U.S. Department of Justice OMB No. 1121-0329 

Office of Justice Programs 

National Institute of Justice 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) is pleased to announce that it is seeking applications for funding related to 

research and evaluation on violence against women—specifically projects on sexual violence, 

stalking, and teen dating violence. This program furthers the Department’s mission by 

sponsoring research to provide objective, independent, evidence-based knowledge and tools to 

meet the challenges of crime and justice, particularly at the State and local levels. 

Solicitation: Research and Evaluation on 

Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Teen Dating 

Violence 

Eligibility 

In general, NIJ is authorized to make grants to, or enter into contracts or cooperative 

agreements with, States (including territories), local governments (including federallyrecognized Indian tribal governments as determined by the Secretary of the Interior and 

published in the Federal Register), nonprofit and profit organizations (including tribal nonprofit 

and profit organizations), institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions of higher 

education), and certain qualified individuals. Foreign governments, foreign organizations, and 

foreign institutions of higher education are not eligible to apply. 

Deadline 

Registration with OJP’s Grant Management System (GMS) is required prior to application 

submission. (See “How to Apply,” page 8.) 

All applications are due by 11:45 p.m. eastern time on June 1, 2010. 

(See “Deadlines: Registration and Application,” page 3.) 

Contact Information 

For technical assistance with submitting the application, contact the Grants Management System 

Support Hotline at 1–888–549–9901, option 3 or via e-mail to GMS.HelpDesk@usdoj.gov. 

Note: The GMS Support Hotline hours of operation are Monday–Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 

midnight eastern time, except for Federal holidays. 

For assistance with any other requirement of this solicitation, contact: for sexual violence, Karen 

Bachar, Social Science Analyst, at 202–514–4403 or by e-mail to Karen.Bachar@usdoj.gov; for 

stalking, Bernie Auchter, Senior Social Science Analyst, at 202–307–0154 or by e-mail to 

Bernie.Auchter@usdoj.gov; and for teen dating violence, Carrie Mulford, Social Science 

Analyst, at 202–307–2959 or by to e-mail to Carrie.Mulford@usdoj.gov. 

SL# 000929 
CONTENTS 

Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3

Deadlines: Registration and Application ........................................................................... 3 

Eligibility ............................................................................................................................ 3 

Specific Information .......................................................................................................... 3 

Performance Measures ..................................................................................................... 8 

How to Apply ..................................................................................................................... 8 

What an Application Must Include ................................................................................... 10 

Standard Form 424 ............................................................................................. 10 

Program Narrative ............................................................................................... 11 

Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative ................................................. 13 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) ...................................................... 13 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) ........................................................ 13 

Other Standard Forms ........................................................................................ 14 

Selection Criteria ............................................................................................................. 14 

Review Process .............................................................................................................. 16 

Additional Requirements ................................................................................................. 16 

Application Checklist ....................................................................................................... 19 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

2
Research and Evaluation on Sexual Violence, 

Stalking, and Teen Dating Violence 

CFDA No. 16.560 

Overview 

NIJ seeks applications for funding for research to help increase women’s safety and improve the 

justice system and related responses to sexual violence, stalking, and teen dating violence. 

Research is sought on the criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence and stalking; 

the extent of the problem of teen dating violence and characteristics of abusive teen 

relationships; and the evaluation of the impact and effectiveness of teen dating violence 

programs, policies, and legislation in addressing teen dating violence. Applications addressing 

other areas of research on violence against women, such as intimate partner violence will be 

accepted. However, applicants are strongly encouraged to consider NIJ’s stated research 

priorities as they are outlined in this solicitation. 

Visit http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/223572.pdf for a summary of NIJ research projects in the 

areas of violence and victimization.

Authorizing Legislation: Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (sections 201 

and 202). 

Deadlines: Registration and Application 

Registration is required prior to submission. The deadline to register in GMS is 11:45 p.m. 

eastern time on June 1, 2010, and the deadline for applying for funding under this 

announcement is 11:45 p.m. eastern time on June 1, 2010. Please see the “How to Apply” 

section, page 8, for more details. 

Eligibility 

Please refer to the title page for eligibility information under this program. 

Specific Information—Research and Evaluation on Sexual 

Violence, Stalking, and Teen Dating Violence

Research and Evaluation on Sexual Violence 

Sexual violence is one of the most underreported crimes in the United States and includes a 

wide range of unwanted behaviors that are attempted or completed against a victim's will or 

when a victim cannot consent because of age, disability, or the influence of alcohol or drugs. 

