Notices regarding the solicitation “Tribal-Researcher Capacity 

Building Grants Solicitation, Fiscal Year 2020”

April 17, 2020: The critical application elements on page 25 have been revised to include “a 

tribal resolution or letter of commitment, if applicable,” as referenced on page 13. 

March 27, 2020: Many of our solicitations encourage research partnerships and require 

applicants to include a strong letter of support, signed by an appropriate decision-making 

authority from each proposed partnering entity.

NIJ continues to strongly encourage prospective applicants to submit executed agreements 

necessary to carrying out the work proposed with applications if they can be obtained, but with 

an understanding of the circumstances surrounding the pandemic, NIJ will accept applications 

without them.

Applicants selected for award will be required to submit completed agreements by January 1, 

2021. Funds will be withheld until such agreements have been received.

The original solicitation document begins on the next page.
U.S. Department of Justice OMB No. 1121-0329 

Office of Justice Programs Approval Expires 11/30/2020 

National Institute of Justice 

Tribal-Researcher Capacity Building Grants Solicitation, Fiscal 

Year 2020

FY 2020 Competitive Research Grant Solicitation 

CFDA No. 16.560

Grants.gov Solicitation Number: NIJ-2020-17329

Solicitation Release Date: February 4, 2020 

Application Deadline: 3:59 p.m. eastern time on May 4, 2020

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) is seeking applications for funding for grants to support research involving federally 

recognized tribes (or tribally based organizations) on issues of crime and justice in the United 

States. This program furthers the Department’s mission by sponsoring research to provide 

objective, independent, evidence-based knowledge and tools that will combat violent crime, 

promote safe communities, and uphold the rights of victims of crime, particularly at the tribal 

level. 

This solicitation incorporates the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by reference. The OJP 

Grant Application Resource Guide provides guidance to applicants on how to prepare and 

submit applications for funding. If this solicitation expressly modifies any provision in the OJP 

Grant Application Resource Guide, the applicant is to follow the guidelines in this solicitation as 

to that provision. 

Eligibility (Who may apply) 

In general, NIJ is authorized to make grants to, or enter into contracts or cooperative 

agreements with eligible entities as listed below: 

 States (including territories); 

 Units of local government; 

 Federally recognized Indian tribal governments that perform law enforcement functions 

(as determined by the Secretary of the Interior); 

 Nonprofit and for-profit organizations (including tribal nonprofit and for-profit 

organizations); and 
2

NIJ-2020-17329

 Institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions of higher education).

Foreign governments, foreign organizations, and foreign colleges and universities are not 

eligible to apply. Federal agencies are eligible to apply. (Any award made to a federal agency 

will be made as an inter-agency reimbursable agreement.)

All recipients and subrecipients (including any for-profit organization) must forgo any profit or 

management fee.

NIJ will consider applications under which two-or-more entities would carry out the federal 

award; however, only one entity may be the applicant. Any others must be proposed as 

subrecipients (subgrantees). The applicant must be the entity that would have primary 

responsibility for carrying out the award, including administering the funding and managing the 

entire project. For additional information on subawards, see the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide.

Contact Information

For technical assistance with submitting an application, contact the Grants.gov Customer Support 

Hotline at 1-800-518-4726 or 1-606-545-5035 (international), at 

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/support.html, or at support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov

Support Hotline operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except on federal holidays.

An applicant that experiences unforeseen Grants.gov technical issues beyond its control that 

prevent it from submitting its application by the deadline must email the NIJ contact identified 

below within 24 hours after the application deadline to request approval to submit its 

application after the deadline. Additional information on reporting technical issues appears 

under “Experiencing Unforeseen Grants.gov Technical Issues” in the “How To Apply

(Grants.gov)” section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide.

For assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, contact the National Criminal 

Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Response Center: toll-free at 1-800-851-3420; via TTY at 

301-240-6310 (hearing impaired only); email grants@ncjrs.gov; fax to 301-240-5830; or web 

chat at https://webcontact.ncjrs.gov/ncjchat/chat.jsp. The NCJRS Response Center hours of 

operation are 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 

8:00 p.m. eastern time on the solicitation close date. General information on applying for NIJ 

awards can be found at https://nij.ojp.gov/funding. Answers to frequently asked questions that 

may assist applicants are posted at https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/frequently-asked-questions-aboutapplying-grants-and-cooperative-agreements.

Deadline Details

Applicants must register with Grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html

prior to submitting an application. All applications are due by 3:59 p.m. eastern time on May 4, 

2020.

To be considered timely, an application must be submitted by the application deadline using 

Grants.gov, and the applicant must have received a validation message from Grants.gov that 

indicates successful and timely submission. OJP urges applicants to submit applications at least 
3

NIJ-2020-17329

72 hours prior to the application due date, to allow time for the applicant to receive validation 

messages or rejection notifications from Grants.gov, and to correct in a timely fashion any 

problems that may have caused a rejection notification.

An applicant must use the Add Attachment button to attach a file to its application. Do not click 

the paperclip icon to attach files. This action will not attach the files to the application. After 

adding an attachment, select the View Attachment button to confirm you attached the correct 

file. To remove the file, select the Delete Attachment button.

OJP encourages all applicants to read this Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov.

For additional information, see the “How to Apply (Grants.gov)” section in the OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide.
4

NIJ-2020-17329

Contents

A. Program Description 5

Overview 5

Project-Specific Information 5

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products 7

B. Federal Award Information 10

Type of Award 11

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls 11

Budget Information 11

Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement 12

Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs) 12

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver 12

Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs 12

Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) 12

C. Eligibility Information 12

D. Application and Submission Information 12

What an Application Should Include 12

How To Apply (Grants.gov) 18

E. Application Review Information 19

Review Criteria 19

Review Process 21

F. Federal Award Administration Information 22

Federal Award Notices 22

Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements 22

Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses 22

General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements 23

G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) 23

H. Other Information 23

Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a) 23

Provide Feedback to OJP 23

Application Checklist 24
5

NIJ-2020-17329

Tribal-Researcher Capacity Building Grants 

Solicitation, Fiscal Year 2020

CFDA No. 16.560

A. Program Description

Overview

NIJ actively supports research that involves federally recognized tribes (or tribally based 

organizations) on issues of crime and justice in the United States. In doing so, NIJ is committed 

to ethical and engaged efforts in line with responsible research conduct and federal trust 

responsibilities. This solicitation seeks applications for funding for planning grants to develop 

new and innovative criminal and juvenile justice research or evaluation projects that address the 

challenges of fighting crime and strengthening justice in Indian country and Alaska Native 

villages. To ensure proposed projects result in tangible and mutually beneficial studies, they 

must include a new tribal-researcher partnership component. This solicitation supports DOJ 

Strategic Objective 3.1: Combat violent crime, promote safe communities, and uphold the 

rights of victims of crime.

Statutory Authority: Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 

(sections 201 and 202); the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (sections 231-233); and 28 U.S.C. 

530C.

Project-Specific Information

Through this solicitation, NIJ will provide small planning grants to fund applications to 

develop new and innovative criminal and juvenile justice research projects involving 

federally recognized tribes (or tribally based organizations) and that represent a new 

tribal-researcher investigator partnership.1 For the purposes of this solicitation, a new 

partnership is defined as a newly developed partnership where a partnership did not 

previously exist. Applications that do not involve a new tribal-researcher investigative 

partnership will not be considered (i.e., a pre-existing partnership or project continuation

does not fit the criteria of this solicitation).

Under this solicitation, grant funding may be awarded to cover costs associated with:

 Engaging and conferring with tribal nations on criminal and juvenile justice research, 

development, testing (e.g., technology), and evaluation aimed to improve public safety in 

tribal communities;

 Establishing new tribal nation and tribal program partnerships and participation (e.g., 

technical and factual presentations to tribal leadership or governing bodies, including 

those requested by a tribe in connection with its process for providing its authorization 

[through tribal resolution or other appropriate documentation] to participate in the funded 

project; obtaining participatory agreements; and securing tribal Institutional Review 

 

1 Under such an arrangement, the applicant research entity (or applicant researcher) may make subawards to tribal 

(or tribal organization) partners that would participate in the funded project.
6

NIJ-2020-17329

Board [IRB] approvals);

 Developing research questions and study designs using community-based participatory 

research principles that involve the tribal partner in all aspects of the research process;

 Conducting pilot, feasibility, or evaluability assessment studies that may involve 

collecting preliminary data and/or secondary data analysis, and

 Drafting a tribal-researcher investigator criminal or juvenile justice proposal for 

submission, based on the new partnership.

While the scope of this solicitation is defined as investigator-initiated, the following research 

topics are of particular interest to the U.S. Department of Justice:

 The impact of concurrent criminal jurisdiction on the administration of justice in Indian 

country and Alaska Native villages.

 The effectiveness of the criminal justice response to combating the opioid crisis, and 

more broadly, the use and abuse of alcohol and other drugs (e.g., methamphetamine, 

heroin, and other opioids including fentanyl, diverted pharmaceuticals, synthetic drugs, 

and analogues).

 Combating violent crime and responding to and reducing victimization.

• Enhancing investigations and prosecutions.

 Provision, role, and impact of forensic science services (including medicolegal death 

investigation), particularly as it relates to combating the opioid crisis and violent crime.

 Strengthening tribal justice systems (e.g., evaluating tribal healing to wellness courts, 

tribal-state collaborations, wellness court collaborations, technology-based court 

systems that improve court operations and outcomes, tribal-reentry programs).

 Developing and testing tools and technologies to improve criminal justice policy and 

practice (e.g., unmanned aircraft systems, body-worn cameras, drug-detecting 

technology, location-based technology, digital devices or applications, victim technologybased services).

Applications proposing research involving partnerships with criminal justice or other agencies 

must include a strong letter of support, signed by an appropriate decision-making authority from 

each proposed partnering agency. A letter of support must include the partnering agency’s 

acknowledgement that de-identified data provided through this project will be archived by the 

awardee in the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD) at the conclusion of the 

award (please see “Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products,” below). 

If selected for an award, applicants will be expected to have a formal agreement in place with 

partnering agencies by January 1, 2021. That agreement must include provisions to meet the 

data archiving requirements of the award.

In rare circumstances — for example, where law prohibits the archiving of agency data —

NIJ may agree to a successful applicant creating and archiving an appropriate synthetic dataset. 
7

NIJ-2020-17329

Those circumstances will be rare, decided by NIJ on a case-by-case basis, and will require 

extensive documentation and justification for exceptions to be made.

The period of performance is limited to 18 months and is not renewable.

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products

The goal of this solicitation is to build an increased capability to conduct rigorous research and 

evaluation projects in Indian country and Alaska Native villages through the promotion of 

engagement between researchers and tribal nations. The objective of this solicitation is to fund 

multiple planning grants for projects promoting such arrangements that address criminal justice 

issues in Indian country and Alaska Native villages.

Final Research Report. Any recipient of an award under this solicitation will be expected to 

submit a proposal for a criminal or juvenile justice research or evaluation project based on the 

results of the activities funded under the planning grant. Such a proposal will comport with the 

instructions provided in Section D Application and Submission Information of this solicitation. 

NIJ will consider such proposals for potential award based on the criteria provided in Section E

Application Review Information of this solicitation. Additional information on the final research 

report requirement can be found on the Research, Development, and Evaluation Grant Award 

Requirements page on the NIJ website. The Final Research Report will undergo review for 

public archive on the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS).

Special Report. The awardee will be expected to submit a special report detailing the 

tribal-research partnership. The report should thoroughly capture the process and 

substance of the collaboration, including lessons learned, challenges and successes 

experienced, and overall reflections. The special report should also map out key issues 

that can help inform existing or future partnerships of a similar nature.

Required Data Sets and Associated Files and Documentation. Any recipient of an award 

under this solicitation will be expected to submit to the National Archive of Criminal Justice 

Data (NACJD) all data sets that result in whole or in part from the work funded by the 

award, along with associated files and any documentation necessary for future efforts by 

others to reproduce the project’s findings and/or to extend the scientific value of the data set 

through secondary analysis. For more information, see Program Narrative in Section D. 

Application and Submission Information.

For tribal nations with specific data access and ownership policies that prohibit or limit data 

archiving, NIJ expects the recipient of an award made under this solicitation to work with 

any participating or impacted tribe to ensure that an appropriate data sharing agreement is 

developed and implemented with the tribe that provides — among other things — a

designated tribal entity (tribal council, tribal IRB, or analogous body) to review and approve 

data access requests (as applicable to the project).

Technology Prototype: An exemplar of any algorithm, method, software development kit, and 

training data set resulting from research and development activities funded under this 

solicitation will be delivered to NIJ at the end of the award for third-party evaluation, along with 

detailed implementation instructions. Documentation must include descriptions of algorithmic 

development and approaches to data collection.
8

NIJ-2020-17329

In addition to these deliverables (and the required reports and data on performance 

measures described in Section F. Federal Award Administration Information), NIJ expects 

scholarly products to result from each award under this solicitation, taking the form of one or 

more published, peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles, and/or (if appropriate) law review 

journal articles, book chapter(s) or book(s) in the academic press, technological prototypes, 

patented inventions, or similar scientific products.

NIJ also expects copies of products developed specifically for the tribal partner and/or tribal 

stakeholders (e.g., interim or final reports, presentations, newsletters/articles) to be 

produced.

NIJ expects that there will be an equal effort to make the research findings accessible to 

practitioner and policymaker audiences through articles in trade publications, the development 

of training manuals, policy briefs, conferences, webinars, and articles for newspapers or 

magazines.

The Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products are directly related to the 

performance measures that demonstrate the results of the work completed.

Performance Measures

OJP will require each successful applicant to submit regular performance data that demonstrate 

the results of the work carried out under the award (see “General Information about PostFederal Award Reporting Requirements” in Section F. Federal Award Administration 

Information).

Applicants should visit OJP’s performance measurement page at www.ojp.gov/performance for 

an overview of performance measurement activities at OJP.

The application should demonstrate the applicant’s understanding of the performance data 

reporting requirements for this grant program and detail how the applicant will gather the 

required data should it receive funding.

Please note that applicants are not required to submit performance data with the application. 

Performance measures information is included as an alert that successful applicants will be 

required to submit performance data as part of the reporting requirements under an award.
9

NIJ-2020-17329

Objective Performance Measure(s) Data Recipient Provides

Conduct research in 

science, technology, 

engineering, and/or 

mathematics having 

clear implications for 

criminal or juvenile 

justice policy and 

practice in the United 

States.

Conduct research in 

social and behavioral 

sciences having clear 

implications for criminal 

justice policy and 

practice in the United 

States.

1. Relevance to the needs of the field as 

measured by whether the project’s 

substantive scope did not deviate 

from the funded project or any 

subsequent agency-approved 

modifications to the scope.

2. Quality of the research as 

demonstrated by the scholarly 

products that result in whole or in part 

from work funded under the NIJ 

award, such as published, peerreviewed, scientific journal articles, 

and/or (as appropriate for the funded 

project) law review journal articles, 

book chapter(s) or book(s) in the 

academic press, technological 

prototypes, patented inventions, or 

similar scientific products.

3. Quality of management as measured 

by such factors as whether significant 

project milestones were achieved, 

reporting and other deadlines were 

met, and costs remained within 

approved limits.

4. Number of technologies fielded as a 

result (in whole or in part) of work 

funded under the NIJ award.

1. Quarterly financial reports, 

semi-annual and final 

research performance 

progress reports, and products 

of the work performed under 

the NIJ award (including, at 

minimum, a final criminal or 

juvenile justice research 

proposal and special report on 

the partnership).

If applicable, an annual audit 

report.

2. List of citation(s) to all 

scholarly products that 

resulted in whole or in part 

from work funded under the 

NIJ award.

3. If applicable, each data set 

that resulted in whole or in 

part from work funded under 

the NIJ award.

4. Description of all technologies 

fielded as a result (in whole or 

in part) of work funded under 

the NIJ award.

Evaluation Research

If an application includes an evaluation research component (or consists entirely of evaluation 

research), the application is expected to propose the most rigorous evaluation design 

appropriate for the research questions to be addressed. If the primary purpose of the evaluation 

is to determine the effectiveness or impact of an intervention (e.g., program, practice, or policy), 

the most rigorous evaluation designs may include random selection and assignment of 

participants (or other appropriate units of analysis) to experimental and control conditions. In 

cases where randomization is not feasible, applicants should propose a strong quasiexperimental design that can address the risk of selection bias.

Applications that include evaluation research should consider the feasibility of including 

cost/benefit analysis. In cases where evaluations find that interventions have produced the 

intended benefit, cost/benefit analysis provides valuable and practical information for 

practitioners and policymakers that aids decision making.

Evaluation research projects may also address a wide range of research questions beyond 

those focused on the effectiveness or impact of an intervention. Different research designs may 

be more appropriate for different research questions and at different stages of program 
10

NIJ-2020-17329

development. The intervention strategies, setting, other contextual factors, and resources 

should be taken into account when selecting an evaluation design. In all cases, applications are 

expected to propose the most rigorous evaluation design appropriate for the research questions 

to be addressed.

Applicants are encouraged to review evidence rating criteria at

https://www.crimesolutions.gov/about_starttofinish.aspx for further information on high-quality 

evaluation design elements.

B. Federal Award Information

Maximum number of awards NIJ expects to make: To be determined by the 

merit of applications

submitted to this solicitation 

and advanced to peer 

review, and available 

funding.

Estimated maximum dollar amount for each award: To be determined by the 

funding requested in

awarded applications, and 

available funding.

Total amount anticipated to be awarded under solicitation: $500,000

Period of performance start date: January 1, 2021

Period of performance duration: To be determined by the 

period of performance of 

awarded applications. 

Successful applicants will be 

expected to complete the 

work proposed within an 18-

month period of 

performance.

To allow time for (among other things) any necessary post-award review and financial clearance 

by OJP of the proposed budget and for any associated responses or other action(s) that may be 

required of the recipient, applicants should propose an award start date of January 1, 2021.

If the applicant is proposing a project that reasonably could be conducted in discrete phases, 

with each phase resulting in completion of one or more significant, defined milestones, then NIJ 

strongly recommends that the applicant structure the application — specifically including the 

narrative, expected scholarly products, timelines/milestones, and budget detail worksheet and 

budget narrative — to clearly define each phase. (This is particularly the case if the applicant 

proposes a project that will exceed — in cost or the length of the period of performance — the 

amount or length of time anticipated for an individual award (or awards) under this solicitation.) 

Given limitations on the availability to NIJ of funds for awards for research, development, and 

evaluation, this information will assist NIJ in considering whether partial funding of applications 

would be productive. (If, in FY 2020, NIJ elects to fund only certain phases of a proposed 
11

NIJ-2020-17329

project, the expected scholarly products from the partial-funding award may, in some cases, 

vary from those described above.)

NIJ may, in certain cases, provide additional funding in future years to awards made under this 

solicitation, through continuation awards. OJP will consider, among other factors, OJP’s 

strategic priorities, a recipient’s overall management of the award, and progress of award 

funded work, when making continuation award decisions. 

Under this solicitation, any particular applicant entity may submit more than one application, as 

long as each application proposes a different project in response to the solicitation. Also, an 

entity may be proposed as a subrecipient (“subgrantee”) in more than one application.

NIJ may elect to fund applications submitted under this FY 2020 solicitation in future fiscal 

years, dependent on, among other considerations, the merit of the applications and on the 

availability of appropriations.

All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or 

additional requirements that may be imposed by law.

Type of Award

NIJ expects to make awards under this solicitation as grants. See the “Administrative, National 

Policy, and Other Legal Requirements” section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide

for additional information. Any funds provided to another federal agency will be made as an 

inter-agency reimbursable agreement.

Please note: Any recipient of an award under this solicitation will be required to comply with 

DOJ regulations on confidentiality and protection of human subjects. See “Requirements related 

to Research” under “Overview of Legal Requirements Generally Applicable to OJP Grants and 

Cooperative Agreements – FY 2020 Awards” in the OJP Funding Resource Center.

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls

Award recipients and subrecipients (including recipients or subrecipients that are pass-through 

entities) must, as described in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements2 as set out at 2 C.F.R. 

200.303, comply with standards for financial and program management. See OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide for additional information.

Budget Information

What will not be funded:

 Applications primarily to purchase equipment, materials, or supplies. (A budget may 

include these items if they are necessary to conduct research, development, 

demonstration, evaluation, or analysis.)

 Applications that are not responsive to this specific solicitation.

 

2 The "Part 200 Uniform Requirements” means the DOJ regulation at 2 C.F.R Part 2800, which adopts (with certain 

modifications) the provisions of 2 C.F.R. Part 200.
12

NIJ-2020-17329

 Programs or services unrelated to the scope of the project, or existing programs or 

services being evaluated.

 Training in support of programs or direct services unrelated to or associated with the 

proposed project.

 Applications involving tribal governments and/or being conducted on tribal lands that do 

not have an executed tribal resolution or executive order from the tribal authorized 

representative (i.e., tribal council) sanctioning the partnership/project.

 Applications involving tribally based organizations that do not have a letter of 

commitment from the tribal organization’s authorized representative (i.e., tribal 

administrator/executive director) authorizing the partnership/project.

 Applications that do not involve a new tribal-researcher investigative partnership (i.e., a 

pre-existing partnership or project continuation).

Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement

See “Cofunding” paragraph under item 4 (“Budget Information and Associated Documentation”) 

under “What an Application Should Include” in Section D. Application and Submission 

Information.

Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following:

 Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs)

 Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver

 Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs

 Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable)

C. Eligibility Information

For eligibility information, see title page.

For information on cost sharing or match requirements, see “What an Application Should 

Include” in Section D. Application and Submission Information.

D. Application and Submission Information

This solicitation expressly modifies the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not 

incorporating the “Disclosure of Process Related to Executive Compensation” provisions in the 

“Application Attachments” section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide.

What an Application Should Include

The following application elements MUST be included in the application submission for an 

application to meet the basic minimum requirements (BMR) to advance to peer review and 
13

NIJ-2020-17329

receive consideration for funding: Program Narrative, Budget Detail Worksheet (including 

Budget Narrative), resumes/curriculum vitae of key personnel, and a tribal resolution or letter of 

commitment, if applicable. (For purposes of this solicitation, “key personnel” means the principal 

investigator, and any and all co-principal investigators.)

See the “Application Elements and Formatting Instructions” section of the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide for information on what happens to an application that does not contain all the 

specified elements, or that is nonresponsive to the scope of the solicitation.

1. Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form (SF)-424)

The SF-424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for submission of preapplications, applications, and related information. See the OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide for additional information on completing the SF-424.

Intergovernmental Review: This solicitation ("funding opportunity") is not subject to 

Executive Order 12372. (In completing the SF-424, an applicant is to answer question 19 by 

selecting the response that the “Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.”)

2. Project Abstract

The project abstract is a very important part of the application, and serves as an introduction 

to the proposed project. NIJ uses the project abstract for a number of purposes, including 

assignment of the application to an appropriate review panel. If the application is funded, the 

project abstract typically will become public information and be used to describe the project;

therefore, any confidential study information (e.g., site name/location) should not be 

included in the abstract.

Applications should include a high quality project abstract that summarizes the proposed 

project in no more than 400 words. Project abstracts should be:

 Written for a general public audience.

 Submitted as a separate attachment with “Project Abstract” as part of its file name.

 Single-spaced, using a standard 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch 

margins.

As a separate attachment, the project abstract will not count against the page limit for the 

program narrative.

Project abstracts should follow the detailed template (including the detailed instructions as to 

content) available on the NIJ webpage.

3. Program Narrative

The program narrative section of the application should not exceed 30 double-spaced pages 

in 12-point font with 1-inch margins. If included in the main body of the program narrative, 

tables, charts, figures, and other illustrations count toward the 30-page limit for the narrative 

section. The project abstract, table of contents, appendices, and government forms do not 

count toward the 30-page limit.
14

NIJ-2020-17329

If the program narrative fails to comply with these length-related restrictions, NIJ may 

negatively consider such noncompliance in peer review and in final award decisions.

The following sections should be included as part of the program narrative.

3

Program Narrative Guidelines:

a. Title Page (not counted against the 30-page program narrative limit)

The title page should include the title of the project, submission date, funding opportunity 

number, and the name and complete contact information (that is, address, telephone 

number, and e-mail address) for both the applicant and the principal investigator.

b. Resubmit Response (if applicable) (not counted against the 30-page program narrative 

limit)

If an applicant is resubmitting an application presented previously to NIJ, but not funded, 

the applicant should indicate this. A statement should be provided, no more than two 

pages, addressing: (1) the title, submission date, and NIJ-assigned application number 

of the previous application, and (2) a brief summary of revisions to the application, 

including responses to previous feedback received from NIJ.

c. Table of Contents and Figures (not counted against the 30-page program narrative 

limit)

d. Main Body

The main body of the Program Narrative should describe the proposed new partnership 

and project. The Program Narrative should include all of the following headings: 

Background, Work Plan, Approach, and Organizational Capacity of Applicant. The 

program narrative should be succinct, self-explanatory, and in the order outlined in this 

section. It should address outcomes and activities to be conducted over the entire period 

of performance.

Background. Applicants should provide a detailed description of the new tribalresearcher investigator partnership, how the tribal partner/stakeholder input was sought, 

and how it was incorporated into the proposal. In addition, the applicant should describe 

possible criminal and juvenile justice projects the tribal partner has identified as priority 

matters. Applicants should include any relevant data, background, and any other 

information to show the significance and importance of the issue or issues under 

consideration, using data that are pertinent to understanding the identified problem (e.g., 

statistics, research findings, other objective evidence, as appropriate). If the partnership 

has already resulted in identifying a priority matter, this section should identify the 

 

3 As noted earlier, if the proposed program or project reasonably could be conducted in discrete phases, with each 

phase resulting in completion of one or more significant, defined milestones, then NIJ strongly recommends that the 

applicant structure the application — specifically including the narrative, expected scholarly products, 

timelines/milestones, and budget detail worksheet and budget narrative — to set out each phase clearly. (In 

appropriate cases, the expected scholarly product(s) from a particular phase may vary from those described above.) 

See generally “Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products” under “Program-Specific 

Information,” above.
15

NIJ-2020-17329

research questions and discuss the purpose, goals, and objectives of the proposed 

project. Finally, the applicant should describe how tribal interests and priorities will drive 

research planning, design, and implementation.

Work Plan. Applicants should provide a proposed work plan detailing each task and 

activity to be carried out during the period of performance. Applicants should address all 

the steps in partnership development and research planning. Also, applicants must 

provide a timeline with clearly defined milestones. The work plan should include a 

discussion of anticipated deliverables, including planned scholarly products indicated in 

the project-specific information on page 7, and a plan for dissemination to appropriate 

tribal stakeholders. Applicants should identify plans to produce or disseminate to broader 

interested practitioners and policymakers in a form that is designed to be readily 

accessible and useful to them.

Approach. Applicants should provide a detailed description of the strategies to fulfill the 

new tribal-researcher partnership and in developing and submitting a criminal or juvenile 

justice research or evaluation project. Applicants should explain what strategies will be 

applied for capacity building, project planning, communication, and dissemination. In 

addition, applicants should describe the potential impact of both the tribal-researcher 

partnership and research development project, and how it may inform or improve 

criminal or juvenile justice-related policy, practice, or theory in the United States. Finally, 

applicants should consider the feasibility of the proposed project and potential 

challenges or problems in carrying out activities. Where appropriate, the applicant 

should describe capacity, plans, and willingness to share successful approaches widely 

through various venues for broad diffusion of innovation.

Organizational Capacity of Applicant. This section should describe the experience 

and capability of the applicant organization, key staff (researcher[s] and tribal partner[s]), 

and any proposed subgrantees (including consultants) that the applicant will use to 

implement and manage this effort and the federal funds under this award; highlighting 

any previous experience implementing projects of similar scope, design, and magnitude. 

Applicants should address:

 Experience (if any) and capacity working with federally recognized tribes (or 

tribally based organizations) and in conducting similar research efforts.

 Experience implementing community-engaged research and evaluation projects.

 Experience and capacity to design and implement rigorous research and data 

analysis projects.

 Experience producing and disseminating meaningful deliverables.

Applicants should also outline the management plan, structure, and organization 

proposed to complete proposed tasks/projects, and provide a description of the roles, 

responsibilities, and qualifications of the applicant’s proposed staff and partners. The 

management plan should connect to the goals and objectives of the project.
16

NIJ-2020-17329

e. Appendices do not count against the 30-page program narrative limit) include:

 Bibliography/references.

 Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps pertaining to 

the proposed project that are supplemental to such items included in the main body 

of the narrative.

 Curriculum vitae or resume of the principal investigator and any and all co-principal

investigators. In addition, curriculum vitae, resume, or biographical sketches of all 

other individuals (regardless of “investigator” status) who will be significantly involved 

in substantive aspects of the proposed project (including, for example, individuals 

such as statisticians used to conduct proposed data analysis).

 To assist OJP in assessing actual or apparent conflicts of interest (including such 

conflicts on the part of prospective reviewers of the application, a complete list of the 

individuals named or otherwise identified anywhere in the application (including in 

the budget or in any other attachment) who will or may work (or advise or consult) on 

the proposed research, development, or evaluation project. This applies to all such 

individuals, including, for example, individuals who are or would be employees of the 

applicant or employees of any proposed subrecipient entity, any individuals who 

themselves may be a subrecipient, and individuals who may (or will) work without 

compensation (such as advisory board members). This appendix to the program 

narrative is to include, for each listed individual: name, title, employer, any other 

potentially-pertinent organizational affiliation(s), and the individual's proposed roles 

and responsibilities in carrying out the proposed project. If the application identifies 

any specific entities or organizations (other than the applicant) that will or may work 

(or advise or consult) on the proposed project, without also naming any associated 

individuals, the name of each such organization also should be included on this list.

Applicants should use the “Proposed Project Staff, Affiliation, and Roles” form

available on the NIJ webpage to prepare this list.

If the application (including the budget) identifies any proposed non-competitive 

agreements that are or may be considered procurement "contracts" (rather than 

subawards) for purposes of federal grants administrative requirements the applicant 

also must list the entities with which the applicant proposes to contract. Applicants 

should provide this list as a separate sheet entitled "Proposed non-competitive 

procurement contracts."

For information on distinctions — for purposes of federal grants administrative 

requirements — between subawards and procurement contracts under awards, see 

“Budget Information and Associated Documentation,” below.

 Proposed project timeline and expected milestones.

 Human Subjects Protection paperwork (documentation and forms related to 

Institutional Review Board [IRB] review). See https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/humansubjects-and-privacy-protection. Note: Final IRB approval is not required at the time 

an application is submitted.
17

NIJ-2020-17329

 Privacy Certificate (for further guidance go to 

https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/confidentiality-and-privacy-protections and 

https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/model-privacy-certificate).

 List of any previous and current NIJ awards to the applicant and investigator(s), 

including the NIJ-assigned award numbers and a brief description of any scholarly 

products that resulted in whole or in part from work funded under the NIJ award(s). 

(See “Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Expected Scholarly Products” under 

“Program-Specific Information,” above, for definition of “scholarly products.”)

 List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which this application has 

been submitted (if applicable).

 Applicants proposing to use incentives or stipends payments as part of their research 

project design, must submit an incentive or stipend approval request, as a separate 

document, according to the requirements set forth at 

https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/participant-support-costs-and-incentives-social-scienceresearch.

 Data archiving plan. Applicants should anticipate that NIJ will require (through 

special award conditions) that data sets resulting in whole or in part from projects 

funded under this solicitation be submitted for archiving with the NACJD. See

https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/data-archiving-plans-nij-funding-applicants.

Applications should include as an appendix a brief plan — labeled “Data Archiving 

Plan” — to comply with data archiving requirements. The plan should provide brief 

details about proposed data management and archiving, including submission to NIJ 

(through NACJD) of all files and documentation necessary to allow for future 

efforts by others to reproduce the project’s findings and/or to extend the scientific 

value of the data set through secondary analysis. Pertinent files and documentation 

include, among other things, qualitative and quantitative data produced, 

instrumentation and data collection forms, codebook(s), any specialized 

programming code necessary to reproduce all constructed measures and the original 

data analysis, description of necessary de-identification procedures, and (when 

required) a copy of the privacy certificate and informed consent protocols.

The plan should be one or two pages in length and include the level of effort 

associated with meeting archiving requirements.

Note that recipients are strongly encouraged to submit required data sets at least 90 

days before the end of the period of performance.

 Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from organizations 

collaborating in the project, such as law enforcement and correctional agencies (if 

applicable).
18

NIJ-2020-17329

Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following:

4. Budget Information and Associated Documentation in the Budget Preparation and 

Submission Information section.

The following paragraph (on “Cofunding”) expressly modifies the “Cost Sharing or Matching 

Requirement” provisions in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. The applicant is to 

follow the guidance in the following paragraph instead of the guidance stated under the 

“Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement” heading in the OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide.

Cofunding: An award made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 percent 

of the total cost of the project. The application should indicate whether it is feasible for the 

applicant to contribute cash, facilities, or services as non-federal support for the project. The 

application should identify generally any such contributions that the applicant expects to 

make and the proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, will be 

supported with non-federal contributions.

For additional match information, see the “Cost Sharing or Match Requirement” section 

under Section B. Federal Award Information.

If a successful application proposes a voluntary match amount, and OJP approves the 

budget, the total match amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes mandatory 

and subject to audit.

5. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement

6. Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) 

7. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (including 

applicant disclosure of high-risk status)

8. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

9. Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications

10. Applicant Disclosure and Justification – DOJ High-Risk Grantees4(if applicable)

11. Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity

How To Apply (Grants.gov)

Applicants must register in and submit applications through Grants.gov, a primary source to find 

federal funding opportunities and apply for funding. Find information on how to apply in 

response to this solicitation in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide.

 

4 A “DOJ High-Risk Grantee” is a recipient that has received a DOJ High-Risk designation based on a documented 

history of unsatisfactory performance, financial instability, management system or other internal control deficiencies, 

or noncompliance with award terms and conditions on prior awards, or that is otherwise not responsible.
19

NIJ-2020-17329

Registration and Submission Steps

Applicants will need the following identifying information when searching for the funding 

opportunity on Grants.gov.

 Assistance Listing 16.560, National Institute of Justice Research, Evaluation, and 

Development Project Grants.

 NIJ-2020-17329.

For information on each registration and submission step, see the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide.

E. Application Review Information

Review Criteria

Applications that meet basic minimum requirements will be evaluated by peer reviewers using 

the following review criteria. Each individual criterion is assigned a different weight based on the 

percentage value listed. For example, the first criterion, Background, is worth 25 percent of the 

score in the assessment of an application’s technical merit.

Background – 25%

1. Demonstrated an understanding of the complex justice system issues involving 

American Indian and Alaska Native communities. 

2. Demonstrated an understanding of the appropriate role of federal, tribal, state, and local 

agencies in addressing crime and victimization.

3. Demonstrated an understanding of the principles behind tribally driven research that 

results in tangible and mutually beneficial studies.

4. Demonstrated importance of research questions, goals and objectives, including 

alignment with the aims of the solicitation.

5. Demonstrated awareness of the state of current research.

Work Plan – 30%

1. Feasibility of proposed partnership, project, and timeline.

2. Soundness of methods and analytic and technical approach to addressing the stated 

aim(s) of the proposed project.

3. Awareness of potential pitfalls of proposed project design and feasibility of proposed 

actions to minimize and/or mitigate them.

4. Achievability of proposed deliverables and dissemination plan.
20

NIJ-2020-17329

Approach – 20%

 Feasibility of proposed approach toward the partnership, project, capacity building, 

communication, and dissemination.

 Potential for significantly improved understanding of the stated criminal/juvenile justice 

problem.

 Potential for innovative solution to address (all or a significant part of) the stated 

criminal/juvenile justice problem.

Organizational Capacity of Applicant (Capabilities, demonstrated productivity, and 

experience of the applicant organization and proposed project staff) – 25%

1. Qualifications and experience of proposed project staff; that is, the principal 

investigator, any and all co-principal investigators, and all other individuals (and 

organizations) identified in the application (regardless of “investigator” status) who will 

be significantly involved in substantive aspects of the proposed project.

2. Demonstrated ability of the applicant organization to implement the proposed strategies 

and manage the effort.

3. Relationship between the capabilities/competencies of the proposed project staff 

(including the applicant organization) and the scope and strategies of the proposed 

project.

Budget

In addition, peer reviewers will consider and may comment on the following additional items in 

the context of scientific and technical merit.

1. Total cost of the project relative to the perceived benefit (cost effectiveness).

2. Appropriateness of the budget relative to the level of effort.

3. Use of existing resources to conserve costs.

4. Alignment of the proposed budget with proposed project activities.

5. Proposed plan (if any) to produce or to make available to broader interested audiences, 

such as criminal/juvenile justice practitioners or policymakers, summary information 

from the planned scholarly products of the project.

Plan for Dissemination to Broader Audiences (if applicable to the proposed project)

Peer reviewers may comment—in the context of scientific and technical merit—on the proposed 

plan (if any) to produce or to make available to tribal stakeholders and/or broader interested 

audiences, such as criminal/juvenile justice practitioners or policymakers, summary information 

from the planned scholarly products of the project.
21

NIJ-2020-17329

Review Process

OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for making awards. NIJ reviews the 

application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, 

measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with the solicitation.

The following five paragraphs in this solicitation expressly modify the “Application Review 

Information” provisions in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. An applicant is to follow 

the guidance in these five paragraphs instead of the guidance stated under the “Application 

Review Information” heading in the Guide.

Peer reviewers will review the applications submitted under this solicitation that meet basic 

minimum requirements. For purposes of assessing whether an application meets basic 

minimum requirements and should proceed to further consideration, OJP screens applications 

for compliance with those requirements. Although specific requirements may vary, the following 

are common requirements applicable to all solicitations for funding under OJP programs:

 The application must be submitted by an eligible type of applicant.

 The application must request funding within programmatic funding constraints (if 

applicable).

 The application must be responsive to the scope of the solicitation.

 The application must include all items necessary to meet basic minimum requirements.

 The application, if submitted by an applicant that is a DOJ High-Risk Grantee,

5 or is 

designated “high-risk” by a federal grant-making agency outside of DOJ, must not have 

been determined by the Director to pose a substantial risk of program implementation 

failure, based on 1) the applicant’s lack of sufficient progress in addressing required 

corrective actions necessary for removal of the DOJ High-Risk Grantee (or non-DOJ 

high-risk) designation, 2) the nature and severity of the issues leading to or 

accompanying the DOJ High-Risk Grantee (or non-DOJ high-risk) designation, and/or 3) 

the applicant’s expected ability to manage grant funds and achieve grant goals and 

objectives.

For a list of application elements that MUST be included in the application submission in order 

for an application to meet the basic minimum requirements, see “What an Application Should 

Include” under Section D. Application and Submission Information.

