alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029391
<NAME> PAYCO AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                       996
<INVENTORY>                                     48,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,168
<PP&E>                                          89,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,829)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        


</TABLE>
AFL 3.31.14 Ex 10.49




Aflac Incorporated 1st Quarter 2014 10-Q
EXHIBIT 10.49


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN ERIC KIRSCH AND
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF COLUMBUS




THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 1st day of January 2014, by and between American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, a Nebraska corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Corporation") and Eric Kirsch (hereinafter referred to as "Employee").


W I T N E S S E T H THAT


WHEREAS, Corporation and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2011 which was amended by an amendment dated December 10, 2012 (such agreement as so amended being referred to as the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, Corporation and Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement, by increasing Employee’s base salary effective as of January 1, 2014;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth and contained herein, Corporation and Employee agree that the Employment Agreement shall be modified as follows:


1.Exhibit A of this Agreement shall be fully amended, restated, superseded and replaced in its entirety with the form of Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.  


2.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and exchanged by facsimile or electronically scanned copy. Each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


3.Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and continue to bind the parties.  


4.The Amendment as it relates to Base Salary shall be effective as of January 1, 2014. 






[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]





















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Corporation has hereunto caused its duly authorized executive to execute this Amendment on behalf of Corporation, and Employee has hereunto set his hand, all being done in duplicate originals, with one original being delivered to each party, as of the 1st day of January, 2014.


	
				
	Employee
	 
	 
	American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac)

	/s/ Eric Kirsch
	 
	By:  
	/s/ Daniel P. Amos

	Eric Kirsch
	 
	 
	Daniel P. Amos
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Attest:
	/s/ J. Matthew Loudermilk

	 
	 
	 
	J. Matthew Loudermilk
VP, Corporate Secretary











2








EXHIBIT A TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION










Base salary at an annual rate of $585,000.00



3
#### Patrick Alexander Fogarty, Respondent, *v.*William P. Fogarty, Appellant.

(No. 2.)

First Department,

October 23, 1908.

Discovery —■ partnership — accounting.

A plaintiff, suing for a dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting, is not entitled to a discovery of the defendant’s books and papers prior to a determination that he is entitled to an accounting.

Appeal by the defendant, William P. Fogarty, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of April, 1908, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 2d day of June, 1908, granting the plaintiff’s motion for an inspection of books and papers.

*Eugene*Frayer, for the appellant.

*Edward W. S. Johnston,*for the respondent.

Ingraham, J.:

This action was brought to dissolve a partnership which it is claimed was composed of the plaintiff and the defendant and for an accounting.

The answer admits that a partnership was formed of which the defendant was a special partner, and alleges that on the 1st of May, 1905, the partnership was dissolved by an agreement in which it was provided that the two general partners should pay and discharge all the outstanding obligations of the copartnership and hold the defendant free and harmless from any and all claims connected ivith the said copartnership, and should repay to the defendant the sum of $5,000, the capital contributed by him to the said copartnership ; that subsequently the partnership between the plaintiff and Tuttle, the other general partner, was dissolved, by which agreement of dissolution the plaintiff agreed to pay and discharge all of the outstanding obligations of the copartnership, including its liability to repay to this defendant the amount contributed by him to ■ the copartnership; that no part of said special capital has been repaid, and further alleged that the plaintiff gave to the defendant a promissory note for $5,000, which, has not been paid. The defendant, therefore, demands a dismissal of the complaint and *276an accounting of the special copartnership and judgment for the $5,000. ...

The plaintiff replied to this counterclaim and then made a motion for a discovery, which motion was granted.

The same question that is presented upon this application is presented in the case between these same parties in *Fogarty*v. *Fogarty, No. 1*(128 App. Div. 272), decided herewith.. A discovery of these books and papers will only become material upon the accounting, and before such'discovery can, be granted the plaintiff must establish that he is entitled to such an accounting. .

It follows that the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and the motion for a discovery denied, with ten dollars costs.'

Patteesox, P. J, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ, concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dolíais costs and .disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
PARADIGM MEDICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                  114,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           596,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             30,000
<INVENTORY>                                             720,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,415,000
<PP&E>                                                  640,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                           93,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,241,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   492,000
<BONDS>                                                  33,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,711,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,241,000
<SALES>                                               1,258,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,258,000
<CGS>                                                   813,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,973,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         11,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       33,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2,759,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,759,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,759,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.69)
        

</TABLE>
#### In re William T. ROBINSON, Petitioner.

No. 02-7328.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 20, 2002.

William T. Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

William T. Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging undue delay in the adjudication of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act, and vacation of his conviction and sentence. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently dismissed Robinson’s § 2254 petition. Moreover, to the extent Robinson takes issue with the denial of relief in his § 2254 petition, the district court’s order may be challenged on appeal, so mandamus relief is not available. *See In re United Steelworkers,*595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). Accordingly, although we grant Robinson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6220 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 100 3rd Avenue Northwest in Perham, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Charles P. Nord Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6220 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHARLES P. NORD POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 100 3rd Avenue Northwest in 

4 Perham, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Charles P. Nord Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles P. Nord Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6220 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. in Perham, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Charles P. Nord al Service located at 100 3rd Avenue Northwest
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Pet Express Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Renea Yamada, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Diane Egger, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Renea Yamada

Renea Yamada

Chief Executive Officer

March 26, 2007



/s/ Diane Egger

Diane Egger

Chief Financial Officer

March 26, 2007
Document

Exhibit 10(m)

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is effective as of February 19, 2020 (“Amendment Effective Date”) between ___________ (“Executive”), Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”), and Glacier Bank (“Bank”) (the Company and Bank, together, “Employer”), and modifies the Employment Agreement between Executive and Employer, effective as of March 5, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”).
AGREEMENT
1.Amendment.  Executive and Employer agree that Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“The term of this Agreement (as amended hereby) will begin on February 19, 2020 (the “Amended Commencement Date”) and continue for a period of two (2) years (the “Term”), with such Term being subject to prior termination in accordance with this Agreement; provided, however, that on each anniversary of the Amended Commencement Date (each such date, a “Renewal Date”), this Agreement and the Term shall be deemed to be automatically extended, upon the same terms and conditions, for an additional one–year period (so that the Term perpetually renews annually for a new two–year Term), unless either the Company and the Bank or the Executive give(s) written notice of non-renewal to the other party(ies) at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to a Renewal Date (in which case this Agreement and the Term will terminate at the end of the then–current two–year Term).”
1.Other Terms.  Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms of the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
2.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument.  The parties agree that facsimile or electronic signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures.


- Signatures Follow on the Next Page -















Exhibit 10(m)

The parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.  


												
	EXECUTIVE:		EMPLOYER:	
			Glacier Bancorp, Inc.	
				
			By:	
			Its:	
			Attested to:	
				
			By:	
			Its:	
			Glacier Bank	
				
			By:	
			Its:	
			Attested to:	
				
			By:	
			Its:	




























[Signature Page to Amendment to Employment Agreement]
----

----

| Dated: | March 21, 2012 |   | /s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley |
|--------|----------------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |           |   | Michael Wellesley-Wesley     |
|   |           |   | President and                |
|   |           |   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |           |   |                         |
|   |           |   |                         |
| Dated: | March 21, 2012 |   | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak          |
|   |           |   | Jerry Kieliszak              |
|   |           |   | Senior Vice President and    |
|   |           |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|   |           |   |                         |

----

----
#### Richard NASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLUMEX U.S.A., INC., DefendantAppellee.

Docket No. 00-7576.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 19, 2002.

Richard Nash, pro se, St. Albans, NY, for Appellant.

Joseph D. Sullivan, Sullivan *&*Sullivan, Garden City, NY, for Appellee.

Present FEINBERG, CARDAMONE and SACK, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Richard Nash appeals from the district court’s judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of the defendant. In June 1998, Nash, an African-American, filed a complaint against Blumex, U.S.A., Inc. (“Blumex”), his former employer, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e *et seq.,*claiming that Blumex fired him in February 1998 due to his race and in retaliation for actions he had taken in response to racially discriminatory behavior.

We have no authority to decide whether the jury was right or wrong.

> We will upset a jury verdict only if there is such a complete absence of evidence supporting the verdict that the jury’s findings could only have been the result of sheer surmise and conjecture. We must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the verdict was rendered, giving that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences that the jury might have drawn in his favor. And we may not assess the weight of conflicting evidence, pass on the credibility of the witnesses, or substitute our judgment for that of the jury. A party seeking to overturn a verdict based on the sufficiency of the evidence bears a very heavy burden.

*Norton v. Sam’s Club,*145 F.3d 114, 118 (2d Cir.) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted), *cert. denied,*525 U.S. 1001, 119 S.Ct. 511, 142 L.Ed.2d 424 (1998).

We cannot say that there was “a complete absence of evidence supporting the verdict.” There was evidence from which the jury could find that Nash was terminated because of his poor attitude and work performance, rather than his race and his plan to consult a lawyer about his race-discrimination claim. There was also evidence to support a jury finding that Nash often complained about the amount *501of work he was required to do, refused to perform assigned tasks, talked about quitting, received oral criticism and a written warning about his job performance, and threatened to burn down the house of Blumex’s General Manager. That evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Douglas V. Reynolds, President and Chief
Executive Officer and Charles P. Crimmel, Chief Financial Officer of Energy Services of America Corporation (the “Company”)
each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 and that to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  February 13, 2017 | /s/ Douglas V. Reynolds | 
|------------------------ | ----------------------- | 
|                         | Douglas V. Reynolds     | 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer | 
|                         |                         | 
|Date:  February 13, 2017 | /s/Charles P. Crimmel   | 
|                         | Charles P. Crimmel      | 
|                         | Chief Financial Officer | 



The purpose of this statement is solely
to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Services of America Corporation and will be retained by Energy Services of
America Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.2


[LOGO] FREMONT
-----------------
INVESTMENT & LOAN

                     SERVICER ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 Re: The Trusts listed on Exhibit 1

I, John Alkire, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing for the calendar year
ended December 31, 2006, certify to the Depositor, Trustee and Master Servicer
listed parties to the respective Pooling and Servicing Agreements set forth on
Exhibit 1, and their respective officers, directors and affiliates, and with the
knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that for the
calendar year ended December 31, 2006.

      (i)   A review of activities of Fremont Investment & Loan (the "Servicer")
            during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and of the
            Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreements
            listed on the attached Exhibit 1 (the "Agreements") has been made
            under my supervision and

      (ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
            fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements, in all
            material respects throughout such year or portion thereof.

Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings
assigned thereto in the related Pooling and Servicing Agreements set forth on
the attached Exhibit 1.

Date: March 20, 2007

/s/ John Alkire
---------------
John Alkire
Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing




                 LEGAL | 2727 E. IMPERIAL HWY | BREA, CA 92821
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Member FDIC | Serving our customers since 1937
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 1

Goldman Sachs

      o     GSAMP Trust 2006-FM1 pursuant to theis Assignment, Assumption and
            Recognition Agreement dated April 27, 2006, amoung Goldman Sachs
            Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and Fremont
            Investment & Loan























(REVISED-4/20/07)