alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         1,496,098
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,377,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15,000
<INVENTORY>                                    27,703,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33,304,669
<PP&E>                                         5,313,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,360,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,125,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,425,085
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          202,387
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,625,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,125,574
<SALES>                                        15,474,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,670,771
<CGS>                                          10,353,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,380,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             74,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,258,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                   478,587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   780,587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .08
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6619 

To prohibit the Secretary of Education from providing Federal funds to 

a local educational agency unless in-person instruction is available to 

all students and parents may opt out of student mask mandates, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2022 

Mrs. HINSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Education from providing Federal funds to a local educational agency unless in-person 

instruction is available to all students and parents may 

opt out of student mask mandates, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unmask Our Kids 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6619 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITIONS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds shall be made available 

3 under any applicable program to a local educational agen4 cy unless— 

5 (1) in-person instruction is available to all stu6 dents at each public elementary school and sec7 ondary school under the jurisdiction of such agency; 

8 and 

9 (2) a parent of a student at any such school 

10 may elect to opt out of any requirement that the 

11 student wear a face covering. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) APPLICABLE PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘appli14 cable program’’ has the meaning given the term in 

15 section 400(c) of the General Education Provisions 

16 Act (20 U.S.C. 1221(c)). 

17 (2) ESEA TERMS.—The terms ‘‘elementary 

18 school’’, ‘‘local educational agency’’, ‘‘parent’’, and 

19 ‘‘secondary school’’ have the meanings given such 

20 terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and Sec21 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**27 KA 13-00861**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JACOB C. BUCHANAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM CLAUSS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joanne M. Winslow, J.), rendered August 28, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in People v Buchanan ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 5, 2016]).

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-HY10
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HY10


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### John A. BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF MICHIGAN, Dart Container Corporation of Kentucky, Dart Container Corporation of Pennsylvania, and Dart Container Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1165.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 28, 2002.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
EXHIBIT 31(a)

I, Thomas M. Patrick, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Shore Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 9, 2005

  /s/  Thomas M. Patrick
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.


DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JUNE 13, 2012)


WHEREAS, Oxford Industries, Inc. (“ Oxford ”) sponsors the Oxford Industries, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated effective June 13, 2012) (the “ Plan ”); and


WHEREAS, Oxford desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of eligible employee for purposes of determining who may participate in the Plan.


NOW THEREFORE, Oxford, pursuant to the approval of its Board of Directors, hereby amends the Plan as follows effective as of July 1, 2016:


1.    Section 1.14. Eligible Employee , is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


Section 1.14. Eligible Employee – means, for each Plan Year, (a) effective July 1, 2016, any Employee of a Company whose gross annual rate of base salary is $175,000 or more; and (b) any other Employee of a Company (not otherwise qualifying as an Eligible Employee pursuant to the foregoing clause (a)) who is an Eligible Employee as of June 30, 2016 for so long as such Employee has in effect an election to defer any portion of such Employee’s Eligible Compensation pursuant to the Plan.


2.    Except as expressly modified by this First Amendment to the Plan, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the Plan.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Oxford has caused this First Amendment to the Plan to be executed on the date set forth below.


OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.





By: /s/ Thomas E. Campbell


Name:  Thomas E. Campbell


Title:    Executive Vice President


Date: June 15, 2016





1
AEP System Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers









Exhibit
10(q)




AMERICAN
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.




BASE
SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




Effective
January 1, 2005




On
January 25, 2005, the independent members of the AEP Board of Directors set the
2005 annual base salary for Michael G. Morris at $1,150,000. On January 25,
2005, the Human Resources Committee of the AEP Board of Directors set the 2005
annual base salaries for Susan Tomasky at $500,000; Thomas M. Hagan at $440,000;
Holly K. Koeppel at $440,000; and Robert P. Powers at $450,000. Each of these
individuals is an AEP named executive officer for 2004.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6476 

To amend the International Financial Institutions Act to provide instructions 

with respect to the U.S. policy on co-financing arrangements at the 

multilateral development banks, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2022 

Mr. TORRES of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the International Financial Institutions Act to 

provide instructions with respect to the U.S. policy on 

co-financing arrangements at the multilateral development banks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. U.S. POLICY ON CO-FINANCING ARRANGE4 MENTS AT THE MULTILATERAL DEVELOP5 MENT BANKS. 

6 Title XVI of the International Financial Institutions 

7 Act (22 U.S.C. 262p et seq.) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6476 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 1632. U.S. POLICY ON CO-FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS 

2 AT THE MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT 

3 BANKS. 

4 ‘‘The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the 

5 United States Executive Directors at the multilateral de6 velopment banks (as defined in section 1701(c)(4)) to use 

7 the voice and vote of the United States to vote against 

8 any program or project at the respective institution if it 

9 includes joint or parallel financing provided by the Asian 

10 Infrastructure Investment Bank unless the Secretary of 

11 the Treasury has certified to the Committee on Financial 

12 Services of the House of Representatives and the Com13 mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that the Asian 

14 Infrastructure Investment Bank— 

15 ‘‘(1) has the authority and the resources to pro16 vide grants and concessional assistance to countries 

17 eligible to borrow from the International Develop18 ment Association on terms similar to those provided 

19 to these countries by the International Development 

20 Association; and 

21 ‘‘(2) has demonstrated a track record of pro22 viding such assistance to these countries.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

Section 1350 Certification as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, LTD. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 15, 2014             

By: /s/ Hin Kwok Sheung

                                           

Hin Kwok Sheung

Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

Section 1350 Certification as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, LTD. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 15, 2014             

By: /s/Ben Choi

                                           

Ben Choi

Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2610

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Curtis AJ Harrell

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: April 11, 2022

Filed: May 2, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Harrell pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a

firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He was subject to a 15-year mandatory

minimum sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). The
district court1

 calculated an advisory Guideline range of 188–235 months and

sentenced Harrell to a within-range sentence of 210 months. Harrell appeals and

argues that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. We affirm. 

We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). “An abuse

of discretion occurs where the sentencing court fails to consider a relevant factor that

should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to an improper or

irrelevant factor, or considers only the appropriate factors but commits a clear error

of judgment in weighing those factors.” United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077

(8th Cir. 2012). 

There was no abuse of discretion in this case. The district court considered

mitigating factors including Harrell’s mental condition, his difficult childhood, the

abuse he suffered, and his traumatic brain injuries. As an aggravating factor,

however, the court also considered Harrell’s significant history of violence. Harrell

has felony convictions for first-degree aggravated robbery, prohibited person in

possession of a firearm, second-degree assault, and first-degree assault. Harrell’s

criminal history demonstrates that he frequently used firearms to commit robberies

and assaults. While in pretrial custody on the present charges, Harrell committed

several major rule violations including, among others, assault, fighting, sexual

harassment, and threats. 

Given this violent history, it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court

to determine that a Guideline sentence was appropriate in this case. United States v.

Brown, 992 F.3d 665, 673 (8th Cir. 2021) (“[Defendant]’s assertion of substantive

unreasonableness amounts to nothing more than a disagreement with how the district

1The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

-2-
court chose to weigh the § 3553(a) factors in fashioning his sentence.”). Accordingly,

we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

______________________________

-3-
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00353

- CR

Amanda Acosta a/k/a Amanda Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. S

- 16

- 3092CR

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEA LS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 23, 2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hugh Vasconcellos, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered December 4, 1987.

*617Ordered that the judgment is affirmed *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-03-1997
<CASH>                                          10,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    209,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,472
<PP&E>                                         312,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           696
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,356
<SALES>                                        360,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,444
<CGS>                                          207,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[SDM 98495]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; 
Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the notice published in 73 FR 49217-49218, published August 
20, 2008, as FR Doc. E8-19262, make the following correction:
    On page 49217, column 3, following T. 7 S., R. 3 E., Sec. 32, 
should read ``All, except SE\1/4\SE\1/4\ and HES 348''.

    Dated: August 25, 2008.
Cindy Staszak,
Chief, Branch of Land Resources.
[FR Doc. E8-20338 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P