alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Josephine Jones, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Wright, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*416 Pleasant Avenue Holding Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 6, 1949.

*Snitow & Snitow*for plaintiff.

*Van Orman & Harmon*for defendant.

Ernest E. L. Hammer, J.

The complaint in this action states two causes (1) to recover damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff’s intestate and (2) to recover for his wrongful death. The dismissal of the complaint is- sought on the ground that the Statute of Limitations has run as to both causes. It appears that the injury complained of occurred on August 26, 1944 and that the intestate died on January 30, 1946. Letters of administration issued on July 9, 1948. The action was instituted on July 20,1948. The complaint alleges that plaintiff’s intestate became incompetent as a result of the injuries received. The date when he became incompetent is not set forth nor is there any allega*480tion of formal adjudication or of the appointment of any committee.

The complaint is so drawn that the first cause may be one in negligence, subject to the three-year statute or one for violation of a statutory duty, subject to the six-year statute. While the statute may have run if the cause lies in negligence proper it is clear that it has not run if the cause is in the second category. In such circumstances the complaint will not be dismissed on motion but defendant may plead the applicable Statute of Limitations and renew the motion at the trial. The second cause is not barred since less than two years have elapsed since the issuance of letters of administration *(Crapo*v. *City of Syracuse,*183 N. Y. 395).

The motion is accordingly denied in all respects.
#### Benoit Wasserman, Respondent, v. Edith S. Jacobs, Appellant, Impleaded with Margaret B. Lawrence and Others.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Laughlin and Clarke, JJ., dissented.
Statement of
Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee. I, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon
  (formerly   The   Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the Trustee), state: (a) A review of the Trustees
activities for the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the Reporting
Period) and of the Trustees performance under the Standard Terms for Trust
Agreements dated November 5, 2004 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the
Depositor) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary (the Securities
Intermediary), in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor,
the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary (as amended in each such case, the Trust
Agreement), has been made under my supervision. (b)  To the best of my knowledge and
based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust
Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for PPLUS Trust Series
LTD-1 Trust Certificates. The Bank of New York Mellon  
        (formerly The Bank of New York), as  TrusteeDate:
March 4, 2013
      /s/ James W. P. Hall
        James W. P. Hall
                                                 Vice President
#### Eleanor H. Fishbach, Plaintiff, *v.*Hyman I. Fishbach, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 16, 1957.

*Sidney I. Liebowits*for plaintiff.

No appearance for defendant.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for an order to direct the entry of a judgment for the amount of arrears in alimony. Defendant is in default of payments of alimony and counsel fees awarded by a matrimonial judgment of this court. In pursuance of a prior application a money judgment had been entered for arrears up to July 23, 1956; the instant motion requests judgment to October 22, 1956.

This motion is bottomed upon a mere notice, served by mail addressed to defendant in Florida. Section 1171-b of the Civil Practice Act requires that “ The application for such order shall be upon such notice to the husband * * * as the court may direct.” This language would seem to indicate that an order to show cause is required in which the court would be able to direct the type of notice to be given. The prior motion was also brought on by notice of motion. However, there, defendant appeared and contested. Here, there has been no personal service upon or appearance by defendant.

Accordingly, the motion is denied, without prejudice to renewal upon due compliance with section 1171-b *(supra).*
#### E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Plaintiff, *v.*Leo Wallach, Doing Business as Bay Tire Co., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

December 12, 1956.

*Cravath, Swaine & Moore*for plaintiff.

*Louis Weiser*for defendant.

A. David Benjamin, J.

On the testimony offered before me at the hearing on November 29, 1956, I find that the defendant in the several instances claimed has willfully and deliberately violated the order of this court entered November 15, 1955 granting a preliminary injunction herein (General Business Law, § 369-a *et seq.;*Fair Trade Law).

His conduct in so violating. the temporary restraining order was calculated to impair, impede, defeat and prejudice the rights of the plaintiff and to flout the mandate of this court. He is therefore adjudged guilty of contempt of court (Judiciary Law, § 753, subd. A, pars. 1, 2, 3).

The plaintiff has shown no pecuniary loss arising from the offenses. The defendant is now contrite. He is aware of the seriousness of his offenses; he will not suffer them to be repeated and pleads for leniency. He conducts a small neighborhood retail business. His wife is hospitalized and he is the sole support of his young daughter and his aged mother. The court in assessing punishment herein is not unmindful of defendant’s circumstances. He is fined the sum of $500. Motion granted. Submit order accordingly.
Filed pursuant to
                                                                  Rule 424(b)(2)
                                                      Registration No. 33-59791


                                    CITICORP
                               U.S. $7,000,000,000
                    Global Medium-Term Senior Notes, Series C
                               U.S. $1,000,000,000
                   Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series C
                  Due From 9 Months to 60 Years From Date of Issue

Pricing  Supplement,  dated  January 4, 1996 (To  Prospectus  Supplement,  dated
      August 7, 1995; to Prospectus, dated August 7, 1995)

                              DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

      The terms of the Subordinated  Notes set forth in this Pricing  Supplement
supplement  and modify,  to the extent  applicable,  the  description of general
terms and provisions of Citicorp's Global Medium-Term Subordinated Notes, Series
C,  set  forth  in  the  accompanying   Prospectus  and  Prospectus  Supplement.
Capitalized  terms not defined  herein shall have the meanings  assigned to such
terms in the accompanying Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement.


SUMMARY OF TERMS:

Title of Notes:               6.00% Subordinated Notes Due January 9, 2003
                              (the "Notes").
Aggregate
Principal Amount:             $10,000,000.00.

Price to Public:              100.00%

Issue Date:                   January 9, 1996.

Stated Maturity:              January 9, 2003.

Interest Rate:                6.00% per annum.

Interest Payment Dates:       Semi-annually on the 9th day of each January and
                              July, commencing July 9, 1996, and at Stated
                              Maturity.

Regular Record Dates:         The first day of the month in which each Interest
                              Payment Date occurs.

Sinking Fund:                 None.

Redemption:                   The Notes are not subject to redemption.

Selling Agent:                Merrill Lynch & Co.

Agent's Commission:           .451%.

CUSIP Number:                 17303 MEM 7.
214 La. 501

#### STATE v. ELKINS.

No. 39069.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1948.

Harvey G. Fields, of Farmerville, for defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E.. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Truett L. Scarborough, Dist. Atty., of Ruston, for appellee.

McCALEB, Justice.

Defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for unlawfully engaging, in the business of handling and storing in*151toxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Eleven bills of exception were reserved by him during the trial. One of the bills is admittedly well founded. Hence, it is unnecessary to notice the rest as defendant is entitled to a new trial.

The bill was taken to the judge’s action in permitting the arresting officer to state, ■over timely objection, “We had a tip on Roy Elkins selling on that road * * This declaration was clearly hearsay and ■should have been excluded under our rulings in State v. Kimble, 214 La. 58, 36 So. 2d 637 and State v. Lowery, La.Sup., 38 So.2d 77. Albeit, the state confesses the ■error and concedes that defendant should have a new trial.

The conviction and sentence appealed from are reversed and set aside and the case is remanded to the district court for .a new trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11409 and #11410]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated 08/26/2008.

*Incident:*                         Tropical Storm Fay.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/18/2008 and continuing.                    

*Effective Date:*                         08/26/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/27/2008.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/26/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of FLORIDA , dated 08/26/2008 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Hendry, Okeechobee, Saint Lucie, Volusia.                

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Broward, Charlotte, Collier, Flagler, Glades, Highlands, Lake, Lee, Marion, Martin, Palm Beach, Polk, Putnam.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-20449 Filed 9-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00031

- CR

Aaron Anthony Torres

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 19th District Court of McLennan County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012

- 1062

- C1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 1 , 2015
Exhibit 32.1
– Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





I, Wm. Milton Cox, Chief Executive
Officer of Gulf Western Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended August 31, 2007 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of1934
and





(2)  the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: April 21,
2008





/s/ Wm. Milton
      CoxChairman and Chief Executive
      Office(principal executive
      officer)
---

Exhibit 99.9

Robert E. Blackstone, Ph.D

September 28, 2006

|Re: | Energy Metals Corporation           
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | Annual Information Form and Form 40F

I am the author of the Technical Report on the Palangana and
Hobson Uranium In-Situ Leach Project Duval and Karnes Counties, Texas, dated
November 10, 2005 (the Report) referred to in the Annual Information Form and
Form 40F of Energy Metals Corporation. dated September 28, 2006 (the "AIF and
40F"). I consent to being named in both the AIF and 40F and to the use of the
Report in both the AIF and 40F.

I have read both the AIF and 40F and confirm that:

| | (a) | I have no reason to believe that there are any
      misrepresentations in the information contained in both the AIF and 40F
      derived from the Report or that is within my knowledge as a result of the
      investigations and enquiries made by me in connection with the preparation
      of the Report; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (b) | the section in the AIF headed Description of Business
      fairly and accurately summarizes the Report and omits no material
      information contained in the Report.                                                                                                                                            

Yours truly,

Per: /s/ Robert E. Blackstone, Ph.D

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with this quarterly  report of Possis  Medical,  Inc. on Form
10Q for the  period  ended  April  30,  2003 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof ("the  Report"),  I, Robert G. Dutcher,
Chief Executive Officer of Possis Medical, Inc., certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,
that:

     1. The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in this  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Possis
Medical, Inc.




June 16, 2003                      /s/
                              Robert G. Dutcher
                              Chairman, President and
                              Chief Executive Officer


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Possis  Medical,  Inc. and will be retained by Possis  Medical,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.

<PAGE>


     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with this quarterly  report of Possis  Medical,  Inc. on Form
10Q for the  period  ended  April  30,  2003 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),  I, Eapen Chacko,  Chief
Financial  Officer  of Possis  Medical,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1. The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The  information  contained  in this  report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Possis
Medical, Inc.




June 16, 2003                      /s/
                              Eapen Chacko
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              Vice President of Finance


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Possis  Medical,  Inc. and will be retained by Possis  Medical,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
Summary of 2005 Base Salaries for 2004 Named Executive Officers



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
  
 Summary of 2005 Base Salaries for 2004 Named Executive Officers 
  
 Fiscal 2005 base salaries for the four executive officers named in the 2004 proxy statement
who remain employed by the Company (the “Executives”) are as follows: 
  
 David W. Cole, $360,600 
  
 Brian V. Turner, $270,400 
  
 Richard P. Stillman, $294,700; and 
  
 Alexander C. Camara, $174,700
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6868 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6868

  To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for financial 
 assistance to fund certain cybersecurity and infrastructure security 
    education and training programs and initiatives, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2022

 Mr. Garbarino (for himself, Mr. Katko, and Ms. Titus) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for financial 
 assistance to fund certain cybersecurity and infrastructure security 
    education and training programs and initiatives, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cybersecurity Grants for Schools Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION SUPPORT.

    Section 2220 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 665f) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Grants and Cooperative Agreements.--The Director may award 
financial assistance in the form of grants or cooperative agreements to 
States, local governments, institutions of higher education (as such 
term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1001)), nonprofit organizations, and other non-Federal entities 
as determined appropriate by the Director for the purpose of funding 
cybersecurity and infrastructure security education and training 
programs and initiatives to--
            ``(1) carry out the purposes of CETAP; and
            ``(2) enhance CETAP to address the national shortfall of 
        cybersecurity professionals.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robert G. Dutcher, Chief
Executive Officer of Possis Medical, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.




Date: December 7, 2007           By:  /s/ Robert G. Dutcher
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           ROBERT G. DUTCHER
                           Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       24