alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.8


[ERNST & YOUNG LOGO]   Ernst & Young LLP                   Phone: (612) 343-1000
                       220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400   www.ey.com
                       Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i),
1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(i) through 1122 (d)(2)(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i)
through 1122 (d)(3)(iv), and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them
with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                        ----------------------------------------

February 26, 2007

                   A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
EX-35 (d)
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

JPL 2006-A2

I, Michael De Francesco, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable portion
thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.


Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Agreement.

Date: February 28, 2007


/s/ Michael De Francesco
Michael De Francesco
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6765 

To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 with 

respect to the application of the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule to certain farms, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. 

BOST, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. 

PALAZZO, Mr. STEWART, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. GOSAR, and 

Mr. NEWHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development 

Act of 2014 with respect to the application of the Spill 

Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule to certain 

farms, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Undertake 

5 Environmental Land Stewardship Act’’ or the ‘‘FUELS 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6765 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, 

2 AND COUNTERMEASURE RULE. 

3 Section 1049 of the Water Resources Reform and De4 velopment Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 1361 note) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking 

8 ‘‘20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘42,000’’; 

9 (B) by amending paragraph (2)(A) to read 

10 as follows: 

11 ‘‘(A) an aggregate aboveground storage ca12 pacity greater than 10,000 gallons but less than 

13 42,000 gallons; and’’; 

14 (C) in paragraph (3)— 

15 (i) by amending subparagraph (A) to 

16 read as follows: 

17 ‘‘(A) with an aggregate aboveground stor18 age capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 

19 gallons; and’’; and 

20 (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

21 ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a period; and 

22 (D) by striking paragraph (4); 

23 (2) in subsection (c)(2)(A)— 

24 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘1,000’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘1,320’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6765 IH

1 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘2,500’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘3,000’’; and 

3 (3) by striking subsection (d). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements filed by Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-137952 and 333-137953) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-148750) of our report dated March 13,
2009 with respect to the audit of the balance sheets of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/  Stegman & Company


Baltimore,
Maryland
March 16, 2009

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6634 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6634

To amend title XXVIII of the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the 
   sunset of authority to make certain appointments for the National 
            Disaster Medical System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2022

Ms. Schrier (for herself and Mr. Hudson) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XXVIII of the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the 
   sunset of authority to make certain appointments for the National 
            Disaster Medical System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE CERTAIN 
              APPOINTMENTS FOR THE NATIONAL DISASTER MEDICAL SYSTEM.

    Section 2812(c)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300hh-11(c)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(A) in general.--If the Secretary 
        determines'' and inserting ``If the Secretary determines''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B).
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Filed by the Registrant [X]





Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ]





Check the appropriate box:


[   ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement


[   ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))


[   ]  Definitive Proxy Statement


[X]  Definitive Additional Materials


[   ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12








CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATION


(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):


[X]  No fee required.


[   ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.





1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: ...................................................................................


2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ...................................................................................


3) Per unit price of other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): ......................................................


4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ................................................................................................


5) Total fee paid: ............................................................................................................................................................





[  ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.





[  ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.





1) Amount Previously Paid: ............................................................................................................................................





2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: ........................................................................................................





3) Filing Party: ................................................................................................................................................................





4) Date Filed: .................................................................................................................................................................










---










---













---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---










---












---










---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN CLARENCE GALLOWAY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00457-JAB; 1:06-cv-01022-JAB)

Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 29, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Clarence Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs,

Assistant United States Attorney, Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Clarence Galloway seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Galloway has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          44,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,917
<INVENTORY>                                    268,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               378,575
<PP&E>                                         831,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                 470,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,158,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,421
<BONDS>                                         88,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,425
<OTHER-SE>                                   (506,222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,158,047
<SALES>                                        602,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               615,045
<CGS>                                          478,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  478,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (38)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,507)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,091)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Adolph Bruck, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

January 29, 1957.

*Hahn & Golin*for executor.

*A. Lionel Levy*for State Tax Commission.

John D. Bennett, S.

This is a motion to reduce the penalty of 10% to 6% pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 249-z of the Tax Law which reads: “ In case the time of payment has not been extended by the tax commission and the tax or any portion thereof is subject to interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum, such interest may be reduced by the surrogate to six per centum per annum, if by reason of claims made upon the estate, necessary litigation or other unavoidable cause of delay the tax cannot be determined and paid as herein provided, but such reduction of interest shall be only for the period during which such cause of delay was operative ”.

The sole ground urged for this relief is a statement in the moving affidavit that the executor ‘1 believed that it was not necessary to file estate tax returns in this estate ’ ’. The affidavit does not, even prima facie, comply with the requirements of the statute (see *Matter of*Eisenberg, 184 Misc. 387; *Matter of Wormser,*51 App. Div. 441; *Matter of*Platt, 8 Misc. 144; cf. *Matter of*Minniss, 207 Misc. 327).

The foregoing authorities require that the motion be denied.

Submit order on notice.
Exhibit 1049(A)



		

			Exhibit 10.49

		




		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT
		

		
			 
		

		
			February 27, 2014
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear:
		

		
			 
		

		
			Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Aqua America Inc. 2009 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”), you have been granted restricted stock units as outlined below and in the attached Restricted Stock Unit Grant Terms and Conditions.
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Granted To:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Grant Date:

					
					
						February 27, 2014

				
	
					
						Number of Restricted Stock Units Granted:

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Vesting Date:

					
					
						February 27, 2017

				
	
					
						Vesting Schedule:

					
					
						100% on February 27, 2017

				



		
			 
		

		
			By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge and accept the award of this Restricted Stock Unit Grant and the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Terms and Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein, and I agree to be bound by the terms of the Restricted Stock Unit Grant, the Restricted Stock Unit Grant Terms and Conditions and the Plan. I hereby agree that all decisions and determinations of the Committee (as defined in the Plan) with respect to the restricted stock units shall be final and binding.



Signature: ________________________________________    Date: __________________________
		

		 


		

			DB1/ 74007686.1

		


		

			 

		


		

			Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please make the appropriate corrections on this form.
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Shore Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 7, 2004

  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 12(b)
                           J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
                         and Consolidated Subsidiaries

           Computation of Ratios of Available Income to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   52 weeks ended
                                        ------------------------------------
                                          Apr. 26,              Apr. 27,
($ Millions)                                1997                   1996
                                        -------------         --------------
<S>                                     <C>                   <C>    
Income from continuing operations          $  903                 $1,304
    (before income taxes and
    capitalized interest)

Fixed charges

Interest (including capitalized
interest) on:

    Operating leases                          110                    102
    Short term debt                           127                    120
    Long term debt                            341                    268
    Capital leases                              7                      5
    Credit facility                            19                      -
    Other, net                                  2                      1

                                           ------                 ------
Total fixed charges                           606                    496


                                           ------                 ------
Total available income                     $1,509                 $1,800
                                           ======                 ======

Ratio of available income to combined
    fixed charges and preferred stock
    dividend requirement                      2.5                    3.6
                                           ======                 ======
</TABLE>



The interest cost of the LESOP notes guaranteed by the Company is not included 
in fixed charges above.

The Company believes that, due to the seasonal nature of its business, ratios 
for a period of time other than a 52 week period are inappropriate.