alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Claudine Johnson, Program Operations Assistant,                         *telephone:*                         770-488-3629 or Barry Brooks, Administrative Team Leader,                         *telephone:*                         770-488-3641, Division of Environmental Emergency Health Services, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Mailstop F-60, Atlanta, Georgia 30341                         *telephone:*                         770-488-3300, fax: 770-488-3635.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: August 7, 2008. 

Daniel Riedford, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E8-19044 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">NYS Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of BARBARA GREENE, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered November 20, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs. </p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that it had fully paid plaintiff for the services at issue in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule. The Civil Court granted defendant's motion.</p><p>Plaintiff argues on appeal, as it did in the Civil Court, that defendant failed to establish that its fee schedule reductions were proper. We disagree and find that defendant demonstrated that it had fully paid plaintiff for the services at issue in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors (<a href="../2009/2009_29467.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co.</i>, 26 Misc 3d 23</a>, 24 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2009] ["we hold, as a matter of law, that an insurer may use the workers' compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors to determine the amount which a licensed acupuncturist is entitled to receive for such acupuncture services"]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: September 19, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Wayne
McAlister, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ G. Wayne McAlister 
|                     |  | G. Wayne McAlister     
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET,
AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,862
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          6
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             863
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           340
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,262
<COMMON>                                         1,072
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 13
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,069
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  70
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      105
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,853
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,262
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,796
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               110
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,479
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,589
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            207
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  (4)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     203
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            70
<NET-INCOME>                                       133
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      130
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           100
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           41
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             281
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16

- 1662

____________

RONALD EDWARD GILLETTE,

Appellant

v.

ACTING WARDEN DIANE PROSPER;

JULIUS WILSON, in his capacity as the Director of Prisons;

TERRITORY OF VIRGIN ISLANDS;

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

____________

On Appeal from the

District Court of the Virgin Islands

(D.C. No. 1

- 14

- cv

- 00110)

District Judge: Honorable Wilma A. Lewis

____________

Argued December 12, 2016

Befo re: CHAGARES, JORDAN, and HARDIMAN,

C ircuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion filed June 2, 2017 is hereby amended to reflect the current firm and

address information for counsel for appellant Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III. The opinion is

amended as follows:

Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III (Argued)

Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III P.A.

633 SE Third Avenue, Suite 301

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Jeffrey J. Molinaro

Fuerst Ittleman David & Joseph, PL1001 Brickell Bay Drive, 32nd Floor

Miami, FL 33131

Counsel for Plaintif

f

- Appellant

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date : June 5, 2017
EXHIBIT 35.3

      Servicer Compliance Statement for Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as Servicer




                                 AVELO MORTGAGE


Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C.
600 E. Las Colinas Blvd. Suite 620
Irving, TX 75039
P: 972.910.7000
F: 972.910.7099

Annual Compliance Statement

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage,  L.L.C.'s ("Avelo")  servicing
activities and its performance  under the servicing  agreement during the period
from  February 24, 2006 through  December  31, 2006.  This review was  completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its  obligations  under  the  agreement  in all  material  respects,  except  as
described in the item below:

For a period  of time in 2006,  bank  accounts  were not  reconciled  in  strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed securities,
related bank accounts,  including  custodial  accounts and related bank clearing
accounts.  These reconciliations are (A) mathematically  accurate;  (B) prepared
within 30 calendar  days after the bank  statement  cutoff  date,  or such other
number  of days  specified  in the  transaction  agreements;  (C)  reviewed  and
approved by someone other than the person who prepared the  reconciliation;  and
(D) contain  explanations for reconciling  items.  These  reconciling  items are
resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification, or such other
number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

The bank account  reconciliations  were current as of December 31, 2006,  and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.

                                       /s/ James Weston Moffett
                                       ------------------------
                                Name:  James Weston Moffett
                                Title: President and CEO
                                Date:  February 28, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-033
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis L. Winger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/Dennis L. Winger
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 44974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of Army

[Docket ID: USA-2008-0049]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army is deleting a system of records in 
its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 
1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed actions will be effective without further notice 
on September 2, 2008 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Department of the Army, Records 
Management and Declassification Agency, Privacy Division, 7701 
Telegraph Road, Alexandria, VA 22315.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicki Short at (703) 428-6508.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Army systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The Department of Army proposes to delete a system of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or 
altered systems reports.

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
A0055-355a DALO

System name:
    Local transportation Authorization and Use Files (February 22, 
1993, 58 FR 10002).

Reason:
    These records are no longer collected or maintained by Army G-4, 
they are covered under Privacy Act System of Records Notice T7334, 
Defense Travel System (September 8, 2004, 69 FR 54272).

[FR Doc. E8-17602 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### William F. Lynn, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
#### Dennis Doyle, Appellant, *v.*James C. Foster, Respondent.

(No. 2.)

First Department,

October 23, 1908.

(See head note in *Doyle*v. *Foster, No. 1, ante,,*p. 279.)

Appeal by the plaintiff, Dennis Doyle, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of March, 1908, upon. the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court at the close of plaintiff’s case upon a trial at the New York Trial Term.

*I. Henry*Harris, for the appellant.

*William S. Cogswell,*for the respondent.

Ingraham, J.:

The same question is presented in this case as in the case of *Doyle*v. *Foster, No. 1*(128 App. Div. 279), decided herewith. For the reasons there stated the judgment appealed from must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the'appellant to abide the event.

Patterson, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.
May 9, 2000

Dawn R. Johnston

Chief Financial Officer

Chyron Corporation

5 Hub Drive

Melville, New York 11747

Dear Ms. Johnston:

Reference is made to the Loan Agreement dated March 29, 1999, among Chyron Corporation ("Chyron") and AmSouth Bank (the "Bank").  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.

(I) The Bank has agreed to amend the provisions of Section 6.1(a) of the Loan Agreement as follows;

Period		Minimum Quarterly EBITDA

Q1 2000		($245,000)



All other testing thereafter will remain in effect per the Credit Agreement.

(II) The Bank has agreed to waive its rights with respect to the FQE March 2000 EBITDA Covenant defaults.

This will confirm the Bank's consent to the terms and conditions as set forth above.  Nothing in this letter shall constitute a waiver of any future Default or Event of Default under the Agreement (including any default in payment of principal resulting from restrictions on availability of Revolving Credit Loans) or a waiver of any right or remedy the Bank may have with respect to any such future Default or Event of Default.

If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our agreement please so indicate by executing this letter in the space provided below and returning a copy to the Agent.

|Very truly yours,       
|------------------------
|AMSOUTH BANK            
|                        
|By: /s/ Barry S. Renow  
|Barry S. Renow          
|                        
|Its: Attorney-In-Fact   
|                        
|Acknowledged and Agreed:
|                        
|CHYRON CORPORATION      
|                        
|By: /s/ Dawn Johnston   
|Dawn Johnston           
|                        
|Its: CFO                
|                        
|
Filed 3/23/16 In re Ruth D. CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re RUTH D., a Person Coming Under

the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RUTH D.,

Defendant and Appellant. D0 68905

(Super. Ct. No. J237416)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert J.

Trentacosta, Judge. Affirmed.

David R . Greifinger for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In July 2015 a petition was filed in the juvenile court alleging that Ruth D. (the

Minor) possessed methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377 , subd. (a) ), a

misdemeanor. It was also alleged the Minor possessed paraphernalia related to toba cco

and controlled substances (Pen. Code, § 308, subd. (b)), an infraction.2

The Minor was granted informal supervision pursuant to Welfare and Institutions

Code section 654.2. The court ordered the Minor to submit to a drug test to establish a

baseline

.

The Minor filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v

. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) indicating he has been unable to identify any reasonably arguable

issue for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks this c ourt to review the record for error as

mandated by Wende. We offered the Minor the opportunity to file her own brief on

appeal, however, the Minor has not responded. 1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On June 1 , 2015 police stopped the Minor and several friends in a ca r about

3:30 a.m. Police discovered methamphetamine in the Minor ' s purse.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has not identified any reasonably arguable

issues for reversal of the juvenile court ' s order. In order to assist this court in our r eview

of the record, and as required by Anders v

. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 ( Anders ),

appellate counsel has identified the following possible, but not reasonably arguable issue:

Whether the juvenile court abused its discretion in ordering a baseline drug test as

a condition of granting informal supervision.

1 The facts of the underlying offenses are not relevant to the analysis of possible

error based on this record. Therefore

, we will omit the traditional statement of facts.3

We have reviewed the entire record as mandated by Wende, supra , 25 Cal.3d 436,

and Anders, supra , 386 U.S. 738, and have not discovered any reasonably arguable issue

for reversal on appeal. Compe tent counsel has represented the Minor on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order granting informal supervision, based on the stated conditions, is

affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

HALLER, J.

AARON, J.