alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.24 - DirectorCompensation




Exhibit 10.24




Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc.
Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Directors


Under our 2014 compensation program for non-employee directors, we pay our non-employee directors an annual fee of $40,000 for their services as directors, payable in quarterly installments of $10,000 each. In addition, each director who is unaffiliated with Oaktree and MTS (each, an “Unaffiliated Director”) will receive automatically a restricted stock unit award on December 31, 2014 with a number of units calculated as $140,000, divided by the average share price of our Common Stock over the 15-day period preceding the grant date, rounded down to the nearest whole unit. This restricted stock unit award will vest on December 31, 2015 if the Unaffiliated Director continues his service with us through that date. Each of Messrs. Bendikson, Harmon and Lane (the “Oaktree/MTS Directors”) receive cash compensation of $140,000 for his Board service during 2014. 
Our directors also received the following retainers for their service on committees of the Board of Directors and for serving as a chair of a committee: 
 
	
				
	Committee Chair Retainers
	 

	Audit
	$
	30,000
	


	Compensation
	5,000
	


	Nominating and Corporate Governance
	5,000
	


	 
	 

	Committee Member Retainers
	 
	


	Audit
	15,000
	


	Compensation
	5,000
	


	Nominating and Corporate Governance
	5,000
	





Pursuant to his offer letter from May 31, 2012, Mr. Buckelew is also entitled to director compensation for his services as Chairman of the Board for the period following the appointment of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Percy C. Tomlinson, on October 1, 2013. A summary of Mr. Buckelew’s offer letter is included in our proxy statement for the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. 
As in prior years, non-employee directors received reimbursement of travel expenses related to their Board service.
We have established a directors’ deferred compensation plan for all non-employee directors. No directors elected to participate in the directors’ deferred compensation plan in 2013 or 2014, and only Mr. Dimick has an account balance under the directors’ deferred compensation plan. Upon retirement, separation from the Board or the occurrence of a change of control event, Mr. Dimick has the option of being paid cash or receiving common stock for his phantom shares.
Exhibit 10.24

September 5, 2007

Ms. Karen H. Bechtel

Managing Director

The Carlyle Group

520 Madison Avenue, 41stFloor

New York, New York 10022

Dear Karen:

The purpose of this letter is to outline the specific terms of my engagement with The Carlyle Group (Carlyle) to review and serve as interim
CEO for LifeCare Holdings, Inc (LifeCare or the Company).

Services to be Rendered

I will perform a review of LifeCares operating and financial systems and will make periodic recommendations to you based upon the results of my review. I will also
serve as CEO for the company on an interim basis and will perform all the functions of a CEO that are traditionally associated with that position. I will also serve on the Board of Directors of the Company.

Fees and Expenses

As compensation for the services provided by me, I
will be paid (by LifeCare) $1500/day, including travel time, and I will be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred by me in connection with providing the services. I will submit bi-weekly invoices summarizing the time expended and will
provide documentation of expenses incurred.

Termination

You may terminate this engagement, with or without cause, upon 30 days written or verbal notice. I may terminate this engagement, with or without cause, upon 60 days written or verbal notice.

Confidentiality

All non-public information received by me will be
treated as confidential and will not be used by me for any purposes other than the performance of the services to be rendered by me pursuant to this engagement unless you should otherwise approve such purposes.



---

Engagement Letter

The
Carlyle Group

September 5, 2007

Page 2 of 2

Indemnification

You agree to indemnify and hold me harmless from
and against any claims, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) which may arise out of actions or omissions on my part acting in good faith on Carlyles or LifeCares behalf.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please acknowledge so by executing a copy of this engagement letter and returning one copy to me. I appreciate this opportunity to
provide services to The Carlyle Group.

Very truly yours,



|                     |  |  |  |  |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | 
|WILLIAM HAMBURG     
|                    
|/s/ WILLIAM HAMBURG 
|Name                
|                    
|AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
|                     |  | 
|THE CARLYLE GROUP    |  |  |  | 

|      |  |                      |  |  |  |         
|----- |  | -------------------- |  |  |  | --------
|      |  |                      | 
|      |  | /s/ Karen H. Bechtel |  |  |  | 9/6/2007
|Name  |  | Karen H. Bechtel     |  |  |  | Date    
|Title |  | Managing Director    |  |  |  |
#### Gerald R. BROOKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary RAFFERETY; Robert Shaw, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 02-15537.

D.C. No. CV-00-00552-VRW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 21, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerald R. Brookins appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of highway patrol officers in Brookins’ 42 U. S.C. § 1983 action arising from his detention and arrest for driving with tinted windows. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the grant of summary judgment. *Mitchell v. Los Angeles Cmty. College Dist,*861 F.2d 198, 201 (9th Cir.1988). We affirm.

Because Officer Shaw had probable cause to believe that Brookins’ window tint was unlawful, the district court properly granted summary judgment on his claims that the stop, arrest, and search violated the Fourth Amendment, and on his claims for false arrest and false imprisonment under state law. *See Atwater v. City of Lago Vista,*532 U.S. 318, 354, 121 S.Ct. 1536, 149 L.Ed.2d 549 (2001) (upholding custodial arrest for traffic violations); *George v. City of Long Beach,*973 F.2d 706, 710 (9th Cir.1992).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on his excessive force claims because Brookins refused to cooperate with the officers, did not complain about the handcuffs for 45 to 50 minutes, and suffered only de minimus injury. *See White by White v. Pierce County,*797 F.2d 812, 816 (9th Cir.1986) (finding reasonable the use of force where the plaintiff was resisting the officers and the extent of the injury inflicted was slight). Furthermore, summary judgment was proper on Brookins’ related state law intentional infliction of emotional distress claim because there was *no*evidence *of*intent or reckless disregard. *See Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.,*187 Cal.App.3d 1463, 1487, 232 Cal.Rptr. 668 (1986).

The district court also properly granted summary judgment on Brookins’ Equal Protection claim because Brookins produced no evidence that similarly situated individuals of another race were not stopped for possible traffic violations. *See United States v. Armstrong,*517 U.S. 456, 465, 116 S.Ct. 1480, 134 L.Ed.2d 687 (1996). Finally, summary judgment was proper on Brookins’ tort claim of reckless endangerment because there is no tort *984claim of reckless endangerment under California law and Brookins failed to allege facts entitling him to some form of relief. *See Sparling v. Hoffman Constr. Co.,*864 F.2d 635, 640 (9th Cir.1988).

Brookins’ remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20046

Conference Calendar

__________________

RALPH WESLEY ROGERS, SR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD TRINCI ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-93-0068

- - - - - - - - - -

June 28, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ralph Wesley Rogers, Sr., has not shown that the change in

lifting restriction was a wanton action that Dr. Berry knew or

should have known would cause a substantial risk to his health. 

See Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1981 (1994).

With respect to the claim of retaliation, it is well settled

that an inmate may not be retaliated against because he exercises

his right to access to the courts. Gibbs v. King, 779 F.2d 1040,

1046 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 (1986). However, if
No. 95-20046

-2-

the conduct alleged to constitute retaliation does not, by

itself, raise the inference that such conduct was retaliatory,

the assertion of the claim itself without supporting facts is

insufficient. Whittington v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 818, 819 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 840 (1988). 

Rogers has not sufficiently alleged deliberate indifference

to his serious medical needs resulting from his medical

classification and resultant work assignment; therefore he has

not alleged conduct that would raise an inference of retaliatory

conduct. Other than his bare assertions, Rogers provided no

facts to suggest that his medical treatment and work assignments

were in any way connected to his legal activities. 

AFFIRMED.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





Wilshire
      Credit Corporation


14523
      SW
      Millikan Way


Suite
      200


Beaverton,
      Oregon 97005





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-AR1





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of April 1, 2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wilshire Credit
      Corporation, as servicer and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
      relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-AR1





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
EXHIBIT 12-2

                                    PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                                      AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
                                                     SEC METHOD
                                                       ($000)
                                                     
                                                     3 MONTHS
                                                       ENDED
                                                     03/31/97
                                                     --------

NET INCOME                                           $112,999

ADD BACK:
- INCOME TAXES:
     OPERATING INCOME                                  93,566
     NON-OPERATING INCOME                              (1,879)
                                                       -------
     NET TAXES                                         91,687

- FIXED CHARGES:
     INTEREST APPLICABLE TO DEBT                       89,384
     ANNUAL RENTALS                                     1,995
                                                      -------
     TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                               91,379

EARNINGS REQUIRED FOR PREFERRED DIVIDENDS:
     DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK                       4,509
     ADJUSTMENT TO PREFERRED DIVIDENDS*                 3,659
                                                      -------
                                                        8,168

FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                 $99,547
                                                      =======

EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND
     FIXED CHARGES                                   $296,065
                                                     ========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
     AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS           2.97
                                                         ====

 * ADDITIONAL CHARGE EQUIVALENT TO EARNINGS REQUIRED
   TO ADJUST DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK TO A PRE-TAX BASIS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     (THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000077231                    
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA ENTERPRISES INC.               
                                  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      274,406,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    26,021,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         63,904,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       39,039,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 403,370,000
<COMMON>                                       50,634,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      30,711,000   
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            43,822,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 125,167,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          560,000
<PREFERRED>                                    4,839,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           95,000,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             3,270,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  67,697,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      11,057,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 95,780,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  403,370,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      139,660,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           1,365,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     128,449,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     129,814,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        9,846,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             1,570,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 11,416,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       8,018,000
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,398,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    961,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  2,437,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       8,926,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         13,851,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24
        


</TABLE>
Brief Stricken and Order filed April 9, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00229-CR

____________

SHANNON BERNARD JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 56th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-CR-3031

ORDER

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief. The brief discloses the 

name of a child victim of sexual assault under the age of 17. See Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. art. 57.02(h); Tex. R. App. P. 9.10(b). Accordingly, the brief is STRICKEN. 

Appellant’s counsel is ordered to file a brief that complies with Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure article 57.02 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.10 on 

or before April 20, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Dawn Hammond, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2006-3 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Bank of America, National Association, as Servicer, Chase Home Finance
     LLC, as Sub-Servicer, Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B., as Servicer, Countrywide
     Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, EMC Mortgage Corporation, as
     Servicer, EverHome Mortgage Company, as Servicer, First Horizon Home Loan
     Corporation, as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage
     Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as Servicer,
     Harborside Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, HomeBanc Mortgage
     Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Mortgage Corporation, USA, as, Servicer,
     JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Named Servicer, MidAmerica Bank, FSB, as
     Servicer, Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation, as Servicer and PHH Mortgage
     Corporation, as Servicer.


     Dated: July 10, 2008

     /s/ Dawn Hammond
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
     servicer)
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending April 30, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gregory J. Young, President & Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

#  

# (1)     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)     The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory  J. Young                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |
| April 8, 2008                     |

 

----