alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                               Pinkerton's, Inc.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)

                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 MARCH 21, 1997   MARCH 22, 1996
                                                 --------------   --------------
 
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>       
Net income                                            $1,981           $1,709    
                                                      ======           ======    
                                                                                 
Weighted average number of common shares                                         
  outstanding                                          8,363            8,346    
                                                                                 
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock                     259               62    
  options                                             ------           ------    
                                                                                 
Weighted average number of common shares, as                                     
  adjusted, for calculation of earnings per share      8,622            8,408    
                                                      ======           ======    
                                                                                 
Net income per common share                           $  .23           $  .20    
                                                      ======           ======    
 
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51309-51310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant

[[Page 51310]]

applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review 
Group, NST-1 Subcommittee.
    Date: September 8-9, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The M Street Renaissance Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Raul A. Saavedra, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC; 6001 Executive Blvd., Ste. 3208, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9529, 301-496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc8f9d9d8a99988e8ebc929592988fd2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="631002021506071111230d0a0d07104d0d0a0b4d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: August 25, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20183 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 33-59791


                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $7,000,000,000
                    Global Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series C
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                   Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series C
                  Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing Supplement,  dated  February 20, 1996
     (To Prospectus Supplement, dated August 7, 1995;
     to Prospectus, dated August 7, 1995)

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The terms of the Subordinated  Notes set forth in this Pricing  Supplement
supplement  and modify,  to the extent  applicable,  the  description of general
terms and provisions of Citicorp's Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series
C,  set  forth  in  the  accompanying   Prospectus  and  Prospectus  Supplement.
Capitalized  terms not defined  herein shall have the meanings  assigned to such
terms in the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

      Interest  rates  offered by Citicorp  with respect to the Notes may differ
depending  upon,  among other things,  the aggregate  principal  amount of Notes
purchased in any single transaction.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:               7.00% Subordinated Fixed-Rate Notes Due
                              March 15, 2016 (the "Notes").
Aggregate
Principal Amount:             $25,000,000.00.

Price to Public:              Offered at varying prices related to prevailing
                              market prices.

Issue Date:                   February 28, 1996.

Stated Maturity:              March 15, 2016.

Interest Rate:                7.00% per annum.

Interest Payment Dates:       Monthly on the 15th day of each month, commencing
                              March 15, 1996, and at Stated Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:         The first day of the month in which each Interest
                              Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:                 None.

Redemption:                   The Notes are subject to redemption,  in whole but
                              not in part,  at the  option of  Citicorp,  on not
                              more than 60 or less than 30 days' notice,  on any
                              Interest   Payment  Date  occurring  in  March  or
                              September  on  or  after  March  15,  2000,  at  a
                              redemption price of 100% of their principal amount
                              plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption
                              date.

Selling Agent:                Merrill Lynch & Co., as Principal.

Agent's Discount
 or Commission:               2.250%.

Minimum Denomination:         $1,000.

CUSIP Number:                 17303 MEU 9.
EXHIBIT 15
                  Letter from Independent Accountants Regarding
                     Unaudited Interim Financial Information



April 10, 2000
Photo Control Corporation
Minneapolis, Minnesota



We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim financial
information of Photo Control Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2000 as
indicated in our report dated April 10, 2000; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No.2-85849 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP

Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota


                                       11
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 88 2 . REEVES v . THE STATE.

On M arch 2 8 , 2 0 1 9 , t h i s Co u rt gran t ed M al co l m J am al Reev es ’ s ap p l i cat i on s fo r d is cret i o n ary ap p eal o f th e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd er rev o k in g h i s p ro b at i o n

. Th ereaft er, Reev es fi l ed a ti m el y n o ti ce o f ap p eal

. Aft er carefu l rev iew o f t h e reco rd i n t h i s cas e,

we co n cl u d e th at th e ap p l i cat i o n s fo r d i s cret i o n a ry ap p eal w ere i m p ro v i d en t l y g ran t ed , an d i t i s o rd ered t h at t hi s ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 28, 2020

01/28/2020
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Bester, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, arguing that the evidence was legally insufficient because the People failed to prove knowledge that the property was stolen. The charges stem from defendant’s sale of a fibergastroscope, a medical instrument, to a pawnbroker for the sum of $20; the owner of the medical instrument testified that it was worth $12,000. The People failed to request, and the court did not charge, the inference of knowledge arising from the recent and exclusive possession of the fruits of a crime, and the jury therefore could not consider this inference in arriving at its verdict *(see, People v Felder,*132 AD2d 705; *People v Hunt,*112 AD2d 781). However, even without the inference, there was sufficient proof that defendant knew the property to be stolen, given that it was a highly sophisticated piece of medical equipment, still in its original plastic wrapping, sold by defendant for a mere $20 the day after it was stolen *(see, People v Day,*132 AD2d 987).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions on appeal and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—criminal possession of stolen property, third degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Den-man, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
NO. 07-06-0092-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 6, 2006

______________________________ THE SCHOOL OFTHE OZARKS, I NC., D/B/A COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS, APPE LLANT V. WILL W . SNEAD ANDRAY A. SN EAD, APPELLEES

_________________________________ FROM THE 6 9TH DIST RICT COURT OF HARTL EY COUNTY; NO. 4289H; HO NORABLE RON ENNS, JUD GE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPIN ION
The School of the O zarks, Inc., d/b/a College of the Ozarks perfecte d this accelerated app eal fro m t he trial cour t’s order de nying i ts special a ppearance. Pendin g before this Court

is an unopposed moti on to dismiss the appeal as moot. Attached to the motion as exhibi ts are a joi nt motion and an ord er signed by the trial court to vac ate the2

appealed order and dis miss wi th prejudice the c l a i m s o f a p p e l l e e s Wi l l W. Snead and Ray A. Snead. We grantthe motion and dis miss the appeal a s moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 1 42.1(a). Having dismissed the appeal at the req uest of all parti es, no motion for r ehearing will b e entertained and o ur mandate wi ll issue fort hwith.
Don H. Reavis Justice
<PAGE> 
                                                                         
                                                                 Exhibit 12 (a)
                             J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                           and Consolidated Subsidiaries
                                          
        Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Combined Fixed Charges
                      and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement







                                                         52 weeks ended     
                                                ________________________________
                                                 Oct. 25                Oct. 26
   ($ Millions)                                    1997                  1996 
                                                _________           ____________

   Income from continuing operations             $     665           $    1,212
      (before income taxes, before
      capitalized interest, but after
      preferred stock dividend)

   Fixed charges

   Interest (including capitalized
   interest) on:

      Operating leases                                  110                 102
      Short term debt                                   122                 101
      Long term debt                                    473                 298
      Capital leases                                      7                   5
      Credit facility                                    19                   -
      Other, net                                        (14)                  4
                                                                               
                                                 ____________        ___________
   Total fixed charges                                  717                 510

   Preferred stock dividend, before taxes                46                  47

   Combined fixed charges and preferred          ____________        ___________
      stock dividend requirement                        763                 557

   Total available income                        $    1,428          $    1,769
                                                ============        ============
   Ratio of available income to combined
      fixed charges and preferred stock
      dividend requirement                              1.9                 3.2
                                                ============        ============



   The interest cost of the LESOP notes guaranteed by the Company is not
   included in fixed charges above.

   The Company believes that, due to the seasonal nature of its business, ratios
   for a period of time other than a 52 week period are inappropriate.
EXHIBIT 10.20


 


OFFICER’S BONUS TERM SHEET


 


All vice presidents of Websense, Inc. not covered by another incentive
compensation program are generally eligible for an annual target bonus of 25%
of their annual salary (“Annual Target”). 
This bonus is based upon the Company achieving a combination of
objective performance goals, including its billings and/or operating profit
objectives, along with any other Company or individual performance goals as may
be determined by the Compensation Committee.


 


Bonuses
are earned and paid quarterly, based on the achievement of quarterly
performance goals.  Each officer’s
quarterly target bonuses generally cumulate to 80% of the Annual Target,
although each quarter’s target bonus may vary as a percentage of the Annual
Target.   At the end of the fiscal year,
an additional target bonus amount generally equal to 20% of the Annual Target
may be earned based on the achievement of annual performance goals.


 


Quarterly
and annual bonuses under the plan, if earned, may range from 50% of the target
bonus amount (based on non-satisfaction of objectives) to a maximum of 150% of
the target bonus amount (based on exceeding objectives).


 


The
Company reserves the right to change the officer bonus terms and/or Term Sheet
from time to time as it feels necessary to accomplish its goals, including as a
result of market conditions, personnel, new or different product offerings
and/or corporate restructuring.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoOum Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2017, I, Terence Byrne , Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2017, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2017, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   November 30, 2017

SoOum Corp.



By:  /s/Terence Byrne





Terence Byrne
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       10,864
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        260
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             829
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         2,724
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,216
<COMMON>                                         3,499
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            1
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              1,012
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   4,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               93
<PREFERRED>                                        277
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             4,314
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      492
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        120
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    60
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   5,347
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   15,215
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,142
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               310
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,052
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,362
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            780
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  35
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     815
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           326
<NET-INCOME>                                       489
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         18
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      471
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           270
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          292
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.13
        

</TABLE>
#### Albert ZUNIGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM; Robert C. Schenck, Jr., Dr.; John C. Sparks, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-51237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 9, 2003.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Albert Zuniga, prisoner # 528311 in the Bexar County Adult Detention Center, has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district court’s denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. By moving for IFP, Zuniga is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. *Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997). The district court noted *294the Zuniga had submitted no medical opinion showing that he would suffer irreparable harm if he were not given orthopedic shoes. Zuniga’s conclusional allegation of irreparable harm is insufficient to show that the district court abused its discretion in denying injunctive relief. Lakedreams *v. Taylor,*932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991).

Zuniga’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). The district court did not err by certifying that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Zuniga’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Zuniga’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Zuniga’s appeal is DISMISSED. *Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

This dismissal of Zuniga’s appeal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Zuniga is warned that should he accumulate three strikes, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will be unable to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

IFP DENIED; APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul M. Hales, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The accomplice’s testimony was sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence that defendant was in front of the store while the burglar alarm was sounding, that he ran to his car and drove off with another person as the police approached, and that he was in possession of the fruits of the burglary when apprehended minutes later *(see,*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Pasciuta,*104 AD2d 1010).

Defendant’s request that we exercise our discretionary power to modify the sentence is devoid of merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Wolfgang, J.—burglary, third degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.