alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Olga Griffith, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Brathwaite, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County,

November 29, 1956.

*Hayt & Hayt*for claimant.

*Ruth Gottdiener*for administratrix.

Christopher C. McGrath, S.

The claimant is a physician on the staff of a New York City municipal hospital. He has filed a claim for services rendered to the decedent after the said decedent became an emergency patient at the hospital as the result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident.

The notice of claim served upon the administratrix on behalf of the physician-claimant specifies that he relies on the provisions of subdivision c of section 585 of the New York City Charter (as amd. by Local Laws, 1943, No. 49 of City of New York) as supporting his right to charge a fair and reasonable snm for the professional services rendered to the decedent. The pertinent portion of this section provides that: “ Members of the medical staff who are serving on the in-service of a hospital as part-time clinicians shall serve without compensation for any service in the wards of the hospital, except that they may accept medical fees for services rendered by them to patients * * * who recover damages from cases in tort ”.

Although the claimant does not have a “ doctor’s lien ” on the proceeds of the settlement of the tort action as is granted hospitals under subdivision 1 of section 189 of the Lien Law, *734he does have the right in this accounting proceeding to a determination by this court of his claim as an ordinary creditor of the decedent *(Reardon*v. *Spagna,*205 Misc. 196, revd. on other grounds, 284 App. Div. 975; *Viviani*v. *Howard Johnson’s,*130 N. Y. S. 2d 331; *Woodley*v. *National Transp. Co.,*208 Misc. 732).

This matter is placed on the calendar of this court for December 10, 1956 at 10:00 a.m. to afford the claimant an opportunity to prove his claim.

Serve and file notice of hearing with proof of service thereof on or before December 5, 1956.

Settle order and proceed accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Eckert, Chief Executive Officer of CRC Health Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 17, 2011



/s/    R. ANDREW
ECKERTR. Andrew Eckert Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CRC
Health Corporation and will be retained by CRC Health Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1







                   Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrie Stores Liquidating Trust
(the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Stephanie R. Joseph, as Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, and H. Bartlett
Brown, as Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her or his knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.



/s/ Stephanie R. Joseph
---------------------------
Stephanie R. Joseph
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2003

/s/ H. Bartlett Brown
---------------------------
H. Bartlett Brown
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Trust for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.9


 


NASH-FINCH COMPANY

1995 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

(As Amended February 22, 2000 and February 19,
2002)


 


First Declaration of Amendment


 


Pursuant to the retained power of amendment and
termination contained in Section 9 of the instrument entitled “Nash Finch
Company 1995 Director Stock Option Plan (As Amended February 22, 2000 and February 19,
2002)” (the “Plan”), the undersigned hereby terminates
such Plan effective December 27, 2004. 
Such termination shall have the effects described in Sections 9 and 10
of the Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized
officers this 27th day of December, 2004.


 


	
   

  	
  NASH FINCH COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Attest:

  	
    /s/ John
  A. Haveman

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Kathleen
  E.McDermott

  
	
   

  	
  Assistant Secretary

  	
   

  	
  Senior Vice President

  
						



 


1
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6711 

To prohibition Federal spending on funding research in China, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2022 

Ms. HERRELL (for herself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. HERN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. 

AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. NORMAN, 

Mr. POSEY, Mr. HUDSON, and Mrs. CAMMACK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To prohibition Federal spending on funding research in 

China, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Funding Our Ad5 versaries Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING RESEARCH IN CHINA. 

7 The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans 

8 Affairs, the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6711 IH

1 Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the In2 terior, the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of 

3 Health and Human Services, or any other Federal agency 

4 may not directly or indirectly conduct or support, through 

5 grants, subgrants, contracts, cooperative agreements or 

6 other funding vehicles, research that will be conducted 

7 by— 

8 (1) the Government of the People’s Republic of 

9 China or any agent or instrumentality of the Gov10 ernment of the People’s Republic of China or any 

11 entity owned by or controlled by the People’s Repub12 lic of China; or 

13 (2) the Chinese Communist Party or any agent 

14 or instrumentality of Chinese Communist Party or 

15 any entity owned by or controlled by the Chinese 

16 Communist Party. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40323

Summary Calendar

 

ROBERT W. HURT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SPECIAL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-00-CV-372

--------------------

January 10, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert W. Hurt appeals the district court’s summary-judgment

dismissal of his lawsuit seeking disability and medical benefits

under an occupational-accident insurance policy his employer,

Winter Maintenance & Landscaping, Inc. (“Winter Maintenance”),

held with Special Insurance Services, Inc. (“SIS”). Although he

does not specifically challenge the district court’s reasons for

granting summary judgment dismissing his claims, he does so

indirectly by renewing his claim that SIS wrongfully denied him

benefits. The claims were properly dismissed for the reasons
No. 01-40323

-2-

explained by the district court, and its judgment is AFFIRMED. 

See Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir.

1994)(en banc); Newell v. Oxford Mgmt., Inc., 912 F.2d 793, 795

(5th Cir. 1990).

Hurt argues that the district court’s dismissal was

premature because he has new evidence in support of his claims. 

He refers to this new evidence in his brief, and he has filed a

motion to supplement the record with new evidence. The argument

will not be considered, and the motion to supplement is DENIED

because this court will not review evidence not first submitted

to the district court. Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson, 185 F.3d

477, 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1129

(2000).

Hurt also argues that the district court erred in failing to

grant him a continuance prior to dismissing his claims. He

contends that he was unable to prepare adequately to respond to

SIS’s summary-judgment motion due to his medical condition. The

argument fails because Hurt never requested that the district

court grant him a continuance to respond to SIS’s motion based on

his medical condition.

