alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6790 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to authorize the placement of certain 

types of private headstones in Arlington National Cemetery, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee 

on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to authorize the placement of certain types of private headstones in Arlington 

National Cemetery, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arlington Cemetery 

5 Marker Fairness Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6790 IH

1 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN PRIVATE HEADSTONES IN 

2 ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

4 authorize the placement in a covered area of Arlington Na5 tional Cemetery of a private headstone if such head6 stone— 

7 (1) is placed within 20 feet of another private 

8 headstone; 

9 (2) is not larger than the plot on which it is 

10 placed; 

11 (3) meets the specifications provided in the Ar12 lington National Cemetery Memorialization Policy, 

13 as in effect on December 31, 2016; 

14 (4) is not a ledger, marker of freestanding cross 

15 design, narrow shaft, mausoleum, or overground 

16 vault; and 

17 (5) does not exceed four feet in width and four 

18 feet in height, including both the base and the die. 

19 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

20 (1) The term ‘‘private headstone’’ means a 

21 headstone other than a standard white uniform mili22 tary grave marker. 

23 (2) The term ‘‘covered area’’, with respect to 

24 Arlington National Cemetery, means an area within 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6790 IH

1 one of the original 13 sections of the cemetery that 

2 were designated for private markers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

      ( print page 52058)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; National Children's Study Repository, RFP: NIH-NICHD-NCS-09-07.                     

*Date:*                         October 6, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                     

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 28, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-20647 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Costello, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bianchi, J.), rendered December 12, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon beyond a reasonable doubt is without merit. The defendant conceded that he possessed the gun. The only issue at trial was whether he intended to turn it over to the police. The prosecution produced testimony from Sergeant Will T. Williams, a private security officer, that when he instructed the defendant to stop his vehicle on the side of the road, the defendant drove off, leading to a chase in which the defendant ran two red lights, zigzagged through traffic at approximately 20 miles above the speed limit, and only stopped his vehicle after being informed by Sergeant Williams over the loudspeaker on Williams’ car that he had the defendant’s plate number. This evidence was sufficient to rebut the defendant’s claim that he possessed the *610gun temporarily with the intention of giving it to the police *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Hooper and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000077231
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA ENTERPRISES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  257,309,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 11,107,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      61,735,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    36,827,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             366,978,000
<COMMON>                                    48,428,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   21,865,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         47,245,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             117,538,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          640,000
<PREFERRED>                                 15,848,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       125,000,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           4,500,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               14,720,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       80,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              88,652,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              366,978,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  155,564,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         3,618,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 139,648,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 143,266,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     12,298,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           1,395,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              13,693,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     6,866,000
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,827,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    991,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                5,836,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     8,583,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                    4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      15,413,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6915 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6915

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include education on trailer 
                safety in State highway safety programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2022

 Mr. Burchett (for himself and Mr. Garamendi) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to include education on trailer 
                safety in State highway safety programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trailer Safety Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. TRAILER SAFETY PROGRAMS.

    Section 402(a)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (xiii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (xiv) by striking the semicolon and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (xiv) the following:
                            ``(xv) to educate the public about proper 
                        and safe usage of light- and medium-duty 
                        trailers, including required safety equipment 
                        and preventive maintenance for safety;''.
                                 <all>
```
#### GOMER v. ANDING et al.

No. 1079.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 7, 1933.

Application for Rehearing Dismissed April 17, 1933.

Breazeale & Sachse, of Baton Rouge, for applicants.

LeBLANC, Judge.

In this suit, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Miss Claire Olla Gomer, against the defendants, Allen A. Anding, Jr., and the Union Indemnity Company, in solido, for damages arising out of an automobile accident. On appeal to this court, the judgment of the district court was affirmed. Neither of the defendants cast in the judgment, both of whom had appealed, have applied for a rehearing and the delays have expired. Within the time allowed for such application however, the Independence Indemnity Company, surety on the suspensive appeal bond furnished by defendants and appellants, did formally apply for a rehearing urging various reasons why one should be granted and that finally the judgment rendered be reversed and the suit dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

Article 911 Code of Practice stipulates the time at which a judgment rendered in the Supreme Court shall become final, providing that in the interval between the day on which it is rendered and that on which it would become final, “parties in interest” shall have the right to apply for rehearing. Article 912 further provides that in this same interval, “a party dissatisfied with the judgment may apply to the court for a new hearing in the cause” .pointing out the procedure to be followed. We do not understand that by the terms “parties in interest” and “party dissatisfied” it was meant that any party who may be indirectly interested in the outcome of the suit could make the application, but only those having a direct interest in it and who are actually parties by some form of pleading and take part in the trial thereof. We so understand the Supreme Court to have held in the case of City of New Orleans v. Liberty Shop, 157 La. 26, 191 So. 798, 803, 40 A. L. R. 1136, when in dismissing an application for rehearing filed by an amicus eurise it said: “We have heretofore held that no one except a party to the suit may apply for a rehearing, and that an amicus eurise has no standing in court to do so.” We know of no provision of the Code of Practice under which a surety on an appeal bond could be classed as a party to a suit, and the application in this case will have to be disposed of in the same manner as was the one in the case cited.

For the reasons stated, it is ordered the application for rehearing herein filed by Independence Indemnity Company be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at its costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donnell Jenkins, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), rendered November 25, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Hooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51507-51508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-14938-A, F-14938-B, and F-14938-D; AK-962-1410-HY-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to St. Michael 
Native Corporation. The lands are in the vicinity of St. Michael, 
Alaska, and are located in:

Lot 2, U.S. Survey No. 12417, Alaska

    Containing 54.85 acres.

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 24 S., R. 15 W.,
    Secs. 1 and 12.
    Containing 1,280.00 acres.
T. 23 S., R. 17 W.,
    Sec. 18.
    Containing 1.17 acres.
T. 24 S., R. 18 W.,
    Secs. 6, 7, and 8; Sec. 15; Secs. 17 to 22, inclusive.
    Containing 5,646.37 acres.
    Aggregating 6,982.39 acres.

    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to Bering 
Straits Native Corporation when the surface estate is conveyed to St. 
Michael Native Corporation. Notice of the decision will also be 
published four times in the Nome Nugget.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until October 3, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222

[[Page 51508]]

West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by 
phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddbcb6f3bfb1b0f3beb2b3abb8a4bcb3beb89dbcb6f3bfb1b0f3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5332387d313f3e7d303c3d25362a323d30361332387d313f3e7d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Joe J. Labay,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.
[FR Doc. E8-20339 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6693 

To permit aliens seeking asylum to be eligible for employment in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Ms. PINGREE (for herself, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms. OMAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit aliens seeking asylum to be eligible for 

employment in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asylum Seeker Work 

5 Authorization Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR ALIENS SEEK7 ING ASYLUM. 

8 Paragraph (2) of section 208(d) of the Immigration 

9 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d)) is amended to 

10 read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6693 IH

1 ‘‘(2) EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) ELIGIBILITY.—The Secretary of 

3 Homeland Security shall authorize employment 

4 for an applicant for asylum who is not in deten5 tion and whose application for asylum has not 

6 been determined frivolous. 

7 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION.—An applicant for asy8 lum who is not otherwise eligible for employ9 ment authorization shall not be granted such 

10 authorization prior to 30 days after the date of 

11 filing of the application for asylum. 

12 ‘‘(C) TERM.—Employment authorization 

13 for an applicant for asylum— 

14 ‘‘(i) shall be for a period of 2 years or 

15 more; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) shall be renewable for additional 

17 2-year periods for the entire continuous pe18 riod necessary to adjudicate the applicant’s 

19 asylum claim, including administrative or 

20 judicial review.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.454


 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


 


For
good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the undersigned, INLAND REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., an
Illinois corporation, (“Assignor”) hereby assigns to INLAND WESTERN GREENSBORO
AIRPORT CENTER, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, (“Assignee”) all
of Assignor’s right, title and interest as a party to that certain Purchase and
Sale Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between INLAND REAL ESTATE
ACQUISITIONS, INC., or its designees, (collectively, “Purchaser”), and FRC WEST
PROPERTY, L.L.C., AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC., and
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, (collectively, “Seller”), dated
December 16, 2004 for purchase and sale of certain real property commonly known
as 7701 Airport Center, Greensboro, NC (the “Property”).


 


By
execution hereof by Assignee, Assignee for itself and its successors and
assigns hereby accepts the assignment and assumes all of the obligations of
Assignor under the Purchase Agreement with respect to the Property.


 


This
Assignment is effective as of the 16 day
of December, 2004.


 


	
  ASSIGNOR:

  	
   

  	
  INLAND REAL ESTATE
  ACQUISITIONS, INC.,

  an Illinois corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Joseph Cosenza

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  G. Joseph Cosenza

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ASSIGNEE:

  	
   

  	
  INLAND WESTERN GREENSBORO
  AIRPORT

  CENTER, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability

  company

  By: Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.,

  its sole member

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Joseph Cosenza

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:  Authorized Representative
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *407Cleo Bryant, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered April 7, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of a fair trial because of alleged improper and prejudicial comments made by the prosecutor during his summation. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecutor’s reference to a boy caught with jelly-covered hands to illustrate the concept of circumstantial evidence did not exceed the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument *(cf., People v Dunlap,*138 AD2d 393). Nor did the prosecutor call upon the jury to draw a conclusion not fairly inferable from the evidence *(cf., People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105). Although the prosecutor misspoke when he remarked that the defendant pleaded guilty to the charges, instead of not guilty, this patently obvious slip of the tongue was immediately rectified by both the court and the prosecutor, and, thus, was innocuous to the outcome of the trial.

The remainder of the challenged remarks were not preserved for appellate review by the defendant’s belated motion for a mistrial made at the conclusion of the prosecutor’s summation *(see, People v Bruen,*136 AD2d 648). In any event, the act of impropriety committed by the prosecutor when he made a reference to the defendant’s failure to testify, which was unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law *(see, People v Brown,*91 AD2d 615; *cf., People v Allen,*121 AD2d 453, *affd*69 NY2d 915; *People v Baldo,*107 AD2d 751) does not warrant reversal in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Here, the proof of the defendant’s guilt is strong and the likelihood that this remark affected the jury’s verdict is minimal, particularly in view of the trial court’s subsequent charge to the jury, which clarified the defendant’s constitutional privilege and admonished that no inference was to be drawn from his failure to testify *(see, People v Scott,*138 AD2d 421; *cf., People v Montalvo,*125 AD2d 338; *People v Brown, supra).*Mangano, P. J., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.