alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Peter J. Ryan, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County,

December 3, 1956.

*E. John Ernst, Jr.,*for John J. Fitter, petitioner.

*Edwin L. Smart*and *Frank McCabe*for Carroll E. Blessing and others.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General,*for Hudson River State Hospital.

*Denis G. Mclnerney,*special guardian for incompetents.

*Fred Feinglass*and *Phil J. Zichello*for Mabel A. Relihan and others.

*108Christopher C. McGrath, S.

It appears that the estate of deceased executrix is entitled to receive a substantial sum as undistributed income in the above estate.

The petitioner as a representative of a deceased income beneficiary is an executor of a “ residuary beneficiary ” within the intendment of subdivision 2 of section 133 of the Surrogate’s Court Act *(Matter of Folsom,*3 Misc 2d 75).

Accordingly, letters of administration with the will annexed will issue to the petitioner upon filing a bond in the sum of $58,000 and otherwise qualifying pursuant to statute.

Settle decree.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Russell A. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Intcomex, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2008



/s/ Russell A. OlsonRussell A. OlsonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
EX-33 (f)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB
SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the "CFR"), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c),
(d)(4)(ii), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with
respect to the transactions covered by this report (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(4)(vii) and
(d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the
Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of
these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions
covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed
after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after
January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as
of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that
the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the
Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole except for as
discussed below:

Standard                Description
1122(d)(1)(i)   The Asserting Party has not instituted policies and procedures
                to specifically monitor performance or other triggers or
                events of default stated in the transaction agreements
1122(d)(1)(iv)  During the months of July, August, and September, the Company's
                minimum coverage requirement exceeded its $160 million fidelity
                bond by amounts ranging up to approximately $1.3 million.
                Effective September 27, 2006, the Company's fidelity bond was
                increased to $170 million.
1122(d)(3)(i)(A)The Asserting Party did not maintain or provide one of the
                required monthly reports stated in the transaction agreements
                during the year
1122(d)(3)(i)(D)The Asserting Party did not perform procedures to agree the
                unpaid principal balance and number of loans serviced by the
                Asserting Party with that of the investors or trustees

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/ Terence W. Edwards
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Mark Danahy
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Martin L. Foster
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President - Loan Servicing
<PAGE>

PETROMINERALS CORPORATION


EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION

I, Everett L. Hodges, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer of Petrominerals Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Petrominerals
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: 5/12/04

                  Everett L. Hodges
                  -----------------------
                  President, CEO &
                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned President of Stem Cell Therapy International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2009, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                
|------------------- |  | ---------------
|Date: July 10, 2009
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ David Stark
|                    |  | David Stark    
|                    |  | President
**CERTIFICATIONS**




I,
      Andrew
      Leszczynski, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-HE4 (the “Exchange Act periodic
      reports”);




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
      required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
      is
      included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.
      I am
      responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
      on
      my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
      compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
      AB,
      and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
      have
      fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and




5.
      All of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
      otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
      described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
      10-K.




In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC Mortgage Corporation, as servicer;
      LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as vendor; American Security Insurance
      Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Safeco Financial Institution
      Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.), each, as vendor; Wells Fargo
      Bank, N.A., as servicer; Regulus Group LLC, as vendor; and ZC Sterling Insurance
      Agency, Inc., as vendor.




Date:
      March 29, 2007




LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as master servicer




/s/
      Andrew Leszczynski


Andrew
      Leszczynski


First
      Vice President
#### INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC. and Communications Patents, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UA-COLUMBIA CABLEVISION OF WESTCHESTER, INC. and Telecommunications, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

Nos. 02-1248, 02-1249.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 30, 2002.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*434
      *ORDER*

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

UA-Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc. and Tele-Communications, Inc. move for reconsideration of the court’s July 31, 2002 order dismissing these appeals.

On January 3, 2002, the district court issued an order that construed a claim and held that the patent was infringed and invalid. The district court ordered the case “closed,” but later acknowledged that it had erred in terminating the case because there was a pending counterclaim regarding unenforceability. The district court determined that the counterclaim should be adjudicated and denied the parties’ joint motion to enter an appealable judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), regarding the claims relating to infringement and invalidity.

This court’s July 31 order was made in response to a letter from the appellants informing the court that the district court had denied their motion for entry of judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). It was not then clear that the defendants had decided to drop the pending counterclaim regarding unenforceability. Having now been so informed that the counterclaim had been dismissed, we agree that the appeals should be reinstated. *See CAE Screenplates Inc. v. Heinrich Fiedler GmbH & Co.,*224 F.3d 1308 (Fed.Cir. 2000); *McManus v. Gitano Group, Inc.,*59 F.3d 382 (2nd Cir.1995).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted and the appeals are reinstated.

(2) Appellants’ reply brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

# As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas L. Millner, certify that
this annual report on Form 10-K of Remington Arms Company, Inc. fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: March 23, 2005

/s/ Thomas L. MillnerThomas L. MillnerPresident and ChiefExecutive Officer
Exhibit 31


                               Certification

      Re:  New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1 (the "Trust" or the
          "Issuing Entity")

            I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on
Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
on Form 10-K/A of New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1 (the "Exchange
Act periodic reports");

            2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and, except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

            5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as
an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.
Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the unaffiliated parties listed on Schedule A
attached hereto.


<page>








                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE
                                        CORPORATION

                                         By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                         Name:  Kevin Cloyd
                                         Title: Executive Vice President








                                         Date:
   April 4, 2007

<page>
                               SCHEDULE A



1. Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust
   Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
2. American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
   and Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.
   (affiliates of Assurant, Inc.)
3. FIS Tax Services
#### In the Matter of Jimmy Frank Murphy, Bankrupt. Jimmy Frank MURPHY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee.

No. 74-4143.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 18, 1976.

See also, D.C., 355 F.Supp. 1235.

Hobdy G. Rains, Gadsden, Ala., for appellant.

Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Charles D. Stewart, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham,

Ala., Gilbert E. Andrews, Scott P. Cramp-ton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Crombie J. D. Garrett, Karl Schmeidler, Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Applte. Sec., Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this case the district court reversed a bankruptcy judge’s determination that a 100 percent penalty tax for withholding and F.I.C.A. taxes assessed against a responsible corporate officer, 26 U.S.C.A. § 6672 was a dischargeable debt, the collection of which was barred by the discharge granted to the officer in his personal bankruptcy proceeding. Having been adjudicated a bankrupt and released from all his dischargeable debts, the bankrupt filed an application seeking a determination of the discharge-ability of the tax assessments made against him. The bankrupt’s appeal from the adverse decision of the district court raises two issues of law: *first,*does the bankruptcy court have jurisdiction to determine the dischargeability of tax liability where the United States did not file a proof of claim in the bankruptcy proceeding, and second, *942did the district court correctly hold that'the tax liability of the bankrupt was not dis-chargeable in bankruptcy?

Jurisdiction is established by 1966 and 1970 amendments to the bankruptcy laws. 11 U.S.C.A. §§ ll(a)(2A) and 35(c). This Court has noted that the language of 11 U.S.C.A. § ll(a)(2A) conflicts with the report of the Senate Finance Committee. *In re Statmaster Corp.,*465 F.2d 978, 979-981 (5th Cir. 1972). *See In re Durensky,*519 F.2d 1024, 1025 n. 2 (5th Cir. 1975). In adhering to the language of the statute, we adopt the reasoning of Judge Mahon stated in his thorough opinion on the same issue in another case. *In re Durensky,*377 F.Supp. 798 (N.D.Tex.1974), *appeal dismissed,*519 F.2d 1024 (5th Cir. 1975). Our holding follows that of the Ninth Circuit where the Court stated:

> We hold that the Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction under § 35(a) and (c) to adjudicate the Bankrupt’s indebtedness for the federal income taxes due and owing by the Bankrupt, as determined under § ll(a)(2A), to be discharged in bankruptcy, notwithstanding the lack of a prior claim therefor or other proof thereof by IRS.

*Gwilliam v. United States,*519 F.2d 407, 412 (9th Cir. 1975). *See Bostwick v. United States,*521 F.2d 741 (8th Cir. 1975); *In re Century Vault Co.,*416 F.2d 1035 (3d Cir. 1969):

As to the second issue, we adopt the reasoning of Judge Allgood given in this instant case, where the court determined that the 26 U.S.C.A. § 6672 liability is, for purposes of the bankruptcy law, a nondischargeable tax governed by 11 U.S.C.A. § 35(a) rather than a dischargeable penalty which is governed by 11 U.S.C.A. § 93(j). *In re Murphy,*381 F.Supp. 813 (N.D.Ala. 1974).

AFFIRMED.
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

Nos. 07-1205 07-1398 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v . RENÉ VÁZQUEZ-BOTET, M.D. and MARCOS MORELL-CORRADA, Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 9, 2008, is amended as follows: On page 8, line 5: change "would" to "to." On page 51, line 7: change "stem" to "stems."
----

----

| (a)   | The      annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the      Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(b) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | Information      contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Caitlin      Jeffs      |   |   |   |   |
| Caitlin      JeffsPresident |   |   |   |   |

|                                           |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Caitlin      Jeffs                         |   |   |   |   |
| Caitlin      JeffsChief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |