alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Reed et al. v. Cates.

1. By appearing in the county court, and, without questioning its jurisdiction on the ground of non-residence, entering on trial on the merits, a defendant gives that court complete jurisdiction of the action.

2. A bill of exceptions not sealed by the trial judge cannot be considered.

*Appeal from Garfield County Court.*

This was an action brought by Wilson Cates against W. T. Reed and A. A. Reed. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Mr. J. W. Dollison, for appellants.

Rising, C.

This action was commenced in a justice’s court in Garfield county, by appellee against appellants, in which court judgment was rendered for defendants, and the plaintiff appealed to • the county court of said county. The defendants appeared in the county court, and prosecuted their .defense to the action upon the merits, and have appealed from the judgment rendered therein against them on the verdict of a jury for the sum of $15Y.20. The errors assigned are: (1) That the court did not have jurisdiction to try the cause, for the reason that the defendants were residents of Eagle county; (2) that the evidence does not support the verdict. The first assignment of error is not well taken. The defendants by appearing in the county court, and, without in any way questioning the jurisdiction to try the case, entering upon the trial thereof upon its merits, gave the court full and complete jurisdiction to proceed therein.

An examination of the evidence shows such a conflict therein that this court would not be warranted in reversing the judgment upon the ground assigned in the second assignment of error; but, for the reason that the "bill of exceptions is not sealed by the judge, it cannot be con*528sidered. *De La Mar v. Hurd,*4 Colo. 443; *Mining Co. v. Kirtley,*8 Colo. 108. If the bill of exceptions had been properly sealed, it would be insufficient to authorize an examination of the evidence for the purpose of ascertaining its sufficiency to support the verdict, for the reason that it does not purport to contain all the evidence. The judgment should be affirmed.

De France and Stallcup, 00., concur.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 21
- 00071
- CV

________________ JACOB SMITH , Appellant
V. SAREN SMITH , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appe al from the 128 th District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. A20 0 493
- D

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 31, 2021 , we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant did not file a response. In his notice of appeal, appellant stated that he was appealing the trial court’s order denying his motion for new trial, which was signed on February 25, 2021. An order denying a motion for new trial is n ot independently appealable; therefore, it does not start a new timetable for perfecting appeal. State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan , 335 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied). “An appeal must be taken from the final judgment, not the refusal to reconsider that2 judgment.” Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 0 1

- 1 9

- 00 610

- CV, 201 9 WL
4677365 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Sept. 26, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op

. ). “[T]he time for filing a notice of appeal runs from the signing of the final judgment, not the subsequent denial of a mot ion for new trial.” Id . at *2. The trial court signed a final judgment on November 3, 2020 , and the appellate timetables were extended by the timely filing of a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on February 1, 2021

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 26, 2021, more than ninety days
f

rom the date of judgment and outside the period for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DIS MISSED

. PER CURIAM Submitted on May 12, 2021 Opinion Delivered May 13, 2021 Before Golemon , C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Martin Associates (WB993-1—1/25/08), for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9. 

*For Further Information Contact:*                     Mac Frampton, (202) 245-0317.                 

Anne K. Quinlan, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-2072 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00148

- CR

D EVUNTRA C LAY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On A ppeal from Criminal District Court

No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 1685361D )

September 7 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the tria l cour t’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ANDREW KUNDRATIC,

 Petitioner

 v.

SOPHIA CAROL KUNDRATIC,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 555 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31(b)**
**RULE 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Richard L. Travis, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peerless Mfg. Co.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during theperiod in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reportingthat occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.    /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.  Richard L. Travis, Jr.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                     |     |                                     
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                     
|Date: August 8, 2008 | By: | /s/ M.J. Cohen                      
|                     |     | M. J. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 663 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require inclusion of the 

taxpayer’s social security number to claim the refundable portion of 

the child tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2021 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

inclusion of the taxpayer’s social security number to 

claim the refundable portion of the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refundable Child Tax 

5 Credit Eligibility Verification Reform Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 663 IH

1 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED TO CLAIM 

2 THE REFUNDABLE PORTION OF THE CHILD 

3 TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(6) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

9 not apply to any taxpayer for any taxable year 

10 unless the taxpayer includes the taxpayer’s so11 cial security number on the return of tax for 

12 such taxable year. 

13 ‘‘(B) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a 

14 joint return, the requirement of subparagraph 

15 (A) shall be treated as met if the social security 

16 number of either spouse is included on such re17 turn. 

18 ‘‘(C) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.—For 

19 purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘social se20 curity number’ means a social security number 

21 issued to an individual by the Social Security 

22 Administration (other than a social security 

23 number issued pursuant to subclause (II) (or 

24 that portion of subclause (III) that relates to 

25 subclause (II)) of section 205(c)(2)(B)(i) of the 

26 Social Security Act).’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 663 IH

1 (b) OMISSIONS TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

2 CLERICAL ERROR.—Section 6213(g)(2)(I) of such Code 

3 is amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(I) an omission of a correct social secu5 rity number required under section 24(d)(6) 

6 (relating to refundable portion of child tax cred7 it), or a correct TIN required under section 

8 24(e) (relating to child tax credit), to be in9 cluded on a return,’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Imperiali, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Imperato,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge:
  1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/Daniel
      ImperatoDaniel
      ImperatoPrincipal
      Financial OfficerMay
      1, 2009
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      The Travelers Insurance Company
Address:   One Tower Square
           Hartford, Connecticut 06183

Form 13F File Number:              28-1299

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Marla Berman Lewitus
Title:     Assistant Secretary
Phone:     (212) 793-7338

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Marla Berman Lewitus        New York, New York      August 16, 1999
------------------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONAL
PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-05-1997
<CASH>                                          89,869
<SECURITIES>                                   123,023
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,277
<PP&E>                                          19,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,441
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,626
<SALES>                                         59,734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,734
<CGS>                                           42,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chyron Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Kieliszak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2006

| | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
| | -------------------------
| | Jerry Kieliszak          
| | Senior Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer  
| |
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                Exhibit 10.68(b)

                    List of Contents of Exhibit and Schedules
                      to the Ulico Stock Purchase Agreement

<TABLE>
<S>                    <C>
Schedule 2.2(d)    -   Authorized States
Schedule 3.1(b)    -   Officers and Directors/Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Schedule 3.2(b)    -   Notices of Suspension, Cancellations, or Terminations of Insurance Permits
Schedule 3.8       -   Tax Matters
Schedule 3.9(b)    -   Filing Fees
Schedule 3.10(b)   -   Consents and Approvals
Schedule 3.11(a)   -   Legal Proceedings
Schedule 3.11(b)   -   Legal Proceedings Brought by the Company
Schedule 3.12      -   Bank Accounts
Schedule 3.13      -   Capital and Surplus
Schedule 3.14      -   Liabilities
Schedule 3.15(a)   -   Contracts and Commitments to be Terminated or Amended at Closing
Schedule 3.15(b)   -   Third-Party Reinsurance Agreements
Schedule 3.17      -   Power of Attorney
Schedule 3.20(b)   -   Certain Fee Arrangements
Schedule 4.3(b)    -   Purchasers' Governmental Approvals

Exhibit A          -   Administrative Services Agreement
Exhibit B          -   Amended Termination of Pooling Agreement
Exhibit C          -   Assumption Agreement
Exhibit D          -   Guarantee
Exhibit E          -   100% Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement
Exhibit F          -   Termination and Commutation of LPT Agreement
Exhibit G          -   Trust Agreement
</TABLE>