51312 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices 

ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN 1

Center/form/respondent type Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Hours per 

response 

Total hour 

burden 

Added 

burden 

proportion 2

Total annual 

burden hours 

Total hour 

cost/ 

respondent 3

CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs 

Clients: 

Adolescents .............................. 3,900 ............ 4 ................... 15,600 .35 5,460 .37 2,020 $10,403 

Adults ........................................ 81,333 .......... 3 ................... 243,999 .35 85,400 .37 31,598 162,730 

SBIRT 4 Screening Only .................. 150,618 ........ 1 ................... 150,618 .13 19,580 0 0 ......................

SBIRT Brief Intervention .................. 27,679 .......... 3 ................... 83,037 .20 16,607 0 0 ......................

SBIRT Brief Tx & Refer to Tx .......... 9,200 ............ 3 ................... 27,600 .35 9,660 .37 3,574 18,406 

SBIRT Client Subtotal ............... 187,497 ........ ...................... 261,255 ...................... 45,847 ...................... 3,574 18,406 

Client Subtotal .......................... 272,730 ........ ...................... 520,854 ...................... 136,707 ...................... 37,192 191,539 

SBIRT 

Data Extract by Grants: 5

Adult Records ........................... 400 grants .... 70 × 3 ........... 210 .18 38 ...................... 38 570 

Adolescent Records .................. 73 grants ...... 53 × 4 ........... 212 .18 38 ...................... 38 570 

Screening Only ......................... 7 grants ........ 21,517 × 1 .... 21,517 .07 1,506 ...................... 1,506 22,590 

Brief Intervention ....................... 7 grants ........ 3,954 × 3 ...... 11,862 .10 1,186 ...................... 1,186 17,790 

Brief Tx & Refer to Tx .............. 7 grants ........ 1,314 × 3 ...... 3,942 .18 710 ...................... 710 10,650 

SBIRT Data Extract Subtotal.494 ............... ...................... 37,743 ...................... ...................... ...................... 3,402 52,170 

Upload 6 ............................................ 5 grants ........ ...................... 171,639 ( 8 ) 29 ...................... 29 435 

SBIRT Upload Subtotal ............ 5 grants ........ ...................... 171,639 ...................... ...................... ...................... 29 435 

SBIRT Extract/Upload Subtotal 499 ............... ...................... 209,382 ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ......................

ATR 

Data Extract: 4

Adult Records ........................... 53,333 .......... 3 ................... 160,000 .16 25,600 ...................... 25,600 640,000 

ATR Data Extract Subtotal 53,333 .......... ...................... 160,000 ...................... ...................... ...................... 25,600 640,000 

Upload 7 ............................................ 24 grants ...... 3 ................... 160,000 ( 8 ) 27 ...................... 27 675 

ATR Upload Subtotal ................ 24 grants ...... ...................... 160,000 ...................... ...................... ...................... 27 675 

ATR Extract/Upload Subtotal .... 53,357 .......... ...................... 320,000 ...................... ...................... ...................... 25,627 640,675 

Total ................................... 273,229 ........ ...................... 1,050,236 ...................... ...................... ...................... 45,530 883,680 

Notes: 

1This table represents the maximum additional burden if adult respondents, for the discretionary services programs including ATR, provide three sets of responses/ 

data and if CSAT adolescent respondents provide four sets of responses/data. 2Added burden proportion is an adjustment reflecting customary and usual business practices programs engage in (e.g., they already collect the data items). 3Estimate based on $5.15 for program staff, $15 for IT staff, and $25 for more senior IT staff for ATR uploads. 

4Screening, Brief Intervention, Treatment and Referral (SBIRT) grant program: 

* 150,618 Screening Only (SO) respondents complete section A of the GPRA instrument, all of these items are asked during a customary and usual intake process 

resulting in zero burden; and 

* 27,679 Brief Intervention (BI) respondents complete sections A & B of the GPRA instrument, all of these items are asked during a customary and usual intake 

process resulting in zero burden; and 

* 9,200 Brief Treatment (BT) & Referral to Treatment (RT) respondents complete all sections of the GPRA instrument. 

5 Data Extract by Grants: Grant burden for capturing customary and usual data. 

6 Upload: 5 of the 7 SBIRT grants upload data; the other 2 grants conduct direct data entry. 

7 Upload: All 24 ATR grants upload data. 

8 1 hour per 6,000 records. 

The estimates in this table reflect the 

maximum annual burden for currently 

funded discretionary services programs. 

The number of clients/participants 

served in following years is estimated to 

be the same assuming level funding of 

the discretionary programs, resulting in 

the same annual burden estimate for 

those years. 

Send comments to Summer King, 

SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 

Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road, 

Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her a 

copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. 

Written comments should be received 

within 60 days of this notice. 

Dated: August 24, 2008. 

Elaine Parry, 

Acting Director, Office of Program Services. 

[FR Doc. E8–20213 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Post-Contract Award Information 

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement 

Officer, Acquisition Policy and 

Legislation Office, DHS. 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice and request for 

comments: Extension without change of 

a currently approved collection, 1600–

0003. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland 

Security, Office of the Chief 

Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy 

and Legislation Office, will submit the 

following information collection request 

(ICR) to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13 

(as amended), 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

The Office of the Chief Procurement 

Officer is soliciting comments related to 

its request for extension of an existing 

information collection authority for 


erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices 51313 

information collected from contractors 

during the post-contract award phase of 

public contract administration under 

Homeland Security Acquisition 

Regulation (HSAR). 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until November 3, 

2008. This process is conducted in 

accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1. 

ADDRESSES: Comments and questions 

about this Information Collection 

Request should be forwarded to the 

Acquisition Policy and Legislation 

Office, Attn: Patricia Corrigan for the 

Department of Homeland Security, 

Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, 

Room 3114, Washington, DC 20528. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Corrigan, 202–447–5430 (this is 

not a toll free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS), Office of the Chief Procurement 

Officer requests renewal of an existing 

OMB Control Number for information 

requested from contractors as part of 

post-contract award administration by 

DHS acquisition officials. The 

information requested is specific to each 

transaction and is required in order for 

DHS acquisition officials to properly 

assess contractor technical and 

management progress in meeting 

contractual requirements and otherwise 

performing in the Government’s best 

interest. This notice provides a request 

for renewal of OMB Control Number 

1600–0003 previously granted in August 

2005. 

The Office of Management and Budget 

is particularly interested in comments 

regarding: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

Analysis 

Agency: Department of Homeland 

Security, Office of the Chief, 

Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy 

and Legislation Office. 

Title: Post-Contract Award 

Information. 

OMB Number: 1600—0003. 

Frequency: Once. 

Affected Public: Individuals and 

businesses. 

Number of Respondents: 4,061. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 14 

hours. 

Total Burden Hours: 170,562 annual 

burden hours. 

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 

$0.00. 

Total Burden Cost (operating/ 

maintaining): $0.00. 

Richard Mangogna, 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. E8–20177 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

[Docket No. TSA–2005–20118] 

Intent To Request Renewal From OMB 

of One Current Public Collection of 

Information; Maryland Three Airports: 

Enhanced Security Procedures at 

Certain Airports in the Washington, 

DC, Area 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration, DHS. 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) invites public 

comment on one currently approved 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

abstracted below that we will submit to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for renewal in compliance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR 

describes the nature of the information 

collection and its expected burden. This 

collection requires individuals to 

successfully complete a security threat 

assessment in order to operate an 

aircraft to or from one of the three 

Maryland airports that are located 

within the Washington, DC, 

Metropolitan Area Flight Restricted 

Zone (Maryland Three airports), or to 

serve as an airport security coordinator 

at one of these three airports. 

DATES: Send your comments by 

November 3, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed 

or delivered to Joanna Johnson, Office of 

Information Technology, TSA–11 

Transportation Security Administration, 

601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 

22202–4220. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joanna Johnson at the above address, or 

by telephone (571) 227–3651 or 

facsimile (571) 227–3588. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation is 

available at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Therefore, in preparation for OMB 

review and approval of the following 

information collection, TSA is soliciting 

comments to—

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

OMB control number 1652–0029; 

Maryland Three Airports: Enhanced 

Security Procedures at Certain Airports 

in the Washington, DC, Area, 49 CFR 

part 1562. TSA published an interim 

final rule (IFR) on February 10, 2005 (70 

FR 7150), that codified and transferred 

responsibility from the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to TSA for 

ground security requirements and 

procedures at three Maryland airports 

that are located within the Washington, 

DC, Metropolitan Area Flight Restricted 

Zone (Maryland Three Airports), and for 

individuals operating aircraft to or from 

these three airports. The Maryland 

Three airports are College Park Airport 

(CGS), Potomac Airfield (VKX), and 

Washington Executive/Hyde Field 

(W32). The information collected is 

used to determine compliance with 49 

CFR part 1562. 

Part 1562 allows an individual who is 

approved by TSA to operate an aircraft 

to or from one of the Maryland Three 

Airports, or to serve as an airport 

security coordinator in one of these 


erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES