alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Porter Bancorp, Inc.



|                           |  |                              |  |                           
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Direct Subsidiary          |  | Jurisdiction of Organization |  | Does Business As          
|PBI Bank                   |  | Kentucky                     |  | PBI Bank                  
|Asencia Statutory Trust I  |  | Connecticut                  |  | Asencia Statutory Trust I 
|Porter Statutory Trust II  |  | Connecticut                  |  | Porter Statutory Trust II 
|Porter Statutory Trust III |  | Connecticut                  |  | Porter Statutory Trust III
|Porter Statutory Trust IV  |  | Connecticut                  |  | Porter Statutory Trust IV 



|                                  |  |                              |  |                                   |  |              
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Indirect Subsidiary               |  | Jurisdiction of Organization |  | Does Business As                  |  | Parent Entity
|PBI Title Services, LLC           |  | Kentucky                     |  | PBI Title Services, LLC           |  | PBI Bank     
|Durham-Mudd InsuranceAgency, Inc. |  | Kentucky                     |  | Durham-Mudd InsuranceAgency, Inc. |  | PBI Bank
EX-35 (b)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MO 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 13, 2007

Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Home
Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-HE2

Per Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 4/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such Servicing Function Participant's performance
     under this Agreement, or such other applicable agreement in the case of a
     Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officer's
     supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant (other
     than the related Servicer, the Master Servicer or the Securities
     Administrator), in all material respects throughout such year or portion
     thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in
     any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer
     and the nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6739 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to issue a rule 

before deleting or modifying certain small business loan data, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. HILL, and Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

to issue a rule before deleting or modifying certain small 

business loan data, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RULEMAKING REQUIREMENT. 

4 Section 704B(e)(4) of Equal Credit Opportunity Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 1691c–2(e)(4)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘The Bureau may,’’ and insert7 ing: 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Bureau may,’’; 

9 and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6739 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(B) RULEMAKING REQUIREMENT.—The 

3 Bureau shall, before deleting or modifying data 

4 under this paragraph issue, through advance 

5 notice and comment, a rule that includes a de6 scription of what modifications and deletions 

7 the Bureau intends to make to the data and 

8 how such modifications and deletions will ad9 vance a privacy interest.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 18






November 13, 2001




Board of Directors
Phillips Petroleum Company
Phillips Building
Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74004

Members of the Board of Directors:

Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of
Phillips Petroleum Company included in its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, describes a
change in the method of accounting for the costs of major
maintenance turnarounds from the "accrue-in-advance" method to
the "expense-as-incurred" method.  There are no authoritative
criteria for determining a "preferable" method of accounting for
major maintenance turnaround costs based on the particular
circumstances; however, we conclude that such change in the
method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method
which, based on your business judgment to make this change and
for the stated reasons, is preferable in your circumstances.  We
have not conducted an audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of any financial
statements of the Company as of any date or for any period
subsequent to December 31, 2000, and therefore we do not express
any opinion on any financial statements of the Company subsequent
to that date.

                                Very truly yours,



                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                Ernst & Young LLP
                                Tulsa, Oklahoma


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51294-51295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP08-460-000]


Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Expedited Comment Date 
and Petition of the Indicated Shippers for Immediate Injunctive Relief 
and an Expedited Technical Conference

August 15, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 13, 2008, the Indicated Shippers 
(ConocoPhillips Company, Shell Energy North America (US), L.P., and 
Yates Petroleum Corporation) filed a petition for immediate injunctive 
relief and an expedited technical conference. The Indicated Shippers 
request the Commission to enjoin Rockies Express

[[Page 51295]]

Pipeline LLC from engaging in hydrostatic testing on a portion of its 
pipeline beginning September 3, 2008, and anticipated to end September 
26, 2008.
    The petition is on file with the Commission and open for public 
inspection. This petition is available for review at the Commission in 
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c68083948589a8aaafa8a395b3b6b6a9b4b286a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96d0d3c4d5d9f8fafff8f3c5e3e6e6f9e4e2d6f0f3e4f5b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a> or toll free at (866) 208-3676, or for 
TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
    Any person desiring to intervene in this proceeding or to be heard 
in response to the petition must file in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure by the date designated 
below. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of 
comments, protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of 
paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' 
link.
    Comment Date: August 20, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20211 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K in accordance with Rule 15(d)-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Red Trail Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Bachmeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald BachmeierGerald BachmeierChief Executive OfficerDated: March 31, 2011
#### Lillian Betts, Plaintiff, *v.*Edwin Murray et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 17, 1956.

*Elliot J. Lefkowitz*for Edwin Murray, defendant.

*Morris Zweibel*for plaintiff:

Matthew M. Levy, J.

This, is a motion by defendant Murray to vacate a default judgment entered against him, and for other relief.

The accident occurred on January 1, 1950. Plaintiff, claims personal service of process.on the moving defendant on November 16,. 1950. There was no appearance or answer. Plaintiff did not- proceed thereon. An order for substituted, service, grounded upon affidavits sworn to December- 26, and. 28, 1951, was obtained on January *é-,*1952; and filed with proof of service on January 10, 1952. There was no appearance or answer thereto, Plaintiff proceeded .some years later- by. way of default, and an. inquest, held: February 29, 1956, resulted in a judgment being entered on April 12,1956-for-$7;632;85 against the moving defendant. The defendant claims nonservice of process, either personally or substituted. He also asserts noncompliance with rule-190 of the Buies of Civil Practice which provides that where a default judgment is not taken, within one year after the default, “ at least'five days? notice-of the time and place- of the application [to the court] for judgment ” must be given to the defendant.

Plaintiff requests that, if the court open the default and grant defendant permission to appear and answer, defendant' be required to post a bond in the amount of'the-present judgment as security for- the protection, of plaintiff.. Plaintiff misunderstands the .nature of the relief, prayed for. by defendant. Defendant does not move to., open, his default as a matter of discretion. He seeks-to vacate? the:default judgment as a matter of right: Since the file? does, not disclose, and. plaintiff .'does not assert, that there was notice to. defendant as required by rulé 190, or *186that *“*such notice ” was (as therein provided) *“*dispensed with by order of the court or judge upon good cause shown”, the inquest and judgment must be vacated. .

In the circumstances, it is not incumbent upon me to resolve directly or by way of reference the disputed issue of. service of process. That is a matter which will have to be determined if and when plaintiff proceeds upon due notice to enter judgment by default or defendant seeks to vacate the alleged service of process or to open his default thereunder.

An order has been entered accordingly vacating the inquest and judgment herein.
[LETTERHEAD OF BANK OF AMERICA]



                          Servicer Compliance Statement
                               RAAC 2006-SP2 TRUST

     I, H. Randall Chestnut, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. as
seller and as  servicer,  hereby  certify  pursuant to section  2.04 of the Flow
Mortgage  Loan Sale and  Servicing  Agreement  dated  December  1, 2006  between
Residential  Funding  Company,  LLC, as purchaser (the  "Purchaser") and Bank of
America,  N.A. as seller (the "Seller") and as servicer (the  "Servicer")  that;
(i) a review of Bank of America,  N.A.  activities during the 2006 calendar year
and of its  performance  under the Agreement and any  applicable  Reconstitution
Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the
best of my knowledge,  based on such review, Bank of America, N.A. has fulfilled
all of its  obligations  under this Agreement and any applicable  Reconstitution
Agreement in all material  respects  throughout the 2006 calendar year. March 1,
2007




                                            By:    /s/ H. Randall Chestnut
                                            Name:  H. Randall Chestnut
                                            Title: Senior Vice President



                                                                        GMAC RFC
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6685 

To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to prioritize the acceptance 

of high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel from certain civilian 

nuclear power reactors, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. LEVIN of California (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. PETERS, Mrs. STEEL, Ms. 

PORTER, and Mrs. KIM of California) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to prioritize 

the acceptance of high-level radioactive waste or spent 

nuclear fuel from certain civilian nuclear power reactors, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spent Fuel 

5 Prioritization Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6685 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE PRIORITY FOR HIGH-LEVEL RADIO2 ACTIVE WASTE AND SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL. 

3 Section 302(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 

4 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(a)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(7) In determining the order in which the Secretary 

7 will accept high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear 

8 fuel for disposal or storage, the Secretary shall prioritize 

9 high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel from a 

10 civilian nuclear power reactor based on the operating sta11 tus of the civilian nuclear power reactor, the population 

12 of the area in which the civilian nuclear power reactor is 

13 located, the earthquake hazard of the area in which the 

14 civilian nuclear power reactor is located, and national se15 curity risk related to the continued storage of high-level 

16 radioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel in the area in which 

17 the civilian nuclear power reactor is located, giving highest 

18 priority to a civilian nuclear power reactor that is— 

19 ‘‘(A) decommissioned or decommissioning; 

20 ‘‘(B) located in an area, as determined by the 

21 Secretary, the population of which is the largest; 

22 ‘‘(C) located in an area with the highest hazard 

23 of an earthquake, as indicated by the Seismic Haz24 ard Maps published by the Director of the United 

25 States Geological Survey pursuant to section 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6685 IH

1 5(b)(3)(J) of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction 

2 Act of 1977; and 

3 ‘‘(D) located in an area, as determined by the 

4 Secretary (in consultation with the Secretary of De5 fense and the Secretary of Homeland Security), 

6 where the continued storage of high-level radioactive 

7 waste or spent nuclear fuel poses a significant na8 tional security concern.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-35 (f)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 01, 2007

Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.
4 World Financial Center
New York, NY 10281

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors
Trust, Series 2006-A2

Per Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 04/01/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(i)   A review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
      portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
      such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
      Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision.

(ii)  To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
      has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
      applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, in
      all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
      there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
      respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature
      and status thereof.

(iii) Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
      extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements, certifications
      or assertions herein are subject to the following): instances of
      noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the applicable
      reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.


Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers
Barry Akers
Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


(page)


Schedule A

Reporting Errors

During the reporting period, one or more of the monthly investor reports
contained certain types of errors in regard to the calculation and or the
reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets. To the best of the signing
officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been material,
has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has been
disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the reporting
period.
EX-33 (a)
(logo) REGULUS


Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1. Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 - Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. section
   229. 1100-229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, is
   responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria
   applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who
   are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have
   requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with loan and/or
   receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities
   transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a service whereby
   check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected,
   processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for
   deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment.

2. The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used
   in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the
   servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of
   Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
   respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
   Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth
   in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it
   performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in
   the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria.

3. As of and for the year ending December 31, 2006, Regulus has complied in all
   material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item
   1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4. KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
   report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
   Criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2006. A copy of that
   attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.


/s/ Kimberlee Clark
Kimberlee Clark
Chief Financial Officer

July 17, 2007
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                     FORM 15

             Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration
    under 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Suspension of Duty
               to File Reports Under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        Commission File Number 333-72459

                       CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
           (Issuer in respect of the REMIC Pass-Through Certificates)
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                         12855 North Outer Forty Drive
                           St. Louis, Missouri 63141
                                 (314) 851-6305
          (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
            area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

                     REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1999-7
            (Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)

                                 Not Applicable
   (Titles of all other classes of securities for which a duty to file reports
                      under Section 13(a) or 15(d)remains)

         Please place an X in the box(es) to designate the appropriate rule
provision(s) relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to file reports:

      Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(i)       [ ]        Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii)      [ ]
      Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii)      [ ]        Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(i)       [ ]
      Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(i)       [ ]        Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(ii)      [ ]
      Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(ii)      [ ]        Rule 15d-6                [x]
      Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i)       [ ]

Approximate number of holders of record as of the certification or
notice date: 36

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc. has caused this certification/notice to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.


Dated as of: January 28, 2000                BY:   /s/ Michael J. Tarpley
                                                   --------------------------
                                                       Michael J. Tarpley
                                                       Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATE
OF CEO AND CFO
  (1)
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificate is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ Jackie L. ReedJackie L. Reed, CEO/s/ Teresa L. MartinTeresa L. Martin, CFO