T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D LI ND ON HA RP I NE, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. I G N A C I O D E L A S H E R A S , in h is i ndi vi dua l c apa c i tya s C l i ni c a l D i r e c t or a n dJ AS P AL DH AL I WAL , i n h i s o wn i nd i vi du al capaci ty a s M edi ca l D i re ct or at the F eder al C orre ct i on al Inst i tut i on at S he r i da n, O r e gon, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 35910 D. C. No . 6 : 0 7 - c v - 0 1 8 8 2 - TC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon A nn A i ke n, C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED DE C 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35910 2 D avi d L i nd on H arpi ne, a f eder al pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s s um m ary j ud gm enti n h i s a ct i on un der B i ve ns v. Si x U nkno w n N

am ed A gent s of Fed. B ureau o

f N arcot i cs , 4 0 3 U .S . 3 8 8 ( 1 9 7 1 ) a lle g in g d e lib e r a te i n d i f f e r e n c e t o h i s s e r i o u s me d i c a l n e e d s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w s u m m a ryju d g m e n t d e n o v o . J one s v . B lanas , 393 F . 3d 918, 9 2 6 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f f i rm. Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yg r a n t e ds u mma ryj u d g me n to n H a rp i n e ’ s c l a i ms agai nstdefe nd antD e L as H er as because H arpi ne fa i l ed t o p re se ntevi dence c r e a tin g ag e n u in e is s u e o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rD e L a s H e r a s p u rp o s e f u lly ig n o r e do rf

a ile d to r e s p o n d to H a rp in e ’s m e d ic a l c o n d itio n . See McG ucki n v. Sm i th, 9 7 4 F .2 d 1 0 5 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ) , o v e rr u le d o n o th e rg r o u n d

s b yW M X T e c h s ., Inc. v. Mi l ler , 1 0 4 F .3 d 1 1 3 3 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 7 ) . Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yg r a n t e ds u mma ryj u d g me n to n H a rp i n e ’ s c l a i ms a ga i ns tde f

e nda ntD ha l i w a l be c aus e H a rpi ne f a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne i s s ue of m at er i al fa ctas t o D hal i w al ’ s a l l eged del i bera t e i nd i ff er ence . D hal i w al pres cr i bed va r i ous pa i n ki l l e r s a nd be ha vi orc ha nge t o tr e a tthe c ondi t i on a nd r e f e rr e d H a rpi ne t o speci al i st s t o eval uat e hi s c on di t i on and o pi ne as t o the need for further treatm en t . T h atth i s w as n o tth e treatm en tH arp i n e d esi red d o es n o tren d er i t“ so ou tra geou s a s t o am ou ntt o n o tre atm entatal l . ” Sh i elds v. Kun ke l , 442 F . 3d 409,09- 35910 3 4 0 9 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 7 1 ) ; see a l so Sa n c h ezv . V

ild , 8 9 1 F .2 d2 4 0 (9 th C ir. 1 9 8 9 ) ( “A di f f e r e nc e of opi ni on doe s nota m ountt o ade l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e t o . . . s e r i ous m edi ca l needs. ”) . H arpi ne’ s m ot i on for r ec on si dera t i on i s deni ed. H i s m ot i on for j ud i ci al n o tic e is g r a n te d b u t h is m o tio n f o ra n o r d e ris d e n ie da s u n n e c e s s a ry . H arpi ne’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are no tpers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.