alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 


                                                                  Exhibit 12 (a)
                              J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                            and Consolidated Subsidiaries

         Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Combined Fixed Charges
                       and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement


                                              53 weeks               52 weeks
                                               ended                  ended
                                              Oct. 31,               Oct. 25,
     ($ Millions)                               1998                   1997     
                                            __________            __________

     Income from continuing operations        $     963             $     665
        (before income taxes, before
        capitalized interest, but after
        preferred stock dividend)

     Fixed charges

     Interest (including capitalized
     interest) on:

        Operating leases                            180                   110
        Short term debt                             106                   122
        Long term debt                              555                   473
        Capital leases                                6                     7
        Credit facility                              -                     19
        Other, net                                   -                    (14)
                                              _________             _________ 
     Total fixed charges                            847                   717   

     Preferred stock dividend, before taxes          32                    46

     Combined fixed charges and preferred     _________           ___________
        stock dividend requirement                  879                   763
                                                                                
                                              _________           ___________
     Total available income                   $   1,842           $     1,428
                                              =========           ===========

     Ratio of available income to combined
        fixed charges and preferred stock
        dividend requirement                        2.1                   1.9
                                              =========           ===========



     The interest cost of the LESOP notes guaranteed by the Company is not
     included in fixed charges above.

     The Company believes that, due to the seasonal nature of its business,
     ratios for a period of time other than a 52 or 53 week
     period are inappropriate.
No. 85-168 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1985 

ELDORA J. PORCH, BOBBY RAY TANNER 

and FRANCIS C. CADWELL, 

Plaintiffs and Appellants, 

POWDER RIVER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 

ALVIN =SCHKOW, F.F. HUCKINS, TED FLETCHER, 

Commissioners, 

Defendants and Respondents. 

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District, 

In and for the County of Powder River, 

The Honorable Nat.Allen, Judge presiding. 

COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

For Appellants: 

Anderson, Brown, Gerbase, Cebull & Jones; Joe Gerbase, 

Billings, Montana 

For Respondents: 

Daniel Schwarz, County Attorney, Broadus, Montana 

Submitted on Briefs: Oct. 3, 1985 

Decided: December 30, 1985 

Filed: i%!X 3 0 1985 

Clerk 
Mr. Justice John Conway Harrison delivered the Opinion of the 

Court. 

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the 

Sixteenth Judicial District, in and for the County of Powder 

River, Montana. The District Court denied appellants' 

application for a writ of prohibition against respondents to 

prohibit them from building a swimming pool pursuant to the 

creation of a RSID. 

Prior to Nay 31, 1984, a number of petitions were 

circulated in Powder River County, Montana, for the purpose 

of creating a rural special improvement district (RSID) , 

pursuant to § 7-12-2102, MCA (1983). The commissioners 

executed a resolution of intent to create the RSID and it was 

subsequently created for the purpose of constructing a 

swimming pool. 

The appellants brought this action under an application 

for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the Commissioners from 

building the swimming pool. The sufficiency of the petition 

was challenged on the grounds it did not contain the names of 

the requisite percentage of freeholders within the district. 

A show cause hearing was held and the application was denied. 

The 1985 Legislature amended S 7-12-2102, MCA (1983), 

Sec. 2, Ch. 665, L. 1985. There is no longer the requirement 

of petition of 60% of the freeholders affected for 

establishment of a RSID. The county commissioners have the 

authority, "[wlhenever the public interest or convenience may 

require, to order and create special improvement d.istricts 

outside the limits of incorporated towns and cities . . . " 

The Powder River County Commissioners may proceed with 
establishment of the RSID to build a swimming pool. The 

statutes provide a method of written protest by property 

owners who are liable to be assessed if the district is 

established. The order quashing the writ of prohibition is 

affirmed for the reason the question is moot. 

Justices -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0274; FRL-8381-2]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Agency is issuing this notice to extend a meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Scientific Advisory Panel by one half-day. The meeting, originally scheduled for September 16-18, 2008, was announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         of July 9, 2008 (73 FR 39292) (FRL-8373-5).                    

# DATES:

The meeting will now be held September 16-19, 2008, from approximately 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., eastern standard time, with the meeting concluding by noon Friday, September 19, 2008.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn—Rosslyn at Key Bridge, 1900 North Fort Myer Dr., Arlington, VA 22209; telephone number: (703) 807-2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sharlene R. Matten, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-0130; fax number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail address:                         *matten.sharlene@epa.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    All other information provided in the July 9, 2008                     **Federal Register**                     public meeting notice remains unchanged.                

# List of Subjects

      - Environmental protection
      - Pesticides and pests

Dated: August 25, 2008.

Gary E. Timm,

Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-20122 Filed 8-26-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00511

- CV

Elusive Holdings, Inc. , Appellant

v.

Jacob White, Justin Blackburn, and Kelli Blackburn , Appellee s

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 19

- 005577 , THE HONORA B LE CATHERINE MAUZY , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Elusive Holdings, Inc. has filed an unopposed moti on to dismiss this

appeal. We g rant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 19, 2021
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00038

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF LG, A CHILD,

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02864

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The motion for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-139180) pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan of Susser Holdings Corporation and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-151662) pertaining to the Susser Holdings Corporation 2008Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated March 13, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Susser Holdings Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Susser HoldingsCorporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Antonio, Texas 

March 13, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6868 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6868

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 17), 2022

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for financial 
 assistance to fund certain cybersecurity and infrastructure security 
    education and training programs and initiatives, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cybersecurity Grants for Schools Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION SUPPORT.

    (a) In General.--Section 2220 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 665f) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Grants and Cooperative Agreements.--The Director may award 
financial assistance in the form of grants or cooperative agreements to 
States, local governments, institutions of higher education (as such 
term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1001)), nonprofit organizations, and other non-Federal entities 
as determined appropriate by the Director for the purpose of funding 
cybersecurity and infrastructure security education and training 
programs and initiatives to--
            ``(1) carry out the purposes of CETAP; and
            ``(2) enhance CETAP to address the national shortfall of 
        cybersecurity professionals.''.
    (b) Briefings.--Paragraph (2) of subsection (c) of section 2220 of 
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 665f) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
        subparagraphs (D) and (E) respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(C) information on any grants or cooperative 
                agreements made pursuant to subsection (e), including 
                how any such grants or cooperative agreements are being 
                used to enhance cybersecurity education for underserved 
                populations or communities;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 11


                                    SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                               STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                             <C>          <C>    
                                                                                    QUARTER ENDED                       
                                                                                February 3,  January 28,
                                                                                    1996         1995   
  
NET EARNINGS
  Net Earnings                                                                   $  3,786     $  3,125   
  Preferred stock accretion                                                             -         (549)  

  Add:  Interest savings, net of tax effect, on retirement
          of debt from the proceeds received from the exercise
          of options and warrants in excess of 20% limitation                           -            6

Primary net earnings applicable to common shares                                    3,786        2,582

  Add:  Preferred stock accretion elimination resulting from
          the assumed conversion of preferred stock                                     -          549
                                                                                         
Fully diluted net earnings applicable to common shares                           $  3,786     $  3,131

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                                       23,357        8,681
  Add:  Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options                 
          (in excess of 20% limitation for 1995)                                      954          848
  
Primary weighted average shares outstanding                                        24,311        9,529

  Add:  Shares issuable from assumed conversion of preferred stock                      -       14,275   

  Add:  Additional shares issuable from assumed exercise of options
          (in excess of 20% limitation for 1995) due to the difference
          in the share repurchase price under the fully diluted computation            64            -

Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding                                  24,375       23,804

NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Primary                                                                        $    .16     $    .27

  Fully Diluted                                                                  $    .16     $    .13

</TABLE>
NOTE:   Prior to May 1, 1995, Primary and Fully Diluted Net Earnings Per 
        Common Share were computed using the Modified Treasury Stock Method.
        Due to the 1995 conversion of the Company's Preferred Stockholders,
        the Treasury Stock Method was used to compute Primary and Fully Diluted
        Net Earnings Per Common Share for 1996.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



________________





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  March 8, 2006





CHYRON CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

|New York                                       | 1-9014                   | 11-2117385                          
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

|5 Hub Drive                              |           
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|Melville, New York                       | 11747     
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

---

Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition

On March 8, 2006, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2005.  A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three months and year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits

99.1 Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated March 8, 2006.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

CHYRON CORPORATION

| | By:    | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | Jerry Kieliszak          
| | Title: | Senior Vice President and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer  

|Exhibit No. | Description                        
|----------- | -----------------------------------
|            |                                    
|99.1        | Press Release, dated March 8, 2006.

Date: March 8, 2006
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 8 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00706

- CR

MARVIN CUNNINGHAM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 9

Harris County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 2322259

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to violation of a protective order. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial

court assessed punishment at confinement for ninety days in the Harris County Jail. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court signed a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defend ant has no right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is2

included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports

th e trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). On January 10, 2021 , this cou rt notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response has been received.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices W ise, Poissant and Wilson

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

140028

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140028 COA: 293641 Wayne CC: 08-006214-01-FH JIMMIE CARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Primoris Services Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Primoris Services Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010:

 

·                  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-159491) pertaining to the Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan of Primoris Services Corporation; and

·                  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No 333-161331) pertaining to the registration of 1,737,936 shares of common stock.

 

 

/s/ Moss Adams, LLP

 

Irvine, California

March 16, 2011

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6709 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6709

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to include 
   certain mental health professionals as specialized instructional 
                           support personnel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2022

   Mr. Harder of California introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to include 
   certain mental health professionals as specialized instructional 
                           support personnel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Mental Health in Schools 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIALIZED INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT PERSONNEL.

    Section 8101(47)(A)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(47)(A)(i)) is amended by striking ``and 
school psychologists'' and inserting ``school psychologists, and other 
qualified mental health professionals involved in providing mental 
health services for students, including marriage and family therapists, 
licensed professional clinical counselors, licensed clinical social 
workers, and clinical psychologists (including individuals completing 
supervised postgraduate hours required to become a marriage and family 
therapist, licensed professional clinical counselor, licensed clinical 
social worker, or clinical psychologist)''.
                                 <all>
```