alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6683

RICHARD MARTIN TALBERT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-96-1009-N)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Martin Talbert, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Talbert v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1009-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 25,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6797

CHARLES A. RIPPY, JR., 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00037-FDW) 

Submitted: August 15, 2014 Decided: August 27, 2014

Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Charles A. Rippy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Charles A. Rippy, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rippy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>
   Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
   the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
   </LEGEND>
   <CIK>  0001029318
   <NAME>  University Accounting Service Inc.
          
   <S>                             <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
   <CASH>                                          28,124
   <SECURITIES>                                         0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                   23,789
   <ALLOWANCES>                                       850
   <INVENTORY>                                     47,913
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,328
   <PP&E>                                          81,845
   <DEPRECIATION>                                  54,545
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,234
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,981
   <BONDS>                                              0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
   <PREFERRED>                                     11,699
   <COMMON>                                            53
   <OTHER-SE>                                           0
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,234
   <SALES>                                              0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,663
   <CGS>                                                0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,958
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,950
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,245)
   <INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,626)
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,619)
   <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
   <CHANGES>                                            0
   <NET-INCOME>                                  (20,619)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
           
<PAGE>

   
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Everett  L.  Hodges, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer  of  Petrominerals  Corporation,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of Petrominerals
Corporation;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  we  have:

a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record, process,
summarize  and  report  financial  data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were significant changes in internal
controls  or  in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent  to  the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.



Date:          Everett L. Hodges
11/15/02       -------------------
               President, CEO & Chief Financial Officer


                                       11
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Ocean Resources, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2004. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Officeland, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended August 31, 2000. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Online Gaming Systems Ltd. (n/k/a Advanced Resources Group Ltd.) because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Open EC Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended May 31, 2002. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of OVM International Holding Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2002. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on August 19, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 2, 2008. 

By the Commission. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-19493 Filed 8-19-08; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
CNX-3-31-14-EX10.6






[Date]
[CONSOL Energy Inc. Letterhead]
[Address]


Re: Acknowledgement Regarding 2013 CONSOL Stock Unit Award
Dear [Employee Name]:
In connection with the closing of the Murray Energy transaction, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") of CONSOL Energy Inc. reviewed the terms and conditions of the CONSOL Stock Unit awards (the "CSUs") granted under the Equity Incentive Plan on January 28, 2013 with a performance period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015 (the "Performance Period").  
The CSUs generally provided that if (i) CONSOL’s average closing stock price (as determined in accordance with the CSU program) at the end of the Performance Period (the "Ending Stock Price") equaled or exceeded 50% of the Company’s average closing stock (as determined in accordance with the CSU program) at the beginning of the Performance Period (the "Beginning Stock Price") and (ii) CONSOL’s return on average capital employed ("ROCE") for the Performance Period is at least 80% of an ROCE target for such Performance Period, as adjusted, then payout of each CSU award would be determined in accordance with the following formula:
CSUs           x        Stock Price at End of Performance Period
(Target)             Stock Price at Beginning of Performance Period
In connection with the Committee’s review of the CSUs, the Committee determined and approved a modification to all CSU awards, including yours, which provides that, for the CSU awards to be deemed earned and payable, the Ending Stock Price must equal or exceed the Beginning Stock Price.
Please execute this letter in acknowledgement and acceptance of the foregoing modification to your CSU award and return it to Sue Modispacher by April 1, 2014.   
Sincerely, 
 
[_________________]
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY:
_______________________________________________
[Insert Name]  
 
Dated:  February  __, 2014
1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2364

___________

Walter Edward Helgoth, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Gene Stubblefield, Superintendent; * 

George Hayes; Kay Crockett, * [UNPUBLISHED] 

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 6, 2002

 Filed: December 24, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Walter Edward Helgoth appeals the district court’s1

 order granting defendants’

motion for summary judgment. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude

summary judgment in favor of defendants was proper. Even disregarding the

evidence that Mr. Helgoth challenges as hearsay, there is still no trialworthy issue as
-2-

to whether he suffered “actual injury” for purposes of his access-to courts claim.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

NO. 19-0764

REGINA DELL BROWN AND

GWENDOLYN GABRIEL

v.

MERRY OUTLAW §

§

§

§

§

§ Dallas County,

5th District.

October 18, 2019

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

December 13, 2019

Petitioners' motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioners, REGINA DELL BROWN AND GWENDOLYN

GABRIEL, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 16th day of December, 2019

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
#### People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Carl Bellis, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 66-10.

Fifth District.

June 29, 1966.

Curt C. Lindauer, Jr., of Belleville, for appellant; John M. Earns, Jr., State’s Attorney of St. Clair County, of Belleville (Charles E. Hamilton, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH.

Not to be published in full.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029318
<NAME> UNIVERSITY ACCOUNTING SERVICE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,186
<INVENTORY>                                     68,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,105
<PP&E>                                          87,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,249
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
DFZ_2014.03.29_EX_10.4




Exhibit 10.4


	
			
	R.G. BARRY CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMPENSATION SUMMARY
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Compensation Element
	Individual Compensation


	 

	Annual Retainer (1)
	$  73,500 for 12-month period



	Interim Lead Director or Committee Chair additional cash retainer (2)
	$    8,876 annually





	Special Payments (3)
	As approved by Board of Directors



	Pension Committee Participation (4)
	$       500  per meeting



	Special Meeting –Telephonic (5)
	$    1,000 per meeting



	Special Meeting- In Person Participation (5)
	$    1,500 per meeting










		
	(1)
	Directors must elect annually how much of the annual retainer will be paid in the form of an equity award of common shares of R.G. Barry Corporation (the “Company”) (100%, 75% or a minimum requirement of 50%).  Remainder of retainer is paid in the form of cash in quarterly installments.


		
	(2)
	Additional annual retainer paid in quarterly installments to each of the Interim Lead Director and the Chairs of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee.


		
	(3)
	Ad hoc payment in cash, as determined and approved by the Board of Directors.  


		
	(4)
	As the Board of Directors’ liaison to the Company’s pension committee, one member of the Board of Directors receives $500 in cash for each meeting of that committee attended.


		
	(5)
	At the May 21, 2012 meeting of the Board of Directors, additional fees were approved for participation in any special meeting of the Board of Directors as may occur.  The additional compensation to be paid in cash for each such special meeting is $1,000 per meeting for telephonic participation by a member of the Board of Directors and $1,500 per meeting for in-person participation by a member of the Board of Directors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 50-400] 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Samuel Hernandez, Projects Branch 1, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O-11F1, Washington, DC, 20555-0001. Mr. Hernandez may be contacted by telephone at 1-800-368-5642, extension 4049 or via e-mail at                         *samuel.hernandez@nrc.gov*.                     

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of August, 2008. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Bo Pham, 

Acting Branch Chief, Projects Branch 1, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. E8-19377 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Wright, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,592.

First District, Second Division.

June 21, 1966.

Jack Ring, of Chicago, for appellant; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Carmen Speranza, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BUEKE.

Not to be published in full.
#### A. BOLOGNA & COMPANY, Inc., v. Westley Bowman ROBERTSON.

No. I960.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 22, 1939.

Ben N. Tucker, of Hammond, and Yar-rut & Stich, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Ellis & Bostick, of Amite, for appellee.

DORE, Judge.

It is agreed by the parties litigant 'and their counsel that the facts and issues in this case are similar to those in the case of A. Bologna & Co., Inc., v. Guiseppe Arcardo, 187 So. 290, which we have this day decided, and that the decision in the latter case is controlling herein.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in the case of A. Bologna & Co., Inc., v. Guiseppe Arcardo, the judgment of the District Court in the instant case is affirmed.