alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.11

Gregory Myers Ph.D

September 28, 2006

|Re: | Energy Metals Corporation           
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | Annual Information Form and Form 40F

I am the author of the following Technical Reports
entitled:

- Aurora Uranium Project, Malheur County, Oregon dated March 13, 2005;
- Section 19 and 29 Portions of the Crownpoint Property, McKinley County,
  New Mexico dated April 7, 2006;
- Section 24 Portion of the Crownpoint Property, McKinley County, New Mexico
  dated March 2, 2006
- Hosta Butte Property, McKinley County, New Mexico dated April 18, 2006

(the Reports) referred to in the Annual Information Form and
Form 40F of Energy Metals Corporation dated September 28, 2006 (the "AIF and
40F"). I consent to being named in both the AIF and 40F and to the use of the
Report in the AIF and 40F.

I have read the AIF and 40F and confirm that:

| | (a) | I have no reason to believe that there are any
      misrepresentations in the information contained in the AIF and 40F derived
      from the Report or that is within my knowledge as a result of the
      investigations and enquiries made by me in connection with the preparation
      of the Report; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (b) | the section in the AIF Description of Business fairly
      and accurately summarizes the Report and omits no material information
      contained in the Report.                                                                                                                                              

Yours truly,

Per: /s/ Greg Meyers

---
#### Lori Whitaker, as Administratrix of the Estate of William D. Whitaker, Appellant, v Mercy Hospital et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 4.)

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue *(see, Lewis v Williamsville Tower Assocs.,*144 AD2d 923). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J.—reargument.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adam H. Bernstein, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *People v Bernstein*([appeal No. 1] 163 AD2d 842 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Corning, J.—violation of probation.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 172 (Thursday, September 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 18, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Joseph E. O'Brien, Peoria, Illinois, to acquire control of 
Marshall-Putnam County Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire control of Marshall County State Bank, both of Varna, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 29, 
2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-20474 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906






Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of ChyronHego Corporation, a New York corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:






The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated:
March 14, 2014

/s/ Johan ApelJohan ApelPresident andChief Executive OfficerDated:
March 14, 2014

/s/ Dawn JohnstonDawn JohnstonInterim Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our report dated February 23, 2018 , relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 .


No. 333-24817 (on Form S-8)


No. 333-49981 (on Form S-8)


No. 333-126714 (on Form S-8)


No. 333-178075 (on Form S-8)


No. 333-200437 (on Form S-3)


No. 333-186941 (on Form S-8)


No. 333-214701 (on Form S-8)


No. 333-221629 (on Form S-3)








/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Cincinnati, Ohio


February 23, 2018
IB

Union Calendar No. 116

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 51

[Report No. 107–198]

Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to the

products of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 2001

Mr. ARMEY (for himself, Mr. GEPHARDT, and Mr. CRANE) (all by request):

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with

respect to the products of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress approves the extension of nondiscrim4 inatory treatment with respect to the products of the So-
2

•HJ 51 RH

1 cialist Republic of Vietnam transmitted by the President

2 to the Congress on June 8, 2001.

Union Calendar No. 116

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 51

[Report No. 107–198]

JOINT RESOLUTION

Approving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to the products of the Socialist

Republic of Vietnam.

SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/090,042 entitled “Ratchet Hook Tourniquet,” filed August 19, 2008. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention. 

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention is an improvement of the traditional ratchet tourniquet used to stop uncontrollable bleeding from gunshot wounds and blast injuries to the arms and legs. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-20724 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
1

The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1637

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Kenneth J. Frowner, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Ken Dog, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 7, 2002

 Filed: August 23, 2002

___________

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Frowner pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery, in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2113(a) and (d). In accordance with Frowner’s plea agreement, the

district court1

 sentenced him to 160 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised

release. The court also ordered him to pay $145,632.16 in restitution. On appeal,

counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in finding that Frowner was a career
-2-

offender. In his pro se supplemental brief, Frowner argues that the career-offender

enhancement violated Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and that the

district court plainly erred in not addressing each of his objections to the presentence

report (PSR).

The district court did not err in imposing the 160-month sentence to which

Frowner had agreed. See United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995).

Moreover, (1) Frowner did not object to the paragraphs of the PSR describing the

prior robbery and drug offenses that made the career-offender enhancement

applicable, see U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1, 4B1.2 comment. (n.1); United States v. Montanye,

996 F.2d 190, 192-93 (8th Cir. 1993) (en banc); (2) Apprendi does not apply because

Frowner was sentenced to less than the statutory maximum of 25 years, see 18 U.S.C.

§ 2113(d); United States v. Miller, Nos. 01-1861, 01-2525, 2002 WL 1448330, at *2

(8th Cir. Jul. 8, 2002); and (3) any failure of the district court to address each of

Frowner’s objections was harmless, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a). Following our

independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous

issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
------------------------

    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
    May 17, 2004

<FN>
* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
  been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will
  be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.
Exhibit
13.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended January
31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joao (John) da
Costa, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2. | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:
    May 31, 2022 |                                               
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------
|                       |                                               
|                       | /s/
    Joao (John) da Costa                  
|                       | Joao
    (John) da Costa                      
|                       | Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Rescind 1990 Cruise Ship Management Policy, Glacier Bay National 
Park & Preserve, Alaska

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Rescind 1990 Cruise Ship Management Policy, Glacier Bay 
National Park & Preserve, Alaska.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Effective with publication of this public notice, the National 
Park Service (NPS) has rescinded a policy concerning management of 
cruise ships in Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve which was 
originally published in the Federal Register on May 31, 1990 (FR, Vol. 
55, No. 105, page 22108, 5/31/1990, FR Doc. 9012551). In summary, the 
policy was intended to increase opportunities for competitive award of 
cruise ship use days into Glacier Bay and to enhance visitor 
opportunities to select from a wider variety of cruise ship operations. 
These objectives were to be accomplished under the 1990 policy 
primarily by limiting the transferability of concession permits for 
cruise ship tours in Glacier Bay, limiting the scope of a preference in 
renewal of concessions permits that would otherwise apply, and granting 
additional renewal preferences.
    However, in 1998, the Congress revised and reconfirmed the 
management of NPS concession contract authorizations through the NPS 
Concessions Management Improvement Act of 1998, Public Law 105-391, 
November 13, 1998. This law does not permit the continued 
implementation of most of the operative provisions of the 1990 policy 
such that the policy can no longer be implemented to achieve its 
objectives. Accordingly, the NPS has rescinded the 1990 policy. 
However, NPS does intend to continue to encourage the award of multiple 
concession contracts to different operators for Glacier Bay cruise 
operations so as to enhance visitor choices in visiting Glacier Bay by 
cruise ship. This will be accomplished primarily by limiting the number 
of cruise ship use days permitted under applicable cruise ship 
concessions contracts, thereby increasing the number of concession 
contracts available for award.

DATES: February 5, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Apgar, Concession Program 
Manager, Alaska Region, telephone: (907) 644-3361, e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#216a4457484f7e6051464053614f51520f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="39725c4f50576678495e584b7957494a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>, or National Park Service, Attn. Kevin Apgar, 240 West 
5th Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99501.

    Dated: December 27, 2007.
Daniel N. Wenk,
Deputy Director, National Park Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-2095 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-HX-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Polymer Research Corporation of America
                     Certification under Section 906 of the
                Sarbanes/Oxley Act- Filed as an exhibit to 10-QSB
                      for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polymer Research Corp. of America
(the"Company") On Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I Carl
Horowitz, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


May 14, 2003                                by: s/ Carl Horowitz Chief
                                                ----------------------
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
DANIEL FUCCI,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0208

Opinion filed February 3, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Daniel Fucci, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

LEWIS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 20, 2007

Mr. David W. Townend

The Townend Law Firm

18601 LBJ Freeway, Suite 440

Mesquite, TX 75150

Honorable Adolph Canales

Judge, 298th Judicial District Court

600 Commerce St., 6th Floor, Suite 428

Dallas, TX 75202-4606

Mr. Ken Braxton Jr.

Stewart Stimmel LLP 

1701 Market Street, Suite 318, LB 18

Dallas, TX 75202

RE:Case Number:  05-0771

Court of Appeals Number:  05-05-00520-CV

Trial Court Number:  03-00497-M

Style:IN RE  MICHAEL ANGELO BASCO, M.D.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 05-0771Page 1**
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Green Irons Holdings Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Andrew
Couvell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 9th day of August, 2007.

/S/ ANDREW COUVELL
------------------
Andrew Couvell
Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Hajjar, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered December 20, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (five counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
IA

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 2

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit

the Congress to limit expenditures in elections for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to permit the Congress to limit expenditures in

elections for Federal office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 2 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘The Congress shall have authority to limit expendi3 tures in elections for Federal office.’’.

Æ