alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 33.14

    Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Year End
    December 31, 2006 of SunTrust Bank, Inc. as Vendor for SunTrust Mortgage,
                                Inc., as Servicer


                      MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE
                           WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

                                February 26, 2007

     SunTrust  Bank  (the  "Asserting   Party")  is  responsible  for  assessing
compliance  with  the  servicing   criteria  set  forth  in  Title  17,  Section
229.1122(d)(2)(i),  229.1122(d)(4)(i)  and  229.1122(d)(4)(ii)  of the  Code  of
Federal  Regulations  (the "CFR") (the  "Applicable  Servicing  Criteria"),  for
securitization  transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after
December  31,  2005  (the  "Platform").  The  Asserting  Party is not  assessing
compliance with any other criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

     The Asserting Party used the applicable  criteria in paragraph (d) of Title
17,  Section  229.1122  of the CFR to  assess  compliance  with  the  Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

     The  Asserting  Party has concluded  that is has complied,  in all material
respects,  with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month
period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period").

     PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP, an independent  registered  public  accounting
firm, has issued an attestation  report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  for the  Reporting  Period as set forth in this
assertion.


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Sections 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)


By: /s/  Rosealma T. Burton    2/26/07
----------------------------
Name:   Rosealma T. Burton
Title:   First Vice President


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i)

By: /s/ Tomas E. Suarez        2/26/07
-----------------------
Name:    Tomas E. Suarez
Title:   Vice President
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Winston C. Yen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: March 23,2011
By:
/s/Winston C. YenWinston C. Yen

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer )
#### DELTATRAK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONITOR TEMPERATURE RECORDING CO., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1287.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 12, 2002.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<table>

EXHIBIT 12.1
PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in millions)
<caption>

                                                                                     Three
                                                                                    months
                                                                                     ended
                                                                                  March 31,
                                1997       1998       1999       2000       2001      2002
                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------  ---------

                          <c>        <c>        <c>        <c>        <c>        <c>
Fixed Charges:

Interest                        $ 91       $ 84       $ 82       $ 72       $ 88       $ 18
Interest portion of
  annual rentals                  12         11          3          4          3          -
Preferred dividends
  of subsidiaries (1)             13          2          2          2          2          -
                            --------   --------   --------   --------   --------  ---------
Combined Fixed Charges and
  Preferred Stock Dividends
  for Purpose of Ratio          $116       $ 97       $ 87       $ 78       $ 93       $ 18
                            ========   ========   ========   ========   ========  =========

Earnings:

Pretax income from
  continuing operations         $335       $274       $350       $396      $377        $103
Add Total Fixed Charges
  (from above)                   116         97         87         78        93          18
                            --------   --------   --------   --------   -------   ---------
Total Earnings for
  Purpose of Ratio              $451       $371       $437       $474      $470        $121
                            ========   ========   ========   ========   =======  ==========
Ratio of Earnings
  to Combined Fixed Charges
  and Preferred Stock
  Dividends                     3.89       3.82       5.02       6.08      5.05        6.72
                            ========   ========   ========   ========   =======  ==========

(1) In computing this ratio, "Preferred dividends of subsidiaries" represents the
before-tax earnings necessary to pay such dividends, computed at the effective tax
rates for the applicable periods.

</table>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6320 

To double the existing penalties for the provision of misleading or inaccurate 

caller identification information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. LAMB) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To double the existing penalties for the provision of 

misleading or inaccurate caller identification information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Spoofing Pen5 alties Modernization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASING PENALTIES FOR SPOOFERS. 

7 Section 227(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 

8 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6320 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$20,000’’; and 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘$2,000,000’’; and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99-B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin
G. Moug, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

| |                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Kevin G. Moug                                 
| |                                                   
| | Kevin G. Moug                                     
| | Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Otter Tail Corporation and will be retained by Otter Tail
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ FRANKLIN R. PERKINS , Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD , Respondent.

__________________________
2013

- 3074

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA315I120162 -I- 1.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R
Franklin R. Perkins moves to compel the agency to “preserve all relevant documentation” and “to make it available for review by the employee or his or her representative.” To the extent that Mr. Perkins is arguing the merits of his case, those arguments belong in his brief not in a m otion. Accordingly, Case: 13-3074 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 08/14/2013FRANKLIN PERKINS V

. MSPB 2

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion to compel is denied.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s21 Case: 13-3074 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 08/14/2013
#### Cathy CLEMENS, debtor, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Bette RASCO, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 01-16664.

D.C. No. CV-00-01868-RCB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 2002.

Decided Nov. 14, 2002.

Before KLEINFELD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and REA, District Judge.*

The Honorable William J. Rea, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

The district court did not clearly err in determining that Cathy Clemens (“Clemens”) filed the bankruptcy action in her individual capacity, and not in her capacity as representative for the estate of Louise Raynesford or trustee of the Raynesford Trust. *See Scott v. Boos,*215 F.3d 940, 943 (9th Cir.2000). The Voluntary Petition was signed by Clemens individually, and did not purport to be on behalf of the Raynesford Estate or Trust. Because the malpractice action against Rasco does not “relate to” Clemens’ bankruptcy action, the district court properly found that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the adversary proceeding. *See Mann v. Alex.*
      *867
      *Dawson, Inc. (In re Mann),*907 F.2d 923, 926 n. 4 (9th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GREG AYO DAFINONE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50374

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00372-JHN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Jacqueline H. Nguyen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Greg Ayo Dafinone appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

JUN 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-50374

The government contends that the appeal is barred by an appeal waiver. We

decline to dismiss on the basis of the appeal waiver. See United States v. Jacobo

Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc).

Dafinone contends that the district court erred in imposing a 14-level

sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(H) because its loss

calculation was not supported by the evidence. The parties dispute whether the

government was required to prove the facts supporting the enhancement by a

preponderance of the evidence or by a clear and convincing evidence standard. We

need not resolve this issue, because there was no factual dispute as to the actual

losses suffered by the victim banks. Moreover, the district court did not err in

finding that Dafinone was part of a common fraudulent scheme, and attributing all

losses occasioned by the scheme to him. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (specific

offense characteristic determined on basis of all reasonably foreseeable acts

undertaken by participants in a joint criminal activity in furtherance of that

activity); United States v. Showalter, 569 F.3d 1150, 1159 (9th Cir. 2009) (district

court’s factual findings supporting a sentence enhancement are reviewed for clear

error). 

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 26, 2023 No. 04-22-00778-CR EX PARTE Hernan Hernandez RUBIO From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12252CR Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On January 25, 2023, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting a thirty-day extension of time to file his reply brief. After consideration, we grantthe motion and order appellant to file his reply by March 1, 2023. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
It is so ORDERED on January 26, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Dwight BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4321.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 24, 2002.

Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

Kenneth W. Ravenell, Schulman, Treem, Kaminkow, Gilden & Ravenell, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Michael Dwight Brown appeals his conviction and 360 month sentence for distributing 500 or more grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000).

First, Brown argues that the district court erred in dismissing his motion to suppress evidence seized from his residence. We review a district court’s legal *149conclusions on a suppression motion de novo and the court’s underlying factual determinations for clear error. *United States v. Seidman,*156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir.1998). Brown’s claim is meritless. The search warrant application established probable cause to search Brown’s residence. See *United States v. Williams,*974 F.2d 480, 481-82 (4th Cir.1992); *United States v. Corral,*970 F.2d 719, 728 (10th Cir.1992); *United States v. Anderson,*851 F.2d 727, 729 (4th Cir.1988).

Second, Brown argues that the jury instructions issued by the district court were prejudicial. We review Brown’s challenge to the jury instructions for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Whittington,*26 F.3d 456, 462 (4th Cir.1994). This claim is meritless as well. The jury instructions were an accurate reflection of the applicable law and did not prejudice Brown’s defense. See *United States v. Lewis,*53 F.3d 29, 32 (4th Cir.1995); *United States v. Cobb,*905 F.2d 784, 788-89 (4th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm Brown’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### DESIGNING HEALTH, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, and Bernard Collett and Robert Macintosh Collett, Plaintiffs/Third Party Defendants-Cross Appellants, and Collett Veterinary Clinic, INC. and Collett Family Trust, Third Party Defendants-Appellees, v. Udo ERASMUS, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Flora, Inc., Flora Manufacturing and Distributing, Ltd., Thomas Greither, and Gabriel Lightfriend, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 03-1438, 03-1439, 03-1440, 03-1441, 03-1442, 03-1443, 03-1457.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 4, 2003.

ORDER

Appellant having paid the required filing fee, it is ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P. and
      John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III on Form 10-K for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, we, John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer, and Paul E.
      Muellner, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:

            1.    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operation of John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P. and
                  John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P. and John Q. Hammons Hotels
      Finance Corporation III and will be retained by John Q. Hammons Hotels,
      L.P. and John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III and furnished to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

Dated:  March 31, 2005

                              /s/ John Q. Hammons
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer
                              John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III and
                              John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc., general partner of
                              John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.

                              /s/ Paul E. Muellner
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Paul E. Muellner, Chief Financial Officer
                              John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III and
                              John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc., general partner of
                              John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commercial Property
Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Quarterly Report"), we, David C. Merrell, President and Kristine M.
Rogers, Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 09/01/2006                         /s/David C. Merrell
       ----------                         -------------------------
                                          David C. Merrell
                                          President and Director


Dated: 09/01/2006                         /s/Kristine M. Rogers
       ----------                         -------------------------
                                          Kristine M. Rogers
                                          Secretary and Treasurer
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

September 8, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00257

- CV

Michael SHANNON, Director of Development Services Department, City of San Antonio, Texas; and City of S an Antonio, Texas,

Appellants

v.

Arlene W. BLAIR and Plaintiff Class Petitioners,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 23022 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was originally due August 16, 2021. We granted appellants’ first motion for extension of time, extending the deadline for filing the brief to September 16, 2021. On September 7, 2021, appellants filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until October 18, 2021, for a total extension of 60 days. Aft er consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants to file their brief by October 18, 2021

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of September, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EX-4.1




 EXHIBIT 4.1 
  

			
	Number	 	Shares
		
	    -0-	 	-0-   
		
	 	 	CUSIP              


FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. 

a Delaware corporation 

FNF Group Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share 

This Certifies that ______________________________ is the owner of _______ FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF FNF GROUP COMMON
STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.0001 PER SHARE, OF FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of
this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
 In Witness
Whereof, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. 

DATED: ______________________ 
  

																	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 	
		 	  
	 		 		 		 		 	  
	 		 	
		 	CORPORATE SECRETARY	 		 		 		 		 	CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER