alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*West Hooker et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 6, *1955.*

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (David Clurman*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*L. Ray Glass*for defendants.

*559Joseph A. Gavagan, J.

In an action under article 23-A of the General Business Law (the Martin Act), plaintiff seeks a temporary injunction. It is not denied that defendant corporations and the individual defendant as their president have circulated a stock prospectus to the public which contains a substantial misleading statement as to the money which ‘ ‘ has been raised ”. Nor is it denied that the prospectus includes on a corporate executive board, board of directors, or advisory council the names of certain “ selected industrialists, businessmen and educators ” without their consent and without any intention by them to be affiliated with these enterprises. The name Douglas MacArthur is also listed in connection with a proposed television film without his apparent consent.

The defendants urge that the prospectus is, as captioned, a ‘ ‘ preliminary draft ’ ’ and that they have been and are willing to revise the prospectus and that no public sales have resulted from its circulation.

It is well settled that the purpose of the Martin Act is to prevent all kinds of fraud upon the public arising from the sale of securities. “ The words ‘ fraud ’ and *‘*fraudulent practices ’ in this connection should, therefore, be given a wide meaning so as to include all acts, although not originating in any actual evil design or contrivance to perpetrate fraud or injury upon others, which do by their tendency to deceive or mislead the purchasing public come within the purpose of the law.” *(People*v. *Federated Radio Corp.,*244 N. Y. 33, 38, 39.)

There can be no doubt that the prospectus circulated by the defendants tends to mislead the public. Accordingly the motion for a temporary injunction is granted.

No consideration has been given to certain extraneous matter which, although asserted in both the moving and answering affidavits, is most irrelevant and immaterial on this motion.

Settle order, which may contain a provision for an early trial
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
|-------------------------------------------------
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906               
|OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                

I, Franco Perrotta, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Legend Marketing Corp.
      for the year ended April 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Legend Marketing Corp.                                          

Dated: June 12, 2009

| | /s/
      Franco Perrotta                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Franco Perrotta                                        
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director           
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Legend Marketing
Corp. and will be retained by Legend Marketing Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chyron Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Kieliszak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2008

| | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
| | -------------------------
| | Jerry Kieliszak          
| | Senior Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                              2,901,908
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       615,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        24,395
<INVENTORY>                                                         459,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    4,041,183
<PP&E>                                                              20,776,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      5,541,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      20,800,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               1,126,013
<BONDS>                                                             3,134,936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         1,229
<COMMON>                                                            1,151,083
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        20,800,424
<SALES>                                                             1,197,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    1,218,840
<CGS>                                                               586,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       893,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    977,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  286,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (610,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (610,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (655,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.07)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Voluntary Dissolution of Bishop & Sinclair, Inc.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 3, 1956.

*Floyd M. Grant*for petitioner.

*Grey & Murphy*for respondent.

Morris Eder, J.

This is an application by a 50% stockholder of a corporation, which was dissolved in 1949 by a voluntary certificate pursuant to section 105 of the Stock Corporation Law, for an accounting by the directors and distribution of the remaining assets. It appears that the other 50% stockholder instituted in September, 1955, an action in the Municipal Court for the reasonable value of services rendered to the corporation subsequent to the dissolution. The directors, who are evenly divided in number as between the two stockholders and their nominees, had not been able to agree upon payment of that claim.

Petitioner is actually seeking to have this court determine the validity and amount of the claim rather than the Municipal Court. Section 106 of the Stock Corporation Law was amended in 1955 (L. 1955, ch. 852) to grant jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to determine the validity or invalidity of claims against a dissolved corporation “ which shall have been submitted to the court for determination ” (suhd. 2). Section 105 was then *156amended (L. 1955, ch. 852) to provide that any claims, whose validity and amount shall not have been submitted to the Supreme Court for determination, may be prosecuted by action (subd. 12). Whether, under the amendment, the Supreme Court in such a proceeding may, despite opposition by the claimant, determine the validity and amount of his claim where no previous action has been instituted, need not be here decided; the word “ submitted ” may be deemed to comprehend a submission by both parties only. But it seems clear that where an action has been commenced and the claimant wishes to prosecute it, there is no authority for a summary determination under the terms of the applicable sections.

The -application is accordingly granted to the extent of directing distribution of the amount on hand after deducting the sum of $2,500, which shall be retained until final determination of the pending action, and a final distribution or accounting then made depending on the outcome.

Settle order accordingly.
----

----

| Re: | Pertenencia      Irene Una al Dos |
|-----|-----------------------------------|

|   | Comuna      de Vallenar, Huasco, III Region,Chile |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

|   | 1. | The      price is the equivalent of $21,000,000 Chilean pesos in US      dollars. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | We      will pay the notary costs incurred in documenting the purchase and      transferring the titles. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The      closing will follow when we have completed our due diligence      review. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | You      will provide any data that you have and information that we request for      our due diligence review. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | You      hold the title to the mensuras free and clear of any claims and will keep      them clear of claims. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | You      will not offer the mensuras to any other party or accept any other      offer |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Kevin Mitchell |   |   |   |   |
| Kevin      Mitchell     |   |   |   |   |

|                    |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Kevin Mitchell |   |   |   |   |
| Kevin      Mitchell     |   |   |   |   |
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0284 BRIDGET J. KELLY,

Appellee and Petit io ner, v. JOSEPH S. CAMP III,

Appellant and Respondent. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal bein g subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Anna M.**  **Williams,** whose name appears next on th e list of attorneys desiring appointment as med iators fo r D omest ic Relat io ns appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time periods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from th e date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s June 30, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Joseph S. Camp, III, Kevin S. Brown, Anna M. Williams 06/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0284
Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Terms of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 Effective for Calendar Year 2005 
  

	•	 	The Company’s non-executive Chairman of the Board is paid (in quarterly installments) an annual retainer fee of $75,000, and each other non-employee director is paid an annual
retainer fee of $50,000.1 

  

	•	 	Each non-employee director receives an annual stock option grant to purchase 3,000 common shares.2 

  

	•	 	The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $7,500. 

  

	•	 	The Chairmen of the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Executive Committee each receive an annual retainer fee of
$3,500. 

  

	•	 	In addition to the payments described above, all non-employee directors are paid the following fees: 

  

	 	•	 	$2,000 per meeting for attending meetings of the Board of Directors; 

  

	 	•	 	$1,000 for participation in a telephonic Board meeting; 

  

	 	•	 	$1,000 per committee meeting attended; and 

  

	 	•	 	$500 per committee meeting by telephone conference. 

  

	•	 	All directors are reimbursed for ordinary and necessary out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors. 



	1	Subject to shareholder approval of amendments to the Company’s 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan to permit director participation in that plan, half of these
retainers will be paid in cash and half in the Company’s common shares. 


	2	These grants are subject to shareholder approval of amendments to the Company’s 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan to permit director participation in that
plan.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6691 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6691

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for 
    the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2022

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit Federal funding for 
    the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Propaganda Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC 
              BROADCASTING.

    (a) In General.--Section 396 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
U.S.C. 396) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(m) Prohibition on Federal Funds.--No Federal funds may be made 
available to the Corporation after the date of the enactment of the No 
Propaganda Act.''.
    (b) Corporation Prohibited From Accepting Federal Funds.--Section 
396(g) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 396(g)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting ``subject to 
        paragraph (3)(C),'' before ``obtain''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(C) accepting funds from the Federal Government after the 
        date of the enactment of the No Propaganda Act.''.
    (c) Rescission.--Any unobligated balances of amounts made available 
under the heading ``Corporation for Public Broadcasting'' in the 
Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116-94; 133 
Stat. 2600) or the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 
116-260) are hereby rescinded.
    (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 396(k)(3)(A)(iv)(II) of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 396(k)(3)(A)(iv)(II)) is amended 
by inserting ``before the date of the enactment of the No Propaganda 
Act'' after ``amounts received''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32.2–
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





The undersigned, Donald L. Sytsma, Chief
Financial Officer of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended August 31, 2007 (the "Report") which thisstatement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and





(2)the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
ofoperations of the
Company.








Dated: April 21,
2008





/s/ Donald L.
      SytsmaChief Financial
      Officer(principal financial and
      accounting officer)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20268]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Application Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Science Foundation 
(NSF) has received a waste management permit application for operation 
of a 54-foot steel-hulled ketch, Northanger, sailing and making 
landings along the west coast of the Antarctic Peninsula, operated by 
the Explorer's Corner LLC, a company within the United States. The 
application is submitted to NSF pursuant to regulations issued under 
the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application by October 3, 2008. 
Permit applications may be inspected by interested parties at the 
Permit Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Polly A. Penhale or Nadene Kennedy 
at the above address or (703) 292-8030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF's Antarctic Waste Regulation, 45 CFR 
part 671, requires all U.S. citizens and entities to obtain a permit 
for the use or release of a designated pollutant in Antarctica, and for 
the release of waste in Antarctica. NSF has received a permit 
application under this Regulation for operation of a sailing ketch, 
Northanger, conducting passenger landings along the western coast of 
the Antarctic Peninsula. The small amount of waste created by the 
expedition team will be removed, including all fuel bottles, batteries, 
plastics, and non-combustible wastes, including perishable and 
nonperishable food wastes.
    The permit applicant is: Olaf Malver, Explorers' Corner LLC, 1865 
Solano Avenue, PMB926, Berkeley, CA 94707. Permit application No. 2009 
WM-003.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-20268 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 7, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0930

Lower Tribunal No. 08-0531-P

________________

Marlen Cantero Mesa, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

The Bank of New York Mellon, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis Garcia, 

Judge.

The People's Advocate, PLLC, and Joseph Brien (Hallandale Beach), 

for appellants.

DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, and Kimberly George (Ft. Lauderdale), for 

appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of VS Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Tolworthy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VS Holdings, Inc.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 28, 2008



/s/ THOMAS A. TOLWORTHYThomas A. TolworthyChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.