alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         539,506
<SECURITIES>                                   267,844
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,178,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                   374,591
<INVENTORY>                                  3,902,732
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,294,434
<PP&E>                                       8,207,716
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,830,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,372,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,140,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,457,492
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,674,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,372,683
<SALES>                                     28,667,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,667,383
<CGS>                                       18,658,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,658,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,411,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,718
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,818,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                   616,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,201,535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,201,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ending October 28, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Tod A. Nestor, Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

 
| /s/  Tod A. Nestor                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Tod  A. Nestor                                     |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| May 14, 2008                             |

 

----
#### DAVIDSON v. RICHARD McCARTHY CO., Inc.

No. 16316.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 9, 1936.

James E. Courtin, of New Orleans, for appellant.

*505Spearing, McClendon, McCabe & Schmidt, of New Orleans, for appellee.

McCALEB, Judge.

On July 1, 1935, the district court entered its final judgment dismissing the plaintiffs suit. On the following day plaintiff applied for ahd obtained an order for a devolutive appeal to this court, the return day here being July 31, 1935.

In lieu of furnishing bond, the appellant was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis under the provisions of Act No. 156 of 1912, as amended by Act No. 260 of 1918, and by Act No. 165 of 1934 and was, therefore, not required to furnish an appeal bond.

In accordance with the provisions of Act No. 165 of 1934, the defendant and appel-lee filed, in the district court, a motion traversing the affidavits of the appellant upon which the order allowing him to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. This rule was continued from time to time and has never been disposed of.

The appellant failed to file the record in 'this court on the return day and no order was obtained for an extension of time.

The record was not filed here until December 3, 1935, and the appellee, on December 17, 1935, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is well founded. Lewis et al. v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans et al., 183 La. 724, 164 So. 780.

Appellant contends that the filing of the rule by the appellee in the trial court to test the affidavits, allowing appellant to proceed in forma pauperis, had the effect of staying further proceedings in the appellate court, and relieved him of the duty of filing his transcript until that pleading was disposed of. There is no merit in this contention. The law is well settled that once an appeal is taken and perfected by the filing of bond, the trial court is divested of jurisdiction except for the purpose of testing the surety on the bond. Mundy v. Phillips, 157 La. 445, 102 So. 519.

The allowance of the order of appeal in forma pauperis upon affidavits has the same effect of furnishing an appeal bond and the trial court is divested of jurisdiction except for the purpose of testing the truthfulness of the affidavits upon which the appeal in forma pauperis was allowed. See, Lewis et al. v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans et al., supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

Motion to dismiss appeal sustained.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Atwood Minerals and Mining Corp., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Greg Goldberg, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
February 24, 2010




/s/ Greg
      GoldbergGreg Goldberg,President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
      Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
                Secretary,
      and Treasurer
#### BERNARD v. ÆTNA LIFE INS. CO.

No. 1088.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 24, 1933.

St. Clair Adams, Jr., of New- Orleans, for appellant.

A. ‘ W. Dalferes, of Lafayette, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard by us at our last term in the parish of Iberia. It was our understanding at the time that proper parties, appellant and appellee, were before the court, but upon reaching the record for study and decision we find that such is not the case.

The, record contains an answer to the appeal, also an ex parte affidavit, signed by two parties, in which it is stated that Antheole Bernard, the original plaintiff and appellee, while the appeal was pending, had departed this life leaving a widow, Mrs. Leoeadie Bernard, née Zimmerman, and ten children, issue of his marriage with her, as his sole and only heirs, and an unsigned order, apparently intended .for the district court, recognizing them as such and making them parties plaintiffs and appellees.

The briefs in the record make no reference to the death of Antheole Bernard.

Taking the affidavit to be true, we have no appellee before the court. ■ Antheole Bernard is dead, but his widow and heirs have not been made parties and substituted as appellees in his place.

We have no specific rule on. the subject ourselves, hut are governed by those of the Supreme Court. The rule of the Supreme Court requires a sufficient showing of authority.

In this instance there is no showing that Antheole Bernard died intestate; that the legal community of ac-qu6ts and gains existed between himself and his widow at the time of his death; nor that all of his children have reached the age of majority. If any of his children are minors, then, in that case they should be provided with a representative appointed and qualified in the lower cpurt as the law directs.

The application to make parties appellees with documents showing sufficient authority are to be filed with the clerk of this court. The order making parties will be signed in chambers and upon which we will resume consideration of the appeal.
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 11
                              J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.
                            and Consolidated Subsidiaries

                      Computation of Net Income Per Common Share
                  _________________________________________________
                  (Amounts in millions except per common share data)





                                                   26 Weeks Ended
                                  _____________________________________________
                                      July 31, 1999           Aug. 1, 1998
                                  ______________________   ____________________
                                   Shares         Income    Shares      Income
                                  _________     ________   _______    _________

     Basic
     -----

     Net income                                  $   206                $   201
     Dividend on Series B ESOP
       convertible preferred stock
       (after-tax)                                   (18)                   (18)
                                                 _______                _______
     Adjusted net income                             188                   183

     Weighted average number of
       shares outstanding             258.2                252.9
                                      _____      _______   _____        _______
                                      258.2      $   188   252.9        $   183
                                      =====      =======   =====        =======


     Net income per common share                 $  0.73                $  0.73
                                                 =======                =======




     Diluted
     -------

     Net income                                  $   206                $   201
     Dividend on Series B ESOP
       convertible preferred stock
       (after-tax)                                   (18)                     -
     Assumed additional contribution
        to ESOP if preferred stock is
       fully converted                                 -                     (1)
                                                 -------                -------
     Adjusted net income                             188                    200

     Weighted average number of
       shares outstanding (basic)     258.2                252.9
     Dilutive common stock equivalents:
       Stock options and other
       dilutive effect                  0.6                  2.3
     Convertible preferred stock          -                 17.0
                                      _____      _______   _____        _______
                                      258.8      $   188   272.2        $   200
                                      =====      =======   =====        =======


     Net income per common share                 $  0.73                $  0.72
                                                 =======                =======
EX-34 (c)
EXHIBIT C

(logo) Grant Thornton

Accountants and Business Advisors


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage backed
securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment
provider on the underlying collateral (the "Platform") as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and
1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Irvine, CA
February 20, 2007


18400 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92612-0525
T 949.553.1600
F 949.553.0168
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US member of Grant Thornton International
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Amendment of 2013 Stock Incentive Plan on Reduction of Share Reserve 

On or about March 19, 2014, the Board of Directors of Sangamo BioSciences, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the following resolutions relating to
the reduction of share reserves under the Company’s 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan: 
 “Reduction of
Reserves under Stock Incentive Plan and ESPP 
 WHEREAS, that the Company has filed a definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on April 21, 2014 (the “2014 Annual Meeting”), which includes a proposal requesting stockholder approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(the “Charter”) to increase of the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 80,000,000 shares to 160,000,000 shares (the “Charter Proposal”); 

WHEREAS, to ensure that the Company has sufficient number of authorized shares of Common Stock under the Charter to complete the Offering prior to the
approval of the Charter Proposal at the 2014 Annual Meeting, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders to temporarily reduce the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under the Company’s
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) and 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) for a period beginning on the pricing date of the Offering and ending on the earlier of (i) effective date of the
amendment to the Charter following the stockholder approval of the Charter Proposal at the 2014 Annual Meeting and (ii) the effective date of any amendment to the Charter other than the amendment covered by the Charter Proposal to increase the
number of authorized shares of Common Stock (the “Reduction Period”). 
 RESOLVED, that the Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended
to reduce its share reserve by 2,505,119 shares of Common Stock from 14,097,808 shares to 11,592,689 shares and that the ESPP is hereby amended to reduce its share reserve by 1,167,763 shares of Common Stock from 2,100,000 shares to 932,237 shares,
with each such reduction to be effective only during the Reduction Period; upon the expiration of the Reduction Period the number of shares reserved under the Stock Incentive Plan and the ESPP shall automatically be returned to the number of shares
of Common Stock reserved under each such plan immediately prior the pricing date of the Offering (as adjusted pursuant to Section III. B of the ESPP and Article I, Section V.F. of the Stock Incentive Plan).”
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RAAC SERIES 2006-SP2 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Executive Vice President
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-15CB
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-15CB


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### Ex Parte Herman East.

No. 24705.

January 11, 1950.

*C. S. Farmer,*Waco, for relator.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Relator is confined in the penitentiary under life sentence for robbery by assault pronounced against him in the 77th District Court of Limestone County, Texas, on July 5, 1944.

Application for writ of habeas corpus was made to the judge of that court in this proceeding; and, after a hearing, the writ was issued returnable to this court, as provided by Art. 119, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P.

The judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court, a jury being waived, assessed the punishment at “confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than five years, nor more than his natural life.” The judgment is neither definite nor certain as to the punishment assessed, and for such reason is void. See Ex Parte Traxler, 147 Tex. Cr. R. 661, 184 S. W. 2d 286; and Edwards v. State, 153 Texas Crim. Rep. 301, 219 S. W. 2d 1022.

It is ordered that relator be relieved from further confinement in the penitentiary, and that he be delivered by the penitentiary authorities to the sheriff of Limestone County to answer in the 77th District Court of such county to the indictment in said cause under which his conviction was had.

Opinion approved by the court.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with this Annual Report of Red Trail Energy, LLC (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Klimpel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  March
31, 2009


/s/
      Mark E. KlimpelMark
      E. KlimpelChief
      Financial Officer