alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


Amendment to Corporate Guaranty


 


 


This Amendment dated April 14, 2014 (the “Amendment”),
hereby amends that certain Corporate Guaranty dated August 23, 2013 (the “Guaranty”) provided by Twin Cities Power
Holdings, LLC (“Guarantor”) in favor of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”)
guaranteeing the obligations of Twin Cities Power, LLC, Summit Energy, LLC and Cygnus Energy Futures, LLC.


 


WHEREAS, Guarantor hereby desires to
amend the Guaranty to increase the amount stated in the Guaranty from $1,500,000 USD to $2,000,000 USD, as more fully described
below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
premises and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor agrees
as follows:


 


1.     The last sentence of Section 1 of the Guaranty
shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“The maximum aggregate liability
of Guarantor under this Guaranty is limited to the amount of $2,000,000 USD (Two Million U.S. Dollars), plus all costs and expenses
incurred by Transmission Provider in enforcing this Guaranty against Guarantor and the Agreements against Company (or any of TCP,
SE and/or CEF)(including attorneys’ fees).”


 


2.     Miscellaneous


 


		a)	Except as specifically amended hereby, the Guaranty shall continue in full
force and effect and nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver or modification of existing rights under the Guaranty,
except as such rights are expressly modified hereby. Guarantor hereby ratifies and confirms all of the terms of the Guaranty.



 


		b)	This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the jurisdiction that the Guaranty is governed by and construed in accordance with.



 


		c)	This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different parties hereto
on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which shall together constitute
one and the same instrument.



 


		d)	Unless the context requires otherwise, every reference in the Guaranty to the term “this
Agreement” shall be deemed to mean the original Guaranty as amended by this First Amendment. All capitalized terms not expressly
defined herein shall have the meaning otherwise ascribed to such term or terms in the Guaranty.



 


 


 



    	 



    	 



    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this document as of the date specified on the first page hereof.


 


 


Twin Cities Power Holdings, LLC


 


 


By: /s/ Timothy S. Krieger_______


 


Name: Timothy S. Krieger_______


 


Title: President/CEO____________


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 





 



 


 


 


 


 


INDS01 1452043v1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6256

UHURU ROWE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL CARPENTER; NANCY PERKERSON; TERESA L. BIRCKHEAD; T. 

DARDEN; GREGORY HALLOWAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00780-REP)

Submitted: November 2, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020

Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey E. Fogel, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney 

General, Victoria N. Pearson, Deputy Attorney General, Laura Maughan, Assistant 

Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor 

General, Martine E. Cicconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant 

Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Uhuru Rowe appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to 

dismiss and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowe v. 

Carpenter, No. 3:18-cv-00780-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Lydia L. WATSON, a widow, C. O. Watson and Ray M. Watson, Appellants, v. P. J. CHYNA and Alma Chyna, his wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Oct. 22, 1954.

Franks & Gordon and Ray.M. Watson,. Miami, for appellants.

Walton, Hubbard, Schroeder, Lantaff & Atkins, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause-have been examined and the" judgment appealed from is affirmed' on authority of Shaw v. Williams, Fla., 50 So.2d 125.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 15
                                                          ----------
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   The Board of Directors
   Polaroid Corporation
   
   
   Ladies and Gentlemen:
   
    Re:Registration statements No. 33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on Form
       S-3, No. 33-51173 on Form S-8, No. 333-0791 on Form S-3 No. 333-32279
       on Form S-8, No. 333-32281 on Form S-8, No. 333-32283 on Form S-8, and
       No. 333-32285 on Form S-8 of Polaroid Corporation.
   
   With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
   awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 16, 1997, related to
   our review of interim financial information.
   
   Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is
   not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
   accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
   meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
   
   
                                        Very truly yours,
                                        
                                        
                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
   
   
   Boston, Massachusetts
   August 12, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

HARRIET A. GILLIAM

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2886 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 73 DB 2022

(Supreme Court of New York, Appellate

Division: Second Judicial Department, 

No. 2017-00590)

Attorney Registration No. 31858

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2022, upon consideration of the responses to 

a Notice and Order directing Respondent to provide reasons against the imposition of 

reciprocal discipline, Harriet A. Gilliam is disbarred from the practice of law in the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. She shall comply with all provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
EXHIBIT 12.1

STANLEY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES        (in thousands, except ratio of earnings to fixed charges)

The following table sets forth our consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the periods shown. Currently, we have no shares of preferred stock
outstanding and have not paid any dividends on preferred stock in the periods shown. Therefore, the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends is not different from the
ratio of earnings to fixed charges.

Fiscal year ended March 31,2010

2009

2008

2007

2006Fixed charges:Interest expense


3,152


5,095


3,875


6,002


2,468Amortization of deferred financing costs


708


606


375


339


44Interest within rental expense(1)


4,584


4,106


2,906


2,270


1,698Total fixed charges


8,444


9,807


7,156


8,611


4,210Earnings:Income before income taxes


75,959


61,284


44,135


18,181


13,958Fixed charges included in earnings


8,444


9,807


7,156


8,611


4,210Earnings available before fixed charges


84,403


71,091


51,291


26,792


18,168Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


10.0


7.2


7.2


3.1


4.3


---

---



QuickLinks
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 333-20803

                                 $1,000,000,000
                                    CITICORP
                       Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series E
                    Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series E
                Due From 9 Months to 50 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing Supplement, dated August 5, 1997
(To Prospectus Supplement, dated May 21, 1997,
 to Prospectus, dated May 21, 1997).

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The terms of the Notes set forth in this Pricing Supplement supplement and
modify, to the extent applicable, the description of general terms and
provisions of Citicorp's Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series E, set forth in
the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement. Capitalized terms not
defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.

SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:                 7.10% Subordinated Notes Due September 4, 2012
                                (the "Notes").

Aggregate Principal
Amount:                         $20,000,000.00.

Price to Public:                100.00%.

Issue Date:                     September 4, 1997.

Stated Maturity Date:           September 4, 2012.

Interest Rate:                  7.10%.

Interest Payment Dates:         Monthly, on the 4th day of each month,
                                commencing in October 1997, and at Stated
                                Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:           The fifteenth calender day prior to the related
                                Interest Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:                   None.

Redemption:                     The Notes are subject to redemption, in whole
                                but not in part, at the option of Citicorp, on
                                not more than 60 or less than 30 days' notice,
                                on any Interest Payment Date occurring in March
                                or September, on or after September 4, 2001, at
                                a redemption price of 100% of their principal
                                amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the
                                redemption date.

<PAGE>

Selling Agent:                  Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.

Agent's Commission:             2.00%.

Minimum Denomination:           $1,000.

CUSIP Number:                   17303 MGY 9.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clyburn Leroy MOSES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7335.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Clyburn Leroy Moses, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*168PER CURIAM.

Clyburn Leroy Moses seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Moses has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Moses,*Nos. CR-00-215; CA-01-961-1 (M.D.N.C. July 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**EXHIBIT 31**

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-5 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a  materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Greenpoint MortgageCompany.

Date:  March 15, 2007

  /s/ Thomas G. LehmannName:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131849 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131849 

 COA: 267814 

Ingham CC: 95-069404-FC

RICHARD RAYMOND,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
----

|                    | Nature      Vision, Inc.                                                                                                                                                            |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Date:      May 13, 2008 | By:      /s/ Jeffrey P.      Zernov                         |
|                    | Jeffrey      P. Zernov                                                                                                                                                              |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer and President                                                                                                                                          |
|                    | (principal      executive officer)                                                                                                                                                  |
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Date:      May 13, 2008 | By:      /s/ David M.      Kolkind                                    |
|                    | David      M. Kolkind                                                                                                                                                               |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                        |
|                    | (principal      financial officer)                                                                                                                                                  |

----
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6813 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through 

the Director of the National Institutes of Health, to conduct a study 

on the neurological impacts of COVID–19 on individuals with a neurological disease. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2022 

Mr. KEATING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

acting through the Director of the National Institutes 

of Health, to conduct a study on the neurological impacts 

of COVID–19 on individuals with a neurological disease. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON THE NEUROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF 

4 COVID–19 ON INDIVIDUALS WITH A NEURO5 LOGICAL DISEASE. 

6 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Health and Human 

7 Services, acting through the Director of the National In8 stitutes of Health, shall conduct a study on the neuroVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:39 Apr 07, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6813.IH H6813

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6813 IH

1 logical impacts of COVID–19 on individuals with a neuro2 logical disease. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services shall complete the study under subsection 

6 (a) and submit to the Congress a report on the results 

7 of such study. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            9280
<SECURITIES>                                       150
<RECEIVABLES>                                   171640
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1786
<INVENTORY>                                     197155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                430974
<PP&E>                                         3473800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1515549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2461518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           400474
<BONDS>                                         701798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         32722
<OTHER-SE>                                      861565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2461518
<SALES>                                         438583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                438583
<CGS>                                           387223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   387223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3994
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2436
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31(a)

I, Thomas M. Patrick, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 9, 2005

  /s/  Thomas M. Patrick