alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6889 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 11, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to modify the frequency of board of directors meetings, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6889 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Union Board 

3 Modernization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FREQUENCY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS. 

5 Section 113 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

6 U.S.C. 1761b) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘monthly’’ each place such term 

8 appears; 

9 (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

10 striking ‘‘The board of directors’’ and inserting the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The board of directors’’; 

13 (3) in subsection (a) (as so designated), by 

14 striking ‘‘shall meet at least once a month and’’; and 

15 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(b) MEETINGS.—The board of directors of a Federal 

17 credit union shall meet as follows: 

18 ‘‘(1) With respect to a de novo Federal credit 

19 union, not less frequently than monthly during each 

20 of the first five years of the existence of such Fed21 eral credit union. 

22 ‘‘(2) Not less than six times annually, with at 

23 least one meeting held during each fiscal quarter, 

24 with respect to a Federal credit union— 

25 ‘‘(A) with composite rating of either 1 or 

26 2 under the Uniform Financial Institutions 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6889 RFS

1 Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a 

2 comparable rating system); and 

3 ‘‘(B) with a capability of management rat4 ing under such composite rating of either 1 or 

5 2. 

6 ‘‘(3) Not less frequently than once a month, 

7 with respect to a Federal credit union— 

8 ‘‘(A) with composite rating of either 3, 4, 

9 or 5 under the Uniform Financial Institutions 

10 Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a 

11 comparable rating system); or 

12 ‘‘(B) with a capability of management rat13 ing under such composite rating of either 3, 4, 

14 or 5.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

16 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

17 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

18 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

19 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

20 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

21 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, proVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:23 Oct 12, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6889.RFS H6889

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 6889 RFS

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24

A power of attorney in the following form has been executed by each director of
Citicorp.

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director and/or
Officer of CITICORP, a Delaware corporation, and/or CITIBANK, N.A., a national
association hereby constitutes and appoints each of GREGORY C. EHLKE, PETER M.
GALLANT, ANN M. GOODBODY, JOHN F. RICE and MARTIN A. WATERS his true and lawful
attorney and agent, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, to do any and
all acts and things in connection with the registration statement dated the date
hereof (the "Registration Statement") to be filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission or the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, including specifically, but without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the power and authority to execute the Registration Statement in the
name of the undersigned in his capacity as Director and/or Officer of Citicorp
and/or Citibank, N.A., any and all amendments, including post-effective
amendments, to the Registration Statement, any and all documents and instruments
filed as part of or in connection with the Registration Statement or amendments
thereto, any and all documents and instruments which the said attorney and agent
may deem necessary or advisable to enable Citicorp and/or Citibank, N.A. to
comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and any rules and regulations and requirements of the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, or with any
rules and regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and any
and all documents and instruments which the said attorney and agent may deem
necessary or advisable to enable Citicorp and/or Citibank, N.A. to comply with
the securities or other similar laws of jurisdictions outside of the United
States of America in respect thereof; and

      HEREBY RATIFIES AND CONFIRMS all that the said attorneys and agents, or
any of them, has done, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof; and

      HEREBY REVOKES all prior powers of attorney relating to the foregoing
acts.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand.

Dated: February 5, 1997


                                             _________________________
                                             Name:
                                             Title:  Director
E**XHIBIT 32(b)****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Henry G. Schopfer, III, Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”), certify,that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Henry G. Schopfer, III Henry G. Schopfer, III    Chief Financial Officer    Date: May 7, 2007  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KHASHION M. GARLAND,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 24 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of June, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2007                       /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
Schedule of Ommitted Lease Agreements



 Exhibit 10.8 
  
 Schedule of Omitted Lease Agreement 
  
 The following lease agreement has not been filed as an exhibit to this Post Effective Amendment No. One to the Registration Statement
pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K: 
  

	1.	Master Lease Agreement dated December 3, 2004 by and between Blue Mountain Resort Limited Partnership, as Landlord and CNL Income Canada Lessee Corp., as Tenant


  
 The terms of the Omitted Lease Agreement for the Blue Mountain
resort village property is substantially similar to the Master Lease Agreement dated December 3, 2004 by and between Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership, as Landlord and CNL Income Canada Lessee Corp., as Tenant, which was filed as Exhibit
10.7 to CNL Income Properties, Inc.’s Post Effective Amendment No. One to the Registration Statement. 
  
 The Omitted Lease Agreement provides for four five-year extensions of the lease term as opposed to only two extensions under the Whistler resort village property lease. In addition, there are negative covenants under
the Blue Mountain lease which address limitations specific to its facilities. Further, under the Blue Mountain lease we may be required to obtain certain consents under the Planning Act covering subdivision development which are not provided for
under the Whistler resort village property lease.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-31103

Summary Calendar

 

MARION BURTON; SANDRA BURTON,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

CITY OF HAMMOND; POLICE CHIEF, for the City of Hammond;

JAMES BANKS, JR., Officer,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-2096

- - - - - - - - - -

December 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Banks, Jr., the City of Hammond (“the City”), and the

Police Chief of Hammond (“the Chief”) appeal from the denial of

their motion for summary judgment in the civil-rights action

brought by Marion and Sandra Burton. The defendants argue that

the district court erred by denying their summary-judgment motion

on the merits of their qualified-immunity defense and the merits

of their argument against the liability of the City and the

Chief.
No. 97-31103

-2-

We must determine the basis of our jurisdiction, on our own

motion, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). The district court rejected Banks’s qualifiedimmunity defense on the grounds that he had failed to show that

his actions were objectively reasonable on the facts before the

court; we have jurisdiction over Banks’s appeal from the denial

of summary judgment on qualified immunity. Naylor v. Louisiana,

127 F.3d 855, 857 (5th Cir. 1997). With the sole exception of

the qualified-immunity defense, the district court’s order

denying summary judgment is a nonappealable interlocutory order. 

We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the defendants’

contentions apart from qualified immunity, and we dismiss the

appeal except for that portion of the appeal addressing qualified

immunity.

Regarding the qualified immunity defense, we have reviewed

the record and the briefs of the parties and we have found no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the

reasons stated by the district court at the hearing held in

conjunction with the order denying summary judgment. See Burton

v. Hammond, No. 95-CV-2096 (E.D. La. Sep. 19, 1997).

APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this quarterly  report of Possis  Medical,  Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  ("the  Report"),  I, Robert G.  Dutcher,  Chief
Executive  Officer  of Possis  Medical,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.




March 4, 2005                                        /s/ Robert G. Dutcher
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Robert G. Dutcher
                                                         Chairman, President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                       27
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brown & Brown, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Powell Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or § 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 6, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ J. Powell Brown    
|J. Powell Brown        
|Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT THE HILLS AT LEHIGH VALLEY, LP, Petitioner

v.
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON REVENUE APPEALS BOARD AND BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 84 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Revision to a Currently Approved Information Collection; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information 
collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until October 27, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
NCUA Clearance Officer or OMB Reviewer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Jeryl Fish, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax 
No. 703-837-2861, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#39767a70767458505579575a4c58175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f000c0600022e26230f212c3a2e61282039">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    OMB Number: 3133-0004.
    Form Number: NCUA 5300.
    Type of Review: Revision to the currently approved collection.
    Title: Revisions to NCUA Call Reports.
    Description: The financial and statistical information is essential 
to NCUA in carrying out its responsibility for the supervision of 
federally insured credit unions. The information also enables NCUA to 
monitor all federally insured credit unions whose share accounts are 
insured by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF).
    Respondents: All Credit Unions.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 8,049.
    Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 6.6 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 212,494.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: N/A.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on August 20, 
2008.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-19795 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### SALONE v. SHREVEPORT RYS. CO.

No. 7358.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 30, 1949.

*241Freyer, Goode, Nelson & Freyer, Shreveport, for appellant.

Stephens & Allen, Bryan E. Bush, Jos. H. Stephens, Jr., Shreveport, for appellee.

HARDY, Judge.

Plaintiff in this cause, one of four consolidated suits, seeks to recover damages in the sum of $17,825.00 arising from the death of his minor child, an 18 year old son. After trial there was judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $3,825.00, from which judgment defendant has appealed, which appeal has been answered by plaintiff praying for an increase in the judgment to the full amount stated above.

In addition to the points covered in our opinion in Moch v. Shreveport Railways Company, 41 So.2d 741, there is one point which is peculiar to this suit.

At the time of the accident the decedent was riding on the left running board in a position near the rear fender, in violation of an ordinance of the City of Shreveport making unlawful the act of riding on the fenders, running board, hood or any other place on the outside of an au-tomobile. This is urged as an additional defense in this particular case.

There is no evidence in the record which indicates that the position of the decedent, Ardis Salone, on the running board of the car driven by Petteway was a Contributing cause in any degree whatsoever to the happening of the accident. It is well established that the negligent act of a person riding on a running board is not sufficient to preclude recovery. Robinson v. Miller, La.App., 177 So. 440. This is true even in cases where the probabilities are that plaintiff would not have been injured had he been inside the car. Stout v. Lewis, 11 La.App. 503, 123 So. 346.

As to the quantum, we are convinced that the award of the District Court was inadequate. Plaintiff established, without' any serious controversy, that he received weekly financial assistance of some $7.00 to $10.00 from the decedent, and that his deceased son was accustomed to help him with his farming operations on his days off. In consideration of the contributions of financial support and services, and the loss of the companionship and filial devotion of a good son, we think the award should be increased.

'For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is amended by increasing the amount of judgment in favor of plaintiff to the sum of $5,325.00, and as amended, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Powell
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Don R. Madison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:    May 30, 2003                      /s/ DON R. MADISON
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Don R. Madison
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer