52296 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Notices 

‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary 

Results’’ section, we have adjusted 

DHE’s reported entered values. 

To determine whether the duty 

assessment rates were de minimis, in 

accordance with the requirement set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

rates based on the Sunflag’s entered 

values and DHE’s adjusted entered 

values. Where the assessment rate is 

above de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to assess duties on all entries of subject 

merchandise by that importer. Pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate without regard to 

antidumping duties any entries for 

which the assessment rate is de minimis 

(i.e., less than 0.50 percent). 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 

clarification applies to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by the respondent for which it did not 

know its merchandise was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. For a full discussion of this 

clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following antidumping duty 

deposits are effective for all shipments 

of SSB from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption, effective on or after the 

publication date of these final results of 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rates for the reviewed company 

will be the rate listed above (except no 

cash deposit will be required if a 

company’s weighted-average margin is 

de minimis); (2) for merchandise 

exported by manufacturers or exporters 

not covered in this review but covered 

in the original less-than-fair-value 

investigation or a previous review, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

most recent rate published in the final 

determination or final results for which 

the manufacturer or exporter received 

an individual rate; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, the 

previous review, or the original 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any previous reviews, 

the cash deposit rate will be 12.45 

percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established 

in the less than fair value investigation. 

See Stainless Steel Bar from India; Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 59 FR 66915 (December 28, 

1994). These cash deposit requirements 

shall remain in effect until publication 

of the final results of the next 

administrative review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of review in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: September 3, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

List of Comments in the Decision 

Memorandum 

Comments Relating to D.H. Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

Comment 1: Alleged Missing Attachments 

Comment 2: Direct Material Costs—Use of 

Pre-POR Costs 

Comments Relating to Sunflag Iron & Steel 

Co. Ltd. 

Comment 3: Sunflag’s Ferrochrome 

Purchases from Affiliate Navbharat 

Ventures 

Comment 4: Rent Sunflag Paid to Affiliate, 

Ridge Farm Developers, for New Delhi 

Office 

Comment 5: Rent Sunflag Paid to Affiliate, 

Haryana Television, for Faridabad Office 

Comment 6: Adjustment to Interest on 

Working Capital Loan 

Comment 7: Imputed Interest on Unsecured 

Interest-Free Loan from Affiliate Sunflag 

Ltd. UK 

Comment 8: Home Market Imputed Credit 

Expenses 

[FR Doc. E8–20925 Filed 9–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 9, 

2008. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that 

a request for a new shipper review of 

the antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the Peoples 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), received on 

July 11, 2008, meets the statutory and 

regulatory requirements for initiation. 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) of this 

new shipper review is January 1, 2008, 

through June 30, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Demitrios Kalogeropoulos or Robert 

Boiling, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2623 

and (202) 482–4207, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice announcing the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC was 

published on January 4, 2005. See 

Notice of Amended Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 

Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 

4, 2005). On July 11, 2008, we received 

a timely request for a new shipper 

review from Shanghai Fangjia Industry 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Fangjia’’) in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(c) and 

351.214(d)(2). Shanghai Fangjia has 

certified that it purchased from Jiangsu 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Notices 52297 

Danyang Brilliant Furniture Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Brilliant Furniture’’) all of the wooden 

bedroom furniture it exported which is 

the basis for its request for a new 

shipper review. 

Initiation of New Shipper Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214( )(2), 

Shanghai Fangjia certified that it did not 

export wooden bedroom furniture to the 

United States during the period of 

investigation (‘‘POI’’). Pursuant to 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Shanghai 

Fangjia certified that, since the 

initiation of the investigation, it has not 

been affiliated with any exporter or 

producer who exported wooden 

bedroom furniture to the United States 

during the POT, including those not 

individually examined during the 

investigation. As required by 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), Shanghai Fangjia 

also certified that its export activities 

were not controlled by the central 

government of the PRC. 

In addition to the certifications 

described above, the exporter submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) The date on which it first 

shipped wooden bedroom furniture for 

export to the United States and the date 

on which the wooden bedroom 

furniture was first entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption; (2) the volume of its first 

shipment; and (3) The date of its first 

sale to an unaffiliated customer in the 

United States. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we are 

initiating this new shipper review for 

shipments of wooden bedroom furniture 

from the PRC produced and exported by 

Shanghai Fangjia. 

The POR is January 1, 2008, through 

June 30, 2008. 19 CFR 

351.214(g)(1)(i)(B). We intend to issue 

preliminary results of these reviews no 

later than 180 days from the date of 

initiation, and final results of these 

reviews no later than 90 days from the 

date of the preliminary results, unless 

extended. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Act. 

On August 17, 2006, the Pension 

Protection Act of 2006 (‘‘H.R. 4’’) was 

signed into law. Section 1632 of H.R. 4 

temporarily suspends the authority of 

the Department to instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to collect a bond 

or other security in lieu of a cash 

deposit in new shipper reviews during 

the period April 1, 2006, through June 

30, 2009. Therefore, the posting of a 

bond or other security under section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act in lieu of a 

cash deposit is not available in this case. 

Importers of wooden bedroom furniture 

manufactured by Brilliant Furniture and 

exported by Shanghai Fangjia must 

continue to post a cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties on each 

entry of subject merchandise at the 

current PRC-wide rate of 216.01 percent. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

proprietary information in this new 

shipper review should submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. This initiation and notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: August 26, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–20541 Filed 9–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before September 

29, 2008. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 2104. 

Docket Number: 08–043. Applicant: 

Harvard University, 7 Divinity Ave., SF 

267C, Cambridge, MA 02138. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 

Tecnai G2 F20 TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, the Netherlands. Intended 

Use: The instrument is intended to be 

used to study macromolecular 

complexes involved in a variety of 

cellular functions. The high-resolution 

information obtained with the 

instrument will be used to elucidate the 

chemical structure of these biological 

molecules and connect the structures to 

their function. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: August 15, 

2008. 

Docket Number: 08–044. Applicant: 

Pennsylvania University, College of 

Medicine; 500 University Drive, 

Hershey, PA 17033. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope, Model JEM–1400. 

Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. 

Intended Use: This instrument will be 

used to study a wide range of biological 

materials, including biological samples 

of tissues from a variety of vertebrate 

species and from various organs. 

Specifically, the instrument will be used 

to identify detailed tissue structures in 

order to understand both normal 

physiology and pathophysiology. 

Application accepted by Commissioner 

of Customs: August 15, 2008. 

Docket Number: 08–045. Applicant: 

University of Texas at Austin, 1 

University Station, A4800, Austin, TX 

78712. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 

Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

is intended to be used to examine 

biological specimens using transmission 

electron microscopy. The instrument 

will be used for a wide variety of 

samples applications. Application 

accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 

August 21, 2008. 

Dated: August 28, 2008. 

Faye Robinson, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. E8–20545 Filed 9–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–936] 

Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel 

Line Pipe from the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) preliminarily 

determines that countervailable 

subsidies are being provided to 

producers and exporters of circular 

welded carbon quality steel line pipe 

(line pipe) from the People’s Republic of 

China (the PRC). For information on the 

estimated subsidy rates, see the 

‘‘Suspension of Liquidation’’ section of 

this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 9, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson or John Conniff, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 3, Operations, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES