alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  February 7, 2006

/s/  Thomas A. Nardi
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2020

No. 04-19-00192-CR & 04-19-00193-CR

John Joe AVALOS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CR-7068, 2016-CR-10374

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s unopposed final motion to extend time to file a motion for panel and en banc 

rehearing is granted. We order the appellant’s motion for panel and en banc rehearing, if any, 

due August 10, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent 

a timely motion that: (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay; (2) 

advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the motion; and (3) provides 

the court reasonable assurance that the motion will be completed and filed by the requested 

extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy workload to be an 

extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of August, 2020.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean E. Belanger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Sean E. Belanger                           
|Sean E. Belanger                               
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: April 27, 2004
#### Louis Baldinger and Oscar Kupferman, Appellants, v. Henry Feldman and Thomas Maroselli, Respondents.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller JJ., concurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Soto, Appellant.

[678 NYS2d 9]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), rendered July 2, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, three counts of kidnapping in the first degree, conspiracy in the second degree and criminal impersonation in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 20 years to life on the murder conviction, 15 years to life on each of the kidnapping convictions, 6 to 12 years on the conspiracy conviction and IV2 to 3 years on the criminal impersonation conviction, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about June 18, 1997, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress statements was properly denied. Although the hearing court, in rendering its decision, failed to make findings of fact or conclusions of law, as required by CPL 710.60 (6), this Court has an adequate record upon which to make its own findings and conclusions with respect to defendant’s motion to suppress his written and videotaped statements *(see, People v Jones,*247 AD2d 272). The record establishes that defendant was asked only pedigree information when he first arrived at the precinct, which does not require *Miranda*warnings *(see, People v Rodney,*85 NY2d 289). He was not questioned for several hours, until the officers returned from the crime scene, where the victim’s body was recovered. Although the police then informed him that the body had been found and showed him photographs of the crime scene, defendant did not make any statements until after he waived his *Miranda*rights *(People v Tarleton,*184 AD2d 463, *lv denied*80 NY2d 910). The hearing evidence, viewed in totality, establishes that defendant’s waiver of his *Miranda*rights and his subsequent statements were knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made, and were not the product of coercion *(see, People v Anderson,*42 NY2d 35).

We reject defendant’s contentions concerning his meritless *360
      *pro se*petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We see no reason to deem this petition a further suppression motion raising an issue under *Payton v New York*(445 US 573). Were we to do so, we would find the motion to be untimely and facially insufficient. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Tom, JJ.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D. C.  20549



FORM 10-Q


Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the Quarter Ended March 31, 1997  Commission File No. 1-5591


                  PENNZOIL COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


             Delaware                          74-1597290
(State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)           Identification No.)


Pennzoil Place, P.O. Box 2967
Houston, Texas 77252-2967
(Address of principal executive offices)




EXHIBIT


<PAGE>





                        PENNZOIL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                 INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.
-----------

          3    Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Pennzoil Company,
               as amended through May 10, 1996.

         12    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the three
               months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996.

         27    Financial Data Schedule


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of CPG International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric K. Jungbluth, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| Date:   March 25, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ ERIC K. JUNGBLUTH                 |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                             |   |   | Eric K. Jungbluth                     |
|                             |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
**Exhibit        32(b)**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company,                Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  THOMAS A. NARDI |   |   | August                  9, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                            |

| /s/                  THOMAS A. NARDI |   |   | August                  9, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                            |

| /s/                  THOMAS A. NARDI |   |   | August                  9, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                            |
EXHIBIT 11

                   SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   (In thousands, except per share data)

                                 QUARTER ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                  May 3,   May 4,     May 3,   May 4,
                                 2003      2002      2003      2002
                               --------- -------- ---------- --------

NET EARNINGS
  Basic net earnings           $  10,541  $  9,074  $ 16,699  $ 13,936
  Add:  Distributions on
   Preferred Securities,
   net of tax                        516       512         -       512
                               ---------    ------   -------   -------

  Diluted net earnings         $  11,057  $  9,586  $ 16,699  $ 14,448
                               =========   =======   =======   =======

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
 OUTSTANDING
  Basic weighted average common
   shares outstanding             29,235    26,868    29,242    26,809
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed conversion of
   Preferred Stock                 1,637     1,637         -       818
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed exercise of options       230       554       242       511
                                --------  --------  --------  --------

  Diluted weighted average
   shares outstanding             31,102    29,059    29,484    28,138
                                ========  ========  ========  ========

NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Basic                         $    .36  $    .34  $    .57  $    .52
                                ========  ========  ========  ========
  Diluted                       $    .36  $    .33  $    .57  $    .51
                                ========  ========  ========  ========
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27.3

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH FLOWS AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298
<INVENTORY>                                     10,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,711
<PP&E>                                          17,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,726
<BONDS>                                         20,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,138
<OTHER-SE>                                    (68,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,894
<SALES>                                         17,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,044
<CGS>                                           14,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    99
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (39,405)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,842)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (7.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.68)
        

</TABLE>
#### Reuben W. Wright and David S. Wright, Respondents, v. Daniel F. Toomey and Charles J. Wirtner, Appellants, Impleaded with John S. Lambert.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**P & F INDUSTRIES,INC.****CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard A.Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard A. Horowitz      |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A.  Horowitz         |
| Principal  Executive Officer |
| May 17, 2004                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #15-2006 (B) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK                                        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Freddie M. Kotek                                            |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
| August 14, 2014                                             |
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
February 28, 2007 of Carlateral, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), I, Don Cameron, Chairman, President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: May 18,2007

/s/ DON CAMERON
___________________________________
    Don Cameron
    President, Secretary Treasurer,
    Principal Executive Officer,
    Principal Financial Officer and
    sole Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory ROSE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4791.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 26, 2003.

Decided March 13, 2003.

Thomas K Plofchan, Jr., Plofchan & Associates, Sterling, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Edic D. Edmondson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

A magistrate judge found Gregory Rose guilty of reckless driving pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 4.2 (2002) (assimilating Va.Code Ann. § 46.2-852 (2002)). The district court affirmed the magistrate judge’s judgment. On appeal, Rose contends: (1) the magistrate judge did not have jurisdiction; (2) the prosecution improperly withheld exculpatory and impeachment evidence; (3) the magistrate judge denied him the right to confront witnesses against him; and (4) the magistrate judge abused his discretion in granting a fifty-six day continuance. Rose also contends the cumulative effect of the errors violated his right to due process and equal protection. Finding no error, we affirm.

First, Rose waived review with regard to any alleged error concerning the notice of violation that was unsigned and unverified. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2); *United States v. Williams,*89 F.3d 165, 167 n. 1 (4th Cir.1996). Moreover, the regulation under which Rose was convicted had the force and effect of law. *See United States v. Fox,*60 F.3d 181, 184 (4th Cir.1995). Because Rose did not face a sentence longer than six months’ imprisonment, the magistrate judge had jurisdiction to hear the case without a jury. *See*Fed. R.Crim.P. 58(b)(2)(E)(i); *Lewis v. United States,*518 U.S. 322, 325-27, 116 S.Ct. 2163,135 L.Ed.2d 590 (1996).

Second, the Government did not improperly withhold any exculpatory or impeachment evidence. Nor did the Government fail to fulfill its obligation under *Jencks v.*
      *586
      *United States,*353 U.S. 657, 667-72, 77 S.Ct. 1007, 1 L.Ed.2d 1103 (1957), and the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (2000).

Third, the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in admitting the tape recording of a telephone call and did not violate Rose’s right to confront witnesses against him. *United States v. Bostian,*59 F.3d 474, 480 (4th Cir.1995) (stating standard of review). Nor did the magistrate judge abuse his discretion in continuing the trial for approximately fifty-eight days. *United States v. Sampson,*140 F.3d 585, 591 (4th Cir.1998). Finally, given that the magistrate judge did not err, Rose’s claim that the cumulative effect of the errors denied him his due process and equal protection rights is without merit.

We affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*