alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Susser Holdings Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam L. Susser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |    |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 17, 2009 |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | By |  | /s/    SAM L. SUSSER                 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |    |  | Sam L. Susser                        
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-040
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1782-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1782-DR), dated August 11, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 20, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 11, 2008. 

Merrimack and Strafford Counties for Public Assistance. 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-20077 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:



/s/ DAVID T. PROVOST David T. Provost Chief Executive OfficerMarch 27, 2014/s/ DENNIS KLAESER Dennis Klaeser Chief Financial OfficerMarch 27, 2014


---



QuickLinks
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.26  


Abbott Laboratories  


 
 

Description of Base Salary of Named Executive Officers    
    


        Set forth below are the base salaries, effective March 1, 2004 and March 1, 2005, of the chief executive officer and each of the four other most
highly compensated executive officers in 2004. 


Miles
D. White

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 



	 
	 	Base Salary
	 	 

	2004	 	$	1,560,000	 	 
	2005	 	$	1,614,600	 	 






Richard
A. Gonzalez

President and Chief Operating Officer,

Medical Products Group 



	 
	 	Base Salary
	 	 

	2004	 	$	880,000	 	 
	2005	 	$	910,800	 	 






Jeffrey
M. Leiden

President and Chief Operating Officer,

Pharmaceutical Products Group 



	 
	 	Base Salary
	 	 

	2004	 	$	880,000	 	 
	2005	 	$	910,800	 	 






Thomas
C. Freyman

Executive Vice President, Finance and 

Chief Financial Officer 



	 
	 	Base Salary
	 	 

	2004	 	$	625,000	 	 
	2005	 	$	750,000	 	 






William
G. Dempsey

Senior Vice President,

Pharmaceutical Operations 



	 
	 	Base Salary
	 	 

	2004	 	$	575,000	 	 
	2005	 	$	595,100	 	 














QuickLinks


Description of Base Salary of Named Executive Officers
exv10w1w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.1.2




Performance Goals Under Newell Rubbermaid Inc.

Management Cash Bonus Plan



The Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Management Cash Bonus Plan (“Bonus Plan”), effective January 1, 2002,
provides for the payment of annual cash bonuses to employees who are considered to be management
level and are selected by the Organizational Development & Compensation Committee (the “Committee”)
of the Board of Directors. The Bonus Plan provides that for a calendar year the Committee will
establish corporate performance goals and a bonus payment schedule detailing the amount that may be
paid to each participant based upon the level of attainment of the performance goals. As approved
by the Committee and the Board of Directors, bonus payments for the 2005 calendar year will be
based on a combination of the following business criteria: for Corporate participants, earnings
per share and cash flow; for Group participants, earnings per share, cash flow and operating
income; and for Divisional participants, earnings per share, cash flow, operating income and, for
certain divisions, sales growth. Payouts for Group level participants will include a 50% component
based on attainment of Corporate performance criteria (with the remainder of their payouts based on
Group performance criteria).
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------




                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                   CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-HYB3
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HYB3


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                  Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1543

No. 00-1568

JOHN CLAUSON,

Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

NEW ENGLAND INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued June 22, 2001, is amended

as follows:

On page 12, lines 16-17, replace “Indeed, NEIC conceded at oral

argument that the court's interpretation was reasonable.” with the

following:

Indeed, at oral argument, while maintaining that the court's

interpretation was, from its point of view, incorrect, NEIC

also acknowledged that "the meaning works," conceding, in

effect, that the reading offered by the district court was

a reasonable response to the language of the policy.
#### CHAPMAN v. MOORE.

No. 14132.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 2, 1932.

Hubert M. Ansley, of New Orleans, for appellant.

M. C. Scharff and Frank Maeheea, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit against Thomas F. Moore for damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from a fall through the second floor gallery of the premises No. 1601 Chippewa street, owned by the defendant Moore.

There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $1,144, and defendant has appealed.

On the question of liability the defendant seems to rely entirely upon the contention that the accident did not happen, and his argument in this regard is based largely upon the ground that there was immediately under the hole in the gallery, through which plaintiff alleges she fell, an icebox upon which there rested a bowl or starch measuring about twelve inches in diameter and that the bowl of starch was undisturbed by her fall. In other words, the defendant claims that the fall could not have happened without upsetting the starch which was directly under the aperture in the gallery. Whatever may have been the situation with respect to the starch and the icebox, the evidence in the record is overwhelmingly to the effect that plaintiff did fall in the manner which she claims. She was a subtenant of the defendant and occupied a room on the second floor which was approached by means of a small gallery through which she fell. The hole in the gallery was caused by loose planking which was dislodged by the weight of plaintiff’s body as she stepped upon it, although the planks themselves, which have been offered in evidence, seem strong enough to have supported many times plaintiff’s weight. The trouble seems to have been that they were not secured. At any rate, at least two witnesses testified to seeing the hole in the gallery and plaintiff reclining upon the brick pavement below. She was transported to the Charity Hospital in an ambulance, where she remained some 46 days.

We, like the trial court, are convinced that the accident happened in the manner claimed, and, since there is no other defense we find the defendant liable.

Plaintiff’s injuries consisted of a fracture of tne surgical neck of the right humerus and contusions and brush burns. Her physician, testifying some eight months after the accident, stated that there was a decided impairment in the muscular function of her right arm which he estimated to be about 25 per cent, of normal. I-Ie also stated that in the course of time this condition would right itself. Plaintiff’s expenses, because of the accident, amounted to the sum of $160. She was a woman forty-eight years of age. It seems to us that the amount allowed by our brother below was correct.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Alex Gutchen et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Louis Dembitzer, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 24, 1955.

*Abraham Lillienthal*for plaintiffs.

*James F. Dwyer*for defendant.

*651Benedict D. Dineen, J.

Plaintiffs move for an order to restrain defendant from proceeding with a proposed appeal in arbitration.

A dispute having arisen between the parties hereto and all being members of the Diamond Trade Association of America, Inc., they agreed to submit their dispute to arbitration pursuant to the by-laws and regulations as established and provided therefor by said association. Arbitration of the dispute proceeded in accordance with the agreement before the arbitration chamber of the association, which made a finding that the dispute between the parties did not arise out of or connected with the diamond business and, consequently, is not within the jurisdiction of the chamber to decide. The arbitration rules of the association by its by-laws provided for an appeal to the arbitration board and this procedure must be considered as part of the machinery set up for the purposes of determining arbitrable issues. Until such time as all the remedies within the association providing for arbitration of disputes are exhausted can the court be urged to act. The parties, having selected their own method of determining their dispute, are bound by the methods and procedure of the association whose manner of arbitration they have agreed to abide by. Since the appeal is provided for by the by-laws and regulations of the association, any decision or award may be acted upon by such tribunal in accordance with such by-laws. The motion is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>               AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                         2,807,378
<SECURITIES>                   8,973,122
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,037,540
<ALLOWANCES>                      95,000
<INVENTORY>                    3,689,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,882,274
<PP&E>                         4,706,844
<DEPRECIATION>                 2,028,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                19,884,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,731,596
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                       4,877,240
<OTHER-SE>                    11,906,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  19,884,726
<SALES>                        1,367,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,367,983
<CGS>                          1,478,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,478,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               2,886,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   548
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,816,563)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,816,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,816,563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.23)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2402-108-MI]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Upper Peninsula Power Company's proposed shoreline management plan for the Prickett Hydroelectric Project, located on the Sturgeon River in Baraga and Houghton Counties, Michigan, and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA).

                    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number (P-2402) excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

Any comments on the EA should be filed by September 29, 2008, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. Please reference the project name and project number (P-2402) on all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “eFiling” link. For further information, contact Jon Cofrancesco at (202) 502-8951.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-20525 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Outsourcing Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gary L. Weller, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Gary L. Weller
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gary L. Weller
                                         Executive Vice President
                                         and Chief Financial Officer

                                         August 13, 2002
" ,. 

In The
 

Court of Appeals
 

for the
 

First District of Texas
 

No. 01-94-00590-CR 

Singleton, Timothy Dale, Appellant 

v. 

Texas, The State of, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court of
 

HARRIS County, Texas
 

Trial Court Cause No. 646,193
 

ORDER 

No brief has been filed. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 53(m) and 74 (1)(2), the trial court shall 

determine whether the appellant wishes to prosecute his appeal and, if he does, whether he has 

been deprived of a brief and a statement of facts because of indigency, ineffective assistance of 

counsel, or for any other reason. 
i 

For this purpose, the trial court shall conduct such hearings as may be necessary, make 

appropriate findings and recommendations, and prepare a record of the proceedings. If the 

appellant is indigent, the judge shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation by counsel, which may include the appointment of counsel and ordering the 

preparation of a statement of facts. 

The record so made, including any findings and orders of the trial judge, shall be sent 

to this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. If appropriate, the record may 

include an affidavit rahter than a statement of facts. 

It is so ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM 

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 90. 

Order Entered: January 11, 1995 

True Copy Attest: 

Margie Thompson, Clerk