alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Duncan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  February 16, 2005                /s/
                                       Ronald A. Duncan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       GCI, Inc.

                                        1
<PAGE>
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Lowber, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  February 16, 2005                /s/
                                       John M. Lowber
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       GCI, Inc.

                                       2
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert L. Parker Jr.Robert L. Parker Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 11

                      SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

                                 QUARTER ENDED      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                  July 31,  August 1, July 31,  August 1,
                                 1999      1998      1999      1998

NET EARNINGS
  Basic net earnings           $  11,415  $  9,020  $ 31,677  $ 24,904
  Add:  Distributions on
   Preferred Securities,
   net of tax                        488         -       793         -

  Diluted net earnings            11,903     9,020    32,470    24,904

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
 OUTSTANDING
  Basic weighted average common
   shares outstanding             27,084    27,102    26,958    26,775
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed conversion of
   Preferred Stock                 1,637         -       887         -
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed exercise of options     1,911     2,001     1,872     1,889

  Diluted weighted average        30,632    29,103    29,717    28,664
   shares outstanding


NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Basic                         $    .42  $    .33  $   1.17  $    .93
  Diluted                       $    .39  $    .31  $   1.09 $    .87
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

PG&E GAS TRANSMISSION, NORTHWEST CORPORATION
SEC FILING - FORM 10-Q - Third Quarter 2000
EXHIBIT 12 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         For the Nine Months Ended
                                                    -------------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>                      <C>
Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges                      2000                     1999
----------------------------------                  -------------            ------------
Earnings
     Net income                                             43.3                    40.8
Adjustments:
     Income taxes                                           27.4                    25.3
     Fixed charges (as below)                               30.6                    32.0
                                                    -------------            ------------
            Total adjusted earnings                        101.3                    98.1
                                                    =============            ============


Fixed charges:
     Net interest expense                                   30.2                    31.1
Adjustments:
     Interest component of rents                             0.0                     0.0
     AFUDC debt                                              0.4                     0.9
                                                    -------------            ------------
            Total fixed charges                             30.6                    32.0
                                                    =============            ============


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           3.3                     3.1
                                                    =============            ============
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-28-1996
<CASH>                                            1155
<SECURITIES>                                      3400
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31239
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1052
<INVENTORY>                                      16474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 63015
<PP&E>                                           88114
<DEPRECIATION>                                   76149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  167714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      11357
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    167714
<SALES>                                          43911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 43911
<CGS>                                            29495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    29495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 11782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1797
<INCOME-TAX>                                       754
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-11083 Conference Calendar

ADRIAN GUTIERREZ MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus EULON ROSS-TAYLOR, Doctor, Medical Director; SCHOCK, Behavioral Assessment Psychologist, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-189-BG

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Adrian Gutierrez-Martinez, Texas prisoner # 562996, appeals the dismissal of his Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) claimfor failure to state a claim. He argues that his predisciplinary mental status exams violated psychiatric policy and therefore caused him to be disciplined for conduct that was a manifestation of his mental illness and for which he should not have been held accountable.No. 02-11083 -2- Gutierrez’s self-styled ADA claim is in fact a thinly veiled challenge to the validity of his disciplinary convictions. Absent proof that his disciplinary convictions have been overturned or otherwise declared invalid, Gutierrez cannot bring a civil action seeking damages based on a finding of guilt on his disciplinary charges, because success on his civil claim would necessarily imply the invalidity of his disciplinary convictions. Clarke v. Stalder , 154 F.3d 186, 189 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc). He has therefore failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Gutierrez’s appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), in addition to the strike for the district court’s dismissal.
See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Gutierrez has also had a second civil rights suit dismissed as frivolous. See Gutierrez Martinez v. Leher , No. 02-10491 (5th Cir. Sept. 17, 2002) (unpublished). He is BARRED from bringing any civil action or appeal in forma pauperis while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he shows that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES BAR IMPOSED.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6427 

AN ACT 

To amend the Red River National Wildlife Refuge Act to 

modify the boundary of the Red River National Wildlife 

Refuge, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6427 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red River National 

3 Wildlife Refuge Boundary Modification Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RED RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE BOUND5 ARY MODIFICATION. 

6 Section 3(a)(1) of the Red River National Wildlife 

7 Refuge Act (Public Law 106–300; 114 Stat. 1055) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘map entitled ‘Red River National 

9 Wildlife Refuge—Selection Area’, dated September 5, 

10 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘map entitled ‘Red River National 

11 Wildlife Refuge Acquisition Boundary’ and dated March 

12 21, 2022’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6427 

AN ACT 

To amend the Red River National Wildlife Refuge 

tional Wildlife Refuge, and for other purposes. Act to modify the boundary of the Red River Na-
EXHIBIT 31(a)

I, Thomas M. Patrick, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples Energy Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 7, 2004

/s/ Thomas M. Patrick
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135777) pertaining to the Houston Wire & Cable Company 2000 Stock Plan and the Houston Wire & Cable Company 2006 Stock Plan of our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Houston Wire & Cable Company, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Houston Wire & Cable Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/Ernst & Young LLP





Houston, Texas


March 15, 2011
#### Ike LA HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4464.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1934.

Hardin & Coleman, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Pegues & Pegues, of Mansfield, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case of case No. 4458 on the docket of this court, 156 So. 366, decided this day.

For the reasons assigned in case No. 4458, the judgment of the lower court in this case is reversed, and the demands of plaintiff are rejected, at his cost in both courts.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John D. Erickson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ John D. EricksonJohn D. EricksonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM
THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET, AND CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,227
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        108
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             890
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           621
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,958
<COMMON>                                         1,117
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                297
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,166
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 193
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       24
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,131
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,958
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,787
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               122
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,450
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            353
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  16
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            76
<NET-INCOME>                                       155
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          6
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      149
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            88
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.80


        

</TABLE>
#### Joel W. COFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark SARGENT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1654.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 4, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Joel W. Cofield, Appellant Pro Se. Dawna Marie Cobb, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Joel W. Cofield appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Cofield v. Sargent,*No. CA-02-1599-WMN (D.Md. May 10, 2002). Cofield’s motion to recuse the Maryland Attorney General’s Office from representing the Appellee is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

s1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145852

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145852

COA: 300775

Saginaw CC: 09-033077-FC

JASON THOMAS TARVER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D. C.  20549



FORM 10-Q


Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the Quarter Ended June 30, 1997  Commission File No. 1-5591


                  PENNZOIL COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


             Delaware                          74-1597290
(State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)           Identification No.)


Pennzoil Place, P.O. Box 2967
Houston, Texas 77252-2967
(Address of principal executive offices)




EXHIBIT


<PAGE>





                        PENNZOIL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                 INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.
-----------


         12    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the six
               months ended June 30, 1997 and 1996.

         27    Financial Data Schedule


<PAGE>
Exhibit 15





August 11, 1997



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that Phelps Dodge  Corporation  has  incorporated  by reference our
report dated July 10, 1997 (issued  pursuant to the  provisions  of Statement on
Auditing  Standards  No.  71)  in  the  Prospectus   constituting  part  of  its
Registration  Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-44380) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442,
33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144,  33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362,  33-62648).
We are also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.


Yours very truly,



Price Waterhouse LLP
Phoenix, Arizona