alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Anthony S. Shalom, Chief Executive Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 30, 2009



/s/ Anthony S. ShalomAnthony S. ShalomChief Executive Officer(Chairman of the Board of Directors)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intcomex, Inc. and will be retained by Intcomex, Inc. and furnished to the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Michael J. Walters; Michael J. Walters :

and Roseanne Walters, husband and : No. 52 C.D. 2019

wife; Mark H. Attix; Frederick John :

Bartek; Charles W. Buttz and Teresa :

C. Buttz, husband and wife; Joellen :

Chadwick; Mary Ellen Christman; :

Brian Colfer and Alicia Colfer, :

husband and wife; David T. :

Councilor and Debra A. Councilor :

f/k/a Debra Litchult, husband and :

wife; David T. Councilor, :

Administrator of the Estate of :

Theodore G. Councilor; Mary :

Alchermes-Dilger, Joseph D. :

Alchermes, and Christopher B. :

Alchermes; Mark E. Elvin and Shauna :

D. Elvin, husband and wife; Susan E. :

Esterhay and Linda M. Smith; Max H. :

Feldman and Kelee A. :

Monahan-Feldman, husband and wife; :

Leo J. Finnegan; Richard E. John and :

Marilyn P. John, husband and wife; :

Marilynn Ann Johnson; Howard A. :

Kellner and Donna M. Kellner, :

husband and wife; Douglas D. Kelly; :

Russell R. Kice; John O. Klinger and :

Brenda Klinger, husband and wife; :

Mountain Home Enterprises LLC; :

Erik Peterson and Gillian Peterson, :

husband and wife; Clarke Reid and :

Joanne Reid, husband and wife; Patricia :

A. Russo; Edward M. Satterthwaite; :

Jacob E. Seip and Phyllis A. Seip, :

husband and wife; Thomas D. Shore; :

Leslie D. Sopko; Stags Leap Properties :
LLC; Elaine J. Vula; William C. Wolfe, :

Appellants :

:

v. :

:

Buck Hill Falls Company; Lot and :

Cottage Owners' Association of Buck :

Hill Falls

O R D E R

NOW, March 3, 2020, having considered Appellants’ application for 

reargument and Appellees’ answers in response thereto, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Portec, Inc.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                       2972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 50392
<PP&E>                                            7960
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   57477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4411
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     57477
<SALES>                                          19261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19302
<CGS>                                            11244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1194
<INCOME-TAX>                                       485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                709
<DISCONTINUED>                                    2811
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
#### AUDUBON INSURANCE COMPANY and Francis X. Elliott, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. R. B. MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 20091.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Oct. 18, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1954.

Bienvenu & Culver, H. F. Foster, III, New Orleans, for appellants.

Bentley G. Byrnes, New Orleans, for appellee.

REGAN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Francis X. Elliott, and his sub-rogee insurer, Audubon Insurance Company, instituted this suit against defendant, R. B. Martin, endeavoring to recover the respective sums of $50 and $526.90, representing property damage incurred on September 19, 1951, at about 1:30 a. m., as the result of an intersectional collision in Pry-tania and Soniat Streets, in the City of New Orleans, between Elliott’s 1950 Hudson Sedan and Martin’s 1942 Hudson automobile.

Defendant answered and admitted the occurrence of the accident, but asserted that the proximate cause thereof was the negligence of Elliott and, in the alternative, pleaded contributory negligence. Defendant then reconvened claiming the sum of $377.81 representing property damage incurred by his automobile.

From a judgment dismissing both the-main and the reconvention al demands,, plaintiffs have prosecuted this appeal. Defendant has neither appealed nor answered the appeal, hence the reconventional demand is not before us.

The record reveals that the accident occurred in the intersection of Prytania and'. Soniat, both of which are paved and two-way streets. Prytania Street is the right-of-way street since traffic moving from Soniat Street into the intersection is controlled by stop signs. The intersection was well lighted and the vision of the drivers-was not obstructed. Elliott’s automobile was-being driven in Prytania Street towards-Audubon Park. Defendant’s automobile-was travelling in Soniat Street towards-the river. He obeyed.the stop sign before entering Prytania Street. The collision occurred in the uptown river portion of the intersection. After the impact defendant’s automobile came to an immediate stop at the situs of the accident. On the other hand, Elliott’s automobile, although he insisted that he was travelling at a speed of only twenty miles per hour, continued on its-course a distance of thirty feet or more,, mounted a curbing, demolished an iron pick*256et fence of a house located in the uptown river corner and severely damaged the concrete steps thereof. The accident occurred, at 1:30 a.m., and the only eye-witnesses. thereto were the operators of the respective vehicles.

The trial judge found as a fact that “both automobiles were approaching the intersection without regard to the other until a collision actually happened, so both were guilty of negligence in not keeping a lookout” and “that plaintiff’s speed was far’ in excess of: twenty miles per hour.”

We have carefully examined the record and are in accord with the factual result reached by the trial judge.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Michaels, by His Proposed Guardian ad Litem, Florence Krusen, Petitioner, v Joseph D’Elia, as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services dated August 26, 1988, made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the Nassau County Department of Social Services dated May 13, 1988, that the petitioner was ineligible for medical assistance.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

On April 29, 1988, Florence Krusen applied for medical assistance on behalf of her father, the petitioner Joseph Michaels. The local agency denied the application for medical assistance since approximately $30,000 from a joint bank account held by the petitioner with his daughter had been transferred to his son, grandchildren, and great grandchildren in 1986 and 1987. At the fair hearing, the petitioner’s daughter testified that the petitioner was the sole depositor of the funds in the account and that he paid her $150 a month in rent. The State Commissioner affirmed the denial of assistance by the local agency, concluding that all the funds were the sole property of the petitioner. We agree, and find that substantial evidence supports the determination that the joint account had been opened in that form merely as a matter of convenience *(see, Brezinski v Brezinski,*94 AD2d 969; *Wacikowski v Wacikowski,*93 AD2d 885). Brown, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EX-34 (f)
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
111 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-4301
USA

Tel: +1 312 486 1000
Fax: +1 312 486 1486
www.deloitte.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (the "Company") complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for transactions Morgan Stanley Mortgage Trust MSM 2006- 3AR, MSM
2006-5AR, MSM 2006-6AR, MSM 2006-7, MSM 2006-8AR and MSM 2006-11 involving
residential mortgage loans (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, excluding the criteria set forth in Items 1122 (d)(1)(ii),
(d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi),
(d)(4xii), (d)(4)(xiii), and (d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are
not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the
Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on
our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform.
Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 12, 2007

Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 6, 2013

p1030

Order 

Clerk

November 6, 2013

146917 

VALERIE ROHDE, Personal Representative

for the Estate of HENRY C. ROHDE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146917

COA: 308773

GOPI NALLANI, M.D., ADVANCED Arenac CC: 11-011675-NH

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, P.C., BRENT J.

RAAP, D.O., BRENT J. RAPP, D.O., P.C.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

STANDISH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. 

d/b/a ST. MARY’S OF MICHIGAN STANDISH

HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

NORTHERN BAY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.,

and DORAISAMY VENKITAPATHY, M.D.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                               June 30      December 31
                                                 2000           1999

ASSETS
     <S>                                          <C>            <C>
     Rentals receivable under capital lease       $9,150         $9,150
     Cash                                             45             44

                                                  $9,195         $9,194


LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

     Liabilities:
          Accounts payable and
            accrued liabilities                   $   16         $   23

     Shareholder's equity:

          Shares of beneficial interest, at
            no par value, 1,510,000 shares
            issued and outstanding                 9,145          9,145
          Income retained in business                 34             26

               Total Shareholders' Equity          9,179          9,171

               Total Liabilities and
                 Shareholders' Equity             $9,195         $9,194


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

     I, Ralph Izzo, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of Public Service Enterprise GroupIncorporated on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated. 

/s/ Ralph Izzo
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, Department of 

the Army; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; U.S. 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-35711 

D.C. No. 6:19-cv-00149-MK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Hamid Michael Hejazi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his employment action alleging discrimination. We have jurisdiction 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 21-35711 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for 

failure to serve the summons and complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

4(m). Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan), 253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001). We 

affirm. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Hejazi’s action 

because Hejazi failed to effect proper service of the summons and complaint after 

being given notice and opportunities and directives to do so and failed to show 

good cause for his failure to serve. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (outlining the 

requirements for proper service and explaining that a district court may dismiss for 

failure to serve after providing notice and absent a showing of good cause for 

failure to serve); In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d at 512-13 (discussing good cause and the 

district court’s broad discretion to dismiss an action). 

AFFIRMED.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141876

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141876 COA: 299060 Oakland CC: 2009-226960-FC DARRIN FREDERICK POYNTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 23, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 700 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.700

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence M. 
                    `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ``LARRY'' WALSH SR. POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lawrence M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited (Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), Benjamin G. Wolff, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) and Timothy P. Leybold, Interim Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                          |  |                                                                                                                       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    BENJAMIN G.
WOLFF                                                                                                  |  | /s/    TIMOTHY P.
LEYBOLD                                                                                             
|Benjamin G. Wolff Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and
President (principal executive officer) |  | Timothy P. Leybold Interim Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial and accounting officer)
|March 21, 2011                                                                                                            |  | March 21, 2011                                                                                                        

A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and will be retained by ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.