alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


             STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            For the Years Ended March 31,
                                                        1998             1997       1996
                                                        ----             ----       ----
                                                       (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>                <C>
Weighted Average Number of Shares                
 of Common Stock Outstanding                           15,116          14,959       14,779
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options                        -               -          -
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
Weighted Average Shares
 Outstanding                                           15,116          14,959       14,779
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
Net Loss                                            $ (11,830)     $  ( 9,881)  $  ( 7,648)

Less Accrued Convertible Preferred Stock dividend        (541)              -            -
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
Net Loss Available to Common Shareholders           $ (12,371)     $   (9,881)  $   (7,648)
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
Net Loss Per Share
 Basic and Diluted                                  $    (.82)     $     (.66)  $     (.52)
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
Net Loss Per Share                                  $    (.82)     $     (.66)  $     (.52)
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------
                                                    ----------     -----------  -----------

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
                             to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Dana C.  Gavenda,  Chief  Executive  Officer and President of FSB Community
Bankshares, Inc., (the "Company") and Kevin D. Maroney, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  each certify in his capacity as an
officer of the Company that he has reviewed  the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended  September 30, 2008 (the "Report") and that to the best of
his knowledge:

1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 13, 2008               /s/ Dana C. Gavenda
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Dana C. Gavenda
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  November 13, 2008               /s/ Kevin D. Maroney
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin D. Maroney
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50321-50322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19680]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP08-401-000]

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request for 
Permission To Withdraw Tariff Filing

August 19, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 15, 2008, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) filed to request permission from the Commission 
to withdraw Columbia's proposed tariff sheets filed in the above-
captioned docket on June 5, 2008. Columbia contends that good cause 
exists to justify such a withdrawal and that certain Columbia shippers 
have agreed to withdraw, without prejudice, their Natural Gas Act 
section 5 compliant in Docket No. RP08-403-000 regarding issues raised 
by the Columbia filing.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (18 CFR 85.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such 
protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of section 
154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing 
a protest must serve a copy of that document on the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To 
facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will 
eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must 
create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration 
link. Select the eFiling

[[Page 50322]]

link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit original and 14 
copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filing in the above proceeding is accessible in the 
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets. For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected]. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 27, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-19680 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York v. John McManus.

—Motion denied on terms stated in order.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commercial Property Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, David C. Merrell, President and Corie Merrell of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/David C. Merrell
     ----------                            ---------------------
                                           David C. Merrell
                                           President and director

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/Corie Merrell
     ----------                            ----------------------
                                           Corie Merrell
                                           Secretary/Treasurer and
                                           director
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Levcor
         International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
         March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
         the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive
         Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2004

By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    -----------------------------
    Robert A. Levinson
    Chief Executive Officer

                                    Page 24
#### Hyman Persky, Respondent, v. Abraham Dubroff, Appellant, and Others.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the court at Special Term was without authority to grant the same, and motion *897granted, with ten dollars costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### BROOK-MAYS & CO. v. ALFRED. *

No. 4281.

Court of Appeals of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 16, 1932.

Wilson & Abramson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

J. F. Phillips, of Shreveport, for appellee.

*

Rehearing denied April 5, 1932.

DREW, J.

Plaintiff, Brook-Mays & Co., filed suit against Glen Alfred for rent in the amount of $451.18, claiming a lessor’s lien and privilege on the property in the leased premises, and had issued a writ of provisional seizure.

The amount of rent due is admitted; otherwise the allegations of plaintiff’s petition are denied. Defendant contends that he is not. the owner of “Milburne’s Studio,” the business that occupied the space for which the rent is alleged to be due, and denies that he entered into the contract of lease sued upon or was a party to it. His contention is that the business belonged to his son, Milbuxne Alfred, and that he is responsible for the rent.

On trial of the case in the lower coprt, there was judgment for defendant, rejecting the demands of plaintiff as of nonsuit, and plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal. Defendant has not appealed or answered the appeal, and, in brief, asks that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed.

The testimony offered in the case is very vague, indefinite, and uncertain. There is no doubt about the amount of rent that is due plaintiff and that some one owes this amount to him. However, the evidence is not sufficient to justify the judgment against the defendant, Glen Alfred, on any theory advanced by plaintiff. It was, no doubt, upon this theory that the lower court rejected the demands of plaintiff as of nonsuit. We think the judgment is correct.

It may be that plaintiff can produce sufficient evidence to show that the defendant herein is responsible for the rent; if not, it can sue whoever is responsible.

In an application to' reopen the case in the lower court, plaintiff alleged it had discovered new evidence showing the incorporation of the Milburne Studio, with Glen Alfred as president. The lower court refused to reopen the ease, and we are not asked to remand it for that purpose. However, the application alleged the incorporation to have taken place long after the time when the contract for rent was made on December 1, 1930, and we fail to see what bearing it could have on the case. Without a discussion of the testimony in detail, we are convinced that it is not sufficient to award judgment for plaintiff against defendant, and, as defendant, has failed to answer the appeal or to appeal, we aTe without authority to do anything other than affirm the judgment of the lower court.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          42,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    191,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               380,700
<PP&E>                                         190,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 877,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,700
<BONDS>                                        235,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     49,600
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   877,100
<SALES>                                        565,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               565,700
<CGS>                                          477,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  477,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               124,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (54,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.92)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30730

 

AVENGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SOUTHPOINT MARINA, ET AL.,

Defendants,

SOUTHPOINT MARINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-3424-C)

 

January 5, 1999

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In our April 13, 1998, opinion herein, we severed the appeal

of the corporate defendant Port Isabel Marina/South Point, Inc.

(also known as Southpoint Marina) because of its pending bankruptcy

proceedings in which said party was debtor (In re Port Isabel

Marina/South Point, Inc., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern
** At the same time, we in all things affirmed the judgment in

the nonsevered portion of the case (including the appeal of Scott

Rowland (individually and doing business as Southpoint Marina).

*** All pending, undisposed-of motions pertinent to said severed

case are denied.

2

District of Texas, McAllen Division, originally filed as No. 97-

21408-B-11 in said court), and we abated that severed appeal

pending termination of said bankruptcy proceeding or lifting the

automatic stay therein, whichever was first.** We have now been

informed that in September 1998 a final decree was entered in the

referenced bankruptcy closing the bankruptcy case. Counsel for the

corporate defendant-appellant has also advised that the corporate

defendant and all of its assets have been sold.

Accordingly, the severed portion of this case involving the

appeal of the said corporate defendant is now reactivated, and the

Court, after consideration of the briefs, pertinent portions of the

record, and the argument of counsel (this case was fully argued to

the Court before this Court’s order of April 13, 1998), concludes

that no cause for reversal has been demonstrated, and accordingly

as to said severed portion of this cause, namely the appeal of the

said corporate defendant, the judgment of the district court is in

all things AFFIRMED.***
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 628 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exclude certain aquaculture workers 

from treatment as seamen for the purpose of liability in the event 

of injury or death, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2021 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, and Mr. GRAVES of 

Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exclude certain 

aquaculture workers from treatment as seamen for the 

purpose of liability in the event of injury or death, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shellfish Aquaculture 

5 Improvement Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 628 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON RECOVERY FOR CERTAIN INJURIES 

2 INCURRED IN SHELLFISH AQUACULTURE AC3 TIVITIES IF A STATE REMEDY IS AVAILABLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30104 of title 46, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

7 the first sentence; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON RECOVERY BY AQUACULTURE

10 WORKERS.—For purposes of subsection (a)— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘seaman’ does 

12 not include an individual who— 

13 ‘‘(A) is an aquaculture worker if State 

14 workers’ compensation is available to such indi15 vidual; and 

16 ‘‘(B) was, at the time of injury, engaged in 

17 aquaculture in a place where such individual 

18 had lawful access. 

19 ‘‘(2) AQUACULTURE WORKER DEFINED.—For 

20 purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘aquaculture 

21 worker’ means an individual who— 

22 ‘‘(A) is employed by a commercial enter23 prise that is involved in the controlled cultiva24 tion and harvest of aquatic plants and animals, 

25 including— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 628 IH

1 ‘‘(i) the cleaning, processing, or can2 ning of fish and fish products; 

3 ‘‘(ii) the cultivation and harvesting of 

4 shellfish; and 

5 ‘‘(iii) the controlled growing and har6 vesting of other aquatic species; 

7 ‘‘(B) does not hold a license issued under 

8 section 7101(c) of this title; and 

9 ‘‘(C) is not required to hold a merchant 

10 mariner credential under part F of subtitle II 

11 of this title.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to injuries incurred on or after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gas
Transmission Northwest Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, P. Chrisman Iribe, President of Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |  |  |                         
|--------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|                |  | 
|August 12, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    P. CHRISMAN IRIBE
|                |  |  |  | P. Chrisman Iribe       
|                |  |  |  | President               



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation and will be retained by Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.