alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Presto Industries, Inc.
                                   Exhibit 11

The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be
exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Third Quarter              First Nine Months
                                                                    ------------------------    -------------------------
                                                                       2002         2001          2002            2001
                                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
<S>                                                                 <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>
Net Earnings (loss)(1)                                              $      893    $    2,137    $     (384)    $    4,766
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========     ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding(2)                            6,841         6,848         6,839          6,862

Common share equivalents relating to stock options when dilutive             1             1             -              1
                                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------     ----------
Adjusted common and common equivalent
   shares for computation(3)                                             6,842         6,849         6,839          6,863
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========     ==========

Net earnings (loss) per share:
     Basic (1 divided by 2)                                         $     0.13    $     0.31    $    (0.06)    $     0.69
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========     ==========
     Diluted (1 divided by 3)                                       $     0.13    $     0.31    $    (0.06)    $     0.69
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========     ==========

</TABLE>
Polymer Research Corporation of America
           Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act-
     Filed as an exhibit to 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2002



         EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polymer Research Corp. of
          America (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
          30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
          date hereof ("Report"), I Carl Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer and
          Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
          1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that to the best of my knowledge:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.


               November  9, 2002              by:   /s/ Carl Horowitz
                                              -----------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.28




Exhibit
10.28

M/I
Homes

Award
Formulas and Performance Goals

Chief
Operating Officer

Effective
January 1, 2005







In
accordance with the terms of the M/I Homes 2004 Executive Officer Compensation
Plan (the “Plan”), the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) shall, for each
Participant, establish the award formulas and performance goals (as those terms
are defined in the Plan) annually to be measured to determine the amount of
bonus awards for each Plan Year. The following are the performance goals and
award formulas for the 2005 Plan Year for the Chief Operating Officer. As stated
in the Plan, the maximum amount that any Executive Officer can receive in one
year is 500% of his 2004 base salary.





	
      I.
	 	
      Actual
      Net Income:
      In the event the actual net income of the Company is at least 75% of
      budgeted net income, the Chief Operating Officer will receive 70% of
      December 31 base salary. A maximum of 219% will be earned at 100% of
      budgeted income achievement; 9% higher than 2004’s achievement.
      

	 	 	 
	
      II.
	 	
      Customer
      Service:
      If 92% of the Company’s homeowners respond “yes” to Question #14 on the
      related questionnaire, the Chief Operating Officer will receive 50% of
      December 31 base salary. A maximum bonus of 73% will be earned at 100%
      customer satisfaction achievement. If the actual net income of the Company
      is less than 50% of budget, a bonus will not be earned for this
      criteria.

	 	 	 
	
      III.
      
	 	
      Return
      on Beginning Equity(“ROE”):
      If the ROE of the Company is 10%, the Chief Operating Officer will receive
      50% of December 31 base salary, with the amount increasing to a maximum of
      73% at a 20% ROE achievement.







2005 cash
bonus is capped at 350% of 12/31/05 base salary.




PAYMENT




The
individual must be employed in this capacity with the Company on the date
bonuses are distributed to receive a bonus. No amounts are considered due or
payable if the employment relationship with the Company is terminated.





ACKNOWLEDGED:





	 	 	 
	
      Name
	 	
      Date
Exhibit
10.1


 


Annual
Incentive Cash Bonus Plan Outline


 


 


The
Annual Incentive Cash Bonus Plan for 2005 is based upon the following metrics
in the percentages indicated:


 


	
  Revenue

  	
   

  	
  50

  	
  %

  
	
  EBITDA

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
  %

  
	
  Operating Income

  	
   

  	
  20

  	
  %

  
	
  Cash

  	
   

  	
  20

  	
  %

  
	
  Management/Board Disc

  	
   

  	
  10

  	
  %

  



 


Bonuses,
if earned, based upon the established targets, would be paid at levels between
a Minimum Performance level and a Maximum Performance level.  Set forth below is the bonus award matrix,
with percentages reflecting a percentage of the executives’ salary:


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  CEO

  	
   

  	
  Senior Execs

  	
   

  	
  Execs

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Minimum

  	
   

  	
  50

  	
  %

  	
  30

  	
  %

  	
  15

  	
  %

  
	
  Target

  	
   

  	
  100

  	
  %

  	
  60

  	
  %

  	
  30

  	
  %

  
	
  Maximum

  	
   

  	
  200

  	
  %

  	
  120

  	
  %

  	
  60

  	
  %
#### In the Matter of Joyce A. Edelman, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

Order, Court of Claims (Adolph C. Orlando, J.), entered February 6, 1989, which denied claimant’s motion to strike defendant’s answer; judgment of the same court, entered on or about March 8, 1989, which dismissed claimant’s action; and order of the same court, entered May 30, 1989, which denied claimant’s motion to renew and reargue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*156We note that at all relevant times, claimant appellant, Joyce A. Edelman, was a member of the Law Assistant’s Association of the City of New York (the Association), which was the collective bargaining representative of the assistants. Acting on behalf of its members, the Association entered into a stipulation with the Chief Administrative Judge which reclassified the job titles and salaries of certain law assistants, including claimant, and provided for a package including retroactive pay, which would be distributed according to a specified formula. Claimant, however, seeks 100% back pay. Claimant had maintained an action for reclassification which was independent of that commenced by the Association. Both the Association and claimant were aggrieved by determinations of the Classification Review Board affirming administrative orders which were adverse to those respective claimants. Prior to the stipulation, the Association, but not claimant, had commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding. Under the terms of an appendix to the stipulation, claimant was permitted to pursue her appeal, despite the stipulation, and any award for back pay resulting therefrom would be reduced by the amount distributed to claimant under the stipulation. The administrative order denying claimant reclassification, which ultimately was resolved in claimant’s favor by virtue of her union membership, by the stipulation entered into by the Association, did not address retroactive pay. Claimant did not pursue the appropriate CPLR article 78 relief; therefore, claimant has no vehicle for relief independent of the stipulation entered into by the Association on behalf of its members. As such, that stipulation is binding on claimant as to all of its terms (see, *e.g., Matter of Rosenberg v Bartlett,*81 AD2d 867).

We have examined claimant’s remaining contentions, and conclude that they do not warrant reversal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.
----

**ANNUAL      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

**Pooling      and Servicing Agreement dated June 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing      Agreement") by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor, LaSalle      Bank National Association, as trustee, paying agent and certificate registrar,      Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as general master servicer, NCB, FSB as NCB master      servicer, National Consumer Cooperative Bank, as co-op special servicer and      LNR      Partners, Inc. as general special servicer (the "Special      Servicer")**

**MSCI      2006 IQ11**

| 1.   | I                have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under                the                Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end                of the                fiscal year 2006 (the “Reporting                Period”)                and the Special Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing                Agreement has been made under my supervision;                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To                the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer                has                fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement                in all                material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
National Presto Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.


Date:  August 11, 2003                           /S/ M.J. Cohen
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 M. J. Cohen,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7048 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7048

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from replacing physician 
 anesthesiologists with certified registered nurse anesthetists under 
 the health care system of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

Mr. David Scott of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Turner, and Mr. Garbarino) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from replacing physician 
 anesthesiologists with certified registered nurse anesthetists under 
 the health care system of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Lifesaving Anesthesia Care 
for Veterans Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICIAN ANESTHESIOLOGISTS UNDER 
              HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not--
            (1) modify the policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
        relating to anesthesia care in a manner that would provide any 
        medical professional other than a physician anesthesiologist 
        with full practice authority for the furnishment of anesthesia 
        care to veterans under the laws administered by the Secretary 
        (including by providing certified registered nurse anesthetists 
        with such full practice authority); or
            (2) finalize, implement, or enforce the provisions relating 
        to anesthesia care of the proposed rule titled ``Advanced 
        Practice Registered Nurses'' and published in the Federal 
        Register on May 25, 2016 (81 Fed. Reg. 33155), or any 
        substantially similar rule.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
to issue any short-term emergency order relating to the safety, care, 
or well-being of veterans during surgical procedures.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7110 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to clarify and expand authorization 

of support for chaplain-led programs for members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mrs. HARTZLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to clarify and expand 

authorization of support for chaplain-led programs for 

members of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help for All 

5 Servicemembers Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7110 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION AND EXPANSION OF AUTHORIZA2 TION OF SUPPORT FOR CHAPLAIN-LED PRO3 GRAMS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

4 FORCES. 

5 Section 1789 of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘chaplain-led programs’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘a chaplain-led program’’; 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘members of the armed 

11 forces’’ and all that follows through ‘‘status and 

12 their immediate family members,’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘a covered individual’’; and 

14 (C) by inserting ‘‘, or to support the resil15 iency, suicide prevention, or holistic wellness of 

16 such covered individual’’ after ‘‘structure’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (b)— 

18 (A) by striking ‘‘members of the armed 

19 forces and their family members’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘a covered individual’’; 

21 (B) by striking ‘‘programs’’ and inserting 

22 ‘‘a program’’; and 

23 (C) by striking ‘‘retreats and conferences’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘a retreat or conference’’; and 

25 (3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 

26 following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7110 IH

1 ‘‘(c) COVERED INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In this sec2 tion, the term ‘covered individual’ means— 

3 ‘‘(1) a member of the armed forces on active 

4 duty; 

5 ‘‘(2) a member of the reserve components in an 

6 active status; or 

7 ‘‘(3) a dependent of an individual described in 

8 subparagraph (A) or (B).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6999 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6999

  To ensure a complete analysis of the potential impacts of rules on 
                            small entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2022

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small 
Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure a complete analysis of the potential impacts of rules on 
                            small entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hearing Small Businesses Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF COVERED AGENCIES UNDER THE REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY 
              ACT.

    Section 609 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``an initial regulatory flexibility analysis 
        which a covered agency is required to conduct by this chapter'' 
        and inserting ``a proposed rule or interim final rule for which 
        a covered agency is required to conduct an initial regulatory 
        flexibility analysis by this chapter''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the United States Fish and Wildlife Service; and
            ``(5) the Internal Revenue Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                             March 31,     March 31,
                                                 1998           1997   

ASSETS
     <S>                                          <C>            <C>
     Rentals receivable under capital lease       $9,150         $9,150
     Cash                                             43             26

                                                  $9,193         $9,176
     

LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

     Liabilities:
          Accounts payable and
            accrued liabilities                   $   13         $   12

     Shareholder's equity:

          Shares of beneficial interest, at
            no par value, 1,510,000 shares
            issued and outstanding                 9,145          9,145
          Income retained in business                 35             19

               Total Shareholders' Equity          9,180          9,164

               Total Liabilities and
                 Shareholders' Equity             $9,193         $9,176
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles McGill, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant argues that the court erred in refusing to give a missing witness charge with respect to Officer Raggi, one of two surveillance officers. The other surveillance officer and the undercover officer who purchased the drugs on two occasions each testified that he knew defendant by name and sight before the drug buys. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the request, based on its *842determination, with which we agree, that the testimony of Officer Raggi would be cumulative *(see, People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126, 132-133; *cf., People v Fields,*76 NY2d 761; *People v Rodriguez,*38 NY2d 95, 101; *People v Ronchi,*154 AD2d 891, 892).

Defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal are lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6922 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6922

  To continue the temporary waiver of interest on State unemployment 
 loans during the pandemic to provide additional relief, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2022

Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Evans, 
and Mr. Pascrell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To continue the temporary waiver of interest on State unemployment 
 loans during the pandemic to provide additional relief, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continued Waiver of Interest on 
State Unemployment Loans during the Pandemic Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INTEREST-FREE LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1202(b)(10)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1322(b)(10)(A)) is amended by striking ``September 6, 2021'' 
and inserting ``September 30, 2022''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Families First 
Coronavirus Response Act (Public Law 116-127).
                                 <all>
```