alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

EXHIBIT 31.1

                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Pankey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Long Beach Acceptance Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Long Beach Acceptance Auto Receivables Trust 2006-A (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and
based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the
servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of
Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-back securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

Date: March 29, 2007

By: Long Beach Acceptance Corp., as Servicer

/s/ Michael J. Pankey
----------------------------------
        Michael J. Pankey
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer
```
**Exhibit 21.0**

 

**Subsidiaries**

 
| ** **                               | ** ** | **Percentage** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction or**        | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                               | ** ** | **Ownership**  | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** | ** ** |
| **Registrant**                           |       |           |       |                       |       |
|                                     |       |           |       |                       |       |
| Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.             |       |           |       |                       |       |
|                                     |       |           |       |                       |       |
| **Subsidiaries**                         |       |           |       |                       |       |
|                                     |       |           |       |                       |       |
| Fox Chase Bank                           |       | 100%           |       | United States              |       |
|                                     |       |           |       |                       |       |
| Fox Chase Financial, Inc. (1)  |       | 100%           |       | Delaware                   |       |

----

(1)    Whollyowned subsidiary of Fox Chase Bank.

 

 

----
#### Dyshum Michael JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary MAYNARD; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-7326.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Dyshum Michael Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dyshum Michael Jones, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Jones has not made the requisite showing. *See Jones v. Maynard,*No. CA-02-2321 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 19, 2002; entered Sept. 20, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 10.1



Exhibit 10.1


	
BRITISH COLUMBIA
	
Ministry of Energy and Mines, Energy and Minerals Division - Mineral Titles Branch

	 	
RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM

	 	
Mineral Tenure Act, Section 27

	 	 
	
Mining Division
	 	
Tenure No.
	
406361

	 	 	 	 
	
Gold Commissioner
	 	
Date of Record
	 
	 	
	
	

	 	
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY

	 	 
	
APPLICATION
	
I, Lloyd Tattersall
	
AGENT FOR
	
Glengarry Development Corp.

	
TO RECORD
	
BOX 1365 150 Mile House
	 	
BOX 27073-1365 Marine Dr.

	
A
	
B.C.
	 	
West Vancouver, B.C.

	
2 POST
	
V0X 2G0
	
(250) 243-2425
	 	
V7T 2X8
	
(604) 922-6998

	
CLAIM
	
Client Number
	
126457
	 	
Client Number
	
145065

	 	
Hereby apply for a record of a 2 post claim for the location as outlined on this attached copy of mineral titles reference

	 	
map number(s)
	
#93A053, in the Cariboo Mining Division.

	
	

	
ACCESS
	
Describe how you gained acces to the location; include reference to roadsd, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the intial post location.

	 	
Take the Mitchel Bay Rd., From Gavin Lake, I. P. is 2,200 M NorthEast of where the Hamaltine Creek crosses the Mitchel Bay Rd.

	 	
GPS Co-ordination taken of posts:
	
Yes:
	 	
No:
	
X
	
If yes, complete information on chard on reverse.

	 	 	 	 
	
TAG
	
I have securely affixed the person of the metal identification tag
	 	
I have securely affixed the person of the metal identification tag

	
INFORMATION
	
endorsed AINITIAL POST (No. 1)@ to the initial post and
	 	
endorsed AFINAL POST (No. 2)@ to the initial post and

	 	
impressed this information on the tag
	 	
impressed this information on the tag

	 	
Tag Number 722305 M
	 	
Tag Number 722305

	 	 	
INITIAL POST (No. 1)
	 	 	
FINAL POST (No. 2)

	 	
CLAIM NAME
	
K9
	 	
CLAIM NAME
	
K9

	 	
LOCATOR
	
Lloyd Tattersall
	 	
LOCATOR
	
Lloyd Tattersall

	 	
AGENT FOR
	
Glengarry Development Corp.
	 	
AGENT FOR
	
Glengarry Development Corp.

	 	
DATE COMMENCED
	
October 30, 2003
	 	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500 M

	 	
DATE COMMENCED
	
2:00PM
	 	
DATE COMPLETED
	
October 30, 2003

	 	
**DIR. TO F.P.
	
90%
	 	
TIME COMPLETED
	
3:00PM

	 	
METRES TO RIGHT
	 	 	
If witness post was placed for the legal corner post:

Bearing and distance from the witness post to true position of final post, exactly as written on the witness post is ___ degrees, _____ metres.

	 	
METRES TO LEFT
	
500
	 
	 	
** ADirection@ means a bearing measureed between 0o and 360o, where 0o is the bearing of true north.
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
Acknowledgments
	
I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final posts (and witness and identification post if applicable) are indicated. The tag information supplied above to the indentical information that I impressed upon the tags affixed to the applicable post when located this claim, and this information is true and correct.
	 
	 	 	
[FILE STAMP]

	 	
/s/ Lloyd Tattersall
	 
	 	
Signature of Locator
1

Filed 7/6/23 P. v. Balbuena CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CARLINE BALBUENA,

Defendant and Appellant. C097678

(Super. Ct. No. 05F11542)

Defendant Carline Balbuena appeals the trial court’s denial of her petition for

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. 1 Appointed counsel filed a brief raising

no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 or People v. Wende

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. Effective June 30, 2022, the

Legislature renumbered former section 1170.95 to section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58,

§ 10.) There were no substantive changes to the statute. Defendant filed h er petition

under former section 1170.95, but we will cite to the current section 1172.6 throughout

this opinion.2

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and requesting we exercise our discretion to review the entire

record for arguable issues on appeal.

DISC USSION

On April 14 , 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel had filed a brief indicating

no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an order

denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent

review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in People v.

Delgadillo , defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising

any argument s he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if we

did not receive a letter or brief within that 30

- day period, the court may dismiss the

appeal as abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed

, and we have received no

communication from defendant.

We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.

( People v. Delgadillo

, supra

, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)3 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

/s/

HORST, J. 

We concur:

/s/

ROBIE, Acting P. J.

/s/

HULL, J.

 Judge of the Placer County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
OF J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF APRIL 26, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1997
<CASH>                                           2,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                        94
<INVENTORY>                                      5,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,926
<PP&E>                                           7,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,135
<BONDS>                                          7,538
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        558
<COMMON>                                         2,667
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,536
<SALES>                                          6,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,705
<CGS>                                            4,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    98
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    53
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    228
<INCOME-TAX>                                        89
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Bradford, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, (Miller, J.), rendered July 2, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Prior to trial, the hearing court granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress an inculpatory statement he made to the police on the ground that it was obtained in violation of his right to counsel. Consequently, the court ordered redaction of the defendant’s name from the statement the codefendant Leonis West made to the arresting detective, which was admitted into evidence at their joint trial. On appeal, the defendant contends that the admission of West’s redacted confession was a violation of his right of confrontation because when taken in conjunction with the direct testimony of the arresting detective, it unmistakably identified him as one of the accomplices implicated by West in his statement. A review of this record indicates that almost immediately after testifying that West admitted to him that his accomplices were "Shallah, blank [the redacted reference to the defendant] and Joe”, the detective additionally testified that after West made this statement to him, West led him to the defendant’s residence and that when the defendant appeared, the detective placed him under arrest. This testimony, which raised the inference that West, who did not testify, had identified the defendant, was impermissible hearsay *(see, People v Cummings,*109 AD2d 748). Nevertheless, we consider this error harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, which, *inter alia,*consisted of a lineup and in-court identification of the defendant by an eyewitness who had seen the defendant in the neighborhood where the incident occurred on various occasions prior to the incident *(see, People v Smalls,*55 NY2d 407). We note additionally that these identifications made the case against the defendant considerably stronger than that against the codefendant West *402which was described by the Court of Appeals as "strong” *(see, People v West,*72 NY2d 941).

While the prosecutor’s summation did contain some improper and potentially prejudicial remarks, the trial court’s prompt curative instructions served to correct these improprieties *(see, People v West,*137 AD2d 855, *affd*72 NY2d 941, *supra; People v Berg,*59 NY2d 294).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Preformed Line Products Company for
the period ended March 31, 2011 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Preformed Line
Products Company.
 May 6, 2011
    
    /s/ Robert G. Ruhlman

Robert G. Ruhlman 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         126,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  417,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    818,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,398,198
<PP&E>                                         823,013
<DEPRECIATION>                               (320,505)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,065,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          825,041
<BONDS>                                     15,673,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              240
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,819,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,065,619
<SALES>                                        745,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               745,706
<CGS>                                          487,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  487,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               229,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,339)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2019

No. 04-18-00793-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Anthony Otis STRAIT,

Appellee

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10177CR

Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on January 30, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of January, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brown & Brown, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Cory T. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. § 78m or § 78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 6, 2009





/s/ Cory T. Walker


Cory T. Walker


Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20224]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory 
committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), 
Executive Subcommittee Meeting.
    Time and Date: September 17, 2008, 12:45 p.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Room 505A, Washington, DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The Executive Subcommittee will hold a strategic 
planning session, looking at roadmaps and plans for future 
activities including the 60th Anniversary of the NCHS.
    Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program 
information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of 
Committee members may be obtained from Marjorie S. Greenberg, 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 
2402, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. 
Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web 
site: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further information including 
an agenda will be posted when available.
    Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the 
CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) 
as soon as possible.

    Dated: August 25, 2008.
James Scanlon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science and Data Policy, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. E8-20224 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-P