alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
177 La. 27

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Billy WASHBURN.

No. 32287.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1933.

Harry Y. Booth, of Shreveport, for hppel-lant.

G. L. Porterie, Atty. Gen. (James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport, and James O’Niell, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of the Prohibition Law, Act No. 39 of 1921 (Ex. Sess.), as amended by Act No. 57 of 1924. Before sentence, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, pleading that Act No. 39 of 1921, as amended, was repealed by Act No. 238 of 1932. The district attorney pleaded that the act of 1932 was unconstitutional, and the plea was sustained by the district judge. The defendant has appealed.

In State v. Watkins, 147 So. 8, this court held that Act No. 238 of 1932 was unconstitutional, for the reason for which the district court has held the law unconstitutional in this ease. The ruling in State v. Watkins was followed in State v. Malone (La. Sup.) 147 So. 11, in State v. Capps (La. Sup.) 147 So. 12, and in State v. Antee (La. Sup.) 147 *490So. 11, all of which cases were decided on the same day. .The ruling is supported by the great weight of authority; and it has been acted upon by the Legislature, convened in special session last Monday.

For the reasons given in State v. Watkins, supra, the conviction and sentence in this case are affirmed.

ST. PAUL, J., dissents. Cf. Police Jury v. McDonogh, 8 La. Ann. 341-358.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW161801]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Retamco Operating Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease WYW161801 for land in Carbon County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW161801 effective April 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Pamela J. Lewis,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. E8-19957 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.













/s/ Thomas M. Petro


Thomas M. Petro


President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Roger S. Deacon


Roger S. Deacon


Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6731 

To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 to extend the 

authorization of financial assistance with respect to the Niagara Falls 

National Heritage Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 

to extend the authorization of financial assistance with 

respect to the Niagara Falls National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

4 Section 432 of the Consolidated Natural Resources 

5 Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–229) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘the date that is 15 years after the date of enactment 

7 of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘May 8, 2038’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           FEB-1-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-3-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-4-1997
<CASH>                                          11,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    188,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,302
<PP&E>                                         309,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           741
<OTHER-SE>                                     261,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,290
<SALES>                                        183,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,464
<CGS>                                          104,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549
                                   FORM 10-Q/A
                                Amendment No. 1

           [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999

                                       OR

          [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         Commission file number: 1-1401

                               PECO Energy Company
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

          Pennsylvania                                 23-0970240
    (State or other jurisdiction of                (I.R.S. Employer 
incorporation or organization)                    Identification No.)

              2301 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA        19103
           (Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)

                                 (215) 841-4000
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                              Yes   _X_           No  ___

Indicate the number of shares  outstanding  of each of the  issuer's  classes of
common stock as of the latest practicable date:

The Company had 191,812,306 shares of common stock outstanding on May 7, 1999.


<PAGE>

     PECO Energy Company, with this Form 10-Q/A, hereby changes the signatory of
this Form 10-Q from Jean H. Gibson, Vice President and Controller, to Michael J.
Egan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.


                                   Signatures

     Pursuant  to  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




                                    PECO ENERGY COMPANY
                                    /s/ Michael J. Egan
                                    -------------------------
                                    MICHAEL J. EGAN
                                    Senior Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date:  May 18, 1999
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 12(b)
                          J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                         and Consolidated Subsidiaries

          Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Fixed Charges



                                                      52 weeks        52 weeks
                                                        ended           ended
                                                     October 28,     October 30,
($ Millions)                                            2000            1999
                                                     -----------     -----------
Income/(loss) from continuing operations              $  (221)         $   863
     (before income taxes, and
     capitalized interest)

Fixed charges

Interest (including capitalized interest) on:

     Operating leases                                     272              225
     Short term debt                                       46              133
     Long term debt                                       483              551
     Capital leases                                         1                2
     Other, net                                             -               (3)

                                                   -----------     ------------
Total fixed charges                                       802              908

                                                   -----------     ------------
Total available income                                $   581          $ 1,771
                                                   ===========     ============

Ratio of available income to fixed charges                0.7              2.0
                                                   ===========     ============


The difference between a one to one coverage ratio and the .7 ratio shown above
for the 52 weeks ended October 28, 2000 is $221 million.

The Company believes that, due to the seasonal nature of its business, ratios
for a period of time other than a 52 week period are inappropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 50194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19755]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 40

[Public Notice: 6328]
RIN 1400-AC04


Aliens Inadmissible Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
Amended: Unlawful Voters

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final the Department interim rule which 
amended the regulations concerning visa ineligibility for aliens who 
vote unlawfully. The amendment was necessary to comply with the 
provisions of the Child Citizenship Act of 2000.

DATES: This rule is effective August 26, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Penafrancia D. Salas, Legislation and 
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington, 
DC 20520-0106, (202) 663-2878.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

What is the Authority and Exception for this rule?

    On June 21, 2005, the Department published an interim rule [70 FR 
35526] that implemented Section 201(b)(1) of Public Law 106-395, Child 
Citizenship Act of 2000 [February 27, 2001]. This Act amended Section 
212(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by adding an 
exception to the ground of inadmissibility, INA 212(a)(10)(D), for 
aliens who voted in violation of the U.S. law. Under INA 212(a)(10)(D), 
in general, an alien will continue to be inadmissible, and therefore, 
ineligible for a visa, if the alien has voted in violation of any 
Federal, State, or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, 
or regulation. Nevertheless, pursuant to the new exception, the alien 
shall not be considered to be inadmissible under any provision of this 
subsection based on such violation if each natural parent of the alien 
(or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the 
alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the 
alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the 
age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of such 
violation that he or she was a citizen.

Were comments solicited in the Departments Interim rule?

    Yes, the Department solicited comments; however, no comments were 
received.
    The final rule is unchanged from the interim rule which amended the 
Departments regulations at 22 CFR 40.104, published in the Federal 
Register on June 21, 2005 (70 FR 35526-35527). The interim rule is 
hereby adopted as final.

    Dated: August 14, 2008.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-19755 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
180 La. 219

#### STATE v. KNIGHT.

No. 32926.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 2, 1934.

M. J. Allen, of Amite, and Robert T. Carter, of Greensburg, for appellant.

G. L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert S. Ellis, Jr., Dist. Atty., of Amite (James O’Niell, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

LAND, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of larceny of a yearling, and was sentenced to the state pen- , itentiary for a term of not less than one year nor more than two years.

Bill of Exceptions No. 1.

On the trial in the lower court, defendant objected to certain evidence tendered by the state for the purpose of rebuttal as not being in the nature of rebuttal evidence.

The per curiam to this bill declares that the evidence objected to by defendant was in rebuttal. The statement of the trial judge as to the nature of the evidence must be accepted by this court, as defendant has filed no brief in this case, and has made no appearance in this court through counsel to point out any error in the ruling of which defendant complains.

Bill of Exceptions No. 2.

This bill was reserved to the overrul ing by the judge a quo of a motion for a neu* trial. The only grounds set forth in this motion are the alleged error as to the admission of the evidence in question, and that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, a matter over which we have no appellate jurisdiction.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### Helen Neuman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Neuman, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*Alexander Feinsinger et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

October 20, 1950.

*A. Martin Stuchiner*and *Thomas H. Simmons*for plaintiff.

*E. Edan Spencer*for defendants.

George J. Beldock, J.

In this death action the defendant Feinsinger moves for summary judgment. The facts are as follows: The deceased was struck by a taxicab on October 24, 1947. The vehicle was owned by defendant Crown Service Corporation and driven by defendant Feinsinger. The corporate defendant was served with the summons and complaint, appeared and answered on March 18, 1948. After abortive attempts to personally serve Feinsinger, an order of substituted service was made on April 22, 1948, and proof of service filed on May 7, 1948. Feinsinger did not appear or answer. Subsequently, on April 17, 1950, personal service was effected on *484Feinsinger. His answer set up the defense of Statute of Limitations, it being claimed that the summons and complaint were served long after the two-year period fixed by the Decedent Estate Law had expired. While the order of substituted service herein has not been set aside or annulled, defendant Feinsinger urges that such service was ineffective as at that time he was not a resident of the State of New York. He asserts in his moving papers that in January, 1948, he left New York State to become a resident of California where he resided continuously until October, 1949, when he returned to New York. When the cause of action accrued in October, 1947, Feinsinger was a resident of this State. Under the provisions of section 19 of the Civil Practice Act, *1 ‘*If, after a cause of action has accrued against a person, he departs from the state and remains continuously absent therefrom for the space of four months or more, * * * the time of his absence * * * is not a part of the time limited for the commencement of the action.” It has been held that the test of whether the statute has tolled is predicated solely upon continuous absence from the State and not continuous residence. *(Turner*v. *American Metal Co.,*268 App. Div. 239; *Banister*v. *Solomon,*126 F. 2d 740; see, also, *National Sur. Co.*v. *Ruffin,*242 N. Y. 413.) Since the Statute of Limitations was tolled between January, 1948, and October, 1949, the personal service upon Feinsinger in May, 1950, was timely. Accordingly, the question of the effectiveness of the substituted service need not be considered. Motion for summary judgment denied. Submit order.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0547

_________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BEAU HERMAN MILLER,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Counsel for Appellant Beau Herman Miller has filed a second motion for extension of time within which to file the reply brief in the captioned matter. Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 13(1), “The appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the brief of the appellee.” On August 27, 2021, the Court granted Appellant a 30 - day extension, until October 4, 2021, to file the reply brief. The Order stated no further extensions would be granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the second motion for a 30 - day extension is DENIED. Appellant has until October 18, 2021, within which to file the reply brief. The Court will not consider any further extensions. If the reply brief is not filed by October 18, the matter will be sent up to the Court for consideration on the briefs filed.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2021

09/30/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0547
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use in the Prospectus Supplements filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) datedSeptember 25, 2008 to Registration Statements No. 333-133184 and333-136297 on Form S-1 of our report dated September 25, 2006 (September 24,2007 as to Note 3), relating to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of Neiman Marcus, Inc. (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an emphasis-of-a-matter paragraphrelating to discontinued operations), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Neiman Marcus, Inc. for the year ended August 2, 2008.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   |
| Dallas, Texas                      |   |
| September 22, 2008            |   |

 

1

----
Order entered October 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01138-CR

 No. 05-16-01139-CR

 No. 05-16-01140-CR

DERRICK BRANNON SULLIVAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1324555-S

ORDER

Niles Illich’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for appellant is GRANTED. The clerk is 

directed to update the court’s records to reflect that Niles Illich is no longer appellant’s counsel 

of record and all future orders and notices are forwarded to appellant, pro se at: TDCJ No. 

02092943, Wallace Unit, 1675 South FM 3525, Colorado City, TX 79512.

Appellant’s Motion for Sanctions is DENIED.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE