alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of First Westchester National Bank of New Rochelle, as Executor of Edith K. Cooley, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

November 2, 1955.

*Christopher J. M. Murphy*for petitioner.

*Charles E. Doyle, Jr.,*special guardian.

Samuel Faile, S.

In this accounting proceeding the executor has presented for determination certain questions relating to the settlement of the account.

The testatrix died a resident of the County of Westchester on January 23, 1954, and her will was admitted to probate by a decree of this court dated March • 31, 1954. The questions presented for determination relate to (1) the interest payable on general legacies; (2) the enforcement of collection of a promise sory note; (3) the delivery of certain jewelry specifically bequeathed to minors; and (4) the disposition of jewelry not specifically bequeathed.

Pursuant to section 146 of the Decedent Estate Law general legacies are payable upon the expiration of seven months from *637the issuance of letters. Interest is accordingly payable upon such legacies commencing from the date of expiration of the seven months ’ period. Interest on such legacies will be allowed at the average rate of return yielded by estate assets during the period of administration. *(Matter of Lathers,*137 Misc. 222.)

By the express provisions of the will the executor was authorized to retain any jewelry specifically bequeathed to a minor until such minor attained majority or, in the alternative, upon attainment of the age of 18 years, to deliver such jewelry to the mother or surviving parent of such minor with the approval of such mother or surviving parent. The testamentary directions clearly authorize the retention of such jewelry by the executor and avoid the necessity of the appointment of a general guardian or of any present delivery of such jewelry in satisfaction of such bequest.

The jewelry not specifically bequeathed is disposed of as a part of the residuary estate which is given in trust. By section 214 of the Surrogate’s Court Act an executor or administrator is empowered to sell personal property for the payment of debts or for distribution, A trustee is ordinarily under a duty to sell unproductive assets and to reinvest the proceeds in income-producing property. *(Matter of*Hubbell, 302 N. Y. 246.)

' The question as to the propriety of enforcing payment of the promissory note payable to decedent rests in the sound discretion of the executor. In the absence of unusual circumstances the court will not usurp the function of a fiduciary as to a matter involving only the exercise of business judgment. *(City Bank Farmers Trust Co.*v. *Smith,*263 N. Y. 292; *Matter of Lester,*155 Misc. 536.) No unusual circumstances have here been shown which would justify a departure from this rule. The court therefore refuses to furnish any advice or directions to the petitioner with respect to its duty to enforce collection of such note.

Settle decree.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19857]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on August 27, 2008 at 
10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    1. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to its 
rules regarding the circumstances under which a foreign private issuer 
is required to register a class of equity securities under Section 
12(g) of the Exchange Act.
    2. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to the 
forms and rules applicable to foreign private issuers that are intended 
to enhance the information that is available to investors.
    3. The Commission will consider whether to adopt revisions to the 
current exemptions for cross-border business combination transactions 
and rights offerings to expand and enhance the usefulness of the 
exemptions, and to adopt changes to the beneficial ownership reporting 
rules to permit certain foreign institutions to file reports on a 
shorter form. The Commission also will consider whether to publish 
interpretive guidance on issues related to cross-border transactions.
    4. The Commission will consider whether to propose a Roadmap for 
the potential use by U.S. issuers for purposes of their filings with 
the Commission of financial statements prepared in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (``IFRS'') as issued by the 
International Accounting Standards Board. As part of the Roadmap, the 
Commission will also consider whether to propose amendments to various 
rules and forms that would permit early use of IFRS by a limited number 
of U.S. issuers.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 22, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19857 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF J.C.
PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF OCTOBER 25, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-25-1997
<CASH>                                             208
<SECURITIES>                                       862
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                        81
<INVENTORY>                                      7,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,149
<PP&E>                                           8,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,169
<BONDS>                                          7,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        535
<COMMON>                                         2,727
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,207
<SALES>                                         20,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,795
<CGS>                                           14,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    598
<INCOME-TAX>                                       233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 647 

To prohibit a Federal firearms licensee from transferring a long gun to 

a person who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe 

does not reside in (or if the person is a corporation or other business 

entity, does not maintain a place of business in) the State in which 

the licensee’s place of business is located. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2021 

Mr. CROW (for himself, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

MCNERNEY, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. NEGUSE, Ms. DEGETTE, Mrs. 

NAPOLITANO, and Mr. KHANNA) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit a Federal firearms licensee from transferring 

a long gun to a person who the licensee knows or has 

reasonable cause to believe does not reside in (or if 

the person is a corporation or other business entity, 

does not maintain a place of business in) the State 

in which the licensee’s place of business is located. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Closing the Loophole 

5 on Interstate Firearm Sales Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 647 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO LONG GUNS OF BAN ON LICENSEE 

2 TRANSFER OF FIREARM TO OUT-OF-STATE 

3 PERSON. 

4 Section 922(b)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘(A)’’ and all that follows through 

6 ‘‘(B)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
AGEN-Exhibit 10.3.1 Q1 14




Addendum to the Lease Agreement from 01/28/2011 between
4-Antibody AG, Hochbergerstr. 60C, 4057 Basel 
(Sublessee)




and 


Technologie Park Basel AG, c/o Amt für Wirtschaft und Arbeit [Office for Economy and Labor], Utengasse 36, 4005 Basel 
(Principal Lessee)






The two parties named above declare that the following spaces are added to the leased spaces in Technologie Park Basel (Hochbergerstrasse 60C, 4057 Basel) as of 03/31/2012:


- Office: C3_26, 3rd Floor, approx. 12 m2,
- Office: C3_28, 3rd Floor, approx. 12 m2,
- Office: C3_30, 3rd Floor, approx. 24 m2, 
- Office: C4_20, 4th Floor, approx. 12 m2, rent costs:


	
			
	 
	per month
	per year

	Rent
	CHF 1,476.00
	CHF 17,712.00

	Incidental costs
	CHF 338.25
	CHF 4,059.00

	VAT (8%)
	CHF 145.15
	CHF 1,741.70

	Total
	CHF 1,959.40
	CHF 23,512.70












	
		
	4-Antibody AG


	Technologie Park Basel AG

	Basel, on [hw:] 09/24/2012


	Basel, on [hw:] 10/16/2012

	[signature]
Dr. Robert Burns
Chief Executive Officer


	[signature]
Hans Jürg Dolder
VR1

	[signature]
Melanie Schmid
Group Head of HR
	[signature]
Samuel Hess
VR2












[logo]        4-Antibody AG
4-Antibody    Hochbergerstrasse 60C





4057 Basel / Switzerland
**Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**Dated:     3/31/2007         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:By:/s/ Robert McGinnis     Title:PresidentGreenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc.I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.Robert McGinnisCountrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerThe Bank of New York, as CustodianU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10310

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY FORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-97-A-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Timothy Ford has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 11

SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share data)


	    QUARTER ENDED	
                                             	February 3,	 February 1
                                               	    1996		       1997	
NET EARNINGS
	Primary and fully diluted net earnings          	$ 3,786	  $ 5,478


WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
	Weighted average common shares outstanding	       23,357	   26,382
	Add:	Shares issuable from assumed exercise
		of options	                                         954	    1,355

	Primary weighted average shares outstanding	      24,311	   27,737
	Add: Additional shares issuable from
		assumed exercise of options due to the
		difference in the share repurchase 
		price under the fully diluted 
		computation	                                         64	      11
 
	Fully diluted weighted average shares	             24,375   27,748
		outstanding


NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

	Primary	                                          $   .16	 $   .20
	
	Fully Diluted	                                    $   .16	 $   .20
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6741 

To prohibit Federal funds from being used to operate or control an injection 

center in violation of section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act 

(21 U.S.C. 856; commonly referred to as the ‘‘Crack House Statute’’), 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on the Judiciary, and Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being used to operate or 

control an injection center in violation of section 416 

of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856; commonly referred to as the ‘‘Crack House Statute’’), and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crack is Whack Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6741 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR UNLAWFUL INJECTION 

2 CENTERS OR PURCHASE OF DRUG PARA3 PHERNALIA. 

4 No Federal funds may be— 

5 (1) used by any Federal agency to operate or 

6 control, or to pay the salaries of officers and employ7 ees of such an agency to operate or control, an injec8 tion center in violation of section 416 of the Con9 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856; commonly 

10 referred to as the ‘‘Crack House Statute’’); 

11 (2) made available to any State, local, Tribal, 

12 or private entity that operates or controls such an 

13 injection center; or 

14 (3) used by any Federal agency to purchase or 

15 provide any drug paraphernalia (as defined in sec16 tion 863 of title 18, United States Code), directly or 

17 indirectly through the award of grants or other as18 sistance. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### A. J. Taylor v. T. A. McCumber.

1. *Instructions—Where the Court Might Have Directed the Verdict that Was*Returned.—Where the court might have directed the verdict that was returned, errors of instructions will not reverse.

Replevin.—Appeal from the City Court of Canton; the Hon. P. W. Gallagher, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1902.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 1, 1902.

Grant & Grant and Fred H. Snyder, attorneys for appellant.

W. S. Jewell, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice

Wright delivered the opinion of the court.

. This was a suit in replevin for a cash register, instituted before a justice of the peace by appellant against appellee and Albert Harper. The cause was taken to the city court by appeal, and there dismissed as to the defendant Harper. There was a trial by jury resulting in a verdict for the *88defendant. The court overruled appellant’s motion for a new trial and gave judgment upon the verdict against appellant, which he seeks to reverse by appeal to this court. The errors argued in this court, by which the reversal of the judgment is sought, consist of wrong instructions to the jury.

There is no conflict of evidence except as to the price of the cash register and the payment thereof. Appellant testified that he first loaned the register, and then sold it, to McCumber, for $100, and that the latter had' paid no part of the purchase price. McCumber testified that he purchased the register of appellant for seventy-five dollars and paid him the cash for it at the time of the purchase. McCumber was corroborated by two other witnesses, who also testified to the sale by appellant of the register to appellee for seventy-five dollars and that the money was paid and accepted. There then was no dispute concerning the material facts in the issue. The dispute relative to the amount of the price and its payment was not material as affecting the ownership of the property or the right to its possession. The sale to McCumber was absolute, no reservation of any kind having been made, and the possession remained with him. However, if the amount of the price and its payment had been material the great weight of the evidence was with appellee, and a verdict against him upon such issue could not be sustained. The verdict was therefore right, Upon the evidence in the case. No other verdict could have been sustained. The court might well have directed the verdict that was returned, and where this is true it has often been held that errors of instructions will not reverse. The instructions in the case of which complaint has been made, can not be maintained. They were erroneous for many reasons, but for the reason we have already assigned they did appellant no harm, and it would be a task of supererogation for us to point out the many vices and infirmities contained in them.

Finding no reversible error the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn-Pacific  Corp., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,  Rose
Fischer,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Accounting  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: May 10, 2005



/s/ Rose Fischer
Rose Fischer
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

s hould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50249 A-98-CA-392-JN

AUSTIN TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION, CO., doing business as ATS Electrical Contracts; FRED SHIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. SVERDRUP FACILITIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

December 13, 1999 Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The court has carefully considered the appeal of Austin
Traffic Signal in light of the briefs, arguments of counsel and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no

r eversible error of fact or law in the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

Appellant’s claim for negligent misrepresentation fails
in light of Federal Land Bank Ass’n of Tyler v. Sloane , 825 S.W.2d2

439 (Tx. 1991). Because Sverdrup had free rein as a consultant to

AISD to recommend an electrical contractor, and because AISD could
accept the bid of whomever it chose or could have rejected any and
all bids, and because appellant was well aware of these facts, the appellant cou ld not justifiably rely upon representations or omissions concerning the status of the bidding process.

With regard to appellant’s claims for defamation and
tortious interference with contractual relations, the district court’s opinion is correct and dispositive of these issues.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 51006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,618]


Whirlpool Corporation, Fort Smith, AR; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on June 30, 2008 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Whirlpool Corporation, Fort Smith, Arkansas.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of August 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-20044 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P