alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029320
   <NAME>  Indiana Mutual Credit Association Inc.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                133,185
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          64,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                            36,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      241,686
<PP&E>                              4,580,047
<DEPRECIATION>                      4,519,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        363,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 915,138
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                              159,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                          (711,506)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          363,352
<SALES>                               137,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      143,654
<CGS>                                 148,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         148,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       88,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      8,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (100,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (100,661)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        (100,661)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Consolidated Water Company of Suburban New York, Appellant, *v.*William I. Odell and Others, Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Ardsley, County of Westchester, State of New York, Acting as Assessors of Said Village, Respondents.

Second Department,

December 30, 1908.

Tax — certiorari —review of village assessment.

Certiorari to review a village assessment on personal property is a proceeding under section 253 of chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896.

Where village assessors do not deny the verified statement of a water company, showing that its indebtedness, not contracted in the purchase of non-taxable property for the purpose of avoiding taxation, is largely in excess of its personal property, the assessment will be canceled.

Appeal by the relator, the Consolidated Water Company of Suburban New York, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 10th day of July, 1908, as denies the relator’s application to cancel an assessment.

*Charles P. Blaney,*for the appellant.

*Joseph L. Glover,*for the respondents.

Woodward, J.:

The application for the writ in this proceeding was made for the purpose of reviewing the assessment of personal property of the *476relator in the village of Ardsley for the year 1908, as provided by section 109 of the Village Law (Laws of 1897, chap. 414), which permits a review of assessments in the manner provided by the Tax Law. The proceeding is, therefore, under the provisions of section 253 of chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896. The relator in its petition sets forth that it made a verified statement to the respondents, acting as a board of assessors, showing the condition of its assets and liabilities for the pui’poses of assessment on the 1st day of May, 1908, and that such statement showed that it did not own any personal property subject to taxation, owing to the fact that its indebtedness, not contracted in the purchase of non-taxable property for the purpose of avoiding taxation, was largely in excess of the value of its personal property. The return to the writ does not deny that such statement was made ; does not suggest a single reason why the statement was not entitled to be accepted as true, and, indeed, raises mo issue whatever. The statement, if true, discloses a state of facts which clearly entitles the relator to the relief asked for, and all of the questions suggested by the respondents on this appeal appear to have been fully considered and disposed of in the case of *People ex rel. Bhumgara Co.*v. *Wells*(93 App. Div. 212, 215; affd., without opinion, 179 N. Y. 529), and there is no occasion for continuing the discussion. (See, also, *People ex rel. Bishop*v. Feitner, 116 App. Div. 452, 456.)

The portion of the order appealed from should be reversed, and the assessment canceled.

Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order in so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the assessment canceled.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 4, 2013

s0225

Order 

March 4, 2013

146137

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146137

COA: 305480

Wayne CC: 10-000372-FH

DANIEL BRATHER COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

VIVIANO, J., not participating.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50810-50811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1397-000]


Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 21, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is September 11, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 50811]]

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#581e1d0a1b17363431363d0b2d2828372a2c183e3d2a3b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5e3e0f7e6eacbc9cccbc0f6d0d5d5cad7d1e5c3c0d7c68bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19929 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6473 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6473

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish the number of 
   known or suspected terrorists encountered attempting to enter the 
       United States on a monthly basis, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2022

  Mr. Pfluger (for himself, Mr. Katko, and Mr. Higgins of Louisiana) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish the number of 
   known or suspected terrorists encountered attempting to enter the 
       United States on a monthly basis, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLICATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY OF THE 
              NUMBER OF KNOWN OR SUSPECTED TERRORISTS ENCOUNTERED 
              ATTEMPTING TO ENTER THE UNITED STATES.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, not later than the 
fifteenth day of each month, publish the total number of known or 
suspected terrorists, and individuals whose identities are included in 
the Terrorist Screening Database, encountered by the Department of 
Homeland Security attempting to enter the United States during the 
immediately preceding month. Each such report shall--
            (1) include the aggregate such number, and such number 
        disaggregated by geographic regions of such encounters, 
        including distinctions relating to whether such encounters were 
        land-, air-, or sea-based; and
            (2) be published on a public-facing website of the 
        Department.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Shore Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 13, 2003

