U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 A Test of Wescott's Second Cervical Vertebra Sex Estimation Method on a Middle-aged to Senescent Sample
NCJ Number
              254013

Author(s)
          Kimberly M. Raymond;
                        Danielle K. Julien;
                        Lindsay C. Cooper;
                        Kalia Est;
                        Elizabeth A. Digangi
Date Published

2019
Length
              1 page
Annotation
              This study's objective was to further validate the Westcott (2000) method for determining sex based on fragmentary remains or incomplete skeletons, using a sample of primarily older adults (n=45; 24 females, 21 males; ages-at-death 54-90).
Abstract
              The Wescott method involves eight measurements of the second cervical vertebra. He created five discriminant function equations to classify a sample of 153 moder individuals by sex. Correct classification occurred 76.8 percent of the time. In a validation study by Bethard and Seet (2013), Wescott's discriminant functions were found to correctly discriminate sex just over 80 percent of the time. In the current study, the individuals analyzed were donated to an anatomical supply company for use by the current researchers primarily for another project. In the current study, preliminary data analysis demonstrated that Wescott's equations 1, 2, 4, and 5 were able to correctly assess the sex of approximately 60 percent of the sample. Overall, function 3 classified individuals correctly 68 percent of the time. When examining females, functions 1 and 2 correctly classified 50 percent of the sample, and function 4 correctly assessed 84 percent of the sample. Discriminant function 4 correctly classified males 30 prcent of the time, and functions 1, 2, 3, and 5 correctly classified 89 percent of the time. Based on these findings, this study recommends that practitioners use function 3 for highest accuracy due to its performance when sex is unknown. Functions 1, 2, 4, and 5 have a lower success rate and should be further tested. (publisher abstract modified)
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2016-DN-BX-0155


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Research (Applied/Empirical)
                                Report (Study/Research)
                                Report (Grant Sponsored)
                                Program/Project Description


  
  
        
  Award
        Initiation of a Gunshot Wound Trauma Atlas From Cranial Bone
    
  
  
Date Published: January 1, 2019
    
          Downloads
        
                      HTML

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Bone analysis
        Forensic sciences
        Investigative techniques
        National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
        NIJ Grant-related Documents



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Commentary On: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in Probabilistic Genotyping of Low Template DNA: A Case Study Comparing STRmixTM and TrueAlleleTM
                  Notes from the Field: Cluster of Severe Illness from Neptune’s Fix Tianeptine Linked to Synthetic Cannabinoids — New Jersey, June–November 2023
                  Just Science Podcast: Just Lessons Learned in Forensic Technology Transition
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov