alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2016

No. 04-15-00342-CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

and Implicity Management Company,

Appellants

v.

Mary WINTERS and Mila Cheatom,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-03926

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted Appellees’ first motion for extension of time to file the brief, Appellees’

brief was due on May 25, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b), (d). On the due date, Appellees

filed an unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file their brief until May 31, 2016. 

See id. R. 10.5(b). Appellees filed their brief on May 31, 2016.

Appellees’ motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellees’ brief is deemed 

timely filed.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE> 
                                                                 Exhibit 12 (b)
                             J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                           and Consolidated Subsidiaries
                                          
             Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Fixed Charges







                                                         52 weeks ended   
                                                ________________________________
                                                 Oct. 25                Oct. 26
   ($ Millions)                                   1997                   1996  
                                                _________           ____________

   Income from continuing operations             $     711           $    1,259
      (before income taxes and
      capitalized interest)

   Fixed charges

   Interest (including capitalized
   interest) on:

      Operating leases                                 110                  102
      Short term debt                                  122                  101
      Long term debt                                   473                  298
      Capital leases                                     7                    5
      Credit facility                                   19                    -
      Other, net                                       (14)                   4
                                                                               
                                                 ___________         ___________
   Total fixed charges                                 717                  510

                                                 ____________        ___________
        
   Total available income                        $    1,428          $    1,769 
                                                 ==========         ============
   Ratio of available income to combined
      fixed charges and preferred stock
      dividend requirement                              2.0                 3.5 
                                                 ===========         ===========


   The interest cost of the LESOP notes guaranteed by the Company is not
   included in fixed charges above.

   The Company believes that, due to the seasonal nature of its business, ratios
   for a period of time other than a 52 week period are inappropriate.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Cannabis Sativa, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Tobias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 1, 2019/s/ David TobiasDavid TobiasChief Executive Officer
185 La. 1043

#### STATE v. WILDER.

No. 34100.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 30, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 21,1936.

Lester Wilson and Isaac Abramson, both of Shreveport, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen.,' James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. *440Galloway, Dist. Atty., and John R. Pleasant, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport, for the State.

ROGERS, Justice..

The appellant, Grady Wilder, was charged by affidavit in the juvenile court for the parish of Caddo with contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. He was tried on the charge, found guilty, and sentenced to serve twelve months in the parish jail.

No question of law is presented by the appeal. The record contains no bill of exception) no motion for a new trial, no motion in arrest of judgment, no assignment of errors, and no error patent upon •its face. Therefore, this court must affirm the judgment. City of Shreveport v. Jones, 172 La. 833, 135 So. 373.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ----------------------------------------------

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Petrol  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ended  September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been  provided to Petrol  Industries,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Petrol Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: January 23, 2006              /s/ David Taylor
                                     ----------------
                                     David A. Taylor
                                     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                     Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6386 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, as the ‘‘Veterans 

of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2022 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI (for himself, Ms. NEWMAN, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of 

Illinois, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. KINZINGER, Mr. 

BOST, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. CASTEN, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

FOSTER, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. QUIGLEY, 

Mr. RUSH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. UNDERWOOD, and Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VETERANS OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN MEMO4 RIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6386 IH

1 Schaumburg, Illinois, shall be known and designated as 

2 the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Of3 fice Building’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

7 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and 

8 Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6624 

To authorize the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue (United States-European 

Union Interparliamentary Group), and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2022 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. KEATING, and Mrs. WAGNER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue (United 

States-European Union Interparliamentary Group), and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transatlantic Legisla5 tors’ Dialogue Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSATLANTIC LEGISLATORS’ DIALOGUE (UNITED 

7 STATES-EUROPEAN UNION INTER8 PARLIAMENTARY GROUP). 

9 (a) ESTABLISHMENT AND MEETINGS.— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6624 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not to exceed 24 Members 

2 of Congress shall be appointed to meet not less than 

3 twice annually with representatives of the European 

4 Parliament for discussions of common problems in 

5 the interest of relations between the United States 

6 and the European Union. 

7 (2) REFERENCE.—The Members of Congress 

8 appointed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be re9 ferred to as the ‘‘United States Delegation’’ of the 

10 Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue (United States11 European Union Interparliamentary Group). 

12 (b) APPOINTMENT AND MEMBERS.—Of the Members 

13 of Congress appointed for purposes of this section— 

14 (1) half shall be appointed by the Speaker of 

15 the House of Representatives, in consultation with 

16 the minority leader of the House, from among Mem17 bers of the House (not less than 4 of whom shall be 

18 members of the Committee on Foreign Affairs); and 

19 (2) half shall be appointed by the President Pro 

20 Tempore of the Senate, upon recommendations of 

21 the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, 

22 from among Members of the Senate (not less than 

23 4 of whom shall be members of the Committee on 

24 Foreign Relations) unless the majority and minority 

25 leaders of the Senate determine otherwise. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6624 IH

1 (c) CHAIRPERSON AND RANKING MEMBER.— 

2 (1) HOUSE.—The Chair and Vice Chair of the 

3 House Group shall be designated by the Speaker of 

4 the House of Representatives, in consultation with 

5 the minority leader of the House. 

