alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENTS TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 

On April 28, 2014, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) extended the term of the employment agreement of each of the
following executive officers, as follows: 
  

					
	 	  	Term of Agreement Extended
	 Name and Title
	  	 From
	  	 To

			
	 David L. Berstein, Esq.

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief

Intellectual Property Counsel, and Secretary
	  	December 31, 2014	  	December 31, 2016
			
	 Daniel M. Bollag, Ph.D

Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality
	  	December 31, 2014	  	December 31, 2016
			
	 Maria E. Cantor
 Senior
Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Human
 Resources
	  	June 30, 2015	  	December 31, 2016
			
	 Timothy P. Clackson, Ph.D.

President of Research and Development and Chief

Scientific Officer
	  	June 30, 2015	  	December 31, 2016
			
	 Martin J. Duvall

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer
	  	December 31, 2014	  	December 31, 2016
			
	 Edward M. Fitzgerald

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and

Treasurer
	  	June 30, 2015	  	December 31, 2016
			
	 Frank G. Haluska, M.D., Ph.D.

Senior Vice President, Clinical Research and

Development and Chief Medical Officer
	  	December 31, 2014	  	December 31, 2016

 The term of employment for each officer is thereafter subject to automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice
to the contrary by either party, as provided in their employment agreements. 
 The terms of employment for each of Harvey J. Berger, M.D., Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, and Hugh M. Cole, Senior Vice President, Chief Business Officer, remain December 31, 2016, subject to automatic renewal as provided in their employment agreements.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ Tony L. White                                                                                                                                                            |   |   |  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--|
|  

 

 

Chief          Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:          May 9, 2006

 

 

 

  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029319
<NAME> ASSET RECOVERY & MANAGEMENT CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                       996
<INVENTORY>                                     48,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,168
<PP&E>                                          89,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,829)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 20, 2011

d0713 

# Order

July 20, 2011

142388 & (105)

YOLANDA JOHNSON, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate OF VERA JACKSON, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142388 COA: 293304 Wayne CC: 08-123817-NH DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, HARPERHUTZEL HOSPITAL, AN DRE R. NUNN, M.D., and DETROIT SURGICAL SPECIALISTS, P.C., d/b/a Detroit Bariatrics, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the December 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY , J., would grant leave to appeal.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

**Bonomble 1.**  Prodookl CoUfJtY AUditOr, @W6BtOa aOU?itY Gelve#ton,

Teur 

### Dearsir:

Your letter 0 43, m8ardlag the camtul ettentlon: d **to** pertlolpato

to
Thl8 errountle ration with the State aounty iieoltb

Tnft. ,100 for 8anltarlan, d WOO **for** all other

1, a oopy of rhioh ir lnoloe8d **t** while the Leglelat?rre &sC. CB~O e establirh@ent

of a heelth 

### unit

taln moh a unit. Likewins,ln OpinionSo. that LibertyCountywar authorized t0 aooopt int end expend money for the aalntumnoe of e publlahealth unit. The m a a o n8 f o r tie r o p inio n s l

pply aquallg aa well to Celreeton County.xononblo 1. Pmdookl, w 8

buildin&for the uw of the tani 1 t op u r eh6w

a a d npalr a , If l bunaing lr relad Boo*@- rrl by tha Coml~oloYra* Court, $r eontalaed ia Artiolo&351, Vemm*r Aaaoteted Clvll Statutes. W other thla&r, #la utlalo provide8

thnt’raoh

oomiaolo#r’I* court l !dlr
ja ll r vrolldo aad keep la n a n d l ll'#oorury pub1 r lr Oourthoun~, o baildingr. ” :iiwefora

bdtlre you that kln8ton County 18 authorisrd*:o purohau uWmPo&l l bulld~ly~tor tb w of tha countyEwalth ‘Jnft 

### lr tha Coml88loabrr* court en&o **8uoh** 8 buildln$

JLOO~8aary.'f'lw

purohaw mutt, oi oourn, be mda rma **tha proper**  tund **and** k la oorpllaao~ with tha Bud& br, Aatat~951,

4hd Leglrlatun, Chapter 806 gate 539~ Art10168 m GaBa-18,

vernon*~

AnJlotatod c1.h stlstut68.

Tour8 wry truly

TC-s:sP:fCP no1. APP8ObTE ogle; Cgalttr~

. . ., ChaIrma
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tony L. White,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Tony L. White      
|Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 8, 2007
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
 June 30,
    
    December 31,2005
    
    2004Short-term debt
    
    $
    30.3
    
    
    
    78.8Current portion of long-term debt
    
    
    43.6
    
    
    
    45.9Long-term debt
    
    
    970.3
    
    
    
    972.2Total debt
    
    
    1,044.2
    
    
    
    1,096.9Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    844.9
    
    
    
    555.1Shareholders equity
    
    
    5,399.9
    
    
    
    4,343.1Total capitalization
    
    $
    7,289.0
    
    
    
    5,995.1Ratio of total debt to total capitalization
    
    
    14.3
    %
    
    
    18.3
    %
Exhibit 4.1
 
 PARKER DRILLING COMPANY,
as the Issuer
 and
 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,
as Trustee
 
 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Dated as of October 26, 2010
 Supplementing the Indenture dated as of July 5, 2007
 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2012




---



##### 



SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Company Trustee
 RECITALS OF THE COMPANY AND THE GUARANTORS
 Guarantors Indenture Notes
     Certain Terms Defined in the Indenture
 Release of Subsidiary Guarantees of Guarantors
 Effectiveness




---



##### 



Supplemental Indenture Part of Indenture
 Trustee Makes No Representation
   Counterpart Originals
 Headings
 Governing Law
 Binding Effect
 -2-




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 PARKER DRILLING COMPANYBy:
    /s/ W. Kirk BrassfieldName:
    W. Kirk BrassfieldTitle:
    Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial OfficerTHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY,
N.A., as TrusteeBy:
    /s/ Julie Hoffman-RamosName:
    Julie Hoffman-RamosTitle:
    Senior Associate Signature Page  Second Supplemental Indenture to 2007 Indenture
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Gang Ma, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gang MaChief Financial Officer Date: August  14, 2008
#### Douglas ROADEN, Appellant, v. Jon DERMOTT, Dean Dankelson, Norm Rouse, George Thomas, Nick Marshall, Blake Wolf, W.J. Pierce, Appellees.

No. 02-3055.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted-Oct. 4, 2002.

Decided Nov. 8, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Roaden appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). After careful review of the complaint, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing it as frivolous.

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**(as of December 31, 2009)**

**List of Subsidiaries**

 

| **Subsidiaries**             | **State of Incorporation** |
|------------------------------|----------------------------|
| CPG International I Inc      | Delaware                   |
| AZEK Buildings Products Inc. | Delaware                   |
| Scranton Products Inc.       | Delaware                   |
| Santana Products Inc.        | Delaware                   |
| CPG Sub I Corporation        | Delaware                   |
| Vycom Corp.                  | Delaware                   |
| Sanatec Sub I Corporation    | Delaware                   |
| Procell Decking, Inc.        | Delaware                   |
| AZEK Canada Inc.             | Province of Ontario        |
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis M. Clarke, certify that: 

l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Independent BancShares, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

Date: March 28, 2008.
183 La. 455

#### DEBLIEUX v. TRAVELERS’ INS. CO. SAME v. TRAVELERS’ INS. CO.

Nos. 33499, 33500.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1935.

Barksdale, Bullock, Warren, Clark & Van Hook, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Stephens & Gahagan, of Natchitoches, for appellees.

ODOM, Justice.

These cases are consolidated for the purpose of this motion. We are asked to dismiss these appeals on the ground:

> “That the notes of evidence are incorrect in that the court reporter incorrectly took and incorrectly transcribed the testimony of witnesses, and particularly that of Dr. M. H. Phelps, as will be shown by his affidavit on file in the record in this cause. That this court can not pass on the merits of the cause unless the record was complete and correct and that if the testimony is not correctly shown in the record it is impossible for the court to properly determine the issues.”

At page 68 of the testimony, as transcribed and sent up by the court reporter, it appears that Dr. Phelps, a witness for plaintiff, was asked:

> “With the condition he (referring to the deceased, who was insured by defendant) was in with lukemia, there was no immediate prospect of death from that cause?”

According to the record Dr. Phelps answered :

> “I would not say there was no immediate prospect.”

Counsel for appellee say that the court reporter incorrectly took and transcribed Dr. Phelps’ answer; that Dr. Phelps said in answer to the above question:

> “I would say there was no immediate prospect.”

In support of their application, counsel attach the affidavit of Dr. Phelps, in which he says that the court reporter erred in transcribing his answer; that what he said in answer to the above question was this:

> “I would say there was no immediate prospect.”

Prior to the date on which this motion to dismiss was filed, appellee applied to this court for a writ of certiorari addressed to the clerk of court commanding him to “amend and complete the transcript of appeal filed in this case by correcting the testi*245mony of Dr. M. H. Phelps.” In their application for the writ they referred to the same testimony as that referred to in this motion to dismiss. Counsel for appellant filed written opposition to .the granting of the writ, alleging that the testimony was correctly reported. He supported his opposition by his own affidavit and the affidavit ■of a physician who was also a witness and heard the testimony of Dr. Phelps. These affidavits set out that Dr. Phelps’ testimony is reported exactly as he gave it.

We refused to grant the writ for the following reason:

> “Under these circumstances we have no authority to assume that the court stenographer did not perform his duty faithfully and correctly or to order him to change the record of the testimony.”

This is sufficient ground for refusing to dismiss these appeals. These motions to dismiss the appeals are denied.
#### John W. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 02-3383.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 30, 2002.

ORDER

The order of dismissal and the mandate dated October 29, 2002 having been issued in error, the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner’s brief is due within 60 days from the date of filing of this order.
|EXHIBIT 31.1                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                   
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|                                                                                                                   
|I, Demitro Marianovich,certify that:                                                                               
|                                                                                                                   
|1.                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                   
|2.                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                   
|3.                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                   
|4.                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|5.                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                   
|By /s/ Demitro MarianovichDemitro Marianovich
Chief Executive Officer,
April 7, 2011
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of Hollysys Automation
Technologies Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herriet Qu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2013 and results of operations
of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2013.



| | /s/ Herriet Qu |                                                              
| | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:          | Herriet Qu                                                   
| | Title:         | Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
| | Date:          | September 27, 2013                                           



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.