alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

DEANDRE DERRICK MEIGHAN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30008 

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00008-WFN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Deandre Derrick Meighan appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 100-month concurrent sentences imposed following his guilty-plea 

convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a 

controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-30008 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meighan’s counsel has filed 

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw 

as counsel of record. We have provided Meighan the opportunity to file a pro se 

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been 

filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11376  and  #11377]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of  Pennsylvania dated: 08/15/2008. *Incident:*
                         Apartment Building Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         07/11/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         08/15/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/14/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/15/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Allegheny. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Washington, Westmoreland. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.375Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.687Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11376 5 and for economic injury is 11377 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration number are Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated:  August 15, 2008. Jovita Carranza, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. E8-19379 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Ahoto Taysir MULAZIM, a/k/a Harold Carpenter, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Kevin Canada; Jason Hillyard; Antonio Johnson; Khalid Muhammad, a/k/a Antonio Waddler; Lonnie McDonovan Gholson; Christopher Tinker; Arthur D. Newby; Damieon Carter; Dennis Boyd, Plaintiffs, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE; Gene M. Johnson; Linda Shear, Head Dietician, Virginia Department of Corrections; Dan Braxton, Chief Warden; John Armentrout, Assistant Warden of Operations, Red Onion; R.W. Fleming, Chief of Security, Red Onion; Institutional Investigator Yates; L. Mullins, Treatment Program Supervisor, Red Onion; V. Phipps, Director of Nursing, Red Onion; D. McKnight; P. Saul, Human Rights Advocate, Red Onion; A. Fleenor, Human Rights Advocate, Red Onion; Richard A. Young, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-7174.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 14, 2002.

Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Ahoto Taysir Mulazim appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). Because Mulazim may cure any deficiency by filing an amended complaint, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the judgment is not a final, appealable order. *See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19946]



[[Page 50825]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Centers for Birth Defects Research and 
Prevention, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) DD09-001

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 9 a.m.-2 p.m., October 7, 2008 (Closed).
    Place: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Global 
Communications Center, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Atlanta, GA 30333, 
404-639-3138.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
``Centers for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, FOA DD09-001.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Susan Stanton, D.D.S., 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 
1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D74, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 
404-639-4640.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: August 22, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-19946 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### FIRST NAT. BANK OF VILLE PLATTE v. COREIL et al.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 7, 1933.

Guillory & Guillory, of Yille Platte, and L. A. Fontenot, of Opelousas, for appellant.

Dubuisson & Dubuisson, of Opelousas, for appellees.

MOUTON, Judge.

Plaintiff Bank and third opponent Armand Coreil are each applying for a rehearing in this ease.

The property seized by the bank had been adjudicated at public auction to Mrs. J. M. Coreil, which she refused to take for the reasons stated in our opinion.

The property had been seized as a community asset several months after the adjudication. Two days after the seizure had been effected, the procés verbal of the auction sale-was filed for registry, and in which it appeared that the name of Armand Coreil, third opponent, had been substituted as adjudicatee of the property for that of Mrs. J. M. Coreil, original adjudicatee.

On this feature iof the case, we said: “Plenee, at the time of the seizure the bank had no reason to believe that the property was not an asset of the community existing between Mr. and Mrs. J. M. Coreil.” 145 So. 393, 395.

This was obviously true, as the seizure by the bank had preceded the change of the name of the adjudicatee to that of Armand Coreil, third opponent, as appeared when the procés verbal was recorded.

*480Counsel for third opponent in their application for a rehearing concede that the bank when the seizure was made could have honestly believed then that Mrs. Coreil had complied with her bid and have been free of blame, but say that two days after, .when the auctioneer filed his procés verbal and was apprised of its error, compelled the third opponent to battle for his property in two courts and should be held liable for attorney’s fees.

It appeared in the evidence, as we remarked in our original opinion, that the property seized was in the possession of Mr. and Mrs. J. M. Coreil at the time it was bid in by her at the public sale, and that at the time of the trial of this case they were still living on the property.

In our opinion we refused the attorney’s fees claimed on the following expression of the court, in Soniat v. Whitmer, 141 La. 235, 74 So. 916, 919, relied upon by counsel *ton*applicant, quoting: “There may be cases with extenuating circumstances which would relieve a seizing creditor from actual damages when the property of a third person is illegally seized.”

The changing of the name of the adjudi-catee after the bank had made the seizure and Mrs. J. M. Coreil, the original adjudieatee, being on the property seized at that time which was still in her possession up to the time of the trial, presented such a situation that the bank is not to be blamed if it battled with third opponent for the maintenance of its seizure.

The facts, above referred to, created “extenuating circumstances” which should relieve the bank from actual damages for its seizure of the property of a third person, under the ruling in the case hereinabove cited.

The rehearing asked for by third opponent is therefore refused; and the rehearing applied for by the bank is also denied and refused.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6500-6501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8524-3]


Notice of Open Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory 
Board (EFAB)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA's EFAB will hold an open meeting of the full board in 
Washington, DC on March 10-11, 2008. EFAB is an EPA advisory committee 
chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to provide 
advice and recommendations to EPA on creative approaches to funding 
environmental programs, projects, and activities.
    The purpose of this meeting is to hear from informed speakers on

[[Page 6501]]

environmental finance issues, proposed legislation, Agency priorities, 
and to discuss progress with work products under EFAB's current 
Strategic Action Agenda.
    Environmental financing topics expected to be discussed include: 
Financial Assurance Mechanisms (Commercial Insurance & Cost 
Estimation), Environmental Management Systems, Public-Private 
Partnerships, Sustainable Watershed Financing, Innovative Financing 
Tools, and Leveraging the State Revolving Loan Funds.
    This meeting is open to the public, however, seating is limited. 
All members of the public who plan to attend the meeting must register 
in advance, no later than Friday, February 29, 2008.

DATES: Full Board Meeting is scheduled for March 10, 2008 from 1 p.m.-5 
p.m. and March 11, 2008 from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The American Institute of Architects, 1735 New York Ave., 
NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Registration and Information Contact

    To register for this meeting or get further information, please 
contact Alecia Crichlow, EPA, at (202) 564-5188 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5c4d565c57535048115e535a5c565e7f5a4f5e11585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7a4b5aea4afaba8b0e9a6aba2a4aea687a2b7a6e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>. For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Alecia Crichlow. To 
request accommodations for a disability, contact Alecia Crichlow, 
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much 
time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: January 23, 2008.
Terry Ouverson,
Acting Director, Office of Enterprise Technology & Innovation.
 [FR Doc. E8-1955 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          30,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    171,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,600
<PP&E>                                         232,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 909,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,300
<BONDS>                                        241,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   909,300
<SALES>                                        315,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,600
<CGS>                                          245,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Lyle Douglas ROBISON, Defendant— Appellant.

No. 01-30412. D.C. No. CR-99-00052-DWM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Before TROTT, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Any error committed by the district court on remand for re-sentencing was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.1 Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. *See Heder v. United States,*527 U.S. 1, 15, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999).
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Dawn Hammond, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-AC3
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., as Servicer, Chevy Chase Bank,
     F.S.B., as Servicer, CitiMortgage, Inc., as Servicer, EMC Mortgage
     Corporation, as Servicer, EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Named Servicer,
     Harborside Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, HomEq Servicing Corporation,
     as Sub-Servicer, National City Mortgage Co., as Servicer, Union Federal
     Bank of Indianapolis, as Named Servicer, Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, as
     Servicer and Waterfield Mortgage Company, Incorporated, as Sub-Servicer.

     Dated: July 10, 2008

     /s/ Dawn Hammond
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
     servicer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,952
<OTHER-SE>                                     351,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,002
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6609 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6609

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from using facial recognition 
   technology to access any Internal Revenue Service online account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2022

 Mr. Huizenga introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from using facial recognition 
   technology to access any Internal Revenue Service online account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Facial Authorization Cannot be 
Enforced Act'' or the ``FACE Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FACIAL RECOGNITION FOR ACCESS TO INTERNAL 
              REVENUE SERVICE ACCOUNTS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury may not establish or maintain any 
verification process for access to an Internal Revenue Service online 
account using facial recognition technology.
                                 <all>
```