alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.17


                      WHITE MOUNTAINS ANNUAL BONUS PROGRAM

Set forth below is a summary of the White Mountains Annual Bonus Program:

OVERVIEW

The White Mountains Annual Bonus Program (the "Program") is an integral part of
the total compensation program for employees of White Mountains Insurance Group,
Ltd. ("White Mountains") and certain of its subsidiaries. The Program is
overseen by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of White
Mountains. At the end of each year, separate bonus pools are established for the
non-investment personnel and the investment personnel based on performance. In
general, the bonus pool may range from 0% to 200% of the target. Individual
awards from the bonus pool may vary widely based on individual performance.

ANNUAL BONUS POOL DETERMINATION

For non-investment personnel, the targeted annual bonus pool is the sum of the
individual target bonuses for participants in the program. For senior officers,
the individual target is 50% of salary; more junior personnel receive
progressively lower targets. At the beginning of each year, one or more
performance metrics are selected as the goal(s) for the bonus program. Typically
for White Mountains' non-investment personnel, the performance metric is growth
in intrinsic value per share. For corporate performance above or below target,
the annual bonus pool can range from 0% to 200% of the targeted annual bonus
pool.

For investment personnel, the size of the targeted annual bonus pool is
established in the same manner as for non-investment personnel with senior staff
having an individual target of 50% of salary and more junior staff having
progressively lower targets. Typically, performance is measured based upon
achievement of one or more of the following factors: (i) the absolute level of
investment results; (ii) investment performance as compared to a range of
relevant benchmarks; and (iii) peer company investment results. White Mountains
may also factor in corporate circumstances and its effect on pure investment
performance such as acquisition related portfolio purchases, repositioning of
the portfolio or other relevant matters. Based upon performance. the annual
bonus pool can range from 0% to 200% of the targeted annual bonus pool.

The Compensation Committee reserves the flexibility to adjust the size of an
annual bonus pool up or down as it deems appropriate given special
circumstances.

INDIVIDUAL AWARDS

Individual bonuses can vary widely around an annual bonus pool average based on
individual performance. No cap applies to the bonus any one participant can
receive as a percentage of salary.

A limited number of special bonuses may be awarded in any year to recognize
successful individual results without regard to the aggregate size of an annual
bonus pool.

PROGRAM PARTICIPATION FOR NEW HIRES

Annual bonuses of those eligible employees hired during the year are typically
pro-rated based on date of hire.
#### Steven C. SIMS and Steven Sims, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GLOBAL RESOURCE, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-1273.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2002.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*443
      *JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1
------------


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrie Stores Liquidating Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Stephanie R. Joseph, as Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, and H. Bartlett
Brown, as Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of her or his knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.


/s/ Stephanie R. Joseph
-----------------------
Stephanie R. Joseph
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2005

/s/ H. Bartlett Brown
---------------------
H. Bartlett Brown
Chief Financial Officer
November 4, 2005


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Trust for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 13, 2017

d0110 

# Order

Clerk January 13, 2017

154783

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 154783

COA: 333361

Cass CC: 15

- 000723

- AV

TODD HOUSE and CAROL HOUSE,

Defendants/Counterplaintiffs

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissa l of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

HENRY ELMORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARLOTTE A. BURROWS, UNITED

STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, and JOHN

DOES 1

− 10,

Defendants. Civil Action No. 21

- 2347 (JMC)

ORDER

For the reasons state d in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and 42

U.S.C. § 1981 are DISMISSED , as are all Defendants except Charlotte A. Burrows , who is

named in he r official capacity as Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s surviving claims , ECF 6, is

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE , as is Defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement

of those claims

, id. ; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this civil action is TRANSFERRED to the U nited States

District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

SO ORDERED

.

DATE: October 13 , 2022

Jia M. Cobb

U.S. District Court Judge
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 99-1157

DENNIS J. SOLOMON, INDIVIDUAL, DENNIS J. SOLOMON, STOCKHOLDER, DENNIS J. SOLOMON, D/B/A VOLUMETRIC

IMAGING, VOLUMETRIC IMAGING, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.,

Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O’Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge ]
Before Torruella, Chief Judge , Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges .

Dennis J. Solomon on brief pro se. James F. Kavanaugh, Jr. and Conn, Kavanaugh, Rosenthal, Peisch & Ford on brief for appellees.-2- Per Curiam . Upon careful review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's motion for reconsideration and motion to amend his complaint to comply withFed. R. Civ. P. 23.1. Insofar as the motion for reconsideration sought relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), denial was required because the motion was untimely. See Vargas v. Gonzalez , 926 F.2d 916, 917 (1 stCir. 1992). The motion for reconsideration stated no grounds for relief cognizable under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). See Feinstein v. Moses , 951 F.2d 16, 19 n. 3 (1 stCir. 1991)(motions which seek to set aside judgment as legally erroneous are properly treated under Rule 59(e)). Absent a reopened judgment, denial of leave to amend was wholly proper. See , e.g. , Mirpuri v. Act Mfg., Inc. , 212 F.3d 624, 628 (1 stCir. 2000)("'[A] district court cannot allow an amended pleading where a final judgment has been rendered unless that judgment is first set aside or vacated pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 or 60.'")(citation omitted). The remaining contentions that the appellant argues either have been waived or are frivolous.

Affirmed . See Loc. Rule 27(c).
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

[CAPTION]
STATEMENT OF INCOME


(Dollars  in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)

                                      Unaudited          Unaudited
                                   3 Months Ended      9 Months Ended
                                    September 30        September 30
                                   2000      1999      2000      1999
<TABLE>
INCOME AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION:
     <S>                           <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
     Cash Rental                   $229      $229      $686      $686
     Interest                         -         -         -         -
                                    229       229       686       686

     Less general and
          administrative expenses    20        24        61        63

               NET INCOME          $209      $205      $625      $623



Per Share:
(1,510,000 average shares outstanding)

     Net Income                    $ .14     $ .14     $ .41     $ .41
     Cash Dividends                  .14       .14       .41       .41

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review R21s and R03s.                    

*Date:*                         October 15, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National lnstitutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jonathan Horsford, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Natl Inst of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Insitutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Room 664,Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4859,                         *horsforj@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 27, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy,

[FR Doc. E8-20430 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
-------------------------------------------------
(Unaudited; dollars in thousands)


                                                      June 30,      December 31,
                                                        1997           1996
                                                     ----------     ------------



Short-term debt ................................     $  195,900        66,500
Current portion of long-term debt ..............         48,500        38,200
Long-term debt .................................        602,800       554,600
                                                     ----------     ---------

     Total debt ................................        847,200       659,300
Minority interests in subsidiaries .............         90,400        85,500
Common shareholders' equity ....................      2,634,900     2,755,900
                                                     ----------     ---------

     Total capitalization ......................     $3,572,500     3,500,700
                                                     ==========     =========




Ratio of total debt to total capitalization ....           23.7%         18.8%
                                                     ==========     =========
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                       Registration No. 33-59791

                                  $500,000,000
                                    CITICORP
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series E
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series E
                Due From 9 Months to 50 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing Supplement, dated March 19, 1996
     (To Prospectus Supplement, dated August 7, 1995,
     to Prospectus, dated August 7, 1995).

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement and
modify,  to  the  extent  applicable,  the  description  of  general  terms  and
provisions of Citicorp's  Medium-Term  Subordinated Notes, Series E set forth in
the accompanying  Prospectus and Prospectus  Supplement.  Capitalized  terms not
defined  herein  shall  have  the  meanings   assigned  to  such  terms  in  the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:               7.20% Subordinated Notes Due March 15, 2008 (the
                              "Notes").

Aggregate
  Principal Amount:           $25,000,000.00.

Price to Public:              100.00%.

Issue Date:                   March 22, 1996.

Stated Maturity Date:         March 15, 2008.

Interest Rate:                7.20%.

Interest Payment Dates:       Monthly, on the 15th day of each month,
                              commencing on April 15, 1996, and at Stated
                              Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:         The first day of the month in which each Interest
                              Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:                 None.

Redemption:                   The Notes are subject to redemption, in whole but
                              not in part, at the option of Citicorp, on not
                              more than 60 or less than 30 days' notice, on any
                              Interest Payment Date, on or after March 15,
                              1999, at a redemption price of 100% of their
                              principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest
                              to the redemption date.

Selling Agent:                J.W. Korth & Co.

Agent's Commission:           2.00%.

Minimum Denomination:         $1,000.

CUSIP Number:                 17303 MEZ 8.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Brett Handelman, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
     Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
     this report on Form 10-K of MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust
     2006-FRE2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic  reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
     obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.


     Dated: September 18, 2007

     /s/ Brett Handelman
     Signature

     Vice President
      Title
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 33-59791


                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $7,000,000,000
                    Global Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series C
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                   Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series C
                  Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing Supplement,  dated  February 28, 1996
     (To Prospectus  Supplement,  dated August 7, 1995;
     to Prospectus, dated August 7, 1995)

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The terms of the Subordinated  Notes set forth in this Pricing  Supplement
supplement  and modify,  to the extent  applicable,  the  description of general
terms and provisions of Citicorp's Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series
C,  set  forth  in  the  accompanying   Prospectus  and  Prospectus  Supplement.
Capitalized  terms not defined  herein shall have the meanings  assigned to such
terms in the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:               7.10% Subordinated Fixed-Rate Notes Due
                              March 15, 2011 (the "Notes").
Aggregate
Principal Amount:             $10,000,000.00.

Price to Public:              100%.

Issue Date:                   March 15, 1996.

Stated Maturity:              March 15, 2011.

Interest Rate:                7.10% per annum.

Interest Payment Dates:       Monthly on the 15th day of each month,  commencing
                              April 15, 1996, and at Stated Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:         The first day of the month in which each Interest
                              Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:                 None.

Redemption:                   The Notes are subject to redemption,  in whole but
                              not in part,  at the  option of  Citicorp,  on not
                              more than 60 or less than 30 days' notice,  on any
                              Interest   Payment  Date  occurring  in  March  or
                              September  on  or  after  March  15,  1999,  at  a
                              redemption price of 100% of their principal amount
                              plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption
                              date.

Selling Agent:                Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated

Agent's Discount
 or Commission:               2.250%.

Minimum Denomination:         $1,000.

CUSIP Number:                 17303 MEX 3.
PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD
                              FORM 10-Q

                  MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS


          All of Registrant's railroad properties are on long-term lease
 to Norfolk and Western Railway Company for the fixed, unvarying amount
 of $915,000 cash rental per year. The lease also requires that
 additional, large amounts be recorded as non-cash rent income.


          With fixed revenue and expenses relatively constant, there is
 very little fluctuation in operating results between periods. In
 comparing the first quarter of 2000 with the preceding fourth quarter
 1999 and the first quarter of 1999, revenues totaled $229,000, $229,000
 and $229,000, respectively. Net income and income available for
 distribution was $213,000, $209,000 and $212,000, respectively.


 PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

           None



                              SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
 behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                              PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD




        05/10/00              Herbert E. Jones, Jr.
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Chairman of the Board



        05/10/00              Robert A. Hamstead
         Date                 (Signature)
                              Secretary and Treasurer


May 10, 2000
#### Theodore F. HAHN, Appellant, v. Charles E. TRIBBLE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Nov. 23, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.