U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 When Missing Data are not Missing: A New Approach to Evaluating Supplemental Homicide Report Imputation Strategies
NCJ Number
              225313

Author(s)
          Tim Wadsworth, John M. Roberts Jr.
Date Published

November 2008
Length
              30 pages
Annotation
              This study proposes a new approach for evaluating techniques for imputing missing data in the analysis of data for the Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHR), which are widely used in criminological research.
Abstract
              Scholars have argued convincingly that the problem of missing data in the SHR poses a significant obstacle to research. Although the general focus has been the absence of information pertaining to the relationship between the victim and the offender, some scholars have noted that missing information precludes researchers’ ability to look at race-specific and motive-specific patterns of offending. A common solution to this problem--discarding cases with missing data--can introduce significant bias into quantitative models and should be avoided whenever possible. Although this study does not provide a direct comparison of the strategies for addressing missing data in homicide cases, given their different data requirements, the authors outline what they view as the strengths and weaknesses of the strategies. They generally conclude that imputation strategies that aim to create distributions for cases with unknown values can be useful. In contrast, attempts to impute values for individual cases were problematic; none of the attempts were much more accurate than coding all cases with a missing “victim/offender (v/o) relationship” as acquaintance homicides. Imputation methods have advantages over dropping cases. Still, more research on applications is needed. In the first part of the authors’ analysis, they compared distributions of available variables for the three types of cases: complete in SHR, missing offender and incident information in SHR but known in the police report, and missing offender and incident information in both SHR and the police report. The second part of the analysis applied the four imputation strategies to “incomplete” datasets from the SHR. 8 tables, 28 references, and 1 appendix
      
  
          Additional Details
Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Award
        When Missing Data Are Not Missing: A New Approach to Evaluating SHR Imputation Strategies
    
  
  
Date Published: November 1, 2008
    
          Downloads
        
                      *No download available*

Related Datasets
        
                      http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20060
Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Homicide
        Violent crime
        Research
        Data analysis
        Imputation (statistics)



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Estimating the Impact of Research Practitioner Partnerships on Evidence-based Program Implementation
                  Choosing Where to Fight: Do Social Networks Distinguish American ISIS Foreign Fighters from ISIS-Inspired Terrorists?
                  A field-experiment testing the impact of a warrant service prioritization strategy for police patrol officers
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov