alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-201036) pertaining to the 2006 Stock Option Plan, 2011 Stock Option Plan, 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, and 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Houston, Texas

March 20, 2015
<PAGE>   1
                    PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
(Unaudited; dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     March 31,   December 31,
                                                       2001         2000
                                                    ----------   -----------
<S>                                                 <C>          <C>
Short-term debt ...............................     $    690.2        518.2
Current portion of long-term debt .............          306.8        206.5
Long-term debt ................................        1,853.2      1,963.0
                                                    ----------    ---------
     Total debt ...............................        2,850.2      2,687.7

Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries           67.2         91.7
Common shareholders' equity ...................        3,033.9      3,105.0
                                                    ----------    ---------
     Total capitalization .....................     $  5,951.3      5,884.4
                                                    ==========    =========

Ratio of total debt to total capitalization ...           47.9%        45.7%
                                                    ==========    =========
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commercial Property Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, David C. Merrell, President and Corie Merrell of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/David C. Merrell
     ----------                            ---------------------
                                           David C. Merrell
                                           President and director

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/Corie Merrell
     ----------                            ----------------------
                                           Corie Merrell
                                           Secretary/Treasurer and
                                           director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY QUINN RODEHEAVER, SR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 171 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,833] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 7, 2008, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of CMA Actuation Products, Philipsburg, Pennsylvania. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of August, 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-19403 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6386 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6386

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, as the ``Veterans of 
          Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. VETERANS OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Veterans 
of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 23

- 0 811

_____________________________ A LVARIO M C C RAY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Dustin Stephenson , Judge

. January 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Alvario McCray , pro se , Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appell ee

.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6109 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income cap 

for and make permanent the mortgage insurance premium deduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2021 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. BUCHANAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the income cap for and make permanent the mortgage 

insurance premium deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Middle Class Mortgage 

5 Insurance Premium Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE INCOME CAP FOR AND MAKING 

7 PERMANENT THE MORTGAGE INSURANCE 

8 PREMIUM DEDUCTION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Section 163(h)(3)(E) of the 

10 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6109 IH

1 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘$100,000 

2 ($50,000)’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000 ($100,000)’’, 

3 and 

4 (2) by striking clause (iv). 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this Act shall apply to taxable years beginning after De7 cember 31, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), is made and entered into April 30, 2014, by and among
Signature Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and W. Christopher Manderson (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend that certain Employment Agreement dated November 5, 2012 by and between the Company and Executive
(the “Agreement”) to extend the Term of Agreement by four months. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Amendments. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, Section 1.1 of the Agreement shall be amended in its
entirety to provide as follows: 
 “1.1 Term of Employment. The “Term” pursuant
to this Agreement shall commence on November 5, 2012 and, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 4 hereto, shall terminate on July 31, 2014.” 

2. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. This
Amendment shall be deemed part of and is hereby incorporated into the Agreement. To the extent that any term or condition of the Agreement shall contradict or be in conflict with any term or condition of this Amendment, the terms and conditions of
this Amendment shall control. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement, and it is understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. In
the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile or electronic transmission, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) same with the same force and effect
as if such signature were an original thereof. This Amendment cannot be altered, amended, changed or modified in any respect or particular except by an instrument in writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been signed by the parties hereto effective as of the date set forth above. 

 

			
	SIGNATURE GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Craig T. Bouchard
		 	 Craig T. Bouchard
 Chief Executive
Officer



  

	
	
	
	/s/ W. Christopher Manderson
	W. CHRISTOPHER MANDERSON
IEC-EX10.4_2014.3.28-10Q


Exhibit 10.4




Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Brett E. Mancini


IEC Electronics Corp. (the “Company”) has the following compensatory arrangements with Brett E. Mancini, Vice President, Business Development and Engineering Solutions:


Mr. Mancini’s base salary is $183,000 per year.  He participates in the Company’s short term management incentive plan (“MIP”) at 50% of salary at target.  He also participates in the Company’s long term management incentive plan (“LTIP”) at 20% of salary at target.  The MIP for fiscal 2014 is described in Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 24, 2013 (which incorporated by reference Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 20, 2013).  The LTIP for fiscal 2014 is described in Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 24, 2013 (which incorporated by reference Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 20, 2013).


The Company maintains an $800,000 life insurance policy on Mr. Mancini’s life, payable to his designee.


Additionally, Mr. Mancini received an award of 30,000 restricted shares on January 29, 2014 in connection with his promotion as an executive officer of the Company.  The shares vest over four years (10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%).  


Mr. Mancini and the Company entered into a Salary Continuation and Non-Competition Agreement effective as of January 29, 2014, a copy of which is filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2014.
#### Oliver L. VARDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, and Donald Forscht, U. S. Marshal in and for the Southern District of Fla., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 75-2180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 1976.

Donald I. Bierman, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.

Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., William Northcutt, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., B. Franklin Taylor, Act. Chief, Gov.Reg.Sec., James P. Morris, Murray R. Stein, John L. Murphy, Attys., Washington, D. C., for respondents-appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In response to petitioner’s spirited assertion that the panel opinion improperly departs from *In re Chan Kam-Shu,*477 F.2d 333 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*414 U.S. 847, 94 S.Ct. 112, 38 L.Ed.2d 94 (1973), we observe that our opinion is not at variance with *Chan Kam-Shu,*which is not applicable here because of critical factual differences. In *Chan Kam-Shu,*the only reason supported by the record for Chan’s presence in the United States at the time of the extradition request was the fact that he was being held in jail by federal officials. Here, in contrast, Vardy was in the United States because he chose to remain here rather than complete the journey from Panama to Canada. Federal officials had no role in his entrance into the United States, and their only role in detaining him in this country was to effectuate his own desire.

The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 625 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 625

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand school choice 
 opportunities for children of active duty members of the Armed Forces 
                         of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2021

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, 
Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   Calvert, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Latta, Mr. Hagedorn, Mr. 
Perry, and Mr. Carl) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand school choice 
 opportunities for children of active duty members of the Armed Forces 
                         of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Child Educational Freedom 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULE FOR HOME SCHOOLS OF ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY.

    (a) In General.--Section 530(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Special rule for home schools of active duty 
                members of the armed forces of the united states.--For 
                purposes of clauses (i) and (iii) of subparagraph (A), 
                if either the taxpayer or the spouse of the taxpayer is 
                serving on extended active duty (within the meaning of 
                section 32(c)(4)) in the Armed Forces of the United 
                States at the time the expense is incurred, the terms 
                `public, private, or religious school' and `school' 
                shall include any home school which provides elementary 
                or secondary education if such school is treated under 
                State law as a home school or a private school.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin G. Moug, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Kevin G. Moug   Kevin G. Moug
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Raymond P.L. Cannefax,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

       (a)    the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (b)    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material respect, the financial condition and result of operations
              of the Company.




                                           /s/ Raymond P.L. Cannefax
                                           -------------------------------------
Date: March 31, 2007                       Raymond P.L. Cannefax
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

                                 QUARTER ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                 May 1,    May 2,    May 1,    May 2,
                                 1999      1998      1999      1998

NET EARNINGS
  Basic net earnings           $  11,105  $  8,863  $ 20,262  $ 15,884
  Add:  Distributions on
   Preferred Securities,
   net of tax                        305         -       305         -

  Diluted net earnings            11,410     8,863    20,567    15,884

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
 OUTSTANDING
  Basic weighted average common
   shares outstanding             26,895    26,764    26,895    26,611
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed conversion of
   Preferred Stock                 1,025         -       513         -
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed exercise of options     1,853     1,964     1,852     1,834

  Diluted weighted average        29,773    28,728    29,260    28,445
   shares outstanding


NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Basic                         $    .41  $    .33  $    .75  $    .60
  Diluted                       $    .38  $    .31  $    .70  $    .56
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7573** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

MARIO ALBERTO GARCIA HOLGUIN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for th e Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 5:04

- cr
- 00025

- GEC

- 4 )

Submitted : February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curia m opinion

.

Mario Alberto Garcia Holguin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mario Alberto Garcia Holguin appeals the district
court’s order granting his motion to reduce his sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Holguin , No. 5:04

- cr
00025

- GEC (W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIR MED
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Thomas J. Paup, certify that:
  1.      I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Arotech Corporation;
  2.      Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended annual report;
  Date: September 12, 2013
 By: /s/ Thomas J. Paup
 Thomas J. Paup,
 Senior Vice President – Finance and CFO
 (Chief Financial Officer)