alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 15, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00028

- CV

Kent LINDUFF,

Appellant

v.

Lisa Ann ROBERTS aka Lisa Ann Bays,

Appellee s

From the 216th Judicial Distr ict Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 310

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The District Clerk’s Notification of Late Record is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended

to March 29, 2019.

_________________________________ Sande e Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of February, 2019

.

_________________________ __________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
##### 



ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE
SERVICING CRITERIA
   Platform
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
  
    
    The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




---



##### 



The Bank of New York
    
    The Bank of New YorkThe Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.
    
    The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.The Bank of New York (Delaware)/s/ Robert L. Griffin
    
    /s/ Patrick J. TadieRobert L. Griffin
    
    Patrick J. TadieAuthorized Signor
    
    Authorized Signor
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ma y 10 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk Ma y 10 , 2019

157812 (76 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 157812

v COA: 334024

Wa yne CC: 15

- 010216

- FC

ARTHUR LAROME JEMISON

,

Defendant

- Appell ant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the second motion of defendant

- appellant to extend

the time for filing his brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before June 19 , 2019

.
Exhibit 10(f)

Contract No. 113419

 

NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA (Natural)

TRANSPORTATION RATE SCHEDULE FTS

AMENDMENT NO. 3 DATED April 5, 2000

TO AGREEMENT DATED January 15, 1998 (Agreement)

 

1.	[ ] Exhibit A dated April 5, 2000. Changes Primary Receipt Point(s)/Secondary Receipt Point(s) and Point MDQ's. This Exhibit A replaces any previously dated Exhibit A.

2.	[ ] Exhibit B dated April 5, 2000. Changes Primary Delivery Point(s)/Secondary Delivery Point(s) and Point MDQ's. This Exhibit B replaces any previously dated Exhibit B.

3.	[X] Exhibits A and B dated April 5, 2000. Changes Primary Receipt and Delivery Points/Secondary Receipt and Delivery Points. These Exhibits A and B replace any previously dated Exhibits A and B.

4.	[X] Exhibit C dated April 5, 2000. Changes the Agreement's Path. This Exhibit C replaces any previously dated Exhibit C.

5.	[X] Revise Agreement MDQ: [X] Increase [ ] Decrease
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Sean P. McGrathName:
    
    Sean P. McGrathTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    March 30, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6339 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6339

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the health 
                          coverage tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2021

Mr. Turner (for himself and Mr. Golden) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the health 
                          coverage tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Coverage Tax Credit 
Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF HEALTH COVERAGE TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 35(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``before January 1, 2022'' and inserting 
``before January 1, 2026''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
IB 

Union Calendar No. 378 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6364 

[Report No. 117–503] 

To amend the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Improvement 

Act to extend the exception to the closure of certain roads within the 

Recreation Area for local businesses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself, Mr. MEUSER, and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6364 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation 

Area Improvement Act to extend the exception to the 

closure of certain roads within the Recreation Area for 

local businesses, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6364 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CERTAIN ROADS WITHIN THE DELA4 WARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION 

5 AREA. 

6 Section 4(b) of the Delaware Water Gap National 

7 Recreation Area Improvement Act (Public Law 109–156; 

8 119 Stat. 2948) is amended in the matter preceding para9 graph (1), by striking ‘‘Until’’ and all that follows through 

10 ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘Until September 30, 

11 2026, subsection (a)’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 378 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6364 

[Report No. 117–503] 

A BILL 

To amend the Delaware Water Gap National 

other purposes. the Recreation Area for local businesses, and for exception to the closure of certain roads within Recreation Area Improvement Act to extend the 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Tony L. White     Chief Executive Officer

Date:      November 12, 2003

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6158 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6158

To require a study on the challenges posed by the emergence of militia 
         fleets in the South China Sea, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2021

Mrs. Luria (for herself and Mr. Chabot) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a study on the challenges posed by the emergence of militia 
         fleets in the South China Sea, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Countering the People's Republic of 
China Maritime Militia Fleet Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STUDY ON THE EMERGENCE OF MILITIA FLEETS 
              IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a study on the 
challenges posed by the emergence of militia fleets in the South China 
Sea, including--
            (1) a tactical threat assessment and assessment of United 
        States Navy and Coast Guard capability;
            (2) options for countering militia fleets; and
            (3) an assessment of future capabilities needed to address 
        those challenges.
    (b) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on 
Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Armed Services of the Senate a report on the study conducted pursuant 
to subsection (a).
    (c) Militia Fleet.--In this section, the term ``militia fleet'' 
means the People's Armed Forces Maritime Militia or other subset 
national militias of China.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
      Baily, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
              Scott BailyScott
              BailyPrincipal
              Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2008
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-95361, 333-33986, 333-37630, 333-45818, 333-49628, 333-59346,
333-63514, 333-99559, 333-99673, 333-106420, 333-110729, 333-112611, 333-124959,
333-124961, 333-128497 and 333-129713), and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74197, 333-86728
and 333-124960) of our report dated April 15, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Arotech Corporation appearing in this Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
   /s/ BDO Seidman, LLPBDO
      Seidman, LLP
 
  Grand
Rapids, Michigan
 April 14,
2008
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Richard A. Horowitz, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P & F Industries, Inc.

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| August 16, 2004 |                           |   | /s/ Richard A. Horowitz |   |
|----------------------|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date                 | Richard A.  Horowitz           |   |
|                 | *Principal  Executive Officer* |   |

 

1

----
#### Heigel *v.*Heigel.

(No. 23414

Decided June 1, 1932.)

*Mr. Edwin J. Lynch,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Frank A. Garabin*and *Miss Mary Gillen,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority of *Craig*v. *Welply,*104 Ohio St., 312, and *Wells, Jr.,*v. *Wells,*105 Ohio St., 471.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ivecon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay D. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Jay D. Solomon

--------------------------------

JAY D. SOLOMON

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

World Energy Solutions, Inc.



March 30, 2007
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Paradise, Inc. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Melvin S. Gordon                 |   |   | Date: May 16, 2011 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|
| Melvin S. Gordon                     |   |   |               |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |   |   |               |   |

----
#### LOTZ v. POLIZZOTTO. LOTZ v. POLIZZOTTO et al.

Nos. 1460, 1461.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1935.

For former opinion, see 161 So. 901.

LE BLANC, Judge.

The principal complaint in the application for a rehearing herein is that in the concurring opinion, the report of the handwriting expert which bears a filing mark of the same date as that on which the re-conventional demand was being tried, was presumed to have been offered in evidence, when, as a matter of fact, the filing mark of the clerk does not show that it was filed ■“in evidence.”

The circumstances under which we presumed that the report was in evidence are fully set out in the concurring opinion, and it is unnecessary to repeat them here. We believe that the presumption indulged in under those circumstances is far more reasonable than would be one that the filing of the report had been stealthily or surreptitiously procured by counsel for defendant, the only other way in which it could have found its place in the record. Knowing these attorneys as we do we hesitate not to state that we do not for a moment believe that they would lend themselves to any such practice.

Aside from all of this, however, the fact remains that the expert called on to examine the questioned documents in these cases, after having made a scientific investigation, “stated the results thereof” as he had to under the provisions of the expert witness act (Act No. 19 of 1884) in order to receive additional compensation; his statement being in the form of the very comprehensive report found in the record. We took time to read this report in full, and so persuasive did we find it that we were led to say, in the main opinion, that we thought it safe to presume that the expert, “by his work, contributed to the discontinuance” of these two suits by the plaintiff. In effect, the report had Helped to bring about a tacit admission on the part of the plaintiff that the notes on which these suits were predicated, were forged instruments, and we believe that indirectly therefore, if not directly, it had a controlling influence over the district judge in so declaring them on the trial of defendant’s reconventional demand.

We find no merit in the applications for rehearing, and they both will be refused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>

                                                                      Exhibit 27

        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
        SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000077385
<NAME>  PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,503,437
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   110,324
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        363,030
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       23,659
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 57,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,057,795
<COMMON>                                      296,681
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           492,292
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                788,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          521,734
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 75,540
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                671,548
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               2,057,795
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   1,022,503
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    857,590
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    857,590
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       164,913
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             17,724
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                182,637
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       29,587
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           56,606
<NET-INCOME>                                   96,444
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  96,444
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       51,410
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      26,464
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        218,306
<EPS-BASIC>                                    2.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.72



</TABLE>