alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEE-2014 Q1-Exhibit 10.2


Exhibit 10.2




FORMULA FOR DETERMINING 2014 TARGET PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT
AWARDS TO BE ISSUED TO NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The target number of performance share units to be issued to each Named Executive Officer listed below for 2014 will be determined in accordance with the following formula:


	
					
	2014 Target Number PSU Awards
	=
	Base Salary 
as of 1/1/14
	x
	Long‐Term Incentive Target listed below

	Average closing price of Ameren Corporation Common Stock on The New York Stock Exchange for each trading day in December 2013








	
		
	NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	LONG-TERM INCENTIVE 
TARGET AS PERCENT OF BASE SALARY

	Voss
	325%

	Lyons
	175%

	Baxter
	175%

	Sullivan
	N/A1

	Naslund
	150%

	Nelson
	160%







_______________________________________ 
1  Mr. Sullivan’s employment with the Company terminated as of December 2, 2013 and, accordingly, he did not receive a 2014 PSUP award.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         2,017,906
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,198,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    33,344,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               41,322,579
<PP&E>                                         7,094,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,906,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,106,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,742,175
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          202,539
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,998,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,106,745
<SALES>                                        50,658,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               57,754,310
<CGS>                                          33,571,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  54,106,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             436,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,358,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,276,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,082,390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .20
        

</TABLE>
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS 

### TERENCE WESTLEY NO. 

### 2021 Kw 1336 FEBRUARY 14, 2022 In Re: Terence 

## Westley, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial 

### District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 09- 16- 0433. BEFORE: 

### MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The district court is ordered to proceed toward 

### disposition of relator' s application for postconviction relief, 

### filed March 9, 2021, 

## if it has not alreadydone so. PMC JEW MRT



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY 

### LERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Ellis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered October 12, 1988, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The contentions of the defendant on this appeal were not *612raised in the defendant’s application to withdraw his plea and hence are not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). In any event, it was not improper for the court to inform the defendant of the maximum legal sentence that could be imposed if the defendant proceeded to trial and was found guilty *(see, People v Provosty,*141 AD2d 867, 868). The defendant’s other contentions are similarly without merit *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6891 

AN ACT 

To exclude government officials of the Russian Federation 

from certain international meetings, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6891 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Isolate Russian Gov3 ernment Officials Act of 2022’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF THE 

5 RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

6 (a) POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES.—It is the pol7 icy of the United States to seek to exclude government 

8 officials of the Russian Federation, to the maximum ex9 tent practicable, from participation in meetings, pro10 ceedings, and other activities of the following organiza11 tions: 

12 (1) Group of 20. 

13 (2) Bank for International Settlements. 

14 (3) Basel Committee for Banking Standards. 

15 (4) Financial Stability Board. 

16 (5) International Association of Insurance Su17 pervisors. 

18 (6) International Organization of Securities 

19 Commissions. 

20 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of the Treas21 ury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sys22 tem, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as the 

23 case may be, shall take all necessary steps to advance the 

24 policy set forth in subsection (a). 

25 (c) TERMINATION.—This section shall have no force 

26 or effect on the earlier of— 
3 

•HR 6891 EH

1 (1) the date that is 5 years after the date of en2 actment of this Act; or 

3 (2) 30 days after the date that the President 

4 reports to Congress that the government of the Rus5 sian Federation has ceased its destabilizing activities 

6 with respect to the sovereignty and territorial integ7 rity of Ukraine. 

8 (d) WAIVER.—The President may waive the applica9 tion of this section if the President reports to the Congress 

10 that the waiver is in the national interest of the United 

11 States and includes an explanation of the reasons therefor. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6891 

AN ACT 

To exclude government officials of the Russian 

and for other purposes. Federation from certain international meetings,
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6828 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6828

     To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the HHS Reproductive 
                     Healthcare Access Task Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2022

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Lamborn, 
  Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Ellzey, Mrs. Miller of 
   Illinois, Ms. Herrell, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. McKinley, Mr. 
 Smucker, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Long, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. 
   Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. 
   Cawthorn, Mr. Perry, Mr. Babin, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Rodney Davis of 
  Illinois, Mr. Gibbs, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Joyce of 
  Pennsylvania, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Mast, and Mr. Norman) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the HHS Reproductive 
                     Healthcare Access Task Force.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Pro-Abortion Task Force Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR HHS REPRODUCTIVE 
              HEALTHCARE ACCESS TASK FORCE.

    No Federal funds may be used for--
            (1) the HHS Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force, 
        announced by the Secretary of Health and Human Services on 
        January 21, 2022; or
            (2) any successor or substantially similar task force.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.20(c)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 OF

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT


 


This AGREEMENT
made effective as of the 31st day of December 2004, between
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and
Patrick J. Moore (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH that


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive entered into a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement dated
effective January 4, 2002, as amended by an Amendment dated June 1, 2004 (the “RSU
Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive now consider it desirable to enter into this
Amendment No. 2 of the RSU Agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the continued employment of the Executive by the Company
and the benefits to be derived by the Executive hereunder, and of the Executive’s
agreement to continued employment by the Company, the parties mutually agree to
amend the RSU Agreement as follows, effective December 31, 2004:


 


1.                                       Section
5 (a) of the RSU Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


(a)                                  Subject
to paragraphs (b) and (c) below, the Restricted Stock Units awarded to the
Executive will vest according to the following schedule:


 


	
  Number of Vested

  Restricted Stock Units

  	
   

  	
  Vesting Date

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  25,000

  	
   

  	
  December 31,
  2004

  	
   

  
	
  25,000

  	
   

  	
  January 4,
  2006

  	
   

  
	
  25,000

  	
   

  	
  January 4,
  2007

  	
   

  



 


2.                                       Sections
6 (a), 6 (d) and 6 (e) of the RSU Agreement shall be amended to delete the
words “a single cash sum” and substitute the words “shares of Common Stock”.


 


3.                                       The
second sentence of Section 6 (b) of the RSU Agreement shall be amended to read
in its entirety as follows:


 





















 


The value of
any vested Restricted Stock Units subject to the Executive’s timely deferral
election will be allocated to an account maintained on his behalf under the SSCC
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A, or any
successor thereto.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Agreement effective as of the date first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
     /s/ Patrick
  J. Moore

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Craig A. Hunt

  	
   

  
	
   Patrick J. Moore

  	
   

  	
  Craig A. Hunt

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Vice President and Secretary

  
					



 


2
Exhibit 23




                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Citizens Communications Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (No.
33-52873) on Form S-3, in the Registration Statement (No. 33-63615) on Form S-3,
in the Registration  Statement (No.  333-58044) on Form S-3, in the Registration
Statement  (No.  333-61432)  on Form S-8,  in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-71821) on Form S-8, in the  Registration  Statement (No.  333-71597) on Form
S-8,  in  the  Registration  Statement  (No.  333-71029)  on  Form  S-8,  in the
Registration Statement (No. 33-42972) on Form S-8, in the Registration Statement
(No. 33-48683) on Form S-8, and in the Registration Statement (No. 333-69740) on
Form S-4 of Citizens Communications Company and subsidiaries of our report dated
March 6, 2002,  with  respect to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Citizens
Communications Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
related  consolidated   statements  of  income  (loss),   shareholders'  equity,
comprehensive  income  (loss)  and  cash  flows  for  each of the  years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the financial statement schedule,
which  report  appears in the  December  31, 2001 annual  report on Form 10-K of
Citizens Communications Company and subsidiaries.


                                                       /s/KPMG LLP


New York, New York
March 6, 2002
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

THOMAS F. NEENAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-5147

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:11-cv-00733-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. 

Bruggink.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

WALLACE L. TAYLOR, Law Offices of Wallace L. Taylor, 

of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

BARBARA E. THOMAS, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department 

of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, 

Assistant Attorney General, BRYANT G. SNEE, Acting 

Director, and STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM, Assistant Director.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 28, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                          57,900
<SECURITIES>                                     8,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                  574,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (26,400)
<INVENTORY>                                    568,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,419,900
<PP&E>                                       1,986,800
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,337,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,230,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          714,300
<BONDS>                                        496,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     653,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,230,100
<SALES>                                      1,538,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,538,800
<CGS>                                          842,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,404,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             76,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
        

</TABLE>
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
 September 30,
    
    
    December 31,2006
    
    
    2005Short-term debt
    
    $
    63.0
    
    
    
    14.3Current portion of long-term debt
    
    
    62.2
    
    
    
