alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wntteb ~tate5 QCourt of ~peal5 

for tbe jf eberal QCtrcutt 

SHIRLEY K. BAKER, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent. 

2010·3136 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in PH0845100348·I·1. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

The court treats Shirley K. Baker's motion for an ex· 

tension of time as a motion for reconsideration of the 

court's September 2, 2010 order dismissing her petition 

for review for failure to file a brief. Baker also moves for 

leave to proceed in form in forma pauperis. 

The court notes that Baker is not required to pay the 

docketing fee. 

Upon consideration thereof, 
BAKERv.OPM 2 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion for reconsideration will be granted, 

the mandate will be recalled, the dismissal order will be 

vacated, and the petition for review will be reinstated, if 

Baker files her informal brief (form enclosed) within 30 

days of the date of filing of this order. 

(2) Baker's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. The requirement that she pay 

the fee is waived. 

SEP 2 1 2010 

Date 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Shirley Baker (informal brief form enclosed) 

Michael D. Austin, Esq. 

s20 

FILED 

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

SEP 21 2010 

JAN HORBALY 

CLERK
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 668 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to fund youth workforce investment activities 

for certain local areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2021 

Mr. RUSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to fund youth workforce 

investment activities for certain local areas, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs Now Youth Em5 ployment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. YOUTH WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—From the amount made available 

8 under subsection (e) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall 

9 make allotments to local areas pursuant to subsection (b) 

10 for youth workforce investment activities under section 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 668 IH

1 129 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 

2 U.S.C. 3164). 

3 (b) FORMULA.—The allotment to a local area under 

4 subsection (a) shall be made on the basis of the relative 

5 number of long-term unemployed individuals in each local 

6 area, compared to the total number of long-term unem7 ployed individuals in all local areas. 

8 (c) DATA COLLECTION.—In carrying out subsection 

9 (a), the Secretary shall— 

10 (1) beginning not later than 180 days after the 

11 date of the enactment of this Act and annually 

12 thereafter, the Secretary shall collect long-term un13 employment rates for local areas; and 

14 (2) identify local areas that have long-term un15 employment rates above the national average for the 

16 year for which such data is collected. 

17 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section: 

18 (1) LOCAL AREA.—The term ‘‘local area’’ has 

19 the meaning given such term under section 3 of the 

20 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 

21 U.S.C. 3102). 

22 (2) LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT.—The term 

23 ‘‘long-term unemployment’’, used with respect to a 

24 local area, means the number of individuals in such 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 668 IH

1 local area who have been unemployed for 15 weeks 

2 or more. 

3 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

4 the Secretary of Labor. 

5 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

6 authorized to be appropriated to carry out the activities 

7 described in subsection (a) $10,000,000,000 for each year 

8 in the 10-year period beginning on the date that is the 

9 first fiscal year that commences following the existence of 

10 data collected under subsection (c). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
| **Accounting Policies (Details) $ in Millions**                            | Dec. 31, 2019 USD ($) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| **Accounting Policies [Abstract]**                                         |                  |
| Increase to allowance through retained earnings for ASU 2016-13, after-tax | $ 2                   |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Increase to allowance through retained earnings for ASU 2016-13, after-tax
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cinf_IncreasetoallowancethroughretainedearningsforASU201613aftertax**Namespace Prefix:**cinf_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
187 La. 257

#### STATE v. WASCOM.

No. 34312.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1937.

M. C. Rownd, of Springfield, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Dist. Atty., of Amite, and Joseph M. Blache, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., of Hammond, for the State.

*349ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant, Newman Wascom, was convicted and sentenced for the crime of cattle stealing. There was no appearance for defendant before this court and no brief filed in his behalf. The record contains no demurrer, no motion to quash, no motion for a new trial, and no motion in arrest of judgment. Nor does it contain a bill of exception to any ruling of the trial judge. We have examined the record and do not find any error in the proceeding. The record, therefore, presents nothing for this court to review.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
POLARIOD CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 26,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                          88,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,200)
<INVENTORY>                                    456,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,214,800
<PP&E>                                       2,025,700
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,428,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,090,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          792,800
<BONDS>                                        572,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,090,600
<SALES>                                      1,328,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,328,800
<CGS>                                          786,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,283,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6854 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6854

  To clarify the treatment of drawback on distilled spirits, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2022

Mr. Yarmuth (for himself and Mr. Womack) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the treatment of drawback on distilled spirits, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Duty Drawback Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF DRAWBACK ON DISTILLED SPIRITS.

    (a) Tax Treatment of Destroyed Spirits.--Section 5008(b) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The proprietor'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--The proprietor''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Prohibition on duty drawback.--The destruction of 
        distilled spirits under paragraph (1) may not be used as the 
        basis for a claim for drawback under section 313 of the Tariff 
        Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313).''.
    (b) Substitution Drawback for Whiskey.--Section 313(j) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
            ``(7) In the case of whiskey classifiable under subheading 
        2208.30 of the HTS, this subsection shall be applied and 
        administered--
                    ``(A) by substituting `6-digit HTS subheading 
                number' for `8-digit HTS subheading number' each place 
                it appears; and
                    ``(B) in paragraph (6)(A), by substituting `6 
                digits' for `8 digits'.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect and apply to drawback claims filed upon or after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION PAYABLE TO NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS




     The Board of Directors of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., on March 2, 2005, the Board approved the
payment of the following compensation to each non-management director of the Board in respect of
his service on the Board during fiscal 2005 (reduced per meeting fee
paid if attended by teleconference):




	•  	an annual retainer of $20,000, plus $7,500 per meeting, both paid in cash;






	•  	each committee chair receives $15,000 per committee chairmanship per year, except the
audit committee chair receives an annual retainer of $25,000;






	•  	each committee member also receives a per committee meeting fee of $1,500;






	•  	each non-employee directors who has joined our Board after we went public received an
initial stock option grant exercisable for 20,000 shares of common stock upon his first
election to the Board,






	•  	generally each of our non-employee directors receives an additional annual stock option
grant exercisable for 10,000 shares of common stock for each year of service after
initially becoming a member of the Board (such option grants for fiscal 2005 were made on
March 2, 2005); and






	•  	reimbursement of customary expenses for attending Board, committee and stockholders
meetings.
#### Carrie M. Newman, as Administratrix, etc., of William F. Newman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to §12,000, in which event judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6700 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 96-hour 

physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access hospital 

services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska (for himself and Ms. SEWELL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove 

the 96-hour physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access hospital services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Access Hos5 pital Relief Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6700 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING MEDICARE 96-HOUR PHYSICIAN CER2 TIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR INPATIENT 

3 CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814(a) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (6), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (7), at the end of subpara9 graph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ and inserting a period; 

10 and 

11 (3) by striking paragraph (8). 

12 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub13 section (a) shall apply with respect to items and services 

14 furnished on or after January 1, 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6559 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6559

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 
 higher education participating in Federal student assistance programs 
from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy 
                          students or donors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2022

Mr. Bowman (for himself, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Bush, 
 Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Pressley, and Ms. Jayapal) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 
 higher education participating in Federal student assistance programs 
from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy 
                          students or donors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair College Admissions for Students 
Act''.

SEC. 2. BAN ON LEGACY OR DONOR PREFERENCES IN ADMISSIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(30)(A) The institution will not provide any manner of 
        preferential treatment in the admission process to applicants 
        on the basis of their relationships to--
                    ``(i) donors to the institution; or
                    ``(ii) except as provided in subparagraph (B), 
                alumni of the institution.
            ``(B) The Secretary may waive the limitation described in 
        subparagraph (A)(ii) for an award year for an eligible 
        institution described in section 371(a) if such institution 
        demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that 
        preferential treatment in the admission process to applicants 
        on the basis of their relationships to alumni of the 
        institution is in the best interest of students who have been 
        historically underrepresented in higher education.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the second award year (as defined in 
section 481(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(a))) 
that begins after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Blake, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 8, 2008



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/ RONALD L. BLAKE                                  
|Ronald L. Blake President and Chief Executive Officer



28
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISES, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, CREDITORS, LEINORS AND TRUSTEES OF MARILYN ANN MASCOLO a/k/a MARILYN A. MASCOLO, DECEASED, AND ANY OTHER PERSONS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER AND AGAINST THE NAMED DEFENDANT, WAYNE A. MASCOLO, AS SUCCESSOR

TRUSTEE OF THE MARILYN ANN MASCOLO FAMILY TRUST AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 13, 2011, and DONNA MARIE MASCOLO , Appell ant s ,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE FOR PRETIUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3403

[ June 20, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry J. Stone

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No.
062013CA019879

.

Bruce K. Herman of The Herman Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Adam J. Knight and Jacqueline Simms

- Petredis of Burr & Forman, LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

M AY and F ORST
, JJ. and S ASSER
, M EENU , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
In the Matter of the No. 53441

- 0

- II Personal Restraint of DEMARCUS JEFFERY WILLIAMS, Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

C RUSER , J.

— Demarcus Williams seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his 2017 plea of guilty to first degree assault with a deadly weapon sentencing enhancement. The trial court calculated his offender score as 4.5, including as prior convictions juvenile felony adjudications in 2014 for “harassment (bodily injury)” and for “felony harassment.” Based on that offender score, the tria l court sentenced him to 155 months plus a 24

- month sentencing enhancement. He now argues that his judgment and sentence is facially invalid and that his plea of guilty was involuntary, because those juvenile felony adjudications do not exist, and so shou ld not have been included in his offender score. He asks to be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea. The State concedes that those felony adjudications do not exist and Williams was found guilty by the juvenile court in 2014 of only one count of gross misd emeanor harassment. However, it argues that Williams is entitled only to be resentenced, not to be allowed to withdraw his plea, because his guilty plea claim is time

- barred. In re Pers. Restraint of Toledo

- Sotelo , 176 Wn.2d 759, 770, 297 P.3d 51 (2013). We accept the State’s concession. Under Toledo

- Sotelo , RCW Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two September 4, 2019No. 53441

- 0

- II

2

10.73.090’s time

- bar applies to guilty plea claims unless the petitioner shows that one of the exceptions contained in RCW 10.73.100 applies. 176 Wn.2d at 770. Williams fails to do so.
Senten cing a defendant with an incorrect offender score does not exceed the court’s jurisdiction, so his petition is not exempt from the time

- bar under RCW 10.73.100(5). In re Pers. Restraint of Vehlewald , 92 Wn. App. 197, 203

- 04, 963 P.2d 903 (1998). Accordin gly, we grant Williams’s petition in part and remand his judgment and sentence for resentencing. A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in ac cordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

CRUSER, J. We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

MAXA, C.J.