alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Quarterly Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



August 2, 2005
                                           /S/ STEPHEN L. BAUM
                                         ______________________
                                           Stephen L. Baum
                                           Chief Executive Officer
EX-35 (a)


OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
CENTERLINE SERVICING, INC.

The undersigned, James L. Duggins, the Chief Executive Officer of Centerline
Servicing Inc. (formerly known as ARCap Servicing, Inc.), the Special Servicer
under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement") dated as of April 1, 2006 ("Transaction Closing Date"), relating to
the Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-TOP22, hereby certifies as follows:


1. a review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the preceding
calendar year or portion thereof commencing from and after the Transaction
Closing Date and of the performance of the Special Servicer under the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's
supervision; and


2. to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, or portion thereof
commencing from the Transaction Closing Date.


Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given
them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, as of the 30th day of October, 2007, I have hereunto signed
my name.


/s/ James L. Duggins
James L. Duggins
Chief Executive Officer of
Centerline Servicing, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
### **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906CERTIFICATION**

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Premier Commercial Bancorp (the “Company”); for the period ended December 31, 2006, I, Kenneth J. Cosgrove, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.             ThisForm 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.             Theinformation contained in this Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2007
|        | By:    | /s/ Kenneth J. Cosgrove                                             |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |      Kenneth J. Cosgrove                   |
|   |   |      Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


            1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                  Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                  covered by this report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Home Equity
                  Loan Trust, Series 2006-S1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
                  reports");

            2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                  taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading with
                  respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
                  and other information required to be provided under Form
                  10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
                  the Exchange Act periodic reports;

            4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                  review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                  statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                  Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                  periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                  obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                  respects; and

            5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
                  related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
                  servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
                  be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
                  Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
                  been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
                  otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
                  of noncompliance described in such reports have been
                  disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
            information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
            The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

      Date: March 26, 2007


            /s/ Steve Bailey
            ---------------------------------------------
            Steve Bailey
            Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20890 Conference Calendar

LAWRENCE P. MILES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SUNBELT NAT’L BANK; LAUREN I. SCHVERAK; MICHAEL B. MASSEY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-92-1246

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lawrence P. Miles appeals from the denial of two motions for relief pursuant to F ED . R. C IV . P. 60(b). Miles contends that an October 30, 1995, order closing his case from which he did not file an appeal is void because the order barred him from future filings in his case. He argues that he never has been given an opportunity to present his case to a jury in open court.No. 96-20890 - 2 - To the extent that Miles seeks relief pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), the October 30, 1995, judgment was not void. It did not preclude Miles from filing a notice of appeal. To the extent that Miles seeks relief pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), the denial of Miles’s motions was not an abuse of discretion. Travellers Ins. Co. v. Liljeberg Enter., Inc. , 38 F.3d 1404, 1408 (5th Cir. 1994). Miles’s appeal is lacking in arguable merit and is frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Miles is warned that future frivolous appeals in this action will result in sanctions against him. Finally, Miles’s motion to expedite his appeal and for publication of the opinion in this case is DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### Edward H. Litchfield, Respondent, v. Edward A. Bond and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







August 2, 2007



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 13
- 00845
- CV

J. C. C., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 201ST DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 12
- 000387, THE HONORABL E SCOTT H. J ENKINS, JUDGE PRESID ING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on January 2, 2013

. By request to this Court dated January 6, 2014 , Chavela V. Crain requested an extension of 10 days.

T he Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit this Court from granting extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, including those from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, any exte nsions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not exceed 30 days cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Chavela V. Crain is hereby ordered to file the reporter’s record in
this case on or before January 17, 2014

. If the record is not filed by that date, Crain may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on January 7, 2014

.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin and Field
226 La. 114

#### STATE of Louisiana v. James ESPOSITO, Sr.

No. 41791.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 2, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 5, 1954.

*28John N. McKay, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., Leon D. Hubert, Jr., Dist. Atty., Howard J. Taylor, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

LE BLANC, Justice.

The defendant was charged by bill of information filed December 7, 1953, with a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:106(2) in that he did “wilfully and intentionally produce, sell, exhibit and possess with the intent to display and advertise, sexually indecent prints * * *.”

After pleading guilty to the charge, the defendant filed a motion in arrest of judgment based on the ground that:

> “The wording of the information is erroneous and improper in that it does not satisfactorily or clearly set out the charge for which the defendant was accused nor does it enable him to properly plead and more particularly with respect to the use of the word ‘sexually' said word being too broad to satisfactorily define the intendment of the prosecutor and likewise to satisfactorily enable the defendant to plead where said word is used in the indictment in the manner as set out in the records herein.”

This motion was overruled and a bill of exception reserved to the ruling. The defendant then filed a motion for a new trial based on the following ground:

> “The indictment of information charging the defendant with the crime of obscenity is faulty in that it fails to satisfactorily and rigidly set out a crime in that the wording of the information or indictment is too vague for defendant to be required to plead to or stand trial against said accusation.”

This motion was also overruled and a bill of exception was reserved to this ruling.

Subsequently, the defendant was sentenced to eighteen months in prison.

Both bills of exception present but one question, and that is “Does the term ‘sexually indecent’ properly inform the defendant as to the nature of the accusation against him?”

This same question was raised and decided in the case of State v. Roth, La., 74 So.2d 392. The opinion and decree in that case were handed down Monday, May 31, 1954 and the judgment is now final. It was there decided that the term “sexually indecent” has an accepted meaning, not susceptible to misunderstanding, and sufficiently informs the defendant as to the nature of the accusation against him.

For the reasons stated the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6098 

To amend the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to provide reimbursements 

for licensing and exam fees under the Veteran Rapid Retraining Assistance Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to provide 

reimbursements for licensing and exam fees under the 

Veteran Rapid Retraining Assistance Program of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENTS FOR LICENSING AND EXAM 

4 FEES UNDER VETERAN RAPID RETRAINING 

5 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

6 Subsection (c) of section 8006 of the American Res7 cue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117–2; 38 U.S.C. 3001 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6098 IH

1 note prec.) is amended by adding at the end the following 

2 new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(5) LICENSING AND EXAM FEES.—In carrying 

4 out retraining assistance under this section, the Sec5 retary shall provide reimbursements to eligible vet6 erans for licensing and exam fees in a manner the 

7 Secretary determines appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Administrative Agent”), dohereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-AR3 Trustfor the 2006 fiscal year (the “Relevant Year”):

1.                  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year. 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
| /s/ Barbara Campbell___________________________________________Name:  Barbara CampbellTitle:    First Vice President |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        $416,016                 $36,793
<SECURITIES>                                        $0                      $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 $884,927                $930,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                        $0                      $0
<INVENTORY>                                 $6,377,195              $5,922,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $8,140,521              $7,377,800
<PP&E>                                     $18,481,933             $17,827,847
<DEPRECIATION>                             $12,979,305             $12,312,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $14,373,541             $13,551,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $3,567,606              $3,470,208
<BONDS>                                     $2,563,136              $3,165,802
<COMMON>                                      $174,926                $174,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0                      $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0                      $0
<OTHER-SE>                                  $8,561,437              $7,165,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $14,373,541             $13,551,137
<SALES>                                     $1,326,374              $1,403,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $1,351,857              $1,428,088
<CGS>                                         $877,220              $1,136,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $877,220              $1,136,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $180,267                $176,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $54,792                 $79,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(310,799)              $(552,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        $0                      $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $(310,799)              $(552,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      $0                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0                      $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0                      $0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(310,799)              $(552,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.60)                 $(1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.60)                 $(1.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Jose Refugio GIL-BECERRA, Appellant.

No. 02-1958.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Before MCMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Jose Refugio Gil-Becerra appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Northern District of Iowa after he pleaded guilty to unlawfully reentering the United States following removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The district court sentenced Gil-Becerra to 12 months imprisonment to be followed by 1 year of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing for reversal that the guilty plea was involuntary because Gil-Becerra was led to believe by his counsel that he would be sentenced to time served.

We conclude that the district court did not plainly err in accepting Gil-Becerra’s guilty plea because he confirmed at his plea hearing that he realized, despite counsel’s prediction, that he could be sentenced to up to 2 years imprisonment. *See United States v. Granados,*168 F.3d 343, 345 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam). Having found no nonfrivolous issues following our independent review of the record in accordance with *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2018

No. 04-18-00240-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.L.L. III, ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02373

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s brief was due September 4, 2018. On that day, appellee filed a motion 

requesting a fourteen (14) day extension of time to file his brief. After consideration, we 

GRANT appellee’s request for an extension of time and ORDER the brief due on or before 

September 18, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
SENTRY PETROLEUM LTD. 
SHARE OPTION PLAN 
February 28, 2009



OPTION COMMITMENT



Notice is hereby given that, effective this 28th day of February, 2009 (the Effective Date) SENTRY PETROLEUM LTD. (the Company) has granted to Alan Hart, an Option to acquire 150,000 Common Shares (Optioned Shares) up to 5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the 28th day of February, 2014 (the Expiry Date) at a Exercise Price of US$1.04 per share. Optioned Shares may be acquired as follows:

| |     |                                                                                                               
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (a) | 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will vest twelve months after the Effective Date;          
| |     |                                                                                                               
| | (b) | a further 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will vest 24 months after the Effective Date; and
| |     |                                                                                                               
| | (c) | the remaining 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will vest 36 months after the Effective Date.

The grant of the Optioned Shares evidenced hereby is made subject to the terms and conditions of the Companys Share Option Plan, the terms and conditions of which are hereby incorporated in this Option Commitment.

To exercise your Option, deliver to the Company at its then principal business office, a written notice specifying the number of Optioned Shares you wish to acquire, together with cash or a certified cheque payable to the Company for the aggregate Exercise Price. A certificate for the Optioned Shares so acquired will be issued by the transfer agent as soon as practicable thereafter and will bear a legend stipulating any resale restrictions required under applicable securities laws.



SENTRY PETROLEUM LTD.

President

I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to be bound by the terms of the Plan. This commitment supersedes any prior Option or commitment made to me.

OPTIONEE

_ALAN HART________________________________

Name:       _Alan Hart___________________________

Address:   ___________________________________

___________________________________







---