  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi
Exhibit 10.4


 


Amendment to Employment Agreement







            Amendment to the Employment Agreement (this "Amendment"), made as of March 4, 2014 by and between Vishay Americas, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vishay Americas"), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Vishay"), and DAVID VALLETTA ("Executive") (collectively the "Parties").







            WHEREAS, Executive is employed by Vishay Americas and is a Party to that certain Employment Agreement made between the Parties as of September 1, 2011 (the "Agreement");







            WHEREAS, Vishay Americas and Executive may amend the Agreement by mutual agreement in writing pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Agreement; and







             WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.







            NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:







1.            Section 4.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing "2012" and "60%" in the third sentence with "2014" and "100%", respectively.







2.            The amendments to the Agreement made by paragraph 1 of this Amendment shall be effective as of March 4, 2014.







3.            Except as set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







4.            This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf as of the date first above written.












VISHAY AMERICAS, INC.







By: /s/ Carl Fritz


Name: Carl Fritz


Title: Executive VP Admin







Date: April 22, 2014







[Executive's signature on next page]













/s/ David Valletta


David Valletta







Date: April 23, 2014
1

Filed 7/6/23 P. v. Balbuena CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CARLINE BALBUENA,

Defendant and Appellant.

C097678

(Super. Ct. No. 05F11542)

Defendant Carline Balbuena appeals the trial court’s denial of her petition for 

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Appointed counsel filed a brief raising 

no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 or People v. Wende 

1

 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. Effective June 30, 2022, the 

Legislature renumbered former section 1170.95 to section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, 

§ 10.) There were no substantive changes to the statute. Defendant filed her petition 

under former section 1170.95, but we will cite to the current section 1172.6 throughout 

this opinion.
2

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and requesting we exercise our discretion to review the entire 

record for arguable issues on appeal.

DISCUSSION

On April 14, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel had filed a brief indicating 

no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an order 

denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent 

review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in People v. 

Delgadillo, defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising 

any argument she wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if we 

did not receive a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss the 

appeal as abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no 

communication from defendant.

We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. 

(People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
3

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

 /s/

HORST, J.

We concur:

 /s/

ROBIE, Acting P. J.

 /s/

HULL, J.



 Judge of the Placer County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to 

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
#### David ROSSER-EL, Sultan; Edna Gorham-Bey; United States Moorish-American Nation, Incorporated, District of Columbia, a non-profit corporation; Anita E. Belle, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; United Kingdom; Nation of Germany; Nation of Portugal; Nation of Spain; Nation of Italy; Nation of France; Holy See; Nation of Denmark; Juan Carlos, I, King of Spain, as beneficiary of the Estate of Isabel I and Ferdinand I; Elizabeth, II of the United Kingdom; Crown of London; Nation of The Netherlands; Nation of Belgium; Mother Supreme (Masonic) Council of the World; United States Department of Justice; Sovereign Military Order of Malta; Federal Reserve Bank of New York; International Monetary Fund; World Bank; George H.W. Bush; George W. Bush; Russell Trust, a/k/a Yale University Order of Skull and Bones, Brotherhood of Death, of (Illuminati) Chapter 322; Robert Gallo; Litton Industries, Inc., d/b/a Northrop Grumman Corporation; The World Health Organization; Unknown Defendants, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 02-1627.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 2, 2002.

Decided Nov. 6, 2002.

David Rosser-El, Edna Gorham-Bey, Anita E. Belle, Appellants Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Rosser-El v. United States,*No. CA-02-293-AW (D. Md. filed Apr. 2, 2002, entered Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*