Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Notices 50939 

companies will be the rates shown 

above; (2) for previously investigated 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, or the 

LTFV investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 5.95 

percent, the ‘‘all-others’’ rate established 

in the LTFV investigation. These 

deposit requirements shall remain in 

effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility, 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of review in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: August 25, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix—Issues in Decision 

Memorandum 

General Issues 

1. Offsets for Negative Margins 

2. Classification of U.S. Warehousing 

Expenses as Movement or Selling 

Expenses 

Company-Specific Issues 

3. U.S. Sales for which Pakfood Public 

Company Ltd. (Pakfood) Did Not Report 

Entered Value 

4. Universe of U.S. Sales for Pakfood 

5. CEP Offset for Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd., 

Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd., 

Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd., EuroAsian International Seafoods Co., Ltd., 

Intersia Foods Co., Ltd., Phattana 

Seafood Co., Ltd., Phattana Frozen Food 

Co., Ltd., S.C.C. Frozen Seafood Co., 

Ltd., Seawealth Frozen Food Co., Ltd., 

Thailand Fishery Cold Storage Public 

Co., Ltd., Thai International Seafoods 

Co., Ltd., and Wales & Co. Universe 

Limited (collectively ‘‘the Rubicon 

Group’’) 

6. Certain Selling Expenses for the Rubicon 

Group 

7. Certain Clerical Errors for the Rubicon 

Group 

8. CEP Profit Calculation for Thai I-Mei 

Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. (Thai I-Mei) 

9. CEP Offset for Thai I-Mei 

10. Calculation of Assessment Rate for Thai 

I-Mei 

11. Constructed Value (CV) Inventory 

Carrying Costs for Thai I-Mei 

12. Universe of Reviewed U.S. Sales for Thai 

I-Mei 

13. Application of Adverse Facts Available 

(AFA) for Thai Union Frozen Products 

Public Co., Ltd. (TUF), Thai Union 

Seafood Co., Ltd. (TUS), (collectively 

‘‘Thai Union’’) on Unreported CEP Sales 

14. Application of AFA for Thai Union’s 

Unreported EP Sales 

15. Selection of the AFA Rate for Thai Union 

and the U.S. Sales Value to Which the 

AFA Rate Was Applied 

16. CEP Offset for Thai Union 

17. U.S. Warehousing Expenses for Thai 

Union 

18. U.S. Freight Expenses for Thai Union 

19. U.S. Discounts for Thai Union 

20. Total Cost of Manufacturing Calculation 

for Thai Union 

[FR Doc. E8–20165 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 29, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

Begnal or Toni Dach, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1442 and (202) 

482–1655, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 4, 2008, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published the preliminary results of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China, covering the period March 1, 

2006, through February 28, 2007. See 

Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission, 73 FR 

18503 (April 4, 2008). On July 15, 2008, 

the Department published a notice 

extending the time limit for the final 

results of this review by 30 days. See 

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Glycine from the 

People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 40480 

(July 15, 2008). 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations, the 

Department shall issue the preliminary 

results of an administrative review 

within 245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of the date of 

publication of the order. The Act and 

the regulations further provide that the 

Department shall issue the final results 

of review within 120 days after the date 

on which the notice of the preliminary 

results was published in the Federal 

Register. See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and section 351.213(h)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations. However, if 

the Department determines that it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 

351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s 

regulations allow the Department to 

extend the 245-day period to 365 days 

and the 120-day period to 180 days. 

On April 30, 2008, the Department 

extended the deadlines for parties to 

submit case briefs and rebuttal briefs. As 

a result of these extensions and to allow 

the Department additional time to 

analyze issues raised in the case briefs 

and rebuttal briefs, the Department has 

determined that it is not practicable to 

complete the administrative review 

within the current time limit. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 

section 351.213(h)(2) of the 

Department’s regulations allow the 

Department to extend the deadline for 

the final results of a review to a 

maximum of 180 days from the date on 

which the notice of the preliminary 

results was published. For the reasons 

noted above, the Department is 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

50940 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Notices 

extending the time limit for the 

completion of these final results by an 

additional 17 days, from the current 

deadline of September 2, 2008, until no 

later than September 19, 2008. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: August 25, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–20155 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

petitioner GEO Specialty Chemicals, 

Inc. (‘‘GEO’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 22337 (April 25, 2008). This 

administrative review covers the March 

1, 2007, through February 29, 2008 

period of review (‘‘POR’’). Due to the 

withdrawal of the request for the 

administrative review by GEO for 22 of 

the 24 companies for which it requested 

a review, we are now rescinding this 

review with respect to those 22 

companies. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 29, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Stephen Bailey, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Room 7866, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3362 or 

(202) 482–0193, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 29, 1995, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the PRC. See Antidumping Duty Order: 

Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China, 60 FR 16116 (March 29, 1995). 

On March 3, 2008, the Department 

published a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to 

Request an Administrative Review’’ of 

the antidumping duty order for the 

March 1, 2007, through February 29, 

2008 POR. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 73 

FR 11389 (March 3, 2008). On March 28, 

2008, petitioner requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of sales of merchandise by the 

following 24 companies: A.H.A. 

International Company, Ltd.; Amol 

Biotech Limited; Antai Bio–Tech Co. 

Limited; Baoding Mantong Fine 

Chemistry Co., Ltd.; Beijing Jian Li 

Pharmaceutical Company; Degussa 

Rexim (Nanning); Du–Hope 

International Group; Hua Yip Company 

Inc.; Hubei Guangji Pharmaceutical Co.; 

Huzhou New Century International 

Trade Co.; Jizhou City Huayang 

Chemical Company, Ltd.; Jiangxi Ansun 

Chemical Technology; Nantong 

Dongchang Chemical Industry Corp.; 

Nantong Weifu Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; 

Pudong Trans USA, Inc.; Qingdao 

Samin Chemical Company, Ltd.; Santec 

Chemicals Corporation; Schenker China 

Ltd.; Shanghai Freemen Lifescience Co., 

Ltd.; Sinosweet Co., Ltd.; Suzhou 

Everich Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; Taigene 

Global Enterprises Ltd.; Tianjin 

Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co.; and 

Wenda Co., Ltd. In response to this 

request, the Department published the 

initiation of the antidumping duty 

administrative review on glycine from 

the PRC on April 25, 2008. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 22337 (April 25, 2008). 

On July 21, 2008, petitioner timely 

withdrew its request for review for all 

companies except Baoding Mantong 

Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Baoding’’) 

and Nantong Dongchang Chemical 

Industry Corp. (‘‘Nantong’’). 

Partial Rescission of the Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR § 351.213(d)(1), 

the Secretary will rescind an 

administrative review under this 

section, in whole or in part, if a party 

that requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of notice of initiation of the 

requested review. The Secretary may 

extend this time limit if the Secretary 

decides that it is reasonable to do so. 

See 19 CFR § 351.213(d)(1). Petitioner 

withdrew its requests for review for all 

companies except Baoding and Nantong 

within the 90-day time limit. No other 

company had requested a review of 

these companies. Therefore, in response 

to the withdrawal of requests for 

administrative reviews by petitioner, the 

Department hereby rescinds the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the PRC for the period March 1, 2007, 

through February 29, 2008, for A.H.A. 

International Company, Ltd.; Amol 

Biotech Limited; Antai Bio–Tech Co. 

Limited; Beijing Jian Li Pharmaceutical 

Coompany; Degussa Rexim (Nanning); 

Du–Hope International Group; Hua Yip 

Company Inc.; Hubei Guangji 

Pharmaceutical Co.; Huzhou New 

Century International Trade Co.; Jizhou 

City Huayang Chemical Company, Ltd.; 

Jiangxi Ansun Chemical Technology; 

Nantong Weifu Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; 

Pudong Trans USA, Inc.; Qingdao 

Samin Chemical Company, Ltd.; Santec 

Chemicals Corporation; Schenker China 

Ltd.; Shanghai Freemen Lifescience Co., 

Ltd.; Sinosweet Co., Ltd.; Suzhou 

Everich Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; Taigene 

Global Enterprises Ltd.; Tianjin 

Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co.; and 

Wenda Co., Ltd. Because those 

companies for which we are rescinding 

this review do not have separate rates at 

this time (and thus remain part of the 

PRC–wide entity), the Department will 

issue assessment instructions upon the 

completion of this administrative 

review. 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR § 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR § 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: August 25, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–20166 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES