**Exhibit 34 a)*****[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO]***PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  10 Tenth Street, Northwest Suite 1400  Atlanta,. G4 30303-3351  Telephone (678)419 1000  Faxcimile (6Th) 419 1229  **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of  Assurant, Inc.:  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with I 122(d)(2)(vi) and II22(d)(4)(xi) of Regulation AS Servicing Criteria, that American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc., collectively the "Asserting Party') complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all mortgage loan-tracking transactions for which the Asserting Party served as a Vendor on behalf of Servicers for such asset-backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform', as of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended, excluding (i) criteria 1122(d)(l)(i) through 1122 (d)(1)iv), 1122 (d)(2)(i) through 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) through 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122((4)(i) through 1122(d)(4)(x) and I 122(d)(4)(xii through 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Asserting Party has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by It with respect to the Platform and (ii), criterion 1122(d)(4)(xii), which relates to servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform, big are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary In the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset- backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Asserting Party complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31. 2006 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  Atlanta. Georgia February 23,2007  **Exhibit 34 b)**[Ernst & Young logo] Earnst & Young LLP Suite 3300 Phone: (720) 931-4000 370 17th Street Fax:  (720) 931-4444 Denver, Colorado 80202-5663 **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm****Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform**Board of Directors Aurora Loan Services LLC We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan master servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Regulation AB 1122 Master Servicing Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP March 13, 2007 **Exhibit 34 c)**[ERNST& YOUNG LOGO]ERNST& YOUNG LLP Phone: (720) 9314000 Suite 3000Fax: (720) 931-4444370 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80202-5663**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm****Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform**Board of Directors Aurora Loan Services LLC We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1 122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1 122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by the Interpretation 17.06 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.As described in management's assertion, for servicing criteria 1 122(d)(2)(i), 1 122(d)(4)(iv), 1 122(d)(4)(vii), 1 122(d)(4)(xi) and 1 122(d)(4)(xii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform certain activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06. As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to providereasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1 122(d)(2)(i), 1 122(d)(4)(iv), 1 122(d)(4)(vii), 1122 (d)(4)(xi) and 1 122(d)(4)(xii) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the  Regulation AB 1122 Servicing Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ ERNST& YOUNG LLPMarch 13, 2007**Exhibit 34 d)**PriceWaterhouseCoopersPriceWaterhouseCoopersSuite 18002001 Ross Ave.Dallas, TX 75201-2997Telephone:  214-999-1400Facsimile:  214-754-7991www.pwc.com**Report of Independcnt Registered Public Accounting Firm**To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation: We have examined First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L. P.'s (the `Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation), compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item I1(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for an loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company salved as the residential tax service provider (the Platform) described In the accompanying Report on 4ssessment or Compliance, as of December 3l, 2006 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d )(l)(1-(iii), 1122(d)(2i)-{iv), 1122(d)(3)(i-iv),ll22(d)(4)(I)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(x)-(xv), wh ich the Comp any has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by It with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion On the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria  based on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United Stales) and accordingly, included examining, on a fest basis, evidence about The Company's comp liance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determin ingwhether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactionsand servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not des igned to detect noncomp liance arising from errors that nay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by theCompany during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.Our examination disclosed The following material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(2)(v ii)(B) of Regulation AB applicable to the company during year ended December31, 2006. Account reconciliations for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts were not prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified In the transaction agreements as required by item  1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB.In our opinion except for the material Instance of noncompliance described In the preceding paragraph, First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, LP. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended Oecemberal,2006 for all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential tax service provider, in all materialrespects./s/  PriceWaterhouseCoopersFebruary 28,2007 **Exhibit 34 e)**PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP       300 Madison Avenue        New York NY 10017 Telephone (846) 471-3000  www.pwc.com**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**To the Board of Directors of Residential Capital, LLC:  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Managements Assertion Concerning Compliance with Regulation AS Item 1122 Servicing Criteria, that GMAC Mortgage, LLC (the "Company", a subsidiary of Residential Capital, LLC, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the GMACM Private Platform (the "Platform"). as of and for the year then ended December 31. 2006. excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii); 1122(d)(2)(iv); 1122(d)(3)(i)(ii); and 1122(d)(4)(i),(ii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary In the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset- backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the app1icable servicing criteria, Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the GMACM Private Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York March 6, 2007 **Exhibit 34 f)**[Ernst & Young logo] Ernst & Young LLP  Phone: (703) 747-1000         8484 Westpark Drive   www.ey.com          McLean, VA 22102Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of DirectorsGreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. We have examined management's assertion included in the accompanying report of Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation All for the residential mortgage loan servicing platform, except for the instances of material noncompliance described therein, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, and except for criteria 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by the Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available TelephoneInterpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the  period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have  affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  As described in management's assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors  are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06.  As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in itsassertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iv), and 1122(d)(3)(ii) applicable to the Company's platform covered by this report during the year ended December 31, 2006. 1122(d)(1)(i) - There were no policies and procedures instituted to monitor the performance or other triggers and events of defaults in accordance with the transaction agreements; 1122(d)(2)(iv) - The related accounts for each transaction were not separately maintained as set forth in the transaction agreements; and, 1122(d)(3)(ii) - Amounts due to investors were not remitted in accordance with the timeframes set forth in the transaction agreements.  The information in the Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria in Item 2 of Appendix B (i.e., remediation procedures) is presented by the Company for information purposes. Such information has not been subjected to the procedures applied in our examination of management's assertion as described above, and accordingly, we express no opinion on it.  In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the fourth paragraph, the Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1 122(d)(2)(i) and II 22(d)(4)(iv) for whichcompliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the residential mortgage loan servicing platform.  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP March 1, 2007 **Exhibit 34 g)**Grant Thornton LOGO **REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**Board of Directors and Shareholders  LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's Report"), that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company') complied with the servicing criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage backed securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv),1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1l22(d)(4)(i)-(x) and  1122(d)(4)(xii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform,. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's servicing activities during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria  In our opinion, management's assertion that LandAmerica Tax and Food Services, Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respect.  /s/ Grant Thornton LLP Irvine, CA  February 20, 2007  18400 Von, Karman Avenue Suite 900Irvine, CA 92612-0525  T 949.553.1600 F 949.553.0163 www.grantthornton.com Grant Thornton LLP Us member of Grant Thornton International **Exhibit 34 h)**[KPMG LOGO]KPMG LLP Suite 2000 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmThe Board of Directors Newport Management Corporation:We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Newport Management Corporation (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's RegulationAB for pools of loans, underlying publicly issued residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1, 2006 by Aurora Loan Services, LLC, on which escrow payments were disbursed in 2006 (the Platform), specifically Item 1 122(d)(4)(xi), only as it relates to: (1) processing the obligor's hazard insurance information the Company receives; (2) providing Aurora Loan Services, LLC with the applicable hazard insurance effective date, payment amount, and payee (collectively, InsuranceInfonnation); (3) providing the Insurance Information to Aurora Loan Services, LLC no later than 5 days prior to the applicable expiration date as indicated in the Insurance Information; and (4) disbursing escrowed insurance payments to insurance carriers on or before the applicable expiration date, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that no other servicing criteria are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. Schedule A to the Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria lists the individual loans identified by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criterion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ KPMG LLPLos Angeles, California February 28, 2007Ernst & Young Logo**Ernst & Young****LLP**220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509Phone: (612) 343-1000www.ey.com0703-0810453A Member Practice of Ernst & Young GlobalReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report onAssessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation B Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association(the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the CorporateTrust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii) and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xiv),which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the  servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Ourexamination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions andsecurities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our  procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for theyear endedDecember 31, 2006,forthe Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects./s/ Ernst & Young LLPFebruary 26, 2007Exhibit 34 i)