alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                     

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before October 2, 2008. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline. 

*Copies:*                         Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 5th floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     U.S. Small Business Administration Advisory Committee Membership Nominee Information.                 

*Description of Respondents:*                     To collect information for candidates for Advisory Council.                 

*Form Number:*                     SBA Form 898.                 

*Annual Responses:*                     100.                 

*Annual Burden:*                     100.                 

Jacqueline White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. E8-20216 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PrecisionCastparts Corp. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, William D. Larsson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2005                      |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| /s/  William.D. Larsson                     |   |
| William D. Larsson                               |
| Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer |

 

----
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6703 

To require executive agencies to reinstate telework policies that were in 

place on December 31, 2019, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2022 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. BABIN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. HICE of Georgia, and Mr. GOOD of Virginia) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require executive agencies to reinstate telework policies 

that were in place on December 31, 2019, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Return to Work Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REINSTATE PRIOR REMOTE WORK POLICIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each execu8 tive agency shall reinstate the telework policies in use by 

9 such executive agency on December 31, 2019. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6703 IH

1 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Beginning on the 

2 date on which the head of an executive agency reinstates 

3 the telework policies in use by such executive agency on 

4 December 31, 2019, the reinstated telework policy of such 

5 executive agency shall apply in place of any telework provi6 sion of a teleworking, collective bargaining, or other em7 ployment agreement of such executive agency to the extent 

8 that such telework provision conflicts with, or applies a 

9 different telework policy than, the reinstated telework pol10 icy of such executive agency. 

11 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 (1) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

13 agency’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

14 105 of title 5, United States Code. 

15 (2) REINSTATED TELEWORK POLICY.—The 

16 term ‘‘reinstated telework policy’’ means the 

17 telework policies in use by an executive agency on 

18 December 31, 2019. 

19 (3) TELEWORK.—The term ‘‘telework’’ has the 

20 meaning given such term in section 6501 of title 5, 

21 United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Order entered March 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01702-CR

TIMOTHY DECHEY JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F06-38616-W

ORDER

The Court has received the clerk’s record in this case. The record reflects that although 

appellant was represented by court-appointed counsel during the adjudication proceedings, 

counsel has not been appointed to represent appellant on appeal. The reporter’s record is 

overdue, and the court reporter has informed the Court that no request was made for the record. 

Finally, we note that none of the boxes is marked on the trial court’s certification of appellant’s 

right to appeal.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding 

whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, 

indigence, or for any other reason.
• The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

• If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

• The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order. We further ORDER that the supplemental record contain a 

completed certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court 

proceedings.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE> 1

                     [Letterhead of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1



                          Independent Auditors' Report
                          


The Board of Directors
Payless Cashways, Inc.:


We have reviewed the accompanying  condensed balance sheets of Payless Cashways,
Inc.   as   of  May 30, 1998  and   May 31, 1997  and  the   related   condensed
statements  of  operations  and cash flows for the thirteen and  twenty-six week
periods   then   ended.    These   condensed   financial   statements   are  the
responsibility  of the Company's management.

We  conducted  our  reviews in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A  review  of  interim
financial  information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial  data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the  expression  of an opinion  regarding the  financial  statements  taken as a
whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying condensed  financial statements for  them to  be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the balance sheet of Payless Cashways,  Inc. as of November 29, 1997
and the related  statements of operations,  shareholders'  equity and cash flows
for the fiscal year then ended (not presented  herein);  and in our report dated
January  19,  1998,  we  expressed  an  unqualified  opinion on those  financial
statements. As discussed in note A to the financial statements, the November 29,
1997  balance sheet  reflects the  application  of fresh-start  reporting  as of
that date and, therefore, is not comparable  in  all  respects  to  the  balance
sheets  of  the  Company  prior  to   November 29, 1997.   In  our  opinion, the
information   set forth   in  the  accompanying  condensed  balance  sheet as of
November  29, 1997 is fairly presented,  in all material respects,  in  relation
to  the  balance sheet  from which it has been derived.     


s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
June 16, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20046]



[[Page 50958]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP08-426-000; RP08-426-001]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

August 22, 2008.
    On June 30, 2008, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) filed 
revised tariff sheets pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act and 
Part 154 of the Commission's regulations. In its filing, El Paso 
proposes a number of new services, a rate increase for existing 
services, and changes in certain terms and conditions of service. On 
August 5, 2008, the Commission issued an order \1\ accepting and 
suspending the tariff sheets, subject to refund and conditions, 
establishing hearing procedures, and establishing a technical 
conference. In that order, the Commission directed the Staff to convene 
a technical conference to address the proposed services and terms and 
conditions reflected in El Paso's filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 124 FERC ] 61,124 (2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that a technical conference to discuss issues raised by 
El Paso's filing will be held on Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 9 a.m. 
(EST) and Friday, September 12, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST), in a room to be 
designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. If necessary, the 
conference will continue on Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST) 
and Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 9 a.m. (EST).
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a2a0a0a6b0b0aaa1aaafaab7ba83a5a6b1a0eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="244547474157574d464d484d505d64424156470a434b52">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    All parties and staff are permitted to attend. For further 
information please contact April Ballou at (202) 502-6537 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e2d3d1cacf8de1c2cfcfccd6e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="175667657e7b3955767b7b7862577172657439707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20046 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Proclamation 8278 of August 22, 2008

# Women’s Equality Day, 2008

With vision and determination, American women have helped build our great Nation.  On Women's Equality Day, we remember the dedication of women who overcame many obstacles in order to secure the right to vote.

The struggle for women's rights is a story of strong women willing to take the lead and pave the way toward equal voting rights for all American citizens.  In 1848, a group of determined women came together in Seneca Falls, New York, to proclaim that “all men and women are created equal,” and demand suffrage.  On August 26, 1920, their voices were finally heard, and the 19th Amendment to the Constitution guaranteed women the right to vote.

As we look back on the journey to women gaining suffrage, we remember the sacrifices of people like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton.  More than 160 years after the Seneca Falls Convention, we celebrate the spirit, leadership, and hard work of those pioneering women.  We also recognize the women who continue in this tradition by acting as role models in their communities, helping raise the next generation of Americans, leading in their professions, and serving in the Armed Forces protecting our country.  These women are continuing on the path set by those who came before them, so that all Americans can realize the great promise of our Nation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby  proclaim August 26, 2008, as Women's Equality Day.  I call upon the people of the United States to celebrate the achievements of women and observe this day with appropriate programs and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.



[FR Doc. E8-20079 Billing code 3195-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32(b)**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Richard L. Travis, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”), certify,that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:
(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.      /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.       Richard L. Travis, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer   Date: May 16, 2005  
*The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.*
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. ANTHONY MICHAEL COLELLA, JR. , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 22

- 0091 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201801921 The Honorable Derek C. Carlis le , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL
Mohave County Attorney ’ s Office , Kingman By Matthew J. Smith Counsel for Respondent Anthony Michael Colella, Jr. , Buckeye Petitioner FILED 2-28-2023STATE v. C OLELLA Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey , Judge Jennifer B. Campbell , and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Anthony Michael Colella, Jr. seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s fifth successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DAVID DEAN,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

AND

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Intervenor.

______________________ 

2014-3026

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. AT-3330-12-0696-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 The respondent and intervenor move for extensions of 

time to file their briefs. 

Upon consideration thereof,

Case: 14-3026 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 01/17/2014
2 DEAN v. MSPB

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motions are granted. The briefs are due no later 

than February 10, 2014.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s27

Case: 14-3026 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 01/17/2014
Exhibit
10.17




LOAN
AGREEMENT
 July 17,
2008
 
 Richard N. Jeffs (the
“Lender”) of Flat 1, 49 Pont Street, London, SW1X 0DB, advanced US$200,000 (the “Principal
Sum”) to Red Lake Exploration, Inc. (the “Borrower”) of 10168 Lawson Drive,
Richmond, British Columbia, V7E 5M3.  The Lender advanced the funds on
July 17, 2008.
  The
Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest
calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 8% per year (the “Interest”)
from July 17, 2008..  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the
Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in
trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.
  The
Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the
Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
  LENDER
                      
                      
                      BORROWERRichard N.
      Jeffs
                      
                      
                      Red Metal Resources
      Ltd.Per:
                      
                      
                      Per:/s/
      Richard N. Jeffs
                      
                      
                      /s/
      Caitlin JeffsRichard
      N. Jeffs
                      
                      
                      Authorized
      Signatory
 
 1
  PROMISSORY
NOTE
  Principal
      Amount:  US$200,000
              July 17,
      2008
  For value
received, Red Lake Exploration, Inc. (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand
to the order of Richard N. Jeffs(the “Lender”) the sum
of $200,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”)
together with interest on the Principal Sum from July 17, 2008 (“Effective
Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate
as defined below.
 
 For the
purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 8 per cent per
year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded
monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective
rate of 8.3% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the
Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
 
 The
Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any
time.
 
 The
Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour
of this promissory note.
 
 BORROWERRed
      Metal Resources Ltd.Per:/s/
      Caitlin JeffsAuthorized Signatory
  2