EXHIBIT 34.3







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc.:

We have examined CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc. (the Company)s compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all publicly issued asset-backed securities transactions involving equipment loan and lease receivables originated by or acquired through the Company, which asset-backed securities transactions were issued on or after  January 1, 2006 for which the Company acted as subservicer (the Platform) described in
the accompanying Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB as of December 31, 2006, and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform. As described in management's assertion, for servicing 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company
has determined that these vendors are not considered "servicers" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as
permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (Interpretation 17.06) . As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and
procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's determination of its eligibility to use Interpretation 17.06. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

---



EXHIBIT 34.3

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with the servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Regulation AB applicable to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2006. Reconciling items in reconciliations for certain asset-backed securities related bank clearing accounts were not resolved within 90 calendar days of  their original identification, or such other number of days
specified in the transaction agreements, as required by Item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(D) of Regulation AB.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance
described in the preceding paragraph, CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc.
complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2006 for all publicly issued asset-backed securities
transactions involving equipment loan and lease receivables originated by or
acquired through the Company which such asset-backed securities transactions
were issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company acted as subservicer,
in all material respects.







(2)

---