alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermaine Lamont WOOD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7316.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Jermaine Lamont Wood, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Lamont Wood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Wood,*Nos. CR-99-144; CA-01-847-3 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7813

JACK ZIMMERMAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN ANDREWS; TERRY KILPATRICK; DR. PATRICK CRAFT; UNITED 

STATES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 19-7814

JACK ZIMMERMAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN ANDREWS; TERRY KILPATRICK; DR. PATRICK CRAFT; UNITED 

STATES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03167-D)

Submitted: July 20, 2020 Decided: August 13, 2020
2

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Zimmerman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Jack Zimmerman seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Zimmerman’s claims under the 

Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346, 2671-80 (2018), dismissing in part his 

claims filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 

403 U.S. 388 (1971), denying his motions challenging the disposition of his motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and denying reconsideration. 

This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). An 

order denying “a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is an appealable [interlocutory] 

order.” Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Court, 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (per curiam). 

On appeal, Zimmerman challenges only the court’s denial of his claims related to 

the disposition of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon review, we affirm in part 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Zimmerman v. Andrews, No. 5:18-ct-03167-D 

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2019; Nov. 22, 2019). The remaining portions of the orders appealed 

are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal in part for lack of jurisdiction. 
4

We deny Zimmerman’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, 

DISMISSED IN PART
#### INTERNATIONAL MICROCELL, dba Netwaves Wireless, Plaintiff— Appellee, v. INTOUCH WIRELESS, INC., dba Icomm Solutions, Defendant— Appellant.

No. 02-55126.

D.C. No. CV-01-07222-MMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 4, 2002.*

Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

Before PREGERSON, NOONAN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER **

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The motion to dismiss is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 or the collateral order doctrine. *Lauro Lines S.R.L. v. Chasser,*490 U.S. 495, 500-01, 109 S.Ct. 1976, 104 L.Ed.2d 548 (1989).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-146197 on Form S-3 of our reports dated
March 13, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. and subsidiaries, formerly MainLine L.P. and subsidiaries, (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, "Employers' Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)," as of December 31, 2006), and the effectiveness of
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
for the year ended December 31, 2007.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Tony L. White      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: February 8, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE MINOR COURT 

RULES COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

NO. 432

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2019, Magisterial District Judge Beth 

Scagline-Mills, Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor Court 

Rules Committee for a term expiring October 1, 2024.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.8


 


Amendment


PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


 


On the Page 2 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement signed on August 22, 2013 between Royal Bakery Sourcing and Trading Corp., with its registered office at 405 Old County Road, Belmont, California (“Purchaser”) and Majestic Production of Peninsula, LLC with its registered office at 407 Old County Road, Belmont, California (“Producer”), which was effective on September 1, 2013.


 


PRICING


 


All products shall be five percent (5%) less than the regular standard selling price the Producer sale to other buyers in Producer's ordinary course of business. To maintain this wholesaler discount of five percent, the Purchaser agreed to purchase no less than $500,000 of products from Producers during the initial year, $750,000 the second year, $1,000,000 the third year and thereafter to the end of this Agreement.”


 


Both Purchaser and Producer understood the above “PRICE” terms are not-binding. Neither Purchase nor Product will have any financial obligations or liabilities if the purchase amount does not meet at any single year.


 


In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of this 20 day of March, 2014.


 




	Royal Bakery Sourcing and Trading Corp.  	 	 	Majestic Production of Peninsula, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Nikki Ma	 	 	/s/ Stephen Wan	 
	By: Nikki Ma	 	 	
By: Stephen Wan, CFO of

	 
	
Position: SECRETARY

	 	 	Egg Tart Cafe United Management Inc.	 
	 	 	 	
It's Managing Member
|                A.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                B.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April 15, 2010 | By:                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |           |                                                                                                                                  |
|   |           | /s/ R. Scott Horner                    |
|   |           | R. Scott Horner, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                              |
|   |           |                                                                                                                                  |
|   |           |                                                                                                                                  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ended  November  30,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory
Adams,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 23, 2007


By:      /s/ Gregory Adams
         -----------------
         Gregory Adams
         Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal
         accounting officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>

                                                                      Exhibit 27

        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
        SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000077388
<NAME>  THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,268,188
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     8,782
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        285,113
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       17,687
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 38,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,618,035
<COMMON>                                      165,307
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           455,129
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                620,436
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          452,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                    700
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                544,899
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               1,618,035
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     744,247
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    603,881
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    603,881
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       140,366
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             17,639
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                158,005
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       25,534
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           48,890
<NET-INCOME>                                   83,581
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  83,581
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       44,175
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      22,908
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        184,751
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>
(Nos. 22856, 22857.

#### The People *ex rel.*John S. Rusch, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Lina Singer *et al.*Plaintiffs in Error.

*Opinion filed October 14, 1936*

Rehearing *denied Dec. 2, 1936.*

*481Northup & Beardsley, for plaintiffs in error.

Otto Kerner, Attorney General, (J. J. Neiger, and John F. Cashen, Jr., of counsel,) for defendant in error.

Mr. Chief Justice Herrick

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendants, Lina W. Singer and Florence Arieu, plaintiffs in error, together with Martha Rabinovitz, William Kohen and Alex Rivlin, were the judges and clerks of election of the forty-first precinct of the twenty-fourth ward of the city of Chicago at a general election held on November 8, 1932. A proceeding under the provisions of the statute (Smith-Hurd Stat. 1933, chap. 46, p. 1312; Cahill’s Stat. 1933, p. 1925 ;) was begun in the county court of Cook county against the judges and clerks of this precinct charging that they were guilty of certain misconduct and misbehavior at such election. The defendants were found guilty. The court sentenced defendant Singer to sixty days and the defendant Arieu to thirty days in the county jail. The Appellate Court for the First District has affirmed these convictions. *(People*v. *Rivlin,*277 Ill. App. 183; id. 611.) The defendants sued out separate writs of error, which were consolidated here for hearing.

We have heretofore held that this type of proceeding is not a criminal case within the purview of section 11 of article 6 of the constitution and that a writ of error from this court will not lie to review the judgment of the Appellate Court. *(People*v. *Kotwas,*363 Ill. 336; *People*v. *Ford,*id. 340; *People*v. *Benjamin,*id. 344; *People*v. *Greenzeit,*id. 347.) Upon the authority of those cases the writs of error are each dismissed.

*Writs of error dismissed.*
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6454 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To clarify the primary functions and duties of the Office 

of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6454 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Advo3 cacy Improvements Act of 2022’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES 

5 OF THE OFFICE OF ADVOCACY OF THE SMALL 

6 BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. 

7 (a) PRIMARY FUNCTIONS.—Section 202 of Public 

8 Law 94–305 (15 U.S.C. 634b) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and the 

10 international economy’’ after ‘‘economy’’; 

11 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘complete’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘compete’’; and 

13 (3) in paragraph (12), by striking ‘‘serviced-dis14 abled’’ and inserting ‘‘service-disabled’’. 

15 (b) DUTIES.—Section 203(a) of Public Law 94–305 

16 (15 U.S.C. 634c) is amended— 

17 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

18 end; 

19 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at 

20 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(7) represent the views and interests of small 

23 businesses before foreign governments and inter24 national entities for the purpose of contributing to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6454 RFS

1 regulatory and trade initiatives which may affect 

2 small businesses.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                            4927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    75450
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1946
<INVENTORY>                                      55830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                139890
<PP&E>                                          174583
<DEPRECIATION>                                   47259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  355659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            68367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         19971
<OTHER-SE>                                      110792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    355659
<SALES>                                         133081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                133081
<CGS>                                           110601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   119303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11433
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4412
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7021
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.1 03.31.2014






Exhibit 10.1


FIRST AMENDMENT
to
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the "Company") adopted the Erie Indemnity Company Equity Compensation Plan (the "Plan") by action of its Board of Directors on February 21, 2013, and the Company's shareholders approved the Plan at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 17, 2013, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan the Board of Directors reserved authority to amend the Plan, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined to allow the payment of dividend equivalents prior to the vesting of a Participant's interest in Restricted Share Units,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:
1.Section 9(b)(vi) is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
(vi)   Dividend Equivalents.  Notwithstanding paragraph (iv), the Committee may, but it need not, provide for dividend equivalents with respect to an award of Restricted Share Units.  If the Committee provides for dividend equivalents, it shall specify as the terms and conditions of payment either those described in subparagraph (1) or those described in subparagraph (2):
(1)   Under the first alternative, as of each Class A Share dividend payment date, there shall be credited to a bookkeeping account established for a Participant an amount equal to the dividends that would be payable on that date with respect to the number of Shares covered by the  Restricted Share Units outstanding on that date under the Participant's award.  The Committee may provide for the crediting of interest on any dividend equivalents credited to a Participant’s account or may provide that the dividend equivalent credit be adjusted for hypothetical investment experience in such manner as the Committee may determine.  If the Participant forfeits his or her interest in Restricted Share Units, the Participant shall simultaneously forfeit any dividend equivalents (as adjusted) attributable to those Restricted Share Units.  Amounts credited to a Participant's account that are vested and not forfeited shall be payable in accordance with Section 9(c).
(2)  Under the second alternative, for each Class A Share dividend payment date, the Company shall pay to a Participant, or in the event of the Participant's death to his or her beneficiary, an amount equal to the dividends that would be payable on that date with respect to the number of Shares covered by the Restricted Share Units outstanding on that date under the Participant's award.  The Company shall pay the dividend equivalents on or as soon as practicable after the payment date of the dividends to which they relate, and not later than December 31 of the year of that payment date.









2.    This amendment is effective January 1, 2014, with respect to awards with award dates on or after January 1, 2014.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this document to be executed as of the 10th day of March, 2014.


ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY






By /s/ Sean J. McLaughlin            
Sean J. McLaughlin
Executive Vice President,
Secretary and General Counsel



2