alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>

     EXHIBIT 27
     PETRIE STORES LIQUIDATING TRUST
     FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     the Liquidating Trust's statement of net assets in liquidation at
     September 30, 1996 and the Liquidating Trust's statements of changes
     in net assets in liquidation for the period from January 22, 1996 to
     September 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
     such financial statements.

     </LEGEND>
     <MULTIPLIER>      1,000
            
     <S>               <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>     9-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
     <PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1996
     <CASH>                                   126,654
     <SECURITIES>                             147,244
     <RECEIVABLES>                                  0
     <ALLOWANCES>                                   0
     <INVENTORY>                                    0 
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 
     <PP&E>                                         0 
     <DEPRECIATION>                                 0 
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                           273,898
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     44,762
     <BONDS>                                        0
     <COMMON>                                       0
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
     <PREFERRED>                                    0
     <OTHER-SE>                               229,136
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             273,898
     <SALES>                                        0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
     <CGS>                                          0
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                          18,645
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
     <INCOME-TAX>                                   0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                       26,542
     <DISCONTINUED>                                 0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
     <CHANGES>                                      0
     <NET-INCOME>                              26,542
     <EPS-PRIMARY>                                .51
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                .51
             

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(ii)
                               --------------


                               CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-15CB (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ----------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
#### NORIAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Nos. 02-1490, 02-1506, 02-1507.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 31, 2002.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Norian Corporation moves to treat its appeal, docketed as 02-1507, as a supplement to its previous notice of appeal, 02-1490. In the alternative, Norian moves to reinstate appeal 02-1507. Stryker Corporation opposes. Norian replies.

On May 2, 2002, after trial, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered judgment regarding invalidity of one patent. Norian filed post-judgment motions which the district court decided on June 18, 2002. On July 1, 2002, Norian filed a notice of appeal (02-1506), stating that it was seeking review of matters related to the patent that had been held invalid. On July 10, 2002, the district court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a), entered an order that amended the earlier judgment to include its previous determination, by summary judgment, that *435a second patent was not infringed. On July 18, 2002, Norian filed another appeal (02-1507), stating that it was also seeking review of matters relating to the second patent that was found to not be infringed.* Norian failed to timely pay a filing fee with this second appeal, and this court dismissed appeal 02-1507 for failure to pay the filing fee.

Norian states that counsel did not believe that a second filing fee was required for the second appeal, based on counsel’s misunderstanding that it was an amended notice of appeal. However, a second appeal was required to seek review of the issues that had not been included in the earlier appeal and were included in the amended judgment. In the event that the second notice of appeal is not treated as an amended notice of appeal, Norian offers to pay the fee.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Noriaris motion to treat its second notice of appeal as a supplemental notice of appeal is denied.

(2) Norian’s alternative motion to reinstate appeal 02-1507 is granted. The mandate is recalled and the court’s order dismissing 02-1507 for failure to pay the fee is vacated. Norian shall pay the filing fee with the district court within 10 days of the date of filing of this order.

(3) The revised official caption is reflected above.

*

 Because both of Norian’s appeals were filed within 30 days after entry of the order denying the post-judgment motions, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 4, they were both timely filed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SoOum  Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ending  March 31, 2016 , I, William Westbrook, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31,2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  October 5, 2016

SoOum Corp.



By:   /s/ William Westbrook

William Westbrook
Exhibit 10.10


 


 


 April 2, 2014


 


 


Board of Directors


Medical Transcription Billing, Corp.


7 Clyde Road


Somerset, NJ 08873


 


Dear Sir,


 


This letter confirms that I have the ability and intent to provide
financial support, if and as needed to enable Medical Transcription Billing, Corp. (the “Company”) to continue as a
going concern until the earlier of May 31, 2015 or when the Company needs the support.


 


 


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Mahmud Haq


Mahmud Haq


 


Cc: Deloitte LLP
ex-3d_amend


EXHIBIT 10.10 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN OF AVON PRODUCTS, INC. 


        THIS THIRD AMENDMENT
  is made on this 25th day of March, 2002, by AVON PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation
  duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York (hereinafter
referred to as the “Primary Sponsor”). 


  INTRODUCTION

  The Primary Sponsor maintains the Benefit Restoration
  Plan of Avon Products, Inc. (the “Plan”), which was adopted by an
  indenture dated July 1, 1998. The Primary Sponsor now desires to amend the
Plan to provide additional optional forms of distribution. 


  AMENDMENT


        NOW, THEREFORE, the Primary Sponsor hereby amends
  the Plan, effective for distributions commencing after April 1, 2002, by deleting
  the “or” at the end of Section 3.2(a)(2), by substituting “; or” for the
“.” at the end of Section 3.2(a)(3), and by and adding the following
new Sections 3.2(a)(4) and 3.2(a)(5) as follows:


  
         “(4) In monthly installments over a period
    of 60 months; or

  
         “(5) A partial lump sum and either a partial annuity described in either Paragraph (2) or (3) above or a partial installment payment described in Paragraph (4), in such ten percent (10%)
    increments of a Member’s benefit as directed by the Member.”




        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Third Amendment to be executed on the date and year first above written.


  	AVON
            PRODUCTS, INC. 
	 	 	 
	By:	 /s/
          Avon Products, Inc. 
	 	

	 	 	 
	Title:
Order entered April 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00195-CV

IN RE MUAMAR ASAD SAYYED, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-82405-07

ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek

Based on the Court’s opinion issued on April 3, 2020,

1 we DENY relator’s 

February 13, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 

1 This nunc pro tunc is being entered to reflect April 3, 2020 as the correct date of issuance.
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            672 - INDX 2006-AR6



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on
Form 10-K of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. Archbold, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 17, 2010



/s/ Michael G. ArchboldMichael G. ArchboldChief Financial and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
#### Thomas A. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KEYCORP, Key Bank National Association (f/k/a Key Bank of New York, N.A., Key Bank of Southeastern New York), Robert G. Qulia, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 01-9267(L).

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2002.

Thomas A. Martin, pro se, Chapel Hill, NC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michael J. Smith, Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Albany, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present LEVAD, CALABRESI and B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Thomas A. Martin appeals from three rulings of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Scullin, *C.J.).*In a September 29, 2000 decision and order, the district court denied Martin’s motion for recusal, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denied the defendants’ request for Rule 11 sanctions, and permanently enjoined Martin from commencing additional federal actions relating to the events surrounding that case. Martin subsequently filed a 60(b) motion for reconsideration of this order. On September 27, 2001, the district court denied Martin’s motion for reconsideration and ordered Martin to show cause why he should not be sanctioned under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 for filing the 60(b) motion. Finally, on December 10, 2001, the district court imposed Rule 11 sanctions, directing Martin to reimburse the defendants for reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses relating to his motion for reconsideration.

The events underlying this case and the long history of litigation they have given rise to are fully described in the district court’s decision of September 29, 2000. *Martin v. Keycorp.,*No. 99-CV-1667, slip op. at 2-6 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2000).

We have examined the record and conclude that the district court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, since all of Martin’s claims were barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel. It is also clear from the record that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martin’s motion for recusal, as there was no showing of bias. Nor did the court abuse its discretion in denying Martin’s 60(b) motion for relief from a final judgment, since Martin failed *57to indicate any controlling decisions or data overlooked by the court that could reasonably be expected to alter its decision. The imposition of Rule 11 sanctions for filing the 60(b) motion was also well within the district court’s discretion in view of the complete meritlessness of that motion. Moreover, given Martin’s long history of repeated attempts to relitigate claims already adjudged against him, we find no error in the district court’s injunction against future filings.

We have considered all of Martin’s arguments and find them without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
Exhibit 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Mark W. Simon, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

1.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2003
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2003

                                  /s/  Mark W. Simon
                                  --------------------------
                                  Mark W. Simon
                                  Senior Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





Wilshire
      Credit Corporation


14523
      SW
      Millikan Way


Suite
      200


Beaverton,
      Oregon 97005





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-HE2





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Wilshire Credit
      Corporation, as servicer and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee,
      relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-HE2





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1763-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1763-DR), dated May 27, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 18, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 27, 2008. 

Winnebago County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance). 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-20076 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARK JONES,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2941

[June 1, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-27301 

CACE.

Bruce Botsford of Bruce Botsford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Eric M. Levine and Adam G. Schwartz of Atlas │ Solomon, PLLC, Stuart, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.