alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET , STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                    0000077231                    
<NAME>                   PENNSYLVANIA ENTERPRISES, INC.     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      264,636,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    17,404,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         61,283,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       38,633,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,956,000
<COMMON>                                       48,900,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      24,572,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            52,909,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 126,381,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          640,000
<PREFERRED>                                    15,864,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           125,000,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             1,245,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  17,337,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      80,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 95,409,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  381,956,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      76,889,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           4,156,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     64,146,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     68,302,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        8,587,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (3,000)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 8,584,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,724,000
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,860,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    321,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  5,539,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       2,925,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         20,848,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .56
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0094 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOEL WESLEY SPEISER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 6 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 3 2024

10/03/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0094
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical 
Computing and Health Informatics Study Section, October 2, 2008, 8 a.m. 
to October 2, 2008, 5 p.m., Hilton Washington DC/Rockville, 1750 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, which was published in the Federal 
Register on August 18, 2008, 73 FR 48219-48220.
    The meeting will be held October 2, 2008, 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The 
meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: August 25, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20192 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029315
<NAME> PAYCO GENERAL AMERICAN CREDITS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,186
<INVENTORY>                                     68,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,105
<PP&E>                                          87,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### SALAUN et al. v. DUCASSE. *

No. 13909.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 2, 1932.

Henry G. Neyrey, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Lemle, Moreno & Lemle, of New Orleans, for appellees.

JANVIER, J.

Plaintiffs are the mother and father of Harold L. Salaun, a minor, whose automobile driven by him was in collision at 1:30 o’clock in the morning of December 20, 1930, with another automobile owned by defendant and driven by his minor son.

Plaintiffs claim that their son’s automobile sustained damages which would cost the sum of $187.50 to repair and they, therefore, bring this suit on his .behalf.

Defendant denies that his son was negligent in any of the particulars alleged and, by reconventional demand, claims the sum of $250 on behalf of his minor son for the pain, suffering, and nervous shock sustained by him.

Defendant’s car was proceeding on State street in the direction of the Mississippi river, and it was followed by the car of plaintiffs’ minor son. Defendant’s son intended turning to the left into the intersection of Tonti street, and as he did so the car he was driving was struck on its left side by the car of plaintiffs’ son. Plaintiffs contend that the car driven by their son approached defendant’s car from the rear; that he sounded, with his horn, a signal showing his intention *to*pass, and that he then turned slightly to go around the other car; and that just as he did so defendant’s car turned suddenly to the left and rendered a collision unavoidable.

On the other hand, defendant contends that his son had turned to the left side of the street at a point long before reaching Tonti street and that the accident resulted when plaintiffs’ son attempted to squeeze through on the left side of defendant’s car between it and the curbing.

The physical facts, such as skid marks and location of the cars after the accident, show that it was impossible that defendant’s car could have been alongside the left-hand curbing because there was no way in which the car of plaintiffs’ son could have squeezed between it and the curbing had it been in this position.

The trial judge saw and heard the witness, and we feel that we should follow the rule that a judgment on a question of fact will not be reversed unless manifestly erroneous.

The quantum has been properly proven, and it is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and it is, affirmed.

Affirmed.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as 

Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1198.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-1198

NORMAN, APPELLEE, v. KELLIE AUTO SALES,INC., APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 

2022-Ohio-1198.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Jezerinac v. Dioun.

(No. 2021-0207―Submitted March 29, 2022―Decided April 13, 2022.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 

No. 18AP-32, 2020-Ohio-6953. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 

Jezerinac v. Dioun, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-509, ___ N.E.3d ___. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, and 

STEWART, JJ., concur. 

 BRUNNER, J., not participating. 

_________________ 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

Coffman Legal, L.L.C., and Matthew J.P. Coffman; and Bryan Legal, 

L.L.C., and Daniel I. Bryant, for appellee, Justin Norman. 

Law Offices of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for 

appellant. 

_________________
Exhibit
        23.2


CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
        Statement No. 333-140205 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No.
        333-146428 on Form S-3 of
        our report dated March 13, 2008, relating to (i) the consolidated financial
        statements of EV Energy Partners, L.P. and (ii) the combined financial
        statements of the Combined Predecessor Entities, and the effectiveness of
        EV
        Energy Partners L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in
        this Annual Report on Form 10-K of EV Energy Partners, L.P. for the year
        ended
        December 31, 2007.
 
 Houston,
        Texas
 March
        13, 2008
#### PAYNE v. FOSTER.

No. 18311.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 27, 1946.

A. J. O’Keefe, of New Orleans, for appellant.

J. J. Jackson, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit for $150, the alleged balance due on the purchase price of a cer*238tain automobile. Zora Payne, the plaintiff, a blind woman, sues as the attorney-in-fact of Virginia Agobert. She alleges that acting for her principal she sold to the defendant, George Foster, a Ford automobile for $450, $300 of which he paid in cash.

The defendant claims that the automobile was sold to him for $300, which he paid in currency and that there is no further amount due plaintiff.

There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $150 and defendant has appealed.

Virginia Agobert moved from the City of New Orleans, where she had been residing, to Washington, D. C. She left her automobile with Zora Payne in order that she might use it until she could sell it. According to Zora Payne, George Foster asked her to sell him the car and she told him that the price was $450, whereupon he asked her to write her principal and endeavor to get the price reduced. A few days later and before she could get a reply from Virginia Agobert, Foster again sought to buy the Ford and this time put $300 in her lap and agreed to pay whatever balance Virginia Agobert demanded.

There were no witnesses to the sale, but Carrie Brown, Zora Payne’s aunt, who acted as her companion and assistant because of her -blindness, went to see Foster after the delivery of the Ford to him and she testified that Foster at first admitted that he owed and agreed to pay the balance of $150, and afterwards denied and refused to pay it.

No receipt was given to Foster for the $300 and none was asked for. No formal transfer in writing was given or requested. The transaction seems most peculiar and unbusinesslike, particularly since Foster is shown to be the proprietor of a restaurant employing some thirteen persons and is an official and stockholder of an insurance company. Be that as it may, the question of fact, which is the sole issue here, was resolved in plaintiff’s favor by the trial judge and we see no reason to disturb his findings, consequently, and

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6769 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to include requirements for works 

adopted by reference into law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. DEUTCH (for himself and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to include requirements for works adopted by reference into law, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting and En5 hancing Public Access to Codes Act’’ or the ‘‘Pro Codes 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. WORKS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO LAW. 

8 Chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amended 

9 by adding at the end the following new section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6769 IH

1 ‘‘§ 123. Works Incorporated by Reference into Law 

2 ‘‘(a) WORK INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO

3 LAW OR REGULATION.—An original work of authorship 

4 otherwise subject to protection under this title that has 

5 been adopted or incorporated by reference, in full or in 

6 part, into any Federal, State, or municipal law or regula7 tion, shall retain such protection only if the owner of the 

8 copyright makes the work available at no monetary cost 

9 for viewing by the public in electronic form on a publicly 

10 accessible website in a location on the website that is read11 ily accessible to the public. 

12 ‘‘(b) BURDEN OF PROOF.—In any cause of action in 

13 which a party asserts that the owner of a copyright has 

14 failed to comply with the requirements of subsection (a), 

15 the burden of proof shall be on the party making such 

16 an assertion to prove that the owner of the copyright has 

17 failed to comply. 

18 ‘‘(c) TRANSPARENCY.—Nothing in this section shall 

19 be construed as inconsistent with the requirements for 

20 transparency in Federal expenditure information as set 

21 forth in the DATA Act (Public Law 113–101; 31 U.S.C. 

22 6101).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION**
  **Ownit
          Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-3**
  
 I,
          Elizabeth Folk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton
          Loan
          Servicing LP, certify that:
 
 1.  I
          have
          reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
          to be
          filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ownit
          Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-3 (the “Exchange Act Periodic
          Reports”);
 
 2.  Based
          on
          my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
          contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
          fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
          which
          such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
          by
          this report;
 
 3.  Based
          on
          my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
          required
          to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
          included
          in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;
 
 4.  I
          am
          responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and
          based on
          my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
          compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
          AB,
          and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers
          have
          fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement in
          all
          material respects; and
 
 5.  All
          of
          the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
          securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
          with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
          in
          this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
          Act Rules
          13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
          as
          otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
          10-K.
 
 In
          giving
          the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
          to me
          by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National Association
          (custodian) and LaSalle Bank National Association (trustee).
 Date:  March
        29,
        2007




/s/
        Elizabeth Folk


Elizabeth
      Folk


Senior
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


Litton
      Loan Servicing LP


(Senior Officer
      in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.  

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 30th meeting of the American Health Information Community Population Health and Clinical Care Connections Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)  

# DATES:

September 17, 2008, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern Time].  

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.  

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how to facilitate the flow of reliable health information among population health and clinical care systems necessary to protect and improve the public's health. The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​pop_​instruct.html*.                  

Dated: August 5, 2008.  

Judith Sparrow,  

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.  

[FR Doc. E8-20334 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]  

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
#### Mathilda Brunner, Plaintiff, *v.*Benjamin Steinhardt, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Benjamin Steinhardt, Plaintiff, *v.*Mathilda Brunner, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

February 29, 1952.

*924
      *Samuel D. Friedman*for plaintiff in Action No. 1 and for defendant in Action No. 2.

*Gleason B. Speenburgh*and *Harry B. Lader*for defendant in Action No. 1 and for plaintiff in Action No. 2.

Peter M. Daly, J.

The parties hereto contracted for the purchase and sale of certain real property located in the County of Delaware, State of New York. Title having failed to close, the purchaser brought an action in this court to recover the deposit of $1,000 and served process upon the seller on September 6,1951. On January 23,1952, the seller instituted an action against the purchaser in the Supreme Court, Delaware County, for the specific performance of the contract for the sale of said property. Although issue in the purchaser’s action was joined on September 26, 1951, it was never placed upon the calendar for trial. Each party now moves to consolidate. The purchaser, however, requests that the consolidated action be tried in Queens County and the seller that it be tried in Delaware County.

The purchaser asserts that the convenience of material witnesses will be served by a trial in this county, whereas the seller insists that under the provisions of section 183 of the Civil Practice Act, he is entitled to have the consolidated action tried in Delaware County, the situs of the real property involved in his specific performance action.

"While a judgment affecting realty, in an action brought in a county other than that designated by statute as the proper county, has been held valid where the defendant did not avail himself of the provisions of the statute to have the cause removed to the proper county *(Railroad Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.*v. *Rosemont Holding Corp.,*248 App. Div. 909), here the seller has brought his action for specific performance in thfe county where the property is situated and resists the attempt of the purchaser to have the consolidated action tried in another county. He has thus invoked the provisions of section 183 of the Civil Practice Act, which requires certain real property actions including one such as this to “be tried in the county in which the subject of the action or some part thereof is situated ” *925(cf. *Manufacturers Trust Co.*v. *Roerich Museum,*236 App. Div. 76).

Since the issues presented by both actions are the same and an early trial can be obtained in Delaware County, the motion to consolidate is granted, the trial to take place in Delaware County. The purchaser, however, will have the right to open and close since her action was commenced first.

Settle order on notice.