alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED MARCH 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000075608
<NAME> PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       1,753,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,522,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,095,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 52,212,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           118,591,000
<PP&E>                                     120,022,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              69,220,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             223,235,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,007,000
<BONDS>                                     82,136,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,220,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  83,713,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               223,235,000
<SALES>                                     72,464,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,464,000
<CGS>                                       49,286,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,519,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               539,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               107,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             799,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,120,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,402,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,718,000
<DISCONTINUED>                            (13,563,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,845,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6037 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from 

directly making loans under the 7(a) loan program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, Mr. HAGEDORN, 

Mr. STAUBER, Mr. MEUSER, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. GARBARINO, Mrs. KIM

of California, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. DONALDS, Ms. SALAZAR, and Mr. 

FITZGERALD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from directly making loans under the 7(a) loan 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON DIRECT 7(a) LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of 

5 subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 636(a)), the Administrator of the Small Business 

7 Administration may not directly make a loan pursuant to 

8 such subsection. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6037 IH

1 (b) EXISTING LOANS.—The Administrator of the 

2 Small Business Administration shall service a direct loan 

3 made under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 636(b)) if such loan was made before the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,259,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,215,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,098,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (203,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,319,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,736,000
<PP&E>                                       4,621,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,334,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,844,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,090,000
<BONDS>                                      3,976,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       912,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,295,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,844,000
<SALES>                                     12,346,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,346,000
<CGS>                                        7,217,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,217,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,504,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             251,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                674,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,200,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,874,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,874,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         $68,914                $416,016
<SECURITIES>                                        $0                      $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $95,118                $884,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                        $0                      $0
<INVENTORY>                                 $8,504,159              $6,377,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $9,709,602              $8,140,521
<PP&E>                                     $19,406,818             $18,481,933
<DEPRECIATION>                             $13,601,636             $12,979,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $16,213,959             $14,373,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $4,266,286              $3,567,606
<BONDS>                                     $2,409,333              $2,563,136
<COMMON>                                      $174,926                $174,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0                      $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0                      $0
<OTHER-SE>                                 $10,025,804              $8,561,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $16,213,959             $14,373,541
<SALES>                                       $819,380              $1,326,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $836,702              $1,351,857
<CGS>                                         $789,790                $877,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $789,790                $877,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $179,295                $180,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $40,975                 $54,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(779,140)              $(310,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        $0                      $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $(779,140)              $(310,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      $0                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0                      $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0                      $0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(779,140)              $(310,799)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  $(1.50)                  $(.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(1.50)                  $(.60)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-70034

BRENT RAY BREWER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This court reversed the district court’sjudgment conditionally granting a writ ofhabeas corpus. B rewer v. Dretke , 442 F.3d 273 (5th Cir. 2006) (reversing Brewer v. Dretke

, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14761 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2004)). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 27, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-70034

2 Supreme Court reversed. Brewer v. Quarterman, 127 S. Ct. 1706 (2007). The state acknowledges that in light of the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari in Nelson v. Quarterman, 472 F.3d 287 (5th Cir. 2006) (en banc), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 2974 (2007), this court should remand for re-entry of the conditional grant of habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED so that the district court can re-enter itsjudgment to provide that a writ shall issue, vacating the sentence and commuting it to life imprisonment unless, within 180days of the re-entry ofjudgment, the state grants a newsentencing hearing or commutes the sentence to life imprisonment.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6350 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require disclosures 

to contributors regarding recurring contributions or donations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 27, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

require disclosures to contributors regarding recurring 

contributions or donations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rescuing Every Con5 tributor from Unwanted Recurrences (RECUR) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURES TO CONTRIBUTORS RE7 GARDING RECURRING CONTRIBUTIONS OR 

8 DONATIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 318(d) of the Federal 

10 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30120(d)) is 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6350 IH

1 amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(3) COMMUNICATIONS THAT SOLICIT RECUR4 RING CONTRIBUTIONS OR DONATIONS.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any person soliciting 

6 a recurring contribution to a political com7 mittee, a recurring contribution to fund an 

8 independent expenditure, or a recurring dona9 tion to fund an electioneering communication 

10 must receive the affirmative consent of the con11 tributor or donor at the arrangement of the re12 curring contribution or donation. Passive action 

13 by the contributor or donor, such as failing to 

14 uncheck a pre-checked box authorizing a recur15 ring contribution, shall not meet the require16 ment of affirmative consent under this subpara17 graph. 

18 ‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—Any person ac19 cepting a recurring contribution or donation de20 scribed in subparagraph (A) shall— 

21 ‘‘(i) provide a receipt for an initial 

22 contribution or donation and each recur23 rence that clearly and conspicuously dis24 closes all material terms; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6350 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) provide all information needed to 

2 cancel recurring contributions or donations 

3 in each communication with the contrib4 utor or donor that concerns the contribu5 tion or donation; and 

6 ‘‘(iii) shall immediately cancel recur7 ring contributions or donations upon re8 quest of the contributor or donor.’’. 

9 (b) DEADLINE FOR REGULATIONS.—Not later than 

10 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Fed11 eral Election Commission shall promulgate regulations to 

12 carry out this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Scotter CLARK, Appellant.

No. 02-3367.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 30, 2002.

Decided Nov. 18, 2002.

Before MCMILLIAN, MURPHY, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Scotter Clark, an inmate in the federal correctional facility in Greenville, Illinois, appeals from the final order entered in the District Court1 for the Northern District *803of Iowa, denying his postsenteneing motions to correct his presentence report (PSR) and his judgment and commitment (J & C), and for reconsideration. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.

In October 2001, more than a year after he was sentenced, Clark moved in the sentencing court — purportedly pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 — to correct his PSR and his J *&*C; he later cited Fed. R. Grim P. 36 as a basis for the motion. On May 9, 2002, the district court entered its order denying Clark’s motion, with certain exceptions. On June 3 Clark filed a motion to reconsider, which the court denied in an order entered on July 25. On September 18 Clark filed a notice of appeal designating both orders.

Under the appeal time limits for criminal appeals, Clark’s notice of appeal is untimely as to both orders he seeks to appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(l)(A)(i) (in criminal case, notice of appeal must be filed within 10 days of entry of judgment or order being appealed); *United States v. Austin,*217 F.3d 595, 597 (8th Cir.2000) (timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional, and timeliness may be raised sua sponte). Further, Clark’s motion for reconsideration did not toll the period for filing a notice of appeal as to the original order, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(3); *Austin,*217 F.3d at 597 (while federal rules provide for renewed appeals period after ruling on some criminal postjudgment motions, motion for “reconsideration” is not listed among them); and in any event, the September 18 notice of appeal was untimely even as to the July 25 entry of the order denying his motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we must dismiss Clark’s appeal as untimely.

We note that the relief Clark seeks might be available under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, *see United States v. Leath,*711 F.2d 119 (8th Cir.1983), although he must file such a petition in the district court for the district in which he is confined, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, or in any district in which the Bureau of Prisons maintains a regional office, *see United States v. Chappel,*208 F.3d 1069, 1069-70 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam).

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, United States Circuit Judge, sitting by designation as *803United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         480
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  800,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               800,480
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,052,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,625
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,015,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,052,980
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  484,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (484,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (484,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (484,954)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
#### Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-2081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; George G. Davidson, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Pernorris Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for failure to file a more definite statement as instructed by the magistrate judge’s prior order. Because Taylor may be able to proceed with this action by amending his complaint by filing a more definite statement, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. *See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000075448
<NAME> NSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             385<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,513)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,345
<PP&E>                                          23,712<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,168)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F4>
<COMMON>                                         1,131
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,547
<SALES>                                         10,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,917
<CGS>                                            9,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   978<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,415)<F6>
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
<FN>
<F1>Cash includes restricted cash of $23.
<F2>PP&E includes goodwill and other intangible assets of $17,739.
<F3>Accumulated depreciation includes accumulated amortization of goodwill and
other intangible assets of $1,312.
<F4>Preferred stock includes five series of convertible preferred stock, however,
the par value is less than $1.
<F5>Other expenses represents depreciation and amortization.
<F6>Net income(loss) does not include dividends on convertible preferred stock of
$633.  The net loss attributable to common shareholders is ($7,048).
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of CPG International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Harrison, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as            adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

|  

Date:   March 31, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ SCOTT HARRISON                                                |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   |   | Scott Harrison                                                    |
|                                     |   |   | Executive Vice President, 

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
EFH-2013.12.31-Exhibit 10(bb)






Exhibit 10(bb)


Director Compensation Arrangements
Directors who are current or former officers of Energy Future Holdings Corp. or employed by the Sponsor Group do not receive any fees for their service as directors. Mmes. Acosta and Williamson and Messrs. Reilly and Youngblood receive $200,000 annually.