alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Mark A. Imes, certify that: 

l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Independent BancShares, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

Date: March 28, 2008.
EXHIBIT 34.5


    Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for
                  U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian




Ernst & Young LLP
220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

Phone: (612) 343-1000
www.ey.com


             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion,  included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance  with SEC Regulation AB Servicing  Criteria,  that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate  Trust Asset Backed  Securities  platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended  December  31, 2006,  except for criteria  1122(d)(1)(i),
1122 (d)(1)(iii),  1122(d)(2)(i) through 1122(d)(2)(vii),  1122(d)(3)(i) through
1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not  applicable to the activities  performed by them with respect
to the servicing platform covered by this report.  Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was concluded in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis,  evidence  about the Company's  compliance  with the applicable
servicing  criteria  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary in the  circumstances.  Our examination  included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform,  testing of less than all of the servicing  activities  related to the
Platform,   and  determining   whether  the  Company  processed  those  selected
transactions  and performed  those  selected  activities in compliance  with the
servicing  criteria.  Furthermore,  our procedures  were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report.  Our procedures  were not designed to determine  whether
errors may have  occurred  either prior to or  subsequent  to our tests that may
have  affected  the  balances or amounts  calculated  or reported by the Company
during the period  covered by this report for the selected  transactions  or any
other transactions.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal  determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
afore-mentioned  servicing  criteria as of and for the year ended  December  31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
----------------------
February 26, 2007
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Arotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Ehrlich, Chairman and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.









By:  /s/
      Robert S. Ehrlich


Robert
      S.
      Ehrlich


Chairman
      and CEO


(Chief
      Executive Officer)





Date:
      March 31, 2006
FIG-EX10.20_2014.3.31-Q1






EXHIBIT 10.20


JOINDER


This JOINDER (this "Joinder") to the Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2011 (the "Exchange Agreement"), by and among FIG Corp., a Delaware corporation, FIG Asset Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Fortress Operating Entity I LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Principal Holdings I LP, a Delaware limited partnership, and Peter Briger, Jr., Wesley Edens, Robert Kauffman, Randal Nardone and Michael Novogratz is made as of March 12, 2014, by FOE II (New) LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("FOE II").
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, FOE II was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of FIG Corp.; and 
WHEREAS, FIG Corp. has required FOE II to execute and deliver this Joinder pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Exchange Agreement.  
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the agreements contained herein, FOE II hereby agrees as follows:


Section 1.1    Definitions.  To the extent capitalized words used in this Joinder are not defined in this Joinder, such words shall have the meaning set forth in the Exchange Agreement.
Section 1.2    Joinder.  Effective as of June 12, 2012, FOE II hereby acknowledges and agrees to become a "Partnership" (as defined in the Exchange Agreement) for all purposes of the Exchange Agreement and to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Exchange Agreement.
Section 1.3    Notice.  All notices, requests, consents and other communications hereunder to FOE II shall be deemed to be sufficient if contained in a written instrument delivered in person or sent by facsimile (provided a copy is thereafter promptly delivered as provided in this Section 1.3) or nationally recognized overnight courier, addressed to FOE II at the address or facsimile number set forth below or such other address or facsimile number as may hereafter be designated in writing by FOE II:
FOE II (New) LP
c/o Fortress Investment Group LLC
1345 Avenue of the Americas 
            46th Floor 
            New York, NY 10105 
            (T) (212) 798-6100
(F) (917) 591-8433
Section 1.4    Governing Law.  THIS JOINDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE (WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF).  
[Signature Page Follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Joinder has been duly executed and delivered by FOE II as of the date first above written.




FOE II (NEW) LP, a limited partnership


By: FIG CORP., its general partner






By: /s/ Daniel Bass________________
Name: Daniel Bass    
Title: Chief Financial Officer








































































Signature Page for Joinder by  FOE II (New) LP
to the Exchange Agreement
#### Scott L. CHAMNESS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dennis HOCKADAY, RespondentAppellee.

No. 01-3543.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 23, 2002.*

Decided Nov. 5, 2002.

Before FAIRCHILD, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

*

 After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Scott Chamness, an Illinois prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district *court*dismissed the petition as untimely, but granted Chamness a certificate of appealability (“CA”) limited to the issue “whether lockdowns at his prison unconstitutionally denied him his right to file his § 2254 petition by denying him, ‘access to the prison law library and other legal-related paraphanelia (sic).”’ We agree that Chamness’s petition was late and affirm.1

*322Chamness argues that the district court erred by holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) did not apply to determine the deadline for filing his petition; he asserts that the section should have applied because prison lockdowns hindered his access to the courts. His argument fails for two reasons. First, Chamness has not demonstrated that the lockdowns caused him an actual injury because he has not explained how the alleged denial of access to the library prevented him from timely filing his petition. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 350-51, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996); *Akins v. United States,*204 F.3d 1086, 1090 (11th Cir.), *cert. denied,*531 U.S. 971, 121 S.Ct. 410, 148 L.Ed.2d 316 (2000). Second, he has not alleged that the prison lockdowns were instituted for any improper purpose and thus were unconstitutional. *See Lewis,*518 U.S. at 361-62 (lockdowns that cause prisoners delays in receiving legal materials “are not of constitutional significance” as long as they are “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.”); *Akins,*204 F.3d at 1090.

None of Chamness’s other arguments convince us that the district court erred in determining that his petition was untimely, and we decline to expand the CA to encompass those issues.

AFFIRMED.

1

. In its brief, the state argues that the district court improvidently granted a CA in this matter because the issue identified in the CA does not demonstrate “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). As we have repeatedly held, however, any challenge to a CA presented in the state's merits brief is too late; if the state wishes to challenge a CA, it must do so before briefing begins. *See, e.g., Gilmore v. Bertrand,*301 F.3d 581, 582 n. 1 (7th Cir.2002); *Cage*v. *McCaughtry,*305 F.3d 625, 626 (7th Cir.2002) (parties must seek to modify CA before briefing begins). Since the government's challenge is untimely, we proceed to review the question identified in the CA.
Exhibit (32)

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), I, David T. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David T. Brown     
|Chief Executive Officer

August 4, 2006
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





________________








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT,


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF


THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934








DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported):  March 17, 2011








CHYRON CORPORATION


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








New York
01-09014
11-2117385(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)








5 Hub DriveMelville, New York
11747(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)








Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 845-2000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition





On March 17, 2011, Chyron Corporation issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2010. A copy of the press release, including its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three months and years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.





Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(c) Exhibits





99.1           Press Release of Chyron Corporation dated March 17, 2011.











SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CHYRON CORPORATION





By:
/s/ Jerry KieliszakName:
Jerry KieliszakTitle:
Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Exhibit No.
Description99.1
Press Release, dated March 17, 2011.











Date: March 17, 2011
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6500 

To temporarily allow a deduction for the trade or business expenses of 

employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2022 

Mr. MORELLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To temporarily allow a deduction for the trade or business 

expenses of employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Office Deduc5 tion Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY DEDUCTION FOR TRADE OR BUSINESS 

7 EXPENSES OF EMPLOYEES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6500 IH

1 (1) the qualified employee trade or business de2 ductions of any taxpayer for any taxable year shall 

3 not be treated as itemized deductions, and 

4 (2) in the case of an taxpayer who does not 

5 elect to itemize such taxpayer’s deductions for any 

6 taxable year, the taxable income of such taxpayer for 

7 such taxable shall be reduced by the qualified em8 ployee trade or business deductions of such taxpayer 

9 for such taxable year. 

10 (b) QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE TRADE OR BUSINESS DE11 DUCTIONS.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘quali12 fied employee trade or business deductions’’ means so 

13 much of the deductions allowed by section 162 of the In14 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (determined without regard 

15 to section 67(g) of such Code) as are attributable to 

16 amounts paid or incurred— 

17 (1) in the trade or business of being an em18 ployee, and 

19 (2) during the period beginning on March 13, 

20 2020, and ending on December 31, 2022. 

21 (c) PHASE-OUT BASED ON MODIFIED ADJUSTED

22 GROSS INCOME.— 

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxpayer 

24 for any taxable year, the amount of qualified em25 ployee trade or business deductions taken into acVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:19 Jan 26, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6500.IH H6500

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6500 IH

1 count under subsection (a) (determined without re2 gard to this subsection) shall be reduced (but not 

3 below zero) by the amount which bears the same 

4 ratio to the amount of such deductions (as so deter5 mined) as— 

6 (A) the excess of— 

7 (i) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted 

8 gross income for such taxable year, over 

9 (ii) $200,000 ($400,000 in the case of 

10 a joint return), bears to 

11 (B) $50,000 ($100,000 in the case of a 

12 joint return). 

13 (2) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—For 

14 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘‘modified ad15 justed gross income’’ means the adjusted gross in16 come of the taxpayer (as defined in section 62 of the 

17 Internal Revenue Code of 1986) for the taxable year 

18 increased by any amount excluded from gross in19 come under sections 911, 931, and 933 of such 

20 Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gardner Denver, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Helen W. Cornell, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


                                              /s/ Helen W. Cornell
                                              --------------------------
                                                  Helen W. Cornell
                                                  Vice President, Finance and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Gardner Denver, Inc.
                                                  March 15, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUCCHESE BOOT CO., BARTOLO

MATA, AND RIGOBERTO

GUTIERREZ

,

Appellant ’s

,

v.

JOSE SOLANO

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00 2 29

- C V

Appeal from the

34 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2007

- 1198 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ant’s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until October 26

, 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELL ANT ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Steven L. Hughes , the Appell ant ’s attorney, prepare

the Appell ant ’s brief and forward the same to this Cour t on or before October 26 , 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th day of October , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM