alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6873

JIMMY G. GILCHRIST, SR., Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GEORGE T. HAGAN, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:06-cv-01236-MBS) Submitted: September 28, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007 Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy G. Gilchrist, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jimmy G. Gilchrist, Sr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gilchrist has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, as well as Gilchrist’s motion to expand the certificate, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
CA5£ h)o

. 0^-l5~- 00535'C.^

Oc+ob-er?, IZ, Zo/5"

Ifessc G A

V. "TV\t ^r^-Tc: Op 5 S
° =^s "fex.%S £ >53

« U3 -i-Tn

io CJ •X ro

lo k'3^ozvcvbl-e ^-ocaZVU Cot^ytA- oP AppeiaLS oF

IXYOI^^ T^5^-<- XTbA^eZ 

### "bix £. AppiS^ZZ-^i^-i- 44^Abt>iy-C 5^4Yf^<j AncJ ALxw^ l9-€rLe.cl

. Av»(4 0 4^'!3 AVvoTi Or\ fovC



## C-c? L\ vi ^ ^ 'J^i^ tip j lix j p-e U A-i-d fc>(lo



### I

. Tke^ F^<_4-LAuq-l b»^5t"i, ^-kt^ /(/i.o-Pun; 

## "Tbe_ -l-f2a^\ Cc3cAr^f Ap^^CK-V-l dci Arkkor^i^-^y iVlicV^t-l Ycu.Kj^ CAie/" Pukli

^ C-

^'i--rr 4 

## AppcilAv^4".
CAJ< U^\a3 +-0 'Ric.hAC^d IS

### Du.lf=vwvj ^ AjJiS^fexK-/- Publt'c

Offend ^ o^ 2-H--2.atS-, 

## R~.c,v«^i .""Y, CUitf PvitWc D-ffe^xJ^tt /Vi'ioW^-el 

### Aiad no-p C_rvv ^oUJccL A-Ue. 'Q^X-A/^ 

## Couv\.4v^ PcxIdIiC^ [^fcy>.<J'^'^ 5

. •^C_ -Poyl. fr Aj^P^(|o/CH bru* «p ^ a U.C. The 

### App^llo'^4' ViaJ ioo (J c-ia of 5m. ck



## €,(/'C(a,^5 t Kv^ |A» "V4<2. A ]^l o^ V«y2.q/. '?)
, Ol\^ A/x y

- 

### (\pp-e( 1A»-vT- cv^ iWcL^'^-e-^'(~ p-^rLjoiA Ai^d n^d fc)r2- V\t^ b^2.ce/^. 

## 'p.i cVv Arftd- B» DalA.v\y uj' Accfpl 

## A^pDxV^4^,^-|' 4-kr, CASe t 

## App€. I (yq .^-P UJOLA- [<4 'Q_<i-5j;ec4-/!A ( I iJ Acc<p" 

## VY\R. OuU»^ty ^ 1^ic.V\»vJ Ar5 l-e^cL

4-1^^ 

### VY\R. L)UU»^ty j f 4-U^ Co<Ayt4 .) UMOlA

_ 

## 1!>-€aa-c2^ CovA<^'P»j'• PcaWV'c^ Q^^r>J<frts d-^frcd \ o-A

. 

## App€-UiA^4- iUv^l- yTin,

. 0<;vl V\<^3 +'^<1' <vvxj 

## ^pC-^iKxee c/d/;^i iJA

2^ 1/

# App-e-tUvv-l- 4k^i4-^

I

y »-T -T^' 

### '\2.-£. »v\ ci "-Wo Cia5<. Alp-tial Co^i^-r T^ CdUi/I-L 4'^v»^poa.Ay2^AW Abhr"rc App-€A (

' ' '
, AV-c -W-tiiv] CO o^rL-h T^a. 

## Wli^ViAs/^, ic\.s^^ a13<^ 

# 'A-V-lb -W ^(i^^-l icv <i>cv^V rLcli^i- fv-i r^'^a AK J » 

# ^<^Sp^cJ'-k^ll (-|> 5ukv)-»<4"kJ^

^ OCC> At 

### C:i\fkas^^ UJ«;)(- Uh»4 ^Z66 Z.o'L 

### 'B^<.\/.\\<J

CERTHi^/IC/birg oP SERVICE 

# Appv^L-kAv^-l- ^€<2.-tiPv| -pk^-l- C^py'

0-P Akd. labo'^^ KlAi-lij/^ lot^^ Kvir^^'/leJ "b' 

## (\pp^LLe€ J A^icVit>\jc\5 A C^Tw^.'vv^l O/b-^Aick ^IAV\I

5"

### D) cJ- ^4- Hjr?- k\ S C-.'C
, ' ^ ^ ^ ' 

### /Uu-Cv/ja :^'7"/ Jcii^ '^/O
, flw'l-'^h.i ^ Tfel/iJ n^'ZjO'i ov^ jz^ 2,^ IS'.

<.' /J '< J e^y<. 6 m.2_)4 P ^ ^ ^ ^\qocOCNj"V««kj—-Jf:iued,^INTHECOUITTOFAfFEA.eATSANANTONIO.Ita;20ISOCT19KriT.'i't.KOTTLE.CLERH•1-^-(J3^£4-,o4I~o1SVQ,VG-<a:h/G.5^rr•sia)womwo3U)U)L'JA?-SAN2015OCT19FIL^DC^.ccuFTar'.-h•^AmNANTONlP.l!'.j-rZt^PH2!afJKtM'-ifOA•Hi1^^oG>35f^UiPJ5-on»c0^^r.3CI-^^^0v
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6**  **333**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ROBERT JOSHUA BUTLER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1 :0 3

- cr - 00 305

- WDQ

- 1 )

Submitted : April 1 8, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY , and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Robert Joshua Butler , Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale , Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Joshua Butler appeals t he district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Butler , No. 1:0 3

- cr 00305

- WDQ

- 1 (D. Md. Feb. 20, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6734 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize 

the volunteer services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the National Wildlife Refuge 

System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6734 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep America’s Ref3 uges Operational Act of 2022’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF5 UGE SYSTEM VOLUNTEER SERVICES, COMMU6 NITY PARTNERSHIP, AND REFUGE EDU7 CATION PROGRAMS. 

8 Section 7(g) of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 

9 (16 U.S.C. 742f) is amended by striking ‘‘2018 through 

10 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘2023 through 2027’’. 

11 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

12 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

13 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

14 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

15 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

16 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

17 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro18 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

19 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         607,543
<SECURITIES>                                   268,065
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,635,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                   774,688
<INVENTORY>                                  2,534,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,312,588
<PP&E>                                       8,400,225
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,123,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,253,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,356,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,452,492
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,404,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,253,930
<SALES>                                     30,043,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,043,169
<CGS>                                       19,949,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,949,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,216,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                37,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,932,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                   725,676
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,206,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,206,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (including the 
States of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, 
and the Territory of Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, February 28, 2008, 1 to 5 
p.m., Friday, February 29, 2008, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, March 
1, 2008, 8 a.m. to Noon Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(954) 423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, February 28, 2008, 1 to 5 p.m., Friday, February 29, 2008, 8 
a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, March 1, 2008, 8 a.m. to Noon Eastern 
Time, at the Holiday Inn--International Drive Resort, 6515 
International Drive, Orlando, Florida. You can submit written comments 
to the panel by faxing the comments to (954) 423-7975, or by mail to 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Room 340, 1000 South Pine Island Road, 
Plantation, FL 33324, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not required to be open to the 
public, but because we are always interested in community input we will 
accept public comments. Please contact Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 
or (954) 423-7979 for more information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 23, 2008.
Richard Morris,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E8-2014 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,102
<SECURITIES>                                       200
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,541
<INVENTORY>                                    168,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               381,208
<PP&E>                                       3,114,484
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,268,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,293,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,796
<BONDS>                                        672,067
<COMMON>                                        32,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     920,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,293,147
<SALES>                                      1,189,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,189,115
<CGS>                                        1,037,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,037,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6737 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6737

 To amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act to 
   extend the authorization of appropriations for the Lead Exposure 
                   Registry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2022

 Mr. Kildee (for himself, Mr. Moolenaar, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Upton, Mrs. 
 Lawrence, Mr. Meijer, Mr. Levin of Michigan, Mr. Bergman, Ms. Tlaib, 
Mr. Huizenga, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Walberg, Ms. Slotkin, and Mrs. McClain) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act to 
   extend the authorization of appropriations for the Lead Exposure 
                   Registry, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flint Registry Reauthorization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR LEAD EXPOSURE REGISTRY.

    Section 2203(d) of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the 
Nation Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-27(d)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B);
            (2) by striking ``There'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Fiscal years 2017 through 2021.--There''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Fiscal years 2023 through 2033.--There are authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out subsection (b) $5,000,000 for 
        each of fiscal years 2023 through 2033.''.
                                 <all>
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellant, 8 v. No. 30,425 9 ANNIE VARGAS, 10 Defendant-Appellee. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY 12 Grant L. Foutz, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellant 16 Steven F. Seeger 17 Gallup, NM 18 Advocate Law Center, P.A. 19 Bobbie P. Franklin 20 Gallup, NM 21 for Appellee 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 23 SUTIN, Judge. 242 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 1 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 2 and the time for doing so has expired. 3 REVERSED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

__________________________________ 6 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

_________________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 12
Exhibit 35Countrywide HOME LOANS 400 Countrywide Way February 28, 2007  Simi Valley, California 93065-6298 U.S. Bank National Association One Federal Street, 3rd FL Boston, MA 02210 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Servicing Agreement") that: (a) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, /s/: Joseph Candelario  February 28, 2007 Joseph Candelario First Vice President Compliance Officer Loan Administration See Deal Name listing on following page. Exhibit A  SASCO 2006-BC2  SASCO 2006-BC3  SASCO 2006-BC4  SASCO 2006-BC5  LXS 2006-2N  LXS 2006-4N  LXS 2006-ION  LXS 2006-12N  LXS 2006-16N  LXS 2006-18N  CSR 2006-AR1  HARBORVIEW 2006-1  HARBORVIEW 2006-4  GSR 2006-1 F (SUB)  GSR 2006-2F (SUB)  GSR 2006-3 F (SUB)  GSR 2006-5F (SUB)  GSR 2006-6F  GSR 2006-7F  GSR 2006-8F  GSR 2006-9F  SAIL 2006-3  HARBORVIEW 2006-CB1  PRIME 2006-CL I  SARM 2006-1  SARM 2006-10  SARM 2006-11  SARM 2006-2  SARM 2006-3  SARM 2006-4  SARM 2006-5  SARM 2006-7  SARM 2006-8  SARM 2006-9  SARM 2006-12  LXS 2006-3
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, AKA Clarence Gibson, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. WALKER, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-15362 D.C. No. 1:00-cv-05381-WMW
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William M. Wunderlich, Ma gistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted February 16, 2010 ** San Francisco, California Before: HUG, BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges. Prisoner Clarence Gipbsin appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of defendant Walker following a ju ry trial in Gipbsin’s action alleging 

# FILED
JUL 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSexcessive use of force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Gipbsin has waived the claims he rais es on appeal because he does not show that he raised them before the district court, nor does he support them with any analysis, legal argument, citation to author ity, or record eviden ce. To preserve an issue for appeal, the appellant must show that he raised that issue before the district court. Tennison v. Circus Circus Enters., Inc. , 244 F.3d 684, 689 (9th Cir. 2001). The appellant must also do more in his briefing than summarily assert that the district court erred. Sekiya v. Gates , 508 F.3d 1198, 1200 (9th Cir. 2007); Indep. Towers of Wash. v. State of Wash. , 350 F.3d 925, 929–30 (9th Cir. 2003). Here, Gipbsin makes no showing that he raised any of his appellate issues at trial. Nor does he make any assertions of district court error that are specific enough for us to review. The issues he raises on appeal are therefore waived. AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6774 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide coverage for boxing-based exercise classes for veterans 

diagnosed with certain movement disorders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York (for himself and Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide coverage for boxingbased exercise classes for veterans diagnosed with certain 

movement disorders, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boxing Therapy for 

5 Parkinson’s Access Act of 2022’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6774 IH

1 SEC. 2. BOXING-BASED EXERCISE CLASSES FOR TREAT2 MENT OF VETERANS DIAGNOSED WITH CER3 TAIN MOVEMENT DISORDERS. 

4 (a) COVERAGE.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 

5 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new section (and conforming the table of sec7 tions at the beginning of such chapter accordingly): 

8 ‘‘§ 1720K. Boxing-based exercise classes for treatment 

9 of certain movement disorders 

10 ‘‘(a) CLASSES.—In furnishing medical services under 

11 this chapter, the Secretary shall furnish boxing-based ex12 ercise classes to a veteran (through the provision of such 

13 classes to the veteran at a medical facility of the Depart14 ment or the reimbursement for such classes provided to 

15 the veteran at a non-Department facility) if the veteran— 

16 ‘‘(1) is enrolled in the health care system estab17 lished under section 1705(a) of this title; 

18 ‘‘(2) has been diagnosed with a covered move19 ment disorder; and 

20 ‘‘(3) elects to participate in such classes for the 

21 purpose of treating the covered movement disorder 

22 with which the veteran has been diagnosed. 

23 ‘‘(b) COVERED MOVEMENT DISORDER DEFINED.— 

24 In this section, the term ‘covered movement disorder’ 

25 means Parkinson’s disease or a similar movement dis26 order.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6774 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub2 section (a) shall apply with respect to medical services fur3 nished on or after the date that is 180 days after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS