U.S. Department of Justice Insert OMB No. 

Office of Justice Programs 

National Institute of Justice 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) is pleased to announce that it is seeking applications for funding to operate a 

Corrections Technology Center of Excellence within the National Law Enforcement and 

Corrections Technology Center System (the “NLECTC System”). This program furthers the 

Department’s mission by sponsoring research to provide objective, independent, evidencebased knowledge and tools to meet the challenges of crime and justice, particularly at the State 

and local levels. 

Solicitation: 

Corrections Technology Center of 

Excellence 

Eligibility 

In general, NIJ is authorized to make grants to, or enter into contracts or cooperative 

agreements with, States (including territories), local governments (including federallyrecognized Indian tribal governments as determined by the Secretary of the Interior and 

published in the Federal Register), nonprofit and profit organizations (including tribal nonprofit 

and profit organizations), institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions of higher 

education), and certain qualified individuals. Foreign governments, foreign organizations, and 

foreign institutions of higher education are not eligible to apply. 

Deadline 

Registration with OJP’s Grant Management System (GMS) is required prior to application 

submission. (See “How to Apply,” page 9.) 

All applications are due by 11:45 p.m. eastern time on March 12, 2010. 

(See “Deadlines: Registration and Application,” page 3.) 

Contact Information 

For technical assistance with submitting the application, contact the Grants Management 

System Support Hotline at 1–888–549–9901, option 3 or via e-mail to 

GMSHelpDesk@usdoj.gov. 

Note: The GMS Support Hotline hours of operation are Monday-Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 

midnight eastern time, except for Federal holidays. 

For assistance with any other requirement of this solicitation, contact Jack Harne, Physical 

Scientist, at 202–616–2911 or by e-mail to jack.harne@usdoj.gov. 

SL# 000891 
CONTENTS 

Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3
 

Deadlines: Registration and Application ........................................................................... 3 

Eligibility ............................................................................................................................ 3 

Specific Information .......................................................................................................... 3 

Performance Measures ..................................................................................................... 9 

How to Apply..................................................................................................................... 9 

What an Application Must Include................................................................................... 11 

Standard Form 424 ............................................................................................. 11 

Program Narrative ............................................................................................... 11 

Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative ................................................. 12 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) ...................................................... 13 

Plan for Collecting the Data Required for Performance Measures ..................... 13 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable)........................................................ 13 

Other Standard Forms ........................................................................................ 13 

Selection Criteria............................................................................................................. 14 

Review Process .............................................................................................................. 15 

Additional Requirements................................................................................................. 16 

Application Checklist....................................................................................................... 18 

2
 
Corrections Technology Center of Excellence 

CFDA No. 16.560 

Overview 

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is the research, development, and evaluation agency of 

the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and a component of the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). 

NIJ provides objective, independent, evidence-based knowledge and tools to enhance the 

administration of justice and public safety. NIJ solicits applications to inform its search for the 

knowledge and tools to guide policy and practice. 

NIJ seeks qualified applicants to operate a Corrections Technology Center of Excellence (“the 

Center”) within the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center System (“the 

NLECTC System”). The work that this new center will perform is currently being performed by 

the Weapons and Protective Systems Technology Center of Excellence (WPSTC). The WPSTC 

has been operated since 2007 by the Pennsylvania State University in collaboration with the 

University of Denver. 

Authorizing Legislation: Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (sections 201 

and 202); Homeland Security Act of 2002 (section 232). 

Deadlines: Registration and Application 

Registration is required prior to submission. The deadline to register in GMS is 11:45 p.m. 

eastern time on March 12, 2010 and the deadline for applying for funding under this 

announcement is 11:45 p.m. eastern time on March 12, 2010. Please see the “How to Apply” 

section, page 9, for more details. 

Eligibility 

Please refer to the title page for eligibility information under this program. 

Specific Information—Corrections Technology Center of 

Excellence 

NIJ, through its Office of Science and Technology (OST), is the national focal point for work on 

law enforcement technologies, including corrections, investigative, and forensic technologies, as 

well as technologies that support the judicial process. NIJ administers programs that improve 

the safety and effectiveness of, and criminal justice agency access to, these technologies. NIJ’s 

Science and Technology (S&T) program consists of 19 technology investment portfolios. The 

Center will support two of these: (1) Community Corrections and (2) Institutional Corrections. 

The NLECTC System is an integral part of NIJ's S&T program. It provides scientific and 

technical support to NIJ’s research and development efforts; supports the demonstration, 

transfer, and adoption of technology into practice by law enforcement and corrections agencies, 

courts, and crime laboratories; assists in the development and dissemination of technology 

guidelines and standards; and provides technology assistance, information, and support to law 

enforcement and corrections agencies, courts, and crime laboratories. 

3
 
The Centers of Excellence work with the NLECTC National and Regional Centers and the Office 

of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology as 

part of an integrated NLECTC System. The National Center serves as the clearinghouse for 

technology information and executes NIJ's compliance testing program. The Regional Centers 

serve as the initial point of entry for law enforcement practitioners to the NLECTC System and 

provide generalized technology assistance to law enforcement and corrections agencies, public 

crime laboratories, and judicial agencies in their regions. They also forward requests for 

specialized assistance to the appropriate Center of Excellence, and, as necessary, coordinate 

technology demonstrations and evaluations sponsored by a Center of Excellence with agencies 

within their regions. 

The Centers of Excellence are the authoritative resource within the NLECTC System for both 

practitioners and developers in their technology area(s) of focus. The technology areas of focus 

of the proposed Corrections Technology Center of Excellence are institutional and community 

corrections. The primary role of the Centers of Excellence is to assist in the transition of law 

enforcement technology from the laboratory into practice by first adopters within the criminal 

justice community. To that end, successful applicants must be knowledgeable of both 

practitioner requirements and potential technology solutions, including those developed through 

NIJ and other sources. 

Specific tasks that the Center will be expected to perform include: 

Identifying technology requirements. The Center will accomplish this principally by hosting 

and supporting relevant Technology Working Group (TWG) activities. The Center will also be 

expected to conduct relevant, focused studies to support program development, and participate 

in relevant technical conferences and symposia. 

The Center will host and support the Institutional Corrections and the Community Corrections 

TWGs. TWGs typically consist of 20 expert practitioners knowledgeable in the operational 

employment of the technology addressed in a particular portfolio. They assist NIJ in identifying 

technology gaps in a portfolio area in terms of operational requirements and desired outcomes. 

They also assist NIJ in reviewing ongoing technology projects and potential new projects. TWGs 

facilitate outreach and assist in facilitating technology demonstrations and evaluations. 

TWGs normally meet twice a year. A three-day meeting, exclusive of travel time, is 

representative. Venues will vary, but sites in the Washington, DC area are preferred. 

In supporting these TWGs, the Center will, in close coordination with the relevant NIJ program 

manager: 

•	 Identify the key agencies, professional organizations, and individual practitioners that should 

participate in a particular TWG; 

•	 Schedule TWG meetings; 

•	 Develop meeting agendas; 

•	 Secure a venue and required logistic services, including audiovisual support; 

•	 Pay the travel and per diem expenses, but not the salaries, of the non-Federal participants; 

•	 Moderate the meetings; and 

•	 Record and publish the proceedings. 

4
 
Supporting NIJ’s research and development programs. In the areas of institutional and 

community corrections, the Center is expected to help the NIJ program manager define program 

objectives; assess ongoing research and development projects; find relevant technology efforts 

for NIJ collaboration; and participate in national and regional groups that support the adoption of 

technology. As part of its effort, the Center will develop working groups to evaluate state-of-theart commercially available corrections technology. Working groups will be composed of subject 

matter experts with relevant expertise to determine desired compatible technology solutions. 

Testing, evaluating, and demonstrating technologies. The Center will be expected to focus 

its efforts primarily on the demonstration of new correctional technologies in field environments. 

Demonstrations must be designed to determine whether a technology meets all of the 

assessment criteria for a technology need area and to develop guidelines for the adoption of the 

technology by other practitioners. To the greatest extent feasible, demonstrations should also 

be designed to determine criminal justice outcomes through evaluation research in collaboration 

with the NIJ program manger and with NIJ’s Office of Research and Evaluation. Findings will be 

disseminated through reports, conferences, standards, and technology assistance activities. 

Viable projects may include: 

•	 Viability of Accelerometers in Correctional Applications. 

o	 The use of accelerometer technology in corrections is generally unexplored; 

however, great potential may exist in a number of areas. For example, 

accelerometers may be viable as an alternative method of heartbeat detection to 

detect escape attempts; may allow for improved perimeter security sensors; and may 

provide a biosensor solution to monitor heartbeats of inmates on suicide watch or 

being held in four-point restraints. The outcome will be a thorough exploration of the 

potential of this technology in a correctional environment. 

•	 Assessment of Language Translation Technologies. 

o	 A variety of language translation technologies are currently available; some are in 

use in correctional facilities. However, an independent assessment is needed to 

create a gap analysis to document what needs are not being met with current 

technology. The deliverable will be a research report that addresses the questions 

raised. 

•	 Operational Evaluation of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Technology. 

o	 Near-infrared spectroscopy technology is an emerging approach to noninvasive 

alcohol testing. Community corrections agencies require objective information about 

the technology and its potential applications in the field. The project will provide 

objective data on the usefulness of this technology in an operational setting. 

•	 Evaluation of the Impact of Technology in Corrections. 

o	 Technology is often deployed without the benefit of analysis and appropriate 

methodology. As a result, agencies only have anecdotal evidence regarding whether 

the implementation was successful. Therefore an evaluation of a variety of 

technologies is necessary to determine the impact of the technology in the 

correctional setting. Methodology should include pre- and posttesting on various 

critical metrics, cost-benefit analysis, impact on staff, impact on offenders, etc. 

5
 
Supporting the adoption of new technology. The Center’s efforts will focus on facilitating the 

effective transfer into practice of new tools and technologies that meet corrections needs, 

including those funded by NIJ and others. Efforts may include introducing new tools and 

technologies to the practitioner, introducing practitioner requirements to developers, and 

assisting developers in the commercialization of their products. Commercialization activities are 

to include providing feedback to technology developers in the criminal justice marketplace, 

describing criminal justice requirements and practices, providing opportunities for demonstration 

of technologies, and presenting strategies for the commercialization of developers’ technologies 

to the Center will play a vital role in providing practitioner agencies access to new technologies 

and improved capabilities. NIJ will not provide direct financial assistance to companies to 

commercialize products. NIJ may, however, support pilot programs for first adopters of new 

technology, particularly those that evaluate the effectiveness of a technology or develop best 

practices for the use of a technology. NIJ also encourages support for existing corrections 

technology assessment working groups and the establishment of new working groups. The 

Center would be responsible for management and coordination of working groups composed of 

subject matter experts with relevant expertise to evaluate state-of-the-art commercially available 

corrections technology that can be transferred to correctional agencies. 

Developing technology guidelines and standards. The Center’s efforts include the 

development of comprehensive guides for corrections and other appropriate criminal justice 

practitioners that describe how to plan for, select, and implement technology solutions based on 

actual practical experience with the technology in both institutional and community correctional 

settings. 

As part of its efforts, the Center is expected to continue a current program to establish new 

equipment standards for offender-tracking technologies, which is the direct result of 

recommendations from the Community Corrections TWG. The NIJ standard development 

process will be followed involving the establishment of a Special Technical Committee (STC) of 

experts to produce three documents: the standard, the certification program requirements, and 

the selection and application guide. 

Providing technology assistance and support to criminal justice agencies on a national 

basis. The Center is expected to provide all of the NLECTC System's specialized technology 

assistance within its particular technology areas of responsibility. These efforts will focus on 

providing science and engineering advice and support to assist first-adopter corrections 

agencies with the use of new technologies or the adaptation of existing technologies to enhance 

their effectiveness, efficiency, and safety. The Center is expected to provide national expertise 

for the criminal justice community’s ongoing efforts to continuously improve operations through 

the adoption of new tools and methods. (Note: The Center will not fund or provide assistance to 

agencies that are adopting technologies that are well established in practice.) Appropriate 

assistance will be provided to all facets of the corrections community, including large, small, 

tribal, and rural. 

As part of these efforts, the Center shall implement the following projects: 

•	 Web-Based Corrections Resource Center. Management and coordination of a 

Corrections Technology Resource Center, a password-protected Web forum that makes 

information available on current and emerging technologies, vender contact data, and 

practitioner information. This Web-based resource will be maintained on the NLECTC 

System’s Justice Information Network (JUSTNET) or linked to JUSTNET. It is envisioned 

6
 
 

 

that this center will be the principal means through which the Center will provide technology 

assistance and support. 

•	 Technology Institute for Corrections. Management and coordination of an annual event 

designed for corrections managers to learn about and discuss technology initiatives and 

issues affecting the corrections community. During the week-long institute event, attendees 

will receive and exchange information about existing and developing technologies, engage 

in problem-solving related to technology implementation, and share technology lessons 

learned. 

•	 Innovative Technology for Corrections Conference. Management and coordination of a 

conference that explores practical applications of innovative corrections technologies that 

currently are in use as well as those not yet available. Attendees would be corrections 

administrators, supervisors, and line staff from Federal, State, and local agencies with 

responsibility for and/or strong interest in learning about technology’s role in corrections. 

While the Center will, to a certain extent, perform ongoing work related to responding to calls for 

assistance forwarded from the Regional Technology Centers, the Center should expect that the 

majority of its work will be on projects specifically defined by NIJ in support of the specific 

technology investment portfolio areas.1

 For this reason and others (such as the possibility of 

establishment, modification, or elimination of particular technology investment portfolios by NIJ; 

changes in the availability of funds; or the desire to capitalize on technology opportunities), 

applicants should expect that the level of effort may vary significantly during the project period 

(or from year to year, should supplemental funding be made available). The successful 

applicant therefore must demonstrate the ability to readily add or reduce capacity in relevant 

areas under the guidance of the NIJ program manager without adversely affecting the ability to 

provide services or incurring unacceptable additional costs. In this connection, NIJ is very 

interested in entertaining applications that propose to leverage existing programs, facilities, and 

personnel. 

Please note: All applicants under this solicitation must comply with Department of Justice 

regulations on confidentiality and human subjects protection. See “Other Requirements for OJP 

Applications” at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/other_requirements.htm. 

What will not be funded: 

1. Provision of training or direct service. 

2. Proposals primarily to purchase equipment, materials, or supplies. (Your budget may 

include these items if they are necessary to conduct applied research, development, 

demonstration, evaluation, or analysis.) 

3. Work that will be funded under another specific solicitation. 

4. Applications that propose to develop technology. 

Amount and length of awards: This solicitation is expected to result in one award. Total 

funding for the first 12-month period of performance under that award is anticipated to be up to 

$1 million. All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any 

modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by law. 

1

 NIJ intends to make this award through a cooperative agreement. 

7
 
Applicants should be aware that the total period for an award, including one that receives 

additional funding, ordinarily will not exceed 3 years. A grant made by NIJ under this solicitation 

may account for up to 100 percent of the total cost of the project. See "Cofunding" under "What 

an Application Must Include." 

Budget Information 

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver: No portion of any 

award of more than $250,000 made under this solicitation may be used to pay total cash 

compensation (salary plus bonuses) to any employee of the award recipient at a rate that 

exceeds 110% of the maximum annual salary payable to a member of the Federal 

Government’s Senior Executive Service (SES) at an agency with a Certified SES Performance 

Appraisal System for that year. (The 2010 salary table for SES employees is available at 

http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/indexSES.asp.) Note: A recipient may compensate an 

employee at a higher rate, provided the amount in excess of this compensation limitation is paid 

with non-Federal funds. (Any such additional compensation will not be considered matching 

funds where match requirements apply.) 

The limitation on compensation rates allowable under an award may be waived on an individual 

basis at the discretion of the Director of the National Institute of Justice. An applicant that 

wishes to request a waiver must include a detailed justification in the budget narrative of its 

application. Unless the applicant submits a waiver request and justification with the application, 

the applicant should anticipate that OJP will request that the applicant adjust and resubmit its 

budget. 

The justification should include: the particular qualifications and expertise of the individual, the 

uniqueness of the service being provided, the individual’s specific knowledge of the program or 

project being undertaken with award funds, and a statement explaining that the individual’s 

salary is commensurate with the regular and customary rate for an individual with his/her 

qualifications and expertise, and for the work that is to be done. 

8
 
 

Performance Measures 

To assist in fulfilling the Department’s responsibilities under the Government Performance and 

Results Act (GPRA), P.L. 103–62, applicants who receive funding under this solicitation must 

provide data that measure the results of their work. Additionally, applicants must discuss in their 

application their methods for collecting data for performance measures. Please refer to “What 

an Application Must Include,” page 11, for additional information on applicant responsibilities for 

collecting and reporting data. Performance measures for this solicitation are as follows: 

Objective Performance Measure(s) Data Grantee Provides 

To facilitate the adoption of new 

tools and technologies into practice 

by criminal justice agencies through 

testing, evaluation, and the 

provision of technology assistance. 

1. Relevance to the needs of the 

field as measured by whether the 

grantee’s substantive scope did 

not deviate from the funded 

proposal or any subsequent 

agency modifications to the 

scope. 

2. Quality of the research as 

assessed by peer reviewers. 

3. Quality of management as 

measured by whether significant 

interim project milestones were 

achieved, final deadlines were 

met, and costs remained within 

approved limits. 

4. If applicable, number of NIJ final 

grant reports, NIJ research 

documents, and grantee research 

documents published. 

1. Individual project reports 

responding to the requirements 

of a specific project detailing the 

Center's activities including: the 

number of research, testing and 

evaluation, and demonstration 

activities conducted; the number 

of technologies successfully 

adopted into service; the number 

of technology guides published; 

the number of calls for 

assistance responded to. 

2. A final report providing a 

comprehensive overview of the 

project and a detailed description 

of the project design, data, and 

methods; a full presentation of 

scientific findings; and a 

thorough discussion of the 

implications of the project 

findings for criminal justice 

practice and policy in the United 

States. 

3. Quarterly financial reports, semiannual progress reports, and a 

final progress report. 

4. If applicable, each data set that 

was collected, acquired, or 

modified in conjunction with the 

project. 

5. If applicable, citation to 

report(s)/document(s). 

How to Apply 

Applications will be submitted through OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS). GMS is a 

Web-based, data-driven computer application that provides cradle to grave support for the 

application, award and management of grants at OJP. Applicants should begin the process 

immediately to meet the GMS registration deadline, especially if this is the first time they have 

used the system. Complete instructions on how to register and submit an application in GMS 

can be found at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmscbt/. If you experience technical difficulties at any point 

9
 
during this process, please e-mail GMSHelpDesk@usdoj.gov, or call 1–888–549–9901 (option 

3), Monday–Friday from 6:00 a.m. to midnight eastern time, except for Federal holidays. OJP 

highly recommends starting the registration process as early as possible to prevent delays in 

the application submission by the specified deadline. 

All applicants are required to complete the following steps. 

1. Acquire a DUNS Number. A DUNS number is required to submit an application in 

GMS. The Office of Management and Budget requires that all businesses and nonprofit 

applicants for Federal funds include a DUNS (Data Universal Numbering System) 

number in their application for a new award or renewal of an existing award. A DUNS 

number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for 

identifying and keeping track of entities receiving Federal funds. The identifier is used for 

tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for Federal 

assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS number will be used 

throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one-time activity. 

Obtain a DUNS number by calling 1–866–705–5711 or by applying online at 

www.dunandbradstreet.com. Individuals are exempt from this requirement. 

2. Acquire or Renew Registration with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) 

Database. CCR registration is required to receive funding. OJP requires that all 

applicants (other than individuals) for Federal financial assistance maintain current 

registrations in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. The CCR database 

is the repository for standard information about Federal financial assistance applicants, 

recipients, and subrecipients. Organizations that have previously submitted applications 

via Grants.gov are already registered with CCR, as it is a requirement for Grants.gov 

registration. Please note, however, that applicants must update or renew their CCR 

registration at least once per year to maintain an active status. Information about CCR 

registration procedures can be accessed at www.ccr.gov. 

3. Acquire a GMS Username and Password. If you are a new user, please create a GMS 

profile by selecting the first time user link under the sign-in box of the GMS home page. 

For more information on how to register in GMS, go to www.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmscbt/. 

4. Search for the Funding Opportunity on GMS. After you log in to GMS or complete 

your GMS profile for your username and password, go to the Funding Opportunities link 

on the left hand side of the page. Please select “National Institute of Justice” and then 

“NIJ FY 10 Corrections Technology Center of Excellence.” 

5. Select the Apply Online Button Associated with the Solicitation Title. The search 

results from step 4 will display the solicitation title along with the Registration and 

Application Deadlines for this funding opportunity. Please select the Apply Online button 

in the Action Column to create an application in the system. 

6. Submit an Application Addressing All of the Requirements Outlined in this 

Solicitation by Following the Directions in GMS. Once submitted, GMS will display a 

confirmation screen stating your submission was successful. Important: You are urged 

to submit your application at least 72 hours prior to the due date of the application. 

Note: OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS) does not accept executable file types as 

application attachments. These disallowed file types include, but are not limited to, the 

10
 
following extensions: ".com," ".bat," ".exe," ".vbs," ".cfg," ".dat," ".db," ".dbf," ".dll," ".ini," ".log," 

".ora," ".sys," and ".zip." 

Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues 

If you experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond your control which prevent you from 

submitting your application by the deadline, you must contact the NIJ staff member listed on the 

title page within 24 hours after the deadline and request approval to submit your application. 

At that time, NIJ staff will require you to e-mail the complete grant application, your DUNS 

number, and provide a GMS Help Desk tracking number(s). After the program office reviews all 

of the information submitted, and contacts the GMS Helpdesk to validate the technical issues 

you reported, OJP will contact you to either approve or deny your request to submit a late 

application. If the technical issues you reported cannot be validated, your application will be 

rejected as untimely. 

To ensure a fair competition for limited discretionary funds, the following conditions are not valid 

reasons to permit late submissions: (1) failure to begin the registration process in sufficient time; 

(2) failure to follow GMS instructions on how to register and apply as posted on its Web site; (3) 

failure to follow all of the instructions in the OJP solicitation; and (4) technical issues 

experienced with the applicant’s computer or information technology (IT) environment. 

Notifications regarding known technical problems with GMS are posted on the OJP funding Web 

page, www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/solicitations.htm. 

What an Application Must Include 

OJP strongly recommends use of appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., “Program 

Narrative,” “Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative,” “Timelines,” “Memoranda of 

Understanding,” “Resumes”) for all required attachments. Where resumes are required, OJP 

recommends that all resumes be included in a single file. 

Standard Form 424 

Please see www07.grants.gov/assets/SF424Instructions.pdf for instructions on how to 

complete your SF424. When selecting "type of applicant," if the applicant is a for-profit 

entity, please select "For-Profit Organization" or "Small Business" (as applicable) in the 

Type of Applicant 1 data field. For-profit applicants also may select additional applicable 

categories (e.g., "Private Institution of Higher Education"). 

 Program Narrative 

The Program Narrative includes: 

a. Cover page 

b. Abstract (not to exceed 600 words). 

c. Table of contents. 

d. Main body, which includes: 

• Purpose, goals, and objectives. 

• Review of relevant literature. 

• Approach to achieving goals and objectives (program design and 

implementation). 

• Research independence and integrity (see “Selection Criteria,” below). 

• Implications for criminal justice policy and practice in the United States. 

11
 
• Management plan and organization. 

• Dissemination strategy. 

e. Appendices (not counted against program narrative page limit) include: 

• Bibliography/References (if applicable). 

• List of key personnel (required). 

• Resumes of key personnel (required). 

• List of previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigator(s) (required). 

• Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from 

organizations collaborating in the project (if applicable). 

• Chart for timeline, research calendar, or milestones (required). 

• Human Subjects Protection Paperwork including Institutional Review 

Board (IRB) documentation and forms (see 

http://www.ojp.gov/nij/funding/humansubjects/human-subjects.htm). 

• Privacy Certificate (for further guidance go to 

http://www.ojp.gov/nij/funding/humansubjects/privacy-certificateguidance.htm). 

• List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which you 

have submitted this proposal (if applicable). 

• Other materials required by the solicitation. 

The program narrative section of your application must not exceed 25 double-spaced 

pages in 12-point font with 1-inch margins. Abstract, table of contents, charts, figures, 

appendices, and government forms do not count toward the 25-page limit for the 

narrative section. 

Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative 

A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found at 

www.ojp.gov/funding/forms/budget_detail.pdf. If you submit a different format, you must 

include the budget categories as listed in the sample Budget Detail Worksheet. 

For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs, 

please see the OJP Financial Guide at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm 

The Budget Narrative is a plain-language description of each of the proposed 

expenditures listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. It should clearly explain the purpose 

and reason for all expenditures in the budget. There should be no ambiguities about any 

budget item. The narrative also should include details for calculated rates or other 

figures. As with the Budget Detail Worksheet, the Budget Narrative must be broken 

down on a year-by-year basis. 

Cofunding: A grant made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 

percent of the total cost of the project. You must indicate whether you believe it is 

feasible for you to contribute cash, facilities, or services as non-Federal support for the 

project. Your application should identify generally any such contributions that you expect 

to make and your proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, will be 

supported with non-Federal contributions. 

12
 
Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 

Applicants that do not have a federally negotiated indirect cost rate and wish to establish 

one can submit a proposal to their “cognizant” Federal agency. Generally, the cognizant 

Federal agency is the agency that provides the preponderance of direct Federal funding. 

This can be determined by reviewing an organization’s schedule of Federal financial 

assistance. If DOJ is your cognizant Federal agency, obtain information needed to 

submit an indirect cost rate proposal at 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/part3/part3chap17.htm. 

Plan for collecting the data required for performance measures. (See 

"Performance Measures," above.) 

The Data Collection Plan is a description of the applicant’s plan for collecting the data 

required for performance measures. Applicants must discuss this plan in their 

applications. The plan must describe how the performance measures data will be 

derived, state who will be responsible for collecting the data, and state that the data will 

be available for review 3 years post award, as required. The data collection plan should 

be rigorous to ensure that the performance measure data provided are accurate, 

auditable, and correctly measure the impact of the Federal funds provided. 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) 

If an application is being submitted by either (1) a tribe or tribal organization, or (2) by a 

third party proposing to provide direct services or assistance to residents on tribal lands, 

then a current authorizing resolution of the governing body of the tribal entity or other 

enactment of the tribal council or comparable governing body authorizing the inclusion of 

the tribe or tribal organization and its residents must be included with the application. In 

those instances when an organization or consortium of tribes proposes to apply for a 

grant on behalf of a tribe or multiple specific tribes, then the application must include a 

resolution from all tribes that will be included as a part of the services/assistance 

provided under the grant. 

If an applicant is unable to obtain a signed copy of a tribal resolution documenting 

support for its application, then, at a minimum, the applicant must submit an unsigned, 

draft tribal resolution as part of its application. If an applicant fails to submit either a 

signed or an unsigned copy of a tribal resolution as part of its application, then it will be 

eliminated from funding consideration. If selected for funding, any applicant that has 

submitted an unsigned tribal resolution must submit the signed copy of the tribal 

resolution to OJP within 30 days of acceptance of the award. In all such cases, use of 

and access to funds will be contingent on receipt of the signed tribal resolution. 

Other Standard Forms 

Additional forms that may be required are available on OJP’s funding page at 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/forms.htm. Please note in particular the following 

forms. 

1. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other 

Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (required of all 

applicants as part of the GMS application process) 

13
 
2. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (required for any applicant that expends any 

funds for lobbying activities) 

3. Accounting System and Financial Capability Questionnaire (required for any 

applicant that is a nongovernmental entity and that has not received any award 

from OJP within the past 3 years) 

4. Standard Assurances (required of all applicants as part of the GMS application 

process) 

Note: Attachments to the application should be included in one of the following four 

categories: 1) Program Narrative; 2) Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative; 3) 

Appendices; and 4) Other Requirements. 

Selection Criteria 

Statement of the Problem (Understanding of the problem and its importance)— 15% 

Project/Program Design and Implementation (Quality and technical merit)— 30% 

1. Awareness of the state of current research or technology. 

2. Soundness of methodology and analytic and technical approach. 

3. Feasibility of proposed project and awareness of pitfalls. 

4. Innovation and creativity (when appropriate). 

Capabilities/Competencies (Capabilities, demonstrated productivity, and experience of 

applicants)—20% 

1. Qualifications and experience of proposed staff. 

2. Demonstrated ability of proposed staff and organization to manage the effort. 

3. Adequacy of the plan to manage the project, including how various tasks are subdivided 

and resources are used. 

4. Successful past performance on NIJ grants and contracts (when applicable). 

Budget—15% 

1. Total cost of the project relative to the perceived benefit. 

2. Appropriateness of the budget relative to the level of effort. 

3. Use of existing resources to conserve costs. 

Impact/Outcomes and Evaluation/Plan for Collecting Data for Performance Measures 

(Relevance to policy and practice)—15% 

1. Potential for significant advances in scientific or technical understanding of the problem. 

2. Potential for significant advances in the field. 

3. Relevance for improving the policy and practice of criminal justice and related agencies 

in the United States and improving public safety, security, and quality of life. 

4. Affordability and cost-effectiveness of proposed end products, when applicable (e.g., 

purchase price and maintenance costs for a new technology or cost of training to use the 

technology). 

5. Perceived potential for commercialization and/or implementation of a new technology 

(when applicable). 

14
 
Relevance of the project for policy and practice in the United States 

Higher quality applications clearly explain the practical implications of the project. They 

connect technical expertise with criminal justice policy and practice. To ensure that the 

project has strong relevance for policy and practice, some researchers and technologists 

collaborate with practitioners and policymakers. You may include letters showing support 

from practitioners, but they carry less weight than clear evidence that you understand why 

policymakers and practitioners would benefit from your work and how they would use it. 

While a partnership may affect State or local activities, it should also have broader 

implications for others across the country. 

Dissemination Strategy—5% 

1. Well-defined plan for the grant recipient to disseminate results to appropriate audiences, 

including researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. 

2. Suggestions for print and electronic products NIJ might develop for practitioners and 

policymakers. 

Research Independence and Integrity 

Regardless of a proposal’s rating under the criteria outlined above, in order to receive funds, the 

applicant’s proposal must demonstrate research independence, including appropriate 

safeguards to ensure research objectivity and integrity. 

Considerations in evaluating research independence and integrity will include, but may not be 

limited to, the adequacy of the applicant’s efforts to identify factors that could affect the 

objectivity/integrity of the proposed staff and/or the organization in carrying out the research, 

development, or evaluation activity; and the adequacy of the applicant’s existing or proposed 

remedies to control any such factors. 

Review Process 

OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. NIJ reviews the 

application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, 

measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with basic minimum program or legislative 

requirements as stated in the solicitation (including, but not limited to, requirements as to 

timeliness, proper format, and responsiveness to the scope of the solicitation). 

Peer reviewers will be reviewing the applications submitted under this solicitation that meet 

basic minimum requirements. NIJ may use either internal peer reviewers, external peer 

reviewers, or a combination to review the applications under this solicitation. An external peer 

reviewer is an expert in the field of the subject matter of a given solicitation who is NOT a 

current U.S. Department of Justice employee. An internal reviewer is a current U.S. Department 

of Justice employee who is well-versed or has expertise in the subject matter of this solicitation. 

Eligible applications will be evaluated, scored, and rated by a peer review panel. Peer 

reviewers’ ratings and any resulting recommendations are advisory only. In addition to peer 

review ratings, considerations for award recommendations and decisions may include, but are 

not limited to, underserved populations, geographic diversity, strategic priorities, past 

performance, and available funding. 

15
 
The Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO), in consultation with NIJ, conducts a financial 

review of applications for potential discretionary awards and cooperative agreements to 

evaluate the fiscal integrity and financial capability of applicants; examines proposed costs to 

determine if the budget and budget narrative accurately explain project costs; and determines 

whether costs are reasonable, necessary, and allowable under applicable Federal cost 

principles and agency regulations. 

All final award decisions will be made by the Director of the National Institute of Justice, who 

also may give consideration to factors including, but not limited to, underserved populations, 

geographic diversity, strategic priorities, past performance, and available funding when making 

awards. 

Additional Requirements 

Applicants selected for awards must agree to comply with additional legal requirements upon 

acceptance of an award. We strongly encourage you to review the information pertaining to 

these additional requirements prior to submitting your application. Additional information for 

each can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/other_requirements.htm. 

• Civil Rights Compliance 

• Faith-Based and Other Community Organizations 

• Confidentiality and Human Subjects Protection (if applicable) 

• Anti-Lobbying Act 

• Financial and Government Audit Requirements 

• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (if applicable) 

• DOJ Information Technology Standards (if applicable) 

• Single Point of Contact Review 

• Nonsupplanting of State or Local Funds 

• Criminal Penalty for False Statements 

• Compliance with Office of Justice Programs Financial Guide 

• Suspension or Termination of Funding 

• Nonprofit Organizations 

• For-Profit Organizations 

• Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) 

• Rights in Intellectual Property 

16
 
• Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006 

• Awards in excess of $5,000,000 – Federal taxes certification requirement 

If your proposal is funded, you will be required to submit several reports and other materials, 

including: 

Final substantive report: The final report should be a comprehensive overview of the project 

and should include a detailed description of the project design, data, and methods; a full 

presentation of scientific findings; a thorough discussion of the implications of the project 

findings for criminal justice practice and policy in the United States; etc. It must contain an 

abstract of no more than 600 words and an executive summary of 2,500 to 4,000 words. 

A draft of the final report, abstract, and executive summary must be submitted 90 days before 

the end date of the grant. The draft final report will be peer reviewed upon submission. The 

reviews will be forwarded to the grantee with suggestions for revisions. The author must then 

submit the revised final report, abstract, and executive summary by the end date of the grant. 

The abstract, executive summary, and final report must be submitted in both paper and 

electronic formats. 

For program evaluation studies, the final report should include a section on measuring program 

performance. This section should outline the measures used to evaluate program effectiveness, 

modifications made to those measures as a result of the evaluation, and recommendations 

regarding these and other potential performance measures for similar programs. (This 

information will be particularly valuable to NIJ and other Federal program agencies in 

implementing performance measures for federally funded criminal justice programs.) 

Interim reports: Grantees must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual progress 

reports, a final progress report, and, if applicable, an annual audit report in accordance with 

Office of Management and Budget Circular A–133. Future awards and fund drawdowns may be 

withheld if reports are delinquent. 

17
 
 

 

Application Checklist 

Corrections Technology Center of Excellence 

The application checklist has been created to aid you in developing your application. 

Eligibility 

_____ Tribal authorizing resolution (if applicable) 

Application Components: 

_____ Program Narrative (see pages 11–12 and “Selection Criteria,” pages 14–15) 

_____ Appendices to the Program Narrative 

_____ Bibliography/References (if applicable) 

_____ List of key personnel (required) 

_____ Resumes of key personnel (required) 

_____ List of previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigators (required) 

_____ Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from organizations 

collaborating in the project (if applicable) 

_____ Chart for timeline, research calendar, or milestones (required) 

_____ Human Subjects Protection Paperwork 

_____ Privacy Certificate 

_____ List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which you have 

submitted this proposal (if applicable) 

_____ Budget Narrative 

_____ Budget Detail Worksheet 

_____ Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 

_____ Plan for Collecting Data for Performance Measures 

Program Narrative/Abstract Format: 

_____ Double-spaced 

_____ 12-point standard font 

_____ 1” standard margins 

_____ Narrative is 25 pages or less 

Other Requirements: 

_____ Standard Form 424 

_____ DUNS number 

_____ Other standard forms as applicable (see pages 13–14), including 

_____ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if applicable) 

_____ Accounting System and Financial Capability Questionnaire (if applicable)
 

18