alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Don Norsworthy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PCA International, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifythat: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PCAInternational, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:    December 17, 2003
#### Lorenza EADY, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-7088.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 31, 2003.

ON MOTION

RADER, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Lorenza Eady moves for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing her appeal for failure file a brief, with brief attached. Eady states that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs consents.

Counsel for Eady states that, prior to the due date for Eady’s brief, he filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file the brief. Counsel for the Secretary was served and received a copy of Eady’s motion. The court, however, has no record of having received such a motion. Nonetheless, in light of the circumstances, the court grants Eady’s motion to reinstate her appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Eady’s motion for reconsideration is granted.

(2) The June 19, 2003 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.

(3) The Secretary’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-041
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6664 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6664

  To require certain meetings of the Tennessee Valley Authority to be 
      transparent and open to the public, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2022

   Mr. Burchett (for himself, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. Green of Tennessee) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require certain meetings of the Tennessee Valley Authority to be 
      transparent and open to the public, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tennessee Valley Authority 
Transparency Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY AND AVAILABILITY OF MEETINGS.

    Section 2(g)(2) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Meetings.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Board shall meet at least 4 
                times each year.
                    ``(B) Transparency.--The Board shall, with respect 
                to any meeting of the Board, a committee of the Board, 
                or a subcommittee of the Board for which a vote is not 
                scheduled--
                            ``(i) hold such meeting in public;
                            ``(ii) provide public notice of no fewer 
                        than 6 calendar days, through the website of 
                        the Board, of any such meeting; and
                            ``(iii) make publicly available the minutes 
                        and summaries of any such meeting.
                    ``(C) Emergency meetings.--Subparagraph (B)(ii) 
                shall not apply if the chairman of the Board designates 
                a meeting as an emergency special meeting.''.
                                 <all>
```
EFIH-2013.12.31-Exhibit 10(a)






Exhibit 10(a)


Manager Compensation Arrangements
Managers who are current or former officers of Energy Future Holdings Corp. or any of its subsidiaries or employed by the Sponsor Group do not receive any fees for their service as managers. Mr. Cremens receives $200,000 annually.
Description of BankBoston Supplemental Life Insurance Plan



  
 Exhibit 10(ee)

  
 Description 
 of 
 BankBoston Corporation 
 Supplemental Life Insurance Plan 
  
 Under an executive life insurance plan adopted by BankBoston’s lead bank in the 1980s, certain of its then senior executives were provided with post-retirement death
benefits of up to $1,000,000, increased for tax liability. In order to receive this full supplemental benefit, an executive must have 10 years of service and retire after age 62. The benefit is reduced by 10% if retirement occurs at age 61, and by
20% at age 60. Mr. Gifford is eligible to receive this benefit.
**Exhibit 21.0**

**Subsidiaries**

|                               | ** ** | **Percentage** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction or**             | ** ** |
|-------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                    | ** ** | **Ownership**  | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** | ** ** |
| **Registrant**                |       |           |       |                                 |       |
| Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.       |       |           |       |                                 |       |
|                          |       |           |       |                                 |       |
| **Subsidiaries**              |       |           |       |                                 |       |
| ** **                    |       |           |       |                                 |       |
| Fox Chase Bank                |       | 100            | %          | United States                        |       |
|                          |       |           |       |                                 |       |
| Fox Chase Financial, Inc. (1) |       | 100            | %          | Delaware                             |       |

 

----

(1)     Wholly owned subsidiary of Fox Chase Bank.

 

----
#### JEFFERSON ISLAND SALT CO. v. ROGERS et al.

No. 5001.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 1, 1935.

C. P. Thornhill, of Columbia, for appellant.

J. B. Thornhill, of Monroe, for appellees.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff avers that it sold and delivered to J. D. Rogers, a retail merchant in the town of Columbia, La., goods, wares and merchandise between September 1, 1933, and April 7, 1934, on the price of which there is due and unpaid $198; that suit was instituted on the account against Rogers and judgment rendered for said amount in the district court for Caldwell parish on September 14, 1934; that in the month of August, 1934, Rogers sold his entire stock of goods, wares and merchandise, store equipment and fixtures, to one G. L. Shipp, resident of Caldwell parish, the price thereof being unknown to petitioner ; that the transaction between Rogers and Shipp was a bulk sale, and out of the regular course of business, and was consummated in violation of Act No. 270 of 1926, Louisiana Legislature, in that said Shipp did not exact of the said Rogers “3⁄8 * 3⁄8 a sworn statement of the names and addresses of any or all of the creditors of the said J. D. Rogers, to whom he might be indebted, together with the amount of the indebtedness due and owing by the said J. D. Rogers to each of said creditors, as is required of the transferee, by the provisions of Section 2, Par. B of the said Act.”

It is further alleged that, if said sworn statement was exacted and furnished, as required by said act (section 2(b), which is denied, petitioner has had no notice of said sale as said statute requires. Plaintiff further alleged that the goods, etc., transferred in said sale had a value in excess of the amount due him by Rogers. The sale is attacked as being null and void as against petitioner, for'the reason that it was consummated in violation of the provisions of said act of the Legislature.

The prayer is for annulment of the sale and for judgment in solido against Rogers *330and Shipp for the balance due on the account.

Both defendants filed exceptions of no cause and no right of action. That filed by Rogers was overruled. The exception filed by Shipp was sustained and the suit dismissed as to him. Plaintiff appealed devolutively from this ruling of the court.

There is no signed judgment in the record. The minutes do not disclose that one was signed before this appeal was taken. As the court’s action in sustaining the exception and dismissing the suit, so far as defendant Shipp is concerned, is in its nature definitive, formal judgment evidencing that fact should have been signed before taking appeal. No appeal lies from an unsigned definitive judgment. Nicholls v. Maddox, 52 La. Ann. 496, 26 So. 994; River & Rails Terminals, Inc., v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co., 157 La. 1085, 103 So. 331; James v. St. Charles Hotel Co., 145 La. 1004, 1007, 83 So. 222.

We are impelled of our own motion to take notice of the lack of a signed judgment in the case 'and dismiss the appeal. Bacas v. Smith, 33 La. Ann. 139.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T MAR 26, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 4 3 8 7 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 8

- 8 0 0 9 6

- C R

- D T K H

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s
J O E L

. A D A M S , a

. k

. a

. P r e a c h e r ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( M a r c h 2 6 , 2 0 1 0 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , W I L S O N a n d P R Y O R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

R i c h a r d L

. R o s e n b a u m , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r J o e L

. A d a m s , h a s f

i l e d am o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

.

C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t

r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f

t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s

n o a r g u a b l y m e r i t o r i o u s i s s u e s , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d

A d a m s ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
The Honorable Robert R. Beezer, United States Circuit Judge

1

for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 96-3578

____________

Bruce Ring, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the 

Federal National Mortgage * Eastern District of Missouri 

Association, a Corporation; *

First Interstate Commercial * [UNPUBLISHED]

Mortgage Company, A *

Corporation; Prentis Hall *

Corporation Systems, *

 *

Appellees. *

____________

Submitted: June 12, 1997

 Filed: September 5, 1997

_____________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, BEEZER and WOLLMAN, 1

Circuit Judges.

____________

Beezer, Circuit Judge.

Bruce Ring appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of defendants Federal National Mortgage

Association (“FNMA”) and First Interstate Bank (“FIB”). Alleging

discrimination in lending, Ring sued FNMA and FIB under the Fair

Housing Act. Because the parties are familiar with the underlying

facts, we do not describe them except as necessary. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
Because we affirm on this ground, we need not consider whether

2

Ring’s suit was time-barred or whether Ring failed to show that he

was qualified for FNMA financing.

2

I

Ring challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment

to defendants. We may affirm summary judgment on any basis

supported by the record. United States v. Lohman, 74 F.3d 863, 866

(8th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 2549 (1996). We affirm the

district court’s grant of summary judgment because Ring failed to

submit an application for a loan.2

II

Ring also claims that the district court should have granted

him leave to amend his complaint. Given Ring’s numerous previous

amendments, the facial inadequacy of his proposed amendment and the

prejudice accrued to FNMA and FIB, the district court was within

its discretion to deny Ring leave to amend. See Pulla v. Amoco Oil

Co., 72 F.3d 648, 658 (8th Cir. 1995).

III

Because we affirm the grant of summary judgment, we do not

reverse the award of costs to FNMA. 

AFFIRMED

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EX-10.1






February 25, 2005




J.Aron & Company


85 Broad Street


New York, New York 10004


Tel: 212-902-1000



Belden & Blake Corporation


5200 Stoneham Road


North Canton, OH


44720




Re: ISDA Master Agreement



Ladies & Gentlemen:



This is with reference to the ISDA Master Agreement dated as of June 30, 2004 (the “ISDA
Agreement”) between Belden & Blake Corporation (as successor to Capital C Ohio) (“Belden & Blake”)
and J. Aron & Company (“J. Aron”). Part 1(h) of the Schedule to the ISDA Agreement requires Belden
& Blake to provide J. Aron by not later than March 1, 2005 with a Reserve Report for the year ended
2004 (the “December 2004 Report”). J. Aron hereby agrees that the due date under the ISDA
Agreement for the December 2004 shall be extended to March 31, 2005 and waives any default that may
otherwise arise under the ISDA Agreement as a direct consequence of failing to provide the December
2004 Report on any date before March 31, 2005.



Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the ISDA Master Agreement remain
in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
respective meanings assigned to them in the ISDA Agreement. This letter shall be governed by the
governing law applicable to the ISDA Agreement.




Very truly yours,



/s/ Steve Bunkin
Exhibit
      23.2– Consent of MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc.





November
      28, 2007





Gulf
      Western Petroleum Corporation


Board
      of
      Directors





RE:           Gulf
      Western Petroleum Corporation, SEC Form 10-KSB at August 31, 2007





Dear
      Sirs:





We
      refer
      to our report entitled “Securities and Exchange Commission Evaluation, Oil &
Natural Gas Reserves, Oakcrest Prospect, Wharton County, Texas, Effective
      September 1, 2007” (the “Report”); incorporated by reference in the referenced
      Form 10-KSB.





We
      hereby
      consent to the use of our name and references to excerpts from the Report in
      the
      referenced Form 10-KSB.





We
      have
      read the Form 10-KSB and have no reason to believe that there are any
      misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from
      the Report or that are within our knowledge as a result of the preparation
      of
      our Report.








Sincerely,/s/
                Leslie S. O’ConnorLeslie
                S. O’Connor, B.Sc., L.P.G.Vice
                President
**OFFICE OF**  **THE Al-I-ORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**

**E&-r. -**  **- AUSTIN** 

t0t087, 

### lfurlr a0mr, 

### 8r prooodurr nod 4lrporitl 8t 8 tU 8&18 h&8 .b88& ai+

OOV8F8d **jrrdg8Ot** 

### lillqU8llt

t8X88; uandrr tu 8818

8O!l Of th8 f8Ot th8t 10 

### th8 

### property fro6 Zr.
V8 

### faOt8 YOU har8 r8qU8St8d OUr Opst8t8 Of Ten8 h8S Ul iIlt43lu8t OOUr88 t0 mnU8.

in 8 tU 8818, 8lld thra plWVi(l88:

“To b8 ntd108d bl hiS (th8 ‘218X’k) 8Ubj8Ot to th0 Otdrr 

### Of th8 OOUXt for l 

### MtiOd Of tro y8an ml888 Oth8PwilO Ord8r84 **br** th8 OOUct, at 

### &oh t-0 

### th8 8oUrt 

### mar Or48r th8 IeM t0 bo 

### pdd to the 

## 8wo8r

l g8inrt rha Said 

### tu88 WOFI 8888888dt
. . ."

### Xn thooam o?Yoora1.Rogan 09 6.U, lO¶, a0 ,PlW8 

### ~OX't 10 418m88185 th8 qU"hOa Of U&O I8 8ditld t0 th8 810888MDOf fOr WhiOklUkd 801d an48? l 

### tar8018, Ii886 

### thlr18ll&U8@81



### -Xfthon U8.m 0x8088 

### in th8 bid over th8 

### Moaot Whi8h 

### tho.rhori?f oould lawfully 8ol

### 18Ot, itTm8 th8 pl'OO8848 Of th8 8818 Of ROgOl'8' i8Od ULd 88iOIM8d &I hirr 10 th8 hod8 Of th8 

### 8h8rhf. g 

### uOd8r th8 f8Ot8 r-8 $t8t8& th8 #495.5t d-8 not DolOn6 t0 th8 611at8 ai t8XB88n6 it k8 a0 lOt8l'88t 

### thorola.A8 t0 ThO i# Wltitl8d 

### t0 8Otd ROE8r i8 8 qUO8- tlO0 th4t EU8t DO dOt8rmilud by th8 mltri8t aOtU% Tour8 lOl-7 tmllr 

### ATTORHUT OuRuRAl.O? RxA5

ho. E. B8rmu biIi8knt OmlLE
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

AMENDMENT 2014-1 
 TO THE

 DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION 

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

The Devon Energy Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is amended, effective December 3,
2013, as follows: 
 1. Section 5.1 of the Plan is amended to add a new flush paragraph to the end of the Section to read as follows:

 Notwithstanding the forgoing, a Participant who is a “Transferring Employee” (as defined below) shall continue to be eligible to
receive a Supplemental Company Contribution for the quarter in which he becomes an employee of EnLink Midstream Operating, LP even though such Participant is not an Eligible Employee on the last day of such applicable calendar quarter of the Plan
Year. For purposes of this Plan (i) a Transferring Employee shall mean a Participant whose employment with the Company or any subsidiary is transferred to EnLink Midstream Operating, LP as of the Transfer Date, and (ii) the Transfer Date
shall mean March 7, 2014, or such later date as of the occurrence of the “Closing” of the “Mergers” as defined under the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Devon Energy Corporation, Devon Gas Services, L.P., Acacia
Natural Gas Corp I, Inc., Crosstex Energy, Inc., New Public Rangers, L.L.C., Boomer Merger Sub, Inc. and Rangers Merger Sub, Inc., dated October 21, 2013. 

2. Section 7.4 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentences to the end of the Section to read as follows: 

For the avoidance of doubt, a Participant who is a “Transferring Employee” (as defined in Section 5.1) shall become fully vested
in any unvested Supplemental Company Contributions and Credited Earnings thereon effective as of the “Transfer Date” (as defined in Section 5.1). 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Devon Energy Corporation (acting through its authorized delegate) has caused this Amendment 2014-1 to the Plan to be
executed this 7th day of March 2014. 
  

			
	DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frank W. Rudolph

	Name:	 	Frank W. Rudolph
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Human Resources