alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2020 

No. 04-19-00803-CR 

Pedro JIMENEZ, 

Appellant 

v. 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2018CR13315 

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding 

ORDE R

Appellant Pedro Jimenez entered into a plea bargain with the State pursuant to which he 

pleaded guilty to felon in possession of a firearm as a repeat offender. The trial court imposed

sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant 

timely filed a notice of appeal, and the district clerk filed a copy of the clerk’s record, which 

includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement. See

id. R. 25.2(d). We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the 

right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 

Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not 

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id.

R. 25.2(a)(2). The record also supports the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have

a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court

of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is

accurate).

Accordingly, appellant is given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that 

appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by or before February 6, 

2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, 

pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). 
We ORDER all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We 

further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and 

the court reporter. 

_________________________________ 

Beth Watkins, Justice 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of January, 2020. 

___________________________________ 

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

Clerk of Court
#### Samson JEGEDE, Appellant, v. Constance REESE, Warden; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Appellees.

No. 03-1129.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2003.

Decided Aug. 15, 2003.

*612Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sam Jegede, a federal inmate who pleaded guilty to drug-trafficking and money-laundering offenses, *see United States v. Jegede,*98-1662, 1998 WL 553249 (8th Cir. Aug.31, 1998) (unpublished per curiam), appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We affirm.

In his section 2241 petition, Jegede, born in Nigeria, claimed that his counsel had been ineffective in failing to inform him of the prospect of his deportation as a consequence of his convictions, thereby rendering his guilty plea involuntary. Jegede alleged that he was notified after his first section 2255 motion had been denied that he was subject to deportation upon completion of his sentence.

We agree with the district court that Jegede’s inability to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion does not make section 2255 inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention, *see United States v. Lurie,*207 F.3d 1075, 1077 (8th Cir.2000) (to establish that § 2255 relief is “inadequate or ineffective,” more is required than demonstrating that procedural barrier prevents bringing § 2255 motion); *Triestman v. United States,*124 F.3d 361, 376 (2d Cir.1997) (§ 2241 relief is not available merely because prisoner faces substantive or procedural barrier to § 2255 relief). Further, we disagree with Jegede that his petition is not successive under *Crouch v. Norris,*251 F.3d 720 (8th Cir. 2001).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable E. Skipworth Swearingen, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1999 and the consolidated statement
of income for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,383 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0 
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,449 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0 
<BONDS>                                         44,223 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                        31,952 
<OTHER-SE>                                     397,097 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   523,449 
<SALES>                                              0        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,854 
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,108 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,287 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,244 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,043 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64 
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Peter J. Burlage, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”),certify, that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Peter J. Burlage     Peter J. Burlage    President and Chief Executive Officer    Date: May 9, 2008  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.*
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 99-60205 Summary Calendar

__________________ RAUL O. PAZ-MUNOZ, Petitioner,
versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A74-647-180

-------------------- January 26, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Raul O. Paz-Munoz petitions this court to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal seeking reversal of an order of deportation denying his applications for political asylum and withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the BIA’s denials of Paz-Munoz’s applications for asylum andNo. 99-60205 -2- withholding of deportation are supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v. INS , 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994). The petition for review is DENIED.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                 --------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                        Date of Report: March 23, 2001
                        (Date of earliest event reported)


                       CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                             (Packager and Servicer)
    (Issuer in Respect of the REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-3)
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 Delaware                     333-72459                     13-3408713
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other juris-       (Commission                 (I.R.S. Employer
diction of organization)      File Nos.)                 Identification No.)


12855 North Outer Forty Drive, St. Louis, Missouri            63141
--------------------------------------------------            -----
   (Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)


Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code (314) 851-6305
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)


<PAGE>

Item 5.        Other Events.

      Attached as Exhibit 8.3 is the opinion of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
with respect to certain tax matters relating to the Issuer's REMIC Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2001-3, including their consent.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                            CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                                            (Registrant)

                                           By: /s/ Michael J. Tarpley
                                               -------------------------
                                                   Michael J. Tarpley
                                                   Assistant Secretary


Dated: March 23, 2001
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      7, 2010 | /s/Kenneth      R. Burk                                  |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Kenneth      R. Burk                                     |
|                              | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of IBroadband, Inc., on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Matthew Hutchins, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in al material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IBroadband, Inc.





By/s/ Matthew Hutchins









Chief Financial and Executive Officer



Date:  June 26, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a correction in Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), Services Subcommittee Conference Call and Webinar, September 15, 2008, 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 15, 2008, 73 FR 47958.                

The correct meeting access code is 3857872. Everything else remains the same.

Dated: August 20, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-19804 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
| **Description of Business (Details)** | 6 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Basis of Presentation [Abstract]**  |           |
| Number of reportable segments         | 3              |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Basis of Presentation [Abstract]
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**chdn_BasisofPresentationAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**chdn_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of segments reported by the entity. A reportable segment is a component of an entity for which there is an accounting requirement to report separate financial information on that component in the entity's financial statements.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 280 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 18 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=123359005&loc=d3e8672-108599
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NumberOfReportableSegments**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,482
<INVENTORY>                                      7,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,561
<PP&E>                                       4,797,344
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,065,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,631,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,104
<BONDS>                                      1,920,133
<COMMON>                                        43,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,133,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,631,960
<SALES>                                        427,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               705,538
<CGS>                                          163,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               183,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                  33,579
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (205,549)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (118,801)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.56)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.53)
        
<FN>
<F1>  Reflects basic earnings per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Viy-.-6Am--f 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0219

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MIKI L. ADAMS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

DIRK S. ADAMS,

 Respondent and Appellant.

SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR 

APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

On May 2, 2023, Christopher Gillette was appointed as mediator, he has since 

informed this office that he must decline the appointment.

ACCORDINGLY, the appointment of Mr. Gillette is rescinded, and: IT IS 

ORDERED THAT Robert L. Jovick, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys 

desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained 

pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process 

required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this May 2, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

05/02/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0219
c: Dirk S. Adams, Jami L. Rebsom, Adrienne R. Ellington, Robert L. Jovick
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the amended quarterly report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, (the
Report), I, Louis B. Breaux, the Principal Operating Officer of
the Company, certify, based on my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act  of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: /s/ Louis B. Breaux
Louis B. Breaux
Principal Operating Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: January
8, 2004

---