The majority of Hurt’s appellate brief is devoted to the

argument that he has been the victim of fraud, concealment,

negligence, and perjury by Winter Maintenance, SIS, and SIS’s

attorneys. He has filed a motion for expedited oral argument

renewing his claims of malfeasance, as well as a motion for

sanctions. Both motions are DENIED because Hurt’s claims are

irrelevant and conclusional. Hurt’s “expedited motion” seeking
No. 01-40323

-3-

to have this court order SIS to extend him medical coverage for

new operations is similarly DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,401-01

IN RE BRIAN DOUGLAS HILL, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1238827-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 208th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order that designates issues to be investigated

(see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has
2

not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the response include

an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with the habeas

application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such

response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: July 8, 2015

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Open Commission Meeting Scheduled for 
Friday, August 22, 2008, Cancelled

August 22, 2008.
    The Federal Communications Commission has cancelled the Open 
Meeting on the subject listed below, and previously scheduled for 
Friday, August 22, 2008, at 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. This 
item was previously listed in the Commission's Notice of August 15, 
2008, 73 FR 49200, August 20, 2008.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Item No.             Bureau                    Subject
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2..................  Wireline           Title: Implementation of the NET
                      Competition.       911 Improvement Act.
                                        Summary: The Commission will
                                         consider a Notice of Proposed
                                         Rulemaking regarding
                                         implementation of the New and
                                         Emerging Technologies 911
                                         Improvement Act of 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Audrey Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-
0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19981 Filed 8-26-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
March 27, 2014


  


		Re:	Member of the Board of Directors of Chimerix, Inc.



 


Dear Lisa:


 


It is my sincere pleasure, on behalf of
Chimerix, Inc. (“Chimerix”), to offer you a position as a member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Chimerix, contingent and effective upon your formal acceptance of this offer, which shall be evidenced by you signing below.


 


As compensation for your service as a member
of the Board, you will receive a $35,000 annual retainer. You will also be granted a nonqualified stock option to purchase 18,000
shares of common stock pursuant to our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), at an exercise price equal to the closing
price of Chimerix’s common stock on the date of grant, which would occur concurrently with your acceptance of this offer.
One-fourth of the shares subject to this option will vest on the one year anniversary of the date of grant and the balance of the
shares will vest in a series of 36 equal monthly installments thereafter, such that the option will be fully vested on the fourth
anniversary of the date of grant, subject to your continued service.


 


With your continued service on the Board
you will be compensated in accordance with the terms of the Chimerix, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy. Chimerix
will also reimburse you for reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in connection with your attendance at Board meetings.


 


If the terms of this letter are acceptable
to you and you agree to serve as a member of the Board, please sign and date this letter below and return it to us via PDF, retaining
a copy for your records.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ Kenneth I. Moch


 


Kenneth I. Moch


President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director


Chimerix, Inc.


 


Accepted and agreed:


 


	/s/ Lisa Ricciardi	 	 
	Lisa Ricciardi 	 	 


 


Date: 3/31/2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ESTATE OF WILLIAM P. O'BRIEN, 

DECEASED

PETITION OF: DONNA WELLINGTON

:

:

:

:

:

No. 112 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         256,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               812,000
<PP&E>                                       2,247,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,120,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          448,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       848,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     563,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,155,000
<SALES>                                        157,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               345,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (158,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (158,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (158,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2




ChyronHego Corporation


2014 Management Incentive Compensation Plan








Purpose of the Plan: The purpose of the 2014 Management Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is to incentivize the senior management of ChyronHego Corporation ("ChyronHego" or the "Company") to achieve the Company's earnings objectives for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014. The Plan is a component of the Company's overall compensation objectives and components, including base salary, long-term incentive equity awards and other fringe benefits, that are designed to attract and retain the best possible management talent; to motivate its managers to enhance the Company's growth and profitability and increase shareholder value; to recognize individual initiative, leadership, achievement and other contributions; and to reward superior performance and contributions to the achievement of the Company's objectives.





Participants: Participants in the Plan include the Company's executive officers, consisting of the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Interim Chief Financial Officer, the President of the Americas Business Unit and the Chief Technology Officer, as well as other senior management personnel of the Company.





Conditions: The Plan consists of a performance condition and a service condition. The target performance condition is based on budgeted earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT"), adjusted to a pre-bonus basis. The service condition is that in order to be eligible to receive a payout under the Plan, a Plan participant must be employed by the Company on the date of payout specified below (unless terms of any employment, severance or change in control agreements state otherwise).





Plan Incentive Targets: The incentive payout is based on achievement of a designated level of budgeted EBIT, adjusted to a pre-bonus basis, for fiscal 2014 (the "2014 EBIT"). Specifically, the Plan provides that 5% of the 2014 EBIT achieved by the Company will be paid to the participants in the Plan, which amount will be increased to 10% of the 2014 EBIT for every dollar of 2014 EBIT that exceeds the amount set forth in the Company's 2014 budget, with no maximum.





Form of Payout: Any award earned under the Plan will be paid in cash or shares of the Company's common stock, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors.





Target Payout: The target payout for fiscal 2014 is set as the ratio of the participants' base salaries compared to the total base salaries for all participants in the Plan, multiplied by the total payout amount.





Date of Payout: The date of payout to all eligible participants will be the date that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves the achievement levels of the Plan's financial performance conditions for fiscal 2014, which decision is expected to be made at the Compensation Committee's scheduled meeting in March 2015.