alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. P. BAUCUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARRETT MERCANTILE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.*

No. 5390.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 1, 1937.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1937.

Writ of Certiorari and Review Granted June 21, 1937.

Ralph W. Baucum, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Seals & Atkins, of Homer, for appel-lees.

*

 Judgment reversed by Supreme Court 178 So. 261.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case to suit No. 5391, styled Baucum & Kimball v. Garrett Mercantile Company et al., 177 So. 266, decided by us this day.

The only difference is that the cotton involved in this suit was bought by W. P. Baucum, instead of Baucum & Kimball, and in the number of bales purchased. The two cases were consolidated for trial below and also in this court. They were tried on the same note of evidence and the same defense is applicable to both.

For the reasons assigned in suit No. 5391, the judgment of the lower court in this case is affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis L. Winger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dennis L. Winger          Chief Financial OfficerDate: February 7, 2006

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6364 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6364

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Improvement 
Act to extend the exception to the closure of certain roads within the 
     Recreation Area for local businesses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF CERTAIN ROADS WITHIN THE DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL 
              RECREATION AREA.

    Section 4(b) of the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area 
Improvement Act (Public Law 109-156; 119 Stat. 2948) is amended in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``Until'' and all that 
follows through ``subsection (a)'' and inserting ``Until September 30, 
2026, subsection (a)''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6364

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Improvement 
Act to extend the exception to the closure of certain roads within the 
     Recreation Area for local businesses, and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 23.2




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVE ENGINEERS AND
GEOLOGISTS




As independent reserve engineers, geologists,
and geophysicists, we hereby consent to the references to our Firm’s name and
our Firm’s reserve report dated January 20, 2010 on the oil and natural gas
reserves of Legacy Reserve LP as of December 31, 2009 in Legacy Reserves LP’s
annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on Form 10-K and in
Legacy Reserves LP’s registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-144586) and on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-149251 and 333-150111) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.




LAROCHE PETROLEUM
CONSULTANTS, LTD.




By:
            /s/ Joe A. YoungName: Joe A. YoungTitle: Senior PartnerMarch 5,
2010


---
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000102303-MAY-201308:48 AM
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-29892 

18-MAY-2011 

10:40 AM 

SCWC-29892
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU,


Respondent/Plaintiff/Appellee,
 

vs.
 

JAMES M. SMITH and ROBERT H. LEE,


Petitioners/Defendants/Appellants.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CIVIL NO. 08-1-0192)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 1
 (By: McKenna, J., for the court )


The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on
 

April 12, 2011 by James M. Smith and Robert H. Lee,
 

Petitioners/Defendants/Appellants, is hereby rejected. 


1 Considered by: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba and McKenna JJ., and Circuit


Judge Lee, in place of Rectenwald, C.J., recused, and Circuit Judge Nishimura, in


place of Duffy, J., recused. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 18, 2011. 

FOR THE COURT:
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

Associate Justice
 

Of Counsel:
 

MEHEULA & DEVENS, LLP


VLADIMIR DEVENS
 

WILLIAM MEHEULA
 

AITCHISON & VICK, INC.


WILLIAM AITCHISON (Pro Hac Vice)


Attorneys for Petitioners/Defendants/Appellants


JAMES M. SMITH and ROBERT H. LEE
|            |
|-----------------|
| Exhibit      32 |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   |                        |   | /s/      Edsel R. Burns      |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  | December      23, 2009 |   | Edsel      R. Burns          |   |
|   |                   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   |                   |   |                         |   |
|   |                   |   | /s/      Larry A. Blount     |   |
| Date:  | December      23, 2009 |   | Larry      A. Blount         |   |
|   |                   |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
Exhibit 32.4

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

May 2, 2006

/S/  Steven D. Davis
Steven D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6**  **347**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
HENRY CHESTER , a/k/a Zeke , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 4:94

- cr - 00665

- CMC

- 1 )

Submitted : April 1 8, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY , and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Henry Chester , Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr. , Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Henry Chester appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his

sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Chester , No. 4:94

- cr - 00665

-
CMC

- 1 (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### John BECKA, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. APCOA/STANDARD PARKING, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant— Appellee.

No. 01-56207.

D.C. No. CV 00-00190 AHS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted on Nov. 6, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Before PREGERSON, NOONAN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiff-Appellant John Becka brought an action under Cal. Gov’t Code § 12941 alleging that he was discriminated against on the basis of his age by DefendantAppellee APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. Defendant moved for summary judgment, and the district court, holding that the plaintiff failed to make out a *prima facie*case of discrimination under *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), granted the motion. The district court also grant*885ed summary judgment on the Plaintiffs breach of oral contract claim because the claim was barred by the parol evidence rule. *See Becka v. APCOAfStandard Parking, Inc.,*146 F.Supp.2d 1109 (C.D.Cal.2001).

Plaintiff-Appellant here appeals the grant of summary judgment on both claims. We have reviewed Plaintiff-Appellant’s claim for age discrimination and have concluded that he did not produce sufficient direct or indirect evidence to present a triable issue of fact for a jury. We have also reviewed his breach of oral contract claim and find that it is barred by the parol evidence rule, Cal.Code Civ. Proc. § 1856.

AFFIRMED. Each side to bear its own costs.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 33.8

           Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria
                         for Year End December 31, 2006
             of American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., as Servicer




American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.'s
Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria

The undersigned has caused an assessment to be made of the servicer's compliance
with the servicing criteria set forth in Regulation AB.

American Home Mortgage  Servicing,  Inc. (the "Asserting  Party") is responsible
for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January
1,  2006 to  December  31,  2006 (the  "Reporting  Period")  with the  servicing
criteria  set  forth in Title 17,  Section  229.1122(d)  of the Code of  Federal
Regulations    (the   "CFR"),    except   for   those   portions   of   criteria
229.1122(d)(3)(ii)-  pertaining  to amounts due to investors  are  allocated and
remitted in accordance with  distribution  priority and other terms as set forth
in the transaction  agreements,  which the Asserting Party has concluded are not
applicable  to  the  servicing  activities  it  performs  with  respect  to  the
asset-backed  securities  transactions  covered by this report (the  "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). The Asserting Party has engaged vendors to perform certain
portions of criteria  1122(d)(4)(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(xi) for which it has elected
to take  responsibility.  The Platform  includes all residential  mortgage loans
serviced by the asserting party (the "Platform").

The Asserting  Party has assessed its compliance  with the Applicable  Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting  Period and has concluded
that the  Asserting  Party has  complied,  in all  material  respects,  with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent  registered  public  accounting  firm, has
issued an attestation report on the undersigned's  assessment of compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.



Date:  March 1, 2007        American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

                            By /s/ Michael Strauss
                            ----------------------
                            Michael Strauss
                            Chief Executive Officer

                            By /s/ Steve Hozie
                            ----------------------
                            Steve Hozie
                            Chief Financial Officer

                            By /s/ David Friedman
                            ----------------------
                            David Friedman
                            Executive Vice President
**Exhibit 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Michael S. Herring, certify that:     1.     I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Omniture, Inc. (the “Registrant”);     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other    financial information included in this report, fairly present in    all material respects the financial condition, results of    operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the    periods presented in this report;     4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))for    the Registrant and have:      (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the    Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during    the period in which this report is being prepared;      (b)      Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in    accordance with generally accepted accounting    principles; and      (c)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure    controls and procedures and presented in this report our    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this    report based on such evaluation; and     5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):      (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and      (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or    other employees who have a significant role in the    Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: March 23, 2007     By:     /s/  Michael    S. Herring
Exhibit 8.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF HOLLYSYS AUTOMATION
TECHNOLOGIES LTD.



|Subsidiaries                                                 |  | Jurisdiction of
        Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Hollsys International Pte. Limited                           |  | Singapore                            
|Hollysys (Asia Pacific) Pte. Limited                         |  | Singapore                            
|Gifted Time Holdings Limited                                 |  | British Virgin Islands               
|Clear Mind Limited                                           |  | British Virgin Islands               
|World Hope Enterprises Limited                               |  | Hong Kong                            
|Concord Solution (HK) Limited                                |  | Hong Kong                            
|Beijing Helitong Science &Technology Exploration Co., Ltd.   |  | PRC                                  
|Beijing Hollysys Group Co., Ltd.                             |  | PRC                                  
|Beijing Hollysys Automation & Drive Co., Ltd.                |  | PRC                                  
|Beijing Hollysys Co., Ltd.                                   |  | PRC                                  
|Hangzhou Hollysys Automation Co., Ltd.                       |  | PRC                                  
|Hangzhou Hollysys System Engineering Co., Ltd.               |  | PRC                                  
|Beijing Hollysys Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.            |  | PRC                                  
|Beijing Hollycon Medicine & Technology Co., Ltd.             |  | PRC                                  
|Beijing Haotong Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. |  | PRC                                  
|Hollysys (Beijing) Investment Co., Ltd.                      |  | PRC                                  
|Xi’an Hollysys Co., Ltd.                                     |  | PRC                                  
|Concord Electrical Pte. Ltd.                                 |  | Singapore                            
|Concord Corporation Pte. Ltd.                                |  | Singapore                            
|Concord Electrical Sdn. Bhd.                                 |  | Malaysia                             
|Concord M Design and Engineering Company Limited             |  | Macau                                
|Bond Corporation Pte. Ltd	.                                  |  | Singapore                            
|Bond M&E Pte. Ltd.                                           |  | Singapore                            
|Bond M&E Sdn. Bhd.                                           |  | Malaysia                             
|Bond M&E (K.L.) Sdn. Bhd.                                    |  | Malaysia
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0540

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM E. HAWKES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2023

07/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0540
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029387
   <NAME>  Jennifer Loomis & Associates Inc.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
18371.

#### Atlanta Band Mill, Inc. *v.*Choctaw Lumber Company.

Argued October 14, 1953

Decided November 9, 1953.

*Adair & Goldthwaite,*for plaintiff in error.

*~T. M. Smith, Jr., Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lóckerman,*contra.

Hawkins, Justice.

Upon careful examination of the record and mature consideration of the question presented, we.have reached the.conclusion that the certiorari was improvidently granted, and it is accordingly dismissed.

*Writ of certiorari dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., not participating.*