SPECIAL NOTICE

The operational requirements referenced in this solicitation were updated on January 20, 2015. 

The updated operational requirements are available 

at http://www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/pages/forensic-operational-requirements.aspx.

To assist applicants in completing their proposals, NIJ has made FAQs available for this funding 

opportunity. Visit http://nij.gov/funding/pages/solicitation-qa.aspx#sl0011 for questions and 

answers to help prepare your application.

For further assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, please 

contact forensic.research@usdoj.gov.
U.S. Department of Justice OMB No. 1121-0329

Office of Justice Programs Approval Expires 07/31/2016

National Institute of Justice

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) is seeking applications for funding of basic or applied research and development in 

forensic science for criminal justice purposes. This program furthers the Department’s mission 

by sponsoring research to provide objective, independent, evidence-based knowledge and tools 

to meet the challenges of criminal justice, particularly at the State and local levels. NIJ’s 

Forensic Science Technology Working Group (TWG) assists in identifying and prioritizing 

operational needs and requirements of the field. The operational requirements discussed at the 

FY 2014 meeting may be found at the following link and are intended to facilitate your proposal 

development: www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/pages/fy14-twg-operational-requirements.aspx

Research and Development in Forensic Science 

for Criminal Justice Purposes

Eligibility

In general, NIJ is authorized to make grants to, or enter into contracts or cooperative 

agreements with, States (including territories), units of local government (including federally 

recognized Indian tribal governments as determined by the Secretary of the Interior), nonprofit 

and for-profit organizations (including tribal nonprofit or for-profit organizations), institutions of 

higher education (including tribal institutions of higher education), and certain qualified 

individuals. For-profit organizations must agree to forgo any profit or management fee. NIJ may 

also enter into interagency agreements with Federal entities in appropriate cases. Foreign 

governments, foreign organizations, and foreign institutions of higher education are not eligible 

to apply.

NIJ welcomes applications that involve two or more entities, however, one eligible entity must 

be the applicant and the other(s) must be proposed as subrecipient(s). The applicant must be 

the entity with primary responsibility for conducting and leading the research. If successful, the 

applicant will be responsible for monitoring and appropriately managing any subrecipients or, as 

applicable, for administering any procurement subcontracts that would receive federal program 

funds from the applicant under the award.

An eligible applicant may submit more than one application, as long as each application 

proposes a different project in response to the solicitation. (Applicants should also review and 

consider the “Duplicate Applications” note under How to Apply in Section D. Application and 

Submission Information.) Subrecipients may be part of multiple proposals.

NIJ may elect to make awards for applications submitted under this solicitation in future fiscal 

years, dependent on the merit of the applications and on the availability of appropriations.

For additional eligibility information, see Section C. Eligibility Information.
2 NIJ-2015-3985

Deadline

Applicants must register with Grants.gov prior to submitting an application. All applications are 

due to be submitted and in receipt of a successful validation message in Grants.gov by 

11:59 p.m. eastern time on April 8, 2015.

All applicants are encouraged to read this Important Notice: Applying for Grants in 

Grants.gov.

For additional information, see How to Apply in Section D. Application and Submission 

Information.

Contact Information

For technical assistance with submitting an application, contact the Grants.gov Customer 

Support Hotline at 800-518-4726 or 606-545-5035, or via e-mail to support@grants.gov.

The Grants.gov Support Hotline hours of operation are 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except 

federal holidays.

Applicants that experience unforeseen Grants.gov technical issues beyond their control that 

prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must e-mail the NIJ contact 

identified below within 24 hours after the application deadline and request approval to 

submit their application. Additional information on reporting technical issues is found under 

“Experiencing Unforeseen Grants.gov Technical Issues” in the How to Apply section.

For assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, 

contact forensic.research@usdoj.gov. General information on applying for NIJ awards can be 

found at www.nij.gov/funding/Pages/welcome.aspx. Answers to frequently asked questions that 

may assist applicants are posted at www.nij.gov/funding/Pages/faqs.aspx.

Grants.gov number assigned to this announcement: NIJ-2015-3985

Release date: January 8, 2015

SL001149
3 NIJ-2015-3985

Contents

A. Program Description.................................................................................................................4

Overview ...................................................................................................................................4

Program-Specific Information....................................................................................................4

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products .........................................6

B. Federal Award Information .....................................................................................................10

Type of Award .........................................................................................................................11

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls.........................................................11

Budget Information ..................................................................................................................12

Cost Sharing or Match Requirement .......................................................................................13

Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals...............................................................................................13

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver...............................13

Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs ...................14

Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) ...................................................14

C. Eligibility Information ..............................................................................................................14

Cost Sharing or Match Requirement .......................................................................................15

Limit on Number of Application Submissions ..........................................................................15

D. Application and Submission Information ................................................................................15

What an Application Should Include........................................................................................15

How to Apply ...........................................................................................................................25

E. Application Review Information ..............................................................................................28

Selection Criteria .....................................................................................................................28

Review Process.......................................................................................................................30

F. Federal Award Administration Information..............................................................................31

Federal Award Notices ............................................................................................................31

Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements..............................................31

General Information About Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements..............................32

G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) ....................................................................................34

H. Other Information ...................................................................................................................34

Provide Feedback to OJP .......................................................................................................34

Application Checklist ...............................................................................................................36
4 NIJ-2015-3985

Research and Development in Forensic Science 

for Criminal Justice Purposes

(CFDA No. 16.560)

A. Program Description

Overview

With this solicitation, NIJ seeks proposals for basic or applied research and development 

projects that will: (1) increase the body of knowledge to guide and inform forensic science policy 

and practice or (2) result in the production of useful materials, devices, systems, or methods 

that have the potential for forensic application. The intent of this program is to direct the findings 

of basic scientific research, research and development in broader scientific fields applicable to 

forensic science, and ongoing forensic science research toward the development of highly 

discriminating, accurate, reliable, cost-effective, and rapid methods for the identification, 

analysis, and interpretation of physical evidence for criminal justice purposes. The operational 

needs and requirements discussed at NIJ’s FY 2014 Forensic Science Technology Working 

Group (TWG) meeting may be found at the following link and are intended to assist you in your 

proposal development: www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/pages/fy14-twg-operationalrequirements.aspx

Authorizing Legislation: Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 

(sections 201 and 202); Homeland Security Act (sections 231-233); Department of Justice 

Appropriations Act, 2015; 28 U.S.C. 530C.

Program-Specific Information

This solicitation seeks applications for funding to support basic or applied research and 

development forensic science projects. For the purposes of this solicitation, the following 

definitions apply:

• Forensic—Of, relating to, or used in legal proceedings or argumentation.1

• Science—The observation, identification, description, experimental investigations, and 

theoretical explanation of natural phenomena.2

• Basic research—A systematic study directed toward fuller knowledge or understanding 

of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts without specific 

applications towards processes or products in mind. Basic research may include 

activities with broad applications in mind.3 (For the purposes of this solicitation, basic 

research must include activities with broad application to forensic sciences related to the 

criminal justice system.) 

 1 The definition of “forensic” is taken from Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary. 2 The definition of “science” is taken from Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary. 3 Definition is taken from: OMB Circular A–11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget, Section 84—

Character Classification (Schedule C). 
5 NIJ-2015-3985

• Applied research—A systematic study to gain knowledge or understanding necessary 

to determine the means by which a recognized and specific need may be met.4 (For the 

purposes of this solicitation, the specific need(s) being met must relate to the 

improvement of forensic science services for criminal justice purposes.) 

• Development—The systematic application of knowledge or understanding, directed 

toward the production of useful materials, devices, and systems or methods, including 

design, development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes to meet 

specific requirements.5 (For the purposes of this solicitation, the development of forensic 

technologies and methods should assist in answering questions posed in criminal 

investigations or increase crime laboratory capacity to meet the demand for forensic 

science services.)

Proposals are expected to identify the forensic science discipline(s) intended to benefit from the 

project. The forensic science discipline(s) should be listed in the key words on the title 

page. Some of the forensic science disciplines are listed below (where available, links have also 

been provided to sites containing additional information). 

• DNA and forensic biology (www.dna.gov, www.cstl.nist.gov/strbase, www.swgdam.org). 

• Forensic crime scene analysis (www.swgstain.org). 

• Forensic anthropology and forensic odontology (www.swganth.org). 

• Controlled substances (www.swgdrug.org). 

• Fire debris analysis and arson scene investigations (www.ncfs.ucf.edu/twgfex). 

• Firearms and toolmark identification (www.swggun.org). 

• Latent print (www.swgfast.org).

• Shoeprint/tire tread examination (www.swgtread.org). 

• Questioned documents (www.swgdoc.org). 

• Trace evidence (www.swgmat.org). 

• Forensic toxicology (www.swgtox.org). 

• Medicolegal death investigations, including forensic pathology (www.swgmdi.org).

NIJ will also accept proposals that include an examination of human factors as they relate to 

one of the forensic science disciplines listed above. Such proposals must relate directly to the 

forensic examiner and/or the identification, testing, collection, and interpretation of physical 

evidence.

 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid.
6 NIJ-2015-3985

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products

NIJ’s Research and Development in Forensic Science for Criminal Justice Purposes Program is 

intended to meet the following goals and objectives. Proposals should address at least one of 

these goals. Proposed projects that address more than one goal should be separated into 

discrete phases that clearly identify the goal to be addressed by each phase (additional 

information regarding the phasing of proposals can be found in Section B. Federal Award 

Information.

• Fundamental/Basic Research Goal: Improve the understanding of the accuracy, 

reliability, and measurement validity of forensic science disciplines. Applicants may refer 

to “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, National 

Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, February 

2009”

6 to review research recommendations put forth by the Committee. To achieve this 

goal, projects should meet at least one of the following objectives: 

o Conduct basic scientific research in the physical, life, and cognitive sciences that is 

designed to increase the knowledge underlying forensic science disciplines intended 

for use in the criminal justice system. For the purposes of this objective, basic 

research studies proposed must include activities with broad application to forensic 

sciences related to the criminal justice system; proposals should describe the 

anticipated impact of the study on one or more forensic science disciplines. 

o Perform studies that examine the degree of accuracy and reliability of methods used 

by forensic scientists to achieve a more complete understanding of the scientific 

basis of forensic evidence and the interpretation of that evidence. Studies also may 

examine various processes within forensic methods, from the initial acceptance and 

examination of evidence for its probative value and quality, to the final interpretation 

of forensic results, including assessment of error rate. 

o Conduct research studies designed to further the understanding of quantifiable 

measures of uncertainty in the conclusions of forensic analyses, regardless of the 

sources of uncertainty. Studies should seek to establish limits of reliability and 

accuracy that forensic methods can achieve with respect to varying conditions of 

forensic evidence. 

o Develop new approaches to forensic analysis, including quantitation of analyses that 

are currently qualitative in nature (e.g., in the development of quantitative studies 

related to friction ridge analysis or other impression and pattern evidence). 

• Applied Research Goal: Increase knowledge or understanding necessary to guide 

criminal justice policy and practice related to the forensic sciences. To achieve this goal, 

projects should meet at least one of the following objectives: 

o Perform applied research to increase knowledge of physical evidence and/or its 

behavior. Examples include, but are not limited to, the study of fluid transfer and fluid 

dynamics of certain biological fluids (e.g., blood) to increase understanding of 

patterns deposited at crime scenes; the examination of chemical properties of 

evidence for the purpose of identifying source materials; studies of the behavior of 

 6 www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf
7 NIJ-2015-3985

chemical compounds of forensic interest in biological systems; research to better 

understand aged, degraded, limited, damaged, inhibited, or otherwise compromised 

physical evidence (e.g., studies on the effect of environmental factors on physical 

evidence; studies to increase the overall understanding of the processes and 

mechanisms that result in the inability to obtain analytical results from evidence). 

o Perform evaluation studies of technologies that are expected to have application to 

forensic sciences in criminal justice settings. The purpose of an evaluation must be 

to test a new, modified, or previously untested technology to determine whether it is 

effective for forensic science application. Proposals for evaluation studies should 

systematically use scientific methods to measure efficiency, implementation, and 

utility of the technology being evaluated. The primary intent of a proposed evaluation 

study must be to generate new knowledge or contribute to the knowledge in the 

forensic scientific literature. Furthermore, knowledge gained from an evaluation study 

should be applicable to sites other than the one(s) being evaluated. An evaluation 

study should result in a report suitable for publication and dissemination to guide 

criminal justice policy and/or practice related to the forensic sciences. The results of 

an evaluation study should contribute to generalizable knowledge that can be 

applied beyond a particular program/geography and can inform other 

researchers, practitioners, and/or policymakers.

• Development Goal: Produce novel and useful materials, devices, systems, or methods 

that have the potential for forensic application for criminal justice purposes. For 

development projects, proposals should demonstrate potential for increased quality of 

result and/or decreased time/cost for forensic analyses as compared to current standard 

practices. In order to achieve this goal, projects should meet at least one of the following 

objectives: 

o Improve the “front end” of the forensic analysis processes. Examples include, but are 

not limited to, the development of improved methods for detection and identification 

of evidence at crime scenes, the development of improved screening methods to 

help assess the probative value of physical evidence (i.e., onsite presumptive and/or 

confirmatory analysis of evidence), the development of improved means to remotely 

detect forensic evidence at a crime scene to overcome scene hazards and prevent 

evidence contamination, the development of nondestructive or minimally destructive 

methods for evidentiary sample identification and/or collection, and the development 

of improved tools or methods for evidence preservation and/or storage. 

o Develop instrumental systems to improve analysis throughput and the reliability, 

reproducibility, selectivity, and/or sensitivity of current methods used in crime 

laboratories for forensic analysis.

o Develop tools or methods that can separate the various components of a mixture. 

The separation method must be successful on typical forensic samples (limited in 

yield, etc.) and must not reduce the efficiency of downstream forensic methods. 

Examples of mixtures include, but are not limited to, cells from different sources 

(e.g., sperm cells from female epithelial cells, epithelial cells from different sources), 

products of DNA processes (e.g., polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in 

mixtures from two or more individuals), and trace materials. 
8 NIJ-2015-3985

o Develop improved tools for examining aged, degraded, limited, damaged, inhibited, 

or otherwise compromised physical evidence. Examples include, but are not limited 

to, the development of tools to determine the condition of the evidence to assist 

crime laboratory analysts in selecting the appropriate analytical approach, the 

development of methods to repair damaged evidence (without compromising sample 

integrity) to increase the likelihood of obtaining an analytical result, improvements to 

the methods for detection and/or removal or remediation of substances that inhibit 

the success of analysis, or other methods that will maximize the success rate of the 

analysis of compromised evidence. 

o Develop novel approaches to forensic science methods for analysis and 

interpretation. Examples include streamlined, portable, high-throughput, more 

informative, more sensitive, less susceptible to inhibition, and other novel methods 

for analysis of physical evidence for criminal justice purposes. 

o Develop novel approaches and/or enhance current approaches to interpret forensic 

data derived from physical evidence, including an assessment of the significance of 

association. This may include development of databases (comprehensive, 

searchable, easily accessible, secure databases for use in determining the statistical 

strength of analytical results obtained from evidence found at crime scenes) and/or 

analyses that provide quantitative measures and statistical evaluation of forensic 

evidence. 

In addition to required data sets, a draft and final summary overview of research results, interim 

and final progress and financial reports,7 NIJ expects scholarly products to result from each 

award under this solicitation, taking the form of one or more published, peer-reviewed, scientific 

journal articles, and/or (if appropriate) law review journal articles, book chapter(s) or book(s) in 

the academic press, technological prototypes, patented inventions, or similar scientific products.

Some projects may be chosen for technology evaluation or technology transition activities. More 

information, including examples of previous workshops and evaluations, can be found through 

the following links: www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/lab-operations/Pages/workshops.aspx

and www.forensiccoe.org/KT/techtransfer.aspx.

NIJ encourages researchers to seek guidance from or partner with crime laboratories. Such 

associations foster a greater understanding of the issues unique to the field of forensic science 

and may strengthen the scope of the proposed research plan. 

Information on NIJ’s forensic science research and development programs (including previously 

funded projects) can be found at: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/topics/forensics/welcome.htm.

New Investigator Opportunities

NIJ is interested in funding new investigators in forensic science research as it pertains to NIJ’s 

mission. Proposals whose principal investigator and any co-principal investigator(s) are defined 

as “new investigators” may, in appropriate circumstances, be given special consideration in 

award decisions.

 7 See “Federal Award Administration Information” (“General Information About Post-Federal Award Reporting 

Requirements”) section of this solicitation, below, for additional information.
9 NIJ-2015-3985

To be considered a “new investigator” for purposes of this solicitation, one of the two sets of 

criteria below must be demonstrated and the applicant should identify the principal 

investigator(s) as “new investigator(s)” on the title page of the proposal:

• The investigator must have received, no earlier than April 1, 2011, an initial appointment 

in the United States to a full-time junior faculty position at a university or to an equivalent 

full-time staff scientist position in a research institution; hold such a full-time appointment 

at the time of application submission; and must never have received NIJ funding for a 

research project, other than a Graduate Research Fellowship program grant. (Typically, 

the appropriate faculty rank is that of Assistant Professor, although some institutions 

may use a different title to designate junior faculty status.)

• The investigator must be an established researcher who has not successfully competed 

for NIJ funding as a principal investigator, co-principal investigator, or collaborative 

researcher in the past 10 years. The investigator must hold a full-time appointment in the 

United States to a faculty position at a university or an equivalent position as a scientist 

on the staff of a research institution at the time of application submission.

In the case of a grant application that involves more than one investigator, all investigators 

must meet the definition of “new investigator” in order for the application to be 

considered as one from a “new investigator.”

Innovative Areas of Research Opportunities

NIJ is interested in funding innovative research in developing fields, as applied to the forensic 

sciences. Proposals that contribute to the following national research initiatives may be given 

special consideration in award decisions:

• Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology is the understanding and control of matter at 

dimensions between approximately 1 and 100 nanometers (nm), where unique 

phenomena enable novel applications. Encompassing nanoscale science, engineering, 

and technology, nanotechnology involves imaging, measuring, modeling, and 

manipulating matter at this length scale8

. The National Nanotechnology Initiative is a 

U.S. Government research and development initiative to understand and control matter 

at the nanoscale, intended to revolutionize technology and industry to benefit society. 

NIJ is interested in funding proposals that employ nanotechnology to advance the 

forensic science disciplines. Information on the National Nanotechnology Initiative can 

be found at: www.nano.gov/

• Microbiome: Microscopic study of the human body has shown that microbial cells 

outnumber human cells by about ten to one. Until recently though, this abundant 

community of human-associated microbes remained largely unstudied. The National 

Institutes of Health Common Fund Human Microbiome Project (HMP) was established to 

study the human microbiome9

. There are many applications to studying the microbiome 

for forensic purposes. A well-known application is the estimation of time since death by 

recording the change in the microbiome over a known period of time; however, the study 

of the microbiome for other forensic purposes is encouraged. NIJ is interested in funding

proposals investigating the microbiome for forensic applications beyond postmortem 

 8 www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/2014_nni_strategic_plan.pdf 9 www.commonfund.nih.gov/hmp/overview
10 NIJ-2015-3985

interval (i.e., time since death) determination. Such applications may be related to trace 

evidence, cause of death, or human identification, among others. Information on the 

National Institutes of Health Human Microbiome Project can be found 

at: www.commonfund.nih.gov/hmp/index

• Fatal Head Trauma: The BRAIN Initiative is a “research effort to revolutionize our 

understanding of the human mind...”10. NIJ is interested in funding proposals 

investigating the human brain for forensic applications. Such applications may include 

cause of death determination, pediatric head trauma assessment, or sudden and 

unexplained death in infant and adults. Information on the BRAIN Initiative can be found 

at: www.whitehouse.gov/share/brain-initiative

B. Federal Award Information

Total funding for this solicitation and the number of awards made will depend on the availability 

of funds, the quality of the applications, and other pertinent factors. In fiscal year 2014, NIJ 

provided over $20 million in grants to fund research and development projects related to 

forensic science, including DNA. NIJ funding for an individual research or development project 

rarely exceeds $500,000 annually, although total funding for projects requiring multiple years to 

complete has exceeded $1 million in some cases. In FY 2014, the average forensic science 

research and development award was approximately $206,808 per year, and the average 

project period was 2 years. 

To allow time for, among other things, any necessary post-award review, modification, and 

clearance by OJP of the proposed budget, applicants should propose an award start date of 

January 1, 2016. 

If the applicant is proposing a project that reasonably could be conducted in discrete phases, 

with each phase resulting in completion of one or more significant, defined milestones, then NIJ

strongly recommends that the applicant structure the application – specifically including the 

narrative, expected scholarly products, timelines/milestones, and budget detail worksheet and 

budget narrative – to clearly set out each phase. Given limitations on the availability to NIJ of 

funds for research, development, and evaluation awards, this information will assist NIJ in 

considering whether partial funding of proposals that would not receive full funding would be 

productive. (If NIJ elects to fund only certain phases of a proposed project in FY 2015, the 

expected scholarly products from the partial-funding award may, in some cases, vary from those 

described above.)

NIJ may, in certain cases, provide supplemental funding in future years to awards under its 

research, development, and evaluation solicitations. Important considerations in decisions 

regarding supplemental funding include, among other factors, the availability of funding, 

strategic priorities, NIJ’s assessment of the quality of the management of the award (for 

example, timeliness and quality of progress reports), and NIJ’s assessment of the progress of 

the work funded under the award. 

All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or 

additional requirements that may be imposed by law.

 10 www.whitehouse.gov/share/brain-initiative
11 NIJ-2015-3985

Type of Award11

NIJ expects that it will make any award from this solicitation in the form of a cooperative 

agreement, which is a particular type of grant used if NIJ expects to have ongoing substantial 

involvement in award activities. Substantial involvement includes direct oversight and 

involvement with the grantee organization in implementation of the grant, but does not involve 

day-to-day project management. See Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal 

Requirements, under Section F. Federal Award Administration Information, for details regarding 

the federal involvement anticipated under an award from this solicitation. (Any funds provided to 

another federal agency will be handled in a different manner.)

As discussed later in the solicitation, important rules (including limitations) apply to any 

conference/meeting/training costs under cooperative agreements.

Please note: Any recipient of an award under this solicitation will be required to comply with 

Department of Justice regulations on confidentiality and human subjects’ protection. See 

“Evidence, Research, and Evaluation Guidance and Requirements” under “Solicitation 

Requirements” in the OJP Funding Resource Center.

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls

If selected for funding, the award recipient must:

a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides 

reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in 

compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal 

award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for 

Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the 

United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee 

of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

b) Comply with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal 

awards.

c) Evaluate and monitor the non-federal entity's compliance with statute, regulations and 

the terms and conditions of federal awards.

d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including 

noncompliance identified in audit findings.

e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information 

and other information the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as 

sensitive or the non-federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable federal, 

State and local laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality.

In order to better understand administrative requirements and cost principles, award applicants 

are encouraged to enroll, at no charge, in the Department of Justice Grants Financial 

Management Online Training available here.

 11 See generally 31 U.S.C. §§ 6301-6305 (defines and describes various forms of federal assistance relationships, 

including grants and cooperative agreements (a type of grant)). 
12 NIJ-2015-3985

Budget Information

What will not be funded:

• Proposals that are not responsive to this specific solicitation. This includes: 

o Proposals that do not contain a research component or do not respond to the 

specific goals of this solicitation. 

o Proposals that do not clearly address criminal justice concerns in the United States. 

• Proposals primarily to purchase equipment, materials, or supplies. (A budget may 

include these items if they are necessary to conduct research, development, 

demonstration, evaluation, or analysis. Proposals that include equipment purchases 

should include a discussion of how federally-funded equipment is proposed to be used 

after the funded work has been completed and/or the project period has ended. Note 

that OJP may issue specific equipment disposition instructions in appropriate 

circumstances.)

• Provision of training or direct service.

• Proposals in the area of digital evidence or digital forensics. Digital evidence includes 

information stored or transmitted in binary form that may be relied on in court. It is 

typically found on computer hard drives, mobile phones, personal digital assistants, 

CDs/DVDs, flash memory equipment and other electronic devices. Digital evidence is 

commonly associated with electronic crime (e.g., child pornography or credit card fraud); 

however, digital evidence can also be used as forensic evidence in other types of 

crimes.8 Applicants proposing projects in the areas of digital evidence or digital forensics 

may consider submitting applications to the planned FY 2015 NIJ solicitation entitled, 

Development of Improved Tools and Methods for Acquiring, Processing, and Storing 

Digital Evidence.

• Proposals that focus primarily on crimes directly related to nonhuman animals. (A project 

may include nonhuman animals, if a) they are necessary to conduct the proposed 

research [e.g., the use of animals or other organisms for experimental modeling], or b) 

the nonhuman biological components are analogous to the physical evidence that would 

be examined in criminal investigations involving human suspects and victims).

• Proposals focusing on the estimation of postmortem interval (i.e. time since death) 

whose research design is not novel nor applicable across the geography. The primary 

intent of these studies must be to generate new knowledge or contribute to the 

knowledge in the forensic scientific literature that is applicable to locations other than the 

one(s) being evaluated.

• Proposals that focus on predicting the behavior of criminal offenders or indicators that 

result in victimization. 

• Proposals that seek to administer surveys on the perceptions of physical evidence 

collection policies among evidence examiners. 
13 NIJ-2015-3985

• Proposals that focus on legal factors involved in how physical evidence is processed. 

• Proposals for social science research whose primary focus is not identification, 

collection, testing and interpretation of physical evidence. 

• Proposals focused on criminal psychology. 

• Proposals involving the use of canines, (e.g. detector dogs). 

• Proposals on voice authentication. 

• Proposals on deception detection. 

• Costs associated with conducting conferences. A conference is a symposium, seminar, 

workshop, or any other organized and formal meeting, whether conducted face-to-face 

or via the Internet, where individuals assemble (or meet virtually) to exchange 

information and views or explore or clarify a defined subject, problem, or area of 

knowledge, whether or not a published report results from such meeting. A meeting 

where a gathering discusses general matters as part of a normal course of doing 

business is not considered a conference. Funds may be used to attend conferences for 

the purposes of dissemination of research findings. 

Cost Sharing or Match Requirement

See “Cofunding” paragraph under item 4 (“Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative”) 

under What an Application Should Include in Section D. Application and Submission 

Information. 

Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals

OJP does not typically approve pre-agreement costs; an applicant must request and obtain the 

prior written approval of OJP for all such costs. If approved, pre-agreement costs could be paid 

from grant funds consistent with a grantee’s approved budget, and under applicable cost 

standards. However, all such costs prior to award and prior to approval of the costs are incurred 

at the sole risk of an applicant. Generally, no applicant should incur project costs before

submitting an application requesting federal funding for those costs. Should there be 

extenuating circumstances that appear to be appropriate for OJP’s consideration as preagreement costs, the applicant should contact the point of contact listed on the title page of this 

announcement for details on the requirements for submitting a written request for approval. See 

the section on Costs Requiring Prior Approval in the Financial Guide, for more information.

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver

With respect to any award of more than $250,000 made under this solicitation, recipients may 

not use federal funds to pay total cash compensation (salary plus cash bonuses) to any 

employee of the award recipient at a rate that exceeds 110% of the maximum annual salary 

payable to a member of the Federal Government’s Senior Executive Service (SES) at an 
14 NIJ-2015-3985

agency with a Certified SES Performance Appraisal System for that year.12 The 2014 salary 

table for SES employees is available at www.opm.gov/pay-leave. Note: A recipient may 

compensate an employee at a greater rate, provided the amount in excess of this compensation 

limitation is paid with non-federal funds. (Any such additional compensation will not be 

considered matching funds where match requirements apply.)

The Director of the National Institute of Justice may exercise discretion to waive, on an 

individual basis, the limitation on compensation rates allowable under an award. An applicant 

requesting a waiver should include a detailed justification in the budget narrative of the 

application. Unless the applicant submits a waiver request and justification with the application, 

the applicant should anticipate that OJP will request the applicant to adjust and resubmit the 

budget.

The justification should include the particular qualifications and expertise of the individual, the 

uniqueness of the service the individual will provide, the individual’s specific knowledge of the 

program or project being undertaken with award funds, and a statement explaining that the 

individual’s salary is commensurate with the regular and customary rate for an individual with 

his/her qualifications and expertise, and for the work to be done.

Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs

OJP strongly encourages applicants that propose to use award funds for any conference-, 

meeting-, or training-related activity to review carefully – before submitting an application – the 

OJP policy and guidance on “conference” approval, planning, and reporting available 

at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/PostawardRequirements/chapter15page1.htm. OJP policy and 

guidance (1) encourage minimization of conference, meeting, and training costs; (2) require 

prior written approval (which may affect project timelines) of most such costs for cooperative 

agreement recipients and of some such costs for grant recipients; and (3) set cost limits, 

including a general prohibition of all food and beverage costs.

Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable)

If an applicant proposes a program or activity that would deliver services or benefits to 

individuals, the costs of taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to those services 

or benefits for individuals with limited English proficiency may be allowable. Reasonable steps 

to provide meaningful access to services or benefits may include interpretation or translation 

services where appropriate.

For additional information, see the "Civil Rights Compliance" section under “Solicitation 

Requirements” in the OJP Funding Resource Center.

C. Eligibility Information

Eligibility

For additional eligibility information, see Title page.

 12 This limitation on use of award funds does not apply to the non-profit organizations specifically named at Appendix 

VIII to 2 C.F.R. Part 200.
15 NIJ-2015-3985

Cost Sharing or Match Requirement

For additional information on cost sharing and match requirement, see Section B. Federal 

Award Information.

Limit on Number of Application Submissions

If an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, NIJ will review only the most 

recent system-validated version submitted. For more information on system-validated versions, 

see How to Apply.

D. Application and Submission Information

What an Application Should Include

Applicants should anticipate that if they fail to submit an application that contains all of the 

specified elements, it may affect negatively the review of their application; and, should a 

decision be made to make an award, it may result in the inclusion of special conditions that 

preclude the recipient from accessing or using award funds pending satisfaction of the 

conditions.

Moreover, applicants should anticipate that applications determined to be nonresponsive to the 

scope of the solicitation, or that do not include the application elements that NIJ has designated 

to be critical, will neither proceed to peer review nor receive further consideration. Under this 

solicitation, NIJ has designated the following application elements as critical: Program Narrative, 

Budget Detail Worksheet, Budget Narrative, and resumes/curriculum vitae of key personnel. For 

purposes of this solicitation, “key personnel” means the principal investigator, and any and all 

co-principal investigators. Please review the “Note on File Names and File Types” under How to 

Apply to be sure applications are submitted in permitted formats.

OJP strongly recommends that applicants use appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., 

“Program Narrative,” “Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative,” “Timelines,” 

“Memoranda of Understanding,” “Resumes”) for all attachments. Also, OJP recommends that 

applicants include resumes in a single file.

1. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424)

The SF-424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for submission of preapplications, applications, and related information. Grants.gov and OJP’s Grants 

Management System (GMS) take information from the applicant’s profile to populate the 

fields on this form. When selecting "type of applicant," if the applicant is a for-profit entity, 

select "For-Profit Organization" or "Small Business" (as applicable).

Intergovernmental Review: This funding opportunity (program) is not subject to Executive 

Order 12372. (In completing the SF-424, applicants are to make the appropriate selection in 

response to question 19 to indicate that the “Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.”)
16 NIJ-2015-3985

2. Project Abstract

The project abstract is a very important part of the application, and serves as an introduction 

to the proposed project. NIJ uses the project abstract for a number of purposes, including 

assignment of the application to an appropriate review panel. If the application is funded, the 

project abstract typically will become public information and be used to describe the project. 

Applications should include a high-quality project abstract that summarizes the proposed 

project in 250-400 words. Project abstracts should be—

• Written for a general public audience.

• Submitted as a separate attachment with “Project Abstract” as part of its file name.

• Single-spaced, using a standard 12-point font (Times New Roman) with 1-inch margins.

As a separate attachment, the project abstract will not count against the page limit for the 

program narrative.

3. Program Narrative

The program narrative section of the application should not exceed 18 single-spaced pages 

in 12-point font with 1-inch margins, of which a minimum of 9 pages should be dedicated to 

the description of the project/program design and implementation. If included in the main 

body of the program narrative, tables, charts, figures, and other illustrations count toward 

the 18-page limit for the narrative section. The project abstract, table of contents, 

appendices, and government forms do not count toward the 18-page limit.

If the program narrative fails to comply with these length-related restrictions, NIJ may 

consider such noncompliance in peer review and in final award decisions.

The following sections should be included as part of the program narrative.13

Program Narrative Guidelines: 

a. Title Page (not counted against the 18-page program narrative limit).

The title page should include the title of the project, submission date, funding 

opportunity number, and the name and complete contact information (that is,

address, telephone number, and e-mail address) for both the applicant 

organization and the principal investigator, including “new investigator” status, as 

applicable.

 13 As noted earlier, if the proposed program or project reasonably could be conducted in discrete phases, with each 

phase resulting in completion of one or more significant, defined milestones, then NIJ strongly recommends that the 

applicant structure the application – specifically including the narrative, expected scholarly products, 

timelines/milestones, and budget detail worksheet and budget narrative – to set out each phase clearly. (In 

appropriate cases, the expected scholarly product(s) from a particular phase may vary from those described above.) 

See generally, “Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products” under “Program-Specific 

Information,” above.
17 NIJ-2015-3985

b. Resubmit Response (if applicable) (not counted against the 18-page program 

narrative limit).

If an applicant is resubmitting a proposal presented previously to NIJ, but not 

funded, the applicant should indicate this. A statement should be provided, no 

more than two pages, addressing: (1) the title, submission date, NIJ-assigned 

application number of the previous proposal, and (2) a brief summary of revisions 

to the proposal, including responses to previous feedback received from NIJ.

c. Table of Contents and Figures (not counted against 18-page program narrative 

limit).

d. Main Body.

The main body of the program narrative should describe the proposed project in 

depth. The following sections should be included as part of the program 

narrative: 

• Statement of the Problem.

• Project Design and Implementation. (This section should account for a 

minimum of 9 pages of the main body of the narrative).

• Potential Impact.

• Capabilities/Competencies.

Within these sections, the narrative should address:

• Purpose, goals, and objectives.

• Review of relevant literature.

• Detailed description of research design and methods, such as research 

questions, hypotheses, description of sample (sample types, sample 

collection methods, rationale for sample size, etc.), and analysis plan.

• Planned Scholarly Products (See Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and 

Expected Scholarly Products under Program-Specific Information, above, 

for a discussion of expected scholarly products.)

• Implications for criminal justice policy and practice in the United States.

• Management plan and organization.

• Plan for Dissemination to Broader Audiences (if applicable to the 

proposed project). Applicants should identify plans (if any) to produce or

to make available to broader interested audiences – such as 

criminal/juvenile justice practitioners or policymakers – summary 

information from the planned scholarly products of the proposed project 
18 NIJ-2015-3985

(such as summaries of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals), in a 

form designed to be readily accessible and useful to those audiences. 

(Such dissemination might include, for example, trade press articles and 

webinars.)

e. Appendices (not counted against the 18-page program narrative limit) include:

• Bibliography/references.

• Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps 

pertaining to the proposed project that are supplemental to such items 

included in the main body of the narrative. (Tables, charts, graphs, or other 

relevant illustrations that are essential for comprehension of the 

project/program design should be included in the main body of the narrative.)

• Supporting data—This should include any preliminary data to support the 

investigator’s ability to perform the work and/or proof of principle for the 

proposed research/technology. 

• Curriculum vitae or resumes of the principal investigator and any and all coprincipal investigators. In addition, curriculum vitae, resumes, or biographical 

sketches of all other individuals (regardless of “investigator” status) who will 

be significantly involved in substantive aspects of the proposal (including, for 

example, individuals such as statisticians serving as consultants to conduct

proposed data analysis).

• Documentation of “new investigator” status, if applicable.

• List (to the extent known) of all proposed project staff members, including 

those affiliated with the applicant organization or any proposed subrecipient 

organization(s), any proposed consultant(s) and contractors (whether 

individuals or organizations), and any proposed members of an advisory 

board for the project (if applicable). The list should include, for each individual 

and organization: name, title (if applicable), employer or other organizational

affiliation, and roles and responsibilities proposed for the project. Applicants 

should use the “Proposed Project Staff, Affiliation, and Roles” form available 

at www.nij.gov/funding/documents/nij-project-staff-template.xlsx to provide 

this listing.

• Proposed project timeline and expected milestones.

• Human Subjects Protection paperwork (documentation and forms related to 

Institutional Review Board (IRB) review). 

(See nij.gov/funding/humansubjects/Pages/welcome.aspx) NOTE: Final IRB 

approval is not required at the time an application is submitted.

• Privacy Certificate (for further guidance go 

to nij.gov/funding/humansubjects/pages/confidentiality.aspx).
19 NIJ-2015-3985

• List of any previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigator(s), including the NIJ-assigned award numbers and a brief 

description of any scholarly products that resulted in whole or in part from 

work funded under the NIJ award(s). (See “Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, 

and Expected Scholarly Products” under “Program-Specific Information,” 

above, for definition of “scholarly products.”)

• Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from 

organizations collaborating in the project, or letters of intent to establish 

agreements (if applicable).

• List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which this 

proposal has been submitted (if applicable).

• Data archiving plan. Applicants should anticipate that NIJ will require (through 

special award conditions, including a partial withholding of award funds) that 

data sets resulting in whole or in part from projects funded under this 

solicitation be submitted for archiving with the National Archive of Criminal 

Justice Data (NACJD) or to other appropriate public databases such as 

databases hosted by the National Center for Biotechnology Information 

(NCBI), forensically relevant population databases such as US Y-STR and 

EMPOP, or other potentially relevant databases listed at Nature Publishing 

Group’s open access online publication Scientific Data. (For a detailed 

discussion of the information NIJ expects to find in a data archiving plan, 

see www.nij.gov/funding/data-resources-program/applying/Pages/dataarchiving-strategies.aspx.)

Applications should include as an appendix a brief plan – labeled “Data 

Archiving Plan” – to comply with data archiving requirements. The plan 

should provide brief details about proposed data management and archiving,

including submission to NIJ of all files and documentation necessary to 

allow for future efforts by others to reproduce the project’s findings and/or to 

extend the scientific value of the data set through secondary analysis.

Pertinent files and documentation include, among other things, qualitative 

and quantitative data produced, instrumentation and data collection forms, 

codebook(s), any specialized programming code necessary to reproduce all 

constructed measures and the original data analysis, description of 

necessary de-identification procedures, and (when required) a copy of the 

privacy certificate and informed consent protocols. 

The plan should be one or two pages in length and include the level of effort 

associated with meeting archiving requirements.

Note that required data sets are to be submitted 90 days before the end of 

the project period.
20 NIJ-2015-3985

4. Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative

a. Budget Detail Worksheet 

A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found 

at www.ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/BudgetDetailWorksheet.pdf. Applicants that 

submit their budget in a different format should include the budget categories listed in 

the sample budget worksheet. (Work associated with satisfying data archiving 

requirements should be reflected.) NIJ expects applicants to provide a thorough 

narrative to each section of the Budget Detail Worksheet.

For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs,

see the Financial Guide at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm.

b. Budget Narrative

The budget narrative should thoroughly and clearly describe every category of expense 

listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. OJP expects proposed budgets to be complete,

cost effective, and allowable (e.g., reasonable, allocable, and necessary for project

activities).

Applicants should demonstrate in their budget narratives how they will maximize cost 

effectiveness of grant expenditures. Budget narratives should generally describe cost 

effectiveness in relation to potential alternatives and the goals of the project. For 

example, a budget narrative should detail why planned in-person meetings are 

necessary, or how technology and collaboration with outside organizations could be 

used to reduce costs, without compromising quality.

The narrative should be sound mathematically, and correspond with the information and 

figures provided in the Budget Detail Worksheet. The narrative should explain how the 

applicant estimated and calculated all costs, and how they are relevant to the completion 

of the proposed project. The narrative may include tables for clarification purposes but 

need not be in a spreadsheet format. As with the Budget Detail Worksheet, the Budget 

Narrative should be broken down by year.

c. Cofunding

An award made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 percent of the 

total cost of the project. The application should indicate whether it is feasible for the 

applicant to contribute cash, facilities, or services as non-federal support for the project. 

The application should identify generally any such contributions that the applicant 

expects to make and the proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, 

will be supported with non-federal contributions.

For additional match information, see the Cost Sharing or Match Requirement section 

under B. Federal Award Information.

If a successful application proposes a voluntary match amount, and OJP approves the 

budget, the total match amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes 

mandatory and subject to audit.
21 NIJ-2015-3985

d. Non-Competitive Procurement Contracts In Excess of Simplified Acquisition 

Threshold

If an applicant proposes to make one or more non-competitive procurements of products 

or services, where the non-competitive procurement will exceed the simplified 

acquisition threshold (also known as the small purchase threshold), which is currently 

set at $150,000, the application should address the considerations outlined in 

the Financial Guide.

e. Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals

For information on pre-agreement costs approvals, see Section B. Federal Award 

Information.

5. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable)

Indirect costs are allowed only if the applicant has a current federally approved indirect cost

rate. (This requirement does not apply to units of local government.) Attach a copy of the 

federally approved indirect cost rate agreement to the application. Applicants that do not 

have an approved rate may request one through their cognizant federal agency, which will

review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization, or, if the 

applicant’s accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the direct cost categories.

For the definition of Cognizant Federal Agency, see the “Glossary of Terms” in the Financial 

Guide. For assistance with identifying your cognizant agency, please contact the Customer 

Service Center at 1-800-458-0786 or at ask.ocfo@usdoj.gov. If DOJ is the cognizant federal 

agency, applicants may obtain information needed to submit an indirect cost rate proposal 

at www.ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/IndirectCosts.pdf.

6. Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable)

Tribes, tribal organizations, or third parties proposing to provide direct services or assistance 

to residents on tribal lands should include in their applications a resolution, a letter, affidavit, 

or other documentation, as appropriate, that certifies that the applicant has the legal 

authority from the tribe(s) to implement the proposed project on tribal lands. In those 

instances when an organization or consortium of tribes applies for a grant on behalf of a 

tribe or multiple specific tribes, the application should include appropriate legal 

documentation, as described above, from all tribes that would receive services or assistance 

under the grant. A consortium of tribes for which existing consortium bylaws allow action 

without support from all tribes in the consortium (i.e., without an authorizing resolution or 

comparable legal documentation from each tribal governing body) may submit, instead, a 

copy of its consortium bylaws with the application.

7. Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status

Applicants are to disclose whether they are currently designated high risk by another federal 

grant making agency. This includes any status requiring additional oversight by the federal 

agency due to past programmatic or financial concerns. If an applicant is designated high

risk by another federal grant making agency, you must email the following information 

to OJPComplianceReporting@usdoj.gov at the time of application submission:

• The federal agency that currently designated the applicant as high risk;
22 NIJ-2015-3985

• Date the applicant was designated high risk;

• The high risk point of contact name, phone number, and email address, from that 

federal agency; and

• Reasons for the high risk status.

OJP seeks this information to ensure appropriate federal oversight of any grant award. 

Unlike the Excluded Parties List, this high risk information does not disqualify any 

organization from receiving an OJP award. However, additional grant oversight may be 

included, if necessary, in award documentation.

8. Additional Attachments

a. Applicant disclosure of pending applications14

Applicants are to disclose whether they have pending applications for federally funded

grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding 

to support the same project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the 

identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application 

under this solicitation. The disclosure should include both direct applications for federal 

funding (e.g., applications to federal agencies) and indirect applications for such funding 

(e.g., applications to State agencies that will subaward federal funds).

OJP seeks this information to help avoid any inappropriate duplication of funding. 

Leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement 

comprehensive programs or projects is encouraged and is not seen as inappropriate 

duplication.

Applicants that have pending applications as described above are to provide the 

following information about pending applications submitted within the last 12 months:

• The federal or State funding agency.

• The solicitation name/project name.

• The point of contact information at the applicable funding agency.

 14 Typically, the applicant is not the principal investigator; rather, the applicant, most frequently, is the institution, 

organization, or company in which the principal investigator is employed.
23 NIJ-2015-3985

SAMPLE

Applicants should include the table as a separate attachment, with the file name 

“Disclosure of Pending Applications,” to their application. Applicants that do not have 

pending applications as described above are to include a statement to this effect in the 

separate attachment page (e.g., “[Applicant Name on SF-424] does not have pending 

applications submitted within the last 12 months for federally funded grants or subgrants 

(including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding to support the same 

project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items 

outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation.”).

b. Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity

If a proposal involves research and/or evaluation, regardless of the proposal’s other 

merits, in order to receive funds, the applicant must demonstrate research/evaluation 

independence, including appropriate safeguards to ensure research/evaluation 

objectivity and integrity, both in this proposal and as it may relate to the applicant’s other 

current or prior related projects. This documentation may be included as an attachment 

to the application which addresses BOTH i. and ii. below.

i. For purposes of this solicitation, applicants must document research and evaluation 

independence and integrity by including, at a minimum, one of the following two 

items:

a. A specific assurance that the applicant has reviewed its proposal to identify 

any research integrity issues (including all principal investigators and subrecipients) and it has concluded that the design, conduct, or reporting of 

research and evaluation funded by NIJ grants, cooperative agreements, or 

contracts will not be biased by any personal or financial conflict of interest on 

the part of part of its staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients responsible for 

the research and evaluation or on the part of the applicant organization;

OR

b. A specific listing of actual or perceived conflicts of interest that the applicant 

has identified in relation to this proposal. These conflicts could be either 

personal (related to specific staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients) or 

organizational (related to the applicant or any subgrantee organization). 

Federal or 

State 

Funding 

Agency 

Solicitation 

Name/Project 

Name

Name/Phone/E-mail for Point of Contact at 

Funding Agency

DOJ/COPS COPS Hiring 

Program

Jane Doe, 202/000-0000; jane.doe@usdoj.gov

HHS/ 

Substance 

Abuse & 

Mental Health 

Services 

Administration

Drug Free 

Communities 

Mentoring Program/

North County Youth 

Mentoring Program

John Doe, 202/000-0000; john.doe@hhs.gov
24 NIJ-2015-3985

Examples of potential investigator (or other personal) conflict situations may 

include, but are not limited to, those in which an investigator would be in a 

position to evaluate a spouse’s work product (actual conflict), or an 

investigator would be in a position to evaluate the work of a former or current 

colleague (potential apparent conflict). With regard to potential organizational 

conflicts of interest, as one example, generally an organization could not be 

given a grant to evaluate a project if that organization had itself provided 

substantial prior technical assistance to that specific project or a location 

implementing the project (whether funded by OJP or other sources), as the 

organization in such an instance would appear to be evaluating the 

effectiveness of its own prior work. The key is whether a reasonable person 

understanding all of the facts would be able to have confidence that the 

results of any research or evaluation project are objective and reliable. Any 

outside personal or financial interest that casts doubt on that objectivity and 

reliability of an evaluation or research product is a problem and must be 

disclosed.

ii. In addition, for purposes of this solicitation applicants must address the issue of 

possible mitigation of research integrity concerns by including, at a minimum, one of 

the following two items:

a. If an applicant reasonably believes that no potential personal or 

organizational conflicts of interest exist, then the applicant should provide a 

brief narrative explanation of how and why it reached that conclusion.

Applicants MUST also include an explanation of the specific processes and 

procedures that the applicant will put in place to identify and eliminate (or, at 

the very least, mitigate) potential personal or financial conflicts of interest on 

the part of its staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients for this particular 

project, should that be necessary during the grant period. Documentation that 

may be helpful in this regard could include organizational codes of 

ethics/conduct or policies regarding organizational, personal, and financial 

conflicts of interest.

OR

b. If the applicant has identified specific personal or organizational conflicts of 

interest in its proposal during this review, the applicant must propose a 

specific and robust mitigation plan to address conflicts noted above. At a 

minimum, the plan must include specific processes and procedures that the 

applicant will put in place to eliminate (or, at the very least, mitigate) potential 

personal or financial conflicts of interest on the part of its staff, consultants, 

and/or sub-recipients for this particular project, should that be necessary 

during the grant period. Documentation that may be helpful in this regard 

could include organizational codes of ethics/conduct or policies regarding 

organizational, personal, and financial conflicts of interest. There is no 

guarantee that the plan, if any, will be accepted as proposed.

Considerations in assessing research and evaluation independence and integrity will 

include, but are not be limited to, the adequacy of the applicant’s efforts to identify 

factors that could affect the objectivity or integrity of the proposed staff and/or the 
25 NIJ-2015-3985

organization in carrying out the research, development, or evaluation activity; and the 

adequacy of the applicant’s existing or proposed remedies to control any such factors.

9. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire

In accordance with 2 CFR 200.205, Federal agencies must have in place a framework for 

evaluating the risks posed by applicants before they receive a Federal award. To facilitate 

part of this risk evaluation, all applicants (other than an individual) are to download, 

complete, and submit this form.

10. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

All applicants must complete this information. Applicants that expend any funds for lobbying 

activities are to provide the detailed information requested on the form Disclosure of 

Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL). Applicants that do not expend any funds for lobbying activities 

are to enter “N/A” in the text boxes for item 10 (“a. Name and Address of Lobbying 

Registrant” and “b. Individuals Performing Services”).

How to Apply

Applicants must register in, and submit applications through Grants.gov, a “one-stop storefront” 

to find federal funding opportunities and apply for funding. Find complete instructions on how to 

register and submit an application at www.Grants.gov. Applicants that experience technical 

difficulties during this process should call the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at 800-518-

4726 or 606–545–5035, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except federal holidays. Registering 

with Grants.gov is a one-time process; however, processing delays may occur, and it can 

take several weeks for first-time registrants to receive confirmation and a user password. OJP 

encourages applicants to register several weeks before the application submission deadline. 

In addition, OJP urges applicants to submit applications 72 hours prior to the application due 

date to allow time to receive validation messages or rejection notifications from Grants.gov, and 

to correct in a timely fashion any problems that may have caused a rejection notification.

NIJ strongly encourages all prospective applicants to sign up for Grants.gov email notifications 

regarding this solicitation. If this solicitation is cancelled or modified, individuals who sign up with 

Grants.gov for updates will be automatically notified.

Note on File Names and File Types: Grants.gov only permits the use of certain specific

characters in names of attachment files. Valid file names may include only the characters shown 

in the table below. Grants.gov is designed to reject any application that includes an 

attachment(s) with a file name that contains any characters not shown in the table below. 

Grants.gov is designed to forward successfully submitted applications to OJP’s Grants 

Management System (GMS).
26 NIJ-2015-3985

Characters Special Characters

Upper case (A – Z) Parenthesis ( ) Curly braces { } Square brackets [ ]

Lower case (a – z) Ampersand (&) Tilde (~) Exclamation point (!)

Underscore (__) Comma ( , ) Semicolon ( ; ) Apostrophe ( ‘ )

Hyphen ( - ) At sign (@) Number sign (#) Dollar sign ($)

Space Percent sign (%) Plus sign (+) Equal sign (=)

Period (.) When using the ampersand (&) in XML, applicants must use the “&” 

format.

GMS does not accept executable file types as application attachments. These disallowed 

file types include, but are not limited to, the following extensions: “.com,” “.bat,” “.exe,” “.vbs,”

“.cfg,” “.dat,” “.db,” “.dbf,” “.dll,” “.ini,” “.log,” “.ora,” “.sys,” and “.zip.” GMS may reject applications 

with files that use these extensions. It is important to allow time to change the type of file(s) if 

the application is rejected.

All applicants are required to complete the following steps:

OJP may not make a federal award to an applicant until the applicant has complied with all 

applicable DUNS and SAM requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the 

requirements by the time the federal awarding agency is ready to make a federal award, the 

federal awarding agency may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal 

award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant.

1. Acquire a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. In general, the Office of 

Management and Budget requires that all applicants (other than individuals) for federal 

funds include a DUNS number in their applications for a new award or a supplement to an 

existing award. A DUNS number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the 

universal standard for identifying and differentiating entities receiving federal funds. The 

identifier is used for tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact 

information for federal assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS 

number will be used throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, 

one-time activity. Call Dun and Bradstreet at 866–705–5711 to obtain a DUNS number or 

apply online at www.dnb.com. A DUNS number is usually received within 1-2 business days.

2. Acquire registration with the System for Award Management (SAM). SAM is the 

repository for standard information about federal financial assistance applicants, recipients, 

and subrecipients. OJP requires all applicants (other than individuals) for federal financial 

assistance to maintain current registrations in the SAM database. Applicants must be 

registered in SAM to successfully register in Grants.gov. Applicants must update or renew 

their SAM registration annually to maintain an active status.

Applications cannot be successfully submitted in Grants.gov until Grants.gov receives the 

SAM registration information. The information transfer from SAM to Grants.gov can take up 

to 48 hours. OJP recommends that the applicant register or renew registration with SAM as 

early as possible.

Information about SAM registration procedures can be accessed at www.sam.gov.

3. Acquire an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) and a Grants.gov 

username and password. Complete the AOR profile on Grants.gov and create a username 

and password. The applicant organization’s DUNS number must be used to complete this 
27 NIJ-2015-3985

step. For more information about the registration process, go 

to www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.

4. Acquire confirmation for the AOR from the E-Business Point of Contact (E-Biz POC). 

The E-Biz POC at the applicant organization must log into Grants.gov to confirm the 

applicant organization’s AOR. Note that an organization can have more than one AOR.

5. Search for the funding opportunity on Grants.gov. Use the following identifying 

information when searching for the funding opportunity on Grants.gov. The Catalog of 

Federal Domestic Assistance number for this solicitation is 16.560, titled “National Institute 

of Justice Research, Evaluation, and Development Project Grants” and the funding 

opportunity number is NIJ-2015-3985.

6. Submit a valid application consistent with this solicitation by following the directions 

in Grants.gov. Within 24–48 hours after submitting the electronic application, the applicant 

should receive two notifications from Grants.gov. The first will confirm the receipt of the 

application and the second will state whether the application has been successfully

validated, or rejected due to errors, with an explanation. It is possible to first receive a 

message indicating that the application is received and then receive a rejection notice a few 

minutes or hours later. Submitting well ahead of the deadline provides time to correct the 

problem(s) that caused the rejection. Important: OJP urges applicants to submit 

applications at least 72 hours prior to the application due date to allow time to receive 

validation messages or rejection notifications from Grants.gov, and to correct in a timely 

fashion any problems that may have caused a rejection notification. 

