alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Portec Inc.
1995 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                            3956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13726
<ALLOWANCES>                                       646
<INVENTORY>                                      17809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 36599
<PP&E>                                           31334
<DEPRECIATION>                                   17487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   58972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16589
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          4247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     58972
<SALES>                                          77506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 77976
<CGS>                                            54996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    71419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5270
<INCOME-TAX>                                       140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 18, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2100

Lower Tribunal No. 19-31187

________________

Serviquim CA, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Manuchar NV, etc.,

Appellee.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Vivianne Del Rio, Judge. 

Mavrick Law Firm, Peter T. Mavrick, Nathan A. Kelvy, and Lauren 

Swanson (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP, Robin Bresky, and 

Randall Burks (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS, and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Burnham v. Superior Ct. of California, Cnty. of Marin, 

495 U.S. 604, 619 (1990) (“[J]urisdiction based on physical presence alone 

constitutes due process because it is one of the continuing traditions of our 

legal system that define the due process standard of ‘traditional notions of 

fair play and substantial justice.’”); Durkee v. Durkee, 906 So. 2d 1176, 1177 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (quoting Garrett v. Garrett, 668 So. 2d 991, 994 (Fla. 

1996) (Wells, J., concurring)) (“Florida courts have personal jurisdiction over 

a nonresident defendant when that nonresident defendant is properly served 

with service of process while that nonresident defendant is voluntarily 

present in Florida.”); Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015) 

(quoting Re-Employment Services, Ltd. v. Nat’l Loan Acquisitions Co., 969 

So. 2d 467, 471 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)) (“If the return [of service] is regular on 

its face, then the service of process is presumed to be valid and the party 

challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear 

and convincing evidence.”); § 48.081(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Process 

against any private corporation, domestic or foreign, may be served: . . . . on 

any director . . . .”); Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.516(a) (emphasis added) (“Unless 

the court otherwise orders, . . . every . . . document . . . must be served in 

accordance with this rule . . . .”); Emerald Coast Utils. Auth. v. Bear Marcus 

Pointe, LLC, 227 So. 3d 752, 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“[A] conscious 
3

decision to use a defective email system without any safeguards or oversight 

. . . cannot constitute excusable neglect.”).
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth R. Posner, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 10, 2004



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|/s/ Kenneth R. Posner                                                                           
|                                                                                                
|Kenneth R. Posner Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41093 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. SAUL LATIN, true name Saul Adrian Latin,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 74

- 1

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Saul Latin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Latin h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. Although counsel addresses the validity of Latin’s appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 11, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41093 Document: 00513421195 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2016No. 15

- 41093

2 waiver, counsel does not discuss the district court’s compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedu re 11. An appeal waiver in the plea agreement does not waive the district court’s compliance with Rule 11 or the need to brief this issue adequately in an Anders brief. See United States v. Carreon

- Ibarra , 673 F.3d 358, 362 n.3 (5th Cir. 2012); see also United States v. Brown , 328 F.3d 787, 789

- 90 (5th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, our independent review confirms that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. We therefore concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41093 Document: 00513421195 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2016
**EXHIBIT
      3(a)**











Section
      2.1 of By-Laws amended as follows as of December 6, 2006:










SECTION
      2.1.  Annual
      Meeting. The
      annual meeting of the shareholders shall be held on the fourth Friday of the
      month of February in each year, if not a legal holiday, or, if a legal holiday,
      then on the next succeeding business day, or such other day that the Board
      of
      Directors may designate, for the purpose of electing directors and for the
      transaction of such other business as may come before the meeting. If the
      election of directors shall not be held on the day herein designated, or such
      other day designated by the Board of Directors, for the annual meeting, or
      at
      any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors shall cause such election to
      be
      held at a special meeting of the shareholders as soon thereafter as
      convenient.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,769
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           380
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,343)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,769
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 03, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 03, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0229. MICHAEL JOHN BARRETT v. REAGAN C BARRETT.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2018SUV845
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00261

- CV

S AMMY J O K RESSENBERG
, Appellant

V

.

N ATIONSTAR HECM A CQUISITION T RUST 2015

- 2, W ILMINGTON S AVINGS F UND S OCIETY
, FSB NOT

INDIVIDUALLY
, BUT SOLELY AS

TRUSTEE , Appellee §

§

§

§ On A ppeal from the 96th District
Court

of Tarrant County (096

- 287991

- 16)

April 9, 2020

Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It i s ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Sammy Jo Kressenberg shall pay all of the

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel
Exhibit 10.451


 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


 


For
good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the undersigned, INLAND REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., an
Illinois corporation, (“Assignor”) hereby assigns to INLAND WESTERN PHOENIX
19TH AVENUE, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, (“Assignee”) all of
Assignor’s right, title and interest as a party to that certain Purchase and
Sale Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between INLAND REAL ESTATE
ACQUISITIONS, INC., or its designees, (collectively, “Purchaser”), and FRC WEST
PROPERTY, L.L.C., AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC., and
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, (collectively, “Seller”), dated
December 16, 2004 for purchase and sale of certain real property commonly known
as 20002 N. 19th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ (the “Property”).


 


By execution hereof by Assignee, Assignee for itself and its successors
and assigns hereby accepts the assignment and assumes all of the obligations of
Assignor under the Purchase Agreement with respect to the Property.


 


This
Assignment is effective as of the 16 day of December, 2004.


 


	
  ASSIGNOR:

  	
   

  	
  INLAND REAL ESTATE
  ACQUISITIONS, INC.,

  an Illinois corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Joseph Cosenza

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  G. Joseph Cosenza

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ASSIGNEE:

  	
   

  	
  INLAND WESTERN PHOENIX
  19TH AVENUE,

  L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

  By: Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.,

  its sole member

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Joseph Cosenza

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its:  Authorized Representative
Order filed, July 30, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00098

- CR

____________ JUAN TORRES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1338600



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 15, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter ’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Edna Thornton , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.8    
    


        

  







MediCor Ltd.  


        THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER
SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH REQUEST MUST BE MADE TO THE CORPORATION'S SECRETARY
AT THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION. 


        Keep
this Certificate in a safe place. If it is lost, stolen or destroyed, the Corporation will require a bond of indemnity as a condition to the issuance of a replacement certificate. 



        The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as through they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: 



	 	TEN COM	 	—	 	as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT	—	 	 
	 	Custodian	 	 

	 	TEN ENT	 	—	 	as tenants by the entireties	 	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 	 	(Minor)
	 	JT TEN	 	—	 	as joint tenants with right	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 	 	 	 	 	of survivorship and not as	 	 	Act	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	tenants in common	 	 	 	 	
 (State)	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	UNIF TRF MIN ACT	—	 	 
	 	Custodian (until age	 	 
	)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	under Uniform Transfers
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Minor)	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to Minors Act	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(State)




Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 



	For Value Received,	 	 
	 	hereby sell, assign and transfer unto








	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 	 
	
	 	 
	 
	 	 








	 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE(S)
	 

	 

	 









	Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
	

appoint	
 	

 
	
 	

Attorney
	to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.








	Dated	 	 
	 	 

	

In the presence of



 
	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
	

 
	
 	

 








	Signature(s) Guaranteed	 	 
	

By	
 	

 
	
 	

 
	THE SIGNATURES MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM)
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.	 	 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.8
#### Hannah Puld, Appellant, *v.*Bertha Williams et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

December 13, 1956.

*Jacob A. Singer*and *Seymour Mamberg*for appellant.

*Benjamin Gold*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The motion to open the default was not made within one year after service of a copy of the judgment with notice of entry. Accordingly the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 108; N. Y. City Mun. *794Ct. Code, § 129, subd. 2.) Moreover, the affidavits and proof clearly established that the default of the defendants was deliberate and inexcusable.

The order should be unanimously reversed on the facts, with $10 costs to plaintiff, and motion denied.

Pette, Hart and Di Gtovanna, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

27 

KA 13-00861 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JACOB C. BUCHANAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM CLAUSS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Joanne M. Winslow, J.), rendered August 28, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the

second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same memorandum as in People v Buchanan ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [Feb. 5, 2016]).

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EX-10.2






Credit Agreement, dated June 25, 2003, among the Corporation, as borrower, the subsidiaries of
the Corporation, as guarantors, the lenders listed therein, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
issuing bank, Wachovia Securities, Inc., as arranger, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
administrative agent (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Corporation’s second quarter 2003 Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, Commission File No. 1-4682, and incorporated herein by reference).
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

West Texas Landscape, Inc. * From the 3 2nd District Court

d/b/a Taylor Landscape Co., of Nolan County,

Trial Court No. 19,720

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 003 71

- C V * September 16 , 20 2 1

Mark Meneses

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against West Texas Landscape, Inc. d/b/a/ Taylor

Landscape Co

.
Agreement between Royce Biomedical Inc. ("Royce") and Curvelo Trade & Finance
                 Ltd., ("Curvelo") dated 1st day of March 2005

Whereas Curvelo is the assignee of a Promissory Note dated September 30, 2002 in
the amount of $25,000 USD plus interest thereon is due and payable by Royce as
of the date above written, and the Promissory Note is in default;

Whereas Royce acknowledges that the Promissory Note is in default;

Therefore in consideration for the receipt of one million common shares in the
capital of Royce, Curvelo hereby agrees not to seek legal enforcement of the
Promissory Note and interest thereon until March 31 2005.

/s/ Garcia Cordoba Guadalupe Xochinua          /s/ Donald Gee
-------------------------------------          -----------------------------
Authorized signatory                           Authorized signatory
Curvelo Trade & Finance Ltd.                   Royce Biomedical Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on
Form 10-K of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. Archbold, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 30, 2009



/s/ Michael G. ArchboldMichael G. ArchboldChief Financial and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of this Report.