alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
       This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
       Liquidating Trust's statement of net assets in liquidation at June 30,
       1999 and the Liquidating Trust's statement of changes in net assets in
       liquidation for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999, and is
       qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            138,212
<SECURITIES>                                       96,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    234,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              38,153
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        196,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      234,597
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,061
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (78)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    11,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                11,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       11,731
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .22


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6386 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6386

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, as the ``Veterans 
        of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2022

  Mr. Krishnamoorthi (for himself, Ms. Newman, Mr. Danny K. Davis of 
 Illinois, Mr. Schneider, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Kinzinger, Mr. 
   Bost, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Casten, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
Foster, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Quigley, Mr. 
  Rush, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Underwood, and Mr. LaHood) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, as the ``Veterans 
        of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VETERANS OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Veterans 
of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Wayne
McAlister, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 220, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2008 |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ G. Wayne McAlister 
|                     |  | G. Wayne McAlister     
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ JOSEPH A. MOLINO, JR.    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A. Molino, Jr.        |   |
| Principal Financial  Officer |   |
| November 10, 2006            |   |

 

----
#### Ngu LUU; Helen Ng, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72903. Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 24, 2003.

*660Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ngu Luu and his wife, Helen Ng,1 natives and citizens of China, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual determinations concerning a petitioner’s eligibility for asylum, and must uphold them unless the evidence compels a contrary result. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 *&*n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

Luu testified that he was detained and beaten by communist Vietnamese in Vietnam during 1967, because he provided intelligence information regarding the North Vietnamese to the United States government.

Luu provided no evidence of past persecution by the Chinese government and therefore substantial evidence supports the denial of his asylum application. *See Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir.2000) (stating standard).

Luu also testified that he fears the Chinese government will persecute him because he provided intelligence information to the United States in 1967. This evidence does not compel the conclusion that Luu has a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Prasad v. INS,*47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir.1995) (stating standard). Accordingly, Luu is not eligible for asylum.

Luu, in failing to qualify for asylum, necessarily failed to satisfy the more stringent standard required to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Pedro-Mateo v. INS,*224 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.2000).

Luu’s contention that the BIA’s failure to address his claim under Article 3 of the United Nation’s Convention Against Torture violates due process is unavailing because there is no evidence in the record that Luu raised this claim with the IJ.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Ng’s asylum application is derivative of her husband’s claim.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Liquidating Trust's statement of net assets in liquidation at June 30, 2000
and the Liquidating Trust's statement of changes in net assets in
liquidation for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1,000

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                                  123,306
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                123,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          36,282
<BONDS>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     87,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  123,306
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                3,554
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (.03)


</TABLE>
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 06-14-00050-CR OFFENSE: 32.21

Chad Ray Bennett v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Hunt

¥*/-/r

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 354th District Court

DATE: 3/12/15 Publish: No TC CASE #: 29,345

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Chad Ray Bennett v. The St

STYLE: Texas

ate of

Petition

CCA#: Ti/~/5

PRO S£.

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

f?e-fused JUDGE:

DATE: OSt/3/30/y

JUDGE: /£a U>tsuc*~^

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### Sidney Joseph MORALES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC PARISH COMMITTEE OF ST. BERNARD PARISH et al., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 16300.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 5, 1935.

J. Bernard Cocke and Bertrand I. Cahn,. both of New Orleans, for appellants.

Lawrence W. Bergeron and John R.. Perez, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded by counsel that the issues-presented here cannot be distinguished from those which confronted the Supreme Court in the matter entitled Paul Adolph Brown, v. Democratic Parish Committee of St. Bernard Parish et al., 165 So. 167, and in. various other cases decided by the Supreme Court in the same opinion and decree rendered in the Brown Case on December 3, 1935,

For the reasons assigned by the Supreme Court in that case, it is ordered, adjudged,, and decreed that the judgment appealed, from be affirmed.

Affirmed.
|   | **Exhibit 32.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Plasmatech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **Marvin Williams**, Chief Executive Officer Principal Accounting Officer of the            Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **MARVINWILLIAMS** |
|-----|--------------------|

 

**Marvin Williams**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

March 25, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11-627V

(E-Filed: April 14, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JOE B. WALLACE, * UNPUBLISHED

* 

 Petitioner, * Special Master

* Hamilton-Fieldman

v. * 

* Decision on Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * 

HUMAN SERVICES, * 

* 

Respondent. * .

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robert J. Krakow, Law Office of Robert J. Krakow, P.C., for Petitioner.

Lynn Ricciardella, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION1(ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2the 

undersigned issued a decision on January 16, 2014. On April 14, 2014, the parties filed a 

stipulation concerning attorney’s fees and costs in this matter. The parties’ stipulation 

requests an award of final attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $131,211.99, to be 

split jointly between Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, and an award of costs pursuant

to General Order # 9, in the amount of $3,153.36, payable solely to Petitioner. 

 

1

The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States 

Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 

Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 

3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within 

which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party (1) that is trade 

secret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that 

are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be available to 

the public. Id.

2

The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa-10 et seq. (2006). 
2

The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there 

existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is 

appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed 

amount seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby 

awards the total $131,211.99, as a lump sum in the form of a check payable jointly 

to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Robert J. Krakow, Esq. The undersigned 

additionally awards the total of $3,153.36, payable solely to Petitioner.

In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of 

the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment 

in accordance herewith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master
#### Florence Nunnally v. Mail and Express Company.

Motion granted.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 17-1965

Filed January 23, 2019

TROY PATRICK SHEARON,

Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge.

Troy Shearon appeals the summary disposition of his postconviction-relief 

application. AFFIRMED.

Angela Campbell of Dickey & Campbell Law Firm, PLC, Des Moines, for 

appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Zachary C. Miller, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and Mullins, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

Troy Shearon was convicted of first-degree murder and robbery. His 

conviction was affirmed on appeal. See generally State v. Shearon, 449 N.W.2d 

86 (Iowa Ct. App. 1989). He subsequently filed a postconviction-relief (PCR) 

application, which was unsuccessful in the district court and on appeal. In the 

instant PCR action, the district court granted summary disposition to the State.

Shearon appeals, raising three issues: (1) federal law requires retroactive 

application of State v. Heemstra, 721 N.W.2d 549 (Iowa 2006); (2) we should 

create a better framework for retroactivity under the Iowa Constitution to provide 

greater protections; and (3) trial and appellate counsel provided ineffective 

assistance.

Appellate review of summary disposition rulings in PCR proceedings is for 

legal error while claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are reviewed de novo. 

Castro v. State, 795 N.W.2d 789, 792 (Iowa 2011). In its ruling on the State’s 

motion for summary disposition, the district court considered each of the issues 

raised in this appeal, provided a thorough and meaningful analysis of each issue, 

found no genuine issues of material fact, and granted the State’s motion for 

summary disposition as a matter of law. See Iowa Code § 822.6 (2014). We agree 

with the conclusions and ruling of the district court.1 We affirm without further 

opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(c), (d), and (e).

AFFIRMED.

 

1 To the extent Shearon asks for re-examination of and changes to Iowa Supreme Court 

precedents, we are not at liberty to do so. See State v. Beck, 854 N.W.2d 56, 64 (Iowa 

Ct. App. 2014).
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00408-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.W. AND H.W.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 322nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (322-597027-16)

February 6, 2020

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell