alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SMITH v. LUCAS et al.

No. 14896.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 4, 1935.

*430Carl A. Conrad, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Porteous, Johnson & Humphrey and Julian B. Humphrey, all of New Orleans, for appel-lees.

LECHE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Eliza Moore Smith, filed this suit for damages against Marc Lucas, Jr., an<i Sam White for alleged injuries sustained by her on or about August 12, 1933, while occupying, as lessee, the premises, No. 1126 Teche street. Erom a judgment in favor of defendants, she has appealed.

 It appears that defendant Sam White owned a store building situated on the corner of Teche and De Armas streets in Algiers. The premises known as 1126 Teche were immediately in the rear of this store. On June 10, 1933, Marc Lucas, Jr., signed a written agreement to purchase the property and made a deposit of $200. He operated a small business in the store for several months and, by reason of a bank failure, was unable to carry out his agreement to purchase; forfeited his $200, and moved out. For the two months preceding his removal he paid rent to Sam White. The property known as 1126 Teche street consisted of a dilapidated shack or cabin which was practically falling to pieces by reason of age and decay. Plaintiff and her family were poverty-stricken colored people living from hand to mouth. They moved into this wreck of a dwelling without any authorization whatsoever and in the face of a warning as to its dangerous condition. Plaintiff, herself, accurately described its decrepitude which she fully realized before moving in. There was absolutely no relationship of landlord and tenant between defendants and plaintiff and, even if such relationship existed, plaintiff was guilty of such contributory negligence as would bar her recovery. In his reasons for judgment the learned trial judge said:

> “I believe the defendants in this case and I believe that the plaintiff and her husband were warned that these premises was simply an old wreck and dangerous to live in. But I don’t need their testimony. The woman, herself, testified that the house was a mere wreck and she went under it and saw all the sills wore rotten and she knew the place was dangerous and when they went into that place without the consent of the owner, and he, out of mere charity, allowed them to stay in that wreck of a house, they assumed all the risks and it was contributory negligence for- them to move in that house and live in it, in the condition it was in.”

The record fully bears him out and, consequently, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6641 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide for certain 

adjustments to Medicare payment for items of durable medical equipment 

that were formerly included in round 2021 of the DMEPOS competitive 

bidding program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2022 

Mr. MULLIN (for himself, Mr. TONKO, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. 

KELLER, Mr. REED, and Mr. MRVAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

provide for certain adjustments to Medicare payment 

for items of durable medical equipment that were formerly included in round 2021 of the DMEPOS competitive bidding program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DMEPOS Relief Act 

5 of 2022’’ or the ‘‘DRA of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6641 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENTS TO MEDICARE PAYMENT FOR ITEMS 

2 OF DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT FOR3 MERLY INCLUDED IN ROUND 2021 OF THE 

4 DMEPOS COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

6 Human Services shall implement section 414.210 of title 

7 42, Code of Federal Regulations, such that the fee sched8 ule amounts determined pursuant to such section for cov9 ered items furnished during the period beginning on Janu10 ary 1, 2022, and ending on December 31, 2023, shall be 

11 applied as if the transition rules under paragraph (g)(9) 

12 of such section provided that for such covered items so 

13 furnished, the fee schedule amount for the area involved 

14 is equal to 90 percent of the adjusted payment amount 

15 established under such section and 10 percent of the 

16 unadjusted fee schedule amount established under such 

17 section. 

18 (b) COVERED ITEM DEFINED.—For purposes of sub19 section (a), the term ‘‘covered item’’ means any item— 

20 (1) that were competed under the Round 2021 

21 DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program; 

22 (2) for which contracts were not executed for 

23 such round of bidding; and 

24 (3) which did not, as of January 1, 2021, revert 

25 to the unadjusted fee schedule amount established 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6641 IH

1 under section 414.210 of title 42, Code of Federal 

2 Regulations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### EMPLOYERS CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAKER-LAWHON & FORD, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 5742.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1939.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1939.

Writ of Certiorari and Review Denied May 1, 1939.

Sholars & Gunby and G. Allen Kimball, all of Monroe, for appellants.

Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh, of Monroe, for appellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion of the case of Austin v. Baker-Lawhon & Ford, Inc., et al., 188 So. 416, this day decided by us, the judgment appealed from in this cause is affirmed.
----

----

| Date: March 21, 2012 | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak                               |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Jerry Kieliszak                                   |
|                 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6725 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6725

To change the address of the Marilyn Monroe Post Office, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2022

 Mr. Cardenas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To change the address of the Marilyn Monroe Post Office, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE.

    Section 1 of Public Law 116-80 is amended to read as follows:

``SECTION 1. MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    ``(a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 15701 Sherman Way in Van Nuys, California, shall be 
known and designated as the `Marilyn Monroe Post Office Building'.
    ``(b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
`Marilyn Monroe Post Office Building'.''.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

804 

CA 11-02005 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

DONOVAN HUMPHREY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

EDWARD CAMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

AND BEN PENNETTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UTICA (MO ATHARI OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

SLIWA & LANE, BUFFALO (STANLEY J. SLIWA OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew

A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered May 31, 2011 in a personal injury action. 

The order, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Ben Pennetta to

videotape the deposition of plaintiff. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Active Care Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Carter, Gertrude E., Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Law Office of Daniel J. Tucker, for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Richard J. Montelione, J.), dated December 2, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's contentions on appeal, defendant established that the examination under oath (EUO) scheduling letters had been timely mailed (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]) and that plaintiff had failed to appear for the duly scheduled EUOs (<i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720 [2006]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 23, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-165897 and No. 333-162990, both on Form S-8, of our reports dated March 9, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Subsidiary, and theeffectiveness of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Subsidiary’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended December 25, 2010. 

*DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

March 9,2011
EXHIBIT 15













Pennsylvania Power Company
1 E. Washington Street
P. O. Box 891
New Castle, Pennsylvania 16103

Gentlemen:

We are aware that Pennsylvania Power Company has 
incorporated by reference in its previously filed 
Registration Statements No. 33-47372, No. 33-62450 and No. 
33-65156, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for 
the quarter ended September 30, 1997, which includes our 
report dated November 13, 1997, covering the unaudited 
interim financial statements contained therein. Pursuant to 
Rule 436(c) of Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, 
such report is not considered a part of the Registration 
Statements prepared or certified by our firm or a report 
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of 
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                  Very truly yours,




                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
November 13, 1997
Exhibit 10.15
 Summary of 2010 vRad Incentive Compensation Plan
  
    
    The plan provides opportunities to earn incentive compensation to vRads executive
officers, directors, and managers.
    
    The target bonus payment for each individual is tied to his or her position and
level, and may be subject to pro-ration based on the employees start date or in-year
promotion.
    
    Payment of bonus amounts is determined by the funding of a bonus pool, and the
individuals performance.
 
    
    Funding of the bonus pool is based on a scale tied to the
companys Adjusted EBITDA performance. In determining performance relative to
the scale, the Board of Directors may exclude extraordinary events affecting
financial results (such as acquisitions) or may adjust the scale as it deems
appropriate in its discretion.
    
    Individual performance is determined by the level achievement
of 3 or 4 personal performance objectives, as established by the employees
direct executive team leader, with the exception of the CEO. Incentive
compensation paid to the CEO is based on the companys Adjusted EBITDA
performance.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 12(a)
                           J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                          and Consolidated Subsidiaries

       Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Combined Fixed Charges
                    and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            52 weeks ended
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Apr. 26,            Apr. 27,
($ Millions)                                          1997                1996
                                                    --------            --------
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>    

Income from continuing operations                   $  857                $1,256
      (before income taxes, before      
      capitalized interest, but after   
      preferred stock dividend)         
                                        
Fixed charges                           
                                        
Interest (including capitalized         
interest) on:                           
                                        
      Operating leases                                 110                   102
      Short term debt                                  127                   120
      Long term debt                                   341                   268
      Capital leases                                     7                     5
      Credit facility                                   19                     -
      Other, net                                         2                     1
                                        
                                                    ------                ------
Total fixed charges                                    606                   496
                                        
Preferred stock dividend, before taxes                  46                    48
                                        
                                        
                                                    
Combined fixed charges and preferred                ------                ------ 
      stock dividend requirement                       652                   544
                                        
Total available income                              $1,509                $1,800
                                                    ======                ======
                                        
Ratio of available income to combined   
      fixed charges and preferred stock 
      dividend requirement                             2.3                   3.3
                                                    ======                ======
</TABLE>


The interest  cost of the LESOP notes  guaranteed by the Company is not included
in fixed charges above.

The Company  believes that, due to the seasonal  nature of its business,  ratios
for a period of time other than a 52 week period are inappropriate.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 2.5

                                  ASSIGNMENT

     This ASSIGNMENT is entered into as of January 27, 2000, by and among
SPARTAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC ("Spartan"), a Delaware limited liability
company, and Divot Golf Corporation ("Divot"), a Delaware corporation.

     WHEREAS, Spartan entered into a Sale and Assignment Agreement with Mark
Savoretti dated as of January 27, 2000 (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, simultaneously with the execution by Spartan of the Agreement, the
parties hereto desire that Spartan assign all of its rights and obligations
under the Agreement to Travel.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein:

     1.   In exchange for the payment by Divot of $10.00, Spartan hereby assigns
          all its rights and obligations under the Agreement to Divot.

     2.   This Assignment is effective as of the date hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement to be
effective as of the date set forth above.

                                             SPARTAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

                                             By: /s/ David A. Noosinow
                                                ----------------------------
                                             Name:   David A. Noosinow
                                                  --------------------------
                                             Title:  Executive Director
                                                   -------------------------

                                             DIVOT GOLF CORPORATION

                                             By: /s/ Joseph R. Cellura
                                                ----------------------------
                                             Name:   Joseph R. Cellura
                                                  --------------------------
                                             Title:  Chairman & CEO
                                                   -------------------------
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 662 

To require that in a notice of proposed rulemaking for a new rule, the 

notice shall identify three rules which the agency intends to repeal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2021 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require that in a notice of proposed rulemaking for a 

new rule, the notice shall identify three rules which the 

agency intends to repeal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Red-Tape 

5 Reduction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO REPEAL THREE RULES BEFORE 

7 MAKING A NEW RULE. 

8 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 662 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(4) in the case of a notice of proposed rule 

8 making for a new rule, except in the case of a new 

9 rule which is required by statute, an identification of 

10 three rules that the agency intends to repeal, includ11 ing the date on which the agency began the rule 

12 making process in order to repeal such rules.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



________________





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  March 12, 2009





CHYRON CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

|New York                                       | 1-9014                   | 11-2117385                          
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

|5 Hub Drive                              |           
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|Melville, New York                       | 11747     
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition

On March 12, 2009, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2008. A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three months and years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits

99.1 Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated March 12, 2009.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

CHYRON CORPORATION

| | By:    | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | Jerry Kieliszak          
| | Title: | Senior Vice President and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer  

|Exhibit No. | Description                         
|----------- | ------------------------------------
|            |                                     
|99.1        | Press Release, dated March 12, 2009.

Date: March 12, 2009
EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

Description of Director Compensation 

Effective April 1, 2014, non-employee directors of the Company receive $15,000 per fiscal quarter in compensation for service as director, plus $1,500
per board and committee meeting attended, except the Chairs of the Audit Committee and the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, who each receive $16,250 per fiscal quarter and $1,500 per board and committee meeting attended, and except
for the Independent Lead Director, who receives $17,500 per fiscal quarter and $1,500 per board and committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors may elect to defer the receipt of meeting and/or director fees in accordance with the terms
of the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. In addition, non-employee directors may from time to time be granted restricted stock units pursuant to the provisions of the Genuine Parts Company 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan. The
compensation of directors may be changed from time to time by the Board of Directors without stockholder approval.