alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicant

Aimpacific Service, Inc., 3380 Flair Drive, <greek-i>236, El Monte, CA 
91731, Officer: Shan Kung, Chief Operation Manager (Qualifying 
Individual).

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Golden Egg Warehouse Logistic, 5401 San Leandro Street, Oakland, CA 
94601, Chau Thai, Sole Proprietor,
Tri Star Freight System, Inc., 5407 Mesa Drive, Houston, TX 77028, 
Officer: Kathleen G. Nance, CEO (Qualifying Individual),
Apex Maritime Col, Inc. dba Apex Shipping Company, 208 Utah Avenue, So. 
San Francisco, CA 94080, Officers: Vicky Cheung, President, (Qualifying 
Individual) Lena Cheung, Secretary,
LT Freight International, Inc., 4751 Blanco Drive, San Jose, CA 95129, 
Officers: Tony Tian, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Lisa Tian, 
President.

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Baycor International, LLC, 110 Standifer Street, Humble, TX 77338, 
Officers: Jorge A. Aponte, President (Qualifying Individual), Mariela 
Guzman, Director.

    Dated: August 15, 2008.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19328 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600219

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

CAMERON M. SEMETA

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Colonel Peter S. Rubin, USMC.

For Appellant: Commander Suzanne M. Lachelier, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 15 September 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, RUGH and HUTCHISON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### Melvis TABE-EBOB, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-2201.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 2003.

Decided Aug. 12, 2003.

Danielle L.C. Beach-Oswald, Noto & Oswald, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, S. Kathleen Pepper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Melvis Tabe-Ebob petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) finding that she failed to establish exceptional circumstances warranting the immigration judge to reopen the removal proceedings. Tabe-Ebob contends: (1) she established that her failure to appear was due to exceptional circumstances and (2) the immigration judge erred by finding she did not submit an affidavit. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

This Court’s review of the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen is extremely deferential, and the decision will not be reversed absent abuse of discretion. *Stewart v. INS,*181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir.1999). Motions to reopen are disfavored. *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c) (2003). We find the BLA did not abuse its discretion in finding that Tabe-Ebob failed to establish exceptional circumstances warranting granting a motion to reopen. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i), (e)(1) (2000). Assuming, *arguendo,*that the immigration judge erred regarding the affidavit, this Court reviews only the Board’s findings. The Board has the authority to make its own findings. *Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 320 n. 6 (4th Cir.2002). Here, the Board made an independent finding as to Tabe-Ebob’s allegations in the motion to reopen.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
**EXHIBIT 32(a)****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Peter J. Burlage, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”),certify, that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Peter J. Burlage         Peter J. Burlage    President and Chief Executive Officer    Date: November 13, 2006  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.*
Exhibit 10.23 - NEOCompensation




Exhibit 10.23


Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc.
Summary of Compensation Arrangements
For Named Executive Officers 




Base Salaries and Target Bonus Percentages.  The current annual base salaries and target annual bonus opportunities (expressed a percentage of base salary) for the current named executive officers of Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc. (the “Company”) are as follows:


	
				
	Named Executive Officer
	Title
	Current Base Salary
	Target Bonus %

	Percy C. Tomlinson
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	$600,000
	85%

	Howard A. Aihara
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$299,580
	75%

	Richard W. Johns
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	$325,000
	75%

	Richard A. Jones
	President, Imaging Division
	$310,000
	75%






For 2014, under the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan (the “EIP”), the named executive officers are eligible to receive an annual cash bonus award that will be determined based on achievement against certain performance measures.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0512 RICHARD E. SHREVES ,

Petitioner and Appellant. vs. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OFLABOR and INDUSTRY, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE REVIEW TEAM , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PAUL REES ,

Respondents and Appellees .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), Appell ee s are given an extension of time until June 7, 2024 , to prepare, file, and serve their answer brief

s . **AS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW**

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 19 2024

04/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0512
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6547 

To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban 

Development to submit to the Congress a report on the New York 

City Housing Authority, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2022 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to submit to the Congress 

a report on the New York City Housing Authority, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NYCHA Account5 ability Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6547 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT TO THE CONGRESS ON NEW YORK CITY 

2 HOUSING AUTHORITY. 

3 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

4 of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of 

5 Housing and Urban Development shall submit to the Con6 gress a report that contains— 

7 (1) an analysis of health and safety conditions 

8 with respect to dwelling units owned or administered 

9 by the New York City Housing Authority; 

10 (2) an analysis of the New York City Housing 

11 Authority’s compliance with Federal, State, and 

12 local housing regulations; 

13 (3) an audit of the Federal funds received by 

14 the New York City Housing Authority during fiscal 

15 years 2014 through 2022; and 

16 (4) additional findings and recommendations of 

17 the Inspector General of the Department of Housing 

18 and Urban Development. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         909,426
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  553,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15,621
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,518,659
<PP&E>                                         20,754,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,115,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,362,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          316,997
<BONDS>                                        2,561,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,058
<COMMON>                                       173,140
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,362,056
<SALES>                                        798,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               798,998
<CGS>                                          163,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  588,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             90,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,974
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01



</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. DEAR & JOHNSON, Inc., v. BULLOCK et al.

No. 1636.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

July 20, 1936.

Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexan-. dria, for applicant.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the court, on June 30, 1936, handed down a decree on the original application for a writ of mandamus, to the effect that Miss Marguerite Ford, the official court reporter of the Eleventh judicial district court in and for the parish of Vernon, was a necessary, if not the real party in interest in this proceeding. (La.App.) 169 So. 124.

On July 3, 1936, the relator, acting on that decree, filed a petition in this court in which it prayed that Miss Ford be made a party hereto end that a writ of mandamus issue against her as well as against T. J. Bullock, the clerk of said court. On the same day, this court, acting through one of the judges, issued a rule against Miss Ford, ordering her to respond hereto at 10 a. m. on July 20, 1936. As appears from the post office registry receipt filed herein, she received proper notice on July 7, 1936.

Miss Ford has failed to make an appearance in answer to the rule, and in the absence of any showing on her part, the same will be made absolute.

It is our opinion that it is the duty of the official court reporter to transcribe the notes of testimony taken by her in the trial of this case in the district court in Vernon parish and to file the same with the clerk of the said court to the end that he may complete the transcript so that the case may be heard on appeal.

In the event judgment should finally go against the defendant-appellant, Miss Ford, the official court reporter will be protected for her fees and costs under the *416appeal bond filed herein. Should judgment be finally rendered against the plaintiff who is prosecuting his suit under the benefit of Act No. 156 of 1912 and its amendments, known as the Pauper Act, unfortunately as it may turn out to be for her she will have to submit to the consequences as that act specially provides that the litigant who avails himself of its provisions is entitled to the services of the official court 'reporter without the payment of costs.

For the reasons stated, it is ordered that the alternative writs of mandamus heretofore issued be, and the same are hereby made peremptory, and it is further ordered that Miss Marguerite Ford, official court reporter of the Eleventh judicial district court in and for Vernon parish, file with T. J. Bullock, clerk of the said court, on or before September 15, 1936, a complete transcript of the oral testimony taken on the trial of this case in the district court, and the said T. J, Bullock, clerk of the said court, is now ordered on the filing of the said testimony by the official court reporter 'with him to transmit the same to this court on or before October 5, 1936.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy P. Leybold, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Not applicable.
|-- | ---------------



|4. | Not applicable.
|-- | ---------------



|5. | Not applicable.
|-- | ---------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ TIMOTHY P. LEYBOLD                                   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Timothy P. Leybold                                       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Interim Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)             



48
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6647 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements relating 

to the eligibility of veterans to receive reimbursement for emergency 

treatment furnished through the Veterans Community Care program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2022 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington (for herself, Mr. BERGMAN, and Mr. PAPPAS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain 

improvements relating to the eligibility of veterans to 

receive reimbursement for emergency treatment furnished 

through the Veterans Community Care program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR REIMBURSE4 MENT FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT FUR5 NISHED TO VETERANS. 

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

7 1725(b)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6647 IH

1 by inserting ‘‘, unless such emergency treatment was fur2 nished during the 60-day period following the date on 

3 which the veteran enrolled in the health care system speci4 fied in subparagraph (A), in which case no requirement 

5 for prior receipt of care shall apply’’ before the period. 

6 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub7 section (a) shall apply with respect to emergency treat8 ment furnished on or after the date that is one year after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2011



/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a
separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intcomex, Inc. and
will be retained by Intcomex, Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commision or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF
J. C. PENNEY FUNDING CORPORATION AS OF APRIL 26, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,717
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                         982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,717
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (28)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     28
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 18
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        18
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6457 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6457

   To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to a local educational 
agency unless in-person instruction is available to all students at the 
                     schools served by the agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2022

    Mrs. Miller of Illinois (for herself and Mr. Good of Virginia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to a local educational 
agency unless in-person instruction is available to all students at the 
                     schools served by the agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CERTAIN LOCAL EDUCATIONAL 
              AGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--No Federal funds shall be provided to a local 
educational agency unless in-person instruction is available to all 
students at each public elementary school and secondary school under 
the jurisdiction of the local educational agency.
    (b) Definitions.--In this Act, the terms ``elementary school'', 
``local educational agency'', and ``secondary school'' have the 
meanings given such terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
                                 <all>
```