alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,710] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on July 18, 2008 in response to a petition filed by a state workforce official on behalf of workers of Citgo Lube and Wax Facility, Lake Charles, Louisiana. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated, since further investigation would serve no purpose. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2008. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-19409 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**EXHIBIT 10.4**

*SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM*

The following is a summary of the current compensation structure for non-employee directors of ViewPoint Bank, the wholly-owned operating subsidiary of ViewPoint Financial Group:

- $15,000 annual retainer;
- $500 per board meeting attended; and
- $300 per committee meeting attended.

In addition to the foregoing, the Chairman of the Board will receive $10,000 per year, the Audit Committee Chair will receive $7,500 per year and the Compensation Committee Chair will receive $5,000 per year for the additional responsibilities associated with these positions.

ViewPoint Bank is the wholly-owned operating subsidiary of ViewPoint Financial Group, which itself is a majority owned subsidiary of ViewPoint MHC.  The composition of the Boards of Directors of ViewPoint MHC, ViewPoint Financial Group and ViewPoint Bank are identical.  The directors of ViewPoint MHC and ViewPoint Financial Group are not compensated separately for their service on these boards.
Republic_Bedford_Employment_Agreement_Amendment






AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of February 28, 2014, by and between REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and BRYAN K. BEDFORD (the “Executive”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into that certain Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of November 2, 2010 (as amended on September 24, 2013, November 6, 2013, and January 24, 2014, the “Employment Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.    Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated to read in full:  “(a)    The term of employment pursuant to this Agreement (the “Term”) shall continue until June 30, 2014; provided that the Company may terminate this Agreement for any reason or no reason by providing the Executive with 30 days prior written notice of such termination.”
2.    Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall be effective upon signature by both the Company and the Executive.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC.


By: /s/Mark L. Plaumann
Name: Mark L. Plaumann
Title:   Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors




BRYAN K. BEDFORD


/s/Bryan K. Bedford    



I/3515256.2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6025 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6025

 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
           of a universal influenza vaccine or preventative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2021

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
           of a universal influenza vaccine or preventative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flu Vaccine Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE OR 
              PREVENTATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases shall conduct or support comprehensive research 
for the creation of a universal influenza vaccine or preventative.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there are authorized to be appropriated $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2022 through 2026.
                                 <all>
```
#### POLIZZI v. THIBODAUX.

No. 18795.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Oct. 5, 1948.

For former opinion see 35 So.2d 660.

Phil Trice, of New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant.

Sydney J. Parlongue, of New Orleans, for defendants and appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Our opinion and decree herein was handed down on June 7th, 1948. On June 28th, 1948, defendants-appellees petitioned for a rehearing.

The application comes ' toó late. The judgment became final and executory on the fifteenth calendar day after rendition, and it was only during the interval that the parties in interest had the right to apply for a rehearing. See Act No. 16 of 1910, § 1, Dart’s Gen.Sta't. § 1450.

Accordingly, the application for rehearing is not considered, having been filed too late.

Application for rehearing not considered.

REGAN, J., takes no part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CA-310-0777-XZ] 

# AGENCY:

Northeast California Resource Advisory Council, Susanville, California, Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting location change.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Pub. L. 94-579), the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's Northeast California Resource Advisory Council will meet Thursday and Friday, Sept. 18 and 19, 2008, in the Conference Room of the BLM Alturas Field Office, 708 West 12th St., Alturas, California. The meeting location is changed from an earlier announced location of the BLM Surprise Field Office, 602 Cressler St., Cedarville, California. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The original meeting notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Aug. 4, 2008 (Volume 73, No. 150, Notices, page 45242). Agenda items remain unchanged from the original announcement.                 

# FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Tim Burke, BLM Alturas Field Manager, at (530) 233-4666, or Public Affairs Officer Joseph J. Fontana, (530) 252-5332. 

Joseph J. Fontana, 

Public Affairs Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-19238 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CLINICAL PATHOLOGY

LABORATORIES, INC.

,

Appellant,

v.

JUAN POLO

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00067

- CV

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2018DCV2966)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the trial court correctly

denied Appellant’s motion to dismiss . We therefore affirm the trial court’s j udgment denying

defendants’ motion to dismiss and remand the cause for further proceedings. We further order

that Appellee recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, all costs in this Court. This decision

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 6 TH DAY OF AUGUST , 20 20

.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
185 La. 300

#### ELFER v. MARINE ENGINEERS BENEV. ASS’N NO. 12 et al.

No. 33428.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1936.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1936.

*347Edward A. Estalotte, of New Orleans, for appellant.

W. W. Wright, of New Orleans, for ap-pellees.

FOURNET, Justice.

Plaintiff instituted this suit against the Marine Engineers Benevolent Association No. 12, its officers and members, and Walter W. Wright, its attorney, to recover damages in the sum of $16,480 for alleged libel and slander and for loss of. employment.

Defendants filed exceptions of (1) vagueness; (2) misjoinder and nonjoinder of parties defendant; (3) no right or cause of action; and (4) prescription of one year.

The lower court maintained the exceptions of no right or cause of action and dismissed plaintiff’s suit. The plaintiff has appealed.

The gist of plaintiff’s petition, eliminating the extraneous allegations, is that plaintiff was expelled from the defendant association through the fraud, collusion, and conspiracy of its officers and its attorney; that there is no authority for such action on their part; that libelous matter, reflecting on the character of plaintiff, was -published in “The American Engineer,” a copy of which, although allegedly attached to the petition, apparently has not been annexed as we do not find it in the record; that on the trial of his case to be reinstated in the defendant association, in the district court and on appeal in the Supreme Court, defendants, through their counsel, libeled and slandered plaintiff by accusing him of having “surreptitiously” obtained the list of the membership of the defendant association and of “coming into court with unclean hands.” The plaintiff also alleges that he lost his position with the Dock Board through misrepresentations and appeals made by the defendant association ' to the Governor of this state, and as a re-suit thereof he has been without employment since January, 1931.

In plaintiff’s suit for reinstatement in. the defendant association, entitled Elfer v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass’n No. 12 et al., 179 La. 383, 390, 154 So. 32, 34, this court said:

> “We are satisfied from our examination of the record that the proceedings leading up to plaintiff’s expulsion from the defendant association were regular and in strict conformity to the constitution and by-laws of the organization.”

This holding necessarily disposes of plaintiff’s complaint in this case that he was illegally and improperly expelled from the defendant association.

The word “surreptitious” and the phrase “unclean hands” are not libelous per se and will not support an action for damages when used as alleged in the case at bar.

The allegation that plaintiff lost his employment through misrepresentations and appeals made by the defendant association is a mere conclusion. But in any event, if a right or cause of action were set forth in plaintiff’s petition, the claim for loss of employment would be barred by the prescription of one year.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

O’NIELL, C. J., absent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 003 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN LEE LONGTINE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 14, 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 8 2020

07/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0036
#### Rochester Yacht Club, Respondent, v. William W. Miller, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6240 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6240

 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2021

Mr. Stewart (for himself, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Moore of Utah, and Mr. Owens) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To release the reversionary interest of the United States in certain 
   non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES IN 
              NON-FEDERAL LAND IN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH.

    (a) Release.--There is released to the University of Utah, without 
consideration, the reversionary interest of the United States in the 
non-Federal land described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Non-Federal Land.--The non-Federal land referred 
to in subsection (a) is the approximately 593 acres of land of the 
University of Utah--
            (1) identified in the patent--
                    (A) numbered 43-99-0012; and
                    (B) dated October 18, 1968; and
            (2) more particularly described as tracts D (excluding the 
        parcels numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), G, and J, T. 1 S., R. 1 
        E., Salt Lake Meridian.
                                 <all>
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 34,340 4 DIANE BACA, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Jacqueline Flores, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 12 Vicki W. Zelle, Assistant Appellate Public Defender 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 162 WECHSLER, Judge. 1 {1} Defendant has appealed from a convicti on for DWI. We previously issued a 2 notice of proposed summary disposition inwhich we proposed to uphold Defendant’s 3 conviction. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition. After due consideration, 4 we remain unpersuaded. We therefore affirm. 5 {2} Defendant has raised a single issue, ch allenging the sufficiency of the evidence 6 to establish that she was driving. [DS 10] As we previously observed in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition, the State pres ented evidence that Defendant repeatedly 8 admitted that she had been driving. [DS 2-5, MIO 2] This is sufficient to support the 9 factfinder’s determination. See, e.g., State v. Orquiz , 2012-NMCA-080, ¶ 4, 284 P.3d 10 418 (observing that although no witnesses tes tified to seeing the defendant driving, 11 his admission at the scene was sufficient for a jury to infer that he actually drove). 12 {3} In her memorandum in opposition, Defendant focuses on the countervailing 13 evidence, including the “physical evidence” ( i.e. , the position of the driver’s seat), 14 [MIO 10] in support of her continuing assertion that the verdict is unsupported by the 15 weight of the evidence. [MIO 9-11] Ho wever, insofar as we cannot re-weigh the 16 evidence, Defendant’s argument does not supply a basis for reversal. See, e.g. , State 17 v. Owelicio , 2011-NMCA-091, ¶ 34, 150 N.M. 528, 263 P.3d 305 (observing, in a 18 similar case, that “[a]lthough there was other evidence and testimony indicating that 19[the d]efendant was not the driver, the factfinder [was] entitled to weigh these 1 inconsistencies against [thed]efendant’s admission and the evidence suggesting she 2 was driving[,]” and that on appeal this Court “will not disturb the factfinder’s 3 determinations” on such matters). We theref ore reject Defendant’s assertion of error. 4 {4} Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed summary 5 disposition and above, we affirm. 6 {5} IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

__________ ______________________ 8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 9 WE CONCUR: 10

________________________________ 11 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 12

________________________________ 13 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 14
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0447]


Achieving a Future Vision at the 2008 Parenteral Drug Association 
and the Food and Drug Administration Joint Regulatory Conference

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
meeting: Achieving a Future Vision at the 2008 Parenteral Drug 
Association and the Food and Drug Administration Joint Regulatory 
Conference. The topics to be discussed are: FDA's Pharmaceutical 
Inspectorate and the Global Harmonization Task Force; Trans Atlantic 
initiative; Product development; and legacy products; Supply chain; 
Combination products; and Recall root causes.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 8 through 12, 
2008, 7 a.m. to 6.
    Location: The meeting will be held at Renaissance Hotel, 999 9th 
St., NW., Washington, DC 20001.
    Contact: Wanda Neal-Ballard, Parenteral Drug Association, PDA 
Global Headquarters, Bethesda Towers, 4350 East West Hwy., Suite 200, 
Bethesda, MD 20814 or by telephone on 301-986-0293, ext. 111.
    Registration and Meeting Information: See PDA Web site, 
www.pda.org/pdafda2008 or contact Wanda Neal-Ballard on 301-986-0293, 
ext. 111. From now until August 25, 2008, registration fees are as 
follows: $1,600.00 for Members, $2,000.00 for Non-members, $615.00 for 
Government/Health Authority/Academic and $230.00 for Students. After 
August 25, 2008, registration fees are as follows: $1,800.00 for 
Members, $2,200.00 for Non-members, $700.00 for Government/Health 
Authority/Academic and $260.00 for Students.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Wanda Neal-Ballard at least 7 days in advance.

    Dated: August 18, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-19491 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

November 12, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated October 25, 2002 on our review of interim
financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation (the "Corporation") as of and
for the period ended September 30, 2002 and included in the Corporation's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by
reference in its Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-67606),
Registration Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-67606, 333-43890, 33-44380 and 333-36415), Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-26442, 33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363,
33-34362, 33-62648, 333-42231, and 333-52175) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 4
on Form S-8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061).

Very truly yours,


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
#### Hiram Merritt and George H. Merritt, Respondents, v. Perry E. Wilson Appellant.

Judgment affirmed by default, with costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of China Ruitai International Holdings Co., Ltd. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      November 15, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Dian Min MaDian
      Min Ma, Chief Executive
Officer