alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company,
serving as its Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: May 8, 2008                               /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Principal Financial Officer)




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth
Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6957 

To expand opportunities for employment of recent graduates in Federal 

Government positions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2022 

Mr. KIM of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To expand opportunities for employment of recent graduates 

in Federal Government positions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be called the ‘‘Pipeline to Service Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR FEDERAL EM6 PLOYMENT. 

7 (a) OPM PROGRAM TO RECRUIT STUDENTS FOR

8 FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6957 IH

1 the Office of Personnel Management shall establish 

2 a program under which the Office enters into part3 nerships with institutions of higher education (as de4 fined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 

5 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to recruit and hire students 

6 to positions in the Federal Government. 

7 (2) CONTENTS.—The program established 

8 under subsection (a) shall be in such form and man9 ner as the Director may prescribe, but at a min10 imum shall— 

11 (A) advise students on courses of study; 

12 (B) provide professional development work13 shops to students; 

14 (C) assist students in searching for Fed15 eral jobs on the website USAJobs.gov. 

16 (D) provide students training on preparing 

17 resumes for applying to Federal positions; 

18 (E) make an effort to recruit students 

19 from communities that are historically under20 represented in Federal employment; and 

21 (F) provide students training on how to be 

22 competitive when applying for Federal intern23 ships and the Pathways Program. 

24 (b) INCREASE IN PRESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT FEL25 LOWS PROGRAM POSITIONS.—During each of fiscal years 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6957 IH

1 2022 through 2027, the Presidential Management Fellows 

2 Program carried out by the Office of Personnel Manage3 ment shall have a total number of Program positions at 

4 executive agencies equal to 200 percent of the number of 

5 such positions established on the date of enactment of this 

6 Act. 

7 (c) INTERN HOURLY PAY RATE.—Any individual 

8 who is an intern in the Federal Government, including any 

9 intern in a Federal internship program described under 

10 section 3111a of title 5, United States Code, shall be paid 

11 a stipend of $15 for each hour that the individual is work12 ing as an intern. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7037

HUGH EPPS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

MICHAEL MOORE, Government Attorney, Eastern District Court 

of VA; UNKNOWN, DEA Officer; JAMES OXFORD, DEA Officer, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate 

Judge. (3:09-cv-00039-JRS) 

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Hugh Epps, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Hugh Epps seeks to appeal a magistrate judge’s order 

denying without prejudice his “Motion of Filing a Complaint 

under Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. § 1983.” This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Epps seeks to 

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory 

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Torres, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, his admissions during the plea colloquy did not raise the possibility of an agency defense, thereby triggering the need for further inquiry by the court. On this record, we are unable to evaluate defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. In the circumstances presented, defendant’s contention may appropriately be raised in a proceeding under CPL article 440. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2114

DEBORAH S. LINZER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of 

Health and Human Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:07-cv-00597-AW)

Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryan A. Chapman, LAW OFFICE OF BRYAN A. CHAPMAN, Washington, 

D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, 

Jason D. Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Deborah S. Linzer appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment in favor of Sebelius on Linzer’s 

Rehabilitation Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Linzer v. Sebelius, No. 

8:07-cv-00597-AW (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
* * * * *

ACTION: Notice of Virtual Public Forum for EAC Board of Advisors.

Date and Time: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 9 a.m. EDT through Monday, 
September 15, 2008, 5 p.m. EDT.

Place: EAC Board of Advisors Virtual Meeting Room at http://www.eac.gov. Once at the main page of EAC's Web site, viewers should 
click the link to the Board of Advisors Virtual Meeting Room. The 
virtual meeting room will open on Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 9 
a.m. EDT and will close on Monday, September 15, 2008, at 5 p.m. EDT. 
The site will be available 24 hours per day during that 5-day period.

Purpose: The EAC Board of Advisors will review and provide comment on a 
draft of the independent evaluation plan. The draft contains a plan for 
evaluating the EAC's $10M Election Data Collection Grant Program.
    The EAC Board of Advisors Virtual Meeting Room was established to 
enable the Board of Advisors to conduct business in an efficient manner 
in a public forum, including being able to review and discuss draft 
documents, when it is not feasible for an in-person board meeting. The 
Board of Advisors will not take any votes or propose any resolutions 
during the 5-day forum of September 11-September 15, 2008. Members will 
post comments about the draft evaluation plan.
    This activity is open to the public. The public may view the 
Proceedings of this special forum by visiting the EAC Board of Advisors 
virtual meeting room at http://www.eac.gov. At any time between 
Thursday, September 11, 2008, 9 a.m. EDT and Monday, September 15, 
2008, 5 p.m. EDT. The public may file written statements to the EAC 
Board of Advisors at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33515c5241575c555257455a405c4140735652501d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8bab7b9aabcb7beb9bcaeb1abb7aaab98bdb9bbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>. Data on EAC's Web site is 
accessible to visitors with disabilities and meets the requirements of 
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.
* * * * *

Alice Miller,
Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
 [FR Doc. E8-19855 Filed 8-22-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7045 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7045

   To eliminate the opt-out for nonfederal governmental health plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

  Ms. Porter (for herself and Mrs. Dingell) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To eliminate the opt-out for nonfederal governmental health plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Closing Health Coverage Gaps for 
Public Servants Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE OPT-OUT FOR NONFEDERAL GOVERNMENTAL HEALTH 
              PLANS.

    Section 2722(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300gg-21(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Sunset of election option.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding the 
                        preceding provisions of this paragraph--
                                    ``(I) no election described in 
                                subparagraph (A) may be made on or 
                                after the date of enactment of this 
                                subparagraph; and
                                    ``(II) except as provided in clause 
                                (ii), no such election expiring on or 
                                after the date that is 180 days after 
                                the date of such enactment may be 
                                renewed.
                            ``(ii) Exception for certain collectively 
                        bargained plans.--Notwithstanding clause 
                        (i)(II), a plan described in subparagraph 
                        (B)(ii) that is subject to multiple agreements 
                        described in such subparagraph of varying 
                        lengths and that has an election in effect 
                        under subparagraph (A) as of the date of 
                        enactment of this subparagraph that expires on 
                        or after the date that is 180 days after the 
                        date of such enactment may extend such election 
                        until the date on which the term of the last 
                        such agreement expires.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
Address:   One Tower Square
           Hartford, Connecticut 06183

Form 13F File Number:              28-5774

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Marla Berman Lewitus
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7338

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Marla Berman Lewitus          New York, New York      August 16, 1999
------------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6764

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY L. JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:08-cr-00247-GRA-1; 8:14-cv-01803-GRA)

Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry L. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0101 

_____________________________

PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL 

DISTRICT and SEDGWICK CMS,

INC.,

Appellants,

v.

FRANCES SMITH,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Office of the Judges of 

Compensation Claims.

Barbara Case, Judge.

Date of Accident: June 29, 2017.

April 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Samuel B. Spinner and Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, 

Hollywood, and Yunia DeMicco-Nadler of DeMicco-Nadler, LLC, 

Boca Raton, for Appellants.

Thomas Warren Sculco and Shannon McLin of Florida Appeals, 

Orlando, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Shunsky, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 16, 2004

                                                     /s/ Vincent Shunsky
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Vincent Shunsky
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6461

LEE WESLEY HOGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-42-1) Submitted: August 29, 2005 Decided: September 16, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Wesley Hogan, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Robert David Goldberg, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We note that as to Claim O, Hogan’s failure to specifically object to the magistrate judge’s recommended disposition waives appellate review as to that claim. See, e.g. , Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co. , 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Lee Wesley Hogan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hogan has not made the requisite showing. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.- 3 - DISMISSED