alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6000

WILLIAM RICKY DIXON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-374-R)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Ricky Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his requests

to have counsel appointed and to have sanctions imposed for the

Appellee's failure to comply with the district court's discovery

orders. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Dixon v. Saunders, No. CA-95-374-R

(W.D. Va. Nov. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 11


The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the 1988 Stock Option Plan will be
exercised.

(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Second Quarter       First Six Months
                                                      -------------------    ------------------
                                                        2001        2000       2001       2000
                                                      -------     -------    -------    -------
<S>                                                   <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>
Net Earnings(1)                                       $ 1,379     $ 2,848    $ 2,629    $ 5,866
                                                      ===================    ==================
Weighted average common shares outstanding(2)           6,861       7,038      6,869      7,097

Common share equivalents relating to stock options          1           1          1          1

Adjusted common and common equivalent                 -------------------    ------------------
   shares for computation(3)                            6,862       7,039      6,870      7,098
                                                      ===================    ==================
Net earnings per share:
     Basic (1 divided by 2)                           $  0.20    $   0.40    $  0.38    $  0.83
                                                      ===================    ==================
     Diluted (1 divided by 3)                         $  0.20    $   0.40    $  0.38    $  0.83
                                                      ===================    ==================
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Chronic Care 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION:  Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 26th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: September 8, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest 
to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/chroniccare/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will discuss progress made to 
date and future steps regarding secure messaging and remote care as it 
relates to the transition to the new AHIC.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/chroniccare/cc_instruct.html.

    Dated: August 11, 2008.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. E8-20331 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
EXHIBIT
32.1
  THE
PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending October 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory
J. Young, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*;
      and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/  Gregory J.
    Young
 Gregory
J. Young
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 
 December
21, 2009
  * - The report does not so comply to the extent
described within Note 1 to the financial statements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 09/79-0453]

Notice is hereby given that Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., 360 Post Street, Suite 601, San Francisco, CA 94108, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to LDR Holding Corporation, 4030 W. Braker Lane, Suite 360, Austin, TX 78759. The financing is contemplated for working capital and growth purposes.

                    The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Telegraph Hill Partners II, L.P., THP II Affiliates Fund, L.P., THP Affiliates Fund, L.P., all Associates of Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC, L.P., in the aggregate own more                           ( print page 51688)                        than ten percent of LDR Holding Corporation, and therefore LDR Holding Corporation is considered an Associate of Telegraph Hill Partners SBIC as described in 13 CFR 107.50.                

Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: August 12, 2008.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

 [FR Doc. E8-20458 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40087

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL GABRIEL LINARES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-1081-2

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rafael Gabriel Linares has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Linares has filed a response and two supplemental responses. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Linares’s response and supplemental responses. We concur 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 25, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40087 Document: 00512782332 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/25/2014
No. 14-40087

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40087 Document: 00512782332 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/25/2014
#### James R. McMANNUS, Appellant, v. MIDLAND CONSTRUCTORS, Inc., an Illinois corporation, and Florida Power and Light Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

July 31, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 1, 1956.

Kelner & Lewis, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Ross & Reinhardt, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that -it is-manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need! no further argument; • -

*350It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to 'affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.
|  | • | the Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the  Partnership. |
|--|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      JOHN B. WALKER                            |               |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                                |     |
| John      B. Walker                                |               |
| Chief      Executive Officer of EV Management LLC, |               |
| general      partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,        |               |
| general      partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P.   |               |

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEDERICO OCAMPO RAMIREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73621

Agency No. A076-365-168

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Federico Ocampo Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of

removal and motion for continuance. After the Board reversed the IJ’s initial grant

FILED

OCT 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

of cancellation relief and remanded for further proceedings, the IJ held a hearing

and considered further evidence supporting Ramirez’s application for cancellation

of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part

and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Ramirez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United

States citizen child. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,

552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009). Likewise, we lack jurisdiction to review the

agency’s denial of Ramirez’s motion to reopen based on further evidence of

hardship introduced at the IJ hearing on remand. Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d

592, 600 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining that § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars jurisdiction when

question presented in motion to reopen is essentially the same hardship ground

originally decided).

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Ramirez’s motion for a

continuance because Ramirez did not demonstrate good cause. 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.29; see Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 2008)

(reviewing for abuse of discretion).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.







Date: May 13, 2011
By:
/s/ MaryjoCohenMaryjo CohenChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, PAUL J. EVANSON, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                            
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Paul J. Evanson        
|                       |  | Paul J. Evanson            
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  | Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 6 (a) 11

                            PORTEC, INC.
                            ------------

               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
               ------------------------------------------

                        Three Months                 Nine Months
                     Ended September 30          Ended September 30
                   ----------------------      ----------------------
                   1996              1995      1996              1995
                   ----              ----      ----              ----

  Average Shares 
    Outstanding    4,574,739    4,599,347      4,575,311    4,601,749       

  Net Income      $1,008,000    $ 954,000     $4,902,000   $5,130,000

  Per Share
    Amount        $      .22    $     .21     $     1.07   $     1.11
Presidential Documents

51211 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 170 

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of August 28, 2008 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect To 

Certain Terrorist Attacks 

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 

1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency I declared 

on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist 

attacks at the World Trade Center, New York, New York, the Pentagon, 

and aboard United Airlines flight 93, and the continuing and immediate 

threat of further attacks on the United States. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on 

September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with 

that emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2008. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency 

I declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

August 28, 2008 [FR Doc. E8–20444 

Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6899 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6899

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from engaging in transactions 
    involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued by the 
International Monetary Fund that are held by the Russian Federation or 
                                Belarus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Russia and Belarus SDR Exchange 
Prohibition Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS EXCHANGE PROHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury may not engage in 
any transaction involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued 
by the International Monetary Fund that are held by the Russian 
Federation or Belarus.
    (b) Advocacy.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall--
            (1) vigorously advocate that the governments of the member 
        countries of the International Monetary Fund, to the extent 
        that the member countries issue freely usable currencies, 
        prohibit transactions involving the exchange of Special Drawing 
        Rights held by the Russian Federation or Belarus and
            (2) direct the United States Executive Director at each 
        international financial institution (as defined in section 
        1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) to 
        use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose the 
        provision of financial assistance to the Russian Federation and 
        Belarus, except to address basic human needs of the civilian 
        population.
    (c) Termination.--The preceding provisions of this section shall 
have no force or effect on the earlier of--
            (1) the date that is 5 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; or
            (2) 30 days after the date that the President reports to 
        the Congress that the governments of the Russian Federation and 
        Belarus have ceased destabilizing activities with respect to 
        the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
    (d) Waiver.--The President may waive the application of this 
section if the President reports to the Congress that the waiver is in 
the national interest of the United States and includes an explanation 
of the reasons therefor.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```