alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Don ATCHER, Appellant, v. KENTUCKY STATE POLICE and Workmen’s Compensation Board, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 23, 1972.

John W. Bland, Jr., Hatcher, Lewis & Bland, Elizabethtown, for appellant.

James M. Graves, William P. Swain, and Larry L. Johnson, Boehl, Stopher, Graves & Deindoerfer, Louisville, for appellees.

STEINFELD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Don Atcher claimed compensation for permanent partial disability under the Workmen’s Compensation law. KRS 342.110. The Board denied benefits and its decision was upheld on an appeal to the circuit court, from which judgment this appeal was taken. We affirm.

While appellant Atcher was engaged in the performance of his duties as a Kentucky State Police Officer, he was struck by shotgun pellets. The surgeon was unable to remove all of the pellets and a few are permanently lodged in his tissues. Atcher returned to his employment where his compensation at the time of the hearing before the Workmen’s Compensation Board was greater than that which he was receiving when he was injured. He, his superior officer and the physicians testified that Atcher’s activities as a police officer are not impaired by the imbedded pellets. One physician stated that the officer had sustained a 10-15 percent functional disability to the body as a whole, while the other estimated Atcher’s functional disability to the body as a whole at 5 percent.

Atcher argues that under Osborne v. Johnson, Ky., 432 S.W.2d 800 (1968), as *117construed by Hawkins Brothers Coal Company v. Thacker, Ky., 468 S.W.2d 256 (1971), and Island Creek Coal Company v. Taylor, Ky., 468 S.W.2d 318 (1971), the uncontradicted evidence showing the existence of a permanent disability required the Board to make an allowance to the workman.

The question is whether the evidence required the Board to find that Atcher had sustained a permanent bodily injury of appreciable proportions. Osborne v. Johnson, supra; Codell Construction Co. v. Dixon, Ky., 478 S.W.2d 703 (1972.) Codell teaches that the Board was authorized to accept the testimony of the physician who rated the functional disability at 5 percent and to disregard the appraisal of the other physician.

The total circumstances revealed by the evidence convince us that the Board was not required to find that Atcher had sustained a permanent bodily injury of substantial or significant proportions. Harry Gordon Scrap Materials, Inc. v. Davis, Ky., 478 S.W.2d 731 (1972.)

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Mark W. Simon, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

         1.       The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended
                  June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 9, 2004

                                           /s/ Mark W. Simon
                                           -----------------------------
                                               Mark W.  Simon
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW159737]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Sun Cal Energy, Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease WYW159737 for land in Sublette County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW159737 effective February 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Pamela J. Lewis,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. E8-19949 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
<PAGE>
 
                            SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
             1995 PINKERTON PERFORMANCE AND EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



     The 1995 Pinkerton Performance and Equity Incentive Plan is hereby amended 
by deleting it its entirety Section 7(a) thereof and substituting the following 
in lieu therefor:

     "(a) Automatic Stock Option Grants to Non-Employee Directors.
          --------------------------------------------------------
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, each Non-Employee Director 
shall receive on the day of each annual stockholders meeting of the Company 
during the term of the Plan, a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase 4,500 
shares of Common Stock provided that the Non-Employee Director continues in 
office after such annual meeting.  Each such Non-Qualified Stock Option shall 
have a term of ten years and shall not be exercisable unless the holder thereof 
shall have continued in office until the business day immediately preceding the
date of the following year's annual stockholders meeting. Except as provided in
Section 13 of the Plan, no Stock Option may be exercised by a Non-Employee
Director unless the holder thereof is at the time of such exercise a member of
the Board and has been continuously a member of the Board since the date such
Non-Qualified Stock Option was granted. The price per share of Common Stock to
be paid by the Non-Employee Director shall equal the Fair Market Value of one
share of Common Stock on the date the Non-Qualified Option is granted and the
purchase price of the shares of Common Stock as to which such an option is
exercised shall be paid only in cash."

     IN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned authorized officer of Pinkerton's, Inc.
certifies that the foregoing Amendment has been duly approved and adopted by the
Board of Directors on April 30, 1998.



                                         PINKERTON'S, INC.                  
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                         By:  /s/ C. Michael Carter        
                                             -------------------------     
                                         C. Michael Carter                 
                                         Executive Vice President, General 
                                         Counsel and Corporate Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the February
27, 1999, financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                            3967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     374908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                405810
<PP&E>                                          379341
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (39591)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  770374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           173520
<BONDS>                                         390707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      151273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    770374
<SALES>                                         391873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                392218
<CGS>                                           285939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   285939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7826)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9960)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








I n
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nature Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





**Nature
                Vision, Inc.**Date:
                May 15, 2007
            By:/s/Jeffrey
                P. ZernovJeffrey
                P. ZernovChief
                Executive Officer and President(principal
                executive officer)Date:
                May 15, 2007
            By:/s/Michael
                R. DayMichael
                R. DayChief
                Financial Officer(principal
                financial officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nature Vision, Inc. and will be retained by Nature Vision, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### SENTELL v. TEXAS & P. RY. CO. *

No. 4408.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 6, 1933.

See, also, 146 So. 352.

L. Percy Garrot, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Wise, Randolph, Rendall & Freyer, of Shreveport, for appellee.

*

 Rehearing denied April 28, 1933.

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant for the damage done cotton loaded on cars of defendant, spotted at plaintiff’s gin. An exception of no cause or right of action was filed by defendant, based on the failure of the petition to allege a legal delivery of the cotton to defendant. The exception of no cause of action alone was sustained, which in effect overrules the exception of no right of action.

After the dismissal of this action, plaintiff filed a second suit supplementing the allegations of the first petition by adding aver-ments to the effect that custom between the parties, under the circumstances of the transaction, constituted a delivery. This was met by a plea of res judicata based on the judgment dismissing the first suit on exception of no cause of action. The plea was sustained, and the suit dismissed. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.

A judgment dismissing a suit on an exception of no cause of action, because of insufficient allegations, is in effect a judgment of nonsuit and cannot form the basis of a plea of res judicata. Laenger v. Laenger, 138 La. 532, 70 So. 501; Banahan v. Svarva, 146 La. 906, 84 So. 200; Ducre v. Milner, 169 La. 819, 126 So. 72.

Subsequent to the filing of the plea of res judicata, but before it was passed upon, defendant filed a plea of lis pendens based upon the existence of the first suit referred to above. This plea is drawn strictly in the alternative and relief is prayed for under it only in the event the plea of res judicata is not sustained.

After rendering and signing the judgment dismissing this action on the plea of res judi-cata, the lower court went ahead and rendered and signed a judgment sustaining the plea of lis pendens, and again dismissed the suit. From this judgment plaintiff also appealed.

This second judgment is a nullity for the reason that the suit already having been dismissed, the court was without power to render it.

The judgment sustaining the plea of lis pendens and dismissing plaintiff’s suit is decreed a nullity and of no force and effect.

The judgment sustaining the plea of res judicata and dismissing plaintiff’s suit is reversed, and the case remanded to be proceeded with according to law.
| Date: May 9, 2012 | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak                               |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|              | Jerry Kieliszak                                   |
|              | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029389
<NAME> QUALINK INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                       996
<INVENTORY>                                     48,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,168
<PP&E>                                          89,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,829)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 13F

                               Form 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1999

Check here if Amendment [    ]; Amendment Number: ____
    This Amendment (Check only one.): [    ] is a restatement.
                                      [    ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:      Salomon International Limited
Address:   Victoria Plaza, 111 Buckingham Road
           London, England SW1W OSB

Form 13F File Number:              28-7566

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom
it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized
to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and
complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form.

Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:      Royce Miller
Title:     Company Secretary
Phone:     011.44.171.721.2026

Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:

/s/ Royce Miller                London, England       August 16, 1999
----------------

Report Type (Check only one.):

[   ] 13F  HOLDINGS  REPORT.   (Check  here  if  all  holdings  of  this
      reporting manager are reported in this report.)

[ X ] 13F NOTICE. (Check here if no holdings reported are in this report,
      and all holdings are reported by other reporting manager(s).)

[   ] 13F COMBINATION REPORT. (Check here if a portion of the holdings for
      this reporting manager are reported in this report and a portion are
      reported by other reporting manager(s).)

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

Form 13F File Number 28-2427
Name:  Citigroup Inc.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Orient Paper, Inc.


Science Park


Nanhuan Road


Xushui County


Hebei Province 072550


China








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-150394) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-163340) of Orient Paper, Inc (the “Company”) of our reports dated September 26, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.











/s/ BDO Limited


Hong Kong, September 26, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         1,496,098
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,377,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15,000
<INVENTORY>                                    27,703,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33,304,669
<PP&E>                                         5,313,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,360,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,052,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,425,085
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       202,387
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,625,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,052,630
<SALES>                                        15,474,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,670,771
<CGS>                                          10,353,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,380,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             74,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,258,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                   478,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   780,587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .08
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Joseph Lake, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Queens County,

March 14, 1956.

*George D. Cohen*for petitioner.

*George W. Herz*for public administrator, Queens County.

*Charles H. Ellner,*special guardian for unknown heirs and distributees.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General.*

Anthony P. Savarese, S.

In this nonjury contested probate proceeding, the Surrogate finds upon the evidence that the propounded instrument was executed in duplicate, that both counterparts have been produced and filed, and that the requirements of section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law, relative to the execution of a will, were complied with. The evidence further establishes that the testator, at the time of the execution, was of sound mind and competent to make a will. The testimony of the attorney, who prepared the instrument, supervised its execution and acted as a witness thereto, satisfies the Surrogate that the name of the petitioner was inserted in paragraph “ Fourth “ Fifth ” and “ Sixth ” prior to execution. Neither objector sustained his affirmative allegation that the execution of the instrument was the result of fraud or undue influence. Their objections are dismissed and probate is granted. Submit decree accordingly on notice.