alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PriceWaterHouseCoopers
                                                   PriceWaterHouseCoopers LLP
                                                   300 Madison Avenue
                                                   New York, NY 10017
                                                   Telephone (646) 471-3000
                                                   www.pwc.com


          Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Residential Capital, LLC:

We have examined management's assertion. Included in the accompanying
Managements Assertion Concerning Compliance with Regulation AB Item 122
Servicing Criteria, that GMAC Mortgage, LLC (the "Company"), a subsidiary of
Resident Capital, LLC, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the
GMACM Private Platform (the "Platform"), as of and for the year than ended
December 31,2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii); 1122(d)(2)(iv);
1122(d)(3)(i),(ii); and 1122(d)(4)(i),(ii), which the Company has determined
are not applicable to the servicing activities preformed by it with respect
to the Platform. Appendix A to managements assertion identifies the individual
asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting
the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company. compliance with the
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform,
and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions
and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company compiled with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, for the GMACM Private Platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.

/s/ PriceWaterHouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 5, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Note: This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  Ended  September  30, 1999 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001027574
<NAME>                        OUTSOURCING SOLUTIONS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              28,607
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       47,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                           706
<INVENTORY>                                         29,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   115,548
<PP&E>                                              79,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                      35,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     600,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              109,701
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         13,686
<COMMON>                                                53
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       600,921
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   380,063
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      352,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        76
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (10,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (11,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (11,244)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 02-60484

Summary Calendar

_______________________

JAMES W. DEATON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANN M. VENEMAN, SECRETARY, 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGENCY,

Defendant - Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

Lower Docket No. 1:01-CV-53-B-A

_________________________________________________________________

January 6, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The pro se appellant challenges the district court’s

grant of summary judgment to the Agriculture Department in his suit
2

brought for termination of employment. Deaton argues that he is

entitled to default judgment, that the district court judge should

have recused himself, and that the district court erred in granting

the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because the appellant

does not cite any legal authority or comprehensible legal arguments

in support of his position, and his brief does not even grapple

with the issues of res judicata and collateral estoppel on which

the court based its decision, this court considers the challenges

abandoned for being inadequately briefed. L&A Contracting Co. v.

S. Concrete Servs., Inc., 17 F.3d 106, 113 (5th Cir. 1994); F.R.A.P.

28(a)(9)(A).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  I, Daniel
Imperato, certify that:
  1.           I
have reviewed this Amendment #1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Imperiali,
Inc.;
  2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:  May
      1, 2009
                /s/Daniel
      ImperatoDaniel
      ImperatoPrincipal
      Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, Department of

the Army; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; U.S.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 35711

D.C. No. 6:19

- cv

- 00149

- MK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VAND Y KE, Circuit Judges.

Hamid Michael Hejazi appeals pro se from the district court ’ s j udgment

dismissing his employment action alleging discrimination . We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 35711

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for

failure to serve the summons and complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4(m). Oy ama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan) , 253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001). We

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Hejazi’s action

because Hejazi failed to effect proper service of the summons and complaint after

being given not ice and opportunities and directives to do so and failed to show

good cause for his failure to serve

. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (outlining the

requirements for proper service and explaining that a district court may dismiss for

failure to serve after provi ding notice and absent a showing of good cause for

failure to serve); In re Sheehan , 253 F.3d at 512

- 13 (discussing good cause and the

district court’s broad discretion to dismiss an action).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penn-Pacific  Corp., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,  Rose
Fischer,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Accounting  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: May 10, 2005



/s/ Rose Fischer
Rose Fischer
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19977]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than September 12, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, 
Director, Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. NHB Holdings, Inc., and Proficio Mortgage Ventures, LLC, to 
engage de novo in a joint venture with Mainsail Capital and Trinity 
Venture Partners, all of Jacksonville, Florida, in conducting mortgage 
banking activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 25, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-19977 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

      I, Zhenyong Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Orient Paper Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Transition Report on Form 10-K/A for the transition period of
Orient Paper Inc. (the "Registrant") from March 1, 2007 through December 31,
2007 resulting from the change of the Company's fiscal year end from February 28
to December 31 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

      (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: October 8, 2008                         /s/ Zhenyong Liu
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  Zhenyong Liu
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WHERLAND v. CROWELL LONG LEAF LUMBER CO. et al.

No. 2808.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

July 30, 1946.

For former opinion, see 26 So.2d 712.

Gist, Thornton & Murchison, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Wood & Wood, of Leesville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

In their application for rehearing, counsel for defendants direct our attention to-an error in the opinion handed down in this, case when it was stated that plaintiff had’ remained in the hospital “the usual length: of time after such an operation” following the operation performed on him for correction of a hernia on October 4, 1944. The-testimony shows that he was in the hospital! from October 4, 1944, to November 6,. 1944, a period of four weeks and two days,, where as Dr. Rand, the surgeon who performed the operation, states that “most of' the time patients from such operations are-kept in the hospital for about two weeks.”' Conceding that a mistake was made in stating the plaintiff stayed in the hospital “the-usual length of time” following a hernia, operation, that would have no effect on what we held were the ultimate results of the operation.

*185It is positive however, as shown by Dr. ■Rand’s own testimony, that plaintiff was permitted to leave the hospital on November 6, 1944. Plaintiff and his wife both swear positively that on that day, Dr. Rand told them that the operation was successful and Dr. Rand himself admits that he “may have said” that to them. Several weeks later plaintiff stopped to see the doctor in Alexandria and was examined by him. He says that after the examination Dr. Rand told him he could go back to work. Dr. Rand remembers this visit and the examination and when questioned regarding the statement plaintiff said he had made about his going back to work he says he “does not know about that.” Asked if he would deny it he answers: “No. I don’t remember.” Absolutely then the proof fav■ors the plaintiff on this very important point for if Dr. Rand had had all the apprehension he now says he had about the ■success of the operation he certainly would not have advised this man to go back to work at that time.

All of this is what prompted the further statement in the opinion that Dr. Rand tried to impress the court that he was not satisfied with the results of the operation and used the expression that “he was disappointed.” We merely were quoting the doctor’s words and stating our reaction to his testimony as a whole and how anyone could imply from the language used the thought that Dr. Rand was endeavoring to deceive the court, we are unable to conceive. We readily accept counsel’s endorsement of the doctor’s eminent qualifications as a surgeon and his high moral character as an individual.

We have carefully reconsidered the case and remain convinced of the correctness of the judgment of the lower court which we affirmed in the opinion previously handed down.

Rehearing will be refused.
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
          connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB/A of
          Loma Verde Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30,
          2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
          hereof,
          I, Virgilio Santana, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer
          and
          Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
          to
          Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
          knowledge
          and belief:


1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.





September
          1, 2006


VIRGILIO
      SANTANA


Virgilio
      Santana


Chief
      Accounting Officer, Chief


Financial
      Officer and Director












-1-
|Exhibit 12                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Peoples Energy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies             
|                                                                
|Statement Re:  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|(Dollars in Thousands)                                          
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Net Income Before Preferred                                     
|Stock Dividends, as reported                                    
|                                                                
|Change in undistributed earnings from equity investees          
|                                                                
|Add - Income Taxes                                              
|Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest                    
|                                                                
|Earnings                                                        
|                                                                
|Fixed charges including capitalized interest                    
|                                                                
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges