alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****EXHIBIT 32.1****

 

****Certificationof Periodic Financial Report****

****Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****

 

Forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Saunders the ChiefExecutive Officer of Integrated Management Information, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 
| (i)    |   | the  Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the years ended  December 31, 2008 and 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (ii)   |   | the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                             |

 
| Date:  March 31, 2009              |
|-----------------------------------------|
| /s/  John Saunders                      |   |
| John  Saunders, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Swordfish Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Swordfish Financial, Inc.Date: November 29, 2010
By:
/s/ Michael AlexanderMichael AlexanderChief Executive Officer and President(principal executive officer)Date: November 29, 2010
By:
/s/ Randy MoseleyRandy MoseleyChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swordfish Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Swordfish Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Willie Blackman v. State

No. 25385.

October 3, 1951.

Hon. J. M. Rankin, Judge Presiding.

*289No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violation of the liquor law and assessed a fine of $250.00, from which he appeals.

It is stipulated in the record that the complaint, as well as the information, originally filed, charged appellant’s name as Willie Blackburn. The court permitted the county attorney to amend both the complaint and information by changing the name of the accused and making it charge Willie Blackman.

When this was done the complaint was vitiated. The instrument signed by the affiant, Roy E. Hillin, ceased to be a complaint. See Patillo v. State, 3 Texas Court of Appeals, page 442; Phariss vs. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 504, 126 S.W. 2d 981; Hedspeth v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 627, 160 S.W. 2d 928, and the authorities discussed therein.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

     We consent to the use in the Prospectus Supplements filedpursuant to Rule 424(b) dated September 26, 2007 to RegistrationStatement 333-133184 and Registration Statement 333-136297 on Form S-1of Neiman Marcus, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated September 21,2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofNeiman Marcus, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Neiman Marcus, Inc. and subsidiaries included inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2007.

 

 

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Dallas,Texas

September 21,2007

 

1

----
#### CITIZENS’ HARDWARE & FURNITURE CO. v. JONES.

No. 4818.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

May 4, 1934.

Wayne Stovall, of Jonesboro, for appellant.

Scarborough *&*Barham, of Ruston, for ap-pellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover an alleged balance due by defendant on open account. The account was for goods, wares, and merchandise, and began May 16, 1929, and continued regularly until November 29, 1930, when the last charge thereon was made. This suit was filed November 10, 1932.

Defendant denied that he is indebted unto plaintiff in the sum of $891.73 with interest, as alleged in its petition. Defendant also filed a plea of prescription of three years in bar of the account sued on.

There was judgment in the lower court sustaining the plea of prescription as to all of the account prior to November 10, 1929, and awarding plaintiff judgment for the aggregate of all items charged thereon from November 10, 1929. Plaintiff appealed.

The total of the account sued on was $1,084.33. This includes $107.53 interest, charged at 8 per cent. Therefore, the principal amount was $976.80. The total credits aggregate $192.50, leaving a balance of $784.-30 in principal due on the account Included in the account is the price of one Victrola, $165. It is admitted that this instrument was not purchased on the same basis as other articles were, but that it was to be paid for at the rate of $12 per month. The price was incorrectly included in the account. Therefore, the payments on the Victrola account, which embrace nearly all the credits given defendant, did not operate as an acknowledgment of the merchandise account, nor had the effect of interrupting the current of prescription against it.

It is conceded that all of the payments made by defendant were on account of the price of the Victrola, except $19 on October 24, 1930. It is fairly well established that this' amount was intended to pay for merchandise purchased when, or about when, the payment was made, and for that reason should not have been entered as a credit on the account.

It appears that some of the items of merchandise charged to defendant were purchased by his wife, while others were purchased by tenants on his father’s farm. He denies that he authorized these purchases to be made in his name or for his account, and denies any liability therefor; and for this reason he persistently denied the correctness of the account against him, refused to liquidate it by his notes, and declined to make payments thereon.

The lower court found that the account had not been acknowledged by defendant before prescription accrued against any part of same, and that the current of prescription was only interrupted by the filing of this suit. AVe agree with these conclusions, and affirm the judgment appealed from.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

________________



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): May 1, 2006



CHYRON CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

|New York                                       | 1-9014                   | 11-2117385                          
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

|5 Hub Drive                              |           
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|Melville, New York                       | 11747     
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 2.03   Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under
                   an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant

On May 1, 2006, Chyron Corporation (the "Company") entered into a Waiver Agreement (the "Agreement") with Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB") which amended the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 29, 2004 (as amended and as may be further amended and in effect from time to time, the "Credit Agreement") so as to waive the Company's failure to comply with the financial covenant in Section 5a. of the Schedule to the Credit Agreement (cumulative Minimum EBITDA requirement of $100,000) as of the quarter ended March 31, 2006.



Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits

10.1 Waiver Agreement dated May 1, 2006.







SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

CHYRON CORPORATION



| | By:    | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | Jerry Kieliszak          
| | Title: | Senior Vice President and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer  





|Exhibit No. | Description                       
|----------- | ----------------------------------
|            |                                   
|10.1        | Waiver Agreement dated May 1, 2006

Date: May 5, 2006
#### McINNIS v. BROWN.

No. 7218.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 27, 1948.

Floyd D. Culbertson, Jr., of Minden, for appellant.

Campbell & Campbell, of Minden, for appellee.

HARDY, Judge.

This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $600 on an I.O.U. of the defendant. The defense sets up the lack of any demand for payment, together with the plea that the obligation ’had been extinguished, and, finally, a reconventional demand for the sum of $600 alleged to be due for repairs performed by defendant on motor trucks owned by plaintiff. After trial there was judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount sued for, and further judgment dismissing defendant’s reconven-tional demands as of non-suit, from which judgment defendant prosecutes this appeal.

This matter involves solely a question of fact which was resolved by the learned Judge ad hoc in favor of plaintiff.

The instrument which forms the basis of plaintiff’s suit is typewritten on a letterhead of plaintiff’s insurance agency, signed by the defendant, and reads in full as follows:

> “November 15, 1946.

> “Mr. J. L. Mclnnis

> “Box 271

> “Minden, Louisiana

> “I owe you $600.00 payable in sixty (60) days.

> “(Signed) ‘L. T. Brown’

> “L. T. Brown”

There is no question as to the execution of the above described instrument, nor as to the fact that defendant actually received the sum of $600 in cash at the time of signing the said due bill. In consideration of these points, there can be no doubt but that plaintiff has satisfactorily discharged the burden placed upon him with respect to the establishment of the validity of the original obligation.

Turning to the defense advanced, we find that defendant strenuously contends that the money received on the due bill was actually a cash advance against his account for repairs to certain trucks owned by plaintiff. The preponderance of the evidence fails to bear out this claim on the part of defendant and this defense accordingly fails.

As to defendant’s reconventional demand, the evidence is too vague, confused *337and conflicting to serve as a basis for judgment. In recognition of these facts, and in a praiseworthy attempt to preserve whatever rights might be susceptible of definite establishment by defendant, the Judge ad hoc did not reject the reconventional demand but simply dismissed the same as of non-suit. This equitable action preserves defendant’s rights and, in our opinion, does substantial justice between the parties.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities; 
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities 
(PCPID).

ACTION: Notice of quarterly meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: September 9, 2008, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST; and September 
10, 2008, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Room 800 of the Hubert H. 
Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20201. 
Individuals who would like to participate via conference call may do so 
by dialing 888-603-6970, passcode: PCPID. Individuals who will need 
accommodations for a disability in order to attend the meeting (e.g., 
sign language interpreting services, assistive listening devices, 
materials in alternative formats such as large print or Braille) should 
notify MJ Karimi via e-mail at [email protected], or via 
telephone at 202-619-0634, no later than August 29, 2008. PCPID will 
attempt to meet requests made after that date, but cannot guarantee 
availability. All meeting sites are barrier free.
    Agenda: PCPID will meet to continue work on the 2009 Annual Report 
to the President.
    Additional Information: For further information, please contact 
Sally D. Atwater, Executive Director, President's Committee for People 
with Intellectual Disabilities, the Aerospace Center, Second Floor 
West, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447. Telephone: 
202-619-0634. Fax: 202-205-9591. E-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PCPID acts in an advisory capacity to the 
President and the Secretary of Health and Human Services on a broad 
range of topics relating to programs, services and supports for persons 
with intellectual disabilities. PCPID, by Executive Order, is 
responsible for evaluating the adequacy of current practices in 
programs, services and supports for persons with intellectual 
disabilities, and for reviewing legislative proposals that impact the 
quality of life experienced by citizens with intellectual disabilities 
and their families.

    Dated: August 19, 2008.
Sally D. Atwater,
Executive Director, President's Committee for People with Intellectual 
Disabilities.
[FR Doc. E8-19898 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6769 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6769

  To amend title 17, United States Code, to include requirements for 
      works adopted by reference into law, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2022

 Mr. Deutch (for himself and Mr. Issa) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 17, United States Code, to include requirements for 
      works adopted by reference into law, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting and Enhancing Public 
Access to Codes Act'' or the ``Pro Codes Act''.

SEC. 2. WORKS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO LAW.

    Chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new section:
``Sec. 123. Works Incorporated by Reference into Law
    ``(a) Work Incorporated by Reference Into Law or Regulation.--An 
original work of authorship otherwise subject to protection under this 
title that has been adopted or incorporated by reference, in full or in 
part, into any Federal, State, or municipal law or regulation, shall 
retain such protection only if the owner of the copyright makes the 
work available at no monetary cost for viewing by the public in 
electronic form on a publicly accessible website in a location on the 
website that is readily accessible to the public.
    ``(b) Burden of Proof.--In any cause of action in which a party 
asserts that the owner of a copyright has failed to comply with the 
requirements of subsection (a), the burden of proof shall be on the 
party making such an assertion to prove that the owner of the copyright 
has failed to comply.
    ``(c) Transparency.--Nothing in this section shall be construed as 
inconsistent with the requirements for transparency in Federal 
expenditure information as set forth in the DATA Act (Public Law 113-
101; 31 U.S.C. 6101).''.
                                 <all>
```
November 14, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUPUY, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00804-CR

NO. 14-13-00805-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6535 

To waive the cost-sharing requirements for certain STEM programs, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2022 

Mr. BOWMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To waive the cost-sharing requirements for certain STEM 

programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering STEM 

5 Discovery Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MANDATORY COST-SHARING. 

7 (a) WAIVER.—The cost-sharing requirements under 

8 section 7036(c) of the America Creating Opportunities to 

9 Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Edu10 cation, and Science Act (42 U.S.C. 1862o–14(c)) for the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6535 IH

1 Major Research Instrumentation Program and under sec2 tion 10A(i) of the National Science Foundation Authoriza3 tion Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 1862n–1a(i)) for teaching fel4 lowships administered within the Robert Noyce Teacher 

5 Scholarship Program are waived for a period of 5 years 

6 following the date of enactment of this Act. 

7 (b) ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 5 years after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit 

9 to Congress an assessment, that includes feedback from 

10 the research community, of the impacts of the waivers pro11 vided under subsection (a), including— 

12 (1) programmatic and scientific goals; 

13 (2) institutional commitment and stewardship 

14 of Federal resources; 

15 (3) institutional strategic planning and adminis16 trative burden; 

17 (4) equity among grantee institutions; and 

18 (5) recommendations for or against extending 

19 or making permanent such waivers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this quarterly report of Possis Medical, Inc. on Form 10Q for
the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Jules L. Fisher, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Possis Medical, Inc.





Date: March 9, 2007                          By:  /s/ Jules L. Fisher
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  JULES L. FISHER
                                                  Vice President of Finance
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer