alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Heiko William SUNKLER; Michelle Herron Sunkler, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, Town of Nags Head, North Carolina; Bryan R. Seawell, Individually and as a Nags Head Building Inspector; Courtney N. Gallop, Individually and as a Nags Head Zoning Administrator; Gary R. Ferguson, Individually and as Planning Director for the Town of Nags Head, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1629.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 28, 2002.

Decided Nov. 7, 2002.

Michael B. Brough, The Brough Law Firm, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellants. L.P. Hornthal, Jr., Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Heiko William Sunkler and Michelle Herron Sunkler appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Sunkler v. Town of Nags Head,*No. CA-01-22 H (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Robinson-Humphrey Company, LLC
Address:   3333 Peachtree Road, N.E.
           Atlanta, Georgia 30326

Form 13F File Number:              28-4442

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      David C. Prince
Title:     General Counsel
Phone:     (404) 264-4210

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ David C. Prince        Atlanta, Georgia          August 16, 1999
-------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006                            /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, JEFFREY D. SERKES, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                     |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/    Jeffrey D. Serkes                     
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | Jeffrey D. Serkes Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6555 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6555

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
 to designate breast pumps and certain lactation supplies as eligible 
       for certain financial assistance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2022

  Ms. Underwood (for herself and Mr. Katko) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
 to designate breast pumps and certain lactation supplies as eligible 
       for certain financial assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Delivering Essentials to Mothers 
Amid Natural Disasters Act of 2022'' or the ``DEMAND Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. BREASTFEEDING SUPPLIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, in consultation with the Co-chairs of the Federal 
Interagency Breastfeeding Workgroup, shall include breast pumps, other 
lactation supplies appropriate for use in emergency settings, other 
equipment necessary to support the safe use of such breast pumps, and 
services by lactation support providers as eligible for financial 
assistance under section 408(e) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5174(e)).
    (b) Lactation Support Providers Defined.--In this section, the term 
``lactation support providers'' includes breastfeeding and lactation 
educators or counselors, including a lactation consultant, 
breastfeeding counselor, breastfeeding peer counselor, or lactation 
educator, without regard to the type of license or certification such 
individual holds.
                                 <all>
```
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Eric R. Graef

Eric R. GraefChief Financial Officer and Vice President  Finance(Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Locke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 6, 2010



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/S/    CHRISTOPHER J.
LOCKE                      
|Christopher J. Locke                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



27
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT



(401(K) PLAN)





AGREEMENT, made this October 1, 1997, by and between James M. Paul (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"), and Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation with its principal offices at 5 Hub Drive, Melville, New York 11747.



WHEREAS, the Trustee has agreed to provide his service to the Chyron Corp. 401(K) Plan, (the "Plan") provided that Chyron Corporation (the "Company") agrees to indemnify and hold it harmless for certain actions or inactions as Trustee; and



WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee for certain actions or inactions as Trustee.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



1.	To the maximum extent permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and by other applicable Federal or state law, the Trustee shall not be liable for (either jointly or severally), and the Company shall indemnify the Trustee against, and agree to hold the Trustee harmless from, any and all liabilities and claims (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against such liabilities and claims) against the Trustee arising from any action or inaction of the Trustee with respect to the Plan, unless such liability or expense results from grossly negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by the Trustee.  The foregoing indemnification also shall apply to all liabilities and claims against the Trustee arising from any breach of fiduciary responsibility by fiduciaries other than Trustee, unless the Trustee participates knowingly in such breach, or has actual knowledge of such breach and fails to take reasonable remedial action to remedy such breach.  The Trustee shall be entitled to collect on the Company's indemnity under this Agreement only from the Company and shall not be entitled to payment directly or indirectly from the Plan.



2.	The Trustee shall give the Company prompt written notice of any asserted or potential claim by any party with respect to which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.  The Company shall have the right to defend and control the nature of any action or defense to any such claim or demand which may be asserted against the Trustee for which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and executed this Agreement, effective October 1, 1997.



| |     | CHYRON CORPORATION          
| | --- | ----------------------------
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| | By: | /s/ Robert S. Matlin        
| |     | Name: Robert S. Matlin, Esq.
| |     | Title:   Secretary          
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| |     | /s/ James M. Paul           
| |     | Name: James M. Paul         
| |     |
Agreement, dated February 14, 2005



 Exhibit 10.58 
  
 [CONSOL Energy Letterhead] 
  
 February 11, 2005 
  
 Jerry Richey, Esq. 
 439 Austin Avenue 
 Mt. Lebanon, PA 15243 
  
 Dear Jerry: 
  
 I am pleased to extend an offer to you for the position of Vice President and General
Counsel with CONSOL Energy Inc. The terms of the offer are as follows: 
  

					
	1.	  	Position	  	Vice President and General Counsel
			
	2.	  	Base Salary	  	$280,000 Annually
			
	3.	  	Annual Incentive Compensation Opportunity	  	50% of Base Annual Salary The current formula to determine Annual incentive Compensation award is; Base Annual Salary (X) Annual Incentive Compensation (X) Company Performance (range is 0% to
150%) (X) Individual Performance (range is 0% to 130%)
			
	4.	  	Vehicle Allowance	  	$1,050 Per Month
			
	5.	  	Long Term Incentive Compensation (“LTIC”)	  	Participation in CONSOL Energy’s LTIC with an initial grant of $300,000 in the form of Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units
			
	6.	  	Vacation	  	Five weeks per year
			
	7.	  	Term of Employment	  	Two years guaranteed employment through March 1, 2007, subject to termination only for gross Misconduct.
			
	8.	  	Severance Pay	  	In addition to all salary, compensation and benefits due for remaining term, one year’s severance pay, including continued vesting of LTIC and Incentive Pay as defined in existing standard
form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for any involuntary termination other than gross misconduct occurring during or after expiration of Term. In order to receive the severance payment, must sign a general release of all claims in a form
acceptable to CONSOL Energy.









					
	9.	  	Salary Continuance	  	Will participate at the highest amount of salary continuance plan benefits, currently 13 weeks at full base salary, and 39 weeks at 75% base salary
			
	10	  	Change of Control	  	Will receive standard Change of Control Severance Agreement. If entitled to receive Compensation and Benefits Upon Involuntary Termination Associated with a Change of Control, then terms of
Change in Control Severance Agreement supercede the terms of this letter agreement regarding severance pay.

  
 Please accept this offer by signing
both copies of this letter, and returning one signed copy to my attention. The other copy is for your records. 
  
 I look forward to you joining our management team and welcome your contributions to CONSOL Energy’s success. 
  

	
	Sincerely
	
	 /s/ J. Brett Harvey


	President and Chef Executive Officer


  
 Agreed to as of this
14th day of February 2005 
  

	
	 /s/ Jerry Richey


	Jerry Richey
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Gaskin, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s argument that he was deprived of a fair trial by the court’s denial of his motion for a severance. Defendant was charged with two armed robberies which occurred approximately six or seven hours apart at separate locations. The offenses are "the same or similar in law” and thus were properly joinable (CPL 200.20 [2] [c]; *see, People v Jenkins,*50 NY2d 981). Defendant’s motion for severance was addressed to the court’s discretion *(see,*CPL 200.20 [3]; *People v Lane,*56 NY2d 1; *People v Mercer,*151 AD2d 1004, *lv denied*74 NY2d 815) and there is nothing in the record to suggest that such discretion was not properly exercised.

We also find that the accomplice testimony of Otis Harris was sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of three individ*817uals who were working at McDonald’s restaurant at the time of the robbery. All three witnesses identified defendant as one of the perpetrators *(see,*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Moses,*63 NY2d 299, 306; *People v Glasper,*52 NY2d 970, 971; *People v Daniels,*37 NY2d 624, 630).

Defendant’s arguments concerning purported errors in the court’s charge are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Pelc,*101 AD2d 995), and we decline to address them in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

We have reviewed the other issues raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
321, 324 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err 

in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Elliott Sattler, District Judge 

Jerod Lee Updike 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joe Roberts, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered July 13, 1988, which convicted defendant, on his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and sentenced him, as a predicate felony offender, to a term of imprisonment of from *2Vz*to 5 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s only point on appeal is that his plea of guilty should not have been accepted by the trial court without it first having decided his *pro se*motion to dismiss the indictment because of his attorney’s failure to notify the District Attorney of his intent to appear before the Grand Jury and the District Attorney’s failure to notify him of the Grand Jury proceeding. We disagree. A defendant who pleads guilty waives any nonjurisdictional claims that he might have asserted based upon events or circumstances prior to the plea *(People v Fernandez,*67 NY2d 686). Indeed, such a waiver has been held effective specifically as against the right to testify before the Grand Jury *(People v Roberson,*149 AD2d 926; *69
      *People v Grey,*135 AD2d 1031; *People v Ferrara,*99 AD2d 257). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.