Peer review panels will evaluate, score, and rate applications that meet basic minimum 

requirements. NIJ may use internal peer reviewers, external peer reviewers, or a combination, 

to assess applications on technical merit using the solicitation’s review criteria. An internal 

reviewer is a current DOJ employee who is well-versed or has expertise in the subject matter of 

this solicitation. An external peer reviewer is an expert in the subject matter of a given 

solicitation who is not a current DOJ employee. Peer reviewers’ ratings and any resulting 

recommendations are advisory only, but are considered carefully.

 

5 See “Applicant Disclosure and Justification – DOJ High-Risk Grantees” under “What an Application Should Include,” 

above, for a definition of “DOJ High-Risk Grantee.”
22

NIJ-2020-17329

Other important considerations for NIJ include geographic diversity, strategic priorities, available 

funding, the planned scholarly products, and the extent to which the Budget Detail Worksheet 

and Budget Narrative accurately explain project costs that are reasonable, necessary, and 

otherwise allowable under federal law and applicable federal cost principles.

Pursuant to the Part 200 Uniform Requirements, before award decisions are made, OJP also 

reviews information related to the degree of risk posed by the applicant. Among other things to 

help assess whether an applicant that has one or more prior federal awards has a satisfactory 

record with respect to performance, integrity, and business ethics, OJP checks whether the 

applicant is listed in SAM as excluded from receiving a federal award.

In addition, if OJP anticipates that an award will exceed $250,000 in federal funds, OJP also 

must review and consider any information about the applicant that appears in the non-public 

segment of the integrity and performance system accessible through SAM (currently, the 

Federal Awardee Performance Integrity Information System, FAPIIS).

Important note on FAPIIS: An applicant, at its option, may review and comment on any 

information about itself that currently appears in FAPIIS and was entered by a federal awarding 

agency. OJP will consider any such comments by the applicant, in addition to the other 

information in FAPIIS, in its assessment of the risk posed by the applicant.

All final award decisions will be made by Director of the National Institute of Justice, who may 

take into account not only peer review ratings and NIJ recommendations, but also other factors 

as indicated in this section.

F. Federal Award Administration Information

Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following:

 Federal Award Notices

 Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements

OJP strongly encourages prospective applicants to review information on post-award 

legal requirements and common OJP award conditions prior to submitting an application. 

If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the 

OJP-approved application, the recipient must comply with all award conditions, and all 

applicable requirements of federal statutes and regulations (including applicable 

requirements referred to in the assurances and certifications executed in connection with 

award acceptance).

For additional information on these legal requirements, see the “Administrative, National 

Policy, and Other Legal Requirements” section in the OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide.

 Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses
23

NIJ-2020-17329

 General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements

In addition to the deliverables described in Section A. Program Description, any recipient 

of an award under this solicitation will be required to submit certain reports and data.

Required reports. Recipients typically must submit quarterly financial reports, semiannual progress reports, final financial and progress reports, and, if applicable, an 

annual audit report in accordance with the Part 200 Uniform Requirements or specific 

award conditions. Applicants should anticipate that progress reports will be required to 

follow the non-budgetary components of the Research Performance Progress Report 

(RPPR) template/format. General information on RPPRs may be found at 

www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rppr/. Future awards and fund drawdowns may be withheld 

if reports are delinquent. (In appropriate cases, OJP may require additional reports.)

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information on specific 

post-award reporting requirements, including performance measures data.

G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)

For questions directed to the Federal Awarding Agency, see NCJRS contact information on 

page 2.

For contact information for Grants.gov, see page 2.

H. Other Information

Please see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the following:

 Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a)

 Provide Feedback to OJP
24

NIJ-2020-17329

Application Checklist

Tribal-Researcher Capacity Building Grants Solicitation, Fiscal Year 2020

This application checklist has been created as an aid in developing an application.

What an Applicant Should Do:

Prior to Registering in Grants.gov:

 Acquire a DUNS Number (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Acquire or renew registration with SAM (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

To Register with Grants.gov:

 Acquire AOR and Grants.gov username/password

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Acquire AOR confirmation from the E-Biz POC (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

To Find Funding Opportunity:

 Search for the Funding Opportunity on Grants.gov (see page 18)

 Access Funding Opportunity and Application Package

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Sign up for Grants.gov email notifications (optional)

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Read Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov

 Read OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at

ojp.gov/financialguide/DOJ/PostawardRequirements/chapter3.10a.htm

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

After Application Submission, Receive Grants.gov Email Notifications That:

 (1) application has been received,

 (2) application has either been successfully validated or rejected with errors

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

If No Grants.gov Receipt, and Validation or Error Notifications are Received:

 Contact NIJ regarding technical difficulties

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

Overview of Post-Award Legal Requirements:

 Review the “Overview of Legal Requirements Generally Applicable to OJP Grants and 

Cooperative Agreements – FY 2020 Awards” in the OJP Funding Resource Center.

Scope Requirement:

 The federal amount requested is within the allowable limit(s).

Eligibility Requirement: See cover page.
25

NIJ-2020-17329

What an Application Should Include:

The following items are critical application elements required to pass basic minimum requirements 

review. An application that OJP determines does not include the application elements that must 

be included in the application submission in order for the application to meet the basic minimum 

requirements, will neither proceed to peer review, nor receive further consideration. 

Program Narrative

Budget Detail Worksheet (including Budget Narrative)

Resource Guide)

Resumes/curriculum vitae of key personnel

A tribal resolution or letter of commitment, if 

applicable

(see page 13) 

(see OJP Grant Application 

(see page 16) 

(see page 13)

 Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) (see page 13) 

 Project Abstract (see page 13) 

 Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

 Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

 Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

 Applicant Disclosure and Justification – DOJ High-Risk Grantees (if applicable)

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

Additional Attachments: 

 Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)

 Request and Justification for Employee Compensation; Waiver (if applicable)

(see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide)