alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit        32(b)**

| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company,                  Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  THOMAS A. NARDI |   |   | May                  10, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                          |

| /s/                  THOMAS A. NARDI |   |   | May                  10, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                          |

| /s/                  THOMAS A. NARDI |   |   | May                  10, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Date                          |
#### Albert Thompson v. Fleischmann Realty, etc., Company.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137502) pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, 2006 Director Option Plan, and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Riverbed Technology, Inc., of our report dated February 8, 2007,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Riverbed Technology, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

San Francisco,California 

February 8, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6369 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6369

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and 
maintain facilities in the Sun River Project, Montana, for the purpose 
                   of hydroelectric power generation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2022

Mr. Rosendale introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and 
maintain facilities in the Sun River Project, Montana, for the purpose 
                   of hydroelectric power generation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sun River Hydropower Authorization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF SUN RIVER PROJECT, MONTANA.

    (a) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
the Commissioner of Reclamation and pursuant to the reclamation laws, 
may construct, operate, and maintain facilities in the Sun River 
Project, Montana, for the purpose of hydroelectric power generation.
    (b) Effect.--The authorization under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) be in addition to any other authorizations for the Sun 
        River Project under existing law; and
            (2) not limit, restrict, or alter operations of the Sun 
        River Project in a manner that would be adverse to the 
        satisfaction of valid existing water rights or water deliveries 
        to the holder of any valid water service contract.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of China Ruitai International Holdings Co., Ltd. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:
      May 17, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ Gang MaGang
      Ma, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Quarterly Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



April 29, 2004
                                           /S/ STEPHEN L. BAUM
                                         ______________________
                                           Stephen L. Baum
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1 - RooMax Incentive Award






Exhibit 10.1


The Pantry, Inc. Fiscal 2014 RooMax Incentive Award Program
 
The Pantry, Inc. RooMax Incentive Award Program (the “Program”) is an incentive award program for Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), other than the CEO, for the 2014 fiscal year and is in addition to The Pantry’s 2014 Annual Incentive Plan.  The Program provides for the potential of performance-based cash awards to certain of the Company’s employees, including its NEOs (other than the CEO), pursuant to which each NEO would receive an additional one-time payment of $12,500.The Program is designed to provide additional incentives for: 1) the successful launch and execution of work related to certain strategic programs referred to as the Company’s RooMax project, 2) increased engagement of Pantry key leaders in executing the RooMax project, 3) driving EBITDA growth, and 4) creating positive momentum for future growth.  


In order for the Program incentive to be paid out, both a minimum EBITDA level and performance criteria relating to the RooMax project must be met The Program’s performance cycle is concurrent with the Company’s fiscal year.


NEOs who join the Company after September 26, 2013 are not eligible to receive the award.  Participants must be employed on the date awards are paid in order to receive a payout, except that participants whose employment is terminated due to death or disability or as otherwise determined by the Committee in its discretion may have their award amounts prorated and paid on the date other awards are paid in the discretion of the Committee.
#### Judith E. Perez, Respondent, v John R. Velez, Appellant.

[678 NYS2d 525]

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dáted January 28, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the plaintiffs failure to sustain a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The evidence proffered by the defendant, in sworn admis*866sible form *(see, Pagano v Kingsbury,*182 AD2d 268), demonstrated, prima facie, that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Contrary to the conclusion of the Supreme Court, we find that the plaintiff failed to rebut the defendant’s prima facie showing. The affirmation of the plaintiffs expert medical witness was insufficient to establish that the plaintiff suffered a serious injury because it consisted primarily of conclusory assertions tailored to satisfy statutory requirements *(see, Medina v Zalmen Reis & Assocs.,*239 AD2d 394). Moreover, this affirmation does not explain the more than three-year gap between the physician’s July 22, 1994, examination of the plaintiff, just six days after the accident, and his next examination of the plaintiff on November 18, 1997 *(see, Medina v Zalmen Reis & Assocs., supra; Marshall v Albano,*182 AD2d 614). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted *(see, Licari v Elliot,*57 NY2d 230).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, John E. Martin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 11, 2003              
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    John E. Martin                
|John E. Martin                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer



32
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-39478) pertaining to the Koppers Industries,Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Koppers Industries, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Koppers Industries, Inc. Restated and Amended Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Koppers Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

March 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QA3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
April 1, 2006, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  dated
as of March 1, 2006 (as  amended  from  time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential  Accredit Loans, Inc., as company,  Residential Funding Company, LLC
(formerly  Residential Funding  Corporation),  as master servicer,  and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
EX-35 (k)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

JP Morgan Acceptance Corporation I

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust
    2006-A2

 Per Section 11.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 4/1/2006,
 the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
 hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

 (A) a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
 portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or such
 other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, has
 been made under such officer's supervision and

 (B) to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
 has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
 applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, in all
 material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has
 been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
 specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status
 thereof.

 (C) Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the extent
 of any inconsistency, any and all other statements, certifications or
 assertions herein are subject to the following): instances of noncompliance
 related to the subject transaction for the applicable reporting period are
 identified on Schedule A hereto.


Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson Assistant Secretary

(page)

Schedule A

Reporting Errors

During the reporting period, one or more of the monthly investor reports
contained certain types of errors in regard to the calculation and or the
reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets. To the best of the signing
officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been material,
has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has been
disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the reporting
period.



JPMALT 2006-A2
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6392 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the deduction for 

advertising and promotional expenses for prescription drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2022 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself and Mr. TRONE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the 

deduction for advertising and promotional expenses for 

prescription drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Breaks for 

5 Drug Ads Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR ADVERTISING 

7 AND PROMOTIONAL EXPENSES FOR PRE8 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part IX of subchapter B of chap10 ter 1 of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6392 IH

1 (relating to items not deductible) is amended by adding 

2 at the end the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 280I. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR DIRECT4 TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING OF PRESCRIP5 TION DRUGS. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be allowed 

7 under this chapter for expenses relating to direct-to-con8 sumer advertising of prescription drugs for any taxable 

9 year. 

10 ‘‘(b) DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING.—For 

11 purposes of this section, the term ‘direct-to-consumer ad12 vertising’ means any dissemination, by or on behalf of a 

13 sponsor of a prescription drug product (as such term is 

14 defined in section 735(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

15 Cosmetic Act), of an advertisement which— 

16 ‘‘(1) is in regard to such prescription drug 

17 product, and 

18 ‘‘(2) primarily targeted to the general public, 

19 including through— 

20 ‘‘(A) publication in journals, magazines, 

21 other periodicals, and newspapers, 

22 ‘‘(B) broadcasting through media such as 

23 radio, television, and telephone communication 

24 systems, direct mail, and billboards, and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6392 IH

1 ‘‘(C) dissemination on the Internet or 

2 through digital platforms (including social 

3 media, mobile media, web applications, digital 

4 applications, mobile applications, and electronic 

5 applications).’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec7 tions for such part IX of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 is amended by adding after the item relating to sec9 tion 280H the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 280I. Disallowance of deduction for direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

13 ending after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Porter
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Pierce, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                      |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | PORTER BANCORP, INC. |  |                        
|                      |  |  |  |                     
|Dated: March 26, 2007 |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ David B. Pierce     |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |                      |  | David B. Pierce         |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AMANDA JAMES

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00 00 5

- C R

Appeal from the

244th District Court

of Ector County, Texas 1

(TC# C

- 17

- 1110

- CR )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Amanda James has filed a motion to withdraw h er appeal, stating that s he no

longer wishes to proceed with h er appeal

. We construe this as a motion to voluntarily dismiss her

own appeal

. The Court grants Appellant’s motion and dismisses this appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P.

42.2 (governing voluntary dismissals in criminal cases).

April 9, 2020

YVONNE T. ROD RIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

1 We hear this on transfer from the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Eastland. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 41.3.
#### Lewis A. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry DAVIS, Inmate Records; Nurse Hewlitt, Mecklenburg Medical Staff; Lieutenant Nipper, Shift commander, M.C.C.; Major Earley; Ms. Royster, Operation Officer at M.C.C.; Officer Rollston; Officer Loftis, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 02-7128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 14, 2002.

Lewis A. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Frank Fletcher Rennie, IV, Cowan & Owen, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Lewis A. Robinson appeals the district court’s judgment denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Robinson v. Davis,*No. CA-99-1866 (E.D. Va. Jan. *63330, 2002; July 17, 2002). We deny Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*