alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of Refugee Resettlement


 Single-Source Program Expansion Supplement

AGENCY: Office of Refugee Resettlement, Administration for Children and 
Families.

ACTION: Notice To Award a Single-Source Program Expansion Supplement to 
the Catholic Social Services (CSS) Under the Alabama Wilson-Fish 
Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA#: 93.583.
    Legislative Authority: The Refugee Act of 1980 as amended, Wilson-
Fish Amendment, 8 U.S.C. 1522(e)(7); section 412(e)(7)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    Amount of Award: $125,163 supplement for current year.
    Project Period: 09/30/2005-09/29/2010.
    Justification for the Exception to Competition: The Wilson-Fish 
program is an alternative to the traditional State-administered welfare 
system for providing integrated assistance and services to refugees, 
asylees, Amerasian Immigrants, Cuban and Haitian Entrants, and 
Trafficking Victims. Alabama is one of 12 sites that has chosen this 
alternative approach.
    The supplemental funds will allow the grantee, Catholic Social 
Services, to provide refugee cash and medical assistance through the 
end of this fiscal year to eligible refugees (and others eligible for 
refugee benefits) under the Alabama Wilson-Fish Program.
    The primary reason for the grantee's supplemental request is a 
higher number of arrivals than anticipated when the grantee's budget 
was submitted and approved last year. The Refugee Act of 1980 mandates 
that the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) reimburse States and 
Wilson-Fish projects for the costs of cash and medical assistance for 
newly arriving refugees. Since 1991, ORR has reimbursed States and 
Wilson-Fish agencies for providing cash and medical assistance to 
eligible individuals during their first eight months in the United 
States.
    Hence, the supplement is consistent with the purposes of the 
Wilson-Fish Program, the Refugee Act of 1980, and ORR policy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Rubenstein, Wilson-Fish Program 
Manager, Office of Refugee Resettlement, Aerospace Building, 8th Floor 
West, 901 D Street, SW., Washington, DC 20447. Telephone: 202-205-5933.

    Dated: August 19, 2008.
David H. Siegel,
Acting Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement.
[FR Doc. E8-20375 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be held. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting 
public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at 
the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 2, and Friday, 
October 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel (TAP) will be held Thursday, October 2, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m., and Friday, October 3, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., in Atlanta, GA. 
If you would like to have the Joint Committee of TAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360, or write 
Patricia Robb, TAP Office, MS-1006-MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or FAX to (414) 231-2363, or you can contact 
us at http://www.improveirs.org. For information to join the Joint 
Committee meeting, contact Patricia Robb at the above number.
    The agenda will include the following: Discussion of issues and 
responses brought to the Joint Committee, office report, and discussion 
of annual meeting.

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-20942 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Bumpus, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered December 4, 1986, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People improperly used the Grand Jury testimony of two prosecution witnesses for impeachment purposes on direct examination is not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the witnesses testified at trial that they had not seen the defendant in the vicinity of the crime scene and that they had not observed the robbery and shooting of the victim. This completely negated their Grand Jury testimony to the effect that they had witnessed the defendant and his codefendant commit the crimes. Accordingly, their trial testimony affirmatively damaged the People’s case and entitled them to introduce the witnesses’ prior Grand Jury testimony *(see,*CPL 60.35; *People v Fitzpatrick,*40 NY2d 44, 51; *People v Coker,*134 AD2d 507).

It was also not error for the trial court to briefly close the courtroom to spectators in order to conduct a hearing to determine whether one of the witnesses would assert her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. There were sufficient facts in the record to support the trial court’s finding that the witness, who lived in the same housing project as the defendant, was fearful of testifying because members of the defendant’s family were in the courtroom *(see, People v Jones,*82 AD2d 674, 680-681; *cf., People v Mateo,*73 NY2d 928).

Furthermore, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict *485of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: February 25, 2008                       /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      The  undersigned  chief  financial  officer of the Registrant  does hereby
certify  that  this  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Act of 1934,  as
amended, and that the information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.

      Dated May 14, 2003               By /s/ Edward B. Kornfeld
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Edward B. Kornfeld
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
National Presto Industries, Inc.
                                   Exhibit 11


The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be
exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                                         First Quarter
                                                      ------------------
                                                        2003       2002
                                                      -------    -------
Net Earnings (loss)(1)                                $ 2,053    $(2,360)
                                                      =======    =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding(2)           6,830      6,837

Common share equivalents relating to stock options          1         --
                                                      -------    -------
Adjusted common and common equivalent
   shares for computation(3)                            6,831      6,837
                                                      =======    =======

Net earnings (loss) per share:
     Basic (1 divided by 2)                           $  0.30    $ (0.35)
                                                      =======    =======
     Diluted (1 divided by 3)                         $  0.30    $ (0.35)
                                                      =======    =======
#### Gertrude Tobjy, Also Known as Judy Tobjy, Respondent, v Ralph A. Tobjy, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR articles 51 and 54 to enforce an Oklahoma judgment of divorce, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated March 1, 1989, as (a) denied those branches of his cross application which were for the imposition of a "constructive trust regarding the property located at 750 Schenck Avenue, Brooklyn, New York” and for "reimbursement for any of the costs incurred in maintaining [that] property”, (b) directed him to convey title to the properties located at "750 Schenck Avenue, Brooklyn, New York” and "3621 South 132nd East Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma, solely in * * * Gertrude (Judy) Tobjy’s name” within 10 days of service of the order with notice of entry, and (c) upon his failure to convey the property located in Brooklyn, authorized the Sheriff of Kings County "to execute and deliver a deed to the properties] pursuant to CPLR 5107”, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated April 12, 1989, which denied his motion denominated as one for renewal.

Ordered that the order dated March 1, 1989, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated April 12, 1989, is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma had personal jurisdiction over the defendant husband who personally appeared in the action for divorce and ancillary relief. Accordingly, the judgment of divorce rendered by that court is entitled to full faith and credit in New York *(see,*US Const, art IV, § 1; *Williams v North Carolina,*317 US 287; *Fauntleroy v Lum,*210 US 230, 236-237). Inasmuch as the Oklahoma court had in personam jurisdiction over the parties, it also had equity jurisdiction with respect to the realty owned by the appellant outside of Oklahoma *(see, Ralske v Ralske,*85 AD2d 598, 599; *Miller v Miller,*109 Misc 2d 982, 983). We find that the defendant husband’s collateral challenges to the judgment of divorce are without merit. Thus, the Supreme Court properly directed the appellant to comply with the terms of the divorce judgment. Accordingly, the order dated March 1, 1989, is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

*304We find that the husband’s motion, characterized as one for renewal, was not based upon new facts unavailable at the time he submitted his original opposition to the wife’s application for enforcement of the judgment of divorce, and is therefore actually a motion to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable *(see, e.g., Mgrditchian v Donato,*141 AD2d 513; *Matter of Bosco,*141 AD2d 639; *Matter of Radish v Colombo,*121 AD2d 722; *see also, Caffee v Arnold,*104 AD2d 352). Consequently, his appeal from the order dated April 12, 1989, is dismissed. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6727 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6727

 To prohibit Federal agencies from restricting the use of convertible 
  virtual currency by a person to purchase goods or services for the 
               person's own use, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2022

 Mr. Davidson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal agencies from restricting the use of convertible 
  virtual currency by a person to purchase goods or services for the 
               person's own use, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RESTRICTING USE OF CONVERTIBLE VIRTUAL 
              CURRENCY BY A PERSON TO PURCHASE GOODS OR SERVICES FOR 
              THE PERSON'S OWN USE.

    (a) In General.--No agency head may prohibit or otherwise restrict 
the ability of a covered user to--
            (1) use virtual currency or its equivalent for such user's 
        own purposes, such as to purchase real or virtual goods and 
        services for the user's own use; or
            (2) conduct transactions through a self-hosted wallet.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Convertible virtual currencies.--A medium of exchange 
        that--
                    (A) has an equivalent value as currency (as defined 
                in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of Federal 
                Regulations (or successor regulations)); or
                    (B) acts as a substitute for currency but may not 
                possess all the attributes (including legal tender 
                status) specified under such section 1010.100.
            (2) Covered user.--The term ``covered user'' means a person 
        that obtains convertible virtual currency to purchase goods or 
        services on that person's own behalf, without regard to the 
        method in which such covered user obtained such convertible 
        virtual currency.
            (3) Self-hosted wallet.--The term ``self-hosted wallet'' 
        means an interface--
                    (A) used to secure and transfer convertible virtual 
                currency; and
                    (B) under which the owner of convertible virtual 
                currency retains independent control over such 
                convertible virtual currency that is secured by such 
                digital interface.
                                 <all>
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.29    
    


 
  Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation & Performance Criteria    
    


2004 Annual Bonus Awards  


        The Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of our Board of Directors approved the following cash bonus payments for the named executive officers for 2004 in
accordance with the performance-based bonus program established during the first quarter of 2004 under our stockholder-approved Incentive Compensation Plan: 



	Clarence P. Cazalot Jr.	 	$	1,900,000
	

Janet F. Clark	
 	
$	

420,000
	

Philip G. Behrman	
 	
$	

305,000
	

Steven B. Hinchman	
 	
$	

295,000
	

Steve J. Lowden	
 	
$	

295,000





2005 Base Salaries (effective April 1, 2005) 


        The
Committee approved base salaries for the named executive officers, effective April 1, 2005, as follows: 



	Clarence P. Cazalot Jr.	 	$	1,100,000
	

Janet F. Clark	
 	
$	

475,000
	

Philip G. Behrman	
 	
$	

335,000
	

Steven B. Hinchman	
 	
$	

335,000
	

Steve J. Lowden	
 	
$	

335,000





2005 Annual Bonus Performance Criteria  


        The Committee also approved the performance criteria for the officers' 2005 annual bonus program under the Incentive Compensation Plan. The Committee established
a 2005 bonus pool for officers based on the Company's 2005 income from operations. Officers' 2005 bonuses, in the aggregate, may not exceed the amount available in that pool. 


        The
Committee also established the following performance measures that, along with individual performance, will be considered in awarding individual bonus payments for 2005: 



	•
	Upstream
Adjusted Net Income per Barrel of Oil Equivalent Competitive Comparison



	•
	Downstream
Adjusted Operating Income per Barrel of Crude Oil Throughput Competitive Comparison



	•
	Safety
Measures



	•
	Environmental
Measures



	•
	Budget/G&A
Cost Measures



	•
	Net
Proved Reserve Additions



	•
	Refining
Mechanical Availability



	•
	Net
Production



	•
	Downstream
Return on Capital Employed



	•
	Marathon
Oil Corporation Stock Price Performance 











	•
	Individual
Performance, including Living the Marathon Values 




        Each
officer's bonus payment will be tied to the performance measures that correspond to the success of his or her respective business unit segment. The Committee reserves the right to
adjust or eliminate an annual bonus award based on its assessment of overall performance. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.29


Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation & Performance Criteria
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 173 (Friday, September 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51876-51877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6295]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Subcommittee Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC), through its Subcommittee 
on Dangerous Goods, Solid Cargos and Containers, will conduct an open 
meeting at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, September 17, 2008, in Room 6103 of 
the United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 Second 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593. The primary purpose of the meeting 
is to prepare for the 13th Session of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) Sub-Committee on Dangerous Goods, Solid Cargoes and 
Containers (DSC) to be held at the IMO Headquarters in London, England 
from September 22-26, 2008. Matters to be considered include:

--Amendments to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code 
and Supplements including harmonization of the IMDG Code with the 
United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
--Amendments to the Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes (BC 
Code) including evaluation of properties of solid bulk cargos.
--Amendments to the Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and 
Securing (CSS Code).
--Casualty and incident reports and analysis.
--Extension of the Code of Practice for the Safe Unloading and Loading 
of Bulk Carriers (BLU Code) to include grain.
--Guidance on providing safe working conditions for securing of 
containers.
--Review of the Recommendations on the Safe Use of Pesticides in Ships.
--Guidance on protective clothing.
--Revision of the Code of Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck 
Cargoes.
--Form and procedure for approval of the Cargo Securing Manual.
--Stowage of water-reactive materials.

[[Page 51877]]

--Amendments to the International Convention for Safe Containers.
--Review of the Guidelines for Packing of Cargo Transport Units.
--Review of documentation requirements for dangerous goods in packaged 
form.

    Members of the public may attend the meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Mr. R.C. Bornhorst, U.S. Coast Guard (CG-5223), Room 1210, 
2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling (202) 
372-1426.

    Dated: August 21, 2008.
Mark Skolnicki,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E8-20631 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P