alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        10883
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        410
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             562
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                          2600
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14902
<COMMON>                                          3518
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            1
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               1113
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    4632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               93
<PREFERRED>                                        199
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              4186
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 282
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     149
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       54
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        129
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    60
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    5267
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    14902
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         3270
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               273
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        2299
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        2572
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            698
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   3
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     701
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           302
<NET-INCOME>                                       399
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         14
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      385
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           290
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          251
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES INC. AS OF
AND AS RESTATED FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                    17,345
<RECEIVABLES>                            427,375
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                      111,600
<PP&E>                                    25,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           679,763
<SHORT-TERM>                              63,781
<PAYABLES>                               365,554
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                        21,491
<LONG-TERM>                               73,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  17,566
<OTHER-SE>                               138,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             679,763
<TRADING-REVENUE>                        124,910
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                      33,765
<COMMISSIONS>                            145,492
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>             64,138
<FEE-REVENUE>                             63,402
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,741
<COMPENSATION>                           262,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (22,653)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               (22,653)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (14,118)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.82) <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.82) <F2>
<FN>
<F1> BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE - COMPUTED UNDER SFAS 128
<F2> DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE - COMPUTED UNDER SFAS 128
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of George Karam, Doing Business as Thrifty’s Food Store, Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: The determination of the State Liquor Authority that petitioner had sold beer to a minor was based solely upon the hearsay statement of the minor, who did not appear at the hearing. Under the circumstances of the case, the hearsay statement did not constitute substantial evidence to sustain the Authority’s determination. Substantial evidence is " 'evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in serious affairs’ ” *(People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 139, quoting from *National Labor Relations Bd. v Remmington Rand,*94 F2d 862, 873, *cert denied*304 US 576). Although the Authority is entitled to rely upon hearsay evidence, if the hearsay evidence is "controverted seriously”, it may fail to provide substantial evidence necessary to support the Authority’s determination *(Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v State Liq. Auth.,*24 NY2d 174, 179). Here, the hearsay statement was controverted by the evidence presented by petitioner to such an extent that it cast serious doubt upon the statement’s reliability and, thus, failed to provide substantial evidence to support the determination. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EX-35 (b)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

August 24, 2007

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust
    2006-FRE2

 Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 5/1/2006,
 the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
 certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

 (i) A review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
year and of performance under this Agreement has been made under such officer's
supervision.

 (ii) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, except as
 otherwise provided on Schedule A hereto, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its
 obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects
 throughout the reporting period.


Certified By:
/s/ Elisabeth A. Brewster
Elisabeth A. Brewster, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary

(page)

Schedule A

Reporting Errors

 During the reporting period, one or more of the monthly investor reports
 contained certain types of errors in regard to the calculation and or the
 reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets. To the best of the signing
 officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been material,
 has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has been
 disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the reporting
 period.

MABS 2006-FRE2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40694

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEAN THOMAS MORTON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-203-ALL-MAC

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dean Thomas Morton, Jr., appeals following his guilty plea

to possession with intent to distribute less than 100 grams of a

mixture containing a detectible amount of phencyclidine. The

Government has waived Morton’s appeal waiver in the plea

agreement by not seeking to enforce it. See United States v.

Story, 439 F.3d 226, 230 (5th Cir. 2006). 

Morton argues that his sentence is invalid in light of

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), because the
No. 04-40694

-2-

district court applied the Sentencing Guidelines as if they were

mandatory. We review for plain error. See United States v.

Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 267 (2005). To prevail under a plain-error analysis,

Morton must show, among other things, that the error prejudiced

him by adversely affecting his substantial rights. See id. at

733.

Morton fails to identify anything in the record to suggest

that his sentence would have been lower had the court applied the

Sentencing Guidelines as advisory rather than mandatory. See id.

He thus fails to establish prejudice to his substantial rights. 

See id. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal period ending May 5, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tod A. Nestor, SeniorVice President Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# (1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Tod A. Nestor                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Tod  A. Nestor                                     |   |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

May 22, 2008

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

**Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-137707 on Form S-8 of our report relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limitedand Subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includesexplanatory paragraphs relating to ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limitedbeing in the development stage and the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*,and the initial application of the provisions of Staff Accounting BulletinNo. 108, *Considering the Effects of Prior YearMisstatements when Qualifying Misstatements in Current Year FinancialStatements)* dated April 2, 2007, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.**

**/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP**

Seattle, WashingtonApril 2, 2007

** **

----
Page 1 of 26

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

 

 

Quarterly Report under Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

For Quarter Ended June 30, 2001

Commission File Number 1-3376-2

 

 

THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland and Virginia
13-5323955
(State(s) of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

10435 Downsville Pike, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740-1766

Telephone Number - 301-790-3400

 

 

 

 

     The registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     At August 14, 2001, 22,385,000 shares of the Common Stock (no par value) of the registrant were outstanding, all of which are held by Allegheny Energy, Inc., the Company's parent.
**2

 
**THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY

Form 10-Q for Quarter Ended June 30, 2001**
 

 
**Index

 
** 

 
 
**Page No.**PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Consolidated Statement of Operations - Three and six months**********
#### Misrak AYALEW, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-2232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 2003.

Decided Aug. 12, 2003.

*243Mikre-Michael Ayelle, Arlington, VA, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation, John M. McAdams, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Misrak Ayalew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying her motion to reconsider and reconsider en banc. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ayalew’s motion to reconsider. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. *See In re: Ayalew,*No. [ AXXXXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Sept. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gaye Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10 KSB of Online Originals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)    designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

    b)    evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)    presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)    any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date: March 23, 2007


By:      /s Gaye Adams
         -------------
         Gaye Adams
         President and CEO
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Citicorp Venture Capital Ltd.
Address:   399 Park Avenue
           New York, New York 10043

Form 13F File Number:              28-1090

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Helene Shavin
Title:     Vice President
Phone:     (212) 559-1132

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Helene Shavin          New York, New York         August 16, 1999
-----------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to Long Beach Securities Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of April 1, 2006 (the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between Long Beach Mortgage Company, as servicer and predecessor in interest to the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-A for the 2006 fiscal year  (the“Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6643 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 with respect to 

certain regulatory actions related to hydraulic fracturing within the Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2022 

Mr. PERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 

with respect to certain regulatory actions related to hydraulic fracturing within the Susquehanna, Delaware, 

and Potomac River basins, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Denying Regulatory 

5 Interference with Landowners and Legislatures Now Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘DRILL Now Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6643 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING WITHIN 

2 THE SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTO3 MAC RIVER BASINS. 

4 Section 5019 of the Water Resources Development 

5 Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(f) REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.— 

8 Notwithstanding any provision of the Susquehanna River 

9 Basin Compact to which consent was given by Public Law 

10 91–575 (84 Stat. 1512), the Delaware River Basin Com11 pact to which consent was given by Public Law 87–328 

12 (75 Stat. 691), or the Potomac River Basin Compact to 

13 which consent was given by Public Law 91–407 (84 Stat. 

14 856), the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, the 

15 Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Interstate 

16 Commission on the Potomac River Basin, as applicable, 

17 may not finalize, implement, or enforce any regulation re18 lating to hydraulic fracturing that is issued pursuant to 

19 any authority other than that of the State in which the 

20 regulation is to be implemented or enforced.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS