alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
($ in millions)

|                                                |                      |   |               |         |              |  |         |         | 
|----------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | - | ------------- | ------- | ------------ |  | ------- | ------- | 
|                                                |                      |   | September 30, |         | December 31,
|                                                |                      |   | 2003          |         | 2002        
|                                                |                      |   |               |         |             
|Short-term debt                                 |                      | $ | 48.5          |         |              |  | 35.2    |        
|Current portion of long-term debt               |                      |   | 124.4         |         |              |  | 127.0   |        
|Long-term debt                                  |                      |   | 1,847.8       |         |              |  | 1,948.4 |        
|                                                |                      |   |               |         |              |  |         |        
|                                                | Total debt           |   |               | 2,020.7 |              |  |         | 2,110.6 | 
|Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries |                      |   | 74.0          |         |              |  | 65.3    |        
|Shareholders equity                            |                      |   | 2,832.7       |         |              |  | 2,813.6 |        
|                                                |                      |   |               |         |              |  |         |        
|                                                | Total capitalization |   | $             | 4,927.4 |              |  |         | 4,989.5 | 
|                                                |                      |   |               |         |              |  |         |        
|Ratio of total debt to total capitalization     |                      |   | 41.0          | %       |              |  | 42.3    | %      
|                                                |                      |   |               |         |              |  |         |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 788 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 788

 To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
      to prohibit the consideration of retroactive tax increases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1995

Mr. Royce (for himself, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Saxton, 
  Mr. Stearns, Mr. Christensen, Mrs. Smith of Washington, Ms. Dunn of 
Washington, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Roth, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. 
Miller of Florida, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Heineman, Mr. Bachus, Mr. 
 Rogers, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Longley, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. 
Fields of Texas, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Myers of Indiana, Mr. Calvert, Mr. 
Bunn of Oregon, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mr. Gekas, Mr. 
Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Canady of Florida, Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Burr, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. Jones, Mr. Weller, Mr. 
Weldon of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Dornan) introduced the following bill; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
      to prohibit the consideration of retroactive tax increases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizens' Tax Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET AND IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL 
              ACT OF 1974.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
is amended by adding at the end the following:

    ``prohibition on the consideration of retroactive tax increases

    ``Sec. 314. (a) In General.--It shall not be in order in the House 
of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill, joint 
resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report carrying any 
retroactive tax increase.
    ``(b) Increases a Tax.--The term `increase' shall include any 
change to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that would result in an 
increase in tax for any taxpayer.
    ``(c) Subsection (a) may be waived in the House of Representatives 
only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members voting.''.
    (b) Supermajority Point of Order.--Subsections (c) and (d) of 
section 904 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are amended by 
inserting ``314,'' after ``313,''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents set forth in 
section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget 
and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by inserting after the 
item relating to section 313 the following:

``Sec. 314. Prohibition on the consideration of retroactive tax 
                            increases.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

               Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)
                    under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of RAMP
Series 2006-RZ2 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do
not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances  under
which such  statements  were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,   servicing  and  other
information  required to be provided  under Form 10-D for the period  covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.I am responsible  for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
based on my knowledge  and the  compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing  the
servicer  compliance  statements  required  in this  report  under  Item 1123 of
Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
material respects; and

5.All of the reports on  assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing  criteria for asset-backed  securities  required to be
included  in this  report in  accordance  with Item  1122 of  Regulation  AB and
Exchange  Act Rules  13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit to this
report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance  described in such  reports have been  disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

        Date:  March 26, 2007
        By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
               Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
               Title: Managing Director
187 La. 577

#### STATE v. BOGGAN.

No. 34360.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 24, 1937.

J. Reuel Boone, of Many, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Edwin M. Fraser, of Many, for the State.

ODOM, Justice.

The defendant in this case was prosecuted and convicted for selling intoxicating liquors in Sabine parish, where the sale of such liquors is prohibited by law. Like the indictment in State v. Pridgen (La.Sup.) 175 So. 63, this day decided, the indictment does not allege that the liquors were sold for beverage purposes; and, as in the Pridgen Case, the defendant filed no demurrer, but after conviction and before sentence filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled.

The issues involved» in the two cases are identical, and for the reasons assigned in the Pridgen Case, the motion in arrest of judgment filed in this case is sustained, the conviction and sentence are annulled, and it is ordered that defendant be discharged.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 of Phelps Dodge
Corporation (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |        |  |                                                  
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  |        |  |                                                  
| |  |        |  | /s/ Ramiro G. Peru                               
| |  |       
| |  | Name:  |  | Ramiro G. Peru                                   
| |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | Date:  |  | July 28, 2003
#### Robert C. Williams v. William Deering & Co.

1. *Evidence—Of Defective*Machinery.—The plaintiff has a right to , show that the machine by which he was hurt was in a defective and dangerous condition for a long time before and within half an hour of the time of the accident, that such condition was not apparent, and that the defendant had prior knowledge thereof.

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridgb Hanecy, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1902.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed November 13, 1902.

F. W. Jaros, attorney for plaintiff in error.

0. W. Dynes, attorney for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Ball

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action for personal injuries from defective machinery.

The plaintiff had the right to show, if he could, by the witness Reiter, that the machine by which he was hurt was in a defective and dangerous condition for a long time before and within half an hour of the time of the accident; that such condition was not apparent, and that the defendant had prior knowledge thereof.

In our opinion a full and fair chance was not given the plaintiff in the trial court to present the grounds upon which he based his claim.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00375

- CR

EX PARTE DOUGLAS RAY EVANS

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- 1876

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A document, specifically addressed to this Court and entitled, “Rebuttal of State Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law , ” was recei ved from Douglas Ray Evans on
November 2 0 , 2023. This document was interpreted and filed by this Court on November
21, 2023, as a notice of appeal. By letter dated November 28, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Evans that his appeal was subject to dismissal because there wa s no final, appealable judgment or order from which to appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a). Specifically, the Clerk informed Evans

that f indings of fact and conclusions of law were not separately appealable . In the same

letter , the Clerk warned Evans that the appeal w ould be dismissed unless, within 21 days

from the date of th e letter, Evans re spon ded and explain ed what he attempted to appealEx parte Evans Page 2 and how the Court had jurisdiction of t he appeal. Evans timely responded and informed

the Court that the document was intended to be sent to the 1 9th District Court in McLennan County, Texas, not this Court. Accordingly, b ased on Evans’ representation , we dismiss this appeal and return

the original document to Evans. The Court has maintained a copy of the document in Court’s TAMES filing system under this appellate case number.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 4, 2024 Do not publish [OT06]
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of China Ruitai International Holdings Co., Ltd. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      November 15, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Gang MaGang
      Ma, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 35.6


     Servicer Compliance Statement for SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., as Servicer


SunTrust Mortgage

JPMorgan - Reference attached Schedule "A" for deal ID's

     In  connection  with the loans  serviced by SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  for  JPMorgan,  I,  the  undersigned  officer,  hereby  certify  the
following as of December 31, 2006:

(i)  The Company  conducted a review of its  activities  during the  immediately
     preceding  calendar  year  (or  applicable  portion  thereof)  and  of  its
     performance under the Servicing Agreement(s)/Purchase and Sale Agreement(s)
     and any applicable Reconstitution  Agreement(s) (together, the "Transaction
     Agreements") during such period has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations  under the  Transaction  Agreements in all
     material  respects  throughout  such calendar year (or  applicable  portion
     thereof),  except  that as of  January 1, 2006,  the  Company  did not have
     procedures for monitoring  compliance with requirements as specified in the
     applicable transaction agreements governing SEC Regulation AB transactions.
     To address the absence of such  procedures,  the Company's  management  has
     undertaken and completed the following  actions:  (a) completed a review of
     each  Transaction  Agreement and identified if there was specific  language
     affecting any of the Servicing  Criteria  outlined in Section 1122;  (b) to
     the degree that the Transaction  Agreements  required  specific  procedures
     related to the servicing  criteria,  the Company's  Reference Point Library
     (where all  policies and  procedures  are  maintained)  was updated to this
     effect;  (c)  for  each  pool,  a  Central  Matrix  was  completed  (and is
     maintained on a current basis)  identifying  which  Transaction  Agreements
     control each pool;  and (d)  established a monthly review process where the
     Company's  managers  review key factors of  performance  under  Transaction
     Agreements and respond to a questionnaire  indicating  compliance with such
     factors.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I do hereby  certify  the  foregoing  as of the date
hereof.


By:  /s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.
     -----------------------
     Senior Vice President - Manager, Servicing Division

Date:  February 27, 2007



Schedule A

Deal ID         Investor Name                   Master Servicer
--------        -------------------------       ---------------------

GSAA 2006-5     Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co.      JP Morgan
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick M. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick M. Murphy                       
|Patrick M. Murphy                           
|Senior Vice President,                      
|Chief Financial Officer,                    
|Secretary and Treasurer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|Date: April 27, 2004
<table>

EXHIBIT 12.1
PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in millions)
<caption>

                                                                                          Nine
                                                                                        months
                                                                                         ended
                                                                                  September 30,
                             1997        1998        1999        2000        2001         2002
                         --------    --------    --------    --------    --------  -----------

                       <c>        <c>        <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>
Fixed Charges:

Interest                     $ 91        $ 84        $ 82        $ 72        $ 88         $ 46
Interest portion of
  annual rentals               12          11           3           4           3            1
Preferred dividends
  of subsidiaries (1)          13           2           2           2           2            2
                         --------    --------    --------    --------    --------    ---------
Total Fixed Charges
  for Purpose of Ratio       $116        $ 97        $ 87        $ 78       $ 93          $ 49
                         ========    ========    ========    ========    ========    =========

Earnings:

Pretax income from
  continuing operations      $335        $274        $350        $396        $377         $296
Total Fixed Charges
  (from above)                116          97          87          78          93           49
                         --------    --------    --------    --------     -------    ---------
Total Earnings for
  Purpose of Ratio           $451        $371        $437        $474        $470         $345
                         ========    ========    ========    ========     =======   ==========
Ratio of Earnings
  to Fixed Charges           3.89        3.82        5.02        6.08        5.05         7.04
                         ========    ========    ========    ========     =======   ==========

(1)	In computing this ratio, "Preferred dividends of subsidiaries" represents the
before-tax earnings necessary to pay such dividends, computed at the effective tax
rates for the applicable periods.

</table>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 862

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to promote homosexuality.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1995

Mr. DORNAN (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.

BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. MANZULLO) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to promote

homosexuality.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO

4 PROMOTE HOMOSEXUALITY.

5 No Federal funds may be used directly or indirectly

6 to promote, condone, accept, or celebrate homosexuality,

7 lesbianism, or bisexuality.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                            3447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    64602
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1577
<INVENTORY>                                      55467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                125601
<PP&E>                                          149425
<DEPRECIATION>                                   37063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  286244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            60336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         19963
<OTHER-SE>                                       95102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    286244
<SALES>                                         113387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                113387
<CGS>                                            95308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   102497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8980
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3502
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5478
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>