alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Locke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 9, 2006                                                           
|                                                                      
|/s/    CHRISTOPHER J.
LOCKE                                           
|Christopher J. Locke Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-536

In Re: HAROLD JOE STRICKLAND, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CR-92-115-MU, CA-94-280-MU)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Joe Strickland, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Harold J. Strickland, Jr., filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus in this court requesting the court to compel the district

court to respond to his habeas motion, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as

amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 (Law. Co-op.

Advance Sheet June 1996), and various other motions he filed in the

district court.

We note that the district court entered an order in August

1996 directing the Respondent to file an answer to Strickland's

habeas motion. Therefore, we grant Strickland in forma pauperis

status and deny his petition because there has been no undue delay

in the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Stella Jacobs, Plaintiff, *v.*Alrae Hotel Corp., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County,

December 14, 1956.

*Joseph Haskell*for plaintiff.

*Milton Gerber*for defendant.

Francis X. Conlon, J.

In the court’s opinion the evidence establishes that the negligence of defendant contributed to the loss of plaintiff’s jewelry. A theft or burglary does not exonerate a bailee if the latter’s lack of proper care has made the loss possible *(Faucett*v. *Nichols,*64 N. Y. 377; *Collins*v. *Burns,*63 N. Y. 1, 7). Had the doors of the safe been locked at the time of the robbery, the fact that the unit or section, which included the box containing the plaintiff’s jewelry, was removable from the safe might not be sufficient, in itself, to charge defendant with negligence. In view, however, of the fact that the safe doors were left open and unlocked and that access to the inside of the safe was unobstructed, the removability of the unit or section becomes a factor of great importance. The maintenance of the safe containing removable units or sections of safe deposit boxes, with the safe doors open and with no physical bar to access to the safe, other than the presence of the night clerk at the office counter, did not constitute proper care by the defendant of articles left in safe-deposit boxes in the safe.

The provisions of paragraph 13 of the lease between plaintiff’s husband and the defendant do not exonerate the latter from liability, in view of the language of section 234 of the *666Beal Property Law. *Nor*do the provisions of section 200 of the General Business Law avail the defendant in view of the fact that the plaintiff was not a *“*guest or traveler ” within the meaning of that section.

I find that plaintiff’s jewelry was lost, while in the possession of the defendant, by reason of the latter’s negligence and that it is liable for the fair and reasonable value of the jewelry. The evidence as to value was opinion evidence which was not as clear and convincing as it might have been. Plaintiff’s husband did not take the stand to corroborate her testimony that he had purchased the jewelry and then given it to her; nor did he testify as to the amount he paid for the jewelry. Two jewelers testified as to their appraisals of the value of the jewelry. The one who testified as to the earrings and brooches was not sure whether his firm had made the sale to plaintiff’s husband. The other, who testified as to the bracelet, did not sell it to plaintiff’s husband and his appraisal was “ for insurance purposes only ”. I find that the value of the lost jewelry was $15,000 and I direct judgment for plaintiff in that amount, with interest and costs.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law have been waived. The foregoing represents the court’s decision.
#### Nyon Sook Lee, Individually and as Executrix of Bong *466Gill Lee, Deceased, Respondent, v Lawrence Shields, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the defendant Lawrence Shields appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), entered March 21, 1989, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Subsequent to the perfection of this appeal, a final judgment in this action was entered in favor of the appellant. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





________________








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT,


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934








DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  August 4, 2011








CHYRON CORPORATION


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








New York
01-09014
11-2117385(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)








5 Hub DriveMelville, New York
11747(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)








Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000











Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


























Item 2.02                      Results of Operations and Financial Condition





On August 4, 2011, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the second quarter and first six months ended June 30, 2011. A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1





Item 9.01                      Financial Statements and Exhibits





(c)           Exhibits.





99.1           Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated August 4, 2011.











SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CHYRON CORPORATION





By:
/s/ Jerry KieliszakName:
Jerry KieliszakTitle:
Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Exhibit No.
Description99.1
Press Release, dated August 4, 2011.











Date:  August 4, 2011
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                       Registration No. 33-59791


                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $7,000,000,000
                   Global Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series C
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                 Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series C
               Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing Supplement,  dated  January 24, 1996
     (To Prospectus Supplement, dated August 7, 1995;
     to Prospectus, dated August 7, 1995)

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The  terms  of the  Senior  Notes  set  forth in this  Pricing  Supplement
supplement  and modify,  to the extent  applicable,  the  description of general
terms and provisions of Citicorp's Global Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series C set
forth in the  accompanying  Prospectus  and Prospectus  Supplement.  Capitalized
terms not defined  herein shall have the meanings  assigned to such terms in the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:               5.75% Senior Notes Due January 29, 2001
                              (the "Notes").
Aggregate
  Principal Amount:           $25,000,000.00.

Price to Public:              100%.

Issue Date:                   January 29, 1996.

Stated Maturity:              January 29, 2001.

Interest Rate:                5.75% per annum.

Interest Payment Dates:       Semi-annually on the 29th day of each January and
                              July, commencing on July 29, 1996, and at Stated
                              Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:         The date that is 15 calendar days prior to the
                              related Interest Payment Date.

Sinking Fund:                 None.

Redemption:                   None.

Selling Agent:                Lehman Brothers Inc.

Commission:                   0.090%.

CUSIP Number:                 17303 LRC 7.
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                          
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail 
 National Center on Forensics
        

                          A Program of the National Institute of Justice Project Partners
George Mason University
  
National Association of Attorneys General
  
American Society of Clinical Pathology - Stronger Together
  
Montana Department of Justice, Attorney General Austin KnudsenThe National Institute of Justice has made to consecutive awards for the National Center on Forensics which includes a collaboration of partners from forensic science, forensic pathology, and law.

Awardee: George Mason University

Partners:

National Association of Attorneys General
	American Society for Clinical Pathology
	Office of the Medical Examiner, Montana
  
Date Created: November 19, 2021
    
          Side Navigation
Overview
News and Announcements
Project Partners
Training
Educational Resources
Publications and Reports
Post-PCAST Court Decisions Assessing the Admissibility of Forensic Science Evidence
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
FORM U-6B-2
CERTIFICATE OF NOTIFICATION
under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 ("Act")

     The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company ("CG&E"), an Ohio corporation
and gas and electric utility subsidiary of Cinergy Corp., a registered
holding company under the Act, hereby notifies the Commission that it has
issued the securities described below pursuant to an exemption from Section
6(a) of the Act as further described below:

1.   Type of security: debentures.
2.   Issue, renewal or guaranty:  issuance.
3.   Principal amount:  $100,000,000.
4.   Annual rate of interest:  6.40%.
5.   Date of issue:  April 7, 1998.
6.   Date of maturity:  April 1, 2008, subject to prior redemption in whole
at option of CG&E at any time upon 30 days' notice.
7.   Purchasers:  Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Donaldson, Lufkin &
Jenrette Securities Corporation, as underwriters.
8.   Collateral:  None.
9.   Net proceeds:  approximately $98,994,000. 
10.  Use of proceeds:  Repayment of short-term indebtedness.
11.  Exemption claimed:  Rule 52(a).


                              The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company  


                              By:  /s/ William L. Sheafer 
                                   Vice President & Treasurer 

Dated: April 13, 1998
#### Eugene HOLMES, Appellant, v. Lewis CARROLL, trading as Lewis Carroll Packing Company, Appellee. Luther HOLMES, Appellant, v. Lewis CARROLL, trading as Lewis Carroll Packing Company, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Oct. 19, 1954.

*204Sanders, McEwan & Berson, Orlando, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.

THOMAS, Justice.

The salient facts set out in the pleadings are common to both these cases. The appellants, while in the employ of Young-blood & Sons, Inc., were passengers in a truck which was struck by another truck alleged to have been negligently operated by one A. M. Kirksey and owned by the ap-pellee. The appellants were injured in the collision which occurred about 21 December 1949. Late in the year 1951 the appellants sued the appellee.

The judge denied a motion to strike the sixth defense, which-set out that the plaintiffs were “limited and. controlled” in the right of recovery by the Workmen’s Compensation Law, -F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.; that they, having received money from the insurance carrier,- could bring the suits only' “for’ the - use and 'benefit of the * * * insurer or jointly” with the carrier.

The defendant, now appellee, propounded two interrogatories which were answered by the plaintiffs. By these the simple facts were developed that the plaintiffs were employees at the time of the collision and had received full compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

On the pleadings and these answers the judge entered summary judgments for the defendant.

This record is the basis for the appellants’ -question, whether under the law in effect at the time of the injuries the appellants. could receive benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and later sue a-third party tort-feasor, when the employer or, we presume, insurer, had not brought suit within one year.

Under Chapter 23822, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1947, which amended Sec. 440.39, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A., the employee could bring an action for the sole benefit of himself or his dependents, and could recover full damages regardless of compensation if the employer or insurance carrier failed to sue within one year. There were other conditions in the act which are not relevant to the present case.

So under the law in effect at the time the appellants were injured they had a right to sue when they did and this right was wholly uninfluenced by the fact that they, meanwhile, received compensation. Once the period fixed in the statute had passed without the exercise by employer or insurance carrier of the right to sue, the damages recoverable and the compensation received became separate and independent, Brinson v. Southeastern Utilities Service Co., Fla. *72*So.2d 37. Inasmuch as it is not shown that the employer exercised the right to sue, the defense from which we have quoted was of no avail and the facts established by the answers to the. interrogatories could not operate in appellee’s favor to defeat appellants' suits.

*205The judgments are reversed with directions to proceed with the trial of the other issues.

Reversed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON and DREW, JJ'., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. Archbold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 19, 2009



/s/ Michael G. ArchboldMichael G. ArchboldChief Financial and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
exv10w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) Effective the 17th
day of February 2005, between PLUM CREEK TIMBERLANDS, L.P. (“SELLER”), a Delaware limited
partnership, as Lessor and WPP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“BUYER”).



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, BUYER and SELLER entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 28, 2005
(the “Agreement”) covering certain SELLER’s coal interests (along with cetin surface tracts) in
Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky; and,



     WHEREAS, the Agreement at Section 7.2 contains a provision to adjust the Purchase Price based
upon revisions to certain Production Projections made by Seller; and,



     WHEREAS, BUYER and SELLER have reached an agreement on Production Projections Adjustment set
forth in Section 7.2 and desire to amend the Agreement to reflect the mutual agreement of the
parties;



NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration, paid by SELLER TO BUYER, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
irrevocably acknowledged by BUYER, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:




A. Section 3.1 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:


3.1 Purchase Price. In consideration of the sale of the Properties by SELLER
to BUYER, BUYER shall pay to SELLER at Closing cash in the amount of Twenty One

 








 





Million Two
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($21,250,000.00) (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price
may be adjusted as provided in Section 7.4 and in Article X (the Purchase Price, as so
adjusted, and as the same may be otherwise adjusted by the mutual agreement of the parties,
being called the “Adjusted Purchase Price”).



B. Section 7.2 of the Agreement is amend to read:




7.2 Intentionally Omitted 




C. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment in one or more identical counterparts
as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
PLUM CREEK TIMBERLANDS, L.P.
By: Plum Creek Timber I, L.L.C.
Its: General Partner
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Rick R. Holley

	 
	 	 	Rick R. Holley

President and Chief Executive Officer 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	


WPP LLC

By : NRP(Operating) LLC

Its: Sole Member

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Nick Carter
 	 
	 	 	Nick Carter 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Operating Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nature Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Nature
      Vision, Inc.Date:
      November 14, 2008
                    By:
                    /s/ Jeffrey P. ZernovJeffrey
      P. ZernovChief
      Executive Officer and President(principal
      executive officer)Date:
      November 14, 2008
                    By:
                    /s/ Robert P. KingRobert
      P. KingChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nature Vision, Inc. and will be retained by Nature Vision, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.