alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (d)


[LOGO] Principal Global Investors

Statement of Compliance

To Wells Fargo Bank National Association, Master Servicer of Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, (see Attachment A):

I, Steven Johnson, in my capacity as Managing Director of Principal Global
Investors, LLC, as a Primary Servicer for mortgage loans securing securities
issued in conjunction with Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, (see
Attachment A), hereby state that:

1.    I am an officer of Principal Global Investors, LLC;

2.    I have reviewed the activities and performance of Principal Global
      Investors, LLC in its capacity as Primary Servicer during the calendar
      year ending December 31, 2006; and

3.    To the best of my knowledge, Principal Global Investors, LLC, as Primary
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects
      under the Primary Servicing Agreement for said Commercial Mortgage
      Pass-Through Certificates, (see Attachment A) throughout the
      above-referenced calendar year.


/s/ Steven Johnson
Steven Johnson, Managing Director
Principal Global Investors, LLC
Date: 2/23/07

A member of the Principal Financial Group

<PAGE>

Attachment A
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

Series 1999-LIFE1 dated August 1, 1999
Series 2000- LIFE1 dated March 1, 2000
Series 2000-PRIN dated September 1, 2000
Series 2000-LIFE2 dated October 1, 2000
Series 2001-TOP1 dated February 1, 2001
Series 2001-TOP2 dated May 1, 2001
Series 2001-TOP3 dated July 1, 2001
Series 2001-TOP4 dated November 1, 2001
Series 2001-TOP5 dated December 1, 2001
Series 2002-TOP6 dated March 1, 2002
Series 2002-TOP7 dated June 1, 2002
Series 2002-TOP8 dated October 1, 2002
Series 2003-Top9 dated February 1, 2003
Series 2003-Top10 dated April 1, 2003
Series 2003-Top11 dated August 1, 2003
Series 2003-Top12 dated October 1, 2003
Series 2004-Top13 dated February 1, 2004
Series 2004-Top14 dated April 1, 2004
Series 2004-IQ7 dated May 1, 2004
Series 2004-Top15 dated July 1, 2004
Series 2004-IQ8 dated August 1, 2004
Series 2004-Top16 dated November 1, 2004
Series 2005-Top17 dated January 1, 2005
Series 2005-IQ9 dated February 1, 2005
Series 2005-Top18 dated April 1, 2005
Series 2005-PWR 8 dated June 1, 2005
Series 2005-Top19 dated July 1, 2005
Series 2005-PWR9 dated September 2005
Series 2005-Top20 dated October 1, 2005
Series 2005 HQ7 dated November 1, 2005
Series 2005 PWR10 dated December 1, 2005
Series 2006-Top21 dated January 1, 2006
Series 2006 PWR11 dated March 1, 2006
Series 2006-Top22 dated April 1, 2006
Series 2006-PWR12 dated June 1, 2006
Series 2006-Top23 dated August 1, 2006
Series 2006-HQ9 dated August 1, 2006
Series 2006-PWR13 dated September 1, 2006
Series 2006-Top24 dated October 1, 2006
Series 2006-PWR14 dated December 1, 2006
|Exhibit 12                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Peoples Energy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies             
|                                                                
|Statement Re:  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|(Dollars in Thousands)                                          
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Net Income Before Preferred                                     
|Stock Dividends, as reported                                    
|                                                                
|Change in undistributed earnings from equity investees          
|                                                                
|Add - Income Taxes                                              
|Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest                    
|                                                                
|Earnings                                                        
|                                                                
|Fixed charges including capitalized interest                    
|                                                                
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT 32

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section  906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this
periodic  report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a)  or
15(d),  as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that  the
information  contained  in  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of
operations of Spartech Corporation.


                                        Date: September 8, 2003


                                        /s/ Bradley B. Buechler
                                        Bradley B. Buechler
                                        Chairman, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Randy C. Martin
                                        Randy C. Martin
                                        Executive Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 5, 2015 520346 

________________________________

In the Matter of JOSE A. ROMAN, 

Petitioner, 

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of 

Special Housing and Inmate

Disciplinary Programs, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 22, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Jose A. Roman, Brocton, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a

prison disciplinary rule.

After petitioner's urine twice tested positive for the

presence of synthetic marihuana, he was charged in a misbehavior

report with use of an intoxicant. Following a tier III

disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty and that

determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR

article 78 proceeding ensued. 

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive test results

and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to
-2- 520346 

support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Harriot v

Annucci, 131 AD3d 754, 754 [2015]). A review of the record

establishes that petitioner was given all relevant documentary

evidence (see Matter of Paddyforte v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1240, 1241

[2014]; Matter of Jones v Venettozzi, 114 AD3d 980, 981 [2014]). 

Furthermore, the chain of custody and adherence to proper testing

procedures were established through the documentary evidence and

testimony from the correction officer who performed the

urinalysis tests (see Matter of Cagle v Fischer, 108 AD3d 913,

913 [2013]). To the extent that petitioner asserts that he was

improperly charged with use of an intoxicant, we find his

contention to be unpersuasive (see Matter of Ralands v Prack, 131

AD3d 1334, 1335 [2015]). Petitioner's remaining contentions have

been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis TERAN, also known as Tomas Lopez-Burgos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50118.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Jose Luis Teran appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Teran contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Teran maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. Alternatively, he argues that construing 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) as a sentence-enhancement provision renders the statute unconstitutional.

In *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. *Id.*at 239-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219. Teran acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres,*but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review.

*Apprendi*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348; *United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” *Dabeit,*231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Hayman Defrin, an Infant, by Max Defrin, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Joseph H. Goldstein, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Jenks, JJ., dissented.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Solera National Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the
annual period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



SOLERA NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.Dated: March 26, 2009By:

/s/ DOUGLAS CRICHFIELD Douglas Crichfield President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: March 26, 2009By:

/s/ ROBERT J. FENTON Robert J. Fenton Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solera National
Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Solera National Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 3.2**

 

 

 

 

BY-LAWS

OF

PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

AMENDED MAY 1, 2002

 

 

 

 

PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION

 

BY-LAWS

 

 

ARTICLE I
-
Offices
 
 
 
ARTICLE II
-
Meetings of Shareholders
 
 
 
ARTICLE III
-
Directors and Committees
 
 
 
ARTICLE IV
-
Officers
 
 
 
ARTICLE V
-
Indemnification of Directors,
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 
  

			
	



	  	
		  	 Arista Networks, Inc.

5453 Great America Parkway
 Santa
Clara, CA 95054


 April 4, 2014 
 Via
Overnight Delivery and Email 
 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 

The Bechtolsheim Family Trust 
 5453 Great America Parkway 

Santa Clara, CA 95054 
 Attn: Andreas Bechtolsheim 

Email: avb@aristanetworks.com 
  

	 	RE:	Notice Regarding Conversion of Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note issued by Arista Networks, Inc. to The Bechtolsheim Family Trust dated January 4, 2011 (the “Note”) 


Dear Sir or Madam: 
 Arista Networks, Inc. (the
“Company”) has recently confidentially submitted a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (“Registration Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of conducting a firm commitment
underwritten public offering of the Company’s Securities (“Initial Public Offering”). 
 The purpose of this letter is to
(a) provide you notice of the proposed Initial Public Offering and that the Company may name you in the Registration Statement pursuant to SEC rules or regulations or requests related thereto, and (b) confirm your agreement that upon
closing of the Initial Public Offering (the “IPO Closing Date”) you shall elect to convert, in accordance with, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Note including Section 4 thereof, the outstanding principal amount
of the Note, together with all unpaid interest accruing thereon up to the IPO Closing Date (the “Outstanding Indebtedness”), into fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the price per share of the
Company’s Common Stock in the Initial Public Offering (the “IPO Price”). 
 We will inform you of the expected IPO Closing Date,
Outstanding Indebtedness and IPO Price as soon as practicable prior to the IPO Closing Date. 
 For sake of clarity, this notice shall not be deemed a
prepayment notice under Section 1 of the Note. Additionally, your confirmation and election to the conversion of the Note and payment of any and all accrued interest shall be subject to the completion of the Initial Public Offering. 

  
 1 








 Please confirm your agreement to the matters herein by signing and returning this letter to me as soon as
possible but in no event later than April 15, 2014 via email to mtaxay@aristanetworks.com while sending the original to the address listed above. We look forward to furthering our relationship with you and would appreciate your prompt
response. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Jayshree Ullal
	Jayshree Ullal
	President and Chief Executive Officer


 Enclosures 
 ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO 
 ON THIS 4th DAY OF APRIL 2014: 

THE BECHTOLSHEIM FAMILY TRUST 
  

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andreas Bechtolsheim
		
	Name: 	 	Andreas Bechtolsheim
		
	Title:	 	Trustee
		
	Date:	 	4/4/2014


  
 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6310 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6310

   To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse 
  located at 111 South Highland Avenue in Jackson, Tennessee, as the 
  ``James D. Todd United States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2021

 Mr. Kustoff (for himself, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Rose, Mrs. 
Harshbarger, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Green of Tennessee, and 
 Mr. Cooper) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse 
  located at 111 South Highland Avenue in Jackson, Tennessee, as the 
  ``James D. Todd United States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building utilized as a United States courthouse located at 111 
South Highland Avenue in Jackson, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``James D. Todd United States Courthouse'' during the 
period in which the building is utilized as a United States courthouse.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    With respect to the period in which the building referred to in 
section 1 is utilized as a United States courthouse, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``James D. Todd United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001027574
   <NAME>  Outsourcing Solutions Inc.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
Exhibit 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


          Name of Subsidiary             Jurisdiction       Percentage Ownership
-----------------------------------      ------------       --------------------
    Arocon Security Corporation            Delaware               100.0%
    Electric Fuel (E.F.L.) Ltd.             Israel                100.0%
 Electric Fuel Battery Corporation         Delaware               100.0%
 Electric Fuel Transportation Corp.        Delaware               100.0%
Epsilor Electronic Industries, Ltd.         Israel                100.0%
         FAAC Incorporated                 Michigan               100.0%
   IES Interactive Training, Inc.          Delaware               100.0%
       MDT Armor Corporation                Israel                 88.0%
  MDT Protective Industries, Ltd.           Israel                 75.5%
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

t0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142571

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142571 COA: 291016 Wayne CC: 08-014944-FC DESHAWN CARY HENDRIX, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Z AHRA 

### , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Order entered September 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00380-CV

RICHARD A. MYERS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

LINDA PAVLIK, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-13928

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ September 10, 2013 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a reply brief. Appellants shall file their reply brief on or before Monday, 

September 30, 2013.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6278 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to make a violation of such 

Act, relating to the enforcement of a storage lien, a felony. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. MOULTON (for himself and Mrs. TRAHAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to make a 

violation of such Act, relating to the enforcement of 

a storage lien, a felony. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR ENFORCEMENT 

4 OF A STORAGE LIEN IN VIOLATION OF THE 

5 SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT. 

6 Section 307(c) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 

7 (50 U.S.C. 3958(c)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6278 IH

1 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘MIS2 DEMEANOR’’ and inserting ‘‘CRIMINAL PENALTIES’’; 

3 (2) by striking all that follows ‘‘so’’ and insert4 ing an em dash; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraphs: 

7 ‘‘(1) shall be fined as provided in title 18, or 

8 imprisoned for not more than one year, or both; or 

9 ‘‘(2) after a prior conviction under this section 

10 has become final, shall be fined as provided in title 

11 18, or imprisoned for not more than three years, or 

12 both.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS