alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICKY DAVID D. SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 298 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert O. Bond, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   ROBERT O. BOND


Robert O. Bond


President and Chief Operating Officer





May 7, 2010











This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          50,858
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,285
<INVENTORY>                                    157,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               628,700
<PP&E>                                       6,048,887
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,705,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,220,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          864,718
<BONDS>                                      1,987,096
<COMMON>                                        43,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     811,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,220,570
<SALES>                                      1,797,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,881,965
<CGS>                                        1,129,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,154,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               697,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (143,299)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (277,333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (277,333)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.00)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherman Steward, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 64-66.

Fifth District.

June 30, 1966.

*252Richard E. Boyle, of East St. Louis, for appellant; John M. Earns, Jr., State’s Attorney of St. Clair County, of Belleville (John F. O’Connell, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH.

Not to be published in full.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

INGRAM MICRO AND ESIS

NORTHEAST WC CLAIMS,

 Petitioners

 v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL

BOARD (SANDRA HEIM),

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 431 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 

 
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTI, David M. Gandossi, Chief Financial Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to Section 906 of the*Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002*, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe *Securities Exchange Act of 1934*(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated:November 25, 2005           /s/ David M. Gandossi         David M. Gandossi    Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MercerInternational Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Motion GRANTED and Order filed March 28, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00248-CV

____________

IN RE PRODIGY SERVICES, LLC, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-35849

ORDER

On March 28, 2014, relator Prodigy Services, LLC, filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Wesley 

Ward, Judge of the 234th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to dismiss the 

Office of the Attorney General from the underlying suit, set aside his order 

denying relator’s motion to release liens, conclude discovery in the underlying 
2

case, and set aside his order denying relator’s motion to disburse settlement funds

entered in trial court number 2012-35849, styled Prodigy Services, LLC v. ENI US 

Operating Company, Inc. Relator claims respondent abused his discretion by 

allowing the Office of the Attorney General to intervene in the underlying lawsuit, 

by reopening discovery, and refusing to disburse settlement funds to relator.

Relator has also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On March 28, 2014, relator asked this court to 

stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s 

request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced 

unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s 

amended motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER the March 31, 2014 hearing on the motion to disburse funds 

and the motion to enforce the settlement in trial court cause number 2012-35849, 

Prodigy Services, LLC v. ENI US Operating Company, Inc., STAYED until a final 

decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further 

order of this court.

PER CURIAM
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6322 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct outreach to veterans 

regarding identity theft resources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Ms. STEFANIK (for herself, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. GAETZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct outreach to veterans regarding identity theft resources, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Safe Holidays 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OUTREACH TO VETERANS REGARDING IDENTITY 

7 THEFT RESOURCES. 

8 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Subchapter III of chapter 57 of 

9 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6322 IH

1 end the following new section (and conforming the table 

2 of sections at the beginning of such chapter accordingly): 

3 ‘‘§ 5729. Outreach to veterans regarding identity theft 

4 resources 

5 ‘‘Every year during the 10-week period beginning No6 vember 1, the Secretary shall conduct outreach to veterans 

7 to— 

8 ‘‘(1) promote the Veteran Identity Theft 

9 Helpline of the Department (or successor resource); 

10 and 

11 ‘‘(2) identify other identity theft resources 

12 available to veterans and beneficiaries of programs 

13 administered by the Secretary, including with re14 spect to actions made by the Secretary to protect the 

15 identities of veterans and beneficiaries.’’. 

16 (b) PLAN.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

17 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Af18 fairs shall submit to Congress a plan detailing the efforts 

19 of the Secretary to promote identity theft awareness and 

20 to assist veterans and beneficiaries of programs adminis21 tered by the Secretary who experience identity theft. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.33

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

I, Liu Jian, citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), PRC ID card number 310102197211124453, hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing Wole Technology Co., Ltd. (“Wole”) or the individual or entity that is designated by Wole (each, a “Representative”) to the extent permitted by applicable laws of the PRC, as my sole attorney to single exercise the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Amended and Restated Business Operations Agreement entered into among Wole and Guangzhou Qianjun Technology Co., Ltd. (“Qianjun”), Huang Hui and me on December 4, 2013 (the “Operations Agreement”) :

 

I hereby authorize and designate the Representative to vote on my behalf at the shareholders’ meetings of Qianjun and exercise the full voting rights as its shareholder as granted to me by law and under the Articles of Association of Qianjun, including but not limited to, the right to propose the holding of shareholders’ meeting, to accept any notification about the holding and discussion procedure of the meeting, to attend the shareholders’ meeting of Qianjun and exercise the full voting rights (such as, to serve as my authorized representative on the shareholders’ meeting of Qianjun, to designate and appoint the executive director or directors of the Board and the general manager and to decide the allotment of the profits, etc.), to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest in Qianjun, etc.

 

The above authorization and designation are based upon the fact that the Representative is acting as an employee of Wole and Wole has appointed and authorized the Representative as its authorized representative in accordance with the Operations Agreement. Once the Representative loses her title or position in Wole or Wole issues a written notice to dismiss or replace the Representative with another person as its authorized representative, this Power of Attorney shall become invalid immediately and I will withdraw such authorization to him immediately and designate/authorize another individual(s) designated by Wole to exercise all the rights mentioned above. I will sign another Power of Attorney in form and substance satisfactory to Wole.

 

The term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10) years from its date of execution, unless the Operations Agreement is terminated early for any reason or the relevant events as outlined above occur.

 

This Power of Attorney shall, upon becoming effective, replace all the previous POAs I had signed previously.

 

 

	
 
    	
Liu   Jian
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Liu Jian
    
	
 
    	
Date:   December 4, 2013
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1945

JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; UNITEDSTATES POSTAL SERVICE; AUGUSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; THE UNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS; UNITED STATES MILITARY; VETERANS ADMINISTRATION; COUNTY OF AUGUSTA; CITY OF STAUNTON, VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (MISC-00-29-7) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order finding that he had not complied with a prefiling injunction and denyinghis motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. FBI , No. MISC-00-29-7 (W.D. Va. June 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.3
                       CERTIFICATION

I, Edwin A. Guiles, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern
California Gas Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

August 5, 2004

/S/ EDWIN A. GUILES
Edwin A. Guiles
Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony DeFilippo, Appellant.

[677 NYS2d 487]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered August 27, 1997, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). By failing to move under CPL 220.60 (3) to withdraw his plea before sentencing, or to vacate the judgment of conviction under CPL 440.10, the defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665; *People v Doolittle,*231 AD2d 586; *People v Hicks,*201 AD2d 831, 832; *People v Selnik,*194 AD2d 472; *People v Kubik,*186 AD2d 271). Moreover, it is apparent from the record that the defendant was aware of and understood the possible defense of mental disease or defect *(see, People v Kittle,*154 AD2d 782; *People v Sharpe,*72 AD2d 572) and had discussed his legal defenses with defense counsel *(see, People v Ladd,*232 AD2d 687).

The defendant effectively waived appellate review of his remaining contention as part of his plea agreement. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed *(see, People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the amended annual report of Pet Express Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Renea Yamada, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Diane Egger, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Renea Yamada

Renea Yamada

Chief Executive Officer

July
9, 2007



/s/ Diane Egger

Diane Egger

Chief Financial Officer

July
9, 2007
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WRINKL, INC., 

Appellant

v.

META PLATFORMS, INC., 

Appellee

______________________

2023-1369, 2023-1370

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

00882, IPR2021-00883.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceedings are DISMISSED under Fed. R. 

App. P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-1369 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 04/19/2023
2 WRINKL, INC. V. META PLATFORMS, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

April 19, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 19, 2023

Case: 23-1369 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 04/19/2023
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No. 315] 

      ( print page 49230)    
By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, the authority to convene an interagency meeting on climate change consistent with Section 684(b) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, FY 2008 (Pub. L. 110-161). 

Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure subject to, or affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation or procedure as amended from time to time. 

Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may at any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this delegation of authority. 

                    This delegation of authority shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: August 7, 2008. 

John Negroponte, 

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. E8-19294 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P