alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 655 

To amend the Helium Act to ensure continued access to helium for holders 

of Federal research grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Helium Act to ensure continued access to 

helium for holders of Federal research grants, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Helium for 

5 Science Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SALE OF CRUDE HELIUM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6 of the Helium Act (50 

8 U.S.C. 167d) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (d)— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 655 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘(e)’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘(f)’’; 

3 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘(e)’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘(f)’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(5) RESPONSIBILITIES OF PURCHASER.—The 

7 Secretary may not sell the Federal Helium Reserve 

8 unless the purchaser agrees to be subject to the 

9 same requirements as the Secretary under sub10 section (e), except that such requirements shall not 

11 terminate until the end of the 8-year period de12 scribed in subsection (e)(1).’’; 

13 (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

14 subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and 

15 (3) by inserting the following after subsection 

16 (d): 

17 ‘‘(e) PHASE E: CONTINUED ACCESS FOR RESEARCH18 ERS.— 

19 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para20 graph (3), during the 8-year period beginning on the 

21 earlier of September 30, 2022, or the date on which 

22 the Secretary ends sales of helium under subsection 

23 (c), the Secretary shall offer crude helium for sale 

24 to holders of a Federal research grant in quantities 

25 not to exceed 30 million cubic feet of crude helium 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 655 IH

1 annually, at such times and under such terms and 

2 conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate. 

3 ‘‘(2) PRICE.— 

4 ‘‘(A) FIRST YEAR.—During the 1-year pe5 riod beginning on the date of the first sale of 

6 helium under paragraph (1), the price of helium 

7 sold under such paragraph shall be 5 percent 

8 higher than the price of the most recent sale of 

9 helium under subsection (c). 

10 ‘‘(B) SUBSEQUENT YEARS.—The Secretary 

11 shall increase the price of helium offered under 

12 this paragraph by 5 percent in each subsequent 

13 year in which sales occur under this subsection. 

14 ‘‘(3) TERMINATION.—The requirements of this 

15 subsection shall not apply to the Secretary beginning 

16 on the date that a purchaser of the Federal Helium 

17 Reserve that has agreed to be subject to the require18 ments of this subsection assumes control of such 

19 Federal Helium Reserve.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3(c) of the 

21 Helium Act (50 U.S.C. 167a(c)) is amended by striking 

22 ‘‘6(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘6(f)’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phreadz, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gordon Samson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.





By:
              /s/
      Gordon SamsonChief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
#### John S. FANT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Valentine DEVILLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 5238.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 30, 1936.

A. V. Hundley, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Gus A. Voltz, of Alexandria, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case to suit No. 5239, decided by us this day. It involves-the same issues - and was handled below in. the same manner as No. 5239 (John S. Fant v. I. W. Miller, 170 So. 412), and for the reasons given in that case, the judg*416ment of the lower court is set aside and the case remanded to be tried in accordance with the law.
#### Betty M. SAMUEL, Appellant, v. MARY, Inc., a Florida corporation, trading and doing business as McGinnis Restaurant of Sheepshead Bay, Long Island, and Imelda Haggerty, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

June 8, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn-Pacific  Corp., on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,  Rose
Fischer,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Accounting  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: August 16, 2005


/s/ Rose Fischer
Rose Fischer
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 ARC
DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. 
 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

In accordance with Section 19(b) of the ARC Document Solutions, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby
amended as follows, effective upon approval by the stockholders at the annual meeting on May 1, 2014: 
 Section 5(a) of the Plan
is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 (a) “(a) Basic Limitation. 

Shares offered under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued Shares or treasury Shares. The aggregate number of Shares authorized for
issuance as Awards under the Plan shall not exceed the sum of (x) 2,720,327 Shares, plus (y) the sum of the number of Shares subject to outstanding awards under the Company’s 2005 Stock Plan (the “Predecessor Plan”) on the
Effective Date that are subsequently forfeited or terminated for any reason before being exercised or settled, plus the number of Shares subject to vesting restrictions under the Predecessor Plan on the Effective Date that are subsequently
forfeited, plus the number of reserved Shares not issued or subject to outstanding grants under the Predecessor Plan on the Effective Date, in an aggregate amount not to exceed 3,500,000 Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the number of
Shares that may be delivered in the aggregate pursuant to Restricted Shares and Stock Units awarded under the Plan shall not exceed 1,000,000 Shares, and (ii) the number of Shares that may be delivered in the aggregate pursuant to the exercise
of ISOs granted under the Plan shall not exceed 3,500,000 Shares plus, to the extent allowable under Section 422 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, any Shares that become available for issuance under the Plan
pursuant to Section 5(c). The limitations of this Section 5(a) shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 12. The number of Shares that are subject to Awards outstanding at any time under the Plan shall not exceed the number
of Shares which then remain available for issuance under the Plan. The Company shall at all times reserve and keep available sufficient Shares to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.” 

To record the amendment of the Plan, ARC Document Solutions, Inc. has executed this document this 18th day of April, 2014. 
  

			
	ARC Document Solutions, Inc.
		
	By:	 	/John E.D. Toth/
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13117-000]


Forest County Hydroelectric Corporation; Notice of Competing 
Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting 
Comments and Motions To Intervene

August 21, 2008.
    On February 13, 2008, Forest County Hydroelectric Corporation filed 
an application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Tionesta Dam Project, to be 
located on Tionesta Creek in Forest County, Pennsylvania. It would use 
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Tionesta Dam.
    The proposed Tionesta Dam Project consists of: (1) Two proposed 15-
foot-long, 36-inch-diameter steel penstocks and one proposed 1800-foot-
long, 8-inch-diameter steel penstock, (2) two proposed powerhouse 
containing three generating units having a total installed capacity of 
519 kilowatts, (3) a proposed 1,500-foot-long transmission line, and 
(4) appurtenant facilities. The proposed, project would have an average 
annual generation of 3.96 megawatt-hours and be sold to a local 
utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Richard Schall, Forest County Hydroelectric 
Corporation, HC2, Box 23, Tionesta, PA 16353, phone (800) 541-2378.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.
    Competing Application: This application competes with Project No. 
12897-000 filed July 30, 2007. Competing applications must be filed on 
or before January 15, 2008.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene: 60 days from 
the issuance of this notice. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of 
intent, and competing applications may be filed electronically via the 
Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be 
filed electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an 
original and eight copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, 
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. For more information on how to submit these types 
of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project 
can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the 
docket number (P-13117) in the docket number field to access the 
document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19935 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perini Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth R. Burk, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date:  May 8, 2009 | /s/Kenneth R. Burk                                   |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Kenneth R. Burk                                      |
|               | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Perini Corporation and will be retained by Perini Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
                FROM THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT JUNE 30,  1997 AND THE
                RELATED CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR
                THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 OF PHELPS  DODGE  CORPORATION
                AND  ITS  SUBSIDIARIES  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
                REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000       
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1 
<CASH>                                              352,100 
<SECURITIES>                                              0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       515,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0 
<INVENTORY>                                         308,100 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,354,700 
<PP&E>                                            3,163,900 
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,943,600 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               842,400 
<BONDS>                                             602,800 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0 
<PREFERRED>                                               0 
<COMMON>                                            382,100 
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,252,800 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,943,600 
<SALES>                                           2,086,700 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,086,700 
<CGS>                                             1,438,800 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,438,800 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    182,300 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   26,600 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     395,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        122,400 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 272,300 
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        272,300 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          4.28 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          4.28        
                                                    

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-042
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
OF J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JULY 31, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             377
<SECURITIES>                                       325
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                        96
<INVENTORY>                                      6,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,306
<PP&E>                                           8,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,381
<BONDS>                                          6,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        457
<COMMON>                                         3,232
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,060
<SALES>                                         14,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,878
<CGS>                                           10,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    327
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                206
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       206
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4391.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Chiege Ojugo Kalu Okwara, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. *653Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Karen E. Eady, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Andre Williams pled guilty to bank robbery. On appeal, he contends that the Government breached his plea agreement by implicitly arguing for application of the career offender sentencing enhancement and that the district court improperly determined that he was a career offender. We affirm.

First, when the issue of a breached plea agreement is raised for the first time on appeal, it is reviewed for plain error. *United States v. McQueen,*108 F.3d 64, 65-66 (4th Cir.1997). We have reviewed the record and find no plain error. The plea agreement explicitly recognized the possibility of application of the career offender enhancement, and the Government’s motion for a downward departure based on the district court’s determination that the enhancement applied did not violate any obligations under the plea agreement.

Second, to qualify as a career offender, a defendant must have at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. *United States v. Huggins,*191 F.3d 532, 539 (4th Cir.1999). Williams argues that his prior convictions, which were separated by intervening arrests, nevertheless constitute a single related conviction for sentencing purposes because they were consolidated for sentencing. *See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 4Al.l(a)(2) (2000). However, because there were intervening arrests between these convictions, *see*USSG § 4A1.2, comment, (n.3), the convictions cannot be counted as related offenses. *See Huggins,*191 F.3d at 539. Accordingly, there was no error in the district court’s classification of Williams as a career offender.

Thus, we affirm Williams’ conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*