alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6314 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to reform the 

contribution system of the Universal Service Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself, Mrs. CAMMACK, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. BERGMAN, 

Ms. DEGETTE, and Ms. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to reform the contribution system of the Universal Service 

Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reforming Broadband 

5 Connectivity Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT. 

7 Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission (re9 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6314 IH

1 (1) conduct a study assessing the need to ex2 pand the contribution base of the Universal Service 

3 Fund to ensure that the contribution requirement 

4 under section 254(d) of the Communications Act of 

5 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(d)) is imposed fairly and equi6 tably; and 

7 (2) submit to Congress a report on the results 

8 of the study conducted under paragraph (1). 

9 SEC. 3. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND CONTRIBUTION SYSTEM 

10 REFORM. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

12 date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall com13 plete a rulemaking to reform the contribution system of 

14 the Universal Service Fund, including by expanding the 

15 contribution base of the Universal Service Fund. 

16 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the rule17 making required under subsection (a), the Commission 

18 shall consider— 

19 (1) the relative equities and burdens of the pro20 posed changes to the contribution system of the Uni21 versal Service Fund with respect to consumers and 

22 businesses; 

23 (2) the impact of the proposed changes to the 

24 contribution system of the Universal Service Fund 

25 on seniors; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6314 IH

1 (3) the findings and recommendations in the re2 port submitted under section 2(2). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,851
<SECURITIES>                                    11,259
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,885
<PP&E>                                         217,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 350,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,626
<BONDS>                                        156,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,611
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   350,665
<SALES>                                         39,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,079
<CGS>                                           35,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    132
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6224 

To prohibit payment of administrative funding to States with a high backlog 

of unprocessed unemployment claims, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. HARDER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit payment of administrative funding to States 

with a high backlog of unprocessed unemployment 

claims, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fix the Unemployment 

5 Backlogs Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE 

7 FUNDING TO STATES WITH HIGH BACKLOG 

8 OF UNPROCESSED UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any State in which 

10 the Secretary of Labor determines, as of the date of enactVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:20 Dec 17, 2021 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6224.IH H6224

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6224 IH

1 ment of this Act, that the number of unprocessed unem2 ployment claims in the State is in excess of 45,000, the 

3 Secretary of Labor shall make no certification for payment 

4 of amounts for unemployment compensation administra5 tion under section 302 of the Social Security Act to such 

6 State at any time following the date that is 180 days after 

7 the date of enactment of this Act unless the Secretary de8 termines at such time that the number of unprocessed un9 employment claims in the State has been reduced to zero. 

10 (b) DEFINITION OF UNPROCESSED UNEMPLOYMENT

11 CLAIM.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘‘un12 processed unemployment claim’’ means, with respect to a 

13 State, a claim for unemployment compensation filed in the 

14 State for which a determination of initial eligibility has 

15 not been made within 21 days of the date of filing. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.5
 
  
 Re:
    
    Evaluation Summary  SEC Pricing
Concho Resources Inc. Interests
Certain Properties in NM, TX, OK and AR
Proved Reserves
As of December 31, 2009
    ProvedProved
    
    
    DevelopedTotal
    
    
    Developed
    
    
    Non-
    
    
    ProvedProved
    
    
    Producing
    
    
    Producing
    
    
    UndevelopedNet ReservesOil/Condensate
    
    - Mbbl
    
    
    119,134.0
    
    
    
    48,398.4
    
    
    
    9,057.2
    
    
    
    61,678.5Gas
    
    - MMcf
    
    
    351,471.8
    
    
    
    167,560.1
    
    
    
    22,051.9
    
    
    
    161,859.9RevenueOil/Condensate
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    6,785,399.0
    
    
    
    2,754,552.3
    
    
    
    514,985.3
    
    
    
    3,515,862.8Gas
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    1,791,628.8
    
    
    
    841,775.4
    
    
    
    113,982.6
    
    
    
    835,871.5Severance Taxes
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    637,456.6
    
    
    
    268,349.9
    
    
    
    48,528.2
    
    
    
    320,578.8Ad Valorem Taxes
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    61,702.4
    
    
    
    27,002.7
    
    
    
    2,771.9
    
    
    
    31,927.9Operating Expenses
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    1,705,886.5
    
    
    
    963,244.8
    
    
    
    39,781.7
    
    
    
    702,860.2Investments
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    1,062,006.1
    
    
    
    0.0
    
    
    
    78,993.1
    
    
    
    983,012.8Operating Income (BFIT)
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    5,109,980.0
    
    
    
    2,337,731.3
    
    
    
    458,893.0
    
    
    
    2,313,354.8Discounted at 10.0%
    
    
    - M$
    
    
    
    2,407,523.0
    
    
    
    1,322,438.9
    
    
    
    211,043.6
    
    
    
    874,041.3




---



##### 



Respectfully submitted,(GRAPHIC)CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693
EXHIBIT 35.1

                         Servicer Compliance Statement
               for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer



                                    JPMorgan

                         Servicer Compliance Statement
                   JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Master Servicer

     A review of the activities of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
for the transactions  listed on the attached Exhibit A, during the calendar year
ending December 31, 2006, and of its performance under the applicable  servicing
agreements has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision.

     To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  servicer  has
fulfilled all of its obligations  under the agreements in all material  respects
throughout the reporting period.


/s/ Kathleen M. McDonnell                       March 9, 2007
-------------------------
Kathleen M. McDonnell
Vice President
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Master Servicing

                                   Exhibit A

         GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-1, Agreement dated January 1, 2006
        GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-3, Agreement dated February 1, 2006
          GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-5, Agreement dated March 1, 2006
         GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4F, Agreement dated April 1, 2006
          GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-6, Agreement dated April 1, 2006
           GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-9, Agreement dated May 1, 2006
          GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-12, Agreement dated July 1, 2006
H. R. 6386 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 450 West 

Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, Illinois, as the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. VETERANS OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN MEMORIAL POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, 

Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq 

and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 572 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 572

  To provide for return of excess amounts from official allowances of 
  Members of the House of Representatives to the Treasury for deficit 
                               reduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1995

Mr. Brown of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Minge, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. 
Farr, Mr. Doyle, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Barrett of 
 Wisconsin, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. Barcia) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for return of excess amounts from official allowances of 
  Members of the House of Representatives to the Treasury for deficit 
                               reduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETURN OF EXCESS AMOUNTS FROM OFFICIAL ALLOWANCES OF MEMBERS 
              OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO THE TREASURY FOR 
              DEFICIT REDUCTION.

    Notwithstanding any other law, or any rule or other authority, any 
amount remaining in an official allowance of a Member of the House of 
Representatives at the end of the session of Congress or other period 
for which the allowance is made available shall be returned to the 
Treasury, to be used for deficit reduction.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``Member of the House of Representatives'' 
        means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident 
        Commissioner to, the Congress; and
            (2) the term ``official allowance'' means, with respect to 
        a Member of the House of Representatives, the Clerk Hire 
        Allowance, the Official Expenses Allowance, or the Official 
        Mail Allowance.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6175 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 135 West Wisconsin Street in Russell, Kansas, 

as the ‘‘Robert J. Dole Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT J. DOLE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 135 West Wisconsin Street in 

7 Russell, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Robert J. Dole Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6175 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert J. Dole Memo5 rial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE ESTATE OF

RODOLFO MORALES, DECEASED.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00334-CV

Appeal from

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2009-P00817)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013.

SUSAN LARSEN, Senior Judge 

Before McClure, C.J., Larsen, J. (Senior), and Barajas, C.J. (Senior)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6333 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6333

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to establish, maintain, or support 
any national database identifying individuals as having received or not 
                         received any vaccine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2021

  Mrs. Lesko introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to establish, maintain, or support 
any national database identifying individuals as having received or not 
                         received any vaccine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR NATIONAL DATABASE IDENTIFYING 
              VACCINATED OR UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUALS.

    No Federal funds may be used to establish, maintain, or support any 
national database identifying individuals as having received or not 
received any vaccine.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1











Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Neuralstem, Inc. (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, I. Richard Garr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1).           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2).           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 16, 2011





/s/ I. Richard Garr


I. Richard Garr


Chief Executive Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6339 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the health coverage 

tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2021 

Mr. TURNER (for himself and Mr. GOLDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the health coverage tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Coverage Tax 

5 Credit Reauthorization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF HEALTH COVERAGE TAX CREDIT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 35(b)(1)(B) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘before 

9 January 1, 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘before January 1, 

10 2026’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6339 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem3 ber 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134802 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134802 

 COA: 277704 

Wayne CC: 95-011960-FY

JERRY ALLEN METCALF, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
#### Arturo Gonzalez, Respondent, v Gigi Rothweiler, Appellant.

[678 NYS2d 502]

In an action to recover rent arrears, the defendant tenant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered June 26, 1997, which, upon an order granting the motion of the plaintiff landlord for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff landlord and against her in the principal sum of $13,380.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a recalculation of damages in accordance herewith.

The instant appeal arises out of a conflict between the plaintiff landlord and the defendant tenant over the defendant’s nonpayment of rent for a 25-month period. A tenant has an independent obligation to pay rent, which continues as long as the tenant remains in possession of the premises *(Earbert Rest. v Little Luxuries,*99 AD2d 734), and on the landlord’s motion for summary judgment at issue herein, he submitted evidence which established a prima facie case that the tenant had failed to pay rent for the time period at issue. The tenant’s opposition *849papers failed to raise a triable issue of fact on this issue. Thus, the landlord was entitled to summary judgment on its claim for past due rent.

However, since the New York State Department of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) has not yet made a final determination as to the amount of the legal regulated rent for the time period in question, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for a recalculation of damages at such time as the DHCR determines the rent. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.