alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM
THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET, AND CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,035
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         89
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             675
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           712
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      80
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,591
<COMMON>                                         1,073
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                380
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,189
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  82
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        1
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,833
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,591
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          669
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                38
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         581
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             97
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   9
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            19
<NET-INCOME>                                        40
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       39
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            31

<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47

        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6632 

To except quotations of fixed-income securities from certain regulatory 

requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2022 

Mr. KUSTOFF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To except quotations of fixed-income securities from certain 

regulatory requirements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) On September 16, 2020, the Securities and 

6 Exchange Commission adopted a final rule amend7 ing Rule 15c2–11 under the Securities Exchange 

8 Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) which addresses 

9 disclosures in the OTC markets and imposes reVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:32 Feb 10, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6632.IH H6632

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6632 IH

1 quirements upon broker-dealers who publish 

2 quotations in such markets. 

3 (2) Rule 15c2–11 was promulgated in 1971, 

4 and has generally been understood to apply to OTC 

5 equity markets since that time. 

6 (3) The amendments to Rule 15c2–11 were 

7 based on the economic analysis of OTC equity mar8 kets. 

9 (4) The fixed-income markets are different in 

10 structure and function than OTC equity markets. 

11 (5) The fixed-income markets are critical to the 

12 ability of thousands of corporations’ ability to raise 

13 capital, and millions of consumers to obtain credit. 

14 (6) On December 16, 2021, the Securities and 

15 Exchange Commission issued a No-Action Letter 

16 purporting to apply Rule 15c2–11 to fixed-income 

17 markets in a manner that made significant changes 

18 to long-standing regulatory requirements, without a 

19 rulemaking process, without analysis of the costs 

20 and benefits of the action, and without regard for 

21 the input of the public. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6632 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION RELATING TO QUOTATIONS OF FIXED2 INCOME SECURITIES. 

3 Section 240.15c2–11 of title 17, Code of Federal 

4 Regulations, shall not apply with respect to quotations of 

5 fixed-income securities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  February 9, 2005

  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi
Form of Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
 Date 
  
 Name 
 Address 
 City State 
  
 Dear
                    : 
  
 Pursuant to the terms and conditions of Adolor Corporation’s 2003 Stock Based Incentive Compensation Plan or Adolor’s 1994 Amended and Restated
Equity Compensation Plan (the ‘Plan’), you have been granted an Option to purchase              shares (the ‘Option’) of common stock as outlined below. Because
of the IRS limitation of $100,000 per year on Incentive Stock Options, the option must be segmented into              shares covered by an Incentive Stock Option and
             shares covered by a Non-Qualified Stock Option. Together these options vest
                     effective as of date of grant. 
  

							
	 Granted to:
	  	 ___________
	  	 	  	 
	 	  	 SS #                  
	  	 	  	 
				
	 Grant Date:
	  	 ___________
	  	 	  	 
			
	 Options Granted:
	  	 ________Incentive Stock Options
	  	 
	 Option Price per Share:
	  	 $            
	  	 Total Cost to Exercise:
	  	 $            

	 Expiration Date:
	  	 _________
	  	 	  	 
			
	 Options Granted:
	  	 _________Non-Qualified Stock Options
	  	 
	 Option Price per Share:
	  	 $            
	  	 Total Cost to Exercise:
	  	 $            

	 Expiration Date:
	  	 ___________
	  	 	  	 

  
 Michael R. Dougherty 
 Chief Operating Officer 
  
 I hereby acknowledge receipt of the Stock Option granted on the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Option Agreement. I also acknowledge receipt of copies
of the Plan, its Summary Description and the Company’s latest annual report (SEC Form 10-K), and acknowledge and agree that I am bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Option Agreement with respect to my option. 
  

							
	 Signature:
	 	  

	  	Date
189 La. 285

#### STATE v. DESOTO SECURITIES CO., Inc.

No. 33889.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 7, 1938.

S. M. Atkinson, of Mannsfield, for appellant.

Lee & Lee, of Shreveport, for appellee.

FOURNET, Justice.

The State of Louisiana proceeded by rule against the DeSoto Securities Company to recover a license or occupation tax for the years 1933 and 1934, plus statutory penalties, and attorney’s fees for conducting the business of purchasing, selling, trading in, or lending on notes secured by chattel mortgage, vendor’s, contractor’s, mechanic’s, or other statutory liens, or otherwise, under the provisions of section 301 of Act No. 190 of 1932.

The defendant resisted the rule on the ground that it had been in the process of liquidating its affairs since a time prior to the year 1933, and that during the years 1933 and 1934 and up to the time of filing its answer it had not been engaged in the alleged business and its actions during that time had been restricted solely to collecting obligations due it arising prior to the year 1933.

The case was submitted upon an admitted statement of facts substantially embracing the facts asserted in the defendant’s answer. The trial judge rejected the State’s demand, and it has appealed.

*317It is argued, without submission of authorities in support thereof, by counsel for the State ' that, while it was agreed that said defendant was in a state of liquidation, it appears from the record that the defendant was not being liquidated by “Court appointed liquidators, but through itself in its private capacity, and there is no reason why it should not pay the license tax sued on, penalties, *costs*and attorney’s fees.”

The authority under which the license tax is levied against the .business allegedly conducted by the defendant is under section 30 of Act No. 190 of 1932, which provides: “That there is hereby levied an annual license tax 1 upon each person, firm, corporation or association of persons *engaged in the business*of purchasing, selling, trading in or lending on notes secured by chattel mortgage, vendor’s, contractor’s, mechanic’s or other statutory liens.” (Italics ours.)

A mere reading of the section conclusively shows that it was the intention of the Legislature to tax only those *engaged in the business*named but not those en- • gaged in the liquidation of such a business. The fact that the defendant is liquidating its own affairs instead of through the aid of the court, in our opinion, is immaterial.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

HIGGINS, J., absent.
#### Adria Guy, Respondent, *v.*Mary Furman, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 12, 1956.

*David L. Minkoff*for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This proceeding should have been dismissed for failure to give the notice required by section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations (see *Frankel*v. *Rost,*272 App. Div. 334). But, in any event, such dismissal was surely required upon tenant’s cross motion to set aside the final order in landlord’s favor, when uncontradicted documentary proof was presented that landlord had accepted rent between the time of said notice and the commencement of the proceeding. Subdivision 8 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act, authorizing landlord to accept rent without prejudice to a holdover proceeding, applies only after it has been commenced.

The final order and order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur: Hofstadter, Eder and Hecht, Jr., JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoOum  Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ending  June 30, 2016 , I, William Westbrook, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  October 5, 2016

SoOum Corp.



By:   /s/ William Westbrook

William Westbrook
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





________________








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT,


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934








DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  November 7, 2012








CHYRON CORPORATION


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








New York
01-09014
11-2117385(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)








5 Hub DriveMelville, New York
11747(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)








Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000











Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





























Item 2.02                      Results of Operations and Financial Condition





On November 7, 2012, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 30, 2012. A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1





Item 9.01                      Financial Statements and Exhibits





(c)           Exhibits.





99.1           Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated November 7, 2012.











SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CHYRON CORPORATION





By:
/s/ Jerry KieliszakName:
Jerry KieliszakTitle:
Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Exhibit No.
Description99.1
Press Release, dated November 7, 2012.











Date:  November 7, 2012
Presidential Documents

50697 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 168 

Thursday, August 28, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8279 of August 25, 2008 

National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month is an opportunity to underscore 

our commitment to fighting prostate cancer and to raise awareness about 

this highly treatable disease. 

Prostate cancer is the second most common type of cancer found in men, 

and one in six men will develop it during their lifetime. The cause of 

prostate cancer remains unknown, but early detection can lead to better 

treatment and increase the chances of survival. It is important for men 

to talk to their physicians about risk factors, prevention, and preventive 

screenings. 

My Administration remains committed to helping America’s dedicated medical professionals learn more about the cause of prostate cancer and develop 

new and better ways to combat it. Since 2005, the Cancer Genome Atlas 

has studied the genetic sources of all types of cancer. By supporting medical 

research, conducting clinical trials, and developing new surgical techniques 

to help patients recover quickly, the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

are helping lead the fight against prostate cancer. 

During National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, we remember those who 

lost the battle against prostate cancer, and we pray for their families and 

friends. We also remember those living with prostate cancer, celebrate the 

lives of survivors, and thank all the medical professionals who aid in these 

victories. By continuing our fight against this disease, we will make our 

Nation a healthier and more hopeful place. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2008 as 

National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month. I call upon government officials, 

businesses, communities, health care professionals, educators, and the people 

of the United States to reaffirm our Nations strong and ongoing commitment 

to the fight against prostate cancer. 


rmajette on PROD1PC71 with RULES
50698 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 168 / Thursday, August 28, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth 

day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtythird. 

[FR Doc. E8–20194 

Filed 8–27–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rmajette on PROD1PC71 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000327 16-MAY-2019 08:00 AM
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Alamo Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Philip Mann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alamo Energy Corp., and will be retained by Alamo Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/ Philip MannPhilip Mann,

Chief Financial Officer

April 21, 2011
# Fou rth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00342

- CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

and Implicity Management Company

,

Appellant s

v.

Mary WINTERS and Mila Cheatom,

Appellee s

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 03926 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After we granted Appellees’ first motion for extension of time to file the brief, Appellees ’

brief wa s due on May 2 5 , 2016. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b) , (d)

. On the due date, Appellee s filed an unopposed second motion for a n extension of time to file their brief until May 31 , 2016

. S ee id. R. 10.5(b)

. Appellees filed their brief on May 31, 2016.

Appellee s ’ motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellee s ’ brief is deemed
timely file d.

_________________________________ Patricia O . Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6027

THURMAN BRADFORD HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-450-2)

Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: July 18, 1996

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Bradford Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Angelone,

No. CA-95-450-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995). To the extent that the

record on appeal contains transcripts of Appellant's trial and sentencing hearing, we grant his motion for review of those documents.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED