U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Stalking: What Does it Take for Prosecutors to Hold Stalking Offenders Accountable?
NCJ Number
              301453

Date Published

2020
Length
              8 pages
Annotation
              This brief provides an overview of prosecutorial decision-making in cases that involve the stalking of an intimate partner.
Abstract
              The study defines “stalking” as “a pattern of behavior directed at a specific person that would make a reasonable person fear for the safety of themselves or others.” Anti-stalking laws exist in all 50 U.S. states, territories, and tribal and military codes. This brief focuses on a study that examined prosecutorial decision making in stalking cases based on a dataset of 268 arrests and non-arrests for domestic violence (DV) and stalking reported by the Rhode Island law enforcement agencies between 2001 and 2005. The study focused on 1) the victim, offender, and situational case characteristics that influenced the prosecutor’s decision to accept or reject stalking cases; and 2) the case characteristics that influenced prosecutors to charge a defendant with stalking rather than another DV-related offense. The strongest predictor of the prosecutor’s decision to accept a stalking case for prosecution was the alleged victim’s demeanor. Cases in which the victim was fearful were four times more likely to be accepted for prosecution. Also, cases in which the stalking behaviors occurred in public were three times more likely to be accepted for prosecution. The study’s overall conclusion is that stalking cases are likely to be prosecuted when the offenders’ behavior terrorizes the victim and jeopardizes the safety of the community. Based on these findings, this study recommends questions that both law enforcement investigators and prosecutors should pose in making investigative and prosecutorial decisions in allegations of stalking. Suggestions are offered for additional research on this issue. A suggested resource is the Stalking, Prevention, Awareness, and Resource Center (SPARC).
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2016-MU-CX-K011


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Award
        Rutgers Violence Against Women Consortium
    
  
  
Date Published: January 1, 2020
    
          Downloads
        
                      PDF

Related Datasets
        
                      https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38654.v1
                  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38659.v1
Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Social and Behavioral Science
        Violence Against Women Research Consortium (VAWRC)
        Courts
        Prosecution
        Prosecutorial discretion



  
Similar Publications
        
                      The Problem with Criminal Records: Discrepancies between State Reports and Private-sector Background Checks
                  Did Immigrant Arrest Rates Change During the Trump Administration? Evidence From California and Texas
                  Statistical Evaluation of Sectral Interferences in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov