alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) of Powell Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas W. Powell, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |                                                                                       
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    June 11, 2004 | /s/   THOMAS W. POWELL         
Thomas W. Powell
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Mrs. Effie POE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. A. J. KRELLER, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 14838.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 11, 1934.

Buck, Walshe *&*Buck, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Scott E. Beer and Walter M. Barnett, Jr., both of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERPIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by a tenant against a landlord for damages for physical injuries alleged to have been caused by a defective step attached to the rear of *the*rented premises. The question of the responsibility of the landlord is not at issue, for it is conceded that, if the accident happened in the manner • stated in the petition, there is liability. The sole question, one of fact, is whether the plaintiff was injured as a result of a defective step.

The testimony on behalf of plaintiff consists of that given by herself and by a witness residing with her by the name of David Byrd. Both witnesses say that on the morning of May 20, 1933, about 6 o’clock a. m. plaintiff attempted to use the rear steps of the premises, and that as she put her foot on the top step it gave way, causing the steps to separate from the gallery to which they were attached and plaintiff to fall with her left leg between the steps and the gallery, her back striking the gallery.

*401Plaintiff was treated by Dr. Joseph Roy Theriot, Jr., for a sacroiliac strain, but no evidence of contusions or brush burns was found on her leg or body.

As against this testimony on plaintiff’s behalf three witnesses, the landlord, his carpenter, and a colored agent who resided in an apartment adjacent to plaintiff’s testified on behalf of defendant that the steps did not part from the gallery at all, but that there was a small recession of about two inches from the level of the gallery, which, if true, would make it impossible for plaintiff to have been injured in the manner claimed.

The trial court was of the opinion that plaintiff did not make out her case with legal certainty, and under the facts as we find them in the record we cannot say that it was manifestly mistaken.

Eor the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-043
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-20 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory committee meeting.

*Name:*                         National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), Executive Subcommittee Meeting.                     

*Time and Date:*                         September 17, 2008, 12:45 p.m.-3:30 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 505A, Washington, DC 20201.                     

*Status:*                         Open.                     

*Purpose:*                         The Executive Subcommittee will hold a strategic planning session, looking at roadmaps and plans for future activities including the 60th Anniversary of the NCHS.                     

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Substantive program information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of Committee members may be obtained from Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2402, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. Information also is available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web site:                         *http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/​,*                         where further information including an agenda will be posted when available.                     

Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) as soon as possible. 

Dated: August 25, 2008. 

James Scanlon, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science and Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. E8-20224 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4151-05-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 19, 2010

/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intcomex, Inc. and will be retained by Intcomex, Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6703 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6703

To require executive agencies to reinstate telework policies that were 
         in place on December 31, 2019, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2022

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Harris, Mr. Babin, Mr. Budd, Mr. Cloud, Mr. 
   Posey, Mr. Norman, Mr. Hice of Georgia, and Mr. Good of Virginia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require executive agencies to reinstate telework policies that were 
         in place on December 31, 2019, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Return to Work Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATE PRIOR REMOTE WORK POLICIES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the head of each executive agency shall 
reinstate the telework policies in use by such executive agency on 
December 31, 2019.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Beginning on the date on which the head 
of an executive agency reinstates the telework policies in use by such 
executive agency on December 31, 2019, the reinstated telework policy 
of such executive agency shall apply in place of any telework provision 
of a teleworking, collective bargaining, or other employment agreement 
of such executive agency to the extent that such telework provision 
conflicts with, or applies a different telework policy than, the 
reinstated telework policy of such executive agency.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given such term in section 105 of title 5, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Reinstated telework policy.--The term ``reinstated 
        telework policy'' means the telework policies in use by an 
        executive agency on December 31, 2019.
            (3) Telework.--The term ``telework'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 6501 of title 5, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-178075 and 333-49981 on Form S-8 of our report da ted June 20, 2014, re lating to the financial statements and supplemental schedule of the Cincinnati Financial Corporation Tax-Qualified Savings Plan, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of Cincinnati Financial Corporation Tax-Qualified Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2013.








/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Cincinnati, Ohio


June 20, 2014
#### B. F. (Lefty) Fowler v. State.

No. 24808.

June 7, 1950.

*Burks & McNeil,*by *Clifford W. Brown,*Lubbock, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the liquor laws in Lubbock County and fined the sum of $500.00, and he appeals.

It appears from the record that appellant entered no plea to the information and none was entered for him. A plea is a requisite for a proper trial. Art. 518, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.; Branch’s Criminal Law, p. 430, sec. 676; Thompson v. State, 46 Tex. Cr. R. 412, 80 S.W. 623. Such failure can be raised after the trial by a bill of exception. Webb v. State, 55 S.W. 493. We find this matter shown in Bills of Exception Nos. 2, 3 and 4.

We also think the trial court was in error in allowing the state’s attorney to correct the information and complaint in order that the proof and the allegation might correspond. The correctien by interlineation was a matter of substance and not of form and should not have been allowed.

We pretermit any discussion of the court’s charge, the case being reversed upon other grounds.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-21 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6711 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6711

 To prohibition Federal spending on funding research in China, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2022

   Ms. Herrell (for herself, Mr. Banks, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Hern, Mrs. 
 Miller of Illinois, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. 
  Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Cawthorn, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
  Posey, Mr. Hudson, and Mrs. Cammack) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibition Federal spending on funding research in China, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Funding Our Adversaries Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING RESEARCH IN CHINA.

    The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the 
Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Transportation, 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or any other Federal agency 
may not directly or indirectly conduct or support, through grants, 
subgrants, contracts, cooperative agreements or other funding vehicles, 
research that will be conducted by--
            (1) the Government of the People's Republic of China or any 
        agent or instrumentality of the Government of the People's 
        Republic of China or any entity owned by or controlled by the 
        People's Republic of China; or
            (2) the Chinese Communist Party or any agent or 
        instrumentality of Chinese Communist Party or any entity owned 
        by or controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6821 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6821

 To prohibit the importation of seafood and seafood products from the 
              Russian Federation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 2022

  Mr. Young introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the importation of seafood and seafood products from the 
              Russian Federation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States-Russian Federation 
Seafood Reciprocity Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) In 2014, the Russian Federation invaded and annexed the 
        Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine.
            (2) The United States and its allies imposed sanctions with 
        respect to the Russian Federation as a result of that hostile 
        and illegal action.
            (3) In retaliation, the Government of the Russian 
        Federation imposed an embargo on agricultural products, 
        including seafood, imported from the United States, the 
        European Union, Australia, Canada, and Norway.
            (4) Before imposing the embargo, the Russian Federation was 
        an important export market for United States seafood products.
            (5) Russian-origin seafood products continue to enter into 
        the United States market without restriction and imports of 
        such products increased roughly 173 percent in value between 
        2013, the year before the imposition of the embargo, and 2020.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF SEAFOOD AND SEAFOOD PRODUCTS FROM 
              THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

     The importation into the United States from the Russian Federation 
of any article classifiable under chapter 3 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is prohibited.

SEC. 4. TERMINATION.

    The prohibition under section 3 shall terminate on the date on 
which the President determines and certifies Congress that the 
Government of the Russian Federation has terminated its prohibition on 
the importation of seafood products from the United States.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 3 applies with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```