alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6628 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6628

     To provide appropriations for a border wall and provide for a 
      moratorium on certain other funding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2022

 Mr. Good of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Perry, 
 Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Babin, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Higgins of 
 Louisiana, Mr. Norman, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Massie, 
  Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Cawthorn, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Rosendale, and 
Mrs. Boebert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide appropriations for a border wall and provide for a 
      moratorium on certain other funding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Close Biden's Open Border Act''.

SEC. 2. BORDER WALL FUNDING.

    (a) In General.--There is appropriated, out of any amounts in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $15,000,000,000 for the Secretary 
of Homeland Security to construct a border wall along the southern 
border of the United States. To the extent available, such amounts 
shall be derived from the unobligated balance of amounts appropriated 
(as of the day before the date of the enactment of this Act) for the 
purpose described in subsection (b).
    (b) Moratorium.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
amounts may be authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
available, during the 2-year period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act, for United States contributions to the United 
Nations.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31

      Exhibit 31:  Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

Re:   Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-NC3 (the "Trust")

I, Steven Shapiro, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
 this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: HomEq Servicing
Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, NC Capital Corporation, and Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Steven Shapiro
By: Steven Shapiro
Title: Vice President
#### Michael O’Dwyer, Respondent, v. Castle Square Opera Company, Appellant.

—Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thisAmendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending May 5, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),

 

I, Jeffrey C. Rachor, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

 
| (i)    |   | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (ii)   |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:  November 2, 2007 | by: /s/ Jeffrey C. Rachor        |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                         | Jeffrey C. Rachor                     |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6665

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AUDLEY CASANOVA, a/k/a Robert King, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-108, CA-99-1100-1) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: December 27, 2001 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Audley Casanova, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Audley Casanova seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Casanova , Nos. CR-95-108; CA-99-1100-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 21, 2001, entered Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Paul NAGY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mrs. CLEMENZ, ISM; Sheila Mattingly, ISM; Terry Campbell, ISM; Stephen M. Dewalt, Warden, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 02-6988.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 18, 2002.

Decided Nov. 7, 2002.

Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named, Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Nagy v. Clemenz,*No. CA-01-7 (E.D.N.C. filed May 30, 2002; entered May 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the May 30,
1998, financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                            7610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     371943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                411568
<PP&E>                                          368107
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  795141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           172035
<BONDS>                                         392160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      159370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    795141
<SALES>                                         900190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                901970
<CGS>                                           666880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   666880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               20150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (32177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7947)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6554 

To prohibit certain Federal funding from being used for certain cash 

assistance programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2022 

Mr. STAUBER (for himself, Mr. HAGEDORN, Mrs. FISCHBACH, and Mr. 

EMMER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain Federal funding from being used for 

certain cash assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Disincentivizing 

5 Work Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds made available 

8 under any of the Acts specified in subsection (b) may be 

9 used for recurring cash assistance programs to individuals 

10 or households. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6554 IH

1 (b) ACTS SPECIFIED.—The Acts specified in this sub2 section are the following: 

3 (1) The Coronavirus Preparedness and Re4 sponse Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 

5 (Public Law 116–123). 

6 (2) The Families First Coronavirus Response 

7 Act (Public Law 116–127). 

8 (3) The CARES Act (Public Law 116–136). 

9 (4) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 

10 (Public Law 116–260). 

11 (5) The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 

12 (Public Law 117–2). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K/A of Webco Industries, Inc. (the "Company")for the year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P. Howard, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify as of the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:        1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.        This certification is deemed to accompany thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A, but is not deemed"filed" for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, or otherwise.

Dated: October 28, 2004 

/s/ Michael P. Howard Michael P. Howard Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0943-19

GERARDO ALONZO LOPEZ, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

ECTOR COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

DISSENTING OPINION

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion in Dulin v. State, ___ S.W.3d ___, 

Nos. PD-0856-19 & PD-1857-19, 2021 WL 1202400 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021), I 

respectfully dissent to the Court’s disposition of the State’s petition for discretionary 

review.

FILED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Pep Boys -Manny, Moe & Jack (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending August 1,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”),

 

I,Raymond L. Arthur, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(i)            The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:   September 9, 2009 | by:                                                             | /s/  Raymond L. Arthur |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                | Raymond  L. Arthur                                              |
|                                | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer           |
|                                | (Principal  Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11112

Summary Calendar

 

RALF MONDONEDO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

121 COMPRADES LTD., A Texas Limited Partnership, 

doing business as La Hacienda Ranch,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:00-CV-1867-Y)

February 24, 2003

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ralf Mondonedo appeals, pro se, the summary judgment awarded

121 Comprades Ltd. on his Title VII race discrimination,

retaliatory discharge, and hostile work environment claims.

Mondonedo was a bartender at La Hacienda Ranch from 17 August 1997

until 19 April 2000, when he was terminated.

A summary judgment is reviewed de novo. E.g., Tolson v.

Avondale Industries, Inc., 141 F.3d 604, 608 (5th Cir. 1998). The
2

judgment is proper if there are no material fact issues and the

movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. FED. R. CIV.

P. 56(c). No authority need be cited for the rule that the record

and all inferences drawn from it are viewed in the light most

favorable to the non-movant. Based upon our review of the record

and briefs, the summary judgment is affirmed essentially for the

reasons stated by the district court. 

Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying Mondonedo’s FED. R. CIV. P. 56(f) continuance motion. See,

eg., Liquid Drill, Inc. v. U.S. Turnkey Exploration, Inc., 48 F.3d

927, 930 (5th Cir. 1990). As a basis for the Rule 56(f) motion,

Mondonedo claims 121 Comprades submitted false and coerced

affidavits or otherwise acted in bad faith; this contention has no

merit.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029315
   <NAME>  Payco General American Credits Inc
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2006-QS5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
        Title: Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6674 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6674

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from requiring individuals to 
   submit biometric information or geolocation information to access 
                online services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2022

 Mr. Gooden of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from requiring individuals to 
   submit biometric information or geolocation information to access 
                online services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRED USE OR COLLECTION OF BIOMETRICS, 
              GEOLOCATION DATA FOR ACCESS TO ONLINE SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's 
delegate) may not establish or maintain any verification process for 
access to online accounts or services of the Internal Revenue Service 
which uses biometric information or geolocation information from mobile 
network operators.
    (b) Collection Prohibited Without Consent or Warrant.--The 
Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's delegate) may not 
collect, store, or share biometric information or geolocation 
information from mobile network operators without either express 
consent from the taxpayer to whom such information belongs or a court 
order.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Concho Resources Inc.
 (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 27, 2009
    /S/ Darin G. HoldernessDarin G. Holderness
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)