alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6761 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require certain Tennessee 

Valley Authority employees to include their annual salary in annual 

disclosure reports, and for the other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Mr. BURCHETT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require 

certain Tennessee Valley Authority employees to include 

their annual salary in annual disclosure reports, and 

for the other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANNUAL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT. 

4 Section 102(a) of the Ethics in Government Act of 

5 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 102(a)) is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(9) In the case of an individual occupying a 

8 position described under section 101(f) within the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6761 IH

1 Tennessee Valley Authority, the total compensation 

2 (including annual rate of basic pay, bonuses, allow3 ances, differentials, and benefits) for such position.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6743 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6743

 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to increase 
                the reimbursement rate of school meals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2022

 Mr. McGovern introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to increase 
                the reimbursement rate of school meals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Level Up Nutrition for CHildren in 
Every School Act of 2022'' or the ``LUNCHES Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE REIMBURSEMENT RATE OF SCHOOL MEALS.

    Section 4(b)(2) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1753(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``10.5 cents'' and 
inserting ``59.5 cents''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6689 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal certain employee protective 

arrangements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. PERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to repeal certain 

employee protective arrangements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE AR4 RANGEMENTS. 

5 Subsection (b) of section 5333 of title 49, United 

6 States Code, is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 21.1**

**BUCKEYEGP HOLDINGS L.P.SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTAS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006**

| **Subsidiary**                         | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Organization** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
| Buckeye GP LLC                         |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Partners, L.P.                 |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Pipe Line  Company, L.P.       |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Pipe Line  Holdings, L.P.      |       | Delaware   |
| Everglades Pipe Line  Company, L.P.    |       | Delaware   |
| Laurel Pipe Line  Company, L.P.        |       | Delaware   |
| Wood River Pipe Lines  LLC             |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Pipe Line  Transportation LLC  |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye NGL Pipe Lines  LLC            |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Terminals, LLC                 |       | Delaware   |
| Norco Pipe Line Company,  LLC          |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Gulf Coast Pipe  Lines, L.P.   |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Gulf Coast  Holdings I, LLC    |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Gulf Coast  Holdings II, LLC   |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Products Pipe  Line, L.P.      |       | Delaware   |
| Buckeye Texas Pipe Line  Company, L.P. |       | Delaware   |
| Gulf Coast Pipe Line,  L.P.            |       | Delaware   |
| Gulf Coast/Products GP  Holding LLC    |       | Delaware   |
| Gulf Coast/Products  Holding L.P.      |       | Delaware   |
| Ferrysburg Terminal LLC  .             |       | Delaware   |
| MainLine GP, Inc.                 |       | Delaware   |
| MainLine L.P.                          |       | Delaware   |
| WesPac Pipelines—San  Diego LLC   |       | Nevada     |
| WesPac Pipelines—Reno  LLC        |       | Nevada     |
| WesPac Pipelines—Austin  LLC      |       | Nevada     |
| WesPac Pipelines—Memphis  LLC     |       | Nevada     |
| WesPac Pipelines—San  Jose LLC    |       | Nevada     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance  sheet and the  consolidated  statement of income filed as
part of the report on Form 10-KSB and is qualified  in its entirety by reference
to such report on Form 10-KSB.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                        0000915127
<NAME>                         PHC, Inc
<MULTIPLIER>                          1
<CURRENCY>                           US
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>               JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                   1.000
<CASH>                          227,077
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                11,615,001
<ALLOWANCES>                  3,488,029
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              8,532,173
<PP&E>                        3,032,925
<DEPRECIATION>                  904,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               17,099,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         8,330,177
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                          10
<COMMON>                         56,626
<OTHER-SE>                    4,360,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 17,099,968
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             21,246,189
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                24,199,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,438,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>              3,684,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,289,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (3,792,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                    219,239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (4,011,925)
<DISCONTINUED>               (2,220,296)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                 (6,232,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (1.19)
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoOum Corp.(the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2016, I, Ronald Vega, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   October 5, 2016

SoOum Corp.



By: /s/ Ronald Vega

Ronald Vega
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-1267

___________

Jeffrey Bowman, also known as *

Jeffery Bowman, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Michael Bowersox; Jeff Norman; Joe *

Hoffmeister; Correctional Medical * [UNPUBLISHED]

Services; Dr. Elizabeth J. Conley; J. *

Cofield; Dr. Jihad Ibrahim; Dr. *

Vermilyea; Dr. Hauenstein; Renee *

Todaro; Wanda Laramore; Edie *

McDaniel, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 11, 2012

Filed: April 16, 2012

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this interlocutory appeal, Jeffrey Bowman challenges two district court

orders that granted a defendant’s motion for leave to answer the complaint out of time,

and denied Bowman’s motion to compel discovery, his motion for default judgment,

his motion to reconsider his motion to compel, and his motion for appointment of
counsel. We grant Bowman leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See

Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483-85 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam).

We have jurisdiction to review only the ruling denying the motion for

appointment of counsel. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291-1292 (granting jurisdiction over

appeals from final decisions, specified interlocutory decisions, and certified

controlling legal questions); Tenkku v. Normandy Bank, 218 F.3d 926, 928 (8th Cir.

2000) (collateral-order doctrine allows interlocutory appeal when appealed decision

conclusively determined disputed question, resolved important issue completely

separate from merits, and is effectively unreviewable on appeal from final judgment);

Slaughter v. City of Maplewood, 731 F.2d 587, 588-89 (8th Cir. 1984) (denial of

motion for appointment of counsel is immediately appealable in 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action under collateral-order doctrine). We are to review the denial of counsel for

abuse of discretion, see Reynolds v. Dormire, 636 F.3d 976, 978 n.2 (8th Cir. 2011),

but here the district court did not explain why it denied Bowman’s motion, see Sours

v. Norris, 782 F.2d 106, 107 (8th Cir. 1986) (district court must provide enough

reasoning for denying counsel motion to allow court of appeals to determine whether

it abused its discretion).

Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of obtaining the district court’s

reasons for denying Bowman’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we retain

jurisdiction so that we may then make our determination. See Slaughter, 731 F.2d at

590 & n.2.

______________________________

-2-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alicia PRATT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-4190.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2003.

Decided Aug. 6, 2003.

Jacqueline A. Hallinan, Hallinan Law Offices, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Travis N. Gery, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Following her guilty plea to one count of aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), Alicia Pratt was sentenced to seventy-eight months in prison. Pratt timely appealed.

Pratt challenges the two-point enhancement imposed pursuant to *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2D1.1(b)(1) (2002), which applies if a firearm was possessed during the commission of the offense. Pratt contends that the enhancement was inappropriate because the firearms found in her apartment and upon which the enhancement were based, belonged to her co-conspirator and were not reasonably foreseeable to her because she had told him not to bring guns into the apartment and she was unaware of their presence. We have held that a defendant may be accountable for firearms possessed by another person involved with her in a joint criminal activity concerning drug trafficking without requiring that the government establish that the defendant knew the weapons were present, because the presence of weapons in this situation is reasonably foreseeable. *United States v. Kimberlin,*18 F.3d 1156, 1160 (4th Cir.1994). Under the circumstances in this case, we find that the district court did not clearly err in imposing the enhancement. *See*
      *223
      *United States v. Harris,*128 F.3d 850, 852 (4th Cir.1997) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm Pratt’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6737-6738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Final Public Meeting for Reclamation's Managing for Excellence 
Project

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is holding a workshop to inform the 
public about the close-out of the Managing for Excellence project. The 
meeting to be held will inform the public about the results of the 
Managing for Excellence action plan and seek final public input and 
feedback.

DATES: February 29, 2008, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESS: Monte Carlo Resort and Casino, 3770 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Las 
Vegas, Nevada 89109.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie Byers at 303-445-2790.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Managing for Excellence--An Action Plan for 
the 21st Century Bureau of Reclamation, outlined a process and 
timeframe for the project which identified and addressed the specific 
21st Century challenges Reclamation must meet to fulfill its mission to 
manage, develop, and protect

[[Page 6738]]

water and related resources in an environmentally and economically 
sound manner in the interest of the American public. The project 
examined Reclamation's core capabilities and the agency's ability to 
respond to both expected and unforeseeable future needs in an 
innovative and timely manner. For more information regarding the 
project, Action Plan, and specific actions being taken, please visit 
the Managing for Excellence Web site at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence.

Registration

    Although you may register the day of the workshop beginning at 12 
p.m., we highly encourage you to register prior to the date of the 
meeting online at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence, or by phone at 303-
445-2935.

    Dated: January 18, 2008.
Kris D. Polly,
Deputy Commissioner--External and Intergovernmental Affairs, Washington 
Office.
 [FR Doc. E8-1995 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
Order entered February 2 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 00988
- CR No. 05
- 12
- 00989
- CR
VICTOR MANUEL CRUZ, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F11
- 25901
- W , F11
- 25902
- W 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On February 15, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief ha d not been filed. On February 20, 2013, we received appellant’s brief, together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeals, we VACATE t he February 15, 2013 order requiring findings.
We GRANT the February 20, 2013 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed

as of the date of this order. /s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### Justin Bernstein, Plaintiff, *v.*Morton Weinberg et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Bronx County,

April 9, 1956.

*David B. Ampel*for plaintiff.

*James A. Doherty*for defendants.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

The rule IV, subd. 5, general preference (Supreme Court Rules, Bronx County) is not opposed, but defendants object to the rule 151 (Rules Civ. Prac.) specific preference.

Plaintiff, 27 years of age, was in an accident on February 25, 1955, when he was struck by an automobile while crossing the street. He was employed by the Department of Welfare at an annual salary of $3,425. The injuries are serious. From the date of the accident until July 15, 1955 he was confined in the hospital; thereafter, until at least October 25, 1955, to bed and home; and medical opinion is that he will be totally incapacitated for a year or two more. The hospital bill is over $2,300 ; the doctor’s bills are anticipated to be about $1,000; and plaintiff asserts that his continued treatment will require an additional $2,000 medical expense. He has no income to support himself and his widowed mother, who has been aiding him, is now unemployed. The small savings that they have will soon be exhausted.

*73Actual public assistance there is not presently, but adequate destitution there is to invoke the exercise of the court’s discretion favorably. The plaintiff should not necessarily be compelled to apply to his employer, the Department of Welfare, for relief.

The motion is granted and the cause is advanced to the Day Calendar of May 10, 1956.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6576 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6576

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the Quality 
Payment Program-Small Practice, Underserved, and Rural Support program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2022

Mr. Welch (for himself and Mr. Burgess) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the Quality 
Payment Program-Small Practice, Underserved, and Rural Support program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Practice, Underserved, and 
Rural Support Program Extension Act of 2022'' or the ``SURS Extension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM-SMALL PRACTICE, 
              UNDERSERVED, AND RURAL SUPPORT PROGRAM.

    The first sentence of section 1848(q)(11)(B) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(q)(11)(B)) is amended by inserting ``and for 
each of fiscal years 2022 through 2027'' before the period.
                                 <all>
```
. -

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS . AUSTIN**t%matroln8 the**  **8bavo** 06&e& portionof tb 8t8tate

**we mid**  **ln 010**  **oplnfoa lb.**  **O-2 y&**  **A:**

If the Cam~lrslomrs~ Court deteminrs that t8a **ut6bl.i.ebmat** awl/or **sgpo~t OS**  **mxah pro**  **P** 

### laotlaunit 

### ikia b.haU af pablh health ml unl~%ion thin tha oean~ tt 10 mar opinionthat it -would **be** 

### mathorlmetl

to expendfto#la **fresths** genrral tam? oftha scanty for tha purpoaa8~aatout ln for lettar.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         244,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,205,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,190,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,665,101
<PP&E>                                       5,671,894
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,797,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,979,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          805,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,393,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,979,526
<SALES>                                      3,548,571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,548,571
<CGS>                                        2,760,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,760,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               709,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 15

May 12, 2003



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 25, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation (the Company) for the
period ended March 31, 2003 and included in the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-67606, 333-61624, 333-43890 and
333-36415), Registration Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-67606, 333-43890, 33-44380 and 333-36415), Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442, 33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012,
2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362, 33-62648, 333-42231, and 333-52175) and the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-8 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (No. 333-86061).

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
**Exhibit 23.2**

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-138175) of Fox ChaseBancorp, Inc. of our report dated August 25, 2005, relating to the consolidatedstatements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows forthe year ended December 31, 2004, which appears in the December 31, 2006 AnnualReport on Form 10-K.
|                          | /s/ Beard Miller Company LLP |
|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                     |                         |
| Beard Miller Company LLP |
| Harrisburg, Pennsylvania |
| March 26, 2007           |

 

----