6 (2) SENATE.—The President Pro Tempore of 

7 the Senate shall designate the Chair or Vice Chair 

8 of the Senate group of the United States Delegation. 

9 (d) REPORT.—The United States group shall submit 

10 to the Congress a report for each fiscal year for which 

11 an appropriation is made for the United States Delega12 tion, which shall include its expenditures under such ap13 propriation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Maimouna KOUYATE, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 02-1531.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 24, 2002.

Decided Nov. 18, 2002.

Diane McHugh Martinez, Law Office of McHugh Martinez, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Senior Litigation, Michael T. Dougherty, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Maimouna Kouyate, a citizen of Guinea, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming, without opin-ion, the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of her application for asy-lum and withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the administrative record and the IJ’s decision, which was designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Kouyate failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution necessary to qualify for relief from deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994); *8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b) (2002). We have reviewed the IJ’s credibility determinations and con-clude that they are supported by specific, cogent reasoning, and there-fore are entitled to substantial deference. *See Figeroa v. INS,*886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir.1989). We conclude that the record supports the IJ’s conclusion that Kouyate failed to establish her eligibility for asylum.

The standard for receiving withholding of deportation is “more stringent than that *182for asylum eligibility.” *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999). An applicant for withholding must demonstrate a clear probability of persecution. *INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987). As Kouyate has failed to establish refugee status, she cannot satisfy the higher standard for withholding of deportation.

Kouyate asserts that the Board’s use of the streamlined review pro-cedure set forth in 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) (2002), resulted in a denial of due process. As Kouyate fails to establish prejudice from the Board’s use of that procedure, *see Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 324-25 (4th Cir.2002), she is entitled to no relief on the claim.

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 We note that 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) was repealed by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub.L. No. 104-128, 110 Stat. 3009 (IIR-IRA), effective April 1, 1997. Because this case was in transition at the time the IIRIRA was passed, § 1105a(a)(4) is still applicable here under the terms of the tran-sitional rules contained in § 309(c) of the IIRIRA.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Depositor:       Structured Asset Securities Corporation
                 Attention: Mortgage Finance LXS 2006-7
                 745 7th Avenue, 7th Floor
                 New York, NY 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
                 Chris Baker
                 327 Inverness Drive South
                 Englewood, CO 80112

Trustee:         Citibank, N.A.
Attention:       Structured Finance LXS 2006-7
                 111 Wall Street, 14th Floor, Zone 3
                 New York, NY 10005

Subject:         Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:     2006
Investor Code:   F44
Investor Name:   LXS 2006-7

I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar
Year 2006:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement for
such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects
throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have
specifically identified to the Master Servicer, the Depositor, and the
Trustee each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof,
including the steps being taken by the Servicer to remedy such default.



                           Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

                                         By /s/ Terry L. Gentry
                                            ----------------------
                                         Name: Terry L. Gentry
                                         Title: Managing Director
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Dawn Hammond, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2006-2 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, EMC Mortgage Corporation
     as Servicer, EverHome Mortgage Company, as Servicer, Harborside Mortgage
     Corporation, as Servicer, HomeBanc Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC
     Mortgage Corporation, USA, as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation, as
     Servicer, Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer and Waterfield
     Mortgage Company, Incorporated, as Servicer.


     Dated: July 10, 2008

     /s/ Dawn Hammond
     Signature

     Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
#### Christopher A. GRANSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-6902.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.

Decided Aug. 22, 2003.

*989Christopher A. Gransby, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Christopher A. Gransby seeks to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice for his failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 1998 and the consolidated
statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,786    
<SECURITIES>                                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0    
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0    
<INVENTORY>                                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0    
<PP&E>                                               0    
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 473,419    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0    
<BONDS>                                         20,000    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0    
<PREFERRED>                                          0    
<COMMON>                                        31,952    
<OTHER-SE>                                     376,761    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   473,419    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,472    
<CGS>                                                0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,327    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 832    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,313    
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,943    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,370    
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0    
<CHANGES>                                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,370    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98 
         

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32(b)****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Henry G. Schopfer, III., Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”), certify,that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the Report.                                                        /s/ Henry G. Schopfer, III   Henry G. Schopfer, III   Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 14, 2005  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.*