alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(a)



PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the combined Quarterly Report of Peoples Energy Corporation (the "Company"), The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company ("Peoples Gas") and North Shore Gas Company ("North Shore Gas") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Patrick, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas.



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | May 13, 2003
|--------------------- |  |  | ------------
|                      |  |  | Date        

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board, 
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Energy Corporation



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | May 13, 2003
|--------------------- |  |  | ------------
|                      |  |  | Date        

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | May 13, 2003
|--------------------- |  |  | ------------
|                      |  |  | Date        

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
North Shore Gas Company
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6495 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration 

from accepting warrants for the arrest of aliens as valid proof of identification at aviation security checkpoints, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2022 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS (for herself, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

NEWHOUSE, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. JACOBS of New York, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. GOHMERT, Mrs. MILLER of 

Illinois, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. GAETZ, and Mr. GUEST) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Transportation Security 

Administration from accepting warrants for the arrest 

of aliens as valid proof of identification at aviation security checkpoints, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crime Doesn’t Fly Act 

5 of 2022’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6495 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF USE OF ICE ARREST WARRANTS 

2 AS IDENTIFICATION AT AVIATION SECURITY 

3 CHECKPOINTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

5 (b), the Administrator of the Transportation Security Ad6 ministration may not accept a prohibited document as 

7 valid proof of identification at an aviation security check8 point. 

9 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with 

10 respect to an alien who is being removed from the United 

11 States in accordance with the immigration laws (as such 

12 term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Na13 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)). 

14 (c) PROHIBITED DOCUMENT DEFINED.—In this sec15 tion, the term ‘‘prohibited document’’ means any of the 

16 following: 

17 (1) Immigration and Customs Enforcement 

18 Form I–200, Warrant for Arrest of Alien (or any 

19 successor form). 

20 (2) Immigration and Customs Enforcement 

21 Form I–205, Warrant of Removal/Deportation (or 

22 any successor form). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Henry G. Schopfer, III, Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”), certify,that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Henry G. Schopfer, III     Henry G. Schopfer, III    Chief Financial Officer    Date: May 9, 2008  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.*
EX-35 (b)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


October 25, 2007

Financial Asset Securities Corporation


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-2

Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 04/01/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year:

(a)     A review of such party's activities during the reporting period and of
        such party's performance under this Agreement, or such other applicable
        agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, has been made
        under such officer's supervision.

(b)     To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
        Participant, in all  material respects throughout such reporting period,
        or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any
        material respect, specifying each such failure known to such  officer
        and the nature and status thereof.

(c)     Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
        extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements,
        certifications or assertions herein are subject to the following):
        instances of noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the
        applicable reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.


Certified By:
/s/ Elisabeth A. Brewster
Elisabeth A. Brewster, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


(page)


Schedule A


Reporting Errors

During the reporting period, one or more of the monthly investor reports
contained certain types of errors in regard to the calculation and or the
reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets. To the best of the signing
officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been material,
has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has been
disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the reporting
period.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6299 

To prohibit the disbursement of Federal funds to State and local governments 

that allow individuals who are not citizens of the United States to 

vote in any Federal, State, or local election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. 

BUDD, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. CLINE, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. 

FEENSTRA, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GARBARINO, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 

TONY GONZALES of Texas, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, 

Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. JACOBS of New York, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, 

Mr. LAMBORN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. POSEY, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. STEFANIK, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

TIMMONS, Mr. VAN DREW, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WEBER of Texas, and 

Mr. ZELDIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the disbursement of Federal funds to State and 

local governments that allow individuals who are not 

citizens of the United States to vote in any Federal, 

State, or local election. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6299 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our Democ3 racy by Preventing Foreign Citizens from Voting Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PAYMENT RESTRICTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, no Federal funds may be made available to 

7 any State or local government if such State or local gov8 ernment allows individuals who are not citizens of the 

9 United States to vote in any Federal, State, or local elec10 tion. 

11 (b) CERTIFICATION.—Upon application, approval, 

12 and receipt of any Federal funds, a State or local govern13 ment shall certify that the State or local government does 

14 not permit individuals who are not citizens of the United 

15 States to vote in any Federal, State, or local election. 

16 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The requirements of this sec17 tion shall only apply with respect to any contract entered 

18 into or grant made on or after the date of the enactment 

19 of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6308 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6308

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way 
beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 
also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by nurse 
  practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2021

Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Gallagher, and Miss 
Rice of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way 
beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 
also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by nurse 
  practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ACO Assignment Improvement Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFICIARIES UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM.

    Section 1899(c)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395jjj(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) in the case of performance years beginning on 
                or after January 1, 2022, primary care services 
                provided under this title by an ACO professional 
                described in subsection (h)(1)(B).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Mario RUBIO-GUIDO, aka Mario Guido Rubio aka Ismael Corodoba aka Ismael Tapia, Defendant — Appellant.

