alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip B.
Douglas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 220, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2008 |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ PHILLIP B. DOUGLAS 
|                     |  | Phillip B. Douglas     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
10.1 Director Compensation Summary


EXHIBIT 10.1




Director Compensation Summary


We currently pay our non-management directors an annual retainer of $215,000 per year, $115,000 of which is paid in cash and $100,000 of which is paid in restricted stock. A director may elect to receive his or her entire annual retainer in restricted stock.


Restricted stock vest on the day immediately prior to the first annual general meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected following the grant of the stock. However, if, prior to such vesting date, either (i) a change in control (as defined in the Assured Guaranty Ltd. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended) of Assured Guaranty Ltd. occurs before the director terminates service on the Board or (ii) the director terminates service on the Board as a result of such director’s death or disability, then the restricted stock will vest on the date of such change in control or the date of the director’s termination of service, whichever is applicable. Grants of restricted stock receive cash dividends and have voting rights. 


Our Share Ownership Guidelines require that each director own the greater of (i) at least 25,000 Common Shares or (ii) Common Shares with a market value of at least three times the maximum cash portion of the annual director retainer, before being permitted to dispose of any shares acquired as compensation from the Company. Once a director has reached the Share Ownership Guideline, for so long as he or she serves on the Board, such director may not dispose of any Common Shares if such disposition would cause the director to be below the Share Ownership Guideline. Vested restricted stock, vested restricted stock units (i.e., units for which Common Shares will be received by a director six months after termination of such director’s service on the Board), and purchased shares will all count toward the Stock Ownership Guideline.


In addition to the annual retainer described above:


	
		
	 
	 

	•
	The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $100,000 annual retainer






	
		
	 
	 

	•
	The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $30,000 annual retainer




	
		
	 
	 

	•
	The Chairman of each of the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Finance Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee receives an additional $15,000 annual retainer




	
		
	 
	 

	•
	Members of the Audit Committee, other than the chairman, receive an additional $15,000 annual retainer




	
		
	 
	 

	•
	Members, other than the chairman, of each of the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Finance Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee receive an additional $10,000 annual retainer.







EXHIBIT 10.1




Members of the Executive Committee do not receive any additional compensation.


The Company generally will not pay a fee for attendance at board or committee meetings, although the Chairman of the Board has the discretion to pay attendance fees of $2,000 for extraordinary or special meetings.
### NUMBER 13

- 1 7

- 00 529

- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ASHLEY ROY , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam
This matter is before the Court because the reporter’s record has not been filed.
The clerk’s record was filed on September 2 7, 2017 . On October 6, 2017 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s appointed counsel he had failed to request the reporter’s record and requested that he forward proof of compliance to the Court within ten days. Counsel has failed to file a respons e and the reporter’s record has not been filed.2

This situation requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(a)(2). Accordingly, this appeal

is ABATED and the cause REMA NDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) whether appellant is indigent; (3) whether appell ant is entitled to a free appellate record and appointed counsel due to his indigency; and (4) what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a complete reporter’s record, and shall enter any orders required to avoid further delay and to pres erve the parties’ rights. The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court s hall cause a supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 27 th day of October, 2017.
Exhibit 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Mark
W. Simon, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certifies
that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended
                  March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 10, 2005

                               /s/ Mark W. Simon
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Mark W. Simon
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Calogero Carcione, by His Guardian ad Litem, Antonio Carcione, Respondent, v*.*John B. McDonald and Andrew Onderdonk, Appellants.

Appeal from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 30th day of November, 1908, granting leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by requiring as a condition of amendment the payment by the plaintiff of full taxable costs in the action up to date, including trial fee. As so modified the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to the appellants. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in memorandum, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants. Settle order on notice.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6512 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6512

To repeal the authority of the Food and Drug Administration to require 
that drugs be dispensed only upon prescription, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2022

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the authority of the Food and Drug Administration to require 
that drugs be dispensed only upon prescription, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prescription Freedom Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FDA AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE PRESCRIPTIONS.

    (a) Repeal.--Effective as of the date that is 6 months after the 
date of enactment of this Act, subsection (b) of section 503 of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 353) is repealed.
    (b) References.--Beginning on the effective date described in 
subsection (a), any reference in a Federal statute, regulation, or 
guidance--
            (1) to prescribing, a prescription, a prescription drug, or 
        a drug subject to section 503(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
        Cosmetic Act is deemed to be a reference to prescribing, a 
        prescription, or a prescription drug, respectively, under 
        applicable State law; and
            (2) to any requirement or provision of section 503(b) of 
        the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is deemed to be a 
        reference to the corresponding requirement or provision, if 
        any, in applicable State law, as determined by the Federal 
        official or officials responsible for administering the 
        respective Federal statute, regulation, or guidance.
    (c) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services may continue to exercise the 
authority vested by subsection (b) of section 503 of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 353), as in effect on the day before 
the effective date described in subsection (a), with respect to any 
drug that is intended for use in terminating a pregnancy.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pennsylvania Electric Company
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H.
Peter Burg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


                             /s/ H. Peter Burg
                         -------------------------------
                                 H. Peter Burg
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                November 26, 2002


                                       100


<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pennsylvania Electric Company
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
H. Marsh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Richard H. Marsh
                                       --------------------------------------
                                                  Richard H. Marsh
                                              Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 26, 2002



                                        101
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6188
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD M. HIRSCHFELD, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-142, CA-95-1089-2) Submitted: November 12, 1996 Decided: January 9, 1997 Before WIDENER, HALL, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard M. Hirschfeld, Appellant Pro Se. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We have jurisdiction over the denial of the motion to recuse because Appellant timely raised the claim in his informal brief. See Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992). 2 PER CURIAM:Richard Hirschfeld appeals the district court's orders (i) denying his motion to recuse the United States Attorney's office in the Eastern District of Virginia and his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214; and (ii) denying his motion to recuse the district court judge. * We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hirschfeld, Nos. CR-90-142; CA-95- 1089-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1995; Jan. 22, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for general relief, deny Appellee's motion to supplement the record, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

AMENDMENT 2014-1 
 TO THE

 DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION 

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RESTORATION PLAN 

The Devon Energy Corporation Defined Contribution Restoration Plan (the “Plan””) is amended, effective December 3,
2013, as follows: 
 1. Section 6.4 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentences to the end of the Section to read as follows: 

For the avoidance of doubt, a Participant who is a “Transferring Employee” (as defined below) shall become fully vested in any
unvested Company Contributions and Credited Earnings thereon effective as of the “Transfer Date” (as defined below). For purposes of this Plan (i) a Transferring Employee shall mean a Participant whose employment with the Company or
any subsidiary is transferred to EnLink Midstream Operating, LP as of the Transfer Date, and (ii) the Transfer Date shall mean March 7, 2014, or such later date as of the occurrence of the “Closing” of the “Mergers” as
defined under the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Devon Energy Corporation, Devon Gas Services, L.P., Acacia Natural Gas Corp I, Inc., Crosstex Energy, Inc., New Public Rangers, L.L.C., Boomer Merger Sub, Inc. and Rangers Merger Sub, Inc.,
dated October 21, 2013. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Devon Energy Corporation (acting through its authorized delegate) has caused this
Amendment 2014-1 to the Plan to be executed this 7th day of March 2014. 
  

			
	DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frank W. Rudolph

	Name:	 	Frank W. Rudolph
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Human Resources
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the August
28, 1999, financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1999
<CASH>                                            2241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     361687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                387486
<PP&E>                                          396273
<DEPRECIATION>                                   56949
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  748339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           176491
<BONDS>                                         362185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      155801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    748339
<SALES>                                        1376761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1378348
<CGS>                                          1014869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1014869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               26158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3821)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5432)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5432)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6113 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6113

  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit employers 
    from inquiring about vaccination status, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2021

    Mr. Mast (for himself, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Posey, Mr. 
Gohmert, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Good of 
Virginia, Mr. Hice of Georgia, and Mr. Babin) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit employers 
    from inquiring about vaccination status, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Employee Privacy Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION RELATING TO VACCINATION STATUS INQUIRIES.

    (a) In General.--The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
201 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 7 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 8. PROHIBITION RELATING TO VACCINATION STATUS INQUIRIES.

    ``It shall be an unlawful practice for an employer to inquire about 
the vaccination status of any current or prospective employee.''.
    (b) Penalties.--Section 16 of such Act (29 U.S.C. 216) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Any person who violates the provisions of section 8 shall--
            ``(1) be subject to a civil penalty of $5,000 for a first 
        offense, increased by an additional $1,000 for each subsequent 
        offense, not to exceed $10,000; and
            ``(2) be liable to each employee or prospective employee 
        who was the subject of the violation for special damages not to 
        exceed $10,000 plus attorneys' fees, and shall be subject to 
        such injunctive relief as may be appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```