alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 173 (Friday, September 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20630]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6340]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Garden & Cosmos: The Royal Paintings of Jodhpur''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Garden & Cosmos: The Royal Paintings of 
Jodhpur,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 
from on or about October 11, 2008, until on or about January 4, 2009; 
at the Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, WA, from on or about January 29, 
2009, to on or about April 26, 2009, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: August 22, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs,Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-20630 Filed 9-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Markland Technologies, Inc.; Order of Suspension 
of Trading

August 27, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Markland Technologies, Inc. (``Markland'') because it has not filed any 
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2005. Markland is 
quoted on the Pink Sheets OTC Markets, Inc. under the ticker symbol 
MRKL.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 
August 27, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 10, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20220 Filed 8-27-08; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EX-32   ·   Section 1350 Certifications




GENEMEN INC.





Pursuant to Section  18U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002 (subsection  (a) and (b) of  section  1350,  chapter
63 of title 18, United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned  officers  of Genemen Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  May 31, 2009  (the  "Form  10-K")  of  the  Company   fully   complies   with  the requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  information  contained  in the  Form  10-K  fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  August 17, 2009





/s/ Qiaozhen Chen


Qiaozhen Chen


Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this report on Form 10-Q for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





Stephen M. Spray, the president and chief executive officer, and Michael J. Sewell, the chief financial officer, of Cincinnati Financial Corporation each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:


1. the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and


2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cincinnati Financial Corporation.





Date: October 24, 2024





/S/ Stephen M. SprayStephen M. SprayPresident and Chief Executive Officer/S/ Michael J. SewellMichael J. Sewell, CPAChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Accounting Officer)
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 7, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 0930

Lower Tribunal No. 08

- 0531

- P

________________



### Marlen Cantero Mesa

, et al.,

Appellant s

,

vs.



### The Bank of New York Mellon

, 

### etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis Garcia

, Judge.

The People's Advocate, PLLC, and Joseph Brien (Hallandale Beach)

, for appellant s

.

De L uca Law Group, PLLC, and Kimberly George (Ft. Lauderdale) , for

appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO, and BOKOR , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10(c)(ii). Second Amendment to the McDonald’s Corporation Supplemental Profit
Sharing And Savings Plan 
  

	1.	Section 1.1(a) of the McDonald’s Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
thereof: 

  
 “Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Plan, no Deferral Elections shall be permitted under this Plan with respect to compensation that would be paid to Participants (absent deferral) on or after January 1, 2005.” 
  
 Except as herein amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

  
 Executed in multiple originals this 1st day of December 2004.

  

			
	McDonald’s Corporation
	
	     /S/ Richard Floersch


	 By
	 	 Richard Floersch
 Executive Vice President–
 Human Resources



  

 64    McDonald’s Corporation
Exhibit 10







Exhibit 10.2 



 






 



Internet Capital Group 



2005 Bonus Plan Award



 



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors evaluated ICG's performance against the goals established in the Internet Capital Group 2005 Bonus Plan and declared a bonus level of         %. 



 



Based on the Board's evaluation and your service during 2005, your 2005 total bonus will be $             or         % of your annual target bonus which will be paid on                     .
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SUSANA BALDWIN, ) a/k/a SUSANA SANCHES LUVIANO ) BALDWIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2370 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Keith Spoto, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Precision Castparts Corp.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William D. Larsson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

Date:February 11, 2005

 
| /s/  William.D. Larsson   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| William D. Larsson        |
| Senior Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0000076741
   <NAME>  Payco American Corp.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Amber Dawn Russell, * From the 118th District

Court of Howard County,

Trial Court No. 14568.

Vs. No. 11-15-00303-CR * December 31, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Virtual
Radiologic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
the Report.  Date:
  March 17, 2008
  
  By:
  /s/
  Sean O. Casey, M.D.Sean
  O. Casey, M.D.Chief
  Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 99.10

B. Ainsworth, P. Eng.

September 28, 2006

|Re: | Energy Metals Corporation           
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | Annual Information Form and Form 40F

I am the author of the Technical Report entitled Antelope
Project, Fremont, Sweetwater and Converse Counties, Wyoming, dated January 14,
2005 collectively (the Technical Report) referred to in the Annual Information
Form and Form 40F of Energy Metals Corporation. dated September 28, 2006 (the
"AIF and 40F"). I consent to being named in both the AIF and 40F and to the use
of the Reports in both the AIF and 40F.

I have read both the AIF and 40F and confirm that:

| | (a) | I have no reason to believe that there are any
      misrepresentations in the information contained in both the AIF and 40F
      derived from the Report or that is within my knowledge as a result of the
      investigations and enquiries made by me in connection with the preparation
      of the Report; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (b) | the section in the AIF headed Description of Business
      fairly and accurately summarizes the Report and omits no material
      information contained in the Report.                                                                                                                                            

Yours truly,

Per: /s/ B Ainsworth, P. Eng.

---
exv10w11



 






Exhibit 10.11 Summary of 2005 Compensation for Non-employee Directors



For 2005, the board of directors has approved the following annual compensation to directors
who are not employees:




Cash compensation





	 	•  	Retainer of $3,750 per month
	 
	 	•  	$1,600 for each board meeting attended (or $1,600 per day for multi-day meetings)
	 
	 	•  	$1,600 for each committee or other meeting attended if not held on the same day as a
board meeting
	 
	 	•  	$2,000 to the committee chairpersons for each committee meeting attended as
compensation for the chairperson’s preparation time
	 
	 	•  	Reimbursement for customary and usual travel expenses





Stock compensation





	 	•  	1,500 shares of Lilly stock in a deferred stock account in the Lilly Directors’
Deferral Plan, payable after service on the board has ended.





Lilly Directors’ Deferral Plan



This plan allows directors to defer receipt of all or part of their retainer and meeting fees until
after their service on the board has ended. Each director can choose to invest the funds in either
of two accounts:





	 	•  	Deferred Compensation Account. Funds in this account earn interest each year at
an annual rate of 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate as established for
the preceding December by the U.S. Treasury Department under Section 1274(d) of the
Internal Revenue Code with monthly compounding.
	 
	 	•  	Deferred Share Account. This account allows the director, in effect, to invest
his or her deferred cash compensation in Lilly stock. In addition, the annual award of shares to each director noted above is credited to this account. Funds in this account
are credited as hypothetical shares of Lilly stock based on the market price of the stock
at the time the compensation would otherwise have been earned. Hypothetical dividends are
“reinvested” in additional shares based on the market price of the stock on the date
dividends are paid. All shares in the deferred share accounts are hypothetical and are
not issued or transferred until the director ends his or her service on the board or dies.




Both accounts may be paid in a lump sum or in annual installments for up to 10 years. The deferred
compensation account may also be paid in monthly installments for up to 10 years. Amounts in the
deferred share account are paid in the form of shares of Lilly stock.




Insurance



The company provides $250,000 of accidental death and dismemberment insurance to each non-employee
director.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6891 

To exclude government officials of the Russian Federation from certain 

international meetings, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2022 

Mrs. WAGNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To exclude government officials of the Russian Federation 

from certain international meetings, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Isolate Russian Gov5 ernment Officials Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF THE 

7 RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

8 (a) POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES.—It is the pol9 icy of the United States to exclude government officials 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6891 IH

1 of the Russian Federation, to the maximum extent prac2 ticable, from attendance at the following: 

3 (1) The Spring Meetings and Annual Meetings 

4 of the World Bank Group and the International 

5 Monetary Fund. 

6 (2) Proceedings of the Group of 20, including 

7 Ministerial Meetings and Leader Summits. 

8 (3) Plenary meetings of the Financial Action 

9 Task Force. 

10 (4) Annual General Meetings of the Bank for 

11 International Settlements. 

12 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of the Treas13 ury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

14 System, as the case may be, shall take all necessary steps 

15 to advance the policy described under subsection (a). 

16 (c) TERMINATION.—This section shall have no force 

17 or effect on the earlier of— 

18 (1) the date that is 5 years after the date of en19 actment of this Act; or 

20 (2) 30 days after the date that the President 

21 reports to Congress that the government of the Rus22 sian Federation has ceased its destabilizing activities 

23 with respect to the sovereignty and territorial integ24 rity of Ukraine. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Philip O. Nolan,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stanley, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|                          |   | /s/ PHILIP O. NOLAN                             |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  June 1, 2007 |   | Philip O. Nolan                                 |
|                     |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----