alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GROSJEAN, Collector of Revenue, v. CRESCENT CIGAR & TOBACCO CO.*

No. 17142.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 6, 1939.

For former opinion, see 185 So. 716.

Deynoodt & de la Vergne and Bennett Meyers, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., and Justin C. Daspit and Maurice B: Gatlin, Sp. Assts. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*

Writ of certiorari denied by Supreme Court April 3, 1939.

PER CURIAM.

Rehearing refused. See Per Curiam rendered this day in the'case of Alice Lee Grosjean, Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana v. Valloft & Dreupc, Inc., La.App., 186 So. 364.

Rehearing refused.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 24, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00285

- CR

Terence W. SPENCER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Ju dicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR1677

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A Trial Court ’ s Certification of Defendant ’ s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “ is a plea

- bargain case,

and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk

file a n electronic clerk ’ s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the

following documents:

1. All pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, t he Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant ’ s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post

-

judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court ’ s Certification of Defendant ’ s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk

of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court

c lerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter ’s record in this appeal.

________________________ _________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of May, 2019

.

_______________________ ____________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1374-000]


ISO Trader, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

August 21, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of ISO Trader, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is September 11, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#61272433222e0f0d080f04321411110e131521070413024f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96d0d3c4d5d9f8fafff8f3c5e3e6e6f9e4e2d6f0f3e4f5b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19926 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                         
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,970,837
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  520,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                   24,395
<INVENTORY>                                    268,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,567,866
<PP&E>                                         21,427,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,943,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,885,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,109,423
<BONDS>                                        3,084,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,128
<COMMON>                                       1,582,124
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,607,886
<SALES>                                        1,644,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,663,155
<CGS>                                          1,109,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,513,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               639,043
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,343,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,343,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,577,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.16)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of William H. Kirkholder, Deceased. Florine A. Kirkholder, Appellant; Eugene S. Knapp, as Executor, etc., of William H. Kirkholder, Deceased, and Others, Respondents.

Decree affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
229 So.2d 26

#### Jimmy SCHOFIELD v. STATE of Alabama.

3 Div. 447.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 4, 1969.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Richard F. Calhoun, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Williamson & Taber, Greenville, opposed.

HARWOOD, Justice.

Petition of the State, on the relation of its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Schofield v. State, 45 Ala.App. 191, 227 So.2d 822 (3 Div. 1).

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., LAWSON, SIMPSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, BLOODWORTH and MADDOX, JJ., concur.

McCALL, J., not sitting.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DEANDRE DERRICK MEIGHAN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 30008

D.C. No. 2:13

- cr

- 00008

- WFN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2018 **

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Deandre Derrick Meighan appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 100

- month concurrent sentence s imposed following his guilty

- plea

conviction s for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a

controlled substance , in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 30008

Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meighan ’s counsel has filed

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provide d Meighan the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for re lief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 29, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00020-CR

NO. 14-19-00021-CR

NO. 14-19-00022-CR

NO. 14-19-00023-CR

KENNETH WAYNE PHILLIPS, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 177th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 923443, 923444, 924337, and 924338 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant, Kenneth Wayne Phillips, pleaded guilty to and was convicted of 

four offenses on February 18, 2003: possession of a firearm (trial number 923443, 

appeal number 14-19-00020-CR); theft of a firearm (trial number 923444, appeal 

number 14-19-00021-CR); aggravated assault (trial number 924337, appeal number 

14-19-00022-CR); and aggravated robbery (trial number 924338, appeal number 14-

19-00023-CR). Pursuant to the terms of a plea-bargain agreement between appellant 
2

and the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to 35 years’ imprisonment for each 

offense, with the sentences to run concurrently. Appellant filed a notice of appeal

from each judgment of conviction on December 26, 2018. 

We lack jurisdiction over these appeals for two reasons: the notices of appeal 

were not filed timely, and these are plea bargain cases with no appealable matters 

and appellant has not been granted permission to appeal.

First, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after 

sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements 

of Rule 26.2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 

981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a 

court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. 

Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Appellant’s notices of appeal were filed nearly sixteen years after the sentences were 

imposed. Therefore, the appeals were not timely perfected. 

Second, in a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was 

guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment 

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may 

appeal only matters raised by a written, pretrial motion or with the trial court’s 

permission. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant’s punishments do not exceed the 

agreed lengths of confinement. The records do not contain any appealable pretrial 

rulings, and the trial court did not grant appellant permission to appeal.

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeals.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6442 

To amend section 101703 of title 54, United States Code, to include Tribal 

Governments and quasi-governmental entities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2022 

Mr. FULCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend section 101703 of title 54, United States Code, 

to include Tribal Governments and quasi-governmental 

entities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partnership Agree5 ments Creating Tangible Savings Act’’ or the ‘‘PACTS 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS. 

8 Section 101703 of title 54, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6442 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘agreement with a State or 

2 local government agency to provide for the co3 operative management of the Federal and State 

4 or local park areas where a System unit is lo5 cated adjacent to or near a State or local park 

6 area, and’’ and inserting ‘‘agreement with a 

7 State or local agency, Tribal Government, or 

8 quasi-governmental entity to provide for the co9 operative management of Federal, State, local, 

10 or Tribal park areas where’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘between the Service and 

12 a State or local government agency of a portion 

13 of either the System unit or State or local park 

14 will allow for more effective and efficient man15 agement of the System unit and State or local 

16 park’’ and inserting ‘‘between the Service and a 

17 State or local agency, Tribal Government, or 

18 quasi-governmental entity of a portion of either 

19 the System unit or State, local, Tribal, or 

20 quasi-governmental entity land will allow for 

21 more effective and efficient management of 

22 such System unit or such land’’; 

23 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘provide to a 

24 State’’ and all that follows through ‘‘land’’ and in25 serting ‘‘provide to a State or local agency, Tribal 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6442 IH

1 Government, or quasi-governmental entity goods and 

2 services to be used by the Secretary and the State 

3 or local agency, Tribal Government, or quasi-govern4 mental entity in the cooperative management of 

5 lands and waters’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (c)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘a Federal, State, or local 

8 employee for work on any Federal, State, or 

9 local’’ and inserting ‘‘an employee of a Federal, 

10 State, or local agency, Tribal Government, or 

11 quasi-governmental entity, for work on any 

12 Federal, State, local, Tribal, or quasi-govern13 mental entity land’’; and 

14 (B) by striking ‘‘by the Secretary and the 

15 State or local agency’’ and inserting ‘‘by the 

16 Secretary and the State or local agency, Tribal 

17 Government, or quasi-governmental entity’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                           2,901,908
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    615,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     24,395
<INVENTORY>                                                      459,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 4,041,183
<PP&E>                                                           26,248,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   9,257,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   22,556,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            1,126,013
<BONDS>                                                          3,134,936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      1,229
<COMMON>                                                         1,151,083
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     22,556,165
<SALES>                                                          1,197,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 1,218,840
<CGS>                                                            587,315  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    1,462,753  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 2,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 1,621,532
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               215,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (2,060,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (2,060,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (2,105,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 

 
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTI**,**David M. Gandossi, Chief Financial Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to Section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the*Securities Exchange Act of 1934*(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 9, 2005              /s/ David M. Gandossi   David M. Gandossi   Chief Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MercerInternational Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6489 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6489

   To prohibit the use of certain grants from being used to procure 
 unmanned aircraft systems manufactured by Chinese companies, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2022

 Mr. Graves of Louisiana (for himself and Mr. Moulton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of certain grants from being used to procure 
 unmanned aircraft systems manufactured by Chinese companies, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Infrastructure Grant Security Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACQUISITION OR OPERATION OF CHINESE MANUFACTURED 
              UAS USING SMART GRANT FUNDS.

    Section 25005(e)(3) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
(Public Law 117-58) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) to purchase, lease, or operate an unmanned 
                aircraft system (as defined in section 44801 of title 
                49, United States Code) manufactured by--
                            ``(i) an entity domiciled in the People's 
                        Republic of China; or
                            ``(ii) an entity, or a subsidiary or 
                        affiliate of an entity, that is subject to 
                        influence or control by--
                                    ``(I) the Government of the 
                                People's Republic of China; or
                                    ``(II) the Chinese Communist 
                                Party.''.
                                 <all>
```