alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,521,653
<SECURITIES>                                12,512,356
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,109,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                   550,000
<INVENTORY>                                 27,856,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,245,823
<PP&E>                                     120,848,894
<DEPRECIATION>                              47,298,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,087,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,176,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        89,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 132,938,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               159,087,310
<SALES>                                     46,724,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,004,621
<CGS>                                       32,131,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,323,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,680,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,415,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,265,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,265,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 11
                              J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.
                            and Consolidated Subsidiaries

                      Computation of Net Income Per Common Share
                      __________________________________________
                  (Amounts in millions except per common share data)





                                                   39 Weeks Ended
                                ________________________________________________
                                  October 30, 1999           October 31, 1998
                               Shares         Income      Shares         Income
                               ______         ______      ______         ______

     Basic
     _____

     Net income                               $  348                     $  387
     Dividend on Series B ESOP
       convertible preferred
       stock (after-tax)                         (27)                       (28)
                                              _______                    _______
     Adjusted net income                         321                        359

     Weighted average number of
       shares outstanding        259.0                      253.3
                                ______        ______       ______        _______
                                 259.0        $  321        253.3        $  359
                                ======        ======       ======        ======

     Net income per
       common share                           $ 1.24                     $ 1.42
                                              ======                     ======



     Diluted

     Net income                               $  348                     $  387
     Dividend on Series B ESOP
       convertible preferred stock
       (after-tax)                               (27)
     Assumed additional contribution
       to ESOP if preferred stock is
       fully converted                            -                          (1)
                                              _______                     ______
     Adjusted net income                         321                        386

     Weighted average number of
       shares outstanding
       (basic)                   259.0                      253.3
     Dilutive common
       stock equivalents:
         Stock options and other
         dilutive effect           0.5                        2.0
     Convertible
       preferred stock             -                         16.7
                                ______        _______      ______        ______
                                 259.5        $  321        272.0        $  386
                                ======        ======       ======        ======

     Net income per common share              $ 1.24                     $ 1.42
                                               =====                     ======
**EXHIBIT 31(b)****RULE 13a — 14(a)/15d — 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Henry G. Schopfer, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peerless Mfg. Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during theperiod in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) [Not Applicable]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reportingthat occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.                                                        /s/ Henry G. Schopfer, III   Henry G. Schopfer, III   Chief Financial Officer   Date: February 13, 2007
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an 

order denying a motion to disqualify judge, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo 

v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED. 

SA; 

Hardesty 

J. 

Douglas 

cc: Chief Judge, Fifth Judicial District Court 

Hon. Joseph T. Bonaventure, Senior Judge 

Cedric Alan Dial 

Nye County District Attorney 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Nye County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 4/(41D1119
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                          <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    NOV-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         MAY-29-1998
<CASH>                                     1,097
<SECURITIES>                               3,463
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                (506)
<INVENTORY>                                4,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12,319 
<PP&E>                                     1,925
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            12,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,452
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   1,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                 9,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              12,573
<SALES>                                    9,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           9,020
<CGS>                                      6,106 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              8,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (265) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              799
<INCOME-TAX>                                 319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          481
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .35 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .35
        

</TABLE>
#### AYER & LORD TIE COMPANY v. AMITE COUNTY et al.

No. 31738.

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B.

May 20, 1935.

Price, Cassidy & McLain, of McComb, for appellant.

C. T. Gordon, of Liberty, and J. T. Lowrey, of Gloster, for appellees.

ANDERSON, Justice.

There is no disagreement between the parties as to the governing legal principles; they are, that the burden of proof is always upon him who asserts it to show either direct authority of the agent, or prove such facts or circumstances, or such a course of conduct as by implication the presumption would be that the agent was acting within the real or apparent scope of his authority. Moore had large powers. The bid was made, and the contract awarded through him. He received the orders .from the board of supervisors for the lumber and piling, and transmitted them to appellant to be filled. He presented to the board of supervisors for allowance the invoices for the lumber. Appellant made collection through Moore.

The chancellor held that the course of dealing between the parties showed apparent authority in Moore to either file claims in the name of his principal or in his own name, and make collections accordingly. We cannot say from the record that his finding of fact and law was not justified.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2015

p1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2015

147727(84)

DANNY EPPS and JOYCE EPPS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees/

Cross-Appellants,

v SC: 147727

COA: 305731

Wayne CC: 09-018323-NO

4 QUARTERS RESTORATION, L.L.C.,

DENAGLEN CORP., d/b/a MBM CHECK

CASHING, EMERGENCY INSURANCE

SERVICES, and TROY WILLIS,

Defendants-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees,

and

AM ADJUSTING & APPRAISALS, L.L.C.,

MICHAEL N. ANDERSON, JR., HOME

OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, PAULA

MATHEWS, MAXIMUM RESTORATION,

L.L.C., AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE

COMPANY, CHARLES WILLIS, and

COMERICA BANK,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the bill of costs and the motion for taxation of costs in the 

Court of Appeals are DENIED, a public question being involved.
|   | (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:            March 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/       Anthony P. Costa                                             |   |
|                                                          |   | Anthony      P. Costa, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 |   |
|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
| Date:            March 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/       Arthur W. Budich                                             |   |
|                                                          |   | Arthur      W. Budich, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
|                                                          |   |                                                                        |   |
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Kenneth C. Cole, as Public Administrator of the County of Westchester, as Administrator of the Estate of Anthony Venti, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

December 5, 1956.

*Joseph A. Lichtenthal*for petitioner.

*Fink, McNamee & Pavia*for objectant.

*William, C. Sherr*for Lena Massari, attorney in fact for widow,

*1059Samuel Faile, S.

In this administrator’s accounting proceeding the attorneys for the Consul General of Italy have applied for the examination in his own behalf on written interrogatories of a national of Italy residing in or near Borne in order to establish a rejected claim for legal services alleged to have been rendered to decedent. The application is opposed on the ground that the testimony of such party is barred by section 347 of the Civil Practice Act; the proof of claim does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the moving papers fail to establish the necessity of such examination.

The objections to the requested examination are overruled and dismissed. The court determines that such examination is material and necessary and that the proof of claim filed sets forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Section 288 of the Civil Practice Act expressly authorizes a party to an action or proceeding to cause a deposition to be taken in his own behalf. The possibility that on the trial of such action such party may be incompetent to testify to personal transactions with decedent by virtue of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act, does not affect the right to such examination, under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, as to such transactions. *(Lemlich*v. *Lemlich,*266 App. Div. 748.)

Settle order.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended March 31, 2009, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 10, 2009
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Andrew J. Norstrud                              
|                    |  | Andrew J. Norstrud                                  
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
#### In the Matter of the Construction of an Indenture Made by Thomas A. Edison.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 15, 1956.

*Kelley, Drye, Newhall & Maginnes*for Hanover Bank, as trustee, petitioner.

*14William O. Hecht, Jb., J.

Petitioner, in this article 79 proceeding, seeks the construction of a trust indenture and instructions as to whether the trustee thereunder may invest the trust fund in investments of the type prescribed for trustees from time to time by the laws of the State of New York.

By the trust indenture, the grantor transferred to the trustee certain United States Treasury 4%% bonds maturing in 1952. The indenture provided that if the life beneficiary survived the maturity of the securities forming the corpus of the trust, the proceeds were to be reinvested in highest grade securities of like nature, subject to this limitation: *“*It being understood that in no event are the said proceeds to be reinvested in any securities not legally allowed for investment of funds of savings banks under the laws of the State of New York.”

This limitation is not by its terms restricted to securities legally allowed for savings banks at the date of the trust indenture, namely February 14, 1927. Securities legally permitted for savings banks at the time of investment may be acquired. *(Matter of Westerfield,*278 App. Div. 153; *Matter of Hammersley,*152 Misc. 903; cf. *Matter of Sanford,*N. Y. L. J., Feb. 14, 1956, p. 8, col. 3.)

Chapter 705 of the Laws of 1952 of the State of New York added subdivision 26 to section 235 of the Banking Law, permitting savings banks to invest in preferred stocks, guaranteed stocks, common stocks, and shares of investment companies, subject to regulations made by the banking board and to certain formulae based on the surplus fund, undivided profits and total assets of the savings banks making such investment. These formulae do not appear properly to be applicable to a trust fund such as that created by the grantor. In such circumstances, the trustees are permitted to invest in securities authorized for testamentary trustees. *(Matter of Daly,*203 Misc. 851; *Matter of Brown,*1 Misc 2d 234.)

Accordingly, the court construes the trust indenture dated February 14,1927 to mean that so long as such formulae remain in the laws relating to savings bank investments, the limitation on reinvestments to securities legally allowed for investment of funds of savings banks shall not be applicable, but instead the trustee shall be limited to investments authorized for trustees at the time of investment by the laws of the State of New York, including so long as applicable, those authorized in paragraph (m) of subdivision 1 of section 21 of the Personal Property Law, within the limitations therein set forth.

Submit order.
EXHIBIT 35.1

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 30,
2007

CIT Funding
Company, LLC
1 CIT Drive
Livingston, NJ 07039

The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, Fl. 8W
New York, New York 10286

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Re: | Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2006 
  among CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, as Trust, CIT 
  Funding Company, LLC, as Depositor, and CIT Financial USA, Inc., in its individual capacity and as Servicer (the Agreement).

I,
Mark A. Carlson, Senior Vice President  Corporate Treasury of CIT Financial USA, Inc. (the
Servicer), hereby certify that:

A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from March 23, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the Reporting Period) and of the performance
of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.

| |  |                                        |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | CIT
  Financial USA, Inc., as Servicer
| |  |                                        |                                                  
| |  |                                        |                                                  
| |  | By:                                    | /s/ Mark A. Carlson                              
| |  |                                        | Name: Mark A. Carlson                            
| |  |                                        | Title: Senior Vice President  Corporate Treasury

---