alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20266]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee; Open Committee 
Meetings

    According to the provisions of section 10 of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that meetings of 
the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee will be held on--

Thursday, October 16, 2008
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008

    The meetings will start at 10 a.m. and will be held in Room 5A06A, 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management Building, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee is composed of a 
Chair, five representatives from labor unions holding exclusive 
bargaining rights for Federal blue-collar employees, and five 
representatives from Federal agencies. Entitlement to membership on the 
Committee is provided for in 5 U.S.C. 5347.
    The Committee's primary responsibility is to review the Prevailing 
Rate System and other matters pertinent to establishing prevailing 
rates under subchapter IV, chapter 53, 5 U.S.C., as amended, and from 
time to time advise the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
    These scheduled meetings will start in open session with both labor 
and management representatives attending. During the meetings either 
the labor members or the management members may caucus separately with 
the Chair to devise strategy and formulate positions. Premature 
disclosure of the matters discussed in these caucuses would 
unacceptably impair the ability of the Committee to reach a consensus 
on the matters being considered and would disrupt substantially the 
disposition of its business. Therefore, these caucuses will be closed 
to the public because of a determination made by the Director of the 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management under the provisions of section 
10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B). These caucuses may, depending on the issues 
involved, constitute a substantial portion of a meeting.
    Annually, the Chair compiles a report of pay issues discussed and 
concluded recommendations. These reports are available to the public, 
upon written request to the Committee.
    The public is invited to submit material in writing to the Chair on 
Federal Wage System pay matters felt to be deserving of the Committee's 
attention. Additional information on these meetings may be obtained by 
contacting the Committee at U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 
Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, Room 5526, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-2838.

    Dated: August 27, 2008.
Charles E. Brooks,
Chairman, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-20266 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-49-P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                       Washington, D.C. 20549
                                             
                             FORM 10-QSB
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
                          EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                   or
  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE                           ACT OF 1934
              FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
                    Commission File Number 0-6580
                      PEASE OIL AND GAS COMPANY
     (Name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

               Nevada                                  87-0285520
     (State or other jurisdiction of                       (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)                     Identification Number)


   751 Horizon Court, Suite 203 
     Grand Junction, Colorado                         81506
(Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip code)

                           (970) 245-5917
          (Issuer's telephone number, including area code)
                                  
     Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
                               (None)

     Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock (Par Value $.10 Per Share) Series A Cumulative Convertible
             Preferred Stock (Par Value $0.01 Per Share)
                           Title of Class

     Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports requir
ed tobe filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 mon
ths (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 
days.  Yes    No   

     As of November 1, 1996 the issuer had 7,316,207 shares of its $0.10 par 
value Common Stock and 202,688 shares of its $0.01 par value Series A Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.  As of November 1, 1996 the
aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates was 
$13,741,328. This calculation is based upon the closing sale price of $2.1875 
per share on November 1, 1996.
This submission is being filed to include the Article 5, Financial Data
Schedule, inadvertently omitted in the original filing of the Form 10-QSB on 
November 13, 1996.
                             SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, the
Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                   PEASE OIL AND GAS COMPANY



Date: November 13, 1996       By: /s/ Willard H. Pease, Jr. 
                                        Willard H. Pease, Jr.
                              President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 13, 1996       By: /s/ Patrick J. Duncan                      
                                       Patrick J. Duncan
                              Chief Financial Officer and
                              Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATEOF CEO AND CFO**     The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of FGBC Bancshares, Inc.(the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on our knowledge: (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificate isattached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.Dated: March 17, 2008                                                               /s/ Jackie L. Reed   Jackie L. Reed, CEO                                                                /s/ Teresa L. Martin   Teresa L. Martin, CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6899 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6899

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from engaging in transactions 
    involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued by the 
International Monetary Fund that are held by the Russian Federation or 
                                Belarus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2022

   Mr. Hill introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from engaging in transactions 
    involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued by the 
International Monetary Fund that are held by the Russian Federation or 
                                Belarus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Russia and Belarus SDR Exchange 
Prohibition Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS EXCHANGE PROHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury may not engage in 
any transaction involving the exchange of Special Drawing Rights issued 
by the International Monetary Fund that are held by the Russian 
Federation or Belarus.
    (b) Advocacy.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall--
            (1) vigorously advocate that the governments of the member 
        countries of the International Monetary Fund, to the extent 
        that the member countries issue freely usable currencies, 
        prohibit transactions involving the exchange of Special Drawing 
        Rights held by the Russian Federation or Belarus; and
            (2) direct the United States Executive Director at the 
        International Monetary Fund to use the voice and vote of the 
        United States to oppose any allocation of Special Drawing 
        Rights to the Russian Federation or Belarus.
    (c) Termination.--The preceding provisions of this section shall 
have no force or effect on the earlier of--
            (1) the date that is 5 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; or
            (2) 30 days after the date that the President reports to 
        the Congress that the governments of the Russian Federation and 
        Belarus have ceased destabilizing activities with respect to 
        the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
                                 <all>
```
sec document




                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33

                                                                  EXECUTION COPY

                                  ASSIGNMENT OF
                 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

                                       TO

                              EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.

            The  undersigned,  pursuant to that  certain  Amended  and  Restated
Securities  Contribution Agreement dated as of December 12, 2003, by and between
Empire Resorts,  Inc., Alpha  Monticello,  Inc.,  Catskill  Development,  L.L.C,
Americas Tower Partners ("ATP"),  Monticello Realty L.L.C.,  Watertone Holdings,
LP, New York Gaming,  LLC,  Fox-Hollow  Lane, LLC,  Shamrock  Strategies,  Inc.,
Clifford A. Ehrlich,  BKB,  LLC,  Robert A. Berman,  Philip B. Berman,  Scott A.
Kaniewski,  Kaniewski Family Limited  Partnership and KFP Trust (the "SECURITIES
CONTRIBUTION  AGREEMENT"),  and the  unanimous  written  consent of the  general
partners of ATP,  effective  as of the  Closing  (as  defined in the  Securities
Contribution Agreement),  hereby (i) assigns,  transfers and conveys all of the.
right,  title and interest in ATP's  membership  interest in Monticello  Raceway
Development  Company,  LLC ("MRD") to Empire Resorts,  Inc. and (ii) consents to
the admission of Empire Resorts, Inc. as a member of MRDD in accordance with the
terms of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for MRD, dated as of January 1,
1999.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]







            IT WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Assignment to
be effective as of January 12, 2004.

                                             AMERICAS TOWER PARTNERS


                                             By: /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                                 ---------------------------
                                             Name:   Joseph E. Bernstein
                                             Title:  Managing Director













                 ASSIGNMENT BY ATP OF INTERESTS IN MRD TO EMPIRE







                                   SCHEDULE A

                 Limited Liability Company Membership Interests

ASSIGNEE                   ASSIGNED PERCENTAGE MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN MONTICELLO
                           RACEWAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC


Americas Tower Partners                         50.00%
Exhibit 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333– 163686 and 333–140205 on Form S–8 of EV Energy Partners, L.P. of our report dated February 28, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of EV Energy Partners, L.P. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to accounting changes during 2009 for (1) oil and natural gas reserves and disclosures and (2) business combinations) and the effectiveness of EV Energy Partners L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10–K of EV Energy Partners, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Houston, Texas


February 28, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 5, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 |  | /S/ R. LIEBLE          
|                   |  | R. Lieble,             
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### WYNN v. HILLMAN.

No. 4414.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 28, 1933.

Barksdale, Warren & Barksdale, of Rus-ton, for appellant.

Scarborough & Barham, of Ruston, for ap-pellee.

MILLS, Judge.

This is an action wherein plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant from interfering with the free use and possession of property owned and possessed by plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals devolutively from a judgment in the lower court rejecting his demands for a preliminary injunction.

*550In this court defendant files a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that since the trial of the case plaintiff has sold the property concerned to one William A. Taylor, who in turn has conveyed it to defendant; that plaintiff, having parted with the land, is without interest to prosecute the appeal which now presents a purely moot question.

Where a motion to dismiss an appeal is based on matters dehors the record, the case will be remanded for the sole purpose of taking evidence on the issiues of fact raised in the motion. Levert v. Sterling Planting Co., 136 La. 1065, 68 So. 127.

The ease is accordingly remanded to the lower court for the sole purpose of taking evidence on the question of present ownership raised in the motion to dismiss.
210 La. 450

#### Robert W. O’MEARA v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE. Maurice O’MEARA v. SAME.

Nos. 38005, 38006.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1946.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1946.

John B. Smullin and C. C. Bird, Jr.' both of Baton Rouge, for defendant and appellant.

Moss & Graham and Kaufman & Anderson, all of Lake Charles, for petitioners-ap-pellees.-

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Both of these cases involve the validity of Article 107 of the Rules and Regulations Concerning Income Taxes, promulgated in November, 1938, by the Collector of Revenue, State of Louisiana.

The issue raised in these cases has been fully determined in the case of Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey (Formerly Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana) v. Collector of Revenue, La.Sup., 27 So.2d 268, all three of which were treated in argument before this court as one case.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey (Formerly Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana) v. Collector of Revenue, the judgment of the district court in each of these cases is affirmed.

O’NIELL, C. J., absent.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP. **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-4 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a  materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Greenpoint MortgageCompany.

 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
April 19, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GLENN HEGAR, COMPTRO LLER OF PUBLIC ACCOU NTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND KEN PA XTON, ATTORNEY GENER AL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS , A ppellant s
NO. 14

- 15

- 00027

- CV V.

CHECKFREE SERVICES C ORPORATION , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, CheckF ree Services Corporation, signed September 2, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, jointly and severally, to pay all cos ts incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40829

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDIS MAURICIO YANEZ-REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-145-1 

- - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edis Mauricio Yanez-Reyes appeals his guilty-plea conviction

and sentencing for illegal reentry after deportation in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). He argues that his conviction

and sentencing for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is legally

invalid because his previous convictions were not alleged in the

indictment or proved at trial beyond a reasonable doubt. He also

argues that the sentencing court violated his right to due

process by determining that § 1326(b)(2) is merely a sentencing

enhancement of the offense delineated in § 1326(a) rather than a 
No. 97-40829

-2-

separate offense. These arguments are foreclosed by the United

States Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, ___ U.S. ___, 1998 WL 126904, at *3, *8 and *10-15 (U.S.

Mar. 24, 1998).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                         5,844,776
<SECURITIES>                  12,928,118
<RECEIVABLES>                    414,138
<ALLOWANCES>                      60,000
<INVENTORY>                    2,447,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              23,771,959
<PP&E>                         4,294,262
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,695,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                26,748,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          1,829,101
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                       4,849,888
<OTHER-SE>                    20,038,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  26,748,177
<SALES>                          553,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               2,303,090
<CGS>                          2,375,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  2,375,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               3,828,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 3,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (3,371,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (3,371,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                   111,539
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (3,260,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.27)