alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                    ANNUAL COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR DIRECTORS
                                       OF
                        FELCOR LODGING TRUST INCORPORATED

      On October 26, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the following
compensation program for directors of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (the
"Company") for their service, commencing in 2005:

      1. Annual Service: Each non-employee director will receive a number of
shares of common stock of the Company having a value equal to $35,000, except
that amount shall be $40,000 for members of the Audit Committee other than the
Chairman and $45,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

      2. Board of Director Meeting Participation: Each director not otherwise
being compensated by the Company will receive $1,000 for each Board of Director
meeting attended in person and $500 for each additional telephonic meeting in
which he or she participates, payable in common stock or cash, at each
director's election.

      3. Committee Compensation: If a member of the Audit Committee attends more
than five Audit Committee meetings during the year, he or she will receive
$1,000 for each additional meeting attended in person and $500 for each
additional telephonic meeting in which he or she participates. Members of the
Compensation, Corporate Governance and Executive Committees will receive $1,000
for each meeting of their respective committees attended by them in person and
$500 for each telephonic meeting of their respective committees attended
telephonically. All are payable either in common stock or cash, at each
director's election.

      4. Annual Equity Award: Each non-employee director will receive an annual
equity award equal to the lesser of (i) 2,000 shares of common stock or (ii) the
number of shares of common stock having a value equal to $20,000 for 2005,
$25,000 for 2006, $30,000 for 2007, $35,000 for 2008 and $40,000 for 2009 and
thereafter.

      All shares of common stock will be issued under one or more of the
Company's Restricted Stock and Stock Option Plans. The number of shares to be
issued will be calculated by dividing (i) the applicable dollar amount
(including amounts for which the director has elected to receive common stock),
by (ii) the closing price of the common stock on the date annual grants are
awarded, and rounded to the nearest whole lot of 100 shares.
#### Dennis Jackson MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6422.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 2002.

Decided Nov. 7, 2002.

Dennis Jackson Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Jackson Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Moore has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See Moore v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-342-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 33-59791


                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $7,000,000,000
                    Global Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series C
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                 Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series C
                Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing  Supplement,  dated  January 5, 1996
     (To  Prospectus  Supplement, dated August 7, 1995;
     to Prospectus, dated August 7, 1995)

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The terms of the Subordinated  Notes set forth in this Pricing  Supplement
supplement  and modify,  to the extent  applicable,  the  description of general
terms and provisions of Citicorp's Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series
C,  set  forth  in  the  accompanying   Prospectus  and  Prospectus  Supplement.
Capitalized  terms not defined  herein shall have the meanings  assigned to such
terms in the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.


SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:               6.49% Subordinated Notes Due January 11, 2011
                              (the "Notes").
Aggregate
Principal Amount:             $10,000,000.00.

Price to Public:              100.00%

Issue Date:                   January 10, 1996.

Stated Maturity:              January 11, 2011.

Interest Rate:                6.49% per annum.

Interest Payment Dates:       Semi-annually on the 15th day of each February and
                              August,  commencing  February  15,  1996,  and  at
                              Stated Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:         The first day of the month in which each Interest
                              Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:                 None.

Redemption:                   The Notes are not subject to redemption.

Selling Agent:                Smith Barney, Inc.

Agent's Commission:           .933%.

CUSIP Number:                 17303 MEN 5.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11


                          J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.
                         and Consolidated Subsidiaries

                  Computation of Net Income Per Common Share
                  -------------------------------------------
              (Amounts in millions except per common share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                       39 Weeks Ended
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Oct. 26, 1996    Oct. 28, 1995
                                             ---------------  ---------------
                                             Shares   Income  Shares   Income
                                             ------   ------  ------   ------
<S>                                          <C>      <C>     <C>      <C> 
Primary:
-------
 
Net income                                            $  471           $  512
Dividend on Series B ESOP convertible
 preferred stock (after-tax)                             (30)             (31)
                                                      ------           ------
Adjusted net income                                      441              481
 
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding                                  225.5            227.6
Common stock equivalents:
 Stock options and other dilutive effects       2.8              2.6
                                             ------   ------  ------   ------
                                              228.3   $  441   230.2   $  481
                                             ======   ======  ======   ======
 
Net income per common share                           $ 1.93           $ 2.09
                                                      ======           ======
 
 
 
 
Fully diluted:
-------------
 
Net income                                            $  471           $  512
Tax benefit differential on ESOP dividend
 assuming stock is fully converted                        (2)              (1)
Assumed additional contribution to ESOP
 if preferred stock is fully converted                    (1)              (4)
                                                      ------           ------
Adjusted net income                                      468              507
 
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding (primary)                        228.3            230.2
Maximum dilution                                0.3              0.0
Convertible preferred stock                    19.5             20.7
                                             ------   ------  ------   ------
                                              248.1   $  468   250.9   $  507
                                             ======   ======  ======   ======
          
Net income per common share                           $ 1.89           $ 2.02
                                                      ======           ======
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENTCAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE TRUST 2006-A**

CapitalOne Auto Finance Trust 2006-A

Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.

c/o 1680 Capital One Drive

McLean,Virginia 22102

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One AutoFinance Trust 2006-A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 (the “Report”),the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.(the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

1.               A review of the activities and performance ofthe Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 4, 2006, byand between Capital One Auto Finance Trust 2006-A, as Issuer, Capital One AutoReceivables, LLC, as Seller, The Bank of New York (as successor to JPMorganChase Bank, N.A.), as Indenture Trustee, and the Servicer (the “Agreement”)during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under mysupervision.

2.               To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of theReport except as described below.

3.               In certain instances, repossessed vehicleswere not charged off in a timely manner. To address this issue, COAF has updated its processing system forvehicle sales at auction and enhanced management controls for this function.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 28th day of March, 2007

CAPITALONE AUTO FINANCE, INC.
| By:    |   | /s/ David R. Lawson     |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:  |   | David R. Lawson         |   |   |
| Title: |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clifford A. Reid,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Complete Genomics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Complete Genomics, Inc.



|    |  |                                    
|--- |  | -----------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/  Clifford A. Reid Ph.D.        
|    |  | Name:   Clifford A. Reid Ph.D.     
|    |  | Title:      Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 30, 2011
#### MILLER v. COMMERCIAL STANDARD INS. CO. et al. (two cases).

Nos. 2526, 2525.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 30, 1943.

For former opinions, see 13 So.2d 740.

Lewis & Lewis, of Opelousas, for appellant.

Durrett & Hardin, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

One point urged by the Commercial Standard Insurance Company for a rehearing in the above two cases is that the award in both cases together exceeds the limit of liability fixed in the policy of $10,000 to .any one person in any one accident. The award in favor of Mrs. Miller for $7,500 •was for physical or bodily injuries suffered by her. The award of $3,046.61 in favor of Ernest Emil Miller was for damages to his car and medical and other expenses incurred by him on account of the injury to his wife.

It is clear that the amount awarded Mrs. Miller was a distinct award to her for bodily injuries suffered by her and the amount of damages awarded her belong to her separate estate. The amount awarded the husband was to reimburse the community for damage and expenses incurred on account of the accident. As we said in passing on the motion to transfer the Miller case to the Supreme Court, Miller was suing in a representative capacity to recover damages sustained by the community existing between himself and his wife, and appellate jurisdiction was determined from the fact that the. liability incurred by the community arose out of the same circumstances which gave rise to the wife’s separate claim. This fact does not keep the claims from being separate and distinct; one due the husband as head and master of the community, and the other due the wife as her separate estate.

Finding no error in the decrees entered in these two cases, the application for a rehearing in both cases is refused.
Order entered September 12, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00421-CR

GEVAN KEITH LORING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-55487-N

ORDER

On August 27, 2018, we ordered court reporter Velma Lopez to file a true and correct 

playable copy of State’s Exhibit #1 – labeled “Body Cam.” The following day, Ms. Lopez filed 

a response in which she states she cannot copy and file State’s Exhibit 1 because the DVR that 

was admitted into evidence is empty. In light of this, we VACATE our August 27, 2018 order.

Appellant’s brief is due October 2, 2018.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6464 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of serviceconnection for certain veterans with tinnitus or hearing loss, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2022 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. 

ESPAILLAT, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Ms. NEWMAN, and Mr. COSTA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a presumption of service-connection for certain veterans with 

tinnitus or hearing loss, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hear our Heroes Act 

5 of 2022’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6464 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION FOR 

2 HEARING LOSS AND TINNITUS. 

3 Section 1112 of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(d)(1) For purposes of section 1110 of this title, and 

7 subject to the provisions of section 1113 of this title, diag8 nosed hearing loss, tinnitus, or both of a veteran described 

9 in paragraph (2) shall be considered to have been incurred 

10 in or aggravated by the active military, naval, or air serv11 ice of the veteran, notwithstanding that there is no record 

12 of evidence of such hearing loss or tinnitus, as the case 

13 may be, during the period of such service. 

14 ‘‘(2) A veteran described in this paragraph is a vet15 eran who while on active military, naval, or air service— 

16 ‘‘(A) was assigned to a military occupational 

17 specialty or equivalent described in paragraph (3); 

18 or 

19 ‘‘(B) served in combat. 

20 ‘‘(3) A military occupational specialty or equivalent 

21 referred to in paragraph (2)(A) is a military occupational 

22 specialty or equivalent in which individuals assigned to 

23 such military occupational specialty or equivalent in the 

24 active military, naval, or air service are or were likely to 

25 be exposed to a sufficiently high level of acoustic trauma 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6464 IH

1 as to result in permanent hearing loss, tinnitus, or both, 

2 as determined by the Secretary.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULE FOR RATES FOR DIS4 ABILITY COMPENSATION. 

5 Pursuant to section 1155 of title 38, United States 

6 Code, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall adjust the 

7 schedule of rating disabilities to establish a minimum dis8 ability rating for a veteran who requires a hearing aid be9 cause of a service-connected disability, including pursuant 

10 to section 1112(d) of such title, as amended by section 

11 2. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Concho Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 26, 2010
    /s/  Timothy A. LeachTimothy A. LeachDirector, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Abraham D. Lent, Respondent, v. New Paltz, Highland and Poughkeepsie Traction Company, Appellant.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, and with leave to defendant on payment of such costs and of the costs at Special Term to withdraw demurrer and serve an answer within twenty days. All concurred.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2023

- 32 9 8

_____________________________ C OREY V ASHON M OORE , S R

. ,
Petitioner
,

v.

J AL C HEMICAL C O I NC , d/b/a Teph Seal Auto and L IBERTY I NSURANCE C ORPORATION , Respondents

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction.

Date of Accident: April 15
, 202 2

. January 24, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nicolette E. Tsambis of Smith, Feddeler, Smith P.A., Lakeland , for Petitioner

. Edward C. Duncan III of the Law Office of Ignacio M. Sarmiento, London, KY, for Respondents.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0948 V

UNPUBLISHED

GAVIN B EAGLEY

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 10, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;

Brachial Neuritis

David Charles Richards

, Christensen & J ensen

, P.C.

, Salt Lake C ity

, UT , for P etitioner.

Wei Kit Tai

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 28, 2019

, Gavin Beagley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered brachial neuritis as a resul t of a tetanus

diphtheria

- acellular pertussis ( “ T d ap ” ) vaccine that was administere d to him on July 1,

2017 . Petition at 1

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 8, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent “ [has] review ed the facts of t his case and concluded that [P]etitioner ’ s claim meets the Table criteria for brachial neuritis

. ” Id. at 8 . Respondent

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

further agrees that “ [Petitioner ’ s] brachial neuritis and its sequela, including pain, hand numbness and weakness, persi sted for gre ater than six months

. ” Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master