alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               34,958
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        57,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          31,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    134,090
<PP&E>                                            4,597,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,536,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      195960,
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,204,051
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                            159,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,167,811)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        195,960
<SALES>                                             365,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    366,338
<CGS>                                               295,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       295,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    216,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   27,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (172,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (172,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (172,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.11)


</TABLE>
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT



(EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN)





AGREEMENT, made this June 12, 1999, by and between Roger Henderson (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"), and Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation with its principal offices at 5 Hub Drive, Melville, New York 11747.



WHEREAS, the Trustee has agreed to provide his service to the Chyron Corp. Employee's Pension Plan, (the "Plan") provided that Chyron Corporation (the "Company") agrees to indemnify and hold it harmless for certain actions or inactions as Trustee; and



WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee for certain actions or inactions as Trustee.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



1.	To the maximum extent permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and by other applicable Federal or state law, the Trustee shall not be liable for (either jointly or severally), and the Company shall indemnify the Trustee against, and agree to hold the Trustee harmless from, any and all liabilities and claims (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against such liabilities and claims) against the Trustee arising from any action or inaction of the Trustee with respect to the Plan, unless such liability or expense results from grossly negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by the Trustee.  The foregoing indemnification also shall apply to all liabilities and claims against the Trustee arising from any breach of fiduciary responsibility by fiduciaries other than Trustee, unless the Trustee participates knowingly in such breach, or has actual knowledge of such breach and fails to take reasonable remedial action to remedy such breach.  The Trustee shall be entitled to collect on the Company's indemnity under this Agreement only from the Company and shall not be entitled to payment directly or indirectly from the Plan.



2.	The Trustee shall give the Company prompt written notice of any asserted or potential claim by any party with respect to which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.  The Company shall have the right to defend and control the nature of any action or defense to any such claim or demand which may be asserted against the Trustee for which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and executed this Agreement, effective June 12, 1999.



| |     | CHYRON CORPORATION          
| | --- | ----------------------------
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| | By: | /s/ Robert S. Matlin        
| |     | Name: Robert S. Matlin, Esq.
| |     | Title:   Secretary          
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| |     | /s/ Roger Henderson         
| |     | Name: Roger Henderson       
| |     |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            7259
<SECURITIES>                                    833073
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10604530
<ALLOWANCES>                                    128023
<INVENTORY>                                    3503943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15422802
<PP&E>                                         7228137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5126746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                17880043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6544870
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       1446742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     9790727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17880043
<SALES>                                       15307009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15307009
<CGS>                                         11254278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11254278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3710133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 21592
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (331475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (117586)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (213889)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (213889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Swordfish Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Nature Vision, Inc.Date: August 15,  2011
By: /s/ Michael AlexanderMichael AlexanderChief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)Date: August 15,  2011
By: /s/ Randy MoseleyRandy MoseleyChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swordfish Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Swordfish Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
" 

# ,.

In The Court of Appeals for the First District ofTexas

No. 01-94-00590-CR
Singleton, Timothy Dale, Appellant 

# v. Texas, The State of, Appellee
On Appeal from the 183rd District Court of HARRIS County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 646,193 

### ORDER No briefhas been filed. Accordingly, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 53(m) and 74 (1)(2), the trial court shall determine whether the appellant wishes to prosecute his appeal and, if he does, whether he has been deprived of a brief and a statement of facts because of indigency, ineffective assistance of counsel, or for any other reason.i For this purpose, the trial court shall conduct such hearings as may be necessary, make appropriate findings and recommendations, and prepare a record of the proceedings. If the appellant is indigent, thejudge shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation by counsel, which may include the appointment of counsel and ordering the preparation of a statement of facts. The record so made, including any findings and orders of the trial judge, shall be sent to this Court no later than 30 days from the date ofthis order. Ifappropriate, the record may include an affidavit rahter than a statement of facts. It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 90.

Order Entered: January 11, 1995 True Copy Attest: Margie Thompson, Clerk
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael G. Archbold, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of VS Holdings, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: September 30, 2009



|    |  |                                            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Archbold                    
|    |  | Michael G. Archbold                        
|    |  | Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                   PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                             QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                1997              1996
                                          ----------------  ----------------
                                                    FULLY             FULLY
                                          PRIMARY  DILUTED  PRIMARY  DILUTED
                                          -------  -------  -------  -------
                                                            
<S>                                       <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding during year.............   13,827   13,827   14,179   14,179
Excess of weighted average number of 
    shares issuable upon exercise of 
    employee stock options over 20% of 
    shares outstanding at end
    of quarter..........................    2,759    2,759    1,923    1,923
                                          -------  -------  -------  -------
Weighted average number of shares.......   16,586   16,586   16,102   16,102
                                          =======  =======  =======  =======
 
 
 
Proceeds available to repay debt:
    From exercise of options, including
     tax benefits, at average market 
     price..............................  $37,772           $29,562

    From exercise of options, including
     tax benefits, at quarter-end -
     market price.......................           $33,447           $30,508
                                          -------  -------  -------  -------
                                          $37,772  $33,447  $29,562  $30,508
                                          -------  -------  -------  -------

Interest saved, net of taxes............      409      362      302      312
Net income as reported..................    3,033    3,033    4,157    4,157
                                          -------  -------  -------  -------
Adjusted net income.....................  $ 3,442  $ 3,395  $ 4,459  $ 4,469
                                          =======  =======  =======  =======
Per share...............................     $.20     $.20     $.28     $.28
</TABLE>

                                       1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Robin Young
                                 ----------------------
                                 Robin Young
                                 Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2009

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Globalink, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Ben Choi
                                 ----------------------
                                 Ben Choi
                                 Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2009
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellate case name: Jordan D. Houghtaling V. Nichol A. Houghtaling

Appellate case number: 01-13-00547-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-38612

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 3, 2013 (Amended, March 24, 2014)

Party filing motions: Appellee

It is ordered that the appellee’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale_______________________

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale

Date: June 26, 2014
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Gang Ma, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gang MaChief Financial Officer Date: November 18, 2009
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000118

14-MAY-2019

09:31 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6449 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6449

  To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to enable a 
State to be reimbursed for child welfare training expenditures made by 
           a nonprofit educational institution in the State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2022

 Mr. Grothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to enable a 
State to be reimbursed for child welfare training expenditures made by 
           a nonprofit educational institution in the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Welfare Workforce Partnership 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CHILD WELFARE TRAINING EXPENDITURES MADE BY NONPROFIT 
              EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION DEEMED TO BE MADE BY STATE FOR 
              PURPOSES OF FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 474 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
674) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Child Welfare Training Expenditures Made by Nonprofit 
Educational Institution Deemed To Be Made by State.--For purposes of 
this section, an expenditure described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of 
subsection (a)(3) which is made by a public or private nonprofit 
educational institution and which would be an allowable expenditure if 
made by the State claiming reimbursement with respect to the 
expenditure, shall be considered to have been made by the State, except 
to the extent that Federal funds have been paid with respect to the 
expenditure.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to claims submitted on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50090

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUADALUPE RASCON-BOJORQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR:03-CR-648-1-AML

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe RasconBojorquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133592 & (46) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 133592 

 COA: 267117

 Wayne CC: 05-007434-01 
 LINDELL BROWN, a/k/a ANTHONY MARK, 

a/k/a ARTHUR RAGLANO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for admission pro hac vice of David Z. Chesnoff 

is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2007 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
#### TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION CO. v. WYATT LUMBER CO., Inc. In re WYATT LUMBER CO., Inc.

No. 7381.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 20, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 18, 1949.

J. S. Pickett, Many, for petitioner.

Watson & Williams, Natchitoches, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Writ refused. Under facts set forth, the provisions of Act No. 325 of 1948, and Article 2634 of the Revised Civil Code are applicable, and relator’s application for a suspensive appeal was properly refused.

On Rehearing

Relator has filed in this Court an application for a rehearing with respect to the action of the Court in refusing writs of mandamus ordering the granting of a sus-pensive appeal.

We know of no authority in law or under the rules of this Court authorizing a rehearing of the action of an appellate court in refusing writs in aid of its supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, consideration of the application for rehearing is declined on the ground that the action of this Court in refusing writs was final and there is now nothing further before us for action.
Exhibit 10.22  


Director compensation summary  


        Each director of our general partner who is not an employee of our general partner is reimbursed for any travel, lodging and other
out-of-pocket expenses related to meeting attendance or otherwise related to service on the board (including, without limitation, reimbursement for continuing education
expenses). Each non-employee director is currently paid an annual retainer fee of $45,000. In 2001, Messrs. Goyanes and Smith each received $10,000 for their service on a special
committee of the Board of Directors of our former general partner. Mr. Armstrong is otherwise compensated for his services as an employee and therefore receives no separate compensation for his
services as a director. Each committee chairman (other than the Audit Committee) receives $2,000 annually. The chairman of the Audit Committee receives $30,000 annually, and the other members of the
Audit Committee receive $15,000 annually. Mr. Petersen assigns any compensation he receives in his capacity as a director to EnCap Energy Capital Fund III, L.P. (EnCap III), which is controlled
by EnCap Investments L.P., of which Mr. Petersen is a Managing Director. Mr. Capobianco assigns any compensation he receives in his capacity as a director to Vulcan Capital. 



        Except
as described below, each non-employee director has received an LTIP award of 5000 units in the aggregate. These units vest annually in August in 25% increments,
subject to an automatic re-grant of the amount vested, such that the director will always have outstanding an award of 5000 units. For Mr. Peterson and Mr. Capobianco, a cash
equivalent payment will be made to EnCap III and Vulcan Capital, respectively, upon any vesting. The units vest in full upon the death or disability (as determined by the board) of the director. For
any "independent" directors (as defined in the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Plains All American GP LLC, as amended, and currently including Messrs. Goyanes,
Smith and Symonds), the units will also vest full if such director (i) retires (no longer with full-time employment and no longer serving as an officer or director of any public
company) or (ii) is removed from the Board or is not reelected to the Board, unless such removal or failure to reelect is for "good cause," as defined in the letter granting the phantom units.