alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ending April 29, 2006, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gregory J. Young, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# (1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Gregory J. Young                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory  J. Young                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |
| May 14, 2008                 |

 

1

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 6668** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

P etitioner

- Appellee ,

v.

RAPHAEL MENDEZ , Respondent

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 5:91

- hc

- 00350

- BR )

Submitted : June 26 , 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Robert Jack Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; David T. Huband, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina; Mi chael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Raphael Mendez appeals the district court ’ s order s
denying his motion for free copies of his Annual Supervision
Reports and denying his motion for a transfer. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Mendez , No. 5:91

- hc

- 00350

- BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
133592 & (46) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 133592 COA: 267117 Wayne CC: 05-007434-01 LINDELL BROWN, a/k/a ANTHONY MARK, a/k/a ARTHUR RAGLANO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for admission pro hac vice of David Z. Chesnoff is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the Marc h 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                          37,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,044
<INVENTORY>                                    280,669
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,656
<PP&E>                                         286,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 944,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          252,854
<BONDS>                                        303,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           201
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   944,302
<SALES>                                      1,802,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,833,623
<CGS>                                        1,396,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,396,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($3.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($3.91)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the Annual Report of Royal Equine, Inc; (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich
      ,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 31, 2008





/s/
                Demitro MarianovichDemitro
                Marianovich ,Chief
                Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-138175and No. 333-143509 on Form S-8 of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (theCompany) of our reports dated March 12, 2008, with respect to theconsolidated statements of condition of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. andsubsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-Kof Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.

 

Our report dated March 12,2008 on the consolidated statements of condition of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, refersto the Company’s adoption of FASB Statement No. 158, *Employers’Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Post Retirement Plans*,effective December 31, 2006.

 

(signed) KPMG LLP

Philadelphia,Pennsylvania

March 12, 2008

 

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00230-CV 

IN RE DAVECO INDUSTRIES, INC., 

ADA B. HELTERBRAND, 

HELTERBRAND FAMILY

TRUST, AND HELTERBRAND 

FAMILY, L.P.

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 153-266829-13

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 1, 2014

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6695 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6695

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the equitable 
  restoration of eligibility for provision of Department of Veterans 
   Affairs memorial headstones and markers for eligible spouses and 
     dependent children of veterans whose remains are unavailable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2022

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the equitable 
  restoration of eligibility for provision of Department of Veterans 
   Affairs memorial headstones and markers for eligible spouses and 
     dependent children of veterans whose remains are unavailable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF VETERANS' SPOUSES AND DEPENDENT CHILDREN 
              WHOSE REMAINS ARE UNAVAILABLE FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS MEMORIAL HEADSTONES AND MARKERS.

    Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``An individual who 
        dies on or after November 11, 1998, who is the'' and inserting 
        ``The''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``An individual who 
        dies on or after November 11, 1998, who is an'' and inserting 
        ``An''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF 

KARLON KIDDER, BAR NO. 11622. 

No. 68964 

ALE 

JAN 0 71 

Ipktip:( 

i

CLERK „IP P._ . „., t.,K.,,t--;....• L L - n , 

CE-HE 'EP 

ORDER APPROVING CONDITIONAL GUILTY PLEA AGREEMENT 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

This is an automatic review of a Northern Nevada 

Disciplinary Board hearing panel's recommendation that this court 

approve, pursuant to SCR 113, a conditional guilty plea agreement in 

exchange for a stated form of discipline for attorney Karlon Kidder. Under 

the agreement, Kidder admitted to violations of RPC 1.5 (fees), RPC 1.7 

(conflict of interest: current clients), RPC 3.3 (candor toward the tribunal), 

RPC 3.4 (fairness to opposing party and counsel), RPC 5.3 (responsibilities 

regarding nonlawyer assistants), RPC 5.5 (unauthorized practice of law), 

and RPC 8.4 (misconduct). 

The agreement provides for a one-year suspension with the 

last nine months stayed, subject to the following conditions: (1) Kidder 

shall execute and comply with the mentoring agreement, which shall be in 

effect for two years; and (2) he shall not make any appearance in any 

federal court for six months after approval of the suspension by the 

Nevada Supreme Court. Further, Kidder shall pay $750 to the State Bar 

for the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. 

Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the guilty 

plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). We hereby impose a 

one-year suspension with the last nine months of the suspension stayed. 

(0) 1947A e )Lo - 035.27)-1 
Douglas 

"Etta 

Additionally, Kidder must comply with all of the conditions in the plea 

agreement, as outlined above. Kidder and the State Bar shall comply with 

the applicable provisions of SCR 121.1 and SCR 115 arid 116, if necessary. 

It is so ORDERED. 

DOUGLAS and SAITTA, JJ., dissenting: 

We would reject the conditional guilty plea agreement because 

the agreed-upon discipline is not sufficient. 

, J. 

cc: Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Panel 

C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada 

The Kidder Law Group, Ltd. 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I907A 

7.tatiq kratit!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from the Liquidating Trust's statement of
     net assets in liquidation at June 30, 1997 and the
     Liquidating Trust's statement of changes in net
     assets in liquidation for the three months ended
     June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
     reference to such financial statements.

     </LEGEND>
     <MULTIPLIER>   1,000
              
     <S>                                <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997 
     <PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997 
     <CASH>                                  137,373 
     <SECURITIES>                            141,945 
     <RECEIVABLES>                                 0 
     <ALLOWANCES>                                  0 
     <INVENTORY>                                   0 
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
     <PP&E>                                        0 
     <DEPRECIATION>                                0 
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                          279,318 
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    40,386 
     <BONDS>                                       0 
     <COMMON>                                      0 
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0 
     <PREFERRED>                                   0 
     <OTHER-SE>                              238,932 
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            279,318 
     <SALES>                                       0 
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                          4,233 
     <CGS>                                         0 
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                             8,686 
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0 
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                              0 
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0 
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                          15,603 
     <INCOME-TAX>                                  0 
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                      15,603 
     <DISCONTINUED>                                0 
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                               0 
     <CHANGES>                                     0 
     <NET-INCOME>                             15,603 
     <EPS-PRIMARY>                               .30 
     <EPS-DILUTED>                               .30 
        

</TABLE>
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20046 Conference Calendar

__________________ RALPH WESLEY ROGERS, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus RICHARD TRINCI ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-93-0068
- - - - - - - - - - June 28, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ralph Wesley Rogers, Sr., has not shown that the change in lifting restriction was a wanton action that Dr. Berry knew or should have known would cause a substantial risk to his health. See Farmer v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1981 (1994). With respect to the claim of retaliation, it is well settled that an inmate may not be retaliated against because he exercises his right to access to the courts. Gibbs v. King , 779 F.2d 1040, 1046 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 476 U.S. 1117 (1986). However, ifNo. 95-20046 -2- the conduct alleged to constitute retaliation does not, by itself, raise the inference that such conduct was retaliatory, the assertion of the claim itself without supporting facts is insufficient. Whittington v. Lynaugh , 842 F.2d 818, 819 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 840 (1988). Rogers has not sufficiently alleged deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs resulting from his medical classification and resultant work assignment; therefore he has not alleged conduct that would raise an inference of retaliatory conduct. Other than his bare assertions, Rogers provided no facts to suggest that his medical treatment and work assignments were in any way connected to his legal activities. AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6614 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4744 Grand River Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Louise 

McCauley Parks Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2022 

Ms. TLAIB introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4744 Grand River Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Louise McCauley Parks Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROSA LOUISE MCCAULEY PARKS POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 4744 Grand River Avenue in De7 troit, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Rosa Louise McCauley Parks Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6614 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rosa Louise McCauley 

5 Parks Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**

**First      Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-AA3**

|   |   | First Horizon Home Loan              Corporation      |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                       |
|   |   | By: /s/ Kim              Yowell                       |
|   |   | Name: Kim Yowell                                           |
|   |   | Date: 03/01/07                                   |
|   |   | Title: SVP, Servicing              Manager            |
|   |   |                                                       |
|   |   | First Tennessee Mortgage Services,              Inc.  |
|   |   |                                                       |
|   |   | By: /s/ Terry              L. McCoy___                |
|   |   | Date: 03/01/07                                   |
|   |   | Name: Terry L. McCoy                                  |
|   |   | Title: Vice              President               |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6625 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6625

  To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from issuing 
 guidance intended to restrict access to COVID-19 monoclonal antibody 
                    therapies and other treatments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2022

    Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. 
  Garbarino, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. 
    Lamborn, Mrs. Cammack, Mr. Bost, and Ms. Tenney) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from issuing 
 guidance intended to restrict access to COVID-19 monoclonal antibody 
                    therapies and other treatments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Access to Therapeutics Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RESTRICTIONS ON DIRECT ACCESS TO COVID-19 
              MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY THERAPIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services may not issue, implement, or 
continue in effect any policy or guidance intended to base any 
determination on whether an individual may access COVID-19 monoclonal 
antibody therapies and other COVID-19 treatments on the race or 
ethnicity of such individual.
    (b) Penalties.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall be 
held personally liable for the death of any individual who is denied 
access to COVID-19 monoclonal antibody therapies and other treatments 
pursuant to any policy or guidance prohibited under subsection (a).

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING TO HOSPITALS AND HEALTH CARE 
              PROVIDERS WHO RESTRICT ACCESS TO COVID-19 MONOCLONAL 
              ANTIBODY THERAPIES.

    No Federal funds may be disbursed to any hospital or other health 
care provider that has in effect a policy that restricts access by 
individuals to COVID-19 monoclonal antibody therapies and other COVID-
19 treatments based on the race or ethnicity of such individuals.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Saunders the Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

(i)             the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   March 10, 2011              |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/   John Saunders                      |   |
| John   Saunders, Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard D. Moss, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Hanesbrands Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.











/s/ Richard D. MossRichard D. MossChief Financial Officer


Date: February 23, 2017