alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MONIQUE ROBINSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 792 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,226                   4,632
<SECURITIES>                                       896                   1,267
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,554                   2,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,388                  42,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,403                  57,625
<PP&E>                                          14,257                  12,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,873)                 (5,830)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,094                  74,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,333                  11,630
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           268                     258
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,981                  27,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,094                  74,425
<SALES>                                         70,854                  71,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,204                  22,897
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (26,700)                (26,099)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,213)                 (2,237)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,289)                 (4,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                 (1,898)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,289)                 (3,097)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.41)                  (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)                  (0.27)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robert G. Dutcher, Chief
Executive Officer of Possis Medical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.




Date: March 12, 2006                       By: /s/ Robert G. Dutcher
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                 ROBERT G. DUTCHER
                                                 Chairman, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                       26
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lannette Smith, Appellant.

Judgement, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William H. Wallace, III, J.), rendered March 16, 1987, which convicted defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and, upon her plea of guilty, of violation of probation and sentenced her, as a violent predicate felony offender, to concurrent indeterminate terms of from 5 to 10 years’ imprisonment on the robbery and burglary convictions, one year for criminal possession of a weapon and one year for violation of probation, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remanding the matter for a new trial on indictment No. 2991/ 86, and otherwise affirmed.

The defendant and a codefendant, John Washington, were tried together on charges of robbery, burglary and related crimes. After the evidence was heard, but before summations, the trial court replaced one of the jurors, who had failed to report because she had to attend a funeral. This substitution was done without contacting the juror to ascertain her whereabouts and availability. The substitution was made over the objection of both defendant’s and codefendant’s counsel.

*211In *People v Washington*(75 NY2d 740), the Court of Appeals reversed Washington’s conviction for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Justice John Carro (151 AD2d 384, 385) and ordered a new trial. This decision was based on the trial court’s failure to adhere to the proper procedures for discharging a juror. *(See,*CPL 270.35; *People v Page,*72 NY2d 69, 73.) As the People concede, *People v Washington*is dispositive of the same issue raised by the defendant in this appeal, and thus the judgment of conviction must be vacated, and the case remanded for a new trial.

As to defendant’s plea of guilty to violation of probation, it appears she has already served the sentence imposed thereon. However, since such charge was based upon her failure to report and her arrest, indictment and conviction, which is being reversed, in the event defendant is acquitted on her retrial, she should be permitted, if so advised, to withdraw such guilty plea. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 3, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
     1. Cabool State Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan; to acquire an 
additional 2 percent, for a total of 31.39 percent, of the voting 
shares of Cabool Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Cabool State Bank, all of Cabool, Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Andrews Holding Company, Andrews, Texas; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Kent County State Bank, Jayton, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 31, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-2035 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Travelers Insurance Group Inc.
Address:   One Tower Square
           Hartford, Connecticut 06183

Form 13F File Number:              28-4152

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Marla Berman Lewitus
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7338

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Marla Berman Lewitus       New York, New York       August 16, 1999
------------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.43    
    


BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  


        As of March 1, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of EFJ, Inc. has not modified the salaries of any named Executive Officer. The annual
base salaries of Michael E. Jalbert, Massoud Safavi, James Ridgell, Kenneth Wasko, Terry A. Watkins, each of whom were EFJ, Inc. named executive officer for
2004, at the same levels as the 2004 annual base salaries, or $310,000, $211,192, $137,077, 184,904, and $100,324, respectively. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.43
#### BRUNO v. McCABE.

No. 20207.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 8, 1954.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1954.

*246John J. Conners, New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant.

Jacob J. Amato and J. Henry Sciambra, New Orleans,, for defendant an,d appellee.

McBRIDE, Judge.

Under a written lease plaintiff is the lessor and defendant is the lessee of the premises 5507 New Chef Menteur Highway. The lease term is for a period o-f sixty months commencing on the first day of September .1948 and ending on the thirty-first day of August 1953, “with the privilege of the five year renewal.” . The consideration is $175 per month payable in advance.

In this suit the lessor, Bruno,' assails the efficacy of the renewal claiise and seeks a judicial decree declaring that the clause is not binding 'on him. From an adverse judgment he has appealed.

Plaintiff’s complaint is that the renewal clause does not state on what te,rms and conditions the lease can be renewed, and, therefore, is too vague and indefinite to be enforced by defendant.

The contention is without merit. The clause as written means and can only mean one thing, and that is that it was the intention of the contracting parties that at-the' end of the original term the defendant would have the right to renew the lease, if he so desired, for an additional period of five years upon the same terms and conditions.

A contract should not be interpreted-as to defeat the main purpose indicated by its provisions nor to impute to the parties the use of language without meaning or effect. Lower Terrebonne Refining & Mfg. Co. v. Barrow, 126 La. 263, 52 So. 487.

The lease was prepared by the attorney for plaintiff, and under a cardinal rule of construction of contracts'; where there is a dispute over what are the provisions or what the stipulations mean, a document must be interpreted against the one who had prepared it, 6 R.C.L. 854, par. 242; Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 193 La. 605, 192 So. 72, 125 A.L.R. 1075; Meyer v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co., 16 La.App. 472, 133 So. 504; Godchaux v. Iberia-Vermilion R. Co., 132 La. 77, 60 So. 1027, 1028; Jurgens v. Warmoth, 160 La. 475, 107 So. 311; Bernier v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co., 173 La. 1078, 139 So. 629, 88 A.L.R. 765; Ventre v. Lastrapes, 9 La.App. 239, 119 So. 272; Carrere’s Sons v. Rumore, La.App., 52 So.2d 57.

The judgment appealed from is-affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### BOLINGER GAIN-YAY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marlon L. HARWELL et al., Defendants-Appellees.*

No. 5387.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1937.

C. F. Currier, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Blanchard, Goldstein, Walker & O’Quin, •of Shreveport, for appellees.

*

Rehearing denied March 1, 1937.

DREW, Judge.

This is the companion case discussed in suit No. 5386, styled Shreveport Armature & Electric Works, Incorporated, v. Marion L. Harwell et al., 172 So. 463.

The same issues are involved in both cases and they were consolidated for trial below and here.

For the reasons assigned in suit No. 5386, decided by us this day, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Blake, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 5, 2009



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/    RONALD L.
BLAKE                               
|Ronald L. Blake President and Chief Executive Officer



32
Presidential Documents

51213 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 170 

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8284 of August 28, 2008 

National Days of Prayer and Remembrance, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Days of Prayer and Remembrance, we pay special tribute 

to the thousands of innocent victims who died on September 11, 2001. 

Our Nation honors the brave citizens, service members, police officers, and 

firefighters who heroically responded in the face of terror. On these important 

days, we reflect on the terrible events of September 11, 2001, and lift 

the victims and their families in our prayers. 

Our Nation will never forget the individuals who lost their lives in New 

York, Pennsylvania, and at the Pentagon. America remains inspired by the 

countless acts of kindness and sacrifice we saw that day—fearless rescuers 

who rushed toward danger, a beloved priest who died helping others, two 

office workers who carried a disabled person 68 floors to safety. 

We also pray for the safety and success of the members of our Armed 

Forces now serving freedom’s cause. We seek God’s grace on their families, 

and commit to Heaven’s care those brave men and women He has called 

home. We ask the Almighty to watch over America and pray for His providence and continued blessings on our country. May He always guide the 

United States of America. As we defend our country against its enemies, 

we pray for help in protecting the gift of freedom from those who seek 

to destroy it, and we ask the Almighty to strengthen all those securing 

liberty on distant shores. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 5, 

through Sunday, September 7, 2008, as National Days of Prayer and Remembrance. I ask that the people of the United States and their places of worship 

mark these National Days of Prayer and Remembrance with memorial services, the ringing of bells, and evening candlelight remembrance vigils. I 

also invite all people across the world to share in these Days of Prayer 

and Remembrance. 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with MISCELLANEOUS
51214 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth 

day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtythird. 

[FR Doc. E8–20457 

Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PepBoys - Manny, Moe & Jack (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodending August 4, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”),

I, Jeffrey C. Rachor, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

(i)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Date:  September 18, 2007 |   | by: /s/ Jeffrey C. Rachor        |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Jeffrey C. Rachor                     |
|                           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 18-BG-401

IN RE CARL L. EPSTEIN

2018 DDN 46

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 411588

BEFORE: Fisher and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED –June 21, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Indiana Supreme Court 

suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of 

90 days with reinstatement contingent on showing fitness, this court’s April 27, 

2018, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why reciprocal 

discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel 

regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a 

response to this court’s order to show cause or his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g)

affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Carl L. Epstein is hereby suspended from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days with a fitness requirement. 

See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 

(D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all 

cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s 

period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. 

XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JONATHAN GRANT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 499 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of February, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.