alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Precision Castparts Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal period ended October 1, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Donegan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 8, 2006



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark Donegan                    
|Mark Donegan                        
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         121,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  392,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    799,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,358,650
<PP&E>                                         851,240
<DEPRECIATION>                               (547,657)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,829,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          737,819
<BONDS>                                     18,088,679
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              240
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,000,283)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,829,622
<SALES>                                      2,485,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,485,579
<CGS>                                        1,447,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,447,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               763,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,165,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (890,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (890,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                131,382
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,021,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMIE M. BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 472 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1468 WDA 

2018 (Olson, Ott, Colins, JJ.), 

entered on October 2, 2019, 

affirming the PCRA Order of the 

Beaver County Court of Common 

Pleas at No. CP-04-CR-0000913-

2001 (McBride, S.J.), entered on 

September 21, 2018

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT

JUSTICE WECHT

Although I agree that three of the four issues that Petitioner raises do not merit our 

review, I would grant allocatur as to his remaining question. In that issue, Petitioner asks:

Whether, in a matter of first impression, the panel erred in finding that the 

PCRA[1] court did not have jurisdiction to consider Brown’s timeliness claims 

raised within sixty days of discovery following a remand for a hearing on a 

separate timeliness claim, which is inconsistent with the plain language of 

42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(2), Commonwealth v. Lark, 746 A.2d 585 (Pa. 2000), 

Commonwealth v. Porter, 35 A.3d 4 (Pa. 2012), and conflicts with 

Commonwealth v. Montgomery, 181 A.3d 359 (Pa. Super. 2018) (en banc)?

Petition for Allowance of Appeal (“PAA”), 472 WAL 2019, at 7 (footnote omitted).

In Commonwealth v. Sepulveda, 144 A.3d 1270 (Pa. 2016), this Court stated “that 

a PCRA court does not have discretion to treat new claims raised by a PCRA petitioner 

 

1 Post Conviction Relief Act. 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46.
[472 WAL 2019] - 2

as an amended PCRA petition following remand from this Court unless such amendment

is expressly authorized in the remand order.” Id. at 1280 (emphasis added); see also 

Commonwealth v. Rivera, 199 A.3d 365, 388-89 (Pa. 2018) (applying Sepulveda and 

holding that a PCRA petitioner could not amend his petition upon remand). Petitioner 

asserts that, “[t]o the extent Sepulveda and Rivera preclude amendments after a remand, 

they did not hold that timeliness based claims and their related derivative merits based 

issues cannot be considered as a separate petition and consolidated with the remanded 

claim.” PAA at 23-24 (emphasis added). 

Petitioner has identified a gap in our PCRA jurisprudence: this Court has not yet

answered the question of whether a PCRA court can consider a new PCRA petition while 

another petition is on remand. This issue is an appropriate one for allocatur review, as it 

offers this Court an opportunity to provide guidance for PCRA courts confronting similar 

circumstances.
Exhibit 23.1
 N   O   V   A        R   E   S   O   U   R   C   E ,       I   N   C.
 CERTIFIED PETROLEUM  GEOLOGISTS   *REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS*   CERTIFIED PETROLEUM GEOPHYSICISTS
 Oil & Gas Exploration  and  Production  *  Certified   SEC   Reserves   Valuations
 
 P. O. Box 743324
 Dallas, Texas 75374
 Tel/Fax(972)530-3930
 novapet@tx.rr.com
 
 
 
 April 21, 2011
 
 Alamo Energy Corp.
 10497 Town and Country Way
 Suite 310
 Houston Texas U.S.A. 77024
 (832) 436-1832
 
 RE: “Certified Updated SEC Reserves Report and Economic Valuation of Lozano Lease located In Frio County, Texas” report dated December 10, 2010.
 
 CONSENT OF TECHNICAL REPORT AUTHOR
 
 Nova Resource, Inc. does hereby consent to the written disclosure of unmodified extracts of Nova’s technical report titled “Certified Updated SEC Reserves Report and Economic Valuation of Lozano Lease located In Frio County, Texas” dated December 10, 2010 (the “Technical Report”) within the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Alamo Energy Corp. (the “Annual Report”).
 
 We, Nova Resource, Inc. and its officers, do hereby state that Nova Resource, Inc. and its officers generated the technical report and that Nova Resource, Inc. believes that the technical report states fairly and accurately the information in the technical report.
 
 Nova Resource, Inc.
 
 Joseph V. Rochefort
 Joseph V. Rochefort
 President
 P. O. Box 743324
 Dallas, Texas   75374
Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers of the Registrant



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT 
  
 Set forth below are the 2005 annual base salaries of the named executive
officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation 
S-K) of Wisconsin Energy Corporation. Unless otherwise noted, the named executive officers serve in the positions indicated for Wisconsin Energy Corporation (WEC) and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WE) and Wisconsin Gas LLC (WG), both reporting companies under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 
  

				
	 Gale E. Klappa
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	961,750
		
	 Frederick D. Kuester
Executive Vice President of WEC and WG;
Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of
WE
	  	$	557,000
		
	 Allen L. Leverett
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
	  	$	515,000
		
	 Larry Salustro
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
	  	$	406,575
		
	 Kristine A. Rappé
Senior Vice President and Chief
Administrative Officer
	  	$	345,000
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 172 (Thursday, September 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51640-51641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 51641]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: October 14-15, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn, El Tropicano Riverwalk, 110 Lexington 
Avenue, San Antonio, TX 78205.
    Contact Person: Raj K Krishnaraju, PhD, MS, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Dr. 
Rm 4AN 32J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4864, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba0a0b9a2b8a3a5aa8ba5a2afa8b9e5a5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a9a9b0abb1aaaca382acaba6a1b0ecacabaaeca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 26, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-20326 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health  

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5  U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH Clinical Center.  

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the Clinical Center, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.  

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH Clinical Center.                      

*Date:*                         September 8-9, 2008.                      

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 2 p.m.                      

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate the Transfusion Medicine Department Review.                      

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center Drive, Room 4-2551,  Bethesda, MD 20892.                      

*Contact Person:*                         David K. Henderson, MD, Deputy Director for Clinical Care, Office of the Director, Clinical Center,  National Institutes of Health,  Building 10, Room 6-1480,  Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-3515.                      

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by the intramural research review cycle. 

Dated: August 25, 2008.  

Jennifer Spaeth,  

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-20190 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]  

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         271,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  404,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,732,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,544,560
<PP&E>                                       5,637,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,675,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,976,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,070,754
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,393,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,976,971
<SALES>                                      1,947,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,947,046
<CGS>                                        1,807,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,807,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               762,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (622,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (622,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (622,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30854

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STERLING LEWIS, also known as Bam Bam, also known as Bam,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:02-CR-302-5

Before GARWOOD, DENNIS and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sterling Lewis, federal prisoner # 28129-034, appeals the district court’s

July 23 (and 29), 2008 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his

sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of

cocaine base, at least 500 grams but less than 5 kilograms of cocaine

hydrochloride, and at least 50 kilograms but less than 100 kilograms of

marijuana. Lewis’s § 3582(c)(2) motion was based on Amendment 706 of the

Sentencing Guidelines. In denying the motion, the district court reasoned that

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 7, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 08-30854 Document: 00511104544 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2010
No. 08-30854

2

Lewis had received two prior substantial sentence reductions, pursuant to

motions under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 and FED. R. CRIM. P. 35; his sentence was

already 57 months less than the bottom of his recalculated guidelines range; and

no further reduction in his sentence was warranted. Lewis argues that the

district court’s denial of his motion constituted an abuse of discretion.

Lewis’s appeal is not barred by the waiver in his plea agreement. See

United States v. Cooley, 590 F.3d 293, 296-97 (5th Cir. 2009) (holding that an

identical waiver did not bar an appeal). A district court’s decision whether to

reduce a sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed,

(Jan. 28, 2010) (No. 09-8939). The district court was permitted but not required

to grant a reduction in Lewis’s sentence. See § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B); Cooley, 590 F.3d

at 297. The record reflects that the district court was aware of its authority to

grant a reduction to Lewis’s sentence, was presented with Lewis’s arguments in

favor of a reduction, and had before it documents allowing for consideration of

the factors relevant to the decision whether to grant a reduction. We discern no

abuse of discretion by the district court. See Cooley, 590 F.3d at 297-98; Evans,

587 F.3d at 672-73; United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 (5th Cir.

1995).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 08-30854 Document: 00511104544 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2010
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10–K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 of EV Energy, L.P. (the “Partnership”) and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John B.
Walker, President and Chief Executive Officer of EV Management, LLC, the general
partner of EV Energy GP, L.P., the general partner of the Partnership, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




•
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





•
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.






Date:
March 12, 2009


/s/ JOHN B. WALKER


John
B. Walker


Chief
Executive Officer of EV Management LLC,


general
partner of EV Energy GP, L.P.,


general
partner of EV Energy Partners, L.P.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-01861) of Chyron Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Melville, New York

March 31, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wilbert WILSON Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-30354.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 15, 2003.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Wilbert Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to perform on an alleged agreement. Wilson argues that the district court has authority to review the Government’s refusal to move for a downward departure and that the district court should have conducted a hearing prior to denying him relief. He argues that the Government has acted in bad faith and has breached a cooperation agreement. He asserts that the jurisdictional basis for his motion is Fed. R.Crim. P. 35(b). Wilson’s motion cannot arise under fed. r. crim. p. 35(b) because the motion was not filed by the Government.

Wilson has appealed from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Wilson’s motion is AFFIRMED because the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Herman Knightshade, * From the 385th District Court

of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CV49624.

Vs. No. 11-17-00250-CV * July 25, 2019

Star Freight, L.L.C. and * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

Marlow Rodriguez, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Herman Knightshade.