alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  Banc of America Funding Corporation
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2006-D

  I, Chris Regnier, a Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the
  "Master Servicer"), certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of the Banc of America Funding 2006-D Trust (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     master servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review
     conducted in preparing the master servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, in all material
     respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Bank of America, National Association, Countrywide Home Loans
     Servicing LP, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. and IndyMac
     Bank, F.S.B.




     Dated:    May 30, 2008

     /s/ Chris Regnier
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134021 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134021 

 COA: 264889 

Oakland CC: 2005-201614-FH 

MICHAEL LEE PHILLIPS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
#### WORRELL et al. v. LIFE & CASUALTY INS. CO. OF TENNESSEE.

No. 1728.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 30, 1937.

For former opinion, see 172 So. 788.

W. A. Benton, of Baton Rouge, for appellants.

Ashton L. Stewart, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

DORE, Judge.

The facts and issues involved in this case are fully given in our original opinion. See 172 So. 788.

We had granted a rehearing in this matter upon the plaintiff contending that we had not grasped the point at issue, thereby giving unto the plaintiff an opportunity to make the issue more plainly to us. But our reexamination of the case has served to convince us more firmly of the correctness of our original decree.

Our former decree is therefore reinstated and made the final judgment of the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration  

          - [TA-W-63,271]  

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 12, 2008, applicable to workers of Horton Automatics, including on-site leased workers from Remedy Staffing, Corpus Christi, Texas. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 27, 2008 (73 FR 36575).                  

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the subassembly of parts for automatic windows and doors.  

New information shows that Horton Automatics is a subsidiary of Overhead Door Corporation and that some of the workers wages at the subject firm are being reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Overhead Door Corporation.  

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to include workers of the subject firm whose UI wages are reported under the parent firm, Overhead Door Corporation.  

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,271 is hereby issued as follows:  

“Workers engaged in the subassembly of parts at Horton Automatics, a subsidiary of Overhead Door Corporation, including on-site leased workers from Remedy Staffing, Corpus Christi, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after April 10, 2007, through June 12, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.”

Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of August 2008.  

Linda G. Poole,  

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-20347 Filed 9-2-08; 8:45 am]  

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Chyron Corporation

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-01861) of Chyron Corporation of our report dated March 1, 2006, except for Note 18, which is as of March 20, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman LLP

Melville, New York

March 31, 2006
#### In the Matter of Chester W. Austin et al., Petitioners, against Mary Slavik et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County,

October 15, 1956.

*Reginald C. Smith*for petitioners.

*Lloyd P. Dodge, County Attorney,*for Suffolk County.

L. Barron Hill, J.

-This is a proceeding to compel the registration of the petitioners as voters in the Forty-ninth Election District, Town of Islip, Suffolk County, New York. Petitioners reside in said election district, having lived there physically since September 29, 1956. Petitioners previously resided in Queens County. They contracted to purchase their present home on October 12, 1955, with closing scheduled for May, 1956. Construction was completed on September 17, 1956. Since the signing of the contract, petitioners have been ready to make the premises their home as soon as it was ready for occupancy. Section 1 of article II of the Constitution of the State of New York requires petitioners to be residents of Suffolk County for a period of four months prior to the election to enable them to vote. Having moved from Queens County in September, 1956, petitioners are no longer permitted to vote there (N. Y. Const., art. II, § 1). It is generally conceded that the term *‘*‘ resident ’ ’, as employed in the Constitution, means domicile *(Matter of Wooley,*108 N. Y. S. 2d 165, 168). An identical situation was presented to the Hon. James T. Hallinan, now a Justice of the Appellate Division of this department, sitting in Special Term, Nassau County, in October, 1936, in *Matter of Messiter.*The order therein directed that those petitioners be placed on the registered list of voters. This court is advised that this practice has been followed ever since in Nassau County. The right to vote is a cherished one, which must be kept in mind when construing the Election Law. On the facts presented in this petition I find that these petitioners are residents of Suffolk County for the requisite period of four months, and I direct that their names be placed on the rolls of registered voters of the Forty-ninth Election District, Town *747of Islip, Suffolk County, New York. For clarification, this decision is limited to the facts presented, i.e., a physical possession of the premises 30 days prior to the election after a contract to purchase executed more than four months prior to the election, coupled with an intention of at least four months ’ duration to make the premises a permanent voting residence or domicile. The question of intention of course being a question of fact in each instance.

Submit order.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commercial Property Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, David C. Merrell, President and Corie Merrell of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Date: 9/14/2004                             /s/David C. Merrell
     ----------                            ---------------------
                                           David C. Merrell
                                           President and director

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/Corie Merrell
     ----------                            ----------------------
                                           Corie Merrell
                                           Secretary/Treasurer and
                                           director
V 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 680 

For the relief of Arpita Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, and Vandana Kurdekar. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2021 

Ms. KUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Arpita Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, and 

Vandana Kurdekar. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ARPITA 

4 KURDEKAR, GIRISH KURDEKAR, AND 

5 VANDANA KURDEKAR. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Arpita Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, and Vandana 

9 Kurdekar shall each be eligible for issuance of an immi10 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

11 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 680 IH

1 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec2 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

3 permanent resident. 

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Arpita Kurdekar, 

5 Girish Kurdekar, or Vandana Kurdekar enters the United 

6 States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 

7 he or she shall be considered to have entered and remained 

8 lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for ad9 justment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 

10 and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica15 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Arpita Kurdekar, Girish Kurdekar, and Vandana 

20 Kurdekar, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

21 officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following 

22 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

23 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

24 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

25 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 680 IH

1 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

2 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Arpita Kurdekar, Girish 

6 Kurdekar, and Vandana Kurdekar shall not, by virtue of 

7 such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or sta8 tus under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20972 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSEPH OMOWALE, also known as JOSEPH TERRON BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-294-1

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Omowale appeals his guilty-plea conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues that the factual basis for his guilty plea, which showed his intrastate possession of a firearm manufactured outside the state, was insufficient to establish the nexus with interstate commerce required by 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He surmises, in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions inNo. 01-20972 -2- Jones v. United States , 529 U.S. 848 (2000), United States v. Morrison , 529 U.S. 598 (2000), and United States v. Lopez , 514 U.S. 549 (1995), that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) can no longer be constitutionally “construed to cover the intrastate possession of a firearm merely because it traveled across state lines at some point in the past.” He acknowledges that his claim is foreclosed by existing Fifth Circuit precedent and states that he raises the claim solely to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. Omowale’s claim is indeed foreclosed by circuit precedent.
See United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Rawls , 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers of C&F Financial Corporation



 EXHIBIT 10.15 
  
 BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF 
  
 C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
  

The following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) in effect as of January 1, 2005 of the current named executive officers of C&F Financial
Corporation: 
  

				
	 Larry G. Dillon
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	218,000
		
	 Thomas F. Cherry
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	155,000
		
	 Robert L. Bryant
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	155,000
		
	 Bryan E. McKernon
President and Chief Executive Officer of
C&F Mortgage Corporation
	  	$	150,000
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-14CB
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-14CB


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|March 22, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ HENRY R. BAUGHMAN                            
|               |  |  |  |  |  | Henry R. Baughman                                
|               |  |  |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  
|               |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ JAMES M. DAHMUS                              
|               |  |  |  |  |  | James M. Dahmus                                  
|               |  |  |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

** **

**LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Douglas A. Potolsky, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to befiled in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain anyuntrue statement of a  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with Servicing Criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with Servicing Criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche BankNational Trust Company.

 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Doug Potolsky                                                                            |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  DougPotolsky                                                                     |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |