alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                            OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

      I, Ralph Izzo, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report
of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.

                              /s/ Ralph Izzo
                            -------------------------------------------------
                              RALPH IZZO
                              Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              May 4, 2007
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 26, 2019
No. 04

- 19

- 00168

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF Y.M.L., A CHILD, From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02836 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R In this accelerated appeal of the February 2 8 , 201 9 or der terminating a ppellant Mom ’s parental rights, we granted Appellant’s first motion for a four

- day extension of time to file Appellant’s brief

. The brief was due on August 23, 2019. After the once

- extended due date, Appellant filed a second motion for a four

- day extension of time to file the brie f until August 27, 2019. A ppellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant Mom ’s brief is d ue on August 2 7 , 2019

. Any further motion for extension of time to file the brief is discouraged. S ee T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2 (directing courts of appeals to dispose of parental rights termination suits “[w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed”).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 52351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-68-001]


NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation v. ISO New England, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing

September 2, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 7, 2008, NSTAR Electric & Gas 
Corporation filed on behalf of itself and Exelon New Boston, LLC, a 
revised explanatory statement and offer of settlement in compliance 
with the Commission's directive that the standard of review under 
Section 6.4 of the Settlement be amended with regard to non-settling 
third parties.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4e2e1f6e7ebcac8cdcac1f7d1d4d4cbd6d0e4c2c1d6c78ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bcdced9c8c4e5e7e2e5eed8fefbfbe4f9ffcbedeef9e8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll-free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 8, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20806 Filed 9-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### GAUTREAUX v. LANDRY et al.

No. 3053.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1948.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 1949.

Taylor Porter Brooks & Fuller, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Porte.ous & Johnson, of New Orleans, and A. L. Talbot, of Napoleonville, for ap-pellee.

ELLIS, Judge.

As stated in the suit of Oncale v. Landry, 37 So.2d 395, this is a suit by Mrs. Alcee J. Gautreaux against the same defendants in which. she seeks to recover $23,350 for loss of love, companionship, and affection, future support and funeral expenses for the death of her son, Alcee Gautreaux, who was killed as a result of the automobile collision which has been fully discussed in the above referred to case. This amount also includes a claim of $500, the value of the Austin car which was destroyed.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants, in-sólido, in the sum of $10,000.00, together with legal interest from date of judicial demand until paid and for all costs. The defendants have appealed from this adverse *406judgment and plaintiff has answered the appeal and prayed that the judgment he affirmed on the merits but amended so as to be increased to the sum of $15,000.

For the reasons stated in the suit of George T. Oncale against the same defendants, we are of the opinion that the negligence of the defendant Ulysee Landry was the proximate cause of the accident and that Alcee Gautreaux was free of any negligence, and, therefore, both defendants are liable to the plaintiff in this case.

As found by the District Judge, the plaintiff has failed to‘ prove the value of the Austin automobile. However, the record reveals that the deceased son contributed to his mother’s support approximately the sum of $50 per month. She was, at the time of his death, approximately 57 years of age. Alcee Gautreaux, her son, was unmarried and lived with her and, from the record, was evidently a young man of good character and attentive to his mother and would take her to church, picture shows and in the car with him. While the record reveals that she had a small grocery store, it also shows that the stock of merchandise amounted to approximately only $200. According to the record, the deceased was practically, if not entirely, her sole support other than this small business.

Plaintiff has proven funeral expenses of $350 and is entitled to judgment in that amount.

We are of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be reduced. Taking into consideration the facts in this case and the decreased value of the American dollar, we feel that an award to the plaintiff, Mrs. Alcee J. Gautreaux, for loss of love, companionship, affection and support in the sum of $8500 would be proper, with an additional amount of $350 as Funeral expenses.

It is accordingly ordered that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the two named defendants, insólido, in the sum of $8,850 together with legal interest from judicial demand and all costs in both courts.

As thus amended, the judgment of the District Court is hereby affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40710 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-44-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Martinez-Sanchez appeals from his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States after his deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Martinez-Sanchez argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to simple illegal reentry under § 1326(a) and (b) and that he could not be sentenced under § 1326(b)(2) because the indictment failed to allege that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction. His argument is foreclosedNo. 97-40710 -2- by this court’s opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Citizens Communications Company:


We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statement
No. 333-91054 on Form S-8 of Citizens Communications Company of our report dated
June 26, 2002, relating to the statement of net assets available for benefits of
the Frontier  Union 401(k) Savings Plan as of December 31, 2001, and the related
statement  of changes in net assets  available  for benefits for the period from
June 29, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2001, and supplemental  schedule as of
December 31, 2001, which report appears in the annual report on Form 11-K of the
Frontier Union 401(k) Savings Plan dated December 31, 2001.



                                               /s/ KPMG



New York, New York
June 26, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 26, 2012 

h0319 

Order 

 

March 26, 2012 

144205 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144205 

 COA: 305942 

KATHRYN ELIZABETH HAVENAAR, Cass CC: 10-010189-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 8(a)


December 16, 1996


Citicorp
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY  10043

Citicorp Capital I
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10043

         Re:      Citicorp Capital I Preferred Securities
                  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-14917)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Corporate Tax Division of Citibank,  N.A. has been  requested by Citicorp to
render  federal tax advice in connection  with the issuance of Citicorp  Capital
I's  Preferred  Securities,  pursuant  to a  Prospectus,  as  supplemented  by a
Prospectus  Supplement  (collectively,  the "Prospectus"),  substantially in the
form  filed  as  part  of  the  above-referenced   registration  statement  (the
"Registration Statement").

I have reviewed the  statements  set forth in the  Prospectus  under the heading
"United  States  Federal  Income  Taxation"  and  hereby  advise  you that  such
statements,  insofar as they are or refer to  statements of United States law or
legal conclusions  relating  thereto,  are accurate and complete in all material
respects.

I hereby  consent  to the use and  filing of this  opinion  as an exhibit to the
Registration  Statement and to the  reference to this opinion in the  Prospectus
and any other prospectus filed in connection with the Registration Statement. In
giving such  consent,  I do not thereby admit that I come within the category of
persons whose consent is required  under Section 7 of the  Securities Act or the
rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

Very truly yours,

/s/ E. Noel Harwerth

E. Noel Harwerth
Chief Tax Officer
Citibank, N.A.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6630 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6630

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2022

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, as the ``PFC Jang Ho 
                      Kim Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PFC JANG HO KIM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``PFC Jang Ho Kim Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``PFC Jang 
Ho Kim Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Kevin F. McCumber,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
   BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF
   PORTSMOUTH SQUARE, INC. SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-QSB REPORT FOR THE
   QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
   BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK> 0000079661
<NAME> PORTSMOUTH SQUARE, INC.

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        329475
<SECURITIES>                                 8382772
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8753424
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12485532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5305859
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     2092300
<OTHER-SE>                                   5087373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12485532
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1709562
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              190961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1518601
<INCOME-TAX>                                  569699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           948902
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  948902
<EPS-BASIC>                                   1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.29




</TABLE>
#### Ernest J. OLIVIER et ux. v. Roy Stanley BALDWIN et al.

No. 3342.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1950.

Plauche & Plauche, Lake Charles, for appellants. ■ ,

• Joe J. Tritico, Lake Charles, .for appel-lees. '

PER CURIAM.

' A devolutive appeal was taken in this case by Roy Stanley Baldwin on Dec. 13,’ 1950, same having been perfected and filed in this Court on Dec. 14, 1950.

Qn that day, Dec, 14th, the case was submitted to this Court at its Session in Lake. Charles, by joint agreement of. Counsel, on the argument, briefs and -same record as, made up on a previous appeal taken by the, Northwest -Casualty Company, which was decided ,by-this Court-on Nov. 22, 1950, 48 So.2d 806,

*363For the reasons assigned in the previous appeal, being No. 3299 of the Docket of this Court, the judgment of the District Court is hereby reversed and the plaintiffs’ suit dismissed at their cost.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED STATMENTS
OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS, AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1206658
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       5406
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          358524
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         17777
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   28743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1617108
<COMMON>                                        165307
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             423707
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  589014
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            462400
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 700
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   44675
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  520319
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1617108
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       306966
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             18977
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      249249
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      268226
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          38740
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 416
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   39156
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          8732
<NET-INCOME>                                     30424
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    30424
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         32015
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         7777
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           22797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                            39
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                   9150
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9189
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  9189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             20
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                        9145
<OTHER-SE>                        24
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    9189
<SALES>                          686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 686
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  65
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              621
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                     621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .41
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 17, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00495

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.D., a child,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01641

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge P residing



### ORDER

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s

brief is due on September 18, 2014

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court