alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**





**Bear
      Stearns Assets Backed Securities I Trust 2006-HE4**





**2006**











The
      undersigned, an authorized officer of LaSalle Bank National Association
      (“LBNA”), hereby certifies as follows:





1.  I
      have
      made, or caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the master
      servicing activities of LBNA during the preceding calendar year ending 2006,
      and
      its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April
      1,
      2006 (the “Agreement”) for Bear Stearns Asset-Backed Securities I Trust, Series
      2006-HE4.





2.  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, LBNA has, without exception,
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout the preceding calendar year ending 2006.





In
      witness whereof, I the undersigned have executed this Annual Statement of
      Compliance on this 7 th day of
      March, 2007.








LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Master Servicer







By:   /s/
      Andrew
      Leszczynski




Name:
      Andrew Leszczynski


Title:
      First Vice President
































Addressees:





Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC


383
      Madison Avenue


New
      York,
      New York 10179


Attn:
      Chief Counsel


regabnotifications@bear.com





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Securities Administrator


135
      South
      LaSalle Street, Suite 1625


Chicago,
      IL 60603


(312)
      904-2344


Attn:
      GSTS - BSABS 2006-HE4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Note: This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the Quarter  Ended June 30, 1999 and is  qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0001027574
<NAME>              OUTSOURCING SOLUTIONS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               32,095
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        45,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                            614
<INVENTORY>                                          30,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    116,671
<PP&E>                                               71,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                       31,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      599,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               111,352
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          13,159
<COMMON>                                                 53
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        599,221
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    257,076
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       237,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         76
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   25,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (6,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            375
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (6,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (6,546)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029317
<NAME> NATIONAL ACCOUNT SYSTEMS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                       996
<INVENTORY>                                     48,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,168
<PP&E>                                          89,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,829)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1  LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES  ICO North America, Inc.
  
  DelawareNew ICO Services
  Limited
  
  Great BritainICO Global Limited
  
  DelawareICO Management Corp.
  
  DelawareDouble Helix Investment
  Corp.
  
  DelawareICO Satellite Management,
  LLC
  
  DelawareICO Global
  Communications Canada Inc.
  
  CanadaICO Global
  Communications (Operations) Limited
  
  Cayman IslandsICO Satellite North
  America Limited
  
  Cayman IslandsICO Satellite Limited
  
  Great BritainICO-Pak Communications
  (Private) Ltd.
  
  PakistanICO-Global
  Telecomunikasyon Limited Sirketi
  
  TurkeyICO Satellite Services
  Limited
  
  Great BritainICO Services Limited
  
  Great BritainICO Global
  Communications Holdings (Netherlands Antilles) NV
  
  Netherland AntillesICO Global Communications
  Israel Ltd.
  
  IsraelICO Satellite Services
  GP
  
  DelawareICO Global
  Communications Holdings BV
  
  NetherlandsSSG UK Limited
  
  Great BritainNew ICO Satellite
  Services GP
  
  DelawareGatecom Leasing GmbH
  
  GermanyGatecom Mexico SA de CV
  
  MexicoICO Global
  Communications Services Inc.
  
  DelawareICO Communications
  Partners Ltd.
  
  CyprusGatecom Netherlands BV
  
  NetherlandsICO Global
  Communications (Holdings) PTE Ltd.
  
  SingaporeClosed Joint Stock
  Company ICO-R
  
  Russian FederationGatecom Brazil SA
  
  BrazilPT Aditama Fortanusa
  
  IndonesiaICO Telecommunicadcoes Ltda
  
  Brazil
EXHIBIT 99.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Melman, the Principal Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:         (1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         (2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects,              thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
						                                                        /s/ David A. Melman                                                        Principal Executive OfficerDated: August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 99.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Duncan, the Principal Financial Officerand Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:         (1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of               the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         (2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects,               thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
						                                                        						/s/ Patrick J. Duncan                                                        Principal Financial Officer and TreasurerDated: August 14, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell SHELBY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-31204.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wendell Shelby on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Shelby has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court Has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
L. Winger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/Dennis L. Winger
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Applera Corporation and will be retained by Applera Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50525

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ORLANDO GARCIA-ARREDONDO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-66-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Orlando Garcia-Arredondo appeals his sentence of 57 months of 

imprisonment, imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry 

into the United States after deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). 

According to Garcia-Arredondo, his sentence is substantively unreasonable, 

greater than necessary to satisfy the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and fails to 

account for his personal history and characteristics.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50525 Document: 00513880803 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2017
No. 16-50525

2

We review the substantive reasonableness of Garcia-Arredondo’s

sentence for abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007).

The district court, which was “in a superior position to find facts and judge 

their import under § 3553(a),” was presented with Garcia-Arredondo’s

mitigating arguments but concluded that a sentence within the guidelines 

range was reasonable. See United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 

338 (5th Cir. 2008). Garcia-Arredondo’s disagreement with the district court’s 

decision is insufficient to rebut the presumption of reasonableness accorded his 

within guidelines sentence. See United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th

Cir. 2009).

Garcia-Arredondo also argues that the illegal reentry guideline lacks an 

empirical basis and overstates the seriousness of illegal reentry offenses by 

using prior convictions to both calculate the base offense level and the criminal 

history category. We have previously rejected this “double counting” 

argument. See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-30 (5th Cir. 2009). 

As to the empirical data underlying the illegal reentry guideline, the district 

court could have reached, in its discretion and as part of its § 3553(a) analysis, 

a different decision as to the relevance of the amendment to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2

and the underlying policy decisions. United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 

564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir. 2009). That the district court did not do so, after 

considering the case before it, is also insufficient to rebut the presumption of 

reasonableness accorded a within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. 

Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 566 (5th Cir. 2008).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-50525 Document: 00513880803 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2017
Exhibit 3(a) 

PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION

Amendment to By-Laws Effective February 26, 2004

 

Section 3.1 of the By-laws was amended effective February 26, 2004, to reduce the number of directors comprising the Board of Directors from eleven to ten, pursuant to the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors as of December 18, 2003:

RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors of Peoples Energy Corporation (the "Company") be and hereby does amend the By-Laws of the Company to reduce the number of members constituting the Board of Directors from eleven to ten, such amendment to be effective as of the close of business February 26, 2004.
EX-35 (f)
PHH Mortgage
(logo) PHH
4001 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054


March 7, 2007

WELLS FARGO BANK
Servicer Oversight Group, Yvonne Williams
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Re:     Servicer Compliance Statement

Deal Name: GSAA 2006-7

Dear Sir and/or Madame:

This statement of compliance is being provided in accordance with Item 1123 of
Regulation AB. The Undersigned hereby states that:

1.      I am an authorized officer of PHH Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer");

2.      A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from 04/28/2006
        (the "Reporting Period") and its performance under the Agreement has
        been made under my supervision; and

3.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as described
        in section 3(a) hereto, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
        obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
        Reporting Period.

        a. The Servicer did not maintain or provide one of the required monthly
           reports, specifically the S5L2 Fidelity report, as stated in the
           transaction agreement(s) for the Reporting period shown in section 2
           of this statement.


By: /s/ Deborah A. Rocchi
Name: Deborah A. Rocchi
Title: Assistant Vice President
#### SCHNEIDER v. COHAN et al.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

May 28, 1954.

See, also, Fla., 59 So.2d 644.

Warren, Klein, Lehrman, Shorenstein & Kline, Miami, Beach, for appellants.

Myers, Heiman & Kaplan, Miami, for appellees.

DREW, Justice.

A motion has been made to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal which was filed April 15, 1954 was not filed within sixty days after the entry of the summary judgment appealed from.

The record before us shows that the summary judgment appealed from was dated February 11; 1954, was filed in the office of the Qerk of the Circuit Court of Dade County on the 11th day of February 1954, and its filing with the Clerk was noted in the Progress Docket on February 11, 1954. The record further shows, however, that such summary judgment was not recorded in the minutes of the Circuit Court until the 15th day of February 1954.

*70'An appeal from a final judgment at law must be taken “within sixty days from and after the entry of the * * * judgment * * * appealed from.” Sec. 59.08, F.S.1951, F.S.A. So far as appellate jurisdiction is concerned, the date of the signing of the judgment by the Circuit Judge or the date the same is filed in the Clerk’s office or the date the same is noted in the Progress Docket is of no consequence. The time begins to run from the effective day of the judgment and that is the day it is actually entered, that is to say, recorded, in the Circuit Court minute book. See Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke, 156 Fla. 638, 24 So.2d 310, 311. The same rule applies to appeals from final decrees in Chancery, the only difference being that Chancery decrees are required to be entered, that is, recorded, in the Chancery Order Book. See Magnant v. Peacock, 156 Fla. 688, 24 So.2d 314, 315, and the cases there cited; Barry v. Robson, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 739, 740. Compare, as to writs of certiorari in compensation cases, American Airmotive Corporation v. Stutz, Fla., 72 So.2d 665.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029301
   <NAME>  A M Miller & Associates Inc.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11420 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HARRY LYNN BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CR-24-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM: * Harry Lynn Bennett appeals his sentence for mail fraud and tax evasion, arguing that the district court erred in failing to group, for sentencing purposes, the mail fraud count with the tax evasion counts, since they are “closely related” counts under U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2(c). After Bennett filed his appeal, this court decided United States v. Haltom , No. 96-10707 (U.S. 5th Cir. MayNo. 96-11420 - 2 - 13, 1997), a connected case in which the same issue was raised, and on which the defendant prevailed.
In Haltom , this court concluded that the district court had erred in failing to group Haltom’s mail fraud and tax evasion offenses together as “closely related” counts pursuant to § 3D1.2(c), since “the mail fraud count ‘embodies conduct that is treated as a specific offense characteristic’ of the tax evasion counts.” Haltomat p. 8, quoting § 3D1.2(c). Similarly, Bennett’s mail-fraud count embodied conduct that was treated as a specific offense characteristic in the guideline applicable to the tax evasion counts. Therefore, the mail-fraud and tax evasion counts should have been grouped under § 3D1.2(c). The district court denied the Government’s § 5K1.1 motion because it did not believe Bennett was entitled to a departure for assisting the Government in prosecuting the people he “dragged” into his fraudulent scheme. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a § 5K1.1 downward departure in Bennett’s sentence. See United States v. Franks , 46 F.3d 402, 406 (5th Cir. 1995). The sentence is VACATED and the case REMANDED to the district court for resentencing. VACATED AND REMANDED.