alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0641

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GILBERT CAMPA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 3 2023

05/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0641
|                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                            |  |
|                                                                       |
|                                                                       |   |
| /s/ Thomas C. Chubb III                                                    |   |
| Thomas C. Chubb III                                                        |   |
| Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President                            |   |
| September 2, 2016                                                     |   |
|                                                                       |   |
| /s/ K. Scott Grassmyer                                                     |   |
| K. Scott Grassmyer                                                         |   |
| Executive Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Controller |   |
| September 2, 2016                                                     |   |
#### Bessie M. V. Caffry, as Executrix of Frank L. Caffry, Deceased, Appellant, v. John L. Wilkie, as Executor, etc., of John W. Caffry, Deceased, and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Bessie M. V. Caffry.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### Curtis E. RANSBOTTOM et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY et al., Defendants-appellees.

No. 6459.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 2, 1942.

Rehearing Denied June 23, 1942.

Peterman, Hunter & Neilson, of Alexandria, for appellants.

Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellees,

HAMITER, Judge.

For the reasons given in Hardy v. National Mutual Casualty Co., 9 So.2d 346, this day decided by us, the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCA International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Norsworthy, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:    December 18, 2002





By:

/S/    DONALD NORSWORTHYDonald NorsworthyExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
#### SCHMIDERET et al. v. HARDOUIN.*

No. 16135.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 27, 1936.

Harold J. Moore, of New Orleans, for appellants.

L. W. Cockfield, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

*

 Rehearing denied Feb. 10, 1936.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit for rent for the months of October, November, and December, 1932, and January, February, and March, 1933, at the rate of $32.50, for March 1935, at $30, and a balance on April, 1933, rent of $5, or a total of $230. There was judgment below in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s demand as in case of nonsuit.

It appears from the record that the rent for the months for which this suit was instituted was paid, a fact which counsel for plaintiff, in oral argument, conceded, but it is contended that the record also indicates that there was some rent due for other months, and that we should give judgment for the amount shown to be due. Without commenting upon whether there is proof of defendant’s indebtedness on some account *330not covered by the pleadings, we are of opinion that such indebtedness, if it exists, should be the subject of another suit, as it forms no part of the issue in this case.

The defendant has asked that the judgment of nonsuit be changed to a judgment dismissing plaintiff's suit, and we believe that this amendment should be made.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is amended so as to run in favor of the defendant, Rudolph Hardouin, Jr., dismissing the suit of plaintiffs at their cost.

Amended; suit dismissed.
FILED

July 8, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON 

STATE OF TENNESSEE ) FOR PUBLICATION

)

) NO. 02-S-01-9112-CR-00064

V . )

)

) SHELBY COUNTY

DAVID KEEN )

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

O n May 23, 1994, th is Court affirmed petitioner's

conviction for first-degree murder and remanded the cause for resentencing.

Subsequently, the petitioner filed a timely petition

pursuant to Rule 39, Tenn. R. App. P. for a rehearing.

We grant the petition to rehear and remand the cause to

the trial court for the conduct of a sentencing hearing consonant

with our holding in State v. Richard Odom .

Enter this the _____ day of ______________, 1996.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Anna Herbst, the President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Anna HerbstPresident Date: May 15, 2007
Exhibit 34.1.7.1

 

[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board Members

Regulus Group LLC:

 

We have examined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivable portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/_KPMG LLP

 

Philadelphia, PA

February 22, 2007
| **Note 11 - Segment and Geographic Information (Details)** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Segment Reporting [Abstract]**                           |           |           |
| Number of Reportable Segments                              | 1              | 2              |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of segments reported by the entity. A reportable segment is a component of an entity for which there is an accounting requirement to report separate financial information on that component in the entity's financial statements.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NumberOfReportableSegments**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_SegmentReportingAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### MURRAY v. YAZOO & M. V. R. CO.

No. 1885.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1938.

For prior opinion, see 183 So. 543.

Rownd & Tycer and Reid & Reid, all of .Hammond, for appellant.

Carroll Buck, of Amite, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An application for rehearing was filed in this case on October 21st, 1938, and a motion has been filed by the Ap-pellee to dismiss the said application or ignore the same as having been filed too late. Notice of the judgment of this Court was received by Counsel for Appellant on October 6th, 1938, from which date the delay for filing an application for a rehearing is to be counted. Section 24, Article 7, Constitution of 1921.

Act No. 16 of 1910 provides that judgments of the Courts of Appeal shall become final and executory on the fifteenth calendar day after rendition (after service of notice under the Constitution) unless the last day shall fall on a legal holiday, when the delay shall be extended to the first day thereafter not a legal holiday; provided that in the interval parties in interest shall have the right to apply for a rehearing. The fifteenth calendar day after notice was served in this case was October 21st, 1938, the day on which the application was filed, and on that day, according to the terms of the Act, the judgment had become final and executory. The last day for filing the application was October 20th, 1938, which was not a legal holiday, and no extension of the time after that day was permitted.

Excluding the day on which the notice was served and the day on which the application was filed, fourteen days were allowed in which to file the application. From October 7th to 20th, irtclusive, was the period given in which to .file the application — the last day for filing, being the 20th and not the 21st on which it was filed. See O. K. Realty Co., Inc., v. John A. Juliani, Inc., 157 La. 277, 102 So. 399.

Therefore the application *comes too*late and it cannot be considered.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of ThePep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ending May 3, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),

 

I, Michael R. Odell, Interim Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(i)                                   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:  June 11, 2008 | by: /s/ Michael R. Odell   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                           | Michael R. Odell                |
|                           | Interim Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6673 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6673

 To authorize appropriations for Operation Stonegarden, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2022

  Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations for Operation Stonegarden, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Border Operations Strengthened by 
Stonegarden Act'' or the ``BOSS Act''.

SEC. 2. OPERATION STONEGARDEN APPROPRIATIONS AND TRUST FUND.

    There is authorized to be appropriated for each of fiscal years 
2022 through 2025 $180,000,000 for the Operation Stonegarden grant 
program of the Department of Homeland Security, and not less than 
$60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2025 to procure 
technology and equipment, including communications equipment, sensors, 
and drone technology.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | 1. | I              have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sonic Solutions;              and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   | 2. | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                                                                  |                                |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Date:                July 26, 2006 | By:                                                                                                         | /s/                A. Clay Leighton |
|                               | A.                Clay LeightonExecutive                  Vice President and Chief Financial                  Officer |

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending May 5, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),

I,Jeffrey C. Rachor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(i)                                     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date:  June 13, 2007 | by: /s/ Jeffrey C. Rachor |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                      | Jeffrey C. Rachor              |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

----
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6233 

To extend the period for adjustment of status for certain Liberian nationals, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. PHILLIPS (for himself and Mr. CICILLINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the period for adjustment of status for certain 

Liberian nationals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Liberian Refugee Fair5 ness Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STA7 TUS FOR CERTAIN LIBERIAN NATIONALS. 

8 Section 7611(b)(1)(A) of the National Defense Au9 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (8 U.S.C. 1255 note; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6233 IH

1 Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘3 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EX-35 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-7

Per Section 13.04 of the Master Servicing and Trust Agreement, dated as of
4/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(i)     a review of the activities of such Person during the preceding calendar
        year (or applicable portion thereof) and of the performance of the
        Master Servicer under this Agreement, or in the case of a Servicer or
        subservicer, the applicable Servicing Agreement, has been made under
        such officer's supervision and

(ii)    to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        Person has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or in
        the case of a Servicer or subservicer, the applicable Servicing
        Agreement, in all material respects throughout such year (or applicable
        portion thereof.), or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such
        obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure known
        to such officer and the nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
          connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB/A of
          Mortlock Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the period from September 19, 2005
          (date of inception) to June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
          Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof, I, William Timmins, Chief Accounting Officer,
          Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
          1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that, to the best of my knowledge and
          belief:


1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








September
                  12, 2006
      WILLIAM
              TIMMINS
    William
          Timmins


Chief
      Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director







-1-