alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frank J. Schmitz, Respondent, *v.*Wyckoff, Church *&*Partridge, Defendant, Impleaded with Valvoline Oil Company, Appellant.

(No. 2.)

First Department,

October 23, 1908.

Motion and order — effect of reversal on collateral orders.

Where a provision requiring the payment of costs has been stricken from an order granting leave to serve a supplemental answer, a further order requiring the service of such answer by a certain date and the payment of costs pursuant to the prior order and foreclosing the right to serve the answer in case of default will be reversed.

Appeal by the defendant, the Valvoline Oil Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of August, 1908, directing the defendant Valvoline Oil Company to serve its supplemental answer on or before August 20,1908, and to pay costs or be foreclosed from an order permitting the service of a supplemental answer.

*Walter H. Griffin*of counsel [Putney, *Twombly & Putney,*attorneys], for the appellant.

*Charles La Rue,*for the respondent.

Clarke, J.:

An order was made permitting service of a supplemental answer on July 23,1908, upon the payment of costs from the beginning of the action. On August eleventh an order to show cause was made returnable on the twelfth of August why an order should not be granted foreclosing the said defendant from accepting the condition which would permit it to serve a supplemental answer herein as permitted by the order of July twenty-third, on the ground of its laches. When this order to show cause was granted, the time to appeal from the order of July twenty-third permitting service of the supplemental answer had not expired and would not expiré until August twenty-second. On the return of said order to show cause, the appellant hied an affidavit that the costs required to be paid under the order of July twenty-third had been taxed and amounted to ninety-eight dollars; that the time to appeal from said *327order had not yet elapsed, and that an appeal would be taken from said order on that day, August twelfth, and the appeal was so taken.

The court, nevertheless, on the seventeenth day of August, entered an order that the appellant, on or before August twentieth, serve upon the attorney for the plaintiff a supplementary answer and pay the ninety-eight dollars costs in accordance with the order entered on July twenty-third, or be foreclosed from accepting conditions of said order permitting service of such answer.

We have reversed that portion of the order of July twenty-third which required the payment of costs from the beginning of the action as a condition for the allowance of service of the supplemental answer in an opinion handed down herewith. *(Schmitz*v. *Wyckoff, Church & Partridge, No. 1,*128 App. Div. 824.)

It follows that the order here appealed from mtist be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.

Patterson, P. J„ Ingraham, Laughlin and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Order, so far as appealed from, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice.
EX-35 (b)
(logo) FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
It's a privilege to serve you

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attention: Servicer Oversight Group

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 2006 fiscal year:


Thornburg 2006-2

     (i) a review of the Correspondent's activities during the immediately
preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its performance
under the Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement during such
period has been made under such officer's supervision, and

     (ii) to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
Correspondent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and any
applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout such
calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to
fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically identifying
each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the status thereof.

Certified By: /s/ Nancy Segreto
Nancy Segreto
Officer

Senior Vice President
Title

Date   February 22,2007



San Francisco  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego  Las Vegas
New York

8310 W. SAHARA AVENUE, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89117, TEL (702) 792-5288 OR
(888) 216-6888, FAX (702) 792-2203

CONVENIENT INTERNET BANKING AT www.firstrepublic.com * NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
SYMBOL: FRC * MEMBER FDIC
Exhibit 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

      Re:   Fremont Home Loan Trust, Series 2006-1
            Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-1

      I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

      l. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period included in the year covered by
this report in Form 10-K of Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-1 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled each of its
obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and

      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

                                        FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                        By: /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Robert McGinnis
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: March 30, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-034
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Opinion issued August 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00731-CV

———————————

DEBORAH HUNT, Appellant

V.

DEMESNE REALTY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 14-CCV-053294

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Deborah Hunt, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to 

file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant 

did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary 
2

dismissal of case). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for 

failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
f8k122713ex10i_dubliinc.htm


 







  





1











  






 







  





2











  






 







  





3











  






 





 


 


4
175 La. 718

#### STATE v. BLACHE. In re BLACHE.

No. 32023.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 31, 1932.

.. Andrew. H. -Thalheim, ,of Gretna, for relator,, , :

■ John E. Fleury, Dist. Atty., arid Ernest M. Conzelmann, Asst. Dist. Atty., both ’ of Gretna,-'fori respondent. ■ *' ■*

ST. Paul, J.

■ Relator was charged' before the district court of Jefferson parish, sitting as a juvenile court,- with failure -to support’ and .provide for his minor child, Albemarle - Blache, Jr., residing in Jefferson parish.

He Challenged the jurisdiction of the court, on the ground-that he himself resided .-and was. domiciled in the parish of Orleans,, and had so resided and. be.en domiciled for some years before the alleged offense was committed.

His plea .was overruled, and in due course he was c.onvictéd;. and he now applies to this, court., for relief,, to wit, for a writ of prohibition forbidding the trial judge to proceed further.

His plea should have been sustained; for “in cases of nonsupport of children, the offense by the father is committed at the place of his own domicile within the state, and not at the place of residence of the child.” State v. Hopkins, 171 La. 919, 132 So. 501, citing, State v. Baurens, 117 La. 136, 41 So. 442; State v. Pick, 140 La. 1063, 74 So. 554; State v. Clark, 144 La. 328, 80 So. 578; State v. Smith, 145 La. 914, 83 So. 189; State v. Morel, 146 La. 6, 83 So. 318.

Decree.

For the reasons assigned, the preliminary writ of prohibition herein issued is now made peremptory, and the' relator is discharged, without prejudice, however, to the right- of the state to proceed further against him before the proper tribunal in the parish of Orleans.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

I n the interest of D.F.M. and * From the 318 th District Court

Z.M.C., children, of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM 58,607

.

No. 11

- 16

- 00085

- CV * July 28 , 2016

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the appeal is dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date:  March 27, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Joshua G. JamesJoshua G. JamesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date:  March 27, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Michael S. HerringMichael S. HerringChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Omniture, Inc. and will be retained by Omniture,
Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2006, and it shall not be considered filed as part of such report
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10095

Summary Calendar

 

SUZETTE ELWONGER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRUCE CROWELL; JOSÉ GOMEZ;

MIKE SCOTT; DEBRA GOMEZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-783-J

- - - - - - - - - -

August 7, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Suzette Elwonger appeals the district court’s order granting

the motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants, Bruce

Crowell and Mike Scott. Elwonger argues that the district court

erred in holding that Crowell was entitled to qualified immunity

for his actions in obtaining and executing an arrest warrant

against her. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court. 
No. 96-10095

- 2 -

Elwonger v. Crowell, No. 3:95-CV-783-J (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationApril Corporation
    
    ColoradoArden Park Ventures, LLC
    
    FloridaBeazer Allied Companies Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Clarksburg, LLC
    
    MarylandBeazer Commercial Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer General Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Capital Trust I
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Corp.
    
    TennesseeBeazer Homes Holdings Corp.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Indiana LLP
    
    IndianaBeazer Homes Indiana Holdings Corp.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Investments, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Michigan, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Sales, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Texas Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Texas, L.P.
    
    DelawareBeazer Mortgage Corporation
    
    DelawareBeazer Realty Corp.
    
    GeorgiaBeazer Realty, Inc.
    
    New JerseyBeazer Realty Los Angeles, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Realty Sacramento, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Realty Services, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer SPE, LLC
    
    GeorgiaBeazer/Squires Realty, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaBH Building Products, LP
    
    DelawareBH Procurement Services, LLC
    
    DelawareDove Barrington Development LLC
    
    DelawareHomebuilders Title Services of Virginia, Inc.
    
    VirginiaHomebuilders Title Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareParagon Title, LLC
    
    IndianaSecurity Title Insurance Company
    
    VermontThe Ridings Development LLC
    
    DelawareTrinity Homes, LLC
    
    IndianaUnited Home Insurance Company, A Risk Retention Group
    
    Vermont
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6275 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to administer a COVID–19 vaccine 

to officers and employees of the U.S. Border Patrol, U.S. Immigration 

and Customs Enforcement, or certain Department of the Interior officers 

and employees or require that such officers and employees receive such 

a vaccine as a condition of employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Ms. MACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committees on Natural Resources, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to administer a 

COVID–19 vaccine to officers and employees of the U.S. 

Border Patrol, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or certain Department of the Interior officers and 

employees or require that such officers and employees 

receive such a vaccine as a condition of employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6275 IH

1 SECTION 1. NO VACCINE MANDATE FOR U.S. BORDER PA2 TROL, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS EN3 FORCEMENT, OR CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF 

4 THE INTERIOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. 

5 No Federal funds may be used to— 

6 (1) administer a COVID–19 vaccine to— 

7 (A) any officer or employee of the U.S. 

8 Border Patrol or the U.S. Immigration and 

9 Customs Enforcement; or 

10 (B) any officer or employee of the Depart11 ment of the Interior or the Drug Enforcement 

12 Agency who is engaged in activities respecting 

13 the construction or maintenance of a border 

14 barrier along the souther border of the United 

15 States; or 

16 (2) require any such officer or employee to re17 ceive such a vaccine as a condition of employment. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Energy Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 7, 2004

/s/ Thomas A. Nardi
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RFMSI SERIES 2006-S4 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
    Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
    Title:    Executive Vice President