alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

BOISE INC. AND BZ INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC

We are providing this Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.,
Section 1350. It accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report).





I, Alexander Toeldte, chief executive officer of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC, certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC.



|                         |  |  |  |                             
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|/s/    Alexander Toeldte |  |  |  | /s/    Alexander Toeldte    
|Alexander Toeldte        |  |  |  | Alexander Toeldte           
|Chief Executive Officer  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer     
|Boise Inc.               |  |  |  | BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

I, Samuel K.
Cotterell, chief financial officer of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC, certify that:

(i) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC.



|                           |  |  |  |                             
|-------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|/s/    Samuel K. Cotterell |  |  |  | /s/    Samuel K. Cotterell  
|Samuel K. Cotterell        |  |  |  | Samuel K. Cotterell         
|Chief Financial Officer    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|Boise Inc.                 |  |  |  | BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Date: May 2, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate
Holdings LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029300
   <NAME>  CFC Services Corp.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19532]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0424]


Special Local Regulation; U.S. Nationals Waterski Racing 
Championship; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the U.S. Nationals Waterski 
Racing Championship special local regulation on Mission Bay from 8 a.m. 
on October 10, 2008 through 5 p.m. on October 12, 2008. This action is 
necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew, 
spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the 
waterway. During the enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter 
the special local regulation without permission of the Captain of the 
Port.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.1101 will be enforced from 8 a.m. 
on October 10, 2008 through 5 p.m. on October 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Petty Officer Kristen Beer, USCG, 
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 278-
7233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special 
local regulation for the U.S. Nationals Waterski Racing Championship in 
33 CFR 100.1101 on October 10, 2008, from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m., October 11, 
2008, from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m., and October 12, 2008, from 8 a.m. to 7 
p.m.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.1101, a vessel may not enter the 
regulated area, unless it receives permission from the COTP. Spectator 
vessels may safely transit outside the regulated area but may not 
anchor, block, loiter in, or impede the transit of participants or 
official patrol vessels. The Coast Guard may be assisted by other 
Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies in enforcing this 
regulation.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 100.1101(a) and 5 
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the 
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with extensive advance 
notification of this enforcement period via the Local Notice to 
Mariners, marine information broadcasts, local radio stations and area 
newspapers. If the COTP or his designated representative determines 
that the regulated area need not be enforced for the full duration 
stated in this notice, he or she may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
to grant general permission to enter the regulated area.

    Dated: August 8, 2008.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Diego.
 [FR Doc. E8-19532 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0547

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BEAU HERMAN MILLER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant Beau Herman Miller has filed a second motion for extension 

of time within which to file the reply brief in the captioned matter. 

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 13(1), “The appellant may serve and file a reply brief 

within 14 days after service of the brief of the appellee.” On August 27, 2021, the Court 

granted Appellant a 30-day extension, until October 4, 2021, to file the reply brief. The 

Order stated no further extensions would be granted. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the second motion for a 30-day extension is 

DENIED. Appellant has until October 18, 2021, within which to file the reply brief. 

The Court will not consider any further extensions. If the reply brief is not filed by 

October 18, the matter will be sent up to the Court for consideration on the briefs filed.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2021

09/30/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0547
#### In the Matter of the Application of Henry H. Moses for Letters of Administration of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of Caroline H. Cook, Deceased. William H. Calkins, Appellant; Henry H. Moses and Others, Respondents.

Decree affirmed, with costs, on the authority of *Matter of Wilson*(92 Hun, 318). All concurred, except Smith, P. J., dissenting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, August 19, 2008; 9:30 a.m. 

# Place:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425. 

## Meeting Agenda 

I. Approval of Agenda 

II. Approval of Minutes 
      - July 11, 2008 Meeting
      - July 28, 2008 Meeting

III. Announcements 

IV. Staff Director's Report 

V. Program Planning 
      - 2009 Briefing Topics
      - 2009 Statutory Report Topics
      - Discussion of FY 2010 Budget Submission

VI. Management and Operations 
      - Evaluation of AI on Order of Precedence

VII. State Advisory Committee Issues 
      - Discussion of SAC re-charter process

VIII. Future Agenda Items 

IX. Adjourn 

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8582. 

Dated: August 7, 2008. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel.

 [FR Doc. E8-18603 Filed 8-7-08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00190-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF K.E.M., A CHILD 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 11103-L2, Honorable Jack M. Graham, Presiding 

 

August 28, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

E.G.M. Sr. appeals the order of the trial court terminating his parental rights to 

K.E.M. E.G.M. Sr.’s appointed counsel has filed a brief in conformity with Anders v. 

California rendering her professional opinion that any issue that could be raised on 

appeal is frivolous and without legal merit. See 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed.

2d 493 (1967). E.G.M. Sr.’s counsel avers that she has zealously reviewed the record 

in this matter and can find no arguable points of appeal. Counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw and provided E.G.M. Sr. with a copy of the brief. Further, counsel has advised 

E.G.M. Sr. that he has the right to file a pro se response to the Anders brief. The Court 

has likewise advised E.G.M. Sr. of this right. Additionally, E.G.M. Sr.’s counsel has 
2

certified that she has provided appellant with a copy of the record to use in preparation 

of a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014). E.G.M. Sr. has not favored the Court with a response.

This Court has long held that an appointed attorney in a termination case might 

discharge her professional duty to her client by filing a brief in conformity with the 

Anders process. See In re A.W.T., 61 S.W.3d 87, 88–89 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, no 

pet.). Likewise, other intermediate appellate courts have so held. See Sanchez v. Tex. 

Dep’t of Family and Protective Servs., No. 03-10-00249-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 

2162, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 24, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re L.K.H, No. 11-

10-00080-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 1706, at *2–4 (Tex. App—Eastland Mar. 10, 2011, 

no pet.) (mem. op.); In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 849–50 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, pet. 

denied); In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, 326–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, 

no pet.).

We have conducted our own review of the record in this matter and have come to 

the conclusion that there are no arguable points of appeal. See In re A.W.T., 61 S.W.3d 

at 89. We, therefore, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We remind counsel that 

E.G.M. Sr. has the right to file a pro se petition for review with the Texas Supreme 

Court. Finally, having found no arguable points of appeal requiring reversal, we affirm 

the judgment of the trial court.

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00192

- CR & 04

- 19

- 00193

- CR

John Joe AVALOS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018

- CR

- 7068

, 2016

- CR

- 10374 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’ s unopposed final motion to extend time to file a motion for panel and en banc rehearing is granted. We order the appellant’s motion for panel and en banc rehearing, if any, due August 10, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that: (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay; (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the motion; and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the motion will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy workload to be an extraordinary circumstance

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of August, 2020

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
32.1









CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of CHINATEL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date:  May 15, 2009
                /s/
      George AlvarezGeorge
      Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer, President &
      Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1506

YVETTE COLE, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. SOUTH CAROLINA, State of; HAMPTON, County of, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:09-cv-00324-SB)

Submitted: November 5, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvette Cole, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Yvette Cole appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Cole that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Cole failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Cole has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XF43


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trawl Survey Advisory Panel, composed of representatives 
from the National Marine Fisheries Service's Northeast Fisheries 
Science Center (NEFSC), the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council 
(MAFMC), the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC), and 
several independent scientific researchers, will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 21, 2008, from 10 
a.m. to 6 p.m. and Friday, February 22, 2008, from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Crowne Plaza, Two Harmon 
Plaza, Secaucus, NJ 07094; telephone: (201) 348-6900.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; 300 S. 
New Street, Room 2115, Dover, DE 19904; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; 300 S. New Street, Room 2115, 
Dover, DE 19904; telephone: (302) 674-2331, extension 19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to review the 
status of the new research vessel FSV Henry B. Bigelow and evaluate 
survey protocols for the new survey.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically identified in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to M. Jan Saunders at the Mid-Atlantic Council 
Office, (302) 674-2331 extension 18, at least 5 days prior to the 
meeting date.

    Dated: January 30, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-1973 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
No. 77-1301.

#### Gannett Co., Inc. *v.*DePasquale, Judge, et al.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Intelligent Buying, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The amended annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 21, 2011





/s/ David GorodyanskyDavid GorodyanskyPrincipal Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC. and will be retained by INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6466 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6466

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to remove all adverse credit 
history related to a loan from the credit history of a borrower who has 
                        rehabilitated the loan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2022

Ms. Williams of Georgia (for herself, Ms. Ross, Ms. Stevens, Ms. Adams, 
Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mrs. McBath, Ms. Manning, 
     Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Ms. Wilson of Florida, and Ms. Norton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to remove all adverse credit 
history related to a loan from the credit history of a borrower who has 
                        rehabilitated the loan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Rehabilitation and 
Credit Score Improvement Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. DEFAULT REDUCTION PROGRAM.

    Section 428F(a)(1)(C) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 1078-6(a)(1)(C)) is amended by striking ``to remove the record 
of the default from the borrower's credit history'' and inserting ``to 
remove any adverse item of information relating to such loan from the 
borrower's credit history''.
                                 <all>
```