alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
V. Fisher, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


 /s/ Joseph V. Fisher
---------------------------
Joseph V. Fisher
President & Chief Executive Officer

December 17, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029319
<NAME> ASSET RECOVERY & MANAGEMENT CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,186
<INVENTORY>                                     68,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,105
<PP&E>                                          87,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

128400 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ELIZABETH RATHBURN, Individually and as Stephen J. Markman, Next Friend of JUST IN WADE CHILDREY, a Justices Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128400 COA: 250126 Wayne CC: 02-235017-NO CHILDREN’S HOSPITA L OF MICHIGAN, PATRICIA SIEGEL, Ph.D., SANFORD COHEN, M.D., STEVE COHEN, Ph.D., JOSEPH KAPLAN, M.D ., DR. ABDEL-HAQ, M.D., ELIZABETH SECORD, M.D., and DR. PILTCH, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY

, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p1128 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2005

Clerk
Exhibit 10(a)

 

AMENDMENT TO THE

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION

EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN

 

Protective Life Corporation (the “Company”) hereby amends the Protective Life Corporation Excess Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) as follows:

 

1.                                      Section 13 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows, effective as of December 1, 2013:

 

13.  Tax Withholding.  All payments under the Plan shall be subject to applicable federal, state and local tax withholding.  If taxes are imposed under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act or any other tax law (“Advance Taxes”) with respect to the Excess Benefits payable to a Participant or Beneficiary, the Company shall remit such Advance Taxes in such amounts and at such time or times as required or permitted by law.  To the extent required or permitted by applicable law (including Treasury Regulation 31.3121(v) or any successor thereto), the Company shall recover the Participant’s or Beneficiary’s portion of such Advance Taxes by (1) collecting payment therefore from the Participant or Beneficiary, (2) reducing the benefits actually paid from the Plan to the Participant or Beneficiary at the time such benefits are paid,  (3) distributing to the Participant or Beneficiary an amount equal to such portion of the Advance Taxes (plus any amounts as may be required to satisfy the tax withholding obligations and other required deductions with respect to such distribution), which distribution may be made prior to the date payment of the Excess Benefits otherwise begins under the Plan, and/or (4) reducing the value of the Excess Benefits otherwise payable hereunder to take into account, on an actuarial basis, the present value of all taxes remitted by the Company with respect to the Participant’s or Beneficiary’s portion of such Advance Taxes.

 

2.   Except as specifically set forth herein, the terms of Plan shall remain the same.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment on this 17th day of April, 2014, effective as set forth herein.

 

	
 
    	
PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ D. Scott Adams
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
D. Scott Adams
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Senior Vice President and Chief
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Human Resources Officer
WMB_2014.03.31_EX10.2














January 27, 2014






Dear Jim,


Thank you for verbally accepting our offer to you to serve as senior vice president, Northeast Gathering and Processing.  As we have previously communicated, the position will require relocation to Pennsylvania and you will receive the Guaranteed Purchase Option (Plan A) relocation plan in order to assist you in your move, subject to certain repayment obligations if you voluntarily terminate employment within two years of January 23, 2014, the effective date of your new position in Pennsylvania.  Williams also agrees that, in the event of your death, retirement,  or should your employment involuntarily terminate, other than for gross misconduct, you (or your family in the event of your death) will receive relocation benefits of equal or lesser value to your move from Oklahoma to Pennsylvania (“Relocation from Pennsylvania Benefits”).  


Please acknowledge your acceptance of Williams’ commitment to provide Relocation from Pennsylvania Benefits by signing below.   If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by phone or by email.  


Sincerely,


Stephanie Cipolla
Vice President 
Human Resources




SIGNATURE: /s/ James E. Scheel_________________ DATE: __3/19/14__________________
                       Jim Scheel
Exhibit
      3.1






THE
      PEOPLES GAS
      LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY






Amendments
      to
      By-Laws Effective May 17, 2007






The
        Sections of the
        By-Laws identified below are replaced in their entirety to read as
        follows:






"SECTION 4.1.  
Election
      of
      Officers.  There shall be elected by the Board of Directors in
      each year the following officers:  a Chairman of the Board; a Vice
      Chairman; a President; a Chief Financial Officer; such number of Senior Vice
      Presidents, such number of Vice Presidents and such number of Assistant Vice
      Presidents as the Board at the time may decide upon; a Secretary; such number
      of
      Assistant Secretaries as the Board at the time may decide upon; a Treasurer;
      and
      such number of Assistant Treasurers as the Board at the time may decide
      upon.  There may also be elected a General Counsel.  There
      may also be elected such number of Assistant General Counsel and such number
      of
      Executive Vice Presidents as the Board at the time may decide
      upon.  Any two or more offices may be held by one person, except that
      the offices of President and Secretary may not be held by the same
      person.  All officers shall hold their respective offices during the
      pleasure of the Board.





SECTION 4.2.  
Appointment
      of Officers.  The Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board,
      the Vice Chairman, or the President may from time to time appoint such other
      officers as may be deemed necessary, including one or more Vice Presidents,
      one
      or more Assistant Vice Presidents, one or more Assistant Secretaries, one or
      more Assistant Treasurers, a Controller, and one or more Assistant Controllers,
      one or more Assistant General Counsel and such other agents and employees of
      the
      Company as may be deemed proper.  Such officers, agents and employees
      shall have such authority, perform such duties and receive such compensation
      as
      the Board of Directors, or, in the case of appointments made by the Chairman
      of
      the Board, the Vice Chairman, or the President, as the Chairman of the Board,
      the Vice Chairman,  or the President, may from time to time prescribe
      and determine.  The Board of Directors may from time to time authorize
      any officer to appoint and remove agents and employees, to prescribe their
      powers and duties and to fix their compensation therefor."
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The undersigned officer of China Ruitai International Holdings Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 15, 2011

By:
/s/ Dian Min MaDian Min Ma, Chief Executive Officer
#### Derek Maurice BETHEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIVIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1983.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

Derek Maurice Bethel, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy North Delogu, Katherine Anne Goetzl, Stacey L. Hawkins, Littler Mendel-son, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Derek Maurice Bethel appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Bethel v. Civic Dev.*
      *146
      *Group,*No. CA-01-54-4 (W.D.Va. July 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Vincente A. MENCHACA, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7112.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Nov. 6, 2002.

Before CLEVENGER, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cjr. R. 36.
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:584c6893-70da-48b8-a8a4-a70ce80535bb,g:f1b20918-030f-4aa2-88ec-9c4b187960a7-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:cinf="http://www.cinfin.com/20221031" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.cinfin.com/20221031">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cinf-20221031_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cinf-20221031_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPageCoverPage" roleURI="http://www.cinfin.com/role/CoverPageCoverPage">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Cover Page Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00186-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.G. A CHILD,

Appellant

From the County Court at Law

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 85553CCL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 20, 2014 Carla Arisano and Brock Brinkman filed a notice of appeal from 

the trial court’s issuance of a protective order on March 21, 2014. The notice of appeal 

appears to be untimely filed. The notice of appeal from the trial court indicates that no 

motion for new trial was filed. Appellants indicate that “329b motions” were filed. A 

motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is necessarily implied if the 

notice of appeal is filed within 15 days of the date notice is due; but Appellant must still 

supply a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal. See Verburgt 

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellants have not filed any explanation for 

the late filing of the notice of appeal. 
In the Interest of C.G. a Child Page 2

By letter dated July 11, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants that the 

appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that the notice of appeal was 

untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The Clerk also warned Appellants that the appeal 

would be dismissed unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed 

showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. Appellants have 

not filed a response. 

Additionally, this Court sent a notice that the appeal was subject to dismissal 

because a docketing statement had not been filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1; TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(b), (c). No docketing statement has been filed.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 4, 2014

[CV06]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE ESTATE OF

RODOLFO MORALES, DECEASED. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00334

- CV

Appeal from

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2009

- P00817)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and it s sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013.

SUSAN LARSEN, Senior Judge

Before McClure, C.J., Larsen, J. (Senior), and Barajas, C.J. (Senior)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

, sitting by assignment

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
#### Mrs. Evelyn H. BROWNE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John William COATS et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 8198.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 29, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 10, 1954.

Russell E. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for appellants.

Bethard & Bethard, Coushatta, for ap-pellees.

HARDY, Judge.

This is a companion suit to that of Jowers against the same defendants, 76 So.2d 99, and was consolidated with said case for purposes of trial. The facts and the law involved are identical with the Jow-ers case and for the reasons therein assigned ;

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from in the instant case be and it is hereby affirmed at appellant’s cost.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



________________





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  November 6, 2008





CHYRON CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

|New York                                       | 1-9014                   | 11-2117385                          
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

|5 Hub Drive                              |           
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|Melville, New York                       | 11747     
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000







Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---

Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition

On November 6, 2008, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008. A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

(c) Exhibits.

99.1 Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated November 6, 2008.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

CHYRON CORPORATION

| | By:    | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | Jerry Kieliszak          
| | Title: | Senior Vice President and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer  



|Exhibit No. | Description                           
|----------- | --------------------------------------
|            |                                       
|99.1        | Press Release, dated November 6, 2008.

Date:  November 7, 2008
----

----

| Name of Subsidiary               |   | Jurisdiction of |
|----------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| 100% owned by the Company        |   | Incorporation   |
|                             |   |            |
| Chyron International Corporation |   | New York, USA   |

----

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Royal Equine Alliance Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  March 25, 2009   | By:  /s/ Demitro Marianovich
|----------------------- | ----------------------------
|                       
|Demitro Marianovich    
|Chief Financial Officer