alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  COUNTERSIGNED:
  AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (New York, NY) TRANSFER
  AGENT BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER QUINTANA SHIPPING LTD . Specimen SHARES QUINTANA
  SHIPPING LTD. QSL INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL
  ISLANDS SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUS I P 6 8 3 7 5 N 1 0 3 THIS IS
  TO CERTIFY THAT IS THE OWNER OF FULLY-PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF
  COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF QUINTANA SHIPPING LTD.
  transferable on the books of the Corporation by said owner in person or by
  duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly
  endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer
  Agent and Registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation
  and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: MARSHALL
  ISLANDS VIKTORIA POZIOPOULOU HEAD LEGAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY ELEFTHERIOS A.
  PAPATRIFON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

  






 















	
  

  	
  For value
  received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto The following abbreviations,
  when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
  construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
  laws or regulations: Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in
  the above list. TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN as tenants in common as tenants by the
  entireties as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
  common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT –– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to
  Minors Act (State) __ __ __ PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS,
  INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) shares Attorney of the common stock
  represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
  and appoint to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
  Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated
  Signature(s) Guaranteed: THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
  GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND
  CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION
  PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
  MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
  IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
  WHATEVER. NOTICE: Specimen
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6423 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting the scoring 

of preventive health savings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2022 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting 

the scoring of preventive health savings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SCORING OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SAVINGS. 

4 Section 202 of the Congressional Budget and Im5 poundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(h) SCORING OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SAVINGS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) DETERMINATION BY THE DIRECTOR.— 

9 Upon a request by the chairman or ranking minority 

10 member of the Committee on the Budget, the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 15:57 Jan 21, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6423.IH H6423

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6423 IH

1 mittee on Finance, or the Committee on Health, 

2 Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, or by 

3 the chairman or ranking minority member of the 

4 Committee on the Budget, the Committee on Energy 

5 and Commerce, or the Committee on Ways and 

6 Means of the House of Representatives, the Director 

7 shall determine if a proposed measure would result 

8 in reductions in budget outlays in budgetary out9 years through the use of preventive health and pre10 ventive health services. 

11 ‘‘(2) PROJECTIONS.—If the Director determines 

12 that a measure would result in substantial reduc13 tions in budget outlays as described in paragraph 

14 (1), the Director— 

15 ‘‘(A) shall include, in any projection pre16 pared by the Director, a description and esti17 mate of the reductions in budget outlays in the 

18 budgetary outyears and a description of the 

19 basis for such conclusions; and 

20 ‘‘(B) may prepare a budget projection that 

21 includes some or all of the budgetary outyears, 

22 notwithstanding the time periods for projections 

23 described in subsection (e) and sections 308, 

24 402, and 424. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6423 IH

1 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this sub2 section— 

3 ‘‘(A) the term ‘budgetary outyears’ means 

4 the 2 consecutive 10-year periods beginning 

5 with the first fiscal year that is 10 years after 

6 the budget year provided for in the most re7 cently agreed to concurrent resolution on the 

8 budget; and 

9 ‘‘(B) the term ‘preventive health’ means an 

10 action that focuses on the health of the public, 

11 individuals, and defined populations in order to 

12 protect, promote, and maintain health and 

13 wellness and prevent disease, disability, and 

14 premature death that is demonstrated by cred15 ible and publicly available evidence from epide16 miological projection models, clinical trials, ob17 servational studies in humans, longitudinal 

18 studies, and meta-analysis.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Intelligent
Buying, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 28, 2012 |                            
|-------------------- | ---------------------------
|                     |                            
|                     | /s/ David Gorodyansky      
|                     |                            
|                     | David Gorodyansky          
|                     | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC. and will be retained by INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
BELL'S  QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                    83,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          2,544,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             210,000
<INVENTORY>                                                    0 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       3,095,000
<PP&E>                                                29,100,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        17,344,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        15,467,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  4,449,000
<BONDS>                                                5,348,000
<COMMON>                                                 225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                             3,307,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          15,467,000
<SALES>                                                        0 <F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       4,843,000
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,833,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       1,086,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         148,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       219,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (395,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (121,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (274,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                342,000
<NET-INCOME>                                              68,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
<FN>
<F1> THIS AMOUNT IS IMMATERIAL.
<F2> NET SALES OF  TANGIBLE  PRODUCTS  IS NOT MORE  THAN 10% OF TOTAL  OPERATING
REVENUES  AND  THEREFORE  HAS NOT  BEEN  STATED  SEPARATELY  IN THE  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
THIS AMOUNT IS INCLUDED IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES' TAG.
<F3> COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IS INCLUDED IN COST OF SERVICES AND PRODUCTS IN
THE FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG,  PURSUANT TO REGULATION 2-X,
RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellant,

v.

A.M., a child

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2561

[ October 7, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carlos S. Rebollo , Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 4196DL10A

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public

Defe nder, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The circuit court improperly dismissed this case prior to an adjudicatory hearing. See § 985.0301(6), Fla. Stat. (2013); State v. J.C.

, 141 So. 3d 756, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); State v. W.D. , 112 So. 3d 702, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). However, because appellee has attained the age of 19, we dismiss the appeal. See State v. E.I. , 114 So. 3d 309, 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

G ROSS

, T

AYLOR

, JJ., and S HEPHERD
, C AROLINE , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Quarterly Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



November 2, 2005
                                           /S/ STEPHEN L. BAUM
                                         ______________________
                                           Stephen L. Baum
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
3.4  CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT  OF  CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION  OF  NMS
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION  Pursuant to Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, NMS Communications
Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware (the Corporation), does hereby certify as follows:  The name of the Corporation is NMS Communications
Corporation and the Corporations original Certificate of Incorporation was
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on December 12,
1983 under the name Natural Microsystems Corporation. The Board of Directors of
the Corporation has duly adopted a resolution pursuant to Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware setting forth a proposed
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and declaring
said amendment to be advisable and in the best interests of the stockholders of
the Corporation. The requisite stockholders of the Corporation have duly approved
said proposed amendment in accordance with Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. The amendment amends the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation as follows:  Article I is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:  The name of this corporation is LiveWire Mobile, Inc.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its Chief Executive Officer this 5thday of
December, 2008.  NMS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONBy:
  /s/ Joel HughesName: Joel HughesTitle: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1.


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








We,
Juhani Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer, and Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting
Officer, of Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based
upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period March 31, 2009
of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








Date:
            
            May
      15, 2009
            
            By:
            /s/  Juhani
      TaskinenJuhani
      Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer





By:
            /s/  Trupti
      MehtaTrupti
      Mehta, Chief Accounting Officer/CFO








* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### William L. Tadlock v. State.

No. 24644.

February 8, 1950.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1950.

*435
      *Tom M. Shaw,*Dallas, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction under what is commonly called the hot check law. Art. 567b, Vernon’s P. C. The punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment, insisting that the offense charged was under another and different statute which had been repealed. We do not so construe the indictment. The offense charged was under Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann. P. C.

There are no bills of exception.

The facts reflect that appellant obtained from the injured party a load of lumber for which he gave a check for $479.82. The check was not paid by the bank, as appellant did not, at the time, have on deposit in the bank sufficient funds with which to pay the check.

Such facts showed a prima facie case of guilt of the offense as charged.

The jury rejected appellant’s defense of good faith.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, P. J. Absent.

Opinion approved by the court.

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The sole contention made in appellant’s motion for rehearing, in addition to that presented on original submission, is that the indictment does not comply with the law. We have carefully *436examined this and find ourselves unable to agree with the contention made.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 16375 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16

- cr - 00087

- UA

- MRM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JUSTIN HOLIFIELD, Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________ __ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (March 30, 2017) Before TJOFLAT , MARCUS and WILSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-16375 Date Filed: 03/30/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Justin Holifield in this direct criminal appeal from the revocation of his supervised release , has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that cou nsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Holifield’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 16-16375 Date Filed: 03/30/2017 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                      15,358,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,068,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,175,000
<INVENTORY>                                 64,108,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           130,131,000
<PP&E>                                      66,836,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,137,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             176,300,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,170,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        99,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 118,393,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               176,300,000
<SALES>                                    102,535,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,535,000
<CGS>                                       65,146,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,662,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,083,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,742,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,341,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,341,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
 March 31,
    
    
    December 31,2006
    
    
    2005Short-term debt
    
    $
    27.1
    
    
    
    14.3Current portion of long-term debt
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    2.5Long-term debt
    
    
    674.8
    
    
    
    677.7Total debt
    
    
    704.4
    
    
    
    694.5Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    1,019.0
    
    
    
    915.9Shareholders equity
    
    
    5,584.4
    
    
    
    5,601.6Total capitalization
    
    $
    7,307.8
    
    
    
    7,212.0Ratio of total debt to total capitalization
    
    
    9.6
    %
    
    
    9.6
    %
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Blue Exploration, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: September 17, 2007


/s/ Larry Sostad
----------------------------------
Larry Sostad, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 643 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 643

 To extend the effectiveness of an exemption from the requirements of 
         the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 1995

 Mr. Thompson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the effectiveness of an exemption from the requirements of 
         the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MANAGEMENT INTERLOCKS EXEMPTION.

    (a) Extension.--Section 206 of the Depository Institution 
Management Interlocks Act (12 U.S.C. 3205) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by striking 
        ``for a period of, subject to the requirements of subsection 
        (c), 20 years after the date of enactment of this title'' and 
        inserting ``, subject to the requirements of subsection (c)''; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and subject to the requirements 
                of subsection (c)'' after ``Effective on the date of 
                enactment of this title''; and
                    (B) by striking the last sentence.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```