alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6435 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6435

  To provide for the application of certain provisions of the Secure 
 Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 for fiscal 
                               year 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2022

Mrs. Rodgers of Washington (for herself and Mr. Neguse) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and 
 in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the application of certain provisions of the Secure 
 Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 for fiscal 
                               year 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COUNTY ELECTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 UNDER THE SECURE RURAL 
              SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITY SELF-DETERMINATION ACT OF 2000.

    Sections 102(b)(1)(D), 102(d)(1)(F), and 102(d)(3)(D) of the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 
7112(b)(1)(D), 7112(d)(1)(F), 7112(d)(3)(D)) shall be applied for 
fiscal year 2021.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1999          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1999          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                            9,313                8,943
<SECURITIES>                      1,517                  631
<RECEIVABLES>                    12,142                8,107
<ALLOWANCES>                          0                    0
<INVENTORY>                      76,410               76,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                102,770              102,489
<PP&E>                           13,734               13,114
<DEPRECIATION>                   (7,350)              (6,701)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  118,757              119,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            86,699               53,091
<BONDS>                               0                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               265                  264
<PREFERRED>                           0                    0
<COMMON>                            415                    0
<OTHER-SE>                       25,634               17,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    118,757              119,710
<SALES>                          45,383               22,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 11,346                6,926
<CGS>                                 0                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    10,000                8,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (1,464)                (616)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (118)              (1,353)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  (1,623)                   0
<CHANGES>                             0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,741)              (1,353)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.14)               (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.14)               (0.11)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 18 September 2008, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, parks and memorials.

                    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our Web site:                     *http://www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address, or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated in Washington, DC, August 28, 2008.

Thomas Luebke,

AIA, Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-20522 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ajay Bansal, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Complete Genomics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Complete Genomics, Inc.



|    |  |                                    
|--- |  | -----------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/  Ajay Bansal                   
|    |  | Name:   Ajay Bansal                
|    |  | Title:      Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 30, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Potomac Edison Company
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             187
<SECURITIES>                                       200
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,973
<INVENTORY>                                     42,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,727
<PP&E>                                       2,346,707
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,022,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,611,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,292
<BONDS>                                        593,534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       447,700
<OTHER-SE>                                     219,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,611,959
<SALES>                                        188,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,604
<CGS>                                          116,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,047
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All common stock is owned by parent, no EPS required.
</FN>


</TABLE>
188 La. 430

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jacques WEIL.

No. 34550.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 2, 1937.

J. B. Nachman, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and A. V. Hundley, Dist. Atty., and Ben. F. Thompson, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Alexandria, for the State.

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant, Jacques Weil, appeals from his conviction and sentence for violating an ordinance of the police jury of Rapides parish adopted on January 15, 1935. The appeal is supported by bills of exception reserved by defendant to the overruling of his motions to quash, for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, in each of which he assailed the constitutionality and legality of the ordinance.

The issues in the case are identical with the issues in the case of State v. Roy Reed, 177 So. 252, of this court, this day decided.

For the reasons assigned in the case of State v. Reed, supra, the conviction and sentence herein appealed from are annulled, the motion to quash is sustained, and defendant is ordered discharged.

HIGGINS, J., takes no part
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Lim, Chief Financial Officer of Quincy Energy Corp.
(the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

1.      The Annual Report on Form
  10-KSB, of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with
  the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange
  Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      The information contained
in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 25, 2006



/s/ George Lim George Lim Chief Financial Officer

---
TABLE 6
DIFFUSION INDEXES OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
-----------------------------------------------------------------


   Series Title                    Series Code       
------------------------------------------------------------------
 
One Month Earlier                   DIFFUSION_1
Three Months Earlier                DIFFUSION_3
Six Months Earlier                  DIFFUSION_6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           8,543
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,153
<PP&E>                                         515,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 298,949
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          275,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,435)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,160
<SALES>                                         23,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,708
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)
        

</TABLE>
#### Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent, v Leonisa Cusi, Respondent, and Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The doctrine of waiver precludes an insurer from disclaiming coverage under an insurance policy where the insurer, with knowledge that there is a ground to void policy, nonetheless acts in recognition of the validity of the policy *(see, Titus v Glens Falls Ins. Co.,*81 NY 410, 419; *Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co.,*91 AD2d 31, 33-35, and cases cited therein). Applying that doctrine to this case, we find that Nationwide waived its right to disclaim when it participated in the intercompany property damage arbitration on behalf of its insured and conceded coverage of the offending vehicle. Thus, the court properly found the disclaimer invalid. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Wager, J.—arbitration.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with Amendment No. 1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of
      Maxco, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Lawrence O. Fields, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: 
      February 20, 2007


/s/ Lawrence
              O. FieldsLawrence
              O. FieldsChief
              Financial Officer









A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Michael Shenher, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Clean Power Concepts, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ Michael Shenher


Michael Shenher


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer





August 13, 2010








A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONAL
PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                              82,677
<SECURITIES>                                       136,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         20,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   248,390
<PP&E>                                              25,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                      12,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     272,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               33,999
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             7,441
<OTHER-SE>                                         230,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       272,322
<SALES>                                             18,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    18,507
<CGS>                                               13,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       13,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                           560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.42



</TABLE>
#### Wilford C. MATHIS, Appellant, v. Sarah J. MATHIS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

Feb. 19, 1954.

Rehearing Denied April 2,1954.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 6, 2013

p1030 

# Order

Clerk November 6, 2013

146917

VALERIE ROHDE, Personal Representative

for the Estate of HENRY C. ROHDE,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146917

COA: 308773

GOPI NALLANI, M.D., ADVANCED Arenac CC: 11

- 011675

- NH

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, P.C., BRENT J.

RAAP, D.O., BRENT J. RAPP, D.O., P.C.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

STANDISH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.

d/b /a ST. MARY’S OF MICHIGAN STANDISH

HOSPITAL,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

NORTHERN BAY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.,

and DORAISAMY VENKITAPATHY, M.D.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7047 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act with respect to the 

determination by the Secretary regarding certain biosimilar application 

elements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2022 

Mr. SCHRADER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act with 

respect to the determination by the Secretary regarding 

certain biosimilar application elements, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lowering Costs by Im5 proving Biosimilar Uptake Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7047 IH

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION BY SECRETARY REGARDING CER2 TAIN BIOSIMILAR APPLICATION ELEMENTS. 

3 Section 351(k)(2)(A)(ii) of the Public Health Service 

4 Act (262(k)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(ii) DETERMINATION BY SECRETARY

6 REGARDING CERTAIN APPLICATION ELE7 MENTS.— 

8 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—The Sec9 retary may determine, in the Sec10 retary’s discretion, that an element 

11 described in clause (i)(I), or in clause 

12 (i)(IV) with respect to the strength of 

13 a biological product, is unnecessary in 

14 an application submitted under this 

15 subsection. 

16 ‘‘(II) USE OF DETERMINATION.— 

17 If the Secretary makes a determina18 tion under this clause that informa19 tion demonstrating that the strength 

20 of the biological product is the same 

21 as that of the reference product as de22 scribed in clause (i)(IV) is unneces23 sary, the term ‘reference product’ 

24 shall, for purposes of this section with 

25 respect to such biological product, inVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:49 Mar 15, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7047.IH H7047

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7047 IH

1 clude all applicable strengths of the 

2 reference product.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-152100 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-137707 and 333-145869 on Form S-8 of our report dated November 21, 2003, except for the second paragraph of the report as
to which the date is May 15, 2006, relating to the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders equity (deficiency in assets) and cash flows for the period from February 9, 2000 (date of
inception) to December 31, 2002 (not separately presented), which report appears in the ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limiteds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|Seattle, Washington           
|March 21, 2011