Sexual assault can have devastating effects that can last a lifetime. According to the National 

Violence Against Women Survey, 1 in 6 American women has been the victim of a completed or 

attempted sexual assault during her lifetime. In addition to the immediate trauma, victims face 

the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. Long-term mental health effects can 

include depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, yet many victims do not report. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

3
In cases where victims do report, few cases make it through the criminal justice system. NIJ is 

particularly interested in applications that build on existing research and address the following 

issues:

 Sexual violence in underserved groups. Applicants are encouraged to submit 

proposals that examine sexual violence experienced by women from diverse 

backgrounds. Such an examination might address one or more of the following 

factors: racial or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, cognitive or physical ability, 

homeless status, or employment history. NIJ is particularly interested in studies of 

victimization rates, reporting behaviors, service needs, and use of support services 

for these populations. 

 Reporting, processing, and attrition of sexual assault cases. Applicants are 

encouraged to submit proposals that examine potential barriers to reporting posed by 

the criminal justice system in communities or on campuses. NIJ is also interested in 

innovative initiatives that attempt to reduce or remove such barriers in both stranger 

and non-stranger cases. In addition, NIJ is interested in supporting studies that 

examine the relationship between specialized investigation or prosecution units, 

victim/perpetrator/case characteristics and case attrition rates and outcomes. 

 Forensic Compliance. NIJ is interested in funding research that addresses the 

needs of victims and provides organizations with information that aids in their efforts 

to provide forensic exams to sexual assault victims. After implementation of the 

Violence Against Women Act some victims reported that they could receive a 

forensic medical exam only if they planned to cooperate with law enforcement and/or 

pay for the cost of the exam. Federal STOP grant program eligibility provisions 

enacted in 2006, however, have the effect of requiring participating States to incur 

the full out-of-pocket cost of forensic medical exams to victims of sexual assault 

without the requirements for participation in the criminal justice system or 

cooperation with law enforcement (see 42 U.S.C. § 3796gg-4). 

NIJ seeks to fund a multi-site gap analysis to examine law enforcement, prosecution, 

healthcare, and advocacy adherence to the requirements of this Act. Applicants may 

limit their estimates to specific geographical areas (e.g. three or more local 

jurisdictions, a single state or multiple states). Questions include but are not limited 

to: 

- Are some victims still being charged either directly or indirectly for the cost of a 

forensic medical exam? 

- Are victims still being required to cooperate with law enforcement in order to 

receive a forensic medical exam? 

- Do policies and practices related to the maintenance of rape kits vary based on 

victims’ intent to report? 

- How are states working toward implementing changes to their policies and 

procedures to ensure that the needs of sexual assault victims are being 

addressed (e.g., the provision of training or awareness programs)? 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

4
Research and Evaluation on Stalking 

According to a recent Bureau of Justice Statistics report, an estimated 3.4 million people age 18 

and older were victims of stalking in a 12-month period in 2005 and 2006. Stalking is an 

evolving crime and researching the topic has broad implications for criminal justice practitioners 

and policymakers. NIJ has funded studies on intimate partner violence that include stalking as a 

type of victimization; however, NIJ has funded very few studies solely on stalking. NIJ seeks 

proposals to gain research knowledge to increase victim safety and improve the justice system 

and related responses to intimate partner stalking. NIJ is specifically interested in proposals that 

address one of the following areas: 

 Examination of police decisions to make arrests in stalking cases. 

 Examination of effective strategies for enhancing criminal justice response to stalking 

cases (i.e., reporting, investigation, arrest, and prosecution). 

 Evaluation of justice system responses to stalking. Evaluations may assess policies 

or initiatives that facilitate the detection, apprehension, and/or prosecution of stalking 

offenders across jurisdictional boundaries. Attention to the effectiveness of 

coordinated community responses to stalking is encouraged. Evaluation of police 

and community outreach and education about stalking should also be considered. 

Research and Evaluation on Teen Dating Violence

NIJ is also soliciting proposals for research and evaluation in the area of adolescent relationship 

abuse. This is sometimes referred to as teen dating violence, intimate relationship violence, or 

intimate partner violence among adolescents. For this solicitation, the term ”abuse” includes 

physical abuse, sexual abuse, harassment, stalking, or psychological abuse in the context of a 

past or present romantic/consensual relationship of any person between the ages of 12 and 18. 

National estimates from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey and the National Longitudinal Study of 

Adolescent Health indicate that approximately 1 in 10 adolescents reported being a victim of 

physical violence at the hand of a romantic partner in the past year. Rates of psychological 

abuse victimization are even higher; between 2 in 10 and 3 in 10 adolescents indicate they have 

been verbally or psychologically abused. In FY 2008 and 2009, NIJ solicited research focusing 

on teen dating violence, which resulted in six funded projects. These projects are evaluating 

school, community, and family-based prevention and intervention programs; examining teen 

dating violence related behaviors from adolescence into young adulthood; exploring dynamics 

of intimate relationships among high risk adolescents; and developing an understanding of teen 

dating violence among Latinos. Under this solicitation, proposals that help us to understand the 

nature and extent of adolescent relationship abuse are encouraged. The following priority areas 

are specifically encouraged: 

 Research on the extent of the problem and characteristics of abusive teen 

relationships. Priority research in this area includes studies that: 

- Illuminate the prevalence and incidence of adolescent relationship abuse in 

representative samples of adolescents of both sexes as well as diverse ages, 

races/ethnicities, social classes, sexual orientations, acculturation levels, and 

regions. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

5
- Use qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the context in which 

adolescent relationship abuse occurs, the ways in which adolescents define 

power in relationships, and the meanings adolescents attach to violence and 

other types of relationship abuse. 

- Use qualitative and quantitative methods to capture gender differences in abuse 

patterns and/or the reciprocal abuse that occurs in adolescent relationships. 

- Employ short-term longitudinal designs to examine the progression of 

relationship abuse within a relationship and the stability of teen dating violence 

perpetration and victimization as individuals move between partners. 

- Focus on adolescents’ use of technology as a means of perpetrating relationship 

abuse. 

 Evaluation of teen dating violence programs, policies, and legislation.

Proposals that evaluate the effectiveness of policies, laws, and programs that are 

either intended to prevent or respond to adolescent relationship abuse are also 

strongly encouraged. Specifically, priority will be given to rigorous research that: 

- Evaluates community, school and/or web-based programs that are designed to 

prevent relationship abuse among adolescents or respond to adolescent victims 

of relationship abuse. 

- Evaluates the effectiveness of victim services and the justice system in 

responding to teen dating violence. 

- Evaluates the effectiveness of legislation mandating teen dating violence 

education in schools. 

Amount and length of awards: NIJ anticipates that up to a total of $2.5 million may become 

available for up to eight awards made through this solicitation. All NIJ awards are subject to 

the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or additional requirements 

that may be imposed by law. NIJ expects to make up to eight awards, depending on funds 

available, the number of high-quality applications, and other pertinent factors. NIJ funding for an 

individual research project rarely exceeds $500,000 annually, though total funding for projects 

requiring multiple years to complete has exceeded $1 million in some cases. If feasible, NIJ 

recommends that applicants divide the proposed work into discrete phases, with each phase 

resulting in the delivery of a measurable deliverable. Applicants should try to structure the 

phases so that the funding required in any fiscal year will not exceed $500,000. Although NIJ 

cannot guarantee that subsequent phases, stages, or tasks will be funded, this approach will 

enable NIJ to fund the proposed work incrementally, depending on, among other things, the 

quality of the deliverable at the end of each phase, strategic priorities, and the availability of 

funds. However, applicants should not divide their work if it is not feasible to do so without 

impairing the technical and programmatic soundness of their approach. Note: Deliverables (e.g., 

a final report) will be required at the end of each phase to enable NIJ to assess the progress of 

the work and assist NIJ in making reasoned determinations as to the suitability of funding the 

next phase of the work. The start date for an award made under this solicitation should not be 

earlier than January 1, 2011. 

Applicants should be aware that the total period for an award, including one that receives 

additional funding, ordinarily will not exceed 3 years. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

6
A grant made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 percent of the total cost of 

the project. See "Cofunding" under "What an Application Must Include." 

Evaluation Research: Within applications proposing evaluation research, funding priority will 

be given to experimental research designs that use random selection and assignment of 

participants to experimental and control conditions. When randomized designs are not feasible, 

priority will be given to quasi-experimental designs that include contemporary procedures like 

Propensity Score Matching and Regression Discontinuity Design to address selection bias in 

evaluating outcomes and impacts.

Evaluations that also include measurements of program fidelity and implementation as part of a 

thorough process assessment are desirable. Measurements of program fidelity should be 

included as part of an assessment of program processes and operations to ensure that policies, 

programs, and technologies are implemented as designed. As one aspect of a comprehensive 

evaluation, assessments of program processes should include objective measurements and 

qualitative observations of programs as they are actually implemented and services are 

delivered. These may include assessment of such aspects as adherence to program content 

and protocol, quantity and duration, quality of delivery, and participant responsiveness. 

Proposed evaluation research designs with multiple units of analysis and multiple 

measurements will also be given priority. Design aspects that contribute to the validity of results 

are necessary to effectively address issues of generalizability and representativeness of 

findings. 

Finally, applications that include cost/benefit analysis will be given priority. NIJ views 

cost/benefit analysis as an effective way to communicate and disseminate findings from 

evaluation research. 

Please note: All applicants under this solicitation must comply with Department of Justice 

regulations on confidentiality and human subjects protection. See “Other Requirements for OJP 

Applications” at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/other_requirements.htm. 

What will not be funded:

1. Provision of training or direct service. 

2. Proposals primarily to purchase equipment, materials, or supplies. (Your budget may 

include these items if they are necessary to conduct applied research, development, 

demonstration, evaluation, or analysis.) 

3. Work that will be funded under another specific solicitation. 

Budget Information 

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver: With respect to 

any award of more than $250,000 made under this solicitation, Federal funds may not be used 

to pay total cash compensation (salary plus bonuses) to any employee of the award recipient at 

a rate that exceeds 110% of the maximum annual salary payable to a member of the Federal 

Government’s Senior Executive Service (SES) at an agency with a Certified SES Performance 

Appraisal System for that year. (The 2010 salary table for SES employees is available at 

http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/indexSES.asp.) Note: A recipient may compensate an 

employee at a higher rate, provided the amount in excess of this compensation limitation is paid 

with non-Federal funds. (Any such additional compensation will not be considered matching 

funds where match requirements apply.) 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

7
The limitation on compensation rates allowable under an award may be waived on an individual 

basis at the discretion of the Director of the National Institute of Justice. An applicant that 

wishes to request a waiver must include a detailed justification in the budget narrative of its 

application. Unless the applicant submits a waiver request and justification with the application, 

the applicant should anticipate that OJP will request that the applicant adjust and resubmit its 

budget. 

The justification should include: the particular qualifications and expertise of the individual, the 

uniqueness of the service being provided, the individual’s specific knowledge of the program or 

project being undertaken with award funds, and a statement explaining that the individual’s 

salary is commensurate with the regular and customary rate for an individual with his/her 

qualifications and expertise, and for the work that is to be done. 

Performance Measures 

To assist in fulfilling the Department’s responsibilities under the Government Performance and 

Results Act (GPRA), P.L. 103-62, applicants who receive funding under this solicitation must 

provide data that measure the results of their work. Applicants who receive funding under this 

solicitation are required to provide the data requested in the “Data Grantee Provides” column so 

that OJP can calculate values for the “Performance Measures” column. Performance measures 

for this solicitation are as follows: 

Objective Performance Measure(s) Data Grantee Provides 

Develop and analyze 

information and data 

having clear implications 

for criminal justice policy 

and practice in the United 

States. 

1. Relevance to the needs of the field 

as measured by whether the 

grantee’s substantive scope did not 

deviate from the funded proposal or 

any subsequent agency 

modifications to the scope. 

2. Quality of the research as assessed 

by peer reviewers. 

3. Quality of management as measured 

by whether significant interim project 

milestones were achieved, final 

deadlines were met, and costs 

remained within approved limits. 

4. If applicable, number of NIJ final 

grant reports, NIJ research 

documents, and grantee research 

documents published. 

1. A final report providing a 

comprehensive overview of the project 

and a detailed description of the 

project design, data, and methods; a 

full presentation of scientific findings; 

and a thorough discussion of the 

implications of the project findings for 

criminal justice practice and policy in 

the United States. 

2. Quarterly financial reports, semiannual progress reports, and a final 

progress report. 

3. If applicable, each data set that was 

collected, acquired, or modified in 

conjunction with the project. 

4. If applicable, citation to 

report(s)/document(s).

How to Apply 

Applications will be submitted through OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS). GMS is a 

Web-based, data-driven computer application that provides cradle to grave support for the 

application, award and management of grants at OJP. Applicants should begin the process 

immediately to meet the GMS registration deadline, especially if this is the first time they have 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

8
used the system. Complete instructions on how to register and submit an application in GMS 

can be found at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmscbt/. If you experience technical difficulties at any point 

during this process, please e-mail GMSHelpDesk@usdoj.gov, or call 1–888–549–9901 (option 

3), Monday–Friday from 6:00 a.m. to midnight eastern time, except for Federal holidays. OJP 

highly recommends starting the registration process as early as possible to prevent delays in 

the application submission by the specified deadline. 

All applicants are required to complete the following steps. 

1. Acquire a DUNS Number. A DUNS number is required to submit an application in 

GMS. The Office of Management and Budget requires that all businesses and nonprofit 

applicants for Federal funds include a DUNS (Data Universal Numbering System) 

number in their application for a new award or renewal of an existing award. A DUNS 

number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for 

identifying and keeping track of entities receiving Federal funds. The identifier is used for 

tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for Federal 

assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS number will be used 

throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one-time activity. 

Obtain a DUNS number by calling 1–866–705–5711 or by applying online at 

www.dunandbradstreet.com. Individuals are exempt from this requirement. 

2. Acquire or Renew Registration With the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) 

Database. CCR registration is required to receive funding. OJP requires that all 

applicants (other than individuals) for Federal financial assistance maintain current 

registrations in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. The CCR database 

is the repository for standard information about Federal financial assistance applicants, 

recipients, and subrecipients. Organizations that have previously submitted applications 

via Grants.gov are already registered with CCR, as it is a requirement for Grants.gov 

registration. Please note, however, that applicants must update or renew their CCR 

registration at least once per year to maintain an active status. Information about CCR 

registration procedures can be accessed at www.ccr.gov. 

3. Acquire a GMS Username and Password. If you are a new user, please create a GMS 

profile by selecting the first time user link under the sign-in box of the GMS home page. 

For more information on how to register in GMS, go to www.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmscbt/.

4. Search for the Funding Opportunity on GMS. After you log in to GMS or complete 

your GMS profile for your username and password, go to the Funding Opportunities link 

on the left hand side of the page. Please select “National Institute of Justice” and then 

“NIJ FY 10 ORE Research and Evaluation on Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Teen 

Dating Violence.” 

5. Select the Apply Online Button Associated With the Solicitation Title. The search 

results from step 4 will display the solicitation title along with the Registration and 

Application Deadlines for this funding opportunity. Please select the Apply Online button 

in the Action Column to create an application in the system. 

6. Submit an Application Consistent With This Solicitation by Following the 

Directions in GMS. Once submitted, GMS will display a confirmation screen stating 

your submission was successful. Important: You are urged to submit your application at 

least 72 hours prior to the due date of the application. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 9
Note: OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS) does not accept executable file types as 

application attachments. These disallowed file types include, but are not limited to, the 

following extensions: ".com," ".bat," ".exe," ".vbs," ".cfg," ".dat," ".db," ".dbf," ".dll," ".ini," ".log," 

".ora," ".sys," and ".zip."

Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues 

If you experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond your control which prevent you from 

submitting your application by the deadline, you must contact the NIJ staff member listed on the 

title page within 24 hours after the deadline and request approval to submit your application. 

At that time, NIJ staff will require you to e-mail the complete grant application, your DUNS 

number, and provide a GMS Help Desk tracking number(s). After the program office reviews all 

of the information submitted, and contacts the GMS Helpdesk to validate the technical issues 

you reported, OJP will contact you to either approve or deny your request to submit a late 

application. If the technical issues you reported cannot be validated, your application will be 

rejected as untimely. 

To ensure a fair competition for limited discretionary funds, the following conditions are not valid 

reasons to permit late submissions: (1) failure to begin the registration process in sufficient time; 

(2) failure to follow GMS instructions on how to register and apply as posted on its Web site; (3) 

failure to follow all of the instructions in the OJP solicitation; and (4) technical issues 

experienced with the applicant’s computer or information technology (IT) environment. 

Notifications regarding known technical problems with GMS are posted on the OJP funding Web 

page, www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/solicitations.htm. 

What an Application Must Include 

This section describes what an application is expected to include and sets out a number of 

elements. Applicants should anticipate that failure to submit an application that contains all of 

the specified elements may negatively affect the review of the application and, should a decision 

nevertheless be made to make an award, may result in the inclusion of special conditions that 

preclude access to or use of award funds pending satisfaction of the conditions. 

Moreover, applicants should anticipate that applications that are not responsive to the scope of 

the solicitation, or do not include a program narrative, budget detail worksheet, budget narrative, 

tribal resolution (if applicable), and resumes/curriculum vitae of key personnel will not proceed 

to peer review and will not receive further consideration. 

OJP strongly recommends use of appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., “Program 

Narrative,” “Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative,” “Timelines,” “Memoranda of 

Understanding,” “Resumes”) for all attachments. OJP recommends that resumes be included in 

a single file. 

Standard Form 424 

Please see www07.grants.gov/assets/SF424Instructions.pdf for instructions on how to 

complete your SF424. When selecting "type of applicant," if the applicant is a for-profit 

entity, please select "For-Profit Organization" or "Small Business" (as applicable) in the 

Type of Applicant 1 data field. For-profit applicants also may select additional applicable 

categories (e.g., "Private Institution of Higher Education"). 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

10
 

Program Narrative 

Program Narrative Guidelines: 

a. Title Page (not counted against the 30-page program narrative limit). 

The title page should include the title of the project, submission date, and the 

applicant’s name and complete contact information (i.e., name, address, 

telephone number, and e-mail address).

b. Project Abstract (not counted against the 30-page program narrative limit). 

The 400 to 600-word abstract should state the problem under investigation 

(including research goals and objectives) and the anticipated relevance of the 

project to criminal justice public policy, practice, or theory. It should describe the 

proposed method and/or research design, including data to be used in 

addressing research questions, data collection procedures and instrumentation, 

access to data, and other methods or procedures of the proposed study. It 

should also describe procedures for data analysis and all expected products, 

including interim and final reports, instrumentation, and devices. If applicable, it 

should describe the subjects who will be involved in the proposed project, 

including the number of participants; participants’ age, gender, and race/ethnicity; 

and other pertinent characteristics, such as methods used to gain access to 

subjects. 

c. Resubmit Response (if applicable). If an applicant is resubmitting a proposal 

that was presented previously to NIJ, but not funded, the applicant must indicate 

this. A two-page document addressing the previous consensus review must be 

provided that covers the following: (1) the title, submission date, and NIJassigned application number of the previous proposal, and (2) a brief summary of 

responses to the peer review and/or revisions to the proposal. This document 

should be inserted after the abstract. This document will not be counted against 

the 30-page program narrative limit. 

d. Table of Contents and Figures (not counted against the 30-page program 

narrative limit). 

e. Main body. The main body of the Program Narrative should describe the project 

in depth and include the following sections: 

• Purpose, goals, and objectives. 

• Review of relevant literature. 

• Detailed description of research design and methods to include: 

research questions, hypotheses, description of sample, analysis plan, 

etc. 

• Research independence and integrity (see “Selection Criteria,” 

below). 

• Implications for criminal justice policy and practice in the United 

States. 

• Management plan and organization. 

• Dissemination strategy. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

11
The program narrative section of your application must not exceed 30 doublespaced pages in 12-point font with 1-inch margins. Abstract, table of contents, 

charts, figures, appendices, and government forms do not count toward the 30-

page limit for the narrative section. 

Applicants should anticipate that if the program narrative fails to comply with 

these length-related restrictions, such that it provides a significant competitive 

advantage, the failure to comply may be considered in peer review and in final 

award decisions. 

f. Appendices (not counted against program narrative page limit) include: 

• Bibliography/references. 

• Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps 

pertaining to the proposed study. 

• Curriculum vitae, resumes or biographical sketches of all key 

personnel. 

• Project timeline and research calendar with expected milestones. 

• Human Subjects Protection Paperwork including Institutional Review 

Board (IRB) documentation and forms (see 

http://www.ojp.gov/nij/funding/humansubjects/human-subjects.htm). 

• Privacy Certificate (for further guidance go to 

http://www.ojp.gov/nij/funding/humansubjects/privacy-certificateguidance.htm). 

• List of previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigator(s). 

• Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from 

organizations collaborating in the project, such as law enforcement 

and correctional agencies (if applicable). 

• List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which you 

have submitted this proposal (if applicable). 

• Other materials specified by the solicitation. 

• Data Archiving Strategy (see descriptive paragraph below).

Data Archiving Strategy: NIJ requires that each data set resulting from funded 

research be submitted as a grant product or deliverable for archiving with the 

National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. (Data sets are to be submitted 90 days 

before the end of the project period.) Applications for NIJ research grants must 

include a brief (one- or two-page) data archiving strategy. For purposes of 

research replication and extension, the inclusion of only the final data set often 

prevents other researchers from replicating or extending the study because there 

are no original data, intermediate data, or documentation detailing how the data 

changed throughout the project. This data archiving strategy therefore must 

briefly describe the— 

• Anticipated manipulations of original, intermediate, and final data sets (as 

applicable). 

• Methods of documentation of such manipulations. 

• Preparation of original, intermediate, and final data sets for archive 

submission. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

12
The data archiving strategy should be submitted as an appendix to the 

application and will not count toward the 30-page limit. Please label this appendix 

“Data Archiving Strategy.” 

Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative 

a. Budget Detail Worksheet

A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found at 

www.ojp.gov/funding/forms/budget_detail.pdf. If the budget is submitted in a different 

format, the budget categories listed in the sample budget worksheet must be 

included. 

For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs, 

please see the OJP Financial Guide at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm. 

b. Budget Narrative 

The Budget Narrative should thoroughly and clearly describe every category of 

expense listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. The narrative should be 

mathematically sound and correspond with the information and figures provided in 

the Budget Detail Worksheet. The narrative should explain how all costs were 

estimated and calculated and how they are relevant to the completion of the 

proposed project. The narrative may include tables for clarification purposes and can 

be provided in a Microsoft Office Word document. As with the Budget Detail 

Worksheet, the Budget Narrative must be broken down by year. 

Cofunding: A grant made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 

percent of the total cost of the project. You must indicate whether you believe it is 

feasible for you to contribute cash, facilities, or services as non-Federal support for the 

project. Your application should identify generally any such contributions that you expect 

to make and your proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, will be 

supported with non-Federal contributions. 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable)

Applicants that do not have a federally negotiated indirect cost rate and wish to establish 

one can submit a proposal to their “cognizant” Federal agency. Generally, the cognizant 

Federal agency is the agency that provides the preponderance of direct Federal funding. 

This can be determined by reviewing an organization’s schedule of Federal financial 

assistance. If DOJ is your cognizant Federal agency, obtain information needed to 

submit an indirect cost rate proposal at 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/part3/part3chap17.htm.

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable)

If an application is being submitted by either (1) a tribe or tribal organization, or (2) by a 

third party proposing to provide direct services or assistance to residents on tribal lands, 

then a current authorizing resolution of the governing body of the tribal entity or other 

enactment of the tribal council or comparable governing body authorizing the inclusion of 

the tribe or tribal organization and its residents must be included with the application. In 

those instances when an organization or consortium of tribes proposes to apply for a 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

13
grant on behalf of a tribe or multiple specific tribes, then the application must include a 

resolution from all tribes that will be included as a part of the services/assistance 

provided under the grant. 

