alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6502 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for any system of records on religious 

accommodations with respect to any COVID–19 vaccination requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2022 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself and Mrs. HINSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for any system of 

records on religious accommodations with respect to any 

COVID–19 vaccination requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Freedom 

5 Over Mandates Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR RECORDING RELIGIOUS 

7 ACCOMMODATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ANY 

8 COVID–19 VACCINATION REQUIREMENT. 

9 No Federal funds may be used to establish, operate, 

10 maintain, or support any system of records on religious 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6502 IH

1 accommodations requested by, or granted to, an employee, 

2 detailee, contractor, consultant, intern, applicant, volun3 teer, or any other person with respect to any COVID–19 

4 vaccination requirement. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Clyde H. ELZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

March 5, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I,  Maarten  Reidel,  Chief  Financial Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that:

(1)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended  September  30,  2002  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of  Section  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November  14,  2002


                                              /s/  Maarten  Reidel
                                              -------------------------
                                              Maarten  Reidel
                                              Chief  Financial  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW161815]


Wyoming: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and 
Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from Retamco Operating Inc. for competitive 
oil and gas lease WYW161815 for land in Carbon County, Wyoming. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or 
fraction thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to 
reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. 
The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease 
as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act 
of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing 
to reinstate lease WYW161815 effective April 1, 2008, under the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting 
the lands.

Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. E8-19964 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6750 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to certain 

security registration thresholds, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself and Mr. DONALDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect 

to certain security registration thresholds, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘More Accurate Metrics 

5 in Securities Law Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SECURITY REGISTRATION THRESHOLDS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 12(g)(1)(A) of the Securi8 ties Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(g)(1)(A)) is 

9 amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6750 IH

1 ‘‘(A) within 120 days after the last day of its 

2 first fiscal year ended on which the issuer has— 

3 ‘‘(i) total assets exceeding $15,000,000; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(ii) either— 

6 ‘‘(I) a class of equity security (other 

7 than an exempted security) held of record 

8 by greater than a number of beneficial 

9 owners determined by the Commission by 

10 rule; or 

11 ‘‘(II) market capitalization exceeding 

12 an amount determined by the Commission 

13 by rule, and’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 180 

16 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit      35.2**

**SERVICER      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**

|   | First              Horizon              Home Loan Corporation |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                          |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   | By:                                                           | /s/              Kim Yowell |
|   | Date:                3/26/07                                  |
|   | Name:                Kim Yowell                               |
|   | Title:                SVP Servicing Manager                   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   | First                Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.        |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   | By:                                                      | /s/                Terry L. McCoy |
|   | Date:                3/26/07                                  |
|   | Name:                Terry L. McCoy                           |
|   | Title:                Vice President                          |
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Barry J. Feld, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of PCA International, Inc. (the “Registrant”),certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PCAInternational, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:    June 16, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               34,755
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        52,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          25,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    121,041
<PP&E>                                            4,597,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,534,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      185,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,155,974
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                            159,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,130,533)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        185,161
<SALES>                                             198,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    208,313
<CGS>                                               184,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       184,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    144,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   16,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (135,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (135,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (135,698)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.09)


</TABLE>
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
(Unaudited; dollars in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    September 30,         December 31,
                                                                        1998                 1997
                                                                        ----                 ----

<S>                                                                 <C>                    <C> 
Short-term debt                                                     $       83.1                 91.4
Current portion of long-term debt                                           61.5                 54.8
Long-term debt                                                             815.4                857.1
                                                                      ----------           ----------
   Total debt                                                              960.0              1,003.3
Minority interests in subsidiaries                                          96.7                113.3
Common shareholders' equity                                              2,624.5              2,510.4
                                                                      ----------           ----------
   Total capitalization                                             $    3,681.2              3,627.0
                                                                      ==========           ==========

Ratio of total debt to total
 capitalization                                                            26.1%                27.7%
                                                                      ==========           ==========
</TABLE>
#### INDUSTRIAL LOAN *&*INVESTMENT CO. v. PRICE (PRICE, Garnishee).

No. 6926.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

May 27, 1946.

Shapiro & Shapiro, of Alexandria, for appellant.

John R. Hunter & Son, of Alexandria, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff caused issuance of a writ of fi. fa. on judgment rendered in its favor by the City Court, Alexandria Ward, of the Parish of Rapides and against Buford T. Price, and contemporaneously therewith Plarold Price, doing business as Auto Electric Service, was made garnishee. He was cited as such, and the usual interrogatories were propounded to and served on him. He did not answer, however, until the second day after the expiration of the time allowed for doing so. On the day the garnishee answered, plaintiff provoked the issuance of a rule on the garnishee to show cause why his answer should not be set aside as having been filed too late, and why judgment pro confesso against him should not be signed by the court. After trial the relief sought through the rule, in all respects, was denied'and the rule dismissed.

Plaintiff appealed from judgment in keeping with the ruling of the court.

While plaintiff’s counsel was arguing the case it occurred to members of the court that the judgment appealed from was not definitive in character, but interlocutory. The record facts elicited from counsel convinced the court that the judgment was not definitive, and, for this reason, was not subject to he appealed from. Further argument in the case was stopped.

It is obvious to us that after the relief sought by the rule was denied, plaintiff’s legal and logical course was to proceed to traverse the garnishee’s answers as being untrue if it desired to further prose*230cute the matter. If its demand on this score had been denied, plaintiff would have had a right of appeal to this court as the judgment on the motion to traverse would have been definitive because it would have the effect of adjudging finally the issue raised by the motion. In such case, plaintiff could have urged its complaint against, and submitted for decision, the City Court’s ruling on the rule as the appeal would have brought up for review that ruling.

Judgments are either interlocutory or final. Interlocutory judgments do not decide on the merits. They are pronounced on preliminary matters in the course of the proceedings. Definitive or final judgments are such as decide all the points of controversy between the parties. Such judgments have the force of res ju-dicata. Code of Practice, Articles 537, 538 and 539.

For the reasons herein assigned, the appeal in this case is hereby dismissed at appellant’s cost.
Description of the 2005 Annual Incentive Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 NVR, Inc. 
 Summary of the 2005 Annual Incentive Compensation Program 
  
 The following is a description of NVR, Inc.’s (“NVR”) 2005 annual incentive compensation program (the “Bonus Program”). The Bonus Program is not set forth in a formal written document, and
therefore NVR is providing this description of the program. 
  
 Virtually all of NVR’s management employees participate in the Bonus Program, including all of NVR’s executive officers. Under the Bonus Program, each executive officer has a maximum potential payout limited to 100% of his base
salary. The annual incentive award is based on actual financial results compared to the business plan approved by NVR’s Board of Directors. At the beginning of each year, financial targets that are tied to NVR’s annual business plan are
established by NVR’s Compensation Committee. The financial target for corporate executives is based on NVR, Inc.’s consolidated pre-tax profit (before consolidated annual incentive expense but after all other charges). The financial
targets used for the mortgage banking operation are pre-tax profit (before annual incentive expense and certain corporate cost allocations) and return on invested capital. The financial targets used for the homebuilding operation are pre-tax profit
(before annual incentive expense, but after a charge for the cost of capital) and return on assets. 
  
 An executive officer begins to earn the incentive award once the financial targets are at least 70% attained. The full amount of the incentive award is
earned ratably from 70% up to 100% of the financial target attainment. The executive officers can earn no more than 100% of their base salary as an incentive award, which is earned once 100% of the financial targets are attained. Thus, attainment of
greater than 100% of the financial target has no impact on the amount of the incentive award earned.
JULIAN FRANK KALIVODA

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1497

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed January 4, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. William F. Stone , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant; Julian Frank Kalivoda, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                             P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joseph A. Molino, Jr.

Joseph A. Molino, Jr.
Principal Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT



(401(K) PLAN)





AGREEMENT, made this March 1, 2002, by and between Jerry Kieliszak (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"), and Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation with its principal offices at 5 Hub Drive, Melville, New York 11747.



WHEREAS, the Trustee has agreed to provide his service to the Chyron Corp. 401(K) Plan, (the "Plan") provided that Chyron Corporation (the "Company") agrees to indemnify and hold it harmless for certain actions or inactions as Trustee; and



WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee for certain actions or inactions as Trustee.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



1.	To the maximum extent permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and by other applicable Federal or state law, the Trustee shall not be liable for (either jointly or severally), and the Company shall indemnify the Trustee against, and agree to hold the Trustee harmless from, any and all liabilities and claims (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against such liabilities and claims) against the Trustee arising from any action or inaction of the Trustee with respect to the Plan, unless such liability or expense results from grossly negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by the Trustee.  The foregoing indemnification also shall apply to all liabilities and claims against the Trustee arising from any breach of fiduciary responsibility by fiduciaries other than Trustee, unless the Trustee participates knowingly in such breach, or has actual knowledge of such breach and fails to take reasonable remedial action to remedy such breach.  The Trustee shall be entitled to collect on the Company's indemnity under this Agreement only from the Company and shall not be entitled to payment directly or indirectly from the Plan.



2.	The Trustee shall give the Company prompt written notice of any asserted or potential claim by any party with respect to which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.  The Company shall have the right to defend and control the nature of any action or defense to any such claim or demand which may be asserted against the Trustee for which the Trustee reasonably expects to assert a claim for indemnification.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and executed this Agreement, effective March 1, 2002.



| |     | CHYRON CORPORATION          
| | --- | ----------------------------
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| | By: | /s/ Robert S. Matlin        
| |     | Name: Robert S. Matlin, Esq.
| |     | Title:   Secretary          
| |     |                             
| |     |                             
| |     | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak         
| |     | Name: Jerry Kieliszak       
| |     |