alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,735] 

      ( print page 49495)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on July 24, 2008 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of HTI Hydraulic Technologies, LLC, Galion, Ohio. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification (TA-W-62,679 as amended) which expires on February 22, 2010. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of August 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8-19410 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 35.2

                        Servicer Compliance Statement for
                      Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as Servicer



Avelo Mortgage, LLC
600 E. Las Colinas Blvd. Suite 620
Irving, TX 75039
P: 972.910.7000
F: 972.910.7099


Annual Compliance Statement

1. A review has been  completed of Avelo  Mortgage,  LLC's  ("Avelo")  servicing
activities and its performance  under the servicing  agreement during the period
from  February 24, 2006 through  December  31, 2006.  This review was  completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its  obligations  under  the  agreement  in all  material  respects,  except  as
described in the item below:

For a period  of time in 2006,  bank  accounts  were not  reconciled  in  strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed securities,
related bank accounts,  including  custodial  accounts and related bank clearing
accounts.  These reconciliations are (A) mathematically  accurate;  (B) prepared
within 30 calendar  days after the bank  statement  cutoff  date,  or such other
number  of days  specified  in the  transaction  agreements;  (C)  reviewed  and
approved by someone other than the person who prepared the  reconciliation;  and
(D) contain  explanations for reconciling  items.  These  reconciling  items are
resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification, or such other
number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

The bank account  reconciliations  were current as of December 31, 2006,  and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.

                                       /s/ James Weston Moffett
                                       ------------------------
                                Name:  James Weston Moffett
                                Title: President and CEO
                                Date:  February 28, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



August 13, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated July 22, 2002 on our review of interim
financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation (the "Corporation") as of and
for the period ended June 30, 2002 and included in the Corporation's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-67606), Registration Statement
and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-67606, 333-43890,
33-44380 and 333-36415), Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442,
33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362, 33-62648,
333-42231, and 333-52175) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-8 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061).

Very truly yours,


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Molly Yackel, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of BASIC Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-1 (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC as Servicer.

     Dated: June 26, 2008

     /s/ Molly Yackel
     Signature

     Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
Exhibit 34.3


[LOGO]

                          KPMG LLP
                          1601 Market Street
                          Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 22, 2007

          KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
             member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6376 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6376

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for a 
certain work-study allowance paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
     to certain individuals who pursue programs of rehabilitation, 
  education, or training on at least a half-time basis, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2022

   Mrs. Axne (for herself, Mr. Carson, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Dean, Ms. 
  Norton, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Manning, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Newman, Mr. 
 Schrader, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. Wild, and Mrs. 
    Hayes) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for a 
certain work-study allowance paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
     to certain individuals who pursue programs of rehabilitation, 
  education, or training on at least a half-time basis, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Veteran Work Study 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR A CERTAIN WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE 
              PAID BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO CERTAIN 
              INDIVIDUALS WHO PURSUE PROGRAMS OF REHABILITATION, 
              EDUCATION, OR TRAINING ON AT LEAST A HALF-TIME BASIS.

    (a) Expansion.--Section 3485(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``three-quarters'' 
        and inserting ``half''; and
            (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``three-quarter-
        time'' and inserting ``half-time''.
    (b) Applicability Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to a quarter, semester, or term, as applicable, 
commencing on or after October 1, 2023.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORT REGARDING VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATE IN WORK STUDY.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act 
and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit 
to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of 
Representatives a report regarding veterans who participate in work 
study. Such report shall include the following elements:
            (1) The number of such veterans.
            (2) The percentage of such veterans who obtain a four-year 
        degree.
            (3) The number of such veterans who obtain full-time work 
        at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 98-41217 Summary Calendar

_______________________ TRANSPORTES DE NUEVO LAREDO S.A. DE C.V.; EDUARDO JAVIER HINOJOSA-SANCHEZ; CARLOS LUIS HINOJOSA-SANCHEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus ROADWAY EXPRESS INC; ROADWAY SERVICES INC; TNL-ROADWAY S.A. DE C.V.; BRIAN HICKERT; TRANSCONTINENTAL LEASE S.A. DE C.V., Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(L-96-CV-90)

_________________________________________________________________ August 16, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and perti nent portions of the record. Having done

so, we find no reversible error of fact or law, and in particular, no error in holding that Mexican law is applicable or that2

defend ant Brian Hickert was fraudulently joined to defeat d iversity, and no abuse of discretion in the court’s ultimate dismissal based on forum non conveniens.

AFFIRMED
.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6404 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

114 North Magnolia Street in Elmwood, Illinois, as the ‘‘Corporal Benjamin Desilets Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2022 

Mr. LAHOOD (for himself, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. RUSH, Mr. CASTEN, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

Ms. NEWMAN, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, 

Mr. KINZINGER, Mr. BOST, and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 114 North Magnolia Street in Elmwood, Illinois, as the ‘‘Corporal Benjamin Desilets Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL BENJAMIN DESILETS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 114 North Magnolia Street in 

6 Elmwood, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Corporal Benjamin Desilets Post Office’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6404 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Benjamin 

5 Desilets Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel H. Kanner, Appellant, v. Edmond J. Butler, Commissioner of the Tenement House Department of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
#### Jack Arnold McINTYRE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; Charles Molony Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 03-6467.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 24, 2003.

Decided July 30, 2003.

Jack Arnold McIntyre, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jack Arnold McIntyre seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1040, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McIntyre has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002      In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Energy Services Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kelly Warrack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Kelly Warrack ------------------- Kelly Warrack Chief Financial Officer  March 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-037
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kevin L. COTTON, Appellant.

No. 02-3805.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 2003.

Decided March 17, 2003.

*911Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin L. Cotton was driving a vehicle that was pulled over by a Nebraska State trooper for having oversize tires not covered by the fender or mud flaps, and a defective brake light. After the trooper approached the vehicle, Cotton’s passenger opened his door to provide identification and the trooper smelled a strong odor of burnt marijuana. The trooper searched the vehicle and discovered crack cocaine in the center console. Cotton pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine base (crack cocaine) with the intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1) (2000), and the district court* sentenced Cotton to sixty-five months in prison. Cotton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the crack cocaine as evidence resulting from an unconstitutional traffic stop and search. Because “[a]ny traffic violation, however minor, provides probable cause for a traffic stop,” *United States v. Bloomfield,*40 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), and because an officer who smells burnt marijuana coming from a vehicle has probable cause to search the vehicle for drugs, *United States v. Peltier,*217 F.3d 608, 610 (8th Cir.2000), we agree with the district court that neither the stop nor the search were unconstitutional. The district court properly denied Cotton’s motion to suppress the crack cocaine as evidence at his trial. We thus affirm.

*

 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.