alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 91

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect

the rights of crime victims.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 2002

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. BARCIA, Mr. KELLER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GREEN

of Wisconsin, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. GALLEGLY, and Ms. PRYCE of

Ohio) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to protect the rights of crime victims.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJRES 91 IH

1 States, and which shall take effect on the 180th day after

2 ratification of this article:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The rights of victims of violent crime,

5 being capable of protection without denying the constitu6 tional rights of those accused of victimizing them, are

7 hereby established and shall not be denied by any State

8 or the United States and may be restricted only as pro9 vided in this article.

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. A victim of violent crime shall have the

11 right to reasonable and timely notice of any public pro12 ceeding involving the crime and of any release or escape

13 of the accused; the rights not to be excluded from such

14 public proceeding and reasonably to be heard at public re15 lease, plea, sentencing, reprieve, and pardon proceedings;

16 and the right to adjudicative decisions that duly consider

17 the victim’s safety, interest in avoiding unreasonable

18 delay, and just and timely claims to restitution from the

19 offender. These rights shall not be restricted except when

20 and to the degree dictated by a substantial interest in pub21 lic safety or the administration of criminal justice, or by

22 compelling necessity.

23 ‘‘SECTION 3. Nothing in this article shall be con24 strued to provide grounds for a new trial or to authorize

25 any claim for damages. Only the victim or the victim’s
3

•HJRES 91 IH

1 lawful representative may assert the rights established by

2 this article, and no person accused of the crime may obtain

3 any form of relief hereunder.

4 ‘‘SECTION 4. Congress shall have power to enforce

5 by appropriate legislation the provisions of this article.

6 Nothing in this article shall affect the President’s author7 ity to grant reprieves or pardons.

8 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall be inoperative unless

9 it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Con10 stitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

11 States within seven years from the date of its submission

12 to the States by the Congress.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2519

DALILA ARZATE MENDOZA; L.A.U.A.,

 Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 18, 2019 Decided: June 27, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devon R. Senges, DUMMIT FRADIN, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Petitioner. 

Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, 

Joseph A. O’Connell, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C. for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Dalila Arzate Mendoza and her minor child, both natives and citizens of Mexico, 

petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing 

Mendoza’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her request for withholding of 

removal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Mendoza’s

merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does 

not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative agency’s factual findings, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s 

decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Arzate Mendoza (B.I.A. Nov. 29, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alonza Hopkins, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered February 25, 1986, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in denying his application for youthful offender status *(see, People v Lee,*154 AD2d 399), as he committed a violent, senseless crime which caused near fatal, permanent injuries to the complainant who made no attempt to resist the defendant’s attempted robbery of a jewelry store *(see, People v Lutchmidat,*134 AD2d 286; *People v Gasbarro,*114 AD2d 594, *affd*67 NY2d 1002). Furthermore, the legally permissible maximum sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80) and was agreed upon as part of the defendant’s guilty plea *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7017 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7017

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd, in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

   Mr. Carter of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3901 MacArthur Blvd, in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Dr. Rudy 
                         Lombard Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. RUDY LOMBARD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3901 MacArthur Blvd, in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dr. Rudy Lombard Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Rudy 
Lombard Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 25, 2011

y0418 

# Order

April 25, 2011

142275

GRADY HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142275 COA: 291714 Wayne CC: 07-724008-NM GERALD M. LORENCE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 23, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Indian Affairs published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 13, 2008, concerning the amended Metlakatla Indian Community Alcohol Possession Code. The document included a section deleted in the original.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This correction is effective as of September 10, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Colliflower, Office of Tribal                               ( print page 52673)                            Services, 1849 C Street, NW., Mail Stop 4513-MIB, Washington, DC 20240; Telephone (202) 513-7640; Fax (202) 208-5113.                     

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 13, 2008, in FR Doc. E8-18771, on page 47211, in the second column, delete in its entirety:                    

Section One.1.56 Liquour Violation. 

Any person who shall, within the Annette Islands Reserve sell, barter, transport, possess, consume, or have consumed, or manufacture any alcoholic beverage shall be guilty of an offense and, upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to labor for a period of not more than six (6) months or to pay a fine not to exceed the constitutional limit, or both, with costs.

Dated: September 2, 2008. 

George T. Skibine, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Economic Development.

[FR Doc. E8-20951 Filed 9-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 119 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 119

  Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission 
under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, relating to prohibited 
                      and excessive contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2002

 Mr. Shays (for himself and Mr. Meehan) introduced the following joint 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission 
under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, relating to prohibited 
                      and excessive contributions.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,  That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission relating to 
Prohibited and Excessive Contributions: Non-Federal Funds or Soft 
Money, published at 67 Fed. Reg. 49063 (2002), and such rule shall have 
no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 700 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 471
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 700

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 4, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ``LARRY'' WALSH SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lawrence M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 471

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 700

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 4, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6933

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, a/k/a Q Ili-Yaas 

Haakeem Farrakhan-Muhammad,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, 

Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)

Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Steven 

Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Candace Haley Bunn, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for 

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr00020-2 (S.D.W. Va. May 22, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52065-52066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20879]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 8-08]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, at 10:30 a.m.

SUBJECT MATTER: Issuance of Proposed Decisions, Amended Proposed 
Decisions, and Orders in claims against Albania.

STATUS: Open.

[[Page 52066]]

    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. E8-20879 Filed 9-4-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence A.
Schiffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer                                     August 6, 2008
---------------------------------
Laurence A. Schiffer
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup 
Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 20th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: September 5, 2008, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern]

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest 
to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on how health information technology can provide the data needed for 
the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and 
others in the health care industry, automate the measurement and 
reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality 
measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can 
improve performance on those quality measures.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: August 16, 2008.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. E8-20330 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
Order entered December 9 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 16
- 01390
- CV
IN RE SUGAR RAY FRAN KLIN, Rela t or Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District C ourt Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11
- 55114
- T 

### O RDER Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s November 28, 2016 “application for writ of mandamus.”

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2022

No. 04-21-00588-CR

Thomas Peter CORTEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR9005

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due on April 8, 2022 and was not filed. On April 12, 2022, 

appellant’s appointed counsel, Richard E. Langlois, filed a motion in this court requesting to 

withdraw as appellate counsel for medical reasons. After consideration, we GRANT counsel’s 

motion. Because appellant is indigent, new appellate counsel must be appointed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal ABATED and REMANDED to the trial court for 

appointment of new appellate counsel by April 28, 2022. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 

40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court can 

assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). We further ORDER the trial court clerk to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order appointing new appellate 

counsel in this court by May 13, 2022. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norverto Rivera, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered August 17, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Although the prosecution’s witnesses, some of whom had criminal records and were involved with illegal drugs, gave accounts that differed with the defense version of how the defendant’s confession was obtained, the jury’s determination to credit the version proffered by the prosecution finds support in the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88), and we decline to disturb it.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.