alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6438 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of the site known as ‘‘Dearfield’’ in the State of Colorado. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2022 

Mr. BUCK (for himself and Mr. NEGUSE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of the site known as ‘‘Dearfield’’ 

in the State of Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dearfield Study Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

6 In this Act: 

7 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

8 the Secretary of the Interior. 

9 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

10 means the site known as ‘‘Dearfield’’, in Weld CounVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:32 Jan 21, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6438.IH H6438

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6438 IH

1 ty, Colorado, which was a historically black agricul2 tural settlement founded by Oliver Toussaint Jack3 son. 

4 SEC. 3. DEARFIELD SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 

6 special resource study of the study area. 

7 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub8 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

9 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

10 study area; 

11 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

12 designating the study area as a unit of the National 

13 Park System; 

14 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

15 protection, and interpretation of the study area by 

16 the Federal Government, State or local government 

17 entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

18 (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, 

19 State or local governmental entities, private and 

20 nonprofit organizations, or any other interested indi21 viduals; and 

22 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac23 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

24 maintenance associated with the alternatives de25 scribed in paragraphs (2) and (3). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6438 IH

1 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

2 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec3 tion 100507 of title 54, United States Code. 

4 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

5 on which funds are first made available to carry out the 

6 study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to 

7 the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

9 Resources of the Senate a report that describes— 

10 (1) the results of the study; and 

11 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

12 Secretary. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. J.T, DOB: 3/28/95, Appellant. No. 70033-2-1 DIVISION ONE o e3 —KCZ 

# UNPUBLISHEDOPINION % ^o FILED: April 7, 2014 ^. ££c

« So 

### PER CURIAM. J.T. appeals a juvenile court disposition finding himguilty of co 

### one count offourth degree assault. J.T.'s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faithargument on review. Pursuantto State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. 

### California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion to
withdraw must: 

### [1] be accompanied by a briefreferring to anythingin the record that 

### might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel's briefshould be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points 

### that he chooses; [4] the court-notcounsel-then proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whetherthe case iswholly frivolous. 

### Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744). 

### This procedure has been followed. J.T.'s counsel on appealfiled a briefwith the motion to withdraw. J.T. was served with a copy ofthe brief and informed of theNo. 70033-2-1/2 right to file a statement ofadditional grounds for review. He did not file a statement of additional grounds. The facts are accurately set forth in counsel's briefin support ofthe motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has independently reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential issues raised by counsel: 1. Whether the trial court erred in finding that J.T. did not act in selfdefense? 

### 2. Whetherthe charging document adequately informed J.T. ofthe elements ofthe charge? 

### The potential issues are wholly frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

For the court: 

# £b*,J •
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40687 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DEVIN DEVON DOMIO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-120-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Devin Devon Domio appeals his sentence in his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. He contends that the information in the PSR was unreliable and that the PSR relied on multiple hearsay. Domio bears the burden of proving that the information in the PSR is inaccurate or unreliable. United States v. Angulo , 927 F.2d 202, 205 (5th Cir. 1991). If hearsay evidence has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probableNo. 97-40687 -2- accuracy, a district court may consider it when making sentencing decisions. United States v. Billingsley , 978 F.2d 861, 866 (5th Cir. 1992). Domio admitted his conduct in selling crack cocaine to his customers every 7 to 10 days. These customers included various persons who in turn informed the confidential informant that the source of their crack cocaine was Domio. Thus, the hearsay and the PSR had a sufficient indicia of reliability. See United States v. Puig-Infante , 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir. 1994). Further, Domio has submitted no evidence to contradict the information in the PSR. In the absence of any rebuttal evidence, the district court was not clearly erroneous in relying on the PSR, even if the PSR relied on hearsay. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in calculating Domio’s relevant conduct. See United States v. Mergerson , 4 F.3d 337, 345 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6415 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks 

from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2022 

Mr. EMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal 

reserve banks from offering certain products or services 

directly to an individual, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS 

4 RELATING TO CERTAIN PRODUCTS OR SERV5 ICES FOR INDIVIDUALS. 

6 Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(15) Except as specifically authorized under 

9 this Act, a Federal reserve bank may not offer prodVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:12 Jan 21, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6415.IH H6415

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6415 IH

1 ucts or services directly to an individual, maintain 

2 an account on behalf of an individual, or issue a cen3 tral bank digital currency directly to an individual.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Joseph A. Molino, Jr.  |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A. Molino, Jr.       |
| Principal Financial Officer |
| May 13, 2005                |
Exhibit
32






Certification
pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Marshall
T. Reynolds, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Larry A. Blount, Chief
Financial Officer of Energy Services of America Corporation (the “Company”) each
certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the
annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2008 and that to the best of their knowledge:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











December 29,
      2008
            /s/
      Marshall
      T. ReynoldsDate
            Marshall
      T. ReynoldsChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 29,
      2008
            /s/
      Larry
      A. BlountDate
            Larry
      A. BlountChief
      Financial Officer








The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Energy Services of America Corporation and will be retained by Energy Services
of America Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
CHADRICK PRAY

,
Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et c

. ,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 1 258

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. Phillip Pena

, J udge

.
Chadrick Pray , pro se , Appellant

.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Anne Conley

, Assistant Attorney General, and Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Tallahassee , for Appellee Department of Corrections

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### McCUNE v. GREFER.

No. 17703.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 31, *1942.*

Frank H. Langridge, of Gretna, for appellant.

Nat B. Knight, Jr., of Gretna, for ap-pellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit for $445, the balance alleged to be due on a promissory note originally calling for $475, dated April 20, 1937, and due six months after date and bearing five per cent, interest.

The defendant, A. J. Grefer, admits his signature to the note, but contends that a number of payments which he made have not been acknowledged and that these payments, when properly credited, reduce the amount due on the note to the sum of $221.-70, which he admits to be due and owing plaintiff.

The sole question involved is whether the defendant made the payments he claims to have made.

*109•There was judgment below in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $221.70 and he has appealed.

We do not find any testimony in the record. There is, however, a “Statement of Fact”, from which it appears that the defendant originally issued his promissory note for $475 in recognition of a loan which he had received from his aunt, Miss Katherine Strehle, who subsequently died, after having bequeathed the note to the present plaintiff, Ira C. McCune. It is also admitted that during the trial defendant produced a memorandum kept in a small book and styled “Aunt Kittie Account”, according to which certain payments were made to decedent amounting in all to a sufficient sum to reduce the obligation to the amount admitted to be due, $221.70. It is also admitted that defendant had testified that all of these payments were made in cash at his aunt’s request, some of which were made by himself and others by his son and his mother.

This ' testimony of defendant, which is admitted to have been given during the trial below, if believed, is sufficient to sustain the judgment appealed from. There is no countervailing proof and we believe the case is controlled by the familiar rule to the effect that findings of the trial court on questions of fact, unless manifestly erroneous, should be affirmed, consequently, and

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) of KMA Global Solutions
International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Jeffrey
D. Reid, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:






(1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/ Jeffrey D. Reid
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. 1350
   Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
  (a)   The annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and
  (b)   Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Dated:  May 2, 2011
   /s/ Caitlin Jeffs
 Caitlin Jeffs, Chief Executive Officer and President
 
 
 /s/ John Da Costa
 John Da Costa, Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I,  Jimmy  S.H.  Lee,  Chief Executive Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that:

     (1)  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
          period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements  of  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d));  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

Dated:  November  13,  2003


                                              /s/  Jimmy  S.H.  Lee
                                              -----------------------
                                              Jimmy S.H. Lee
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                          _____________________________

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Mercer  International  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Mercer
International  Inc.  and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its  staff  upon  request.
Exhibit 4.1




	
  

  	
  ICC
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMMON STOCK SEE REVERSE
  FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 85172J 10 1 THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD
  HOLDER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR
  VALUE, OF 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. transferable only on the books
  of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender
  of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless
  countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registered by the Registrar. IN
  WITNESS whereof, the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly
  authorized officers. Dated: TREASURER PRESIDENT AND VICE CHAIRMAN
  COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY,
  LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 21st
  Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. 

  






 


 












	
  

  	
  UNIF GIFT MIN
  ACT– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) The
  following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
  certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
  according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN as
  tenants in common as tenants by the entireties as joint tenants with right of
  survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also
  be used though not in the above list. – – – of the common stock represented
  by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
  to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
  full power of substitution in the premises. Dated For value received, hereby
  sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE Shares Attorney PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME
  AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: THE
  SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
  STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP
  IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
  RULE 17Ad-15. THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
  AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
  ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. NOTICE:
#### Craig E. COASH, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 01-35720.

D.C. No. CV-99-00431-BLW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 2002.*

Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

Before TROTT, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Craig E. Coash appeals the district court’s order granting Union Pacific Railroad Company’s motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration of record, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the thorough report and recommendations issued by Magistrate Judge Boyle.1

Coash is hereby ordered to file a brief within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order showing cause why, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 38, sanctions should not be imposed for filing a frivolous appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Although we could dismiss this case for Coash’s failure to submit a brief in compliance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, *see N/S Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.,*127 F.3d 1145, 1146 (9th Cir. 1997), we elect to decide it on the merits.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William R. TALLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7321.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

William R. Talley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*165PER CURIAM.

William R. Talley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Talley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Talley,*Nos. CR-99-5S0; CA-01-2420-6-13 (D.S.C. filed July 25, 2002 & entered July 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*