alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>                     This schedule contains summary financial
                             information extracted from Hondo Oil & Gas
                             Company's Form 10-Q for the period identified
                             below.  This information is qualified in its
                             entirety by reference to such financial
                             statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<CASH>                                1,140
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,502
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      3,705
<PP&E>                                   20
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               155,008
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             13,798
<OTHER-SE>                         (162,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,111
<SALES>                               3,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      3,069
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    8,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (19,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (19,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     (36,428)
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (55,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (4.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (4.05)
        




















</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



November 6, 2003
                                               /S/ NEAL E. SCHMALE
                                              ______________________
                                               Neal E. Schmale
                                               Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/  David C. MannonDavid C. MannonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis M. Clarke, certify that:

l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Independent BancShares, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

Date: May 23, 2008.



/S/ Dennis M. ClarkeDennis M. Clarke, Chief Financial Officer




2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50744

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SILVERIO MIRANDA-ESPINOZA, also known as Silverio Miranda,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:04-CR-84-1-SS

--------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Silverio MirandaEspinoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit (32)



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I,
Michael H. Thaman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael H. Thaman  
|Chief Financial Officer



May 3, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I**,**David M. Gandossi, Chief Financial Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to Section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the*Securities Exchange Act of 1934*(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: May 10, 2005              /s/ David M. Gandossi   David M. Gandossi   Chief Financial Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MercerInternational Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Daniel Johnson WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Lionel Meadows; Albert L. Meadows; Furney Mundine; Albert H. Brown; Dora Miller; Bayron Green; Lena Brown; Ernestine Brown; Anita B. Brown; Hannah C. Gray; Nelson Dove; Debra Cureton; Phyllis Brown, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF TRENTON, North Carolina; Joffree T. Leggett, Former Mayor of the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; Edward Eubanks; Willard O. Lewis; Charles Jones, Councilmen of the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; C. Glenn Spivey, Town Clerk; McDavid And Associates; Richard Moore, Engineer for the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; Mayor and Council of Trenton, North Carolina; Sylvia A. Willis; Jones County Board of Elections; Richard C. Tyndall, Jr.; James M. Bender, Jr.; Will H. Brock; Gail Lee, and their successors; Susan Camaret, Secretary, Board of Elections; Michael Jenkins, member, Board of Elections and/or their successors; Veterans Administrator for the County of Jones; Jones County, North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees, and State of North Carolina, and its entities; Bill Meyers, Director, North Carolina Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources; Dexter Matthews, Chief, Division of Solid Waste; J. Bobby Blowe, Chief, Construction Grants; James C. Kearney, Director, Rural Economic and Community Development; John H. Hankinson, Jr., Director, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV; Mario Machado, Chief, Construction Grants, their successors and agents; Edwin W. Causey, as Rural Development Manager; Willard R. Dean, as Director of Business and Utilities Division; Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States; Janice M. Cole, Defendants.

No. 02-1510.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 10, 2002.

Decided Nov. 15, 2002.

Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew David Jones, Dunn, Dunn & Stoller, New Bern, North Carolina; James M. Ayers, II, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order entering a pre-filing injunction against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Willis v. Town of Trenton,*Nos. CA-96-6-4; CA-99-116-4; CA-01-13 — 4; CA 01-133-4; CA-01-159-4 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *649legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit
32.3





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James G. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.





/s/ JAMES G. JACKSONJames
      G. JacksonChief
      Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP,
LLC





Dated:
March 2, 2009
#### Lee Byrom v. State.

No. 24500.

January 11, 1950.

*122
      *Charles D. Butts*and *Allen, Locke & Kouri,*Wichita Falls, for appellant.

*Clyde Suddath,*County Attorney, Henrietta, and *George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Upon considering appellant’s motion for rehearing, the opinion approved by this court on the 16th day of November, 1949, is hereby withdrawn and the following substituted in lieu thereof.

This is a conviction for burglary, with punishment assessed at four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The sole question presented for review is whether the jury was guilty of misconduct in commenting upon the failure of the appellant to testify.

Upon the hearing of the motion for new trial, all the jurors testified. This testimony has been brought forward in a bill of exception. It would serve no useful purpose to here detail this testimony. It is sufficient to say that during the deliberation of the jury and before the jurors had reached their verdict as to appellant’s guilt, his failure to testify as a witness in his own behalf was mentioned by one or two members of the jury.

The foreman of the jury immediately called the jurors’ attention to the fact that they were not to mention or consider such fact, and further reference thereto was suppressed.

A casual reference by the jury, during deliberations, to the failure of the accused to testify does not vitiate the verdict. To constitute reversible error, such reference must amount to a discussion by the jurors or be used as a circumstance against the accused. Lovell v. State, 123 Tex. Cr. R. 619, 60 S. W. 2d 208; Graham v. State, 123 Tex. Cr. R. 121, 57 S. W. 2d 850.

The bill complaining of the conduct of the jury was approved by the court who attempted to qualify same. It it noted, however, that exception was taken to such qualification, leaving the bill approved as presented.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### BELL v. EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY ASSUR. CORPORATION, Limited.

No. 14747.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 12, 1934.

For prior opinion, see 152 So. 766.

Edward Rightor and Wm. H. Sellers, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Johnston Armstrong, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The application for rehearing in this case was presented to this court on the 6th day of March, 1934, or more than fifteen calendar days after the rendition of our decision on the 12th day of February, 1934. It was not considered by us because filed too late. See Act No. 16 of 1910. Subsequently a brief was filed by counsel for appellant in which it was insisted that appellant’s application for rehearing should be reconsidered, because, under section. 24, article 7, of the Constitution of 1921, appellant was entitled to notice of decree as provided in the following excerpt: “Notice of all judgments shall be given to counsel of record; and the court shall provide by rule for the giving of such notices. No delays shall run until such notice shall have been given.”'

An examination of this section of the Constitution convinces us that it has no application to the Court of Appeal for the parish of Orleans, since it deals exclusively with the organization and operation of the other two Courts of Appeal of this state. This has always been the view of the judges of this court as demonstrated by the fact that no notice of judgment has ever been given in compliance with this section of the Constitution. See sections 76, 77, 78 and 79.

For these reasons, the contention that we should have considered the application for rehearing is without merit.
LOAN AGREEMENT May 15, 2023  Fairtide Ventures (the “Lender”) of 278 Bay St Suite 102, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 1R8, advanced total of CAD$6,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Red Metal Resources Ltd. (the “Borrower”) of 1130 Pender Street, West, Unit 820, Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4.  The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 8% per year (the “Interest”) from the date of this loan agreement.  The Borrower is liable for repayment of the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.  The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.  LENDERBORROWERFairtide VenturesRed Metal Resources Ltd.Per:Per:/s/ Fairtide Ventures/s/ Joao da CostaFairtide VenturesJoao da Costa, CFO                        PROMISSORY NOTE  Principal Amount:  CAD$6,000May 15, 2023   FOR VALUE RECEIVED Red Metal Resources Ltd., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Fairtide Ventures (the “Lender”) the sum of $6,000 lawful money of Canada (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum accrued from the date of the Loan Agreement, as explicitly specified in that Loan Agreement dated for reference May 15, 2023 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.  For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 8 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Payment Date (for an effective rate of 8.3% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.  The Borrower retains the right but not an obligation, to repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.  The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.   BORROWER Red Metal Resources Ltd.  Per:   /s/ Joao da Costa Joao da Costa, CFO
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1819

_____________________________
T IMOTHY J OHN D ONOVAN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 22, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5); Gilbert v. State
, 315 So. 3d 791 , 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“As Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d) does not provide a vehicle to challenge postconviction appellate counsel’s effectiveness, the petition is dismissed.”).

L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.2 _______________________ ______ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Timothy John Donovan, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 9, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Steven J. Buchanan, Omaha, Nebraska, as a member of Wilber Co. 
Voting Trust; to retain control of Wilber Co., both of Wilber, 
Nebraska, parent of First State Bank, Lincoln, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 19, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-19529 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 764 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 764

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
                                 wage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 1995

   Mr. Wynn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
                                 wage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

    Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
206(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) except as otherwise provided in this section, not 
        less than $4.25 an hour during the period ending 6 months after 
        the date of the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards 
        Amendments of 1995, $4.50 an hour during the succeeding year, 
        $4.75 during the succeeding year, $5.00 during the succeeding 
        year, and $5.25 thereafter;''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6348 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6348

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 
         the national security implications of climate change.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 27, 2021

  Mr. Neguse introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 
         the national security implications of climate change.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Climate Readiness Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT ON NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATIONS 
              OF CLIMATE CHANGE.

    (a) Report Required.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives 
a report on--
            (1) the national security implications associated with 
        climate change; and
            (2) strategies and approaches for responding to climate 
        change.
    (b) Report Elements.--The report required under subsection (a) 
shall include each of the following:
            (1) An overview of how the exacerbation of current global 
        conflicts, the creation of new global conflicts, and increased 
        geopolitical instability due to climate change is likely to 
        affect the national security of the United States.
            (2) An overview of how climate change will affect the 
        resiliency of current missions of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States.
            (3) An overview of the actions the Secretary recommends to 
        address the geopolitical threats to the security of the United 
        States due to climate change.
            (4) A list of the ten most concerning existing or emerging 
        conflicts that pose a risk to United States security that may 
        be exacerbated by climate change.
    (c) Form of Report.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
                                 <all>
```