alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6

 

FIRST AMENDMENT OF

PHYSICIANS REALTY TRUST 2013 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Physicians Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), has previously established the Physicians Realty Trust 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Equity Plan”).  The 2013 Equity Plan provides that the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of the Company may at any time amend the 2013 Equity Plan, provided that no amendment for which shareholder approval is required shall be effective unless such amendment shall be approved by the requisite vote of the shareholders of the Company.  The Board has previously delegated its power to amend the 2013 Equity Plan to the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board.  The Committee has determined that it is advisable to amend the 2013 Equity Plan and that such amendment does not require shareholder approval.

 

Therefore, effective July 22, 2013, the 2013 Equity Plan is amended as follows:

 

1.              By substituting the following sentence for the third sentence of Section 6.6(a) of the 2013 Equity Plan:

 

“If the Performance Award is to be in Common Shares, the Performance Award may provide for the issuance of the Common Shares at the time of the grant of the Performance Award or at the time of the certification by the Committee that the Performance Goals for the performance period have been met.”

 

2.              By substituting for the reference to the “Board” in the first sentence of Article 9 of the 2013 Equity Plan a reference to the “Committee.”

 

3.              By deleting and not replacing Article 16 thereof.

 

In all other respects, the 2013 Equity Plan remains unchanged.

 

The foregoing amendment was approved and adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Company on May 6, 2014.

 

	
 
    	
PHYSICIANS REALTY TRUST
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ John T. Thomas
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
John T. Thomas
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Blake, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 10, 2005



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RONALD L. BLAKE                               
|Ronald L. Blake President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: November 11, 2008                         /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
#### STATE ex rel. FLORIDA BAR v. JARVIS.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

July 30, 1954.

Darrey A. Davis, President of the Florida Bar, Miami Beach, for complainant.

Harry M. Jarvis, Orlando, in pro. per.

TERRELL, Justice.

Pursuant to Article XI, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A., a complaint was filed against respondent charging him

with unprofessional conduct as an attorney at law, in that he did on May *6,*1952, accept a cashier’s check in the sum of $3,500 from his client Sidney G. Leslie who purchased it from the Florida National Bank of Orlando, that said check was payable to Mrs. Olive H. Brown, that respondent was expected to deliver said cashier’s check to Mrs. Brown in settlement of a claim but that instead respondent, on May 10, 1952, deposited said check in the First National Bank of Orlando and converted it to his own use.

A referee was appointed, respondent was served with, notice of the complaint, including the time and place of hearing and the charge against him, but he did not appear in person or otherwise to resist the charges. Evidence was taken by the complainant which established conclusively every element of the complaint, that respondent embezzled the proceeds of the said cashier’s check, the same being funds entrusted to him by his client and that he said nothing in defense of the charge.

The referee found respondent guilty of gross professional misconduct and recommended that he be disbarred. The Board of Governors of the Florida Bar approved the report and recommendation of the referee and recommend to this Court that an order be entered disbarring respondent, Harry M. Jarvis, from the practice of law in the State of Florida. All proceedings in the cause have been certified to this Court with recommendation as detailed.

The record, the report, and recommendation of the referee and the Board of Gov*229ernors of the Florida Bar, have been thoroughly examined and reveal conclusively that respondent has been guilty of such conduct as disqualifies him to practice law as pointed out in State of Florida ex rel. Florida Bar v. Murrell, Fla., 74 So.2d 221, is present and proven.

It is accordingly the judgment of this Court that respondent, Harry M. Jarvis, was regularly charged, tried and found guilty of unprofessional conduct as an attorney, that he should be and is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in this State.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, SE-BRING, HOBSON, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the August
30, 1997, financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                           36707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     348780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                460571
<PP&E>                                          719173
<DEPRECIATION>                                (275011)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1243861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           617795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      40600
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                      162088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1243861
<SALES>                                         632107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                633298
<CGS>                                           478038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   478038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (98997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (33595)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (65402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (65402)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6792 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6792

 To prohibit the Secretary of State from issuing a passport, passport 
card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that includes the unspecified 
            (X) gender designation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2022

Mr. Roy (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mrs. Miller of 
Illinois, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Budd, and Mr. Duncan) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of State from issuing a passport, passport 
card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that includes the unspecified 
            (X) gender designation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passport Sanity Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING CERTAIN GENDER DESIGNATION ON PASSPORTS, 
              PASSPORT CARDS, AND CONSULAR REPORTS OF BIRTH ABROAD 
              ISSUED BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of State shall--
            (1) ensure each application for a covered document includes 
        only the gender designations male and female; and
            (2) prohibit the issuing of a covered document that 
        includes the unspecified (X) gender designation.
    (b) Covered Document Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
document'' means a passport, passport card, or Consular Report of Birth 
Abroad issued by the Department of State.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph A. Novaro, Appellant, v Jomar Real Estate Corp. et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered April 26, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiffs motion to the extent of directing an accounting of the affairs of Jomar Real Estate Corp. and NRS Partners and enjoining defendants from paying any dividends or making any distributions except in the ordinary course of business and denied the branch of his motion seeking partial summary judgment on his eighth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff did demonstrate a strong case that the individual defendants had breached the parties’ October 1972 joint venture agreement, requiring equal distribution of the net proceeds of the venture, as well as their February 1983 stipulation of settlement, requiring all distributions to be made on an equal basis and barring payment of any dividend without a like dividend being concurrently paid to every other shareholder. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court properly refused to grant partial summary judgment for a money judgment in the amount of payments made to the individual defendants or for a direction that such payment be made to plaintiff. A judicial accounting is the appropriate mechanism by which such relief is to be obtained as amongst joint venturers *(Hotel Prince George Affiliates v Maroulis,*62 NY2d 1005, *revg*98 AD2d 652, 654-655 *for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Silverman, J.).*Here, the court did direct an accounting and plaintiff was further protected by the grant of injunctive relief. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS** AUSTIN

lionorable Wm. J. i;awson Secretary of stat& **Austin,** Texas Door W. Ubwsonr Attention - opinion 60. oan

, under Artiole

popounbiw fh Gomp8ny may eo aeviasd Civil of your 1etts the Parieian Rar iole 861 of the

that, Wader the opin1, to whfch we heartlright the name of busin, association or union of rporated or unlnoorporaWd,

c offioe of the Seoretary of state by leaving tprafao simile oopUas, with the Secretmy of Stat8, and slid Secretary shall return to such person, association 

### or union so filing the sameI one OP said fat sI.n&lecopies almg with aixiattached to 8 duly attested oertificate of the Piling OP sames for rihichhe shall rooeive a Pee of one dollar. Such certificate of f+ilSng ehall

### ~oaorablsWm. J.Lawson - page 8

in all suit0aacl

prosooutioas

uaiher this ohapterbe suificient proof OS the adopt

### ion of such label, trnde simrk,design, device, 

### imptint or fom of advertisement, and of the right of such persoa, association or union to ailoptthe same. 

### Xo label,trade mark, design, dffioe, 

### inpriat or form of ad

### vortioementshallbe filed a8 

### aforesaid that would probably be mietalcen

for 5 

### label. trnde nark, design, 

### devioe,

## impriator form 0P" 8dv0rtit30ment

already 

### of rsoord. lo person, 

### or &esOCiati.On 

### shall b8 paradtttid t0 

### registeras a label,trademark design,deV&06* fmprint Or fOX'5tOf MhEil't~B-t Pny 

### e&l-, design or rosemblamm theretot&at hire **been** 

### adopt& or used by fbny ohar%table, banerolentor relQ&ous rooietyor association, 

### without their oonsent.@ You were right 

### in yaur rekfarol to 8008pt old file thieappliaationror oopyrl*t ef the mere bueiaew mama or trade-nameOt tke o-pug am suoh. The applieat&on d0Se aOt 001er Aay 

### oopyPigbfablesUb#ot, imItts&=, or wr mif&in the meudng of the statute.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, serving
as its Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: February 27, 2008                         /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Principal Financial Officer)




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40468 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERALD DANIEL BEAUMONT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:90-CR-53-2

- - - - - - - - - - February 20, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerald Daniel Beaumont, federal prisoner No. 03776-035, was convicted and sentenced for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and use of a telephone to facilitate that conspiracy. He appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence from life in prison to 400 months of imprisonment. He contends that the reduction should have been greater and implicitly relies on U.S.S.G. § 2D1.11. He also contends for theNo. 96-40468 - 2 - first time in his reply brief that his sentence would have been less harsh if he had had competent counsel at sentencing. Section 2D1.11(c) specifically excludes from its coverage conspiracy to manufacture drugs, and directs that sentencing for such crimes be governed by § 2D1.1. See United States v. Bellazerius , 24 F.3d 698 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 375 (1994). The district court did not abuse its discretion in using § 2D1.1 rather than § 2D1.11 in determining how much to reduce
Beaumont’s sentence. Regarding Beaumont’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel argument, this court does not address issues raised for the first time in a reply brief. See United States v. Prince , 868 F.2d 1379, 1386 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 932 (1989).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>                     This schedule contains summary financial
                             information extracted from Hondo Oil & Gas
                             Company's Form 10-Q for the period identified
                             below.  This information is qualified in its
                             entirety by reference to such financial
                             statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                                  535
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                           291
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,395
<PP&E>                               36,153
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       40,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                63,302
<BONDS>                              42,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             13,781
<OTHER-SE>                         (102,774)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         40,766
<SALES>                                   4
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         23
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,480
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (8,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (2)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (8,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (8,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.59)
        




















</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          78,762
<SECURITIES>                                       238
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      5,710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,750
<PP&E>                                         179,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 972,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,792
<BONDS>                                        457,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           404
<OTHER-SE>                                     443,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   972,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,487
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,025
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     75
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,690
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>