alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000075448
<NAME> NSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             710<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (256)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,894
<PP&E>                                           9,863<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,917)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F4>
<COMMON>                                           952
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,840
<SALES>                                         15,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,226
<CGS>                                           12,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   991<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,896)<F6>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   ($.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Cash balance includes $521 of restricted cash.
<F2>PP&E balance includes $6,892 of goodwill and other intangible assets.
<F3>Accumulated depreciation balance includes $817 of accumulated amortization
attributable to goodwill and other intangible assets.
<F4>Preferred stock issued and outstanding includes the following: Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock, 1,667 shares; Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock, 3,300 shares; Series C Preferred Stock, 1,500 shares.
<F5>Other costs of $991 represents depreciation and amortization expense.
<F6>Net loss applicable to common stock of $8,896 is after $1,173 in preferred
stock dividends of which $1,045 was an embedded dividend attributable to a
beneficial conversion privilege.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Kathryne T. Foley, Appellant, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 35.3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER PURSUANT TO ITEM
1123 OF
REGULATION AB

March 30,
2007

CIT Funding
Company, LLC
1 CIT Drive
Livingston, NJ 07039

The Bank of
New York
101 Barclay Street, Fl. 8W
New York, New York 10286

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Re: | Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2006
  among CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, as Trust, CIT
  Funding Company, LLC, as Depositor, and CIT Financial USA,Inc., in its individual capacity and as Servicer (the Agreement).

I,
Nicholas Michael Small, Assistant Controller of CIT Technology Financing
Services, Inc. (the Sub-Servicer), hereby certify that:

A
review of the activities of the Sub-Servicer during the period from March 23,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the Reporting Period) and of the
performance of the Sub-Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;
and

To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Sub-Servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period, except as described on Appendix B to the Sub-Servicers Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

| |  |                                                              |                             
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------
| |  | CIT
  Technology Financing Services, Inc.,
  as Sub-Servicer
| |  |                                                              |                             
| |  |                                                              |                             
| |  | By:                                                          | /s/ Nicholas Michael Small  
| |  |                                                              | Name: Nicholas Michael Small
| |  |                                                              | Title: Assistant Controller 

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commercial Property Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, David C. Merrell, President and Corie Merrell of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/David C. Merrell
     ----------                            ---------------------
                                           David C. Merrell
                                           President and director

Date: 9/14/2004                            /s/Corie Merrell
     ----------                            ----------------------
                                           Corie Merrell
                                           Secretary/Treasurer and
                                           director
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6297 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6297

    To prohibit a drawdown and sale of petroleum products from the 
Strategic Petroleum Reserve if the President has withdrawn certain land 
           from oil and gas leasing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2021

Mr. Budd (for himself, Mrs. Bice of Oklahoma, Mr. Perry, Mr. Carter of 
Georgia, Mrs. Hinson, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Steube, Mr. Gibbs, and Mr. Cole) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit a drawdown and sale of petroleum products from the 
Strategic Petroleum Reserve if the President has withdrawn certain land 
           from oil and gas leasing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strategically Lowering Gas Prices 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DRAWDOWN AND SALE OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.

    Section 161 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6241) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Effect of Withdrawal of Lands.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsections (d) and (h), 
        the Secretary may not draw down and sell petroleum products 
        pursuant to a finding made by a President under this section if 
        that President, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, 
        has withdrawn land that is subject to disposition under any of 
        the mineral leasing laws from oil and gas leasing.
            ``(2) Withdrawal by statute.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), a withdrawal of land from oil and gas leasing provided by 
        statute shall not be considered a withdrawal by the President.
            ``(3) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with 
        respect to a drawdown and sale that is required by a severe 
        energy supply interruption that is caused by an act of 
        sabotage, an act of terrorism, or an act of God.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Shore Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 10, 2005

  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40687

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEVIN DEVON DOMIO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CR-120-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Devin Devon Domio appeals his sentence in his guilty-plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled

substance. He contends that the information in the PSR was

unreliable and that the PSR relied on multiple hearsay. 

Domio bears the burden of proving that the information in

the PSR is inaccurate or unreliable. United States v. Angulo,

927 F.2d 202, 205 (5th Cir. 1991). If hearsay evidence has

sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable 
No. 97-40687 

-2-

accuracy, a district court may consider it when making sentencing

decisions. United States v. Billingsley, 978 F.2d 861, 866 (5th

Cir. 1992). Domio admitted his conduct in selling crack cocaine

to his customers every 7 to 10 days. These customers included

various persons who in turn informed the confidential informant

that the source of their crack cocaine was Domio. Thus, the

hearsay and the PSR had a sufficient indicia of reliability. See

United States v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Further, Domio has submitted no evidence to contradict the

information in the PSR. In the absence of any rebuttal evidence,

the district court was not clearly erroneous in relying on the

PSR, even if the PSR relied on hearsay. See United States v.

Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in

calculating Domio’s relevant conduct. See United States v.

Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 345 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00525

- CV

Sammy J. Geiger , Appellant

v.

Barry Cohen , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICE S TRIANA AND THEOFANI S

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

– OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the jud gment signed by the tr i a l court on July 22, 2022 . Having reviewed

the record , the Court holds that Sammy J. Geiger h as not prosecuted his appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for

want of pros ecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of

costs is made.
Exhibit 10.12

 

ADDENDUM TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Addendum (the “Addendum”) is entered into effective as of January 1, 2014, by and between NORTH CAROLINA RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC., a North Carolina limited liability company (“MANAGEMENT SERVICES”) and RADIATION THERAPY ASSOCIATES OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, P.A., a North Carolina professional corporation (the “PA”). This Addendum amends Section 3.1 of the Administrative Services Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between the parties (the “Agreement”) to adjust the monthly Service Fee payable at the rate of $530.00 per external beam treatment billed as paid in 2013 to a monthly Service Fee payable at the rate of $550.00 per external beam treatment billed (currently CPT codes 77372, 77373, 77401 — 77416, 77418 and 77781-77784) and replaces the Addendum of that same Section dated January 1, 2013. The parties acknowledge that Management Services neither provides direct marketing services currently under the Agreement nor does this Amendment provide for Management Services to provide direct marketing services.

 

From and after the date hereof, Section 3.1 shall read as follows:

 

3.1. Service Fee.   For the services to be provided hereunder by MANAGEMENT SERVICES, the PC shall pay to MANAGEMENT SERVICES a monthly Service Fee at the rate of $550.00 per external beam treatment billed (currently CPT codes 77372, 77373, 77401 — 77416, 77418 and 77781-77784). The parties agree that the Service Fee represents the fair market value of the services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES hereunder and that the parties shall meet annually to reevaluate the value of services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES and shall establish the fair market value thereof for purposes of this Section 3.1.

 

 

	
Accepted:
    	
NORTH   CAROLINA RADIATION THERAPY
    
	
 
    	
MANAGEMENT   SERVICES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Bryan J. Carey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Bryan   J. Carey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Vice   President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Accepted:
    	
RADIATION   THERAPY ASSOCIATES OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Daniel   E. Dosoretz, M.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Vice   President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 24, 2020

a1116 

# Order

Clerk November 24, 2020

161111(88)

DAX ELLIOT CARPENTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 161111

COA: 344512

Eaton CC: 2008

- 000929

- DM

JULIE ELIZABETH CARPENTER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 8,

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6329]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Art and Love in Renaissance Italy''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Art and Love in Renaissance Italy'', 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about November 11, 2008, 
until on or about February 16, 2009; and at the Kimbell Art Museum, 
Forth Worth, Texas, from on or about March 15, 2009 until on or about 
June 14, 2009; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: August 15, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-19775 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-77132, 333-96205 and 333-53086 of IGEN International, Inc. on Form S-8 dated
March 31,1994, Form S-3 dated February 4, 2000 and Form S-3 dated January 10.
2001, respectively, of our report dated May 15, 2001 (June 20, 2001 as to Note 4
of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of IGEN International, Inc. for the year ended March 31,
2001.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

McLean, Virginia
June 28, 2001
Order entered August 27, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00856-CR

EX PARTE ALEJANDRO TOVAR

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 11

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MC13-A1095

ORDER

The Court has before it the August 23, 2013 motion of Roberto Alonzo and Dan Wood, 

Jr. to withdraw as appellant’s attorneys. In the motion, Mr. Alonzo and Mr. Wood state that 

although appellant directed them to file a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying 

him habeas corpus relief, appellant has refused to enter a contract for appellate representation. 

Mr. Alonzo and Mr. Wood further state that they are retained, not appointed, counsel for 

appellant. They ask that they be allowed to withdraw or, alternatively, that the appeal be abated 

to determine whether appellant desires to pursue it.

The clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed in this appeal. Appellant’s brief was 

due on August 23, 2013, and the appeal is set for submission without argument on October 11, 

2013. This appeal involves a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding brought under article 

11.072 of the Texas Code of Criminal Proceeding. Appellant is not constitutionally or statutorily 

entitled to appointed counsel in this habeas corpus proceeding. See Ex parte Graves, 70 S.W.3d 
103, 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. art. 11.072 (West 2005) 

(contains no requirement that counsel be appointed for applicant).

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion of Mr. Alonzo and Mr. Wood to withdraw as 

appellant’s attorneys of record. We DIRECT the Clerk to remove Roberto Alonzo and Dan 

Wood, Jr. as appellant’s attorneys of record.

We ORDER Mr. Alonzo and Mr. Wood to send copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s 

records to appellant to allow him to prepare his brief for this appeal. We further ORDER Mr. 

Alonzo and Mr. Wood to provide this Court, within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this order, 

with written verification that they have sent appellant copies of the record.

We ORDER appellant to provide this Court, by SEPTEMBER 9, 2013, with the name, 

State Bar number, and contact information for new retained counsel. If we do not receive the 

name and contact information by the date specified, we will presume appellant is representing 

himself in this appeal.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief in this appeal by SEPTEMBER 23, 2013. We 

ORDER the State to file its brief by OCTOBER 7, 2013. If any party does not file its brief by 

the date specified, the appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief.

The appeal remains set for submission on October 11, 2013.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by Roberto Alonzo, Dan Wood, Jr., 

and Michael Casillas.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Alejandro 

Tovar, 1913 Pembroke Street, Irving, Texas 75060.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD

PRESIDING JUSTICE