U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Why Were So Many Sexual Assault Kits Not Tested in Detroit?

April 1, 2014
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
See reuse policy
Speakers
        Rebecca Campbell, Ph.D.
Watch Rebecca Campbell discuss the five primary reasons that Detroit developed a large number of sexual assault kits that were not submitted to the crime lab for DNA-testing. Dr. Campbell also talks about how these risk factors" could apply to other jurisdictions.
  
  
          Transcript
April 2014 interview with Dr. Rebecca Campbell, Ph.D., Michigan State University

One of the things that we looked at in the Detroit project was to try to understand how do you get this problem? How do you get so many untested sexual assault kits? What are the risk factors in a community for developing this problem? So one of the things we did in our project was try to take a step back and study how do you develop a large number of untested sexual assault kits? What are the contextual risk factors?

In trying to answer that question, we wanted to take a systemic approach. And by systemic I mean what was happening not just in the police department, but in the relationship between the police and the crime lab; and between the police, the crime lab, and the prosecutor’s office; the police, the crime lab, the prosecutor’s office, and the medical system, because you don’t have a kit that will sit in property if the medical system didn’t collect it in the first place. So what was happening in the medical system over time? Where was victim advocacy throughout this whole process? So to understand how and why a community has so many untested kits—or to put it another way, what are the risk factors for communities developing this problem—you have to look at all of these different systems.

One of the main risk factors we found was that there was no policy or protocol. So the decision regarding whether an individual kit would be tested was made on an individual basis. So an individual police officer would make a decision whether a kit would be tested, yes or no; laboratory, yes or no; or a prosecutor, yes or no. There was no broad-based policy that said “This is what ought to happen in all cases or under these kinds of cases.” No protocol in place that dictated what we should be doing regarding kit testing.

It was very much case by case. The decision of whether a kit was going to be tested in Detroit over the 30-year history that we looked at, it was on a case-by-case basis. So that is a key risk factor. If you leave that kind of decision to the discretion of individual people, one by one by one, case by case by case, they can make the decision not to test it, and they can make that decision a lot. And over time, you can get a very large number of kits sitting in police property.

A second risk factor we found was the person power, the personnel available to do the testing and to work these cases. So for example, in Detroit we found that the Detroit Crime Lab had two DNA scientists. Two scientists. Now that sounds low, and it is objectively low, so we looked at comparisons in other cities that have similar crime rates, similar populations. In the same period of time, they had 6, 8, 10, 14, 20 or more DNA scientists. Detroit had two.

The time period that we’re looking at here is from 1980 to 2009. So over that period of time, the Detroit Police Department sex crimes unit had two 50-percent reductions in their staffing levels to work on sex crimes cases. Then we turned to the prosecutor’s office. A lot of talk at the national level about best practice is to have a designated unit to work on sexual assault cases. They certainly had the interest; they didn’t have the person power. They were not able to form a designated sexual assault team until 2009.

And that’s important because then you don’t have a designated unit to be able to constantly check back with the police: “What’s your policy? What’s your protocol? What are you doing? Hey, laboratory: what’s your policy? What’s your protocol?” They were handling all levels of felonies, all types of crimes, day in, day out. They did not have the resources for a dedicated unit to watch and to talk with and to collaborate with the other pieces in the criminal justice system to say, “What are you doing with sexual assault cases?”

Another key risk factor we found for developing this problem was constant transitions in leadership. So for example, at the Detroit Police Department, the police chief turned over every 2.2 years, so a little over every two years, there’s a new chief. And if it was just the chief, that might be one thing. But what we found was that the transition wasn’t just at the chief level; it trickled down, all the way down to the supervising officer, the supervising personnel of the sex crimes unit. So about every 2.2 years, whole new sheriff in town, whole new leadership team in town. So the idea that you could have a problem and that it would be developing and that nobody would know about it, well that’s very easy to understand if you’re turning over your leadership every 2.2 years. Or alternatively, you identify that there is a problem, and you’re trying to mount a response to it. Well, it’s going to take more than 2.2 years to try to really remedy the situation. So a constant transition in leadership makes it difficult to identify large-scale problems and makes it incredibly difficult to respond to them.

So the medical system was feeding doubt into the legal system about whether the kit was even useful. Because the people collecting the kits were not specially trained, didn’t really understand how that evidence could be useful in an investigation. So they had years and years and years of hospital emergency room department doctors saying, “Well, I collected the kit, but I don’t know if it’ll be useful to you.” So you have to understand what was the relationship between medical and legal over the time that kits were developing. Or another way to put it: A risk factor for developing this problem is not having a good relationship between medical and legal. If the medical system and the legal system are not working together, if there’s not good medical forensic services available in a community, it can contribute to a large number of untested sexual assault kits.

And in Detroit, they did not have community-based advocacy services, by and large, over the time that these kits were collected. So they didn’t have someone from the nonprofit social service agency, like a rape crisis center, that would be available to help victims in hospital emergency departments and advocate on their behalf for the police. What we found was that over the period of time that these kits were accumulating, Detroit had, on average, one—*one* victim advocate. Not one agency. One advocate trying to serve this entire city, to provide emotional support, informational support to victims, and to do that advocacy with the police, to say, “Hey, where’s her kit? What’s happening with her kit? What’s happening with his kit?” So again, how does this contribute to a large number of untested kits? If you don’t have those agitators, if you don’t have the advocates providing support to the victims so the victim can ask for himself or herself, or the advocate stepping in to say, “Hey, what’s happening with rape kits in this community?” you can see how more and more of them are going to be accumulating over time.

So these risk factors that we identified in Detroit I think do have applicability to other jurisdictions. It may not play out the same way in every city, every town, every state. And certainly the resource challenges that we’ve had in Detroit are different than what they’ve had in other communities throughout the United States. But I think the underlying messages are important, and I think the underlying findings are important and can apply to other jurisdictions. Ask: Do you have a policy and protocol? What’s been happening with staffing? Do you have enough staff to respond to this? What’s been happening with leadership and transitions and supervision of the sex crimes unit? Where has the medical system been involved and what kind of collaboration is going on between medical and legal? Where’s victim advocacy? Those are universal issues. Those are the things that affect how a sexual assault kit is processed, how an investigation proceeds, how prosecution unfolds. So understanding in each and every community what is happening in those key factors and whether they’re risk factors in each community is important to understand.
    
  
Disclaimer:
              Opinions or points of view expressed in these recordings represent those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Any commercial products and manufacturers discussed in these recordings are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice.
  
Date Published: April 1, 2014
    
          Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsImpact of COVID-19 on School Safety - Roundtable Discussion,  NIJ Virtual Conference on School Safety
                  Developing and Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in School Safety - Plenary Discussion, NIJ Virtual Conference on School Safety
                  Causes and Consequences of School Violence - Plenary Discussion, NIJ Virtual Conference on School Safety
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov