alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>

                                                                    Exhibit 27

        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
        SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000110101
<NAME>  NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   202,625
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      22
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       38,641
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      3,786
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               20,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              265,955
<COMMON>                                     24,757
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          73,588
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               98,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         69,734
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                         0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                7,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                         0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                  0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               90,276
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               265,955
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    47,261
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   38,964
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   38,964
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       8,297
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               40
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                8,337
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,303
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          2,723
<NET-INCOME>                                  4,311
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 4,311
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      5,004
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                     1,134
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       (7,131)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO 

COMMITTEE ON RULES OF 

EVIDENCE 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 651

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2014, John P. Krill, Jr., Esquire, 

Dauphin County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee on Rules of 

Evidence for a term expiring October 1, 2017.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1437

ARTHUR EMIL LARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION; CHARLES

CAPE, in his capacities as Chief of the South

Carolina Real Estate Commission(s) Investigative Division and Staff Involved; CHARLES

CAPE, Personally,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-97-1323-3-19BC)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 27, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Emil Larson, Appellant Pro Se. Arrigo Paul Carotti,

MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Larson appeals the district court's order dismissing

his civil action as barred by the statute of limitations period.

See Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 828 F.2d

211, 220 (4th Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Larson v. South Carolina Real

Estate Comm'n, No. CA-97-1323-3-19BC (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF the ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS and the Diocese of the Protestant Episcopal Church in Louisiana, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW ORLEANS LAKE SHORE LAND COMPANY, in Receivership, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 75-2218.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 1976.

*185Otto B. Schoenfeld, New Orleans, La., for Roman Catholic Church.

Joseph V. Bologna, New Orleans, La., for Protestant Episcopal.

David Stone, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before RIVES, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A federal equity receivership was appointed in 1918 to sell the assets of the New Orleans Lake Shore Land Company and to pay off its creditors. That having been accomplished, the receivership was discharged in 1930. In 1966, a surveyor asserted that due to a faulty map valuable land actually belonging to the land company had never been collected and disbursed. He brought a receivership action in state court on behalf of creditors and shareholders of the dormant land company. The Archdiocese of the Catholic Church and the Diocese of the Episcopal Church were among the many adverse claimants to the land in question. They attempted to defend by asserting exclusive federal jurisdiction to administer any holdings of the land company, even though the federal equity receivership had been dismissed 45 years earlier. The state court refused the defendants’ motion to remove to federal court. Next the federal district court dismissed defendants’ request that.it restrain the state court’s receiver from taking any additional steps. This appeal was brought from the dismissal of defendants’ complaint.

We agree with the district court’s holding that the discharge of the federal receivership in 1930 was final. Appellants claim that the federal equity receivership was similar to a bankruptcy proceeding and therefore the federal court’s jurisdiction should be reopened to the exclusion of state court jurisdiction over the newly discovered assets. We cannot agree. The earlier proceeding was clearly an equity receivership and not a bankruptcy proceeding. Because the discharge of the receiver in 1930 was final, the federal court has no continuing jurisdiction, and we may not interfere with a pending state proceeding.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ W. Kirk BrassfieldW. Kirk BrassfieldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6303 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the administration of 

the TRICARE program in Puerto Rico, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N (for herself and Mrs. MURPHY of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the 

administration of the TRICARE program in Puerto Rico, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Equality 

5 Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION 

7 OF TRICARE PROGRAM IN PUERTO RICO. 

8 (a) IMPROVEMENTS.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United 

9 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1076f 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6303 IH

1 the following new section (and conforming the table of sec2 tions at the beginning of such chapter accordingly): 

3 ‘‘§ 1076g. TRICARE program: administration in Puer4 to Rico 

5 ‘‘(a) AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME.—In desig6 nating geographical areas under section 1097(b)(3) of this 

7 title, the Secretary of Defense shall designate such areas 

8 in Puerto Rico in a similar manner used to designate such 

9 areas in the 50 States. 

10 ‘‘(b) EXPANSION OF TRAVEL BENEFITS.—(1) In pro11 viding travel and transportation allowances under section 

12 1074i of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure 

13 that individuals located in Puerto Rico who, but for such 

14 location, would be eligible to receive such allowances pur15 suant to such section are eligible to receive such allow16 ances. 

17 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may revise the regulations pre18 scribed under section 464 of title 37, or prescribe such 

19 new regulations, as may be necessary for the administra20 tion of paragraph (1). 

21 ‘‘(c) HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE.—The Di22 rector of the Federal Electronic Health Record Moderniza23 tion Office shall coordinate with the Director of the De24 partment of Health of Puerto Rico for the purpose of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6303 IH

1 sharing health information through the Joint Health In2 formation Exchange, or such successor initiative. 

3 ‘‘(d) FEDERAL ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD MOD4 ERNIZATION OFFICE.—In this section, the term ‘Federal 

5 Electronic Health Record Modernization Office’ means the 

6 Office established under section 1635(b) of the Wounded 

7 Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 

8 1071 note).’’. 

9 (b) SUNSET.—Section 1076g of title 10, United 

10 States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall be repealed 

11 on the date that is two years after the date on which Puer12 to Rico is declared to be a State of the United States of 

13 America and is admitted to the Union on equal footing 

14 with the other States in all respects. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10(a)

FIRM TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT

This AGREEMENT, entered into as of the 1st day of September 2003, by and between Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as "NICOR Gas" or "Nicor Gas", and North Shore Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as "North Shore".

Witnesseth:

Whereas, Nicor Gas is a public utility subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Illinois Commerce Commission under the Illinois Public Utilities Act; and

Whereas, North Shore is a public utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois Commerce Commission under the Illinois Public Utilities Act; and

Whereas, North Shore desires to effectuate transportation service for general system supply deliveries; and

Whereas, Nicor Gas currently owns, operates and maintains certain natural gas transmission facilities which could be used to transport natural gas within the state of Illinois from the facilities of ANR Pipeline Company ("ANR") near Hampshire, Illinois to the facilities of North Shore; and

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the premises of the mutual agreements hereinafter set forth, Nicor Gas and North Shore agree as follows:

Article I. Definitions
Exhibit 4.1






COPYRIGHT. 1930. BY


DWIGHT & M. H. JACKSON


CHICAGO


PATENT PENDING


JT 1334


NUMBER 


SHARES 


CUSIP Y7388L 12 9


SAFE BULKERS, INC.


A CORPORATION FORMED UNDER THE LAWS OF REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL
ISLANDS


This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and
shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Restated Articles of incorporation of the Corporation, and all amendments
thereto, copies of which are on file with the Transfer Agent, to all of which the holder hereof by the acceptance of this Certificate
assents. The shares represented by this Certificate have limited voting rights.


This Certifies That is the owner of  full
paid and non-assessable 8.00% SERIES C CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED SHARES, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE transferable
on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its duly authorized officers and sealed with the Seal of the Corporation,


this ______ day of _____ A.D. ____


Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


President & Secretary


Countersigned and Registered: American Stock Transfer Agent &
Registrar Transfer & Trust Company, LLC(New York, NY By ________ Authorized Signatory


DWIGHT & M. H. JACKSON


205 W. RANDOLPH STREET


DIV OF


CORPORATION SUPPLY CO.


CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606



    	 



    	



    







For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Shares on
the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated


In presence of


The Corporation will furnish any stockholder upon request without
charge a statement of the powers, designations, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions of
such preferences and rights, of all classes and series of stock of the Corporation.


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE
NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


THIS SPACE IS NOT TO BE COVERED IN ANY WAY
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6221 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, 

as the ‘‘James A. Rogers Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6221 RDS

1 SECTION 1. JAMES A. ROGERS JR. POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 155 Main Avenue West in 

4 Winsted, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘James A. Rogers Jr. Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James A. Rogers Jr. 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
224 La. 830

#### STATE v. JACKSON.

No. 41554.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 15, 1954.

Goodwyn H. Harris, Jr., Mansfield, for appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culli-gan, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Reuel Boone, Dist. Atty., Many, and Jack E. Burgess, Asst. Dist. Atty., Mansfield, for appellee.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Appellant Bernice .Jackson, charged in'a bill of information with possessing and keeping for sale intoxicating liquors containing more than 6 per cent alcohol by volume for beverage purposes in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana, contrary to an ordinance of the police jury of that parish, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment for six months. From this conviction and sentence she has appealed to this court. Since appellant was tried for a misdemean- or and sentenced to a term of imprisonment which does not 'exceed six months, this court is without appellate jurisdiction under the provisions of Article 7, Section 10, of our 'Constitution.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal of the defendant Bernice Jackson is dismissed.
#### Charles Ballance, Pltff in Error, *v.*Alfred G. Curtenius *et al.,*Defts in Error.

ERROR TO PEORIA.

The ruling of the Court in the case of Spellman *v.*Curtenius, *ante*409, reaffirmed.

This cause was heard before Kellogg, Judge, and a jury, at May term, 1851, of the Peoria Circuit Court, verdict and judgment for the defendants in the Court below.

Plaintiff below, brings the cause to this Court.

C. Ballance, *pro se.*

E. 1ST. Powell, for Defts in Error.

Trumbull, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants in ejectment, to recover one acre of land off of the east side of the south west and south-east fractional quarters of section nine, in township eight, north of range eight east, situated in the county of Peoria, and State of Illinois.

Plea, not guilty. Jury trial and verdict for the defendants.

The plaintiff, to support the issue on his part, proved the defendants in possession of part of the premises sued for at the *417commencement of the action, and offered in evidence, the same tax title which has already been passed upon in the case of Spellman *v.*Curtenius, *ante,*409.

The Court excluded the tax deed from the consideration of the jury, and in so doing committed an error, as has been already decided in the case alluded to. No objections were made to the tax title in this case, which were not urged in that, and reference is made to the opinion in that case, for the reasons of our decision in this.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
EX-31 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification.

  Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.
  250 Vesey Street
  4 World Financial Center, 10th Floor
  New York, New York 10080



  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  9062 Old Anapolis Road
  Columbia, MD 21045


Re: Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-A1

  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series
     2006-A1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for ABS and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
     required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122
     of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
     included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed
     in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in
     such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer and Washington Mutual
     Bank, as Servicer.

     Date:    June 11, 2008

     /s/ Diane Courtney
     Signature

     Vice President
     Title
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6527 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to establish a veterans 

business enterprises program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2022 

Mrs. STEEL (for herself and Ms. PORTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and 

in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to 

establish a veterans business enterprises program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Driving Veterans Suc5 cess Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6527 IH

1 SEC. 2. VETERANS BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PROGRAM. 

2 Section 11101 of the Infrastructure Investment and 

3 Jobs Act (Public Law 117–58) is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) VETERANS BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PRO6 GRAM.—Except to the extent that the Secretary deter7 mines otherwise, not less than 10 percent of the amounts 

8 made available for any program under this division (other 

9 than section 14004), division C, and section 403 of title 

10 23, United States Code, shall be expended through small 

11 business concerns owned and controlled by veterans, as de12 fined in section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

13 632(q)).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Donald Raymond SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General; Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-55708.

D.C. No. CV 00-08282 GAF.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 14, 2002.

Before BRIGHT*, GOODWIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

*

**The Honorable Myron H. Bright, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER**

The judgment of the district court dismissing the action with prejudice is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed January 31, 2001, the findings and conclusions of which were adopted by the district court in its order entered February 23, 2001.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.