that is to be done. 

Performance Measures 

To assist in fulfilling the Department’s responsibilities under the Government Performance and 

Results Act (GPRA), P.L. 103–62, applicants who receive funding under this solicitation must 

provide data that measure the results of their work. Additionally, applicants must discuss in their 

application their methods for collecting data for performance measures. Please refer to “What 

an Application Must Include,” page 11, for additional information on applicant responsibilities for 

collecting and reporting data. Performance measures for this solicitation are as follows: 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 8 
Objective Performance Measure(s) Data Grantee Provides 

To facilitate the adoption of new 1. Relevance to the needs of the 1. Individual project reports 

tools and technologies into practice field as measured by whether the responding to the requirements 

by criminal justice agencies through grantee’s substantive scope did of a specific project detailing the 

testing, evaluation, and the provision not deviate from the funded Center's activities including: the 

of technology assistance. proposal or any subsequent 

agency modifications to the 

scope. 

2. Quality of the research as 

assessed by peer reviewers. 

3. Quality of management as 

measured by whether significant 

interim project milestones were 

achieved, final deadlines were 

met, and costs remained within 

approved limits. 

number of research, testing and 

evaluation, and demonstration 

activities conducted; the number 

of technologies successfully 

adopted into service; the number 

of technology guides published; 

the number of calls for assistance 

responded to. 

2. A final report providing a 

comprehensive overview of the 

project and a detailed description 

of the project design, data, and 

methods; a full presentation of 

4. If applicable, number of NIJ final 

grant reports, NIJ research 

documents, and grantee 

research documents published. 

scientific findings; and a thorough 

discussion of the implications of 

the project findings for criminal 

justice practice and policy in the 

United States. 

3. Quarterly financial reports, semiannual progress reports, and a 

final progress report. 

4. If applicable, each data set that 

was collected, acquired, or 

modified in conjunction with the 

project. 

5. If applicable, citation to 

report(s)/document(s). 

How to Apply 

Applications will be submitted through OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS). GMS is a 

Web-based, data-driven computer application that provides cradle to grave support for the 

application, award and management of grants at OJP. Applicants should begin the process 

immediately to meet the GMS registration deadline, especially if this is the first time they have 

used the system. Complete instructions on how to register and submit an application in GMS 

can be found at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmscbt/. If you experience technical difficulties at any point 

during this process, please e-mail GMSHelpDesk@usdoj.gov, or call 1–888–549–9901 (option 

3), Monday–Friday from 6:00 a.m. to midnight eastern time, except for Federal holidays. OJP 

highly recommends starting the registration process as early as possible to prevent delays in 

the application submission by the specified deadline. 

All applicants are required to complete the following steps. 

1. Acquire a DUNS Number. A DUNS number is required to submit an application in 

GMS. The Office of Management and Budget requires that all businesses and nonprofit 

applicants for Federal funds include a DUNS (Data Universal Numbering System) 

number in their application for a new award or renewal of an existing award. A DUNS 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 9 
number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for 

identifying and keeping track of entities receiving Federal funds. The identifier is used for 

tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for Federal 

assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS number will be used 

throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one-time activity. 

Obtain a DUNS number by calling 1–866–705–5711 or by applying online at 

www.dunandbradstreet.com. Individuals are exempt from this requirement. 

2. Acquire or Renew Registration with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) 

Database. CCR registration is required to receive funding. OJP requires that all 

applicants (other than individuals) for Federal financial assistance maintain current 

registrations in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. The CCR database 

is the repository for standard information about Federal financial assistance applicants, 

recipients, and subrecipients. Organizations that have previously submitted applications 

via Grants.gov are already registered with CCR, as it is a requirement for Grants.gov 

registration. Please note, however, that applicants must update or renew their CCR 

registration at least once per year to maintain an active status. Information about CCR 

registration procedures can be accessed at www.ccr.gov. 

3. Acquire a GMS Username and Password. If you are a new user, please create a GMS 

profile by selecting the first time user link under the sign-in box of the GMS home page. 

For more information on how to register in GMS, go to www.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmscbt/. 

4. Search for the Funding Opportunity on GMS. After you log in to GMS or complete 

your GMS profile for your username and password, go to the Funding Opportunities link 

on the left hand side of the page. Please select “National Institute of Justice” and then 

“NIJ FY 10 Criminal Justice Electronic Crime Technology Center of Excellence.” 

5. Select the Apply Online Button Associated with the Solicitation Title. The search 

results from step 4 will display the solicitation title along with the Registration and 

Application Deadlines for this funding opportunity. Please select the Apply Online button 

in the Action Column to create an application in the system. 

6. Submit an Application Addressing All of the Requirements Outlined in this 

Solicitation by Following the Directions in GMS. Once submitted, GMS will display a 

confirmation screen stating your submission was successful. Important: You are urged 

to submit your application at least 72 hours prior to the due date of the application. 

Note: OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS) does not accept executable file types as 

application attachments. These disallowed file types include, but are not limited to, the 

following extensions: ".com," ".bat," ".exe," ".vbs," ".cfg," ".dat," ".db," ".dbf," ".dll," ".ini," ".log," 

".ora," ".sys," and ".zip." 

Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues 

If you experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond your control which prevent you from 

submitting your application by the deadline, you must contact the NIJ staff member listed on the 

title page within 24 hours after the deadline and request approval to submit your application. 

At that time, NIJ staff will require you to e-mail the complete grant application, your DUNS 

number, and provide a GMS Help Desk tracking number(s). After the program office reviews all 

of the information submitted, and contacts the GMS Helpdesk to validate the technical issues 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 10 
you reported, OJP will contact you to either approve or deny your request to submit a late 

application. If the technical issues you reported cannot be validated, your application will be 

rejected as untimely. 

To ensure a fair competition for limited discretionary funds, the following conditions are not valid 

reasons to permit late submissions: (1) failure to begin the registration process in sufficient time; 

(2) failure to follow GMS instructions on how to register and apply as posted on its Web site; (3) 

failure to follow all of the instructions in the OJP solicitation; and (4) technical issues 

experienced with the applicant’s computer or information technology (IT) environment. 

Notifications regarding known technical problems with GMS are posted on the OJP funding Web 

page, www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/solicitations.htm. 

What an Application Must Include 

OJP strongly recommends use of appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., “Program 

Narrative,” “Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative,” “Timelines,” “Memoranda of 

Understanding,” “Resumes”) for all required attachments. Where resumes are required, OJP 

recommends that all resumes be included in a single file. 

Standard Form 424 

Please see www07.grants.gov/assets/SF424Instructions.pdf for instructions on how to 

complete your SF424. When selecting "type of applicant," if the applicant is a for-profit 

entity, please select "For-Profit Organization" or "Small Business" (as applicable) in the 

“Type of Applicant” data field. For-profit applicants also may select additional applicable 

categories (e.g., "Private Institution of Higher Education"). 

 Program Narrative 

Applicants should structure their narrative around a core program addressing both the 

ongoing technology assistance activities and the following anticipated projects for a 

twelve-month project period commencing October 1, 2010. The program narrative 

should also address the applicant's ability to scale during the project period to provide 

services in the six areas identified under "Specific Information," above (e.g., identifying 

technology requirements, supporting NIJ’s research and development program). 

Applicants should include in their narrative: 

•	 Demonstration of expertise in technological and operational evaluations in a lab 

and/or operational setting, including but not limited to: 

o	 appropriate research design(s) and methodology; 

o	 statistical techniques and analysis; and 

o	 implications for policy and practice in law enforcement settings. 

•	 Demonstration of a proven track record with testing and evaluation of electronic 

crime or digital evidence technologies in a lab and operational environment. 

•	 A management plan for an electronic crime or digital evidence technologies test 

and evaluation program. 

o	 Given the availability of funds, the applicant will develop an appropriate 

template for outcome-based operational evaluations and implement at 

least one such evaluation, with guidance from the NIJ Electronic Crime 

Technology portfolio manager. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 11 
Applicants proposing to operate the Criminal Justice Electronic Crime Technology 

Center of Excellence must demonstrate ability to leverage expertise in the technology 

portfolios they seek to support, including knowledge of the NIJ program and related 

efforts in the scientific research community and commercial market, as needed to 

provide the testing and evaluation functions described in the Specific Information 

section. 

The Program Narrative includes: 

a. Cover page 

b. Abstract (not to exceed 600 words). 

c. Table of contents. 

d. Main body, which includes: 

• Purpose, goals, and objectives. 

• Review of relevant literature. 

• Approach to achieving goals and objectives (program design and 

implementation). 

• Research independence and integrity (see “Selection Criteria,” below). 

• Implications for criminal justice policy and practice in the United States. 

• Management plan and organization. 

• Dissemination strategy. 

e. Appendices (not counted against program narrative page limit) include: 

• Bibliography/References (if applicable). 

• List of key personnel (required). 

• Resumes of key personnel (required). 

• List of previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigator(s) (required). 

• Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from 

organizations collaborating in the project (if applicable). 

• Chart for timeline, research calendar, or milestones (required). 

• Human Subjects Protection Paperwork including Institutional Review 

Board (IRB) documentation and forms (see 

http://www.ojp.gov/nij/funding/humansubjects/human-subjects.htm). 

• Privacy Certificate (for further guidance go to 

http://www.ojp.gov/nij/funding/humansubjects/privacy-certificateguidance.htm). 

• List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which you 

have submitted this proposal (if applicable). 

• Other materials required by the solicitation. 

The program narrative section of your application must not exceed 25 double-spaced 

pages in 12-point font with 1-inch margins. Abstract, table of contents, charts, figures, 

appendices, and government forms do not count toward the 25-page limit for the 

narrative section. 

Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative 

A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found at 

www.ojp.gov/funding/forms/budget_detail.pdf. If you submit a different format, you must 

include the budget categories as listed in the sample budget worksheet. 

For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs, 

please see the OJP Financial Guide at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 12 
The Budget Narrative is a plain-language description of each of the proposed 

expenditures listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. It should clearly explain the purpose 

and reason for all expenditures in the budget. There should be no ambiguities about any 

budget item. The narrative also should include details for calculated rates or other 

figures. As with the Budget Detail Worksheet, the Budget Narrative must be broken 

down on a year-by-year basis. 

Cofunding: A grant made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 

percent of the total cost of the project. You must indicate whether you believe it is 

feasible for you to contribute cash, facilities, or services as non-Federal support for the 

project. Your application should identify generally any such contributions that you expect 

to make and your proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, will be 

supported with non-Federal contributions. 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 

Applicants that do not have a federally negotiated indirect cost rate and wish to establish 

one can submit a proposal to their “cognizant” Federal agency. Generally, the cognizant 

Federal agency is the agency that provides the preponderance of direct Federal funding. 

This can be determined by reviewing an organization’s schedule of Federal financial 

assistance. If DOJ is your cognizant Federal agency, obtain information needed to 

submit an indirect cost rate proposal at 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/part3/part3chap17.htm. 

Plan for collecting the data required for performance measures. (See

"Performance Measures," above.) 

The Data Collection Plan is a description of the applicant’s plan for collecting the data 

required for performance measures. Applicants must discuss this plan in their 

applications. The plan must describe how the performance measures data will be 

derived, state who will be responsible for collecting the data, and state that the data will 

be available for review 3 years post award, as required. The data collection plan should 

be rigorous to ensure that the performance measure data provided are accurate, 

auditable, and correctly measure the impact of the Federal funds provided. 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) 

If an application is being submitted by either (1) a tribe or tribal organization, or (2) by a 

third party proposing to provide direct services or assistance to residents on tribal lands, 

then a current authorizing resolution of the governing body of the tribal entity or other 

enactment of the tribal council or comparable governing body authorizing the inclusion of 

the tribe or tribal organization and its residents must be included with the application. In 

those instances when an organization or consortium of tribes proposes to apply for a 

grant on behalf of a tribe or multiple specific tribes, then the application must include a 

resolution from all tribes that will be included as a part of the services/assistance 

provided under the grant. 

If an applicant is unable to obtain a signed copy of a tribal resolution documenting 

support for its application, then, at a minimum, the applicant must submit an unsigned, 

draft tribal resolution as part of its application. If an applicant fails to submit either a 

signed or an unsigned copy of a tribal resolution as part of its application, then it will be 

eliminated from funding consideration. If selected for funding, any applicant that has 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 13 
submitted an unsigned tribal resolution must submit the signed copy of the tribal 

resolution to OJP within 30 days of acceptance of the award. In all such cases, use of 

and access to funds will be contingent on receipt of the signed tribal resolution. 

Other Standard Forms 

Additional forms that may be required are available on OJP’s funding page at 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/forms.htm. Please note in particular the following 

forms. 

1. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other 

Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (required of all 

applicants as part of the GMS application process) 

2. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (required for any applicant that expends any 

funds for lobbying activities) 

3. Accounting System and Financial Capability Questionnaire (required for any 

applicant that is a nongovernmental entity and that has not received any award 

from OJP within the past 3 years) 

4. Standard Assurances (required of all applicants as part of the GMS application 

process) 

Note: Attachments to the application should be included in one of the following four 

categories: 1) Program Narrative; 2) Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative; 3) 

Appendices; and 4) Other Requirements. 

Selection Criteria 

Statement of the Problem (Understanding of the problem and its importance)—15% 

Applications must reflect an understanding of the unique challenges of the wide variety 

of different criminal justice practitioners throughout the nation, including large and small 

departments in urban, suburban, and rural settings. 

Project/Program Design and Implementation (Quality and technical merit)—30% 

1. Awareness of the state of current research or technology. 

2. Soundness of methodology and analytic and technical approach. 

3. Feasibility of proposed project and awareness of pitfalls. 

4. Innovation and creativity (when appropriate). 

Capabilities/Competencies (Capabilities, demonstrated productivity, and experience of 

applicants)—20% 

1. Qualifications and experience of proposed staff. 

2. Demonstrated ability of proposed staff and organization to manage the effort. 

3. Adequacy of the plan to manage the project, including how various tasks are subdivided 

and resources are used. 

4. Successful past performance on NIJ grants and contracts (when applicable). 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 14 
 

Budget—15% 

1. Total cost of the project relative to the perceived benefit. 

2. Appropriateness of the budget relative to the level of effort. 

3. Use of existing resources to conserve costs. 

Impact/Outcomes and Evaluation/Plan for Collecting Data for Performance Measures 

(Relevance to policy and practice)—15% 

1. Potential for significant advances in scientific or technical understanding of the problem. 

2. Potential for significant advances in the field. 

3. Relevance for improving the policy and practice of criminal justice and related agencies 

in the United States and improving public safety, security, and quality of life. 

4. Affordability and cost-effectiveness of proposed end products, when applicable (e.g., 

purchase price and maintenance costs for a new technology or cost of training to use the 

technology). 

5. Perceived potential for commercialization and/or implementation of a new technology 

(when applicable). 

6. Plan for collecting data for performance measures. 

Relevance of the project for policy and practice in the United States 

Higher quality applications clearly explain the practical implications of the project. They 

connect technical expertise with criminal justice policy and practice. To ensure that the 

project has strong relevance for policy and practice, some researchers and technologists 

collaborate with practitioners and policymakers. You may include letters showing support 

from practitioners, but they carry less weight than clear evidence that you understand why 

policymakers and practitioners would benefit from your work and how they would use it. 

While a partnership may affect State or local activities, it should also have broader 

implications for others across the country. 

Dissemination Strategy—5% 

1. Well-defined plan for the grant recipient to disseminate results to appropriate audiences, 

including researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. 

2. Suggestions for print and electronic products NIJ might develop for practitioners and 

policymakers. 

Research Independence and Integrity 

Regardless of a proposal’s rating under the criteria outlined above, in order to receive funds, the 

applicant’s proposal must demonstrate research independence, including appropriate 

safeguards to ensure research objectivity and integrity. 

Considerations in evaluating research independence and integrity will include, but may not be 

limited to, the adequacy of the applicant’s efforts to identify factors that could affect the 

objectivity/integrity of the proposed staff and/or the organization in carrying out the research, 

development, or evaluation activity; and the adequacy of the applicant’s existing or proposed 

remedies to control any such factors. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 15 
Review Process 

OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. NIJ reviews the 

application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, 

measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with basic minimum program or legislative 

requirements as stated in the solicitation including, but not limited to, requirements as to 

timeliness, proper format, and responsiveness to the scope of the solicitation. 

Peer reviewers will be reviewing the applications submitted under this solicitation that meet 

basic minimum requirements. NIJ may use either internal peer reviewers, external peer 

reviewers, or a combination to review the applications under this solicitation. An external peer 

reviewer is an expert in the field of the subject matter of a given solicitation who is NOT a 

current U.S. Department of Justice employee. An internal reviewer is a current U.S. Department 

of Justice employee who is well-versed or has expertise in the subject matter of this solicitation. 

Eligible applications will be evaluated, scored, and rated by a peer review panel. Peer 

reviewers’ ratings and any resulting recommendations are advisory only. In addition to peer 

review ratings, considerations for award recommendations and decisions may include, but are 

not limited to, underserved populations, geographic diversity, strategic priorities, past 

performance, and available funding. 

The Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO), in consultation with NIJ, conducts a financial 

review of applications for potential discretionary awards and cooperative agreements to 

evaluate the fiscal integrity and financial capability of applicants; examines proposed costs to 

determine if the budget and budget narrative accurately explain project costs; and determines 

whether costs are reasonable, necessary, and allowable under applicable Federal cost 

principles and agency regulations. 

All final award decisions will be made by the Director of the National Institute of Justice, who 

also may give consideration to factors including, but not limited to, underserved populations, 

geographic diversity, strategic priorities, past performance, and available funding when making 

awards. 

Additional Requirements 

Applicants selected for awards must agree to comply with additional legal requirements upon 

acceptance of an award. We strongly encourage you to review the information pertaining to 

these additional requirements prior to submitting your application. Additional information for 

each can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/other_requirements.htm. 

• Civil Rights Compliance 

• Faith-Based and Other Community Organizations 

• Confidentiality and Human Subjects Protection (if applicable) 

• Anti-Lobbying Act 

• Financial and Government Audit Requirements 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 16 
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (if applicable) 

• DOJ Information Technology Standards (if applicable) 

• Single Point of Contact Review 

• Nonsupplanting of State or Local Funds 

• Criminal Penalty for False Statements 

• Compliance with Office of Justice Programs Financial Guide 

• Suspension or Termination of Funding 

• Nonprofit Organizations 

• For-Profit Organizations 

• Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) 

• Rights in Intellectual Property 

• Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006 

• Awards in excess of $5,000,000 – Federal taxes certification requirement 

If your proposal is funded, you will be required to submit several reports and other materials, 

including: 

Final substantive report: The final report should be a comprehensive overview of the project 

and should include a detailed description of the project design, data, and methods; a full 

presentation of scientific findings; a thorough discussion of the implications of the project 

findings for criminal justice practice and policy in the United States; etc. It must contain an 

abstract of no more than 600 words and an executive summary of 2,500 to 4,000 words. 

A draft of the final report, abstract, and executive summary must be submitted 90 days before 

the end date of the grant. The draft final report will be peer reviewed upon submission. The 

reviews will be forwarded to the grantee with suggestions for revisions. The author must then 

submit the revised final report, abstract, and executive summary by the end date of the grant. 

The abstract, executive summary, and final report must be submitted in both paper and 

electronic formats. 

For program evaluation studies, the final report should include a section on measuring program 

performance. This section should outline the measures used to evaluate program effectiveness, 

modifications made to those measures as a result of the evaluation, and recommendations 

regarding these and other potential performance measures for similar programs. (This 

information will be particularly valuable to NIJ and other Federal program agencies in 

implementing performance measures for federally funded criminal justice programs.) 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 17 
Interim reports: Grantees must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual progress 

reports, a final progress report, and, if applicable, an annual audit report in accordance with 

Office of Management and Budget Circular A–133. Future awards and fund drawdowns may be 

withheld if reports are delinquent. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013
 18 
 

 

Application Checklist
 

Criminal Justice Electronic Crime Technology Center of Excellence 

The application checklist has been created to aid you in developing your application. 

Eligibility 

_____ Tribal authorizing resolution (if applicable) 

Application Components: 

_____ Program Narrative (see pages 11–12 and “Selection Criteria,” pages 14–15) 

_____ Appendices to the Program Narrative 

_____ Bibliography/References (if applicable) 

_____ List of key personnel (required) 

_____ Resumes of key personnel (required) 

_____ List of previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigators (required) 

_____ Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from organizations 

collaborating in the project (if applicable) 

_____ Chart for timeline, research calendar, or milestones (required) 

_____ Human Subjects Protection Paperwork 

_____ Privacy Certificate 

_____ List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which you have 

submitted this proposal (if applicable) 

_____ Budget Narrative 

_____ Budget Detail Worksheet 

_____ Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 

_____ Plan for Collecting Data for Performance Measures 

Program Narrative/Abstract Format: 

_____ Double-spaced 

_____ 12-point standard font 

_____ 1” standard margins 

_____ Narrative is 25 pages or less 

Other Requirements: 

_____ Standard Form 424 

_____ DUNS number 

_____ Other standard forms as applicable (see page 14), including 

_____ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if applicable)
 

_____ Accounting System and Financial Capability Questionnaire (if applicable)
 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 19