Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50875 Su m m ar yC al endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. RO S A ANNAT RI NI DA D , D e fe nda nt

- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- C R

- 256- 1

B ef ore K IN G , B A R K S D A L E , an d G A R Z A , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * R osa A n n a T ri n i d a d ch a l l en ge s h er se n ten ce of 24 -m on th s’i m p ri son m en t, i m pos ed upon r evo c at i on o f herpr obat i on . O ur c our thas dec l i ned t o r es olve
w het her , f

ol l ow i ng Uni t e d St at e s v . Booker , 543 U

. S. 2 20 ( 20 05 ) , t he
reasona bl en ess st an da rd of revi ew ap pl i es t o revocat i on sentences; w e need not United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 8, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 09-50875 Document: 00511135638 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2010N o. 09- 50875

2 d o s o h e r e , b e c a u s e , a s T r in id a dco n c e d e s , o n lyp la in -e r r o rr e v i e w a p p lie s . S ee Uni t e d St at e s v . W

hi t e law , 5 8 0 F .3 d2 5 6 , 2 6 0 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ). T o est abli sh reversibl e pl ai n err or, T ri n i da d m u stshow the di st ri ctcourt
com m i t t ed a cl ear or obvious er ror t h at af fect ed h e r sub st an t i alri gh t s; even t h en , w e h ave di scr et i on w h et h er t o cor rectsuch error an d, gen eral l y, w i l ldo so onl y i f i tser i ous l y af

fec t s t he fai r nes s, i nt egr i t y, orpubl i c r eput at i on o f j udi c i al p r o c e e d in g s . E

. g. , Uni t e d St at e s v. B ak er , 5 3 8 F .3d 3 2 4 , 3 3 2 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 8 ),
cer t
. den i ed , 1 2 9 S

. C t. 9 6 2 (20 0 9 ). T ri n i da d contend s t h e di st ri ctcourtpl ai n l y erred i n f i n di n g she conti n u ed t o us e dr ugs and posed a dange rt o he r se l f and ot her s i n t he c om m uni t y. H ad Tri ni dad obj ec t ed t i m ely t o t hes e f i n d i n gs , t he di st r i c tc our tc oul d have ascert ai n ed p ert i n en tfact s. I n t h at reg a rd , qu est i on s of factcapab l e of resol u t i on by the di st ri ctcourtup on proper obj ect i on at sentenci n g can nev er constit u t e pl ai n err or. Un i t ed Stat es v . L opez , 9 2 3 F .2d 4 7 , 5 0 (5t h C ir. 1 9 9 1 ). In t h e l i gh t of t h e f

oregoi n g, T ri n i da d has n ot est abli shed cl ear or obvious er ror. S ee B ak er , 5 3 8 F .3 da t 3 3 2 ; L opez , 923 F. 2d at50. T r in id a da ls o co n te n d s th e co u r t p la in lye r r e din im p o s in gas u b s ta n tiv e ly
unreas onabl e s ent enc e. She m ai nt ai ns t hatt he above- G ui del i nes sent enc e o f 24
m on t h s’i m pri sonm en tw as un reasona bl e becau se i t overst ated t h e ser i ou sness o f herbe hav i o r . She as s e r t s t hathervi o l at i o ns of he rpr o ba t i o n t e r m s (fail i ng t o reportt o her proba t i on of f i cer an d fai l i n g to s u b m it u ri n e speci m en s) w ere
m in o rin fr a c tio n s . A l t h ou gh T ri n i da d’ s 24- m on t h sentence w as i n e x ce ss of t h e G u i del i n es ran g e of

t h ree t o ni n e m on t h s’i m pri sonm en t , i tw as w i t h i n t h e st atutor y
m a x im u m . S ee1 8 U

. S. C. § § 4 , 3 56 5. Ourc o ur tha s r o ut i ne l y uphe l d p r o ba t i o nr e v o c a tio n s e n te n c e s th a t, a s h e r e , e x c e e d th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e b u t a r e w ith in th e s ta tu to r ym a x im u m . W hi t e law , 5 8 0 F

. 3 d a t 2 6 5
. T r i n i d a dh a s n o ts ho wn p la in e r r o ra s to th is is s u e . S ee B ak er , 538 F. 3d at332. Case: 09-50875 Document: 00511135638 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2010N o. 09- 50875

3 Fi nal l y, Tr i ni da d, no t w i t hs t and i ng he ra bo ve - de s c r ibe d c o nc e s s i o n a bo ut pl ai n - errorre vi e w , c o nt e nds : s uc h r e vi e w s ho ul d no ta pply be c aus e s he
r e q u e s te dalo w e rs e n te n c e in t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t; a n d , b e c a u s e re a s o n a b le n e s s is an appel l at e s t andard, no o bj ec t i on to e i therpr oc edur alors ubst ant ive
r e a s o n a b le n e s s n e e db e m a d e to p r e s e r v e e r r o r . S h e a c k n o w le d g e s th is is s u e is fo r e c lo s e db yo u rp r e c e d e n t b u t r a is e s it fo rp o s s ib le fu r th e rre v ie w . A F F IR M E D

. Case: 09-50875 Document: 00511135638 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/08/2010