alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Arotech  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2003 filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I,  Avihai  Shen,  Vice
President - Finance and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                               By: /s/ Avihai Shen
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Avihai Shen, Vice President - Finance and CFO
                                   (Chief Financial Officer)

Date:  March 30, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto SOLORENZO-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-40062.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Roberto Solorenzo-Torres appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) by being found in the United States, without permission, following his conviction for an aggravated felony and subsequent deportation.

For the first time on appeal, SolorenzoTorres argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing factor and not as an element of the offense. He asks us to vacate his conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for resentencing.

In *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. *Id.*at 239-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219. Solorenzo-Torres acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres,*but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review.

*Apprendi*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi*530 U.S. at 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348; *United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“unless and until the Supreme Court itself *411determines to overrule it.” *Dabeit,*231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Mary McCown v. State.

No. 24660.

November 23, 1949.

*No*attorney for appellant on appeal of record.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted for murder with malice aforethought of Bennie McCown. The case was submitted to a jury which found her guilty of murder without malice, and assessed her punishment at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

However, we observe that in pronouncing sentence upon appellant the court, evidently through oversight, omitted to give her the benefit of the indeterminate sentence, and sentenced her for five years. The sentence is corrected to provide that she serve not less than two nor more than five years in the penitentiary.

As thus amended, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.
and John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended January 3, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, Paul E. Muellner, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Annual Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operation of John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P. and
                  John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III.



                                     /s/ Paul E. Muellner
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Paul E. Muellner, Chief Financial Officer
                                    John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation
                                    and John Q. Hammons, Inc., general partner
                                    of John Q. Hammons Hotels L.P.

April 1, 2003



                                       53
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended July 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,J. Hicks Lanier, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, K.Scott Grassmyer, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controllerof the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 
| (1)  | The  Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2)  | The  information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| /s/ J. Hicks Lanier                                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J.  Hicks Lanier                                               |   |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer                          |   |
| September 2,  2010                                        |   |
|                                                           |   |
|                                                           |   |
| /s/ K. Scott Grassmyer                                         |   |
| K.  Scott Grassmyer                                            |   |
| Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller |   |
| September 2,  2010                                        |   |

 

----
#### Cornelius Roberson, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Leak, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 51,359.

First District, Fourth Division.

June 10, 1966.

Ernest A. Greene, of Chicago, for appellant.

Block & Levy, of Chicago, for appellee.

MR. JUSTICE ENGLISH

delivered the opinion of the court.

*12Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,500. Defendant seeks review of that judgment.

Plaintiff has moved to dismiss this appeal because:

(1) Defendant filed no post-trial motion and the time for filing such a motion has expired.

(2) Section 68.1(2) of the Civil Practice Act provides that relief desired after trial must be by post-trial motion containing “the points relied upon, particularly specifying the grounds in support thereof,” and an appellant may not urge in the reviewing court any point not thus particularly specified in a post-trial motion. Ill Rev Stats (1965), c 110, § 68.1(2).

(3) It appears from defendant’s Notice of Appeal that the only review sought is of error alleged to have occurred during the course of the trial.

(4) Therefore, nothing has been preserved which could properly constitute a basis for review by this court.

We believe the point raised by plaintiff’s motion is valid, but consider that the appropriate action for this court to take, under the circumstances, is to affirm the judgment of the trial court, rather than to dismiss the appeal. Johnson Ford Co., Inc. v. Lewan, 71 Ill App2d 420, 218 NE2d 893.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

DRUCKER, P. J. and McCORMICK, J., concur.
## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 30th day of July, 2014, the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

DAVENPORT MEADOWS, LP, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 01471

- CV V.

JACOB DOBRUSHKIN & GALINA DOBRUSHKIN, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law
No. 6, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 02710

- 2011. Opinion delivered by Justice O'Neill. Justices Myers and Brown participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee s JACOB DOBRUSHKIN & GALINA DOBRUSHKIN recover their costs of this appeal from appellant DAVENPORT MEADOWS, LP.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 25th day of February, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999 and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      447,664
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    101,299
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         106,052
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         8,427
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,442
<COMMON>                                        59,621
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       41,406
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            129,503
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 230,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,000
<PREFERRED>                                     20,831
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           181,326
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    9,731
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 203,024
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  663,442
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      222,897
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             9,222
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     191,345
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     200,567
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         22,330
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,412
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  23,742
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,347
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,395
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,179
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   15,216
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        11,786
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        7,139
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          37,175
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28


</TABLE>
#### HYMAN v. SALZER PLUMBING CO., Inc.

No. 13780.

Court of Appeal, of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 30, 1931.

Eor former opinion, see 135 So. 703.

Hugh M. Wilkinson and Harry Nowalsky, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Lazarus, Weil & Lazarus and Herman S. Lindy, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, J.

Upon reconsideration, we have reached the conclusion that the amount heretofore approved by us was excessive.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that, our former decree be amended by reducing the amount awarded plaintiff from $2,459.25 to $1,959.25, and, as thus amended, it is reinstated.

Original decree amended and reinstated.
Form of Executive Agreement for certain executive officers



 Exhibit 10.1 

Schedule Identifying Material Details of 

Executive Agreements Substantially Similar to Exhibit 10.3 to Huntington’s 

Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2012 
  

			
	 Name
	  	 Effective Date

		
	David S. Anderson	  	June 20, 2013
	Richard A. Cheap	  	November 28, 2012
	James E. Dunlap	  	November 28, 2012
	Paul G. Heller	  	November 28, 2012
	Helga S. Houston	  	November 28, 2012
	Howell D. McCullough III	  	April 9, 2014
	Mary W. Navarro	  	November 28, 2012
	Daniel J. Neumeyer	  	November 28, 2012
	Richard Remiker	  	January 15, 2014
	Keith D. Sanders	  	November 28, 2012
	Nicholas G. Stanutz	  	November 28, 2012
	Mark E. Thompson	  	November 28, 2012

 Schedule Identifying Material Details of 

Executive Agreements Substantially Similar to Exhibit 10.2 to Huntington’s 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended June 30, 2013. 

 

			
	 Name
	  	 Effective Date

		
	Barbara H. Benham	  	July 16, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0512

RICHARD E. SHREVES,

Petitioner and Appellant. 

vs.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and INDUSTRY,

CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE REVIEW TEAM,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PAUL REES,

Respondents and Appellees.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), Appellees are

given an extension of time until June 7, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve their

answer briefs.

AS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 19 2024

04/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0512
EXHIBIT
23.2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS








As
independent petroleum engineers, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
hereby consents to the inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-149190), the registration
statement (No. 333-159888) on Form S-3, the registration statement (No.
333-153579) on Form S-3/A and the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of BreitBurn
Energy Partners L.P. of information from our firm’s reserve report dated January
28, 2010, entitled Estimates
of Reserves and Future Revenue to the BreitBurn Operating L.P. Interest in
Certain Oil and Gas Properties located in California, Florida and Wyoming as of
December 31, 2009 and all references to our firm included in or made part
of the BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.














NETHERLAND,
SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.





By:/s/ J. Carter Henson,
Jr.





J. Carter
Henson, Jr., P.E.


Senior
Vice President


Houston,
Texas


March 11,
2010
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.25


IDACORP, Inc. and/or Idaho Power Company Executive Officers
with Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreements
(as of February 20, 2020)


	
					
	Name
	 
	Title
	 
	Date of Agreement

	Ryan Adelman*
	 
	Vice President, Transmission & Distribution Engineering and Construction of Idaho Power Company
	 
	10/5/2019

	Darrel T. Anderson
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/23/2008

	Brian R. Buckham*
	 
	Senior Vice President and General Counsel of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	4/4/2016

	Sarah E. Griffin*
	 
	Vice President, Human Resources of Idaho Power Company
	 
	10/5/2019

	Lisa A. Grow
	 
	President of Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/12/2008

	James Bo D. Hanchey*
	 
	Vice President, Customer Operations and Chief Safety Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	10/5/2019

	Steven R. Keen
	 
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/30/2008

	Jeffrey L. Malmen
	 
	Senior Vice President of Public Affairs of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/8/2008

	Tessia Park*
	 
	Vice President of Power Supply of Idaho Power Company
	 
	1/5/2016

	Kenneth W. Petersen*
	 
	Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	5/20/2010

	Adam Richins*
	 
	Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	2/8/2017




*Change in control agreement does not include 13th-month trigger or tax gross-up provisions.






{00268071.DOCX; 1}
Exhibit 10.(b)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-112892) of our report dated March 25, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-112892) of our report dated April 22, 2014, relating to the financial statements of Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.

 

 

	
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Birmingham, Alabama
    	
 
    
	
April 29, 2014
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00176-CV 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

CHRISTINA LYNN FLETCHER AND ROBERT HUGH FLETCHER 

 

On Appeal from the 237th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2014-510,128, Honorable Leslie Hatch, Presiding 

 

July 13, 2015 

 

ORDER 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

On July 9, 2015, appellant, Robert Hugh Fletcher, filed with this Court an 

Emergency Motion to Suspend Enforcement of the Decree of Divorce Pending Appeal. 

By this motion, Robert “seeks a stay of all enforcement actions transferring any real 

property in this case until this Court has decided his appeal.” According to Rule 

24.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, when the judgment is for the 

recovery of an interest in real or personal property, the trial court will determine the type 

and amount of security. TEX. R. APP. P. 24.2(a)(2). As such, we now abate this appeal 
2

and remand the cause1to the trial court for further proceedings as necessary to set the 

appropriate type and amount of security required under Rule 24.2(a)(2). 

Upon remand, the trial court shall enter an order setting the type and amount of

security that Robert must post to suspend enforcement of the trial court’s divorce 

decree while the appeal remains pending before this Court. See id. The trial court shall 

cause a supplemental clerk’s record to be developed containing its order setting bond, 

deposit, or security, as well as any other orders issued relating to this matter. The trial 

court shall then ensure that this supplemental clerk’s record be filed with the Clerk of

this Court on or before August 12, 2015.

If it is necessary to hold a hearing to determine this issue, the trial court shall 

immediately cause notice of the hearing to be given and shall conduct the hearing as 

soon as practicable. If a hearing is held, the trial court shall cause the hearing to be 

transcribed and cause a reporter’s record to be developed containing the transcription 

of any evidence and arguments presented at the hearing. The trial court shall then file 

any supplemental reporter’s record with the Clerk of this Court on or before August 12, 

2015. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

 

1 While we are aware that the trial court has continuing jurisdiction to order the amount and type 

of security even after its plenary power has expired, see TEX. R. APP. P. 24.3(a), we abate and remand 

this cause in case the trial court needs to take evidence regarding the “value of the property interest’s rent 

or revenue. . . .” TEX. R. APP. P. 24.2(a)(2)(A).
Exhibit 10(b)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-179649) of our report dated March 25, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-179649) of our report dated April 22, 2014, relating to the financial statements of Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.

 

 

	
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    
	
 
    
	
Birmingham, Alabama
    
	
April 29, 2014
EXHIBIT 99.02
                                  -------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradigm Medical Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Heber C. Maughan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.


/s/  Heber C. Maughan
---------------------
Heber C. Maughan
Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2003