alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Posner, Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 9, 2005



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth R. Posner                                                         
|Kenneth R. Posner                                                             
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer
WILLIAM BROWNING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0570

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 14, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

William Browning, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                       620
<INVENTORY>                                      8,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,511
<PP&E>                                          45,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,362
<BONDS>                                         36,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,868
<COMMON>                                         3,183
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,519
<SALES>                                         43,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,976
<CGS>                                           33,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,264
<INCOME-TAX>                                       781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,908
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 333-32065

                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $2,000,000,000
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series F
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series F
                Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

         Pricing Supplement, dated November 5, 1997 (the "Pricing Supplement")
to Prospectus Supplement, dated October 27, 1997 (the "Prospectus Supplement");
to Prospectus, dated October 27, 1997 (the "Base Prospectus" and collectively
with the Pricing Supplement and the Prospectus Supplement, the "Prospectus")

                              Description of Notes

         The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement
and modify, to the extent applicable, the description of general terms and
provisions of Citicorp's Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series F set forth in the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. Capitalized terms not defined
herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the accompanying
Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:                           6.20% Senior Notes Due November 10,
                                          2000 (the "Notes").

Aggregate
  Principal Amount:                       $20,000,000.00.

Issue Date:                               November 10, 1997.

Stated Maturity Date:                     November 10, 2000.

Interest Rate:                            6.20%.

Interest Commencement Date:               November 10, 1997.

Interest Payment Dates:                   Semi-annually, on the 10th of each May
                                          and November, commencing May 10, 1998,
                                          and at Stated Maturity.

Redemption:                               The Notes are not subject to
                                          redemption prior to the Maturity Date.

Sinking Fund:                             The Notes are not subject to any
                                          sinking fund.


                                        1
<PAGE>

Regular Record Dates:                     The date that is 15 calendar days
                                          prior to the related Interest Payment
                                          Date.

Purchaser:                                Prudential Securities Incorporated.

Discount:                                 .043%.

Price to Public:                          100.00%.

CUSIP Number:                             17303 LSQ 5.


                                        2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DoD-2008-DARS-0094]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 29, 2008.
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Part 229, Taxes, and related clause at DFARS 
252.229-7010; OMB Control Number 0704-0390.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 75.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 75.
    Average Burden per Response: 4 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 300.
    Needs and Uses: DoD uses this information to determine if DoD 
contractors in the United Kingdom have attempted to obtain relief from 
customs duty on vehicle fuels in accordance with contract requirements.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: August 22, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E8-20028 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A1 7 E0 05 1 . TRACY KUZ MI NSKY v . VI CKY CHAPMAN.

Th e d ead li n e f

o r f i l i ng a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s ju ri s d i ct i on al , s o t h i s co u rt i s wi t h o u t au t h o ri t y t o ret ro act i v el y ex t en d i t “ ev en o n gro u n d s s u ch as pro v i d en t i al

cau s e an d ex cu s ab l e n eg l ect .” Reg i s t er v. El l io t t , 2 8 5 Ga. Ap p

. 7 4 1 , 7 4 3 (6 4 7 S.E.2 d 4 0 6 ) (2 0 07 ). Bu t s ee Pi ed m o nt Ho s p ., In c. v. D.M. , 3 35 Ga. Ap p. 44 2 , 4 4 4 (1 ) (7 7 9 S.E.2 d 3 6 ) (2 0 1 5 ). Pet i t i on er’ s em erg en cy m o t i o n i s t h erefo re d en i ed

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 02, 2017

05/02/2017
Exhibit 99.1


Frontier Communications


3 High Ridge Park


Stamford, CT 06905


203.614.5600


www.frontier.com









Frontier Communications to Release Second-Quarter Results and Host Call








STAMFORD, Conn., June 30, 2011 -- Frontier Communications Corporation  (NYSE: FTR) plans to release second-quarter 2011 results on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 before the market opens and to host a conference call that day at 9:00 A.M. Eastern time.  The conference call will be Webcast and may be accessed at:




http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?p=irol-eventDetails&c=66508&eventID=4142282





A telephonic replay of the conference call will be available for one week beginning at 12:00 P.M. Eastern time, August 3, 2011 via dial-in at 888-203-1112 for U.S. and Canadian callers or, outside the U.S. and Canada, at 719-457-0820, passcode 7430604.  A Webcast replay of the call will be available at www.frontier.com/ir.









About Frontier Communications




Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE: FTR) offers voice, High-Speed Internet, satellite video, wireless Internet data access, data security solutions, bundled offerings, specialized bundles for small businesses and home offices, and advanced business communications for medium and large businesses in 27 states and with approximately 14,900 employees based entirely in the USA. More information is available at www.frontier.com and www.frontier.com/ir.








INVESTOR CONTACTS:


MEDIA CONTACT:David R. Whitehouse
Gregory H. Lundberg

Brigid M. SmithSVP & Treasurer
AVP, Assistant Treasurer & IR

AVP, Corporate Communications(203) 614-5708
(203) 614-5044

(203) 614-5042david.whitehouse@FTR.com
greg.lundberg@FTR.com

brigid.smith@FTR.com










###
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 699 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide complaint and 

burden of proof requirements for certain actions for breach of fiduciary 

duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2021 

Mr. EMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide 

complaint and burden of proof requirements for certain 

actions for breach of fiduciary duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mutual Fund Litiga5 tion Reform Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 699 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPLAINT AND BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR CERTAIN ACTIONS FOR BREACH 

3 OF FIDUCIARY DUTY. 

4 Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 

5 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–35(b)) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘(7) In any such action brought by a security 

8 holder of a registered investment company on behalf 

9 of such company— 

10 ‘‘(A) the complaint shall state with par11 ticularity all facts establishing a breach of fidu12 ciary duty, and, if an allegation of any such 

13 facts is based on information and belief, the 

14 complaint shall state with particularity all facts 

15 on which that belief is formed; and 

16 ‘‘(B) such security holder shall have the 

17 burden of proving a breach of fiduciary duty by 

18 clear and convincing evidence.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 18.1**

March 16, 2011 ****

Metals USA Holdings Corp. 

2400 East Commercial Boulevard, Suite 905 

FortLauderdale, Florida 33308 

Dear Sirs/Madams: 

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Metals USA Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the three years in theperiod ended December 31, 2010, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated March 16, 2011, which expresses an unqualified opinion. Note 13 to suchfinancial statements contains a description of your change during the year ended December 31, 2010 in the date of your annual goodwill impairment test from December 31 to October 31. In our judgment, such change is to an alternativeaccounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances. 

Yours truly, 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Houston, Texas
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

[CAPTION]
STATEMENT OF INCOME


(Dollars  in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

                                      Unaudited          Unaudited
                                   3 Months Ended      9 Months Ended
                                    September 30        September 30 
                                   1997      1996      1997      1996
<TABLE>
INCOME AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION:
     <S>                           <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
     Cash Rental                   $229      $229      $686      $686
     Interest                         -         -         -         -
                                    229       229       686       686

     Less general and 
          administrative expenses    21        24        64        70
 
               NET INCOME          $208      $205      $622      $616
     


Per Share:
(1,510,000 average shares outstanding)

     Net Income                    $ .14     $ .14     $ .41     $ .41
     Cash Dividends                  .13       .14       .41       .41

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6915 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include education on trailer 

safety in State highway safety programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2022 

Mr. BURCHETT (for himself and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include education 

on trailer safety in State highway safety programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trailer Safety Im5 provement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRAILER SAFETY PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 402(a)(2)(A) of title 23, United States Code, 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (xiii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6915 IH

1 (2) in clause (xiv) by striking the semicolon and 

2 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by inserting after clause (xiv) the following: 

4 ‘‘(xv) to educate the public about 

5 proper and safe usage of light- and me6 dium-duty trailers, including required safe7 ty equipment and preventive maintenance 

8 for safety;’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Lori Whitaker, as Administratrix of the Estate of William D. Whitaker, Deceased, Appellant, v Mercy Hospital, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Whitaker v Mercy Hosp.*([appeal No. 1] 163 AD2d 897 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BEAU PARRY, Individually and as Next

Friend to his Minor Daughters,

Appellant,

v.

JASON A. SHAFFER, VANEZA R.

SHAFFER, and TEAM TUTTLE, INC.

d/b/a LEGACY REAL ESTATE

SERVICES,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00 094

- CV

Appeal from the

120th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCV1811 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee s

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, all costs of appeal

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodrigu ez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Porta Systems Corp. (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William V. Carney, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Edward B. Kornfeld, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief that:
 
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ********Dated: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ William V.
    CarneyWilliam V. CarneyChief
      Executive Officer
  ****Dated: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Edward B.
    KornfeldEdward B. KornfeldPresident
      Chief
      Executive Officer
 
 This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Barrios, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered May 16, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant stands convicted of the robbery of the owner of a Queens furniture store committed with the assistance of an unapprehended accomplice. On appeal, the defendant contends that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt because of inconsistencies and discrepancies in the testimony of the People’s witnesses. Although certain discrepancies existed between the arresting officer’s memo book and his testimony at trial, and the witnesses’s accounts of the incident varied slightly, the apparent differences were not so great as to render their testimony incredible. In any event, the conflicting testimony presented a question of credibility for the trier-of-fact to resolve in the context of the totality of the evidence *(see, People v Jackson,*65 NY2d 265). It is well settled that issues of the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be accorded the evidence presented are primarily within the province of the trier-of-fact whose determination will not be overturned lightly on appeal *(see, People v Gruttola,*43 NY2d 116; *People v Mustafa,*132 AD2d 628; *People v Bauer,*113 AD2d 543, 551). Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We further find that the report of the arresting officer’s taped telephone call to the emergency 911 number did not constitute *Rosario*material *(People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286) in the context of this case, because the substance of the report did not relate to the subject matter of the witness’s trial testimony *(see,*CPL 240.45 [1] [a]; *People v Reedy,*70 NY2d 826; *People v Melendez,*149 AD2d 918; *cf., People v Kent,*125 AD2d 590).

Finally, the sentence imposed upon the defendant, with the most severe term of imprisonment being 6 to 12 years as a second violent felony offender upon the charge of robbery in the second degree, was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Nor should the mandatory surcharge be waived at *580this juncture. This court has consistently held that any application by a defendant for waiver of the mandatory surcharge due to indigency is premature while the defendant is incarcerated *(see, e.g., People v Velez,*150 AD2d 514; *People v Peralta,*127 AD2d 803, 804; *see also, People v West,*124 Misc 2d 622). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.