alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1799V

UNPUBLISHED

AMANDA BRESHEARS,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: September 6, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP , Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Austin Joel Egan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On September 2, 2021, Am anda Breshears filed a petiti on for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U. S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she re ceived on November 9, 2018. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that her injury last ed for more than six mont hs. Petition at ¶10. The case was assigned to the Special Processi ng Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 2, 2022, Respondent fil ed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to co mpensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table (‘ Table’) and the Qualific ations and Aids to

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned ex planation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims ' website in accordance with the E-Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would cons titute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 Interpretation (‘QAI’), which a fford petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no more likely alternative diagnos is and no apparent alternative cause.” Id. at 9.

In view of Respondent’s position a nd the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128146 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

REBECCA BAHAR, TODD COOK, Stephen J. Markman,

DEMITRIOUS ECONOMIDES, SHERRY Justices 

KAYE, DOROTHY OWEN, JAMES RAMEY, 

RYCUS FLOOR COVERING, INC., STEVE

SPIEGEL, and SUMMIT HOSPITALITY, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 128146 

 COA: 260127 

Ingham CC: 03-000122-CB

AMERITECH MICHIGAN, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 82

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan.

Whereas February 6, 2002, is the 91st birthday of Ronald

Wilson Reagan;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is the first former President ever to

attain the age of 91;
2

•HJ 82 EH

Whereas both Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan

have distinguished records of public service to the United

States, the American people, and the international community;

Whereas Ronald Reagan was twice elected by overwhelming

margins as President of the United States;

Whereas Ronald Reagan fulfilled his pledge to help restore

‘‘the great, confident roar of American progress, growth,

and optimism’’ and ensure renewed economic prosperity;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s leadership was instrumental in extending freedom and democracy around the globe and

uniting a world divided by the Cold War;

Whereas Ronald Reagan is loved and admired by millions of

Americans, and by countless others around the world;

Whereas Ronald Reagan’s eloquence united Americans in

times of triumph and tragedy;

Whereas Nancy Reagan not only served as a gracious First

Lady but also led a national crusade against illegal drug

use;

Whereas, together Ronald and Nancy Reagan dedicated their

lives to promoting national pride and to bettering the

quality of life in the United States and throughout the

world; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the

country are with Ronald Reagan in his courageous battle

with Alzheimer’s disease: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress, on behalf of the American people, ex-
3

•HJ 82 EH

1 tends its birthday greetings and best wishes to Ronald

2 Reagan on his 91st birthday.

Passed the House of Representatives February 6,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.

107TH CONGRESS

1D SESSION H. J. RES. 82

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 91st birthday of Ronald Reagan.
H. J. Res. 19

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Joint Resolution

Providing for the appointment of Walter E. Massey as a citizen regent of the

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Frank A.

Shrontz of Washington on May 4, 2000, is filled by the appointment

of Walter E. Massey of Georgia. The appointment is for a term

of 6 years and shall take effect on the date of the enactment

of this joint resolution.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11311 and <greek-i>11312]


Missouri Disaster Number MO-00030

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1773-DR), dated 06/28/
2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2008 through 07/18/2008.
    Effective Date: 08/27/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/10/2008.
    Eidl Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/30/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 06/28/2008 is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 09/10/2008.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)


Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-20846 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2171

CHARLES CRANNELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

PRESIDENT OF M.C.I. TELECOMMUNICATIONS; KAREN

CURIA, M.C.I. Security,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-95-680-WMN)

Submitted: October 30, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Charles Crannell, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Susan Dailey, MORGAN,

LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C.; Robert J. Mathias, John Caleb

Dougherty, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; J. Hardin Marion,

Mary Fran Ebersole, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland;

Hillary B. Burchuk, MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Washington,

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee in his civil action

alleging breach of contract and negligence claims. We conclude the

district court properly found Appellant failed to produce evidence

showing his arrest and murder conviction were proximately caused by

alleged erroneous billing records. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Crannell v. MCI, No. CA-95-680-WMN

(D. Md. July 21, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment

of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, JEFFREY D. SERKES, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                            
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Jeffrey D. Serkes      
|                       |  | Jeffrey D. Serkes          
|Date: November 4, 2005 |  | Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      34,247,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               32,148,335
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,234,530)
<INVENTORY>                                 24,937,903
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            92,731,714
<PP&E>                                     105,605,065
<DEPRECIATION>                            (59,980,323)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,361,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,791,291
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,594,687
<OTHER-SE>                                 104,784,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               147,361,427
<SALES>                                     89,939,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,782,223
<CGS>                                       73,226,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,226,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,995,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               500,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,059,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,291,354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,768,563
<DISCONTINUED>                               (483,627)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,284,936
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34


</TABLE>
#### Eddie Dean WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45633.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1972.

Key, Carr, Evans & Fouts, by Donald M. Hunt, Lubbock, for appellant.

Blair Cherry, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Richard D. Monroe, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lubbock, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

On February 5, 1971, the appellant pled guilty to the offense of burglary with intent to commit theft and was assessed punishment at three years, probated. The conditions of probation, among other things, were that he commit no offense against the laws of this State, work faithfully at suitable employment and pay court costs, and pay child support payments weekly.

On April 28, 1971, a motion to revoke his probation was filed. It alleged that appellant had failed to work faithfully at suitable employment and pay court costs, and that he had failed to pay child support payments as directed. On October 20, 1971, an amended motion to revoke his probation was filed alleging that on October 11, 1971, appellant pled guilty in the County Court at Law No. 2, Lubbock County, Texas, to the offense of driving while intoxicated and was assessed a fine of $125.00 and five days in jail.

A hearing on the motion to revoke was held on November 8, 1971.

The record shows that appellant was represented by appointed counsel at the hearing; his probation was revoked upon the grounds alleged. The appellant personally signed a notice ot appeal. He also ordered an appellate record wherein he stated that no request would be made for a transcription of the court reporter’s notes. Such constitutes a waiver.

Appellant contends that the State failed to offer evidence that he could have worked but did not. His contention can*275not be considered without a transcription of the court reporter’s notes. Matters not supported by the record do not provide the Court any basis for making’ a decision and cannot be considered.

No abuse of discretion being shown, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.5
 AGREEMENT FOR ASSIGNMENT OF AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN REAL
PROPERTY AND ITS APPURTENANCES
 9th




---



##### 



Assignment
 Purchase Price
 Term
 ***
    
    Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
  2




---



##### 



Delivery of Instrument of Conveyance; Possession
  3




---



##### 



Security Interest
 Buyers Inspection
 Sellers Title
 Maintenance of Natural Gas Lateral Line
  4




---



##### 



Buyers Right to Use the Natural Gas Lateral
 Damage to Natural Gas Lateral Caused by Third Party
  5




---



##### 



Calibration/Adjustment of Measurement Equipment
 Taxes and Transfer Stamps
   Representations, Warranties, and Covenants
     6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



Adequate Assurance
 Default
    11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



Notice and Right to Cure
 Attorneys Fees and Costs
 Waiver of Default
  13




---



##### 



Entire Agreement
 Assignment by Buyer
 Binding Effect
  14




---



##### 



Addresses
 Seller:
    
    Ameren Energy Generating Company
One Ameren Plaza
1901 Chouteau Avenue
P.O. Box 66149, MC 427
St. Louis, MO 63166-6149Buyer:
    
    One Earth Energy LLC
202 North Jordan Drive
Gibson City, IL 60936Lender:
    
    First National Bank of Omaha
1620 Dodge St. Stop 1050
Omaha, NE 68197-1050
Attention: Fallon Savage
 Time is of the Essence
 Additional Assurances
 Governing Law
 Counterparts
  15




---



##### 



BUYER
One Earth Energy LLCBy:
    /s/ Steve KellySteve Kelly, Its PresidentSELLER
Ameren Energy Generating CompanyBy:
    /s/ Charles NaslundIts PresidentAttest:
    
    /s/ Ronald S. GieskeAssistant Secretary  16




---



##### 



STATE OF ILLINOIS
    
    
    ))
    
    
    SS:COUNTY OF FORD
    
    
    )
   /s/ Larry Guy BreesNOTARY PUBLIC   STATE OF MISSOURI
    
    
    ))
    
    
    SS:COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS
    
    
    )
 
   Charles Naslund Ronald S. Gieseke Assistant
Secretary Assistant
Secretary Assistant Secretary
  /s/ Carolyn J. ShannonNOTARY PUBLIC Carolyn J. Shannon  Notary PublicNotary Seal, State ofMissouri  St. Louis CountyCommission #08383264My Commission Expires 3/2/2021
   17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 15, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or post                           ( print page 52727)                        comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

                    The agenda will include:                     *Various IRS issues*.                 

Dated: August 29, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-20945 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P