alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matthew Hutchins, Chief Financial and Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IBroadband, Inc.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.

Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



d.

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



e.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;



6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:   January 14, 2008



By:

/s/ Matthew Hutchins







Chief Financial and Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET,
AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,888
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         14
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             726
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           343
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,161
<COMMON>                                         1,072
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               (131)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               968
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      205
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,967
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,161
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,235
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                75
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,029
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,104
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            128
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   2
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     133
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            45
<NET-INCOME>                                        88
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          2
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       86
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           100
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             408
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Legacy Reserves LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC (the “Company”), the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


/s/ Cary D. BrownCary D. BrownChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardMarch 4, 2011


/s/ Steven H. PruettSteven H. PruettPresident, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryMarch 4, 2011


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.




---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19949]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW159737]


Wyoming: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and 
Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from Sun Cal Energy, Inc. for competitive 
oil and gas lease WYW159737 for land in Sublette County, Wyoming. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre, or 
fraction thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to 
reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. 
The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease 
as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act 
of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing 
to reinstate lease WYW159737 effective February 1, 2008, under the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting 
the lands.

Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. E8-19949 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe &Jack (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending August 2,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”),

 

I,Raymond L. Arthur, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(i)            The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:   September 10, 2008 | by: /s/  Raymond L. Arthur                             |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Raymond L.  Arthur                                     |
|                                 | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
214 La. 535

#### STATE v. JOHNSON.

No. 39115.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1948.

Campbell & Padgett, of Bossier City, for defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen. and A. M. Wallace, Dist. Atty., of Benton, for ap-pellee.

McCALEB, Justice.

Earl Johnson was indicted, tried and convicted for attempted manslaughter. Prior to sentence, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment based on the ground that he had not been charged with a crime in the manner provided by law. The judge overruled the motion and sentenced him to three years at hard labor in the penitentiary. He has appealed.

The only question presented for consideration is whether the indictment is fatally defective. It charges, in substance, that appellant “attempted unlawfully to kill S„ M. Morgan Jr.” Counsel for appellant asserts that, in order for the crime of attempted manslaughter to be charged in the form permitted by Article 235 of the Code of Criminal Procedlure, the indictment should have alleged that appellant “attempted to unlawfully kill S. M. Morgan, Jr.” This contention is founded upon the premise that, since Article 235 sets forth that the short form for manslaughter is “A. B. unlawfully killed C. D.”, the offense of attempted manslaughter should be charged “A. B. attempted to unlawfrtlly kill C. D.” in order to comply with the form indicated for attempts.

We agree with the trial judge that there is no substantial difference between the averment that appellant “attempted unlawfully to kill” and that he “attempted to unlawfully kill” as it is clear that, in either case, he is fully advised of the nature and cause of the accusation against him. If the indictment be defective (which we doubt), it is merely a formal defect which cannot be considered on a motion in arrest of judgment, see Articles 517 and 518 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, objection thereto should have been raised by demurrer or motion to quash in advance of trial.

Article 252 of the Code of Criminal Procedure declares:

> “No indictment shall be quashed, set aside or dismissed for any one or more of the following defects: * * * (Third) That any uncertainty exists therein. * * * If the court be of the opinion that the third defect exists in any indictment, it may order that the indictment be amended to cure such defect.”

*163Article 253 provides, in part:

> “No indictment shall be quashed, set aside or dismissed or motion to quash be sustained or any motion for delay of sentence for the purpose of review be granted, nor shall any conviction be set aside or reversed on account of any defect in form •or substance of the indictment, unless the objection to such indictment, specifically •stating the defect claimed, be made prior to the commencement of the trial or at such time thereafter as the court in its discretion permit. * * * ”

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                               FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAY-4-1997
<CASH>                                                         3,734,654
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  9,071,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     841,588
<INVENTORY>                                                    8,113,141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              28,100,125
<PP&E>                                                       114,987,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                                56,709,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               151,307,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         48,300,492
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                       1,534,986
<OTHER-SE>                                                    35,161,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 151,307,709
<SALES>                                                       58,691,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              58,691,809
<CGS>                                                         45,000,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 45,000,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1,619,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,439,356
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     796,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              643,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     643,326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.08
        



</TABLE>
#### H.G. DAVIS, Appellant, v. John Wayne CARTER, Judge, one and all; Faulkner County Quorum Court, one and all; H.G. Foster, Prosecuting Attorney, one and all; Marty Montgomery, Sheriff, originally sued as Monty Montgomery, Appellees.

No. 03-1412.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 2003.

Decided Aug. 6, 2003.

Before BOWMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

H.G. Davis appeals the adverse entry of final judgment by the District Court1 in his civil rights lawsuit, wherein he claimed due process and equal protection violations based on allegations that the defendant county officials and entity took various wrongful actions with regard to property on which he resides. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that (1) to the extent the ruling is properly before us, the dismissal of claims against the county prosecutor was correct; (2) the grant of summary judgment to the remaining defendants was also correct; and (3) an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Davis’s request for injunctive relief pending appeal as moot.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
NUMBER 13-10-00436-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PATRICIA GOMEZ MONROY, Appellant,

v.

MARIA DE LOS ANGELES DOMIT, ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

O R D E R 

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on December 21, 2011, due to the 

bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally TEX.

R. APP. P. 8. On March 21, 2013, this Court issued an order requesting the status of the 

appeal. In response, the parties requested the appeal remain abated. Since that time, 

there has been no activity in this appeal. 
2

The Court hereby orders the parties to file, within fourteen days of the date of this 

order, an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to 

reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. 

Failure to respond to this order will result in reinstatement and dismissal of the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

8th day of May, 2014.
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 99


      ST. LOUIS, June 2, 1997 -- Petrolite Corporation (NASDAQ:PLIT) has
announced that its annual meeting of stockholders and a vote on the company's
pending acquisition by Baker Hughes Incorporated (BHI - NYSE, PSE and EBS)
will be held on Tuesday, July 1, 1997, at 11:00 a.m. at the Doubletree Hotel
& Conference Center, located at 16625 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield,
Mo.

      Pending favorable votes by Petrolite shareholders at the annual
meeting, the proposed acquisition by Baker Hughes is expected to close on
Wednesday, July 2, 1997.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1437
ARTHUR EMIL LARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION; CHARLES CAPE, in his capacities as Chief of the SouthCarolina Real Estate Commission(s) Investigative Division and Staff Involved; CHARLES CAPE, Personally, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-97-1323-3-19BC) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Emil Larson, Appellant Pro Se. Arrigo Paul Carotti, MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Arthur Larson appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action as barred by the statute of limitations period. See Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. , 828 F.2d211, 220 (4th Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Larson v. South Carolina Real Estate Comm'n , No. CA-97-1323-3-19BC (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,175
<PP&E>                                             826
<DEPRECIATION>                                     453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           848
<OTHER-SE>                                         563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,925
<SALES>                                             90
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   116
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (93)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (93)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (93)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>