alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2404

_____________________________ O RIN B ATTLES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leo n County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

. January 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_ ____________________________2 Orin Battles, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1415

_____________________________

KENSHAWN JAMAR SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John T. Brown, Judge.

April 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 173 (Friday, September 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51834-51835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Chem Gas International LLC, as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Chem Gas International 
LLC, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Chem Gas International LLC, 12002 Highway 146, Dickinson, 
TX 77539, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum 
and petroleum products and organic chemicals for customs purposes, in 
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. 
Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service 
this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0f0e1c42000d0e041d2c08041f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ccafaebce2a0adaea4bd8ca8a4bfe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Chem Gas International LLC, as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 15, 2008. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.


[[Page 51835]]


    Dated: August 25, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-20678 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Donald S. BECK, Appellant, v. Marlon B. HOTCHKISS and Albert Gottlieb, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Oct. 26, 1954.

Nat L. Williams, Miami, for appellant.

Nathanson, Oka & Spaet, Miami Beach, for appellees.

DREW, Justice.

The notice of appeal in this case, recorded in the trial court on June 18, 1954, reads:

> “The plaintiff, Donald S. Beck, takes and enters his appeal to the Supreme Court of Florida, naming Marion B. Hotchkiss and Albert Gottlieb as appel-lees from the order denying motion for new trial made by the above-styled and entitled court in this cause on the 3rd day of June, A.D.1954, said order recorded in Order Book 252, at page 249, of the records of said court. This appeal is entered on the 16th day of June,' A.D.1954, and all parties to said cause are called upon to take notice of the entry of this appeal.”

On July 24, 1954 ^the transcript was filed in this Court. Parenthetically we note that this record contains no showing that a final judgment was entered in the cause. The brief of- appellant was filed on August 26, 1954, without request for oral argument. The appellees filed no brief within the time required by 30 F.S.A. Supreme Court Rule 20, and appellant recited that fact in a motion for final determination filed on October 6, 1954.

A mere reading of the notice of appeal reveals that the order from which appeal is sought is neither a final judgment within Section 59.02(1), F.S.1951, F.S.A. nor an order of a kind within the exceptions provided in Sections 59.03, 59.04 and 59.05, F.S.1951, F.S.A. The defect is jurisdictional qnd the appeal must be dismissed. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. *290Insurance Agents Finance Corp., Fla., 1950, 46 So.2d 169.

Appeal dismissed ex mero motu.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-72,137-29

EX PARTE FREDERICK DEWAYNE MALONE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-396-W011740-1128979-G IN THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Second

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Malone v. State, No. 02-08-00360-CR (Tex. App. — Fort

Worth March 1, 2010) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

We have previously dismissed five subsequent applications in this cause. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 4. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise grounds

that were previously rejected on the merits or that should have been raised in previous applications. 
2

We hold that Applicant has abused the writ and filed a frivolous lawsuit. See Ex parte Jones, 97

S.W.3d 586 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); TEX. GOV’T CODE § 498.0045(a-1). Should Applicant file

future habeas applications in this cause, we will not consider the merits of his applications unless

he shows that the factual or legal basis of his grounds was unavailable in a previously filed

application. This application is dismissed. 

Copies of this ordershall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Filed: February 24, 2021

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is
being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who are the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Omni
Financial Services, Inc. (the  issuer), hereby certify as follows:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the issuer for the period
ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 21st day of March, 2007.



| |  |                                                                           
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /S/    STEPHEN M.
KLEIN                                                   
| |  | Stephen M. Klein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                    
| | 
| |  | /S/    CONSTANCE E.
PERRINE                                               
| |  | Constance E. Perrine, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



105
Cash Fees Payable to Non-Employee Directors



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 Cash Fees Payable to 
 Non-Employee Directors of 
 Ceradyne, Inc. 
  

			
	Retainer	    	$4,000 per quarter
	Meeting fee	    	$1,000 per meeting(1)
	Telephonic meeting fee	    	$ 500 per meeting if longer than one hour
	Audit Committee Chair	    	$4,000 per year
	Compensation Committee Chair	    	$2,000 per year
	Lead Director	    	$4,000 per year



	(1)	No separate meeting fee is paid for Committee meetings held on the same day as a meeting of the full Board.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO ENRIQUE MARIN ROJAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71500

Agency No. A099-051-138

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Pablo Enrique Marin Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

JUL 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71500

§ 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Castillo-Perez v. INS, 212 F.3d 518,

523 (9th Cir. 2000), we deny the petition for review. 

The IJ properly concluded Rojas was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of

removal because he lacks a qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); see

also Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 2002) (denying

cancellation of removal where alien lacked a qualifying relative).

Rojas’ remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 99.1





Frontier Communications


3 High Ridge Park


Stamford, CT 06905


203.614.5600


www.frontier.com







Frontier Communications Corporation to Participate in Investor Conference




Stamford, Conn. – May 20, 2010 –Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE:FTR) is scheduled to participate in the upcoming Barclays Global Communications, Media, and Technology Conference in New York, NY.  Maggie Wilderotter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Donald Shassian, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, are scheduled to present on Wednesday, May 26, 2010, at 2:15 p.m. Eastern time.





A live webcast of the presentation will be available at www.frontier.com on the Investor Relations page under “Webcasts & Presentations.”






About Frontier Communications




Frontier Communications Corporation (NYSE: FTR) is a full-service communications provider and one of the largest local exchange telephone companies in the country serving rural areas and small and medium-sized towns and cities. Frontier is included in the S&P 500 Index. Frontier Communications offers telephone, television and Internet services, including wireless Internet data access, as well as bundled offerings, specialized bundles for small businesses and home offices, and data security solutions. Additional information about Frontier is available at www.frontier.com.










INVESTOR CONTACTS:


MEDIA CONTACT:David Whitehouse
Gregory Lundberg

Brigid SmithSVP & Treasurer
Director, Investor Relations

AVP Corp. Communications(203) 614-5708
(203) 614-5044

(203) 614-5042david.whitehouse@frontiercorp.com
greg.lundberg@frontiercorp.com

brigid.smith@frontiercorp.com










###
Order entered February 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01030-CR

RICKY PEDRO GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-81559-2011

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On January 24, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. On February 20, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, 

together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we 

VACATE the January 24, 2013 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the February 20, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed 

as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Unaudited
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      162955
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2607929
<ALLOWANCES>                               (248796)
<INVENTORY>                                  15328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2959749
<PP&E>                                    10636759
<DEPRECIATION>                            (1848958)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            11876961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5049211
<BONDS>                                    6194784
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1519
<OTHER-SE>                                  631447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              11876961
<SALES>                                    5819735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5821199
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5899291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (232312)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          278293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (353227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (353227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (353227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth
Square, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 11, 2005                       /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. 
Henkemeyer (D. Minn.), Civil Action No. 0:08-cv-05030-PJS-RLE, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the District of 
Minnesota on August 27, 2008.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Gerome G. Henkemeyer, Henkemeyer Landfill, Inc., 
and Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. (collectively ``the Defendants'') 
pursuant to section 309(b) and (d) of the Clean Water Act (``CWA''), 33 
U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose 
civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water 
Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the 
United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations 
by requiring the Defendants to restore the impacted areas, perform 
mitigation, and pay civil penalties.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Friedrich A.P. 
Siekert, Office of the United States Attorney for the District of 
Minnesota, 600 United States Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street, 
Minneapolis, MN 55415, and refer to United States v. Henkemeyer (D. 
Minn.), DJ <greek-i>90-5-1-1-17415.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, 202 United 
States Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55415. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Cherie Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E8-20258 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
#### GETER v. DE SOTO LUMBER CO. et al. (COMMERCIAL STANDARD INS. CO., Intervenor).

No. 6908.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 27, 1946.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1946.

Certiorari Denied June 14, 1946.

*315L. Y. Barnette and Edward S. Robertson, both of Shreveport, for appellant.

Colvin & Hunter, of Mansfield, for ap-pellees.

E. W. & P. N. Browne, of Shreveport, for intervenor.

McINNIS, Judge.

The plaintiff in this case sues to recover the sum of $15,000 for alleged injuries and medical expenses incurred by him in an accident on December 1, 1943, in which the Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., van truck he was driving was involved in an accident with a log truck belonging to defendant, DeSoto Lumber Company, and being driven at the time by Clyde L. Ford. The charges of negligence against the said Ford are substantially the same as those made in the answer filed in suit No. 6907 styled Ford v. Leonard Trust Lines, Inc., et al.; La.App., 26 So.2d 309, and the answer of the defendant- makes substantially the same charges of negligence against Geter as are made in the petition in the above suit No. 6907.

Later, by motion and consent of counsel, the Eagle Indemnity Company, as the insurer of defendant was also madeja party defendant in this case.

The Commercial Standard Insurance Company intervened in this suit, alleging that it carried a workmen’s compensation policy covering Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., and that it had paid to the plaintiff the sum of $1,298, for which it is legally subrogated to the rights of plaintiff in his claim for damages in this case.

On motion of the plaintiff this suit was consolidated for trial in the district court with suit No. 17945, styled Clyde L. Ford v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., et al.

There was judgment in the district court rejecting the demands of the plaintiff and the demands of the intervenor, Commercial Standard Insurance Company, and both have appealed from that judgment.

The issues and the evidence in this case are fully set forth and discussed in case No. 6907, Ford v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., et al., 26 So.2d 309, and for the reasons assigned therein, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at the costs of appellants.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 9, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00644

- CR

Elton Anthony BRANCH

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appell ee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7555

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The appellant’s brief in the above styled cause was due to be filed on January 28, 2015.

O n February 6, 2015

, Appellant Elton Anthony Branch filed his brief and a motion for extension

of time. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is deemed filed as of February 6, 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court