alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henry Johnson v. State.

No. 24650.

February 8, 1950.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for possessing liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with a fine of $100.

When the case was called for trial appellant timely filed a motion to quash the complaint and information on the alleged ground that same is too indefinite and uncertain and does not point out with sufficient certainty the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed. The court properly overruled this motion.

After the trial and conviction, a motion in arrest of judgment was filed alleging that there is a variance between the complaint and information and that the complaint was not sworn to by anyone shown to have authority to do so.

The state’s attorney has filed a brief admitting error in that the complaint says it was sworn to and subscribed before B. P. Maddox, but does not show the authority of this person to so act. He cites Robertson v. State, 25 Texas App. 529, 8 S. W. 659. This case seems to have been followed in a number of cases to the present time. See Articles 220, 221 and 222, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P., and annotations thereunder.

It clearly appears that the affidavit is no affidavit at all, under the holdings of this court, and, therefore, the complaint *258is void. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Hawkins, P. J., Absent.
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Shore Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  February 7, 2006

/s/  Thomas A. Nardi
Exhibit 35.1


Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York.

I, David Ayerdis, Vice President - The Bank of New York, a New York
corporation (the "Trustee"), state:

A review of the Trustee's activities for the period from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") and of the Trustee's
performance under each Trust Agreement, delivered with respect to the trusts
listed on the attached schedule has been made under my supervision, and to the
best of my knowledge based on such review, the Trustee fulfilled all of its
obligations under each Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period for each of the trusts listed in the attached schedule.



Date: March 28, 2007                        /s/ David Ayerdis
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Vice President
                                            The Bank of New York


<PAGE>


                                         Schedule

Trust                               Trust Agreement
-----                               ---------------

STRATS(SM) Trust for Proctor &      STRATS(SM) Series Supplement 2006-1, dated
Gamble Securities, Series 2006-1    as of February 28, 2006, between Synthetic
                                    Fixed-Income Securities, Inc., as Trustor
                                    and Depositor, and The Bank of New York, as
                                    Trustee and Securities Intermediary,
                                    supplementing the Trust Agreement, dated as
                                    of February 28, 2006, between such parties.

STRATS(SM) Trust for Goldman        STRATS(SM) Series Supplement 2006-2, dated
Sachs Securities, Series 2006-2     as of March 31, 2006, between Synthetic
                                    Fixed-Income Securities, Inc., as Trustor
                                    and Depositor, and The Bank of New York, as
                                    Trustee and Securities Intermediary,
                                    supplementing the Trust Agreement, dated as
                                    of February 28, 2006, between such parties.

STRATS(SM) Trust for Allstate       STRATS(SM) Series Supplement 2006-3, dated
Corporation Securities, Series      as of April 28, 2006, between Synthetic
2006-3                              Fixed-Income Securities, Inc., as Trustor
                                    and Depositor, and The Bank of New York, as
                                    Trustee and Securities Intermediary,
                                    supplementing the Trust Agreement, dated as
                                    of February 28, 2006, between such parties.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ronald Rideman, Acting CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Ronald Rideman
|Ronald Rideman    
|Acting CFO        

Dated: May 15, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Company
 At December 31, 2008
 State or Jurisdictionof Organization
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    Ownership%Delaware
    
    Concho Equity Holdings LLC
    
    
    100
    %Delaware
    
    COG Operating LLC
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    COG Realty LLC
    
    
    100
    %Delaware
    
    Concho LP LLC
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    Concho Energy Services LLC
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    COG Oil & Gas LP
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    Concho Oil & Gas Holdings LP
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    Concho GP LLC
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    Quail Ranch LLC
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    Henry Petroleum LP
    
    
    100
    %Texas
    
    Aguasal Holding LLC
    
    
    100
    %
EXHIBIT 12.1

Kimball Hill, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Amounts in thousands, except ratio of earnings to fixed charges)

|                                                                                |  | Year ended September 30, |         
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------
|
|Earnings:                                                                       |  |                          |         
|(Losses) earnings before income taxes                                           |  | $                        | (267,003
|Equity in losses (income) of unconsolidated joint ventures                      |  |                          | 20,373  
|Minority interests in net (losses) earnings of consolidated partnerships        |  |                          | (15,203 
|Fixed charges (from below)                                                      |  |                          | 52,750  
|Distributed income from unconsolidated joint ventures                           |  |                          | 1,842   
|Less: Interest capitalized                                                      |  |                          | (48,266 
|Interest amortized to cost of sales                                             |  |                          | 38,079  
|                                                                                |  |                          |         
|(Losses) earnings available for fixed charges                                   |  | $                        | (217,429
|Fixed charges:                                                                  |  |                          |         
|Interest incurred, including capitalized amounts and amortization of debt costs |  | $                        | 50,482  
|Estimated interest component of rent expense                                    |  |                          | 2,268   
|                                                                                |  |                          |         
|Total fixed charges                                                             |  | $                        | 52,750  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                              |  |                          |         
|Coverage deficiency                                                             |  | $                        | 270,178 

---
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ J. Hicks LanierJ. Hicks Lanier
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  /s/ K. Scott GrassmyerK. Scott Grassmyer

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit (11)
                                                                 
                 OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                
                COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<S>                                        <C>           <C>
                                                Quarter Ended
                                                  March 31,
                                             1999        1998
                                         (In millions of dollars,
                                             except share data)
Basic:

Net income                               $      44     $      8

Basic weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding
  (thousands)                               53,932       53,373

Basic per share amount                   $     .81     $    .16

Diluted:

Net income                               $      46     $      8

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding (thousands)            53,932       53,373
Weighted average common equivalent
  shares (thousands):
  Deferred awards                              563          352
  Stock options using the higher of
    average market price or market
    price at end of period                     205          120
  Shares from assumed conversion
    of preferred securities                  4,566            -

Diluted weighted average number
   of common shares outstanding and
   common equivalent shares (thousands)     59,266       53,845

Diluted per share amount                 $     .77     $    .16
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David C. Habiger, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.




This
certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




Date:
      May 29, 2009By:
                /s/ David C. HabigerName:
      David C. HabigerTitle:
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2006-13 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
#### UNITED STATED of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert WOODBURY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-30329. D.C. No. CR-01-00110-RFC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 29, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Robert Woodbury appeals his forty-two-month sentence, following a guilty plea conviction for money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) pursuant to a plea agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Woodbury first challenges the district court’s imposition of a three-level upward adjustment for being a manager or supervisor within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(b). We review for clear error a district court’s finding that a defendant qualifies for a role adjustment. *United States v. Maldonado,*215 F.3d 1046, 1050 (9th Cir.2000). Woodbury claims that the undisputed facts contained in the presentence report are insufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he exercised any control or authority over others. We disagree. Because § 3B1.1(b) only requires some, rather than complete, control over others, *see United States v. Egge,*223 F.3d 1128, 1131-32 (9th Cir. *6992000), and the uncontested facts show that Woodbury instructed others on transferring the funds, often compensated them, and on at least one occasion provided transportation, we find no clear error. *See also United States v. Varela,*993 F.2d 686, 692 (9th Cir.1993) (finding an upward adjustment under § 3B1.1 proper where a defendant “coordinate[ed] the activities of the other participants to the extent necessary to complete the transaction”).

Woodbury next challenges his sentence on Eighth Amendment grounds, arguing that his sentence is the functional equivalent of life imprisonment because he only has a two-year life expectancy. The Supreme Court, however, recently rejected this argument in *Lockyer v. Andrade,*— U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1174 n. 1, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert L. Parker Jr.

Robert L. Parker Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  40
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION 
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934



In connection with the Annual Report ofHLS Systems International, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Herriet
Qu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2008 and results
of operations of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2008.

| |                |                                             |  | 
| | -------------- | ------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |                |                                            
| | /s/ Herriet Qu |                                            
| | Name:          | Herriet Qu                                  | 
| | Title:
  Date: | Chief Financial Officer
  December 12, 2008 | 





---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6433 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6433

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the tax 
     exemption of the International Olympic Committee and similar 
                             organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2022

  Mr. Waltz (for himself, Ms. Wexton, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Reschenthaler, and Ms. Salazar) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the tax 
     exemption of the International Olympic Committee and similar 
                             organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Irresponsible Olympic Collaboration 
Act'' or as the ``IOC Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC 
              COMMITTEE AND SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(s) Elimination of Tax Exemption for International Olympic 
Committee and Similar Organizations.--If any organization or entity for 
any taxable year--
            ``(1) has the primary purpose of international, multi-
        sport, athletic competitions, and
            ``(2) has gross receipts in excess of $100,000,000 for any 
        of the 3 preceding taxable years,
such organization shall not be treated as described in subsection 
(c)(4) for such taxable year; and no successor of any organization or 
entity which was described in such subsection and ceases to be so 
described by reason of the enactment of this subsection shall be 
treated as described in any paragraph of subsection (c) for any 
subsequent taxable year.''.
    (b) Special Rule for Treaties.--Nothing in section 894 or 7852(d) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or in any other provision of law 
shall be construed as permitting an exemption, by reason of any treaty 
obligation of the United States heretofore or hereafter entered into, 
from the amendment made by this section.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```