alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             798,140
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      883,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                          55,261,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,471,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,388,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,471,309
<SALES>                                            110,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,245,131
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,171,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   484,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,785,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,074,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,074,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,074,001
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         4.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         4.13
        


</TABLE>
**PROMISSORY NOTE**

**                                                                                                           June 30, 2003U.S.$1,000,000.00                                                                            Carlsbad, California**

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned nSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 6190 Corte Del Cedro, Carlsbad, California, 92009 (hereinafter called “Maker”), herebypromises to pay to the order of Cenvill Recreation, Inc., a Florida corporation, with a business address at 100 Century Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida 33417 (hereinafter called “Payee”), at the address of Payee’s principal place of businessstated above, or at such other place as the Payee may designate in writing, the sum of ONE MILLION Dollars (U.S. $1,000,000.00) (the “Principal Amount”), plus interest on the outstanding balance of the Principal Amount at the rate of eight percent (8%)per annum, from the date hereof until the date when said sum is paid in full in accordance with the terms hereof.  The entire Principal Amount plus all accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable in full on December 31, 2003.

It is expressly agreed that this Promissory Note evidences a ONE MILLION Dollars (U.S. $1,000,000.00) revolving line of credit.  The Principal Amount which may be outstanding at any time under such line of credit shallnot exceed ONE MILLION Dollars (U.S. $1,000,000.00).  However, this limitation shall not be deemed to prohibit Payee from advancing any sum, which may, in Payee’s sole and exclusive discretion, be necessary or desirable in order to protect and preserve theeffect and enforceability of this Promissory Note.  Within the limits and subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the Maker may borrow, repay and re-borrow under the revolving line of credit evidenced by this Promissory Note and all shall be subject to theterms and conditions of this Promissory Note.

Upon the failure by Maker to pay interest in full on or before the date when due hereunder, the entire unpaid amount of this Note shall thereupon be immediately due and payable, and the Payee shall have all rights and remediesprovided under this Note.

Maker shall have the right, in Maker’s discretion at any time, without payment of premium or penalty, to repay in whole or in part the unpaid balance of this Note.

This Note shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Florida.  The exclusive venue for any litigation in connection with or arising out of this Note shall be Palm Beach County, Florida, and theMaker hereby consents and submits to the jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting in Palm Beach County, Florida.

MAKER HEREBY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES THE RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION BASED HEREON, OR ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS NOTE.

nSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By: /s/ Thomas L. GruberName: Thomas L. GruberTitle:Acting President, Chief Operating and             Financial Officer
STRATS Trust For Allstate Corporation Securities, Series 2006-3 - 10-K

 

**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Barbara Garafalo, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of STRATS Trust For Allstate Corporation Securities, Series 2006-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.

 

| Dated: March 30, 2020 | By:  | /s/ Barbara Garafalo                                      |
|-----------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |      |      Barbara Garafalo            |
|                  |      |      Vice President              |
|                  |      | (senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization) |
#### CALHOUN v. STATE.

No. 31346.

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division A.

April 29, 1935.

*298C. E. Engle, of Natchez, for appellant.

W. D; Conn, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

COOK, Justice.

Appellant, Lee Calhoun, was indicted and convicted of unlawfully and willfully moving cattle from the state of Louisiana to a point in the state of Mississippi,, called Meringo Island, in violation of the State Livestock Law (Code 1930, § 5412 et seq.), requiring that before cattle may be removed from Louisiana into Mississippi they shall be inspected and found free of ticks, and shall be dipped under the supervision of a bureau inspector, and a federal certificate shall be issued authorizing their movement to a point of destination in Mississippi. Erom a judgment, sentencing the appellant to pay a fine of $50, he has appealed to this court.

In response to a request by the court for additional briefs on certain points presented in his original brief, counsel for the appellant, for the first time, present an argument that the peremptory instruction requested by the appellant should have been granted for the reason that the proof fails to show that no federal certificate- or permit for the removal of the cattle was issued to him.

The proof shows that federal certificates or permits for the removal of cattle from Louisiana to Mississippi must be secured by application to the United States Bureau of Animal Industry, located at Baton Rouge, Lá., and that when such a certificate is issued by that office, it is customary to mail a copy thereof to the office of the said bureau located in the Tower building, Jackson, Miss., or direct to the secretary of the Mississippi live stock board, whose offices are located in the old capitol building, at Jackson, Miss. In the event a copy of such a certificate is received by the office of the Bureau of Animal Industry in Jackson, Miss., it is customary to there prepare a further copy and mail it to the office of the state live stock board.

To meet the burden of showing that no federal certificate or permit for the removal of the cattle in question to Meringo Island was issued, the state offered only the testimony of the secretary of the Mississippi live stock board to the effect that he had examined the records of certificates on file in the office of that board in Jackson, Miss., and had found no copy of a certificate permitting the appellant to move the cattle into Louisiana from Mississippi. The Attorney General has filed no brief in this cause, and we have not been cited to any law or rule or regulation having the effect of law, which requires the United States Board of Animal Industry, of Baton Rouge, La., to file in the office of the Mississippi live stock board copies of permits issued for the removal of cattle into Mississippi. Consequently, the proof upon this point is not aided by any presumption; and we think it was insufficient to warrant the conviction of appellant, and that the peremptory instruction requested by him should have been granted.

The judgment of the court below will therefore be reversed, and the appellant discharged.

Reversed and appellant discharged.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00187-CR

MICHAEL RAY WARD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant=s Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal

And Dismiss Appeal.” The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of 

appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having 

been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 19, 2012
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALEX BRENT PINKARD

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3956

[ July 12, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502017CF005744AXXXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B.

Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, L EVINE and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 30, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0061. CITY OF WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA v. THE MEDICAL CENTER OF CENTRAL GEORGIA, INC..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2013V109659
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0542

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ERIC JOE JAYNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 23 2024

02/23/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0542
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

JENNIFER SEVINANDWEBSTER SEVIN, III, ON BEHALF OF THEIRMINORCHILD, CHANNING SEVIN VERSUS HANNAH BECNEL, THE TOT SPOT EARLY LEARNING CENTER, LLC, ANDWESTERN WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 2023 CW 1248



### FEBRUARY 5, 2024

InRe: Western World Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, ParishofEast BatonRouge, No. 701345.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., CHUTZ, LANIER, MILLERAND GREENE, JJ. WRIT GRANTED. We find the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for leave to file an amended answer filed by the defendant, Western World Insurance Company. Amendments to pleadings shouldbe liberally allowedprovided the movant: 1) is acting in good faith, 2) the amendment is not sought as a delaying tactic, 3) the opponent will not be unduly prejudiced, and 4) trial of the issues will not be unduly delayed. Hogan v. State FarmAutomobile Insurance Company, 94- 0004 (La. App. 1st Cir. 12/22/94), 649 So.2d 45, 50, writ denied, 95-0215 (La. 3/17/95), 651 So.2d 276. Here, there was no evidence that the defendant, WesternWorld Insurance Company, was not acting in good faith, that the amendment was being used as a delaying tactic, that plaintiffs would be unduly prejudiced, or that the trial would be unduly delayed, as there are no pending deadlines and this case has not yet been set for trial. We reverse the trial court's November 3, 2023 judgment and grant the motion for leave to file an amended answer filed bythedefendant, WesternWorld InsuranceCompany. WRC WIL

HG Guidry, C.J., dissents and would deny the writ application. The criteria set forth in Berlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam), arenotmet. Miller, J., would refuse to consider the writ application. The writ application failed to include a copy of the pleadings upon which the ruling was founded, including a copy of the motion at issue and a copy of the July 24, 2023 hearing transcript, in violation of Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-5(C)(8).

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# 11.,,J)

DEPUTY CLERKOF COURT FORTHE COURT
Exhibit 24
 POWER OF
    ATTORNEY  Form 10-K
    Signature

Title/s/  Donald
    G. Barger, Jr.  Donald
    G. Barger, Jr.

Director/s/  Frank
    J. Hansen  Frank
    J. Hansen

Director/s/  Raymond
    R. Hipp  Raymond
    R. Hipp

Director/s/  David
    D. Petratis  David
    D. Petratis

Director/s/  Diane
    K. Schumacher  Diane
    K. Schumacher

Director/s/  Charles
    L. Szews  Charles
    L. Szews

Director/s/  Richard
    L. Thompson  Richard
    L. Thompson

Director
#### Alice M. Sponheimer, as Administratrix, etc., of Adolph Sponheimer, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Back to Contents

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis L. Winger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dennis L. Winger          Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 7, 2005

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Todd Gresham, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of nStor Technologies, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Intentionally omitted.

     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

|                         |
|-------------------------|
| Date: May 13, 2004 |        | By: /s/ Todd Gresham |
|                         |  |  |
|                         |  | Todd Gresham*  Chief Executive Officer* |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                  51,500
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                          153,600
<ALLOWANCES>                            14,500
<INVENTORY>                            199,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       441,100
<PP&E>                                 563,400
<DEPRECIATION>                         338,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         849,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  202,400
<BONDS>                                177,400
<COMMON>                                 3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                             239,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           849,100
<SALES>                                232,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       232,100
<CGS>                                  192,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          192,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        45,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       5,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (11,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                             1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (12,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           (12,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.62)
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6267 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

15 Chestnut Street in Suffern, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Gerald 

T. ‘Jerry’ Donnellan Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. JONES (for himself, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. MENG, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. CAROLYN B. 

MALONEY of New York, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. TORRES of New York, Mr. 

SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. DELGADO, and Mr. JACOBS

of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15 Chestnut Street in Suffern, New York, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Gerald T. ‘Jerry’ Donnellan Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT GERALD T. ‘‘JERRY’’ DONNELLAN 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 15 Chestnut Street in Suffern, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6267 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser2 geant Gerald T. ‘Jerry’ Donnellan Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Gerald T. 

7 ‘Jerry’ Donnellan Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS