alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6285 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a trading prohibition 

for certain issuers that retain public accounting firms that have not 

been subject to inspection by the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself, Mrs. SPARTZ, and Mr. BARR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a 

trading prohibition for certain issuers that retain public 

accounting firms that have not been subject to inspection 

by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accelerating Holding 

5 Foreign Companies Accountable Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6285 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRADING PROHIBITION FOR 2 CONSECUTIVE NON2 INSPECTION YEARS. 

3 Section 104(i) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

4 U.S.C. 7214(i)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘the 

6 foreign jurisdiction described in clause (i)’’ and in7 serting ‘‘a foreign jurisdiction’’; and 

8 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

9 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

10 ‘‘3’’ and inserting ‘‘2’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (A), in the matter 

12 preceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘3’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘2’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.4
                       CERTIFICATION

I, Steven D. Davis, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern
California Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

August 5, 2004

/S/ STEVEN D. DAVIS
Steven D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000075448
<NAME> NSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996<F1>
<CASH>                                           4,619
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                       209
<INVENTORY>                                      4,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,000
<PP&E>                                           1,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                      90
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           934
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,108
<SALES>                                          4,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,826
<CGS>                                            3,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (78)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (78)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (78)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant reported on Form 8-k, filed November 15, 1996, a change in
its fiscal year end from October 31 to December 31, effective with
calendar year beginning January 1, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
exhibit_4-5.htm










Exhibit 4.5



 



SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the non-employee directors of CYREN Ltd. (the “Company”) for services as directors:








	
  

	
·

	
Directors are granted stock options, with new directors receiving an initial grant of 50,000 options and continuing directors receiving an “evergreen” option grant of 16,667 options.  At the annual meeting in October 2009, shareholders approved a one-time increase of the evergreen option grant to 30,000 options.







 



	
  

	
·

	
Through 2008, directors did not receive cash compensation for their services.  However, at the annual meeting in December 2008, shareholders approved the payment of cash compensation, in addition to the stated options compensation, according to the following:







 



	
  

	
1.

	
NIS 31,700 base annually per director, as linked to the applicable Israeli consumer price index, payable in four equal installments at the beginning of each calendar quarter; and







 



	
  

	
2.

	
NIS 1,590 per director per face to face Board or committee meeting or NIS954 (60% of NIS 1590) in case of telephonic participation at such meeting, payable at the beginning of each calendar quarter following the quarter during which a Board member participated in a meeting. No separate per meeting compensation will be paid for committee meetings that are held on the same day immediately prior or subsequent to a Board meeting.  In that event, a Board and committee meeting will be considered one meeting.







 



	
  ●

	
For non-Israeli based directors, the amounts set forth will be paid in United States dollars, according to the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on the date of payment.








 




On June 6, 2013, the Compensation Committee unanimously approved a change in the cash compensation paid to non-employee directors to a flat $7,500 per quarter for each such director.



 


Other than the foregoing option grants, cash compensation and reimbursement of expenses, the Company does not compensate its non-employee directors for serving on its board of directors.
#### Ike LA HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4460.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1934.

Hardin & Coleman, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Pegues & Pegues, of Mansfield, for appel-lee.

DREW, Judge.

This is a companion case of case No. 4458 on the docket of this court, 156 So. 366, decided this day.

For the reasons assigned in case No. 4458, the judgment of the lower court in this case is reversed, and the demands of plaintiff are rejected, at his cost in both courts.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Damian Cosmo CAIATI-MEDICI, Defendant — Appellant.

No. 01-10385.

D.C. No. CR-00-00184-KJD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 4, 2002.*

Decided Nov. 6, 2002.

Before HAWKINS, GRABER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant Damian Caiati-Medici expressly waived his appellate rights. Although Appellant argues that he does not understand English, an interpreter was supplied throughout the plea proceedings and, in addition, Appellant (a naturalized citizen with more than a decade of residency) spoke to the court in English. Because the waiver was knowing and voluntary, we dismiss this appeal. *United States v. Nguyen, 235*F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (explaining that a waiver of the right to an appeal is enforced if the waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49473-49474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-14935-J; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional 
Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Isingnakmeut Incorporated. 
The lands are in the vicinity of Shungnak, Alaska, and are located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 16 N., R. 7 E.,
    Secs. 13 and 24.

    Containing 1,280 acres.
T. 16 N., R. 8 E.,
    Sec. 18.

    Containing 592.20 acres.
T. 16 N., R. 9 E.,
    Secs. 5, 6, 8, and 9;
    Secs. 16, 21, 28, and 29.

    Containing 5,027.98 acres.

    Aggregating 6,900.18 acres.
    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to NANA 
Regional Corporation, Inc. when the surface estate is conveyed to 
Isingnakmeut Incorporated. Notice of the decision will also be 
published four times in the Tundra Drums.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until September 22, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements 
of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their 
rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from:

[[Page 49474]]

Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh 
Avenue, <greek-i>13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f0fabff3fdfcbff2feffe7f4e8f0fff2f4d1f0fabff3fdfcbff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24454f0a4648490a474b4a52415d454a474164454f0a4648490a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Crystal Arroyo,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E8-19382 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 3.3**

 

**P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

AMENDMENTTO THEAMENDED BY-LAWSOFP&F INDUSTRIES, INC.

 

ARTICLE IIIDIRECTORS

 

SECTION 1. POWERS, NUMBER, QUALIFICATION AND TERM. The property,affairs and business of the corporation shall be managed by its board of directors,consisting of ten persons. The directors shall be elected for three year termsto succeed those whose terms then expire. If a vacancy shall occur in anyclass, the director elected to fill that vacancy shall be elected for theremaining term of that class. The directors shall have the power at any timewhen a stockholders’ meeting is not in session to increase or decrease theirown number by an amendment to these By-Laws. If the number of directors beincreased, the additional directors shall be elected for such terms as shallmaintain equality in the annual classes, as nearly as may be practicable.Vacancies created by an amendment increasing the number of directors may befilled like other vacancies by a majority of the directors in office at thattime. If the number of directors be reduced, the terms of the directorsremaining in office need not be changed, but the terms of the directors electedto succeed them shall be changed to the extent necessary to maintain equalityin the annual classes, as nearly as may be practicable. The number of directorsshall never be less than three. Directors need not be stockholders.

 

----
Statement of
Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee. I, Joseph Panepinto, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the Trustee), state: (a) A review of the Trustees
activities for the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (the Reporting
Period) and of the Trustees performance under the Standard Terms for Trust
Agreements dated November 5, 2004 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the
Depositor) and the Trustee, as trustee and securities intermediary (the Securities
Intermediary), in each case amended by a series supplement between the Depositor,
the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary (as amended in each such case, the Trust
Agreement), has been made under my supervision. (b)  To the best of my knowledge and
based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust
Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for PPLUS Trust Series
LTD-1 Trust Certificates. The Bank of New York Mellon  
        (formerly The Bank of New York), as  TrusteeDate:
March 4, 2011
      /s/ Joseph Panepinto
        Joseph Panepinto
                                                 Vice President
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 50681 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Tommy Delando Burns,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06

- CR

- 89

- 1

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Tommy Delando Burns, federal prisoner # 35499

- 177, was convicted
of one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine
and two counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of crack cocaine. Following a remand, he was re sentenced to concurrent terms of 324 month s

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 23, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50681 Document: 00515950851 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2021No. 20

- 50681

2 in prison and five years of supervised release, but his sentence s were subsequently reduced, and he is now serving co n current terms of 2 62 month s in prison. He moved in the district court for resentencing under the First Step Act of 2018, § 404, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018) , and he asked for a reduction of both his sentences and his terms of supervised
release

. Without a hearing, the district court denied the motion in an order without giving any reasons.
Though district courts need not always explain why they have denied a motion, meaningful review is possible here only with a statement of reasons
for the denial. See Peteet v. Dow Chem. Co. , 868 F.2d 1428, 1436 (5th Cir. 1989). Absent such a statement, we can only guess why the motion was
denied. We thus REMAND for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to explain why it d enied the motion , and we retain jurisdiction , as is customary for limited remands. See, e.g. , United States v. Gomez , 905 F.3d 347, 354

- 56 (5th Cir. 2018). Case: 20-50681 Document: 00515950851 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2021
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
            Financial Data Schedule September 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                 0000075053
<NAME>                eWeb21 Corp.


     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements  for the period from  inception,  six month  periods ended
September  30,  2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,731,223
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,481,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,935,402
<PP&E>                                         1,298,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (302,228)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,921,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,313,119
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,074,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,921,532
<SALES>                                        4,365,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,365,337
<CGS>                                          3,390,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,454,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (113,387)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (4,479,534)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (4,479,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (4,479,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (4,593,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.10)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.12


                                        H. IRWIN LEVY



June 29, 2001




nStor Technologies, Inc.
10140 Mesa Rim Road
San Diego, CA  92121

Gentlemen:

The  maturity  dates of the  following  notes due to H.  Irwin  Levy from  nStor
Technologies, Inc. are hereby extended to August 31, 2001:

        Subordinated Promissory Note for $100,000, dated May 16, 2001

        Subordinated Promissory Note for $250,000, dated May 21, 2001

        Subordinated Promissory Note for $375,000, dated May 30, 2001

        Subordinated Promissory Note for $75,000, dated June 5, 2001


All other terms of the notes remain the same.


                                    /s/ H. Irwin Levy

                                   ----------------------------
                                   H. Irwin Levy

HIL:bf
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis L. Winger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Dennis L. Winger   
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|Date: February 8, 2008
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135405) pertaining to the 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141352) pertaining to the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Touch Clarity Limited Enterprise
Management Incentives Share Option Plan 2002, and the Touch Clarity Limited 2006 U.S. Stock
Plan,(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149022) pertaining to the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, the
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the Avivo Corporation 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the Visual
Sciences, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the Visual Sciences, Inc.
2004 Equity Incentive Award Plan, and the Visual Sciences, Inc. 2006 Employment
Commencement Equity Incentive Award Plan, and(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-157054) pertaining to the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan