alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                   SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   (In thousands, except per share data)


                                 QUARTER ENDED      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                 July 31,   Aug. 2,  July 31,  Aug. 2,
                                 2004      2003      2004      2003
                               --------- --------  --------  --------

NET EARNINGS
  Basic net earnings           $  11,712  $  8,147  $ 32,937  $ 24,846
  Add:  Interest on
   Convertible Securities,
   net of tax                        498         -     1,493         -
                                --------   -------   -------   -------
  Diluted net earnings         $  12,210  $  8,147  $ 34,430  $ 24,846
                               =========  ========  ========  ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
 OUTSTANDING
  Basic weighted average common
   shares outstanding             32,113    29,267    31,183    29,250
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed conversion of
   Convertible Subordinated
   Debentures                      1,637         -     1,637         -
  Add:  Shares issuable from
   assumed exercise of options       414       355       413       280
                                --------  --------  --------  --------

  Diluted weighted average
   shares outstanding             34,164    29,622    33,233    29,530
                                ========  ========  ========  ========


NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Basic                         $    .36  $    .28  $   1.06  $    .85
                                ========  ========  ========  ========
  Diluted                       $    .36  $    .28  $   1.04  $    .84
                                ========  ========  ========  ========
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Richard A. Horowitz    |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Horowitz         |   |
| Principal Executive Officer |   |
|                        |   |
|                        |   |
| May 12, 2008           |   |

 

----
#### Joseph Lonzone v. New York Contracting Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
*The Honorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999.

He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3631

___________

In re: Douglas Freeman; Lisa Freeman, *

*

Debtors. *

____________________ *

*

Tod Hall, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

Appellant, * District of Arkansas.

*

v. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Douglas Freeman; Lisa Freeman, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: April 22, 1999

Filed: April 28, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN,* Chief Judge, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the record in the context of Tod Hall's contentions, we

conclude the bankruptcy court and the district court correctly held the indebtedness in
-2-

question was dischargeable, and an extended discussion is unnecessary. We affirm for

the reasons stated in the bankruptcy and the district court's rulings. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          33,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,846
<INVENTORY>                                    155,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,695
<PP&E>                                       5,771,239
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,539,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,987,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          360,139
<BONDS>                                      2,210,526
<COMMON>                                        43,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     903,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,987,265
<SALES>                                      1,771,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,877,609
<CGS>                                        1,071,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,101,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               248,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,704
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            105,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   105,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.27
        


</TABLE>
Pacific Enterprises is today filing with the Commission its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003.

	To accompany the report we are enclosing the statements of
Pacific Enterprises' Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as created by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



May 5, 2003
                                           /s/ Stephen L. Baum
                                         ______________________
                                           Stephen L. Baum
                                           Chief Executive Officer





Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



May 5, 2003
                                               /s/ Neal E. Schmale
                                              ______________________
                                               Neal E. Schmale
                                               Chief Financial Officer
<table>

                                       EXHIBIT 12.2
                            SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (Dollars in millions)
<caption>
                                                                             For the six
                                                                             months ended
                                                                             June 30,
                                1999        2000        2001        2002        2003
                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------

                           <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>
Fixed Charges:

Interest                          $ 62        $ 72        $ 70        $ 47        $ 26
Interest portion of
  annual rentals                     3           4           3           2           1
                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Total fixed charges
  for purpose of ratio            $ 65        $ 76        $ 73        $ 49        $ 27
                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Earnings:

Pretax income from
  continuing operations           $383        $390        $377       $391         $171
Add: Total fixed charges
  (from above)                      65          76          73         49           27
                              --------    --------    --------    -------    ---------
Total earnings for
  purpose of ratio                $448        $466        $450       $440         $198
                              ========    ========    ========    =======    =========
Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges                6.89        6.13        6.16       8.98         7.33
                              ========    ========    ========    =======    =========


</table>
<PAGE>                     - 31 -               Exhibit (11)
                              
               OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              
              COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
                              
                                              Quarter Ended
                                                March 31,
                                              1998     1997
                                         (In millions of dollars,
                                            except share data)
Basic:

Net income                                $      8     $     42

Basic weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding (thousands)            53,373       52,408

Basic per share amount                    $    .16     $    .80

Diluted:

Net income                                $      8     $     44

Weighted average number of common 
  shares outstanding (thousands)            53,373       52,408
Weighted average common equivalent
  shares (thousands):
  Deferred awards                              352          353
  Stock options using the average
     market price during the period            120          472
  Shares from assumed conversion
     of preferred securities                     -        4,566

Diluted weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding and
  common equivalent shares (thousands)      53,845       57,799

Diluted per share amount                   $   .16     $    .76
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cory Turner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Clean Power Concepts Inc., certify that;



(1)

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Clean Power Concepts Inc.;



(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3)

Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4)

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



(5)

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:October 15, 2007/s/ Cory TurnerBy:Cory TurnerTitle:Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-1295

_____________________________

RICHARD E. WILSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

October 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for 

postconviction relief, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of 

mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2024).
2

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Richard E. Wilson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau 

Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Richard A. Horowitz

Richard A. Horowitz
Principal Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
----

----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                  Brittany                  Prager |   |   |   |   |
| Brittany                  Prager                      |   |   |   |   |
| Chief                  Executive Officer              |   |   |   |   |
| November                2, 2007                       |   |   |   |   |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142571 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142571 

 COA: 291016 

Wayne CC: 08-014944-FC 

DESHAWN CARY HENDRIX, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
F
I R S T   A M E N D E D   A N D   R E S T A T E
D


C
O N V E R T I B L E   P R O M I S S O R Y   N O T
E





$24,973.85


January
1, 2008


Denver, Colorado





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PARK-PREMIER MINING
COMPANY, a Utah corporation ("Maker"), hereby promises to pay to the order of
Lee Family or its assigns ("Holder"), at 1708 Essex Court, St. Charles, Illinois
60174 or at such other place Holder may from time to time designate in writing,
in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum of Twenty
Four Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy Three and 85/100 US Dollars ($24,973.85),
together with interest commencing January 1, 2007 on the unpaid balance at the
rate of Twelve Percent (12%) per annum. “Maturity Date” means December 31,
2009.  This instrument amends, restates and replaces in full the
Convertible Promissory Note by Maker dated January 1, 2007 in the face amount of
$24,973.85.





This Note
may be converted, in whole or in part, into shares of Maker's common stock at
the conversion price of $.10 per share or such other conversion price as the
board of directors of Maker may deem appropriate, not in excess of $.10 per
share, at any time prior to the full payment hereof, at the Holder's
option.





This Note
is subject to prepayment in whole or in part, upon ten (10) days prior written
notice to Holder, at the option of Maker without penalty but subject to exercise
of Holder’s conversion rights.  Prepayments shall be applied first to
collection expenses, interest accrued and then to principal due
hereunder.





In case
this Note shall not be paid in full whenever it shall become due, the Maker
agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection, including reasonable
attorney's fees, not to exceed 15% of the unpaid balance.





All
rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Colorado, without application of its choice or conflict of law principles. If
any part of the assets or capital stock of Maker is sold or transferred without
Holder’s prior written consent, except sales and transfers in the ordinary
course of business and except transfers by devise, descent or by operation of
law upon the death of a joint tenant: (1) Holder may, at Holder’s option,
declare all the sums due under this Note to be immediately due and payable, and
(2) if the sale or transfer involves substantially all of the assets of Maker,
the transferee shall be deemed to have assumed all of the obligations of Maker
under this Note. This Note is unsecured.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has signed this Note effective as of the date first
above written.





Description:  Unreimbursed
Expenses


PARK-PREMIER
MINING COMPANY








By:/s/ Robert W.
Dunlap


Robert W. Dunlap,
President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 24, 2019

No. 04-19-00285-CR

Terence W. SPENCER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR1677

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk 

file an electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the 

following documents:

1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and 

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk 

of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court 

clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court