alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT



(EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN)





AGREEMENT, made this March 1, 2002, by and between Jerry Kieliszak (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"), and Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation with its principal offices at 5 Hub Drive, Melville, New York 11747.



WHEREAS, the Trustee has agreed to provide his service to the Chyron Corp. Employee's Pension Plan, (the "Plan") provided that Chyron Corporation (the "Company") agrees to indemnify and hold it harmless for certain actions or inactions as Trustee; and



WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee for certain actions or inactions as Trustee.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



1.	To the maximum extent permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and by other applicable Federal or state law, the Trustee shall not be liable for (either jointly or severally), and the Company shall indemnify the Trustee against, and agree to hold the Trustee harmless from, any and all liabilities and claims (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against such liabilities and claims) against the Trustee arising from any action or inaction of the Trustee with respect to the Plan, unless such liability or expense results from grossly negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by the Trustee.  The foregoing indemnification also shall apply to all liabilities and claims against the Trustee arising from any breach of fiduciary responsibility by fiduciaries other than Trustee, unless the Trustee participates knowingly in such breach, or has actual knowledge of such breach and fails to take reasonable remedial action to remedy such breach.  The Trustee shall be entitled to collect on the Company's indemnity under this Agreement only from the Company and shall not be entitled to payment directly or indirectly from the Plan.



2.	The Trustee shall give the Company prompt written notice of any asserted or potential claim by any party with respect to which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.  The Company shall have the right to defend and control the nature of any action or defense to any such claim or demand which may be asserted against the Trustee for which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and executed this Agreement, effective March 1, 2002.



| |     | CHYRON CORPORATION          
| | --- | ----------------------------
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| | By: | /s/ Robert S. Matlin        
| |     | Name: Robert S. Matlin, Esq.
| |     | Title:   Secretary          
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| |     | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak         
| |     | Name: Jerry Kieliszak       
| |     |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6668

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

v.

RAPHAEL MENDEZ,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:91-hc-00350-BR)

Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL 

MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Robert Jack Dodson, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina; David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North 

Carolina; Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States 

Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s orders 

denying his motion for free copies of his Annual Supervision 

Reports and denying his motion for a transfer. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United 

States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 65 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require States to provide 

for same day registration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Ms. BROWNLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require 

States to provide for same day registration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Same Day Registration 

5 Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Help America 

8 Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating sections 304 and 305 as 

10 sections 305 and 306, respectively; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 65 IH

1 (2) by inserting after section 303 the following 

2 new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 304. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

5 ‘‘(1) REGISTRATION.—Notwithstanding section 

6 8(a)(1)(D) of the National Voter Registration Act of 

7 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20507(a)(1)(D)), each State shall 

8 permit any eligible individual on the day of a Fed9 eral election and on any day when voting, including 

10 early voting, is permitted for a Federal election— 

11 ‘‘(A) to register to vote in such election at 

12 the polling place using a form that meets the 

13 requirements under section 9(b) of the National 

14 Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the indi15 vidual is already registered to vote, to revise 

16 any of the individual’s voter registration infor17 mation); and 

18 ‘‘(B) to cast a vote in such election. 

19 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The requirements under 

20 paragraph (1) shall not apply to a State in which, 

21 under a State law in effect continuously on and after 

22 the date of the enactment of this section, there is no 

23 voter registration requirement for individuals in the 

24 State with respect to elections for Federal office. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 65 IH

1 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of this 

2 section, the term ‘eligible individual’ means, with respect 

3 to any election for Federal office, an individual who is oth4 erwise qualified to vote in that election. 

5 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Each State shall be re6 quired to comply with the requirements of subsection (a) 

7 for the regularly scheduled general election for Federal of8 fice occurring in November 2022 and for any subsequent 

9 election for Federal office.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT RELATING TO EN11 FORCEMENT.—Section 401 of such Act (52 U.S.C. 21111) 

12 is amended by striking ‘‘and 303’’ and inserting ‘‘303, and 

13 304’’. 

14 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

15 of such Act is amended— 

16 (1) by redesignating the items relating to sec17 tions 304 and 305 as relating to sections 305 and 

18 306, respectively; and 

19 (2) by inserting after the item relating to sec20 tion 303 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 304. Same day registration.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Henry F. OWSLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John STILLET, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 20298.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 22, 1954.

Miazza & Drury, J. F. Caraway, New Orleans, for appellant.

Richard S. McBride, Jr., New Orleans, for appellee.

REGAN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Henry F. Owsley, Jr., instituted this suit against the defendant, John Stillet, endeavoring to recover' the sum of $125:67, representing property damages incurred by him on August 14, 1952, at approximately 2:20 p. m., in St. Charles Avenue, when his car was struck by defendant’s vehicle as he attempted- to back into a metered parking space.

Defendant answered and admitted the occurrence of the accident, but denied that he was guilty of any negligence in relation thereto and, in the alternative, pleaded the contributory negligence of the plaintiff.

From a judgment dismissing, plaintiff’s suit he has prosecuted this appeal.

There were no witnesses to the accident other than the ■ operators of the respective vehicles.

"Plaintiff related that he was in the process of backing his car into a metered parking *41area in St. Charles Avenue and when it was on a forty-five degree ángle-, the rear thereof was struck by the véhicle of defendant, who was attempting to nose the front thereof into this, same area. ■ ■ '

Defendant’s version is in irreconcilable conflict with that of the plaintiff. Defendant related that he had completely parked his vehicle in this, metered area when plaintiff backed his automobile into his car.

Obviously only a question of fact is posed for our consideration. We are of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by indulging in a laborious discussion of the conflicting testimony or endeavoring to reconcile the respective litigants’ version of the accident. The trial court accepted the defendant’s version thereof and our analysis of the record reveals no reversible error.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

JANVIER, J.,'absent.
#### DAVIS v. BOYCE, Sheriff.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

July 2, 1936.

H. A. Henderson, of St. Augustine, and John J. Henderson, for petitioner.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BUFORD, Justice.

This case is before us on motion to discharge' the petitioner, the return of the respondent notwithstanding.

Habeas corpus proceedings were instituted by original petition in this court.

The sole question presented is whether or not chapter 16043, Laws 1933, effectively superseded or suspended the operation of section 5787, R.G.S., section 8017, C. G.L., prohibiting any one to hunt, chase, kill, molest, or have in their possession any wild deer between February 15th and the 20th qf November in each year.

Chapter 16043, Acts 1933, purported to permit one to hunt, shoot, kill, and take buck deer on Fridays and Saturdays between June 15th and August 15th of each year in counties having a population of not less than 18,100 and not more than 18,700, according to the federal census of 1930.

The classification adopted in this act was of the same force and effect as if, instead of prescribing that the act should apply to counties having not less than 18,100 population and not more than 18,700 population, *370it had provided that it should apply only to St. Johns county, because the classification was limited to those counties having the stated population according to the population of 1930, and only St. Johns county could at any time be affected by the provisions of the act.

It therefore follows that the judgment in this case is ruled by the opinion and judgment in the case of Harrison v. Wilson, 120 Fla. 771, 163 So. 233. Upon authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, the motion to discharge the petitioner, the return notwithstanding, is denied, and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

So ordered.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
**EXHIBIT 32(a)****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Sherrill Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the“Company”), certify, that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedDecember 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Sherrill Stone Sherrill Stone    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    Date: February 14, 2006  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Powell
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Don
R. Madison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:    August 29, 2003                        /s/ DON R. MADISON
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Don R. Madison
                                                Vice President and Chief
                                                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF J. C.
PENNEY FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF MAY 1, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,217
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,217
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (16)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     16
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 10
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Mary E. Bickel, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

February 7, 1956.

*John B. McDonald*for petitioner.

*Lott & Livingston*for F. Paul Weiss and others, respondents.

Maximilian Moss, S.

Testatrix executed her holographic will on October 5,1933 and died on May 23,1954. Under it she gave a mortgage, the principal of which is $4,000, to be divided at its maturity among three persons; the interest “to be sent ” to a religions association. Testatrix then provided “ the cash in bank, after all debts and obligations have been met, to be divided equally among the following,” then follow the names of six persons, all of whom were children of a predeceased uncle, and were testatrix’ maternal first cousins. Three of them predeceased testatrix. The next disposition is of “ The remainder of my estate, personal, including jewelry and household effects to ” the nominated executor.

The only other asset of which testatrix died possessed is money in the bank. It is clear from her will that even if there were in fact assets other than the mortgage and such money, the money in the bank was to be the source from which ‘ ‘ all debts and obligations” were to be paid, and that embraced within such phrase testatrix contemplated and intended all her debts, funeral and administration expenses and the court so finds. The *543balance of the bank money is then divisible into six equal parts, three of which lapse and fall into the residuary estate as there is not present in the will either words characterizing the legatees’ relationship or survivorship, indicating a class gift to them *(Matter of Forde,*201 Misc. 198, affd. 281 App. Div. 680) and section 29 of the Decedent Estate Law is inapplicable. Submit decree accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>       This schedule contains summary financial information
               extracted from the Liquidating Trust's statement of net
               assets in liquidation at March 31, 1998 and the Liquidating
               Trust's statement of changes in net assets in liquidation
               for the three months ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified
               in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           136,409
<SECURITIES>                                     123,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   259,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             52,452
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                       207,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     259,786
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,855
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (5,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (5,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (5,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.10)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32(b) CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) I, Richard L. Travis, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report. /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.Richard L. Travis, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 14, 2004