alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.9    
    


        

  







MediCor Ltd.  


        THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER
SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH REQUEST MUST BE MADE TO THE CORPORATION'S SECRETARY
AT THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION. 


        Keep
this Certificate in a safe place. If it is lost, stolen or destroyed, the Corporation will require a bond of indemnity as a condition to the issuance of a replacement certificate. 



        The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as through they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: 



	 	TEN COM	 	—	 	as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT	—	 	 
	 	Custodian	 	 

	 	TEN ENT	 	—	 	as tenants by the entireties	 	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 	 	(Minor)
	 	JT TEN	 	—	 	as joint tenants with right	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 	 	 	 	 	of survivorship and not as	 	 	Act	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	tenants in common	 	 	 	 	
 (State)	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	UNIF TRF MIN ACT	—	 	 
	 	Custodian (until age	 	 
	)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	under Uniform Transfers
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Minor)	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to Minors Act	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(State)




Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 



	For Value Received,	 	 
	 	hereby sell, assign and transfer unto








	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 	 
	
	 	 
	 
	 	 








	 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE(S))
	 

	 

	 









	Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
	

 
	
 	

Attorney
	to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.








	Dated	 	 
	 	 

	

In the presence of



 
	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
	

 
	
 	

 








	Signature(s) Guaranteed	 	 
	

By	
 	

 
	
 	

 
	THE SIGNATURES MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM)
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.	 	 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.9
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robert G. Dutcher, Chief
Executive Officer of Possis Medical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.




Date: March 10, 2008             By:  /s/ Robert G. Dutcher
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      ROBERT G. DUTCHER
                                      Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                      Officer

                                       28
# FILED July 8, 1996 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON STATE OF TENNESSEE ) FOR PUBLICATION ) ) NO. 02-S-01-9112-CR-00064 V . ) ) ) SHELBY COUNTY DAVID KEEN ) OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR O nMay 23, 1994, th is Court affirmed petitioner'sconviction for first-degree murder and remanded the cause for resentencing.

Subsequently, the petitioner filed a timely petition pursuant to Rule 39, Tenn. R. App. P. for a rehearing.

We grant the petition to rehear and remand the cause to the trial court for the conduct of a sentencing hearing consonant with our holding in State v. Richard Odom .

Enter this the _____ day of ______________, 1996.

PER CURIAM
#### Herman HALL, Plaintiff-Appellee (heirs of Herman Hall, substituted parties plaintiff) v. SOUTHERN ADVANCE BAG & PAPER CO., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4951.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1935.

For former opinion, see 158 So. 829.

Goff & Goff, of Arcadia, for appellant

James G. Palmer, of Shreveport, and 11. L. Williams, of Arcadia, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The facts and the pleadings in this case are thoroughly discussed and analyzed in our former opinion. 158 So. 829. No useful purpose would he served by repetition herein. Suffice it to say, that we have again studied this case as though we had not previously done so, and arise from our labor convinced that our original opinion is correct; and for this reason said former decree is now reinstated and made final.

DREW, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Precision Castparts Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Donegan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006                            
|                                                 
|/s/ Mark Donegan                                 
|Mark Donegan Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6513 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt from 

regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2022 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

exempt from regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic 

devices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Innovation Ac5 celeration Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES 

7 FROM REGULATION AS DEVICES. 

8 Section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos9 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(h)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6513 IH

1 (1) in the second sentence by inserting before 

2 the period at the end the following: ‘‘or any non3 invasive diagnostic device’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For 

5 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘non6 invasive’ means, with respect to a diagnostic device, 

7 that the device does not penetrate the skin or any 

8 other membrane of the body, is not inserted or im9 planted into the body, causes no more than ephem10 eral compression or temperature changes to in situ 

11 bodily tissues, and does not subject bodily tissues to 

12 ionizing radiation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AMANDA JAMES,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00005

- CR

Appeal from the

244th District Court

of Ector County, Texas

(TC# C

- 17

- 1110

- CR )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss

the appeal. Thi s decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, serving as its
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: May 13, 2010                              /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Principal Financial Officer)




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
December 8, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant

NO. 14-10-00763-CV V.

ISRAEL HERNANDEZ, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeals from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 13, 2010. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


	
  Named Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  2004 Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  2004 Bonus

  	
   

  	
  2005 Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  2005 Bonus Target

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Henri A. Termeer

  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,300,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,770,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,365,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,530,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Earl M. Collier, Jr.

  Executive Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  473,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  462,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  495,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  400,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Georges Gemayel

  Executive Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  430,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  452,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  450,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  400,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Peter Wirth

  Executive Vice President; Chief Legal Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  625,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  455,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  650,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  400,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Michael S. Wyzga

  Executive Vice President; Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  430,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  462,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  450,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  400,000
#### Ike GRIMES and Nellie B. Grimes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF RUSTON, Defendant-Appellee. *

No. 5209.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 30, 1936.

John E. Warren, of Ruston, for appellants.

Barksdale, Warren & Barksdale, of Ruston, for appellee.

*

Rehearing denied June *2,*1930.

PIAMITER, Judge.

In this case, plaintiffs’ adopted daughter, aged fifteen, was drowned at the same time and place and under similar circumstances as the deceased children involved in the case of Lizzie and Ed Peters v. Town of Ruston, 167 So. 491, this day decided by us. The allegations of the petition herein are substantially identical with *494those of the petition in that case, and the appeal has been prosecuted from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action. Therefore, for the reasons assigned in the Peters Case, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF  PENN-PACIFIC  CORPORATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS  THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       95
<OTHER-SE>                                     (104)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                          <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    NOV-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         FEB-26-1999
<CASH>                                       924
<SECURITIES>                               3,748
<RECEIVABLES>                              4,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                (583)
<INVENTORY>                                5,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          14,353 
<PP&E>                                     1,949
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            14,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,175
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   1,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                11,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              14,551
<SALES>                                    5,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,774
<CGS>                                      3,715 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              661
<INCOME-TAX>                                 264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          396
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .29 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, PAUL J. EVANSON, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                     |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/    Paul J. Evanson                     
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | Paul J. Evanson Principal Executive Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6648 

To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of military or security assistance 

to Ukraine until operational control of the United States — Mexico 

border is achieved, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2022 

Mr. ROSENDALE (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. GAETZ, 

Mr. GOSAR, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. NORMAN, 

Mr. POSEY, and Mr. WEBER of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition 

to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of military or security assistance to Ukraine until operational control of 

the United States — Mexico border is achieved, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure America’s Bor5 ders First Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6648 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds described in 

3 subsection (b) may be obligated or expended until the date 

4 on which— 

5 (1) a border wall system along the United 

6 States — Mexico border is completed; and 

7 (2) operational control, as such term is defined 

8 in section 2 of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (8 

9 U.S.C. 1701 note), of such border is achieved. 

10 (b) FUNDS DESCRIBED.—The funds described in this 

11 subsection are the following, with respect to programs, 

12 projects, or activities in Ukraine: 

13 (1) Amounts authorized to be appropriated or 

14 otherwise made available to the Department of De15 fense for any fiscal year. 

16 (2) Amounts authorized to be appropriated or 

17 otherwise made available for security assistance or 

18 security cooperation for any fiscal year. 

19 (c) BORDER WALL SYSTEM.—For purposes of this 

20 Act, a border wall system shall include— 

21 (1) 30-foot high internally hardened steel22 bollard physical barrier; 

23 (2) all-weather access and patrol roads; 

24 (3) perimeter lighting; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6648 IH

1 (4) enforcement cameras, sensors, and anti-tun2 nel detection technology. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS