alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50644-50645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for a 
New Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA is submitting the following information collection to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until October 27, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
the NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Jeryl Fish, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, Fax No. 
703-837-2861, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d09f93999f9db1b9bc90beb3a5b1feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="054a464c4a48646c69456b6670642b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    Title: Large Credit Union Financials and Board Packages.
    OMB Number: 3133-NEW.
    Form Number: None.

[[Page 50645]]

    Type of Review: New collection.
    Description: The region needs the information to effectively 
monitor financial trends and emerging issues of federally insured 
credit unions (FICUs) $1 billion or greater between onsite visitations. 
These institutions present greater risk to the NCUSIF due to their 
asset size and complexity.
    Respondents: Federally insured credit unions (FICUs) with $1 
billion or greater in assets.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 30.
    Estimated Burden Hours per Response: \1/2\ hour (30 minutes).
    Frequency of Response: Monthly.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 180 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: 0.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on August 20, 
2008.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-19794 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RJF-EX10.13.4_2014.03.31-10Q


EXHIBIT 10.13.4


[Fifth Third Bank Logo]


March 24, 2014
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
880 Carillon Parkway
Saint Petersburg, FL 33716
Attention: Treasury Department/Cash Management
Re:     Uncommitted Line of Credit Agreement - Extension of Termination Date
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is hereby made to that certain Uncommitted Line of Credit Agreement between RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. (the “Borrower”) and FIFTH THIRD BANK (the “Lender”), dated as of September 27, 2011 (as the same has been and may further be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”).  Reference is hereby also made to that certain Demand Note of the Borrower, dated as of September 27, 2011 (as the same has been and may further be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the  “Note,” and together with the Credit Agreement and all related documents, collectively referred to herein as the “Loan Documents”).  
The Borrower has requested that the Lender extend the Termination Date under, and as defined in, the Credit Agreement, and the Lender is willing to do so under the terms and conditions set forth in this letter agreement.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Loan Documents to the contrary, by signing below, the Lender and the Borrower agree to delete the date “March 22, 2014” in Section 1 of the Credit Agreement and replace such date with the following date: “June 20, 2014”.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the Loan Documents shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their original terms.
This letter shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of New York (including Section 5-1401 of the General Obligations Law of New York), without regard to conflicts of laws principles that would require application of another law.  This letter may be executed in counterparts and by different parties hereto on separate counterpart signature pages, each of which shall be an original, but all together to be one and the same instrument.  Delivery of executed counterparts of this letter by telecopy or by e-mail transmission of an Adobe portable document format file (also known as a “PDF” file) shall be effective as originals.



118


Raymond James Financial, Inc.
March 24, 2014




Very truly yours,


FIFTH THIRD BANK, an Ohio banking corporation
By:  /s/ Rachel Bonomo
Name:  Rachel Bonomo
Title:  Assistant Vice President





[SIGNATURE PAGE TO LETTER AGREEMENT]
119




Raymond James Financial, Inc.
March 24, 2014




Acknowledged and agreed.
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
By:  /s/ Paul C. Reilly
Name:  Paul C. Reilly
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO LETTER AGREEMENT]
120
EXHIBIT 31.4
                       CERTIFICATION

I, Debra L. Reed, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern
California Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

August 7, 2003

/S/ DEBRA L. REED
Debra L. Reed
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32(a)****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Peter J. Burlage, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”),certify, that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Peter J. Burlage Peter J. Burlage    President and Chief Executive Officer    Date: November 6, 2007  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.*
So 3-31-14 Q Ex 10(a)1






Exhibit 10(a)1




BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


THE SOUTHERN COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2014 unless otherwise noted, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Southern Company (the “Company”) and certain other executive officers of the Company who served during 2013.




	
			
	Thomas A. Fanning
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	

$1,200,000
	 

	Art P. Beattie
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	

$673,498
	 

	W. Paul Bowers
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia Power Company
	

$787,338
	 

	Kimberly S. Greene
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	

$650,000
	 

	Charles D. McCrary*
Executive Vice President of the Company,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power Company
	

$803,247
	 








*Resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alabama Power Company March 1, 2014. Retirement effective May 1, 2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029317
<NAME> NATIONAL ACCOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,186
<INVENTORY>                                     68,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,105
<PP&E>                                          87,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### In Re the Petition of William McCaleb, in the Matter of the Coon Run Drainage and Levee District.

1. Appeals—Ureder *Sec. 58 of the Levee*Act.—The only appeals allowed by law under section 58 of the levee act are to the Supreme Court, where the confirmation of special assessments is involved, and to the Circuit Court in other cases, where the orders are of a final character.

*29Petition to Set Aside Order of Approval of Report of Commissioners of Drainage District. — Appeal from the County Court of Morgan County; the Hon. Charles A. Barnes, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1902.

Dismissed.

Opinion filed November 1, 1902.

J. M. Riggs, attorney for appellant.

Worthington & Reeve, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wright

delivered the opinion of the court.

Strueter and Purnell, two of the commissioners of Coon Run Drainage District, made a report to the County Court under section 41 of the levee act, concerning drainage, which was by the court approved July 31, 1901, after which and at the ensuing December term of the County Court the appellant, McCaleb, the other commissioner, filed his petition alleging wherein the report of the commissioners was wrong, and taking exceptions thereto, in which he asked the court to set aside the order of approval and for a further hearing upon such report; the court sustained a demurrer to the petition and entered its final order dismissing it, from which order appellant obtained and perfected the present appeal to this court.

A motion has been entered in this court to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason, as has been alleged and argued, that such appeal does not lie from the County Court to this court, but only to the Circuit Court. It is objected by the counsel for appellant that the motion has not been made by the proper parties., If we have no jurisdiction of the appeal, it will subserve no good purpose td discuss the question who in fact are the interested parties, Strueter and Purnell, or the drainage district, for the purpose of making such motion. If this court is without jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the appeal and another court had such jurisdiction, we would be required to dismiss it of our own motion.

In Allman et al. v. Lumsden et al., 48 Ill. App. 17, where an order was made by the County Court annexing lands to the district under the provisions of section 58 of the same *30act, this court held that the appeal from such an order was direct to the Circuit Court and not to this court; that the only appeals under the act in question allowed by law are to the Supreme Court where the confirmation of special assessments is involved, and to the Circuit Court in other cases, where the orders are of final character. We are unable to perceive any reason for prosecuting the present appeal to this court, when the one in the case cited would not lie. The reasoning applies alike to both cases. The appeal should have been -taken to the Circuit Court, and it will be dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                    PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
(Unaudited; dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     September 30,    December 31,
                                                         2002             2001
                                                       --------         --------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>
Short-term debt ...............................        $   36.7             59.3
Current portion of long-term debt .............           136.4            269.7
Long-term debt ................................         2,021.6          2,522.0
                                                       --------         --------
     Total debt ...............................         2,194.7          2,851.0

Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries            63.1             59.4
Shareholders' equity ..........................         3,111.1          2,707.2
                                                       --------         --------
     Total capitalization .....................        $5,368.9          5,617.6
                                                       ========         ========

Ratio of total debt to total capitalization ...            40.9%            50.8%
                                                       ========         ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                          52,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,765
<INVENTORY>                                    331,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               467,266
<PP&E>                                         942,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,648,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          363,251
<BONDS>                                      1,380,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,641
<OTHER-SE>                                   (145,181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,648,842
<SALES>                                      1,507,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,533,278
<CGS>                                        1,177,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,177,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               337,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,748)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company



Depositor:  Structured Asset Securities Corporation
            745 Seventh Avenue, 8th Floor
            New York, NY 10019


Trustee:    Citibank, N.A.
            388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor
            New York, NY 10013
            Attention Citibank Agency & Trust

Securities Administrator:


Subject:        Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:    2006
Securitization: SAS 2006-3H

I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora
Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the
Calendar Year 2006:

1.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement
for such period has been made under my supervision.

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
aspects throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been
a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have
specifically identified to the Depositor, and the Trustee each such failure
known to me and the nature and status thereof, including the steps being taken
by the Master Servicer to remedy such default.


                             Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC




                                           By:/s/ E. Todd Whittemore
                                              ------------------------------
                                           Name:  E. Todd Whittemore
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
#### POWELL v. STONE, Sheriff.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

July 10, 1936.

M. S. McGregor, of De Land, for plaintiff in error.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BUFORD, Justice.

The writ of error in this case brings for review judgment of the circuit court in and for Volusia county, Fla., in habeas corpus proceedings remanding .to the custody of the sheriff a minor child under 17 years of age who had been convicted in the court of the justice of the peace of the Fourth district of Volusia county of the offense of assault and battery, and sentenced to pay a fine of $15, and, in default thereof, to serve 30 days in the county jail.

It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that a justice of the peace may not commit to jail to serve a penal sentence a minor under 17 years' of age who has been charged with a criminal offense and convicted of such offense in the court of the justice of the peace. This contention is supported by the opinion and judgment in the cases of Ex parte Elmo Kitts, a Minor, 109 Fla. 202, 147 So. 573, and State ex rel. Stiegel v. Chapman, 119 Fla. 347, 161 So. 424.

On authority of the opinions and judgments in those cases, the judgment herein is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions that the said Janie Powell he produced before the juvenile court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this judgment.

So ordered.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4167

_____________________________
W ILLIE J AMES O DOM , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. July 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OBERTS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Willie James Odom, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.