alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, CATHY S. LUSK, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals

District of the State of Texas, do hereby certify that Nacogdoches Heart Clinic, P.A. and

Prabhakar R. Guniganti, M.D., Plaintiffs in the trial court secured an extension of ninety-three

(93) days in which to file Appellants’ Brief in the following numbered and entitled cause:

Nacogdoches Heart Clinic, P.A., Prabhakar R. Guniganti, M.D. and East Texas

Cardiovascular Labs, LLC, Appellants/Cross-Appellees

No. 12-11-00133-CV vs.

Vijay R. Pokala, M.D. d/b/a Nacogdoches Cardiac Center Center, Appellee/Cross- Appellant

This certificate is made pursuant to Tex. Rev. Civ. State. Ann. art. 5069, 1.05 sec. 3(c)

(Vernon Supp. 1985) to assist the Clerk of the Trial Court in calculating the amount of postjudgment interest accrued.

WITNESS MY HAND and seal of said Court at Tyler, Texas, this 20th day of May 2015,

A.D.

Respectfully yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: ______________________________

 Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4090

___________ Eric Randall Nance, * * Petitioner/Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas Larry Norris, Director, * Arkansas Department of * [PUBLISHED] Correction, * * Respondent/Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 22, 2005 Filed: November 22, 2005

___________ Before ARNOLD, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Before the court is respondent's motion to vacate a stay of execution entered by the district court. We gran t the motion and vacate the stay. On November 14, 2005, pe titioner filed a pleading captioned "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus" accompanied by a motion for stay of execu tion. The district court1 On January 23, 2003, the district court denied habeas relief and dismissed CV00339. We affirmed this action on December 10, 2004. Our mandate issued on October 12, 2005. The case is closed. -2- construed the petition as a requested amendment to the previously filed 1 petition in district court, case number: 5:00-CV-00339 (" CV-00339"). The district court, after making findings of fact and conclusions of law, granted a motion to amend the habeas corpus petition, and granted the stay of execution. On January 24, 2005, petitioner filed a petition to remand in CV:00339 seeking the same relief sought in the present filings. Construing the motion to remand as a motion to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2244 habeas petition, we denied the motion. We view the present filings as yet anothe r attempt to avoid the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, we deny a motion for interlocutory appeal, vacate the district court's stay of execution and dismiss the petition for habeas corpus.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029300
<NAME> CFC SERVICES CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,186
<INVENTORY>                                     68,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,105
<PP&E>                                          87,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### James R. VANDERPOOL, Michele L. Root, Richard L. Roberts, Thomas J. Funke, William E. Fisher, and Donald A. McMullen, Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

No. 02-3374.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 29, 2002.

Order Vacated, See 2002 WL 31684824.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 21, 2015 

# Order

April 2 1 , 2015

150725 ( 195 ) (198)

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, Minor, by and

through ERIC BRAVERMAN, Conservator

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, and

KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK

, Plaintiff,

v

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., and WILLIAM

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL

, Defendant s

- Appell ants,

and

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF GYNECOLOGY

AND OBSTETRICS, P.C.,

Defendant. SC: 150725

COA: 309680

Oakland CC: 2006

- 074585

- NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motion s of the Michigan Defense Trial

Counsel and the Michigan Association for Justice to participate as amic i curiae are

GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted by the Michigan Association for Justice on

April 14, 2015, is accepted for filing. An amicus brief from the Michigan Defense Trial

Counsel will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before May 7, 2015.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2023

No. 04-22-00778-CR

EX PARTE Hernan Hernandez RUBIO

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12252CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 25, 2023, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting a thirty-day 

extension of time to file his reply brief. After consideration, we grant the motion and order 

appellant to file his reply by March 1, 2023. Further requests for extensions of time will be 

disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on January 26, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13165-000]


FFP Ohio River 13, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

August 21, 2008.
    On April 15, 2008, FFP Ohio River 13, LLC each filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Ohio River 10 and Ohio River 
13 Projects, to be located on the Ohio River in Clark County, Indiana 
and Oldham County, Kentucky.
    The proposed Ohio River 13 Project consists of: (1) 2,850 proposed 
20 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total installed 
capacity of 57 megawatts, (2) a proposed transmission line, and (3) 
appurtenant facilities. The FFP Ohio River 13, LLC, project would have 
an average annual generation of 249.66 gigawatt-hours and be sold to a 
local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Dan Irvin, FFP Ohio River 13, LLC, 69 Bridge 
Street, Manchester, MA 01944, (978) 232-3536.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13165) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19936 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6578 

To direct the Secretary of State to seek to enter into negotiations with 

the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office to rename its 

office the ‘‘Taiwan Representative Office’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2022 

Mr. CURTIS (for himself and Mr. PAPPAS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of State to seek to enter into negotiations with the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office to rename its office the ‘‘Taiwan Representative Office’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taiwan Representative 

5 Office Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6578 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF AND REFERENCES TO TAIWAN 

2 REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE. 

3 (a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It shall be the policy 

4 of the United States, consistent with the Taiwan Relations 

5 Act (22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) and the Six Assurances, to 

6 provide the people of Taiwan with de facto diplomatic 

7 treatment equivalent to foreign countries, nations, states, 

8 governments, or similar entities, and, consistent with this 

9 policy, to rename the ‘‘Taipei Economic and Cultural Rep10 resentative Office’’ in the United States as the ‘‘Taiwan 

11 Representative Office’’. 

12 (b) RENAMING.—The Secretary of State shall seek 

13 to enter into negotiations with the Taipei Economic and 

14 Cultural Representative Office to rename its office in 

15 Washington, DC, the ‘‘Taiwan Representative Office’’. 

16 (c) REFERENCES.—If the Taipei Economic and Cul17 tural Representative Office is designated as the Taiwan 

18 Representative Office, any reference in a law, map, regula19 tion, document, paper, or other record of the United 

20 States Government to the Taipei Economic and Cultural 

21 Representative Office shall be deemed to be a reference 

22 to the Taiwan Representative Office, including for all offi23 cial purposes of the Government of the United States, all 

24 courts of the United States, and any proceedings therein. 

25 (d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec26 tion shall be construed as entailing restoration of diploVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:29 Feb 07, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6578.IH H6578

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6578 IH

1 matic relations with the Republic of China (Taiwan) or 

2 altering the position of the United States with respect to 

3 the international status of Taiwan. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6534 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit transplant centers from 

discriminating against an individual seeking an organ on the basis of 

whether the individual is vaccinated against COVID–19, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2022 

Mr. CLINE (for himself, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. ROY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit transplant centers from discriminating against an individual 

seeking an organ on the basis of whether the individual 

is vaccinated against COVID–19, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Arduous Vaccine 

5 Enforcement Act of 2022’’ or the ‘‘SAVE Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6534 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO DISCRIMINATION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION 

2 ON BASIS OF COVID–19 VACCINATION STA3 TUS. 

4 Section 372(b)(2) of the Public Health Service Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 274(b)(2)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (N), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (O), by striking the period 

9 at the end and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(P) prohibit a transplant center from treating 

13 an individual as ineligible to donate or receive an 

14 organ, assigns a lower priority to an individual to re15 ceive an organ, or otherwise discriminates against an 

16 individual seeking to donate or receive an organ, on 

17 the basis of whether the individual is vaccinated 

18 (partially or fully) against COVID–19.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUSTIN CHARLES GREEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 197 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Kevin G. Moug, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Kevin G. MougKevin G. MougChief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 9, 2004
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00350
- CV

T. Y. J., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 16
- 005029 , THE HONORABLE ORLI NDA NAR ANJO, JUDGE PRESIDIN G

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant T. Y. J. filed her notice of appeal on May 17, 2018 . The appellate record was complete June 26, 2018 , making appellant’s brief due July 16, 2018

. On July 19, 2018 , counsel for appellant filed a moti on for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days fo r court’s final dispos ition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order counsel to file appellant’s brief no
later than August 3, 2018 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on July 23, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PATRICK HUFF

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3750

[ March 3, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562017CF000792A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez

Orosa, Senior A ssistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Kovaleski v. State , 103 So. 3d 859, 861 (Fla. 2012) (holding that partial courtroom closure pursuant to section 918.16(2), Fla. Stat., complied with the Waller test) (ci ting Waller v. Georgia , 467 U.S. 39, 48, 104 S.Ct. 2210, 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984)).

L EVINE

, C.J., G ROSS and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 35.2

                         Servicer Compliance Statement
            for American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., as Servicer



                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
                     American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
                          GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-6

     I, David M. Friedman,  a duly authorized  officer of American Home Mortgage
Servicing,  Inc.,  as servicer (the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the Mortgage Loan
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2005, by and among Goldman
Sachs  Mortgage  Company,  the Servicer and American  Home Mortgage  Corp.  (the
"Agreement"), hereby certify that:

     1. A  review  of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  from and
including  January  1,  2006  through  and  including  December  31,  2006  (the
"Reporting  Period") and of the Servicer's  performance  under the Agreement and
any  applicable  Reconstitution  Agreement  (as  such  term  is  defined  in the
Agreement) has been made under my supervision.

     2. To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such  review,  the  Servicer has
fulfilled  all of  its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  and  any  applicable
Reconstitution  Agreement  (as such term is  defined  in the  Agreement)  in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
12th day of March, 2007.


                                        By:    /s/ David M. Friedman
                                               ------------------------
                                        Name:  David M. Friedman
                                        Title: Executive Vice President
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-16 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
EXHIBIT 23.1




Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm





Legacy Reserves
LP





Midland,
TX




We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-149251 and 333-150111) and Form S-8 (No. 333-144586) of Legacy Reserves LP
of our reports dated March 5, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and the effectiveness of Legacy Reserves LP’s internal control over
financial reporting appearing in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP Houston, TXMarch 5,
2010




---