alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.24



 Exhibit 10.24 

Power of Attorney 
 I, [—], a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) with ID No. of            , is the shareholder of [—] holding [—]% equity interest of [—], and hereby irrevocably authorize the person designated by
Zhilian Wangpin (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd (“Zhilian Wangpin”) with the following powers and rights during the period of validity of this Power of Attorney: 

I hereby authorize the person appointed by Zhilian Wangpin to exercise, on my behalf, all my rights as shareholder in accordance with PRC laws and [—]’s Articles of Association at the shareholders’ meetings of [—], including but not limited to the right to call the shareholder’s
meeting, accept the notice regarding the shareholders’ meeting and its discussion procedures, attend the shareholders’ meeting and exercise all voting rights represented by the [—]% of [—] (including acting as my authorized representative to elect, designate or appoint the director, general manager, financial controller or other senior management personnel, to decide such matters as
distribution of dividend), and to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest held in [—]. 
 Such
authorization and appointment are based upon the precondition that such person designated by Zhilian Wangpin is acting as an employee of Zhilian Wangpin or its affiliates and Zhilian Wangpin consents to such authorization and appointment in writing.
Once such person designated by Zhilian Wangpin ceases to act as an employee of Zhilian Wangpin or its affiliates or Zhilian Wangpin notifies me to terminate such authorization and appointment, I shall withdraw such authorization and appointment
granted hereby immediately and designate and authorize another individual nominated by Zhilian Wangpin to exercise the full aforesaid rights on my behalf at the shareholders’ meetings of [—].
If I die, I agree that my rights and obligations hereunder shall be immediately succeeded by the person designated by Zhilian Wangpin. 
 During the period
when [—] is validly existing, unless the Business Operation Agreement jointly signed by and between Zhilian Wangpin and [—] is terminated for any
reason whatsoever, this Power of Attorney will remain valid for an initial period of ten (10) years. At the expiry hereof and upon the request of Zhilian Wangpin, I will extend the period of validity hereof as requested by Zhilian Wangpin. This
Power of Attorney shall not be modified or terminated throughout its period of validity unless otherwise agreed by Zhilian Wangpin in writing. 
  

                       
                  
 [—] 
 [—] 

  
 1
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6542 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to submit an annual report 

on investment by any Chinese entity in port infrastructure in the Western 

Hemisphere, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2022 

Mr. FALLON (for himself and Ms. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to submit 

an annual report on investment by any Chinese entity 

in port infrastructure in the Western Hemisphere, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AN4 NUAL REPORT ON INVESTMENT BY ANY CHI5 NESE ENTITY IN COVERED PORT INFRA6 STRUCTURE. 

7 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6542 IH

1 Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with the 

2 Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, shall sub3 mit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

4 that includes the following for the year covered by the re5 port: 

6 (1) An identification of any covered port infra7 structure in which a covered foreign entity has made 

8 or maintained an investment. 

9 (2) An assessment of the capability of any such 

10 foreign entity to leverage for military purposes such 

11 infrastructure, and any implications for the United 

12 States. 

13 (b) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) 

14 shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain 

15 a classified annex. 

16 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT18 TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com19 mittees’’ means— 

20 (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the 

21 Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Perma22 nent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

23 House of Representatives; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6542 IH

1 (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the 

2 Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select 

3 Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

4 (2) COVERED FOREIGN ENTITY.—The term 

5 ‘‘covered foreign entity’’ means— 

6 (A) the Government of the People’s Repub7 lic of China; 

8 (B) any entity partially or wholly owned or 

9 controlled by the Government of the People’s 

10 Republic of China, and any subsidiaries of such 

11 an entity; and 

12 (C) any other entity registered in the Peo13 ple’s Republic of China with substantial ties to 

14 the Government of the People’s Republic of 

15 China. 

16 (3) COVERED PORT INFRASTRUCTURE.—The 

17 term ‘‘covered port infrastructure’’ means the infra18 structure, including any harbor, marine terminal, or 

19 other shoreside facility of any port located in the 

20 Western Hemisphere. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 13, 2015 519890 

________________________________

In the Matter of MATTHEW J.

BAILEY,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: June 8, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Matthew J. Bailey, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent. 

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence

County) to review a determination of respondent which found

petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 519890 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the amended quarterly report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, (the
Report), I, David A. Melman, the Principal Executive Officer and the
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act  of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: /s/ David A. Melman
David A. MelmanPrincipal Executive Officerand Principal Accounting Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: January
8, 2004
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|Subsidiaries                                                 | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------
|HollySys (Asia Pacific) Pte. Limited                         | Singapore                    
|Gifted Time Holdings Limited                                 | British Virgin Islands       
|Clear Mind Limited                                           | British Virgin Islands       
|World Hope Enterprises Limited                               | Hong Kong                    
|Beijing Helitong S&T Exploration Co., Ltd.                   | PRC                          
|Beijing Jin Qiao Xun Tong S&T Exploration Co., Ltd.          | PRC                          
|Beijing HollySys Automation & Drive Co., Ltd.                | PRC                          
|Beijing HollySys Co., Ltd.                                   | PRC                          
|Hangzhou HollySys Automation Co., Ltd.                       | PRC                          
|Beijing Haotong Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. | PRC                          
|                                                             |                              

---
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jody Alexander Ordway

, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 21009B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 33 6

- CR * September 17 , 20 20

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029320
<NAME> INDIANA MUTUAL CREDIT ASSOCIATION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,186
<INVENTORY>                                     68,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,105
<PP&E>                                          87,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Intelligent Buying, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
March 30, 2010





/s/ Eugene MalobrodskyEugene
      MalobrodskyPrincipal
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC. and will be retained by INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-198]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcc8ceddd8d9ddd2ddd0c5cfd5cffcdad1df92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afdbddcecbcacec1cec3d6dcc6dcefc9c2cc81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Agreement No.: 011117-044.
    Title: United States/Australasia Discussion Agreement.
    Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; ANL Singapore PTE LTD.; CMA-CGM, 
S.A.; Compagnie Maritime Marfret S.A.; Hamburg-S[uuml]d; Hapag-Lloyd 
AG; U.S. Lines Limited; and Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics AS.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes Safmarine Container Lines NV as a 
party, removes reference to Hamburg-S[uuml]d's former trade name, and 
clarifies the application of the agreement's authority.

    Agreement No.: 011275-024.
    Title: Australia and New Zealand/United States Discussion 
Agreement.
    Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; ANL Singapore PTE LTD.; Hamburg-
S[uuml]d; and Hapag-Lloyd AG.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes Safmarine Container Lines NV as a 
party to the agreement.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
    Dated: January 4, 2008.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-198 Filed 1-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated February 23, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Cincinnati, Ohio


August 10, 2018
*173*La. 972

#### BOISSEAU v. VALLON *&*JORDANO, Inc., et al.

No. 31144.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1932.

St. Clair Adams and Racivitch & Hicker-son, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Bentley & Dumestre, of New Orleans, for Thomas L. Powell.

Habans & Coleman and A. I. Kleinfeldt, all of New Orleans, for appellee Boisseau.

ROGERS, J.

Plaintiff’s suit is for the recovery of $600 deposited on a real estate contract and for the annulment of the contract, on the ground that it contains a potestative condition. There was judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for, and defendant Vallon & Jordano, Inc., appealed.

Defendant’s application was for a suspen-sive and devolutive appeal to the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans, which was granted. On appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the Court of Appeal was without jurisdiction ratione mate-rite, the case was transferred to this court. Plaintiff has now filed a motion here to dismiss the appeal, alleging that the appeal was dismissed in the district court, because of the insufficiency of the sureties on the appeal bond.

The record discloses that the judge of the district court, in granting defendant’s application for the appeal, ordered defendant to furnish bond according to law for the sus-pensive appeal and for the sum of $50 for the devolutive appeal. In accordance with the order, defendant executed a bond for $2,050 for the suspensive appeal and of $50 for the devolutive appeal. The sureties on the bond are Mr. and Mrs. Albert Vallon, the father and mother of Albert Vallon, Jr., the president of the defendant corporation.

Plaintiff filed a rule in the district court to test the sureties on the appeal bond. On the hearing of this rule, the judge of the district court rendered judgment, decreeing that the sureties in question were “not good sureties,” and ordering, “that, therefore, the suspensive appeal taken * * * to the Court of Appeals be and the same is hereby dismissed.” The sole question before us is the interpretation of this judgment.

Plaintiff contends that the judgment dismissed defendant’s appeal in its entirety. On the other hand, defendant contends that the judgment dismissed its appeal so far as it operated suspensively, but not so far as it operated devolutively.

We think defendant’s interpretation of the judgment under review is correct. The judgment, after decreeing that the sureties on the appeal bonds were “not good sureties,” further decrees “that, therefore,” meaning “for that reason” or “on that ground,” defendant’s sus-pensive appeal is dismissed. No reference whatever is made in the judgment to defendant’s devolutive appeal. Hence, we must conclude that the judge of the district court was satisfied with the sufficiency of the sureties so far as defendant’s devolutive appeal is concerned.

Eor the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal herein is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029305
   <NAME>  Alaska Financial Services Inc.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.4

    Servicer Compliance Statement for GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as
                                    Servicer


                        GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

                          SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

                                   GSAA 2006-5


     I, Michael De  Francesco,  an  authorized  officer of  GreenPoint  Mortgage
Funding, Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

     1.   A review  of the Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  from and
including January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable
portion  thereof)  and  of  the  Servicer's  performance  under  the  applicable
servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

     2.   To the best of my  knowledge, based on such  review, the  Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period.

     Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to
them in the Agreement.

Date:   February 28, 2007

        /s/ Michael De Francesco
        ------------------------------------------
        Michael De Francesco
        Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
#### Frances T. WOODS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 02-3318.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 21, 2002.

*ORDER*

Frances T. Woods moves for reconsideration of the court’s August 29, 2002 order dismissing her petition for review for failure to pay the filing fee, file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination, or file a brief. Woods moves for an extension of time, until October 24, 2002, to file her brief. The motions are unopposed.

The fee has been paid and the Rule 15(c) statement has been received.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion for reconsideration is granted; the mandate is recalled; and the petition is reinstated.

(2) The motion for an extension is granted.