alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1392-000]


Fowler Ridge III Wind Farm LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 21, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Fowler Ridge III Wind Farm LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is September 11, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="763033243539181a1f181325030606190402361013041558111900">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19928 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emelio Morelli, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6027
THURMAN BRADFORD HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusRON ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-450-2) Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: July 18, 1996 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thurman Bradford Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Angelone , No. CA-95-450-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995). To the extent that therecord on appeal contains transcripts of Appellant's trial and sentencing hearing, we grant his motion for review of those documents.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT (10)(a) 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information and to use
of our reports: (1) dated April 28, 2014, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio and (2) dated April 28, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts
of the WRL Series Annuity Account, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the Registration Statement
 (Form N-4, No. 033-49558) and related Prospectus of WRL Freedom Conquerer. 

 

			
	 Des Moines, IA
 April 28, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6572 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6572

To amend the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 to 
provide for the addition of certain equipment and services produced or 
  provided by DJI Technologies to the list of covered communications 
equipment or services published under such Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2022

 Ms. Stefanik (for herself, Mr. Gallagher, and Ms. Tenney) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 to 
provide for the addition of certain equipment and services produced or 
  provided by DJI Technologies to the list of covered communications 
equipment or services published under such Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Countering CCP Drones Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES OF DJI TECHNOLOGIES 
              TO COVERED LIST.

    (a) In General.--Section 2(c) of the Secure and Trusted 
Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1601(c)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) The communications equipment or service being--
                    ``(A) telecommunications or video surveillance 
                equipment produced by Shenzhen Da-Jiang Innovations 
                Sciences and Technologies Company Limited (commonly 
                known as `DJI Technologies') (or any subsidiary or 
                affiliate thereof); or
                    ``(B) telecommunications or video surveillance 
                services provided by an entity described in 
                subparagraph (A) or using equipment described in such 
                subparagraph.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 2 of the Secure and Trusted 
Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1601) is amended by 
striking ``paragraphs (1) through (4)'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``paragraphs (1) through (5)''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6720 

To authorize the Thomas Paine Memorial Association to establish a commemorative work in the District of Columbia and its environs, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2022 

Mr. RASKIN (for himself, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. NADLER, Ms. 

DEAN, Mr. CASTEN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. POCAN, and Mr. DESAULNIER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Thomas Paine Memorial Association to 

establish a commemorative work in the District of Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF THOMAS PAINE COM4 MEMORATIVE WORK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Thomas Paine Memorial As6 sociation may establish a commemorative work on Federal 

7 land in the District of Columbia and its environs to honor 

8 the United States patriot, Thomas Paine. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6720 IH

1 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO2 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the commemora3 tive work under this section shall be in accordance with 

4 chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly 

5 known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’). 

6 (c) PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL

7 FUNDS.—Federal funds may not be used to pay any ex8 pense of the establishment of the commemorative work 

9 under this section. 

10 (d) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—If upon payment of all ex12 penses for the establishment of the commemorative 

13 work (including the maintenance and preservation 

14 amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, 

15 United States Code), there remains a balance of 

16 funds received for such establishment, the Thomas 

17 Paine Memorial Association shall transmit the 

18 amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Inte19 rior for deposit in the account provided for in sec20 tion 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code. 

21 (2) ON EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—If upon 

22 expiration of the authority for the commemorative 

23 work under section 8903(e) of title 40, United 

24 States Code, there remains a balance of funds re25 ceived for the establishment of the commemorative 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6720 IH

1 work, the Thomas Paine Memorial Association shall 

2 transmit the amount of the balance to a separate ac3 count with the National Park Foundation for memo4 rials, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior 

5 or the Administrator of General Services (as appro6 priate) following the process provided in section 

7 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States Code, for ac8 counts established under paragraphs (2) and (3) of 

9 section 8906(b) of title 40, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
J-A14001-15

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

CHERLENE GUDALEFSKY,

 Appellant

v.

DR. JOHN NIPPLE, PHYSICIAN WITH 

COMMUNITY GENERAL OSTEOPATHIC 

HOSPITAL,

 Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1696 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Order September 8, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County

Civil Division at No(s): 2013-CV-10101-MM

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., JENKINS, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.*

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED JUNE 16, 2015

I concur in the result because the Majority is correct that Womer v. 

Hilliker, 908 A.2d 269 (Pa. 2006) controls.

I write separately because I believe the result in Womer is very 

harsh, as Justice Baer’s dissent points out. In that case, while a certificate 

of merit was not timely filed, the defendant received more from the plaintiff 

than what a certificate of merit would have provided. The certificate of merit 

is merely the plaintiff or attorney stating, in essence: “I have a report from 

a licensed professional that the defendant breached the standard of care and 

that breach was a cause of the plaintiff’s harm.” In Womer, the plaintiff’s 

attorney had supplied the defendant with an actual report from an expert 

doctor. Likewise, in the instant case, the plaintiff supplied an actual report 
J-A14001-15

- 2 -

from a doctor. Neither the Womer defendant nor the instant defendant was 

prejudiced in the slightest by the absence of a certificate of merit. Rather, 

both benefitted from having the actual report.

Therefore, I reluctantly concur in the result.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



     <ARTICLE> 5
     <LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
     OF J. C. PENNEY FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF OCTOBER 30, 1999, AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
     </LEGEND>
     <MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

     <S>                             <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
     <PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
     <CASH>                                               1
     <SECURITIES>                                         0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                    4,481
     <ALLOWANCES>                                         0
     <INVENTORY>                                          0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,482
     <PP&E>                                               0
     <DEPRECIATION>                                       0
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,482
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,260
     <BONDS>                                              0
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
     <PREFERRED>                                          0
     <COMMON>                                           145
     <OTHER-SE>                                       1,077
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,482
     <SALES>                                              0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
     <CGS>                                                0
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (54)
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                     54
     <INCOME-TAX>                                        19
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 35
     <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
     <CHANGES>                                            0
     <NET-INCOME>                                        35
     <EPS-BASIC>                                        0
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                 --------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                         Date of Report: March 26, 2001
                        (Date of earliest event reported)


                       CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                             (Packager and Servicer)
    (Issuer in Respect of the REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-4)
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 Delaware                     333-72459                     13-3408713
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other juris-       (Commission                 (I.R.S. Employer
diction of organization)      File Nos.)                 Identification No.)


12855 North Outer Forty Drive, St. Louis, Missouri            63141
--------------------------------------------------            -----
   (Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)


Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code (314) 851-6305
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)


<PAGE>

Item 5.        Other Events.

      Attached as Exhibit 8.4 is the opinion of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
with respect to certain tax matters relating to the Issuer's REMIC Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2001-4, including their consent.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                            CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                                            (Registrant)

                                           By: /s/ Howard Darmstadter
                                               -------------------------
                                                   Howard Darmstadter
                                                   Assistant Secretary


Dated: March 26, 2001
'. '• 

### STATE OF TEXAS
vs. BARRY LYNN MCCURTAIN 199-82933-2014 

### § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

### § § 199th JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

### § § COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Now comes BARRY LYNN MCCURTAIN, Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause, and gives this written notice ofappeal to the CourtofAppeals ofthe State ofTexas from the judgment ofconviction and sentence herein rendered against BARRY LYNN MCCURTAIN. Respectfully submitted,
Law Offices ofBiederman & Burleson PLLC 2591 Dallas Parkway, #207 Frisco, TX 75034 (469) 252-4018- Tel (800) 933-0891 -Fax

# By:~£-·- Daniel Moran State BarNo. 24075738 Attorney for Defendant


### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on July 23, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing document was served on the Collin County District Attorney's Office via hand delivery.

# ~Md£ 15 JUL 23 AN 8: 45 ANDREA STROI·i THOMPSON DISTRICT CLERK**CO~TY.** TEXAS 

### BY
. DEPUTY
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed the Annual Report of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -
15(e) and 15d - 15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the
Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in the Report any changes in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys fourth quarter of 2007
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to
the audit committee of the board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Michael H. Lee

Michael H. LeeChief Executive OfficerMarch 28, 2008
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-83,401-01
IN RE BRIAN DOUG LAS HIL L, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1238827-A IN THE 208TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 208th District Court of Har ri s C o u n t y , t h at more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order that desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has2

not f iled an application for a writ of habe as cor pus in Harr is County . Should the response include
an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitt ed with the response . This application for leave to fi le a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Jul y

8, 2015 Do not publish
Order entered June 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00898-CR

MICHAEL EDWARD HARSSEMA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80837-2018

ORDER

Before the Court are the State’s June 24, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file 

its tendered brief and motion to exceed the word count by 183 words. We GRANT the motions 

and ORDER the State’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000016415-MAR-201308:47 AM