alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
**RELEASE OF SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEE**

Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee") under the Indenture (the "Indenture"),
dated November 6, 1996, among the Outsourcing Solutions Inc., the subsidiary guarantors
named therein and the Trustee, hereby acknowledges and agrees that in accordance with
Section 11.04 of the Indenture, effective September 30, 2000, OSI Education Services, Inc.
is released and relieved of its Obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee and any Liens in
favor of the Trustee in the assets of OSI Education Services, Inc. are released.
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms
in the Indenture.

                                    WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                    not in its individual capacity, but solely
                                    as trustee

                                    By:       /s/  Bruce L. Bisson     

                                    Title:         Vice President
```
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                                                      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 30, 2010  | By:    | /s/ Anthony P. Costa                                 |   |
|                       |   | Anthony P. Costa, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                       |   |                                                      |   |
|                       |   |                                                      |   |

|                       |   |                                    |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                                    |   |
| Date: March 30, 2010  | By:    | /s/ Thomas Sperzel                 |   |
|                       |   | Thomas Sperzel, Chief Financial Officer |   |
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. W. J. MYERS v. L. O. RENEAU et al.

No. 5296.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 4, 1936.

Hoye Grafton, of Shreveport, for appellants.

Mabry & Carstarphen, of Shreveport, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

This case was fixed for trial on a motion to dismiss the appeal, and also on a writ of certiorari to the clerk of the district court to order him to complete the record.

On the day fixed for trial, the attorneys for both plaintiff and defendants appeared in open court and requested that the appeal be dismissed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal in this case be dismissed, at appellants’ cost
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**P& F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard A. Horowitz     |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Horowitz         |
| Principal Executive Officer |
| May 17, 2004                |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50307-50308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administation

(C-570-940)


Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof from 
the People's Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary 
Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 26, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Calvert or Paul Matino, AD/CVD

[[Page 50308]]

Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 
482-3586 and (202) 482-4146, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 14, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated the countervailing duty investigation on certain tow-behind 
lawn groomers and certain parts thereof (lawn groomers) from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC). See Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers 
and Certain Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: 
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 73 FR 42324 (July 21, 
2008). The preliminary determination is currently due no later than 
September 17, 2008.

Postponement of Due Date for Preliminary Determination

    On August 8, 2008, Agri-Fab, Inc., petitioner, requested that the 
Department postpone the preliminary determination in the countervailing 
duty investigation on lawn groomers from the PRC until November 17, 
2008. Under section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), the Department may extend the deadline for the preliminary 
determination in a countervailing duty investigation until no later 
than the 130th day\1\ after the date on which the administering 
authority initiates an investigation, if the petitioner makes a timely 
request for an extension of the period within which the determination 
must be made under section 703(b) of the Act. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.205(e), petitioner's request for postponement of the preliminary 
determination was made 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the 
preliminary determination. Accordingly, we are extending the due date 
for the preliminary determination to no later than November 17, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In this investigation, the 130th day after the date of 
initiation is November 21, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) 
and of the Act.

    Dated: August 20, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary For Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-19777 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
CERTIFICATION
 
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Steve Dai, Chief Financial Officer of Yucheng
Technologies Limited (the “Company”), certify, to my knowledge, that the
Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
June 30, 2010
 
 /s/ Steve
Dai
 Name:
Steve Dai
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
   
  The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure
 document.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1665SI

_____________ Hatsady Leutfaimany, * * Appellant, *

* v. * * Appeal from the United States Polk County Iowa; Bob Rice, Sheriff, * District Court for the Southern Individually and in his official capacity * District of Iowa. as Polk County Sheriff; Brent Long, * Deputy Sheriff, Individually and in his * [UNPUBLISHED] official capacity as Polk County Deputy * Sheriff; John Sarcone, in his official * capacity only, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: December 16, 1998

Filed: December 23, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Hatsady Leutfaimany's appeal has been submitted on the briefs. Havin g conside redthe record and the parties' arguments, we conclude the district court' s decision is clearly correct. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Republic_Arnell_Employment_Agreement_Amendment






AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of February 28, 2014, by and between REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and LARS-ERIK ARNELL (the “Executive”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of April 12, 2011 (as amended on September 24, 2013, November 6, 2013, and January 24, 2014, the “Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.    Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated to read in full:  “(a)  The term of employment pursuant to this Agreement (the “Term”) shall continue until June 30, 2014; provided that the Company may terminate this Agreement for any reason or no reason by providing the Executive with 30 days prior written notice of such termination.”
2.    Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall be effective upon signature by both the Company and the Executive.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC.


By: /s/Mark L. Plaumann
Name: Mark L. Plaumann
Title:   Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors




LARS-ERIK ARNELL


/s/Lars-Erik Arnell



I/3515222.2
#### BARTHOLOMEW v. IMPASTATO et al.

No. 17786.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 26, 1943.

Writ of Certiorari Denied June 21, 1943.

For former opinion, see 12 So.2d 700.

Borris Burk, of New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Clay & Kohlman and James J. Kohlman, all of New Orleans, for defendants-appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

In an application for a rehearing, counsel for the defendants have vehemently attacked the action of this court in rendering a final judgment in plaintiff’s favor on the merits of the case, although they concede, as they must, that they stated to us during oral argument in open court that they desired to submit the matter for final decision on the record and that it would be vain and useless to remand the case to the lower court, in the event we disagreed with the ruling of the judge on the exception, because defendants did not wish to submit any evidence to refute the testimony given on behalf of the plaintiff. And, as stated in our original opinion, counsel agreed, at our suggestion, to file a written stipulation to the effect that the case would be considered as submitted for final decision on the evidence in the record. This stipulation was not filed and counsel do not attempt to excuse their failure to do so. Counsel now contend that the court has misconstrued. their willingness to submit the case for final decision on the evidence and that, as a matter of fact, they intended only that they had no objection, if the court felt that the judge of the lower court was wrong in maintaining the exception, to have the court decide the case on the merits, provided the decision was favorable *125to the defendants. We must confess our amazement and surprise with respect to this belated and unfounded explanation by-counsel of the effect which they intended to be given to their voluntary offer- — which is, that their willingness to submit the case on plaintiff’s evidence for final decision was conditioned upon a favorable judgment. Of course, it is self-evident that this or no other court would entertain a proposal, such as the one counsel now say was intended by them.

Counsel further state in their application that they were not given the opportunity of presenting argument on the merits of the case. This statement is wholly incorrect as we did not limit counsel in any manner with respect to the nature of the argument they desired to present on behalf of their clients at the hearing.

The other matters complained of in the application for rehearing have been fully considered and answered by our opinion.

The application for a rehearing is refused.

Rehearing refused.
Order entered June 9 , 2021

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01178

- CR

GEORGE GUO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial Di strict Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19

- 00090

- M

O RDER

Before the Court is the State’s June 4, 2021 second motion for an extension

of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief

,

received with the motion, fi led as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
H. R. 6042 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 213 William 

Hilton Parkway in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Caesar H. Wright 

Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CAESAR H. WRIGHT JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 213 William Hilton Parkway in Hilton Head 

Island, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 

‘‘Caesar H. Wright Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Caesar H. Wright Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenyong Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: September 26, 2011
By:
/s/Zhenyong LiuZhenyong Liu

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ W. Kirk BrassfieldW. Kirk BrassfieldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 15



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 24, 2000 on our review of interim
financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation (the "Corporation") as of and
for the period ended March 31, 2000 and included in the Corporation's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 and Form S-3 (Nos.
33-44380 and 333-36415), Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442,
33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362, 33-62648,
333-42231, and 333-52175) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-8 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061).


Very truly yours,




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
May 11, 2000
clgl_ex1020.htm


Exhibit 10.20


 


Strictly Private & Confidential


 


December 18, 2013


 


George Duggan


c/o Incorporated Communications Services


4515 Ocean View Blvd., Suite 305


La Canada, CA 91011







Re:            California Gold Corp. Settlement and Release Agreement


Dear George:


 


This letter is to acknowledge that (i) California Gold Corp. (the “Company”) has paid to you, Incorporated Communications Service (“ICS”), the sum of $6,234.64 in cash, as settlement in full (the “Settlement Payment”) of all obligations and fees owed to ICS by the Company under ICS invoice number 8768 (the “ICS Outstanding Invoice”) and under the ICS Services Agreement with the Company dated January 2, 2012 as renewed (the “ICS Agreement”) with respect to consulting services provided to the Company by ICS; (ii) having received the Settlement Payment by ICS, the Company is deemed by ICS to have paid and fully satisfied all debts and obligations to ICS with respect to the ICS Outstanding Invoice and the ICS Agreement; (iii) having received the Settlement Payment, the ICS Agreement is terminated as of the end of the August 2013; (iv) ICS agrees, having received the Settlement Payment, to completely release and forever discharge the Company (together with the Company’s present, future and former officers, directors, shareholders, partners, principals,  members, employees, agents, servants, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates or other representatives, heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns (collectively, the “Released Parties”)), of and from any and all past, present or future claims, demands, obligations, actions, causes of action, rights, damages, costs, loss of services, expenses and compensation which ICS now has, or which may hereafter accrue or otherwise be acquired by ICS, on account of, or in any way growing out or relating to the ICS Outstanding Invoice and the ICS Agreement; and (v) ICS agrees, having received the Settlement Payment, not to initiate or voluntarily participate in any legal action, charge or complaint against any of the Released Parties with respect to the ICS Outstanding Invoice or the ICS Agreement.







We thank you for your consideration.







Very truly yours,







California Gold Corp.


 

 


/s/ James D. Davidson


Name: James D. Davidson


Title: President


 

 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED to on this 18th day of December, 2013







Incorporated Communications Services







/s/ George Duggan


Name: George Duggan


Title: Managing Partner