alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000076063
<NAME> PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,200
<PP&E>                                       2,679,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,761,300 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,833,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          805,800
<BONDS>                                        299,200
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     542,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,833,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,400 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,600 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is a wholly-owned
subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6109 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6109

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income cap 
    for and make permanent the mortgage insurance premium deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2021

Mr. Kind (for himself and Mr. Buchanan) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income cap 
    for and make permanent the mortgage insurance premium deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Middle Class Mortgage Insurance 
Premium Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE INCOME CAP FOR AND MAKING PERMANENT THE MORTGAGE 
              INSURANCE PREMIUM DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--(1) Section 163(h)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``$100,000 ($50,000)'' and 
        inserting ``$200,000 ($100,000)'', and
            (2) by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dr. Pepi SCHAFLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott D. FIELD; Reznick, Fedder & Silverman, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 02-1905.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

Pepi Schafler, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Oestreicher, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Schafler v. Field,*No. CA-02-1308-AW (D. Md. filed July 25, 2001; entered July 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 
  





 
 Arista Networks, Inc. 

5453 Great America Parkway 
 Santa
Clara, CA 95054 
 April 4, 2014 
 Via Overnight
Delivery and Email 
 PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 

The 2010 David R. Cheriton Irrevocable Trust Dtd July 27, 2010, 

South Dakota Trust Company LLC, TTEE 
 c/o South Dakota Trust
Company LLC 
 201 South Phillips Avenue, Suite 200 
 Sioux
Falls, SD 57104 
 Attn: Jeanice L. Caselli 
 Phone:
(605) 271-5132 
 Email: jeanice@sdtrustco.com 
  

	RE:	Notice Regarding Conversion of Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note issued by Arista Networks, Inc. to The 2010 David R. Cheriton Irrevocable Trust Dtd July 27, 2010, South Dakota Trust Company LLC, TTEE dated
January 4, 2011 (the “Note”) 

 Dear Sir or Madam: 

Arista Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) has recently confidentially submitted a Registration Statement on Form S-l (“Registration
Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of conducting a firm commitment underwritten public offering of the Company’s Securities (“Initial Public Offering”). 

The purpose of this letter is to (a) provide you notice of the proposed Initial Public Offering and that the Company may name you in the Registration
Statement pursuant to SEC rules or regulations or requests related thereto, and (b) confirm your agreement that upon closing of the Initial Public Offering (the “IPO Closing Date”) you shall elect to convert, in accordance
with, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Note including Section 4 thereof, the outstanding principal amount of the Note, together with all unpaid interest accruing thereon up to the IPO Closing Date (the “Outstanding
Indebtedness”), into fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the price per share of the Company’s Common Stock in the Initial Public Offering (the “IPO Price”). 

We will inform you of the expected IPO Closing Date, Outstanding Indebtedness and IPO Price as soon as practicable prior to the IPO Closing Date. 

For sake of clarity, this notice shall not be deemed a prepayment notice under Section 1 of the Note. Additionally, your confirmation and election to the
conversion of the Note and payment of any and all accrued interest shall be subject to the completion of the Initial Public Offering. 







 Please confirm your agreement to the matters herein by signing and returning this letter to me as soon as
possible but in no event later than April 15, 2014 via email to mtaxay@aristanetworks.com while sending the original to the address listed above. We look forward to furthering our relationship with you and would appreciate your prompt
response. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Jayshree Ullal

	Jayshree Ullal
	President and Chief Executive Officer


 Enclosures 
 ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO 
 ON THIS 7th DAY OF APRIL 2014: 

THE 2010 DAVID R. CHERITON IRREVOCABLE TRUST DTD JULY 27, 2010, SOUTH DAKOTA TRUST COMPANY LLC, TTEE 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeanice Caselli

	Name:	 	Jeanice Caselli
	Title:	 	Vice President & Trust Officer
	Date:	 	April 7, 2014


  
 2
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, William Threadgill, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of STRATS(SM) Trust For Allstate Corporation Securities, Series 2006-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.


Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc.

(Depositor)Dated: March 30, 2011
By:
/s/ William ThreadgillWilliam ThreadgillPresident(senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization)
#### Oak-Hee RUESCH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. William P. DILLON, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 01-1281.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2002.

Oak-Hee Ruesch on brief pro se.

Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, SELYA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We *affirm*the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint substantially for the reasons set forth in the court’s memorandum order of November 15, 2000. Plaintiffs later motion for reconsideration and new pleading did not cure the complaint’s *12defects nor otherwise show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed.

*Affirmed.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of LILM, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **George I. Norman, III**, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the            Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEORGEI.NORMAN,III** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**George I. Norman, III**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

March 30, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
CONVERTIBLE
      PROMISSORY NOTE





$17,775.89                                                                                                       Denver,
      Colorado


January
      1,
      2004







FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PARK-PREMIER MINING COMPANY, a Utah corporation (the
“Maker”), herby promises to pay to the order of Lee Family (the “Holder”), the
      principal sum of Seventeen Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-five and 89/100 US
      Dollars ($17,775.89), together with interest on the unpaid balance at the rate
      of Twelve Percent (12%) per annum, on or before January 1, 2007, subject to
      conversion as described below.  Accrued interest will be added to the
      principal of the note on each annual anniversary date if not paid.




This Note may be converted into shares of Maker’s common stock at the conversion
      price of $.10 per share or such other conversion price as the board of directors
      may deem appropriate, not in excess of $.10 per share, until the due date
      hereof, at the Holder’s option.





This
      Note is subject to prepayment, in
      whole or in part, at the option of the Maker without penalty.  Such
      prepayments shall be applied first to interest accrued and then to the principal
      due hereunder.





In
      case the Note shall not be paid in
      full whenever it shall become due, the Maker agrees to pay all costs and
      expenses of collection including reasonable attorney’s fees, not to exceed 15%
      of the unpaid balance.




All
      rights and obligations hereunder
      shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado.  If any part
      of the assets or capital stock of maker is sold or transferred without Holder’s
      prior written consent, except sales and transfers in the ordinary course of
      business and except transfers by devise, descent or by operation of law upon
      the
      death of a joint tenant:  (1) Holder may, at Holder’s option, declare
      all the sums due under this Note to be immediately due and payable, and (2)
      if
      the sale or transfer involves substantially all of the assets of Maker, the
      transferee shall be deemed to have assumed all of the obligations of Maker
      under
      this Note.





This
      Note is unsecured.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has
      signed his Note effective as of the date first above written.





PARK-PREMIER
      MINING
      COMPANY





By:     /s/
      Robert W. Dunlap


Its:     President


Description:  Unreimbursed
      expenses
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ )

JANE / JOHN DOES 1

- 144

, )

)

Plaintiff s

, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 07

- 1048 (PLF)

)

CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. )

and DAVID DOES 1

- 10, )

)

Defendant s

. )

__________________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 [Dkt.

No. 38] is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ requests for jurisdictional discovery are

DENIED; it is

FURT HER ORDERED that defendant Steven Warshaw is DISMISSED from this

case ; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against defendants Fernando Aguirre,

Robert Kistinger, Robert Olson, and William Tsacalis shall be severed pursuant to Rule 21 of the

F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure and TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Ohio pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 ; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against defendants Cyrus Freidheim and

Charles Keiser shall be sever ed pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and2 TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 ; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transfer all pap ers in this

proceeding, together with a certified copy of this Order, to the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Ohio and to the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Florida; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the C lerk of the Court shall remove this case from

the docket of this Court.

SO ORDERED.

/s/

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: January 11, 2018
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Anna Herbst, the President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Anna HerbstPresident Date: August 6, 2007
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Constant A. Andrews, Respondent, to Restore Blanche L. Andrews to Her Liberty and Property, and to Supersede the Commission de Lunatico Inquirendo, Wherein the Said Blanche L. Andrews Was Adjudged Insane. Nannie V. Roosevelt and John E. Roosevelt, Appellants.

Second Department,

December 30, 1908.

Incompetent persons — practice —inquiry into present mental condition —venue.

An application to the Supreme Court to inquire into the present mental condition of one judicially declared incompetent mustbemadein the judicial district where the incompetent resided at the time she was adjudged insane.

Such motion should be made in the original proceeding, and not entitled as a new proceeding.

Appeal by Mannie Y. Boosevelt and another from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Bockland Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 27th day of October, 1908, directing an inquiry into the present mental condition of Blanche L. Andrews, granted on the motion of her husband.

Blanche L. Andrews was found upon due inquisition in 1903 to be a lunatic, and committees of her person and her property were appointed by the Supreme Court in Mew York county, the place of her residence with her husband.

*John F. Devlin [George O. Kobbé*and *Grant Notman*with him on the brief], for the appellants.

*William M. Seabury [Charles Stewart Butler*with him on the brief], for the respondent.

Gaynor, J.:

This application should have been made in the county of Mew York, and the court should have refused to hear it in the county of Bockland. A proceeding to have a person declared a lunatic, and his property and person put in the charge of a committee, has to be had in the judicial district in which such person resides, as is prescribed by section 2323 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section *5872343 provides that when the lunatic becomes competent again, the court must discharge the committee of his person and property, and restore his property to him. It does not specifically say the application therefor must be in such place of his residence, but that follows plainly enough from reading the whole title on the subject (§§ 2320-2344); and the matter is settled by judicial decision. Also, the motion should be in the original proceeding, and not in a newly entitled proceeding, as here *(Matter of*Porter, 34 App. Div. 147; *Matter of*Osborn, 74 id. 113; *Matter of Bischoff,*80 id. 326). The order should be reversed and the proceeding dismissed.

Woodward, Jerks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and proceeding dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17

- 1965 Filed January 23, 2019

TROY PATRICK SHEARON , Applicant

- Appellant,

vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott , Judge.

Troy Shearon appeals the summary disposition of his postconviction

- relief application. AFFIRMED.

Angela Campbell of Dickey & Campbell Law Firm, PLC , Des Moines , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Zachary C. Miller , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J. , and Doyle and Mullins, JJ.2

MULLINS , Judge
. Troy Shearon was convicted of first

- degree murder and robbery. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. See generally State v. Shearon , 449 N.W.2d 86 (Iowa Ct. App. 1989). He subsequently filed a postconviction

- relief (PCR) application , which was unsuccessful in the district court and on appeal. In the instant PCR action, the district court granted summary disposition to the State

. Shearon appeals, raising three issues: (1) federal law requires retroactive application of State v. Heemstra , 721 N. W.2d 549 (Iowa 2006) ; (2) we should create a better framework for retroactivity under the Iowa Constitution to provide greater protections; and (3) trial and appellate counse l provided ineffective assistance. Appellate review of summary disposition ruling s in PCR p roceedings is for legal error while claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are reviewed de novo. Castro v. State , 795 N.W.2d 789, 792 (Iowa 2011). In its ruling on the State’s motion for summary disposition , the district court considered e ach of the issues raised in this appeal, provided a thorough and meaningful analysis of each issue, found no genuine issues of material fact, and granted the State’s motion for summary disposition as a matter of law. See Iowa Code § 822.6 (2014)

. We agree with the conclusions and ruling of the district court. 1 We affirm without further opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1) (c), ( d) , and (e).
AFFIRMED
.

1 To the extent Shearon ask s for re

- examination of and changes t o Iowa Supreme C ourt precedents, we are not at liberty to do so. See State v. Beck , 854 N.W.2d 56, 64 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN MINCH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 519 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.