alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Westway Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 of our report dated March 9, 2009, with respect to the audit of the balance sheets of Shermen WSC AcquisitionCorp. as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and stockholders’ equity from December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2008. We alsoconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-164289) and related Prospectus of Westway Group, Inc. (formerly Shermen WSC Acquisition Corp.) of our said report dated March 9, 2009 included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Westway Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C.

Roseland, NJ 

March 16, 2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2017

No. 04-17-00663-CV

IN RE Brandy Kara KRATZER

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On October 11, 2017, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered the petition and the response and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). In addition, Relator’s motion for temporary relief filed on November 13, 2017 is denied.

It is so ORDERED on December 6, 2017.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12-2153-CV, styled In the Interest of C.A.S and T.A.S., pending in the 

25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Robin V. Dwyer presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONAL
PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1998
<CASH>                                          94,578
<SECURITIES>                                   127,734
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,283
<PP&E>                                          20,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,441
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,077
<SALES>                                         18,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,965
<CGS>                                           14,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                       349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,810
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        


</TABLE>
PROJCS["Lincoln Projection",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",164041.666667],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",-96.688056],PARAMETER["Scale_Factor",1.000054615],PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",40.25],UNIT["Foot",0.3048]]
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 172 (Thursday, September 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement


Agency Information Collection Activities: Revision of a Currently 
Approved Information Collection

ACTION: Revision of Currently Approved Information Collection; Form I-
901, Fee Remittance for Certain F, J and M Non-immigrants; OMB No. 
1653-0034.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement (USICE), has previously submitted the above 
referenced information collection request for review and clearance in 
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Certain fees 
related to this information collection have been changed. This document 
contains revisions to certain portions of the form that were previously 
published that are related to those fee changes.

Revision

    <bullet> On Page 2 of the Instructions, Item 18B is revised as 
follows: Expedited Delivery: There will be an added shipping and 
handling fee of $35.00 for this option. Your receipt will be delivered 
in an expedited manner to the address listed in item numbers 4-8 on the 
Form I-901.

    Dated: August 27, 2008.
Lee Shirkey,
Chief, Records Management Branch Chief, United States Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security.
 [FR Doc. E8-20455 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-28-P
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 26, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
Trust, Series 2006-ASL1

Per Section 4.15a of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 5/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, has
     been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.



Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                             59
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                    9150
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 9209
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   9209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              25
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                         9145
<OTHER-SE>                         39
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     9209
<SALES>                           229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  229
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               212
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .14
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company,
serving as Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: May 11, 2007                              /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Chief Financial Officer)




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth
Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007                       /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                              ---------------------------
                                              David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                              and Controller (serving as
                                              Chief Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 12-2


<TABLE>
                  PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                    AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
                                   SEC METHOD
                                     ($000)

                                                                                          6 MONTHS
<CAPTION>
                                                       ENDED
                                                     06/30/97
                                                     --------

<S>                                                  <C>     
NET INCOME                                           $235,856

ADD BACK:
- INCOME TAXES:
     OPERATING INCOME                                 166,627
     NON-OPERATING INCOME                              24,694
                                                      -------
     NET TAXES                                        191,321

- FIXED CHARGES:
     INTEREST APPLICABLE TO DEBT                      179,686
     ANNUAL RENTALS                                     4,249
                                                                                                   -------
     TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                              183,935

EARNINGS REQUIRED FOR PREFERRED DIVIDENDS:
     DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK                       9,018
     ADJUSTMENT TO PREFERRED DIVIDENDS*                 7,315
                                                      -------
                                                       16,333

FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                $200,268
                                                      =======

EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND
     FIXED CHARGES                                   $611,112
                                                     ========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
     AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS           3.05
                                                         ====




<FN>
 * ADDITIONAL CHARGE EQUIVALENT TO EARNINGS REQUIRED
   TO ADJUST DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK TO A PRE-TAX BASIS
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin E. Winfield, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), imposed July 6, 1987, upon his conviction of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his sentence constituted cruel and inhuman punishment is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Ingram,*67 NY2d 897, 899), and is, in any event, without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 3, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01293-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.J.P., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-30044-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 30, 2016 motion for an extension of time to file 

his brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief received on December 30, 2016 

filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
#### ROBINSON v. BONHAYE.

No. 17265.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 22, 1940.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1940.

Chas. J. Mundy, ’of New Orleans, for .appellant.

Appellee unrepresented.

JANVIER, Judge.

Ella Robinson, a widow, seeks recovery ■of damages from H. C. Bonhaye, alleging that, though she was a tenant of Bon-haye in the property numbered 1519 Baron-,ne Street in this city, the said Bonhaye, ■defendant, without cause -and without reporting to legal process, in effect ejected her by ordering her to leave and by taking out two of the window sashes and .a door, thus rendering the premises uninhabitable. She charges that, as a re<-:sult of his illegal action, it became necessary for her to close up the opening left by the removal of the window sashes by placing against it a “chifferrobe”, but that, nevertheless, because of the cold air which entered through the opening, she contracted “a heavy cold” and was ill for a period of two weeks.

The defendant filed no answer and was not represented at the trial in the • court below. There was judgment for defendant as in case of nonsuit; and plaintiff has appealed;

In his reasons for judgment the trial judge said: “The court, after hearing this matter and seeing the witnesses is not in position to fix the amount to be rendered, if any amount should be set.”

It is well settled that a landlord. has no right to take the law into his own hands and to forcibly eject, a tenant, or render the leased premises uninhabitable. Lindsey v. Zibilich, La.App., 153 So. 341; Lansalot v. Mihaljevich, 12 La.App. 174, 125 So. 183; Rogers v. Wood, 7 La.App. 637.

Plaintiff states that the furniture which she used to block the openings was' severly damaged and that this particular piece of furniture had cost $45. She added that it had a value of $45 at the time it was damaged. She also states that certain window shades were damaged and that they were valued at $1.25 apiece.

Concerning her health, 'her testimony is that she contracted a severe cold and was required to spend $2 for medicine,but “didn’t have any doctor”.

Though she- asks for $300, we are unable to state that she has suffered any serious loss, though unquestionably she is entitled to some amount to compensate her for, the annoyance and humiliation and for such slight actual damage as she sustained. We think $50 should amply compensate her for these items.

In certain instances in the record we find defendant’s name given as “Bonhage”, though in most instances he .is called “Bon-haye”.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is annulled, avoided and reversed, - and that there now be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Ella Robinson, and against H. C. Bonhaye» defendant, in the sum of $50, with legal interest from judicial demand, and for all costs.

Reversed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6890

JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 00-7081

JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-99-1359-2)

Submitted: November 22, 2000 Decided: December 6, 2000
2

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Alan Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Alan Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record, the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge, and the district court’s order denying Taylor’s postjudgment motions, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the

reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Angelone, No. CA99-1359-2 (E.D. Va. May 24, 1999; July 13, 2000). We also deny

Taylor’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 00-7081. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Graves, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered January 9, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, and *488criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the police were justified in their initial attempt to stop the defendant’s car because it was being operated after dark with a defective headlight in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375 (2) (a) *(see, People v Ellis,*62 NY2d 393, 396; *People v Harvey,*146 AD2d 585). In addition, the police had reasonable suspicion to believe that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity because his conduct and that of the codefendant Culbreath immediately prior to the attempted stop indicated that they were involved in a shoplifting scheme *(see, People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 223).

When one of the officers showed his badge and motioned the defendants’ car to pull over to the roadside, Culbreath drove the car away at a high rate of speed. During the ensuing high-speed chase, the defendant was seen directing Culbreath to drive on the wrong side of the road and to pass through several red traffic lights and stop signs. The defendant was also seen throwing a handful of torn pieces of paper from the passenger side window. Under such circumstances, we find that the police had probable cause to arrest *(see,*CPL 140.10; *People v De Bour, supra,*at 223).

Finally, we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the defendant’s *pro se*cross-examination of a police witness *(see, People v Duffy,*36 NY2d 258, *mot to amend remittitur granted*36 NY2d 857, *cert denied*423 US 861; *People v Hill,*134 AD2d 520). The court permitted the defendant to extensively cross-examine the officer concerning the police inventory search of the car *(see, Illinois v Lafayette,*462 US 640, 643-644; *People v Townsend,*152 AD2d 515, 517). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.