Click here for further details on DUNS, SAM, and Grants.gov registration steps and 

timeframes.

Note: Duplicate Applications

If an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, NIJ will review only the most 

recent system-validated version submitted. See Note on File Names and File Types under How 

To Apply.

Experiencing Unforeseen Grants.gov Technical Issues

Applicants that experience unforeseen Grants.gov technical issues beyond their control that 

prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must contact the Grants.gov 

Customer Support Hotline or the SAM Help Desk to report the technical issue and receive a 

tracking number. Then applicant must e-mail the NIJ contact identified in the Contact 

Information section on page 2 within 24 hours after the application deadline and request 

approval to submit their application. The e-mail must describe the technical difficulties, and 

include a timeline of the applicant’s submission efforts, the complete grant application, the 

applicant’s DUNS number, and any Grants.gov Help Desk or SAM tracking number(s). Note: 

NIJ does not automatically approve requests. After the program office reviews the 

submission, and contacts the Grants.gov or SAM Help Desks to validate the reported technical 

issues, OJP will inform the applicant whether the request to submit a late application has been 

approved or denied. If OJP determines that the applicant failed to follow all required procedures, 

which resulted in an untimely application submission, OJP will deny the applicant’s request to 

submit their application.
28 NIJ-2015-3985

The following conditions are generally insufficient to justify late submissions:

• Failure to register in SAM or Grants.gov in sufficient time.

• Failure to follow Grants.gov instructions on how to register and apply as posted on its 

website.

• Failure to follow each instruction in the OJP solicitation.

• Technical issues with the applicant’s computer or information technology environment, 

including firewalls.

Notifications regarding known technical problems with Grants.gov, if any, are posted at 

the top of the OJP funding Web page 

at www.ojp.gov/funding/Explore/CurrentFundingOpportunities.htm.

E. Application Review Information

Selection Criteria

Depending on the number of applications received, applications may be categorized by 

scientific discipline into discrete groups for purposes of peer review and/or selection for award.

Applications that meet basic minimum requirements will be evaluated by peer reviewers using 

the following review criteria.

Statement of the Problem (Understanding of the problem and its importance) – 10% 

1. Demonstrated understanding of the problem that exists in an identified forensic science 

field/discipline or area of criminal justice. 

2. Demonstrated awareness of the state of current research. 

Project Design and Implementation (Quality and technical merit) – 50%

1. Soundness of methods and analytic and technical approach to addressing the stated 

aim(s) of the proposed project. (The overall strategy, methodology, and analyses should 

be well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project.) 

2. Feasibility of proposed project and the strength of supporting data. (The proof of 

principle of the proposed technology or methodology should be established and 

supported by preliminary data presented in or referenced in the proposal. More 

innovative plans and/or plans with a higher potential for failure should be 

counterbalanced to manage the inherent risk; e.g., by firm theoretical basis, reasonable 

preliminary data (depending on the mechanism), the track record of the principal 

investigator and any co-principal investigator(s), and an outstanding scientific and 

management plan).

3. Awareness of potential pitfalls of proposed project design and feasibility of proposed 

actions to minimize and/or mitigate them.
29 NIJ-2015-3985

Potential Impact – 20% 

Potential for a significant scientific or technical advance(s) that will improve criminal/juvenile

justice in the United States, such as—

• Potential for significantly improved understanding of the stated criminal/juvenile justice 

problem. (If the goals of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical 

capability, and/or forensic science practice in the criminal justice system be improved? 

What is the likelihood that the project will exert a sustained, powerful influence on the 

forensic science field(s) related to criminal justice?)

• Potential for innovative solution to address (all or a significant part of) the stated 

criminal/juvenile justice problem. (How will successful completion change the concepts, 

methods, technologies, treatments, or services that drive the forensic science field as it 

relates to criminal justice? How will a successful project address the identified criminal 

justice or forensic science problem and associated critical barriers to progress?)

Capabilities/Competencies (Capabilities, demonstrated productivity, and experience of the 

applicant organization and proposed project staff) – 20%

1. Qualifications and experience of proposed project staff (that is, the principal investigator, 

any and all co-principal investigators, and all other individuals (and organizations)

identified in the application (regardless of “investigator” status) who will be significantly 

involved in substantive aspects of the proposal).

2. Demonstrated ability of the applicant organization to manage the effort.

3. Relationship between the capabilities/competencies of the proposed project staff 

(including the applicant organization) and the scope of the proposed project.

4. Strength of the scientific environment (e.g., institutional support, equipment and other 

physical resources, or collaborative arrangements) in which the work will be done and its 

contribution to the probability of success. 

Budget

Peer reviewers will consider and may comment on the following additional items in the context 

of scientific and technical merit.

1. Total cost of the project relative to the perceived benefit (cost effectiveness).

2. Appropriateness of the budget relative to the level of effort.

3. Use of existing resources to conserve costs.

4. Proposed budget alignment with proposed project activities.
30 NIJ-2015-3985

Plan for Dissemination to Broader Audiences (if applicable to the proposed project)

Peer reviewers may comment – in the context of scientific and technical merit – on the proposed 

plan (if any) to produce or to make available to broader interested audiences, such as 

criminal/juvenile justice practitioners or policymakers, summary information from the planned 

scholarly products of the project.

Review Process

OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. NIJ reviews the 

application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, 

measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with the solicitation.

Peer reviewers will review the applications submitted under this solicitation that meet basic 

minimum requirements (critical elements). For purposes of assessing whether applicants have 

met basic minimum requirements, OJP screens applications for compliance with specified 

program requirements to help determine which applications should proceed to further 

consideration for award. Although program requirements may vary, the following are common 

requirements applicable to all solicitations for funding under OJP grant programs:

• Applications must be submitted by an eligible type of applicant.

• Applications must request funding within programmatic funding constraints (if 

applicable).

• Applications must be responsive to the scope of the solicitation.

• Applications must include all items designated as “critical elements.”

• Applicants will be checked against the General Services Administration’s Excluded 

Parties List.

For a list of critical elements, see “What an Application Should Include” under Section D. 

Application and Submission Information.

NIJ may use internal peer reviewers, external peer reviewers, or a combination, to assess 

applications meeting basic minimum requirements on technical merit using the solicitation’s 

selection criteria. An external peer reviewer is an expert in the subject matter of a given 

solicitation who is not a current DOJ employee. An internal reviewer is a current DOJ employee 

who is well-versed or has expertise in the subject matter of this solicitation. A peer review panel

will evaluate, score, and rate applications that meet basic minimum requirements. 

OJP reviews applications for potential discretionary awards to evaluate the risks posed by 

applicants before they receive an award. This review may include but is not limited to the 

following:

1. Financial stability and fiscal integrity
31 NIJ-2015-3985

2. Quality of management systems and ability to meet the management standards 

prescribed in the Financial Guide

3. History of performance

4. Reports and findings from audits

5. The applicant's ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other 

requirements imposed on non-Federal entities

6. Proposed costs to determine if the Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative 

accurately explain project costs, and whether those costs are reasonable, necessary, 

and allowable under applicable federal cost principles and agency regulations

All final award decisions will be made by the Director of the National Institute of Justice. Peer 

reviewers’ ratings and any resulting recommendations are advisory only, although their views 

are considered carefully. In addition to peer review ratings, considerations for award 

recommendations and decisions may include, but are not limited to, planned scholarly products, 

proposed budgets, past performance (including scholarly products) under prior NIJ and OJP 

awards, research independence and integrity, strategic priorities, “new investigator” status, 

“innovative areas of research,” and available funding when making awards.

F. Federal Award Administration Information

Federal Award Notices

OJP award notification will be sent from GMS. Recipients will be required to login; accept any 

outstanding assurances and certifications on the award; designate a financial point of contact; 

and review, sign, and accept the award. The award acceptance process involves physical 

signature of the award document by the authorized representative and the scanning of the fullyexecuted award document to OJP.

Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements

If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the 

agency-approved project proposal and budget, the recipient must comply with award terms and 

conditions, and other legal requirements, that are included in the award, incorporated into the 

award by reference, or are otherwise applicable to the award. OJP strongly encourages 

prospective applicants to review the information pertaining to these requirements prior to 

submitting an application. To assist applicants and recipients in accessing and reviewing this 

information, OJP has placed it on its Solicitation Requirements page of the OJP Funding 

Resource Center.

Please note in particular the following two forms, which applicants must submit in GMS prior to 

the receipt of any award funds, as each details legal requirements with which applicants must 

provide specific assurances and certifications of compliance. Applicants may view these forms

in the OJP Funding Resource Center and are strongly encouraged to review and consider them 

carefully prior to making an application for OJP grant funds.
32 NIJ-2015-3985

• Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility 

Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements

• Standard Assurances

Upon grant approval, OJP electronically transmits (via GMS) the award document to the 

prospective award recipient. In addition to other award information, the award document 

contains award terms and conditions that specify national policy requirements15 with which 

recipients of federal funding must comply; uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, 

and audit requirements; and program-specific terms and conditions required based on 

applicable program (statutory) authority or requirements set forth in OJP solicitations and 

program announcements. For example, certain efforts may call for special requirements, terms, 

or conditions relating to intellectual property, data/information-sharing or -access, or information 

security; or audit requirements, expenditures and milestones, or publications and/or press 

releases.

OJP also may place additional terms and conditions on an award based on its risk assessment 

of the applicant, or for other reasons it determines necessary to fulfill the goals and objectives of 

the program. 

Prospective applicants may access and review the text of mandatory conditions OJP includes in 

all OJP awards, as well as the text of certain other conditions, such as administrative conditions, 

via OJP’s Mandatory Award Terms and Conditions page of the Funding Resource Center.

As stated above, NIJ expects that it will make any award from this solicitation in the form of a 

cooperative agreement. Cooperative agreement awards include standard “federal involvement” 

conditions that describe the general allocation of responsibility for execution of the funded 

program. Generally-stated, under cooperative agreement awards, responsibility for the day-today conduct of the funded project rests with the recipient in implementing the funded and 

approved proposal and budget, and the award terms and conditions. Responsibility for oversight 

and redirection of the project, if necessary, rests with NIJ.

In addition to any “federal involvement” condition(s), OJP cooperative agreement awards 

include a special condition specifying certain reporting requirements required in connection with 

conferences, meetings, retreats, seminars, symposium, training activities, or similar events 

funded under the award, consistent with OJP policy and guidance on “conference” approval, 

planning, and reporting.

General Information About Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements

Recipients must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual progress reports, final financial 

and progress reports, and, if applicable, an annual audit report in accordance with 2 CFR Part 

200. Applicants should anticipate that progress reports will be required to follow the nonbudgetary components of the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) template/format. 

General information on RPPRs may be found at www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rppr/. Future

awards and fund drawdowns may be withheld if reports are delinquent.

 15 See generally 2 C.F.R. 200.300 (provides a general description of national policy requirements typically applicable 

to recipients of Federal awards, including the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 

(FFATA)).
33 NIJ-2015-3985

Special Reporting requirements may be required by OJP depending on the statutory, legislative 

or administrative requirements of the recipient or the program.

As indicated earlier in this solicitation, NIJ expects scholarly products to result from any award 

under this solicitation. Please review the Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected 

Scholarly Products segment of the “Program-Specific Information” section of this solicitation, as 

well as the “Performance Measures” section.

In addition to the expectation of scholarly products, successful applicants under this solicitation 

will be required to submit the following deliverables regarding the work funded by the NIJ award.

Draft and Final Summary Overview of the Work Conducted under the Award

The overview is expected to provide an overall summary of the work under, and results of, the 

project funded by NIJ under this solicitation. Among other things, the summary overview should 

address the purpose of the project, project subjects (if applicable), project design and methods, 

data analysis, project findings, and implications for criminal justice policy and practice in the 

United States. The overview should be suitable for dissemination to the general public; and 

contain no proprietary, confidential information or trade secrets.

A draft summary overview no longer than 10 pages long (double-spaced) is to be submitted 90 

days prior to the end of the project period for NIJ review and comment.

Required Data Sets and Associated Files and Documentation

As discussed earlier, NIJ requires recipients of an award under this solicitation to submit to 

NACJD, or another more appropriate public database, all data sets that result in whole or in part 

from the work funded by NIJ, along with associated files and any documentation necessary to 

allow for future efforts by others to reproduce the project’s findings and/or to extend the 

scientific value of the data set through secondary analysis. All data sets and necessary 

documentation are to be submitted 90 days prior to the end of the project period. For more 

information, see the “Program Narrative” section of What an Application Should Include.

Performance Measures

To assist the Department with fulfilling its responsibilities under the Government Performance 

and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), Public Law 103-62, and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010, 

Public Law 111–352, applicants that receive funding under this solicitation must provide data 

that measure the results of their work done under this solicitation. OJP will require any award 

recipient, post award, to provide the data requested in the “Data Grantee Provides” column so 

that OJP can calculate values for the “Performance Measures” column. (Submission of 

performance measures data is not required for the application.) Performance measures for this 

solicitation are as follows:
34 NIJ-2015-3985

Objective Performance Measure(s) Data Grantee Provides

Conduct research in 

science, technology, 

engineering, and/or 

mathematics having clear 

implications for criminal 

justice policy and practice 

in the United States.

1. Relevance to the needs of the field as 

measured by whether the project’s 

substantive scope did not deviate from the 

funded proposal or any subsequent agencyapproved modifications to the scope.

2. Quality of the research as demonstrated by 

the scholarly products that result in whole or 

in part from work funded under the NIJ 

award (published, peer-reviewed, scientific 

journal articles, and/or (as appropriate for 

the funded project) law review journal 

articles, book chapter(s) or book(s) in the 

academic press, technological prototypes, 

patented inventions, or similar scientific 

products).

3. Quality of management as measured by 

such factors as whether significant project 

milestones were achieved, reporting and 

other deadlines were met, and costs 

remained within approved limits.

4. If applicable, the number of technologies 

fielded as a result (in whole or in part) of 

work funded under the NIJ award.

1. Quarterly financial 

reports, semi-annual 

and final progress 

reports, and a draft and 

final summary overview 

of the work performed 

under the NIJ award.

2. List of citation(s) to all 

scholarly products that 

resulted in whole or in 

part from work funded 

under the NIJ award.

3. If applicable, each data 

set that resulted in 

whole or in part from 

work funded under the 

NIJ award.

4. If applicable, a 

description of all 

technologies fielded as 

a result (in whole or in 

part) of work funded 

under the NIJ award.

G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)

For additional Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s), see the Title page.

For additional contact information for Grants.gov, see the Title page. 

H. Other Information

Provide Feedback to OJP

To assist OJP in improving its application and award processes, we encourage applicants to 

provide feedback on this solicitation, the application submission process, and/or the application 

review/peer review process. Provide feedback to OJPSolicitationFeedback@usdoj.gov.

IMPORTANT: This e-mail is for feedback and suggestions only. Replies are not sent from this 

mailbox. If you have specific questions on any program or technical aspect of the solicitation, 

you must directly contact the appropriate number or e-mail listed on the front of this solicitation 

document. These contacts are provided to help ensure that you can directly reach an individual 

who can address your specific questions in a timely manner.

If you are interested in being a reviewer for other OJP grant applications, please e-mail your 

resume to ojppeerreview@lmbps.com. The OJP Solicitation Feedback email account will not 
35 NIJ-2015-3985

forward your resume. Note: Neither you nor anyone else from your organization can be a peer 

reviewer in a competition in which you or your organization have submitted an application.
36 NIJ-2015-3985

Application Checklist

Research and Development in Forensic Science for Criminal Justice 

Purposes

This application checklist has been created to assist in developing an application.

What an Applicant Should Do:

Prior to Registering in Grants.gov:

_____ Acquire a DUNS Number (see page 26)

_____ Acquire or renew registration with SAM (see page 26)

To Register with Grants.gov:

_____ Acquire AOR and Grants.gov username/password (see page 26)

_____ Acquire AOR confirmation from the E-Biz POC (see page 27)

To Find Funding Opportunity:

_____ Search for the funding opportunity on Grants.gov (see page 27)

_____ Download Funding Opportunity and Application Package (see page 27)

_____ Sign up for Grants.gov email notifications (optional) (see page 25)

_____ Read Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov

After application submission, receive Grants.gov email notifications that:

_____ (1) Application has been received

_____ (2) Application has either been successfully validated or rejected with errors 

 (see page 27)

If no Grants.gov receipt, and validation or error notifications are received:

_____ Contact NIJ regarding experiencing technical difficulties (see page 27)

General Requirements:

_____ Review the Solicitation Requirements in the OJP Funding Resource Center.

What an Application Should Include: 

_____ Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) (see page 15)

_____ Project Abstract (see page 16)

_____ Program Narrative (see page 16)

_____ Appendices (see page 18)

_____ Bibliography/references 

_____ Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps pertaining 

to the proposed study that supplement those in the narrative 

_____ Supporting Data—This should include any preliminary data to support the 

investigator’s ability to perform the work and/or proof of principle for the 

proposed research/technology

_____ Curriculum vitae or resumes of the principal investigator and any and all coprincipal investigators.

_____ Documentation of “new investigator” status, if applicable

_____ List (to the extent known) of all proposed project staff members

_____ Proposed project timeline and expected milestones

_____ Human Subjects Protection Paperwork 

_____ Privacy Certificate 
37 NIJ-2015-3985

_____ List of any previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigator(s)

_____ Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from organizations 

collaborating in the project, or letters of intent to establish agreements (if 

applicable)

_____ List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which this proposal 

has been submitted (if applicable)

_____ Data archiving plan

_____ Budget Detail Worksheet (see page 20)

_____ Budget Narrative (see page 20)

_____ Employee Compensation Waiver request and justification (if applicable) 

(see page 13)

_____ Read OJP policy and guidance on “conference” approval, planning, and reporting

available 

at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/PostawardRequirements/chapter15page1.htm (

see page 14)

_____ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (see page 25)

_____ Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see page 21)

_____ Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) (see page 21)

_____ Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status (see page 21)

_____ Additional Attachments 

_____ Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications (see page 22)

_____ Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity (see page 23)

_____ Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (if applicable)

(see page 25)