Other Standard Forms 

Additional forms that may be required in connection with an award are available on 

OJP’s funding page at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/forms.htm. Please note in 

particular the following forms. 

1. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other 

Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (required of all 

applicants as part of the GMS application process) 

2. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (required for any applicant that expends any 

funds for lobbying activities) 

3. Accounting System and Financial Capability Questionnaire (required for any 

applicant that is a nongovernmental entity and that has not received any award 

from OJP within the past 3 years) 

4. Standard Assurances (required of all applicants as part of the GMS application 

process) 

Note: Attachments to the application should be included in one of the following four 

categories: 1) Program Narrative; 2) Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative; 

3) Appendices; and 4) Other. 

Selection Criteria 

Statement of the Problem (Understanding of the problem and its importance)—15%

1. Clarity of problem statement and its importance to the field of study. 

2. Demonstrated connection between problem and proposed research. 

3. Awareness of the state of current research and/or technology. 

4. Identification of gaps in existing research. 

5. Demonstrated understanding of the population under investigation. 

6. Connection to NIJ priorities/responsiveness to solicitation. 

Project Design and Implementation (Quality and technical merit)—30%

1. Detailed and complete discussion of proposed research methods. 

2. Explanation for research method approach and why it was selected over others. 

3. Detailed and complete discussion of analytic techniques. 

4. Identification of appropriate approach to answer proposed research questions. 

5. Awareness of human subjects’ matters. 

6. Overall feasibility of proposed project. 

7. Innovation and creativity. 

Capabilities/Competencies (Capabilities, demonstrated productivity, and experience of 

applicants)—20%

1. Qualifications and experience of proposed staff. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

14
 2. Demonstrated ability of proposed staff and organization to manage the effort. 

 3. Adequacy of the plan to manage the project, including how various tasks are subdivided 

and resources are used. 

 4. Successful past performance on NIJ grants and contracts (when applicable). 

Budget—15% 

1. Total cost of the project relative to the perceived benefit. 

 2. Appropriateness of the budget relative to the level of effort. 

 3. Use of existing resources to conserve costs. 

Impact/Outcomes and Evaluation (Relevance to policy and practice)—15% 

1. Potential for significant advances in scientific or technical understanding of the problem. 

2. Potential for significant advances in the field. 

3. Relevance for improving the policy and practice of criminal justice and related agencies 

in the United States and improving public safety, security, and quality of life. 

4. Affordability and cost-effectiveness of proposed end products, when applicable (e.g., 

purchase price and maintenance costs for a new technology or cost of training to use the 

technology). 

5. Perceived potential for commercialization and/or implementation of a new technology 

(when applicable). 

Relevance of the project for policy and practice in the United States

Higher quality applications clearly explain the practical implications of the project. They 

connect technical expertise with criminal justice policy and practice. To ensure that the 

project has strong relevance for policy and practice, some researchers and technologists 

collaborate with practitioners and policymakers. You may include letters showing support 

from practitioners, but they carry less weight than clear evidence that you understand why 

policymakers and practitioners would benefit from your work and how they would use it. 

While a partnership may affect State or local activities, it should also have broader 

implications for others across the country. 

Dissemination Strategy—5% 

1. Well-defined plan for the grant recipient to disseminate results to appropriate audiences, 

including researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. 

2. Creative strategy for dissemination of results that goes beyond conference presentations 

and journal articles. 

3. Suggestions for print and electronic products NIJ might develop for practitioners and 

policymakers.

Research Independence and Integrity 

Regardless of a proposal’s rating under the criteria outlined above, in order to receive funds, the 

applicant’s proposal must demonstrate research independence, including appropriate 

safeguards to ensure research objectivity and integrity. 

Considerations in evaluating research independence and integrity will include, but may not be 

limited to, the adequacy of the applicant’s efforts to identify factors that could affect the 

objectivity/integrity of the proposed staff and/or the organization in carrying out the research, 

development, or evaluation activity; and the adequacy of the applicant’s existing or proposed 

remedies to control any such factors. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

15
Review Process 

OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. NIJ reviews the 

application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, 

measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with the solicitation. 

Peer reviewers will be reviewing the applications submitted under this solicitation that meet 

basic minimum requirements. NIJ may use either internal peer reviewers, external peer 

reviewers, or a combination to review the applications under this solicitation. An external peer 

reviewer is an expert in the field of the subject matter of a given solicitation who is NOT a 

current U.S. Department of Justice employee. An internal reviewer is a current U.S. Department 

of Justice employee who is well-versed or has expertise in the subject matter of this solicitation. 

Eligible applications will be evaluated, scored, and rated by a peer review panel. Peer 

reviewers’ ratings and any resulting recommendations are advisory only. In addition to peer 

review ratings, considerations for award recommendations and decisions may include, but are 

not limited to, underserved populations, geographic diversity, strategic priorities, past 

performance, and available funding. 

The Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO), in consultation with NIJ, conducts a financial 

review of applications for potential discretionary awards and cooperative agreements to 

evaluate the fiscal integrity and financial capability of applicants; examines proposed costs to 

determine if the budget and budget narrative accurately explain project costs; and determines 

whether costs are reasonable, necessary, and allowable under applicable Federal cost 

principles and agency regulations. 

All final award decisions will be made by the Director of the National Institute of Justice, who 

also may give consideration to factors including, but not limited to, underserved populations, 

geographic diversity, strategic priorities, past performance, and available funding when making 

awards. 

Additional Requirements 

Applicants selected for awards must agree to comply with additional legal requirements upon 

acceptance of an award. We strongly encourage you to review the information pertaining to 

these additional requirements prior to submitting your application. Additional information for 

each can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/funding/other_requirements.htm. 

• Civil Rights Compliance 

• Faith-Based and Other Community Organizations 

• Confidentiality and Human Subjects Protection (if applicable) 

• Anti-Lobbying Act 

• Financial and Government Audit Requirements 

• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (if applicable) 

• DOJ Information Technology Standards (if applicable) 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

16
• Single Point of Contact Review 

• Nonsupplanting of State or Local Funds 

• Criminal Penalty for False Statements 

• Compliance with Office of Justice Programs Financial Guide

• Suspension or Termination of Funding 

• Nonprofit Organizations 

• For-Profit Organizations 

• Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) 

• Rights in Intellectual Property 

• Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006 

• Awards in excess of $5,000,000 – Federal taxes certification requirement 

If your proposal is funded, you will be required to submit several reports and other materials, 

including: 

Final substantive report: The final report should be a comprehensive overview of the project 

and should include a detailed description of the project design, data, and methods; a full 

presentation of scientific findings; a thorough discussion of the implications of the project 

findings for criminal justice practice and policy in the United States; etc. It must contain an 

abstract of no more than 600 words and an executive summary of 2,500 to 4,000 words. 

A draft of the final report, abstract, and executive summary must be submitted 90 days before 

the end date of the grant. The draft final report will be peer reviewed upon submission. The 

reviews will be forwarded to the principal investigator with suggestions for revisions. The author 

must then submit the revised final report, abstract, and executive summary by the end date of 

the grant. The abstract, executive summary, and final report must be submitted in both paper 

and electronic formats. 

For program evaluation studies, the final report should include a section on measuring program 

performance. This section should outline the measures used to evaluate program effectiveness, 

modifications made to those measures as a result of the evaluation, and recommendations 

regarding these and other potential performance measures for similar programs. (This 

information will be particularly valuable to NIJ and other Federal program agencies in 

implementing performance measures for federally funded criminal justice programs.) 

Interim reports: Grantees must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual progress 

reports, a final progress report, and, if applicable, an annual audit report in accordance with 

Office of Management and Budget Circular A–133. Future awards and fund drawdowns may be 

withheld if reports are delinquent. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

17
Data sets: NIJ requires submission of all data sets (original, intermediate, and final) produced 

or collected for the funded project, and any artifact associated with the project data. Included 

with the final sets of data should be the plan outlined in the Data Archiving Strategy section of 

the proposal. 

OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 

18
OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires 02/28/2013 19

Application Checklist 

Research and Evaluation on Sexual Violence, Stalking, 

and Teen Dating Violence 

The application checklist has been created to aid you in developing your application. 

Eligibility: 

_____ Tribal authorizing resolution (if applicable) 

Application Components: 

_____ Program Narrative (see pages 11–12 and “Selection Criteria,” pages 14–15) 

_____ Appendices to the Program Narrative 

_____ Bibliography/references 

_____ Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps 

pertaining to the proposed study 

_____ Curriculum vitae, resumes or biographical sketches of all key personnel 

_____ Project timeline and research calendar with expected milestones 

_____ Human Subjects Protection Paperwork 

_____ Privacy Certificate 

_____ List of previous and current NIJ awards to applicant organization and 

investigators 

_____ Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from 

organizations collaborating in the project (if applicable) 

_____ List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which you 

have submitted this proposal (if applicable) 

_____ Data Archiving Strategy 

_____ Budget Narrative 

_____ Budget Detail Worksheet 

_____ Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 

Program Narrative/Abstract Format:

_____ Double-spaced 

_____ 12-point standard font 

_____ 1” standard margins 

_____ Narrative is 30 pages or less 

Other: 

_____ Standard Form 424 

_____ DUNS number 

_____ Other standard forms as applicable (see page 14), including 

_____ Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (if applicable) 

_____ Accounting System and Financial Capability Questionnaire (if applicable)