alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael Shalom, Chief Executive Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2011



/s/ Michael ShalomMichael ShalomChief Executive Officer and President


The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Intcomex, Inc. and will be retained by Intcomex, Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WRL - 2014.03.31 - EX 10.1






           Exhibit 10.1


SECOND Amendment to
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This SECOND Amendment to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of January 2, 2014, (the “Execution Date’) by and between WORLDWIDE WYNN, LLC (“Employer”) and LINDA CHEN ("Employee").  Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Employer and Employee have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated May 12, 2010, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated November 2, 2012 (collectively, the "Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, Employer is willing and Employee desires to modify certain terms and conditions to the Agreement as more fully set forth herein; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Amendment.  The Employer and Employee hereby agree to amend Section 7(g)(ii) of the Agreement in its entirety to read as follows:


“7(g)(ii)    Employee and her immediately family shall have the right to occupy the Macau House during the Term.  Wynn Macau shall provide improvements to the Macau House as approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Employer.”


2.    Effectiveness.  The amendment set forth in Section 1 shall be effective as of the Execution Date.


3.    Other Provisions of Agreement.  The parties acknowledge that the Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first written above.


WORLDWIDE WYNN, LLC                EMPLOYEE


/s/ Matt Maddox                        /s/ Linda C. Chen                          
Matt Maddox                        Linda C. Chen
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6713 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling 

of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2022 

Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to 

the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuous and En5 during Action to Stop Every Overdose Act of 2022’’ or 

6 the ‘‘CEASE Overdose Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6713 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLASS SCHEDULING OF FENTANYL-RELATED SUB2 STANCES. 

3 Section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

4 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended by adding at the end of sched5 ule I the following: 

6 ‘‘(e)(1) Unless specifically exempted or unless listed 

7 in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or 

8 preparation which contains any quantity of a fentanyl-re9 lated substance, or which contains the salts, isomers, and 

10 salts of isomers of a fentanyl-related substance whenever 

11 the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers 

12 is possible within the specific chemical designation. 

13 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), except as pro14 vided in paragraph (3), the term ‘fentanyl-related sub15 stance’ means any substance that is structurally related 

16 to fentanyl by 1 or more of the following modifications: 

17 ‘‘(A) By replacement of the phenyl portion of 

18 the phenethyl group by any monocycle, whether or 

19 not further substituted in or on the monocycle. 

20 ‘‘(B) By substitution in or on the phenethyl 

21 group with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxyl, hydroxyl, halo, 

22 haloalkyl, amino, or nitro groups. 

23 ‘‘(C) By substitution in or on the piperidine 

24 ring with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxyl, ester, ether, 

25 hydroxyl, halo, haloalkyl, amino, or nitro groups. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6713 IH

1 ‘‘(D) By replacement of the aniline ring with 

2 any aromatic monocycle whether or not further sub3 stituted in or on the aromatic monocycle. 

4 ‘‘(E) By replacement of the N–propionyl group 

5 with another acyl group. 

6 ‘‘(3) A substance that satisfies the definition of the 

7 term ‘fentanyl-related substance’ in paragraph (2) shall 

8 nonetheless not be treated as a fentanyl-related substance 

9 subject to this schedule if the substance— 

10 ‘‘(A) is controlled by action of the Attorney 

11 General under section 201; or 

12 ‘‘(B) is otherwise expressly listed in a schedule 

13 other than this schedule.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PCA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-2-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                NOV-1-1998
<CASH>                                       3,425,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,825,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,792,865
<INVENTORY>                                  5,519,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,383,230
<PP&E>                                     124,465,030
<DEPRECIATION>                              71,836,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,783,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,496,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       471,410
<OTHER-SE>                                (124,272,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               152,783,383
<SALES>                                    156,031,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           156,031,866
<CGS>                                      124,254,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              176,499,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (20,467,372)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,339,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (28,806,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (7,403,265)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (21,403,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (21,403,213)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.11)
        

</TABLE>
#### Jim T. NORRIS v. S. E. MICHAUD *&*Union Indemnity Company.

No. 4451.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 5, 1933.

Elder & Elder, of Huston, for appellants.

Redmond & Thompson, of Monroe, for ap-pellee.

DREW, Judge.

This case is a companion case of Miss Lorena Norris v. S. E. Michaud et al., 148 So. 493, decided this day by this court, and, for the reasons assigned therein, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed as to the liability of defendant.

The only remaining question is the amount of damage caused to plaintiff’s car. The only testimony in the record is to the effect that plaintiff’s car was worth $400 before the collision, and, after the wreck, he traded it in on another car for $50, the best available price, thereby leaving a loss to plaintiff of $350, the amount of the award in the lower court, which is correct. However, the judgment of the lower court will have to be amended by substituting the receivers of the Union Indemnity Company for the Union Indemnity Company as parties defendant.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be amended by substituting as parties defendant Clay W. Beckner and S. Sanford Levy, receivers of the Union Indemnity Company, in the stead and place of the Union Indemnity Company, and, as amended, that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                         810,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,829,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,998,000
<INVENTORY>                                 75,772,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           124,280,000
<PP&E>                                      67,640,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,389,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,916,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,492,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 110,366,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               169,916,000
<SALES>                                    184,823,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           184,823,000
<CGS>                                      114,658,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,362,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             172,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,850,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,678,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,172,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,172,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50952-50953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket No. USAF-2008-0010]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 29, 2008.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Air Force Academy Applications, United 
States Air Force Academy Form 149, OMB Number 0701-0087.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 9.850.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 9,850.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 4,925.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain data on candidate's background and aptitude in determining 
eligibility and selection to the Air Force Academy.

[[Page 50953]]

    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Sharon Mar.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Mar at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503. Comments may be e-mail to Ms. Mar at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a59626b78656455476b784a656768246f657a246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b18232a39242514062a390b242629652e243b652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    August 22, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E8-20018 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 866

To make a technical correction to section 601 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1995

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To make a technical correction to section 601 of the Federal

Aviation Administration Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Intrastate Tow Truck

5 Transportation Technical Correction Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11501(h)(2) of title 49,

8 United States Code, is amended as follows:

9 (1) Strike ‘‘and’’ after subparagraph (A).
2

HR 866 IH

1 (2) Strike the period at the end of subpara2 graph (B) and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’.

3 (3) Insert the following new subparagraph at

4 the end thereof:

5 ‘‘(C) does not apply to the authority of a State

6 or its political subdivisions to enact or enforce a law,

7 regulations, or other provision relating to the trans8 portation for hire of a motor vehicle by a tow truck

9 if such transportation is performed—

10 ‘‘(i) at the request of a law enforcement of11 ficer; or

12 ‘‘(ii) without the prior consent or author13 ization of the owner or operator of the motor

14 vehicle.’’

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

16 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend17 ment made by section 601(d) of the Federal Aviation Ad18 ministration Authorization Act of 1994.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029319
   <NAME>  Asset Recovery & Management Corp.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM LANDRUM,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

LAURA SCHWEITZER; STATE OF

ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 08-17771

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00952-JWS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner William Landrum appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for untimeliness. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-17771

Landrum contends that several extraordinary circumstances prevented the

timely filing of his federal habeas petition and that equitable tolling was warranted. 

This argument is waived because it was not properly raised before the district

court. See United States v. Carlson, 900 F.2d 1346, 1349 (9th Cir. 1990). 

Furthermore, Landrum was not entitled to equitable tolling. See Rasberry v.

Garcia, 448 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir.2006) (“[A] pro se petitioner’s lack of legal

sophistication is not, by itself, an extraordinary circumstance warranting equitable

tolling.”). 

AFFIRMED.