alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         22,800
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 108,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   185,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              342,000
<PP&E>                                        234,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 36,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                897,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         324,100
<BONDS>                                       241,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          200
<OTHER-SE>                                    104,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  897,200
<SALES>                                       279,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              279,400
<CGS>                                         216,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 216,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               44,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                      400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.53


</TABLE>
EX-34 (c)

[LOGO] Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Two World Financial Center
New York, NY 10281-1414
USA

Tel: +1 212 436 2000
Fax: +1 212 436 5000
www.deloitte.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of
ARCap Servicing, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria, that
ARCap Servicing, Inc. (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's (the "SEC")
Regulation AB for the SEC Regulation AB Regulated Transactions Servicing
Platform (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006,
excluding the following criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(3)(i) -
(d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(ii), and (d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not
applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the
Platform. Appendix A to management's assertion identifies the individual
asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the
Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the SEC Regulation AB Regulated Transactions Servicing
Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 14, 2007


Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raj Rajeswaran, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/ RAJ RAJESWARAN                   
|Raj Rajeswaran                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        



Date:  May 31, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sentry Petroleum Ltd. and will be retained by Sentry Petroleum Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ike LA HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ӔTNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4459.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1934.

Hardin *&*Coleman, of Shreveport', for appellant.

Pegues & Pegues, of Mansfield, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case of case No. 4458 on the docket of this court, 156 So. 366, decided this day.

For the reasons assigned in case No. 4458, the judgment of the lower court in this case is reversed, and the demands of plaintiff are rejected, at his cost in both courts.
##### 



Exhibit 15 Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549 Commissioners: We are aware that our report dated October 26, 2004 on our review of the interim financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation (the Company) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and included in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-104627, 333-67606, 333-61624 and 333-43890), Registration Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-44380 and 333-36415), Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442, 33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362, 33-62648, 333-117382, 333-42231 and 333-52175) and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061). Very truly yours, /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
October 28, 2004
Exhibit 32.4



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







May 2, 2007



/S/  Dennis V. ArriolaDennis V. ArriolaChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.7

 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE

CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC.

2009 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 (the “Amendment”), dated as of April 10, 2014, to the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. (the “Company”), is hereby adopted by the Company.

 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan;

 

WHEREAS, subject to certain limitations, Sections 15.1 of the Plan gives the Board the authority to amend the Plan;

 

WHEREAS, the Board, based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board, has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its subsidiaries to amend the Plan to include a provision providing for delayed delivery of awards in certain circumstances to certain participants pursuant to Code Section 409A; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to make the amendments to the Plan described above.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Effective as of the date hereof, the following is added to Section 14.3 of the Plan:

 

“To the extent required by Section 409A of the Code, if a Grantee is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code and would be eligible to receive an Option and/or Award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, such Grantee will not be entitled to such Option and/or Award upon a termination of his or her employment until the earlier of (i) the expiration of the six (6)-month period measured from the date of such Grantee’s “separation from service” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) or (ii) the date of such Grantee’s death. Upon the expiration of any applicable 409A deferral period, all payments and benefits deferred pursuant to this Section 14.3 will be paid or reimbursed to such Grantee in a lump sum as soon as practicable, but in no event later than thirty (30) days following such expired period, and any remaining payments due under this Plan will be paid in accordance with the normal payment dates specified for them herein.”

 

*                                         *                                         *

 

2.                                      Except as expressly amended herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

3.                                      This Amendment has been executed on this 10th day of April, 2014.

 

 

	
 
    	
CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Cary W. Martin
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Its:
    	
SVP-Human Resources
    
				


 

Amendment No. 4 to the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Chief Financial Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:
(1)     the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for the quarterly period ended
September  30,  2006  (the  "Periodic  Report") which this statement accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
(2)     information  contained  in  the  Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: November 10, 2006
                                   /s/ Mitchell Binder
                                   -------------------
                                   Mitchell Binder
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6318 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6318

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain tax 
   benefits related to empowerment zones to the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2021

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain tax 
   benefits related to empowerment zones to the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TREATED AS EMPOWERMENT ZONE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1391(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: ``There shall be 
treated as an empowerment zone designated under this section so much of 
the District of Columbia as would result in the largest area within 
such District meeting the eligibility requirements for designation 
under section 1391. Deemed treatment under the preceding sentence shall 
not be taken into account in determining the number of empowerment 
zones which may be designated under this section.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to periods beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### PHONOMETRICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IIT SHERATON CORP., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1208.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 13, 2002.

Before PAULINE NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36
#### CONTEMPORARY SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Local 1877, AFL-CIO-CLC, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 01-16635. D.C. No. CV-01-00682-CW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 2002.*

Decided Nov. 12, 2002.

Before HAWKINS, GRABER, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

“[WJhere [a labor agreement] contains an arbitration clause, there is a presumption of arbitrability.” *AT & T Techs., Inc. v. Communications Workers of Am.,*475 U.S. 643, 650, 106 S.Ct. 1415, 89 L.Ed.2d 648 (1986). “ ‘An order to arbitrate the particular grievance should not be denied unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute. Doubts should be resolved in favor of coverage.’ ” *Id.*(quoting *United Steelworkers of Am. v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.,*363 U.S. 574, 582-83, 80 S.Ct. 1347, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960)).

The collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between Contemporary Services Corporation (“Contemporary”) and Services Employees International Union, Local 1877 (the “Union”) is ambiguous as to whether its grievance and arbitration provision applies to Contemporary-initiated claims. In the face of such an ambiguity, ‘“[d]oubts should be resolved in favor of [arbitration].’ ” *Id.*“In the absence of any express provision excluding a particular grievance from arbitration, we think only the most forceful evidence of a purpose to exclude the claim from arbitration can prevail....” *Warrior & Gulf,*363 U.S. at 584-85, 80 S.Ct. at 1354. Here, nothing in Article 12 of the CBA specifically states that it does not apply to claims brought by Contemporary. Further, Article 14 of the CBA strongly supports resolving the ambiguity of Article 12 in favor of arbitration of Contemporary’s claim.

Contemporary’s citation to *Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.,*370 U.S. 238, 82 S.Ct. 1318, 8 L.Ed.2d 462 (1962), *overruled on other grounds by Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770,*398 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 1583, 26 L.Ed.2d 199 (1970), does not change the analysis. *Atkinson*held that an arbitration provision did not apply to company-initiated claims where the provision stated that the arbitrator “shall consider only individual or local employee or local committee grievances.... ” *Id.*at 243, 82 S.Ct. at 1322. Unlike the arbitration provision in *Atkinson,*Article 12 in no way limits the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.

The district court’s dismissal is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit** **23.1**

 

**CONSENT      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We    hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements    on Form S-3 (File No. 333-145812) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-137589)    of our report dated March 17, 2008, relating    to the  financial statements, financial statement schedules and    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears    in Security Capital Assurance Ltd’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the    year ended December 31, 2007. We also consent to the reference to us under    the heading “Experts” in each such Registration Statement. 

| /s/                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New YorkMarch    17, 2008

 

 

 

 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-10 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6427 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6427

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Red River National Wildlife Refuge Act to modify the 
   boundary of the Red River National Wildlife Refuge, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Red River National Wildlife Refuge 
Boundary Modification Act''.
SEC. 2. RED RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.
    Section 3(a)(1) of the Red River National Wildlife Refuge Act 
(Public Law 106-300; 114 Stat. 1055) is amended by striking ``map 
entitled `Red River National Wildlife Refuge--Selection Area', dated 
September 5, 2000'' and inserting ``map entitled `Red River National 
Wildlife Refuge Acquisition Boundary' and dated March 21, 2022''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```