alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Locke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 6, 2008



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. LOCKE                         
|Christopher J. Locke                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



35
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6068 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include publication of 

written news articles as a tax-exempt purpose for organizations, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. DESAULNIER (for himself, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. CICILLINE, and Mr. PERLMUTTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

publication of written news articles as a tax-exempt purpose for organizations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Local News 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF WRITTEN NEWS ARTICLES AS TAX7 EXEMPT PURPOSE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘or for 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6068 IH

1 the publication (including electronic publication) of writ2 ten news articles,’’ after ‘‘animals,’’. 

3 (b) INCOME FROM ADVERTISING NOT UNRELATED

4 BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME.—Section 512(a) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(7) SPECIAL RULE APPLICABLE TO NEWS OR8 GANIZATIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 501(c)(3).— 

9 In the case of an organization described in section 

10 501(c)(3) by reason of publication of written news 

11 articles, the term ‘unrelated business taxable income’ 

12 does not include any amount attributable to pay13 ments for advertisements in news publications.’’. 

14 (c) EXPEDITED APPLICATION.—Section 508 of the 

15 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

16 the end the following new subsection: 

17 ‘‘(g) TIMING FOR APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS BY

18 NEWS ORGANIZATIONS.—In the case of an organization 

19 described in section 501(c)(3) by reason of publication of 

20 written news articles, the Secretary shall approve or deny 

21 such organization for recognition of 501(c)(3) status not 

22 later than the date that is 12 months after notice is given 

23 under subsection (a).’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6068 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00272-CR

Raymond Paul SCHMIDT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6225

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial 

court. 

SIGNED March 4, 2015.

_____________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     UT
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                            4,745
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            534
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,506
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             5,978
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                         208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      14,971
<COMMON>                                             2,907
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                1
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                  (422)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                       2,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   93
<PREFERRED>                                            138
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 6,084
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                      68
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          939
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                             70
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        69
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       5,025
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                       14,971
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                            1,256
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                   103
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             874
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             977
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                280
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                    (42)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                         238
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                82
<NET-INCOME>                                           157
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                              3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                          154
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                56
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                               74
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                 182
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .68


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      31.2**

|                                     |                                                                                                         |                                 |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                                                         |
|                                |                                                                                                    |                            |
| Date:               August 11, 2005 | By:                                                                                                | /s/ Don              Norsworthy |
|                                     | Don              Norsworthy                                                                                  |
|                                     | Executive                Vice President, Chief                Financial Officer and                Treasurer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
(Amounts in 1,000's, except earnings per share)
Income tax expense includes $349,000 related to other income.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      748,359
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     26,354
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          90,746
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       176,830
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,042,289
<COMMON>                                       188,700
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (413)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            101,656
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 289,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,000
<PREFERRED>                                     50,905
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           299,683
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      850
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 4,817
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 381,091
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,042,289
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      158,197
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            13,732
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     118,177
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     131,560
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         26,637
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 994
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  27,631
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,261
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,370
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,313
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   14,057
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        10,693
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,420
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          45,156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.23
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,195
<SECURITIES>                                       150
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,733
<INVENTORY>                                    180,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               470,461
<PP&E>                                       3,314,692
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,433,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,412,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          366,265
<BONDS>                                        702,047
<COMMON>                                        32,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     886,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,412,908
<SALES>                                        416,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,418
<CGS>                                          366,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  366,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,009
<INCOME-TAX>                                       384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                625
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Patrick, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered March 16, 1988, which convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, a reputed member of a gang called the "Westies”, together with a cohort, killed a man in a "gangland execution” style and dumped his body in the Hudson River. Six months later, the body was discovered, and defendant was subsequently arrested and indicted for the murder. After the *85clerk was sent to get a panel of prospective jurors, defendant withdrew his not guilty plea and offered a plea of guilty. The allocution was proper in all respects and is not at issue on this appeal. However, on the date set for sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3). The court denied the motion and sentenced defendant in accordance with his plea bargain. Defendant contends that it was error to deny his motion to withdraw the guilty plea. We find this argument to be without merit.

A trial court Judge hearing a motion to withdraw a guilty plea "must exercise his discretion in affording defendant a reasonable opportunity to advance his claims from which an informed and prudent determination can be rendered” *(People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520, 525). "Only in the rare instance will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary hearing; often a limited interrogation by the court will suffice” *(People v Tinsley,*35 NY2d 926, 927).

The Trial Justice herein conducted an interrogation and was satisfied that defendant had not established a valid basis for granting the motion. Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the court abused its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea *(People v Frederick, supra). At*his plea allocution, defendant expressly admitted that he committed the crime charged. An expression of fear from "some unspecified source” cannot be a basis for finding coercion *(People v Kelly,*159 AD2d 227). Further, recognizing that defendant’s motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the court and that finality should accompany the results of plea negotiations *(People v Frederick, supra,*at 525), it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Marc J. EisenbergMarc J.  Eisenberg
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President (principal
executive officer)
    
    March 4, 2009/s/ Jerome B. EisenbergJerome B. Eisenberg
    
    Chairman of the Board
    
    March 4, 2009/s/ Didier DelepineDidier Delepine
    
    Director
    
    March 4, 2009/s/ Marco FuchsMarco Fuchs
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2009/s/ Hans E. W. HoffmannHans E.W. Hoffmann
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2009/s/ John MajorJohn Major
    
    Director
    
    March 4, 2009/s/ Gary H. RitondaroGary H. Ritondaro
    
    Director
    
    March 4, 2009/s/ Timothy KelleherTimothy Kelleher
    
    Director
    
    March 4, 2009/s/ Robert G. CostantiniRobert G. Costantini
    
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial and accounting officer)
    
    March 4, 2009
1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Preformed Line Products Company for
the period ended June 30, 2010 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Preformed Line
Products Company.
 August 5, 2010
    /s / Eric R. GraefEric R. GraefChief Financial Officer and
Vice President  Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Order entered July 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00842
- CR SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 005
- 83471
- 2012



### O RDER
We GRANT the Collin County Court a t Law Clerk’s Office’s July 2, 2013 request for an
extension of time to file the clerk’s record. Additionally, our records show the reporter’s record has not been timely filed. We EXTEND the time to file the clerk’s and reporter’s record s until
THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
# National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, 2008 

During National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, we remember those whose lives have been affected by this deadly disease, and we underscore our commitment to battling ovarian cancer for the sake of women around the world. 

Each year, thousands of American women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer.  Many will lose their lives to this disease.  Because ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, it is vital for women to make regular visits to their doctors for screenings and to discuss risk factors and warning signs.  Early detection is the best way to help doctors diagnose cancer before it has a chance to spread.  It also makes treatment more effective and increases the chances for survival.  I encourage all women to learn more about preventive measures and screening options that may help to save their lives. 

America leads the world in medical research, and my Administration remains dedicated to the fight against ovarian cancer.  I signed the “Gynecologic Cancer Education and Awareness Act of 2005,” or “Johanna's Law,” that helps to raise awareness among women and health care providers about female reproductive cancers.  Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are conducting important research to help make the innovative advances we need in order to eradicate this disease.  NIH's Cancer Genome Atlas is also helping researchers gain a greater understanding of the genetic sources of cancer.  Together, we will continue building on our progress until there is a cure for cancer. As we observe National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, we honor those who have fought this disease.  We also recognize the compassionate caregivers, doctors, and researchers who are dedicated to preventing, detecting, and treating ovarian cancer. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2008 as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month.  I call upon government officials, businesses, communities, health care professionals, educators, volunteers, and the people of the United States to continue our Nation's strong commitment to preventing and treating ovarian cancer. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E8-20270

Billing code 3195-01-P
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with the Workiva Platform-->
<!--Copyright 2023 Workiva-->
<!--r:f747d2fb-df05-419e-8952-f6562fda3e2a,g:ed879728-eb5b-4cde-94f9-d19e715baeb7-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:cinf="http://www.cinfin.com/20231031" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.cinfin.com/20231031">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2023" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2023/dei-2023.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cinf-20231031_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cinf-20231031_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPageCoverPage" roleURI="http://www.cinfin.com/role/CoverPageCoverPage">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Cover Page Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20163

Summary Calendar

 

IVO NABELEK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice; GARY JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice; JAMES ZELLER, Senior Warden,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-00-CV-3396)

 

July 30, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), Ivo Nabelek,

Texas prisoner # 669748, appeals the dismissal as frivolous,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), of his civil rights

complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing

as frivolous Nabelek’s involuntary-servitude claim and related ex

post facto challenge. See Ali v. Johnson, No. 00-10777, 2001 WL __

(5th Cir. 11 July 2001); see also Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433,
2

441 (1997). The district court’s failure to specifically address

Nabelek’s passing reference to a cruel-and-unusual-punishment

aspect of his involuntary-servitude claim is harmless, as prison

work assignments alone do not violate the Eighth Amendment. See

Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally,

the district court did not err by denying Nabelek’s motion for a

preliminary injunction and his request that payment of the

appellate filing fee be deferred until after this court addressed

the merits of his appeal. See Lakedreams v. Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103,

1107 (5th Cir. 1991); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 

Having considered these and the numerous related issues

raised, we conclude there is no reversible error.

The district court’s dismissal counts as a strike for purposes

of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387

(5th Cir. 1996). Nabelek is WARNED that if he accumulates three

strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal while

he is incarcerated of detained in any facility unless he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g).

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED