[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50983-50985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-070-1610-011J]


Notice of Availability of the Price Field Office Proposed 
Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(PRMP/FEIS)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Proposed Resource Management 
Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement (PRMP/FEIS) for the Price 
Field Office.

DATES: The BLM planning regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-2) state that any 
person who meets the conditions as described in the regulations may 
protest the BLM's PRMP/FEIS. A person who meets the conditions and 
files a protest must file the protest within 30 days of the date that 
the Environmental Protection Agency publishes this notice in the 
Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Price Field Office PRMP/FEIS were sent to 
affected Federal, state, and local government agencies and to 
interested parties. Copies of the PRMP/FEIS are available

[[Page 50984]]

for public inspection at: Price Field Office, 125 South 600 West, 
Price, UT 84501. Utah State Office, 440 West 200 South, Salt Lake City, 
UT 84145.
    Interested persons may also review the PRMP/FEIS on the Internet at 
http://www.blm.gov/ut/st/en/fo/price/planning.html. All protests must 
be in writing and mailed to the following addresses:

Regular Mail: BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Hudgens-Williams, 
P.O. Box 66538, Washington, DC 20035.
Overnight Mail: BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Hudgens-Williams, 
1620 L Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Floyd Johnson, Price Field Office, 
125 South 600 West, Price, UT 84501; phone: (435)636-3600; or e-mail 
at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#084e6467716c57426760667b6766486a6465266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d197bdbea8b58e9bbeb9bfa2bebf91b3bdbcffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Price RMP planning area is located in 
central Utah. The BLM administers approximately 2.5 million acres of 
surface estate and 2.8 million acres of Federal mineral estate within 
the planning area.
    The Price RMP will provide future broad-scale management direction 
for land use allocations and allowable uses on public lands within the 
planning area. Implementation of the decisions of the PRMP/FEIS would 
apply only to BLM-administered public lands and Federal mineral estate. 
In the Draft RMP/EIS (DRMP/DEIS), which was released for public review 
and comment in July 2004, five alternatives were analyzed, including a 
No Action alternative. These alternatives were developed through issue 
identification during the scoping process. Public involvement and 
collaboration began with scoping to identify issues, concerns, and 
opportunities to be resolved in the planning process. Input on planning 
issues was gathered from the public during a comment period and 
associated open houses. The major issues addressed in the PRMP/DEIS 
include: oil and gas leasing and development; management of recreation 
opportunities in Special Recreation Management Areas (SRMAs), 
designation of routes for off-highway vehicle (OHV) travel, livestock 
grazing, management of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs), 
and recommendations for Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR) designations. In 
September 2007 a Supplemental DEIS was released for public review and 
comment which considered an additional alternative emphasizing the 
protection of non-WSA lands with wilderness characteristics. The PRMP/
FEIS would designate five new ACECs, and the continuation of eight 
existing ACECs, totaling 206,965 acres. Resource use limitations that 
apply to the proposed ACECs include a range of prescriptions as 
described in Table 1 below.

                         Table 1--Evaluation of Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Area name                      Values of concern          Resource use limitations       Acres
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big Flat Tops...........................  Relict vegetation.........  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10..        192
Bowknot Bend............................  Relict vegetation.........  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10..      1,087
Dry Lake Archaeological District........  Cultural..................  11, 12, 13, 14.................     18,010
Interstate 70...........................  Scenic....................  2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14.........     33,068
Muddy Creek.............................  Cultural, Historic, Scenic  2, 5, 7, 9, 12 (1 in WSA), 13,      25,119
                                                                       14, 15.
Pictographs/Rock Art....................  Cultural..................  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (partial), 7,       5,303
                                                                       8, 14.
San Rafael Canyon.......................  Scenic....................  5, 6 (partial), 7, 8, 9, 13,        17,595
                                                                       14, 16.
San Rafael Reef.........................  Scenic, Vegetation........  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 14.....     73,170
Seger's Hole............................  Scenic....................  2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14.........      7,067
Nine Mile Canyon........................  Cultural..................  14, 17, 18.....................     26,211
Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry.........  Paleontologic.............  2, 3, 19, 20, 21, 22, 1                766
                                                                       (partial), 12 (partial).
Heritage Sites..........................  Historic..................  2, 3 (partial), 4, 7, 8, 12,         1,095
                                                                       15, 23.
Uranium Mining Districts................  Historic..................  6, 12, 15, 24..................      2,201
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Closed to oil and gas leasing.
    2. Closed to mineral materials disposal.
    3. Proposed for withdrawal from locatable mineral entry.
    4. Excluded from ROW grants.
    5. Excluded from private or commercial use of woodland products.
    6. Excluded from livestock use.
    7. Excluded from land treatments.
    8. Excluded from range improvements.
    9. VRM Class I.
    10. Closed to OHV use.
    11. Block cultural surveys required.
    12. Oil and gas leasing subject to No Surface Occupancy.
    13. Avoidance area for ROW grants.
    14. OHV use limited to designated routes.
    15. Firewood collection not allowed.
    16. Oil and gas subject to minor constraints.
    17. Oil and gas leasing subject to No Surface Occupancy on federal 
surface, Controlled Surface Use on split estate.
    18. VRM Class II and III.
    19. Closed to public access without authorization (use fee).
    20. Camping not allowed.
    21. Fossil and mineral collection not allowed.
    22. Hiking on developed trails only.
    23. VRM Class II.
    24. No historic structures to be disturbed.
    Comments on the Price Field Office DRMP/DEIS received from the 
public and internal BLM review were considered and incorporated as 
appropriate into the PRMP/FEIS. Public comments resulted in the 
addition of clarifying text, but did not significantly change proposed 
land use plan decisions.
    Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM 
regarding the PRMP/FEIS may be found in the Dear Reader Letter of the 
PRMP/FEIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. E-mail and faxed protests will not be 
accepted as valid protests unless the protesting party also provides 
the original letter by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by 
the close of the protest period.
    Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the e-mail or faxed 
protest as an advance copy and it will receive full consideration. If 
you wish to provide the BLM with such advance notification, please 
direct faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator 
at 202-452-5112, and e-mails to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c785b5a2a9a3a6988fb2a3a0a2a9b4ea90aeababaea6aab487a5abaae9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="135161767d77724c5b667774767d603e447a7f7f7a727e6053717f7e3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.
    All protests, including the follow-up letter (if e-mailing or 
faxing) must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate

[[Page 50985]]

address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES section above.
    Before including your phone number, e-mail address, or other 
personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware 
that your entire protest--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your protest to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5-1.

    Dated: June 5, 2008.
Selma Sierra,
Utah State Director.
[FR Doc. E8-19950 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>