alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Inbound Direct Entry Contracts

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Postal Service notice of filing a request with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission to add Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with 
Foreign Postal Administrations to the Competitive Products List 
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3).

DATES: August 27, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret M. Falwell, 703-292-3576

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice that it has filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of United States Postal Service to Add Inbound Direct Entry 
Contracts with Foreign Postal Administrations to the Competitive 
Product List, and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) the Enabling Governor's 
Decision and Two Functionally Equivalent Contracts with Foreign Posts. 
Documents are available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2008-6, 
CP2008-14, and CP2008-15.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E8-19801 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Tony L. White
------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 14, 2003
#### Ike LA HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ORIENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4463.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1934.

Hardin & Coleman, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Pegues & Pegues, of Mansfield, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case of ease No. 4458 on the docket of this court, 156 So. 366, de-' cided this day.

Eor the reasons assigned in case No. 4458, the judgment of the lower court in this case is reversed, and the demands of plaintiff are rejected, at his cost in both courts.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10494

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Oscar Daniel Rios Benitez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-1-1

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Oscar Daniel Rios Benitez appeals his 18-month, within-guidelines 

sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Rios Benitez asserts that 

the district court plainly erred by characterizing his prior Texas conviction 

for assault-family violence under Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(a)(1), 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10494 Document: 00515700577 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2021
No. 20-10494

2

(b)(2) as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16 and, thus, as an aggravated 

felony pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). He 

contends that Texas assault-family violence does not qualify as an aggravated 

felony because it can be committed recklessly. The Government moves for 

summary affirmance, asserting that Rios Benitez’s argument is foreclosed by 

United States v. Gracia-Cantu, 920 F.3d 252 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 

157 (2019). 

As Rios Benitez correctly concedes, his argument is foreclosed. See

Gracia-Cantu, 920 F.3d at 253–55 (holding that assault causing bodily injury 

under Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(a)(1) and (b)(2) is a crime of 

violence under § 16(a)). He raises the issue only to preserve it for future 

review. Consequently, the Government is “clearly right as a matter of law,”

such that “there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the 

case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. The 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED AS MOOT.

Case: 20-10494 Document: 00515700577 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2021
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

To:                                               Chris Walther, Chief Legal Officer

 

From:                                 Jeffrey A. Brown, Corporate Secretary

 

Date:                                    December 22, 2011

 

Re:                                               Notice of Assignment of Employment Agreement

to Activision Blizzard, Inc.

 

This letter is to inform you that effective January 1, 2012, Activision Publishing, Inc. (“Activision Publishing”) hereby assigns all of its rights, title and interest in your employment agreement to Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision Blizzard” or “Company”), and Activision Blizzard hereby accepts such assignment in its entirety including without limitation all of Activision Publishing obligations thereunder.

 

As a result of this change, you will see a change in your payroll documentation (e.g. paystubs, W-2’s, etc.), which will now be administered by Activision Blizzard beginning January 1, 2012.  Specifically, the governmental reporting entity listed on this documentation will change from Activision Publishing to Activision Blizzard.

 

Although consent of such assignment is not required pursuant to the terms of your employment agreement, the Company is requesting your signature below as acknowledgment of receipt of this letter.  Please return a signed original to Raluca Roman in HR Operations, and a copy will be returned to you for your records and the signed original placed in your personnel file.

 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding the above, please feel free to contact me at xt. 2030.

 

Acknowledged by:

 

	
/s/ Chris B. Walther
    	
 
    	
12/22/2011
    
	
Employee Name
    	
 
    	
Date
    


 

cc:  Personnel File
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000075448
<NAME> NSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                       243
<INVENTORY>                                      5,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,795
<PP&E>                                           6,916<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     329<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           934
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,582
<SALES>                                          9,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,034
<CGS>                                            5,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    304
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
<FN>
<F1>Includes $5,585 of goodwill and other intangible assets.
<F2>Includes $160 in accumulated amortization related to goodwill and other
intangible assets.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Barry J. Feld, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Portrait Corporation of America, Inc. (the“Registrant”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Portrait Corporation of America, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
FORM 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial staements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         4415000
<SECURITIES>                                  17654000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 30794000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1019000
<INVENTORY>                                   33269000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              89461000
<PP&E>                                        95279000
<DEPRECIATION>                                39557000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               164060000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         46361000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        142000
<OTHER-SE>                                    97606000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 164060000
<SALES>                                       41789000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              41789000
<CGS>                                         24931000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 24931000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              12978000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              675000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3903000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1310000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2593000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2593000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
?!immc A%??4YmRhiEY GENEWAL 

OF %-EXAS 

Overruled by: 

Willis v. Potts 

377 SW 2d 622 

Aus~rr. TEXAS 7s71P ~~~~~ sup. ct. 

February 

Hon. T. 0. Waltbn, President 

A & M College 

College Station, Texas 

. . 

Dear Dr. Walton: 

23, 1939 

See.letter to Calvert 

dated 3/27/56 by John 

Reeves. 

Opinion No. O-371 

Ri: Members o3.A. & M. 

College staff may 

serve as town 

officers In the 

town of College 

Station. 

..Your Inquiry of February 15th re-subm$ts the questions, *Can 

members af A. & M. College staff serve as towowni officers of the 

town of College Station? 

Article 16, Section 33, of the Constitution states: 

"The accounting officers of.this State shall neither draw nor 

pay a warret upon the Treasury in favor of any'person for 

salary or compensation as agent, officer, or appointee who holds 

at the same time any other office or position of honor, trust 

or profit-pder this State or the United States, except as 

prescribed in this Constitution." 

Article 16, Section 40, of the Constltut~lon provides: 

"No person shall hold or exercise at the same time more than 

one civil office of emolument." 

There are no dec,lslons of the Texas courts directly In point. 

However, the Supreme Court of this State, In Kimbrough v. 

.Barnett, 93 Tex.,301, deflned."public office" as, "The ,rlght, 

authority and duty created and conferred by law, by which, for 

a given period, either fixed by law or enduring at the pleasure 

of the creating power, an Individual 1s Invested with some 

portion of the aoverelgn functions of the goverffment, to be 

exerc.@ed by him for the benefit of the public. 

In Leymel v. Johnson, 288 Pac. 858,.the.Dlstrlct Court of 

Appeal of the State of California had,befoTe It the question 

as to whether a schbol teacher was an officer, and after quoting , 
Hon. T. 0. Walton, page 2 O-371 

,, .~ 

i&m'Klmiroigh v. BarneM; kpra, and after eulogizing the 

teaching profession at length, 'holds that a teacher Is not an: 

officer under the St&e. - 

In Green v. Owen, 31 S. W. (2d) 1037, the Supreme Court of the 

State of Mlssourl heldr 

"The right of the __ _ . office of City .Attorney. of a municipality 

Qoes not involve the title to any office uqder the State. The 

office of,City Attorney of a city Is not an offlce.under this 

State, but an dffice under the city.", 

We therefore answer that members of the colle 

prohibited .by Sections 33,'and 40 of Article 1 fi 

e staff are not 

of the State 

Co;;;;utlon:,from holding office yder'the town of College 

. 

The ,Opinlon Fendered by this Department on December 10, 1938, 

Iti hereby overruled and withdrawn. 

Yours very truly 

ATTOFINEY GENERAL OF !l?EXAS 

'. 

ASRsPBPr&sCffE 

APPROVEDx 

By /s/ A. 5.' Roll+8 

A. 5. Roll,l~~s 

Asslstant 

/s/ oerald C... Mann 

A!C!~'OR.~@XQENERALCFTEXAS 

(..
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 

 
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTI, Jimmy S.H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to Section 906 of the*Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002*, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe *Securities Exchange Act of 1934*(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated:November 25, 2005           /s/ Jimmy S.H. Lee         Jimmy S.H. Lee    Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MercerInternational Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(No. 23526.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*Charles H. Chapin *et al.*Defendants in Error.

*Opinion filed October 14, 1936.*

Otto Kerner, Attorney General, A. H. Greening, State’s Attorney, and A. B. Dennis, for the People.

Brown, Hay & Stephens, (R. Allan Stephens, Robert A. Stephens, Jr., and Robert W. Williamson, of counsel,) for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Farthing

delivered the opinion of the court:

Charles H. Chapin, whose death has been suggested on the record, and the remaining defendants in error, Jay Chapin and John J. Chapin, were indicted at the September, 1935) term of the circuit court of Sangamon county. That court quashed the indictment, and the People have sued out this writ of rror.

The indictment charged that the defendants were the directors, officers, stockholders and owners of the Wilson Oil Company, a corporation; that they controlled all of its business operations and activities and were engaged in •the business of transporting motor fuel into the State of Illinois and of selling and distributing motor fuel in Chicago under the authority of a distributor’s license issued to them in the name of the Wilson Oil Company; that during the period of time named, the defendants, in the name of that company, etc., collected taxes due the State of lili*320nois from purchasers in the sum of $9943.98; that they deducted $198.88 therefrom as expenses of collecting and paying over the tax mentioned; that the Department of Finance demanded of the defendants “so doing business in the name of and by and through the said Wilson Oil Company, a corporation,” the balance of $9745.10, but that the defendants refused, failed and neglected to pay the money, and “unlawfully, wrongfully and feloniously embezzled and converted said taxes, money and funds to their own use.”

A similar indictment was condemned in our decision in *People*v. Strong, 363 Ill. 602, and for the reasons there stated the judgment of the circuit court of Sangamon county is affirmed.

*, Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6516 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6516

To provide for the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation to make grants 
  to carry out neighborhood revitalization activities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2022

Mrs. Bustos (for herself and Mr. Katko) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation to make grants 
  to carry out neighborhood revitalization activities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neighborhood Reinvestment and 
Revitalization Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION GRANTS.

    (a) Authority.--The Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (in this 
section referred to as the ``Corporation''), established under the 
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 8101 et seq.), 
shall carry out a program under this section to make grants to its own 
charter members to support neighborhood revitalization activities, 
including demolition and rehabilitation of abandoned and distressed 
properties, to be carried out in areas having concentrations of such 
properties.
    (b) Use Guidelines.--Amounts from grants under the program under 
this section shall be used in accordance with guidelines established by 
the Corporation consistent with the authority under section 606(a)(5) 
of the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 
8105(a)(5)).
    (c) Competition Guidelines.--Grants under this section may be made 
only on a competitive basis in accordance with competition guidelines, 
which shall be established by the Corporation.
    (d) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
that amounts are first appropriated to carry out this section, the 
Corporation shall submit to the Congress a report regarding the program 
for grants under this section that shall include--
            (1) the guidelines for use of grants established pursuant 
        to subsection (b); and
            (2) the guidelines for competition for grants established 
        pursuant to subsection (c).
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Corporation $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2022 for 
grants under this section.
                                 <all>
```