alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Financial Management Service; Senior Executive Service; Financial 
Management Service Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Financial Management Service (FMS) Performance Review Board (PRB).

DATES: This notice is effective on August 26, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Lebryk, Deputy Commissioner, 
Financial Management Service, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC; 
telephone (202) 874-7000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice 
is given of the appointment of individuals to serve as members of the 
FMS PRB. This Board reviews the performance appraisals of career senior 
executives below the Assistant Commissioner level and makes 
recommendations regarding ratings, bonuses, and other personnel 
actions. Four voting members constitute a quorum. The names and titles 
of the FMS PRB members are as follows:

Primary Members

David A. Lebryk, Deputy Commissioner
Rita Bratcher, Assistant Commissioner, Debt Management Services
Sheryl R. Morrow, Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance
Wanda Rogers, Assistant Commissioner, Payment Management
Charles R. Simpson, Assistant Commissioner, Information Resources
D. James Sturgill, Assistant Commissioner, Govermentwide Accounting

Alternate Member

Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner, Management (Chief Financial 
Officer)

David A. Lebryk,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E8-19767 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### KIS, S.A., PMI Photomagic, Ltd., and Image Dynamics, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FOTO FANTASY, INC. (doing business as Fantasy Entertainment, Inc.) and American Photo Booths, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1411.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 4, 2003.

Before CLEVENGER, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PROST, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, KIS, S.A., PMI Photo-magic, Ltd., and Image Dynamics, LLC (collectively “Photomagic”) challenge the district court’s overruling of Photomagic’s objections on issues relating to the bill of costs. In light of the decision in *KIS S.A. et al. v. Foto Fantasy et al,*02-1263, - *3461264 (Fed.Cir.2003) we find this current companion case moot.

Accordingly, the court having considered the submissions of the parties,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The renewed motion for sanctions is denied.

(2) Because this case is rendered moot by reason of the decision and judgment of this court in the companion case, we dismiss the appeal and vacate the district court’s order of April 30, 2002.
Exhibit 31(ii)


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


            1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Home Equity
                  Loan Trust, Series 2006-S2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                  reports");

            2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                  and other information required to be provided under Form
                  10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                  the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                  review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                  statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                  Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                  periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                  obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                  respects; and

            5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

      Date: March 26, 2007


            /s/ Steve Bailey
            Steve Bailey
            Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-1135

SONIA I. JIMÉNEZ; LOURDES MOLINA-DOVAL,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

LUIS ALFONSO RODRÍGUEZ-PAGÁN; ALIDA RAMONA BINET-MIESES;

CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP RODRÍGUEZ-BINET; FEDERICO TOMÁS

RODRÍGUEZ-BINET a/k/a Tommy Rodríguez; ISABELA BEACH COURT,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 1, 2010 is amended

as follows:

On page 11, line 5, delete repeated word "person"

On page 11, line 10, replace "will" with "would"

On page 11, line 13, replace "non-joinder" with "nonjoinder"

On page 12, line 15, insert "79" before "F. Supp. 2d"
**Exhibit 31**

** **

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Asset-Backed Certificates, WMABS Series 2006-HE2 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  LaSalle BankNational Association.

Date:  March 15, 2007

 

  /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann_________Name:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President

** **
#### Delia Griffin and James Francis Griffin, Respondents, v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ko opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
<PAGE>
                    PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
(Unaudited; dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       June 30,       December 31,
                                                         2002             2001
                                                       --------         --------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>
Short-term debt ...............................        $   51.6             59.3
Current portion of long-term debt .............           135.7            269.7
Long-term debt ................................         2,467.5          2,522.0
                                                       --------         --------
     Total debt ...............................         2,654.8          2,851.0

Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries            62.4             59.4
Shareholders' equity ..........................         3,220.8          2,707.2
                                                       --------         --------
     Total capitalization .....................        $5,938.0          5,617.6
                                                       ========         ========

Ratio of total debt to total capitalization ...            44.7%            50.8%
                                                       ========         ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 5.1



Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP

599 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022

212-536-3900



October 17, 2007

Chyron Corporation

5 Hub Drive
Melville, NY 11747

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as your counsel in connection with the Post Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-01861) (the "Registration Statement") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") for the registration of 666,666 shares (the "Shares") of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation.

You have requested our opinion as to the matters set forth below in connection with the Registration Statement. For purposes of rendering that opinion, we have examined the Registration Statement, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and Bylaws, and the corporate action of the Company that provides for the issuance of the Shares, and we have made such other investigation as we have deemed appropriate.  We have examined and relied upon certificates of public officials and, as to certain matters of fact that are material to our opinion, we have also relied on a certificate of an officer of the Company. In rendering our opinion, we also have made the assumptions that are customary in opinion letters of this kind.  We have not verified any of those assumptions.

Our opinion set forth below is limited to the law of the State of New York.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that the Shares are duly authorized for issuance by the Company and, when issued and paid for as described in the Prospectus included in the Registration Statement, will be validly issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. In giving our consent we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the 1933 Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

Yours truly,

/s/ Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP

Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Fearless  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jeffrey Binder, President and Chief Executive Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2007

      By:  /s/ JEFFREY BINDER
           ------------------

      Name:  Jeffrey Binder
      Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
NO. 07-01-0512-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D FEBRUARY

19, 2002

______________________________ IN THE ESTATE OF JO SE SOTELLA FLORES, DECEASED

_________________________________ FROM THE CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF LUB BOCK COUNT Y; NO. 95-779,794; HON. LARRY B. LADD, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. Elodia Flores (appellant) attempts to pe rfect an appeal to this Court. By letter from this Court dated January 2, 2002, we i nformed her that the fil ing fee of $125.00 req uired to perfect this appea l was outstanding a nd that the failure to pay same coul d result in the dismissal of her case. To date, appellant has not paid the $125.00 filing fee as directed. Nor has she provided us with evidence illu stratin g that she is entitled to proceed as a pauper. Due to appellant’s

failure to pay

the filing fee, w

e dismiss the appea l purs uant to Texas Rule of Appe llate Procedur e 42.3 (c). Per Cu riam Do not publish

.
Exhibit 32(b)





PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the combined Quarterly Report of Peoples Energy Corporation (the "Company"), The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company ("Peoples Gas") and North Shore Gas Company ("North Shore Gas") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Nardi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas.



|/s/ THOMAS A. NARDI |  |  | February 7, 2006
|------------------- |  |  | ----------------
|                    |  |  | Date            

Thomas A. Nardi
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of
Peoples Energy Corporation



|/s/ THOMAS A. NARDI |  |  | February 7, 2006
|------------------- |  |  | ----------------
|                    |  |  | Date            

Thomas A. Nardi
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company



|/s/ THOMAS A. NARDI |  |  | February 7, 2006
|------------------- |  |  | ----------------
|                    |  |  | Date            

Thomas A. Nardi
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of
North Shore Gas Company
#### Gates v. People.

A bill of exceptions to rulings of the court below, which is not sealed by the judge, will not be considered in the supreme court.

*Error to Conejos County Court.*

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

Mr. C. C. Holbrook, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Wells, Macon and McNeil, for defendant in error.

Rising, C.

The plaintiff in error was prosecuted, before a justice of the peace in the town of Alamosa, for the violation of an ordinance of said town “concerning drays and other vehicles,” and upon trial was convicted and fined. Thereafter the defendant presented to said justice a bond for an appeal, which, in form and condition, was sufficient to effect an appeal to the county court from a judgment in a civil case. This bond was approved and filed by the justice within ten days from the rendition of judgment in said case; and the same, with papers in the case, and a transcript of the judgment given by said justice, were by him duly filed in the office of the clerk of the county court of Oonejos county. In the steps taken to perfect an appeal, the requirements of the statute in relation to taking an appeal in criminal cases *293were not complied with. The case was docketed in the county court, and thereafter the appeal was dismissed by order and judgment of said court. Plaintiff in error complains of the ruling of the court in dismissing his appeal, and assigns error thereon. What purports to be a bill of exceptions is not sealed by the judge and cannot be considered. *De La Mar v. Hurd, 4*Colo. 442; *Mining Co. v. Kirtley,*8 Colo. 108. In the order of the court dismissing the appeal it is recited that to such ruling the defendant asks an exception, which is allowed by the court.” This recital can only be regarded as evidence of the right of the defendant to seasonably demand a bill of exceptions. It is not the same thing as a bill of exceptions, and cannot be so considered. *Pomeroy’s Lessee v. Bank,*1 Wall. 592-598.

Upon an examination of the case incident to the ruling upon .the foi-egoing points, we do not perceive any error in the ruling of the court below; but, for the reason that no exception to such ruling was saved, the questions attempted to be raised by the assignments of error are not before us for decision, and we ■ do not pass upon them. The judgment should be affirmed.

De Prance, C., concurs. Stallcup, C., dissents.

Per Curiam.

Por the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the judgment of the county court is affirmed. '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029308
   <NAME>  Account Portfolios LP
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                             224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     92,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,696
<PP&E>                                          68,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,093
<BONDS>                                         24,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,308
<SALES>                                         74,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,662
<CGS>                                           48,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                       314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,290
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          972
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,262
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57


</TABLE>