alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Charles E. Kamps, Defendant.

County Court, Suffolk County,

November 27, 1956.

*519
      *James D. C. Murray*for defendant.

*George W. Percy, Jr., District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

Fred J. Munder, J.

The indictment against the defendant charges in five separate counts, burglary in the second degree, assault in the second degree, attempted rape in the first degree, robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree. The defendant moves for a bill of particulars asking complete and exact details of all of his alleged acts. The prosecution claims there was a single incident during which all the alleged crimes were committed. The defense claims mistaken identity and indicates an alibi defense.

Because a simplified indictment was used the defendant is entitled at least to the bill of particulars required by section 295-h of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He asks, however, for exact details as to the date, time and place of the alleged crimes. Because the defense is an alibi *(People*v. *Wright,*172 Misc. 860) he should be furnished the exact date of the alleged occurrences, as well as an accurate location description of the place, including the street and house number if the place has one. The times of the alleged acts should be approximated within a reasonable degree of exactitude and the name of the injured person should be supplied.

No more exact particulars will be required to be furnished as to the items in the demand lettered “ A ”, “ B ” and “ D ”, nor any more particulars than those required by section 295-h of the Code of Criminal Procedure in response to items lettered *“ G ”*and “ F ”. The item lettered *“*E ” calls for evidence which need not be supplied.

On the argument of this motion the District Attorney asked for a bill of particulars from the defendant on the alibi. This will not be directed or required unless the District Attorney serves the notice required by section 295-l of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Submit order.
EXHIBIT 10.3

                            nStor Technologies, Inc.
                              100 Century Boulevard
                            West Palm Beach, FL 33417



May 31, 2003



Cenvill Recreation, Inc.
100 Century Blvd
West Palm Beach, FL 33417
Attn:   Mark F. Levy


Dear Mr. Levy:

We have agreed to the  following  amendments  to that certain  Promissory  Note,
dated December 30, 2002, in the amount of $560,000.00  (the "Note"),  payable by
nStor  Technologies,  Inc.  to  Cenvill  Recreation,  Inc.,  a copy of  which is
attached hereto.

          1)   The  maturity  date of the Note is hereby  extended  from May 31,
               2003 to December 31, 2003 ("Maturity").

          2)   Accrued and unpaid  interest on the Note from  December  30, 2002
               through Maturity at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum will
               accrue  on the  unpaid  balance  of the  Note and be  payable  at
               Maturity.

Except as set forth in this  letter,  the Note  remains  unmodified  and in full
force and effect.

Please indicate your concurrence with the foregoing.

Sincerely,
                                                        Cenvill Recreation, Inc.
/s/ Jack Jaiven                                         Agreed:
                                                        By: /s/ Mark F. Levy
Jack Jaiven                                                     Mark F. Levy
Vice President and Treasurer                                    President
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1397-000]


Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC; Notice of Filing

August 21, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 13, 2008, ISO Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC 
filed a petition for acceptance of initial tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, waivers of certain Commission regulations and certain blanket 
authority, pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act (FPA) 16 
U.S.C. 824d (2000), Rule 205 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 
CFR 385.205 (2008), and Part 35 of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 
Part 35 (2008), as amended by Order Nos. 697 and 697-A, Market Based 
Rates for Wholesale Sales of Electric, Capacity and Ancillary Services, 
Order No. 697, 119 FERC ] 61,295 (2007), order on clarification, 121 
FERC ] 61,260 (2007), reh'g, Order No. 697-A, 123 FERC ] 61,055 (2008), 
reh'g pending (Order 697).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#783e3d2a3b37161411161d2b0d0808170a0c381e1d0a1b561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b1d1e091814353732353e082e2b2b34292f1b3d3e2938753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 3, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19930 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Presidential Documents

50695 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 167 

Wednesday, August 27, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8278 of August 22, 2008 

Women’s Equality Day, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

With vision and determination, American women have helped build our 

great Nation. On Women’s Equality Day, we remember the dedication of 

women who overcame many obstacles in order to secure the right to vote. 

The struggle for women’s rights is a story of strong women willing to 

take the lead and pave the way toward equal voting rights for all American 

citizens. In 1848, a group of determined women came together in Seneca 

Falls, New York, to proclaim that ‘‘all men and women are created equal,’’ 

and demand suffrage. On August 26, 1920, their voices were finally heard, 

and the 19th Amendment to the Constitution guaranteed women the right 

to vote. 

As we look back on the journey to women gaining suffrage, we remember 

the sacrifices of people like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. 

More than 160 years after the Seneca Falls Convention, we celebrate the 

spirit, leadership, and hard work of those pioneering women. We also recognize the women who continue in this tradition by acting as role models 

in their communities, helping raise the next generation of Americans, leading 

in their professions, and serving in the Armed Forces protecting our country. 

These women are continuing on the path set by those who came before 

them, so that all Americans can realize the great promise of our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 26, 2008, as 

Women’s Equality Day. I call upon the people of the United States to 

celebrate the achievements of women and observe this day with appropriate 

programs and activities. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
50696 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 27, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second 

day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtythird. 

[FR Doc. E8–20079 

Filed 8–26–08; 9:33 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
**EXHIBIT 31(a)****RULE 13a — 14(a)/15d — 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Sherrill Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peerless Mfg. Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.                                                        /s/ Sherrill Stone   Sherrill Stone  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 14, 2005
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00133-CV

ANTHONY DELEON, Appellant

V.

ANGELA VILLAREAL AND ROBERT 

MILLER, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court

of Tarrant County (352-303932-18)

January 9, 2020

Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Anthony Deleon shall pay all of the costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 10.146









 ASSIGNMENT
OF MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT







Parties
to this Assignment Agreement




The
parties to this Assignment
Agreement are:




Century
Casinos, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Century” hereinafter);




Focus
Casino Consulting AG (“FCC” hereinafter), a Swiss corporation; and




Century
Resorts International
Ltd.
(“CRI”
hereinafter), a Mauritius corporation and a 100% subsidiary of
Century.







WITNESSETH
THAT:




WHEREAS,
Century and FCC have entered into a Management Agreement (“Agreement”
hereinafter) in March 2001, with amendments entered into on October 11, 2001;
and October 12, 2002; and March 29, 2004; and 




WHEREAS,
CRI is a subsidiary company of Century; and




WHEREAS,
both Century and FCC desire to assign this Agreement from
Century to
CRI.




NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises herein
contained, and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be
legally bound, agree as follows:




 


	1.  	
      Assignment







The
Agreement is assigned in all respects, with all rights and obligations, from
Century to CRI. CRI accepts this assignment.





	2.  	
      Guarantee







CRI will
invoice Century, and Century will compensate CRI, for that portion of services
under the Agreement that have been respectively will be performed by FCC for
Century. Further, Century guarantees to CRI and FCC that it will reimburse
and
guarantee for CRI, in
case CRI should not be able to fulfill any of
its
obligations from this assignment.





	3.  	
      Date
      of Assignment and Effective Date







The date
of this assignment shall be the date of the last signature. The date this
assignment becomes effective in all respects shall be January 1,
2005







IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Century, CRI and FCC have duly executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written. 





	 	
      FOR
      CENTURY RESORTS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
	 
	 	 	 
	 	
      By:
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 //s// Richard Arlove	 February 23, 2005 
	 	
      Mr.
      Richard Arlove, Director 
	
      Date

	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 //s// Vony Ramsamy	 February 23, 2005
	 	
      Mr.
      Vony Ramsamy, Director 
	
      Date

	 	 	 
	 	
      FOR
      FLYFISH CASINO CONSULTING AG:
	 
	 	 	 
	 	
      By:
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 //s// Werner Stocker	 February 15, 2005
	 	
      Mr.
      Werner Stocker, Verwaltungsrat 
	
      Date

	 	 	 
	 	
      FOR
      CENTURY CASINOS, INC.: 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	
      By:
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 //s// Robert S. Eichberg	 February 14, 2005
	 	
      Robert
      S. Eichberg, Director 
	
      Date

	 	 	 
	 	
      By:
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 //s// Gottfried Schellmann	 February 23, 2005
	 	
      Mag.
      Gottfried Schellmann 
	
      Date

	 	
      Director
      and Member of 
	 
	 	
      Compensation
      Committee 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	
      By:
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 //s// Dinah Corbaci	 February 15, 2005
	 	
      Dr.
      Dinah Corbaci, Director 
	
      Date

	 	
      and
      Member of
	 
	 	
      Compensation
      Committee
Exhibit 10(a)


 


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM 


 


We consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 128 to Registration Statement No.
333-142592 on Form N-1A of our report dated February 25, 2014, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of
BlackRock Emerging Markets Flexible Dynamic Bond Portfolio (formerly BlackRock Emerging Market Local Debt Portfolio) and BlackRock
Strategic Income Opportunities Portfolio, each a series of BlackRock Funds II, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of
BlackRock Funds II, for the year ended December 31, 2013, and to the references to
us under the headings “Financial Highlights” and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the
Prospectus and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Financial Statements” in the Statement
of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.


 


	 
	/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
	April 28, 2014


 



    	 



    	 



    




 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM 


 


We consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 128 to Registration Statement No. 333-142592 on Form N-1A of our report dated
February 24, 2014, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock World Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”),
appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of the Fund for the year ended December 31, 2013, and to the references to us under
the headings “Financial Highlights” and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Prospectus,
which is part of such Registration Statement.


	 
	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
	Boston, Massachusetts
	April 28, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MANUEL CARRASCOESCOBAR,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71015

Agency No. A205-526-495

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Manuel Carrasco-Escobar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of

removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

FILED

NOV 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
questions of law and claims of due process violations. Mohammed v. Gonzales,

400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review.

The agency did not err or violate due process by pretermitting CarrascoEscobar’s application for cancellation of removal, where he lacked any qualifying

relatives at the time of his final removal hearing. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1)(D),

1101(b)(1); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (petitioner must show

error and prejudice to establish a due process violation); De Mercado v. Mukasey,

566 F.3d 810, 816 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[N]o authority . . . suggest[s] that the

Constitution provides . . . a fundamental right to reside in the United States simply

because other [family members] are citizens or lawful permanent residents.”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Carrasco-Escobar’s unexhausted contention

regarding the preservation of his son’s status as a qualifying relative. See Tijani v.

Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to

consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before

the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 15-71015
#### Emily E. Hunter, Respondent, v. Eli M. Upton, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-039
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
#### Ronald R. MOWER, Named as Ronald Mower (No middle initial); Terry Klooster; Kenneth Sandy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. E.A. WESTFALL, also known as Penny Westfall; Darwin E. Chapman, Sued as: Darwin Chapman (No middle initial); Iowa Department of Public Safety, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1207.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

*799Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and LOKEN Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

After review of the overall record, the opinion of the District Court, and the briefs filed on appeal in this court, we affirm the judgment based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court.

*See*8th Cir. R. 47(b).

A true copy.