alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6290 

AN ACT 

To provide for the establishment of a section of the website 

of the Department of Commerce that shall serve as the 

primary hub for information relating to Federal manufacturing programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6290 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Manufacturing.gov 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MANUFACTURING.GOV HUB. 

5 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Sec6 retary’’ means the Secretary of Commerce. 

7 (b) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after 

8 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordi9 nation with the Chief Information Officer of the Depart10 ment of Commerce, shall modify the manufacturing.gov 

11 website by establishing a section of the website to be 

12 known as the ‘‘manufacturing.gov hub’’. 

13 (c) FUNCTIONS.—The manufacturing.gov hub estab14 lished under subsection (b) shall— 

15 (1) serve as the primary hub for information re16 lating to every Federal manufacturing program, in17 cluding the programs identified in the report of the 

18 Government Accountability Office entitled ‘‘U.S. 

19 Manufacturing’’ (GAO 17–240), published on March 

20 28, 2017; 

21 (2) provide the contact information of relevant 

22 program offices carrying out the Federal manufac23 turing programs described in paragraph (1); 

24 (3) provide an avenue for public input and feed25 back relating to— 
3 

•HR 6290 EH

1 (A) the functionality of the website of the 

2 Department of Commerce; 

3 (B) the Federal manufacturing programs 

4 described in paragraph (1); and 

5 (C) any other manufacturing-related chal6 lenges experienced by manufacturers in the 

7 United States; 

8 (4) establish web pages within the hub that 

9 shall focus on— 

10 (A) technology and research and develop11 ment; 

12 (B) trade; 

13 (C) workforce development and training; 

14 (D) industrial commons and supply chains; 

15 and 

16 (E) small and medium manufacturers; and 

17 (5) use machine learning to— 

18 (A) identify frequently asked questions; 

19 and 

20 (B) disseminate to the public answers to 

21 the questions identified under subparagraph 

22 (A). 
4 

•HR 6290 EH

1 (d) NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS.—No additional funds 

2 are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of car3 rying out this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6290 

AN ACT 

To provide for the establishment of a section of the 

for other purposes. relating to Federal manufacturing programs, and shall serve as the primary hub for information website of the Department of Commerce that
#### John W. Kiesling, Appellant, v. Carrie Kiesling, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
237 So.2d 103

#### Ethel JONES and Thelma Jones v. Joseph P. SHOEMAKER and Tralice M. Shoemaker.

3 Div. 451.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 18, 1970.

J. B. Nix, Jr., Evergreen, for appellants.

Edwin C. Page, Jr., Evergreen, for appellees.

*54HARWOOD, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal from a decree rendered in a boundary line dispute.

On January 9, 1970, the respondents below (appellants here) filed a notice of appeal, and applied for an order fixing *the*amount required for a supersedeas bond which was fixed by the court on that same day at $2,000.00.

On January 20, 1970, the appellants filed security for costs of appeal, and also filed a supersedeas bond in the amount of $2,-000.00.

The transcript of the record was filed in this court on April 9, 1970. Appellants’ brief was filed on May 25, 1970, within the extension of time granted by this court. No oral argument was requested.

On June 4, 1970, counsel for appellees filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on two grounds, (1) that the transcript of the record was not filed in this court within sixty days from the time of taking the appeal as required by Supreme Court Rule 37, and (2) that the appeal was not taken within six months from the rendition of the decree in the lower court as required by Section 788, Title 7, Code of Alabama 1940.

The cause was submitted on June 4, 1970 on motion to dismiss, and on the merits.

The date of the taking of the appeal in this case was January 20, 1970, the day on which security for costs of appeal was filed. Danley v. Danley, 263 Ala. 390, 82 So.2d 534.

The transcript of the record therefore should have been filed in this court within sixty days after January 20, 1970, or on or before March 21, 1970, no extensions of time for filing the record in this court having been sought, nor in the court below. Supreme Court Rule 37; Section 769, Title 7, Code of Alabama 1940; Bodiford v. Ganus, 281 Ala. 244, 201 So.2d 400.

It is clear that Ground 1 of appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal is valid, and necessitates a dismissal of this appeal. Nettles v. Nettles, 283 Ala. 457, 218 So.2d 269.

This being so, no need arises to consider Ground 2 of the motion.

Record stricken; appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, MERRILL and McCALL, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6312

 To prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the rule submitted by 
   the Department of Health and Human Services relating to COVID-19 
         vaccine and mask requirements for Head Start programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2021

    Mrs. McClain (for herself, Mr. Allen, and Mr. Gooden of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the rule submitted by 
   the Department of Health and Human Services relating to COVID-19 
         vaccine and mask requirements for Head Start programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Mandates on Toddlers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING THE HHS RULE ON HEAD START COVID VACCINE 
              AND MASK REQUIREMENTS.

    Notwithstanding any other law, no funds appropriated or otherwise 
made available to the Department of Health and Human Services shall be 
obligated or expended to--
            (1) implement or enforce the rule submitted by the 
        Department of Health and Human Services relating to ``Vaccine 
        and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in 
        Head Start Programs'' (86 Fed. Reg. 68052 (November 30, 2021)); 
        or
            (2) promulgate, implement, or enforce any rule, regulation, 
        or other agency statement, that is substantially similar to the 
        rule described in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.19




LOAN
AGREEMENT
 September
11, 2008
 
 Richard N. Jeffs (the
“Lender”) of Flat 1, 49 Pont Street, London, SW1X 0DB, advanced US$50,000 (the “Principal
Sum”) to Red Lake Exploration, Inc. (the “Borrower”) of 195 Park Avenue, Thunder
Bay, Ontario, P7B 1B9.  The Lender advanced the funds on September 11,
2008.
  The
Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest
calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 8% per year (the “Interest”)
from September 11, 2008..  The Borrower is liable for repayment for
the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in
trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.
  The
Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the
Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
  LENDER
                      
                      
                      BORROWERRichard N.
      Jeffs
                      
                      
                      Red Metal Resources
      Ltd.Per:
                      
                      
                      Per:/s/
      Richard
      N. Jeffs
                      
                      
                      /s/
      Caitlin JeffsRichard
      N. Jeffs
                      
                      
                      Authorized
      Signatory
 
 1
  PROMISSORY
NOTE
  Principal
      Amount:  US$50,000
              September 11,
      2008
  For value
received, Red Lake Exploration, Inc. (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand
to the order of Richard N. Jeffs(the “Lender”) the sum
of $50,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”)
together with interest on the Principal Sum from September 11, 2008 (“Effective
Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate
as defined below.
 
 For the
purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 8 per cent per
year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded
monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective
rate of 8.3% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the
Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
 
 The
Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any
time.
 
 The
Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour
of this promissory note.
  BORROWERRed Metal Resources
      Ltd.Per:/s/
      Caitlin JeffsAuthorized Signatory
  2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,553)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,130
<PP&E>                                           6,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,475)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,033
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,135
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,884
<SALES>                                         28,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,540
<CGS>                                           22,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,462)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







May 5, 2009



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
No. 72-6105.

#### Fields *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEZHONG TIAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70144

Agency No. A099-047-161

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Dezhong Tian, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

APR 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70144

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse

credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590

F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA reasonably concluded Tian’s testimony was non-responsive to

several questions, appeared to be memorized, and lacked detail regarding his

religious practice in the United States. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility finding

reasonable under totality of circumstances). Therefore, the record does not compel

the conclusion Tian was credible. See Don v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 738, 745 (9th

Cir. 2007). In the absence of credible testimony, Tian’s asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection

because Tian’s CAT claim is based on the same statements the agency found not

credible, and there is no other evidence in the record that would compel a finding it

is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to China. See id. at 1156-

57. Accordingly, Tian’s CAT claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<table>

EXHIBIT 12.2
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in millions)
<caption>
                                                                             For the three
                                                                             months ended
                                                                             March 31,
                                1999        2000        2001        2002        2003
                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------

                           <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>
Fixed Charges:

Interest                          $ 62        $ 72        $ 70        $ 47        $ 14
Interest portion of
  annual rentals                     3           4           3           2           0
                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Total fixed charges
  for purpose of ratio            $ 65        $ 76        $ 73        $ 49        $ 14
                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Earnings:

Pretax income from
  continuing operations           $383        $390        $377       $391         $104
Add: Total fixed charges
  (from above)                      65          76          73         49           14
                              --------    --------    --------    -------    ---------
Total earnings for
  purpose of ratio                $448        $466        $450       $440         $118
                              ========    ========    ========    =======    =========
Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges                6.89        6.13        6.16       8.98         8.43
                              ========    ========    ========    =======    =========


</table>
#### *Abraham*R. ABRAHAM v. Frank BERRY.

No. 5108.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 2, 1936.

Gus A. Voltz, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Polk & Robinson, of Alexandria, for ap-pellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

When this case was called for argument, a motion to dismiss the appeal, signed' by the attorneys for both litigants, was offered and filed. It is well settled that an appeal will be dismissed when consent therefor is given by all parties in interest.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)*




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P.), a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, James C. Dyer, IV, Chief Executive Officer of Blueknight Energy Partners G.P, L.L.C. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.), and Alex G. Stallings, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Blueknight Energy Partners G.P, L.L.C. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.







/s/ James C. Dyer, IV


James C. Dyer, IV


Chief Executive Officer of


Blueknight Energy Partners G.P, L.L.C. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.),


general partner of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P.)




March 26, 2009







/s/ Alex G. Stallings


Alex G. Stallings


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of


Blueknight Energy Partners G.P, L.L.C. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.),
 general partner of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (formerly SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P.)




March 26, 2009









*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6221 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6221

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, as the ``James A. Rogers 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES A. ROGERS JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James A. Rogers Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James A. 
Rogers Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6221

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, as the ``James A. Rogers 
                           Jr. Post Office''.
```
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Annual Report of Proper Power and Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph E. Abdo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  PROPER POWER AND ENERGY, INC.  /s/:  Joseph E. Abdo JOSEPH E. ABDO, Chief Executive Officer   March 31, 2010
exhibit_10-1.htm










Exhibit 10.1




 


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


 


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-54356, 333-117849, 333-136633, 333-158983, 333-164064, 333-173480 and 333-187953) pertaining to the Ceragon Networks Ltd. (“Ceragon”) Amended and Restated Share Option and RSU Plan of our reports dated April 30, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ceragon and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ceragon, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013.


 



	  

Tel-Aviv, Israel


April 30, 2014

	

/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERE


KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER


A Member of Ernst & Young Global