alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marvin REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. ALGER-SULLIVAN LUMBER COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

Nov. 30, 1954.

Coe & Coe, Pensacola, for appellant.

Yonge, Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The central issue submitted to, and resolved by, the jury in this case, upon conflicting evidence, .was the location of a government section corner. The record provided no basis for a charge pertaining to a “boundary by acquiescence” and the trial court therefore did not err in refusing the charge taken from Shaw v. Williams, Fla., 50 So.2d. 125, which had no application to the case at bar. The ruling on the charge actually given was not assigned. as error. See City of Coral Gables v. State ex rel. Hassenteufel, Fla., 38 So.2d 467.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW and BARNS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Mark W. Simon, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

1.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31,
     2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 15, 2003

                                              /s/ Mark  W. Simon
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Mark W. Simon
                                              Senior Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6845 

To provide for transparent licensing of commercial remote sensing systems. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2022 

Mr. LUCAS (for himself and Mr. PERLMUTTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To provide for transparent licensing of commercial remote 

sensing systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Remote 

5 Sensing Amendment Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS. 

7 (a) DEADLINES.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 60121(c) of title 51, 

9 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘120’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘60’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6845 IH

1 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

2 60126(a)(1)(E) of title 51, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘120’’ and inserting ‘‘60’’. 

4 (b) NOTIFICATIONS.—Section 60126(a)(2) of title 

5 51, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘section 

6 60122; and’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (5) and (6) of sec7 tion 60122(b);’’. 

8 (c) CONDITIONS.—Section 60126(a) of title 51, 

9 United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para11 graph (4); 

12 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

13 end; and 

14 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(3) all terms, conditions, or restrictions placed 

17 on licensees pursuant to section 60122; and’’. 

18 (d) TIERS.—Section 60126(a)(1) of title 51, United 

19 States Code, is amended— 

20 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

21 the end; 

22 (2) in subparagraph (E), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at 

23 the end; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6845 IH

1 ‘‘(F) a list of all applications, listed by tier 

2 as defined in regulation, as well as the rationale 

3 for each tier categorization;’’. 

4 (e) SUNSET.—Section 60126 of title 51, United 

5 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

# Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Photo Control Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                           |                                                                                              | 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |  | Photo Control Corporation |                                                                                             
|Date: October 31, 2003 |  | By                        | /s/   Curtis R. Jackels                                                                      | 
|                       |  |                           | Curtis R. JackelsChief Executive Officer,President and Director(principal executive officer) | 
|                       |  | By                        | /s/   Christopher S. Lausen                                                                  | 
|                       |  |                           | Christopher S. LausenTreasurer(principal financial officer)                                  | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Photo Control Corporation and will
be retained by Photo Control Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

14

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chyron Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Wellesley-Wesley,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2006

| | /s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley
| | ----------------------------
| | Michael Wellesley-Wesley    
| | President and               
| | Chief Executive Officer     
| |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DCP Holding Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of the Company, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Anthony A. Cook                               
|President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|Principal Executive Officer                       
|                                                  
|March 9, 2011                                     
|                                                  
|/s/ Robert C. Hodgkins, Jr.                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer        
|Principal Financial Officer                       
|                                                  
|March 9, 2011                                     

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                            6882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    98105
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2159
<INVENTORY>                                      63648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                177268
<PP&E>                                          252778
<DEPRECIATION>                                   50544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  536496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            99691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20606
<OTHER-SE>                                      126551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    536496
<SALES>                                         298788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                298788
<CGS>                                           248390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   267169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  26279
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              15884
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     15884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


First Meeting, RTCA/PMC New Special Committee 219: Attitude and 
Heading Reference Systems (AHRS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 219 meeting: Attitude and 
Heading Reference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 219 meeting: Attitude and Heading 
Reference Systems (AHRS).

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 16-17, 2007, from 9 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, 
MacIntosh NBAA and Hilton-ATA Rooms, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5 133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 219 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> September 16-17:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome, Introductions and Administrative 
Remarks).
    <bullet> Agenda Overview.
    <bullet> RCTA Functional Overview.
    <bullet> Review Current Guidance/Technical Standard Orders--
Discussion.
    <bullet> Committee Scope--Terms of Reference.
    <bullet> Organization of Work, Assign Tasks and Workgroups. 
Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations, Assignment of 
Responsibilities.
    <bullet> Establish Dates, Location and Agenda for Next Meeting.
    <bullet> Closing Session (Any Other Business, Assignment/Review of 
Future Work, Establish Agenda, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Closing 
Remarks, Adjourn). Attendance is open to the interested public but 
limited by space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, 
members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. 
Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 22, 2008.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-19896 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1479
CHERYL A. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES TAYLOR; JOHN O’DONALD; DARRELL BETSILL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-2013-7-HMH) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl A. Davidson, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina; Michael Stephen Pauley, VINTON D. LIDE & ASSOCIATES, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Cheryl A. Davidson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Davidson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) suit. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in which he recommended granting summary judgment to Defendants. The district court adopted the report and recommendation, finding that Davidson failed to file specific objections. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). On appeal, Davidson does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that her objections were merely general. See 4th Cir. R. 34 (b) (failure to raise claim in informal brief waives consideration of that claim). Accordingly, we c onclude that Davidson has waived appellate review of both the substance of the magistrate judge’s report and the district court’s construction of her objections. Thus, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal- 3 - contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


The Board of Directors
Polaroid Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:      Registration Statements No. 33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on Form
         S-3, No. 33-51173 on Form S-8, No. 333-32283 on Form S-8, No. 333-32285
         on Form S-8, No. 333-67647 on Form S-3 and No. 333-96051 on Form S-3 of
         Polaroid Corporation

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 18, 2000, related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 ("the Act"), such
report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified
by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                 Very truly yours,

                                                 /S/ KPMG LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
August 14, 2000








                                                                              38
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Base Closure and Realignment

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of Economic Adjustment.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is provided pursuant to section 2905(b)(7)(B)(ii) 
of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990. It provides a 
partial list of military installations closing or realigning pursuant 
to the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) Report. It also 
provides a corresponding listing of a successor Local Redevelopment 
Authority (LRA) for Newport Chemical Depot, Indiana recognized by the 
Secretary of Defense, acting through the Department of Defense Office 
of Economic Adjustment (OEA), as well as the point of contact, address, 
and telephone number for the successor LRA for this installation. 
Representatives of state and local governments, homeless providers, and 
other parties interested in the redevelopment of the installation 
should contact the person or organization listed. The following 
information will also be published simultaneously in a newspaper of 
general circulation in the area of the installation. There will be 
additional Notices providing this same information about LRAs for other 
closing or realigning installations where surplus government property 
is available as those LRAs are recognized by the OEA.

DATES: Effective Date: August 29, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Office of Economic 
Adjustment, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 400 Army Navy Drive, 
Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22202-4704, (703) 604-6020.

Local Redevelopment Authorities (LRAs) for Closing and Realigning 
Military Installations

Indiana

    Installation Name: Newport Chemical Depot.
    LRA Name: Newport Chemical Depot Reuse Authority, successor to 
Newport Chemical Depot Redevelopment Authority.
    Point of Contact: Ed Cole, Executive Director, Vermillion County 
Economic Development Council.
    Address: 2250 North Main Street, Clinton, IN 47842.
    Phone: (765) 832-3870.

    Dated: August 22, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E8-20056 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Alamo Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Philip Mann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alamo Energy Corp., and will be retained by Alamo Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Philip MannPhilip Mann,

Chief Financial Officer

August 4, 2010
#### Rudolph Henninger, Landlord, Respondent, *v.*John Clay, Tenant, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

December 19, 1956.

*Lawrence M. Honig*for appellant.

*Milton Gelman*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

According to the testimony the rent was due and payable on September 29, 1956. The tenant was not in default until the end of that day; therefore the service of the petition and precept on September 29, 1956 was premature.

The final order and judgment should be unanimously reversed, upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to tenant, and petition dismissed.

Pette, Hart and Di G-iovanna, JJ., concur.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.
#### Hiram ASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Trade Lee ASH; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 02-57137, 03-55028. D.C. No. CV-02-06137-PA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*685Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 28, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Ash’s request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

In these consolidated appeals, Hiram Ash appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, his action alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and elder abuse. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Olson Farms, Inc. v. Barbosa,*134 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

Ash’s complaint asserted claims relating to the revocation of the Ash Trust which were previously considered and ruled upon by two different state courts in California and Oregon. Consequently, the district court properly dismissed Ash’s action because it challenged these final state court determinations, and raised federal constitutional claims that were “inextricably intertwined” with those state court judgments. *See Doe & Assocs. Law Offices v. Napolitano,*252 F.3d 1026, 1029 (9th Cir. 2001).

Ash’s “Urgent Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3(b) to Expedite Hearing On These Appeals” is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.