U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Statistical Evaluation of Torn and Cut Duct Tape Physical End Matching
NCJ Number
              235287

Author(s)
          Frederic A. Tulleners, M.A.;
                        Jerome V. Braun, Ph.D.
Date Published

July 2011
Length
              90 pages
Annotation
              This study examined issues related to duct-tape physical end matching, with attention to criteria for describing the matching process, a protocol for training analysts in physical end matching, and statistically evaluating the associated error rates and overall accuracy.
Abstract
              The study confirmed that it is possible to use physical end matching to identify duct tape samples as matching or non-matching. Differences between analysts, brands, tape grades, tape color, and method of separation make varying contributions to misidentifications or inconclusive results. Brand and type grade are apparently more important than color in their effect on an analyst in correctly identifying duct-tape end matches. Scissor-cut tapes are apparently more difficult to analyze than hand-torn tapes, but there is no significant different in difficulty of analysis between hand-torn tape and tape cut with a box cutter knife. Consistent tearing conditions do not seem to influence an analyst's ability to identify duct-tape end matches. This study also showed the importance of peer review in duct-tape analysis and its ability to greatly reduce the number of misidentifications by analysts. The research examined 1,800 torn-tape specimens and 400 cut-tape specimens. The mean accuracy observed ranged from 98.58 to 100.00 percent for torn tape and from 98.15 to 99.83 percent for cut tape. The mean false-positive rate ranged from 0.00 to 0.67 percent for torn tape and from 0.00 to 3.33 for cut tape. The mean false-negative rate ranged from 0.00 to 2.67 percent for torn tape and was 0.33 percent for both types of cut tape. 64 exhibits, 10 references, a listing of venues in which the research findings have been disseminated, and appended supplementary information
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2009-DN-BX-K235


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Study/Research)


  
  
        
  Award
        Statistical Evaluation of Torn Duct Tape
    
  
  
Date Published: July 1, 2011
    
          Downloads
        
                      PDF

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Criminology
        Evidence
        Evidence collection
        Evidence Identification
        Forensic sciences



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Near-infrared Excitation Raman Analysis of Underlying Colorants on Redyed Fabric
                  Commentary On: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in Probabilistic Genotyping of Low Template DNA: A Case Study Comparing STRmixTM and TrueAlleleTM
                  Is It an Accident or Abuse? Researchers Develop Predictive Models for Pediatric Head Injuries
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov