U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Strengthening the Evaluation and Interpretation of Glass Evidence Using Statistical Analysis of Collection Sets and Databases of Refractive Index and Elemental Data
NCJ Number
              254339

Author(s)
          Jose Almirall
Date Published

May 2019
Length
              15 pages
Annotation
              This is the Final Report on the findings and methodology of a research project with the goal of improving the value of glass-evidence analysis by developing objective and quantitative interpretation guidelines for the evaluation and reporting of glass-evidence analysis results.
Abstract
              The project first focused on the development of a reporting scheme based on previously reported likelihood ratio calculation by Aitken and Lucy, in conjunction with a "calibration" step previously reported by Ramos. The goal of this first part of the project was to develop a database derived from the analysis of glass using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Typically, a match criterion is used to compare the known and questioned sample; however, match criteria have several disadvantages that can be overcome with an alternative approach. This approach is the likelihood ratio (LR). Two LA-ICP-MS glass databases were used to evaluate the performance of the LR. These were a vehicle windshield database (420 samples) and a casework database (385 samples). Compared to the match criterion, the LR achieved improved false exclusion rates and produced similar false inclusion rates. In addition, the LR limited the magnitude of the misleading evidence, providing only weak support for the incorrect proposition. The LR was also tested in a series of three inter-laboratory studies. Good correct association rates (94-100 percent) were obtained for same-source samples for all three inter-laboratory exercises. All different-source samples were correctly excluded with the LR. 3 tables, 1 figure, and 52 references
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2015-DN-BX-K049


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Research (Applied/Empirical)
                                Report (Study/Research)
                                Report (Grant Sponsored)
                                Program/Project Description


  
  
        
  Award
        Strengthening the evaluation and interpretation of glass evidence using statistical analysis of collection sets and databases of refractive index and elemental data (uXRF, ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS)
    
  
  
Date Published: May 1, 2019
    
          Downloads
        
                      PDF

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Comparative Analysis
        Crime Scene
        Databases
        Forensic laboratories
        Forensic sciences



  
Similar Publications
        
                      The Over-citation of Daubert in Forensic Anthropology
                  Technical Note – Direct Analysis In Real Time Mass Spectrometry (DART-MS)
                  What Medical Examiner’s And Coroner’s Offices Should Know About Molecular Autopsy
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov