alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The undersigned, Michael J. Threet, is the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Silver State Bancorp (the
Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | (A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |  |  |                   |                         
|-------------------- |  |  | ----------------- | ------------------------
|Dated March 14, 2008 |  |  |                   | /s/    MICHAEL J.
THREET
|                     |  |  | Michael J. Threet
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6820 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6820

 To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to ensure that an 
 alien unlawfully present in the United States is not eligible for any 
   service through the Federal Emergency Management Food and Shelter 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 2022

Mr. Van Drew (for himself, Mr. Posey, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. 
 Donalds, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. Ellzey, 
 and Mr. DesJarlais) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to ensure that an 
 alien unlawfully present in the United States is not eligible for any 
   service through the Federal Emergency Management Food and Shelter 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Curbing Reckless Ill-conceived 
Spending on Illegal Services Act'' or the ``CRISIS Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY FOOD AND SHELTER LOCAL BOARDS.

    Section 302(b) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (49 
U.S.C. 11332(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
        (6) and (7); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) certify, at least annually to the National Board and 
        publish such certification locally, and ensure that no 
        recipient service provider provides any direct or indirect 
        service, including transportation, to an alien unlawfully 
        present in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6818 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6818

 To amend the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 to 
   extend the termination date of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records 
                             Review Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 2022

   Mr. Rush introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 to 
   extend the termination date of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records 
                             Review Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Cold Case 
Investigations Support Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL RIGHTS COLD CASE RECORDS REVIEW BOARD EXTENSION OF 
              TENURE.

    Section 5(n)(1) of Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 
2018 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note; Public Law 115-426) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``4 years'' and inserting ``7 years''; and
            (2) by striking ``4-year period'' and inserting ``7-year 
        period''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
              18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
              ---------------------------------------------


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Melvin S. Gordon, as Chief Executive Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of Paradise, Inc.



       /s/ Melvin S. Gordon            Date:  November 13, 2003
       -----------------------------
       Melvin S. Gordon
       Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7044 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7044

     To prohibit importation of nickel and copper from the Russian 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

  Mr. Perry (for himself and Mrs. Miller of Illinois) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit importation of nickel and copper from the Russian 
                              Federation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Not a Red Cent from Russia Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF NICKEL AND COPPER FROM THE 
              RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

    Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the President 
shall prohibit importation into the United States of nickel and copper 
from the Russian Federation.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  September 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Citicorp Banking Corporation
Address:   One Penn's Way
           New Castle, Delaware 19720

Form 13F File Number:              28-7574

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      William H. Wolf
Title:     Senior Vice President
Phone:     (302) 323-3118

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ William H. Wolf           New Castle, Delaware        November 12, 1999
----------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore CRISCIONE, aka Nicholas Criscione, aka Ted Criscione, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50531. D.C. No. CR-01-01233-R.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 29, 2003.

*701Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Theodore Criscione appeals the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy, mail fraud, and wire fraud. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We review de novo a district court’s compliance with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, *United States v. Carter,*219 F.3d 863, 866 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

Criscione contends that the district court erred by failing to make adequate findings regarding the “relevant conduct” used to enhance his sentence under U.S.S.G. §§ 1B1.3, 2B1.1, and 2Sl.l(a)(l). We disagree.

The district court was not obligated to make specific fact findings because Criscione did not contest any specific factual statements in the presentence report. *See id.*

Criscione further contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence based on conduct associated with the Fountain Valley property because the evidence was insufficient to establish that he was involved with a fraudulent transaction involving that property. This contention fails because the presentence report contains sufficient uncontested facts to support the enhancement. *See United States v. Romero-Rendon,*220 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2000).

Finally, Criscione’s constitutional challenge fails as he offers no support for his contention that the consideration of relevant conduct violated due process.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128754 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128754 COA: 252557 Oakland CC: 2002-186168-FC JEFFREY ALLEN NYE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ap ril 14, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 4.2

                [Letterhead of Bagell, Josephs & Company, L.L.C.]

                                  March 2, 2005


Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC



Dear Sir/Madam:

We have read the first and fourth paragraphs of Item 4.01 included in the
Form 8-K dated March 2, 2005 of Netfran Development Corp. to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements
contained therein.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Bagell, Josephs & Company, L.L.C.
-------------------------------------
    Bagell, Josephs & Company, L.L.C.
#### Mildred J. MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. M 02-21033.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 7, 2003.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiff brings various employment claims, including race discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment. In a comprehensive opinion, the district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

We have read the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We agree with the district court that on the basis of well settled law in this circuit and in the Supreme Court, there was no adverse employment action. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wntteb**~tate5** 

# QCourtof**~peal5** 

# for tbejf 

# eberal QCtrcutt

SHIRLEY K. 

### BAKER, Petitioner,


### v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

2010·3136

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Boardin PH0845100348·I·1.



### ONMOTION

ORDER The court treats Shirley K. Baker's motion for an ex· tension of time as a motion for reconsideration of the court's September 2, 2010 order dismissing her petition for review for failure to file a brief. Baker also moves for leave to proceed in form in forma pauperis. The court notes that Baker is not required to pay the docketingfee. Upon consideration thereof,BAKERv.OPM 2 

### IT Is ORDERED

### THAT: (1) The motion for reconsideration will be granted, the mandate will be recalled, the dismissal order will be vacated, and the petition for review will be reinstated, if Baker files her informal brief (form enclosed) within 30 days ofthe date offiling ofthis order. (2) Baker's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. The requirement that she pay the fee is waived.



## SEP 2 12010 Date FORTHE COURT
lsIJan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: ShirleyBaker (informal briefform enclosed) Michael D. Austin, Esq. s20 

### FILED 

### u.s. COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

## SEP 21 2010

JAN HORBALY 

### CLERK
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7677

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MARK JAMES KONSAVICH, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (5:05-cr-00019-gec-mfu-1; 5:08-cv-80100-gec) 

Submitted: December 16, 2009 Decided: January 19, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Mark James Konsavich, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Mark James Konsavich seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. 

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

Konsavich’s arguments on appeal and conclude Konsavich has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2007                            /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Mick J. Miller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Red Trail Energy, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 17, 2007                        /s/ Mick J. Miller   Mick J. Miller        Chief Executive Officer