    2.5Long-term debt
    
    
    796.4
    
    
    
    677.7Total debt
    
    
    921.6
    
    
    
    694.5Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    1,427.3
    
    
    
    915.9Shareholders equity
    
    
    6,483.9
    
    
    
    5,601.6Total capitalization
    
    $
    8,832.8
    
    
    
    7,212.0Ratio of total debt to total capitalization
    
    
    10.4
    %
    
    
    9.6
    %
First Amendment to the AK Steel Holdings Corporation Stock Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.27 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AK STEEL HOLDING CORPORATION 
 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 (as previously amended and restated effective as of January 16, 2003) 
  
 Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved to the Board of Directors of AK Steel Holding Corporation in Section 10.1 of the
AK Steel Holding Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective as of January 16, 2003) (the “Plan”), Section 7.7 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows, effective as of the date of adoption of this
First Amendment: 
  
 “7.7 Awards to
Directors.    Except as otherwise determined by majority vote of the Board with respect to any calendar year, fifty percent (50%) of each Director’s annual retainer fee for services on the Board shall be paid in the form
of Restricted Stock Awards. Each Director may elect to have more than fifty percent (50%) of his or her annual retainer, and/or all or any portion of any other fees to be earned in the calendar year for his or her services on the Board, paid to him
or her in the form of Restricted Stock Awards. Such election and the payment of the Restricted Stock Awards shall be made at such intervals during the calendar year as the Company determines to be administratively feasible according to procedures
established by the Company and approved by the Committee.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AK Steel Holding Corporation has caused this First Amendment to be executed this 15th day of April, 2004. 
  

			
	 AK STEEL HOLDING CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	 
		
	Title:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


The Board of Directors
Polaroid Corporation


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:      Registration Statements No. 33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on
         Form S-3, No. 33-51173 on Form S-8, No. 333-32283 on Form S-8,
         No. 333-32285 on Form S-8, No. 333-67647 on Form S-3 and No. 333-96051
         on Form S-3 of Polaroid Corporation

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 13, 2000, related to
our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 ("the Act"), such
report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified
by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
November 13, 2000
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene Ray WADE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7350.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Eugene Ray Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Ray Wade seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Wade has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Wade,*Nos. CR-99-328; CA-01-960-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Filed pursuant to
                                                                 Rule 424(b) (2)
                                                      Registration No. 333-68949


                                 $3,900,000,000
                                 CITIGROUP INC.
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series A
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series A
                 Due Nine Months or More From the Date of Issue

               Pricing Supplement No. 00001, dated March 23, 2000
                  (To Prospectus Supplement, dated May 6, 1999,
                      to Prospectus, dated March 8, 1999).

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES
                              --------------------

         The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement
and modify, to the extent applicable, the description of general terms and
provisions of Citigroup Inc.'s Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series A set forth in
the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. Capitalized terms not
defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:
-----------------

Title of Notes:                    Citigroup Inc. Medium-Term Senior Notes,
                                   Series A

CUSIP No.                          17306E AA 2

Aggregate Principal Amount:        $1,500,000,000.00

Issue Price:                       99.98%

Proceeds to Citigroup on
  initial issuance:                $1,499,700,000.00

Issue Date:                        3/28/00

Stated Maturity Date:              4/4/01

Type of Interest on Note:          Floating Rate

Base Rate:                         LIBOR Telerate

Computation of Interest:           Actual over 360

Index Maturity:                    1 month

Interest Reset Date:               Interest payment date

Rate Determination Date:           2 London banking days prior to the Interest
                                   Reset Date

Spread (+/-)                       -4 bps

Initial Interest Rate:             Linear interpolation between 1 month Base
                                   Rate and 2 month Base Rate -4 bps

Interest Payment Dates:            Monthly, on the 4th of each month other than
                                   April 2000

First Interest Payment Date:       May 4, 2000

Record Dates:                      15 calendar days immediately  preceding an
                                   Interest Payment Date

Optional Redemption:               No

Salomon Smith Barney Inc.'s
  capacity on original issuance:   Principal

Commission or Discount:            $300,000.00


Salomon Smith Barney Inc. has purchased the Notes as principal in this
transaction for resale to one or more investors or other purchasers at varying
prices related to prevailing market conditions at the time or times of resale as
determined by Salomon Smith Barney Inc.