alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6786 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to conduct an education campaign 

to inform the public about the resources available when their safety 

and security has been violated online, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. MULLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to conduct an 

education campaign to inform the public about the resources available when their safety and security has been 

violated online, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increasing Consumers’ 

5 Education on Law Enforcement Resources Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6786 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSUMER EDUCATION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT 

2 RESOURCES. 

3 (a) EDUCATION CAMPAIGN.—Not later than 1 year 

4 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Trade 

5 Commission, the Attorney General, and the head of any 

6 other appropriate Federal agency, shall develop an edu7 cational program and related resources to inform the pub8 lic about the resources the public has when their safety 

9 and security has been violated online. 

10 (b) CONSULTATION.—In developing and imple11 menting the consumer education program and related re12 sources under subsection (a), the Commission and Attor13 ney General shall consult with State attorneys general, 

14 State and local law enforcement entities, technologists, 

15 technology industry representatives, academic researchers, 

16 and consumer advocacy groups. 

17 (c) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The Commission and 

18 Attorney General shall ensure that such program and re19 lated resources are available to and readily accessible by 

20 the public on the website of the Commission. 

21 (d) EDUCATION CAMPAIGN.—Not later than 6 

22 months after the Commission and Attorney General have 

23 developed the educational program and related resources 

24 required by subsection (a), the Commission and Attorney 

25 General shall carry out an annual education campaign to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6786 IH

1 inform the public about the resources the public has when 

2 their safety and security has been violated online. 

3 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDS.—The Commission 

4 and Attorney General may use, or authorize for use, funds 

5 available to carry out this section to pay for the develop6 ment, production, and use of broadcast and print media 

7 advertising and internet-based outreach in carrying out 

8 campaigns under this section. In allocating such funds, 

9 consideration shall be given to advertising directed at non10 English speaking populations, including those who listen 

11 to, read, or watch nontraditional media. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus M. ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-3862.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 7, 2003.

*543Before: KEITH, COLE, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

The defendant is charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess over five kilograms of cocaine. He has appealed pro se from the district court’s order detaining him pending trial. This panel is in unanimous agreement that the decisional process would not be aided by oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34.

A defendant shall be detained pending trial if, after a hearing, the judicial officer finds that no condition or set of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance and the safety of the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). The factors that are relevant to determining whether to release a defendant pending trial include: 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of the person, and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). Subject to rebuttal by the defendant, there is a presumption in favor of pretrial detention if the judicial officer finds there is probable cause to believe that the person committed an offense for which a potential maximum term of ten years or more is prescribed by the Controlled Substances Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). A finding of fact in support of pretrial detention shall not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. *United States v. Hazime,*762 F.2d 34 (6th Cir.1985).

The defendant is charged under 21 U.S.C. § 841 and 846 with conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intention of distributing over five kilograms of cocaine. Because this offense carries a potential maximum sentence of over ten years, the presumption in favor of detention pending trial applies in this case. The district court so held and further concluded that the defendant’s evidence did not rebut that presumption. We have reviewed the briefs filed in this case and conclude that the district court did not err.

Upon review and consideration, the district court’s order detaining the defendant pending trial is AFFIRMED.
#### SENTELL v. TEXAS *&*P. RY. CO.

No. 4407.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 6, 1933.

See, also, 146 So. 353.

L. Percy Garrot, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Wise, Randolph, Rendall & Preyer, of Shreveport, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff owns and operates a plantation at Dixie, near Shreveport, La. The Texas & Pacific Railway Company runs a spur track from its line over the property of plaintiff to his plantation gin. On the 13th of November, 1932, on the day previous thereto, the railway company, at the request of plaintiff, had two cars spotted at the gin to be loaded with cotton. It was the custom between these parties that cars when loaded were hauled by the north-bound freight to a siding in Dixie, and thereafter hauled by the south-bound freight to Shreveport. This is almost always done upon request of petitioner before shipping instructions are given or bills of lading issued; these formalities being subsequently attended to with the agent at Shreveport. Sometimes, when found loaded on the spur track, cars are moved *to*Shreveport without request.

In the present case the cars were not fully loaded until about 5 p. m., at which time both cars were closed and sealed. At fifteen minutes past eleven, it was discovered that they both were on fire.

This action, based upon a contract of carriage, is brought by plaintiff to recover from the railway company the value of the cotton damaged and destroyed by the fire. There is no suggestion of fault on the part of the defendant.

In the lower court an exception of no cause of action was sustained and plaintiff’s suit dismissed, from which judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The cars were upon the property of plaintiff at his own gin. The railroad company had no prior notice as to when they would be loaded or when they should be moved. After the cars were loaded, no notice was given the company and, no request made that the cars be moved. The railroad company did not move the cars or have or exercise any control over them. No shipping instructions had been given nor bill of lading signed.

Though we have read plaintiff’s brief with care and examined all the cases cited, we find no argument that convinces us, and no case that holds that such circumstances constitute a delivery. Without delivery to the company, actual or constructive, or express or implied acceptance by it, there can be no liability.

We find the judgment of the lower court correct, and it is accordingly affirmed.
RESOLUTION

                1989 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

                    September 17, 1999


     RESOLVED, that Section 17 of the 1989 Stock Incentive
Plan and Section 19 of the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan shall
be amended to read as follows:

     PAYMENT OF EXCISE TAXES  If any payments or transfers
to or for the benefit of the Participant is deemed an
"excess parachute payment" as defined in Section 280G of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") subject to
the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the
Corporation shall pay to the Participant an additional
amount such that the total amount of all such payments and
benefits (including payments made pursuant to this Section)
to the Participant shall equal the total amount of all such
payments and benefits to which the Participant would have
been entitled (but for this Section) net of all applicable
federal, state and local taxes except the excise tax.  For
purposes of this Section, the Participant shall be deemed
to pay federal, state and local taxes at the highest
marginal rate of taxation for the applicable calendar year.
The amount of the payment to the Participant shall be
estimated by the firm of independent certified public
accountants serving as the outside auditor of the
Corporation, as of the date of the applicable event as
described in section 7(d)(i)-(iv).



                                                 Exhibit (10)(n)(vii)
Exhibit
32




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Green Irons Holdings Corp., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Sandy McDougall, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Green Irons Holdings Corp., and will be retained by Green Irons Holdings Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




July
      30, 2008/s/
      Sandy McDougallSandy
      McDougallChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Kabel Deutschland Vertrieb und Service GmbH & Co. KG for
the annual period ended March 31, 2008, I, Dr. Adrian v. Hammerstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/DR. ADRIAN V. HAMMERSTEINDr. Adrian v. HammersteinChief Executive Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date: July 29, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Kabel Deutschland GmbH and will be retained by Kabel Deutschland GmbH,
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 10.34
 SECURITY AGREEMENT
& DEPOSIT ACCOUNT CONTROL AGREEMENT
 First
National Bank of Omaha Red Trail Energy, LLC, Bremer Bank




---



##### 



DEPOSITARY
   - 2 -




---



##### 



SECURED PARTY: First National Bank of OmahaBy: 
Its
    
    /s/ Chris Reiner

Commercial Loan OfficerDEBTOR: Red Trail Energy, LLCBy: 
Its
    
    /s/ Mick J. Miller

CEOAndBy: 
Its
    
    /s/ Bonnie Eckelberg

CFO
 DEBTORs Address:
    
    Red Trail Energy, LLCP.O. Box 11Richardton, North Dakota 58652Attention: Ambrose Hoff
 DEPOSITARY BANK: Bremer BankBy:
    
    /s/ Brian HagenIts
    
    EVP
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT
   BREMER
    
    BANKBy:
Its
    
    /s/ Brian Hagen

EVPATTEST:By: /s/ Beth Odegaard

       Secretary
 - 3 -
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6679 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6679

  To establish a scholarship program for certain individuals who have 
   completed at least 2 years of service in the military, emergency 
     medical service, police force, or as a teacher's assistant or 
                  firefighter, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2022

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish a scholarship program for certain individuals who have 
   completed at least 2 years of service in the military, emergency 
     medical service, police force, or as a teacher's assistant or 
                  firefighter, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scholarship for Service: The 
Building Better Americans Act''.

SEC. 2. SCHOLARSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MILITARY, POLICE FORCE, OR AS A 
              FIREFIGHTER.

    Part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

             ``Subpart 11--Scholarship for Service Program

``SEC. 420S. SCHOLARSHIP FOR SERVICE IN THE MILITARY, EMERGENCY MEDICAL 
              SERVICE, POLICE FORCE, OR AS A TEACHER'S ASSISTANT OR 
              FIREFIGHTER.

    ``(a) Definition of Eligible Student.--In this subpart, the term 
`eligible student' means a student who prior to enrolling as an 
undergraduate in an institution of higher education--
            ``(1) served at least 2 years in the military, emergency 
        medical service, police force, or as a teacher's assistant or 
        firefighter; and
            ``(2) submits to the Secretary a certification of the 
        service described in paragraph (1).
    ``(b) Grants.--
            ``(1) In general.--At the election of the eligible student 
        under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall award a grant to such 
        eligible student in the amount equal to the cost of attendance 
        at the institution of higher education in which such eligible 
        student enrolls.
            ``(2) Option of eligible student.--An eligible student may 
        elect to receive a grant under paragraph (1) for any 2 academic 
        years in which such student is an undergraduate.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-18 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 724

For the relief of Wade Bomar, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1995

Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Wade Bomar, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF OF WADE BOMAR.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

6 $100,000 to Mr. Wade Bomar in full settlement of a claim

7 for injuries sustained by Mr. Bomar in the line of duty

8 on August 6, 1989, while fighting the Pryor Gap fire, per9 manently depriving him of the use of his limbs.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000077231
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA ENTERPRISES INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  264,636,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 17,404,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      61,283,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    38,633,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             381,956,000
<COMMON>                                    48,900,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   24,572,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         52,909,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             126,381,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          640,000
<PREFERRED>                                 15,864,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       125,000,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           1,245,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               17,337,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       80,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              95,409,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              381,956,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   76,889,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         4,156,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  64,146,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  68,302,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      8,587,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (3,000)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               8,584,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,724,000
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,860,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    321,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                5,539,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     2,925,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                    4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      19,993,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Gerald W. Evans, Jr., certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Hanesbrands Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.











/s/ Gerald W. Evans, Jr.Gerald W. Evans, Jr.Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 23, 2017
#### 916-922 Flatbush Avenue Corp., Appellant, *v.*Rica Realty Co. Inc., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 11, 1956.

*Samuel Weiss*and *Howard M. Weiss*for appellant.

*Irving Coopersmith*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The reasonable rent fixed by agreement pursuant to the provisions of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, § 4, as amd.) became the emergency rent and measured the liability of the tenant upon the expiration of the lease *(Manuel Realty Corp.*v. *Blank,*198 Misc. 393, affd. 198 Misc. 395, affd. 277 App. Div. 884; *R. B. R. Realty Co.*v. *Brzezinski,*84 N. Y. S. 2d 789).

The final order should be unanimously modified on the law by increasing the amount awarded to the landlord to $1,814, with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to the landlord.

Hart, Arkwright and Brown, JJ., concur.

Final order modified, etc.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

AMENDMENT 2014-1 
 TO THE

 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN OF 

DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION 

The Supplemental Retirement Income Plan of Devon Energy Corporation (the “Plan”) is amended, effective December 3, 2013,
as follows: 
 1. Section 4.2(a) of the Plan is amended to add the following sentences to the end of the Section to read as follows:

 Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant who is a “Transferring Employee” (as defined below) shall become fully vested in
any unvested Supplemental Benefit effective as of the “Transfer Date” (as defined below). For purposes of this Plan (i) a Transferring Employee shall mean a Participant whose employment with the Company or any subsidiary is
transferred to EnLink Midstream Operating, LP as of the Transfer Date, and (ii) the Transfer Date shall mean March 7, 2014, or such later date as of the occurrence of the “Closing” of the “Mergers” as defined under the
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Devon Energy Corporation, Devon Gas Services, L.P., Acacia Natural Gas Corp I, Inc., Crosstex Energy, Inc., New Public Rangers, L.L.C., Boomer Merger Sub, Inc. and Rangers Merger Sub, Inc., dated
October 21, 2013. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Devon Energy Corporation (acting through its authorized delegate) has caused this Amendment
2014-1 to the Plan to be executed this 7th day of March 2014. 
  

			
	DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frank W. Rudolph

	Name:	 	Frank W. Rudolph
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Human Resources