U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 A tale of two laws revisited: Investigating the impact of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and the antiterrorism and effective death penalty
NCJ Number
              306000

Date Published

2004
Length
              103 pages
Annotation
              This report presents research results from an investigation of the effectiveness of two policies aimed at regulating the use of the legal system by state prisoners: the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
Abstract
              This report addresses the ongoing national debate on important criminal justice issues and policies by providing the results of an analysis into the effectiveness of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) to decrease federal habeas corpus petitions, and the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) which allows prisoners to challenge the conditions of their confinement, these cases are commonly referred to as Section 1983 cases. The AEDPA focused on applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by prisoners challenging the validity of their convictions and sentences, known as habeas corpus petitions. The authors provide a deep analysis of the research and findings of their investigation into AEDPA and the PLRA, and suggest that there are five overarching lessons that emerge from what happened to prisoner litigation after the passage of the two Acts: first, intrinsic difference between a lawsuit and an application for a writ put Congress in a much better position to influence Section 1983 cases than habeas corpus petitions; second, the new exhaustion requirements incorporated in the PLRA and the pre-existing exhaustion doctrine governing Federal habeas corpus are not equivalent; third, the nature of prisoner population plays a role in inhibiting the efforts to reduce the number of habeas corpus petitions but no similar role in reducing Section 1983 cases; fourth, the success of PLRA and AEDPA cannot be judged by examination of only the number of prisoners’ cases that are filed; and fifth, U.S. Congress should be able to improve its policy initiatives in the area of prisoner litigation in the future.
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2001-IJ-CX-0013


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Study/Research)


  
  
        
  Award
        A Tale of Two Laws Revisited: Investigating the Impact of Prisoner Litigation Reform
    
  
  
Date Published: January 1, 2004
    
          Downloads
        
                      PDF

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Death penalty
        Lawsuits
        Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
        Habeas Corpus
        Legal System



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Looking Beyond the Sentence: Research Summary
                  Criminalizing White-Collar Misconduct: Determinants of Prosecution in Savings and Loan Fraud Cases
                  Later Stages of Ordinary Property Offender Careers
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov