alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.2



                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


                      OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between
Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-2 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee,
dated as of May 1, 2006, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

        1.     A review of the activities of the Subservicer and of its
               performance under the Nelnet, Inc. Subservicing Agreement during
               the period from May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 has been
               made under my supervision; and

        2.     Based on my knowledge of such review, the Subservicer has
               fulfilled in all material respects all its obligations under the
               Nelnet, Inc. Subservicing Agreement during such period.

April 2, 2007


By:     /s/ TERRY J. HEIMES
        --------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Treasurer,
        Nelnet, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          24,161
<SECURITIES>                                    83,289
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,219
<PP&E>                                       1,817,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                 565,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,618,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,005,296
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,210,417)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,618,861
<SALES>                                        301,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               306,672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               276,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,880)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
1 ... T h e r el ev an t or der s i n t h i s c as e we r e f i r s t s i g n ed by t h e H on or abl e I r ma D
. H er n an dez , As s oci at e Ju dg e of t he 28 9t h J udi ci al D i s t r i ct Co ur t , an d t hen coun t er s i gn ed by t he H onorabl e Car men K el s ey , Ju dge of t he 18 9t h J udi ci al D istric t C o u rt. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 74 1- CV In the MATTER OF D .M.R. Fr om the 289th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-JUV-01866 Honora ble Carmen Ke lsey , J udg e Presiding 1 Opinion by : Marialy

n Ba rnar d, J ustice Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 14, 2010 MOTI ON TO WI THDRAW GRANTED; AF FI RMED D.M.R., a juvenile, plea ded true to one alleg ed probation violation in response to the State’s
se c on d mo tio n to mod if y dis po sit ion , a

nd the State a

ba nd on e d tw o ot her alleg e d v iol atio ns . F oll ow inga

dis po sit ion

he ari ng , th e tr ia l c ourt

pla c e d D .M .R. in t

he c us tod y of the Chi e f Juv e nil e Probation Offic er of

Be x ar County for the purpose of place ment outside the home. D.M.R. filed a timely notice of a

ppeal.04

- 09

- 00 74 1- CV

- 2- D.M.R.’s court-a

ppointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdrawand a br ief in which sh e a sse rt s the re are no me ri tor iou s issu e s to ra ise on a pp e a l. C ouns e l’ s b ri e f m e e ts the re qu ir e me nts of An de rs v . Ca lif

or nia , 386 U.S. 73 8 , (1 9 6 7 ), Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Ga ino us v . S

tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). See I n re D.A.S. , 973 S.W .2d 296, 297 (Tex. 1998) (

An de rs proce dures apply to a ppeals from juvenile delinquenc y adjudications); In re A.L.H. , 974 S.W .2d 359, 360 (Tex. App.—San Antoni o 1998, no pet.) (sa me). Counsel states she has pr ovided the juvenile a nd her guardia

n cop i es o f t h e brief a

nd motion to wit hdrawand informed them of the juvenile’ s rig ht to review the rec ord and f ile her own brief. See A .L.H. , 974 S.W. 2d at 36 0- 61 ; Nic ho ls v . S

tate , 954 S.W .2d 83, 85-86 (Tex . App.—San Antonio, 1997, no pet.); Brun s v . S

tate , 924 S.W .2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. A pp.—San Antonio 1996, no pe t.). No pro se brief has bee n filed. Af te r r e vie wi ngthe re c or d a nd c ouns e l’ s b ri e f, we fi nd

no reve rs ibl e e rr or

and a g re e wi th counsel that the a

ppeal is wholly

frivolous. See Ble ds oev . S tate , 1 7 8 S. W. 3 d

8 2 4 , 8 2 6

- 2 7 ( T e x. Crim. App. 2005). We there fore g rant the motion to withdraw f iled by D.M.R.’s appellate counsel and aff irm the trial cour

t’s judgme nt. See id .; Nic ho ls v . S tate , 954 S.W .2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Brun s v . S tate , 924 S.W .2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. A pp.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc
Address:   388 Greenwich Street
           New York, New York 10013

Form 13F File Number:              28-2568

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Howard M. Darmstadter
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7392

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Howard M. Darmstadter          New York, New York     November 12, 1999
-------------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.11.2  


Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") To

Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") between

Jeffrey T. Hinson ("Employee") and Univision Management Co. ("Company")  


Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 


        1.    Term.    The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31,
2007, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement. 


        2.    Salary.    The annual Base Salary rate will be Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000)
for the annual period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. 


        3.    Effective Date of Amendment.    Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment
will become effective as of December 31, 2004. 


        4.    Other.    Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed. 



	 	 	UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  C. DOUGLAS KRANWINKLE      
 C. Douglas Kranwinkle

Vice President and Secretary
	/s/  JEFFREY T. HINSON      
 Jeffrey T. Hinson
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                                     Unaudited
                                                  Six months ended
                                                       June 30

                                                  2000      1999
<S>                                               <C>       <C>
Source of Cash:
     Net income                                   $416      $418

     Decrease in accounts payable                   (7)       (6)

          Cash provided from operations           $409      $412


Use of Cash:

     Dividends paid                                408       408

     Increase (decrease) in cash                  $  1      $  4
</TABLE>

Notes:

     (1)  The foregoing interim financial statements are unaudited but,
          in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments
          necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations
          for the interim periods.

     (2)  Registrant has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a
          real estate investment trust. As such, the Trust is exempt
          from paying federal corporate income tax on any income that is
          distributed to shareholders. It has been Registrant's policy
          to distribute annually all of its ordinary taxable income.
          Consequently, no provision has been made for federal income
          tax.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Lott, Appellant.

Motion by the appellant *pro se*for a writ of error corana nobis to vacate a decision and order of this court dated October 3, 1988 [143 AD2d 686], which determined an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 4, 1985.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               4,812
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          7,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    31,587
<PP&E>                                               4,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      52,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,638
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                93
<OTHER-SE>                                          11,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        52,085
<SALES>                                             16,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    16,292
<CGS>                                                9,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        675
<INCOME-TAX>                                            16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    704
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         76
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           780
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.08
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 172 (Thursday, September 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51687-51688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/79-0453]


Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption 
Under Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of 
Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., 360 
Post Street, Suite 601, San Francisco, CA 94108, a Federal Licensee 
under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the 
Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought 
an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, 
Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt 
security financing to LDR Holding Corporation, 4030 W. Braker Lane, 
Suite 360, Austin, TX 78759. The financing is contemplated for working 
capital and growth purposes.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because Telegraph Hill Partners II, L.P., THP II 
Affiliates Fund, L.P., THP Affiliates Fund, L.P., all Associates of 
Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., in the aggregate own more

[[Page 51688]]

than ten percent of LDR Holding Corporation, and therefore LDR Holding 
Corporation is considered an Associate of Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC 
as described in 13 CFR 107.50.
    Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an 
Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any 
interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within 
fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate 
Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: August 12, 2008.
A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
 [FR Doc. E8-20458 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52726-52727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer 
Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 15, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via a telephone 
conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie 
Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, 
FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to 
participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with 
Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-
7979, or post

[[Page 52727]]

comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: August 29, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-20945 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-11361 Conference Calendar

EDDIE GILMER HAYSLETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus R. LUNA, Police Officer; L. GIOENI, Police Officer; UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICER, Carrollton, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CV-1278-G

-------------------- October 17, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Eddie Gilmer Hayslett, Texas prisoner # 799149, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1). The district court did not err indismissing Hayslett's false-arrest claim as barred by the twoyear statute of limitations because the cause of action accrued in May 1994. See Martin v. Scott , 156 F.3d 578, 580 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 2405 (1999); Ruiz v. United
States , 160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir. 1998); Burrell v. Newsome ,No. 99-11361 -2- 883 F.2d 416, 418 (5th Cir. 1989). The district court did not err in dismissing Hayslett's malicious-prosecution claim as lacking an arguable basis in fact because neither Hayslett's complaint nor his supplemental questionnaire alleged facts sufficient to establish the elements of a malicious-prosecution claim. See Martin , 156 F.3d at 580; Taylor v. Gregg , 36 F.3d 453, 455 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Hayslett's appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal and the district court's dismissal of this lawsuit as frivolous count as two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Hayslett previously had at least one other strike under § 1915(g) because of the dismissal of Hayslett v. Fawns , No. 3:93-CV-1820-T (N.D. Tex. Dec. 20, 1993), which he did not appeal. See Adepegba , 103 F.3d at 388. Hayslett has now accumulated at least three strikes, and therefore while he is a prisoner he is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal brought in a United States court unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; § 1915(g) SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
#### Laura Villanova et al., Appellants, v King Kullen Supermarkets et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J.), entered on or about April 24, 1989, *inter alia,*granting defendants’ motions (CPLR 3211 [a] [5]) to dismiss the complaint due to the expiration of the three-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 214), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether plaintiffs were entitled to the benefit of CPLR 205 (a) upon dismissal of their initial verified complaint for failure to proceed. CPLR 205 (a) provides that upon dismissal of an action other than by "voluntary discontinuance, a dismissal of the complaint for neglect to prosecute the action, or a final judgment upon the merits, the plaintiff * * * may commence a new action upon the same [cause of action] within six months after the termination”. Plaintiffs’ failure to appear and the subsequent dismissal of the original action constituted a dismissal "for neglect to prosecute” within the meaning of CPLR 205 (a). *(Laffey v City of New York,*72 AD2d 685 [1st Dept 1979], *affd*52 NY2d 796 [1980]; *Wright v Defelice & Son,*22 AD2d 962 [2d Dept 1964], *affd*17 NY2d 586 [1966].) That the same court which dismissed the original complaint decided the motions resulting in the order appealed supports this conclusion. *(See, Schuman v Hertz Corp.,*17 NY2d 604 [1966].) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
#### PALM BEACH ACREAGE CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Margaret G. DAY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

May 21, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Continental Beverage and Nutrition, Inc. (“Continental”) because it has not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Continental.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of Continental is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 3, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 16, 2008.

By the Commission.

Florence E. Harmon,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-20707 Filed 9-3-08; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P