alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 





Unanimous Action Confirmation Letter


 


The undersigned (the “Signatories”) of this Unanimous
Action Confirmation Letter (the “Confirmation”), all being partners of Wuxi Binhu District KangJiaFu Royal Traditional
Health Preserving Club, a Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), hold collectively 100% equity interest in the Partnership,
of which Wuxi KangJiaFu Royal Traditional Health Management Co., Ltd. (the “Wuxi KJF”) as a partner has a 39.8% share;


 


The Signatories hereby agree and confirm that Wuxi KJF is authorized
to exercise such rights on behalf of all other partners in all matters in connection with the Partnership and adopt such resolutions
as if they had been adopted by the Partnership partner meetings, and further agree and confirm that, as of the date hereof, all
signatories shall act in concert with the Wuxi KJF.


 


This Confirmation is executed on January 26, 2011 by the following
Signatories:


 


/seal/Wuxi KangJiaFu Royal Traditional Health Management Co.


Legal Representative:/s/
Yazhong Liao


 


And other partners: /s/


Hongmei Xu, Xueya Zhang, Yufeng Jin, Chunyan Cai, Huiwen Qu,
Meihua Jin,


Xiaoling Hu, Xinya Ding, Xiaoyi Wang, Jiaqiu Jin, Yunying Xu
Exhibit
            99.1
  Annual
            Servicer’s Certificate
 Provided
            by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
 to
            Holders of Notes and Certificates







**NISSAN
      MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**




**OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE**




The
      undersigned, Jeffrey L. Edwards, Vice President, Operations of NISSAN MOTOR
      ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
      certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The
      undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its
      capacity as Servicer, during the period July 31, 2006 through March 31, 2007
      (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to that certain Sale
      and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2006 (the “Agreement”), by
      and among the Company, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as Seller, and
      Nissan Auto Receivables 2006-C Owner Trust, as Issuer (the “Issuer”), to be
      conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To
      the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the Reporting
      Periodexcept
      for (a) those exceptions described in the Company’s “Report on Assessment of
      Compliance with Servicing Criteria” filed with the Issuer’s Form 10-K on June
      29, 2007, and (b) certain technical instances of non-compliance with certain
      reporting requirements and the timing of funds transfers, discovered by the
      Company during the course of its Regulation AB assessment of compliance, that
      individually and in the aggregate do not have a material adverse impact on
      the
      Noteholders and do not create a Servicer Default under the
      Agreement.




This
      Officer’s Certificate is being furnished to Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner
      Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, Standard
      & Poor’s Ratings Services and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., as required
      by Section 4.09(a) of the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used but
      not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
      Agreement.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 29th day of
      June,
      2007.







Jeffrey
      L. Edwards


Vice
      President, Operations
So 3-31-14 Q Ex 10(e)1






EXHIBIT 10(e)1


BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2014 unless otherwise noted, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Mississippi Power Company and certain other executive officers of Mississippi Power Company who served during 2013.




	
			
	G. Edison Holland, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$665,176
	 

	Edward Day, VI*
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$418,454
	 

	Moses Feagin
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
	$252,668
	 

	John W. Atherton
Vice President
	$258,975
	 

	Jeff G. Franklin
Vice President
	$256,531
	 

	John C. Huggins
Vice President
	$212,513
	 








*Retired May 20, 2013. Salary shown was Mr. Day’s salary effective March 1, 2013.
Exhibit 32.2











Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Neuralstem, Inc. (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Conron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1).           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2).           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 16, 2011





/s/ John Conron


John Conron


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal period ending October 29, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tod A.Nestor, Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# (1)              The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

#  

 
|                                               |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Tod A.  Nestor                                     |
| Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| April 8,  2008                                |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6094

JOHN C. ALSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA99-431-DKC) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John C. Alston, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John C. Alston seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v. Corcoran , No. CA-99-431-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-2221

IN RE CITIGROUP, INC., CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN LITIGATION,

WILLIAM LOMAS, On Behalf of Himself

and All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on July 16, 2004, is amended

as follows:

page 7, line 8: delete the word "arbitration" following "motion to

stay."
```

                                                                    Exhibit 34.2

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria, that JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association (the "Bank") complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the "CFR") for the Bank's Honda Auto Receivables 2006-1 Owner Trust
asset-backed securitization transaction backed by auto receivables and serviced
by the Bank as of March 31, 2006 and for the period from March 28, 2006 (the
date of issuance of the Honda Auto Receivables 2006-1 Owner Trust) through March
31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), except for servicing criteria (d)(1)(i) -
(iv), 2(i), 2(iii) - (vii), 3(i) and 4(i) - (xv) in Section 229.1122(d) of the
CFR, which the Bank has concluded are servicing criteria not applicable to the
servicing of the Honda Auto Receivables 2006-1 Owner Trust asset-backed
securitization transaction backed by auto receivables and serviced by the Bank
(the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The sole asset-backed securitization
transaction covered by this report is the Honda Auto Receivables 2006-1 Owner
Trust. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank complied with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of March 31, 2006 and for the period from March
28, 2006 through March 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
June 20, 2006
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, August 28, 2008 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, August 28, 2008 will be:

Formal orders of investigation;

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature;

Resolution of litigation matters; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:  The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: August 21, 2008.

Florence E. Harmon,

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-19791 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,618] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on June 30, 2008 in response to a worker petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of Whirlpool Corporation, Fort Smith, Arkansas. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of August 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8-20044 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6677 

To amend the Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune 

Families Act of 2012 to modify the eligibility requirements for entities 

collaborating with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide case 

management services to homeless veterans under the Veterans Affairs 

supported housing program of the Department of Housing and Urban 

Development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Ms. JACOBS of California (for herself and Ms. MACE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in 

addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for 

Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 to modify the eligibility requirements for entities collaborating with the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide case management services to homeless veterans under the Veterans 

Affairs supported housing program of the Department 

of Housing and Urban Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6677 IH

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR ENTITIES COLLABORATING WITH 

3 THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 

4 PROVIDE CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO 

5 HOMELESS VETERANS IN THE DEPARTMENT 

6 OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT-DE7 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUP8 PORTED HOUSING PROGRAM. 

9 Section 304(c)(2) of the Honoring America’s Vet10 erans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 

11 (Public Law 112–154; 38 U.S.C. 2041 note) is amend12 ed— 

13 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

14 through (E) as subparagraphs (C) through (F), re15 spectively; and 

16 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol17 lowing new subparagraph (B): 

18 ‘‘(B) providing case management services 

19 to veterans for obtaining suitable housing at 

20 varying locations nationwide or in the area or 

21 areas similar to where the services will be pro22 vided under the relevant contract or agree23 ment;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________

CHARMAYNE M. KIRKLAND,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

__________________________

2013-3075

__________________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CB7121120003-V-1.

__________________________

ON MOTION

__________________________

O R D E R

Charmayne M. Kirkland moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

Case: 13-3075 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2013
CHARMAYNE KIRKLAND V. DHS 2

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s21 

Case: 13-3075 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 03/11/2013
#### BROCATO v. BROCATO.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

July 20, 1954.

Rohan, Reedy, Flanagan & Jacobs, Miami, for appellant.

Rayman & Duhig, Miami, for appellee.

THOMAS, Justice.

The appellant and appellee, husband and wife, executed a purchase-money mortgage, both signing the note which it secured. Subsequently the mortgagees sold and assigned the note and mortgage to the wife, appellant, who brought suit to foreclose against the appellee, her husband.

The husband moved to dismiss on the lone ground that no cause of action had been stated and the chancellor concluding that the wife by the purchase had simply paid the debt, since she was “one of the makers of the note and the mortgage and personally liable,” dismissed the bill with prejudice.

The appellant presents here a question based on the premise that the title to the property on which the mortgage was given was taken by the husband “In His Own Name Only” and argues that the wife was an accommodation party, surety for the husband, and entitled to recover from him the amount she paid.

We do not feel obliged to give appellant an answer because we cannot construe the allegations as support for appellant’s premise unless we indulge her a presumption to which she is not as a pleader entitled. Evidently she thinks that an averment in the complaint that the mortgage was given on property “then in the possession of James E. Brocato * * * and to which he claimed the fee simple title” is synonymous with the statement in the brief that “the defendant, James E. Brocato, took title in his own name.” We cannot agree, especially as the allegation is preceded by one that the two persons “being indebted [to the mortgagees] for the purchase of the * * * property * * * executed and *59delivered their promissory note” for a certain amount and “thereby promised to pay” the debt.

We do not wish to appear hypertechnical but if the bill is construed against the plead•er, we come to the conclusion that man and wife bought a tract of land, received a deed to it, owed part of the purchase price and .gave a mortgage to secure their debt. This is a factual situation far different from one where a man purchases and gives a purchase-money mortgage which the wife need not sign. In the first instance, which we think is the one presented here, the wife could not enforce a mortgage signed by her on property she and her husband held in an estate by the entirety.

We have been shown no reason to disturb the decree so it is

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON and DREW, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         140,831
<SECURITIES>                                   248,950
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,495,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   140,317
<INVENTORY>                                  4,106,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,408,408
<PP&E>                                       7,760,305
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,415,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,133,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,466,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,454,742
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,125,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,133,277
<SALES>                                     17,276,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,276,653
<CGS>                                       12,127,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,127,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,326,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                26,575
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,825
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,233
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
 September 30,
    
    
    December 31,2005
    
    
    2004Short-term debt
    
    $
    31.1
    
    
    
    78.8Current portion of long-term debt
    
    
    43.0
    
    
    
    45.9Long-term debt
    
    
    656.6
    
    
    
    972.2Total debt
    
    
    730.7
    
    
    
    1,096.9Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    897.0
    
    
    
    555.1Shareholders equity
    
    
    5,824.3
    
    
    
    4,343.1Total capitalization
    
    $
    7,452.0
    
    
    
    5,995.1Ratio of total debt to total capitalization
    
    
    9.8
    %
    
    
    18.3
    %