alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (11)
                                                            
               OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              
              COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<S>                                          <C>     <C>
                              
                                              Quarter Ended
                                                 March 31,
                                              1997      1996
                                          (In millions of dollars
                                             except share data)
Primary:

Net income                                $     42    $    39

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (thousands)                   52,761     51,490

Weighted average common equivalent
  shares (thousands):
  Deferred awards                               15         15
  Stock options using weighted average
     market price                              689        796

Primary weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding and
  common equivalent shares (thousands)      53,465     52,301

Primary per share amount                    $  .79    $   .75

Fully Diluted:

Net income                                  $   44    $    41

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (thousands)                   52,761     51,490
Weighted average common equivalent
  shares (thousands):
  Deferred awards                               15         15
  Stock options using the higher of
     average market price or market
     price at end of period                    760        821
  Shares from assumed conversion
     of preferred securities                 4,566      4,566

Fully diluted weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding and
  common equivalent shares (thousands)      58,102     56,892

Fully diluted per share amount             $   .76    $   .73


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                SONIC SOLUTIONS

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                   Years Ended March 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                     Year Ended March 31,
                                                     --------------------
                                                   1995      1996      1997
                                                   ----      -----     -----
<S>                                              <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)......................           $2,534   (3,557)   (5,191)
                                                  ------   ------    ------ 
Weighted average number of                                                  
 common shares outstanding.............            7,351    7,447     7,542 
Number of common stock                                                      
 equivalents as a result of stock                                           
 options outstanding using the                                              
 treasury stock method.................              375       --        -- 
            Total......................           $7,726    7,447     7,542 
                                                  ------   ------    ------ 
Primary and fully diluted net income                                        
 per share.............................           $ 0.33    (0.48)    (0.69)
                                                  ------   ------    ------ 
 </TABLE>

                                      58
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:   May 14, 2007

By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    -----------------------------------
    Robert A. Levinson
    Chief Executive Officer




                                    Page 46
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE M ANUEL C ARR

A SC OESC OB AR , Pe t i tione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 15-71015 Age n c y No. A205-526-495 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 25, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, SILVER M AN, a n d GR AB ER , C i rc uit Judge s. Jose M anue l C arra sc o-Esc oba r, a nat ive and c i tiz e n

of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion pre te rm itting his a pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w de novo



# FIL ED N OV 03 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).que stions of la w a nd c la im s of due proc e ss viola t ions. Mohamme d v . Gonzale s , 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismi ss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The a ge n c y

did not e rr or viola

te due proc e ss by

pre te rm itting C arra sc oEsc oba r’ s a pplic a tion for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l, whe re he la c ke d a ny qua lify ing re lative s at the tim e of his fina l re m ova l he aring. Se e 8 U.S.C . §§ 1229b(b)(1)(D), 1101(b)(1); Lata v . IN

S, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (pe titione r m ust show e rror and pre

judic e to e sta

b lish a due proc e ss viola

tion); De Me rc ado v . Muk ase y , 566 F.3d 810, 816 n.5 (9th C i r. 2009) (“ [N] o a uthority . . . sugge st[s] tha

t the C onstitution provide s . . . a funda m e nta l right to re side in the Unite d State s sim ply be c a use othe r [fa m ily

m e m be rs] are c itiz e ns or la

wful pe rm ane n t re side nts.” ). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r C arra sc o-Esc oba r’ s une xha

uste d c onte ntion re ga rding the pre se rvation of his son’ s sta tus a s a qua lify i ng re lative . Se e Tijani v . Holde r , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th C ir. 2010) (the c ourt la c ks jurisdic tion to c onside r le ga l c la im s not pre se nte d in a n a lie n’ s a dm i nistra

tive proc e e dings be fore the a ge nc y ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t .

1 5 - 7 1 0 1 5 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,083
<SECURITIES>                                    14,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                       957
<INVENTORY>                                     25,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,754
<PP&E>                                         108,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,561
<BONDS>                                         33,014
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,783
<SALES>                                        137,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,876
<CGS>                                           91,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,179
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7073

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

EDWIN ARNOLDO REYES, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:01-cr-0533-PJM-20; 8:09-cv-1224-PJM) 

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Edwin Arnoldo Reyes, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Edwin Arnoldo Reyes seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reyes has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 1, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00784-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.F., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-18505 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

This appeal from the trial court’s May 25, 2023 order modifying the parentchild relationship was filed on August 10, 2023. Because the record reflected no 

post-judgment motion or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law was 

timely filed, it appeared the appeal was a restricted appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 30. 

The notice of appeal, however, did not comply with the requirements for a notice of 

restricted appeal. See id. 25.1(d)(7). Accordingly, we directed appellant to file, no 

later than October 23, 2023, an amended notice of appeal that complied with the 

requirements. Although we cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result 
 –2– 

in dismissal of the appeal without further notice, appellant has not responded to date. 

See id. 42.3(a), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 

230784F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.F., A 

CHILD 

No. 05-23-00784-CV 

 On Appeal from the 256th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-18505. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and 

Goldstein participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee JA’MARLON FOSTER recover his costs of 

this appeal from appellant ERICA MALONE. 

Judgment entered November 1, 2023
RCPC-2014.3.31-EX4.4




Schedule I


	
		
	Acquisition Lender
	Acquisition Term Loan Commitment

	Citibank, N.A.
	$350,000,000

	JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
	$70,000,000

	Bank of America, N.A.
	$70,000,000

	Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
	$70,000,000

	Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
	$70,000,000

	Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch
	$70,000,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          4,749
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          5,721
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          9,435
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            9,516
<LOANS>                                        73,490
<ALLOWANCE>                                       375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 97,585
<DEPOSITS>                                     62,003
<SHORT-TERM>                                    8,148
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               606
<LONG-TERM>                                    14,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,033
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 97,585
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 6,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 824
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                7,781
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,809
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,052
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           3,729
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     376
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,624
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,133
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,133
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.50
<LOANS-NON>                                       229
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    9
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   238
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     499
<RECOVERIES>                                       14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 375
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(a) - Manager Compensation Arrangements






Exhibit 10(a)


Manager Compensation Arrangements


Managers who are current or former officers of Energy Future Holdings Corp. or any of its subsidiaries or employed by the Sponsor Group do not receive any fees for their service as managers.  Mr. Sawyer receives $200,000 annually.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2000, and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      447,807
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    137,795
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         127,959
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         8,040
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 721,601
<COMMON>                                       119,250
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (226)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            137,019
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 256,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,000
<PREFERRED>                                     15,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           187,251
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              15,562
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    8,287
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 220,958
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  721,601
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      412,118
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,571
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     355,424
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     370,995
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         41,123
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,565
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  42,688
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,509
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,179
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,409
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   28,770
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        18,245
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       12,257
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          36,085
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3


		
			Exhibit 10.3
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			TO THE
		

		
			 
		

		
			SYSCO CORPORATION MIP RETIREMENT PROGRAM
		

		
			 
		

		
			Pursuant to the authority granted the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Sysco Corporation (the "Compensation Committee") under Section 10.1 of the Sysco Corporation MIP Retirement Program (the "MIPRP"), effective June 29, 2013, the Compensation Committee hereby amends the MIPRP as follows:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			The first sentence of Section 4.5 of the MIPRP is hereby amended with the addition of the following clause as the conclusion of that sentence:




		
			"; provided that, any election by a married Participant of a form of payment other than the Joint and Survivor Annuity shall be ineffective unless the Participant's  spouse has indicated consent by completing and signing the applicable spousal consent section of the payment election form that may be prescribed by the Administrative Committee."
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			The third sentence of Section 6.4 of the MIPRP is hereby amended to read in its entirety as:




		
			"The amount of such hypothetical retirement benefit shall equal the Participant's Vested Accrued Benefit as of his Retirement or Vested Separation date, reduced, for the period by which the first payment of the death benefit  precedes  the  Participant's   Normal  Retirement  Date,  by 5/9ths of one percent (1%) for each of the first sixty (60) calendar months, 5/18ths  of  one  percent (1%)  for  each  of  the next  sixty  (60)  calendar months and actuarially thereafter (using the assumptions for Actuarial Equivalence), adjusted, as applicable, to take into account the form of payment of such Participant's Retirement Benefit under Section 4.5 of this Program, without regard to the Participant's  election, if any, pursuant to Section 4.5."
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment 2014-1 to the MIPRP has been executed as of this 20th day of February, 2014.
		

		
			SYSCO CORPORATION
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By: /s/ Russell Libby                                             

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						           Russell Libby, General Counsel