alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-2-



Exhibit (32)

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Michael H. Thaman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael H. Thaman  
|Chief Financial Officer

October 25, 2006
#### Juanita Wilson v. State.

No. 25036.

December 13, 1950.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the killing with malice of Willie Wilson and assessed a term of 25 years in the state penitentiary, and she appeals.

There is neither statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. However, we do find in the transcript a motion to quash the indictment alleging the same to be void for uncertainty in that it is alleged therein that appellant killed Willie Wilson by “striking him with a hammer.” The gist of such motion is that such allegation should have set out what kind of a hammer the appellant is alleged to have struck him with, “whether a claw-hammer, a blacksmith’s hammer, a ball-pin hammer, a sledge-hammer, a tack-hammer, or some other kind of hammer, so that the appellant is not properly informed of and is not able to plead to the charge contained in the indictment.” We think the word “hammer” has a well known and accepted meaning as described in Webster’s New International Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd Edition, as follows: “An instrument for driving nails, beating metals, and the like, consisting of a head, usually of steel or iron, fixed crosswise to a handle.”

The sufficiency of the testimony is also complained of, but *324in the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to review the same.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-81-000]


Judith Gap Energy LLC and Northwestern Corporation; Notice of 
Filing

August 20, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 12, 2008, Judith Gap Energy LLC (Judith 
Gap) and Northwestern Corporation (Northwestern) filed a petition for 
declaratory order requesting the Commission to determine whether Judith 
Gap, pursuant to terms of its executed Large Generator Interconnection 
Agreement (LGIA) with Northwestern is entitled to Network Resource 
Interconnection Service for up to 188 MW, notwithstanding that Judith 
Gap, to date, has placed into commercial operation 135 MW of the total 
188 MW contemplated under the LGIA.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#63252631202c0d0f0a0d06301613130c111723050611004d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5939087969abbb9bcbbb086a0a5a5baa7a195b3b0a7b6fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 11, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19811 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6414 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6414

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to prohibit any conditions 
of participation under the Medicare or Medicaid programs that include a 
                        vaccine or drug mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2022

  Mr. Crenshaw (for himself and Mr. Duncan) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to prohibit any conditions 
of participation under the Medicare or Medicaid programs that include a 
                        vaccine or drug mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Mandates for Healthcare Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION IN MEDICARE AND 
              MEDICAID.

    Part A of title XI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301 et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 1150D. PROHIBITION ON CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION IN MEDICARE 
              AND MEDICAID.

    ``The Secretary shall not have the authority to require any drug 
(as defined in section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act) or vaccine or other biological product (as defined in 
section 351(i)(1) of the Public Health Service Act) be administered to 
employees of a provider of services as a condition of participation in 
the Medicare and Medicaid programs.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jack M. Laskowitz, as Chief Financial Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Paradise, Inc.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |  |  |                   
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------
|/s/ Jack M. Laskowitz                 |  |  |  | Date: May 14, 2009
|Jack M. Laskowitz                     |  |  |  |                   
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  |  |  |
#### Rutherfurd Realty Company v. Willet F. Cook and Others.

Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 23, 1995 AND JUNE 24, 1995; AND
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH
PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 23, 1995 AND DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-25-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-23-1995
<CASH>                                       1,267,629
<SECURITIES>                                 1,199,846
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,283,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                   103,264
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,988,417
<PP&E>                                         656,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 246,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,768,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,110,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          682,870
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,067
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,909,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,768,825
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,995,365
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                415,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                   164,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            251,523
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
- 37 -              Exhibit (11)
                                                            
               OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              
              COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
                              
<S>                               <C>      <C>        <C>        <C>
                                       Quarter         Six Months
                                        Ended             Ended
                                       June 30,          June 30,
                                   1998       1997    1998        1997
                               (In millions of dollars, except share data)

Basic:

Net income                        $    59     $    63    $    67   $    105

Basic weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding
   (thousands)                     53,562      52,945     53,464     52,642

Basic per share amount            $  1.09     $  1.19    $  1.25    $  1.99

Diluted:

Net income                        $    61     $    65    $    71    $   109
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding (thousands)   53,563      52,945     53,465     52,642
Weighted average common equivalent
  shares (thousands):
  Deferred awards                      16          14         16         14
  Stock options using the
     average market price
     during the period                746         689        605        757
  Shares from assumed conversion
     of preferred securities        4,566       4,566      4,566      4,566

Diluted weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding and
  common equivalent shares 
  (thousands)                      58,891      58,214     58,652     57,979

Diluted per share amount         $   1.02     $  1.11    $  1.20    $  1.88

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratasys, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, S. Scott Crump,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 ****Date:
      March 14, 2005
    By:
    /s/  S.
      Scott CrumpS.
      Scott CrumpChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit      32(a)**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company,                Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                THOMAS M. PATRICK |   |   | February                9, 2007 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                            |

| /s/                THOMAS M. PATRICK |   |   | February                9, 2007 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                            |

| /s/                THOMAS M. PATRICK |   |   | February                9, 2007 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                            |
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6364 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation 

Area Improvement Act to extend the exception to the 

closure of certain roads within the Recreation Area for 

local businesses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 6364 RFS

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CERTAIN ROADS WITHIN THE DELA2 WARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION 

3 AREA. 

4 Section 4(b) of the Delaware Water Gap National 

5 Recreation Area Improvement Act (Public Law 109–156; 

6 119 Stat. 2948) is amended in the matter preceding para7 graph (1), by striking ‘‘Until’’ and all that follows through 

8 ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘Until September 30, 

9 2026, subsection (a)’’. 

10 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

11 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

12 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

13 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

14 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

15 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

16 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro17 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

18 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit (32)



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report), I, David T. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David T. Brown     
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 4, 2004
Exhibit 32(a)



PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the combined Quarterly Report of Peoples Energy Corporation (the "Company"), The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company ("Peoples Gas") and North Shore Gas Company ("North Shore Gas") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Patrick, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas.



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | February 9, 2005
|--------------------- |  |  | ----------------
|                      |  |  | Date            

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board, 
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Peoples Energy Corporation



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | February 9, 2005
|--------------------- |  |  | ----------------
|                      |  |  | Date            

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company



|/s/ THOMAS M. PATRICK |  |  | February 9, 2005
|--------------------- |  |  | ----------------
|                      |  |  | Date            

Thomas M. Patrick
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
North Shore Gas Company
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL R. BARNA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 392 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Moses H. Phillips and Another v. Isaac Van Leer and Others.

Motion granted, on payment of ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.
#### Tony A. HAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sidney HARKLEROAD, Respondent-Appellee, and Dean R. Walker, Superintendent, Respondent.

No. 03-6587.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.

Decided Aug. 21, 2003.

Tony A. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*282PER CURIAM.

Tony A. Hawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hawkins has not made the requisite showing. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### John B. ADRAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYPERTECH, INC., DefendantAppellee.

No. 02-1514.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 31, 2002.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

John B. Adrain moves for reconsideration of the court’s September 10, 2002 order dismissing Adrain’s appeal for failure to pay the docketing fee.* Hypertech, Inc. opposes. Adrain replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted, the mandate is recalled, the order dismissing for failure to pay the docketing fee is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) Hypertech should compute its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

*

 The filing fee has now been paid.