alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 13, 2003

  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6839

VICTOR COLLYN GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BISHOP ROBINSON, Secretary of Public Safety

and Corrections; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden;

RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner; PATRICK CONROY,

Facility Administrator; WILLIAM H. BRITTON;

VERONICA MOORE, CMSII; LIEUTENANT EYLER; RON

WILLIAMS, CMSII; KASSIDY SAVAGE; LIEUTENANT

REDD; OFFICER ELLIOT, COII; MARSHA MALOFF,

Facility Administrator; MS. BOOSE, CMSS;

MS. SMITH, CMSII; MS. SPRIGGS, CMSI; WILSON,

CMSI; SERGEANT RINGLY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-95-1513-JFM)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Greene

v. Robinson, No. CA-95-1513-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 12, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF J. C.
PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF OCTOBER 26, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1996
<CASH>                                             180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                      5,748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,033
<PP&E>                                           6,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,184
<BONDS>                                          4,663
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        574
<COMMON>                                         1,446
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,370
<SALES>                                         14,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,233
<CGS>                                           10,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   189
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    754
<INCOME-TAX>                                       283
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.89
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of SGS International, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                  
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|March 19, 2008 |  | /s/ HENRY R. BAUGHMAN                            
|               |  | Henry R. Baughman                                
|               |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  
|               | 
|               |  | /s/ JAMES M. DAHMUS                              
|               |  | James M. Dahmus                                  
|               |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Brian Francis HIGGINS, Sr., Appellant, v. George O. CAMPBELL, sometimes known as Gerry Ora Campbell, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

March 7, 1956.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1956.

Miller, Miller & Hewitt, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Earnest, Lewis, Smith & Jones, West Palm Beach, and Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Fields & Ward, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of the companion case of Brailsford v. Campbell, Fla., 89 So.2d 241. No other reversible error has been discovered in the point peculiar to this case.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and HOBSON, ROBERTS and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ.,

dissent for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in the companion case of Brails-ford v. Campbell.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6454 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6454

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the primary functions and duties of the Office of Advocacy 
     of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Advocacy Improvements 
Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF 
              ADVOCACY OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Primary Functions.--Section 202 of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 
634b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``and the international 
        economy'' after ``economy'';
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ``complete'' and 
        inserting ``compete''; and
            (3) in paragraph (12), by striking ``serviced-disabled'' 
        and inserting ``service-disabled''.
    (b) Duties.--Section 203(a) of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 634c) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) represent the views and interests of small businesses 
        before foreign governments and international entities for the 
        purpose of contributing to regulatory and trade initiatives 
        which may affect small businesses.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6454

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the primary functions and duties of the Office of Advocacy 
     of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes.
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6499 

To enhance rail safety and provide for the safe and covered transport of 

materials in railroad cars, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2022 

Ms. MENG (for herself and Mr. SUOZZI) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To enhance rail safety and provide for the safe and covered 

transport of materials in railroad cars, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Train Coverings for 

5 Community Safety Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING REQUIRED. 

7 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe 

9 regulations requiring materials transported by rail to be 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6499 IH

1 completely covered while in transit, including while being 

2 held, delayed, or transferred. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00443-CV

IN RE Freddie Lee WALKER

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 30, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 10, 2020, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. After 

considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 19-2808-CV-A, styled Freddie Lee Walker v. Darrell Hunter, Justice of the 

Peace, Precinct 1, et al., pending in the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable William 

D. Old, III presiding.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
      Baily, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Scott BailyScott
                Baily
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              August
                28, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6566 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6566

 To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for the diagnosis, 
    maintenance, and repair of certain digital electronic equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2022

Mr. Jones (for himself and Mrs. Spartz) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for the diagnosis, 
    maintenance, and repair of certain digital electronic equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom to Repair Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. DIAGNOSIS, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR OF CERTAIN DIGITAL 
              ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT.

    Section 1201 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(l) Diagnosis, Maintenance, and Repair of Digital Electronic 
Equipment.--(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(1)(A), 
it is not a violation of that subsection for a person, for the purpose 
of the diagnosis, maintenance, or repair of digital electronic 
equipment, to circumvent a technological measure that effectively 
controls access to a work protected under this title.
    ``(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(2), it is 
not a violation of that subsection for a person, for the purpose of the 
diagnosis, maintenance, or repair of digital electronic equipment, to 
manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic 
in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof 
described in that subsection.
    ``(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b)(1), it is 
not a violation of that subsection for a person, for the purpose of the 
diagnosis, maintenance, or repair of digital electronic equipment, to 
manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic 
in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof 
described in that subsection.
    ``(4) Nothing in this subsection applies to manufacturers or 
distributors of a medical device as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. Sec. 321(h)) or a digital electronic 
product or embedded software manufactured for use in a medical setting 
including diagnostic, monitoring, or control equipment or any product 
or service that they offer.
    ``(5) For the purposes of this subsection, the term `digital 
electronic equipment' means any product dependent, in whole or in part, 
upon attached or embedded digital electronics to function.''.
                                 <all>
```
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                 --------------


                                    FORM 8-KA

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                       Date of Report: January 25, 2000
                        (Date of earliest event reported)


                       CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                             (Packager and Servicer)
    (Issuer    in Respect of the REMIC Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2000-1)
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 Delaware                     333-72459                     13-3408713
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other juris-       (Commission                 (I.R.S. Employer
diction of organization)      File Nos.)                 Identification No.)


12855 North Outer Forty Drive, St. Louis, Missouri            63141
--------------------------------------------------            -----
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)


Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code (314) 851-6305

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)


<PAGE>

Item 5.        Other Events.

      Attached as Exhibit 8.1 is the opinion of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
with respect to certain tax matters relating to the Issuer's REMIC Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2000-1, including their consent.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                            CITICORP MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                                            (Registrant)

                                           By: /s/ Michael J. Tarpley
                                               -------------------------
                                                    Michael J. Tarpley
                                                    Assistant Vice President and
                                                    Assistant Secretary


Dated: January 25, 2000
H. R. 6614 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4744 Grand 

River Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Louise McCauley Parks Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ROSA LOUISE MCCAULEY PARKS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4744 Grand River Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rosa Louise McCauley 

Parks Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Rosa Louise McCauley Parks Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 33.2**

REPORT ON ASSESSSMENT OF

COMPLIANCEWITH SEC REGULATION AB CRITERIA

First DataResources, Inc. through its affiliate REMITCO, LLC (jointly, the “AssertingParty”) is responsible for assessing compliance for the servicing oftransactions on the remittance payment platform relating to the opening,listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxesserviced by the Asserting Party as of and for the 12 month period endingDecember 31, 2006, (the “ReportingPeriod) with the servicing criteria set forth in the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB Section229.1122(d), except for the criteria set forth in Sections229.1122(d)(l)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv),1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii) and (v)-(xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded arenot applicable to the servicing of the transactions as set forth in agreementsbetween Capital One Services, Inc., together with its affiliates, Capital OneBank and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and the Asserting Party in so far as itrelates to the opening, listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed topost office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party (the “Applicable ServicingCriteria”) for the Reporting Period.

The AssertingParty has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria by theAsserting Party for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the AssertingParty has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria for the servicing of transactions relating to the opening, listing anddepositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by theAsserting Party as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independentregistered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on theassessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Periodas set forth in this assertion.
| First Data Resources, Inc. |   | REMITCO LLC      |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                       |   |             |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   |             |   |   |   |   |
| By:                        |   | /s/ David Bailis |   | By: |   | /s/ Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | David Bailis     |   |   |   | Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | President        |   |   |   | President |

 

February26, 2007

----