alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50664-50665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11370]


New Hampshire Disaster <greek-i>NH-00006

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Hampshire 
(FEMA-1782-DR), dated 08/11/2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornado, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/24/2008.

[[Page 50665]]

    Effective Date: 08/11/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/10/2008.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: Correction 
05/11/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/11/2008, private non-
profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Belknap, Carroll, Rockingham
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    New Hampshire: Coos, Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Strafford
    Maine: Oxford, York
    Massachusetts: Essex

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and for 
economic injury is 11370.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-19869 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
214 La. 499

#### STATE v. THOMAS.

No. 38977.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1948.

*150J. W. Jones, Jr., of Natchitoches, for appellant. ■

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst, Atty. Gen., J. Reuel Boone, Dist. Atty., of Many, and J. R. Ferguson, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Leesville, for appellee.

• PONDER, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors for sale in a parish where the sale of intoxicating liquors is prohibited, and sentenced to pay a fine of $400.00 and costs and, in default of payment of fine and costs, to be imprisoned in the parish jail for a period of five months. He has appealed.

During the course of the trial, a bill of exception was taken to the overruling of a motion for a continuance. The defendant’s counsel did not appear at the hearing of this appeal or file a brief in support of it. •

The motion for continuance was based on two grounds, viz.: first, that the fixing of the trial by the trial court on a date other than during a regular criminal term of court was illegal; and second, that the defendant’s counsel did not have sufficient time to prepare the defense.

Under the provisions of Section 42 of Article 7 of the Constitution of 1921 a district judge has authority to try a misdemeanor at any time. State v. Rogers, 157 La. 318, 102 So. 414.

The granting or refusal of a continuance rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed except where the discretion has been arbitrarily or unreasonably abused. Article 320, Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.

The defendant was arraigned orr March 1st, and his case was set for' trial for March 5th. The trial of the case was; postponed to March 6th to enable the defendant’s counsel to be present at the trial-There is nothing in the record to show that, the defendant was deprived of the attendance or testimony of any specific witness-Under the circumstances, the refusal of the continuance was not arbitrary or unreasonable.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction, and sentence are affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spartech
Corporation.


                                                Date: June 7, 2005


                                                ------------------------
                                                George A. Abd
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                ------------------------
                                                Randy C. Martin
                                                Executive Vice President -
                                                Corporate Development and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134021 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134021 COA: 264889 Oakland CC: 2005-201614-FH MICHAEL LEE PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2008-OS-0088]


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency is deleting a system of records 
notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This action will be effective without further notice on 
September 22, 2008 unless comments are received that would result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, 
Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DP, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 
2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency notices for 
systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address above.
    The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: August 15, 2008.
Patricia Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S100.90

System name:
    Attorney Personnel Information and Applicant Files (May 13, 2004, 
69 FR 26558).

Reason:
    Records are covered by OPM Government-wide Privacy Act systems of 
records notices.

 [FR Doc. E8-19509 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### CITY OF NEW PORT RICHEY et al. v. STATE ex rel. SMITH.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

July 9, 1936.

W. H. Brewton, of Dade City, for plaintiffs in error.

Baker & Ulmer, of Clearwater, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

All questions of law presented under the writ of error in this case have been heretofore determined adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error, except those embraced in the third and fifth questions, which challenge the authority of the court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring less than that which was required in the alternative writ, which questions have been determined repeatedly in accordance with the contentions of the plaintiff in error.

The alternative writ required provision for the payment of interest on interest coupons after maturity.

The peremptory writ required provision for the payment of interest coupons, but did not require provision for the payment of the interest on the coupons after maturity.

Because of the contention that in this regard the alternative writ required more then could legally be required, and because the peremptory writ was issued without amending the alternative writ so as to exclude this item, the judgment must be reversed, but without prejudice to amend the alternative writ, both in this regard and also so as to make it applicable to an available tax roll and thereupon to have issued a peremptory writ of mandamus in conformity therewith. City of Bradenton v. State, 118 Fla. 838, 160 So. 506, 100 A.L.R. 400.

So ordered.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6237 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6237

 To prevent the admission of any member or leader of the Revolutionary 
 Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) into the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2021

 Ms. Salazar (for herself, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Gimenez, 
 Mr. Cawthorn, Mr. Steube, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Van Drew, Ms. 
  Herrell, and Mr. Jackson) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent the admission of any member or leader of the Revolutionary 
 Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) into the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Foreign Adversaries Residing in 
our Communities Act'' or the ``No FARC Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTING ENTRY OF REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES OF COLOMBIA 
              (FARC) PARTICIPANTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 
consular officer shall deny all classes of immigrant and nonimmigrant 
visas to, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall deny admission 
into the United States to, any alien who the Secretary of State 
determines is a present member or was a former member of the 
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).
    (b) Waiver.--The President may waive the application of subsection 
(a) on a case-by-case basis only if the President determines and 
certifies in writing to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the 
Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on the Judiciary of 
the Senate that the admission of a specified alien is in the national 
interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11

                   SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   (In thousands, except per share data)


                                                    QUARTER ENDED
                                                -----------------------
                                                January 29, January 31,
                                                    2005        2004
                                                ----------   ----------
NET EARNINGS
  Basic net earnings                               $ 2,818    $  7,706
                                                   =======    ========

  Diluted net earnings                             $ 2,818    $  7,706
                                                   =======    ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
  Basic weighted average common shares
        outstanding                                 32,213      29,376
  Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise
        of options                                     484         409
                                                   -------    --------

  Diluted weighted average shares
         Outstanding                                32,697      29,785
                                                    ======    ========


NET EARNINGS PER SHARE:

  Basic                                            $   .09     $   .26
                                                   =======     =======

  Diluted                                          $   .09     $   .26
                                                   =======     =======
Exhibit 35.1.6.1

 

[Letterhead of PHH Mortgage]

 

Supplemental Servicer Compliance Statement

 

Deal Name: CMLTI 2006-AR3

 

This statement of compliance is being provided in accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The Undersigned hereby states that:

 

| 1. | I am an authorized officer of PHH Mortgage Corporation (the “Servicer”); |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the “Reporting Period” and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

By: /s/ Marc J. Hinkle

Name: Marc J. Hinkle

Title: Vice President

Date: March 7, 2007

 

PHH Investor number reference: 729
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of Hollysys Automation
Technologies Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Changli Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2013 and results of operations
of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2013.



| | /s/ Changli Wang |                        
| | ---------------- | -----------------------
| | Name:            | Changli Wang           
| | Title:           | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:            | September 27, 2013     



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,WMALT Series 2006-AR3 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) inall material respects, except for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., for whom I have insufficient information to base an assessment; and5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10–K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: None. The following unaffiliated parties did not provide sufficient information upon which reasonable reliance could be based:Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
EXHIBIT
99.1

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David A. Melman, the Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: /s/ David A. Melman
David A. MelmanPrincipal Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May
8, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                                WRITTEN STATEMENT



         In  connection   with  the  amended  Annual  Report  of  Electric  Fuel
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002
filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Avihai
Shen,  Vice  President - Finance  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  hereby  certify that to my  knowledge,  the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of  1934,  and the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Electric Fuel Corporation and will be retained by Electric Fuel
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




                       By:             /S/ AVIHAI SHEN
                            -------------------------------------------------
                             Avihai Shen, Vice President - Finance and CFO
                             (Chief Financial Officer)

Date:  May 8, 2003




<PAGE>
No. 72-1130.

#### Denham et al., dba Denham Co. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded with instructions to remand case to the National Labor Relations Board for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of *Burns International Security Services, Inc.*v. *NLRB,*406 U. S. 272 (1972). *FTC*v. *Sperry & Hutchinson Co.,*405 U. S. 233, 245-250 (1972); *SEC*v. *Chenery Corp.,*318 U. S. 80, 87-88 (1943).