alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PEET-MILANO ICE CO., Inc., v. PISCIOTTA.

No. 16339.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 1, 1936.

Quintero & Ritter, of New Orleans, for appellant.

George M. Brooks, of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit for $113.85 made up of a promissory note for $100, loan of money of $12 and an open account of $1.85. The defense is a plea of payment.

There was judgment below in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s demand.

The effect of a plea of payment is an admission of the debt. Louisiana Tire Co. v. Todd, 8 La.App. 676, 677. The manner in which the payment is claimed to have been effected was by the delivery of a quantity of ice at the rate of 15 cents per 100 pounds. The plaintiff admits that all of the ice said to have been delivered by the defendant was received by it and that it amounted to a sum in excess of the amount sued for. It is claimed, however, that the agreement to accept ice in payment referred to a debt due by Charles Pisciotta, the son of the defendant, Louis Pisciotta, and not to the debt due by defendant, Louis Pisciotta.

The evidence on this question of fact is, as might be expected, conflicting, plaintiff’s bookkeeper supporting the áf-firmative and' defendant and, his son the negative. It is purely a question of fact depending entirely upon the credibility of witnesses. We see no manifest error in the conclusion of the trial court, consequently, for the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6734 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 365
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6734

                          [Report No. 117-469]

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize the volunteer 
 services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the 
        National Wildlife Refuge System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2022

  Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Graves of 
 Louisiana, Mr. Thompson of California, and Mr. Sablan) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

                           September 19, 2022

  Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the 
 Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to 
                               be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize the volunteer 
 services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the 
        National Wildlife Refuge System, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep America's Refuges Operational 
Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM VOLUNTEER 
              SERVICES, COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP, AND REFUGE EDUCATION 
              PROGRAMS.

    Section 7(g) of the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742f) 
is amended by striking ``2018 through 2022'' and inserting ``2022 
through 2026''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 365

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6734

                          [Report No. 117-469]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 to reauthorize the volunteer 
 services, community partnership, and refuge education programs of the 
        National Wildlife Refuge System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 19, 2022

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QS5 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  National City Mortgage
Co., Provident Funding Associates, LP and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7692

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Petitioner

- Appellee ,

v.
DERYKE MATTHEW PFEIFER , Respondent

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 5:21

- hc

- 02133

- BR )

Submitted : February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Deryke Matthew Pfeifer, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, Nor th Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7692 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Deryke Matthew Pfeifer seeks to appea l the district court’s order refusing to entertain his pro se filings on the ground that Pfeifer is represented by counsel . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The o rder Pfeifer seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7692 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.**

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

 

| **Subsidiary**                         | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Buckeye  GP LLC                        |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Partners, L.P.                |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Pipe Line Company, L.P.       |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Pipe Line Holdings, L.P.      |       | Delaware                                   |
| Everglades  Pipe Line Company, L.P.    |       | Delaware                                   |
| Laurel  Pipe Line Company, L.P.        |       | Delaware                                   |
| Wood  River Pipe Lines LLC             |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Pipe Line Transportation LLC  |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  NGL Pipe Lines LLC            |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Energy Holdings LLC           |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Energy Services LLC           |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Gas Storage LLC               |       | Delaware                                   |
| Lodi  Gas Storage, L.L.C.              |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Terminals, LLC                |       | Delaware                                   |
| NORCO  Pipe Line Company, LLC          |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Gulf Coast Holdings I, LLC    |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Gulf Coast Holdings II, LLC   |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Gulf Coast Pipe Lines, L.P.   |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Products Pipe Line, L.P.      |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Texas Pipe Line Company, L.P. |       | Delaware                                   |
| Gulf  Coast Pipe Line, L.P.            |       | Delaware                                   |
| Gulf  Coast/Products GP Holding LLC    |       | Delaware                                   |
| Gulf  Coast/Products Holding L.P.      |       | Delaware                                   |
| Buckeye  Albany Terminal LLC           |       | Delaware                                   |
| Ferrysburg  Terminal LLC               |       | Delaware                                   |
| MainLine  GP, Inc                      |       | Delaware                                   |
| MainLine  L.P.                         |       | Delaware                                   |
| WesPac  Pipelines—San Diego LLC   |       | Nevada                                     |
| WesPac  Pipelines—Reno LLC        |       | Delaware                                   |
| WesPac  Pipelines—Memphis LLC     |       | Nevada                                     |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-159159 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 23, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Transdel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiary (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transdel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.






/s/ KMJ Corbin & Company LLPCosta Mesa, CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2012
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Swordfish Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Nature Vision, Inc.Date: November 29, 2010
By: /s/ Michael AlexanderMichael AlexanderChief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)Date: November 29, 2010
By: /s/ Randy MoseleyRandy MoseleyChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swordfish Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Swordfish Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2410

___________

Darrell Hall, *

Plaintiff - Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

 v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

John J. Callahan, Acting *

Commissioner Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED]

Administration, *

Defendant - Appellee.

*

* District Court for the 

*

*

___________

Submitted: December 9, 1997

Filed: December 19, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Hall seeks review of the district court's grant of defendant 1

John J. Callahan's motion for summary judgment in this social security

benefits action. Because we agree that the ALJ's factual findings

regarding Hall's disability status under the Social Security Act are

supported by substantial evidence on the record as
-2-

a whole, see 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1994); Hall v. Chater, 109 F.3d 1255 (8th

Cir. 1997), we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 3(a)

 

NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY

ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF MEETING

 

The Board of Directors of the Company has taken the following action by unanimous Written Consent:

	

RESOLVED That effective October 1, 2001, the proposed amendments to the By-Laws of the Company attached hereto as Exhibit A be, and they hereby are, approved.

 

 

 

Dated as of:      October 1, 2001
Exhibit 32(a)



PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the combined Quarterly Report of Peoples Energy Corporation (the "Company"), The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company ("Peoples Gas") and North Shore Gas Company ("North Shore Gas") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Patrick, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas.



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | August 13, 2003
|--------------------- |  |  | ---------------
|                      |  |  | Date           

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board, 
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Energy Corporation



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | August 13, 2003
|--------------------- |  |  | ---------------
|                      |  |  | Date           

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | August 13, 2003
|--------------------- |  |  | ---------------
|                      |  |  | Date           

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
North Shore Gas Company
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Evergreen Fire Alarms, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. Wl5QKN-14-P-0069 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59880 

S. Christopher Easley, Esq. 

General Counsel 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Cameron Edlefsen, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 2 June 2015 // 

/:~:;/ . ff 

,/ ////:_ . 

;/ // . 

MARK N. STEMPLE 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59880, Appeal of Evergreen Fire 

Alarms, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Agreement between US Airways and its Executive Vice President-Operations



 Exhibit 10.37 
  
 October 20, 2004 
  
 Mr. Alan W. Crellin 
 21926 Castlehill Court 
 Ashburn, VA 20147 
  
 Dear Al: 
  
 As you know, US
Airways, Inc. (“the Company”) is in the process of implementing its Transformation Plan, which will enable it to compete effectively against the competition, including the increasing number of Low-Cost Carriers (“LCCs”). A major
portion of the Transformation Plan involves reductions in the Company’s employee costs, which means changes in the compensation benefits of all employees, including officers. Specifically, pursuant to the management cost reductions announced on
October 4, 2004: 
  

	 	1.	 	effective October 11, 2004, your salary will be reduced by 10%; 

  

	 	2.	 	effective October 11, 2004, the amount contributed to your retirement plan will be reduced by 25%; 

  

	 	3.	 	effective January 1, 2005, the current system for sick and vacation days will be replaced by a Paid Time Off (PTO) system, under which you will be entitled to twenty-five (25) PTO
days and eight (8) holidays; 

  

	 	4.	 	under the new PTO system, the eight holidays will be New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and two floating holidays; and


  

	 	5.	 	Section 6 of the Agreement will be applied according to your salary of record prior to reduction. 

  
 By your signature below, you agree that (a) the changes identified in items 1-5 above will not, either separately or in the
aggregate, constitute “Good Reason,” as that term is defined in the Severance Agreement entered into as of June 26, 2002 between you and the Company, and as subsequently amended as of March 31, 2003 (“the Agreement”); (b) the
changes identified in items 1-5 do not constitute a breach of the Agreement; and (c) as of the date of this letter, “Good Reason” does not presently exist with respect to you due to the changes identified in items 1-4 above. 







 Mr. Alan W. Crellin 
 Page 2

 October 20, 2004 
  
 This letter will be deemed to constitute a written amendment to your Agreement. 
  
 Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing and dating this letter in the spaces provided below and
returning it to me. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 Elizabeth K. Lanier



  

	
	 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS

	              DATE OF OCTOBER, 2004

	
	  


	              Alan W. Crellin
Exhibit 10.7  SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE STANLEY, INC. 2006 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN  May 8 2008  Pursuant to the powers reserved by the Board of Directors of Stanley, Inc.
(the Company) pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Stanley, Inc.
2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, (the Plan), the Plan is hereby
amended as follows, effective as of the date hereof:  Revised definition of Fair Market Value:  The definition of fair market value, as set
forth in Section 2 of the Plan, is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following new definition:  Fair Market
Value means:  (a) with respect to
any property other than Shares, the fair market value of such property
determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time
by the Committee; and (b) with respect to the Shares, as of any date, (i) the
closing market price of the Shares (A) as reported by the NYSE for such
date, or (B) if the Shares are listed on any other national stock
exchange, as reported on the stock exchange composite tape for securities
traded on such stock exchange for such date, or with respect to each of clauses
(A) and (B), if there were no sales on such date, on the closest preceding
date on which there were sales of Shares, or (ii) in the event there shall
be no public market for the Shares on such date, the fair market value of the
Shares as determined in good faith by the Committee..  Amendment to Section 3(c):  Section 3(c) of the Plan is amended
to add the following new sentence at the end of such Section:  All authority
delegated to the Committee pursuant to this Plan may be exercised, in its sole
discretion, by the Board..  Revised Section 6(d)(ii):  Section 6(d)(ii) of the Plan is
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new section:  Transfer Restrictions.  Restricted Shares and RSUs may not be sold,
assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered except as provided in
the Plan or as may be


provided in the applicable Award Agreement;
provided, however, that the Committee may in its discretion determine that
Restricted Shares and RSUs may be transferred by the Participant.  Certificates issued in respect of Restricted
Shares may be registered in the name of the Participant and deposited by such
Participant, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, with the Company or
such other custodian as may be designated by the Committee or the Company, and
shall be held by the Company or other custodian, as applicable, until such time
as the restrictions applicable to such Restricted Shares lapse.  In the alternative, in the sole discretion of
the Committee or the Company, record of the Restricted Shares may be made in
book entry form, with no certificates issued. 
Upon the lapse of the restrictions applicable to such Restricted Shares,
the Company or other custodian, as applicable, shall deliver such certificates
to the Participant or the Participants legal representative, or shall cause
any restrictions noted on the book entry for the Restricted Shares to be
eliminated..  Except as specifically set forth above, all
other provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.