alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6799 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the John P. 

Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, as a unit of the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Mrs. BEATTY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility 

of establishing the John P. Parker House in Ripley, 

Ohio, as a unit of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John P. Parker House 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6799 IH

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

4 means the John P. Parker House in Ripley, Ohio, 

5 which was recognized as a National Historic Land6 mark in 1997. 

7 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF THE JOHN P. 

8 PARKER HOUSE. 

9 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

10 resource study of the study area. 

11 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub12 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

13 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

14 study area; 

15 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

16 designating the study area as a unit of the National 

17 Park System; 

18 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

19 protection, and interpretation of the study area by 

20 the Federal Government, State or local government 

21 entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

22 (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, 

23 State or local governmental entities, private and 

24 nonprofit organizations, or any other interested indi25 viduals; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6799 IH

1 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac2 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

3 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

4 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

5 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec6 tion 100507 of title 54, United States Code. 

7 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

8 date on which funds are made available to carry out this 

9 Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Nat10 ural Resources of the House of Representatives and the 

11 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Sen12 ate a report that describes— 

13 (1) the results of the study; and 

14 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health  

Notice is hereby given of a Request for Information (RFI): Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee Draft Strategic Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Research is Available for Comment, NOT-MH-08-021, issued by the National Institute of Mental Health on behalf of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC).  

                    The draft Strategic Plan does not include cost estimates for implementation. However, the IACC has                           ( print page 51499)                        formed a workgroup to advise the IACC about the budgetary requirements needed to fulfill the research objectives described in the draft Strategic Plan. The IACC will review the workgroup recommendations at its next meeting on November 21, 2008.                  

                    The purpose of this time-sensitive RFI is to seek comments on the draft Strategic Plan from ASD stakeholders such as individuals with ASD and their families, autism advocates, scientists, health professionals, therapists, educators, officials of state and local programs for ASD, and the public at large. Please see the official RFI notice at                     *http://grants.nih.gov/​grants/​guide/​notice-files/​NOT-MH-08-021.html*                     for more information and instructions for responding by the deadline of September 30, 2008. Responses should be directed to                     *iacc@mail.nih.gov.*

*Contact Person:*                     Attention: Strategic Plan for ASD Research RFI, Office of the Director,  National Institute of Mental Health, NIH,  6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 8235, MSC 9669,  Bethesda, MD 20892-9669,                     *iaccpublicinquiries@mail.nih.gov.*

                    Information about the IACC is available on the Web site:                     *http://www.nimh.nih.gov/​research-funding/​scientific-meetings/​recurring-meetings/​iacc/​index.shtml.*

Dated: August 26, 2008.  

Anna Snouffer,  

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-20318 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]  

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Matysek, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual
  report on Form 10-KSB of Quincy Energy Corp.

2.      Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of and for the periods
presented in this report.

4.      The small business
issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.

5.      The small business
issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 25, 2006

/s/ Paul Matysek Paul Matysek Chief Executive
Officer

---
Exhibit 3(b)

 

 

 

 

BY-LAWS

 

OF

 

THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMENDED JUNE 1, 2000

 

 

 

THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY

 

BY-LAWS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Barry W. Karlin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2007



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    DR. BARRY W.
KARLIN                                                                       
|Dr. Barry W. Karlin Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC
Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In
      connection with the Annual Report of Royal Equine, Inc (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich
      ,
      Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 31, 2008





/s/
                Demitro MarianovichDemitro
                MarianovichChief
                Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 16, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40514 Summary Calendar

JERRY EARL WHITE, also known as Jerry Earl Grice Plaintiff - Appellant

v. BILLY GARCIA, MR REYNA Defendants - Appellees

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:00-CV-137

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Earl White, also known as Jerry Earl Grice, appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants dismissing his civil-rights complaint alleging Fourth Amendment violations. White argues that the transcript of the trial held in state court shows that the defendants’ averments that he was arrested for state-law violations before he was searched are lies. He also argues that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint without considering his response to the summary-judgment motion.No. 04-40514 -2- The defendants’ affidavits averred that White had been stopped and arrested for traffic violations before the search incident to the arrest revealed the cocaine. The affidavits submitted by the defendants met their burden as the moving party of establishing that there was no genuine issue of material fact.
See Whren v. United States , 517 U.S. 806, 810 (1996); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986); Gustafson v. Florida , 414 U.S. 260, 266 (1973) ; United States v. Thomas , 120 F.3d 564, 573 (5th Cir. 1997). White’s response to the summary-judgment motion did not create a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment because he did not dispute that the defendants had pulled him over for a valid traffic stop, nor did it dispute the fact that the defendants had probable cause to arrest him for the traffic violations. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp. , 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) . Therefore, the district court was correct in granting the summary judgment motion. Although in granting the summary-judgment motion, the district court initially overlooked White’s response, after White’s motion for relief from judgment, the district court considered White’s response and appropriately concluded that White had not carried his burden to defeat the summary-judgment motion. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### RAINEY et al. v. ROESALL CORP.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

March 16, 1954.

Ray Selden, Daytona Beach, for appellant-

Walton & Walton, H. É. Merryday, Pa-iatka, for appellee.

BARNS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dismissal entered in open court when the case was called for trial, at which time the appellant-plaintiff sought a continuance for the term. The continuance was denied. We find no error and affirm.

The suit was commenced in August, 1949, and came at issue in January, 1952, whereupon the defendant on September 25, 1952, “noticed” the case for trial, and the case was set for trial on October 28, 1952.

When the case was called for trial appellants’ attorney filed a written motion for a continuance for the term setting forth that upon the case being noticed for trial that arrangements were made to take the deposition of the plaintiff in Mississippi through associate counsel of Mississippi; that he had not received copies of the deposition “if they were taken”, and counsel for the defendant had advised that such depositions were not taken, and such is the only knowledge that counsel has of the matter. He was advised by letter on the morning of trial date that the depositions were not taken.

Upon this motion being presented the Court advised plaintiffs’ counsel that the motion was not sufficient and indicated that counsel might “like to redraft” which offer was refused, and thereupon defendant’s counsel filed and presented a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution, which was granted.

Relating to continuances, in Courtney v. Central Trust Co., 112 Fla. 298, 150 So. 276, it is said: “While much must be left to the discretion of a trial judge in a matter like this, and this court is always most reluctant and hesitant in reversing judgments rendered after continuances have been applied for and denied, yet we have not hesitated to consistently declare that, when a trial judge perceives that in consequence , of inadvertence of counsel, or other cause, the rigid enforcement of rules of procedure would defeat the great object for which they were established, it is his duty to so relax them (when it can be done without injustice to any) as to make them subserve. their true purpose, which is to promote the true administration of justice. See Barber v. State, 5 Fla. 199, text 204.”

Under the facts and circumstances we are unable to conclude that the trial judge committed reversible error. When a defendant notices the case for trial and the plaintiff is unable to proceed because *161plaintiff is1 absent or because her deposition simply has not been taken more is required in order to make it appear that the trial judge failed to exercise sound judicial discretion.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J.,, and TERRELL,. .SE-BRING, . MATHEWS . and DREW, JJ., concur.

THOMAS, J., dissents.-

THOMAS, Justice.

I dissent because I am of the opinion that the appeal^ should be dismissed 'for want of a final judgment
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 9, 2005

  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi
##### 



EXHIBIT 32(a)
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Peter J. BurlagePeter J. BurlagePresident and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 11, 2008 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1999 OF PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         196,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    246,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               960,400
<PP&E>                                       6,124,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,558,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,961,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          711,700
<BONDS>                                        818,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       362,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,118,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,961,000
<SALES>                                        663,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               663,100
<CGS>                                          524,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  524,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,500)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>