alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 22 & 23 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      901
<ALLOWANCES>                                        84
<INVENTORY>                                        121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,430
<PP&E>                                           2,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        10,500
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,019
<SALES>                                          5,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,721
<CGS>                                            4,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,718)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
#### In re: John S. SCHULTZ, Debtor, Allied Domecq Retailing USA; Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc.; Dunkin’ Donuts Realty, Inc., Appellees, v. John S. Schultz, Appellant.

No. 01-3572.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 5, 2002.

Before NORRIS and CLAY, Circuit Judges, and O’MEARA, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable John Corbett O’Meara, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

John Schultz, the debtor in this Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s order denying his petition for discharge of his debts.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the *280applicable law, we are not persuaded that the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel erred in affirming the order of the Bankruptcy Court.

Because the reasoning which supports the order has been articulated by the Bankruptcy Court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the Bankruptcy Court in its Memorandum of Opinion dated April 21, 2000.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Larry K. Davis, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Integrated Micrometallurgical Systems, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  September 28, 2006

/s/ Larry K. Davis



Larry K. Davis

Chief Financial Officer, Vice President (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6369 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and maintain 

facilities in the Sun River Project, Montana, for the purpose of hydroelectric power generation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. ROSENDALE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct, operate, and maintain facilities in the Sun River Project, 

Montana, for the purpose of hydroelectric power generation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sun River Hydropower 

5 Authorization Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6369 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF SUN RIVER PROJECT, MON2 TANA. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

4 acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation and pur5 suant to the reclamation laws, may construct, operate, and 

6 maintain facilities in the Sun River Project, Montana, for 

7 the purpose of hydroelectric power generation. 

8 (b) EFFECT.—The authorization under subsection 

9 (a) shall— 

10 (1) be in addition to any other authorizations 

11 for the Sun River Project under existing law; and 

12 (2) not limit, restrict, or alter operations of the 

13 Sun River Project in a manner that would be ad14 verse to the satisfaction of valid existing water 

15 rights or water deliveries to the holder of any valid 

16 water service contract. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6389 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption 

from gross income for mandatory restitution or civil damages as recompense for trafficking in persons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2022 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself, Mr. ARRINGTON, Ms. SEWELL, and Mr. SMITH

of Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exemption from gross income for mandatory restitution or civil damages as recompense for trafficking in 

persons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Human Trafficking 

5 Survivor Tax Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6389 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION 

2 RESTITUTION AND CIVIL DAMAGES AWARD3 ED UNDER SECTIONS 1593 AND 1595 OF TITLE 

4 18, UNITED STATES CODE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by inserting before section 140 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 139J. CERTAIN AMOUNT RECEIVED AS RESTITUTION 

9 OR CIVIL DAMAGES AS RECOMPENSE FOR 

10 TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS. 

11 ‘‘Gross income shall not include any civil damages, 

12 restitution, or other monetary award (including compen13 satory or statutory damages and restitution imposed in 

14 a criminal matter) awarded— 

15 ‘‘(1) pursuant to an order of restitution under 

16 section 1593 of title 18, United States Code, or 

17 ‘‘(2) in an action under section 1595 of title 18, 

18 United States Code.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec20 tions for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the In21 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting be22 fore the item relating to section 140 the following new 

23 item: 

‘‘Sec. 139J. Certain amount received as restitution or civil damages as recompense for trafficking in persons.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6389 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
March 1, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HOUSE PRO, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-11-00999-CV V.

EPMA CORPORATION D/B/A JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF HOUSTON, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on July 20, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

HOUSE PRO, INC.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.4

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



August 7, 2003
                                               /S/ DEBRA L. REED
                                             ______________________
                                               Debra L. Reed
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The undersigned officer of China Ruitai International Holdings Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Dian Min MaDian Min Ma, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit (32)

SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the Report), I, Michael H. Thaman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael H. ThamanChief Financial Officer

August 8, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7056

RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT KELLY, Sergeant, HRRJ; OFFICER GOVIA, Officer, HRRJ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00889-CO-TCB)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, 

Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Sergeant Kelly 

and Officer Govia summary judgment on Lassiter’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-031
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 11680
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CLARENCE BRENSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:18

- cr

- 00203

- JB

- B

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 11680

Before W ILSON , N EWSOM , and G RANT , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Clarence Brenson in his appeal from the revocation of his supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant t o Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

. Ourindependent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motio n to withdraw is GRANTED , and Brenson’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      542
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,007
<PP&E>                                           3,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,272
<BONDS>                                          2,193
<COMMON>                                           678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              194
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,265
<SALES>                                          3,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,747
<CGS>                                            2,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    81
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    370
<INCOME-TAX>                                       159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (39)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.04<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.87<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Represents basic earnings per share as defined in FASB Statement No. 128
<F2> Represents diluted earnings per share as defined in FASB Statement No. 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Katherine I. Myers, Respondent, v. Ellen T. Herzog, Formerly Ellen T. Adams, Appellant, Impleaded with James H. Wheeler.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on *Brooks Brothers*v. *Tiffany*(117 App. Div. 470) and *Backes*v. *Mechanics & Traders’ Bank*(130 id. 20).
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 657

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of three hydroelectric projects in the State of Arkansas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of three hydroelectric projects

in the State of Arkansas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

4 Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of

5 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal En6 ergy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the li7 censee for FERC Project No. 4204, 4660, and 4659 (and

8 after reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with

9 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest require10 ments of such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures
2

•HR 657 IH

1 under such section, to extend the time required for com2 mencement of construction for the project for up to a max3 imum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall

4 take effect for the project upon the expiration of the exten5 sion (issued by the Commission under such section 13)

6 of the period required for commencement of construction

7 of such project.

Æ