alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7037
CHARLES WOODLAND-EL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland House of Correction Annex; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 3923-L) Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: January 26, 1998 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Woodland-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woodland-El v. Corcoran , No. CA-96-3923- L (D. Md. May 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 17.1



Richard E. Deloney, Jr.

14508 W. Windsor Ave.

Goodyear, Arizona 85395



March 17, 2009



Mr. C. B. Brechin

Brekford International

7020 Dorsey Road, Bldg. #C

Hanover, Maryland 21076





Dear C.B.,



Based upon a conversation I had with you last week, this letters serves as my resignation from the Board of Directors for Brekford International. The reason for my resignation is that per your evaluation, Brekford International is not in a financial position to pay for travel expenses for board members. There have also been recent discussions of reducing the already minimal monetary stipend paid to board members for performance of board duties. Given the lack of remuneration for serving on a public company board, and the time and distance factor associated with my active participation on the board, it is not feasible for me to continue as a member of the board.



This is an unfortunate situation as I believe my background and business skills can make a significant contribution to the growth of the company, especially in these challenging economic times. I wish Brekford International and the board much success in the coming year.





Sincerely,





[brekford171002.gif]

Richard E. Deloney, Jr.
Exhibit
23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements filed
by Neuralstem, Inc. on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-142451, 333-150574, 333-153387, and
333-157079) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-152801) of our report dated March 30, 2010
with respect to the audit of the balance sheets of Neuralstem, Inc. as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which appears in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neuralstem, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2009.





s/s
      Stegman & Company





Baltimore,
Maryland


March 30,
2010
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the amended annual report of Pet Express Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Renea Yamada, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Diane Egger, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Renea Yamada

Renea Yamada

Chief Executive Officer

August
6, 2007



/s/ Diane Egger

Diane Egger

Chief Financial Officer

August
6, 2007
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50681

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Tommy Delando Burns, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:06-CR-89-1

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Tommy Delando Burns, federal prisoner # 35499-177, was convicted 

of one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine 

and two counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of crack cocaine. 

Following a remand, he was resentenced to concurrent terms of 324 months 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 23, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50681 Document: 00515950851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2021
No. 20-50681

2

in prison and five years of supervised release, but his sentences were 

subsequently reduced, and he is now serving concurrent terms of 262 months 

in prison. He moved in the district court for resentencing under the First 

Step Act of 2018, § 404, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018), and 

he asked for a reduction of both his sentences and his terms of supervised 

release. Without a hearing, the district court denied the motion in an order 

without giving any reasons. 

Though district courts need not always explain why they have denied 

a motion, meaningful review is possible here only with a statement of reasons 

for the denial. See Peteet v. Dow Chem. Co., 868 F.2d 1428, 1436 (5th Cir. 

1989). Absent such a statement, we can only guess why the motion was 

denied. We thus REMAND for the limited purpose of allowing the district 

court to explain why it denied the motion, and we retain jurisdiction, as is 

customary for limited remands. See, e.g., United States v. Gomez, 905 F.3d 

347, 354-56 (5th Cir. 2018).

Case: 20-50681 Document: 00515950851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2021
219 So.2d 632

#### Sam L. REAMES v. J. B. HOLMAN, Guardian.

7 Div. 716.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 20, 1969.

Sam L. Reames, Birmingham, for pro se.

Guy Sparks, Anniston, for appellee.

COLEMAN, Justice.'

One Wallace Kelley was declared to be a person of unsound mind by the probate court. A guardian was appointed for Kelley. By order of the circuit court, administration of Kelley’s estate was removed to the circuit court, in equity.

Subsequently, appellant filed in the circuit court, in equity, a petition or motion asking that appellant be paid certain specified amounts for professional services rendered for Kelley by appellant as attorney at law. It appears that the services were rendered subsequent to the judgment which declared Kelley to be of unsound mind.

Appellant asked that the amount claimed be paid by Kelley’s guardian. The guardian resisted appellant’s motion.

After hearing ore tenus, the court denied appellant’s motion and dismissed it by decree rendered May 25, 1965.

Appellant filed an application for rehearing. The court rendered á decree *583denying the application for rehearing on July 26, 1965.

Appellant filed security for costs of appeal “from the judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama, on the 26th day of July, 1965.”

The decree of July 26, 1965, does not modify the prior final decree. Equity Rule 62 provides:

> “ . . . . No appeal will lie from such order unless it modifies the decree.

> “We have held that judicial notice must be taken of the absence of a judgment or decree supporting an appeal. (Citations omitted)” Dawson v. Campbell, 270 Ala. 586, 587, 120 So.2d 727.

> “A decree denying an application for rehearing in equity will not support an appeal; . . . .” Bronson v. Youngblood, 276 Ala. 14, 15, 158 So.2d 656, 657.

Numerous other cases are cited in Alabama Digest, Appeal & Error, &wkey; No. 110.

It is unmistakably clear that the instant appeal is taken from the decree of July 26, 1965, which is a decree overruling a motion for rehearing in equity and will not support an appeal.

> “We have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. It has been held consistently that no appeal will lie from a decree overruling a motion for a rehearing in equity. Ogle v. Ogle, 270 Ala. 201, 117 So.2d 191, and numerous authorities there cited.” Hale v. Kirby, 271 Ala. 289, 290, 122 So.2d 919, 920.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J, and SIMPSON and BLOODWORTH, JJ., concur.
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
($ in millions)

|                                                |                      |   |           |         |              |  |         |         | 
|----------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | - | --------- | ------- | ------------ |  | ------- | ------- | 
|                                                |                      |   | March 31, |         | December 31,
|                                                |                      |   | 2003      |         | 2002        
|                                                |                      |   |           |         |             
|Short-term debt                                 |                      | $ | 41.2      |         |              |  | 35.2    |        
|Current portion of long-term debt               |                      |   | 128.6     |         |              |  | 127.0   |        
|Long-term debt                                  |                      |   | 1,935.4   |         |              |  | 1,948.4 |        
|                                                |                      |   |           |         |              |  |         |        
|                                                | Total debt           |   |           | 2,105.2 |              |  |         | 2,110.6 | 
|                                               
|Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries |                      |   | 66.9      |         |              |  | 65.3    |        
|Shareholders equity                            |                      |   | 2,800.2   |         |              |  | 2,813.6 |        
|                                                |                      |   |           |         |              |  |         |        
|                                                | Total capitalization |   | $         | 4,972.3 |              |  |         | 4,989.5 | 
|                                                |                      |   |           |         |              |  |         |        
|Ratio of total debt to total capitalization     |                      |   | 42.3      | %       |              |  | 42.3    | %      
|                                                |                      |   |           |         |              |  |         |
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

| Dated: | March                30, 2007 |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ F. Jacob                Cherian                       |   |
|   |   | F. Jacob                Cherian                                |   |
|   |   | President                and                Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   | (Principal                Executive Officer)                   |   |

|   |   |                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                         |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Suhel                  Kanuga                                                                       |   |
|   |   | Suhel                    Kanuga                                                                              |   |
|   |   | Executive                  Vice                  President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |   |
|   |   | (Principal                    Financial Officer)                                                        |   |
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mount Vernon Trust Company, Respondent, v. Charles D. Millard, as Supervisor of the Town of Greenburgh, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Present — Hirschherg, P. J., Jenks,, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. GREG AY O D AFI NO NE, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50374 D. C . No . 2 : 1 0 - c r - 0 0 3 7 2 - J HN ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a c que l i ne H . N guy e n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J une 18, 2013 ** B e f o r e : T A L L M A N , M . S M I T H , a n dH U R W I T Z , C ir c u it J u d g e s . G r e g A y o D a f

i none appe a l s f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c ha l l e nge s the 77- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f or ba nk f r aud, i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . § 1344. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED JU N 24 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50374 2 T h e g o v e rn m e n t c o n te n d s th a t th e ap p e a l is b a rr e db ya n ap p e a l w a iv e r . W e d e c lin e to d is m is s o n th e b a s is o f th e ap p e a l w a iv e r . Se e U ni te d State s v . J

ac obo Ca s tillo , 49 6 F . 3d 94 7, 95 7 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( en banc). D af i no ne cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d i n i m po si ng a 14-l evel sen t en ci n g en h an cem en tu n d er U . S . S . G . § 2 B 1 . 1 (b )(1 )(H ) b ecau se i t s l o ss c a l c ul a t i on w a s nots upport e d bythe e vi de nc e . T he pa rt i e s di s put e w he the rthe g o v ern m en tw as req u i red t o p ro v e th e fact s su p p o rt i n g th e en h an cem en tb y a p r e p o n d e r a n c e o f

th e e v id e n c e o rb yac le a ra n dc o n v in c in g e v id e n c e s ta n d a r d . W e need no tre sol ve thi s i ss ue, because there w as no fa ctual di sput e a s t o the ac tual lo s s e s s u f

f e r e db yth e v ic tim b a n k s . M o r e o v e r , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t e rrin f in d in g th a t D a f

in o n e w a s p a rt o f

ac o m m o n f

r au d u le n t s c h e m e , a n da ttr ib u tin g a ll lo s s e s o c c a s io n e db yth e s c h e m e to h im . See U .S .S .G . § 1 B 1 .3 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ) ( s p e c if ic o f f e n s e c h a r a c te r is tic d e te rm in e do n b a s is o f a ll r e a s o n ab lyf

o r e s e e ab le a c ts un dert aken by part i ci pant s i n a j oi ntcr i m i nal ac t i vi ty i n furtherance of that a c tiv ity ) ; U

ni ted States v. Sh ow al ter , 56 9 F . 3d 11 50 , 11 59 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( di stri ct court ’ s f ac tual fi nd i ng s s up po rt i ng a s ent ence enhancem entar e r evi ew ed for c l ear e rr o r ) . AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>                     This schedule contains summary financial
                             information extracted from Hondo Oil & Gas
                             Company's Form 10-Q for the period identified
                             below.  This information is qualified in its
                             entirety by reference to such financial
                             statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<CASH>                                  717
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,435
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,279
<PP&E>                               40,728
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       46,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               144,957
<BONDS>                              10,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             13,798
<OTHER-SE>                         (122,012)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         46,856
<SALES>                               1,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,872
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (15,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (15,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (15,113)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (1.10)
        




















</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1


                   [Letterhead of Congress Financial Corporation]





                                             March 8, 2000


Mr. Timothy Mertz
Vice President - Treasury
Payless Cashways
777 NW Blue Parkway
Suite 5900
Lee's Summit, MO  64086

Dear Tim:

     Please use this letter as notification that Congress has approved a
temporary and discretionary increase in the inventory advance rate by 5%
to 70%.  This increase is available to the company through May 31, 2000,
and is subject to all terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement.  On
June 1, 2000, the inventory advance rate reduces to 65%.

     All other terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement remain in full
force and effect.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me.

                                             Sincerely,



                                             Steve Linderman
                                             First Vice President



cc: G. Kalesnik
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>

                                                                      Exhibit 27

        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
        SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000110101
<NAME>  NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     202,894
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        22
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         43,248
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        3,897
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 20,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                270,962
<COMMON>                                       24,757
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            77,584
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                102,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           69,734
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 98,887
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                 270,962
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     108,485
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     87,793
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     87,793
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        20,692
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 89
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 20,781
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,608
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            7,075
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,098
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  11,098
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        7,795
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       2,269
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         16,221
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>