No. 01-10741.

D.C. No. CR-00-05363-AWI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 11, 2002.

Decided Oct. 21, 2002.

*343Before TASHIMA, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Mario Rubio-Guido appeals from his conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.

The district court did not err when it issued a general unanimity instruction rather than a specific unanimity instruction concerning the dates of deportation and reentry. Because the evidence presented in the case was relatively simple and there was no indication of a likelihood of juror confusion, jury unanimity can be presumed based on a general instruction. *See United States v. Ferris,*719 F.2d 1405, 1407 (9th Cir.1983); *United States v. Friedman,*445 F.2d 1076, 1084-85 (9th Cir.1971).

The district court also did not err in declining to admit the indictment into evidence. A jury need not be privy to the exact wording in an indictment, provided that the charge against the defendant has been adequately explained to the jury. *See United States v. Wilson,*535 F.2d 521, 523 (9th Cir.1976); *Martin v. United States,*335 F.2d 945, 950 (9th Cir.1964). Here, the nature of the charges against Rubio-Guido had been explained to the jury several times. For the same reason, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to amend the jury instructions to include the specific dates alleged in the indictment.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lee E. Mikles, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pendrell Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ LEE E. MIKLES                                                  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Lee E. Mikles                                                      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00325-CR

CONRAD VONBOSE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. F-2012-0916-D

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal, Pursuant to 

T.R.A.P. 42.2(a),” which is unopposed. The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of 

the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion 

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 7, 2016
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6593 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

provide for a pilot program under the Comprehensive Opioid Abuse 

Grant Program for local law enforcement agencies located in rural areas 

to purchase naloxone to prevent and reduce opioid overdose deaths, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2022 

Mr. NEWHOUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to provide for a pilot program under the 

Comprehensive Opioid Abuse Grant Program for local 

law enforcement agencies located in rural areas to purchase naloxone to prevent and reduce opioid overdose 

deaths, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Offi5 cers Preventing Drug Abuse Related Deaths Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6593 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF RURAL NALAXONE PILOT PRO2 GRAMS FOR FUNDING UNDER THE COM3 PREHENSIVE OPIOID ABUSE GRANT PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 3021 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

6 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10701) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(11) A pilot program for local law enforcement 

11 agencies located in rural areas to purchase purchase 

12 opioid receptor antagonists, including naloxone, for 

13 use by officers in the line of duty, as described in 

14 subsection (f).’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(f) RURAL NALAXONE PILOT PROGRAM.—The pilot 

17 program described under this subsection shall make 

18 grants to rural areas to implement a program for local 

19 law enforcement agencies to purchase opioid receptor an20 tagonists, including naloxone, for use by officers in the 

21 line of duty.’’. 

22 SEC. 3. PROVISION REGARDING CERTAIN FUNDING LEVEL 

23 FOR RURAL COMMUNITIES. 

24 Section 3024 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

25 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10704) is amend26 ed— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6593 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(C) by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(3) provides that no less than 50 percent of 

7 grants issued pursuant to this part shall be awarded 

8 to rural areas.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

10 Section 3025 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

11 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10705) is amend12 ed by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(9) The term ‘rural area’ have the meanings 

14 given such terms in section 343(a)(13)(A) of the 

15 Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 

16 U.S.C. 1991(a)(13)(A)).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[ X]    **QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
           EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the quarterly period ended 
        JUNE 30, 2001**OR

[ ]    **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
          EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the transition period from 
 
to
 
 

Commission file number 
           0-368
 

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

              Minnesota
41-0462685
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
215 South Cascade Street, Box 496, Fergus Falls, Minnesota    
56538-0496
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

218-739-8200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      YES  X      NO     
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date:
**July 31, 2001 - 24,324,437 Common Shares ($5 par value)

OTTER TAIL CORPORATION

INDEX

 **
**Part I.             Financial Information**** **Page No.** ** ** ** ** **Item 1.  Financial Statements** ** ** ** ** ** **Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2001********************************
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





________________








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT,


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934








DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  May 3, 2012








CHYRON CORPORATION


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








New York
01-09014
11-2117385(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)








5 Hub DriveMelville, New York
11747(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)








Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000











Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





























Item 2.02                      Results of Operations and Financial Condition





On May 3, 2012, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the first quarter ended March 31, 2012. A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1





Item 9.01                      Financial Statements and Exhibits





(c)           Exhibits.





99.1           Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated May 3, 2012.











SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CHYRON CORPORATION





By:
/s/ Jerry KieliszakName:
Jerry KieliszakTitle:
Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Exhibit No.
Description99.1
Press Release, dated May 3, 2012.











Date:  May 3, 2012