alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael D. WILKINS, Debtor-Appellant, v. BENCHMARK COMMUNITY BANK, Creditor-Appellee, Keith PHILLIPS, Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.

No. 02-1544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 25, 2002.

Decided Nov. 20, 2002.

*656Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Joseph Burns, Law Office of James J. Burns, P.L.C., Richmond, Virginia; David Richard Ruby, McSweeney *&*Crump, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Wilkins appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale of certain real estate in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. *See Wilkins v. Benchmark Community Bank,*Nos. CA-02-154-3; BK-99-34315 (E.D. Va. filed & entered Apr. 24, 2002; filed May 13, 2002 & entered May 14, 2002). We deny Wilkins’ motion for reconsideration of this court’s prior order denying his motions to expedite and for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET AND CASH FLOWS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,756
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         55
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             867
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           219
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,550
<COMMON>                                         1,259
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                208
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               940
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,047
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,550
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        2,050
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               132
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,717
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,849
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            201
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  26
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     227
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            74
<NET-INCOME>                                       153
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      150
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           41
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             619
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0







</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Arotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Paup, Vice President - Finance and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ Thomas
              J.
              PaupThomas
                J. Paup,
              Vice
                President - Finance and CFO
              (Chief
                Financial Officer)




Date:
      April 16, 2007
#### INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO. v. HENDERSON.

No. 5469.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 30, 1937.

H. W. Ayres, of Jonesboro, for appellant.

O. A. Easterling, of Monroe, for appel-lee.

TALIAFERRO' Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover a balance due on open account for the price of shoes sold and delivered to defendant during the year 1934. Supplementing the cause of action alleged upon, there is attached to the petition defendant’s three checks in plaintiff’s favor, equal to the amount sued for, which, it is alleged, were given to pay the balance due on the account and which it appears were dishonored when presented to the payer bank because of insufficient funds to defendant’s credit. Defendant admits execution and delivery of the checks, but avers that this was done by him while laboring under a misapprehension of the true state of facts, and therefore issued without consideration. In other respects, his answer is a general denial.

Upon trial of the case, under the issues tendered by the pleadings, there was judgment for plaintiff as by it prayed for, less $140 paid on the account subsequent to filing of suit. Defendant prosecutes a suspen-sive appeal. Answering the appeal, plaintiff charges that it was taken for the purpose of delay and is frivolous. We are ask-*204eel to inflict the statutory 10 per cent, penalty permitted in such cases, in -addition to affirming the judgment.

Defendant has made no appearance in the case. His counsel has filed no brief. The record amply sustains the judgment rendered by the lower court. The appeal obviously was taken for delay and is therefore frivolous. The facts of the case warrant imposition of the penalty. Article 907, Code of Practice; State v. O. H. Schonhausen et al., 37 La.Ann. 42; Devoe & Reynolds Co. v. Turpin et al., 16 La.App. 43, 133 So. 493; Mingo Hicks et al. v. Ella Bell et al., 1 La.App. 563; Mauberet v. Mauberet, 12 La.App. 553, 125 So. 886.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with 10 per cent, thereof additional as damages for frivolous appeal.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



November 6, 2003
                                           /S/ STEPHEN L. BAUM
                                         ______________________
                                           Stephen L. Baum
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.6



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







May 5, 2009



/S/  Robert SchlaxRobert SchlaxChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date: February 26, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joshua G. JamesName:
    
    Joshua G. JamesTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date: February 26, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael S. HerringName:
    
    Michael S. HerringTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
 A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Omniture, Inc. and will be retained by Omniture,
Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 The forgoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and they shall not
be considered filed as part of such report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,213
<SECURITIES>                                    14,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,427
<INVENTORY>                                     26,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,905
<PP&E>                                         110,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,196
<BONDS>                                         32,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,966
<SALES>                                         50,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,285
<CGS>                                           34,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (47)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                       820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,592
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
#### Martha Lamburn, Respondent, v. Richmond Light and Railroad Company, Appellant. Frederick Beucher, Respondent.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed by default, with costs. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended June 30, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18969]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee Meeting (Teleconference)

AGENCY: National Council on Disability (NCD).
    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, NCD 
gives notice that its Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee (CDAC) will 
hold a meeting by conference call on the date and time noted below.
    Date and Time: Thursday, August 21, 2008, 2:30 p.m. EDT.
    Place: NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004.
    Status: All parts of this conference call will be open to the 
public. People interested in participating on this call should contact 
the appropriate staff member listed below. Due to limited resources, 
only a few telephone lines will be available.
    Agenda: Roll call, announcements, reports, new business, 
adjournment. A detailed agenda will be posted 10 days before the 
meeting at http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/advisory/cultural/cultural.htm.
    Contact Person for More Information: To obtain information on the 
meeting, including the call-in number, please contact Mark S. Quigley, 
NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004, 202-272-2008 
(direct voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax), 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f627e7a6668636a764f616c6b21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e031f1b0709020b172e000d0a40090118">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail).
    Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee Mission: The purpose of NCD's 
CDAC is to provide advice and recommendations to NCD on issues 
affecting people with disabilities from culturally diverse backgrounds.
    Accommodations: People needing reasonable accommodations should 
notify NCD immediately.

    Dated: August 8, 2008.
Michael C. Collins,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E8-18969 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Paul TWEED, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.

Decided Nov. 14, 2002.

*638Robert Paul Tweed, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Paul Tweed seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and construed by the district court as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court properly construed Tweed’s action, styled as an “Independent Action,” as a successive § 2255 motion. For the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that Tweed has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Tweed,*Nos. CR-94-11-V; CA-02-86-5-1-V (W.D.N.C. July 81, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2258(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF OMNITURE, INC.
 COMPANY NAME
    
    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATIONOmniture A/S
    
    DenmarkOmniture HK Limited
    
    Hong KongOmniture KK
    
    JapanOldCo1 UK Limited
    
    United KingdomInstadia Limited
    
    United KingdomOmniture GmbH
    
    GermanyOmniture Limited
    
    United KingdomTouch Clarity, Inc.
    
    DelawareOffermatica Corporation
    
    DelawareOTTO Digital, LLC
    
    DelawareICS Offermatica SRL
    
    MoldovaFour Point Partners GmBH
    
    GermanyVisual Sciences, Inc.
    
    DelawareVisual Sciences Technologies, LLC
    
    DelawareVisual Sciences Holding B.V.
    
    NetherlandsVisual Sciences UK Limited
    
    United KingdomVisual Sciences Callcenter and Services B.V.
    
    NetherlandsVisual Sciences SAS
    
    France
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6041 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

10 Bow Circle in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Charles 

E. Fraser Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Ms. MACE (for herself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

TIMMONS, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. CLYBURN, and Mr. RICE of South Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10 Bow Circle in Hilton Head Island, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Charles E. Fraser Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHARLES E. FRASER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 10 Bow Circle in Hilton Head 

6 Island, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Charles E. Fraser Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6041 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles E. Fraser 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 679

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to make Barnegat Bay,

New Jersey, eligible for priority consideration under the national estuary

program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1995

Mr. SAXTON (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. ZIMMER, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr.

FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. MARTINI, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to make

Barnegat Bay, New Jersey, eligible for priority consideration under the national estuary program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 320(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution

4 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1330(a)(2)(B)) is amended by in5 serting ‘‘Barnegat Bay, New Jersey;’’ after ‘‘Puget Sound,

6 Washington;’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ended  November  30,  2008,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory
Adams,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 26, 2009


By:       /s/ Gregory Adams

         Gregory Adams
         Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal
         accounting officer