U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Testing the Accuracy and Reliability of Palmar Friction Ridge Comparisons: A Black Box Study
NCJ Number
              304606

Author(s)
          Heidi Eldridge;
                        Marco De Donno;
                        Christophe Champod
Date Published

May 2020
Length
              19 pages
Annotation
              Findings and methodology are presented for a study with the goal of constructing a “black box” study modeled after the FBI/Noblis study that meets specified criteria for the discipline-wide error-rate estimate for the comparison of palmar impressions.
Abstract
              The following criteria should be met to establish an informative error rate for palmar impressions:  1) Palmar impressions should be presented and error rates constructed for them separate from those of distal phalanges; 2) Test impressions at different quality levels should be used and error rates calculated for each, so that meaningful comparisons to casework images can be made; and 3) Close non-matches should be incorporated to present a realistic chance of making a false-positive. In the current study, palm marks of known sources were collected from 50 individuals at six partner laboratories. The donated impressions produced 725 known source mark/exemplar pairings (cases). Marks were made on a variety of substrates using a variety of development techniques to mimic casework. Once the cases had been selected, random draws of 75 cases were made for each participant, so that each received 53 same sources and 22 different sources. In all, 12,279 analysis determinations and 9,460 comparison decisions were rendered. Each case was viewed by an average of 23 examiners. A global overview of the results for all participants. shows that as the difficulty of the comparison increases, so does the false negative error rate. This supports the concept of defining thresholds for comparison difficulty and documenting these levels in case notes. A summary is provided of false negative error rates stratified by the areas of the palm from which the mark originated. There are clearly areas of the palm that pose greater and lesser challenges to examiners.
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2017-DN-BX-0170


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Grant Sponsored)
                                Research (Applied/Empirical)


  
  
        
  Award
        Testing the Accuracy and Reliability of Palmar Friction Ridge Comparisons: A Black Box Study
    
  
  
Date Published: May 1, 2020
    
          Downloads
        
                      PDF

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Forensic sciences
        Palm prints
        Evidence analysis
        Probabilistic evidence
        Statistical analysis



  
Similar Publications
        
                      A Diagnosis of the Primary Difference between EuroForMix and STRmixTM
                  Technical Note – Microcrystal Tests
                  Notes from the Field: Cluster of Severe Illness from Neptune’s Fix Tianeptine Linked to Synthetic Cannabinoids — New Jersey, June–November 2023
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov