alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Everett L. Hodges, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer of Petrominerals Corporation, certifies that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Petrominerals
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in intern

<PAGE>

                              Exhibit 99.1, page 2


controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:
-----
11/14/03         /s/ Everett L. Hodges
                 --------------------------
                 Everett L. Hodges
                 President, CEO & Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

April 16, 2013 
 Glenn
Lunde 
 4923 Hampton road 
 LA CANADA, CA 91011 

Glenn, I am delighted to offer you employment with Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. in the role of Chief Concept Officer reporting to me.
We’ve built a great team, a great business and with the addition of you I am confident in our future success. 
 We are prepared to offer you: 

 

	 	•	 	A base salary of $340,000 

  

	 	•	 	Target bonus at 75% of base salary. 

  

	 	•	 	You will be eligible for our Long Term Incentive Plan with an initial inducement grant of 10,000 Restricted Share Units and 50,000 Stock Options. Long term Incentive awards are subject to the terms and
conditions of the respective plans and Board approval. 

 In exchange for the aforementioned Long Term Incentive award you agree that upon
termination from or separation of employment with Einstein at any time and for any reason you will not serve in a marketing, marketing related or general management capacity with any of our direct competitors for 12 months after termination or
separation. For further detail see attached Confidentiality Agreement. 
 The company will cover the cost of real estate commissions on the sale of
your home and provide a relocation reimbursement up to $50,000 for reasonable and customary moving expenses over and above real estate commissions. All relocation expenses are to be pre-approved by the Executive Vice President Human
Resources. If for any reason you decide to voluntarily terminate your employment with ENRGI within 12 months of your date of hire you will be required to pay back 100% of your relocation reimbursements. 

As a regular, full-time employee of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., you will be eligible for the following; 

 

	 	•	 	Medical and Dental coverage on the first of the month following your 31st day of employment. 


 

	 	•	 	Benefit cost subsidy during benefit plan eligibility waiting period. 

  

	 	•	 	401k savings plan on the first day of a quarter following your 6th month of employment. 


 

	 	•	 	Paid time off, you will accrue a total of twenty two days per year based on a calendar year. 

 Your
expected start date is to be mutually agreed upon by the parties and no later than June 1, 2013. Please note that this offer is contingent upon the successful completion of a background check. 

Once again I’m delighted to have you join the team at Einstein Noah Restaurant Group. 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Dean Mackey on behalf of Jeff O’Neill

	
	Jeff O’Neill
	President and Chief Executive Officer

 I accept the offer as stated above and acknowledge that I have no obligations and/or limitations in terms of being able to
perform the essential job functions. Nor, do I have any contractual arrangements with any organizations which may limit my ability to perform the job to the fullest of my abilities. I understand that employment with Einstein Noah Restaurant Group,
Inc. is at-will, and may be terminated by me or by Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc without notice at any time, without guideline or formality, for any reason or for no reason. 

 

									
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Glenn Lunde
	 		 	Date:	 	 4/19/13
#### GROSJEAN, Collector of Revenue, v. VALLOFT & DREUX, Inc.*

No. 17133.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 6, 1939.

For former opinion, see 185 So. 711.

Deynoodt & de la Vergne and Bennett Meyers, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., and Justin C. Daspit and Maurice B. Gatlin, Sp. Assts. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*

Wrlt of certiorari denied by Suprepae Court April 3, 1939.

PER CURIAM.

When appellant filed a motion for rehearing, appellee — -the Collector of Revenue — -moved to dismiss the application “in*365stanter” on the ground that no rehearing may be granted in view of the provisions of Section 3 of Act No. 14 of the Second Extraordinary Session of 1935, which section, in part, reads as follows: “* * * no new trial, rehearing or devolutive appeal shall be allowed. * * *”

In State v. Standard Oil Co., 188 La. 978, 178 So. 601, the Supreme Court considered this question and said [page 626] : “The language contained in the section providing that judgments shall become executory on the fifth calendar day and ‘no new trial, rehearing or devolutive appeal shall be allowed/ in our opinion applies to judgments of lower courts and not to those of appellate courts.”

We, therefore, did not dismiss the application for rehearing as the Collector of Revenue suggested we should. However, we now deny the rehearing, finding no merit in the application.

Rehearing refused.
I, PAM ESTES, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District

of the State of Texas, do hereby certify that Ben Samford and wife Bette Ann Samford, Cecil

Jackson and wife Michelle Jackson and Sammy Monk, Plaintiffs in the trial court secured an

extension of eighty-three (83) days in which to file Appellees’ Brief in the following numbered

and entitled cause:

Enbridge G & P (East Texas) L.P.

No. 12-13-00307-CV vs.

Ben Samford and wife Bette Ann Samford, Cecil Jackson and wife Michelle Jackson and

Sammy Monk

This certificate is made pursuant to Tex. Rev. Civ. State. Ann. art. 5069, 1.05 sec. 3(c)

(Vernon Supp. 1985) to assist the Clerk of the Trial Court in calculating the amount of postjudgment interest accrued.

WITNESS MY HAND and seal of said Court at Tyler, Texas, this 9th day of October

2015, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: ______________________________

 Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12
PG&E GAS TRANSMISSION, NORTHWEST CORPORATION
SEC FILING - FORM 10-Q - 3RD QTR 1999
EXHIBIT 12 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               For the Three Months Ended                  For the Nine Months Ended
                                          -----------------------------------          ----------------------------------
Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges          1999                      1998               1999                      1998
----------------------------------        ---------                 ---------          --------                 ---------
<S>                                       <C>                       <C>                <C>                      <C>
Earnings
     Net income                                15.9                      15.7              40.8                      45.9
Adjustments:
     Income taxes                               9.9                       8.5              25.3                      27.8
     Fixed charges (as below)                  10.7                      11.0              32.0                      33.0
                                          ---------                 ---------          --------                 ---------
             Total adjusted earnings           36.5                      35.2              98.1                     106.7
                                          =========                 =========          ========                 =========


Fixed charges: (a)
     Net interest expense                      10.5                      10.6              31.1                      32.2
Adjustments:
     Interest component of rents                0.0                       0.0               0.0                       0.0
AFUDC debt                                      0.2                       0.4               0.9                       0.8
                                          ---------                 ---------          --------                 ---------
             Total fixed charges               10.7                      11.0              32.0                      33.0
                                          =========                 =========          ========                 =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              3.4                       3.2               3.1                       3.2
                                          =========                 =========          ========                 =========
</TABLE>
Nothing in this instrument, express or implied, is intended or shall be construed to conferupon, or give to, any person other than Purchaser any remedy or claim under or by reason of thisinstrument or any agreements, terms, covenants or conditions hereof, and all the agreements, terms,covenants and conditions in this instrument contained shall be for the sole and exclusive benefitof Purchaser and its successors and permitted assigns.     Seller acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser assumes no liability, obligation, cost orexpense of Seller whatsoever.     Seller and Shareholder jointly and severally, hereby represent and warrant to Purchaser thatthat Shareholder is the sole shareholder of Seller and Seller has all requisite power and authorityto enter into this Bill of Sale and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Billof Sale and each other agreement and instrument to be executed by Seller in connection herewithhave been (or upon execution shall have been) duly executed and delivered by Seller, have been dulyauthorized by all necessary corporate action and constitute (or upon execution shall constitute)legal, valid and binding obligations of Seller and Shareholder, enforceable against Seller andShareholder in accordance with their respective terms.     This Bill of Sale shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws ofthe State of Ohio without regard to conflict of laws principles.      **Rome Die Casting, LLC**
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. Geological Survey


National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 96-472, the National Earthquake 
Prediction Evaluation Council (NEPEC) will hold a meeting. The meeting 
location is the Hilton Palm Springs Resort, 400 East Tahquitz Canyon 
Way, Palm Springs, California 92262-6605. The Committee is comprised of 
members from academia and the Federal Government. The Committee shall 
advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on proposed 
earthquake predictions, on the completeness and scientific validity of 
the available data related to earthquake predictions, and on related 
matters as assigned by the Director.
    The Council will receive a briefing on the Colaboratory for Study 
of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP), a report on a workshop on Episodic 
Tremor and Slip held last winter, and short reports and updates on 
several other topics. The Council will also discuss the potential need 
to provide advisory reports on short notice if natural observations 
suggest an increased earthquake risk, and the form and content of such 
reports.
    Meetings of the National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council 
are open to the public.

DATES: September 10, 2008, commencing at 1 p.m. and adjourning at 4 
p.m. on September 11, 2008.
    Contact: Dr. William Leith, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 905, 12201 
Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-6786, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ef9e2ebe7fae6cefbfde9fda0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="46312a232f322e063335213568212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 20, 2008.
Suzette M. Kimball,
Associate Director for Geology.
 [FR Doc. E8-19727 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6312 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the rule submitted by the 

Department of Health and Human Services relating to COVID–19 vaccine and mask requirements for Head Start programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Mrs. MCCLAIN (for herself, Mr. ALLEN, and Mr. GOODEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the rule 

submitted by the Department of Health and Human 

Services relating to COVID–19 vaccine and mask requirements for Head Start programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Mandates 

5 on Toddlers Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6312 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING THE HHS RULE ON 

2 HEAD START COVID VACCINE AND MASK RE3 QUIREMENTS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other law, no funds appro5 priated or otherwise made available to the Department of 

6 Health and Human Services shall be obligated or ex7 pended to— 

8 (1) implement or enforce the rule submitted by 

9 the Department of Health and Human Services re10 lating to ‘‘Vaccine and Mask Requirements To Miti11 gate the Spread of COVID–19 in Head Start Pro12 grams’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 68052 (November 30, 2021)); 

13 or 

14 (2) promulgate, implement, or enforce any rule, 

15 regulation, or other agency statement, that is sub16 stantially similar to the rule described in paragraph 

17 (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0183 

# FILED STATE OF MONTANA, 

### MAY 1 5 2020

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. LESLIE PAUL JONES,

Defendant and Appellant. Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf IVInntana ORDER

Counsel for Appellant Leslie Paul Jones moves this Court to withdraw because the scope of representation that had been agreed upon earlier did not include an appeal. Counsel points out that Jones has been incarcerated since his January 15,2020 sentencing, and is thus without resources and indigent. Jones requests appointment ofcounsel from the Appellate Defender Division. Upon review ofthe motion and good cause,therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED,and that appointment of appellate counsel is GRANTED. The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty days from the date of this Order within which to file either a Notice ofAppearance or a Motion to Rescind this Order appointing counsel. In the event the Appellant qualifies for appointed counsel,the Appellate Defender Division shall immediately order transcripts. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to the Appellate Defender Divi% Ito counsel ofrecord,and to Leslie Paul Jones personally. DATED this 

### 5 day ofMay,2020. For the Court,

By ChiefJustice 05/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0183
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6282 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to eliminate immunity 

for manufacturers of COVID–19 vaccines, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. PERRY (for himself and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to 

eliminate immunity for manufacturers of COVID–19 vaccines, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Vaccine 

5 Accountability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIABILITY OF COVID–19 VACCINE MANUFACTURERS. 

7 (a) COVERED COUNTERMEASURE.—Section 319F– 

8 3(i)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d– 

9 6d(i)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6282 IH

1 ‘‘Such term does not include vaccines for 

2 COVID–19 that are required (directly or as a 

3 condition of employment, schooling, or other4 wise) under Federal, State, or local law to be 

5 administered to individuals eligible to receive 

6 such a vaccine.’’. 

7 (b) COVERED PERSON.—Section 319F–3(i)(2) of the 

8 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d(i)(2)) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘Such term does not include a manufacturer of 

11 a vaccine described in the matter following sub12 paragraph (D) of paragraph (1).’’. 

13 (c) LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.—Section 319F–3 of 

14 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d) is 

15 amended by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(j) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.—Pursuant to, and 

17 consistent with, the sovereign immunity reservation speci18 fied in subsection (f), the liability of the United States 

19 for a death or injury caused by the administration of a 

20 vaccine for COVID–19 occurring on or after January 1, 

21 2020 shall not exceed $10,000.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### HUNT v. CHISHOLM (CENTRAL SAV. BANK & TRUST CO., Garnishee).

No. 5612.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 1, 1938.

*333James H. Trousdale, Jr., of Monroe, for appellant.

W. Decker Moore, Hudson, Potts, Bernstein & Snellings, and McHenry, Lamkin *&*Titche, all of Monroe, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff secured a judgment for $3000 for injuries received in an automobile accident against Henry M. Chisholm. A devolutive appeal was taken from said judgment to this court.

Plaintiff issued a writ of fieri facias, coupled with a writ of garnishment, against the Central Savings Bank & Trust Company, of Monroe, Louisiana. In answer to the interrogatories propounded, the garnishee answered that it had no funds in its possession belonging to the defendant. Plaintiff filed a rule to traverse, which was tried, and the original answers of the -garnishee sustained as true. The judgment was signed and filed. At this stage of the proceedings, plaintiff filed a rule on Mrs. Ola H. Chisholm to show cause why certain funds in the garnishee bank, subject only to her check, should not be declared to be the property of the defendant and subject to plaintiff’s lien and garnishment, and prayed that the garnishee bank be ordered to pay unto plaintiff the amount in the bank subject only to Mrs. Ola H. Chisholm’s checks.

To this rule Mrs. Chisholm filed exceptions of no cause or right of action, mis-joinder of parties and a plea of res judi-cata. All of said exceptions were sustained by the lower court. Plaintiff has perfected an appeal from the judgment on the rule to‘traverse, as well as on the rule to show cause.

We are of the opinion we have no jurisdiction in this proceeding and that jurisdiction is in the Supreme Court. Plaintiff is attempting to execute a judgment for $3000. In doing so, he garnisheed the bank which answered that it had no funds' belonging to the judgment debtor, and plaintiff filed a rule to traverse its answers.

No third person has come in claiming any funds seized by plaintiff. • We are therefore of the opinion that the cases of Bacher v. Krauss et al., 179 La. 675, 154 So. 733, and Louisiana Western Lumber Company v. Stanford, 178 La. 1052, 152 So. 755, are controlling, and that the amount of the judgment attempted to be collected is what governs the jurisdiction and not the amount attempted to be seized.

We therefore transfer the case to -the Supreme Court and appellant is allowed sixty (60) days from the date this judgment becomes final within which to properly lodge the record there.