alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6797** 

CHARLES A. RIPPY, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge . ( 5:14

- cv - 00037

- FDW )

Submitted : August 15, 2014 Decided: August 27, 2014

Before GREGORY and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Charles A. Rippy, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles A. Rippy, Jr. , seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s as sessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate b oth that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rippy has not made th e requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis L. Winger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dennis L. Winger     Chief Financial Officer

Date:     November 12, 2003

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                      [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]

                                   Exhibit 15



August 10, 2000


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated July 19, 2000 on our review of interim
financial information of Phelps Dodge Corporation (the "Corporation") for the
period ended June 30, 2000 and included in the Corporation's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 and Form S-3 (Nos.
33-44380 and 333-36415) Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-3 (No.
33-44380), Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442, 33-6141,
33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362, 33-62648, 333-42231,
and 333-52175) and Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-8 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061).


Very truly yours,



/S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 10, 2022
No. 04-22-00562-CV Virley-Leroy SESSION & Donieka-Lenise Session,

Appellants

v. RIATA LAND ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNERS, INC. , Appellee From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-2100-CV-E Honorable Heather H. Wright, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On August 29, 2022, Appellant Virley-Leroy Session filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s final judgment entered on August 8, 2022. When he filed the notice of appeal, this court notified appellant in writing that his notice of appeal had been conditionally filed because the $205.00 filing fee had not been paid. We instructed appellant to pay the fee by September 12, 2022 and cautioned if the fee was not paid, the appeal was subject to being stricken by this court. Appellant has not paid the fee. We therefore order appellant to show cause in writing by October 25, 2022 stating either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) he is entitled to appeal without paying the $205.00 filing fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending the payment of the filing fee. Appellant is further advised he, as a pro se party, cannot represent another party in litigation or on appeal. Accordingly, we identify only Virley-Leroy Session as an appellant in this proceeding.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of October, 2022.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Larry Altringer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Agassiz Energy, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of Governors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:April 16, 2007     /s/ Larry Altringer     Larry Altringer  Treasurer, Governor, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### Ike LA HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VIRGINIA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4465.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1934.

Hardin & Coleman, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Pegues & Pegues, of Mansfield, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case of case No. 4458, on the docket of this court, 156 So. 366, decided this day.

Eor the reasons assigned in case No. 4458, the judgment of the lower court in this case is reversed, and the demands of plaintiff are rejected at his cost, in both courts.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60298 Conference Calendar

__________________ CLAUDIO AVALOS MIRAMONTES, Petitioner,
versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals INS No. A092 919 654
- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * As the petitioner has been deported, his petition for review is DISMISSED. 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c).
**Exhibit        32(a)**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company,                Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  THOMAS M. PATRICK |   |   | August                  9, 2006 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                   |   |   | Date                            |

| /s/                  THOMAS M. PATRICK |   |   | August                  9, 2006 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                   |   |   | Date                            |

| /s/                  THOMAS M. PATRICK |   |   | August                  9, 2006 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                   |   |   | Date                            |
Order entered August 8 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 00107

- CR

JERRELLE LAMAR MOORE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401

- 80973

- 2021

O RDER

Before the Court is court reporter Charla Reamy ’ s August 1, 2022 request

asking the C o urt to accept State ’ s Exhibit 1 on a flash drive. We GRANT the

request and ORDE R State ’ s Exhibit 1 fi led as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of WNS (Holdings) Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Zubin DubashName:
    Zubin DubashTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Public Announcement

    Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409; 
5 U.S.C. 552b)

Agency Holding the Meeting: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

Date and Time: 11 a.m., Thursday, August 28, 2008.

Place: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard 4th Floor, 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

Status: Closed.

Matters Considered: The following matter will be considered during the 
closed meeting: Review of the appointment of a hearing examiner under 
18 U.S.C. 4204(a)(2)(A).

Agency Contact: Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission, (301)492-5990.

    Dated: August 20, 2008.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-19851 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41708 Summary Calendar EFRAIN MALDONADO, JR., Plaint iff- Appellant,

versus DANIEL DICKERSON, Correctional Officer; MARVIN OGLETREE, Correctional Officer; KEVIN BASS, Correctional Officer; JOHNNY THOMPSON, SR., Correctional Officer; STEPHEN FARMER, Defendants-Appellees.

----------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:02-CV-184

----------------------------------------------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ef rain Maldonado, Jr., Texas pri soner # 459751, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights claims as frivo lo us pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A as to defendants Dickerson, Thom pson, Bass, and Farmer and from the grant of summary judgment fo r Ogletree. We review dismissals under § 1915A-2-

de novo. G eiger v. Jowers , 404 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005). We also review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo

. Topalian v. Ehrman , 954 F.2d 1125, 1131 (5th Cir. 1992). Maldonado argues th at the district court erred in dismissing his claims against Dickerson, Thom pson, Bass, and Farmer as frivo lo us. The district court did not err in dismissing the excessiveuse-of-force claims against these defendants fo r lack of p ersonal involvement in a constitutional deprivation. See Thompson v. Steele , 709 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1983). Maldonado failed to set fo rth a nonfrivolous conspiracy claim. S ee K err v. Lyford , 171 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1999). Maldonado has not demonstrated plain error wit h respec t to his failure-to-intervene claim. S ee Craw ford v. Falcon Drilling Co., Inc. , 131 F.3d 1120, 1123 (5th Cir. 1997); cf. Hale v. Tow nley , 45 F.3d 914, 919 (5th Cir. 1995). Maldono argues th at the district court erred in granting summary judgment for Ogletree on his excessive-use-of-force claim. The undisputed facts support the district court’s determination that the fo rce was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline rather than malicio usly and sadistically to cause harm. See Hudson v. McMillian , 503 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1992). Maldonado has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion in the district court’s grant of a protective order as to di scovery. See Richardson v. Henry , 902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir. 1990). AFFIRMED.
213 La. 483

#### STATE v. HARTSON.

No. 38711.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1948.

No attorney for appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Cul-ligan, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and James T. Burns, Dist. Atty., of Covington, for appel-lee.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of receiving stolen things having a value of $85.00, Article 69, Louisiana Criminal Code, and was sentenced to serve two years at hard labor in the penitentiary. He appealed, but filed no brief here and made no appearance before this court.

*25No bill of exception was reserved in the court below, and there is no error patent on the face of the record in this case. Under the law of our state, an appeal taken in a criminal case without the reservation of a bill of exception in the trial court or without error patent on the face of the record presents nothing for review.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 4.4.4
  No.
    
    $[]
  
 SECURITIES ACT RESALE
RESTRICTION TERMINATION DATE ISSUER RULE 144A QIB




---



##### 



ERISA BENEFIT PLAN INVESTOR CODE SECTION 6.2(c) AB INITIO




---



##### 



Issuer provided however However Series 2009-3 Interest Period provided however
 VMS




---



##### 








---



##### 



CHESAPEAKE FUNDING LLCBy:Name:Title:
   THE BANK OF NEW YORK
     MELLON, as Indenture TrusteeBy:Authorized Signatory




---



##### 



Class A Investor Notes Base Indenture Indenture Trustee Series 2009-3 Indenture Supplement Indenture
  Payment Date
   plus Class
A Note Rate One-Month LIBOR




---



##### 



provided however provided further One-Month LIBOR provided finally One-Month LIBOR




---



##### 



et seq Section 6.9




---



##### 



Issuer
    provided Section 6.2




---



##### 



Dated:
    
    By:
    
    
    
    1Signature Guaranteed:
 
 1
    
    NOTE: The signature to this assignment must
correspond with the name of the registered owner as it appears on the face of
the Class A Investor Note, without alteration, enlargement or any change
whatsoever.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K REPORTOFSECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCE LTD PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. 1350(a) and (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. 1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 of
Security Capital Assurance Ltd (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2008/s/ Paul S. GiordanoPAUL S. GIORDANOPRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERSECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCELTDDated: March 17, 2008/s/ David P. SheaDAVID P. SHEAEXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERSECURITY CAPITAL ASSURANCELTD


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Security Capital Assurance Ltd and will be retained by Security Capital Assurance Ltd and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---